HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES & AGENDAS 11-4-76 -- 12-16-76n
BUTTE COUNTY PLtiNNING COMMISSION
MINUTES w November 4, 197E
4..t
77 rt,r7; +wY w ,:K�r v y ,r.;�. i w s C;�S �'1 h ,f . ' ' •�'" 'J`. �i.B _ r t ,.
ti 1�
I. rLCDGC OF Al LEGzANCE
Il. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Camenzitbd, Gilbert, Moore,,
Smith, Watson, Thebach, batters and
Chaff rman Hanford
Absent: Commissioner to C1er,c
Also Present:,
son; Bob Gaiter, J,o,hn Mendonsa,
Al Toussaint, Del Siemseo, Jim Skjelstad=-
Enterprise Record, and Haiel Dallas
ZIT. APPROVAL OF MINUTES'
.- lowing' corre,tior
t,
Minutes were approved with
2 ,1 1..., Pae 14 ,
g .Cominss'anWatters requested 'Shat
the minutes ref foct the alarm ho a dressed
''to secrecy being used
in using students to oto work ook the ,.Elements of the General Plan.
h6aetng for Uttl' ck°(F� re. 77c19)i bC�ia'irntatttlOned the clo,it�g of the
2 '
di sctassi on on °!i y i to � W Hanford suggested th`a`t
+ m ba- held unti'1 t'h.e matter is reached a�n' the .
agenda,
40�r 28, 1 Pa oe, 5, 11 th line from: .e bottom --change "Thebach"
to."6flbert"._
IV. CDNTINU5D ITit MS
A. REZONE
1.
0 t t o Wick - ? etohi from "A -R11 (Agri ctiltural4os.idential)
to ►'C 1" (.Li hh+ ' omlmercial ) property located on the north
side df. ,U1 i ve Hwy.approx. 300ft, east',of Ward 0l vd.
identified as AP 34-20-02
77-32.42-429.,
Commisrionor Oilbert o1prossed concern about the clo-sinq of,th.e h arinr,
on November 21 oegardin+l thi item. Counsel. stated that there was no
`, requirement .to ei 00 redden .ho hearing o desire, or readverti se but that the
Commission �s free to, do either if they'so
Commissioner Gilbert that under the confusing circumstancos surrounding
recent mining proposals that he telt this should be eeadvertised, lie,
then Made a motion that thi'-s rezoning be'readvertised and that notices
l{
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CU.MMI t01
_MINUTES - 14ovember 4,97
be'10nt to ,a.4a1ni>n poF1ert� o `toners Flis' hto�:
'f �.,. Comm'ssioner I r s,� '01P?
AYES. Commissioners Gamenzind, Gilbert, oorey Thebach> Smith,
Wats�on.i -,Watters and,C.hairm,an H°anf Mrd.
NOES'; No one.
ABSENT: Commissioner ,Le I-,erc,: .
Motion. cart^i ed.
r
B. APPEAL OF E14111AONMENTAL REVIEW COMt4ITTE:E,I-s D STON
THAT ENVIfIANF ,iTAL IMPACT REP RT IS, REQUIREO
i
1. Crestwood Subdivisions Unit fl, 58 lots, eawt si=de of
Earley :Gt., nt,r .h ref tto.sito Way, DroViI'le.., Uwndo^6
IGre.g' Vtst„ick, Rnginodr: Graves, G-e.d`di�s � �Pris`do11
77-33-i -756
Mr.'hawsor� stated °that a check list was ot' used, for t�hi's'.1�►rojec,t, �but
t
hat -the C p.mm'i t t e e rrra,d e the ' f o°1.1' o cJ,i ri`g f1 d i n-gs ; j
filnd�ri that due to the e,normsit ed on this ,pro�ec,
An Environmental Impact 'Report should be prepay i
environmental irnhacts could_ be ani:icfhe ptt �e'ct, s7gnif�cat: adverse
gated. The report should be pre:
pared for reasons of public disclosure due public interest in the
area, Also notihq the projec`t could generat significant amounts
of traffic which could affect ai r � rual i ty
gill Geddi5, engineer foto the appt'
icants, stated that fall ameni''ties were
>resent, that the property is almost devoid of vegetation and teas
ideally suited for developments He added that lthis wat planneo for
a� phased.development from south to` n�drt61
8t-l"l P K. �Commissiond'r La Cl,erc .arrived and: was seated.
Commissioner Moore, rade a motion to, uphold the E6vironmental Review
Committee's decision that an environmental lmpac report lie prepared,
finding that the project will have a sig►lifican-t environmental impact.
Elis n1otfon was seconded' by .Commis'sf-oner Smi t11.
AYES,, Cot�t�i�ssit►�er� C���en�z�ind, f�� lbert, �Modre" Smi: th; :Watson;
Thebach, Wa.tters,' and Chad rman ;Hanforid
N0C «' tdo one a
A84C'NT 1, No one r
y
BUTTE COUNTYPLANNIN''-:COMMISSION
MINUTES - November 4•�" 157C'
H+ HFjOING UN '.'�n''Y�;'RC. BTAL ncPACT IMPORT
r
�. ►r g
�. • Dan �ayst eta.. - Rezone from it���„
" ►' (Ari c�tl tura,l t 5 acre rr ��� (Li kut; 'rnilugtr a�.
p;arcelsi� ' Q (p b °t Quasi-Public}t and
nsB—a a (Suburban Residenti,a1$ 1 acre t parosl a ),,,,and fkoth "5It*-� it
Residential) -tore parcels) to P {� ipubl a a�n�i_r .t,`!,s � (Suburban
locateri o i'tha Bast side of Ctlhaeset Road : .* �"'� pr-opsrty
more partiaula;arly dasoribe�,,,, as; r forth 'b,f Fat°n Roadt Chicot
7
a,nd �,ofe �53 8_ tl rqu ii 12t:".21; thxough 28t 3 thtO h
' t Portion
thrs? ug 5 6 off' Ai �.fsll 17 '� 44,
No Bco oz� p , e 6 17th S4b Per Map o#' Record in
p 7 e8. 7 :of they Buttts C°tsxtt .�
Of, 5 o r Recorder lace ueci zaoarth
y .�pivra ;Cx�agk
daaori ftPePti g araaefrom that Porti-6n lona
ted Within the fo1lo�in•
t
w071!'R 9 nt7i. �
ng, at the inter, Of the aQ�ttarlines ot, Fatoh Road
ara-Vohasset Road; thence 4"88155r 111 , Z 40:01 fti.to the trujj
Point of` bogi:nyang of' the herein desoxibad parcel; thanco N 00°
58' �jL4"' pi 2844.80 ftr j theme N 88° 55,r "r E 2 07 ft: ; thflritza
,S 320 381 26t; E; 26 1, � o
c t 4- y 70 �, , thanoe S 57 211 34" V4 x134.51 ft.
thdzat S $� 55 13 fir, 747.91 ` : to the true POint of beginning.
Containing 600 acres, mare br less.
