HomeMy WebLinkAboutLOWER WYANDOTTE ROAD-PUBLIC PROJECT - PUBLIC WORKS• a '
p
1 ,
o
•
,
e r
' �
• y1
•
I
' � , t
J
•
µG5,
P
X14-•
.
•
r
,
NFOTxCI, QF DETERMINATION
t � L
To; 17 Secretary for ResourcesJAN 1980
1415 Ninth Street, Roam 1311 5
Sacramento, CA. 9581.4 CLARK A. NELSON, County Clork
I
X JACINTMO
By boPuty
/7 County Cleric
County of Butte FROM: (Lead Aggency)
18Biro cx={,� Environmc,zttaal eU1
urovi p` a int
U, ua izorn:Lr:c >:,
.� 7 t}oun�k,v Center U°r,����
Orov Cali oi,r�:La..-25a-1 L
--- _
SUBJECT:- Filing of Notice of Determine:tit��n in Gomnliance c�74th
Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public R -sources Code
EVB Lcg # 79-09-21-011
k'ro,1 ec C -TI t e
bower Wyandotte Road - Public Praiect
g s e, Numb ez - ---�—�
atate Clearin hou elf submitted to St8—tte C ear'ng EI:ouse
Contact: Pel rr s�n�q
N L4 1/ 1l W 1s ..ii l.Y�.F. 4 ;
I r ,X , p otte Nun er
J'ro7rector
cct Lacation —. -- ._
- Existing Lower Ityandotte Road between Di—strict
�C,�n�.er Drive �F�Poot}fill Boulevarcl� Ot'ov7 �1.
k ro7 ec.t Uesoripton:
a:dening and curve realignment of Lotiver Wyandotte Road.,-
This is to advise that the E'Iut to CoWIt,,,, w Board of Supervisors
has rode the Eol1owin� determittat ions Lead Agency
regardin the above-described
Project+
1, Thero; ect /% will P 7 have a significant ei:fect on the,
will not
environment
put,IU4�nt to the P , ,P .. ` P ''P od for ti i .- project
An. Iativ�.xonmcnt�'1.plov.i.sxotRi� oJ.�Gt1n.�1: nn�lti�r �-
tva.., certified as
required by Secy tiot 15035 (s") , 1/1 .Call Cot-na.a Adminis tra ti,vL
Code.
` y p
j tAortit�>�yovsir�rt�
c�ti tfK� ire GYxcd forthi„ nz;oject pursuant
Declata-
tion may be c atr',inc 1 -It-tlic Env � nm �ttay of �l ev octvDc�ina'trttent
7 COUnty Center Dr. tv�, Ovo\rIllo Cali orhi 9a"9G5.
:i A 'l�OLICo Ot EX"Ittint°i.on filed :.cclic,- kh �
r c�nl, 1"i���i Sttvl.t"oniTenLn1 2:eview projoct is,
G�
APpo'n
clip
it
P�i,�e 1
Of
i
4. A statement of Overriding Consideration /%`was, was not,
adopted for this project.
5. Mitigation measures adopted
impacts of thea rovedp �y the Lead Agency to reduce the
PP pro' are:
NoAe
Eavl 14 Director
-----------------
. �._
��r �:J�',��,ii�'E•at��td'�. ����.��1,.�`�'r �ai.i't'��7�,��"'
US
.0
APPENDIX G
NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL XMACq
I. NOTIO' IS HEREBY GIVEN that the project described bOlow has
been reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public TtesourC,es Code
21100, et seq.) and, a determination has been macro that it will
not have a significant effect upon the + Wironment..
2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Log # 79-09-21x01
Public Project #23S11-79-1 Widening and curve realignment
of Lower Wyandotte Road.
3. LOCATION OF PROJECT:'
Foothill Boulevard., Road between. District Center Drive
Existing Lower Wyandotte
4. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT:
Butte County Public Works
#'7 County Center Drive
Oroville, California 95965
5. MITIGATION MEASURES:
6. A copy of the Environmental. Review Director' sinit al study
regarding the environmental effect of this project is attached.
