HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT. 79-3 1Mu NLY
4 �,P 4
c J C r is J
�a
�
AP1?N17TY, E �
E
Da d' Filed M
1,
�� rmatott 1a`A�Xaa
}nv�,•ronmcn�al,1.:�n:Eo' �
In
(To be �r�'''`�1�� ��� by applica�i��);.a
OENERAL INFO- ;3'..TON'
l.. Name' and address ,:�; ? `decrel open or, proj ect spy ,"srr ;� ELIZABETHy'.
yY
r�xttilIg. _L�t�t�t��.k
04 Ch�c�S,. Calitorn�,�w959.2ki f
N?
Bell & Alamo Road Chlor, c r.
�. Address o� xo eCt, 4
Cali�orh a
Assess.ax's �l,ock 8.r.d Lot Number #42�02-13 "S ,
^_a;, ��
, .,address , and tele hone number of pc W ., I
t�a. cgntacte
cat'laeriA4 this project: , G�. W. Ba(�hman B?1CIile,. h�NG CNR1 ING `
c�
91.6) 342-4186
.E 6.,.dhc3012 TheEsplah1 aiifo a 95926
pe of project. y (i
c
1a. if xe8idential► include the,number of units, s01.0,t«lu,1e of unit
:>
sizes, and type of household size expected.0
17. ammerci_al,f""in.dicate the typrf) whether neighl/orhood,, Cfty"
or
fa,eilitiesiongIly ori%kited, square oote,of sales area,loading
18 if ind}istcial., indicate type, -estimated employmena� per shift,
andl,oadi rig .facilities
l9s if nst�tu.tional; indicate the
major' funs tion, 0-S t'.1mated
a tolcorr ont ,,te;r, shift, estitnatet occupancy,,loading `,fa;dij,,Itiee �
Ym p benef>,'t's to be derived frbmtll'e ro' ` e'ct .
/I P j
l
1+f the project i.r,volves a' Variance) 1 conditional. use or xezanin'
�a a �pl.1 cation, state. thiLs and indicate, clearly wh� the s ,
required
�' Y p�'lication is
°Are the f01101,7ing items' applicable to the ,P oject or, its elects,
?l
s
iscus.s lse,oi,r all tem checked 'yes (att ach additional s.heet5�. 'aas
necesSvaxy) .
'YES NO �
x 21 . Change in existing fea Cres of harry beaches, lakes; 1
or lAi.l_ls , or 8()8tantial alteration of ground celFtours 1
22 Significant change in scenic 'views or vi.stas„ from
Sr 0-18ting residential areas car public lands or: roads.
z project, p r z�hai atter of �„
enor�.l"aced ofo]eCt:
X_ Ss '►nxficantl change atte.rrl s.caIe o
x Signlfi,cant amouftn ,of,sol lrl waste or'li,,e ber
x 25 . Change in dust, a,sh, smoky ► fumes or odors it, -'
oini ty.,
�ualityy orficatt quantity, or alteratfonto eex st ound water ..
g ►
i + i
yy v� y�yLj 8 drainage
X 27. Substantial change in ey.isti.ng noise `1�r Vibration
levels in the vitin.i.ty, „j
Site on filled land or on slopo of 30 percent i-Ot ttor�,
....
29" Use or disposal o potential" ly ha .,ardou.s mate'. a7 s ,' ,r
Luck as toxic substanae8,, flamma.bles o'r O.XpIos.ives
-
Al
pn
F] _
F
10
YN S NO
X 30. Subrstantial change in demand for municipait .services
,Y
�� Police, fire wat"ear, 'sewage etc.)
X31. Substantially,,? increase fossil' fuel cons
umpti.an `
(electricity, oil, natural gas etc.'),
32. Relations�iip to part of a larger project or series
II
of� projects,., �� I�
�t'r l�tONt+ NTAL SETTING If
33� Describe the project site as it'exists before the pro`ect
g 'I obo rah , soil sta,bili.� s r
�,ncludi.n inforraa.tion on t g � y �y, plants and
ana"als, and any cultural, hi.stsrieataor the i app ctb stDes6:eibe
pects .
any existing structures on the ructilres
54. Descr_i,be,
the surrounding properties, incl.uuing information
on pl.aizts and animals and .any cultural, "historica,l or scenic aspects
indicate the type of l.and use (re s.i ddntial, ccmm roial p etc:) ,
intensity of latid" use Cone -family, .apartment 110uses, shops, department
stares, etc : ) , and scale of development (height, frottage, "set-back.,
rear yard e etc*)
• 1 '�� i
I
CnWTXPICA1 :1ON: 7 hereby certify tha,'r, the statements &finish'
above and in the attached exhibits p esent the claim and information
requi tod fo"r this arnitial evaluation to the best cif my ability # and
that the facts; statements, and information presented are true and
correct to the best of my kri;owledge and belie".
?C
Date
r r*
(Siglnature
f�
II
„ yf
,1�
,. r
or
r
f q .y
1
Ap'Send,iat E pare 3 0 3,.
,I
14 0 ) ''
" APPENDIXF
MiRONMENTAL bRECK],IST FORM l'
(To be complated 'by L' ad Agency)
`
I : BACY r9UND Log # . 78--07-20-01
1.. Name of Ptoponent ' j Plizabeth V.
Proponent:
2. Address and Phone 11u i� ,Pr o.
Route Vii, I1ox .G pu e o Bachman En 'inee
t~ing _
i;hi ro,� Cal!,ioy is 99. 26_ X0'12 The Esplanade
Chico. California
"95 926
3i Date of Chccklist Stibmitted
4� Agency Requiring Checklist
5.. Name Proposal, if applicaai e R fro A- 5,
,oi:
ZI 'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ,
(Explanations of all "yeS" and "maybe" answers are required
on Attached sheets.
