Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCORRESPONDENCE 800.1 r A • 4 i •�:y if ,. t� M I IONA, r i11S� [�IiI'A It`i'1�11; 1\i°i' C?!- "Curl ial'f)it'I'A'I It)iN hiRah\ I'iil)IfRah IIK IM'AY ,ADMUNIS'IltATION �i{amu I REGION NINE Awrnin.x KeMny Al Illy al� CALIFORNIA n7VISION A. q. Box 1915 Sa.cramenVo, California 95809 ��, del 1983 IMP-CA A-.95 Clearinghouse File: 116.7 Gentlemen: tlndar MB Circular A-95we are ruquired to notify a " g r your pre . acts within Clearinghouse, . regarding actions taken by our office for) t,i.1c, a� liclxb your Jurisdiction. We are therefore, enclosing copies of Our F01-76 n form detailing project ;specific information for projects wo recontly authorized. lie will be furnishing you with this t;Yp,e of dorulnenta;tion. for all applicable autl�orizc-lti.on actions on a Meekly basis. The appropriate Clearinghouse identificat°on number is sh FNFi-7h ander "A-95 Status." own on the If x1d identification is shown) the project was considered exempt .from A-95 review, or an SF-4,24 form has beer, trans- mitted to you separately With Section III i.'ompleted. Our A--95 Coordinator is Ur. Xichael T. Leas (916) 440-3246. Please contact him if you havenanhe may be reached at y y questions. Sincerely vours-f Bruce L. Cannon Division AdMinistrito nnclosure(s) �iti� Ot .�— 'fit„-"�''""`+.�"'"' FEDERAL -AID PROGRAM REQUEST FOR APPROVAL/TO PROCEED '4Q" � C"7CLI FURNIA 283900 t)Et�ArATr,tE:Nt Or rnANsr�c�nr,�7-ION sponsible Urbanized Area ❑ 50,000 to 200;000 T,I.P, Data: MPO_ cniar*r ; ry4 xt Mir PRIvArara n« — DArp .` CALTRANS rFsncy ❑Over 200,000 Date SHS, No. 1 ii Reno 8-24-83 Certification Yes R Local Agency Admin. � Rural Area SECTION 105' Program Period 7/1/ 8_2_ to 5/30/ �$.��, P"EsEa,ranr Fye} r LFTrr�'", scmefR {cq NU P%; T aA" coa: A,.:eptance No Q State Admin. ❑ Urian Area _ 8ht, No, S 1_.r:_ Date j .= ~- BRF—P 191 1 ` JAPOP41 118 _.l6 , - _.=L2 FUrtIRB ADI Yq PROJECT LOCATION (Termini): Dist,; Q 3_—BU t— 19 1 — 1 . 7 TOTAL ROW COST ' In: Butt:0 Counter on SR -191 near Junction SR -70 at REMARKS (State) Dry Creek 'i3r. Bridge No, 12-172. Roy"a Acq . (._.._Patsi �... Location Map Attached,. TYPE OF WORK: Bus« The project is sho�gn on the Bridge Re)�1.acelnent Bridge Replacement. L. R. H.: List. UTILITIES ! TIAL FEDERAL AUTHORIZATION FOR: - DATE TOTAL TOTAL I_STI MAT8D - PFOJECT CASTS PE Rt11'd _ — CONST PHASE LENGTH PROJECT COST FErDGRAL FUNDS Ri=OUESTAUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH Prev, Obligation ❑ Preliminary Ehgineering A-95 STATUS, ] Exempt ❑ Non -Exempt This Request 81 106 64,880p relintiharytAEngineering (or: 'Environmental, Clearanc Statewide (oPR) ❑ T,I,P, ❑ SF424 n , Subtotal 81 , 'I O 0 64,880 Areawide ( ) # [3T.1.P. ❑ 8F424 . Dight of Way for; _ Peev, Obligation ❑ Preliminary Work ❑ Appraisiil ❑ Utility Comments: ❑ None ( Areawide ❑ O.P,R. ❑ Attached, 01 This Request ❑ ❑Acquisition ❑RAP ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: SubtotalCanstrucllort by: F1Rec, of Declsion [3F,O.N.8,1« [ Gat. Exclusion - Prev, Obligation ❑ Cbhtrac ,❑ Attached ❑ Approved,, This Request t Force ;Account (❑ State ❑ Local r Rall ❑ Utility) RIGHT b(r WAY STATUS: 7--O Subluta( Other (Speoit }; y for q p project. All new work _ _ will within ex tag Rt%1SComplt�ance with FHPM 7-5=I TOTAL 01 , 100 64, 880 ( INFORMATION ONLY — Not an authorization document. hot required (no utilities, easenients,disposal sites, obstruCttons, REMARKS (Federal): or niaterial sites are. ,nvoived), Grade cros"sing safety project on existing railroad ROW. Grade ROW cortitication being transmitted separately. ROW certification is allanhed APPRCVA P UES. alb w . �L:. ax �i7 P 3 Ige.J iG APPROVAL pEC0MMEN0tD (PHWA) tr►t+f°veaai�aririN APPROVED (r;N _' uY'[ �acaaAFaasir. AND rIrr<e , y spew aa,a ra i4l ` tyati«r''.or i.�!'-'>�ti�s"• . _ F� IEDERZAID PROGRAM REQUEST FOR APPROVAUTO PROCEED, ratr i.W� r/,,,, .;4c , f;At IF'(jrttvlA f A k 1h58 120' DEPAIT7ti,r ,� or iFAAM 014TATIoN ¢Ncat ,,)'0414 r, it ��.. 457-4439 I sponsibtr3 Urbanized Area ❑ 50,000 to 200,000 T.I.P. gate: MPO ,� tency _.. CALTRANS ❑ Over 200,000 heir; 8[-T, 1pft"Apr'"' No, 1 t1. Reno 6-16-03 PRESCM ADT - PNf F r . r �'Tru�� ; 4J)ABr" AGI 411: P_"a, M, '0 if srtification (:)Yes ❑ Local Agency Admin, _ - X Program Rural Area SECTION 105 gram -Period 7/l/ d2 ;to 6/30/ t33 ! ce tante p [� Na [3 State Admin. ❑Urban Area _ .�. ..-,-... Sht. No.Date _ lAf�pll .-.y..�,,.�.��.�-�..:.. rurump ADD Yp BR -P032(8) 11#3 i PROJECT LOCATION (Termini): Dist„03_—Gle=But-32-10:4/10.9,0.0;/0.6 TOTAL- I'iOW COST i,�Ionn and Butte Counties on SR -32 about 0.5 mile west REhiAR}<S.IStaa�i) to 0.6 mile c.asL of the Butte -Glenn County Line ROW Acq l.�cls) Location Map attached. 03ianel.l.i Bridge No. 12-54, R.A.P,, . _ Frnls, System change. _leis. --- - This waS programmed as a Stage I project when TYPe OF WORK, L,R,H. this route was on the ,Secondary system: The Construct neW alignment bridge and. approachesi route has since been placed on the Primary ay. UTILITIES _ .. tem and the purpose of this request is to con- INITIAL FEDERAL AUTttORIZAMN FOR: t_ R-5 9(11 DATE = fi.-ZCA Vert programming ttom Secondary to primary and TOTAL to request additional unds: ` F _ _ TC, tALESTI "IC�JECT COSTS PES.__., E`*,Dt"/ � l;C)itlST � The project t is on the Bridge Replacement List. PHASE LENGTH PROJECT COST FEDERAL FUNDS REOURST AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEM WITH, W-Prelinimary Engineering Prev, Obligation 29,0i.000 A-95 STATUS. ❑ Exempt d Non -Exempt This Request 6 000 _ W'83010-00--3 ❑ tor; Preliminary Engineering statewide (OPR) # 74102ti90 ❑ T.I.P. E] CA189 -- Sublotal 1 120.000 09G rinn Rlrrr,tolwayror Areaw'de ( ) # 74 02 O T.I.P. ��� ❑ 0sF42-4 Prev, Obligation ❑ PreliminaryWork ❑ Apprntsal ❑ Utility comments, 1 None ❑ Areawide ❑ O:P.R, ❑ Attached ❑ ( Acquisition ❑ R A P This Request ENVIHONME,NTAL STATUS Subtotal Construction by, r.O.N.S.L Cat. �xctusion 0 ❑ (� Ret. of Decision ❑ Prev. Obligation g ❑ Contract . _ _ b CLCL•-.._Nest DeC.❑ Aoptoyed_ [� Attached {` ❑ Force Account (j State ❑ Local ❑ Pail j] Utitlty) RIGHT OF WAY STATUS. "This Request n Other (SpccCty): ❑ ROW acquired for a previous construction project. All new work Subtotal _ - _ ._ Will be within that existing WWo Comolisnce with FHPM 7y5-1 TOTAL 1 , 1 20 000 096 000 INFORMATION ONLY -Not an ituttiorizntion document. ttlll oadisrord iateriYtlits�tes�ae involved), sites, obstruction�i, ) hr ARKS (Federal); [� Oraiie crossing sttte'ty project on existing railroad ROW. ROW certification being trarimnitted separately. DLtlete R/W status n6tation. IOW Cettilieabon is attathed, APPROVAL REW cST`tS� (�L7f{A S .;. . ,AUG 10 196) sneer APPROVAL h5COMMENbEb (FHWA)i4PPROVEb U+rC httKtiO� ri'HtyA) DATC 110101)AC MND t1TLr G17x r1tt 8 a. TATEOF CALIFORNIA—TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GEORGE DEl1KMpJIAN; GoHemor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3 P.O. BOX 411, MARYSVILLE 95901 F ri4 Telephone (916) 741-4434 tz March 7, 1983 File: 908152 Butte County Association of Governments" AUH.q r'0, Planning ccs,, 7 County Center Drive MA Oroville, CA 95965 9 1983 _ CJrov1110, C%alit Attention me. Bef tye Kircher, Secretary ar ` Gentlemen: Attached is a copy ofproposed STIP 'projects to be funded by "85% Fair Share" apportionment: This is a preliminary draft and is subject to change between now and April. 1. It underprogramo the "85% fair Share" fund the following reasons: s by approximately $120 million for o $20 million has been set aside to substitute for cash t ansfers frau PUC railroad separation projects on federal Aid routes. o $100 million has been set aside to finance high priority projects eligible for primary .funds. These projects, now in our Draft PSTIP, Mould otherwise have to be deleted since the draft PSTIP is over- programmee in Primary funds by approximately $100 million. Existing statute$ assign the 85% apportionment to the State highway account and the department will program the entire estimated amount including matching funis in the April 1 PSTM The Draft PSTIP sent you prev3.ou,sly does not include the followingi o Prop 5 Reservatiohs $365 million b Minor Program Reservations $290 million o Reservations for Pavement Rehabilitation $17 million Very truly yours, 86 24 GAMIGAN Acting District Director of Transportation By R, Rogers t Deputy District bireotbt Planning And Public Transportation Attach: PMC322 1 9 8 3 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DAZE 03/07/93 r CONS7RUCTIbN i RIGHT OF 40 4Nb WAY COSTS (THOUSANDS .VERS B usIH-T1 OF bOLLARSIf.. SORT ORDER1 + ; 0 I S T R I C T 0 A ..,..N..0A T .» (� --- - - - - ---� --^---.-.--. � „ PAGE 1 _►...--....,- -----------------„---------_ { E (CONST ES2 RATES) 7% A% A% RX 8% 1 r......frrv,r......>rrs-f'.e�w-rrr:rfa.vr.i.ry rr �r.�r----r---— �....------- ------------------ - w---------------,.-------:-...r..� . P40J, RTE PROJECT DESCRIPTION 82-83-01%83-I/U ,.S SEC' 83-84 91"85 85-86 86-87 87-89' z E/A PH LIMITS' EXIST -PROP GEC bJDGT EST` RATE <---- FIVE YEAR TLP ell........'f....G'r....i,--a-----------•----J:-'r--v'r'1.--�'.'w'�-v�ili-�r—b'-wV-1,y --------------- iil-............. q. i 11 .-a—� u _3.7..,,L5Y°`��y'T"`11�`”TT`1tVE�'°011:itOSS`T£C,=2Q56t•i2Rlttl.<..+r.,.�h....._.'s>. i2"'..�........7g .+...«,..'T2.,_.,- ;..,...� _.�. a>,,,,.. _ �„ .. . m._...,..,.,.., � � _ _...,_ .. ,. � ,�.I;I ,) 253400 • FAU-1D28 SS -50X N9SS8 HID0I4G • • 893 956 * 456 • HA43 • NEW OVERCROSSING • _q + .. �. le D1—__. _0&F --06F`- • a «------ _.. _._ • ;... • -- )' ,^50 49 + MACK AD INTERCHANGz 187 :) QPA�01""'"TECr3't<70't-33RR?4►>FAU=2360GR5%='12'..,_t._.>•r.......,:_.+�e.,eG7,...>...,.s..,_12�.+..:»....x2:.. .___..,,. _ .-......_ ., ..__ +; 1, ......, ,, ,... . _,,....Y...,�........_.... .. e�{ H111 RE;YISE INTERCHANGE ! • y 0 • ,' M • 17.7 p 04F -04F • • + + _ i n ' I 259C 99 * Da MT 50. ELvERTA 4D TO O.8 At 'NO* 125 + i; NAii12 0 SANKE'Y RD , • • 3500 4725 >{ �,..tIF."14---�.-Ct1rJST""4�L.tv.,^r.itPR�Y , , ...._.Y.._ ;..,..._-;. ,�,1...�....,....._+..,_ ,_.,..a�..4725 • ♦ ..�. ., ._._.�.. ...�,...,._..._ , .,. ... # Q, rt 'FHA • 35.2/36.9 D + • + 1+ � • � 1 C+ a ,»,....._... �� _�,...- _ _ . X •-,.--_,r....��.