Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT. 79-38 11 f ,� , ,..�� '�• ry i._ 4. � ^ AAA 1 'D r ` ' ,._� �� � y :ji+ it %�t;� f -:n Jt�I``r ���• ,. ' •q r 7 I� '' �. _ ,�9�� � Sit - `+ t •; / e . rr � r , � ��i •; t y. { 17 �t �P• rjir ) ) ►tit ���,�,h•' . �` ` � r � �r'. ) �`•/ Irr�� P � 4 1 "I APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE a 2. iPd� #78-i82 Lr- CHNER Butte County Planning Commission ,t } File No. c� } N tote filed Hearing date Action by Planning Commission Action by Board of Supervisors yi PIZESC= -�l 7�ONING: SR Assessor Map Boolt Page No. 03 Parcel No. ,w _ _23 REQUEST- R-3 APPLICANT'S NAME: JOHN LECHNER <_ _v 3 43-4268 �� HONE: �..:. ,... ADDRESS: 352 Vallombr s o a STATUS OR"APPLICANTS INTEREST IN,-PROPERTY: _Owner „ OWNER'$ NAME, Same _ PMONE: ' r ADDRESS.. r;„ •, _...;_-_.��� DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Existing urban city 7 of with two existing 1—bedroom residences, orie to be removed ane r 11 ye EXPLAIN F CLY REASON FORl APPLICATION: To allow construction of a dup7ek. I note that there are other SR axeas in,:,the immediate SUrrouhdincr 11 ii fo Co, Planning Oon7Mn C �' 5 1978 The above sfaternents are certified by the undersigned' fo be correc+, OrovilleCatifornla AA 11_ Sl nn J . ~ I,ECHNER 9 n ature of applicant NOTE: Please submit herewith a check or money order in the amount shown below.., payable, to Count of Butfe' a 3,6"a detailed y I plot plan showing the location of existing and proposed structures on your prop''ertyana on the adjacent i�\ properties;. By Receipt No. %iRAa�nceax'A• i�— AlIR7R�in�aewac` :.: ansa ,. assn. . _ . _, s APPtNDIX E tip, �si 1"6. If residential, include the number a� units, sched��J.e a� unit Sizes, and type of household size expected. 17. >:f commercial`s indicate the type, whether nein �,hbor.,h0Q.cl, city _or regi-ona7ly , oriented, squaxe,...footage of sa facilities les area, and loading 18• If indus�rial`,,indicate type, estimated employment andloading facilities. p ymenL per shift, 19. 1f institutional, indicate em l o the major function, e8timated, d ,ymei,t per shift, estimated occupancy, loading fac;i.lities, axil community benefits to be derived; fromthe project. 20, if the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoinin application, state this and indicate clearly why the a,(�plication is required. Arne the following items applicable to the project=ciits effects? Discuss below all items checked, yes (aL-tac;h additionalr sheets as :,.. npicessary) , YES No, 21 G.haz go in exi.sti.i �� featu.res of any beaches, lakes , or hills, or substantial ?' teratiOn Of "& ound contours X 22. Si ni.l'icant change in conic existing residential ureas o publilows ar Vistas from X c lands or roach's , 23. Significantly change na tern, scale or character of. general area of Project. ' X 2lit Significant amounts of solid waste or litter, X 25. Change in dint, ash, smoke, fume's or odors in vicinity, 1 X 26. Significant' change.in lake, stream or Around wager quality or quantity, or alteration 'of exis patterns tw'ing drainage X 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity, X Site on filled land or on slope of 30 percent or more. X 29. Use or disposali, of potentially hazardous materials, such as t(ikic substances, flammables Or explosives. `, APperidiX F pa€;e 2' of 3 !J l s YES X 30 . �i-,,,W to tial change in demand for municipal services (po ice, fire, water, sedWage, etc.) . X 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).r X 32. Relationship to part of a larger project,-,or series of projects. ENVIRONMENTAL ;SETTING, 33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. 0 scribe any existing structures on the sate, and the use 'of the structures 34. Describe the surrounding, properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.) , intensity of land use (one-Mara ly, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height,- frontage, set-back,, rear yard, etc.) CERTIFIcATIONz T hereby certify that the statements furnished above and zU the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ab;i.lity, and that the facts,; statements, and information presented are true and corract to the best of my knowledge and belief. October 1.9, 1.978 , DateOctod �-Signature_ N LECHNER', dor r). 