Y,-,S Mhnt
NO
1. Earth; ! 14111 the pa opo gal result in significant.
a. Unstable earth conditi>j.ns or in
changes(,'In geologic substructures?
ts
b: pact'ion�ors
C
ve cdVoringnof themSoil7
do Change in topography or 3tnt��rid sures
of
fatd rej featured or eiT:oval
df
"tt
'^moi � '
d,h Dc'8t..ructioxt, covO ing or mo, f� ca-
ti on of ''any unique geologic ;dor
physical fbatutes?
e , Inch. ea
ieither
!,
- _
oils ori ortbkP t,heis to
{ Granges �n deposit�oxi or ,erosion'' .
�r of beach sands + or C�11an ins�°.i .ta=
",
t tion, dePos�.t�on or eroslo Cvh�.ch
nta ., modi- the channel of a river or
y k
` s tie. am or tits b p� d of the ocean or
an3� bay, inlets bt lakel -
:°' g, LC+ss of ptame ag�idialturdlly pro-
dticti Ve $oi.i.s outside designated
urban a.reaS?.
F
.'�
Appendix1+
MA.Y13E
aw.
NO
Exposure of, people or`property, to
geologic hazards such as earthquakes,
>
landslides; mudslides, ground failure,
or similar hazards?
2: Air. Will the osal result in:
p`ro p
Substantial deterioration of
ambient or local' air quality? �, f
b.
The creation of objectionable fiY ✓, j
(t
odors , ,smok.c or fumes? ,
c.
Significant alteration of air
movement, moisture or tempature,
,or any change in climate, 'either
locally or regionally?
3 Water . �Jili the proposal result in substantial:
,
a
,Changes yin currents,�or the course
or direction of grater movements?
b,;
absorption Chan es in on rate
b, c p s , drainiTbe
patterns, or the rate and amount of
p
n
Mc'
s water runoff's
surface w
di
Need fox off' --site surface drainage
;improvements,",_including vegetation
removal, channelization or culvert
installation?
d.
Al.teratl.ohs to the course ox' 10,0 '
of flood waters?
o.
: Change. in the amount of surface
,water in any water body
f,
D:tascharge into surface waters, or, it
in any alteration of,, aur&race
water quality, including but not
littli.ted to totinpottLtul c,, dissolved
ox. reie or turbidt ity2
Yb
L
g,
Alterat3.oh of the direction or t..
rate of flow of grouted waters?
.
``10.
Change in .the quantity or qual ty
, of ground Iwatoi;,s , either through
d3 re is at d� txo"ns nor withdrawals', ,
�
or through interception of ,�an
.
aqui`i�� ��! cots or e'kcavatiohs't
y
Ap:petidik V L page 2
of '9`
e t 1
Gr n
YE S 44AYBR NO
r, Reduation'in the amount of water
{e f , .;
.,, otherurisP available or publ.i c
nater supplies
,>
E osuip 'o people or property
to wader relate d hazard's such ,as
:L £loodinz g' ? j2f <;
t
• v n
4. Plant', Uf"e. Will �,he proposal result
in su �,tantial„
n
s
, ,a. Loss of vegetation or change i_n'`'the
LossOdiversity£
species or number
of any specie8 of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, 6 -,cops,
m1croflora and aquatic plants)
b : " Reduction Of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
�f
o£ plants'!
h'
C ._ li troducti.on of new species of
�
plants into ail area, Or in a barrier
�� t?
to the normal ) replenishment of
ekistng species`?
d. Reduction in acreage Yg' e of an a ri
cultural crop:?
•
�� .1
_ - 5, Animal .Life. ' W-31.11 the result
5
-
in substantial r
a, Change in the "diVet9 ty of species,~,,
or numbers,' of any Gpecies of
animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell-
fish, benthic organisms, insect`s or
micrb£aauna) ?
b 4 ReductiotL of the n imbers of aiiY
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
>� `> c ;" ifttroduction of new species of
aniMal's into an area, or resti'lt in
barrier to
a the m�,g rat'ion- fir,,
ino-teinent of animals?'
fir.
�d " iteducaion of') encreachtient upon, or
deter'i.oratioft to exi'sti.ng fish or
wildlife l�a'�i.i<at?
611
Appendix' page 3' of
13
YES
M AYBt NO '`
,> „
u.
Noise. Will the proposal r.esul in
substantial
p y�. +I1 ,rQ1
-a1 Increases_. in noise leVels�
'
b. Expostire of people to se`(rer e" �noisz
levels?
7.
Wight and Glare, Wil the ,I;r_oposal
produce ,;s' gni*3cant light or glare?
8,
Landes; Use,, will the proposed result
,in a significanto.
,. and use
a, Alteration of the planned 1
of an area, or establish a trend
.'
which will demonstrably, lead to such,
alteration?
b. Conflict with uses on adjoining
properties, or conflict with;.
establiohed recreational, educate
tibnal; religious or scientific
uses of an'area?
9 ,'
Natuxal Resources t+iil:l elle proposal
"
resu t In substantial;
»
a, Demand forj or increase in the rate
of use of* .
7
any.�natural resources.
b. Depl'et'ion of any„nonrenewable
natural rosourtd?
�..
10,
tti8k of upset, Does the proposal
,involve a risk of an explosion or
t'te release, of hazardous substance
r
(1nc].uditigj but not limited to; oil)
f°
peg ticides chemicals or radiation)
in the event'of an accident or upset
t
conditi.tins 7 �: t
11,
po ul;ati op.. dill the proposzI
signi,icaritl.y alter the location]
distribution,, den8ityj or gtot+tth
a
rate of the human, population, ofn
area. nr , hy'sically divide an
established community'
'
12,
. proppsal
.. will,
LO
.>
"
E.�
ni i; antlylaff ” t e�eiseing housitigj
or create; a demand Por additional
housing?
t
9
{ , Appeririik F ps,go,
4 of g
p MAY3t
NO'
13.
