HomeMy WebLinkAboutCHAPMAN TOWN UNINCORP AREA % GERALD LIVELY ADM. ANALYST,.
,f� w d.�
�
_ �
�
,� i
y w
� 4 i
.A: _
a �. �.
I J�.
�M
1
�Y`
�� �' "��i� '�,
a j
✓ �
A
', �
N �
�
��, 1t 1'y�r��
� ' ,
�. ': 1 I
a ' ��::
.
A.._
P^ �
( P
•
�f ,
� �C \
,`I•
�-
�� �;
,,�±
„t
..;'j
r •;
� . -
�- : i
� :,
�.'
,,,�- ��
. 1
�
r �� t
a
� � • `�
.
•
°�` � �
„t
�
�,
�
�
n�.
. �
e I
��_ -
I
�
I
� 1•
�,
.. �� ,
��
�
t
til
� _
1L, �
P
�.�
� ..
`
I ,:
I,
1
e •
Y �
�
l �
n
,',�
Y�
A6/ V'L
� � ,
NOTICEOF DETFRItINATrON L
TO: Com] Secretary for Resources JAN :101978
14.16 Ninth St., Room 131.1. CLARK A. NELS0,N. Caunty Cf ork
Sacramento, CA 9581Q•
9y . DODSQI�
0 County Clerk (Filed)
County of Butte FROMi read en
_
1859 B i' r d S fi r e e R gy)
0roville,Ca 95965 __._C .Of Butte _.
Invironmenta ev�ety
ty,.._.,_.r....... enter r a v e
ov
SUBJECT. Filing � .�..
. .lin of Notice of Determination in Compla,ance, i a.1:1z
Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Itesoux ces Code
Project' Title
Communit_Deyelapment Pro'ect under the Housing Comm. Devo'10 mem;.
State Clearing NUm�x �.1_� r.�_�
S'CH 71D52350 ( f submxtt d to Sta,Le- Clea.rin,;house
�
Carl D`; NeYson, Director ENDTc7,ephon Number.
rod ect Location �--_— i 91 6� 534- 47i7
Chapmantow.n area of Chico
P r n e c t D t i o n r �. .___._. ------
Community Development POject under the Housing Commul ity Develop
meht flet Hrn,
This is to advise that the 8 U t t e Count . Hoard ofi_, u et -visors
"
has made the follotva,ng cleterininatiLewd Agency,)
,ons regarding the abQve-desc'tiberi
project
1, The project has beena�
,nproved by tho Lead Agency..
disapproved
project 2. The
p J C�. willhave a significant of fect on the enitironment
Will not
36 0 An Environmental 1'mpact lleport was prepared foto this
pursuant to the provisions of CE�lA arZd was ce �" project
by Section 15C£3,; ' ta•_aed as re-
quited,
(g) i 14 Californiq Adm nisttative Code.
A Negative ion was
to the provisions of C� A Prepared �eo�. tl�� 5 Project pursuant
is attached, A copy o the Negative Declatotion
Appendix Ii - page of 2
4. Mitigation measures adopted by the Leat? A enc r
i npacts Of the approV'ed project are; g_ Y .o educe the
Clone
Signature
Earl D. Nei son
hy i r 0 h h7P tt f 81 R P v„1g�l�D'i 1^P r.: r
A:J:tle
P l ,
AppehdiX IT page of 2
IMP,
P V
n na
APPENDIX G
NEr.ATI' 71E D CLAII.ATION R-.,A'- DI1,C ENVIRO�'fE`ITAL ILLS' C, T'
1.
'IOTICE IS HEREBY GIVE`? that the project described. below has
been reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (public Resources Cade
§§2119 , ,eC sect.) and a determination has been, made that it
will not ave a significant: Affect upon the environment.
2.
DEScamIdN OF PROJECT
Co=unityy Development Project under the Housing Community
Development, Act (HCDA)
3.
LOCATION OF PROJECT
Chapmantown area of Chico
C
NA'-,,\E AIND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT
BUTTE COUNTY
1859 Bird Street
Orovill e CA 9,5965
5,
V1 1ZCATION MEASUMS
None
u.
A copy of the Environmental Review Director's initial study
iceagarding,the environmental effect of this project is attached,
This stuay was
Adopted as presented:
I % Adopted x.7ith changes. Specific modifications and supporting
reasons are attached,
7,
A public hearing; on this VeFat,ive Declaration vitas held by the
decision making body,
Hearing body ._. Conzl.�c9 Sn=-e4-
Date of: Determination
Determination:
On the basis of the Envirotitnental Direotor''s initi,'l sturdy,
the information presented at heap i t s, con.leats received on the
proposal and our am knowledge and fnJeV1tndeftt researcb .
Appendix. 0 - page - of
y
i
s
We find the proposed project COULD ",JOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a. NEGATIVII DECLAV ATION is
hereby adopted,:
Oe find that the project could have a si-ni4i.cant effect
on the environment but will not in this case because of
attached mitigation measures described in item 5 above
which are by this reference made conditions of project
approval. A conditional NE,rIATIVE DECLIkRATION is hereby
adopted.
DATE Argil 26, x.w7
Signature
Bernard D. Richer
Name
Chai=an, Board or Supervisors
Title
r
Appendi% G;-
APPENDIX F
ENVIRONMFNT,Ai, CHECKLIST FORM
(To be
.
comple ed by Lead Agency)
I • BtIC"KOROUND
1. Name of Proponent. P Con-ni7y of B,,4+4-
2. Address and Phone Number
of Proponent:
Bird Street
C • l California — C9�6) 53°a�
3. Date of Checklist Submitted
4., Agency Requiring Checklist -31-777-_
5- Name of Proposal, if applYcab"`
_. �.
T
C.h�r�m�r�i-nTm `tli�mr��-.•�.,a.}i nr� m�n�oy'pmPn•� Prnrrr�m
ZI. ENVIROtJt�iENTAI; IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required
on attached sheets.)
ZITS MAYBE
NO
1• Earth. Will the Proposal result in significants
a. Unstable earth cosiu'itions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, dis lacements
com
action oz avercoverin. ► >
.p g of the soa i?
_X
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features
d, Destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
Or physical features?
X
e. Increase in wind or water�,�
erosion of soilS, either
on or off'
the site?
f. Changes i,n deposition or erosion
OZ beaadh sands, or changes in sijl,tatiorn
deposition or erosion which may modify
the channel of a river
or stream or the
bed of the Ocean or ;!ny baye inlet or lake?
