HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT. 79-52 1r i6 7 L j F o ✓ �-! t !
�� f f � 9 e l •.i • � 1 \,r ,y,t i
r •{ v
.'+•rte. _ P �I Y 'W 7 7
' F
4 R
41
1 . :. v 7>+ �r > 1� r Ch1 Fv " -r+ b�! •'�+i� t , � Y �y�-t� l� t� � Iri � .
Yi q • h •a or fid NAT.' I t
•' .�-i,• .t•rv>j'Skj�C� �+v>wrh�t � c,•t':•- v�.;tpi .
♦. a '�{e.4 �fJ YTC.+ Ie .l�^'��4'� 'k�f%��-`+�r`� ✓<i PK �•�Y � \ �. f..
_ ti.frS�QI
w
Pbj
r
r
♦ i.
p.
1
)v e'
Yt • C' �� Y •i h
I p
(j t" r �l,r 9i1 tl 7
1,
v
+ p'
� 1 ed .� t„� �' f��dl �t�q yy �Y' � ,.'u � -• � � a e � ” � � �� }
Y)p P
Y P, RRRCCC *h' t i
t ,
AMIN
,+ONLY:,
Receipt # �0 4:46.
t Project
APPENDIX E
Daae Si" led
Environmental Information Form 0
(To be completed by applicant)-
GENERAL iNr, ORMATION
1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor:
L1i'itL- c d t::l
26 Address of project : , !�7- %i _ln A15.,
Assessor's Block and Lot J4ub it
3. Name, address, and telep ne number of person to be contacted
concexnn�; thi;�Lr ,ect f �e ,r� t� -5Owe-,_ »
4. Type of project (i, e. r,ezo"nin,g, subdivision)
5. List and describe any other related permits and other public
approvals required for this project, including those required by t�
city, regional, state and federal agencies,;
6i Existing zoning district '
7; Proposed use of site:
PROJECT ' DESCRIPTION
8 Sate size
94 Square footage of buildings)
10: Number of floors of construction.
11,: Amount of oft-street 'parking provided. „
12 Attach site development plan, �ffgma�.Afa,tngcommo
13 Proposed schedu-3.1itg.IV I "1 1978
14. ' Associated projects. .,a ; -. ri •->. 4,..' CJres's!!, Cair..,.,,it�
15. Anticipated incremental dev,lopment.
;aMIMarfalkooaw Dopf.
Appendix E page 1 of 3
wy_
APPENDIX ,E;
- .�, Stix � _ , • , � l;7• .�
16. exf resident;,al, include t he number of units, sc17G;,�Jul,e of unit "
s ys , and type of hoUsetiol.d siz6 expected .
17. t f~ commercial, indicate the type, whe
ther neigh
botf000r re tanally o rd, a y
Lz,•,qae:ooUageosales areaand :loading s
15, f industri4l , indicate �yi] e', estrima,ted 'empl.oylrient per shift,
andloading; facilities
19, 1,C insti.tuti'O in.dica..,o elle major function c±
employment �'�� s t imated
per shift.. csi;iirieted occupancy, ` , oad:ing .faCilitie�,
and community benefits to be derived fromthe project.
20if the Project involves a variance, condi
p 1 tiona l., usc' or rezoning,
application, state this, and indicate clearly Fahy the appl catxori` is
required
Are the followingitems applicable to the proj cct ar its effects?
Discuss below all items checked es
necessar y tattach additional: sheets as
Y)
YES Np.
21, Change in existing features of any beaches lakes,
or 'hills, or substantial alteration of 9rdund contours,
` 22� Significant changein scenic v40,18 or , s
ta8 from
existing ro-8idential areas or public lands ,''rroads ,
�'.
23, SignificantLy pattern, scale or character of
general area of project;
24, Signi•fieant amounts of solid wastre or Litter.
25. Change in dust; ash, smoke, ,fumes::ct° odors in
vicinity.
f
_ •. '26, Significant chall e in lake, stream or ground water
qual `ty or quantity, or alteration of existing; drainage
patterns,
27. Substantial change in existing noise:or vibration
levels in the vicinity.
28. Site on filled land or•on slope of 30 percent or more.
Use or disposal of r„
such
p potentially hazardatts (materials,
as toxic substatices, flammables� or expl:,
Appendix F - page• 2 of 3
,1
u c_
AML A09
XE S NO 4
30. Substantial change in demand fox° municipal se���ces
(� (police, fire, water, sewage,, etc.)
