Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMUP 10-0001RF: CN0890A NSB - Building Permit B11-1396 -Need Planning Department Approval-... Page 3 of 4 Just wanted you to know I haven't forgotten this requirement/need for a bond. I am working on it. OGG I Frank Schabarum �j I — 3 �o Wireless Site Development Specialist , 10615 Quail Hollow Lane F 7- 5 f l� Redding, CA 96003 Office Phone: 530-722-0743 �e WV -0 'tJ Mobile Phone: 619-743-0309 9-'�-� Y frank. schabarum@sbcglobaL.net --- On Wed, 10/26/11, Michelena; Mark <MMichelena@buttounty.net> wrote: From: Michelena, Mark <MMichelena@buttecounty.net> Subject: B11-1396 To: "Frank Schabarum" <frank.schabarum@sbcglobal.net> Cc: " Thistlethwaite, Charles".<CThistlethwaite@buttecounty.net> Date: Wednesday, October 26, 2011, 10:39 AM Good Morning Frank, I was reviewing the above building permit for Planning and needed to let you know about one of the conditions of approval of MU—P-T 0.0Ek 0.00t- 11. Prior to issuance of the building permit,. the applicant shall. post Uerformance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by. a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is requited to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary.to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may. lead to permit gevocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. The amount we currently charger for our one-time test performance security is $2,500.00. Let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mark Michelena Senior Planner, Planning Division Butte County Department of Development Services http://Us.mc832.mail.yahoo.com/mclshowMessage?sN id=6&fid=%2540S%254OSearch... 11/28/2011 • BOND OF PERFORMANCE Bond No. 09023060 • KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC of 4430 Rosewood Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588 as Principal (hereinafter called Principal), and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland with its Home Office in the City of Schaumburg, Illinois, as Surety (hereinafter called Surety), are held and firmly bound onto of By County, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965, as Obligee, in the full and just sum of Two Thousand Five Hundred and NO/100 Dollars ($2,500.00), lawful money of the United States of America, to be paid to the said Obligee, successors or assigns; for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS the Principal has entered, or is about to enter, into an Agreement with the Obligee to collocate on an existing wireless communications tower at site CN0890A — LAC located at 3415 Silverbelle Road, Chico, CA and is required to post performance guarantee to ensure the submission of a Radio Frequency Report as is more specifically set forth in said Agreement, to which reference is hereby made. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if the Principal shall well and truly perform and carry out the terms and conditions of said Agreement, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED FURTHER, that this bond will expire January 13, 2012 unless released by the Obligee or cancelled by the Surety prior to this date. The Surety may terminate its liability hereunder as to future acts of the Principal at any time by giving thirty (30) days written notice of such termination to the Obligee. Sealed with our seals and dated this 13th day of January, 2011. - (4 t Z W-1) Witness c Witness New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC , 1I 1A Sherri L. Bazan Principal Assistant Treasurer Fidelity and Depo�'sintJpCompa y Wfaryland, Vl . e.• •'� Y. y /8Zkil l 9 A. Notheisen, Attorney W t v� ~ SE 1 3 A 1 _y �.. �_ �., �apriAho �•� �• �. •n..46 .e ' • 0 ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY SURETY STATE , Y OF Missouri City of' St. Louis } ss' On this appeared 13th day of January Heidi A. Notheisen 2011 , before me personaliv ]cnowu to me to be the Attorney -in -Fact (j-' Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland the corporation taut executed the within instrument, and ackno%vlcdgcd to me dial such corporation executed the same. IN \VI'1'NESS �A�HI:RF.01 , I have hereunto scI my hand and allixcd my ollicial seal, at my ollice in the aforesaid County, dic day and year in this certilicatc first above Nvriitcn. My Commission Expires: 01/18/2013 (Seal) SANDRA L. HAM Notary Public -Notary Seal STATE OF MISSOURI St. Louis County My Commission' Expires on lan.18, 2013 . Commssion #09450177 S-0230/GEEF 2/98 Sandra L. Ham Notary Public in the State ol' Missouri County 01'St. Louis Power of Attorney FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation of the State of Maryland, by WILLIAM J. MILLS, Vice President, and GERALD F. HALEY, Assistant Secretary, in pursuance of authority granted by Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said ny, which are set forth on the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full force and effect on the dak ereby nominate, constitute and appoint Pamela A. BEELMAN, Cynthia L. CHOREN E nn R. FRANK, Karen L. ROIDER, Debra C. SCHNEIDER and Sandra L. HA is ue and lawful agent and Attorney -in -Fact, to make, execute, seal and del' o s e c° as its act and deed: any and all bonds and undertakings, and the execqut' s or e ance of these presents, shall be as binding upon said Company, as!VOI, o a ses, as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by t f e y at its office in Baltimore, Md., in their own proper persons. This power of attor es �of Pamela A. BEELMAN, Cynthia L. HANAK, Heidi A. NOTHEISEN, JoAnn R. FRANK,��I ebra C. SCHNEIDER, Sandra L. HAM, dated December 12, 2007. The said Assistant r does hereby certify that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Company, and is now in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice -President and Assistant Secretary have hereunto subscribed their names and affixed the Corporate Seal of the said FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this 3rd day of Decem:)er, A.D. 2009. ATTEST: 'gyp Uposi Im State of Maryland City of Baltimore ss: FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND Gerald F. Haley Assistant Secretary By: William J. Mills Vice President On this 3rd day of December, A.D. 2009, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, c.uly commissipnp4l�md qualified, came WILLIAM J. MILLS, Vice President, and GERALD F. HALEY, Assistant Secretar4 of t ie FIDtol � D DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers r- etc ''` ;who executed the preceding instrument, and they each acknowledged the execution of the same, and be-ing m', d raw 1, severally and each for himself deposeth and saith, that they are the said officers of the Company aforesaid, a � � . 1` �ffixed t the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company,and that the said Corporate Seal +i,d � t �� � a o p g rp P and tiprig`nfures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above written. ni. ./ til, l•'� �.. �JJ� Constance A. Dunn Notary Pudic My Commission Expires: July 14, 2011 POA -F 079-0626 • EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND "Article VI, Section 2. The Chairman of the Board, or the President, or any Executive Vice -President, or any of the Se,:lior Vice -Presidents or Vice -Presidents specially authorized so to do by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, shall have power, by and with the concurrence of the Secretary or any one of the Assistant Secretaries, to appoint Resident Vice -Presidents, Assistant Vice -Presidents and Attorneys -in -Fact as the business of the Company may require, or to authorize any person or persons to execute on behalf of the Company any bonds, undertaking, recognizances, stipulations, policies, contracts, agreements, deeds, and releases and assignments of judgements, decrees, mortgages and instrument: in the nature of mortgages,... and to affix the seal of the -Company thereto." CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND•DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney is still in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that the Vice -President who executed the said Power of Attorney was one of the additional Vice -Presidents specially authorized by the Board of Directors to appoint any Attorney -in -Fact as provided in Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND. This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of tte Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held en the 10th day of May, 1990. RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced seal of the company and facsimile or mechanical) reproduced signature of any Vice -President, Secretary, or Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed." IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said Company, this 13th day of Janua 2011 X) Assistant Secretary EXHIBIT A MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION N�iT�" 2OIO DATE: ' MUP10-0001 PERMIT NO. 007-390-001 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: AT&T Mobility is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with application filed to collocate on an existing 120 -foot communication tower and occupying a 240 square foot lease area within an existing building for the ground, equipment. The project consists of: • Mounting of up to three (3) antenna sectors with up to four (4) antennas per sector and two (2), 2 -foot diameter microwave dishes below the panel antennas. - The panel antennas will be centered at the 85 -foot level. - The microwave dishes will be centered at the 80 -foot level. • Installation of coax lines and supporting equipment next to the antenna and interior space within the existing building for ground equipment. • One (1) 12 'x 20' equipment area (240 square feet) within the existing building. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of this Minor Use Permit constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-41. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Minor Use Permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this Minor Use Permit must be established within 12 months of the delivery of the countersigned permit to the Permittee. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid, and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of receipt of the countersigned permit by the Permittee, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. Pagel of 4 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. Conditions of Approval: Planning Division 1. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Attachment E", and is incorporated herein by this reference. 2. The new antennas and mounting hardware shall be painted to match the existing neutral color of the proposed communications tower. 3. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division that all associated towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the California Building Code. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 5. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 6. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 7. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 8. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 10. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65. Page 2 of 4 11. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of removal. 13. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 14. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65: The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division no later than January 31 of each year. 15. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 16. The collocation of the antennas allowed by this Minor Use Permit requires the issuance of a building permit from the Butte County Building Division. The Building Division, based upon engineered calculations submitted by the applicant, may determine that the tower cannot physically support the requested number of antennas. If that is the case, the number of new antennas allowed on the tower may be less than the number of antennas permitted by this Minor Use Permit. Processing Fees 17. Prior to issuance of the Minor Use Permit, pay any outstanding project -related processing fees. County Counsel 18. If this entire matter or any finding, action or condition of this matter is appealed to the Board of Supervisors,. the applicant or any other developer/operator other than the applicant agrees to indemnify the County of Butte from liability or loss related to the approval of this project and agrees to sign an indemnification agreement in a form approved by County Counsel before the Board's appeal hearing. If the application is not appealed, this condition is deemed satisfied. Page 3 of 4 0 0 I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this Minor Use Permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Date: / 0 NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Division permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. PC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Division Butte County Fire Department/CDF Assessors Office Page 4 of 4 ' I Clerk -Recorder's Department County of Butte County Clerk -Recorder I FISH AND WHE M RKS FEE 5b. bb ------------- ----------------------- TOTAL �• i ----------------------------------------- ruUKrlAI 5b.6® CyAMI;i , d.0d 12iN�/2Nib 1:NJpN �blbl�b�b6b58 KL ECR-REC88 i ltiank You Have a Nice Day! ---------------------------------------- Requested Hy: H.C. Development Services State of California—The Resources Agency ' DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND 171E CEIPT# 2010 ENVIRONMENTALVI-I(�ING FEE CASH RECEIPT.1401227 STATE CLEARING HOUSE # (Ifapplicable) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE. TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY P OJ f 11 I oir0C r �GOvA. STATE QL ZIPCODE ,(u L �4 PROJECT LICANT (Check appropriate box): LI Local Public Agency LJ School District L] Other Special District Ll State Agency )� Private Entity CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: ❑ Environmental Impact Report (EIR) .$2,792.25 $ ❑ Mitigated/Negative Declaration (ND)(MND) $2,010.25 $ ❑ Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) $850.00 $ ❑ Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs (CRP) $949.50 $ County Administrative Fee $50.00 $ Project that is exempt from fees ❑ Notice of Exemption ❑ DFG No Effect Determination (Form Attached) Other $ PAYMENT METHOD: if❑ I ❑ Cash ❑ Credit ❑ Check 4 Other J 1� �� TOTALRECEIVED $ • �� WHITE -PROJECT A�LICANT YELLOW -DFG/ASB PINK-LEADAGENCY GOLDENROD -COUNTY CLERK FG 753.5a (Rev. 11 /09) R State of California—The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND�ME '2010 ENVIRONMENTAL',.�,Al' ----7-7----_-_777'_ G FEE CASH RECEIPT CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: ❑ Environmental Impact Report (EIR) ❑ Mitigated/Negative Declaration (ND)(MND) ❑ Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) ❑ Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs (CRP) °® County Administrative Fee ❑ Project that is exempt from fees ❑ Notice of Exemption ❑ DFG No Effect Determination (Form Attached) ❑ Other ,. PAYMENT METHOD: ❑ Cash ❑ Credit ❑ Check Other �) WHITE - PROJECT YELLOW-DFG/ASB PINK-LEADAGENCY rel �Ec # 401227 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE #(Ifappli-ble) $2,792.25 $ $2,010.25 $ $850.00 $ $949.50 $ $50.00 $ SQ, TOTALRECEIVED $' TITLE Clerk -�Q.( o GOLDENROD -COUNTY CLERK FG 753.5a (Rev. 11/09) I NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO: ® Butte County Clerk ❑ Office of Planning and Research 25 County Center Drive PO Box 3044 or 1400 Tenth Street Oroville, CA 95965 Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 Sacramento, CA 95814 FROM: Butte County Department of Development Services, Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the PRC. AP Number: 007-390-001 Project Title: MUP10-0001, MINOR USE PERMIT Applicant: AT&T Mobility c/o Frank Schabarum — 10615 Quail Hollow Lane, Redding, CA 96003 Contact Person: Mark"Michelena Telephone Number: 538-7376 1. Project Description/Location: This project is a Minor Use Permit to collocate on an existing 120 -foot communication tower and occupying a 1,725 square foot lease, including a 240 square foot area for the ground equipment in an existing building. The project site is located at 3415 Silverbell Road, approximately 500 feet south of Eaton Road, Chico. This is to advise that the Butte County Planning Commission/ (Lead Agency) has approved the above-described project on November 18, 2010 and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project: The project ❑will, ® will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. ❑An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. ®A. Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures ❑were, ®were not, made a condition of the approval of the -project. 4. A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan ❑was, ®was not, adopted for this project. 5. A _statement of overriding considerations ❑was, ®was not, adopted for this project. 6. Findings ®were, ❑were not, made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the Negative Declaration is available to the general public at: 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965. N 0 L E 0. DEC -22010 CAN DACE J,GRUBBS, BUTTE C0: CLERK Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 kfis Thistlethwaite Date Division Manager Department of Development Services *UTTE COUNTY RECEV Printed: 11/30/2010 *RECEIPT NUMBER PREFIXES* 2:42 pm B/P = Development Services - Building/Planning Division (530)538-7601 EH = Environmental Health (530)538-7281 PW = Public Works Department (530)538-7681 Receipt Number: P1801 Date Paid: 9/2/2010 Paid By: Black Dot Wireless LLC Received By: MEM Project Number: MUP10-0001 Pay Method: CHECK 005389 Site Apn: 007-390-001 Description: Collocation Site Address: 3415 SILVERBELL RD CHICO, CA 95926 Applicant: AT&T Mobility c/o Frank Scharb Fee Description Account Number Fee Amount DP Fish/Game - Negative Dec 10 1001-0-280-1011460 $2,010.25 DP GPMF General Plan Maint Fee 0010-440001-4610311-10113311 $102.69 DP Minor Use Permit 09 ✓ 0010-440001-204401-101001 $2,282.00 DP Publishing/Legal Notices 09 v 0010-440001-204401-101001 $163.00 DP Tech Maint Fee 09 , 0010-440001-4610312-101001 $22.82 DPCR Recorders Fee 09 0010-470001-4612319-101001 $50.00 DPEHLUP Minor Use Permit 0021-540011-4614901-101001 $316.00 DPFPP Minor Use Permit 09 0100-450001-4617240-101001 $114.00 DPLDRF Minor Use Permit 09 0010-440004-4611700-101001 $163.00 Total Fees Paid: $5,223.76 • Name and address of applicant: L� DECLARATION OF FEES DUE (California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4) AT&T Mobility c/o FRANK SCHABARUM 10615 QUAIL HOLLOW LANE REDDING, CA 96003 Project Title/File Number: MINOR USE PERMIT (MUP10-0001); APN: 007-390-001 CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: NOTICE OF EXEMPTION / STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION ❑ A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $50.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee ❑ B. Certificate of No Effect $50.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED ❑ A. Negative Declaration $2,010.00 State Filing Fee $50.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee ❑ B. Environmental Impact Report $2768.25 State Filing Fee $50.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. ® NOTICE OF DETERMINATION — FEE NOT REQUIRED No Effect Determination from Dept. of Fish and Game $50.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT / NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. ® PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s): P1801 2. ❑ NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Plannine Official By: Tim Snellings, Development Services Title: Director Lead Agency: Butte County Department of Development Services Date: November 30, 2010 TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. State of California - Th sources Aaency A LD SCHWARZENEGGER Governor DEPARTMENT OF H AND GAME http://www.dfg.ca.gov Environmental Review and Permitting 1416 Ninth Street, Suite 1260 Sacramento, California 95814 CEQA Filing Fee No Effect Determination Form Date Submitted: October 26, 2010 Applicant Name: AT&T Mobility, c/o Frank Schabarum Applicant Address: 10615 Quail Hollow Lane, Redding, CA 96003 Project Name: AT&T Mobility — Minor Use Permit CEQA Lead Agency: Butte County Department of Development Services CEQA Document Type: Negative Declaration SCH Number and/or Local agency ID number: MUP10-0001 Project Location: The project site is located at 3415 Silverbell Road, approximately 500 feet south of Eaton Road, Chico. Brief Project Description: This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to collocate twelve (12) panel antennas at the height of 85 feet and two (2) - 2 -foot diameter microwave antennas below the proposed 12 panel antennas on an existing 1.20 -foot lattice tower. The 12 panel antennas will be located on 3 sectors (4 per sector). Ground based equipment will be secured within a 12' x 20' lease area inside an existing building adjacent to the base of the tower. Other equipment will include eighteen (18) coax cables, three (3) Remote Radio Units and six (6) TMAs secured behind the panel antennas. Butte County Code Section 24-262(d) requires a Minor Use Permit for a collocation on an existing tower it the existing tower or other collocations did not complete an environmental analysis per CEQA. Determination: Please retain this original determination for your records; you are required to file a copy of this determination with the County Clerk'after your project is approved and at the time of filing of the CEQA lead agency's Notice of Determination (NOD). If you do not file a copy of this determination with the County Clerk at the time of filing of the NOD, the appropriate CEQA filing fee will be due and payable. Without a valid No Effect Determination Form or proof of fee payment, the project will not be operative, vested, or final and any local permits issued for the project will be invalid, pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)(3). Issued By: �c Title: Staff Environmental Scientist Date: November 30, 2010 Conserving California's Wif ffe Since 1870 • COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OR. OVILLE, CA. 1 RECEIVED FROM PLANNING SAO # 426 ATR NO 69912 DEPOSIT DATE 9/312010 DEPT /. FUND FUND COST ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION INV# TITLE CODE CNTR CODE CODE AMOUNT RECEIPTS: P1800: P1801: CR000107 RECEIVED ON: 82 DEFERRED REV PLNG . GENL 0010 20.4401 101.001 2;446:0 PLANWINO. APDL: FEES WNL 0010 440001 4210900 101001 17j'sz;06 GENL PLN MAINT FEE GENL 0010 440001 4610E311 1011331.1 101;69 TECH MA INT FEE = DEV SVCS GENL 0010 440001 46.10312 101001 22:82 LAND DEVELOPMENT GENL 0610 440004. 4611:700 - 101001 163.00' NODINOE CLERK'S FILING FEE .GENL0010 1470 _01 46.12319 101001 600:00 ENVIRONMENTAL.HLTH PH FUND 0021 540011 4614901 101041 4714.00 FIRE: PLNG APFVFEE FIRE: PROTECT 0100 4WW1 4617240 101001 1.14.00 FISH & GAME FEES CLERWRECORD 280: 1011460 2,0142$ / . -` OTAL S _ 22;906.76 APPROVED. BY: RECEIVED -BY: AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER By: _ By: white=treasurer pink --auditor canary --depositor golden toddle Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile www.buttecounty.net/dds www.buttegeneralplan.net ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * PLANNING November 18, 2010 AT&T Mobility c/o Frank Schabarum 10615 Quail Hollow Lane Redding, CA 96003 Re: Minor Use Permit: MUP10-0001; APN 007-390-001 Dear Mr. Schabarum: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held November 18, 2010 your request for a minor use permit to collocate on an existing self -supported 120 foot lattice communications tower and lease area was approved. Should you desire to appeal any of the conditions (attached) imposed by the Planning Commission, you must do so in writing, prior to 5:00 p.m., Monday, November 29, 2010 to the: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 25 County Center Drive Oroville, California, 95965 The appeal fee of $450.00 must be paid at that time. If you do not appeal, and if there are no other appeals within the 10 calendar -day appeal period, the action of the Planning Commission is final. APPROVAL OF PROJECT SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF ALL APPLICABLE FEES Payment of all applicable fees will be required as a condition of approval for your project or proof of waiver of fees. Prompt payment of invoiced amounts will expedite the approval process in satisfying this condition. Page 1 of 2 The conditions of approval must be met within twelve (12) months from the date of approval by the Butte County Planning Commission or the approval will be considered null and void. A minor use permit shall lapse and shall become void one (1) year following the date on which it was approved, unless prior to the expiration: (1) A building permit is issued and construction is commenced and diligently pursued toward completion on the site which was the subject of the use permit application; or A minor use permit subject to lapse may be renewed for an additional period of up to one (1) year, provided that sixty (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date, an application for renewal of the minor use permit is filed with the planning manager on the prescribed form and accompanied by the necessary data and fees. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (530) 538-7376, or by email at mmichelena@buttecounty.ne between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Mark Michelena Senior Planner Enc. cc. SP Thomas Company, Attn: Steve Thomas, 2530 Douglas Blvd, Suite 130, Roseville, CA 95661 Public Works — Land Development Division Environmental Health Cal Fire/Butte County Fire Page 2 of 2 9 • BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT — November 18, 2010 Applicant: AT&T Mobility (c/o Frank Supervisor Schabarum) District: 3 Owner: Pacific Gas & Electric Co. File #: MUP 10-0001 Planner: Mark Michelena Request: AT&T Mobility is requesting Location: The project site is located at approval to collocate on an 3415 Silverbell Road, existing 120 -foot communication approximately 500 feet south tower and occupying a 1,725 of Eaton Road, Chico. square foot lease, including a 240 square foot area for the ground Attachments: equipment in an existing building. G.P.: C (Commercial) A: Resolution with Exhibit A Zoning: C-2 (General Commercial) B: General Plan/ Zoning Map and Vicinity Map Zone Date: September 17, 1968 C: Initial Study/Negative Declaration APN: 007-390-001 D: Photo Simulations Parcel Size: 1.22 acres E: Site Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: AT&T Mobility is requesting approval to collocate the following equipment on an existing 120 -foot communication tower within a 1,725 square foot lease area. The project consists of: 1. Mounting of up to three (3) antenna sectors with up to four (4) antennas per sector and two (2), 2 -foot diameter microwave dishes below the panel antennas. a. The panel antennas will be centered at the 85 -foot level. b. The microwave dishes will be centered at the 80 -foot level. 2. One (1) 12 'x 20' equipment area (240 square feet) within the existing building. 3. Installation of coax lines and supporting equipment next to the antenna and interior space within the existing building for ground equipment. As the AT&T Mobility facilities will be located inside the existing fenced area and the existing building, no additional fencing is required. No grading will take place. Staff recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and approval of the Minor Use Permit with findings and conditions. ■ Butte County PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ ■ November 18, 2010 ■ AT&T Mobility (c/o Frank Schabarum) MUP 10-0001 Agenda Report ■ Page 1 of 13 ■ • 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: • This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to collocate and operate a telecommunications facility for wireless internet on an existing 120 -foot communications tower within a 1,725 square foot lease. • The project consists of: 1. Mounting of up to three (3) antenna sectors with up to four (4) antennas per sector and two (2), 2 -foot diameter microwave dishes below the panel antennas. a. The panel antennas will be centered at the 85 -foot level. b. The microwave dishes will be centered at the 80 -foot level. 2. One (1) 12 'x 20' equipment area (240 square feet) within the existing building. 