X
APpendiX F]
pale 1 r�
YES MAYBF
NO
g. Exposure of people or pvoperty to
geologic hazards such as earthquakes,
landslides, mudslides, ground failure,
or similar hazards?
X
2. Air. Will the proposal result In.-
,n:a.
a.Substantial deterioration of ambient
air qualty2`
h. The creation of objectionable
odors?'
X
c. Significant alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally? _
X
3. Water. will the proposal result 111 substantial
a. Changes in currentze or the course
or direction of water movements? �. ,
_ X
b. Changes in absorVtl on, rates
drainage patterns, oa, the sate ail
amount of surface water runoff ? X.
c. Alterations to the 44.ourse of
flow of flood waters?
X
d. change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
X
e bitdharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface "water
quality, including but. not limited to
temperature, "dissolved oxygen or
turbidity?
fi direction or
rate Aof flow ofoground waters?
.xM
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct additions
or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations
Ai�pezrl3x F- page of 8
YES
MAYBE NO
h. Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies?
x
i. Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flooding?
X
4, Plant Life. Will the proposal result
in substantia].:
a. ^hange in the diversity of species, or
number of any species of ^' �:.ztsti
trees, shrubs, (ud n
gra.-!-crops, microflora�
and aquatic plaZje-s)
_ ....__
X.
b . Reductio-.�
o., the numbers of any unique,
rare �r endangered species of plants?
x
C. Introduction of new species of plants
into
an area, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of Existing species?
x
d. Redaction in acreage of any agricultural
crop?
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in
Substant3 als
a. Change in the. diversity of'species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals including reptiles, fish
and
shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or
microfaUna) :�
x
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals?,
c: introduction of new species of animals`
into
an area, or result in a barrier to
the migration pion or
movement of animals?
x
d. Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
6: Noise. Will the proposal result in
substantial:
a. increases in noise 'levels?
Exposures of people to severe noise jeVels?
Appendix F »- ;
page
3 of 8 `'�
r.
7* Light and Glare , �•
Will the
XE S MAYBE No
proposal produce
significant light or, glare?
8. Land Use. Will the,
sub' anial a� terationocpif proposal result in a
_ X
use of an area? Planned land
9. Natural Resources, Will the
_ X
.In substantial:`-" proposal resent
a. Increase in the rate of use of any
natlur�l, resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
X
10. Risk of t7
ri-Dees the proposal involve
a "n o an explosion
or the release of
hazardous substances (inolthen
but
limited to oil g, not
radiation), in
thepevent OfSancaccident o
upset conditions? r
11- Population . Will the
alter lacat3on, distra�bttta gdensityIficantly
any
or growth rate of the human
pogulation of
an area? _
-,
12, Houging . Will the—
affect existin houpnPosal significant]:y
`_ X .
9' ar create a
demand for additional housing?
l3 • Tran Ortation/C'rculaticsn. Will the
proposal result in
a. Generation of substantia, additional
Vehic alar
movement?
b. Si.gni ficant effects on existing
g p -
facilities, arking
�
_
or demand for new parking
c . St bet-aht ial impact upon existing
transporttiatibn
_ X
systens?
d Significant alterations to
present
Patterns at circulation Or
movement
Of People and/or goods`?
e + Alterations to Waterborne, rail
`x
air traffic"?` or
Appendj:,t F
` Page 4 of 9
YES MAY8t NO
increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
14.
Public Services,. Will the proposal have
an effect upon, or result in a substantial
need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas;_
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
C. Schools?
d, Parks or oiher recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f. Otherovernme-
g ntal services?
15
Energy. Will the proposal result in;:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy?
-X—
b. Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new
sources of energy?
l6
Utilities . Will the proposal. result in a
need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following: utilities'!
a Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
C. Water?
d Sewer?
.., X
17
llu ealth. Will the proposal result in
a Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
b4 txpo,;ure of people to potential health
hazards
---�- JL
APPehdi-k
P page 5 of 8
YES MAYB8 NO
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any public designated
or
re -:cognized scenic vista open to the public,
or will the proposal result in the creation
of ai4 aesthetically offen$Ive site
open
to public view?
19. Recreation. Will the proposal: result in
--,.,
an impact upon the quality or quantity of
existing public recreational. facilities?
.
20• Ardheol11aliproposal'
nan
resultasi nif cant
archeological or historical site, structure,
object or building?
X
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project. have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish
or wildlife population to drop below
self sustaining levels, threaten to
h
1�..
eliminate a plant or animal communit;
reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important
7h
examples of the
ma ' or
J periods Qf California history or
prehistory
VI
X'
b. Does the project have the potential to
achieve short term benefits to the
-
detriment r,, publicllr adopted long"term
environmenta*1
goals?
pca�3 Ot have impacts which
c. Dueares
,ndi vduaily l'i mited, but cumula-
impac,. considerable? (A project may
impact
p t on two or more separate rpsoUrces
where the impact on each
resource is
relatively small, but where the effect
of the total of those impacts 04 the
'ehvironmott is signilli cant;.
l�.
d. toes the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse efr-ects on human beings,,
either directly or indirectly?
Ppendit
-- Page 6 oft 9
r
ZIT. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The Neighborhood Improvement Program proposed is aimed at oli-
min.ation of one of the highest concentrations
ing
of sub-standard,'hous-
in the County. According to a recent survey (Dec. 1976), 8%
of the occupied housing in the Project area .is unsound..
area
The project will have no significant adverse effects on tho
f or the reasons which follow:
I. The land use pattern for the area has been previously
established as urban residential.
2. Residential densities will not be significantly affected
as a result of the project.
3. The project is consistent with the goals and policies of
both ;County and. City Chico
of general plans.
4. The project will not result in further extensions of
e 'Sting public services and facilities.
IV EXFLANATYON of TES AND MAYBE AVS4JER.S
2.a.
Some short term reduction in ambient air quality will occur
during the construction
phase of public works improvements to
streets with install ation. of curbs, gutters and drainage. 1
3.b.
A slight increase in storm runoff will occur because of addi-
tIOT-Lal paved surfaces resulting from sheet improvements.
6.a.3.
'This impact wll occur only during the construction phase of
the project and will be
confined to daylight hours. This
impact is not expected to be substantial.
I L0. a.
housing rehabilitation is the objective of the project and
Will orcUr.
w._ 14.b.