•
A 5 •, .t ' s+ 4 1t RIMY
t
The ` IV- of tho ,7 an tea of the 5.of 1 etc: 2 mg t" Ell
r,
'ce ti tho�frctn
h.:
� e naxo
tharl 2d Vit. t the `Ct� of
-
r, said Saco 2t the westOrly 340 ft• of said, Sera» 2 avAd 'that Portionloc
ated within the tollo%n* rte described, aroa
A"rrt , Con lonci h# at the sa�tth�vest' 't�c�rrior of �at��
thence 9-880-5
r tp�ttoE, �rtABB�i,
rdaso3 F 40.01 ft. to the true
��
cL t'ha heralh ribad arae] • them; ° + �+ heg3nxiing
ntr� s 12 . $'S 26 " ,� - Oo 54 '% 5304
w7407 rt t� 6 � 5 tt., thonoe °r 55+ 15rt ct
t ib true pejl of bedfihirtg� � t
gont�Linirlg, 220: O 4`c� r. eo, lore tit 10.9a. 0.9a. 4 T
. V4:r r. + } • ..
�`t�a 4festorl,� 2frbm
r0 ft. cif' Seoxcepti,ng the the 'northerly 20 ;R o said Sc�c.' 21 a,nd also
that portion �ocatod within the following do'! .ra,t�e3
P�o�axty't
i,
J ,.
0U1'1',C COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES November 49 197b,
a-dmtotn ,_,4 ngz t� the eQi�ith4 ee;t. 3oz'ne =Ta S' oa 2�°.' 22ND''' #, ti
thenam" ," 4J01 ft•a' the true point. of be nisi n�
g
of the herein L4.0ritted paroel; ;thanoo N ;00q' 58" 54'", `Vr '53G,;g8
ft.* thence S 320 38" 2�ii" �" �3�.1.y ft.;' thence 8 880551 1.P V4
327 , 07 ft, to the true point a be@; tYnt.ta
Containing 39-07' acres o vo a dr Tess
Vr pesos! lcommenait* t tI i.hterdeotiort oi" the oenterlai..tce s of
to the true point of 13" E> 40.01 ft.
,
to th Toru point
of eosit .ng Of the herein deearibe3 parceil
tl enoe iT 00 138' 54" Wo 204Q � 80 ft.; ,hems 'N 880 55" 1311
, 27.(j7 Ti, thetida S 329 6" E, 2641470 ft-; theriae S 570
21 34" W) 1:13'4.51. ft ,= 3 th4hzG ) S $89 55' 13" WO ,747.91 ft4 to
the true point o tiag n, ng.
r,
Parcel 2: dommenai,ng jit the soathwect oorneir 4i' 8ee; 27 T221T'�
Tt1Ey MD)3&M# thence N §8" 55' 1iti B1, 46.01 ft. to the true '00int
of °begi nnibg' of tit stein deny becl' pd,j 41; 'thetice N Ono 581
54" V,' 530,98 ftl enoe S 320 38' '26"T14 635+z5, ft h # thence
8 $80 55' 13" Wi 327.07 ft • to the tx,.te Point of begl4,,dnT-
All z6titaiti i�
k� � 7_ 9 aoxee2 tnbro or eed�<
7,=34 -1 -yo
A letter from Cal i i:orni a water .cervi ce Compah,� dated pctober 28 and one
from the City of Chico dated ctober 2;, 1�7',i were noted,-
...
Pre s , , - `p Peak either fd�'4 o,r a�
Wks'. �,en t- i n the eau i.er�ce t_a .,s e
F ga,nV, the
�r0 o5a1
Commis,sidnor SMilthl, took iss .e With.co made in ParagrptY,4 on;
'Page 13
I't W4s suggested that perhah,s a community sery.ice district could be
forOdd tb. handl 't000, of he problems.
_ f
the heawitig wa't closed a.d motion made. by Cdinrni.ss;o.ner Stt'h, ,se.onded
by Coi�missioher watters, to find the draft en Virohmeotal im act'report
;:
sufficient with the add tion of comhlents ►Wade tonight .and t e two letters
rated er1i er;�
AY.'1 1: : bm i1'ssi one s 'Camehii hd� �i lhd.rt� t�aore, mi f h,� Watso'► y
"hebach, 'w tterq: and Chairman Nanfa_rd.< 4.
N0053., No ane;
t
,
,
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING
COMMISSION,
MiNUTES November 4,1076
E�STA ED r- w di squa
ABSTAINt'
Commisfianer Le Ole h,o 1i=find hitnso.f r
ABSENI: No, one.
Motion carried.
Co'' PROTEST OF RILING NEGATIVE OBGLARATZQ RC"�A.�UING EN-
VIRONMfNTA.I» IMPACTfiEpO.RT. BY EN'J,.iRpNNTAL- REVIEW COMMITTEE
1 . Jo.hn R.. Teague Use permit to a1 lowauto & travel Arai 1-
e Gales lot 04,proparty zoned a'A411 located on the
�In.orthwestco'rner of Glenwood Ave. Hwy. 32 Nord Ave.)
containing1/2 acres tno'Te or essy Chico.
77-34�l -oZ4
Mr, Lawson noted that the check list was, n t used by the Environmental
Review Comsri tt
ee making this cetermi.nation but that their (findings
were that;
"The project poses no substantial advers environmental irgacts, noting,'
however, I t is not in conformance with he City of Chico oil Butte County
Generalrea Pl-aneh discussed impactfinfth°emmercial developmeht in thfis'
p
�� HWy 32 exone Environmental impact 'Report
which should be noted,
He then read a-letter of protest from Friends of Butte County, signed
by john L. Luvaas, Jr.
Propane �`s:
J'646A. LuVaas jr. stagy ed that this' developmeht tVbi�ld
>+ be well beyond existin �o' ea and,would,
and that the faot that m`nercido Gent `had' C'ontrobe poor.pre edent,
y 9
thfis'dev� g fi
was good reason to require an ehVi r � mental impact vreport. evert ne
Rave Lint ft,r6'v6 Echo Lane, Chico agreed with the statem
ent
Luvaas, s'.bf Mr
G'pRonohtst W t, '"PaV, Murphy. " 5ier' a'View Way.'oN►ner of 'the property,
enumerated the commercial uses in 'the ardb, said the drainage prob"tem
had been take,; care of and that t ere had been a 6 ft, fence b-ttweeh his,
and adjoioi"-e, �r`op rty idr years'whidh obsoure'd v'sfion,
John 'Teague, 3116 8hosh`oh16 Ave. thieb, the ipoli�cah-t, stated that there
would be no change in the costo, r of the propertyo bot that�`he wdu d
transolant,sonie of tho ,shrubs o t try back of the property. rn an,
uior
to a' � uiest�on from ole of
the firm si overs he'` v t6t'ed th t he would' use
one of ,the exiStiho buildiitgs or .art 'of�fi:oe And the tithe% for :storage
Of accessories or $'upplies�
77
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES - November, 4, 197
Commissioner Watters, commenting that this area is in tray slitiio11 n'`
1,�, , °gip ,t� wd; a, a, i ° !, $, 06ho 14 ir,hr t find �i
that even t�iought the pro,iecia i s sma l the impact on the env i ranment
co,tald be si'onificant, His mpt,i,o_11 W.a;, s.eca_nded 0,y COphilssioner Smith
AYES: Commissioners Gilbert► ith, WatterS and Chair;tnan Hanford,
NOES:
Commissioners. -,e C1er Moore, Thebach, Wotsoi and Camenz :nd.