This study was
.;adopted as presented.
Adopted with changes. Specific mo.d: fications and
supporting reasons are attached.
74 A public haaring on this Negative Declaration was held by the
decision making body.
Nearing body Butte County - Board °of Siper�riosrs
Date of Determination 12 -
Determination!
On the basis of the Environmental Director t s2.1itialos study,
the information presented. at hearings, comments received the
proposal and our own knowledge and independebt research:
Appendlix G page I of 2
i
We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLAIRATION in �
hereby adopted.
We find that the project could have a Significant etfect
on the environment but will not in this case because of
attached mitigation measures described in item
above
which are by this reference made conditiO110 of project
approval. A conditional NEGATIVE DECLARA►,TION is hereby
adopted.
DATE: JAN 3 0 1980
Signature L.�.e,►
Rdliert E. Lemke
Name
Chairm.an, Board of Supervisors
T3.t1e
d .A.pendx Cx page c►o
- r
0
APPENDIX F
ENVIRONMENTAL IHECKLIST VOR
(To be completed by Lead Agency) ;
Z. BACKGROUND
8RD Log # 79-09.-21-01
.
1. Name of Proponent Publi c �^Torks
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent.
Butte County Department of Public Works
7 Countv Oenter Drive
uroyLlle, Oal1fQr_n3.a-_999()65
554-4266
3. Date of Checklist Submitted
4. Agency Requiring Checklist Environmental Review I)D rtmorl
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Public Project #c3911,'179 ;
Widening and curve realignment of Lower Wya.eaas�.
II ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required"
on
on attached sheets.)
YES MAYBE
N0
1, Earth. Will the proposal result in significant,:
a'.
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b.
Disrupt<iots, displacements, com-
pactior or overcovering of the soil?
c.
Change in topography or ground sur-
face relief features or removal of
topsoil?
d,
bestruttion covering or modifica
tion of any unique geologic or
physical. features?
e.
Increase in wind. or water erosion
of soils, either on or off the site.
f:
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sends, or changes in silta
tion, deposition or erosion which
may modify the dh.apnel of a river o,,,
stream or the bed of the 'ocean or
ar: bay; :i,n? et or latre7+'
g,
Loss of pti,'me egri.cul.turally pro-
ductive :soils outside designated;
urban aveas ry
Appendix E - page i
of
YDS MAYBta
No
h. Exposure of people or property to:`�'
geologic hazards such as earthquakes,
landslides, miidslides, ground, failure,
or similar hazards?
7. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a.
Substantial deterioration of
ambient or local air quality?
b.
The. creation of objectionable
odors, smoke or fumes?
c.
Significant alteration of air
movement, moisture or tempature,
or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
3. Water, Will the proposal result in substantial;
a.
Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements?
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface water runoff?
k
c,
Deed for off-site surface drait'ial.e
improvements, including vegetation
removal, channelization or culvert
installation?
d.
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood
triters,'
e.
Change itt the amount of surface
x
water k n, any water body''
f,
Discharge into surface waters, or
.
in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not;
1'imi.ted to temperature, dissolved
Oxygen or turbidity?
g,
Alteration of the direction or m
rate of flow of ground waters? W�
h:
Change in the quantity or quality
Of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals
or through interception of sn
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
a►
,4
Appondix l: page 2
of 0
I
YES MAYBE NO
i'.
Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies?
:l.
Exposure of people or property
to
water related hazards such as
flooding?
4. Plant'Life. Will the proposal result
i.n--sdbstantialc
a..
Loss of vegetation or ch
diversityof s change in the species
or number.
of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, cops,
microflo-ra and aquatic plants)?
b ,
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of plants?
c.
Introduction of new species of
plants into an
area, or in a barrier
to the Normal replenishment of
existing species?
d.
Reduction in acreage of any agri-
cultural crop?
5. Animal Life, Will the proposal result
in
substantial;
a.
