Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT. 79-3 21(OA4 or, October Z,49 78 f; Y A u t:. Bachman & Associates, Chico. The Engineers, on beha,If of Elizabeth fl01Hisenhour, appeal. the Planning Cormlissions" denial, • of the rezone from "A-5" (agricultural - five acre ,partals) to "S suburk-.an-residential) property located on the., s06A side of Bell i8ady approxi ila9t;ely 50) fast west of Alamo �'.V #-,ue, identified as AP 42-02-15't Chico. Set"' it 'h:aring Novembe't 21, 1978 at 10:04 a.ma �. tj 11 If 1> s '.., , ,;�'"—ter" •�,vi, .._ . ,,:.. sl , r CC : BOAJW OF SUPERVJSORS MINUTES I.IoVeWberr 219 197 78-2190 PUBLIC HEARING ELIZABETH V. EISENHOUR APPEAL OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND M-NIED REZONE FROM "A-5" (AGRICULTURAL FIVE ACRE PARCELS) TO "S-Rl' (SUTALT"AN-•RESIDENTIAL) OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOU'T'H SIDE OF BELL LOAD, APPROXIMATELY 50 FEET WEST OF AI.AMG AVENUE, 'IDENTIFIED AS AP 4,2-02-13., rIITCl1 , -' lige publichearing . on the Elizabeth V. Eisenhour appear of n egiai.i �,;lbi6tioand dr..nred rezone from A-"" (agricultural -five acre pa.rcL- ;). t0 "S -R" (suburban -residential) Of ,Property -located on the aouth,side of Bell Road, approximately 50 feet west of Alamo Avenue, r identified as AP 42-02-13, Chico was field as,, ctdvertYsed. , tat +review d:trectloi t, set out the background,. earl Nelson environmen c of the negative declaration. This property is three acres on the southwest si'u '*E Bell 'Road just to the west of the large northwest C,ha.co rezone This property has been zoned A-5 since 1968; Thin would b�,!'_`he first change of A-5 and could be construed as a precedent setting taction. It is n relatij�.ely small parcel mid he reconihtended a negative declaration. The ;.'ta-eotnding area is agriculture .and has a mixture of parcel' sizes and residential in the area. Hearing open to the public. Appearing: Elizabeth Eisenhour Ms. Eisenhour presented the hoard members with a map of the area. She set out the parcel sizes in the area There are eleven parcels that as - less tha t,)1%2 acre in size. There are nine lots that are 1/2 "or r more acres In size. There are ten lots Miat are one dere or Move* Herproperty zs not goad faa; agricultural use, There would be a division f of our,; Lots. l These would be for single dwellinga. Beti ye Blair, planning director, set out the background of the project, She posted a flap for the Board's eonsideratiorp The Planning Commission has not yet filme(('the recommenda't'ion regarding some of the` zoning in the area, This p,�oper�y is outside. the sphere of Influence, 8,1WAD and outside the urban ;design of the subdivision ordinance. The density is one to, fours Hearing closed to the public and confined to 'ther Board. it was moved by Supervisor Xadigan, sended"'by Chairman Winston that the appeal be co e denied. Vote on, motion: , AYES: Supervisor Ma -oan and Chairman Vinston N0S5: Supery snt� tK�k and 2�Iosele ABSENT, Super'A, or Ili.:eht��r No action, The 'matter wins continued to November 28, 1978 for co"ideratiori of the motion at thdk times RE6M 10:28 I ►tti� Ratvv�:rt:.o�� am. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MZNUTTS o Novemb ex 28, _ 197$ /! 78--2231 CLO'SFD HEARING: �f •• HEA?IN : ELIZABETH V. .ISENHOUk'- APPCAL O F NECATVE �,�ECLAi110sN AND DENIED REZONSE FROM aA-5�TO �SRRu, WEST OF A LOMO VENUE,CHICO: ADOPT 01?. INANCE 1979 11 The closed hearing on the Elizabeth V. Eisenhour appeal of negative declaration ,. and -dented A'(grlI -five acreparcels) to S -R" (suburban- residentia � of property located onthe south = side of Bell Road', approximately 50 feet west of ;lamo Avenue, identified as AP d•2-02-13, Chico held as continue: fi"am November 21, 7$ 19. This hearing is closed and confined to the Board. Supervisor, Richter stated he had not been present last week and he has received numerous;itelephohe calls on this matter. He stated that this property touches the City of Chico's rF.xoheL, The map indicates parcels that are zoned 'S -R. The people would like to se,- all f[a property ,( within that area zoned "S -K'". It was moved by Supervisor Richter, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and urR,tnimously carried, that having reviewed the environmental review report, #hp Board found that the proposed project could not have a significant effect an the environment and a negative declaration was recommended and approved at this time. On motion of Supervisor Richter, seconded by Supervisor Lemke and unanimously carried, the appeal of Elizabeth V. Eiseiihour was upheld, with the f hdlhg that it is,cohsistent witH the General Plan and is in the!best interest of the public, safoty and 'welfare Of the people, Ordihahce 1979 vias adopted' and the Chairman authorized to sigh. RECESS: 10:20 RECONVENED: 1030 j 1 n f7 i t ROA,.RD OF ;8 � SRS MI: M' JTE,9--�� 5, .78 0 r l {t l4 �9 X81?R242'_;RbVAi, OF MNUTE4 .' } '1',; ' { On motion of Supervisor Zemkeseconded � I i , " e by Supervisor' Madi gan 4 dcarried, the minutes of November I� w�, 28;, 1978 wero approved +` t .jta►mously Jed with the following correction minute t f asnj h llito j � t order , paragraI 78-223131h