The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES & AGENDAS 1/87 -- 6/87BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE SUMMARY AS OF FEBRUARY 2, 1987 February 25, 1987• 9tU0 a.m - Cohasset Road - Rezone 3.7-2 (continued open from 1/21/87) 10x30 a.m. BCBS - Code Amendment - Zoning (86-27) (Continued open from 12/17/86) BCPC - Code Amendment - Ag. Seq. 84-7 (Continued closed from 1/21/87) No time set Carriage Manor Rezone 81-8 Brown - Rezone 87-25 March 11, 1987 9tO0 a.m. Carrell - Rezone File 87-10 (Continued open from 12/17/86) Mitchell - Rezone File 87-18 (Continued open from 1/21/87) 4koril 22, 1987: 9too A.M. Thomas Steed - Rezone File 81-24 (Continized open from 1/28/87) BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 28, 1987 I, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 11. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Lambert, Walter, Peabody, and Vice Chairman Lynch Absent: Chairman Walter Also Present: Bettye Kircher, Director of Planning Bea S1aveley, Town of Paradise Shane L. Shane, Town of Paradise Leda: :Cage, TownofParadise Nick Ellena, Chico Enterprise Record Lynn Richardson, Secretary III: CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Renewal for a Temporary Second Dwelling for James E. Hoopes, AP 72-14-41 for Violet R. Hoopes and Site .Plan Review in a C-C Zone for Acme-Wiley Corporation on AP 7128-41. COMMISSIONER PEABODY WAS ABSENT AT THIS TIME. Hoopes - Temporary Second Dwelling. Staff recommended that the Commission pull the Site Plan review from the consent agenda to discuss separately: Staff stated that the occupant of the temporary mobile home for Hoopes was the same as last. year. It was moved by Commissioner Lambert, seconded by Commissioner Forbes, and carried for approval for Violet Its Hoopes as follows;, AYES: Commissioners Lambert, Forbes, and Vice Chairman Lynch NOES: No one ABSENT: Commissioner Peabody and Chairman Walter ABSTAINED: No one Motion carried. w.N i` BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 28, 1987 Page 2 Acme -Wiley Corporation - Site Plan Review in a C -C Zone. Staff provided a memo to the Commission dated 1-20-87, Staff Was concerned with the number of signs that could oc-ur in the area, COMMISSIONER PEABODY WAS PRESENT AT THIS TIME. Charles Moore, representative for the applicant, stated that the sign. was needed to change the name of Montgomery Wards to VOcUs. They also wanted it message board on the sign. He stated that it would be the only Pole sign rt; the shopping center, He stated that it was a 4 ft, sign, Commissioner. Lambert was concerned with the proposed annexation to the CItY of Chico and this not conforming with the City's standards. Mr, Moore chid not have a problem with changing the sign to comply With City regulations if' this was annexed to the City, Commissioner'Lambert discussed the new sign ordinance and the potential for 49 signs of this kind in the futi:re Commissioner Forbes fe7,t that if this was allowed for Wards other stores would request free standing signs. He was concerned with the potential fo- 49 free standing signs. Staff stated that this site plan was reviewed on its own merit as well as with the new ordinance. Staff commented that the Commission must review this plan on its own merit and have the authority to impose a!�y restrictions the Commission deems appropriate, The: hearing was closed, Vice Chairman Lynch asked if this required a building permit and staff stated only if the sign is electric. Vice Chairman 'Lynch questioned any requiremi;nt"s regarding wind resistance. He felt that it was unclear as to how the sign was located rei,ative to the setback. He suggested acondition "No patt of the sigh ft MAY encroach into the 55 . setback." Staff stated that if Condition #1 was not cleat, then this wording coup be added, d Commissioner Forbes asked 'how tail the 'si §tAted 30 feet, gn would be and 'Mr, Moore BUTTE 'COUNTY PLANNINIOMMISSIOIJ MINUTES - January 28,, 1987 Page ;3 Commissioner Peabody suggested thwy put the new Wall .mounted sign where the Wards sign is now and not add a new sign. CoWnissioner Lambert stated that there was a request to change the Wards sign before to put it -flat against the building. Staff stated that the City of Chico's regulations call for not more than 24 ft high and no flags. Mr. Moore stated that the flags were metal and a permanent part of the sign with a message board below. He stated that the sign anis message board would be elecrical and lighted and would require building permits. Vice Chairman Lynct• stated that the metal flags added six feat to the sign, making a total of 35 feet in height. Commissioner Lambert had reservations with allowing this ,ign, She was concerned with it not meeting the City's regulations and %ith the potential for 49 more signs. Commissioner Forbes felt that it would make more sense to have a Mall sign with a message board for the whole mall. He shared Commissioner Lambert's concerns. Vice Chairman Lynch stated that in the proposed zoning ordinance serious consideration will be given to agencies comments when a project is in their sphere of influence as this one is in the City of Chico's Spherei lie was concerned with the City of Chico being against this project; He suggested that the applciant get together w Chico and work out a sate plan that woith the City of, uld be agreeable with the City. It was moved by Commissioner Lambert, seconded by Commissioner Forbes, and unanimously carried for denial of the site plan for AcmeyWiley to allow a 30 ft. high pole sign located at the North Valley Plaza Malt (AP 7-241). John Oliver � proposed Ne7atiyt Declaration regarding environmental impact and Rezone from TPZ- 160 . 160 acre parcels) to TM -20 (Timber Mountaiih( 2pedoreeserve parcels) to facilitate a Boundary Line Modification, for property located on the west side of. Highway 32 across from Garland toad, identified as AP 56-21"56 (ptn)> Yorest ;Ranch. The Coinmissioft waived the reading of the staff findings: The hearing was opened to the public. No one was present to speak on this item: BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 28, 1987 Page 4 The hearing was closed. Commissioner Lambert questioned how many parcels were involved. Staff stated that this would not create any new parcels. There were two parcels involved; this, was to 'take a small part of one out of the preserve and put it with the other parcel. VieA Ohairman Lynch stated that this was a minor change to incorporate a rectangle Into the other parcel, Commissioner Lambert did not have a problem with this, but; she questioned the knoll. Vice Chairman Lynch suggested a condition for "no structure on 100 x 220 ft4 parcel being annexed to the other property." Staff stated that the Commission has not normally talked about development on rezones of this nature except for deer herd purposes and staff would caution the Commission against doing it now. It was moved,by Commissioner Forbes, seconded by Commissioner Lambert; and unanimously carried for: approval as follows' Note been nnsiderdhat tin makinghe ethis sdecision atidof CEQA erecommend pthat dd theBoard of Stpervisors adopt- a. Negative Declaration; and B. F'itid that the 'General Plan designation for Agricultural Residential.., is in proximity to an agricultural residential area and is in a transition area; and C. Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt written findings for Immediate rezoning than 1. The immediate rezoning would be in the 'public interecL tial and 2, uinmitigaL'edte rezoning Adverse effect upon the snit econtinued ntimbet-growing use or opet, pace use of other land zoned as Timber Pre'serv'e and e situat. Within 1 mile of the exterior boundary of the land upon which s .;,mediate rezoning is proposed; 3. The soils, slopes, and watershed conditions will be suitable for the uses proposed by the applicant if the immediate retorting is, approved: 4, 1ihe immediate rezoning is ;not inconsistent with the purposes r.11 subdivisim (3) of Section 3 of Article XIII of the 00" titution and of Chapters 6.7 of the Government Code in that si.gniticant merchantable timber is not located cK the r-3zotna area« r BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 28, 1957 i Page 5. D. Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance rezoning to TM -20 that property identified as a portion of AP 56-21-56 (0.5 acre portion) (J. Oliver and Crane Mills). Thomas Steed - Rezone (item determined to be Categorically Exempt from environmental review) from A -R (Agricultural Residential') to AR -MH (Agricultural Residential - Mobile Home) for property located the west side of 12th 'Street, approximately 215 feet south of Nelson Avenue; identified as AP 30-03-5-11) Thermalito. Staff stated that the mobile Would rct, have to meet RUD standards if the zoning was approved. The hearing was opened to the public. Thomas Steed stated taut he lives next door to the proPertYi lie stated ert with the mobile zoning and then the zoning that he bought the prop y was changed: 11e did not know the zoning was being changed: he stated that he has owned this property since 1.976; He understands the problem with the equipment on the property and is working remove he e-thremove the equipment, He is willing to sign a pap er that equipment. He was told that a fence around the equipment would belga but that fencing was too expensive, Vice Chairman Lynch stated that this property was in an areawide rezone and that it was impossible to notify people individually' lie stated that there was a display ad in the local newspaper. Staff stated that this was a 19814 areawide rezone from A-2 (which allowed mobiles) to A -R (which only allows mobiles made after 1.976) Was notice The hearing d pursuant to law by a display ad inasmuch as there were over 1000 property owners. Staff stated that the Cotcunision might want to hold the action on this for the applicant to have timt� to show good faith in abating the zoning violation on the property Mr. Steed stated that 'he 'had no problem with this being x,uetinued� Vice Chairman Lynch discussed the AR-M�zoln��6being 1r61larni.tedi mig He, stated that the new zone might allowpe Commissioner Lambert questioned there being V10 mobiles on the property. Mr. Steed stated that they were there f0t future use He stated that the stere not hooked'uP to anything, Hey wanted to split the property .y and 'have 6 mobile on each parcel. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -,January 28, 1987 Mtge 6 The hearing was closed. Vice Chairman Lynch asked staff if they could make a motion of intent to approve the rezone with conditions to be met by the applicant prior to this going forward to the Board of Supervisors and staff stated yes. The suggested conditions were as follows: 1. One dwelling unit per parcel except with'A use permit. 2. All heavy equipment, inoperative vehicles, traileLs, tank, etc., must be removed or stored within a building or behind a sight -obscuring fence within 90 days, S. The application will not move on to the Board of Supervisors until g reported to the Commission that conditions are Planning staff has re ort 4i When conditions are met, the Planning Commission will recommend that the Board of Supervisors pass an Ordinance rezoning AP 30w03-5-11 to AR -MH. 5. If proposed zoning ordinance amendments and revisions are adopted by the Board before the Board hears this application, new zoning, code designation and definitions will apply; Staff did not believe Condition S would be necessary, Staff requested a time frame for this hearing to be continued, The hearing was re -opened. Mr. Steed stated that 90 days or better would be acceptable, Vice Chairman Lynch stated that tAb applicant could apply for a property split at any time with or without the rezoning. He stated that the mobiles were fine on the property as long as they were not being occupied. He did not have a problem with the A$MH zone, but felt that they needed to abate the zoning violation firsE, Mr. Steed stated he was worried about the zoning. He stated that 90 days was reasonable and he would remove all the equipment he could in that.ength of time: He was a little concerned about the weather Stopg Vice Chairman Lynch statedeth t r. Steed will not be able to hook up the secon tsplit, The hearing was closed,` This heaping was continued closed to April 22, 1087 at 9':00 a.m. i BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Page 7 MINUTES January 28, 1987 it was moved by Vice Chairman Lynch, seconded by Commissioner Forbes, and unanimously carried for a motion of intent to recommend approval as follows: A. Find that this project is categorically exempt from environmental review (Class 3e); and B. Find that the proposed rezone would be compatible with existing devWJopment and proposed development in the community, conforms to thea Low Density Residential General Plan and Housing Element because the changing of the density in the area wi,".1 not be significant; and C, Recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance rezoning to AR-riH (Agricultural Residential. - Mobile Home) that property identified as AP 30.03-5-11 (Thomas Steed) after the following conditions have been met: 1. One dwelling unit per parcel except with a use permit,. 26 All heavy equipment, inoperative vehicles, trailers, tank, etc., must be removed or stored within a building or behind a sight' -obscuring fence within 90 days. 3 The application will not move on to the Board of Supervisors until. Planning staff has reported to the Commission that conditions are meta l� When conditions are met, the Planning Commission will recommend that the. Board of Supervisors pass an Ordinance rezoning AP 30-03-5-11 to AR -MH. ticE. ,hai,rman Lynch suggested that the applicant contact staff if he needs more time. He stated that the applicant should contact staff on or before April 1, 1987 and reminded the applicant that if he asks for more time he o-ould be waiving his rights to a timely hearing. BREAK 9:55 a.m. to 1.0:07 a.m. C,.smmissioner Peabody apologized for being late to the meeting ming Vallnerals, Ync. - proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impact and Use Permit to allow exploratory mining activities) underground storage of inflammables alld the use of explosives on property zoned "U" (Uncl.ass3.fied), located at the Chdrokee Mine S'ta; approximately 1 mile south of Cherokee. Road and 1 mile east of Highway 70 identified. as AP 41-06-38 etc,, Cherokee I BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 28, 1987 Page 8 The Commission waived the reading of the Staff Findings. The hearing was opened to the public. William Almas, representing Spring Valley Minerals., was present to answer questions. He stated that he had one question on a condition in the staff findings regarding access road improvement, Vice Chairman Lynch stated he would have to contact Public Works for the Specifics on this condition. Staff explained about public road approaches: - Vice Chairman Lynch asked about the number of trips Mr, Almas would estimate they would make per day. Staff asked the applicant about the amount of blasting. Mr. Almas stated that they would be blasting the entrances to existing tunnels for no longer than a month and a half. He stated that he would need to respond.in Writing to the total amount of explosives. lie also stated that there would not be many trips per day. Commissioner Peabody discussed the type o material and the amount of explosives. He dial not feel it would take that much expl6sives. Mr. Almas did not know the mathematics on the size of the charges Commissioner korbes asked how they would close up the mine when the exploration is donei sufficient old the will come in with an application there is Almas stated that if at the end of the ex gold, Y pp kation for a mining.. permit. He stated if the ,findings are negative they will maintain the mine as it is today with a caretaker. The mines are closed at present and the property is fenced. He stated that there are two fuel tanks on the property, one for gas and one for diesel, Commissioner Lambert asked if the tanks Will, be removed if the results are negative. Mr. Almas stated that they are trying to decide What by do with the tanks. He stated that they will discuss this with the Health Department, operation, e applicant agreed With the hours of Commiss.�oner Lambert asked if th Mr. Almas stated that he appreciated the 6 days instead of 5 days BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 28, 1987 Page 9 Commissioner Lambert questioned the permit already being issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) for Condition 4. Mro Almas stated that in 1983 they applied to RWQCB to discharge water into ponds and these ponds are totally enclosed He stated that they reuse the water. Vice Chairman Lynch asked if any surplus water was washed down. into Dry Creek. Mr. Almas stated that the water inot discharged into the creek, . s 1 is recycled. He. stated that they use surface water, but do not discharge into the surface water. Vice Chairman Lynch suggested that Condition 10 be worded so residents within a l mile radius be contacted at least 1 hour before blasting. Mr. Almas agreed to this addition. He stated that they were quite a distance from the neighbors, Commissioner Peabody asked if the portal faces the northwest and Mr. Almas stated yes. Commissioner Peabody stated that there were not.-, many residefttea in that direction. Commissioner Lambert save Mr. Almas a copy of the letter received ftor William and Sheila Fass. Mr. Almas stated that there will be no _- blasting at night and that this will be a limited operatic_,, limited' existing mine tunnels. Commissioner Forbes asked, if the tunnels ran beneath neighboring properties. Mr. Almas did not know, but he did not think they went under anyone else's property, He stated that this area has been mined over many; man!, years. He did not have the information with 'him on how close to the property lines the tunnels are, He felt that the mining would be good for the area. Commissioner Lambert discisssed putting a time this permit, limit of 6 to 8 months on Mr. Almas stated that 8 mouths would be acceptable, but he would li the time to start from the date they start operation, ke Commissioner Lambert felt that this would be difficult to administer, but they could put on one year from the date of approval. Mr. Almas saw no problem with this suggestion, BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 28, 1987 Page 10 Commissioner Lambevt discussed the explosives being kept in metal magazines and under double locks. She suggested putting this in the conditions Louis Camenzind, Jr., 2194 Oro -Chico Highway, Durham, was in favor of approving this permit. He felt the Commission should encourage mining in Butte County. He felt that the blasting condition should be flexible. He stated if the properties were patented mining properties, then the people would have a vested right to mine, Mr. Almas thought that portions were patented, but was not sure about the whole property. He said he would find -out Carol Foster stated that her house water comes from a spring in the area and she was concerned With the water in the spring being affected. Mr. Almas stated that the blasting was restricted to existing underground workings and blasting would be limited to the owner's property, Mrs, Foster stated she owned adjoining property and she was concerned with the blasting and her water supply, She stated that the spring is a. short dAstance from the property Line: Commissioner Lambert asked what distance for the blasting from the property line would Mrs. Foster be comfortable with? Mrs. Faster stated she would have to ask an expert, She stated that the spring is covered and piped to her house. She was concerned with the water table in the area. Commissioner Peabody was concerned with the output of the spring. He did not want Mrs. foster to suffer any damages. Mr, Almas stated that he iloW.d be happy to me:St with Mrs. Foster when they know where the blasting will take place. He is r�il�.int to work with the Fosters regarding the water. T'.e hearing was closed. Commissioner Forbes asked if other property owners were drawing water from this spring and staff stated that there was no information at this time, Vice Chairman Lynch discussed limiting the number of shots in the area, Staff did not know if this could be dome; there have been problems fat neighbors with other permits which allow blasting; BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 28: 1987 Page 11 Vice C.,airman Lynch asked what would be the most blasting charges would have in a row; Arges they Mr. Almas stated probably 16 at the most, complex issue and he needed expert advice one theaamountted aoftexp �s a' that would affect the spring. plosives Commissioner Lambert stated she would like this heatingco answer some of the questions, ntinued to Mr. Almas stated he could use the tdine to talk to his eo could also get in touch with the rosters on their concerns, and they Vice Chairman Lynch suggested continuing this hearing to Febtur:r 1987) to work out the technical questions; at 10:30 dr 1:30 that they needed a detailed plot plan of the Y 11,. b.