�«....v_ :�.........�....._ •-•—�---e � •.. .,..�.".+ ;»......��,_.. ®. _.-. ,� .. .,�,, y.. yam.. l 286 20 ' irJ YUUA "ITY AT SHASTA ;T. • • + '" „ 246606 + _ _ 65X -i-08 TEC-364•FAU`112•SHAST6,. • • 101 108 • 108 + 1 ,�� �.r'"—tle-aa-°'�-�-•�NE1.�SiGrttrL�S�'i.�CNAN+tfhI'ZEA°T°IAV.�.:«�..,�._.._..--�.".,..r-.._-.--....,.....-. ..n.0 , . r..... _ ,- ..�.,,,.....�..d._ r..�. �s M ' 1646/16 0 04C04C • •u a' • • • + " p , .259C"`99 N 151�• ► w d.2 M1 S0:"'ElVER..Ta .,9 D` TO 0:8"�i} NO,,�..! SANKEY RD • • 275 7700 10395 • I0395 i HE14 cANKE a -LN EKPRUY { _. .. ... ,,.+�u..w..,.. .... ,.u•..kww.v.,.a;i.,=ws. e.. wwu.+,.....r..i..«.:W-.u:,�.,..w+.w,.su.w.,.r.+.. L " V el' .- .�...,...,.«wi sur, ......x .,w . .w,u.....,. 1 4, I +s.e,i+w.-+wr..d.f, ..w«.`-.:—,+.:aa..�..�.w+w,.. T 11 asu--�_—_,-.r,.<♦n..a..ru.,..w.....�.e..-r, ..,.rwa..w.4w_-_. �_�.w:+r .__....w.w.•.-.,,av:.w ,.-a..0-: �,.a-. ,..a -<r .,. ..z.,.r+w. w.,. ,:., . .v wxa.,...r,. uw.. . y i). i{ ) M S y M r tOMC322 1 9 8 31 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DATE 03/07/8'i CONSTRUCTION AND RIGHT OF WAY CO§T5 ITMOUSANDS OF pDLLARSI _._»yp • 1 i R i R9-8 `t S itT pRb. IM�il— ftAG5 858687 f I S T R I C T O 3._ ..R..0 R T H PAGE 1 7 "'-:. 'r.rr•r ........ G'Yrr.....rbr-rwrr-r rrG rrrr'rar.r.rr..r.-rr.r...r..-r..I------------------'--rr--y-• 1 1 _ _ _ IEONST ESC RATESf 7% 8% 8x ax 6% v PROD— R`TE- r r -r PRlJf1ECT"UESCR7P°- -r--r r rPRr....wrr rrr .rr-rrrrr.r r. rr--..-rn - rrr-:r s-..r-r-rrr-w,l)- r---------------------- .1 ur 11 -r. rrr rr- .. -,. �.r-rr�r w. TIOJv"8?-R3"011H..1 R/q -ESC, R3=89 84=85" R5-86' 86367.w 87=88 '= `` "• --�� E/A PM LIMITS EXIST -PROP GEO BUDGT EST RATE �. -- ------------------------------------------ ---------------- FIVE YEAR TIP -rr�.- •---- r --------- --•- ---- -- -----------�+ - -�� u � SACRAMENTO _.._. o ».. _ .. _ - r • o e� Ir rw-lwlr rYl.'Hw.r�.. '✓+.:..wa�._...!.'ra,��... r,,..�.. w. w .,. v.. .. .. �. « . .. Li,..ti+: •:«.... r: • IC �259C 99 • 6.2 MI SO. ELV_RTA RD TO 0.8 NI NO. • u 125 125 • 125 ` :, fiJit-Y5'1.2"".'SAMkL�1`'"RCr—'-r-~ • • ..... . + EiEA9 • CONST 4=L'N EXPR{Jk . i A785 FMA 35.2/36.9 D e • r - it SUTfER . • :1' • ;, 2990 99 0.2 Eft 50. ELVERTA 0 h 0.8 'MI N0.• • r � y _ 'NAtl512—•"°SAEJK:"Y`RO" • 27� 275 275 �. �; � ., .10395 10395. �. .. + ME14 � CONST A -L11 EXPRkY • • ,.�.. ... ... ..,.... .,..�.,... ..�.... t FMA •' 0.0,0t.8 b • it it it it It If , 1 ..'.cur..... ... ...—w'� �. -..�_ _. .. ,.. amu+.._«...r.�.+s;+....:..-.w»a.....a.u. «.. .. .. f. 1 it }....w1..i:,yG,4". w.,r KVi:...,r.i.. i.., h ,i, p. c'w; Yar, ♦ . c.aa rc 4 r. + Y Z i i Georggey DeeUkm[ee jian �� �'6�rr• (:S � � CUhS UirW'li:"VRVWIVX�rr CirpV81f1�1' yj a SATE OF CALIFORNIA-TRANSPORTATION AGENCY ___.____EPARTTME-ME NT OF TRANSPORTATION D DISTRICT 3 p, o. Box 911, nAARYSVILLE 95901 Telephone (915) 741-4531 ` Januaxy 31, 1983 Butte 60. Aafih111g COMM, 03-806-908132 F F B 11983 pm357 C 0r0V111e, CaIRWA q Butte County Association of Govermients 7 Count: Center Drive orm"Ille, CA 95965 Attention Ms. Bettye Kircher, secretary Menbers ed , ' for your information is of � Updated project schedules and ted state Transprt-ation h y «, ;.V�y.LTlexlt Program (USTrp) for Your area.: riyr, .tes have bee-1-1 revised Iran those shown in the 1982 STIP but no new projects have been included. 'Ibis USTip will be the base foi. developing 'the 983 SI!P We will 'be contacting you soon to set up a meeting to discuss your cmididate projects for the 1983 STIP. Very truiy years; Lao J : IROMBA R'E bistriCt Director of Tr. `; nsportatior t 'BY R. Rogers Deputy Distract DireOkor planning and Public Transportation At t hs 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA --TRANSPORTATION AGENCY r DEPARTMEINT OF TRANSPORiAT-i N EDMUND Gr BROWN JR., Governor` 'DISTRICT 3 P-01 BOX 911, MARYSVILLE 95901 Tele,.' �e (916) 67 MV 13, 1982 03-806-908132 pm266 Mr. Bill Turpin Governmental Plaming Coordinator Butte -County- Association Of Governments 7 County Center Drive Orovll.e, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Turpin.- am urpin:am pleased to inform Transportation Co you that Caltrans wiL recommend to the CaJifol'ilj >mnission (CTC) that a project in the Ci advanced in the 1982 State Transportation Z the project to provide four. t3' of M.Tp) le Tt railroad underpasses.' T 62 in Program (STIP): it is ..Lanes on Route 162 in the Vicini during the,1984-85 That improvement is present t` of the Pxisting 984--83 FY in the 1982 Proposed STJT scheduled for construction 1983-8 Fy if the Departwntfs recommendat an is ppro b advanced _to the Very t ours.Y the CTC. IJ T,T70 TROMBATORE ,District Director of Transportation WEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT' DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS State Transportation Improvement Program Project Evaluation Information 1 • ,_,,..,,r.rTv nF_ CHICO 2. JANUARY 12, 1982 (Na:me of Sponsor) (Date) P..0 BOX 3420 3. CHICO MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (Street Address) ,Name of Facility) ` CRICO, CALIF. 95927-3420 4 Project adopted in Airport � (City/State/Zip) Master Plan? Yes XX No 5. Project in adopted Regional Plan? Yes xx. No 6. Project in RTZP FY i9c�l -g2 7. RTZP Priority No. 1 8. Project description and basis for cost estimate: ConstructioYt of new taxiways to serve Tee "Hangar` area (Shown in yellow -see attached Exhibit 'A') consisting of 650 L.F. of 40' wide and 1255' of 30' wide taxivays and appurtenant facilities (drainage, electrical, etc.). Taxiways T-1 (401), T-4 (301), and T-5 (301) to be constructed under this project are shown in detail on txhibit 'B', (Attach sheet if additional space required) 9. CRAP RE:gtl tions Section 40611) 10. Proposed Project Funding: (`a) State $ ]�Q.000 (b) Federal. $ 000._ (c) Local. $ 20j000 . (d) Total $ `200,000 11. Type of Application: 12: Dollar Amount Change: (a) Original. .. XX (a) Increase $ --- (b) Amendment (b) Decrease $ 13. Remarks 41r See attached addendrim. 14. Form submitted by: (Signature) FRED 1MVI8, CITY MNACEEt (Name and Title) Attached; 8 X 11 Airport Layout Plan DAA -106 (12/75) (Directions' on 13ack) Dr.z Tho Purpose �cT�s P Pro' p � of this form is to . airport Project sProvide a description o way. be evaluated in a fair -R dhe Proposed o that it can gl�itable ,y,; The fallowing directions required information, are. designed. to _ One form is. re assist you in requited for each Providing the Item 1 through 5 - Self explanatory.Pro7ec: Item 6 A PP•ropriate regional agency fiscal. year to be funded. Y should enter Planned, Item 7 Appropriate regional agency Priority number, g y should enter regional Item gPProject description, vescrxb information to e allow an evaluatioxl; Pr�;aects with enour.o ia) Construction sco e. projects -- give , location F P use' structural. section , Project unit Cost, etc, ib) Land acquisi.1 on location and purpose of ac size af. area (acres] Prutection gitIsition (clear zona runway extension, etc. " -► approach _ _. Of cost estimate. ) and basis dr (c) Farm must be;. Layout or accompanied by 8� x 11airport plat map depictin ? Item 9 g location of btoject, Give subsection of GAAP Pages 7-9 of 11 Regulation Section on Video Hod �o Get State Dollars For I'oYux airport,' r under which this � , ,project is eligible. Item 10 Dollar estimate; in current dollars for project. in only ��. f item 1.1 project. (b) is checked far amended l te. remarks use fo.r A additional information on above i CITY OF CHICo APPLICATION FOR CARP FUNDS ;RE GENERAL ,AVIATION IW.YS FOR T 14ANGARS January 12,,1982 n 1 There are approximately 150 General Aviation a4rcraft tied down at the Chico Municipal. Airport•and approximately 79,000 annual operations 2. At the present time there are only twelve (12) pe manent T-hangars available on the Airport. 3. In order to assist aircraft owners, on a temporary basis, the City has allowed the use of the aircraft parking area for the placement of'port-a-port type T-hangars with the-agreement that the T-hangars must be relocated as soon as the City is able to construct adequate taxiways to the T-hangar area Located at the south end of the Chico Municipal Airport parking apron. There are approximately thirty (30) port-a-port T-hangars now using the aircraft ;parking area on a temporary basis 4. In addition, a number of requests have been made .for T-hangar spaces: 5. It is the City of Chico,Is intent to construct the taxiways for the T-hangar area and for te private sector to build ;the T-hangars in addition to the pore-a-port'T-hangars that would be relocated as outlined above } 6 Ek, µa•use of the increasing d3m4nd fbr the parking area for access to, ae°unaucical property and for tie-down area, it is essential that the Ci Wy relocate existing T- hangars from the parking area. and to prov de additional space to meet the demand for T-hangars at the Chico Municipal Airports .7. Tlie first phase of :the project, _as' outlined in the Application, W4,11 provide for approximately forty-, two• (42)' T-hangar spaces. The immediate demand will be for forty `40) spaces (30 port-a-port laced on the 2) T-hanE .�,rA, all of . plus an additional twelve (1 , which are p existing concrg ete patking apron). 8 Attached is the City of Chico's Fee Schedule for all otheL,,av a tion- uses at .the Chico Municipal Airport., ADDMDIUM TO OPROJECT EVALUATIONINFORMAT ON't FORM M-.706 i.. CITY OF CHICO APPLICATION Fol. 'NEW TAXIWAYS To SERVE T-HANGAR AREA RV. , „_•.... 2907 ✓It+\ f'. r f•JJ {IJ,7. , 4.�r �^i� �\ / 7� f, lG ti f�rJr j + y` 4 / Oa� i It IN, 151 �/° \ ti, �•� � r�4���� .r �;L +_k +\ r`_, r f f it �C �QNA ✓ Iy1,'!' \Cp"'�,ti1 wry+ • 1 t�,,�'+. '4�f a .lJ„�/i 7. t t ,+ J r r , /,, 1 r ' ' ! ✓r .,, R"r r ` e �� r P G�ir '�+' !sY'c t,,/t',J "+f'' Jti.`�y./.�r»fr,,., �,r„}.�,, F • .�,s y t(.. �y. �' � �r+rT ! /'�.C�'�',a f✓ K�f�f� "�� `�y• �. .�I'•.`' IV )16 '�✓,t t +��'� 1 f ; JQ ""'� �. J'a "( .r(� r �+'<<1• wrwr.... p :1y."T.r.'� too 0 Illy 7 of , r r rI✓ to �"•'�„ ,'.�' �..N3 e` �` ��� ++'++' � ; yal. ter. �'�JG'- �• jbZ�� -'`('NAY �� A F� `� r r+',✓` r /01 lap n !j1 1 - G'117 1 tt \ ,a tj 40 Cr �p fly,. AG, • �XH) ANY_ �_:,.: Dt CITY OF CHICQ �o �Y ra ..