Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT. 75-90 4Mr. Patrick McAchren� _,2- � August ll., 1.975 7 A significant contributor to the declineSn1owdeniwillifurxn`7k'}hards s residential updatedmapof Butte Gow6ty deer r �,-of you with of deer winter ranges. P P ranges.., We recommend c�i1;e�Ul xoni;ng of specific areas selected for intensive residential and commercial development mi/ g (orgreater) should ,then be establiahe believe that r nacre nimtajmcir�on��ittt�oylots) in the .deer winter range. 114c--believe for all other undeveloped lands in deer winter,'range, and. only one residence` should be permitted on each lot. FF t, 0 The construction of residences or recreatioltCal cabins .on rural homes:itea is . not the entire cause of our great concern abau'F future over -development of deer ranges. The reason for our concern is a composite of adverne effects including physi.cai load of habitat (foody cover, fawning `areaa),`direct human disturbance, conflicts of use (deer in home gardens),, illegal deer kill,, and deer :kills or harassment by dogs Thank you the, �r3opportunity to provide these Comments and recommendations \fin the rezone Sincerely, t, 71 Robert W. Lasse Regional Manag r Reg ior .. 2 i nit rr r r SYATE OF CALIFORNIA—RESOURCES AGENCY ; j EDMUND G, BROWN JR., GOVERNOR CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER `u-IUALITY CONTROL BOARD— CENTRAL, VALLEY REGION 3201 S STREET :JACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95816 "+ PHONEs (916) 445.0270 t ' 452.3977 ;22 October' 1975 Mr, Patrick A; McAchren r`•#ite County Planning Department 7''County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 r1 Subjects: 1, Butte Creek Canyon Area Rezone (764) 2. Forest Ranch Area,,Rezone (75-90) I 3.1, Stilson Canyon Area Re one i Dear Mr, McAchren; I� We have rFviewed the subject draft Environmental Impact 'Re- po',`ts and concur with the findings that the proposals Will re- du6e the potential problems related to erosion and :sewage dieucsal. � ,'; Please contact Mr. Crawford, of this office, if- you have any questions. sincerely, WILLIAM D, BALDWIN Senior Engineer 'j Sacramento Watershed eec/acs cc: But,.te County Health. Dept �~ i s, California State University, Cirico 01co, Cilifornia 95929 Department of t`Siological Sciences (916) 895-5356 October 22, 1075 Mr:- Patrice A. McAchren Environmental Coorditiator County of Butte Planning. De-artme►*t 7 County Cerite_r Wlive`' Orov .11e, Califor i;ia. 95965 Dear pat: Thank you for sending me the draft EIRs on the Forest Ranch, Butte Creek Canyon, and Stilson Canyon rezones, l appreciate the oppor- tunity to provide, input. My opinion of these EIRs is ftetty much the same as my opinion on moUt ETRst they fulfill the legal: requirements for an E R, 'brit as for being adequate statements of the possible effecto.,:of devotbpment on relatively undeveloped land, they are not. These are primrrily description* of tke area in question. The destrirtions of the envL-on>wental settings and habitat are so broad that they could apply to many different Areas. Apparently there has been little or ne research done to determine the dynamics of the ecological system. I fully realize that a lot of tine and finances are required to do A thorough EIR which way end up showing that minimal impact will occur. ;but I also feel, strongly that the only way to prevent serious habitat duruption and poor mAnagemOnt of our resourets is to Caste- fully, evaluate ",')e resources through long term acientific inveati- f ttio.n and mince decisions based on that' investigation. ) Thanks a$1°lin fer rend the EIRs Rose Lederer Asoodliaate Professor of Bi'lological Sciences I li 1 ihb California State University and College's t, , STATE O,F' :k+fpGk,+(�—RESOURCES AGENT YkDMWfBj� G U;joWN JR., Governor �{ DEPART`;� ,T 4F',FISH AND GAMS l r , r Reg106 ,Z �� r Draxe Sa�cr�ir California 95818 C ab) -x+45 6370 f ) I r October28, 1975 •r r , Mr. Patrick McAchren Environmental Coordinator t Butte County Planning Department a 7 County Center Drive Orovle, California 95965 Dear Mr. Mckchren {' The California Department of Fish and Gaxie has re l i p ;�n.ewed the Draftl,; Environmental Impact Deports for "Rezoning of thOVorest Ronch (-)Rezoning of Butte Creek Canyon Area'",, and Rezoning of the Stilsr�h Canyon Area", We are pleased with the recommendations for proteb1' ��11 1 of open space in Butte County and with the cooperation you have €�r`." � our Wildlife Una t.,Xanager, Mr; James Snowden. 