Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES & AGENDAS 1-13-77 -- 2-24-77�4* , 0IITTE COUNT` rLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 13, (577 i7 P 48 4. Y�::z q a J H.'. FL 0CE F ALLE,GI:AN,CC 0 I-1 , ROLL GALL; Present; Commiss.:oner Thpbach, Sm�'th,,, 6lat,terrd, Ci°lbe�rt, < Moore, Carenxi rsy, . atson and Chai rmarl Nan ford: Absent:; Commissioner le Clere Also present. Bettye Clair, Ja,y McKeeman', l{owOrd Toussaint, John Mendonsa, Del Sielosorr, Royal Caulkins Chico Enterprise; Record-and,Ha`2el4n611a`s III 11VPROVAL OF KNUTES FOR December 30, 191:7, Approved with . from the bottom nc ange "C of ' to Kutz , ' Page 4A,� �nd� r�tord' i n whc; l;'l iJ`h, l�.i ne change "Coots" �� �� IV PUBLICNFARIROS A. APP6L Ul' SU'TTC COUNTY' BOAMO'OF -4ONING AbJUSTMv1T DECI910N UENYINQ USE P� MIT is 8. Norley - Use permit tb aljbW' a tnatonry supply store, 57 mini-storage units, r,std two commercial service buildings to include a boat; ropair sh,gp, aiut;0" repair, sheet metal contractor, akito and hoa't uphol�t'ery shap , coned A-2 Ltd. plumbing contractor, electrical contractor and, a cabinat maker on property � " r►, located orr'' the east 04,0 of Clary Read, approximately 1800 ft .sogl:h of Busrhmann Aoad, identified as AP "i4-` l'2-3�, Paradise. 77-48-2-571 Mrs. Blair reviewed the action of the Board of 2ohinq Adjustmeht and rend orohosed conditions, of aporldva1. Propohents� Lewis E. 'Harkey stated', that he is a maso'nry� contractor; q lands;capdd, and would be an that the�� bui l di n . would � be attract# yes asset, to the area. He further rommented that there was a, need in Paradise for every stype of business nroposed at this,location4 In rr�uponse to a ostion from one of the Commissioner"s., he stated that there would moil,, be a great amount of outside storaje,` Opponents: Marjorie Cox, 5,185 Clark Road, {,aradise, objected (69 to -this, type .of--what she ycall'ed Ti-qht comme.rciol development--and. commented that business offices"would be more i,n keeping w th Ahe _. - i BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 13 , 1977 area. She asJ..ed that constructic►o of purbS - guttoy-s and sioeWra1iC,s . ry .no'i; 6 1` m'pnsed rogarbloss 6f-the-evo16`pItent p�`aposed.l ...She�'raad lettors� in Opposition from 'Vincent 0. Garadino, 5510 Clark Road; Or, Mrs„ iiarre, 72 Clark Road; and tho manager of the nearby mobile home park, She addedthat Mrs.d1' Donato who had received use permit Pecently to, op�erate &� weddii.ftq chapel $ust-�aicooss the street from the subject pro. ejrtj► had requested that Mr, C,ox express her opposition to this Vgnttjre. '� pplicatinonn�as en for that at the.' time Mrs. Mr. Horkey s y , di°Donato .,,a p consideration she had made ctimments In favor of,hi e, proposal ,' The hea:rihd was closed and motion was made by Commissioner Gilbert for denial'of the appeal, finding that the proposal was 'not in coni- formity u,+th the Geheral Plan 'As to re'oommended de�sity�-.and in ord',;-r to uphold the integrity of the area this project should be denied bocau� bbya.uge of'.tissi' osoos sibte he -Smith: detrimental effects. His motion was seconded 'me AYES- Commissioners Camenzind,, Gilbert, Smith, 'Watto'rs and Tf .ehach. NOES: C.ommiWoners Moore, Watson and Chairman Hanford, (Chairman strict conformity that even; though the proposal is not in Hanford commented t i th the Genor6'-1 Pl ari that there Is commercial use on both sides of the street and that she d1d reverse her oriO;nalvote on the Boas of zoning Adjustment.) ABS`ONt'to mmissiotior Le C1p�b, Motion harried; The App'l ican t was a rpraised a the ;appeal poriod, B,, APPEAL' OF' UUTTC COUNTY DOARD CC ZONING ADJUSTMENT DECISION AP'PiOUINO USE PERMIT 1 E, M, Wo,st - Use permit to allow a'septic system and parkin for -an adiacont bowl ino, al leynn prdod'�tq tonod 44 Ltd" 1r�dated on the no►�th side b# Oagsta'ff Road,,, 2M Vit. nasi: of Clark !loath ifthti- fi'dd at APSO-172 -1 ti' 14 Paradi s6 77-48.9-990 Th, b staff findings were reviv+ped b,y'Mr�s. P1a'ir as were thb bonditions, of apprbval by the Board of 7onin.q Adjustmeint do Uedember Si She d1to read the,'letter of appeal by Mrs. Hods6h, I. r` BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTCS - Januar,y 1;1, 1977 Mr.. Mendonsa' s tated that ,.Mr• 14 s t,t, e { yy iy y� h t►,p P ATCAp-t��,- haa t �d ;with_ 017 R:'+ V .5 z� n , ti'Pro ., , qtr .. ,thy ear n af .h,d;bl �:c.�ylorrl� an:� hada worked. out apasa'1 fc.r drains e, 'I the easterltiy fide of 1,h,e prop;e.rt,,y at Wagstaff. He, stated hat engineering plans h,ad not !seen submitted, last Tuesday,, perv11 had a , but that the 'Uoard ai' Su pprgved thi,g con of drain- age `Phoepohent.s Earl'; Hodson, 666'5 `twin Oaks br ve, P'ara:dise, insisted that developers do not have an easement and asked that plans be mada in sufficient detail, prior to approval,,, so that -the coin issidn wo<uid a not approve a blanket program Brian Rix, attorney for the Paradise Recreation llistrict,: assured the Commission that his clients were not abandoning their use but that this drainage permit, q proposal was being, considered as an alternate io order to expedite the development' because of the financing problems that might arise with long delays, Counsel Siems(,n stated that he was unable to verify the existence of a drainage easement adjacent to the subdivision. Maxim N, Bach, 12'81Montgomery St. 9 ,Y Oroville,ttorne for the, property problems e�c9$tar and uestione;d yo,a staid that, some�sevios �' __ �► _ arhether the creek bed, would ode uatei owners ti the are carr,' the a, ar6esti ne, � Glen e q y • ge. He stated that an envi ronmental impact re. port should have been, prepare, ;for. a project that Would, direct in-� , ►greased di°a nrm ra�..a age across the property of another, and rc"min,ded °the Commission that the alternate drainage proposal discussed earlier was not the question before them tonight.. Irian Rix commented 'khat the final map of Shadybrook Subdivision was approved by the Uoard .of Supervisors ori March 26, 196 and.that all offers of dedication had been a,ccepte.d. Harold Welborn, 795. Ripley Lane* said, that the d-rain>agei computations had ;} made bychgineer Botsford which showed that .the. bowling alloy wouldcontributeonly 9% of the water to thic drainage _an el that Public Works had agreed with his findinils � channel _ and In response t0 -A question, Mr_. Topussaint sold that the sewage p was accet p,ohle to '(iis depart t ,au; t as soars as the ap- roradsa pli�o�ant; records t P, required, easemeli;ts Mr. Hodson state,i that the ditch prdoosed for ute was 'not zi natural drainage chahttel but an oldiwater transportation ditch, private propet^ty, and yuestZpned that one commercial developer thbuld be .al:T owed to burden other property owners with rosponsi hi l i t,y ani,! l iobi ii ty for the ditch of ssioher.`gMlth said that she Would 11.ke to novo Counsel �pbut n R 4 h BUTTE COU'NrY PLANNING 'COMMISSION MINUTES January 13,, 1977 egai�d'in` s`the'' easettents 'b"efo'l e a de'is ion.- i s ' dF' a +Ghg,i,hMa,n N n;rrOrd {i then ol6sed �t`he �h+earin�r�''a��i'da h�ot�i°d'n�wask`de by, Cofjjmis1'on`er GA the f seconded by Commissioner Moore, for demo' df thea 'goal, finding that the con ,ditiot s on the brig n0 .arI�proV'A1 of �:he nprt�erly 100 f;t# of the area outlined in the 'plan �ul�mitted' 'by the.. applicant 'were p1"onpr and 'finding that the proposed use is is in cm*, 11a�ice_ with this` General Plan and finding tie use would have no horinful efftdts``an the nei ghborhood or t),d co(intyr AY.ESt_ CoinmissiunCi^s Camenxind:', Gilbert, Moore., `Th'eb4,Ch Smith, .tatters, Watson and Chairman Hanford, NOES: No one, " - AMNT: Commi ssi over Le Ci'erc Motion carried. Con.d tions of apptioval are: l� Subject to finding by County Counsel that a'Val,d drainage ease- ment had been accepted from the northeast oo`rner of the property, and .subject to ,the Department of public Works' approval" of. plebs and installation of required facilities. pj. Subject to granting easeMent ;requiiled' "on Ap 66-4`72-14 for s,eWager dfspa'sal. " 3.�i ' Sul j ect to Heat th Depa rtmeh�t's approval' of .septi c pl airs ' an*d'; intWila'tior of facilities. Aoolicant mutt also compIy with a 1 othi�r applicable st"ktOtes, ordinances, and reguIatibns ----both local and'State. The appellant was app'r086�d of the �dppc:alp e'riod �nrmaii L. 5•overeign P� Ui]liain A, '-Maylan � 'U F�e n�-Mi t, to allbw, a cabinet shop and auto 'parts s- tore .on prooerty zoned, "A-2 Ltd." located' on the southwest corner -oi`� Pontna Drive and skywav-, idp%nti fied as .AP ;1-104,95, P�iradi'se- 77-0-1.095+147' Dai rman Hanford agkod that Vice Chairman ryi 1br:r-tconclOtt this ho,arinq slii;ce sho h° so�r�e p rti'rent odmtierl''ts1 vegardino this issd'o. BUTTE COUNT" PLANNING COMMISSION, MINUTES January 13 1977 rd;, h�, x��aappeal. lyetta,rF .:f �ri:n�, .Mrs •r ;klow,.r hu:i`a.'+��itilaa. onitheroaecteb ade�i'1so �ihe ori��i� p 1al conditions of a nroval p�'aced project ,, y h. Roap4 of zpn ;nq,,Adjust,mento Mrs. Huff asked if the operation would not, bo ,a garage anal TMe,.;_ „ Sovereign statod that there would be some In,stalla`tioh of ac_ cessories such as winches, hubs, roll -bars', etc,, that al;T-Mgr chandise would be new and that the operation was"not in the nature of a repair garage, •He further stated that the :propos-ed- use of, the building would be about 50% for the parts and accessories. and. SO for the cabinet shop Propon,�ntst Howard'Huff, 65--�,Montno Drive, expressed concern about the noise and asked that a buffer zonebe established be- tween, th.e industrial and rosidential uses int the area. Commiss;oo- er Wa.ttors su'gges'ted that the residents ask the Commission for more restrictive zoning. Thi' practicality, of this, suggestion was questioned since so'much of the areo along. Skyway is already in commercial de- velopment",- Tom M0111, 8366 Montna Drive, ?,Xpressed concern (59 1 of th;e abuse of the approach to, the residential :area,.of Montna Drive, objected. to the industrial flavor of the proposeO establishment but not to the retail portion. 1 ' Jean pressner, 1052 Molakai Drive, :w.as .�toncerned ab,9 it potential traffic and noise, Tom McGill 81366 nblejti'that ,�roting other residents oftheareaunaen,oa-ttedvho wereconcehned about the preservation of their residential area, Norm Sovorei gn 'o0mme0ted that t11he dotmet.,cf,al venture 1woul',d be on Skyway, with only the°a , :one ccess fr.bm Skyways and that, i t �wou,l- be at least 160 ft. from the rear property line. He sbbmitted letters in favor of the venture, ,from property owners neaeest yhis existin,q business, as well as a petii:ion with lO signatures of other nearby res i,den ts'--nios t1 v a1 on g S kywaV,, Conmissioner Watson su§gested that shrubs ,b'e' planted, al,oh+g nroonrty stated that Wa s part of their +prop"o sed plan. 1 oea � � �Mr, Soverei There being no other cbmmentt 'Frog the :audience, the hearing was closed. Motion was madeby Commissioner Hanford, secondea by Ceffl-0,ssione.r 'Smith, to' Opho1 d the aprietl, fi'ndihq that even :t on sidering the scattered =used of "Va ryi fiq °type"s'of comtnoPCia1 ventures along Skyway that to approve this proposed use for a cabinet shop and. auto parts store, and installation of auto partsi, is not c0- patible With other uses in the area and is possibly ipjuelous to the neighboehood because of Potential ,ro'ise and °posjbl# 'traffic geoeration. .. . ... .. .t Il .,. L ._ �_....____,_... _. _-. .. ...... .,. . .... _ � 4 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 13t l s77 5 .�xp�p NEAi�NY�N+ �R�1{4'C1iVzr1�M�TA'i,+1Ps�ee!i� 'fit"','`',`` ' x 1. Butte County ;Board of Supervisor's (76-84) - 'Aet6ne from "S -R" (Suburban Res iden t11al1� ++ to S_R (Suburban Re,�iden- tial ) property located on. 'the south Side of Stilson Canyon 'Road'' the north 'side of Doe Mill Road arid. tiro ea;„t• side =of B,r 6e Road, mbi a Par�tfdular`1,y de' cri.b'a°d ; E 1/2 of pec. T29N, '92t hw1/'and the i4 1/;2 q`f tie That portion a'9� t e i M�S�h1 `located south of the centersthe, of Stilsoh CanyonRoad,,- That po`r^tions Of $'ectfons-28 & 20, T22N;'�%�:E MgR M bounded an the north by, Littl Ch cd'Creek, Caravan Subdtvis"I dr a +►... : , ori the east4b� tha 4Jesterly lino of Sttilson P m rec�trded tri -ook' ,34 on pages 41 & 42, of the Butte Count Retorde.r, on the south of "Rack t3luff", and on the tveSt yy by Fhe west l i ne of the 1 / of the C1`/2 of. said Sec. 29. Containing 36 more or 1,ess � aCre,Sy fid?