Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MUP 00-15
PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE #: MUP00-15 PROJECT TYPE: Minor Use Permit APPLICANT: Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca ADDRESS: 4700 Northgate Blvd., Suite 160, Sacrameriio, .CA 95834 OWNER: David and Nell Stephens ADDRESS: 4192 Stone Valley Court, Chico, CA 95973 REPRESENTATIVE: N/A ADDRESS: N/A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Minor Use Permit to colocate three flush -mounted panel antennas at the 80 -foot level on an existing 100 -foot tall lattice tower. Four equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower. PROPERTY ZONED: C-2 (General Commercial) LOCATED: on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 1,000 'eet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico. AP#: 006-400-056 TOWN/AREA: Chico GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial 1. Application complete: Amount: $ 1,064.00 Receipt #: 18436 2. Comments sent to: E{iD, GQck&VI, czi ) F)04,kic_ Wot'est &n Co 3. Comments received from: 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 6. Assigned To: S Q 7. Environmental Determination: t . State Clearinghouse No: Subject to Fish & Game: No Categorical Exemption-CEQA# _-Z Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. -CEQA # 15061.(bx3) Other 8. Staff Report: Project Video: N0 9. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: 10. Publication Notice Written: lb Display Ad Prepared: 11. Notices Mailed: - �' Number of Notices: 12. Newspaper Publication Date: 7 �d� % 0 /C J P G B 13. Planning Commission Hearing(s): 3 Action taken: Special Conditions: Commission Resolution No. 14. Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: 15. Type Minor Use Permit/Send for signature: 16. N.O.E. / N.O.D. / APPENDIX G: 17. Send validated Minor Use Permit: 18. Assessor's Memo: Ordinance No: Adopted: Fish & Game Fees Paid: Yes No 19. Copy of Minor Use Permit / Variance to Planning Technician: Mericom Corporation, c/oTom De Luca, proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts and Minor Use Permit to install three flush -mounted panel antennas centered at the 80 -foot level on an existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower and four equipment cabinets at the base of the tower on property zoned C-2 (General Commercial). The property is located on the east side of the Esplanade, approximately 1,000 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico. APN 006-400-056 (SB) (MUP 00-15) It was moved by Commissioner Lambert, seconded by Commissioner Mooney, and unanimously to approve the Minor Use Permit for Mericom on consent subject to the findings and conditions listed below: Adopt a Negative Declaration with the following -findings: A. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, that said study did not identify any potential significant environmental effects, and that a Negative Declaration is proposed. B. Find that the, Planning Commission has considered the proposed Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the public review process. C. Find, on the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study and any comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the Mericom Corporation Minor Use Permit project will not have a significant effect on the environment. D. Find that the proposed Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement and analysis of the County, which is the lead agency. E. Adopt the Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts, with no mitigation measures, as detailed in this agenda report, and authorize the Chair to sign. II. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a "de minimus" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5. is not recommended. III. • Recommend approval to the Planning Commission of Minor' Use Permit 00-15 for Mericom Corporation, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit A and subject'to the following findings: A. That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General'Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building Division, the Butte County Fire Department, and the Butte County Air Quality Management District. The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Commercial and is zoned C-2. The Commercial land ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 MINUTES 0 SEPTEMBER 14, 2000 ■ PAGE 1 ■ 0 • use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. The C-2 zone allows colocation of communication facilities with approval of a Minor Use Permit. B. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses,- residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas will not increase the height of the existing tower or extend beyond the existing antennas. 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property, and. no additional services or utilities are required. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The project site is already developed with a 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The proposed antennas'to be mounted on the existing tower will not have a harmful effect upon the neighborhood character. The radio-frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very little vehicle traffic will be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment shelter. The communications facility is unmanned and only one to two site visits per month will be requited after construction. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed: The site is ideally suited for the project because the proposed antennas will be mounted on the existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The project will not have an impact to any agricultural operations. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use will cause any other relevant impact. C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ SEPTEMBER 14, 2000 ■ PAGE 2■ D. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Chapter 24, Section 262, of the Butte County Code. Conditions of Approval: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height they will be located. 2. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County and any "other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. 3. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess ofthirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 5. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health_ 6. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 7. ' . The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained :-oad capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 8. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes 9. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective Sate of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 10. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human,exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing'near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES 0 SEPTEMBER 14, 2000 ■ PAGE 3■ RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a. radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute suff_cient grounds. to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to :,each his/her conclusion. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging t-:) the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original ` condition within thirty (30)'days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 13. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 14. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street ir- the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 15. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequ-,ncy (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 16. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 17. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 18. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site planis on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit E" and date-stamped June 1, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 19. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 MINUTES 0 SEPTEMBER 14, 2000 ■ PAGE 4■ 20. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. Building Division: 21. Building permits required for antennas and equipment cabinets. Engineer design calculatior_s are required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings when additional antennas are installed. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ SEPTEMBER 14, 2000 ■ PAGE 5■ B Mericom Corporation, c/oTom De Luca, proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts and Minor Use'Permit to install three flush -mounted panel antennas centered at the 80 -foot level on an existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower and .four equipment . cabinets at the base of the tower on property zoned C-2 (General Commercial). The property is located on the east side of the Esplanade, approximately 1,000 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico. APN 006-400-056 (SB) (MUP 00-15) Mr. Betts gave a brief summary of the project. He said the tower was originally created in 1998. The hearing was opened to the public. Tom De Luca was present to answer questions. The hearing was closed. Mr. Parilo concurred with staff s recommendation to recommend to the Planning Commission that the Minor Use Permit for Mericom Coportation, MUP 00-15), be approved subject to the findings and conditions listed below. I. Recommend that the Planning Commission adopt a Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, that said study did not identify any potential significant environmental effects, and that a Negative Declaration is proposed. B. Find that the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Negative Declaration, together with comments received' during the public review process. C. Find, on the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study. and any comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the Mericom Corporation Minor Use Permit project will not have a significant effect on the environment. D. Find that the proposed Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement and analysis of the County, which is the lead agency. E. Adopt the Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts, with no mitigation measures, as detailed in this agenda report, and authorize the Chair to sign. II. . The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a "de minimus" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5. is not recommended. III. Recommend approval to the Planning Commission of Minor Use Permit 00-15 for Mericom -Corporation, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit A and subject to the following findings: ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING 0 MINUTES - AUGUST 23, 2000 ■ A. That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building Division, the Butte County Fire Department, and the Butte County Air Quality Management District. The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Commercial and is zoned C-2. The Commercial land use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. The C-2- zone allows colocation,of. communication facilities with approval of a Minor Use Permit. B. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas'will not increase the height of the existing tower or extend beyond the existing antennas. 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property and no additional services or utilities are required. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The project site is already'developed with a 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The proposed antennas to be mounted on the existing tower will not have a harmful effect upon the neighborhood character., The radio- frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very little vehicle traffic will be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment shelter. The communications facility is unmanned and only one to two site visits per monthwill be required after construction. 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed: ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ IVIINUTES - AUGUST 23, 2000 ■ T The site is ideally suited for the project because the proposed antennas will be mounted on the existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The project will not have an impact to any agricultural operations. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use will cause any other relevant impact. -C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. D. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Chapter 24, Section 262, of the Butte County Code. Conditions of Approval: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height they will be located. 2. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County and any other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. 3. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from,a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 5. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal - system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. 6. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 7. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 8. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. IN _ - ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING -M MINUTES -AUGUST 23, 2000 ■ 9. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 10. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards .for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current'standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 11 All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 13. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as -approved for the life of the Facility. 14. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES - AUGUST 23, 2000 ■ 15. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the. County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 16. The Facility shall be. secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 17. 'Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 18. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit E" and date-stamped June 1, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 19. Prior to use .of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 20. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. 21. Building permits required for antennas and equipment cabinets. Engineer design calculations are required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings when additional antennas are installed. It was noted that this hearing will be put on the Planning Commission's Consent Agenda on September 14, 2000. The decision by.the Planning Commission will have a :10-day.appeal period. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES - AUGUST 23, 2000 ■ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be rovided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME ( U applicant is ditfe=t ftom owner an aMdavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL M�r'con� �0 De-L,.,,-,,- N 501 0060-q00 -o 0 ADDRESS. CITY, STATE &ZIP CODE: FILENUMBOL- X00 r /i -� l d . S�, � !!a 0�xtG.ct,M oMcE use NAME OF PROPOSED PRO ©� (V �) TELEPHONE LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major craw streets and Address, if any ) Li 390.2 s LGKG •: ;;r;%y ' •"••.,:'�.%::. �-r�,>.:;�i:.fiL�N GRAL INFORMATION REQUIRED t- ..�. _ !'I�+:r:,.�Y'*. ��.il" - _S�•- '-�+i�'%'b�f 11'`'.•i..�:::d':..4>':•-r.�7'a=». t '?.' .r'•9p:P:�`:i'. OWNER'S NAME � TELEPHONE ADDRESS: _ CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE ZONE GENERAL PIAN `< E}Q GLAND USE SIZE SIZE (a Sgmwc Feet arAare ) .�. IX1STIYG STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRU(e Feet ) P14c� ar►"nets ;Zr;Z Bo ` lei-c•( d— `;%� DO a tDScy -6it74CGbry (ems One) (Chat One) A114 ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICAiTON REQUESTED .,,•-� .•,::,;,ta-. ,.. - Y�r• ...cam;,,= _ "'.-*�.:,, • , ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP y? ❑ REZONE ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP [3 USE PERMIT RECEIVED ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ;1MINOR USE PER.WT ; ? JUN 0 8 20M ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ VARIANCE ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ MINOR VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER =; ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN '• ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ OTHER -. •.iia, _ ro:'�+�.:, x••;��:7.�`:z.:::+ •'r.:T•:,.M1 .. - PROJECT DESCRIPTION %;..:•:- _�"�-:,''>„'. -'_. ;�.."". - _ .�..g, ' , .•, .`' ..••• �. FULL OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for land division, describe the number and size of parcels.) L:y 100 M Dr% o o l/ BO` lek4�e4 o ICA—: ` k !D. S ` G�— r GCLvi I► �-i�S . �Ll G L re)#-!L 410%12 w, 'eK s4iti ' OWNER CERTIFICATION I Ltx t u -Y THAT I AN(PRESENTLY THE LEGAL. OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PRO?ERTY. FL'RTHER. I ACK-NOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE ASE ACCURATE (If an agent u to be authorized. ezeLute an affidavit of authori=ion UW uiclude the afTtdsvit with thu applicstion.) DATE: >C'/Z10� SIGNATURE:/��� 0 .0 COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed 5 12 S�GYS General Information: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or cteveloper, and/or project sponsor.Marr'nit COr q100 rJ o r k -c .�. ELIO— �t. ll00 �GC.rGInG�.-��o. G�f . 4SBs `'i 2. Address of project: u 390,2 N. 5;-' s nIp- hcrl-e_ Assessor's Parcel Number: 000 -q00 -057(a 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project DPi TplL CG.... C.(-7Doli o o, R,�a - e- LS���. sem►• k. 160 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: S. Existing general G 6. Existing zoning district G - -Z- 7. 7. How is land currently used? . eJe- COYhku",n' Ci 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this fprm Is A -h e� n.,, Lam,,. , r c 4 BD ` 1,-,u e. Project Description: for this projec-, includi . IL" •r. -t'. - 9. Site size: Z, (Acres/Sq. Fee 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: ��� Compact: To:al: 11. Plans attached Yes —No 12. Proposed development schedule ���►� �nGv' 20a 13. Associated projects Ai 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. til hor 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sale area and loading facilities. AIIA- 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. A11,+ 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 1 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 2 18. If institutional, Indlcate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy; loadinc facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. /Vllt 19. tf the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state thi; and indicate cty why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach a; Exhibit Alm Are the following Items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checker . yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residen0al �- areas or public lands or roads. _ 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of projecL 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. — f 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. — — 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. _ 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). _ 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). _ 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 2 0 Environmental Setting: Ouch brief desc dpdon) S,ee, 0 4-a",ek PrDjeC, 32. Describe the project she as tt adds before the project, including Information on topography, soil sta,:iltty,. plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any 9*dng structures on fie site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including lnformaWn on plants and animals and any cultural, Historical, or scenic aspects, kidicate the type of land use (residen5al, commercial, etc.),. intensity of land use tone -family, apadment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, se; -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and 'information required for this initial evaluation b the best of my abMty, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signature for K:IFORMSISUBMiTTAL\EW4NFO 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 3 May --02-00 08:51A b e county planning 538 7785 p.O2 ti USE PERMIT and MINOR USE PERMIT COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their application packet for a communications facility. Please include this checklist along with your submittal. Applicant Planner 1. Er� USA completed, signed, Uniform Application and Environmental Information form. if the application is signed by an agent for the property owner, an agent authorization form :must be submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. Too vlti�ch $3SvM`1(� 2. ElPayment of the current y required Application Fee andJor Deposit (any unused portion of the deposit will be returned upon final action, if any remains.) (Planner advises applicant) 3. a----�Thi -five 35 copies of plans which shall include a detailed site plan drawn t scale_ All �3' ( ) P P p o . plans shall be drawn of uniform size sheets no greater than 24" x 36". The finished Flans shall be folded to $'/2" x 11 ". The detailed site plan must include: a. 5�� Name and address of Applicant, Engineer and/or Person who prepared the plan. b. Property lines and lot dimensions. C. Assessor Parcel Number(s) and the street address. d. Proposed use and/or uses of the property. e. ❑ W/pr❑ Proposed landscaping plan, if applicable. f. Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvements on the property (including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, parking areas, wells, septic tanks and leach fields). RECED JUN, 0 8 2000 IF INSUFFICIENT FNFORMATION IS SUBLMI-MD,TH APPLICATION WII.LBE I May -02-00 08:51A b e county planning 538 7785 IP.03 g• ❑ �} ❑ Distances from any significant natural and constructed features of the property, such as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major tree stands, storm drains, bodies of water, railroads, to the property lines. h. Location of all slope banks, ponds, creeks, buttes, sloughs, rock outcroppings, natural drainage courses, irrigation canals and existing vegetation worthy of consideration for preservation, such as oak trees. i- ❑ J`A ❑ Any existing faults or fractures and geologic hazards. j• �� North arrow and scale of drawing. All plans shall be drawn to an engineering scale with the preferred scale of 1" = 20', with a north arrow preferably oriented to the top of sheet. k. 11W A-0 Building setbacks from the ultimate road right-of-way (front, rear, sides). 