4 We strongly recommend 06-ption of the rezoning recommended in the car aft, EiRs because "there wouYA be significant beneficial effects on wi'.,d'L fe through preservation oflt'important habitats. Mr. anoWden will cort{ -` e to work with you and with the planning Commission and be availahie.zo 'j answer questions or provide any additional information yoll may reolzost. Thank ,you for the opportunity to review and comment on these imporbty- t Sincerely, \Dobert W. Lassen: Regional Ntvmger �egion 2 ,L z r r� { , t l i 441 197 A S. l 5t7te Of California 11 Office of PlaPnincg' and Research Attn,. �l.Xl am G. Kirkham 1 /,,'L-ate Cleatincfhouse ( c 1400 'I'mith Sacramerto, Calx f. 95814' PX -NSCV 751:62768 uzoniNG or, .r6-Rnq'z' rtrux rry z+rar.,A 5CI1 0 75102769 RM00.11114 , OV STXL5ON CANYON, ARE, � Tse at Mro xtUrk barn n We are ir,; ,receipt oyou,r letters datL,-,4 botohor ?N f 1975 requestinq � j1 ..:. variou, of-11,-iifin Oil 'i:,ho ' `C'jti'•est Ranch, nLZtte Creek C;'iinyon ► and-StaL,` son banymi Rezones, V ha8l" ready t�procee lots a n avised that tnn newspaper publicat mi of legal descriptions x has on set, 'Ph,o daton for pubilc hearings are ms follows: Poreat Rand 47ov . rt , 10115 *0 Butte Creek Canyon-No'v. 1975 (t--nta-- five) and stil i r~anyon-rNov. 20, l75. if any departmonts wish to ?lave input thoy rl` s ,10 so` by tho -Lbove °1"tf:G$j1' Y�4 you havo any fr.Pe to ConMo ,I '5yy1 .: �nvarpn�iental Cararc�3,zt�tt � J Jai f mcg � v 1 yt ;l yy GOVERN UR'S "OFFICE Ia 0 0ICF G?F'PL`�NN1NPsAND RESEARCH (j' • i,W0) TENTH STREET ' ~ sA CRAM)e.NTO 95814 1 .i EDMUND G.OrAOVIZRN RoWN JR,, e6tober 22., 197" Butte Cru� Mr. Lawrence J. Lawson County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive z1 1 Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Mr'. Lawson: SUBJECT: SCH_# 75102768 REZONING OF FOREST RANCH AREA The State Cl, rin house ues a .ret'4 g � +:s a' 2',",T-day extension of the review period on your envi l of .meftta" document. The review 1� period for your document would be extended 4.-o November 27, 1976. fir; �! in the absence of a riotlfY'16ation from you by one week froYll the date of this :Letter, the Clearinghouse oTa ll extend the review period. For. further information you may call, m: '' r a member of my staff at (916) 445-0613. Sincerely, IL �1 William G :, Kirkham Management Systems Officer State Clearinghouse j t+r I6 i � ■may my n Ar NIA AST I1 E(DI aOG District 2 Clearinghouse cDepartment of 2\nthropold1gy cala_fornia state vn;Lversity Chico, CA 95929.� Novemuer 3, 1975 1 Patri�k' A. McAchren Enva.r ,�merital Coordinator bitceCounty Planning Department 7 County Center Dry t Oroville, CA 95955 Q �� Dear Mr. McAchren: �r ` r have reviewed the draft of your Forest Ranr,'�i Ar eg Rezone . EIR.. The proposed project will definitely -�fect the historic and pre -historic culttiral .1-:3sourc_ys of th Forest Ranch area. it should be madc­.- clear, and,'%";your draft ExR I i . does ,snot da so, that any propose}d land �,xse wall have direct i adverse impact upon the`,^ul.tural,, reso,ur8e8-of the area. ursensitivity. t Forest �ta'i��iz area �.c have Appendix D a£ your Dl;R shows the""Forest , ti high archaeologicaly. Yet nowhc;re in your draft S � J 5.s tfiis point brought out. since ''ey yours, Kea. h L o on Coodiha'Ik.o District ,2 Clearinghouse ' �= A t44 (016) W7,61+12 �I w GOVERNOR'S OFFICE 1rj` �\ C bu;d11 OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH :. 1400 TENTH STREET NO IV 6 r+ �. SACRAMENTO 95814 J �qr� (916) X45-061., OiiOVILL-, r--,r-I EDMUND G. DROWN JR, 3 November 25, 19",.'5 Mr. Lawrence J. Lawson Butte County Planning Dept. 7 County Center .Dri Te oroville, CA 95965 l SUBJECT: SCH #751,0276;9 - Rezoning Stilson Camy, V #75102761,yP - Rezoning Forest Ranch Area g yon Area L7Po� Mr. Lawsor,510�76;7 Rezoning o£ ,Bute Creek Can The above li8tad environmental document wci�s subad teed by the State Clearinghouse to numerous State agencies for—review. The review has been completed, and there tre r no cotMilent.s on the environmental document: This letter vorifies your compliance with environmental rcv,iew requirements under the National Environmental iaol,iQY Act and/o.' the California Environmental Quality Act. Tkiat4t you for Votij; cooperation. S i.ncerely, ll William G. Kirkham Management Systems Officer �� State Clearinghouse 66.: REMARKS F F r F F Federal Rrgronal Cd incil CA -189' Da►nor type -to. the left of dotted line, COVER gtEETfor FEDERAL ANT APPLICATIONlAWARD NOTIF TION- 1 APPLICATION DATE yr ma arid. other Proiect Reviews-SIME OF CALIFORNIA sday � ITEVs T=3t TO 8E COMPLF TED BY APPLICAf.IT 2 FEDERAL EMPL6Y5R ID NO. A PLICANT-Organizzutinat Unit 4, ADDRESS - Street or P Q:: ;Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive $a CITY -6`.. COUNTY 7_STATE 8_ ZIP CODE g, PROD TITLEINO. Catalog of Fed Domestic As'stance) Orovi1Ye Butte C 3'596, ,�,f.'i�if TD TY*E QF ACTIONTYPE OF CHANGE (Complete of 10b or 1Cc was checked) 14. EXZTltfG FED'GRAlfr ID ` ew c LJ 1.0increased Dollars 72 . Increased 1a3. ❑Modificat(arxOther Scope Chang F t -T 11b, ;b onttnustions 0Decreased Dollars b- 13 Decreased Duration b T Cancellat`on F yr mo 74.APPLICAN.TTYPE FUNDSREDI/ESTEIrFerChanyrrStnwOnryAmruflncl+Ja;Drf•1.7 ` Enter Letter 15_ AEjlUESTED FUNDSTART 19_ A. State F_ School District 20. FEDERAL ( j s -.00 S.F(JNDSOURATIONMartths)i B_ Interstate G. Community Action AgencV '21.STATE •00 s yr- ma C_ Sul -State Dist H. Sponsored. Organization 2Z LOCAL r Js - -00 x = 17. ESt PROJECTSTART ice _ D:'Cour ty l.. Indian 23. OTHER r Js __.00;. ^ _(ManihsP E_ City J'_ Other(SpecifyinFiemark 21.TCtTAL,f2U27,27z3j r i 00 AlS,ES'r_PROJECTDURATIOAI EF TITLE OF - 1 25.8R j _ . APPLICANT'S PROJECT RFZOW TNG F ORFS' ST RANCH AREA _ �. } 26. DEfCRIPTION'" OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT (Purpose] EIR is for the rezoning of the Forest Ranch.. -Area located innorth- east portion of Butte Co.. Intended to prow az appropriate zoning r Clas> ficatio2l for area im: Orde"r to achieve consistency between T General Plan land use recommendation, the Open Space and Conser- vation Elements of the General. Plan and County zoning. 