HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT. 79-62 1rr ra... .yw. �i ��in+M' Asp ur. ..y �wN�'. s.t.:� eaKif11M pM TwM nWi� m..r W v+,! V^a: �. ar .4,r �,�... W Y.WI �>. aw:• .y. ewes M +W! rswloo
B" cou*; '
i
„
,
w' 9 . _. .. ... - , .� -, ','M r _ e, -y ,. .. .. a.0 •.•.: r. _..:- .. ., .; y._ ...y ,_.. ... � -. ,,. '••,.?�*:+ r' "N h d.,. .� ,
a.. .. s .. .. .. k v. K E ,. ... ...,. ...._ ... :.... «., ,...rte ,
{ ..,. 1. � , .. i. ,.. • .. 1 r .,
, e
»"fin y .� .t. .: :,. --. �. 'i. .. �. .' :. �. ,� ,•, ,:. '. .. . .' �...'.. ,
i
W
l , _.. _ v � r. ... .. ,., a ..: i.. Y -.r .. ,.: ,... ,:.. ... ., ..'' - •. ,•.
Vit. .. � .. .. _.... .. �, _.i .. .....
r
3 x:
n �m a
7,1
w. _.
a
,-;. 'r ,' ,. .,fir... .. � w- .'. [ .. .� :. ,. � �' a ,.• �. .. Y�. 7. .,.. �,
44
,
. � � t. ♦ yam. ,,_ .. ,. i. ... 1 (+. .. � � ., � .,.� � J t. : '.:� _ » � x:r .1 :: .f - � ,i ).�
7 is
14,
-7F-7,
>i
im
.. „.Y>-....' .... .. .e
66-�
211
l Ile
.
n i �:,..'G
�.
... _ ,. , ..,'. ;. .� ..�o 1. .� �. ,'. •. � :. .. w..,, ,.g. -.n e'�e .. r,,:�
r
F d i'h ti{ 15 tVf{^ t'1'X'71
'i
ci��i'Y•eta+&'iJW`Mi's,.'lly:.�
rai n ��f 1 +< r t, (Ike
1 .'t • - _i 1 ty - e �r {yd ftree •✓ r C r*� L�+ y -. te.o%x 'N -
'� AIAJ
�'c':tr :.
li
d t
i.V_,,�!
,
I � l
•r T !;
n J •�
.A:
, S
d { I
. rx
i
f�
n + ,r
Jn { r u a p
APPENDIXr ,�
X11 6. if residentrial•, ane Wde the n,,.111+laer of, units, sobadule of un t
sizes ,' ani type of household size expected. V/� �7
17, if commercial., indicate the �^ypc, whether neighbaat~bood, city
or regionally oriented, square f ool.a e of sales area, and loading
facilities.
18. � j LyPO_,, ym per shift,
andloadin facila ties , . .,✓
If �.ndus t*ra.al;; indicate t t�` os t_ima,t;ed etn ala, c.�1 t,;
19. If institutional, indicate 1;i"!c major function,, est.,[T ated
employment per shift, cst~imated occ;tipancy; loading fa.ci.l,i tied,
and community benefits, to be derive -"(,I fromt.he project, '
20., if the project involves a varivance, conditional use or rezoning
applicat=ion, state this sn� indicate clearly why the application #s
required. 7 4� 1��,e. c as �,
J
Are the folloOin; items applicable to the project or its effects?
Discuss below all items checked yps (attach additional sheets as
necessary).
YES N0,
21 Change in existing features of any beaches lakes,
or hills; or substa.ntl gal alteration of round contours.
22, Sig nific ant chanjjj a in scenic views n or vistas from
existing residential; areas or ,puhl:ic lands or roads.
23 Sig nifiaantl:y change pattLsrn j stale or character of
general area of project.
M 24= 5i nificant- amounts of solid waste or litter.
25. Change in dust, a.sh, smoke, fumes or odors in
%,ic1,1ity ,
1/ 26. Significant change in lake, stream or ground water
quality or quantity, ' or aIterati.on of existing drainage
patterns.
27. Substantial 'change in existing, noise or vibration.
levels in the -vicinity.
