HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANING COMMISSION AGENDAS 12/84ANNI,NG COMMISSION SUMNiAR , BET
MW s4-11-05-01 55-24
APPLICANT' Butte County Planning CommissiQn (Harold Deal)
ADDRESS 7 County Center Dri e, Oroville, CA 95965
OWNER Various
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Ge -neral Flan Amendment from Industrial to Low
Density Residential
N PROPERTY ZONED M-1 � LOCATED At the southeast corner of husel
Road and Lincol z ,Blvd. —+
— •,. ,_ L u. , L , :.. , „d , »7.Fl F, , 7 Y� , J`t ,
•1 ,, } a
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) IDENTIFIED AS AP 6.8;70,73,7",76,77,78,79,,10.
GEN. PLAN, Industrial PROJECT CONSISTENT? CITY s '0rov:.11e
DATE APFDCATION RECEIVED
DATE REZONING PETITION SIGNATURES CHECXED �- .� 11"i CENTAGE
DATE LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPAW8D OR CHECKED;
DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTSN �S n� - PUELXSHED
DATE DISPLAY AD PREPARED ". u ..., ._ PUBLISHED
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE (S) PUBLISHED 0 C.P, G. B
BATE MAILING LIST PREPARED
DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICES 14RITTLIN - _ MAILED NUMtE.R
ENVIRO; INWTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE PILED
RETERI+tINATIp�t W,�. .�.. ,...�..�. �.-�---•---
AND DATE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTE"
ENV. IMPACT REPORT - DATE CERTIPIEi}
OTHER;
CO��1�fI`SSION ��EARINO DATES
•
n
CON1118SION ACTION
'BOARD ACTION .....
OADMNCE(S) ADOPTED
C-OWENTs �.
...........
i
B.C. Plannina Commission
PROJECT NAME .7
(Harold Deal
S CH
AP # AP 36-29-2-01, ,etc,
FILE tt 85-24
30 Day Review
Period Ends
SCH Review
Period Ends
VUT-GGING ACTIVITY
Data Action
A
,/�
y�
'..._
// y� Y
r / Y r r" L i1 ttE� %l k � ...
-
'� ....... ,�w��.+Fnaaa .:w iSY MWS ... n..�.�.�.w �. .:.', .
_ ...... _-•. .. .,.
. u . „�, a ,_.. � .... ..
...... _. .: .. .... .�..�
SreY'r�',7
14
Butte County F�'1 :Anne. ng commi. ss-i on Meal) propa%ed Negai.-imta
>asclaratian and General. Plan AMtndment from Industrials to
Loi, nensi ty Resi dant i al and fez ons -from tai-1" (Light
ndustri al ) to Ali--111H, AR-VI{--Z 1/2, AR-MIH-3, rar A -tjH- 5
(Agri. cul tUral 'Residenf i l i• obi l e Home - 1 /2, .� � or � ��a"
parcels) dor property located at the =outhoa-;,,Lcornerof
K',usr�l Road and Lincoln Blvd.. 1 Orov i t e
The Goes Mi ssi can Waived the reading of the staff -i- i ndi nq .
Gn4i rman Schrader stated that this rezone was fear the t; zrtr t side ca f
Lincoln and asked in there was any request for rezone an the east
-5ide.
Sta•F-f stated that there were no properties idenLi+iep an the Wast side,
of Lancoln in this proposal, Staff stated that the Commission's
action Was on the east side of Lincoln.
The hearing 4•ja% opened to the public.
Harold 'Deal rjarited the zoning to rjo back to tahat it tv:As tre-$ore the
Drovi ll e General. Ryan change and rezone. He dri.scussed, i.aki ng two
parcels out OF the rep atest on the sout;-teast cor-ner o� Vt.t.sel 'Road
Lincoln Blvd...I parcal l for commercial.
Staff hated that it its C-I zonint
i to the depth of 130 to the east.
Staff alsc* stated that zooin+g a- jtjcal xstei.��l. would, aact-mmoda;te: many
ty}pes a f commearci.a Lues
La-old ileal statL--d that his pCirce1 iia 14310 On the Onrtheast corner o-f
$tat+ -'reit it Would he more -AppropriaLe le, t in indut-trial.
Mr* NM4Lrey S.ubmittod sage maps to the
Cit- Deal % iwgested reg ane to 1; acre: Th.-oe parcels east
a'lrear y "onod AR "iIH-5, east ri.aid tt-to Wymanti tk.�Lvine splits
parcels.. Ha wanted to t see{ eQnsAsteait. With to 'Lin--imIn
Mr. Noi,•-eya otwn:�r of p,,mrrol 7b 8nd 76 i �;'% of the lar ,,ruler
c Q0t;i.dersdtion; revipwwl pric- Lt ai:n,y ..si:-;Pd Mr. DeLa
not Paving foes for the application.
Chair"m�'n achi's"l.dur ot':tted that thy*
r+-Y Lj"Oro. Y to Cama 3ut'lwith a
IFthen el_CenaraCc
cytyrspn there there Was rid
W*
dpFso- i ti cin,
IU t��ut�ss;��'t�
r
No-Frey rdy stated that l='j Ar ni n4 ya a long ranger plan i n
this area` He stated that k;usel Road pay cel ?r was not �azrmed by
anyonc and that parcels 75,; 1,53a 65. $2, rl, :30 and lea are legally
landlocj:ed. He stated that there ^5 aaas Z-0 ft, sirr-ip parCe
#t rC7 s ,%
Etat a road thatnxai:3 be used tk get to parcels Sl i1;
1 and 75.
Deal did not want any homes behind him. He discussed Wyrv,an Ravincir.
being 4or ft.. to 10,)0 ft, of ttnusa,ale land. Hey !4�ated that there
rias a l z�:} ftv PS and i'" easeme-nt across most of the umi;,able 1 arid. FI_'
Was against changing • he zonirig. Hai Felt that girt-iiH M
reduce the Val,_te of tha ��ti;�q �vt�uicf
property along Lanca n Blvd: tle 4;��tnteci to
KeIeP the present zoni lac of i-1 . I c the property ;as a
his proPelrt.Y parcels } r x �'t�t �tf he caa tketi
� P _I 1 I , 75 and 76, left . out.
con St-T, f�rAd that if the.
changed back i;anted access to all th-= Parc_ei:;„
Larry. Bannon, on l acre pa'r-ce's
4` to ; acr.eRs Of this z,�'o e� , t�5 Stor rIii, stated ti�at
i p ty is alt-tady' developed Comwercizil andwas Plallnilng to expand the m.ini Storage Iz�
which
Nuhlic: Wor-ks. HstaEe�a
�sad that he dre fro►;i-OPh�irbRoad ator�aa
He, ermo on
Lincoln Blvd. and tounized a4 smell bu.s%i css on the strew±'t He tsotald
l i ka,, to see Prcparty r oma n tree way It is.