I r The closedhearingon the Elizabeth V. ��.oenhour appeal of s' � pp 'z 5 �+hegA'Il.ve declaration and denied, rezone from A-5" (agricultural - five ,�ucre iparcels) to "S -R", (suburban-residentia 1) of pro'pet y Located on` 4 >the„south side of Bell Road, approximate) 50 feet approximately west of Alamo Avenue iti idc�; tified as AP 42-02-13, Chico held as from November X21, 19A�'�,'• to the Board hearing is closed rind con£ine<< n Supervisor Richter I ;f i si.at�,ed he had not been "resent lost week and he has f received numerous calls on that tht� .Su+ ,�.,roperty irouehes tt1�4. Pa.lain;innoCainm�.ss�:on�sirezoneer.Thteemapad j' g ' indicates t� parcels that are zoned - ii' S The people would like to see all the property within that area ' zops d S -R. i' f � 1S �' ,rs < /' I `, J : 'O=oor SVTERVISORS, MINU11.'Es-. Doc ember , 1978 r' ii 11 r°r• s, 78-2276 APPEARANCE: TOM MCGRADY. ROSEWOOD CIRCLE; Mr,. McGrady spoke regarding the rezone thisBoard' had approved' last week for Elizabetb Eisenrourb- The Board had rezoned the are from A-j to S-R. He was concerned about the decision as were many property f owners. When the matter rias before the Planning Commission the,.v',-operty ' owners spoke out against the rezone and the Commission denied t�-�°ezone. It went to the Board on appea6ind the property owners were not'-there to oppose the rezone. Mr. McGrady.�,presented a petition signed by 86 people in opposition to the rezones Th1- toari is being asked to set `side their decision. Alamo Avenue is the b�epdary to future,encroachment'on agricultural lana to the west. It does create�a precedent. The rezonebeen in effect many years. He believed that it predates the General Plan dastgnati,on. Tite General Plan designates the area as low density residential. r Chairman Winston felt that the urban area should stop at, the Glenwood area which coincides with the Eisenhower property. There are many smalx parcels of land in the area. He did not feel that there should be any eX"„ensi'uh of that, line to—the west of Glenwood'. Dan Blackstock, county counsel, stated that in the case of adoption nf a zoning ordinance unless there is a mistake of fact the decision is finale+ Obviously the Board should never puL,itself in,a position to rehear a zoning matter after, a decision has4' een made. The whole idea is for everyone to come before the Hoard at the time of the hearing. If the BC?atd wants to r-,consider the matter, the action would be to refer tie the Planning Commission for recommend a iion, l `1 :.ITa - BOARV OF SUFERYiSO.RS �SIi�TkT�S 17ecembes �,��' 1978 NGB. B 7$-22771' ABPE�ittA,'OB JEFF ERY" Mr 3effb'iy spoke reg'ard ng the Elizabeth Eisenhuur rezone. His property is in a low -area. Ii" development is allowed .to continue`"' his property will be a 6vamp, He'"wanted the"A-tea left the same. 3 11 bre' _ rbOARD OF SUPL, R V'i;..t,'`.tl �INt7TIZ. December 5., 197 II 78x2279..APPEAM CBal�spokpLregarding the Elizabeth Eisenhou, 'zone. iI The area cannot stand an increase in traffic. The roads dx,,rItoo narrow. This puts the area in a bad condition. The schools will be taxed bec,`ause c, p rrvices.. there will. be more ch7dren. There �a77 be a need for more ub]c s I � 1J i! / II i. (G J. Y ` r• r ✓W BOARD OF, , SUPERV] 5 MEETING— December!_, 1978 t, t:y 78=2345 APPEARANCAi4gs ENS �) Owenthat he was representing four people regarding the Elizabeth Eisenhour rezone. They are: Mary Ball, William Jones, ". ltd�ks�rt Besser and Evelyn Mar. , This concerns the notices that were mailed out to some of the people; All of these people are within the statutory requirements_. It is their constitutional right to 'z"eceive notice of tate hearing. Mr. Owens was advised to give the names and addresses of 0— people to the Administrative Officer so that the matter could be •refu rnd g, p noting' that notices were not given +:u-cu���- f teQtPlannin ' Department nota people. Y a. �� 4 BOARD, OF si'mrsR, V �,� . ,, T, _M N G•—_ sTt�nuax','j�` 2,, 15 9 f 79-33 REFER ELIZABETH EISENIiOUR REZONE BACK TU`.\PLANNING Ct7.IMiS5I0N FOR REHEARING Dan Blackstock,county counsel, advis'od that a Letter has ' been sent to.the property owner advising her that the hearing did not meet the notice` Yey►i rements,, -The hearing %411 be reheard before the recommendations o.�l come to the Board. Planning Corr�nission4 Their" In the mean time this is a single parcel. the county is anticipating a parcel map. Inpthe event a parcel,'map is submitted it will not So through. She will be advised of thi, fact. On motion of Supervisor Le r,ke, seconded by Supervisor 'Moseley and carried, the ElLzabeth V. Eisenhour rezone was referred back to the Planning commission in accordance with the Dece)nber 28; 1978 memo ft9m Del Siemsen, deputy county unsel. co i�. r , c, , ti r J`I`,J'i�. luar, T 'C01Ji'!!YN. G CO�Y`L'I.SS.11Qt-V r U 1 y } d latoufiht the natteii to the attent on o the Coittlni.ss ion :in the form o:t',,\tlii.s ,iciverti-sed public hearing. 7 � Marr �' Bq ll Router;?6 kox 4Q41-M, Chico as ��c1 that the A-5,, 5�be return !> yi s -� � returned intlT.,a_,carCa. 