27 ARFA;OF PROJECIr.INVACT (tridicale City, County,State, etc,) STATE- COUNTY, MULTI - WI Wi P ��T Butta Courity Q L� rC'7OUrar Yes Yr- 4 yb 01 o e1 s. 28-CONGRESSIONALDISTRICT 29. Environmental Assessment Recluirad. 3G. CLEARINGHOUFE(S)TOWHICH SUBMITTED O{ Applicant Districts Impacted ByFroject By StatefFed'erat Agency? a"X,State b QArea Wide co None 31'- a NAMENITLE OF CONTACT PERSON: b ADDRESS -Street or P. 0- Box�c TELEPHONE NO. iLawrence J. Lawson 7 County Center Drive:,. Oroville 31.d )!§ ENl ij$ONMENTAL DOCUMENT REVIEW REQUIRED YES NO Q Yes Statement (Report)' Attached (2 e W"l the project regoire ' relaption? -YES h 1 projecr is physical in nature or requires an environmental document, list the U. 5_ It Envir nrtlental Tmaacr copies) R .tEIR E_I Final-EIR NO Geologic Survey Quadrangle map in whichth fDoesyau-acSancyhavea civil rights a firrtsative R.N tine Decfaration Attached (20 copies) Forwarded project is located. F None.attached:-Document Will Be Orr rYES actiorzpolicyandplar.? 1`7NO 171Approximately gIs O ect covered °'y5• tIpIVV?' Mon. Day Year f; No, Q Federal Program. Does Not Require Art Environmental, Document O j� roject Exempt Under Stater Categoricat Exemption, Class`_% (f yes is MOA exxecuutted? {f, I YES Q NO Q - 1 . iTFMS 32 38 TO BE COMPLETE D BY CLEARINGHOUSE r r MULTIPLE 32. Ct. 4RINGHOUSL tD �� CLEARINGHOUSE II 33. a"F(CTiO"k BASED ON F EVtEW OF r 33. b ACTION TAKEN - tF--�l ��pp c Ovvaivetl. '1`;' STATE APPLICATION) >; A t(`�(( ( {�,-, jt i.L1�.6i_��{ [Gtification a'0vv;thComment -1 tDENTIFIFR (SAIL 1�l rQ :A . bQA Iicaiion �I�-1r��. OI br�WitfioutComment dLiUnfavorabfe State Number - (j F STATE WIDE County/ City Ping Area County," City Countyr C.ty Ping Area County! City County.,` City Ping Area Countyl City Ping Area +F 35.CL€AP.INGHOUSE Ping Area Ptng Area T IMPACT CODE � Yas W Na 2 36 STiSTEPLAN REQUIRLED37. FIECEIVtrJ : DATE ytr� Mo /n�a/v� �- F��,-�9 AT CLE ACTIO FlDA E isjr mo 61C . 2J1GN,,TUF1EOFCR0F_,9ICA Yes { 'fy/j No 38. FINAL CH ACTION DATE yr mo day R prr r Af lL�-.-i. LL�7I�l F ITE t1,. 29 42 Tri BE Ca%1PLLTF rt FtY APPt ICAN.T BFFI)RE. SENOtNG F ORM Tci FiE7EF?At- ACA NC! r 39. CE iTIFICATtON - the applicant certifies that to the best of his knowledge and. belief the above dataaretrue and. Check box if clearing,4 iuse form been by correct and filing of this has duly authorized the goveming.5ody of the applicant. response isattached. - A- Representative dTELEPHONE NUMBER 40. a NAME (Print orTypel r . I fxTi rLE cSIGNATUREai Authorized p f• 41". DINE MAILED: TO FEDERAL ISTATE AGENCY yr mo day i 42_ NAME GF FEDERAL j STATE AGENCY +y J ° TO WHICHTHIS.APPLICATION SUBMITTED 'r ITEMS 4354 TO HE COMPLETED BY FE DERA.L OFFICE EVALUATING AND RE-COMME.NDING ACTION, ON THE AFFt t,ATi()N 43. GFIANT APPLICATION IO 52. Application Recd. 53.a Exp Action nave 53-I* P„r rr Apf&,c ,lot I(Assignedby Federat Agencyt yr and day Yr mo day Always Complete at near d,.V 53.a OR b 44. G rANTOR' AGENCY Ft Amended.Applie. R Rev. Expected 54_ Exp, Action RevAsise R Subsequent Ret. to C ReceivedE ActioriDate - E APPlecant A V V V 45, OF}GANiZATI-ONAL UNIT -: R : I yr mo day - {- yr mu day yr mo day { yr trio day r s 19 t9 - - f 19 -' - 4& ADMINISTERING OFFICE 1 -T N- 19 19 S 19'T-�_ - .1 Y�J �._. - _r19 47. A$DRESS - Street or P. Ot BBox _ 48. CITY 49. STATE 50. ZiP CGDE 51. TELEPHONE NUMBER F R � _ ICEC4t`.b`,iG•r teRl3F z -e S3,`p'ITFIJt.y TtiE. Llltlk..a aifktCJ .LPfFitltalryL IFfi 141ANI APDL - ICA fr ,. ., _.-.-_...._._.... _ _ _._._...--...s�-.�..-. -" FWAL ACTION` ._.._.... FINAL DATES yr mo day FUNDSRPPROVEDfForChanges Show OnfyAmr.oftne.IF) orDec-14.% P Aarded b 0 Rejected c ElWithdrawn 19-- __ 60! FEDERAL A.VOUIVT (F }` fuadsJ ; ),-,--.00 55-a w jrj fL '56. FI NOS, AVAILABLE 19--- 61-STAFESHARE 57. ENDING DATE 19 - - 62 LOCAL SHARE r 1`S _00 58:. FEDERAL GRANT tO' 03 OTHER ( ) S 00 r 64. TOTAL (6a 61_ 62, 63) f 1 .00 _._.