Change In the diversity of species,
p
or numbers of ani species of
animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fist! and shell-
fish, benthic organisms, insects
or
micro f auna) 7
t,
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
c,
Introduction of new species of
animals into an area or result in
a barrier to the migration or
movement; of animals?
c1 t
Reduction of, encroachment upon, or
deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
Appoidi x P,
page 3 6f 9
YES MAYBE
NO
6.
Noise. Will the proposal result in
substantial:
a. Increases in noise levels?
Si
b. Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
7.
Li ht and glare. Will the proposal.
pro uce sir;ni i.cant light or glare'?
8.
Land Use. Will the proposal result
in a significant;
a, Alteration of the planned land use
'
of an area, or establish a trend,
which will demonstrably lead to such
Alteration?
b ,Confli.ct With uses on adjoining
properties Or co if lict; with
establ —ched recreational., educa-
tional, religious or scientific
uses of an area?
9,.
Natural. Resources, 14ill the proposal
result in substantia].,
a, Demand for, or increase in the rate
of use of any natural resources?
b, Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
10:
Risk of; Upset. -Does the proposal
Involve a risk of an explosion or
,
the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil'
j
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset
conditions?
11
Po ulat oh i Will the proposal
signi+ icantl:y alter, the location,
distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an
area or physically divide an
established community?
1,
xousin , t+Til1 the proposal
si�.1M icant,l.y affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional
housing?
r
0 Aripendi-kF -
c
page 4 of
YES MAYBE
NO
•k
13.
Transportation/Circulation.. Will the
proposal result in;
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
b. Significant effects on existing
parking facilities, or demand for
AOK
new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing
�.
transportation systems?
d, Significant a.ltetatiorls to present
patterns of circulation or movement
of people and/or goods?„
e.Alterations to waterborne, rail or
airtraffic?
fease in traffic hazards to motor
�
vehicles; bicyclists or pedestrians?
14,
Public Services Will the proposal have
an e7fect upon] or result in.a substantial
need for new or, altered governmental
services in any of the following areas t
Agkk
a, Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c Schools?
d. Parks or other recrea't'ional
facili.t es?
e,, Maintenance of public facilities r
including roads?
f Other governmental services?
V
15,
Encs ._. ; Will the proposal, result in,
� mounts of fuel
a, Use of substantial. a
or. energy?
gy
b. Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy► or
require the development of n,.w
sources of energy?
,.
16,
utilities. Will the proposal: result
in a�neeci for net, systetis, or sub-
stantial alterations to the folloWitig
Utilities;
Appendik p
w page .5 of 9
YES MAY -E
NO
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
•
c. Water?
d. Sewer (will trunk line be ex',ended
providing capacity to serve new
development)?
e. Storm water drainage?
17.
Human Health. Will the proposal
result in
a. Creation of any health hazard or
botettial health hazard (excluding
Mental health)?
b. exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
18.
Solid Waste, Will the proposal result
in any significant impacts associated
with solid waste disposal or litter
control "
1.9.
Aesth, Will the proposal. result
3.F�t 6 lir _ruction of any public
desi nra or recognized scenic vista
open to public, or will the
propos, *moult in the creation of an
aesthe ly offensive site open to
20.
Recreatt, j, Will the proposal result
in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of eXa. ,tiftg public recrea-
tion facilities?
21,
Archeolo;ical/Historical, Will the
proposal result iii an alteration of
a significant archeological or
'
historical site, structure, object
or building?
22,
Mandatory Findings of Significance,
A, Does the project have the potential
h,
J
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
speaies, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
*Appesndix V
page 6 of 9
YES MAYBE NO
sustaining levels threaten to
eliminate
a plantor animal com-
munity, reduce the number
or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered
plant
or animal or eliminate important
examples of the
major periods of
California history or prehistory?
Ahk
b. Does the project have theotent al
to achieve short
term benefits to
the detriment of publicly adopted
long. -term environmental goals?
