HomeMy WebLinkAboutNEIGHBORHOOD CHURCH OF CHICO SEWAGE DISP. PERMITa
' .{
� �1
.� _
.
\
'1. a
��
:
'�.H'
4
'
M
I
'�..'. �..� ..' oaf r
� �
'.�{e.. � .. .. � �w.�.
Y �
� .l+s-, . _ �l�.l. t`- J+""'
li -
I�
'. � �
1
�
'
r
/.
�.t)
L1
'
�
.. �
\
..
' .�.
� .`�
i iy
-
_
� -
w
� ,
�
,
�
^'.
•� ,
• f
'
,'.
i .
,a
f
� I'.
�, A '
`',
,�!.
A
\,;. .,
i' �` �Y.
.i
e
`7
�.
. ',�
�"
n
� .eY
_ - ,
.,
� 4
A•
� �.
�
r
�. 1.
11
..
�.
n
• •
��
,
�
tl
� nn
� `
Iy. y
���,
n,
:.war ,...
APPENDIX G
NEGATI _
DECLARATION RE GARBING FIWTRONMENTAL ZMFA0T
NOTICE IS NFKFRg GIVEN that the praeet described belOW has
been: reviewed pursuant' to the provisions of the CaliEorn�,a
Environmental Quality Act of '1970 (Public Resources C'e�do
2'1'100,
;et se , � and a determination has been .made that it will
not have >a significant effort upon the environment.
2.
DE8CRIPTI0N0 ' PRC?JECT: Log-11—ol
Sewage Disposal Permit for new sa7ctuar7
AP # 40-03•-2,6 and 3
,3.
LOCATION OF PROJECT:
3�1 acres just, east of Highway -99,a nd, appraxim,ately 1,800
feet south of the Skyway Notre
on Dame Blvd. , southOhiea.
4.
riAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT:
orhaod Church
Neghbof Chico Eco -Analysts
28Q1 Notre 7�ame 8'1v d.
P. Q. Bow ll'$�j
Chico,. CA 95 26 Ohco., CA
Atten•t;von: 6y..Johnson 959V ,y
5.
�'IITIGATI ON MEASC]RES
,
6.A
copy of the Environmental' Review Da.rector's initial study
regarding the environmental Affect of this
This tudy was project is attached,
Adopted 'as presented.
Adoptedchanges. Specifi,F modifications and
suppartin.g reasons are attached.
?.
It
A public` hearing :on this Negative Decloration was held by the
decision making body.
Nearing body Bute Caunty `.Envirb=0hta�:.Nealth Officer
Date of Delaermnat9:on ;.
Determination:
On the oasis of the Eironment&l Directors initial. study,
the informatian presented at .hearings, cameras
re;�;eyerl on. tie
Proposal and. our own knnwled e
g and ii
'dependent res;earch:.
A�apendix G page 1 of 2
PERSONS 'CONTACTED
Bob Jones
Butte County' Department o£ Puklic Works
Bob Gaiser
Butte County Department ot, Advance p�,arinanc
Doug Gills
City of ;Chico . Traff. Eng,neei
Ray Ro1is
"Rolls, Anderson end• R61128 Civi1 engineers
Ray Jo, hnsonRepr'esentat~
IVO' for Ve ghborhtac d Ch uxch of Chico
FIood 'Chatham:Project
Architect
FtEFERBNCES
i Butte Comity
General P1an. -
Soils Survey
of the Chico Area, .U.S bepartment Of, agriculture, 1929.
11th Progress Report an; itftlp. Ends Generat ipji 'IResearch Counts,
Caltrans, July
1,976:
= Neighbozhaod.--hurrh
Master. Flan, 19 8:
k
j,
I H
ti N
j
page 13,
.,..
4. 7
APPENDIX y+ '
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK'GT;ST FORM�t
(To be completed by Z','ead Agency)
�RD' T,ng '04 17QI
I , BACKGROUND
Name o£ Proponent. Nei" hborho.od' Church of Gh co
er, Proponent-:
2. Address and Phone Num
2801. No-bre Daznre Blvd.
Box
C:r; r CA. 9�7�2c� Ch Ca CA 9592
A tent�on: Ray Johnscfh
3 Date o Checklist Subtw,L ted "
,
Agency Requiring Checklist -
';fplica a 8evrage D19 riosal. Perm" -t fog
o pxa o s al a- --------
5 , Name p ,
r'
---
II. ENZRONMENTAL I'ACTS�ril �� "ma be" answers are required r t
all yes and Y
(Eplanations of
}
on attached sheets:}
YES MAYBE: ,
N�1 .