€� stated approximately d and where the to y Property show entrances were ' P roxzmatel where olthe Property lines, tunnel. Property showing the spring location, number of P of Mrs, raster's Lace (maximum) for tunnel Forbes asked for ainformationmon how much um amount fofotheer roeeed. Commissioner Vit' Chairman Lynch requested advice fl..) County Counsel is his Opinion regarding the laws on patented lands. P p se is Patented, P n Mr. Alms agreed to continue this hearin „jurisdiction over the water and they 'have He stated that t. has given him.a permit.. Vice Chairman Lynch stated that they w J ouId like more advice from County Counsel and.. they wanted a more detailed plot plan,. Mr. Almas asked, what would happen to the project if the t y were close to he boundaries? P a Staveley Town of Paradise) asked that this be continue' morning of February lath so she could be prtent, d to the Commissioner Lambert asked what the RW CB he would furnishCOPY of the permit, them with a do R Permit covers, Mr, Alinas said Louis Camenzind felt :lie Commission needed a co regulations for Butte County: PJB of the mining Vice Chairm--t Lynch stated that staff would check with What does apply and he asked that Counsel. be present at the next meeting.,. Counsel, to see This hearing was te-opened. EMIL, A .Y BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 28, 1987 Pagct ,12 Mr. Almas asked the Commission to keep in mind the scale of this request, that it was a very small explor`tory operation. Commissioner Peabody was concerned with Mrs. Foster's water supply, Vice Chairman Lynch was concerned with being t lines. Qo dose to property The hearing was continued open to 2-11.-87 at 10:3.0 a,m; VT. CORRESPONDENCE California County Planning Commission Association setter. Commissioner Lambert stated she would like to give this Letter thought. She asked if the. APA survey should be done individually ome a Commission. Staff felt they should do it individually. as There was a brief discussion on attending the CCPCA m Rosa; staff si;ggested that the commission send one Coeetin Chairman�� $ in Santa.. mmissioner. Vice Lynch felt there should be an agenda item on responsibility i, Vice Chairman Lynch asked, if the Commission was planning on havin discussion with County Counsel on the Brown Act. Staff stated g a was on the agenda for Februar 11 Q that this �' 19 Counsel to attend; 7 and staff has asked County Commissioner Peabody welcomed Mr. Forbes and his part dipat,on t Commission, o the tit There being no further business this meeting was adjourned at 11.430 a m, BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA - January 28, 1987 (Wednesday, 9.00 a.m., 25 Cai�nFy Center Drive, Oroville) I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 11. ROLL CALL III . CONSENT A08NDA - Approval of Renewal for a Tempora-y Setond bwelling for .James E. Hoopes, AP 72-14-41 for V;iolat, R. Hoopes .and Sita Plan reviews in a C-C Zone for Acme-Wiley Corpora--ion on .AP -28-41 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.00 a.in..L hn ]liver - proposed Negative Aecla at 3.cari regarding environmental impact and ReZone from TPZ-160 (Timber Preserve F- 160 acre parcels) to TVI-20 (Timber 'Mountain 20 acre parcels) to facilitate a Boundary Linc Modifications for property located onthe welt side of Hkghway 32 across from Garland Road, identified as Ap 56-21-56 (ptn ), Forest Manch. Rxemat S4ec� - Rezone (item determined to be Categorically Tho _ p - m environmental review) from A-H (Agricultural. Residential) to AR-MH (Agricultural Residential Mobile Rome) for property lobated on the west side of 12th , 5tteet, approximately 275 feet south of Nelaon Avenue; identified as AP 30-08-5-11 Thole-mal.ito SWIih-M Valley Minerals, Inc. - proposed Ngegative bec.laration regarding environmental impact and Use.Permit to allow exploratory mining activities, underground $torago of. ibPl.ammables and the use of explo8iqog an property zoned "U" (Uncl,assiPied), located at the Cherokee Mine Site, approximately l mile south of Cherokee Road and 1 mile oast of Highway 70% identlPied as AP 41-06-88y otc c , Cherokee. V, MISCE1.LAN80U5 V I . CORRESPON'UENCC V S l . AD JOU RNMENT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 21, 1987 I; PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE iI. RO`L CALL,. Present: Commissioners Lambert, Peabody, Forbes, &-ud Second Vice Chairman Lyricf Also Present% Bettye Kircher, Director of Planning Dave.Hironimus,, Associate Planner Laura Tuttle, Associate Planner Shane L. Shane; Town of Paradise Leda Cage, Town of Paradise Nick Ellena, Chico *,nterprise Record Lynn Richardson, Secretary Bettye Kircher, Planning Director, introduced Allan Forbes to the Commission. He is the new Planning Commissioner from District III. SII, Selection of a Chairman for 1981. It was moved by Commissioner Lambert, seconded by Commissioner 'Peabody, and unanimously carried to elect Vice Chairman Walter to Planning Commission CiK .trman ; The selection of first and second vice chairman was deferred to later in the meeting. IV, CONSENT AGENDA Approval of the Minutes for December 10 and December 17, 1986, December 10, 1986• It was moved by Commissioner Lambert, seconded by Commissioner Forbes, and unanimously carried to approve the minutes of December 10, 1986 as submitted., December 17, 1986; Commissioner Lambert had a correction on Page 15, 4th paragraph from the bottom, change "a neighbor" to "neighbors" and change ''likes' to "like". It was moved by Commissioner Lamuert, seconded by Commissioner Peabody, and unanimously carried for approval of the minutes of December 17, 1986 with the above correction, BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 21, 1987 P(Age 2 California Water Service Company - proposed MitigateO ,-q.ative Declaration regarding environment&- impact and Use Pe4j4Ti). to;allow a well for public water supply,, (a public/quasi-public us-,) on property zoned SR -1 (Suburban Residential - 1 acne parcels) located on the south side of Shasta Avenue, approximately 160 feet east of Cussick Avenue, identified as AP 42-34-148, Chico, The Commission waived the reading of the Staff Findings: The hearing was opened to the public. There was nobody present for this hearing The hearing was closed, COmmissioner Lambert stated she had no problem with this request, She stated that she had received a phone call from Mr, Schoenfeld who was concerned with landscaping, The problem, of landscaping is taken care of by a condition in the staff findings. It was moved by Commissioner Forbes, seconded by Commissioner Lambert, and unanimously carried for approval as followst A, Find that the requirements of CEQA have been completed and ,considere makingthis decision and Adopt,A Mitigated Negative Declaration• , andel �n � $, Find that the projtct could have a significant effect on the environment, but will not in this case because of the adopted mitigation measurer attached; and Co Find that the proposed use of the property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies and that the use will not be unreasonably incompatible With or injurious to surrounding properties or detrimental to the health and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or to the general healthy welfare, and safety of the County,, and facilities the Use. Permit to allow a wall for a public water supply and related D: faclities as a public/quasi., ublic use on AP 4 P 42 3. 1,.48 (California eater Service Company) subject to the following conditions; Provide landscaping in the area around the diving condition, pump Muse and maintain in a 2, Provide sound attenuation by means of landscaping or in the pump hots,, cOPstruction that will reduce noise levels to 65 dB LDN at the propejety lities and 45 dB LbN interior levels In adjacent homes, BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 21p 1987 Page 3 3. Construct curb, :gutter, sidewalk and necessary road widening along Shasta. Avenue frontage. 4. Construct necessary storm drainage improvements. 5. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. Pleasant Valley Ready Mix - proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impact and Use Permit to allow a 10,000 gallon above ground fuel storage tank on property zoned M-1 (Light Industrial), .and 0-2 (General Commercial), located between the Esplanade and Highway 99, just north of Nord Highway, identified as AP 6-40-54 Chico. The Commission waived the reading of the Staff Findings; The hearing was opened to the public. There was nobody present for this hearing. Vice Chairman Lynch stated he visited the site and talked to the owners. He statPa that the owners planned on attending the meeting. Re. wanted to defer this ,ring to just before the morning break. The hL .ing was deferred to later in tha meeting. Robert Peachor - proposed Mitigated.Negatiye Declaration regarding environmental impact and Use Permit to allow a change in pre"existing nonconforming use, from an agi processing building to storage and repair of contractors equipment and storage of inflammables in a tanker truck on property zoned 8R-1 (Suburban Residential i- l acre parcels) locates; at the northwest corner of Butte Avenue and Miller Avenue, identified as AE 39-31-28, Chico: The Commission waived the reading of the 'Staff Findings. The hearing was opened to the public. Gommissiotier Lambert submitted a petition in opposition and a letter signed by Jack Milton Coon and Mary Ellen Rivera in oppositi6n. Bob Peaches, Dayton Road, stated that he wanted to 11se the property to store and repair construction equipment. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 21, 1987 pf4ge 4 Vice Chairman Lynch'asked how frequently the equipment will be moved on and off' the property. Bob Peacher stated that this will not happen often. He stated that the equipment will be there in the winter for repairs and on construction sites in the summer. He stated that they do grading and paving work and a lot of ag. work. Commissioner Forbes asked what type of equipment Mr. Peacher had it `his business: Mn Peacher stated 4 dozers,_4 carryalls,_ general construction equipment. He stated that their type of work varies. He discussed the proposed changes to the buildings on the property. Commissioner Lambert submitted pictures of the equipment, Dir. Peacher felt that thy: Public Works condition was unclear regarding the repair of the road; He did not know what they wanted. Vice Chairman Lynch stated that he should discuss this with Public Works: Commissioner Lambert asked if the caretaketIs residence was going to be a mobile home? Mt. Peacher was not sure at this time.. He stated that it will probably be a mobile, Staff asked the applicant to respond to the last paragraph of Page 2 of the Staff Finding regarding establishing the oxisting nonconforming use. Vice Chairman Lynch stated that the applicant will have to provide a legal affidavit of nonconforming use being there for the last 17 months« Commissioner Forbes questioned the tanker truck and fuel storage. Mr. Peacher stated that the tanker truck was specially made to maintain equipment. He stated that it carries 1.100 gallons of Diesel fuel and 1.00 gall'on's of gasolinei He stated the tank is inspected yearly and he has a hazardous material license. He stated that there is no other storage of inflammables on the property: Bob Browning, agent on the land, asked if a letter from Mr« Goon stating the use. of the property from .1067 to 1986 for housing equipment would be sufficient. Vice Chairman Lynch stated that they would need the :letter notarized. Mr. Browning felt that the project would upgrade the property. BUTTE. COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 21, 1987 Page 5 Charles Clark stated that if the use permit is denied,, the ow the existing nonconforming use, owner will continue Commissioner Lambert stated that this was in the neighborhood g od where she lives. Vice Chairman Lynch stated that there was also a l Opposition to this, etter from Mr. Ander ....son. in The hearing was closed. Commissioner Lambert pointed out that this is an identified nitrates and PCEs and s he felt neighbors feeling the way that the dols was a sensitive situation area of concern with family against family member. situation wit:i the Y Y , With neighbor against neighbor and this was a Compatible use for the neighborhood, ated that the neighbors did did not feel this use not feel that was in keeping She. stated that the neighbors neighbors do not object to the ag, uselacross tthe SR --1 sf—reet of the area; on the agricultural side of the Greenline reet which is zoned Ah10 and Commissioner Forbes was Opposed the zone. lie also objectetothe use Ofthe ethe troad ean d thein they should hold to the SR -1 z $ in compliance With �.onng a noise, He :felt that. Comm3. issioner Peabody store his e ui s ympathized with Mr. Peacher as to where he is going to Q pment, but felt that this was a poor use in this area feel, that this was how the area should develop, He did not CommissionerLambertstated that there. are other co that have this type of storage on them. She did not fee, zoned compatible with SR -1 zoning, but was a co Properties commercial be located in such a zone, 1 that this use was She felt storage ctreating of seeds had ceased rial Ule and should 1967 as Mr. Coon had stated, and the storage of e ui personal familyequipment, quipment, not commercial. q Pmtllt that had occurred was Vitt Chairman Lynch asked what shop facilities were in existence, In existence and have been. Mr, Clark stated that he was helping With the sale of been oil -site, He 'stated that he has seen e the property but had not quipfient inside the warehouse, for repair stated that there would be for repair of equipment inside the warehoUst, welding, cutting torches, forklift -q, etc., It was moved by Commis: io er Lambert, seconded by Commiss3.oner Forbes, and unanimously carried for denial as follows; A: Find that the requirements of 09QA have been com lee p t d and considered; aid BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION' MINUTES - January 21, 1987 'age 6 B. Find that the proposed project does not meet the requirements of Butte County Code Section 24-37 and Section 24-43 because it is not compatible in an SR -1 zone and is not a continuous nonconforming use) and :he use may impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the ]and lies, and the use may be unreasonably incompatible with or injurious to surrounding properties and detrimental to the health and general welfare of the :persons g g 1 g_ d residing or working in the nei hborhood• an C. Deny the proposed Use Permit to allow heavy equipment storage and repair, cont'ractor's office, storage of 2000 gallons of diesal and 100 ;gallons of gasoline, and a single-family residence on that property identified as AP 39-31-28 (Robert Peacher) Pleasant Valley Ready. Mix - Continued from earlier in the 'meeting. The hearing was opened to the public. Steve Hughes was there to answer questions. He felt that the above ground tank was more appropriate. He stated that he had no protests from the neighbors. He said that he had spoken with Cpl', Mr. Tiller, and Mr. Tiller told him he would recommend underground storage ..auks with the exception of agricultural use. Mr. Hughes requested approval of this use permit. Commissioner Lambert questioned the dike and sump for spillovers going into the ground._ Mr. Hughes stated that the 8t.41p pumps would be used to pick up fuel out of contaminated areas and put the fuel into another tank. Commissioner Peabody discussed the slab for the tank Mr. Hughes stated that it wouldbe a concrete slab and berm. The hearing was closed. Commissioner Lambert asked if the conditions of the original use permit had been met and staff did not have a problem, She questioned the Use Permit being granted in 1971 and the M being for 197$. Vice Chairman Lynch questioned the lack'of comments ijtom the school district-. Staff stated that the school district was not asked to commend Commissioner Vorbes asked if Pleasant Valley had any other property in the area that could be used lot storage and Mr. Hughes stated no, Staff stated that t e:rd was no notice of any violation of the old 1971 use permit. BUTTE COUNTY PLAONG COMMISSION MINUTES January 21, 1981 - 'Ppge 7 Commissioner Forbes said he would have been more comfortable with comments from the school district, Vice Chairman Lynch felt that when staff refers to a public agency in the staff findings that they should make sure, in the future, that the public agency is aware of the project. Vice Chairman Lynch did not feel the school district would object to this project, but did feel they should be aware of the project going, in. Commissioner Forbes was concerned with plans in the future to expand tho school. Vice Chairman Lynch stated that Pleasant Valley owns the land between them and the school. Commissioner Lambert stated that her major concern was because of the CDP objections to the above -ground tank. Staff stated that this was a blanket comment from GDF Commissioner Peabody discussed the risks of having the tank underground. Vice Chairman Lynch re -opened the hearingi Virat was aabig enough ssed his blemeineChicoewith with thenks nitratesgtaund,i He. without addingttohthethere was big g p problem by putting tanks underground. He felt that there was more access and control of the tank if it was left above ground. The hearing was closed. Vice Chairman Lynch suggested 4 conditions to added if this project is approved as follows: 1. Eliminate existing 500 gallon tank in northwest corner and relocate the present 1000, gallon above -ground tank with a minimum of 100 feat between any building, the 10,000 -gallon diesel storage tank; and the highway right-of-way. 2. Removal of tank will require a berm for gasoline tank as well as new diesel storage tank that will be compatible with Environmental health requlations= 3. Install minimum of 2000 gallons of Mater with high pressure pump, fire hose hookup, appropriate nozzle, and sufficient hose to reach both tanks: 4. Have a separation of electrical circuits, so that the pump for the diesel storage tank and the gasoline tank will be on a separate circuit from the pump forthe washout pond Commissioner Forbes wanted to notify the school district that this was being done. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 21, 1987 Page 8 It was moved by Commissioner Lambert, soconded by Commissioner Peabody, an(. unanimously carried for approval as follows: A. Fiad that the requirements of CEQA have been completed, and considered and adopt a Negative Declaration; and B. Find that installation of a 10)000 gallon above -ground diesel storage tank complies with Butte County Code Section 24-43 because of the additional conditions that have mitigated the hazards acknowledging the concerns of CDF and recognizing the Health comments for above -ground tanks for public safety, specifically that the proposed use of the property will not impair. the integrity and �,�haracter of the M-1 and C-2 zoning districts in which the land lies and the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with or injurious to surrounding properties or detrimental to the health and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or to the g y of the County; and general health, welfare and safety C, Approve the Use Permit to allow an above -ground installation of a 10,`000 gallon diesel fuel tank on AP 6-40-54 (Plaeasant Valley Ready Mix) subject to the following conditions: 1, Comply wtih the 1982 Uniform Fire Code as administered by the Butte County Fire Department. 