28. Site on filled land or on slope of 30 percent or more.
29.- Use or disposal of potentially haza,dous materials, `.
such as toxic substances, flatmables or explosives.
t
I,, ,Appendix F page 2 of 3
it_....,_.�:• .�,.��
YES MAYBE Na
h. Exposure of papple or property to
as earthquakes ,
geologic hazards such
landslides, In-Idslid.es , ground failure,
AQh
WE
orsimilar hazards'? M
2. Air:, Will the proposal result in.
Substantial deterioration of
a.
ambient or local air quality? --
b. The creation of objectionable
�.
odors, smokeor fumes?'. _..
C, .Si.gnificant alteration of air u
- movement, moisture or tempature,
change in climate,, either
or any
locally or regionally? --
3, Water, Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Changes in currents, or the course
direction of water movements?
or
b. Changes iz, absorption rates, drainage
amount of
patterns,, or the rate and
surface water runoff?
c, deed for off =site surface drainage
improvemen.ts'�, including vegetation ;
removal., channelizat:ion or culvert' „
installa'tiot ?
Alterationsto the course or flow
of flood waters?
e .. Change in the amount of surface
water in any waiver bodji -
f: Discharge into surface waters, or
surface'
in any alteration of
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
o%ygenor turbidity?
Altertion ;sof the direction or
rate Of flow 01f ground watexs`?
h. Change in the quantity or quality
through
of ground waters, either
withdrawals,),
direct additions or
or through; interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
Appendix E page
2 of 9
YES MAYBE NO
i, Reduction in 'the amount of water
otherwise available for
= public
water su Ines?
Pp
J Ex1posure of people or
P Property
to water related hazards such
as
flooding?
}, Plant Life. Will theosaro `
- in substantial € p P 1 result,
c
a Loss of vegetatLon or change in the
diversity of
species or number
of any species of plains (including
trees, shrubs, grass, c:40ps,
microflora ,and aquatic plants)?
b, Reduction of'the numbers of any
unique, tars or endangered species
of
.61ants?,
C. Introduction of new species of
plants'onto
an area, or in a barrier
to the normal replenishment of
exi ting; specie's?
d, , Reduction in acreage
cultural. crop?' of any agri-
cultural
t�
5. Animal _Life, Will the proposal result
in substantial:
bstantial;
a. Change in the diversity of species
or numbers or
any,. Species of
animals '(birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell-
fish, benthic
orpani.sms, insects or
microfauna)
b. Deduction of the cumbers of any,
unique, rareror endangered species'
of animals?
c• Introduction of new species of
animals into an area, or result* -n
a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals?
d. Reduction of, encroachment upon, or
deterioration
to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
Appendix F
- page 3 of
1 ..
YES MAYBE
140
6.
Noise. Will the, proposal result in
substantial:
a, Increases in noise levels?
b. 8xposure of people to severe noise
levels?
7,
Light and blare. Will the proposal
-pro-ducee l - meant light or glare?
S.
Land Use. Will the proposed result
in a significant:
,a.,, Alteration of the planned, land use
of an area, or establish a,trend
,WhiOh will, demonstrably lead to such
j
alteration? ...
b. Conflict with uses on adjo+-,Lning
properties, or conflict with
-
established recredtional,, duca-
t.ional. religious or 8 le��ltiflQ
1,
^ -
:uses of an area?
V
9.
Natural Resources, Will the proposal
resul.,t in substantial.r
a . DeriSand for, or increase in the rate
of use of any natural resources'?
b, Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
10,
Risk :of Upset: Does the pro osal
involve a risk of an explosion or
the release of hazardous substances
(inc7ud1 , but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation,
in the event of an accident or upset.
(,ondibions ?
ll.
Population, Will the proposal
sign i� cantly alter the location,
_
distribution, dens t ty, or growth
rate of the human, population of an
area or ph�ysioally' divide, an
established community'?
12.
Tiusing . Wi:ll the proposal,
+
slpnCan`t1y affect existing hausng,
or create a demand for additional
housing?
Am
.: Appendix F
- page 4'� of y
YES MAYBE
,. NO
13.
T�rans ortation/Circulation:.. Will the
proposal tesU(t in:
a Generation of substantial 'additionalAft�
vehicular movement?