Does the project have impacts which
are individually:limited, but
cumulatively considerable? )ectr
may impact
on two or more separate
resources where the impact
on each
resource :is relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of
those impacts
on the environment is
significant,)
1
d4 Does the project have environmental
effEacts which will
cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirect'ly?
r;ex�dxx F
page 7 of 9
•r`i •i rP.� ..-,... r ti.tnnun�V!! k1 "'*'4. .i . Y ` 1 it
' ° � � '�+� �• b ...._..«.., rr . R r • •. � � ( � �+ �, h ..,stn w..� 4 . � �� r' i - :n.... �� .s
_ ,' Y' t"o *•(l�P. ,r R , • SLS% �,.Yj e
. Imo;.: �{ ,.✓�� i WA^'C?tIF "'�.'" � t.• t}.��.` �c` � i I�yt ti'-; � i� t{ � 1 :af h•.���t � .
• II
• a, " 4 t t
}}�
l..t
I t ' R. �rt a •1„�^J� rA .`.. r.. ( " t 's a r s 11 .:Y �n C yt v "'.69
be
,.
WUgr�x>abe yyi +, . re t✓/% 6 r� r, .t!'r
�� � N 1i�¢ � �' r tis r � � J rx _,r e. • yr ,—�.`� ,- '�... /I �...
�- t � t, a •->,tr,Ir • Y '..' 'y �� f �. 6,1 "� .•�a •",r ' r
- j ��"�'�f• i °�,... .i. �. ..T .t r �yy � �, �u.�'ta' , i ' i i /„",.t t� � � {��.
+ • x'• � N •�•¢rr 5.. " � 7} • � V ��f C11 j •fNt., r4 �� •w .
�' � U . , ' v + t t .,.�y �r' . 11..l1�o i<i.!! � i i ". Z t.• 1—• . t'
��r+r'•-
}
I ! �- �.b. ' /y , a ,'}.. r ,� �. �\ 1 t r�,• ,,r 1 Yr 1 �.��(� >rllk
cA,cr
- 11}` °—' !'{,i,r. r- �/ a,�al, Y C .� .o° .19�t♦
J15
r
ORO
VILLE
1'. r' ''ry- re.... ' ' 3 ts.rs a•y"\ -tR Z ^^
//�1 �r _ .jury R y a '�irr•,r, L e� ..
Y �ii .�A.� 1 1 r' 'd s�ii/ �1 3 "'" (;� • a
i y-�rr� t At4lllf, 4sCG/,�A�.fs
• � I 1 V6 t 1 D I"'• »^ • .., r s'Y"y �Zf Ir� '` ri a'� iIR F'li ' ! R F r'a
�, 'rf I/aA'raDOr% O" i rt •' ' ,.r �•;+ i !lrf - w� �jnrw. 1lrt f .YrCP:..^w,tl• - 1 �Caht ;�i
Y �' Forrpoy.r B2 >�' �'" r �y ""!,.�� Y�, wags `te�+••t�a� r"' , �' X'
a,r-
Qr ibGGsoi,laM+, r + \ �7 ` 162 r,r „••r` -T `"'="rti'rurle
• IM� � c' "41A . •, a A {� � T _. , : �ti2 y + `'��, � � �+Y!1!! 9[.\ r.� ..
r ' '
t f
. � � ,�' "'trrs. • .!t �� � r ! 1 J+f " , !1,"t t(.i rf n Y� i!1 � � � � ` M' .� —� y�
�r S Y 1 .J •'• 1 `,.. w'roP+Y" Y��'� ��r M !� fA ?~ c,�.• �t�~8
Y _
y i , •
F.4ro'iltr r ���
T L��
.�, U M
a • Vr r""°^�"^cn
.}•� s.•"uir ti� A�'1, y� ` `� r • R •a `�, l+r� ti r• .
rC •s y; a� .Q�ry W C7n+]Lolir.• a\l t+IF'lSSiafr:r z r
♦. t S a r/r rjtp� C� / Lrt ` „Y•..' ''•'N;r r xV V t ; MgµV Ts
•r ..,h., {C Ly, 1•� l` r r �. ` o L _ {{ it t �'r.:
: � � f r i .. f ti4 '•
:
• Baa. „ � .., q , !,'�: ,� '• f� .' #� � Q. t _. ,�. � �..^ ��
, biTN[7 tiFalse. ?s r' K � `!m r�1
1 yg r�A#FlrnO +- ,. � •s.0 � 1, `M �y . � h�� , t Jar
" . r
x x x. r t r � :/' � R+ �' �•i�" • t... "^� .'.frir, 4.? ���:�, •'iF�
w .