ABSENT: No nn.e. y;
Motion failed..
Motion was then made by' a6m'i$sioner Le C1erc seconded by Comm. S,SIor�er
CamenZind, to deny the ppeal, finding there are no sigpifidant facts`
to substantiate the ,c ton tir�n.,.that there �tou.ld b,e a significant; effect
on 'the 'env i Pon men t,
AYES: Commipsi. peps Camenzind Le C lgrc, 1oore; Thebach and: Watson.
NOES: commis ioners Gilbert, Smith, Watters and Chairman Hanford.
ABSENT: No ;o.
Motion _tatr, ed. Appeal d'ienie;d..
U APPEA`I OP-ENVIRollMENTALRgVIEW OtIMITTE8"� UE,C19e1ON THAT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAcr RE00AT 'is k8oulRtb.
i
1. sidehofpNoNot '�eotati;ve t`bdi,vision Map;,' 1 lots9 �torth
wy. Oe'st of Carmen Lane, northwest of Chili,.,.
Owper: Arthuw' 01son. ,Enginee.r ,,Bachman En 9ino.e•wing
77-3,1-1-924
Mr.
Lawson reported that no check list was used in maktfi this Bete mi
nation that an environmental pact is required. TF�o Committee's find
Ings were;
"That an E.I.N. be required concer inq noisex' `te extension Of public serv-
ices into rural and remote areas of `BUtte(«aunty, finding further that
the projeot is not in confot^mance wi6,%t� hkl General plana
Ca; Bachmar�ypommented that th`e noiso 'iiti`ere�-the result of., t'ho rail
road operat�o9 and that nothingabout ,it kith or Without
andEn.virQ, mental Tmpact Report,, w
h
After some discussion as oto paten i il costs to T`tAxpayees r"or needed
se,rvioes� etc,, motion a;s made, bv�Co�tMISS 1oppr Wad,t6e4; toOopded by
Ummiasi`one,r•Smith to =y the fs'�j 0, indi�n, tltat`�there will ba a
f signifioant mp of at resu�t :.0, this pro�ett and that °ap En ironmegtal
BUTTE COUNTY\P-G COMMISSION
MINUTES - No,`1976
economits information, and that this ,mattor ,bo ,pla,G'4d: ,NFov'ot
l 8 age n da }
B. HCAh7,48 ON DRAFT E VIR'ONMENTAL IMPACT RCP0RT
FOR,
l Scenic Hi ghw` y E.l'ement
2. Noise tleme t, and
3. Safety and Seismic Safety Element of
the Suit a County General Plan,' and
HEARING ON GE RAL PLAN RLEMEN"f3 for:
(Same as abov. }.
Mr. Gaiser stated that a letter had been received from OPP4With wrtten
cornilnts that gave a firly good summary of what is now, missing in the
el r'
emen'ts� He said th t the mayor def7ctencies in the Safety and Seismic
element were that the hazard areas are nn�t identified and also the lack
of specificity re gar inti eat•thquake hazards
He introduced the two consul-tants from CH2M Hill, Bradford Rlandin an,d
Bill Rlosser and co mented that it was their hope to have the drafts
sometnotedime that., ancecoinrentsewi�lkebe onward dstootPteocomade, to writing; and
.
ul tati ts;
Dav0 ftrryo 556 W' nd Ave. said that one of the most glaring omissions
was the fitt.r �- t �
for the couity, ( ggther of the plans for the dlffereht r:ities and 'that
C ) w;
. ,, chicon suggestedt the consultants
take full advant a of i
Dave Lantts, lt;l OL
Arvifarmation avaableatgthe that
University--
particularly
tha available from the Geology department,
It was sUggeste` that therquick be a and easy to read summary at the
beginning of ea h element.
It was visors atted thet��ttethetevould be 3, new thes� elements are members of the Boardof Super -
to be approved, Chairman Hanford
wpuld be made,:'by the Commission whenever thepdrafts are 'ready,
commented tfiat specific ecomrtiendations and a sisal Of the elements
Chairman Hartford asked that time be sot aside on the November 18
agenda to consider a step -by -step -
program for comprehensive overall
_gam
81JTTE COUNTY PLANNING raMMISSION <-
MINUTES - November 18, 1`976
Motion: aaer'i4d;
Mr. Mendonsa thea asked that a,,ste plan 4e submi'tte'd' to .th`e Depart-
ment of Public Wor�:s for app'34b al of the site grading and drainage
Cbpimissionar Gilbert reigt"'roduced his motion for aproval, adding that
pp
a site plan mus-, be subaitted, to the Department of Public Warks for ap-
prove
p-prov II of site ``pradinD,°°,and drainage,
RYES:ith,
Comm?
n �, �'`GJatters and Chai rman Wa,- ord.
ssio►ers Gilbert, Camen�ind,, Le ClC1erc, ��aohe S
Watso.
NOES: No grGe.
ABSENT40 Commissioner Thebach:
Motion carried.
B CONSIDER M001PICATZON, DR, ARPROVCD DEVELI)PMENT PLAN 11
•. 1 . Robert a CotlWay Use permll t on AW 41-41 01, ' Li Me
Saddle �►tat.es Mobile Home Park, 1,35 spaces
Cnnsidew acceptable access from"Penit.w°M-dalia' Rnd, etc.
77-35-1-401
It'`tlas noted that r. To-ussa'iht was not pr'es:ei�t'°tb aristver questions
as to tyhat was reau' ed 'b,y the Fleal t}7 Department. Mr, Conway, 10
Ridgetai, Maga,l 7 a G
cammehted that test `hol eta required by the
feafth"Department had n ydt been made 'bait,-��-af course, they vrould
be
v M.r. Meodonsa commented ',hat a the time the briginal use permit was
aw6ved thv'Pent'z Hagal is 'RotXhod�n °:l ogin imps-oVed, 'butj At .t�hiit
!Mime, his �deoartment would. vle t�h� �t as feft; turn po-o�ket
strutted. Ile added that his en cementsy�i�.e3 be
is minimum teciui
pulb'l.i a Poad aooroach foo the, nortI Li -e dccess w h i �h ,,'s :,n c-, : ,pr6po:; ed.
Motion was made by Commissioner GilbeYt, 'econded by Commissioner Le
ale°rc,° to approve the Proposed ,development .klan, subject to the D
condi ti'ohs as required o the ori qi.nal use' Db�rmi t w'i tthe addition
of a 9th condition to reg0 rp construction of 4. public road aapi aaah
Pb"o Glories for aphror�a,l orior to the start of e-
bartme'r}t d�1 uli,.
for the northerly access. Plans for same to be submitted to the D
construction.
AYES: Cbmmi'ss3aners Gilbert, Camenzind, Moore,'Lue 41erc501.tir�
watsoni Watters, and Chairman lianfordti
Notss No bne,
BUTTE
COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION'
MINUTES,
- November 18, 1576
!� ,AI16,6NT'
Cha#iMi s s 40,01j 0
Motion
carried,
Conditions
are;
1.
peed 40 ft, of riphto-of..Wa,y Ervincni:erlino of Pents Road
.
to County of Butte. ,?
