Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMUP 08-0002Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile www.buttecounty.net/dds www.buttegeneralplan.net ADMINISTRATION "BUILDING " PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: Diane Lewellen — Development Services FROM: Mark Michelena SUBJECT: MUP08-0002 — Osborne — Application Withdrawn DATE: January 19, 2010 This project has been withdrawn. Please see attached email. Please begin refund process on the Fish and Game Fee, NOD Recorder's Fee and publishing fee. I have put in all my time as of this memo. This project came in on December 10, 2008. Thank you. dsb o,'r�Q + A sso C �c� I W'06--�N 1 . - .. Page 1 of 3,'.:::` ... Michelena; Mark From: jason_osborne@sbcglobal.net Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 8:16 AM To: Michelena, Mark; Frank Schabarum Cc: Thistlethwaite, Charles; DeBrunner, Deborah; Lewellen, Diane Subject: Re: AT&T - MUP08-0002 - CN00110? Confirmed. Thank you, Jason Osborne, Principal Osborne & Associates 415=559-2121 mobile 415-358-5766 fax Osborne & Associates 765 Baywood Drive, Suite 325 Petaluma, Ca 94954 From: "Michelena, Mark" <MMichelena@buttecounty.net> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:56:40 -0800 To: Frank Schabarum<frank.schabarum@sbcglobal.net>; Jason Osborne<jason_osbome@sbcglobal.net> Cc: Thistlethwaite, Charles<CThistlethwaite@buttecounty.net>; DeBrunner, Deborah<DDeBrunner@buttecounty.net>; Lewellen, Diane<DLewellen@buttecounty.net> Subject: RE: AT&T - MUP08-0002 - CN00110? Frank and Jason, I will take your email as a request for MUP08-0002 to be withdrawn. I will begin the process to close out the project file. Thank you. Sincerely, Mark Michelena Senior Planner, Planning Division Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7376 (530) 538-2140 Fax mmichelenaO.buttecountv.net "COUNTY OF BUTTE E-MAIL DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this e-mail (or any attachments thereto) by other than the County of Butte or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto." From: Frank Schabarum [mailto:frank.schabarum@sbcglobal.net) Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010.10:12 AM. To: Jason Osborne; Michelena, Mark Subject: AT&T - MUP08-0002 - CN00110? 1/19/2010 Page 2•of Jason and Mark, As much as I tried, I could not get AT&T RF engineering to agree to a collocation on The Tower Company Tower which is the subject site for MUP08-0002. RF ended up approving a candidate site on Esplanade south of this location. Frank Schabarum Wireless Site Development Specialist 10615 Quail Hollow Lane Redding, CA 96003 Office Phone: S30-722-0743 Mobile Phone: 619-743-0309 frankschabarum@sbcglobal.net --- On Sun, 1/17/10, Jason Osborne <jason osborne@sbcglobaLnet> wrote: From: Jason Osborne <jason_osborne@sbcglobal.net> Subject: FW: MUP08-0002 - CN00110? To: "'Frank Schabarum"' <frank.schabarum@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sunday, January 17, 2010, 9:46 AM Frank, did you ever pursue this site in Chico (Butte jurisdiction)? Thank you, Jason Osborne, Principal Osborne & Associates 415-559-2121 mobile 415-358-5766 fax From: Michelena, Mark[mailt6:MMichelena@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:14 AM To: jason_osborne@sbcglobal.net Subject: MUP08-0002 Importance: High Jason, I just you a phone message and thought it might be prudent to also email you. I was going through my project files and noticed that this Minor Use Permit has sat incomplete (see attached letter) for over a year now. It was incomplete due to no site plan submitted with the application. If you are still interested, in pursuing this project, please provide me with a site plan (see attached example). The site plan needs to show all existing and proposed improvements. The application packet did include detail plans about the antennas and ground equipment. I would very much like to move this project forward to the Planning Commission. If you are still interested in moving forward with the project, please provide a site plan. If you are.no longer interested, please email me a. request to withdraw the application. Thank you very much. 1/19/2010 Page. 3 'of Sincerely, Mark Michelena Senior Planner, Planning Division Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7376 (530) 538-2140 Fax mmichelena(a-)buttecountv.net `COUNTY OF BUTTE E-MAIL DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this e-mail (or any attachments thereto) by other than the County of Butte or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto." 1/19/2010 Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile 0 M�9'�B-0002 CV.0 ! 16 APPLICATION PACKET FO11USE PERMIT OR MINOR USE PERMIT Applicant NamKJ2� n -...Project Number: Check One BUTTE COUNTY ❑ USE PERMIT DEC 10 2008 ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST The applicant should discuss the application requirements with Department of Development Services, Public Works and Environmental Health staff prior to preparing this application. Please note that acceptance of your application is not an indication of approval. Application packets with missing components cannot be accepted. Include this checklist along with your submittal. Applicant Planner 1. ❑ ❑ Complete a Pre -Application Review with the Environmental Health Division and provide evidence of meeting their requirements for sewage disposal and water supply in one of the following ways: ❑ A pre -application completion letter from Environmental Health ❑ A Willing and Able to Serve Letter from the appropriate utility district ❑ A completed cooperative agreement for annexation into a utility district 2. J ❑ A completed- signed Project Information Form. ; 3. 4_- J ❑ A complete Project Setting Description (instructions attached). 4. ❑ ❑ If the application is signed by an agent for the owner, an agent authorization form must be submitted along with the application. The application cannot be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. 5. ❑ ❑ A signed agreement for Butte County Archaeological Resources Project Review by the Northeast Information Center (NEIC) accompanied by its required topographic map and a check in the amount of $75.00 made out to "NEIL". 1 DE SER�CESi�T Applicant Planner 6. ❑ ❑ Payment ofthe currently required Application Fees and/or Deposits. Make checks payable to "Butte County Treasurer". Public Fee Schedule is available under "Fees" at: A/14 7. ® ❑ http://www.buttecounty.net/dds/Planning/ Additional fees for publication notices will be required prior to issuance of the use permit. Application fees are non-refundable. Applicant's Initials A creation document for the project parcel and evidence of current property ownership: I. ❑ SITE PLAN: Thirty (30) copies of a site map drawn to standard engineering scale (e.g., 1" = 20'). Additional copies of the map shall be made available to county departments upon request. All maps shall be drawn on uniform size sheets no less than 11"x17" and no rgeater than 24" X 36", folded to 8 t/Z" x 11". In addition, a digital copy of the map and aerial photographs are encouraged. The detailed map must include: a. ® ❑ Name and business address of the applicant, engineer or person who prepared the Mg. b. ® ❑ Assessor Parcel Number(s); street address (if available); tract name and date (if alipp cable); and/or Township, Range and Section numbers. c• ❑ Proposed use and/or uses of the property. d. ® ❑ A vicinity map indicating the location of the land in relation to the nearest major roads and/or significant topographic features in the surrounding area or region. e• ® ❑ Property lines, lot dimensions and any applicable easements of record or proposed. f. ❑ Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed public and private improvements on the property (including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, roads, parking areas, wells, septic tanks, sewer lines, leach fields, utilities, signage, storm drainage systems and lighting. g. ❑ ❑ Location of all water features including, but not limited to, natural and human -made drainage courses, irrigation canals, ponds, creeks, sloughs; topographic features including, but not limited to, buttes, slopes > 30%, rock out-croppings; and existing vegetation, such as oak trees greater than 5" in diameter and agricultural crops. h. ® ❑ Distances between any significant natural and constructed features of the property, such as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major tree stands, storm drains, bodies of water, railroads, and their relationship to the property lines. i• ❑ Location, height, and materials of walls and fences (sections may be required). j- © ❑ Internal circulation pattern, if applicable. k• ® ❑ Existing fire hydrants within 1000 feet. 1. ® ❑ Approximate location of all buildings, wells, septic tanks and leach fields within 100 feet, on adjacent properties. m• El ❑ All driveways, drawn to scale, on properties within 100 feet of the site. n. W ❑ Existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks and road surface widths on-site or on properties within 100 feet of the site. °• ❑ Any existing faults or fractures and geologic hazards. P- ❑ Elevation contours, at an appropriate vertical scale. q• ® ❑ Indicate at least one route from the property to a publicly -maintained road. r. ® ❑ Off-street parking pursuant to county code. S- ❑ Indicate scale and include a north arrow oriented to the top of the sheet. t• ❑ All maps must be clear and legible. mss,.. ' k Applicant Planner DEC 10 2008 9. © ❑ Building Elevations NA4 DEVELOPMENT . � SERVICES 10. If applicable, provide a proposed landscaping and irrigation plan on a separate sheet. W d J 11. ❑ ❑ If applicable, provide a conceptual grading plan. Items to be shown on the plan include: a. ❑ ❑ Natural areas to be preserved. b. ❑ ❑ Proposed cut and fill areas in contrasting colors or patterns. c. ❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contours at an appropriate vertical scale within the project and on adjacent properties within 100 feet of the project boundaries. d. ❑ Ell Proposed drainage and flood control facilities. e. ❑ ❑ Erosion control measures and best management practices (e.g., - slope landscaping). f. ❑ ❑ Natural drainage. g. ❑ ❑ Location of retaining walls, drainage channels and existing structures. h. ❑ ❑ Location, elevation and size of proposed building pads. Additional information may be required in order to clarify, correct or supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. Additional fees may be collected -for the California Department of Fish and Game at the time of recording the Notice of Determination as required by Public Resource Code (PRC) section 21089 (b). Please call the Planning Division of the Department of Development Services at (530) 538- 7601 if you have any questions about these requirements. 3 i Signature: Signature: Revised 07/26/06 E Date: 101 IID' oa Date: 'r` BUTTE COUNTY DEC 10 2008 DEVELOPMENT SEBVTCES Butte County Department4of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538 7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile APPLICATION Nl 4�.rDA- C2061,2 - MMUNICATIONS FACILITY INSTALLA Applicant Name: � )Qeoy) �rn� Project Number: Nglpdg a dU Note: This checklist must be accompanied by a Use Permit or Minor Use Permit Application (per Butte County Code Section 24-262.E). APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST The applicant should discuss the application requirements with Department of Development Services, Public Works and Environmental Health staff prior to submitting an application. Please note that acceptance of your application is not an indication of approval. Application packets with missing components cannot be accepted. Include this checklist along with your submittal. BUTTE COUNTY Applicant Planner DEC 10 2008 El 1. ❑ Statement of Justification. Must include the following: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES a. � ❑ A description of the proposed facility, including the type being requested. b. � ❑ Height from natural grade to the top of proposed Facility. c. ❑ Support equipment proposed. otrdiv o d. ❑ RFR/EMF and wattage output data including the number of channels. vl e. Horizontal and vertical location coordinates. 2. ® ❑ Proposed elevations of the structure and any accessory, buildings, including building height and other physical dimensions, drawn to graphic scale. 3. ❑ Visual impact assessment, photo montages, mock-ups as determined by the Director of Development Services or Planning Commission. The assessment shall identify any proposed trimming of vegetation that will be required for the normal operation of the Facility. Stealth technology is encouraged. • • 4.`01 EIMock-upsrequired (may be required at any time during the processing of the permit). V 1 5. ❑ A discussion of and supporting information regarding the alternative site selection of at least a minimum of three to four other sites, if available, including colocation opportunities, and a statement as to why these alternative sites and/or colocation opportunities were rejected. 6.8 ❑ A complete service area map showing the provider's entire wireless communications network twenty (20) miles in all directions from the proposed site for the time period from the filing of the application to twelve (12) months from the filing of the application, for the purpose of visually aiding cumulative environmental analysis, with and without the proposed facility or facilities, showing all hand-off sites within the above specified area. 7. `MI q ❑ A graphic depiction of the search ring and all other technical criteria used in determining the proposed facility location. 101 8. ❑ ❑ Documentation which identifies failure characteristics of the facility structure or tower and demonstrates that the site and setbacks are of adequate size to contain falling debris. 