3. Installation of coax lines and supporting equipment next to the antenna and interior space within the existing building for ground equipment. • No excavation or grading will occur as a result of the proposed project. • Collocations are required to meet structural requirements of the California Building Code, as well as section 24-262 (Wireless communications) of the Butte County Code. • Minimal traffic will be generated during the construction phase while a crew travels to and from the site. • In its operational phase, the AT&T Mobility project will be unmanned and will not require water, waste treatment or management of hazardous waste. • The site will be in operation twenty four (24) hours a day, seven days a week. There will be approximately two to three visits per month by a radio technician for routine maintenance. • No advertising or signage is proposed, except signs required by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and emergency contact information. • This request for a Minor Use Permit to allow the collocation of a wireless communications facility is in accordance with Butte County Code Section 24-262(k) and State law, which require certification of an environmental impact report or adoption of a negative or mitigated negative declaration for collocations proposed on towers that have not been subject to previous discretionary and environmental review per the California Environmental Quality Act. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: • The project parcel is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and is designated C (Commercial) by the Butte County General Plan. • Adjacent zoning, general plan designations and land use are presented in the table below. General Plan DesiLynation Direction Existing North C South C/LDR East C/LDR General Plan Designation Zoning Proposed Existing R & O C-2 R & O/ MDR C -2/A -SR R & O/ MDR C -2/A -SR ■ Butte County PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ ■ November 18, 2010 ■ AT&T Mobility (c/o Frank Schabarum) MUP10-0001 Agenda Report ■ Page 2 of 13 ■ • The project proposes to lease 1,725 square feet, which includes 240 square feet inside an existing building which will be used for the ground equipment. • The site is not located within a Flood Zone (100 -year flood zone), as show on the FIRM map 06007CO340 C (effective June 8, 1998). • Access to the site will be from Silverbell Road, a county -maintained paved road. ANALYSIS: Zoning/General Plan Consistency • Per Butte County Code Sections 24-262 (d) and (k) (based upon the updated Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance 3956, approved February 13, 2007), collocations on facilities in the C-2 (General Commercial) zone require only a building permit, unless the facility was not subject to a county or city discretionary permit process within which there was full CEQA compliance. • The project site is designated as Commercial by the Land Use Element Map of the General Plan, which allows public uses as secondary uses (note: mobile phone service providers are considered a public utility because they are regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission). • The proposed collocation complies with the commercial zone standards for the C-2 zone as stated in Butte County Code Section 24-2620)(1). Land Use • The project would not result in a significant increase in air emissions, fugitive dust emissions, light, noise, or vehicle traffic. • Only a minor amount of construction activity would be required to install the proposed antennas and wiring. • The proposed antennas are not expected to create any significant visual impacts because they would not increase the height of the existing tower. • Photo simulations (see Attachment D) of the proposed antennas show that they would not significantly change the appearance of the tower. • No emergency power generator is proposed to be installed in the existing equipment shelter. Radio -Frequency (RF) Emissions • A radio-frequency analysis, prepared by an electrical engineer (Evan Wappel, Market Radio Frequency Safety Coordinator for AT&T Mobility) and incorporated in the project file, determined that the emissions from the existing and proposed antennas would not exceed the Federal Communication Commission's (FCC) general exposure limits at ground level in any uncontrolled areas. • The Radio Frequency Analysis states that AT&T Mobility fields at ground level are 0.24% of the existing FCC standard guidelines for general population uncontrolled exposure. ■ Butte County PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ ■ November 18, 2010 ■ AT&T Mobility (c/o Frank Schabarum) MUP10-0001 Agenda Report ■ Page 3 of 13 ■ • The proposed operation of the site would be in compliance with the FCC requirements for public exposure to RF radiation. Conditions The project has been conditioned to meet the requirements of Section 24-262, including: • Radio-frequency emissions in excess of FCC standards are not allowed. • Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned and must be removed. • Written verification submitted annually attesting that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC Office of Engineering & Technology Bulletin 65 (Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, August 1997). • Submittal of a bond or cash deposit to cover the cost of a radio-frequency study and removal of the proposed facilities. • Engineering analysis to ensure that the proposed communications tower would be able to support the proposed antennas. • The project application materials were circulated to Environmental Health, Public Works/Land Development, Assessor's Office, and Cal-Fire/Butte County Fire. No concerns or were noted. Appropriate conditions of approval were incorporated. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: An Initial Study, for which no significant environmental impacts were identified, was prepared for this project and made available for public review at the Planning Division and on-line at the Butte County web site for the 20 -day period between October 28, 2010 and November 18, 2010. A Notice of Intent to adopt the negative declaration was published in the Chico Enterprise Record on October 28, 2010, and notices that the initial study/negative declaration was available for review were sent to 19 owners of properties adjacent to the project parcel on October 24, 201.0. COMMENTS: No comments were received from the public. ■ Butte County PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ ■ November 18, 2010 ■ AT&T Mobility (c/o Frank Schabarum) MUP10-0001 Agenda Report ■ Page 4 of 13 ■ • ■ Butte County PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ ■ November 18, 2010 ■ AT&T Mobility (c/o Frank Schabarum) MUP10-0001 Agenda Report ■ Page 5 of 13 ■ RESOLUTION - A RESOLUTION OF THE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING MINOR USE PERMIT MUP10-0001 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered Minor Use Permit MUP 10-0001 for AT&T Mobility c/o Frank Schabarum, in accordance with Chapter 24, Section 41; Minor Use Permits, of the Butte County Code on Assessor's Parcel Number 007-390-001; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered an Initial Study and Negative Declaration in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, said Minor Use Permit was referred to various affected public and private agencies, County departments, and referral agencies for review and comments; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held on November 18, 2010; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered public comments and a report from the Planning Division. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission: I. Adopts a Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study identified no significant environmental effects. B. The Planning Commission has considered the Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process.. C. On the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study and any comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, Planning Division File No. MUP 10-0001 would have a significant effect on the environment. D. The Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. E. The custodian of the record is the Department of Development Services. The location of the record is 7 County Center Drive, Oroville CA 95965. II. Finds that the collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 is required, prior to filing a Notice of Determination for the project, unless the project proponent provides verification from the California Department of Fish and Game that the project is exempt from the fee requirement. If a required fee is not paid for a project, the project will not be operative, vested or final and any local permits issued for the project will be invalid (Section 711.4 (c) (3)). ■ Butte County PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ ■ November 18, 2010 ■ AT&T Mobility (c/o Frank Schabarum) MUP10-0001 Agenda Report ■ Page 6 of 13 ■ III. Makes the following Minor Use Permit findings: A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: i. Conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities). The project is in accord with the purposes of the C-2 (General Commercial) Zone and the Butte County General Plan designation of Commercial. The C-2 Zone allows collocations with approval of a Minor Use Permit when the tower facility has not been previously subjected to a discretionary permit process within which there was full CEQA compliance. The Commercial land use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. ii. Collocation of antennas on existing towers decreases the need for communication towers elsewhere to provide service. Reducing the number of communication towers needed to provide necessary service is a benefit to the County. B. The, location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use would be compatible with, and would not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: 1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas would not increase the height of the existing communications tower. Visual simulations of the proposed collocation suggest that it would not substantially change the bulk or scale of the collocation. 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities: Electrical power service is already established at the property. A water source and a sewage disposal system are not required because the facility will be unmanned. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The Radio Frequency Analysis states that AT&T Mobility fields at ground level are 0.24% of the existing FCC standard guidelines for general population uncontrolled exposure. The proposed antennas would not result in a significant visual impact to the neighborhood in that the new antennas and mounting hardware are relatively small and would be painted to match the existing color of the communications tower. The proposed antennas would not generate any noise. ■ Butte County PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ ■ November 18, 2010 ■ AT&T Mobility (c/o Frank Schabarum) MUP10-0001 Agenda Report ■ Page 7 of 13 ■ 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Only a negligible amount of vehicle traffic would occur during installation of the antennas and equipment cabinets. The communications facility would be unmanned and there would only be approximately two to three visits per month by a radio technician for routine maintenance after installation. Silverbell Road would provide access for the project site and would not be impacted by the negligible increase in vehicular traffic. 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed: The site is ideally suited for the project because the proposed antennas would be mounted on an existing communications tower that would provide additional wireless service to surrounding area of the County. Related ground equipment will be located within an existing building. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed collocation application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use would cause any other relevant impact. An initial study prepared for the project did not identify any significant impacts resulting from the project. C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. D. The radio-frequency emissions generated by the antennas on the communications tower would be below the public exposure limits set by the FCC for wireless communication facilities. E. The proposed antennas would not create any impacts to aircraft operations because they will not increase the height of the previously approved communications tower nor extend horizontally beyond the other proposed antennas. F. Wireless telephone services are regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission and are considered to be a public use consistent with the C-2 (General Commercial) Zone and the C (Commercial) General Plan land use designation. IV. Approves Minor Use Permit MUP10-0001 for AT&T Mobility, subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A" A. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of Butte County Code Chapter 24, Section 262. Conditions of approval have been ■ Butte County PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ ■ November 18, 2010 ■ AT&T Mobility (c/o Frank Schabarum) MUP10-0001 Agenda Report ■ Page 8 of 13 ■ applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24- 262 (Wireless Communication Facilities). The project is in accord with the purposes of the C-2 (General Commercial) Zone and the Butte County General Plan designation of C (Commercial). The C land use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 2010, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chair Nelson Planning Commission County of Butte, State of California ATTEST: TIM SNELLINGS, Secretary Planning Commission County of Butte, State of California ■ Butte County PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT a ■ November 18, 2010 o AT&T Mobility (c/o Frank Schabarum) MUP 10-0001 Agenda Report ■ Page 9 of 13 0 EXHIBIT A MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) MUP10-0001 PERMIT NO. 007-390-001 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: AT&T Mobility is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with application filed to collocate on an existing 120 -foot communication tower and occupying a 240 square foot lease area within an existing building for the ground equipment. The project consists of: Mounting of up to three (3) antenna sectors with up to four (4) antennas per sector and two (2), 2 -foot diameter microwave dishes below the panel antennas. - The panel antennas will be centered at the 85 -foot level. - The microwave dishes will be centered at the 80 -foot level. Installation of coax lines and supporting equipment next to the antenna and interior space within the existing building for ground equipment. One (1) 12 'x 20' equipment area (240 square feet) within the existing building. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of this Minor Use Permit constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-41. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Minor Use Permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this Minor Use Permit must be established within 12 months of the delivery of the countersigned permit to the Permittee. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid, and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of receipt of the countersigned permit by the Permittee, the permit shall ■ Butte County PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ ■ November 18, 2010 ■ AT&T Mobility (c/o Frank Schabarum) MUP10-0001 Agenda Report ■ Page 10 of 13 ■ become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. Conditions of Approval: Planning Division 1. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Attachment E", and is incorporated herein by this reference. 2. The new antennas and mounting hardware shall be painted to match the existing neutral color of the proposed communications tower. 3. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division that all associated towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the California Building Code. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 5. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 6. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 7. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 8. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 10. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as ■ Butte County PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ ■ November 18, 2010 ■ AT&T Mobility (c/o Frank Schabarum) MUP10-0001 Agenda Report ■ Page 11 of 13 ■ it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65. 11. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of removal. 13. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 14. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division no later than January 31 of each year. 15. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 16. The collocation of the antennas allowed by this Minor Use Permit requires the issuance of a building permit from the Butte County Building Division. The Building Division, based upon engineered calculations submitted by the applicant, may determine that the tower cannot physically support the requested number of antennas. If that is the case, the number of new antennas allowed on the tower may be less than the number of antennas permitted by this Minor Use Permit. Processing Fees 17. Prior to issuance of the Minor Use Permit, pay any outstanding project -related processing fees. County Counsel 18. If this entire matter or any finding, action or condition of this matter is appealed to the Board of Supervisors, the applicant or any other developer/operator other than the applicant agrees to indemnify the County of Butte from liability or loss related to the ■ Butte County PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ ■ November 18, 2010 ■ AT&T Mobility (c/o Frank Schabarum) MUP10-0001 Agenda Report ■ Page 12 of 13 ■ L_] approval of this project and agrees to sign an indemnification agreement in a form approved by County Counsel before the Board's appeal hearing. If the application is not appealed, this condition is deemed satisfied. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this Minor Use Permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Date: Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Division permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. cc: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Division Butte County Fire Department/CDF Assessors Office GVROJECTS - APPLICATIONSWUPIAT&T Mobility - MUP10-0001\Planning Commission\ATT Mobility MUPIO-0001_PC Agenda Report - Final.doe e Butte County PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT o ® November 18, 2010 ® AT&T Mobility (c/o Frank Schabarum) MUP10-0001 Agenda Report o Page 13 of 13 I abed SS298191.6 SZ:II Z0-60-OIOZ Butte County DeMr*wnt of DewJopment Services u TF TIM SR'RIJ,lNGS. DW.0 TOR 1 MIM CAI ARCO, ASSISTANT DMECTOR u � 7County Center Drive 00 OVOVH* CA 95M v G y •c �'y� o (!06) SWI601 Telephove (s��> s3s-nas Plaeskatile vet PROMCT•INFORMATION APPLICMT'S SA,(If' t is difenm fwm o an t is mquired) ASSFSSOR'S P3M NUMBELL' AT#rM06Yc� PfAwkSchA M 00"1 - 0 - ooE ADDRI•'i�: STIW:F r, CITY. STATE. a zrn CODE wi r-1►taiNIL. 0c, t s o I (aao 45300,); -o:243 l All.: FAX: sC,�QbLIsix 1OL-a •nct (530 oda -c7y3 O ER'S NAV"531 TlVt14*i fT L£PHtiKC S ' M qw (rL1.�e)� *Q ago ADDRTMi T. :11 L , A VP CO 9-530 1 auol)15 r3lvL5. ui 130, 9wev"lle. a 9541.1 PROPERTY INFORMATION ..%wE)F PKO SEpp PRONFC.'T (wanly) �Sr—r E SSL7r (in squaw feet a s) Aldi o cPTe = Nola SoR l l •aa gc(rc5 I.00A'110N 0— P1t.ONECT ('50w cam suet:ts and addn:3L% if my) 3415 ►1vu�c 4 G9-194-13sliVeAell ROM) 4� E-Alwl soap ZONE (TNE7tAL PLAN &X IKG I.AND USE � PROPOSED LAND USI: u nNG STRt 7UtRr-S (squme kd) PROPOSED STRUCTURES,( cerc fed) UNDER AhILUAMSON CONTRACT 130. �t/_ �E�* Co l >�ttM r �QNtr ❑VasCK T�o (C ok Oeo) I (Check One) El PROPERTY is URPROPOsm TO BFSI:Wilkm 0 PROPfkly 1.9 OR PROPosED-1'0 DG ON PUBLIC WAlu 0 PROPERTY 1S OR PROPOSTD TO BE ON SSVnC ❑ PROPERTY I&OR IMROK^h1) TO PA -ON WFLL WATER APPLYCATION TYPE ADMIMSTRXHVE PERMIT ] 1ENTATIVL' SUDDNV31ON MAP ❑ L ecAI. Lar DErEXXINAMON BUTTE Q-rENTAT!VFi PARCEI.. MAP Ilse PERMIT COUNTY O W AIV -M OF PARCH b1AP Cl MINOR USE PERMCr� �Q�U ❑ CER7IFICA rb Of: CORAWOON ❑ COb1MtflJ1G110N5 FACIlJTYP/Dd1 U1P U ! ❑ R67.ONk Q VARIANCE DEVELOPMENT (] OENFXAl.PIAN AWONDW. NT MINOR VARIANU SERVICES D MININ4 AND RJ CL.AMATION PIAN Q IAYT HN''L•' AD1Urrwa ❑ DEVELOPMENTAGREDAE1NT ❑ CERI VICATE OI' MERGER, ❑ Omit PROJECT DESCRIPTION VLlL.L MCR] IrnM OF PROPOSED PRONQCT (Attach necessary sb*AL If ibis appliatioo is fix a lend div inion. dcscrft the number aau sim �roSt?b ATA_ T NO}tJl G: i tx1c;; t C; 1) un/vi to N er a) pbwe lr/Ir ,v �• er rvi tri 4o e (a)-,; 'Ate �r KrtrrotaA� eNw a _lrl i�rl-- lv�va. iu �i11 i7wt ._�tg�1�. _ OWNER CERTIFICATION t C�RT1F ' i1{ATl ANN Mr-.NTt.V THf,1.1:-AL OWNER OR THE AU7N(1RliED AUENT Of INE OWNER (W THE ABOVE DESCKWED PROPERTY. FURTHEN l ACILNOWLEDGF.THE FJJANG (W 7111S APPLICKnON AND0ilt111'V'f11AY ALL oy,rkih ARUVG M-01tMA11ON IC lRt;G AND ACCl1RATb (Ifan agent 'ts W be authorized, execute an ttMdsvit of —zuti d incl rRekW vn with this applicxt(on) DATE: �i•" , SIONAIURE: • PEMME- ZA d SSLZ98L916 << S09LLL609. SdW0H13A31S S6:tl ZO-60-0L0Z 2010-09-02 11:35 STEVE THOMAS • 7604717605 >> 9167662155 • ? 2/2 AGIFAT AoTaORMATION To Butte County. Department of Development Services- F-r*rsk SC,baba(gm (A 7aa 6-7N3 Print Name orAgent Phone Number IG41 r�atloc� Ne +'��. cQ 94003 Mailing A&k= is hereby authorized to process this application on my/our property, identified as Butte County Assessors Parcel Number(s) 007 340 -roc t "Chis authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sig all documents mmmary for said processing, but not including document (s) relating to record title interest. I Print Name Print Nave of Applicest rif other than owner) PrW Namc Signwury Prim Name Signature .Sk"Aure of Applicant (441her rhwr oruaery �e ua4e tASsoUA-kO -, A4417jd0-. qa9 Print Name of California �Civil .f aginoer/l,end Surveyor Phone Number 1 1 S SRO To" - PJ-ia)R?. �, SOIC Nkw%fF Be+ 6 cA WOO ('��rrJ d W/ o+r A0LCOM Mailing AddresY Email Address BUTTE COUNTY SEP - 2 2010 DER©ICESN f Z'd 991Z96L%6 t13S Alb3dOtld WN01SS3dOtid g9£:0101 ZO deS Butte County DepartmeWof Development Services �UTTF TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR o , �'11,� �� o 7 County Center Drive o Oroville, CA 0 ¢ fir a 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone 00. o r'' o (530) 538-7785 Facsimile CSU N'�y PROJECT INFORMATION �n Project vp t o-oo�l APPLICANT'S NA (If appli ant is different from owne an idavit is required.) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: T T Mob�ll CIO Frgwl- SCQ0 rUM 00`1 -390 - 00( ADDRESS: STREET, CITY, STATE, & ZIP CODE TELEPHONE: 1 ou ov l lt.) I w C4 co�3 Is ti I o Ake,c q (5500d) -o"743 TAIL:FAX: rAN ko SCA a66ru & LIS 6C2 lo�i.rve- (53o )?aa -()7y3 OWNER'S NAME: h TELEPHONE: 51 MET, ® ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, & ZIP CO - b000 145 SI,��e /30 WEV/He, CA gs6G1 (9530 r31��5._ 0 PROPERTY INFORMATION NAME OF PRO OSE PROJECT (if any) ATA l?ro�ec Ste CN085o4tJ9 $ SITE SIZE (in square feet or acres) l.aa ACIreS . LOCATION OF PROJECT (major cross streets and address, if any) 34IS Silvcrbcll C4 Sri 3 SI(vcrbell R01404� ERiow %�O�au •t2o�1 Chico ZONE C-al IC-Commercial GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE I Commerde-1 PROPOSED LAND USE Si;mE at' NIA EXISTING STRUCTURES (square feet) 6/ Il i)c 4f k)+e PROPOSED STRUCTURES( feet) COIIoC�a►OSI130. 440er" UNDER WILLIAMSON ACT CONTRACT ❑ Yes XNo (Check One) ' (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION TYPE ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP USE PERMIT BUTTE ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT COUNTY ❑ CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION ❑ COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY UP/MUP SEP —2 20TO ❑ REZONE Lu [:1 VARIANCE E] GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DEERVVICESICES vi'1' ❑ SE MINOR VARIANCE S❑MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER. ❑ OTHER r PROTECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number//and size - 0 ols)Se� .l}T4T N►oloi�l' r�i�'cle :4.. .o NILtTI cI%�i/ Nvowiw Coll i`i dC }c> -Ewcl cQa) ArJ� uf�NNa f S'jer * e a,i� erA ew Nfi-iv 5ecuK iiq a) -a � • IeH Cr icirpwA� AL- ewrvaf be/ou m NAj,4S. 1.NSA// firi►7CO- weo AwA su ) e la4rolilc Cqo ilopl e m Nfen, awd Nicriut Ce rrot) OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.) DATE: SIGNATURE: AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services: �rWrJ�C SGh� �uwl (53q 7;)9•6-7N3 Print Name of Agent Phone Number l_S O. p 11411ouu LaPie . 2edd 1 L9 , C A Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application on my/our. property, identified as Butte County Assessors Parcel Numbergs) 00 This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document (s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record (sign and print name) Print Name Print Name Signature Signature Print Name Print Name Signature - Signature Print Name of Applicant (if other than owner) Signature of Applicant (if other than owner) �e ff rey AsSoo pt�t4 7l40- 39x9 Print Name of California Civil Engineer/Land Surveyor Phone Number 3 SRN Toy iw?0ZA SUllc 155tkUj ri' &-octl CR q.66o ro b;rj d AC611J@ AoI•COM Mailing Addresy Email Address BUTTE COUNTY SEP - 2 2010 DEVELOPN>uty Y SERVICES Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile PROJECT SETTING DESCRIPTION INSTRUCTIONS Applicant Name: !D fi tki SAR," Project Number: /H0110 -000/ Please address the following on a separate sheet of paper: 1. Identify any applicable proposed development schedule, including anticipated, incremental, or phased development and all associate projects. 2. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies. 3. Describe the site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants, animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. 4. Describe the surrounding properties, including. information on plants, animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). 5. Include any special studies prepared for the project site including, but not limited to traffic, biology, wetlands delineation, archaeology, etc. BUTTE COUNTY SEP 2 2010 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY PROJECT SETTING DESCRIPTION INSTRUCTIONS SES' '- Z 2010 DEVELOPMENT Comments by Applicant SERVICES 1. This application will be submitted on 9/02/2010 with an anticipated receipt of acceptance letter within 30 days of application submittal. This project involves securing up to twelve (12) AT&T Mobility panel antennas at a height of 85', to the support legs of a.130.8' tall self support lattice tower,. currently occupied by Metro PCS and Clearwire antennas and associated tower mounted equipment. AT&T Mobility would also like to obtain entitlement to secure up to two (2) — 2' diameter microwave antennas below the proposed location of the antennas. AT&T ground based equipment will be secured within a 12' x 20' lease area inside the existing building unit adjacent to the base of the tower. Assuming a 3 to 4 month zoning approval process and the opportunity to submit construction drawings for a building permit during the zoning approval process, the development schedule for this site could put us at a construction commencement date at or around March 1, 2011. The initial installation requirement for AT&T requires twelve (12) panel antennas over 3 sectors, eighteen (18) coax lines, three (3) Remote Radio Units and six (6) TMAs secured behind the panel antennas. 2. Once zoning approval has been obtained via a Minor Use Permit, we will be required to obtain Plan Check review and a Building Permit. Prior to construction commencement, AT&T will register this site with the FCC. 3. The project site is on a flat, 1.22 acre parcel of property that has been developed into three (3) separate free standing single story buildings for lease to existing commercial and/or light industrial type tenants. The subject tower is situated at the end or westerly side of the property as it backs up to the Ca1TRANS easement for the Hwy. 99 off ramp to Eaton Road. The property has a couple of mature tall trees at the westerly property line and additional tall mature trees placed at the front of the property within the landscape strip fronting Silverbell Road. Animal life for this property would be typical for a suburban developed neighborhood which could include local birds and/or squirrels or other typical rodents. I cannot think of any cultural, historical or scenic aspects associated with the property that would need to be mentioned in this project setting description. 4. The subject property is bordered to the West by the Hwy. 99 corridor, to the South and Southeast by single family residences and to the North and northeast by commercial land uses and operations. The most notable land use and operation to the North and Northeast is the local radio station on the corner. of Eaton -and Silverbell Roads. Each of the surrounding properties are accented by tall mature trees and typical landscape areas in the front and side yards. I cannot think of any cultural, historical or scenic aspects associated with the surrounding properties that would need to be mentioned or require special attention. 