Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT. 79-45 34441-7y k ! Ms. of, Chico (� 1'fiGl3a °°� Ramsey �"fi]�i't�=11�;i �,�l�la inc. 778' ���5�'�t�� 40M T? UK , SUMV 2 �.1������;,'t;.�. �"",�,'��► `��� yy ��Ckh ,} ���.'�,1t.,.i `SO.J. 1�7��k:'. if hiiUF Sf✓U,Y10 coiI 48, io `'I}h II �S4�4.'�� 4720. JIM It � „I P � URS RS 6b 1 tr��n.l.�t )�aF�i�G ��i� St, 40 4.1 , `.F � ' LJ' (} " .) :7 ' .. ��'n.,,l''�..-'�� I 4 8 •` Cj- '41i� WWI Gciltu Ind Pavi1 � Ia 'X. i�ro�k`n WO Richland 1�had - ,r n Chico; Can 95926 C1]Cp, „ Lf 40 -01-4 48-014 ; ar tcah. "j. R. D. VNIUKT. V � ,T1. � � . v .cGr"'t d Y' ' 62 Allison � �P.� ., �� l,aa 2?7 'Box 38 ,� i"ll.shpr: Magic _0 �lTrada, Cali 6OQ2 C���.c0, C 9m; Chico, Q4 9SM6 { il, 11, 16 o r 48-0:1 � 5 Ci Dan 1 als it 0 M 800. H, C'S'C. sa c Margo Unt � F. 75S a sic; t,Itinod o / G6 East Ave . 1.11, South.cit �CN 119 j, (Wax ca. .95026 Chico, Ca. 7.5026 ��cCi.Cl111f�. i:�. .0Al01 48-0017 i . rox 085 .r r l CGrI r. , ,5 !f s r. II( BUTTR COUNTY PLANNING C(1MMIS810u STAFF rzNDINGS - February 7, 1979 A. REZONING 3.- Dan Hayes Rezone from !'A-211(General) an'd ",�'ntc:rim A-40" (Agricultural 40, acre parcels) to O's 3'! ,;. ' (Subu°roan Residential - 3 acre parcels) P�rope-rty I � locatedi on the east side of Colia:sset Road', approximate1y 1 -mile north of BRton Roads• identified as a 'portion of �i AT' 4.8-01M9y 10, 13, 61 lfi, mVe particularly described 1' as: r• The W 1/2 of the N{V 1/4 and the N"1/2 vl of the SV 1/4 of Sect ion;` 2 T2 2N, ` Alt MOW excepting '•therefrom all that portion located -within the westerly 300 ft. of said Section 2. Containing 111 acres, more or less, Ch.ico,, The applicant states: "Ile wish to rezone this property as to the E1.R that has presently been written for this area'," ft , One of the considerations of this zoning request involves the proxx'mi.ty' }of the project areas „';1�the Chico ?+tunicipal Airport , and the susceptibility of pro specti'1►c�residents to excessive noise exposure from airport functions and the,general level of safety of these residents dueto flight operations.: " The 'Airport Environs Plan' for the CUco°]Municipal ,Airport 4, evsluated,` the airport operations in conj ;%ct ,on with compatible devEslopmeni of surrounding°properties, thexehy establishing a co.tdinated growth plan for both the airport and surrounding ' area. The study included the collection of hand use and zoning information and the analysis of significant environmental cons t,ra.ints-.., From this information, guidelines for devc,lopment xn the airport environs were :Formulated. Compatible Land Use Zones (CLUZ)'were .:developed by superimposing. " p _ rs' aircraft flight corridors and land wise exposure boundaries Recommendations were then formulated based � oi>>xersbi boundaries, ,b4r� the collective constraints appropriate an eachCLUZ category. Approximately ,3/4 of the area proposed for ''SR 3'' zoning is identified in. CLt�Z_, Area area(�pi.e.,rhet itl�znparcels CNEh� 55, noise level � which'are with in 'airport ' . boundary) The 1/4 of the site is not encompassed in the Airport ,Gnviro,ls Plan The proposed "`''SR -'3',' zoning appears t,o satisfy the minimum density standards for development in the report; The: rezone ares, does no encroacTi into the flight corridor. VP BUTTE COUNTY P'LAtihfN0 GON ,IIS,�Q:1! SPAP,F FINDINGS - Pebruary {ys} ,, y is .: 1..