9. ❑ ❑ At the time of application for new wireless facilities use permit, the applicant should consider any future needs for installation of backup emergency power (diesel generator) systems. Related to such installations, applicant must provide the following information: a. ❑ ❑ Operating specifications of the diesel generator, including horsepower rating and noise output rating. b. El ❑ Provide specifications for noise attenuation/acoustical shielding structures/enclosures for the diesel engine. c. [I ❑ Fuel tank and/or batteries specifications: Location (including above or below ground) of all emergency power backup installations must be clearly specified on the site plan. d. ❑ ❑ State number, specifications, and location of all battery backup systems. e. ❑ ❑ Provide proposed hours of periodic testing of emergency power systems. f. ❑ ❑ The applicant acknowledges that s/he will need to submit an application to Butte County Environmental Health Division for approval of a Hazardous Materials Release Response Plan by a separate Request for Service Environmental Health Division application and accompanying fee for each project that includes an emergency backup power system. BUTTE COUNTY DEC 10 2008 (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 10.0 ❑ Written evidence demonstrating that the selected facility structure or tower design is as visually unobtrusive as possible, given technical and engineering considerations. This evidence shall indicate which type of facility is required to provide reasonably effective service and also the best technology and/or construction available to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness. The use of best available technology and/or construction to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness is mandatory. 11. ❑ ❑ Annlicants who overate common carrier facilities (snecifically. but not limited to cellular, PCS, SMR and paging service licensees of the FCC) shall provide written evidence that the applicant has provided notice to all FCC licensed wireless communication service carriers operating within the County of Butte of the plans to develop the site. 12. ❑ ❑ Evidence of a valid, current operating license or construction permit from the FCC or, if the applicant is not a wireless communications service provider, a user operating agreement for each and every such provider to which the applicant intends to rent space on the proposed facility. 13. ❑ ❑ A report, signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer licensed by the FCC, prepared pursuant to FCC OET 65, stating whether the maximum radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic radiation (RF/EMF) to be emitted by the proposed facility, taking into account all other facilities, both existing and known future facilities, at the proposed site and adjacent properties, conforms to safety standards adopted by the FCC, if applicable. The reports prepared for facilities shall conform to the reporting requirements set by the County and FCC OET 65 human exposure standards. The report shall also analyze the evidence provided in support of the proposed facility location, height and radiated power, frequency, the number of channels, and all other related data and present alternatives for the location, height and radiated power, pursuant to the requirements of this section. If the proposed facility exceeds FCC OET 65 human exposure standards, applicant shall also provide additional comprehensive technical and planning information regarding how the applicant shall protect all persons from such excessive exposure consistent with all Federal and State requirements, and any additional County requirements. 14. 1)0 ❑ Landscaping and painting plans for the completed project. 15. ❑ ❑ Projects in Agricultural Zones (A-5 through A-160) shall, prior to submitting an application for a proposed facility, submit a site plan of the proposed facility to the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner for comment and send a notification letter to all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County informing them of the proposed site location and tower height. No hearing on an application for a proposed facility in any agricultural zone will be scheduled, nor shall any Administrative Permit for any such facility be issued without proof that the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner BUTTE COUNTY DEC 10 2008 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES and all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County have been notified, as specified herein. 16. ❑ ❑ All applications for facilities that are proposed to be located within the boundaries of any. Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan or Airport Area of Influence, as adopted or designated from time to time by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission, shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division, and a copy C� submitted to the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission for review regarding Zp4 consistency with adopted Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plans and for recommendations addressing potential impacts to air navigation within the Airport Area of Influence. The County may in its sole discretion retain an independent consultant to review either individual elements of or the entire application and advise the County at the applicant's sole expense. After approval and prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall post a performance security to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the county, sufficient to determine whether the facility's MEW emissions comply with FCC standards. In addition, the applicant shall post a separate performance security to cover the cost of removal of the facility in the event that such facility is abandoned, or the permit has been terminated for violation of its conditions by the county after hearing, or has expired, or after notice has been given to the owner/operator by the county, no application for renewal has been filed. Additional information may be required in order to clarify, correct or supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. Please call the Planning Division of the Department of Development Services at (530) 538-7601 if you have any questions about these requirements. Signature: Signature: Date p" to ' 6Q Date: iZ—`V —a a BUTTE COUNTY K:\Planning\FORMS\APPLICATIONS\Communications Facilities.doc Revised 08/04/06 DEC 10 20018 DESERVICES NS /VWfl p Z—v 5 utte County Department aDevelopment Services �UTTF TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE %ARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR o 4!� ���////ii OO ttssvv 1t �� 7 County Center Drive o o Oroville, CA 95965 COUNTY �,5 .-. ; (530) 538-7601 Telephone ? 0- 2008s ��-- o DEC o I V" �, (530) 538-7785 Facsimile ,(/ . -.- . >-- --; , .. -..�.: �� C — •i DEVELOPMENT • SEE, Y1.a. PROJECT INFORMATION Project # APPLICANT'S. AME: -,(If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required.) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: -ADDRESS: STREET, C' Y, TA , & ZIP CODE a uY1na I-,5- TELEPHONE: E-MAIL: ✓l_ FAX: (ql5 R'S NAME:TELEPHONE: 000025 W cit 7 - abD . ADDRESS: STREET`ITY, S . TE, & ZIP COD 2 630 IMAG 2 s AW , S -le 136, gq4W We , G�t7 c[5(0� � PROPERTY INFORMATION NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (if any) SITE SIZE (in square feet or acres) SQ n 5(D FT LOCATION OF PROJECT (major cr ss streets and address, if ) 1 l( (fid Ch�CO, C q 3 x -s �eecT �raAl eb ZONE GENERAL PLAN' EXISTING LAND USE PROPOSED LAND USE Fel nl ca � �n'►C EXISTING STRUCTURES (square feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES( square feet) i�W UNDER WILLIAMSON ACT CONTRACT /,90 Ff 3el F (SUDW 1 0f, ❑ Yes ❑ No (Check One) (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ❑ PROPERTY 1S OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY 1S OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION TYPE ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP RUSE PERMIT ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT ❑ CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION ❑ COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY UP/MUP ❑ REZONE ❑ VARIANCE ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ MINOR VARIANCE ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and size of parcels.) Plea LIs 01 h ' OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization an0 in affidavit with this application.) `;'/I OES � CjkA� SIGNATUR& DATE: ` T-� PCs s COM a,Goched - BUTTE COUNTY AGENT AUTHORIZATION DEC 10 2008 �— To Butte County ELep ejA r x of Development Services: �; son a5borne Print Name of Agent Phone Number -101 6+-" S+Pcd , �ei-a ( uwu Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application on my/our property, identified as Butte County Assessors Parcel Number(s i b61-P- 601 - space, #8 This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document (s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record (sign and print name) c-k nhtr► P. Thomgt> J 746c*-) arbor v) c, PriniN&ne Print Name Signature Signature Print Name Print Name Signature Sign e Print Name of Applicant (if other than owner) S at a of Applicant (if other than owner) -AK fjq1 n(trl ✓W - #anl - I-1&Q W-h aVc) 1#71 67I-W3a Print Name f California Civil Engineer/Land Surveyor Phone Number Sum , 60) M 7 � I IYIa►1 Mailing Address Email Address MGlf09 -000Z BUTTE COUNTY DEC 10 2008 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Project Description Nature of Request _MT AT&T VVi>r4ess Services 443o Rosewood Dr, Bldg 3 Pleasanton, CA 945$$ AT&T Wireless Services seeks a Conditional Use Permit to maintain our facility with the addition of 6) Microwave antennas with its requisite cabling, to facilitate the telco (Telephone c� Service). 4 GV Property Description Qa 390 ,S The subject property is located at 3415 Silverbell Road, Chico, CA. APN# 007-001. The proposal is within the jurisdiction of Butte County. Proiect Description The (e) facility is a (120') one -hundred and twenty foot self support tower, which currently operates as a cellular facility owned by SP Thomas Company of N. Cal, Inc, who has provided authorization to proceed with securing entitlements. We are currently proposing to add (6) 4'-4" panel antennas at 90' feet and installing (3) indoor equipment cabinets inside an existing ground floor equipment room. (Please see page Z-4). The coaxial cable will be housed within (e) conduit. to mitigate any potential visual impact. The purpose of these panels will be to support the telephone services utilized for our cellular facility. In layman terms, each and every cellular facility needs power and telephone to operate, as your signal from your cell phone reaches the antennas, the signal is sent electronically to our equipment which utilizes a "telephone" line similar to an office building. However, remote locations such as a cellular facility have reliability issues with more frequency, and the cost can be very high depending on usage. To mitigate the constant cost increases, and to increase our reliability for our customers, we ' are proposing to remove the existing "hard line" telephone lines and replace with a panel antenna which will transfer the signal wirelessly, thereby connecting with other cellular sites in the area. Statement of Operations The existing AT&T communication facility only requires electrical services which are readily available to the building/site. No nuisances will be generated by the proposed facility; nor will the facility injure the public health, safety, morals or general welfare of the community. AT&T CN0I I0 The Antenna Company I ZAP ■moi AT&T technology does not interfere with any other forms of communication devices whether public or private. The additions/maintenance of this facility will actually enhance wireless communications for residents or motorists traveling by providing seamless service to numerous customers. As mentioned before, upon completion of construction, fine-tuning of the AT&T facility may be necessary, meaning the site will be adjusted once or twice a month by a service technician for routine maintenance. No additional parking spaces are needed at the project site for maintenance activities. The site is entirely self monitored and connects directly to a central office where sophisticated computers alert personnel to any equipment malfunction or breach of security. Because AT&T's facility will be un -staffed, there will be no regular hours of operation and no impact to existing traffic patterns. An existing dirt road will provide ingress and egress allowing access to the technician who arrives infrequently to service the site. No on-site water or sanitation services will be required as a part of this proposal. Zoning Analysis AT&T's proposed facility will be located within an (e) Cellular facility. Therefore, the "usage" is allowed, as we are merely "upgrading" the facility to eliminate the need for an additional cell site in the area. Additionally, as mentioned above, the proposal includes the placement of electronic equipment which AT&T has designed the base facility in the "least visual obtrusive manner". Compliance with Federal Regulations AT&T will comply with all FCC rules governing construction requirements, technical standards, interference protection, power and height limitations, and radio frequency standards. In addition, the company will comply with all FAA rules on site location and operation. BUTTE COUNTY DEC 10 2008 (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AT&T CN0110 The Antenna Company I ZAP ■ SP THOMAS tOMPANY OF N. eAL, INC. December 1,2008 AT&T Wireless Attention:Jason. Osborne Regardi . gs SP Thomas Company Tower BUTTE COUNTY DEC 10 2008 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To Whom. It May Concern: Please consider this letter your letter of authorization to install equipment on our tower at 3.415 Silverbell Rd' #8 Chico, CA: All equipment install must be listed on the lease in the equipment. schedule. Should you have any further questions please contact -me. Sincerely, phen P. Thomas 2530 DOUGLAS BLVD STE 130 ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 (916) 786-2040 (9.16) 786-2155 FAX Ll k/ r� 1 *, M ��oz_o6 to Z 0.? • PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE NO.: MUPOS-0002 PROJECT TYPE: MINOR USE PERMIT APN: 007-390-001 APPLICANT: Jason Orbome, Osborne & Assoc ADDRESS: 701 5th St., Petaluma, CA94952 PHONE: (415) 559-2121 FAX: (415) 358-5766 OWNER: REHKLAU JOHN P, ADDRESS: 4318 KATHY LNCHICO, CA95973 0 REPRESENTATIVE: <undefined value> ADDRESS: <undefined value><undefined value>, <undefined value> <undefined value> PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The application requests collocation of six (6) 4.33 -foot panel antennae at the 90 -foot height on an existing 120 -foot self supporting tower and the installation of ground equipment within existing equipment room. The existing tower was built in 1997 under Building Permit 96-1244 and subsequent collocations of antennae were approved via MUP 02-03 (approved on October 30, 2001). MUP 02-03 was exempted from CEQA review. PROJECT LOCATION: Site is in the C-2 Chico Airport land use compatibility zone. Site is located approximately 500' east of the intersection of Hwy 99 and Eaton Road on the western edge of APN 007-390-001, on space 48 of the light industrial court at #3415 Silverbell Road. The applicant has been informed that application is incomplete until site plan conforming to DDS specifications (showing location of tower on parcel) is received. PROPERTY ZONED: C-2 General Commercial GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: C — Commercial 1. Application accepted: 12/10/2008 (Incomplete) 2. Assigned To: Chris Tolley 3. Comments sent to: Public Works Director, Environmental Health, Assessor, LAFCo, Agricultural Commissioner, CDF 4. Sent to Inter -Departmental Review Committee (IDR): 5. Status Letter sent to applicant: 6. Date scheduled for IDR: 7. Comments received from: 8. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 9. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 10. Environmental Determination: Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: State Clearinghouse No. Categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration De Minims: Mitigation Negative Declaration Subject to Fish & Game: Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. — CEQA # Other 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Staff Recommends: Approval Denial Date Notices Mailed: Neg Dec. Hearing Number of Notices: Newspaper Publication Date: Neg Dec. Hearing 0 C Planning Commission Hearing(s): Action taken: Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No:. Adopted: Type: MUP Minor Use Permit Send for signature: N.O.E. / N.O.D. / APPENDIX G: Fish & Game Fees Paid: Send letter if approval/denial to applicant/representative: Copies to Environmental Health, Building, Land Development: Assessor's Memo: Copy MINOR USE PERMIT to GIS: P G B Yes No Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARC`O, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile www.buttecounty.net/dds www.buttegeneralplan.net ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * PLANNING January 19, 2010 Osborne & Associates 701 5th Street Petaluma, CA 94952 Re: Application Withdrawn — MUP08-0002 (APN 007-390-001) Dear Osborne & Associates: Per an email received from Frank Schabarum, the above application has been deemed withdrawn. I have closed out the project file and sent it to the administrative accounting staff. They will begin the fiscal closeout and prepare the refund of the Fish and Game Fee ($1993.00), the.Notice of Determination Recorder's Fee ($50.00) and the Publishing Deposit ($157.40). I also noticed in the project file a check for $75.00 to the Northeast Information Center. The project was not sent to them for review so I'm returning the check. If you have any questions, please contact me at 030) 538-7376 or by email at mmichelenagabuttecounty.net. Thank you. Sincerely, AAW /W�" Mark Michelena Senior Planner • Pagel of 3.,.:. Michelena; Mark From: jason_osborne@sbcglobal.net Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 8:16 AM To: Michelena, Mark; Frank Schabarum Cc: -Thistlethwaite, Charles; DeBrunner, Deborah; Lewellen, Diane Subject: Re: AT&T - MUP08-0002 - CN00110? Confirmed. Thank you, Jason Osborne, Principal Osborne & Associates 415-559-2121 mobile 415-358-5766 fax Osborne & Associates 765 Baywood Drive, Suite 325 Petaluma, Ca 94954 From: "Michelena, Mark" <MMichelena@buttecounty.net> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:56:40 -0800 To: Frank Schabarum<frank.schabarum@sbcglobal.net>; Jason Osborne<jason_osborne@sbcglobal.net> Cc: Thistlethwaite, Charles<CThistlethwaite@buttecounty.net>; DeBrunner, Deborah<DDeBrunner@buttecounty.net>; Lewellen, Diane<DLewellen@buttecounty.net> Subject: RE: AT&T - MUP08-0002 - CN00110? Frank and Jason, I will take your email as a request for MUP08-0002 to be withdrawn. I will begin the process to close out the project file. Thank you. Sincerely, Mark Michelena Senior Planner, Planning Division Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538.7376 (530) 538-2140 Fax mm ichel enaAbuttecounty. net "COUNTY OF BUTTE E-MAIL DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this e-mail (or any attachments thereto) by other than the County of Butte or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto." From: Frank Schabarum [mailto:frank.schabarum@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010.10:12 AM . To: Jason Osborne; Michelena, Mark Subject: AT&T - MUP08-0002 - CN00110? 1/19/2010 Page 2 of Jason and Mark, As much as I tried, I could not get AT&T RF engineering to agree to a collocation on The Tower Company Tower which is the subject site for MUP08-0002. RF ended up approving a candidate site on Esplanade south of this location. Frank Schabarum Wireless Site Development Specialist 10615 Quail Hollow Lane Redding, CA 96003 Office Phone: 530-722-0743 Mobile Phone: 619-743-0309 frank. schabarum@sbcglobal. net --- On Sun, 1/17/10, Jason Osborne Jason osborne@sbcglobaLnet> wrote: From: Jason Osborne <jason_osborne@sbcglobal.net> Subject: FW: MUP08-0002 - CN00110? To: "'Frank Schabarum"' <frank.schabarum@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sunday, January 17, 2010, 9:46 AM Frank, did you ever pursue this site in Chico (Butte jurisdiction)? Thank you, Jason Osborne, Principal Osborne & Associates 415-559-2121 mobile 415-358-5766 fax From: Michelena, Mark[ma ilto:MMichelena@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:14 AM To: jason_osborne@sbcglobal.net Subject: MUP08-0002 Importance: High Jason, I just you a phone message and thought it might be prudent to also email you. I was going through my project files and noticed that this Minor Use Permit has sat incomplete (see attached letter) for over a year now. It was incomplete due to no site plan submitted with the application. If you are still interested in pursuing this project, please provide me with a site plan (see attached example). The site plan needs to show all existing and proposed improvements. The application packet did include detail plans about the antennas and ground equipment. I would very much like to move this project forward to the Planning Commission. If you are still interested in moving forward with the project, please provide a site plan. If you are.no longer interested, please email me a request to withdraw the application. Thank you very much. 1/19/2010 Page Iof3';..... Sincerely, Mark Michelena Senior Planner, Planning Division Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 (530)538-7376 (530) 538-2140 Fax mm ichelenaO,buttecounty.net "COUNTY OF BUTTE E-MAIL DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for, the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this e-mail (or any attachments thereto) by other than the County of Butte or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto." 1/19/2010 Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile www.buttecounty.net/dds www.butte-generalplan.net ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * PLANNING. MEMORANDUM TO: Diane Lewellen — Development Services FROM: Mark Michelena SUBJECT: MUP08-0002 — Osborne — Application Withdrawn DATE: January 19, 2010 This project has been withdrawn. Please see attached email. Please begin refund process on the Fish and Game Fee, NOD Recorder's Fee and publishing fee. I have put in all my time as of this memo. This project came in on December 10, 2008. Thank you. 1 • • Page 1 of 3 Michelena, Mark From: Michelena, Mark Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 7:57 AM To: 'Frank Schabarum'; Jason Osborne Cc: Thistlethwaite, Charles; DeBrunner, Deborah; Lewellen, Diane Subject: RE: AT&T - MUP08-0002 - CN00110? Frank and Jason, I will take your email as a request for MUP08-0002 to be withdrawn. I will begin the process to close out the project file. Thank you. Sincerely, Mark Michelena Senior Planner, Planning Division Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7376 (530) 538-2140 Fax mmichelena(a buttecounty.net "COUNTY OF BUTTE E-MAIL DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this e-mail (or any attachments thereto) by other than the County of Butte or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto." From: Frank Schabarum [mailto:frank.schabarum@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 10:12 AM To: Jason Osborne; Michelena, Mark Subject: AT&T - MUP08-0002 - CN00110? . Jason and Mark, As much as I tried, I could not get AT&T RF engineering to agree to a collocation on The Tower Company Tower which is the subject site for MUP08-0002. RF ended up approving a candidate site on Esplanade south of this location. Frank Schabarum Wireless Site Development Specialist 10615 Quail Hollow Lane Redding, CA 96003 Office Phone: 530-722-0743 Mobile Phone: 619-743-0309 frank. Schabarum@sbcglobal. net --- On Sun, 1/17/10, Jason Osborne <jason_osbornel@sbcglobaLnet> wrote: 1/19/2010 • • Page 2 of 3 From: Jason Osborne <jason_osborne@sbcglobal.net> Subject: FW: MUP08-0002 - CN00110? To: "'Frank Schabarum"' <frank.schabarum@sbcglobal.net> Date::Sunday; January 17, 2010, 9:46 AM Frank, did you ever pursue this site in Chico (Butte jurisdiction)? Thank you, Jason Osborne, Principal Osborne & Associates 415-559-2121 mobile 415-358-5766 fax From: Michelena, Mark[mailto:MMichelena@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:14 AM To: jason_osborne@sbcglobal.net Subject: MUP08-0002 Importance: High Jason, I just you a phone message and thought it might be prudent to also email you. I was going through my project files and noticed that this Minor Use Permit has sat incomplete (see attached letter) for over a year now. It was incomplete due to no site plan submitted with the application. If you are still interested in pursuing this project, please provide me with a site plan (see attached example). The site plan needs to show all existing and proposed improvements. The application packet did include detail plans about the antennas and ground equipment. I would very much like to move this project forward to the Planning Commission. If you are still interested in moving forward with the project, please provide a site plan. If you are no longer interested, please email me a request to withdraw the application. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Mark Michelena Senior Planner, Planning Division Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7376 (530) 538-2140 Fax mmichelena(o-),buttecounty.net "COUNTY OF BUTTE E-MAIL DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this e-mail 1/19/2010 • 0 Page 3 of 3 (or any attachments thereto) by other than the County of Butte or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto." 1/19/2010 Tolley, .Chris From: Lightell, Sue Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 1:57 PM To: Tolley, Chris Subject: RE: New reviews have been added to Project MUP08-0002 ' No problems seen. Sue Lightell Assessor Mapping Dept. -----Original Message ----- From: Tolley, Chris Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 3:09 PM To: Hill, Rob; Assessor Mapping; Fowler, Steve; Stover, Joy; Parker, Kathy; Bonham, Tina Subject: New reviews have been added to Project MUP08-0002 The following reviews for Project MUP08-0002 have been added: Ag. Commissioner Assessor Mapping Fire Marshall LAFCO LD Projects Planning Support 0-1)R�-FT • Northeast Center of the California historical Resources Information System Request for Proiect Review Project Reference Number: MUP08-0002 Project Title/ Applicant Name: Jason Orborne, Osborne & Assoc Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 007-390-001 Acres/ Linear Miles: 1.22 Acres Street Address: 3415 SILVERBELL RD, CHICO, CA 95926 Project Description: The application'requests collocation of six (6) 4.33 -foot panel antennae at the 90 -foot height on an existing 120 -foot self supporting tower and the installation of ground equipment within existing equipment room. The existing tower was built in 1997 under Building Permit 96-1244 and subsequent collocations of antennae were approved via MUP 02-03 (approved on October 30, 2001). MUP 02-03 was exempted from CEQA review. PROJECT LOCATION: Site is in the C-2 Chico Airport land use compatibility zone. Site is located approximately 500' east of the intersection of Hwy 99 and Eaton Road on the western edge of APN 007-390-001, on space #8 of the light industrial court at #3415 Silverbell Road. The applicant lias Geeri'iriforined that application is incomplete until site plan conforming to DDS .. specifications (showing -location of tower on parcel) is received: -' Project Location: Chico Township: Range: USGS 7.5' Topographic Quadrangle Map(s): Section(s Please enclose a copy of the relevant portion of the USGS 7.5' quadrangle map (1:1) with the project area clearly and accurately outlined Contact Person/Planner: Chris Tolley Contact Phone Number: (530) 538-7603 ***Please include pertinent project appkcation paperwork describing the nature of the project, potential ground disturbance, and existing modificatans to the property. California