Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMUP 01-06P 298037 909 Receipt -for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage ,uvided' UNITEDSTiTES Do not -use for,International •Mail POST4l SE,NC•E (See Reverse)... Sent'to Street and No. _ W P.O., State and ZIP Code 0 Z p j n -i Postage D -0 m M Certified Fee C -11v m m D Special Delivery Fee W Z CD n Z Restricted Delivery Fee• m nn. Return Receipt Showing C G) CD to Whom &Date Delivered ar Return Receipt Showing to V. M C Date, and Addressee's AddrE D D TOTAL Postage - C & Fees , 00 Postmark or Date E o N CL PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE #: MUP 01-06 PROJECT TYPE: Minor Use Permit APPLICANT: Ubiquitel Leasing Company ADDRESS: 140 Independence Circle, Suite A, Chico, CA 95927 OWNER: Spectrasite Communications, Inc. ADDRESS: 100 Regency Forest Drive, Suite 400, Cary, N.C. 27511 REPRESENTATIVE: Temonic KEngineering Consultans P.C. ADDRESS: 9100 Centre Pointe Drive,Suite 100, West Chester, Ohio 45069 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Minor Use Permit to allow six 3 square foot panel antennas to be mounted at the 60 foot height on an e-isting 90 foot tall tower, and three small equipment cabinets PROPERTY ZONED: C-2 (General Commercial) AP#: AP # 006-400-056 LOCATED: On the east side of Esplanade, approximately 900'feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Es In ande, Chico CA, TOWN/AREA: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: 1. Application complete: Amount: 350.00 Receipt #: 18549 2. Comments sent to: 3. Comments received from: 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 6. Assigned To: Stephen Betts 7. Environmental Determination: 8. Staff Report: 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. State Clearinghouse No: Subject to Fish & Game: Project Video: Categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. -CEQA # 15061.(bx3) Other Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: Publication Notice Written: Display Ad Prepared: Notices Mailed: ;2 Number of Notices: ! ` Newspaper Publication Date: Nn / r / p r= R Planning Commission Heartng(s):. Action taken: Special Conditions: Commission Resolution No Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: Type Minor Use Permit/Send for signature: N.O.E. / N.O.D. / APPENDIX G: Fish & Game Fees Paid: Yes No Send validated Minor Use Permit: Assessor's Memo: Copy of Minor Use Permit / Variance to Planning Technician: UbiquiTel Leasing Company, (Item determined to be categorically exempt from environrr_ental review), Minor Use Permit to colocate six 3 square foot panel antennas centered at the 6C foot height on an existing 90 foot tall tower, and three 6.25 square foot equipment cabinets. The prooerty is located on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 1,000 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico. APN 006-400-056 (SB) (MUP #01-06) Find that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15311. Section 15311 consists of construction of minor structures accessory (appurtenant) to existing commercial facilities. Antennas colocated on an existing tower are considered to be accessory structures. II. Approve a Minor Use Permit 01-06 for UbiquiTel Leasing Company, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit A and subject to the following findings: A. That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the Site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards ofthe County because: Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building Division, the Butte County Environmental Hea!th Department, and the Butte County Air Quality Management District. The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Buite County General Plan because the project site is designated Commercial and is zoned C-2. The Commercial land use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. The C-2 zone allows colocation of communication facilities with approval of a Miner Use Permit. B. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will he compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas will not increase the height of the existing tower o-- extend _extend beyond the existing antennas. 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property and no. additional services or utilities are required. 3. - The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 ■ The project site is already developed with a 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The proposed antennas to be mounted on the existing tower will not ha-ve a harmful effect upon the neighborhood character. The radio-frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very little vehicle traffic will be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment shelter. The communications facility is unmanned and only one to two site visits per month will be required after construction. 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed: The site is ideally suited for the project because the proposed antennas will be mounted on the existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The project will not have an impact to any agricultural operations. 6. • Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use will ca-zse any other relevant impact. C. Based on the 'above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. D. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Chapter d4, Section 262, of the Butte County Code. Conditions of Approval: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height they will -:)e located. 2. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height w_ll withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. 3. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 MINUTES 0 SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 ■ 4. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health.. 5. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 6. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 7. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 8. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by .he controlling agency. 9. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 10. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall -:)e jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall po3t a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined.to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficier_t grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. Th-- applicant hrapplicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reac-i his/her conclusion. 11. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered) abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisancesy requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES 0 SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 ■ days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed.and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or :and owner's joint and several expense. 12. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, inclucing landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 13. The Facility may not encroach, into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 14. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner./operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the Courty. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 15. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 16. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 17. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and fie conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning. Division, is identified as "Exhibit E" and date-stamped July 17, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 18. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division -for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 19. Applicant must, also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances ar_.d regulations. 20. Building permits required for antennas and equipment cabinets: Engineer design calculations are required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings when additional antennas are installed. 21. Prior to storage of fuel or other hazardous materials at the facility submit a Hazardous Material3 Release Response Plan or complete a Hazardous Materials and Emissions Questionnaire, and submit to Environmental Health. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 ■ r • �. s It was moved by Commissioner Lambert, seconed by Commissioner Mooney,_ and unanimously carried to approve Item A, B, C, and D on the Consent Agenda. t M ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 ■ UbiquiTel Leasing Company, (Item determined to- be categorically exempt from environmental review), Minor Use Permit to colocate six 3 square foot panel antennas centered at the 60 foot height on an existing 90 foot tall tower, and three 6.25 square foot equipment cabinets. The property is located on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 1,000 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico. APN 006-400-056 (SB) (MUP #01-06) Mr. Betts gave a brief summary of the project. Mr. Wilson asked if there was a report on the cumulative radio emissions from the tower? The hearing was opened to the public. Steve Ruppenthal said that the report includes the existing antennas and the proposed antennas and fall within the FCC limits. Mr. Betts said that the report takes in the existing antennas, the recently approved antennas that are on tomorrow's Planning Commission Agenda, and this proposed antennas, and all are well within the FCC standards required. Messeret Yilma'said she was concerned about the bond required on Condition 10. Mr. Wilson explained the background of how this ordinance was developed and how this condition became a requirement of the Wireless Communication Ordinance for the County. He said there were neighborhood concerns discussed in length at the Wireless hearings. Carl Schaefer asked if the bond was for one test only in the future? Mr. Wilson said yes. He explained that the neighbor groups were concerned with radiation output. He said the Board wants to make sure these operate at a safe level. Ms. Yilma asked how they will divide the cost of doing the test where there are other carriers on the tower? Mr. Wilson said the County will look at the fact that they have allowed more antennas and allocate the cost between the colocators. He said the concern is for public safety. Mr. Schaefer asked if the test would be done at the request of the public? Mr. Wilson said it will be the County's decision when to do the test. Ms. Yilma asked on Condition 14, if the test would be done by themselves or with the other carriers every year? Mr. Wilson said the test can be done in conjunction with the other carriers.. He explained the conditions and stated that it was also a requirement of the Ordinance. Mr. Schaefer asked if the document required under Condition 14 could be signed by an engineer. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 ■ PAGE 3 ■ a to Mr. Betts said it must be signed by someone who is qualified to sign. He explained if the bond is not used, it will be returned when the antennas�are removed. Mr. Ruppenthal asked about the painting of the antennas? There was a discussion on whether or not to paint the antennas two colors if they are placed on the line between the white and red. Mr. Betts said when the time comes, Mr. Ruppenthal should contact the office and they will decide at that time. The hearing was closed. Mr. Wilson concurred with staff's recommendation to recommend to the Planning Commission that the Minor Use Permit for UbiquiTel Leasing Company, MUP 01-06, be approved subject to the findings and conditions listed below: Staff recommends that the Planning Manager take the following actions: I. Recommend that the Planning Commission find that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15311. Section 15311 consists of construction of minor structures accessory (appurtenant) to existing commercial facilities. Antennas colocated on an existing tower are considered to be accessory structures. II. Recommend approval to the Planning Commission of Minor Use Pen riit 01-06 for UbiquiTel Leasing Company, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit A and subject to the following findings: A. That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose' of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building Division, the Butte County Environmental Health Department, and the Butte County Air Quality Management District. The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Commercial. and is zoned C-2. The Commercial land use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. The C-2 zone allows colocation of communication facilities with approval of a Minor Use Permit. B. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas will not increase the height of the existing tower or extend beyond the existing antennas. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 ■ PAGE 4 ■ 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property and no additional services or utilities are required. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The project site is already developed with a 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The proposed antennas to be mounted on the existing tower will not have a harmful effect upon the neighborhood character. The radio- frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very little vehicle traffic will be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment shelter. The communications facility is unmanned and only one to two site visits per month will be required after construction. 5. 'The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed: The site is ideally suited for the project because the proposed antennas will be mounted on the existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The project will not have an impact to any agricultural operations. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: -The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use will cause any other relevant impact. C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. D. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Chapter 24, Section 262, of the Butte County Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height they will be located. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 ■ PAGE 5 ■ a go 2. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. 3. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 4. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 6. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 7. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes 8. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 10. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. 1n no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC. standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING 0 MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 ■ PAGE 6 ■ 11. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 12. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate, landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 13. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 14. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of - or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety .standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 15. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 16. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 17. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit E" and date-stamped July 17, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 18. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 19. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. 20. Building permits required for antennas and equipment cabinets. Engineer design calculations are required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings when additional antennas are installed. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 ■ PAGE 7 ■ 21. Prior to storage of fuel'or other hazardous materials at the facility submit a Hazardous Materials Release Response Plan or complete a Hazardous Materials and Emissions Questionnaire, and submit to Environmental Health. Mr. Wilson noted for the record that there was no public present at this hearing and no correspondence was received. He explained the procedure of sending this item to the Planning Commission and the appeal process. G ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 ■ PAGE 8 ■ j L L t -t r ". Srti2RG.� DEPARTM 'vT OF DEVELOPM NT SERVICES Gay*,r3 BUTTMCO LINTY UNIFORL'VI APP�tCATI N APPLICANT: Ment information to be provided is on other side: O APPLICANT'S NAME ( Uapplicant is different from owner an affidavit is requited) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUM3ER: 013-T o uT-Tu— �7-nS - N Cn Mp riTV O () 6 _ 9 G C) - G S4� ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFTCj uSc) '"f) ��o� c't,����c� CZK' SUZTI EN C(a(Q CA Mop - o(A NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT( Uany) TELEPHONE PORT -A- s1r0P,tin �- E (s3o) Bcja - Soo LOCATION OF PROJECT( ?Major cross streets and Address, if any ) � � a L' URDU. r H --T- w r -P q S 9-4 GEivFI~AT TN(F(1R�f4TT(INTRF(1rfTUCn OWNER'S NAME TENTATIVE SUBD[VIS[ON 4tAP ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TELEPHONE rRv-i 0 L Nac SSP{ -«Os BOUNDARY LEVE NIOD FICATION (6116)$G4-a�� I ADDRESS: BUTTE COUNTY❑ CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: PLAN►\TTNTr. TWITTWnJ 10( a sl -b u E u RI -Le CDup_-r C HT c3 ce ZONE GENER.aL PLr N EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE (in Square Fee( or Acr:s ) C- 9% �rnE2C_j . � GE C7-1- i✓s'T 6 .S X 51.5 = EX[STING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) "'U PROPOSED sT Ruc-CURES (in Squ_ra Feet) 'SQL menn GNT Gf'K3`LN en- — apt X (Ot = DO I 9-6 14 . S f I (Check Ona) U (Check One) p ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC NATER ❑ PROPERTY [S OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERT"i' IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ REZONE ❑ USE PERM[T AMINOR USE PERMIT ❑ VARLANCE ❑ MINOR V,ARLANCE ❑ AD:`[IN[STRATIVE PER�LI[T ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEN-IENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBD[VIS[ON 4tAP ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1PI%WAIVER RECEIVE (�.�N �� OF PARCEL NLAP O BOUNDARY LEVE NIOD FICATION JUL 2 6 2000 ❑ [.EGM_ LOT DETERMINATION BUTTE COUNTY❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER PLAN►\TTNTr. TWITTWnJ NIIN[NG AND RECr AiNrA TION PLAN ❑ OTHER rcwict,. i LGJI,ruri IuLV FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attacb necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division , describe the number a.nd size of parcels.) �0 •O F -M rT_0L L,LT-[-E L- L.U'rR E c.t✓ ss CD nlrn u [vac f�-Vzo �-J NSA -rmf,) C, 10< Shu Ec�Luzem&--NT C(G2xv PT s `F -L Fc-cTv2E �F,JIv IJs�s� 3 S�c� �S (�.�N �� �•- Fu riU G � vEc, y`�vry ISIS �-c vl S 6cf*�) R- ML A_ 13 E LO 0 Pl- 0TJ Pt" rfrlan1 IJ 0 �1`t1,:-(L Of ' e OWNER CERTLFICATlON I C'ERTIF`f Ti[AT [ AM PRESENTLY Ti(E LEGAL OWNTER OR TT(E AUTHORIZED AGENT' OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FL'RT"HER. I ACKNOWLEDGE ME FILING OF TI -IIS APPLICATION A`D CER -n Y T \T ALL OFr \�OVE�FOR�Ir\T(O\ (S TRUE r\`D ACCURATE. ((fan agent is to be authorized, execute an airidavit of luthocitation and; �ia j Ia�t FO - DATE: 7114/ 169d SIGNATURE: 06/28/2000 09:59 53089750_07 LCC CHICO PAGE 03 AGENT AUTHORIZA,T.ION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; U 6-LGU3-�(- L-c--r-)Sav,�c- (.nmPetr,) y 5-66 CA 50a S Print Name of Agent and Ptione Number l�tfl -To OEPC-t.,nCv c CLc *� C(CLu� CA 9 5°� Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for (y-aQo (Z USE on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number 00(0moo-- 06L This authorization allows reoresentatiora for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. a -rid to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) RECEI V RD VA,ut-J L JUL 2 6 2000 Print Name Print Name(� -,� �P,� BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION signature signature Architect and/or Engineer: -MQI) jTG ENG==N1✓Er,?-Tti G (jp05UC--TT vTS Print Name of Architeet/Engitiear aad Phone Number `'[[00 Cru ra F pt) rc ► TF V R -STF,. tom ( UJEEs-r CRlflp H `+SD6n Making Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: / Date Received: 1 q1 oo Total Amount Received: --SS0.00 L/- AP Number(s) ---tLJA— Legal Description ✓ Owners Authorization ✓ Zoning Requirements t� Project Description ✓ Copies of plot plan Taken by 1) �) Receipt No. I -S -S -L-4-5 E.H. LD Plan JSjb. 00 FD Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. -3 Sc), o0 tg\kr,Qr vs, Ptah;-} Current fee for this application is $ �1oy4.oQ Jic Pt��ns of G/1 q.166 Make. check payable to "Butte County Treasurer", COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) / ,� 1 Date Filed 21 (O 1 V" General Information: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or project sponsor: 2. Address of project: '59"()'C,1 �-h N J r= •'-�� " �h =i -a Assessor's Parcel Number: CSO b _Lto0 - CJ 51Y 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: 'ST -&V F o TN c- P _ iJ�ry CG CZRC.LE� S fAzT'e F1 CFl2 Q l(A GS 91�3 5,60- 9-�- 500.5 4. list and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: (Yu►JO R USG PERn'1- >I ilialJT-t_CT--f-3 G PC—tzmz`i fps RCOUT-RGo (3flu Cout�r�. 5. E6dsting general plan designation: rot'Y1M E2 CZ19 1, 6. Existing zoning district: 7. How island currently used 5 R 5 MR-Jq-G G R-C—'T� i 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): - W f9`r-O C) �T X 9CS Ret...ftTl&o O ns e 'PrN Ex�s'�UG- `fE�-�C.oi� uN�Crocts F�t,�Ty . Project Description: 9. Site size: 2 X t a1 (Acres/Sq. Feet) �tp 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: Compact: Total: P44 11. Plans attached YesZ No 12. Proposed development schedule �(�P t2 01C� M (�`�V 6- S 13. Associated projects 1\1010 15 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development 0l/N Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size .expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of saes area and loading facilities. CZTI/ 0(ZTEkJT'�7D S /bP'ft -6— 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. L) �a ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ::: 1 18. If institutional, Indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loeding facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. iJ�a 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application Is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as :1"'R -x -S ggLa cT R EQUMREs �-tio2 U S E P E-kcna-V ('F'P�G9-( ou •`'rte's. (�ppczcra� =s c—r� �Ec�usc u� cA_�oc,r�-rzty oto �w ExzS� N G- -n✓ c,Eco mrnU Ns.c�o►J5 Toru ty2' Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. — 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. -- — 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. _ 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. — %C 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. — k 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality x or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. — — 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. — 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. — 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. — — 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). — 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). — — 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. t E c�c� o 0 + s P (�T d t= > � v E r-WPL-M A-' 0 -�.zs Fl -P P �, SCA6rnr-�NC- TO CO-L'oui� ori eAXS-rzcv� R5) -Ca ZLTiES tJ u cc u oil' Cl Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division J 2 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description') 32. Describe the project site as it wsts before the project, including information on topography, soil stability plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the Efte and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be acceFted. 5,&e (�Ir�K C --O 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. In6cate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Mrc H C—C) Certification I hereby certify that the statements fumished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presen.ed.are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signatur or /10/ 0 /2 71X'e� K:\FORNiS\SU8MITTAL\ENV-INFO rJ BUtte County Department of Development Services D Planning Division 3 COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Attach description of project containing the following information: Environmental Setting: 32. Describe the project as it exists before the project, including information of topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. RESONSE The property is currently used as a storage facility. There is a telecommunications tower on the property, which is used to co -locate antennas. We will not be disturbing the soil at the site. There are no observed cultural, historical, or scenic aspects to the property. A fence surrounds the property and no animals have been observed. Attached is a Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Robert Young & Associates. The report was prepared in 1997 for the original construction of the tower. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. RESPONSE The property is located on 3902 Esplanade, in Chico. There are no observed cultural, historical, or scenic aspects to the property. The land use of the surrounding properties is industrial. K:\Planning\1 Front Counter\1 inbox\LABELS\MUP 01-06.doc Tecnonic K Engineering 9100 Centre Pointe Dr Ste 100 West Chester OH 45069 Ubiquitel Leasing Co 140 Independence Cir Ste A Chico CA 95927 006400056000 STEPHENS DAVID L & NELL 3902 ESPLANADE CHICO CA 95973 Spectrasite Communications Inc 100 Regency Forest Dr Ste 4C0 . Cary NC 27511 006400020000 MACHHOUR YOUSEF 3990 ESPLANADE CHICO CA 95973 006400023000 006400021000 BETTENCOURT THOMAS A & 006400025000 HAMRE LEE DARLEEN A SUNSET HILLS GOLF COURSE INC 3930 ESPLANADE 3544 BRIDLE LN 13301 GARNER LN CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95973 006400032000 006400033000 006400034000 HERMAN DIANNA K * LAFORCE JAMES W & DONA K JT EVANS BRENDA T 4310 OCEAN DR 1552 WINKLE DR 4275 OCEAN DR. CHICO CA 95926 CHICO CA 95926-7789 CHICO CA 95973 006400039000 BONAKDAR MOHAMMAD 19001 GLENMONT IRVINE CA 92615 007420007000 SCHROEDER THYRA K & NIELSEN STANLEY A TRS 18 ADAIR CT DANVILLE CA 94526 006400059000 MCDONALD W E TRUSTEE 13407 GARNER LN CHICO CA 95973 5 007420018000 ALBERT MAX L & ALICE MARLENE 146 TONEA WEST CHICO CA 95973 007550043000 007550045000 HARROD JEFFREY S LAY KATHY 13441 OAK RANCH LN P O BOX 6444 CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95927 007420006000 PEACHER ROBERT R & NICKIE L 3107 HWY 99 CHICO CA 95973 007420062000 PLEASANT VALLEY BAPT-ST CHURCH OF CHICO 13539 GARNER LANE CHICO CA 95973-9259 Po D 6 - DO C)0 6- O 1 (3 -, I d A S IlLOO -X10 - Oto III ;p2 r�Grr19NCIO v c SQN36-1 N�Lti.S lO b,33 D3� ; • O�Q ��CDC?N�C�17 /� DG) 7 s q I'D CP -7 SS0 L-1 Oy I iii i�� i�� iu iit ul iu iii iu iii iii iii iii iii iii — - ___�_ io i�� ��� ��� u� III III --- III III --- - -- III. u� BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING MANAGER AGENDA REPORT - September 13, 2000 Applicant: UbiquiTel Leasing Company of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico File #: MUP 01-06 Parcel Size: 4.8 acres Request: Minor Use Permit to colocate six 3 square. foot panel Zone date: March 28, 1995 antennas centered at the 60 foot height on an existing 90 Project foot tall tower; and three 6.25 Planner: Stephen Betts square foot equipment cabinets. Supervisor District: 3 G.P.: Commercial Attachments: Zoning: C-2 (General Commercial) A. Conditions of Approval B. Vicinity Map APN. 006-400-056 C. General Plan/Zoning Map D. Photosimulation Location: On the east side of Esplanade, E: Site Plan approximately 1,000 feet south STAFF COMMENT: Staff recommends approval of the Minor Use Permit with conditions and findings. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: This project will allow for the installation of six 3 square foot panel antennas centered at the 60 -foot level on an existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower. Each panel antenna is approximately 3 square feet (8 inches wide x 56 inches high) in size. Three 6.25 square foot equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower. The proposed panel antennas will provide digital wireless communications (cellular phone service) for the Highway 99 corridor north of Chico. The existing communication facility is unmanned, and does not require a water source or a sewage disposal system. One to two visits to the site will be made per month by company technicians to perform preventive maintenance. Access to the site is from Esplanade via an existing driveway and access road. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE i ■ 11 The project site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Commercial. Surrounding parcels range in size from 3.2 to 91 acres. Land uses on surrounding parcels include agricultural land on the west side of Esplanade, commercial and light industrial uses to the north and south, and Highway 99 to the east. The project site is 4.84 acres in size and is developed with a business that refurbishes and sells large modular storage units, a dwelling unit, the 90 -foot tall lattice tower, and a 200 square foot communication equipment shelter. The existing tower and equipment shelter are located in a 2,500 square foot lease area that is surrounded by a six-foot high chain link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire. A locked gate provides access into the lease area. The tower is painted alternating red and white stripes, and a blinking red light is locat6d on the top of the tower. The existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower was permitted with Use Permit 98-04 and supports three vertical antennas mounted on the top. The Planning Manager recently recommended approval of Minor Use Permit 00-15 to colocate three flush -mounted panel antennas at the 80 -foot level on the tower, but the Planning Commission has not affirmed that recommendation as of the writing of this report. ANALYSIS: General Plan and Zoning: The project site is designated as Commercial by the Land Use Element Map of the General Plan, which allows public uses as secondary uses (note: cellular phone service providers are considered a public utility). Section 24-146 of Butte County Code states that wireless communication facilities are not permitted in the C-2 zone unless a Minor Use Permit is obtained, subject to the requirements of Butte County Code Section 24-262. The Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance (Butte County Code Section 24-262) allows colocation on existing facilities in the.0-2 zone with approval of a Minor Use Permit, subject to numerous requirements. The project has been conditioned to meet the requirements of Section 24- 262, including: • Submittal of bonds to cover the costs of a one-time radio-frequency analysis. • Radio-frequency emissions in excess of FCC standards are not allowed. • Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered to be abandoned. • Verification submitted annually attesting that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The additional antennas mounted on the tower will not create an aesthetic impact. The antennas will not increase the height of the tower nor will the additional antennas extend beyond the existing antennas. A photosimulation of the proposed antennas on the existing tower shows that the antennas will not be highly conspicuous. A condition of the project requires that the proposed antennas be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height where they will be installed. The Minor Use Permit to allow three flush -mounted panel antennas on the tower recently recommended for ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 2 ■ approval to the Planning Commission by the Planning Manager did not generate any negative public comments. The radio emissions from the proposed antennas are regulated by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). A radio-frequency analysis written by a registered radio-frequency engineer indicates that the radio emissions from the tower, including the existing 'and proposed antennas, will be well within FCC standards for cellular phone facilities for publicly accessible areas near the tower. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Manager take the following actions: I. Recommend that the Planning Commission find that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15311. Section 15311 consists of construction of minor structures accessory (appurtenant) to existing commercial facilities. Antennas colocated on an existing tower are considered to be accessory structures. II. Recommend approval to the Planning Commission of Minor Use Permit 01-06 for UbiquiTel Leasing Company, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit A and subject to the following findings: A. That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building_ Division, the Butte County. Environmental Health Department, and the Butte County Air Quality Management District. The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Commercial and is zoned C-2. The Commercial land use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. The C-2 zone allows colocation of communication facilities with approval of a Minor Use Permit. B. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 3 ■ 1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas will not increase the height of the existing tower or extend beyond the existing antennas. 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property and no additional services or utilities are required. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The project site is already developed with.a 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The proposed antennas to be mounted on the existing tower will not have a harmful effect upon the neighborhood character. The radio- frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very little vehicle traffic will be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment shelter. The communications facility is unmanned and only one to two site visits per month will be required after construction. 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed: The site is ideally suited for the project because the proposed antennas will be mounted ori the existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The project will not have an impact to any agricultural operations. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use will cause any other relevant impact. I C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 4 ■ D. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Chapter 24, Section 262, of the Butte County Code. K:\PROJECTS\UPM\UBIQUMNORTHESP\NORTHESP.RPT ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 5 ■ EXHIBIT A MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) MUP 01-06 PERMIT NO. 006-400-056 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: UbiquiTel Leasing Company is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with application filed: Minor Use Permit to install six 3 square foot (8 inches wide x 56 inches high) panel antennas at the 60 -foot level on an existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower, and to install three 6.25 square foot equipment cabinets. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 12 months of the date of approval. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of approval, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. A Minor Use Permit subject to lapse may be renewed for an additional period of up to one year, provided that sixty (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date, an application for renewal of the Minor Use Permit is filed with the Planning Division on the prescribed form and accompanied by the necessary data and fees. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 6 ■ 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke .a permit. Conditions of Approval: Planning Division: 1. The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height they will be located. 2. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. 3. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 4. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. 5. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 6. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather. access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 7. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 8. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County, and, any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 7 ■ 10. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which. may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 11. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 12. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 13. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 14. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall. conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 15. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 8 0 16. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 17. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit E" and date-stamped July 17, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 18. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 19. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. Building Division: 20. Building permits required for antennas and equipment cabinets. Engineer design calculations are required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings when additional antennas are installed. Environmental Health Division: 21. Prior to storage of fuel or other hazardous materials at the facility submit a Hazardous Materials Release Response Plan or complete a Hazardous Materials and Emissions Questionnaire, and submit to Environmental Health. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 9 0 0 0 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: _ Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 X County Clerk County of Butte 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Project Title: MUP 01-06, Minor Use Permit Assessor's Parcel No.: AP # 006-400-056 FROM: Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Applicant: Ubiquitel Leasing Company, 140 Independence Circle, Suite A, Chico, CA 95927 CO. CLERK Project Location -Specific: On the east side of Esplanade, approx. 900 feet south of Hwy 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chfto, CA. Project Location -City: Chico Project Location -County: Butte Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: Minor Use Permit to allow six 3 square foot panel antenras to be mounted at the 60 foot height on an existing 90 foot tall tower, and three small equipment cabinets Name of Person or Agency Approving Project: Butte County Planning Commission Exempt Status: (Check (One) Ministerial (Sec. 15073) Declared Emergency (Sec. 15071(a)) . Emergency Project (Sec. 15071 (b) and (c)) X Categorical Exemption. State type ark section number: 15311 Reasons why project is exempt: Placement of seasonal or temporary use items such as lifeguard towers, mobile food units, portable restrooms, or similar items in generally the same locations from time to time in publicly owned parks, stadiums, or other facilities designed for public use. Contact Person: Stephen Betts If filed by applicant: Telephone: (530) 538-7601 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Date Received For Filing: ignature, Ra y Wilson Principal Pla er K:\PLANNING\PROJECTS\UPM\UBIQUIT\NORTHESP\NOE&FEES. WPD e CDECLARATION OF FEES alifornia Fish and Game Code Seclt*11.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Ubiquitel Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A Chico, CA 95927 FILING NO. Project Title/file number: Minor Use Permit/MUP 01-06 CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION (X) A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED O A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. Environmental Impct Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. () OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT / NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). 2. () NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: Randy Wilson Title: Principal Planner Lead. Agency: Butte County Department of Date: t TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WJH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. K:\PLANNING\PROJECTS\UPM\UBIQUIT\NORTHESP\NOE&FEES. WPD C 0 R P 0 R A T 1 0 N 1 271 North Avenue, Suite 711 ~ ' P.O. Box 1620, New Rochelle. NY 10802.1620 Phone: 914- 576-6530 S Fax: 914-576-0576 INETK3 C O. R P O R A, T 1 O N ' ENGINEERING REPORT SUMMARY JUNE 20, 2000 THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED AND SIGNED BY LOUIS G. RNACCHIA, BEE, PRESIDENT EVALUATION OF RADIO EMISSIONS FROM THE PROPOSED UBIQUITEL, LLC, PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE (PCS) ANTENNA ' INSTALLATION (SITE #SF03UB322A) FOR A INTEGRATED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, TO BE MOUNTED TO AN EXISTING LATTICE TOWER (SPECTRASITE), LOCATED 'ON APN ' #006-400-056, 3902 ESPLANADE RD., CHICO, CALIFORNIA. 1 n I L 271 North Avenue, Suite 711 P.O. Box 1620, New Rochelle, NY 10802.1620 Phone: 914-576-6530 • O Fax: 914-576-0576 INETKS. C O R P O R A T 1 O N Mr. Ed Frawley, Program Manager Ubiquitel, LLC 1175 West Moana Lane, Suite 201, Reno, NV 89509 Subject: Evaluation of Radio Emissions from a proposed ' Ubiquitel, LLC, Personal Communications Service (PCS) Antenna Installation (Site #SF03UB322A) for ' a Integrated Wireless Communications Network, to be mounted to an existing Lattice Tower, located on APN #006-400-056, 3902 Esplanade Rd., Chico, ' California. Attn.: Ed Frawley . As per the applicant's 'request, Ubiquitlel, enclosed please find: ' A. An analysis of findings and conclusions prepared by SCINETICS Corporation, Staff Engineers on the following: ' 1. Power Density of the combined field at the point where it is at it's maximum strength and concurrently at the closest point to ' the source, Ubiquitlel, LLC, Personal Communications Service (PCS) Antenna Installation and at radial distances of ' 10, 100, 500, 1000 and 2000 feet from the PCS - Transmitting Antenna, where people can ' be. ' 2. Calculated levels compared to allowable EMF continuous Exposure levels as per ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992/NCRP, 'Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Continuous Exposure Standards, OSHA. 1 SUMMARY This report is the result of an extensive study of Electromagnetic Field Intensities (EMF - Power Densities) emitted by the Proposed Ubiquitlel, LLC, PCS Antenna Installation, (Site #SF03UB322A) for a Integrated Wireless Communications Network, to be mounted to an existing Lattice Tower, located on APN #006-400-056, 3902 Esplanade Rd., Chico, California. The study incorporated the most conservative considerations to determine practical combined worst case Power Densities contributed by the proposed Ubiquitlel,. LLC antennas, as well as the existing Nextel and proposed Pacbell antennas, the Chico community could encounter. CONCLUSIONS The Power Densities emitted by the proposed PCS Radio Antenna Facility are many orders of magnitude below the Health Standards adopted or proposed in the United States and any Health Standard used anywhere in the world. The issue of EMF compliance is pre-empted from the municipality regulatory powers beyond the applicants stating that it has examined the emissions in accordance with "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97- 01, August 1997" and that the applicant is in compliance with the newly adopted FCC MPE/NCRP of 1000 microwatts/cm. sq. residential or "uncontrolled environment" Standard. ' Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 states that; ' No State or local government or instrumentality thereof, may regulate the - placement, construction and modification of personal wireless services facilities on the basis of environmental effects of radio frequencies emissions to the extent that such Facilities complies as to the Commissions (FCC) Regulations concerning such emissions". The results of this theoretical worst case safety analysis clearly indicate that the EMF levels attributed to the emissions caused by 1 the proposed PCS Facility, will be far below EMF continuos Exposure levels as per ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991* (49 CFR 1.1310), Federal _Communications Commission (FCC Continuous Exposure Standards, ' OSHA, and 1986 NCRP Recommendations. The emissions broadcast from the Ubiquitel, LLC transmitters are in the non -ionizing 1950- 1965 Mhz frequency band, a band previously assigned to 11 C FIXED/MOBILE communications. Presently the FCC has assigned ' these same frequencies in the 1950-1965 Mhz band to the PCS Industry, capable of transmitting at power levels of 200 Watts ERP. The Frequency band haS in fact been a part of the EMF environment for over forty years. The EMF levels attributed to the emissions caused by the PCS Broadcast Systems are well below applicable EMF evidence, are well below threshold effects. The derived Standards have added safety limits to the threshold levels. When EMF levels encountered are at or below the Standard, no health effects occur, therefore no cumulative effect is possible regardless of exposure duration. This analysis and the results of this analysis assumes an antenna power output of three hundred sixteen (16) Watts ERP per channel. ' The theoretical maxima of combined RF emissions, resulting from the proposed Ubiquitlel, LLC, PCS Installation, to which the public (non -occupational) is exposed to in and around normally accessible ' areas surrounding the PCS antenna installation and the Chico community, is far below the strictest continuous exposure limit ' legislated and proposed in the United States. Specifically, the theoretical maximum levels of RF energy (see Table II) resulting from the simultaneous and continuous operation of all combined ' Ubiquitlel LLC, PCS Radio Facility transmitting antennas are less than one ( l) microwatt/cm, sq.. The EMF levels are hundreds and thousands of times below the Maximum Permitted Exposure limits ' (MPE) proposed by 1982 ANSI, 1992 ANSI/IEEE, NCRP and the MPE criteria of all states that regulate Radio Frequency Installations and meets the safety criteria specified by the FCC in accordance with the ' Telecommunications Act of 1996. ' The theoretical highest combined ** emissions from all proposed and existing herein named carri rS the community could be exposed to at an elevation of 16 feet above ground, at a radial distance of 500 feet - Combined EMF = 0.336%. a total far below the permitted 1 100.0% allowed by a factor of 290. _(See Table IIA -1) (Note: Future co -locating carriers must complete an FCC Compliance ' analysis, including the proposed carrier Emissions as determined herein, [if this application is approved], showing cumulative EMF ' emissions impact.) 1E ' These EMF levels and all other levelsen re p s ted in Table II, IIA, and IIB are theoretical maximas that could occur only under worst case events, assuming conditions such as in phase reflections occurring steady state, all transmitters operating simultaneously and continuously and excluding resistance or attenuating characteristics ' of construction material used in homes, schools and other similar structures. In reality,* actual field measurements continually provide readings of power density levels far lower than the more conservative analytical levels indicated. The Telecommunications act of 1996, is the applicable Federal Law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of PCS Radio facilities. It is the conclusion of ' this report, that the proposed Ubiquitlel L.P. PCS application meets the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) present criteria and ' the FCC criteria as it is effected by the Telecommunications act of 1996, with respect to environmental considerations of RF emissions. Furthermore, Mobile PCS Radio Frequency Bands do not interfere with television reception, telephones or radio reception due to the wide separation of the Broadcast Bands ' as mandated and monitored by the FCC. (See Table I) ANALYSIS This critical analysis* incorporated PCS Radio antenna emission characteristics and included the following assumptions which exceed realistic conditions of operations, but will yield worst case EMF - Power Densities ordinarily not realized and never exceeded. ' 1. All antennas are located at the lowest elevation indicated in the construction drawing to absorb errors in actual locations and to bring the antenna cluster closer to facilities and citizens than would normally be the case. 2. All antennas will be transmitting continuously, 24 hours a day. 3. All channels will be communicating simultaneously. 4. Power levels emitting from the antennas are increased by a 1 factor of 4 to take into account possible in - phase reflections at any point in the community, which is rarely the case, and if so, are never continuous. ' 5. At all distances greater than 2000 feet, the Power Densities decrease by a factor of four (4) with every doubling of distance. - The PCS Installation in , question is an assembly of low power antennas that emits radio energy at levels 100 to .1000 times below those of Commercial Broadcast Antennas. Given the distances between the antennas studied in- this report and the community ' field points in question, as well as the overall community, the densities of the radio energy are extremely low. * Reference Basis for calculations: ' 1 -Evaluating Compliance With FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. OET Bulletin No. 65 -Edition 97-01 " '2- Copies of data, sketches and specifications submitted by Ubiquitlel, LLC are the basis for our studies, calculations and analysis. EMF STANDARDS REVIEW - The U.S. Congress adopted "The ' National Environmental -Policy Act of 1969" (NEPA) which required all government agencies to take into account the potential environmental impact of their actions. The agencies had to consider 1 whether their actions significantly affect the "the quality of the human environment". To implement this mandate, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted rules covering the NEPA in licensing and approving facilities and operations under its jurisdiction. Rules adopted were codified in the code of Federal Regulations, Part 1, Subpart I, of the FCC Rules and Regulations. Facilities or operations specified must provide information assessing the environmental effect of their proposal. In the case of RF radiation, the environmental effect would be the relative health risk to people living or working near or at the facility in question. The FCC was required by NEPA to make a determination as to whether the facilities or operations it approves may significantly affect the human environment with regard to the emission of RF radiation. As there was no federal standard for exposure to RF radiation, the FCC chose to rely upon a recognized non-government standard. The FCC selected the "American National Standard Safety Level With Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, "300 KiloHertz (kHz) to 100 GigaHertz (GHz)" prepared by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in 1982. The protection guides recommended by ANSI were the guidelines the FCC has identified for using in evaluating Fl E' F In 1986 the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Sub -Committee SC -53, published recommended limits for occupational and public exposure (NCRP - "Biological effects and exposure criteria for radio frequency electromagnetic fields." NCRP Report No. 86, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland). Sub -Committee SC -53 independently retained Radiation Frequency Protection Guidelines (RFPGs) similar to those of the 1982 ANSI Standard but with one notable exception: two tiers appear, one for occupational exposure and one for exposure of the general public. The results of the studies, carefully analyzed, proposed exposure levels of approximately 5000 microwatts per centimeter square (at 1950) MegaHertz (MHz) frequencies) for continuous occupational exposure and approximately 1000 microwatts per centimeter square for continuous exposure of the public sector is used in the comparative analysis herewith. In 1990, Sub -Committee IV (SC -IV of C95), formed by the IEEE using rigid selection criteria for their studies and critical reviews, recommended two tiers (NCRP) but with differences in rational. ANSI soon accepted the recommendations of IEEE Sub -Committee IV and the recommendations were proposed, adopted and termed ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 19*92. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law 104-104- February ' 8, 1996 recommended adoption of portions the ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 1991/NCRP Standards, and in August of 1996, the FCC did adopt the i environmental significance with respect to Human Exposure to RF Radiation. The FCC adopted rules which required preparation of environmental assessment if the particular facility or operation would cause i exposure of workers or the general public to levels of radio frequency radiation in excess of the ANSI protection guides. The rule i is contained in 47 CFR , 1.1307(d). That rule applied to facilities or operations licensed or authorized under the following parts of the Commission's Rules, 5,21 Subpart K), 25, 73, 74 (Subparts A, G, I, and ' L), and 80. The facilities and operations licensed or authorized under all other parts, subparts or sections of the Commissions Rules were categorically excluded from consideration. In 1986 the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Sub -Committee SC -53, published recommended limits for occupational and public exposure (NCRP - "Biological effects and exposure criteria for radio frequency electromagnetic fields." NCRP Report No. 86, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland). Sub -Committee SC -53 independently retained Radiation Frequency Protection Guidelines (RFPGs) similar to those of the 1982 ANSI Standard but with one notable exception: two tiers appear, one for occupational exposure and one for exposure of the general public. The results of the studies, carefully analyzed, proposed exposure levels of approximately 5000 microwatts per centimeter square (at 1950) MegaHertz (MHz) frequencies) for continuous occupational exposure and approximately 1000 microwatts per centimeter square for continuous exposure of the public sector is used in the comparative analysis herewith. In 1990, Sub -Committee IV (SC -IV of C95), formed by the IEEE using rigid selection criteria for their studies and critical reviews, recommended two tiers (NCRP) but with differences in rational. ANSI soon accepted the recommendations of IEEE Sub -Committee IV and the recommendations were proposed, adopted and termed ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 19*92. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law 104-104- February ' 8, 1996 recommended adoption of portions the ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 1991/NCRP Standards, and in August of 1996, the FCC did adopt the i ANSI IEEE C95.1 - 1991 two tier Standards, to be implemented on applications beginning September 1, 1997. The Power Densities emitted by the proposed PCS Radio Communications Antenna Installation base station are many orders of magnitude below the Health Standards adopted or proposed in the United States and any Health Standard used anywhere in the world. The attached photograph indicating acceptable EMF emissions from various household appliances provides a further perspective for better understanding the EMF levels encountered in this summary. For additional information addressing the environmental impact of EMF Emissions please refer to the section in the report titled "References" which provides current names of agencies, contact personnel and phone numbers. Frequency Bands - 'According to most authorities, microwave (MW) frequencies cover the approximate band from 900 MegaHertz (MHz) to 300 GigaHertz (GHz). One MegaHertz (MHz) is a million cycles and One GigaHertz (GHz) is a billion cycles per second. Table I lists several other communication and interrogation frequencies used in the United States. Clearly, a large fraction of commercial and private telecommunication involves MW Frequencies. TABLE I (Some Frequency Definitions) Type of System FM Radio VHF TV UHF TV Mobile Radio Telephone/PCS Typical Radar Systems Frequency Interval 88 MHz to 108 MHz 174 MHz to 216 MHz 470 MHz to 806 MHz 806 MHz to 2.0 GHz 200 MHz to 3.0 GHz G am 4 The Principal Features Of The Proposed Installation And The ' Assumptions Considered In The Analysis Are As Follows- a) The proposed Ubiquitlel, LLC, (PCS) radio antennas will be ' mounted to an existing Lattice Tower as indicated by the Ubiquitlel LLC drawings. The elevation from the centerline of the proposed Ubiquitlel antennas to the base of the, Lattice Tower will be ' approximately 65 feet. The closest a person can approach the transmitting antenna is 59 feet. This assumes a 6 foot tall person, with the distances being measured from the top of that person's head ' at the base of the existing Lattice Tower, to the centerline on the antenna panel in question. ' b) The antenna cluster will consist of three (3) Sectors, three (3) Directional type antennas (RV90-17-OODP) in each sector, for transmission and receive. The physical arrangement of these antennas is illustrated in drawings given by Ubiquitlel LLC (Assumed 2 degree downtilt for all antennas in this analysis.) c) The maximum number of channels that will be assigned to the antenna array, in any direction, it is assumed, will not exceed three ' (3). The power from the transmitting antennas for each of the three (3) channels in each sector, is assumed not to exceed 316 Watts, ERP. ' The ' radio transmissions could be at frequencies between 1950 and 1965 MegaHertz. Maximum power from the transmitting. Ubiquitlel LLC. (PCS) Antenna, in any direction will be 948 Watts, ERP. ' d) It was assumed that the elevation of the Chico community within a radius of 2000 feet from the PCS Antenna perimeter is ' equal to the elevation at the base of the Lattice Tower, with exceptions as noted in Table II. e) All field points are at Radial distances indicated from the base of the Lattice Tower where the vertical line of PCS Transmitting ' antenna intersects. 7 L I f) The additional EXISTING/PROPOSED Carriers co -located on the ' existing Lattice Tower including transmitting data, are as follows: NEXTEL (existin Maximum ERP/Channel 40 watts ERP Number of Channels 20 Number of Transmit/Receive Antennas/Sector 3 Antenna centerline height above grade 87 feet Antenna Model -ALP -9212 Directional -Gain= 12dBd Frequency of transmission- 850 Mhz Maximum continuous residential Exposure- 550 microwatts/cm.sq. PACBELL (ur000sed Maximum ERP/Channel 200 watts ERP Number of Channels/sector 3 Number of Sectors 3 Number of Transmit/Receive Antennas/Sector 3 Antenna centerline height above grade 75 feet Antenna Model -RV90-17-OODP Directional -Gain= 14.4dBd Frequency of transmission- 1930Mhz Maximum continuous residential Exposure- 1000 microwatts/cm.sq. J TABLE IIA -1 EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ./ PERCENTAGE OF STANDARDS PROPOSED UBIQUITEL LATTICE TOWER INSTALLATION 3902 ESPLANADE RD., CHICO, CALIFORNIA Field Point- 1 -Any point in community -(16) feet above surface Antenna System Elevation Power Standard Calculated Percent of ' Feet WERP FCC/NCRP EMF Density Standard Residential UBIOUITEL (12) -1950 MHz (Proposed) 65 316 1000 0.333 0.033 NEXTEL (3) - 850 MHz (existing) 87 40 550 1.600 0.290 PACBELL (9) -1930 MHz (Proposed) 75 200 1000 0.133 0.013 Total Percentage Of All Antenna Sources ' 0.336 0.095 NOTE: 1. kN/A is less than 0.001. 2. Unless Indicated - Total Percentage of All Antenna Sources = less than 0.01%. 3. WERP - power output per channel ** EMF emissions contributed by transmitting antennas in differing frequency bands are regulated by MPE Standards for the specific bands in which the emissions are analyzed. When adding the emissions resulting from transmissions in differing frequency bands, the resulting percentages of the emissions compared to the governing MPE standards are added. Per the FCC, percentages of EMF Density levels of applicable Standards, as specified by the FCC OET Bulletin No. 65 Edition 97.01, are addressed as follows: "Therefore, in mixed or broad band fields where a number of different frequencies are involved the contributing of all RF sources must be considered. When different limits are recommended for different frequencies, the fraction of (or percentages) the limit incurred within each frequency interval should bedetermined and the sum of all such fractions (or percentages) should not exceed 1.0 (or 100 percent)" See section 4.1 in Appendix Al 1 TABLE 11 EMF T_EVF_LS IN MIC.ROWATTS/CM.S 3902 ESPLANADE RD. -SITE #SF03UB322A CHICO CALIFORNIA Proposed Lower than the 1996 Lower than the 1996 UBIQUITEL Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points Combined Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Antenna Residenfl/Cont. Exposure Occupation/Cont. Exposure (5000) Emissions (1000) by a factor of by a factor of Point 1 0.373 2600 13000 R=10' -from base of tower Elev. - 6' Point 2 0.679 1470 7350 R=100' -on-site storage building Elev. - 16' Point 3 0.333 3000 15000 R=500'- Baptist church Elev. - 16' Point 4 0.335 2900 14500 R=1000'- Nearest residential home-Elev. -16' Point 5 0.132 7500 37500 R=2000'- Chico community Elev. -16' , Note: N/A =factor over 100000 7 TABLE IIA EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/ M.SO. 3902 ESPLANADE RD. -SITE #SF03UB322A' CHICO CALIFORNIA Existing Lower than the 1996 Lower than the 1996 NEXTEL Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points Combined Act/ANSIAEEE C95.1-1991 Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Antenna Resident'l/Cont. Exposure (550) Occupation/Cont. Exposure (2750) Emissions by a factor of by a factor of Point 1 1.220 450 2250 R=10' -from base of tower Elev. - 6' Point 2 0.618 880 4400 R=100' -on-site storage building Elev. - 16' Point 3 1.600 340 1700 R=500'- Baptist church Elev. - 16' Point 4 0.611 900 4500 R=1000'- Nearest residential home-Elev. -16' Point 5 0.211 2 600 13 000 R=2000'- Chico community Elev. -16' Note: N/A =factor over 100000 r 3 TABLE IIB EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ 3902 ESPLANADE RD. -SITE #SF03UB322A CHICO CALIFORNIA Proposed Lower than the 1996 'Lower than the 1996 PACBELL Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points Combined Act/ANSVIEEE C95.1-1991 Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Antenna Residenfl/Cont. Exposure Occupation/Cont. Exposure (5000) Emissions (1000) by a factor of by a factor of Point 1 0.172 5800 29000 R=10' -from base of tower Elev. - 6' Point 2 0.158 6300 31500 R=100' -on-site storage building Elev. - 16' Point 3 0.133 7500 37500 R=500'- Baptist church Elev. - 16' Point 4 0.212 4700 23500 R=1000'- Nearest residential home-Elev. -16' Point 5 0.08 12500 62500 R=2000'- Chico community Elev. -16' Note: N/A =factor over 100000 . K References for EMR recommended ceilings, data and comments to radiation sources, radiation hazards and available reports on studies of household appliance`s emitting electromagnetic radiation: Summary of International, Federal, State and Consensus Safety ' Criteria For Exposure to Radio Frequency Energy at Frequencies Used for PCS Communications ' Organization/Government Agency Exposure Power Population Density ' (µW/cm sq.) International -World Occupational 4,875 Health Organization-(EHC 137, 1993) Public 975 International -National Radiological Occupational 10,000 ' Protection Board (NRPB, 1993) Public 10,000 ' A International -European Prestandard (CENELEC ENV.50166-2, 1995 Occupational Public 4,875 975 Federal -Federal Communications Occupational 5,000 Commission(follows NCRP-1986) Public 1,000 ' Consenus Standards American National Standards Institute Occupational 5,000 (ANSI C95.1-1982) Public 5,000 ANSI & Institute of Electrical & Occupational 6,500 Electronic Engineers Public 1,300 ' (ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 ' National Council on Radiation Occupational 5,000 Protection & Measurements Public 1,000 (NCRP Report 86,1986) ' State Codes ' New Jersey (NJAC 7:28-42) Public 5,000 Massachusetts Public 1,000 ' (Dept. of Health, 105 CMR 122) New York State Public 1,000 ' (Dept. of Health follows NCRP-86) P K 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 STATUS P 40%�J_1ZE,)Mr Louis . G. Cornacchia Married, Four Children EDUCATION. - Manhattan College, BEE Iona College, Computer Language Courses= Manhattanvi.11e college, Business Law Courses PRESE�7?': SCXNF_TZCS Corporation -- President Engineering Consultants. After. Market Wireless phone Patent Applied for- US Patent Office Charger tech Services, Inc. -President Engineering Services Clearance -Secret OTHER ACTIVITIES: School B5oard President - New Rochelle. New York. i Finance Campaign Manager- - Mayoral Campaign. New Rochelle, New York. SDA. District Chairman - Boy Scouts of America, New Rochelle, New Yorlc. Chairman of Board of Directors Reliance Bank, 'Wh:i.te Plains , New York Member of Advisory Board. o:f .Patriot National .Bank Stamford. ,Connect:icut, Licensed. Ileal Estate Broker State of New York I 1 Mr. Cornacchi.a has been ' ern.ployed in the Electronics Industry as Electronic Engineer. after recci.ving his BEE from Manhattan College, School of Engineering. Prior to forming Collins Consultants Intl in 1969 and subsequently Charger Tech Services Inc. in 1974, Mr. Cornacchi.a was em.pl.oyed. by Hazeltine E.lectt•onics Corp. as Engineer, Designing Signal. Processor and Radar Display Module for The SAGE System, Primary Early Warning System or DEW LINE, The TPS -1 -GROUND EASED SEARCH RADAR SYSTEM and AWACS (A6E) Power Systems. Subsequently, Lou. was employed by Loral Systems Design ' Team developing the AN/ALQ58 Reconnaissance System and developed (two man team) the precursor XIG TUNER - [ALR -20] Crystal Scanner covering the :full 200 megahertz - 12 gigahz Frequency Range Surveillance System for interception of Enetily Navigational Fire Control and homing Devices for purposes of Identification and Signal Jamming. Seven years after receiving his ' degree Mr. Corn.acchia was .hired as Chief Engineer by Victory Electronic to Develop the Image Intensifier or Night Vision Scopes ' (Using Star. Light) for the Fort Dix Army Command. At Norden Systems, Mr. Cornacchia developed unique, more aggressive programs incorporating Built -In Test Equlpm.ent (:SI'Z'E) to detect on. - coming circuit failures of the Iy111D-E Avionics to increase reliability and was responsible for Air. Force change of Automatic Test Equipment Specifications to accommodate this innovation. ' In 1969 Collins Consul.tan.tsIt � t 1, LTD was foamed to continue servicing Norden Systems in d.evel.opi.ug Automatic Test Programs for ' AIRBORNE Computers and. Navi.gati.onal. Radar Modules. ' In 1974 Charger Tech Services, a New York Corporation was fornmted by Cornacch.ia (President), with Mr. Robert IIa:rris to service additional companies in both the Nuclear and Industrial conn nunities ' on an Engineering Level.. ' In 1987 SCZNETICS was formed. by Mr. Cornacch.ta (President), and application for a service mark was f:i.l.ed with the United States Patent Office, and. granted. SCZNETICS Corporation assumed ' responsibilities for all. Mobile Cellular and. Broadcast Channel Rad' Frequency Environmental Impact Studies as of July 1992. Radio ' A partial listing of companies SCINETICS and Charger .has been contracted with, employing 30 to 50 state of the art Engiileers, Technicians and Programmers, care as follows: 1 Westinghouse Corp. Martin Marietta IBM Allied. Signal - Bend.ix United Technologies Corp. Loral Electronics Systems ITT New York "Telephone Co. Fairchild Camera Division Airborne Instruments Labs Grumann Corp. Miles Inc. Perkin Elmer Corporation NYNEX Shore Media Inc. Syracuse Scientific Corp. Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems Mobile Radio Cellular. EMF Studies and Testimonies Provided by Scinetics For. the Following Communities. Case law decisions* favoring Applicant, where SCINETICS Corp. was mentioned as providing critical written. technical support data and. Expert lestit7lony in appli.cant's application process. (Partial. Listing); Hillsborough, New Jersey Valley Cottage, New York Fair Lawn, New Jersey* New York City, New York Hastings, New York Bedm.ini.ster, New Jersey Martinsville, New Jersey Little Silver, New Jersey* Hazlet, New Jersey* Read.ingt.on, New Jersey* Garwood., New Jersey* IJuntington, New York Hempstead, Now York Armonk, New York * Favorable Supreme Court, Su -P eri.o:r and Appellate Benefiting Cellular Service Court :Decisions o co LU C.) cr. m 0 (n cc Ix LLI 3: 0 CL 0 0 Q O0 CD C:) C) 0 CD C) Ci 9, cc�- C� a.80 00 Y, V , (')i ci 2i C\l IFL C"I0MA"Ka"'GNET1 C P E C TR Non -Ionizing Radiation Ionizing Radiation AM Radio: 535 - 1605 kHz Light CB Radio: 27 MHz ,, 7 Cordless Phones: 49 MHz z TV Ch 2-6: 54 - 88 MHz FM Radio: 88 - 108 MHz j# Marine Radio: 160 MHz TV Ch 7-13: 174-216 MHz TV UHF Ch 14-69: 470 - 800 MHz Cellular Radio, Specialized Mobile Radio, Paging: 806 - 946 MHz Antitheft devices: 10-20 kHz and/or 915 MHz Microwave oven: 915 and 2450 MHz Personal Communication Services: 1800 - 2200 MHz Intrusion alarms / door openers: 10.5 GHz Power Microwave radio: 1 - 40 GHz Frequency Satellite Communications: 100 MHz - 275 GHz 103 106 109 1012 1016 1018 60 Hz 1 kHz 1 MHz 1 GHz Frequency (Hz) EDate 03/07/01 Development Services DepaAment Time 3:12 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet MUP 01-06 * UBIQUITEL Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A Chico, CA 95973 In reference to MUP 01-06 Rounding None Full Precision No Last bill Last charge 03/02/01 Last payment / / Amount $0.00 Date/Slip# Description 08/07/00 Larry P. / P 431539 Processing 08/07/00 Steve B. / P #31603 Processing 08/18/00 Lynn R. / C #32300 Clerical 08/18/00 Diana / P #32327 Processing 08/21/00 Lynn R. / C #31818 Clerical 09/04/00 Lynn R. / C #32070 Clerical 10/02/00 Roland P. / C #32549 Clerical 10/02/00 Diana / P #32583 Processing 02/19/01 Donna M. / C #34835 Clerical TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES TOTAL NO CHARGE TIME CHARGES Page 1 HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TOTAL 1.50 88.50 59.00 5.75 339.25 59.00 1.00 45.00 45.00 0.10 5.90 59.00 0.50- 22.50 45.00 0.50 22.50 45.00 1.00 34.00 34.00 0.50 29.50 59.00 0.75 25.50 NO CHARGE 34.00 10.85 0.75 $25.50 $587.15 Date 03/07/01 Development Services Department Time 3:12 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 2 MUP 01-06 * :UBIQUITEL Leasing Company (continued) TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS $D.00 TOTAL NEW CHARGES $587.15 PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 07/17/00 Deposit— Receipt #18549 (350.00) 11/01/00 Deposit - Receipt #18904 (237.15) TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS ($58.7.15) NEW BALANCE -- TOTAL NEW BALANCE $x.00 Counts s_�...���. �Eatte LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BE -AUTY DIRECTOR'S OFFICE _ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net November 2, 2000 LLC International, Inc. 140 Independence Circle, Suite A Chico, CA 95973 RE: Minor Use Permit, File No. MUP 01-01 Minor Use Permit, File No. MUP 01-05 Minor Use Permit, File No. MUP 01-06 Ladies & Gentlemen: Enclosed are Receipt Nos. 18902, 18903 and 18904 for the above -referenced files. As of this date, the accounts have a zero balance and are closed. Your quick response is greatly appreciated. Thank you. Sincerely, �� p Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services TAP:jb Enclosures Date 11/02/00 *Development Services Depatment Time 8:10 am Applicant Billing Worksheet MUP 01-06 * UBIQUITEL'Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A Chico, CA 95973 In reference to MUP 01-06 Rounding None Full Precision No Last bill Last charge 10/13/00 Last,payment / / Amount Date/Slip# Description 08/07/00 Larry P. / P #31539 Processing 08/07/00 Steve B. / P #31603 Processing 08/18/00 Lynn R. / C #32300 Clerical 08/18/00 Diana /'P #32327 Processing 08/21/00 Lynn R. / C #31818 Clerical 09/04/00 Lynn R. / C #32070 Clerical 10/02/00 Roland P. / C #32549 Clerical 10/02/00 Diana / P #32583 Processing TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS TOTAL NEW CHARGES $0.00 Page '.5 HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TOTAL 1.50 88.50 59.00 5.75 339.2.5 59.00 1.00 45.00 45.00 0.10 5.90 59.00 0'.50 22.50 45..00 0.50 22.50 45.00 1.00 34.00 34.00 0.50 29.50 59.00 10.85 $587.15 $0.00 $587.15 Date-ll/02/00 Development Services Depa0ment Time 8:10 am Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 6 MUP 01-06 * :UBIQUITEL Leasing Company (continued) PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 07/17/00 Deposit - Receipt #18549 (350.00) 11/01/00 Deposit - Receipt #18904 (237.15) TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS ($587.15) NEW BALANCE TOTAL NEW BALANCE $0.00 N October 20, 2000 Ubiquitel Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A Chico, CA 95973 RE: Minor Use Permit, File No. MUP 01-06 Ladies & Gentlemen: utte Count L A N D O F NATURAL W E A L T H A N D BEAUTY DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net The total cost for the processing of the above -referenced application which was approved by the Planning Commission on September 28, 2000, is $587.15. As of July 17, 2000, a deposit was made in the amount of $350.00. The costs exceeded the deposit by $237.15. Below is a breakdown: Deposit on 07-17-00, Receipt No. 18549 $350.00 Professional Planner $339.25 Mapping $ 94.40 Clerical � 153.50 Total $587.15 Total Amount Due & Payable $237.15 Please make a check payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $237.15 and remit it to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 within 30 calendar days. Should you have any questions, please contact Brian Larsen in this office Monday thru Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at 538-7601. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo . Director of Development Services TAP:jb NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: _ Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 X County Clerk County of Butte 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Project Title: MUP 01-06, Minor Use Permit Assessor's Parcel No.: AP # 006-400-056 FROM: Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 CANDACE J. GRUBBS, BUTTE CO. Applicant: Ubiquitel Leasing Company, 140 Independence Circle, Suite A, Chico, CA 95927 Project Location -Specific: On the east side of Esplanade, approx. 900 feet south of Hwy 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico, CA. Project Location -City: Chico Project Location -County: Butte Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: Minor Use Permit to allow six 3 square foot panel anten-las to be mounted at the 60 foot height on an existing 90 foot tall tower, and three small equipment cabinets Name of Person or Agency Approving Project: Butte County Planning Commission Exempt Status: (Check (One) Ministerial (Sec. 15073) Declared Emergency (Sec. 15071(a)) Emergency Project (Sec. 15071 (b) and (c)) X Categorical Exemption. State type arj section number: 15311 Reasons why project is exempt: Placement of seasonal or temporary use items such as lifeguard towers, mobile food ur its,. portable restrooms, or similar items in generally the same locations from time to time in publicly owned parks, stadiums~ or other facilities designed for public use. Contact Person: Stephen Betts Telephone: (530) 538-7601 If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Date Received For Filing: ignature, RaFfy Wilson Principal Planfier K:\PLANNING\PROJECTS\UPM\UBIQUITW ORTHESP\NOE&FEES.WPD • & ECLARATION OF FEES-DUE (Cal' ornia Fish and Game Code Section 710.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Ubiquitel Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A Chico, CA 95927 FILING NO. Project Title/file number: Minor Use Permit/MUP 01-06 CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION (X) A. . ' Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED () A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. () OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT / NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). 2. () NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: Randy Wilson Title: Prin ipal'Planner Lead Agency: Butte County Department of Date: TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. K:\PLANNING\PROJECTS\UPM\UBIQUIT\NORTHESPWOEBFEES.WPD MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: Butte County Assessor's Office FROM: Butte County Planning Department SUBJECT: Ubiquitel Leasing Company, MUP 01-06 DATE: October 12, 2000 Pursuant to Section 65863.5 of the Government Code, the following parcel identified as AP # 006- 400-056, was: Rezone from to zoning district. Granted a variance to 2L Issued a conditional Minor Use Permit to allow six 3 square foot panel antennas to be mounted at the 60 foot height on an existing 90 foot tall tower, and three small equipment cabinets , On the east side of Esplanade, approx. 900 feet south of Hwy 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico, CA.,C-2 (General Commercial) K:\PLANNING\PROJECTS\UPM\UBIQUIT\NORTHESP\MEMO.WPD sate' - L A N D OF NATURAL -WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE' CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 October 12, 2000 Ubiquitel Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A Chico, CA 95927 CERTIFIED MAIL. Re: Minor Use Permit, AP AP # 006400-056 Gentlemen: Enclosed is your validated Minor Use Permit No. MUP 01-06 to allow Minor Use Permit to allow six 3 square foot panel antennas to be mounted at the 60 foot height on an existing 90 foot tall tower, and three small equipment cabinets . Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Roland Parks OA III Enc. cc: Land Development Division (g) Building Division (y) Environmental Health (p) Department of Forestry (gr) MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION • aCT 12 20M DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) MUP 01-06 PERMIT NO. 006-400-056 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: UbiquiTel Leasing Company is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with application filed: Minor Use Permit to install six 3 square foot (8 inches wide x 56 inches high) panel antennas at the 60 -foot level on an existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower, and to install three 6.25 square foot equipment cabinets. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the. procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 12 months of the date of approval. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of approval, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. A Minor Use Permit subject to lapse maybe renewed for an additional period of up to one year, provided that sixty (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date, an application for renewal of the Minor Use Permit is filed with the Planning Division on the prescribed form and accompanied by the necessary data and fees. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 1 ■ material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a permit. Conditions of Approval: The new antennas shall be, painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height they will be located. 2. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. 3. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 4. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. 5. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 6. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 7. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. : 8. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations, within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 10. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible. for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 2 ■ safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 11. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 12. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 13. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 14. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or' retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 15. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 16. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 3 ■ 17. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit E" and date-stamped July 17, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 18. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 19. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable'State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. Building Division: 20. Building permits required for antennas and equipment cabinets. Engineer design calculations are required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings when additional antennas are installed. Environmental Health Division: 21. Prior to storage of fuel or other hazardous materials at the facility submit a Hazardous Materials Release Response Plan or complete a Hazardous Materials and Emissions Questionnaire, and submit to Environmental Health: NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requirement of taining Building and Health Department permits before starting c ction r oes it;X ,ier requirements. Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 4 ■ INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING DIVISION To: File WP 01-06 for Ubiquitel Leasing Co. (North Esplanade Site), APN 006-400- 056 5� From: Steve Betts, Senior Planner Subject: Bond for a radio frequency analysis Date: October 10, 2000 Check # 3454 for $7,500.00 from Ubiquitel Inc. was received this date. $2,500.00 of this amount is for a one-time radio-frequency analysis on Ubiquitel's facilities located on the North Esplanade tower. The remainder of the funds are for radio-frequency analysis for two other Ubiquitel facilities. The funds received were placed in the EIR Trust Account, Account # 1001. cc: Ubiquitel, 140 Independence Circle, Suite A, Chico, CA 95973 LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES • �::... , 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785. September 29, 2000 Ubiquitel Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A Chico, CA 95927 Re: MUP, AP AP # 006-400-056, MUP 01-06 Gentlemen: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held September 28, 2000, your request for a Minor Use Permit, was approved subject to the conditions listed on the permit. Should you desire to appeal any of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, you must do so in writing, to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to 5:00 p.m., Monday, October 8, 2000. The appeal fee of $50.00 must be paid at that time. If you do not appeal and if there are no other appeal within the 10 calendar -day appeal period, the action of the Planning Commission is final. For purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, a Notice of Exemption must be filed. The fee for the filing of a Notice of Exemption is the $25.00 documentary handling fee. A check made payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $25.00 should be submitted to the Planning Division in order to complete the process. You will receive your valid permit, if there are no appeals, after it has been signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and we have received your recorded Certification of Ownership. Pursuant to Section 66020 (d) (2) of the Government Code you are hereby notified that you have 90 days to register a protest challenging any fees, dedications, reservations, or exactions imposed as conditions of approval for this project. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, ASyjzy, Lynn Richardson Planning Administrative Support Service Assistant /lr su tte Count LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION <fb r'c::':�• _ •, -'. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES _ 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-397 ` TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 September 13, 2000 Ubiquitel Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A Chico, CA 95927 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP AP # 006-400-056, MUP 01-06 Gentlemen: At the regular meeting of the Planning Manager on September 13, 2000, your request for a Minor Use Permit to allow six 3 square foot panel antennas to be mounted at the 60 foot height on an existing 90 foot tall tower, and three small equipment cabinets was recommended for approval: An approval recommendation by the Planning representative, has been forwarded to the Planning Commission as a consent item for final action on September 28, 2000, at 9:30 a.m., in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Consent items are set for approval in one motion. These items are considered non -controversial. No presentations will be made, however, some questions may be asked. The Chair will ask if any Commissioner or member of the public. wishes to pull a consent item .for discussion.. . The Minor Use Permit will be issued after approval by the Planning Commission. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts at this office. Sincerely, 41-kl— Lynn Richardson Planning Administrative Support Service Assistant Ir �Lll ,butte C� LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3;:97 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 September 22, 2000 Ubiquitel Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A Chico, CA 95927 Re: MUP, AP AP # 006400-056, MUP 01-06 Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Minor Use Permit to allow six 3 square foot panel antennas to be mounted at the 60 foot height on an existing 90 foot tall tower, and three small equipment cabinets. A public hearing has been set for September 28, 2000, at 9:30 a.m. on the Consent Agenda. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors_' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts of this office at 538-7601, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning Administrative Support Service Assistant Enc. cc: Tecnonic KEngineering Consultants P.C. j:\wpdocs\pc1ts\schedu1e.mrg 9 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION To: Planning Commission From: Stephen Betts, Senior Planner Subject: Consent Agenda Item - File # MUP 01-06 - Minor Use Permit application for UbiquiTel Leasing Company to allow the colocation of antennas on an existing tower, APN 006-400-056 Date: September 28, 2000 Attachments: September 13, 2000, Planning Manager Minutes September 13, 2000, Planning Manager Agenda Report On September 13, 2000, a Planning Manager's meeting was held on the above referenced project. No negative comments, written or orally, were received with regards to this project. Attached please. find the minutes from the September 13, 2000, Planning Manager's hearing. The Planning Manager recommends that the Planning Commission approve the project, subject to the findings and conditions contained in the attached agenda report. K:\PROJECTS\UPM\U BIQUIT\NORTHES P\PCMEMO. W PD I 9 • BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING MANAGER AGENDA REPORT - September 13, 2000 Applicant: UbiquiTel Leasing Company of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico - File #: MUP 01-06 Parcel Size: 4.8 acres Request: Minor Use Permit to colocate six 3 square foot panel Zone date: March 28, 1995 antennas centered at the 60 foot height on an existing 90 Project foot tall tower, and three 6.25 Planner: Stephen Betts square foot equipment cabinets. Supervisor District: 3 G.P.: Commercial Attachments: Zoning: C-2 (General Commercial) A. Conditions of Approval B. Vicinity Map APN: 006-400-056 C. General Plan/Zoning Map D. Photosimulation Location: On the east side of Esplanade, E.-- Site Plan approximately 1,000 feet south STAFF COMMENT: Staff recommends approval of the Minor Use Permit with conditions and findings. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: This project will allow for the installation of six 3 square foot panel antennas centered at the 60 -foot level on an existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower. Each panel antenna is approximately 3 square feet (8 inches wide X 56 inches high) in size. Three 6.25 square foot equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the tower. The proposed panel antennas will provide digital wireless communications (cellular phone service) for the Highway 99 corridor north of Chico. The existing communication facility is unmanned, and does not require a water source or a sewage disposal system. One to two visits to the site will be made per month by company technicians to perform preventive maintenance. Access to the site is from Esplanade via an existing driveway and access road. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 1 0 The project site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Commercial. Surrounding parcels range in size from 3.2 to 91 acres. Land uses on surrounding parcels include agricultural land on the west side of Esplanade, commercial and light industrial uses to the north and south, and Highway 99 to the east. The project site is 4.84 acres in size and is developed with a business that refurbishes and sells large modular storage units, a dwelling unit, the 90 -foot tall lattice tower, and a 200 square foot communication equipment shelter. The existing tower and equipment shelter are located in a 2,500 square foot lease area that is surrounded by a six-foot high chain link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire. A locked gate provides access into the lease area. The tower is painted alternating red and white stripes, and a blinking red light is located on the top of the tower. The existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower was permitted with Use Permit 98-04 and supports three vertical antennas mounted on the top. The Planning Manager recently recommended approval of Minor Use Permit 00-15 to colocate three flush -mounted panel antennas at the 80 -foot level on the tower, but the Planning Commission has not affirmed that recommendation as of the writing of this report. ANALYSIS: General Plan and Zoning: The project site is designated as Commercial by the Land Use Element Map of the General Plan, which allows public uses as secondary uses (note: cellular phone service providers are considered a public utility). Section 24-146 of Butte County Code states that wireless communication facilities are not permitted in the C-2 zone unless a Minor Use Permit is obtained, subject to the requirements of Butte County Code Section 24-262. The Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance (Butte County Code Section 24-262) allows colocation on existing facilities in the C-2 zone with approval of a Minor Use Permit, subject to numerous requirements. The project has been conditioned to meet the requirements of Section 24- 262, including: • Submittal of bonds to cover the costs of a one-time radio-frequency analysis. • Radio-frequency emissions in excess of FCC standards are not allowed. • Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered to be abandoned. • Verification submitted annually attesting that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The additional antennas mounted on the tower will not create an aesthetic impact. The antennas will not increase the height of the tower nor will the additional antennas extend beyond the existing antennas. A photosimulation of the proposed antennas on the existing tower shows that the antennas will not be highly conspicuous. A condition of the project requires that the proposed antennas be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height where they will be installed. The Minor Use Permit to allow three flush -mounted panel antennas on the tower recently recommended for ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 2 ■ approval to the Planning Commission by the Planning Manager did not generate any negative public comments. The radio emissions from the proposed antennas are regulated by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). A radio-frequency analysis written by a registered radio-frequency engineer indicates that the radio emissions from the tower, including the existing nand proposed antennas, will be well within FCC standards for cellular phone facilities for publicly accessible areas near the tower. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Manager take the following actions: I. Recommend that the' Planning Commission find that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15311. Section 15311 consists of construction of minor structures accessory (appurtenant) to existing commercial facilities. Antennas colocated on an existing tower are considered to be accessory structures. II. Recommend approval to the Planning Commission of Minor Use Permit 01-06 for UbiquiTel Leasing Company, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit A and subject to the following findings: A. That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building Division, the Butte County Environmental Health Department, and the Butte County Air Quality Management District. The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Commercial and is zoned C-2. The Commercial land use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. The C-2 zone allows colocation of communication facilities with approval of a Minor Use Permit. B. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 3 ■ Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas will not increase the height of the existing tower or extend beyond the existing antennas. 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property and no additional services or utilities are required. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The project site is already developed with a 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The proposed antennas to be mounted on the existing tower will not have a harmful effect upon the neighborhood character. The radio- frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very little vehicle traffic will be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment shelter. The communications facility is unmanned and only one to two site visits per month will be required after construction. 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed: The site is ideally suited for the project because the proposed antennas will be mounted on the existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower. The project will not have an impact to any agricultural operations. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use will cause any other relevant impact. . C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 4 0 D. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Chapter 24, Section 262, of the Butte County Code. K:\PROJECTS\UPM\UBIQUIT\NORTHESP\NORTHES P.RPT ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE'5 ■ 0 • EXHIBIT A MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) MUP 01-06 PERMIT NO. 006-400-056 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: UbiquiTel Leasing Company is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with application filed: Minor Use Permit to install six 3 square foot (8 inches wide X 56 inches high) panel antennas at the 60 -foot level on an existing 90 -foot tall lattice tower, and to install three 6.25 square foot equipment cabinets. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. -Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 12 months of the date of approval. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of approval, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. A Minor Use Permit subject to lapse may be renewed for an additional period of up to one year, provided that sixty (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date, an application for renewal of the Minor Use Permit is filed with the Planning Division on the prescribed form and accompanied by the necessary data and fees. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 6 ■ 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a permit. Conditions of Approval: Planning Division: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height they will be located. 2. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. 3. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 4. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 6. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 7. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 8. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 7 ■ 0 . 10. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with.FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 11. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 12. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 13. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 14. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 15. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 8 ■ 16. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 17. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit E" and date-stamped July 17, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 18. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 19. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. Building Division: 20. Building permits required for antennas and equipment cabinets. Engineer design calculations are required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings when additional antennas are installed. Environmental Health Division: 21. Prior to storage of fuel or other hazardous materials at the facility submit a Hazardous Materials Release Response Plan or complete a Hazardous Materials and Emissions Questionnaire, and submit to Environmental Health. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 9 ■ - - - - -- - --- --- --- ------ --- -- -- SR -1 A ne 9'f C-1 th al Our_Wa ------ -- - --- Gol Fin Ct ----------ae- Hedstrom WaY ____ -------- M-1---- -- ---- ----- C-2 A 20 P -Q Project Location 3.37 a 0S 00s400-056 to e V Iley •. 8.52 ac -1 3.23 ac C2 5.93 ac 4 0 m M-1 s 58� - A-20 M- . Ga, 500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 Fest BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING MANAGER N Supervisorial Applicant: Ubiquitel, Leasing Co. Owner: David & Nell Stephens Hearing Date:September 13, 2000 @ 9:00 am. Existing Zone: C-2 (General Commercial) Request: Minor Use Permit to allow six 3 square foot panel antennas to be mounted at the 60 foot height on a n District # 3 existing 90 foot tall Tower. Assessor Parcel No: 006-400-056 Fne:MUP 01-06 TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS P.C. v.—\'w.l- A'r.*i 'moi Vk • LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION V •.� " DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES �'.`; .:':•`.~ 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 " September 1, 2000 Ubiquitel Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A Chico, CA 95927 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP # 006-400-056, MUP 01-06 Gentlemen: Your request has been scheduled for hearing in front of the Planning representative on September 13, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held in the Planning Division Conference Room, at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. A recommendation by the Planning representative will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as a consent item for final action. Consent items are set for approval in one motion. These items are considered non- controversial. No presentations will be made, however, some questions may be asked. The Chair will ask if any Commissioner or member of the public wishes to pull a consent item for discussion. The Minor Use Permit will be issued after approval by the Planning Commission. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning Administrative Support Service Assistant Ir Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Manager that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, September 13, 2000, in the Butte County Development Services Conference Room, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following items: 9:00 a.m. - UbiquiTel Leasing Company, Minor Use Permit to colocate six 3 square foot panel antennas centered at the 60 foot height on an existing 90 foot tall tower, and three 6.25 square foot equipment cabinets. The property is located on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 1,000 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Esplanade, Chico. APN 006-400-056 (SB) (MUP #01-06) The above mentioned application and map are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Development Services Department, Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. For information call: (530) 538-7601 (Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) Comments may be submitted in writing at any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. Upon action taken by the Planning Commission on the project an appeal may be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. The appeal period is 10 days. If you challenge the above application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION THOMAS A. PARILO, DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES .4, , MUP 01-06 AP 006-400-056 Ubiquitel Leasing Co. Mk) Environmental Health AARA GG 9 BUTTE�DI�NTY`0UU y o°'/lh DEPARTMENT OF D��++ LOPMENT SERVICES ` 0��� ?�0 PLANNIN�I�i�N Orij��e�IN�U 0 TO: Environmental Health FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Ubiquitel Leasing Company, MUP 0 1 -06 DATE: August 9, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Minor i Tse Permit to allow six 3 square foot panel antennas to be mounted at the 60 foot height on an existing 90 foot tall tower, and three small equipment cabinets on property zoned C-2 (General Commercial) located on The east side of E. lanad-,ap roximate y 900 feet south of Highway 99 at 39002 F, ]n ande, Chico CA identified as APN AP # 006-400-056. Supervisorial District No.3- THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X _ PLANNING MANAGER ON November 16, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN August 24, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. VED 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 AUG 2 1 2007 PLANNING 0 V1IS ON BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Public Works Director FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Ubiquitel Leasing Company, MUP 01-06 DATE: August 9, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: " 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2.. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to allow six 3 square foot panel antennas to be mounted at the 60 foot height on an existing 90 foot tall tower, and three small equipment cabinets on property zoned C 2 (General Commercial) located on The east side ofs lap nade,approximately 900 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 Es 1p ande, Chico CA identified as APN AP # 006-400-056. Supervisorial District No.3. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X _ PLANNING MANAGER ON November 16, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN August 24, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): RECEIVED AUG 14 2U00 BUTTE COUNTY a.r�i _ _ r -r • �: i --- ION By: Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 0 0 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION RECEIVED AUG 14 2000 PLANNING ljjVTS 0 TO: California Department of Forestry FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Ubiquitel Leasing Company, MUP 01-06 DATE: August 9, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in adva-ice for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to allow six 3 square foot panel antennas to be mounted at the 60 foot height on an existing 90 foot tall tower, and three small equipment cabinets on property zoned CC -2 (General Commercial) located on The east side ofs lap nade,approxirr�ately 900 feet south of Highway 99, at 39021, ande, Chico CA identified as APN AP # 006-400-056. Supervisorial District No.3, THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X _ PLANNING MANAGER ON November 16, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN August 24, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages i necessary): CJ By: 4 Date: 7:County.Center Drive - Oroville. California 95965 - 530 -SIR -7601 - FAX 510-51R-7785 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION LAFCo AUG 1 1 2000 Oroville, California TO: LAFCo FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Ubiquitel Leasing Company, MUP 01-06 DATE: August 9, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to a.low six 3 square foot panel antennas to be mounted at the 60 foot height on an existing 90 foot tall tower, and three small equipment cabinets on property' zoned C-2 (General Commercial) located on The east side of Esplanade, approximately 900 feet south of Highway 99, at 3902 E. l� ande, Chico CA identified as APN AP # 006-400-056. Supervisorial District No.3. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X _ PLANNING MANAGER ON November 16, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN August 24, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): AUG i 4 20u 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: ►Il J' 1 16 AP# AP # 006-400-056 REPRESENTATIVE: Tecnonic Engineering Consultans 9100 Centre Pointe Driyt, Suite I 11 West Chester, •i • 45069 0,16IM117-M41 s7riMMIM, IF, M., SIZE: 53.5 x 51.5= 2755- 255 Square Foot 8 MrSnWroms acme Poor! mill SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT #-3—EXISTING ZONING: C-2 (General Commercial) ZONING HISTORY: 6100 ' • 1►1. h 14 we] z wd SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: Storage Facility GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Date Recd 7-26-00 COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST APPLICATION: MUP 01-06 DATE: August 9, 2000 County Offices and Cities: _ Chief Administrative Officer _X-/ Environmental Health _X�Sheriff LAFCo Biggs Oroville Irrigation District: Butte Water _ OWID Table Mountain Irrigation Domestic Water _ Butte Water District OWID Sewer _X/ Develop. Services Director Assessor BCAG Air Quality Mgmt. Gridley _ Paradise Animal Control _ Butte Water District _ Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21)• Fire Protection _X_t✓ California Department of Forestry Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Paradise Recreation & Park Utilities Public Works Director Building Manager ALUC Butte Co. Farm Bureau Chico _ Chico Airport Commission _Xj/ Agricultural Commission Biggs/W. Gridley Water _ Paradise Irrigation Thermalito Irrigation California Water Service Co. _ Thermalito Irrigation District Themalito Irrigation L.O.A. PUD El Medio Fire Protection District Durham Area Recreation Richvale Recreation & Parks Durham Irrigation Richvale Irrigation Other Del Oro Water Co. Other Sterling City Sewer Main Feather River Rec. & Park _ PG&E North - Chico _ Chambers Cable TV Pacific Bell PG&E South - Oroville _ Viacom Cable TV State Agencies CalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept. of Water Resources _ Dept. of Fish and Game _ Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter) _ Dept of Parks and Rec. —Highway Patrol Central Reg. Water Quality Cont. _ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program _ Department of Conservation _ Off. of Mining Reclamation _ Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations Dept.Social Services, Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management _ US Fish & Wildlife Service Army Corps of Engineers Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. Lime Saddle Dist _ Community Association _ Mosq. Abatement. Oroville/Butte Co Drainage _ Butte Env.] Council _ Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society _ Butte Co. Mining Committee _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancy School Districts LEAD - IN SHEET FILE NO: AP# APPLICANT: Name Address OWNER: Name Address REPRESENTATIVE: Name Address REQUEST: '� N\ iAor JSCy-mi+ +c, Q&u� s;x 73 sa nce '�-o"oi` n Coo Aoo 4i, it q0 46,51c. -�cil awcr -�r*-4L SMckq e U ir\b�alled Q-�- -%he 6 61_ o; SIZE: LOCATION: On k1�c ea-ai s th c o4 t s jai argd2 , caopc-o iimQ�tt4 RISC' -Qee'- So�'tln a-' Ozx�g ua�� cad 3802 ESp,�Q'mck, clai co SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT # EXISTING ZONING: C -2 ZONING HISTORY: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: k:\formsVead-in USE PERMIT and MINOR USE PERMIT COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST 3aaR This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their application packet for a communications facility. Please include this checklist along with your submittal. Applicant Planner I . ❑ A completed, signed, Uniform Application and Environmental Information form. If the application is signed by an agent for the property owner, an agent authorization form must be submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. 2. 8/ Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (any unused portion of the deposit will be returned upon final action, if any remains.) (Planner advises applicant) 3. Vi Thirty-five (3 5) copies of plans which shall. include a detailed site plan drawn to scale. All plans shall be drawn on uniform size sheets no greater than 24" x 36". The finished plans shall be folded to 8'/2" x 11 ". The detailed site plan must include: f. lam' Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvements on the property (including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, parking areas, wells, septic tanks and leach fields). 0 IF rNSUFFICIENT rNFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED rNCOMPLETE. 1 a. Name and address of Applicant, Engineer and/or person who prepared the plan. b. Property lines and lot dimensions. c. LJ . Assessor Parcel Number(s) and the street address. d. t✓J LJ Proposed use and/or uses of the property. JUL ' 17 2000 P e. ❑ Proposed landscaping plan, if applicable. BUTTECOUNTY PLANNING DIVISION f. lam' Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvements on the property (including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, parking areas, wells, septic tanks and leach fields). 0 IF rNSUFFICIENT rNFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED rNCOMPLETE. 1 f g. lid Distances from any significant natural and constructed features of the property, such as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major tree stands, storm drains, bodies of water, railroads, to the property lines. h. ❑ Location of all slope banks ponds, creeks, buttes sloughs, rock outcroppings, na.ural ' P , P � g drainage courses, irrigation canals and existing vegetation worthy of consideration for preservation, such as oak trees. PIN i. ❑ Any existing faults or fractures and geologic hazards. j.L1 North arrow and scale of drawing. All plans shall be drawn to an engineering scale with the preferred scale of V = 20', with a north arrow preferably oriented to the top of sheet. k. Building setbacks from the ultimate road right-of-way (front, rear, sides). 