Ttatts" ortati6n/Cl;,rcti:lati6n Will ' th.e "1
proposal,, rest?. t"�.n—,
'
a. Genexationic of 8tibs,t an additional
c9
vehicular`' movernd:nt'.?
_C
4 I
S i_ nif 3�c a , „ f ing
g nt of 6ct,s? on exist
„
parking Fscilities.; or deinarid for
nevi paarking .
c. 5 z'ost �°tia1 iQj,a�ct upon existing
trta.nsnot tationf.sys tems !
d. ignifi ant 0.r terat ans to present "
;pa: tern,'of t' i rculatiatt or lriovem-nt
of pecp,e and%or ,goods? -=-
,.f
e.l�ora'ciori 16waterbbtne, rail or
u
ti
air -tt ai flc?,Ij f
f tncr,Lse in,"traffic hazerds,'"to motor
{?
veh'Ccles, bicyclists or pedestrians?,,
<,14,
Pldblie,, Service�,s 11ill ,tie proposal have
.
giin, e ect u oro, or result in a substan.ti.a
r
for xq mental
eany
s7erviceieed . .
-s a of, theafollowing are I.
a Fire p,rotcctio�?
b1' Police rotept 6n7
G8Chools
:
o Warks or other raecreatir�nsl
facylit'ies!
.,Maintcnande .of public faci lifter,
including roads?
f : Other governmental services?
y
.5
,Vnotgy Will the proposal ;result 'tit
j�
f
a, Use of substahtilal amouftts 0 .fuel.
or Gnorgy'r'
Si_tb s tranb is l increase �.n demsn t
b :. , . d upon
existing sources of energy, �-or�
a _.
re ui�e .the d o m t ,of nett
q c`�e l p ert
sburccs of energy
6 :
l;;
Utilitios t All the proposa� resiili°
a. a nee for- rietayst;ents, or sz b
stantiAl AltetAtions to the; fol ,o i ng
',
�
ixt�..li�•�,as � �
I..
_ �.... iiY. si •i il'r �:+
s, n� W `ur:. �,:, kn�:t« l A
I
�~ r /P
a. Power OWer O r natural gas? ,
~ �b QbmMuii atZon )/
p —
ti G S S Ste'(T15r? ,.
a
.�
�.. �
C.
�Water-)
d ,y,.Sewo (will trunk• line be extended
providing capacit,1 o
tserve new
,
development) ? ,.
e. Storm juater drainage?_'
1.7. Human Health, Wi11 the proposal
result in`,
�1
a. Creation of any
l�f�Iealth hazard or
potentZal healthhazard (excluding"
;I
mental health) ?
b: txpTsure of people to potential
...�
hoc, h hazards?
18, So1:2.d Waste, Will th-r', proposal result r
ih an siLft cant Zm cts ass,ociatod
with solid waste dZsnoial or, 1iter ,
control?'
19 , Aesthetics'. ii Will �he proposal result
y
�.n t e o "strUctiorc of a ►v public
de81gnated or rdcogn�.z:ed "s` �eiic 'vista �
{" open to the public, or, vtill`ythe i 415
proposal ii.sult 'in the creati6h of an �.
aegtUh %AicaftY offensive sil- e open to
public vibw7
Recraatic n.\;`{ W',ll the proposal. �rea�ilt r
an impact upon fthoivaiity or
..
t�blio recrea
tionfacalities7t�z�;. �' � ry�
100, Bolo y cal/Ristorlfbal, Will She
,pr ;}osa 'resu t �. - r a. oi` at.inn of it �
s�.gnificant A' ; 11 �ilog 1 1 or
historicalsate; strtic• tire, object
or buildir►g?
MdtdatOr .; �' ,� nK�.n u t�.f s. P,v ^.�>f`J� d_Ai
A, Does the pro j Oct lts�ve tate pot e%j':,.,J
to dcotra.de the quality :of the
on ir�.�n�e;i�t, su�ast��ntia�ly
the h a� itk
at -'adI, "a 'i.sh or wildl"i�".�`e�' I
SpeclQs ; y atise a .+r'1sh , tC4i,'Id a fe
"opulat'i6i� to 'drop bOlci r, s l 'r
c�
_ _ p cliff page.. 6 , 62
,
4 YES
,
MAYBE NO
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal coin-
murtity, rndt�ce tl�e number or°,restrict
%J
thr, range of a rare or endan i red
plant or animal or eliminate important
'
examples of the major periods';�of
�
California =history .or prehistc+ry?
b.. Does the project have the potential
to achieve shortterm bene,fits�, fo
w
the aetriment of publicly adopted„
`
long-tOrm environmental goals??`
t. P,oes the project have impacts vffilich
are indi.vidUally limited, but
rj
cumulatively considerable? (a 'project
may impact
ori,)two or more separate
(!
resources where the impact on each
resource is ralativply small but '
II
cohere the effect of" the total of
those impacts on the environment; is
�
s 3,gnificant . }
Does the project have environ, n- tal
„
effects which will cause' substantial,
adverse effects oto human beinfl6
' ei'trtier 'directly or itirtirectly,�-'
�f
j
s ,tii� l
,
f
e� ipen
... .... .
i
d`� 1 p,�'96 7 of
,
III DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ;EVALUATI6N \;
r Y
"
�:
This proposal is a rezone `from 1-5to5-.��"} Agx ic�:��.�l�u.�'a�.-5 acr��.�,xn�rnum fir'
parcels. -to Suburban -Residential.' whi ch ,r'11-ws J�are:els of 8'125 scltxare
fee )with the intent of creating :C6*/,%�esidon
tial parcels. The three
acro,, property (AP# 1� 2-02�-13) li es 11;t�rtdxh s�t of Chico aid f;ron'ts ons
,souththe level of Bell Road �J us�L west, of Alamo Avenue`. M%e land i's;)
nearl
y and consists of Vina loam soil, whioh is atter"oductive,
t agricultural soil. The si�t,� has previously. been altered_':�or re'si_,
"dent'ial use and agricul,turral uses. One residence and a iac�,� agr --
cult"ural shed lie on the ri'astern portion of the property rneatAlamo
Avenue. The westeviL portion (approlximately two acres) is pasture
f l and .