3l, Substantially increase fossil fuel consum tion
(electricity, oi.l, ;natural gas, etc.) . �`
32. Relationship to part of a larger pro3ect or scrieR--=
of projects
:
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
33. Describe the project site as it exists before theproject;
including information on topography, soil stability, plants and,
animals, and any cultural; historical or scenic aspects. Describe
any existing structures on the "site, and the use of the structures.
34, Describe the surrounding pr pertaes, including information
on plants
and animals acrd any cultural, historical or scenic aspects.
Indicate the type of ,land use (re,�idential, commercial, +etc.) ,
intensity of land use (one -,family, apartment houses; shops, department
stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back,
rear yard, etc.)
,
CERTIVICNT ON: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attach ed, exhibits present the data and information
required for this initial,' evaluation to,the best of my -ability, and
that"the facts, statements, and information presented are true and
correct to. the„ best of my knowledge and belief.
A m
(Signatu e)
71
ror
n��� .
Appendix E - page 3 of 3
&PPENDU E
lo.!: residential, include the ,number o£ units, schedule of unit
szzOO, and type of household size expected;
1.7. If commercial, indicate the type, whetherr eighbarhood, city
or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area,' and loading
facilities'. r.
18 , if itdus trial
indicate type, estimated employment `per shiftyandlo�xdin facilities . +�
19: If .i.nstitutionaly indicate the major function, esl;i,znat, cd
employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities,
and community„~benefits to be derived fromthe project,
20,.. If the project involves a variance, conditional Lase or rezoning
applicatiGn, statethis and indicate clearly why the :application is
required,
.Are the following, items applicable'to the project or'ILs effects?
Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as
YES N0
-^' 21. Change in existing features of any beaches, lakes,
or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours,
. 22. Significant change in scenic views or, vistas from
existing; residential areas or public lands or roads. ti
23. Significantly �,ha.nt e pattern, scale or character of
general„area of project.
�24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter
254 Change' in 'dust, ash, smoke, fumes or. odors, in
vicinity,,
2,6: Significant change in lake, stream or Fround water -
quality or quantity}; or Alteration of exa�;cng drainage
patterns.
27. Substantial change in ecisting noise or vibration'
levels in the vicinity.
28, Site on filled land or, on slope of 30 percent or more,
29. Use or disposal of pot
ettially hazardous materials,
substance's, f” mables or explosives,such as toxic, 1.sm
Appen;� �, - page 2 of 3
#Audid
r;
APPENDIX F
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(To be completed„by Lead Agency)
I. BACKGROUND Log 0 75-11-0601
1. Name of Proponent i`Nicholas.R. Stanley Jr,
2. Address and' Phone Num or o Proponent,i
CC C�i. y 1
a2."LA.4��I-erg,. i ._ � G d p D jscU3
Ora�rj i l e,- C�..� for 7 a 4_S9h 463 Oho aim �.�.eyard
Suit M
Ox (?Val .a1 i forn"a
Date of Checklist Submitted
4. Agency Requiring Checklist
5.- Name;,of Proposal, if applicaTe_ Tent-ative Parcel
Mai
rezone, AP# 26-05--:319_Palermo.
1;
II, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
MOla•n.ations of all "yes" and "maybe” answers are required
on attached sheets-)
YRS 'MAYBE NO
1-• Earth. Will the proposal, result in significant;
.
a. Unstableiearth conditions or in
f�
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, coat -
o.
pactibn or overcovering of the 'soil?
c. Change in topography or ground'sur-
face' relief features or removal of.
topsoil?
, d. Donroftann��un�vuextleolo modifica-
tion ic or
h sical ,
P fe Y
e. Increase in wind or water erosion
of soils, beither on or off thele sit61
i
a f, Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes n'sltaw
tion, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a, river or
stream car the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g, Loss of prime agriculturally pro-
f�~ ductive soils outside designated
urban areas?
Appendix F page
of "9
�Yh..'r'S, MAYBE
—
NO
---
h. Exposure of
p people or property to
geologic h4zards suc�'1 as earthquakes,
landslides mudslides �, ilure
g rounc fa r
1�
or similar hazards?
•
2. Air. Will the proposal result inr'
a. Substantial dtf teri.oration of
-� ambient or lo�a,l ax quality?
;b. The creation of objectionable
odors, smoke or,fumes?