1� N`�`.. Li1 liati Ilorsh'bergo•r adj ac,ont property owner, presciated a pc-Y�.t: on1't+ti.tll 25 nautcs\in favor of,the S-R zoning, a.ncl regtiested tliut the S-R zoning remain, s,,t ating tblat development Voul t 1)c prcforable to stns thistles ivlii ch nv`�y.a.l)otxhc( oil the property, l(il) jofrclry% Route 4, Box 412-I3, Chico, now farming 20 aures, asked. that titc� xonc� revert to 5-ttci?7 parcels. I: rtttl R. Doaan'"Route 4, lox 412, Chico, wantod the S• ll to �dmaiti: on the prnporn � Jal.ilos iv+ R111M, tLa7 r Avenue, said to leave it in5-acro lots . , l,cati Eloffroll, l;oute 1, Box 760, Chico, askocl that tht coning be changed w III PlanningCom- back to ;,rS and added that; Tt xY; linpcaaatz.vc tllat t,lic Com mission ta.kc a.stand somewhorc," fclma Minn, Routo 1, Box 1"Irl), n 214-yeov resiclelit"ref alae arra, also ttil:C`d that A-5 roma iti in the area Y licit hJcCubo, ` ,in attornov with of:Cicc in, Oridley ;and Ch ic.o, represent 0 rn p, At �s Y Iaxscailiauay, SLA id. tliCat hi-:s c,l .ont had aactod ill,rt.l lanco on the Hoard i:5 action and had, trade application f&- to parcel :split dividing this p oporty into 4 parcels—all ovor 1/2 etc re in t"r1c t ttt'd that_ ;lie cvoitId rotailt her hone oil Tl�j1rcol 5 cond.hoped to dctc lop two of tht atliirr par cols with ..sln)Ic' family horles, that would he compattihlo with the Arco. llo also-:reminci'ecl th ,:C"oritt! s"s cin 011 fthc� ►itll�croft: s1i1�n'll pariols in the Loc turner—,, oil Huir, yYcqur.stod tJitit the zoiiing rovert to A-5, Mrs. Pisotlliout, !)nd 110thinl, new to Gadd, Con1111%ssioncr Bcfinott commented th'tat at trio time, of the original appl.ica- thin for ening oC this tiropoi"tv fl) at thorn i tvs a great nocct for a hul*rOr Zone Oil thO WC-St Sldo, alld tli;it' tlir approval Y,;1 Northwest Chico Rononc, li id proVidr-Nd as sti'ila along ttl,",b wost lido 'Cor' that vary purposo. Comntissionor l.amhrrt quostioned that a .,stri.li of 1-acre par&ol s is a suffi,ciont hufter between Fiber agricultural itat ds Y Nail,. on w-As macre by C;an11111'ssionat Actinott, seconded by Commirslonor Lamb crt, - Ittrr the hca,,ritip lead° hecii clasccl� to c:ontititic this Matter 1.Or decision an Vcbruary I tv,hcn oftt] l.v t.h(,ro , r, i11 bo a i:ti11, 011ims4s ioar Y !",'LLr 1, S Y mni:5iolci s 8cnnet anti Lambert and Cha:trm A 1`hcoIer, N01118 No one, AfiS11 j': Comniissioncrs Clill)or�t and ilworha,rct, kot1on cFa'rIed. .. i ct }1 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, MINUTES - Pebruary 7, 1979 A. cnNTINtIED 'ARCM ,TAMrARY 24; I'g 7 9 Closed hearing)(File (rile 79�) 1. lutte CountY Board of Supervisors -, Rezone from "S-R" (Suburhan Residential) to "A-S" (Agricul- tural - 5-acre parcel`s) property located on the 5`011th Side of Bell Road, approximately ,, 0 feet west of Alamo Avenue,. identified as �-V 42-02-13 containing '�0 acres, more or'less; Chico At the request of Acting Chairman Exorhard, Mr. Buttek°wick readcstaff T findings again. Tt was noted that the 1-tearing was closed. —' Commissioner F,ennrtt stated that he telt that it is incumbent upon this ('om),aissiort to uphold conitnattinents mado by the ,government to the citizens "referring; to tIic Roavd o1,8 61)ervi sor 5 ` approval of the original "of request) , I! and made a motion to recommend clonla.1 tho rezoning i)ropos?,1, His motion 11,q' S sOC`onded by Commissioner GLIber't: AYES : Commissioners Bennetxt, G`Llbert o LrMhert and Chairman (acting) lxerll .rd , N,Ot8 No one w ABSENT: Chairman Wheel,or �fiation car�;•ied C C , it 11 V t . y/y y FU BOARD 01, 66AO'bQ 'Ub 282 REPORT OF, DENIED REZONE - ELIZABETH V.-,EISENHOOR Report to the Board concerning Butte Country Board of Supervisors J (Elizabeth Vo Eisenhour) denied negative declaration and rezone from "S,-Wi (suburban residential) to "A-5" (agricultural - five acre parcels) property locatedon the south side of Bell Road, approximately 50 feet west of Alamo Avenue, identified as AP 42-02-131, containing 3.0 acres,,, more or leas, Chico was accepted by the. Board as informations l� ti ,J r h� • d,ARD OF SUPFRVISOP a,MIINUTES--February, 9�,9 t f i \\ Mary Ball and 'Evelyn liar, Chico. Nis., B,11.1 and Mar 't xite' ,r~ appealing the Planning Commissions denial or,a �� rezone ;from "SRN" to "A-511 for property "locat-e.d opt, the south side of Bell Road, approximately 50 feet, wast of Alamo Avenue, Chico, identified as AP 42-02-13 (Elizdbeth 'Eisenhour)Set for hearing March 139 1979 at 10;00 a.m. fi r, "; L 31 1 u r, BOgU OF aUPIM.VIA; ff ' MINTr'TBS -- Marcia, 13 , 1979 438 (c' PUBLIC HEARING: ELIZABETH V. EISENHOUR - (MARY BALL AND 81/ELYN Ml APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF A REZONE FROM "SR" (SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL) TO "A-5" (AGRICULTURAL,) PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BELL ROAD, _APPROX.. 50 FEET WEST OF ALAMO �A.