Studies have shown that neighborhood improve mOnt may reduce,
the demand for Police protection by eliminating blighted
and
deteriorated neighbO:6hood8 where high crime rates occur.
� ;.• '
Improved roads may result in lower annual maintain.e'nce costs.
16.d..
J-xr the long term; a public sewerage syF3tem will probably be
uF eche . to serve the project area.
Appendi�t F - page 7 of 8
7
}
IV. DETERMINATION
(To
be completed by the Lead Agency)
On
the ba..iis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a sigh ficant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION
will be prepared.
0
T find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the envizanment- ;here will not
be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
have been added to the project. ;-,NEGATIVE DECLARATION'
WILL BE PREPARED
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant
effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPnRT is required.
Date
- (Signature)
For
AppendiX ';k' _age i3 of 8
p
. E°
n
OFFICE OF= THE Gp�AM
PRO
OF 1-ICC: OF PLA►�NI O RESEAkCH
t STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
1400 — I OTH STR E EY
SAC.'RkiE417 r CA 95014-
COUNTY
5014COUNTY OF BUT'►`E
1859 BIRD STREET
CRovit.E CA 95965
ATTENTION- L»-';SLXE LAMBERT ASSOC CONSULT
AC KNOW LE DG EM ENT
F'ROJEO'F` N[iT1F1CATIGIN ANO REVIr-'Fi sYSTF.i<f
OF it ICE OF THE GOVERNOR.
f 916) 445--06i3
i
�r
F'ROJEDia SOUTH C)R(3VIL' E AND CHAPMANTOWN IMPkt)VFMQ-N ' PROGRAMS
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER (SCH) 77052354
r
a
PLEASE USE THE STATE CLEARINGHCUSE NUMBEk (IN PlaURE CC kRES'PONDANCE
WITH THIS. OFF=ICE AND WITH AGENCIES APPROVING OR REVIEWING YOUR ;PROJECT
N
at DATE RECEIVED: 77/05/17
P
DATE REVIEW PERIODENDS: 77/06/18
THIS CARD DOES NOT VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH PREAPPL.ICATTON AND/Ok
ENVIROWAENTAL DOCUMENT REVIEW F QUIREMENTS. A. LEITER CONTAINING THE
STATS"Si C Qi'jmr-NT'S.
J. A. LETTER r: ONrzIRmING NO STATE. COMMENTS WILL, EE
FORWARDED To you nr-Tt-R: -rme rikVlE W IS COMPLETtl
�. PLEASE CONTACT THE CLEARINGHOUSE IMMEDIATELY IF= YOU CO NOT RECEIVE
THE LE11EF BY Tt,,r ENE) OF THE REVIEW PERVQDa
w ,
q
Y
:. rt
aq Caz M
EK/
AO MIt^II 'rRATIVE Orr -ICE
Cssrlty Axi nldt 3C[1h6II Niji {ling
oravpit , Capt rr,«°t 95565
January 57 1977
Jays s H. Price, Area D'i.rector
1 Department of Housing and Urban
Developme&u
One Embareadero Center, Suite 1600
San Francisco, CA 94111
Dear Mr. Price
Traznszd-tted herein is a prelims i.nai-y application for a Community
DevelormentBlock Grant to allowcontinuation. of ongolk' CD program
i
activities n the South Orovill.e community, and cotiztaiehdement of a
Demonstration Neighborhood Improvement 'rogram in the Chapinant.ocm area.
All activities proposed herein ,are intended to benefit. lower income
fa,-,tilie.s who reside in, these areas,
rtually every indicator of adv zced neighborhood doterioration is
evident - ng t , '
Vi _ ._
' � these t��ro areas, ur:sound and tuls�e house. 7 vacant irreparably
dana0 slrtictux•es, severely in public iworks, debris—s-L-r wn yards
and vacant lots, shortage of sound housing .for rel6dation of occupants of
blighted units, and inordinately high leve"
s of poverty and unemployment.
Since each of these too ,neighborhoods represents a depressed area; in
the truest sense o the phrase, the county believes that directing Title
CD assistanc« into SoUth Orov Ile and Chavtna.ntoian is consistent with every
legislative linterit of the 1974 Housing and Community Development Acta
We appreciate yatur:situation of a heavy demand for limited furdi.na
resources. Howevar, the county believes that its performance record relative
to past 06 Block Grant ft+ iding bespeaks the cbmailtment and capability to
undertake a comprehbnsivee CD pk,og<am. We are anxious ,dor,your approval, of
this funding reque�. to al.lo;�r corUnliation of our efforts.
Sin
CL MickeIson
GT,County Ad,°rn• do strativ. o.fficar
+4 e Bo lyd of
JI.
�� ....<... vim-
aAPPLI-. NUMdIn
FEDEEI�AL ASSISTANCE-: ` cANrs
3. STAT tiUtIpER
APPLIC `
I. TYPE APPLI• b. DATE
P.4f,1PPLIC1ii0i Year n;owlk ciY
TION t
IDE". S. CAI Year alunlh day
OFC=t CATION 19
FIER
R ASsIcNED I9
lJScrk sP P10TIFltATi0t1 OF li1Tr?{T (Opt) Lhaoe .
yroir+ate [] REpoRT OF FEDERAL ACtION Bt4nk
.`
4. LEGAL APPLICANT/HECIPIENT
.5. FEOERAL EMPLOYCII ID�UITIFW,-VIL1 NI)
a. AWdwant:
pROGRM NARRATIVE
The following two-part program narrative statexlejot cb-scuases
the Community Development Needs and Objectives oP the South
Orovi.l.le ;and Chapraantown Community Development Areas aaci the
two 'sets of program activities proposed for impIdinentation irk
the respective areas. These two unincorporated t4.ommunibies
represent the highest concentrations of conditions
and lower income households in, the County. Their eviceptiona'-'.
need; for assistance i.s the basis for designate o.n. as benefi-
ci.aries be the Couxztyt s comprehensive nei &�tiborhood i.mprovemez t
programactivities.
Pursuant to Section 570.402 (c) (3) (vii.) of the program regulati ansa
the County requests that each of the two program meets receive a
separate rati.zkg. However., act viti es wi thin each prod am should
be evaluated together sines each aati.v:Lty represents a critical
ccinponent of the County's comprehensive approach to neighbor-
hood improvement:
: SOUTH OROVILLE CO RAUNI'TY DEVELOPMENT AREA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMVT NEEDS AND 080ECTMS:
To _continue and exOandp� r�a,-r?„ activities directed toward
elimination of blight. in the Louth Oroville community_.