-h99�111 ljr. MgIX6ernan ,gave a sh'o•1^t htttoi v ,n• f, zohipg of this area statin l: ;'that its,,had,,b'een a:ara9,n fsent bac'k' °ia the C"omini 'ssion for aot'iloh., "Ne reported: On December 18, 1975 the Commission approved° the '`�ahi mission i'bitiated 'nropbs,al••fbr Ihie canvom to ,rb2bhe from A 2, ` 5R-1; A,,M°and A*160'., (The Cominissioft' •`'rec'a>n�nendatibh wad"'fb-�1'�1�0 on! the• tubjett, property 4 Board S" � 'On Januar ,2?� 176 the et the 'firsi. ,nt�itlic Irea�rin�gan.d +seht the' nrbposal back , oto the Colli s loo for i^•evi ttw. Af ter .die dem liberation the 'Commission moved to uphold thoi r original retommen dation. This report wad made to th,e; • C,oard oi. Pebruar�v 10, 19°7,6•. On March Zy 1976 the Board' =adopte-d .SR,*'l, A�10 -mid A,1601onino, deletihq certain areas (the area under considernttun tonight being one of those deleted and rezoned to SR), Subsequently a suit was filed apaio;,t tIve 4oar4for this actio"n. The suit centered around the roz+otri no of the S-R arca. Ott 4/5,17'6, the proriBoard eerezonedaSytRhe Planrtirrr rominission rehear the zohinq. for the State the Board did not re proposal has been labeled ."S�R+' t0 "5evious zo -R'+� nig action, the Ij s�.�ind the r 1 n t� s - - _ ., , �..:.0--- ,:tea, .. . -,-. :,:. _.•.:. ,i...k _ _ A. BUTT`r COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MiNUTI $ -.January 13, 1977 r Line Mll 6man#�e; ke tl�t,ert,� ��'�'.�"�oi�lpp'�e fi��de+pp4 P�g�.17.� the"i" from "the 'top iii wards "'outside urban areas'" be inserted after the 'word- "Act" He furthev stated that the nein Cnvironmew1al Review Gu,idelInes nowrewire that the decision=making body on`th project finalize the environmental impact report --and thatthis Commission's " action would be to make recommendations to the board of Supervisors. Ne a.dded,ihat the City of Chico had sent a letter indicating that they had revised their spheres of influence and that the project was 66 1bngdr Wlth`ih their sphere of I fluenco, Proponents: David Rush, Route 6:, Dox 75F -B commanded the Planning staff gh thei'r eval uati ens made i'n the draft and commented than other persons were in agreement with him that A-10 zoning will con - r... iinue to be ap�iropriate for the area. John Sthool'ing, Route 5, Bax 79JA, Chico, questioned the first. sentence in the second from the last paragraph on Pago 3» He also questioned the accuracy of the min on Page 19 showing City of Chico's sphere of influence. Elmer Johnson asked (638) that Page 6, Pa,ragraph.6 be changed to indicate that the refuse transfer site on Brune Road has not b.00.n abandoned. He added that this operation has been in existence for M-25, years and that his �experienceower the years wL5, that iyou. , had to "dynoniteidri11 :an ! 1ow'" to put., in s:eptic��tank-s in tYt""alrea and it is no place for dense development. y The hearing was closed &'nd rConlmissioner, Watters, commenting that tko �Commis'sion is sti11 , cohsid'erihq draft 'enviV10"mental i'mpac`t reports without benefit of information cbncerofng the fiscal "impact of the project, made a motion to recommend certification of this ,enVironmchit,al impact report with, the inclusion of comments lode,'at this meeting, Nis motion was seconded by Commissioner Thob;,ach, Commissio;hers Camenz.ihd; Gi'lber M AYES:oorej The,bach,aSmith, Watte�rg � WAtsbh anal O ai rmon Nanfordh NotS No one. Ag,S- `f; 'C6Mtn i'ssioner Lo. Clerc Motion Car'iried, 4 i GUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINIMS w danuary 13 1977 Z 2 .Jahn A Shelton (76-4,8Y-,-,, Z ,1 t One .prom A.,�I4^�G r� .., i ty>.es"e�lt,ia`( onhe� north�;`prolr�'er t�ocated� i.do of Shas,t:a Ave. ► approx. 3CC ft east of Esplanadet, i denti flied as Ap 444 362, .more pdr� t9cu ah1Y doa.ril>od ass,.' �.Jatl 8 :off.mera,1 da T:^act par MaP of R:ec�Yd iM Map Book '1 on Page 33 of the `Butte' Ca46 12ta,,:order, and a portion of Lot 4 o1` said ''E°smer.._ alda Tr.a,ct" ,described. as follows; -Etc. nnin,gata Point 0n the easterly, line of s�iid Igo lariat ,19t1,G ft.OUtherl,from the from the northeast corner,of'said Lot 4 thence wres~Me- Iy� paallel 'viith. the north 1„tine -of valid Lot 4 300 ft thencu goutheOy a't r” 11 g h t ang1�e 433.9 ft thonlsq ,e4sterl;v at right angle app ft, to the eafii:el.ly line of said Lot,' thence nnrt11OrIv 410119 said easterly ;l,ine 03.9 ft, to the Point of i�og':�nning. Containinq 133.0 acres more or less', Chico 77-80-�-999+�5 Mr. McKeeman r,; DvIted that he - had been instructed'by the 13oaH, -of Supervisors to procoss this envihonmental impact rQport which had :been prepa►^ed by Ecn-Anal,ysts, cons,tiultants, of Chico. A letter from n�, deiluty Att ` n Kin. arne,y General, was read: L a r r,Y C ii rJ Dete-nib e� , 1576 Mr. ,bani.el. $ c :s tbclC COUtlty Counsel. tutee County 1$43 'Rob i<tit. on s tmie t feat batt• 1 ;fee. Jo ti A. Shed tbn Ro_zbne rbr youtl .Itfl, t»0 t1t.4e)t10tt I have, -&ftaehl�da riv off' the draft en�r a~ inrrie� L:a . ,o,, ac � ai t: e brni�ttbsa to the t�t�e- C l lar aria• hcu�e +on the ab�re pi ec b F 1 This proposed re2one h1&h11,'6wh s A PA Which vil.� be i 1;; I 1 BUTTE. COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 13,, 1977 cru cr�urlt t» .. Throposed development T ' .fin ta�speca.i~ c ease,nvol,�res M:,,t��t on �.3es 'l�bi`3.s 4ensity is in excess of that, eha,•ri on the Butte County Land We Llement t4ap It would they,-" xe� be impossible dor Butte County to make the rtuisite fixidUgn , as requixed by Govern- me.nt. Code sect= o'ri_ .65490. A rezoning such as the one proposed an, tIlls ca-So"woUld ne4.0-ssa�t to sn amwndmeut" ai` your county's land'use eld4t en t . - The purpcssaZ o this letter i,s to bring thi specifi(t project to you a`ttenti,on and to emphasize the importance that this oglxc0 and the Off1.ae of �la�t�aang and.Ras,ea �6l-. place on the 0auex`�en,'t Cade requitete•o t:s -ot findings . Although out di,scus'si.o ns, i xx tie past; havoe oexit;ered bas xc lly on the mi e s x.n0 dements . a� the zl tGe. County OenerAl Plan, x bel leve i.t ;s important �'or your, cou,41ty to came t;ul.l.y consider the problems rests -t ink ,rr��n xncons s tee cies be�t�� ec , the :xis tar►g land txs e em .;4xtd deue'! op.nent� as it 'i s occurr�nd in your county. Careful. corlsiderat"Lon should be g: ven for scheduling an early revision of the existing' ng land use elo.vnent. Please advise me .a£' x a . am mistaken concerning, they GQnsst~en.cy, of the proposed Shelton pkezone v21.th yotit ,existing land use element Very truly yours 7.1" \!1.'rLitt j 'YQIMG`l 7X11;VIJ.4 Y'ey Getieral. LARRY 0. XING De.put y Attotne, General. " Mrs MckbeMan said there ,had been no Cbftb tts front the State 'C?¢jrinev House and that the review period had lanseds r Commissioner Camenziod questioned Mr, McKeeman_as' to the location of the project in relation to the urban boundary line as adopted in the Subdivision Ordinance, Mr, McKeeman indicated that the project was within the urban boundary, but that the proposdd deh0 try (ap.proxi - mately 10 units' per acre) was not in conformance with the Butte Country Land Use Map density recommohdat1ohs Mahn Chambers, representirra his parents who are present owners of the property cbMmetited that both Shasta and Lasep Drainage Districts egtbm,�6sted part of the property and asked onl„v that his pia reht,s be permitted to Oo'nsummate the pending s0e- which teas based on the abi 1 i ty to rezone the property as proposed, x —BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING C'OMMISSIO'N MINUTES - Oanuar,y 13, 1977 Commissioner Watters was concerned that the growth inducing impact of this ro.,iect. w not—adoquair t�•e ate �n._t a f h t at� t e d n o'hino`' f sort' `t.i�s c `� "�: }d. �, , h ,�'d r f h e i:s , c"t. an thou: i dke'O' an r.brorted` thaIt ha i^e "),ehS �s had, beer received 1'r;otgn the departmoht''s inquiry. ost p n The Commission postponed mak recommendations cr1. r�'this- matter fot tato weeks for the receip ofrg r,� more informat+ion p r`ticuirat^1'V concerning the growth-inducing impact of the'' project an'tl comm0rn't+s 1 dist ict. ,., from t e schoo , - , a IV,E APPEAL OP 5NV1RONMrNTAL REVIEW CORMITT�E's DEC )ISI N THAT NECAT1VE .DULARATION .REGARDING,, ENVIRO 4IE14TAI, IMPAC BE :a'� ED. 4 1 ..i oh.o, Math:eiUs"e '0'ertI t to, allow vvwmi141 antd' lumber manufacturing plant on pirbte'rty "ton6rl A� located on the .east side of Hioks Laneprox. 500 ft. north of Sycamore Creek, contai tti ng 5 acres, more or less. AP 44-01-55 ptirt ionj, north o,i Chico 17-51.-i 31" - c It was explained by counsel that the new thVieonmentalluidelin!z require that a.p eals to Negative Declaration ,be he,�Od bye 30 of .5uper'visors. r b Bob Lane, g Cabal to Ways Chico,, thin appe1"1antoo6estioned 'Whj%''th',� matter was oh tonight's agenda and why he and his some Z5-30 supporters thou! d have to wai t unti 1 after 1111:001 P. K, to" fihd no action could be taker*. ' Mrs' a1 ai .e explained that t'he' nd � gui,del i hes were adopi`.ed by the Board of ' Su already edryti Fred the sort on Tuesday, January 1 i , and that ss,taff had 1 the agendas and no he appellant and a:'ppl�i cant p u rs uah tto the of d guide 1 i nes,., " y Mr. Lane questioned that an ehviroh ohtal impact had not been re- quirod because of the question of safety, additional thi'ic, "air' pollution and econoitiiic impact of�,'s'uch� a �orejot"t� Re sa'i,d that for electricity to run 600 HP` motors and that ,a sawmi 11 was a ding applicant had lade app!l i cati on to Kaci fi c., °Gas and E1°ectr'i c` Compa business and that an envi ronmen'tal impa4tt report s'houl d ,be requi rreded , Tho ep'plicantr ,John Manth!fli wa,s,'present bout OkI licked toc speako. Hearing no comments to the contrary,'Chairman Hahf-oY,d a-sked that,, a report be made to the Hoard that the Commission woUi'd request BUTTE COUNTYPLANNIyta commis�.iON MINUTES - January 13, 1977 the Commission, of adhering to deadlines s t by some, other body (769) and:.asked that all c0m.miSsione'rs 'm kp A0 a fo.rt'to .atteh'd t)tes,e me,etinc�s. C, POSSIBLE RESTRUCTURING OF' COMMIS$0N 77-91-1-780 Board of Supervisors far eestr6c�turing the Commie day Set of the Commissioner Watters asked if,_next Tuesda is th ssion, .staff com- mented that a report is to be presented, at that time`, by the corn- I mittee making the study. Chairman Hanford stated that it was her understanding that there are three gb'ject 'ves; , htheir pt4aposal to restructure the Commission: 1. Eliminate city-appointed mtm'bers on the Commissia.. 9. Make the terms c Me Commissioners co:' de wity 3f the Board memuo, and E 3: Changing the quorum to make it a majority of those r.rreserit. CountyPlanning Commission cannot function properi at 6t Several of the Commissioners ex` ressed ;strong feelin s th y without city participation. Commissioner Cemenzind disagreed. Comraissi'oner`Watters (941) expressed concern that some members of the Uoard downgrade staff for erroneous reasons. Commissioners Thebach, Watson and Uilbert expressed the feelings that recommendations to the Board should come from the cities coneerned­"trot from the Commission: A diseus5ion followed regarding,a memo to the Board from-tho Commission eX1ressing the'i'r concern as to composition of the planning COMMission Motion was made by Commissioner Watson, seconded by Commissioner Thebach, to report to 4heboard that the consensus of this tot issiorl is that the Commission has performed its duties without regard to political influence nor any special interest influence of any City member and that WWe frjrthoe consi der the city members to be a vital component sof the county planning, and further that city irpat to su ervisors regarding city members be actively solicited, nYCS: Commissioners Thebach, Smith; Natters, Watson and'" hairmtn Han,fo!md NOES* CoMmissioners Camerrxnd,: Gilbert andi'ore �s BUTTE OWNTY PLANNING COMMISSION,. MINUTESJanuary 27, 2977 A4A, Cr �!'}e U,L+ CAL, ;: Pyo' sent. Coxo3lssaanersW C tm'et� anc�, e G arcMoore, tr, Smithy, Watters -fas'ent: Com�n�i i4ioner.s °Tli6bach �$ Jlatspn �Watso,n' i 1:so .Present, Jam Lawson, Jay, 'cXeema�jl, Del Siemsen, Jinn 'S1Cj a staff ' (Ch'co ht�texprise F�eeora',)l and Hazel ,Dallas rT' IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minu:t6s. for the meeting of January „13, 1D77 were approved with the following correction; Page 3, 'Ist. ;Lane in the third paragraphitfrom the top change "Di-StAct" to "Corporation" I'V. PUBLIC I= WIXNG8 A. APPEAL OP BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OP ZONING Al)JUSTMBNT DtCISION DENYING USE PERMIT - - - I ._ Ch rtes Jamas ..,;Use :permit to, .411011, -,four .2-ibedtoom ,dtilPIOXes', on,e 2.