�IENUE CHICO AP 42-02-i3 The public hearing on the Elizabeth V. Eisenhour (,Mary Ball' and Evelyn Mar) appeal of Planning Commission's &eni.al of a rezone from "SR" (suburban resden',tial) to "A-5" (agricultural) property, located on the south side of Bell! Road, approximately 50 feet west of Ala -mo Avenue,, Chico, AP 42-02-13 was;held as advertised. Earl Nelson, environmental; review director, set out the backg;�,und of the negative declaratl"on. This project has been before the Boal„ before. At the:1time theinrig' request was to rezone from "A-5" to ''S -R". The area iS 'three acres surrounded by different types of agricultural uses to'scattered residents. The area was zoned • "A-5" a' number' of years ago. This is the first change from that zoning. There 3.s a possibility,of this setting a precedent for other zone changes-. This property is to the west of the northwest Chico rezone. Everything along the west boundary was chang'd to one acre minimum from Cussick Avenue. He recommended a negative declaration: Discussion o;E culmative effects held at this time. Mrs K01son I -J _... stated that culmative i�ffects are to speculative at this �,'rtne. The size �_. of the environmental effects in this rezone is rulat;•!; small. fi -..,_."Bettye Blair planning director set out th bk r 9 1 e ac gound of the ro; one. The rezone- Was challenged as to the adoq' acy of the notice. The I Oa- rd's approval of the rezone from "A -5i' to "S-It�� ;zas referred beck to the Planning Commission on January 2, 1919. The Planni"ng Commission,. on he advise of Counsel in as much as the '.'s -R" has be n" accomplished, went into hearings from "S -R" back to "A-51'. The Board has copies of the :Planning Commission -minutes and findings, The Commission denied the rezona from 'rS-Ri' sol"A-5". As stated in the county general plan this is di iota den -sty residential, It is three acres more or less, 'She had plisced a map on the wall showing the existingvutes at this time: Hearing open to the public. Appearing; I. Gerald„bonds, Mr. Bonds stated that he was appearing on �~ be the zoom el "and The Metterttwriters. He read a letter in opposition 'dobeha:if of himself and several tette had been written by E4a113,n J. Carlson. Mr, Bonds stated that the property owners had had the property zoned "A-5” seVeral years agog Now this zona: has been broken down. He asked that °.ha Board change the zoning back to the A-5 zoning, He left letters with the Board. �} Jatnd'"s Owens. Mr OWers stated 'ghat the was defioien�. It was the dabisidn of Counsel to send hearing ` e shatter back r r to the planning Commission and the Bearings we a held from zoning from "8-0 tb "A-5", lie, did not feel that they were necessarily legal, ers did, nntvotto t$nning Cotnmilaionand�nstead ofhavinggoodplanning, tho0ot n�,ssionxedotnmende' d due to the fent that a protniye was tido by the Board the `�Iddi8ioft was based on a promise. Ro felt that the rezoning was going l rnm "A-5" to "S -R'', ati� to is agricultural land dir�jrtly northwest of the rezoi}�e. Rd felt that if eh., property here allowed to be in 118-R" tott�ng this w6ldobe allowing �the jum"pIng of the buffer zone in the northwerG Chi'cii re one.j1'�He felt that thi � would be creatitig shot z6hing g BOAIM oF,, wP]MVIS MINUTES ?��- march 13, 1979 `j first herd'uthevisor matter�theerezoneeaadhbeenat hen the denied.Plannipg Commission � '1 3. Bell LaPlant. Mr. Implant was against the "S=-R'6 zoning. 1 4. James Dunn. 12r. Dunn spoke against the "S-R11 zaning He was concerned that this would be the start of, "5 zoning in the area: ,:;If this happened there would not be any l,iveptiock allowed. 5 Bob Jeffrey, Mr. Jeffrey set out wig^! -'was happening to agricultuir'al land at the present time.- He as that the Board put the area in "A<5" zoning. �> 6. Mazy Ball. tis, Ball presented sevL�tf letters in opposition to the "S"V zoning. She read the letter from Evelyn Mar. She stated that she,owned 20,100 square feet of property. Whether she has one acre or one 1ftcn of land does not make any difference. She felt that the Ooard should px,4se,rve agricultural land. She telt ghat the area should be kept "AW5" 1 z/,ning. i! `. 7. Emma A. Du 'f nit. Mrs.: Dunnspru�.c against the 11S-Rt' .zoning. , 8 Lee Turn6`r.. Mr. Turner stated that Just because a person took, advantage of a small pieq of property that was for sale in the past should have, no bearing on ,the hearing, today. lie did not want the zoning broken down. 9 Neil McCabe. Mr. McCabe stattxt that he, was re resttnta.ng Elizabeth Eisenhour. 1Pi8 proposal is to go From bark to '�A•�5r',, He stated that he opposed this change in zoning. There would be a three acre parcel going back to "A-5" and is,-,-�not In conformity with the zoning. ? The board unanimously approved the "S410',. zoning last year. Mrs. EiOnhour asked acc,­arding to that zoning and fil rIti a parcel map, The parcel 1xtap is 1/2 acre parcel, .7 aore parcel; .8 acre'parcel and a .9 acre pai't,11 . She is;; committed to t�lat devplopinent o She 'paid the fees to file the tapacting on the r'S=t2'r rotting boat `the Board adopted. This also incl6des enginteting fees and attorney fens to try to maintain her position. rhe, reason this matter 's s because of a technical 1 mailed the closest ownerdw, Vor . st,mecr . The notice was ub�.ished and . is aC efore easoq the mistake was made and .;some people did not get a marled nota.ce. There was a petition sent to that; Board in December, 1978 indicating people were seeking reconsideration. It indicates the people did not gY,'to the Boa�d heating iii '�ovembor, 1978 betauso they thought