1. Proposed and existing on-site driveways and/or roads. m. Location, height, and materials of walls and fences (sections may be required). . n. All driveways, drawn to scale, on adjacent and across the street properties Mdthin' 100 feet of the subject site. o. Existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks and existing paving widths on-site or within 100 feet of the site, on adjacent and across the street properties. P Nearest cross streets on both sides with plus or minus distances from subject s_te. q. Approximate location of all buildings within 1,000 feet on adjacent properties. • � r. Existing and nearest fire hydrants. s. Access, both pedestrian and vehicular, showing service areas and points of ingress and egress. t. Elevation contours, at a minimum per USGS maps. IF INSUFFICIENT rNFOR,*vIATION IS SUB?VtITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE.. 2 (�4. ❑ Conceptual Grading Plan Items to be shown include: Ply a. ❑ L7 Natural areas to be preserved. PIPA b. ❑ Lam" Proposed cut and fill areas in contrasting colors of zipatone pattern.)Oyl,Q -d�(&-) v/6 c. ❑ 12/ Existing and proposed contours within 100 feet of project boundaries. G �I(k d. ❑ . L�' Proposed drainage and flood control facilities. i P/Ae. ❑ Erosion control measures (e.g. - slope landscaping). C4 , f. ❑ l' Natural drainage. . L� Elevations and finished contours. AP h. ❑ E9 Location of retaining walls, drainage channels and existing structures. ( C 1 i. Location, elevation and size of proposed building pads. j. Lam' All plans must be clear and legible. 5. WOne co of 8 ''/z" x 11" transparency reduction of the detailed site plan. PY P Y 6. A vicinity ma showing closest major cross streets, zoning and existing land use. P g The followin .additional items are required per Butte County Code Section 24-262.E. 7. 6LJ /Statement of Justification: a. LJIncludes a description of the proposed Facility, including the type of facility being requested. IF rNiSUFFICI ENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 3 b. Height from natural grade to the top of proposed Facility. C. Support equipment proposed. d. L) RFR/EMF and wattage output data including the number of channels. e. Horizontal and vertical location coordinates. 8. [,/proposed elevations of the structure and any accessory buildings, including building height and other physical dimensions, drawn to graphic scale. V9. Visual impact assessment, photo montages, mock-ups as determined by the Director of Development Services or Planning Commission. The assessment shall identify any proposed trimming of vegetation that will be required for the normal operation of the Facility. Stealth technology is encouraged. 10. Mock -u s required (may be required at any time during the processing of the permit). 11. �A discussion of and supporting information regarding the alternative site selection of at least PP � g g a minimum of three to four other sites, if available, including colocation opportunities, and a tattement s to why these alternative sites and/or colocation opportunities were rejected. I 12. A com Tete service area ma showing the entire wireless communications network of the P P provider's twenty (20) miles in all directions from the proposed site for the time period from the filing of the application to twelve (12) months from the filing of the application, for the purpose of visually aiding cumulative environmental analysis, with and without the proposed Facility or Facilities, showing all hand-off sites within the above specified area. 13. 2A graphic depiction of the searc ring and al other technical criteria used in determining 1� the proposed Facility location. )C 14. 0/ (J Documentation which. identifies failure characteristics of the Facility structure or tower z.nd demonstrates that the Sit e nclsetb1acks are of adequate size to contain falling debris. 15. E/ 2/written evidence demonstrating g that the selected Facilitystructure or tower design is as visually unobtrusive as possible, given technical and engineering considerations, which indicate what type of Facility is required to provide reasonably effective service and also the best technology and/or construction available to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness. IF INSUFFICIENT [NFORNIATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED fNCONIPLETE. 4 • The use of best available technology and/or construction to maximally achieve visual 16. /nobtrusiveness is mandatory. 'Applicants which operate common carrier facilities (specifically, but not limited to cellutar, PCS, SMR and paging service licensees of the FCC) shall provide written evidence that the applicant has provided notice to all FCC licensed wireless communication service carriers operating within the County of Butte of the plans to develop the site. 17. Ed ❑ Evidence of a valid, current operating license or construction permit from the FCC or, if the applicant is not a wireless communications service provider, a user operating agreement'or each and every suc provid r to which the applicant intends to rent space on the propossed Facility. C 18. A report, signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer licensed by the FCC, prepared pursuant to FCC OET 65, stating whether the maximum radio frequer_cy radiation/electromagnetic radiation (RF/EMF) to be emitted by the proposed Facility, taking into account all other Facilities, both existing and known future Facilities, at the proposed site and adjacent properties, conforms to safety standards adopted by the FCC, if applicable. The reports prepared for Facilities shall conform to the reporting requirements set by the County and FCC OET 65 human exposure standards. The report shall also analyze the evidence provided in support of the proposed Facility location, height and radiated power, frequency, the number of channels, and all other related data and present alternatives for the location, height and radiated power, pursuant to the requirements of this section— If the proposed Facility exceeds FCC OET 65 human exposure standards, applicant shall a:so :. provide additional comprehensive technical and planning information regarding. how the. _. . applicant shall protect all persons from such excessive -exposure consistent with all Federal and State requirements, and any additional Co my requirements. C ZZ 4� PRi) 19. Landscaping and painting plans for the completed project. 20. ❑ Projects in Agricultural Zones (A-5 through A-160) shall, prior to submitting an application P/N for a proposed Facility, submit a site plan of the proposed Facility to the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner for comment and send a notification letter to all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the.County informing them of the proposed _ite . location and .tower height. No hearing on an application for a proposed facility in Eny. agricultural zone will be scheduled, nor shall.any Administrative Permit for any such facility be issued without proof that the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner and all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County have been notified, as specified herein IF FNSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 5 21. ❑ EZI applications for Facilities that are proposed to be located within the boundaries of any Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan or Airport Area of Influence, as adopted or designated from time to time by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission, shapl be submitted to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division, and a copy submitted to the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission for review rega-Hing consistency with adopted Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plans and for recommendations addressing potential impacts to air navigation within the Airport Area of Influence. The County may in its sole discretion retain an independent consultant to review either indivilual . elements of or the entire application and advise the County at the applicant's sole expense. Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the move submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. Signature: Appltcan resentative Signature: @ak", P armer eceiving —Application ti FCR�tS'SUO�t(TAL'CiIECKUS CELLI:P `A'PO Date `( D Date: 7 4io IF INNSUFFICIENT INFOR:NLATION IS SUB,NIITTED, THE APPLICATION 4 -!ILL PE DEEMED INCOtIPLETE- 6 rd GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SMALL VERIFY ALL PINS. EXIST= CONDITIONS. ANO DIMENSIONS OF THE JOB SITE PRIOR M SURTNG WORK IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENCItEER N MRITW OF MY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDW WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME 2. FIGURED DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR 91ALL BE SOLELY RESPONME FOR WORK PROCEEOMC N A SAFE AND ORDERLY MAKER N ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPUOIEIF CODES AND REOURE1ENiS OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. CONTMACTOR AID/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES MST BIIEDIATELY NOTIFY THE CONSTRICTION MANAGER OF ANY UNSAFE CONDITIONS OUPoND THE COURSE OF WORK. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL CNE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS. OFOQIAIM RUUSS. REGULATIONS ANO LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUNIC AUTH01M. MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIRCATIONS, AND LOCAL AND STATE .RRISDICTION& CODES EEARNC ON THE PEI30RIIANCE OF THE WORK. THE WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT AND THE MATERIALS INSTALLED SWILL BE N STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH AL APP UCABIE CODES. REGULATIONS. ANO ORDINANCES 5_ THE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE R1169SImNC ALL MATERIALS. EQUIPMENT.LABOR AND ALL OTHER MATERIALS ANN LABOR DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WOFIX/PROJECT AS DESCRIBED HINAL APPROVED ®SEP 2Dv2gment Pian DATE Ub %dmiT I USE PERMIT VARIANCE iqmv e MINOR U.P. ADM.PERMIT • k l PLANNING COMMISS. MUD C119""EEK DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 3902 ESPLANADE CHICO, CA 951973 _ BUTTE COUNTY SF03UB322A CO -LOCATION OF ANTENNAS I 11tCE1VED JUN 0 ti c000 N RECEIVED r JUL 11 2000 PLANNTNC, COUNTY 4 a 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EOUIPYEINT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO THE WINUFACTURERIS / VENDOWS SPECIFrATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERNLSE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORONANCES TAME PRECEDENCE. 7. CONTRACTOR SMALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRMED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SWILL EIE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS. AN S. METHODS. TECHNIQUES. SEOUENC.ES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. d CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT DaSTNG WROVDIENTS• EASEMENTS, PAVING, anmr, ETC. DURDFG CONsiac ION. UPON COMPLETION OF WORN. THE CONTRACTOR SWILL REPAIR MY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. 9. CONTRACTOR STALL KEEP THE GENERAL WORK AREA CLEAN AND HAZARD FREE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS, RU889N AND RElMOIIE EOUIPIMNT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMADM ON THE PROPERTY. PREMISES SWILL BE LEFT N CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PANT SPOTS. OUST. OR SLUDGES OF ANY MATURE. 10. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED FOR 24'x36' (SIZE D). DO NOT SCALE OTHER SIZED VERSIONS OF THESE ORAWDKS GENERAL LEGEND SECTION NUMBER x i x -x ,J SHEET NUMBER) DRAWING SECTION SECTION NUMBER x SHEET NUMBER DETAIL SECTION NUMBER 1 X. S x -x SHEET NUMBER DETAIL ENLARGEMENT I NTS = NOT TO SCALE H SHEET INDEX NO. SHEET TITLE NO. T-1 TITLE SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER DANT R NELL STEPHE S Z-1 ROT PLAN 1 Z-2 ELEVATION, SITE PUN, R DETAILS 2 39D2 ESPLANADE LATITUDE: e CH IOD, CA 95973 LONGITUDE; 12153.41' SITE ADDRESS: 35973 ESPLANADE ELEVATION: 1 171.1• CHKX% CA 95973 APPLICANT; UBIOUTTEL 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE, SUITE A USGS MAP; N/A CHHICO, CA 95973 DEED BOOK PAGE: BOOK 16, PACE 12 PROJECT SUMMARY SITE NUMBER: SE03UB322 PROPERTY OWNER DANT R NELL STEPHE S SITE DATA: SITE NAPE MO CREEK 39D2 ESPLANADE LATITUDE: 3947.27' CH IOD, CA 95973 LONGITUDE; 12153.41' SITE ADDRESS: 35973 ESPLANADE ELEVATION: 1 171.1• CHKX% CA 95973 APPLICANT; UBIOUTTEL 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE, SUITE A USGS MAP; N/A CHHICO, CA 95973 DEED BOOK PAGE: BOOK 16, PACE 12 PARCEL NUMBER 006-400-056 CONTACT PERSON: STEVE RUPPEINWAL (530) 897-5005 REFERENCE WAP LOT NUMBER: 13 PACE: N/A ; PAM ZONNG C-2 COMMERCIAL RCIAL 2 AMSDICTION: B UITE COUNTY M. N/A VICINITY MAP stye TRITE NORTH DRIVING DIRECTIONS FROM: 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE. TAKE HWY 99 NORTH AND LEFT ON ESPLANADE. I PROJECT DESRIPTION I INSTALLATION OF THE UBIOUITEL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY CONSISTING OF SEVEN EQUIPMENT CABINET (3 INITIAL. 4 FUTURE). ANTENNAS CONSIST OF (3) SECTORS WITH (2) INIAL AND (1) FUTURE. PANEL ANTENNAS AT EACH SECTOR LOCATED AT AN ANTENNA CENTER OF 60' ON THE EXISTING LATTICE TOWER APPROVALS LANDLORD LFASNG RF. ZONING CONSTRUCTION AR£ TECTONIC CONSULMATS P.C. 9100 Centre Pante Or. Ste. 100 West Chester, OH 45069 PAons (513) 942-9530 F= (513) 442-9531 %* LCC IOC MTE1b4111O7 AL• MC 7925 "XS BRAMCH URW Yt1LAT. VA "IMM UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE QFOFOLUION CONTAMED N THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS 5 PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO UBIOIAIEL IS SIRICTLT PROH181tE0 MAW MUD—CREEK SF03UB322A MM ESNAWAX CHM CA 95973 PROJECT NO: 26B3SF322A DRAWN BY: FR CHECKED BY: LFHF I SUBMITTALS 1 12- `� cIVI� F OF CAS sEn xtic TITLE PAGE sm mesa T-1 I NOTES THE LATITUDE AND LONdTUDE AT THE CENTER OF THE ENSTING TOWER WAS DETEfbOIED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS. LAT. 39.4r20.7- N. NAD 83 LONG 1 2153'39.30' 1L NAD til CTEV. 174.1' NAVD 88 (BASIS OF DRAUNG) UIL 39.47'27.1 IL NAD 27 LONG. 12153'3&4' W. NAD 27 ELEV- 171.8' NGVD 29 The information shorn oboTe meets or ecadll the reOuia w ts set forth it FAA order 8260.19c for 1-A ow%oc7 ( t 15' horiacntmy and t 3' Terticoe7� The horiavtd datum (eoord.otes) are eip.emd m dsgses, minutm end seconds, to the nearest tenth of o semnd. The vertical doturn (heights) we expressed in feet and decrrlok lhersor aw ve detsrmned to the nearnt Qt feel (itUM ELEV. - 174.1' AELS.L (NAVD 88) TOP OF STRUCTURE ELEV. - 257.8 AEL&L (NAW 88) STRUCTURE HEN;HT - 101.r GRAPHIC SCALE ( Or YET ) 1 mets -10 R (109 R4" s 7e' PLC" mKTY IN aANOID ST LN sE301 UIOC RD 11TT ImIm SITE VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE LEGEND -�---f- UIIOERGRWDfATER ---r---T-- UNDERGROUND TEU34CW - -E- - -E- - UNDEM IM EIECTU CAL --o---0-- ukwa Imm CAS - - - - - - - mu empla"T TIE - MOLW PROPERTY UWE o PONER POLE (P.P.) o FLOW IMT FEE NVORANT pe "alm VALVE ® EICTRC FEVER � YIq EIOi OEYATm1AT IOP ort:OFOETE %(E ELEVATION AT FAME ' OEVATOI AT ma aF Pamawya ��1, ELEVATION AT NAnXM 01aTW tiNTFIRRE OF STREET 9R RA1 BA7FD 4 y wRD film / ADVANCE DF9UI CONSArANT. IlC /Dn JA- I LOT 13 OF MOUNTAIN VIEW SUB, I SEC 5, T 22 N, R 1 E, M.D.M. i APN_ 006-400-056 Ea3esc Ir DROP I x I K I .z.. QFDETIC LOCADON at" KDE a0' A Ia' EmAPeOrt SIELTER E msmuc CAM TRAT -E Savc W IATTaE IDM \yI' x Q I x •� x t- Ot.CL 4JRACE SIS TEL NPLAN TECTONIC CAFGMEERTNC CCWSLILTANTS P.C. 9100 Centre Pointe Dr. Ste. t00 Neral Cheste•. OH 45069 Phone: (513 942-9530 For. (513) 2-9531 t�o LCC -fn7Nunauk Ole 7925 A7NFS OUN04 DRIVE YdFAAL VA 22102 UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE WOR)IATION CONTAINM N TNS SET OF DOCUUENIS 5 PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR OWDSURE OTHER THAN THAT MGM RELATES TO MOIAM IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. ""OW MUD CREEK SF03UB322A see ESPIIANtaE D¢a CA 957T3 PROJECT NO: nnSF322A WAVN BT: -BJAj CHECKED BY: LIg SUBMITTALS Y ID �N 52279 F -(P_ /2 -3/ -oz- ��•9%� Club•- PLOT PLAN THEA TEEM Z-1 Fie1Rc TpTD ,•RAF 41E RM a�IID A 3UlET Of LDWSE DES" C461ATAfL Ur- 01M 6/14/on •1D FIELD 1FI61JNDIu m ev TEcrow Ot1RFF/EFC 1-1 ,/r cr 4UTM ,r UK D.uF LIDiDFLECT 8301 Mr. *REAM aoo e/ Lam ! OKRRM w9m Plml ,msmT CWE T NKNMUT oleo malsmoP v wwmio , sms r ! 1/41 ffi RUi caum a tleE y ANWIF Sr•FRES sma CAM New -iCOAXIAL CABLE SUPPORT \!:x/saC fR z -z 4 `- SITE SITE PLAN DDET ®D,/e>oz To L13 rsizaar LL . MELD FFr11E3 r n` Ism TWU-B0.T L2.Ni/4 —\ I DETrE I 1 Fog -= 1F1 ./s/fHous U T taFE •FaE � DErar"L i U T1nau-®Lr 9 m L --JI 2T1 Pie a a 1U •u� Me • ICE BRIDGE DETAIL _-= s e era F OF PROPM r,-\ EQUIPMENT PAD PLAN \LV sML- „5 x ELEVATION _-= sr3RE frs e M® om" r„PMR LAWSJiPE 3/4' MafD SMW/ Mew DR EDu•L AS1Y C11 SUE Ra ST -` m,a1OED suam [ J GRAVEL SURFACING DETAIL TECTONIC ENG=NEERINC COMSULTAN=S P.C. 9100 Centra Point! DF- Ste. 100 Meat C1lesteT. ON 45069 PINW-W (513) 942-9530 Fox (513) 442-9531 LCC LCC NIEW"TIO•At. DLC nn "*N mmcm m1m W FAN VA 'Mfg UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE DIFOWTION CWL%mED M THIS SET OF DOCLAIM IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN TW MOM RELATES TO UMOU ITEL 5 STRICTLY PROH180ED. "OW MUD CREEK SF03UB322A sm cglm DE o1w. a 2%73 PR0.1£CT NO: 2683SF322A DRAVN BY- FR CHECKED BY= LW SUBMITTALS ae/zD/oD RE11Hp Eoli. ! ,D.w DJ/x�/UD Fpr zD1.D � EX�/z-3i-o2 SITE PLAN L DETAILS Dal umm Z-2 u I SATE 'PLAN C 7 QCOAmIAL CABLE S PPORT , BICE BRIDGE DETAIL G EOMI PMENT PAD PLAN i/•��ij i�/ice/.iii/� OGRAVEL SURFACING DETAIL COMMUNICATIONS SIT F. LEASE A f REENEVTfGR0UN0) I This CommunieeI" Site Lease Agrecment(Ground) ('Agreement') is entered into this day or-TULY 1997 oetw<en, SAIART SMR OF CALIFORNIA, NC., a Delaware corporation, dMa Nextel Communications, ('•Lessee"), and DAVID L. iTEPHENS & NELL STEPHENS, husband and wife as Community Property, ("Lessor"). For good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufTeiency of which is hereby acknowledged• the panics hereto agree as roller+s: I. Premiset. Lessor is the owner of a parcel of land (the "Land") located in the City of Chico, County of Bone, State of Celifomia commonly known as 5902 Esplanade, Chico, CA 95913 (APN: 006400-056). The Land is more particularly described in Exhibit AI and Q annexed hereto. Lessor hereby Imes to Lessee and Lessee Imes from Lessor, approximately Two Thousand Five Hundred (2,300) square fectrof the Land and all access and utility casements (the "Premises'), as described in Exhibit B annexed hereto. I. U_e. The Premises may be used by Lessee for any activity in connection with the provision of communications services. Lessor agrees to cooperate with Lessee, at Lessee's expense, in making application fur and obtaining all licenses, permits and any and all other neeessw approvals that may be required for Lessee's intended use of the Premises. 3. Tests and Construction. Lcssec shall have the right at any time following the full execution of this Agreement to enter upon t.:e Land for the purpose of making appropriate engineering and boundary surveys• inspections, soil test borings, other reasonably neeessar+ tests and constructing the Lessee Facilities (as defined in Paragraph 6(a) below). , a. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be five (5) years commencing on the date Lessee begins construction of Lessee facilities nr eighteen (1 S) months alter full ceecution of this Agreement, whichever first oecun ("Commencement Date") and terminating on the fifth anniversary of the Commencement Date ((he "Term) unless otherwise terminated as provided in Paragraph 10. Lessee shall have the right to extend the Term for frve (5) successive five (5) year periods (the "Renewal Terms) on the same terms and conditions as set forth herein. This Agretrrtent shall automatically be extended for each successive Renewal Term unless Lessee notifies Lessor of its intention not to renew prior to eommneement of the succeeding Renewal Term. S. Rent. (a) Within fifteen (I i) business days followins! the Commencement Date and on the ftrn day of each month thereafter, Lessee -,all pay to _essor as «m ,.. .. ;err month ("Rent'). Rent for any fractional month a the beginnieg or at the end of the Term or Renewal Term shall be prorated. Rent shall be payable to Lessor at 4192 Stone Valley Court, Chico, CA 9J97% Attention: David L. Stephens and Nell Stephens. (b) On each anniversary of the Commencement Date, Lessee shall pay the then current Rent, increased by any percentage inch- which occurred in the Consumer Price Index (`CPI-) for "All Items - All Urban Consumers" for the San Fra teisco-Oakland-San losehttropolitan Statistical Arca during the preceding year period. However, such increase shall not ex—c! five percent (3%) of the Rent in effect ]taring the previous year. 6. Facilities- Utilities; Access. (a) Lessee has the right to erect, maintain and opente on the Premises radio communications facilities, including without limitation an antenna tower or pole and foundation, utility lines, transmission lines, air conditioned equipment shelter($), electronic equip—t. radio transmitting and receiving antennas, supporting equipment and structures thereto ("Lessee Facilities-). In connection therewith. Lessee has the right to do all work necessary to prepare, maintain and alter the Premises for Lessee's business operations and to install transmition linea connecting the antennas to the nansmillem and receivers. All of Lessee's construction and installation work shall be performed at L—ce's sole cost and expense and in a good and workmanlike manner. Title to the Lessee Facilities shall be held by Lessee. All of Lessee Faeaiiies shall remain Lessee's personal property and arc not fixtures. Lessee has the right to remove all Lessee, Facilities at its sale expense on or xfom the exprtattan or earlier termination of the Agreement; provided, Lessee repain any damage to the Premises caused by such remo-al. Upon termination of this Agreement. Lessee shall not be required to remove any foundation more than one (1) foot below grade level. (b) Lessee shall pay for the electricity it consumes in its operations at the rate charged by the servicing utility company. Lessee :hall have the right to draw electricity and other utilities from the existing utilities on the Land or obtain separate utility service from any utility eor_--party that will provide service to the Land (including a standby power generator (or Lessee's exclusive use). Lessor agrees to sign such doatments or casements as may be required by said utility companies to provide such service to the Premises, including the grant to Lessee or to the servicing utility company at no cost to the Lessee• of an casement through the Land as required by such servicing utility company to provide urlerground utility services as provided herein. Any easement necessary for such power or other utilities will be at a location acceptable to Les r and the .rvicing utility company. Lessee agrees that any new utility lines will be located underground. (c) Lessee, Lcssee's employees, agent; subcontractors, lenders and invitees shall have access to the Premises without notice to Lessor twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week, at no charge. Lessor grants to Less". and its agents, employees, contractors, guests and invitees, a non-exclusive right and easement for pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress across that portion of the Land described in Exhibit B. (d) Lessor shall m ;rlain a!t errcese mad,y_ h"- •`.----•-• pbiic r4.0 ) to the Premises in a manner sufficient to allow pedearian and vehicular access at all times under normal weather conditions. Lessor shall be responsible for maintaining and repairing such roadway, as its sole expense, except for any damage caused by Lessee's use o(such roadways. MMIMPETM (a) Lessee shall operate the Lessee Facilities in a manner that will not cause interfere -nee to Lessor and other lessees or licensees of_he Land, Provided that their installations predate that of the Lessee Facilities. All operations by Lessee shall be in compliance with al Federal I smmunications Commission ("FCC') requirements. (b) S:Ibsequent to the installation of the Lessee Facilities, Lessor shall not permit iuelf, its lessees or licenses to Install new celui7mcnt on the Land or prepeny contiguous thereto owned or controlled by Lessor, if such equipment is likely to cause interference with L—cc's coentions. Such interference shall be deemed a material breach by Lessor. In the event interference occurs, Lessor agrees to take all reasondble steps necessary to eliminate such interference• in a reasonable time period. 8. Taxes. If personal prapcny taxes arc assessed, Lessee shall pay any portion of such was directly attributable to the Lessee Faeilitim Lessor shall pay all real property taxes, assessments and deferred taxes on the Land. CAlt a.a'$,.r Creea L 1 1 a111aR,91a At, 9. Waiver of Lessor's Lien (a) Lessor waives any lien rights it may have concerning the Lessee Facilities which are deemed Lessee's personal property and not fixtures, nd Lessee has the right to remove the same at any time without Lessor's consent. (b) Lessor acknowledges that Lessee has entered into a financing arrangement including promissory notes and financial and security agreements for the financing of the Lessee Facilities (the "Collateral") with a third party financing entity (and may in the future enter into additional financing arrangements with other financing entities). In connection therewith, Lessor (i) consents to the installation of the Collateral; (ii) disclaims any interest in the Collateral, as fixtures or otherwise; and (iii) agrees that the Collateral shall be exempt from execution, foreclosure, sale, levy, attachment, or distress for any Rent due or to become due and that such Collateral may be removed at any time without recourse to legal proceedings. 10. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated without further liability on thirty (30) days prior written notice as follows: (i) by either party upon a default of any covenant or term hereof by the other party, which default is not cured within sixty (60) days of receipt of written notice of default, provided that the grace period for any monetary default is ten (10) days from receipt of notice; or (ii) by Lessee for any reason or for no reason, provided Lessee delivers written notice of early termination to Lessor no later than thirty (30) days prior to the Commencement Date; or (iii) by Lessee if it does not obtain or maintain any license, permit or other approval necessary for the construction and operation of Lessee Facilities; or (iv) by Lessee if Lessee is unable to occupy and utilize the Premises due to an action of the FCC, including without limitation, a take back of channels or change in frequencies; or (v) by Lessee if Lessee determines that the Premises are not appropriate for its operations for economic or technological reasons, including, without limitation, signal interference. 11. Destruction or Condemnation. If the Premises or Lessee Facilities are damaged, destroyed, condemned or transferred in lieu of condemnation, Lessee may elect to terminate this Agreement as of the date of the damage, destruction, condemnation or transfer in lieu of condemnation by giving notice to Lessor no more than forty -rive (45) days following the date of such damage, destruction, condemnation or transfer in lieu of condemnation. If Lessee chooses not to terminate this Agreement. Rent shall be reduced or abated in proportion to the actual reduction or abatement of use of the Premises. 12. Insurance. Lessee, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, shall procure and maintain on the Premises and on the Lessee Facilities, bodily injury and property damage insurance with a combined single limit of at least One Million and 00/100 Dollars (51,000,000.00) per occurrence. Such insurance shall insure, on an occurrence basis, against all liability of Lessee, its employees and agents arising out of or in connection with Lessee's use of the Premises, all as provided for herein. Lessor shall be named as an additional insured on Lessee's policy. Lessee shall provide to Lessor a %rcificate of insurance evidencing the coverage required by this paragraph within thirty (30) days of the Commencement Date. 13. Waiver of Subrogation. Lessor and Lessee release each other and their respective principals, employees, representatives and agents, from any claims for damage to any person or to the Premises or to the Lessee Facilities thereon caused by, or that result from, risks insured against under any insurance policies carried by the parties and in force at the time of any such damage. Lessor and Lcssce shall cause each insurance policy obtained by them to provide that the insurance company waives all right of recovery by way of subrogation against the other in connection with any damage covered by any policy. Neither Lessor nor Lessee shall be liable to the other for any damage caused by fire or any of the risks insured against under any insurance policy required by.Paragraph 12. 14. Assignment and Subletting. Lessee may not assign, or otherwise transfer all or any part of its interest in this Agreement or in the Premises without the prior written consent of Lessor; provided, however, that Lessee may assign its interest to its parent company, any subsidiary or affiliate or to any successor -in -interest or entity acquiring filly -one percent (51%) or more of its stock or assets, subject to any financing entity's interest, if any, in this Agreement as set forth in Paragraph 9 above. Lessor may assign this Agreement upon written notice to Lessee, subject to the assignee assuming all of Lessor's obligations herein, including but not limited to, those set forth in Paragraph 9 above, and Lessee may sublet or license all or any portion of the Premises to one or more entities for communications uses only, without Lessor's consent. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, Lessee may assign, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise transfer without consent its interest in this Agreement to any financing entity, or agent on behalf of any financing entity to whom Lessee (i) has obligations for borrowed money or in respect of guaranties thereof, (ii) has obligations evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes or similar instruments, or (iii) has obligations under or with respect to letters of credit, bankers acceptances and similar facilities or in respect of guaranties thereof. 15. Warranty of Title and Quiet Enjoyment. Lessor warrants that: (i) Lessor owns the Land in fee simple and has rights of access thereto and the Land is free and clear of all liens, encumbrances and restrictions; (ii) Lessor has full right to make and perform this Agreement; and (iii) Lessor covenants and agrees with Lessee that upon Lessee paying the Rent and observing and performing all the terms, covenants and conditions on Lessee's part to be observed and performed, Lessee may peacefully and quietly enjoy the Premises. Lessor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Lessee from any and all claims on Lessee's leasehold interest. 16. Repairs. Lessee shall not be required to make any repairs to the Premises or Land unless such repairs shall be necessitated by reason of the default or neglect of Lessee. Except as set forth in Paragraph 6(a) above; upon expiration or termination hereof, Lessee shall restore the Premises 'o the condition in which it existed upon execution hereof, reasonable wear and tear and loss by casualty or other causes beyond Lessee's control xcepted. 17. Hazardous Substances. Lessee agrees that it will not use, generate, store or dispose of any Hazardous Material on, under, about or within the Land in violation of any law or regulation. Lessor represents, warrants and agrees ( I ) that neither Lessor nor, to Lessor's knowledge, any third party has used, generated, stored or disposed of, or permitted the use, generation, storage or disposal of, any Hazardous Material (defined below) on, under, about or within the Land in violation of any law or regulation, and (2) that Lessor will not, and %•rill not permit any third party to use, generate, store or dispose of any Hazardous Material on, under, about or within the Land in violation of any law or regulation. Lessor and Lessee each agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other and rhe other's partners, effii;ulcs, agents and employees against any and all loses, liabilities, claims and/or costs (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs) arising from any breach of any representation, warranty or agreement contained in this paragraph. As used in this paragraph, "Hazardous Material" shall mean petroleum or any petroleum product, asbestos, any substance known by the state in which the Land is located to cause cancer and/or reproductive toxicity, and/or any substance, chemical or waste that is identified as hazardous, toxic or dangerous in any applicable federal, state or local law or regulation. This paragraph shall survive the termination of this Agreement. .g. Miscellaneous. (a) This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties, and supersedes all offers, negotiations and other agreements concerning the subject matter contained herein. Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by both Forties. (b) If any provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable with respect to any party, the remainder of this Agreement or the application of such provision to persons other than those as to whom it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected and each provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. (c) This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the successors and permitted assignees of the respective parties. CA713A.Sycam Crerk.LVl 2 07/I4.97,954 AAI (d) Any notice or demand required to be given herein shall be made by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, cr reliable overnight courier to the address of the respective parties set forth below: .essor: DAVID L, STEPHENS & NELL STEPHENS Lessee: Smart SMR of California, Inc. 4192 Stone Valley Court 2180 Harvard Street, Suite 220 Chico, CA 95977 Sacramento, CA 95815 Phone Number: (916) 894-2921 Attn.: Property Manager With a copy to: Nextel Communications, Inc. 1505 Farm Credit Drive McLean, VA 22102 Ann.: Legal Dept., Contracts Manager Lessor or Lessee may from time to time designate any other address for this purpose by written notice to the other party. All notices hereunder shall be deemed received upon actual receipt. (e) This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. (f) Lessor acknowledges that a Memorandum of Agreement in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit C will be recorded by Less.;e in the official records of the County where the Land is located. In the event the Land is encumbered by a mortgage or deed of trust, Lessor :groes to obtain and furnish to Lessee a non-disturbance and attornment instrument for each such mortgage or deed of trust. (g) Lessee may obtain title insurance on its interest in the Land. Lessor shall cooperate by executing documentation required by-the title insurance company. (h) . In any case where the approval or consent of one party hereto is required, requested or otherwise to be given under this Agreement, such party shall not unreasonably delay or withhold its approval or consent. (i) All Riders and Exhibits annexed hereto form material parts of this Agreement. Q) This Agreement may be executed in duplicate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. LESSOR: LESSEE: DAVID L. STEPHENS & NELL STEPHENS, SMANcel F CA RNIA; INC., husband and wife as Community Prop rt y a Drat p d/b ations By: Q/(/C9f 9y: David L. Stephens r�� Title: 0600e-r- Title: JARVIS Date: 1A?7 Date: JUL 2 9 1997 "fax IDH:_��nS—S'�' 7077 PRESIDENT NO. CALIFORNIA MARKET By Nell Stephens Title: �Jtd/I2-✓ Date:%�6Z?;, Tax IDN: CA713A.SY<m —Cre UVI a I0. 07/14/97,1:9 -A -M EXHIBIT At DESCRIPTION OF LAND l to the Agreement dated _ 7 —� `" 1997, by and between DAVID L. STEPHENS & NELL STEPHENS, husband enc wife as Community Property, as Lessor, and SMART SMR OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a Delaware corporation, d/b/a Nextel Communications as L_ssce. The Land is described and/or depicted as follows (metes and bounds description): Commonly known as: 3902 Esplanade, Chico, CA 95973 APN: 006.400-056 County of Butte State of Caufomta; Lot 13, an ehov on that certain map entitled 'MOUNTAIN VIEW 9UBOIVI9I0N No. 1', filed in the office of the County Recorder of Butte County, California, on March 1, 1948, in Book 16 of Maps, page -13. r.' EXHIBIT A2. ^^G� DESCRIPTION OF LAND to the Agreement dated "7— d 1 . 1997, by and between DAVID L. STEPHENS & NELL STEPHENS. husband ane. wife as Community Property, as Lessor, and SMART SMR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.,a Delaware corporation, d/b/a Nextel Communications as L•ssee. ' The Land is described and/or depicted as follows (parcel map): Commonly known as: 3902 Esplanade, Chico, CA 95973 APN: 006-400-056 ....... ..... SECTION 5 T22M R)E 4T-27 •d 176, r ter n Z .......... �• %�I0.ce tol d ZD to ' H1 ........ 1<rn O .c ' ` 0, .d..[ 56 es.d I j• OT -42• . y ' r r2 I "0 t,ju'. + 'r � •+ III � � r ria•^ O26 taus -i .1 G. O ,.t Ll aye. - ad 77 a+ szrr.c y'?'; 7 tt ® G �r-•� S Qr a•" 11 � �� • � •.awe ': —..c 02 Se a.eo.c ,� � amla rI'.+oo'1 6 3 ra rv.n 3 4 AUGO. '7 B r.ee•a.'a'G r gl g • Assnaors loop. Mo r.ex n.11ms .R rw .rsa.err hwrestJ aar .� 4.r .m tn.mnnr u.. tines 0 c/ Comfy of f3{ICf 4WM ItM Y�Gv tae q(, Ir 40..