Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT. 79-62 3r r RE(~CRENCES 1. City Coundi l , City of Gridley. ;11i nutGs o meeting with Planning Commission and General Publ is to Discuss Issues of Growth, donuary 8, 1979,.in Gridley, Quoted by Director of Public ►Ilorks, Jim Ward, 2 Butte County GeneralPlan, Land Use 'l ement, Reprint, February; 1979, 3. Elford, C. R., The Climate of California, in Climates of theStates. A , 07S. epartment of Commerce, 1 , 4.: Herbert, F. W. Jr., and 'E.L. Begg,, Soils of the Yuba Area, Cal if`, . U, C. ;Davis anfc Yuba ' �{ �`ounty, A 1 9 5. Califorhia Division of Mines and Geology, Geology Map of Chico, CA, 1.965," G,' ,California Division of Mines 'and 'Ge"ology Geology of Northern California, Bulletin 19,09 1966. r 7. U. S Department o,f, Agriculture, Bureau of Chemistry and Soils. Soil Sur,yey;of the r Orov i l le Area, Cal i Forni.a; 1`�". S, Government Pr� nti19 Off7ce,' Was ington",, DC, 1926, B; Ornduff, R.,, .Introduction to Cal i fornix Plant Life. 'Un7`"y of Ca ifarnia Press, Ber,kel ey, 1974. 9. Butte County Public Works Department, personal communication, February,. 1979: 10. City .of Gridty public Works Department; Personal communications,February, 1979, li. Metcalf and Eddy Inc. Wastewater En ineerin Treatment, Dis osal , .ar,a� Reuse. McGraw -h'111-- a 12. City of Gridley Fire Chief Marvin S"rott s personal communication, E'ebruarry, 13. City, of Gridley Police Chief John D „s'a' e personal communic-ation, February 1979,' r. 35 OEPARTMBNT Of PUBLIC WORKS P, O. CiOX 755, C11•Y HALL, rSIDI. Y, CAl•IPO iNI�fiG�l•l�tp TEL, $16 846,36 1 jKnV)C4nmtlfrtAf Etov.tow . oPt�-; JUN , 51,979 1�� 01F �iRI,��.� l�r��� coun"CITY Shil • r __ ii _. Data. -Jute .1979, w J, _ _ Atfontioirr —RANCH �� , • w�„ may; SUBDIVISION , ARE TPANSMI PJ TTl G, 7iaC FOLLOWING: � STATUS; �.......Her�v✓ith , --._ _Copy of Letter, —Approval Personal Delivery Proliniinary l'rfnts & Photos -.._Under stsPardio cover - Infciimatlon ---Approved as subn•:ilted —_Shop q►arvnas i - - Greylioytid EXpress ;. Yo_ur Use ' •.--_--Approved as noted - N177orlal Lists Via Mail --.X--_Rovlaw and Co11inictif --Resubmit I Samplos-------.....As Roque ?cd � coples re, queste-d ( ) _ ,.� _• -, ` w PaylrttoM Request -- Y.Corrt chops .. C MARKS:— 2 w_ ould a ppreciate �r very muc have y.o�-r totnme�ts b, J X15 _ . 1 w 1579. copy To ,...--.__•.. ...,__._,tom,-.,y..,_..,..-.......,,.,.� ,.__.___,._,,,_. e � EARARTMENt OF PU13LIC WoflKs � __ aures `. � .,,.. -....+.'•++wn.w�.ids.n..w.....w,..ww„,inay,myyr+�/M�riVIM.•nf(3H, „ 4` /NG ;4. POP 7-/0// 0/:7 F'z 7”/blly . t„% eiric 77- .r .2 P2- ,2 6-©-.ateCOR � 0 r rGA si /�Q ��-�6 aiR.-� • of BU 777C 717C v'i,I `.,,s7-A:� 1 , r 1! nvtronman/aC RoriaiY E) pi, t �� �t r(�.. r;i JAN 8 1979 (' L i.' i:n �Y lw t� �r f Si 'ti�a` AREA TO BF ANNEXE[) , d if , IC (i GI AL, LOT �VUtrlScFr ,..--•�-.-� LOT LIN:: (. COURSE 8 DISTANC[ �Ftltt,lE4kt3 CJC`l , -ASSE:SSOWS i�,J�C'::L t,Uti1E1LR' „••'" • """"'T IIF Ft,C'NT CITY LIMITS Lddic' ORIGINAL LOT UNE..., , 23 STREET AD1.)RESS FRIVAT"' rviE'ii :,,.....�,«.�.� ,,•.N> .. «...,._. '. ToxAL. A1?EA r j('• /1 "t`+ r 49 •- ' _ r f•,r�rrrN.+."+M'Y�aKw4NiJ.uwi +Nbl.'.,n .AnwNwri.,ww, y.yi♦.1,.ar .n "r`�r^^"'♦,CwM,. ''".r'ia�rw SOr Lk / 100 "r ,F�`Foi -.............M.�NK�I.r..��, r ltaEl x l .