�--1 �) ',• Staf'£ has 'determined th�a`c­the proposed rezone. cor�iI)Iies with the 3 ecommenda'eions of the 'AirpoT , ;Environs Plan' >t, l r The proposed Zoning'15 cons stent with ,the County's Cle;ncral Pian ;i designation of Grazing, Open Lazed (1. 5 acres per dwell ing una,t) . The project site is adjacent t� `existin ;:'urban development s (z.e ., Chico Municipal Airport,and related sertrioc.$) ; lYo.wever the site is non -con ous; to existing, resicier.tial de;velopment The ,Chico 'General Plan shows an ;.Open space fraz ncr ciesi,gnatian. , in Lie Commissions ? op�n�z�n ro�ic'ent,ial d0'vclopmeftt ° `�n tided now or ,in the future in ,,;}fie vi tin,_i ty of the airport, the project site appaeaxs to ba an appropriate choice for such a f cility. The Health pepartment states "T11.1s is in a very marginal .soil area - soil conditions'' may or may not permit division into 3 ac. pa.rc.els. TAIL ' have no objection to the rezone -provided an},, divisions meet the xequiremenfi ,of „t.he Land T?ivsinn lydnance, �r The Department 61, Public Wor�:S states: "This area is rapidly developing. There have Been parcel maps and,, subdivisioi 'maps recorded in this area. Roadtilay and access problems do exist, ll J, i WiTT �,OOV 1` IY plaA 1 1Nt CO S51( 1 :0,1407V Vebrua�,y Dan, I'� ' ^jy'S w oto an8 frojtt gricultilral (Cera" 1� nc xnteriM Ar,40,19 - 4p acre pa"rce�.$) to +tg a r' ial - acre parcels) (SO urban" Tte,si�ox�t- Coha"scot Road, anP bXimately 1 "mike north.o Paton side o P a property located on the itXentified as a paxtzan of AP�48-p1�J, 1Q, 13 t1 more particularly de's�.r bed as . T"he W 1/2 .apt the N;V 1/4 and the. N 1/z the � 7�It ; � (ire T xN R� . , ,p g �t��e°�r�j�q,„� � Mn.M .e�cozn x� o p n lc"catec within the west ' + {,�s''o,rly 30Q` fit;,Of Con ,aining` 151 acres' r more' ore -ss Chcoi MrM Butterwick read stmt" findings, commenting that an r3mportant' c.on.- s clera ion of this request involves the pxoXci,mity of ,the subj t p:operty t0 ,the 4 Chicr) Municipal `Airport arid" the susceptibility of prospect�ivde —es der.'*s to, excessive x oise levels., , He ,added that the proposed density' (SR -3) is within the guidelines fOr ".,.development adz acent to 'the ,axxp.ott, i +' p ons Plan." as outlined �n the Ai- ort EnviT Bnvironmental Director Nelson commented that an impact report made some Months' ago for a .larger ;area encompassing this area covers the impacts o this Px'd.7ect, Ho said that as many as 43 xesidences were possibleunder the proposal and added that this is not a particularly environ - me iitally s.en.sitive area. OPOAQnts Dan Hays said (`261) that h0 has net ("')the criteria for his L-- proposed su.bdivsion: and .that cll•aln,a,ge, ould be to ,Sheep t s. Ifiollow Creek and access from the no'ttherly ports "p, oz ly. In response to a question brought ,uhf her Bob Fxedenbttx•g (318),"84-��Tari r gold Ale : s C7Yie€i, it w;xs n,ated the t a study by Spas s. for the Child Muni- cipal. Airport Area had been re,ceirtjy completed <and :hat according this study the s ibject area � s loc�;ated: in. 1+Cbmpatible I,ana Use Zone t r+ whzch recommends a mYrxim1am dens i t f' standard equivalent to the Counts SSR z0bing District. Opponents: No The heafing was closed and Commis i.6nea� i3ennett commented that if there w�a.