Jim George regUestod zone to stay as is ort
H. DrQ'aish? eastt--rn e ct cat propa� ; i+e,jL�rl that tine lin,..? formi
-_ -i ,
the eastern boundary as dal eiV2ng that there w---js tx' t as much land
that aPP9-2r-s an the etap. He felt that. there was ;no compet ing retson
to change thearinr. He tn.atei it left; as
I'.tart %cagei-s ("tjC 't r a � ' a--"( OJ t
"w^ 1' � 14:? r_ i rt-C1 �+�` r etasa� n as S
i IL s" Pr I`kd�? ah stc`".;�e d th4' k,
lives ren cin of thy= small lots and
r e-,-4estOd that the zoning st
prrafessiasaal
rote. -� stated that, i
t wa,- fli %
OPimitn that till-
parcel .3 WOL414 hay im a higher hi arb,et value
3f
r,n-- Oere 1-ft as they are. He felt the h� � r
would be lnr"us � 3-tt r..,sr- of these ,parop,ls
t;-aa. lar �*�mcrsroi,�i. [�� kir>ntod :hem left Is z5,:
t1r. deal f ul t that orstarria or lndt;jskrial t-soG4 ti h�
future,
but he, taa:at�ad to � �� rir�tht its the
Pre erve thx : iii lr life al ?ng Wfflan Ravine. 4,
stIted that: oat all tho peop]:e ih th��
Th, he n-x�gOT
�� that It- -1d NO cztlls on this
��aing uu+ ��b�.ishL� ci ho.t rwoti to the i1r�r+ ill.c� nohere of tr7fluence
,d th f G, Wart public haari rigs.. i J'p folt `that
��afir'a :t�": ta,Frt� CJ's �r�r#ral�.ssicstw
z0nih5n' ortthe O# pviljp_- area. H-1 that that it �.OU18 ho in.,A rapt-iat�
x COrNTl�%i�NIN Gt��iI;TSI'i i`ill"LSS Doc'»7iy'i!
Chai x -man Schrader stated that whan the County got U -1e qr bvi l IV plan
they approv*d the plan as presented. Ha statod that from time to time
popple much as Mr - Deal will want it back the way it bit he felt
tho-At most Off the people wanted it lexit as it is now. pie suggoste .
i,ii thdrawi ng the .app.7 i cati onand allow ng Tine pub,l i c to oom ! in with
it i i, �idr_ta a.pPlications. Ccmmissioner behuninatLt: esti viith 'this.
Comms s3ioner~ Avis recommended leavi-,g the zoning the w .y it is, he did
not S.,ant residential.
It was moved by Cacnmissiarier gehurl' ny» secondedbyr Camtnissioner} Avis,
and unatkimously cap-ried, +Or denial ;V, 40110ti4s.
ri. r=ind that the requirements o ; CEQA 1 -ave been end
x,.
cbnaider•ed in MA i ny: t"tit dw ci pion; and
R. f=ind that the proposed prop- zt dates not corp1y gith the Butte
County General Plan pages SO and 545 and.
C' t�t;ny, the proposed-
) Gey -neral Flan Amendment Trr~om T-tet.istrial to Logit
Density Ree.A denti al and die: bne f e—not �i-j to an ARHH ` One on AP ' s
Count+ Planning Com�.mi ssi o t)
k
10 p1 i.a
FILE NO;: 85-24 and 85-20
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF FINDINGS December 6, 1984
APPLICANT;
Butte County= Planning Commission
O��NER
Various
REQUEST:
Rezone from M-1 to AR -MH, AR -MR -2 1%2,
AR41H-3 or AR41H-5 and, General Plan
Amendment from. Indtistrial to Low Density
Residential
AP NO.
36-29-2-01, 23, 24, 250 28, 29 30, 51,
66, 67, 6, 7,0, 73, 75
52, 53, 54,
76, 77, 78, 1-9, 80
SIZE:
'75+ acres
LOCATION:
At the southeast cornet, of Kusel Rd.
qnd Lincoln Bjvd. in south 'Oroville
EXISTING ZONING:
ctrl
ZONING HISTORY:
Zoned M-1 Feb. 28, 1584 Ord. 2393
Zoned A -R May 18, 1959 Ord, 545
Zoned AR -MH Feb. 1.1, 1975 Ord. .1.546
SURROUNDING ZONING
AR -MH -5, M-1
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
Ali: of residonti;, and industrial uses
GENERAL PLAN DESIONATION:
Industrial
APPLTCABLt REGULATIONS :Butte
Count - y General Plaft Land Use Element
' :
Page 54
Comments;
Public Works t "Disposal of storm dt,'linage can be d problem, in this erea�"
Department of Fores t "No impact on Fire Departtttent ."
North Burbank Public Ut ; ity, Ser tice t "Subject ptopert)` is 'not within or
e r�tice tltrotgit NEP�,iD
contiguous to aun cries o iI P
D: Sandtar� set5et
'k
i �!
not available at titin locat�.on.
ANALYS_l' S ;_
On September 25th the Planning
'one
Comrttissian initiated a rozone on, these
October 18th of t} is
properties at t11e `rettuo5t 01
the pro j eot was amended to
property, owner.
include a Oeneral Plan Amendment to Loan
year
Densit'Y Residon.tial and a range
of Ak-14tH zoning. An analysis of Land
(see
use, parcel sizes and dovel6pmeIitpotential
has been prapared.
attaGllineItt) -
,
FILE NO: 55-20 and 85-2
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COIN-WISSION
STAFF FINDINGS December 6, 1984
Land uses are primarily residential with some notable exceptions-
1. New industrial construction at the NW corner.
24 A.B.C. real estate office and. RV sales at the Stitt' corner; and
a \"ew mini storage at the Sit` coiner,
There are 21 parcels ranging in size from 1/3 to 12 acres.
Five different zoning categories were included in the growth scenario
AR-INiH, AR -M-1, Al -'411-1-2 1/2, AR -MH -3j and AR -MH -5. ACS-Ntit was immedi:1ately
excluded .fir oitt further consideration because of massive growth potential.
330 new parcels could be created, from 18 now existing an increase of
1733$. Support services required by minimum parcel developments ars
unavailable.
The initial .study was prepared: as a master, ,environmental assessment As
properties develop they will be required to comply With the attached
mitigation measuresi measuresAdministering the initial study in this fashion
will cut 6 to S weeks from the development review process.
Long term uses and trends in v,iis area should be considered prior to
app aving a General P—in Amendment; ,Eticellent rail. access led Oroville
nn,d the County to designate south Orovi,lle for industrial use. Removed
;from Oroville's major resi.dont,ial sections, land use conflicts can be
kept to a minimum.