The area surrounding the property generally is in ag.M_cultural uses.
{; Pasture laxed. lie's adjacent to i'Y`he south with 6r°Aaards beyond, that
further south ,Pasture 'Lands d6ha corral areas l;ie to the nortd
across Bell Root. Se` oral urban -density single-family re8idendes
r:r lie to the eai along eastern side of Alamo Avenue. Qrch�i
s
c - '
1 xr
4(d) The proposal wouldeven•t'ually result in loss ,of paObure.
'The area is laxgely agricultural.
8(b) The ,area is in agrioultura7; uses' predominantly. Vexy light
; Iesidential use occures in. t;he, area generally, though the si b j eo t
property has half aoxe -residential, parcels adjacent to 'the west and
noarby to the east along Alamo A�An io'. " Approval of this rezoning
could encourage furthers similar iezonings on nearby lands. „The
land su.rroundipg this property is zoned A-5 also. This proposal
could a growth trend in the area toward :more intensive
reidential iise. The 'reduotiox of agricultural acreage could be
signiXicant if the trend of rezonin.gs were to occur and a cumulative
lossolb`f-agvicul:tural land and use could ultimately occur, "Thin
rezoning would be the first such down-zoning in the, area in. this. A--5
districti Where is a poten.'tial for cn�.troyorsy i'rom area property
owners. This A-5 district has existed sin6e June of 1968 and includes'
all tho `lando to the north, west and ?ouch. A Planning Commission
proposal for e�etonig the laud to the east of Alamo Avenue from A--2
o SR, Suburb@,n-Resid.e;o°tial, and the latid to 'th(' northeast of Bell-Mobile w'
Yoad. from A- to RT" I, Minimum tensity Resid��nLi.a;1Homo, 31 �
g1 ,0 curvebtly awaiting conda,deration,.. (enviro=ental review has been
)i accolft ish.ecl, and an BCR is on fxile�.
n.. -xthis 1=
'12,�. The rezones wiI'l gonevate increaEped resldential development
�and popu7 .atio:a i al agricultural arca where light residential use currently occurs* An estimated, 10--12 residences are potential on
the three acre site, ultimately. This development would bd consistent
with the residential use on' the east side of Alamo Avenue and the
71 mobile hones residencos adjacent to the West- However, this hon- asbd
residential use may not be `compatible with the general agri6ultura
area.
13(a) : Curro 't trafw` c use in the<area is light, with �`,�i average
daily traffic voles' el of 690 AUT' oda Bell Road just west of 13ay Avenue
east of the project site, Approximately 70 to x100 vehicular trips
per day could be t�dded to this i exi. ting traffic cin Bell Read if the
devslopmen°t potontr.Al „OtP th:e site under the he proposed none were actually
rea�.izod.
The anticipated division of tho property- into :tclnr parOls wbi 4 j
8rino:l.'Cate .. �`'�v`,'1'V ATT) 1;4r?Y eve.ti.
o l,�
19i The Droyposal would result in a change in the appearance ;of the -
Site 7ronVoruning the pasture lands to residential
}l
use."
Appendix q,."G 8a of
_ 11
I
if `•
ti
,
J r
SUMMARY OF --a FVALUk ON
�l
Although in the same general vicinity as the Northwest, Chico Rezone
dais pro ject diff ers froom. it in, that thin project consists of and is
totally sur -rounded by a precisely zoned area,- an existing A",5 district.
Tho Xorthw�est Chico Rezone, on the other hard., is presently zoned A-2,
caul represents an effort to establish for the first time precise zo.a-
a ext a fiver a wide area. This project is very small. in scale and° direct-;°
ly affects only �'�the A�--Sr area, posslbly setting a precedent for, f .cure
rezones in MY 'parts of this A--5 ��ea. 'Phis possibility is too,,
speculat,Ive for evaluation, although it is acknowledged as a likely
possibility. The zoning requested is coneistent kth.the general,
plan as this area is not presently des�gnated on the Oo�.,nty Gbnoral
Plau map for prd8ervatl'on as agricul,tdral Land.. From an environmental
standpoint, p , a. she magnitude of the impacts of this individual proposal
are not great and therefore a negative declaration is recommended.,
,�8ut the possibility "of c=ulat ve effects which are -too speculative
for evaluation is noted, and we therefore recommend that, following
adoption of a negative declaration, consideration be given to the
areawa.de 1
planning and zoning implications of this project decision.
pl�(N'ote. the prof-01,11ity of future ppzones of tli�s type at this l.oca"
1 Lion cannot bemons tra ued with, suffic�er�;t rel�.abilMto invoke
�, Section 'l5�i$2
the cumulativ',e��effects�itpx�o°vis on of of the State
i
8]R Guidolines which would mandate an.'Sx .)
.r
cz
i A. �.
t�
r `'I
o
F
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION E'D
MAR 151,879
T0: /7 Secretary for Resources
1416 Nin.bh Street, Room 1311
Sacramento, CA 95814 C1„,4RRA.NF
USON, Co9pi/ Cork
Dppvy
I
Gnunty Clerk
, County of Butte � FROM; Mag, Agency),
Bird u�tl
Street Cor
Uro -vi , Calif ornLg,: , 95965 En'ylrorunental Review Dept.