The County designated the South Orov'ill.e community aS the area
most In need of Title 1 CD assi8tahto, for both the 105-76 tLAId
1576-77 program years. While' significant progrresa' has been
made in upgrading the commusi;.ty., incLi cators be blight still,
pr,ecdon mate Tile ma,jot�,ity of housing is 3.
In serious cUsrepair.,
often pbAing }ieai.th .and safety tilrcat;s to occupants. E�ccept
for improvements being made possible with 1975-76 and 1976-»77
CD Block Grant i'unds, the area is without Gurus rand, gutters,
creating severe storm drainage problems during the, rainy
season- There remain a number of irreparably damaged struc-
tures., which pose threats to innocent trespassers and -, ,,qxreseat
uneconomic land use :in an area. characterized by anext rc 4e1y law
rate of vacancy of sound housing units., Debris. ritr ewn,yards
and unused lots contribute to the generally bliahbod appearance
of the community The social indicators of blight are also
represented by the exlcr,emely high incidences of poverty, un-
employment. and crime, A very pasi c ve social by. -product of
the County7s Title T CD activities is the groWth Jn enthusiasm
and willingness to participate demonstrated by the arrears
property erty owners,
substantial additional. Title I CD assistance is necessary for
continuation and expansion ,of the comprehensive neighborhood
improvement program now underway in the South Orovi.11e area. A.1
The. programs should continue to include components aimed at the
rehabilitation 'and conservation of the lower income housing
supply, alleviation of severe storm 'water, run-off problems with
further installation of drainage fadil iti es$ removal of blighted
structures And relocation of their residents to safe and sani--
tdry housing) and expansion of the planning process being
imposed on the areae s development. Speci.f1 c: CD needsi obj ecta.ves
and program strategies are discussed below,
To imVroye loWeIncome housing_ opport-un ties b 'ncreasigq the
atidilabili.ty of assistance for res;i.dential retiab l.i.tata.on in the
South Oroville community, w
As the County Vindicated in previous zippi cati'Ons fop CD Sl.ock
Grant funds, the housing conditions .in SOUth. Orov!116are among
Y
+
. the Pooz est ffithe County, equalled on1*YY those found in 'GI°re
Chapmantown area.
Several recent surveys indicate the high incide co of sub-
standard housinT found in the 59—block `title x CDproject ara-'a
and its immediate environs. A survey conducted by the Butte,
County Economic Opportunity Council (November, 1975) found more
than 75% (about 615 units) to be unsound. A uurvey conduc,tod.
by Connerly & Associates,, Inc. covered a smaller area (749 units)
and: found 84% (2S7) of the units to be in need of mador repair,,
25% (189) in need of minor repair, and about 41 (27) which should
be replaced because they represent irreparable threats to health
and safety. Since these surveys were conductedA the Coutxty has
used 1975.,76 Title Y CD funds to .perforiti the majol reb,abilj.tat or
of four residential structures and the rermoval of three thoroughly
dilapidated structures I the activity sere ca. area. jrhi.Le the
impact of the County rehabilitation assistance program will he
substantially increased by the r. ecently--agar, deci. 1g70-.77 CIS Block
4L Grant, magnitude of substandard housing caaxditIons and the
extent of poverty in the South Orovil.l.e area attest; to thq nered
for additional Tithe r CD funcling for residential relx.abi.litation.
To provide lic improvements neces8aj:�r .to el:i.nrlhate health and
safety hazards.
Winding through the South Orovil,le area x48 an opeft, drainage
ditoh built In the 1.940ts tinder the Work Projects Administration
(W?A) The ditch is unpaved and. filled With dehso• UndergroWth,
which pokes a major health hazard by contributing to the
prapogation o£ ,mbsquitos: The di,66 should be paved and this
health hazard abated.
�M
Prior to corun = —ement of the Countyss TiPa. I CD program, the
entire South Orovi;lle community was without curbs and, gutters,
a situation which created severe drain age -prob.l:.ems during
periods of heavy or extended rainfall. These problems have been
alleviated with the installation of curbs and ,'titters along
Roseben Avenue, which represents the lowest elevation in the
pro f ect area. Public. works funds from the County c s 1976-77 CD
Block Grant tvill be used for installation of drainage facilities
in the remainder of the six --block activity service area. These
activities should be continued with the, ultimate objective of
prov dingy curbs and gutters throughout the entire 59 -block
project area.
Activities aimed at u�a
pb ding public improvements are critical
complements to the County?8 efforts to increase and improve
housing o)�F)ortuniti.es in the South-Orovi,lli-- area. The provision
and maintenance of adequate public improvements are prerequisites
for the establishment of private i.nvestc res t confidence ,in the
Commur.L ty's stability. Given the need for new housing in Soil.°th
O.rov lZes particularly that which iLs affordable by lower income,
families j the availability of private mortgage capital for new
construction is very important. Historically, the South
Orovi.l.le area has been severely martgat e def:icl.ent.; There are
now indi.catioris, however, that private lenders anis rtevelapers
are reassessing their investment patterns in light of improve,
ment activities trsiiderway in. South Orov:i.11.e. It %s, therefore
essential that these activities be continued: and expanded,,
To demolish and clear blighted structures arid, to relocate. their
accupanl;s into. housing which hieets health and safety standards..
r
is infeasible. while contributing to the area's g4l;nera:Lly
blighted. appearance and posing threats to their occupants ott,i
if vacant, to trespassers, these structures also represent an
unaco lomic use of land in an area confronted by a severe 9horbage
of vacant, habitable uni.t,s.
As part of its CD program activities, the County has reinavad
three vaoant, dilapidated units with the ass .stance of the
El Medio Fire Department and a clean-up team which employed
project area youth. These local resourcesp together 'with
additional, CD Block Grant fw-i .s, should, be ;used to continue and
expand the demolition and clearance program .
To the extent feasible., sltee occupied by blighted structures
should be recycled into the- private market for the development
of new lower income housing.