Industry is established within pi°oj ect bourcari es businesses) and to
the west. What was, once residential, has been coverting'to industrial,
Somo period of transition is to be'expected But is a General Plan
Amendment now allowing the time necessary for a designation to take hold's
Or will o General Plan Amendment create an unsure devel.opment climate
promoting investors to red line the area? 6 out of 7 site designation
criterid are met by the existing industrial' designation (pg. 54 LUES
A low density residential designation is 'inappropriate *opri.ate dor these
reasons,
1. DiLstance to similar development (l mile+) ,
2. Lack of .services/infrasttucture t drainages wal kk ays, roadways*
3. 120 ft wide zone "All flood Boundary along Wyman Ravine,
4: Outside of Orovi.11e's urban atoail
5:, Proximity of Orov-111.e's industrial area,
An abundant supply of hand has been dosignated lot industri4i use to
'promote investing and prop tip Orovlle+s heal: economy,
*drainage �j toad improvemetith sxe required, '1Vith an iiidu8tTia.l: or commercial.
building .permit. -2
u
The County should: support this effort.
RECOMMENDATION:
r �1 Q p
in d that the xe u�sionl; �andf CEQA have been completed and con;��i.tlercci.
A. Fin
Makin this
decision;
13, Find that the proposed project does not comply with the Butte Cotinty
General Plan pages 50 and S4; arid
C Deny the proposed General Plan Amendment from Industrial to Logy
Density Residential and rezone from i�i-1 to an AR. -MH zone on AP'
56-292•-1, 23, 241 251 28-30, 51-54, 65-68, 70, 73 75.-80 (Butte
County Planning Commission)
if the Commissionfinds the prope'-ty to be suited for residential use,
)
then it would be Proper to:
Find
Makin this requirements
as Of CPQA have been completed and considered
A, Find that the rec{uiretnentnd adopt a mitigated +
and P a g_ted Negative Declaration,•
B. Plan
7Find that the P P }x Butte ro`ect complies wit' a County General,
guidelines for residential development; and
n
Ci Adopt a Resolution recommending to the Board of Supervisors to adopt
a Resolution approving a General Plan .Amdnement from Industrial to`
Agricultural_
on AP 36-29=2-01, 23-25, 28-30!,51.54,
65-68, ?0, 731 75-80 and _
D, Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinanct; approving
the rezone from MI -1 to A4114-1 011 AP 36-20-2-23 24 2S 28, 20, 56,'
52, S31 541 65, 67, 70, 73, 75, 760 774 and
E Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance approving
a rezone from M-1, to AR -M-5 for AP 36.292-51, 78, 79, (ButteCounty
Plat ning Colttmissioil
Discussion: Parcels with industrial development are not; recommended for
redesignation, parcels 3Nfithin 1Vymau Ravine f:loodmay and zoned A114 H -S
to the east; are recommended for AR -MH -S; The northwest parcel is
developing and 1,$ not recommended for a rezone.
It is recognitdd that
i
1e9`ving the Industrial designations here and to the south will create land
use conflicts and push parcels betwoen them: to apply for industrial uses
parcel sizes`:
S 2 4d
l- acres 69
2-3 acres 2 10d
3-5 acres 2 rho
5 acres* G 29°
Total 21 Parcels 1.0210-
3,
r
4
FILE NO. 8.5-20 and 85-25
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COM41SSION
STAFF FINDINGS - December 6)''1984
Growth, Scenario
AR -MH AR -MH - l
AR -MH -2,1/2
AR -MI -I - 3
,AR -MI -i- 5
2@ 1/3 3 2
2
2
2
4 2
1
1
1
5 2 1
l
1
1
@ 0 4 1
l
1
1
3 @ 1 16 3
3
3
3
@1:,3 6
11
1
@1.47 7 1
1
Z
1
01.9 10 1]
1
16 3
1
1:
@ 5 26
2
6 32 6
2
2
3' 42 S
3
2
@ 9' 48 9
3
3
1
@10' 53 10'
4
3
2
011.9 63 1.1-
4
3
2
Tota, 18 330 63
30
26
20
Increase 1133% 28000-
66%
4410
110
3 parcels now developed with industrial,/commercial uses are
eXcl.tided from
growth scenarioIt is highly unlikely that they would convert t` a
residential use.
-4_
2. Cla-rificat ion Of Commission - s action rri2ga;rdirtg, Sottth LAncoln.
(PrUPL-rtY located. eae!L Of Linr-oln Avenue -to �)yrnan
klavine and Smyth rj,F
Chairman Schrader pointed out that ,: t3ehelraj, plan
I
needs to O,=Ltr along w4th the tune change.
chamoe,
Mrs. Tuttle that the mln(Aes Of E3T---PtQmb--- I934 reflect
retldne back to AR-tlH-!5 and, the intent was to be lest open for CIR-mH
'
tbni. nq. 3
, S -t a+ f is az k'n�l for r-larixication, as, to whiA, type cif--ohing
Kirthier sald there is a ran g..' of
' AR -HH zones
m oriLginal
to c into. Mr.
roqUest Was� to go back to 1-shilt it
eras Which i5 fii;�-ilEi.
Cary mls!nioner Behunin mow --d 1--o correct the minkahes
of 8eptLzmber 2c),
1964 to reflect AR-rjH �omjng -MS'�ead .71M. ,H-,, zoming,
hF-a,rings
and that
be initiatod for the purposes of Rial,,ihLral
.7 a
gent plan
m
aendmt�!nt to the appropriate ;_ ra
.gv of --ones.
;,-ri-4-.Assi:Cjner LambLzrt and
t")O► !On Seabnded by
tut-lianimol.qa-ly carried.
BUM COTINITY PLANIN I ING COMN11581,0iN )j4jNjjjTg8c��tal�er18)
1984
r
V. MISCELLANEGUS
1'. Request +or toning review by 'Harold Deal T Lincoln wlvd. z tnd
Kusal Avenue area.
y, y tt ,jam W
- Che:t�tl"man ,C.',`�� .fir :': .' r •ex l: iced 'A o i M,-. � ;tal how the-C,-,rreni.w'.�,yii� i sem in
area came about. The map grigzna�eci wit'l the City w�F Orovi3le and
they wea--e trying to be consistent with the xndust-ial designations
that they had placed on adaai.ninQ propee tiez.
Mr. Deal indicated that t.•te ares in questions is east of Lincc3ln t❑
Wyman Ravine.
There was dzscst55ion, regarding the area to be included. in th rezone.
Commissiondirected star- to Initiate the application proceedings -For
rezone or that property east of Lincoln Ave—flue to Wyman Ravit,e dnd
south o Ku?1 from M-1 bac!-, to
rz
PLAN �i G co'��asstmN CIN[iTtS t t rtli . 20', �� -=
k •.r �,• APPIINlt.'i'X It
COUNTY OF BUTTI,
MIRONMENTAL OJECKLIST i ORM
(ta lj,e compl:etea y i,ead Agericyl 84-11=05-0]
Log !! 84-09-21-03
i3ACY;GIIOUND rola if 56-29-2-01, etc,,
I
ND Vile 85-20 85-24
1. Name of proponent
Planning Commission (Harold Deal)
Butte County
,
2 Address of propaine'tit and re'presenta�t.ive (if applicable
u
7County Centex Drive Harold Deal
_
Oroville, CA 95965 — 2176 E. Xusel Road.