� ever a place that' houses could Abe r to land this is the place, and made d motion�tout in o�e�omn recommend agr'.cu,l ural approval' ":, noting haat-ta,o Proposal, teas in 'conformity ytitrj the Genexa.al Flax, His m0ti.an, was seconded by Commissioner La�nl� I t AIRDSsCOMMissiollers Bennett,' tgjjbert, Lambert and Actin Chair n' Everha.ld* g a_ NOBS: No one, ASSENT: Chairman Wheeler. Motion Carried. ; BOARD ' OF SUFERVT,,90Ri& MINUMS February 27i 197 44 +ADO)O'� MIN,NCE2006s PUBLIC HEARING; ,DW HAxs ENVIAO /X- ftAL ; 4C.� ` RgpfattT AND REZONE 'FROX !A,411 (GENERAL) AND '"INTERIM A,.40,r (A IM 40 ACRE PARCELS) I0 11Sit=3" ' (SUBURBAN RES=N'IIAZ THREE ACRE: PARCELS), PROPERTY LOCATED ON THia EASTSIDE OF COASSEI` ROAD, APPRO:C. ONE I.1pR OT'' EATON ROADS IDENTIFIED ASA PORTION Or AV 45-01-9,,10, 13 AND 16a The Public hearing ofttheHays +� CONTAINING 1 �,. impactpt? and tozane from A -Z ' said 'Inter A-4011- (agricultural r40 s rr �r (general) " g GAY' 9�Parcels) to 'TSR41(suburban res, denej#j . •- three ;acre a cels presperty Iodated, on the east si 'e of, 'Cohassetitnsd, approximately one n►i1e! ttort e ' or EaCon .Road, identified as ,a portion, :of AP 48-01-9, 1p,s 11 l�; and i,6� g „ cies, ,afore ox less' Chico was held as'�advertisedo v containing 137. a s .Z the' envEarl ertaln) , environmental revia5$ -directory .set out the backgroun' d olf pact report. The property.undet consideration ots:ls. 130.acres. This was pant of a large ,zon%ng proposal .thab�; came t �y t before the Board. This was dur g the'discussion of a�rpatt no 64 and housing. The noise study was undertaken. The information from nhe 'no se study has ,been incorpoi;ated into the ttit. iri the ,interim zoning'., a g�Qa , 4 portion of ttxe proposal was tiiodifisd, The area had been..requested for nA-5"1 zoning' and nota the request is for ""SR -S" toning. The .impacts °af the two zoning districts are similar enough and the ETR can be used. The major environmental areas of concern include, increase .in traffic, d ainageipc=rease, loss of Open space and an increase it. tha need for p p Providing . _ublic services. The noise factor is still there, ' The southwest corner of the property is cut by the 55CNL control line. That is an acceptable noise level for a residential devolopment, In review tha•C ptoJectr tie did not feel that there were any impacts that are great enough to be termed significant adverse impacts to require the need for overriding measures. Bettye Blair, planning director, set .out, the background of the rezone. This was heard by the planning Commission, Their recommendation was to appra've the rezone. The indications regarding the expanding of the project is that the developer is waiting for the intense study regarding