19 Comnyl OCT 197$ Oro Vigo, Cali�ornl� Appendix E - page 3 of -3 478-l82/LECHNEIt j ;) U APPENDIX F ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) .i1 x: 'BACKGROUND LOS 78.10-2� -02 1. Name of Proponent Sohn Lechner 2. Address and Phone Num er of Froponer,,,.t ; -~ 3 '2 Vall.ombrosa Avenue c o C. W Bac an hm . �_" � ,Chico, California 9592.6 Bac�ima ` r C a es 3012; 'The Es L`an n P, Chico, Cal:�iorn2, 3: Date of C hecklist Submitted 4. Agency g y Requiring Checklist 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Rezone Txom 0 to 'allow,_ construction of a .duplex, 43 II. ENVIRONMENTAL IN9PACT5 ' (Explanations of all yes wand maybe answers are required on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE No ; ] . Earth. Will the proposal result in significant Unstable, earth 'conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, com- <+ paction or overcovering of the soil?, C . Change in topography or ground sur face relief features or removal of ' topsoil? j d: Destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? ,= e. Increase iqwind or water erosion of soils, either on ;or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion' 1� of beach sands, or changes in silta- titin, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a„ river or stream or the b-ed of the ocean or any bay, inset oi: lake? ;, g: Loss of prime agriculturally pro- ductive soils outside designated urban areas' i, A end%x "F Pp page 1 of ___` r' YU MAYBE NO , h, Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in a. Substantial deterioration of ambient ox local air quality? b. The creation of objectionable oke or fumes? c. Significant alteration of, aid movement, moisture or temp'ature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3 , Mater i' '' Wi.11 the proposal result in substantial , n- a Changes in currents, or the course? p or directIon,of water movements? b. Chariges in absorption rates, drainage ' patterns," or'the rate and amount of surface water runoff?° c. Need- for off-site surface drainage improvements, including vegetation removal channeli�ata.on or , `z culvert installation.- d, Alterations to the course or flow I IL of flood waters? e; Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? .ry h. 'Change in the quantity or quality of ground water s,,either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? A�spenda.x F page 2 of 9 YES MAYBE NO 1 i, Reductiont� in the amount of wat'er otherwise available for public water supplies. j Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? Plant';Life, , Life. Will the :proposal result in suitantial: a. (s/ 1 boss of vegetation or change iri the diversity of species or number of any species of pl.arts (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? B! =... b. Reduction of the number$ of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of ff existing species? d, Reduction i_n acreage of any agri,- cultural crop? 5. Animal_ Life'. Will the proposal result'. in subitantial: a. Change in the diversity ofspecies, i1 or numbers of any species of i` animals (birds, landanimals �r including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthic orfanisms, insects or microfauna)'? b . Reduction of tete numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of 'an ima l,s ? c.' Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to; the migratinn or movement- of animals? d, keduction of, enrroachme;it upon, or deterioration to existing fish or , wildlife habitat? pit„ Appendix F p.age 3 of 9 YES MAYBE Np 6, Noise, Will the proposal result n��, substantiAl a,Increases in noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise "levels? 7 ' Light and Glare W `0111 the proposal Prouca esignicant light or glare? 8. Land Use, Will the proposed result in a signif icant 11, a. Alteration of the planned land u.se of anarea, or establish a trend -which. will demonstrably lead to such- alteration? b. Conflict` with uses on - adjoining properties, or conflict with established"recreational:, educa-. " tional, religious or scientific. uses of an area?,. 