-bedroow'tviplexj arao'essory';park ng and septic facilktios on, Ptop,erty toned AIA-2 Ltd.." located 660 fti south of Elliott load, identified as ,AP: a,nd a portion :of AP P.aradise so Law ew Mr+ a n rexw` ed the action of the Board of honing Adjustment. Proponents; Charles James stated that a use permit had already been ' 'irarited" for bvelb Mont df, ,a 'iit" .i br brt ,pan b this -Pr ert and i'ha g P a p p. p y this was a change .in the arrangeine-At of ,the build. * '' ,s to use the land to a better advantage He further stated that his proposal hay been' app o�tec''1r� t]i�f Po.' tlo 9,e TiTe. Protection District and,that he ' s r ui td''instal " wie�th+er fire hydrant,, He added that there VOUIA be, 11",units pin approximately 2 aereg. , t Opponentsi No ones �C'h'e heal}�n�va� eltise•�.': (9�9j oftit g io'ier i1) b"' 61t .o`tinlnloi�ted that writh ,the additional information „ TN ;T7 7� BUTTh COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION M NU7.`DS January 27, 1977 ; svhmitted by the applicant at -this meeting that even though he had ao a dp is iiho> motion fear dprU by i 0 "BOLLTc ,Of -0nt .Ad j s n:e # `+� would now'�n lte a`"moti.c�n fob spproval, JUn, ing �;h'e prep'oscd density is wll within the G_oneral .plan designation -for the area: and finding further; 'The proposed' uses of the property will :not i i r BUTTU COUNT" PANNING COMMISSION M1N11TES January 27, 1977 �� � �x�,i�►z+rigaaH� Yu p, tr,aser�ly°tr�e,,Qa said G"•ot 4 l6e6tlef ► 9 ft, souttlerL1,y f.r-ki th fr'oM t'ht nQw h as, , carne,w of" �i d lot 4 w t oh.o' a. wes�ter1y, par let with ttie north lind� ref w� ', Lot 4 300 ft; theince :s.aothe�ly tt - ii,ght an.g'te 433.8 f't�; thence,'easicr�,v. at rJ`,o1gt" `dngte, Q0 ft. to he erste"it,v 1`i ne of u•i..,4ot4. thoa4' �' n0rt.i10r Y along SK Ing, . Y, 11*9 t-, t" the point a,f: a roni4,. td eastet toe. h.lh9 1.. ,`awes, more or test, Chico Ron tai pU Commissioner Watters raised a. poi�it of order concetAing tyle Commission's consideration Of this 4ralt environmentalimp•uot tepOrt. Uri MoKeeman explained that the old environmental guidollne� called for cimpact`ports b the 11Planning certification cation of the envi ronnlental are Commj.* action sshouldtbehin the naturt,lofla ili-commendation, the Com>lt�ission`'s 4 Mr. *4cK�Ooman 1�,ead, a . otter fr6M the C�licp Un fzed+Schdol, b�.str ct dated lid' nuary 20, 190 as follows "' ' Mr. Jay MtXeeman, Environmental CoovAinator Butte County Plajating Commission 7' CountY' C'oritetbrive �) Oroville, CA 95965 t5'a'�tl« Mrs 'b XL- einhhi.iRe:.'YShelt:on V.)to�.�:r3 76��48 The area indicatibd all the EhVir6nmenta1 Impact; Report fors john A* Shelton;, is ldcatcd itt the' one area where We' have aoncei , ..,about our abiiity to adequately house students in grades K through 6 -n the neighborhood Schools. This eroa is sewed'by shasta.•ai d 1jd!6rchoolsf wh*eh At, 'this tame are at capacityi` The problem of housitlg olementary students in the northern par Chico is going to be a problem for matiy years to come. The controlled gxowth in this section of town will cause the di tviet= to possltiv da .viiia of three things, or parts of all of them, ib the near future: I. Build addita.onal';•`faci).it,' es, whi.cli, at this time r�e do not feel we are capable of tloit g, 2. Change attendance boundaries log. schools: 3�'ranspert students out < ok thit dioa to; sc.haols U the central ;rf , BUTTB COUNTY PLANNING CgMMtc5-� ON MINUTE$ January 27 ,,,o 7 T on pages 41 & 42, ref3the Bette (aunty. R c, �#eor "'a on the south �� `�ck4r g1u�T�"6; �r�.d ori t � est by the vest line of the t '1/2 of the c T/2 of said ,Se'c 29. Containing 360 acres, more or less Air. mcleeman, called tho Cbmfit' ssi bn s at tendon to bt tnonts that had beon added tcb the environmontal' itrtphet, report particularly _ those from 'the °8tate Gloaringhouse' Proponents Irving Sch Taff 973M hast Avenue, Chico, did not feel significant» He commentedsites reported to be xri the .xea were atthe arch 6logical City , of Chaco h,g ,annexed that property nd that �waterat �°was, Availlable from wplfs. ac�� scent a . Opponents: John Schooling, Stilson Canyon Road, Chico, commented that although certain nearby property had been arneXed, to the Cityof Chico, it had not boon allowed to deVel.op, 'and that `this z'bning proposal would be leapit6gging. Himor lttexJn ,451 datedJsnua�cy�Zi, �,07,'dread the bu.0 f a 4-page , ' 9th Ave C hica to Neil ;McCabe, an attiorne.y. in Chico, requesting that Mr. Johnson's ,prap�erty "be eXcl.udecl from this proposal, The hearing was closed... Commissioner Smith commented that she felt thais was an instance where the General Plan sloes pilove to be i.r. agreement and fret there are other conditions that were pointed out in the M which do not, coincide ►with, the S-h as being ori appropriate tone: 'Site further stated that as 40ng as the esidences'have to he located onsept c 1.anks,:'it appears that only` the area that has :soil 'Which is_approA pir14to -which ,4t, pointod'.out ift the tlki4 -would 'fie ah appropriate area for 8 -K zoning,104that the gest of the areal where g0iigt are hot appropriate should not be developed until it can be ajine . to the City and attached to tho soot system Commissioner, Smith moved to recommend to ,the Board of Supervisors- denial Of the zone and that the, Commission► recommend the area be studied further formore appropriate zoning for different, areas as mentioned in the :hilt r w } BUTT13 COUNTY `PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTBS - January 27, 1977 in re ards rtr� t e� ,prorAsaon""of serviccs d, s.ovtic: t `"' jl -we,,.ie'x►bid tv" s+eharsle+: by Ci.ss,crietatt�exs am�i� jty#S':' Commissitinets Ci lbert, ,,.$m`ith, {Vatters and Chairman 1E anford NOBS: Cemonzind, Le Clorc, Moore and Watson ABSENT':, . Cemmiss tne�, Thobach �3. Robert Cl, Bryant - Rezone from Interim SR �-I Suburban " )0 Residential ` l acre parcel j �to :S-R (Sub�a.r`bih Resi" dential) far property located on the south side of Shasta Ave. appra,x, 1/4 mile west of esplanade, cores taininq 10 acres, more or less. Being located near Chico, identified as AP 44-052-02, more parrticularl,y described as AT of Lot 6 of the "Evans Tract'" per map recorded in the office of` the butte County Recorder in Map [look 3' at Page 61 rLawson read staf+ fi,ndings Propo,nonts : Robert Bryant, Route 5, Boit 90.6, W66, commeft ed that it was his plan .to make a 23-lot subdivision out of- this J �operty, aind that all utilities wore available and drainage was adequate, pponents No one. There was no cdtx 'e�spondence. The hearing was closed and motion made by Commissioner 'Watters seconded by Commissioner Smith, f07r denial finding that a+ction:'for approval. by the Commission Woull be inappropriate at this time when y this parcel but��a svrrounding area is �.n an a.nterim zone: not only y i AYESCommissl,oners Le dere, Smith, Watters andhailcman r ' , i•�ia�i�ord NOBS; Commissioner Came:nzind, Gilbert, Moore and Ndts r► t��,SBN'�' : Comms. s s inner T}i.ebach .''' tai"i' taas' in t'rUeted by C— buns.el,'' to i`orwdvad th'it muter to the Board o:C upervisoxs 'i{e'pri�t", . g r .. y .k . _ tbn:� ltt s act�.eri b the �bmm�.ss�ori. w 7�' BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Janusry 27, 1077 4. Cl_'tt' ' Wj.c, �" R zaifl+ rpt r� w � c, }pq /y' /r.r.• y 1j p �� Til - n r_ Pv44 " , u - , erc3 r property,", Odh ed on elle north side g Y PP P o� Olive 0.,0wamma tOx. 0.0 ft{ east sof .Wftxdr Blvd idenitaf t .ls 4 Q• �Z.j mor6 'part�.:c`a�%t7" y C�t»SG�"]�bLI as:3 d Commencing at the north 1/4 c&rner of Sec. 14 T! 914 Rot 14D]$& , thence east 103.8 ft; thence S 240 00 W 3.04.5$ ft. 'to the.. true 141.1 of beginning-, thence N 24;0 000 t 304,55 ft; thence, wastli�ne of Ol.ivehHighwayutthence5southwest - o the north right of erly along said aright*of-way's line 220 ft- thence N 200 47' W 489.02 it; thence N 120 59' E Sao ft, more or less to the true point of beginning. - . . �,..�. Conta3.ni'n,. � ,564 €acre°t, more,,,6,v 'less, ,Oxovill,e. Mr. Lawsoji :read staff findings. ,r Staff reported that a letter, had b66ii received from Mr., Wick asking for apostponeme-0 of this he`a.ri g. Al Appleman, 902 14th Street, Oroville, commonted that Mr, Wick had told him lie would be out of town this even:irig and' asked himl what pro- cedure he must followsto have the hearing continwod and that he had bion told to write ,a le'ttor to the Planning Gommiss�.on, Proorients 1�a: Opponents No one, Hearing no voice to the contrary, Chairman llanfoard continued this matter until. Vebrua:ry 29 Charal one P. Conn - E :�►zotae . from A-�2 CAgric � tr�ral-Resrdentaai� g "_ si,dential Mobile Rome for property i� t ,� AP -41H A (Agricultural 1�e located on the northwest ^cornet of V-6 Road `Lower Wyartdott-e Bond, identified as AP 36-022-09,0 conta°ming 2 X28 acres more or. less. >3eang located near Orova iie, more, particularly, described, as Got 5 in Block 220 as shown' on that certain. Map eftt t�er�0 '►Map o llil xa. Veran�t,..l3utte County, Cai.i., ornia' 0 w ;i.ch , Mjtip was fi�.ed �n the office cif the hecorcter of t o Gourity of gutee, �8e u , 4 t;, BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TM January 21, 1977 14i on "'a�i1#'}!'f. �O,c,�• EXUPTING TMEPROM that parcel of land Noun, jed and described as follows; 1 Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 5, in the centerline of the county road,- and running thence west on" the north boundary of said Lot .5, a distance of 569.6 £t. to the northwest corner thereof; thence south 00° 10' west, 658:7 ft~ to' the' dbuthwest corder of,skid Lot: 5; �:het�.ce south 896 "50d east On thesouth line of said"` 6t 5, ii2`lft. thence north .00°' 10' east 540.0 ft thence south .890 500 exist, 154:0 ft; thence north 1`6° 99"_ east 353.2`' ft. tb the point o'f' comneueemdht. Mr. Lawson read staff finda:ngs. Proponents: Charlene Conn, 4450` Lower 'Wyandotte Road; Orovi;ll�p stated that the requested zoo ttng was to enable her to havevher mother who is elderly to live'in a z9bil.e home on the Conn property. opponents: No one. -seconded by C oilimissed: and motion: made by ` 0 NJ- .1csioner Moore, The hearing was coo sioner Watson, to recommenl� approval finding p p ed xoni,ng 'is compatible with tl�e surrounding, area. that the• ro 'os. 4 missoners nenzind, Sy Watson ,Moore anti Chairman �Ianfoxd. Comma dil.b.ertt Caj kith,and Watters,) s NOES No one, ABSENT. Comntissi.onex Thebach, and Commissioner La C1oro who left the meeting at,recess'time. Motion carried. � AnANiIU�J�ISNT A Shad brook Sub;dxvsin' M. E. Sciar4na ' Pile 77µ42* Abandonment, of', tie .pjablic Utility easement aldng the y 's ion eastorly 1 feet 01 �,ot, 8 anhadybrook St�bdxvi y val o9et;his a'baftAonment and 41�sb 'tssioner r ,� mi ailbert seconded bj Com Sm th, to rocommenci appr- o Motion was made �`� n o recommend that �.n the :�uturo abandonment of the eas'emeft be acs r omp�.i�shed for gtjho� parce19, wit2 r� the ea�aement=-not lust an 1. isolated iparcei as., x,. this c�se'r. AYES ! Commissioners Gilbert, Moore, Smith, Watt;ers'?x` }- a,nd Chairman Na.riford. t .y BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMJ$SJON MINUTES - January 27, 1977 NOUS Comm ssioner CAmenzind. ryD�I y�,rr yy�yy aG .1 , . ad -6t h;Vie' n (iri arari out of the room Motion carried "i I . MISCP4L' LANEgiyg _ NUlRONMFI�'L a;IMAC'I'p4.it'Ts ». ilascus.siox. ;as. to 'holy, best to obtain necred iEornation-� porta cud ariy concerning economic ,inlpapt» , Ca}r.ma7l IfFhnomdas%ed. that, this natter be placedon, ,the agenda' ext a dater d�.te---at4 the time when 'the Cnintna,ssivn Brute Study, xov�ems 'the Central.. B. CENtAAl:, PLAN Stud rehensive F2'ev Y Comp � �.s 'oil _ Mr. Laumoli cdzdented that, in the immediate future offorts will be concentra ted the rectaon_ cif the 4 new ,elomF�nts ,off the Genera + o rev�isioja. plan roti x than ..oma r,apns xv He G. � �arrom�nded the Ghmivaio�" ray a y�: . „� y` hod cl in in Chico n��t week acd;etd thaLb SMonde the ''Summary_ of Goal and 'pd5di cies s 11ld ,he. r ,ady h 1 :�tt t o mo a are Paradise and noJ4 bung printed . . Co TP 60 (Timber Land P-resorv`e� z Sup erlri�s o'rs 'orie- -Refer+ed by: Board ott Mr. Lawson commantod that the -major issue at the Board hearing for this rezoning had been for usespetmitted and added that the Board had sent the proposal back to the Commissith for consider"at op of tooth Eying the ordinance, He further stated that the Board reavested