2. Obtain an authority to construct from the Air Pollution Control. District prior to installation of the tank. 3: Comply with Use Permit approved May 6, 1971: 4, Eliminate existing 500 gallon tank in northwest corner and relocate the present 1000 gallon above ground tank with a,minimum of 100 feet between any building, the 10,000 -gallon diesel storage tank and the highway right-of-way, 5. Removal of tank and construction of berm for gasoline tank at well as new diesel storage 'tank that must meet with Enviromantal, Health requl :tions, 6, Install minimum of 2000 gallons of water with W.gh pressure pump, fire hose hookup, appropriate nozzle, and sufficient hose to reach 'both tanks 7. Have a separation of electrical circuits so that the pump for the ribbed storage tank and the gasolina tank will be on a separate circuit from the pump for the washout pond. 8,s Applicant wast also comply wil . all of -her applicable State and local statutes, orainances; and t. 'atiuns-, BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 21, 19$7 Page 9 Commissioner Peabody asked about the response 'time for comments. Staff stated that the request for comments gives the agency 14 days to respond. Staff stated that they will call and send a letter to the school district on this project. and asphalt cement concrete, a difference b,,v.ween Portland cement concrete Commissioner Peabody discussed th Butte. County Planning Commission - proposed Native Declaration regarding environmental impact and Rezone to coni'orm to the General Plan from U (Unclassified) and TM -40 {Timber, Mountain - A0 acre an parcels) to 8R-1 (Suburban Residential - 1 acre prtrcels), SR -5 (Suburban Residential - 5 acre parcels), FR -40 (Foothill Recreational - 40 acre parcels), :A-5 Agricultural - 5 acre parcels) located on. both sides of Cohasset Road and Keefer Road from approximately 1/2 mile west to 2 1/2 miles east of the Cohasset Road, Keefer Road intersection, north of Chico. (file, 87 2) The Commission waived the reading of the Staif Findings, Staff stated that there are 5 parcels of 160 acres in the Williamson Act: Staff' stated they have a letter :from Mr. Johnsonwhois requesting FR -40 and a letter from Mr, Douglas requesting FR -40. Staff stated that based on the General Plan and character of the area, 40 acre zoning could be considered. Where was cortespondence received from Mr. Manthei requesting ] or 3 acre parcels, Staff stated that as of February 6, 1987 the U zone will require rezoning to a specific zone for any splits under 20 acres, The hearing was opened to the public, - Jay Garner, owner of property on Cohasset Road, south of Cohasset Road, has 23 acres that he wants to develop and he was requesting Y acre zoning, Commissioner Lambert commented on the Health Departmer►t's comments, She discussed the ridge top not being able to support small parcels. She stated that the ridge top was zoned FR -40 now, Jay Garner felt his 23 acres would support 5 acre parcels, but would like to go for 1 acre parcels. Staff discussed the flood conditions in the area, John Manthei, R-1 Box 1060, Louisville, Ga 30434, stated that he owns the old sawmill property; He stated that the existing use of the property is Light manufacturing. He was requesting industrial zoning. Re stated that the sawmill has been theta since 1970. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 21, 1987 Nge 10 Staff stated that the sawmill is no longer in operation, that the sawmill dead issue. Staff stated that the manufacturing is a continue, that the lessee had made theapplication as a nonconforming use and can effective, before the U zone became Mr. Manthei asked if the manufacturing ,could continue with a than e in Vice Chairman Lynch stated it could because it is an existing noncon g zoning: Staff stated that it would take a General Plan amendment form;ih$ use. g t compatible to change this Lo an Industrial zone or something no p With the A designation. gri<<,ultural Residential Viae Chairman Lynch discussed the regulations of nonconforming uses. Mi. Manthei requested SR -1 and SR -3 toning.sawmill He wanted SR -1 coning for the sawmill site. He had 7.22 acres he was requesting be rezoned to SR -3. BREAK - 10:40 a.m; to 10:55 a.m COMMISSIONER PEABODY WAS ABSENT AT THIS TIME Charles Adam, 38 Arroyo Way, Chico, stated he had 14 acres t- Of Manthei's property, He said it was ptoposEd for SR -5 and he was north and west the minimum be reduced to 1 or 3 acre parcels. fo stated that the soil support 3 acre parcels: will COMMISSIONER.PEABODY WAS PRESENT AT THIS TIME; Mr. Adam asked for SR -1, the same zoning that is to the east SR -3 instead of 89-5 of his property., or discussed Edwards, 888 Keefer Road§ Chico, stated he had a 5 ac'. He this area were incompatible le the �With il sthe landin the area. He felt that onecacra parcels i Problem in the area. He stated that there is a Septic n He would like the Commission to the so, and he wanted larger minimums than l acre. tie felt Cha. onsider the conc'iition of parcels in the area the more benefit, t the larger the Mr. Savko stated that he has a lease With an option to k�u p p Y Pr6perty an Keefer Road. He stated that he was issued 2 ermts uridei' the A..z and 'the Caere He was in granted. He laps to make this a y prise business on the property, stated that ahe was try�ng torCre nimums� He was against the S -R tonin private enter zoning removed mess in the area and he wanted the. SLR ate a bus r , MIKE, I BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIOIQ MINUTES January 21, 1987 •l�sBe 11 `.ice Chairman Lynch stated that to go to a commercial zoning they VOUl.d ha apply for a General Plan amendment. ve to Mr, SavLo stated ':hat if the S -R is left on the I or 3 acre minit,, He stated that he wanted toproperty then they t•hould have a ..put in offices in the future. Vice Chairman Lynch advised Mr. Savko that if he wanted. Light Indus•tkial li Would have to apply for a General Plan amendment, e 14r. Savko stated that this was what he wanted. Staff stated that if the Commission initiates action fora General Plan. Amendment this.. will have to go back through the enV'�,rortmental review rsr,-cess. Staff stated that it Mr. Savko applies f, -or a General Plaft Amendment and development agreement and if it was it applicant to develop in a specific periodv� ,:imeould c, rtttnit the County and the Pete Brownson, Rock Creek Road:;, felt he was Chairman Lynch told him he was not. 'ause of this rezone, Vice P. G. Sharrow, Engineer, stated that some of the area will. not support septics on 40 acre parcels, some will supportp ics them on l acres. He stated that 1, we.s there to help and answer questions, Commissioner Lambert stated that Mr, Savko should consider a General Pl... Amendment n Vice Chairman Lynch explained tha; q p the area was zoned A-2, and that the County was required Commission herestriastions and went to the U zone, then the to., --d zone, He suggested this hearing be cantinuede the no en anrlosu�f a more specific submit his a licatf f p Pp or a General Plan and Rezone and heecould�ithen ri abeo deleted from this hearing; baVe anthei, 8cut Jackson Road Sacramento, submitted a snap of his request, y q He doing work to see whit the propertywill (8 - doing Acres)- cr es)le He stated thatsubmesajae e his own later, 1. about a month or two, He stated that he was going t.! zote request Residential. David Dewey, 3145 Keefer Road, Chico, felt Rock Greek was an a boundary for the urban area of Chico, appropriate Creek be kept as a boundary, with larger stated that he would like to seo hock on the south side, He felt that general. owners sinnthe 1earea tdosnot knowide and ab' the p,oposed Light Industrial. site; This hearin tut there was such an intended use. He felt. that g lot, gave no indicatiop. that know about the Ligh, Industrial: Dark beingthe , Al' property 6Vners slti,attld planned BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 21, 1987 Page 12 VXICe Chairman Lynch explf,ined that Light Industrial is n became a Possibility as a result of the of in the notice, this is no proposal before the Commission for any hearing. the Commission is root the Commission d tttl stated that there y Light Industrial ion .rit�l zone. He stated a suggestion to the land owner that he mightapplzone, they are only making and Light Industrial zoning. PP1y for a Oc�nera]. Plan. amendment Mr. Dewey felt that Light Industrial zoning this far ou inappropriate. lie stated that it is surrounded b tin the County was Slowly becoming urban. Y cattle On 1ll sides and is Vice Chairman Lynch stated that if the Light Industri a Public hearings a]: the land owners will be notified, is Proposed and there is, andDewey was in favor of A-40 and A-160 zoning, He stakiwis'. ted that he has cattle This hearing was continued open to February 25, 1987 at Frost and Lusk En sneers proposed Ne ative Declaration A environmental impapt and Rezone prom FR-�0 acre parcels) and RT -1/2 ° ` regarding (Foothill Residential - 4 acre ( (imum e Density Residential Mobile Home, 1/'2 Parcels) to .1tT-1 (minimum Density,+ Residential Mobile frame) and 40 (Foothill Recreational - ,� located south of South lark Drive and west -40 cof Atliens8) for '' FR -1 as AP 51-03-41. � property as AP 51 ,'west of Paradise. Of 87Of Y, identified ) (Continued open from Staff stated what Bea Stave,,,4y; Town of Paradise, had r continued. equested this hearing be Staff stated that one of the issues raised at the 'Nas why the necessity to rezone if the subdivision previous hearing existing zoning, Bea Staveley wanted a. PrOPosed would fit the town engineer, ,and Commissioner Peabody meeting to occur between herself, the y regarding traffic impacts, Commissioner Peabody stated that he went to the Town Hal new Planning Director and he was 1 and talked with the there has not yet been a meeting: Of'thetoeSet up the meeting. stated that he visited the Paradise he Owners e stated that superintendEnt, and talked to Property he f Associatianential. $e Coordinating Council. He statedO'that fthe intenrom the tpwas er Rangor►Doinronmentalhool because the whole area has to be addressed, He ,tamed that the ridge has a direct impact, on Paradise: g e committee t the development of The hearing was opened, to the public, Shane t;. Shane, Town of Paradises stated that they have some b"tths that are not getting 4ny better. He felt that it r' of study, ma,�or traffic, equines a gtu,,t deal BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 21, 1987 9 Page 13 Staff stated that they would hope that the Commission, on this application, would not base all of their