9. Natural Resources. Will theo al p` p yos , resu t in substantial; a. Demand,for, or;increase in the 'ate U, Qf use of any natural resources? b, nep,lo-tion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 110, Risk of Upset, Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, j pesticides, chemicals; or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. Population. Will t"he proposal signi� cantly ;aiter, the 'locati.on, distribution, density', or growth rate of the human popular -,ion of an area,or physically divide an established community? �12.Hou���sing Will the p ,)sal sign T cantly affect LXisti ng housing, or create a demandfor additional housing? w 1k , A, endx.x 1. a e, of 1~ "`,p g y T WslOy�{C�YIas n y;S MAYBE Na' l3. Txansportatic n/Circulation.. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial. addit� ona vehicular movement? !' b Significant effects on existin ;parking facilities, ':and or de Tor n.ew parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Significant alterations to pr,esetit patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? „e. Alterations to ;waterborne, rail or air traffic? ; f, Increase in traffic hazards to motprAML vehicles, Aicyclists or p�edestri:ans? 14. Public. Services. ' ces . 11i11 the proposal :have rvi an effect upon; or result in a,' bstantial. ° needfor yew oj: altered governmental ,services in any of the fol owing areas a, t41re protection? qw b-. Police protection? AML G. Schools? d. Parks or other recreatiAlal facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities,,. AWL including roads? f f, ether governmental services? 15, End. 1J111 the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts:of fuel or energ,.y? � b. Substantial increase in,demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the., deevelopment of new sources of energy? 16i utilities , tgil,l th "'_proposal result ana neeE—for n .s .,tetras, or sub stahtial alteratio s`Ito the following , utilities. Appendix �`F 'page 5 of 9 d YES MAYBE NO a, Power or natural gas? AM b.: Communications systems? c--,. Water? Aft i d, ` Sewer (will 'trunk Line be extended, providing capacity to ,serve neer development) Y e.; '' Storm water drainage? g 17, Human Health. Will the proposal result int a . Creation of any health hazard, or. potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 4 1.8, Solid Waste, 'Will the proposal, result i y`signi leant impacts associated with solid waste disposal or litter control?. )� 19. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result lrn it e o s truc ta.on ,0 f ariy pub 1 - C (T designated or recognized scenic vista open to :the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an f>, aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 20, Recreation, Will thep p ro osal result i an impact upon the quality or 9' quantity of existing public �, recrea- 11 - tion facilities? 2l. Ar,cheolo°ical/His�torieal: Will the propo sa resu t � ori alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure) object or building? 22 , `Manda_�� g ,� nce for Findin s.of Si nifica A, Does, the'project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife papulatioA o drop below self , A endix F 7.- ` .page. 5 of 9 s YE,8 MAYBE NO sustai�dng levels, threaten to el;imir ate a plant or animal com-- munIty, reduce the number,or restrict the range of°a'rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important exam les of the major f �or California history pre`lYistory7 b,. Does the project have the potential to achieve short term benefits to;, the detriment of publicly adopted long-term environmental goals? " c; Does the project have impacts which ,,,are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (a projec may impact on two,or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small,, but where the effect of the total of those impacto on the environment is significant,). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on` human beings, 1� either directly or indirectly? I Appendi.xF page 7 of 0 DISCUSSION OF £NVIRbNMENTAL EVALUATION This proposal , is a rezoning of a 0.37 --acre parcel (Aly/ 43-C3 23) from -R Suburban (Suburban Residential) to R-3, (Medium. DensitLy,, Rosidential) She one-third plus acre: property is located on the northwest corner of Lindo Avenue and 12th Avexaue, several. YLundred feet west of 'the ..Esplanade in the csntral portion `�f the Chico Urban Area. Lindo Channel, which carries storm water drainage for the entire eastorn"Chico-f6othill area during winter, lies across Lindo Avenue from the site. The pro- perty is an urban lot consisting of ,stable Vina loam. ,soil which slopes naturally toward the` west away from Lindo Channel The site currently is occupied by two `I -bedroom residences;, one of which: is to be removed and replaced by a duplex. Tie sux-rounding area is predominantly in urban --density single-family residential use with a few duple-tes to the south. Remnants of ov dha.rds lie to th.e , north and west on larger parcels. The property lies in the fax eastern; corner of ,:� lar8e S --R district. To the south and east is A-2 zoned land, to `tho 'north across Lindo Channel is land within the City of Chico mid to the west and :north= ` west is S -R zoned lands. The Butts, County General Plan designates the area for medium -low density residential use, -° dwellings per acre. ; The existing S -R zone requires P, 'minim m 8 125 square feet per parcel, which therefore prevents division of the 16,100 square -foot lot. The proposed. R._3 zone will permit 3 or LI- anultaple-family dwellings, based on the General flan, designation; assuming that sewage disposal can be accommodated. The Butte County Environmental -Health bepartmant tentatively does not f'orsee any 'problems with -theproposed duplex; and believes the site may even accommodate four rnult'ple-family units (two duplexes)` since the site possesses Vina loam soil. which 18 'very good for sewage disposal. 1(b),3(b): Development of multiple -family residences, on .the site Imay coven a larger porton of the site with imperVio,!As 'surfaces' than is pre sently developed as additional buildings;,,pavem.ent, etc. are conccructe'd. These impervious surfaces will increase sti face water runoff. ?(c), 16(e): Localized ponding may occur during heavy'storrns since the area presently has no storm drainage facilities. Rowevstdrainage from. the 1/3 -acre property should not be substantial. The property slopes; -naturally toward the vest, away from Linda'Channel. The land area to the west is presently/ under study for the establish- ment of the Northwest Chico tori Drznage District, Rbwevr, the proposed district boundary excludes 't�a0se parcels 'immediately adjacent to Lindo, Avenue, with the assumption. that these properties will drain .,, f' Appendix F page 8 o directly into Lindo Ch.,*ninel. However; the natural gvadientt of the area is away from Lindo Channel Also, the high wO.',or elevation of storm flows in the channel during peak flows may p:rfwer:t discharge into the channel. The But -be County Public Works Department will requ!,re development of a permanent drainage solution. A drainage plan" rauOt be submitted to that department for approval. 3(j): - Lindo Channel is designated, as ��,.;fl�tid hazard zone by the U.S. Department of Housing and, Vrban :Devel:opment, Vederal Insurance Admin. on their "Flood. Hazard Dounda:Ly Map" This property lies adjacent to but outside of the design.�p'ted flood area. Loral ponding durinL storms may occur without quitable storm drainage facilities, 4(a.) : 'fThe property is bordered by a row of large mature trees along 12th Avenue. The proposed development could result an removal of some 'or most of, these trees, as could widening of 12th Avenue. 8(a) : The higher density of residential use allowed by th.