Yui
C. Signirxcant alteration of air
movements, moisture or tempature,
1,
or any change in" climate, ether
'i
locally or regionally?..
3. Water. Will the proposal result in substantial;
a. Ch-anges in currents, or the..course
or direction of water movements?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, .o the rate and amountof
surface water runoff?,
c. Need for off-site surface drainage
improvements, including vegetation
removal, channel.ization ar culvert
sta.11:ation?
"
s ,t Aterations to the course or flow
flood
�df waters?
e Ch4nge in the amount of surface'
;water in any water body?
f, Discharge into surface waters, or
>>} in any alteration of surface
water)f quality, including but riot
limited to temoeratureaddis6olved
oxygen or turbidity?
g. Alteration of the direction-'or
rate of flow of ground waters?
h Change in the quantity or quality
of ;.:ground waters', either through
direct additions o•r withdrawals
or through interception of an;
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
r
APpe T -Page '2 -af 9
1r ,...
Jr YES
MAYBE, NO
i . Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies?
J. Exposure of people or proc�Aty
to water related hazards', --dci }as
flooding?
e
4, Plant'; Life. Will the proposal result
1n su stant�ial:
a, Loss of�.. ,
1 \vegetation or change in the
diversity of
species or number
of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs', grass, crops,
microflora and aquaticplants)?,,,
b., Reduction of the numbers o£ any
unique, rare
or endangered species,.
Of plants?
Introduction of new species of
Plants into
an area, Orrin a barrier
to the normal replenishment: of
existing specie's? °
d. Reduction in acreage of any agri-
cultural crop?
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result
in substantial:
_
a, Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of
any species of
animals (birds, land anim als
includingreptiles, fish and shell-
fish, benthit
organisms;, insects or
microfauna') ?
b. Reduction ofthe numbers of any
unique,' rare or endangered species
of animals?
c;. Introduction of new species of
`yl animals intoan area, or result in
a barrier to the migrat-Qn
o�
movement of animals?
Wei
d• Reduction of, encroachment upon, or
deterioration to existing fish
or,
wildlife habitat?
Appo dix
F page 3 of,.,9
r �
YES MAYBE
NO
6.
noise. Will the proposal result in
atlbstantiaLs'
A . 'Increases in noise 'levels?
b : ' Exposur=e of people to severe noise
Ah
levels?
7.
Li ht and Glare, Will the proposal
produce s gnificant light or glare?
8
Land Use: Will the proposed result
in a significant:
a. Alteration of the planned land use
of an area;, or establish a trend
which, will demonstrably 'lead to such
.
alteration?
b. Conflict with uses _on adjoining.
properties, or confli.et with
establiuhod recreational., educa-
tianal, religi;ots or scientific
uses of an area?
9111i
Natural. Resources. 14111 the. proposal
;
result in substahlldl
a. Demand for,or increase in the rate
of use of any natural resource:?
b; Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
,•.
fJO
_
Risk of Upset : Does the' proposal
invo Ive a risk of an explosion or
the zelease of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, o3'-1,.
pesticides, chemicals or radi anon)
in the event of an accident or upset
a
conditions?
11
Population. will 'the proposal
significantly alter the location,
-
distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an
area or physically divide an
established community?
12,
140 -US : Wall the proposal
signusificantly affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional
housing?
Appendix F -
pale 4, of :.a
Y .J S MAY>3�
1
rra
1.3 Tra.nsportat'ian/Ci.rculation, Will the
proposa. r'L� esult xn:
a, Generation of substantial;' additional
vehicular movement?
b Significant effects on ex"I sti,n.
parking facilities, or demand for
-
new parking?
�f
C. Substantial impact,; -upon existing
transportation systems?
�•'
d6 - Significant alterations to��present
,patterns of circulation or m
;ovement
of people and/or goods?
f •e. Alterations to. waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f. Increase" in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, tricyclists or pedestrians?
14. Public Services
. 11i `1 the proposal. have
HE, effect upon, or result in a substantial
need for new or 'altered governmental
r,} services in any of the following areas:
a, Fire protection?
V
b. Police, protection?•
c, ;,Schools?'
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?°
e, Maintenance of public facilities,`
including roads.?
f. Other•governmental services'?
15. L. 113.11 the proposal result in
a, Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?.
b. Substantial increase in demand upon
f f, existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new
sources of energy?