that the la nquage contaic ed in the, �tta'te legislai:ion related to tomcat b16 -uses he used and that 'it wai; the Boar�d�s intent to allow hau�sinq of some type` and"remove the 3—acre' limitation on muting ''lames L L ooi,r` 0-ftVille, asked that thee;. following Str r I w �Oetttave the thr'e'e*acre tibi tation on imin, in4neo th , �r�W�i n+a. '� comrata,bl d �vith . t thber, 1 eat clearly states that mirtirtg �s BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING MOUTHS - Jaxiur ry 27, 1,977 4 Allow 61 least ner ciartell,.of sand assessedi which may be o'sed as a �Osi dente or otherwise. _ 30 Remove all . pA reel s under 160 etrts t6tea6ri calll y fromthe or di-tt h-ce, unless the proverty owner wl�a they retlucst in- clusion'' n clusio'can prove' ~that lie isabl: 'to cart%y on a, Gdmmercial`ly viable -l"ores t*qr �' o�. owin eratio" on the parcel 4� All lands, req rdless of size; ori which timber, mineral, andsurfs' t rights are 9b,0 rated' 611 or in cart, also to he 0/6mpt, from the control of the ordinance, Tht, follow-Ing persons suoported lir. Lenhoff's requestso in total or i o na rt. Al Appleman, 02 14th Street, Oroville, jai eso Hansen4 oroville, lkathryn Dolles, 140 Acacia Avenue* Oroville, and Ruben F,. Brack, 1629 Downing Avenue, Chico. Mr, compatlblerrusessewasnq the too vague. DiscussgorCouncil bl`lowod�lt the term The Commission requested th8-t staff carry. the fol l owi nd redomme'n&ed changes to the Guard: j MUMS pl }1T ITTED t (i) Compatible use Being any use whi,i:Al does net sig_ :c ficantl detract from the use of t%e property for, or, inhibit, growing and hatvesting timber, asci ,hall include, but not be limited to the f0110wing, unless specific wb`�l,d he cbntrsr }' x� a pocxc instance, such � use 1 to the preceditg defi i l BUTTE COUNTY PLANN l NA COMM i S 5I Q MINUTES - January 31 , 1077 Weetinp field in Veterans Hall Rradise, rAj 77•�+� A k 4y i kk I. PLEDGE Cf ALLECIAiNCB II. ROLL CALL., p°res'entz Commissioners Camelzjnd, Smith, !Matters;, and Oair,Man Flanfp'rd Absent: Commissitgners ni 1 hert Le Cl erc, .'loorei" iheba cha'nd Also Present; Jiro Lawson, Bettie Blair. Larry' Rrooks, and Bob Gaiser - County 11a„n1n0 hept�b Brad 5landi n - C1421-1 Hi 11 , $-Upervi sor Lemke, sand 'slim SkJ, e1stad Chico, Enter"pris'e Ile prd I 48RAL FLAN CLVJVITS, ANb TIS. PUBLIC, H�CA{tlh.IrS ON, NEIL G5 pP.Ar'1' ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT p Chairman Hanford asked members of tie audience coi+es of the drafts to pidk u p (507)' d which tither five eli,ments: were not herh Ed Falkenstein asked d enlaihed_ that.t,hes.e Bement discussed to, 10 Ghai-rman._.fi.a_nfar !yore the. s6jeet of the suit �y the CitV of. C,, co acid the ivtiterventi,bri by the Attorney General; Jim LaWson described all the reouired elements: Lawson ex0lained Government Code requirements for local general Ol ans, and that adoption of these four nets elements would complete the Butte ;County General Pharr 0. Bob Gainer presdhted the; h19too'.y' _oF state ,reouiramonts i'or these . elemen►.s and of the preparati an r {i l 1 i n 'ncto e C6U6t�1. iie' said ,the y had, hired the firm of ,Cli? Gut � ss {n be=t 'to devel!a � these C r ro elemonts, a,nd that reWation had d, taken loaner than hlianr�eds raise�y stated.. that this he rino was the first of four scheduleid Commission them at ubl i c heari nas n Rarch-� wa lai seri sal d •that a1:11� oftthp.sec�nsi der d of �uaory°�srtr� p r t '�t a ear n�js 6n-the elements The C�aar Y el't~rrQnts would affect 1-and u-fie, and 6niAa and the; proposed revision of the Ganeral P1an, ��ol) iaasaid that S0issmid Safety Wa tL a count wide concern since ti e +Cts+,• i formati an fai ser exnl ai ped', the orf 1°975 parthqua,ke and, that L'Hr4� Hill had undr vered a variety rdtt w Mary ort Ea.rthtlraake and 'Fault ,.r ty an,d said that of all ther fain is sli;,:+vn y on'l Y the Cl evil a� d Ni 11 east of Croville has shout" retertt mowdtn tit. Gainer said ;that the BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING, C,,OMMISSI(M � r MINUTES January Sl ; '► 977 a r; major seismic hazard in. the County was ground �hakiha from quakes both° instAo and autsi." e' the; 'Co u,nty« r �. 4.ry Gaisdr, read and eXlIaih,'ed th-a f„ndinas, nropo,sed polfaios, a'nd' implementation 'of thdr .Seismic SafetY Me'ment. Fd Falkenstein asked if Seismic hazards had been considered in the desi,ctn of Ornville dam, r iser"`reptied that they`ha.d� In<ansvier' to attothar questiljl by Mr. ralkenstein,Haiser stated that' there were no knot-in faults close to Magalia or Paradise reservoirs, (511) Brad Blaodfon descHbe'd the s'cane erf the ,`heces9ary aeolooic inuestioa- tions. raiser explained the dangers of linrtafaction during &' rthqu4kgs ` �. been c.onrsiaerdd- in ':on- struction of the new Paradise Iibra.;r. t.. d a 1 en:� te” n a.�ke'd '1'f seisrnrc �ha�a�rds h,ad' r 77-55 1-115 (and of side 1 77-55-2-000 Caise'r descried the Snecial Studies zone designated by the state alonci the Cleveland Hill fault and Miners Ranch Road, and explained that oeol 6ptc rendrts Waal d be roqui real for an',y de'vel o► mer t tn ` the. "zone: earthauAkes Was too spaecutatiVe to) serve 6n ab dssn Labe linty 0l.e cite Ca �eh� sta�t�d :that data�'� on � the rel a.ta on�sh r, � ��, forCo�un ,y laoIicids. (' 16s} rai ser presented the fi ndinns and Or000sal s of the Geo7100i'c Ha•w& section C`'` the. Safety Element. The potential for landslides and erosion is both hfohest in mountain areas with steep stone's and high ratnfal'ar. Ground subsi dunce isa poss:thil i t,y in Val ley areas of withdrawal of has, oil's` and Wat;dr, but nand has yet b#,6nobsdrved °in Butte County, GomMssionee Shah asked, wheed., DWR tqi putldedp �v611s; Caiser exp1a1 ed lithe proposal �AS'best lie c6,uVda. Chai'rma6Ha'nford`.askod'if�' it was poss4bld to-predict 9,091dtncd irti'°o STIR. for a. Pro Do's ed �vith draWA1 Comi issi drier Smith felt that 06{�'praposed cantrol s for larirdsl ides and erds'idn shaul"A 4e' more sOtacifi d, and asked 'if data,, ' from the recent soilovdgetation survey should.be used, Raiser said` that l aodsl fEle ; 06tential i n Paradf so was l ovr; but hi ph ' to the eatt "; (531 ��rith'tlran'ite'AsoI"fS1 and s,tdep° s'o'ilsHanford discu , Co�mrnissioner reas Nai ser said thaf , th,, highest e.a u'si on notenti'a.1 was i n mountain a Ssed the erosiou� 000bl6ms � r4tOl'tino from-t� t6 clearar"�oa. for''06eydrds in `. the Fbedst Atandh ardal� from "tfmber harve:5tirice, and other, h'uma'n actf0ti68, (a'isorrexpla,itied the proposed policfes an g6ologic haidrdt aO,d their i ndOPO �rAti on °'i°ntto Tand "ate pri ans w�, r BUTTE COONTY PLOMING "COMMISS10,14 MINUTES - danuary B1, '1077 u Caiser presented flap 111-4 and oxplained State 5ores`tryI's natura�4 fire h'axard classification system, based on mappingof slopes, tvq'e of vegetation`° and climate, Paradise has a naturall Y 'hi rah hazard, but was shownas "Hazard Varies with Vegetatlon pensit,j and Type"_ because the Veqe,.tation has been'so modified by urban development,'' Fd Falkenstein pointed out the possibility of afire starting in one of the canytMns and spreading into Paradise. ;hai man ,Hanford Olscussod �the � C(inco�w fire and the high natural hazard in Parand s,ej i` } Brad Blandin explained some of the relationships between fire+.h azards, development, and fire protection. raiser presented and explained the findings and proposals, The presentation focused" an definition of adequate fire. protection, structural Vs.. non-structural fire protection, a.nd local, state, and federal rosponsibilities. (end of 77-55-2-163) break 77-56-1-000 thru 140 is blank - did not push record button. 77-56-2 is also blank same rei\son? Findings roposals for Noise F1a`i. Presented An'd extol ai nod. - Members f the audience expressed col,ocerh aboutrnoiso�from traffic and motorcycles in Paradise, 77-57-1-000 Bob Oaisor "prosented the Scenic 'Niqhtwa,vs 5.1dment. Policies foots on control 1 tng drivel ops -t i n areas vi si bl a from rural hi ohways . " Ed Falkenstein ditcussba ,.aevelopment al and hent2-+laaal is Niohwa,y and asked about state designation of s:conic hlohways. (607) Chairman Hanford introdurod Warren Humbert and floe 0alken of the Paradise Municipal Advisory council and Supervisor Lemke; 'gob raiser asked people Ilighino complete drafts to sign a list, IV:. nbJOURNr1BN'r 11eeting ended 041 ) xxsi 11e :q. Ord irsnar� S1 , r� fx r i BUTTE CQUNTY 'PLANNING VIIIIISS101i4 MIN ITES,','- February , 1877 (Held in Chico in Citi; Cq;,;nci1 Chambers) 77 -59 -1 --,000 14 PLEDGE OF ALLErIA HCl II ROLL CALL. Pre.sentt Cor'Ir¢issio► ers ramen ind rail he rt. Smith, ThehdCh Nat tson, anti 1-1attor,s Absent Commis ,toners Le C7erc, looro, and I, C h a i rMa;i, Ilanford sent: Bob7Gai's" r. 7- canning Dept., Prad 81andin: A sr� Pre (' 1 c`hDi . H?" lfiill hichard Nilson 0 -o C'k"tw`'J lan`nino j nav 1101 - Cook 0, Assoc, Oack K'04111"ush, Charles Harv+-v;�j� Honest 5avane, novere n1.,ce, Barh#ra Corel rind, and ,lit+ I'li PLiBLIf' !! ' 7S n•+ r,r "� ��r"n1- A'Lt, ENvIPI0Ntt ',r'9hwlwb OEPC�T J 77-59-1-000 ;lob Cai ser presented the t11ese c;I,PMOhts, i ,e, , Stag requirements, extensi`nn, in iunctirn, lei ring a consul rant, nreparnti an hearing schedules, He then nresented the mans, findinas, and nolicies related to earths°uake faults, `around sllakiKd, the A lgvist-Priolty Special Studies Zones and the 'lictije-'actionpooh-htial (475) , grad 5landin discussed the notgiblc 14'•,Jacts' r"ZsultirI,d "rom imnlemon-F tation of the 'nolities nronosed in the SoisMic :Safet+r rlemeht and feasible alternatives, Jim flickelsoh aMted hove far back tlae �4rt�oua:i•e record vmint and hns- faults were located. q4Y flall asked for detail s on dosir-n: cl structures tra avnid dsmac, fron liquefaction. Bob.Saiser said 'we rear, r-n "tiir', oIjiikq l ayards irf 7,c„rtnelstor� Ca1ifornia1t by Pill nuyton t,f rhjtr,.�nt�,e t�toV,*ft,4 oarthouakes and d=Matte, ry, , --DU D .r ' �.Ul'TE 'COUNTY n�, N a N � �:0'�, �' � P x t1 1 I 5S 10N 1111NUTCS - Fe`bruary , 1 077 (726) Caiser pre"sen,te& pans; findirlas and n�o"lic.ies related t�n tho'oeclonic hazards of nrloun\l subsidence* erosion, landslides and oxraansive soils and the pos,si blre acts , ( 93 GO ar4d 51and'1n said that imol.ementation of prn�,osed policies motet increase development costs: ,f , Jack Kohl bush asked if around water pollution word included in this element: (Answer was no : ) Bob Gaiser explained the inanpino ofnatural 4ire hazard classes. He also:ex0laihed the findinos ool ciefi,.and imrrlementation pr°nnnserl this sub -el ehient. 77-59-1-151 end. 77-59-2-000 REb1S'S uradeSLribed codin mmonhty�+esthe �ofihoisesand comolainirssals of and co ton noise Element. H� � ., common noise sc;�lrces. rAck Ivey stated t1hat the best protection atra�inst noise gas tiistence and that alahtiOds and'bern)s wore only inini'mall,y effedtive. Commissioner Smith pointed out that sensitivity to noise varied frior,? person fS person Cpmmigsioner asked hour noise reg4latirens would be enforced. (495) Caiser discussed' the oroposed noise ordinance. Rich Gilson said' there's been very little problem with the City of Ch`ieo's noise ordinance because there have ,been very few tomnlaints (59 j$e-Sensitive use.