«Y duttrh r3 r, G Y.i.r....H..whti+.w.....,.,,N.y, N.w.r N..rM�r ♦.. WwiyNw rww..iu♦«+M w*w+)w-,Nr nV.wy,r..y t . i ��+F,•r.,Wyw,y.«.r,NNf,Arw.M1VN.KwpYJwl+atH a. t� _.- 1. t• l CITY Or GI MMM s } o . ANNEXA7 rai PLaraCN ([INI aN3ITP,,D 'YERRT„TOR ) Pursu:ML to the MMI O W-Va c-ganizatiCn Act of ;1977 (Section 35000 et seri of -fhe °Gove mnmt Code) 4� A. The undersigned proj>erty' Gmex"(s) and chief, petitioner (s) do (as) hereby requcst ' that the property, dcscri bhe�d b,31mi, lap- ann%:ed to tk�c City of Gridley emd in accaardame with Section 35411 of the Goverrurent Codi I understand (s) that such property shall b% liable for the general indebtedboas of the' `C:i.ty exi.stii "j at the tame of. ,such annexation. B,, The AssessW's parcel rjumta:x (s) arul the address (es) of the Poperky to be annexed ars' as follows: A.P. Not 22-26-18 SAV. the S.*E. 1/4 of Sec. 35, T.18N., ME., M.D,A, 4 M Adjacojit�Gri3ley-Cojusa Flibhitiay, Said property is more particul.zrly described on the attached Exhibit "All and '�linea 6d in red on the attached I',xhi.bit "8" (plat) C. The reasons ror this annexation are. as follows. Availability of facilities from the City of Gx�;�] e for utility purposes D. If there ,is a neod for the prc�ety "6escribe4 in "B" above to be imrCzdiately comic cted to the City' N sai?1taly saver system, the City agrees "to al l a,,r such connection prior to the ccmpletion of annexation procee-.i ngs provided that the applicant has: (1) ccupleted anu f4led an appL raiw�`on fob~ sar►:itaxy m7ar connection; (2) aargaleted and filc4 an-Mexatx.cn petition and has paid all aplarc»k riate an4ozation fees:; (3) paid the ap3ropx'iate sewer con- " vection fees; (4) so -=ed the required permit frau the City .Department of Public S irk , . In the orent that ` the Eumexation gropeedings are tr aa=ated for airy wxt:hmit; the annexation bei.nci ccrnplet ed, the subject prop�,,.rt , shall be sLibjectr to :a server servico charge faxed by the City, or, at the option of •tine: City,..9ai.d seWr service shall be discormecLed. F. The pry° mmer(s) arO chief pet hone' (s) for this prcposai are as follo;as : Date of Sigilat L. e Namo and Adcb!t 8s of Signature of proj>--,rl y k?ropert Ck� jex Aj,Led Fps to 3.."cat'ttr= .. _._.� City Attorney T, „ 4. 1nstitut tonal.'.. 'If :1aLituti,011a.,, indicate the major function:, e,5ti.m«itvt1 cmployv%%nC per shift, estimated occupancy, Iodciiifi; fracil.ities, 41[d. community ur�nc fi.t,g 'to be derived fro -,,,i the, proj C.,C 5 Agricultural - Type of crop or livestock - N/A_ ' r, „ 6 Ot her II:S. PAOJECT_kTE - VXISTING, 881=11C', A. 'physical features 1. Land area A. Square miles NEl_ b. ''Acres, 37 + acres 2. General description of topography lat;_0.270sY.o C towards drain_ ditch. Portion of Mg pis current] in t�rtu es 3. Describe, "natoral" buundar es (rive"rs, mountains, freeway's, etc.) Cr zll r Colusa }Ciallway on tilo _ South 4. vascrlbe drainage basins rivers, flood co:itrol Channels", etc - j 20'' d7 �iii7a o el��t�cl7 ri1nil11 11,1 t to lvcst�acressS er�t �.aO 0 ♦ K r � 17t c �. i 1�lmttel�y 380' SoUt.h or ROS( sx,(le 17ro peri y�` , r � 'i 11 r Dcsr'r`lbo, j'�ajor Jij&h-,,7avr, and RJ' t'f,aetSa*,tiv'it SArve g(tneral. area Til.11.,tc,,Vi. ow, })runei11.t`t`'st;11;;.��)111�E'5 51,410— ;>tZl�'__;, 0 �t��.LISGI 1C:}.