1. Earth. Will ro oral result ;m 's'igniiicant
�^ the p P
a: Unstable eart],i conditions or in
in ogic' substructures?
j
c'hange's get',i7
h : Disruptions , displacements ; com-
o ,rercovering of the $o-il'i--
paction ar
c + Change in'.'t 'O rapt y or Ur:ound s tr-
or removal of
ac,e relle, e, tures
top ao.'a17
..�._..
d. Destxucti6n, cove ng o inodi
or
tion 'off any una.,c�ue'�eaingic'
h�y'scal features? ---=-�-=
e. %ncxes5e in wind water eros�.on
or, offthe s�-t.e�
o soils eit�ier .oi
f ; Changes „irt deposition or ,erasion.
changes an sTta
P.•
t ;;
of beach sands, or'
tion, depostan Or erosion which
`ar
may madly the channel.: o e x�
the. bed of the Ode an or
stream ox
any, bay n let. 0 r lalte'?
g: Loss afprime a gr�.cu�tural].y 'pxa-
duct-ve soi.s outside designated
;.
urian area$ ? •-- ^—�.
�pFendx X F page
YBS
l t
MAYBE Nth
h. ]D.posu,re of people or property to
geologic hazard§ suC;h.as'earthquakes,;'
landslides; mudslides,ground; i'ai:ltire;
ar similar hazards"?
A'`i t Will the proposal result in:
a Substanti a] deter'tx:ar of
ambient cir ldcal air 'quality?
b TIiP creation of ab j ec.tionable
odors,smoke or'i'umes7
c. icant `altea:ation o: air,
moveinent, moisture orempeaure,
or' any ,change in climate, eithei:
locallY, or regional,l,y?
3'.Water: Wi the proposal resultin substantial:,, .
a Changes iii ourents or the course
ar ._clire:ction ,r
ai water ttovement'
1,. Changes " in ab°sorb>bz on ,rates ; clraingeF.
patterns, or the.�.rate�
wry
and amount of
siirace water'ruriofi?
is
c . Need for off-site surface. drainage
`'
t
im��rovements, incIudi.n:g vegetarian
temp al,�- channel,itzotion a ,aulvert"
,i';-'
ingtal.la�tion? -
d. ` A] cerati.aris to the course or f10 r
of Mood''waters?"
_.
e . ` Change a,z the', atn,ount ,of suxl ace
wate-r in any water body?
f . Bi-sclzarge xtitta sur, ace .Wates s or
,
J n any altera,tIon of sur.face
water quaff i ', i -dol tidi ng but not
i.°ted, to ' ternpei acture; dt,s hived
oxygen or tu�rb�.di ty?
It e.
r
g, at' o' t he da.rectian or
,
rate o'f flowfgoundatrs?
h,. Change in the quaitz:ty or quali;ty
ofground waters,
:ei init thraugh
direct additions or'withclrewals,
or through an.terception of an
aquifer by cuts or ex0avat3ons?
`•i�.
Appendix r page 2' of 9
'�a
o
Mi
YES'yyyy��Y' [Ary1 ry
i. Reduttion';ln the awount OE:iaater
otherwise available for public
grater supe a es?
j. Exposureof people or property
to Water related hazards suc,'h
f.00dng? as
r. Life . Will the proposal res
lStilt
n sus`tan�ia;t
Loss of vegetation or change 3n the
diversity' of
species or. ;nutnbor,
Of any species -arts plan,cluciing
trees,.,,
shrubs, grass, crops,; ,
m crdflora snot aquatic plant )?
b Reduction of the numbers of. lyA
unique;
rare or:endangered species
of p>,ants?ar
C. Introdtttion of new species o
plants into; area,
an ox in a'barr;�r
to 'the .°normal replenshmen.t of
ekisting species?
Reduction in acrea t�
culture"]. crop? g of any agri-
5. Animal Life. gill the proposal result
in substant%s:
a=' Change' in the diversity Of
or numbers of
an �,
specie,,; of,,
a1.nimals. !(birds,, land attimal s
„
,
in'ci1 uding reptiles , ' fish `and sh,,. q
- , o l l:-
'Is, )c benth3c ori at7isms; nsaax, s, or
micofauna) ?
b . Tteducta,on of the numb els °off any .
unique, rdre or .en.