----- 7A DRAWN ,Y 1 +400' � T�E'NANGAR -�IV�jAYs nAr�._..: 1�,• .,•„�,. s�A�� )MOMN�� TOi AaRavo rlv:t , r ` "� W (0`) -tl' nIRECTbR OF :PU43 IG WORK. cr O'F�f r- t v n , AIRPORT FEES 3 All aircraft. landing fees shall be paid in advance of aircraft " (AUTHORITY: Seon 11.04.040 Chico ifiunicipnl Code; Res. oto. 57 79-80 adopted Seib cti departure Unless satisfactory other arrancetmonts have been made in ad-ance with the Airport Manager 791 III. FEES CHARGED BY CITY.OR BY FIXEO-BASE OPERATOR(t)- " (k4Ei1DNEitTS: Res. 15580-81 adopted 3/3/01; A. Aircraft Tie-Down Rates. Naximum('), Maximum(') F.A.A. Aircraft Grass Landing Weight onthtg Rate, Overninht Rate(a) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Under 3,000 lbs, $20.00 $2.00 A. All fees charged at the Chico Municipal Airport shall' be in accordance 3,001 - S OOO lbs, 5,001 - 8,500 lbs. 20.00 25.00 3.00 3,00 with established teases, licenses and agreements approved by the Airport Commission. In Cho absence of such leases, and authorized licenses and 8,501 - 15,000 ibs, 15,001 - 25,000 lbs, 30.00 3.00 5.00 agreements, the felts listed below shall apply. _ 25;001 - 40,000 ibsc 'SOIUO �O.uO 5100 ' p. Definitions: Various terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed - 60,000 lbs: Over 60,000 Over 60,000' bs, negotiation By negotiation 5,00 5.00 to that by the definitions included in the Airport Rules and Rejjulations6 9. Hangar Space Rental Rates (Nanaars owned b Otv of Chico t 11. FEES CHARGED BY CITY (O(her than leases, licenses and agreements authorized ,A,A, Aircraft Gross Landing Maximum(!) I'axlRum(I) by the Airport Commission) Weight Monthly- Rate. Oyernidht Rate(2) A. Ham ar Rental (When owned and operated by City) • As par agreement. Under 3,000 lbs. 565.00 . $5.N ` Includes all-field privi'eges, i 3,Oi11 - 5,000 lbs, 75,00 5.00 00 Com�ercial Aircraft Operation' - Individual's As Per agreement 4 5.001 - 06500 lbs. 8.501 -IMO lbs, 85.00 95ego�. 5.00 5,00 .a or t os perating aircraft or hire: or in acdordahce � 15;001 - 25,000 lbs. By negotiation By ne�gotiat�on ,rni—i With the rates established es in Over 25,000 lbs. By negotiation By negotiation II.C, belnW. C, hangar Space Rental Rates (Hangars Owned by Fixe -Base OperAtor or. Tenant): C, tand�in Fos • Hon=scheduled Confrect Air'Carr•iers f Rates shall be in accordance with agreements With fixed-Base Oper" or: uslness xecut ve. rcra (other than Cstani isled y agreements authorizedy Airport Commission): or tenant, (')Rates K ties charged shall be' ti. iformly appl led to all persons requesting I. Non-Scheduled Contract Air Carriers: , �. _ , Z or han90 space, F.A.A. Aircraft Gross (2 'be charged until The ny, will the amount aid or accumulated pp Landing Weight Rate one thirty in any, one thirty (30) deY period the epplicabte monthly rata it Under 50,000 •lbs.. � � n.'15 par � 10000'lbs/landing Which time the monthly (30) day period. Pquals rate will apply for the remainder of the thirty 50,000 i. 90,000 lbs. 0.20 per 1;000 lbs/landing' i , Over 90000 lbs. $0,25 per 16000 ib`s/landing AtCOPTER FEES'_ 2, BusinesslExecutive AircraPtt the rstes for holicopto is shall be the same as those applicable to fixed king e.6,.A, Mroaftr Gross aircraft. tandino 4''eioh! — — Rate , l?,500 - GO000 lbs. 0;15 per 1,000 lbs/landing WOO), - 901000 lbs, 0;20 per 1,000 lbs1,Uhding ,. Over,900000 lbs 40.25 per 1,D0O ibs/landing i Y yy .T V. LEASES AND REPtTALS OF CITY-OItNEt) LAND BUILDINGS AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS A. The rates for leases and rentals of, such City-owned property shall be in accordance with grrements with City or as set forth below under B. B, Use of Team 'Track: $8 per railroad carper day. (Not applicable to Chico Nnicipal Airport, Property.-owners or Airport tenants.] VI AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING CONF_11111CI ROOM USE F'EE' A, All persons, firms Or corporations, except those listed in Section d. below. desiring to reserve and utiTfze the Chico Municipal Airport Terminal Building Conference Room. shall pay the following fee': Conference room uae fee , S15600 Ob, _ B`. Use Priority: Reservation and use of the Conference Room shall be in accordance with the priority listing established in the City of Chico Adminfstrative Pt^Ocedure and Policy Manual. Ci Exceptions! The following groups or entities shall be exempt from the payment of the above noted Use Fee.: 1. CitY Council. City Boards and Commissions; and City advitory committees. 2. City admintstratiae offices And depaP�tnrnts, 3. Recognized City employee organiYations; 4. g are CerfoMmin elunttions Which are for benefiizations which pp Y y of Chit to the City Vit. POSTING OF FEE tc!IEOULE A copy of this Fee Schedule shall be posted by each Fixed base Operator i and shall be made available to all person's upon request t b+ 1 �i OFFICE car THE CITY MANAGER— P.0. BOX 34293, 9S927 TELEPHONE (916) '. '+tel�rLXX.XkcY.�SStiXh't:dCili'li'-XXX 895-4803 °SacraMen) o� GGA-3-18.2/G--CA-1.--1.2.2/chronoMaxch 4, 19$2 Francisco Clay Castleberry Director of Public., Works Butte County 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 Dear Clay: • City PP ,' , 9i2, regarding the Reference is made to our letter of Februp., ,2 •r ,.6 1 Cit of Chico CRAP application. In rlccox,aa��c"O ra�.:•A "Our- request, I am enclosing herewith: 1, An additional copy of the "CHICO MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Asir``' INDUSTRIAL PARVI brochure which contains the fee schedule for property located at ;the Chico Municipal Airport, 2. City of Chico Fee Schedule "Airport Fees1, For Outliner informatiwith the nhave previously discussed the `'Cost Benefit tt California Division of. Aeronautics and believe that I have provided all the information it requires in the Addendum to the Application since most of the _items in the Cost-Ben:efi,t Outline refer to "repair strategies"., etc. As you perhaps know, there are no.existi.ng facilities for T -hangars except for the use, on a temporary basis, of the parking apron, 'There - ford; the only appropriate solution is to build new T -hangar taxiways in accordance with the Airport Layout Plan which has been approved by the Federal Aviation Administration and the California Division of Aeronautics (See Exhbit 'A' attached to the Application), Iam ,a `sed ''ADDENDUM". Please substitute it for .the copy enclosed, with my Tetter of January 12, _ 19 Z, bate attach a copy of this letter to the City's application wheri�rou forward it tv CALTRANS Please forward to me a copy of all 'correspond en e with CAI,TRANS relat- ing to the City's application so that .I can be famililar with the Progress of the "Project Evaluation" i. _ j DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTON DIVISION OF AERONAUTIC* State Transportation Improvement Program Project Evaluation Information City of Oroville 1. Public Works Department 2. January 2 1 , 1982 (Name of Sponsor) (T�„ce) 1675 Montgomery Street- 3. Oroville Municipal Airport (Street Address) (Name of Facil� ty ) Oroville, California_95065 4. Pz-t)ect adopted in Ai_.port (City/State/Zip) Master Plan? Yes X No 5. Project In adopted Regional Plan? Yes X No 6�. Project in RTIp FY 1.982-83 7. RTIP Priority No, 8. Project description and basis for cost estimate., Slurry seal resurfacing 'and minor grading for drainage control for Taxiway nAir (Attach sheet if additional space required) 9i CARP Regulations Section 4061.N 10 Proposed Project Funding: (a) State $ 1;0,300 .._.._ (b) Federal (c)Local $—. tro0 (d) Total $— T” 00 ll� Type of Application': 12.Dollar Amount ChangeW (a) Original X 'Amendment (a) Increase $ (b') (b) Decrease $. 13. Remarkst 14. F(,tit submitted by;All (Signature) Ki x t M. Hunter, Public Works, DI !Lc (Name and Title) Attached. 8 2 x 11 Airport Layout plan DA -706 (11/79) tbirectons On Bac):j R CITY OF OROVILLE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COST-BENEFIT OUTLINE Orovi le Muni cipal Airport Slurry seal resurfacing and Minor grading for drainage control for Taxiway "A". 2. Existing Condition: Existing asphalt concrete pavement, although structurally sound, has aged and the surface has begun to ravel. The resulting, loose gravel and sand causes dama8e to aircraft propellers and.engines; 3. Service Levert According to FAA recordss there were 98,000 operations on the airport during 1980, 3. The logical alternative to slurry seal resurfacing would be a one-inch deep asphalt concrete overlay. Cost of asphalt concrete is su sec.l. bstantially more costly than slurry 4.Service life of the existing taxiway, if properly main- tained, is indefinite. The existing pavement section is structurally sound and adequate for existing levers of traffic. Expected life i..: the new surface is 10 years, S Project cost of $11,300 is based upon the work being carried. out b� local contractors Yand suppliers.. 6. The alternative, using a one i lay, would cost $15,200, ncl asphalt concrete over- 1, Existing, available funds are committed to ot7ier air ort Maintenance anr.1 improvement projects; P 8. This project ect is eli able for Stag p � g- funding under CRAP Regulatiot 60 �• ", .� - � 1 ie � �. � . '. � ., L �� y ' � .ft �� 1 • • • i a .� r r d .. . �° � - � . ti .. �r s ,'.'� P •.a�'d,'-d+.._. .Alm' .. • ria .esC•-'� °-•. 01 TO di. , Sla, C/Oun —`-= :- LA'J0 OF NA''9)rlA ,`d DEPARTMENT OF 'PUBLIC WORKS CLAY CAS T LE©EW W, Director 7 CCUN'rY CENTER bRIVE, oROVILLe,:CALIFo.RNIA 7,5965 T lephonat141bi 534•4691 December 18,1981 H. w MOONALD Depuly Dirattor Fred red o_ Davis Manager Re Transportation Improvement City � Chico Program City Hall Chico, CA 9597.6 �. r1an+►in�'�� Dave Jinkens, Administrator1 Cl.-',y of Urovi.11e �.0 2 1735 Montgomery Street orV%e. Cavitornin Oroville CA 95965' Dear Fred and Dove Funds are available for a3.rport development projects under the California Aid to Airports Program. If your city wishes to apply for these funds, a "Project Evaluation IntoritAti(&' form and a "Cost-Benefit Outline" form (attached)-must-be mp each project. Successful projects tail: be cuded in the 1982dState eTransportation Improvement Progrpsn included Because Butte County h6o contains 'an urbanized area (Chico), all projects proposed for CRAP funding by the aides of Chico and Oroville are required by state law to tie processed through the Butte County Association of Govdrn-, monis. If more than one project is submitted, they must be prioritized by WAG. The prioritized CRAP projects will be ddopted by bCAG as a portion of its Regional 'Transportation Improvement Program and submitted to the state by April l; The state will then consider each ptd'ddt for inclusion in the STIP. Accordingly, tare GAAP forms must be completed and returned to this. office by Februa y 16. 