HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT. 79-35 1Receipt�
Pro j ect Il
APPENDIX t;
Date 'Filed 14)//P,.�!
Environmental: Information Form
('zoo be completed by applicant)
GENERAL 'INVOR.MATION
1. Nave and address of developer or project sponsor,, / +1
I'
2 Address of project~ a1 U i� S
'
Assessor s Block and Lot Number
C
3. Name, address, and telepnumber of ersn to be contacted
conc rnin�; phis pi qj ect ; '�'
4. Type of project: (i. e. rezoning, subdivision)
—C _
5. List and des cribe any other related permits and other public
approvals required for this project, including those required by
city, regional, state and federal agencies i •a�r..rr -r
6. Existing zoning district;
7. -' Proposed use of site:,f f
PROJECT DESCT xtpy I
8. Site size 63
9, Square footage of building(s) 41?
10: Number, of floors of construction.
11. Amount of off-street .park np, provi.ded.X///� l
12. Attach site deveiopment plan.
'13. Proposed scheduling.
Environmental Rovlew Dept,
14. Associated projects. IW
4-
0 CT 19 1978
15. Anticipated incremental development.
Buit�f" ,CowAy,
Buff CO, cilar�nr�c� Comma.
Orouille, "Call orni4'
A.pperidi-A E page 1 of 3
APPENDIX EAgh
16: ijs residential, include the. number of units, 8017edule df unit
sig est and- type of hou.selold size expected.
17 if commercial, indicate the type, whether ne ghborlood; city
or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading;
faiAlities
I$. 1:f industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift,
andloading; facilities."
1If institutional, ind,icate themajor `Tttiction, estimated
9.
employment „per shift est T' aced occupancy, loading facilities
and community be�'efits to 1 derived fromthe project.
20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use'or rezoning
application, state t1� s and indicate clearly why thP" application is
required,pp�ly—
�4.L.ZY,". 1s.,,:ry .. `/i{, (►. %r Gs rif i",G 1� /!> G T�•» di . uy ,�C: � Cd'/^ P G+i�., /'� �,; „�...L, 1 '
Are the following j}tems applicable to the project or its effects?
Discuss .below all items chL-cke,d \\yes (attach additional sheets as
necessary).
XNSNO.
21, Chane in existing features of an beaches, lakes
Change Y ,
or hills, or substantial alteration ;of ground contours.
r 22, Significant change iii scenic views or vistas from
existing ,`-:residential area.s� or public lands or roads,
23. SIgnificant,l.y change pattern, scale or character, of
general area of'project,
✓ 24. Significant 'amounts of," solid waste or li11��ter'r,
x `25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odd'--s in
vicinity;
.6. Significant change in lake, stream or ;round, water
quality or quantity, or alteration" of exist'
ng d-ainage
patterns t.r
27. Substantial change in oxi,stinc,.�no se or vibration
lavers in 'the vicinity.
23. Site on filled land or on slope' of 30 percent or more;
29. Use or disposal, of, potentially hazardous materia]`$;,
such as toxic _ substances, flamma.bles or explosives.
E,
1
Appendix F page 21 of 3
APPENDIX F
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM':
(To be completed by Lead Agency) r,
Z, BACKGROUND Log"# 78-10-19-03
1. Name of Proponent HenryJ. Martin Sr.
2. Address and Phone Number ot Proponent:
196 Conners Avenue
Ica, a ifar95926
3. Date of Checklist Submitted _
4. Agency Requiring Checklist
5. ,Name of Proposal �.f a lica'6
, pp e Rezone -from A 2.-, to
SR -1
on AP# 47-25-131, north, of Chi'co... �J
it, NIRONMENTALIMPACTS
{{ es
of"y " and "maybe", ansvors are required
or
attached sheets.)
'SES MAYBE
NO
1. �8ar.th, Will the proposal result in significant-
ign f,icant —
't'
a. Unstable earth conditions or in ���
changes in geologic substructures
b, Disruptions, displacements, com-
pacLion or overcover,ing of the sod 1?,.
c. Change in topography or ground sur-
face relief features or removal o£
topsoil?
d. Destruction, covering or modifica-
tion of any unique geologic or
physical,feature.s?
e. Increase in wind or water erosion
of soils, either on or off the site? F '"
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of'' 'beach sands," or changes in silta-
tion, deposition, or ;erosion whioh
may modify the channel of a river or
stream or the bed of the ocean,or,
any bay, inlet or Lake?
g. Loss of prime agriculturally pro-
ductive soils outside designated
urban areas?
! endx F a e 1 'af..
App - p g,
9 '
,
VES M, IBE
a,
NOcc
h,.