- Oroville, CA 91 P65 -
3`4 project description Ceneyal Plail Amendment and Rezone
Ii. MANDATORY ETNDIyN,GS,..OF STGNirrcANC;t; , � YIiS �IA1'B13 Y.. �.�...-,8
NO
a. !tries the larL ect htivz the I)Otenti�ti tta' deg -•t de the
quality of the elivirorlment,, suiztitantialiy reclwc
the habitat of a fish or Wildlife spvc!L'S, Laatstc -a
fish ai.tril.al,'l if e population to drop below self,
sustaining 10Vel.s`, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal a;ommu:nit�y>, reduce the number or rest *ict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or anithal or
eliminate important examples of the mftjor periods
of Wifornia I;i,tory or prehistory? �. Y-1
b, does the project have+ the potential to achievaa
• short-term benefits to the detriment of long-term,
environmental goals" (A short-term impact 811 the
environment is cine which occurs in tt relatively
brief 'period of time While long-term impacts w4#.l,l
endure into 'the future.) ..... l >
a . hoes the project have impacts wh cyh are iadividua
ally° 1brfited*l but cumitlatively COnsiderablel (A'
project t may impact on two or mare septttate resources
tqhere the impact an each resource is relatively
slnall? r b Y } V
but cvltt?t'e the effect of the rata! ofth'�
Impa.cis on tho env1ronment is si mi,ricant,
i, does the project have onvi roxlmentai effects ' which
frill cause stibstantial,adverse drrec.ts on lit.tman �(
beings, either.' dirtic:tl� a * indirect! "
ilkbf)jlMTlacNN!LQ t)mpletej I,v the Dead Agency)
On the bash of this itttt zl ev,111 tt,iune,
],,WE 'find tltc� prCiposckl project C UI.,II N:OT have a significant efact
rz. the environment, and NIMIAI VI's IyECLARA'1'TO wi l.l. be prepared'
I/Ictii fiticl that although that proposod project could linve a signiri-
cant effect on the onvironment, thero 'til not lie a sihnl.i' caait
effect it, this arse becow4o the M,11'ICIATTON.lWIA'S14tM :S described of
the ;att:ttched sheet rat e lzectitt ttdalecl tai the projont. A 4180A`CI'Vl
Ctl?OIx11hA91`TON 'will -he prepared,
l;lIVE find tlit+ proposed' projOO MAY have a s'al;nil`ie';ant' etfcct on
tWe environmetat.r aitd all I:NVTRONi`II:NCAY. Ih[iAC'r' iMiiCtR'C is r
et0i' red.,
DA11 Novettlbar S.� 1984.. ticill,~JJ'Y 011 BIl`C'IT, VI1ANNI.NO UTA12UM'I
ssSat ate _p,latint'r
Iay ,
12e zr t t.'t7ts el ,
I j ENVIRONMENTAL IIKC` S
Expl,arat'Lons o 1 . yesand '!maybe'" ane*A are rewired
on attached sheets)
YES
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result s zY; ifi �;arut:
MAYBE 'NO
a:
Unstable earth conditions or in eh, ,,•lie in
geologic substructures? -
r
b,
Disruptions, displacements, Lompadtion or
ovetcoverilg of the 50 411,21
C.
Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
d,
Destruction, covey inQ or mo& ficariar, of any ."
.4
unique geologic or physical features?
eb
Increase in wind or water erasion of soils,
either.on or off -sate?
f.
Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
'
satnds , or changes in siltation, deposition
ox erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bei of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or la,l;e?
gi
boss of prime agriculturally productive soils
outside designate urban areas?
h,
E:3tpovux°e of people or property' to geologic
hazards such as earthgt,ia'ces landslides, mud,-
slides, ,ground i:ail,ure or si.mil.sr hazard,;?`
?._.
Z. ATTR Will the proposal result in substantial
a:
Aix emissions t,�r deter joratio,,i of ambient
air quality',',
b'.
The creation of objectionable odors, smoky
`""'"
or fumes?
c,
� x. � '
Alteration. of akr tnov em�.r�t omoisture or
temperantro, or any change in, climate
locally or regionally?
3. WATER. Will the ptoposal, t,esult in substaatial:
a:
Changes in currents, or the eours6 or
direction of c+za;ter movements in either
maxi.ne ' or fresh, watoxs?
'absorption
b
Changes in rates, diainage pattdxns,
or the, rate and amount of surface runoff?
c.
Need for orf -site surface drainage improve
lhent�,_ i tcluding vegetation removal,. channel-
iza.txon or culvert installation?
d,
Alterati.4ag to the course or flout of j flood
wateT +a
di
Change in the amount of surface water lin any
waster bode?
f:
nschar, ge into surface waterS, Or in any
alteration of Surface water quality, Lnclud.i'
'but
t ,t t
not, l�mxk, to temp e, dx�ssolved
,
ygenor Curb%
:
tof hetdirecti on C72j' rate of flow
nwaters
ofvO
y
ground ?
h
C}.an,ge in the quan'4ity of ground waters,
either through direct' additions jai with -
01,
d t ac�als y thro�tgla iurto,ceptaon of an,
a.q ui.fer by cuts or, excavations?
Red ctio°n in the amount of wt ttr otherwise
available
vailaJle for public A11te r s tpgl i e't l
j
Exp o.Slte of people or prcpetty to water
Y
.ng
1''e,latl;d h'4t't32`dS I Such a5 f��iC�t� ..:.,...;
,.,,
Yom'
�WB E
No
4.
PUNT' iViil the proposal resuwt in Substantial:
a� Mang in the diversity of spec,irs,
or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs;
grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b Reduction of the numbers of arty
unique-, rare,
or endangered specie.5 of plants?
C- Introduction of new )Ipecjes of plants into an, "—
area, or in a barriej� tOL the normal replenish-
ment oz e,aistinl- specjes"?
d. Reduction in acreage of an, agricultural crop"? `---"
Si
-ANIMAL LIRE. Will the proposal result in.substanti,ral;
a-hange in the diversity of species, or numbers'
of
any species of animals (birds,laid" animals
.i;�cluding reptiles, fish and shell f1sh,
organisms or insects )?
Reduction
b., Reduction in the numbers of an unique rax
or -endangered species of animals l � � c
c;. Introduction',of nesr species df animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration-
or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife:
_-
habitat?
NOISE, !"ill'the proposal result in substantial.,'
a. Increases in eYa;ting noise lej•els"?
b. Exposure
of people t0 severe noise lev�els?
LIGHT AND GLARE , lVi..l t the proposal prbduce
sig-Ifff :cant light and glare?
S
,?
LVID ME. Will the proposal result in a
su stantlal altetalton cif the ser.t
or
prplanned
1311d use of an area"
9,,
NATURAL RESOURCE* Will: the proposal result �n
substan �. xG R:
a. Increase in the xyate bf use Of any natural
b. , Depletion ,r� any non-renewable natural
Y es� V'lr4rce.5
lil ,
RIS'" OP. UPSET Will tha proposal iffy lNre,
a a
,A pis e: p losXon or the 'release of, 11avard-
Ou s substarAces (ihcitidirig but riot limited jo,
oil. pesticides,,' chemicals Or 'radaatiot ) in . the
evcnt of an Accident or upset conditions?
b, possible inter
erent:e with an emengenc
respo�lse pl�ti o;` emerenc� e"V"aCiraton plan?
