Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNEAL ROAD SANITARY (2)Oil "; i! 1 irk � 14, 4 a Yr { lV 4 e 1 %1 POO fx A DIEL . rINVESI'IGATION 1 'I I a, , u I r ry I e' I t 4 . " • I Y I' Al F Ij b A � � y L PL T If PROJECT NUMBER 31271.1 130:131NO NO. BY ,RA D:. DATE 7-3-79 SURFACE ELEV. 180— CLA5SIFICAIION'LaA7A FIr:LQ DAA u e a m m v - c a E DESCRIPTION 90 Finds Liquid Y MAW- c1ty comprds• siva Penetre• bion; (•�1d.Z00j Limit Index (TSp1: SAO: (�31ows/ Ft.) �' G y Dark brown CLAY weathered gray -.brown "SANDSTONE 10 Bark brown SANDSTONE wittl brace ; of red -brown sI ceou s SHALE t; Tan siliceous SHALE 20 In terl ayered brown SANDSTONE and SHALE s Light brawn SANDSTONE with 30 '; trace of SHALE Inter1 ayered siliceous vat Dani c _�► .: , y,nrlr' .anri CANnC,T(1NF _ , Kin 531 Ytalii,...ove.vr,y0vt,rs.rCd.)': aOVni R]s 1 `tfdi'J COPY _ Sace"ell X`f^ -• •--� ^--- �: r'T 8` AT9 OF CPlLl>"Cat►i okl (11) w,u' LOG: OWNER: +'u�.'�s9 �iIIA��'v.,"TYte"''>t'it�1r89tt+'io:O�p C�/�C;r1L.a1.L° t Total depth, 11�.�% !r, f5t7thotLomtil■rrd.rdl + .�.� fs«, i . e rlcidresa ii >O;S :S� 1r x°AS%�x �fj .� V��i 9 Form■tioa! DeFc for by rotW!`b.ttifrr. ll:I of •irinl;t,.nJ ctf■{I■N+ — t � t 2 -----= _ ri�3 A74 r•� I� (2) LOCA it01`4 OF IT.Z.: as C. 11 L v cZ Cryrafnr'+ nicLtxbat, tlyatrt-- p / f {.. —11- C •,. t i .L�Lr�Ja�.� R ar Scant :lo. .---�' . /+�. ���: Af U.3 .�7 _ D ---' 1'/2 ,-'� t C (° ��. _2 �: p ro wil n?' gm 1 ,t a a _ .....r..-,.._dw.. y Wil., yQ l M �or r' �( - , ! . - f }yrli?LS7A Lx(''t x Mal ^ J,1...?.M1•....,..��..kL=FL•.i.s'++.-..-..�-..r.w•.-�.-....•wL..a.••:,' Ne dL n 8ca tC . . ,• " r � st o�sh � . *rrtiitirtr7ll,t�lcriGotr+tteciwLittrl�tutralusvinoltxr.il. o- USES (c kook) . (5) EQUJYM T:cic] CRO:00SED Ind,�3txizl ❑ MttayicaLx�l ❑ Ro ❑. Cable) Irrig!t. Cl Testfi�ill ❑ Otber ❑ Du Well ❑ ----- SIxG_ TrI"� If rae1 =kcd Yi1 g " " 9i cj. DQUO t n.: N .�] ti■aa ar a pi,a■trr from to fer - ry - f; rid �'S^i Typr rad ru of ti,w or tom' � � :��»� If .tll B Sis�'oF tnndf .......�..,.........-........ �. Da joint i C liar rpt l r+rZ° RFOR.A� LC�NS e A ,, •� p;rfo`ncoi on� `x1,•%:'i � � „- ... .. - , rl - _____.,n , s .5 (wr. ,fnntient Frnssda 7M ft Pte% Pcrf. wr ?�� , , R'owt p■r Fc. °, ni C s cors.' AUC n Rid t wrtiu s■aifidy raj pfr' , ? I� Ya D N"Yo trl,at �pt6 fi ' . -� not. �■ptl� of ■rht i . 'fin. jYo 1F.7!s. �■t v }tjiti ieara� iauart pviratsoMl , � , DI. :.....-.....•-�• •' , - - - .. fi Compleitf ii !9 4 Vr.LTj DRILL l9 T tkT�.Q Y, � Ji: y T�iir will soot ii rlllyd urt!er my furifd/elitm and ljw rrpprl of ir•ad to, he drrt Of ' 'fe, `xaitii ^ittet.'+jr fint;laaad 'n� �Cisowlrrl�t pnd �irlirf L {, t !t: t p RIftri b2taN-Pttior$Sia/� 2 ;, .. ... NAME jCt(4 0i ar3.0', klIperxuu'�C ' iTVbid nrp!tnitJJ , ra; i■.