the land use in this area before fox'mulating any fit plans. ait Hearing open to thepublic. Appearing No one., Hearing chased to the public and confined to the Beard, On motion of Supervisor Winston, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and unanimously carried, having reviewed the contents of the draft environmental impact report, the comments received' thereon, and the the final environmental responses to those; comments, the Board certified that impact report has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality ,Act, the State EIR Guidelines and the. .Butte County Enviraiunental Review Guidelines., r r February 90 11979 Dara Nays 755 Plastwood ;AVenu4 Chieo,Ca. 95926 RE Rezone 79-4,5 CAP 48-01-9 1.0, 1 , F06 portion? Dear Mr. jays ; r At the meeting of the BuCOUAty PIanninq GoMMi s10n held February 7, 1979, your application for reton ;;n from �a�-2" ' (Gen oral) and I#t�tcrim A-4 Q" (Agri, tiltur it - >; 49 acro parcels) to "SR -3I (Suburbian]te ]. ,do.ntzr l - acre parcels) prOpCTt)► loCcated on the er1st Side O t✓o�'" haslet; Roam, approximately .1 Mile no,rtb Of baton Read; (3lico, was recommended for appirov I. ' A rer6rt of this matter will 'be made to the Board of Supervisors on February 13, 1979, at which time they . Will set; a public hearing. 'Y'ou trill he notified of that Mate. Should hul have any questions regarding Chis matter, £ p € ' ee l free to contact our, office. Sincerely, Bettya" Blair Direct6tr of Planning •M.1e11R'Y�..Iwtrr"iw-.•_ ...., .. 'sem._.... . ... -. .,_.. IJ f Ask All .57762 ORDERr , '}'((� 'j'�i '�ttgy'�`� that IT .14 QRDE�D' that �+ /dry r�r��7 +� +yy+f �'yr�yn �y� Pa,.czfic i'as and Mect�.id 0offipa1 y',, { not authorized to deviate from. the `mandatory under unding 1 ^equirements of tis elect is line extension 'rule of a:'ts tar ifrf �m Skyjpark rstat'eiq i,n Butte County. The effe�:tire r date of this order shall be the r'9 aays y after the date.hereofo Dated a: San 'r xrri c ' C.a1i.fo=i1 a, this day of epn'rrS�Ct�p "q lwa J % (;vkir, ,k„K.xew 5 AOL {' ` Wee -rand 0 UM 0 �3ettye Blair, Director of Planning nR neo Kyle Butterwi c " Ug4E Review of Dan 11 ays: rezOne from IA-F� and Interim fl4to t1SR_ Vii: D E• 4 January 15, �.��. 9 _ to As you kiaQw, perhaps the most important consideration of this request i..volves the proximity cf the project, area to the Chico municipal Airport.. Of particular interest in this .regard is "the susceptibility of prospective residents to oxce,s'aive noise ex- . posure from airport; functions and the,'general level "of safety of these residents due to, s�.igh t opstations. 'hese concorn.sand many other ,issues have been oxamined, in the �.