Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT. 75-9 1
m 1w pp��Yyyy,ffh� //��}}+ngypp !d P� I r1 �q�{ �y �P �.,7E.LsiXT1,N'G �iV/'ALIS' 'ON �tJ���l'ARX. � A II Planninhis II 11 t I uCS Btatste Goun . Ca7u� sszon 41 a r,rr �.�.t'7.......,w. �� l AiiI�ti 7 Couehter �,,,, .�. I ow,t4 i various . _ �' E' OF APPLrCAT C' N Re zone to_, S .,..w«.»+....n.a..r ,%.y..W.w, 771 7� +�..cr•..w., '-...r.� If '�l..wrjl:>,tR�.;�p�{Wlw:ar�iwm�.'�tl+�Wr�Gwla..,w..`wy fw,♦•,L.lugry,�r�+�r,1w...s..wm--,.-:_+,.�.«.+un...:,...»Y.K+.W.. S' , s•C+iMOCATNo Eheati"t ff��oq' �t t W actta:a+rs +mews ,g{y+ .�aw�..� �wr.� ll l �""ya#W+rh+lknnvkrr� J� --- li .www�.�4nk+lmo a. r.rs . j�I�� if l .(L.>'ew:r .".,w.w„p,rau..:an...v.4*� _ _ — •.�i�a+s=m.rw{�.�.+w+s�+w. �u��r�. `�1I r^F �vul1(lu„a�'a�'w.a.+Y,haw.iila'y�l.s,l�l+»d�lunn�Wo.,� >W+�{' 4 i e l,`.r.,.r.�s '� .{t •aawti.+v.r�ir�-ex .�t _���r==-iw�r� �Y.ia..+tkr �64>IF��P+.1'�kW.nusrd.i }^w��wr 1 w " PRt8°ENT ZONING Al � A' i CA OTd tt itrle VV: o �� rl f' .:. e r 1 a.ii..WWrNnaiatla..iri ra.�LL.u, t�.t#EWMt#F i• iu r.tCY+�•'�"�...•.�+—.�w�wAw tllt D,ATt tIOVXC i�S M��T-xD i.IWquwi vtiwx�Yi�Y++wtwwu( Mm1flJiteu YLyryuGV11.W-•W,i�+a 1`„' —:M• 1 .. � r l '] 19AS tN`T OUT - �---�.--�4�4.�pw�+,•��.u+6.gMr-++Pilr•��+�V75�rsrf�Wu I wrwlWgwr..Lrrxr+ws41•b+'+5M^rah U�r,MYwfwv�M1 RT{iYJ1�Tt�v'1D �t P, A_l_lyl�tiL E^J ��w!!��{{ t.l ' , S. E� 0 <.. .. 4. ,..� +y'' r• F . � ` +r'�'' 41I '�I W 4'WN G O' k�a... r.+i.r.....+i-wr�...wur / ;r ASS 1 AF,«�N(9� r /!1 � .!>nT Ww,��Iw4Iwpl��W.c.: rrsa�,a:w - .,..W�...,i� A osw `• r” � wwn�b�. 11. f+�+:+atv�i.riipul. i � '. t•,��dIE �.(1��-�?t�W�ant�f4'lwrrw��lryA!r..rw�t%ww w.,4.JMWri,� ..r�F.w.a�.+.y.+,+Ywaws..w�.wuu:su...u�.v. v� Y �y+ y,� AM, n pry. GoMMItgI N AM,1, ('�{,• }� yy{{ i s r `rp Ia` �' nil �, �, `,, •' 61owWu1 F ,,,,,,a��`�.wre.,..' �Ifi�s�:.inW��.�+�el7Cs • ly�''aeAx 4i4.aa4�4 �,...z.�lr>+u.aycrrA«.LLaWsa:maid:Www.:...arWwrir.',3�+-F>�>«.a..�ulma,.�:.W�wur.:.]w 1� .`I ff,l, 1 _ • •lr;✓;r..u,aww.LatC�lk=r'�-W4a3�sY��laiMUFnw.w.-.lwjjiW.add;k,...:hL�w,n..f, �bil�uricj,."{Yt�'w i�gh;:wx1 - ffr}`l�� i,rW�x.�w:�++wlA � �s+s,Y+wy.N:�u+huu.a..i.wr.M+gw.0 wl �i rm., •���1'C:S.t Ter i ' _ { I • r.. rte �' (�� IJ � ,. - rWii+aA'--a.W.�tdLbu�+.�+rrebttr+.J7a6vbd.--e.a.��s+�'.W u*+�'W4�ar�. .vs�Jra.ve�w�,ar�.k th+.�+r+.��rr:su� wMrvv�.•r�rwwurulu{raw.:r'.. �.� ., ACT! ON t3T���C; 01:02 ADOPT ` ! ,+{ Q, 1 ;y+a �rk•+a.:.Jlij .�'<'C:rrt,..«t i.v�.:f. :..aFw.�r':.i&.�+r6W.. E `.j'54Y++la,:L3w�.rw;iu6J1.1�..�++ny.�WvwWa.�w i ,A t t v,. N� t. l ri f>f �P� u `y:fit TION FOR ,APPLICA, �l �Ii k Al r ) �i Butte Cou .. �'la�anir�r��c®�nirtrrisso If I earing date l Cii£t is r Action by Planning,6mmi'4t,ion ?` I> ysr pp'Attjon by ;BoarSupbtvjsnrs� cS �l.�ll S'" 2 NT ZONING �1 i Ass s�or Mdp Baak' Pdi d No, _ Parcel 'ff ; FtQUEST;'� Recne to S-, & 5-1 „ �, ! �{ l j X11, - Al a✓''�la a, �' w 'I.� I I JIf ii I I���pi ` AFLGAAA�,'h'�i`�.r��Mt`�.'"Coy Pnk4irig. Coiun3ss�ah� PWe�Ni.� 54�-Gds Vj ' ADb ES�(i1,`C'<'�', , ,. ' t 'bt' br. Oji: Iti- le ,,_CA 5955 I� ' �1�',0 STA7iS, ��lEi''�lF!PLICh��+1TNTEREST W PReitetYZoilyhS '! O NN'�R` a I:. bus ,1 IIADbktSlw( DES TION :OF �tZC)��[tTY...? Y ,, Cr a CoYia sei. Rd, W cf etre. , and N o existing '!_ rie, nrOEeast o Cly co.l��t1.�.� r fit „ COn{:3�l1�ng. ���A� off{. 60 � '1� p�rc ► +1110 Car ,less�i�� UK EXPLAIN FULLY Pi+AS�N K A SPECIAL USE: �_� J �� ru''�i a� ac ' wig b c�ri�.esic�et rtbt.. bv�nib n;aL an. x�a ase ny, y tir hbt+ve�Pe d+�i+�if`to�f 6yfhb uhder�i��nhd LAW9tlgC:C a LAW8rogI 'PLAT I�164d DT,Tt 3U'�;v.LANNN COrissToN,,�;. t � Signht►it'e b�`AppNl�t'' �� ' ,l f�ll '�; .�« % P 'r�4. 11 1 ,� LDu 4 �, Nt1i` i PInnie u6niit �teWCi c i0 k ar mane oP e� Ih thy► I atauh4 hewn -b6I a },(e f o �C6i� Idly o , � tlsb `o u etallrer�' ►,lol�pl't�h h�S�Ving th+ lu atibh �f � tisf.wq nhdlptd bdet! 1p.t�i�CtM��kdt fit �lM otd,;dii"'i��"Ajjbn tl (tt.'a �t►�eb� yi �. �iO�JD�fe'3� �Ir��.�:.r,.a. 9 � r ,.' t }�,, ,..,',E a .: .- ,. , �:, r ,� db�i iit+•Inri:r�: ''.rwi.,w.,:i�ll 1. (11 1 I �' r i� �iiY..YV� i II . t Y3+wl i r y ni'++rrw+nrbrw�aws"- rhiiiw �d(��e L`L k ��', �1,._'ll��wwwrwiY��Y�i1w`it�l �� X �;y T hc� :: r , t , utty"y9.7j,'xti «�ktacr�.approst�3nvrlMiit��7l y�O:� rZ ::a.0aa k el ii w cd ���r ,U??6;ovt,:v. idh isIto, pit j r4t �a#ViM :i;10 r6Yi , equire?o'n I 6t4S�alt,Mio'1Jd ► O1QSlab r th'.'�s addtiloail o c&, I 4 o n to _ ���e %,����►�,�.�nz�a+�n,�.��. 3��,��«�,���� �o�.���s�, o,��� e$ Crovillei a�„�r.4? 1t����IF klu� ,tl�'tkli '�0 5+�� �.ora;a fi�s5 he 01, ref e n iy o ' plate Prod � `a � for.( r' , o�m :i £: : ion of the »i4vers az oxo ��o r} 1 �, l Pm O f •. r 'Nail t v r a R ti bio V,`arious 1kro e"C T oar , a Ga Rezone from Injl '; to S-1 2 I_ ;1 s�� �C".t•+w�",..y+ j �'+.--^+fw...�,r+tib,�w^^�.+.«+.a'«-,.....�+...r......a.+�l+.i.:..w+«.»...'.,............:�.:,...,.r. . i ,: +r.?�...w....1..w..y«n ..+..:,3rr�r..rr+.=�✓....+.+a.a.....-rw.r�;::.-ei' �.�..�y.xnb � _. , 14i,y h \ Y � ApgJ.iciqixt°S st�tiv�+ ,C.'t,oval„pv.6iior Stilw4e aqenoy, rprlvate .:;.�,.�...,,....W.,,..-w......,±� .,��W:,�..w.,,.,,�yv...r.�... oaf' ' lu > Baa y4 �y 4 J p y', M 1.IiW i.f' G�tlrii ii1::,1RiYie.�F�W�S."u5wkgs�`:5 �1 q.{�1!FIs.IV B`�li+ u�r N4�I� pr4.64ry'i.:..�' mare C��C E of :�Coha � �� « � ` .. -'- � _ o &;N of exn d Ave 5 zones off. Chico, ssP Rd� �fG�i�wu . �.� �..:.�.._..... physio al '40 � t, eUOAr k we 'f a,> pyo ec � ��� � �� � t�'0'e : �Y i� 'a� zti a .t ? a �: w ie , ; i c '� Cbhb �� 1 ba 'atii " z i lilateel 3"chodu:i uic soor gas oSal ") ' �`�, . �.�a�����e; �����,��s���,� �>�,ri�r�,�.��� ��'�t` i1°��.#�.ti�t���: ��c��d���;x� �ar►��� �� 't;ka�:, oANw4./ .rGi. to W. to bb Womp a1 aio Vw�e' �1 A'+ F' qi rhw l7 MHA �.i{,d.+4�rL?nW7 r, C ! w ....i..r+wu+ u.-wwu..wr.iw�w..•Y!+kywruw�,��eu+l.•�:r.tn�..wW..sw.ur+'.,tiud�.�sccsy;u+.' � ����...w°aa.w., . y.�.