•; It . _...... :> r EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES to the Agreement dated %_a 1997, by and between DAVID L. STEPHENS & NELL STEPHENS, husband and wife as Community Property, as Lessor, and SMART SMR OF CALIFORNIA. INC., a Delaware corporation, d/b/a Nextel Communications as Lessee. The Premises are described and/or depicted as follows: t ?5.98 am 4 ! 2 i 3.79 AC J, -� 3Qo2 E S PCA&IADFF !4 � Peo'Pas�O Sot x So r 4*84AC. �As6- Pg- "MI S' AcGftr �nNON� /,aowf/L —� —T- F s - •rte rowd4z i TELCO �> 4000 361.70 t"��°T �° 4Y oil- `• .,Dotes: ' I. This Exhibit may be replaced by a land surveyor the Premises once it Is received by Lessee. 2. Sethack of the Premises from the Land's boundaries shall be the distance required by the applicable governmental authorities. 3. Width of access road shall be the width required by the applicable governmental authorities, including police and fire departments. 4. The type, number and mounting positions and locations of antennas and transmission lines are illustrative only. Actual types, numbers, mounting positions may vary from what is shown above. EXHIBIT C MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CLERK: Please return this document to: SMART SMR OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Attn: Property Administrator 2180 Harvard Street, Suite 220 Sacramento, CA 95815 This Memorandum of Agreement is entered into on this day of . 199_ by and between DF.VID L. STEPHENS & NELL STEPHENS, husband and wife as Community Property, with an office, at 4192 Stone Valley Court, Chico, CA 95977, (hereinafter referred to as "Lessor") and Sb1ART SMR OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a Delaware corporation with an office at 2180 Harvarl Street, Suite 220, Sacramento, CA 95815, (hereinafter referred to as "Lessee"). 1. Lessor and Lessee entered into a Communications Site Lease Agreement ("Agreement") on the ZIA day of 1997, for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining a radio communications facility and other improvements. All of the foregoing are set forth in the Agreement. 2. The term of the Agreement is for five (5) years commencing on the date Lessee begins construction of Lessee facilities or eight,en (18) months after full execution of this Agreement, whichever first occurs ("Commencement Date"), and terminating on the fifth ann.versary of the Commencement Date with five (5) successive five (5) year periods to renew. ). The Land which is the subject of the Agreement is described in Exhibit A annexed hereto. The portion of the Land being leased to Lessee (the "Premises") is described in Exhibit B annexed hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Memorandum of Agreement as of the day and year first above written.. LESSOR: 1AVID L. STEPHENS & NE LL STEPHENS, .usband and wife as Community Propcn By: D of cC! D David L. Stephens By: Nell Stephens Title: STATE OF COUNTY OF LESSEE: SMART SMR OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a Delaware corporation, d/b/a Nextel Communications 'r 1 On . before me, 'Notary Public, personally appeared . personally known m me 'or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledgd to ie that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) Notary Public My commission expires: • STATE OF COUNTY OF l On before me, Notary Public, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknow�cdged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) Notary Public My commission expires: STATE OF COUNTY OF On , before me, Notary Public, personally appeared personally knowr to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowldgcd to I c that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person, or the entity upon behalf a3 which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) Notary Public My commission expires: 91 0 UbiquiTel Leasing Company SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR MINOR USE PERMIT' Presented By: LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC. Steve Ruppenthal, Project Manager Messeret Yilma, Zoning Specialist Jason Buckholz, Site Acquisition Specialist Hassan Mahmood, RF Engineer BUTTE COUNTY Telecommunication Antenna Placement Property Address 3902 Esplanade Chico, California 95973, INTRODUCTION The applicant, UbiquiTel Leasing Company, a Delaware limited liability company authorized to do business in the State of California, by and through their agent, LCC International (LCC) is hereby petitioning the County of Butte to grant the Minor Use Permit. UbiquiTel seeks to co -locate six (6) PCS antennas and related base station equipment on the existing 90' SpectraSite Telecommunication Facility, located at 3903 Esplanade, Chico, California. The proposed site is zoned Commercial (C-2). WHO IS UBIQUITEL UbiquiTel is a Delaware State registered company that has signed an affiliation agreement with Sprint PCS, headquartered in Kansas City Missouri. The company, headed by Donald A. Harris, former president of Comcast Cellular Communications, Inc. in Pennsylvania, is the exclusive provider of Sprint PCS digital personal communication services, generally known as PCS, to midsize and smaller markets in the Western and Midwestern United States with a total population of approximately 7.7 million residents. UbiquiTel expects to cover approximately 55% of the resident population in those markets by the end of 2001 and expects to cover approximately 63% upon completion of the build -out. A copy of the UbiquiTel's FCC license is attached as Exhibit "A". UbiquiTel will utilize all the "back office" capabilities of Sprint PCS through its affiliate relationship, such as network monitoring, billing and collections, and customer service. In addition, all of Sprint PCS' national distribution agreements with retailers such as Radio Shack, Office Max, Best Buy and Circuit City will also be available to UbiquiTel. The PCS network (using Code Division Multiple Access "CDMA") will be constructed by UbiquiTel and will be 100% compatible with Sprint PCS. Each Sprint PCS affiliate, including UbiquiTel, follows an overall national strategy that includes: • Nationwide network on a single 100% digital, 100% PCS platform • State-of-the-art CDMA technology • Unique national service offerings and pricing • Economies of scale to achieve lower costs of operation • Mass market services (national advertising and promotions) UbiquiTel is uniquely poised to bring the highest quality all digital, 100% PCS service to markets not currently served by Sprint PCS, and offer its customer., state-of-the-art wireless service at affordable prices. 1 F-1 WHAT IS PCS • PCS base stations are low-power facilities. The power of a typical PCS system is less than 20 watts per sector. In fact, this is extremely low when compared with other familiar radio systems, such as AM/FM radio and broadcast television, which operate from 5,000 — 50,000 watts. PCS broadcasts at power levels no greater than a common reading lamp. PCS is a state of the art portable telephone and paging system. PCS is competitively priced and more dependable than analog system. PCS is more private than cellular because it utilizes digital technology that makes possible many new capabilities including the ability to transmit and receive data (E-mail, conference calling, caller ID, call forwarding, and information services such as news headlines, weather forecasts, stock quotes, and also eliminates the need for a separate pager. The broadband PCS being offered by UbiquiTel is one of the newest entrants in the wireless communication services. In 1994, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) decided to allocate additional spectrum space on the radio frequency to broadband PCS. In the "Matter of Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, "GEN Docket No. 90-314, Memorandum and Order FCC94-114 (June 1994), the FCC explained that it was taking action "to foster rapid creation of a competitive market" to deliver broadband PCS services. Issuance of the new PCS licenses is intended to enhance competition "not only on price, but also on quality and the types of new products and services" that can be offered. The FCC specifically found that "rapid deployment" and wide -area coverage" of new PCS services are important and necessary for this new competition in the filed of wireless communications. HOW PCS WORKS While this site is only one of many sites in our entire market area, it is an essential link within the network. In fact, you can look at this base station facility (site) like a bulb on one of those old strings of Christmas lights. If one bulb goes out, it affects the whole string. If the site at Port -A -Storage cannot be constructed, the entire network is affected. Wireless technology, PCS in particular, is classified as a "line of sight" technology. In other words, the height and number of base station facilities needed to provide coverage depends greatly on the topography of the area to be covered. The antennas must be at a height that enables the signal to transmit with no significant obstructions, such as tall buildings or a dense stand of trees. The antenna must also be able to "see" the boundary of the next facility, in order to provide uninterrupted signal coverage between base station 4 facilities. However, the antennas can't be too high or they won't be able to provide coverage directly below, and may interfere with other surrounding sites. In that way, a PCS base station facility is like a lighthouse. For the signal light to be seen, the lighthouse must shine from a point higher than the surrounding landscape. If a nearby hill is higher than the light source, the light cannot be seen from the other side of the hill. For the light to be seen the lighthouse must either be built higher than the hill or an additional lighthouse must be built on the other side of the hill. FACILITY SITING Some people may wonder why we need this particular base station facility at this particular location. "Why here?" In general, the design objective is seamless coverage north and south on Highway 99, Highway 32 and the northwest part of Chico. Each base station facility in a PCS network, whether co -location or new build, covers a limited area. The signal is handed off from facility to facility, just like a baton in a relay race. And much the same as light from a lighthouse, to be effective and maintain coverage, a PCS signal cannot be obstructed by tall structures or topography. UbiquiTel will respond to the questions in the same order in which Butte Code Section 24-262.E is written. 7. Statement of Justification a. Includes a description of the proposed Facility, including the type of facility being requested. RESPONSE The proposed project is to co -locate six (6) PCS antennas, model RV-90- 17-02DP (Exhibit `B"), at 60' on the existing 90' lattice tower, and related base station equipment on the property located at 3902 Esplanade, Chico, CA. The base station equipment is manufactured by Lucent Technologies and is called PCS CDMA Enhanced Primary Minicell and Growth Cabinet (Exhibit "C"). The Minicell is a small, cost-effective modular base station used as the primary building block for PCS networks. Operating at 1.8 GHz, the Minicell's can be used indoors and outdoors and several pre- engineered configurations allow flexible coverage options. The growth cabinets allow for the expansion of the network when increased capacity or sectorization is required. We are proposing to install three cabinets now and possibility four in the future. n LJ 0 b. Height from the natural grade to the top of proposed Facility. RESPONSE The height from the natural grade to the top of the existing lattice tower is 90'. The height from the natural grade to the top of the proposed UbiquiTel antennas is 60'. C. Support equipment proposed. RESPONSE As stated above, the proposed support equipment is a PCS CDMA Enhanced Primary Minicell and Growth Cabinet. The Enhanced Primary Minicell is 30"W x 30"L x 60"H. The growth cabinet is 22"W x 30"W x 60"H (Exhibit "C"). d. RMEMF and wattage output data including the number of channels RESPONSE The wattage output will be 200 per sector and one channel. What are EMFs and do they pose a health risk? Whenever there is an electrical current there will also be an electromagnetic field (EMF) surrounding it. We are constantly surrounded by electrical currents. They are in household appliances such as light bulbs, computers, television, and radio. They also occur naturally in electrical phenomena that emanate from the sun, lightning bolts, and the electrical charges our bodies produce. These electromagnetic fields are produced across a wide frequency range. For example, power lines emanate frequencies at 60 Hz, while television transmits at 50 MHz to 950 MHz and PCS transmits in the 1800 MHz band. (Hz stands for hertz, or cycles per second). The following example shows the frequency spectrum and the various frequency bands. 4 wavelength (meters) 1E9 1E7 1E5 1E3 1E1 1E-1 1E-3 1E-5 E-7 R rn0 __ "�0 ,n " . ° 0 ELECTRICITY RADIO LIGHT IONIZING r f ., ' 0 3E1 3E3 3E5 3E7 3E9 3E11 3E13 3E15 frequency (hertz) (In the above picture, for e.g., 3E5 = 3 times 105 = 3,00,000 and so on) As the diagram above indicates, PCS technology operates at Radio frequencies, which are at a higher frequency than power lines. Power lines and other low frequency emissions are the focus of media attention and health studies. On the other hand, PCS operates at a lowet frequency than ionizing frequencies like X-ray machines that operate above 100,000,000,000 MHz (or 100,000 THz). While much mention has been made of EMF, there has been little to differentiate between EMFs that are harmful and EMFs that pose no threat. Recently, studies that focus on health effects regarding EMF are considering the amount of power that pushes the radio signal. A television station transmits frequencies at 500,000 watts, a radio station can transmit at 100,000 watts, and a PCS transceiver usually transmits at less than a few hundred watts. In large cities, where more transceivers are necessary to supply adequate coverage due to the shadowing of buildings, PCS transceivers may transmit as low as 10 watts. This is because the signal of any given site need only be strong enough to overlap the signal of its neighbor sites. Since PCS frequencies are much higher than the Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) of power lines, the absorption of energy by humans at PCS frequencies is substantially less that at ELF frequencies of the power lines or at VHF frequencies used for TV broadcasts. PCS frequencies are much smaller than the ionizing radiation frequencies of X-rays and gamma rays, which have been established as a health risk at high energies and long exposures. PCS facilities transmit well within the safety limits set by FCC for their frequency range and do not pose as a health risk to the surrounding exposed community. 5 0 FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency EMTs The FCC has adopted the standards set by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), and the National Council of Radiation Protection (NCRP). These standards have set the maximum permissible exposure levels and label the exposure level in terms of density, measured in milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm). It measures the amount of power that a radio frequency emits onto one square centimeter of body surface. According to the FCC exposure diagram below, the acceptable exposure for radio frequencies at 1850 MHz (PCS band) are 1.0 mW/cm2 and 5.0 mW/cm2 foreg, neral public and occupational cases respectively. "The rationale takes into consideration that the extremely short wavelengths do not penetrate very deep into the body tissues"'. Because these guidelines are based upon the same limits as those in the IEEE/ANSI and NCRP guidelines, they also include safety factors of 10 and 50 for occupational and general public scenarios respectively from what is believed to be a health risk. General public/uncontrolled exposure limits apply in cases where the general public may be exposed. Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply in cases where persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and are fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. OMNI I III III 0 • (The above figure has been adapted from the FCC document — OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, Aug 1997, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio frequency Electromagnetic Fields") RF Exposure Compliance of a Typical PCS Cell Site Because of the nature of frequencies above the 1600 MHz level, they are line of sight propagations. This means that you have to be directly in the path of the beam to be exposed to the full power of the transmission. Antennas are directed so they radiate most of the energy away from buildings towards the horizon, at another antenna. Also, the further you move away from the transmitting antenna, the less powerful the power density becomes. This decrease in power is equated by power density decreasing as the inverse square of the distance. Most transmitters are placed on a tower/monopole or a tall building. Measurements taken for a 145 foot tower, with 22 transmitters radiating 100 watts each (2200 total effective radiated power), were 0.04094 mW/cm2. Densities at ground level easily fall within the standards for the general population, put forth by ANSI2. Data submitted to the FCC showed that exposure from a 45 meter tower was hardly more than typical background levels. Measurements taken at the bottom of a tower, operating at 100 watts per channel, 96 channels, omni -directional collinear arrays, were 0.002 mW/cm2 per channel3. This analysis reported on a worst case scenario, so it assumed that the antenna focus was straight down. Building attenuation caused density exposures to be even lower. The same distances from an antenna on the outside, as in the inside, are as much as 10 to 100 times lower depending on the building construction. Measurements taken inside nearby buildings from the same tower yield levels between 0.0002 mW/cm2 and 0.00002 mW/cm2. Rooms directly below and to the rear of the antenna face are even lower (IEEE May 1992). Portable cellular phones also fall under the regulation of the FCC/ANSI C95.1-1992 standard [18]. According to an IEEE article dated December 1994, "cellular phones operating at 0.6 watts, exposed the head to 0.86 mW/cm2, while lower extremities received 0.57 mW/cm2". Transmission power levels for PCS antennas are very low. In January 1993, the FCC reported: "Measurements that have been made around typical cellular base stations have shown that ground -level power densities are well below limits recommended by currently accepted RF (radio frequency) and microwave safety standards." Eight prominent researchers and agencies researched, studied, and continue to study the effects from radio frequencies in the PCS industry. Today, there is no data establishing a correlation between radio wave transmissions at these power levels with any adverse health effects; There has been much discussion recently about electromagnetic fields (EMF) and alleged health affects associated with them. The vast majority of these reports are associated with the EMF resulting from high power electric utility transmission lines. The following 7 • 0 paragraphs detail the differences between transmission lines and Personal Communication Services (PCS) facility electromagnetic fields. It is important to note that any electronic device or transmission facility generates electromagnetic fields. Items such as lamps, power lines, stereos, garage door openers, CB radios, etc. generate these fields. There are two main properties, which distinguish these fields. They are the strength of the fields, which is associated with the amount of electricity going through the device, and the frequency of the fields. A PCS transmission facility, by design, transmits very low power, which results in weak electromagnetic fields. Low power is used at these facilities due to the nature of a PCS network. Each PCS base station is designed to provide service to only a small geographic area, typically about a 2 to 3 mile radius. Beyond this distance, another PCS base station in the network provides service. Also, the frequency of the fields used at a PCS facility is much different from that used in high power electric utility transmission lines. A technical analysis of a generic PCS transmission facility is depicted in Appendix A. The analysis is presented for a relatively short structure of 45'; for taller structures the exposure would be significantly lower. Appendix A shows that . the "worst case" electromagnetic field density at the base of a 45' tower is about 1.5 times weaker than the standard adopted by the Federal Communications Commission governing PCS operation. As a point of comparison, manufacturers of microwave ovens (these ovens operate at generally a similar frequency to PCS transmitters) are required to design their products such that the field strength "leaking" out does not exceed 1.0 mW/cm2 at a distance of 5 cm from the oven's surface. The "worst case" analysis for the PCS facility is still much lower than the permissible guidelines governing microwave ovens. The "average case" analysis is again a 100 times below the acceptable levels for microwave ovens. Conclusion: The PCS cell site applied for is well within the safety region for exposure to humans. Even in the worst-case scenario with the antennas pointing straight down at the tower base and with full power, it easily meets the FCC limit for exposure to general public. 8 1�1 References: • 1 The American Radio Relay League, Now You're Talking!, 2"d edition, pg. 8. s Denny & Associates, PC, Engineering Exhibit: Human Exposure to Radio -Frequency Emissions, Kansas City, Missouri; August 17, 1995 ' IEEE, Human Exposure to RF Emissions from Cellular Radio Base Station Antennas, May 1992. " IEEE, Current and SAR Induced in a Human Head Model by the Electromagnetic Fields Irradiated from a Cellular Phone, vol. 42, no. 12, December 1994. 6 • • Appendix A: Typical PCS Field Density "Worst Case" Analysis Conditions for "Worst Case" Analysis Where; -All available transmitter power is utilized -The antennas are pointing straight down at the base of the tower Power Density = (P * s * c * A * r) / (4 * pi * R2) P = Transmitted Effective Radiated Power of each Carrier (600 Watts) s = Number of Sectors (3) c = Number of carriers per sector (2) A = Antenna Gain Factor (1.64) r = Ground Reflection Factor (2.56) pi = 3.14 R = Distance to the Antennas at tower base (45' = 1459 cm) Substituting in these numbers; Power Density = 0.64 milliWatts/cm2 Comparing to FCC limits for general population of 1.0 milliWatts/cm2 1.0 milliWatts/cm2 / 0.64 milliWatts/cm2 = 1.55 (i.e. approximately 1.5) Conclusion: It is seen that even in the worst scenario, with maximum power transmitted, with 2 carriers and the antenna pointing, at the base of the tower, the RF exposure at the worst location at the base of the tower, is still 1.5 times below that allowed by the FCC for the more stringent general public exposure limit. (It should be noted that this, worst case scenario is never implemented, since pointing the antennas at the tower base would drastically reduce the coverage area of the cell site). Additional information pertaining to PCS Antenna Safety is attached as Exhibit "D" 10 0 e. Horizontal and vertical location coordinates. RESPONSE LAT (NAD 27): 039-47-28 & LAN (NAD 27): 121-53-36 8. Proposed elevations of the structure and any accessory buildings, including building height and other physical dimensions, drawn to graphic scale. RESPONSE Please see site plan page Z-2. 9. Visual impact assessment, photo montages, mock-ups as determined by the Director of Development Services or Planning Commission. The assessment shall identify any proposed trimming of vegetation that will be required for the normal operation of the Facility. Stealth technology is encouraged. RESPONSE Please see attached photos and photosims as Exhibit "E". The original photos are marked "P" and the rendered versions are marked "R". 10. Mock-ups required (may be required at any time during the processing of the permit. RESPONSE See response to number 9 and Exhibit "E". 11. A discussion of and supporting information regarding the alternative site selection of at least a minimum of three to four sites, if available,. including colocation opportunities, and a statement as to why these alternative sites and/or colocation opportunities were rejected. RESPONSE While this site is only one of many sites in our entire market area, it is an essential link within the network. In fact, you can look at this site like a bulb on one of those old strings of Christmas lights. If one bulb goes out, it affects the whole string. As you can see in the propagation maps (Exhibit F) the first map shows a gap in coverage amongst the sites and the second map, now with the proposed site in place, fills in that gap giving seamless coverage to the area. 11 Wireless technology, PCS in particular, is classified as a "line of sight" technology. In other words, the height and number of base station facilities needed to provide coverage depends greatly on the topography of the area to be covered. The antennas must be at a height that enables the signal to transmit with no significant obstructions, such as tall buildings or a dense strand of trees. The antenna must also be able to "see" the boundary of the next facility, in order to provide uninterrupted signal coverage between base station facilities. However, the antennas can't be too high or they won't be able to provide coverage directly below, and may interfere with other surrounding sites. Each base station facility in a PCS network, whether co -location or new build, covers a limited area. The signal is handed off from facility to facility, just like a baton in a relay race. And much the same as light from a lighthouse, to be effective and maintain coverage, a PCS signal cannot be obstructed by tall structures or topography. With the tower already existing and being within the search ring area, there was no need to pursue any other facility. 12. A complete service area map showing the entire wireless communications network of the provider's twenty miles in all directions from the proposed site for the time period from the filing of the application to twelve (12) months from the filing of the application, for the purpose of visually aiding cumulative environmental analysis, with and without the proposed Facility or Facilities, showing all hand-off sites within the above specified area. RESPONSE See attached Exhibit "G". 13. A graphic depiction of the search ring and all other technical criteria used in determining the proposed Facility location. RESPONSE See attached Exhibit "H". 14. Documentation which identifies failure characteristics of the Facility structure or tower and demonstrates that the site and setbacks are of adequate size to contain falling debris. 12 0 0 RESPONSE A copy of the structural report completed by C. K. Allen, Jr., Structural Engineer is attached as Exhibit "I". 15. Written evidence demonstrating that the selected Facility structure or tower design is as visually unobtrusive as possible, given technical and engineering considerations, which indicate what type of facility is required to provide reasonably effective service and also the best technology and/or construction available to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness. The use of best available technology and/or construction to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness is mandatory. RESPONSE UbiquiTel believes that utilizing the existing structure would be less obtrusive than proposing to construct a new tower within the general area. As the photos (Exhibit "E") show, the addition of six (6) antennas to the existing tower will not make this structure any more obtrusive. 16. Applicants which operate common carrier facilities (specifically, but not limited to cellular, PCS, SMR and paging service licensees of the FCC) shall provide written evidence that the applicant has provided notice to all FCC licensed wireless communication service carriers operating within the County of Butte of the plans to develop the site. RESPONSE Copies of the certified letters are attached as Exhibit "J". 17. Evidence of a valid, current operating license or construction permit from the FCC or, if the applicant is not a wireless communications service provider, a user operating agreement for each and every such provider to which the applicant intends to rent space on the proposed Facility. RESPONSE A copy of UbiquiTel's FCC license is attached as Exhibit "A". The SpectraSite FAA Registration letter is attached as Exhibit "K". 18. A report, signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer licensed by the FCC, prepared pursuant to FCC OET 65, stating whether the maximum radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic radiation (RF/EMF) to be emitted by the proposed Facility, taking into account all other Facilities, both existing and known future 13 Facilities, at the proposed site and adjacent properties, conforms to safety standards adopted by the FCC, if applicable. The reports prepared for the Facilities shall conform to the reporting requirements set by the County and FCC OET 65 human exposure standards. The report shall also conform to the reporting requirements set by the County and FCC OET 65 human exposure standards. The report shall also analyze the evidence provided in support of the evidence provided in support of the proposed Facility location, height and radiated power, frequency, the number of channels, and all other related data and present alternatives for the location, height and radiated power, pursuant to the requirements of this section. If the proposed Facility exceeds FCC OET 65 human exposure standards, applicant shall also provide additional comprehensive technical and planning information regarding how the applicant shall protect all persons from such excessive exposure consistent with all Federal and State requirements, and any additional County requirements. RESPONSE A copy of the Scinetics Engineering Report is attached as Exhibit "U". The report concludes that the power densities emitted by the proposed PCS radio antennas are many orders of magnitude below the health standards adopted or proposed in the United State and any health standard used anywhere in the world. 19. Landscaping and painting plans for the completed project. RESPONSE As you can see from photos (Exhibit "E") landscaping is not applicable to the site, because we will be located within the existing compound behind a slated fence. The antennas will be painted to match the color of the tower. 20. Projects in Agricultural Zones (A-5 through A-160) shall, prior to submitting an application for a proposed Facility, submit a site plan of the proposed Facility to the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner for comment and send a notification letter to all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County informing them of the proposed site location and tower height. No hearing on an application for a proposed facility in any agricultural zone will be scheduled, nor shall any administrative Permit for any such facility be issued without proof that the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner and all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County have been notified, as specified, as specified herein. RESPONSE This site is located in the Commercial (C-2) zone, which makes it not applicable. 14 • 21. All applications for Facilities that are proposed to be located within the boundaries of any Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan or Airport Area of Influence, as adopted or designated from time to time by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission, shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division, and a copy submitted to the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission for review regarding consistency with adopted Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plans and for recommendations addressing potential impacts to air navigation within the Airport Area of Influence. RESPONSE This is not applicable since the Site exists and has already been approved under Permit No. UP 98-04. CONSLUSION UbiquiTel respectfully requests that the County of Butte approve its application for a Minor Use Permit to co -locate six (6) PCS antennas and related base station equipment on the existing 90' lattice tower. 15 Exhibit "A" UbiquiTel's FCC License Jd.l. LU. 2UUU _ G • i rt.1i `. t 1 N: . t,S i:` GONtrvy�� • United St:1teS or 1C:1r c, „Pr J , Fedmil CommunicatiorrS Ornrni;itOn .•rel C-�C�7 x•I RADIO STATIO\r AUTHORIZATION IOA4 55 Commercial .fobilc Radio sen'rcci Person:il Communic:trions SCrvicc - fir'o:td!Jalld WIREL�-SSCC. L.P. Call ji�a KNLF208_ 9221 Ward Parkway M a rk et: M004 Kansas City. N10 64114 SAN PRANCISCOOAKLANDSAN JOSE Charnel Tock.- A File vum5er ' 00005 -CW -L-95 The licensee ltereeC is authorized, for the pcciod indicated, to construct and operate ratio trarsnu:;in; facilities in accordance with the terms and conditions hercinaher described. This authorization 1; subject t0 G1c pro.isions of the Comrrlunicadons Act of 1934, as amended, subsequent Acts of Congress. international Lrc-16es and a,rccmems to ..hick the Unieed States is a si�meory, and all pertinent rules and regulations of Lhe Fedcral Communications Commission. containci in die Tide 47 of the U.S. Code of Fcdcral Rcgvla6ons. r Initial Grant Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 23, 1995 Five -dear Build Out Dace . . . . . ,June 23, 2000 Expiration Date . . . , . . . , , , . . . . . . . . . . . ... June 23, 2005 CO`TJ;T10v_ Pursulnt 10 r_c:;on :09(h) of the Corrvittmcations .pct of 1931, a; amcndeC. (47 U.S.C. 3 3C);�1)• L�,s ltccr,;e is sub;ect 10 the rol;O"ir.g :n odttions: This license docs not vest in dte licensee ar.v rig`tt to oPcra:e a st,::ioit nor anv right in the use of hcquencics bevond the term thereof nor in any other manner than audio; ized herein, N-itncr 'WS license nor the right --anted dtercunder shall be assigned or Othen.isc ;ransferrsd in .iotltion of the - Cor municauo,ts Act Of 193.4, as amcnaed (47 U.S.C. § 151, ct sed.). Tlus license is subjec: in ternts to die right of use or control conferred by Sccuon 706 of Ne Communications -pct or 19;1, as afncnCed (_7 U.S. C. � 606). Conditions continued on Pagc 2. WAW—ER'S • No waivers assecial_d %kith dtis audtorinticio. !Sil:e Ouse. .lull, 23. l9')5 FCC Farm 4_3a r Pags ! o. 2 ��•a. 4U.:UUu� Q, JiA•A VVIRELESSCO, L.P. CONDITIONS: TIIis authoriz:tiou is subject to dr: ;ondition :h:!:, in the cvcn., that SystcItrs uirn; rtt_ Js ;canted herein are audioracd In ir.:Idjaccnt !orcign err':ory (Canad:v'vni;cd f:Iturc coordrnation of ani bast statwn tra.Isn:itt_rS -ithilt 72 km (.i miles) of the Unitcd S:arcs/Canala bo;dcr SIt:III be required to eliminate atw harmful intcr,crcnee to Operations ill clic adjacent foreign Iemto and to ensure cantinuauce orequU access to UIc frequencies by both countries. This auttronzation is subject to the condition that Ilse remaining balance of the winning Sid amount %,ill be paid in accordance with Part I of the Commission's rules, 17 C.F.R. Part I. Issue Date: Juni: 23, 1993 FCC Form J6;a u000 5-CVV-L-9. Paac 2 of 2 Exhibit "B" Antenna Cl EMS . OptiRangeT" 6► rre[es.s Rf9O-l7-XXDP 2.75" Azimuth Beamwidth Elevation Beamwidth Gain Polarization Front -to -Back Ratio Electrical Downtilt Options VSWR Connectors Power Handling Passive Intermodulation Lightning Protection Model Number IN RF CONNECTOR Electrical 90° 6° 16.5 dBi (14.4 dBd) Vertical > 25 dB (> 30 dB Typ.) 0°, 2°, 4°, 6° 1.35:1 Max 1; 7-16 DIN (female) 250 Watts CW <_ -147 dBc [2x20W (+43 dBm)) Chassis Ground Description Standard Mount (Supp lie Swivel Mount Mechanical Downtilt Kits Cluster Mount Kits —U -Bolt Cluster Mount Kit Steel Band Mount sents a series of products. 770• See mounti 10 Mechanical 900 beamwidth 16.5 dBi gain Vertical Polarization 56 inch Dimensions (L x W x D) ; 56in x 8in x 2.75in (142 cm x 20.3 cm x 7.0 cm) Rated Wind Velocity i 150 mph (241 km/hr) Equivalent Flat Plate Area Front Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 kph) ' 3.1ft7 (.29 m7) 90 lbs (400 N) Side Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 kph) 131 lbs (139 N) Weight 18 lbs (8.2 kg) Note: Patent Pending and US Patent number 5, 757, 246. Values and patterns are representative and variations may occur. Specifications may change without notice due to continuous product enhancements. Digitized pattern data is available from the factory or via the web site www.emswireless.com and reflect all updates. .... 270- so- Elevation 70• Comments Mounts to Wall or 1.5 inch to 5.0 inch_ O.D. Pole (3.8 cm to 12.7 cm) Mounting kit.providing azimuth adjustment. 0° -10° or 0° - 15° Mechanical Downtilt 3 antennas 120° apart or 2 antennas180° apart 3 antennas, 120' apart , 4.55"O,D,-pole. Pole diameters 7.5" - 45" ons section for specific model number. 