1. ❑ 4A'0 Proposed and existing on-site driveways and/or roads. m. E]""*' a Location, height, and materials of walls and fences (sections may be required). n. ❑ //� ❑ All driveways, drawn to scale, on adjacent and across the street properties within 1o0 feet of the subject site. o. ❑WJR'❑ Existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks and existing paving widths on-site or within 100 feet of the site, on adjacent and across the street properties. p. ❑ 00-0 Nearest cross streets on both sides with plus or minus distances from subject site. q. ❑ t'JFl"❑ Approximate location of all buildings within 1,000 feet, on adjacent properties. r. ❑WI)Of❑ Existing and nearest fire hydrants. S, ❑NJr, ❑ Access, both pedestrian and vehicular, showing service areas and points of ingress and egress. t. ❑I`�f �❑ Elevation contours, at a minimum per USGS maps. IF INSUFFICIF,NT INFOR,NIATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 2 May -02-00 08:52A b e county planning ep 538 7785 P.04 4. Q W/A" ❑ Conceptual Grading Plan Items to be shown include: a. ❑WIA❑ Natural areas to be preserved. b. ❑/J/� Proposed cut and fill areas in contrasting colors of zipatone pattern. C. ❑/A"� Existing and proposed contours within 100 feet of project boundaries. d. ❑ /AD Proposed drainage and flood control facilities. e. ❑l�/�"❑ Erosion control measures (e.g. - slope landscaping). f. El Natural drainage. g. OWN:] Elevations and finished contours. h. ❑ � f1tof 0 Location of retaining walls, drainage channels and existing stnictures. i, i rJ [ Location, elevation and size of proposed building pads. pible. All cans must be clear and le � g 5. u Gone copy of 8 %' x 11" transparency reduction of the detailed)site plan. 6. D -A vicinity map showing closest major cross streets, zoning and existing land use. The following additional items are required per Butte County Code Section 24462.1;. 7. Statement of Justification: a. includes a description of the proposed Facility, including the,type of facility being requested. IF INSUFFIC:IEN'r INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED. THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEENIFD INCOMPLETE. 3 May -02-00 08:52A b e county planning 538 7785 P.05 b. �T Height from natural grade to the top of proposed Facility. c. Support equipment proposed. d. E� RFR/EM)l: and wattage output data including the number of channels. e. �L✓J Horizontal and vertical location coordinates, 8. �EProposcd elevations of the structure and any accessory buildings, including building height and other physical dimensions, drawn to graphic scale. 9. Visual impact assessment, photo montages, mock-ups as determined by the Director of Development Services or Planning Commission. The assessment shall identify any proposed trimming of vegetation that will be required for the normal operation of the Facility. Stealth technology is encouraged. 10. ❑ W`P70 Klock -ups required (may be required at any time during the processing of the permit). 11, A discussion of and supporting information regarding the alternative site selection of at least a minimum of three to four other sites, if available, including coloration opportunities, and a statement as to why these alternative sites and/or coloration opportunities were rejected. 12. LLd A complete service area map showing the entire wireless communications network of the provider's twenty (20) Hailes in all directions from the proposed site for the time period from the filing of the application to twelve (12) months from the filing of the application, for the purpose of visually aiding cumulative environmental analysis, with and without the proposed Facility or Facilities, showing all hand-off sites within the above specified area. 13. ER LA graphic depiction of the search ring and all other technical criteria used in determining the proposed Facility location. 14,Ea Documentation which identifies failure characteristics of the Facility structure or tower and demonstrates that the site and setbacks are of adequate size to contain falling debris. 15. Written evidence demonstrating that the selected Facility structure or tower design is as visually unobtrusive as possible, given technical and engineering considerations, which indicate what type of Facility is required to provide reasonably effective service and also the best technology and/or construction available to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness. IF rNSUFFICIENT INFORMATION iS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 4 May -02-00 08:52A b e county planning 538 7785 P.06 The use of best available technology and/or construction to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness is mandatory. VLN +oF Co'O ca �-�ern16. ❑ ❑ Applis which operate comm n carrier facilities (specifically, but not limited to cellular, PCS. SMR and paging service licensees of the FCC) shall provide written evidence that the applicant has provided notice to all FCC licensed wireless communication service carriers operating within the County of Butte of the plans to develop the site. 17. ❑ D Evidence of a valid, current operating license or construction permit from the FCC or, if the applicant is not a wireless communications service provider, a user operating agreement for each and every such provider to which the applicant intends to rent space on the proposed Facility. A report, signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer licensed by the FCC, prepared pursuant to FCC OET 65, stating whether the maximum radio frequency radiationielectromagnetic radiation (RF/EMF) to be emitted by the proposed Facility, taking into account all other Facilities, both existing and known future Facilities, at the proposed site and adjacent properties, conforms to safety standards adopted by the FCC, if applicable. The reports prepared for Facilities shall conform to the reporting requirements set by the County and FCC OET 65 human exposure standards. The report shall also analyze the evidence provided in support of the proposed Facility location, height and radiated power, frequency, the number of channels, and all other related data and present alternatives for the location, height and radiated power, pursuant to the requirements of this section. If the proposed Facility exceeds FCC OET 65 human exposure standards, applicant shall also provide additional comprehensive technical and planning information regarding how the applicant shall protect all persons from such excessive exposure consistent with all Federal and State requirements, and any additional County requirements. 19. © hl/ 1 U Landscaping and painting plans, for the completed project. 20. ❑�' ❑ Projects in Agricultural Zones (A-5 through A-160) shall, prior to submitting an application for a proposed Facility, submit a site plan of the proposed Facility to the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner for comment and send a notification letter to all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County informing them of the proposed site location and tower height. No hearing on an application for a proposed facility in any agricultural cone will be scheduled, nor shall any Administrative Permit for any such facility be issued without proof that the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner and all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County have been notified, as specified herein. IF rNSUFFICIENT INFORMATION ISSU81tITTED,THF APPLICATION WILL BEDFEMED [NCO-10PLETE". 5 May -02-00 08:52A be county planning 538 7785 P.07 21. ❑ W✓A ❑ All applications for Facilities that are proposed to be located within the boundaries of any Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan or Airport Area of Influence, as adopted or designated from time to time by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission, sLaIl be submitted to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division, and a copy submitted to the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission for review regarding consistency with adopted Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plans and for recommendations addressing potential impacts to air navigation within the Airport Area of Influence. The County may in its sole discretion retain an independent consultant to review either individual elements of or the entire application and advise the County at the applicant's sole expense. Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. Signature: L==-- Applicant/Representative Signature. / Planner Receiving Application K FURMYSUBMITAL-CHECKLIS CELLUP WPO Date �"y9xoIf Date: / OD IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION ISSUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLFTE. 6 • �r A& ® O;t Ir CCD Q-0 C 0-g TO: COUNTY OF BUTTE 0 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION APPLICATION FOR ZONING/USE/BUILDING PERMIT David L. Stephens and Nell Stephens, as owners of the below -described property, do hereby appoint AirTouch Cellular as agent for the purpose of consummating any application necessary to ensure their ability to use and/or construct improvements to the property leased, or licensed, to them for the purpose of constructing a communications site. We/I understand that the application may be denied, modified or approved with conditions and that such conditions or modifications must be complied with prior to issuance of building permits. We hereby authorize employees of the County of Butte to enter upon the subject property during normal business hours as necessary to inspect the property for the purpose of processing this application. Located at: 3902 Esplanade, Chico, California 95973 Assessor's Parcel Number: 006-400-056 Signature of Property Owner: «SiteNumbem.«Site Nameu.LOA LESSOR: Title: OW 3 /— Date: RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DTVTSION 5/9/00 006010106000 J:\1 letters\letter templates\Labels 006400023000 A & S RANCHES INC planning\LABELS MUP 00-15.doc BETTENCOURT T & DARLEIN A 5018 WILSON LANDING ROAD 3544 BRIDLE LN CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95973 lliliiililililiiliiililllllilill IIiIiiiIiIiIiIiiI,iiLlILIsliII 00.6400025000 006400033000 006400034000 SUNSET HILLS GOLF COURSE INC LAFORCE JAMES W & DONA K JT EVANS BRENDA T FAMILY TRUST 13301 GARNER LN 1552 WINKLE DR 4275 OCEAN DR CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95926 7789 CHICO CA 95973 007420006000 007420007000 007420062000 PEACHER ROBERT R SCHROEDER THYRA K TRUST PLEASANT VALLEY BAPTIST 3107 HWY 99 18 ADAIR CT CHURCH OF CHICO CHICO CA 95973 DANVILLE CA 94526 355 PANAMA AVE CHICO CA 95973 006400020000 006400056000 006400021000 MACHHOUR YOUSEF STEPHENS DAVID L & NELL HAMRE LEE TRUSTEE 3990 ESPLANADE 3902 ESPLANADE CHICO CA 95973 3930 ESPLANADE CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95973 006400032000 006400039000 006400039000 HERMAN DIANNA K * BONAKDAR MOHAMMAD TRUST,ETAL BONAKDAR MOHAMMAD TRUSTEE 4310 OCEAN DR 19001 GLENMONT 3775 ESPLANADE CHICO CA 95926 IRVINE CA 92615 CHICO CA 95926 006400059000 MERICOM CORP/CO MCDONALD WAYLAND E TRUSTEE TOM DeLUCA DAVID & NELL STEPHENS 13407 GARNER LN 4700 NORTHGATE BLVD STE 160 4192 STONE VALLEY CT CHICO CA 95973 SACRAMENTO CA 95834 CHICO CA 95973 00 IS' 6 _ L,' O a — (5tp S L-1 C) o'2� a�A e igig 6 VANS (3 Zp � 14 11 I 4 1 AMM� PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST Project Planners fill out this in-house checklist upon receipt of a new project. Project Number: Project/Application Name: Project Site Zoning: General Plan Designation: APN: Project Planner: Date completed: Is the project located within any of the following areas? ❑ North Chico Specific Plan ❑ Oroville Enterprise Zone ❑ Williamson Act Land CLCA: ACRES: ❑ 100 Year Flood Plain ❑ Within`FEMA Floodway ❑ Within DWR Floodway ❑ Dam Inundation Area ❑ Watershed Protection Overlay Zone ❑ East Avenue Specific Plan ❑ Chico Area.Greenline (Project in area where Greenline policies apply) ❑ Greater Chico Area Redevelopment Area ❑ Nitrate Action Plan Area ❑ Archaeological Sensitive Area ❑ Hazardous Site ❑ Other Critical of Sensitive Area ❑ Planning Areas ❑ Urban Reserve ❑ Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area ❑ Paradise Urban Reserve ❑ Oroville Area Land Use Plan (Adopted 3/29/84) ❑ Oroville Urban Rese-ve ❑ Chico Area Land Use Plan (Adopted 3/18/90) ❑ Chico Urban Reserve ❑ Gridley -Biggs Land Use Plan (Adopted 8/586) ❑ Gridley Urban Reserve ❑ Honcut Area ❑ Cohasset Area ❑ Palermo Area ❑ Chapman/Mulberry Planning Area (in process of adoption 9-14-99) ❑ Deer Herd Areas ❑ Designated Development Zone ❑ Winter Range ❑ Critical Winter Range ❑ Summer Range ❑ Critical Summer Range ❑ Major Migration Corridor ❑ Intermediate Deer Range ❑ If Constrained; The Minimum Parcel Size Is acres. ❑ CLUP Area ❑ AIRPORT AREA OF INFLUENCE ❑ Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan ❑ Chico ❑ Paradise Skypark ❑ Paradise Skypark ❑ Ranchero ❑ Ranchero ❑ Oroville ❑ Oroville ❑ Airport Land Use Commission Review (ALUC) Required ❑ Urban Area (As defined in Improvement Standards for Chapter 20) ❑ City of Chico ❑ Durham ❑ City of Gridley ❑ City of Oroville ❑ Mountain Recreational Area ❑ Sphere of Influence ❑ City of Chico ❑ ❑ City of Oroville ❑ ❑ City of Paradise ❑ Watershed Areas Fire District ❑ Butte Creek ❑ ❑ Big Chico Creek ❑ ❑ Little Chico Creek ❑ ❑ Sacramento River Conservation (SB 1086) Other Essential Services ❑ Public Water District ❑ Public Sewer District City of Gridley City of Biggs Cherokee Wyman Ravine Study Area Rock Creek Study Area ❑ Well(s) ❑ On-site Sewer If well and/or on-site sewage disposal, has Environmental Health determined the application filing requirements? ❑ Pre -application review complete ❑ Pre -application review not required ❑ Drainage District/CSA ❑ Fire District ❑ Butte County ❑ El Medio Fire District ❑ Federal Aid Road(s) ❑ Other Permits required.from other agencies ❑ Department of Water Resources (DWR) ❑ Department of Fish and Game (DFG) ❑ CALTRANS ❑ Regional Water Quality Control Board ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Butte County Air Quality Control District ❑ Other Comments: Version: 9/28/99 CAMy DocumentsTROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST.doc Agency Special Review ❑ Office of Mine Reclamation ❑ Department of Fish and Game ❑ HCD (Mobile Home Parks) ❑ Other APPLICATION ACTIVITY LOG Action* Person Contacted** Phone Number** Time Spent/Cate *Use more than one line if necessary. **If applicable. APPLICATION ACTIVITY LOG I 1 I/klr �lGy s One GTE Place MC: GA313IREG Alpharetta, GA 30004 (678) 339-4259 October 24, 2000 Consumer Services Division California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: Notification Letter for North Esplanade of Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership (U- 3004 -C), Chico, CA MSA This is to provide the Commission with notice to the provisions of General Order No. 159. A of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California ("CPUC") that for the project described in Attachment A: [x] (a) The Company has obtained all requisite land use approvals for the project described in Attachment A. [ ] (b) No land use approval is required A copy of this notification letter is also being provided to the appropriate local government agency for its information. Should there be any questions regarding this project, or if you disagree with any of the information contained herein, please contact, please contact Kay Howe of Verizon Wireless at (678) 339-4259. Very truly yours, Kay O -Howe Administrator Network Compliance Attachment CPUC00.0550 ]RIECE173D OCT 3 U Z ) BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING 7MMSION Attachment A CPUC CELL SITE -REPORT FOR SACRAMENTO VALLEY LP 1. PROJECT LOCATION: - North Esplanade SITE NAME: North Esplanade SITE ADDRESS: 3902 Esplanade _ LOCATION: Chico, CA 95973 COUNTY: Butte APN: 006-400-056 COORDINATES: Latitude: 390 47' 27.0" N Longitude: 1210 53' 35.0" W 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Sacramento Valley LP proposes to install three (3) flush mounted antennas to an existing 100 - foot lattice tower and the installation of four equipment cabinets at the base of the tower. ANTENNA: Three (3) panel antennas (1' x 4') TOWER DESIGN: Self-support tower (lattice) TOWER APPEARANCE: Antennas will be flush mounted TOWER HEIGHT: 100' lattice tower BUILDING SIZE: Four equipment cabinets CPUC00.0550 Notification Letter GTE Mobilnet (U -3004-C) October 24, 2000 3. BUSINESS ADDRESSES OF ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES: cc: Planning Director Butte County 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 City Manager Butte County 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 County Clerk Butte County 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 Ms. Lori Badock Utilities Enforcement Branch Consumer Services Division California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 4. LAND USE APPROVALS: Minor Use Permit: • Issued: Effective: Agency: Permit Number: Resolution Number: CPUC00.0550 10-02-00 10-02-00 Planning Division Department of Developmental Services Butte County . 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 MUP00-15 N/A TO: X FROM: SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DETERMINATIO E.A91MAPWI Office of Plan.& Research Dept. 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 fO-- Butte County Clerk Butte County Planning 7 County Center Dr., Oroville 95965 Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: MUP00-15, Minor Use Permit AP Number: 006-400-056 Applicant: Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca, 4700 Northgate Blvd., Suite 160, Sacramento, CA 95834 State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to clearinghouse): Contact Person: Stephen Betts Telephone Number: 538-7601 Project Location: on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 1,000 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico. Project Description: Minor Use Permit to collocate three flush -mounted panel antennas at the 80 -foot level on an existing 100 -foot tall lattice tower. Four equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower. This is to advise that the Butte County Planning Commission has approved the above-described project on September 14, 2000, and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 2. 3. 4. The project will, _X_ will not, have a significant effect on the environment An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. _X_ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. Mitigation measures were, _X_ were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. A statement of overriding considerations was, _X_ was not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at: Date received for filing and posting at OPR Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 pnr�,..v,G_ Z<'/' 'L_ - Randy WilsoOf Principal Planner 1 � DECLARATION OF FEES D- alifornia Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca 4700 Northgate Blvd., Suite 160 Sacramento, CA 95834 FILING NO. Project Title/file number: Minor Use Permit, MUP00-15 CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION () A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee (X) B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED () A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filin&Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. () OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT / NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). 2. () NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning• fficial IS Randy Wilson Principal ,•n -•• Aeencv- Development D. Noy mber 22, iOOO TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FILING FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding (Fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4; Section 753.5c, Title 14, California Code of Regulations) Project Title / Butte County Location: MUP00-15, on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 1,000 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico. Project Description: Minor Use Permit to collocate three flush -mounted panel antennas at the 80 - foot level on an existing 100 -foot tall lattice tower. Four equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower. Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The County of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a Negative Declaration so as to evaluate the potential of this project for adverse environmental impact: 2. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence before the County that the project will have potential for an adverse impact on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. 3. The County of Butte has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5 (d), of Title 14, California Code of Regulations, if applicable. 4. The project is hereby found to be de minimis in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the State Fish and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. Certification: I hereby certify that the County of Butte has made the above findings of fact and that based upon the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. By:-9,1ze2o" Randy Wilson Principal Planner Lead Agency: -County of Butte Date: November 222000 • COUNTY OF BUTTE Oroville, California GENERAL CLAIM CLAIMANT: Mericom Corporation ADDRESS: 4700 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 160 CITY & STATE: Sacramento, CA 95834 DATE OF CLAIM: January 29, 2001 SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SFRVICFS IMPORTANT.• SEE INSTRUCTIONS rNWk�.ci-F DATE DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY)'AMOUNT 1-29-01 Refund of Unused Fees for File No. MUP 00-15 $55. 50 TOTAL $55. 50 I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and that this claim is true and correct as stated. Dated this ` day of f'vr/w' `-� 20 , at Calif. Signature of Claimant I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified abo ve been performed or delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriation [ ] or Specific Board Approval [ ] (Check one) for the 17"same. r Dated this � day of 20 -9-L, at 0 2- O V L L(e Calif. De artment Head or Authorized 2 ut De t. Code Ex . Code PAYABLE FROM FUND DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - AUDITOR'S'USE ONLY DEPT. & SUB. PROJ. SUB. OBJ. CLAIM NO. INV. NO. INV. DATE. ENCUMB. • CROSS ArAT. EDate 02/06/01 • Development Services DepaZ'tment Time 2:20 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet MUP 00-15 * Mericom Corporation 4700 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 160 Sacramento, CA 95834 In reference to MUP 00-15 Rounding None Full Precision No Last bill Last charge 10/13/00 Last payment / / Amount Date/Slip# Description 06/12/00 Larry P. / P 430687 Processing 06/12/00 Lynn R. / C #30727 Clerical 06/26/00 Tammie P. / C #30968 Clerical 07/24/00 Steve B. / P #31334 Processing 07/24/00 Lynn R. / C #31358 Clerical 07/24/00 Larry P. / P #31376 Processing 08/07/00 Steve B. / P #31604 Processing 08/18/00 Lynn R. / C #32310 Clerical 08/21/00 Lynn R.,/ C #31831 Clerical 09/04/00 Lynn R. / C #32078 Clerical 10/02/00 Roland P. / C #32539 Clerical Pagel HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TJTAL 1.25 73.75 59.00 2.00 90.00 45.00 2.50 85.00 34.00 5.75 339.25 59.00 0.50 22.50 45.00 0.25 14.75 59.00 3.25 191.75 59.00 0.75 33.75 45.00 2.25 101.25 45.00 0.50 22.50 45.00 1.00 34.00 34.00 Date 02/06/01 Time 2:20 pm MUP 00-15 * Wevelopment Services Depalkent Applicant Billing Worksheet :Mericom Corporation (continued) TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS TOTAL NEW CHARGES PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 05/31/00 Deposit - Receipt #18436 02/06/01 Refund/Claim Form to Auditor TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS NEW BALANCE 20.00 (1,064.00) 55.50 Page 2 $1,003.50 $0.00 $1,008.50 ($1,003.50) TOTAL NEW BALANCE $0.00 .iy,. .rte.+.'