■t ifttr`,ptefarit{itp : riry'w A dress ti u u ,.r ♦ R.t G.is �(J,® Gi,� /- j. �x'tt�tima ttt: mtd.i *1 it arm l.fr t;Y . .'� ^t.Y'.',.,^v'�• "- __� _ k fa: dt■w down }Iter 1+/i• �� ctf rr6 Drtifrr —T � ICT1eU�. .-.....,:. .. a_.,.«..._..........:��,.-... vid R■1.rola: e, Y Yiddx I " % a 1,;t� Vt+■r ; <Hrmif�l aaiiy;lt •ntdrt :4.J Yt1 � 'VO � en itatr t, _ Li:trtst �O.J.:�Y � !'�� -,:.a Dr t:ti,. '+`7.t ter Ir, M: �„ � ...•w', r 1 3 + „�� j� vv Ne pA 4 A o d ��� tr'i• ttfz{b; foidrnf rrfl,! Cl Yt+ ..r't'." rsbaa +.ii so; ou1N s TEST PIT DATA DEPTH OF SOIL DEPOSITS - a (See Drawing 1 for Test Pit Locations) - Surf 1cial (;layey Soil Clayey Matrix with:,Cobbles* Test Pit No, Thickness (ft,)_ Thickness (ft.) 1 2,5 0.5 0, 5 3 _ 2, 0 0.5 �- 5 - 1.0 - 2.0 1.0 7 2.5 ' - �'- g 5.0 - ;, 10 4,5 x_0 12 1�0 0,5 13 140' 2.0 14 15 2.0 ... 16 1.0 -- 17 1:5 18 1g 0.5 2 0 0.5 -- 22 2,0 3.0 23 0.5 . - 2,4 1,0 2b0 25 2,0' 3.5 , 2 6 2� 5 *Clayeat,' lx with cobbles underlies surficial clayey soil. r , w Pl ate .A-5 dY PARADISE SEISMIC SURVEY PREPARED FOR" EMCON & ASSOCIATES SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA ®® PREPARE;D 13,Y: i GASCH & ASSOCIATES, ING, ConauMkt6 in,, Geoph.yzic� 9 Geotogy SACRAMENTO, CAL IrORNIA �. ' ROJ ECT f 11MB ► c GA717 I1AY, 19 8 y Paradise Seismic Survey Project Number: GA717 Geophysical Survey (Continued . affect a time vs. distance plot. Gasch'& Associates, Inc. cannot gUarantee that the geophysical `n- formation i'n thi report reveals all conditions that will ;be encountered. Our iniorma:tion pertains only to the 'particular areas on the original groUriti surface from which this information was obtained. It must be under stood that this isite is composed of geology which may have considerable vertical and lateral variability, andthat weathering or fracturing and other minor, features may be encountered that cannot be detected with re� fraction seismic techligUes. Conclusions _ At can be seen in the Summary�of pefraetion Seismic Data (Table 1)1 lines 2 and.4 were conducted on;sha11,ow� high voloci y, essentially noir= rippable materia'`1. Seismic Line. 3 was the only line,completed within the canyon which showed the possibil,;'ity of materials suitable for cut and fill operations.Seismic Lines 8, 6, and 7; performed south of the canyon; showed five (5) to. (10) feet of light to moderately rippable material. y 3 IPara,dise :Seismic Surrey Project Number: GA717 We hope this data and au.r interpretation probe useful for making project decisions. If you have a ny questions regartling this report or its data please feel free to contact our