�}�x J •nI7 r 1�u e Cb ► � anri � d6ftiftt3 ss ora ' FINDINGS BIAto 3 Co. Planj2nq Comm. Rezone_ Q Applicant's Name Type of 1,)roject J -7 Cen•tor D., NE Chico Address Location or i?nrcel No, - Axa rine. CA 95965 1/2Z74 Date Received ; YES Y NO t ". boes the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or curtail the range of"the environment (narrow the range of beneficial uses of the env;ironmentq ) 'a 2. , gill the project cause impacts which achieve short-term, ,_ p � p t-term, to the u disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? A &bort term ., ' impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively briefs definitive long-term impaots will endure well into the future* while ' 3. Could the project, cause impacts which are individually Iimitedy but cumulatively ..sib�i`siderable7 A project may impact on two or more separate reSu�urces where the 'impact on oath resource is relatively small. If the effect of the total; of those impacts` on the environment is significant} An MR must be 'prepared. i _ This finding does not apply to two or more separate project;, where the impact of each is insiglt'%ficant _ 3 4i Could the environmental effects of the project cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings; either directly or indirectly? ' NOTE; If any of the ah 1,Vt`; fobr findings questions are answered 86j the project will be found to have a 8ignifi.cant effect � ah 'the environment DftPl2Mw'Y'Xt)N This project will not have a d," n icantJ,elfect ori Lhe e0:Fironm0t6 it ;r A Nega'tivj Declaration should he prepare . T1Iis, ro act could have a tihz en'vironmecr'. r� AliEIR is r6"quited, it .If ,•��'�. -'� t.W ,""'-'1 1 ' .PWI RONMENTAL REi 122 COMMITTE JANi 1914 �`ba�e •� - l.1llYPF"�Cd J. 6��rgoir r �� , t�NI��'i Nig CHICO,! I Coy P� E �:�- coi�l< i�tl�.�r; v ( APFE14l)IX C� DETERMINAI,ION RE SxGNIVICANT E FFE CT ;!OR I-NVIRONMCNT ii Butte Cc'-,. P1.anning° Comm. i� Co. Center DX. , Croya>l le, CA 9!5965 Applicant's Name and Addx'e�sji' I� , Re NE hico 1/?;/74 Rezone C +� I i`.ype iof project Location or Parcel No l; Data Received 1 An env vonmen)lal impact report is'required for anylproject which, may have'a sign nifi�cont effeLL (substantial, adverse impact) on thea ent►irohment. 9ffeetsl include environmental consequences of both primary and seci�ndary nature. iI Thlte fbllowing questions shall be used as guideli'ne,s to dezide whether t&,/make a nAgative declaration of an environmental impact report. Ulf answer is unknown, �( " n yes/no column.) write unknown ,. � ti CHECKLIST Y98 NO -' 1.y' C►�u1�., ,+,y'`proje6h significantly change present: uses of the project area? (See Notes.) 2. p oje6t slignificanb?(y conflict with the Butte County D oe, ther General flan or any element fthereof7-r 3. Could the prpject aff'.OE the, use of a recreational. area? . �f oxld th.. . ro �t hc. a stili a p- ?' .. ;. �rstantial and ckr:�onstrable neg 4 ,t� y atiVe :efpect, on an area or f:sat ure of, aesthetic 'value?01 � y',nattxral'''or that, �+nad�. ,.�,.. 5. Will an _ - w �` � fent+gyres in the project area foun� ,i.r.;' oiAhel^ which are unlgUd that ixs t at parts of the "° Count', State or Nation)�bl'tAffoctec will ti,e project 'i.nvolve construct, an of facilities an a, slope nt 2a percent, of gretIter? _ 1, Still the project "involute significant cuts or fills? 6. Could the xo ect cause subs - p' j � "t(}ntial fho Xing, erosion; or a l i I� t4 94 'will the project involve donstr�, oh of faciati�es in,, an 94 of ` ' eologic, hatars? ,,area 10: Could the project char L' existing fe"'.6idt y3t involve con,- Strgdtibrl ih special building pernit� along the Sadtay (areas cover 'Floodw&�°, ih''tab.V area subs ect., l i area in lase prokimit� , do an river l ehtdutidatiohthe Vdabadr ^� 7 U streat>is latae, reservoir o,� hattlral. drainage channel? i.es of duimulati 6 actioin which 11. As the project one aii' a ye` , although ihdividudlly tMall, itay. �:as a whale have sign'facant: 12. Could 'the project lyre, nati I ' tech an published `` � � y onal,C)tate; or � __.... :, ocal stdndard, relating tb solid taacte or littei cohtrb),;'7 - ,. MIMFIMM WWI as. 13. b6t6s 'the project � or the proje��t site Geri ,hahttat, taod source, nesting place, source of water, etc. f -Sr rar4 ` or �n dangerec( rilailike o f }"h species? 14• 1t� Gould the project' ai.gnificantly affect fish, wildlife, or J)latlt life or cause;suastantiial interference with the move.' Ment of any resident or nil ,,"I 'y fish o,r.wildlife speciate Are�-�there any rand gered plant ispecios in the pre: '�- ect area? wiL the project 1embve su;bsttifitial .amounts of veg etation including ground c8V'er? , 11. , C�buid the project• change existing features of any of the . (� /:re06n's watercourses or other bodies of crater? 1P; Could the project result in significant{change in the hydrology of the area? (See Notes.) P 19. Could the project significantiy,nffect the functioning of an established community'? (See Notes.) 20,. Could the project phytical'l:y or economically result in the displdcement of .community residents? _. 21. Could the project significantly affect an historical or archaelogi:c 1 site or its setting? (See Cotes.) 22. Could the project serve to encourage development of pres't:rifly undeveloped areas or tntonsify development~ of already devel� aped ateas7 (See Notes:) w 23. � Are you aware of a substantial body of opinion (present or ` anticipated) that considers (or will consider) the project ar its effect to be adverse -to the environment? 24, Will the project create new or aggravate existing healtr -- _ 25. _hazards? ,r Will the, project Involve the application, till e. or dispctal of poti~ntiall hazardous 'materials in an ain�ociriir stiff Y ' 'i,cient to •cause a substantial adverse effect? 26:. Could the ptoject generate significant amouhts of dust, smoke, ;gas, odors, or other air pollutants lo 27, Could the projectgenerate :significant )noise? ra 281 Could the project cause contsmidatiun of a public water tupply, t, system or advorse y affect ground watear7 2'4. Could the ptojdct significantly affect the potential u se, eXtractioh or con5ervati.oh of a natural resoUrce 30: Could the project restilt in ;damage to soil capability or loss Of agt'icul.t:utal. lghd? 3VI Additional 'reinarks: l This i.s an Rnvironmental lx 1pact Report ..�, for "rezoning in norther �t Chico, 15141 De, cJ'ij?tion of Project. (a) S ys,_ is a�pproxintaly, . 't GO acres 'lacy ped south of a ca��lore geek, east of Cohasset. Roach, ywest o\f T�ildwlod Avenue, in the Chza:o Urban Aroa P Thel proj,ctI:t is- known as the Norlrheast Chc o irezoning, „ E� ,. 11 of 0bIcCtiva- a;t7tt�►l�t'` V t)1c Proposed _.�• }7toj.nct.l from (General) ; the `:least: restrictive zoning ; classifica�_i-cin in the,2 County, to "S-- " (Suburban- Residenti.al) The proposed new zoning alassifi- : cation would reduce the r.'nge of uses >al,lotved in t:he area and' provide a , zoning ordinance consistent with' tho agricultsural-res den-Uai �,ioture Of the area. f. i ` (c) jy GcneraI Description of the ? r,2 oct's Technlcaa r r Economic. and Environmental C} azr -taristi_cs Con=y. ss dcri n2 the P.rincxpl e ralgir`loexi»g R?