To increase the supply of sound housing in the South Orovi.11e
community, particularly that which is affordable b lower
income fami.l.i.es:
According to the 1975 Special Census 51 of the 711, housing units
in the Title Z project area are vacant. Given that the incidence'
of substandard housing conditions in the area i's almost 75% and.
that the cor sultantst survey Pound dilapidation to be considerably
more prevalent among vacant units, the availability of habi_tvbl.e.
units is 'very low,
This shortage: has particular significance in light of the--need
to relocate occupants of dilapidated housing IA the area. Ivalthin
the 15-block Title x act:ivi;ty service area alone 70 households
whose health and saEet✓y are imper'ed by the conrilti.on of thoir
housing. Relooion efforts are frustra-& by the u avai.l.ability
of suittal:e replacement housing.
There .is a substantial need to increase the areas s supply of
housing, particularly that which is affordable by Sower income
fay lies. To stimulate private investment anti; development in
South Oroville9 it is essential that the County demonstrate a
commitment to the revitalization of the area> i ii cl.0 d ng the
acquisition and assembling of parcels for r. es�tl e i,a developers
of lower, income housing.
COM IUN=Tf DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ACI Y.ETIES
1. Residential Rehabli.tati,on Assistance. Given the extent of
substandard housing and po'v'erty in the South Orovill.e commur ItyJ
it is essential that additionaI financial .al. assistance be made
available for the rehabilitation, of residential structures owned
by individuals who do not qualify for conventional i,nanciing.
Amount Requested ' . $45.9000
2,. Public Works. The County proposes paving portions of the
open drainage ditch which ci.r, culates through tiie South Orovi.11e
community. Presently the dense weeds growing in the ditch pose
a major health hazard by providing an ideal breeding en`sta x^c+izment
for mosquitos.
Pro p y age facil. t:L s
ro"
Also osed xs further �:tstallata.on of n�.w drain
to alleviate flooding exper'lenced during tho rainy season, its
well as the continued installation of curbs., gxtter°s: and side-
walks as a prerequisite for stimul.ati.ng pri nate developrient of
the area.
Amount Requested $60, 000
3 Demolition and ;Clearance,
DilaP" tel structures r
rehabilit on is infoasxble tv� ll ber sr'Ixich
cleared. The Count tv` Semo.t�.sh0d and tlld a tes
Y ill again seek the assist7nce OP tulle
INtedio Fire Department and will offer neighbor
opportunity for em 'hood YOU(IIA the
ployment on a clean --up crew,
Amount Requested s „
4- �lcguisitiort, The County proposes acquisition
the purpose of possible xan of sites for
dii3posi.t.ion to
t
homeowners or developers of new lower incomeal lower incomeDosing,
Amount Requested e ,
$20.*,000
5.
Relocation. This activity is a necessar
Ca ty t s real Property , ,_ito the
y complement
y acquisiton and demolition
prooraM acts. ities. and clearance ,
Yt also furthers the ob'eLt' of
x�npz ovxn,
,t
lower income housing opportune ties by relocating blighted structures into housing n6T occupants aC
which meets health
and safety
Amount Requested
GO�IPI AgCE WITH SELECTION C , �2q,0t7t?
CRITERIA:
The County submits the followiii. y r
Ing ae evidence r,,;
the criteria for selection eompxlan.ce with
ptrrsuartt to Section 7
Sect -
of the program regulations, 5. 0.4u:.
x
1•• PrOgt'ain Beti:
.fits to. Low— or fi�1o�vatte-:Encoine Fame es..
mnj or ob '
J ectxve o f the Count t The
y s CD program in South or+ov:,lle is,
the elf-m�-nati,on of blight in an area wh�:cj•i
highest concentration or lower represents the
i
Because of this xncom
Income households in. th,e Count
yw
lower income families will directly benefit
from tate proposed �o�,
P e am expansion,
w7-
Benefits to he derived from the individual, program a.c.;v.ivyties
include:
The residential rehabilitati
on program wi 1.1 exclusively
serve lower income families by continuing to offer
affordable financing to lower income owners of substandard.
properties. At present2 the County offers, long-term.,
low-interest rehabilitation loans to fanai.l es 1y1.10se
adjusted annual incomes do not exceed 80% of the County
median income. Granas are available -to f.'amilles with
adjusted annual incomes below 50% of -bad median income.
Owners of Trental_ props -_r -i.esl which are occupied by lower
income households,, are olilblc; mor rehabilitation,
i.nanci.ng if they agree to limit rent increases to costs
resulting from rehabilitation. With encol.tragement from
the HUD Central Office, the County is resubmitting an
application for participation in the IIUD Demonstration.
Rehabil.itati.on Programs throuWi which additional Section
8 contract authority for the leasing of - substantially
rehabilitated units will be made avai l4bl.e. If the
County's application is approved., the threat of d s-:,
placing lower income renters w_Lth. rehabilitation could
be eliminated.
The proposed land acquisit-ion program activity will also
serve lower income fa ad. :L s exclusively since its intent
is to assemble and; sell parcels to developers with the
restriction that, where appropriate and CD policies so
dictate, the land be used for the cortst.ructa:on of new
lower income housing
4 rx.
Thee program activities aimed at demol.i.tion and cl earn toe
of blighted structures and relocation of t:heirr occupa111,t8
to "habitable housing will also serve Lower income
The extent to which they are served cannot be prec:L 0l,y
ascertained without knowledge 'of the i,x►conie statusc1
household type of occupants of severely cii.l.api datctd 'kxnits
to be designated for removal However9 given tho, wide
extent of poverty in the areae there is substantial,,
lilt Llihood that blighted structures are occupied by Lower
income families
By serving to improve and stall' li.ze the South Oroville
community,, the public works program will. serve all resi—
dents of, the area The extent to which: 3.ower income
households will be served is indicated by the 1975 Special.
•
Census f in d:i.in o� that
e 7/% of the households (about 44,4)y in
the two census, tract areas comprising the major portion
Of the project area, have: annual incomes below 80p of
the 10'5 County median annual , income ($111400).
2. -Contribution of Program Activities to Expansion and Conserva-=
tion of Lower Income Hou szn Stock. kehabi.l.itati.on and cbnservatio
of the area t s existing housing supply rind general community
improveme*nt to -re-»c;t-eate the confidence necessary for pri.%gate
investment in new lower .income housing development are major
objectives of the Countyt s CDprogram:
The specific relationships between, CD ad-6.1" sties and the, Kjupply
of lower income housing are as follows;
The Title I CD Pelt abi.litat-ion a t stttl- e program is
directed towk:,rd tiie jmprovemj:n1,, conservation of the
t
area rs 16wer income housing. ThefrOgrarn, o£F, ers .Loa�-.
terms IOW -Interest reh;abi.litat-Qn loans and grarx s ttZ
lower= income owners of substandard housiyg. Title x CU
assistance is also available to absentee owners of un-
sound rental housing. occupied by lower income families.,
with the stipulation that any rent inc�,r.f,ases be 1iruiited
to rehabilitation costs.