----
b. S nificant effect's o 1
"' � existing
rl
parking..iae,ilities, or demand for
new parking? "
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems:?
d. Significant alterations,, to present
patterns of circulatior`or movement
of people and/or_goods?
e, Alterations, to waterborne; rail or
air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic'hazards to tnotor
vehicles, 'bicyclists-or pedestrians?
14.
Publ e Services i Will the r
. p oPo,..sal have,
an e ect upon., or, result in a sub, anti
need for ftew`or, sltc:red governmental
services in any of the following areas=r
a.. Fine protection?
b. Police protection?
c. j'` chools?
d. Parks or other recres.tiona7,
facilities?
P" ' Maintenance of public ' facilities,
including roads:
f. Other governmental services?
.
15,
Energy. Will the proposal result in,:
�
a, Use of substantial amounts of fuel:
or energy?
b. :Substantial increase in demand upon;
existing_ sources of energy; or
require the development of new
sources of energy?
t6.
Utilities' , Will the pt-opo;sal result
in a�. tee 1'for new, systems, or sub-,
„
stanti a1 alterations to the following
utilities
t,
-,Appendix
F'
page 5-of 9
1
0
_
r
YTS MAYBE N0
a. Power of natural gas?'
*C,
y
-b. Communications systems'?
C+
c . Water?'
61
,.
d. Sewer w: 11 trunk line be extended`'
providing capacity to serve new '
development)?
ANIL
e. Storm'water drainage?
17,
Human Health, : Will ,the proposal
�
resu1T-16-n- i
a. Creation of any health, hazard or ..
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health) ? <.
E, -
b. Exposure of people_to potential
health hazards?
r>
t
I' 18,
Solid Waste. , Will the proposal result
in any significant impacts associated
with solid waste diGposal."or litter
control?-
ontrol?19.
19.1
Aesthetics`. 14ill " the propoS4 result
n t a
o s truction of any public
cdesignated or recognized scenic vista
open to the public, ,or w..11 the
proposal result in the creation of an
Kesthetically
,.
offensive site open to
public view?
Alk
20.
Recreation, Will t17epi6posal result
in an impact upon the quality of
quuant ty"of existing public recrea,
tion facilitips?
o'cal /His taiicaWill the21 Arce-oh
proposaresu t nana teration1 iof
a significant archeological OI'
a
historiCalsite;' strut tire Object
'
a
or building!
22>,
mandatoryFindings of Significance
a, Does the project =have °the pu,..antial
4
to degrade the quality of the
,
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
,spec- es, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self`
J
:..... _,.,,
w - ��e� o
Appendix ,�'
pe pad r
AWL
Y MAYBE
NO
sias taining levels threaten to
eliminate ;a plant or animal com-
munity, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a" rare or eridangerecl
plant or ai'::mal or eliminate important
example's of the major periods of
California history or prehis'�ory.
b.
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short term ber.'efits to
the detriment of-pijblYicly adopted
long-term environmental 'goals?
c,
Does the project. Have impacts which
„
are individually limited, but
cumulativelv., cons iderably.*%-° (a project
may impact a�� 1,4o or more separate
resources where the impact on each
resource is relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of -
I;
those impacts on the environment Is
j`
significant;,.
d,
Does the project have envirr) mental
\;
effects which will cause substantial..
adverse effects on human beings',
either directly or indirectly?
;;
appendix E
- page7 of 9
APplicant; ''Lo
rx'a Wis
aaesf"I0'r's Parcel �` Il -
DISC
SCtTSSI'Q' . 1rT317' Lo _1626 1$
A Pro, eco T) F �f 7.8_12-08-n1
�•Type of Projoct Tentative Parcel Ma Annexation
2. Dri'e, ,DeScrl iOn: Div�s� and Subdivision,
�Qn a5 i11t0 t}lr�n
-----� to- th r�arcels anneXation
U .the CYt of Cr
idle and de---y�?ment of a 115' 7arcel
�3 Location subdi
• On r vision.
north o the „ Gxi d o f the�i�
----- ey s'1 r a d' a c e n t_ t_oa,d
le Co]tisa Hi hwa about milo
leRoad ,west of West 13 kgs ,
Road.
Proposed Dons l,;y off'' vr,l.ppment: Ultimately a 115 -un`
Aruottl�G0i'mpeY�iot�w Surf a zt subdivision,
and Nearest public Tdoad r tYPical for 1/4 -acre lets.
