HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT. 79-41'
L
' }:'
� � � • 1.
�
F
f �
�t, �• ` 11,
t.
�
�
� p.P. •
'l
At
t
a
t
I^
J
.t
I �.
1
6
A pf
. 5 r
�
��t
1
r + � , 1
•; • °p•
-, •tl
1
A
�
�Ir
g
h
''I
, M-,.
Y+r�,
CCC
,� .
�I
j
y ',i 'f J' C •
t '
i
\'
B,�UTTE COUNTY plr;INN NG COMMISSION
MINUTES September 6, 197
i
A-2 IZONINO. D1 TRICTS
AfterTeva.ewi'ng a inpmorandum'' fx`i'am J3ett3re
B?.air, dated September 6y1.
�
1978, staff was a.n;stlxuct'ed to xescheaule
this matter for October 4.
40
C:
\, !
U' TB COTINT PLANNING COMhiiSSION
P 1 t!TS c.Octobar 4 1978
r:
F, A-2 ZONING pISTRIC`i"SD - Interim: Zoning Proposal
}
79-27-2-246
rAr.s, flair, .using a `colored map harked "Exhib t A-2 7ZP", outlined
the proposal she plans to make to the Board of Supervisors regarding
these A-2 Zoning Districts.
No formal action was t.,Aen, b!at agreement toas indicated..
Inter-Departmental Memorodum
To; Planning Commission
FROM; Bettye Blair, Interim Planning Director
SUOJECT: A-2 Zoning Districts
it
u
nnYr: September 6, 1978
The Board of Supervisors; on the 29th of August, 197$0 on a 3-2 motion,
decided that no further parceling or subdivisions would, be allowed in the
A-2 zone unless the zoning is consistent with the County General Plan.
Staff was surprised at this action on the part of the Hoard, inasmuch as
approximately 1/3 of the County is within the A-Z (General zoning distxict..
The parcel maps and subdivisions that have been processed in thisunclassi
lied zone have been required to meet the minimum parcel size requirements
as set forth in the General Plan, i.e., open Grazing '15 acres per dwelling
'unit, Low Density.,_R4si.denti;al 1-4 dwelling units per acre, etc. but the
subsequent land use that is established is often in conflict with the Genea.l
Phan.
As you know, the A-2 zone allows the full range of land use without
additional review. The Board's action was to control the land use not
the minimum parcel, size, inasmuch as, currently, proposed divisions of
property meet the General flan minimum parcel size requiremen.°ts4
in light of the Board's action, staff recommends the Commission consider
y the initiation of zoning, bringing the A-2 (General), unclassified;,, areas
into conformity with the General, Plan as quickly as possible. Staff
believes the general public should not have to bear the burden of fe68 and
time in having to 'make individual applications on zoning prior to their
proposed subdivisions of property. The piecemeal effect that would rr,?"ult
from this particular type of action could be detrimental to long-rang, land
use planning.. It is the Commissions responsibility to make the long-term
land development policy recommendations to the Board of Supervisors.
The Commission may want to consider, initially, a recommendation to the
Board of interim zoning which would reflect the General Plan densities and
goals, as a method of eliminating the unnecessary delays for the general
public.This would also provide that new land uses being established would
not conflict with; the long range planning.
Should the Commission feel that the time involved in accomplishing specific
zoning would be excessive and create undue delays, then, perhaps the
Commission should recommend that private consultants be retained.
Staff believes, at this timer that. sufficient information is available
regarding existing land use to enable the staff to prepare recommendations
for the Planning Commission in the very near future.
BB/hd
011
n --Residents of xc�a�a, Road
an4 .ad oining rea ,
n
Biggs California, 95917
Butte County Planning Commios ipn
7 County Center Drive.
Oroville, California 9596
September 30, 197$
Dear Sirs,
Vie the undersigned petition to have the zoning n
our area comply with a.,, general plan vhich supports orchard
and field, crops, and insures a, five sitcro minimum for n(vV }'
lots., �4
OWNER ASSESSOR P ARCEs 1�#t�" : �� 8),
'013
k 09
41,1.E
am
•
Aliz.
lei
r J
/v u