Given the extent of Poverty and substandar d
housing
conditions in the South arovil? e areas the � Pgradan and
conservation of the lower income housing SU,
plwy could not
Occur without the rehabilitation assistance pro��am,
The lower income housing
supply wiallb
$ expanded by theproPosed real property acq sition
de�na.iFion and
clearance, and relocation,Program P �, activities. These
activities ti.vi.ties will
consist of the acquisition
�
acid clearance
Of sites occupied by blighted thted structures. T2xe County Will
then snake these sites financiallyattractive for
yposi..
tion to 10w('r ib.come fami.l.i.es9 who demonstrate th;ov
.potential for homeownership., and to developers,,, with the
stipulation that the sates be used for the
cansta•uction
of new lower income housing.
There arP a number of factors t,thich are critical to
Private investment in a commun*.b
y Among these are the
availability ofclevelopabl.e land, the presence of all
adequate physical'infrastructure and the cOfthl .trnent of
Public! agencies and. pi, Yate Property ot�+ners to ne'
P P ighboi -
and conservation, Iax short
Which min ' J a community
ood improvement
' x �izes the perceived. costs o;E� pri'vate in`�'es'tment.
Creation of this sort of envy rortment Of confidence, is the
major Yon;=.term objective of the Countyrs Title T GD pro-�_
gram activities in South Orovil.le. ,
SY . CEt AYE t �I�N CO�Il�tiJY:T. T'Y DEVEGO1�MErt SEA
C0�LNIINITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS AND OBJECTIVES:
The follow: ng, Community Development needs are .sympbomatic o: '
most bli ted lower incocne commwn3t
es.. H'oweVery due to tXt
advanced deterioration of nei borho�
o � :l coxtdii:otts in Chaptncn{;owry
their urs
bency; in this cases is particular Y acute. The County
is appreciative of the .Fiscal constraints imposed by 1977-»-7$
Title I CD funding levels, and is,, thel"'efore, proposir , ;an,
incremental approach to meeting the CD needs: of the Chapmantown
area. Described more fully in the following sctbpartt the first
Program year actiVities will consist of developi,19 a comaiun.it
planning przcess, with. County General Revenue Sharing funds,
and implementation of a. two—block Xeighborhooti improvement
Program-d
Th,, first three of the following objectives will be
at least Partially met by the close of the x,977'-7$program; ;year.
'To, design and imnl,ement a rationn1 lanna pr ycess and n
Neitborh
K "^ .2s .
ood Improvement Program aimed at eliminatxn bl?. i ed
M sun,;, increase and improv n loig
con
g . er 3.rtccrnG ho�t��
°P _0_11
ies. and rov:idan necessary 17ubliiniproVements in
,the, Chapmantovrn area.
Conditions in the Chapmantown commuxtity are 3,n a serious state
of decline and in inunediate need of Public attention and
assistance.
A1.1. the indicators of advanced det�rxoraton acre-
evi d.erit.; incl~•din gy
unsound housing, inadequate
�ttGrttss inade uate publ�;c im
rove-
IP
vaca"t
dilapidated strktebures ,and a, seVere shortage of
sound replacement housing, and rtUmerous debris-Strewn areas.
Ch ar,acteristicall.
Y, physical blight is compl.eatented by ettrewely
h i r�
z 4 Levels of poverty and i. Aotttpl.oyment
r
f
'sg�w-V 14
0
Poverty and the poor Original construction of
areal,�. OXisting housJ,,q_ contribute to t 0 0
t= he communityis genetlalljr
blighv•
,ed appearance., the absence Of a CoMprehensive dommunij-
plarwin,t I "Y
Process in, the ChapniahtOWn area is the major facto,,
re!P:pons,!.ble for the rieighborhood'sdef,'Ilne. 'This Planning
"Vacuum" b.eco;.,ies obvious
With a cursory visual survey of the
area ar.,, is also e, '-,tent in the conununity?s "A-20 zonin-
dUSIE-nation
.5, effectively an "anything goes', (non)
Th -e absence of rational community Planning is largely attr,
txI the IrratiOna-I Jurisdictional. boundaries whi ibutable
Ch Wind their w,o-r
-Whrough the community' i Ithile more than 'bWO-t114_rds (about 31
b7ocks) of the Area is within the
tl�e fact that the 3, 3. Jur'sd7.ct',Oft Of the Couaty,,.
COMMt'tn"ty 'S Part of thL reabel- Chico area
baS served. to make it a "stepchild." of the- t -6y. Because of
its lcioh,
0ab, the impact of, the areats bli, onditions is
_elt lzijc�st strongly by the City: -of Chino, y dt
the city tS
JuriscULction includes only about fifteen Of the ateays blocks
Which are in a relatively le, -3s
:county area.detern
deteriorated condition than the
Clearly.V the design of an areaWide CDprogram in ChaPmantown
- should be preceded by, development- and execution of a COMPrL,,-
henSive ►c0nnfiunitY plaruxing process., which embraces both City anI
County areas. With this tealitation, arid,
its Cbmmitm"nt -to up-
grading the community,), the County has appropriated $20$000 of
its GeheralL_i. . RevenuI Sharing funds for the purpose Of dovelopine,
and �1.anni,n� hg a Chapm4ntOWh neighborhood plan,,In cein-J'Uncton
Vith thls peffort,, the C61LLnt 3.1
C=
917�48 Title I Cb funds to conduct is proposing Use of,
a 9t--ighbothood ImproVemeil.t
F'rOgr,am 31-11 `,Wo blotk-8 of �bhe C I haptnantoI4.n �area,, The Program will,
haVe two, components- reS,
ident-lal rehabilitation
ass stance
public ,tnprovemen bs.
`�'oimp,;rove and maintairi lower i'1201ne housingOptportwiltie4 :inn
..
the Chapman-town area.