• Yidle-Colus,a �}i t�way(Sycamoxo
Street)_ fronts nr pert
> ' Gr
�• „Method
. o�S. Sozrc�e o1Sewage TWpo'sa`L:
Individual se � tics —r idley sewex.Water SUPI.y:Tndividual
9• ProXi,mity Of Poorwells and Cridle ' e r Ad'acent water.,
10. Potent"a' f .__
Or tur-ther land divis" ��1� devel.o Iilf? ,
be further divided wh p nid •-The ,3 .parcels can
is the ultimate ob ',ecti re
B• En vionmea� ted Se�t4in
l?t�Yci.cal Fnvironmont ,
General Topographic Chara.cter.# P') at almost le li
vc.1_,
b. Kopec:
Less`''than ]% towards the sound Sou
---------------
r El CSvdJ on
d+ La mit izz Fact
ra Types and Characteristic
'Con loam contain`
._._ Y n a fine sandy
_
loam surface soil and a subsoil `of loam-sandoam
-cla,
and nPrha s Y loam,
-a— ra a a t dee e le e l s
h • Limiting Factors:
NoneCnowiz of.
Natural Hazards of the Land ;
a. Earthquake Zone Low `hatdrd
h: Erasion Poten,tial: Loci ---
d. Fare Hazard,: Low
c Landslide Potential: None
e• EDT an sive Soil Potential.
4.; Hydrology r � Low=Moderate
aurfaoe Water; A 31
and the Sutter Butte Canaljl�i Latera t e site
of the site several' 8 lies east
` r idx et4page 7a of
9
}'� G� etc �n /ry yn { y� '(
]Dorn ussion CoY�tinue�7.P (I
b.. Ground Ground Wt;Gr: Abundant valley aquifers, shallow to de levels,
c. D:06inage Chnvara`t;eristic.s: Drainage channel tr��verses r
east to west, crossing the groposed access dri-,yowaY. '
d. Annual Rainfall (normal:) :'20 inches
e. Limiting Faatorh : None
vi suai/Sconir Quality-Agricultural -Urban transitional area.
Acoue t.i,e quality: Fair-Urban. area and mai or rmd •Ajdi aceat
;1
rl
Air Qual, `i:, : Good. Tunical ua 7 1 �v—a_i_r qua 1 i tv irnl� nmS.,
Y. iologdoal Rgivironmenti ;
8-
ve O t.a't;i. on The s.1'_.e? �.a rL`.rc3- t4i th n'r�iiarri 7nrl i
_ rri craYnri ri sfi1 �,r
surrounding site, as well as developing urban residential area.
9.
Wildlif6 Habitat o TXyictifor nrchnrd i antis "its " :'i7'► art-han rc�^
10.
Areliaool_ogrical, and Hi.stfovic;al Resources in the a::�oao—None recorded
in the area. A' ea is not a sensitive archaeolo�ical_re�io
_ n,
11.
Butte County Goneral. Plan desi.pia'ti.o.n' Low densil
1-4 dwelling units per acre. G
?..
Exi.oting Zoning; A-2 Generat.
131
Existing st� in Laird
�JJo ora,..i;te°Ag ul
xx.c tuxal-prune orc}jard.
'1
Suvrounding Area
41. Land Uses.' Agricultural prOdominantly, particularly to the west,
north and east, '1'o the south is' urban residential.
bP Zdni.a A-2 general; City of Gridley` I2-3 to the south.
04, Gen: Plan deoignaUon;z; : Urban. Agrjc'r1 tura'1 within 1/2.m'jJe to
west and north, City of Gri die)r -Agii cultural and low densit res id-
d. 'Parcel Size: 'Various: 1/3 to 9 .
/ 1 ac 1/ to 9 ac
o. Papul'tion Develop in ty. Urb a it 13ux� tes.�,slentj j
GJaarael or of S to aria re :AgrimiltUral-UrbanAransitional area.
SIE .
Nenrost 'Urban Area:, Within Gridley Urban. Area.
Rol. event; Spheres of lnxluence: is just with .ri the City of
Gridley sphere. of influence Gridley city li'lints are adi acent to site
IS,
liftprovomentk", Standards Urban Area Within Gri;cl" ley UrbanAxea.
19.