2.
Access to site to be likiited tovpark entrance 'Onl.y,
_
j;
3.
r
Department of public Works .,�ole eeview'abd 'appµove exact'
location of connection to ,P;'6ntz Road,
4.,
Provide drainage plans f 6 r approval of the Department of
Public. Works and install these drainage f6cilities.
5.
Completion of soil tests and approval of 'se4vee disposal
plan by the Butte -aunty Hea,lth
pepaetmert
6.
Butte County Health Dep'artm,ent approval of plans for proal
posed water sup.�`l,y•
wj%(h the requirements, of the State Division of
inance
Houpip.
8:
ComplyiancJe`wi th the requirements of, Buttes County Ordinance
..
N o • 6'.V l . it
Constr'tCtion of appesuublic road appr680 for the northerly access.
: submitted to, the bepartmoot of. Public Works
plans;for sameto b
for approval ,prior tt� the start Of construct '6b.
NN 1UMS'
ONINGS(UBI,TCIiRIN85) °
ti, I -- Rezaz�e '�w n ,�A,, ,r Cf;e�ie +a) �b "h�--7 ►' I, ght Itauettial� ),
I Daft Ha�Agwri
,�A-��" et wra.!��.�es�ti,at�morea�.ceo����axae�.o)P,encli�`ra�J—I't�°blic), azul
"S t 1" �Subuxbo '%R-111 (8ubutba. ii
0ra91$) Ptopetty
Xooa.lted on '�iho etutt $�. UT CQhastjet l baa,, notch of Vt,toki neatly Chi.00)'
a,be e .
SR 1.. That pot+i0,11 off` dots 8 thx h
'Recol,-a
.y
k
and c�&r 3 th tau h 6 a' P 11 11th nuts Per flap bt ani
leap tock 1 bks PAgb 67 6:r tho But d6unty Recota r 1040ted, zidtrt'
0:e 8j otuheto Creek.
5'UIM COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS: ION
MI;N;VTES W November 18, 15 71
„ descpt;ing the+aroarsfarom n, 004
xibed mi thin , rM
„ they'01.l oNvi3
Commencing at tea interseatioal of the cex��`exlit�e�,;+�� �%a�O» Read
And 0ohassr�t Road; them 880 55 r l3;"r :s 40»01, ft. to the truo
p of be 'hh here�.n ci,escsyic.pacss.;benoe N 00
/a ,1 2844 t-80 x t . th snc e ;tir �f'8� 55" a 3'r ` t; 32 � .,
V r _ '� �, ; 1 �v p7 t: ; thence
32 38 2 rnl 2641.70 :`t» ti;a;ao �S 570 2l' 34'r V11 is3a.5l ft» .
�; the+hoq y
8$o 55 r ! 3" V4,, 747 »91 ft -"cho t:ol,* 'Pian of beginning.
Porta-inirg, 600 aores3 more at! les,"
µkie 51�1�1.
�'V c tax+ "1 ri
i tktb saf a#' $ec: 2: T22N, RIF,
8,X0apIrw thoxatrnrtt the nort".erly 20 ft- of :tho �'1 of tbrc,,'i.o';;
said Zea. 21 the �r 3 .o ft. of said aec
located. within the '• NwVi descxibed avea e><kd Choi, a
OommPnci n at C;lie r�tth�W st oornHr of deo. 2y 'I'2Mfi,
thence N 880 55' 1-1" 0.01 ft- to the trite ,port of be+�ildaitag
4
n da�sCx'beprcel.; thertae 00° 58' S,q'' ti'ly30. 8
of tb,e, herei 5
,her a 3 c' 8' 26" Xj ,,05*1:5 ftp°; �tk�enoe S'r$�3a 5"�' 1�'' ��'
327,07 ft. to the trr point or
beairrntirig.
nirig, 200 acro , more or les8.
Tho westerjy 340, ta off' Sec.. 2 . T N>• R.1F:y
" uxompting thore tom the nartherl)r 20 ft seo.» 2,
, I % a1
Q� said steno
that pc,ron 3, as,t
ed within the #°011OWiVg described proportyi
2 T22
�0Mmata,:iAg athe sautharlr�st ooxner of Sec. >, N, Ftlr �ilk98e 7
thence N 889 55, 13,.E t, 40»01 f+,, to the trtti� ' '
0int�tof' beginning
of the heroin aesaribed ;parcel.; `thenoe N 000 58' 54" W) 530.98
tlie�i e S ° �3 M 2farr , s 635�l5 ft• theyme ,s 880
327.074 f, , to the trua point of beginning's
0ont�y` ng 3947 abrps more 'or, Ions
pWC t i'c el d` c-Ot tenoitq oA the intstveatian,o 'the aeriterlir s p
V tort Road e,nc! Cohasset 'lead,; thonca N 880 55' 13t, 40►0I Vit»
a the true port � � bvg rtni� ot` rho herai� �era0a �ibe3 parcael;
thenbo N tJto W 28
5 ye 44,'8i� ft+; thena� X 88 551 13"
32'707 ft,, thanoo 8 32 38' 26" E 2641.70 ft.; 'a
r.. r rr . ,� M ,� , thence S 57
f 2l 34 �Il14.51, tt�-- thaw6 `S 8 t rr �
553 �1, 147.91 ftp to
., v
,
r` ,
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMI$SiON
MINUTES November 18, 1976
t. !�4•C� ;a,
I'd igce1 2: Cownencirig at the southwest caoxnor X60 sec. 21 np%
'RIBI MT�b&Mj thonce N O80 550 1-311 Ey c}0•b1 ft,�I to tho tVU0 paint
o hbA3i nrd'n9 of the hero�.n doOc,ribecl patc03,4' thence 700 561
54" 'V's �3D.h8 ft.; tht)hoe 9)32a 3$' 261' � � 635. 5 -+. $hc�dao
S 8O�'
55' 13" Wi 327 * 0`j t t • to the true .l biftt at begi nijizn'
All containinn, 71+49 acreey more or 1,®ew»
77-35-2-705 _
Mr, Lawson read staff findin s and added/ti
X g rat he had tallied to Bohn
h Ai mart
klonie, Chico Plannin (1tre.:tnr, .and. had een informed that the
Commission had expressed coat arrn rPciard nq the proximity of the nro,� �
posed M-1 zoninq.