;OIxntty Center Drive _
Orov;t.11e 4 Calif ornia
SUBJECT; Filin-g of Notice of DeterminatiaA-,4n Compliance with
:" Section 21108' or 21152' 6� the Public: Resources Cade
Log # �b=0�7'-20-01
Project: Title
r
Ro7,one# L02�-'1_� EJ.abeth V. Eieenhe�a,
tate Clearingh6use. Number I ,Dsubt`fitte to State C earing-.house
Contact Person, Te ,.ep ofte NumE-er
arl D Nelson; Director
Project Location,- - goad wee o oVthW A"nue.
Chico Mid fvon . aon '. e sou_ s e
or'i;hv�o�t -
of Eelam. st . enue
roj ec t Des ctip t-tQn :
c onoxom A�- to S -R. ,
This is to advise that the guttae County - Board. of Supervisors
(LO.ad Agency
has mad the .tollowing determinatio`t18 regarding t1 e above-described
prod Oct
%�% will. '
p i t :e
Will not
1, The x'o, e�.t hatre a signir�.catyt effect on t•h ,
iI enVi.rotytnet�� �t
h
21 %% An tnvironmental Impact,Report was prepared for this project`
pursuah to the provisiot8 of CF'Q%li'LlEotnia
aftd was certified as
,a u, ttd b Section 150S5t , , 1 Administrativer.Code
a .`� y �) 4
% A Negative 1)6clatat on''was ptepaxed dot this project pursuant
to the ptovisions of CNA, A crpy of the Negative Det araw
„ tion 'may' be ekatAined at the );tyva xbntnenta : lteviec;,• Department �
Cot;rtS��ueriter Drive, Orov.l] e, Cal form 9595,
3� L, A "Not i-ce of E:xempti:on was filed indicating this „projeet!� i.s-
e teffipt from eftviranmental, roVieW,
Appet-p,�gd Iof 2,�
,
�� c
9
APPENDIX G �� , ��-
TRONEATIVEDECLAR1T]ONREGARDING,N01ENTAZIMM02ACS
'
NOTIOE ,IS BEREBY GT'VEN that the pro j ect described. be(5vi has ;
Veen review .pursuant to th'v provi8i6ns of the California
�
r ,
nv vonmental Quality Act of 'I�?O (Publics Resources Code
. 2 (C et se anal a determination had been made that it wi11 "
u
_. ...• ,
j
40-t�`h``r-e a,�si nificant eff' ct upAc�n the en�ironrnenL.
I.
Loi ?8-0"j-�200'I
D,.udRSPTION Oki ;PROJEOT: ,
;u
Rezone from A-5 to S -R on�'Ap#
r, U ,
v
t
LOOA'fION Off" PROJECT:
`I rthweot� sof t hic6 and fronts on the soVbh iso Eek i Road.i,� t
'.�
(, ,rest of" Alamo Aven'ne.
4.
NAME A�M, ADDF;ESS OF PROJEOT APPLZC. XT
Bli zah,�th V., Eis en#ol.r ��,
Rou�Ge;-"'6 Box%1Or� ,
� Oh�,do� Ca lif'orn.ia 9%P- �.
MITIGATION MEASURES: '
W
6,
T ew' Dl rector' s " n' t� al .stud
regardin� the environmental, ef:Ntt bi this rc� ect is attached:
phis study was
X Adopt,od. as Presented:'
„
1
Adopted with char es: SpeCa f C mcd.ifie ons and '
port ng reasons are' attached..,
�.
�A: p�.lb- � � ti � � heid by the
li' a heaving o this Ne9. -qbl re I7ocla� t� ox Was
"'
d.eC3.s�ibn �ialw�.n� `bod.y.
a
:, B�ti,o Colirit - Eoard o Super,i scrs
each n bo - y�
dy
Late cfDet'erm natan
Determination. U
,
rr
On the ba it ,� th;eLn�t'�ro�Smef tai I� ,reCtor� s'; init,aa�: tud�;
the .Jnformat" on. prese.'nted 841 _a_Yas; cbmmen�s rc�rei�od on the
r`eh.
and our�xb xl M,ow:Ledge and' ��ade�en�onr� resea01
,proposal
ll
I�`
i
'•
iy J
F,.l,p ail J�I ' X11. �.
U
x 1
s
if
Y
» T NOT have a
e find the proposed p' roject CO'.�L':,
si nificant
g
e:�,f ect on the environment, and a NEGATIVI DECI ARA.TT09' is ' ";
�., Thereby adopted. t�
�.�,.
1
,,1
signif
'We, --,find that the xo '�ect .. eou ay a sa nific nt ef;
�,
.-
on the environment btl:� wil not x�' tli' s case
cause e�\
atte' hed mitigation measu e`s, described
.n ite
r 'above X,
which are by this ref ere 0e macho ootid`
'ions, o
rojec
ap`ova� A condta ona N,G ATIVE EC ARATt
�p
ii he by
4
addp ted..
,
u
a
2 1979
�� "
;
DATA: 1
Sign tuz•e
1 '
, Ro'be'rt tin
u
,
Chairman, Board O Supeevisbrs
f Tit 10
� .3 �V
,1Q
tt
1
;i ApAYldia'
Page 2 of 2
42-02 13%'
i
4'Li 02-22 ;3"
42 -02 23
Elizabeth
Eisenhotar
, ;
V "L. ,' E.. R. Dean;
011
. fi K. 'Horn
;
Route 6 "'Boli.4�?4
Via.