Fire Protection Sorvi.c.e;
ao Nearest County (Mate) Fire Stmt iox: J-1/4 mile ��ICiiyy siratiorr nearer),
U, Water Avai.labi.lit),r? Wells. c'it o� Lyxidle tr on annextion
Q.
Schdo�.s ixx Ari; Gridley-schoc�7 s relatively near.
71w11fde1f111.�1i7fi1 f
A}y 7^tendix F-page 7bof
.... ...: flliiQf®�IIa1�FtlQl11D�111.�i.fr.-.. .. ;'.-• • "_ 'I 4,.
111. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUAT;TON
This proposal is a land division to create three parcels
lof 2.30 6±, and 3"0± acres in area For residential use.
The 37± acre property is located in the western periphery
of the Gridley urbanized area adjacent to and north of
the; Gridley-Colus:a highway. Subsequently, proposed'
parcels 2 F, 3 will be considered for annexation to the
City of Gridley. Subsequent to that, A. 115 -unit sub-
division has been proposed on the 30 -acre parcel, to the
City of Gridley upon finalization of the annexation.
The City of Gridley has recommended an EIR for the sub-
divisionf-..development based on the growth inducing impacts
and traf'...Ac impacts of the proposal (see attached City
of Gridley environmental evaluation checklist)
Since these three projects are interrelated and are different
phases of the sub -division development, a single environmental
impact report is necessary, covering the entire overall
development s`cluence, including each phase (parcel map,
annexation, subdivision). Each project phase is a necessary
J precedent -For action on the larger project; the 115 -unit
ubdivision, which is the ultimate goal.. The impacts ident-
ified on the checklist include:
1. Trafflc and traffic -related impacts (noise) reduction
in air quality, area circulation, etc.)
2. urban expansion and population growth.
3. Increased demand for and expansion of public services
t,. and utility facilities,
4. increased energy use.
S. Reduction of agriculturally productive soils and an
orchard for agricultural use (37 acres),
6" Increased drainage`l from soil covering by _impervious
surfacing;
7. Potential, incompatibilities with adjacent agricultural
uses
Appendix F page 3 of 9
, F
r,
.. . -
11
Z
TV. DETERMINATION
(To
be completed by the Lead Agency)
On
the basks of this initial evaluation;
0
1 find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLA7ATION
,i,s rc c6mmended.
0
1 find.that although the proposed project could have, a
significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
IS RECOMMENDED.
Ifind the proposed project MAY have a significant
effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is required.
;
Date-Ap,ril 12 0 19.79'p(-66/UJ A
(Signature')
For: 901RQNMENTAL REVIEW Dl PARTMI'FNT
Reviewed b Z'� J
1°`
Bar! D . Nell oh
Enviromtental Review Director
Appendix F'- page 9, of '9 '
i
r j NLY
Recei
- roj eat
NDX E iV, ��5
Date' Filed ,/� ;,� HV
Erivirobmental ift ormation ' Form
(To he completed by applicant)
GENERATE
INFORMATION
1:' Name and address of developer or project sponsor-,'.'�w �. 3
2. Address of project: u
s - Number
.Assessor Block and Lot
3. Nameaddress, and telephone nurgber of person to be contacted
concernin#-, this project.
4. Tyke afro j ecFt : i.e. rezoning; subdivision)
5, List and.describ"e any other related permits and other public
approvals required for this project:, including those required
agencies:
bycity regional, state a d`ede1al
a �
�
b, Existing ,zoning district:
7. Ptopo'sed use of site, ,✓ M"`` r r y
PROJECT DESC,PTPTTON
8. Site size
�?YfrpdRlo� fad.
� Ra vlow
9. Square rootage of buildin s �. p®pf.
D,
10» Dumber of floats of construction. �.µ�� �
1978
Adfa
11. Amount of off-street parking,provided. .s ,` u
12 , Attach site development', plAn. IL,
4.
13. Proposed scheduling. t",
s. I
14`, Associated projects. ~ v ,• ...
15. Anticpat^ed incremental development. A
1
Appendix Eg
pae 1 of '3
,. q
APPENDI' IIX E k
a
jp
16, If 'residential, include, the number of units sch0dule of unit
sizes, and type of household size expected. 4�,*
commercial, indicate, the type, whet -her" neighborhood, city
or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area,a7d ltaadinp,
facilities.