Exposure of people ,:or. property to
geologic ,,hazards such as earthquakes,
landslides, mudslides, ground fail'ure�,
or similar hazards? o
,
2 Air:> Wil 1 the proposal resul in;
a.
0
Substantial deterioration of
ambient or loca air gexality?
` b.
The creat- Gin. of objectionable
o dors , d sri�zke or fumes?
,.
C.
Significant alteration. of air
movement, moisture or tempature,
or any change in climate, either
focally or regionally?
3, Water. Will, the proposal result in substantial;
a.
Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements?,,
40
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage
ra
patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface rater runoff?
c.
Need for off-site surface drainage
i
improvements, including vegetation
l
removal,, chanheLI nation or culvert
installation?
d,
Alter„ -ions ons to thAourse or flow
flood D
of waters?
e.
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
f.
Discharge ,into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface
water' quality,, iritluding but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or ,turbidity?
AIL
WL
g.
Alteration of the direction or
rate of+' flow of ground waters?
h.
Change it the quantity or quality
of ground waters , either.• through
direct additions or wa:ti dra va.Ls
or through interception of an '
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
,,
"°
Knnendix 1~ page 2
of 9 ��
i'.
s'
YES MAYBtt
NO
.
Reduction in the amount„ of water
otherwise available for publ`ic�\,
Ah
water supplies?
Exposure of people or proper.
to water relatedhazards,° such as
f lo`Oding?
proposal result r'p
4 Life . Will. he
a�n
su stantial s
a.
Loss of vegetation !;5r change in, the
diversity of species or number
�
of any species of plart:;s (including
(1
trees, shrubs, grass, crops)'
mjxr,oflora and aquatic plants)
b.
Reduction of the numbers of any
i
un�.que, rare or endangered species
• .
of plants'?
--
-Q
c.
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or ,in a barrier
to the normal replenishment of
existing species'?
qW
d.
Reduction in acreage of)any agTi-
-
cultuzal crop?
5, Animal hife.'.Will the proposal result `
in
substantial;
a.
"Change it the diversity Of species,
ornp;mbers of any species of
an (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell-
hellfish,
fish,benthic organisms,,, insects or
micro fauna) ?,
b,
Redu:ction of the numbers of any
,unique, rare, or endangered species
AIL
of animals?
p
C.
lntr�duction of -new species of
an,?Amals into an area, or result in
a'bai;rier to the migration or
movement of anim ls2
d.
Reduction of- encroachment upon, or
deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife, 'hab . it?`
Appendix E
- page 3 of 9
q
YES
IA&YBE N® _
l tn.ep result in
]o .se: W'il.l proposal
J 1° ;O b;stant :al --
r
';• _-
Increases in noise lei- els
Exposure of people to 'severe noise
level,;?
---"
it it .J
7. Light and Clare. Will the proposal
light or glare?
pro Kc gnicant
--
1 $, Land Use. Will ',the proposed result
.
,
is innifioant ;
a Alteration of the planned land use
a trend
OF
of an area, or establish
whicta, w11 demonstrabi-y 7 ead to such
alteration?
b COI?i: __ .- with uses on add oining
"77c
.>
properties, or conflict with
educa=
establiched recreational,
:> tjonal, religions b SClentific
;{
uses of an area?
ces. Will the proposal
Natural Resource
9. u
r� �.�._
resuL .insubstantialt
a. Demanda,for, or increase in the rate'
resources?
�.
of use of any natural.
l
b,- Depletion of any nonrenewable
ra ounce?
natul res
l s - ro osal.
„ 10: Risk of U s;et. Does the p ,p
of an explosion orl �
x o ve a risk
the tel of hazardous substances
to, oil,
(includi.ng, but not limited
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
, set
in the event of ' an accident -orr.,up
conditions?
ll; population. Will the proposal
alter the location,
s ;nil .cantly
distribution, density, or grqwth
an
rate of the human population of
^
area, or physically divide an
established, community?
12, Housin ,Will the proposal
affect existing housing,
siSnIri y
or create a demand for additional
housing? ��
I
a 4 ,`
Apperidix-2 page 4, of, 9
♦ ,
7 r
:_0
yS MAYBE
NO''
13,
Trans ortAti.on/Circul&t'i6n `. "infill the
proposal resu int,
a: Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
b. Significant effects on existing
parking facilities, or demand for
new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
d. Significant alterations to present
,
patterns of ;izculation or movement
AMh
of people and/ -or goods?
;
e. Alterations .t 6, Waterborne, rail. or,
traffic?
f. increase in traffic hazards to motor
'
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
14.
Public Services . Will the proposal --have
an e7fect upon, or result in a substantial
need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
I
a. F'ire protection?