1.9$2. Tlid city should prioritize its projects if more than one - is bein submitted. If both Chaco and Ordville submit projects, MAG 4 i;ll have to determine a method of pribritizirg the projel if this occurs, g g 1± ebrti lty to consider grioritarati d.� we will arrange a meetiit for late Please cointact:Fred Cavanahi if youhaveany questions on:this matter. Very truly yours, Original si rigid iz�) Ibv. Cc��k�eliorry Clay Cdstleberry Director of Public 116iks CCAs Attachment,, Ce n Bi l Tuxpio ,I is .bdY�•••• '°^..`r^•;' IANQ CJF P�ATURAL WEALT°W +'Nu BEAUTY 00. .mow . SITZ GOVERNMENT 7 County Center Drive dtoville, California 95965 916J534.4754 August,2651 198 To CZ.ay Castleberry , P',trblic Works Director. F'rotu.' B13.1 'Turpin, Govermonta.L Planning Coordinator Subject:' Status of I"ighway 162 appeal The enclosed recommendaatYon from, 14chaial P. Ivanhoe, ;xeautive Director that he is stipparting of the California Transportation CoMMission, in�tivates various projects within the ,proposed State Trans- a trarxUfer of funds from improvement Program to the Highway ".62ro,ject in the Tier xI pax�taton 1982-8 fiscal year. The baokground section of this memorandum seems to or not Tier II projects will ultimately leavo cotsiderable doubt as ,to whether be funded, however, this recommendation does seem to be a small victory which testxlt'ed from -our efforts. TorPI Gvernme.itpj Planning Coordin tor. _ ` o 'BT/at Enclosure 4 ok` e Coun w 'a.t LANID QF NATURAL WI ALTH AND BEAUTY Ass, I TI GOVERNMENTS 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 918153447$4 August 26, 1581 A. David Jinkens, City of Uroville Administrator From: Bill Turpin., 4ovcrnmental `I.lnring, roordiristbr Subject'. Status of HiShvsy 16P qj ert7. Thi enclosed renommend-tti dn' f.*oim Michael P4 kwa;lhoe, las:nuti v r is mcg �r o: the 'Ca.li:xornia Ttansnortation Cr,«.me► ,"... its indicatos 4 kit he IS tit:w perti IIL- a tlmartsier of fttndn froM various ,,rojectu vo this the rorzsed 8ta;to T—�ne- partation lmbrovement Pro ;rami to 61{e FigharAy 162 project, IIA the Tier 11 1982-8;� ;:iscal. year. 'xhe baekgr.u,ic; peau- on of Otisr.-�t�z�r+ �d+3 � geerlu 1r�, leave oarriderabl.e dbu- ; t bs to 4:fi }1^r' o;r not Tlii r IT projects will, ultimately be ful-,do ;, howpiar, this dost se, tm to bta trna11 `i.ict s Which ri�a,Atled from, yout -3,F01-ts. nil 'u�riri Ce��eriarripn�al I'1.�7rizi4 Caoxt'�;i�'�ator 8T/at Ei?G10SUre ,', County . /,AND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY ASSOICIATIun OF 6OVERNMENTS 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 55965 916/534,4784 July 28.,; 1981 California Transportation Commission P 0 Box 1139 Sacramento CA 95805 Ladies and Gentlemen: Subject; 1981 STIP Appeals IThe Butte County Association of Governments would liko to appeal the decision of your Commission to not include within the 198'1 STIP a project to widen, and improve a portion of State Highway Route 162 in the City of 0roville between 5th Avenue -and hincoln Street: - nfarIt ma is our understanding that the Cameiissian alas given Out a ' atiara,trith regard to the cost and timetable for the possi,blo completion of this proposed project. The City of Oroville has commissioned an engineerivtg study `of'this proposed project in order to have information available to decision'Making bodies such as the California Transpnrtataon Commi881an. The results of this investigation indicate that the project could be milt out to bid by duly of 1982 including the necessary environmental documentation and that if this timetable were meta the project could be completed for an estimated cost of somewhere between $,5.5 and $6.4 million: It is our understanding that the Commission was told that this project ' and. that the main discrepency between the estimates vtould .cost �9 million is the impact of inflat,.on during,a protracted planning period. There are many things which we believe could speed. ,gyp this project and make it ready on time including the following: 1. Outside preparation of e. �,konmental documents. y_ 2 Becons�.deration b Cal.,„•ans of substantive agreetrieilts by the railroads. 36 Tine fac i; t} ab the City of 0roville has already had ehgineering speed v ions for the project prepared. July 2g; 98i 8I: Supervisor Wheeler stat =e was in favor of authorizing the return of the deposit, but she: would Iznz Acting Count} Couasel.tq research the matter regarding the county owning and mn;.xdng property. On,motion of SapervisomL Wheeler, seconded by Supe�.visor Dolan and carried:, the return of Richardgna 2 deposit of $1,000 on: the purchase of 2:523 Eo=t Wayne, 2510 Fort Wayne a e 2567 Elgin was approved; instructed s Ac.fiing;Countp Counsel to come back with legal interpretation of the proposal from Connerly, and Associates.; 2144APPROVE` PUMC WORKS ITM. ADOPT RESOLUTION 81-17 Aft 81-112 On.mot.oa o.f Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Wheeler and carried`., the following Public Works items fere approved: 1„ Approved Contract Change Order No. 6 in the increasing amount Avenue Assessment tri DisctgNo. 1 and of 58,389.7y for increases in various items of work with funding to come from cont;ngenczes in the Sacramento the Chairman: authorized to Sign, Z Approved Contract Change Order No. 7 in the increasing, amount of 51,2-76 provi:f_sag for revi:sisg the construction of the abutment backiaalls nth. funding to coxae from project confingeacica at Table Mountain Boulevard Bri.dge.,, Project ,61b 23491-76-1 and the Chairman aLthori zea tole gn. 3, Adopted 'Resolution 81-17L declaring Lincoln Boulevard, a through hi gh*Say from Palermo Road to South Villa -Avenue in order .to erect stop signs onthe-intersections and the. Chairman authorized to sigta 4 Adopted. Resolution 81-172 authorizing execution of a highway easement for the Anita: Road'cressing of the. SouthernPacific Railroad at no. cost_ and -the Chairman: authorized to. sign. Approvedi street alignment and wiuth on. the Kelly Albrecht, parcel map,. AP 40-46-02;, in order, to comply with Section 2.0-60(3,) of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance as Public Works recommends approval as the street currently e:sists and was built to County of Butte standard RS-6 for a previous parcel map. w2145.A:DOET. RESOLVMON 81-173 - RE WIDENING'AND DROVING STATE ROUTE 162 N OROVIL Clay Castleberry1 public Warks director, made reference to the letter fromStare Department of Transportation underrcotmnunications. He has met with the study group. The 'money for the State Route Z62,. Gxovi:Zla *cent elsewhere and ?Nos not. approved. He- would: like to appeal the protect. Qaltrans :Ls; Qoing appeal the State: Department of 'Transporta;tion decision. Be would like a reso2ution'stating the Board *Sas coining the appeal and to have the project reinstated.. He would like authorization to appear at the hearing. on, motion of Supervisor Nf kteZey; seconded by Supersisor Wheeler and carried'_, Reaolution 81-173 appealing the decision of the. State Depart of Transportation, to not improve: and widen; State Route. I62. in Orovy le. between Fifth Avenue and Lincoln Street was: adopted and the Chairman authorized, to sign,- the Public Works Director 'to attend_ the appeal, hearing was authorized:. - _ .Z=�6 ADOPT­'RSSOZilTION' $1-1 4, Sl-? 7S IM 31-1176 SETTING PUBLIC, �AR��G DATES FOR . B WON*1E;iTS OF' P�.7BL-IC ti'T, L2'�ILS AND: R✓CRB:�TIONAL ASr.`��:7q On motion on Qr Sunersrisor Down,, seconded by Supe-;isQr. Shoo s �� Carred, the _o i lcwjn- atib7 is hearing dates weregat :.c-r SeptaECQei -, lrt Jul', 3 s . - July 2%8, 1981 I-, Resolution 81-174 setting.a public:. hearing date of September 1, S1 1981 at; 10:00 a.m. for consideration of abandonment Of'Public utilities and 3 Lot; 148 Paradise Pines Unit No. 4 for Zany R• recresticnal easements,: an. Wright was adopted and the. Chairman authorized to .:iQ 2,. Resolution 82-1t5 setting a publics hesting date of September 1, `IO:OQ a.m. for consideration; of abandonment of public utilities and 1981: at Unit No. 10 for Raymond J. recreationa?'.easemeats-on Lot 2f,_ Paradise Pines, Browne:-was adopted and; the Chairmen authorized to sign. public hearing date of September'l, 3.,. Resolution 81-176 setting a p ub1 c utilities and !gal at 10.00 a,.m for: consideration of abandorc. of p recreational. easement:,, Lot. 33 , Unit 4, Paradise Pines. for' Richard Dasch was adopted and the Chairman authorized to sign. 21,47PUBLIC- HEARING DATE SET date: was set for. August 25, 1981, at 11:15 ' a .m. for consider tion of the Butte County glanna.ng 9C s"sign. Grpr eViouily A. ubl_c hearing - area rezone (item oa which. an environmental impact eport was previously fled) ;ia order to bring tiie Zoning into consistency with the recently cert. j -,0- , ren as required by state law, parcels: adopted General P_aa .oma what a desi TIME ITEM N0. Recognition of persons wishing to speak. .CPRESENTATIONS WILL BE 1:1:00 a.m. 39 LIMITED TO FIVE MIRUTES PER PERSON. Communications _ChicoMr.. Hamre writes appealing the negative Lee R. Hamre, . declaration regarding environmental impact and denial of a tentative 4Q arcel mag, AP 47-32-18, two lots, property mole east ed on thStateth P roxe s imately one...