Proponents i `Jae oi`E was present to VOpres'egt the applit,can:t,
di l3bl' Manchester Road Chico r'e res
Barb ra Cope 1 an t �'
s,e1i" as an int�breste�d individual,�'but aiso the}'�Pr endstjofn�Butte ccnot diu:nty� r
questioned the nracticality of ,rezoning this grWnq laiid to A-5 f;ar
the reagnn that its use for gVia"zinO ,would be almost completely lost by
to Bial an iq5 ate aiacree parceI5. :She added that in order. to-obtain"'Fed
constrruction Of a sewage disposal syste,m that
it wag necessOrY to state lehat we "could n(� 1onger'develop without
servicos available", and-uestioned when,if' is apr�ropriate to rezono
to perlittit such residential uses.. -as would hle permitted ill_ this nr000sal,
Commissioners `expressed concern that P - Nino would d ...raise the.
valuation of the land} and the feas�abil�ty of septic tank sVttems
for the oroposed ret dential zones and pointed out that one of the
a i ternat1 ves to P- zoning noted oto Pale 14 of the Cnvi roMttiental
Impact Report was o reZOhe to R C,
fir, Lawson vfarne a gafnst having a zohinq pronesal that would conflict
With the new el
ML
of the General Planl
the was madeing u Gomm�ssioneraWattersrtooreultation with Counsol
" r a motion,
oo�nmend. the approval of zoninq
for this arP�6 as fol lows r
S%-1 s pr000sed
A'tJO as proposed
Delete M-1 and add to A -S, and
belete Pu and substitute R -C,
r,
!' EV,E COUNTY PLANNI COMMISSION
r° MIN ES November 18,E 1976'}1 a
`
Mr.. aa;� re.porte:d that,.�he. Tannin A�e:�rsartment had receigr�
�a.rp'I1. �,,�"or�h,t�ar�ian, �►e' i sor�;e
the
hway) ''x�1,���►e and,, asked for a deterMipatioh by the Commission as .
�
to whethe1^ fir` not�i<h�s useshouid bei doniderel'�uh'd6r'"`ti�i�hway`'
e'r ces pri t\�d
r fq thd' conVb►iti t ce of the trawel i rtg ub1 i-��1
After a lengtscussi ori; matron was mai de by 'Commi ss i ol Bertseconded by Cssioner Smith,(7QQ;),, that it i� the findings of this
commission that s\torwgd of redreat `on `Vdhi,dl'ds ft' : nbt.ib `be oott'�
si dered -as a 'sL6W o for the cohvdh'! ehce` of 'bhp , b�ra`vel' �t , ,pub��ic
under° the y -H :pori ng' r•dinande.: ,
Commissioner"
AYES: Gilbert, SmitClatters, Le C1erc, and Chairman NanfQr
COMWI,$tfon6rS
n „
NOES; Oamohtind; Moare�nd IVatson.
ABSENT: Commi ssi ones Thebaohr°
iati on carried.`,
a,
REOESt 81446"P# K.
,r4EET1NG :RECOWNEb: 9:10 h. M _
commissioner L� C erc did not .return }to the me„btinq,
v
M
D ENVIRONMENTAL ARVItW 'AGENCY
:
10 rosponse to quost
a � ion from G�,I„a-i�'han �iianford,� Mr, Laws 60 stated
th,t :it was his unddr9tand1h t:tiat a proposal` wou7,d be made o the
Board this next Tuesday W ihirlO creation of a sooarate onti ty
res ponsI"bl+a to the A sti ative Office whose duty i t wouI be to
taka caro of all ir,onmeptaI matters.” He, added th,a the present'
ordinanco does at pi',4i' .'pint responsibi l it;, that `tiie'` Pl anning De-
l'paetment h neither resnonsibilit,y or athorit,v; buf`only one
seat oq person committee --that his'department had°"'gado do with
what t"e heave" and that the hoard had expressed great dissatisfactioh
C, ENVrRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS
pisdus'sioh ai to hhW bast to obtain heeded ir fotmatjbfi
pat�ticula'rlly odn.�eri�iil� eooiiiii»e it>pa�Ct.
Rega>~din;g tiie Oomrriisi;ion'ei es fres ed`dtrnrrerna r69aYvdiriq itit�i e419
input and appeal, 'Counsel a Dred th'am that,thetd r7`ciitts tlrould `oe
prototted` by the new environm tai re'viow quid.elines which aee' being
i
BUTTE COUNTY PLA (SING COMMISSIhty Y �
RINUTES November 18*, 1976
p,����.Y"Grp
Conc,er, gain pApIr d,..,a�;;ou ', t a.Gk` o mil it. ;gin '
o� we.re� a
P v date .
by the Cour ty ` a,f 0u;��t,e. n ° f;°khat'."ean' �?e . r r tot ' i'nte u .
q . a. 1 e
information to be mi 'a a part of an er►vi ronmert'�R impact rteport�--inso-
far as the ,Dost rr,..common i ter t!AX1?4 dors , of � � s�« �� i op n
r me, t s c. ncerned,
Com�n:ls:ionpr,
Smith sht d i,n#grmat+` s �vaC]7.e`�i�►�iother
s��c�gostedand'tha uaeputi I cat? nob the -eO� � tuteaark. d p hots e,W bhp
in 1�7�y entitled, Cost P., S raw... . `on
,, e.�earch' Ggrpor rt.1
p � , �� m �i�t be Itelpful � +.
Chairman:�ani'ord"conti6ued'this,, i't'. f^r^ �'voee s ani requested
that the Commissioners each br,fng a dr'a`fYt af: a s:t Lemont of their
feelings concerning the impoirtand o_f' the receipt of i'n�'ormation
concerning the economic impact o ' d pro,j'gt,
w�
M
GENtRAL 'PLAN
Consider step by step pray
ram i,�r comp rehens i:ve, over-aa'll
revisions
17=34-4-550 -
t
Staff handed out`a" �- bge memo on w `ipnera I plan ev tion `Program" ;I
Bob
ai;�er reviewed tt e �su�,iect� ��;`,the r�el:�u and :asked for input and
comments.: He recom ended a list fi Al shbjeci,,.s and organization for a
completely revised ' Ndra� n1an �P'r~epar'art d,� eou �d ;f� a ibl,v take
place in the order of sections ou�`ined th.
i s
1 Y.ntrod '
c .ion
�.hlr'fronlneni:'a'1 S,ettin.
u
Res Q roe,, ConservativM 414, al Liala rds
I t
'Pu
i
a b is Fad
c, 1
� ,
r
� � µ,
�7.an;d Use
Alf � mandat ry elements are in tfiIs ou,rli
.included ttc,.- 44 y'i1, �s
SGve.ra1 othe subjects reouired outsido of general pj`an req uir{etnents.
a 10-ye�.r/ Spheres of Influence plan should be developed in conjunction
with LAFC. The Water and fewer Plan should be updated. Social Service
hat been, proposed by FOC as a Coneral Plan E � l Qment but it is not
oomplet6ly within the intended focus of 'r,h,Ysical develat�nre' Vii 'ARecrea Ii ph E1 emen,t i,s optional, e The County's Mandatod Solid Was to
Management P1 an shayld be flicl cd I , ti ene�ral� �� a:n 'die general
timin' on+ costs of public faciliti'Ales shaulzfi be la��d out in a t�aoital
mbro eMe" ts 8octi0,11 800Reol0hal Tra �s'at�rta ictn
i dap,: sboul ,,, be
dovet�1111el into tfie Ci roul,ati,orx, iemend, of Aho er en ' lad.