���
2:6 `�+�
t
Rt�i 4,` Box 412,
Rt. 4�', BoX' 4-1
Chico,
r
Chaco, Ca,,� 9592 if
l�
Chico ,• C'a. 9592E
42' 02 �54
�9fo
•��•
1
a (r
�
r
� la �
4 2 -102 -62 �� ��
lel`
��; �
2 -02 -64�,
„
D.It
L. FT 111,
�C'. �',4cCamish
Mirin.ie E."Shively i[
Michael ,Buzare11os
.• 4 0�x
Rt , '
i}
14i
., ;' ; 4 rrr _1.
Rt 6 Box. 0 1,� ;,
+ P' d. ,ro 1110S7
Chico, Ca.
9592;6
_
"(h 1co? �Ca;+, nrya26`j
C %toy' C4.
95926
,
1'142.- 0 2 -69;
�� •.,
42 '02 -70
I� 42-02-731
Salvatore. Dq,,va.zo
B .F, V. ..L. '1artinr
!
!r v. EI.
1
L. L. Tracy
„
Rt. 6 Cox
2
0.4, P
Rt . 6 Box 404 T
it 223.5 Ceres''
Ave
"
ChGo� `Ga.
'�
�51a245
,�1;�ico,.^.Ca 95926
I { Chico, C��
95926
'r
42
4?. -02•'78 1+
{{ 42 02-7'9'I
a%
_rr
Eve1 n hiax
��04N
�., `�'�
rii A: Ba7.1 I Y
Y 1
+
,; C R.. G.,, �. F. Ate'.$ss•sei�
µRt.
6, R'ox
�-
At. 6-, BOX 404 Nli
� Rt. 6`' Box 404 R
Chico, Ca.
110t`?)26li
Chico',:,• Ca•.. 9592;6
Chico; Ca 95926
y
,•,i
42+602 -82,
8
42 -0?. -'S3
42.02 "IS4, i 85 �r
E'
rre1]
I�
IV. G . 8 if. Je�nes
1`t. D. F C,�tb,,PAssszovoy
--pt
G oc
40'
118 ?��
11;,,Rd .
-t,hico,
Ca.
?9591I26
��+�i1
Ch co "a• �'*''' � 6
CHco Cay 95926
42-0 2 -,86
i . ,
4.2 -02 -$9 µ��`'
t� 42 02 -90 '
Iiathle�.� Cleland,
� f
�
R` 6 M. W111,ta�.re
L R�rshbex'ger.,
Rt. 61: i3ox
Chaco, Ca.
4�f +1i
9592b
q
" '
1581$ Chase ;�
Se,pulvedar,:,Ca. 'j9 ].343
Ott, 6`j Bo 40s
!$; rt/hicd,, Cay 9` 926
f
42 �03�i'9
�;
4�2-0342 '',I
4a' 6S37:3n
bC. be F,. N.
L. Patterson,
Mary Sah e£fer j
r
ht .,f �;'}l , C« Vii. STnith
k
Rt, 6 y So c•
406 ;r`�
��
Rt. 6,�� Boa x#0`3 $
5:5 �2fi;
Rt 6, Box $03 A.
'A
Chico, Ca.
95926
Chi CA.
Lhiae Ca 9-5;926
42-03 3
I U
X42 -34-Z4
42-34-29� t`
'V
A Ko l'b�ish
,
C A : " F I . at cart
t i
f T : D : G . B611
R . 6 ; ox
406E
R 1 y, Boit' 751!
P.0 toX 515
Ghic`� d+
9592'6
Chico; Ca, 95
26
f,
Chat6- Ca, 95926
42X34
42 -34 "S, 6''!r
42 .. 4� 5"0
Veirnari T'..
��erxis
D .,j� 13. A.f., Ai'ixrtis `
ll.. C 4 T . , 0. Tipton,
std.
Rt ,' 6; 1�ox
d66A
8ta t 20 La V'11Tt V
�i45 �,ambrad�e
Chaco, r.a.
�J59'.6
Chice`' Ca .r 95' 26
f
t.' hiaL*1.e' S riri.gs,Ca 9532
.1
y
k
r1iz°il�r��t`,1 V� Ta.snril ur, W. ;7. ^ B B +',aper t
(<nt�te Ga 8ox�'�.nG �l t, )�, `BnY` 4 a r �'
G; icn- �i50?E� s Chico, �+.�. 0592E + r! Ea ?;o; /�n'�!r
1 Cti
42-02-�0, �R,-0�»7+?
r +
:icY�tc C:�`u..arellc�s ; Sal�ao9.e DoV`�co3: Zi V. is r`ka, tiny,
P't. G,ox, 40 P 6; Iin;'+1���
Chico Co 'D59 6 1 rhIco,P5G26 Chico ca, 0,2,611 �
42 q n
.11 P.°�1; L„ ,i' t c san kfary 11. Sc'1ae�E er r
'22 35 C:ovc �1yVe : Rt h,, 11 rianY d('),A, a ftt °r � ' ox 407 P ;
ch co, C;��. 5�J2�6 Gn�ico„bc�. 96�WCs' � GStico; c 85026- �
r 1i4
91. i;. F��c. ti. Stiiyrh ,� '� ,�J ;`L ,fir. �1,-.xohl`ciu�tx �i t1, a H,; I. Cathcart
Rt._. 6, Bb -x 403 k �� 1 �F6, -Box. ox.406 8 � �� ;j:. � (^t �� Bob 75X`
95��;a ;,j � cn�ic,��� Cri._ 0S0N6 `� � �GkS�c.�, c�.`. 0, 59?��
154-59
Verttnr: 1;: :10rr!.t . 'If ` Fz \r.' A1' C,irtis
c\ r"o X1 5 , � Si,. l( P�t 5,, P,o- 06 ,7 La V” ,c to ','av
Cha.cn,Ca. J.,,c tci, c�t�, ,.;''�0'.6
,
E X14 1). T in t 0111
,3 74 5 C Am r i dl 90- Rt
54.flg o vljrilias CESi
l"i
11 a.;
'`
..nom
N
,� 5y` �it
✓'f` ) l' ~
p
Iwo
W
BUTTt_ COUNTY FLAI�NI:NG COQ ,il ll''SSION r
..