-half side of Keefer Road, apP - H.ghway 99, Chico area. Ma aria. Mr. and Mrs. Davis unite 41 Paul and Annece Davis, g____ protest nt g tFie 4looaridge Ranc{t Estates Subdivision in the Magalia enclosed with agenda: - project approved 2/21/78) area. (Copy 42 Loan tit. John, Provo, Utah. Mr. Johnson writes forwarding information concerning a survey of his property which has shown There t fess acreage than he believes he has been assessed for and requests conszd eration of a refund of taxes. (COPY enclosed with agenda;] McKernan submits his resignation 43' R� McK_ er�nan, Paradise. Mr as Cha1Y�ran and;a member of the Butte County Personnel Appeals ommissioC.; (Copy enclosed': with: agenda) Amental review coordinator. :Mr. Nelson 44subr�. _..,. as a member of the Data Processing Executive Committees} ��apl er.c-posed with agenda) entlemen write forwarding 45 Rill Sands and Dean Mi elke The. g. its n`ormat :n: concerning a means for ButteCoof tyS.. bCcoPyeenclosedget and providing aTternatives to elimination,, ob with agenda) Orevi:lle-W andotLp Irrigation District.. tohthee,dltax1rollsct rOfrds 46 the adding its Resolution 7-8%1. authorizing deTinquent accounts. : (P.efer to Auditor) 7 County of'Plumas. The Sward uprthe r�tse of land ites ding 4 its: action i approving ng for timber ..xchangej for the purpose of acquiring certain Critical a Count by the U.S Forest- Service �oPY Z.nformatl s �n Plumas Y grazing land _ enclosed with agenda) State De artme�tt of Transportation. The deParment forwards 48 P �;�format on announcing that studies 16Z in, Oro�:ille1between lFifth ative to widening and. improving State R enclosed Frith agenda; Avenue and Lincoln Street. (copy .:w July 28, 1981 i over another committee which gl.. committee. She felt .ia was a committee watching was an. additional bureaucratic layer. They have still not made the decision. whether they will. keep the ,femoral Ha11s. AdministrativeOffice to study the matter-and bring back .a report p ins.. when Su erlrzsor Lemke returns 2159 COM MI CATIONS �amre, Chico•.-Mr• Hamre_wri.tes appealing the negative declaration Lee R act end denial of a tentative parcel.. regarding environmental imp map, AP 47-32-_8,: two lots, property located on the south side o:f Reefer. Road.,, approximately one-half mile east of State High- way 99` Chico ares. Set far public hearing on.August 18, 1981 at 10:45 a.m.., Paul and Anaece Davis, l�agalia. Mr. and y1rs. Davis write_ protesting the Woodridge -Ranch Estates Subdi_Jision in the 'illsgalia area. ILfor- mations no action. taken. Loan W. Johnson, Provo., Utah. Mr. Johnson writes forwarding information concerning =a survey of his paroperty which has shows there is less + concern than sU `believes h has be,-n assessed for. and requests consideration f oa refund .of taxes. Referred to the: Assessor and. Treasurer-Tax Collector. Roy McKernan, Paradise. y-r.. McKernan ,submiis leis resignation as Chairman y eals COMMiss' and & member of the Butte County Personnel r�pp A letter of appraciatioa to be sent: his Purl Nelson, environmental review coordinator. ?fro; Nelson etuti e Co resignation as a member of the Data Processing Executive Committee. Resignation accepted no action taken. The gentlemen write forwarding information Bill Sands and. Deanieike. a a mans for Butte County to balance its budget and': concerning; A 'obs., Information; providingalternative to elimination of discussed earlier in, the, meeting. Oioville-Wyandotte I"rrigation.District. The district forwards its Resolution. 7-81-1 authorizing the adding to the tax-rolls-of delinquent accounts. Ref erred.. to Auditor. county of, Pltmtas. The Board of Supervisors writes foraardin�' information c-ncerning its action in approvilsg the use of: land for timber excange for the purpose of. acquiring certain critical grazing lands in: gloms County by the U. S.: Forest Service. Information; no action taken. State Department of TraaspThe department forwards ortati.on. information - The tha studies have- been ini.tia;ted _relative to *ai Bening and: imvrovin? State: Route 162. in Oroville between Fifth Aven- and Z.incoln S=treet_. Handled earlier; Lesolut'on adopted. State So=cial Services Advisory Board. The state forwards information concerning the conduct of a series of conferences on thz proposed Information; no federal social-g-rant,..ac=tion taken;. service clock [T c2 dc� a-inn` foitar — — State Emnl.ovment Development Depa tmenr. ce. o_ the relo: tine clnsinQ a� the, Parac_se Q � t reit =_a=ctive:r,sust ?8, 1��= ative t Employment, Development Department Information; no ac=tion taken. FaSe GQ Y - _ i - J !'j ?4 li ck _.- r July 28, 1981. services and professional, setvices. People come in demanding what ever type of service they need and do not want to>.wait.;or care about the laws, as they are: tax payers: and they should get what they want. immediately. They have increased: fees and they. -'have: `beea:criticized. They are constantly reviewing fees.. Tae.p do feel the pain,.it is a whole process—that—does not: have any answers that cza be: taken care of unless they are able tv control inflation. Mike'Pyeatt, assistant administrative officer; stated Mr. Sand's letter had: lot Of posi:cive :aspects and some of 'these, have. been. implemented. 2-156 CONTINUE 'a0' AUGUST 4, 1991, APPOINTM - TO HOUSING'' ELIlSENT TASK FORCE - ' DISTRICT 4 The appointment to the.mousing Element Task Force - District 4 was. 'continued to August 4, 1981. 2157 ,CONTINUE TO AUGUST 4, 198:1.ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION FORMING A MUNICIPAL :ADVISORY COUNCIL (MAC) FOR 'THE CHAPMANTOWN -AREA IN, - C8IC0 A resolution forming a Municipal Advisory CvunciT (MAC} Nor 'the- Chapmantown area in Chico considered at,this time. Supervisor Dolan started the draft resolution was not quite the intent o the Chapmantowa.area people. They plan. to beelectedin November. Del Siemsen, actiig county, counsel,; stated it was based :on the MAG formed in Paradise. They still donot have the: final description. The. matter- was: continued, to August. 4, 1981., Chairman Moseley stated she had not done' her homework on this matter. Supervisor Saracens had brought up some. good points. She has changed her mind regarding MAC. Chapmantowa is, dependant upon Chico, theix needs are, in. Chico. She did not feel the county should be responsible. for this group. It is surrounded' by Chico and the: obligations are -there. Supervisor Dolin.stated they may feel, Chico should: supply housin? and other tariiIIaS, but it is the county's responsibility. There is an identity R and history of Chapmantown that does no,r.exis;t:in any other area. Formation of the 1 -LAC was: the best alternative- for -that area. It would allow residents to become as organized structure to:'deal with and deter ne controversies. This-representsti on. would 'oe the adequate way. They will not Become an - advocate: of pro or. con on: the annexatioa. There is no guarantee there will be complete. agreement at the Board level fro.m their advise. - The ;stats statutes set up the program policies that governments deal with. Supervisor°theeler stated the Forest Ranch area started from an old Nand use committee to farm. heir. community organization. Char_maztown. does not have the same type. (if cooperation. They do not have the resourses ro achieve the same things. They need an:active representative from the .jrea. RECESS: 11:37" `a.m.: RECO ..Nc: 11:47 a.m. 2158 APPEARANCE- JAZ�MS HURS'i" James Hurst, Veterans� ren-resentati7e.F stated he had. a plan to f:*r_ a, group of five to seven individuak— to act as a liaison., advisor:; to all- =lcommittees committeesand to the: Board of _Supervisors. The issue of rents could be discussed, Ee preser'ted a cvp._r cf his plan to the �ssista�st Admi nistra ti :e Ori cel." Super+:icor tyolan' stated iter reaction was, -it is not a -aced ilieas They Fust *tent thiMugft propose4: cz:ang.es , i t_1 veterans selected on the hall - Pa,e ,8, w. 1.9.. yS9 Q v PMC372 9 8 ,1 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PkOGRAM �15C► " e DI11q CONSTRUCTION AND RIGHT OFWA V COST5 (THOUSANDS' OF DOLLARS) 07/)4/81 VEPS A ('SIM -S)' � I SORT ORbER 1 �, iligt►lia RURAL PE61�ONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY FUND TYPE FLAGS: A" �tovilier, 6UTTE COUNTY (bI5T'63) .` PAGE 1 .� ------------------..__ _rte_» .:_� . (CONST ESC RATES) 167. 1 g'� r_ 14g 1nY.8 •! - .: _..._ .. PRO Rte- RTE PROJECT DESCRIPTION PN LLMIiS EXIST -PROP GEO ------ 80-81 01/81 R/W. ESC 81-82 bUDGT ------ 82-83 83-84 84-85 85-86 -r----__ :. r -- -- -------------- ---------------------_' EST RATE 2 ------_..:..._._.»_::--_ ------------------ FIVFYEAR T"IP ------- ------------ r NbN-INTEkSTAT�" r, r + D -------- I 04 94 3x 158121 + ` 0'5 MI W:OF TNIi bUTTE CO tV TO 0-.6 F1I E. *-GIANEII'1 bR. ?t4GtR+ nUT -32 + 157 -10 100 r lnn r, IIE14 ` CONSTkUC•T BkIbGli AND APPROACHES + + 093 + t X b2C=02C2"5r (2) r 10 + r IN BUTS CSL AND YUb COS: r r + r 25g1n E 1IA22 1 + 1 r0 FII W. OF F ORnESTOWN RD (POR) ' + 251+,_ ► At StIR.FACOF r, F " 175/23.202C r 910 + MAIM` OE LANDS $ btbGs r, r A12001 LUMP 5UM MINOR PGM i IIA1 18" Itr++ ► r. 5 19+ 70 511 + r + X20 r bR RRCON57RUCTIUfI 1 ; ' A21001 LUMP SUH MINOR PGM r' 1' HAlt + r 9 i � 5 z r n.a r 920 + + RbAb41AV REGON57'RUCTION + + + 02001 + LUMP SUM MNDR PGM + r + + 92O ` MAJ"RR " � bAP1AGE RCaTOkAT10N r + A23b41; + LUM' SUM -MINbk POM 92b + PRbTLCTIVE bkTTERMi�NT ► � _ + + + : GM SUM MINOfr PGM r 1 bt + HA40d1 o' r 39 ; l.ib r. 1 + + MURAL REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY 07/14/8I VERS A (SI`M-S) BUTTE COUNTY (DIST 43) SORT OROER'' 1 FUND TYPE , FLAGS. A PAGE Z _r, .., (CONST ESC RATES) .. 1G! __rr-__---rrrw.-rrrr----------- 147. 10.1. 864 8: ----------------------------- --.:-rrr__-r r_._....rr ---------- pt2OJ RTE -------------- ----- ----�.--------- PROJECT DESCRIPTION aU------- -81 01/81 R/14 ESC 81-82 8,2-83 83-84 84-85 65-86 Ph1 LIMITS ST�PROP GED __-r:.__--_----�----r_-_----� DU DGT EST RATE <�--- -rr .:-____---------------__rr K-IVE YEAR TIP > :_---�-r»..-,..-----<... _------- -�-=-----. -------------------=--'------.rrr. __: r r NON -INTERSTATES CONT t } 920 EDGE DRAINS, LAT. SOPP, RESTRAINERS r , A40041 ' LUMP SUM WNOR PGM t. 5p r' _ HA4 'STA , r TR.c k 1 b1.U00b t t SAFETY IMPROVEMENT ' LUMP SUFI MINOR ;PCN t 28bt 145 ' 130 10' S 3U Ifel r � i, ti r I 934 t CONTROL OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ' 80 10 43 + 43 B3410U1, t LUMP SUM '01HOR,'PGM r HB34_' i �' r ►' i CA i i"a U 930 TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL' IFIPROV EMDNTS r + 5 to i r 000;1 44 LUMP SUM MINOR PGM i 14$ 1Otl + 100 ..12.1.0.. r k 1 RURAL REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY 071I418I VEkS A t5IhirS) TOTAL BUTTE COUNTY MIST 03) SORT ORDCR; 1 FUND TYPE PLAG5: A PAGE ----------- rr rwr_ arM«w-r—err-r_--rr—r—r—rr-.