-- al.s . :Tile rezoning.,proposa.l would not'involve physical development of the area at this time, but would - �,� provide �ohe��`��zo�1 ha.neotildrrcd'uceethevlopment � 9, g tango of economic f ,ctors �whieh� could effect: the area in the futLxYca.l: The p.resont 'zoning allc�tas a wider) rangy of W es irial,uding industrial--oommercial: uses. Taos�e uses. Would provid% -a more varied base than.,that which would bt'I'cre�itod with the resx3ent;!i4l ancgr'ibuItural uses allot-,,ed in the pkoposed "S-l" zone: ThotwAtonmentral.charac- t et t+ 11 sties of the area are ' flat , uridevel.oped, areas caritigu�us to predomnan'tly sl ngleyfatnil.y resiw r: dential ;neighbc�rhaodc'i Thio area is pre'dom nsntlY ,' att area` of limited agticiAture potential and use ane _ vxtlt severe soil l itna.tat en's xelat:ed` to sL p-- i.;ic tangy:,. percolation: and dra na.gu. :L51,�l2, besorip'tiorl of, 8nvirontriental Setting. • The area 'toi the seut~h and West are developed with &grime c ;Ltt �^�l resi tint al trios. Tt erU ars: scattered coMmdir�- '` , • clal uses which are not~ to tho ` arca of rezonl�n.g. . The northWe �t,erl;yth' xd of the 0 .Y ,u zoning arca falls W, thin tho 1000 ;fit` flight- pattern kor the Chi�-•� airport.. � There an nth knnOW i' taro or unicla o envai�s'nattent ,� r��;�oiirc ;a in the aroa. The rogion hCts a hy�t-otV of surfdco Clooding .end t soil cane. �> bort have oharactoritticstlf =' Yipczfieability , , _ 15113, (a), Environmental. Impact: of 'the ' .,t.ct J�ction, "The rezoning Goes not. invol vo the ,iriitncd�.ate p}Yy si cal, dr_velojmell t of the arca;, howevz+i; r the chant}e 'in the':rango-of, land uses allowed in (he proposed t•, zonWinct and compared to the 'existiliq "A_211 (Gengral.) onang suggests,,that the future dovol6pment of the area %All be one of subdivision doo,;,.ty, resi- p p' \, dential develo nrnts The excc tion to the den- sitypuld be a,tl instances where tlho use of seleC_' r, Live .,parcels for agra„culrural use would exist. 4. The area would also dolltabl. several non --Conforming uses such a multip lC,, faml,ly dwellings, s g fraternal_ o:xgnin'I"aLicins and 'se,,vezal, rrc� ca;:iorjal facilitJ es. lice the area., is largely undq�l ! the impact of the usuggcsted zoninr� c,omp'ared to the existing zoning would most:. probably have''t~he effect of ° lessening the. intensity of the use of the land t under full devc p to meet. In the short-term, ; since, the arra. under the present zoxiing is being developed predominantly with tosidcntial uses the i immediate change in development patl:ern if the r proposed zoning is adopted Would(snot'boevic`,ent. The most; evident immediate change would 1J"e ,i`ri the � ,curtailment of the non-{residenti.al, non-arricul:ttuj�Al uses which arc- in the ce_. .`, � , + SInco .,tho . onsn tow allowed tlheexa �i~� ng cone could stric y 'be, igreater 'beca` 15e of the mi,ili.i l �he�,re tic�ll. �. dwelling uses allowodj the proposed zoning should ultimately, Under full develat:merit condi�:ions, reduce the populatrio'n distr 1 beta oh ani, conc'erit'r'a^ tibil in the area. (b) Any Adverse' Mivironmeni.al. ffects Which. Cannot Be Voided .: he Proposal s Sin - - lam nted which would ezonir';g has a potential maXimumr'deiisity The proposed ;ccec7 the`' allowable tol�jrZnces for tznsewercd develop ietit of the area~ The „existing tOhinq� however, has , potential for even higher ' erisi 3.es and intensity of lana, whiah� udder. dull developmeritf would Inb8t probably exceed t.hP t~oleranCes for ursetvered (5evr:.topment. Therefore , the proposed 20riinq, under Condl.tioris of full , devel.pp- merit would probably have a less severe effect than. ,, the ZOhing: There is Stl` l the potential,, howeverk of diva ronmental 'damage, . e. surface flooding,' `poot t)ercolation�t contami �.atibn of suzface ai cl, sub-surf-aca watery -,and failure of septa.e systeiite ` axi the area under,- „conditions of inahi.rililril r,�l. ricnt'' , bpi . I Sinc` c tyle most: adverse envi on' mental of fect,v,on the area could be develoj; meni±,,,of t:ho dyer to ' ma> imum density allowed in tiez011e, ti the Irtost, appropriate miti,cjating, 1T1Ga;3ure rlou].d be to provider,\sanitary sewers and drainacJa fac:il'l tlos for the: area . ( ) %lterna ives �to the Propo6ed Act i 0 ft 4 r '.Chere ar.e two axternat].vr„s to, flee propo5qd ace: on, one,of which relates to 'mitiC ''�tiatg the potential .adverse .rthe troPosea re7onzlg by allowing thc same restricted rang e of , ,uses as propo_;ed. in tubo "OS --1 u,l�.ut. 4�;h .cb'requires a larger lo't sizc> t thereby reducing the density and the t�ote�ntial for failure of sopt c systems and reducing surface drainage problems. ,The other alternative would be to ` retain the present ;> r zoniylg w1iich would have the effeCt df 'allo�Jir1 J greater land- use intensity than `,that: Hallowed in the proposed zoning. ' H u Thh Relationship ,Betwec,n too -al Short-'t?e m Uses_ o .� Man,nvirotyrtir,nt Ind the t•iaintenarjco and Enhances Ment of Loizg-,Term Productiyvit}y i The area being. considered for rezon3.n5 would -)retain r� agr cultux al use as a ; permitted use in the proms pbso p The area dads not have a history of cugone. production . other than seasonal graz,inq 01 ocoasional ahima?s kept as ananciillary use to residential development. Tho soil types for ti >e area are not generally acceptable'f-o, a ricul-j uand tblisled methods of a , i ctil- , tura] practice wouldProbably not_ maker the major', � ity of the arra productive as agra.cul,tural land Any LrrgV6rsible tnyitonmental Chances Which Wouid Y Be imyolye d xin the Proposed Aoti,on Sho,_Id It �e m ]cnten�t.ed. � `xhoro arc no non-rcncwable r'esourccs which arc, in l' 'jeopardy °should the chance ok zone take place Since the area, is shown ,,-=in the City of Chino and the bUttc County Cene?ral plans as landt which W33. ul.t imat fly be urbani2ed with residential uses by ;he yeas: 2000; the area has not been shown in the Open: ;pace or con ervatlon i;lembhts ok. the County j . Genoral Plan as an area being proposed for Perna - hent opCn4,spacer it is ahbic�patcd that, neighbor-' hood parks could be establ ibhed .i n the area should ' subst.nnti al residential dovel.opmont takb pl,"10e in r7 Old 'future, POWeVer, the proximity of ;!'the area t6 "ry ' the -)31+ Well. mark chain makes thonead for adds` t Tonal: yy� ch open --space and rec..,eatioi7al 1rces ctu„;ttion:Zble 11 Thq area"is Largely d'e%>oid of vogatttLlon ;other ; than nat-EII76? grasses and developnien,t, of the area, wotild not r,clnovo substantial: vege'tativo cover other than those grasses, nor cndan9ca, rano and endangered plants or animal spocies. (g) The Grow th-Inducing,,xmgact of .the LOosadnth x. Fy y - 'x:11 � �.rh�e Cat and. Cou�at; Genes -al Plans re 1tmelid this area for res�iclent.ial uses. The growth, trends in � the, Chico a.r a. ,ar t� toward ths.s area oa the nori h-- ' ea8t tl area t Chico and to the 8outhe!1, tr away I �c� �� �, � � � { t>,�.,�,� .Lana .t<o