_
b . P'olice protect fon?
`�-
C. Schools?
d: Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance u£ public facilities,
including roads?
f. Other governmental. services?
15.
Energy. Will the 'proposal result in:
;
a. Use of substantial,,.,amounts of fuel
or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy, or
require the development'., of new
sources,,of energy?
16.
utilities. Will the proposal result
na nee or new systems, or sub-
stantial ralte'rations to the following
_uti'l.ties
Appendix V
- page- 5 of. 9
YES MAYBE ., NO
a, Power o r natural gas 7
b, 'Communication/3 systems?
Ah
c. Watery
(will
d, Sewer (1l trunk line be, extended,
pru°viding caparity to serve new
development)
e. Storm water drainage?
17.
Human Health. Will the proposal
result in: J
a. Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health).
b. Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
18.
Solid Waste, Will the proposal result
in any significant impacts associated
with solid waste clisnosal or litter
-
contro L?
19,
Aesthetics, Will the proposal result
in th—e o struction of any ptiblic
designated or recognized scenic vista
open to the public, ,or will the
proposal result in the 'ereation of an
aesthetically offensive site open-to
public view?
20,
Recreation., Will the proposal , result
in an impact ,upon the quality or
gUGLn:tityof existing public., recrea-
tion facilities?
21,
Archeolo ical./Historical, Wi'11' the
proposal result in an a teration of
a signif icant archeological or
historical sate, structure, object
or building?
22,
Mandatory liin�';Ln.gs of Significance,
a. Does.the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
,w the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
h
I
. Appendix' F P-ae 6 of 9 ;
YE. S MAYBE_
NO
sustaining levels threaten to.
eliminate a plant or animal com-
munity, reduce the number of restrict
the range of a rare or endangered
,
plant or animal or eliminate important
A
,,examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short term benefits to
the detriment,,, ofpublicly adopted
r' long-term environmental goals?
AML
c. Does the project have impacts which
are indiv dual.l"y limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (a project
may impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on,each
resource is relativel small, but
where the effect of t e total of
those impacts ori the environment is
significant,)
d. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial;
adverse effects on human,'beings,
either directly ov i.ndirectlr?
_1
Appendix F_-',Page
7 of 0
J
III. DISCUSSION OV ENVIAONMENTAt EVALUATIOAI
r
This project is a rezone from A-2 (General)„ to SR-1 (Suburban
Residential, 1 acre minimum lot size) for AP 47-25-131, north of
Chico. The 8 acre site is located on the west 'side of Hicks,Lane
about 3/8 mile south of Keefer Road. The land is presently open-,
grassland with no structures. Most of the property slopes gently
p on'the ea,s tern portion
to the east toward a small ephemeral creek on
of the site. Though the total site is th a"Xcess of 10' acres in
size, only about 8 acres are available for residential uses. A
portion of the Clear zone for the Chico,Munic'ipal,Airport covers
1.92 acres on the eastern part of the site.,
Soils in,this,area are mainly Anita clay loam along with some Vina
loam (stony phase) and Tuscan stony clay, loam. These soils, as a
Whole, are hot con idered good for agricultural purposes other than
grazing livestock on the grasslands which flourish.
Characteristic wildlife in this area include rabbit, skunk"; gopher,
,various rodents, lizards, swat 1 ows,, blackbird„ hawk, owl, vu'l tore,
sparrow and crow:
The 8utte County General Plan designation for this area i,s grazing
open land, 1 to 5 acres per dwelling unit. The land to the west and
south- is open grassland with no strictures. A si„ngle family resin
Bence lies across Hicks Lane to the northeast. Lane to the north is
grazing-open land with scattered residential uses especially slang
Keefer Road and Rock Creek.
According to the "Chico Municipal Noise Study"' (1977) conducted by
R. Dixon Speas & Associates, the project ,site falls within the 55-60 „
Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL);
E _ The Advisory Agency approved a tentative ve 'parcel map for thisproperty
to create four parcels (two 1 acre parcels and two parcels of about
3 acres) on October 2, 1978 A Negative, Declaration regarding environ-
mental impact was adopted as para of the parcel map approval.
1,(b),: Dis'ruptions displacements, compaction and ove)^covering of
p
the 5011 would occur from the development o
fu P to,eight
on the total acreage.
3(b)s There would be a slight increase in the rate and amount of
s'tormwater runoff e'nte'ring the creek as a;recult of this rezone and
subsequent land divisions that could occur.