��}11Y(l�: :. • r, o' AG,FNCY VROVIbIPO 'SMVZC.ES { A Eger i Now Pr2 oiled Action 8.: Library services 1' Butte County t'I,ty'of Gridley 11 9. Parks Clty'of Gridley 10. Playgrounds - City of Gridley 11. schools Butte County Butte Cowxty 12. band -use ,planning Butte County City of Gridley l3. Building regulation, Butte County Cit of Grjdley 14. Public transportation None None 15. Water' supply Wells City of Gridley 16. Utilities (gas 6c electricity) PG Fi E City of Gridley 17. Other 2. bescri.be those governmental services that art i'at now provided in subject area, or which should be provided at an increased level solid Waste Disposal-) ;I 3, Describe stow your proposal melets the governmental needs of subject Area, including comments on proposed new services and/or increases 'its the Level of specific services Sorlfices aro adequate forcurrent USCS The dove loplll('.11t W1!�til rc uire additional services. ,7 4. `.J,f new st'.rvites are provided, holo will costs be mot property` taxes.; connection fees; special assessment distracts; or other sources rIxtclis,i.on of sorykes acid conncctioil fees ai•e paid by the developer. i i +I,e A rJ Vii• lIf r r�oun, �. ENVIRONMIENTALr REVIEW DEPARTMENT April 6 1 EARL D. NELSON, Dirantor , Geddis, Driscoll and Associates, Inc, 4.63 Oro Dam Blvd. , quite N, J ;> 'rr`a�.a95J65 : Qrova.11tr , Cali fo I Re, Lorin WiserTe.6tative ceT",Map, Annexation, and Subdivision AP N 22-26-18 Dear 5i.rsv <.'r We have completed the iin,itial study of potenttq/ environmental iiMpacts related"to the 're,fe.reneed proposed land dd�ivi'sions arid -annexation: The results of our evaluation are .,�,y the enclosed initial st4dy checklist, Appendi, p, and the`°environmental evaluati6h, conducted by the City o f Gridley. Because of potentially signi f` cant "viron,menta7l impacts related to ,the 11S-uni_t i;ubdivision , devel,opmenIt ^r �identifxed by the City of Gri"dI y environmental eerivi o npmental evaluation which is attached act report is xequi ed puxsuan�t to st'�tte law. The Ca,lif,.ornia ' Envirorfiaental Quality Act require5 that a single BIR be prepared .for all phases of :a py,oject involving sig- nificant or poteq.tiaLly, significant :ejffectsj including any ind::;vidual projects which are a, "necessary, precedent for a�,tion on the larger 'p,,v'dlect" (in;this case, the 115 -unit subdivision) (Secticfi` 15069 of the', State BIR.; Guidelines, Cal.i.fornxa Administ ,ative Code) s f 'the; But Co u y Environmental' Review, Guidelines I � draft TETR}�witat han, 2254mcia�ysnfromdthen` zr:.; the form of a , . r} date of receipt of a notice that an E.IR i's` required, 14hien the dtj.f.•t impact report that your office is currentl;r writing i5 f.;nshed, lease submit the document to ;our Q�`fice for review and p g The BIR, once completed and circulated for comment, can then be utilized fax"ali ,subsequent project considerations: the tentative parcel map, annexation 7 ta, er Ptive 010ville, cal(toth a 95M ` 1,r�epbone ('916104.4771 4� { by 1C to the City cif Gridley, and' subdivision develop We require a deposit of the estimated costs of lint processing prior to Finalizing a submittecf draft. This Cost May vary depending oat the completeness of the material submitter. The ,customary minimum deposit for projects of this type is r $606;00. If you wisli to ;appeal the requirement fo''r preparation of ar EIR, you ,may file, .a wrixten protest specifying „' as)Jns thorefo,e with the environmental Reyicw D' nrtme' re ent ',Chia` gust be d&he within i5 days£rom the date the notice L of determination was received by you. If no written protest 1 � is timet filed, an EI y ,• BIR will be required,' i The EIR should proVkdev-,adequate mitigation measures that can be applied to the .preje'ct to reduce significant impacts. �t Also, project alternatives should be explored in the EIR. We will. continue processing your project Capon receiving your EIR submittal and deposit. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned.' Sincerely, { Richard C. Molcar Environmental Review Specialist RCM/ lls :f enclosures y }a r fl Ii „ � ry � `i Irr lL did it oROYIL`LE, CALIFORNIA, t . GENERAL CLAIM CLAIMANT, LorinWi ser r� "t Bt �.� ADDRESS: . , %_1 a1 t r!' t_. „ CITY a STATE- Gridley.. 'California 95'•948 IMPORTANT., SEE INSTRUCTIONS DATE OF ,;7Af �: -_ Peril 16, _ 1979 r-- _ �..—, ON REVERSl:?11DE SIJBM TI%ItLAIM 'TO DE`PARI MENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICE % DATE I F)ESCRIPTION OF CLAIM (DESCRIBE PULLY TO AVOID DELAY) + AMOUNTS A/16/7 Refund of r e Rezone fes for Boit I S S _ _.�. s_.. _,._,. Qn�1'..2618 BRD Log H 78-"12-03-01 X11 I .re l �n ?,S r: t t r' _ c .i TOTAL s ; a 0� 1� the ui5dersignedr declare uhdne penalty of pptfuty that the aeryl,ces or 'articles cinirned'h,nye heen p4rfnrmsd bb deliVered, grid that this - Claltn Is true attd'correct as stated, " Dated thin 1 r f /k /t n day of at. ",kYl:tR!.1 �., r Calif. aa. �y ,.ro,,, ' •u , taw , Stgnatufe at Claimant �.,I the tntli rslatted, harbUy crrtUy that, it) the hetet of m5� 'knnwlydet thr #l' vlat s 6r articir.h specified ahovc,;Itaye he+tt perftsnt+ad or de- .V5 and that there it a F3udgat ilppropriation tyr Spbglfic Jdaurd Approynf '' Checko ) j p�y'tII A Dated !lila ...,,.. day of ✓•.;..��1 u.,.,. 191.,./.. al ..W/ +yJ D�artrnan# Vend or hu4hortxed D.puty Dept. Ek Code ,rr•w s .. Code �' A`Yu, n.r AULM FROM O11,,_10 �� , .�23.11% r UND� DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE AUDITOR'S USE ONLY VENDOR DEPT. SUB, CLAIM VV INVOICE INVOICE c GROSS CODE 6 5U8, PROJ. OBJ. NO, k N0. DA7E DISC' ' AMOUNT ENCUM'e. SUB-DIST. - I I .l,, a a_ Ci rKK t ....�..�.,.....,._..-,—_ a �. iY,.�" ,CYT •r„rtl�th..,v^•.W YJ""--•'",.�.r5�''� �'- � � F.�i � ��-"YwX y�/rM✓K^� �'IKi •MFS {M! �,�� "• •• '. PAIDC,1'RY 4lr1iY ni �. A D 0F tdA7U 1;L>G/,tTd-1 ASND CAaJ'Y AriI l6 �, 79 1 , � ° , ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW DEPARTMENT ' G' EAR1;,DrNEU10N Dirgctor ti Lorin Wise 837 Hazel StI`eet• Gridley, California 95948 Re: Rezone Application from A-2 to R-1 0An# 22-26-18 ERR Log # 78-12-08-01 Dear, r%Ir. Wi8oro. As a result of the Board of Supervisors' action allowing you to receive a refund of f., 05 fox•'rezones in the A-2 districts, en- closed 4 s 8 60rera7 Claim forpt for your s gnatuxe, l f you W3.sh to w thdrav your 'request for rez.6ning this property,please sign and ret.,trn this claim ,form to the EnvIroninental Reviw Depart - Ment, # 18-F County Center Drive, Qroville, Cal; fornia., If you have any furtherquestions, fee! free to contact this depa.rtmenr. Sincerely, IS Richard C MoIcar Etivi ronmental.. ReV ew Special s R04: daf ercl?sure R1" 4.. ff f}1 7 Coy Cer,tar Driy& tl rnviiie, Calilornia 9399 1 el phprrtr �'9l&J 339•g77 ' ti _ t • ENGINEERING bRIOSCOLL