� R-3 zone may result in greater noise generation in the neighborhood. , 8(b): The majority of residences in the area. are :a.rigle-family dwell i e s. Some residents of , the area may feel that mul t'iple-family, dwell- ings will not be compatible with the existing patty rnof residential use in the area.,, 117 12: The proposed higher -intensity residential zoning will result in the developme3it of additional residences or- the 1/3 -acre parcel ( or , maximum.) and in an increase in population of the immediate :area. Approval of this rezoning could encourage additional:" rezon:i.ngs on nearby lands 15(a) She additional residential, use will result in me minor in- creased traffic, loads on,. the area's lightly -used residential local access Toads. Present traffic on, Lindo Avenue has been, measured at 821 ADT just north of 12tII, Avenue (1977 Public Works count) ; 1Lt :'Urban public service levels currently exist in the area. 16: Utilfty facilities currently exist iii the area adjacent -to 'the site. Appendix P page 8a of � a LE D L��� +E OF DETEMINATION FEB 20 1979 TO: 17 Secretary for Resources 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1317 MARK A.NELSON,CountyClork Sacramento, CA 95814 L py 47s °iY.�1oL�2.3©iaJ ,,.. oepo/ A /X County Clerk. County, of Butte FROM: (Lead Agency) 1859 Billd Street 2W,It . off: -Butte Oroville. Calif ot2ja ­515265 Fn'V�_�ncri -ntal fityrn7 a q-qFr SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of thePublic Resources Code 1,1 _ Log 78-10-25-02 ro7ect Title _. Rezone A 3-p_ :. _� John Lechnep tate C, ear,ng ouse Num er I submitt' to State Clearing house r, �w ontact Person r ,.e e one Number. Bail D. Nelpon, Director (�1< i� 34-4'77 Project Location _ The nor'thwe$t corner of Lindo Avenue and. 'I2{;h Avenue in Chico. roject Descrzpt ons Rezone from S-R to! R-3 to allow con.struc•tion of a duple. This is },to advise that the Butte Count - Board of ;3u er'v'isors Iea Agency has made `th'eYf6llowing.determinations regarding the above-described project- 1. roject1. The project �~ ,will` have a .significant effect on the will not environment. 2. 7 An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project' pursuant to the provisions of CFQA, and was certified as required by Section 15035(8), 1.4 California Administrative Code, A Nega=tive Declaration was prepared. for 6his project pursuan to the provisions of CEQA,_ A copy of the Negative Declara- tion may be examined at the Environmental Review Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California 95965; 3. /7 A Notice of Exemption was fled`indicating this project is exempt from environment,a,l review. . /� Appendix H - page 1 of2 AdIlk r q rr NOTICE TO A P.u1C,11.FT .-- REZONING i 4J-03-2 .— _ 'hco, Butte County, Calif, Location: West La:n:do ��- venue C , p e (-4 Go 11 c rt1, . c+I �� �5�� s �,. V., -.r i a, 1; +l, Cil 1 S i r dwelling units per g10ss acro. As the a�)'�i�.iomilt .I.'b:4� '1 h'! �`C'C��1E?"r�laCC� 1'ov',on,,in °C`�.6r°G'1'L'll �Q oxi Linu Is tlu� �'�'��4�'L�o��:",k���r k7aaW(?em (;h!'�t11,'I:r� ,oLix'1t�' 7,o P t,vvb hur; 'bl,ot,: r �'()�.ra' 7.ned G��x1�,1:��� 1.1un. ,.'���cl �r�y ��c.:wo,n�,��1�; :r�;c��i,.�'r , o 1i�t� 6v, %ix� U '�• ;21� I).1 f1;11x1:11'1c", "t,'I `.0 T11E`ff�Y�� Y'h �Tl ' lll'� :1>; t l `" '"l7laLx.1' flt! •�i 1.ont1C�1I.� Am aWivc., that �,ho !,'. 1111 '1i�hry. �'l.t•'�/•.1.. iG1. d ka C.,Onform to the County f,Jd V~ � 1 -til.• �' 1,t l �ai1 !r -,T�,l,z � � ,1 C">iJ ,1 � tr �''1�,1}�:; l.� l �yc T N IrECHNER Ski rrn ng Comb; J .9 r�3 <� I fi AML �l i r , ... i . i..,. .�.�•. r. ti.A..rw .,,r >,w..�.r.: x.w .ram,. ..e -,.:.ter.... i .• .,, � pile No, .:. E.crouw No. 3F�hK.:titi - LbenNo. pYFI�r1 I K } l 1 1 �r,'1 wr: aJF MIDVALLEY JRIE ltfQ ESCN0ISY W1;Y�ltt Ara t 1211 Ptt C9i6 WHEN RECORDED MAIL M John'sl. Lochnor •» C'.,,? 9° l� I.rt Gtr �LL4 II t nCCGtw£4 �� �� j51 Vnl'lombro44 Avppub FEE chicoi ciair. 95926 A - r _ e.IAdi nGUe ?Wt.ItN[ /on ✓fdombi Mt U{l. _ MAIL TAX STh7 MENT5 70: DOCI.y virAAY TRAwrA TAX 1 26.95 uA1SF. A5 l(Si1i'�. , ..,, Cwwyf.d on me to%�w3.rgb+1 M re}pe d p�awlr eomiY.dJ OR. ,. �' ++. Stx�ryl nn Nstayrtlrnion arerlles lM.rw weurrcraxw 7 " '_,w r �•.•�••y I dKl��a AOMtO•WMrMrywTlr'}'�T NMM ...J J',. J•,,;^,Raa coKtpti,Y GRANT D t E 6 t FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,rtxelpt of which h hettbv, MMhbwlnip.d _ t t?LR if♦ »71 ^,. ''( >r r . � n Tlf,r.p«,«, t tiftl91lh.A�i..Yll +'� k!�rQ.l w +�:� �'i I��wM ��:;r�Z tr r'd�' : ^"C•' ','I`"'I",11, wran�nnS nrrf t+if� �. '. henW bRANTIBI to ,-r+Itil a, 1wr«i�r�",�a '"ilTl';ntl '»nnl A'{ h:t,n hn�....FrA i!