16. Utilities, Will the 'proposal result
in a need—for ew systems, or subs
statitial: alt'etat ,ons to the following
utilities
Append. F
�- page 5 of 0
YES NiAyt No
- a . Power o � natural gas?
Ask
b. Communications systems?
C dater?
d, Seger (will trun% 'Line be extended
;
providing capacity to serve new
development)?
e. Storm water drainage?
17.
Human
umaneal
Health. Will the proposal
�...
t
a . Creat (5n of any . health. hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)`?
b. Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
18.
Solid Waste. Will the proposal result
in any significant impacts associated
with solid waste d.spo'sal or litter
control?
19.
Aesthetics. Will,the proposal result
1n th-e-65strtiction of any public
designated or ,recognized scenic vista
U
Open to thle public', or will the
proposal result in the creation o£ an
t�
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?.
24,
Recreation, Will the proposal result
in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing p,vbl",c recrea-
tion facilities?
21.
Archeolo Lcal/Historical. Will the
: ...�.:.
proposa resu t in an alteration of
a signi.£icant archeological or
historical'? 1, structure, object'
or bu .lding7
22,
Mandatory Findings :o£ Significance.
a Does the project have the potential
s
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish 'or wildlife
species, cause a..fish or wildlife
} population to drop below self w�
,
,,
-- -- -
— ----_ - _
Appendix F - page '6 of 9
AML
•JJ' �
YIS ` MAYBF N0.
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate' a plant or animal com-
munity, reduce the number of restrict
the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or;eliminate important
examples of the major periods of
Califoznia histor or
y prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potentia]
to achieve short term benefits to
the detriment of publicly adopted
long-term environmental. goals'?
c . Does the: prof ect have impacts which 'j
are individually limited but
cumuilativel.y considerable? (a project
may impact on two or more separate
resources where theAmpact on each
resource is relatively small, but
where the effect of the totalof
those impacts on the etivironment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have environmental `
effects'`Ohich• will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either ,,directly or i:ndi.rectly?
-
,a
E�
Appendix,F
-.,page 7 of a
II
rj
II.I. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL,.EVALUATION
This project is a tentative parcel map;,to create four parcels tnd.a'
rezone from A-2 (General) to AR -MH( -1 (Agricultural. Res°ldential-Mobile
Home 1 acre minimum. lot size)':on AP# 26-05-31, Palermo. The 5.4.5
acre ,,site is located about 660, feet east of Palermo Road (Lincoln
Boulevard) and about 2000 fee`t )north of Messina,, "v= enue. The parcel
sizes_n�
,, being sought by. the land' division are .-follows: parce1 1,S.5
acres; parcel. 2,5 acres parcel 3,1.96 acres: parcel 4,l.J5 acres.
residential 'uses Pa,
-- Parcels 3 and: 4 are presently developed with; res. r-, „
cPl '3 has a m0llehome, welx and pump, -na a pond. Parcel 4 has a . �,
mobilehome, well and pump, and J b,,arn,. Access to parcels 3 and 4 is
primarily from' .E.dwards Drive W14' alp extends north from Messina Avenue.
An O.W:I .D. ditch is located along) the., eastern boundary cif, the pro-
party. The O.W.Y.,,D,. 'ditch serves ;as the source of water for the
fish,,..rond,i,on parcel 3,
The topograkRhy of the land is relatively level on parcels 1 and 2
except along the >easterv, and soutNeastern porttion of parcel—,2 where
the slope varies from,about 1Q-20%. Parcels 3 and 4 have a variable
topography with slopes varying fj om about ,3% -to 20$ . Soils in this,
vicinity include tail :n.gs, Honc t Loam, Redding g *avel,l:y sandy loam
most of the surfaceI. rocks andjcobbles are �rsYcattered over
and 'W man ravel) Large ro ,
Y g y loam, g;
'The 'vegetation in the area is" t,rpzcally`xiparian woodland -ih nature..
Willows, cottonwood, sycamore, Iba1l ey oak; `digger pine, elderberry,
blackberry vines, poison oak, sj�al thistle and various grasses
commonly occur. Areas of ripaf'van vegetation support the greatest,
wildlife densities and diversivies of all terrestrial habitars.�)
f,amall wildlife species are present ;such as squirrels, variousrodents;
snakes, lizards,,., haw'Ks, and songbirds.