.... January 29, 2001 Mericom Corporation 4700 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 160 Sacramento, CA 95834- = .... u to LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND B=AUTY DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 959E5-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 www.buttecounty.net RE: Minor Use Permit, File No. MUP 00-15 Ladies & Gentlemen: The.total cost for the processing of the above -referenced application is $1,008.50. Please sign, date, and return the enclosed claim form to this office: Once we receive the claim form, we will then process your refund in the amount of $55.50. Deposit on,5-31-00, Receipt No. 18436 $1,064.00 Professional Planner $ 531.00 Mapping $ 88.50 Clerical $ 389.00 Total $1,008.50 Refund Due $. 55.50 Should you have any questions, please contact Brian Larsen at 538-7601 Monday through Friday, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services TAP:jb Enclosure NOTICE OF DETERMINATI16' TO: _ Office of Plan.& Research Dept. 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 X Butte County Clerk FROM: Butte County Planning 7 County Center Dr., Oroville 95965 [-DEC -kil 2= SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: MUP00-15, Minor Use Permit AP Number: 006-400-056 Applicant: Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca, 4700 Northgate Blvd., Suite 160, Sacramento, CA 95834 State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to clearinghouse): Contact Person: Stephen Betts Telephone Number: 538-7601 Project Location: on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 1,000 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico. Project Description: Minor Use Permit to collocate three flush -mounted panel antennas at the 80 -foot level on an existing 100 -foot tall lattice tower. Four equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower. This is to advise that the Butte County Planning Commission has approved the above-described project on September 14, 2000, and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1. The project will, _X_ will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. _X_ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were, _X_ were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations was, _X_ was not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at: Date received for filing and posting at OPR Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 00, Zl_-e� Randy WilsoOf Principal Planner DECLARATION OF FEES D� (California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4) NAME, AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca 4700 Northgate Blvd., Suite 160 Sacramento, CA 95834 FILING NO. Project Title/file number: Minor Use Permit, MUP0045 CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION () A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee (X) B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED O A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. () OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT / NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). 2. () NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: Randy Wilson Title: Principal Planner Lead Agency Butte County Department of Development Services Date: November 22, 2000 TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIF. OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FILING FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding (Fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4; Section 753.5c, Title 14, California Code of Regulations) Project Title / Butte County Location: MUP00-15, on the'east side of Esplanade, approximately 1,000 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico. Project. Description: Minor Use Permit to collocate three flush -mounted panel antennas at the 80 - foot level on an existing 100 -foot tall lattice tower. Four equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower. Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The County of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a Negative Declaration so as to evaluate the potential of this project for adverse environmental impact: 2. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence before the County that the project will have potential for an adverse impact on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. 3. The County of Butte has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5 (d), of Title 14, California Code of Regulations, if applicable. 4. The project is hereby found to be de minimis in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the State Fish and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. Certification: I hereby certify that the County of Butte has made the above findings of fact and that based upon the,initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. By: Randy Wilson Principal Planner Lead Agency: County of Butte Date: November 22, 2000 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT . 18957 ISSUED BY 6 DATE RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC LIAFCO: PLANNING P U B FIRE NOE/NOD' OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED �ROIVI NO. RECEIVE D WORKS SALES HEALTH F/G FEE OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT . 18957 ISSUED BY 0-1 MERICOM" C O R P O R A T 1 O N 4700 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 160 Sacramento, CA 95834 Date: November 15, 2000 •WiNKSM� �-� • �- •�u-• Phone: Fax: TRANSMITTAL Sent Via: U.S. Postal Service ® Blueprinter ❑ Express Delivery ❑ Other ❑ Courier ❑ From: 107114-Teil,'�orporation .-• Motchpll Phone: q1R-q9n-7g0n Mobile: 916-717-3153 Fax: 916-920-2343 ITEMS TRANSMITTED: One (1) check in the amount of $25.00 for Notice of Determination on'Honcut AIR037 in reference to the letter dated 6/19/00. REMARKS: ❑ Urgent ® For Your ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please Comment Review The above -information. is confidential information intended only for the viewing and use of MERICOM CORPORATION and their clients. Any unauthorized review, use,' communication,- dissemination, distribution or copying of "this -information is. stricJy prohibiied.:. - _ NOV 16 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA plate items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. mplete items 3, 4a, and 4b. ■Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this card to you. •Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not permit. ■Write'Retum Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number. •The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date delivered. 12 n.a;A- AAA --1 I An ArNrlc N MERICOM-CORP C/O TOM DE* L'UCA 4700 NORTHGATE BLVD STE 160 SACRAMENTO CA 95834 Received By: I also wish to receive the following services (for an extra fee): 1. ❑ Addressee's Address 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery Consult postmaster for fee. 332 );2- 4b. Service Type ❑ Registered Certified a I ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured ! ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD 7. Date of Delivery 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested ; and fee is paid) ; PS Form 3811, December 1994 v uomestic Heturn UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First -Class M Postage & Fe id USPS Permit No. G-10 • Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in this box • COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 7 County Center W" i 1 arovilK CA 9865-M _. _ iii sill li it ii lila I ii I} j October 16, 2000 CONSUMER SERVICES DIVISION California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 U 1 g U i Te I - A Sprint Affiliate 1 Bala Plaza East, Suite 402 Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 Phone (610) 660-9572 Fax (610) 660-9558 Re: UbiquiTel Site Number SF03UB322A (Port A Storage) This is to provide the Commission with notice pursuant to the provisions of General Order No. 159A of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California ("CPUC") that for. the project described in Attachment A: [check appropriate box] (a) ® The cellular company has obtained all requisite land use approval. (b) ❑ No land use approval is required because: A copy of this notification letter is also being provided to the appropriate local governmental agency for its information. Should there be any questions regarding this project, or if you disagree with any of the information contained herein, please contact Leonard Pirkel at (925) 570-7501. Very truly yours, 6:2� /�2- 1-9w Leonard R. Pirkle Attorney for Ubiquitel PCS Attachment cc: Lori Badock Utilities Enforcement Branch Consumer Services Division California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 cc: Thomas A. Parillo, Director Department of Development Services, Planning Division, Butte County 7 Country Center Drive Oroville, CA 95964 i *. —� Sp11t1 t jaAiquiTel - A Sprint Affiliate n IJ' 1 Bala Plaza East, Suite 402 Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 Phone (610) 660-9572 Fax (610) 660-9558 CPUC ATTACHMENT A 1. Project Location: Site ID Number (Name): SF03UB322A (Port Storage) Site Address: 35973 Esplanade Site Location: Chico, CA County: Butte County Assessor's Parcel Number: 006-400-056 Latitude: NAD 83 039-47-26.7 Longitude: NAD 83 121-53-39.3 2. Project Description: Number of Antennas to be installed: Six (6) five-foot tall panel antennas and one (1) GPS antenna Tower Design: Installation.on existing Nextel-SpectraSite tower Tower Appearance: Lattice tower Tower Height: 90 -foot tower with panel antennas centered at 60 -foot height Building Size(s): Three (3) equipment cabinets on a 9'x 18' concrete slab 3. Business addresses of all Governmental Agencies Thomas A. Parillo, Director County *of Butte Department of Development Services„ Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 4. Land Use Approval: On September 28, 2000, Ubiquitel PCS, a Sprint Affiliate obtained land use approval from the County of Butte for the construction of PCS CDMA Wireless Facility. The permit number is: MUP# 01-06. I 6 MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: Butte County Assessor's Office FROM: Butte County Planning Department SUBJECT: Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca, MUP00-15 DATE: September 29, 2000 Pursuant to Section 65863.5 of the Government Code, the following parcel identified as 006-400- 056, was: Rezone from to zoning district. Granted a variance to X_ Issued a conditional Minor Use Permit to collocate three flush -mounted panel antennas at the 80 -foot level on an existing 100 -foot tall lattice tower. Four equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower., on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 1,000 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico.,C-2 (General Commercial) K:\PLANNING\PROJECTS\UPM\MERICOM\PERMIT.WPD September 29, 2000 Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca 4700 Northgate Blvd., Suite 160 Sacramento, CA 95834 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 006-400-056 Dear Mr. DeLuca: L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES %7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 Enclosed is your validated Minor Use Permit No. MUP00 4 5 to allow Minor Use Permit to collocate three flush -mounted panel antennas at the 80 -foot level on an existing 100 -foot tall lattice tower. Four equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower.. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Ser y, Roland Parks OA IIIA o. 01, . MERICOM CORP C/O TOM DE LUCA 0 2 U a _ 4700 NORTHGATE BLVD STE 160+ Enc.& 0 H ! SACRAMENTO CA 95834 L=>> cc: Land Development Division (g) � _ a 0 0 0 LL Building Division (y) r- V z o� o f o 2 D q Environmental Health (p) m Z A �� - x c u. P� .�u-� ¢ E ¢ c a a 1 N i O (n w N �U E L E O J N E Department of Forestry (gr) o, o = tin _ , W_.: LL d fn a a ii r 40 ¢ ¢ O oa 566L 40MW `008E WJOJ Sd MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OCT 2 2000 DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) 006-400-056 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: Mericom Corporation is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with application filed: Minor Use Permit .to install three (3), four (4) square foot (1 -foot wide X 4 feet long) panel antennas on an existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower at the 80 -foot level, and to install four (4) 6.5 square foot equipment cabinets. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 12 months of the date of approval. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of approval, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. A Minor Use Permit subject to lapse may be renewed for an additional period of up to one year, provided that sixty (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date, an application for renewal of the Minor Use Permit is filed with the Planning Division on the prescribed form and accompanied by the necessary data and fees. 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services 9 . • to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a permit. Conditions of Approval: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height they will be located. 2. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County and any other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. 3. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. 6. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 7. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40;000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of'vertical clearance. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 9. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective ,date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 10. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of 2 the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in. all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 12. .All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 13. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 14. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 15. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to.the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 16. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 17. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 3 18. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit E" and date-stamped June 1, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 19. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 20. .. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. - 21. Building permits required for antennas and equipment cabinets. Engineer design calculations are required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings when additional antennas are installed. NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requireme of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before startingcorks 'o90r oei �giothertequirements. � c s�lt Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF 4 a INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES r PLANNING DIVISION To: File MUP 00-15 for Mericom (N. Esplanade Site), APN 006-400-056 From: Steve Betts, Senior Planner Subject: Bond for a radio frequency analysis Date: September 28, 2000 Check # 934469 for $2,500.00 from Verizon Wireless was received this date. The $2,500.00 is for a one-time radio-frequency analysis on Verizon Wireless' facilities located on the North Esplanade site. The funds received were placed in the EIR Trust Account, Account # 1.001. cc: Verizon Wireless a 9 29/00: l`3�141 , z saa� yam. r,i ..r, �Rww" v t'U`L 1001` W Ir+�l ss V eri�n IiJ:Rksc DATE RECEIPT NO. TOTAL RECEIVED PUBLIC WORKS LAFCO PLANNING PUBLIC ENV. SALES HEALTH FIRE NOE/NOD F/G FEE OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM . 0 11'93446911' 1:04330160 1: 0 4 5111 28 6 711' September 26, 2000 verIZOnwireless Verizon Wireless - 255 Parkshore Drive Folsom, CA 95630 Phone 916 357-1000 Mr. Steve Bettes Butte County Treasurer 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Radio -Frequency Analysis Bond North Esplanade Cell Site Dear Mr. Bettes: Per your email to Mr. Tom Deluca of September 21, 2000, please find enclosed our check in the sum of $2,500.00 for the above bond. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions; 916-357-2531. Sincerely, Zebby 4Lippolias Site Development Coordinator encs. SEP 2 8 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION VjJ VjEn BUTTE PLANNING D�SION September 18, 2000 Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca 4700 NorthgateBlvd., Suite 160 Sacramento, CA 95834 1 LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-a397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 006-400-056, MUP00-15 Dear Mr. DeLuca: . At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held September 14, 2000, your request for a Minor Use Permit, was approved subject to the conditions listed on the permit. Should you desire to appeal any of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, you must do so in writing, to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to 5:00 p.m., Monday, September 25, 2000. The appeal fee of $50.00 must be paid at that time. If you do not appeal and if there are no other appeal within the 10 calendar -day appeal period, the action of the Planning Commission is final. For purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, a Notice of Exemption must be filed. The fee for the filing of a Notice of Exemption is the $25.00 documentary handling fee. A check made payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $25.00 should be submitted to the Planning Division in order to complete the process. You will receive your valid permit, if there are no appeals, after it has been signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and we have received your recorded Certification of Ownership. Pursuant to Section 66020 (d) (2) of the Government Code you are hereby notified that you have 90 days to register a protest challenging any fees, dedications, reservations, or exactions imposed as conditions of approval for this project. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant /lr k:\f&ms\apprmup. frm 1 ■ M 3 E 0 i lid N d 3 s 0 H 0 3 d 0 0 E 0 0 I/ existing Nextel antennas v4 .x o - x �.j�.� ,,./ ;� :'�` I`•-''�' . �r,�.,�,rQ �; `¢iii AiRToucH- North Esplanade 3902 Esplanade Chico, CA v s` proposed Airtouch antennas vt Y I'v 1 0 RECEIVED JUN 0 8 1000 PLANNING DIVISION %fit.{ ♦.r ,Rd � � 4�1ca1 � �.+� t�� P R •. } i�, � A., � , {,; • y � � �f Pro Ylu •1 1•t yy� � � /atr 1 I Y4.�aBi h1 Joe1 %fit.{ ♦.r ,Rd � � 4�1ca1 � �.+� t�� P R •. } i�, � A., � , {,; • y � � �f Pro Ylu 0 RECEIVE] JUN 0 8 2000 PLANNING DMISTON ..i �- _r : ,�:-':: ::.,•. is ,�s:[;..r_ l LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY x=` PLANNING DIVISION • " "'`"`" DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-12397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 August 29, 2000 Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca 4700 Northgate Blvd., Suite 160 Sacramento, CA 95834 Re: Minor Variance, AP 006400-056, MUP00-15 Dear Mr. DeLuca: At the regular meeting of the Planning Manager on August 23, 2000, your request for Minor Use Permit to colocate three flush -mounted panel antennas at the 80 -foot level on an existing 100 -foot tall lattice tower. Four equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower. was recommended for approval. An approval recommendation by the Planning representative, has been forwarded to the Planning Commission as a consent item for final action on September 14, 2000, at 9:30 a.m., in the Board of Supervisors' Room; 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Consent items are set for approval in one motion. These items are considered non -controversial. No presentations will be made, however, some questions may be asked. The Chair will ask if any Commissioner or member of the public wishes to pull a consent item for discussion. The Minor Use Permit will be issued after approval by the Planning Commission. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Hackney at this office, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn chardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant Ir �iufie Count, LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 August 16, 2000 Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca 4700 Northgate Blvd., Suite 160 . Sacramento, CA 95834 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 006-400-056, MUP00-15 Dear Mr. DeLuca: Your request has been scheduled for hearing in front of the Planning representative on August 23, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held in the Planning Division Conference Room, at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. A recommendation by the Planning representative will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as a consent item for final action. Consent items are set for approval in one motion. These items are considered non- controversial. No presentations will be made,. however, some questions maybe asked. - The Chair will ask if any Commissioner or member of the public wishes to pull a consent item for discussion. The Minor Use Permit will be issued after approval by the Planning Commission. Should you have any questions. regarding this matter, please contact at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, `'yyfi'r' Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant Ir N E BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING MANAGER AGENDA REPORT - August 23, 2000 Applicant: Mericom Corporation of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico File #: MUP 00-15 A. Conditions of Approval B. Parcel Size: 4.8 acres Request: Minor Use Permit to install D. Initial Study three 4 square foot flush- Zone date: March 28, 1995 mounted panel antennas centered at the 80 -foot level on Project an existing 90 -foot tall lattice Planner: Stephen Betts tower and four 6.5 square foot equipment cabinets. Supervisor District: 3 G.P.: Commercial Zoning: C-2 (General Commercial) APN: 006-400-056 Location: On the east side of Esplanade, approximately 1,000 feet south STAFF COMMENT: Attachments: A. Conditions of Approval B. Vicinity Map C. General Plan/Zoning Map D. Initial Study E. Site Plan Staff recommends approval of the Minor Use Permit with conditions and findings. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: This project will allow for the installation.of three flush -mounted panel antennas centered at the 80 - foot level on an existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The new panel antennas will extend from 78.8 feet to 82.2 feet above ground level. Each panel antenna is 4 square feet (1 -foot wide x 4 feet long) in size. Four 6.5 square foot equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower. One cabinet will contain batteries for emergency backup power. The proposed panel antennas will provide digital wireless communications (cellular phone service) for the Highway 99 corridor north of Chico. The cellular phone service provider to operate the proposed antennas is AirTouch Cellular. The existing communication facility is unmanned, and does not require a water source or a sewage disposal system. One to two visits to the site will be made per month by company technicians to perform preventative maintenance. Access to the site is from Esplanade via an existing driveway and access road. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE I ■ The project site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Commercial. Surrounding parcels range. in size from 3.2 to 91 acres. Land uses on surrounding parcels include agricultural land on the west side of Esplanade, commercial and light industrial uses to the north and south, and Highway 99 to the east. The project site is 4.84 acres in size and is developed with a business that refurbishes and sells large modular storage units, a dwelling unit, the 90 -foot tall lattice tower, and a 200 square foot communication equipment shelter. The existing tower and equipment shelter are located in a 2,500 square foot lease area that is surrounded by a six-foot high chain link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire. A locked gate provides access into the lease area. The existing 90400t tall lattice tower was permitted with a Use Permit (UP 98-04) and supports three vertical antennas mounted at the top. The vertical antennas extend 99.5 feet above ground level. The existing tower is painted alternating red and white stripes, and a blinking red light is located on the top of the tower. ANALYSIS: General Plan and Zoning: The project site is designated as Commercial by the Land Use Element Map of the General Plan, which allows public uses as secondary uses (note: cellular phone service providers are considered a public utility). Section 24-146 of Butte County Code states that wireless communication facilities are not permitted in the C-2 zone unless a Minor Use Permit is obtained, subject to the requirements of Butte County Code Section 24-262. The Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance (Butte County Code Section 24-262) allows colocation on existing facilities in the C-2 zone with approval of a Minor Use Permit,. subject to numerous requirements. The project has been conditioned to meet the requirements of Section 24- 262, including: • Submittal of bonds to cover the costs of a one-time radio-frequency analysis. • Radio-frequency emissions in excess of FCC standards are not allowed. • Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered to be abandoned. • Verification submitted annually attesting that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The additional antennas mounted on the tower will not create an aesthetic impact. The antennas will not increase the height of the tower nor will the additional antennas extend beyond the, existing antennas. A photosimulation of the proposed antennas on the existing tower shows that the antennas will not be highly conspicuous. A condition of the project requires that the proposed antennas be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height where they will be installed. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 2 ■ The radio emissions from the proposed antennas are regulated by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). A radio-frequency analysis written by a registered radio-frequency engineer indicates that the radio emissions from the tower, including the existing and proposed antennas, will be well within FCC standards for cellular phone facilities for publicly accessible areas near the tower. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Manager take the following actions: 1. Recommend that the Planning Commission adopt a Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, that said.study did not identify any potential significant environmental effects, and that a Negative Declaration is proposed. B. Find that the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the public review process. C. Find, on the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study and any comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the Mericom Corporation Minor Use Permit project will not have a significant effect on the environment. D. Find that the proposed Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement and _ analysis of the County, which is the lead agency. E. Adopt the Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts, with no mitigation measures, as detailed in this agenda report, and. authorize the Chair to sign.' II. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a "de minimus" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR. 753.5. is not recommended. III. Recommend approval to the Planning Commission of Minor Use Permit 00=15 for Mericom Corporation, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit A and subject to the following findings: A. That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 3 0 Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building. Division, the Butte County Fire Department, and the Butte County Air Quality Management District. The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated. Commercial and is zoned C-2. The Commercial land use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. The C-2 zone allows colocation of communication facilities with approval of a Minor Use Permit. B. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas will not increase the height of the existing tower or extend beyond the existing antennas. 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property and no additional. services or utilities are required. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The project site is already developed with a 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The proposed antennas to be mounted on the existing tower will not have a harmful effect upon the neighborhood character. The radio-. frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very little vehicle traffic will be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment shelter. The communications facility is unmanned and only one to two site visits per month will be required after construction. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed: 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 4 ■ C. 0 The site is ideally suited for the project because the proposed antennas will- be mounted on the existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The project will not have an impact to any agricultural operations. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use will cause any other relevant impact. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be . operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Chapter 24, Section 262, of the Butte County Code. K:\PROJECTS\UPM\MERICOMWERICOM.RPT ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 5 ■ EXHIBIT A MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) MUP 00-15 PERMIT NO. 006-400-056 ` ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: Mericom Corporation is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with application filed: Minor Use Permit to install three (3), four (4) square foot (1 -foot wide X 4 feet long) panel antennas on an existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower at the 80 -foot level, and to install four (4) 6.5 square foot equipment cabinets. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte..County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 1 2. Unless otherwise provided forin a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 12 months of the date of approval. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of approval, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. A Minor Use Permit subject to lapse may be renewed for an additional period of up to one year, provided that sixty (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date, an application for -renewal of the Minor Use Permit is filed with the Planning Division on the prescribed form and accompanied by the necessary data and fees. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 6 ■ The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a permit. Conditions of Approval: Planniniz Division: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height they will be located. 2. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County and any other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. 3. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds. as required by the Uniform Building Code. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. 6. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 7. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 8. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 9. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 7 ■ 0 • 10. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so. long. as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC_OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant.to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual, use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring -no amortization period.. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 13. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 14. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 15. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 8 ■ reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 16. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 17. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 18. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit E" and date-stamped June 1,.2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 19.. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 20. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. Building Division: 21. Building permits required for antennas and equipment cabinets. Engineer design calculations are required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings when additional antennas are installed. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: Applicant . NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 9 0 m a ,k4 IIKSI �T� KOKO] ink4 m 2525 Dominic Drive, Suite J Chico, California 95928 (530) 891-2882 (530) 891-2878 Fax July 25, 2000 Stephen Betts, Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: MUP-00-15 Dear Mr. Betts: Lawrence D. Odle Air Pollution 'ontrol Officer W.Jar,es Wagoner Asst. Air Pollution �:ontrol Officer UJUA CEIVED JUL 2 7 2M'0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION The District has reviewed the request for comments for a use permit to collocate three flush - mounted panel antennas on an existing 100 foot tall lattice tower located at 3902 Esplanade in Chico. Based on the information submitted the .District recommends incorporating measures to control fugitive dust emission from all road and other construction activities during project improvements. Measures may include site and driveway watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed project. If you have any questions, please contact the District at 891-2882. Sincerely, w Gail Williams Air Quality Planner File No 3451.1 f:\apps\wpdocs\eir\b=up00I 5.doc July 27, 2000 To: Responsible and Trustee Agencies ,�utfe COuniU LAND OF NATURAL VVEALTH AND . BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3'97 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Re: NOTICE OF INTENT - To Adopt a Proposed Negative Declaration for a Minor Use Permit for Mericom Corporation, File # MUP 00-15 (North Esplanade Site), APN 006-400- 056 The Butte County Planning Division has completed an Initial Study, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), of potential environmental consequences anticipated in connection with,the above-mentioned project, a copy of which is enclosed. This letter serves as a Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration to allow responsible and trustee agencies a 20 -day review period in accordance with Sections 15072 and 15105 of the CEQA Guidelines. Please review the enclosed Initial Study and proposed Negative Declaration. This review should focus on your agency's area•of expertise and jurisdiction. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed environmental document, please contact this office between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner cc: Tom DeLuca (Mericom) Stu Edell, Butte County Land Development Division Ted Crawford, Butte County Fire Department/CDF Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 COUNTY OF BUTTE INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS I. BACKGROUND: Name of Proponent: Mericom Corporation (c/o Tom De Luca) 2. Address: 4700 Northgate Blvd., Suite 160, Sacramento, CA 95834 Phone: (916) 717- 3124 3. Name of Proposal: North Esplanade 4. Type of Pro ect: Minor Use Permit 5. Project Description: This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to install three flush - mounted panel antennas centered at the 80 -foot level on an existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The new panel antennas will extend from 78.8 feet to 82.2 feet above ground level. Each panel antenna is 4 square feet (1 -foot wide X 4 feet long) in size. Four 6.5 square foot equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower. One cabinet will contain batteries for emergency backup power. The proposed panel antennas will provide digital wireless communications (cellular phone service) for the Highway 99 corridor north of Chico. The existing communication facility is unmanned, and does not require a water source or a sewage disposal system. One to two visits to the site will be made per month by company technicians to perform preventative maintenance. Access to the site is from Esplanade. 6. Location of property: On the east side of Esplanade, approximately 1,000 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico. 7. Setting: The project site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Commercial. Surrounding parcels range in size from 3.2 to 91 acres. Land uses on surrounding parcels include agricultural land on the west side of Esplanade, commercial and light industrial uses to the north and south, and Highway 99 to the east. The project site is 4.84 acres in size and is developed with a business that refurbishes and sells large modular storage units, a dwelling unit, the 90 -foot tall lattice tower, and a 200 square foot communication equipment shelter. The existing tower and equipment shelter are located in a 2,500 square foot lease area that is surrounded by a six-foot high chain link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire. A locked gate provides access into the lease area. The existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower was permitted with a Use Permit (UP 98-04) and supports three vertical antennas mounted at the top. The vertical antennas extend 99.5 feet above ground level. The existing tower is painted alternating red and white stripes, and a blinking red light is located on the top of the tower. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 blinking red light is located on the top of the tower. Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 006-400-056 9. Date Checklist Submitted: July 6, 2000 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): Butte County Building Division. II. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑K I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, ❑ there will NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been ❑ adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I.find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, El NEGATIVE all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. ti 1-Z (0 0 0 Prepared by: Stephen Betts, Senior Planner Date 9:e/ 5= g,� -,; � I - lle4 4"O Reviewed by. andy Wilson, Principal Planner Date III. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 2 Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Hazards/Hazardous Materials ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Public Services ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Noise ❑ Population VHousing ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards, (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on a project -specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 3 • Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 Less Than Significant Potentially with Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. . 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached; and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce .the impact to less than significant. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 1t b) Substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? �t c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X ■ _ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 4 Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 Potentially Significant Impact d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Response: 0 Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact F"i a. - d. The three 4 square foot (1 -foot wide x 4 feet long) antennas will be flush mounted to the existing 90 -foot tall tower at the 80 -foot level, extending from 78.8 feet to 82.2 feet above ground level. The existing tower will not increase in height or width due to the proposed antennas. A photosimulation of the proposed antennas on the existing tower shows that the antennas will not be highly conspicuous. A condition of the project requires that the proposed antennas be painted to match the color of the existing lattice tower, which is red at the height the antennas will be mounted. This project will not affect a scenic vista nor will it have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. The project will not create any sources of new light or glare. Mitigation Measure: None required. 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert.Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? X b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? K 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 Potentially Significant Impact c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? _ r� Less Than Significant Less With Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact X a. - c. No. agricultural uses are established on the site and there is no California Land Conservation Act ("Williamson Act") contract affecting the property. The large parcel located to the west of the site, across Esplanade, is zoned A-20 and consists of row crops. The proposed antennas will not expand the height or width of the existing tower on the site, so there will not be any additional impacts to possible agricultural aerial spraying operations on the agricultural lands to the west of the site. The addition of the proposed antennas on the existing tower and the new equipment cabinets will not have an impact on agricultural uses. Mitigation Measure: None required. 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or -projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 0 X X X X • Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 Potentially Significant Impact e). Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? _ Response: �.J Less Than Significant Less with Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact x a. - c. Butte County, and all northern Sacramento Valley Air Districts, have been designated as "moderate" nonattainment areas for the state standards for ozone (03) and fine particulate matter (PM10). Currently, Butte County is in attainment for all the federal (less stringent) air quality standards. The only emissions that will be generated by the project will be from vehicles during installation activities and during occasional site visits for inspection and preventative maintenance. A very small amount of dust emissions will occur due to vehicle traffic on the gravel site access road. No other dust emissions are anticipated because no grading will be necessary and only a very small amount of soil disturbance for the construction of a 105 square foot (10 feet X 10.5 feet) concrete pad for the equipment cabinets will occur. d. No sensitive receptors, such as schools or hospitals, are located near the project site. e. The project will not create any odors. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 7 x Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? _ d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy ordinance. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Response: x x Y x a. - d. No riparian vegetation, wetlands, or vernal pools are located on the site. The project is not known to be inhabited or provide habitat for any rare, endangered animal or plant species (Butte County Master Environmental Assessment, Figure Bio -2). No vegetation will be removed as a result of this project because the lease area is already cleared and graded. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ E. Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact x c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? _ d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy ordinance. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Response: x x Y x a. - d. No riparian vegetation, wetlands, or vernal pools are located on the site. The project is not known to be inhabited or provide habitat for any rare, endangered animal or plant species (Butte County Master Environmental Assessment, Figure Bio -2). No vegetation will be removed as a result of this project because the lease area is already cleared and graded. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ E. Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact This project will not have an impact to fish and/or wildlife and the payment of fees under Public Resources Code Section 21089 and as defined by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 is not required. e. The proposal will not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy ordinance. f. The proposal will not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Mitigation Measure: None required. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? X b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? X c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Response: a. - d. According to Butte County constraints mapping, the project site is located in an area considered to have a low to medium archeological sensitivity. No impacts to cultural resources are expected because the proposed antennas will be mounted on an existing lattice tower and the area where the equipment cabinets will be located has already been graded. A very minor amount of soil evacuation will be required for installation of a 105 square foot concrete pad. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ (J • Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Mitigation Measure: None required. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1) Rupture of a known earth- quake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other sub- stantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 2) Strong seismic ground shaking? 3) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? 4) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? _ x ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 10 x X W 0 Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 Potentially Significant Impact d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating.sub- stantial risks to life or property? _ e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal or waste water? _ Response: • Less Than Significant . Less With Than Mitigation Significant Incorporated Impact No Impact X X a.1. The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. No known faults are located in the project area. The applicant submitted a letter from a registered civil engineer stating that the existing lattice tower should be able to handle the extra weight of the proposed panel antennas. No impact is expected to occur. a.2. The intensity of ground shaking at any specific site depends on the, characteristics of the earthquake, the distance from the earthquake, and on the local geologic soils and conditions: At present, there is insufficient data to predict accurately the expected ground motions at various locations in Butte County. a.3. The Butte County Seismic Safety Element's Liquefaction Potential Map indicates that the site has a low potential for liquefaction. No impact is anticipated. a.4. The Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that there is no potential for landslides in this area. No impact is anticipated. b. The Erosion Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that the project site does not have any potential for soil erosion. No soil erosion impacts are anticipated because no grading will occur and only a -very minimal amount of soil disturbance for the foundation of a 105 square foot concrete pad that four equipment cabinets will be placed on will occur as a result of this project. C. No impact is anticipated from instability, landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 11 • Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 0 Less Than Significant Potentially With Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact d. The Conservation Element's Expansive Soils Map indicates that the project site has a moderate expansive soil designation. No impact is anticipated. e. A waste disposal system is not required. No impact will occur. Mitigation Measure: None required. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools? _ d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 12 X X Fli X Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 Potentially Significant Impact people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Response: • Less Than Significant Less With Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact X K X V a. - d. The project will not create any hazardous materials, and is not located on or near any sources of hazardous materials. The radio emissions from the proposed antennas are regulated by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). A radio-frequency analysis written by a registered radio-frequency engineer indicates that the radio emissions frbm the lattice tower, including the existing and proposed antennas, will be well within FCC standards for cellular phone facilities. e. - g. The property is not located within the vicinity of an airport, airport land -use plan, private airstrip, or interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.. The proposed antennas will not increase the height of the lattice tower. No impact is anticipated. h. The project is not located within a State Response Area for wildland fires. The nearest fire station is Station # 41, located approximately 1.1 miles to the north of the property. The Butte County Fire Department/CDF does not object to this project and did not recommend any conditions. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 13 Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-I5.. •> • 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? X b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? 1t c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off-site? �t d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? 1t e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 1t f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? K ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 14 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? X b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? 1t c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off-site? �t d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? 1t e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 1t f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? K ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 14 • Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 Potentially Significant Impact g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Response: is Less Than Significant Less With Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact V X X V a. - f. This project will not have an impact to surface and ground water quality or quantity. g. - i. The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood zone as shown on Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map 06007C -0320C, dated June 8, 1998. j. The property is not located in an area prone to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact will be incurred with respect to these natural hazards. Mitigation Measure: None required. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project? a) Physically divide an established community? 1t b) Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 15 0 Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 Potentially Significant Impact agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? _ Response: • Less Than Significant Less With Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact a. The proposal will not physically divide an established community. X X b. The project site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and is designated by the Land Use Element Map of the Butte County General Plan as Commercial. Colocation of antennas is permitted in the C-2 zone with a Minor Use Permit. Public uses are allowed as a Secondary Use under the Commercial General Plan land use designation. Cellular phone service providers are considered a public utility. Surrounding parcels are zoned C-2 and A-20 (Agricultural, 20 -acre minimum parcel size) and have a General Plan land use designation of Commercial and Orchard and Field Crops. Surrounding and nearby parcels range in size from approximately 3.2 to 91 acres. Land uses on these parcels are row crops and commercial and light industrial businesses. A church is located across Highway 99 from the site. The project site is located within the City of Chico's Sphere of Influence. C. The property is not within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact will be incurred. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 16 Y 0 Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 Potentially Significant Impact b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? _ Response: Less Than Significant . Less With Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact X a. - b. The property is not known to contain any important mineral resources of value to the region. The project will not prevent the future extraction of any potential mineral resources located outside of the 2,500 sq. ft. lease area. No impact will be incurred. Mitigation Measure: None required. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or, noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels: c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? _ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? _ X e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 17 • Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 Potentially Significant Impact would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Response: • Less Than Significant Less With Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact �_4 X a. - d. Ambient noise on and around the project area is affected primarily by vehicle traffic on Highway 99 and Esplanade, and from the commercial and light industrial businesses in the area. These noises are intermittent and short-term in nature and will not expose people to significant levels of noise. Installation of the antennas and equipment cabinets will generate a small amount of noise, mostly in the form of vehicles arriving and departing the site. No large machines, which generate loud noises, will be required for this project. The proposed antennas and equipment cabinets will not generate any noise. e. - f. The project is not located in the vicinity of an airstrip or within an airport land use plan. No impact will be incurred. Mitigation Measure: None required. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project.• a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure? X b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 18 • Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Response: r! Less Than Fire protection? Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact x a. The project will not induce any population growth nor will it create a need for any new infrastructure which could induce population growth. b. - c. The project will not displace individuals or housing. No impact will be incurred. Mitigation Measure: None required. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services? b) Fire protection? c) Police Protection? d) Schools? e) Parks? f) Other public services? Response: a. The project will not create a need for any new public services.. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 19 x Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 • Less Than Significant Potentially With Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact b. The project will not create an increase in demand for fire protection services. C. The proposal will not cause an increase in demand for police protection services because the communications facility does not require such services. d. The proposal will not result in a demand for school facilities in the area. e. The proposal will not result in a demand to area parks and facilities. £ The project will not have an impact on any other public services. Mitigation Measure: None required. 14. RECREATION. a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?_ b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Response: X X a. - b. The project will not increase the use of existing parks or other recreational facilities nor will the project create the need for any new parks or recreational facilities. Mitigation Measure: None required. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. . Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 20 • Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 Potentially Significant Impact load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumula- tively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with accepted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Response: • Less Than. With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact Y x Y Y X M X a. - e. The project will generate additional vehicle trips on Esplanade during site development. The increase in vehicle trips during development will not be significant because very little construction will be required. The project will generate very few vehicle trips after construction because the communications facility will be unmanned and only an occasional vehicle trip will be required for inspection and preventative maintenance. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 21 • Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 • Less Than Significant Potentially with Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact f. There is adequate area on the parcel to handle the parking needs of vehicles during development activities and preventative maintenance visits. g. The project will not conflict with accepted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. Mitigation Measure: None required. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? )t b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 1t d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? 1t ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 22 Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 Potentially Significant Impact f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? _ g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Response: • Less Than Significant Less with Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact X X a. - e. The communications facility does not require a source of water or a sewage disposal system. The project will not have an impact on any water or wastewater treatment facilities. No additional storm water facilities will be necessary as a result of this proj ect. f. The project will not increase the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill because the project will not generate any solid wastes. g. No impact will be incurred to federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Mitigation: None required. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 23 • Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 Potentially Significant Impact b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively consider- able" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Response: C� Less Than Significant Less With Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact X X The project does not have the potential to cause impacts to the environment and no mitigation measures are recommended. V. MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: None. DATA SHEET A. Project Description 1. Type of Project: Minor Use Permit to install three 4 square foot panel antennas centered at the 80 -foot height on an existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower and four 6.25 square foot equipment cabinets. 2. Proposed Density of Development: N/A 3. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Minimal, approximately 105 square feet. 4. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): The parcel fronts on Esplanade. 5. Method of Sewage Disposal: None proposed or required. 6. Source of Water Supply: None proposed or required. 7. Proximity of Power Lines: Electrical power is already established on the project site. 8. Potential for further land divisions and development: The project parcel has the potential to be divided into numerous small parcels under the current C-2 zoning. B. Environmental Settiniz ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 24 • Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 • 1. Terrain a General Topographic Character: Level valley floor. b. Slopes: 0 - 1%. C. Elevation: 165 feet above sea level. d. Limiting Factors: None. 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics: Vina Loam, Shallow Phase - 2 to 3 feet thick, friable and granular, well supplied with organic matter, retains moisture well, drainage is good. 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. b. Erosion Potential: None. C. Landslide Potential: None. d. Fire Hazard: Unclassified - urban or irrigated area. e. Expansive Soil Potential: Moderate. 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water: None. b. Ground Water: Large valley aquifers. C. Drainage Characteristics: The parcel generally drains to the west. d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 20 to 22 inches per year. e. Limiting Factors: None. 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Poor - existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower and large cargo containers located on the site. 6. Acoustic Quality: Poor - noise from vehicles on Highway 99 and Esplanade heard throughout project site. 7. Air Quality: Good, except when stagnant air conditions persist in the valley. 8. Vegetation: None. 9. Wildlife Habitat: Birds and mammals common to valley areas 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: None known. Low to moderate archaeological sensitivity area. 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Commercial. 12. Existing Zoning: C-2. 13. Existing Land Use on-site: Modular storage unit refurbishing and sales business, 90 - foot tall lattice tower, dwelling unit. 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: Row crops, commercial businesses, light industrial businesses. b. Zoning: A-20, C-2. C. Gen. Plan Designation: Commercial, Orchard and Field. d. Parcel Sizes: 3.2 to 91 acres. 15. Character of Site and Area: Agricultural area and commercial/industrial uses. 16. Nearest Urban Area: Chico. 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: City of Chico. 18. Improvement Standards Urban Area: Chico. 19. Fire Protection Service: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 25 Project: Mericom Corporation, MUP 00-15 a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Station # 41, approximately 1.1 miles to the north. b. Water Availability: Fire hydrants. 20. Schools: Union School District(s): Chico Unified School District. ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1, Safety Element. Oroville, CA CH2M Hill, 1977. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV -1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Map. Oroville, CA. 11. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 11. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Federal Emergency J Management Agency. 1989. 13. USGS Quad Maps. 14. Soil Map, Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 15. Soil Survey of Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 16. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. G K:\PROJECTS\UPM\MERICOM\MERICOM.IS ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ al vrI LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3:•97 • j TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 July 27, 2000 Mericom Corporation Attn: Tom DeLuca 4700 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 160 Sacramento, CA 95834 Re: Minor Use Permit application for Mericom Corporation for colocation of three panel antennas on an existing 90 -foot tower and for four equipment cabinets, on APN 006-400-056 (North Esplanade Site), File # MUP 00-15 Dear Tom: Thank you for the submittal of the above referenced application received on June 8, 2000. Your project application, maps and related items have been reviewed by County Agencies in order to determine the completeness of your application. Enclosed please find copies of the comments we have received from County agencies regarding your project. These comments have been received as part of the initial thirty (30) day review of your project. Please review these comments and the conditions that are requested as part of the project's approval. Pursuant to the California Permit Streamlining Act, your project has been deemed "complete." Your project is scheduled for action by the Butte County Planning Manager on August 23, 2000. A notice regarding the date, time, and location of the Planning Manager's hearing has already been mailed to you.under separate cover. Should you have any further questions regarding these comments, please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner enc RECEIVED BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES JUL 2A 2000 \ PLANNING DIVISION dvi�di^� k�;v�5io►1 BUTTECOUNTY TO: BUILDING DIVISION FRONI: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca, MUP00-15 DATE: June 15, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor I Ise Permit to colocate three flush -mounted panel antennas at the 80 -foot level on an existing 100 -foot tall lattice tower, Four equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tow r on property zoned _ -2 (General Commercial) located on on the east side of Esplanade,approximately 1,000 feet south of Highway 99� at 3902 Esplanade, Chico_, identified as APN 006-400-056. Supervisorial District No. -2. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X _ PLANNING MANAGER ON September I , 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN. Ifno comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your -gtncy has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): \ Al/ BUTTE COY By: DT A1�T11S�ATh T Tl17�T � 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 536-538-7785 .0 W - MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Larry Painter FROM: Lynn SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR EXHIBITS AND PUBLIC NOTICE LIST DATE: July 24,. 2000 • - ►�- •I • 101912:341011 THIS IS A REQUEST FOR: Black & white reproducible exhibit map Planning Commission Development Review Planning Manager X Vicinity Map Planning Manager Color Exhibit Map Extension of Time Exhibit Map Color Planning Commission Exhibit Map Color Board of Supervisors Exhibit Map Public Notice List Special Exhibits Backread Ordinance Public Notice List: Special instructions: The above request is due no later than 7/31/00 Special Instructions and/or research: Number of Meeting Date Copies 8/23/00 .1 NOTE: Exhibits should be saved until project is through process, which includes appeal period. Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Manager that a public hearing will be. held on Wednesday, August 23, 2000, in the Butte County Development Services Conference Room, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following items: 9:00 a.m. - American Tower Corporation, c/o Dan Figueroa, Minor Use Permit for a 185 -foot high, three-legged, self-supporting lattice tower to provide digital wireless communications along the Highway 99 corridor north of Chico. Two cellular phone service providers (Pacific Bell and Ubiquitel) and possibly one additional provider will colocate on the tower. Panel antennas will be mounted on the top of the tower, at the 170 -foot height, at the 155 -foot height, and at the 125 -foot height. Small vertical antennas will be mounted at the 135 -foot height and at the 115 -foot height for paging services. The overall.height of the tower with the attached antennas will be 187 feet above ground level. Equipment shelters and cabinets will be installed on top of concrete pads within the lease area. The tower and equipment shelters/cabinets will be located within a 60 -foot x 100 -foot (6,000 square feet) lease area, which will be surrounded by a 6 -foot tall chain-link fence with three strands of barbed wire. The lease area is located approximately 291 feet west of Highway 99. Access to the lease area will be via a new gravel driveway from Hamilton Nord.Cana Highway. The proposed communication facility will be unmanned, and does not require a water source or a sewage disposal system. The property is zoned A-40 (Agricultural'- 40 acre parcels) and is located on the east side of Hamilton Nord Cana Highway, approximately .8 miles north of Cana Highway, north of Chico. APN 047-100-143 (SB) (MUP 00-10) 9:00 a.m. - Mericom Corporation, c/oTom De Luca, Minor Use Permit to install three flush - mounted panel antennas centered at the 80 -foot level on an existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower and four equipment cabinets at the base of the tower on property zoned C-2 (General Commercial). The property is located on the east side of the Esplanade, approximately 1,000 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico. APN 006- 400-056 (SB) (MUP 00-15) The above mentioned applications, Initial Studies, and maps are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Development Services Department, Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. For information call: (530) 538-7601 (Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) Comments may be submitted in writing at any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. Upon action taken by the Planning Commission on the project an appeal may be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. The appeal period is 10 days. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION THOMAS A. PARILO, DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Thursday, July 27, 2000. TO: FROM: RE: DATE: N: T RECEIVED BUTTE COUNTY JUL 13 2000 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION BUTTE COUNTY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY PLANNINGDTVISTOh Butte County Planning Division Request for Comments on a Development Application: Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca, MUP00-15 July 10, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and .submil conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted -within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601- Thank 38-7601_Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to colocate three flush -mounted panel antennas at the 80 -foot level on an existing_1 00 -foo tall lattice tower. Four equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower, on property zoned C-2 (General Commercials located on the east side of Esplanade, aproximat y 1,000 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, anade, hi o , identified as APN 0-0- 409-056. Supervisorial District No. 3. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER- ON November 2, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN July 26, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): �l A_ J 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR MINOR USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca AGENT:N/A FILE #: MUP00=15 . Ll DATE: July 10, 2000 APN: 006-400-056 PLANNER:Stephen Betts PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Minor Use Permit to colocate three flush -mounted panel antennas at the 80 -foot level on an existing 100 -foot tall lattice tower. Four equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUTTE COUNTY FIRE. DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS H. FIRE PROTECTION 1. Construction, installation or development of structures or facilities on the parcels/lots shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, (Public Resources Code 4290), and all other applicable State and County codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of application for improvement permits. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and maintained continuously thereafter. 3. Fire hydrant identification, reflector or post reflectors shall be installed acceptable to the County Fire Warden. 4. In lieu of a pressurized water system or water storage tank, payment of $200.00 per created parcel into the Battalion _ water tend fund, is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. A pressurized community water system for fire protection is required. The specific locations and fire flow requirements shall be in accordance with the Fire Department specifications and to the satisfaction of the County Fire Warden. Average required hydrant spacing _ feet, hydrant size _ inches, and residual fire flow gpm. Submit plans to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction of facilities. 6. In lieu of hydrant installation, payment may be made into the hydrant fund at a cost of $1.72 per lineal foot of street frontage. The estimated fee amount is $ 7. Prior to recordation of the Map or application for a building permit, the applicant shall pay the then current fee for the West Chico Fire Station Fund. A8. Provide an all weather access of at least 10 foot wide and with a vertical clearance of 15 feet that will accommodate a 40,000 pound fire apparatus to all structures. BUTTE COUNTY ; LAPCo DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION J u L 13 2000 TO: LAFCo Oroville, Cali#omia FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca, MUP00-15 DATE: July 10, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a tall lattice tower. Four equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower, on property zoned C-2(General Commercial) located on the east side of Esplanade, aproximat y 1,000 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 E,, lgl lanade, Chico , identified as APN 400--056. Supervisorial District No. 3. l� LPA /D S THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER- ON November Q, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN July 26, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUq 1Q PLANNING DIVISION p�Ce�lerOQQ TO: Butte County Environmental Health FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Mericom Corporation; %Tom DeLuca,.MUP00- 15 DATE: June 14, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor i Jse Permit olam•w7a•IMW&UWOU1UU1!I•Url•1101.11•li7.J1111110_•I•IOIrI!1!IPIIIMIIawo•)IK%I-fL%III•IDIIL9r:IR-14 W1 a0Wl•rs.6YWU■1IP1Cw, — • • • • ' • - • 1 - • 11 11 " • - • • 1 1 - • - • • I . • - • • • . 11 . - 111 •. I •E • ••., •• •1_ • .•el • • • • ' 11• X11 1 • • • • THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING MANAGER on September 13, 2000 . COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN June 28, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 Environmental Health J U N 15 2000 Chico, California BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DMSION TO: Butte County Public Works FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca, MUP00- r 15 DATE: June 14, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: SlThen The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor Use Permit to colocate three flush -mounted panel antennas at the 80 -foot level on an existing 100 foot tall lattice tower. Four equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower on property zoned C- (General Commercial) located at on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 1.000 feet south of Highway 99 at 3902 F-planade, Chico., identified as APN 006-400-056. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) X PLANNING MANAGER on September 13, 2000 COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN June 28, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. (Attach additional pages if necessary): 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538- J U N 1 4 2000 COUNTY OF BUTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT DIV. TED JUN 2 9 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION . Aj DATE: June 15, 2000 County Offices and Cities: _ Chief Administrative Officer _X/ Environmental Health / Sheriff LAFCo Biggs Oroville Irrigation District: Butte Water _ OWID _ Table Mountain Irrigation Domestic Water _ Butte Water District OWID Sewer Develop. Services Director Assessor BCAG Air Quality Mgmt. Gridley Paradise Animal Control Biggs/W. Gridley Water Paradise Irrigation Thermalito Irrigation a California Water Service Co. _ Thermalito Irrigation District Durham Imgation Richvale Irrigation Other Del Oro Water Co. Other Butte Water District _ Themalito Irrigation _ X"'/ Public Works Director Building Manager L.O.A. PUD ALUC —,� Butte Co. Farm Bureau tJ� Chico EI Medio Fire Protection District Chico Airport Commission California Water Service Co. _ Thermalito Irrigation District Durham Imgation Richvale Irrigation Other Del Oro Water Co. Other Butte Water District _ Themalito Irrigation _ Sterling City Sewer Main Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) _ L.O.A. PUD Fire Protection California Department Forestry EI Medio Fire Protection District of _ Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Durham Area Recreation _ Feather River Rec. & Park Paradise Recreation & Park Richvale Recreation & Parks Utilities _ PG&E North - Chico _ Chambers Cable TV Pacific Bell PG&E South - Oroville _ Viacom Cable TV State Agencies CalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept. of Water Resources _ Dept. of Fish and Game Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter) Dept of Parks and Rec. _ Highway Patrol _ Central Reg. Water Quality Cont _ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program Department of Conservation _ Off. of Mining Reclamation _ Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations _ Dept.Social Services, Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management _ US Fish & Wildlife Service Army Corps of Engineers Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. _ Lime Saddle Dist _ Community Association _ Mosq. Abatement. Oroville/Butte Co Drainage _ Butte Env.l Council _ Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society _ Butte Co. Mining Committee _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancy School Districts BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Environmental Health FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Mericom Corporation, % Tom DeLuca, MUP00-15 DATE: June 15, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor Use Permit to colocate three flush -mounted panel antennas at the 80 -foot level on an existing 100 -foot tall lattice tower. Four equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower on property zoned_ C-2 (General Commercial) located on on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 1,000 feet south of Highway M9 at 3902 Esplanade, Chico-, identified as APN 006-400-056. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X _ PLANNING MANAGER ON September 13, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN June 29, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: AP# O o co - 4 0 o- O S (o APPLICANT: OWNER: REPRESENTATIVE: SIZE: 4. 8y Acres l2. Soo 5o. �-h 'le4s� Qrc4) LOCATION: or -%ham o -F EsplQradc-, approYivv.ale(Y 1, 000 �«� ss.sO^ ^� 4,tebL.AaY 44 a* 3902 E�.�lav,cdp. cl�� co SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT # �-EXISTING ZONING: G- Z - ZONING HISTORY: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: G ov�nt c'�i APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: RECEIVED ,JUN 0 8 2000 MERICOMTM C O R P D R A T 1 O N BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING EIMSION STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION AIRTOUCH, NORTH ESPLANADE SITE 3902 Esplanade, County of Butte, APN: 006-400-056 The wireless communications ordinance, Section 24-262, states that the purpose and intent of the ordinance is to encourage co -location . This application complies with the purpose and intent of the ordinance because it is co -location on an existing monopole. In addition, the height of the existing monopole will not be increased. The site is an approved 50' X 50' leased area with a 100' monopole and a 10' X 20' equipment shelter. The proposal includes mounting three flush -mounted antennas at the 80' level and pouring a 10' X 10.5' pad for ground equipment. The existing leased premises are sufficient for the proposed improvements. The existing site has been approved by the Butte County Planning Commission, UP 98-04. This site is a digital project and is intended to fill a "gap" in coverage. One of the main advantages with digital technology is that it provides improved sound quality, due in part to its ability to remove interference and static. Digital batteries also last longer than analog batteries. A major benefit of the AirTouch digital service is that it works in combination with traditional analog technology to assure that users maintain connectivity between the two technologies. Radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) is regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). An RF report prepared for this application demonstrates that the maximum radio frequency radiation associated with this project falls well within the standards outlined by the FCC. The visual or aesthetic impact should be extremely minimal. The existing site is a 100' lattice tower. Mounting three flush -mounted antennas at the 80' level, and painting them to match the existing tower, will result in a negligible impact. NORTHWESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 4700 NORTHGATE BLVD., SUITE 160 20472 CRESCENT BAY DR., SUITE 104 SACRAMENTO, CA 95834, U.S.A. LAKE FOREST, CA 92630 U.S.A. TELEPHONE: (9 16) 920-7900 / FAX: (916) 920-2343 TELEPHONE: (949) 470-7990 / FAX: (949) 470-7939 In conclusion, this project should be approved for the following reasons: • It complies with the purpose and intent of the new ordinance because it attempts to address coverage issues through a co-location rather than a new monopole. • The height and envelope of the existing tower will not be increased. • The antennas will be painted to match the existing tower, resulting in a negligible visual impact. • The RF levels of radiation fall well within the standards prescribed by the FCC, the agency that has been designated by the federal government to regulate this issue. • The project will improve wireless communication within the subject, area, resulting in better communication between businesses and.families. In addition, the ability to report emergencies will be increased. I/ existing Nextel antennas ltd r s '. �, ;,► :' North Esplana 3902 Esplanade Rri { A l R 1T V H- Chico, CA IY � proposed Airtouch antennas ®m � •', I�s .. t. to s �, � 1 E RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2000 PLANNING DIIVISION -� existing Nextel antennas k y �^ North Esplanade is a ,. 3902 Esplanade 1 A I R T 0 U C H" Chico, CA proposed Airtouch antennas t61z A7 `a Ll RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION + -/ existing Nextel antennas k l North Esplanade 3902 Esplanade AIRT0UCHi Chico, an "CA proposed Airtouch antennas •e ti ".4 • �t '�iC� t, y �•" w .ilk v4 14 AMS .! •h 1, VIP VJ,' .c .: 0 RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2000 PLANNING COUNTY -/ existing Nextel antennas 1 proposed Airtouch antennas t" k d c -�.} icy •tU ... w� '2' e^ � 1i+T��., �J " �' �}j� . �� �y({ 1'r,�. ^Ft" j,.y _ p.,!- t J J , I W � 4 _ law . �an,��;�, a. f �,�, ��►� :, d 1tK'd M.,i' t:t. North Esplanade ` t;�=� •is,;l�'rY' A� 3902 Esplanade ;,-C, AIRT DUCH- Chico, CA proposed Airtouch antennas t" k d c -�.} icy •tU ... w� '2' e^ � 1i+T��., �J " �' �}j� . �� �y({ 1'r,�. ^Ft" j,.y _ p.,!- t RECEIVED JUN- 0 0 2000 PLANNINGDoIDIgION -/ existing Nextel antennas h v . t.. �'. • N,�.w , TTS' � .ry �,Yi .. P. 1 . North Esplanade 3902 Esplanade A I R T o U C H" Chico, CA \ llt� proposed Airtouch antennas 5 • • RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION ,.. y.�•�' � .��;� �- ,.:�.+irk- North Esplans 3902 Esplanade ±1 ja_, Proposed r I .`T'd �� F' '�11.H'�• 4., 7.;� R :�vY <.:'f {�. -- ,y; Y - - � lf�� E ���.�.'fCr `�'ai x.," ; 4�.w� 3t,, ( � ,.it if�y.}�LTr' �4 '.hi'fJ•Y,� �.:.1 �� J////J iYv f •`Jlt AM i ; .4 �I f I• , f SI. 1 t � i � 1 1. rW ,.. y.�•�' � .��;� �- ,.:�.+irk- North Esplans 3902 Esplanade ±1 ja_, Proposed 9 RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION Photosimulation of view looking north from near the base of the existing tower. ©Copyright 2000 - Previsualists Inc., all rights reserved. Accuracy of photosimulation based upon information provided by project applicant. Questions? Call 1-888-FOTOSIM. • RECEIVED JUN. 0 8 2000 PLANNING COUNTY Photosimulation of view looking north from near the base of the existing tower. OCopyright 2000 - Previsualists Inc., all rights reserved. Accuracy of photosimulation based upon information provided by project applicant. Questions? Call 1-888-FOTOSIM. C� RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION r . 1.. D• ' " � �p �•1 ., {�, �„n as'��, toNorth Esplan; �- 3902 Esplanade Chico, CA RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2000 PLANNING DIMS ON Photosimulation of view looking north from near the base of the existing tower. CCCopyright 2000 - Previsualists Inc., all rights reserved. Accuracy of photosimulation based upon information provided by project applicant. Questions? Call 1-888-FOTOSIM. • • RECEIVED JUN, 0 8 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION *0 •0 INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION To: File MUP 00-?? for Mericom Corp. (N. Esplanade Colocation Site) From: Steve Betts Subject: Application Fee/Application Incomplete Date: May 31, 2000 Mericom Development LLC check # 7200 for $1,064.00 was deposited this date for a Minor Use Permit application. The Minor Use Permit application fee is $350.00. The additional funds received ($714.00) may cover the additional funds required for processing of cell tower applications, which have all been well above the $350.00 application fee. The applicant agreed with this (see e-mail from Tom De Luca dated May 26, 2000). As of this date the application has not been accepted for processing because the application is incomplete. The applicant has been notified of this situation and will be submitting the necessary materials to make the application complete. Jt Esplanade �• •• Page 1 of Betts, Steve From: Tom Deluca [tdeluca@mericom.com] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 8:24 AM To: 'Betts, Steve' Subject: RE: N. Esplanade thanks for response... Item 1: Go with option 2. Item 2: The photo sims are correct, the elevations are wrong, I will submit revised elevations. Item 3: 1 will show revised map with the Skyway site. Item 4: 1 don't think this is pertinent to co -locations. Item 5: Thanks, we, have submitted this previously. I will try and have the supplemental material to you by the end of next week. Thanks, Tom -----Original Message ----- From: Betts, Steve [mailto:SBetts@ButteCounty.net] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 3:40 PM To: 'tdeluca@mericom.com' Subject: N. Esplanade Tom, I reviewed the materials you submitted for N. Esplanade colocation site and have a few comments 1. The application fee for a Minor Use Permit is $350.00. You dropped off a check for $1,064.00, which is the application fee for a Use Permit. There are two ways to handle this: 1. We return the check to you and you submit a new check for $350.00, or; 2. We deposit the current check and will refund you what we don't use. Due to the extra staff time required for cell tower projects, the processing fees will be well in excess of $350.00 and we will ask you for more money if you do send us a check for $350.00. 2. The tower elevation shows that your proposed antennas will not be flush mounted, while the photosimulations do. I am assuming, based upon the photosimulation, what you told me, and the project description, that the antennas will be flush mounted. If this is the case, then we need revised tower elevations showing the correct configuration of the antennas. If I am interpreting the elevation wrong, please let me know. 3. Item 12 on the application checklist requires a complete service area map, showing existing and future service areas, for AirTouch's service area. You did supply maps showing current coverage and the coverage of the proposed antennas. However, the map is incomplete because it does not show the Skyway site, which is within 20 miles of the N. Esplanade site. Please resubmit revised service area maps showing the coverage provided by the Skyway site. 4. Item 16 on the application checklist requires applicants to provide written evidence that they have noticed all other wireless communications service carriers operating in Butte County of the applicant's 5/30/00 -N.'Isplanade �• •• Page 2 of 2 intent to develop the site. I am not sure that this should apply to a colocation, and I will check with Randy Wilson on the applicability of this requirement. 5. Item 17 on the application checklist requires applicants to submit a current operating license. You did not submit this, but I believe the other AirTouch applications contained a copy of it. I will make a copy and include it in this project. Okay, that is it (at least for now). Please submit the required items as soon as possible because the application is not complete and we cannot process the application until such time as it is complete. 19It1IT, Steve 5/30/00 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 3:40 PM To: 'tdeluca@mericom.com' Subject: N. Esplanade Tom, I reviewed the materials you submitted for N. Esplanade colocation site and have a few comments: 1. The application fee for a Minor Use Permit is $350.00. You dropped off a check for $1,064.00, which is the application fee for a Use Permit. There are two ways to handle this: 1. We return the check to you and you submit a anew check for $350.00, or; 2. We deposit the current check and will refund you what we don't use. Due to the extra staff t me required for cell tower projects, the processing fees will be well in excess of $350.00 and we will ask you for more money if you do send us a check for $350.00. 2. The tower elevation shows that your proposed antennas will not be flush mounted, while the photosimulations do. I am assuming, based upon the photosimulation, what you told me, and the project description, that the antennas will be flush mounted. If this is the case, then we need revised tower elevations showing the correct configuration of the antennas. If I am interpreting the elevation wrong, please let me know. 3. Item 12 on the application checklist requires a complete service area map, showing existing and future service areas, for AirTouch's service area. You did supply maps showing current coverage and the coverage of the proposed antennas. However, the map is incomplete because it does not show the Skyway site, which is within 20 miles of the N. Esplanade site. Please resubmit revised service area maps showing the coverage provided by the Skyway site. 4. Item 16 on the application checklist requires applicants to provide written evidence that they have noticed all cther wireless communications service carriers operating in Butte County of the applicant's intent to develop the site. I am not sure that this should apply to a colocation, and I will check with Randy Wilson on the applicability of this requirement. 5. Item 17 on the application checklist requires applicants to submit a current operating license. You did not submit this, but I believe the other AirTouch applications contained a copy of it. I will make a copy and include it in this project. Okay, that is it (at least for now). Please submit the required items as soon as possible because the application is not complete and we cannot process the application until such time as it is complete. Thanks Steve iVT0 r7 jl.,-.� V117 "t W ENV.-- N8E/NOD RECEIPT PUBLICTOTAPUBLICPUBLIC LAFCO PLANNING FIRE OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FP16K� NO. RECEIVED WORKS SALES HEALTH F/G FEE OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT . 18436 ISSUED BY 68 . lap I -J a y MERICOM DEVELOPMENT, LLC Butte County Recorder 5/3/2000 05/02/2000 Bill # Pacific Liberty 7200 1,064.00 1,064.00 }5- i "C' ' '•. E U f¢ T E NoeD i � J v RECEIVED JUN 0 0 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION cei.Vrn ct ... t con��aoaq = G� 1 rsII i✓l�.-� GGd4l RG �—•-�—� o f sT p� eels o o ' Pa Rd W" . ig Ra.,4 � �.lr ` flr �Wlu AOWR E781 2 0 0. / " 1 Y 1 D, i "C' ' '•. E U f¢ T E NoeD i � J v RECEIVED JUN 0 0 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION ■ ■ - ■ � � � ani I ul YmnyotryM 4 � c C � P I 'P!! yaalp '1:1H uj � Q� ! ma Cams I � a enllelaGslA I r 555 BP!tl l vy le„ IenPVI o p Mgta win�rnl'9w en oa ° CI iPeaAMS '-al _J OVOa 1~3S :5 I (IVO!! 13SSVHOD - !E S _ � I � ;Iaa,Ig ssaluoj o OVOF1 _ Ivecvupn 4e6 Joe` to 0 c, ! \'� ¢taJa¢t tea`; °J \t¢¢°� • ` \ JPs04a� t Oi ul Auuyot' \ `Pd caap¢t a I U00 I 'uj OAulaA e. f V Q O � W ) d _ I Gym o i or d � ( •' G v •lD aIDPB a4 � G "31H 'aue'I sHaIH I auel syolHa I _ � � ° b I a 3 'I' SAP 1i ?f ° MAI■i � m i yw, I m '{h�, t° r �o ' .'`' J' Pa¢•oJ J-o?--'°P¢s rad aOak Pst` .�' Y6 U 'Oyao PEi E wWWis j � W o = i y H Or b •n q of y` �4:s v n, �t 0 C U aoun lace V� ! i $ .E E m r V � $ o' I cmc$ \ y I �$ I r—'+ co ��- c \ 81—V laIwH S HZ m i; PTI tleIPNaW Peow pjaN 01 ue!pl,ay,1 I" M ■ et ■ � P.O. BOX 828 WOODLAND, CA 95776 TELEPHONE: (530)662-1755 FACSIMILE: (530)662-4602 • • LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE CIVIL ENGINEERS May 12, 2000 Mr. Jerry Jazmadarian Project Manager Mericom Corporation 4700 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 160 Sacramento, California 95834 Re: North Esplanade, AIRToucH Co -location Dear Jerry: 608 COURT STREET' WOODLAND, CA 95695 E-MAIL: Imce@ncal.net- I have ,revviewed the original plans for Nextel's Sycamore Creek, CA -0713B, tower site. The tower det�l shows the existing Nextel antennas on the top of the tower and four (4) future microwave dishes. TLe microwave dishes have not been installed at this point. The tower loadings, due to the proposed AIRTOUCH antennas, would be similar to the microwave dishes. It is reasonable to assume the tower design would 1=e sufficient for the new AiRTouCH antennas. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE PROF ESS/ oN Bryan P. Bonino, P.E., L.S. w No. 41804 m Exp. 3-31-04 sT CIVIL �P OF CAC\F X:U.and Projecu\2485 Mericom\Word Processing\2485-9_L01.wpd jUN 0 a 2001; BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION a / ERP - sector 213 Sector Ct. ' 3 ERP - total 839 Watts Ht. 80 ft. P PD= 4•� •r? Base of Tower x distance (ft.) 0 x distance (cm) 0 y distance (cm) 2438.4 Pt to Pt distance (cm) 2438.4 Power Density (UW/CM2) 11.22902885 % of Standard 1.9804% Sheetl NORTH ESPLANADE 100 ft. from 1000 ft. from 1 mile from base base of tower base of tower of tower 100 1000 5280 3048 30480 160934.4 2438.4 2438.4 2438.4 3903.344535 30577.38044 160952.8717 4.382060037 0.071408768 0.002577239 0.7729% 0.0126% 0.0005% The ANSI standard for cellular is 567 m ic roWatts/centi meter squared NOTE: This is a CDMA digital site. CDMA stands for code division multiple access. This is a "spread spectrum" technology, which means that individual calls or telephone conversations are not assigned to a dedicated channel with a fixed power output, as in an analog system. Instead, each call is digitally encrypted and distributed throughout the available bandwidth in the CDMA "carrier", which is 1.25 MHz. Therefore, the total power that the transmitter is capable of emitting is based upon the specifications of the linear power amplifier in the base station, rather than the number of "channels", or conversations taking place at any given time. The effective radiated power, or ERP, was calculated by starting with the maximum composite power that each LPA, or linear power amplifier, is capable of putting out (in this case, 20 Watts, which is the Motorola factory specification for the SC614 base station that will be installed at this site). Then the cable loss and antenna gain are factored in, which brings us to a maximum ERP of 213 Watts per sector, which is a "face", or one of the three different directional antenna arrays. There are three Page 1 RECEIVED JUN 0827. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION • h� j` Sheetl sectors in a standard site configuration such as this one, which makes the total possible ERP for the site 639 Watts. This figure is then factored into the standard power density formula described, and the result is a power density that is a very small percentage of the allowable FCC standard.. In this case, the AirTouch proposal is a collocation with Nextel Communications on their existing tower. Nextel engineers tell me that their site has a maximum effective radiated power (ERP)' of 100 Watts per sector Their installation consists of a two -sector configuration, so I have added 200 Watts of power to the AirTouch total ERP figure, making it 839 Watts for the two combined installations. In order to be able to provide a combined power density figure on one spreadsheet, I have assumed the Nextel radiation centerline to be the same as the AirTouch antennas (80 feet AGL) when in reality their centerline is 100 feet AGL. This is a negligible difference which makes the actual power density even less than the calculated value, which is still less than 2% of the allowable ANSI standard. 1 certify that this information was derived as described above and is a true and accurate representation Of a maximum possible total RF energy that could be emitted by this radio facility. Doug Picard Senior RF Engineer 0: Page 2 I! -------� I f F - U II II CASTnC IDICc — I m — I LLL AoI mAHC1 / j ., e• srRltc GATE wTE n ACCESS _ i I u • . • • - msn c Ec-lm / mCo J • n —' J' CONSTRUCTION NOT O MnW 69.37 LATTIW TOAER W.1 W.?`MV. LMa:-121W39.9-, 2ME 9, DEV. 17a3 Q moo= 61. OOTµ IAm, Pen mm 0 ALL A1C "mR 91µL cOHrmY r0 M[ sTAll Or CK foo AHO CWHr+ a Burr[ SP[OBCA110H$ • DE TA DESICNED BFB DRAVN -WEN CHECKED BPB DETAIL A" stAu: 10• SC61. BATTERY Lr CMORR R las' PAO OP1 S ENMOSM nsm scrAW 6D' [[HT[A Q M"SIO —I CH ANTENNA ARRAY CABDET sou -"TEO U9 c LOK Moms t; —COSTNO 89.5: IAIM TO. CA9MET FUT Bn NMR BENCHMARK: TM in- draw wm... tea"r0 CLE—ft Lissa DATUM: /ZSC6/At �D/GITAL LAYOUT fCALL..1• y 3' LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE w BY 3� —___.. i�tl1 +. •gym• mi DAIS . P,E. 11C4L \ ANTENNA ORIENTATION " NOT ro SCALL WGMA IDv 9DW IS FROM "ICs 7.s' OIMO rm �CHICO' TW c,LIUI we ROD m 6 STEEL 99.s• top AH -1-0+.3' BOTIDY 0/ AHTULNA 82.2' TOP Or NRTB1[M AHIEIMA +0.e• BOTTOA Of —MCH AMTEHHA 6D' [[HT[A Q M"SIO —I CH ANTENNA ARRAY (ALLODH 739'.M1 ANTEM.A SECTOR, J 10Tµ) TENHA'S SMALL B[ FLUSH -"TEO U9 c LOK Moms —COSTNO 89.5: IAIM TO. SOUTH ELEVATION SCAR: 1. 30• E105M0 "ICE �-p1 /• I ENSTnO BIRLODCS .�1 CAsnNG:ZEL1 '�\• SEE DESA/L A"� OVERALL SITE PLAN srxc r .IaD• SITE ADDRESS. OLtti G 93a11 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 006-40.0-0.56 OWNER: ww a AOL SnY11W IW S— HUtEr CI. otgq a waA APPLICANT: LriIMACrm A A[�YO1lnC /ER ARIOtA>I KOLCl C'ti9 AIM. JORRY JlOVAOKnAN Oro HmMD. a' B.O.. sure 160 sAmAYmta ulsono vseJl PHpE: (alb) ago-TTRn PREPARED BY. LAUo7KRM AID Aon& o DLasxrAs acn mwr srna'r ROODtAIEA W{O0u aS6a3 PHO1[: 'S"'7 LEGAL oESCR/PT/ON: ALL our ?Aron A rA PROPDPIY 91AlF n lAC COWIY W Blll[ STAR W cAtC & YOAC PARnDAARLY WSOL® As (BLOB` A AOTTO w LOT IJ AS SHOW M our CMF Y..P [Nn RtO /d[LOPoOr =WCOnry, f..tIDRIAA M YAAw '-t8Ox 6 W YAPS PAW 12 YO•R PAAJJC B I Ots1>1HD AS Fl>ZI oo NIROI .1 A AI nl[ MKnrCsr CUA O' SAO Lor 11 SAD PDnI YAAHEp er J/•' nw Pnc �M A nAsnc aw srAYr'm +Az 1660,)- AS 9DW M MAr Cmt YAP doom PAADQ YAP ; 'A DKADARY ut YDDrICA I LC A ro+LDVS W LOIS AZJ a 12 Or M LDtn— Hm suss AO ow- RLD n W OrtKC W nE wcowm Or WrTr co-'. c -OD -A MYARM 14 Ia61, n DOCK W O' YAPS PAW 4 .LMC Aq+M 69T6'IO• GSE IEEI, KO nC A - LK 07,5`0 or IA JO'W ICM P r O' BASIS Or BEARINGS. ME BA93 W aClft V5 K LAC SMM LAC Or LOT IJ AS 9D11N M —mYAP mnnm Your 1Q"A=M. Si gYM9OY AV 1. 11Im n OE *7xr a nC ftv R1W LK -,,r L1tOUY1Y,'GIF - m YA.NI 1 Ia10. N 80M i6 W YAPS PAW 12, BOD SQIM nv+e'a; No TES.- 1. ES:T, OmmAclm TO T W KAa1 crAcr tocA xvU woos AID PROPOSm sMttng Ar nw or coRsLRUCLKK a, mort ARC YD Pl"X AONO —OWflC M nKFOMM 1 8DLRMR1 1A /Bou RC =YAPS AAO OCms A M MAOM PAOmOSEO MR nas A+aArE MMAI WMAMS ALC TO M WLEM/ILD Br 0, HAnnC 3 DPMn r. 17 SITE p6m SCALE SHEET "NORTH ESPLANADE LEASE SITE"t a _ M E R I C 0 M uDrur: 2.85-9 1- C 0 R P 0 R A T 1 0 H Tr Or BUM ml— DAR: 5-12-00 RECEWED a11N 012000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION SITE AA — {Air ;I csr•—_— f n 1 - �I ANTENNA ORIENTATION VICINITY MAP NOT Ta SCALE �I �I Or ro •'^••r • WONA rAWI SIow. N,,M, Y.&as ,.f' cab fO!-CHICO- SITE ADDRESS: TOP W LI P,TNNG NOD TOP a stm 9Af' r0P Of INlE1MA 87.5' WrRN M ANTIDMA 6Lr TOP Or ANTgIp, "Tom, m.0' wa Of AJINI G AN,TIPIA MRXCIIA OI PNOPOYD AMTAUa ANTOOr1 ARRAr Acca „e,.aa ,ANTENNA SEC TON. ] UN.) YdrNTs 119SlOr PROrIIE ma To.w Am,aN„ tO.M -` o', *N>N 7✓,7\yw•,,fi1''a't1!:!"F_,77 MSS a VS'j- ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: OWNER: • EDSTdG rTNa j — ----,--,— I o LU l PSTN, � ? DosTWIG MALS E j r � i — e' slava un _------------- i _I J . ^ E � � — j allo a NDl sRfMMf In: sIG'� Y.WEr cc LIRE CA wn,J APPLICANT: GarRACTat R8,d4n%mE tar ANrOUp1 .fACRA1101tR4 ][AWIGOIA nsAN��µ PREPARED BY: ulmaAv Aro NWL O,a (rGrmtf EOl COW/safEr G1,G9.., DlQ9f C`L`4X HKPL• (}IOJ CL1-131 , . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: "s :a �r �cu�ooe�i"`r rsnni �as� Asnra 7 msnNG aEc PoaL1 aco�— /i j Ij _.•:._• r DETAIL A" j SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE. -,•.w� A vagina W Lor a As show a rNAr anew YAv D1nnm wrrmC—.a o0Aw A"MII 4 BO« Al 1- AAxMWEsr roam W SAV Aor 1; sAD ff mgor Or YA91ZD BY A 5/1- 1KN PPE rM A it MI PIYt AA4CEI D -. 16WA1" As LNorr a MAr aR,AN YAP d W I M UJ YAP: •A BouoARr 1s.[ YmeTCAna W A Pmriva W CON I,z, a lE W nr Yq W UI s1.a uA aC rW W N nE aJaE W r. R[OProm W Burr[ COIPIT: f.A1FO AKW a .ANN 14 E . BOa . W YAPS PAW 4 IV S, AORM Pn1P'b• USI. —1 rQr. 4 ME MO,M s, W SAD Eor I; ro IK rM.f PCDIr W aarnrAG sAD POI 1 AISD nit C — A. carni W 11r L O_ S WSfJDAm PAIGaL naw tt " `NDI E SIV SnD [ASIOSY WM ALM `Err N, EE saw 1aD noKC mots Anze:»• a �[R /WWo .` GOYrAIYo z BW =T;&CE A —r-- -- -- CONSTRUCTION NOTES O, EDSTNC Bn.3' sr. TOWER Mr_ WAr3W, ,ANG:-IN35,AY. EOE 2 CTEV. t3f O PRWSm 614 OIOTAE u,TNI PCA WTAN ,. .. scAlt o law ro orsua E �� II ♦;: STYIA SIA- i . ` �\ +' • \'Y X --NOTES: `� ` z _—_I 1 •` •�\` SEE DETAIL A"� � n� �, � BASIS OF BEARINGS: x BAss W 6CARPLS s n( scOM uE W ror a AS SIo,rr a —1 ariWYAvr [n = tr arm m�.NnY.�cu- 1. a 1 1.4 N BOa IS WYAPS PAW Is1w. 1. sr1pM, IIIRESAl r 7m�mPA } BCIRQANr IAADI rqa ASCao YAPS AAD OLmi A W WA[aF PRatl.� rOP IMs i1POLCt O ALL SITE IMIC 91N1 carats ro its STA,[ W CYJrORMA AXD CWNTr W BUTTE SI'EMCAn— A WTAg3. CABI12T rYTI N YPMN SEIBACAS ARE m BC WIEn1Ilm BY ME/gAIrIC S 0p'ARDpII. 1 SC614 DIGITAL LAYOUT OVERALL SITE PLAN scuE: , . tm• DE9m1ED BPB DRAWN WEN CHECNED BPB 8ENCH MARK: im v N®M NaMg l NNOi a LEASE 9rE. EIEVAT,R1: u&IK oATUY: dp�u LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE rYtY, �r 4!� BY SND E - DATE P.E. � rcw REOSTRATICN ERPMES 31-a •A%Aq •--•A•,a SITE PLAN fPN "NORTH ESPLANADE LEASE SITE" cLo q Ro n CT�o xL CUNry o arTtc CYswu SCALE AS SHOWN SHEET Al t WEN f- RE*= ANTUMA TYPE a Y IV8 rru e m �r.^�efaq .�r.m CAD RF: IaBS-9 a� 5-12-00 +oe NA 2aB5-9 a l N0. BY DATE REMSON DATE • MERICOM" C O R P O R A T 1 O N 4700 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 160 Sacramento, CA 95834 k. . Date: June 7, 2000 Phone: 530-538-7601 Fax: 530-538-7785 TRANSMITTAL Sent Via: U.S. Postal Service ❑ Blueprinter ❑ Express Delivery ® Other ❑ Courier ❑ From: Mericom Corporation .-• Mitrht-11 Phone: A1 R-99n-74nn Mobile: 916-717-31-953 Fax: 916-920-2343 ITEMS TRANSMITTED: Network Map for N. Esplanade Site The above information is confidential information intended only for the viewing and use of MERICOM CORPORATION and th--ir clients. Any unauthorized review, use, communication, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION .' -2- r l 0 0 A 0 0 0' � � � s Q s� s N g� s' s s � g s�• s s s g 0 m m �' aN me o.� M 0 m Z 2 = w Z Z~ 7C 2 N 4TJ s s g g s s s s she she s she ��es W po o e g oma. � v1 N L W� nogg In d 0 d 0 dr'o' o" lo, o" iii ii •-• % / /i/i i / /ii ol VIZ., -:o ;ov ui;" o' o 'p,r z '0' :o, ol If lo� Ale D // , o, osl o o /�/��i Y ://moi i/ / � �i S'• / � /� '' % ' . ��' ii 'lo, or i 4%/ i 'moi i i �� / iii iii i i o /e "Aloe � � � •moi � ./ / /, :,o // �� //00 / ...� A 10 �� co�%%wz /, ,� Z E.,. ol a / /ooll / NO— OV RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2000 AISOPNNNG DIIVIIIN I Date: Thu Jun i i0: 29: 81 2000' User: picardd Fila noJlortkSaplana-cov Projection Type Sacramento - LffW 10 Din Size: Calc - 12' Plot - 12' Plot Type Coverage (Color By Sector) Plot Patters Single Lire snort ML S MY SEC of ur m -434.W N LONE in -4m.00 N AIS: 1100.891`7 ANT' MIS - TxHt WAFT OfTilt 50' ML SKYiUY SH. 02 UT: D-".00 N LGIR 0-4M.00 N ANSL HOCA9FT AHC 7016 Tit WATT wk 250' CELL EAST PAWN SH: 01 Ur -11.00 N LIM i21-36-ii.00 N ANSL• 19 OIR ANC IIM-16A TxHt !15.001`7 OFITIt 95' \ CELL: EAST PARADISE SH: 02 UP B-4Hi.00 N LOW 0-36-!!.00 N AIS: 1950AR AMP 7430-6 TxHt MOOFT OTfTIt 25' mi: EAST PARADISE SEC 03 ur m-46-11.00 N Low !24-36-11.00 N AkL 0502FT ANC 1190j% TxBt MAR ORTTt 335' cELL LOS NOLIIl06 SHr 0i U7: 40-03-11.00 M LME 122-09'08.00 N AIR: 239.50FT ANC F8'90 -09 -OD TxHt 250.00FT 074Th 95' CHL LOS NOLDIDS �� SM 02 Ur 40- 3 7.00 N LONE 1221"AO N ANSL: 239.50F7 MT. F9-� TXHt MOO OAITt 245' � s \� \ �\� ` CHL: LOS NOM SH: 03' Ur 40-03-17.00 M LM 122-09-08.00 N ANSL• 239.50FT A IA, ANC F9-96-09-00 TxHt 250.00FT 57Th 335' �Nk \ CHL CMI NG SEC 01 Ur N*42.00 N LODE 122-f 448.00 N AIR: 298.00FT \` \ W. DBB40K XC TxHt 127.00FT ORM' C' \ ML WIMILTON Cm SEC. 01 ur 394248.00 N LONE 122"00-!0.00 N ANSL: 145.o0FT A DISE �` `ANT: WHOC Txk 1m.00FT Wm 0' \\ \CBL yu SEC 01 Ur 5-55'•20.5 N LONE 422-02-26.00 N AIS: 206.00FT IN N` \ \ANC ®84011 XC TxHt 481.OT OHfFt 0' CELL DED SED 01 Ur *44-00.00 N LONE 421-47-10.00 N AiR: 263.00FT ANC F9-90-09•DO TxHt 250.00FT IM 95' \\ N-\ �\ CBI. moo SEC 02 UT 3944-00.00 N LONE i2i-4710.00 N AIR: 263.OWT AMC F9'90 -*M Tfit 250.00F7 OHIlt 245' \\ CHL am SEC 03 UT 39-44-00.00 N LOVE IM -4740.00 N AIR: 263.00FT ANP 1`8'90'09'00 TxNt 2W.WT 13ft 335' CELL NA6 M SH: 01 UT: 3949-11 A0 W LONE 121-35-22.00 N a \ ` AIS: 2452.00FT ANr AW" -6 T* t '118.001`7 ORllt 0' `\ crattmaater MAP SCALE \\� 1:250000 + \\ 4 O 4 \�` \\ M11AB AIRTOUCH PHOENIX 3.7.2 i�L.�-a{.t „ - . ' .C'x4 : � . .. :dip ♦ I z.!,.1,r- @ JMLA JUN 01 � BUTTE COI PLANNING D. SITE TID u I! I 'j '/ EAST - -- 99 IS ON � ;I WIST---- BEL RO 3I 'I 31 II - ANTENNA ORIENTAT/ON VICINITY MAP •01100 NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE �_ M II • DisawAnav 9/oNN LS maw'"r 7.5 OLLAO iLw BCH/CO' SITE ADDRESS: J= ESPLANADE II ,I TDP OF LIGHTNING RCD C78OYA CA 9597J _ ASSESSOR S PARCEL NO.: �-�-056 DOSTING FENCE a TCP OF STEEL OWNER: DA1QD & NQL 37Ui0V5 j'- •— I 99.5' TOP OF ANTENNA 87.5' BOTTOM OF ANTENNA 0; m II 'I B2.7 TOP OF AIRTOUCH ANTENNA OF PR 78.8• BOTTOM OF AIRTOUCH ANTENNA NRTDIICH I!9? STOW VALLEY CT. CMG CA 94971 i ANTEKNAARMY ANTENNA CONTRACAPPTOR TAME FOR A� IDUCH MEMOOY CORP- ArIAL ERRY AAZMADAIOAN 4700 NORTWATE BLU). SUITE 100 P TOR. 3 TOTAL) ANTENNA'S SHALL BE FLUSH MOUNTED .USING LOW PROFILE EXISTING I / II J MOUNTS SAOPA6001% CALIFORNIA aWJ4 PHONE (916) 940-7900 .. EXISTING DOUBLE 6' SLING GATE GRAVE. % -1/49 -oulrn�Nc B�9s: E705TINC 10'ItZR PREPARED BY. LAI/�fCOURT' MO {tDO:E CLW. ENQNEIITS _ _ _ — - — — — — — — — — EMST1NG (RAVEL — — — — PROPOSED AIRTOUCH .� 609 COURT SDREEr _ (&V) � ' ACCESS ROAD, /. %,/ 1 I GRADE L i —A / �`_ , .> , ,... ,. ,..: = :: ,.:=:; .::::.':::.:-' ;•' : •'' =%z'= :. = ' . ` .... - .• .... • • . .. .. :. ... _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION. ALL THAT C! NTALN REAL PROPERTY SITUA/E 6V THE COUNTY OF SUM STA TE 01- CALIFORNIA. YORE PARTICULARLY OESMSED AS HS'L ORW ETSnNG ELECTRICAL /TELCO t j '. — SOUTH ELEVATION a Fmnw OF Lor IJ As &YowN av TNAr cERrAa YAP Emnam r SCALE t' - 30 . TH 'MOUNTAIN F NC 1, FILED ffifW DI£ CM:7C£ or E RECOf B TTE COU. -M. ON MARCH r 1948 N BOOK BUTTE cDI0RE I �r 16 OF AfADER . re cr ILAPS PAGE TZ :roRLr PARncuL.wLr DEs�oaem AS ItxLows AR77alLA W.- _ __ ___�. �.-.._._.1�-+•�_�s—...—_. — ^ � COMMENW4 AT THE AtlPTHNEST COWM OF SAID LOr 1x SAD POINT MARRED BY A J/4' LRCM/ PIPE W7H A PLtS IC PWG SrALPED VCE fWOJ' AS SNONN ON THAT a4TrAW MAP E7v»TLED'PARCEL MAP' A !' • BOUNDARY LIVE MCWIrA7I0N ar A PORTIONS OF LOTS 1.2J R 12 OF THE M"rAW WEW SIS. Na ONE' FTLED W THE OFFICE OF THE ' RECORDER QF-8UTTE WUM.. CALkD&" DV MARDI Id 1981. W BOGY 82 Of YAPS PALE It THENCE NORTH 8970'40' EAST. 82299 FEEF ALONG TIE NORTH LINE OF sw Lor a TO THE TRUE Pa91r or i� •. ETT' mm .sw Pmr ALSO save THE NCLRmvsr CC"o? OF 7N£ d,f HEREIN OE'SCRLBED PARCEL INENL:. CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LIVE: SOUTH 00'=0' EAST, 50.00 FEET' ""NCE SOUTH 8OW 31' [705T'FENCER NEST SODO DEFT 70 THE PONT OF B£GNNIN[Z` CONTAINING 25000 OR SOVARE FIXT Maw LESS DETAIL »A»PROPETY ER SNE - 10 0 3 10 `•1\ :;,. '' I BASIS OF BEAR/NGS: THE BASS ar SEAR/NGS IS TILE SOUTH UNE OF LOT tJ AS SHOW ON ' AL SCL'_ 1' a 10' �pp��' ♦ (Y ,' •c ' . . - ♦ : �� I \ - o ;\j•�\``• ". �•'� I • `' ••,•\S 7HAr ceumV MM ENTITLED MOUN7AN NEM AUBUHAQY No. 1. PB£D N THE OFFICE OF 7FE RECORDER OF BUTTE COUNTY, CAUPORWA ON MARCH 1 1944 IN GOOK IB OF NAPS PACE I2 BEING SOUTH �� BUILDINGS - 1C % • . `� ;:. ' �- -TT - - - - - - -- - \, -. S k.) F9CISTING'GILAVEL NOTES: . E P C0/4GIffiiE PAD\�.. SCT14 BATTERY � `"G Lr _ \ L ) � ' I - - �- I. CLN1fUCTt7R /O FJQD FE7A'F•Y EXACT LOGt11OIV5 CM' DUSTING CONSTRUCTION NOTES: oPnoFls L7GaoaRE ( GIT ABINET \-.�n — _- .`•� .. �-` - s=^ =^= = � - — -_a� . • — I AND PROPOSED 57RVCnIRES AT 77M£ OF LClmmuct7OV. C) E705nNG ass LATTICE mwER (LAT.: 39'4T20.8', LONG- -121SY39.9'. ZONE 2 EI.EV. 1713 - 1 II 1 t 1'I -�\\ \ "� DETAIL A 2 THERE ARE NO PUBUC ROAD IMPROYDMDv/5 PRCflCI¢'D. S BOUNDARY 7AA't7V fAgl RECORD YAPS MO DEEDS, 11 SEE z0 PROPOSED 614 DIGITAL LAYOUT PER DETAIL 1. 4. NO OIUOR4C PROPOSEDPaa n05 PRO ECT. O ALL 9tE WORK SHALL CONFORM 10 THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SC S14 CARNET --- ---' SUTUREFUTU TS ,� MINIMUM SE78ACT15 ARE ID BE DE7ERMINED BY THE Pi'.ANLNC ID ACOUNTY OF BUTTE SPECIFICATIONS& DETAILS. I S DLPAR7MENr. OVERALL SITE PLAN 1 SC614 DIGITAL LAYOUT 100 0 b 1W . SCALE: I' >• Y . SCALE 1, - TDO' DESIGNED BPB BENCH MARK: TOP 3/4' REBAR NORTHWEST CORNER OF LEASE SITE. LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE o� LSS, ,� r 4"' �` 'b ^� BY Ptru uou44Atru LAMP ■urrrrlro r�ArrtxP SITE PLAN I FOR SCALE A$ SHOWN SHEET Al DRAWN WEN BRYAN P. BONING xo. naw e .NORTH ESPLANADE f LEASE SITE' OF }: LAMENOUR AND MDRIL 4 CAD FILE: 2485-9 CHECKED BPB DATE P.E 41t7GT4 CIVIL V•'�'O>rjl�F� � + M E R I C 0 M I COUNTY OF BUTTE. CALIFORNIA � --r- -caw'-.. �"_"°O1'o9S ^•a'F I>b7 !•1 rY DATE: 5-12-00 1 WEN 5-29 REVISED ANTENNA TYPE h MOUNTING. BPB i NO. BY DATE REVISION UDATE ,IDB NO. 2485-9 ELEVATION: X75-38' DANu: NAWZ REGISTRATION EXPIRES O}31-04 F+<raxl I�1-.eoz C 0 R P 0 R , r 1 0 N , � A. JUN -0 121 PLANNING Dn lI �z EDNORD Kw EMAP HEST. BELL RD ONV/ ANTENNA OR/ENTAT/ON ,I NOT TO SCAI c NOT TO SCALE I • OECLNA110V 3HONN I.S npw.USGS 7.3 QUAD FOR 'CHICO SITE ADDRESS. X, n02 ESPLANADE II TOP of LIGHTNING Roo CN= GA 95973 ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.: 006-400-056 ' DOSTING FENCE - - - - - - - - 4 TOP STEEL OWNER: DAMD a NELL 57EPHENS . • !% 99.5' TOP OF ANTENNA Ems' BOTTOM OF ANTENNA B2.i TOP OF NRTOUCH ANTENNA 4191 S7CNE VALLEY Cr. CNIM CA W97J _ m T�/� M �I II 7&8• BOTTOM OF AIRTOUCH ANTENNA A1RTpUCF: ANTENNAW CENTER Of ARRAY (A,LGON 7391.00, 1 ANTENNA APPLICANT. CONTRACTOR R£PRESONTA77YE FOR A1R70UCN 4 7NGAIE IQ, SUITE �AOAlBAN '�'"IS PER SECTOR. 3 TOTAL) ANTENNA'S SHALL BE FLUSH MOUNTEO.USNG LOW PROFILE / (�� Y I MOUNTS SACRAMENICL CILFOBBA B,iBJ4 EXISTING DOUBLE I �VEEL I m 1 —�ING B AYOVE (916) 910-7900 PREPARED BY.• 8' SWNG GALE E)GSTING 10•¢20• '. LAU(.U71OUR AND AEBQC CIVIL ENGNEII75 — — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — / / PROPOSED AIR70UCH SCO14 EQUIPMENT & PAD FINISH 606 COURT Si17EET SOCO ANO. GAUFORIWA 94691 EMSIING GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD i /` 1 % :I - \ GRADE L PHONE (130) 662-1733 • i ..... • f ., • ... • • . • . ... ` . • . ,. .. , .. .. .: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ALL THAT CLRrAN REAL PROPERTY 9TUA iE N THE COUNTY OF 8UTIIE DUSTING ELECTRICAL / TELCO / `SrA7E OF CALFORNIA, MORE PM7ICULAftY DESOWED AS F=0195" — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — i SOUTH ELEVA TION A PORTION OF LOT 13 AS SHONN ON THAT CERTAN MAP FNDRM �. SCALE I• s JO' VOUNTAN NEN' 9UBQNSON NO. 1'" FILED IN THE OFFTTE OF THE • , RECORDER OF BUTTE COUNTY, CALFORNN ON HURON 1 194$ N BOOK 16 OF MARS PACE Tz MORE PARDQIARt Y OESCId'9ED AS FOELONS — . — •—_'—''— `J"• "' �.`—_�" _ COMMENCM AT IT(E NGRTNNEST CORNER OT SND LOT 1,7; SAID PONT MARKED BY A J/4• IRON PIPE NTH A RAS77C PWG SrMLPED 17CE IWDJ' AS SHOW ON INAT CERTAN NAP ENTIFIED 'PARCEL MAP, 'A OM04 RY LNC MODIFICATION OF A PORT/ONS OF L07S 12J & 12 W THE MOUNTAN WEE SUB. NO ONE' FXED IN THE OFFICE OF THE ' - RECORDER OF BUTTE COUNTY, CALFURNK dN MARCH 18 1981. N BOOL 82 OF MAPS PAGE 4*, THENCE ACRIN 8976'40' EAST. 82299 . FEET. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 14 TO THE TRUE PgNT O' B£dNNTM SAID PONT ALSO WNC THE NORI EAST CO%fER O< THE - HERQN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LNE SOUTH OOMY20' EAST, 10.00 FEET; 7H00C£ SOUTH 887871' OUSTING FENCE R // PPEATr UNE NEST, Saw FEET m lHE PONT Or BLrmININ4` CQITAIaNG 2,1DO0 SQUARE FRET• MOS QP LESX DETAIL »A» L — — — —. — • —' — — — —' — —' 10 9 5 19 `• BASIS OF BEARINGS: -d- SCALE: 1' m ,0' • \\- .' - '' THE 9495 OF BEARINGS S THE SOUTH UAE OF LOT IJ AS SHOW ON • "• i THATQRTNN MAP ENTITLED MOUNTAN NEIN' SI/BONSIUN NO. 1. FILED � N THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF BUTTE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA ON EIOSTMG I MARCH I F944 N BOOK 16 OF MAPS PACE 12 BEING SOUTH • \\. `.;; BUILDINGS 8976'40'. . - ,0' X ,0.5',,°' coNGRETE PAO SC814 BATTERY \M1 `y\�\`,\..' / __ __. E7L15TInG GRAVEL i I i t� I I •::�•�aJl NOTES. 110 FIELD EXACT LOCA HUNS OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION NOTES: OPTIONS ENCLOSURE TFSOO SERVICE CABINET. _` \•\\ �\ "_ �� -rt ="_ _==^ =-" I �• 1. CCNTRACMR VMFY AND PRO°OSED S7RUC7UAE5 AT TIME Q CONSTRUCTION. O1 EIOS89-5-NG Ere' LATTICE TOWER (LAT.: 39.4726.6•. LONG; -1217739.9•. ZONE 2. EL.EV. 17a3 ---- , 1 11 \.:. .``\\� �j z TF@RE ARE NO FuSuC ROAD AlPROVENDNTS PROPOSED. 3: BOUNDARY TAKEN FROM RECORD MAPS AND O®s �� / yL SEE DETAIL A"/ , OIL PROPOSED 614 DIGITAL LAYOUT PER DETAIL 1. O ALL SITE NORM SHALL CONFORM TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SCSI 4 CABINET --- SE05114 SYS I �� �� a NO GRAONC PRaysED rw THIS PROET:T. MINIMUM SETBACKS ARE ID BE DETERMINED BY THE PLANING AND COUNTY OF BUTTE SPECIFICATIONS d DETAILS. S DEPARTMENT. OVERALL SITE PLAN 1 SC614 DIGITAL LAYOUT 100100 SCAIE , • IS SCAB 1' a 100' DESIGNED 8P8 BENCH MARK: 3/4' REBAR NOR iHN£ST CORNER OF LEASE SITE. LAUGENOUR AND .MEIKLEv.r,� ,�•o" '�'%` B '6 '6 8Y C1r1L 4"nu4e"a° ►III'L'►►t--,II111�A.1111�////Al,�'I111 uNa •KKr"mo LJJ V U """" SITE PLAN FOR SCALE AS SHOWN SHEET AlOP I"1 DRAWN WEN - BRYAN P. BONING S x• �1 "NORTH ESPLANADE LEASE SITE" GF UUCEWBR AND NDKLE CAD FILE-- 2x85-9 CHECKED 8P8 ELEVATION: 175.38• DATUM: NAVD 27 DATE —P E. 4I� _ - _ - "; CIHL REGISTRATION EXPIRES.' 0.1-31-0A T'o:_I•y.'� M E R I C 0 M COUNTY OF BUTTE. CAUFORNIA � _ eoe «w's+.m�c .cm.v.n c. vevF F r(f.wl snl-.am 1 WEN 5-29 REVISED ANTENNA TYPE k MOUNTING. BPB 52'c5 Dae no. BY OATS REVISION OAS o. C9 C 0 R 9 0 R A r 1 0 N IL .D . EPARTM[EINT OF DEVELOPMENT� SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on otber side: nrrarl`-�u'' 1 Zi NAME ( If applicant is diffeeat fkom owner as &Mdsvit is required ) AlerricDm Cuero r1i2 —r0 1�eL✓cam ADDRESS. CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE q-700nlor+l��.c�� glUd. 5��•�. !!�0 x�r✓ CA9sB�� NAME OF PROPOSED PRoj& T (If any ) /V. LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross streets and Address. if any) GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER. 00(0 - g O D --Q (a FILE NL%ffi R (E%oMCE- m/ip /-)In_ r TELEPHONE (q/( ) 7/7-- - OWNER'S NAME c .'s-�r IDD' ht on o fl(Pi D` 50` Daqc- 6A,- + S� e crI s' TFZ.FPFIONE 2 1 n rem a s c-4 ` l��( d -o ADDRESS: 0) ,S'�.?(Q S' `60 aeloi h e4s . 41 Lam✓ pr lL G�-�/u2_ CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE 54DAC- ��U� G�• Cit; arem ca � � , ZONE GIIVIItAL PIAN (EMSTefo LAND USE SITE S¢E (a Square Feet cc Acres ) ':;_ C�o� Gy`GiG,� �G�� 'CAh+M✓/),�CGt'iAr1S -rCa,4 l: � o� S�� Jr. T - EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Foes) PROPOSED STRU (ia Square Fed) ` E s i DD ` �vlon o a/v p14CL- CLp%" e -s cL* 90 • leArc( d- in ` s4-cU t ID. Se , ((pct Ox) /^ (C.'bmk One) _ [3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED `/ ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER i.ti.'..-. , y.�....a x• N• ,, APPLICATION REQUESTED .