• Co Ra, Hal asf�ed foto a defi rit ti on of tlo . yy r��ss�nner Watson said thet crowded neohi'e Orere MOrcfu,ntirtht. Rav L11a11 asked if poi ` cy -� coni"l i ct'ed with f i n'di no 5, rn ied that pbl i ci, did not enctouraae aoa'ruis "l is near railroads a, d h tihwa 5 but Juet reouire ihsltlat'1nn for anartmehts, f, a r BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Februarly 3, 1977 V Dick, Ivey said the mar1ket encour1ged anartments alonq hiahways and railroads where single --family hoses Mould not he built and sold. Honest Savage said that usino complaints won i'ndirator got noise problems is wrong because people don't co'tmsljdin b.ecti,use they don't know who to complain to, Gaiter said that, PublicIzina of this clement and a noise ordinance mi ah't lead to more noise complaints (7B5) r Gaiter said that the Scenic If1 �-;ma,ys element concerned something positive we wished to preserve rather than somethi nq we wished to avoid, such as natural: hazards,, fires noise. He then presented the findings and policies proposed in, Scenic Highways ele tient, (033 ,Chuck Harvey 'wondered if the element could include proposals for bicycle, pedestrian and equestrian trails. nick Ivey said that trails could be included in the circulation or land us� elements, R'ay Ha11 asked if local streets could be desio,nated as scenic hiahwa,yt, Gaiser said orilvate roads and 1oca1 streets were not appropriate candidates for desiq,nation, f -59-2-147 end ; 77-60-1-000' ' amm7 ssioner Camenzind felt that development c,.rntrol s art scenic rri dors i n aari cul tura1 area. mi dht restr1 c t 4nr1 cul turaI uses , Gainer replied that agricultUral accessory structures viould not he affected. (1091) Co;itmi ssi oner Watson felt that setback requirements, 5l1'au1 d be flexible errough to alloy development of properties., Ray Hall asked there wwr e any priorities or schedu`l inu on deli rEnation of t;cenic highways, (40ter said icliere would he no benefits. from 'elavinn �nsst�rte��n)'hut. that develt7�imont controls would probably ire initiated y for all S "6e it h�lph�,,a,ys. �a �1a11 asked if setbacks �rraul'ci be the same IV IMCVING A0,1Ot1RN'ED gal me.n MJTTE COUNTY NING COMMISSION IMINUT S February 100 1977 6, 0 '" .. ti6 y '` .1' rvp+i `h .., Y; y�J�! r M� a f "•i.i .y,�g,j, �) ,,r I. `PLbb0E OP ALMiGIANCP IT. ROLL CALIF; Present: Commission' e�'s Cornenzin�" lvlooxe �hobac�iy 8mitlij 11►etters ,'and .Cra rman; Hanford. Absent: Commissioners C Watson 'ilberti Le C7erc'and Also) PTO$ent: Jim Lawson, bet Siemson, ti a 1I1: APPROVAL. OF MINUTES Minute r -OV Jgn.unry 27, 1977 wore a p-rovect with,the follow,, Po , o iif,eottom, delete "iVatsong , IV, PUBLIC HtARIN'GS A REZONE Lt.*, • ET1. , - �Reone Pram 2 �0enerl Timber-„M�bunta nn ) to TM ,” 4�J acrd lots yLpS of i.ittle ,Chico Creek.';1%2 m3ye acs"t��oftSta e;ol�w"l'bo ` at ten mile housiC Pscribed as: A portion of $ectioot l and 1225 and 3.5 ,jf T 2 N R !E' M08 K 5e. �i�onq cti4ns ,0f T23N R SC 1aPt Sec,ti0hs 3'0 And 31` �o�,�'�1 2SN W MRS&M mare Particularly described :a theiSEirlarhertof NEido6ectiori• Section 1 T 22N, *92MDII&M Sotith to 1 also being they NEcorheh of Section! T2 1' 22iN RMthence Westerly along the wor`tEa ,1 ine of said Section 12 '1536.61 ft, thehce south•er'l the east line of said section 12 1347 S3 ,fit, tarallel Wkk,­"�,. .1 hence westerly pa.ral1el with the north I ine Of said �S�ection 1'�., 1294.4 ft., thence S680581 OS W 111'Si 56 ft-, then o � � � �" r Mr ft thence N 'al0 16 08 8- 666, thence lV29 25 d3 td' 1T11;6l ft, . rJ27 54 23 6. . 119906 ft; ° . ,'"thence n 2,Bn W 0 :.thehce NOS 47 20 W} 37 ;6$ ftp therlcc Pd60o 3 4 y +�, rt�g thence N3o 0' 1�'� 11:17 ftf thence northerly 256749, ft to s point on the north 1 ine of said section 1 located 413'74.64 ft; �we�terly of t!'1� rl>y corner of sasd,:ect'icyn 1' ;t -hence easterly to the SW cnr,ier of the $t MOMM; thence northeel 'of the 5tJ4 of Sec. 3 2'l�l it28 6ec t1 an• 36 to � on n tll�dect ��i 5t the ..west 1 1"'d of sold "� post .,�.er� if�e of 'safd Itotti, 35 thence fast to tiie center of50etion 65; thnc, ;l,bNth BUTTt COUNTY PLANNING COlri'!t38"'CN ntINU TP-5 February �O, 1'07 w easterly to the NE corner of said Section 36; thence northerly' f :! to the Ntj carnet of ,S e�ion '30 T ZU UE MOW; t,her�te ,,se;uth-. ,.r edsteriy to the , epi Ir-Of safid seetion 3b; theinte sc�othei' y t0 Of tion 31 T 23N it3E JID8&'M, thence south-Westerly to the nNtrc cornerof Section 1 T 22.N R2E, ADD,4tI and the, true point of 4egi nni ng<. Also: r Tb,,e, N'i, of the SM, and the $C,� of thq�t4' of Section 25 3N R 2 E "MOB&M, A All containing 1573, acres, more or less, northeast of Chico Mr. ILawson react stat: findings and added that this project batt received a. Negative Declaration Regarding ' nvironntonta.l Imput. Couhsol. Sllelmgn advised the C 0141418.,sion that it was p opax £d thw% to rack, action at this time since 1~iits is ommending action.. _ f, Lt. R . B, Cherry, 729 W 2nd" Avenin, Chico, commented that Die .5mal:l.est parcol. within this proposed district is 40 acres. !le stated that soils a'i'r . conducive to grazing ,and that there, would be; adverse consoquence8 if this area were developed duo to resultant pol lvtpi.on ,nf 'Li.tte Chico Creels, advetw%e tai con�seq'uehces end lie _" xy g - i` aid act �C11dt, this a.Tea i� served b a ��n"fie �Teli�c�"'� �bda� i�elt��iment lie felt' thi�� 'ptop�osa'l: was consistent with ' the levc�. bay 'dev presently existing. „ Lan �l3ays--, dr'.: � 280S$ Ess anarlo,' spb <6 In op o�� tions ° askbcl "that his pxapoxty be tlol eted and tacit an adcl�.tifona.l ' 2, S42 ae'r&5 616hg :Doo \, Ridge be i.ncl.u4e& In, thug ptopbunl' as,'TM-10,4, lt'.Iwaso*pl,ained �a��i Rzd that sudh a ptbposal. wou." ., `kavc to he a s6pa�. a.te action- -that 4t would e`giti e rn.nother a�p`I,xta.ti.bn. lle es=kora t is litb' erty ,b , DaIVt Ssn`tos (�1.7.$ 2G attest aisb' h2, doloted, but `."°pxeseiiftad ata ,0Vi,:6once of, agency.. t Jdh, , tdtgot. P. �0. Box :141Z), Chi to, pc.`l o ifs fAVoT off' the TM 40 and al;°°nIns.t' the doloti.on of Santos r ptope'rt�, Pd,ai 11el.aney asked that has propoxty "hie' dblotod .find .plaebd. ift 10 acre p4roolvs­,hity it is ptimo fbt de`.el.'opment to thw,tdots ity. It was. vev�oal°od khat a.pptuima.tel.�y $Ot 'OX th1S ,Prtposal. isr �i•oT land that i.s�,Undtr thw Wi ll ttIm"n Acts 1lA bay s y ..fit ' 0 Mile ECo e,: C}i3�ce � stated m that bor ers { bo, .;.h,t 1Clibt ung: it was under Ahe )NUlinnison, Act. ' B1.17"`!E COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MIN'UM February 10, 197 ,Tenet UarTiS,, ars: de h :u s a fe L n, :ver o� the ,� statim that those �'is a tale thing going, on up the re's that i�,.he lake is rod, and fish are dying. In rebuttal , ,Lt. Cherry commented,,,(that Mr, StAntos had been cited .-or,bu:lldozing across the creek and added that the Hayes parcel. ..actua:l.l,y in the Williamson Act and that Tri-:l0 °toning woul,&�"not: be consistent with that Act The .,,the del.e y fng tans closed and Commissioner Watters, ccm�mentiing that tion of Santos pr9pertyM � in the middle o , the piloposal - � would i`rustx:r,,te the whole purpose of the rezoning, made `h' motion to recommernu "apprbval, :-inding that a Negative Deelaratip"n'Re� garding tpviroynmenta.l Impact had b..Oen filod, that this proposal would protect the area and that it conforms to the General plan. His motion, was secoi,ded by Commissioner $mith; AYES: Commissioners Theba.ch , Smith, Watters aria Chairman Hanford- NOF181. Commissioners Camenzind and Moore. ABSENT., Commissioners Gill-ert, rye Cleve and Watson No action. th�sima.�texcChOSEAJttnt�l.itito1.truaryr`l7 ip�hops ions �-hantoxAd, ' conta.nued Hearing �' a es of having a full Com, mission, and staff was requested to ask the absent commissibners til listen othe pe concerning this hearn s o-that they would, be preparedtotote p .PtitZTG I-itAtt'INS ON THE G.EIV51:Ah PhAN. =11t-NT84 AND nRAPT ENVIRONMPMAL ,TWACT Rt-PORTS FOR TIMSh L;hhMLNTS 1. Li4ml.c Safe y.hWont The; summary of this element was briefly revietoed by Mr. Gaiser There was a Suggestion that a recommeftdation be made that no W, building permits be i ssuod tor` structure other than single family structures without a spcial goologita.l report, in the special studies Tones designated by the State, Commissioner Camontlftd commented there had been mention, of a -fence 4isioca.tiort 'i.nthe;�rtThevma.lito-,area. in a publication by the Bureauf Mines a.n,ff, asked 'teat this ihl±ornaflion be ifncl.udd -,; i.n the element. Commissioner Camehti�nd was asked to,�/lurni,sh the staft- with this 8U'rTti COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Mihlil` M5 - Del ruary 10, 1977 1A,formation in more detail. '2 �Safet lkeMan �. Mr. 'Ga'iser, x150 reviowed, the ww1t4rY of tbl ,'; 0,10mapt. anlnli `i4�no 5uaitl� S'r'L(t she -fejt the oc:at'.: o7T,'Ioff_tijq sexpoTta:C�e deposits sljou .d be Indicated in the element taw n t�xe. �Iiscussi i,zx x�gu��'ctingt tlf 4iTe J».zerd it w.�s not•ed, that t'ar Ali �;0 lia,� ?dire ha l rd -x — a.lror than, mos`rt of the baianco 1 '�a tiU�7r�is '; ' o that &Qwlty, but t,aka.t thoir, de re. Or to. pxt?`C� also high:er, , RE 9:26 p M 4BTiTING RECCNV°El`il~i 9:45 P 4 M. Noise t I oment,, 77.,61-.1-54' ii,. ,t�aiseai.so°brioCiy a" vie�a the summary of t1jis, Bob Frpide)%7uT'fi, 284# N1 -at i g oI�1 Av nljo;' ,Chi,s:o�ummaritp(lS a-Z'P4ge papor{ ,pro sent ed ,to_ the C.omnr sio)ters eotviier The,,to xtfoIl,p,lys j ,fI have,reviewed the Janna1 77 draft of the Noise Element for the Butte county General Plan. i consider, this draft a great improvement over the one that we , looked ,at previoilsly. I X do, still have ;some "con�orns that ire not differ ent :from those: O'\*essod oriO'1141y P e tr 2 ,para bra if Xoige Sellsitive Areas: I propose that in the list of those G0w. ideired noise sensitive s�.tes hpusi-: s both sikolo fatitily ;rind multiple, be, included. Nothing has a greater impact 'upon the quality of our dives than the home envi.ropmenx an which we and our, .famt lios span& pur time, T6 1. m. t thi.5 h6ige Sensxt'i.ve Jefi pion tO Sites 010t Wlttairi' ortly li rgdr' aggregations or, people than �'� ( nox ma.J:ly find in they pt�ivate homes does not seem reason- ... ,� abld. in 1~lto as of 111ult' l-Ctfa1y awl llhftgs, the aolgregatOof pb6VIe' .4- BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Vebtuary 10 1977 t: would fax• xceecl that alregdy listed asbeing noise sens,1Wve) a e, 15 per- sons. I am therefore requestingthat sin 1" ,. `' g e farm �yA Irl mat pl;o' fama l y" . ,dwellings be included as noise sensitive sates. Page 1V 21, 'toga paragra� � . s places in the draft the reference is made to dn 60 $ as rovidin a ere a �n other providing " suitable noise environment inside buildings.', ;gain, this Lan unit can be misleading since we usually refer to noise levels terriis , -I tincur, that this draft ..element has. been~ cons i stoat 111, usinr the, %, but this is not the level to which people will react in thoir homes; in them' yards, and on the street. jn, 1.972 the State Legislature passed aa, bill that Wicified a $0 0A levol that should net be exceeded in school classrooms, ,l.�brarir�s or multi-purpose rooms. This would seem to be a reasonable level for Dames, 1 thinly we mi).�t hi very cautious that we do, not delude people into thinking that the L(in 60 proposed in this draft will. in fact ensure a noise .level surficiently low to onsure, a good living envirorunent Page IVy25, Table T 46, iM _ if leinentixtiori No.. 3 IThe draft says, "support state and federal regulations for reducing transportation noised l propose that in addition to this statement another be added saying that "all law ofiforcoment agencies i4thin the county be instructed t6enforce 'the State eh e e`'Codd regulations Partin ant to vehicular noise both on and ofk"the highways." pie XV45, Table IV'46 The imp _ � and 4 or► tris page should each lemer�tat� arz section of items .� contain'a statement to the effect that no lancl,ill be zoned fear single or multiple divolling units in areas where the L level is predicted to dn exceed 55, ;An add tion4, paragr�-11 or 'section should be added to the element to the effect that Oy td'-t ,or buyer of airy livinL unit will be supplied with, information j'elative to the noiso level they cart expect anis. the', effect that this level, will: have on- the quality of life if the anticipated out-of"dooxs level tri the, 4re4 oXceeds Ldft M If you have questions relative to theso comments ploase get in tortc�y ,5w RUTTri COUNTY PLANNtNOCOMMISSION ; MINUTES w Fob uary 10, 1977 with ane. If I can provide any denionstrati6n of nog. e levels that would be b6.lPfq t to ,111 COMOI$sion or tib: Supervisors � ����� °eoltsac�Olt. ,t�� sN.�oise:: �. bo ploa.g0d to do ,r r. Very-trruly. you'z's, Rob rt L. Fxede> buxg Mx. Rredenb•urg later, reeomtnended that a noisy ordinanco be adopted ratber than. the adoption of suoh an ordinance ba,_ copsiderad. (see Rave 1). 5, TV.6 'Implementation Sceni.o Highway Blemen't 77-62-1- Mr. /7.62- -Mr.. raiser briefly reviewed t) summary oE, this element and added, in response' tiauihfroa, ane of the Coftjmjssj.o*,-rs- that p psScenic Highwayswere aJxeddy, paved with tho exception of tipper Skyway and the novthorn part of Quincy Road. No specific r,,econtmehdation$ were made V. MIS `ChLLANtOUS "Y # SUPtRVTSORS WITH REQLIRS'1' THAT A NEWrVh DECLARATION �.SFERRRU, BASK '�O''pL ANNINC COMKT$S1ON DY �,,� ARD OF 3p RIY,D 1: R'a.xtram Rezone - R1.1e 75-84 )jPtone f'r'om A-2 to -4 and 8W1 £o7r' S00 acres, store br, lo5s, located on the tees sale o psplanarlo,. between , Raton Road and Shasta Avenue $ Chico. 