STA V'T`Nn�I� S - 0(:.tobel
w„
CHr NEGAT1,UIr . DECIsARA.,ION REGAR .
A. ,��ITEI~I ON_,1;'I-iT `�,,��; t (-9_3)
�NV.ZRM4I+IEN'1AL IMPACT` FEAS ;3 M R:kCCAITIENTIFI) _
Elizabeth V Eisenhour Rezone from "A -V1 (.'kgri`- �
cultural- 5` -acre parcels) to "S -R" (Subutba.n R"esi C�
dentlal) "property located on the 'south ,side of Bell.
Rovd, approx. 50 ft. went of Alamo Ave ', ident'i.-
z, fied a:s AP 42-'02-13, m,or;O particularly described
fLot '8 11l id►vell Third
�....r per �11116:t)ofrecord ` in Map Book S on Page H
r.
«"T ° G . , bf the Butte County' Recorder, excepting
".)" U therefrom the southeasterly.. 660 ft-.
The applicant st'a.te,s ,
"The property is ';bounded on the southW st by trailer"lots tes5
1 bust northhas been proposed for RrF
than x12 acre, The propexty,
toning, and property to the east I'ias been $roposed. for $R zoni,hg
This , •request tti�oulcl be �� ;conforma ty with t1+c''. area and give me the
'
Baine o,pt�.ons a�"others i,,l,add ac.ent areas." " <<
The continuin conflict re', a�r�,' 0 t� ieultt `al soil ani. current General
g i h'g t
Plan designations Is t�7e ci`;ztJ cal �?�� `rt�on on this appl�oation.
If the Commission as 'bi,ng t,o f�ollcija the plan now -in n e.ffbct, reHO' izang ,1
` ro5timatelvsl q' yca�r:s prior to .t1,e
that the A-5 zon-3.h ter`"'s adop ed ap,
General Plan, also acknow ediPg that the urbdn areas were established •,
as f r �G►egt as. Nerd � i1 onue, put tcinq tahis parcel. well within ,he rUrban.
y�
�� ti r
areas t}1C]7 a'r-recoiiuttendat"`�,On`of rppioval i�ou,..d be :prop'br. ,
`1f tnb, e, are Major rcvxsz"�ns aWticipated in the fbre:�eea'61e future
.7es in d,cnsit�bs . then
a;egarc��.,n,g Ltrban b�Yxndar� e,, or chang � . possxbly a
recoMnendati"on fo''r la'rgex�'`�gc�bls, or even a d h3`.aj would be in order.'
At this time, staff 18 attemp't-111g to, discourage zbni.ng a;pplicatao��g'that
aie sub'st:anfially in Conflict w th the G ner&il Plan,;+ The appli,c`�nt� in
r e 'Ras felled on the, cur int genoral plan 6bzumoht for 1118 long
this cab
tong6 plans to udevclop the �i`roperty and the Comm 4 Cs: on's TecofnMO .dations
on adj accntpr'opiert"i:es, ,' ��
b6 eons�.deri)i staff, s 'fie, mmen'dtian� re
Hing Cbmtnta �st,�Chx colte�cii�e as ifi xb`] ate5 i to t1ie`+bi%y`eral P1ai
t , .,
Th Plgn w
arda�n the �'�o�.th: es
3 atot, this evening and might pwant to continue this hear.';na hnt� 1 that
i
txme� since the subjOct PrOpot,tyad.j;'acent to the Cotiirtt�ssion °ii tiated'�
zoning
, t
S1 w
f �
BOT'.1'.E t;0 TX hX, NN�;NC; CC1Ai t G,�SfiCN 1�
. '�1 Y! 7.',T.RDUNI11to'
7trl7uc ry 24 117 :1.' Bu Cauaty l.Ioard o Ro; o .o from "S PQ
(Q� bu ban Rosidcnti.al) t o "AM (Ag"r cul 1;�'�.1.I7;al - S ac is
pa'f�coJs)' lii ohorty lodked pn tlic soca li sa'rlc of boil
�...
(� I1n�vcl, approximately5 foot-wat of Alai!;
didnt .;f'i ed dg AP � 2 µ AYI
cf rtta nAM- 5 , acres,, tor, r or Vic; �s, Chi 0
I'h i s
acons h otZoning a, a„r
esUlt of iftdequato
tili (.L ]aaorotheoragirt1 ning GIANTThe Board qj,Supdtvjsovsj atter a roquest by jamMi i Wens ana;5o
opinion kro,�i County Counsel tiv �t al]. pjo�te�.�tia8 h ithi.tt 300 foot o�
the suli,j eclN pr oi�ohty had not been no,tifi ed” pct�-suan L to �3 tte County
Codd sec.i iol 24-27, d;i.Toctecl --� ,• „ �� � ol.d. �►�,
r, �
''t11at neiv "heaxa,tt�s lye ai
Thc, Laid Use hBloment of tlio 1'iutte County VI
ly0val �?latt clesigna�0 �` the
Ty 08 low d Ashy 2esi ent:iza.l, Il to W c1 its 'ct .ts' per ac es
�? Thn PlanIni.ng `Commis-si6h hearing on' tho Or gina1 AW iM:i.on for
turning fXom A \5 to 8 It BMW ina t`9comm9nda.tioY or denial on
`,plo�ect,ezonilor�ovoltirB, 197�vi ors 8. 'xto 3odv. c,
,
BUTTE-/j GOUMTY PLANiqI Kri CnJiMZSSIQN
INUTH% 0ctb}nor 4., 1y7.8
I TErrf ON WHICH
':Y:ARI�,TI ON. REGA�tDYI�Gr
..ENV ONAi NEG;ATTVB T)T;��C
7, FNTAL 1M PACT, ) BEEN' , E O E D;
tlizAet1.