'ds, ,tidies
o f anima;l s
,
c: ZntrUcluc,tioa of xew sQecie,s o`'�'
animals a.rii:o' an area.,. or result in
a b rra.er :o the jnigratior
01'
moveiment, of ailitnaI. ?
d Reductionof,exicroaCment Por or
datearioration
to eais'tisor
Wil tl'lifa lab tat?
Appendix F p t
p�'Cf,� "Fr.7 cif T
X, E MAYBE .Nth
6, Noise., Will, the, proposal._ ,result
subs;tant,aa,�, s
a, increases in noise levels?
b . Exposure of people to :severe no,se -
l.evels?
7 . L T and. Glare . Wil:1 . the Proposal
p. p
pra .uce�sxgn i.cant lEht
x�►u�
or g ar el
8. Land_ Use;„ W.a.;11 the proposal result
in
a significant:
F
a: Alteration of'the 'planned land use
of an area, or establish a trend
which will demonstrably lead to'suCh
alteration?
b : COn 91,1,dt «itii uses on s.dJoining
properties, or conflict with
establishedzec'eational, educa-
tional, religious o.r scientific'
:Tl
uses of an, area?
9 . Natural, Resr:drces, Will the propos�.l�
-
resat .in substantial
-
a. Demand for, or'increase in the rate
or, of ;any natural resource`
of uS -
b , Depletion of any nonrenewab]e
'
natural resource?
10. Risk of tl set. Does th proposal
invo, ve a; xis] t of an explosion, or
thereleas:e of haza da
P substances
(a.racludins , but not limited: to, . 'oil,
pesticides`;, ,chemicals or, ra iation)
in the event of an accident or upset
can:ditions;?
11`, Po ulatian`; Will the pzopasal
signs -xcanbly alter the 1oction;,.j I.r�
d;s tribut ion
-, density , or growfh
rate of tie human, population of an
area tix pliys ica.l.ly divide an
establ,ishod community?
` 12. Hous in .' Willi the proposal ,
sgnz :.eantlr afi:ect esting hotisjng;
sir create a demand for, addit.ona.'
Vousi;ng7 ;;
:
Appendix F
page of ; 9,
YES' MAYBE_ NO
dower .o natural
b, Commtxnica`tIons systems?
:.ewer (will trunk Line be extended,
providing capacity to serve new
development)?
e. Storni; water drainage?
17,
Human_ Heath-, ` ' Will the proposal
resultgni
a: Creation of any 'health hazard or
�f
pctential health hazard.(excludin
g
Morita! health)
b'. Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
WE
18,
Solid Waste. Will 'the proposal result
'
3n any significant impacts :associated
with solid waste disposal or litter-
Onitro,
19.
Aesthetics. 'T+Ii1l the proposal result
Tia, 'Ma,, structiciii,
of any pvbl,ic
designatezl;•oz'reco nixed scenic vista
open to the public or will the
Proposal result in the creation of an
aosthetically ofensi�re
site open to
ptiblic� view?
20
Recrea'ta.on i. Will the proposal result'
in an impact upon the guality
quar�ity, of existing public recrea-
ti on °facil ias 2 `
21
Archeolo ical/Historical.. Will the
pro.posa resu t' in en a.tration of
a„significant archeological or
his tor�;cal :sai:te strl7^hire, object
or bu11 d"3ngY
22.
Y
Mandator Fincta.n" s o'f Si
a.' Does the paject have, the ppt;ential
to degrade the.
quality of the;, r'e
envxronnen`t substantially reduce' µo...9
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
spec7.es, cause
a: fiski or w31d].ife
population to drop be].o�v ,self
,.
Append'
a.x
a
page 6 of "9
sem--- ;—
YES MA---y'�3g NO
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant;or
animal com-=
'munity,'reduce the number restrict
.or
the range of -a rare or endangered
Plant
or animal or e
examples of the' ma ' oritninate impart"ant
California a periods of
h-, or,
Y ar preh; s tory?
b. Does
to the project have the potential..
a.ehieve short term 'ienef.�ts
the detriment of toptzl�licl
long-term y
envirornmed
ental A1s.?ted
e . Does the projecthave impacts which
are individual-ly Limited,
but
cumulatively consid.er4ble? (a project
may impact on two or
more separate
resources where the impact an each
resource is
relatively small, but
tahere the effect of the
totsl of
trioseimpacts ;on. the environ
sment is
' nific
g )
an
. ,uAgbk�n
d. Does the Project have e,Wironmental
effects which Will
cause substantial
aciversP effects on human beings
either
directly or indirectly?