Most of thera e
p p rty is bordered by a fence which has been electr-
fled with a low current. One sheep,, four goats and a, cow presently
graze on'',the property. The surrounding land uses include the Butte
County'Horseman Association training arena and Feather River Bucket
Mouthers CB Club to the west, low density and rural`residentaal uses
(mobilehomes o mobilehome 'park; and ,conventional homes) . Wyman �Tlavine
borders the property to the northwest»
The Butte County `General plan designation is low density residential
for:.,this.area• The proposed source,of water is indl�idual wells.
Sewage d:csnpsal would be°by individda'l septic systems»
,,
Appendix' F pago ' 8 of 9
.. _-.Qeuismimsnaomr9+7m71FtI4A1®�NI�I
AML
�,s fes✓ ,.. .,
1(b): ThP�evelopment of two additional residences on
and 2 r ald be accomplished in the sho;�;;- term.- sion!,4ars likely on rho ro,ert_ t Further �l nd�divi-
up�, to ten homosites ,;could be pr�v dedrunder thede �AR�nal .horaesites„
dis osale;ceruPa cels may acf` all be � NtH' l Zone .al
�' g{
g ments, y Possible �n l ht o£ sewage
There is
of the accebseroad a"large pile of dirt and rocks on parcel. l
This material is pla/Ined for .use in the (south
This
line tren:hes among other uses. ��
1(h): This property lies,'within the ''mot ills Shea
eart� yaks. yr Zone of the 1975
�d The potential geologic hazards° frog another major earth-
quake should be taken into account in th// design of future buildings,
3(b):The large parcels of about 2 acres do 5.5 aures
cates that a minor ancxea
increase drainage would result. iVymn7Ravina;r
is the 'natural drainage for this area; the creek lies .
northwest of the site. just to the
30): water related hazards such ass fload
the portion of parcel 1 near the creek W man9 Ravine could be a factor on
main b.uildablo area on parcel 1 is loca�e� so,tath of the However, the
and further away from the creekbank access road
5(c),' The AR-MH,.1 zone would al
to„Nr livestoc t to be raise
ont'he prem:��ses subject to lot a*•.ea d Or kept
swine, sheep or goats can be kept irsfficentlotrarea5,xscaVt�e,
ail..
able in addition to the minimum required for residential use
5(d)The riparian vegetation should be preserved intact
n the portions of the property rae�a..rest to, Wymanarrane.
o , particular
81 (a) ttie land The proposed "zoning° should be com atible
i"ly In the,surroundin&"area, most of which axe under with tonin uses;
AR -MH -1 none would a119w the following uses; g The
1111) One single-family dwelling per parcel.
4) One'mobilehome as the dwelliing unit on an one
4 v
3;) Accessory.build to allowed uses.
4) Agricultural uses. �' parrs
5) Raising and keeping livestock sub
aect to lot area requirements:;
All of those allowed uses under the AR-MH_Y zone
swine degree in the vicinity. Other `potential usesrsuchtas Bares occur to
J tock
farming and nurseries would' be subject to securing a use permit.
1=n the short-term, the establishment of ttfo residences would
r trips per day to Lincoln 'Boulev
Parcels,, 1`and 2 were fur and
Add reboot E;�12 to l4 veh�cula
day would be added to thehlocalvtrafficbcot S6 vehicular trips ,per
t£
based on 8 homesite,s on the 1o.5 total acres.
Thirs estimate is
Appendix' R _ page 8a o£ 9;;
t
The acces-'toad from Lincoln Boulevard to parcels 1 and 2"
should be up,graded;to a two -iva traversable standard. Pwesen'tly,
this roadway is dirt and sawdust in many playas` making-
to traveir',';e when tlie groundis wet. it difficult
Access to parcels ? and a, .; mainly by way of Edwards Drive, a road
extending north frcm Messina Avenue.
y.4 (a-f) : The pro joct' Would cause a minor increase in demand for
pj.blic services. j1ire protection is `'available from the P a imo Fire
Station. Police pi�otec�tion is available from the Butte County Shexi£f's
jbepartmen`t. PalerAo School on Mely ns Avenue is available for ele--
mentary grade chi.lAren.
L �l
16 (61,, (d,) : All o� the parcels require clearance from ,..the EnvironmentalHealth Department tor individual wells and septic systems. Soil, data
(soil depth tests And/or soil percolation tests) may be required for
parcels ,1 and 2 to jjdetermine the feasibility of sep{.c systems,, particu-
larly if further lel�nd divisions are proposed in the future.