� 59. FOERAL FUNDACCOUNT NUMBER -- 55. MULTI,P=E PROGRAM LINK ( 66.: REMARKS F F r F F Federal Rrgronal Cd incil CA -189' Inter -Departmental Memorandwa ro. FILL FROM � i3itte County Planning Gomm%ss%dn„,, SUeJeTForQst-ranch Dexone (75-90) J DATA: November it 1975 At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planft `pa Coimmiss%°�.:-i held November5 , 19 75 , the, Commission cont tnued the h-aring on, the ,draft Environmental Impact Report and rezoning o the Forest Pinch area for ttao wReks ► to November 24 r 1975. G'J J ,/bat �•� ,, cl 1 NovoMbnn, 10, 1.975 r; Mr. K�nnoih 11 Roth � .1i Fixat National Holding Corodratian r 2521 Bl4rayno Bo1.ilpmard kaomit Florida "mar Hr. Roth*q. am writingin tin ,. thea zoningf th Foront o�nch, arca of 'ButttuCo regarding deacription you furA�i.,4h d with Zour .;letter ihdicatea that t tp .. property ii being coon idnrfW �� r TM-160 Zoning,' I have; �f a Onci.oc?d a copy of_that zoning clag-Ai 1a.2atton for you i or�- "�truation. At thp_ Idnvembf-r 6th Butte County Planning Cd � TiOgi.on mfit.nghc� Crxrnmi$Qxon. cor�titanrad tka tnottc�r until. I�ovetnbor 200,; 1`975. sh6,1d you 1wvt:� any' vdditx,dnal,, quo.�1:16n�j plea4e contact, LaUrpnco J4 t6w.mon r �� biro tur of pa.nnni 1 LTL: mo Ql ` r T 2521 BIS:CAYNE BOULEVARD MIAMI, FVL_0RI0A 33,,137 Tk,.1..�C.NS7N� 130B1 57x•3610 , October 27, 1975 County of Butte Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive Orov 'l.le, California 95965 Gentlemen: 1 appreciate your sending us the concerning concerning the planning commission for zoning on our propdFC : °'OTviously it; "is impossible for us to fly to California from Miami to be at this meeting. We would appreciate if you will send us the results of the meeting and how it has affected our property, Thanking you in advance and appreciating your cooperation, very truly yours, ,Yf 1. ~ Kenneth W. Moth Ti 22 Id,, f3: 3 1=., „I1h.8.t7:&lul, ° Sec: S: IE1/sSi,� excepting VRf llb therefrom the S/Z SE'/4 SE Vs and further excepting there- from 50% of all oil, gas, hydrocarbons or other minor, als as reserved and excepted in meed from Willoughby 'r: Grace et ux to Harold J, Powers, et ux, recorded May 91 1061 , In Book 1179 of offs, \\ clal Plecords at page 279, Said to nt cor0iinino 140 ares, more or less. Y r'X+,{ y;u "Ml. �;� .•r,. ti.. olti 4:,.,li lt..tu .w. «J: -.s - ` e�W+ .• .:,..d , ',,,,.. s � � ). (� r {( ,4 r}ll )�i l i . 1 •w I` . a. u�. h:.� 3a �y .. «.. v..C. .H.� ...µ r' ri i r• V I 1 w « . \\ X38. Kundikoff Georpe 100.0`10, 89. Kelley, Joe F. et Ux 75.2 .. 90 Bennett, Frank G i et ux :. 43.23 �I 91. Brown, Fo etall n 4075.20 92• G & M' Ranches ,, 9964 10 936 Johnscri, Cocil M. 11763.50 94... Joh=on, 0. i1. (P.MR.R. 280.) .00 l' 95- 8anto19 A. & J. K 2�201,60 96. Sorenson, bon << 300.00 7 ij 97 1 Gehrirlge=y E. W. � 19.00 9e. K. & Di Re �25. 0 , 99• Van bar Have, J. C. 440aOO 1 MACH 1975. i, 100}. Rooctodo, �auiae F. �519,3 1071`i, Coxroia, Prank Er. 3"3'•4 cr de.A �i_u _\S'. `CI i1r`il.:. " - 9 �C:1.YRV •, w -..;. . V NA C ADDRESS: ss R PkRC L NO. naso or FZ SID URTIAL STRUCT0ZRIS ACR GET zzcz APPLICATION MUST INCLUDE TIS: FOiLCGTIi`fGa T' f iL� y Title "Psport describing, each parcel or parcels on the TAX- roll and the ownership in- durlicatea Title .Report shall be not more than one(T) year old and: on legal size form 82f,I1. - -_ 2a _applications must be accor-ar _ed by z. fee . of Twent five, Y- ($251,00) Dollars for'; processing and recording_ This f ee shall riot be returned in the event the application is turned down by the county- _ ?_ Appications shall be submitted and bei -filed with the Agricultural. CommiE =ioner° on or before Dece ber Tl of each year in order that the agreement: 'vrll becoTMe efiective during the following year W J' FIov long ;ave yCit owned the land?� Was the projexty acquYsed-during. the last five (5) years? Yes A. If the answer if yes -s hour much did you pay for the property? (The amount paid for property is a voluntary statement by thie applicant and not required..) _ Is the land Listed for sale at the present .time?_ Are there any known mineral deposits on the: land?_� !'the answer is yes; List. the minerals 16Z yLj z BUTTE. COJt1TY C4. - . T f APPLICATION -FOR a -ND "AGRICULTURAL AGRF06ITS Aar.- /% ­7r Cct �5 PHON4 ADDRESS: ss R PkRC L NO. naso or FZ SID URTIAL STRUCT0ZRIS ACR GET zzcz APPLICATION MUST INCLUDE TIS: FOiLCGTIi`fGa T' f iL� y Title "Psport describing, each parcel or parcels on the TAX- roll and the ownership in- durlicatea Title .Report shall be not more than one(T) year old and: on legal size form 82f,I1. - -_ 2a _applications must be accor-ar _ed by z. fee . of Twent five, Y- ($251,00) Dollars for'; processing and recording_ This f ee shall riot be returned in the event the application is turned down by the county- _ ?_ Appications shall be submitted and bei -filed with the Agricultural. CommiE =ioner° on or before Dece ber Tl of each year in order that the agreement: 'vrll becoTMe efiective during the following year W J' FIov long ;ave yCit owned the land?� Was the projexty acquYsed-during. the last five (5) years? Yes A. If the answer if yes -s hour much did you pay for the property? (The amount paid for property is a voluntary statement by thie applicant and not required..) _ Is the land Listed for sale at the present .time?_ Are there any known mineral deposits on the: land?