t,11e nc1�.i,hwest, �•�cst t. .r and,•:southwe which by plicy .decl,arsjtio,n of the t r 13ut;tc=,ICbunt:.,� I3c��at�d' ni Su`5erva.sorS and. City of Chid official:,, ,are proposed for retention of agr "bult-Ure. The policy of ancouraginq growth to go ge >pral:ly t=o the exist away from agrIcultural 1nd has accelerated the growth potent.a,l c�this area% The rezoning Of 'the area from the .,,1A-7 " to a residential; use should not accelerate the growth r. pattern above that now ek5tabl.ished by City and County policies. A majo,�ot�stacle in ���he° growthyr 4 of this area at: the density allowed in the pro- posed zoning Would be the lac} of 'sanitary sewer and drainage fadil,ities., irhe •rezoning of ,the area(,,.,) to a specific residential zoning diat'rict from the I general "A•-2” disttict~ which allows, uses that are !' got comp-atible withr`esid0htial develo intent may encourage the development of the area into residence. tion use,"'theroby creating a clemand for sewer and drainage facilities . if facilities are Oztabl.ished'�- l ._ 1 hen' the !3itYdenie's allowed in the 115111 zone could . �` ..d he realiseand 4 --he area would be stlbjeot to theh \` c'2CCG'lernted grOWth+ 4,.. 15144: Organizations and Pge'Obns Consulted, has nv ronmental impact Oe bkt was prepakdd by the Dutte County Planning Stags xh cooperat- d County on With the Of Chico Planning 8taf',f and other interest�a City' ,. ageneses , , (13 t?r Jay 1. EL r ECTS ON t3IDWELL PARK r .r , a. ) Increased use of park.' „ b Increased" r.evenue -to Chico Area Rec:ceatloh District from,, , broader tax base., II 1 2. V] IOObING" �1. o receive' revenue "xom area a. Storm drainage district would �; _ benef'i�t•edi �3. MOSQUITO C6NITROh a. Intense'.`!, residential wager 'use ,in this :ea would' not l n- crease Or decrease the vector pioble�ns. 4 , "TRAFFIC f �` �� c;'�(b f _w .",Ot' urne Will lncrea�e w a"-��z tle`v�e1optneftt, I� �raff�.o+� , 11 „ .. .a , .., f�. etc: are t; n ed� .��o ,-.. L. Rodd ma�.n.t�nane��.� sa. na s y r 9 � wa. ex, ng, _ i� d � m 1 � ,j�, ' 1 , no �t gen.ex+a and bac revetueSt. t;tiunt all 111crisli and a; 5 . i) CITY CO'UNT'Y 1�2wICrS r 1 "Se with CiG' 'yCT,�JJ111�?31 T7emand -or sera desi:l] nc.rc+ i �? „ o d� _ „ ,b. beve�.opmen� broadens the t~a�c base .pori whicri t-6-dist'i- bi.1 to these sotvaIce costs. �� 1 .�'r6 Lbw VEU.8L CORRIDOR: Portion, of'Ehe area is within ,the A l vorrr,��a o� , " ,, � d in<�,the C.�Si�p.�eliens�tre n e d �a.nd cotild be ihdll egt�red byi tht;`ib�'ie A Comirt'�:ss�:rih,: Lai1a, Use_ illan r , It ti1 IV X n j la U' III ,I , 7 . ' TAXII-115 U of a. See` a a ra h? g p s 1, 2, 41 and 5. b., .; Single family res ,dentia] ,developments are idot self- supporting, buc "are deendent upon multi �` rnily and comms mero l d.evelo mems elsewhere �j '" , p '�� to sustaa.rj publicly financed � '> seruices, i.e. schools, county general fund. 8.. ALTLRNATZVtS - , a. Within � California Water Quality Control: Board •Guidelines ` �) one acre is not sufficient dor subdivys3on development: b. Installation f sewer;, " for one of acre parCell�, '"s s not eeonomw ically feasible. 9 : GIRO'ITHI It UbOCZNG IMPACT a , Adequate � . ,r 1 covered in braft Entra.ronr,,t�ntal. impact Report, 'I • see paragraph ►�Gi� 1, I 1 I` 1" t 111 1 1 , , {I fir✓ � I 1, janolfl y 24, 1974 ' ion;tothei3utte County Planning; Conmiss.• .. :.. (� 1 it is my understdndi g that the Commission is bvfitr asked to approve S-1 zoning for a property in north-east Chl(.6 of about 520 Acres. s. I also understand that $-1 zoning ermita E�.ve penied for residences per acre. This zoning should �e d r a �tsons.�,. of air pollution eojIssions. ::. p Air Pollution O-missionag the c� Prom the Dint -of -view of, property should instead be pored 5-2 or some other lowar-,ien6ity category of about -1 residenra per acre. S-1 zoning tdll without doubt lead to five tir'yaa largdr total t:4 air pollutaaO- ` ,emiss�-ons than � he cited loi4er4-density 4oninr. If .,� 000 we use A base of 40 f� , eo lE! in the Chico mUniciPAl hrea; the new residents in ,the pr�posed tolling area vrW increase the appropriate air pollution inventory figures by about 25% The l6i4dr-density 4 Nt� ,_ zoning; referred to Above, %�on;l.d its contrast, lead to only about a F 5%<,:1ncrea9e in air pollutant eitis`sions i You should also understind clearly that the increased atr ff .� pollutant concentrations;, %ohich,, these increased eini,s5"icyns wi I cal 'se, Vi II be breathed riot by red:ldeints of the proposed zoning; axed, but a instede; by residents 00 live in the center of the Chico munitipal' areas/ that is 0 by people ,"presently resident in the County of Butte. 4 'these are si xicar►tq obJectivew and technical' tOns6fib t4hich hte. Jn my opinioni sU£k cient to deny the 06060ed zoning: This conclUs:Lon is reinforced by ta,e amount of vacant Acreape in the �t Ch'ico munic�pa ataij, located east of tic city, nireAdy provided tsich public ser Aces y and better si4ited to 'Id-gh density deve�.opmt! t. :. 1 Pi�a'ensloriii�. rteteiixt��.opiat , A at ►t6-,,nt,,ta the rutte aunty PLInnih�; Co'mmiasion regarding "Draft rnviromcsntal � xmpAct ttnpo'rt for the Northeast Cllkco t2Qxone (October 197)lt ,y: Philip A. Lyrion, 290 San Verbenih Way, Chico - The envi romiont.al impact report (`- A) cont+xins critical at'iciencior tj in the scctiona ' 40n env-' •`rtiv-ital impact rind adverse effects) ,alternatives to the nroposodaction, and growth-�inllt-- g >imrNic't. each of L4 cao ig diacussed in turn, �' t it$ rt. .;Ncci oris on mviromcntal impact and Adverse envir6r nental effects ` The principal failings of these sections lie in discussions„that do not appear ' ^7d in rv'di-tt'W rms th zt. are not Made Uonp, imo,%ats aro 9frects not considered are tate ;`oli.•�„�i►� �1 Bid ll Ar4,t, ,'hat .ire the likely ef,`octs on they\I, ark of hirrh-cep hsity 0-1 use ,3 IP I '►nd zmmeditate) arj iacrtit to part of l the, Parr bnrdrrs in U Aper Park? What are the ;t x C� oke y nrvrects on ,the Park of id`s l'se by`(ali additi,bhal: 10)000 to 15,000 people 'in the tozhne area who ,gould have the; 'ark as their sole opeh-spAco %` recreatiohal outlet, as is suerested?in the 81`A se-Aioft',on:arreverlsib),e irnpa t,81 ti Ll .fi+ To what extant will 9l1 urbanization of the rezone area i.holease Q floodi`ingl Will public talc htohe's be reoAred to alloviato the problem! t4as�uitin`trl. To what extpht wi1).'rpsidehtiix pater usb in the detlsely- ,i Pop .aterl rezone,;a"a encourage m6eq ito 'breeding! 1 Tt"a('rioi To what extent will "i.so and traffic flbW bb illcireased in ar eas ` nrlrb,*t h;tt n'ot in the rezone Areafi 1-311 public Mt.