conclusions on just the traffic impacts. Staff felt that the traffic was a regional problem, more so that: a site specific problem and is something that the applicant can not address. Commissioner Lambert stated that there were other concerns, schools, etc. Sile did not feel that the only concern was traffic, Staff stated that the minutes of the last meeting discuss the impacts on schools, school fees, the need for smaller zoning, the fact that the applicant had had a previous map approved and the tentative a-- oval expired. Commissioner. Peabody asked that this be continued .o Febri.tary 11, 1987, He stated that there were concerns regarding police protection ;Iso impacts on the roads and schools. Vice Chairman Lynch discussed the problems with continuing this item agai�,t, He stated that this has already been continued for one month. He asked the applicant if it was acceptable to continue this to February ll, 1987. Jack Frost, representing the ;property owner; felt they were being unfairly penalized for an area wide problem: He wan,.ed to go forward with this hearing, He just wanted to continue with what was stated on the property. He stated that this proj;let would have a very small effect on the problem, He said he would sign a paper agreeing to participate in the solution to the traffic problem when the time comes. He stated that he would prefer to have this heaving settled today, Vice Chairman tynch asked If he would agree to one week's continuance ,a.d Mn Frost stated of would, but not longer, Lee Cage, Town of Paradise, stated that a, week may not be enough time because of the Brown Act regulations regarding the agenda. Dan Kennedy stated they had reviewed their map and request for rezoning and if they do not get the request for rezone they will lose apPtoximatel. 3 lots in the development, but they will still be able to develop approximately 55 lots on this laird with the present zoning, Commissioner Forbes q+testioned staff on a possible conflict in the December 5th memo. He stated that i'n the first paragraph it indicates that there i no problem as far as the schools are concerned, fees will be assessed at the. appropriate time. He skated that the second paragraph; first sentence) "While this project does add a significant number of lots in the immediate vicinity,) the actual increase in lots allowed by the rezone over that previously allowed by the existing zoning is insignificant," is contradictory, Staff stated Uat the existing zoning provides for the minimum parcel site of 1/� acre, The proposed zoning) whidh woulA expand a portion of this to AT, would allow the applicant to come down to t lesser minimum parcel site and Mould only 611014 a small amount of additional dwellings to occur because of the standing approved. map, Staf'i stated that traffic is a consideration and tV,V'TE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Wage 14 MINUTES - January 21, 1987 everything that happens on the Upper Ridge is a traffic consideration. Staff stated that the cumulative impact has not been addressed. Staff also stated that they did not believe that it was appropriate to ask one single applicant to address the cumulative impact. Vice Chairman Lynch stated that they have a reluctant agreement on the part of the applicant to continue for one week, and the commissioner from Paradise does not feel this is sufficient time. He asked if the Commission wanted to nct on this today or continue the hearing; Commissioner Peabody wac concerned with the vacant lots in the Paradise Pines area. He did not want to create more problems with traffic. He indicated that at the time of the original development there were 5500 lots of_which ,there are 1300 vacant today. Staff stated that: the original tentative approval was in the A-2 Zone. This required zoning after the fart, as one of the conditions of approval was to apply for and diligently pursue appropriate zoning. Some of the parcels that had been tentatively approved were less than 1/2 acre minimum. Staff discussed the potential ror more than 9 additional parcel-, with the smaller acreage requirement Vice Chairman Lynch asked, if the Commission does not approve this application, what is their status with the fair share of traffic controls, etc? Staff stand that the applicant still has tyle opportunity to subdivide into the 112 acre minimums. The requirement for subdivision time and for the pro rata share would cosi,..- on the map Mr. Frost had a copy of the tentative map filed with Planning. He stated he was willing to have a recorded restriction to not allow future division of parcels. He discussed the traffic analysis on Pages 2 and 3 of the 12-11-86 staff findings. The hearing was closed, It was moved by Commissioner Peabody, and seconded by Commissioner Lambert to continue this hearing to February 11„ 1087; Commissioner Vorbes questioned Mr. Frost being against the continuance. Fro$t was not in favor of ato contolve inuance,, but tic phe stated that he would like to Mx . .,, be a part of the committee Commissioner Lambert stated that there were other impacts to tt)Asider besides traffic. She discussed the impacts to schools She stated that sham could not make tht: findings to approve this rezone because there were impacts that they could not mitigate BUTTE COUNTY 'PUNNING COMMISSION Pagc 15 MINUTES - January 21, 1987 ossibilit of some of the existing lots that V?.ce Chairman Lynch discussed the p y are not guilt on being split in the future and increasing the density. Commissioner Lam'Crt had no objections to a continuance, but would be in favor of a denial at ,nis point, AYES; Commissioners Peabody and Lambert NOES, commissioner 'orbes and Vice Chairman Lynch The previous motion was deemed a denial due.e to a tie votO ioner Forbes to continue this hearing to January 28, I{: was moved by Commiss 1987. This motion died for lack of a second.. odS seconded by Commssione' Lambert, and it was moved by Commissioner Peab carried for denial as follows s A. Note that the requirements of CEQA have been completed and considered in a malting this decision; and Find that the project does not conform to the policies of the Butte County B. General plan because there is acarpalu�nc°eC�-o�nd ow, the existingazoning wouldrea is i allow and not taken care of by the to g to within 3 ,parcels of the proposed rezone; and C, Deny the proposed rezoning to RT-'1, FR-I, and F-40 for that pl'operty identified as Ap 51-03-41 (Frost and. Lusk Engineers) rman Lynch AYES; Commissioners Peabody, Lambert, and Vice Chai NOES% Commissioner Forbes ABSENT: Chairman Walter. ABSTAINED No one Motion carried ��bioNapier - proposed 'tAtiated Negative Declaration egironmeijtal.al impact and( Rezone from the s(Foothiouth"sill ecreation 5 acre patcels) for property l.ot!ate d on f Wmftri Road at the intersection of P(101e'tOSa Way) identified as Ax mI-C6-49 (ptn) Feather 'Falls area. (File ) 12%17/86), BUTTE COUNTY PLA144ONG COMMISSION Pae 16 MINUTES January 21, 1,987 g Staff stated that they have talked to the applicants regarding the mitigation measures. Staff stated that there was a letter received agreeing to the mitigation measures and conditions of 1.2/22/86. Commissioner PeaboAy asked about the 12,000 gallon stora6e tanks. Mr. Mooney stated that there was a water tender tank in the area The hearing was closed. It 1.as moved by Vice Chairman Lynch, seconded by Commissioner Peabody, and unanimously carried to recommend approval as follows' A_. Find that t1te requirements of CEQA have been completed and recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt a mitigated negative declarations and B. Find that the project substantially confotms to the General Plan; and C. Recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance rezoning to FR -5 and FR -40 that property identified as AP 71=06-40; and D. Recoimnend that the Board of Supervisors adopt a Resolution approving the agreement (Roy and Carol Napier) with the following mitigation measures and conditions: roof of adequate 1, Provide ate water P q t �jrxor to any development, subdivision or parcel, creation activi Y 2 Amend the rezone appli^ation to include FR -40 on the remainder parcel,, 3. H.omesites are to be located within 75 feet of ttte respective access roads, A. q ra g oor erosion control. mechanisms on all new goad Require grass seeds oL perennials vell suited to decomposed g:anite at the project elevation, These seeds may need to be installed in a mialch or seeding blatket, 5 All development of structures and homesites will be restricted to sl�)pes of 0 to 15%; 6, The subsequent map shall designate nu-develOPM0nt areas around the three recorded archaeological sites. Said areas shall be sufficient: to pkotect the resources from encroachment. 7. dote on any land division map and record in the deeds the limitation on an) eXisting and future owne,:s to oppose the formation of a county service ares or a road maintenance district f0 purposes of upgrading andror alignlnb Lumpkih Road. h BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION page 17 MINUTES - January 21, 1987 8. Apply water for dust control during "road and_homesite development. 9. Limit all grading to the, dry season, herein defined as May through October. 1.0. provide drainage along both access roads, private driveways and all crossings of drainage ditches and Zitural swales. 11. Utilize contour grading. 12. Native vegetation will be retained outside of homesite areas to preserve wildlife habitat and fninimize erosion and sedimentation, 13. Limit cut and fill to 4 ft. excepting cover where needed over culverts. 14. Wherever road ditch grades exceed 6%Stdcrossitchesculvertshallborldrainageaswale. shall extend downstream to the neare Where the slope exceeds 6% and there is zero water in the ditch, begin lining 300 feet downstream from top of slope. 15. Develop an alterrative access for Parcel 6 which dares not include a driveway along Lumpkin Road: 16. Install a 10,000 -gallon water storage tankrovedidrafting,co0nnections�anks with California Department of Forestry pp location and access on each parcel, or contribute to the water tender fund if established prior to recordation of the map. All ponds or pools shall: be equipped with drafting connectlons. 17. A visual canopy of 80 feet from the tenterline Lumpkin Road will be maintained to preserve the forested look 18. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations, Bruce C. Mitchell - proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding environmental. Impact and Rezerne from U (Uncl assitfied) to FR -2 (Foothill Recreational- 2 acre parcels)located at the southwe , st corner of Hidden Springs Road And Horseshoe Trail, identified as AP 71-34-01i Berry Creek, (File 87-18) This hearing was continued to 1x30 p.in; V. MISCFLLAN�.oUS i BUTTE COUNTY PLNG COMMISSION MINUTES January 21, 1987 Page 18 1. Palermo Honcut Rezone Discussion Item Louise A;hart stated that she owned a 1440 acre cattle ranch in the rezone area. She stated that there is a problem with the subdivision on the west side of their property. She sees a need for controlled growth in the area: She was concerned with preserving agri ultural land. She would like to see, the zoning go to as large a minimum parce-L site as possible. She was opposed to the 5 acre parcels. Vice Chairman Lynch discussed the abatement ordinance for nuisances. Sharon Harvey, Oroville, stated she had 1 acre on Middle Honcut. She was complaining about people and junk in the area decreasing her property values: She also wanted the larger parcels; Vice Chairman Lynch suggested that Ms. Harvey go to the Board of Supervisors with her complaint. He stated that this comes under the abatement. of a, nuisance LUNCH 12:40 to_lt30 p.m. Bruce C: Mitchell. continued from earlier in the meeting. The Commission waived the reading ,of the Staff Findings The hearing was opened to the public: Dorothy Mitchell. read a letter from Mr, and .Mrs. Stout in favor of the rezone. Bruce Mitchell stated that the road not being adequate was in question. He felt this was only the road to their property that was not in good condition. He stated that it was not fixed up because they are not ready to move onto the property. He stated that there are small acre parcels around theirs, some l acrE parcels. He wants to retire on this land with a friend. Vice Chairman Lynch asked if he had any idea who controls Hidden Springs Road as far as mdihtenance. Mt, Mitchell stated he did not k now: He stated that there are two roads to his property, He: stated that he hag legal access to the propertyk Vice 'Chairman Lynch was concerned With access to the property for fire protection, BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION qW MINUTES - January 21 1987 Page , 10 Y g Staff state bthat withou;�oa Road Maintenance Agreement (RMA) it is hnl,.d to the road.. put Vine Chairman Lynch asked if the applicant road and fix the road as a condition from wherewas wthe1roadng oiseno l brush along .the road to his property? longer a County Staff stated that most of the roads in the area are private. Vice Chairman Lynch suggested fixing the road from either Horseshoe T•' Hidden Springs Road to the applicant*s property. Fail or Bruce Mitchell stated from Horseshoe Trail or Lackey Court lie would a remove brush as long as he was not on someone else's propert gree to would agree to improve the road from the gravelled roar' to i He stated he stated that they were going to build one house on the pttperts anyway a ie not see ;5 se impact one more horse would have, Y Yas and already did cleaned out a lot of the underbrush. He said thetsthey �;iavethat wells Ontheproperty: Coirrtissioner Lambert asked if there was any way of putting two houses on the five acres without the rezone. Staff stated that t:ht� 0ommission would have a hard time making rthe findings conformity with tho (,eneral Flan regarding water, sewer,) and access; gs of Vice Chairman Lynch asked if the Commission Permit? could allowtwo dwellings with a Use Staff stated that it could be considered. Vice Chairman Lynch suggested that the Commission could conditio mitigate the problems of the Circulation Element. n the rezone to Commissioner Lambert discussed the mitigation measuras bei attar parcel map, She had 'a problem with making the finding g attached to the discussion on having a Master Environmehtal Assessments(MEA)ere Wi.thaanaabeaef for this area, plan Vice Chairman Lynch suggested the following conditions be added to this project I. Applicant to prove there is a legal 60 ft, tight -of the nearesPublicly maintained road to t,way from if approved. p 1 port he irt, e the building.. p .rmi,t, is fgnali7eg, before ycertificate of Occupancy,� 13efor E y, i nearest nei hbnrin dri.vewa be brought up to County standathe tle:toad to the 5tai,f discussed the CirculAtiort Element. Staff stated that road maintenance from driveway to .property does nothing for the circulation and egress;. Staff stated that very few people get their filial building permits:.. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 21, 1987. Page 20 Vice Chairman Lynch amended his suggested condition 2 to add "state legal easement access and egress to a publicly maintained road." Mr. Mitchell stated that there is another way out if the property through Grey Stone, but you have to pay the man to use the road. Vice Chairman Lynch stated that this might require 'a legal document on file for access and egress. Staff stated that there has to be a deeded right-of-way that could be passed on if the property was sold. vice Chairman Lynch` nsuggested condition 3 .Lear road right: -of -way 20 ft. from . the centerline on both sides to clear brush for fire protection. Staff stated that OF would be concerned ;with where the dry brush went from the roadway after it was removed. Vice Chairman Lynch stated they could have the condition state "to be disposed of in accordance with CDF regulations." rConditio 4 .orProvide 7500 -.gr tender gravity feed water tank and f..ttings app Y fees. olun:eer fire department in Bald Rotk, and a seasonal Staff stated there was a '� fire station un Quincy highway. Vice Chairman Lynch suggested s Condition 5, Structujtes to be bujit with fire' retardent materials no shake roofs'' and anterior sprinkler system to be provided to be fed from.the gravity 'water tank. G. Clearance of bras- 35 ft. away from structures.. Staff stated that some of these conditions ate almost impossible to administer. Lynch applicant is trying to do what is rig Vice Chairman Lynch ht, and stated that the. he 'wanted to h e applicant. He was trying to find some way to mitigate thy: concerns, Staff stated that they are willing to work with the applicant: Vine Chairman Lynch recommended this be continued and that the applicant meet r a see if they can come up with a recommendation that is mutu staff an al: Vice Chairman Lynch stated he would like to sit in on this meeting. Commissioner: Lambert had no objection to the corftinuancF�.• The heating was continued open to March ll, 1:98" at Ot0O a.m Mr. Mitchell "stated he did not plan on building a firetrap; it wild be au safe As possible. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 21, 1987 Page 21 Staff stated they will bring back a recommendation on cost of an MEA for the area on the February ll, 1987 agenda; Staff to submitt MEA as a budget item for the coming year. Vice Chairman Lynch asked if staff could tell the Commission how much it has cost and will cost for the MEA on the Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning area. Staff stated yes,- Commissioner Lambert requested that all future MEAS be structured similar to the Durham -Dayton -Nelson MEA: Commissioner Peabody discussed the area to be in the MEA, possibly from Hwy. 162 corridor to the County line. Staff suggested the Bald Rock, Berry Creek area, Vice Chairman Lynch asked if thev could include Lumpkin Ridge. Staff felt phis was a big bite: BREAK - 2:30 p.m. to 2:47 p.m Butte County Planning Commission - proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impact and Amendment of the Butte County Code Sections 24.54 and 24-55 for the Segregation of Homesites in Agricultural Zones (24-54) and Segregation of Agricultural Processing Uses in Agricultural Zones (24-55) Countywiule. (File 94-7) (Continued Closed from 12/17/86) Vice Chairman Lynch stated that there was a problem with the new covenant attached to the proposed ordinance: This needs 'to be discussed with County Counsel: This hearing was continued to Vtbruary 25, 1987 at 1.0:30 a.m, V. MISCELLANEOUS 1. Palerrio-HoncUt - Rezone Discussion Item continued from earlier in the meetih` g> Staff gave the b„ckground of the project, p j Staff was directed to hook at the A-5 and A=10 zonings: Staff discussed the proposed zones and their boundaries with the maps given to the Commission, Staff discussed where the Generale,... Plan Amendments would be needed if any: r BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION page 22 MINUTES - January 21, 1987 Staff discussed the Resource Conservation Elemen and Mow it affects development. Staff stated if the Commission wants to go forward with this proposal staff can advertise for a range of zones for the areas on the maps exhibited. There was a briefdiscussion on the drainage problems in the Honcut area and with Wyman Ravine., Vice Chairman Lynch stated he would like to see any A-5 zoning kept to a minimum. He wanted A-10 or larger in the large area proposed_ot, the exhibit map for A-5-. There was a brief discussion of the next area to be studied by staff and brougb- to the Commission, north boundary Oroville Rezone area, west boundary this project, down Oro Bangor Highway, Swedes Flat Road area up to Vorbestown Road area. It was moved by Commissioner Lambert, seconded by Commissioner Peabody, and unanimously carried to initiate rezonf;ng and General Plan Amendment for the Palermo Honcut Are;, Exhibits A, B, B1, B2, and C, changing the. A-5 northwest of 8oncut to A-10. Selection of 'Vice Chair and Second Vice Cham: = continued from earlier in the meeting, Commisrioner Lambert felt this selection should be done by the rotation of districts: Staff stated that the by-laws were changed to add the second vice chairman and wa.r4 incorporated Into the by-laws, and staff will see that the Commission receives new copiet Commissioner Lambert requested rotation by district for selection of chair, vice chair And second vice chair so each district will: be represented in a five year period at least once, Vice Chairman Lynch stated that the Chair was District G in 1979, District 1 