•nnnj+.Jt - the. twit ptopeny in th4 MIV of 1J.'"'tl)r�t'^C!`t1 ice\ f. County of '..11': w? , Shlr' of Cefllomle, Eewribad u , 6 I,, Deed April 1. lib - y� �Ilt70 Co. _ AI.1 OMNIA � r-Ic'�Ftrii REQ COUNLV DC n 0 4 M /. p��a Dutto W 197A�'i�,?, ' ��� Oro1 {t11iEI /�Y! t1..Dfe .mr tri YN7 .•Y»•'d• e. NP4ay eMllt K. In ind fa a.d 11n. twwrvilr .[.twwd ipUiD .}i .IlAtll or,�.t- `r rpy y t ^•al�rdfYi Q _, 4,JelinOt Ntl traKuYttL/elrsrlch and Ti t0k3y dthY3(b" 46a 4pinrl.,}th.u4it..r4.4 at.•itli.:.ti': of a tt.14 ut AL - ine..r. to ♦wu•,ma oma_ Eo-..... JACK D DOWN G� - pawn «Frw wne5,,r.ffi.. a A,+"[, ww....upt e.wo•.u- rrb.:tb.1 m. rMi. ,nevwna.l rd et\paNalp.n Vue tho eJ•hr\ w wal - - _ _ � - ,e..5�lai.n•..i< "w1TNtf3 tM' = hr efiRrl rf. :arc 1•)+» t ,.x,. t.er.Ri.. ae, Ntr I' - ;�.' M • «_, , « ., ,,,,e,, ,. •« rJ tr.rr.ww ,<••, 17-4 •a. Mr' ".41 Y.�1.y1 Novel .R:+ bK Q. brown' . .. ;� MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED AobVt ° fi�i...ru�i,e.rowr • ,=wL:iAl.r�..•..�:rrar.,,:w..�..�-.:lLi�„ 1=_�Yf.�u__ .�. q All that cartain reel property aituato in the County or Batton State oT Ca2tfornla, doacribod as followst j A portion of Lot 49 of the Fourth Subdivid.ion of the John Bidwell Rancho, according to the orficiol Nap tbereof rile ' no in the ofrics of the Reeordor of the County of Batt*, statt of California, more particularly doacribod a$ fol "at o"tartrlyGtit a helhA line or In -laid 24$fotlrs orthocaterlyfrom the Southwest corner of snid Lot 49, and runttlne,�thonco at ripht 0"16m11orthw6storly 76,0 foot; thence at 'right angles Southuod'torly gad parnllnl with West twelfth 7.0 feet; thonoo ►reoterly Q,•q 'twelfth Avonuo ,Avenue at right onglaa North» foot; tbonce at right angloe and parallel Frith West Northoaatorl to y tbo ti a paint on Woetorl� lino of of Wont Linda gvonuo; thence Southoastarly algnp, aoatern line of west Linde Avenue 16$,3$ feat more or loan to a point on the Southeiwtarly line of said Lot 149r also being tbo contor 11110 Of Want 21ao1fLh Avenue;; thonco Sogthwoatorly along cantor line of :Went itirolTth Avenue 125.71; foot snore or lord, to point of beginning. N The Northwesterly line of the land horoby doacribod in identical with the Southnaator�,y lino of the land doacribod in 6 Dced exocuted by C. 'C Landis, ak ux. to Ivan P Johnson,; of uz, dated rune7 6- and recorded Juno 9, 1948, tinder Butte County Rocordorrt'serial•H6 4 . 17262. c» Y Y is S :D CF DNc?l� Co, plp �lninq a ;. ' �fcrrni f- �i BUTTH COUNTY PL NN.I'NGi 00MMl : ;S;f ON STAFF FINDINGS January 24, 1979 Z , 'loin Lochner lZr luno ETON "SM CSuhurbou • Ro'sJ cl. Kan!) fl to 0R- 3„ (Mcdium Density ty Ros Ident:i.aa l) I)Tu ort.y 1. caged on the northwest cOra7c TM 61est 12th Ave. 4 T.,,i.n41vAvc3.. identifi.dd''as All 43-0�-2,3 Th:e opo-third plus acke proPrrty .i.s l.ocatod an yho, northwofk cornet 'S,, of: Linda Avcaauc, ajid 12th Ave-nuo, 50veral hundred ;foot tvcst of tic' I l�slal.aanatde In the central: port of the Chico Urbaan l�eea,� 1�.ir�do �Qh aaanej lies across Linda Avenue .from the sa.td. 1, � r. 1'it t�i.tc: currently is oecaaY7a,ed icy two hbodroom rosy plan as, one O which is to ho >ramovocl incl replaced by a duplex, Tha sul Dnd;irf, a en is predominantly A .aa ban-donsi.ty single -family roszdbn ial usp, with a ('oo, dupl.exe s to the south. Remnants of orchards Iii; to the nur.tk' and wast on Urger Parcels. The Tai°tpOvty lies in the: far eastern comer of a 1=0 S-Rodtidr,ic-t To the south aan,J east is A-2 zoned l.a.nd, to the north WAS Jai.M Channel, is Iona within the C'i'ty of Chico, and WOO West Vd. Borth- ' west is sR zoned Was. . The Butte County Goner. al PInn des':i gnaltc; the a,.rca 'Ior niedi.um-law dotsity, ac�sido>�t..i::al uso, A dwellings !��at acres rlle 'proposed ilt"a zonD will Permit mult:i.pl.e"kaama.l.y dwol,l.:ing,I based an the General Plan de:s i.gnat.i.on, The l3u,tte County l.'tblic Works, Department Will require q doyoUpment„ o C i a p ma-nont dra.inagc: sol.ution4 A drainage plan must lar submitted to tltjt dopzrtment for approval. s' Urban pa bl a.c AG ry ce l.cvgls currently exist V the aatoa.. nt,i.l.ity .facily,t o'!j currently oxa.st a.rt the area adjaacpjt to the s:it& f c q rt 43-03-2', 3 43-03-4 43-03-7 F, E. 6 E. C. Whitcher Ila McGampbell, J. A. F G. S Vt�ekel 243 1Y:. Linda Ave. 237 1V Lin do Ave. 21 iY Lindn Ave.' , . 