_� !'the answer is yes; List. the minerals 16Z F sP,5 NT IAND USS7 /l 3r HORTICULTUR . -Descr ption or typsa` �__E '_ %r,=� Acreage Total; 2- FAD CROPS OR MIGATED PASTMIZI Deseription or type 1<- Total* j d COMEMIAI< TQ- R GRAZING fi Description or' type f - Total. ?and is being used. bye Ovmerd - _- Lease(Chec.'c One) If Ir_"d is g-•azed,. what is the average an :ial carrying capac-Ifi y per acre? _ What 19 he: average numb_eY-'" of animals being gazed on the property per yeax 3;;'' n timber sand,_ when was it last logged? 4 OTH-b2 I11TFOF. fATION CR �PLANATIONT TO SIJFFOR"tiFPLICNTION; - ILL— The above statements are^ certified by the undersigned to=tee.true and corrects and. that this land is used for the intensive production of food or fiber, or the land is used to support the agricultu_-a1 economy -and has public value. Lime: 00lJ Signature: 10%68-50' —'` -F-C-SENT LAI -1j) USS Description or t,yTe g i �-Aecrea g Total' 2> FLM CHOPS OR IR IGATEED PASTURE—. Description or type Total: 3. COMERML' T P GRAznm � Description or type �mss' Total. Land is being used, by-; Owner Or Leased Check One) If .land is grazed. what is the average� animal carrv4-ng capacity per acre? rr What is the average number :of animals being g •azed on the property per year? 4, - If / If timber lands when -was it last logged?-- 4, ogged?4, O= aFOEMMON OR =LANATION TG SJPPORT APPLICATION,. r - i�` GIn'r /:7 i Ear The above statwents are certified by the undersigned to be true STATE of CALIFORNIA. of ss. COUNTY OF Dtitte ) s 4' E G*I.I>.A70?g- : before mL-,, the undersigned. a Notary, Public in and for cor r {anY fs'8 tos and Jacqueline K. _ m said State;. personally apprarrd' .�• ��__.��..._.__.,�.—_ a= Santos r LL ig known to me to be, the person° whose: name t �. P-- rteOFFICL,LSEALsubscribed` to the within instrument and acknowledged to me t �. '•„YSTAL M. F RMON VA cs NOTAP.Y PUBLIC-CAUFORUTA -�- that he executed the' same_ ._ oL! t E COUNTY CV W[7NFSS � hand and afFidaf seat_ "`°'"' Ya�AmmisstonEcpiresluiYi6,1973 t 6F3 -5[j CV - E 183 East 6th St, -h-=, Calif; 95926 a` Signature s.'� armor Name- -yped or Printed] (This arta for official notariat seal) y JOHN W. HAMC3Y LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR CALIFORNIA-NEVADA P. O, BOX HH 9437 OLIVE STREET PARADISE. CALIFORNIA 98989 /i' PHONE 877.65253 '"'��"�'•i". "ne.�•��K. �'}.r 4n*'. � :+. rF xt�l�xt-I. nfi�.h�'? ^;r"Fyaly r.d, .L.1« .1. },,. ?Y�S�ti Y1r..�. 'L1a, wn•q "�r„1,� ',��''iM�"+"ry'"`r 5 • r. !'.»�f ..te f1'" ,,a "t'i. 4y .ba_ _ {..1. 7.� •i .1. r.. .�.��•r (ai Y;a»r.,.�l.'14w '✓,C rt .. f�. ti �„ •r�',�'' fti..ti �� �i 6iT COUNTY PLAb1i196 COIL Tnr�- 8,1n+,or MAY 21 1975 Nov. 3,1975 Butte County Planning Commission and -�The Butte County Board of Supervisors Gentle)pen: I am the owner of approximately .23_a res of land in Forest Ranch located directly behind the commercial use area on the Northwest corner of Highway 32 and Robert E.ie.e., Drive. This is identified as Assessors pa.rcel�.Ob3-11-o= iNTER-DI=PARTMENT fF kUeH� aFY eP€CIAL, 5o WbIC..';brLJOW i i `1,41 BOAV OF SUPERVISORS' tr�/Tp �aU�YTT n�Arra COUNTY OF BUTTE �I ' 0M. REFERRAL NOTICE ROVrl,� Date June 5, 1975 �y To: Planning Department and' Plannin�*'=Commission Subject: Letter of Clarence. Schreur has been referred to your Please study the matter. For your _iyforma tion Please take the `t,`ollowing action: t' Report to Board on r Advise action takbli sign below, and, return this notite to the 1 clerk of the Board of Supervisors. J Signat ire of DeparthiiBdt tread „ 9DAve , .ayr ?7 Chair ,qa. , B• Mrd of Supervi„ars II Buttb uo%inty,,Calii p arsir: f��losed are seven copies of an a_Oplicat�.on for .zonans 4.'c; pa.rcel of land in .rarest stanch;, also ,r� copy of a letter �,,rit ten to Mr. Claude Willis rel'- dive to the state- 'ment made by `him, (out of order) , at th6---public hea.ritig on this date concerning-' the proposed on of thi1 in-V terim zoning,, of certain erects of Forest Ranch. T was -Ore-sent at the time,. of the '.hearing today, May 27+Y1. , and did not ask to be ;heard when the meeting was opened to the publ..c, as I Favored the proposed extension of my ter m zoning., even th u 'h ii nu`t'ir rxevr�r, of an ever-all 5 —'Iez zoning as proposed. However, I was very disturbed by the fact that 'Nilli was permitted to speak to the board' again after the meeting had been closed to the pub- lic and a motion hau .been made tip extend the interim zr.;n !g . I was especialllr disturbed because the utatement ',,-,hich he trade was not As ,a r. a jor- pr,)Pertyi o'Piner in �iorest ;Punch 11k,,aG rP.1,rf:r that al r) b.I c_hearing- hai r �mre_or� _d, d no ” at "e end ib ¢, c all tQ `dit;11 ;a3T11T1 ii.k3”'` a r:eet :��t? , aazum ;l " a Le as =t nd f ur �hermore I am not in favor of a �la.nket zonir;: o�' he area in t�ltestJ ori n8 e forth I the enclosed '1E.'f.7uest, :..r. Vill,is d��,�s not �..� set �.���^th 1.:„ represent the Groper-".