office: We thank you for this present npportun1ty'to be of service. � e ctfulIy su.bmitted,_ �.R.' . er ie W. rasch, President i e stered Geologist #1203 Stephen R. Clark istered`Geophysici'st #516 Geologist Engineering Geologist #450 JWG/S_RC/dis I� i 1 1 TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF REFRACTION SEISMIC DATA SEISMIC LINE GENERAL LLNE AVERAGE VELOCITY AVERAGE MAXIMUM APPROXIMATE"DEPTH NUMBER" DIRECTION OF REFRACTORS ft sec kEFRACTORSF ft TO MATERIAIPpABLE L (ft 1 E NOTES Interfere, -,.,e from high -- vo tagepolder line , 2 E W 1,660. S W.+ E 13,330' 4000 5 5 Large joint or 11 thiol ogy change in mudfloW 20 000 3 5$.710' S5 60 Moder6te,t6L heavy r'pping N '`' S 20, 000 4,000 r - beneath entire 1 i ne. be1 q►V L. 5 feet. a com Mor 8,000 2, 70 e p tent beneath sou end'. 20,; 000 4 L + W 5, 660 ' 45 3 W E. 13 330 3,330 3 +Join s..or ; I tho1 ogy changes in mudf1oW. Marginal ri,p- 8',,000 <' �0 Ping: rn west end. Hayy 1"3,33Q; ripPn9 oe ea�st� end:` (Tab,le 1 con, tnued';an riek page TABLE' .1 (Conti nued): SUMMARY OF REFRACTION SEISMIC DATA AVERAGE SEI,SMIG GENERAL AVERAGE VELOCITY MAXIMUM APPROXIMATE DEPTH LINE LINE OF DEPTH OF TO NON-RIPPABLE' NUMBERDIRECTION RBFRF�TQR5 ,(,ft sec REFRACTORS. (fta, MATFF,'iAL ft NOTES 5 L.+ w 21000 10 N 10. Large joints or litholoyy - 8,890 changes in mudflow. W +E x,130 20 Thicker surfici'al materials 13,330' on gest end. 6 S + N 2,000` 3 c 20 Large joints or litholoyy 4,200 60 changes in mudflow. 10,000 Thicker surfical materials N + 5 3,570 20 on south end. 2D,000 ,S,+��N 2,,500 5 - 5 LArge jo.l nts o:r 1ithology 11',400 changes in mudflow. N + 5 3,330 10 Slightly thickdr suiwficial 7,500 materials on north end: FIGURE 1tow. eo: df h111.1! 1 Y1N . !fl .K aM! Ynl 1 I it tla f ^^M y . SII � �L r rnnu,r `�,J + .i— — Q wrr.•.-=o 7EN�iMA 6U7TE ��� � 31 o r (aa! Alrtll, / bti f - wl b P d tOlf/A tlUhO ` 10of s,wl rp f $ 1 + + c 17 ' a ' �c � . y I ' O' '1 d!' RRhndsoii _ Si»pr � •' IWO hIHI • ..P ._ K r' '�+� • L� '.. ii 'e I,5 r � K f Rr,r I4 PY '. ) P4 b 1 -<. J �(� �+ YY M0.i11 UI�, rm � pr l• �:,m.wu,L m •p '.,: � �t � . �.S Cenlm�lle ♦± .m Q 1.3 .�,� .�- \ Parfdiu C nMr Chic n .. y rNrl P f. r,.»r 1� • MkAAO a Q r o,s NL,I R y.0 yo '� S ITE Y t ': xi 3,5 , A Qry1Pe s _.:i Q ie>att'1 : 1 � r CO,: � P*nDI d � _.1.. nn! : l ti ,•�'S � 73 ro.S�NPW � TS m �dDehA� nrr •..r fro a �';. r or „ 16 ip d r R +G ? ♦� n � g J S_, ':' ♦1 w.roa m. it ID 1 1.l 6 i! 1 ur1F /, Rriw, it Of 41 : 4 1 C a A s i I61 IO I. All k,N Rr. o,w.ow'y 11 IID P... PD '. �.' ,.. rj ►"'�'i.sq s,s n.rr Q IDY •6 alMp �' � � . 3 I. u a i � a � � IrI 01,! IU(•,1 n n r .,'..