+Mies be r•egtiired i`or street t+ rieriri - a maint,,rtahcP, sigttalsy ntc, j as a reslalt of t he $,000 to 10,000'add1tiohal auteciobiles that will he "in the area it it t1i s retorted to 8-11 �... Cat and 2211-1tZ se, iccn, What hire the likely Ottects;off' Si;]: use or” f the rczotie. IntCr111s hf �incrcr'�sed derrjafld fAY titld OC)dt o f public services such as l�,re And t,lice Pitteeti Qn sc?iot�, d atrodtr3 ,, p ► ► ga�c�rs, and a host of other tax supported i Y w Ylo -'level corridor. 4Jhrat are Uro rN1 regulation ..-- -je—V lntions re��ardi,ry8 elevation of aircraft a . roschin nor leavIng the Chic� airport? What, do Fedaral st atist;ics reveal a$ to the "I.ikl ihood of a crash during landing, or takeoff at an. ai sport of thial, size? TO ' what nri .sa levels d 1l residences in or near the' dort4dor be -a.i4 jected7 s 'me -11i, will the increased tax revenue resulting from an 3-1 , levhl,of intenao development be 'less than the increased ttex costs of publi6ly-financod services? Numerous 40tudi ea elsei-here shot that nmf costa tend to be, greater, than revanues i there anyth inf; *Out this 8-1 proposal that suggest9 a different outccmo? II. section on altenrnatives to the proposed action► , The only consideration Evan to S-21 toning in the, entire report appears in batt of a sentmte in this sectlohp in which it is observed that S-2 would allox "the � sates restrictedrestrictedrange of uses►, as 8�-; but would require ", alarg ar lot size, thereby r"o- ducih the drnsit ° K y and the potential' far failure of. septic syotems "and reducing', aur 'ace drainage. problomsii, Nowhere .does there appeari appear,as Y believe is required by law, nyt,i that ;,could , 1 . . lunoh nK que3tiohs 'that shou7:d syph loosel be called a discussion of th'iy al.toi�nati,vo 6iwered are: Why is 5-2 with its, prospects of reduced densityland ra'll ducnd potential for , septic c sand drsi na e p prob,lens defted loss desireable than S-1? What Are the- enV1rarir mental. Of1'cct8 of S-2 especially cotnpardd-..try S�-l? Effect by ,offecf f hhich clagsifi fr ' citioh tltimately will prove mora cos'f;�lY '�o tiie 'taxpayer, and which ultimately will ptvvide the, O—eA"'r eritrironrnental disruption?' _ j ossi In addition to the p bi lity of a rezone to 54` t", ' other aInati"va� to Sa e est but Were riot discussed or ever, mehti.onddi 'or eXampl er the .' utherh, already» developed part o` the reiona area could be toned S-Ij while the undeveloped northern 1 part OU'A' d be zoned 8-2, wj & Aa3 tohi.ng adAcont to 8idWO311 Parc aril ih the low-level flAght corridor to Chico Airporb r ' r; o) 1,11. S ectior► an �rowLh�itiducinc; i,npact Noihore, in this section nor anywhoro else, in the EiR is mention made of m major dev;loper's; wldol,y-known rut totally unpublicized plans, r' portedly prepared in some, detail., to drvcl,op much of the rezbne area very intensively. As this pAbn has been explained to me, a sewer and drainage,distAct will be foniled that; aided by City arinex4tib'n, will, require taxpayers and: homeown6Y9 contiguous to, the rezone area to , 43 pay a substm tial part of the cost of providing sewers and drainage to the devt lopael a land; the Chico 0,3,ty sewer system is ultimately ;`supposed to handle` the additional , serape: A Certainly a minimally -adequate E111 would rote and fully describe this very 3tib"tr Arowth inducement that 5-1 rezoning'"'.wou'':A have in list of such a plane' if 41,e pD1 is correctlydescribed he`rQ. Further, other sections of the 1 iR sioul.d descfribv the 6;i .,ects on the,'City sower plant and collection syst'emj and the predictable O'Pfaicta of intraased taxation on hOM, eoy4ers adjacent to the rez6h6 area. Conclusion TY .e 'October 1973 EiRl forms an inadequate basis on 'which to make a'decision %ec�3use i.. does not even mention most of the r dicteble environmental impacts end p adverse effects,, because bnpacts .a�jd effects of reabl.e altornati.ves to the proposal are not considerede and because the growth -inducing impact of the proposal does not take into account ex',' titg private plana for development that will have , l6ng-lhsb1n8 public effectt'-U :t Will9roach faf- beyond the boundaries of the rezona )N res r , r I U ; r, STATVENT TO DUTT'C COUNTY -PLANNING C01VX-33SIOn Philip A. Lydon ° 2948 San ,Verbeha Way hico, Cal: I am appearing, hef ore vein to protest the holding. ofQA rezone hftaring.,,ibr which,., an ade�?tintb FTTt hfi; not been prPp'ared The County Planning , OP,fice maintains ' � khat an GTR N'repared for the, never-implementei3 r; 1"1,10 Chico Rezone'! of last Novcfaber providea,a 'sufficient base for considering then rezone ipplination before us now: Such a position-- and, if followed by this Comrission, such a procedure, ---Violates provisions of the Calif. Achinistrative Code' ,and` of Butte County's adopted "Procedures for implementationofEQAi� (sections 5' S and ;5 T) f.) The reasons are as Pollowe r i. No final. '= from the previous - (November) hearth exirtsj P.ral comments prsented'at thatkneetin�� regarding groundwater ade uac oand aircraft noisee among others) were not appended to 'th°� draft F1Rs `pd Were not responded to y P ge y, in detail. ,b- the res nns'•ble a enc as must be, done before a final EIR can , e3i S t i !1 Fa tensive critical: comments and questions submitted in %trritin b self were y mar 01mil.arly ighoted6 You tnay recal.i that 1 gaestioned the failure of that t1R to obnsl.d� lh detail. • the c 2 zoning, its f • =• oats and 'oeriefits`' of S �, allure to consider im acts of S -l. and 5-2 tonin on ObUnt ` and City se Ia r f p � r Y '� rvices, and its failure to consider taxation effects on homeo�ad, scent to, bA not, in, the rezone area, i.jy copy- of my earl i.ar remarks-- st3� l �gLe�rant to orifi ht! t!A - is s�ibmi'steci , y 2. The pretr.ously prepared kk .cennot sor've }a 'bapis fo;* conbi.do.rati.oy t Gf the ; rd Sims or, Fish rozoite, proposal.; GVM Guidelines 619te that 'planned p1riVate projects must be lhc' ud�d ih i;1.ds. Sbidd an exs,tonsi,ve re port has been in Planning Office files fob ; obvert; tnontl s, re;"erdloe to it must b�6 iftdl udbd i h the M , y A is Y 0 r+ 'A Lydo)i P2 ZI ;.