OUTT.E COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES - NOvetnber 1$;, 1976
The State i s now considering deri'ng maSor revisions of the <req.ui remen'ts and }
enteritt of the Uous'1111g �Tt e�n' of the c treral P"Iar. e als r ta't d
t t he had sent in comments to the effect that the proposed qui de
lin ; mere nice, ;but that butte Countu Would not !>e able to mnleti�ent
themf' 1979,
A comple Land Use Clement requires 'the input of all the orevious
sections. The Land Uro Map will be relied upon by masteoole and
should rear sent a sYhthesis of genera] PI-an policies, Gaiser
ores'ented si
3'
.maul:.. of gene � G�� x 36") and Scale (1'` 2,U0,Q' ) for lttrrje�; scale
plan designations for 'the county's 4 urbah'�areaswhere`
most of the neo 1e live:
Chairman Hanford estioned the use of Department staff in ot-enaration
of a Social Servic plan, Gaiser pointed out that public facilities
blatoanwellye an ss.devel�heidniJabutt�tof County� nMocer. Layrson that th
ev wore not
stated that the ►rater
and Semler Element was a focal point of the 1971 General Plan,, that
aCAG still used it to eview grant proposal's and that it should bb
updated by a;r engineeri n consultant.-
Commissioner Gilbert and 1r. Gaiser discussed the need to revi`e
zoning regulations after he , Plan
was completed. Gais:i� di s
cussed the difficulties of doing general plan with ex'stt,c� staff...
i 6
77-36-1-000
Gasser recommended a time-fra a of 10 years for I'
9 Y a nlanOno her'od for
the County's General Plan. P anhih for lon,aer periods is oftp
based on very speculative ass u'0ti0h9- The planning process sI not
develabed enough here to realistically plan for long- periods.
Chairman Hanford asked (120) what staffing is required to revise
the plan. Gaiser replied that a planner and a draftsman would be is
minimum, but that it was difficul toestimate further needs because
of upcoming changes in Qenartment duties.
Commissio,h�r Gilbert asked about 0' rtime pay for Department staff
Staff replied that overtime pay was bssible but that additional
staff Was needed anyhow., S `
,y taff des used the costs and difficulties
Of r,lahnihq to a large and' diverse to my a;ith both urban and rural
areas. (` ) ., areas
be plannedmforsseparatelhandkdtiffeenthat urban ani ruri .
y, f�lr. Larson cbmmehted
that the frame of reference of pebolo in the: Craig-MbOretOW Midge area
and other rural' residential areas is vast',y differenct from that of
�rrban fringe residents, Gaiser stated tha rural land uses should
be designated before urban uses, and that t ere is no reason that
y
.. r�
1 .ter
-
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMT$,S OI
MINUTES December., lo.y.:
.77, 38-1,10. T
.�N^ 'Y.a1�RY+Y!R �kR'
IS: R0L'L CAI. Present: Co�mmis,sioner$ Camenzin,d,Vbdre,,TSMTth T 11 e 1;,,I ch:
Watters, and Chairman Hanford
bsWit , Commissioners Gilbert
, .Le Clete and Ivlatsan
+ A1so, :Pren Jim Laws 6h Jdhfl Mb ddgsa',' Del
Sidmsen,
Bnp Ga�i�ser,Jig, Skj'o1s`tad-Gh'��co' Enterprise
Record, Hazel Dallas
III.; APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mi,lnOes, :for ClovoMber. 1"8, 1.976 a re ..a
4i _ � � � pp'roved with the fb11o�1iri ,':�
ail ,ti an0t.�.!,r I ne
.� pago ;6. 1i.
A motion. to, r co sec
e y -
o rmneild to the SUPIsl hors 41 at ,thr- .
A was Wade by Commjssior�er Camenzind, andod b� Cammissianer
_y do ;0stab`t � s h i n g
s=anitary :se,wdi, �A stt�icth And,,dxplare t'} p'ossib111tI"' 's of a-il"ne'xat10n
toI:the'GltY of Ghica b.eyfore dE.yv.el•opm( is . Wed' in''th'is �,r6ppsed SR -
j
, 24ne, The Mtidh, w,as;. dnahiimo(Is�ly,;d ri��ie .. 1.t, n� �
,
PUBLIC HEARINGS
� A REZONE -(CONTINUED 'FROM NOB�14BER 1 1976)
1� Par �i.:.
ads poo/'Q
(Ban,dil,Yrk District ARezone from
t o +i 'la
P-1 A & C� >,
P- (PiPublic) property located on +r�the
r.test side toadnorth of Bidenti field a's AP 5I-072-35, more,
particuaryaT'hc of tl easterlyf3`b1Q5 'the tbutheely. t I08.3.88
ft. "�
16 lg 5 ft of the southwest 1; bf the Westerly
_ � /4 of Seo. _
T,2. �N M i°1DtAM.,,
1.0:
CmltainInq O�SS
acros, maro� or less; 'Pararlse
7730w1-79 �� 5
Propohents Y/,
7e,t"r�r A hc� ropre ehtdng the ��a(radis--`o6'Re'Croati6h thd'pa "yDisi:lict,
5801 Pe tx,a Rbha:d, stat;od th rt the +sub )est barb°dh ras' idjhodtit "tc� 90
cr s, e,Yn;e,� J' bh,e, rec ��a i or tli strri ct;r that°'�►ad bt6h 2bhed �P `0t' Tor
some time and that it.was 'proposed that this;-parbo� 4HW`1lid 0.�--del for
,
It
a w
JJ44
LUTTE COUNTY PLANNzi'm Commi,SSIDN
MMUTES w gd*Lember .0, 197 ,
ac ss when, and if, the adjacent property is d.ovel iitr.
stat d that the Tack of funds would preclude an lad dsca.1 f"urth►er
de
in.th. futt�r;et Tn �espv.ns aiues.ti,6r t�,et„�dtfit'iiliiranenindy
v o ir�en
he s d that the master plan for Paraidise Recreation
Was; n4@ Qmplote eatton and Park ;District
Opponents: A petition c:011taining 49 signatures was presented,
Ken Chan:'.all r, *5CS Wagstaff, Paradise, e.xpresa:edcQncern .that 4i:iae
area cou_;�d.,be,,cieveloped t a, ho:ut ..cons,de;ratib� a tl`rd side effects an,d
,aided i<k�a�ts any further development mould upset the Wildlife in the area.
Mw. Ashe had fib mments inrP1)utt';
al.
Commissioner hanfor stated that in ttlecbmpany of Mr. Asha and at.
th,e r.eq`tlest ;off rosi.d rets ,,of the~.area” A e had, vierue�6. bad 6r+ea�xr�,r'der�
cansider'atian and add d that .the dril,ya:devoTop�ret�t tlt�r°rth�- a,dja`:6ert
Parcel ; O for picni ck rig,
.rhe hear;;[fig pias' clo5•ed an mo)tjon Mh,dY e� by
seconded by Ccmhrissianer°I a,rey. fiat den+af'in d n, ,su'ffrdiett' ;need
has, mot �b,een oestilb�l:i�shed to....w- a'Pramt t4z�''new� xc�wfn�� f tnd'ing "fu�rxther
that♦ stic zoning
W 0, U I d, ber det,, mdrrtal.t:o",.tha, sfdmi.ts of t6d`i 'trraund-
0, g R-1 A & C District.
AYES* Commissioners Comenz n.d\C�le'&
ii�h
Thebach & Watters.