21: There are no recorded archaeological sites in this vicinity. The,
tailings along Wyman Ravine near the project site,ndcate low like-
lihood of significant cultural resources bei.n T£ cultural
P present.
r"esources are unearthed during development of the parcels, an archaeolo-
gist-should be contacted immediately.F \
Suggested _Mitigation Measures fox the tentative parcel map 'axe
discussed under items 1h, 5d, 13c and 21,,,
1
t�
,
li Appendix F - ,page 6b of �9 f�
APPENDIX 'C7
o
NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING E WIRONMENTAL .111ACT
1.
NOTICE .IS HEREBY GIVEN tha'C the pro j ect described: }below has
been reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the bailifornia
Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public ResouVGes Code
211001 .et Leq.), and a determination has bedn made that it will
not have a significant effect upon the environment.',
2.
• Log #.,'8
-11-06„01
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Tentative parcel map to create four parcels`on APS 26«05.31. j
3.
LOCATION OF PROJECT:
Located about 600 feet east of Palermo.,Road (-Lincoln toulevard)
and about 200 feet north of Pdessina avenue,, Palermo.
4.
NAME AND ADDRE a OF PROJECT APPLICANT:
Nicholas R. Stanley Jr.
2345 Stanley Drive
Orovillet California 95965 •
5.
MITIGATION ME.ABURES :
,a
�L-6-.
.A. copy of the Envivronmental: Review Director's initial steady
regarding the env'ironLental effect of this project is- attached.
This study was
Adopted as presented._
Adopted with ,ohanges. Specific modifications and ,
supporting reasons are attached., °
,
7'.
A, public hearing on this Negative, Declaration-was ]veld by the
decision making- body.
Nearing body But"te County AdvisoryAgency
Date of Determination Marchi 5, 1979
betermination
On the basis of the Envi,rosmental Director's initial study.
the information prssented at hearings, comments received on the
Proposal and our own knov'tledge and indepmadent i�esearoh:
-- -
- - -- Appendix] G page 1 of 2
4
BUTTE COUNTY ADVISORY AGENCY page 6
MxriUTES _ March 5, 1979
79-127J.-(241)
Jr AP 26-05-31s four parceis "east, end of Stanley
11.1 Nicholas S+�n1eS*. Driscoll & Associates.
' Dri�Palezmo area. �ty91neer• Geddis,
s a change in. the amended map.
Mr. Mendansa me
nt lone d th
at there wa
Healt
Mr. Bill Geddis said that the reason was to conform acto to,th®leachheDeaaonmen'�
requirements. He sa;.d, "We had to work out a sa s z`�*
Parcels 3 and 4.10
Mr. Reid .asked:, "All
those Hells shown are existing wells?'
Mr. ',Geddis replied "Yes."' r '
Mr, Geddis mentioned that Bettye Blair had noted
nthe AP the ag! (tontheg:w.esbu' the
Report that a piece of property was shown o page
title report didn't include this piece.
Mr. Mendonsa said, 'We will 11 conditioesthat
b'el ng toothe"property'-n of the Pbe shownroerty as
on the AP page to the west --if it d
part of Parcel 1."
Mry Stem Streeter mentioned that the references tnTheeapplicanth
ase ithdrawfi
mental Review Checklist are no longer applicab
the application for rezone.
teral
Mx Geddis said that there was never a problem with the Boardng -the Gle
o£ SupErvigorsphad•
This property just got ,caught• in °the area where
"areas should be rezoned.
decided that A-2 zoned
N[r. Reid stated; Havi:�g' reviewed the,En
oftol pronmeptal impactrls
I will make,a motion to adopt a negative declarationAP noting
fort the Nicholas, 5Canle ^� Jr. Pareeto theoButtenCountyrizo"ring and�is3in con£ot-
that the protect is int,;,cou ormanc
' P4 f the
° P ,have a significant effect on the environment.
w� 1l not g
mance to the Butte Cau1.t" General Plana -asp '
-par the owner's state usa e o
propert,� .and
Motion seconded by
Mr. Hironimus and carried unanimously.