95b216 Chico C�a Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, CA. 95926 43-Q3-8, 9, 4303 -11 \ F, G. Ray R. (3•Broadway 200 �. lirirold C Latimer„ Chico, r.z. 95926 RL'. 2, "Box 267C111Co, Ca. 95926 43-03-1.2 43 0'';_43 43»p3 -S4 Shirle" N. Burnham 230 11 12th Ave. A. I=, R. M. Piazzis 242 West 12th Ave: n,, 'Y,; F �. xq. �McA.voy 304 rY 12th Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca. 95926 Ave. Chico, CA. 95926 43-03-1.3 wl 4;3-03-16, 17 `'.,53.03-18 Helen M, Ruby 308 1Y 12 tli Ave. Helen M. Dunbar r„} 316 1Y 12th Ave. J. F V. Malmquist! 334 ,,' Chico, Ca. 95926 Chita, Ca. 95926 1'l 12t.h Ave . Chico, CA. 95926 43_03-19 45=03-20 Z`i” R. C. 6 A. Peterson 351 111 Lindo J. w. F, D,..(,L. Keeley 1307 Chase St,- :E. G,_& A. B Hansen P.O,, Box 195 Chico, Ca. 95926, 'Novato, Ca: 94'647 ;, Chaco, CA. 9:5926` 43'-"3-22, 43-03-10, 235, 24 43-061-2 E. 'R.• Al L. Henman/� .: 657 °Vallombrosa 'Lane, John Lechner• 3S2 Vallombrosa i,Ave: Willow -E. Gardner 307 1Y l2tl.� Ave.Chico, C.a. _ 95926,,., Chico, Ca. 95920 Chico, Ca, 95926 45-061-3 43-061`-4 43-061-5 _ V. 8( 'i. Dickie, 2179 Shoshone Ave. Prank Johnson P.O. Box 3654 Dept of Veterans M•Affairs 17 ,5hoshone Ave 21 Chico, h iJ �' , Ca, 9S9?6 Chico, Ca. 95926 Chi.. o, Ca`. 959}2.6 � 43-Q6r��_,i 4:r-063-2 3 43-061-7 43-06 18 1.9 .2 -1, 4; Betty J. Lewis Irene ,L: Gehrke L. V. F, L, I.-ira`rd 21718 A,l fgon'Kin 2153 Shoshone Ave. 333 W 12th Ave. Chico, Cr. '95926 Chico,, Ca. 05926 Chico, Ca 95926, 43-062-2,' 20, 21, 22 - 45-D62-6 • �, Gen-- F. Caren c L . A. & L :' A ,43-062-1 R . L . & E ; Tarwate Rt . 1 , 13ox S48 170 Ave. E`,' 1074 B East Ave. 95938 `Sacramento Chico Ca , 05_42 6 Chico, Ca. 95926 4-) 'os53 -1 4.3-061)"3 43 -06'3+-4 11. A F Button S. & L. Statham Joseph Scotch)ler P.`O. BOX 253 .PiO. Box 1539 121 111 Lindo Ave. Chico, C^. 95926 Chico, Ca. 95 26 Chico, Ca. 95926 4i:-063 -5 43' 43 0-6a -7, « "G3'-fi John Schlienzr R. rI. Ese,lin E. J, Ft k.,,1°. Sh 205 111, 11th Ave. _ 4926 Clark Rd. Tit 1 6 " 'x 2� 8r� Gh eco C_,_ 9926 0 Parada Ca. 9 9 5.9� t ,e�, BUTTE COUNTY PtrA `QNl::IIS 4zIC3N MINUTES - January 24, L978 2. .Toha Lechnor - Rezone from "S- '� (4zzT�tlrhar,-Rrsi�lerit ial} k to TSR-3,• Uledium i? UcnrsitT esi�lenti�tl} nroircrt 1r at cl on the northwest q- :'ner o f t` ast 12th Avenue and I,. ndo, Avenue, identifies--r s AP 43-03_23,more particularly Aescribed as: portion of Lot 49 of the Fourth Subdivision of the Johrn Ric1l�=e11 R,raic;jo, according to the Official thereof on file in the office of the Recorder of the County of Butte, State of California, More described as E-0II01"rs Bj'.. I' NINCI at I -point in the center of Twelfth _ =lvorme on the southeasterly line of said Lot 49-' Iocateil 245 feet- nort]teasterly from the southl-cst corner of said Lot' 49 and running .hence at right angles northwesterly f f�.� feet; titerct at right gin. les soutltjtiesterly and parallel with jVest Tinel; fth Avenue 71.f) feet ; thence at 4t right an Ie< r: rte: esterly g5.11 Feet; thence at right ars *Its ±;I T��:�-allel with nest 12th Avenue northeasterly to a paint on the -westerly line 9f Kest- Linda 'tvenzac; thence southenstcrlIT along t-cstern lint' of I'Vest L nolo venue 165.36 feet more - car less zo ;t mint an the southeasterly Line of said Trot 49, also Doing the -centerline'of If sr 12th .Avenue; thence soltthwestt:rly along centerline of- W09t 12th .',ventzt* 125.74 feet more or less, to point of rontainin 11.37 acmes, more or E* 4 : I1ico. E-C. 79-57i-1-4ff Sfaff finciiF =2 teertx read by hv I Ii Mxtter1`ie1.. Ile ax4o read a letter from Robert` E;_ 'c=tc�t c>�a, SiI 1+,_ Isinclo- Avenue, E`1�iro, nh e�tin�F to anu further construction can mult1ple LilvelIIngs in the area. Proponents.