II NOES's Comkissibner= Hanford,
w,� tson Lilbert,
ABS�lr./�C"yo hri s s i on e r4s tJan 01arrlepprpp-`Mr, A,e a:i5ed, afi fie ae.
I
A PPE A
L'or-BUTiot OUNT,Y -ZaNiNS 80A110 or ADJU5TMENrDEPts,��N D,YI:AC,
1. Linda &, Narold Sutton Variance to allow a I'M
acre pri'rcel in a TM -1:0 MOO— Mountain - 10 -acre
oa eco -AS), z001e on aronetrty .l acated on tho wes t s i de
of i"roy b1a+/ aaoraxinidtely Boo ft. soui�h of Cal ter
t`la,i!'ri i dents f ed as 'AP 54L31 -Ob, Mhgal i a
7 7- Uii- j -
T'he quer tion . lamed atoly arosb .orioef6`ing the sego,-JJtY► br pro r`iety
of r►e',rin of 'an .appeal b a ,nirte.ftiombP� bo:dr bfroth�i.oh threes°� thoso
hohibera.are a14sa mernbe.rs,of the Bbard oi"`xon n 'Ad� `stt�dnt wti6 tirade
Up origitiailenia
w
,
BUTTE COUNTY f LAWNING ,COMMISSION
MINUTES 2, 197'
Counsel Si emsen reminded tho Commission that the Ca-Pa,prehensi ve
,tonin Oroinan°ce provides fear t1iis prucegcl re
�' i`�' `�„� �}.' 1v -
er a `;r Cher 'l,"ongth.y �"dl scq s"ign,, hai°rman� W�ahfbrd� ca 'ffn�oe'd' this
. att ,r 2 ,Wee,'ks aw;atn t;i n g cl aari f�i c�a ti;:on o,f� P raper 'nrrocodur s ay
C.ouns �h" s tten Fopi.0i on,
1, Marsha K. Grage, etal - Rezone- from "TM-,5" (Timb.;r
M1'
M.o►tnta16 �S acre 1o'ts) to `�`T� 2 'I (fiinl6er
0 acre' lots ) prbperty Lmnera 1'l 1 o Morrttatl s
" t Oast tl,f "'Vi1at
R. && app'rox. one rail1e bbrfith r3 �p0 oa
i tide 6 a,a day, ,more
�pI ,ticularl,y destribed as:
he 5'y, of the NO'of Sec. �4,' `�Z'4N ' R?'i+
Th sou•th`erIy 495 ft, of, the,, NES of the NW rgf
Sec: 24, T24N� -Rgl' MOB&M
L, .
The 5W of Sec. 24, T24N, 1t2B, MOa&M.'
Conr*.,i ni '�; 255 ac�►�e's,: `mo a or "fess`, Cohsse'fi"
..
77,,L 324
i c 'tr
Jr wson read° sta ff f'ind'itr s' rtdreummen'ted that the, i•eftirencvd5, n
the �s'ecohd°'�"parat�`ah r"tlm tih'e .gypt.o,m,rto "°I to 5 d�i'erl l ing .un-itspr
are'is'haul d Y'ead:lino
1 t h a `re_s J. r d ire l .i� 4. Y -
Proponents Steven Grage, .nox ,1.50, oh.as„set ,Stager :C.h” co, :sai:'d °'viat
thise'1�eceh°t i^e onf tg to TM-5'vias 'not iarranted, beCaU$e .,f limited access
(two miles from the county,
rpad);1 stere mess of�r'pat"t �o,f ��thearea,;°niaot
ofi gator alai 1 abs l i;tytwd l inti ted `fire rote,cti on.ra
4J 11 td v- P. '0. Boit 4581 Chfdb repoete that Jiin Snowden, field
biologist for .D of t on of dish• and 'Ga.lne, sta ,ed, that, this prepos;�T Would
be > a Positive 'sif;ep Ah pr'°esteveztf ort _o f., wi l d l fe, that this area was
hdtbriously bad for Water. He Added ;that thee were severail tre�c
fhrms in the area that small
parcel in,9
could af�ect.
Qniitrttents:''' `Ct�ra �ieitf, Gohasset Stage, stated thk,�t :,he nwn«d; X.4 acres
and added that she had 4 children and asked wheth& sloe could build a
House for each. of them on this p ,;»c l t. th the pr.o sed 2ohi�n§, "°(AT THIS,
H ill °T1dC0 lSI5 t NC' 5 Ii"a `CRIB ` OADINA:R.CE iME PPA E .T St of 1"oiil ied
th,aC�i�hpparentl v p ' 9
ii
a use POrmi t fior .rnurl.t .' le ho'ustin be notressary
in this zohe, but that 4 indivill6al houses 1could not bei"constructed.
There was some disagreenieht as to the number of sebstandar; parcels
that would be created by this reZohih
66 �.
BUTTr COUNTY PLAN PCIPIG COMMISSION
MINUTES -December 2, 1 g?6
Mrs. :Charles H tings, 210. �,Irvi'ng Avenue, Glenraa1,,c, Ca,�,, or1ner of prop ,
arta adjacent o Mrs. 0e�rx'stand"tha, after., ch.eaki:t� t� tih, p.�^aper.
a�utlio:rit.ids i�n:� h.e'.co�urty s�hc purchs'edA prc el"s `ah"d��t t;iewtime she
made appl,�icatio for bui ld-ing „per'mi'ts •thO `County d,et.er�Aned that she
had only one par el--that lyre parcels had b�odh oreated �,'1,leg'a`1l'y She
stated that she alt the signprs of the petition Were trying to farce
their will on oth rs, since several were owners of What tlouid be,
subs t;aodard
parcel and had: purchased their property after.: the 'i'M••5
zoning had been pl ced on the area„ She later, 6tktd that lier property
be excluded from ti s proposal for'L-zohir,1g,
eared awsbD commented that the Hasting, hO1&-?1nde�etj t ur
� ollased What �ap-
pbe 4 Vrcel that taxes had been on 4 separate parcels,
a46d thats in es tigatio
res had revealed thdt the Assessor`s
Offide had tndoed creaed
4 pa�roels { but that, h'e Was unable to determine
the circumstances sura unding their creation--that the matter had been
referred to the Distric Attorney's Officia Ifdr inYestigat or,, and that
nathiig had yet tlevelo
pe as result of this invosti gation
n rebuttal, Mr. Grage _s.t tel th�lt the C+oha.!�s':et Community Association
is supporting this zoning roposdl
The hearing Was °closed, Co Mliss ones Watters questioned the co-s t. to
taxpayers to se:rvjce this re otei area acid ma,d.e a ntoi;ian. to recommend
Y appeoifal to prevent furthers bdivision and
area and to�save the taxpayer an undeterminedo'omounth'ofwmoney'in pro-
vidin services He found the proposal, in confo,rmi,ty with the:,•Gbneral
Plan. He found further that th subtt�rid.ard parcels wdul d,: have. -the
same permittee uses as standard arcels (as state-A in ;the �`TM-90,"
Ordinance), Hits mntibn .was sed"o dtd' by Commissioner Smith.