"" f
it .
POPMATION, Ivill the prq',os: i alter the lo,cation.�
Ust"tit
ori, density,g, human
or �� o��th 'abate o�i' the �1
population'
1L+
Hotfslw. Will, the proposal a feect e..i.sting housing,
of c reate a dema ld, Cor AdditiolhaJ6 hog a;n
fis
MAYBE NO
13
TRANSPORTAT / I1=1.ATION. Will the proposdl
result in;
a, Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?.
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new paxking?
c.. Substantia. impact on eX .sting transport , : an
system .
_
Significant alterations to
d. Si g .present pattet•:ns
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne., rail or air traffic'?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?.
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an, effect
upon, or ,•esul.t in a need for new or• altered
p
governmental services
a. Fire protection?
b. police protection" . `
c, Schools
x
d, Parks or other recreational face lit es?
e. Maintenance o public facilities, including
. f pubs
X
roads.?
f. Other governmental services?.
i5.
ENERGY. Will the proposal result my
a« Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
�
b. Substantial increase in demand uponexisting
sources of energy, or require tho development
of new sources of energy?
"'
16�
UTILITIES, Will the propsal result in;a need fox
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
a, Power or natural, t as'
_.
b4 Communications systems?
X
G. Iva tor;
d. Sewer wr septi-. yank"?
e . storm water drainage? ,
f 8011.4 waste and disposal!
17
RUNQUI HEALTH. Will the proposal result in.
aCreat on of any health havard or, potential
health hazard (excluding mental health) ?
,
b; txposuro of people to potential health
l's+
proposal result i n the
Ams
Cructiotl ;of any' scenic vista or vxewopera to
the pu lie) or 14ill the prop�osxt1 -resul is iii the
creat!on of an aesthetically of�eri!�ive site! °onety
to public v'e't,?
YES MAYBE
140
19. RECREATIUQi Will the' proptsapre in an impact
upon the yoQ py of Yec�e,�taort,al
opportuneties
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a ii'� 7l the proposal result , in the alteration
of or the destruction of aprehi stork or
historic archaeological site?'
b'.
Will the proposal result in -advers;e physical
or, aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or,
historic building, structure or object?
C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which would affect
unique ,
ethnic cultural values,
d.
1r
r�
Will the restrict
pro oral. xes..rI. existing religious
or sacred use within the potential impact
area?
DISCUSSIONOp ENUI:R(7MIENTAL Ev,�Ltr��TQN ��p 36�z�-1 01 eta,
See attachment
i
r
_ u _
DISCUSSICIN OF'ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 36-29-2-01, etc.
General Plan Amendment and Rezone on 78.53 acres from Industrial to
Low Density Residential and one of the AR-MH zonings.
Prior, to preparing the initial study an analysis of parcel sizes, land
Use and development 1 under various zones was
P Potentia
.prepared..
It became immediately apparent that thero er+y should
to AR-MH. 'Surrounding uses, parcel sizes, hack ofnfnot be astructuretaned
p P
re Andservices, and distance to town, mato the property unsuit,lbl_e for
minimum parcel: size development.
'Therefor, y, the initial study focuses on potential impacts from AR-MH--i.
2 1/21 3 or 5 acre zoning
Environmental impacts Whicii would result from developmerit
under I the
proposed zoning Are, very' real. However, residential devel.'bpment wou"ld;
result in fewer impacts than that Possible under e7c
zoning. istng industrial
The initial study will fungi. l.ipm as a master environmental ronmental assessment.
Mitigation measures described would be implemented at the time of
development.
ib1o1+4. Development of 5D 1, ots and hr+mesi te!s will o+�"ercover and
compact an average of v 4-00 squar=e feet per, dwelling unit or 3.9 acres
total. Developing roads into interior parcels (or- widening eXisting
Ones,) will overcover an additional 1.38 ao
Will pprt�ach 5-,s acres*
r els., Total overccver2'ng
Wind and water erosion of sails is possible during` construction
phases. Soils eroded off-site will be depositod into Wyman Ravine
djacent to the east. Increased deposition of $oil and si.lf:s in
,Wyman kavine causes flooding ;down%tream in Palermo.
ih Ari infer' ed fault of thL rbbthill Shear Zane traverses this
property: An earthquake, along the fault is capablo of damaging
foundations, chimney_-5 and mobile homes.
3b c; f t i; Development will genee-ate a substantial volume of sto
, rm
water runoff, These properties drain ►4a%t into Wyman having
ollutants washbnto Wyman Ravine is limited to the rainy oeason.
y
Pis
t ischar4 s �d off of roadways 'Will be d� JUr t:!d b
Any
his time of year. y the high flaws at
t
' Zone All f 1 ood boundary along Wyman Ravine is app
f t, acrosq oncumberi np fitsi�ri al ro ; i matel y 120�i
ort the a 600 . p g Prapert'y ° s east edge:
Wells, septic ,systems and res;denoos mast maintain a i4D ftp
from the high water mark. setback
Appoitdix F Page
AP 56-21-2-01, etc.
4a; Wyman Ravine supperts a bountiful array of riparian vegotati o.n ,
The floodway setback, will 'help to minimize disrupt Ill of till habitat.
60,L)t Any development Will leincrease e*;
Complaints of eist
�;cessivP noise, have been levied aga nsti-nq noisevSierra Pacific
industries Off Custer Lane (1,0'00 feet west} . � rm s y ! is
+ " " d - ! N�.rl'C �Trp1 1/1.In b.r .moi W/
A scale is�similar to CNEL in that nox�e x irrci;�r-ds Of 65 db
requiredf noise generation eg,peeds fedez"r�l
levels and time of occurrence: s rated according to ambient
Property to the we6t and north aru r ixl�a°=er7tl,, designated tai -1 and M-21.
Over the years zoriin n-Eiite ham r
r!R-MH .(19 7 ) �
andrrjsl:. f otsertt.d, a.
i
These and nhx
Thhborin� p
'� r�rper�t= r<s have , cl�v�.�l. oF)ec� �� ,a: Mi:, Ofsidential: and industrial cases. Oroville,<�, �r�zr� inclustrxal area lies
north and ►^lhst along the r ailroad t"cks arld Highway 70.
l Ind�tst�"i al cieYk4l apMQ?flt, avvuul d gum r-,.tt e ".� ., a �srr � of ,
or .,368 total.. T-te�i.dEntr.ai a�c�r s .t€ r e ect r,, ,te �ADT/dwelling!JADT/arae
6,5
unit or 0 ATT total. i ;.