270- 270- 90• Azimuth 90 - Elevation 0° Downtilt 90Elevation 2° Downtilt 90 - Elevation 4° Downtilt 90• Elevation 6° Downtilt Exhibit 66C" Lucent Cabinets Lucent Technologies Bell Labs Innovations PCS CDMA Enhanced Primary Minicell and Growth Cabinet Technical Specifications Lucent Technologies' Personal Communications Services (PCS) Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) Minicell'is a small, cost-effective modular base station used as the primary building block for PCS networks. Operating at 1.8 GHz, these Minicells can be used indoors or outdoors and several pre-engineered configurations allow flexible coverage options. Growth cabinets expand the network when increased capacity or sectorization is required. PCS CDMA Minicell and Growth Cabinet Parameter Specification* General Spectrum Filter Blocks Digital Cellular Switch Handoff Speed Vocoder Support Cell Site Installation Cell Site Configurations Cell Site Synchronization Cell Site Alarms Cell Site Diagnostics Enhanced Primary Cabinet Carriers RF Train Antenna Support CDMA Clusters Channels Channel Units Expanded capacity Channel Unit (ECU) Growth Cabinet(s) Carriers RF Train CDMA Clusters Channels Channel Units 2nd Carrier Antenna Support 3rd to 6th Carrier Antenna Support Expanded capacity Channel Unit (ECU) Power Input Power IndoorlOutdoor Outdoor Only RF Output Power Per Standard CDMA Transmit Unit (CTU) Per High Power CDMA Transmit Unit (HPCTU) Backup Power Facilities Connections Types T1 or E1/CEPT • 1.8 GHz PCS A, B, C, D, E or F Blocks 5ESSI-2000 Switch Up to 65 MPH soft handoff (cell radius at least 2500' [762.5m]) Both 8 Kbps (includes Enhanced Variable Rate Coder [EVRC] . support) & 13 Kbps Indoor/Outdoor Omni/1, 2, 3 or 6 Sector Global Positioning System (GPS) Reference Internal & User Definable Alarm Capability (Remote Monitoring) Integrated Diagnostic Capability (Remote Monitoring) Up to 3 carriers (one carrier/sector or 3 -carrier Omni) Three Duplex (each train contains Transmit & Diversity Receive) Duplex Filter Configuration (2 Antenna/Sector) Up to three Supports 40 physical channels per cluster Up to four per CDMA cluster 10 Physical Channels at 8Kbps (supports EVRC) or 13Kbps Provides an additional carrier per sector Adds 1 Transmit/Sector & uses Enhanced Primary's diversity receive RF trains , Up to three per cabinet Supports 40 physical channels per cluster Up to four per CDMA cluster Uses existing Enhanced Primary Duplex Filters (No additional Antenna/Sector) Simplex Filter Configuration (1 Additional Antenna/Sector/Carrier) 10 Physical Channels at 8Kbps (supports EVRC) or 13Kbps +24V DC 240V AC 8 watts @ Antenna Interface 16 watts @ Antenna Interface Both support up to 200mW digital terminals at 1.8 GHz Optional Battery or Generator Backup cabinets Upto6 • . PCS CDMA Minicell and Growth Cabinet (continued) Parameter Specification Physical (continued) Cabinet (Outdoor) Dimensions Growth Cabinet(s) (Outdoor) Enhanced Primary Cabinet 30"W x 30"L x 60"H (Indoor/Outdoor) (76.2cm x 76.2cm x 152.4cm) Growth Cabinet(s) 22"W x 30% x 60" H (Indoor/Outdoor) (55.9cm x 76.2cm x 152.4cm) 66EC Primary Power Cabinet 31 "W x 30"L x 66" H —40° to +115° F(-40* to +46° C) (78.7cm x 76.2cm x 167.6cm) 60C Primary Power Cabinet 31 "W x 30"L x 60"H (78.7cm x 76.2cm x 152.4cm) 60EC Battery Backup Cabinet 31 "W x 30"L x 60" H +41 o to +104* F (+5° to +40° C) (78.7cm x 76.2cm x 152.4cm) 60C Battery Backup Cabinet 31 "W x 30"L x 60"H (78.7cm x 76.2cm x 152.4cm) 60C Generator Backup Cabinet 31 "W x 30% x 60"H (78.7cm x 76.2cm x 152.4cm) CPS4024 (H569-424) 32.25"W x 19.75"L x 84"H Indoor Power Frame (81.9cm x 50.2cm x 213.4cm) Ambient Operating Temperature Range Enhanced Primary —40° to +126° F (-40° to +52° C) Cabinet (Outdoor) Growth Cabinet(s) (Outdoor) —40° to +126° F (-40° to +52° C) 66EC Primary Power Cabinet —40° to +115* F (-400 to +46° C) 60C Primary Power Cabinet —40° to +115* F (-40° to +46° C) 60EC Battery Backup Cabinet —400 to +115* F (-40° to +46° C) 60C Battery Backup Cabinet —400 to +115° F(-40* to +46° C) 60C Generator Backup Cabinet —40° to +115° F(-40* to +46° C) CPS4024 (H569-424) Indoor —400 to +149° F (-40° to +65° C) Power Frame Enhanced Primary Cabinet (Indoor) +41 * to +104° F (+5° to +40° C) Growth Cabinet(s) (Indoor) +41 o to +104* F (+5° to +40° C) Regulatory Air Interface Standards Safety/Regulatory Bellcore Application Code ANSI J -STD -008 Upbanded IS -95A (cdmaOne") Meets U.S. FCC Part 15 & Part 24 Requirements ULI 1950, 3rd Edition CSA C22.2 #234 UL 50 — Type 311 Cabinets meet elements of GR 487 -CORE & GR 63 -CORE Enhanced Primary Cabinet WP Growth Cabinet WK Third Carrier Growth Cabinet When you want to talk wireless, give us a call. Our one -network solution offers you a total communications system. With Lucent Technologies' vast experience, dedication to customer satisfaction, and continuous search for innovations through Our Bell Laboratories, we provide advanced wireless products that can move your network seamlessly into the next generation. For more information on Lucent Technologies wireless communications, please contact your Lucent Technologies Account Representative or call: 800-344-0223 x7020 (United States) 314-536-1886 (outside United States). Visit our web site at http://www.lLlcetit.com 5ESS is a registered trademark of Lucent Technologies Inc. edmaOne is a trademark of the CDMA Development Group (CDG). 'UL is a registered trademark of Underwriters Laboratories. * Unless otherwise stated, specifications are applicable to both indoor & outdoor cabinet models. This document is for planning purposes only and is not intended to modify or supplement any specifications or warranties relating to these products or services. Copyright © 1998 Lucent Technologies Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. Lucent Technologies Inc. AMPS/PCS Messaging 5010TS \'AK 9/98 Lucent Technologies Bell Labs Innovations 0 PCS CDMA Minicell and Growth Cabinet (continued) Parameter Installation & Maintenance Installation & Mounting Indoor Outdoor Access Maintenance Cabinet Access Cell Upgrade Options Compatibility Environmental Storage Temperature Outdoor Cabinet Indoor Cabinet Specification* Raised Floor or non -raised floor environment Rooftop or Streetside (slab) mountable Front & Back Front only for most routine maintenance 1.9 Maintenance action per year per cell Field upgrade options available Compatible with Lucent Technologies Mobile Switching Center (MSC) —40° to +158° F (-40° to +70' C) +32° to +158° F (0° to +70° C) Humidity Indoor Cabinet (operating) 5% to 85% RH (storage) 0% to 95% RH Outdoor Cabinet (operating and storage) 0% to 100% RH Operating Altitude Physical Weight (Fully Loaded) Enhanced Primary Cabinet Growth Cabinet 66EC Primary Power Cabinet 60C Primary Power Cabinet 60EC Battery Backup Cabinet 60C Battery Backup Cabinet 60C Generator Backup Cabinet CP54024 (H569-424) Indoor Power Frame 197 feet (60m) below to 10,000 feet (3,050m) above sea level. 8501b. (385.9kg) 6001b. (272kg) 16001b. (726.4kg) 11001b. (499.4kg) 26001b. (1180.4kg) 26001b. (1180.4kg) 7001b. (317.8kg) 21601b. (980.6kg) • Lucent Technologies Bell Labs Innovations 66EC-PWR Power Cabinet Completely Integrated System, Solution Designed to Provide a Relia3l.e, Uninterrupted DC Power Source. (GF.C-PI•VR Power t"abhwt — Ikiik View Gol?c;-I'll'R Ilmir r:�rbiuii — l roiri 1'iin• The 66l'.C-I'WR 1'rnvcr Cabinet fill - PCS ONVII\ waS cfc'si;',nc)I lu Irl a I)ow(r iafrinel s)rluliun frrr ciislun)crs seek m; Irallcry call;ldly lu'y))nrl av11a1 iS )rff•_red will) II)c 60(:-I'Wl\ 1')nver Caliincl. Whine II)c 661X idds )nary n(•w f_a- 1111'CS, IIIC cal)incl I)aS lrCrn ilCsiglIC-1 Sir II1a1 i))Sllillalinn will Ire CSScnlially dlL' Same as 111,11 fill' Hit, 00(:. A Cun)lr,uiso n of Ill(' 14Vrr l)()swclr Sululirr)IS iS Slursv I in 111C hdlosvin;o lallrlc. 66EC-PWR 60CPWR Number Battery 2 1 Shelves: Maximum Number 4 2 24V Battery Strings: Enhanced Cooling Yes No in Battery Compartment: Cabinet Height: 66" 6J" Footprint: 31 "w x 30"d 31 "w x 30"d Placement of Same Sade Mounting Holes: Grounding: Same Same Product Overview The 661-7.-PWR 1'114V1'I' (:.1111111'1 will providt' ills Io 6 kW of 241V Iro111 I 2115/2110 volt M.: i11llul soufcc. The Primary 1'o%wUf (:ahillcl C,1n himsc 1111 lo Iwo CPS I,owt'f shclVUs ctlriilllx•d tvilll 111, l0 Io high cfficic11cy 24 vols, 27 amp I11n� in, Swi(chnn)dt' 1'cclilicrs in all invironnlcnlally Sl•alt'll UICClroniCS cahi- n01. TI IL' ca14110 call IIu11Sc ills Io iuul' 24V Slrillgs uI h,11lUrics, IuvVidin"' 1111 In 5 IIIrIII:S of 11,1110)! Ics0rvc al 2 kW load. The (TS AI,1rn1 ft' Control Unil Ilfnvidcs nurnilorin� and 011111)111 of IhC I)owt'l' systcnl, alarm sil;11,11 access, and visual L.I.I) indiialors. 11 ,Ilso has a Ilruvision for thermal 111011ilorin" of IIIc IWIlCI'Il'S. 'I'lic SySlcnl aulonlalically adjusts IIIc 1111,11 volta!�c lu•ovidcd by IIIc rcClificrs aS M I'MI lllrll of hallcf! tc111110rMlurc. A lot! Voll,1r disconnccl (I.VI)) iil'Cuil IllcvcnlS Ills haucry CCII volla_C Ironl f,1llin!� h01ow I .75 volls/icll (o) M Cus1011lcf sUlcclUd va111C) incl Inrssihly d,1111M;;in IIIc h,1IlCricS. 'I'll(- 22 posilio11 UC. Di<U'ihnlion I',11101 is c(lllilll+cll Willi iircuil hri,1kcrs (21 Ilosilio11s ovailal,lc) ,111d IIIc I.VI). Rc.LtUl,1lUd UC I)lltycr anti I1MVt'f GINII(l ala)11IS 11V iahlCil dirccdy to the,1dj,1ccnl PCS Milli-CCII cyllilMICIII iahincl. I.uccnl Tccllltolnlgics' palvillcd inulin SySlcnl ntainlii11S the cquipillcnl insidc the cahi11Uls wilhill ils Safc nlrcralill Ic11llrcf,11111V I'MigIC wilhuul Iht' use (11, oulsidc air. TIliS illnuv,tlivc IICSi"II kccllS Iwatcr, dust, and I,IIIIulMnls o111 ul IhC cicilronicS aria, IhcfUhy Irrcvc11lilt condUnsalion ill the cahillcl and Co111,111I- ination and Corrosion oI Clccu'onii cyuiplilcnl. The 11,1IIcry Conlll,1rl111c11I ulilins Luccnl 'I't'i1111olo-ics' 1:11hallicd Cousin!, sysicrtl 10 UliltiUliM hallC)y lc11,llCra)lu'C 111d sigililicanlly irllllrovc h,1llcry lift'. Tht. 1:1111,1nccd C:u,rlinl SYSIi111 t•v,1s dCSi"11Ud to nlaimain hallcry lUnl1wralurc nU,1r anlhicnl Icullx ral11fc twilllmll the use oI air iondilio11in0. Wills 111111MICT•ll Cooling, cuslonlc's Call approxilnalcly do11hlc 11.1110ry life ovcr Iradilional 11lclllods of passive inulitl The sysic11t also I1ro- vidcs fur adcllu,1lc hydrlr•,Cn vcnlilalilln Iu I1rUv0111 IIIc build u11 01 g.lsscs in IIIc 11,11ICry iu11ll1arl111cnl, nict'li11" b01II I:clliorc 11111 UI.. f'(1161cntcnls. TIIis resulls in a rCliahlU, lulw 11Iai1110naucc, and S,11c Soluliou. In dic evens of all AC: faihn'0, the h,1Ucf- ics supply IIIc DC Ilutvcr In IhC PCS IN/lilli-CLII Cy11iI1n1Cn1. TIIC SySlcnl is a II'lll' 11ninlCrr1111lihIC Ilorvcr SySICIII. Side View Quality Construction lion The 061-.-C 1'ot•Vcr CahinUl is rI1a11111ai- t11rcd al LlRVIIl TCchnulul; CS' 111a11uI;iC- l11rin i,1cilily ill Unlalla, Vchraska. I;WII nl,1nulailurinL Mid hill Lahuralurics dUsion c11c,inccring are ro-islcrcd to ISO 911111, Ill'ovidin" Ilniuntrlllcll In'oicssc which resull in 0onsislcnlly Iligh IIu111i y I1fudUCIS and ScrviicS. I'hc hcavy-duly 0ahiucl is nl:ulufailnr_d With all il,rru;inll fcsiSla11l nlalcriJIS. C)nc-ci�hlh iocll (hick hcavy-duly alU 111:1111111 is IIScll for Illi cahi1101 hU,tIV 11 d IIIc nlajoril! Ill c,1l,illo conllloncnts. Ill'ti' III,1ICI'I,11S 4VCfl' SCICCIt'll hl'l',1IISI' of lhcir slfcn lli, d11rahility, iifc rrsisl,1ni . CI11'1usio11 fcsisl,1nOC, 311d Ilial IrtnSlir charaClinsllcs lyl iCh arc CSSc111411 for uuldour 1I,I11ii,1liu1tS. A ImlycSl01' �Icr Mains Iinish is cicilfuSI'lliially app'i0d to all GIN110 SuflaiiS to Ilfullllii all cxlfclncly durahlc, hill I111,11ily finish 01111 allrailivc allllt';I f,llli l'. Drsi�ncd sl,rcifically fu) IIIc ouldoo) I11anl t'11viron11,U111, 1110 661iC: h)%-VL'I' Cahincl cniloStlfCS olliinlizc kcal Iranrt fir, C11viru1111ti•nlMl lu'MCClion. Mill c,1S0 of ilISI111,16oll 111d nlainlcnanic. I:JL'5 Cahi11Cl is MSScnll110d, C011Il11cicly wi)ca, alld SySlcnl ICSICd ,11 the lallol'y In Irrovidc 1110 11i-llcsl swildards of I111,11iiy and ilUick, Irflnhlc flVL' i11S1,11I Boll. The iallinclS arc iailo)y cfluilllu•d WWI I,utvt'r dislrihulion Ind alarm iahlill." i11cludin a Cahincl Sccurily syslcnl which sends ,1 rcnlolc al,1rni to a Cenral IniMlion ill the cv0nl of Un,111111orin•111 Cnlry. Tilt' dC1orS arc oillilllx'd will) 216-lyllc locking IncOhanisnls M11d Can he Iladlockcd for added scculily. I.AI Clll TiihlIOI01"iiS' lll)ailiVC Mid I'll"g('d iahincl SySlclnS arc tlCl/loyid Ihruul"houl IItU world in 11,11-sh c11vin'll- nl0nls such as Sandi Avabi,1, Soulhcaa Asia, S011111wesl U11ilcd SWIL's, So1111, and C0111ral Aincrica, and Canada. SUCCCSSIIII ullUfalion in Ihcsc cline,1lc-. I1lovidt's ICSliunuly to the 1.11IMS111CSS of IIIc dcsil-ns and ovcr,1ll rcliahilily I.1 Lui('nl TcilIII0IA ;icS' iahi11Ut S)'SlcUlti 1 Side View Quality Construction lion The 061-.-C 1'ot•Vcr CahinUl is rI1a11111ai- t11rcd al LlRVIIl TCchnulul; CS' 111a11uI;iC- l11rin i,1cilily ill Unlalla, Vchraska. I;WII nl,1nulailurinL Mid hill Lahuralurics dUsion c11c,inccring are ro-islcrcd to ISO 911111, Ill'ovidin" Ilniuntrlllcll In'oicssc which resull in 0onsislcnlly Iligh IIu111i y I1fudUCIS and ScrviicS. I'hc hcavy-duly 0ahiucl is nl:ulufailnr_d With all il,rru;inll fcsiSla11l nlalcriJIS. C)nc-ci�hlh iocll (hick hcavy-duly alU 111:1111111 is IIScll for Illi cahi1101 hU,tIV 11 d IIIc nlajoril! Ill c,1l,illo conllloncnts. Ill'ti' III,1ICI'I,11S 4VCfl' SCICCIt'll hl'l',1IISI' of lhcir slfcn lli, d11rahility, iifc rrsisl,1ni . CI11'1usio11 fcsisl,1nOC, 311d Ilial IrtnSlir charaClinsllcs lyl iCh arc CSSc111411 for uuldour 1I,I11ii,1liu1tS. A ImlycSl01' �Icr Mains Iinish is cicilfuSI'lliially app'i0d to all GIN110 SuflaiiS to Ilfullllii all cxlfclncly durahlc, hill I111,11ily finish 01111 allrailivc allllt';I f,llli l'. Drsi�ncd sl,rcifically fu) IIIc ouldoo) I11anl t'11viron11,U111, 1110 661iC: h)%-VL'I' Cahincl cniloStlfCS olliinlizc kcal Iranrt fir, C11viru1111ti•nlMl lu'MCClion. Mill c,1S0 of ilISI111,16oll 111d nlainlcnanic. I:JL'5 Cahi11Cl is MSScnll110d, C011Il11cicly wi)ca, alld SySlcnl ICSICd ,11 the lallol'y In Irrovidc 1110 11i-llcsl swildards of I111,11iiy and ilUick, Irflnhlc flVL' i11S1,11I Boll. The iallinclS arc iailo)y cfluilllu•d WWI I,utvt'r dislrihulion Ind alarm iahlill." i11cludin a Cahincl Sccurily syslcnl which sends ,1 rcnlolc al,1rni to a Cenral IniMlion ill the cv0nl of Un,111111orin•111 Cnlry. Tilt' dC1orS arc oillilllx'd will) 216-lyllc locking IncOhanisnls M11d Can he Iladlockcd for added scculily. I.AI Clll TiihlIOI01"iiS' lll)ailiVC Mid I'll"g('d iahincl SySlclnS arc tlCl/loyid Ihruul"houl IItU world in 11,11-sh c11vin'll- nl0nls such as Sandi Avabi,1, Soulhcaa Asia, S011111wesl U11ilcd SWIL's, So1111, and C0111ral Aincrica, and Canada. SUCCCSSIIII ullUfalion in Ihcsc cline,1lc-. I1lovidt's ICSliunuly to the 1.11IMS111CSS of IIIc dcsil-ns and ovcr,1ll rcliahilily I.1 Lui('nl TcilIII0IA ;icS' iahi11Ut S)'SlcUlti A Exhibit ISD" .7 Questions & Answers - PCS Safety • • 'AgRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Questions and Answers About PCS Antenna Safety • !rite: do °e. -sora: Cotrmur:c.:::or. St'S:frrS (.SCS) S::es emir? PCS s�-stcros reit -zdio w'zvcs in the "i .& GHz" frccucncy band which is a band of non- tonizi.^.g io "t2a: is;:on" si-p1� m:ans the P?ssageofcnc-g�' ,rough space. The .. frcq-.__.cs uscc i PCS tee :noloeics a -c called 'non-ionizin g'..radiz-on 1. 4 eoucncies b,—:ause iionS o.`timcs icsS :c an ;ic a-to.;r : - ::-cd to S- P.c!cctrons Tom aroms or moicc:::cs. Tc;c%-:s-= broaccaS's, zdio w'avcs. Tic-Qw'avcs; PCs, N;siblc Beit, infra -cc radia:io .. and otic: s.'7-, , r'orris of rac:z::on arc aao -_._--cd to as ::oa-ioniz ne cicc�o-ae-,ctic .mac:anon. T.ncse 2.7c all fo - of z�ian: cnc-gy that contain both clecnic and maencac Compos:n:s. encrey navels or "-adiatcs" away from its source in waves like the ripples Which form when a small pebble is th:ow'n into a still pond. Specifically, PCS radio waves arc produced in a frequency band between 1.85 - 1.98 GHz (gieahe. z or billion cvcics per second). Fr cauencx• -cfc-s to the nurnbc of waves passing a given point during a given time. ?:-'ONES S EN:ANCED S°=C:AL:?cJ MOBILE RADIO (ESMR) v33__ 1-R-koJ r IG — V(0LE, X-Z.%YS �Z� . S I i i I I I i i I I I 1 I I I I :0' 103 lOs i0 10' 1011 1013 lots 10" 10" :0-° I I E'RSONAL CO.vNfI1fCATION SERVICES (PCs) 1 I •� 1 R�[0 R=QUrC�' R-!,JiA.T1ON PCS facilities do not emit x-rays. X-rays and gam*na rays like those used in medical diagnosis and the-apy have billions (i.e., morc than 1:000 million or 1,000,000,000) of times more enc-zv than the MIC-Ow'?VCS utilized in PCS rc!c.-omm, unications. X-rays and gamcta rays arc called "ionizing radiation" because their hie::^. energies are sufficient to stip electrons from 0-c., "ion:zc') atoms or molecules. lonizatior gas been established as a cancer risk factor. The -to-: ior:zing radia:ior. one is cxaosed :o :he e-catc- their risl� of developing ria.:__-. T:uS ;ie o:en-ior:zi^e radiatio 2t lew'c- .`rcc cncics ane iqw:. _.. - and io-:z: ;z -ac:a:io- z:. e=_.:.cc;.cnc:cs and high:.- All igh:.All of the elecz-omag-:c:ic radia:ior. (EMR) below t :: 'a: u!--aviolet, including vis:bic light, PCs microw-ayes, and radio waves arc t<pcs of.ion-ionizing radiation. -As explained below-, PCS facilities are safe and me--: or exceed all professionally recognized U.S. safer' stanch -ds. • Are exposures highest immediateh• adjacent to the PCS sitz? No. Most PCS antennas arc located on monopoles or on the sides of buildings. The PCS si_Qrtal is desiened to be broadcast towards the horizon with a fairly well focused parem :hat has the result o.` producing a vee' w Cak S,27-31 di: cctl; be?ou tie PCS antenna cor..pa; cd to distances tithe. away. This dcs4r. is -,"?ical of PCS an:c.=2s which wan: the sig::al to :tach their Cusionic.-S a: Some dis:ZnCC 1:7077 :.`lc Source. • Yow does ;he irtZrsi l ofthe e- osure crcnge as you move at�•at from the ?CSsi;e? -- Like all .`o. --:s o: _._c::o-2�c.:c _-_-_ ' tie . Grain' if &.e Heid decreases %'C ' rz?idly' as �'OL TIO�'C 2w'2�' :7C71 L- P :::ai, t_ttc CCC: cas: in i^�"::Sees' :07o: O':a� EO ttic - 2:_ 0:: tc--":25: iS:2n=_. ! ..:5 ._ ::IL- Consequence 0: the .aC::res: t.ic s n =C_ 2::2 0: a Sph:- mc.c2sc= a: "^s. "a 0. _'c :2C..S. t n1:5 l: one :.O:;bicS Cis:2nC:O l t! e source, chc cX?os _ c:c.:2s:s �y (: ")- or i.=. If one :.o�"es ioI ti -..es as :2: Lo- the urce heir cXpas ::will c::. Case h%' (it=)- or 1/16. For cxa :.pi:, if :hc exposure from an so PCS source at -t00 feet was 10 micro-w-atu per square ccndmctc7 (micrOW. cm-) the exposure at 1,000 feet Would be (1:10)- or 1rI00 x 10 microW/cm- = 0.1 rmc.oW:'cra" (i.e., a decrease in intensity of 100 -i les for aninc::2sc in distance of 10 times). This relationship holds for perfectly uniform sources, and w-ide the PCS fields are mor: complex, this rc'.arionship will SE III ScrvC as a 2004 I1,st a.,�:OX:m2aOn. A eood =alog�" o::adiazion to dtmors=e this principal) :o ::is fou hand rapid c z.s�the !C":er'Vae you ret! as you move inverse closer to or fu: .- a,-%-a,,crorr &Ie flair: o:72 cardie. Tnc:: is a zone near tate f ame w'hc: c vOu C211 COmtO:.a :'� IC:1 the n:2C, how'c'.'C: II you i-novc Four nand away uOrn Che flame i. ^.0 tempo Grote drops apidIy unril you cz . no longe: perceive the heat from the candle. The maid change in tc:::penature %with dis:anc: is the effect of int,-wcd electromagneric enc.__" which is felt as hca: and bc:kaves the s2 :.c w•ay as all othe::o Trs of e?ectromag_ncnc enc, including PCS cans-issiorts. • How e posurzs rr :%.?CS;:ecil:::es c,m..7cre ivi:lz other Conntor.Sources ofs;m;lcrforns Of e.'ec:ronzao ze?:c ere. s.'? exposure inti, -c r,lic:otvavcs ovens, cot :.c:tia Common sources o: EMR exl �dio and television broadcasts, amatcur, poiic:: fl:: and CB radios. and others. Table I show's the exposure levels associated w'it_h some common forms of radio w•a%,c and mica ow av e technology. As can be seen, expose.::.,orn a PCS facilities zre vvpically or.l%a -action of -es f'o:n O: ;r. corny-lonly - -teed sources. Exposures'..0.'. `test corn. -non the exposures -..-��.. 2 C 2: �: c'='!V , :0Zn:z:� 2S c 2 _ as:)ubtlC c.\70S:.:_ :0 -`?CS s:•'S;_- _:- SICa...- less *.an ..._ oche::X705:cS tabic and 2:w.2..S -__. 2:.:X:=..'� S2:_- C2 :S ::2=Cn :'. t0 On .�c c .'2i 2:: aiso sa'e. Table 1: Exposure Levels from Comm n Forms of Radio Wave and Microwavc Technology Facility I Micro «:cm - `ear Sheriff's -Mobile Radio I _.750 Near Large FM Radio Tower i -100 Near CB Mobile Radio I -30 _ In Room with Microwave Oven I -20 Tv *cal Public Exposure Near pCS Si;c I <1 • Rno h=s e:-e!u:::ed rhe sale qf: uol:c e..cosure :o PCSjreatrenc:• elec:ro,.cczne:.'c enemy.? t ne 52:'x' o: e�?C;,.:.:o PCS 2,' i -:.!a: - - _ _ • • ... s pec_ ..:t• t.e:d.:.z. Cec:, cv2'_1:cC �t• z ..,:-•:br. Ot pro:_sslonai ._. 0:. .:0%*:— Cn--a! ?:q,nc:So_— around ttt'0 :nos: Sf2^d2'd5 for prOt,c:rOn 2Q?^s :: C$dhequcnct (Rr)omic:ot2vc itao^ C (\f�� field exposu_c are those published bt the .A.me ican National Standards Instivit: (.A.NSI) in their report entitled -Standard for Safer• Levels with Respect to'Hurnizn Exposure to Radio Frequency Fields; 3 kHz to. 300 GHz. R;port No. EEE'ANSI C9f.I-1992 and the National Council on Radiation Protection. and Measurement (NCRP) in their repo- authored by Scientific Cor,=,ittcc 53 entitled "Exposure Crit,-ia for RadioZ' ceuc::ct• Eiec�-or.:2gne:*c Fields. -'CRP Report No. S6. • lfire: s the —!; rel Cou^c.'1 or, Padic!' ?: Pro!ec:: r. ard.-VeySar n ee (- CRP)? .^! The NCR° is private. Coneressionally charted ins-,irunon with dhe charge to protide expert analysis of a varier`• of issues (especial!v health and safe.v recommendations) on radiations of all forms. The scienrific analyses of the NCRP are held in high esteem in the scientific and rc_ularory comma* ict both nationally and internationally. In fact, the vast majority of the radiological health regulations curendy in existenct- can trace their origin in some way to the recon-unendations ofthe NCRP. A total o:'16 p":vsical. biolo,ica!, and Medical sciLn;ists pa., c:pa:ed is the delibe.atiors of Scientific Com.-ainee 5_ (SC -53) ir.:he prc:)272:'On Oft::- c -;tri2 doc; -tent f0: limiting exposure to RF radiations. Three tve:c ph}•sic2! scientists, nine wc:, biolo-eical scientists, three were _'v1Ds. and one was a veterinary Dhvsicran (D.V.-M.). All 16 scientists were employed in acad--Mc or by federal agencies eno22ed in research or in regulation of RFrL1« radiation. A!thou2h the NCRP selects ;he MCM..be:ship of its scientific-C-or,.mi^.ccs on the bases of czpc-ise as scicntis:s. divc:siry of speciaiization and discipline. and balance of viewpoints, it ,ccuires them -,o reach 2 urari no conscnse s or, expos`c cnrena and limits beforr a eoc - e 's re!ez5cs for publ:catio,:. cons; - :R Se!... o :r.e:r r_- :G�rdlr.iCrO�'v:elr?o:r2r.C. (�^:�(3j�7ub!fc e:posi�re sc �e.-t;:crdcrd? r1,`ter sere al years o: et•sluarine the na::cn2! and :r.tc:az::oral scic^ ific acd bion' cdical lite avlres (including those of the Sovie: Union and Otho: esteem bloc counties), the members of t::^.c NCRP scientific con ni^cc sc!Cc:cd 931 pcblicatiors ir, the scic^rtic lite�vy, or. tt ^ich :o b2sc :.`;err rcco,:.-cnda;non;. T1. he �ditio aE NCRP phiIoso;)hV of providtng 3 Ig C: st?nd2rd Of protC-::C: for nX::rbe:s of :::e ecnc:3i popui.vion than for occ::pzt oral!} cxpc5c; irdW'd.'als pro- -d z _.coed tie: in tee p - it cx os:.. s;anda...a by i. which levels of allowable exposure were substantially reduced for "uncontrolled and continuous exposures." This measure was mkcn to account for the fact that vork-ers in an industrial c.ivirorment arc rnpically exposed no more than eight hours a day %,.•hile members of the general population in proximity to a sour:" of RF.Nl«' ene- c-ry nav be exposed continuously. T-n:s additiona! protcc:ion factor also pro%'dcs a greater mar¢ir. ofsafcy for children. the in;►rm. aced, or othe.-s who ;night be more sensitive :o RF. -N -M cxposu-e. • ii'nat is the currer.: continuous whole bode- public exposure scie. s:--itderd set by the A'CRP? T -he Cur-cni ICRP ".:JR.: enC2t:0^ fo,- public cx?OSu:c at :^e mos:."SJ•ictive PCS ><ca cnC� (c.Q.. 1.8: GHz) I*r-its cxzosi rc to nic-o « c n" :or continuous exposure. High". cxpcs _ 27_ 2:!0'-VCC :ors 0- -rc: 005 of tic:" pro<<dc.. ,n2: no 30 .:.in ,. cmc- w•c;c}-JCC 2%-Z-2 2C cx:__-s !.2:J :-o «' c-:-. P b:'ic cxpcs_._ =0-: PCS f3c•...ics are Rpic2Ik- less ;.:2t i : iC-O «: c n" 2-.c :pus ze :37 below' t,.c c0-,:inuous hoie body public exposu:c ii : sc. \CRP. • Does the FCC require the te!ecommuricatiors industn• to limit exposure to the public to a certain levei.' /fso..tit•h2f is :he mar:mum perm.'ssible continuous :thole bode -public exposure standard for erpos:tres; rotr. ?CS telecommuric.ztions? Yes. The ',9922 ..NSI s:2nd2rd \vas adopted by ::.c Fede -al Communications Commission (FCC) I.-. 0: e- to a c c r e55 i:5 re57onsi0llit! cs [ince- dic National Enviro=enta! Policv Act (NEPA) to CJnSidc- its actions will "s:giiticantly affect the quality of the human ens irorli<<cnt.- In so fa as the -e was no ofnciai s:zndard issued by a federal agency such as the Er%iro,=entzi Pro:ec:ion Agency (EPA) the FCC used v, -h2' it considered to be the best av2ilable s:artda:d ar tine t :, e. T'ne 1992 :-',-\SI standard w•as chosen because it was widely accepted and technically supportable. This stzndard is identical to the NCRP standard for the PCS telecor-m unication facilities and thus w•ouid allow continuous public exposure at their must .csaicdye freeucncy (i.e., 1.85 GHz) below an intensity of 1.3=3 micro W/cm'. Higher exposures a:;! 2!lov:'ed -or brief periods provide? _gat no _0 minute :ime veigared average exposure exceeds ! _':_ r-iC-o «:'c r'. Public exposures 'o- PCS sv5:em are typically less than 1 miC-o %V.;cm a^.d :-tis far below :he allowed exposer c standa-ds utiliz"c by the FCC. Does the ne:t.4 V Si standcrd consider non -thermal (athermal) and cumulative ejects ofnon- ioni_ing radiation e;oosure? Yes, the =ent .A.\SI sandard "onside. -"d both ;he potcnt:al i. IP2c: c;ra[he„na! and eumu!acive e�fccts. To Juote f om the ! 992 ANSI srandard -"'.',able scieri:ific data exist InCi:2:.-S .: 2:...C2. .70:-: "x705[:,-.. to _.__ -0rn24- ".:c ilc:Cs iS Cumula:i�'e, or Non- thc.7mai (di nt.-'?'1 lot^_. Zn snoce:) a.- od i'_::or 57cCi'.'c 5"��c:3e o ex70sur'_ -;211 De M.C2n171,o U'" -_i2._.. :0 .. - 2 .."31: I ioa?e ?_.:99_' ANS 'I T: -,c su7posit:or.:`s[ tCe-e w't1I 2C _"5" biCiOe :2t _.:e�:5 'O^ 0'•�' ."�'": �` CXDOS�:._ 25 ..._ -e5 .. 0: cu'rP.ul2rit'e a:._::3 is no: 5:-:70^cC bV .'e 5:ien.iiiC tl:_-3-_,-_ O,- 16'25: -•2;0- Of SCIe 1CtlC 071 10r 3.^.d rl L'S 35 SL'C l IS COnS:CC-CC �' tie scic: ,:::c co=U ::r%' 2S c specul3livc. .' 1 a Person 's exposure Aded the NCRP or A.-N.SI standard. what eV tit•ould that have on : I_ :4 their bode' or their health? r It is imporant to realize that the current ANSI and `CRP rra_Ximum alloxable exposures are not set at a threshold between safer\ and known hazard but rather at 60 times below' a level that the ma,ority of the scientific community believes -nay pose a health risk to human populaaor:s. Thus continuous public exposures as much as 61.6:0 nitro «"crn: (i.e. SO x !?33 micro W. cm') art bclo-,%• the mir,imum lavet-a: -:a-,' pose a health ;:sk. The starda:ds also allow for expos=es to higher levels for brief pe -;ods of :imc Provided a: no 30 minute time Wclehtcd ave -age exceeds 1.233 micro :c n'. Thus it would be saic fora nc tbe: of the public to be exposed to 2:000 micro W" -n- for 10 -n1_'ru:.cs as lore as tic exposure dt:ring t:7c otic. _'0 -inu'cs v.- lass :i an S=0 -tic -o «'.c n'. Co^side fine :'-c nos: pubic cxposu-cs from PCS f2c:!i..cs z-_ :ass t`.zn 1 r-:iC70 W. Cin'. o-_ C2- 2p?- =:- :hat b- _. cxpcsu:cs to -1l:Cn e!S %k' : no: ?c=c 2 ..e2':i�' hazz.`. :S:i:2;z•'?/:�27_.'.,e?�?CSr.C'.' :7GS:c•?c_.. :reCGr.:rO:zrS:'.: treque:G:2::S:S about ZT7GS1rzS to o:.:0re:;C 2!GS 1rGn: t70%�'er ;r7r5.7:SS.`Gr. _r.0 d.Sir:7tt::or ::r.?s. Re:en:'.v the-c't�as bccn a lot of media attention on t-ic possible biological effcc:s o: vamous types of nor. -ionizing radiation. It is important to ,:Coen izc that the ph�'sical propc tics of and biological responses to exuemely low E•equcncy (ELF) fields that come from powr. transmission and disa:bution lines (also referred to as 60 -Hz :fields) dicier ma:kcdly from those ofthe higher PCS f'eauency fields. as die freouency of an elec.:orr agneac w'ag'e incre25es. is V,•211•cieng &::cases. At I.S- CHz. for exa- pie, t,e �ta�eicnQth ofth s PCS cecucnc� i6 centi-neje-s (app-oxi*-ate:� 6 int :es). A 60 -Hz :acid, i^. _oo f ,000;_.conast, hes a w ave:en_z^i- ex:ess tae frequenc_. (VhF) band (30-300 �'7) a:--m-xi'ali� absorbed be_ause the wa�eie^v:rs are closest to the pi: sica! !eng.hs of -human beings. i ne absorptton o: ene: c.• ov people at'PCS frequencies is substant-i'ally less t:.an in the \,79 band twat Co �-no;,l� utilized for teie�ision broadc2s:s. The bioio�icz! ef.eC:_ data base de��ei0ped to a -s« e. c e5tion_ 2ba t tie. e:i: a o: poV e: line frcoucnCv e!eC.—;c a. -,d nate:tic Ields Cannot be :s:.:o redia, t: e bioiogica Cis of PCS frequ cies. To do so .-o:1il be to comoa-c "ap;, es to ora _ges For exac plc. it wog:d be no mo -c 2:)Wopr:ate to co,::pa-e the 0iologtc2l ef.,C:5 0: po�;'er tie0'ue 1Cv eleC:-C az,a maple^c fields to PCS frequcaCv exposure that it would be to cornparc the biolog!cal effects litc:anc or. radiofrc0ucncy exposure to that �isiblc light. «;rile they are all formsof non- :.. -ionizing c!eC -omagr,etic energy, their properiics and po=,nal biological of eC:s a c quite diffc.ent. Comparisons be:w•cca PCS, radio, MIC-7Ow•2VC, Tc cvision and sir:,ilar broadcast bands is-easonabie bc:at:se :hev occupy' the same se7lc-a, rLgion of the e!cc: o,::a2.nc:ic 50e:, .. . _.2nd',��'e 5i ' itar e.^.e-� ir'c0e0c� and assoc:a:t'` :oio�:cal effz::s. • Cc.-, ...-Cu _.rnar r:_? .°:? SC'2:'.'CGr.5:=7SCS:2;?CGnar.ar.:C ::GrS' PCS :aC::o-2nS-.-_._. esi 2-c 0: .=.iCn. _-_ :c'..-=c%•e-,:_ _ __ _..c.. max:^ a: ex0os... _ .o ....o .n w n,..h ail o_e-a..- g 2..u!' ✓e�� c- , a c circu,;.s:ancc du- ;� -ou:ins ooe-z:ionj. publ:. cx=cs_ cs :70.. _ PCS fat:l r• less thzn -1 rnic:o W.crn.. This exposur. is :no -c: --n ..='OG ::7nt's .0%, cr :11 t::c ANSI or \CRP public-xpcsur: S=ndards. _­ . • Exhibit "E" Photosims 0 lk. Al, 1 T4 - JV 0 Exhibit 'IF" Propagation Maps Ah s Exhibit IIG" Service Area Map I n 0 Exhibit IIH" Search Rings 0 rvLcc: Priority:P1 Meed Creek SF03UB322 p. RIO BRAVO OD .. W st..3h .. • • .. _ . m TULNANI _ HLLOus.l: DUSTYLN RANCHO RD F INCH O o1&.d NO RD ¢ WILSON LANDING RD eB KATHY g z H RObI WAY MICHELLE (L4 3 NIOHTHAWK w KEITH LN STONE VA Town: CLav t ' N39' 47.4%' Ragos Butte County •� Stat.: CA 2ti W121*53.687 ( Z1PW mama: xw . �gPtL 95973 Z Cr 00 w SYCAMORE BRETT C J BESSER F BB Y y TODD a �a�^ u •31uar.m Oa. HOROi NORD� 2 TOKAY RANCH RD ®1999 D�I.ame. SRM AILS USA '• ' Site Name: Mud Creek Site ID I Latitude Longitude I GE(m) Rad Center m Min GE m Max RC (m1rMin RC m SF03UB322 1 39-47-27 N 121-53-41 W I 50 1 40 50 70 35 Site Objectives: To provide coverage to SR -99, SR -32, and NW part of Chico. The site is designed to hand-off to SF03UB351 (Gold Creek) going North on SR -99, to SF03UB326 (Downtown Chico) going South on SR -99, and to SF03UB349 (Hamilton City) going West on SR -32. Additional Comments: The SAR is centered on an exisiting tower at 39-47-27N & 121-53-41 inside a storage facility called "Port -a -Storage". Tower owner information is not available. Please try to investigate height extension since present height may be insufficient. Also, look for taller candidates. Engineer: JHasan Mahmood Release #: 1.0 lRelease Date: 3/30/00 Ubiquitel Release Date: i Approval: __ Q'A'%O • Exhibit "I" Structural Report I 1 I I I 0 NOTES: 1. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A-615 (GRADE 60) EXCEPT THAT CAISSON TIES MAY BE ASTM A-615 (GRADE 40). 3. SEE PREVIOUS PAGE FOR ANCHOR BOLTS SIZE AND LENGTH. 4. TOTAL VOLUME OF CONCRETE = 22 CUBIC YARDS (FOR 3 CAISSONS). 0 Pl'fi,f 'f, ///. ( _ P.O. BOX 8597 FORT WORTH, TX 76124-0597 (817) 457-3060 FAX (817) 429--6010 Page: 2 16X /0 /& f97 2 Design: REK Dwg: UMA Date: 10-16-97 Job No.: 15247 Design No.: 97-4022—A Reference No.: Tower: 86 FT SELF—SUPPORT TOWER Location: CA -0713B, CHICO, CA Owner: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Design: 75 MPH, NO ICE Revision: Date: ACCORDING TO ANSI/EIA-222—F 196 5. FOUNDATION DESIGN IS BASED UPON THE SOIL REPORT PROVIDED BY ROBERT YOUNG & ASSOCIATES, INC., DATED: OCT'97, P# CA -0713B CAISSON FO UNDA TION NOT TO SCALE ANCHOR BOLTS FINISHED GRADE 1. 3'-6" SEC. ELEVATION PLAN #5 TIES TIES ® 6" C.C. FOR TOP 7' y� Q roc yow oc \may �G ok REM. LENGTH e" pa 0, `cAAa #5 TIES ® 12" C.C. 5Q 1'-0" MIN. OVERLAP 10 �c ococo `oC� ♦o`cyQ\�y ,00 (12) #8 VER. RE -BARS ® EQ. SPACING BASE REACTIONS: (SERVICE LOADS) UPLIFT = 96 KIPS COMPRESSION = 110 KIPS SHEAR = 12 KIPS i • JOB# 15393 DESIGN #97-4022-A CA -0713B CHICO, CA. NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 8G' SELF SUPPORT TOWER Leading The Way Section:. JOB# 15393 DESIGN #97-4022-A CA-0713B CHICO, CA. NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 86' SELF SUPPORT TOWER Customer: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Site: CA -07138, CHICO, CA F I I n C Job # 15393 AV P.O. BOX 8597 FORT WORTH, TX 76124-0597 (817) 457-3060 FAX (817) 429-6010 %� Tower Height 8686 FT. al - Design No. 97-4022A Date 10/16/9 Revision No. _ 0 Date 10/16/97 I Q�QFESS/pN �rj Page I of 2 By: PSLIdSdA DESIGN SPECS."DAjWRS222-F ! // ��Q� p LLFN✓ Fye /. Q^ PORTANCE FACTOR - 1.0 IUINCREASE IN ALLOWABLE STRESSES - 1.33 .0 y l pA.� USES. LU N0. 1823 CASE 1 -BASIC WIND- 75.0 MPH, NO ICE LU Exp. 9-30-01 CASE 2 -OPERATIONAL WIND- 50.0 MPH, NO ICE tTaLcnrrull l ANTENNA LIST . AP .P OF ASTM EL shwas eZ 1-12 TOP R A36 A325 a TOP 1-14' ADJ. PLATFORM - - N m m W o s z 11 Of z 0 1 -LDF7 17 76' 6'0 STD -NO RADOME z Z 18-29 I1 12-DB874H - 12 -LDF7 - 56' 1-14' SECTOR MOUNT - 30 46' 6'0 STD -NO RADOME 0' co 31 N O] cc o o: x c \ Ir ~ z z z I1 z a) h I v \ m z z z z z I N a, K O Go U � 1 to � O n coa i co z z z z I z N O F- Y n � 1 in n v x z z z z z z z I\ z I �o Z to N H U S L JO m •^ �0NMIn0MM OJ (a w o C7 0 K M M d' UZ J O Ln Vl 0 0 N 1 (FUT. (FUT. (FUT. (FLIT. (FUT. (FUT. la EL shwas eZ 1-12 TOP 12-DB874H - 12 -LDF7 - TOP 1-14' ADJ. PLATFORM - - 13-15 TOP 3-DB810K - 3 -LDF7 16 76' 6'f STD -NO RADOME 0 1 -LDF7 17 76' 6'0 STD -NO RADOME 0 1 -LDF7 18-29 56' 12-DB874H - 12 -LDF7 - 56' 1-14' SECTOR MOUNT - 30 46' 6'0 STD -NO RADOME 0' 1 -LDF7 31 46' 6'0 STD -NO RADOME 0' 1 -LDF7 LINEAR APPURTENANCES �1 CLIMBING LADDER(S) 2; WAVECUIDE LADDERS: (10-. 86', 10- 76') COAX EQUALLY DISTRIBUTED ON TWO FACES FULLY EXPOSED TO THE WIND xq _5_Q: A NOTE: TOWER MEETS MQQMUM TWIST AND SWAY REOUIREl1EHIS OF 0.46 DECREES FOR A 6' DISH (16 CH: OR LESS) AT 76' ELEVATION, AT AN OPERATIONAL WIND SPEED OF 50 MPH M G+L MEMBER TABLE y B L2X2 X316 > C L21 2x21 2X3 160' 3 MAX, BASE REACTIONS/LE (OLF NOT INCL.) qqq� UPLIFT: 95.8 KIPS MAX ONE LEC COMP: 109.2 KIPS MAX ONE LEC HORIZ: 11.5 KIPS MAX ONE LEC EST. WT STL• 8.0 KIPS The method of analysis used is based on the equilibrium of joints. The basic structure is statically determinate and the forces in members meeting at a joint can be determined independent of the forces in members at other joints. COORDINATE SYSTEM X I I I I I I i Y <-------------Z (UP) The Analysis Reported in this Document must be Reviewed by an experienced engineer. DATE: 10-27-1997 TIME: 8:51:52 PAGE 1 FWT INC. .P. O. BOX 8597. FORT WORTH, TX 76124-0597 Analysis 6 Design of 86. -FT Tower per EIA/TIA/RS222-E Design for 75. MPH Wind; .00 Inch Ice. Operate 'at 50. mph wind; .00 Inch Ice. Location: CA -07138, CHICO, CA JOB NO.: 15393 Customer: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Engineer: PS/UMA DESIGN NO.: 97-4022A Design 'Date: 10/16/97 Revision No.: 0 The method of analysis used is based on the equilibrium of joints. The basic structure is statically determinate and the forces in members meeting at a joint can be determined independent of the forces in members at other joints. COORDINATE SYSTEM X I I I I I I i Y <-------------Z (UP) The Analysis Reported in this Document must be Reviewed by an experienced engineer. * -- Elevations are measured from Tower Base. Tower Base Elevation = .0 • • DATE: 10-27-1997 TIME: 8:51:52 PAGE 2 FWT INC. P. O. BOX 8597. FORT WORTH, TX 76124-0597 Analysis 6 Design of 86.-FT Tower per EIA/TIA/RS222-E Design for 75. MPH Wind; .00 Inch Ice. Operate at 50. mph wind; .00 Inch Ice. Location: CA-07138, CHICO, CA JOB NO.: 15393 Customer: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Engineer: PS/UMA DESIGN NO.: 97-4022A Design Date: 10/16/97 Revision No.: 0 L I N E A R A P P U R T E N A N C E S From* To' ---- wind Areas (ft•ft/ft) ---- Weights--(lb/ft) Number (ft) (ft) Af0 Afi Aro Ari WO Wi Description 1 .0 86.0 .000 .000 .560 .860 4.644 8.616 1 Climbing Ladders 2 10.0 86.0 .000 .000 .008 .010 3.396 9.804 Waveguide Support 3 10.0 76.0 .000 .000 .000 .000 3.396 9.804 Waveguide Support 4 10.0 86.0 .000 .000 2.376 3.576 11.040 29.544 (12)-LDF7--1 5/8 5 10.0 86.0 .000 .000 .594 .894 2.760 7.392 (3)-LDF7--1 5/8 6 10.0 76.0 .000 .000 .198 .298 .924 2.460 (1)-LDF7--1 5/8 7 10.0 76.0 .000 .000 .198 .298 .924 2.460 -(1)-LDF7--1 5/8 8 10.0 56.0 .000 .000 2.376 3.576 11.040 29.544 (12)-LDF7--1 5/8 9 10.0 46.0 .000 .000 .198 .298 .924 2.460 (1)-LDF7--1 5/8 10 10.0 46.0 .000 .000 .198 .298 .924 2.460 (1)-LDF7--1 5/8 * -- Elevations are measured from Tower Base. Tower Base Elevation = .0 • DATE: 10-27-1997 TIME: 8:51:52 PAGE 3 FWT INC. P. O. BOX 8597. FORT WORTH, TX 76124-0597 Analysis 6 Design of 86.