77-61-1-464 C6Un8e1 S:iemsen stated that the problem or the Ra° t -r A Reto�lIng was 'under study by, the hrtVI .onmental Coordi-nator and, tha.t , de - termination regard ; jm ng enva,raental impact All be made 'by the board of Supervigolog Tit -response to a quostion from COMM ,ssionor Ila ttersas to whether any xertuest had been made ofth6l Coordinator to ftle � a. Negative p�c�a'.r���ox�eR�t�s�d ��s Environmentalci��ai�ct' it was stated that as indicated do the a eAda, mx.nut e i4strotted a"'tion `6 if BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTUS February 1.0 0 1977 Cin mx a un « F� ttli ofi`CI then ma C�#C1 1�f11 G�il� � , 4 ;a t� ' J.t matter would again be in ftont of the Commission on s m0 atd'o�:erm�.nate date, No a:ctxota was taken REVIEW OF REAL Pj�0PV,4-tTY .CQUxszT CCN PURSUANT TO CODE SECTION 05407 for AP 35-115�05 _ AP 3S--116.02 AP 35-102-•0 t! AP 35-46.43.0 77-62-1-630 stat -1 presented a brief resume o:� the proposed uses for these parcels and General Plan designations wore 'noted. Motion was then made by Commissioner Natters, seconded by Commissioner Moore, -to find these- proposes uses ift eon�ormity with the Butte County General Plan. A:YPS s Commissioners Camenzind Moore, 5mith,0 Thebach, Watters and Chairman Minford NOES No one, ABStNT Cominissioner-, Gilbert, be Clere and 11dtson. Motioncarried. V1. ADJOUNWNT The meeting was adjourned. at 10:50 P4 M. Taffies 77-60-1-504 2-710y0 malfunctlolled 61-1-003 y 1 - 1 µ 0 0 V jy�J2 -Al I4Y Priscilla Hahford, la.i...rtlan i .74 11UT` M COUNTY I' I,ANN tNG C;O;\I,NI[SS i ON NIXNI)TES 140brlxa ry ,17, 1977 ate f�..a,. v) 'i H 0 G 2 OF ALLUiXANCE; I r RQLL CALL: Prosent CorrrmissiOners CamclIZ i 111) Gilbert, Moore, Thebacit, Watters, V,,tt;,-on and Cha:i;rman, kCdn ord. Absent: COMI'llssioners Le Clerc and Smith AIso Pros,ent-p Jim, Lawson, Del.; Siems rli, Bob Gaiser, Larry BrookSL J i l Stej of start ChjCo Etjter- prise Record) Jay McKooartan. and, Hazel Dallas III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes for January 31, February s ani' 1eb,.ruary :10, 1977 were approved. as mailed, ;t V. PUBLIC HEARINGS CONTINUED FROM MFebruary __-1 0: 77-62-f-'729 . Lt . R. to Cherry, e t a l Rezone from Aw . _ (General) to TNI-110 (T;,imbev Mountain, 4,0"acre parcels) property_ low.o i along both s .ides of 'Little Cli.l,eo Creek I/Z Mile oast ;o C State HWY. 32, at ten mile house (GEAR CNG CLOSED) Corttmi.ssioner, Gilbert repr�rted that lie listened to the tape for last weekfs Meeting concerning this :item. Commissioner W tiers n16ti.ngtl.tat a Negative Declaration Regarding Envirohmental Impact had been filed on January 11, 1977 made a motion to recommend approval: lindi,ngthis Proposal, would protoct the area and that it conforms to tite Genera. Plan. His motion Iva; .secoftded by Chai mar, Manford AYS.�t Commissioners Gilbert) Tl obacch? Watson, Watters am Chairman. Ran-ford, NOES : Commissioners Came nzind and MO.Ore. ABSENT: Crirrm-i donors to Clore and Smith. Motion c r r i,e d BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING C04M IS$ XON MINU`xES - February 17, 1371 B. PUBLIC ffl'AIIARGr 01 1'��I; GIINE:WkL PLAxr I:I� fitI�NTS A!`!I� lJltAP"[` I�NV'TitcINMEN`I` L [P'1C`I` I�I'��ORTS FOR `IRUSL 'ELEMEN'TS 77„62.. 2,.824 " Mr. Lawson said that a request NO come ,rout Chairman Bern.arA Rii:hter �"T contl.nuancc of aotlon to the, o.� Pebruary�, in view of the :Cast that D. meeting was to he held liy,-` Ch�►irtitan Ri,Cltte2 Sttpezv�so.r Lemke and 8.Lll Geddis b�:tween. .,now and then. Some, of the Co6issioncrs questioned the irregu.l car ity of this procedure, Commissioner Gilbert mado a niot�on to continue dIScttssaon on this matter un1 1eYar�xy 24, 1077. Elis moric�n viaseconced by Catitmi.s� sion.ev Moore AYES ; Cotnmissa,onexs c ` Catnenzind, Gilbert, Moore, and Watson, ,r Commissionerxheb ch, `Watt Ors aria (h �.> NOES: "s ` nirm�.zt t�Ia.atkor'd, ABSENT :' Commissioners to Clerc Lnd Smith Notaotl failed Chairman Hanford commented that it seetnod logical to fol.locv regular procedures and asked. Enr comments :Cron, Mr. Gaisor, e He stated that he 'haA recexired °Yo) new recommourlations Tho; t ol'iowing action was taken rega-rding rec6i1amendatins_ for adoption ot the new elemonts of the General Plan: SUivIMARY 'TABLE 11-1-881, ._.SF1IT11Y Ii1vENMENT motion was made iby Comttliss40her Vfa.tters, seconded by Commiss_ioneT Theba,ch, to recommend adoption with change as noted on. Page 3 0� these minutes,. AYh5,l Comm`, ss .onex`s Camenza nct, Gilbert, Iooxe, y xhPi�ach, Watsony Natters and.. Chairman Ha.nEord,� I0,8S t No ine ABSENT:COMA'isslotlars hd Cierc an0, Sm th Motion carried} F. (� f NA,`GE$ 1W,Nt� -4LAfVNING' Com t�I�S'I:0.� FE.ftY Ta b lfit , r: MSMXC SA '>2m l uMl rrl't` f H`tNT�INCH to. 1,MP LEM8,NTAT 101 1. nut:t•e County is in an area or known 1, Tjoror,n tap pab.lic et curtent 1. Approve and publiah thig plan rulul.ts and rocelYt. seismic activity6 a0-bsM'IU n° ox' a ism3C hdznrd ars el.cment. Kecip the information 411 p4j is of the Count UP- to"t9itto. Z, Tho only known active fault 3n 2. rl,kra I1sty nf~rraunt ,x11. krtairri Zp. t<cndir]okf the made reaettt, infoe- BuLto County 4,6 blio C-leVoland aalcoric Inforinatlop .+'n nmaklny mo bion On selsmic hazard in all it,i,l,l. (atilt near rlrpyille. A ntl bar ' 14114 u#0 d0*1416na. Avoid zoninri acid subdivision dcclsiona. ok rautt�s Ili or n0'Ar the ;county 1ocabing 'gohoc�r„ horp3Coltr, pub1 i C bul l d1 nos Should he consi-derod pal;etttiull,y drtd r.Itn idt stabs J11 ltnvwn eAtllt , Active. The preaxi.itiity or- the Can ar41[a Andretan Gault system is generally Diortr.r,'icant ill evaluating suistnia risk i►a the oaunty. ..r'' t, f ItOriuir[7 Appropriate dr'ta .lets Il seizitiic .inveohigat:ons tri 43.1 t public and private projebts in �a o locations Of known so.t. auric risk. '1+1 c: €tr�+a axc�tttgcl he trl[aVeXntsa Itil,l � rdilolo ehfr tse.11CJL,r ohd gzlf:arld 3. I tc�rcid t alspk0V,& attthc,:Jtjx wi>1� fault 1110 been adsignated as a alae- as earll,lshod ba the SL-ata Mining' tIespct t to All read: estate deve- rival, St,trrlies Zone Under the Alt_{uist+-, atitl rfdalagy pemrd' within tho l.opmont sand s'troctores fair huntan t bolts Act1 dfIrettive January 1 r 1971, ,Gpegl41 rtudzes genie, occul-ninny within the Special (Chat t.er 7.51 Olvl xion z► C�y].i'rotnia p Studioa Zone, as ed by provided cost:.) State law, d. Portions, of thc.> LSaCrahlento Valley d. Cohsldor-iiquothotkuh potrantiai h. ttoquire appropriate design of 1, have a e)ctt'crally high petential 111L tnaktrl land u.nsic3clrslotsa. " atrttatures datscf3ptla]tr to the do' 131„ setattion duritlri a na3ot: effects a� iiquefattion.a � earthquake. uW M 1 r 1 ['t bl a X r-1 . G1:OLOGIC HAZn17b, $UM-Z4oBb1CN2' I'INt)INCS POLIC't; it4PLlsP9�:Ny„M ATION 1. Tho identification 69 go.:tlogic 1. Inform the public: r,,P pe+�. dy1c 1. rtp)sr:oVe and Ptitblisli the hazard ltazrtrds is in the publics' in- hrizarda. mmu in th. s plan element. .steep > e re t� ! i•,u 3 nCrt>~tritcion up to date. Oaoloq�a hazat:dg limit Nand 24 cdns.idor geologic �aaa'rdp In 2.: for high netermiho nppkoPriai o tl�vele�tnenw cariabilit.iel a dvVae opmGnt df Canc1 ,,Uact, uses hatard Areas, x s ltouslrg; Circ►t1ati.ana r;orteor* on the donoity and*p'e of devU- vaf:lon acid Open Sptico G nmonts. ,!,opmenh permitted .inhigh ha%ord �ti>ae�tti, 3. Th(-, Mink Oii landslides ie consider .land'slldo potentlal in 3 "nequiro invcstigatibn Of landslide groatout in areas with revlery of privaba development. Potential 'tot: p'toposod development. aalopr"s Over 15'x, wook rook, and public fp5oillitlids In areaa Prabant tintlings in nitvironmentat and Jitqh rdintal.t, rated 4 and 5 on Msip rxr-lj review and subdivision revitW H �1. Tha j�omovil o surf ace 4. conslder drealon pokobbl'al ,tri 1terlUia a investigation df erosion 1-1 rrxl�crri:.l by mitt and water reviety of private davalopmdnt Ot:cnti4l for t,r:aposod dovtrlopmrn't. Lr) 1 virion by n1ope, soil, and public Cacillt es in oras nosont findings it),onvirotimantal r vegetat;iOn, precipitation rated high and very high on review 'and sUbdivision review. �y !b and development. it a� ltap XXX-,,2,.�j groaLeat in areas of tlr4nitic rook. all Ground surfaceo dop n.i.nit , ►1q `5. Protoct against; subnidonde5i Monitor sinking its necEsaar Cglli l-e ©H cau;�o E;Lgnificant damage in .Clam grcund-•water withdrawal I1V St )C Mxa )OX subaidohdd potential reaa Where there is exp 1 ani ell and ga, wSthdr Withdrawal. �1 Pati view Of Pzopoded wiUidr awals. { k-e nn.i"v+ withilrrtwal o>' round; Of P1 Lnent findinot 1h elly' ron-� ,.,. �rter, oil and as, ,.e _ m htal �eVieW, 6a. bIan i valley areA8 with Glut ! l 6 prutoct development 3n valleg 6i � tlollibor, shrinking,and iwelli,ng and WdlmiLigation ra, � J scsilt, have a _high potential 9ri)as with r.xponslvd aolld. hs necesearinkiny. e ror at;t.uotrura,l damage ftohimeasures £ttr lar, c# developments wail rfriri.nking and swtrliin5i aitd major fatalities when tharo 'high + W is a potentiAl tot damago. .=r r w � , . � TT1� Map 4, Delete s„ pp ia�.� legend hazard l;i �„ and des3 naE•�ano, at'a ase. Ind3ca,:e pa adise ash h r r ange �.m.. on ex4lb a h'pitl,r7 .rr,r»�. L�'TTtt7 lil!'�l1ti�'' St)lt�>;A1;,�1iuN�' :, rxtvrxtat3s rai,xr�r: xMt�:lakliar ,x�timlohl 1. Mont of thr County hd'sifi{; i. MLUral, fire hazard of rrah'o iixc�br�a kt6tt Ezrm flto li,xna�tcls ai cry.n��dfixpti.r�tt in 1. Consider fire hax, ran in ali:l land It lcmtm modoeaLo ,evority;. all rt�ann.iny, roqu,iato.ry, uao rand zoning decia;ions, � ehvixat�mollial review, sub- Nklarly all of tits roothil�j Anil tnF.)UnUtlit aroma have hamar s of high or extrnttto i and oap.ital .improva7mutit prOgtatms, irit;lt st;ttd.ial Condor" i<nr axra.'r of "high" and divisioiy ravlow and tha~ vision Of ,Public oorV cco tMt+.y�1�°7��'y�. irQXtC fll,o Jntt" hc'Ir.rird, Thct rhilttlit3r 0k cares 6cCUv7:a:nGi33 2. inoronsi.ne al,ottg with the �� Provide adouaw .rir'D prd- 2. ldnntUy proaeht and 1;uturl3 ino eoijinq nwilbors 0'r visitors trotlon sorwliiat ata 41- stress' OC pdpalu tl on grototh aria 1110ita Or adequate Lire pror- tocytion ael:vices at anal zeaicir+►tg in thb Cdunty, racreartiars watts cicgw anarlclpdevQlaimtonsdfit a; rothrdti xanflrpt viewgl ... processes 1-t H H 3; ltesidcot-L,l doyclopment is 34 oar urrinel irr tho mountainous r,lmlt devejopmont where natural tlkd hatakds aro rirgh d> oxC`r mo 3, Zone high ;and extrertn natural fire: haz treat; rrr tho CouhLy what;tr bwh�+o . 'Jhkl 4dOquhte fJre protdchl'�yn j*da rl1reas which art ihadoquotoly pxotr -bd for ktitthzar xLtcmr mid !s pratr3.tlod low rersidetiti4l densities Only ,: a fir( ptoLeoti.nn i°»t:il.it tea l rrovide no new public taciilliea_ that: encouralja growth in Otago go are difr>xul.tyto peouideiaoLa rtcl } areas except those cssontial to r� prubl c as sty. O H 4" Wyotatidh it the critidal1: 9: iac,kor in Eire pr+dad. ,, ,i tlsQ tuolbraked stoney Lha 4y Ilequiro tUnlbzeakn where 0416 cif dev6lop3hq 43rOaia d... 1n hiyf," "oxbrtarne"r .itdaible within 'rhitihaland 0 anJ fFire h�xara area, e 4 tr..nor' fire iltlzatd, area InfON:e u`I a�nhs on Vecl!iyaot1 elerar Vire pradtGw�ti+ n cilitia:s S. prdVldo adogiaate Eike a►ace ara•and structures . 5r 00odetudt caro htatioi5a , p,; are lacking or marginal in � g• Some Great of the county. x pr+7taot3an 1n p31 a:eas where eriilcC larvtsls pa'e doi#a teat. as r«tlurod to protact eroan of greatbob need Promote the formation of vol'untee ,tire t oomvhniea in rural db'u lni los. i Cf0VC1otsmeht PA rhFiervoiz Ga wtat�:railoda loads to Cirea 4#nit devaaia meht' h n t7�ir iSif�crt�i,edub �� rrep ' Ye o»1t1g plans fat critical `tt.r,Ct) reaten tsusint,hity s�at.er,�h�itl areatp. Con»i.�or poattii�la tlatnttrlda tb, waterahed Iii environ- wwhatr✓rl »upPl r.s" fient5l r.�vieW. • " i Hanle �.. , Tttn SIA i, tib r~S� M-N'r (continuoa) Pira at)tltriol anL, auppraesian 7. rnsura that watt�r suppilos ` 7C_ prsVel+ p irtx pxot coon sLd" , ards for irldivid ►al and comt�tunity W€4te> is Afton restricted by for tidw d6vei.opment arc maoviatti fair firs prvtesctian byaLy 0ne� t1eW development. lnadaguato water supplies. - t these, Appl�j these- ntanf ei ds tO dub- 1' p 7rpoaer; s divisabns> land diirisiohs, and 1 use permito« Q, A t;ss to iwr s ay.. marghnoy 9. Gnsuro that road arouss fail Is adol"At6 C3a beVelop standards for widthok grades, and thrive rtiff hew roads to Ltiuitttnen is atiai� aiimitied by ; nadequato road j now dovolopmont for f4ro ptotoctton nurnosus, paXmik p�tstiagd eitid Iruhbuvez�inq or emergency vehicles J �,l Requiro mkAlL � 151e access Where ,fefitl.itlr: t 1^ 9, Fire roporh and reapo-.1se times 9ti rtoolke ar prUmoto ttio easy 9. DoVdiap and inipiembOt acOii- aisLeht streat namin�l ttnu Itousot i bre Often c�+aiayed by incon� d'oricialloics ilcantiFicytiun 6L� street: an;: devalopod pro,p,trtien. li mberin s s4edt g. y 60 i H sisLanoias°•arid it, atrcat Paining Arid house Cc►unLy. psyste equirefor nvisibtird l' " numbers t o b t ntimbaa".ng• ,N t,> 1p. SC,ril� t mnn sei.ivl.ties �ttid 1p+ h��gu3ata as necossaty those 10 hold hea>'ings to ariapl� the tlnifo.rm i`ire Code or U,,odi- uJ 7 ail uses have a high sine} fires, �tmergi .x:t41vttiQs sand osoo )ritl a 11fili Ciro pote�ntittl e fiaationo thereof, �merc�e. on i h ncy evatluoti 1 � . �q Provide cd`tr ua�e puha i i~ 11 '. Gnnsi der const'ructi on of o mountain aroast is often road evacuatioh routes in additional public: road" for. mounl;�in areas. i�vat:uation routes in mountain r t( ioados0stOm,a'i�mi�ed y , _ areas, ,.. Or t l 7 Q. i I�'��/I�i��Irid�iiiir�.