State University, Chico BUTTE GLENN SIERRA Building 25, Suite 204 LASSEN SISKIYOU Chico California 95929-0377 MODOC PLUMAS SUTTER TEHAMA Phone (530) 898-6256 TRINITY SHASTA Fax (530) 898-4413 neinfocntr&suchico. edu Request for Proiect Review Project Reference Number: MUP08-0002 Project Title/ Applicant Name: Jason Orborne, Osborne & Assoc Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 007-390-001 Acres/ Linear Miles: 1.22 Acres Street Address: 3415 SILVERBELL RD, CHICO, CA 95926 Project Description: The application'requests collocation of six (6) 4.33 -foot panel antennae at the 90 -foot height on an existing 120 -foot self supporting tower and the installation of ground equipment within existing equipment room. The existing tower was built in 1997 under Building Permit 96-1244 and subsequent collocations of antennae were approved via MUP 02-03 (approved on October 30, 2001). MUP 02-03 was exempted from CEQA review. PROJECT LOCATION: Site is in the C-2 Chico Airport land use compatibility zone. Site is located approximately 500' east of the intersection of Hwy 99 and Eaton Road on the western edge of APN 007-390-001, on space #8 of the light industrial court at #3415 Silverbell Road. The applicant lias Geeri'iriforined that application is incomplete until site plan conforming to DDS .. specifications (showing -location of tower on parcel) is received: -' Project Location: Chico Township: Range: USGS 7.5' Topographic Quadrangle Map(s): Section(s Please enclose a copy of the relevant portion of the USGS 7.5' quadrangle map (1:1) with the project area clearly and accurately outlined Contact Person/Planner: Chris Tolley Contact Phone Number: (530) 538-7603 ***Please include pertinent project appkcation paperwork describing the nature of the project, potential ground disturbance, and existing modificatans to the property. Agreement For lvw v g -- Butte County Archaeological Resources Project Review By r The Northeast Information Center (NEIC) 415P010 Z The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is the California State statute that requires the Butte County Department of Development Services to perform an environmental review on all discretionary land use projects, to identify the significant environmental impacts of the project and to avoid or mitigate those impacts, if feasible. Every development project which requires a discretionary governmental approval will require at least some environmental review pursuant to CEQA, unless an exemption applies. The environmental review required imposes both procedural and substantive requirements. At a minimum, an initial review of the project and its environmental effects must be conducted. Depending upon the potential effects, a furlier and more substantial review may be conducted in the form of an environmental impact report (EIR). A project may not be approved if feasible alternatives or mitigation measures cannot substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of the project. At the state level, CEQA requires that public agencies consider the effects of their actions on historical resources eligible for listing on the California Re&ter of Historical Resources. "Historical resource" refers to buildings, structures, sites (prehistoric and historic), objects, districts, and all maaner, of properties containing material remains of past human life or activity. The Department of Development Services utilizes the Northeast Information Center (NEIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) to identify projects that may have archaeological significance. The CHRIS is a statewide system for managing information on the full range of historical resources identified in California. This system is under the authority and direction of the Office of Historic Preservation (OHP), the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), and the State Historical Resources Commission (SHRC). The Northeast Center of the CHRIS system, located at California State University, Chico, manages the historical resource records for I I coumies, including Butte County. The Northeast Information Center will furnish a Record Search to Development Services indicating the archaeological/historical significance and sensitivity of the applicant's project area and additionally providing a recommendation as to whether further archaeological survey is warranted. If further archaeological survey is required, the application would be considered incomplete until the appropriate archaeological survey is completed and reviewed. The Department of Development Services will forward applicant's payment (by check) of $75.00 and relevant project application information required for the Records Search to NEIC. NEIC will provide the results of the Records Search to Development Services. Development Services will notify the applicant if further archaeological survey is wan -anted. The $75.00 fee does not cover the cost of further archaeological survey work. If further archaeological survey work is required, Development Services will work with the applicant to see that it is accomplished, according to set standards, by a qualified archaeologist. The applicant shall bear all costs associated with further archaeological survey work required to continue processing of the planning project application. TIES FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF A 7.5' TOPO MAP, WITH THE PROJECT AREA OUTLINED. THIS IS USED DURING THE REVIEW TO RESEARCH CULTURAL SITES. The undersigned applicant for the project as identified below has read and understood the Butte County Archaeological Resources Project Review process and agrees to fund the required Record Search to be provided by NEIC. Attached is a check for $75.00 made payable to the Northeast Information Center for NEIC to perform the Records Search. Failure of payment to NEIC for this Records Search would result in the planning project application to be considered incomplete until payment of the $75.00 Records Search fee along with any related fees associated with non-payment (returned check charges, etc.) paid in full to NEIC. ant Signature rnc App scant PRINTED Name S (0 B 9 Check Number Ctm,s 'T ! lei, 1AU P 09 -00o'Z Planner, File Numbei Revised 12/05/06 K:\Planning\FORMS\Applications\ProjectinfoForin—Agent—NEIC.doc Date it �Vzi •`+. Ci r • r' ti 11 lo rl • '� �}.>� ' � � f F �`'� r r j 1 / ••' '�-y .r �:, wr �y k �+• , '>, 1 r "Ir .,, , t^�. � �'-' r ib,r • yam, � "�:: �` �, ;r .� ll��•-�.:2 �J_ -'. r`'-, � ,, r✓ `•I _"'._rte'. �.f. ' 1 ''L � 4 � - ill � ..� of r.....� ,•'� `, s� ..�� �}-rr r ti ,.4146C... ti �� "`" l��- ',a4 z:�o. c` ,• . fit r: �i� $¢��t Moll000 rA •s a ,, h ��+ 5!a sDpt »l0:1 �t Q0GQC+` a •90t 1 �r ;AOR 1Q ^� t� „��,v-„�'.� . �a`1.;,.,fj - `' � ) rti l� w =' . �` O p X n h r �, ':iati ' QQ ►O 40.01 p 1011 f -'041 a taR filo "oatsV_ h-. F. Ll•.. oq a.>. -+recd,. *Or j I ��� lam%• K� itt oatra- j � r 'CU � A d t%#, � t r � + J:Q �+• ' 1.. ON ,pA , t rno�o �, `�o'a � - �` ., '` ;'���!i�� :ort• rnQC� - t� r( •,e t�� d 1 r a f r,k�;f, 02 ,o64 .....•s- - r- -- -. _;�-.�...,.--i_ ._.__ ., � P< tom` err trate aOtk �� DO C3 , QOM D 70 ZQO 0p . ' ♦b� `�, � 004 bl. Oj� 10,06 0 ,"Ce0t nt 4w. Na030 e. ttb moo. tgo st t • tip; J'j Q4 I ti �� N y C1 cO�at �' - r � ems'' •-� ' L ry� r- ....�....=,i�-....:.. _� ..— _ _ _ ' �►c-_r._ _ � __, y �; _•__-�„R ,-'- - -'lig ty?aOUh. ��w r a ,so� ^ryy'►� v � • f FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMIS C04PLIANCEI STUDY V? \ NON -IONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC:RADI FIELDS EXPOSURE- Prepared XPOSUREPrepared for: e at&t ^ M 10 0 se a [i. LIV<dIIV LL - I 111V LJ i i i ON (FCC) A� b 0 q Q nCN0140 THE ANTENNA COMPANY -I' N t ER 3415 SILVBELL ROAD CHICO, CX -95973 � 6 4 i U DECEMBER ,12/08, REV. 0 . 1 The Antenna Company CN0110 December 12, 2008, Rev. 0 ENGINEERING Page 1 SITE DESCRIPTION: Carrier: AT&T Address: 3415 Silverbell Road, Chico, CA 95973 Type of Service: 1. UMTS, 2. GSM 1900 MHz and 850 MHz Broadband PCS Sectors: 3 sector A: 80°, sector B: 320°, sector C: 200° Antenna Type: Kathrein 742 264 Number of Antennas: 12 4 per sector Maximum Power: 500 W (Maximum ERP per technologyper sector) Antenna Height: 85'f (Radiation centerAGL) Table 1 AT&T RF summary AT&T is proposing to deploy UMTS and GSM services by co -locating 3 sectors of antennas on an existing 120' self support tower at the above address (Figure 1). Four existing wireless telecommunications facility are co -locating on the same tower. AT&T will install twelve directional antennas on the tower at 85' above ground level. Six new equipment cabinets will be housed inside the building beside the tower, similar to the existing carriers. The tower is enclosed with 6' chain link fence and gates. Access to the facility is restricted to authorized personnel. Figure 1. Area surrounding facility • The Anna Company CNO110 December 12, 2008, Rev. 0 Pate 2 The RF summaries of the existing wireless telecommunications facilities on the tower are shown in the following Tables. Carrier: Clearwire Wireless Broadband Type of Service: MMDS Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service Antenna Type: Stella Doradus 26 SD98, Kathrein 840-10057 Maximum Power: 500 W (Maximum ERP per sector) Antenna Height: 126'-6"±, (Radiation center AGL) Table 2 Clearwire RF summary Carrier: Metro PCS Type of Service: 190OMHz CDMA (Broadband PCS) Antenna Type: Decibel DB950 (typical) Maximum Power: 500 W (Maximum ERP per sector) Antenna Height: 120'±, (Radiation centerAGL) Table 3 Metro PCS RF summary Carrier: Skytel Type of Service: Paging Antenna Type: Decibel DB806-XT (typical) Maximum Power: 500 W (Maximum ERP per sector) Antenna Height: 100'± (Radiation center AGL) Table 4 Skytel RF summary Carrier: USA Mobility Type of Service: Paging, Cellular Voice, Data Antenna Type: Decibel DB806TL-XT, DB586-XT (typical) Maximum Power: 500 W (Maximum ERP) Antenna Height: 100'± (Radiation center AGL) Table 5 USA Mobility RF summary There are also existing Clearwire point-to-point microwave antennas installed on top the tower. These antennas transmit radio frequency power in a well-defined collimated beam with little angular divergence which is highly directional in nature. Because of the mounting height of the antennas, the power densities existing at locations where people may be typically exposed are substantially less than on -axis power densities, and the RF exposure contribution can be considered insignificant compare to panel antennas. PROTOCOL: This study, and the calculations performed therein, is based on OET Bulletin 65, which adopts ANSI C95.1-1992 and NCRP standards. In particular, equation 10 from section 2 of the guideline is used as a model (in conjunction with known antenna radiation patterns) for calculating the power density at different points of interest. This information will be used to judge the RF exposure level incident upon the general population, and any employee present in the area. It should be noted that ground reflection of RF waves has been taken into account. ' Cleveland, Robert F, et al. Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, August 1997. • The Antenna Company CNO110 December 12, 2008, Rev. 0 Page 3 FCC'S MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE (MPE) LIMIT: In order to evaluate the RF exposure level, the power densities at different locations of interest have been examined. Equation 10 from Bulletin 65 is reproduced here as equation 1: S _ 33AF2ERP 1 R2 ) Where; S = Power density [9W/cm2] ERP = Effective radiated power [W] R = Distance [m] F = Relative field factor (relative numeric gain) Scenario 1: Maximum Exposure near facility The RF exposure level of a six-foot tall person standing close to the facilities is evaluated. For the worst-case scenario, we assume that the antennas of all carriers are transmitting the maximum number of channels at the same time, with each channel at its maximum power level. In addition, the azimuths of the antennas of all carriers are assumed to be in the direction of the studied location. Please refer to scenario 1 in appendix A for the complete geometry and analysis. The highest exposure location is found to be approximately 69' from the tower. The calculations of maximum power density are summarized in Table 6. Service_ Max. ERP F2 R m S uW/cm2 MPE % AT&T UMTS 850 500 W -12 dB 0.0158 34.1 0.9084 0.1566 AT&T UMTS 1900 500 W -15 dB 0.0050 34.1 0.4549 0.0455 AT&T GSM 850 500 W -12 dB 0.0100 34.1 0.9084 0.1566 AT&T GSM 1900 500 W -15 dB 0.0158 34.1 0.4549 0.0455 Clearwire 100 W -30 dB 0.0010 43.9 0.0017 0.0002 Metro PCS 500 W -20 dB 0.0200 42.3 0.0934 0.0093 USA Mobility 500 W -13 dB 0.0016 37.4 0.5969 0.1029 Skytel 500 W -13 dB 0.0100 37.4 0.5969 0.1029 Total 0.6195 Table 6 Worst-case predicted power density values for scenario 1. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit for 1900 MHz PCS facility for general population/uncontrolled exposure is 1000 uW/cm2, and 580 µW/cm2 for 850 MHz facility2. At this location, the power density from the facility is calculated to be 0.62% of the MPE limit. Scenario 2: Maximum Exposure on nearby buildings There are commercial and low density residential buildings in the surrounding area. The RF exposure levels on the rooftop of nearby buildings are evaluated. Again, we assume all antennas are transmitting with maximum power level at the same time. Please refer to scenario 2 in appendix A for the complete geometry and analysis. The highest exposure location is found to be approximately 49' from the tower. The calculations for the maximum possible power density are shown in Table 7. 