• Thore 'is in the re9ant.fExFl no reference to" co z'ecai,'ved frcmm otentially -`' p p (( concerned agenciat, ,such as, -Central 'Ailey Regional, Water Quality Control Board, . CAlifAir..'Resources Board ' ,; .Chico PuL? 1c Works bepartmenti FAA, and FNA. , By fail to even mention the so --called, Fish report, the EIR in essence deprives cikizens of the opportunity to comment on such ` ch aspectsof the plan .t as odors from multiple seWage ponds just north of a long-otanding1redidential area, ;pitizens and th s'Commission should 'be"aware that th`s Fish report a ears, to call for taxation of xd jacent hom-sowners: ii ::. i.t is inperat`ive ta ' Pp that, automauic motivation for eventual. Annexation r� Y , , .. f`to the City of Chico.:, �be rovide&.'' . the overall tax rate to for sew' ers) shop . than the p � � � d be more differential tax rate of the City of Chie011', Assesem.ents of 0100/acre and projected tat, rales in, oxreS5 of,'51.6Q 10J orf discussed- otrding 01 tie , i report is unclear, but apparently some of ;tI e8e taxes ,are to be imposed , on hvei loners adjacent to Cher Fish property. , In eohclusioni Z ,would like"to, call youp attention to an artield in the Say I'' co Chronicle, dated, Nov. '11r' 19"t3a reporting �; shit by the State of Ot � 1`t�rh3 a rancis t _ ., 1 \ �t�' ouhty,)offici.al.s against, Kern Courity'.> Th cotitent�.on of the State was that. Kern C . had neglected to analyze critically, and � -respond tq� public criticism of ori 81A prepared by the `County. Attorney General. Younger, i$ quoted as having saidt p g �.`(";'lie rart,ice of i' norm Comments received from. tk►e p;ib,lic ar.d other g g hies defeats the enure :p�pose of the California' overnmente.l a e Khvironmentdl Qua It Act and makes the no Brat u � y �' p >� ion and c3vculatt1en bf 9til' repnrt a ine ►,, j 8n,��'''',y99 eX/erci90 . ll .y o. J1) r; X, jj _ Y ``j rr11 Cw U �, .....IPA Lydon attachment ,'j , 1 fJ L1 8m OF REQUIRED fftOCEOURES NOT FOLT O;,IED ,,q Tfi RES � ;' / , P,LCT Z`U'Tfti OCTOBER; q !•., R E (Numbers, at and oi' each remark' refer to Title 141 Cal. Admjl,'t Godes availklle_ In Butte County Library.) 1. After" cA 1)r''z,ing a draft EIR. , the responsible agoncy must, , . obtain the 5commpnts of any publi.v agency which has jurisdiction by law with respect to theme project., (15045 2. TY e res bn, bl,e age shat. p (�i }� 1: eval.u�t,e ..comments `het; ;�.v��d frorii persons who .; reviewed .rite draft FUR. 15085.(d). (,5�5 (e) 3: The responsible aehcy shall prepare a f3 nal. EIF, v ' ca enc1505 ` . p - • p ibl.e 4. ,'Elie fiY',a1 1JrR shall °so ' re:ipntQd to the decision-mak;in body of the r .s ons g„ Y 1505(f) p project � ��,eherai,description of the 5. The descri tion of .,t}te ro Pct sha �. contain... a • prd ject i s... economic characteristics 1.5141 (c,c: J f 6, Specific `rePorpnce to reInted,, pro jeo+1.s both public and private)both existant and planned :., should also i„�.Jnclud,ed. 15142 7+ Che ESR) :. ; should 1hcl,u.de specir." �s of, b . change's 3nducecT in population distribution) copulation canaehtratzon:.�. and ct:hor apgcto of the resource base such as... public service,`. 15143 (a) 3: Describe any known altorhktivos, to the p;°ojert... Attenti,,.n\shaullie paid tb hhermtives capablo of reducing of elifiinet.ing, any enrrironmentally adverse i.mputs� even if these al,terriati'ves,.siibstahtitally impede the at°rta n- Mont of 'ahs- project objective's and are most cat;l.y, 1514 ' (c) �c, e g p° p g iin o he:�ltlt. or safety ltior5 B�l0t1Wl a be iveh:. to iri acts ::. ��se 'on � .Orisks t g+ p �� ec�a ` Pr a �° 1.514�c<�� ') 1.0; .,'. ►.,poeabans why the proposed p" jeat i.5 believed by the sHohsor to be jtvgUf� ed: • wethan rg 4n option for further( e`?, alternat3�ves� shu „ �bexp7:aitteda*5i4�(e)+ 11: Db4cuss the Ways'in which the proposed' project oauld" foster Ccohomi.c or population growth :: y, 3 nol,udi"rtg ... pro3e t,s i�thich wot lid mvmove ob�,badldb to populatiost vbwthi 15143 (°) r 120 lncreAops ii °�1"1e populatiutrtt 'W6.y fUethe�r tai com#.Ihity eervi.c`e facilities s,—� oonsideratiLj must bi: given to i his impact. ,°r� host hot be assuhi d that gi,bw+h'a r: s 111e606'sar3!l.y b6bofioial.j detrirnmeh at) orl of L tl.e sighiticancis to this girl- { 1 Vroiiment.°5�4 .(�)10, ��, a r;'A Lydon attdchment; p 2 19. The identity of all... agencies,.. organizations. and private individuals ccncul,ted in preparing an EIR, and the identity of the persons, firm or agency preparing the MR. ..must be. given. 1514:4 r-) lh The Fnal, EIR shall consist of the Draft EIF....a section describing the comms'jobeived..and the response of the Responsible Agohey to the significant At�4l points rained in the review and co,n-mltation process° 15,146 (a)' 15. The responss of th'e Rebponsible Agen'dy... shall descr .be the disposition, of—,' significant environmental _issues raised.,* In particular the major issues 'raised ...in the comments must be addressed in detail (when the Resporisible Agency I's +ositiow is at variance„ giving Veagons why specific comments and suggestions were not accepted, and factors of overriding ioiportance warrhnting an override r . ! of the 9uggestibns. 15146 b • q rr: A A i, 11 ( rr , `I * i. i 11 i C) 0 tJ y U A , x , n rl 04a ArARICQLD AYENG jtotm ,3. Box zmc Janui ry 24t 1974 C111CU.4AM1,-oRhl'lrt ZOO ;1 Ta: Butte,'Ooi).nty Planning Comtnssion � t�.> Prom. R. L. :,edenburg, 284$ Marigold Avenue, Chico, Ca, I reg'1 t that I am unable to attend tonight" s7)meeting ainc.e in the past I have enjoyed your disCu5` 7 O/ s x0]atiYe t0 ]and use e / and T fright have, 3 hformation rglativa V. tonight I s topio As the. Commissior Considers appropriate Ianc use for the northeast Chico v, "-area the present and'uture use oJ" the airport becomes an'important factor, " it is possible that the d90ision cf some years ago to havo the„city airport north o;f the city also docided that the i�esSdential developmont of Cliico, beyond that lei^ersent],y dompleted, should not be to the northeast since a%y 4j airport has an adverse effect on the,quality of vesidontial life nearby, ,Using noise con*sours suPilied by the` Air ort Commission itis eavy to,” ' d6aon6trate that even the pre�ient air t? fia ciliates a, problem. Before ar>iv long range, plaits for land use north of the city can be`,!ade,the expanded use of the airport ovdt the next!, ten to iv!ehty years should be studied and its impact, on, residential development considered, Map l: a„ p , i �ached, shows tha Peitsived poise Level (P dB) contour's for ^` ' aircraft 6f the W-9 type on takeoff,,;: Spot dhow lcs of noise levels during actual takoW6 indicate that these cor►touii va :uos are ,bomewhat I'& for the High}, patt'ern�s presently being flown: -- `his discrepancy is pxobably due to A loner rate o climb than that anticipated by the oontoura. this difference,. ' ns iot great at but it does make the actual noisy: levels tt thin time l.ghtly ' i `tY g hi her than /shown on the accbm pa. s . g n mau I 1" tILp 6 , . tion to the contours, the area that is boibg .studied ' r �hDws ixz addx sub rou of this by g p Comrn3.ssion" (oUtl ihod in green) acid the fe7i k'ezonin a ik g } az ea �beingcons�.dered fob re�,oh�.n� "tonight (oetl�,nad an red) ... ', ,. pl "'-:.