in 1950, Distrli ict 5 in 1.981; District L in 1082, District 3 in 198 , District 1 in 1984> District 5 in 1985, and Distt'ct 3 in 1986 with District I. again being chair in 1987, Staff stated that the rotation by districts is in the by-laws. It teas moved b Commissioner ssioner Lambert, seconded by Commissioner Peabody, and carried to eleet-Y Commissioner 1,ynch as Vice Chairman for 1087 with the fo`..lowitig vote YES Ccminissioners Lambert; Peabody, and Forbes BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 21, 1987 Page 23 NOES: No one ABSENT: Chairman Walter ABSTAINED: Commissioner Lynch Motion carried. It was moved by Commissioner Peabody, seconded by Commissioner Forbes, and carried to elect Commissioner Lambert as. Second Vice Chatrnan for ,1987 with tho following vote; AYES: Commissioners Peabody, Forbes, and Vice Chairman Lynch NOBS: No one ABSENT: Chairman Walter ABSTAINED: Commissioner Lambert Motion carried, k i't xt s4 5`c :at s< se �'c r COmmissioner Peabody discussed 'having a Joint meeting with the Board. Staff-- stated that the third hearing-a month was for'Planriing issues and to meet with, the various committees and connriiss�,ons, StR4f will inform the Board of the request for,a joint m ission: Commeeting by the Staff also stated that the Boardis aware of the Commission's concerns board is also and the aware of the I1ard work the Commission does, Vice Chairman Lynch Wanted a d,cussion item Put on the next planning Commission' agenda for a dis,,ussit:n on referrals back from the Board, �+ t. There was a brief discussion on a use permit that went to the Board on appeal, had a different plot plan, and Was not sent back to the ComA88ion to review the conditions: to Staff discussed the Commission setting conditions on projects they den�r, Staff Will put this item on the Februar;r ll, 1x87 a e g ncia Commissioner Forbes felt the Chairman of the Planning Commiss the Board hearings of appeals, ion should be at t, v BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIOjq, MINUTES January 21, 1987 Page 24 This will be put on the February 1.1, 1987 agenda -'Denial motes perm�.ts and variances, include propoSeia conditions on agenda, ;secondand on use conditions even motion of thou h denied. g This will be on the agenda under miscellaneous. Comriias, �.er Lambert asked if the Brown Act required the Plane Provide an open forum time and staff stated no, ng Cttnmission to Staff stated that y will get a theCOPY of the changes ill the .groan a discussion item on the agenda February to >'t •:� x :< �'s �'t >`� +� >1xy 11,, 1987. There being no further business this meeting Was adjourned at g:SO p.m, ROBERT LY —a, E CHAIRMAN Butte County Planning Coinmission BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA - January 21, 1987 (Wednesday, 9;00 a.m., 25 County :.enter^ Drive, OrovI11e) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE I'I ROLL. CALL III• Selection of a Chairman for 1987 IV. CONSENT AGENDA - Approval of the minutes fold Dooembbr 1y ano December 17, 1986. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9�0p �.m - California�W�t�r Service ao a Neat .1 v@ Dpi t ar^at i or, rPgarcl i ng environmental i meant ar'►d Use Permit to allow <,; Well for public Water supply, (a public/quasi-public use) on property toned SR -1 (Subu.^ban Residential - 1 acre parcels.) located .on the south side of Shasta Avenues approximately 160 fees east of Cussick Avenue, identified as AP 42--34--1'48, Ch l co. y re ar d i n environmental P 1 easnnt Val 1 eady N 1 h - i7roposed Nec,ratye Decl ar t I tin S g impact and tae ermlt to allow -a 10,000 gallon above g,-0uizrj fuel storage tank on property zoned M-1 (Licht Industrial), C-2 (Genera~ Commercial), located bete,: yen the Esplanade and F"flghwaY 99 ,Just north of Nord H i ghway y Identified as AP G-40-54 , Chico. Robert Peacher - proposed Mj_tJllc�.ate . Neat iye Decl arat on regarding d17v i ronmental impact and UsaPerl t 4zo a i 1 ow a changtj in a pre-existing nonconformino use from an aQ processing building to storage ard repair of contractors equ i Pmeht and storage of i n f1 oMmab 1 es In a ta011 tr #-.ruok &o praperty toned SR -1 (Suburban Residential � 1 acre parcels) located at the northwest corner of Butte Avenuo and Miller ,Avenue, 'identified AP 39-81-28r Chico, Butte _Coon v Pl ann 1 hq Comm 1 +^s_i o t propcised e at i Mg Ccl brat i on regard i ng environmental i mpzgot andego to R n.e cionfoam to the General Plan from U (unclassified) and TM -40 (T 1 mber hiounta i n- 40 ocr,-. parcels) to SR-, ('Suburban Residential - '1 acre parcels), SR -6 (Suburban Residential - 5 acre parcels), rR-40 (P:Ooth i l l Recreational '40 acre parcels), A-$ (Agricultural - 5 acre parsce 1 s ), Aa -40 and A-160 (Agricultural 40 and 160 acre parols) located on both sides of Cohasset road and Kee fw- Road from approximately 112 mile West to 2 1/2 m Iles east of the Cohasset load} Keefer Road intersection, north of Chico. (File e7-2) BUTTE COUNTY PL.AMN T COMM i SS I ON AGENDA - Ja, !nary 21 , 1987 Pago 11 it : 15 -a . m . BREAK a , m' . - Frost _ and Lua"z_ Eng l veers - proposed Begat i ye,_�arae 1 �B regarding environmental impact and Rezone from FR --40 (Foothill Recreational - 40 acre parcels) and R"r-i/2 (Minimum Density Residenhi,=l Mobile Home, 112 acre parcels) to RT -1 (Minimum Dente1ty Residential Mobile Home) , FR -1 and 40 (Footh 1 i l Recreational -- 1 and 41) acre parcels) for property located south of South Paris Drive and west of Athens Way, Identified as AP 51-03-41� wes'b of Paradise ( f i 1 �r 87--12) ( Cont i need open froml Ir' -1/ 17/8e) Roy and Carol Nat- i eta Proposed hit 1 gateci Ne_gbtj vo Dec l ,arat l on regarding env i K-uomenta'a impact and BlIggahe f ilom FR' -1 0 (Foothill Recrea,c i ona l -- 1,0 acre parcels) to FR -5 (Foothill Recreational 5 acre parcels) for property located on the south side of LLJmpkin Road at the intersection of,, Ponderosa Way, identified as AP 71.06-49 (ptn) , Feather Falls area . (file 86-45) (Continued. open from 12/17-186) Bruce C . Mitch+�`l - proraosed M i t i 4atedeat l .re Declaration r~eraard i n8 env i r,onment,al t mpac.t and gezona From U (Unclassified) to FR -2 (F,t hhiTl Recreatiaial 2 acre Parcels) 1 oca";ped at the southwest ozarner of Hidden Springs - Road and Horseshoe 'Tra i l l i d'pnt i f l e;d as ,AP 71-34- Q l 5 Berry Creek . (File 87-18 Butte Courity Fel ann In - gLGomm1 s_.1 ori proposed Neq�t iye Dec arab ii on regardinenvIronmental impact and .AA eB menu cif_ hhe Butte County _ Csac•e Section 24-54 and 214--55 foe, the Segregdtion of Homesltes in A2ricultur-al Zones t24-54) and Segregation o Aorlcultural Processing Uses In Agricultural 'Zones (24-55) Countywide. (File 64-7 (Continued closed from V17/86) V MIOCELLANFhlj Ir BUTTE COUNTY PLANN COMM I SS I ON AGENDA January )XI 1987 (Wednesday, 9:00 a.m., 25 County Center Drive, Orov i l l e) I.. PLEDGE. OF ALLEGIANCE TI ROLL CALL III. Selection of a Chairmanfor 1987 CONSENT AGENDA - Approval of the ,minu' ror (december Aand December 17, 1986. 13 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS < ti 9%00 a m. C 1 1 f orn a ter e-v i —ompao pr ;ed atec� Negative ec tion" and envir nta act ! d Use P rmi o owl a ell r public wat uppi publl qua b is use)' p oper zone IWOSR-1 C roan Resi �ial - 1 e p ) l ed on the s side of Sha to e roc' 1 y 1 ee ast of s ek ue� P i ed as 42-34 Da o. As ant e d propose Ne4at:i a Oeclaratlon reg di vlr-o ntal m act 1 U, mit to allow a t0 11on a ve groan fu for ank property zone. -1 (Light I nstr i a l -2 era l rc i s ) 1 .d h" tween t e ' 'pla I and H1 hway just n' of id ie AP 6-40-54, o. obeuache pro sed ed N' i e _D ration ra_ga�' d ` g en nm i mpact and IJ Perm i allow a change In n p e-e i ng noncohfor i use an a j. processl 11 to age and epair contractors u pme nd age nF1' ab1 es In ankor twiacl< ��n rope zone -1 urba identi 1 acre par ) l Gated at e nortst cor of Butte Avenue on I enue, Identif d as A 81.28 Chico. io + to nt n i nit i ss i on �- proposed Negat i hVe uq c d ora rd i ng .r i ron e 4,:a1 impact anoa 1pdhe to cc:n rcr^iii to General 1 an U ( uniti ass i f l ed) and 40 S- 'T.I r Mountain - 4 re parcels) to SR-1 bur esid al e parcels), SR-5 (Suburban sl rit'Ta a .pa t), FFt-40 (Foothill Re conal 0 acre cels), A-5 (AgricuiLural - 5 a parcels), A-40 A-160 (Agricultural - 40 and 160 ac parcel s) l 6cat m both s 1 des of Coi asset Rosid and Keefer d frot oxiMately 1/2 mile west to 2 1/2 miles of t �ohastet Road; Keefer Road intersection, north Ch1co. R1le 87-2) OUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COKM I SS I ON AGENDA - January , 1987 10:15 a.m. BREAK 10:30 a.m. - Frost and Lusk Engineers - proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impact and Rezone from FR -40 (Foothill Recreational 40 acre parcels) and RT -1/2 (Minimum Density Residential Mobile Home, 1/2 acre parcels); to RT -1 (Minimum Density Residential Mobile Home)$ FR -1 and 40 (Foothill Recreational - l and 40 acre parcels) for property located south of South Park Urive and west of Athens Way, identified as AP 51 -X08 -»41y west of Paradise. (file 87-125 (Continued open from 12/17/86) Roy and Carol Napier_ - proposed Mitigated jqZ Live Declaration regarding environmental impact and Rezon) from FR -10 (Foothill Recreational - 10 acre parcels) to FR -5 (Foothill Recreational - 5 acre parcels) for pt^operty located on the south side of Lumpkin Road at the Intersection of Ponderosa Way, identified as AP 71-06-49 (ptn), Feather Falls area. (file 86-45) (Continued open from 12/17/86) - Bruce.C. Mitchell - proposed'Mitigated.Negative Declaration regarding environmental impact and Rezone from U ( Unclassified) to FR -2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) located at the southwest corner of Hidden Springs Road a` ' Horseshoe `Grail, identified as AP 71-,34-01, Berry Creek., File 87-18 Butte County Planning Commission - proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impact and_imendment of the Butte County Code Section 24.54 and 24-55 for the Segregation of Iomesites in Agricultural Zones (24-64) and Segregation of Agricultural 'Processing Uses in Agricultural Zones (24-55) Countywide, (File 84-7) (Continued closed from 12/17/86) V MISCELLANEOUS 1. Palermo_Honcut Rezone DiBa ssibn Item VI. CORRESPONDENCE VII ADJOURNMENT