� ''>A.irpopt L'nvirorns Plan' for the Chico ,Municipal Airport: The objective of this report was to evaluate the ai:rpojt opera ons inconjunction with the future development of Ou.mound:in.g prop-- erties, tl erel y establishing a caard noted growth plan �Ebr both the airport and surrounding area. �;Yie study � xxc�w�ided `the collection obi of land. use and zoning information. and the anal.y'sis of,. si,grs .ficant environmental constraints From this information., guidelines for development in, the airport environs store formalatod.. ' More specifically Compatible' Band Use Zones ( CLU'Z� were d4+v tslVp+�'d t � +L" � • K • 1G by superimposing noise exposure contours, aircraft flight corridors and land Qwnershap boundaries -�Recommen,data ons were then formulated based an the collective constraints appraPriat;e, in each CLUZ categ xy. Approximately 3/4 of the laa4 area proposed for 11SR-3" zoning is iden.tif'ied: in CLUZ Area V. The remainin. 1/4 of the site is not encompassed in the Airport tnvirons Plan: and is, therefore, Presumably not affected by the study: The OLUA V ' category includes peripheral parcels which are within the airport influence area, i. e. , within the OUL 55 noise level boundary. The, report i recommends the following standards to devel..opment in this category. 1. "A zoning classification of ,ISR --1.1' should be applied 'to the single parcel east of CZC contained 4 thin the Int-pPrim' Zone Bo•un.d.ary." The parcel referenced here dogs include a portion of the rozono area; howeve,t' the proposed "SR -3" zoning Certainly appears t, satisfy the minimum density standards for developmebt. The least restrictive zoning for the remaining; parcels should be "SRI'. 11 Again, the proposed "SR -3" is .�y�wemin gly appropriate. 3. "The parcels with segments intruding; into the fl1_g11t corridor ` ,� fold not of be, developed: ;in. these segments. ►' The rezone area does riot encroach into the flight corridor. ,r ;r - It WL REZONE RE, PORT A�pllGant lean ,iIaye J t1. Cerner t Daiays, " Re nest; To rezone from "A " (General to 't R..��� 9 .. �- Subug_agidentia acme arce16 l aoetttian: Easau: of Cohasset Roads a r'oximatel; miZ no'Eh of ) r _Ono ' I Eaton Road, . hico . 1 r , Date Aotion .Requeeto4a ll/2 28 {i , ° iumbe3:„ of Par oels : A,cr(-age: l acres „ Vl. nninLx Qopllmis�f, n Pindinegz Felt if there was ever, a -place -that_ house „ could. bei t in of der. to �aave . arra �u� ttzral-1�d this is the -place. Pl anhlng Comaissia Action.,, Recommend approval; the nroposal was in conformi,t`y with she General flan: 4., Cl .. isoto: Commissioners Be=et, Gilbert' Lambert and Acting Chairman Everhard. AYES 4 - , NOno ABSENT Cha .rmah Wheeler ABSTAIN « Nene i ,l yn h Ax MemorandumY • �P. y Butte County Asses sor",'s, .Off_ice FAPM:s Butte• County PlanningBea tt end 5USJECT; ., r• OATRI Pursuant to Sectian 65863.5 of the Government C66e, they 01•�o�vizag5­1�;/paxcels Iden ified as" r iau iW• 4t d XX Rezone frolll. �"'1 -3,> _ to zoning,( str`�ct. Granted a varianiceto, alloy= } , i Zssued.a conditional, use permit or Property n1< ,J9r ' k gNi i r ORDINANC NO. , APa ,I)RA',)NANCE ZONI (; A P001 4T THE'COU ` � `Z IIH tSTA' OFCA .14 K� 3 A ' K r f i1 St RA1� � i OZ ?l �' "IAh) DISTRICT PMSUANT TO � CIIRAPTW24:�� � * Th i, o . s ref Super 0 i "vs Of theeco nt)r Sta.�eg t'1 )1 i ,% Or �rkde _> `' ' '� t � x and pursuant Chip �r Pit e ' zit" �„��t1i:y' �odb )irsf.�'����'�d C,tSgara''ty DC i7FtDA,IaAT aCt%ltiz��; d ;� t 101. 'Thi he a iui� t r d+ a r ba a s s uutt d o the �"d>:int' T3w'f State, of Ca.Ahall bn srtd . s hevab `�'_zd iq , a Vit; 1�:S je (S b+axbat ,..