-----w.----«i.r 80-81 r'---rrrr-r---ww—_r—r--«_---rrrr-'---r—_-- 81-82 82-83 83-84 84-85 r-w----r.r —rrr 85-86 DU4GT <___w P 1 V E V E A R T I P --> ' ---r.r.��---�.nraw.r—��r�w--a—rw---rte -------------- IDENTIOIED PARCEL + " 2 " PROJECTS, Pld ' 10b i CONST " r " _ r 251 s r _TOTA4, r 251 i 14D 1D0 LUMPSUM WCE i " g 50B 217 152 94 80 TOTAL' + i 523 i 265 152 9A Db 5Ya " c r TOTAL PARCtL RW ", 1B � 148' " COOT i 75G; " k17 152 ' 9;H 80 ' - TOTAL r i 152 �, �4 nU w T R A W, S P 0 T A T I 0 N P R PMC373 1981 SPATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUNMAR.V 1TIw'j 1'r' 19 OF TO JUNE 3b4 1986 CONSTRUCTION AND R/W ONLY (TNOUSANb5 OF; DOLLARS) b7113%81 VERS A (SIM -S) FUND TYPE RURAL REGIONAL :TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY FLAGS A BUTTE COUNTY (DICT 03) PAGE:, 1 _ _ _«k_- ---t- -«�-----L--__-------r----"__----- - 82 82-83 83-84 84-85 85-86 5 YEAR ------------ TRANSPORTATION 80-81r^ 81 < W I V E Y E A R T I P r'- TOTAL PROGRAN s.�.�,.._._�..«_c-........__«�.._..__:.y-__._t.r.irrr_�,�_«_�.._-d-_.-._rr.�__r......____......._r'......r_r..r..r..::..'-..«r__:_r«-. DUDGT -= �,=_-........:..__r....' NA1144 LANA, BUILDINGS S ! CONSTO 18 5' I9' 70 50 19 765b 144 FACILITIES ItIPHOV. ! TOTAL+E 18 5 r � ` R R/W rE CON5TM 9 c,E DRID DNSTRUCTION>_ ' TOTALx 1 .5 2� 2 9 i1A22RlC� ROADWAY ° ►f CONST!i 252 i 100' 101 O1 RECONSTRUC`IiUDI ' TDTALrJ 252 1 100` y _N N?3 r A R%W ++ A23 DAMAGE ` CCN57rf r 5 RESTORATI;OII ' TDTALJi- 5 y !t NA4 PROTECTIVE + R/W CaNST+ GD 1 2i' 17 17 $9 39 OETTERMENTS 1 TOTAL)+- 60 I 21+ ' Wri+_w-r_rrr'-_�+uf�w:�uul..r�rr4Yr_r.--Y[r.r_�44rMw-.�L ri rsii-4-r'u►V UL.rr_r'r +�_�'r« 4« i.r '. ir'wL_rL.ii.wrW r'rrY'i:_-r-_�_-rr--y_IMrutr ' R�NAflIL TAt1D1i ' A/W 0' Ct1NSTH 331 17 142y B9 5q, 298 TOTALk ----..r--------..i..«..:L-r----:.r.. ------------------ 3i1 17 10 89 Sb -----------l—«.s rr:�s- r'►..-_..:::.i-.i.r�:.'r ------- 2g8 _......'.. •..r..:. ------------- i.-' 5Af Et:Y + R/W R CoNST+� 5 xetl i 5 ri lbb 1b 5 3b 5 4t 5o ,.,. EN IMPROVEIIIS- . TDTAL 285 5 ib 5 3O IDS i1B34 ' R/W 4 .,ROAp5IDE' EN1iANCEMENT' ' CON51R; �i3 0 + TOTAL* 8 + F�b4�t rkA CDNV+ {ItY/E,�tP�,ES54lAY ' CUN5TM X45 y 1bb 1`btl DPER IMP OVEN NTS + TOTALx 150lob it + •t_rrMt•'i'-LiaN ulwufit«-u'+`,r'r ulr-:wi'W 4r�lrr}ilr,ri..lrr-riiriY ' '✓• r_�ir-rr-Ltr Krifr-.;.-w-r-tiiN GLr W --L rtu a:a:'rk.µWL11N.Li rIJ •.• u>w u�aL aii+r rr--.r Y:.:+ -1::.r rr rYi--ur l t r r RURAL REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY BUTTE COUNTY (DIST 03) - PAGE ._..r_------------- . ; r-_--------_-------__------------------------_------------_. ,, T 8182 . � ..__. _--=- �»»-------------------..------�----------_� Y3E8A 84-85 85-86y-_-5'TOTAL � YEAR PRANSPbRTATION RDGRAM x BUDGT - P2I8v E R -----8 T I P > ----.- OPERATIONAL R/W R 18 48 '' 48 >- ItiPRO1lEMENTS ' CON51'k 425 20b 100 5 30 245 i TOTAL* 441 t 248 10' a 30 293` HE14 ` R/W * l0U ' 100 NEW HIGHWAYS ' CONST* TOTAL* 100 lob ---_•�----_---- ---..........:.......r-----_—r.:... ----.____----.—...-___r.�1. —_--»----_...�.... +. _.._r___r--..»»......._...yi.cru_r.Jr_.....:—�.__r _r_...__.....»»»—.:_rr_��» w RW N 18 148 148 T 0 T A L F COWtTM '756 2117 52� 94 80 543 r- TOT'ALw 774 368 152' 94 80 691 . li l I, _ PNC372 1 9 B t' REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION INPROVENENT PROGRAM 0'T/14L81 VCRs H (S' M -S ) CONSTRUCTION, - AND RIGHT OF NAY COSTS (THOUSANDS OF COLLARSI SORT ORDER 1 FUND TYPE' FLAGS. 8 RURAL REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY - RUTTE COUNTY (DIST 03) PAGE 1.. (CONST ESC RATES) 16X14k t0% 8,x 8X PpOJ PTE PROJECT OE3C4TPTION 80-81 0081 'R/U ESC 81 82 82-83- 83-84 84=85 85=R6 PM LImits EXIST -PROP 5EO BUOGT EST RATEt- - VF YEAR FI c + NON-INTERS-TATE • • • ' 6 a + + r r 94" 32 • J:5 +'RI 4 OF lwr BUTTw CJ LN TO 6.6 + r 157 '13 -s • T3.!, 15612'# 4.I E.-GIANE:LLI HR.RtGLEr..HUT - 32 + •11'32. 2365 � -,.. '236k•- .. , 4 HE14 + C'OKSTRUGT HRIDGt AN, APPROACHES +' � • p +- F. ' ! j,t,fl).A x nzC-02c i11�' i.i�� 930 CdNTROL OUTDOOR 46VFPTISIN3 t60 1kl! -32 16W,, i:5 t134odl LU4P SUM MINOR PGM .: +, • + • H844 • » r _ 'CA • to.O 0 i e " 930 • TRI10FIC OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTs + + LT to At • 11 H44CC:1 + LUMP SUP MINOR PGM to t0 H044 + • tail t RURAL REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY 07/14/191: „TOTAL:9UTTL'000NTY (DISI' 03) - VERS 0 (S1M-8) SORT ORbtR i FUND TYPE FLAGS': U --------------------------------- --------------- HC -4I; IUDGT 81-82 A2-193 EI3-84 E4-85 <--_- -------- -------- 85-86 ------ - --------------------- F 1 V E Y E A R T 1 P I'CENT[FIEp PARCEL, r • • r . PROJRCTS Ru • � r • i • � CONST • 4 , 236& TOTAL• • r 24:39 •' 5YR • - 2439 LUNp5UN ►'ARCEL • S i r CONST • • i.G • 21 T0TA4 r • 9 to 10 5YR •.3 • • • 31` • � r � 63 TOYAL T'ApGFL • 1 � • I • S4 • • w CONS? • � R9 � • 231( • id TO*4L • 5YR r � 31 • � � 2a02 _ 111 PMC 373 T R- A N- S P O R T A T I 0 N P R 0 G R A M S U H N A Fi Y 1981 REGIONAL: TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY JULY 1, 1981 TO .TUNE 3br 1986 1�7/13/JI ' CONSTRUCTION AND k,/U ONLY ('THOUSAN6S OF UOLLAR I VERS EI (SIM—S) RURAL f2EGI:QrdAl TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY FUNQ TYPE FLAGS 8 BUTTE COUNTY (OLST 0.3) -----------------__ _. ru.«„„v - -- -- -- -- - ar« _ a-__. . w_rr TRANSPOg1aTW [ON 80 81 r -� --- 8 4z 62-83 83-84 64-85 _ r «----._ rwa " ----- ----------- --------f'AGEr_1 --- - PROOhAM, r HUDGT {.:. r-_ F T V E Y E 9-R T I P 95-86 S YEAR .-----1 TOTAL :.—,uo. araaa__rrra _�..✓rr� _r_«—, ------------------r---------..—_—y««_--_-- HR3n r R/N 32„- RnAOS'xbE ENHANCEEMENT r” CONSTr # TOTAL' ► 16 `16 ; � li r. 1,1 i;gNVr NUY/E>Zt'RESSWAY11 CONST, 1'00 10 , aNEr�' 1NPN OV'F8ENTS w TOTALr 1Or 2I 20 � .. 31 _.✓�....r_r�---_.___.W_.� - - - - w__«`�r,i►r 'u r r - W - r ✓ _r_rr«"� ............ - - ----- - - --- - --- -- - --r; ok�EanrinNAL ri4 TM�RRUrMENTS + f1NST• Lp. 1q 20 10TAL4 25r 3T 63' rr_a««rrar-:rrr.errwrarrr.�rw✓r..««_liLr4:raaur«:at�✓—..l«W_�wwr_r_r:�.i l�rirr r...r_W ras-wWw__.«'.ywr__y)'r.wr_w.�.rrrr�.ewr—a_rr.rrr«r.�-rr_rrr'rww 11k 14 h/4 . T3, ✓r«r rrr�ii,«r_a.—:i:i r, NE;� HIr,►1Na5's ,` rONSr4 2,35i r 73 2r35f arwar'►rrWna.-r TOTALS 2r ASG r �2r43q wrrrwr ar-rLLr Wr-�.�.rrW✓rW---------r--r_r_rr'ii�r br r�r W—rr r5ra r__rrWi�W r�._a_rr�'✓ar rr rrr ------------- r 2x3764 10 316 TOTAL* 2.46$ 1T 2r5b2 0 PAGE G AS OF 1981 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (STIP) Ct1N9°fRUCT -ON' AND-RIGHf-OF` ,A-VC,63 3-"HOU3AND S -OP QOLLAR31— STATE --°STATE 'WIDE _ OUT COUNTY (DIST 3 suwaw�rrwaw�rwwnMrrwr*gwrarr�rwrrrMirrrrwrrawri� —'PRIHA'.RY--V.C:ASH�,w,..: wgwwpll�wrwr�lrrw wwrwwrwrw.lpw ww Mw�1ww90 i�wrwwwMwww w 4tlMw"we w .wow meow w4lN,44www wwwww kOUTE PROJECT QE8 RIPTION (rw.....rw..rwrwF'IVE YEAR TlRwwwwwi•rr.��www) REGION, w.ww..rnwwwprew,MpwN' "i?ww'rraowrnrr«'no�wrrwPRI�P`(��0_"`..'.'"_'.85w8b-.Ppiuk!Ty A'fi�tp't9M" --•,. '..wr wwa*wowrwewwww wAlrrwrarrwwawUlpwww�rgwri ri bwwwggmw A,a�mlrwwww�lwwww�} iwwr M,wR.ww �O �w.w ..3�,.r.,��:.w„�,�..op.,S..H.1-"-�+-•OP-••Fi1E--HU•T~T�-GO-LN�-to�o-,�•�•-�...�.-0_�p.e._..n.�.... ,:.�,,,.p p, _ gam.,_.._.,. 158121 , MI C.-61ANELLI 8R. **GLE# OUT 432 . 100 0 0 0 0 HEA 4 • CONSTRUCT BRIDGE AND APPROACHES id 0 0 0 ~`A Z00iP.—,—'L00-SUM lNORi PQ a 0� A ,.. 0 0--- y HAI • STA / 0.0SO 000 S 19 10 0 . • 920 • BH RECONSTRUCTION 0 I.—A- — • AAift 1 Pilin .111,.. 0 G O 0. EDMUND G. BROWN JR, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2r- �J GOVERNOR �40�:.. �. Cott i Glx t$ Trait opo rttt#tit tt �fi`lYtti 7120 NSTREET, P.O. BOX 1139, SACRAMENTO 93805, (9 16) 445.1690 June 29, 1981 Puii•o CO- R011ming Comm. JULA y 193 �rdy Mrs. Bertha Moseley, Chairman Butte County Association of Governments 7 County Center Drive OrOville; 'CA 95965 bear„ Chairman Moseley. am Writing to inform you of the actions affecting the Butte i-Etioh of Governments that the California Transportation ounty whenAssoadoptingthe 1981 Sta Commission took nspoetatioh Improvement 01-ogram (STIP). The funds available for the e ra_ of the amount needed to complete.111 thelPrdreG spro imatel Y $1.5 billion short p j in the 1980 STIP. The California Transportation CommIWon's policy for dealing With this deficit been (1) to maintain a+full program during 1981!$2, While the legislature has considers measures to ►hcrease funding fior :transportation, and the- W- the program'to which it Is committed in subsequent years to re (2) limit existing system and p serving the making safety and rehabilitation improvements to it rtather than: adding. projects to those prograrnmed in the previoUs -STI p, the i.mproVements (see attachment . Years` of new fadi l Wes and o e'rat' p tonal Commission has ad tci un ro ram three In applying this policy to the ro'ea maintained a1 the pro in Butte Count i Y, the Comtiss i on as adjusted for new eojects-scheduledtPor..1981%82 ih the STIP adq ted g, rehabi i itation and safetyp of on' expected del iverydates: In addition, 1X90, from 1982/83 to 1984/8$ haveobeen dtt�reta hede In this, the e1580 STIP for the years I" classified 011 otherp j 9 p 9 Y ariis,.i ip� i Wn iav e 1'o ea���; in the 1 �80 rn r'am as a Tii;.r II that can be added to the new -S IP oh.y if floe Legislature Pe Odes the Legis 1 at`ure hos directed" the i)epa ettnent topcoht i nueneW f'utid i h Work oh liar I1 Projects during 1981/82'. No hew projects have �' however; prn,ect development the program. ve been added to With regard to the pr-✓jects ttientiched in your, letter 4:o a"s identifiLd right-of"w4iy,acquisitlon foto the Giah�i11 Bridge the Ot�himission has 1981%$21 as a flet 1 ra ect ahrt laced donstruc't p , g r :$ched-uled 'for Ver 1i iist'ng for 198121/1836 p ion of the bridge in the Ti Nawever, if the 1981I8z State la`u�ie. g t Act so Y Bertha Moseley I Lige Two .lune 29, 1981: limits State Highway Account funds that not a'11 r ; for 1981/82 can be completed p,Q„ects i be post oned, ri ht -of right-of-way ncluded in the STIP P `� y ac uisiti�.,n for 1981/82 9 Y have to /82 tna h Neither the project to re nor the one to place the bridge over South Hon Greek on Route 1986 STIP adopted thin blanket on a section of Route 2 t 7Q Department's P Y the Commission, They were or 3 were included in the 1980, recommendedPropodeleti9o� of ltheDRoeliaer original y included in the Postponement of the bridge for, one s ' 1979), Lut the Department, in Aril Ute 32 project from the ado Alprill Department's recommendation ort the Route 32 pied STIP; and yPAr• The Commission -accepted the of the Honcut Bridge exceeded project, but decided thatthe cost its benefits, and therefore also excluded it lhstlo8o 101Pa' The Bride 9 has a ranking of 271 on f"torn 3 , and an estimated cost of the Departmenfi's statewide included in last year's STIP, the a ell.