-FT Tower per EIA/TIA/RS222-E Design for 75. MPH Wind; .00 Inch Ice. Operate at 50. mph wind; .00 Inch Ice. Location: CA-0713B, CHICO, CA JOB NO.: 15393 Customer: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Engineer: PS/UMA DESIGN NO.: 97-4022A Design Date: 10/16/97 Revision No.: 0 Design Wind Velocity (V) = 75.00 mph. Importance Factor = 1.00 Gust Response Factor (Gh)= 1.17 Qz - .00256•Kz•( 5625.0) VELOCITY PRESSURES AT SECTION MID-HEIGHTS. From' To' Gh•Qz (ft) (ft) Kz (psf) 80.00 86.00 1.302 21.989 60.00 80.00 1.240 20.945 40.00 60.00 1.126 19.025 20.00 .40.00 1.000 16.895 .00 20.00 1.000 16.895 G --> (2'Ag*Gh•Qz) Controls • -- Elevations are measured from Tower Base. Tower Base Elevation = 0. DATE: 10-27-1997 TIME: 8:51:52 PAGE 4 FWT INC. P. O. BOX 8597. FORT WORTH, TX 76124-0597 Analysis b Design of 86. -FT Tower per EIA/TIA/RS222-E Design for 75. MPH Wind; .00 Inch Ice. Operate at 50. mph wind; .00 Inch Ice. Location: CA -0713B, CHICO, CA JOB NO.: 15393 Customer: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Engineer: PS/UMA DESIGN NO.: 97-4022A Design Date: 10/16/97 Revision No.: 0 ' "'.WIND LOAD DUE TO STRUCTURE 6 LINEAR APPURTENANCES PER TOWER PANEL Elevations Ave. Effective Structural Total Panel Wind Force Panel From• To•' Width Gh•Qz Wind Areas, ft••2 (kips) (ft) (ft) . (ft) (psf) a Cf Rr Normal Apex Parallel Aa Normal Apex ,Parallel 1 80.0 86.0 4.0 22.0 .95 2.001.00 22.76 22.14 22.30 .00 1.001 .974 .981 SECTION 1 NO ICE TOTALS: 22.76 22.14 22.30 .00 1.001 .974 .981 2 75.0 80.0 4.3 20.9 .88 1.89 .96 17.95 17.51 17.62 .00 .711 .693 .698 3 70.0 75.0 4.8 20.9 .79 1.81 .89 16.84 16.38 16.50 .00 .638 .620 .625 4 65.0 70.0 5.3 20.9 .72 1.78 .83 16.07 15.59 15.71 .00 ..599 .581 .585 5 60.0 65.0 5.8 20.9 .66 1.78 .79 15.53 15.02 15.15 .00 .579 .560 .564 SECTION 2 NO ICE TOTALS: 66.39 64.50 64.97 .00 .2.525 2.454 2.472 6 53.3 60.0 6.3 19.0 .60 1.80 .76 20.02 19.41 19.57 .00 .686 .665 .671 7 46.7 53.3 7.0 19.0 .55 1.84 .72 19.47 18.82 18.98 .00 .683 .660 .666 8 40.0 46.7 7.7 19.0 .51 1.89 .70 19.09 18.42 18.59 .00 .688 .663 .669 SECTION 3 NO ICE TOTALS: 58.58 56.65 57.13 .00 2.057 1.989 2.006 9 33.3 40.0 8.3 16.9 .47 1.94 .68 19.09 18.38 18.56 .00 .625 .602 .,608 10 26.7 33.3 9.0 16.9 .44 1.99 .67 18.93 18.18 18.37 .00 .636 .611 .617 11 20.0 26.7 9.7 16.9 .41 2.04 .66 18.84 18.05 18.25 .00 .649 .622 .629 SECTION 4 NO ICE TOTALS: 56.86 54.62 55.18 .00 1.910 1.835 1.853 12 13.3 20.0 10.3 16.9 .41 2.05 .65 20.18 19.15 19.41 .00 .698 .663 .672 13 6.7 13.3 11.0 16.9 .27 2.37 .61 14.31 13.24 13.51 .00 .573 .530 .540 14 .0 6.7 11.7 16.9 .15 2.75 .58 9.35 8.23 8.51 .00 .435 .383 .396 SECTION 5 NO ICE TOTALS: 43.84 40.63 41.43 .00 1.706 1.576 1.608 G --> (2•Ag•Gh*Qz) Controls • -- Elevations are measured from Tower Base. Tower Base Elevation v 0. DATE: 10-27-1997 TIME: 8:51:52 PAGE 5 FWT INC. P. O. BOX 8597. FORT WORTH, TX 76124-0597 Analysis 6 Design of 86. -FT Tower per EIA/TIA/RS222-E Design for 75. MPH Wind; .00 Inch Ice. Operate at 50. mph wind; .00 Inch Ice. Location: CA -0713B, CHICO, CA JOB NO.: 15393 Customer: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Engineer: PS/UMA DESIGN NO.: 97-4022A Design Date: 10/16/97 Revision No.: 0 P O I N T L O A D S A T E L E V A T I O N 86.0 ft F R O M T 0 W E R B A S E. Load # 1: 12-DB874H. Mounted at Tower C.G. Case Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz 1 -1.00 .00 -.17 .00 .00 .00 2 -.50 .87 -.17 .00 .00 .00 3 .50 .87 -.17 .00 .00 .00 4 1.00 .00 -.17 .00 .00 .00 5 .50 -.87 -.17 .00 .00 .00 6 -.50 -.87 -.17 .00 .00 .00 7 -.87 -.50 -.17 .00 .00 .00 8 .00 1.00 -.17 .00 .00 .00 9 .87 -.50 -.17 .00 .00 .00 ,0 .87 .50 -.17 .00 .00 .00 Ll .00 -1.00 -.17 .00 .00 .00 i2 -.87 .50 -.17 .00 .00 .00 Load # 2: 1-14' ADJ. PLATFORM. Mounted at Tower C.G. Case Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz 1 -1.11 .00 -3.50 .00 .00 .00 2 -.56 .96 -3.50 .00 .00 .00 3 .56 .96 -3.50 .00 .00 .00 4 1.11 .00 -3.50 .00 .00 .00 5 .56 -.96 -3.50 .00 .00 .00 6 -.56 -.96 -3.50 .00 .00 .00 7 ...96 -.56 -3.50 .00 .00 .00 8 .00 1.11 -3.50 .00 .00 .00 9 .96 -.56 -3.50 .00 .00 .00 10 .96 .56 -3.50 .00 .00 .00 11 .00 -1.11 -3.50 .00 .00 .00 12 -.96 .56 -3.50 .00 .00 .00 I,nad # 3: 3-DB810K. Mounted at Tower C.G. Case Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz 1 -.28 .00 -.10 .00 .00 .00 2 -.14 .24 -.10 .00 .00 .00 3 .14 .24 -.10 .00 .00 .00 4 .28 .00 -.10 .00 .00 .00 5 .14 -.24 -.10 .00 .00 .00 6 -.14 -.24 -.10 .00 .00 .00 7 -.24 -.14 -.10 .00 .00 .00 8 .00 .28 -.10 .00 .00 .00 9 .24 -.14 -.10 .00 .00 .00 10 .24 .14 -.10 .00 .00 .00 I1 .00 -.28 -.10 .00 .00 .00 12 -.24 .14 -.10 .00 .00 .00 DATE: 10-27-1997 TIME: 8:51:52 PAGE 6 FWT INC. P. O. BOX 8597. FORT WORTH, TX 76124-0597 Analysis 6 Design of 86. -FT Tower per EIA/TIA/RS222-E Design for 75. MPH Wind'; .00 Inch Ice. Operate at 50. mph wind; .00 Inch Ice. Location: CA -0713B, CHICO, CA JOB NO.: 15393 Customer: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Engineer: PS/UMA DESIGN NO.: 97-4022A Design Date: 10/16/97 Revision No.: 0 P O I N T L O A D S A T E L E V A T I O N 76.0 ft F R 0 M T O W E R B A S E. Load 8 4: 1 -6 -ft STD PARABOLIC -No Rad. Mounted at Corner 1 Case Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz 1 -1.24 .00 -.14 .00 .00 .00 2 -.62 1.07 -.14 .00 .00 .00 3 .62 1.07 -.14 .00 .00 .00 4 1.24 .00 -.14 .00 .00 .00 5 .62 -1..07 -.14 .00 .00 .00 6 -.62 -1.07 -.14 .00 .00 .00 7 -.82 -.47 -.14 .00 .00 -.53 8 .00 .95 -.14 .00 .00 -.53 9 .82 -.47 -.14 .00 .00 -.53 10 .82 .47 -.14 .00 .00 .53 11 .00 -.95 -.14 .00 .00 .53 12 -.82 .47 -.14 .00 .00 .53 Load $ 5: 1 -6 -ft STD PARABOLIC -No Rad. Mounted at Corner 1 Case Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz 1 -1.24 .00 -.14 .00 .00 .00 2 -.62 1.07 -.14 .00 .00 .00 3 .62 1.07 -.14 .00 .00 .00 4 1.24 .00 -.14 .00 .00 .00 5 .62 -1.07 -.14 .00 .00 .00 6 -.62 -1.07 -.14 .00 .00 .00 7 -.82 -.47 -.14 .00 .00 -.53 8 .00 .95 -.14 .00 .00 -.53 9 .82 -.47 -.14 .00 .00 -.53 10 .82 .47 -.14 .00 .00 .53 11 .00 -.95 -.14 .00 .00 .53 12 -.82 .47 -.14 .00 .00 .53 P O I N T L O A D S A T E L E V A T I O N 56.0 ft F R 0 M T 0 W E R B A S E. 'Load 9 6: 12-DB874H. Mounted at Tower C.G. Cabe Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz 1 -.B8 .00 -.17 .00 .00 .00 2 -.44 .77 -.17 .00 .00 .00 3 .44 .77 -.17 .00 .00 .00 4 .88 .00 -.17 .00 .00 .00 5 .44 -.77 -.17 .00 .00 .00 6 -.44 -.77 -.17 .00 .00 .00 7 -.77 -.44 -.17 .00 .00 .00 8 .00 .88 -.17 .00 .00 .00 9 .77 -.44 -.17 .00 .00 .00 10 .77 .44 -.17 .00 .00 .00 11 .00 -.88 -.17 .00 .00 .00 12 -.77 .44 -.17 .00 .00 .00 DATE: 10-27-1997 TIME: 8:51:52 PAGE 7 FWT INC. P. O. BOX 8597. FORT WORTH, TX 76124-0597 Analysis 6 Design of 86. -FT Tower per EIA/TIA/RS222-E Design for 75. MPH Wind; .00 Inch Ice. Operate at 50. mph wind; .00 Inch Ice. Location: CA -0713B, CHICO, CA JOB NO.: 15393 Customer: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Engineer: PS/UMA DESIGN NO.: 97-4022A Design Date: 10/16/97 Revision No.: 0 P O I N T L O A D S A T E L E V A T I O N 56.0 ft F R O M T O W E R B A S E. Load 9 7: 1-14' SECTOR MOUNT. Mounted at Tower C.G. Case Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz 1 -1.22 .00 -2.80. .00 .00 .00 2 -.61 1.06 -2.80 .00 .00 .00 3 .61 1.06 -2.80 .00 .00 .00 4 1.22 .00 -2.80 .00 .00 .00' 5 .61 -1.06 -2.80 .00 .00 .00 6 -.61 -1.06 -2.80 .00 .00 .00 7 -1.06 -.61 -2.80 .00 .00 .00 8 .00 1.22 -2.80 .00 .00 .00 9 1.06 -.61 -2.80 .00 .00 .00 10 1.06 .61 -2.80 .00 .00 .00 11 .00 -1.22 -2.80 .00 .00 .00 12 -1.06 .61 -2.80 .00 .00 .00 P 0 1 N T L O A D S A T E L E V A T I O N 46.0 ft F R 0 M T 0 W E R B A S E. Load 9 8: 1 -6 -ft STD PARABOLIC -No Rad. Mounted at Corner 1 Case Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz 1 -1.07 .00 -.14 .00 .00 .00 2 -.54 .93 -.14 .00 .00 .00 3 .54 .93 -.14 .00 .00 .00 4 1.07 .00 -.14 .00 .00 .00 5 .54 -.93 -.14 .00 .00 .00 6 -.54 -.93 -.14 .00 .00 .00 7 -.71 -.41 -.14 .00 .00 -.46 8 .00 .82 -.14 .00 .00 -.46 9 .71 7:41 -.14 .00 .00 -.46 10 .71 .41 -.14 .00 .00 .46 11 .00 -.82 -.14 .00 .00 .46 12 -.71 .41 -.14 .00 .00 .46 Load 1 9: 1 -6 -ft STD PARABOLIC -No Rad. Mounted at Corner 1 Case Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz 1 -1.07 ,00 -.14 .00 .00 .00 2 -.54 .93 -.14 .00 .00 .00 3 .54 .93 -.14 .00 .00 .00 4 1.07 .00 -.14 .00 .00 .00 5 .54 -.93 -.14 .00 .00 .00 6 -.54 -.93 -.14 .00 .00 .00 7 -.71 -.41 -.14 .00 .00 -.46 8 .00 .82 -.14 .00 .00 -.46 9 .71 -.41 -.14 .00 .00 -.46 10 .71 .41 -.14 .00 .00 .46 11 .00 -.82 -.14 .00 .00 .46 12 . -.71 .41 -.14 .00 .00 .46 DATE: 10-27-1997 TIME: 8:51:52 PAGE. 8 FWT INC. P. O. BOX 8597. FORT WORTH, TX 76124-0597 Analysis & Design of 86. -FT Tower per .EIA/TIA/RS222-E Design for 75. MPH Wind; .00 Inch Ice. Operate at 50. mph wind; .00 Inch Ice. Location: CA -0713B, CHICO, CA JOB NO.: 15393 Customer: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Engineer: PS/UMA DESIGN NO.: 97-4022A Design Date: 10/16/97 Revision No.: 0 R E A C T I O N S A T G R O U N D L E V E L Jnt_1 Jnt_2 Jnt_3 SUMMATION OF REACTIONS Case Rx Ry Rz Rx Ry Rz Rx Ry Rz Rx Ry Rz 1 -10.44 .00 95.52 -3.75 -4.58 -56.73 -3.75 4.58 -56.73 -17.95 .00 -17.95 2 -5.11 1.20 45.35 1.87 4.83 45.62 -5.92 9.84 -108.93 -9.16 15.87 -17.95 3 5.85 1.16 -57.00 5.40 8.95 95.79 -2.28 5.44 -56.73 8.97 15.54 -17.95 4 11.49 .00 -109.20 3.41 3.94 45.62 3.41 -3.94 45.62 18.32 .00 -17.95 5 5.85 -1.16 -57.00 -2.28 -5.44 -56.73 5.40 -8.95 95.79 8.97 -15.54 -17.95 6 -5.11 -1.20 45.35 -5.92 -9.84 -108.93 1.87 -4.83 45.62 -9.16 -15.87 -17.95 7 -8.40 -.68 76.32 -5.21 -7.66 -88.38 -1.07 -.14 -5.89 -14.68 -8.48 -17.95 8 .42 1.27 -6.16 3.85 7.48 76.59 -4.27 8.20 -88.38 .00 16.95 -17.95 9 9.25 -.68 -88.65 .65 -.85 -5.89 4.79 -6.94 76.59 14.68 -8.48 =17.95 10 9.25 .68 -88.65 4.79 6.94 76.59 .65 .85 -5.89 14.68 8.48 -17.95 11 .42 -1.27 -6.16 -4.27 -8.20 -88.38 3.85 -7.48 76.59 .00 -16.95 -17.95 12 -8.40 . .68 76.32 -1.07 .14 -5.89 -5.21 7.66 -88.38 -14.68 8.48 -17.95 Foundation Design Loads: UPLIk-T = 95.79 kips. Shear/Leg - 10.45 kips at Load Case 3 DOWNLOAD= 109.20 kips. Shear/Leg - 11.49 kips at Load Case 4 Max. OTM= 1072.63 ft -kip. Total Shear= 18.32 kips at Load Case 4 Max. WGT= 17.95 kips. DATE: 10-27-1997 TIME: 8:51:52 PAGE 9 FWT INC. P. O. BOX 8597. FORT WORTH, TX 76124-0597 Analysis 6 Design of 86. -FT Tower per EIA/TIA/RS222-E Design for 75. MPH Wind; .00 Inch Ice. Operate at 50. mph wind; .00 Inch Ice. Location: CA -0713B, CHICO, CA JOB NO.: 15393 Customer: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Engineer: PS/UMA DESIGN NO.: 97-4022A Design Date: 10/16/97 Revision No.: 0 Section Top Top Face Bay Brace Weight Number El.ev Width Size Type (lb) 1 86.00 4.00 6.00 X1 392.3 2 80.00 4.00 5.00 X1 1267.4 3 60.00 6.00 6.67 X1 1713.2 4 40.00 8.00 6.67 X1 2046.7 5 20.00 10.00 6.67 X1 2587.9 6 .00 12.00 Est. Total -Tower Weight (Incl. Bolts, Splice .Plates and Galvanizing) 8007.5 LB rE: 10-27-1997 0 TIME: 8:51:52 PAGE 10 0 tiT INC. P. O. BOX 8597. FORT WORTH, TX 76124-0597 Analysis & Design of 86. -FT Tower per EIA/TIA/RS222-E sign for 75. MPH Wind; .00 Inch Ice. Operate at 50. mph wind; .00 Inch Ice. JOB NO.: 15393 _ cation: CA -0713B, CHICO, CA Engineer: PS/UMA Customer: 11EXTEL COMMUNICATIONS DESIGN NO.: 97-4022A Design Date: 10/16/97 Revision No.: 0 T O W F.. R D E S I G N S U M M A R Y ALLOWABLE LOADS ARE INCREASED BY 1.333 Yield Stress: Legs.- 50 ksi; Bracing - 36 ksi. ;CIULeg Angle. SL = Short Leg Vertical. LL = Long Leg Vertical. TC - Tension Capacity. TL -Tension Load. 'ompal ression Capacity. CL = Compression Load. C O M P R E S S I O N I T E N S I G N I I I j ! F. M B E R D A T A I KL/r Cc CL/CCI TL TC I A325 r 1 I F. S C R I P T Z O N 1 CL I(kips) (kips) I(kips) (kips) I I -BOLTS I I e 11'y1' I I--•-1 D - I 3.1 144.0 30.2 I .101 .2 39.1 ?I 4-5/8 I 1Lt;'; 1 2" SOLID ROD 1 2.0 102.1 12.1 .171 2.0 7.3 TI 1-5/B I ID'IA I1L2 X 2 X 3/16 1 113.3 10.7 .001 .0 7.3 TI 1-5/8 I 1HOR I1L2 X 2 X 3/16 I .0 I I I -SPL I PI. 9"m x 3/4" I I I I 3. -SPL I PL 9"m x 3/4" I 1 I I -IEi-: 1 SOLID ROD II 1 30.6 120.2 43.3 .711 25.9 39.1 ?I 2.8 7.3 TI 4-5/8 1 1-5/8 I 1D"� 12" 111.2 X 2 X 3/16 I 3.0 112.9 10.6 .281 1 1 I 1 P:. 9"a+ x 3/4" I 1 1 1 3•.:ISP'L I pL 9 1/2"m x 3/4" 1 1 1 1 I 1 2 1/2" SOLID ROD II I 57.4 128.2 59.5 .971 48.9 92.0 ?) 9.6 7.3 TI 6-5/8 I 1-5/8 I 1C(A 11.12 X 2 X 3/16 I 4.8 150.0 6.3 .761 1 I I 7?-SI'L I PL 9 1/2"m x 3/4" I I I I BUT SPL I L'L 10 1/2"4, x 1" I 1 I I 1LE_G I 12 3/4" SOLID ROD II I 8 5.1 116.6 87.0 .981 74.1 124.9 ?I 4.4 7.3 TI 6-3/4 I 1-5/8 I IDiA I1L2 X 2 X 3/16 I 4.3 174.2 4.7 .911 I 1 I P-SI'L I PL 10 1/2"0 x 1" I I 1 I B(.!r-SHL I PL 12"0 x 1 1/4"II I .1 I I 3" SOLID ROD 1105.9 106.8 123.3 .861 92.6 161.3 ?I 3.8 8.2 B1 6-1 1/4 1-5/8 11.EG 11:(A 1 I1L2 1/2 X 2 1/2 X 3/16 1 4.0 159.2 7.1 .56i P -SPL I pl. 12"m x 1 1/4" 1 1 1 I 50'1' --SPL I PL 13"0 x 1 1/4" I I I _I _I THK. II ANCHOR BOLTS: TO TOP OF ANCHOR PLA 6-1 1/4"m x 5'- 1" TE V .OR PLATE: 13"4 x 1^ ? .- Estimated Tension I.oad based on 908 of Leg Compression Capacity for an Unbraced Length of 5 feet. T - Block Shear Controls S - Bolt Shear Controls. B - Bearing Controls DATE: 10-27-1997 TIME: 8:51:52 PAGE 11 FWT INC. P. 0. BOX 8597. FORT WORTH, TX.76124-0597 Analysis 6 Design of 86. -FT Tower per EIA/TIA/RS222-E Design for 75. MPH Wind; .00 Inch Ice. Operate at 50. mph wind; .00 Inch Ice. Location: CA -0713B, CHICO, CA JOB NO.•: 15393 Customer: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Engineer: PS/UMA DESIGN NO.: 97-4022A Design Date: 10/16/97 Revision No.: 0 M A X I M U M D I S P L A C E M E N T S O F T 0 W E R C E N T E R L I N E WIND SPEED = 50. MPH, ICE _ .00 INCHES ELEV C.G DISP SWAY TWIST (feet) (Inches) Case (Deg) Case (Deg) Case 0 86.0 1.571 4 .147 4 .042 3 M 80.0 1.392 4 .145 4 .049 5 M 75.0 1.222 4 .140 4 .046 3 70.0 1.087 4 .133 4 .040 5 65.0 .931 4 .122 4 .041 5 O 60.0 .818 4 .112 4 .035 5 0 53.3 .641 4 .100 4 .035 5 M 46.7 .514 4 .088 4 026 5 M 40.0 .372 4 .074 4 .024 6 33.3 .275 4 .062 4 .014 5 26.7 .175 4 .049 4 .013 6 20.0 .108 4 .035 4 .005 5 13.3 .053 4 .024 4 .005 6 6.7 .018 2 .012 4 .003 8 M --> MICROWAVE ANTENNA LEVEL O --> NON -MICROWAVE ANTENNA LEVEL Elevations are measured from Tower Base 1901 East Loop 820 South P -O. Box 8597 Fort Worth, Texas 76112.7899 Fort Worth, Texas 76124.0597 Fax 817.429.60 10 1-800-433-1816 817-457.3060 Exhibit "J" Certified Letters To Other Carriers • `i�'� 'Ff K' -g +f`i T+2 Tt �-c' 1 fi al. xt i� h�•tS,3'9i A '�' : T��'`. ,.• ��1$r'POSta�°SErVICe��•� x c��t rt�N�'•,r%� f,? � ! �� � ��a. ,� (Dom � hc�sMa}IkOjnly, No,Ynsurance�CoveragerProwded); �j Postage $ 33 CDHj4D Certified Fee=Return Receipt Fee 02 (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required)TotafPostage &Fees $ q C FRZIent'sNName(Please Print Clearly) (To be completed by mailer) •- -- •--•---•---�J/ r a C C R Lr C C M ^0 �� ,a.�i ,ifr a�tir7dE5k is 'kx `� �,t A2+ ' n i a•+ a r�q'sq.+t` tv^' �..�le» � ���'(Do estic'�Mai%'Only'�IVo %nsu`rance u"�1s#'r;:€Y;•}y'�ws�Ne�h?,.",. G ve a'r e�Pro`v led `� 4t" ���; �'��DomesticiMail OnlX�riNo3�Insurartce��C�o-vera>ge�P,�rov�d�d)� •§3'-il�i,:cf6e`*�i.���,".T�%�°+94 ?9, „�'� NW� q �i.�'.�d$1*Sy�erv�r�A�iS.. A�.Xk�f+'.�� ua s .'r''�'.3�`s�:���1.`-.��t�•��'G-P)�4��rz..�!�Vr_�v1� -c�b+,>:�S n...;6... �thkrr�'rs.°. 's'-ft�x5�;iv"..d�C Ir Postage . AICO Er Postage $ . ■Certified Fee �Z6 (Endprsement Required) / Her ♦� Return Receipt Fee ! Here CO (Endorsement Required) E:3 Total Postage & Fees (-3 Restricted Delivery Fee . (Endorsement Required) C:3 Postage & Fees � r M Total M • i ------------- . ■ Box No. I - r a C C R Lr C C M ^0 `°"rYH �+}$ X',■ ai`r,.'"J•Y, & C'a.Y w�'+r'a• c!•i' t s .+� � ���'(Do estic'�Mai%'Only'�IVo %nsu`rance u"�1s#'r;:€Y;•}y'�ws�Ne�h?,.",. G ve a'r e�Pro`v led `� 4t" J{����ep, t3:F{a+!rd'�=ij�-4tt.{. Ir Postage . AICO ■Certifj6d Fee . �� (Endprsement Required) / Her ♦� C:3 Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) , I , r E:3 Total Postage & Fees a ru ame (Please Print Clearly) (To be completed -bymalla M • i ------------- • VOLCC Program Management LCC International, Inc. 140 Independence Circle Suite A Chico, CA 95973 Tel: (530) 897-5005 Fax: (530) 897-5007 June 27, 2000 Pacific Bell Wireless Services P.O. Box 755 Atwater, CA 95301 (800) 574-7000 Dear Sir or Madam: As required by the Butte County Minor Use Permit Application Procedure, we are hereby giving you notice of our intent to co -locate our PCS antennas on the following towers located in Butte County: 1. American Tower located on Hwy 99 in Gridley, CA 2. American Tower located on 5646 Lincoln Blvd., Oroville, CA 3. American Tower located on 8222 Schalf Drive, Chico, CA 4. Spectrasite located on 3902 Esplanade, Chico, CA 5. Spectrasite Tower in Oroville, CA Sincerely, Messeret Yilma Zoning Specialist — LCC International 0 • Program Management LCC International, Inc. 140 Independence Circle Suite A Chico, CA 95973 Tel: (530) 897-5005 Fax: (530) 897-5007 June 27, 2000 Nextel Communications 2001 Edmund Halley Dr. Reston, VA 20191 Dear Sir or Madam: As required by the Butte County Minor Use Permit Application Procedure,:we are hereby giving. you notice of our intent to co -locate our PCS antennas=on7the following towers located in Butte County: 1. American Tower located on Hwy 99 in Gridley, CA 2. American Tower located on 5646 Lincoln Blvd., Oroville, CA 3. American Tower located on 8222 Schalf Drive, Chico, CA 4. Spectrasite located on 3902 Esplanade, Chico, CA 5. Spectrasite Tower in Oroville, CA Sincerely, Messeret Yilma Zoning Specialist — LCC International LCC Program Management LCC International, Inc. 140 Independence Circle Suite A Chico, CA 95973 Tel: (530) 897-5005 Fax: (530) 897-5007 June 27, 2000 AT&T Wireless Services P.O. Box 3611 Bothell, Washington 98041-3611 (800) 462-4463 Dear Sir or Madam: As required by the Butte County Minor Use Permit Application• Procedure; we are hereby giving you notice of our intent to co -locate our PCS antennas on the following towers located in Butte County: 1. American Tower located on Hwy 99 in Gridley, CA 2. American Tower located on 5646 Lincoln Blvd., Oroville, CA 3. American Tower located on 8222 Schalf Drive, Chico, CA 4. Spectrasite located on 3902 Esplanade, Chico, CA 5. Spectrasite Tower in Oroville, CA Sincerely, qYt:�iq,4, Yo„q Messeret Yilma Zoning Specialist — LCC International LCC Program Management LCC International, Inc. 140 Independence Circle Suite A Chico, CA 95973 Tel: (530) 897-5005 Fax: (530) 897-5007 June 27, 2000 Airtouch Communications One California Street San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 658-2000 Dear Sir or Madam: As required by the Butte County Minor Use Perrimit Application.Procedure; we are hereby giving you notice o£our intent to co -locate our PCS antennas on the following towers located in Butte County: 1., American Tower located on Hwy 99 in Gridley, CA 2. American Tower located on 5646 Lincoln Blvd., Oroville, CA 3. American Tower located on 8222 Schalf Drive, Chico, CA 4. Spectrasite located on 3902 Esplanade, Chico, CA 5. Spectrasite Tower in Oroville, CA Sincerely, Messeret Yilma Zoning Specialist — LCC International • Exhibit "K" • ATC - FAA Determination Letter Ov'�CI IED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION '• ANTENNA STRUCTURE REGISTRATION wner.. SpectraSite Communications, Inc. u\;J CA-Onr3 This registration is effective upon completion of the described antenna structure and notification to fahe Commission. YOU MUST NOTIFY THE COMMISSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OR CANCELLATION OF YOUR PROJECT. Use FCC Form 854. To file electronically, connect to the antenna structure registration system by pointing your web browser to http://www.fcc.gov/wtb/antenna. Electronic filing is recommended. You may also file manually by submitting a paper copy of FCC Form 854. Use purpose code ":VT" for notification of completion of construction; use purpose code "CA" to cancel your registration. The Antenna Structure Registration is not an authorization to construct radio facilities or transmit radio signals. ;if is necessary that all radio equipment on this structure be covered by a valid FCC license or construction permit. You must immediately provide a copy of this Registration to all tenant licensees "and permittees sited on the structure described on this Registration (although not required, you may want to use Certified Mail to obtain prpof of receipt), and display your Registration Number at the site. See reverse for important information about the Commission's Antenna Structure Registration rules. 30 .. FCC 8549 July 1999 Registration Number: VIELKA M. GABRIEL 1061341 SpectraSite Communications, Inc. 100 Regency Forest Drive, Suite 400 Cary, NC 27511 Issue Date: 01-24-2000 Location of Antenna Structure: Ground Elevation (AMSL): 3902 ESPLANADE AVE 53.3 meters CHICO, CA Overall Height Above Ground (AGL): 30.5 meters Latitude Longitude Overall Height Above Mean Sea Level (A MSL): I ']0-A'7-'7^7 nM 1 DiI-G'2-Ia M.1 01 0 This registration is effective upon completion of the described antenna structure and notification to fahe Commission. YOU MUST NOTIFY THE COMMISSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OR CANCELLATION OF YOUR PROJECT. Use FCC Form 854. To file electronically, connect to the antenna structure registration system by pointing your web browser to http://www.fcc.gov/wtb/antenna. Electronic filing is recommended. You may also file manually by submitting a paper copy of FCC Form 854. Use purpose code ":VT" for notification of completion of construction; use purpose code "CA" to cancel your registration. The Antenna Structure Registration is not an authorization to construct radio facilities or transmit radio signals. ;if is necessary that all radio equipment on this structure be covered by a valid FCC license or construction permit. You must immediately provide a copy of this Registration to all tenant licensees "and permittees sited on the structure described on this Registration (although not required, you may want to use Certified Mail to obtain prpof of receipt), and display your Registration Number at the site. See reverse for important information about the Commission's Antenna Structure Registration rules. 30 .. FCC 8549 July 1999 You must comply with all applicable FCC obstruction marking and lighting requirements, as set forth in Part 17' of the Commission's Rules (47 C.F.R. Part 17). These rules include, but are not limited to: • Posting the Registration Number: The Antenna Structure Registration Number must be displayed in a conspicuous place so that it is readily visible near the base of the antenna structure. Materials used to -•display•the Registration Number must be weather -resistant and of sufficient size to be -easily seen at the base of the antenna structure. Exceptions exist for certain historic structures. See 47 C.F.R. 17.5(g) -(h). • Inspecting• lights and equipment.,. The obstruction lighting must be observed at least every 24 hours in order to detect any outages or malfunctions. Lighting equipment, indicators, •and.associated devices must be inspected at least once every three months. • Reporting outages and malfunctions: When -any top steady -burning light or. a .flashing light (in any position) burns out or malfunctions, the outage must be reported to the nearest FAA Flight Service Station, unless corrected within 30 minutes. The FAA must again be notified when'the light is restored. The owner must also maintain a log of these outages and malfunctions. • Maintaining assigned painting: The antenna structure must be repainted as often as necessary to maintain good visibility. • Complying with environmental rules: If you certified that grant of this registration would not have a significant environmental impact, you must nevertheless maintain all pertinent records and be•ready to provide documentation supporting this certification and compliance with the rules, in the event that such information is requested by the Commission pursuant to 47 C.F.R. 1.1307(d). • Updating information: The owner must notify the FCC of proposed modifications to this structure; of any change in ownership; or, within 30 days of dismantlement of the structure. Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations (which contain the FCC's antenna structure registration rules, 47 C.=.R. Part 17) are available from the Government Printing Office (GPO). To purchase CFR volumes, call (202) 512-1600. For GPO Customer Service, call (202) 512-1803. For additional FCC information, consult the Antenna Homepage on the Internet at http://www.fcc.gov/wtb/antenna or call the FCC's National Call Center at 1-888-CALLFCC (1-888-225-5322). We have estimated the third party burden requirement associated with this collection to be 1 hour. 'This requirement has been identified under OMB control number of 3060-0139. FCC 854R July 1999 i1PPrt,ve0 Ubt,i r46. 2120-0001 eronaulical Study Number �� Notice of sed Construction or Alteration Its rr•r,rlr,v,}nl r� t.rrns,,rr: rr:r.' Failure To Provide All Requested Information May Delay Processing 01 Your Notice n Fedowl Aviation Administration �•� �' _ oGi _Nature of Proposal _-_ 2. Complete Description of Structure C. Work Schedule Dates _ Please describe the proposed construction or alteration. N Con51rUChnn [XI Porinanenl Beginning A. For proposals involving transmitting stations, include L ..Icralion * CI Temporary (Duration months) End effective radiated power (ERP) and assigned frequency. II - -- -- - -'------- not known, give frequency band and maximum ERP. II Alteration, provide previous FAA Aeromitilic:al Sturdy Number, if available: — '-- - -- ' ' -"—'- - -----' - B. For proposals involving overhead wire, transmission lines, A. Name, address, and lelephonc number ofindividuat, company corporation, etc. proposing the etc., include the size and the configuration of the wires and construe ion or aflerahonm . (Nuber, wot, City. Slate, and Zip Code) their supporting structures. -feather Granni s C. For buildings, include site orientation, dimensions, and Nextel Communications construction materials. 2180 Harvard Street, Suite 100 D.Optional— Describe the type of obstruction marking and ( SarLramento CA_958.1 4 • (91 6) 568 4486 lighting system desired. The FAA will consider this in their Area Code Tetep0onc Number study. 805-821 M rf z R 851-866 MHz T B. Name, address and telephone number of proponent's representative, if different than 3A. above. WALTER WULFF & Associates 100 watts P.O. Box 914 Site: 713B Point Clear, AL 36564 334-990-2502 (27) 39 47'27" N 121 53'35"W l ) ---- 3902 Esplanade Ave, Area Code Telephone Number , Location Of Structure 5. Height and Elevation Ilonearestlooll Coordinates 11ifhundredths or seconds. B. Nearest City or Town and Slate C. Nearest public or military airport, heliport, flightpark, or seaplane base A. Elevation of ground above mean sea level. aGtude 0 --� --- �r 39 1 47 126,58 Chico CA CIC . 175 ongitude 0 r n I I1. Distance to 48 11). Distance from structure to nearest B. Height of structure including all 121 53 38 93 point of nearest runway appurtenances and lighting above 1.4 NM ground or water. 1 0 0 D. Source for item 4A data. (2.). Direction to 46 (2). Direction from structure to airport C. Overall height above mean sea level —} USGS 7.5' Otner ® Survey Ouad Chart Specify Northeast 275 e reference datum. 4E. Description of site location with respect to highways, street, airports, prominent terrain, features, Nither -.,;D 27 NAD 83 1:1 existing9 structures, etc. Please attach a U.S. Geological SurveyMa (orequivalent)showin the construction g —, Specify site. It available, attach a copy of a documented site survey with te surveyor's certification. I 'olice is required by Pal 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations 114 C.F.R. Pall 77) pursuant to Section 1101 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended (49 U.S.C. app. § 1501). Persons who nov:ingly and willfully violalpi0thin Notice requirements of Part 77 are subject to a civil penalty of $1,000 per day until the notice is received, pursuant to Section 901(a) of the Federal Aviation Act of 958. as amended(49 U.S C �T1(ap as well as the fine (criminal penalty) of not more than $500 for the first offense and not more than 52.000 for subsequent offenses, to Section xby)% pursuant 02(a) of Ir}e Federal Aviaof•.: s amended (49 U.S.C. app § 1472(a)). HEREBY CERT , �t ty e�fwe statements made by me are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge. In addition, I '•A ' `1ii%gj tgree to obstru Rpt df tructure in accordance with established marking & lighting standards as necessary. -are `C` yo P'°M�� v l�p•pl Person Filing NOlice Si nalur 9/27/9 I �<�'� �F�pYY alter H. Wulff =OR I=AA`USE ONLYr :?' .: S ..: �:;r::�;::.;;;.'•::._� :'.� . �,,.� a'�,—— .:i= r K I° s.� fAA wdl eith r returri,this,form or issue a separate ack' o dgement::tj :.. f he 'Pro OSaI:.'..; l., C • �C ppleirie'ri�al Notice.ol,Construclion; FAA`Foirn 7460.2, is required any lime Project is abandone , or, oes riot require a nofci io PAA E' ., , tl`r:`.: Al least 48 fioufi.belore the start'ot tonstrucbon ':, , : ; T,; , .. " . _.•"[ ♦ t 8 Ili n n r :. ��... .. - - Is not idem ed as a obstruction u de any standard of FAR, Part 71; : ; ;' Wilhtn Itve da s aRerlh'e cdnstiliction'reaches its greale'st Right." - . : r `•unless:. "°` "''' ` ` C and would not be a hazard t air n vi ti :... ;. ...:. Subpart o a ga on. -' ,•:: • +•.;,,+:;::�:Thisdetermination ;expires ori ; • (a(ezlended, ieJjsed or ferri,irjated by the issusing offce, Is identified as an obstruUion under the standards of FAfi. Part 77 ' . > (b) me conshuchon is sublec(to the, hcerumg'autho6l bi the Federal Cornmunicabons Con ilmtsston (FCC) and an application Subpart C, but would not be a hazard to air navigation.: " ' :' (or'a copstcuction ffhi(is made to the FCC ori or.before the above expiialion date. In'such;casi ilia delerininalion ;: ., . �r� 7 e?pires on the daleyrescnbed 6y the-FCG for completion of,conslr'uctiori .bion the date the FCC genie's th'e'applicalion: a 0 marked a is a:;� e ;:- : -•-. ,'s: Should be obstruction lighted per FAA .,, ,-; r P ., ,:.::::;•.; :, ,, ,, ,r, NOTE Request for exten5 or) of the effective penod of Ihts delermmabon roust be, postmarked oj,delivered,lo the Issuing office. dvisory Circular 70r7460..i; Chapters ` at least t 5 days pooro lf�e exptrabon tlale q t ' r i ` }x •. ....:. ..:. .:,. .c: : .: •.`.>; 1. ..d. -a :..,,a s. , _:�.,..., ..etc-r,....r:-.•'. f,:rJ', -.. -.., ;.,T:..... .:. -•.- . ,. - piE�sf' r - _•:'j:2:-:��::7; ' , ObslrucUon marking and kghhng are not necessary. ;:, . ,.: , ( rr II the shucl�re is"su eel low iicenstng aulhonfy of Ure FCC, a copy' til This determination wdl be sent to Nal agency_. . I {.. :::if;\: -:'•C. �fr:'�L'�,,'.r :^ �'.'f,f 1.Y _s.`v :`crii V7:"tit �;•.•.:�•-�.[... rt: e:-iv..+;;:u:1•[`:yv �:•��.�tr�{'.-. .�. temarks' ti'+,..... tit,.'[%'i v' `�.•. y ..� ••:T. •apt` ,r s,t j: _ `•i' - - . C` %:�.� r..a•• _i, t'v`'_.;� r Tl:..: .fir. q s• : L'�':e •' 'a }L' •�. r ,: , �%`��' .. ::�+�1 ,'�•iY � s . i i!} t�43„`t '�.} � 11+A} Yttt•7'�i r 7�� v �j � �.dtt + ,j��_i yo r':`J ,:•. r�, . � � �efys• c '. y 'r •,t � � ri{ � r�f ;, 'f�5� .0 �_ .• t ,��r� tJ�t t: 1v�.r �C� �-i�^ � ?C� r � �,� ��t.'r,ii,s'rP`,1.y".F y ,roy������ • ,; 4"J �;. _%�. �` C Srr� t Y -Y i �••J-'C'i.' •.�j_�g.'{�. .T _ -li -C- �8i'� Amy �V{'{l.�i}, �.- ��S ..\ „r'I„ 7 r_ 5�...-_'_•4• E"' t ,ilr rr•:.',�.�j,`-t� '4rn:K ^Z .�L i.S,� pit i%� Ar.' ��.rL._T,t�S�'.!._. 7.II3h �. �Ci 2.:i �'; _; M`.: .,��e;;- }. fi e.{e•_'a'Sa..:r r„ . jllse Ihese coo�dinales for any u; r „ `r^4� 5Coordinatesu+recorrespondencewdhNeFAA) W-1-'r.P•�-- ''A '. n :CIn _..,. ..._.� ._• ;� Latltu a A�(1 IUe ' ? . 9 .,aom- t��I- signature Date AA Form 7460.1 15.941 Supersedes Previous Ed,lion r NSN: 0052-00-012-0001 -V.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OrrICE: 1995-666.473 L'loase Type or Print on This Form • *Form Approved OMB N0. 2120-0001 V 9D Aeronautical Study Number 1- - (Notice of Proposed Constru.0irr n or Alteration :UI::t llZi ti inisrrati Failure To Provide All Requested In. rmatiun May May Processing Of Your Notice j � Lv ,_ �, (9 6, _ G� rot Avlallon Administration LL `t ""` re of Proposal 2. Com_ Icte_Descri tion of Structure ----.._..-'---.. _ _......_... - - -' -' — P —�'--- I yr- R. Clang C. work Schedule Dates Please describe the proposed construction or alteration. yI New Consuuction PermanentBeginning A. For proposals involving transmitting stations, include Alteration * _ ❑ Temporary (Duration months) End effective radiated power (ERP) and assigned frequency. If If Alteration, provide previous FAA Aeronautical Study Number, if available not known, give frequency band and maximum ERP. B. For proposals involving, overhead wire, transmission lines, Name, address, and telephone number of individual, company corporation, etc. proposing the etc., include the size and the configuration of the wires and conslrnctlon or alteration. (Number, Street. City, State, and Zip Code( their supporting structures. Heather Granni s C. For buildings, include site orientation, dimensions, and Nextel Communications construction materials. 2180 Harvard Street, Suite 100 D. optional— Describe the type of obstruction marking and lighting system desired. The FAA will consider this in their ( Sacramento ---CA 9581 4 ( 91 6 ) 568 4486 study. Area Codo 1 clepTonc Number _ 805-821 bl H Z R Name, address and telephone number of proponent's representative, if different than 3A. above. 851-866 MH Z T WALTER WULFF & Associates 100 watts P.O. Box 914 Site: 713B Point Clear, AL 36564 334-990-2502 (27) 39 47'27" N 121 53'35"W ( ) ' 3902 Esplanade Ave. Area Code Telephone Number Location Of Structure 5. Height and Elevation (tonearestlooi) Coordinates (to ndi drhs or seconds. if B. Nearest City or Town Stale C. Nearest public or military airport, heliport, flightpark, or seaplane base A. Elevation of ground above mean sea level. lidtde 0 Itand r 39 47 26.58_ Chico, CA CIC 175 nr ilude 0 �/ rr (1). Distance to 40 (1). Distance from structure to nearest B. Height of structure including all 121 53 38 point of nearest runway appurtenances and lighting above .93 _-- ___ _ 1-4 NM ground or water. 1 0 0 ,ource for item hA data. (2). Direction from structure to airport S 7.5' Other Survey (2). Direction to 48 _ _ _ _ _ C. Overall height above mean sea level I Chart Specify Northeast 275 catethe referencedatum. 4E. Description of site location with respect to highways, street, airports, prominent terrain, features, f� Other J NAD 27 OX NAD 83 [:]Specify existing structures, etc. Please attach a U.S. Geological SurveyMa orequivalent)showin the construction gg site. It available, attach a copy of a documented site survey with the surveyor's certification. Lice is req:lired by Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. Part 771 pursuant to Section 1101 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended (49 U.S.C. app. § 1501(. Persons who mingly and willfully violate the Notice requirements of Part 77 are subject to a civil penalty of $1,000 per day until the notice is received, pursuant to Section 901(a) of the Federal Aviation Act of 38. as amended (49 U.S.C. app § 1,17 Ila)) as erelt as the linr, (:5-ir..I! p coal;,,) of not more than $500 for the first offense and not more than 52.000 lot subsequent ollenses, pursuant to Section 21al of the Federal Aviatim, Act o: 1950, as amend^d (49 U.S C a;,:) `; t .72f: !i iEREBY CERTIFY that all of the a!,ove st:llenlents made by me arc true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge. In addition, I ;:�:.= to G1:et:nrrlir±r. rn;lr4 tirlA!r.r lint:l 1i,r. Q Ino::l l;ia i:': :.-dUrrianCA v: ith'c±ctahlich rl raarkinn R Iinh Iinn si;,nria:'rig As. rar.Pccar;;. 1 i i THIS WILL ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION. IT HAS BEEN ASSIGNED THE STUDY NUMBER INDICATED ABOVE. YOU MAY EXPECT A WRITTEN AIRSPACE DETERMINATION RESPONSE WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 45 TO 60 DAYS. Il l l • '.'^c`c„�'-_< ,,;,.;. u `t'ra�m.T,-".T'r`r'T'.'n'v_r.��.,a?;�R!�. ./i �;:,.;�, - ���:�-'• ..l' r'�:= ,. •.r.'�_ 1 I �,-, ter. ,; , �` S:, �!'.,r LQ•. i;d:' :'S' :'.L�.. :yti� r.r.:•, .. r..,� <.7�P'.'ih`J-.-,C:!'fi...:. C.•.�:.i�"r:.<•�,.r..,�,af...•..kkA: k rte -s;,:,:. :it,..'•r1'ts;- '-;S' '.i! :.<:s lir"�!';:. �:STtu''x::.�d'�-• :,._• ; r+i.'3'i!i,A+'e�i�•-; G'' . ,; ':3 ."n'ig's:fu...dt�r.•.5,. iw! w. ' k:':fM oordinat,,e.. s lu�lsuerethceosrCiecsofiG�,si= esi3r:'. <a;i .. c Y1 ` i 'a•r�',:�. c°� •�rc��: � LatUdhvAe lioeinddineahlcee3 �.: vrr �" . ; r .4 a ,�y:3 In I Signatere Date Exhibit "L" Scinetics Engineering Report Port�A 'Storage a APN 006-400-0� P to W Lattice Tower I f7��, '.A.•r:` It a�.- •� _Y gill l�iii41 _.�,..r'L7�:,"r:j'+f�f��'t.•"Gcy F * `�� Kt� ,�! � ot������\� ��C"�'"��:�,._�rs}^civ' . j�.i F y! � ��,y.�p��y�r�~c wa ...a .7 •'"'t Jn. .i y A r \" l `'� 7 .. ` . � .�1��,.y� A l`�r Fr•�.���:�� �F� '�" � �''V ��.� !v�� .tom'?� : ��'.� �' � •- / . yit.+ r fsif•+` . ;..i,.•��S�Y . ,�, yj ft ,�, - . � 3� �+\'S .71j 74 + cC` sr.-"i„R i 't•Sfn +. '� i 54a .p •�•y.r ' i �t - 's • s � T r� 4 t „",.,,�'4lK, t.�'%��t,6Y��„� �r.."t 1';�2i t _f � �i' ' . •I K. rj1 J� r � i±'f ,i tE� �r��r � SK_.r. 4'T^?.. -.j :wr��,.�,.�, �t�t �, .4 i• �'� �( 0 0101.111 toE►[• 1 `�� ' ° L -'i`r�y�' '',� s� ''' jai+��,'•'• _ iq] i ,. . © ► \22. ■ r•, + rl.ii II y L1Y i n GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT for a N D(TEL COMMUNICATION TOWER SITE SITE #CA -0713B SYCAMORE CREEK SITE File: Site ##: Frepai-ed for: Section: 3 Smart SMR of California dba NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 2180 Harvard .Street, Suite 220 Sacramento, CA 95815 o ?,pF E s1 q wo. 2 : ! m Exp. I OCTOBER 6, 1997. Robert Young & Associates GEOTECHNICAL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FOR SAFE, ECONOMICAL STRUCTURES • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description 1.2 Scope of Investigation 2. SITE INVESTIGATION 2.1 Surface Conditions 2.2 Seismicity 2.3 Subsurface Conditions 3. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 Site Preparation 3.2 Type of Foundation for Tower 3.3 Design Parameters for Tower Foundation 3.4 Building Foundations 3.5 Slabs -on -grade 3.6 Trench ' Backfill 3.7 Engineeered Fill 3.8 Drainage 3.9 Settlement 3.10 Temporary Slopes 4. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION 5. LIMITATIONS PLATES: 1. Site Location 2. Site Plan 3. Uniform Soil Classification 4. Log of Exploratory Boring S. Site Photos L 1. INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a geotechnical investigation for a proposed ebinmiunications tower to be located northwest of the town of Chico in Butte County, Califorpia. The purpose of the investigation was to evaluate the surface and subsurface soil materials and based on these findings to recommend the type of foundation and relevant engineering parameters to be used in the design of the foundation. This report includes the results of the site reconnaissance and analysis and the resulting recommendations. 1.1 Project Description The project consists of the erection of a 80 to 110 foot high, three legged, steel lattice communication tower and associated structures. No other site work is planned. Plate 1, "Site Location" shows where the project site is located relative to the town of Chico, State Highway 99, and other county roads. Plate 2, "Site Plan" shows the location of the geotechnical testing relative to the proposed lease site, The Esplanade, a gravel driveway, existing buildings, and property lines. 1.2 Scope of Investigation The scope of this investigation consisted of the following: 1. A review of available geologic maps and literature to identify any geological or seismic features that could affect the project. 2. A surface reconnaissance of the site to further identify features that could affect the project. 3. A subsurface investigation consisting of logging and sampling of one exploratory boring excavated near the proposed tower site. 4. Laboratory testing of samples taken from the exploratory boring, consisting of classification tests to predict engineering behavior. S. The preparation of this report. • , This report was prepared in accordance with generally accepted soils and foundation engineering practices applicable at the time the report was prepared. No other warranties either expressed or implied are made as to the professional advice provided. The recommendations made are based on our observations during the surface and subsurface investigations and laboratory test results. The scope of this investigation did not include any environmental assessment or investigation for the presence or absence of wetlands, hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, surface water or groundwater. 2. SITE INVESTIGATION The subsurface investigation was performed on October 4, 1997. The investigation consisted of drilling one exploratory boring with a truck mounted drill rig with hollow flight augers. The depth of the exploratory boring was 20.E feet. The materials encountered in the boring were sampled using a 2 inch I.D. split spoon sampler with brass inserts, driven 18 inches using a 30 inch drop from a 140 pound hammer. The blow counts for the last 12 inches were recorded, converted to standard penetration resistance, and shown on the boring log. The samples were logged and classified according to.the Unified Soil Classification System (Plate 3).- When ):When over 50 blows were counted for less than 6 inches of penetration, the inches of_. penetration were noted. The location of the exploratory boring is shown on Plate 2. (The location shown is not based on survey and is therefore approximate.) Detailed descriptions of the materials encountered in the boring are presented on the boring log, Plate 4. 2.1 Surface Conditions The lease site for the three legged tower was located on a parcel that, at the time of the investigation was being used for a Port -a -Storage facility. The site was at the southeast corner of the parcel and was relatively level and covered with a 6 inch laver of aggregate base surfacing. The parcel was surrounded by agricultural fields and fenced on three sides. 2.2 Seismicity There is a relatively short unnamed active fault 36 miles southeast of the site Geotechnical Report for Nextel Site CA -071313, Sycamore Creek/Page 2 The Big Bend Fault lies 20 miles to the east of the site and the Willows Fault is located 20 miles southwest of the site. These are classified as Pre-Quarternary faults (no movement within the last 2 million years)' . There are also several unnamed Pre- Quarternary faults within a 20 mile radius of the site. One is located 12 miles south, one is 17 miles west, a group of 8 short ones is located 6 miles east, and a group of 12 is located 7 miles northeast of the site. Faults in this category should not be considered dead. Evidence of recent movement may not have been observed or it may be covered by younger rocks or deposits. Our field investigation did not uncover any evidence of fault movement. The 1994 Uniform Building Code, shows the site in Seismic Zone 3. 2.3 Subsurface Conditions The subsurface soil encountered in the exploratory boring consisted of a 6 inch surface layer of imported aggregate base, underlain by a moist, hard, silty clay with gravel which extended to a depth of about 3 feet. Underlying that was a moist, stiff, clayey silt extending to a depth of about 10 feet. A layer of moist, silty gravel with cobbles was below this to a depth of 17 feet, followed by a moist, dense, clayey sand, which extended to the maximum depth explored of 20.5 feet. Groundwater was not encountered in the exploratory boring. It should be noted that groundwater conditions may fluctuate depending on rainfall and/or runoff conditions not apparent at the time of -this investigation. 3. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of the field investigation, laboratory testing, analysis and our understanding of the project, from a geotechnical standpoint the project may be developed essentially as planned. Detailed recommendations. follow. These recommendations are based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the locations of the borings and should not be extrapolated to other areas or used for other facilities without our prior review. 3.1 Site Preparation The existing aggregate base may be used for surfacing for the lease site. We recommend that this material be tested to verify that it meets compaction requirements of the project; ie that is compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D1557. ' Fault Map of California, Charles W. Jennings, California Division of Mines and Geology, 1975 Geotechnical Report for Nextel Site CA -071313, Sycamore Creek/Page 3 3.2 Type of Foundation for Tower The type of tower foundation recommended for this site is one drilled and poured in place caisson under each of the three legs of the lattice tower. Each caisson should be designed to resist uplift and downward forces as well as lateral forces from tower loading. The foundation parameters to be used for design are shown in section 3.3 below. The subsurface materials should be excavable with a backhoe, caisson drilling rig or similar equipment. 3.3 Design Parameters for Tower Foundations a. Allowable Caisson skin friction: For both uplift and downward loading: 600 pounds per square foot for long term dead and live loading 750 pounds per square foot for short term loading including wind and seismic Neglect upper five feet of skin friction for either uplift or downward loading. b. Allowable Foundation Bearing Pressure below depth of 10.0 feet 3000 pounds per square foot for dead load 3500 pounds per square foot for dead plus live load 400.0 pounds per square foot for all loads including wind and . seismic (Note: Caisson foundations should be designed using skin friction or direct bearing but not both) c. Allowable lateral fluid pressure Surface to 20.0 feet below surface: 200 pounds per square foot for dead load 250 pounds per square foot -for dead plus live load 300 pounds per square foot for all loads including wind and seismic d. Lateral sliding resistance for either native soil or compacted fill: 0.35 3.4 Building Foundations Any proposed building structures may be supported on conventional reinforced concrete continuous wall and isolated column footings which bear on the native materials or on engineered fill. Footings may be designed using an allowable bearing capacity of 1500 pounds per square foot (psf) for dead loads, 1750 psf for long Geotechnical Report for Nextel Site CA -071313, Sycamore Creek/Page 4 • term live loads and 2000 psf for short term loading due to wind or seismic forces. Any building foundations should be a minimum of 12 inches wide and be at least 12 inches below finished adjacent grade. 3.5 Slabs -on -grade Concrete slabs -on -grade may be placed on at least 4 inches of drain rock or pea gravel to provide a uniform structural base; the base material may be placed directly on native soil prepared and compacted to the requirements of section 3.1 of the geotechnical report or on engineered fill prepared to the requirements of Section 3.7 below. Minimum slab reinforcing should be 6 x 6 10/10 mesh or #3 rebar at 24 inches on center. If the slab is used for a floor that will have moisture sensitive floor covering it should be underlain with an impermeable membrane that is placed over the drain rock. This vapor membrane should be covered with two inches of clean fine sand to provide membrane protection and promote uniform slab curing. 3.6 Trench Backfill Native or imported soils may be used for trench backfill; rocks greater than one inch in maximum dimension should not be used within 12 inches -of any utility line. All trench backfill should be moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture content, placed in lifts less than 8.inches in loose thickness and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density'as determined by ASTM D1557. The upper 6 inches of any areas supporting footings, concrete slabs or pavements should be compacted to 95%. 3.7 Engineered Pill The materials encountered in the boring should be suitable for engineered fill. If imported fill is used it should be free of organic material and debris, evenly graded, less than 6 -inches in maximum.. dimension and non -plastic (plasticity index less than 15, liquid limit less than 30). Any imported Fill materials should be tested. and approved by the engineer prior to use. All fill material should be moisture con ditioned.to.near. optimum moisture,, -..-- content, placed in lifts less than 8 inches in loose thickness and compacted. to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTIM D1557. The upper 6 inches of any areas supporting footings, concrete slabs or pavements should be compacted to 95%. Jetting should not be used for compaction. Geotechnical Report for Nextel Site CA -0713B, Sycamore Creek/Page 5 • 3.8 Drainage Final grading should leave 2% minimum gradients away from foundations. 3.9 Settlement Post construction settlement of either the caisson foundations for the lattice tower or the spread footings for other structures should be less than 1/4 inch. 3.10 Temporary Slopes Temporary slopes in the native soil should not exceed one -and -one half horizontal to one vertical (ie 1.5:1). 4. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION Variations in subsurface conditions are possible and may be encountered during construction. In order to permit correlation between the subsurface data obtained in our investigation and actual subsurface conditions encountered during construction and to assure conformance with the plans and specifications, a civil or geotechnical engineer should observe the foundation excavation prior to placement of concrete and reinforcing steel. We also. recommend that we review the final -design .documents in order that the recommendations be properly implemented.% S. LIMITATIONS The recommendations presented in this report are based on field observations; laboratory testing and our understanding of the project. We request that we be notified immediately if any subsurface conditions are encountered during construction that differ from those described .in this report so that we can review them and.make.any appropriate changes. Also, if the scope of.the project. or.location of the foundation changes from that -described in -this report,.we request that we be notified. Geotechnical Report for Nextel Site CA -0713B, Sycamore Creek/Page 6 NOTE: The purpose of this: map is to show. the approximate -- location of the site associated with this report only. - F O BERT YOUNG AND ASSOCIATES ,Idaho Maryland Road, Grass Valley, CA 95945 6) 477-2864 NTS CLIENT/JOB: Nextel; Site #CA -0713B ITEM: Site Location DATE: 10/6/97 PLATE: 1 OF 5 —D ma ------ ,- 4m --------------- -----xis^.-- --- ,..,.b-----� ------ t NOTE: The purpose of•this-map, is to show the approximate•- location of the exploratory boring. PROPOSED LEASE SITE NTS APPROXIMATE. LOCATION . OF EXPLORATORY BORING' BERT YOUNG AND ASSOCIATES CLIENT/JOB: Nextel: Site #CA -0713B 563 Idaho Maryland Road, Grass Valley, CA 95945 ITEM: Site Plan ;916) 477-2864 1 DATE: 10/6/97 1 PLATE: 2 OF 5 MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS GROUP TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS SYMBOLS WELL GRADED GRAVELS, w GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR GRAVEL AND CLEAN GRAVELS ,`;`;`;`;' NO FINES GRAVELLY (LITTLE OR — � :..: POORLY GRADED GRAVEL, OR SOILS NO FINES) COARSE- — GP GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR GRAINED... --' — ................ NO FINES SOILS MORE THAN 50% GRAVELS 111111111 GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND -SILT OF COARSE WITH FINES MIXTURES FRACTION RETAINED ON A zzzzz NO.4 SIEVE (APPRECIABLE GC SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND -CLAY AMOUNT OF FINES) v MIXTURES CLEAN SAND 7777'{ 77777 7 7 7 7 c 7Y.Y. S W WELL GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SAND AND y Y. _1 77777771 SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES SANDY SOILS (LITTLE ORP S GRAVELLY POORLY GRADED SANDS OR SANDS, LITTLE OR MORE THAN 50% NO FINES) f NO OF MATERIAL FINES IS LARGER THAN SANDS S` M SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND—SILT N0.SI SIEVE SIZE MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE WITH FINES MIXTURES FRACTION PASSING A S C CLAYEY SANDS. SAND—CLAY NO. 4 SIEVE (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES)444 ZZ MIXTURES INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE ML SANDS, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS OF LOW PLASTICITY FINE GRAINED SILTS AND LIQUID LIMIT CL INORGANIC SILTS OF LOW TO CLAYS LESS THAN 50 MEDIIUM PLASTICITY: GRAVELLY, SOILS SAND OR SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS fvvwOL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY APf CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY III MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SANDYOR MORE, THAN 50% SILTY SOILS, ELASTIC SILTS OF MATERIAL I IS SMALLER SILTS LIQUID LIMIT/� THAN NO. 200 AND GREATER L� C 1 INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH SIEVE SIZE CLAYS THAN 50 PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS ♦®®®� OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO ♦®®®& HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PIT I PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM �e _ROBERT YOUNG AND ASSOCIATES CLIENT/JOB: Nextel; Site #CA -0713B Idaho Maryland Road, Grass Valley, CA 95945 ITEM: Unified Soil Classification System t-:6) 477-2864 DATE: 10/6/97 PLATE: 3 Or S 30 12.8 10.0' — Brown, silty GRAVEL (GM) with cobbles moist, dense 40 7.6 15.0' — Brown, clayey SAND (SC) moist, dense 16.5 20.0' 1414 A — 1414 gPocket Penetrometer > 4.50 TSF TOTAL DEPTH= 20.5 feet No Free Water Encountered,. Z= Sample Taken -'BERT YOUNG AND ASSOCIATES CLIENT/JOB: Nextel; Site #CA -0713B -s Idaho Maryland Road, Grass Valley, CA 95945 ITEM: Log of Exploratory Boring (916) 477-2864 DATE: 10/6/97 PLATE: 4 Or 5 LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING DATE: 10/4/97 LOGGED BY: RP o DRILLING EQUIPMENT: Truck Mounted Drill Rig SITE: Site CA -0713B Svcamore Creek Site: Nextel ' a m C 3 <u a�I o a in ¢ . V al Depth I Description of materials and notes o — 32 13.4 %,,6FImported rted a re ate base Dark brown, silty CLAY (CL) 7///with gravel Pocket Penetrometer = moist hard 3.75 TSF Brown, clayey SILT (ML) 5.0' -- moist, still 21 19.7 Pocket Penetrometer = 3.75 TSF 30 12.8 10.0' — Brown, silty GRAVEL (GM) with cobbles moist, dense 40 7.6 15.0' — Brown, clayey SAND (SC) moist, dense 16.5 20.0' 1414 A — 1414 gPocket Penetrometer > 4.50 TSF TOTAL DEPTH= 20.5 feet No Free Water Encountered,. Z= Sample Taken -'BERT YOUNG AND ASSOCIATES CLIENT/JOB: Nextel; Site #CA -0713B -s Idaho Maryland Road, Grass Valley, CA 95945 ITEM: Log of Exploratory Boring (916) 477-2864 DATE: 10/6/97 PLATE: 4 Or 5 i . F: "'W'•!t.. � ter; • •` �'�:,:.'�:� .. i- . A.a„`. - _ '�.�-• �:':'•c'�'=: �•:fir»��rf,r.;`.;:;::' . _ ...:'h:C�.•.•,�{',V'�H'yz {)ate. _���''�.•Y"'gv,VS•. 5. �� „y.;.:f'�” ' • j '.c.• C: �p SI�':: �:'_ �t�7_:��_..�__.}���e� •_iii::.__.. :. {p Y�• ,4t a%�:r� l�' y'�•..ii• VKf'MeQ ,2.`�': :: is •f .�,y,� 1��..I �_ti. YC 1 ..) qA. �._�, • 1. fr�'Z3Cl�...y '`:.� . .:�1�r)t:r.t+�:+•:��yy�G��9�v�fsiisff.�'kxlyl ...4''� .e'S��I,F:-'{•"Sf���',2:- :.�••:.:::i;_..:.: P./ T T 3 Rock f ane _ 1pltoot Ib It C, wil ccL i b. 0 L- L _ ; a 0 E -----"'KEEFER Cr --I.._ '-/ H L .k R 0,4 D -0000"o q.E VLOID C.— C!. L Li L I i Tk.- C, j Cl Ped 31,11 e 0 _d Badding Oasis O'Ne G,arc aorta Road 8,00% oli,eor 3-0 'o Green Meadow Ln, 110i'a.i 0, BB Rea 99 3 L IIA Oust-/ L— Pn.atanl 0. PCI. 3CFo R—. -,o load C ICO 0 L Siaole L3- ICIPAL DO AIRrORT L °�`° G �2 xal'.1 Lane wilso. Landing Road cP ?Our Yry. Xa.th L.. coldfirc" ct. Michelle cc H,ldsuo,a %V .iri(rr I 0 AA Ston. Valley C Way MAP -df C — — ---------- I do WWI 0 AND VICIITY area Ct. 4 C .. h 0 1p_ Z A NORD HIGHWAY:11 I I NORD EAST EATON > s ROA T-. NC1d T.'. a, Ranco P.ad I 77 Bsell RoA art` c)!:- %-27 •' N 89°1036"E �V I Z (8) 7) (9) (6) / 600' (10) (4) 20----------- 405.98- ,_ 221 (I i 13J - 3.79 AC---- �' x (13) 56 !4 4.84AC r ' - _9./OAC --- 1 13.00 36/.70 PM 82-8° 970.34 463.38 N 25 a 1.2 6.AC' 107-42't.. 07- OI \ m o0� 26 v`r 463:08 3221 (wv 39-18) 96. ! 7 12 `e�'' $.y m'� a�02!6112 �rss-r�� 42 77 41 O Cl 30 g1A m� �pM 83 90 SEE o 28 360 DETAIL "A" eek 35 129 8.70 AC r311.19 2 A3 A�1 0� 39 , \J O3I.SAc 36 0 22.77AC 722, 4 .)I� \ GS 1 64 2ts 26s.r2 rns2 p61 O 0 Ac- 72 or 37 A6 .�� \2\� A 1P "� 2 � 41 a �+ �1 �� 369 Ac c, N ca Cp �� 5 45 p 19 1- if,� / 63 rN 132-27 : TMEE � ��rs6 uc Z 13 c' SEVENS �� 2 50 68 V '52 y LN 4.2s DETAIL "A" &67 6.30AC� (I =400) 3 69 -i.tsAe NAe ) OZ 58 .a7Ao h'Z DETAIL "8" � 4 (I"- 400') 6 5 PM 59-18 8 9 �� 5292.2/ ; 7 8 N 88056'2-9E k Assessors Mop. No. 06-40 , s L" h THESE PARCELS ARE FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES County of Butte, CA. N��K ONLY AND MAY NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL PARCELS lilt 0 5�ip ORp N 2 MOUNTAIN VIEW SUB NO 1. , 16 M.O.R. 12 F — / x GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLATS, FROSTING CONDITIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF THE JOB SITE PRIOR TO STARTING WORK IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER N WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RE MSB E FOR THE SAME 2. FIGURED OIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSION& 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR WORK PROCEEDING N A SAFE AND ORDERLY MAKER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFELY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. CONTRACTOR MID/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES MUST DFYEDIULLY NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY UNSAFE CONDITIONS WRING THE COURSE OF WORK 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL CNE ALL NOTICES TWD COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORONANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY. MUMpPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CORES BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WOWL. THE WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT AND THE MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE N STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES. REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. 5. THE SCOT OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL WATERNLS, EOIPMENT, LABOR AND ALL OTHER MATERIALS AND LABOR DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK/PROJECT AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. 3902 ESPLANADE CHICO, CA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY LA 0111KIll : CO -LOCATION OF ANTENNAS 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL DSTALL ALL EOUIPYENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S / VENDOR'S SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODS OR ORDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE. 7. CONTRACTOR SITAR SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RES 066 FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. & CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT DWI NG IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, PAVING, CURBNG, ETC. DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION OF NOWT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED DUE TO CONSTRICTION ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE GENERAL WORK AREA CLEW AND HAZARD FREE OURNG CONSTRUCTION AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT. OEM RUBBISH AND REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY. PROM SHALL BE LEFT IN CLEAN COMM AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS. DUST. OR SMUDGES OF ANY MATURE. 10. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED FOR 24-06- (SIZE D). DO NOT SCALE OTHER SIZED VETtSONS OF THESE DRAWINGS IGENERAL LEGEND SECTION NUMBER x x—x SHEET NUMBER DRAWING SECTION SECTION NUMBER x—x SHEET NUMBER DETAIL SECTION NUMBER X. x—x \ SHEET NUMBER J\ DETAIL ENLARGEMENT NTS = NOT TO SCALE I— — SHEET INDEX SHT N0. SHEET TITLE REV. NO. T-1 TITLE SHEET 2 Z-1 PLOT PUMA 1 Z-2 ELEVATION, SITE PUN, k DETAILS 2 LATITUDE: 39'4227' CHICO. CA 95973 LONGITUDE 121'S3'41- SITE ADDRESS: 35973 ESPLANADE DOM CA 95973 APPLICANT: UBQLMEL ELEVATION: 171.1' 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE. SLATE A LSCS MAP• N/A CHICO. CA 95973 OED BOOK PACE BOOK 16, PAGE 12 PROJECT SUMMARY SITE NUMBER SFOAU8322 PROPERTY OWNER DAVID k NELL STEPHENS SITE DATA: SITE NAME: MUD CRED( 3M ESPLANADE LATITUDE: 39'4227' CHICO. CA 95973 LONGITUDE 121'S3'41- SITE ADDRESS: 35973 ESPLANADE DOM CA 95973 APPLICANT: UBQLMEL ELEVATION: 171.1' 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE. SLATE A LSCS MAP• N/A CHICO. CA 95973 OED BOOK PACE BOOK 16, PAGE 12 PARCEL NUMBER 006-400-056 CONTACT PERSON: STEVE RUPPENDLAL (SM) 1197-5005 REFERENCE MAP. LOT NUMBER 13 PACE: N/A CURRENT ZONING. C-2 COMMERCIAL 2 JURISDICTION: BUTTE COUNTY GRID N/A PROJECT DESRIPTION INSTALLATION OF THE UBIOUITEL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACIUTY CONSISTING OF SEVEN EQUIPMENT CABINET (3 INITIAL, 4 FUTURE). ANTENNAS CONSIST OF (3) SECTORS WITH (2) INITIAL AND (1) FUTURE. PANEL ANTENNAS AT EACH SECTOR LOCATED AT AN ANTENNA CENTER OF 60' ON THE EXISTING LATTICE TOWER VICINITY MAP 9T1E TRUE NORTH DRIVING DIRECTIONS FROM: 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE, TAKE HWY 99 NORTH AND LEFT ON ESPLANADE. APPROVALS U IDLORO LEASING R.F. ZONING CONSTRUCTION AZLH: TECTONIC £N&NEEMNC CONSULTANTS P.C. 9100 Centre Points Dr. Ste. 100 West Chester, OH 45069 Phone: (513) 942-9530 For. (513) 42-9531 ;pLcc LCC INTERNATIONAL., W 1923 .MWS WLML." U mYt MEAN. VA 21102 UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE ONF'ORVATM CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO UBIOUITEL S STRICTLY PROHIBITED. arao[tr MUD—CREEK SF03UB322A .1901 C94AWDE OCC CA 95973 PROJECT No. 26LT3.SF322/A DRAWN BY: FR CHECKED BY: LHF ITT Et U12- d'109 Civ►L Z-0 CF A sm amt TITLE PAGE 9EET a mm T-1 G NOTES THE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE AT THE CENTER OF THE COSTING TOWER WAS DETERYOiED BY CPS OBSERVATIONS LAT. 3917.26.7' N. NAD 83 LONG 12153.39.30' EL NAD 83 ELEV. 174.1' NAVD 88 (BASIS OF ORAITING) LAT. 39'47.27.1' N. NAD 27 LONG 12153'35.4• W. NAD 27 ELEV. 171.8• NGVD 29 The information shoen oDove meets or ext:ea. the requirements sal forth in FAA oder 826009G for 1-A w accocy ( 3 15' horizontaly and t 3' vertically). The horizontal datum (coardnates) ore expressed as deVem, minutes and seconds, to the neared tenth of o second. The vertical datum (heights) or* elPrassed in fest and dacirmals thereof and oe detemined to the nearest 0.1 foot. GROUND ELEV. - 174.1' A.M.S.L. (NAVD 88) TOP OF STRUCTURE ELEV. - 257.8 ALLS.L. (NAVO 88) STRUCTURE HEIGHT - 101.7' GRAPHIC SCALE ( p=T) 1 laxh - le h. (rDR w s 3r pum 011571 W � RANOq sr LN ms�501 uxssEc es $ "Tw LM SITE W VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE A I LOT 13 OF MOUNTAIN VIEW SUB, I SEC 5, T 22 N, R 1 E, M.O.M. i APN: 006-400-056 x LFGFNQ iMiROlgMa WATER — ---T-- OOERIROLMD TEIFAOIE — �— — --C— — UCER010W10 ELECTRCAL — --9- — --*- — UNDERGROUND GAS — — — — — — — SITE BasOW, UE poormte PROFATv LLE o POIWR POE (PP.) O ROOD 4107 FIRE NTOIANT oq WATER VALVE ® ELECTRIC "ERR WATER LETDe DEVATM AT TON OF CONOETE �T EIEVATOP AT FLORpIE ELEVATION AT EDGE OF PAVOE7IT ELEVATION AT NATLGIAL OtpllO ,r �Fy CENTUILI E OF STREET 0 COSTSIC Ir pew —x COODE11C LOCATION MEN NERE wu 91E PINI BATED 01 SiREEv BT AtwAllm OE9ON COfSIArANT, uc DAIm e/T4/on 20' x 10' ECLONDAT 9ELTER peTmNG CABLE TRAT _oma urncE TO4R GI AVEL SLOWACE SITE PLAN TECTONIC ENG/NEERTNG CONSULTANTS P.C. 9100 Centre Pointe Dr. Ste. 100 West Chester. OH 45069 Phone: (513 942-9530 Fox: (513) 42-9531 ZOLCC LAC I NTER NATMAL. INC 7925 ATS =.A DRIVE YdEAN. T. 22102 UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THS SET OF DOCUMENTS 6 NARY BY NATURE ANY USE OR D6CLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT M41CH RELATES TO USOL11TEL 6 STRICTLY PROHMITED. F%w MUD CREEK SF03UB322A ZM F9iiAW DIM CA 95973 PROJECT NO: 26(aSF322A (IRAVN BY: BJA CHECKED BY: LHF TTA aB/Z9/OO IEV6ED TOM MEDT oa MUED FOR ZOWIO R r)2274 >� EXP, /2-3/-02: PLOT PLAN 41C P,/w etl[D O, SLOXY Of MIwwCE DESIGN LS611LTMR. LLL OLtm 9/14/00, MD iE3D IEAb IRCIAMIS Of TECIO< EECrnEIIe,IC LT eTmO TELCO WlIT� `L' zz SITE PLAN UXT ®e,/WM TO tocoortia ami LThU1s La3ipa• In .D nmwx ANSyr 1/4 /IeO01L ', CQ%, IL CABLE LOP DETAIL R I a E or PcoosEc ELEVATION _-' SCALE. Nrs e TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS P.C. 9100 Centre Pointe Dr. Ste. 100 West Chester. ON 45069 Pham: (513) 942-9530 Fo>; (513) 442-9531 t�o LCC LCC OITE U"nCIIIAL, DIC 7925 .o s BRANCH DIM !mmaon. J.% mm UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS 5 PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THMI THAT WHICH RELATES TO UBIOUREL 6 STRICTLY PROHIBRED. PIBEEr MUD CREEK SF03UB322A Sm LSPumm 090O, CA 93973 PROJECT ND 2683SF322A DRAVN BY: FR [NECKED BY: LHF oT/m/DD .>® tps. a rmn a De/te/De RLrrsm EON. ! TOEpt OV231001 ISSLIED FM :MMIC r„ PiE --� C O o o ROD! 4 �I R 7nvm LANDSCAPE or -d ac "I f t - � --' � ---; --- s/4• CRIBED 510,E 1`40= ON ED^ 0 o e ,ewautr atm xNma�P � ' . I I I I ►---t---t---r--_-� ASrY 017 S>ff ua s7 I I R 0s , n, �, , Fa -1 i CABINET EX ./ Z-3/• D 2 1/419 VMS WT o I�ET,�Tl __- �ABPET L,____J `I C�V1� 0 0 0 ammA cam b . STEEL CA9,E�N,cot •Lr LJ• �// '� ere a• r\ 5.\ +�' , \ �. �\ n QCOAXIAL CABLE SUPPORT �rwSullo E JESLIETa�� :-� s"'E "5�EQUIPMENT PAD PLAN GRAVEL SURFACING DETAIL LETa[Ls ICE BRIDGE DETAIL i'' s :°_: s¢r�seot __, ua,c Nrs NIS Z-2 3902 ESPLANADE CHOCO, CA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY H SF03UB;3h'22A CO -LOCATION OF ANTENNAS GENERAL NOTES I. CONTRACTOR SMALL VERIFY ALL PUNS. EXISTING C ommNS. AND fi CONTRACTOR SWILL INSTALL All EOUIPYENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING D0EN50l6 OF THE JOB SITE PRIOR TO STAMM WOR( IMMEDIATELY TO THE YANUFACTUREWS / VELHOOR•S SPECFICWTIOIS UNLESS NOTED NOTIFY THE ENOHEER N WRIIINO OF ANY 06CRDW$CIES BEFORE OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PROCEEDW WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME PRECEDENCE 2. FIGURED ONE?S06 TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIVERSON& 3. CONDUCTOR SWILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR WORK PROCEEDING N A SAFE AND ORDERLY MANNER N ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES AND REOUNEYDIIS OF THE OCCUPATgNAI SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. CONTRACTOR AND/OR THEN EMPLOYEES 1M6T IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY UNSAFE CONDITIONS OURM THE COURSE OF WORM 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL CNE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS. ORDINANCES. RULES. REG LATIIIS Atm LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUCK AUTNO M MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. AND LOCAL AND STATE d)RIS01CTIONAI CODES BEAVE ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORM. THE WORM PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT AND THE MATERIALS PWALIFD SWILL BE N STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS AND ORDNANCE. 5. THE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE FlURNSIMHG ALL MATERIALS. EOUIPMENT, LABOR AND ALL OTHER MATER &ALS AND LABOR DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORII(/PROJECT AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PRQECT DESCRIBED HEREN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS. METHODS. TEONgUES, SEOIE NCES AND PROCEOCIRES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK. UNDER THE CONTRACT. a CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT DaSTNG IMPROVEMDOS, EASEMENTS. PAVING, GURBIA • ETC. DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY FUME OCCURRED DILE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE GENERAL WORSE AREA CLEAN APO HAZARD FREE MILLING CONSTRUCTION AND DISPOSE OF ALL OAT, DEBRIS, RUBBISH AND RQFOVE EOIAPMENT NOT SPEOED AS REMAIMVG ON THE MUM. PREMISES SWILL BE LETT IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PANT SPOTS, OUST. OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. 10. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED FOR 24x36' (SIZE D). DO NOT SCALE OTHER SIZED VOW6 OF THESE DRAWNCS_ GENERAL LEGEND' SECTION NUMBER n . x x -x SHEET NUMBER DRAWING SECTION 4SECTION NUMBER x x-: f SHEET NUMBER DETAIL } SECTION NUMBER x x -x SHEET NUMBER, DETAIL ENLARGEMENT NTS = NOT TO SCALE 1 RECEIVED J(IN 0 I� EIV SHEET INDEX SHT NO. SHEET TITLE NO. T-1 TITLE SHEET 2 PNOPERIY OWNER: DWVID R NEUL STEPFENS 2-1 PLOT PUN 1 2-2 ELEVATION. STE PLAN, It DETAILS 2 MEW LATITUDE- 3T4r2r t 25973 LONTi1IbE 1215341 SITE ADDRESS 35973 ESPIANAOE CHC(, CA 95973 APPLICANT: IBIOUREL EUFVATION: 171.1• 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE, SUITE A ISGS MAP. N/A CHICO. CA 95973 DEED BOOK PAGE: BOOK 16. PACE 12 PROJECT SUMMARY SITE NUMBER sraTtlm PNOPERIY OWNER: DWVID R NEUL STEPFENS SITE DATA: SITE NAME Alb CREEK MEW LATITUDE- 3T4r2r t 25973 LONTi1IbE 1215341 SITE ADDRESS 35973 ESPIANAOE CHC(, CA 95973 APPLICANT: IBIOUREL EUFVATION: 171.1• 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE, SUITE A ISGS MAP. N/A CHICO. CA 95973 DEED BOOK PAGE: BOOK 16. PACE 12 PARCEL. NUMBER 006-400-056 COBALT PERSON: SIEVE RUPPENOHAL (530) 107-5005 REFERENCE MAP. LOT NUMBER 13 PAGE N/A CURRENT ZONNQ C-2 COMMERCIAL 2 AIR601CTIOt BUTTE COUNTY GNKk N/A + n PROJECT DESRIPTION INSTALLATION OF THE UBIOUITEL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY CONSISTING OF SEVEN EQUIPMENT CABINET (3 INITIAL, 4 FUTURE). ANTENNAS CONSIST OF (3) SECTORS WITH (2) INITIAL AND (1) FUTURE. PANEL ANTENNAS AT EACH SECTOR LOCATED AT AN ANTENNA CENTER OF 60' ON THE EXISTING LATTICE TOWER JUL 17 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION VICINITY MAP x TRUE NORTH FROM: 140INDEPENDENCE DNRECT�IONS E HWY 99 NORTH AND LEFT ON ESPLANADE. APPROVALS LANOLORID IFASNG RF. ZOmFG CONSii3UCT10N . ARE TECTONIC NX,Cff4 CCNWWArAA,7S P.c 9100 Centre Pointe Or. Ste. 100 Meal Chmter, ON 45069 Pimp (513) 942-9530 Fs (513) 442-9531 %I# LCC IPP minvY—'— 7925 "JES BRANCH ORME YcLEAN, VA 22102 UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE I FORIWION CONTAINED N THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS 6 PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHGH RELATES TO U SIOUTTEL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. MIMI MUD—CREEK SF03UB322A AM E gNAMA X ORR G W973 PROACT NO: 26937322A DRAWN BY: FR CHECKED BY. Lw SUBMITTALS *xYZ-,122. clvl� Of CAN 9[0 WILL TITLE PAGE sw RAM T-1 r.Qv I` NOTES THE LATITUDE AND LONOTUDE AT THE CENTER OF THE DMMG TOtttEit WAS OETERYaVEO BY CPS OBSERVATIONS LAT. 39'47'26.7 N. HAD 83 LONG 1215}'39.30' l HAD 83 ELEV. 174.1' NAVD 88 (OASIS OF CRAVING) LAT. 39'4x27.1' N. HAD 27 LONG 121SY35.4' W. HAD 27 ELEV. 171-8' NGVO 29 The ilfonnotiion sh~ oboe reefs or tttee I the reOVirelTents set forth in FAA order 8260.19c for 1-A omxocr (S 15' hcriE tcfly and t 3' .ert'cdlT). The hmiza td dotwn (coerdncta) one expressed as degas, R*Wtn end suds. to the neorest teeth of o second The wt¢d dot -n (heights) ore mwessd i1 tat and decinols Uroaot and We doternihed to the necrest Qt fool GROUND ELEV. - 174.1' ALLSL (NAW 88) TOP OF STRUCTURE ELEV. - 257.8 AN.S.L (NAVE 88) STRUCTURE HEIGHT - lot.r GRAPHIC SCALE Me T d Bear ) 1 tReh - 10 rL (fon 1w ■ 3r pw" VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE LOT 13 OF MOUNTAIN VIEW SUB, SEC 5, T 22 N. R 1 E. M.D.M. APN: 006-400-056 cmsuc Tr DROP 9TE rLAN tY7[D a LReEr tt. AOYARG[ aESO1 HamATANr, to wTm e/1•/on TECTONIC ENGNEERTNC CONSULTANTS P.C. 9100 Centra Pante Dr. Ste. 100 Melt Chester. OH 45069 Phone(51} 942-9530 For. (513) 2-9531 t�o LCC w=Tklml. 1Nf DNANON OtavE YcLEAK VA 22102 Ubiqui rel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A C CICO, CA 95973 THE D FORYAIION CONTADIED N THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS 6 PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT ■HCH RELATES TO USIOIATEL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. "mu MUD CREEK SF03UB322A JIM ESSi MVE ONO. G25973 PRD.IECT N0 2683.SF32ZA DRAWN BY. BJA CHECKED BY. LIQ SUBMITTALS 1 O x a/as/oo REh6ED tGehm WOR : rot Zmewc x x 20' i 10' EOOrhEN1 SHELTER LEGE D V -E-- - NEROIO{/O WEER I - — — — 1NaER�a GAG 7052279 t:Am H TZ:JhT01 - -- - --- SrtE 11tAeoARr LSE � � owt tERE �twrt¢ TpER Exp. /2-j/-Oz- PItOVEA1. NAE � ULA/ o FORM OW rate fir.) 0 o tEcao tTtalr , TIRE MDURT x Q c ® eLNrme NETER • Re'"METER TOM VAMT MO ElF0h101 AT TOP or CteKIETE EIE"TION AT RDt/E ElfTeht101 A7 FOLi VI rAil41T - x�%max `epi PLOT PLAN ,,�qp,, ElElwTt AT Iut1RAL t70IlD tiGhQ 9AfACE p �S CENTO011E OF STEM HEFT NNp SITE PLAN Z-1 _1 ) SITE PLAN 011+10 ON swat? mm AwICE OESIM ciy! C016LLL "Im. Umm 9/14/00, AMC FEW YFIBgF11cm Or T¢TOW OICIQJaIIC o�T.c 1p0o 1.a1LT 2 I/T I I QCOAXIAL CABLE SUPPORT _-= Sma am =-7 I zz SITE PLAN sa x- BOLT mo1/e50= To L]J IOiRONTAL L.1S[I/..4Y-e- IL sew RiYC n r l In e I I nw-m ISEE DEM I tal+rlp IL-2 I IWAAN HOLES I COQML I 1�1 110 L__J 2b WE ! 8 1 I e�. ICE BRIDGE DETAIL �SNL IRS E or PROPO a /—s -*N EQUIPMENT PAD PLAN :-= sate Ins 3/41 AST = ELEVATION _ 8 WEED apAmm I apim- axm%=mamax -/ GRAVEL SURFACING DETAIL TECTONIC ENCINCENTA/C COATSUGrANTS P.S 9100 Centre Points Dr. Ste. 100 Went Chester, OH 45069 Phone: (513) 942-9530 Fox (513) 2-9531 LCC ICC N7ERHATIO Q- me ram "*5 mmul umw YcIEAH. VA 72102 Ubiqui-Tel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE NFORMATKIN CONTwn N 1}16 SET OF DOCUMEWS 6 PROPRIETAR1i or NATLW- ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT M410 f RELATES TO UBKIIATEL 6 STRICTLY PROHNIED. moan MUD CREEK SF03UB322A 399= C91AWSE of= CA 95973 PROJECT ND 26E13SF322A DRAW BT- FR CHECKED BY- LW I SUBMITTALS ;0;7 / o m® ms. a .mm a /a+/m am= caw. a Mm IW ov2voo on" Fm zol m I SITE PLAN I L IETAILS ml mine Z-2 � NC r M OFLECr �6701 am e/ .OII a 00310 a►oaas opm u smw cmu sfsOlI 0 o WOMM tT 61110 M / u S -WT 10'41.3 1a HEAD CAP BOND . a TIC. sof. NUT mala CWE 4 ANOWN su¢ cac a.Im1T 2 I/T I I QCOAXIAL CABLE SUPPORT _-= Sma am =-7 I zz SITE PLAN sa x- BOLT mo1/e50= To L]J IOiRONTAL L.1S[I/..4Y-e- IL sew RiYC n r l In e I I nw-m ISEE DEM I tal+rlp IL-2 I IWAAN HOLES I COQML I 1�1 110 L__J 2b WE ! 8 1 I e�. ICE BRIDGE DETAIL �SNL IRS E or PROPO a /—s -*N EQUIPMENT PAD PLAN :-= sate Ins 3/41 AST = ELEVATION _ 8 WEED apAmm I apim- axm%=mamax -/ GRAVEL SURFACING DETAIL TECTONIC ENCINCENTA/C COATSUGrANTS P.S 9100 Centre Points Dr. Ste. 100 Went Chester, OH 45069 Phone: (513) 942-9530 Fox (513) 2-9531 LCC ICC N7ERHATIO Q- me ram "*5 mmul umw YcIEAH. VA 72102 Ubiqui-Tel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE NFORMATKIN CONTwn N 1}16 SET OF DOCUMEWS 6 PROPRIETAR1i or NATLW- ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT M410 f RELATES TO UBKIIATEL 6 STRICTLY PROHNIED. moan MUD CREEK SF03UB322A 399= C91AWSE of= CA 95973 PROJECT ND 26E13SF322A DRAW BT- FR CHECKED BY- LW I SUBMITTALS ;0;7 / o m® ms. a .mm a /a+/m am= caw. a Mm IW ov2voo on" Fm zol m I SITE PLAN I L IETAILS ml mine Z-2