} a idsx t a - acrs tax ,ls�' ' D strio�,\ dn►i s"uo area shaI bo15ub"jeot to tho tdstticetioos aria ,.r ► �7 ' . r s ,€114, 're a�:Sions hoveinspec fieri and ,,provided o 9 r; ii d ;' �� le`u "so, zon d b6.1►,g lddato-d in, tho un4znaoxparat0 �9 ANO Xit 1`^Ilt .� E?t$ Chico,, rnorc aarti Marl, doscxlbaxl ag .L awl 1" .. ].2 Th 1V 1 '20 of tho Irl 1/4 au the N 1/"2 of she :514 1/ 4 VVI Alto ��i�'jtl excepting thOlraf all 1-S that po� , ion lc"oatee, within tlio, west't rly' 300 ft, of said -Sodtion'7. 14 Cont.Ming. ;x.31 ac r`6 , more or f ast, Cahicol 16 S%CTIO 2, ,; CCU 1.�ATIONS Pay A Dr -S 'RIC`1': 7 The £'o1lnlaij�a 'regulations ,shall opply,ti in a "SR*-SIt` y$ Disstr�ict Zg (A) US55 P�RMITTVD 20 1, One single-family dwelling per parcolr not ln%,.lud ng 21 gents, tvailors or mobile homes 22 Acte sort' buildittgs pertinent to the permitted uses . Agricultural uses excepting a ttittimt !.off aroa, of 94 threes(3) aoro's to be devoted to residential use and y �{ he following idditional requirements for ,each oirft4l 26 kbpt can the niremites . , W. a ki r each h©xs x head a;f tlo dr 0 innrs `.. one your of agi - ei;h .. hr� $and u�►e ���r�z� 41ee'd we t,y five 12 5) �:Ua re feet', . b For each sheep Or goat twa t}'1.:4t ai4— a'(2 5 Sc Dare foot. �'. h�4 mi.nimurn lot ar" 'pox•' dW 11i.ng u,.ilt: shrill. not be.. 71, less than 3-atres� the prnvi.si.ons of See t i ori. ' 24-33, g 'u ;r otwithstahexing .) g " St. The ma'n imam lot Thai l -not be., less khan one 1.0 hunated thirty (1.to) ,: feet, hho provisions of'Section 1.1. 24-33 notwithstanding . 12 M ,, ' 1 � ' �� �iWlriir C S S S i33 'Cl., 'c� Y E( _Vtl_.NG A USli k?�:RMZ 1' a N BACH CASE., fl14 x ! Golf courses* aid country clubs, . Public and guasi-�pbbl.ic Mises including churchesa:; .16 firehouses' ll0 SP i ta l ap aC C 5 and, oU T[S ,schools 17 j end p u�t xi i ty' bu l l,dings . ubli'C' Q i ZS Sakes tsar'It office, 1.9 ection 24 -33 shah,, Appl-y e76AN''pts.ng lot wii,44th and, lot (C) Section.' Jf, f" "0 area! 2]. SECTION 3 w All, uses of land within the district not 2g specifically authorized and permitted are prohibited, t. 23 ` ECTION 4. in cowpli,aApe with the provisions otsaid '24 Matte County Carie Chapter 24 t;he, same is hereby amended by adding 2'3 this Ovdit ince in fall 20S•SCTIO'N S. The penalties for the violation of the, zoning :! c , 1 u u AM }, her .�mpostid 'Within the .41str'ictc shall be A's ' prov dod jrl the r" Eutte County C64 r Chapter Z41. this o�dintiAce shah ��q� ��d after it.s of ectiye date became t supplement to tired p' t of „thy �r�t�e 4, a, County Code, Chapter 24 p ,. �•� ��� � ION 6, This Ordinance shall be end �� � SECTION n }i;eroby do iaarer a be in full .force and effect from and afar �hxrty' .(5'0) 7, „y pa age, and before, the expita.tlon of days after the date, of ��S , „ x fifteen 15 day's afteT its nsisax a this, Crdina le shall 9 pubs isbod once with the riames of the members of the Roard of ` 10 Supervisors voting fwr and against it, sn the Chico Enterprise, d ' ll 11 newspapor published 3n the County of Butte,, Mate of rltgliforhia a r.