Mr Reid followed Frith a motion to approve the tentative map of Nicholas Stanley,
Jr. ontanlay Drive, AP 26-05-31.) noting that a negative declaration eras
adopted this date: and subject to the folio*.ring conditions
Air r1e roa� around eXioGL^.o lig1�,5
100-f t. leadhf
the property or wi,t1lir, loo feet 01 the prO, er' j • _
t +s -f r; 1e3chfield setaec'�: from the 93nd 1~caae3 or Parcel 3•
2. Sho
fir e _0 i,
Verify jep'_ 1 AvCE88 .
o each parcel froom a
44 provide 2 -way traversable accessu
eoun t;i me�.n,�anedstate highway.
' or g
rr
(, nditi�sns March 5, 19749,
ca coritinAed on ne?ct page)
BUTTE COUNTY ADVISORY AGE140X
MINUTES -w March. 5, 1979 Page 1
5. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinanoe aril ol:fsred
for dedication on the fins: map'
6'. Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from centerline of access
easement. :.
7.. Provide road maintenance agreement. 1�
8.. Show all,easements of record on the final map.
g. Prov:.de street name signs per regtiirements of the J)epartment of
Public Works prior to recordation of `the Final Ln.=gyp,
10i Provide permanent solution for drainage.
rr _
11. Segregate or pay off any assessments.
12. Provide cul-de-sac at the end of the streEC.
13. Obtain encroachment permit and construct standard road apaoach
providing adequate sight distance.
14. Pay any delinquent taxes, /
r;
15. The partion, of property 5ho,;m on AP page 26-05 that eftends to
M, Lincoln Boulevard as shown on the .P2 page--ifi y , s ;indeed a perticn
of the pro. erty--shauld be ,added to the final, msp and made a cart of
Parcel. .1.
Mr. Bill Goddi.s asked about conditioh. #8 regarding providing permanent solution
far drainage. (See letter dated February 22, 1979) 1
Mr. Mendonsa said, '�We are only talking about the two parcels where alL� he,,
buildings are now, It's only for parcels that are 3 acres and under."
Motion secondedby Mr. Mendonsa' and carried unanimously,
19-32-14369)
19-12-1-010)
I
Since Mr..Gordon Shields had arrtved, the committee decided to review Vince
,.� iloble' Tentative _Subai-t l Sion' at this time.
Xr. Mendonsa said, "At this -time, I might note that the drainage s•4ale going
through there should be shown as an easement --not as a'fee title strip."
Mr. Reid had a revised map which the other committee members did not have a
copy of, (dated January l6, 7979) This revised map would be the one to, be
acted` on,,
Explanattan of 'revised map.
fir. Steve Streeter mentioned that the only mittgatlon measures wi11 be the
conditions of approval:
March 5, 1919
NOTICE Or.,.DETERMINATION 'E
1.2 IY9
TO /7 Secretary for Resources
1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 CLAMAo MOON, M Cleek
Sacramento, CA 95814
DePOY
LV County Cllyrk
County, o��,, Butte FROM.: (Lead ' )
Agency _
1859 Bird "'Street Count of Butte
Oro.viile; California 95965 Environmental Review pepartmeri
. # 18.-F County Center,. Drive
Orovillg «. W.fotnia _9596`5
SUBJECT: Tiling bf Notice of_'Determination in Compliance with
Section 21108 or 21152 of the Pubic Resources Code
Log # 78-11-06-01 _ 1
This is to advise, that the Butte Count
Lea Agency
has made the-f6llowing determinations regarding the ,-above-described-
w..
profit
1. The project --7 W-11111 have a significant effect on, the
will not
environment.
h
2 /% An Enviro'nmenta7. Impact Report was prep red for this ,project
pursuant to the, protiisions of CE!�A; and was certified as
required by 'Section 15085(g), 14 California Administrative
Code,
/ A t�fagative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuan
to the provisions of CEOA A copy of the, Negative Declara_
tioxi maybe, examined at the Environmental. Review Department,
7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California 95965.
3. L7 A Notice of 'Exemption was filed `indicating this project i,s
exempt from environmental,review.'
1 Appendix H page 1 of .2
rod ect Title
Tentative Parcel Ma AP# 26-05-31 Nicholas R. Stanle ',;Jr
State C earinghouse Number 1. submitted to State Clearing House
ontaet Person Telephone Num er
Earl D. Nelson, Director . , 916 534-4777
Project Location -' Eocai�e�'�ut 600 feet east of Palermo Road (Lincol
Boulevards and about 20,1 ,feet north of .Messina Avenue Palermo.
,
Proect Description;
Tentative Parcel Map creating four -,parcels,
'-- Advisor Agency,,