., Gaya
•+"� ;:1 . �' �' h ..' , r F '.•�,1j Ki
Ix,.t; � a r F , ` F°# •:N. 1� c' 20
( ' • .f' '•.y 9":�ri'k * u a + Ei+„u *.YJf *. & � q y o- " •.y M
• {i r
r. .rift
11aftg6r
r
j �„'�' � x %r �H a, '� ..•* r'.:`" +rr rsl�an, +h,'tn� ,,�r . �,!'R.�
o r... 0 _. r a as+ r v . • _yA.. _ . iGr.,J.. 4- �' o + � ..- &US
LOCATION MAR -
j
TM ; � '�; "'•`='t'+`•"•°"•"" �� °..• `.�«.-•--. ; � �� %o'er`
JR Q
�.QWIER '�I'Y�4MDq'TI� -
FOOTWILL , BLVD. TQ. wcncur ..►• ,e, .y
If
I" r. � anll 'w � ��''� f �..✓" T 17 N
SM', -CENTER. ®R, :
6!�.,�*,�: a�'1 , ase
p ��rr p��1
R��GV a h} ` • r" � r ikd�owhtiAlt.�.'t o, � Yy! r{ti " 4
F_ PT NO- 2 35 l -`a s,..L r
L.u,.L..:��.r:......wl.. , � ia3 , a3�� � ! . " i ,� �!"•- woiMb wG''8.✓` •+a �1:. ��� u. r. ,,.� s
oA+t .i1►►Iau g�@' ' �iJj,,. �! ' 4f # i�4 C+p kbn�S►+ll[ p `� , w X �: (V,
..Ix 4 ,.Y,�.?ii'Y'
Applicantc_pubZie rkq._Io
els, son' s Parcel �1
DISCUSSION ER7
- og
A. Project. Descri�ptiora
I- Type of Pro j e,, t :2-bli c pro
Dent, of Public Works
2. BriefDescrlpb:i ,.
1-0210-r}+�'wndotte gojAea3.n,s� anr� �,yrve re�� . nmF:n,_of Cb6 m.I.es of
T-- -. ado g uis3.tion of additional rights of iay.
P Loration_ axidoRoad between llistrict Cento
a d s r�. e a
s
�L.._. nd
�5 and 36 of T Zg N 4E M D M.
Proposed Density of Development
5. :Amount of Impervious Surfacing ns - � cant
6. Access and Neare -t Public Roaas
C ) � NA
Mothod of Sewage Disposal: NA
8. Source of Water Supply:, NA
9. Proximi -6y of poorerLines :
ID. Potential for further land divisions and, development: N9
B. Environmental. Setting
.P_hysical Eraviro�nt
1Terrain
a. Genera. Topographic Character: Nj exist] road gradesower
SUr, n n ding 't and j
,b Sjodes., pL-J, .1. t arra v,
"q%
C. El:u+ration:_`About "'g0 feet above Se�Z `t..
di, .Limiting Pc,ic'tors . Nor P
2. Soils
a. Types and O arae tern sti,cs : GOVIdin -Auburn; Assn c3 a+ion ero c3.ed
Sbil t e 3.s_ Cues VTT. �.
- � (CZaes Txl•wU dust tl t)
b. Limiting yaotors: Erosion 'ogtentlal rc.ted higrh.
.,• .. ...