��iG■.�i. -', . r� . '� �." h I ' If .. i + " ^ 1, `�,•' T�h� � • XV-� Nar�r 1;L�MIN7t f' 1~rNpxNr;6 r�.:,Yc�t rM��ir:>;11NFr�x��r�N iw Objectionable noise fan? trans- pwrt tion fa(.ili, icy `- " i NaIntain an d000ptab"I" ;;-15e ani +t' stationary ..ous✓c� oil have a v,Cion�c�rit id all � rcr�s ,a� ttTa Court XOiriCi3�rl;yag,,►Xt[tliliyiC?1aS�iC�f�(t?tllZillrlQ (LAR X s,irinii'icant imp�.tct a;i public t i1i�'t�4)�iEc t�fi�Sr�rJ(3i k�6 i2( ��o t�oalttr and wirxfare. � � cQun�, nnis P y e ordinance. 2, :tcin►e aspects of trant�portation- Consider � noise 10VOIs in enyiron- related noiso can be controlled 2, Wham pnatibla cunh:ro,l the wourcau !. l mental rev(bVI. � i(Xh abte and vaderal regu-• by the county, r�,f tr4rta�rart4t3nh natso Ltl maint4.tTs accetrtAble 40vals, latiani� for 1. transportation �oi►ai'odttt;ing toir-01 d ACIer noise in tltc lbca- design of County roads, Locate°airdrdt-L• flight pathr3 away 3. from developed aroas whero ,feasible, Devulripmont Alongrailroad and '�highways cancausea signi- 3. nentpand 3: Consider n0140 started in revlow ficant noise rablcm p othar�nolad-sons,taddri• C-1va 4t Uvl,blds near r,9,iltdfids And of zoning and subdivi#ion ptoposals. highways, Locate noiso 40nsi'tive. odes awes from railroads and hi h'way. a 9 UI A. govelopmerit near aircraft flight atlas aub Cct� People to ob ec - A. Paan for-airport davLl0pnie796 �. ri Locate noicQ��scrnsit � agcy H bionyble noise andpt:l roater► future And adtiviitttr rn 5rnat,rpts tasih va away from airports. Propor para ,tpecifi o airport optrations Purport t-;nvirons plants for Chico S'` i ts,.�trte types :of x�creaticnal attivitits maka ob. ectionable 5: Cdntt radreatr�n atltivittog 5. and OYoville .airports; Place limits oft the levels J r►oiee. that Ha►+e the pdtknt,�al to ceruse ab�ectitrn4bla Eia.lsa, of a mpli,fied mound and the time and ;' location Ok outdoor contorts, auto and motgrc Jio racegk and similar noisy activiti4go rHC cdlegislation J"ta e legislat on requires .linsulation c> multi- 6r Providd 62 dU nO.iss araand 411 majar, bevolop uU 413 noise contours dwoeJ.iins constructed 4dtt`C3gkft'tiy around major sources where thin Within tht 0 d3 noise exposure ihformation is bol prasently. [-� it4 contours available. r , G7 + bau8d�lpiobldma cross `b3,ty 7x Cod�dx,rte Idlth i,cdrperated 7. Uchango noire contour rotor- ritin4 to rash?,the a M otual malas prohlams6 inatiOn, novelop compatible t noise control programs: H $ Pis the county, groVa ;Ind at ti vita"bo Change, the :neige the 0614+ xnincht aurlorit witl chxfigiiiq C`dnd,#tldhs. 1 l�r�nitorl chnt r es in noia lt:vels: date, i►virorrmerit will also charigo. t1 p noise contour data. I�'��/I�i��Irid�iiiir�.��iG■.�i. buln't COUNTY PLANNING CONNTSSION MINU`>U.81 ebrtary 17 T 9 7 7 Silikii~iLu, L `C",+ mji 1. 1 8CTiN1Ca i.,iI(il•iIV Y hl Et—It N l�lo.t 6,11ji us air, d:� 'by Cbm4ls:;"toner Ott�T;�, �eeonclvr� �v C�mm����iahet"�� 12 and l of tltescr �..:�niate ti ; �< Pages iitieba�,h, t;o x'errotrur�<,xtC, �urlo adoption ��v�.th. change.,; as noted on AYES; Commi.ss loner:; C;.i7.bert, Moore, Watson,V�`atte s anr�. Cliairmart Hanford' NOES Commis loners Camenzlnd and xhebacli AM.EN".!': Comynisslaner8 Le Clerc and Smithx Mot:ioia carried; 7763-2-79' Mrs Kay Whitney, 740 Bidwell Drive, Chico, expressed grave concern about, the apparent inability of local residents to *�robect the scenic Bidwell Avenue, from Nord to the Sacramento 1�iver , and asked if some consideration could be ,given to making this part of the Scen`4c Highway System, It was suggested that perhaps this area should be considered ror a Re!'*Ource I Conservation zone, with the comment, that se�reral 'members of the Commiss`:on agreed that this area did certainly, have scenic, beaaty thdt should be preserved. II wxJ.y „ p Tablai' v-1. SCrINIC trxt tiWAX OLMON?P P UDAGa C)Y�zC 1MZ�L1'snik2tV'i'111'TOPt 1, ButAO County has many ar;oas of 1. Protect valuable saalllc areae, 1 bovol;op a bybtem of acenic hig o,:si der "' xioGsar>r5ciuc� natural landscaped. fos' enjbym000 by rosldents #1n,d irltUrs. ways,. ars ndica,te'd on hma V=1. mdditiona1 d0siOnatgon of local S�FloC ce liY'1.1t ppen ix 2. ,. � � r�1.t:i�.i.al. 80t a designation of 2. "ocsare official st.at.e daslg-� 2, [�a �.ow pa;taeoduresn n Appendix C, p n, scenic highways banoflto the nation of�acorlic l;.tghW4a local bcenio hici"hwaya program a(joptdd itA this 010ient, and roquiroo varloub County all or Some #►etir�n;;, Consider 3. ,ccnit 4orrido): bow-daries 3o' bollnodte scanlc corrltfoti a J. )()6YYVW OLa4o ciitoxia, Survey [should lAcl,ide axoas vis ible With cardt'ul cdt;afderaticn dounitK rorxi lea b. ", Solicit from highwayd, outstanding, of: all :factors: cii:izon participa, Lori. Prepare natural oz mmh-mado f6atureso '"scenic highway nepo'rt" fox each land whero deveiopmantr M41Y cor irlor. aftoot views, and feasible regu'latp'-Y ardata, A. Davalntat+arnt• or sr;eriic highway 4. consida.r ixuallty of visual C Require P ahning Commission anouaII l rights-of-way h'as bignifioant .landscaper and drivlrly ox- review of itajor roadj prtajectd to a impact c►i quality of visual, perlooaLl In design of the ino udo c:oncorn for scenic valuet. , landsuape :'anti driving roadway arid, ether-featurds ~ oxporicnco, It) the "Ight-of way. s F` 5. Numsarous vehicle aoodss Points 5. cbntrbl access to sceralc: r. Utilize oxisting aot:oss %Moto along uconio hignways can impact highwayx be ma.intalh safety fdasible. Litmti.t• enloro:achtii0it c�7 r~►_, driver $atetV and comfort,and uality of drtvinq permits for Ipa2eLy, and roadside' beauty.xperla�tr.o, G. The Aogativo visual impaot of 6. bocato and d6siyn utility . 6.. hoviow the loddtion and dedign M-1 Tit ility lifter and sttuoturda oti'rnetura" to ininiinisse of mdJor. transmiasioi'1 Bates➢ can " gatod by incon- i visual impart: ltociuire the 1.,aot conspicuousspice ous Sit ng and pleasing iarahikin of ciistisibution litaos, desibnnni ,i as feasible and wh6rr'e, thoxo ib c reabonabld choice. wes , H t4 'l. VroQwLion o>< sgonie corridoru 7a. ptotdct 4yain4t dovalopmont lia6 Limit unn aet3dary commorolAl brrel io lar tel.v develAriiib all that .is i#tcpmp;ef;lbla with u3a ndxo eta local land Ube r .plat•ionrs, the nr,tuka,l appLiarancn of aread, olariiy uses permit � �cnnic E;br.rld;�rd, prrjv�bit,t•Id of 5 -fit �ry�1�. bi binult tha ddnslty atmd l ooUoh b. ttoquirts lt►ege 1' t .7 ea per tlw�all.i.ng strl,cfvr edd In scphic edrrldbrbu Unit,. hotiuire ;i.ncruat d irtant set- bavkb i l nnoUrhge integrattldt oramptict pq i but#inotio Wtd4d, heno (.1 Aw2 areas, ti 7'.cn1a Vrv,l.' b`Gt�i�'c'. lix(�liSi11'l r: CaI:Mtw.'Nri' (Cv►�tin�tt'd) ,., , r ttosvlot: locat,.ten, Oub,j00 and Include n'arJn �`cstritl�ions �tt S�i� dur, r. f nt n+n rtcojic . "One. t?kopttrc+ dramlat;irhon&ive sign ,'ctr.ri dorfr orctinancn tit:?t st�caaitl laaav,islons znr t3cyrnu h�ctf►t'�ays,, i ' d Cdhtrkot oarCit-mavdn� pd �C3oti'a in acolniu COrC ilt`Xtt. d. RetJtai> r tabs p0rmit for private csarth- mating tlp13ratlohn in 90011 C!b13'�C1fi�y liequiro ra-plantInri and lan4scapinq „ wli� a f'eanible c� � or Voye- novitiate Clio k���tnVa,t OfLa.'t�ln n, � w tz rv.l�!ttaf-�ul:ti ttt ftt t~orric ! t -lan in a„or et rid o�r>+ U s. :nfarce fire hazard con- nt:"l.ct.1.+ itt t ntrcttin "tt�r�i�,i�losra. RaquitO AISG �,)QrMi.t for si.tr` Clea,:- ataca in ac enla corritlQrtti r { Ei. 0P't,i�:Ia State dr.'aq tla� ion of Y'G`5��,i.�CB dtt� 6. pry lra a" rat iftr, r1 at. . � '� 11.1` iPr a?zrh ` Oil t� Surv*t'y CC1rz,tQCt1"t1+ N prapar� anr.1 at�etiah l,i ,ttsrlY atatt ta, t�nnincJ ofd �aati3:c oakt {atP � lath use roquJ.aL•iaras:, i�lnn dovcl,�i>W ��''.' .rt�c,!nit; carr+�'i.doxn, pubiioffaciliLiestvrtY and tithtar All c.l;l`(%taivc 5t en t hi.tthtaays active ft'VOlvemt+r,�t partic.tpatlon In Hid 9: Indicate routes on Public ttrapa and, a and but5porka.ltaon sceriio tt,fyhtr� s Program, Place ��oppY" sighs Can �tdeiLoti ' xnul:ofs��lah!�. 4hvouvaaa advar- .� tiSing by Chambers of Ccttnmdrea And bthoro, $000 uit,ixen part - dbiltiOn in all aspooq " Of procIrami y r -t 04 CJ C3 �5 tai w1 i� Titi`i`"aH COb MY PLAWNG GatIrr,IISS* TON MINUTES - February 17i 3977 M13RIA RU .0NVCN.W 10 D12 PA 77.04.1-360 ` 4 Chairman Hub lva , onnerYcShoptaff and the consultants for they We job in 1 Utt ung together the 4 new elements. lL1L BUTT' COUNTY ATUDY - D s us s l on Dr TXCiLISCON OP mCnNDMIC T.aAIA IX ENV 111'AiE, REPO 77-64-IMS ,. Larry Brooks gave ir brief TWA if the "Commura ty x1a`:vvl.opunt Politics, it `C;c�ntr a, �,aatt a� t;aaaatrty�r�, ,.�al�'I�s r�;i" Mob ,h had lien �i V;. tr3�La. t6d. to thy memo era of the Pl.add, sawe wvoks alb., Following ra short di\' aqc tsar on, C ommi5�'inner Wa�.tters n6t.ed �txae c;oa sidoa"kalal.� Mao o the daa,t:�a prc�'��,ci���d ;i,�'a _t.ho Central Hotta St udv as l�aaring h;'jp:r-U In tae proper e;+aaloation A And use data nncl tiade tia Moti�aaa to reca Mona 10 the Ward of Supervisors the dove'lop— meet of a Uniform drat" bas for the Wire; butte County he unaes- t,a k"ei . al.on'j4 the sa me Wes as tate Central jutte County Study, uith spec! a1 gVaht monies gal dalied for, as sand t,�liei:' vpv feasible, and y�� i urtber that the Board f Supervisors adopt; service area; standards 'or aail.'' gar raxs off' ' the COMY Y that YS�oulJ mate calculations of : a:�a°vi & arca4tysorasa}a��1.c), not .}i�p�yayt these ry°e�e{rimmettat{yie�js ;q�.���yayrwaade in the hon {:lf �� l• 1�,1.�a •: 1'J lA 1.5+4 Co4i5.J� 7F 1r"M 4L payers, �'k✓J. i`t lx�ilx J,�aa x�1,+. to +w-A. i4 h4 oa7atnssxoat Wes of lae excellent a�na{k olao;aatt i'naaa7ty Pl onni.ng staff as e�eomTal � Wd in. than Butte Qo"nt;�" 5�t aa���"-K p art, l �• ul arl y that of Larry Pr'c�oW is o°rion was seccan0vd' by C:eartnl�;lionel` TAW&& ' �,�.T.S: i4 t�t��� s aaaaci t�laa��a aaa:an l-1�:rat'r�a°s1, � Wore, ' � r°.�: ,a � '' �caa� }a 1YPit �3+ aaa a Tae �[''f��7...iaa " a � i�r�r`t. fit` KY�'�' TWOS, 1 S ClLC and ARK il ' PlJI"TB Ct ' NI"t PLANI INO GOti1MIS8 ONC M1.14l: TJ',S Pobruary 17, 1971 �',c 'V i.Irz ti S;(yCIAL I'VENT �' 7a Sc ts: a �'� It was tagreed 11at tate p -.i eosent ly constituted -planning, Commis: ss r would hold a soc '' J.1 event, I)TObably on P �wa,day, March 1.;1 , at a place to be date; riaL�dd at a .i - t;ex k b. RBS10ATI ON Or LAM BROOXS Ob.Airma4 Hanfordanti ounced that Larry- Brooks had tendeved his ro-519na.t oli to return to the UniversitY' of Chico to fuxthor his _ er�.ucata,on, 1r .6aiilmous accl-a.im stuff' was a' struct:c,d to Prepare a lett"r 1. of ca.n►mciiclat�.otj for My:� . Brooks, . r. SETBACK AREAS IN URBAN ARtA,S' r Conunissioner Camanzind made the suggestion that ilie "Coa�ntission - recommend. to +;.axe Board, that setback reguia ions a3) urban areas (.1 . the county shoot d be changed. to conform to those required I "' t ue neat=hyr cities for commercial zones). V1 ADJOUPNMENT There being Bio kutther buslness the meetiflg tga.s adj OUxnod at `;'-o : 55 1*, rxscilfa Han 'rd,, (ha' apt "SAP ': 77-62.2_72 2 -All 64-1-931 t ,i ti �1 T UTTB COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION „ MJN�17,,'8S - Fc�brwgry 24, 1977 ROLL CALF: Present: Commissioners Camenzind, Oilbert, Mooro, Smith$ `lhebach, Wat,ters,a,h'atson, and �1 Chairman 14anford 0sent: Commissioner Le Cl.err. Also Present: Bettye Blair, Mac Parker, Del Slemsen, Jim Skjelstad (Chico 8nterpri,se Record) and 14aze„l 'Dallas TIT. Approval of Minutes for February 17, 1977 !; M'inOltes approved as submitted IV. R11I3LIG HEARINGS A. REZONE (Cootinued from 1/27/77 '> to C�-1 Light Comhierclal ) propertyulocatedRonithe. l ) I. Otto Wick Rezone from A R �. n n e r 1 north tide of 0100 Highway approx. 