=s.r�}.:>..;,nj :. O': w �yits .:i•ka.:� . ❑ GENERAL PIAN AMENDMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP "{ . ❑REZONE ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ US PERMIT REC�� c3 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP MINOR USE PER.WT JUN 0 8 2000 ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ VARIANCE E3LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION �. �y,C E3 MINOR VARIANCE BUTTE C 0??�TTy �A ti?;� t UT v?SION ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER '.� ❑ ADM [NISTRATIYE PERMIT ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN '• ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ OTHER . s,il'.. �%.'' may.=;i ,;:, � y. ... ry: ,_ •, r� '.a: � w %j :�. �,i >•::. : iC'��1'�•..:� / •+"sX' ` •.z lea �'r _ ... _ ....... _ . /o-'cr a ..•._ �.•.<^_' PRnIFCT 1lFC('D fD'rTnty •Si �%': � :t: ai.' '..'' :..3t?T.'tr:r?.�. _..1n' .: FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division , describe me number aad size of parcels.) --j"'kc re– i S Gt1 c .'s-�r IDD' ht on o fl(Pi (.-� � f� ►.! c`. D` 50` 1 n rem a s c-4 ` l��( d -o ,,.- � G `60 aeloi h e4s . 41 Lam✓ pr lL G�-�/u2_ w, .-. •eK ti. ir arem - vw,ttx CtK I lt•ICATiON .. .. � - � ' � . I CERTIFY THAT I A -M PRESE"i1.Y THE LEGAL OWYER OR THE AL" iHOR= AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE A90VE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER. I ACK.NOWLEXE THE FILL`tG OF THIS APPLICATION A.YD CERTtFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE I`FORN(ATION IS TRUE AXD ACCLRATE (If sn igcnt u to be wthmized. eznyte 3n zfftdavit of authorization UW uxtude the uTtdavit with aw 3pp4cui0n.) DATE. 5' f Z/O0 SIGNATURE /rern", � ��_ r" • COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By project Applicant) Date Filed 5 2 S�CYS General Information: 1. Name and addresq. of owger, and/or developer, and/or proje gloo (?(qk S":fit [too 2. Address of project n Assessor's Parcel Number: 00(y -q00 -1-057(a 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be con, roh-, DCG L✓Gc., K700 pjo, R,:i4 e - Sc C,_A_ 95 B 3 9 l G 7 t'1— 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public those required by.city, regional, state and federal agendew, sponsor. M� ;ed concerning this project: ✓d . S.. ;k-- '16;0 S. Existing general plan designation: 6. Existing zoning d akt: G - -Z- 7. 7. Now is land currently used? .lc�l� c-6on.., 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this fpprm Is Med): C D- -4 l .-" ---1.. - . c �. -t RD ` I -Z e. .L b7 Project,D.escription: for this project, include 9. Site size: 2, S;90 S!I- -14:1 - (Acres/Sq. Fee 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: ��� Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes�_ 12. Proposed development schedule M kne-r- 13. Associated projects hot 14. Anticipated Incremental or phased development Attach description of project containing the following Information: . 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, ard type of household size expected. dlPr 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footace of sale area and loading facilities. IVT 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. A!/`}- ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 1 18. If institutional, Indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,; loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. Ar//:. 19. If the project imrohres a variance, conditional use, re=ni V applicadon, or any development permits, state thi,, and indicate ci arly why the application is required. If pem b have already been Issued, please attach az Exhbi t i4 Are the following Items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checkec yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change In scenic views or vistas from axi ng residen0al areas or public lands or roads. _ 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. _ 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _ 25. Change in bay, lake; river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration ofexisting drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 27. Site on filled .land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. _ 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). _ -30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. _ ie O Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 9 Environmental Setting: (Aft''ch brief desc ipdon) 52e-, CA -Jeo�. ocr� p 32. Describe the project elle as It sA is before the project, Including lnformatlon on topography, soil stabilitf,. plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any exbring structures on theses and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos VIII be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, tfrs6dcal, or scenic aspectts. Indicate the type of land use (reeidenllal, commercial, etc.),. intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (helght frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification 1 hereby certify that the statements fumished above and in the attached exhibb present the data -and information required for #6 Mal evahmtlon b the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signature for L4 KAFORMSISUBMITTAUEW4NFO '0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 3 I -� �10 DETAIL on Ov 400') 'q . n 47-27 MCJUNTAIN VIEW SU& NO I. , 16 M.O.R. 12 I 5 4 81.9 . 0 ;-40 G'411Cz7 PIQ-Ppl2-T-:V� C-Nyov F - ol) I "= 600' 4 2s sit `s Y (8- 4 2.0 AC 41 O: 83 '� Pm In-srs DETAIL "A" i ( 1", +00') i I i Assessor's Mop. No. 06-40 Count o f Y Butte, CA. - � REVISED: I RECE��T� # 1 *---------------------- Met c�a%V------------------------* Owner :Stephens David L & Nell Parcel :006 400 056 Site :3902 Esplanade Chico 95973 BUTTE COUNTY fered :12/17/1996 Mail :3902 Esplanade Chico Ca 95973 DIVISIONrice Use :2000 Com, Commercial (General) p�jN1NG Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac: 4.84'. # 2 *---------------------- MetroScan / •------------------------* Owner :Hamre Equipment Incorporated Parcel :006 400 021 Site :3930 Esplanade Chico 95973 Xfered :06/27/1997 Mail :3930 Esplanade Chico Ca 95973 Price Use :2000 Com, Commercial (General) - Phone :530-895-8955 Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac: # 3 *---------------------- MetroScan / ------------------------* Owner :Bettencourt Thomas & Darleen Parcel :006 400 023 Site :3880 Esplanade Chico 95973 Xfered :08/17/1999 Mail :3544 Bridle Ln Chico Ca 95973 Price :$209,000 Full Use :1101 Res, Duplex (2 Units, Any Combinati Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac: # 4 *---------------------- MetroScan / •------------------------* Owner :Sunset Hills Golf Course Inc Parcel :006 400 025 Site :Esplanade Chico Xfered Mail :Vandyke.Lola 1461 Hooker Oak Chico Ca 95926 Price Use :9112 Exmp Inst, Private Utility Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac: # 5 *----------------------: MetroScan / •------------------------* Owner :Sunset Hills Golf Course Inc Parcel :006 400 026 Site :Esplanade Chico Xfered Mail :1461 Hooker Oak Ave Chico Ca 95926 Price Use :9112 Exmp Inst, Private Utility Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac: # 6 *---------------------- MetroScan / •------------------------* Owner :Laforce James W & Dona K Jt Parcel :006 400 033 Site :Ocean Dr Chico Xfered Mail :1552 Winkle Dr Chico Ca 95926 Price Use :7006 Agr, Vineyard Phone :530-342-8411 Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pcc-": B1dgSF: Ac: # 7 *---------------------- MetroScan / •------------------------* Owner :Evans Brenda T Family Trust Parcel :006 400 034 Site :4275 Ocean Dr Chico 95973 Xfered :08/31/1995 Mail :4.275 Ocean Dr Chico Ca 95973 Price Use :7005 Agr, Orchard (Fruit; Nuts) Phone :530-343-7286 Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac: # 8 *----------------------: MetroScan / •------------------------* Owner :Mcdonald Family Real Property Irr Tr Et Al Parcel :006 400 059 Site :13407 Garner Ln Chico 95973 Xfered :08/03/1995 Mail :13407 Garner Ln Chico Ca 95973 Price Use :2000 Com, Commercial (General) Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac:9.09 # 9 *---------------------- MetroScan / •------------------------* Owner :Peacher Robert & Nickie Parcel :007 420 006 Site :13512 State Highway 99 N Chico 95973 Xfered :10/20/1999 Mail :3107 Highway 99 N Chico Ca 95973 Price Use :5000 Ind, Industrial (General) Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac:4.85 # 10 *----------------------: MetroScan / •------------------------* Owner :Schroeder Thyra K Trust Parcel :007 420 007 Site :*No Site Address* Xfered :05/18/1992 Mail :18 Adair Ct Danville Ca 94526 Price Use :9100 Exmp Inst, Institutional Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac:9.27 # 11 *---------------------- MetroScan / ----------------------- —* Owner :Pleasant Valley Baptist Church Of Chico Parcel :007 420 062 Site :13539 Garner Ln Chico 95973 Xfered :10/01/1997 Mail :355 Panama Ave Chico Ca 95973 Price Use :9100 Exmp Inst, Institutional Phone :530-343-0555 # 12 *---------------------- MetroScan / ---------------------- —* Owner :A & S Ranches Inc Parcel :006 010 106 Site :99 Wilson Landing Rd Chico Xfered Mail :5018 Wilson Landing Rd Chico Ca 95973 Price Use :7001 Agr, Farm (Irrigated Or Dry)- - _ Phone --:530-342-8832 ^^ ^, Smooth Feed SheetSTM I I i Use template for 51600 006 010 106 006 400 021 006 400 023 A & S RANCHES INC HAMRE EQUIPMENT INCORPORA Thomas & Darleen Bettencourt 5018 Wilson Landing Rd Harare Equipment Dba 3544 Bridle Ln Chico, CA 95973 3930 Esplanade Chico, CA 95973 Chico, CA 95973 006 400 025 006 400 026 006 400 033 SUNSET HILLS GOLF COURSE INC SUNSET HILLS GOLF COURSE INC James & Dona Laforce i DBA SUNSET HILLS GOL Lola Vandyke 1552 Winkle Dr Vandyke Lola 1461 Hooker Oak 1461 Hooker Oak Ave Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 ; 006 400 034 006 400 059 007 420 006 i EVANS BRENDA T FAMILY TRUST MCDONALD FAMILY REAL PROPE Robert & Nickie Peacher Brenda Evans Wayland McDonald 3107 Highway 99 N 4275 Ocean Dr 13407 Garner Ln Chico, CA 95973 Chico, CA 95973 Chico, CA 95973 007 420 007 007 420 062 Thyra Schroeder & Thyra Schroeder PLEASANT VALLEY BAPTIST CHU 18 Adair Ct 355 Panama Ave Danville, CA 94526 Chico, CA 95973 J 1 I i I I A� AVERY@ Address Labels Laser 55WM I 1 I t j7a AV ERY AVERY v ME FI AVERY EAV ERY AVERY P ERY Smooth Feed SheetSTM Use template for 51600 006 010 106 006 400 021 006 400 023 A & S RANCHES INC HAMRE EQUIPMENT INCORPORA Thomas & Darleen Bettencourt 5018 Wilson Landing Rd Hamre Equipment Dba 3544 Bridle Ln Chico, CA 95973 3930 Esplanade Chico, CA 95973 Chico, CA 95973 006 400 025 006 400 026 006 400 033 SUNSET HILLS GOLF COURSE INC SUNSET HILLS GOLF COURSE INC James & Dona Laforce DBA SUNSET HILLS GOL I Lola Vandyke 1552 Winkle Dr Vandyke Lola 1461 Hooker Oak 1461 Hooker Oak Ave Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 006 400 034 006 400 059 007 420 006 EVANS BRENDA T FAMILY TRUST MCDONALD FAMILY REAL PROPE Robert & Nickie Peacher Brenda Evans Wayland McDonald 3107 Highway 99 N 4275 Ocean Dr 13407 Garner Ln Chico, CA 95973 Chico, CA 95973 Chico, CA 95973 007 420 007 007 420 062 i Thyra Schroeder & Thyra Schroeder PLEASANT VALLEY BAPTIST CHU 118 Adair Ct 355 Panama Ave Danville, CA 94526 i Chico, CA 95973 I I 1 1 I i i 1 I I I J *AVERY@ Address Labels Laser 5560"" 'VERY AVERY AVERY P ERY Smooth Feed SheetsTM 006 010 106 A & S RANCHES INC 15018 Wilson Landing Rd Chico, CA 95973 i 006 400 025 SUNSET HILLS GOLF COURSE INC DBA SUNSET HILLS GOL Vandyke Lola 1461 Hooker Oak Chico, CA 95926 006 400 034 EVANS BRENDA T FAMILY TRUST Brenda Evans 4275 Ocean Dr Chico, CA 95973 007 420 007 Thyra Schroeder & Thyra Schroeder 18 Adair Ct Danville, CA 94526 i 006 400 021 HAMRE EQUIPMENT INCORPORA Hamre Equipment Dba 3930 Esplanade Chico, CA 95973 1 006 400 026 SUNSET HILLS GOLF COURSE INC Lola Vandyke 1461 Hooker Oak Ave Chico, CA 95926 006 400 059 MCDONALD FAMILY REAL PROPE Wayland McDonald 13407 Garner Ln Chico, CA 95973 ,r 007 420 062 PLEASANT VALLEY BAPTIST CHU 355 Panama Ave Chico, CA 95973 Use template for 51600 006 400 023 Thomas & Darleen Bettencourt 3544 Bridle Ln Chico, CA 95973 006 400 033 James & Dona Laforce 1552 Winkle Dr Chico, CA 95926 007 420 006 Robert & Nickie Peacher 3107 Highway 99 N Chico, CA 95973 A� AVERY@ Address Labels Laser 5560 TM r ' I i i I i i I I I I i ' I , ii i A� AVERY@ Address Labels Laser 5560 TM AVERY EAV ERY AVERY AV ERY P ERY AVERY AVERY pPgNVJa ERY u ' I3B1.3 3 4 %482.1 _� ? MICHELLE cr _ 4 _ 5 59 (71 0 2!1" s. 3-26 o h 24-3F-- ----- 436Ac •9 2 /t 2131 $ (61 4.344C 23.41 AC N -01 ►t6 PAI 70-7891 ----- - -- ---- - - - --- 13w, PM 77- 90t 6 7 -03 AC 21 /4 (3) —r — Z. , ' PM42-12t lr 15 ?� 2/S ----- -16 ------- -- 12.01 AC 403 PAI 860 to- .79 o 21 (/ / 3 1/60.Q3 • , O VALLEY CT - - - - A 56 O 18 po AC 23 - -----j 3 1 /4 1 4 59 3 PM 82- ® 970.3 9 &ACT _2� r' 25 ; sus ,�J-t pT-55 . Ja; No 32 a2 26 �' 08 msNt� 3x2127 � -1 6 y�x - 2 1 30 .� R �o lo � .61�r ^"� ss-4� 6 �j pM 83 -T9 28 36� 90 D Ait ..A« S TO 29 8.10 AC YBP00. 1PM S� 36 O •��, 22.77AC `�.a :�� /� ' 400.11 2' .1121 G 37•61 482.10 - EQS --- ---- O ;25.265 2-1 � 59 o -7,56 - -� — - - — — 24 - ----- 1.36Ac aD 2 It 21 t 3� $ (6) 4.3!AC Q 23.41 AC 62 N Of rt6 AM 70-7B 9, ----- --- ---- - - - --- 13 . PM 77-901 6 7 A3AC 23 /4 % 0 f31 3 ' S - PM62-48 I 1 . PM42-121/_ /5 2 t 45" 215 ---- - ------ 16 12.01Ac PAI 860 l°5 .79 21 fl 3 40476- 1/60.03 — _ — — A 56 Ail VALLEY CT . /8 v po-9.-IOAC , 3 PAI a 970.3 9 -2� 25 ' ••, z''t m 6. AC OT -55 e� ao 32 tea, 26 �` 463.08 m JNA / •�� 3t2� O27 .0 31 34 64316,67yes R- .00, 4g�Mfit 4, X03 O35 P360.90 SEE .. « 28 11 DETAIL A 29 8.70 AC STONYBR00. 36 O •��, pp 22.77AC -a tb� l� ' 4 .112, G 37 ��1 ' �,, 1Z a •6/ tS� ```•� . � p �� t PSV .�` -. /38/.3 482. IOYS d MICHELLE Cr pu � 3 4 5 4' ' s— �:---- . 590 2•/ 0 h /: ai 2 31 62 l61 234/ AC +��� Q . PM 7048 % rt6 (91 , 13 ' PM 77- 902 6 7 X03 AC 2 s jj lsl 14 S -- (/O ------ f PM62-48 1 / —r - t 43t"• PM42-122 /t 15 2r ' 403. ----- - -------- -- 16 12.0/AC PM 86° l°3 •AC 21 (/ i' 3 2 ;1..�6- //60.03 SUO. --- ---- ° /7 Ail 4VALLEY CT ---/ --- A 56O 18 9: IOAC ' 1 i �r — -----� ' '' 23 4 59 3 . . 14 O 0 3 PM 82- --; '. 9 970.3 -2, - - ap 25 2�t@26m 600AC i N •No 32 �-, �` 463.08 07-55 3Z2� ' 27 O34 6. 7y 4R_61 i ,r rw �s-n 309.01 �1A• � •c�p00 4 pM 83 -79 g0 SEE N N 3SO 35 28 360 G DETAIL A STONYBVRoo. R 36 A�1 • 39 29 8.70 AC PM\3� 00 22 77AC '�.� �,� 1• • 4 00.1/2, G •6/ tS� Yr7� X10 OETAIL Bpti 0"a a 400') 1 -ti 47-27 I.UUN IAIN VIEW SUB NO /. , 16 M.O. R. 12 u 514 819 C- NL1o0 F ? - 0950 DETAIL "A" ( /".1,400) Assessors Mop. No. 06-40 " County of Butte, CA. REVISED: t Al� ,�,t n J� fi 3x S. its l•..;- �' t74. ,v.�': � �ti � �'r b {7 _ �i�l ��k �n Yi � 3�35�`r7x� .•`'�'r'� r� y} h �t�" �`„�"„,k�. k GENERAL NOTES 1- 7 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS, EXISTING CONDITIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF THE JOB SITE PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME. 2. FIGURED DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR WORK PROCEEDING IN A SAFE AND ORDERLY MANNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. CONTRACTOR AND/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES MUST IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY UNSAFE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF WORK. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY, MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CODES BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THE WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT AND THE MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. 5. THE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, LABOR AND ALL OTHER MATERIALS AND LABOR DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK/PROJECT AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. PROJECT SUMMARY 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S / VENDOR'S SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER, THE CONTRACT. 0. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, PAVING, CURBING, ETC. DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE GENERAL WORK AREA CLEAN AND HAZARD FREE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS, RUBBISH AND REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY. PREMISES SHALL BE LEFT IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. 10• THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED FOR 24"x36" (SIZE D). DO NOT SCALE OTHER SIZED VERSIONS OF THESE DRAWINGS. IV, I *- 11 GENERAL LEGEND xxSECTION NUMBER ILK SHEET NUMBER DRAWING SECTION SECTION NUMBER x x—x SHEET NUMBER n rTnu SECTION NUMBER SHEET NUMBER J DETAIL ENLARGEMENT NTS = NOT TO SCALE SITE NUMBER: SF03UB322 t DAVID & NELL STEPHENS SITE DATA: TITLE SHEET GENERAL NOTES 1- 7 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS, EXISTING CONDITIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF THE JOB SITE PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME. 2. FIGURED DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR WORK PROCEEDING IN A SAFE AND ORDERLY MANNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. CONTRACTOR AND/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES MUST IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY UNSAFE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF WORK. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY, MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CODES BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THE WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT AND THE MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. 5. THE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, LABOR AND ALL OTHER MATERIALS AND LABOR DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK/PROJECT AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. PROJECT SUMMARY 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S / VENDOR'S SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER, THE CONTRACT. 0. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, PAVING, CURBING, ETC. DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE GENERAL WORK AREA CLEAN AND HAZARD FREE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS, RUBBISH AND REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY. PREMISES SHALL BE LEFT IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. 10• THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED FOR 24"x36" (SIZE D). DO NOT SCALE OTHER SIZED VERSIONS OF THESE DRAWINGS. IV, I *- 11 GENERAL LEGEND xxSECTION NUMBER ILK SHEET NUMBER DRAWING SECTION SECTION NUMBER x x—x SHEET NUMBER n rTnu SECTION NUMBER SHEET NUMBER J DETAIL ENLARGEMENT NTS = NOT TO SCALE SITE NUMBER: SF03UB322 PROPERTY OWNER: DAVID & NELL STEPHENS SITE DATA: TITLE SHEET SITE NAME: MUD CREEK PLOT PLAN 3902 ESPLANADE CHICO, CA 95973 LATITUDE: 39'47'27" 2 TRUE NORTH DRIVING LONGITUDE: 121'53'41 " SITE ADDRESS: 35973 ESPLANADE CHICO, CA 95973 APPLICANT: UBIQUITEL ELEVATION: 171.1' 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE, SUITE A USGS MAP: N/A UPDATED SHEET INDEX 1 06/29/00 CHICO, CA 95973 0 06/23/00 DEED BOOK PAGE: BOOK 16, PAGE 12 CONTACT PERSON: STEVE RUPPENTHAL PARCEL NUMBER: 006-400-056 (530) 897-5005 REFERENCE MAP: LOT NUMBER: 13 PAGE: N/A CURRENT ZONING: C-2 COMMERCIAL 2 JURISDICTION: BUTTE COUNTY GRID: N/A SHEET INDEX N0. SHEET TITLE NO. T—i TITLE SHEET p Z—i PLOT PLAN 1 Z-2 ELEVATION, SITE PLAN, &DETAILS 2 TRUE NORTH DRIVING DIRECTIONS FROM: 140,E INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE, TAKE HWY 99 NORTH AND LEFT ON ESPLANADE. 2 07/05/00 UPDATED SHEET INDEX 1 06/29/00 UPDATED SHEET INDEX 0 06/23/00 ISSUED FOR ZONING PROJECT DESRIPTION INSTALLATION OF THE UBIQUITEL WIRELE`.SS COMMUNICATION FACILITY CONSISTING OF SEVEN EQUIPMENT CABINET (3 INITIAL, 41 - FUTURE). ANTENNAS CONSIST OF (3) SECTORS WITH (2) INITIAL AND (1) FUTURE. PANEL ANTENNAS AT EACH SECTOR LOCATED AT AN ANTENNA CENTER OF 60' ON THE EXISTING LATTICE TOWER 0e, VICINITY EMAP $6 RANCHO R DUSTY LN STABLE LN WILSON LANDING RD r GOLD FlNCH SITE TRUE NORTH DRIVING DIRECTIONS FROM: 140,E INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE, TAKE HWY 99 NORTH AND LEFT ON ESPLANADE. APPROVALS 'LANDLORD 1EASING 'R.F. ZONING ,,CONSTRUCTION jA&E TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS P.C. 9100 Centre Pointe Dr. Ste. 100 West Chester, OH 45069 Phone: (513) 942-9530 Fax: (513) 942-9531 LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC 7925 JONES BRANCH DRIVE McLEAN, VA 22102 UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO, CA 95973 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO UBIQUITEL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PROJECT MUD-CIREEK SF03UB 322A 3902 ESPLANADE CHICO, CA 95973 PROJECT NO: 2683.SF322A DRAWN BY: FR CHECKED BY: LHF SUBMITTALS 2 07/05/00 UPDATED SHEET INDEX 1 06/29/00 UPDATED SHEET INDEX 0 06/23/00 ISSUED FOR ZONING ENGINEER SEAL �1 No. 052279 Exp./Z-3/-Oz o ►vl�- F CAS _--r--- - .._._ -- �. __._._�..____..._..... ___._.�_.�_.-._.._........ r? 1 ./1 T.... � � w �I � I _�__ .. _ _ _ _ EXISTING TELCO VAULT SITE PUN BASED ON SURVEY BY ADVANCE DESIGN CONSULTANT, LLC. DATED 6/14/00, AND FIELD MEASUREMENTS BY TECTONIC ENGINEERING iI w af 0 I 8" -3 COAXIA Z -2j SCALE: NTS 12" WIDE GALV MICROFLECT 8501 3/E"/ THREADED ROD W/ NUTS & OVERSIZED WASHERS P1001 UNISTRUT CABLE SUPPORT 04'-0" OC MAX MICROFLECT 81190 HALFSTRAP W/ UNISTRUT 1/4"/x3/4" HEX HEAD CAP SCREW k 1/4"* SPRING NUT COAXIAL CABLE W/ ANDREW STAINLESS STEEL CABLE HANGER ABLE SUPPORT FUTURE GROWTH CABINETS PROPOSED POWER CABINET FUTURE BATTERY - CABINET 5 PROPOSED 9'-6"X18'-6" CONCRETE Z-2 EQUIPMENT PAD do LEASE AREA SEE DETAIL PROPOSED GPS MOUNTED TO PPC. PROPOSED POWER PROTECTION E,��S,r/NC cABINEr. gCcESs EXISTING GATE I EXISTING FEMCE « « EXISTING 20'X10' EXISTING 12" ` EQUIPMENT SHELTER DROP INLET « -j I O « o , PROPOSED ICE « BRIDGE SEE DETAILS I'-4 « 3 4 « I « EXISTING CABLE L — J I TRAY 16'-0" I EXISTING 90' 1 ---LATTICE TOWER ' PROPOSED ANTENNAS i s EXISTING GRAVEL 0 SURFACE « I in EXISTING FEMCE 2 Q PROPOSED GRAVEL SURFACING IN DISTURBED AREAS ONLY, SEE DETAIL FUTURE AIRTOUCH 10'-6" x 10'-0" 6 EQUIPMENT PAD & LEASE AREA Z-2 SITE PLAN Z-2 SCALE: 1 "=10' BOLT B501/B502 TO L3x3 HORIZONTAL 1'-4" L3x3X1/4x2'-8" LGA WELD FRAME / 3/16 V I 1/2-0 ANGLE I SEE I THRU—BOLT DETAIL L2x2x1/4 13/Z-2 I W/5/8"0 HOLES FOR I COAXIALCABLE I I SUPPORT I 1/2"0 COPE ANGLE I DETAIL I THRU—BOLT ro W L 2"4 PIPE z m w L i LJ M 8 "0 t"4NICE BRIDGE DETAIL Z-2 SCALE: NTS (� OF PROPOSED EXISTING NEXTEL ANTENNA EXISTING LIGHTNING ROD ■ FUTURE AIRTOUCH ANTENNA 1 ' 4J-- T/TOWER 12" 1" 1. 1. 6" 6" 5 EQUIPMENT PAD PLAN Z-2 SCALE: NTS 2 ELEVATION �-2SCALE: NTS 3/4" CRUSHED STOINE ASTM C33 SIZE NO.. 57 WEED BARRIER TYPAR LANDSCAPE FABRIC OR EQUAL COMPACTED !SUBGRADE --/ \ i,l:)Mx/C'I C`i InreniPLir% r.f--r- SCALE: NTS A TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSUL TANTS P.C. 9100 Centre Pointe Dr. Ste. 100 West Chester, OH 45069 Phone: (513) 942-9530 Fax: (513) 942-9531cc LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC 7925 JONES BRANCH DRIVE McLEAN, VA 22102 UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO, CA 95973 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO UBIQUITEL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PROJECT MUD CREEK SF030322A 3902 ESPLANADE CHICO, CA 95973 FROJECTNO: 2683.SF322A [DRAWN BY: FR CHECKED BY. LHF SUBMITTALS lO2 do 07/05/00 REVISED EQUIP. ADDED ICE BRG 1 06/29/00 REVISED EQUIP. do TOWER 06/23/00 1 ISSUED FOR ZONING ENGINEER SEAL i SHEET TITLE ELEVATIONS SITE PLAN & DETAILS SHEET NUMBER Z-2