Th6 Chapmantown community represents one of the highest c0nc6n_
trations of substandard housing in the County. Accordin jW to a
recent surrey conducted by consultants to the County (December,
1 1976),, almost 80% of the occupied housing in the entire 47-block
f area is unsound (housing condition data do not include mobile
homes) . 0f these units. 64.1% (31:9) are in fair, conditiony
2$.9% (144) are in poor condition,, and 7% (35) are dilapidated
beyond the feasibility of rehabilitation. 0n1,y five unzots are
Vacant., four of tvhidi are in such sever+e d-,Lsrepal.r that they
should be removed immediately.
Housing conditions in the Coiti,nty area are the worst, Within: the
28 full and '6 partial blocks `under C-Iur.,ty jur3isdiction� $v.5
1 F g
(371". o E the occu ta.ed housan is unsound. Of these
y 61.7 (22g)
y>y are .i n fair condz t .c n� 30.5% (118) are in poor co:iditionp and
7.8% (29`) are so dilapidated that rehabilitation is infeasible..
The four vacant;_. dilapidated structures are al,%to iii the °Courity
area
The incidence of po"vertly accentuai:es the need fol, affordable,
rehabilitation loans and grants. Accordingto the 1:97.5 special_
Census 7741% ( 455) of the households in the two c
en.sus tracts,,
compri;,ing the unincorporated Chapmantown Area., halve incomes
below $0% of the 'Cou:nty median annual income. The . 070 Census
indicated that? With n the unincort�orated areas s t�;to ertumera-
tion di'strictt� 22M% (127) of till families and 51.7% (164) of
all unrelated, individuals had annual, income$ below the poverty
level., �Shich ts,, of courses tubstantt.ally loss than $0% of the
County ,s fed .pan income.
1
ji
i
To o provider necessary public ,mprovem� eats an to u �;r�t�1�+ �� .ist:i t x
facilities in the area.
Environmental, conditions, which are rharaoteristic of declining
areas., are abundant in the Chapmantown community. :the system
of public improvements is sorely deficient. The enti; e unin-
corporated area is .without curbs and gutters.. Theexi.stin
storm drainage facilities are in need of repair or replacement.
The inadequacy of this system creates severe run-off problems
during periods of heavy or protracted. rainfall.,. Maintenance of
street shoulders is very difficult where slopes are gat and no
i
curbs e,--isty since. parka, - automobiles cause mu.d he .mss
As a prerequisite to necessary public improvements the Coun�oy
has contracted for a study of the storm drainage facility needs
of the Chapcantown area. The findings and conclusions of this
G:.bu.dy will be incorporated into the community ,)laza.
To -_clear vacant.. -dilapidate d structures and deb'is..strewn =Yard,
and lots, which pose threats to the health and: saf 2!jr of area
residents, and conbribu.te to the generalIX b1i ghted appearance of
the commmilty.
Within the 28 full and b partial blocks of the County area of
Chapmantown are 4 vacaht., x1ilapidated structures for which
rehabilitation is infeasible These structures should bay
removed as threats to health and safety, and the land, which
they occupy, should be recycled into more p;rodactive use. Also
within the area are a large nuinhe3r (s") of vacant lots that are
littered with debris, including abandoned aiAbomoblles and ,other
machinery. A clean-up campaign should be orgahized to clear
these areas:
. 14-
'i
There are * housing units in the Cot*y are;z which are 1.
dilapidated coi,d .tion and will require major vehabili.tati,prj ,,i,
denol.i;t
ion and clearance. Their occupants should be relocated
to safe: and.. sound housing. Attaining this objective i.s frGisi;,rai,ed
,
however' by tha unavailability of replacement housing w-1,*40h meets
health and sa,feb standards. The cons y � su . vey rouri d only
5 "vacant units within the entire 47 -block Chaprnantown area, O.
these, 4 were dilapidated beyond repair. ClOarly. there J,s 1
need to increase significantly the supply or :l�iwer incomo housing.
pr y
Such an investment in development of the area i.s improbable given
the relu4ta.nce of private orpublic Lenderst
Cprovide moi%tgage
capital. in 'detevIorated communa.tias.
A substantial and enduring public commitment- to Upgrading the
neighborhood prerequisite tost" i.x ul.ation of private invest.
menti, The Title I CD program act .-vities proposed below, to
get
with the Countyrs fundi.nb of a community planning efforts are
only the first steps, toward revitalization of the ChapmantoWn
community:
COMMITY DEVELORNMENT PROCRr0'S ACTIVITISSt _
E
The County proposes the desLgo and imPl ementation of a CD project
of Title 'i CD assistance for the Chapniantown cop uuun '(,y. The
P roject trill foc'a-c On two blocks which: ,are rapireseiztatL. ,e Oa4.
the nei tiborhoodt
y � s general condition and soca oNeconomic
characteristics The fOl.lowix g prOCV-6 t actx';dtzes Will be
undertaken Within, the CD project:
I. kesi,desiti.al kehab ! tati.on, .Doig- interest, Jong.,tt,-za loans
and .,
giants a.n1nebe mads. availablex to lower income owrier--bdcupants
of hous:i.nt; a
f reltabiLitatic,ni
The coin, jdef�ce of
y
y
substandarde'ous:in �, � (almost % �'0,0 of all �.uy:i.'t;s) an,ci: poverty
(77.1x% of households are below 8o% of the County, Median) makes
the probability of unassisted rehabti.litati,or on a s:ignifioant
scale na'.1
Amount Reque,gted. $15,000
2. Public Works. Since upgrading of the storm drainage system
has been determined to be a major need of the, Chapmantown ar—k,
the County proposes installation of curbs and gi.VtLers and
replacement of existing st--m drains in the b1..()c)<s desigar,1 �d
for Title T CIS assistance. 1.his activity wi.;l„If serve to d11Qva.ate
the street floocii.rhg e.-eperi.enced Burin ; rainy 1° oriods. `
Amount Requ.estod, $ ;01000
WNIPLIANCE UTT11 SELECTION CRITERIA
The County, submits the following as evidence attesting to
compliance of the proposed Chapma.ntOwn CD program activities
w�'th the criteria for selection, pursuant to Section 570.402
(c) (2) of the program regulations.
I- , pro
gram,:-Benefsts to Low -or Hioder'atewCncorne Faini.les. The
major long-term objective of the County's proposed. Title I CD
activiti:es in Chapmantown is the eradication and arrest of
deterioration in an area which repxlesent:s one of the highest
concenbvati,ons of blig�ited conditions and lower income house
holds i.ri the entire County. Because of this objective, lover
income fatai l.ie 'will be the: primary benef oi.ari:es of the
proposed program activities;
Benefits bo be .specifically derived from the tj,�o pro -
.'ram,
act:Lviti es are as follows.
