HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT. 78-9 1Yry
d
1 } A Y'
1F I � ♦ 4 hl 'y "�
V � 1
I� 4 e. 2yA+rS,rt�P 1 e
I r
it 1,
Pal
s�l4 ttI 'tjj
gt
1�i` !�,(�t,t,sl r;t {
'si` di�� rx IN�'rfi t t rte •w °ji GAJ y tfia
1 .w , I _• � ", as! F� x r �tljY,frlt
F.,•'f�S,i f i4i�)Ily:
%
3 YE 5 NIftM
140
g xpasure of people or, prverty to
goologic hazards such as earthquakes,
landslides\ mudslides, around failure.,
or similar' 3lazards?
�.
2 Air 4 Will the proposal re suit in:
5ubstantia1 deterioration of '"ambient
Ae
air quality?
�
b. The creation of objectionabl
odors?
c.' S3.gnifcaht' alteration of air, mpvemexa.,
mpisture 'pr temperature, �or any dhange in ;c' imate,
,, y y.
:a.the,r locall - or regianall
It
Will the proposal esul
in `substanl:
a� MC)nanges in currents, or the
,,course
or di; ect,a.an of water mov
k�. Ck�anges in absorption rates,��
drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff?
teratlions :,to the' course or,
C. Al
flow of flood waters?
d, Ciiarge
in 'the amount of 'surface s
w Atexj. in any water body?
>� a �S$,scharge into surface waters, or "
in a0y alteration of surface water
qualJI!' y, inoluc ing but n;ot 1IJM ted td^�
tempdirature, dissolved oxygen or
tuU.
rb:'E,dity?
s n
f ; alteration of the direction or
rete of flow, of ground water?
'r g Cl►ange `.in the quantity o'f grounri
water;, either `through, direct addit-ions
or W1UdraWa is , or through interceptio
of an��aqu�Fer by cuts or excavation s
a
i
11 �,
Append wage 2 af'��
A
,
YES" IAvBE
NO
n
Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise ayvrailabi'e for public
water sup plie, s.
+t Exposure o£ people or property to,.
wa,te -related hazards such as' flooding?
�.: 'Plant Life. Will the proposal result
in suhstaiitials
Changein the diversity ;of species, or', �
number-o£any species a£ plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, crops; microflora"
a,
and° aquatic plants)
o
ki Reduction. of tshe numbers; 'of any uni.ue,
J
rare or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction 6f new. species of plants
�rir to- an area, or in a barriex to the
'o C
normal_ repler`ishment f existing speeiesl
d . aacreage agricultu alRcduct on !'
crop?
5. Animal Life. will the proposal -result in
Substantial:
a Change :� n the diversity of specx.es, or,
xiumb ' ' f any :species of' .an,'ima�.s�t(birds,
lend ahl mals. including reptiles; fish and
8h 1e 4,'sh; benthic orc�ariisms-, in'sect's or `
microfauna)?
b;'; Reduct, on" of the numbers of any, unique,
�
rare or endazzgered species ot: animals?
c`. 1 troy uction of new species of ahiMa4 is
into an areae Or result in a. barrier to
�y
the migration or move0tent of. anii 418?
Aet:er, i'nratiori to existing £ishy,or'
habitat?
ildlife
,
6 . noise Will the proposal result in
s�ntial
levels?e;
a. increases in noise
4
b. Exposure of people to sev6te noise leveis2
��
A' ndi't )p page 3
•
0 8
t:
,
YES , AVBL
NO ;
7.
i
Licht and Gi'are. Will the i_,roposal -'prod,
�e
significant Light or, glare',"
£3 .
sand ,'.:Use... Will the ro os
c p p '�.1. result,, in a
„t,
substantial alteration of ,
E(
�1� planned land
'
use Of,an area?
9.,;
Natural Resources Will the proposal result'
in
, substantial
a Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources?
ki ° ;Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?.
1D.
Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve
G
a risk of an 'explosion: or th"e reiease, of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil,'pestioldes, chemicals or
radiation`) in the event Of an accident or
upset condit�3.on, ?
PopulationW`11 ,the proposal significantly
=
alter the location, distribution, density,
or growth tate of the human population of y
12.
Housing. Will the proposal. significantly
".affect
existing -housing, or create a
demand for additian.al housing,
t�
13.