$ million. Since , Tien It this Y t not candidates for either Tier project was year. Tcer 1 or, Your letter also 'points out that Bu residents have aid• tte "has beeh a donor county ih that Of State highway expendituresaw then,taxes tnan the less effects of inflatio y have received in the form' n ,Oh the fixed seven cent Unfortunately, the relen t- counites in the State in this situation. gasoline tax have receive about $470 million in 19$1/82'fromThe State wigr�Nay Account Willed most local overnment. The cost of o g h the rest about 41 p �. going to Will be $ 5 million_ and an maintain the ..xi.;; ` statutoryn additional+ting system $55 m i 1,1 s on must u to -rheet allocations for mass transit and 'focal assistance. basis,. only a sr►all level of State funds are left in fact, only tie sur lUs for Dh an annual supporta p accumulated highwaY construction: in recent ears w primarily Pe'deral Y'fi'nanced construction program for 1981 e y allows the State to This letter has hopefully clarified the Calif / 2. action in the adoption of the clarified STIP as it Nelates �rnia firansp°nation Commission's keep local agencies ihformed of further decisions' to action on the deficit ma to you, We intend to y require. If the srf that legislatc`ve the Commission off', At (916) 4451690. have arty quesions, pieeSe contact Sincerely, CAROLE, A. ONORATO ChalrMn Attachment , f, STATE OF CALAFORNIA COMONb G, 13ROWN .1R. L"o . i _. `cit ' e•.t f fA0 N 5YREETE POr:130X f t39 BACRAMENTo Jsa05' lune' M, 1981 Regional Tr.int,pbrtation P'lahniog Agehcies, County 'transportation Commissions, and the Department of Transportation G s Facing the 1981 STIP ub'ect• Financial Ci1'cumstance The commission's Fund Estimate,, adopted in November 1980, called for fully fuit;iing the 181-2 fiscal year of the updated 1980 STIP and assured funding of only rehabilitation and safety projects thereafter. This was necessary because Commission staff estimated a $`l .5 billion shortfall in State revenues compared to the level needed to accomplish the' updated 1580 STIP. Under these circumstances, the full fiscal year of projects for 1981`82, and safety, rehabilitation, essential lump sums, and statutorily -required p d as "Tier 11 ; .......;.�... ..�,...�a.e..„„ a ,This pGlehn 32 -- Gianelli Bridge RECOMMENDATION Butte/ ►mt R+n,�/"ti i�vrr r. '"`y peLAna 'j-.•' ++. '�ti:••-"/:u!'^ '"' roject ;wanld replace the existing bridge, dgb TIth li :. yes "A U over the Sacramento River .with a new brfld C and ara n`i x ra. ��' �Yttllt '� �-'F'ROJECT 1.0r✓A7ION MAP J approaches EhPErTIVE-^ N-OESS RANKING tl/ � .. -.. •u PROPOSED iMPROVEMENT q PHASE OR PROJECT PROGRAM ESCAL I 4.1��' ; �p"s .,, v ,,5 { YEAR, COST j 1 t , PROPOSED Hight of Way 1981-82 $226y000 sm I cel SOURCE OF FUNDS (r,tec.tk ' cRmity u - nConstruction • bon MS.i Flsr URi V mi l Lion RAI FAP OTHER `, ��rN ` COMMITMENTS ur nn SPONSOR �. � �� � I \ ` ` lJ eJtl CaL 3 is i 4 $ r, , m I i3p . 1 t" ."��„+�.�,�_ S o PSTih a This project was scheduled in thea dopted 1,980 STIPfordalivery in 1991-82 with a total cost of $11.884 millron: iM the USTIii, the Department, slipped tho project's delivery date to 1582/83 and Increased the cost estimate to $10.914 m1111oh. • eusuv`wu ••; •_ " *, The 0 and Men a reidates that the present bridge Is structurally i w �.: The De arement ihdis:ates y iow peak hourly traffic rate of 870 ' ' vehicles; the pr6joctls ranking on the bdpartmentit ',statewide nl .s• �.: _ •„ c pr or ty 11,11 of 227 rs i i 115t is c s�w �, .;.�.�•,t,. u � p:`;;° .w�:• ,..,�r,loIlt iwmafns aoterdlgln011y pro ammed _ as,a prdj ct to help m eet the otd vimum st4tutory requirement, has since bwenrNrdAt ^� t} tci t�3u FA'sLl 1 y PANG a �- p►M la^C`S, \ A 'tt, .,+ 00oko iNlCaf a a' C ` ` 'S P y P j"ic0 1 cost Ihcrdase end the r0hse4uuntial �fralh r 4r Ong' Ile the rb a the Conrs►issioh has teen cowitthd to thl's r„t"b",. t.t , on ''t'h'at Funds p Jet to adoption of the 197D and 1980 SYlPs" f`oh �• � r , s5�::. 0141 presentIt should be lneluded 1r Tler I I • , i a PANtNajn1�' r«tN � 5� .ar raasuL � COUNtY ROUTS .. hiAhri t11r1i /h1 CilN 82 0AN4Q llhlbilt ' nGfun-�++.+....Awuysi5l 1'�nRMhh, Rahn iNI't4' A��`Sf�hlir www - - RECOh1MENDATIdN _ �-IF N +. u ti,�.uy (u t� ` °' BLkte/yuba 70 South Moncut Beidlto 0 NOT pltf]CRAM ' tars,r. „r ' 4 A-1, ra'"' tt. ;t � I .� v Rdo-Me � the bridge on the South Noncut Creek- PROJECT t ,1 LOCATION MAP Line COST EFFECTIVE- r on Route. 70 at the Butte/Yuba County NESS RANKING. (� -- ,14rye 14. , ` Ony`lu, ,r a c s 5fr' G! n� a PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT PHASE OR PROaIEGT PROGCIAM ESCALr MUM s YEAR ST m � pROPdSCU Construction $1.3 itc � -* IN , ifF mill lon SdU�RCE OF FUNDS cou,; l�JrPr* C[a oBridge Rea tl' k ,r a �., •, r� i ,k � ��vAiitir'li�i FUTURE a U FAI RAP OT14ER Cr' f M Ml ENTO ,sr+rO .+SPONSOR t r ti"� ` ld a asst " irv) •41r^ ar I„ `ttua y{fk°t �aLa .. rt S) 19UtlSvl'`flT- 1 ¢wgllt c1 1ly� STIP Sr NG ♦ 11 ... .s7 S E rs"nd'Sw„#s •' a(�+� �At's`i.. 1s�� ntili�AU! �u Thi3'projebt'was origltiell'y iielud(W 6ri'the I�spnt'tiMertikrs l�k3b PS711'x r Q fl. . ( ,{'.'•,4»1�', 1;1,,1 1ss11. sA+�i r��rP :a�N_„ '1 r NbtvrSver the ComntisSibn deleted the project becsiU§e of Increased cb$t . estimatt:s and a Ilmited bridge Itets;ncemcnt allocatlbf�: In April; 1980; the Department had recbm+ianded delaying ,the project for a yeara is W w.l t a v � rtr� rt a4'as etares .a G40 al fA5p binsens M� G V358 +Cerner���# 4.Lr;y n wy. " �. V5°6` 4 1 4M"'{y a Tile 11I.,t i:b tabun tyAs tatial.n f $oVehment5 objected to tle'deletlonrWas not 1tGltided"f thS prY patby the 191 PSjIPs uhaWare that Il In the 1980 STIP IIIc cntnmissian ad5pted. BecdtlSa tha Cabnvnt:sstYants + y -�.�c. _ '"�,,,,�•�` a ._(q first touunitnient Is, to projects In the 1980 adopted VIP and the r 11Z! 1 r. g' p ed, thl p-' 6 j tea. �, N S �pqC ro�enrancct ` qualify f=or inalusioneInntheu1981aSTipititity s tb eat'dbes not sit::�1 a, Ba c°u x: a Cot rJYY h6UT NAhhE_. ButTt/YUbA 70 5gU111 11010T 6{2W11v 'f1+.uu.r*rr,+y.+.e.�N.,lw..a�w w.+mv .,a,a.a wwrv"..+ir..w.+�a.�.ur�.w...r.=.,l.,h. ,.. , •. Sdad�+aW/dh rn r __ 1., _4 RECOMMENDATION Butte 162 - .Undercrossings a DO qff PROGRAM 'ROJECT LOCATION MAP U Reconstruct and widen two anderpassoyt - on Oruvi I le Dam Blvd. in orovi I le G08T Ci FECTIVE- n NESS RANKING 'ROPOSEDIMPROVEMENT PHASE OR PAOJECTI PROGRAM irSCAL, f i'ROpOS, YEAR COST FO cohstri;ctlott 198344 $9 COUNTY: ROU°CE NAW, . bUtU I62 UNpCi GiIOS$ I HOS e thisprojecthas u low ranking oh the Department's stdtewid prlority Ilsting.* However; Callfornla s allocation of 19664 1 Btr,nnmic"Atowth r f s increased from $2.1 mill ion to M6 mi l l lnhy with the uhderstanding (between the Detw+rtm"iits ConRresi;mdn Mirsoh, and the Federal Highway Adm nist"ratiotll that the 4dItlohal fu�lds would t ba allocated to this project. !A It obW appears that the Project Icahoot, be �,,oved quickly enough to capture' a binding t6mmitmeht for the Growth Center funds, wh1dh are targets of the Reagart Administration's budget oats. To keep the funds In California the Department proposer to cbmit them to othtsr eligible projects In the State (whieh gene'rdlly have a low 1'anking on the Department's priority ilsts), with the uhdaestanding that $5.5 ittillion in Prihlary or State cash be, provided for the Oroville project In subsequent years. Tt+tw Depdetment recommends 01being a oonditizan on'this prUleet, that all I additional fuhdiog beyond the $5.5 million to i:edet'al and ti$,5 m1Allon It, State m6tohing funds come from local sourcet If we assume, that the current cost estitnztd is acturd' about $2.6 -to I y Of local funding woulil ba neededi coat estimates for brldge projects tdhd to jui>p as construction data, approach; poM' exampid; the ono fat` the Glanalll gridgdialso In but+:e Cbuhty leapt from. $4o9 to $10.9 Witch between last ,June's adopted $'rIP and the updated vers' �r I + It released It! October. A slniilar lrldeo so in this projact's tot 6011.; place heavy burdens on local futtd3, 0 Tiiis project Is not in the 1950 STIh, froth the DOWtm009 perspective has low [a a statowide pri'ot`lty► and would requira very substahtial local funding. It does not merit inc`lusibn i•t the '1 91 STIP" Iis ranks only sdvehtyLsctt)h4 on, the pub~ld UtilitiesCettiti►Itfl6h1s,' prIOrity IM of eighty -fear gradit sOparatlbo projcets X V " re W on -="- LAND G� ,NATURAL 1^,'Ali, H' A N 0 ast\tjTY DE:�'ARTMENT OF PUBLIC MF{KS Ca CLAY CASTLeSr=HFpY, Director CO.,Klm. incl jinn 7 COUN'T'Y CENTER DRIVE, OROVTLLE, CALI'r'ORNIA 95965 +rt q 3'aleplyona: (916) 534.4681 Q�PI,- N. ly Dire AL0 June De GUty Director S, 198E Dean Meyer Pit 0- Bnk 966: ,State Hightsay 162 Hayfork CA 4U'ndez ass Project . C4lroad 9601 p vville, Butte Count Dear Dean: y ;i: hoe Nort . p You remember me from our visits at the Ni,nn Supervisors tieetin s. kern California County hams_ wh l gy. I believe we talked about etler conservation arl�i my solar e at Chesger lot The Nine Northern Cay- and I are looking year. �� y �,> rhrnia Countyzigineers foresard t a flinch t���h 'You at Hayfork on the 19th, home iotl 'Your home oatJtgould like to he 19ch. ever to ask your advice and :alk t he n tn L see you at Out Community anbt�ttleneckerai��oadd. W'th._a fedexal- "13coz omit Groiatfi Center" k y has nderpass with a nets one for the er pzadoto that_tae have trying to get through the underpays. Thi 23,CCO cars F p my comes b*a.lom." c Grnwth Center day funding a J once in a lifetime ,arid disappears - r or committed,.' s �te>cy soon �f i� is got usr�c President Reagan 4A not propositi ftind�ing after the than aur ro ect receive ax for thIs t g :.00t% ye ype of �:5u1' cello;. �... y ' _ ;pro u`tr. Our cotntnu:axt desczee b y � pn d_;' ea.Ve . place �.n the $�Zp .