Appendix F page 8 of 9
5(c)t The SR -1 zone Would allow livestock to be ,raised or kept on
the premises subject to lot area requirements. Horses, cattle, 1.
swine, sheep a'nd/or goats can be kept if sufficient lot is available
in addition to the 1 acre minimum lot area required for residential
" 6(6) Typical flight paths bring aircraft directly over the site
on some approaches, often at low altitude. This is particularly true
jwith small aircraft using the airport, It is recommended that houses
constructed on the property be insulated to attenuate aircraft noises.
11: There would be some population growth potential as a result of
the rezone to SR -1. The proposed SR -1 zone would allow up to four
additional parcels to be created on the property. Actually, due to
the zoning requirement that newly created parcels in the SR1 zone
be 1 acme 'in size exclusive of rights -of< -ways three parcels is, prob
ably a mere reasonable figure as a maximum.
.The Generl P, an designation of grazing -open land, 1 to 5 acres per
dwelling u0,t;4 for this area would be in confbrman';e with this zoning
proposal, rrie surrounding land uses are a blend of rural residen
tial -and agricultural (mostly grazing) land uses. The Planning
Commission is currently studying a rural residential designation
for this area as part of a General 'Plan revision;.
16(d): Due to limitations of the soils, parcels of one acre or
anger are usually needed for sewage disposal purposes in this area.
Seepage pits are often used in shallow soil areas, such as occur in
this 'locality, due to the lack of adequate soils for,conventional
leachfields,
o ,
r
Appendi X F page 8a of g
a;
ofta,
'
4
,
•�, ?
r V , W
Henxy #!4 Martin Sp «
Dea:v Mrl, Mart: x a
7
$ r� � G of �,h64 BoArd Q rid erg"a.9.fJ 9 . F c. +]cq 1 Of TJ
to', id -of
Y~ '
eucia6ed 'i's A,General 016im farm If OP YoUr'. signatur PLe,a��
>�
and returri,to ;the Vlarini.'n bepartmeiAt,,, '? C4unt� Cent
.Dj Vey Crovi:iie' al C)rala
d
s
l
Ifql� hive ani further qu`ea .one, ' fee7- "e tb Gan Ob
:.
..
'this office,,
irs ere.' 9
r i
i�xaetox
�
BB 2 Si;int
lc1:0SLi
C,,
. Earl ��
cc
Y ''V
Ch i✓!%f�%
rte,
lY- .d ��.T
x
'r
�
I ,
i Y� i t �
4a
1✓rk
J) Is
Y
d) P ) YM yz-1...,rY„ff�i
(i
'• d '
�.; ,�V
f{ r �
4 4 ,, Y �, 1'*f � �N 1 �, 4 � -0� ,
� C!a ll
Pla.; �
,�
� {i,. 'Y
+ <S
., id ��, i 'I "trJ yrs+ J• P
77,
ifi T R ri" 11 ✓F ,�.. �k7 ,„• 1'dit •, Tul l'Fi ”! i �A 'i �i! "�'P h5 T ly I nK f TY FyX sA,N l 9",� f �.1'. Y r .�
JI a'
h
It L
�
�_ z;. �: r,d-'. �. '.: . _`.: o •, �.. -i
,err
@Xl martin;, sr. I
,1
16rC e Avenue'. l)
Chico, Ok"I rx a95990,A
r�
p a
n l
u
Dear. Nlrlsazi:
Ag a, 11asult,bf b cz oat' � cif SUP 63 vVi4Qrs action of' y Jbecoilb t -
IP s 1918 t, a io i -4g lou to 'receive y0i1r, mit=d of lees ' )a"
closed ,ic a General �Uim forte fax yo�xr s.ignattkire.' J)i 'as
J.
sisn on both, f arms ''end` Veturrt both t4, ,,�tb;e ).,,nV, r6=en 6&i, �.Review
Departxne at 1. -183 .Pfl County Cent r. ,.1�r ve, Oroy7.�.1. Cs . ,forna.aa
,
Tr.� /'�i�, �y �}y� •�{y ^�+ j%�y� .j�y�y y $�y.��} ��•y a �y ,�j /� /� y.(ry` �y
,.
lQgi YVGi,.r lG.�i��.�N.u�. �0_� 1rlV� ei. 11u1:7,,� Vn 4Y� J.,�QN •tV ��A"
��iyy..��I,
/Vyy
Pi1Zjl 'o ental, R,0��%WeW DiVeCtQr Fi 1
?SDN s c1p. �K
Cl
A
�
,. uh
e '.�p � ¢ r. a �y� y Fre _ 1: ,•e ,'�. .>�
�;.
.�. )`
Sirinfrii..cowrtaosmea
��� :, .� I t I a
�
imu.e�ia '..�...eJ::F.iF7tSH'�.! c"i: 4
i e