Transportation/Circulation Will -he ✓f
-77
;proposal result in. 71,
a. Genexat ' n of substantial adda.t on al,
vehicular: movemen';;?
;
b. Significant effects On existing, parking
r w paparking?facil`i.tie�, or demand for ne
c Substantialpact ,upon ei'sting,
transportation systems?
d. Significant alterations to present
patte;rnss of circulation or 'movement
of people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, pail or,
air traffic?
Appondix F page
4 of 8`l
Il
ANIL
YES W
MAYBE
NJ
f. increase an traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
11.
Public Services. Will the proposal have
-
an effect upon, or result in,a:substantial
need for new or altered governmental: service's
in any of the following ateas.
; I
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
C;. Schools?
d.: Parks or other recreational facil3,ties?
e. Maintenance ofpublic facilities,
including rogds?.;.
_.
T. Other governmental services?
15.
Energy . Will the proposal 'result in: , �S
a� Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy?°
b-. Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sourc.�9 ofIlenergy)
I
.LL is.
Utilities. Will the proposal result in a
need'for new ystoms,,or substantial
alterations to the"fo116Wingutilities:.
",
�
i „
atu r
a. Po�l�r,,or n al gas?
I
,b. Communicationssystems?
c. Water?
AN
4
C1 . Sewer?
17:
Human I3ealth. Will the proposal result in: "
a. Creation of any health''hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b . Zx'posure of .pe:ople' to potential health
hazards'?
, Appehdik P -
page o ; 8
V. ax ,,
APPENDIX G
NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
I.
NOTICE IS ISWBY GIVEN that,, the project described below hats
been revi.ewed'pursuani; 'i;o the pxov�,s ons Uf Lhe California
Environmental Quality Act of 19`70 (Public Resources Code
211100 , et se9.) and a determination has been made that it will
not have a significant effect upon the environment.
tog7 7 -In -14-Q3
2.
DESCRIPTION Or, PROJECT;
1tezone++ from A-2 and Interim_ R-11 to R -N, C-2, 14-1 and P -Q:
5,
10CAT16N OF PROJECT':
South of Oroville, east of Southern Pacific Railroad, and north
of 'Ith;ac,a Street.
4.
NAME AND ADDRESS Oil"PROJECTAPPLICANT:`
Butte County P1arlhincJ Commission
7 County Center Drive
"
Oroville, California 95905
5.
MITIGATION MEASURES:
6..
A copy of the Environttiental ,Review Director 's"initial study
regarding; the en'Vironmental eff Oct of thi.:s pro ,J ect is attached.'
This, study was
K Adopted as presented.
Adopted with. changes. Specific modi.fic.ati.ons, and
supporting reasons are attached.
7.
A public hearing on this Negative Doclarati was heldby the
deoision malting body.
,Hearing body Butte County Board or Super.0 sons
Date of Determination
Determination:
Qn the basis of the Environmental Director's :initial study,
the information presentedat hearings, comments received on the
proposal and our own knowledge and independent resear6h::
;5
Q,
;r
App endix G page
u
LJe f.nd theproposed project
COULD ;NOT have a significant
off oet' on the, environment, and a, NEGATTVB DECLARATION is
hereby adopted.
We find that thJe pro j ect
c d have sighif i cant of i'ect
on the environment but wi
,l not in thy case becautse `'of
a�Ltached mitigation meas
res described 'in item above
whici are by, this refer
ce made coedit' on i p o j ect
OC-
a roval. A conditiona
approval.
NEGATIVE DELL l s' ereby
adopted:
0,1011,
AT
Sig
r,
y -
,
Robert A. VJ nsto-6
Name
v
Chairman, "8oavd Of Supervisors.
Title
i
r
Apendit G -page 2. of
6
L,UTTB COUNTYPLANNING. COMA4ISSION
une 21* 1977
INUTPS. June,
r
_ — If
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
M1,NUTES - June 27, 1977
A. SOUTH 'Or OVILLE REZONE
08_.2-8•T8
In response 'to a question from Commissioner Stutz, Mr.
Lsaw.,on said
that :Land use study had been completed
for the South
..Orovill.e area
.th
-in cooperation with Larry Brooks of the
Administrative
office --and
that staff "shotila have 8- proposal for the
Commission to
look at next
meeting.
hi
f
tua
r
t
1
u
I