8. 1f 'industrial, iridic to type, estimated 'empl
ando}�rnen�' per shut,
l.oadittg facilities,
19. If institutional, indicate the major function, eStimated
employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading faci.li ies,
and communis
community benefits to be derived fromLhe project.
20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use orl
rezoning,
application., state this and indicate clearly why the appl,�cation i,s.
required, 11're V- .moi r ,. , � . ar +'!Y , ;. �i {
Are the following items applicable to the project or Its effects?
Discuss ,below all items checked yes (attach addition al Sheets as
necessary)
YDS
No.
�
21. Change in exi.sti.ng features of any beaches,` lakes,'
or
,hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours,
22. „Significant change in scenic views or vistas from
existing zesidontial area, or public lands or roads
23Significantly change pal tern,
scale or character; of
7--- general area of project.w
24'. , Si•gnlfican.t amounts of solid waste l4or litter',
25. Change in dust, ash, smoke., fumes or odors in
-- vicinity,
26 • Significant, change in Lake., steam or ground water
quality Or quant'ltyy, or alteration of existing drainage
patterns !1
27. Substantial c -range in existing noise or vibration
levels in thd-- rici pity ;
2;3 Site
/n filled land or on slope of 30 .percent ormore,
29. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous mater'i.als,
such as toxic substances,lammbles or explosives.
a
A pendia 4 - "page 2 of 3
-
Ask
•
YES NO
r 30 , substantial change in d��m,and for municipal sOrvicesr,
_ - (police,fire, water, sewage, etc.)
.., .
nwuxnption
31, sub'staptia]ly in.crease fossil fuel 00
(electricity, Oil, n�iural gas , etc.),
• -
32. Relationship tri part of. a larger pjj oject or"series;
-�..� of projects.
TINq
33 puscribe, thy' projeci- site as it existJs befog e �ol�nts and
�nclu arig information on topography, soil -stake litY, p ]scenic aDescxibe
an�.na7.s, And. any cultural., histsatE�anc� �heuseo��the•s
anytructureR`
ex�.sLa,ng' rut.�tures on the
ro er�esr 3.ilcludang>information
3 Describe the surrounding p p
ants and aniTAAls and any cultural, l .s � �mmprc oricai riscetcc) sp c >a .
on ill e Of Jared use (residential, Indicate the typ a atial,t houses,a�haps, department
tensa Ly of lard ,�xse (one-fama lyr - ,7b Ix,
storas, etc.), and scale of developm,nt
(height, frontage, sc7.ao
rear yard, etc.)-
'1CI-xTION: x herebY certify than the statemey7ts furnished',
ion
.., .. red
;abo'•�re and in the attached e:�cha.b"its �prto�tlietbesthe ar,f mydab�l.��.ys.tan�i
requirca for the s initial evaluation
that the fae;ts, state%Onts, and infoxi�ation presented are true and
correct to the best Of' my knowledge and belief, r,
.yrs,
�..
bate C '2.-" 7- � � ; (Sa.gnuture
Vor.� .
Appendix E page 3 of.3
. ... .__� erclrlieQAllf1� i I
tLeaa Pgency)
has made the ;Following determinations regarding the above-desdribed ,
project;
,;.
1.
Th'proa ect have a sig nificant effect on the
Will
XX
wtl l not
environment. 0
2. / / An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for thl.8
Droj ecC
pursuant to the provipior s of CEOA, and was `�certifi;edas
required by Section 1,5035 0;} 14 California Admini s trative
Coda
/% A Negative Declaration was prepared for Chis,'arb, ject pursuant
to" the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Neg7itive Declara
tiot may be exami_rted at the Environmental Rwiieca Department,
7 County Center Drive, Oroville; Cali.fo;.ni:,a. ��§5965.
3. /7' A Notice of 'Exemption was, filed indicating"this project is
exempt from envi.ronmenta,7. review.
4—If P �A, Appendix H - page 1, of 2
NOTICE nF DETERMINATION
FILED,
TO€ /7 Secretary .for Resources
-"
APR 1980
141.6 Ninth Street, Room
1311
r CA 95814
aft
CLARK
CLARK A. NEUON, Comy, Clerk
ontact� Person
�OODSD1a ao(J�
% fy
//XT County Clerk
Earl Nelson, Environmental. Review Director
County of Butte
FROM: (Lead Agency) Butte courity
��
County Center�Drive
Local Azency .TormatZon Commission,
x
Orovllle,,CA 2.5965
7 County Cori-Fer Drive
roject Descriptions
Oroville,, CA 95965 .. _,...�.