PLANNINGSURVEYING _ . ,. AEVD 4510k6 D'AM BLVD., SUITE M pROVILLE;, CALIF, 95965 SSOCIATES (9 16) 5334069 May 17, 1979 . Butte,. County Department ;of Public Worlts 9 County Drive. Oroville, CA 95,965 ATT: JOHN MFNDONZA Dear John: On behalf of my client, Mr. Lorne ,Miser, at is -respectfully . requested that the tentative parcel map, currently in process with your department, be withdrawn: Thank you for any consideration given this manor. Sincerely, Williaia W. "GC'dal v r �',^x6,rt�;E�l i,�vEdw Dnph� r . +yy7fey{ ` � y:ti '' Ura r�:�t r, T,'' �+{s 77 * x r a y +v • Ja�s2 hard �.; 17 1979; a !EaD �Lo 8 j .A•nother* ref er pnae- d�dc ae�it _for thin E. T,Pmm wOij 'b.e the �E LiR. far tha RasiOntial'Zoning b strIcts of Gxidl�ey; . CaliforniO �» Erni,7 nalysts, March '197% We would like to receive a copy, of your responses to our comments oncethose responses a prepared : you have any gue t ons, ply cse' contact earl �.' Ne18an or the dersign.ed, : St6ph- en, A. Str` eetex E'riv�nT�entaoqievt S ecialist s.A.S r!kt , q y ` i!+ U " r • f+ a .. ., Loa 14 r A4-^ IANC Or NATURAL. wNFALTH AND ��;AU7Y �• !- LOCAL AGENCY FORMATIUN GpM SS90N 7 County Center Dr V616) a> N-��+ December 61 1979 To: LAFCo Commissioners From: 3i11 Turpin, Administrative Analyst Subject: Findings -on EIR for item 79-60 W The City of Gridley was the lead agency who supervised the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report for this project.. LAFCo i a responsible agency and has certain responsibilities under the law. After reading the SIR end studying the City of Gr dley's action ori'- this project, I recommend the following finding: S find after reading the final Environmental Impact,'Repo rt and related documents that existing drainage facilities have insufficient capacity 'to accommodate runoff from the proposed project and the p y can and should mitigate City of Gridley and Reclamation District #833 <v the problem prior ,to development. 2. The City of Gridley and Reclamation District #833 are responsible public agencies concerned about drainage problems as evidenced by the city's recent development moratorium. T therefore move that we find that the fact that the. City of Gridley and Reclamation District #833 will solve the drainage problem before they permit development, overrides the potential adverse environmental "impact identified in the report. Bill Turpin Administrative Analyst BT/at f. r !"nrlronmoritd� Idavfaw pcp}, tti'll�f� t CITY OF E ass fluftQ Co nly, March 24, 1980 J Mr,Carl_B. Leverns, Chairman Local Agency Formation. Commission 7 County Center Drive Orovill.e, CA 95965 C� Attn: Bill Turpin Gentlemen The City of Gridley respectfully requests your 'approval of the annexation of Assessor's Parcel 26-26-0-18 into Gridley's' City limits, The Gridley City Council has expended considerable gime and funds .,in reviewing our General Plan, spheres of influence and developing controls that will guide our growth to the year. 2,000 A major segment of our work has been to tliientify the major environmental impacts that will affect decisions to be made by the City on the developing of it's residential, commercial and industrial bones. The City Council authorized the,prepay= anon of specific area-wide environmental impact studies for each zone. We a ^e now completing the final heaxi,n, s on the Industrial Environmental