,
Rpendik p'�
Aa'e
�4.:f•."T*," /, ' `�
aa„i'. Ns i�h�
00�. ,sv
I.
cl
:PAIMIlk
f y
PIP
r R�: 1�_°` ° j/�4'i��k+4,:�'�,"C�� ....,� 1.- i - ��"r. y'�� ��, �J�� ,d-•'�idd,�--y,�-0''
p,. �. y„cwy; �_. � : �: a • r'r 'a 9m Y- e . «>�J( ;"�`� {`�� a)i hr,El���w� {`
A¢ j
h ,�.v i 171rat!r�l
'�Ir7y,
p • $ pLt�h AGIC171 r@;.a r �� 9IS r ttt7 Lttirj"a 1 q JFiti
O
r
n' �gi� 1 v �' r a • +iM °� � � R• � / r �F� � �Iwh�tl�g+i�'a�t�x'�4!
C'¢ y�. ^?'' '« �r•t'�,�
L.'�+�r r s • ! f`t"� ?rgr fIt! � 2? ♦ a4 �C �i.
SiN h ole�kr {t
r O ♦ n r 4 hf r t i! u�� � � +' � ��(t I vr'i'a �.
i�xtJte�tk�f;`(z'+�
I'��1�
+ �' !r .` ...��- r •a4ar p..a wN tea.» +�>�i�°�`"'� �rzg��s� d `8 ��1 ,�I, •a"y.,:
t`4
a
,jriGi+t tqy:=-- �F ...-d..a ....a-a %G I '.t�i✓"'a�-'�s�y'!� •'+�-�,y.,.+�etidof v.�.aa
I.,mF..hy00
14 p� I, ��ry'f7 rt$�a�pr 4'1 )r, 1i cl r r� sr 0 1
I 'fi}'ro3�Yi'i�e,1"iat 1. t�.V. u
�"( vrtrwMity paa � u�avmYr v idavmaaa}a av
42-4 7
A _ - O
-r., 1
� BM 186
Bm 192
,,...nw wro ««.... .w_'��. ..a r..aM..,.....r .,�4. a-. ..t ,.:.� .e��, :,�, W.nwaW w..a.. �.-.lw.,,.r,.❑❑.�, ; p �� ^�", ,r*�•, f'�
IF
..4�,J
rrra ,o. I r,
i
_ ii�1 i Ij:� � � 0.Q � i a � y � yY� r a J"y�",• ° � I r,m, �j' { Y a,
C=' -0 & 0 G xSA iF ba tl a i 4 NSR y�
p� it �� Q ^1t t r C v A r.w ,F+k4tW^w:rt,.ruvA{rl.rFwws wa-d o
I n m a f +ll rr ♦ ur�<
) 6
�
•��# r� u,A yvl ri .� I�=�n xm � z � I � 1 :�h " � O qnr b�Fl�
q y A
� ✓ r�` pCI � �i)t G. dr p+ac�r(iu�9r1 .,4-- "".n"""'4.a6=-- 1 l7a ,� nn ''ay�5
Ca t
�.Iti PF 5 r xa � �4q&pt It w. I � { •. .:` � t .! r n: r l _ I a. n�q. ggpeee y
*�; I«rd lMttif
4 rytM s q t ,+,
�,,�` ' I a F , i pllMjl� ,. , ". rx r jun Fp• - d
s.,, •. G�. .MY �.. I� I
� is:,• " i." i. .p 'r.. d e'+ h �.. Y U ��14 � f 1 tt y�J '�• ��y{
7
,r
PERSONS CONTACTED
Bob Jones
Butte County Department of Publai.d ,Wc rkS
Bob Gaiser
Butte, County Department of Advance Planning
Doug Will's"
City ;of Chico Traffic Engineer
Kay Rolls
Rolls, Anderson and R.Qlls,'Civi Engineers
Ray Johnson
Representative for Neighborhood, Church of Chico
Hood Chatham
Project .Architect
;REFERENCES
Butte County
General Plan.
Soils 'Survey
of the Chico Area, `U.S: Department of Agr' dUlture 1929.
lith Progress R port on'Trip Ende Generation Research Counts,
Caltrans,f Judy 191764 ,
Neighborhood
Church Master Plan, 1968,.
IN
i
i
V i