the Board Wouidn't approve it, Some of them did not go to the meeting because of no notice. Many 'of the issues are ld issues There are already so many smal`f,12' 'in they area. Mr. Mccab6 slated that the Board should look closely at the map inl;reiatinn to the `'number of small parcels in the are,a. Tie Planning Commission has now votcid 4 to 0 to leP.ve the zoning as k. is "l, ;Since the matter Vas before the Board, the northwest Chico rezone has beE,h adopted. This �s f;ecogniz�t�.on that. the ,-ma1l4ot8 are there and it is not agticultkiral " . , area. Mr a Eige-6'hour is on the(ring l of the rezohe area* Old ddnuary 231 1579 the t&1'4rd dp ruVed the concept of making lot itnproVements on Shasta and Lassen Avenues. This indicates that it is developing. �r B UAItI3 Uf 6b1h1W'1rj* 1\ Mr: McCabe resented a propbs -ed exhibit 'list, Exhibit A is P�, mAP obtained from John Stutz who made a survey in the are-T`befc7ro—the matter went to the)Planning Commission the second time around. This shows the large parcel owners who are opposed to "A-5" zoning, Exhibit B is a COPY Of the Petition that was presented to the,Planning Commission in favor of retaining, the "S-R`zoning- Also included is 9 one page Petition that was not presented at the Planning,, commission level, , Therp- are 25 signatures on the original petitiap and eight signatures on tho"' additional page, Exhibit C is a color 'coded map showing the size df the parcels in the area. Exhibit D is a copy of the notice )I of this hearing. The point of thL.�,46cument--Th—ig shows that there are in the vicinity of 29 parcels within 500 feet of the Eise.nhour property. Exhibit E is a group of pictures. These are pictures taken in the are7--A-1 and A-2 are Aloha,. A-4 is the east side of Aloha B-1 to B-5 is the southwest from tell Road. B-1: is adjacent to the pr6perty- The open. area in 8-1 is a Portion of the subject property. These photos a'iq moving west still looking soutlitoest off Bell Road. ..(,-1 and C-4 go the other way back ea on Bell to Bell. and Alamo. The pictures then turnj�southj , C-2 and C-3 ate Alr on one side of the Street. C-4 is across the street. There are several mailhoXes in the -pictures C-2 and C-3. Vxhibit F is the parcel map submitted by,,,"Mrs. tisenhouri This is,,a modest Proposali The agricultural' preservationi ' !isUe isImportant. Mrs. Eisenhour"is not devoted to� agricultural purposes, ,,here is an existing home and barn. This is not a commetclal,Agrilcultural 'Piece of 1itoperty: It is not being ,,used for agriculture4 He was not aware ora drainAge Or sower problem. He asked that the,,'Ittofting be kept in "s -R11 zoning; 10. Elizabeth gi8enhour. Mrs. Eisenhotit stated that most of the People Complaining about saving agricultural !and already live on" subdivided land. R=S -Sl ll -'16 am. RECOMNE: llt25 a.m. Il. Neil McCabe, Mr. McCabe stated that Mrs. Eltenhour felt that she had acted in good faith. She felt that the tug was being, ulled out from under her. She asks that the Board coin,sider the merits of the situation and leave the zoning "'S -R" as it ib,i tier first receipt febin the county was July 26j 1978, She wanted to Point Out the language from the negative dedlaiatioft dated december 12, 1978, the toting req ested ;.s consistent with the General Plan as not Presently do8ignate& I as pteient agricultural land, 12, Tum McOtddy, Mr. McGrady stated that he had appeared before the ' Board In becember with a petition of 86 land owners in the. northwest Chico area plus a fev,names of individuals who do ftat own land. Thdsd Petitions were signed by 1ridividualg who wanted to 6e6 property west o Alamo in "A-511 toning, At the time the zoning was brought tip in 1966 tho.,rk� was muth coticottj '}lout the existence of subdivision8°and developing west of Ataftloj in patriculdr the trailer area on Aloha. That area. was sneaked, under the Wire Prior to the I'A-5" zoning, the Generat. Plan 31-8�-`now being revised. 'Ad tubthit�,ted three lettets., Mr. and 14es. Raymond Ida and,, Robert tosser and 9&r61d,)tdr9dt. Mt. 14t6tady read the lletteti from mt. �etgdt at this time: 33oam ov &wx-,EuvxAb s; 13, nina 'turner. Mrs. Turner stated that the people of the " g area spent- years and years trying to get" the�� A-5 ear �� 1 ` '► tonin for their ar Mrs knew he She presented resentedrletterstfrom: Donty was zoned Hoffreri, Jim Siemensdandied Floto changed taker. it. y Floyd ; Supervisor Dolan submitted a letter from Mabel Clark in opposition to the "S-R" zoning. Hearing closed to the public, and confined to the board. Supervitox��4inston stated that he ;should have waited on this rezoning matter until after the northwest Chico rezone had been completed. It is not very often that a person has the opportunity to correct what'he considered wrong. The Board did incur and obligation. He felt that at this point ,t1at to allow any future division.;of land Would not serve the Slfarea. The area south of Bell. Avenue was zoned "A-5". He had to agree to allow any future divisions of land in there Would abrogate the understanding that was a buffer zone in order to affect a compromise that has served erfectively to free the Chcio community. Therefore, he could