2 Ibid., page 67. The Antenna Company CN0110 December 12,2008, Rev. 0 D ENGINEERING i age 4 Service Max. ERP F2 R m S (uW/cm-I MPE % AT&T UMTS 850 500 W -12 dB 0.0158 27.4 1.4057 0.2424 AT&T UMTS 1900 500 W -15 dB 0.0050) 27.4 0.7039 0.0704 AT&T GSM 850 500 W -12 dB (0.0100) 27.4 1.4057 0.2424 AT&T GSM 1900 500 W -15 dB (0.0158) 27.4 0.7039 0.0704 Clearwire 100 W -30 dB (0.0010) 37.5 0.0024 0.0002 Metro PCS 500 W -20 dB (0.0200) 35.8 0.1304 0.0130 USA Mobility 500 W -13 dB (0.0016) 30.8 1 0.8814 0.1520 Skytel 500 W -13 dB 0.0100) 30.8 0.8814 0.1520 Total 0.9438 Table 7 Worst-case predicted power density values for scenario 2: The maximum cumulative power density for the AT&T antennas and the existing facilities are calculated to be 0.94% of the MPE limit. There is a relatively low level of RF energy directed either above or below the horizontal plane of the antennas, and there are no locations in the surrounding areas near the compound that will have RF exposure levels close to the MPE limit. Conclusion: Under "worst-case" conditions, the calculations shown above predict that the maximum possible RF exposure is 0.94% of the MPE limit. There will be less RF exposure ori the ground level or nearby buildings as a person moves away from the site. Therefore, the proposed modifications to AT&T facility in co -location with the existing wireless telecommunications facilities will comply with the general population/uncontrolled limit. FCC COMPLIANCE: Only trained persons will be permitted to access the facilities and the antennas. They will be made fully aware of the potential for RF exposure and can choose to exercise control over their exposure that is within the occupational/controlled limits which is 5 times higher than the uncontrolled limits. The general population/uncontrolled exposure near the facilities, including persons on the ground level, in nearby open areas, and inside or on existing nearby buildings will have RF exposure much lower than the "worst-case" scenario, which is only a small percentage of the MPE limit: Sei Yuen Sylvan Wong, PE California PE Reg. No. E 16850 SYLV yl` N 16850 Q EXP. 12/31/YD F�FCT'R `F 12 ', ZOo� E, FCC'S MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE (MPE Equation 10 from Bulletin 65 is reproduced here as eq S - 33APERP R2 Where: 5 = Power density [,uW/cni'J ERP = Effective radiated power NM R = Distance [m] F = Relative,field factor (relative numeric gain) Scenario 1: Standing Near The Facility The highest exposure location at ground from the ant( Lp = Hp x tan"(0) R, = JH,2+L,2 Relative Field Factor at 0 F' Fz = 10 10 (in term of power density) person's height (HM) = 6 ft • V 4D At O = 75 ° . the exoosure location at around from the tower L, = 21 ft Service Provider Height HG, ft Height HP, ft Max. ERP Angle O Fz Rp(m) S (NW/cm2) MPE% AT&T GSM 850 85.00 79.00 500.0 O = 75 ° -22 dB ( 0.0063 ) 24.9 0.1691 0.0292 AT&T GSM'1900 85.00 79.00 500.0 O = 75 ° -15 dB ( 0.0316 ) 24.9 0.8484 0.0848 AT&T UMTS 850 85.00 79.00 500.0 O = 75 ° -22 dB ( 0.0063 ) 24.9 0.1691 0.0292 AT&T UMTS 1900 85.00 79.00 ' 500.0 O = 75 ° -15 dB ( 0.0318 ) 24.9 0.8484 0.0848 Clearwire 126.50 120.50 100.0 O = 80 -35 dB ( 0.0003 ) 37.3 0.0007 0.0001 Metro PCS' 120.00 114.00 500.0 O = 79 ° -35 dB ( 0.0003 ) 35.4 0.0040, 0.0004 USA Mobility 100.00 94.00 500.0 O = 77 -12 dB ( 0.0631 ') 29.4 1.2208 0.2105 Skytel 100.00 94.00 500.0 O = 77 -12 dB ( 0.0631 ) 29.4 1.2208 0.2105 Total 0.6495 At O = 60 ° , the exposure location at around from the tower L, = 46 ft Service Provider Height FIG, ft Height Hp, ft Max. 'ERP Angle O F z Rp(m) S (NW/cm2) , MPE/o AT&T GSM 850 85.00 79.00 500.0 O = 60 ° -22 dB ( 0.0063 ) 27.8 0.1360 0.0234 AT&T GSM 1900 85.00 79.00 500.0 O = 60,' -20 dB ( 0.0100 ) 27.8 0.2159 0.0216 AT&T UMTS 850 85.00 79.00 500.0 O = 60 ° -22 dB ( 0.0063 ) 27.8 0.1360 0.0234 AT&T UMTS 1900 85.00 79.00 500.0 O = 60 -20 dB ( 0.0100 ) 27.8 ;'0.2159 0.0216 Clearwire 126.50 120.50 100.0 O = 69 -30 d6 ( 0.0010 ) 39.3 0.0022 0.0002 Metro PCS 120.00 114.00 500.0 O = 68 -30 dB ( 0.0010 ) 37.4 0.0119 0.0012 USA Mobility 100.00 94.00 500.0 O = 64 -10 dB ( 0.1000 ) 31.9 1.6463 0.2838 Skytel 100.00 94.00 500.0 O = 64 ° -10 dB ( 0.1000 ) 31.9 1.6463 0.2838 Total 0.6590 1of3 • At 0 = 45 ° . the exposure location at around from the tower Lo = 79 ft s Service Provider Height HG, ft Height Hp, ft Max. ERP Angle O F z F Z RP(m) S (NW/cm2) o MPE/o AT&T GSM 850 85.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 45 -12 dB ( 0.0631 ) 34.1 0.9084 0.1566 AT&T GSM 1900 85.00 79.00 500:0 0 = 45 -15 dB ( 0.0316 ) 34.1 0.4549 0.0455 AT&T UMTS 850 85.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 45 ° -12 dB ( 0.0631 ) 34.1 0.9084 0.1566 AT&T UMTS 1900 85.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 45 ° -15 dB ( 0.0316 ) 34.1 0.4549 0.0455 Clearwire 126.50 120.50 100.0 0 = 57 -30 dB ( 0.0010 ) 43.9 0.0017 0.0002 Metro PCS 120.00 114.00 500.0 0 = 55 -20 dB ( 0.0100 ) 42.3 0.0934 0.0093 USA Mobility 100.00 94.00 500.0 0 = 50 -13 dB ( 0.0501 ) 37.4 0.5969 0.1029 Skytel 100.00 94.00 500.0 0 = 50 -13 dB ( 0.0501 ) 37.4 0.5969 0.1029 0.1113 Total Total 0.1606 0.6195 At 0 = 30 ° . the exposure location at around from the tower Lo = 137 ft Service Provider Height Ha, ft Height Hp, ft Max. ERP Angle O F a F Z Rp(m) S (NW/cm2) ° MPE/o AT&T GSM 850 85.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 30 -15 dB ( 0.0316 ) 48.2 0.2274 0.0392 AT&T GSM 1900 85.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 30 -20 dB ( 0.0100 ) 48.2 0.0720 0.0072 AT&T UMTS 850 85.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 30 -15 'dB ( 0.0316 ) 48.2 0.2274 0.0392 AT&T UMTS 1900 85.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 30 -20 dB ( 0.0100 ) 48.2 0.0720 0.0072 Clearwire 126.50 120.50 100.0 0 = 41 -30 dB ( 0.0010 ) 55.6 0.0011 0.0001 Metro PCS 120.00 114.00 500.0 0 = 40 -17 dB ( 0.0200 ) 54.3 0.1133 0.0113 USA Mobility 100.00 94.00 500.0 0 = 34 -16 dB ( 0.0251 ) 50.6 0.1637 0.0282 Skytel 100.00 94.00 500.0 0 = 34 ° -16 dB ( 0.0251 ) 50.6 0.1637 0.0282 0.0204 0.1113 Total Total 0.1606 At 0 = 15 ° . the exposure location at around from the tower La = 295 ft Service Provider Height HG, ft Height Hp, ft Max. ERP Angle O Fs F Z Rp(m) S (NW/cm2) MPE% AT&T GSM 850 85.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 15 ° -10 dB ( 0.1000 ) 93.1 0.1928 0.0332 AT&T GSM 1900 85.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 15 ° -13 dB ( 0.0501 ) 93.1 0.0966 0.0097 AT&T UMTS 850 85.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 15 -10 dB ( 0.1000 ) 93.1 0.1928 0.0332 AT&T UMTS 1900 85.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 15 -13 dB ( 0.0501 ) 93.1 0.0966 0.0097 Clearwire 126.50 120.50 100.0 O = 22 -16 dB ( 0.0251 ) 97.1 0.0089 0.0009 Metro PCS 120.00 114.00 500.0 O = 21 -16 dB ( 0.0251 ) 96.4 0.0451 0.0045 USA Mobility 100.00 94.00 500.0 0 = 18 -12 dB ( 0.0631 ) 94.4 0.1184 0.0204 Skytel 100.00 94.00 500.0 0 = 18 ° -12 dB ( 0.0631 ) 94.4 0.1184 0.0204 0.1113 Total 0.1320 At 0 = 5 ° , the exposure location at around from the tower Lp = 903 ft Service Provider Height HG, ft Height Hp, ft Max. ERP Angle O F Z RP(m) S (NW/cm2) ° MPE/o AT&T GSM 850 85.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 5 -2 dB ( 0.6310 ) 276.4 0.1380 0.0238 AT&T GSM 1900 85.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 5 -5 dB ( 0.3162 ) 276.4 0.0691 0.0069 AT&T UMTS 850 85.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 5 -2 dB ( 0.6310 ) 276.4 0.1380 0.0238 AT&T UMTS 1900 85.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 5 ° -5 dB ( 0.3162 ) 276.4 0.0691 0.0069 Clearwire 126.50 120.50 100.0 0 = 8 -12 dB ( 0.0631 ) 277.7 0.0027 0.0003 Metro PCS 120.00 114.00 500.0 0 = 7 ° -10 dB ( 0.1000 ) 277.5 0.0217 0.0022 USA Mobility 100.00 94.00 500.0 0 = 6 -2 dB ( 0.6310 ) 276.8 0.1376 0.0237 Skytel 100.00 94.00 500.0 0 = 6 -2 dB ( 0.6310 ) 276.8 0.1376 0.0237 Total 0.1113 2of3 Scenario 2: Nearby Buildings/Rooftops LP = HP x tan'(0) RP = fHp5.LpZ Relative Field Factor at 0 F2 F2= 10 10 (in term of power density) Low r person's height (HM) = 6 ft At 0 = 75 ° , the exposure location at around from the tower L, = 17 ft HQ = 15 ft Service Provider Height Ha, ft Height HP, ft Max. ERP Angle 0 F 2 RP(m) S (NW/cm2) MPE/o AT&T GSM 850 85.00 64.00 500.0 0 = 75 -22 d8 ( 0.0063 ) 20.2 0.2584 0.0446 AT&T GSM 1900 85.00 64.00 500.0 0 = 75 °' -15 dB ( 0.0316 ) 20.2 1.2959 0.1296 AT&T UMTS 850 85.00 64.00 500.0 0 = 75 ° -22 dB ( 0.0063 ) 20.2 0.2584 0.0446 AT&T UMTS 1900 85.00 64.00 500.0 0 = 75 -15 dB ( 0.0316 ) 20.2 1.2959 0.1296 Clea ire 126.50 1 105.50 100.0 0 = 81 -35 dB ( 0.0003 ) 32.6 0.0009 0.0001 Metro PCS 120.00 99.00 500.0 0 = 80 ° -35 dB ( 0.0003 ) 30.6 0.0053 0.0005 USA Mobility 100.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 78 ° -12 dB ( 0.0631 ) 24.6 1.7371 0.2995 Skytel 100.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 78 -12 dB ( 0.0631 ) 24.6 1.7371 0.2995 Total Total 0.9428 0.9480 At 0 = 60 ° , the exposure location at around from the tower L. = 36 ft Ha = 15 ft Service Provider Height HG, ft Height HP, ft Max. ERP Angle O F 2 RP(m) S (NW/cm2) MPE /a AT&T GSM 850 85.00 64.00 500.0 0 = 60 -22 dB ( 0.0063 ) 22.4 0.2089 0.0360 AT&T GSM 1900 85.00 64.00 500.0 0 = 60 -20 dB ( 0.0100 ) 22.4 0.3316 0.0332 AT&T UMTS 850 85.00 64.00 500.0 0 = 60 -22 dB ( 0.0063 ) 22.4 0.2089 0.0360 AT&T UMTS 1900 85.00 64.00 500.0 0 = 60 -20 dB ( 0.0100 ) 22.4 0.3316 0.0332 Clearwire 126.50 105.50 100.0 0 = 71 -30 dB ( 0.0010 ) 34.0 0.0029 0.0003 Metro PCS 120.00 99.00 500.0 0 = 70 -30 dB ( 0.0010 ) 32.2 0.0161 0.0016 USA Mobility 100.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 65 -10 dB ( 0.1000 ) 26.5 2.3745 0.4094 Skytel 100.00 79.00 500.0 O = 65 -10 dB ( 0.1000 ) 26.5 2.3745 0.4094 Total Total 0.9428 0.9591 At O = 45 ° . the exposure location at around from the tower L. = 63 ft Ho = 15 ft Service Provider Height FIG, ft Height H , ft P Max. ERP Angle O F 2 RP(m) 'S (NW/cm2) MPE /o AT&T GSM 850 85.00 64.00 500.0 0 = 45 -12 dB ( 0.0631 ) 27.4 1.4057 0.2424 AT&T GSM 1900 85.00 64.00 500.0 O = 45 -15 dB ( 0.0316 ) 27.4 0.7039 0.0704 AT&T UMTS 850 85.00 64.00 500.0 O = 45 -12 dB ( 0.0631 ) 27.4 1.4057 0.2424 AT&T UMTS 1900 85.00 64.00 500.0 0 = 45 -15 dB ( 0.0316 ) 27.4 0.7039 0.0704 Cleanvire 126.50 105.50 100.0 0 = 59 -30 dB ( 0.0010 ) 37.5 0.0024 0.0002 Metro PCS 120.00 99.00 500.0 0 = 58 -20 dB ( 0.0100 ) 35.8 0.1304 0.0130 USA Mobility 100.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 51 -13 dB ( 0.0501 ) 30.8 0.8814 0.1520 Skytel 100.00 79.00 500.0 0 = 51 -13' dB ( 0.0501 ) 30.8 0.8814 0.1520 Total 0.9428 3of3 • SCALA DIVISION Kathrein's dual band antennas are ready for 3G applications, covering all existing wireless bands as well as all spectrum under consideration for future systems, AMPS, PCS and 3G/UMTS. These cross -polarized antennas offer diversity operation in the same space as a conventional 800 MHz antenna, and are mountable on our compact sector brackets. • Wide band operation. • Exceptional intermodulation characteristics. • Remote control ready. • Various gain, beamwidth and downtilt ranges. • AISG compatible. • High strength pultruded fiberglass radome. General specifications: Frequency range 824-960 MHz 1710-2180 MHz Impedance 50 ohms VSWR <1.5:1 Intermodulation (2x20w) IM3: -150 dBc Polarization +45° and -45° Connector 4 x 7/16 DIN female (long neck) Isolation intrasystem intersystem >30 d6 >50 d6 (824-960 // 1710-2180 MHz) Weight 36.4 Ib (16.5 kg) Dimensions 51.8 x 10.3 x 5.5 inches (1316 x 262 x 139 mm) Equivalent flat plate area 4.13 ft2 (0.384 mz) Wind survival rating' 120 mph (200 kph) sustained 150 mph (240 kph) in a 3 second burst Shipping dimensions 63.6 x 11.9 x 7.6 inches (1615 x 302 x 192 mm) Shipping weight 45 Ib (20.4 kg) Mounting Fixed mount options are available for 2 to 4.6 inch (50 to 115 mm) OD masts. See reverse for order information. • 742 264 650 Dualband Directional Antenna 824-960 MHz Horizontal pattern Vertical pattern x45°- polarization x45°- polarization 0°-14° electrical downtilt 1710-2180 MHz Horizontal pattern Vertical pattern x45°- polarization x45°- polarization 0°-8° electrical downtilt specifications: 824-894 MHz 870-960 MHz 1710-1880 MHz 1850-1990 MHz 1920-2180 MHz Gain 14 dBi 14 dBi 16.5 dBi 16.8 dBi 17 dBi Front -to -back ratio >26 dB (co -polar) >26 dB (co -polar) >25 d6 (co -polar) >25 d6 (co -polar) >25 d6 (co -polar) Maximum input power 14 14 13 dB 14 14 13 dI3 14 14 14 d6 16 16 15 dB 15 16 15 dB per input 500 watts (at 50°C) 500 watts (at 50°C) 250 watts (at 50°C) 250 watts (at 50°C) 250 watts (at 50°C) total power 1000 watts (at 50°C) 20 d6 (typical) 500 watts (at 50°C) 18 dB (typical) +45° and -45° polarization 68° (half -power) 651 (half -power) 650 (half -power) 651 (half -power) 63° (half -power) horizontal beamwidth +45° and -45° polarization 16° (half -power) 14.5° (half -power) 7.80 (half -power) 7.30 (half -power) 6.8° (half -power) vertical beamwidth Electrical downtilt 0°-14° 0°-14° 0°-8° 0°-8° 0°-8° continuously adjustable velocity. See the Engineering Section of the catalog for further details. 10633-K 936.2887/b Sidelobe suppression for 0° 7° 140T 0° 7° 14° T 0° 4° 8° T 00 4° 8° T 0° 4° 8° T first sidelobe above main beam 14 14 13 dB 14 14 13 dI3 14 14 14 d6 16 16 15 dB 15 16 15 dB Cross polar ratio Main direction 0° 20 dB (typical) 20 d6 (typical) 16 d6 (typical) 18 dB (typical) 20 dB (typical) Sector x60° >10d13 >10 dB >10 dB A 0 d6 >10 dB Kathrein Inc., Scala Division Post Office Box 4580 Medford, OR 97501 (USA) Phone: (541) 779-6500 Fax: (541) 779-3991 Email: communications@kathrein.com Internet: www.kathrein-scala.com "Mechanical design is based on environmental conditions as stipulated R01HS in EIA -222-F (June 1996) and/or ETS 300 019-1-4 which include the load imposed static mechanical on an antenna by wind at maximum §0.0. velocity. See the Engineering Section of the catalog for further details. 10633-K 936.2887/b Kathrein Inc., Scala Division Post Office Box 4580 Medford, OR 97501 (USA) Phone: (541) 779-6500 Fax: (541) 779-3991 Email: communications@kathrein.com Internet: www.kathrein-scala.com 4D��'tp AD�9 Steta Doradus Ireland Ltt. 2.6GHz SD98 High Gain Base Station The 26 SD98 is a high gain base station antenna designed for use in high density RF environments The excellent radiation characteristics are the distinguishing features of these antennas. Electrical Specification Mechanical Specifications Gain .16dBi 3dB beam Pattern 90° x 7° Length 35.8 inches Bandwidth 2.5-2.7GHz Width 5.5 inches VSWR 1.4: 1 Depth 4.5 inches Front to Back Ratio 35dB Weight 5.5lbs Polarization Vertical Windage(at 125mph) 86lbs front face on Power Rating 25W Mechanical Tilt 0-7 degrees Impedance 50 ohms Mounting Pipe 5 cm pipe Termination Fixed N- female Materials Cross Pol. Discrimination 30dB Radiating Element Beam forming PCB dipole array Radome Aluminium + ABS Grey Clamps HDG steel + stainless steel bolts ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��■■■■■■■■■■.�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ MEN ■��■■■■■/iii:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\���i��\■■■■■■�■MOM ■■PiE■\`IP■■IN■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MEN ■■■■■■■\\■W�M■ME�■■ ■I■■■■■■\`5■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►1■■■■■■\■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ t • R /-itin SCALA DIVISION Kathrein Scala's X -polarized adjustable electrical downtilt antennas offer the carrier the ability to tailor sites for optimum performance. Using variable downtilt, only a few models need be procured to accommodate the needs of widely varying conditions. Remotely controlled downtilt is available as a retrofitable option. • 0-100 electrical downtilt range. • DC Grounded metallic parts for impulse suppression. • No moving electrical connections. • Optional remote downtilt control. Specifications: Frequency range 2496-2690 MHz Gain 17 dBi Impedance 50 ohms VSWR < 1.5:1 Intermodulation (2x20w) IM3:< -150 dBc Polarization +45° and -45° Front -to -back ratio >25 dB typical Maximum input power 300 watts (at 50°C) +45° and -45° polarization horizontal beamwidth 65 degrees at midband (half power) +45° and -45° polarization vertical beamwidth 7 degrees at midband (half power) Electrical downtilt continously adjustable 0-10 degrees Connector 7/16 DIN female Sidelobe suppression for first sidelobe above horizon 00 4° 8° 10° 15 15 15 15 dB (typical) Null fill > -1 dBi to 12° below horizon (typical) (18 dB below 17 dBi main beam) Isolation >30 dB Weight 10 Ib (4.5 kg) Dimensions 42 x 6.1 x 2.7 inches (1067 x 155 x 69 mm) Equivalent flat plate area 2.5 ft2 (0.23 m2) Wind survival rating' 120 mph (200 kph) Shipping dimensions 48 x 6.8 x 3.6 inches (1220 x 172 x 92 mm) Shipping weight 13.6 Ib (6.2 kg) Mounting Fixed and tilt -mount options are available for 2 to 5.7 inch (50 to 145 mm) OD masts. See reverse for order information. ' Mechanical design is based on environmental conditions as stipulated in EIA -222-F (June 1996) and/or ETS 300 019-1-4 which include the static mechanical load imposed on an antenna by wind at maximum velocity. See the Engineering Section of the catalog for further details. � RoHS _ tea_ 10982-A 0 84010077 650 X-pol Panel Antenna 2496-2690 MHz Horizontal pattern t45°- polarization 0' electrical downtilt Vertical pattern t45°- polarization 0° electrical downtilt Horizontal pattern t45°- polarization 5° electrical downtilt Vertical pattern t45°- polarization 5' electrical downtilt Horizontal pattern t45°- polarization 10° electrical downtilt Vertical pattern t45'- polarization 10' electrical downtilt Kathrein Inc., Scala Division Post Office Box 4580 Medford, OR 97501 (USA) Phone: (541) 779-6500 Fax: (541) 779-3991 Email: communications@kathrein.com Internet: www.kathrein-scala.com �.. DB950G85E-M Decibel' Directed Dipole Antenna .::Al11QREW� Base Station Antennas ■ Exceptional azimuth roll -off reducing soft hand-offs and improving capacity ■: Excellent upper side lobe suppression ■ Deep null filling below the horizon assures improved signal intensity ■ Low profile appearance and low wind loading profile for easier zoning approvals Frequency (MHz) : 1850-1990 Polarization : Vertical Gain (dBd/dBi) : 15.6/17.7 Azimuth BW (Deg.): 85 Elevation BW (Deg.): 6 Beam Tilt (Deg.): 0 Front -To -Back Ratio* (dB) : 40 VSWR : <1.33:1 PIM3 @ 2 x 20w (dBc) : -150 Max. Input Power (Watts) : 250 Impedance (Ohms) : 50 Lightning Protection : DC Ground Weight: 5.2 kg (11.5 Ib) Dimensions (LxWxD) : 1,524 x 76 x 178 mm (60x3x7in) Max. Wind Area: 0.14 m2 0.5 ftZ ) Max. Wind Load (@ 100 mph) : 373.6 N (84 Ibf) Max. Wind Speed: 241 km/h (150 mph) Hardware Material : Galvanized Steel Connector Type : 7-16 DIN - Female (1, Bottom) Color: Light Gray Standard Mounting Hardware : DB390 Standard Downtilt Mounting Hardware: DB5098 WeatherShieldTm Enclosure: AWE-Al2 (Must order separately) Andrew Corporation Fax: 214.631.4706 2601 Telecom Parkway Toll Free Tel: 1.800.676.5342 Richardson, Texas U.S.A 75082-3521 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 Tel: 214.631.0310 www.andrew.com Information correct at date of issue but may be subject to change without notice. Indicates Typical 4/2/2007 dbtech@andrew.com Ah Ah ..... 350 0 10 -- ,Freq: 1920 MHz, Tilt: 0 350 0 10 — Freq: 1920 MHz, Tilt: 0 Andrew Corporation Fax: 214.631.4706 2601 Telecom Parkway Toll Free Tel: 1.800.676.5342 Richardson, Texas U.S.A 75082-3521 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 Tel: 214.631.0310 www.andrew.com Information correct at date of issue but may be subject to change without notice. Indicates Typical 4/2/2007 dbtech@andrew.cor-i DB95OG85E-M Decjbel® , ;.ANDREW6 Directed Dipole Antenna Base Station Antennas AZIMUTH PATTERN ELEVATION PATTERN ..... 350 0 10 -- ,Freq: 1920 MHz, Tilt: 0 350 0 10 — Freq: 1920 MHz, Tilt: 0 Andrew Corporation Fax: 214.631.4706 2601 Telecom Parkway Toll Free Tel: 1.800.676.5342 Richardson, Texas U.S.A 75082-3521 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 Tel: 214.631.0310 www.andrew.com Information correct at date of issue but may be subject to change without notice. Indicates Typical 4/2/2007 dbtech@andrew.cor-i r Ds806E-xT Decibels Omni Antenna ,..; AH�R'W� Base Station Antennas ■ Omnidirectional coverage ■ Rugged, durable construction, heavy duty radome for minimum tip deflection ■ Lightning resistant, with large diameter conductor extending top to bottom ■ Invert mountable Frequency (MHz) : 806-869 Polarization : Vertical Gain (dBd/dBi) : 6/8.1 Azimuth BW (Deg.): 360 Elevation BW (Deg.): 16 Beam Tilt (Deg.): 0 VSWR : <1.5:1 Max. Input Power (Watts) : 500 Impedance (Ohms) : 50 Lightning Protection : DC Ground Weight: - 7.2 kg (16 Ib) Dimensions (LxUO) : 2,438 x 76 mm (96 x 3 in) Max. Wind Area: 0.09 mZ (1 ftp ) Max. Wind Load (@ 100 mph) : 177.9 N (40 Ibo Max. Wind Speed : 362 km/h (225 mph) Hardware Material : Galvanized Steel Connector Type : 7-16 DIN - Female (1, Bottom) Color : Horizon Blue Standard Mounting Hardware: DB365-OS Andrew Corporation Fax: 214.631.4706 ' - Indicates Typical 2601 Telecom Parkway Toll Free Tel: 1.800.676.5342 1/26/2007 Richardson, Texas U.S.A 75082-3521 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 Tel: 214.631.0310 www.andrew.com dbtech@andrew.com Information correct at date of issue but may be subject to change" without notice. Freq: 815 MHz, Tilt: 0 ,An 350 u 10 " Freq: 815 MHz, Tilt: 0 Andrew Corporation Fax: 214.631.4706 ' - Indicates Typical 2601 Telecom Parkway Toll Free Tel: 1.800.676.5342 1/26/2007 Richardson, Texas U.S.A 75082-3521 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 Tel: 214.631.0310 www.andrew.com dbtech@andrew.com Information correct at date of issue but may be subject to change without notice. DB806E-XT Decibel r :N���� Omni Antenna Base Station Antennas AZIMUTH PATTERN ELEVATIONPATTERN Freq: 815 MHz, Tilt: 0 ,An 350 u 10 " Freq: 815 MHz, Tilt: 0 Andrew Corporation Fax: 214.631.4706 ' - Indicates Typical 2601 Telecom Parkway Toll Free Tel: 1.800.676.5342 1/26/2007 Richardson, Texas U.S.A 75082-3521 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 Tel: 214.631.0310 www.andrew.com dbtech@andrew.com Information correct at date of issue but may be subject to change without notice. DB586-XT =.4 A DREW Omni Antenna ■ Light weight, low profile omni, ideal for low to moderate gain applications ■ Integral dual purpose mount allows top or side mounting ■ Lightning resistant, with large diameter conductor extending top to bottom ■ Invert mountable ELECTRICAL Frequency (MHz) : 806-869 Polarization : Vertical Gain (dBd/dBi) : 6/8.1 Azimuth BW (Deg.): 360 Elevation BW (Deg.): 18 Beam Tilt (Deg.): 0 VSWR : <1.5:1 Max. Input Power (Watts) : 500 Impedance (Ohms) : 50 Lightning Protection : DC Ground MECHANICAL Weight: 3.7 kg (8.2 Ib) Dimensions (LxUO) : 1,499 x 38 mm (59 x 1.5 in) Max. Wind Area: .0.05 m2 (0.5 ft2 ) Max. Wind Load (@ 100 mph) : 89.4 N (20.1 Ibf) Max. Wind Speed: 201 km/h (125 mph) Hardware Material : Stainless Steel Connector Type : N - Type Female (1, Bottom) Color: Horizon Blue Standard Mounting Hardware : V -Bolts Andrew Corporation ' Fax: 214.631.4706 2601 Telecom Parkway Toll Free Tel: 1.800.676.5342 Richardson, Texas U.S.A 75082-3521 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 Tel: 214.631.0310 www.andrew.com Information correct at date of issue but may be subject to change without notice. DecibelO Base Station Antennas - Indicates Typical 6/1/2006 dbtech@andrew.o)m cRn 0 in Freq: 815 MHz, Tilt: 0 Andrew Corporation Fax: 214.631.4706 2601 Telecom Parkway Toll Free Tel: 1.800.676.5342 Richardson, Texas U.S.A 75082-3521 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 Tel: 214.631.0310 www.andrew.com Information correct at date of issue but may be subject to change without notice. - Indicates Typical 6/1/2006 dbtech@andrew.com DB586-XT Declbel° t Omni Antenna Base Station Antennas AZIMUTH PATTERN ELEVATIONPATTERN cRn 0 in Freq: 815 MHz, Tilt: 0 Andrew Corporation Fax: 214.631.4706 2601 Telecom Parkway Toll Free Tel: 1.800.676.5342 Richardson, Texas U.S.A 75082-3521 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 Tel: 214.631.0310 www.andrew.com Information correct at date of issue but may be subject to change without notice. - Indicates Typical 6/1/2006 dbtech@andrew.com ML Proposed CN0110 I%W East Elevation The Antenna Company ir wR�INRIN Ad �fif �,� , - I .ti Oe 7!- •�^ ���� �'. i; �.� .r ��' 1` ... °� �- .: d.t i�� � iM��Kje� � a. f � �rrc _ :�s"� __ y s =� _ ��;_ _ �:;:�: -lt t� ��. .,,;�• i. .K.. i,`� . x5 _.�_ . � ., �►'* y� �� '� ,.+�.,.- �: �; ♦�. i ':.4 ' i r r ',� �ri � .. LEAD IN SHEET & COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST FILE NO: MUP08-0002 APN: 007-390-001 APPLICANT: Jason Osborne, Osborne & Associates OWNER: REHKLAU, JOHN P. ENGINEER/AGENT: PROJECT DESCRIPTION & LOCATION: The application requests collocation of six (6) 4.33 -foot panel antennae at the 90 -foot height on an existing 120 -foot self supporting tower and the installation of ground equipment within existing equipment room. The existing tower was built in 1997 under Building Permit 96-1244 and subsequent collocations of antennae were approved via MUP 02-03 (approved on October 30, 2001). MMP 02-03 was exempted from CEQA review. Site is in the C-2 Chico Airport land use compatibility zone. Site is located approximately 500' east of the intersection of Hwy 99 and Eaton Road on the western edge_ of APN 007-390-001, on space #8 of the light industrial court at #3415 Silverbell Road. The applicant has been informed that application is incomplete until site plan conforming to DDS specifications (showing location of tower on parcel) is received. SIZE: 1.2 -acres SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT: 3 EXISTING ZONING: C-2 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: C ASSIGNED PLANNER: Chris Tolley Date Application Received: 12/10/2008 Date Project Assigned: 12/16/2008 Requested IDR Date: 30 Day Complete: Tentative Hearing Date: COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST County Offices and Cities: '®_ Environmental Health El County Counsel ® LAFCo -� ❑ City of Biggs t"® Agricultural'Commissioner ❑ City of Chico ® Public Works/Land Dev ❑ City of Gridley ® Assessor's Office -Mapping ❑ City of Oroville ❑ Planning Division Staff ❑ Town of Paradise ❑ Building Manager ❑ ❑ Fire Protection: ® ealFire i ElEl Medio Fire Protection District Domestic Water: ❑ S.F.W & P. Agency (OWID) ❑ Butte Water District ❑ California Water Service Co. ❑ Thermalito Irrigation District Utilities: ❑ PG&E North & South - Chico ❑ AT & T Irrigation Districi: ❑ Biggs / West Gridley Water ❑ Durham Irrigation Dist. ❑ Richvale Irrigation Dist. ❑ Table Mountain Irrigation Dist. Sewer: ❑ LOAPUD ❑ Sterling City Sewer Main_ ❑ City of Chico (Sewer) ❑ City of Oroville (Sewer) Drainage Districts: ❑ Sacramento & San Joaquin ❑ Drainage District 200 Drainage Dist. BCAG ALUC APCD Butte Co. Farm Bureau Chico Airport Commission Chief Administrative Officer Del Oro Water Co. ■❑ ❑ Paradise Irrigation Dist. ❑ ❑ Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) ❑ SCOR ❑ Reclamation District No. 833 ❑ Reclamation District No. 2054 ❑ Reclamation District No. 2056 ❑ State Agencies: ❑ CalTrans ❑ Dept. of Water Resources ❑ Dept. of Conservation ❑ Federal Agencies: ❑ U.S. Forest Service ❑ U.S. Bureau of Management ❑ USFWS ❑ Army Corp. of Engineers Other Districts, Agencies, Committees: ❑ ❑ ❑ Dept. of Fish & Game El Land ❑ EPA ❑■ ❑■ G:\PROJECTS\Trakit Merge Documents\Drafts\Lead In Sheet & Comment Distribution List.doc Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (53 0) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile www.buffecounty.net/dds www.butteaeneralplan.net ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * PLANNING December 22, 2008 Osborne & Associates C/o Michelle Prado . 