-)y o+,vnerz o� _-o'rsst ?arch Irealize that my request for zoning; cannot be; handled at this time ixk view of the index 'm zoniriF, but rospect- tally ask ghat, this be placed on File or Such time as ti! e sub joct is '�� in f 'brought up for consideration, I plan tfs attend any meeting e,slled for that purposed to per+ sonally Present the request at tha'i>' titre. I Y:� a- 4 truly , , i ay croe Schreur `f r N 1'510 Yo vi c- Lave v4yX'c.C11r,f9,( x'.11 I596y} 1',.t r 27,)1975 5 Beard of Supervisors f r OentTe`men:, I am the owner of a portion of the Southerly H of Section 6 T 23 DI R3E Irl.D,D SIA, v,*hich is located on the Horth gest Corner of I ,,�iy, 32. a"d Robert F.Let Drive; Forest Ranch, Calif. I h=,,reby respectfully request uhat cont iderat'ion be gii;.sn to the following zoning, for there�-Isons stip- whited bol.ow. Parcel. A': q one acre parcel knoi-,m aqloot ;rl of the `\ Forest 'Ranch Chit "� to be zoned Coramer-c-]=al. 1. This parcel was oriiqinally designated n as cer•mercial property subdivision. 2. The parcel is' yldjacent to the present !. conmerciall.y zoned a.Y.i,d in usE property. 3. 'The Parc; l ion di.rectl,y Ooro-s the Robert-' L .1.. e.,: Drive �'� nrt a rc' \ ,'.kot.�iur ar)'I and servLce station,both r andp�r c�m� �� �lciia ren 4. Vpxcol is tete unl,y one e-v,-jlabl.e for commercial use ilt*hi.n the pr6tet:t commercial area. 5. ir�;.te parcel is �Yrrisui ta.lilc for residential us6 because of the fore,<",tj.ihr,. Parcel B:h,=bro ;ir,.etely, 2'2 ac es. immediatell nnFnt _jto the . commercial property and bobor. derini-74 som.. distance rinr�o' mHVIY, 32 for e sae K Reque ,t that this be zoned ,m tivi-�;h minimum lot size o L,v�inq C l d.cre-. Unit -I"l str1, Tiiccbarcel is corZ'ti•zuous With iiorest' Punch The parcel It al, ri� tracross livy. 32. Prom a similar high derslt r ��1rie��k;ialarea. a sTh-10 re[t acubi,L1epolicy ©x" confirni.ng high dens ty re; i.derttial t,���isting simila+; ly zoned. are.,; fib. Adequate proof c:I nw,11,*xabLe water is pro- vided ro :vided by v n existin,, 4;re11 which ha t ' beer cupplying all, o f the ��o,tr; r need- of all iihe r. )m:rtercia,� buildings plus r • � vi�lential. roll tal un! - :n �'or sevA- .,SI yearn w A .��.: era.l �.e41 _rL, lie,",. .ell will be Cupp{Lying, thole neeo.s in 'the f�ut`.ure, y x'r�..r''nv trig? Eii'.lu�i�Tl:s well. nn 'I'+tie subjeot rop ,4 lei f �++ Uf`JG 1.n t ho roqu Irom onto of the r v ,Yiected wyyy r��t��,,'7r .Y'Tfh���.r, ;=ild w?aeri?..CT1 r�2 s`�1]�cS�.. Y1ich h...:r e xperie.b.cecl nrs�,dz- �� �.nc ere Zy Yo,jurs , i 1 15)0 a'curg Ave. Pa"dise ,Calif 95969 elaY 28 ,1975 Mr. Claude 'O.,`Lls Highway 32, i o est Ranch, Califs 9594�i Dear 'sir. 'Millis s As ,you )snow, Z`;was prel.3ent at the meeting called by the Board of Sups2rvisors of tfutte Co=ty to consider a xcruunencia�:dr� chat the Interim cM3nP of certain pori:�,ons of Forest F»anch be extended for a' period of time. I did not speak in opposition to the extension of the interum zoning as I appreciate the fact that the planning commi.ssi, on needed more time to cotapl,'ta their 'study, Hovrever, I was very disturbed over the fact that you Insisted on being heard after the meeting had been closed to the publicf and even more so by the erroneous statement which you mate to the board. Assumirg that you did hold. a meeting of some property owners of Forest Ranch,., why r as I not advised of such a meeting? I am ei ty v+'n a d i f ou wi sit to .",5 sent the ma Tor proper , o er n , �( property owners , every one c�hcerned 8,hould have been notified in writinj so uhat ti ey .-mulct have an opportunity to q.ttend. As far as x aid c'rrcer .ed, anu have never been 6h6sen to . represent the propQrt-, owners of Forest Ranch, and therei'or, were comvle telae out of order in claiming, to be their representative. ; For your further i.nformati.on, I ani not in favor of a blanket zoning of Forest Ranch properties as TSF -2 Zt . y request rt In properties which I own is m intention to �•e nest ce to be toned, otherwise, for good and valid re2sono, Should you decide to hold another public meet1no,"for the purpose of di,lcussing future zoning of Forest Ranch prop er'tles please advise me in •ir" iting so that I may have the opportunity to attend. This Will preclude you from advising the Hoard of supervisors. that It was unanimously Agr'eed' to : ppr^ve T�r1-2 zc5ni�tgo .Failure to notify me, will discredit as a repres,entatiVe of the property o`snk).rt b A copy of 'this cottinunication is bein g:� sent. to the !�nar of �=coerv.sorss , tvily, Clarence 8rhreur ,, t� r, r� 11 Ave � r4radiu 0 a I i f . 95;a 9 t,:o.y 2-71;,, 1r)?5 Chairman, Board of Supervizors i Atte Co?lnty, Calif. r Dear air: closed are s even t -un es of an app icati7n for .zoning for parcel c,f land int Ranch; also n copy, of a letter ;vritten to Nz-- Claude refills relative to the s4ate- ra91,117, made by him,'(dut ;of lorder) , at the public hearing on 'his date concer.nir:a the proposed extension .oz" the in - on acrid zo-ing of certaiij areas of :wrest Rancho a y Y, t, the title of the hearing; t'hday, +Iay 27th., x •res �uresent a and did no as;c to be heard two en the meeting +Nas opened to the ribllc, as T favored the proposed extension of in- Perim zoning-, ever, though T am not in favor of an otter. -all blark,it zonino, as`pronosed. However, i xas very disturbF Iby the facet 'that i,7r. Iillic was, perm, Itted to speak to the �t 'board' a&aln after the meetitn"i had been closed to the is ar.d a. motion had been mane to e:ttend tie interl cn ng. 1 was especially disturbed because the suatement rich he 'mado was not tpr-9 !