not be ..' suppot'tative of the rezone of the property to ''S-R" and will oppose the effort to do so. Su ervisol� Moseleystated that sic was concerned,With agricultural l land. She realized/that it is something to look dawn the road for the future. Also, she beileved that they are maybe, using this to get: the things' they want. The government is telling us that within the next two years there will.;be new agticulturalr,land alieady to gb. Things change. She , was supportive of the "8-R" zoning.;' Supervigor 5tte �agreedolan felt wi,ththat ervisor �aland could have 'a higher price energy �� p t would break the whole zoning,�.5n the area. and ever use. �.n5ton. She f �li. that �. lil on motion of Supervisor Minston 0 seconded by Supervisor Moseley and unanimously carried; finding the proposed project could not have a significant orfect on the environment a negative declaration was adopted. 1' it wa,m -oved by Supttvisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Winston *Fhat Lhe appeal be uphp.' d and the rezone front "S-R" to "Ar-5" be approved '.Finding that it Is in conformance with the poi icy statements of the Geudral Plan and necessitates action to uphold the previous action to'uphold a burfer.� zone. 7y=Supervist�r ghaeler stated that it was time to dispel the lack of agri:dultural land. There is more land thnddr agticulture now Ito has beet predicted that 1980 will be the golden year of agri.cul.ture: The Board did make a dommittment G�Aitman Lemkd stated that it isabout time that the Board started using logidThere might 'be 1-1%2 acres to grow something on. All of tee let!ers presented and the evidence tKat has burin ptesented arel,�irom peoplR%living on parcels previously small enough to have been i.ndl,uded in ",-1t" rotting. j �. U I,I1V LOU — I,Iarch 13, ,197 I ry t Vote on motion: AYES: Supervisors Dolan and Winston NOES: Supervisors Moseley, Wheeler and Chairman Lemke Motion fails. li btk ;motioi? ,of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Wheeler 1 and carried, the property was left in the I'S zoning and not changed to \"A-5` with the finding that it is consistent with the land use element of the General Plan. AYES: Supervisors Moseley, Wheeler and Chairman ,emice. NOES: Supervisors Dola4i and Winston. a RECESS: 11:50 a.m. RECONVENE: 11:55 a-m �., REZONE REPORT ; App'`'Board of Su ervi8ors - Own or Elizabeth V. Eisenhour " Regaost Rezone from ,."SRrt to Locatioxi South side of Bell Road, approximately 50 feet west of (� Alamo Avenue, Chico Ca).lforni.a Date Action Reque8tod: January 2,-19?9 Number of Ptlrcels: Acreaqe t 0 ages, more or less • `l arming Coma ss l on FI nding, Felt teat it is incumbent upon thy. s �. Commission. to uphoi.d eommittments made by the governmenf.to the citizens �Eoard of 'Supervisors)_. —�--- _ _ Denied rezQuin ropo.�a�,i ... ..._ _ is Vote: Commiasioners Gilbert 5 Latnbort; Bermett and EverhaPcl. AYE'E', NOE, G b " A13SENT t Chairman W -feeler IES' Ax.I1 None r {{ "„✓ 1, �,. OIQ , I DREZ ONE REPORT Applicant: E1jzabgth V. F_ sen_hour _ , J Owao. ” �`UiZa t V„ E senhour & Homer-L. Gu .,fey � ": � a t o :Roqui,su. _ o h ye 'or rezon d t R�-� � I, o nS I' ( uburbi-n-Re8identJ i )y ..from OA-,511, A ri c, ltural) - ; Location Squth side of Bell ,RQad west of Alamo Rd„ Chaco Tate Action Requested: July 209 1978 ` _ �.` C1, .. a Number Of Parcels: _ One 31;:izzr n Commzw yic n Findings: Staff is atteftpt� to disc urage--&=jng Y ��Ploations that substantially are in conflict 'with .the General Plan. r. if the Commission `is.` 9 ing to follow the .plan nom an e�"r"ect.. the a recommendation of approval would be proper. _ If thg).. e. aro may or - sfot s anticipated in the ftftarec, regarding urban boundaries or ohang;,eees ri 4ensitie: then pos8.,�bly a recommendation for larger parcels, or, denial would bo^' k '� liY:lY] f 1IlITt . }itJr! Action: w Va �O ` Commisioners St,otz, Gilbert, Whe •ler and Chairman 13(-"iniaett 4 r'' AIISENT Co= seioner tverhard. f„ „ ABS All ")Noe ., 1, 0 i I if , v Tob Paulus x Div of �orestry , Agt 7 „ ,l��:�":Clx''i'E �NI 't"; ��':F;R`":Q.ar�rArom,A-S t�S �Sul�ul� I�esa�lental) _. • +1�w.{io:�;�, �, - r o-. �0 ,. r�jw,. +A..«.+.tiku..+ .r...r-r,wr. w.u-�,.w�yr m.JJ,cw..n .m....w�"1 :c r .�, ,stw._�..+-a..«,a •, .x.ra rw...+r,+.. �::u ' ..;�'aI+. r k�.._.i..A., A�..:,,.:., ,,a�.:�,.«,..w,....v> ,�mr..K;� _d .«.,.•...,....,.w «�..,w.e.;::�..r.,r .,.,.." r `f ' 1"'�i / `= "pier tie Aso.u.t n ,s •,{del 4p.IL �t�?a� .����t � Q� Ala Y t.fin _ a, „ r ,; _. w •n ......» ,.. .. �,,.,a Ei n .m-,Is Iwr. fu- f:,fis..; c,.iwrf .q,. w ,. _�; a �fC.,w. ,�... ,.w.;.n .__., _.C�41 . _ ,•.. ,. s.. .,. -... .. s ; I`) f ��) yl , A��, ss qq y� 44 Aa' Affil --I 04J w� �fI AG�'SfI ��*��+ti� �. mAli`aA� `1 Q.� �Y �c:� �C.P �Y'v�1�4.�%«1•�� �, , ," ;,.rJ .. A. .xax:,�....- ..,p,..ru,, ,, A"e.a.m..a.,.,,«w,....,µmrr,=...w.+u »..,,: •,:.+. _. ( v L , f? d� /�7! 1.,. h«wLL«xx.. waws++fuAwA:.wA,. A-+� !-. .:Qrt1 i.4wr�`Y,Wa.i4'wx4w Wn�t 74w JAJ le" .b.,.... ,µ�aLL. w. , a. , . y .. .M.. . .+ .-N.r4.,. lt.;q �. s.aW, •4 Fes.. ♦v,r.Mf W.Y 44 , a � { . ♦ w �,�,, ... -�� �� ..w"a�:v,:., .. .Jra ., w o ��. . no• r ..v�. m.a�c. a... _ .. wp�w.ex.a. .:n i t.