� ' VSvEI AND ADOPTED by e Bo; ,ra of SupG ry sors of the 13 Courtly ref vtte, Sta°te of �'�ali� ,ornia, on the day of 1.19 i 9 j yby the fol lowing vot ; I ;.. FF . 1.V p 1 ([++ w�t YY �Y t' y 1`{ �y7y� +y f k y �r .i �y •j [h I` j + W .��5/ t7 k ;A7 Y ti. 1' ..tel r :7 5.1 ( .L ii.� � S} Coley, . L d { j ':' . i4 S: ,1.� ;$. 51 . #i �: �. -�F � �F W � 4h L r+r.Y 1 , a,. � ;; 16, 'i��yu,j, 14a, . 1 A C}Trt1F 18 NOT VOTING.' �r�, , ROBERT E. LEMB , Chairman, 20 Bu�t:e County Board. of Supe visors 22ATTEST' GIIARK A. NEL80Np County Clerk and ESC--or-f cio . Clerk of the, Apii,rd 2 2 All_ i� 25..�..�..W..�....�....... Cl err ' ri`I' Deputy y 1 � ' } m Y '.� j • ♦ � ♦err. f .} `�y , � � ,� : 254, �. a•:ro• r� • r l� i �A 'R• 0 R 'J' ,"<� �''�•W `" ''�, • Y � * Y�, � �',� �<d Mfr �. . G ♦ Y S �o�c+ �1`yrti �JRp •. f1�`4, r,.;•.r 10 it l I j r Pow ma..'eias BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION- HEARING.—DATES: OMMISSIONHEARING. DATESt `�� Fra►. ca�9 APPLICANT} p N NA`(S OWNER. %0u s RfAom( TO % EXis,rm ZONE., V ' YFI.` x '' LM +, �.. I ,'. ! (y„Y,tvL t.,C °'ir •T t,. 1 / .. i) .'r.., .. ;u.. aµu•e.re.va•+.M..� .,.,.. �d.rw IIw•,wxl..+'-Iq ..,.+t.,s, w ,.wui�..tk 0. i.awa a ria• ,.._a,«._ w;:..aawa.x.?.;.ie.....avrd•+,.J=u tix.,.+w�siW"vdwru.ww,:-F+i:rM�-, Y�I ..'---.;^�...=•�i3�a� "w . X 1 Ni1r 4 wx ♦r r, r v ' ,x , ',Fµ1 j}Y+� iY Y. w. •R �,4 iy' ,�.. t P p .+ .'•."."wM[rarwM1.U1 M'M"raAY9T;,pl' 7101 `... « :.. ... n; .... ,x. .t.. o -t.• ,... ,-. y..,. , tiF • i'�u A''!iF„'A�tM� J ani,^.':L.v.'�'+ •`x'Y7v �♦; awro ,r r 'v,+f,� 7 >:.:li.h.+*. ,",+..1'- x,., a't*' �o;r•. .:�' � •'� .. a �.,d. , ., z .-,.. nw ''. . rl, p'a, r,� ,, ar. „rJY. zfi "r,,;Yy �1 ...: Yr'r S, ,''4{ i �! FF�*.. ➢ 4A N''� k"'� 1'if�'1 x,,ti♦..,av 1♦ ♦lt'. raw . e. y. I .• . r, ,. . 'i 1 "; r�„+p.;',1t, rM• a1 a��."`rY �S .aa -l. ., .,}x�, r l r `r�7.rt, pW:. a i?f Z • x�f,.'Y�t.w 9+. -F',�rr.s: ..•':.♦� 9r9. <;.;� 'P'.1/, -�.°i }i 1"r �r, %,W^ab'V,� t ^+a � ♦+ . • ^ S,i �',Da• (: ,:�, r ,� rrrTer. r• tr y. , y'S r. � °a + •: ,�.. .1 h!�" �,r'_y a., Y4,♦.` r� ••tl a .tr rw y '`f.'ra. .y "� 1 -X fX a r'. �,v • r :. a �' y " +l. �y8 Ap v+4, ,•%:� '' i, `fir d"• X97 A1M �Od� �L SGS �•�� r r'�^ 7 Lt `,•' it..rt,s^�. ' y:- r� r '`` rp wY-:�, v a•}� a E4?] 4 i. ti rt u. t.�' Fj'r�yr.,'* I�......r.�1w t t i, i ,{' '♦`'fr � i,,t .+ i ' f; � : v � �♦ �8 v.•�•'y ^ r 7, • .I ',, �'* r+a 1 ,� e. � ' , f 1 � .. 14, ego �Stt' �Je ZxC'+r���tr Y ` + Y o' • . Y µ , s 156 S Ac s « •” ifi Mrr • • , x � . •/1 •:. a}. e 1 ,..,.� .- �..R..>�r�,w«.. ,..,,.. .�,....�....r.....,,. ,...,v.:..w�t�....k.6•gfr{-q�:.,�,m.«..W.r.,...,,...,,r:, , n 4 aF _. P ;,. Y tao�c. A4Name Address Phone �ort,►rl Dan Hays 755 Eastwr�od ve,•Chico 895'-8956 U t�!- �' 9 J.D. Plummer Cactus Ave, Chico 342--4036 r HO U.D. McGrady IfumbUg' Rd. Chico 345-51'77 Ir . R. V i Nor hgrav s Ave,Ch bo 342-2005 ` ray 16 yi �e ��1 erg+• ..I..�,�,_...•Y..r.�,..- ?AC 100 Ac,40ac j. ti 1 Ix r , • o I'Ix EXIII8tT ...�.. ;,. Y Assessor's Map No. 48-A! j NarE-ASSEssoms PARCH oto&^' County of SuMe, Calif. y 10t NUA ...Y, . I. • !: _, ..0 .. „ .. A arch. •/ 5 „ �� ffiEltf SHOWNClRn�fS