I(Usel. and Uddi e. r ozid� 44i 'i l neva ttj tae:.
wxx cir<t,t arr,.d a arat�Sed
k:usea l ,inc al n a i ddi L xra oln aper^ ajchLs may need tQ be kiirdened to
insure,.adeguate 5i,cdht dist,am_e.
14. nevel oPmerlt Will i rrpr eas de*ManO for all
There xs a moderate fire hazarts ori-sit.eM li g,+ital ydr alts
on-site water Storage xnstallin izre hydrants oP~
g . will ai rd x rw �c a r e stapr e!�sa or -c
ib. Area groundwater may bra contaminatLid. )�evelr�gacrent will regrrxre
annexation, to I�xWYS.�?. o
I�tater Act. No Septio tanksoMpliance orr wells ar-eht,� Fmjt;tedxa Safewithir► the
g
boundary, he f l0odway
17: i�,oterj'tial h altta tra ar} u b �tbc
Mit'aaYirr�aa,a. cl' ttrr= aaa t ttae use #
r4ation frt:ear4rite5,
24a: An archaeological
rrwey 'Will he r�gcrzr~hrl 'r.yr rw� Barrel as it
develops.
r l
8
Applicant:
Butte County Planning Assessor's Parcel A.
Comra'ssion (Harold Deaf 56-29 ate,
Log ## 84-09-21-03
DATA SHEi=T
A.
ftgject
Descr i gti on
1.
Type of Project; General Plan Amendtr,ent and Rezone
2.
Brief Description: General flan Amendment fvoto Industrial to
Low Density Residential, Rezone from M--1 to BAR -t` IJ.
3.,'
Location: Property south of Kusel Road, east of Lincoln
alvsi. v north of Addie Way, meet. of Wyman Ravine.
4.
Proposed Density of Development Unknown at k; )j s time
5.
Amount of Imperviouz Surfacing; UnLknown at this tune
b.
Access and Nearest Public Road(s) Lincoln, 11!Usiel and Oddie
7.
Method of Sewage Disposal Individual septic tanks
8.
Source of Water Supply: 0,W:l.Dk or individual wells
9•
Prep imity of Power Lines; To original parcels '
14.
Potential for furrthor land divisions and developments,
Development scenarios under various zonings is attached,to
initial' study.
H
'Envronrnt?ntal Settiricl
ehy,si_ral gEnvirorrments
1,.
Terrain
ac.
General `i'opogr;tphic Character: Gently undulating valley land
b.
Slopes:' 0_57.
C.
Elevation-- 240-•210 feet ASC_
d«
Limiting Faetorsw Uopressions restf iat drainage
2.
Soi'1
s
a.
-T es and Chaeacteristi.cs-'Redding gravelly loans to 28'"q ,
cemented hardpan at '?S -Ser.;", Kimball loam gravelly (along
Wyman Ravine) , low organic contoriLl retains moisture well,
b.
Limiting Factors. Pre!�once 0+ tlravols in Kimball loam, `
liquifactidn ptstential. along Wyman. Ravine. I
.
Natural Hazards of the Land
a.
Earthquake Zone. Inferred fault of Foothill Shear pone
traverses pr-operty.
b.
Erosion Potential: Moderate.
C .
Landslide Potent al M Mone
d.-
MoModeratoy
Fire Hazard-.:
e.
y
Expahtive 8bil Potential: High
Appendix P Cad
AP 36-L90X, etc:
4. Hydrology
a. Surface Waters Wyman Ravine adjacent ort the oast
b. Ground Water: Historically available
C
Drainage Characteristics: Wyman Ravine has inadequate
facilities and experiences flobding.
d. Annual Rainfall (normal) : 22-24 inches per year
e. Limiting Ractors Lack of drai-+age improvements
54 tli sual /Scenic Duality.-
64
uality 6. Acoustic Duality: Poor
7 Air Duality: Medium
Biological -Environment
8. Vegetation: Urban ornamentals around, houses, remnants of olives;
dense riparian vegetation along Wyman Ravine.
4, Wildlife H
abitat: Domestic animals and livestock
Cul tllra� Grtvronrrten� �,
10. Archaeological and Historical kesoLcrces in the aro,a; High
11. Butte County General Plan designation. lncvilstrial.
t.: Z"!isting Zoning* M--1
1 Fxist.,ng Land Use on-site. Industrial and residential
14. Surrounding Area''.
a, Land Usk. -,i; Industrial and residential
b. Zoni rig1 1.I2 and 5
c� Gen. Pla,q designs ..,: Industrial, Low Density Residential
d. Parcel Sirs: 1-3
e. Population
15. Character of site and Areab Developed w '%Pri/r"ural fringes
Ila.
Nearest Urban Area: brovi l l e y r3 1/2, tnx 1 es ti,:ir th
17
Relevant. Spheres of Influence: N. S. U. b. , 00W.1%04
18- Improvements Standards Urban Area-. Pursuant' to Ru,rl r Works
i9 Fire Protection 5ervi ce;
a. miles south, Station 463, 9 1/2' miles north,��� L
Nearest Count (State) Fire Station. Station #€
by Water Availability: Tanker truck
20. Schools in Areas Palertnb Union Elementary and Oroville Union
High : Sul�tool
p Appel :» F (h
AP 3t0.9-2-01, etc,.
Butte County Planning Commission
(Harold Deal,
hliti gati on -t ceasure5
I. No earthwork during the rainy season,
2. All roads and driveways to he gravelled or paved.
3. A geologic ;reconnailance,is required prior to any 'map to loce,.e
the fault,
4. A minimum 100 ft.. no building area shall be established along'
each side of the fault.
S. Install drainage facilities to convey, storm water runof4 to Wyman
Ravine. Off-site improvements may be required by Public Works to
insure development does not contribute to flooding iti Palermo
6. Maintain a 101` ft. setback from the high water mark of Wyman
Ravine.
7.' All new structures to obtain an indoor noise level of 45 CNEL
B� Development adjacent to an industrial use shall include a barrier
�'o limit noise and glare. The barrier ca be a "solid fence with
heavy landscaping, landscaped berm, or a large setback in
Combination with berms or landscaping.
1i Kusel and Oddie roads will have to be widened and improved
10. ICusel and oddie road approaches with Lincoln Boulevard should be
reviewed for possible widening to insure adequate sight distance.
11. Install fir` hydrants or on-site water storage prior to filing'
any final parcel maps.
12. Ahneh to O W.I.D. or continually... monitor wells to insure a sate
drinking water supply.
1S. Have an archaeological survey prepared and comply with
recommendations for pr 0s-Or'ving a'rtifaCt�'
Fred .Moss Land Inc, r Melvin 6 Georgia Sharks
MI. Ave, of the Stars 9 6313 Lincoln:91vd
�' WX*ley A. Cadenhead
Lo,i An eles CA' 90067
g `?
Oroi vlle, CA 1 95965
635,1 Lincoln. Blvd
Uc'ovi!le, CA 9596a
AP 36-27-26
AP 36-29-1-22
Ah 36-`9-2.-40
Mable R. Burgess
6130 Lincoln Blvd
Carson Pearl Conn'
22.10 Baldtivin
i LPrOtta'Lewis etal
Maxine Campbell
Orovill e, "CA '95965
.Ave.