cultural Vi 5-acre �s ezane frGm ` 1A-81� ` t
�t
(Agri
p ' ', ) ,to ''S-R"' (Suburban"Rest. ,.
dential) property lacat''L�on the south side of Bell
Road, approx, 50' ft. west of Alamo'' Ave , identtii
-,
a8. 0f2.13 more particularly -,described
f`ie_3 as AP 42
1 All- of °'Lot ` 8 "B��.d.vt:11 Third Subdivision"
per m'ap of record in ,Map,, BOa}<' S ori gage 8
of the'Btltte County;,Recorder, excepting
therefrom the, southeasterly 660 f1,`. t�
79_25' `.r� 500
arl ] j t
ac.atiselson;xsoamsittted pareelli, �;:ro ect vas given a, Ne ative DecIarata.on.
Mlfi s�,,, B1,air `Bead staff findings. and `6, "letter from Arley L: Ho.-fid0n �
.asking ;that the, zoning ndt t� .-changed'.' Chairman Monett commented—t?1at
he had redgived a letter' ;from IMr, McCreec,jc.ontainxng the same re tlest`�1
Bot ,l.e inthe, applicant and Cal Bengin
'bet an enet rp, resenting the I
h
a.p�al xcarlt, spon fr. avoof thl�
e pr CC t. Mir, T�a�,Jman commented
that, the tr angu ai proportj '«7as r]i;fficult to dexl flilbp.
Homer h. Gu£Pey part oWter of the subject proport'I) said that he IiaA
attempted to bray adjoining propextjr but i,"as 'unal�le� ttS do sd;.
Nao to Bbnda, RoutO 1.; l 0''x 400Y` and Bots Jef1'efyf koute 4,. Boa 412.11
voth sp:pl<t- ia! oppositlon.
Coriami sionerStutz co i-mented. that Ms : 14orshberg� rj Owner off,, ad' oinin,�
prbp6,tty .+a`s �.ga.inst thin re oiiirig 1� t.t•. ca�sld not attend tll, medtiriig„ i
tpnigbt
�',f�'e,r discussion. it was decided ,to defer �thia`�.ti!�tter unt Tatter an
tit doelzion on P, N6R`I'}Ilts I CflltO -„Revone (78-68)
Duos. to the l atcness of the hour Narth�vest :Chico leas to tinned until
g P .p t7 t
� ldct;�her 11 as ��a's this tonin' ro” osa.l 'g�;�) .
7 .
„
. e 1
a
„ s
U
`Qr 4
kmw ,SUP ZSORS
J
October 17,' `I"p8
00
"lY n
r
76-1994, REPORT'TO 'BOARD` REGAIRDING ELIZAS 'm V:' EI5ENHOUR : INFORI�IATIOhJ
--Re g
_ i,, port to the Board re�� ardil g Elizabeth V. Eisenhoui', denied negative
6claration and'r'zone from A-5 , five acre parcels) to ''S-R`�
(agriculturalar, " f
f Roo , aPprox ate
i. d a Y
(suburban residential) p pe�rfy located on the south side of
t �� l -, ore . •cul l
50 feet west of Alamo vei;ue, identified as AP 42 2-13, m parte ar y
�described as: All of Lot 8 '`Bidwell Third subdivision "pePmap of record in Neap BookY5
on Page 8t'oF th11 Butte County Recorder, excepting therefrom the southeasterly 660 feetn
FIled for information.
( rY ll
0
1 �I
as
, u
f
t). �,• Y' a ...,:,
i
BU TTI, CVOTT `' PLANNING C OW, I I SST'h.N
�+1PI,Ui"13"S `)- Octobor 11IP7'
A. 1 ITEM ON W141 CH Nfiis;�Tl»R DECL'ARaT-TON1 RECaRDI'i'�s'+ �) (7Q 3�
ENVIRONMENTAL' 711PACI tf,AS
w
l,. Elisabeth V. �Aisenhour - Rezone from ``A-5'S (AGrr�
Cultural-(=•5-ae pat"cels) to ,kS_RS, ({auburban Ress -IJ'`
�{ 4 de.ntial) property la�,ated on the ,youth side of Be11 \�),
Road, approx. 50 f-
t, 1tiest of Alamo Aire,, ; �ident'l'
P ,� � �,V±yJ•'` '71 ,, tiT�f �' Vf L.yuLl "�f��.l. F„P t.4,}2r " 2, T'. RT t���.�T U4 �1 ib
as :
r �
y
per mai. of
record in Ti�h=ird
AL1
Lot. 8 B
p p' Boot: 5 on Wage
of the Butte County Recorder, exceptin'g
heref�rom the southeasterly 66.E ft: yl „
Cal Bachman reite'r.atod his sta-tement`„that this proposedl parcel size
�Sould not .be out of :)confoll`marie,e propctt, e,� ,on tli° . south
side of Be 11 Road �' (!
,
Opposed, Bib ksefferF, `412-B, C,),acai slope x11 opposatao1:
aiirrnan. Beii'nett read a Iett6r from } l+4ecr, 00 �y' -a,s'a in opposition:
Ch .
The hearing was closed '(2-g5)' and Commissioner Stutzs noting that a
t,g S d
enari propose; made a mot'aoii for denial. His
mots.onV�asseco�'�Ldb'yCominissioner 63'1terf� �+
AYt84 Comma.ssionc:�°° Stutz f. Gilbert; 16601er and C� airti an Btbnott:
4
ABSIyNT= GotmisS3,oner Everhard, „I
MotS'oll, Cgrried” f j
OL
a S
wO
1 ,
is .. , �✓ f ' ' } -1
i.,l. -
r !J
o
i