--'"•.:/J ... ': r .."�(1, „ I:, -\,- Pd{ge 2� Butta do. ,Pl.anhil °Cot�im,�sJ on,. Jr�r.� ��4. 19�4 1 Ti`l oravting the contours it ti:�:'y' assumed that tho Plsnec ;'ill be following,, the centorlinb of, the I'?odI tt7o Cona As flights vary from this cent,;riine 1; the contours woul'44-also move but this difference Would not be sigaricant, r, unless vhe Path variations were as great as that observed for the :&erato bombers which f � � " ],y far to the, east of this centorl.ine and ui such low altitudes to thri east as the :foothiJ.is. �. that a hig�ic�r ,noise level would result as far f � �asidenl.s ndar.-other airports have indi:..-ated that Perceived Noise Levels in excess of 80 cause si"hificant annoyance. Map T indicates that both tho--- " s y lev�ti. (Perceived 1, t � sas have noire ab�ov� this Arno once Veen and re bounded', p , 1� Ncisv Le73�, is simil,a7' ;to \;be more common decibel love l cn &o A scall-, WA) that" used for most sound monito'ri'ng except that' ;igives a greater woight" is �.� to S-ounc *.. ,li the 4000 'hertz range. Thoso are high pitched sounds and are mortis ivrortant for tno.`Jtoring aircraft than .for other municipal no- �es.`i Map ;TT indicates dBA noise levels' that could 'be expeotod in eight diff't�rent ic bac and "and inside a closed "h dse locat ` k kY oris as a 17C-9 type Plane takes' Off. The highor reading is, of corse* for tho backyard, Nci.bol readjhgs on the \ A scala are used Ohl this irtaP sihce that is the scAle'Inora commonly encountered in,,ythe pr,§i's and in industry, it should be hated as" these levels are in8pbotod 1� tha'� it is 'very �i- fficult to carryP.tiOft a c00e1-sati cin if the "A I eve]. oxceeds. 6.5'Iatid'- that equipment is r000ttmended for indus�trial iucrkers if the 8' level''ekda its 80 ,. 1 ��a3td use 5tan1,, have been davol,oped by many communities that sets noise " da ds 4 d g 'Eihd 'schools lav©isl a, oae whic esi�lentai Nous h cannot be built. The 5"adera i#au;:i.nb Mmin3.A2rata oh has sot standards above which it still ,hot advance marta e h g �' � 'iartgy : butte County and Chico .►ul.d study expected fut tre aitport use arxiAevelop gUidolinn; for approved land us-ih the vicinity of the airport] �� g � � P� ,iso h��cal, os�tion t � � � g m►u3.ssion i;�s hot �co i,i,�o the hil , 1~ rc p hat a Pl,ann�n �o hocassari ros ons ° gnomic c.orisiderati,ons as, they+e l � Hing' � 1 �� p lbla for ec , oirL�neYtd xo 1 ,. , N , la .. L.�,....�.---•— fa ,►fc�+gas s _ i � ��� #«yea �'trf ftrrA[ errrp" �, ii �'TtiY'-)rf1$T'C 14i do 4 �. -�--_ it ,., ,.� •• �, I=; nor t from\t 3tT'S COUtv"xY PLANNING D'BPi� TP "CHTCO %AFD Vlcxivxxx NV Vamp a 78 ord . : � .: -� .,,�,•T i,.ew,.+i?!.,<'� ,.. m, „!har ...^.-. 1 PIA? I dicates probable PWB �a r DC9 as 3 t takes a f(predonburg) 14.7ca d o V w :ai aH 1 ,�.�.,• 1 � , F � its.. � �Ir ', ► '' .� � �` \alai c�i� nll�'..' .1�' iC • 1• ��i i j ` ;� , �.�I! `;o ° {� liA: t� �. i1 Y�SIM I�,t71 ei Y ui. .4w , _11 .itiil it 4 �• � ' _a J.n,✓ - it � c�M �. �Z � I�f, •',� i , ilii. .. • �� � 4 tx4r rSi` V�41' �,;,(,-' �.- '--:�•w "" + �;r,;rj^ ri •�~" �..,` iYY+t�•.•1 ,pl.fiu.�� .� 1'', ��' ,a y. �� v\\\' i\Y'� 1 �i �i � if r' ' � 1 � �: �� •^ �' 11, :'P'.. ! ' A.i�•�' ..`^ IVl4/k e+N'r .1 r ii+,! j r \ i r� i ��`� r+ �` 1 ► TOW • i l.,ti.�t.� j 5 i1�I N ,`� 61r ,. �� � 1+,\ ji .4' �• - . ,�itl. i• <ti ,• � ) �'+,iw�, «r • , !,; .....i ! � Y :.tet ' I; , t... a..J�/ l a ji•.+\}a ,...sa«.c:1 '• � :aY. � i' i t; i ., ill �' li a' f x =1 i �. � � i+�� •'" \` \ t i' i`11 /3 49 �l J '• \v` } I... V .1 ., ..t ,,r.,Yt I VK. "'„ 51`:_ •i i,, y� i i ",0 J ♦y(r\ �`.`y.+ � ...:.. ,.'ll,,aaa"+i+ 1 � 1 1 ✓. f✓ . 11 u Yi • la , � 1`.Il,� i il__ ' ,jJ /r/yr, a✓� �..•. a,.:. JJ' . -e, r+y; �' \1 /{ a t i•. ,i* a .. 1 ,., li�.. •-.) �; �_ 1 i' cl��l�it\\\ i.� r:.,... .•f`�+.. ` i% ~�' .!� 1 a:y •.. i4 ` i a.i/ t•* w w+` t+ t. ya�YY%:� (�// -\7 (%;., ,, �i ,VS it I : 1 � v ti.. i�i 1�•. r.�i•'w:�� � 1 �,•"'""' �"1.��+, �.� { QI\`,.,. it r.. t c. l{i/�, ��i' \i,• ry 'l;1 ;moi„�\;.y � / �'t a�iY\' '{ .• \. 4 1. - ! - '� 1 •�� `1l li �.sY, r#11 • ' {. j a ',1 jY alr�✓ •. t,„ • ,,},1.1 w. r•1 r :L Ni r�t ,I/, �N• ,Fy`}'1� • C4 hi\ 'i.. .• L,f >♦(a(. t •• ..,f• U... \t fY..?• •,4 1 4i+♦' ..+.. ":.. �: '*-"x.11 j It .; '\`''•i \ t�l�a 44�!% �•a 9tg � / , ,; I - . .. i1 �\, % i�`i).. l a {. �,� •�'�. q J 1. W h `<.+`• '�`-'-� ..K 1 ,, ��� "\' • . ' '1:1 Y. .w . i,ath Y f.l i�.'J ..�J� �;..,? \\ J � /,'zt Y,r"';.,. ,•.. �iK. �� ��x�� '- Vt �, . , 1.y G. �� b•• v�� � Y w ► r1. ,,. v'"n+.' 1• Jam. � ,`�': �i N' �+e P�•,y l.��Vi •'�-'alt ./.ii \\�?,'}'. ♦. � \ �a�h' 1� `!r-7' . ,,. •a'. + Jr-�.'” � r , �"•c�,l �,tt� ai'� a a�rF"r`� 1. � F b 1 �t ,. ,•r � ✓ l N \ p ' M+, '. s �� ti t „ 1� ♦t A A 5 A 1 i'.,. t F rti+�,� , ���r'� � i• Ii• cl I,i Ytil� ��aa,•,•,:. 'il v '�t`�,.+1� +`' �If'� '%� 'I �.�1� o• / �� �, w \1?.i 'i� i,%" \ : � , t,:• �� i'vt tl, :It_ Sri , i , 11 f C� w a l,i"\ 1 �, + • F'i• c ,;% 'fir. ,1{. .. ,,� 1 1 r,l r,. ! / 1 � 1 rv,-. '\, r' �itatiw •' \ F i. r ti y a.i,ig Y `'\t M` 1 �,5 h� ;r,.+.' + .,,,,,,max.., !'' , b c�Li �,� S,�a1q A 1,1 • ix1 i Ii Y . { ,�.'�a i r 1 w. ,..7+'"� ,..,...,ua.,•,,/ .�,r/ a �' �,.� .,•l���l`,t � Vii{ Y'\ �i % „ ',, h .i e} . r'tf rr�\`1\1 a/' t �,\ \t+ ��'s`I•'r Y��� � .��✓ a� 4�,,3:✓" ��� -x,,,,1.1 � .i" af�!l 4it t\l\;•�f: ^ll,�� .•, il+ is"J �G"�� \, i 1�{\i� 1'+i�t'7 'eeywi5 a'`�. J�� �i 1i N , i�tat� .art �\.'.r\ "yl,� ,. w �;t{ ,`� .;y , r ��•� 1``, '" ,y� .'� i'i ,, � �1 � y�,� � 3„'•'�� k I, 5 10 5 :, r.rrtrY. , , ^ ID AfCN,1ROtQtl J/AJ ' � �•,a.� Mfr 11 .. NORTTI-BAS'S CHICO atom BUT` 9 COUNTY PLANK 1 :• � � t NG DEPARTMENT �azp o'f 0=0 Atli VICINITY i �V! , r•.•1 . 111• r.M tia• +',. i1 ) . i i ri,� „ ,.i .�� 1..^•..��r•'w 4 rrr•...,•NI,•�-.w�•.••. 1 < •A,�h ,, 1 i W r W,,.�,�,ir' sy.«1. t!. go„. MAP 11 Y,. , 72 3z t a �Cnaoates, robtble dBA levels�. illy •a. y '�«. 1 b1 faid and ips�4 closed f� a 'house -is IC9 Makes off i 4 gh •...., " (L'redonburg „r �i.'/ �. ,... y. '.r,: ii J..•• i.. ,I r•r, i«'ir•,inrs...•r w.,l.�w � � 1 1 .+ + 11, ii.i. ti 11 i Y i, Y 7 • r is 00 1 i ri ib} �tr. ,..-, _ 1 pi�Y �..Sii. I _.., �{•j �� li � 'ii.+ i • 1 `i ',. ill 11 I i 1+ `., a y^ �,/' l i ,4� li�,.li„••`iyi i...� ,i ,,'G'i� ,, � j C Ir 1 � };•v_i i .•. { .q+ i • • i nIr M...••••.. ,. i4 ilia iy,•:,.+..+ 1 '^r CJ irdwarrmwr.�.�.n1w+ r•J ,. .. .,. •� j , `iu... •,. , � w i Yi 1 �ir i �L+ �;` � ..+^' �• K �• 1� ,......+r"'�'�..+'tii � ��Wwr� ++ i 'v i\d �t r .1 i- '� + +. ,t .I a fi. 1 :i / i .,isr+t H 1 i ..�..•..a 4 oil i'�i 1 i \ ` • 1 + f yt, ^.••,: ' �+..rr:.�Yyr... •: 1U1Y ` }n�L..,...r .._rS :..�.it�.