Impact Report, All the environmental impact reports have identified drainage as the major environmental impact. Upon completion of the E. x.R, for the "Commercial Zone, in 1978, the City Council set aside $30,000 in revenue sharing funda,'''for the specific purpose of preparing a master drainage report for the City and the County areas adjacent thereto, to identify the draii.age impacts. f' The purpose of this letter isto clarify as best I can,the points of concern that were expressed by staff, and L.A.F,C.O. members at their February meeting. I must further Clarify that the City staff is not representing the developer on this matter, but is addressing the applicability of our study to this annexation request, This application for annexation is the fir;st, of several annexatiofig that may occur in the next OEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS P. O. BO 758, CITY HALL ULCY, CAALfFOFttTiA 95948 � 1'EL, 910 8463631 Mr. Carl., Les=erns , Chairman c, = March 24 1980 Page 2 five to 10, years _ll it is necessary that Gridley's Master Plan of Dra: nage demon - 'needs that is does address the short-term 'needs 1aa well as the long-term considerations, of the City.. The questions posed to the drainage study are: 1. Does the study provide for the solution of interim drainage needs, and does the report ideri't"Ify sufficiently she long term solutions? 2. Are the„ means available to adequately support the short-term fixed works requirements, and provide sufficient funding; for future ultimate development requirements? 3. Does the report sufficiently assess the dawnstxeam impacts to the several districts at the outfall points? Discussion of the questions posed ate as follows; - 1. Drainage -,solutions ; The loin =team drainage sol it" on was dev�l.oped based upon "Grill ey's Genera ' an s revised land -use elements that were completed in 5eptedber of 1.979 The construction costs identified in the 1.::" study is presented as a barticular solution to drainage works necessary tc' -accomodate the ultimate development cif Gridley.,�s ye. zones, Co,,r�"sxdexation of eicistnp, drainage systems and their resp'ect:i;v4 capacities would"be examined at the time a fixed segment. ,6f the ultimate need was being designed and constructed. The purpose of using; ultimate buildout of the zones Was to insure that the in -lieu ratestructures were adequate to meet an even- s will be reviewed during January o£ each tuali ty. Drainage fee year and. adjusted by a factor set by the annual; :National,, Engineering dews Record cost index, base",,year 11930 is ENRCCI 3131, Short -Term drainage solutions must also' be adequately funded. 1'n`INU Er—ainage fees charged each development must be expended in the district benefitted. The question is; does the drainage report sufficiently address individual development? By way of clarification, the Ban Ranch annexation, will be used as an example. The Master Drainage Report identifies that this parcel., lying 10 acres above the District $33'8 E-1 Channel and 30 acres below, will produce a runoff of 16,5 'cfs..' On page 69 of the report, the capacity of the existing channei is identified as being 79 cfs; ultimate design requires a channel capacity of 134 cfs. Therefore, this section of channel must be shaped, excavated and cleaned to accomodate the future requirements of 1.34 cfs .