-16
�w
, +
The
Wdential rehabil,�tat;1.ori
�
ogram will e,Kc].us'% V
serve lower income families �,,�' clf � making
availavailable to locJer a£FUx d, -,,j, r.
able tnc ne
income owners Of substanda.r•t I►octsi.t�¢;
The Countylong-termwall offer
s low.,ntcrest,
relizibi 't
loans to families Whose adju �-at'Lon
seed annt.t��t�, i.ricames do #1Gt exceed
able to property 80% of the County median. income, Grals will be mide avail
50% of the -
owners i+liose� �ltannual incomes do not exceed
County median income. This;�
accounts for � atter income group
78.5„ (357 of all housetic>lrl in t:he tlnzn..
corpor�7 `,ed Cham t
,p an ,own area whose l
97»�i annual incomes
were below 8o% of the Count me
�' dian. n, other words, more
than 60% of the areals total householtn��
(ls.y,� be clef-•
ery low income. it adled as
Wile the number
Of units rehaba.i.ta'tecl With 1.97773 Title
tCD assi starl
he potete may be small. relative to the total need
ntia.
t tbenefits of the
Propertyprogram, Cox- lower income
OlYtle2"s will be made c�.ca�,� ttr,tis et�coriragan-their
derstandillg o£ the t eir
program grid 'th+r :-
Pursuing part i_cipati O .n,
� si.�bsequent £tindixt,L its expaiiis:r.on,
• By contributingto the
pt^ob1 erns wlle
a `via`tion of storm
�'ai;<t awe
ith the installation ai- cu
rbsy �,utterc and
drains, the public works new
acti Nt-ity 14.jl.l set Ve all. res -
of dents of the area. The extent- tc) 19,11:1 -ch lolve
families will be served is indicated b � I �nCome
finding that 975 Special
77.1'
C4S5) of all I., by
in the 'unin-
corporated' Ch p • tOwn area have annual i.ixcotnes het
Of the Count median ,. ow 8o%
Y d� an income.
1 ;ibuti on o
Program A� tivi.tii eg to
Cons:ertat
Conti
_ _ B�t��insion
a on of Lnwer
lwncame Hc�tas•i,rzs• Stack
tenatce of the Chaptnant+�wn t ktepai r and tauii�...
areas lower income ftoi�ts�.n�- ;
and general uph`radind. `� o stock
a oaw c:rariu;icz i t� F;lai.Liti.es to stitnttla{ e '
l� f
new housing development are the major long: tertri objectives o%`
the 'Countyts Proposed Title I CD Program.,
The specific in•teerelati.onships of proposed, Pi'o4.)ram activities
and the lower irxcome housing supply are as folZos;
By offering affordable financing and
gran'�6 to lamer
income owners of, substandard property, the residential
rehabilitation assistance program Is -,,Aai rtted directly at
the improvement and conservation: of th.c t
area s existing
lower incomehousing stock.
Given the extent ofovert
p Y (i 7 - l�,I' of all households are
defined as lower income) and substandard housing (almost
8o% of all units). the upgrading a
and conservation of the
lower income housing supply could not Occur without the
Proposed rehabilitation assistance pro ;ram,
There are a number of critical factors which contribute to
pra.vate investment in new housing development within a
community. Among the most critical are the existence of
an adequate physical infrastructure
. nt of
public agencies and ra.vd ..
P tie Propertyo a
ublners tommneighborhood borhooi
improvement and preservation. Revitalization of the
Chapmantown communit
. 3,,? .and re• creation of the sort of
environment that minimizes the perceived risks 'Of private
investment are the major long-ter m ob3*ectives of the
countyt s proposed public works activiti a
There is a critical shortage of habitable l.Oi er income
housint; in Chapmantown. An
3' ;�rograiri ac -tvity aimed at
ti tnul.at%on of new consirtii;ton oL' such }iousi nQ
+ ,, j however
inc.rementd ,, should be conaldered as meeting this selection
cl-iLerlo
a
ya�� � � t {-yi �---� � �:.� t •NnA:r rl.ir" �,` P. _ -- r - _.
}_ T a: �T I� Y y - ^ ♦ ,t;• ` )� rt8p ' r• a.: t AV> •s+-`•' .�.•.+,
_lic+' ;i r �., S( --..." - C �� R '`^♦.Z ,ti la t�>;t �r,.� .t ii.�� r�»;s'i .t .r"ryc-" "..�-; , ^ � 7.-4 .....�
Poro�'� Hell` M� �'•�l;'%�?{tj ti •:i+, Eilf��,',` 'Z� in;rt?�t^�� {v
tl. .
` r- _ •-'F d. r JTH:
ST. r t3 s r ♦ . ,� !^ . .- . '►'1 1'i 't'i r a y }�
m, e33
i y N.n
tit,.I�. . .._�._ Si �US, -_. S6 y . -0' '� ___. < w v Eq;4Dy•ti s ' .y = _ �'"� C�• ��tir'!` � s` •? -`. �•r � C�/
CA
til?S' C
-,
', ' ,ry u" to -. •� '-- - _ - �,_ _.,. - -- 5--- �r"�. ;`�4�J.�a:'' L J '�...i --i/5 t][ 4VI
t (( .32
STH ST. -_ t STH ST, � t �✓ i
LL r I' ,7TH ST'. 0� H• [A-- -- , �?-
— - r N
♦ .s t�...�
9TH ST,
32 52
=•�+- tnfH F. ��. --, mil. n. S
�• � .., �� y. ,,r,M �: ErSrY+vOo � t
«� S J L raptor I( + sr 1
tOtH to AVE,
O' T. - -- .. �' i C -♦.'i w �, r ` j - _�1�_ N S' y ij
D
1t N j/i , 1 ti' .�
'?TH; St 11TH` 2ST' rFlig ti �O *Jf<��,% �ti 4�ip
'y., J/� ~
ifN
91✓/ , s
` HA_'EC$T yr :. v F G r' 1vi
4
ST ^' •pyo` tSyN Sy � t � '�. ,��• 7pn OP4
st
y L :6iK � ,. y'yN rt�il{ S f � � � � , �� �•I_ '•1�. �
a,
19TH..ltST
A ST
` 51- BUS
oftv
gamn"dMw
2; ST
SST
e 1y
•
74