� „f'4:. i 111 RYa/, i• L %� n, girl, i• T,\, v \ ..d •. N{+.+.1.MLS 11+'.{f .l�iii: •j� %f :. V- ,i-i�y .,y yl ii, 1 •.` r/ /� iii , .,. t• r1'il 1 7 � 1. � � Z'. �'iiY •• i ir• 1 \Ii • f rI ii �4,+{ t• /•i 1i Lii "1' 'r•:i, .flz{. .i+.1 �iailt.il' N. I t\' ✓ i •ice r i +r • ' Ii .0 a i j � y ♦ / irk, /.:� `• y n'` \ '` 1 '1 Ili..{,i,Ii i {�i 6 • ,.', 4i 1 �,/ y i �' i,• 1 11Ji•1+ii •,;;,y�•...� I:i�:i ii��f:14 fi.�'v N�I I,y�"''`f i r��r`✓i.",�s }r J ii.`'t /�f r� y `N ' i - i `-` i f ' � tNh ''. 1 M ♦ 1 i ,>rYi c1; .' •` � � � � \ ` � • r- �• r' C � L 01 � - y1 r "' i � i 3_.._ _� �� f(q, �r',.��{✓r,� 1•' T } � � { i� j�� i acv j •'1 f %vl � �i. �' i \���_,.,•' �.�/'\`,... �� �'�-'t i'.. .. 11! hNi i.Si 1 i= I,i i.4+ s`'�=../���i "'�.,r ly✓/iy ��:':\ ••}. 4� 1• ,1 Y�� , � _ � '1 �' i\ ~�i i j: iy T+ i ,..:. }r•IF�i..J _•�..`�t� ♦`,i'�%�,I r�� �� I.��r+•`'"�.+��~I� F�l{� % n •f y i°.1 r ih i.•ir..r';..•.,�.Y.,. � � J! � i�% �� �r �•. � .. t� f. �. r �... c—••r �...4+ ♦ �_ 1 \ � iii S:� �� :..� i ' •.:151 }} �� -. t ,... 1 �N i. � 1 r _';. +1 . '� nli •rt• �� : �� ii �a �. i iii,,+ � � t +�.. i � 1� � � �•i ,. f � iU � i + � , rY+•':+ V �. if • ' .,y,� ii y ,,,j,�%i t t l �+ r 1�'. + 1 � . 1 . �,,;cl ;r �i � t \ � 1 + r •,;i y i � J a� i � � i f�..+`-'.,.:;,1» y y r r„1: r • : � ' r >.,� �"�`+ �, -'� L � t w� v f fir^ `T `+ � �,� . f'i. i. Y. j ti �; v. 1 �. - i q y p 5i J *'hj%� S V •I i ✓'ly;✓'.-s%'i •• ��'\ice: •�+ .r � •'.� U i i +r� .ti,li• t' • .�+'�i•'. i V� �}.ti L •d >''• �\J\`�. iy i�.i. i ``` � , /'r, - w cA � •, • i,l+ .c�,i''�ii�~ j +` •.:�hi•t•i��\'� ��tix ��r+ ��,. yi,� ���ir� ,11 iJ . iil'�. r� rt "" ; i ;... ;; ✓' `. � r' � , / �,,, �,�+� '' ri ii y ii 1 i � if '� t1,N i,+• ti\ JS: '1 14 i .tit ♦ ,, 1 i+. ✓,/1t'. ^ `„`-• "'('.'°/, i.y... \iJ \i r( �., ie S•`."r. 7 't, �rti `\i }I� iii r. 4. ♦. it'i i. ,� i� � l it � i itl �Ni, �� t`• •P• i1. il�r '1\�� ','•• � �l - i\b Y�ir ,.y 1. e. i, , � � ,: t i r ii �; a ♦ i, i '.� '\. T. �i i i ' : \ � •rte ✓ `. 9! i'y i,1y♦. ry i i i '� , , i .� j� j `� il\ ;1. y i.5 i :-. i • � '."- 61 \d -- 1'0 �,, i i3jii +>; ` b. IY r • i o i J, � �' .. 1 ',, Yy � �.�,,' \ i� i. id;•. J `�'♦ - �, f i S .• ,.: } ..� •.15 + 4 i,. Y IN W �J. r ''. it \ t iy . i � . f i . 5 i i % , ;�: yq s. - +•.1,i Slid 1i ,ly r, r Y•, S • �\• ..1. •. •♦, .i. .il b- iii 1 i .lir' rn I iill..lii \r' ... i • I \ w, ,y' r v r `a +��ry �'t it 4 ti • \ �i iitYi,l++�,�w ��i S�lirr.•���',✓..r.�_ c�/' .;r i \ .✓ �..' } /�. \I , , 1 .f �, •. i. � ): ✓\\• 4.II �• h!, W� r \ i✓r r.•' J•�r."\.... �w� + . �,,% i •' ^+ -.i (' S � _. 1•i,�=i „+ \ \ i Y i \• . 51_ s �,/ �, • \ I� .n ✓ .. ' X51 - •%'". \ (r + i .. . \ �`'•J , � t it i• i �i 11✓•\ .y` � ..�4i y \i 3..�\i` •ci., �, j�✓�,. +}"•�"'.. � i >t 1 `l -Layi �� "' i •wy % �: �, iir.i +. \,`. ;, { �}r � �1�1 s_ �� �4 �4'^.• ��.. :,1. ��� �:..+�.r"'x r,il�,,i i �' �✓ � � W y \� • 1 i r1 JJ, Jif i ` Y i `yam . i ' �" . .v'�' . i' � : , •, u i , .)iii a'' i! `'41r1. •'eg'. � .enr *w � r,K P .. � v' . .iyi 1 r •«1V.�r„�N'•re \ intorintofgyJ1 r;�1 /gy��(j1 [��py ( 1 }rMy�( ,�tnj],/,�yJ -"D0 �\ ■GY�r��Y�v��4•'�M PtlO� (`�1 (p,,�; 5/'t('t�{{�'. yp�}y(e� oM a4YM.0 iG■. TO, The Butte County PIahoing.,Commission FROW The Butte County` Environmental Re,y'i ew 'Commi ttRe ,SUBJECT, Northeast Chico ',-,rezone. ; DATES January 21 1974 �. r ' The Environmental ,Review Committee on December 24j 19731 finding that the circumstances bf the project are essentially, the same, .accepted the final Eny'ironmental impact R,ep,ort pre- pared for, the rnortheast Chico rezoning, r on, which 'a Notice ro f • ' „r Complet pn of"the ;Draft Eiiv7"r,onmethtal Impact Report on t o e,ct was filed October' 23,,,;1913 p • j , as' [[ �1�1 ,...;. the Draf :„EnvirPhmen tal Impact Report for the Willriam Lee Sims II.9 etal, applica, • tion for rezoning from "S-2” (Minimum Density Suburban Residential) Interim to "S-1"`"(Minimum Density - Suburban Residential)forthe area described as r south of Sycamore Creek, east _of'Gohasset Rd•,� north of Lupin Rd an,d the east- �I I erly r prol ongati of ,,Lupi'n 'Rd , i denti f ie d as AN',. 48 -Or=< 5 ,of AP 48=02-340 AP 48-•p2-35, AP48-02-36and,,AP .•� 48-02-37 11 i �� containing approkimately 626 a4ttos ;1 L _ ( ; r f .c .' u ADDENDUM 'TO l?. ti IRONMENTAL IMPACT' REPORT T"OR`" FTNti'L ENI NORTHEAST CHICO REZONE „ r' 15143. (b) .:, An_y Adverse tfivironmental Effects Which Oann'ot �Be Avoided of tyeProposal is Implemented: Commissioner Watson requested that st Aff t;I,Lve ,'- , ,. further consideration t - the proxi,mit,of� th�„�:..a�r;port ,,. to the area. The proposed rezoning would result"in residential development in 'ache iortliwoste ly portion t of the rezoning az ea wha chi falls within ;,6e flight ;1 � pattern far the Chaco Tuncapal Airport The existing zone/i otuld allow similar densities plus ad04.3 70hrj31 ff use d. Tht State Apr utids A , r �r r c x` k �` e � , cat7.u.:ga'c r'ac�{�7a.ntr;�ions of p%p_�tf.l`c���:si�tki'srr� 1 )r would allow 'a greater conceritra`ta an, of gdPtilati'on than Voul;,ii an, alternate,-zone with a ;l .zger rat' sXze. r c) M'iti ation Meastire4s Proparjed to Minima�a 'the Impact; 3 _, The effect of zoning ori' that area falling wi ithin the flight pattern for the Chico Municipal. Airport could `1 be partially mitigated by requir-ing a larger jot,; ' `size and, reducing the pote:?tial maximum density. t - pP p . , g The most a ro r� ate mita ata ng measure; however, would be to zone the area to restrict the use ot=6'ring within the flight pattern to non=-resideritiaL uses, Possible alterAatives are 'industrialpark zo ning j open' space uses, i.e. golf dourses, open space, etc .r muncipal uses Niaste disposal. sites; storac,4""Y I d, etc. f, I� 7 v (d) Al.terriati'ves to the Proposed Aotion ., Cotadtsionei: s Smith and Hanford regii&sted that addi 'ioiia�. consideration be given eto the. alternatives of the proposed actionj particulAtly consideration Of thAL! ''S " zoneL The alternative referenced iii the original report was to require a i'large"r ` to{.: i' i7le with the same Lange of `-restiicted uses allowed . the us-l'' LC�iie;. That comment wota.td be applioa i, ,, 'a a; the ris_Z1� zone or any othr',,zone which tequrcda, _...... larger lot sizes The larger .low size could reduce ` . the density as previously referemoe'a in the report, the lesser `density and .obvi6usly wd,�O,,d potents decrease the demand for addlitiomal. s"eYyices j traffic ' eta. in the area : t6wor don- tity and larger: lots j ma . hoisevor lead to -more tapaid &vel,oe tent of other areaw' if th�.s area a.s develped a}�.� th lower densis ties and the gro%vth ih the Chileb area ,cbh-E hU08