5. Since the project site is presently fully developed for commercial, light industrial and wireless telecommunications uses, I cannot think of any special studies required except for a cumulative .radio frequency analysis that accounts for the radio frequency emissions'for all carriers: That analysis is provided in this zoning submittal application package. . August 4, 2010 Aerial photographs showing the viewpoints for the photoslmulatlons. © Copyright 2010, Previsualists Inc., all rights reserved. Any modification, alteration, cropping, copying or editing of any portion of this image is strictly prohibited and considered a violation of US copyright laws.��� This photosimulation is based upon information provided by the project applicant Questions or comments? call 1.877-799-3210 or visit www.photosim.com r1 August 4, 2010 PhotoSIMUIation of view looking west from the nearest point along Silverbell Road. © Copyright 2010, Previsualists Inc., all rights reserved. Any modification, alteration, cropping, copying or editing of any portion of this image is strictly prohibited and considered a violation of US copyright laws. This photosimulation is based upon information provided by the project applicant Questions or comments? call 1-877-799-3210 or visit www.photosim.com .,r..a.,.a.1-91, August 4, 2010 Photosimulation of view looking east from across Hwy 99, on the southbound onramp from Eaton Rd. Proposed antennas t - 7W, ! -' J a', �_ y ty 1111' L �e� g : 'rWA mid bw .+ f _ Chico Bank Bldg 3415 Silverbell Road Chico, CA 95973 CN0890 at&t r,�, , ,�+y' w �.f '�• © Copyright 2010, Previsualists Inc., all rights reserved. Any modification, alteration, cropping, copying or editing of any portion of this image is strictly prohibited and considered a violation of US copyright laws. This photosimulation is based upon information provided by the project applicant Questions or comments? call 1.877-799-3210 or visit www.photosim.com EXIT..<�,..T Yet• t 389 i} EXIT .� 7•i ,;� "�. 389 �'���� Y a.� ;, •' '��'� ,• tr .d ;r tom.. ;'%Z, :fry i. _ ! J• :•Y- _ y�♦ ''SS .Y'l Yom'- ` * 1 ♦ � H �•'/ +` .. ZL rr}�'�; •'',�'+` r sem,; 'I_ � � � `wSi,�' h Y 4 •ry r•.. Seg 4, r r+er%tChico Bank Bldg 3415 Sliverbell Road _ t +• e •,�IChico, CA 95973` 1Vi y aftt e � • • I \ L O W O N. o � 00 o� N O ^ O 0 0 C CD CD E • Wilson Landing Rd A. 1. 7� o- —� LEGEND, tf Signal Strength Levels '-I: I. -bldg, fl r In -transit • f�Outdoor, 1 1 CeII,ShO Symbols.. 'r :A Existing AT&T Sitos I* Proposed New AT&T Site ...._ .:..._..—_-_._._. t lei •s � S/ Nord NWy' n� '9 t m: A Bell I _ 1 Bell �'• t � M1 1 32 I� ' KennedY Ave,�� t � Oak Wa 9 r� Existing Coverage with Proposed CNU0890-A (85') ./30/2010 m Al L f7AMtA'.,' vl A, IL MAt 4 V d MOO Radio Frequency Analysis AT&T Mobility citA if rninQ4n Report Summary Based upon information provided by AT&T Mobility and the design engineer; and using the calculated method for determining RF field strength, it is the engineer's opinion that the proposed AT&T Mobility site to be located at 3415 Silverbell Rd., Chico, CA 95973 will comply with the FCC's current prevailing standard for limiting human exposure to RF energy. Due to the mounting method utilized, the general public would not normally be:able to approach the antennas. Therefore, no significant impact on the general population is expected. The calculated electromagneticfield strength level in publicly accessible areas is less than the existing standard allows for exposure of unlimited duration. Additionally, due to the mounting method used, no significant impact on the environment is expected. For personnel who work within 11' of the face of an antenna, a training program in exposure to RF fields is recommended. Maintenance personnel should be instructed to contact the appropriate Carrier prior to working in front of an antenna. Recommended Signage There is. no RF caution signs required at the site. Background Evan Wappel is the Market RF Safety Coordinator for AT&T Mobility.and is responsible for conducting a Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic analysis for the AT&T Mobility site to be located at 3415 Silverbell Rd., Chico, CA 95973. This analysis consists of a review of the proposed site conditions, calculation of the estimated RF field strength of the antennas, and the provision of a comparison of the estimated field strength with the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) recommended guidelines for human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields. Site Description Based upon the information provided by AT&T Mobility, 12 AT&T Mobility panel antennas are mounted on a tower. The antennas will be mounted approximately 83' (to bottom of antennas) above ground level. The antennas will be oriented such that the main lobes are oriented toward the horizon. Normal public access to the front of the antennas is not expected due to the mounting location and method utilized. Occupational access to the front of the antennas is not normally expected. RF Field Strength Calculation Methodology A generally accepted method is used to calculate the expected RF field strength. The method uses the FCC's recommended.equationl which predicts field strength on a worst case basis by (2) 2 PG PG EIRP Equation 1 S 4.,T )TR.9 RZ doubling the predicted field. strength. The following equation is used to predict maximum RF field strength: . Where: S = power density P = power input to the antenna G = power gain of the antenna in the direction of interest relative to an isotropic radiator R = distance to the center of radiation of the antenna 1 Reference Federal Communication Commission Office of Engineering Technology Bulletin 65 • Cumulative Study • The ground level effect of the AT&T Mobility and other carriers' emissions was calculated using a maximum ERP of 7,497 watts. Results were calculated for a height of 6' above ground level. Using these factors, the maximum calculated AT&T Mobility fields at ground level are 0.24% of the existing standard for general population, uncontrolled exposure. The additional antennas are for evaluation purposes only and the calculations for the two additional carriers are not based on actual data for any carrier. See Table 1 for the FCC's guidelines on Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE). Note that the RF ranges referenced for this analysis are the ranges of 300 —1500 Mhz, and 1500 100,000 Mhz shown in Table 1, which is included in Appendix A. Exposure Environments The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependent on the situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to exposure. The decision as to which tier applies in a given situation should be based on the application of the following definitions. Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general population/uncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. General population/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made, fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public always fall under this category when exposure is not employment-related. For purposes of applying these definitions, awareness of the potential for RF exposure in a workplace or similar environment can be provided through specific training as part of a RF safety program. Warning signs and labels can also be used to establish such awareness as long as they provide information, in a prominent. manner, on risk of potential exposure.and instructions on methods to minimize such exposure risk. For example, a sign warning of RF exposure risk and indicating that.individuals should not remain in the area for more than a certain period of time could be acceptable. Another important point to remember concerning the FCC's exposure guidelines is that they constitute exposure limits (not emission limits), and they are relevant only to locations that are accessible to workers or members of the public. Such access can be restricted or controlled by appropriate means such as the use of fences, warning signs, etc., as noted above. For the case of occupational/controlled exposure, procedures can be instituted for working in the vicinity of RF sources that will prevent exposures in excess of the guidelines. An example of such procedures would be restricting the time an individual could be near an RF source or requiring that work on or near such sources be performed while the transmitter is turned off or while power is appropriately reduced. Qualifications of Reporting Engineer Mr. Wappel has been involved in the analysis of RF emissions since 1999. He has designed numerous RF systems including both site design and RF system design. He is an Electrical Engineer, and all contents of this report are true and correct to the best of his knowledge. Signed: %" Date: 8/30/2010 Evan Wappel, BSc,EE e at&t APPENDIX A Term Definitions Exposure Exposure occurs whenever and wherever a person is subjected to electric, magnetic or electromagnetic fields other than those originating from physiological processes in the body and other natural phenomena. Exposure, partial -body. Partial -body exposure results when RF fields are substantially nonuniform over the body. Fields that are nonuniform over volumes comparable to the human body may occur due to highly directional sources,.standing-waves, re -radiating sources or in the near field. General population/uncontrolled exposure. For FCC purposes, applies to human exposure to RF fields when the general public is exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over'their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public always fall under this category when exposure is not employment-related. Maximum permissible exposure (MPE). The rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane -wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with an ' acceptable safety factor. Occupational/controlled exposure. For FCC purposes, applies to human exposure to RF fields when persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general population/uncontrolled limits (see definition above), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure. and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. e at&t Table 1 LIMITS FOR MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE (MPE) (A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure Frequency. Electric Field Magnetic Field. Power Density Averaging Time Range Strength (E) Strength (H) (S) JE12; IH12 or S (MHz) (V/m) (Alm) (mW/cmc) (minutes) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/0* 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1500 -- -- f/300 6 1500-100,000 -- -- 5 6 (B) Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure Frequency Electric Field Magnetic Field Power Density Averaging Time Range Strength (E) Strength (H) (S) JE12, IH12 or S (MIiz) (V/m) (A/m) (mW/cm2) (minutes) 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.3430 824/f 2.19/f (180/Y)* 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1500 -- -- f/1500 30 1500-100,000 -- -- 1.0 30 f = frequency in MHz *Plane -wave equivalent power density NOTE 1: Occupational/controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment provided those persons are fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Limits for occupational/controlled exposure also apply in situations when an individual is transient through a location where occupational/controlled limits apply provided he or she is made aware of the potential for exposure. NOTE 2: General population/uncontrolled exposures apply in situations in which the general public may be exposed, or in which persons that are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be fully aware of the potential for exposure or can not exercise control over their exposure. 1 Drawing of site layout: sITO 9 Wmly ormay not boa wwy 9L wkw drpi 'mon. YUU wwt�d Hort rely upon K for any PUrpoae�r Ulan (we:ltation to the general lob OOn of ther pemW.6r Cela depidted. Mid Valley Ve and ExTow wnmq "POWY disclaiine -.any liatilfity'for aired {dais a teat saey imr 1mftF&m. • I le/ Jd 1 J4 - I JS 9 2 1.204c 73PM39 Butte County Assessor's. Mop Book 07, Poge 39 WALED BY. PS CREATED on J-20-200) REHM BY OB REY)SED OR 03-07-2007 EFFM7K 2007-08 ROLL Pre Ws Book 44, PwUcn Of P 7I CmWed By Ihs BuBe CountyAssessors O/Rce 93 1.J6Ac PTN. OF SECTION 9, T.22N., R.1 E., . M.D.B. &M. 07-39 40 J6 I 31 1 38 I 39 I 40 I 41 I 42 ( 43 I 44 I 4.1 00 ti I ! All n arc prepored or laocl ty 111 rote wd Im hi�0onardvonc 8o ttrse of M shorn M e As swe rop26XAQS IE RIIDW 17 27 I 18 Ig 25 J2 28 19 23 ROAD ... _ ... I* .3&ic f5 31 1.0?Ac O rate{ zs 24 19 a � 2 .38Ac �� � 20 38Ac � � r 4r 23 20 15 WAS 14 l4 - 30 38Aa € rn.'a 384c r" g g 8 � �8 38Ac ftm 10 l0 11 21 ty 22 2t O O6 7O IJ 4 13 3 BAc r6s4 17 :ae 5 16 .37Ac ^ .46Ac ,39Ac .384c �41 r�� ROAD ... _ ... 2 O o 3 oIt 4 O 5 5 p 7 � 8 � �8 9 � O 10 l0 11 12 o .52Ac .49Ac O O6 7O .' .46Ac .46Ac 43Ac .41Ac .384c 38Ac .38Ac .38Ac .42Ac °! 0.kl! OtN 80.64 71.81 7 NL! ri!I e3.7I U.S. .HIGHWAY 99 E 06-21 WOODSIDE SUBDIVISION NO. 195 72 M.O.R. 45 �41 r�� Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile APPLICATION PACKET FOR USE PERNUT OR MINOR USE PERNUT Applicant Name: '�rT M64-%� C/0 Fw N K &� k64 euc'l Project Number: Kof i o -ow Check One ❑ USE PERMIT ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY SEP 2 1010 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST SERVICES The applicant should discuss the application requirements with Department of Development Services, Public Works and Environmental Health staff prior to preparing this application. Please note that acceptance of your application is not an indication of approval. Application packets with missing components cannot be accepted. Include this checklist along with your submittal. Applicant Pla er I. ❑ Complete a Pre -Application Review with the Environmental Health Division and provide evidence of meeting their requirements for sewage disposal and water supply in one of the following ways: ❑ A pre -application completion letter from Environmental Health ❑ A Willing and Able to Serve Letter from the appropriate utility district ❑ A completed cooperative agreement for annexation into a utility district 2. 13' A completed, signed Project Information Form. 3. a 1 1' A complete Project Setting Description (instructions attached). 4. If the application is signed by an agent for the owner, an agent authorization form must be submitted along with the application. The application cannot be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. 5. ✓ A signed agreement for Butte County Archaeological Resources Project Review by the Northeast Information Center (NEIC) accompanied by its required topographic map and a check in the amount of $75.00 made out to "NEIL". E • Applicant Planr 6. Payment of the currently required Application Fees and/or Deposits. Make checks payable to "Butte County Treasurer". Public Fee Schedule is available under "Fees" at: http://www.buttecounly.net/dds/Planning_/ Additional fees for publication notices will be required prior to issuance of the use permit. Application fees are non-refundable. Applicant's Initials_ 7. A creation document for the project parcel and evidence of current property ownership. . 8. ❑ SITE PLAN: Thirty (30) copies of a site map drawn to standard engineering scale (e.g., 1" = 20'). Additional copies of the map shall be made available to county departments upon request. All maps shall be drawn on uniform size sheets no less than 11"x17" and no greater than 24" X 36", folded to 8 ''/2" x 11". In addition, a digital copy of the map and aerial photographs are encouraged. The detailed man must include: a. ❑ ❑ Name and business address of the applicant, engineer or person who prepared the map. b. ❑ Assessor Parcel Number(s); street address (if available); tract name and date (if applicable); and/or Township, Range and Section numbers. c• ❑ ❑ Proposed use and/or uses of the property. d. ❑ ❑ A vicinity map indicating the location of the land in relation to the nearest major roads and/or significant topographic features in the surrounding area or region. e• ❑ ❑ Property lines, lot dimensions and any applicable easements of record or proposed. f. ❑ ❑ Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed public and private improvements on the property (including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, roads, parking areas, wells, septic tanks, sewer lines, leach fields, utilities, signage, storm drainage systems and lighting. g. ❑ ❑ Location of all water features including, but not limited to, natural and human -made drainage courses, irrigation canals, ponds, creeks, sloughs; topographic features including, but not limited to, buttes, slopes > 30%, rock out-croppings; and existing vegetation, such as oak trees greater than 5" in diameter and agricultural crops. h. ❑ ❑ Distances between any significant natural and constructed features of the property, such as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major tree stands, storm drains, bodies of wafer, railroads, and their relationship to the pro erty lines. I ❑ ❑ Location, height, and materials of walls and fences (sections may be required). ❑ ❑ Internal circulation pattern, if applicable. k• ❑ ❑ Existing fire hydrants within 1000 feet. 1. ❑ ❑ Approximate location of all buildings, wells, septic tanks and leach fields within 100 feet, on adiacent properties. m• ❑ ❑ All driveways,drawn to scale, on properties within 100 feet of the site. n. ❑ ❑ Existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks and road surface widths on-site or on properties within 1.00 feet of the site. o• ❑ ❑ Any existing faults or fractures and geologic hazards. �, 1n .. 2 • • V P- ❑ ❑ Elevation contours, at an appropriate vertical scale. q• ❑ ❑ Indicate at least one route from the property to a publicly -maintained road. r• ❑ ❑ Off-street parking pursuant to county code. s• ❑ ❑ Indicate scale and include a north arrow oriented to the top of the'sheet. t• ❑ ❑ All maps must be clear and legible. Applicant Planner 9. ❑ ❑ Building Elevations ❑ �If applicable, provide a proposed landscaping and irrigation plan on a separate sheet. ❑ If applicable, provide a conceptual grading plan. Items to be shown on the plan include: a. ❑ ❑ Natural areas to be preserved. b. ❑ ❑ Proposed cut and fill areas in contrasting colors or patterns. c. ❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contours at an appropriate vertical scale within the project and on adjacent properties within 100 feet of the project boundaries. t d. ❑ ❑ Proposed drainage and flood control facilities. e. ❑ ❑ - Erosion control measures and best management practices (e.g., - slope landscaping). f. ❑ ❑ Natural drainage. g. ❑ ❑ Location of retaining walls, drainage channels and existing structures.' h. ❑ ❑ Location, elevation and size of proposed building pads. Additional information may be required in order to clarify, correct or supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the iq Department of Development Services; Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. Additiorial fees may be collected for the California Department of., Fish and Game at the time of recording the Notice of Determination as required by Public Resource Code (PRC - section 21089 (b). Please call the Planning Division of the Department of Development Services at (530) 538- 7601 if you have any questions about these requirements. 3 Signature: ` v Applicant/Representative Signature: 11� Planner Receiving Application K:\Planning\FORMS\APPLICATIONS\UsePermit_MinorUP.doe Revised0726/06 4 Date: / l Date: \' 0 DEPARTMENT OF PKH AND GAME http://www.dfg.ca.gov Environmental Review and Permitting 1416 Ninth Street, Suite 1260 Sacramento, California 95814 CEQA Filing Fee No Effect Determination Form Date Submitted: October 26, 2010 Applicant Name: AT&T Mobility, c/o Frank Schabarum Applicant Address: 10615 Quail Hollow Lane, Redding, CA 96003 Project Name: AT&T Mobility — Minor Use Permit CEQA Lead Agency: Butte County Department of Development Services CEQA Document Type: Negative Declaration SCH Number and/or Local agency ID number: MUP10-0001 Project Location: The project site is located at 3415 Silverbell Road, approximately 500 feet south of Eaton Road, Chico. Brief Project Description;. This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to collocate twelve (12) panel antennas at the height of 85 feet and two (2) - 2 -foot diameter microwave antennas below the proposed 12 panel antennas on an existing 120 -foot lattice tower. The 12 panel antennas will be located on 3 sectors (4 per sector). Ground based equipment will be secured within a 12' x 20' lease area. -inside an existing building adjacent to the base of the tower. Other equipment will include eighteen (18) coax cables, three (3) Remote Radio Units and six (6) TMAs secured behind the panel antennas. Butte County Code Section 24-262(d) requires a Minor Use Permit for a collocation on an existing tower it the existing tower or other collocations did not complete an environmental analysis per CEQA. Determination: Please retain this original determination for your records; you are required to file a copy of this determination with the County Clerk after your project is approved and at the time of filing of the CEQA lead agency's Notice of Determination (NOD)._ If you do not file a copy of this determination with the County Clerk at the time of filing of the NOD, the appropriate CEQA filing fee will be due and payable. Without a valid No Effect Determination Form or proof of fee payment, the project will not be operative, vested, or final and any local permits issued for the project will be invalid, pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)(3). Title: Staff Environmental Scientist Date: November 30, 2010 Conserving Caftfornza s Wi%fffe Since 1870 0 0 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT BUTTE COUNTY INITIAL STUDY AND PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR MUP10-0001 (AT&T Mobility) Project Name: Minor Use Permit for ATTMobility, File # MUP10-0001 COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY FOR MINOR USE PERMIT 10-0001 (AT&T Mobility) 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: AT&T Mobility (c/o Frank Schabarum) /John P. & Rebecca J. Rehklau B. Staff Contact: Mark Michelena, Senior Planner (530) 538-7376, mmichelenanue,buttecounty.net C. Project Name: MUP10-0001 D. Project Location: The project site is located at 3415 Silverbell Road, approximately 500 feet south of Eaton Road, Chico. E. Type of Application: Minor Use Permit for collocation of wireless facilities F. Assessor's Parcel Number: APN 007-390-001 G. Project Site Size: Parcel size is +1.22 acres; collocation is proposed on an existing 120 -foot tower occupying a +1,725 square foot lease area. H. Current Zoning: C-2 (General Commercial) Proposed Zoning: CG (General Commercial) I. Current General Plan Designation: C (Commercial) Proposed General Plan Designation: Retail and Office J. Environmental Setting: The project site is located in Chico Urban Area surrounded by State Highway 99 to the west, commercial uses to the north and east, and residential uses to the east and south. The site is developed with three commercial buildings and the 120 -foot lattice tower with three collocations (panel antennas) and ground -related equipment all within the existing western end of one of the existing buildings. Vegetation on the site consists of a few ornamental tress and shrub groundcover. The site is not located within a 100 -year flood zone or an airport land use compatibility zone. The project area is approximately at 175.feet above sea level and generally flat. The tower site is flat. There are no waterways on the project parcel or in the tower site area. The nearest water way is Sycamore Creek, which is located approximately 0.5 miles northeast of the site. Access to the site is from Silverbell Road, a county -maintained paved road. The existing 120 -foot tower, with an additional 10 feet of antennas on top, was constructed by building permit in 1997, sits within a +1,750 square foot lease area developed with the existing tower, three co - locations, and one telecommunications equipment cabinet/shelter within an existing building. The tower lease area is surrounded by a six-foot high chain link fence. The equipment cabinet/shelter is located in the east end of the existing building. K. Surrounding Land Uses: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP 10-0001 ■ Page 1 of 28■ General Plan Designation Zoning Direction Existing Proposed Existin Proposed Existing Land Use(s) North C R& O C-2 R& O Commercial South C/LDR R & O/ MDR C -2/A -SR R & O/ MDR Commercial/Residential East C/LDR R & O/ MDR C -2/A -SR R & O/ MDR Commercial/Residential West Chico Chico Chico City of Chico State Highway 99 ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP 10-0001 ■ Page 1 of 28■ Project Name: Minor Use Permit for ATV Mobility, File # MUPIO-0001 L. Project Description: AT&T Mobility is requesting approval of a minor use permit to collocate and operate a telecommunications facility on an existing 120 -foot tall lattice tower. The project consists of: 1. Mounting of up to three (3) antenna sectors with up to four (4) antennas per sector and two (2), 2 -foot diameter microwave dishes below the panel antennas. a. The panel antennas will be centered at the 85 -foot level. b. The microwave dishes will be centered at the 80 -foot level. 2. One (1) 12 'x 20' equipment area within the existing building. 3. Installation of coax lines and supporting equipment next to the antenna and interior space within.the existing building for ground equipment. As the AT&T Mobility facilities will be located inside the existing fenced area and the existing building, no additional fencing is required. No grading will take place. The existing 120 -foot lattice tower and two of the_ collocations at the 120 -foot and 130 -foot levels were initially placed on the site when communication facilities were allowed as a permitted use in the Commercial zones. The third co -location (MUP 02-03), was approved for nine (9) 5 square foot antennas at the 110 -foot level and " ground mounted equipment. These improvements are located in an approximately ±1,725 square foot leased area. Any future collocation would be required to meet structural requirements of the California Building Code. Minimal traffic will be generated during the estimated construction phase while a crew travels to and from the - site. In its operational phase, the AT&T Mobility project will be unmanned and will not require water, waste treatment or management of hazardous waste. There will be approximately one visit per month by a radio technician for routine maintenance. The site will be in operation 24 hours a day, seven days a week. This request for a Minor Use Permit to allow the collocation of a wireless communications facility is in accordance with Butte County Code Section 24-262(k), which requires certification of an environmental impact report or adoption of a negative or mitigated negative declaration for collocations proposed on towers that have not been subject to previous discretionary and environmental review per the California Environmental Quality Act. M. Public Agency Approvals: Butte County Planning Division, Butte County Building Division, Butte County Fire Department/CDF, Butte County Public Works Department. 2.0 DETERNIINATION [X] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [ ] I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [ ] I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. [ ] I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 2 of 28■ • is Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 [ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Preaared bv: Mark tchelena, Senior Planner Date A Lk- A0 Jolliffe, Principal Planner Date 3.0 POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS CHECKLIST SETTING A. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant. Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [ ] 4.1 Aesthetics [ ] 4.2 Agriculture Resources [ ] 4.3 Air Quality [ ] 4.4 Biological Resources [ ] 4.5 Cultural Resources [ ] 4.6 Geologic Processes [ ] 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions [ ] 4.8 Hazards/Hazardous Material [ ] 4.9 Hydrology/Water Quality [ ] 4.10 Land Use [ ] 4.11 Mineral Resources [ ] 4.12 Noise [ ] 4.13 Housing [ ] 4.14 Public Services [ ] 4.15 Recreation [ ] 4.16 Transportation/Traffic [ ] 4.17 Utilities/Service Systems [ ] 4.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance B. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards, (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on a project -specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP 10-0001 ■ Page 3 of 28■ Project Name: Minor Use Permit for ATTMobility, File # MUP10-0001 5) "Reviewed Under Previous Document." Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 4.1 AESTHETIC/VISUAL RESOURCES: Setting: The project site is located adjacent to the City of Chico in an area characterized by uses of commercial and residential. The project site area is not located within a designated scenic area. The site is developed with three commercial buildings and the 120 -foot lattice tower with three collocations (panel antennas) and ground -related equipment all within ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 4 of 28■ Less Than Reviewed Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Previous Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic X buildings within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views X in the area? Setting: The project site is located adjacent to the City of Chico in an area characterized by uses of commercial and residential. The project site area is not located within a designated scenic area. The site is developed with three commercial buildings and the 120 -foot lattice tower with three collocations (panel antennas) and ground -related equipment all within ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 4 of 28■ Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUPIO-0001 the existing western end of one of the existing buildings. The project site is adjacent to the off ramp of State Highway 99. Impact Discussion: Butte County has not defined significant aesthetic/visual resources within the County; however, the sensitivity of a view and the visual dominance of a project may be used to evaluate impacts to visual resources. The sensitivity of a view is characterized by the visual qualities of both nearby and distant landscapes (e.g., their form, texture, color, massing, and definition) and how development might obscure, contrast with or otherwise affect those visual qualities. In this context, significant visual resources are those viewable from a publicly accessible vantage point (e.g., a road, park, public building) and would include long-distance and/or commanding views of the surrounding countryside, proximate and distinctive landscape features such as streams, trees, rock outcroppings and historic buildings, and the massing of such views and features. Impacts to significant visual resources could result when, for example, development displaces or obscures or intrudes upon such publicly accessible views in a manner that degrades a particular or overall scenic experience from a publicly accessible vantage point. As discussed in Section 1.0 (L.); above, the project consists of installation of three (3) antenna sectors with four (4) antennas per sector and two (2), 2 -foot diameter microwave dishes to be installed on the existing tower. The ground related equipment will be located within one of the existing buildings. The proposed collocation will not increase the height or, substantially, the bulk of the existing tower. a) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed antennas (two to three feet in length), microwave dishes and cables, will almost be imperceptible to passing motorists some 200 feet or more away on Highway 99 and 90 feet from the..off-ramp. The project will have a less than significant impact upon the current vista from either Highway 99 or any other vantage point beyond the project parcel. b) No Impact. The project site is not within a state scenic highway and the project, limited to the addition of relatively small antennas, will not obscure or otherwise damage any scenic resource in the surrounding landscape. C) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed collocation is too small relative to the existing tower and facility to substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings as viewed from Highway 99 or adjacent properties. d) No Impact. No night lighting is proposed for the antennas or equipment cabinets. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.2 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 5 of 28■ Less Than Reviewed Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the X California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or X a Williamson Act Contract? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 5 of 28■ • Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 Setting: The project parcel is located in the Chico Urban Area and is developed with three existing buildings, which are occupied by several businesses, and a paved parking area. The surrounding area includes commercial and residential dwellings. Impact Discussion: The project site is developed with an existing 120 -foot tall communication tower, collocations and related ground equipment, a single-family dwelling and accessory structures. The remainder of the site appears to have been used for row crops or forage, but currently appears to be fallow. Agricultural uses on the surrounding/nearby parcels consist of field crops and orchards. The project neither changes the height of the existing tower nor hosts a regular workforce. As discussed in Section 1.0 (L.), above, the project consists of installation of three (3) antenna sectors with four (4) antennas per sector and two (2), 2 -foot diameter microwave dishes on the existing tower and one (1) 12 'x 20' equipment area within the existing building. The proposed collocation will not increase the height or, substantially, the bulk of the existing tower. a - c) No Impact. Given the site is located in the Chico Urban Area and is developed with three commercial buildings and an existing 120 -foot communication tower with three collocations, and there is no adjacent agricultural use, there will be no impact to agricultural land or uses. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.3 AIR QUALITY: Less Than Reviewed Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Previous Incorporated Document c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in X conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Setting: The project parcel is located in the Chico Urban Area and is developed with three existing buildings, which are occupied by several businesses, and a paved parking area. The surrounding area includes commercial and residential dwellings. Impact Discussion: The project site is developed with an existing 120 -foot tall communication tower, collocations and related ground equipment, a single-family dwelling and accessory structures. The remainder of the site appears to have been used for row crops or forage, but currently appears to be fallow. Agricultural uses on the surrounding/nearby parcels consist of field crops and orchards. The project neither changes the height of the existing tower nor hosts a regular workforce. As discussed in Section 1.0 (L.), above, the project consists of installation of three (3) antenna sectors with four (4) antennas per sector and two (2), 2 -foot diameter microwave dishes on the existing tower and one (1) 12 'x 20' equipment area within the existing building. The proposed collocation will not increase the height or, substantially, the bulk of the existing tower. a - c) No Impact. Given the site is located in the Chico Urban Area and is developed with three commercial buildings and an existing 120 -foot communication tower with three collocations, and there is no adjacent agricultural use, there will be no impact to agricultural land or uses. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.3 AIR QUALITY: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 6 of 28■ Less Than Reviewed Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality X violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient X air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozoneprecursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 6 of 28■ • • Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUPIO-0001 Setting: The project parcel is located in the Chico Urban Area and is developed with three existing buildings, which are occupied by several businesses, and a paved parking area. The surrounding area includes commercial and residential dwellings. Both the California Air Resources Board and the Environmental Protection Agency have established air pollution standards in an effort to protect human health and welfare. Geographic areas are designated "attainment" if these standards are met and "nonattainment" if they are not met. In addition, each agency has several levels of classifications based on severity of the problem. Butte County and all northern Sacramento Valley Air Districts have been designated as "moderate" nonattainment areas for the state standards for ozone (03) and fine particulate matter (PMto). Currently, Butte County is in attainment for all the federal (less stringent) air quality standards. Impact Analysis: AT&T Mobility is requesting approval to collocate and operate a telecommunications facility an existing 120 -foot tall lattice tower. As discussed in Section 1.0 (1.), above, the project includes: Mounting of up to three (3) antenna sectors with up to four (4) antennas per sector and two (2), 2 -foot diameter microwave dishes below the panel antennas. a. The panel antennas will be centered at the 85 -foot level. b. The microwave dishes will be centered at the 80 -foot level. 2. One (1) 12 'x 20' equipment area within the existing building 3. Installation of coax lines and supporting equipment next to the antenna and interior space within the existing building for ground equipment. The project is not expected to create any significant amounts of oxides of nitrogen, or reactive organic gases emissions. The project is not expected to generate any significant amounts of fugitive dust because the will be no soil disturbance due to the collocation being on an existing tower and ground related equipment will be within an existing building. Minor amounts of emissions would be generated by construction equipment during site development activities, but this would be insignificant because of the limited amount of construction equipment and time needed to install the extension, antennas, and equipment cabinets. The limited scope of the project's construction and operational phases will have no impact upon any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. a) No Impact. Due to its limited construction and operational scope, the project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. b) Less Than Significant Impact. Minor amounts of emissions would be generated by construction equipment during site development activities, but this would be insignificant because of the limited amount of construction equipment and time needed to install the extension, antennas, and ground equipment. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study —AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 7 of 28■ Less Than Reviewed Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial X number of people? Setting: The project parcel is located in the Chico Urban Area and is developed with three existing buildings, which are occupied by several businesses, and a paved parking area. The surrounding area includes commercial and residential dwellings. Both the California Air Resources Board and the Environmental Protection Agency have established air pollution standards in an effort to protect human health and welfare. Geographic areas are designated "attainment" if these standards are met and "nonattainment" if they are not met. In addition, each agency has several levels of classifications based on severity of the problem. Butte County and all northern Sacramento Valley Air Districts have been designated as "moderate" nonattainment areas for the state standards for ozone (03) and fine particulate matter (PMto). Currently, Butte County is in attainment for all the federal (less stringent) air quality standards. Impact Analysis: AT&T Mobility is requesting approval to collocate and operate a telecommunications facility an existing 120 -foot tall lattice tower. As discussed in Section 1.0 (1.), above, the project includes: Mounting of up to three (3) antenna sectors with up to four (4) antennas per sector and two (2), 2 -foot diameter microwave dishes below the panel antennas. a. The panel antennas will be centered at the 85 -foot level. b. The microwave dishes will be centered at the 80 -foot level. 2. One (1) 12 'x 20' equipment area within the existing building 3. Installation of coax lines and supporting equipment next to the antenna and interior space within the existing building for ground equipment. The project is not expected to create any significant amounts of oxides of nitrogen, or reactive organic gases emissions. The project is not expected to generate any significant amounts of fugitive dust because the will be no soil disturbance due to the collocation being on an existing tower and ground related equipment will be within an existing building. Minor amounts of emissions would be generated by construction equipment during site development activities, but this would be insignificant because of the limited amount of construction equipment and time needed to install the extension, antennas, and equipment cabinets. The limited scope of the project's construction and operational phases will have no impact upon any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. a) No Impact. Due to its limited construction and operational scope, the project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. b) Less Than Significant Impact. Minor amounts of emissions would be generated by construction equipment during site development activities, but this would be insignificant because of the limited amount of construction equipment and time needed to install the extension, antennas, and ground equipment. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study —AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 7 of 28■ 9 0 Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 c -e) Less Thank Significant Impact. The limited scope of the project's construction and operational phases, the project will have a less than significant impact upon any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 8 of 28■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No Reviewed Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Im pact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status X species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and X regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 or the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, X vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means)? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish and wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory X wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree X reservation policy ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat X conservationplan? g. A reduction in the numbers, a restriction in the range, or an impact to the critical habitat of any unique, rare, X threatened, or endangered species of animals? h. A reduction in the diversity or numbers of animals onsite (including mammals, birds, reptiles, X amphibians, fish or invertebrates)? L A deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat (for X foraging, breeding, roosting, nesting, etc.)? j. Introduction of barriers to movement of any resident X or migratory fish or wildlife species? k. Introduction of any factors (light, fencing, noise, human presence and/or domestic animals) which could X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 8 of 28■ 0 9 Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 Setting: The ±1.22 acre, rectangular -shaped project site is in the Chico Urban Area and Chico Sphere of Influence within the unincorporated area of Butte County. The project site is located on the valley floor and is surrounded by commercial uses to the north, south and east, residential uses to the south and east, and State Highway 99 to the west. The project parcel itself is developed with three existing buildings, which are occupied by several businesses, the 120 -foot tower (with three existing collocations) and a paved parking area. The site is not located within a 100 - year flood zone. There are no waterways on the project parcel or in the tower site area. The nearest water way is Sycamore Creek, which is located approximately 0.5 miles northeast of the site. Access to the site is from Silverbell Road, a county -maintained paved road. The final Landcover map prepared for the proposed Butte County Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Communities Conservation Plan (Butte County Association of Governments, 2008) identifies the parcel, and surrounding area as urban. There are no identified constraints on the parcel, or surrounding area. Vegetation on the site consists of a few ornamental: tress and shrub groundcover. The project parcel does not contain wetlands, vernal pools, drainages oak trees or other significant biological resources. Review for special status species occurrences in the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) within one mile of the project parcel identified the following: Special Status Species Occurrences in the vicinity of the Project Site Less Than Reviewed Approximate Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Federal Impact Mitigation Impact adobe -lily Fritillaria pluriflora Document None 1B.2 Incorporated Butte County Limnanthes floccosa hinder the normal activities of wildlife? meadowfoam ssp. californica Endangered Endangered 113.1 Setting: The ±1.22 acre, rectangular -shaped project site is in the Chico Urban Area and Chico Sphere of Influence within the unincorporated area of Butte County. The project site is located on the valley floor and is surrounded by commercial uses to the north, south and east, residential uses to the south and east, and State Highway 99 to the west. The project parcel itself is developed with three existing buildings, which are occupied by several businesses, the 120 -foot tower (with three existing collocations) and a paved parking area. The site is not located within a 100 - year flood zone. There are no waterways on the project parcel or in the tower site area. The nearest water way is Sycamore Creek, which is located approximately 0.5 miles northeast of the site. Access to the site is from Silverbell Road, a county -maintained paved road. The final Landcover map prepared for the proposed Butte County Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Communities Conservation Plan (Butte County Association of Governments, 2008) identifies the parcel, and surrounding area as urban. There are no identified constraints on the parcel, or surrounding area. Vegetation on the site consists of a few ornamental: tress and shrub groundcover. The project parcel does not contain wetlands, vernal pools, drainages oak trees or other significant biological resources. Review for special status species occurrences in the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) within one mile of the project parcel identified the following: Special Status Species Occurrences in the vicinity of the Project Site Approximate Species Name Distance from Project Site Common Name Scientific Name Federal State CNPS feet adobe -lily Fritillaria pluriflora None None 1B.2 0 to 3,700 Butte County Limnanthes floccosa meadowfoam ssp. californica Endangered Endangered 113.1 4,300 to 5,200 California linderiella Linderiella occidentalis None None 2,500 burrowing owl Athene cunicularia None None 3,700 to 4,000 vernal pool tadpole shrimp Le idurus packardi 1 Endangered 1 None 1 1 2,900 to 4,600 Source: California Natural Diversity Database, Rarefind, October 2008 The project site is located on the fringes of the Sacramento Valley, which is habitat for Swainson's hawk (Buteo swainsoni). The Swainson's hawk is a State -listed Threatened species (California Department of Fish and Game, State and Federally Listed Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Plants of California, October 2008). Impact Discussion: a -d) No Impact. Due to its small size within the already developed and fenced lease area, the project will have no substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The immediate lease area does not contain jurisdictional waters, and the project is simply too small to have any impact upon the limited riparian habitat that may exist along the seasonal drainage to west. The project will not disturb any Swainson's hawk nesting site because none are known to be located on the project site or in the immediate project area. The nearest Swainson's hawk nest is located approximately 6.1 miles from the project site. The project would ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ m Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 9 of 28■ Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 not have an impact on Swainson's hawk foraging habitat because the proposed project would not increase the height of the existing tower and would not require any additional area outside of the already graded and graveled lease area. The equipment cabinets and collocated antennas will have no impact upon the movement of any native resident or migratory fish and wildlife species, established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or the use of native wildlife nursery sites. e -f) No Impact. Butte County has a policy to mitigate losses of certain oak trees due to development impacts. In this instance, however, no oaks will be affected in any way by the project. Although a Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan is under consideration by the Butte County Association of Governments, it has not been implemented. g -i) No Impact. The paved and developed lease area does not contain vernal pool, wetlands, sensitive plant or sensitive species. Similarly, Swainson's hawk and other birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1913 may be in the vicinity of the project. However, given the project's small scope, it will have no impact upon the numbers, range, or critical habitat of any. unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of animals. j -k) No Impact. The project is a co -location on an existing tower and additional ground equipment in a ±1,725 square foot leased area within an existing building. No additional introduction of barriers to movement of any resident or wildlife species will occur. No additional lighting will be added to the tower or to the existing building that will store the ground equipment. The co -location will have no impact. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES: Setting: The 1983 Butte County Archaeological Sensitivity Map shows the project parcel to be within an area of moderate to low (including unknown) archaeological sensitivity. Prehistoric resources sites are also found in foothill areas with high bluffs and rock outcroppings overlooking deer migratory corridors, and above bodies of water. The project site is located on the valley floor and is surrounded by urban development, such as commercial and residential, along with State Highway 99. Impact Discussion: Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic period archaeological sites, historical features and consist of any human -made site, object (i.e., artifact), or feature that defines and illuminates our past, such as rock walls, water ditches, flumes, cemeteries and architectural features. An impact to such cultural resources would occur were they ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 10 of 28■ Potentially Less Than ' Significant Less Than Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant with Significant No Impact Under Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated. a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? X b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? X c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Setting: The 1983 Butte County Archaeological Sensitivity Map shows the project parcel to be within an area of moderate to low (including unknown) archaeological sensitivity. Prehistoric resources sites are also found in foothill areas with high bluffs and rock outcroppings overlooking deer migratory corridors, and above bodies of water. The project site is located on the valley floor and is surrounded by urban development, such as commercial and residential, along with State Highway 99. Impact Discussion: Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic period archaeological sites, historical features and consist of any human -made site, object (i.e., artifact), or feature that defines and illuminates our past, such as rock walls, water ditches, flumes, cemeteries and architectural features. An impact to such cultural resources would occur were they ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 10 of 28■ • • Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUPI 0-0001 to be disturbed by either surface or sub -surface construction. No cultural resources structures or sites of any type are known to be located on the fenced +1,725 square foot lease area. a -d) No Impact. Per Section 15064.5(b) of the California Code of Regulations, substantial adverse change occurs when a project results in the physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of a cultural resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of the resource would be materially impaired. This project consists of the installation of co -locations of panel antennas and microwave dishes on the existing tower and ground equipment within an existing building. No earthwork would be needed as part of the project. The construction and the post -construction operational phases will both take place within the existing ±1,725 square foot fenced area and existing building. Mitigation Measures: None required. 4.6 GEOLOGIC PROCESSES: Setting: The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan (1977) notes that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII; although local intensities could vary from Zone VII to Zone IX (California Division of Mines and Geology, 1995). The project site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake fault zone or an aftershock zone and the only known active fault in Butte County - the Cleveland Hill fault — is located approximately 29.7 miles to the southeast of the project site (where, on August 1, 1975, the Richter magnitude 5.7 ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study— AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 11 of 28■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No Reviewed Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as X delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? X 3. Seismic -related ground failure, including X liquefaction? 4. Landslides? X b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, X and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1- B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating X substantial risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal X system where sewers are not available for the disposal or wastewater? Setting: The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan (1977) notes that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII; although local intensities could vary from Zone VII to Zone IX (California Division of Mines and Geology, 1995). The project site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake fault zone or an aftershock zone and the only known active fault in Butte County - the Cleveland Hill fault — is located approximately 29.7 miles to the southeast of the project site (where, on August 1, 1975, the Richter magnitude 5.7 ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study— AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 11 of 28■ Project Name: Minor Use Permit for ATTMobility, File # MUP10-0001 i Oroville earthquake resulted in approximately 2.2 miles of ground rupture along the western flank of Cleveland Hill). Butte County GIS Fault Lines data (California Division of Mines and Geology, 1995) shows a parallel series of inferred faults approximately 0.8 to 3 miles east of the project site. Like much of tectonically active California, the site will likely be subjected to seismic ground shaking at some future time. Butte County GIS data (CA Division of Mines and Geology 1995) shows the project site to be in an area with a generally moderate potential for liquefaction, a low to none potential for land sliding, and a no potential for erosion. Soil expansiveness is moderate. Impact Discussion: An impact related to geologic processes would occur if the project was susceptible to seismically -induced ground failure or in some way induced ground movement that caused the structure to collapse or otherwise cause harm. AT&T Mobility is requesting approval to collocate and operate a telecommunications facility on an existing 120 -foot tall lattice tower. As discussed in Section 1.0 (I.) above, the panel antennas will be centered at the 85 -foot level, while the microwave dishes will be centered at the 80 -foot level, above the ground. The construction and the post -construction operational phases will both take place within the existing +1,725 square foot fenced area and within the existing building The minor amount of weight added onto the tower by the proposed collocation must be analyzed for structural safety per the Uniform Building Code by both the applicant's engineer and, as part of the building permit process, by the Butte County Building Division. al -4) No Impact. The project site is not within or near an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone and will not be subject to strong seismic ground shaking, seismic -related liquefaction or landsliding. b) No Impact. The project site is within an area with no potential for soil erosion. The project does not involve any soil disturbance with the connecting the coax cables the equipment cabinets inside the existing building. The project would have no impact upon soil erosion. c -d) No Impact. The project site is not on land susceptible to landsliding or seismically -induced ground failure, nor is it on expansive soils. e) No Impact. The project does not involve a septic disposal system. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 12 of 28■ Less Than Reviewed Would the proposal: Potentially Significant Less Than Under Significant with Significant Previous - Impact Mitigation Impact No Document Incorporated Impact a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or X indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation X adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 12 of 28■ Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUPIO-0001 Setting: The project site is located adjacent to the City of Chico in an area characterized by commercial and residential uses.. The project site area is not located within a designated scenic area. The site is developed with three commercial buildings and the 120 -foot lattice tower with three collocations (panel antennas) and ground related equipment all within the existing western end of one of the existing buildings. Impact Discussion: Section 15064.4 of the CEQA Guidelines sets forth guidance for determining the significance of Impacts from Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The guidelines allow impacts from a particular project to be described quantitatively or qualitatively and direct that impacts should be evaluated in consideration of existing environmental setting, applicable thresholds of significance, and compliance with regulations and requirements adopted to implement the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. Section 15064 (h)(3)of the CEQA Guidelines specifies that a project's contribution to a cumulative effect may be found ,not cumulatively considerable' if the project will comply with the requirements in a previously approved plan or mitigation program, including plans or regulations for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Butte County has not adopted a plan or mitigation program for the reduction of greenhouse gases as of the publication of this study. Likewise, it has not adopted thresholds of significance for evaluating greenhouse gas emissions. This section evaluates greenhouse gas emissions relative to the existing environmental setting and compliance with air quality regulations relative to automobile emissions, the primary contributor to greenhouse gas emissions from the proposed project. a - b) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed MUP could allow collocation and operation of a telecommunications facility on an existing 120 -foot tall lattice tower. The proposed ground equipment will be located within an existing building. No ground disturbance will occur as a result of the project. There will be minimal traffic generated by the project. The increase will be during construction, which will be short-term in duration (four to six weeks) and during the anticipated maintenance (twice a month). Based on a negligible contribution to overall emissions and consistency with adopted air quality regulations for vehicle emissions, the project will have a cumulatively insignificant impact on greenhouse gas emissions. Mitigation: None required 4.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial. Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 13 of 28■ Less Than Reviewed Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environmental through the routine transport use, or X disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous X materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- X quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, X would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial. Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 13 of 28■ Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 Setting: The project would occur in a commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing ±1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a±1.22 -acre parcel. The project parcel also includes other commercial uses within the three existing buildings. There are no hazardous waste sites in the vicinity of the project site. Impact Discussion: An impact related to hazards and hazardous materials might occur if a project is in some way involved with the use, transport or storage of a hazardous material, or if it had potential to be in the way of a hazard such as wildfire, or be a hazard to some other activity such as air flight. a -d) Less than Significant. The project site is not located on or near any sources of hazardous materials. According to the applicant's Radio Frequency Emissions Compliance Report, the proposed collocation facilities would comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) maximum permissible exposure limits and are within the FCC's uncontrolled limits. The Radio Frequency Analysis states that AT&T Mobility fields at ground level are 0.24% of the existing FCC standard guidelines for general population uncontrolled exposure. The site is not listed on any lists of hazardous materials sites. e -h) No Impact. The project site is not located within the 65 or 70 CNEL noise contour of any airport, nor is it located in any aircraft overflight area. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention (CDF) reviewed this project and have required no conditions of approval. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study —AT&T Mobility MUP 10-0001 ■ Page 14 of 28■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No Reviewed Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the X project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? E For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people X residing or working in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency X evacuationplan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or X where residences are intermixed with willdlands? Setting: The project would occur in a commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing ±1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a±1.22 -acre parcel. The project parcel also includes other commercial uses within the three existing buildings. There are no hazardous waste sites in the vicinity of the project site. Impact Discussion: An impact related to hazards and hazardous materials might occur if a project is in some way involved with the use, transport or storage of a hazardous material, or if it had potential to be in the way of a hazard such as wildfire, or be a hazard to some other activity such as air flight. a -d) Less than Significant. The project site is not located on or near any sources of hazardous materials. According to the applicant's Radio Frequency Emissions Compliance Report, the proposed collocation facilities would comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) maximum permissible exposure limits and are within the FCC's uncontrolled limits. The Radio Frequency Analysis states that AT&T Mobility fields at ground level are 0.24% of the existing FCC standard guidelines for general population uncontrolled exposure. The site is not listed on any lists of hazardous materials sites. e -h) No Impact. The project site is not located within the 65 or 70 CNEL noise contour of any airport, nor is it located in any aircraft overflight area. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention (CDF) reviewed this project and have required no conditions of approval. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study —AT&T Mobility MUP 10-0001 ■ Page 14 of 28■ Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUPI 0-0001 4.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Setting: The project would occur in a commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing ±1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a±1.22 -acre parcel. The project parcel also includes other commercial uses within the three existing buildings. The project site is not in a 100 -year flood area. Impact Discussion: The project does not propose any additional impervious surfaces. The project will include a collocation on the existing tower and ground related equipment will be within an existing building. a -Il) No Impact. The project does not require the use of water and would not create any water discharges. The project would not create any significant amounts of soil erosion which in turn could cause water quality ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 15 of 28■ Less Than Reviewed Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production X rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course X of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or X amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage X systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g. Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped by Federal Flood Hazard Boundary, Flood X Insurance Rate Map, or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures X which would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as X a result of the failure of a levee or dam? J. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Setting: The project would occur in a commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing ±1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a±1.22 -acre parcel. The project parcel also includes other commercial uses within the three existing buildings. The project site is not in a 100 -year flood area. Impact Discussion: The project does not propose any additional impervious surfaces. The project will include a collocation on the existing tower and ground related equipment will be within an existing building. a -Il) No Impact. The project does not require the use of water and would not create any water discharges. The project would not create any significant amounts of soil erosion which in turn could cause water quality ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 15 of 28■ 1 • Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 impacts. No water courses, including wetlands or vernal pools, are located in the vicinity of the existing ±1,725 square foot lease area. g -j) No Impact. The project site is not located within any flood zone as shown on the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map 06007C -0340C, dated June 8, 1998. The property is not located in an area prone to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact would occur with respect to these natural hazards. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.10 LAND USE: Setting: The project site is located adjacent to the City of Chico in an area characterized by commercial and residential uses. The project site area is not located within a designated scenic area. The site is developed with three commercial buildings and the 120 -foot lattice tower with three collocations (panel antennas) and ground related equipment all within the existing western end of one of the existing buildings. The project parcel is adjacent to the off ramp of State Highway 99. It is within the Chico Sphere of Influence and Chico Urban Area as designated by the Local Agency Formation Commission. Impact Discussion: As discussed in Section 1.0 (L.), above, collocations on existing towers in the C-2 zone require a minor use permit if an environmental document was not approved for either the tower itself or a previous collocation on the tower that included consideration of future collocations. The Planning Commission reviews the proposal and will grant a Minor Use Permit if: "That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this ordinance [article], the purpose of the zone in which the site is. located, the Butte County general plan, and the development policies and standards of the county"; "That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with and will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources"; and "That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with and will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources." (Butte County Code, Section 24-45.10). ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP 10-0001 ■ Page 16 of 28■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant with Significant No Impact Under Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Physically divide an established community? X b. Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning X ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation lan? X Setting: The project site is located adjacent to the City of Chico in an area characterized by commercial and residential uses. The project site area is not located within a designated scenic area. The site is developed with three commercial buildings and the 120 -foot lattice tower with three collocations (panel antennas) and ground related equipment all within the existing western end of one of the existing buildings. The project parcel is adjacent to the off ramp of State Highway 99. It is within the Chico Sphere of Influence and Chico Urban Area as designated by the Local Agency Formation Commission. Impact Discussion: As discussed in Section 1.0 (L.), above, collocations on existing towers in the C-2 zone require a minor use permit if an environmental document was not approved for either the tower itself or a previous collocation on the tower that included consideration of future collocations. The Planning Commission reviews the proposal and will grant a Minor Use Permit if: "That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this ordinance [article], the purpose of the zone in which the site is. located, the Butte County general plan, and the development policies and standards of the county"; "That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with and will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources"; and "That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with and will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources." (Butte County Code, Section 24-45.10). ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP 10-0001 ■ Page 16 of 28■ Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUPIO-0001 • Based on the project is located in a commercial zone, that the existing tower already includes three collocations, the new ground equipment will be located within an existing building and the parcel is adjacent to State Highway 99, the project will be compatible with and will not adversely affect surrounding uses. Based on this Initial Study, review by the Planning Commission, and information from planning staff and the applicant confirm compliance with all land use plans and policies. The proposed project would not impair the health, welfare, or safety of Butte County residents. a -c) No Impact. The proposed collocation would not divide a community or conflict with a land use plan, policy or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the project. The property is not within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact with regards to land use would occur. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.11 MINERAL RESOURCES: Setting: The project would occur in a commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing +1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a ±1.22 -acre parcel. The project parcel also includes other commercial uses within the three existing buildings. There are no known mineral deposits or aggregate resources in the project area. Impact Discussion: a -b) No Impact. The proposed project would not use or extract any mineral or energy resources and would not restrict access to known mineral resource areas. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.12 NOISE: Less Than Reviewed Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the X residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local X general plan, specific plan, or other land useplan? Setting: The project would occur in a commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing +1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a ±1.22 -acre parcel. The project parcel also includes other commercial uses within the three existing buildings. There are no known mineral deposits or aggregate resources in the project area. Impact Discussion: a -b) No Impact. The proposed project would not use or extract any mineral or energy resources and would not restrict access to known mineral resource areas. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.12 NOISE: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 17 of 28■ Less Than Reviewed Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with ' Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan X or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 17 of 28■ 1 • Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 Setting: The project would occur in a commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing +1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a 11.22 -acre parcel. The project parcel also includes other commercial uses within the three existing buildings. The nearest dwellings are approximately 180 feet to the southeast. Impact Discussion: Butte County does not have a noise ordinance. However, a noise -related impact could occur if construction or operation of a project resulted in temporary, episodic or permanent levels of noise exceeding the normally consistent threshold of 60 decibels established by Butte County's Noise Element. a -c) No Impact. The limited amounts of noise would be generated during the anticipated 30 to 45 days of work to install the antennas and ground mounted equipment, which would be temporary in nature. No ground generator or other machinery creating noise is proposed as a part of this project. There would be no impact to the nearest residence located 180 feet to the southeast. d) Less Than Significant Impact. Limited amounts of noise would be generated during installation of the antennas, coax lines and the ground equipment in the existing building. The project would require limited use of heavy equipment to bring in the equipment and install the antennas. There would be a less than significant impact to the nearby residences and adjacent commercial business due to the short -tem nature of construction activities. e -f) No Impact. The nearest airport to the project site is the Chico Municipal Airport, approximately 1.4 miles to the northeast. There would be no impacts related to an airport or air flight pattern. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 18 of 28■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant with Significant No Impact Under Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? X c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing X without theproject? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above X levels existing without theproject? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, X would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working X in the project area to excessive noise levels? Setting: The project would occur in a commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing +1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a 11.22 -acre parcel. The project parcel also includes other commercial uses within the three existing buildings. The nearest dwellings are approximately 180 feet to the southeast. Impact Discussion: Butte County does not have a noise ordinance. However, a noise -related impact could occur if construction or operation of a project resulted in temporary, episodic or permanent levels of noise exceeding the normally consistent threshold of 60 decibels established by Butte County's Noise Element. a -c) No Impact. The limited amounts of noise would be generated during the anticipated 30 to 45 days of work to install the antennas and ground mounted equipment, which would be temporary in nature. No ground generator or other machinery creating noise is proposed as a part of this project. There would be no impact to the nearest residence located 180 feet to the southeast. d) Less Than Significant Impact. Limited amounts of noise would be generated during installation of the antennas, coax lines and the ground equipment in the existing building. The project would require limited use of heavy equipment to bring in the equipment and install the antennas. There would be a less than significant impact to the nearby residences and adjacent commercial business due to the short -tem nature of construction activities. e -f) No Impact. The nearest airport to the project site is the Chico Municipal Airport, approximately 1.4 miles to the northeast. There would be no impacts related to an airport or air flight pattern. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 18 of 28■ Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 4.13 HOUSING: Setting: The project would occur in a commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing +1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a ±1.22 -acre parcel. The project parcel also includes other commercial uses within the three existing buildings. The nearest dwellings are approximately 180 feet to the southeast. Impact Discussion: a -c) No Impact. The project bears no relation to housing and would not affect the population of the area or displace individuals or housing. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.14 PUBLIC SERVICES: Less Than Reviewed Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and X businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure? X b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing X elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating X the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Setting: The project would occur in a commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing +1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a ±1.22 -acre parcel. The project parcel also includes other commercial uses within the three existing buildings. The nearest dwellings are approximately 180 feet to the southeast. Impact Discussion: a -c) No Impact. The project bears no relation to housing and would not affect the population of the area or displace individuals or housing. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.14 PUBLIC SERVICES: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study —AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 19 of 28■ Less Than Reviewed Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Imact p Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which X could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services? b. Fireprotection? X c. Police Protection? X d. Schools? X e. Parks? X f. Other public services? X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study —AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 19 of 28■ • • Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 Setting: The project would occur in a commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing +1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a±1.22 -acre parcel. The project parcel also includes other commercial uses within the three existing buildings. Impact Discussion: a) No Impact. The proposed collocation is not associated in any way with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities. b) Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is located within the Local Responsibility Area (LRA) with fire protection services provided by the Butte County Fire Department (who had no objections, comments or conditions regarding the project). Given its small size, the project would not increase the level of fire service needed on the site. c -i) No Impact. The project site is under the jurisdiction of the Butte County Sherriffs Department and, given its small size and the already existing facility, no increased police protection would be necessary. The project bears no relation to demand for schools or parks or other public services. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.15 RECREATION: Setting: The project would occur in a commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing +1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a± 1.22 -acre parcel. Impact Discussion: a -b) No Impact. No recreational facilities are proposed under this proposal. No impacts on existing or future recreational facilities would occur. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 20 of 28m Less Than Reviewed Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Previous Incorporated Document a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility X would occur or be accelerated? b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the X environment? Setting: The project would occur in a commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing +1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a± 1.22 -acre parcel. Impact Discussion: a -b) No Impact. No recreational facilities are proposed under this proposal. No impacts on existing or future recreational facilities would occur. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 20 of 28m • • Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 4.16 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Setting: The project would occur in a commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing ±1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a ±1.22 -acre parcel. Impact Discussion: Vehicles access to the site would be from Silverbell Road, a county -maintained paved road. As discussed in the Project Description (see Section 1.0 (L.)), above, aside from the service visits, approximately twice a month, the facility will be unmanned. a) Less than Significant Impact. The project would induce only a minor increase in traffic. The increase will be during construction and during the twice monthly service. b) No Impact. The project will not have a cumulatively considerable impact on traffic. The project's addition of construction traffic and two potential service visits per month will have a negligible effect on cumulative traffic. C) No Impact. The project collocation and ground facilities would have no effect upon air traffic patterns. d -f) Less than Significant Impact. The project applicant anticipates approximately two maintenance trip per month to the facility. Silverbell Road is a county -maintained road with adequate site distance for ingress and egress to the project parcel. Adequate on -street parking exists to serve the project. g) No Impact. Butte County has no alternative transportation plans or policies and, regardless, the project would not create demand for such forms of transportation. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MLIP10-0001 ■ Page 21 of 28■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No Reviewed Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in X either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion X management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in X location that results in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or X incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergent access? X E Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g. Conflict with accepted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e,g., bus X turnouts, bicycle racks)? Setting: The project would occur in a commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing ±1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a ±1.22 -acre parcel. Impact Discussion: Vehicles access to the site would be from Silverbell Road, a county -maintained paved road. As discussed in the Project Description (see Section 1.0 (L.)), above, aside from the service visits, approximately twice a month, the facility will be unmanned. a) Less than Significant Impact. The project would induce only a minor increase in traffic. The increase will be during construction and during the twice monthly service. b) No Impact. The project will not have a cumulatively considerable impact on traffic. The project's addition of construction traffic and two potential service visits per month will have a negligible effect on cumulative traffic. C) No Impact. The project collocation and ground facilities would have no effect upon air traffic patterns. d -f) Less than Significant Impact. The project applicant anticipates approximately two maintenance trip per month to the facility. Silverbell Road is a county -maintained road with adequate site distance for ingress and egress to the project parcel. Adequate on -street parking exists to serve the project. g) No Impact. Butte County has no alternative transportation plans or policies and, regardless, the project would not create demand for such forms of transportation. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MLIP10-0001 ■ Page 21 of 28■ Project Name: Minor Use Permit for ATOMobility, File # MUPIO-0001 • 4.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Setting: The project would occur in a. commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing +1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a ±1.22 -acre parcel. Impact Discussion: An impact upon utilities and service systems might occur if a project exceeded the available service capacity of any such utility or system that happened to serve it. a -b) No Impact. The proposed project would not use any water or generate any wastewater and thus would not have an impact on any wastewater or water treatment facilities. c -e) No Impact. No off-site storm water drainage improvements would be required due to development of the project site. The project will not require water, or a determination by a wastewater provider. f -g) No Impact. The project would not generate any waste and would have no impact on the capacity of the Neal Road Landfill. No impact would occur with respect to federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Mitieation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study = AT&T Mobility MUP 10-0001 ■ Page 22 of 28■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No Reviewed Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water QualityControl Board? X b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could X cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause X significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements X needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the X project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? E Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste X disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes, and regulations related to solid waste? X Setting: The project would occur in a. commercial area adjacent to the City of Chico and State Highway 99, on an existing tower within the existing +1,725 square foot fenced area and in an existing building, on a ±1.22 -acre parcel. Impact Discussion: An impact upon utilities and service systems might occur if a project exceeded the available service capacity of any such utility or system that happened to serve it. a -b) No Impact. The proposed project would not use any water or generate any wastewater and thus would not have an impact on any wastewater or water treatment facilities. c -e) No Impact. No off-site storm water drainage improvements would be required due to development of the project site. The project will not require water, or a determination by a wastewater provider. f -g) No Impact. The project would not generate any waste and would have no impact on the capacity of the Neal Road Landfill. No impact would occur with respect to federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Mitieation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study = AT&T Mobility MUP 10-0001 ■ Page 22 of 28■ • • Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 4.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (SECTION 15065): Due to its small scale, limited construction period and an existing, developed project site, the project does not have the potential to contribute impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable with respect to Initial Study Checklist. No mitigations are required. 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: No mitigations are required. 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL: 1. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County GIS Data. Oroville, CA: November 2007. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 1114, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV -1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 23 of 28■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No Reviewed Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal X community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history orprehistory? b. Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection X with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects)? c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human X beings, either directly or indirectly? Due to its small scale, limited construction period and an existing, developed project site, the project does not have the potential to contribute impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable with respect to Initial Study Checklist. No mitigations are required. 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: No mitigations are required. 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL: 1. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County GIS Data. Oroville, CA: November 2007. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 1114, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV -1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 23 of 28■ • 0 Project Name: Minor Use Pennit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUPIO.0001 10. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, I977. 1. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map l 11-1, Safety Element. Oroville, CA CH2M Hill, 1977. 12. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1989. 13. California Department of Fish & Game. California Natural Diversity Data Base, Rarefind, October 2008. 14. Butte County Planning Department. MUP 01-05 Agenda Report. October 12, 2000 15. Butte County Planning Department. MUP 04-02 Agenda Report. January 7, 2004 16. Butte County Planning Department. Zoning Code Section 24-262 Wireless Ordinance. February 13, 2007. 7.0 CONSULTED AGENCIES: [X] Environmental Health [X] Public Works [ j BCAG ( ] ALUC [ J Assessor [ ] Development Services [ ] Air Qual. Management Dist. [ ] City of Chico [ ] City of Gridley [ ] City of Oroville (Xj Cal Fire/BC Fire Dept [ ] Caltrans (Traffic) [ ] Department of Conservation ( ] CA Dept. of Fish and Game [ ] Army Corps of Engineers [ ] US Fish & Wldlife Service [ J Butte Co. Farm Bureau [ ] Oroville Union School Dist. [ j El Medio Fire Dept. [ ] SFWPA [ ] PG&E ( ) Pacific Bell [ ) Animal Control [ ] County Counsel 8.0 PROJECT SPONSOR(S): Building Manager LAFCo Chico Unified School Distr. City of Biggs Town of Paradise Central Reg. Water Quality Highway Patrol Agricultural Commissioner Feather River Rec. Dist. LOAPUD Palermo Union School Dist. We have reviewed the Initial Study for the AT&T Mobility (c% Frank Schabarum) Minor Use Permit MUP10-0001 (APN 007-390-001) application. c,Gau- �6 8/,70 Project Sponsor/Proje t Agent Date Project Sponsor/Project Agent Date GVROJECTS - APPLICATIONSIMUPIAT&T Mobility - MUP10-0001\Planning Commission\MUP10-0001 AT&T Mobility Intial Study - Negative Deelaration.doc ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP 10-0001 ■ Page 24 of 28■ Project Name: Minor Use Permit for A Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 IL ii Project Site ` rJO Aerial Photo — 2009 9 I t� t •wtte !s E Eaton Rd FA- SR m Gty of Chico r� E Eaton Rd — --�-- G2 i • �' Q, oasioo �n.�\. \ f Project Site / f / City of Chico / d s Zoning ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 25 of 28■ • • Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 m•.no-.,� J RA ' oda ®07,'+:7«,`.�4:�i0 (�Pd'a•�",�!k9�b: 10 0 KIR -fl,I "L e amu • O ) I u� - l{'�gp +.aw Oi i O .ter o..�mwuo.na ! 1 VaW rr e..r� my n. msn re wum �p r uca �cw osn — yT� vF awoai� f' o on O Y 4 t CM aBA'O=BLO 4 0 e 4 6 I CXMBANxiD .n dNE9YA �u I I R[VATpII [�Anwn A-3 EAST ELEvAnON wu �.� ) A-2 NORTHWEST ELEVATION 2 soLRHWEsT ELEvAnON Qo V.�ro m•.no-.,� J F?A 0 KIR ...w O ) I VaW f' o on t CM aBA'O=BLO .n �u I I R[VATpII A-3 EAST ELEvAnON wu �.� ) Elevations ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 26 of 28■ Prpject Name: Minor Use Permit for AT Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 t . k 7 _ �. ! i/• �• JL ;�� :`►� -^ ����:_ 'r . �, .moi .. .. A. ,.� '�"%� ���" � '"fir '�•f, 1001 ILA Chico Bank Bldg 3415 Silverbell Rood Chto% CA 96M aW ^�\� I-� err .f '� �1^v�p •v 7I 'fir r >,,� ,.* .j • Phyto Simulation - Key Map Phoro Simulation - View looking west from Silverbell Road ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 27 of 28■ 1 1 1 Chico 0; Existingis aWProposed Phoro Simulation - View looking west from Silverbell Road ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP10-0001 ■ Page 27 of 28■ • • Project Name: Minor Use Permit for AT&T Mobility, File # MUP10-0001 t, �r t • �t , .1 . _ ... - }�..yi't `L:'fv �\ .-. `., 1�r :- !�.- 4. �'��.� >_1. �..y.Y,•y.��..••1 _:\\ '.flM�-' V.., �-. . EziWiing • d:;l� �" .i "fes. !�'S•�y �•", ly ^�,;kN`;• �r�.-� .2• Pro o ed " Photo Simulation - View looking east across Hwy 99 from southbound on-ramp at Eaton Rd Photo Simulation - View looking north from northbound off -ramp from Hwy 99 at Eaton Rd ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP 10-0001 ■ Page 28 of 28■ Y IAL i - Chico Bank Bldg 3.15 SINabdl R000 ChIM, CA 95973 • • CNW90 atat Photo Simulation - View looking north from northbound off -ramp from Hwy 99 at Eaton Rd ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study — AT&T Mobility MUP 10-0001 ■ Page 28 of 28■ 0 • BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MUP10-0001 In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Butte County has prepared an Initial Study and is considering the adoption of a Negative Declaration for project MUP10-0001 (AT&T Mobility) at a public hearing before the Butte County Planning Commission to be held on November 18, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Project: MUP10-0001 (Applicant: AT&T Mobility c/o Frank Schabarum) APN: 007-390-001 Location: The project site is located at 3415 Silverbell Road, approximately 500 feet south of Eaton Road, Chico. Proposal: A minor use permit to collocate and operate a telecommunications facility on an existing 120 -foot tall lattice tower. The project consists of: 1) Three (3) antenna sectors with up to four (4) antennas per sector and two (2), 2 -foot diameter microwave dishes below the panel antennas; 2) One (1) 12 'x 20' equipment area within the existing building; and 3) Installation of coax lines and supporting equipment nest to the antenna and interior space within the existing building for ground equipment. The site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and has a General Plan land use designation of RTL (Retail and Office). The California Environmental Quality Act requires this notice to disclose whether any listed toxic sites are present on the project site. The project site does not contain a listed toxic site. The Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND) and reference documents for this project are on file for public review and comment starting Thursday, October 28, 2010 through Wednesday, November 17, 2010. Comments may be submitted in writing at any time prior to the hearing at the Butte County Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. The IS/ND is also available for review on the County website at www.buttecounty.net/dds and then by selecting Planning, Mitigated Negative Declarations and finally the project document. If you challenge the above application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to the public hearing. For information call or send an email to Mark Michelena, (530) 538-7376 or mmichelena@buttecounly.net. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES z HHU I L I fi Fi44499 3E 19t 4444 444 94 499 VIA ILI 9 IRA IF PI sasses a tees RE ee dde seelee 01- <-> 0 z HHU I L I 3E 0 3 Bianca Way 0 c Anza Way Calle Prim ipal . OWNER ABKEN JOSHUA & EMILY ANDERSON LIVING TRUST BAKUSJERRY BASSETT MELANIE BEDENE FRANK G SR & ALLYSON R BOE GUSTAV F CARLING FAMILY TRUST CARLON JOHN N CATAMOUNT BROADCASTING OF CHICO/BEDDING HURFORD ALBERT DALE JONES FAMILY TRUST MONLUX ERIC J NORTH CALIF PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSN PAYTON FAMILY TRUST PETELIN JOELLEN H & JAMES PRIDDY FAMILY TRUST RANDALL TIMOTHY J & BONIFACINO-RANDALL BERNADETTE REHKLAU JOHN P ETAL SLOAN THAD & TAWNYA OWNER ADD 380 GARDENSIDE CT 520 CUESTA DR 3477 HACKAMORE LN 3403 SILVERBELL RD 389 GARDENSIDE CT 365 GARDENSIDE CT 3393 SILVERBELL RD PO BOX 613 3460 SILVERBELL RD 3373 SILVERBELL RD 1365 JOY RD 11 YALE WAY 3435 SILVERBELL RD 372 GARDENSIDE CT 390 GARDENSIDE CT 307 MISSION SERRA TERR 371 GARDENSIDE CT 4318 KATHY LN 3383 SILVERBELL RD CITYSTZI P CHICO CA 95973 SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93405' CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95973 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95973 FALLBROOK CA 92028 CHICO CA 95926 CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95926 CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95973 u August 4, 2010 Photosimulation of view looking north from the northbound offramp from Hwy 99 to Eaton Road. This photosimulation is based upon information provided by the project applicant Questions or comments? call 1877-799-3210 or visit www.photosim.com,-" August 4, 2010 Aerlal phofog"rophs showing the viewpoints for the photosimulations. Y Proposed PA" Chico Bank Bldg "4+ N 9415 Silverbell Hood ' Chico, CA 95973 .40 CN0890 at&t IN © Copyright 2010, Previsualists Inc., all rights reserved. Any modification, alteration, cropping, copying or editing of any portion of this image is strictly prohibited and considered a violation of US copyright laws. This photosimulation is based upon information provided by the project applicant Questions or comments? call 1.877-799-3210 or visit www.photosim.com August 4, 2010 Photosimulation of view looking west from the nearest point along Silverbell Road. © Copyright 2010, Previsualists Inc., all rights reserved. Any modification, alteration, cropping, copying or editing of any portion of this image is strictly prohibited and considered a violation of US copyright laws.aU This photosimulation is based upon information provided by the project applicant. Questions or comments? call 1877-799-3210 or visit www.photosim.com ir.;n sem' August 4, 2010 Photosimulation of view looking east from across Hwy 99, on the southbound onramp from Eaton Rd. Proposed antennas----,. 79 1� t 2Y 0 ♦.'M a Ae� n Q.T . +'y,J - d .._ L - 7 �M �h �i • 006 - ~'r i c W a Nri `a-tr -- - - �,► j,,,�.,.�" _ �. � ,,-;� .�. � ��" � � � ,_ � Chico Bank Bldg .� 3415 Silverbell Road Chico, CA 95973 aUt © Copyright 2010, Previsualists Inc., all rights reserved. Any modification, alteration, cropping, copying or editing of any portion of this image is strictly prohibited and considered a violation of US copyright laws. This photosimulation is based upon information provided by the project applicant. Questions or comments? call 1-877-799-3210 or visit www.photosim.com n.r v SPECIAL INSPECTIONS 1 CONCRETE 2 BOLTS INSTALLED IN CONCRETE 3 CONCRETE MOMENT -RESISTING SPACE FRAME 4 REINFORCING STEEL AND PRESTRESSING STEEL 5.1 ALL STRUCTURAL WELDING 5.2 WELD TESTING DUCTILE MOMENT -RESISTING STEEL FRAMEFILL, 5.3 WELDING REINFORCING STEEL 6 HIGH-STRENGTH BOLTING 7 STRUCTURAL MASONRY 8 REINFORCED GYPSUM CONCRETE 9 INSULATING CONCRETE FILL15 10 SPRAY -APPLIED FIREPROOFING 11 DEEP FOUNDATIONS (PIUNG, DRILLED & CAISSONS) 12 SHOTCRETE 13.1 VERIFY SOIL CONDITIONS ARE SUBSTANTIALLY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT 13.2 VERIFY THAT FOUNDATION EXCAVATIONS EXTEND TO PROPER DEPTH AND BEARING STRATA 13.3 PROVIDE SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS, DEPTH OF RELATIVE DENSTIY, BEARING VALUES 13.4 PROVIDE SOIL EXPANSION TEST RESULTS, EXPANSION INDEX, RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FOUNDATIONS, ON - GRADE FLOOR SLAB DESIGN FOR EACH BUILDING SITE 14 SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SPECIAL CASES (DESCRIBE) 16 OFF-SITE FABRICATION OF BUILDING COMPONENTS 17 OTHER SPECIAL INSPECTIONS AS REQUIRED BY DESIGNER NO. DESCRIPTION OF TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUIRED, LOCATION, REMARKS. CN0890-A , CHICO BANK BLD 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 CONSULTANT TEAM CLIENTS REPRESENTATIVE: ERICSSON INC. 6160 STONERIDGE MALL ROAD SUITE 400 PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA 94588 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: JASON WOHLGEMUTH PHONE: (916) 995-7963 BLACK DOT WIRELESS 27271 LAS RAMBLAS; SUITE 200 MISSION VIEJO. CALIFORNA 92691 PHONE: (949) 502-3800 FAX: (949) 271-7940 SITE ACQUISITION & ZONING: FRANK SCHABARUM 10615 QUAIL HOLLOW LANE REDDING, CALIFORNIA 96003 PHONE: (530) 722-0743 RF ENGINEER: SON BUI (AT&T) PHONE: (571) 268-0137 ARCHITECT: JEFFREY ROME AND ASSOCIATES 3 SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA SUITE: 155 NEWPORT BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92660 PHONE. (702) 324-4338 FAX: (949) 760-3931. CONTACT: ROBIN NELSON LAND SURVEYOR: CALVADA SURVEYING, INC. 411 JENKINS CIRCLE, SURE 205 CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92880 PHONE: (951) 280-9960 FAX: (951) 280-9746 CONTACT: GABRIEL HERRERA ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: SCALE THE DRAWING SCALES SHOWN IN THIS SET REPRESENT THE CORRECT SCALE ONLY WHEN THESE DRAWINGS ARE PRINTED INA 24'X36' FORMAT. IF THIS DRAWING SET IS NOT 24'X36', THIS SET IS NOT TO SCALE. .mss DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY APPUCANT: AT&T MOBILITY 4430 ROSEWOOD DRIVE PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA 94588 PROPERTY OWNER: JOHN P. REHKLAU, EF AL 15260 WILLOW DRIVE. LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA. 95032 TOWER OWNER: THE ANTENNA COMPANY P.O. BOX 1217 FORESTHILL, CALIFORNIA 95631 CONTACT: SCOTT DONDEUNGER PHONE: (530) 888-7912 OTHER ON-SITE TELECOM FACIlR1ES: PROJECT ADDRESS: ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE: LAT/LONG TYPE: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED PROJECT AREA: PROPOSED TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: PROPOSED OCCUPANCY: EXISTING TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: EXISTING OCCUPANCY: JURISDICTION: COUNTY: CLEARWIRE. METRO PCS AND OTHER CARRIER 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 007-390-001 39' 46' 26.47' N 121' 52' 17.57' W NAD -83 C -2 -GENERAL COMMERCIAL 240 SQ. FT. TYPE V -B U TYPE V -B U BUTTE COUNTY BUTTE COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION AT&T MOBILITY PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN AN UNMANNED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY. THIS FACILITY WILL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: • INSTALL (12) PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON AN EXISTING 130'-10' LATTICE TOWER. • INSTALL 30 RUNS OF 1 5/8'0 COAXIAL CABLE AND 9 OTMA'S. • INSTALL AT&T INDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED WITHIN AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL TENANT SPACE. • UTILITY RUNS FOR ELECTRICAL. AND TELEPHONE. • INSTALL (6) REMOTE.RADIO HEADS (RRH) WITH 2 FIBER OPTIC LINES PER RRH. • ENTITLEMENT FOR 2-4' DIAMETER MICROWAVE DISHES. . ACCESSIBILITY DISCLAIMER THIS PROJECT IS AN UNOCCUPIED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AND IS EXEMPT FROM DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS. SHEET INDEX T-1 TITLE SHEET A-0. SITE PLAN A-1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN A-2 NORTHWEST & SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS A-3 EAST ELEVATION C-1 SITE SURVEY (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) APPLICABLE CODES ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING APPLICABLE CODES: CAUFORNIA BUILDING CODE, 2007 EDITION, BASED ON THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, 2007 EDITION, BASED ON THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, 2007 EDITION, BASED ON THE 2006 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 2007 EDITION, BASED ON THE 2006 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, 2007 EDITION, BASED ON THE 20115 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, 2007 EDITION. IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICT, THE MOST RESTRICTIVE CODE SHALL PREVAIL LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, - STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 1, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED, 'WOODSIDE SUBDIVISION', WHICH MAP WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON APRIL 9, 1980, IN BOOK 72 OF MAPS, AT PAGE(S) 44 AND 45. - - .J RA Jeffrey Rome & Associates, Inc. Architecture &. Telecommunications 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, California 92660 Phone: 949) 760-3929 Fax: 949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR r DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT w�FOSTA� OV �y��OH8TED. T �^J STAMP Of O Og76 EXP• NN t&t osewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE. SITE ACO & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD PROJECT NUMBER CN0890—A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING DATES 08/02/10 90% ZD REVIEW (P1) 08/23/10 100% FINAL ZD'S (P2) RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE ' TITLE SHEET T-1 L". SITE P 3 SECTORS) LAN) KEYNOTES OMNQUaED ON AN EXISTAT&T ANTENNNG (130ER10" L TTIICE TOWER; SEE SHEET A-1. 2 ((N AT&T 12-0" X 20-0' LEASE AREA WITHIN AN EX�SITING COMMERICAL TENANT SPACE; SEE SHEET A-1. 3 EXISTING TELCO CABINET AND (N) AT&T TELCO POC. 4AT&T POWER/ TELCO CONDUIT MOUNTED TO EXISTING MMERCIAL BUILDING WALL. PAINT TO MATCH BUILDING. DISTANCE 190'-D"t. 5 EXISTING ELECTRICAL CONDUIT AND (N) AT&T POWER SOURCE MOUNTED IN EMPTY METER SOCKET. 4 EXISTING PARKING. I TIT 7 EXISTING ACCESS DRIVEWAY AND (N) AT&T 12'-0" WIDE ACCESS ROUTE. 8 EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING. 9 EXISTING TREES. - — _ I 1 A2 A3 NORTH EAST 80 P65-15-XUt-R 140' 10' 80 P65 -15 -%LR -R 140 10 1 5 8 1 5.8 A4 - TX 1/RX 1 80 P65 -15 -%LR -R 140' - 0' 8 B1 TX 6 320 - S- - 140 2 BROWN B2 NORTH 320' P65 RAILI1-R 140 0 5/8 B3 WEST 320' Pfi5-15-XlR-R 140 10 1 5 8 B4 TX 6 }20 P65-15- UT -R 140' 0' 8 CI 30RG/1RED 200' P65-15-XLR-R 140 0 1 5 6 C2 SOUTH 200' P65-15-XLR-R 140 0 1 5 8 C3 WEST 200 P65-15-XLR-R 140' 0' S B C4 4 WHITE 200 65- 5- e ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE SCHEDULE 2 I. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL LABOR TO INSTALL 30 RUNS OF COAX, 9 DTMA'S, 17 RFT'S ANTI 17 wwhi PIAL 2. ERICSSON TO PROVIDE ALL COAX, CONNECTORS, ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING WEATHER STRIPPING, GROUND KITS, ETC.). 3. CONTRACTOR TO COLOR CODE ALL COAX. COLORED BANDS OF TAPE ON COAX IDENTIFY SECTOR, FREQUENCY, TECHNOLOGY, AND TRANSMIT GROUP AS FOLLOWS: TX 2/RX 2 O � 1 1 0� I J m 1 1 J 1 U1 \ 1 \ SECTOR "A" SECTOR "C" 4. WHEN ANTENNA LINES ARE DIPLEXED, THE COLOR CODE OF THE HIGHEST FREQUENCY PREVAILS (I.E. UMTS DIPLEXED WITH TDMA SHOULD HAVE COLOR 4 BANDS). .Q\\ - 5. ALL ANTENNAS AND ANTENNA CABLE SHALL BE FURNISHED BY ERICSSON INC. AND . TX 1/RX 1 TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 4 TX 5 TX 6 GSM 1900 2 BROWN 28RWN/1RED 2 ORANGE 20RG/lRED 2BRWN/2RED 20RG/2RED 2WHT/2RED TX 1/RX 1 TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 4 TX 5 TX 6 GSM 850 3 BROWN 30RWN/iRED 3 ORANGE 30RG/1RED 38RWN/2RED 30RG/2RED 3WHT/2RED TX 1/RX 1 TX 2/RX 2 TX 2/RX 2 40 PVC. ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SHALL BE IMC OR RIGID GALVANIZED. ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT PROTECTED IN A BUILDING OR ON A ROOF SHALL \ UMTS 1900 4 BROWN 4 ORANGE 4 WHITE PROVIDE FORMED GRIP STRUT COVER OVER COAXIAL CABLE ROUTES. WHERE CABLE IS - \ RUN ON THE WALL, ATTACH UNISTRUT TO WALL AND COVER WITH 14 GA GALVANIZED TX 1/RX 1 TX 2/RX 2 TX 2/RX 2 UMTS 850. 5 BROWN 5 ORANGE 5 BLUE O � 1 1 0� I J m 1 1 J 1 U1 \ 1 \ SECTOR "B" SECTOR "C" 4. WHEN ANTENNA LINES ARE DIPLEXED, THE COLOR CODE OF THE HIGHEST FREQUENCY PREVAILS (I.E. UMTS DIPLEXED WITH TDMA SHOULD HAVE COLOR 4 BANDS). .Q\\ - 5. ALL ANTENNAS AND ANTENNA CABLE SHALL BE FURNISHED BY ERICSSON INC. AND . TX 1/RX 1 TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 4 TX 5 TX 6 GSM 1900 2 YELLOW 2YEL/1REO 2 BLUE 28LUE/1REO 2YEL/2RED 2BLUE/2RED 2WHT/2RED TX 1/RX 1 TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 4 TX 5 TX 6 GSM 850 3 YELLOW 3YEL/1REO 3 BLUE 38LUE/1REO -3YEL/2RED 3BLUE/2RED 3WHT/2RED TX 1/RX 1 TX 2/RX 2 TX 2/RX 2 40 PVC. ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SHALL BE IMC OR RIGID GALVANIZED. ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT PROTECTED IN A BUILDING OR ON A ROOF SHALL \ UMTS 1900 4 YELLOW 4 BLUE 4 WHITE PROVIDE FORMED GRIP STRUT COVER OVER COAXIAL CABLE ROUTES. WHERE CABLE IS - \ RUN ON THE WALL, ATTACH UNISTRUT TO WALL AND COVER WITH 14 GA GALVANIZED TX 1/RX 1 TX2/RX 2 TX 2/RX 2 UMTS 850 '5 YELLOW 5 BLUE 5 BLUE O � 1 1 0� I J m 1 1 J 1 U1 \ 1 \ FORMED SHEET METAL COVER OR MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY ERICSSON INC. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 12. VERIFY ROUTE AND LENGTH OF CABLE PRIOR TO CUTTING. ADJUST INDICATED ROUTE / AS REQUIRED TO CLEAR (E) EQUIPMENT AT FACILITIES. 13. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 7/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 140'-0". MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-1/4" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 190'-0". MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-5/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 235'-0". - / N 14. VERIFY MODEL NUMBERS OF ANTENNAS WITH ERICSSON INC. SERVICES. / 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TESTING OF ANTENNAS AND SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION TO THE ERICSSON INC. PROJECT MANAGER. 16. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL TORQUE TOLERANCES PER THE MANUFACTURERS - SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. SCALE: 4 GENERAL ANTENNA &CABLE NOTESFJ] ® V 1'=20' 0 10' 20' `J RA Architecture 88 Telecommunications aHionee• 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, California 92660 Phone: (949) 760-3929 Fax: (949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS SWDPRIFTARY.,RY NATIIRF ANY IISF DISCLOSRF AiHER THAN THAT WH ICbA'F2 k1..A1 ES�0 AT&T STAMP \ qq`. PpN1E ISO a.� It OCP Vw:. t&t 0 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACO & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM w DATE AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD PROJECT NUMBER CN0890—A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO. CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING DATES 08/02/10 90% ZO REVIEW (P1) 08/23/10 100% FINAL ZD'S (P2) I RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN 0 oc i z A_0 W 0 a a SECTOR "C" 4. WHEN ANTENNA LINES ARE DIPLEXED, THE COLOR CODE OF THE HIGHEST FREQUENCY PREVAILS (I.E. UMTS DIPLEXED WITH TDMA SHOULD HAVE COLOR 4 BANDS). .Q\\ - 5. ALL ANTENNAS AND ANTENNA CABLE SHALL BE FURNISHED BY ERICSSON INC. AND . \ TX 1/RX 1 TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 4 TX 5 TX 6 GSM 1900 2 VIOLET 2110/1 RED 2 WHITE 2WHT/1RED 21A0/2RED 2WHT/2RED TX 1/RX 1 TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 4 TX 5 T% 6 GSM 850 3 VIOLET 3V10/1RED 3 WHITE 3WHF/1RE0 3W0/2RED 3WHT/2RED \ \ T% 1/RX 1 TX 2/RX 2 40 PVC. ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SHALL BE IMC OR RIGID GALVANIZED. ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT PROTECTED IN A BUILDING OR ON A ROOF SHALL \ BE EMT OR W STABILIZED PAINTED SCHEDULE 80 PVC. UMTS 1900 4 VIOLET 4 WHITE PROVIDE FORMED GRIP STRUT COVER OVER COAXIAL CABLE ROUTES. WHERE CABLE IS - \ RUN ON THE WALL, ATTACH UNISTRUT TO WALL AND COVER WITH 14 GA GALVANIZED TX 1/RX 1 TX 2/RX 2 UMTS 850 5 YELLOW 5 BLUE FORMED SHEET METAL COVER OR MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY ERICSSON INC. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 12. VERIFY ROUTE AND LENGTH OF CABLE PRIOR TO CUTTING. ADJUST INDICATED ROUTE / AS REQUIRED TO CLEAR (E) EQUIPMENT AT FACILITIES. 13. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 7/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 140'-0". MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-1/4" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 190'-0". MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-5/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 235'-0". - / N 14. VERIFY MODEL NUMBERS OF ANTENNAS WITH ERICSSON INC. SERVICES. / 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TESTING OF ANTENNAS AND SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION TO THE ERICSSON INC. PROJECT MANAGER. 16. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL TORQUE TOLERANCES PER THE MANUFACTURERS - SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. SCALE: 4 GENERAL ANTENNA &CABLE NOTESFJ] ® V 1'=20' 0 10' 20' `J RA Architecture 88 Telecommunications aHionee• 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, California 92660 Phone: (949) 760-3929 Fax: (949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS SWDPRIFTARY.,RY NATIIRF ANY IISF DISCLOSRF AiHER THAN THAT WH ICbA'F2 k1..A1 ES�0 AT&T STAMP \ qq`. PpN1E ISO a.� It OCP Vw:. t&t 0 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACO & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM w DATE AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD PROJECT NUMBER CN0890—A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO. CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING DATES 08/02/10 90% ZO REVIEW (P1) 08/23/10 100% FINAL ZD'S (P2) I RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN 0 oc i z A_0 W 0 a a \ 4. WHEN ANTENNA LINES ARE DIPLEXED, THE COLOR CODE OF THE HIGHEST FREQUENCY PREVAILS (I.E. UMTS DIPLEXED WITH TDMA SHOULD HAVE COLOR 4 BANDS). .Q\\ - 5. ALL ANTENNAS AND ANTENNA CABLE SHALL BE FURNISHED BY ERICSSON INC. AND . \ INSTALLED BY ANTENNA INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR. 6. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANTENNA POLE MOUNTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE AZIMUTH AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS MATCH ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. ' \ ALLOWABLE TOLERANCE: HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT = t5'; VERTICAL ALIGNMENT = t1'. f 7. ANTENNA INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL CONDUIT, CABLE TRAY, GROUNDS, ETC. FOR COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF ANTENNAS AND CABLES SHOWN AND INTENDED AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE OPERATING SYSTEM INACCORDANCEWITH ERICSSON INC. STANDARDS. \ \ B. IN NO CASE SHALL THERE BE ANY MORE THAN TWO (2) 90' TURNS (OR EQUIVALENT) IN ANY CONTINUOUS LENGTH OF CONDUIT BETWEEN PULL BOXES OR SIMILAR FEATURES. \ 9. ANTENNA CONDUIT SHALL ONLY INCLUDE FACTORY -MADE LARGE RADIUS SWEEPS AT \ ALL CHANGES IN DIRECTION. SWEEP RADIUS SHALL BE 18" MINIMUM ABOVE GROUND \ AND 36" MINIMUM BELOW GROUND. \ \ 10. CONDUIT SHALL BE 3"0 MINIMUM. ALL UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE - 40 PVC. ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SHALL BE IMC OR RIGID GALVANIZED. ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT PROTECTED IN A BUILDING OR ON A ROOF SHALL \ BE EMT OR W STABILIZED PAINTED SCHEDULE 80 PVC. 11. IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS OR WHERE. SUSCEPTIBLE TO DAMAGE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FORMED GRIP STRUT COVER OVER COAXIAL CABLE ROUTES. WHERE CABLE IS - \ RUN ON THE WALL, ATTACH UNISTRUT TO WALL AND COVER WITH 14 GA GALVANIZED FORMED SHEET METAL COVER OR MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY ERICSSON INC. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 12. VERIFY ROUTE AND LENGTH OF CABLE PRIOR TO CUTTING. ADJUST INDICATED ROUTE / AS REQUIRED TO CLEAR (E) EQUIPMENT AT FACILITIES. 13. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 7/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 140'-0". MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-1/4" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 190'-0". MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-5/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 235'-0". - / N 14. VERIFY MODEL NUMBERS OF ANTENNAS WITH ERICSSON INC. SERVICES. / 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TESTING OF ANTENNAS AND SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION TO THE ERICSSON INC. PROJECT MANAGER. 16. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL TORQUE TOLERANCES PER THE MANUFACTURERS - SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. SCALE: 4 GENERAL ANTENNA &CABLE NOTESFJ] ® V 1'=20' 0 10' 20' `J RA Architecture 88 Telecommunications aHionee• 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, California 92660 Phone: (949) 760-3929 Fax: (949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS SWDPRIFTARY.,RY NATIIRF ANY IISF DISCLOSRF AiHER THAN THAT WH ICbA'F2 k1..A1 ES�0 AT&T STAMP \ qq`. PpN1E ISO a.� It OCP Vw:. t&t 0 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACO & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM w DATE AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD PROJECT NUMBER CN0890—A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO. CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING DATES 08/02/10 90% ZO REVIEW (P1) 08/23/10 100% FINAL ZD'S (P2) I RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN 0 oc i z A_0 W 0 a a ,�. ENLARGED SITE PLAN KEYNOTES r �� 1 PROPOSED (12) AT&T�ANTENNAS 4 PER SECTOR, 3 SECTORS) MOUNTED ON AN EXISTING 130'-10 LATTICE TOWER. 9 EXISTING CLEARWIRE LEASE AREA. 16 EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING LOT. - ��TO� �' "A SECTOR 2 PROPOSED AT&TUI INDOOR ESHE 12' -O" -X20' -O' EQUIPMENT LOCATED WITHIN AN EXISTING BUILDING; SEE SHEEP 1/A-1. 10 EXISTING METRO PCS LEASE AREA 17 EXISTING COAX CABLE ENTRY PORT. MODIFY ENTRY PORT TO Bo ACCOMODATE NEW COAX CABLES. - 3 PROPOSED 18' WIDE SUSPENDED CABLE LADDER; 9'-0' ABOVE FINISH SURFACE. t0A OTHER CARRIER LEASE AREA. (N) PANEL ANTENNA - TYPICAL (4) PER SECTOR. 4 PROPOSED CABLE BRIDGE. 11 EXISTING CABLE LADDER. EXISTING LATTICE TOWER. . 5 PROPOSED GPS LOCATION. 12 EXISTING ENTRY DOOR. A 6 PROPOSED POWER & TELCO CONDUIT ROUTE MOUNTED ON BUILDING WALL PAINT TO MATCH BUILDING. 13 EXISTING BUILDING. - N . 7 PROPOSED GROUND MOUNTED A/C CONDENSOR UNITS.' 14 EXISTING METRO PCS ELECTRICAL BACKBOARD PANEL. U :a �. 8 EXISTING BUILDING OVERHANG. 15 EXISTING VERTICAL WALL MOUNTED AC UNIT. UN I N >< I 1 NOTE: OTHER CARRIER ANTENNAS - 16 OMMRTED FOR CLARITY. ANTENNA PLAN VIEW SCALE: 2 I 1/4"=1'-0" < I 0 2' 4' I 1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN KEYNOTES I 4 5 1 PROPOSED (4) AT&T INDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED I ON EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR. I i / \ 12 2 FUTURE (3) AT&T INDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS. - - 3 PROPOSED 4'-0'x 8'-0'x3/4' THK TELCO BACKBOARD WITH _ - FIRE RETARDANT PAINT. MOUNT EXTERNAL ALARM TO BACKBOARD. 12'-0• 4 PROPOSED GROUND MOUNTED A/C CONDENSER UNITS. AT&T LEASE AREA I— 17 5 PROPOSED ELECTRICAL PANEL MOUNTED TO EXISTING WALL 3 5 6 6 PROPOSED MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH MOUNTED TO WALL �T-I�_•�_I�•_.II - - 3 7 PROPOSED AT&T ARGUS 24VDC RECTIFIER CABINET. ' ( 8 PROPOSED AT&T BATTERY RACK. 11 16 i 9 PROPOSED LTE MU MOUNTED IN A 19' RACK. 12 10A I 10 PROPOSED DATA RACK. 13 ] rr 1 H Hi " MOUNTED TO GENERATOR OF RECEPTACLE 15 1-11 I 11 12 PROPOSED 2A-IOBC FIRE EXTINGUISHER MOUNTED IN EQUIPMENT ROOM. I Ir o 2 13 PROPOSED EYE WASH AND I � FIRST AID KIT MOUNTED IN EQUIPMENT ROOM. ,7 L a � � 2 1 13 - 1 14 PROPOSED PARTITION WALL 15 PROPOSED FIRE ALARM PANEL I 8 fl4 I 16 PROPOSED 3'-0' WIDE ACCESS DOOR. 7 AR U — 17 PROPOSED 12X12 VCT FLOOR WITH 4' RUSSER TOPSET BASE. 10 I 1 I _ II I 14 9 10 L—_--- ------- II ---_- I , x N N 15 7 14 6 _ O4 11 4 ENLARGED SITE PLAN SCALE: 3 ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN SCALE : 1 0—�, 3/16.=1'-0- 1/4`=1._D. 0, 01 ,J RA Jeffrey Rome k Associates, Inc. Architecture & Telecommunications 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, California 92660 Phone: (949) 760-3929 Fax: (949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCL TH ER THAN THAT W F� TO AT&T T11 I�{ I� HIBITED. V STAMP `. RoAe JE�G. 2p8�6_ FXp � Q2 s o at&t 443 Rosewood Drive ton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACO & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD PROJECT NUMBER CN0890—A 3415 SILVERSELL ROAD CHICO. CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING DATES 08/02/10 902 ZO REVIEW (P1) 08/23/10 1002 FINAL ZD'S (P2) RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE ENLARGED SITE PLAN A-1 s m Z r r>V ELEVATION KEYNOTES 1 PROPOSED (12). AT&T ANTENNAS (4 PER SECTORS, 3 SECTORS) - MOUNTED ON AN EXISTING 130'-10"HIGH LATTICE TOWER. 2 PROPOSED 12'-0" X 20'-0" AT&T LEASE AREA WITHIN EXISTING COMMERIAL TENANT SPACE. 3 -PROPOSED CABLE ROUTE. 4 PROPOSED CABLE BRIDGE MOUNTED FROM EXISTING BUILDING TO LATTICE TOWER. 5 PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA LOCATION. 6 EXISTING LATTICE TOWER. 7 EXISTING CLEARWIRE ANTENNAS. 8 EXISTING METRO PCS ANTENNAS. 9 EXISTING WHIP ANTENNAS. 10 EXISTING SATEUTE DISH. 11 EXISTING 6'-0" CHAINLINK FENCE OVER CONCRETE I 12 EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING. - 13 'PROPOSED (2) 2' DIAMETER MICROWAVE DISHES. 0 - �ji�y r 4. - TOP OF CONCRETE PAD- " SCALE: EAST ELEVATION 11/4 -=l' -O- 10 2, 4. 1 1 ,J RA Jeffrey Rome k Associates, Inc. Architecture. &: Telecommunications 3 Son Joaquin Plaza, Suite.155 .Newport Beach, California 92660 Phone: 949) 760-3929 Fax: 949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE ORDIS ER THAN THAT W E{P.T,E — AT&T HIBITE0. (� STAMP A� G JEFF p 086 G _Q at&t 0 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACO & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD PROJECT NUMBER CN0890—A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING DATES 08/02/10 90% ZD REVIEW (P1) 08/23/10 100% FINAL,ZD'S (P2) RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE' NORTHWEST ELEVATION A-3 ELEVATION KEYNOTES ELEVATION KEYNOTES 1 PROPOSED (12)'AT&T ANTENNAS (4 PER SECTORS, -3 SECTORS) - -' - 1 PROPOSED (12) AT&T ANTENNAS (4 PER SECTORS, 3 SECTORS) MOUNTED ON'EXISTING 130'-10 HIGH LATTICE TOWER. MOUNTED ON IN EXISTING 130'-10 LATTICE TOWER. 2 PROPOSED 12'-0' X 20'-0" AT&T LEASE AREA WITHIN - - 2 PROPOSED 12'-0* X 20'-0° AT&T LEASE AREA EXISTING COMMERIAL TENANT SPACE.. - ' - TOP OF EXISTING CLEARWIRE ANTENNAS. J TOP OF EXISTING CLEARWIRE ANTENNAS. 3 PROPOSED AT&T VERTICAL CABLE ROUTE. 130.80 A.G.L. ��130.80 A.G.L. 3 PROPOSED CABLE ROUTE. 7 5 _ 4 PROPOSED CABLE BRIDGE MOUNTED FROM EXISTING BUILDING TO LATTICE TOWER. '^- 1: 4 EXISTING LATTICE TOWER. 5 PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA LOCATION. 1 .. - 5 EXISTING CLEARWIRE ANTENNAS. 6 6 EXISYING LATTICE TOWER. \ a % f1 I I rFMTFo nF FVIFTIAIr IIFTRnPr`C nnfrFMelnC - - - - 118.00 AG.L ranRFo nF GV1 'TIME IICTonnK eMTFnW- - - - 118.00 A.G.L. 6 EXISTING METRO PCS ANTENNAS. 7 EXISTING CLEARWIRE ANTENNAS. 7 EXISTING WHIP ANTENNAS. 8 EXISTING METRO PCS ANTENNAS. TOP OF EXISTING WHIP ANTENNAS., 110.00 A.G.L. PP �- TOP OF EXISTING WHIP ANTENNAS. 110.00 AG.L 8 - EXISTING SATELITE DISH. 9 EXISTING WHIP ANTENNAS. <3> 7 9 EXISTING 6'-0", CHAINUNK_ FENCE OVER CONCRETE, PAD. 10 EXISTING SATELITE DISH:. 10 EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING. 11 EXISTING 6'-0' CHAINUNK FENCE OVER CONCRETE PAD. 11 PROPOSED (2) 2' DIAMETER MICROWAVE DISHES. 12 EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING. - - 13 PROPOSED (2) 2' DIAMETER MICROWAVE DISHES. TOP OF (N) AT&T ANTENNAS. .TOP OF (N) AT&T ANTENNAS. 87.20 A.G.L. - 87.20 A.G.L. - 1 €[ fCENTER OF (N) AT&T ANTE 65.00 A.G.L. - : CENTER OF (N) AT&T ANTENNAS. 85.00 A.C.L. l I 1 tt _ -'!L I'Uii •!!tl CENTER OF (N) MICROWAVE ANTENNAS. CENTER OF (N) MICROWAVE ANTENNAS. - 13 IP 80.00 A.G.L. 80.00 A.G.L. RIM I±;,�ti urul Uri .. iitl uA!i! T !! ru �!!a o o itt;{jl t2 n. !a I;11 Ig;14 illi Lll,c 5 QIIF1 Illli!I 4 - - II!! 11110, ph; ,1i4 0l m m o II!1. 3 Ifiiili � � plCit �IjJI � m m o Ilipjl arca w,lou . LIU!! lihiil cill^ IDIIC gPfii. ' JI'o11 - ;A�r: uqr IPlli altl i 0 t0 81G7 8 I;GIP. ,Rite ' Pd!ili lih;� ' 0ii A"!f tlNili 4ipi ii�jb tlliiJ �.Gi ILS w 16 I. I .. ' OP OF TOP OF CONCRETE M PID.- .. - t TOP OF F.S. TOP OF F.S. 0.00 A.C.L.. I. .. .. .. - 0.00 A.C.L.. I I - I 9 '. 2 10 NORTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE: 2 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE: ,SCALE:O- k4-=1'—O-SALE:0, ®, ,J FRA Jeffrey Rome & Associates, Inc. Architecture. &. Telecommunications 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite. 155 Newport Beach, California 92660 Phone: 949 760-3929 Fax: 949 760-3931 -- PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE QRlsm OS((R FR THAN�TH T MOBI �V S /N;/R, /R, BITED. V STAMP �7 RoME QEF G, 2aB�6 2 ' EXP• T E aut 44 Rosewood Drive sonton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE_ SITE ACO & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE. PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD. PROJECT NUMBER CN0890—A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973. BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING DATES 08/02/10 90% ZD REVIEW (PI 08/23/10 100% FINAL ZD'S(P2) REDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE NORTHWEST & SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS A-2 . Vicinity Map Legend FS FINISH SLWALE NICO FENCE NG NATURAL GROUND CHAIN LINK FENCE x POKER POLE LIGHT RETZMO OCH WALL 40 NATER VALIE O SIU7YEY TRIOL POINT TOP 70P aF STRUCTURE EX171 CONCRETE PAYOONT A GEODETIC COCKVNAYES EDGE OF PAV80VT NBMAIL BOX O TREE OW FIRE HYDRANT/ME TOTCP a< OURS EB ELECTRIC BOX — PROsE7RTY UNE EM ELECTRIC METER Title Report PREPARED BN.AOD VALLEY TITIE R ESCROW ODVPANY ORDER Na: 0101-5445888 DARK' ,UNE 16.2010 Legal Description REAL PROPERTY C THE UNINOORPORATED AREA OF WE COUNTY OF BUTT& STA 7F OF CALIFORNIA OES1Xd'BED AS FOLLOW LOT 1, AS SHONN ON THAT OERTAW YAP OV77MM 'NOOOS VE SUEIDIKSION; WON N YAP WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORM OF THE COUNTY OF BUR& SKATE 6oRN/A, OF CAlON APRIL A 1884 IN BOOR 72 OF YAPS, AT PAW(S) 44 AND 41 Assessor's Parcel No. 007 -JW -001 Easements ORESOLUTION ESTABUSNTNO WOUSIDE STREET UGfRNG m"n NANCE DISTRICT RECOROED JANUARY 29 1961 IN BOOK 2584 PACE 4.54 OR. (BLANi a NATUR0 ®BOOIQUISHN,YENT 58$ UTT IE (PLo� RECCROM N JANUARY 24 TOM IN ©RELINOW9HMOVT OF ABUTTERS RIGHTS RELIOROED JANE 4 1964 IN BOCK 1317, PAGE 484 OR (PLOTTED HEREON) ®�TI)O� RESERVATIONS AS SET FORTH ON SAID ARP. (PLOTTED to?E&A RIS BBA ORAND ES TS REGCORDFD MAY J4 1880 IN BOOK 2514 PAW Access Route THAT PORTION OF LOT 1, N INE COUNTY OF EUT7& STA 7E OF CALIFORNIA AS SHONN ON THAT CERrAW YAP ENURED, 'NOGa4DE SUBpNSOV . W"H YAP WAS FUM 7N THE CHIVE OF TIS RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, ON APRIL. A 1984 LN BOW 72 OF MAPS AT PAGE(S) 44 AND 44 BEING A STRIP OF LAAO 1200 PEST MID& LYWO 800 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FU LOWNG DESORIBED CIEWERLAW C0100'NONO AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID -LOT 1, SAID PONT BUNG ON A GURW CONCAW NORTHEASTERLY, NANNG A RADIUS OF BJOOO I= A RADIAL LINE 7XIMOH SAID PONT BEARS N75W 49'£ THENCE NORTNNESTER"Y ALONG SAID C1/RW TNRWW A C9f7RAL ANGLE of 5w"14". AN ARC DJSTANI£ of BI.22 PELT TO THE PONT OF LSOHIIINA A RADIAL LUNE THROUGH SAID PONT BEARS 58077721* THENCE S791MIMIK 244. BJ PEEP, THENCE SI45472'& 4064 FEET RR TNT EMD OF SAID STRIP THENCE SM75Y7'& 2330 FEET TO A PONT NERQNAF7E'R REFEA!RW TO AS PONT it Lease Area AlrWR3N9 Ar I'WIT ;1° .19 r0craw .1 Dir TIDNLE Sf I'ITW'& 2808 I'm TIBNDE S7572"2419 1200 FEET Ii ENCS N14171J51K 2aOO FEEL,' THENCE N75721247 1200 FELT TO THE PONT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 240 SQUARE FEET. MORE OR LESS Utility Route BEING A STRIP OF LANA SCO FEET NLD& LYING 250 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWX O OE'1NTFRUNE BEG NMNG AT PONT A' AS OESCED ABODE THENCE 51417'W6 E 2000 FEET,' IN90 E S03711541%7.81 FELT ID THE TRW PONT aF SEOINMNy WOKE S144r56'& 250 FEET TI¢NCE 0757224'& HB&BO FET TD THF 00 OF SAID SIRTP Geographic Coordinates at Existing Lattice Tower TOM 110171AC LARii/DE J8' 46' 2&471V Lownix r21' S2' r7.57W ELEVATION - 17&8 FELT ABOW MEAN SEA LEVEL Basis of Bearings THE STATE RAW C ORDNAS 51570L OF IB&T (NAD W3 CALIFORNIA ZONE 2 Bench Mark INE NDS OPS POINT Na 7HSI/aS' ELEVATION - 251.82 FEET (NAM 88) CERTHFTCA TION.' THE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE SHONN ABOW ARE ACCURATE TO W7HW +/- 15 FEET !HORIZONTALLY AND THAT THE ELEVATIONS SHONN ABOW ARE ACCURATE TD WZH N +/- 3 FIST W N71CALLY. THE HORIZONTAL DATUM (=WAPNIC COORDINATES) IS ON IERMS AAOF THE &VIES (7�AA O�ANDATi M g INE Tea TH OF AE7a h DEGREES (2 Date of Survey n INT 14RWAL DARDI (ELEVATIONS) 6 M 7036 OF THE NORTH AAWWAN VERTICAL. DATUM JAY 14 2010 OF 1888 (NAW B8) AND 6 OEMBIVIED TD THE AMWEST TENTH OF A FOOT. 1 1 A.P.N. 007-390-026 2J9 09 10P 18J115.51'Wat � /• I ` IW I196lLp — EA.410NT ' . ' • . & 7JJ 8 OINGN ... ,. _ 7 OWING &4" fly 191.79rfP niRT fly 17697rs IaOMG 1 ,•.I767NS 111176.605 1 17616NG 1 EXISTING BLBDOK' / 0176.E6rs 176.9 �1 1 MEWS �y AT&T if - fE __ P.aa cl AGO LOT ■176605 1 —__ __ �176.B� -- �2259Jla° [�( 2d '%11K",; WOODS/DE SUBDIVISION—AspFmT '::� S �0S 76SYS ;' n65N5 M.B. 72144-45 .Ts6., 8 •76,315 A.P.N. 007-390-001 Ile. J 5-g76'S6 _ alsvr 176.I9f 9 •!76!7!5 8 9 _ _88117616(5 _ _ 817647!5 116.50C I175..16FS 1 I I FD I Ma 72, '176J9rS 176005 I 4176.295 IJ J W m J N 175905 } DRAINAGE \ _ — :: ■176505 1 ` 3 EASEW NT •175905 r — _ —_ —___ _ 76705 1 11y1 ¢ 1 \ ` =_ ►_� 13I76.Jirs 6105 01756115 \ _TA"'77R 6176.66FS = 1757615 01761115 1 II 69NG' 175505\ �% 1 - \ASNALT--S 0176705' ;�•';""y;:,,.•' I JVS 1� 177.05MP \ 17566rS\ \ 1768.05 759NS 1@l,bY1PP 17aWs J06. 870P\ 176.77`3 /'. EXISTING LATTICE TOWER 147 \!-'';' •'istOXw/ :%%;:�....,' \_ GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES m;;%'%%. m 176.4113 / T. 38'4828.47 N NDS '� ;. _ CNC.— 12152'17.STW (NAD 83 ITS IlrS �TB6.JJ2P' .�,; Q` B�LOY(' _ten T d %'/ al.11rcP NDS �. PNS' Ve� \ , J1�`0.5 72 LI AUNT ,,;;;. 0. 175B6NG 1 \ — FLUX NSA %"•:'•• 0I7176NG '3 , /• • PILE - LOT 2 A.P.N. 007-390-002 Lattice Tower Profile EASIf1RY ETEYATION (LITS) \ LINE TABLE LINE# DIRECTION LENGTH If 94' W JOT JODY U 57T fir " " U MF 420,>D'N' Jl107' • L4 Ms' Ir 24T U.L9' L5 SOT 21'547 731 N 674-W JIT 2Sd VII GRAPHIC SCALE ' 20 0 10 20 FEET 01 .J RA Jeffrey Rome & Associates, Inc. Architecture & Telecommunications 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, California 92660 Phone: (949) 760-3929 Fax: (949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT W.HIgH RFI.ATFS, To. AT&T MOBILITY IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. CONSULTANT CRL VADA SUAVEYING, INC. sAe>O. C..o,a CA02S110 Nue:95,-IDa89fi0 F¢851iBD91/9 TdF-:eOaCALVN1A .w.aNffiaam 308140. ta611 PREPARED FOR t� at&t 4430 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. DATE SAC AND ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE AT&T CM DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BUILDING PROJECT NUMBER CN0890 3415 SILVERSELL ROAD, CHICO, CA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DATE DESCRIPTION BY 07/20/10 SUBMITTAL MN 08/03/10 TITLE REPORT / FINAL RAS SHEET TITLE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY C-1 SHEET 1 OF 1 LINE TABLE LINE# DIRECTION LENGTH If 94' W JOT JODY U 57T fir " " U MF 420,>D'N' Jl107' • L4 Ms' Ir 24T U.L9' L5 SOT 21'547 731 N 674-W JIT 2Sd VII GRAPHIC SCALE ' 20 0 10 20 FEET 01 .J RA Jeffrey Rome & Associates, Inc. Architecture & Telecommunications 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, California 92660 Phone: (949) 760-3929 Fax: (949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT W.HIgH RFI.ATFS, To. AT&T MOBILITY IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. CONSULTANT CRL VADA SUAVEYING, INC. sAe>O. C..o,a CA02S110 Nue:95,-IDa89fi0 F¢851iBD91/9 TdF-:eOaCALVN1A .w.aNffiaam 308140. ta611 PREPARED FOR t� at&t 4430 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. DATE SAC AND ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE AT&T CM DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BUILDING PROJECT NUMBER CN0890 3415 SILVERSELL ROAD, CHICO, CA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DATE DESCRIPTION BY 07/20/10 SUBMITTAL MN 08/03/10 TITLE REPORT / FINAL RAS SHEET TITLE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY C-1 SHEET 1 OF 1 1, 4j/ SPECIAL INSPECTIONS ICONCRETE 2 BOLTS INSTALLED IN CONCRETE 3 CONCRETE MOMENT -RESISTING SPACE FRAME 4 REINFORCING STEEL AND PRESTRESSING STEEL 5.1 ALL STRUCTURAL WELDING 5.2 WELD TESTING DUCTILE MOMENT -RESISTING STEEL FRAME- 5.3 WELDING REINFORCING STEEL 6 HIGH-STRENGTH BOLTING 7 - STRUCTURAL MASONRY 8 REINFORCED GYPSUM CONCRETE 9 INSULATING CONCRETE FILL 10 SPRAY-APPUED FIREPROOFING 11 DEEP FOUNDATIONS (PIUNG, DRILLED & CAISSONS) 12 SHOTCRETE 13.1 VERIFY SOIL CONDITIONS ARE SUBSTANTIALLY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT 13.2 VERIFY THAT FOUNDATION EXCAVATIONS EXTEND TO PROPER DEPTH AND BEARING STRATA 13.3 PROVIDE SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS, DEPTH OF FILL, RELATIVE DENSITY, BEARING VALUES 13.4 PROVIDE SOIL EXPANSION TEST RESULTS, EXPANSION INDEX, RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FOUNDATIONS, ON - GRADE FLOOR SLAB DESIGN FOR EACH BUILDING SITE 14 SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM 15 SPECIAL CASES (DESCRIBE) 16 OFF-SITE FABRICATION OF BUILDING COMPONENTS 17 .OTHER SPECIAL INSPECTIONS AS REQUIRED BY DESIGNER NO. DESCRIPTION OF TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUIRED, LOCATION, REMARKS. ERICSSON CM PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA 94588 PROPERTY OWNER: JOHN P. REHKLAU, Er AL LATITUDE:'? 15260 WILLOW DRIVE. ' LONGITUDE: LOS GATOS. CALIFORNIA 95032 TOWER OWNER: THE ANTENNA COMPANY EXISTING ZONING: P.O. BOX 1217 PROPOSED PROJECT AREA: FORESTHILL, CALIFORNIA 95631 e CN0890-A CHICO BANK BLD 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 CONSULTANT TEAM CLIENTS REPRESENTATIVE: ERICSSON INC. 6160 STONERIDGE MALL ROAD SUITE 400 PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA 94588 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: JASON WOHLGEMUTH - PHONE: (916) 995-7963 BLACK DOT WIRELESS 27271 LAS RAMBLAS; SUITE 200 MISSION VIEJO. CALIFORNIA 92691 PHONE (949) 502-3800 FAX, (949) 271-7940 SITE ACQUISITION & ZONING: FRANK SCHABARUM 10615 QUAIL HOLLOW LANE REDDING, CALIFORNIA 96003 PHONE: (530) 722-0743 RF ENGINEER: SON BUI (AT&T) PHONE: (571) 268-0137 ARCHITECT: JEFFREY ROME AND ASSOCIATES - 3 SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA SUFTE: 155 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 PHONE (702) 324-4338 FAX: (949) 760-3931 CONTACT: ROBIN NELSON LAND SURVEYOR: CALVADA SURVEYING, INC. 411 JENKINS CIRCLE, SUITE 205 CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92880 PHONE: (951) 280-9960 FAX: (951) 280-9746 CONTACT: GABRIEL HERRERA ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY APPLICANT: AT&T MOBILITY PROJECT ADDRESS: 4430 ROSEWOOD DRIVE ERICSSON CM PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA 94588 PROPERTY OWNER: JOHN P. REHKLAU, Er AL LATITUDE:'? 15260 WILLOW DRIVE. ' LONGITUDE: LOS GATOS. CALIFORNIA 95032 TOWER OWNER: THE ANTENNA COMPANY EXISTING ZONING: P.O. BOX 1217 PROPOSED PROJECT AREA: FORESTHILL, CALIFORNIA 95631 PROPOSED TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: CONTACT: SCOTT DONDELINGER PROPOSED OCCUPANCY: PHONE: (530) 888-7912 OTHER ON-SITE TELECOM FACILITIES: CLEARWIRE, METRO PCS AND OTHER CARRIER PROJECT ADDRESS: 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD ERICSSON CM CHICO, CAUFORNIA 95973 ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: 007-390-001 - LATITUDE:'? 39' 46' 26.47 N LONGITUDE: 121' 52' 17.57' W LAT/LONG TYPE: t NAD -83 EXISTING ZONING: C -2 -GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPOSED PROJECT AREA: 240 SQ. FT. PROPOSED TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE V -B PROPOSED OCCUPANCY: U EXISTING TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE V -B EXISTING OCCUPANCY: U JURISDICTION: BUTTE COUNT/ COUNTY: BUTTE COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION AT&T MOBILITY PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN AN UNMANNED. WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY. THIS FACILITY WILL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: • INSTALL (12) PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON AN EXISTING 130'-10' LATTICE TOWER. •;INSTALL 30 RUNS OF 1 5/8'0 COAXIAL CABLE AND 9 DTMA'S. • INSTALL AT&T INDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED WITHIN AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL TENANT SPACE. • UTILITY RUNS FOR ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE. • INSTALL (6) REMOTE RADIO HEADS (RRH) WITH 2 FIBER OPTIC LINES PER RRH. ENTITLEMENT FOR 2-4' DIAMETER MICROWAVE -DISHES. SCALE - ACCESSIBILITY DISCLAIMER THE DRAWING SCALES SHOWN IN THIS SET REPRESENT THE CORRECT SCALE ONLY WHEN THESE DRAWINGS ARE PRINTED IN A THIS PROJECT IS AN UNOCCUPIED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AND 24'X36' FORMAT. IF THIS DRAWING SET IS NOT 24'X36', THIS IS EXEMPT FROM DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS. SET IS NOT TO SCALE. BUTTE COUNTY -SEP, - 2 2010 2InvX-,LoPW. T SPRMW SHEET INDEX T-1 TITLE SHEET A-0 SITE PLAN A-1 ENLARGED SITE PIAN A-2 NORTHWEST & SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS A-3 EAST ELEVATION C-1 SITE SURVEY (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) APPLICABLE CODES ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING APPLICABLE CODES: CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, 2007 EDITION, BASED ON THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, 2007 EDITION, BASED ON THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, 2007 EDITION, BASED ON THE 2006 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE CAUFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 2007 EDITION, BASED ON THE 2006 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE CAUFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, 2007 EDITION, BASED ON THE 2005 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, 2007 EDITION. IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICT, THE MOST RESTRICTIVE CODE SHALL PREVAIL LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT1, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED,-WOODSIDE SUBDIVISION', WHICH MAP WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON APRIL 9, 1980, IN BOOK 72 OF MAPS, AT PAGE(S) 44 AND 45. ,J RA' Jeffrey Rome & Associates, Inc. Architecture & TBlecommunIcallons 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, California 92660 Phone: 949 760-3929 Fox: 949 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH R���eT„��c TO AT&T STAMP Y � F10ME nnit7fi F(P t&t Rosewood Drive an easton, )California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE -- SITE ACID & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD PROJECT NUMBER CN0890-A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING DATES 08/02/10 90% ZO REVIEW (P1) 08/23/10 100% FINAL ZD'S (P2) RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE _ TITLE SHEET n 0 o_ o: z T-1 W a a o: JI'L'L 1- -1Y V I LJ 1 3W OMNOa, ON AN EXISTING (130'-10 SECTOR, LATTCE TOWER; SEE SHEET A-1. 2AT&T 12-0" X 20-0" LEASE AREA WITHIN AN (N) SITING COMMERICAL TENANT SPACE; SEE SHEET A-1. - 3 EXISTING TELCO CABINET AND (N) AT&T TELCO POC. 4AT&T POWER/ TELCO CONDUIT MOUNTED TO EXISTING MMERCIAL 'BUILDING WALL. PAINT TO MATCH BUILDING. DISTANCE 190'-0"3. 5 EXISTING ELECTRICAL CONDUIT AND (N) AT&T POWER SOURCE MOUNTED IN EMPTY METER SOCKET. 6 EXISTING PARKING LOT. 7 EXISTING ACCESS DRIVEWAY AND (N) AT&T 12'-0" WIDE ACCESS ROUTE. 8 EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING. 9 EXISTING TREES. y�1 l S ITE P LAN „rql" 1 1 1 I I Q 1 1 0 � 1 I J m 1 1 ILA IL 1 1 1 A2 A3 A4 .' NORTH FAST - NU P65-15-XUi-K -80' P65 -15 -XIII 140" 10' 140 10 1 b/13 1 58 80' P65-15-XLR- 140' 0' S 8" TX 2/RX 2 B2 NORTH- WEST 320' 6 - 5- - 140 0 8 320' P65-15-XUt-R 140 0 5 8 B3 84 720 P65_15-%lR-R 140 320' I P65=15 XUR-R 140' 0 1 5 8 TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 C1 C2 C3 C4 SOUTH WESi 200' P65 -IS -%LR -R 140 0 5 8 200' P65 -IS -%IR -R 140 0 1 518 200' PfiS-IS-%lR-R 140' 0' S B 200' 65- 5- e 3BRWN/2RED ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE SCHEDULE 2 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL LABOR TO INSTALL 30 RUNS OF COAX, 9 DTMA'S, 12 REVS, AND 12 ANTENNAS. 2. ERICSSON TO PROVIDE ALL COAX, CONNECTORS, ,ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING WEATHER STRIPPING, GROUND KITS, ETC.). 3. CONTRACTOR TO COLOR CODE ALL COAX. COLORED BANDS OF TAPE ON COAX IDENTIFY SECTOR,' FREQUENCY, TECHNOLOGY, AND TRANSMIT GROUP AS FOLLOWS: UMTS 1900 1 1 1 I I Q 1 1 0 � 1 I J m 1 1 ILA IL 1 1 1 FORMED SHEET METAL COVER OR MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY ERICSSON INC. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. - 12. VENifY nUUlt AN LervGfH Of CAOLC PRION 'R/ WTlnv'3. AUuUiiT iivDICATCO ROUTE / AS REQUIRED TO CLEAR (E) EQUIPMENT AT FACILITIES. 13. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 7/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 140'-0'. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-1/4" COAX CABLE SHALL BE. 190'-0-. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-5/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 235'-0". N 14. VERIFY MODEL NUMBERS OF"ANTENNAS WITH ERICSSON INC. SERVICES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TESTING OF ANTENNAS AND SHALL PROVIDE - DOCUMENTATION TO THE ERICSSON INC. PROJECT MANAGER. 16. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL TORQUE TOLERANCES PER THE MANUFACTURERS / SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. SCALE: 3 GENERAL ANTENNA & CABLE NOTES .J FRA eleRome &o8o+HInc. Architecture &Telecommunications 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, Collfomla 92660 Phone: 949 760-3929 Fax: 949 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR THAT DISIMP T TED. STAMP C�A JE REYL. R7COME f EXP. at&t 4430 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACO & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE" AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD PROJECT NUMBER CN0890-A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO. CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING DATES "08/02/10 90% ZO REVIEW (P1). 08/23/10 10OX FINAL ZD'S (P2), _ RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN A-0 SECTOR "A" SECTOR 'C" - 4. WHEN ANTENNA LINES ARE DIPLEXED, THE COLOR CODE OF THE HIGHEST FREQUENCY PREVAILS "(LE.'UMTS DIPLEXED WITH TDMA SHOULD HAVE COLOR 4 BANDS). S. ALL ANTENNAS AND -ANTENNA CABLE SHALL BE FURNISHED BY ERICSSON INC. AND TX 1/RX 1 TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 4 TX 5 TX 6 GSM 1900 2 BROWN 28RWN/1RED 2 ORANGE 20RG/1RED 2BRWN/2RED 2ORG/2RED TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 1/RX 1 TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 4 TX 5 TX 6 GSM 850 3 BROWN 38RWN/1RED 3 ORANGE 3ORG/1RED 3BRWN/2RED 3ORG/2RED 10. CONDUIT SHALL BE 3"0 MINIMUM. ALL UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE TX 1/RX 1 UMTS 1900 TX 2/RX 2 4 BLUE 4 WHITE 11. IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS OR WHERE SUSCEPTIBLE TO DAMAGE CONTRACTOR SHALL UMTS 1900 4 BROWN TX 1/RX 1 4 ORANGE TX 2/RX 2 UMTS 850 TX 1/RX 1 - 5 BLUE TX 2/RX 2 UMTS 850 5 BROWN 5 ORANGE FORMED SHEET METAL COVER OR MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY ERICSSON INC. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. - 12. VENifY nUUlt AN LervGfH Of CAOLC PRION 'R/ WTlnv'3. AUuUiiT iivDICATCO ROUTE / AS REQUIRED TO CLEAR (E) EQUIPMENT AT FACILITIES. 13. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 7/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 140'-0'. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-1/4" COAX CABLE SHALL BE. 190'-0-. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-5/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 235'-0". N 14. VERIFY MODEL NUMBERS OF"ANTENNAS WITH ERICSSON INC. SERVICES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TESTING OF ANTENNAS AND SHALL PROVIDE - DOCUMENTATION TO THE ERICSSON INC. PROJECT MANAGER. 16. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL TORQUE TOLERANCES PER THE MANUFACTURERS / SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. SCALE: 3 GENERAL ANTENNA & CABLE NOTES .J FRA eleRome &o8o+HInc. Architecture &Telecommunications 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, Collfomla 92660 Phone: 949 760-3929 Fax: 949 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR THAT DISIMP T TED. STAMP C�A JE REYL. R7COME f EXP. at&t 4430 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACO & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE" AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD PROJECT NUMBER CN0890-A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO. CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING DATES "08/02/10 90% ZO REVIEW (P1). 08/23/10 10OX FINAL ZD'S (P2), _ RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN A-0 SECTOR "B" SECTOR 'C" - 4. WHEN ANTENNA LINES ARE DIPLEXED, THE COLOR CODE OF THE HIGHEST FREQUENCY PREVAILS "(LE.'UMTS DIPLEXED WITH TDMA SHOULD HAVE COLOR 4 BANDS). S. ALL ANTENNAS AND -ANTENNA CABLE SHALL BE FURNISHED BY ERICSSON INC. AND TX 1/RX 1 TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 4 TX TX 6 GSM 1900 2 YELLOW 2YEL/1REO 2 BLUE 28LUE/1RED 2YEL/2REO 2BLUE/2RED 2WHT/2RED TX 1/RX 1 TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 4 TX 5 TX 6 GSM 850 3 YELLOW 3YEL/1RED 3 BLUE 38LUE/1RED 3YEL/2RED 3BtI E/2RED 3WHT/2RED TX 1/RX 1 TX 2/RX 2 TX 2/RX 2 10. CONDUIT SHALL BE 3"0 MINIMUM. ALL UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE UMTS 1900 4 YELLOW 4 BLUE 4 WHITE 11. IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS OR WHERE SUSCEPTIBLE TO DAMAGE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FORMED GRIP STRUT COVER OVER COAXIAL CABLE ROUTES. WHERE CABLE IS TX 1/RX 1 TX 2/RX 2 TX 2/RX 2 UMTS 850 5 YELLOW - 5 BLUE 5 BLUE FORMED SHEET METAL COVER OR MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY ERICSSON INC. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. - 12. VENifY nUUlt AN LervGfH Of CAOLC PRION 'R/ WTlnv'3. AUuUiiT iivDICATCO ROUTE / AS REQUIRED TO CLEAR (E) EQUIPMENT AT FACILITIES. 13. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 7/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 140'-0'. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-1/4" COAX CABLE SHALL BE. 190'-0-. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-5/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 235'-0". N 14. VERIFY MODEL NUMBERS OF"ANTENNAS WITH ERICSSON INC. SERVICES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TESTING OF ANTENNAS AND SHALL PROVIDE - DOCUMENTATION TO THE ERICSSON INC. PROJECT MANAGER. 16. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL TORQUE TOLERANCES PER THE MANUFACTURERS / SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. SCALE: 3 GENERAL ANTENNA & CABLE NOTES .J FRA eleRome &o8o+HInc. Architecture &Telecommunications 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, Collfomla 92660 Phone: 949 760-3929 Fax: 949 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR THAT DISIMP T TED. STAMP C�A JE REYL. R7COME f EXP. at&t 4430 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACO & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE" AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD PROJECT NUMBER CN0890-A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO. CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING DATES "08/02/10 90% ZO REVIEW (P1). 08/23/10 10OX FINAL ZD'S (P2), _ RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN A-0 SECTOR 'C" - 4. WHEN ANTENNA LINES ARE DIPLEXED, THE COLOR CODE OF THE HIGHEST FREQUENCY PREVAILS "(LE.'UMTS DIPLEXED WITH TDMA SHOULD HAVE COLOR 4 BANDS). S. ALL ANTENNAS AND -ANTENNA CABLE SHALL BE FURNISHED BY ERICSSON INC. AND \ TX I/RX 1 TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 4 TX 5 TX 6 GSM 1900 2 VIOLET 2VIO/1RED 2 WHITE 2WHT/1 RED 2W0/2RED 2WHT/2RED TX 1/RX 1 TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 4 - TX 5 TX 6 GSM 850 3 VIOLET 3VIO/1RED 3 WHITE 3WHT/1REO 3VIO/2RED 3WHT/2RED \ TX 1/RX 1 TX 2/RX 2 10. CONDUIT SHALL BE 3"0 MINIMUM. ALL UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC. ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SHALL BE IMC OR RIGID GALVANIZED. ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT PROTECTED IN A BUILDING OR ON A ROOF SHALL UMTS 1900 4 VIOLET 4 WHITE 11. IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS OR WHERE SUSCEPTIBLE TO DAMAGE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FORMED GRIP STRUT COVER OVER COAXIAL CABLE ROUTES. WHERE CABLE IS TX 1/RX 1 TX 2/RX 2 UMTS 850 5 YELLOW 5 BLUE FORMED SHEET METAL COVER OR MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY ERICSSON INC. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. - 12. VENifY nUUlt AN LervGfH Of CAOLC PRION 'R/ WTlnv'3. AUuUiiT iivDICATCO ROUTE / AS REQUIRED TO CLEAR (E) EQUIPMENT AT FACILITIES. 13. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 7/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 140'-0'. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-1/4" COAX CABLE SHALL BE. 190'-0-. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-5/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 235'-0". N 14. VERIFY MODEL NUMBERS OF"ANTENNAS WITH ERICSSON INC. SERVICES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TESTING OF ANTENNAS AND SHALL PROVIDE - DOCUMENTATION TO THE ERICSSON INC. PROJECT MANAGER. 16. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL TORQUE TOLERANCES PER THE MANUFACTURERS / SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. SCALE: 3 GENERAL ANTENNA & CABLE NOTES .J FRA eleRome &o8o+HInc. Architecture &Telecommunications 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, Collfomla 92660 Phone: 949 760-3929 Fax: 949 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR THAT DISIMP T TED. STAMP C�A JE REYL. R7COME f EXP. at&t 4430 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACO & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE" AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD PROJECT NUMBER CN0890-A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO. CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING DATES "08/02/10 90% ZO REVIEW (P1). 08/23/10 10OX FINAL ZD'S (P2), _ RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN A-0 1 4. WHEN ANTENNA LINES ARE DIPLEXED, THE COLOR CODE OF THE HIGHEST FREQUENCY PREVAILS "(LE.'UMTS DIPLEXED WITH TDMA SHOULD HAVE COLOR 4 BANDS). S. ALL ANTENNAS AND -ANTENNA CABLE SHALL BE FURNISHED BY ERICSSON INC. AND \ INSTALLED BY ANTENNA INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR. 6. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANTENNA POLE MOUNTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE AZIMUTH AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PIANS MATCH ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. ' ALLOWABLE TOLERANCE: HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT = t5'; VERTICAL ALIGNMENT = -i:1'. /. I 7. ANTENNA INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL CONDUIT, CABLE TRAY, GROUNDS, ETC. FOR COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF ANTENNAS AND CABLES SHOWN AND INTENDED AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE OPERATING SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH ERICSSON INC. STANDARDS. \- 8. IN NO CASE SHALL THERE BE ANY MORE THAN TWO (2) 90' TURNS (OR EQUIVALENT) IN ANY CONTINUOUS LENGTH OF CONDUIT BETWEEN PULL BOXES OR SIMILAR FEATURES. \ 9. ANTENNA CONDUIT SHALL ONLY INCLUDE FACTORY -MADE LARGE RADIUS SWEEPS AT \ ALL CHANGES IN DIRECTION. SWEEP RADIUS SHALL BE 18" MINIMUM ABOVE GROUND \ AND 36" MINIMUM BELOW GROUND. \ \ 10. CONDUIT SHALL BE 3"0 MINIMUM. ALL UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC. ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SHALL BE IMC OR RIGID GALVANIZED. ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT PROTECTED IN A BUILDING OR ON A ROOF SHALL \ BE EMT OR UV STABILIZED PAINTED SCHEDULE 80 PVC. " 11. IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS OR WHERE SUSCEPTIBLE TO DAMAGE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FORMED GRIP STRUT COVER OVER COAXIAL CABLE ROUTES. WHERE CABLE IS RUN ON THE WALL, ATTACH UNISTRUT TO WALL AND COVER WITH 14 GA. GALVANIZED FORMED SHEET METAL COVER OR MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY ERICSSON INC. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. - 12. VENifY nUUlt AN LervGfH Of CAOLC PRION 'R/ WTlnv'3. AUuUiiT iivDICATCO ROUTE / AS REQUIRED TO CLEAR (E) EQUIPMENT AT FACILITIES. 13. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 7/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 140'-0'. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-1/4" COAX CABLE SHALL BE. 190'-0-. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-5/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 235'-0". N 14. VERIFY MODEL NUMBERS OF"ANTENNAS WITH ERICSSON INC. SERVICES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TESTING OF ANTENNAS AND SHALL PROVIDE - DOCUMENTATION TO THE ERICSSON INC. PROJECT MANAGER. 16. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL TORQUE TOLERANCES PER THE MANUFACTURERS / SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. SCALE: 3 GENERAL ANTENNA & CABLE NOTES .J FRA eleRome &o8o+HInc. Architecture &Telecommunications 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, Collfomla 92660 Phone: 949 760-3929 Fax: 949 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR THAT DISIMP T TED. STAMP C�A JE REYL. R7COME f EXP. at&t 4430 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACO & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE" AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD PROJECT NUMBER CN0890-A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO. CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING DATES "08/02/10 90% ZO REVIEW (P1). 08/23/10 10OX FINAL ZD'S (P2), _ RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN A-0 00 ENLARGED SITE PLAN KEYNOTES r— s� 0 1 ANOPOED (12)OAT&0• LATTICE ANTENNAS SECTOR, J SECTORS) MOUNTED ON - :g EXISTING CLEARWIRE LEASE AREA. 16 EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING LOT. O SECTOR 'A' 2 PROPOSED AT&T INDOOR 12'-0•-X20'-0• EQUIPMENT LOCATED WITHIN AN EXISTING BUILDING; SEE SHEET 1/A-1. 10 EXISTING METRO PCS LEASE AREA. 17 EXISTING COAX CABLE ENTRY PORT. MODIFY ENTRY PORT TO ACCOMODATE NEW COAX CABLES. 3 PROPOSED 18• WIDE SUSPENDED CABLE LADDER; 9'-0• ABOVE FINISH SURFACE. 10A OTHER CARRIER LEASE AREA (N) PANEL ANTENNA - . - TYPICAL (4) PER SECTOR. 4 PROPOSED CABLE BRIDGE. 11 EXISTING CABLE LADDER. EXISTING LATTICE TOWER. 5 PROPOSED GPS LOCATION. 12 EXISTING ENTRY DOOR. :a 6 PROPOSED POWER & TELCO CONDUIT ROUTE MOUNTED ON BUILDING WALL. PAINT TO MATCH BUILDING. 13 EXISTING BUILDING. - - 7 PROPOSED GROUND MOUNTED A/C CONDENSOR UNITS.1 14 EXISTING METRO PCS ELECTRICAL BACKBOARD PANEL. V � 8 EXISTING BUILDING OVERHANG. 15 EXISTING VERTICAL WALL MOUNTED AC UNIT. U ry Ix N I I NOTE: OTHER CARRIER ANTENNAS 16 OMMfTTED FOR CLARITY. ANTENNA PLAN VIEWSCALE: Z I 1/4"=1'-0" x — p y 4 ENLARGED SITE PLAN KEYNOTES I 4 5 1 PROPOSED (4) AT&T INDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED - x I ON EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR. - / \ 2 FUTURE (3) AT&T INDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS. - 3- PROPOSED 4'-D•x B' -0•x3/4' THK TELCO BACKBOARD WITH ' FIRE RETARDANT PAINT. MOUNT EXTERNAL ALARM TO BACKBOARD. 12'-0• 4 PROPOSED GROUND MOUNTED A/C CONDENSER. UNITS. AT&T LEASE AREA 17 5 PROPOSED ELECTRICAL PANEL MOUNTED TO EXISTING WALL 3 5 6 I 6 PROPOSED MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH MOUNTED TO WALL. \ I TY -TIC -111-I 3 7 PROPOSED AT&T ARGUS 24VDC RECTIFIER CABINET. 11 8 PROPOSED AT&T BATTERY. RACK. 16 11 _„ g 9 PROPOSED LTE MU MOUNTED INA 19' RACK. I. 10A ! �•�' 10 PROPOSED DATA RACK. 12 1 I �L I -;I OR RECEPACLE 11 MOUNTED TO PROPOSED EOUTSIDE OF BUIILBUILDING.G. _ 13 15 IT _ I� L -= I 12 PROPOSED 2A-I0BC FIRE EXTINGUISHER MOUNTED IN EQUIPMENT ROOM. II I I :13 PROPOSED EYE WASH AND� � < 2Ill FIRST AID KIT MOUNTED IN EQUIPMENT ROOM. Ll 17 L 2 - a x I 13 - I— 14 PROPOSED PARTITION WALL. ! 15 PROPOSED FIRE ALARM PANEL. lxxxxlxxxxxx = 16 PROPOSED 3'-0• WIDE. ACCESS .DOOR. ! 7 AR U . - I-� - 17 PROPOSED 12X12 VCT FLOOR WITH 4• RUBBER TOPSET WE. I p II XX4XXXXXXPjI 10 I 0 , x N N ENLARGED SITE PLAN SCALE: 3 ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN � SCALE: off, 3iSCALE: ,SCALE:oe 1 0, ,J RA Jeffrey Rome & Associates, Inc. Architecture &. Telecom municatlons 3 Son Joaquin Plaza, Suite. 155. Newport Beach, California 92660 Phone: (949)) 760-3929 Fax: (949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSUR THAN THAT WHICH TE„S ATBcT 081 CJI�RQ TED. P 7�%STAM L. ROME KXE�XP �Ir+o� sewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACO & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE. AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE. PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD PROJECT NUMBER CN0890-A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY _ DRAWING DATES 08/02/10 90% ZD REVIEW (P1): ,08/23/10 100% FINAL ZD'S (P2) RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE ENLARGED SITE PLAN A-1 ELEVATION KEYNOTES ELEVATION KEYNOTES 1 PROPOSED (121 AT&T ANTENNAS (4 PER SECTORS, ".3 SECTORS) ). - 1 PROPOSED (12) AT&T ANTENNAS (4 PER SECTORS, 3 SECTORS) MOUNTED ON !N EXISTING 130'-10 LATTICE TOWER. MOUNTED ON EXISTING 130'-10 HIGH LATTICE TOWER. 2 PROPOSED 12'-0" X 20'-0' AT&T LEASE AREA WITHIN 2 PROPOSED 12'-0" X 20'—O' AT&T LEASE AREA. EXISTING COMMERIAL TENANT SPACE. TOP OF EXISTING CLEARWIRE ANTENNAS. `TOP OF EXISTING CLEARWIRE ANTENNAS. - 130.80 3 PROPOSED AT&T VERTICAL CABLE ROUTE. 130.80 A.G.L. A.G.L. 3 PROPOSED CABLE ROUTE. 7 5 4 PROPOSED CABLE BRIDGE MOUNTED FROM EXISTING BUILDING TO LATTICE TOWER. c� 4 EXISTING LATTICE TOWER. 5 PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA LOCATION. - 5 EXISTING CLEARWIRE ANTENNAS. 6 CENTER OF EXISTING METROPCS ANTENNAS. CENTER OF EXISTING METROPCS ANTENNAS. 6 EXISTING LATTICE TOWER. — — — —11-8.— 118.00 A.G.L. 00 A.G.L. -. — — 6 EXISTING METRO PCS ANTENNAS. 7 EXISTING CLEARWIRE ANTENNAS. U 7 EXISTING WHIP ANTENNAS. - - TOP OF EXISTING WHIP ANTENNAS.\ TOP OF EXISTING WHIP ANTENNAS. g EXISTING SATELfTE DISH. 8 EXISTING METRO PCS ANTENNAS. 110.00 A.G.L. 110.00 A.G.I. 9 EXISTING WHIP ANTENNAS. O - 7 9 EXISTING 6'-0' CHAINUNK FENCE OVER CONCRETE PAD. 10 EXISTING SATELITE DISH. FW 10 EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING. 11 EXISTING 6'-0" CHAINUNK FENCE OVER CONCRETE PAD. 11 PROPOSED (2) 2' DIAMETER MICROWAVE DISHES. 12 EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING. II L 13 PROPOSED (2) 2' DIAMETER MICROWAVE DISHES. TOP OF (N) AT&T ANTENNAS. L TOP OF (N) AT&T ANTENNAS. - - 87.20 A.G.L. 87.20 A.G.L. CENTER SOF (N) AT&T ANTENNAS CENTER OF (N) AT&T ANTENNAS. 1 I Illi! ILLWllJ I_ifffff 85.00 A.G.L.(t 85.00 A.G.L. 111 .IG,hll nr�!_ °4!� CENTER OF (N) MICROWAVE ANTENNAS. CENTER OF (N) MICROWAVE ANTENNAS. Iwo, 13 N 80.00 A.C.L. 80.00 A.G.L. ON (Hill, dal elpl !W!7 ullll I(II .1,•, C Nit fi!i!h 7!Ir! o o fiG!7 lu Higil eta '0 fi�jt ji !2 ifi� O O �IIII! iPI!fi To m li!!pl lil�l lililU . ill 0 11 �--- <6 L97! �i!!! 4 fill; � •tip' MON c "n ,. o Inl, 3 i01! m VI m N J!�1 uJ� o m a, o i14U! ml 'Hic !Nrl fi!i1 nom: !"Ill gl:!g a, ggNi. 12 2 Villfill li!rfi q, rh!! m!ai Nlim !a"fi Gt01! F �- ., .. I .' , • I .. ', OP OF CONCRETE (EI PAD. TOP OF CONCRETE (E) PPD. , ... .. .� . ' ! TOP OF F.S. ob TOP OF F.S. .. 0.00 A.G.L. - .. - 0.00 A.G.L.. , , 1 9 O 10 .. NORTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE. 2 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE -: _j ® 1/4"=1'-0" 0 2' 4' 1/4"=1'-0" 0 2' 4' Jeffrey Rome k Associates, Inc. Architecture & Telecom munlcotions 3 Son Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Naw port Beach. Califomla 92660 Phone: (949) 760-3929 _ Fax: (9 49) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OROISCLO.URE_OIHER THAN THAT HIGH T _Tp AT.T IL 1fPijO.l�-I TED. STAMP JEFFR �. DOME C—p876 W r Q W�, �tm 4430 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACO & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD PROJECT NUMBER CN0890—A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD' CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING DATES 08/02/10 902 ZD REVIEW (PI) ,08/23/10 1002 FINAL ZD'S (P2) RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE NORTHWEST & SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS A-2 ,J RA - Architecture &. Telecommunications 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, California 92660 . Phone: (949) 760-3929 Fax: (949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AT&T MOBILITY PROHIBITED. AR STAMP �^ EY �. ACME JEF G ZOB76_ i P . Q 4430 Rose- d Drive Pleasonton, Cal' ornia 94588 ' APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACQ & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE, AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD - PROJECT. NUMBER CN0890-A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING.DATES 08/02/10 90% ZD REVIEW (P7) 08/23/10 1008 FINAL_ZD'S (P2) RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE NORTHWEST ELEVATION T 0 K m 2 O �LE: 3 l'-0" a 0 2' 4' :f ELEVATION KEYNOTES • 1 PROPOSED (1 2) AT&T ANTENNAS (4a PER SECTORS, 3 SECTORS) MOUNTED ON IN EXISTING 130'-10 HIGH LATTICE TOWER. 2PROPOSED 12'-0' X 20'-0` AT&T LEASE AREA WITHIN . EXISTING COMMERIAL TENANT SPACE. 3 PROPOSED CABLE ROUTE. 4 PROPOSED CABLE BRIDGE MOUNTED FROM EXISTING BUILDING TO LATTICE TOWER. 5 PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA LOCATION. 6 EXISTING LATTICE TOWER. 7 EXISTING CLEARWIRE ANTENNAS. 8. EXISTING METRO PCS ANTENNAS. 9 EXISTING WHIP ANTENNAS. �- 10 EXISTING SATELITE DISH. 11 EXISTING 6'-0' CHAINLINK FENCE OVER CONCRETE PAD. 12 EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING. v 13 PROPOSED (2) 2' DIAMETER MICROWAVE DISHES. - ,J RA - Architecture &. Telecommunications 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, California 92660 . Phone: (949) 760-3929 Fax: (949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AT&T MOBILITY PROHIBITED. AR STAMP �^ EY �. ACME JEF G ZOB76_ i P . Q 4430 Rose- d Drive Pleasonton, Cal' ornia 94588 ' APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACQ & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE, AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BLD - PROJECT. NUMBER CN0890-A 3415 SILVERBELL ROAD CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DRAWING.DATES 08/02/10 90% ZD REVIEW (P7) 08/23/10 1008 FINAL_ZD'S (P2) RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.1 SHEET TITLE NORTHWEST ELEVATION T 0 K m 2 O �LE: 3 l'-0" a 0 2' 4' Legend FS FINISH SURFACE NOM FENCE No �•o- LINK FENCE PoI� POLE LIGHT RETA9fINC//gBLLOOK WAC. ® WA TO vALH- O NAV G`ON/ROL PONT TOP TLP OF STRUCTURE FX -171 CONCRE-M PAHWENT 0 GEODETIC COORDINATES EDGE OF PAYEYONT 1® YA8 BOK O DPEF toy FINE MARANT1YIRE TicIOP O' dlRB ER ELECTRIC BOX - HRO IO UNE EM LRECMC METER Title Report PREPARED BNA® VALLEY DT7E & ESCROW COIOoANY ORDER NO: OWI -5443888 DATED, AIN& 14 2010 Legal Description REAL PROPERTY IN WE UNfNCORPORAIM AREA OF TINE COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALRORN/A DESCRIBED AS FOLONT LOT 1, AS SHONN ON THAT CERTAIN YAP ENDRtD, 'NOMSDE 978GN90N NIDD/ NAP WAS FEED IN INE OFFICE OF 7HE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTM STATE OF CAUFOW" ON APRIL A 1984 IN BOOK 72 OF YAPS. AT PAWS) M AND 41 Assessor's Parcel No. 007-590-001 Easements ORESOLUTION ESTABLISHING N000SWE SMELT UGRING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT RECORDED JANUARY 20, 1981 IN BOOL 2584 PAGE 458 OR (m ANIOIT IN m4nkV ®BREIDN ar /0 SWENTT 94 � (PLo� JANUARY 2A 1961 IN ©ROINOD9rYENT GE ABUTTERS RIGHTS RECCROED JUNE 4. 1964 IN BOOK IJ17, PAGE 468 OR (PLOTTED HEREON) (H ©)ONS RESERVATIONS AS SET FORTH ON SAW YAP. ATTED AIEREM OAGE SRIS AND EASELNNONTS MAY J4 1980 IN BODY 2518 DR. (PLOTTED NEREIGNI Access Route THAT PCR7I0Y GE LOT 1, IN THE MUXTY OF BUTTE STATE GE CALIFORNIA As SHONN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP EN71TIM 'NDMSIGE SUBSTMO V. *M YAP WAS FEED GV ME OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, ON APRIL 4 1984 IN BODY M OF YAPS AT PAGE(S) 44 AND 44 BONG A STRIP OF LAND, 1200 FEET NDE LTiNG 800 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF NE FQU.OKNG DESCRIBED CEN ERIINE U(WI@/UNG AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1, SAID PONT BONG ON A CURT£ C0Xr4W NORTHEASTERLY, HAMNG A RADIUS OF &FOOD FEET, A RADIAL LINE IHROVGH SAID POINT BEARS N731110.49'E; 7NENLE NORNNESIERLY ALONG SAID OIURI£ THROUGH A CENNIRAL ANGLE OF 57614: AN ARC DISTANCE OF 81.22 FEET M THE POINT OF BEGNNAN4 A RADIAL UNE THROUGH SAID POINT SEARS SB07712'1M 17ENGE 5797656"X( 244.63 FEEL 7NENCE 57454"22'& 4064 FEET TO INE END OF SAID SIMP, TNFNCE 53/7517'6 21M FEET 70 A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED 70 AS PONT 'A': Lease Area BEGNFANG AT PONT A" AS DESO680 ABO 10E.' (HENCE 514*4rJ6'& 2a 00 FEET,' )HENCE S7312 -241K 1200 FEET MEN(E N14V7.391% 2000 FFEO DFENCE X737214'& 1200 FEET TV THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COITAINNG 240 SCUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS Utility Route BEING A STRIP OF LANA AGO FEET NIDE LYING 250 FEET GN EACH SDE OF TILE FOLONNG DESCRIBED CIENIERUNE BEGINNING AT POINT A" AS DESdRIZIM A901£ THENCE 5141739'E 2000 FEEq IHENOE saM54'M( 7.91 FEET TO IW TRUE PMIT OF BEGINNING THENCE S/11736'& 250 FEET, THENCE N757214'& 18880 FEET TO THE END OF SVD SIR'P Geographic Coordinates at Existing Lattice Tower 19M DAR M LATITUDE J9' 46'2&47W LONGITUDE 121. 52' t7,57'W ELEVATION - 1710 FEET ABOW ADEAN SEA LEVE. Basis of Bearings DR STATE PLANE COORDWYE SYSTEM OF 1993 (NAD Wj CILIF'URMAI ZONE 2 Bench Mark WE NGS CPS POINT Na '/(57106' ELEVATION - 251.82 FEET (NAM 86) CERIVI:ATIok 7HE LA177LIDE AND LCNG7UDE 90WV ABOW ARE ACCURATE W Ili 4/- 15 FEET HORIZONTALLY AND THAT TW ELEYARONS SHONE ABOVE AGE ACOIARATE TO WHIN 4/- J FEET FERMALLY. THE HORGEMIAL DA7UY (GEOGRAPHIC MORLKIVA76) IS IN FEW OF THE NORTH AMBRICAN OANY OF I9W (NAD 6J) AM IS EIPRERLD IN WOW (fit Date of Survey MINUTES () AND S7"COEWS ('� TD THE AZ4REST HUNDREDN OF A SECCEW. THE IIERTICAL DATUM (ELEVATIONS) IS IN TEWYS GE PE NORTH AWMCAN W R71CAL OATIDI A&Y 14, 2IN0 GE 1999 (NAM 68) AND IS DETERMINED M INE NEAREST TENTH OF A FOOT. 1 1 A.P.N. 007-390-026 _ �I- -I 1 176s4rc 279^0910' I.JSRP 1 11 9819551 d 1 1 96!0+ 1+'� GLWAGE .. ,,. ... :.. .,. .,. •' N _ 227 0 FAg10NT .. .. •.. ,. ••� 176.03 E07M BLOLONC 1y lo' 1 a.OE •.. '. ". i 176.97!3 dO6NG 19/7 I0°':,'ii i„"' '• m 1 b. ■176.71!3 •!76.605 i I l76.46A9 1 Ea1SI M0 BLRDNC 8176.66FS 76. 176.5ssD AT&T if E_ _ Po8 T 7 LOT ■176605 11.9E �- 176.6 . 217 D WOODSIDE SUBDIVISION ASFFMT 176.SSrs76.55&5 Cl) \ 8 M.B. 72/44-01 ____-3-9.3 WT44.6J' ___ 76.42FS•• A.P.N. 007-390-001 1=j 66 , 176 7M, 9 0176.J21S _--- _ 176.19! _--�176.l6rs - -_ --� •176.47rs 8 9 } OMA14AO --- -'-' _--� ■176.50'5 ■ 9 j EASEIOHT \01759615 \ I7576rs X1758475 \\ �T7S77rs •,76.12rs 8175.66rs 1 I7 69Nb X10• MAWS 17586!5 I7S92l5 `�\ - �P /10002 \\. "^\ \ .,,.■ ... 1191.19 I FD '176..19!5 176.0 0 �Y5 4176.26rs 1 J j ..1 \L3 M \ Ix 76.2110 >_.1 N EXISTING LATTICE TOWER N2 ,,,, GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES I77 /, i'i "i770KiF •%:; I&W5 T- 39'482847 N 1� '� il�.G..',i% �3 / \ ENG.- 12152'17.57'W (N� ,7511!5 '1665170' ,mss; A' EA7SIING BCQLOM"i "At -,/ /i / / P.00 107.7610P ,,. •i• _ / 1t\057D° \ f1'G ART 17166NG ' TRIM LOW AR.1 %•:::::: iii ••''�)j/TS)!' / \ / - LOT 2 A.P.N. 007-390-002 / SII II II 11759Y3 Lattice Tower Profile EASIEM.Y E3EVA11(IN (OTS) LINE TABLE LINE# DIRECTION LENGTH U S14- IY.8t MDY a S7FIrLVW Um IJ MF 47.BY 8100' .. L4 ARS ITJNE 12AY LJ SSaT 21 xv, me 4y JBE 15y .ir L7x V Z z 2 T. 1 � N SII GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 FEET 01 ,J RA Jeffrey Rome & Associates, Inc. Architecture & Telecommunications 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Beach, California 92660 Phone: 949 760-3929 Fax: 949 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AT&T MOBILITY IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. CONSULTANT CAIVADA SURVEYING, INC. 411Jmb Cr,SFAs205,Cm aVW Pv :951-29DM F=951.710974e TJF-:80)CAVADA ww.�-r6.mn JOB NO. 10511 PREPARED FOR ate 4430 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. DATE SAC AND ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE AT&T CM DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME CHICO BANK BUILDING PROJECT NUMBER CN0890 3415 SILVERSELL ROAD, CHICO, CA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY DATE DESCRIPTION BY 07/20/10 SUBMITTAL MN 08/03/10 TITLE REPORT / FINAL RAS SHEET TITLE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY C-1 SHEET 1 OF 1 c� C� %Q Ct O O U o O � . N 0 00 O U Existing Coverage with Proposed CNU0890-A (85') 08130,2010 Ex,lit!nqAT.&T Sites Vt y �'.• r. 'Ii 'w� • I 1 s It JET NO �4 >s- L '��. f f 1k r �r•5 WW li—IF Sm o �— '\ :''r"" .`> ♦ � .`1ti�a:.. � '#`�i'(;ir'_. Aq i r a Y,;Y,y� ��i`i:.k "' a...i �� ��J�`a �yt�.C� r'." !.� �;�: ��� +I a �� •�+gpr �� 't\ �� .� �i��� }– + r` •s �a �y �``.. ". "� f`1"� :9� j1 .;,'iY+- � r ' °'trnr� %a�. �''r ,1 .... j �' { '�' .k . �—`•r ��1 , ' y.�f'1 rrt i .r ts�. r� •ai k.`r *; . -,a. T� --',�.; �j ' `"• � iY. �v � �. t_ a t .t � Vii• 1i r" >j't¢. L�`k� ".rrA� �r. - ls...• ' ,1 y t 14 a ►° Zr�.yy�.^•y ',� ��' � ��id `Iti.,. .r�,;`rd w:� � ♦,or �,.'; .p �k�-��,�"; mow, � ��,,i