�s a na4- r prorL;y owner sn r ' L .ani I f'!c"t5 never vise t1h t a t�11b _ , <�.wc' ti� d W. 6i hearing had be -en called to diGo-isz zon!k,,g. ih ero fir T did `not at $nd !Cl. rI+ee is y e�atlm�_t�', one "'' +a eZC1y I?; ', .Liw-hermo'-e i `am not, in fa'mr of a ilaft et z.oriing o;the area, in question seU w � u,i in, tt1e,' enclosed Y't?53`.-c�S"<;. z,y . .`iil�.i5 dies not 7� ;�yeBeTt the pro, rtu ,:)rest Eanch. retMze that inv-'� request for 'zoning Oannot be ' handled. lt u i'iv t? ;1� ir', yllew of -ho ].Tlterim zoning, but respect J.017 ask that;pais , be placed on file for such time as the subject 16- 'bL9,�iri brou.:`ht up for consideration. I Mein, uo attend any, m,�eting called for that purpose aiid to per- `3reaent ;Ithe request at ti'iat time. ��M�nce c}".reur 1 0' Yo 1.1 rv' Av e Crad i c; 0 , Cna 1 i 95960, I..'ey «27 , 11/1 ? 5 Boat 6 of SU-0ervisors 3utte Co Lint-,'. Calif Gentlelhent I am the oviner of a Portion of the --,S-'q,utherly JL 2 of Section 6 T 23 M R3E 14.11,,,B L14, which'i�S located on the North West Corner ox',i Hv,,y- 32 and Robert E -Lee Drive, Forest Ranch, Callif. I hereby respect,";ulllr request that consideration be given to the foI,Lowing zoning., for therea8ans 8tip- ulated below. Parcel A. -A . ne acre parcel known as Lot 2#1 of the sorest Ranch�­Jnit -,Ll to be zoned Commej�clal. I. This, ,oarcel arras ora ,t'nilly designatbd as cor�nercial property in the si�&Jivisl'01'1, 2. The paxcol is adjacent to the ro-esent commercially zoned and in use property. 3. The parcel io dire lti,�• acz1q.9s the..'Iobert ,,IE,!-Z,e, Di�ive from a roatepurzant service st-ationboth tunO_er 4, The pa"Ircel is tht`, one a:,tailable for commercial use within 'the presont commercial area. 5. The ,Parcel is unsuitable fotresidential tttp because of Parcel B% Approximately 22 acres i.-tamediately adjacerit to `the commercial 'prol�er-:y and bordering),, Hviy,32 for ,­ I I ie. Reauest that this be zoned ,,O.�Ile distance Horth o sn 40'1. with minimum lot oil of one (1) acre, 1. Thi-. parcel Is contiauous with forest + i VRanch Unit Subdivision, 2. The parcel is aloo directly across Hvjy, 32 from a similvir high denolt 4,egid'ontial orea. 3. 'Thi s. the ,policy of confining hip density res idoiltial aretir, to existing similarly zoned *-co.oi 4., Adequato PrybA: water is Pro- v 1dec by or. cxistin.�, 7 -011 v.,hich ht�s bcen. supplyint, all ,!, I I C, of the s%ater needs of all the oownprclal buildings plus vTnWential rt)ntal unit. ff"or. �eVeral years. A no, , * ;. e %%-ill be theseieeds? in the f6utureo , lvell en th�� prr)'per"-y for itch oxIotin- 11 - LA thn of 'he r'pouec­ted Ift-I aroi!. "pu..,xoph­ -nd bo JII,ti( arc jMI, _rCT ,inch" L-J_,V_6-T, vhich h a e: IMIerienced no dif- to *. I , -4 'r 10 VI t . For your ,further a.nfc��rmation, I aiu no -1; it�� favor of ,a blanket zoning of Forest Ranch properties es as TX -2. it is my intention to request car- yin properties which T o*m` to be zoned otherwise* f+ r goad, and valid reas-ons. Should you decide to hold another public meeting for the purpose of discussing fut fire zoning of forest Ranch prop erties, please advise me in writing so that 1 tiiay have ,the attend. This will trcly advaisiq and of Sapervizwrs that it unanimously agreed to approve TIM -2 zoning Fa' I re to notify tae.'; will discredit you as a representative of the property owners. A copy of this communication is being sent to the Board of Supervisors Yours truly) Cly Ar,,ce Schr Ur J, !j,;) 0 ,Yo ung Ave, F -.realise ,C�alf . 95909 rid '-fay 28 , 1975 p, tt a 0laud -J! W11,11S High�Nay 32, Forest 'AgnccY ,, calif. 95942 n Dear sir. Willis, As ;you know, I `tAs present at the weeting calledby the Hoard of Supervisors of .:Butte County to consider a recommendation that the ;interim zoning of certain portions of Forest Ranch be extended for a period of time-iiI did not speak ,in opposition to the extens:lon of the interim zoning as I appreciate the fact that the planning commission needed more time to complete their . study, E! Howe'veril was ver, disturbed over"the fact that you insisted on being heard after the meeting had been closed it to the public # and even more so by the erroneous„ statement which you made to the board. Assumi»g that you did hold a: meeting of some proparty owners of. Forest nch.q why was 1 not advised of such a meeting? I Mn a major property owner and 'if you wash to reprasnt the property owriers , every one concerned, should ,have been notified 3n *xr ting so Neat they ;vou7Rd have an opporttimity, to attend. As far as I am concernedynu have never