� 6 I'IJ1:p4 ♦ •• Vo•wll,/` '. i.e PL iN ,��r{{��,��� "+`O• iw Ir b,�.uyytl.e � 2 y G � P n rr It -A. � r �° ' 10 a Ml in I11, r' ►" C 7 PUTN [Rl - 1 /nrV Z' �S j 'mit r .1 � Q r 1, 1 rwro. 1MY�11J• lu. W ,j � p w r. a3 ,,, �'. pP1am0 -..x .�. nwW � • � i'�g,'.; �.� p t M � LQ � p n ,I �4 � 1<'� ,i r PAR/�nISE 5ETSMIC SUV, GASB# I /4SSQ!CiAT� Geoptiysics[Geotogy Index Map w► 4302tadisort- Ave,; Socramento,CA 95842 u;34— 8400 Ree 1 o t No,,64,717 ©fite:5 22 78`. STATE OF CALIFORNIA—kESOURCES AGENCY ^y_ _ _ EDMUN16 O3 BROWN JR" Goveroor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME REGION 2 1701 NIMBUS ROAO, SUITE A , ntrlrah�nd�ifinl Rwijow ! RANCHOCORI)OVAj CALIFORNIA" 95670 (916) 555-1030JUL 2 ! 1980 gui�i �aun+y July 17, 19$0 Mr. Earl D., Nelson Environmental Review Dirac or Butte County EnVIronmental Review U-I' County Center Drive Oroville,; CA 9596$ beat Mr.. Nelson; The Department",o"f Fish and Game has reviewed the Notice of Preparation of a dzaft EIA for the Neal Road Sanitary sand Filip SCH $0061704. The be part� men't concerns relate to leachate control measures th'a will ensure"pzotection of water quality. "Thank you .fot the opportunity to review this NOF. Sincerely> - (Obert,`Wi Lassen - Regional Manager cc: Offiee of"Planning and Research' CVRWQ;CB SEl_EC TING A4. -.A L T E R N A3 IV EXAMPLE A, AITtRNATIVES, 1)NEW DFIll., LANDFILL SITE, 2) 7RANSF ER. TO DISTANT LAN )RESOURCE RECOVERY $ :-RITERIA: 1) COSI; 2) RECQVERY'OF REsouRCES ) ENVIRON M ENTAL IM PACTS, 4)OuEoC ACCEPTANCE iGHTiNO COST- 40%, RA _ 20%, ENV -107; PUB.- 30% Do D ATA;; CRITERIA. NEW LANbFDL TRANSFER R/R COST PER TON $4/TON $D/TON X10/TON RECOVERY 100:1) 80% CA MOUNT RE M AINING) 20%. ENV, I M PACT M ODERATE (6) LOW (4) HIGH (10) PUBi ACCEPT,, Lo (1Q) MODERATE ($) HIGH (2) E, P UT ON C 0 M MON B'ASIS;; CRITERIA NSW' LANDFIl],.. TRA___ NsFFR R/R cosi. 4/20 = 0.2 10/20 0.5 REcovERY 100/200 = 0.5 80/200 - 0, 4 201200 - 0,1 ENVY I'M PACT G/2003 - 4/20 - 002 10/20 = 0,5 - PUB, ACCEPT. 1012.0 = 0 5 9/20'= GI 2/20 = Oel ' , A NALYSISg FACTOR W.T NEW SIT TRANS-ERRESOURCE RECOVERY COST 0,4 0.2 '' 0,08 0►3 0,12 0,5 0,20 0,10 014 0'0$ 0.1 0,02 El�V, 'IMPACT 01.1 013 :0103 0,20.02 0 5'. 0,05 puB, ACCEPT,, '0.3 0,5 015 0,4 0.12. �0,1�' 0,03. G► -b EClstoN; la, ARE; THE, D"IF,EREN'CES SUFFI'CIEMTLY `SIGNIFICANT, b INDICATC= A CLEAR CHOICE., IF. DATA IS 10�.; TH N DIFFERENCE MUST lE- AT -T LEA5T THATTO" BE SIGNIFICAN;T�F NOT,..; ELIhINATE LEAST DESIRABLE AL'TERNATIVES AND �Do- M'ORE� `'DEF=INITIVE RMA I�N I NO At. T 5 R NAT I VES a STUDY ` ON ' ARE THERE ANY INTANGIBLE CRITERIA THAT WERE QUA'NTIF TABLE? USE JUDGMENT TO TEMPER MATHEMATICAL `GHT NOT SOLUTION I N" L I "OF SOC !A /P0 T T I",CALREAL IT I EB page22 page 5