Natural. Hazards of the Land
a
Earthquake Zonae: ro r')ct Zocat on is ad ecent to .the western eds�e o
b Erosiolz Potentia he C evsland H. 'lisp 1 t 7
_- X41 ' e a 0 S`Gudies Zone.
t, r.
i po�tent,fjal: to"t oderate �pausit�e Soil potential.
c Landsl.�.de
4. Rydrol.ogy
a. Surface Water: Tkiere are "g 6ii-t-goo Watstgoiy4
A pp etdi
ix :r
Page '�a of 9
Discussion Continued. - - -
b. Ground Water: xA
c Drainage Charactori sticaRoadside drains e
d. Annual Rainfall (normal):.-
e.
normal):Abe. Limiting Factors: None -
5. Visual/Scenic Quality
6. Acoustic Quality: Good._Rj-Rall Mrg,.�-ham.
?. Air Quality:- 0ocasona.7
=Locls . of gii�
$iC71.0�'w �; r��A'raa iriflrto�r,ed
Biological Environment: by valley air character.
8. Vege 4,,ation: _Fo 11-
grassland communities. Scattered Olive orchards � .
9 Wildlife Habitat: �Tbner SO71nY'ArT;y a 7„
ne
Cultural Environment
10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the, area: Previously
w
111. DISOUSSZON OF ENV1ROMMNTAL EVALUATION
Summary: The project will consist of widening and realigning some of
the curves along a 0.6 mile
Portion of Tower Wyandotte Road, She site is
shown on the Project map and includes that 0.6 miles of roadway bettreen
District Oenter Drive and Foothill Doule-raid,
is being
taken at this time to improve safety conditions Talongrthis section ofr~
roadway in the face of increasing vehicular use in the area. Additional
rights-of-way will need to be acquired by the county from landowners along
the roadway. Encroachment on existing parcels will not be significant
sincepoles, ma311hnxes etc,this
stealone le rivelylarge. Fencing, utility
p sizes in
to be aaquiroj. Replacement of privatePropertyg-of-way which will need
(fences, mailboxes etc.)
effect by the project will be undertaken by Butte Oounty during the
Project- Utility pole lines which are effected must be relocated by
the uti?.ity company unless they have an existing easement which states
other,vrise.
Impacts include
1•• b, c. There will be some grading and soil disturbance along the m"lotin`
path of the roadway. g
� . e. 'There MwJ be some small increase it erosion due to ground disruption:
along the roadside.
l f+s 3'• c• There are at least two surface drainage courses Which are
passed un,demeath Lower Wyandotte Road along this 046
mile seot;ion. These are passed under the roadway in existing culverts.
The existing culverts are adequate and will continue to be utilized: ..
in their present loeations, There will be no alterations to the existing
drainage b p g
courses due to the soil distu..bance in the face of eros these drainage
g pa tern. There may be some soil deposition along
rated as high. ion potential
Note: The ,roadway --realignment Project will provide a ood o
for culvert inspection and maintenanoe (cleaning,etc. opportunity
determined necessary upon inspection. � should it be
roadside drainage which might cause obs
le removedculvegsmaoa7gsahbe
removed at this time. y
1. h The c 4 is adjacent to tri:: OlOveland IJJ118
Zone fault 'special Studies
2 6 _ There. _.
g o be temporary e
operates ,,.t qualityyimpacts while heavy equipment
in the area. �'ir,i',e may be concentrations of vehicular
eldggions, paving odors,, ob►�;e, 4+0_
1 "c')f There trill be temporarily
increased traffic hazards along the
roadway during con,structIon.
166 a b. Refer to Summary.
21. The site is a previously digcurbed area for the meet
any archeological or hi tor;.��1al artifacts of significaftb beSunu d
ca �
y` g �a .fied archeulogiat should be consulted
04rthe at
construc'ti,on qn,
immed3.at e.�.
.._....
Append � � a e 8 of
., p g
'e
ZV. DETERMINATION
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On thsis of this initial evaluation;
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a sig.,, ficant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION
i,.s rEcommended.
[] I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
have been added to the project. A N80ATIVE DECLARATION
IS RECOMMENDED
Q I find the proposed project MAY have a significant
effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is required.
(Signature)
'ori ENVIRON14ENTAL REVIEW DBPAR'NP11T
Reviewed by.
Earl D Felson
environmental Review Director
AppL§hdiX F page 9' of x