701 5th Street Petaluma, CA 94952 Re: Application Incomplete — MUP08-0002 (APN 007-390-001) Dear Osborne & Associates: Thank you for the submittal of the above referenced application. The project application and related items have been reviewed by this office to determine if the application is complete. Your application has been deemed incomplete at this time due to the following: I. Site Plan A site plan, as requested by the Use Permit/Minor Use Permit application, must be submitted before the project is further processed. Please contact this Division if you have any questions about the site plan and necessary contents. The application will be considered complete after the site plan is submitted. We will continue to process your project to the extent possible. If you have any additional questions, please contact me at (530) 538-7603. Sin re , is 01 e Associate Planner Cc. TRK Engineering (delivered via email: mail@trkeng.com) Troester, Steve From: Troester, Steve Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:54 AM To: michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net' Subject: FW: MUP08-0002 Attachments: UsePermit_MinorUP.pdf Michelle, Page 1 of 2 Upon additional review of the materials submitted, I note that there is not Site Plan conforming to the requirements of #8 of the attached MUP application checklist. In particular, the Site Plan must show the location of the existing tower relative to property lines and all other existing structures, and must conform to the criteria of #8 a -t). This application is deemed "incomplete" for processing until a site plan conforming to Butte County specifications, the topo map for the NEIC, and the RF submittals are received. Please call me with any questions. Steve Troester; Senior Planner From: Troester, Steve Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 8:03 AM To: 'Michelle' Subject: RE: MUP08-0002 Michelle, Thanks for the prompt follow-up on the exhibits. You can send the RF tome electronically and a hard copy by mails to us. Regarding the NEIC check, we act as the middlemen, and only forward this check to NEIC for their processing. Your cancelled check will need to serve as your backup. I have attached a scanned copy of the check on the NEIC form for your accountant's reference. Also, the NEIC form must be accompanied by a 7.5' USGS Topo map with the project parcel outlined. Please forward that map on to me electronically, so that I can include it in the submittal to NEIC. Please call me with any questions. Steve Troester, Senior Planner Butte County Department of Development Services #7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA, 95965 (530) 538-7153 (530) 538-2140 FAX From: Michelle [mailto:michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 6:12 PM To: Troester, Steve Subject: MUP08-0002 Hello Steve, Thanks again for taking in my project today. You saved me a very long trip back up there! 12/11/2008 Page 2 of 2 K " I've attached the photo sims, CD's and the coverage map. I know we said to send a disc, but this would be faster if it works. If you still prefer the disc, let.me know and I will send it out tomorrow. Also, I didn't grab a receipt from you on the $75 NEIC fee. Would it possible to send one to me? I also didn't catch what check # I used, and the bookkeeper will loose her mind when she finds out! O I expect the RF letter no later than Monday. I will email it to you as soon as I receive it. Do you need the original? Thanks again, talk to you soon. Michelle Prado Osborne & Associates T: 707.628.9107 michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net 12/11/2008 Tolley, Chris From: Tolley, Chris Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 4:52 PM To: Imichelle.prado@sbcglobal.net' Subject: RE: MUP08-0002, Incomplete for conforming Site Plan Good afternoon Michelle: I am following up on this email send back in December. Have you made any progress in .completing the site plan? Are there any updates regarding the project. Thanks, Chris -----Original Message ----- From: Tolley, Chris Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 1:24 PM To: 'michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net' Subject: RE; MUP08-0002, Incomplete for conforming Site Plan Good morning Michelle: As Steve noted, I was assigned your project and will be responsible for processing it through to the Planning Commission meeting. At this point, we are considering the project incomplete and will not send it out for review until a site plan is received. You can find the "Incomplete Letter" attached. Do you have an idea when the site plan will be ready to submit? Please let me know if you have any questions. -Chris ----Original Message ----- From: michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net [mailto:michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 9:07 AM To: Troester, Steve Cc: Tolley, Chris Subject: Re: MUP08-0002, Incomplete for conforming Site Plan Thank you Steve. Hi Chris, There are issues we are tying with the new plans. Sorry it's causing such a delay, but unfortunately until they're resolved I can't move forward. I understand the application is incomplete. As soon as I am able to, pull new plans, I will bring them out to your office. Thanks, Michelle ------Original Message ------ From: Troester, Steve To: michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net Cc: Tolley, Chris Sent: Dec 18, 2008 8:35 AM Subject: FW: MUP08-0002, Incomplete for conforming Site Plan Michelle, This is just to confirm to you that this application will remain `incomplete" for processing until we receive a Site Plan that shows the location of the existing tower relative to property lines and all other existing structures, conforming to the criteria of #8 a -t of the of the MUP application checklist. Also, I want to let you know that Mr. Chris Tolley of our Division is the planner that has been assigned to oversee this project through to public hearing before the Planning Commission. I am copying him to this message. His phone number is: (530) 538-7603. Please address all subsequent correspondence and communications to him. Thanks! Steve Troester, Senior Planner From: Michelle [mailto:michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 9:38 AM To: Troester, Steve Cc: jason_osborne@sbcglobal.net Subject: RE: MUP0870002 Good Morning Steve, Please find the EMF Study attached for MUP08-2002. I will mail the hard copy out to you when I receive it. I am still waiting on an answer back from the carrier on the revised CD's. I will be in touch as soon as I get more information. Thank you, Michelle Prado Osborne & Associates T: 707.628.9107 michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net From: Troester, Steve [mailto:Stroester@buttecourity.net] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 20059:54 AM • To: michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net Subject: FW: MUP08-0002 Michelle, Upon additional review of the materials submitted, I note that there is not Site Plan conforming to the requirements of #8 of the attached MUP application checklist. In particular, the Site Plan must show the location of the existing tower relative to property lines and all other existing structures, and must conform to .he criteria of #8 a -t). This application is deemed "incomplete" for processing until a site plan conforming to Butte County specifications, the topo map for the NEIC, and the RF submittals are received. Please call me with any guestions. Steve Troester, Senior Planner Sent via B1ackBerry from T -Mobile Tolley, Chris From: Tolley, Chris Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 2:55 PM To: Bonham, Tina; Keiser, Mary Subject: FW: MUP08-0002, Incomplete for conforming Site Plan Attachments: Incomplete letter for MUP08-0002_12 22 08.pdf � oe� Incomplete letter for MUP08-00... Tina and Mary: 0 This project is ready for a project folder, but it does not need to be circulated until we receive a site plan. You can see tie letter attached to this email deeming the project incomplete. Please let me know if you have any questions. -Chris -----Original Message ----- From: Tolley, Chris Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 1:24 PM 'To: 'michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net' Subject: RE: MUP08-0002, Incomplete for conforming Site Plan Good morning Michelle: As Steve noted, I was assigned your project and will be responsible for processing it through to the Planning Commission meeting. ' At this point, we are considering the project incomplete and will not send it out for review until a site plan is received. You can find the "Incomplete Letter" attached. Do you have an idea when the site plan will be ready to submit? Please let me know if you have any questions. -Chris -----Original Message ----- From: michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net [mailto:michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 9:07 AM To: Troester, Steve Cc: Tolley, Chris Subject: Re: MUP08-0002, Incomplete for conforming Site Plan Thank you Steve. Hi Chris, There are issues we are tying with the new plans. Sorry it's causing such a delay, but unfortunately until they're resolved I can't move forward. I understand the application is incomplete. As soon as I am able to pull new plans, I will bring them out to your office. Thanks, Michelle ------Original Message ------ From: Troester, Steve To: michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net Cc: Tolley, Chris Sent: Dec 18, 2008 8:35 AM Subject: FW: MUP08-0002, Incomplete for conforming Site Plan Michelle, This is just to confirm to you that this application will remain `incomplete" for processing until we receive a Site Plan that shows the location of the existing tower relative to property lines and all other existing structures, conforming to the criteria of #8 a -t of the of the MUP application checklist. Also, I want to let you know that Mr. Chris Tolley of our Division is the planner that has been assigned to oversee this project through to public hearing before the Planning Commission. I am copying him to this message. His phone number is: (530) 538-7603. Please address all subsequent correspondence and communications to him. Thanks! Steve Troester, Senior Planner From: Michelle [mailto:michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 9:38 AM To: Troester, Steve Cc: jason_osborne@sbcglobal.net Subject: RE: MUP08-0002 Good Morning Steve, Please find the EMF Study attached for MUP08-2002. I will mail the hard copy out to you when I receive it. I am still waiting on an answer back from the carrier on the revised CD's. I will be in touch as soon as I get more information. Thank you, Michelle Prado Osborne & Associates T: 707.628.9107 michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net From: Troester, Steve [mailto:Stroester@buttecounty.net] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:54 AM To: michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net Subject: FW: MUP08-0002 Michelle, Upon additional review of the materials submitted, I note that there is not Site Plan conP`orming to the requirements of 48 of the attached MUP application checklist. In particular, the Site Plan must show the location of the existing tower relative to property lines and all other existing structures, and must- conform to the criteria of #8 a-t). This application -_s deemed "incomplete" for processing until a site plan conforming to Butte County specifications, the topo map for the NEIC, and the RF submittals are received. Please call me with any questions Steve Troester, Senior Planner Sent via BlackBerry from T -Mobile Page 1 of l Troester, Steve From: Michelle [michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 9:38 AM To: Troester, Steve Cc: jason_osborne@sbcglobal.net Subject: RE: MUP08-0002 Attachments: CN0110 The Antenna Company EMF Study.pdf Good Morning Steve, Please find the EMF Study attached for MUP08-2002. I will mail the hard copy out to you when I receive it. I am still waiting on an answer back from the carrier on the revised CD's. I will be in touch as soon as I get more information. Thank you, Michelle Prado Osborne & Associates T: 707.628.9107 michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net From: Troester, Steve[mailto:Stroester@buttecounty.net] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:54 AM To: michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net Subject: FW: MUP08-0002 Michelle, Upon additional review of the materials submitted, I note that there is not Site Plan conforming to the . requirements of #8 of the attached MUP application checklist. In particular, the Site Plan must show the location of the existing tower relative to property lines and all other existing structures, and must conform to the criteria of - #8 a -t). This application is deemed "incomplete" for processing until a site plan conforming to Butte County specifications, the topo map for the NEIC, and the RF submittals are received. Please call me with any questions. Steve Troester, Senior Planner 12/15/2008 BAE COUNTY RECEIPT 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Department of Development Services Phone (530) 538-7541 Fax (530) 538-2140 Environmental Health Phone (530) 538-7281 Fax (530) 538-2140 Receipt Number: P1293 Date Paid: 12/10/2008. Paid By: Jason Orborne, Osborne & Assoc Received By: SNT Project Number: MUP08-0002 Pay Method: Check 2683 Site Apn: 007-390-001 Description: Co -location on Existing with no CEQA Site Address: 3415 SILVERBELL RD CHICO, CA 95926 Applicant: Jason Orborne, Osborne & Assoc 701 5th St. Petaluma, CA 94952 Printed: 12/10/2608 1:43 pm Fee Description Account Number Fee Amount DP Fish/Game - Negative Dec 1001-0-280-1011460 $1,993.00 ✓ DP Minor Use Permit 0010-440001-4210900-101001 $2,297.80 ✓ DP Publishing/Legal Notices 0010-440001-4210900-101001 $157.40 ✓ DPAG Minor Use Permit 0010-460001-4612200-101001 $73.20 DPCR Record Fee Minor Use Perm 0010-470001-4612319-101001 $50.00 ✓ DPEHLUP Minor Use Permit 0021-540011-4614901-101001 $226.70 DPFPP Minor Use Permit 0100-450001-4617240-101001 $203.00 DPLD Minor Use Permit 00 10-440004-4611700- 1 0 1001 $100.00 Total Fees Paid: Michelle Prado Site Acquisition Specialist Osborne &. Associates Cell 707-628-9107 Fax 415-358-5766 michelle.prado@sbcglobal.net www.osbome-associates.net $5,101.10 • COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND T REASURI_R'S RECEIPT . OROVILLE, CA ATR NO :. 1492 RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BAG 425 :.. DATE 121/112008 FUND FUND. DEPT ACCT CASA DESCRIPTION INV# TITLE -,CODE CODE ODE CODE AMOLWT. DEPOSI'T DATE: 1211 RECEIPTS: P1293 RECEIVED ON: 12i9Gf PLANNING APPL. FEES GENL 0010 440MI 42iOBW901001 2,��i.20 LAND DEVELOPMENT GENL - 0010 44 -4611700 1010.01. 190.00 ENVIRONMEWAL HLTH PN FUND 0021. 