� V ., .. c, i mr. 7COj� Lynn Vanhart` Environmental Health c RI-IQUEST Review A Comment � r RjP 140 42-02-13��.. DESCRAPTIOW`O)r PIZOJBCT Rezone from A-5 to 8-R, Suburban --,Resident 4 _ I) LOCATION,,. On"the south sine o� 13e11 Road west o;ir Alamo Ave. , Chico. APPLICANT: h`lizabeth V. .Bisenhour ADDRESS: Route 6 Box 404 Chico Ca, 95926 , ..,a.,,Nw...t.�........:,>.NN,......o..._.z_n.,�..�...t�..t,�...r.w..=:., „ 0I'm E P BOARD OF ZOUXNO* ADJUSTMENT ACTION SCHEY ULOID RE A 1J t.,.\ MI H, REQUESTED,. rwce.w.<nw .Nu..•+.u�w..w:.u........Y.•.. _.___.._•*:cwn�«...r....A,�awwxp.u..aw.w+wa.ry.r«ww+......r.rr.�.r...+.,++.',...��w^ I, DATE DISTR180M 7- 26= 78 ATTACHMBNT5 Coo- o.t l -o7 ics.tion �tP1:1n, < fr COMMEN T8 l%1 - «w�-'rt..�.. ,...—, ..w r,w�+ . - _...:_...r�:iw..."1.w•.......w.rd..4.wr,.wwwKtiwar..r++.+.r�,.�:i...as«....�a�s�.,wd`u.N.,.......t.w�::a.+...r...:. ... � \\ :•. � `y 1\. I3UI�� ��`n Pl<yrni f` AUG z, w� lr+f.li`_...L••,.-.44YwW�w�Mp�lY'rI1.Wa:ii.WwawY.+wiiAiilV.Y+�:l.�i<�.++WN.A4.iYNWX43YiW1Yr.Wbu urYYW�.4-'-v.,_. {7royille, calg0trla .N__,:..._.a}y,j,ly.w'W�A{,-,,,,,._wYm�e�ii✓ai+.,.:._.-.WriW:.+W.+N::+r+tw:.i.Ln.Y+.wIwJIiY..W'wl«lir.M'4�:`ia..�:1r+N'i.lAr':ia..LF«..1 .... •.. h:kYi� `' , It r, !j r.'ne i31 CLL •.`owitJ t`h t n��t�l� lr: hearings +vi.11. Ile IteACI on Ivedn. il5flay, C:lct obey, �, �.�7t�, ato 7 ;' 4 P �r . , a ti.�i3�f%Iiu t. el C:01Mnt;Y BclArd e P CiSj-Y � � 4 ��,r y' Re+� � Butte c��lL`.';5»�l :�t� i.1.�?!5 � ii r�?I T! {1372 59 i> i f i" � � j� fir` ��•' �p ..P., s.r•. .. roV] l: -a C�allisoki2i:-s 5 r � } �e ,,grailig elle - el burins: x"1'E1f nWWHICH NEGAMM D�ICT•1tRATIOM M +� T t.MPA '!' i:,� a .. i' !`r rpt;'► pp ► +:at t ` LlL''t:Fw +r' v: ,L✓S�iSI t} t `�, ily �" tY+�. h!% y ,. � o - tr ura �- a 1 -re pa-rae ls? n "S tit. (S� bu} bP Re N deft ',-.1 c r y da l t, ,F �lrel + w—h site, 0,i t.'l$1 . E:ea tai-gt 50 t:��t.y :,:}ifll=i i� �rzc s TaZ.'�i u. J�:�, �', �1�\, ,P, P. �...� ��O��e A�Fi Li�,.`ts �.i�,Y u �T , tai Lo'G 3 t,13ytl°"b1,.I, `li1J-rd, 7 ,ba3.'C''E4:'"on `�:E71 i'tiE t"0r E + _" in '.'•fr�i73j'�'r!tiiE � Cii2 a��r? L1°L� C�itr ► ,s p liI ¢k . stet i -060 1e t?"�. e , tis The YC o -Vo 1;`ta;IA 3 , t�ziGri � —pi, Jo r% y �r1�ot ;3� I t`T3s , Y�7o+ a.CE�Y}` MyL:�iJ�.L f'viJ+ w l�v11i�.y7• +fti++. + `' _<, i�r r s. 9,� 1 nt ,.lt,; c for ��,El'Z:ca '�il,'3'tr1;3.i1��,' Lt ��fie tf'tIrAa Car X114 13E�f i°'i� +�.`0�„"X:1: ' t S1Y�a.erR 1iE2 !` s t7f 'RL' y tuC1Lnty l"+e nto-. 1b.- le Or(' V II t'i t�^sI : ori! }i.� S� qvp-'A r.id ovint; t 3 :1 ibx?t'1f3:; a :( jJ TO -3t 4 f' " Yw f� ', N a i7 xJ'wx µ. J1�,i♦ .w ih r ar p . ri BUTTE C �Dii i Y L/'a� IN N N 1NG COMMISSION�rn IML c,MIGS �- 1 is hereby.. given b the Butte County No�a.c©: , g Y .�' � l,ax��a,l.ng Comm �.ss i+�n, Thai �ubl.ic hearyngs,,,.vil.x be hold on Wed.nesdfay, January 24,,.)19`,7:99 at,, 7 : 3►J 'p.sn; , in 4Z, ,Butt o County Board of Suxpo rvi.,ors I Ro�onl_� �-�ottE 6umt�* Adm na.stration Building, 1859 BiT4 Street, „Orovifie, C; l,i,fornia, regarding •the f6 lotivi�xg: ITEM ON 111111CH NROATIVE DEC't,ATION RBGARnfi rMUM` WI7— *1E1VDED 1.. Bii `Ce f;'auhty Board of ;Siaperuzsoi�� �zc�nc�° �xon� oi,»�t':rr , Suburban Residential' to . "� �F' Agx . ,`iiltui'al - 5 acre parc'61s) prep trty loo-ated on size s�,uul1. side of Be17. Raac.rapproxafiate3y `$0 •fcec��:'ts�st c� A3ano Avenue, i _ :? mora Particularly detatit o I ' do iti ied as AR Ali o� i1 a 3 ,f B Sui�i�£v sic per map o Ite-cord in Map B6oll� 5 em Rtge 8 - of the Butto 09unty keeor;?6r, B trdap,ting theTe�vom tho South&aste:rly 6150 5 s ,aeta,,u►ed along Ai9mo Avenue Gnn' ai-hing 3.0 aces, more or less, Chico. 2. John T,e�ttne� - Rc�ai�e from �;sS-R" (Suaburbati-Ilosidolit a.l.)',.:' 1 to 11R -P1 (Medium Density Rev.dalat:ja,l.) Property located dii tho northwest cor zer of Feat 1,10i Avonue and Lindo AVenuq,n ideAtIf ed as AP 43-0� -23, more pd�ticul d rTy A portion of Lot - 9 o� 'ihe pottrth gub4 vision ,l# " 1ohn Bitlwall Ranchoo accordi'lig to the" M t hbr€ OP 011 'rile an the office . �i of tk o Recorder ox the County of DB ttbo state of Cali olrli;,la yMOr�' �Jil,�"G�.C.I,i.� a 1,*.Y C�eSdribod at �r � f �;r"i11.�►w'� � '' t " Lt.xNriitNG at >� point iri the center t?f. TtVol<fCth l fA1fo9wo on the ,southeasterly litre 01- sa:W Lot 1oca.t.bd 245 Eoet not tbda,stcerly from ttxo N thWtst cOrtxer 6f s61a Lot „erg, an.rl runAing II , ,�.ticaxc.e at right artglrs noa•thile4u~eri.y 16.0 Herat �,MACO at right ci'n,glas southwost�'.�ly an" fi r.-j11t�S �.. fist Twol fth Avbntle 7.0 feet, thence at vight anglos northwe torly tSA9 Poet -thence,, at right a�glos a.ild pvvla l lea with %lost i�,�th Av�ewis �;orthea���terly to a pt�ilit oh the westeil.y litio 'Of iJo�st L bO,a Avewia ; thence sotltheastotly aloiag taieatcxn �. 6 ,oP West Uknao Avenuo 1.65. 5 feat n oxo K 1 or loss to n 1olmt, Saar tht souttheapterly line of .' v8ld 'Lot 40o d\ qo bo bxg the West centorline op West 12th`Pt ,,bnue 125.74 �eeu mare of lesbs to atD�nt of be"gil3� big Con`�aitr�.n�; U �+;�"�' i�GroS ► ltt1�re Or lest, Ch Q TO q; n „11 4•, A xxxxxxxxxxxxx o )� X]CXXx]CixxXxXXX l t < 7 , July 20x.,978 to � 1�aba, iF,isenh�c�ur ate ':6 hox 404 i1 dhi.co, Ca. 05926 `Ro, " Rezone AP 4,2_02r13 Uaav Ives. tisenhoux"I Thin is to notify you that we have' retexved your f application for .a 'rezone -from A.