- 'Mr- Lecnner presented .a map S101,Fing the location of the following -multiple dwellings in the area: ZI''cluplexes, 1 triple, Parcels with ? houses on l 1Gi, 1 parcel with 3 houses. ? mobiles, and added that . there werlp many rentals in the area. p Earl :Nelson stated that this project �§ relat>vE1v s�,all and that the impact on the enviro nment wouldnot be n"reat , Opponents: No one. The hearing teras closed and Commissioner Lambert, noting that the :+legative Declaration had ,been considered, what the proposal would be in compliance with the General plan and that the derelcpment would be coppatible With Present development-in the area, -Made :a motion to recant ens" aper€ i-al. Her. motion was sE�con:ded by Commissioner Bennet-,,. AYES: Comrytis,sioners]3ennott and Lamtzert and yChairman lvneeler. NOES: No one.: ABSENT: Commissioners Gilbert anti 8�verhax6cl. Motion- carried. — . s f-ate 7y iftL �Y:^ rk ll 79- 272 ADOPT ORD19ANCE 20021 PUBLIC,HIzARI13G; JOHN LRCHNER PROPOSED NEGATIVE IJ DECLARATION AND REZONE FROM "SR" (SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL) TO SMR -V (NEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) PROPERV LOCATED ON TIME NORTHWEST CORNER OF,'tiEST 12th AVENUE AND LI13D'0 AVENUE YDENTIVIED AS AP 43-03-23 CONTAINING 0.37 ACRES (MORE OR LESS , CHICO The public hearing 'on John Lechnev proposed negative declaration and rezone from "S~Rig suburbaxt rosidential) to "R-3') (medium density rejidential) property located on the northwest corner of West 12th Avenue and Lindo ;Avenue identified as Ar 043-23 containing 0.37 acres more Chico was held as s advertised a `\Ir or less Earl t3el,son, environmental review 4r0ctar, set out the,:bacicground of the negative 'declaration. This is a relatively small project and for that reason the impacts noted are small-i:n magnitude. The .request is for multiple Family residences • . There are a ,number of single family ,and some re duplexes to the south, The other question relates to drainages '"T�lay is a proposal to farm a drainage district. This property drains aw from Lindo Channel "a The pxoj ec,t is small and the problem can: be 'solved . He recommended a negative,deciaration. Mr. Nel,.on stated that he has beef, $ advised by Counsel 'that cumulative effects have to be hung atx tangible effects They are looking at this project somewhat by itsclf, He felt; that it ,would be a Board policy to consider the entire arepp a,:n "anyoapproval. e to the The determination to require a noEllt�wou dve cnutabeonecesn rela sary inxthis casei importance of the impacts and an Supervisor Dolan stitod that where one project; might Ise okay it might be another project: that might have impacts. Bettye Blair, .1 lannin`g da rector, sethis proposal ba6kground of the' (.r� rezone, The Planning Commission Sound that tt� p oposal conforms to the general plan and has a densi,, at 5 to B. dwellings per deme. She has presented the Board with a map �outhhat �rlThe a�A52thzone ahas mbeen Lquit,ehe 11 -z1' zoniAg acrasa the streetto the s vone of about 10 or 12 years,, activb � The '' -[t'' zone is a very, old .r Clay Castleberry, public works directorA repotted on the drainage situetaon in the area. The permanent solution, for the natural` " drain would be Lindo Channel. fie felt that the'' drainage problem could ti be accomplished ,as a community efforta The'dxasn)age plan should be ; approved a � op art to tltr public, Appearing: John Lechner. Mr. Lochner Hearing. stated that in a three block .radius tho're are eleven duplexes. "There are about faux of thea across the street. There is also a new triplex in the neighbozhoodh Hearin close i` ' the Board. d to the public and confi'��ed to On mot�,on of Superv`i.sor. 'Wheeler, seconded by Supervisor 'Moseley and carried, the proposed negative declartConexohWesolzl2thfrom Avenue -" to "It -4" property 10cated on the northwest and Lind' Avenue identified as AP 43-0323 containing 01..37 acr,„s more 0” less,, Chino was. accepted on the basis of the findings that l.he proposed project �l,ou]d not 'have a significant effect on. the env;irolvnent and chat i permanent drainage pla n be required by Butte County Public Works Department. ACES: Supervisors,Ntoseleyj Lemke. NORSa Supervisor 'Wheeler and Chairman °x Dolana. AtSEIM.i �� upez�isor W_nst:an � "s