been. chosen to represent the property owner of Purest Ranch, and therefor were completely out o:e order it 'claa.ming to be thein representatives . For your ,further a.nfc��rmation, I aiu no -1; it�� favor of ,a blanket zoning of Forest Ranch properties es as TX -2. it is my intention to request car- yin properties which T o*m` to be zoned otherwise* f+ r goad, and valid reas-ons. Should you decide to hold another public meeting for the purpose of discussing fut fire zoning of forest Ranch prop erties, please advise me in writing so that 1 tiiay have ,the attend. This will trcly advaisiq and of Sapervizwrs that it unanimously agreed to approve TIM -2 zoning Fa' I re to notify tae.'; will discredit you as a representative of the property owners. A copy of this communication is being sent to the Board of Supervisors Yours truly) Cly Ar,,ce Schr Ur 41ovember fi, 1975 Mr. F. 11enning, Jr. 48 Al.amnda Atlierton�, CA �4*J25 i far Imo. 11t nni mg:, to J Last might %lir* Planning Commiv- a� �hplt3 ;�.ta rirnt is hpaarin on th, Voarn t Ranch R-zone Prop,i}qn1,. .Zany cornra�ntp J�rr� roceivod, Both pro, ant? cone Tb- hnoring ,k,`aq e+ontinuod for t��o wookT ftr%t, r:o' that,(M"or^ :information cox--c-ril.Ing trator availability, could bp,;; addrad to tho I.I2. ; and v-recon(;, nothat landownOr - could cl' mmea" t to thr, npr-cif c, propound zonon r-commond^d for th-lir propnrt7, � l� xnclud�d h�rr�in i�.. a draperition of '1~t�1»40 and - `PIi�r-c zone p � , rocorwi ndod for our areal .. From the comms ; nth r�cr'ivod at thr Connign3,on h-aria Iphavr, a for:,lin'l that'th� ITT-160 propos sI tell , br,, l:oalignod to T i CEO. If and ithon `phi, - lmppl�rny i�will maks ,+:tiro to not#.f'y'you. 3houl.d you dwii.rn tho T.1T'-40 al�-,bcation, Or any alt�rhativn zonop plea` o notify tho Planning C�,�mniq§ion by lrattw�r ,.. bofor>w Nov,-mbtt�r 20th. � Alamo e�rycl.o ray arra appligationi ,jnd �atnp1mj,-?oto `ton for rnzrjnin . Tho ataplicat-166 fur;^ ar, .10,0071,or rr�rit`�{a�+ran i'�l 110V es aur; $100.00 for rMz' 1is�NY. if the lar""g� acrna�b:mini,f;vnn airs al'ritable for tho' time-i bri,1kog, ,.a rPzonr% application 66uldr, boy fillsd atlj a fututo dat"� than ,}rou ia`v+� thorn dpfinitivq plaanc for your l6nd other material.t arc- nvailablo. cone;rnTng your;(` opoa;ty, -howPvpr 0 there to a chargo involved Wo Ana-gaor Parcol Napa, ghp,wiri your parcolq available at 50� P'adh,, A' compo titm, rtapi ataowr3:ti� too zona. prgopoGalq in yout oro6 in also availablA at 500. ;YTM11lly , 7 avail, for a coot of $2.54. A chodk iiladl? payable �., , 'Butte- to the., :Crna ouvo r of county bill have tp 'bo rocciivad bofor 'W(% clbn Dona any of tlio abovt�'�itol q. '< if wry: can be of any othor pi(�aot)4 contact un. �incr�r�ly, ` "il, Y, envonrnn,tlnord,r>ar i _. „ a) Aoi. „� J � zc.� ” , L �c .,;�„ �c .. � - Cc..�tf rte"".- I�r�-•c; �� / �t.�,. (' �, • .: "�" �� � � �� 1 `f .G � �'-. �, ,tit C �`� � 4 ._,. lt.. - r IZ.Ja L '"c t : r' 1._ ) _� t'Cc_L . . L4 Z 71 p.. `.Ku "'ca« ! �i "". "�....� ,L �` K«' �, I `•`l: Wim.. . c r tYL. -b �. �J � �. ���` K. y:, •Y`J.✓.. °-��yiY�7{�i_¢L. f �Ir^ ( i L y �� �` W i.rvt � ��'u A 1 YYY"' a J ffij' � - t t V `-' , e 1•4 .Y i { 1. C C xi c{ z l `Y" ��`✓' �. 'L ✓ CL t -j ao'� AX '"r N W r 1, 9ith-. s , n November 6, 1.975 „County of Butte Planning Commission County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 Centl,emen: 1 I own a roximatelYy four acres, with approximately 900 feet pp fronting; on Highway 32, with access ;from Stagecoach Road, the � f orme:' Route 47 , in t�lze Forest Ranch; s r.eK'%;. �r,: �.rh, :X s bP ing con- sidered for, rezoning by, t}le_ SxOn rl � .ha'ated in,E��:' z, ..�. u� I have owned, this property for approximately 20 years. t When I first purchased the property, is tixabej�ed but unt �m roved,° I grew Christmas trees on i t %nd sold them commerci11 property i on the well traveled, Because so mue�.. of 'nYfronts residential area, The'factythat� it also frontsta county road ` i state hi hwa , it is actually valuable asta limited access acreage such as mane x.� not makes it even less so, Any small ,, sufficient for agriculture nor for the growinn or harves�'ting of, timber, The only zoning that makes small acreage such as mine use- ful Therenaree future presently the very fewismallrholdings, o f, property along, , Highway 520 but are rather held in large: creage excee04ng 4 ' acres and sometimes involving hundreds of acres The teas ab 1 0. zoning would be for commercial, all along the"iiiiited access h;lghvA�v for a reasonable depth. �N,i.th the small acreage I own, I ask that this property be, zoned ill-Cs This would allow me to use the property as I had intended, as a small nursery and gift shop, I have worked as a nurseryman and landscaper and forester most of my adult life, It has always been my intention to return to set ixp this busi- nests when the property around it began to develO!t to the point o f i.table. wher�.e such a busineas Mould be pro , Very truly yoU:1. HOt 5 A , ATKINg