540011 •46449 1 1011 226.70 AGRICULTURAL FEES GENL.W10 46MI 4612200 101001 73.E FIRE iaLI+1G APPIa: ISE:._......:. , FtI �,P ®7 ... 1 4 `17240 1 010Q1 2,03.00 NODIi OE CLERK'S FILING FEE GENL 0010 47 1 ' 4612319 "101WI 50.00 ) .PFoiect NumberAmount ®f F�� MUP08- 0002, .08806 E. JASON, OSBORNE & ASSOClAi2--�; � ? 0:00 APN 007-380-00? FISH & GAME: FEES CLERKJRECORE) 1001 2.80 101160 ( 11250) Project NunberArret'unt-of-Fey -, IMUP08-0002; 0S90PNE,_kA-SON.,0Sr8QRNE_ .. SSQClI�jj a�- $ 9;093.00 APN 007-390401 TOTAL 59101,10 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER vuhite=treasumr p;nk--auditor ctnaay='r9epositar golden'rod=file Y f 1 IkV.���;i'�;;��,,��' �,� _ "moi •,.°�ti'� f� � C� � " � l MR .,,�' rJ � aQ ice: ~ �.��'�`s� �,9 s� t� � "'�-` �•,� �'�'► + y"�'�` 1a �Yl! � T' ,� �; •"(y�i f�ti • ��� 111 � � 4 j � ` - � J! �v1r��� .41 i 0 i DPA -NG INDEX REV. DWG. NO. DESCRIPTION NO. A Z-1 COVER SHEET A Z-2 PARTIAL SITE PLAN A Z-5 EQUIPMENT ROOM LAYOUT A Z-4 NORTH ELEVATION at ti� P I� �� EATON' RD QpO� P4 p �P ti at&E Your world. Delivered. COMPANY CNOIIO DIRECTIONS FROM AT4T PLEASANTON OFFICE: DEPART ATBT OFFICE ON ROSEWOOD OR (EAST). TURN RIGHT (NORTHWEST) ONTO OWEN5 DR. TURN RIGHT (NORHTEAST) ONTO HACIENDA DR. TAKE RAMP (RIGHT) ONTO I-550 (ARTHUR H BREED FWY) FOR !.7 MI TOWARDS OAKLAND. TURN RIGHT ONTO RAMP TOWARDS 5ACRAMENTO/5AN JOSE. TAKE RAMP (RIGHT) ONTO 1-680 (SINCLAIR FWY) FOR 40.9 MI TOWARDS SACRAMENTO. TAKE RAMP (RIGHT) ONTO 1-50 FOR 15.2 MI TOW.,1,RD5 SACRAMENTO. TURN RIGHT ONTO RAMP TOWARDS WINTER5/REDDIN6. TAKE RAMP (LEFT) ONTO 1-505 FOR 34.1 MI. MERGE ONTO 1-5 FOR 65.4 MI. AT EXIT 619, TURN RIGHT ONTO RAMP TOWARDS GA-32/CHICO. TURN RIGHT (EAST) ONTO 5R-32 (NEWVILLE RD). TURN RIGHT (SOUTH) ONTO 1-5 51.5 (SR -32), THEN IMMEDIATELY TURN LEFT (EAST) ONTO SR -32 (WALKER 5T) FOR 1'1.1 MI. TURN LEFT (NORTH) ONTO W EAST AVE FOR 2.0 MI. TAKE -RAMP (LEFT) ONTO SR-gg FOR 1.1 MI TOWARDS GA -g9. TURN RIGHT ONTO RAMP TOV4<.RD5 EATON RD. TURN RIGHT (NORTHEAST) ONTO EATON RD. TURN RIGHT (SOUTH) ONTO 51LVER5ELL RD. ARRIVE AT 3415 51LVERBELL RD, CHICO, CA. PROJECT ADDRESS: 3415 SILVERBELL RD CHI CO, GA 959'13 APN: 3q° 005"-001-00,- spa ce 8 7 - DESCRIPTION OF WORK: THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE INSTALLATION OF (6) 4'-4" PANEL ANTENNAS ON AN EXISTING 120'-O"± SELF SUPPORT TOWER AND THE INSTALLATION OF (3) INDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS IN51DE AN EXISTING GROUND FLOOR EQUIPMENT ROOM. APPLICANT: ATBT 4430 ROSEWOOD DRIVE, BLDG 3 PLEASANTON, GA 8455& PROPERTY OWNER: T.B.D. CODE INFORMATION: ZONING CLASSIFICATION PROPOSED USE: BUILDING CODE: ELECTRICAL CODE: OCCUPANCY GROUP: CONSTRUCTION TYPE: PROJECT AREA: STRUCTURE HEIGHT: a GG TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY 2007 CAL!PORNIA BUILDING CODE 2007 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE U COMBUSTIBLE *56 50. FT 120'-O"± A.S.L. (T.O. SELF SUPPORT TOWER) PROJECT ENGINEER: TRK ENGINEERING LTD. #201 - 17688 66TH AVE SURREY, BG V35 7XI, CANADA CONTACT: RICK PARSONS TEL: (604) 574-6432 FAX: (604) 574-6431 TOLL FREE: 1-577-345-4045 EMAIL: mailgtrkeng.com WEB: www.trkeng.com SURVEYOR: N/A CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: GOODMAN NETWORKS CONTACT: KEITH YORK PHONE: (214) 862-7877 SITE DEVELOPMENT: 05BORNE E ASSOCIATES 701 5TH STREET PETALUMA, GA 94952 CONTACT: JASON 0550PNE PHONE: (415) 559-2121 ZONING CONTACT: 05BORNE 8 ASSOCIATES 701 5TH STREET PETALUMA, GA 94952 CONTACT:JA50N OSBORNE PHONE: (415) 559-2121 JURISDICTION: CITY OF CHICO ACCESSIBILITY: INSTALLATION 15 UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION / PUBLIC ACCESS. A.D.A. ACCESSIBILITY 15 NOT REQUIRED. APPROVAL LIST TITLE SIGNATURE DATE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER SITE ACOU151TION ZONING MANAGER RF MANAGER OWNER �001 Vff—NN—GINEERING 0201 - 11656 66TH AVE SURREY, BC V55 TXI, CANADA TEL: (604) 5'14-6432 FAX: (604) 514-6451 TOLL FREE: I-511-545-4045 EMAIL: moil®trkeng.com WEB: www.trkeng.com PROJECT NO: 0554-014 DRAWN BY: A.F. CHECKED BY: P.A. FEE-0554-014ZI I SUBMITTALS I IAl OCT 91/081 IS -4E0 FOR REVIEW TIE 1160RMATON CONTAINED IN -15 SET OF OOOJF¢M5 15 R '!!T— BY NATVRE. ANY VSE OR VISCLOSLIRE OTFER TNAN THAT —CH RELATES TO TIE CLIENT NANEO IS STRICTLY F IDITEO. AIESEAL BUTTE COUNTY DEC 10 2008 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SITE – THE ANTENNA COMPANY GNO110 5415 51LVERBELL RD CHICO, GA 959-13 5 T TITLE COVER SHEET SHEET N R Z-1 j� /t� f 1! TRUE NORTH ARROW 5HOPW ON THIS DRAWING IS APPROXIMATE ONLY AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR /IDE ANTENNA GABLE PER TO MATCH EXISTING ROVTING OF AT6T ANTENNA ------------- I EXI5TIN6 ASPHALT PARKING LOT `EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB EXISTING b' -O" HIGH `GHAINLINK FENCE CIN BARBED WIRE TOP EX15TIN6 120'-O°z SELF SUPPORT TOWER. ANTENNAS NOT 5HONW FOR CLARITY. REFER TO DETAIL 2 FOR ATIT ANTENNA LAYOUT 1 EXISTING EQUIPMENT (ROOM. REFER TO Z-3 FOR EQUIPMENT ROOM LAYOUT I EXISTING MAN GATE EXISTING BUILDING /_-- -- / j� / // / ------------------- -7 _OM ACCESS DOOR ,( II II II II KT'� PARTIAL 51TE PLAN O 1' 2' 4' SECTOR G AZI?- T 200• SBCTOR ATI T 4'-4" PANEL ANTENNA, iYP. OF 12 (4 PER SECTOR) EXISTING 120'-O°z SELF SUPPORT TOWER 0 R SECTOR A 1T AZIMUTH 80° 2 AT$ T ANTENNA LAYOUT O 1' 2' 4' PALMTREE\\IIIyII III��I� sat&t' ROUTE (24) AT6T 1 1/4" ANTENNA GABLES '. ENGINEERING THROUGH EXI5TING WALL USING (1) EXI5TIN6 -201 - 11688 66TH AVE 8 -PORT ANTENNA GABLE ENTRY PANEL PLUS (1) SURREY, BC V35 1XI, CANADA 16 -PORT ANTENNA GABLE ENTRY PANEL (ABOVE) TEL (604) 5'14-6432 EXISTING ANTENNA FAX: (604) 514-6431 \\\\V GABLE ENTRY PANEL � t� TOLL FREE: 1-811-545-4045 ------------- I EXI5TIN6 ASPHALT PARKING LOT `EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB EXISTING b' -O" HIGH `GHAINLINK FENCE CIN BARBED WIRE TOP EX15TIN6 120'-O°z SELF SUPPORT TOWER. ANTENNAS NOT 5HONW FOR CLARITY. REFER TO DETAIL 2 FOR ATIT ANTENNA LAYOUT 1 EXISTING EQUIPMENT (ROOM. REFER TO Z-3 FOR EQUIPMENT ROOM LAYOUT I EXISTING MAN GATE EXISTING BUILDING /_-- -- / j� / // / ------------------- -7 _OM ACCESS DOOR ,( II II II II KT'� PARTIAL 51TE PLAN O 1' 2' 4' SECTOR G AZI?- T 200• SBCTOR ATI T 4'-4" PANEL ANTENNA, iYP. OF 12 (4 PER SECTOR) EXISTING 120'-O°z SELF SUPPORT TOWER 0 R SECTOR A 1T AZIMUTH 80° 2 AT$ T ANTENNA LAYOUT O 1' 2' 4' .lECT NO: 0854-014 FR AyN BY: A.F. GH GKED BY: P.A. GA D FILE: 0854-014Z2 SUBMIITAL5 I A I OGT 51/05 1 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 1 TIE It80RMAnoN —Al— IN THIS SET OP DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSRE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES To Tiff CLIEM NAMED 19 STWCTLY PROHIBITED. ArE SEAL StTe THE ANTENNA COMPANY ON0110 5415 SILVERBELL RD CHICO, GA 959'13 SHEET TILE PARTIAL 51TE PLAN SHEET NUMBER r r7 e% sat&t' '. ENGINEERING -201 - 11688 66TH AVE SURREY, BC V35 1XI, CANADA TEL (604) 5'14-6432 FAX: (604) 514-6431 TOLL FREE: 1-811-545-4045 EMAIL: mallotrkeng.com WEB: www.trkeng.com .lECT NO: 0854-014 FR AyN BY: A.F. GH GKED BY: P.A. GA D FILE: 0854-014Z2 SUBMIITAL5 I A I OGT 51/05 1 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 1 TIE It80RMAnoN —Al— IN THIS SET OP DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSRE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES To Tiff CLIEM NAMED 19 STWCTLY PROHIBITED. ArE SEAL StTe THE ANTENNA COMPANY ON0110 5415 SILVERBELL RD CHICO, GA 959'13 SHEET TILE PARTIAL 51TE PLAN SHEET NUMBER r r7 e% 1 I j I I 1 I � I � I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 II Lf � 1 L p I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I , L I I AT&T 13•_2°x4'_3° LEASE AREA (56 SQ. FTJ V7 1 I AT&T 2'-b"x4'-O" PLYWOOD TELCO BOARD PAINTED &RAY TRUE NORTH ARROW SHOWN ON THIS AT&T ELECTRICAL EOUIPMENT. REFER TO DRAWING15 APPROXIMATE ONLY AND ELECTRICAL DRAWIN65 FOR DETAILS MUST BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR EXISTING GLEARWIRE ATCT 2' -3"x5' -O° PLYWOOD POW'ERBOARD PAINTED &RAYS 1 I j I I 1 I � I � I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 II Lf � 1 L p I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I , L I I AT&T 13•_2°x4'_3° LEASE AREA (56 SQ. FTJ f 4. I ATCT RBS 3206 UMTS EQUIPMENT CABINET (4411be) AT&T E911 & M15G. RACK AT&T BATTERY RACK (2,0901{»). Im_2" 0` I` TYP. I I i I I CONCRETE` AT&T RBS 22 GSM EXISTING __EQUIPMENT PAD 1 v�� I ,-GUIPMENT CABINET (501165)BATHROOM _------------- .T ------I1 E- J _�T_______- AT&T GABLE LADDER I (ABOVE) FOR ROUTING OF I 1 (24) 1 114° ANTENNA GABLES I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I i I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I ------------------------ I i r EXISTING PANELBOARD EXISTING FIVAG UNIT 1___________ _____________________._____________-_________________--_ I I I I I I I I � I � � - ----=-------- ---------- EXISTING ANTENNA 1 I i j i EXISTING GABLE GABLE ENTRY PANEL i I LADDER (ABOVE) 1111 I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 i 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I' EXISTING WOOD I , EXISTING METRO PGS EXI5TTELCO BACKBOARDGHAINLINK FENCE ILIT" I I 6YIGTIAIf. 6YYTF1I 1 I i � EXISTING METRO PGS EQUIPMENT CABINET , - 1 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT I I I I 1 EXISTING METRO PGS 1 i EXISTING WOOD SHELF EQUIPMENT CABINET, TYP. OF 2 EXISTING PANELBOARD . � I I I I I I I I I I I�EQUIPMENT ROOM LAYOUT O 1' 2' 4' NJ 100TA r ENGINEERING -201 - 11666 66TH AVE SURREY, BG V35 1XI, CANADA TEL. (604) 514-6432 FAX: (604) 514-6431 TOLL FREE: I-bll-345-4045 EMAIL:.0110trk—j.Lom WEB: _.Vkcngz m PROJECT NO: 0554-014 DRAWN BY: A.F. CHECKED BY: P.A. GAD FILE: OH54-014Z3 SUBMITTALS AlOGT 91/08 1 ISSIP� FOR RMEA TIE INFORMATION LONTAINED IN -15 SET OF DOLUMENTS IS PRORt1ETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR D19LI.OSURE OTIER TNAN TWIT RELAcN y TER TO TIE LLIENT NAMED 19 STRILTLY PRp1IBITED. ASE SEAL THE ANTENNA COMPANY GNOI I O 9416 61L1/GRgraLL RZ) CHICO, CA 959'13 'MEET TITLE EQUIPMENT ROOM LAYOUT 5NEET MA•iBER Z-3 1 I 1 1 EXISTING GLEARWIRE EQUIPMENT CABINET ' 1 1 I EXI5TIN& PAINTED 1 , I I EQUIPMENT BOUNDARY I I I I I EXISTING GABLE 1 - - i i LADDER (ABOVE) I 1 I/ I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I ' I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 ' ROUTE (24) AT&T 1 1/4° ANTENNA GABLES THROUGH EXISTING WALL U51N6 (1) EXISTING D -PORT ANTENNA GABLE ENTRY PANEL PLUS (1) I 1 I6 -PORT ANTENNA GABLE ENTRY PANEL (ABOVE) I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I f 4. I ATCT RBS 3206 UMTS EQUIPMENT CABINET (4411be) AT&T E911 & M15G. RACK AT&T BATTERY RACK (2,0901{»). Im_2" 0` I` TYP. I I i I I CONCRETE` AT&T RBS 22 GSM EXISTING __EQUIPMENT PAD 1 v�� I ,-GUIPMENT CABINET (501165)BATHROOM _------------- .T ------I1 E- J _�T_______- AT&T GABLE LADDER I (ABOVE) FOR ROUTING OF I 1 (24) 1 114° ANTENNA GABLES I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I i I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I ------------------------ I i r EXISTING PANELBOARD EXISTING FIVAG UNIT 1___________ _____________________._____________-_________________--_ I I I I I I I I � I � � - ----=-------- ---------- EXISTING ANTENNA 1 I i j i EXISTING GABLE GABLE ENTRY PANEL i I LADDER (ABOVE) 1111 I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 i 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I' EXISTING WOOD I , EXISTING METRO PGS EXI5TTELCO BACKBOARDGHAINLINK FENCE ILIT" I I 6YIGTIAIf. 6YYTF1I 1 I i � EXISTING METRO PGS EQUIPMENT CABINET , - 1 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT I I I I 1 EXISTING METRO PGS 1 i EXISTING WOOD SHELF EQUIPMENT CABINET, TYP. OF 2 EXISTING PANELBOARD . � I I I I I I I I I I I�EQUIPMENT ROOM LAYOUT O 1' 2' 4' NJ 100TA r ENGINEERING -201 - 11666 66TH AVE SURREY, BG V35 1XI, CANADA TEL. (604) 514-6432 FAX: (604) 514-6431 TOLL FREE: I-bll-345-4045 EMAIL:.0110trk—j.Lom WEB: _.Vkcngz m PROJECT NO: 0554-014 DRAWN BY: A.F. CHECKED BY: P.A. GAD FILE: OH54-014Z3 SUBMITTALS AlOGT 91/08 1 ISSIP� FOR RMEA TIE INFORMATION LONTAINED IN -15 SET OF DOLUMENTS IS PRORt1ETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR D19LI.OSURE OTIER TNAN TWIT RELAcN y TER TO TIE LLIENT NAMED 19 STRILTLY PRp1IBITED. ASE SEAL THE ANTENNA COMPANY GNOI I O 9416 61L1/GRgraLL RZ) CHICO, CA 959'13 'MEET TITLE EQUIPMENT ROOM LAYOUT 5NEET MA•iBER Z-3 8 EXISTING CLEAHIRE PA ANTENNA, TYP. OF 5 EXISTING MIGROHAVE_ DISH, TYP. EXISTING MICROWAVE DISH, TYP. EXISTING METRO PGS , PANEL ANTENNA, TYP. OF: EXISTING OMNI ANTENNA, TYP. I I AT&T 4'-4" PANEL ANTE TYP. OF 12 (4 PER SECTOR ) f PROVIDE ANTENNA GAEL LADDER TO MATCH EXISTING FOR ROUTIN6 0 AT&T ANTENNA GABLES ANTENNAS a NEL @II LI O iT J T.O. EXISTING SELF SUPPORT TOl^L=R 120'-0"- A.G.L. I O EXI5TIN6 METRO PG5 RAD CENTER I. LL , ✓ I B I sj 115'-0"1 A.6.L. ti I tl 6 SCI EXISTING ANTENNA BOOM "e " IE IIL w�i—v=v= 95'_0 A.G.L. . ` IIUNIILN I 11 t "Y AT&T ANTENNA RAD CENTER NNI B .0 90'-O"! A.6.L. ) i P I II ( EXISTING ANTENNA BOOM t 1 l 8'-O"' A.G. E I I F TO • I EXISTING ANTENNA-/� GABLE LADDER EXISTING 120'-O"= SELF�l SUPPORT TOVER EXISTING MICROWAVE DISH r EXISTING BUILDING ❑ FloR t NORTH ELEVATION O 4' H' Ib' )UTE (24) AT&T 11/4" ANTENNA ,BLES THROWN EXISTING WALL U51N6 EX15TIN6 H -PORT ANTENNA GABLE TRY PANEL PLU5 (1) 16 -PORT TENNA GABLE ENTRY PANEL GRADE O'-0" NOTE5: I. ELEVATION 15 DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY, ENGINEERING -201 - 11665 66TH AVE SURREY, BG V55 1XI, CANADA TEL: (604) 514-6432 FAX: (604) 514-6451 TOLL FREE: 1-811-345-4045 EMAIL: moll®trker�.4= WEB: W W W.trkeny.com PROJECT NO: 0854-014 DRAWN BY: A.F. CHECKED BY: P.A. GAD FILE: 0854-014Z4 5UBMITTALS A OGT 31/00 1 ISSUED FOR REVIEW .TIE INFORMATION —AI— IN -15SET OF ocGc M5 15 PROPRIETARY B NATURE. AAY LSE OR D15U.0SJRE 0T1ER TNAN THAT -1cm RELATES TO THE CLINA1W 15 STRICTLY PROHIBITED. SITE THE ANTENNA COMPANY (CNOI I O) s 416 GILT!5R95LL RP CHICO, CA 95915 ET TITLE NORTH ELEVATION SHEET . ER Z®4 ASE SFJLL SITE THE ANTENNA COMPANY (CNOI I O) s 416 GILT!5R95LL RP CHICO, CA 95915 ET TITLE NORTH ELEVATION SHEET . ER Z®4