3C1t� ft easttaf Ward Blvd,,, identided as AP 34-20�-02,, Oore particolarl`y desceibead as Commencing "6t the north 04 corner of Soc . 14 TI 9N RjAE �Ibg&M; thence east 103 ,,I ftp; thence S 246 00' 11, 304:55 `ft. to the true point of be fnnilF,o; thence N 24 00' E 204 55 ft.; 41 73 f� ,i the thence eas�. . nce south 881.97 ft-, to the north' righto.of-wa,V line �i Olive �tii�hWay; thence southwesterly ;�ionrr said right- ' o f �-WaY lineo920 ft,6 thence 4 .200 47' W 482 ,02 ft'o thence N 12 39 R 300 ft. more or 1es's to the true point of beginnifg, Containing 5464 acres, more or lets, 0r6vf1le.' 77-64-1.990+.34 �9rs.. $1ai�' read y letter i'rom the appl ctitit requesting that Iii$ � pp`lrcation be withdrawn from cons eration since h;, -does ilib, l.a-n Ito ►proceed with the pro j eft A�, maty ort was made 'by Commissior:er 6 il.bert socobUe& by 4ommi siii once Go recommenddenial of this application, witl'ut projudice, o t. AYh Comm iss xonel s Camenzind �. , . 3 Gilbert, M6o),4e, ���SJJJith, `rbc:Jac'h, Watson Wattors and Chairman 14en.. 0Yd l r. i u t�.1� BUTTS COUNTY PLANNING COMIMIS,.IOtti1 MINUTES Pobvaary 14, 1.9?7 NOBS : Nt �)ne �) � ABSENTCtamtna.ssionar C31 ;lotion carr' cad.„ B . A p p A ! �),;_. " G�,� '' Alf'�;Ia�r iC1li NS'7 N) E Ny 1. J �� h it p B r a n� a r1 a V a r 3',tt ita �: o r� e a r ,ya vi,dl .s a t1b u �i. ►s i allt��rt an wr�'i nst t0 be constvw!i ted at'OttI�'rc+p�e����;�' 7 � ne on �,rc��ert;y �t ned ���-R I,l1� titul tur+a� rN�a � 1la1) located ren tr a yti. rb s l di3 of 501 Stiea't -- w wpff51t . 266 south of Shasta AViihw, a id,dot, t'i'L,d as AP, '414.',251014 t)wpv'11 e= - 77-64_2-127 Proponents., John Braml..,;tg c, i805 5t)t StT ogst;, Orovil,7.e;, stathat : lie needed the mvnin to bouso the anti gee,, curs that .hr, 1:es,t:101,0d,as a ha�by. He sa int that to- lal�aoe ,the atvnitig in-j;ot.�Ier loga.t jon. on the lot would hiaider )1is abxL�ty to tuxre ati���ia,nd on kw7e`ba�tIi 1)wrtaoit, of the r-operty, 14o' later d6 mtetlteri t.h�it' he wwaid bo �:cfr�:4s��l tib �.ON't, the areo. if this :*atiattgc we'te not: gta't 64 Opnohents : No one,, Correspondencet None T}10 hearing was closed and Cutnmi ssionor Ci.lbe v7 staffedthe it, �ciairi stances that, must he present for the hoard or Colkdsst.o-h,, ttV►�, z, the necessaxy „findings'' when granting, a variance Co'rrtirtas{, �atie� Nbove, commented that h: )lad been Ooe of those voting kjni'i1' a 01, 8 measure'at the 1loard h,.r ' Zoning Adjustr'mont, and made a drp>>ry t�1e a.Ppeal, O� kt ing'4tha.w he we.s �rlaabio to tttake tllz > cG� ,;sar'Y fin4iirjg;8 for approvo i. The motion was ,;Ocoftded by �Ccmm'ssione ;Cii1'.iv.rt:. A'YhS t Gilbort- Mooto) Smith; Wilttets _aild ' �r chai r'm n Hanford, Commassior � NOb'S .ers Cameo ine:t, i lhntrar~h a,ind Watson �._' ` enc �I�SBNT Commissioner Le. C1. Mbtio,h t±a.rr Led, The t(ppli.car,t w;is appraised off: tiye appeal pdriod. , 1ell f17 i^ ^.f _' 1 i .i_ ;, p... `; f,i II III i ' 1 i Ii I II . I I- I )' i 1l1 I`�f „ �' Oi tl I' II I J1 i i ' q7 l!iilhr�i 4 �{ f f i i 1J Ii14_r4 �e�l� �x`I 1 j� d��+1���11:h �wl Mil'r�l'114i�,AJaV� } �. ,: r:: Mil r� it V U J'J;i,S V etb « ra;� r,''i It f r V. MIANDOWNTINT Ii' ►� f, I �I J "�._,4 .��'II , I... `yI r�I�fff 1II �1 I ;: ►11 altll�,,<��4 Ihli l �► Ip! v7ic+nrnerrier zl:lixl,!a.I( 'W ,a�� I_�}, ,:'�.'�• l}iI l.. I II i.`ikki 11,vs z p �:f1.11a ;� � I,� ulb i 4 l ty IM s +b"m oil "t; ;�;)'" 64,.,1*68£J` 1, lir. ,t . J, r a r c,otllnm clrl,i; e~ to t 'b wt 1; h e ;R I�: vlr sloe b 1'�� t t, OT s 1.;h oa J" c 'r`crm tl�t public ult,�,J,a:'t;V 1�oafi (arT;:Grt"I's s'I:a1��r"f 1"hatt; lt: ,wa;s nen' l.i`»rt istr i>e+w't1er�, lhv Comm5:.(i`o1rr. 'BL,iB7un 0rl4p,ra„,Sf:xed 'c�0"7.(�tw.i';fr1. Llror't I o1l) (511 c- „i.+e�'h,,ht ' 7 E1.ndbred.Tard"r roilt��d ia Com}��` i- , thaLa Oihs 1St 11s Je1rh 7 ��ngtm1ss or+ that U�,il.:lty 1;Ixmlt4�xr3.e haciipd n�,s �I POT,tion oa t o �t44117'er eAt T.,14frponents R Noll.g} I 1.01 ion ivas' made. �, Com C4lberr;',p s}ecohclec� Colrrm ss•;'',Ohpr I Br1t:t1�, to x'cr6whirend. tha.'I� Iti�as rpt+a.a�.etinim,rilt bre -lipPrtf�a�o�'I., f',i;rt;d,�nl;; ina�ct :rc:t nest~ :y ani of°� .e sin�d ,khat tiyo: 1'a.t�� ee, a l`.ii;° f ctnm;�i,fiifls,ha:vOl been contactee,l t n:a avid, 111 aj;r a�mpalt e a ;rtirn rnar3t� thi; illcto�ino,,tic atibr., that the Vjhollt,: eas: rmonf: not belt, ig rx �t�dC��-+char at :least . ids, la,rgeslt 8Og#,,ent--be" u ndoneO.--ra th ,h thin 1061timK; at r:;rtl.y rale dolt int 'a tlino,. A)'i?u; Co�ttrriiIttsic�nt`irs�f, �w•1 a�tso i, i.�bta,rt, Moore, 8rm:iithg Thccti, Wa t te,),rs> , and ('111tairmiitn Har fiord », �r Cww141!a5,ger (,amen%ind, wbo- statad that he feit the I tuholc hora.;ld have beon 'zonti.dered,, i ADOW Cot ma s;� a oner Lei C:l,c .: e 1140ta, O l cavtaloe,. 2b Ababdoo the following described county high���y 0' t I' t'he CbUnty of Butte. Ease Eleventh Auenua from and includinrJ the e �trnEast l'tlAvenuetb' theeat�sideofthe Eastspanade aVive Road, Ea6't Ll,,ndo Avenue from west side of ILaburha,r� Avenue to the East Esala'nAde br ive Road Arid `i°nel �dI r�a the ;fast Espl.vnac',e G1Fij1e Goad to the h"olrth ,'de of 'Cl-ist 51r,4611th Avenue SubJect 6 easements ,issued to tho railroad acid +'I util i ty companies I I _ I IIS ,� CClb1MISST7N l3U'1 rt- COUNTY 1`i,A�lt INQ MINUES - February 24, 1977 .-814 �177�-b4 �� I Mrs. $l4 uconditions�Fan��.ntas recommended by t�, Department ofl,�ublical9oxksasfollows:aban Dedication; of 20 -foot drainage easement to County 'within th0, portion of Oleander Averrue abando ,ed recent`�y 2 Easemrnt for exist ig drainage facilities on ti Esplanade give, 3. Rights of the p,ublwc utilities in accordance Wath ectioii 959,1 of the Streets & Highways Coder 4. Access for bank maintenance ale ::�, Lin.do Channel, g a S. Pos'si.ble hiking and bike path. , , °_ `� s also concern that this Saban -Ionmc`ht Mould z,esult She said wa There, in a; land -locked parcel adjoining this property. con,mi ss .ones Smith questinneri the advisabil Lty of ha.vi,ng public access for emergency vehicles„ Robert Aarig 7 Jay mane, Chico, stated that formal agreement had been dravni 'up with Ioe Vanella, owner of the above mentioned 'parcel, to trade; easements with him which, Mould make for a safer operation for his above -ground gasoline storage huciness. Mr. Anna, said that lie had gist) 'Made recommendations that no left turn off Espl.ana,�ie i,n an. easterly direction be allowed in this area: and that o 1►#trl; ng, be alinwed On t-splana.de Service Road. In resp,►nse to a que80.6n , from. Mr. Parker concorni7,g the easement requested b his depai"1.meiit as to whether th is was a ')lanket reservation for access, he said that lie gues�ied it was . This item was continued for two iiedks ri order to give De part- mens of Public Works time to review the speciki,c details of the agr6e- ment with Nit, Vaf ella and, the resorvations for easment, and to ; 1 01riiely traffic Circulation for emergency vt3hi.1 1-1.es , (65-1-2151 V MISCELLANEOUS, A BOARD ar SUPMVtsoas' RtFE'RAAL s4:tjoy, LatUSe Maj to cohsider znnitiq t. '54 1I2 ali�dame A4,3 or dthe?t ompatibl a xohi h4, for pr+bpl_rt�v oh the Wast side of 5gpjdn44e we`gt of exittihpi 111tthi'm SR -j rano► BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COM"41SISION MINUT1iS - February G , 19 7 Chai, pian flatford commented that the i.` been well known, el3ngs of the Commission had _ Cammissionor Suri z sad d. that she telt that the net+►' commission sll:nu].d be made aware that the previous recommendations of this commissi:an had been ignored, th atrstaff carry tothen newoc:ommisSlollcommentsttheh0 contrary, reauo:sted old recommendations for rezoning this area as made by this commission months ago, and that this be foriv rded to �I:hem COX, their meoting of March 24; VIT. NON AGENDA ITEMS (11-217) . PLANNING COMMISSION TO AMEND GENIRAL PLAN 1Jiroct quote from Board of Supervisors, Minutes: On motion of Supervisor Moseleyy seconded by c,upervisor ]fad,igail and, u animou'ly carried, the Planning Commission oras recommended to amend. the Genera. Plan to t,tat i, that 'e ground is more inten�;,ive �l tile ha n G}1al.eve�. jePlan, use �tht�ft �1,1a��d use could be a,ntet� retied ti t;o tlje use of 'the ].alzd ..«,r, , Mrs. Blair coa'tme7lt.ecl', haat: sn ttz�sug:zt this r+eC'-:ft.genydat on firom a + , { .k + �j .. �r the he gr wa number of xncansa_stencx+es in the G thet a ,yin brought a rererlt rezoning, l�,c.ar�,n enearal plan. s as result o the re��.t Aftbr some discussion It was agxe�;'d that this metter, shbuld be passed on to the new CjDmm. ss 3 on w, tla ' the recommenda't'ion that th;r's. 4 ' xanil5t:d ctaange clese.Tv6s careful c.ontlderation tJith particular tonsid'erat:ion and Ct��Uuent,s from counsel. �3 BUTTE CRUX CANYON REZONE The fol1aw3.ng letter +gas reed; Idt.0, Ca 1.0 rib, 10'77 ' is Outtl co"ah*.f I7i11'i+ . t C71�1.;,11a:1air1 7 Co:rnty C�r?`1tr::,r L3r.i�i ���rllFi+!'l�Il�f�rr�lleia.rwi..y= ` ...,. ._. 4 __ • Al t BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION +, M1NUTtS V��bruaty 24, 1977 4 ne� :nn xCoti*tlscl�S1 Ma Zoning Comt- itt,� .,a Of t h 3uttE- Creek Canyon Coxxl2ni.t'v A:ssociati ion hereby a, quests t3�at th+� butte Couhty �1 anrii h oin ►issz;arx wnit� ate = ootna.11 2 zoni,ng : or those pott io,s of icctions '! 7,18, :and 19, 7,'22.`\:, I23.E, tit va���b�:a :�seridi�;r�.;, � lying bs�ke,�n tlzn f ,,��sta.n �u ��eC��'rkiu�bugx�.oadbon ed (1.077) ii ti c- on. the east, and tixe cet r -L +i 7~his act-iorc- ass ret;uested in ordet to complete t'he ,rezonir151; of Butte deek CAnyon without the nf-*ed for a. separate eoxtral poti.tion'ox:.t sis lA ea of app.ro .i mately160 'acres Thi, ct;.on is v;th the ftxll; knO'wledge and cohct�rrrares of-' the PULnning Commissioner for ,his- ares., 'rs P ra',sIlC-9 Maxi-oral,; anci the, su,pn, MvisoY, r;r. Robert Letnpke. Any questio —1) cohaerning this matter may be directed tb tor. uzm Lawson, pl.aP:ning Director, or memabers, of Zoning Committee listed below We- date ti'edatf` i► a Sin—rox'y, Charlds heyl Zoning- +^>oxn„ ittee ButtC Creek CAiiyon Cormmuftlty Aszodiation 345-4823 goboxt 8peer 345-129 Stevenof stex ler 143-8957 Chairman lah:Coro, tommen4ec the groin: :dor their ext,raord3.t ary amount Of work which hod beon done Pay particular attention to the request as contained the hely Commission It as the reeommendati.on of the Commission thl a.t 9 necln ttisottoa Or the inclusion I'Or ;rezoning of tho area bLAtwe�exi. the existing t0tte Creek strod'm, bod � 19"l) on tate east, and the conte lane of Humbug Poach on the west, ri t i. DUTT)'' COUNTY Pig ]�NID�►3 COMT1iSSl�gA1 WlIN UTES Februgry 2.4 r 1977 co�LZONB' FQ1t a'1'Y,LES PROPL1i,TY F?k,a 7��- �1 �1l � 1�� � n respOn,se to a r�t�r�s ,�,on beim Commissioner. CartenzaLnd 1`Ggarding , hearing on an Ianviti^+ant` ,''nta.l ;Cmpact R,4poxt far vrl�icJr Caal;ima ssY.onex»s had rr,�oeived drafts, Mrs 1ir stated that `�hi,s was, preslc edul.ed p7�i,or to the time of r,Ao rh�ngo 1n handling envrirc�ninent;a review pxocedu o , and that, ,the CommisSi.on woe d not hear this item unzlev pi^esexit xegulati.ot, { DV Farewell. Social Bvent for Commissioners xt was stated that pl:a.ns for a party were being formulated=w'to be held at Do "Lanc(;yIs in Chico and that' reservations had been made for a xoom to hold approximately Fqpeople+ More on this later, 77 1-94Z - TY uollowing resolution of commendation for Larry Brooks was rear by Chairman Hanford; RESOLUTION - PLANNING COMMxSSION county of butte, state of cal iforni.a Resolution of Commendation to Larry Brooks 1NHER'EAS, Larrey BRoo'ks has served as a member of the staff, of the Planning ,Department from December 4, 1971 to February 25, 1977; and WHERBAS>Larry Brooks has exhibited on all occasions the highest degree of expertato in the, execution of his autiesr. and W1.1MA81 Larry Erooks has enabled the Commission to more effectively ; a, perform its dutiesnd tiff effective- perform he is s, man of rare intelligence, integrity and wisdom, and his contribution as a member of the staff of the Planning Department has been substantial ane of great value to Butte County.y NOSY ,TMPORR t Dt IT RES( —tt) THAT THE BUTTE COUNTY PLNNINC CONiMI55IgYt tikes recognition of s'',expresses its app r"Ociation for the service of Larry Brooks. V:o the Co lnty of Butte and the Commissioners, STaff Members, And r;ttoclateg extend sincere appreciation and commend Larry troo�t for his o,etvict to the Butte County Planning Commission: Motion was maclo' by C6%missi,nher WatteTs - seconded by Commissioner Thebach that this reiol,ution be spre-ad on the