P4lermo Ck 95968
9217 parfait Drive
Y S'Ic '
ramento CA 95326
AP 36-27-46
A^ 36-29•-1-33, 34
AP 36-29-2-41
Shirley A. Lombardi
1 346 Kipling
; Richard 6 Norma Porter
; 5463 Bader Road
William & Hedwig Dobis
Kaustan, TX 77(193,1
Sang Rosa, CA 9540.5
8429 cottonwood
j Boratana, CA 92335
AP 5629-1=66
AP 36-27-48
'Betty
AP 36-29-1-43
# AP 36-29'-2'-42
Lawrence 8 Hanunons
,6.111 Lincoln Blvd
Earnest 4 Diane Ashby
Jimmie D. Hays
Oroville, CA 95965
6270 Lincoln Blvd
36 Od1e Way
QrOyi;.le,, CA 95.96.5:
{ QiQo rxlle, CA 959.65
AP' 36-27-76
AP 6-29-1-57'
AP 36-29-2-4,3, 44:
Meyer Honey Company-
ompany
,
Delbert
Delbert: B : meyer
3340 St:'auss Ave,
Lerior�, Stevenson
6311 Custer Lane
! Edgar 8 Darlene ,Rhoads
419
E. Street
Oro.vL31le-, CA `95966
Oxoy .11e,'�,, CA 95965
B?t gSC;0. 95g17
0.P 36-29-1=04 F
AP 36--29-1.-64
AP 36-2.9'=2-48.
Joseph Patronite etal
24300 Shaker Blvd
max & Shaxyl lietker-
6271 Custer Lane -,..
Fred, 8 Deanna Sebastian
P.O,. Box 365
Shal�;� 111-Uhts 44'122,'
Qroy ,lle t ' CA 95965
Paradase, CA 95969
1
AP;..56-29-1-;Q5AP
36-29-1.-65
.
� AP 36-29:-2-49 ,.
Dennis W. Elam
Jamey H. Casive.11 etal
Clarence 6 Jessie Goodman
6231 Custer Lane
P.O. Box 2091
2621 Oliver Ave,
OroVille, CA;- 95965
O uvil.le,, C�, 95965 _
``
Oakland,. `,CA 94605 -
AP 56-29-1-06 �
AP 56"29-1-69
AP�36-Z9-2-50 59, 60
Overstreet
6230 Lincoln Blvd
Hy Eleanor Carnahan
8
6250 ;bi:1coln Blvd
Nasch Investments nestn ents Ltd,,
11015
Oroville, CA 95965
Qroyv lle, `CA 95965DOVOPy,
Paramount B;lva
CA '9;0241' `
AP 36-{29-1-07
AP 36-29-2-09
AP 36-29-2-57, 58'
Kenneth F Martha flea 1�.
William
_ � f[ed►�r.g Daba�s:
6312 Lincoln
Thurman 8 Rena n�ict;asl.n
1893 Rlarineview Drive
,Blvd
6327 ,I�iricol�i Blvd
Sa.tt. Leandro, CA 94577,
Orovi;lle, Cts 9596;;
Urns,►i ll.e., CA; 95955'
♦
AP 36-20-1-09
AP 36-29-2-34
r t
All a6-29-2-6],, 62,
St Clair 6 Martha Murdock "
NfOlvin 6 Debbie Bu'rkott
NAtt :e Cheatham
cibin Blvd
626ll Lynx
6321 Li ncoln Blvd
5690 Lower Wyandotte
/
Oroville CA 95965
Oroyille CA 95965
r
Orov ;i.]:ey CES .95965
AP 36-29-1.10AP
AP 36-�9=2-s5
5 tw29-2=098 14 50
0rov:iilleWyandotte
Kenneth cr Ruby OwitsbY
C.G. u J.>�. .Brandt
Irrigation District
P-0, Boge 124
3 Glen Circle Drive
P.01 Bo:c 229
pAlernto CA 95968
broville,, CA 0065'
Orovxll:e> CA 550.165
n r, JQ- . .- 4 -
Lau ,.s• & Martha No Frey
{S'
_
t
Nofrey inter. Vi OS TIM O.J. t'
6368 Lincoln Blvd 5 Edith Vinson
P 100 ' 6239_Lincoln,
Qrovxlle,, CA 95965 i
Blvd
arovzZleCA 9596,5
AP 36-29-2-23
_
AP 36-2g-2-73
Tommy & Paula George
2138 Kusel Road •
w
Vola George etax
6237 LincD
Qrvv lle CA 959fz5
w
Ln Blvd
Oroviile, CA 95965
AP 36-2,9-2-24
AP36-29-2-78y 79 '
Tx; Waryella Warren.
2160 Kuso1 Road
Faith l3.uman Drobxsh eta1
Far View
OraV lxe CA 959(a5,
Rancli.
Marysv 11e CPQ
AP 3.6_29"--2-2S
•
AP 36-29-2 8,
--8a �
�
&.. Evelyene Deal
Lair)- 4 Linda Bannon eta-I'
6 - F. Rogers
. s l Roach,
269 Lincoln Blvd
Qra��' 11- CA -959.x'5
vi.11e C A _
Or � 95..965..
AP 36-29--28,_
r
Jake 4 Clara S radlin
P u
� ,
2150 Kuse1. Road a
Oroville CA' 9.5965 l
�
AP 36-29-2.29 r ,
a
Jess &` Juani to )'riliinoham
i"Z144
n
Kusel Road
QT61kzlle,' CA,* 95965:
AP" 3,6-29-2-5�. 52
Ronald & Tamma.e' rIcK`Eniia
2210 Kusel Road
Qrovalle; 'CA, 9;596S
AP 36-29,2-5-54
S14 ani ey Plorance Pearce
64,t3 Lincoln
Oroyi,..x:e, 'C
AP 36-29-2-661 68
Lona Wyrloy
6267 1,:Lhcola Blvd
OroviJ,le, CA 95965
AP 36-29-2-67
Albert $ Betty «vo ey
6261 Li t0ft Ave :
Orovinal Cts 55965,
RESOLUTION NO.. 84-6
A RESOLUTION OF THE 'BUTTE COUNTY PLANN J. NG COWIISSION
RECOMMEN°UI'ING TO THE BOARD OF SUPtRVISORS THE ADOPTION
OF THE GPNTERAL PLO 41ENI UMENT FROM INDUSTRIAL TO AGRI
CULTURAL•RESIEIENTIAL, AN AMENDMENT TO TRE 'BUTTE COUNTY
LAND USE ELEii(ENT " d
WHEREAS, the Butte County Planning Comatt�:�ti�oti, initiated)
2 `through an appropriate application, an amendment to the tette
Gaunt General ral Plan Land Use Element for a c:tange from Industrial
to Agricultural Residential for that property-dentified on Exhibit
f
5' '+A attached hereto; and
O } WHEREAS, the k -op )sed General Plan Amendment has been
,Istudied and x et ier�ed by Lu-te County` Pla.minc; Commission and a
8 }public hearing held, pu ". to late, at which time all interest -ed
9 4 Pers ons. were heal d; and
10i1ri-�EkE�1S ; fi i the Butte County Planning has revioued
Mild cons � 'ered he co
11 ` L a. contents of the en�T ranm:enral reviewinitial
12`study checklist (Exhibit B) prepared on the proposed General Plan
i3 I (Amendment including significant impacts, and t`indings described
14 'within the document pursuant to the California Tanvitonmental '
Quality Act' and
16 WHEREAS) the Ett tte County Planning 4*ott missi on finds the
17 'propeised amendment (EXLhibit .4) together w1 th the other applicable
is 'elements of the Butte County General Plan COMI. tise an overall in-
19 ,;terna.11y consistent thole; and
20 D10W, THEREPORE, EE IT RESOLVV as follows"
27 1, The Cie eral Plan Amendment from "ndlis.trxal to
2:� , Agricultural-Resa.d.ential:, a true copy of Which is at ta,ched hcroto.