� .. to be built $ C,.ltran„ and bc�, r t hith far gett�u9 it to a Place on the STjp Cohere it can be^built. e Cali=,cans shares my concern You Probablyare abate of this concexn from CaXtt ons but r that our carBmunity and l could oto taould lice get this '-,-J: , ct inn Your e%ivibe ori that would allot4 it„ eonstr+uct erg. Can ydt he p? position t�ith the n1p "am sending a copy of th,;.s lette Lltan ttzF people z to others Coria have into of this 4.nsnmunity in northern d4lifornia rest: but serf `.ly no more To veriky the community con( etti x am enclosing a caPy of C►rov'zx , " Regitrnaransportatiozi'xal.�ting Agency; le s = ,► e,R C c vo .our Very truly "yotirs, CiC.�fsir �� all t td It Sulcy I�ast� eberr�r ' Director er�asor a acenx., yor Cxayton bFrryy rt pubic Work City o, 0rolle; 175 riantgomery Str�,et Oraville bwc .CAf;%too e3il, Leo. tam► Ta lba ties• .." tach Senator ke Joh nsr n �vx r. 959 5/t3o at nbatore Ca1tiri`! ll' b Boyd i �iati� t�ci� attach: �► _ (Revd • .. r 1980RTP DATE �x 5' ATE. HIGHWAY ELL'1tENT' State Estimated Cost Highway _ Pro'ect Descrxptiion CT(,ousa.nds)_ Prorit _..Route.:. ----_--�.-� aaa x; hway to 5ii tter.County Line $ 27000/$3,000 1.B^ 59 (Construct road section with ct 40 -foot full, channelization), $ $,2sa 2 99 (Upgrade. to four Pentz Road to C� o - lane expressway) Q.3 Mile st of Sacramento Avenue tc� s, as0 3. 32 ,Crier impt"n Creek shoulders, .tu (improve °- left-leftlane, bike lanes and s? gnats) • 32 Gianelli Bric�ee ,roaches' (Construct bridge and a .p' 5;. 162 Railroad Underpays ?arid A_pa�'oaches under- $ (Remove and replade zailroad passes-, Laiden to lour lanes) 70 `Yuba County tine o Ornvil,.,. le, at: $ 460' 6. Various; roadway to PLoda ro passing lanes) (Widentions 600 55 At Tassen Avenue 1 �• (Construct, interchange} $ 2,100 8 • �� S' Oyercrossin� (14iden, to four lanes to matche.�cis tin. and futuxe four -lane Highway alignment) 99 -hqsset HighrnaY *t}vercrossng Co $ 300 rid ---- (Signalize ;exLstang ramps) East 20th S't�eet Overcross�in $' 570 10. 59 (Cohstruct interchange ramps. Privately funded by Task Obdsultanks 'Inc, At 'East 8th and East _5th Street's $10�S00 1� 32 (Construct Utr derpass under Si'RR tracks) ,Avenue Undexcxossi,�; , Y 270 12. 99 �Sst aline (,i.gn tamps) hast Avenue Qud ' ;ros'siit 5bQ 13� S9 (signalite tampsf Rerr. 980 RTP _JPD T State 'Estimated Cost , Hi&,,wayouetvmds Pro'ect 'Descrition Priority ROtlte. 2,100 32 0.4 Mile: West of Li:ndo Chan-del to 14. 0;3 M%1e West of SaciamEmm lav,,_-n (Add 1egt-turn channelization and bike lanes) North of E,.-t- 20,th Street Overcr�& $ 505. i5•(Construct 59 pcdestri,an/bcycld over crossis:g strui:tiure) East 20th Street Over crossir� $ 900 16• 99 sig (Wi;den to four lanes and finalize _. ramps) TOTALCOST t SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY VEHICLE ANSURANCE QUESTIONNAIRE, ii Ir A social !service agency insuraAce study is currently in progress throughout the State of California. it is 'hoped that the outcome of this study will bring about improvement in the axfordability and availability of vehicle insuranuo for' social service agencies. Your participation in this important study it) eacantial to complete the work :undated by state legislation in AB 120, known as "The Social 'Service Transportation Improvement Act." Your individual responses will _too t strictly confidential and results of 'this questionnaire will be used to gencaeate " summary statistics only In order to complete this study on time, we must shave this questionnaire returned by May 29, 1981. Thank you very much., - -------------.----------------- ----------------------------------------------------- ---------------=----_---------------_--------W10 YS AFFEOVED BY THIS INSURANCE STUDY? W10 Social Service Agencies. Social service ag envies, tahethLr civic,, charitable (nonprofit) or government supported service organizations (Dial -A -Ride or Dial- - 'Lift) that provide transportation to clients incident to the social services sponsored by the organization, including special trips and outings are affected. This 'classification. includes, for example, automobiles (a ;generic term meaning Gars, station wagons, vans and biises) used, to transport: senior citizens or.other C lients to congregate meal cent`fxs, medical facilities, social functions, shopping centers; handicapped persons to work or rehabilitative programs; children to day care centers or Head Start programs; and aoy Scout or Girl.Scout,groups to ,planned Iactivit-ies (This description is not ux:ant to be restrictive; rather, it mentions 'several broad categories to help you understand the scope of.the study.) ,GENERAL INFORMATION y 1. Agency Name 2. Agency Address City ov-20 ` State 2i-22 Zip Code 23-27 Telephone ( ) c02)28,37 Ali Contact Person: (00* 0 6. Name`of person completing this questionnaire if. difterent from Contact Person: 6. Please list all, names used by your agora y in the 'last 5 Years (03)01-27 (05528-55 tn5)56-eo i ilF4,•+y�+i L.wiM q{irsi YrJ`�rI.w�Oiyn."iy:['q^rl,"1p'[lk..yl.iinw:3.'wSFYyw*�:v'+ii`►r.'L.41'Mil'.�k1a{.h4«r:.y�.M'�iY\+r Nil i'tM'.41iiM'l'fi.%'M�F,M eR \'w+1�it`ulusiµiiY%'3 ri. �4� i lbx�iki Ai � 1. �2. PLL ASC PROVIDE VEHICLE; It��"�URANCl INFORMATION ONLY% It you had rmre %hail one agent 'r�r moxa l than one lic in an calender ,IPS' Y Y yezl>r elC'eea lint -:811 of tchems i II xeleurance , Cartir�r office premiim �insurance AgiSnt� Address Citj► St&µPhone ;Crn�pnyj t!ee Policy N CoW 1981 ut/0� 11h2 , ,�.,,�,,,.,`...,..,• 13/1 1980 1 1T1 1 14!20 ry rvzx r 1979 r 23124 23/26- 29130 107 W'v 3313; _ VW W36 1917 4 1 Ati `631�t4 010' '1 fi AS _ _ c s3/s4 ' Oi101w20 112i� s ►I d�7E� Irrv�3a 2101-iq c^/+ci4d 2iet=e3 �teb-fid �17T-bo G ,t St dt bi5 ut CdMPG 'CI bt+� (?C' 9't1ZS S'I'i�bY `Y`I' xS NEGF5S11R�t 'rltAx $FIC 11b�?; iG"t'IDH Di;IL;1f;D C11M' •�'Ot 6Rti Y'>✓J112 roh ti SSI. " + S7'11NCE I N Mht;C 'I[1t; �r►ils sh�r bo rou Ma► Ct1N'1'hC'T itotiit zNslirsnr�c nc� &' !THANK VOO polt VbWk Ivt�tlhFi371't 2�kJ• 3 v, ,t aftCount, t_ tA14Q:: ofAiUr''.� ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California .9596; 916/554.4784 March 25, 1981 Chairman and Members RE: 1981 Proposed State Transportation California Transportation Commission Improvement Program 1120 N'Street (?STIP) Sacramento, CA 95814 Gentlemen Once again,'lhktq County has been shortchanged by e state highway program. For a number Of, years, low Butte County has been a,donor. 4unty in that county residents have braid more in gasi aline taxes than. they have received back in the form of state highw,ity expenditures within the county. The 1981 PSTIP, however, conta%ns by far the most in- e -citable distribution of state highway' funds experienced to date,, The entire 1981 PSTIP contains less than $600,000 i,h expenditures for state highway purposes in Butte County over the five-year STIP period'., if the old county iniriimums word rsupport e our othSTIP wwould be in Violationof the law. it is offensiie to; see so little t7e ate concerned that the Gianelli Bridge 'replacement project was deleted: from the S`fIP. The project, which was originally scheduled for PY 1981/82 in the 15$0 STIP, was moved to By 1982/83 in the 1980 OSTIP because of lead time problems, The 'project was then. p only hew faellities bxojects programmed deleted from the 1981 :PSTIP on the rempsenthat for 1981;/32 in the 1980 USTIP would be roarammed into the 1981 P5TlP, T(is pxemise., 3a applied to this pro;ject,, lacks sound, judgment. This project should be reinserted into, the STIP, WithoGianelli Bridge project,°the PSTIP contains only lump sum minor ptoorams Tot' Sutte�Count` y. Topping�. this list , an e:t end�.tLiwe oyer a five-year period of $150,000 for sifety it"provecneh:ts, followed by '$144,000 for maintenance of Caltrans lad buildings, $101,000 for roadway reconstruction and .1100,000 for operational improvement, xt is t t,W.y' 0Efeflsive to find that building maintenance is one of the leading pro;rams for the go'tt flue yeah. Ali exaitjinattaotl of state highway expehditur`as for bistricts 1, 2 and S shoos that the only d0dtty withOUt- a major project is Butte Couctty, - The 1981 PSTIP includes a major. P ed j eo't for evert othdt jcot nt� a (Rev. 8/8/90) 1980_RTP UPDATE STATE HIGHWAY. ELEMENT State Highway Estimated dost Priority Route Project Description (Thousnnds' 1• ro 99 Bir�._gjhighway to Sutter County Line $ 2,001/$3,000 (Construct 40 -foot roan section with full channelization) 2. 99 Pentz Road to Chico $ 8,250 (Upgrade,to four -lane expressway) 3• 32 0.3 Mile West of Sacramento.Avennuue to $ 1,050 Bik Chico Creek (Improve shoulders, left -turn lane, b -,,.e lanes and signals) 4, 32 Giane.11 Bridge $ 1p955 (Construct bridge and approaches) 5. 162 Railroad Underpasses and Aporoaches $ 3,651 Remove and replace railroad under- passes, widen to four lanes) 6 70 Yuba County Line.to Oroville at $ 460 Various Locations (Widen roadway to provide passing lanes) 7. 99 At Lassenen Avenue $ 600 (Construct interchange) 8 99 Skyway Overcrossing $ 2,100. (Widen to four lanes to match existing ' and future four -lane highway alignment) 91 99 Cohacset Highway Overcrossing $ 300 (Signalize existing ramps) loil 99 fast 20th Street Overcrossing $ 970 Construct interchange tamps. Privately funded by Task Consultants, Inc) ll• 32 At --East - .. 8th and East 9th Streets $10,500 (Constrct underpass under, SPRR tracks) 12. 99 East First Avenue 'Undercrossiti 270 (Signalize ramps) 13 99 East Avehod Undertrossiri $ 500 (Signalize ramps) } - (7/21/80) g (Rev. 8/8/80) 1980 RTP DATE STATE IG T�UP+JAY L _LT State Estimated Cast Highway Pro ect� ptian (Thousandsl_ Pry fort .Route $ 2,000 0�.4 Mile West of Lindo Channel to 14. 32 0.3 Mile West of Sacramento Avenue (ldd left -turn channelization and bike Lanes) 'North of East 20th Street Overcrossing 505 15• 99 (Construct pedestrian/bicycle over - crossing structure) , East 20th 8tr yet_,_, Ove ossign $ 900 16. 99 (Widen to foul: lanes and signalize ramps) TOTAL COST ;,....... $373011 S 4...'u .Y