<5 to "S-R (SubUrban- Residential) for'p operty loc6t6ld 6n shut};--side o �3e'� l oa tveg°G of ,Ala.rrt�,o Av1ollde, i F1l, i iid . s ; J We Will schcc uie1)ublic aea,rinat such Limo as, the a Ci enviromitental 4eter%inri+":hen has' �ibeen're�ceiv`ed 'bJ0 this } office,,, `please fiftd end osed receij)t N6. 3p Y 7$0 for our a.p la,� cat,im fee of $21S:06. U Ml I C ' �•�W ' °jkt� it fw �7 - 1) �' J , e .� ,IG.Ir.. id' ,• � .a . ....,...e. ` a%ime.mu..9L'YJC.{M_: Y'.t..F rr 00 mpllfz VQ 1 197 79 S ili to- 5 _XZYY::'G A "�''(71��'�J t�,v OF '�� at �bu7�'�'�" u3i` l r ��yy�;s �yy pp ryry� ��yy��y+y�� x yy t�4"i`i �,��� VF1,M L.+A1'EA 1 A ���'-R11 PURSUANT 7O GHAPI.Epxrk.'.4-29. h'� JJ,od' f Sunprvivoroyf 0 } e j State of .4 .- p _y b 2 u �y i, nd " 1 'i a uax t a i Axa i o X4 2 of Vho But ;, e. Vounty :00 ORD gN 00,f0ljgy0:, t+. py �hh 5_I ubuuk,,, f,, tu V L0 M totCalif qmiaj phall be ,rind' I.t,'.,_,a. dby J/[i��lA1l.� a tid' �rt'�,4 �L idGTY'iiall s1i'io✓ppnd ih are ,1 ? , (r�?, 1. oc t-�,i'.F ,�C +, '%;his;' w " iii ':V..G r l,iJ ] old 2'C:�w i ' r�"�`r '. � 1a <'� lC ij wi».7':c,n,.,i.1 a.Tkl4ep'dx1d pro Wed.` 9 r4 i': d: n:i'4,c,1; .-e ,,i�imd W! IC�C'�,�to !Au�t�C�J ` Is 10 m'- Wrs,���, �'�,�. �� �tl %,�..�. �tw 'r,.'r.". _� 1-�.'.,« '.. '�;�.i✓..��'..I�,c ��.a.1,.�.4tilF�,.r" __ . l� qqJ i1 113 141 ""No Al . W4OW r r�.�• 1 r� l,rk�� c N.,12, �f rryyr_i � U� �1 L4 1; ,Lon naiad t ne u y -J .. - r . • Ay� Apgw "rtp M Gly bMa� pevb&m r 'l 'd uses, y o. ,..• d-,;7 �k1.11',CS.4V V>4Js.L's..l.[Lfi. ,! U•iyd,r)�,.'S ,,L,.r ri,c'. a'��.v d�+t .J,�':o.+..a' e.'.. g,"�i �.�.'.� ��,q�i e 190 T.L1,1:,1 ''18s: 20 1, ExG`li1.s1"1 e of ME' ;G`ua 'PrV.LtluC;'l uv who r.NplG4uno4mi 91 thj�,p �,,�1n�`��'7�{w g �j h op pwicb! ��,�°�r�� „x.:11 to vl oq ifled d$t' }a WJ...L N'4+«LlA �J..1✓� V Y I �„jnch Fa l.i •kM�. C?t i4bitioW �,�sL �}}:� � i," Uiu�.yFiuiFEil'alwa ��,.,{t \ !1 a* VON inch, Mae or hood of �tktulu pvav P,J4 of ; ; 3 +�, #��' S �+w �S+:: i, \ 0 4�� •' , � I� }ter � `^ .. ij%'b Por eiA hoid of swine : over torn iefjkd of, age* ane ae re c For each head of r.Shee ql cuts, one acre 4 4for the first head en&(� ne hwlt (ijz) 'aca�,a br each heady thereaficT 6. ,(C) THE, OLLOWING ATSES SUHSBCT TO SECURING AA USE PERMIT 7 4� 4 EACH CASK, > 8 , 'I Pub3o and u►si� ubl.i.r w:3es{,, including ' Q P ehurh�s, hospitals, parks and playgrounds', sehoois anti'1 publ 10 ff utitity bukidings Il `(x _ (,��..The provisions of-See t;seal l apply ; ,r7 12' 58CTION 3. All uses of land .'wi.thin the district 'not . L3 s ecifi.cala y authors zed °afld, permuted twe prohibited. 14 SECTION +!: In cpmpAianee ' th 'the proVisions of said: 15 lutte "Cow ty Code, Chapter 24, the same . s hereby amended by le adding thi'i Ordinance„ in full 1, I SBCTIOId " The penalt,6s for the "voii�'tc�n 'of the lid z®ning hereby impo.40d, Vithiu the district shall be as proVid'od in 4 lg the�Atte .Count Gude Chapter '240 this Ordinance shall frown ari l y , 20Aate after' its e�feetive become h supplement to send part of than 9,1 lr_ Butte County Co do 6 Gha,��tdx 24. 22 8I3CTit?N CThis Ordinance shall bb and itI hibreb.y $3 dada-rod o be° in full force ahA offect from and atterr, thirty., (30) 2�4 w r ria s after, the date Of itq 'sass e, y p g 'an Defoice the e*Airati.on of 2 fii'teen` (is) dl :ys after its 'Passage,. this, Urdintnee sha'ii be ti�,,pu'bli.shbd a'nee'`with,6 ,i4mes of the memf+ers r tho Doazd of Ito 60 a ' � o r• "i D G r 14 A T ll R :4 L fir !; A, I, Y F? A i` 11 D BEAUTY �( Sep't;embe 1 �Tg,a� � ENVl�lCINMENTAL REVIEW DEPARTMENT EARL O,'NELSON; Dirsetor s° Elizabeth V. Eisenhour. Route b, Box 4.04 C Chico Calif orilia 95926 , wg RlanninCommission Hearing " P • P T The ,Butt'e Co'unt7- zronmental. Review 'DeparL-ment has conilpleted the , conriectt.orment l tplease lleea�a sr� �e i,o3 with find a cop y of t Ze Envir;onmekital Checkl i. 3t - a or',t (App eiadLt "F } » (J This study will he reviewed fey the appropx:;,� ate_�nearing 'board and considered for adoption y., Please review the enclosed checklist, noting particula��rly any en- ;vironmental problems ti;hich could be �.i.nsmized or avoided. by the Ga�^e arid. manner in which the project is cavFied. out. Also; please review a y recommended, mitigation._ measures or coeds tions of approval, After reviewing the checkl.s.st, you mav: -;.,ee ways to improve the pro- . Iect densn. emPoo��, problems are cra. m1ssionsLn orevgluatibnple6sPbring If you uoe aayer errors , them to our attention. .A. public hearing to consider thre checklist'; adoption 6f a negative declaration,,:, and project approval will: be held before the -Butte County Plane n Commission on Wednesday,. October 4 1 �8.at : 0 _ _ strati on Etiil.din Bird trei Boax'd Room, Admits Orovs_lJ.,e. ,_, all interested persons are welcome to attend and be heard:. \t if yaU, have any questions concerning tbi's matter, please contact this office 1, i er' truly yours 1 Earl. b Nelson] Environmental �evi�w �a.:-:rector ;r enclosure li $$achman thgineering 7utty Cornet Orive Oedville, tali%t»ia 959us ralephahe t9 it) 534.077