HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT. 79-25 5i w D
a
t o:
Board jof Sup etvi so rs
FROM.Environmeio.tal Review Department ;r
suarEcr; ;o'rmilliot/Drew Rezond (Stonybrook Estates) `la.
DA+e, f;, Ja.n.t1.ary',-•1.1, 3_980 ,
,
Although the CRifor this pxC�joct has previously been before
you, in connection with a regLlest fora General .flan Amendment,
it x �;=till a "draft" unt' l T.uesday's;;..pub i,c ho4,j,ring has been
,
helirid, all ''comments �gd.dre8sing s-ifficiency of 'the EIR and
conc8lrning any signi ticant environ; iii ental factori� have been,
responded to in writing, prion tai ETR certification.
There may or ni4`y- not V6 additional- comments received at the
hearing" since this project Is not too', controversial;
If your decide to approve tli; j rezone, required findings itcl.ucl.o
r. (l!) whether the project will " resu.lt in significant adverso),,.
environmental eff ecus 9 (,2) if, so whether them, is an env? ron--
mentally, 8upezllor a'l'ternative or, .feasible. iuiti6at .on, measures,
.�ntl what "overriding consideratioxis" _ justify pxroj'dct app; 6val
n
the face of an'tca.pated adve� ''eviroxnenlal. effects:
Since the land is marginal.,>for agx ;�L'�ure,' nee ��s min. -L'
Yedetal flood hazard. standard s"; , za a d.gvolo ia7g area and i
was recently de, (Agricti�lk'uraal je's dent11al) n U
the ]'sand Use Map., of tN-) 'Butte ;C;oUnty General r1lan, perY�,aps
a finding Of fio significant 81`tect could be con.sidere&t
; Responsibility for °the findings, of course, rp;,ts with;{the
Board,,
Al
r wilj,be at Tlzeslay's heaa,ir� to assist; in `bl' Ing this
matteto ncl us,i=4 if you have any ques-tious,, please
give mecall
Sincerely, „
Earl D Nelson
Environmental ReviewDirector
c EDS
co; Bettye kaiv
0 ti
p ,
r
n
z
4,77
1 1
32
rr«
F I l ,, 1
i
.
y-'..ter_,:, I ,
X ! Y
b
•
R
1
:
f�
l y
r
1y
Y
� x
A-20
Y
ky��y
� r
JC N�ll
A,fI
\M
MAr
HEt'l r r
. tg i�►i
•
m
{.7 ��i x7 R'lt ��7'Y� /: 4✓+l'�'�ci � u ' ' (A1 u'. � Y 1!7 ,moi+
7h.`v.,_. ..h.sYr.1�i