_
Tentative Subdivision, 37,,+ acres
SUBJECT; Filingof Notice of Determination in Compli.ap epwith
21.108 or 2:l
SeCt�.152
of the Public Resources"OOMN, Raviaw Dopt.
Coun+Local: y AcFormation Co
y.y. , mmission
1;P;� 1980
ERD Log 7$-12-08-01
tLeaa Pgency)
has made the ;Following determinations regarding the above-desdribed ,
project;
,;.
1.
Th'proa ect have a sig nificant effect on the
Will
XX
wtl l not
environment. 0
2. / / An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for thl.8
Droj ecC
pursuant to the provipior s of CEOA, and was `�certifi;edas
required by Section 1,5035 0;} 14 California Admini s trative
Coda
/% A Negative Declaration was prepared for Chis,'arb, ject pursuant
to" the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Neg7itive Declara
tiot may be exami_rted at the Environmental Rwiieca Department,
7 County Center Drive, Oroville; Cali.fo;.ni:,a. ��§5965.
3. /7' A Notice of 'Exemption was, filed indicating"this project is
exempt from envi.ronmenta,7. review.
4—If P �A, Appendix H - page 1, of 2
Annexatibn Ban, Ranch%Subdivision _ AP
022 -26 -o -0.1R-0 .
, t�i;�or
tate .0 earingh,ouse Number-(-Ifsubmitted
to State
C eearino Mous
ontact� Person
1e. e�
one NUM er
Earl Nelson, Environmental. Review Director
ro j ect; Location
S.W. 34 of" the S.E;.1/4 of Sec. 35, T18N,
PH adjacgnt Grie?l ey Colusa Hi hwa .
roject Descriptions
_
Tentative Subdivision, 37,,+ acres
This is +;O advise that the Butte
Coun+Local: y AcFormation Co
y.y. , mmission
tLeaa Pgency)
has made the ;Following determinations regarding the above-desdribed ,
project;
,;.
1.
Th'proa ect have a sig nificant effect on the
Will
XX
wtl l not
environment. 0
2. / / An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for thl.8
Droj ecC
pursuant to the provipior s of CEOA, and was `�certifi;edas
required by Section 1,5035 0;} 14 California Admini s trative
Coda
/% A Negative Declaration was prepared for Chis,'arb, ject pursuant
to" the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Neg7itive Declara
tiot may be exami_rted at the Environmental Rwiieca Department,
7 County Center Drive, Oroville; Cali.fo;.ni:,a. ��§5965.
3. /7' A Notice of 'Exemption was, filed indicating"this project is
exempt from envi.ronmenta,7. review.
4—If P �A, Appendix H - page 1, of 2
,
UN RANCH SUBDIVISION
D RAPT T: I R
,
Contents
,
SUMMARY
.
INTRODUCTION .,
1.1
Authorization and;Purpose
1.2
Project -Site
1.2.1 Location
�� 2
_
1.2,.2 Ob" ec ive
2
1.2.3 General Description
5
.,
1.5
Area Setting'
f
1.4
Planning and Loneing
2.
ENVIRONMENTAL Sl✓TTINC
8
:2 1
Regional: Setting
8
2.2
Geology_
,
11
v
2.7.1 Descriptive Geology
11
2. 2» 2 Dynamic Geology
1 1
j
2.3
So: iIs-
,
J 2
Hydrology
1.3
2.4.1 Groundwater
u
18
2,4.2 Surface Water
13
1
2.5
Vegetation and,11ildlife
14 ;f
2.51 egeta�tiozi
14-
5.2 nimal Species
2. A
15
2.6
Traffic Circulation,
15
2:7
Municipal Services
16
2.7.1 1,astewal er Disposal
16
2.7..2 Water Supply
16
2.7.E Solid Waste Disposal
;,17
2.7.4 Schools
1$
2, 7.5 Fire 'ro.tecti,on
19
2.7:6 Polaue Protection
15
i
-