2S � as Exhibit A anti incorrOvated b "-reteroftce, is hotoby adopted' and
24 approved by the Butte County Planning Commission as an atttend'OlOnt
25 Ito "he Butte County General plan as amended (row time to tittio; and
62, The raeneral 'plan Amendment dose+ Abed within is herobv
F .
iii
-
,.
1
t
J ,+ jell,
c
�0 _
17Irs
r
j .yf
46
j
:y ;; _
# -
S-0
s �a
-
-73 3
r
e,,,
h
1 �•
-c
fW-Q" 6�.
'J..,,. e- '1 , +wcoun
'!
- IAN0
OF f:'ATs 1.AI WAI;tH Atf0 9EAll"►'`r"
PLANNING 000" ISSION
7.COONT'Y CENTER DRIVE -- OROVILL kµ CALIFORNIA 95965.3397
PHON4 - 534- 401
Ilarol.d Deal December- 7, 1984
2176 R. Kusel, Road,
Oroville,, Ca, 95965
Rew. General Plan Amendment and
Rezone (Planning Commission
initiated), ,File 85=24
Dear fir. Deal:
At the reg4l.ar meeting of the Butte, County T`lanning Commissloa held
December 6, 1954, the request for a General Plan Amendment from
Industrial to Low Density Residenta,al and Rezone from M4 (Ught
Industrial) to AR--MR3 AR -MU -2 1%2, AR -SIH -3, or AR-RH-5 (Agricultural
Residentail Mobile Home 2 1/2., 3 or, 5 acre parcels) on property
located at the southeast corner of Kusel Road and Lincoln Blvd.,
oroville, was denied;
A report of the decision on the Rezone rtque5t will be made, to the
Board of Supervisors on becembe'� la 1984. If you desire to appeal
this action by g y g ,
the Planning Comma.ssion you must do so in writing to
the Clerk 'of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oro
Cal,ifotnjt , pr io a to 5:00 p.m., Roft lay, Duce bet 24, 1984 the
end of the. 5 -day appeal period
Should you have anyquestions regarding this matter, please contact
this ozh cei
Sincerely')
,Ar: ,A. kirchez
Dircctor of Planning
BEs.t�'l.r
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNT`;C'C0MMISSMN
IF
TZifa
NOT Cli� FiTIiGTG
Notice is
hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commiss'lon that Public
hearings will be held on Thursday, December `6, 1934 in tll,c 'Butte County
Board of Supervisors'
Room, Administration Center, 25 Colt,ilty Center Drive,
Orovillej
Cali.Fornia, roagarding the following, items at tbo o'llm"'ing tides;
ITEMS PETEMINED TO BE
CATEGORT CAL:L "V7X_k'i°F.t'.OIi F��i� IRQt�'►IRNT L RVVIVII
7:36 pm..
Lance Van ',ant - Use Permit to allow,'` a mobile home as
temporary second &,tilling on property zoned A 5 (Agricultural
5 acre parcels) located on the west side of Vail Zrant Lane
(Grier Avenue), 120G feet south of Grubbs .Road, -Identified -is
AP 27,10-05, Palermo Area,.
7:45 p.rl.
Lewti! Wa ,le Bair - Use Permit to allow a secolid dwelling on
property toned AR -5 (Agricultural Residential . 5 acre parcels)
located on the ,soutlj side ofCircle Drive, approxirlatel;°y 500
fe,; - west of Na,ranla ,Avenue,, identified as Ate 36-22-57, Orov,il,le:
9:00' P.M.
Jerrold A. Dunwoody - Use Permit to allows a second dwelling on
property zoned AR -1/2 (Agricultural Residentlal, - 1/2 acre
parcels) locatef" approximately 1600 -fees: ec st of Glen Drive,,
1650 feet sootof Oro Dart BlVd. , zdentl f.iod as AF 65.12-66
void 67, Orovill,o.
ITV S ON kHICH A Nk Gf TI��E DECLARATION
REGARD IR FoNXIRON°i!iTi�l, IFII'i1CI HA5 BEEN ftECOAI,It:NDED
8:15 p . m' .
Scott Olry and Fred Manna General .flan Amend;i ont f';' n Agri-
cultural Residential to Low Denai.ty Residential and Rezone from
AR -1 (Agricultural. Residential. _ l acre parcels) to A�R (Ag1 i,
cultural - Residesxt a.;l) for prol)erty located on tho southeast
corner of Ali;teleost drive and ilt Tda Road, 'approx..' 1500 fti, east
of Lel 119ira.da Avenues ident,i.ried. as AP 36-06-IL25-, 135 and 1a5,
mollu particularly described as
Parcels 2, anti - as shown on that certain Parcel map 'Of re-
cord in Hap rmor 56 on haat e 100 on -file in the o:ffi.ce Of ItI10
Butte County Recorder. C ont=lining 2.45 acres, more or 1 ess,
Oroo-1.11. e ,
: 5 p lrl:
Butte CowlxItrw P1:alinin; Cailllllisslon (Iloa:l) - Oone�ral Plan Amend-
lwl "1I t 91
zro i Industrial to Loi-, Densil�'gr4
Residential a1tC� Ro�one fromIl_l
(IjgIYt Indti,strl al.) to AP- HII cutturnl: Residential. Mobilo
Home) AR -MI -2 1/2$ �`iIt- ally � y or AR -MR -5 (AgTI cult rIal %o ,.T
�ie'tltial r"IoC z1e Flotto 1/2 or 5 a re mill viums Tospectivoiy)
pvopevty located at the 5ollthcast r-01"ller Of l�ElI, I R000 and Iain -
Coln Blvd, more Partictilrtrly` de»,cr,lbod. as:
_.99Mi1MmYA91
AIYVtIiRaIiGIMVIM7lA�iftl1OJMYH1011DRO®lofi►IDY�RM�RIdI�.�f�.. _. .. :moo