AYES:,� Y
Comm :ss oners Moore, smI'the Wdtters and hairman Hanfr�rd.:
K
NQS : Commi`'s-sioners 'Camehzind ali'd' ThebacU(6oth;';xpressed� the
feelings that properly or f oth M`rs, �Gei r and Mrs. Hastings
should have 6,�dh excluded)
AHSCNT C:oinmi ssi offers 'Vatsnii, Le' Cl er and ,VGi 1 bdrt.
No action.
Staff 6VaS asked t0 rnn�jPs't that the absent �OTTII�oS,lonrs 1'(:�t.n 0'
the tapes and rFevioty available ma�tarial
Cbnlmist'Oner Catriohkibd asked than a de tion also bn mod;e as
to
the In standardhea�del1 that would be .ceeated �f this
the nurribdr. of sub p
y
g ,prdp�o�a1 7
s mb�de . ,
i
-4-
.
BUTTE COMITY PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES December 2, 197
Geon e U. T axstes Jr,Rezone from o ��
A R (A r!cult
e �� idoo ti a,j) -to : 'Ci '
A�. Crilft��i�
ji 3 6 0 thea youth say.: '
d
g Road, 1Opto imatQly bye mile
eo t of, ,Canyon Hag11L41idsi Draive 3n.tersacti n, dote
de `paYt%culaxly
•cri.bod a5: a
The nottherly 455 ft, of the soLithe „,1y w65�LT.
J of tho wosterly 100 ft. of 5c�c;. 3, T19N, RAE„ �Fg Wit:,
11,81`i,
Gontai;ni.rig 1.0 acrt, " identi.i='i.eci 35-01-090 ax'ovilire,
77-39-2-719
This rezoning iroposal teas initially set for hearing on September
16, 1976 and, at that time, continued indeftinitely.t gra `rea°ver
tised for toni ht's meeting,
Mr, Lawson rea staff i•indings.
Proponents.- tir;;
p Elizabeth Barnes, 669 Long liar :Road; wife of the
at,107 I C.On t, stat .i that her `hu$band head been eall.e,d, oust of town on
bts r�we�s a t could,nbtattend ton i '4t' 11s meetin, S,he,;expyained
that the rc�as�on the a.ppfil,"cati.On 'Was than". he'r ,hUsb-4 id was a critp-
Plearnd was s fb.j6c o'"epyle ib sei'
P p ' zi�res.` an,d that the ,kehabi 1 i ta.tion
LL j . � w g" P T g, es ted
p. merit who would" }�+a7+y Isom et set u =:�'n busie st dad su g
that 'the business -bc in h�� r s7dence.
Opponents kgmoton 14cOa'ethLo'h l:oad, 1lrov lle stated
ghat mosit` o f the residents bf the area , 11,a�d' otd,pjr ,' �thei yprdodrt
for
ower 20 Yours and that their prttar�/easo�i, io��
Do -
to Ka: a ecce and' 4r c;w, ung those was
p quiet, Fle said ,ho was"si;re ti1'e;ttehabiiitation Dem
partfien�t, would' const der snot' o locatl611 Ifo. added that th'tt i s a
narrow µoad not condlaci ve t`- t'r ffi oe that a rrloi brdyclie repair h,O,p
would bring. '
Lett�e4r.s; 'expr.essing iron"oern about additional ,tto$s;e and traffic,
from the f;o1 iowin.g p`e`rsons ere ' eb,ad:t
.6'o6 ,qe V ,T Ma,rjorio .0 l ost 60�- Long Rar Road, o)rovi lle,
Arthur 103aeksd`a1.e, 66 Valley ti is D ive, find
Mr. & Nes. R6na`i d L Paul kner, 671 ►ung Oar Road, 0rovi y le.
A poti tion was 'also, in file donta.iniiig ' he �natne5 'of 1 res 'doiwts,
5 of whom stere not' mentioned 'abdve., ,
Trt rebuttal; Mrs,,: BArne"s s.tate.d that ,mot," of ;t:he work tou1'd bo engine
work and not testing in the machine Itsel ;
Commissioner Camenzind,commented that all possibie US'S in a C=2
I'TT CQUNTY PLANNING COMMZSSIOPI
hINUTL'5 - Uocembeak 2j 197E
Commercial} zone must be considered at location.
he., �ttg utas closed:arid: ntion made... ar.�d.r~ i, 1 ►� �:;C`dn�r�riss aper
' �r.�
,�, F�►�d'in,gs u�erehat �iicf ).K"o7 �asa.l.��does��:to��confcn�n t the
General Plan,
that, the area is primar"il,y residential; that such a,
zoning would b "spot" xonang,, and that :the. effects .would' be det-
rimental to the neighborhood. Flis motion was seconded by Commissioner
Th�4�Ac.h
AYES:' Commis ioners Camenzi;nd, Moore, Sm th,�Thebach, Watters
k
t and Ch i rma,.n jjahford.
NOES; No one
ABSENT. Commissioners Gilbert, Le Clere and Watson;
MatIon carried,
The applicant was a ''rai sed of the appeal procedul e,
Cit.zen$ Group Ra'
,w
m . ►
Rezone from A
Y ns�.11
ASR-i fo'r, 1-'1/2 sq. a >, more or less ,�lpcated south a -R to
l
MWy, , east �of. Oftkval.,e .Ave,. o'f 01 sire
,_. R4,);, north of east-west rcenter7:ane of
Sec. 23 and 24 x19 .and west- of wast bounca,ry luxe of
Seo. `18 19 r T19N, R5E, more pard. ularly escribed As
• Lots 54 throt h 67 and. Lots 69 thr,ough 9,2 'of .
10y
soutrrille���V a doth l ritparnds P '► locatnd
Oro y nit: Ncr 3
h of Oli .e f4 . way, er MAP o ' � ecoid in LLNtar
13ook 11
on P ge.s 19 and 20 wf the Butte, County
c an that portion Of Lot SS 'of sa5,tl �f6r
T�ecorder
o,.
y rf
aril le -1,� and to Fru tl and Un�lt No � �, l ovate°d e
of the foil tqing described line.
Coburiending , t he most eas�,terly oorner of sn'id
5 thence ,dt
60, 44', g Alann9 the southerly line b:r
said Lot 5 55S.62 f-ta to the true point o f beginning
of the heroin described ,line, thmiico N.35o Q'S' t1,
485.16 ft» to the south right-of�-j� ay Lane of ftol
I431.9hway", nd the end of the he ei 'described line
i
All oli Lo 9i, 94, 95,, 97:y -Jia, 9g : that portion of
Lots J6, ' iOS )- And 106 Located an the N 1/2 of Sec. 24,
T19N, .R4Fj NtDll NI and that.portaon of Lot 163,10.6a
Last of th drovil.le Ifyandntte irri' ntioit fl t o
Ditch, alL` .sa;ier Pfiad lots in 'iOroVI1le-tV'yandotte Fruitlands
Unit No. � 'P p of 110cdtla n riap Door 11 ori Pdges
.
(1
DUTTC COURTY PLANNING COMMISSIOiJ .,
MINUM - December 2, 19',rG
!
� ;
ih4�e ,..
: c'
- 1r�cated sou I r-
: Thfi rta oh oec'tian; 12,.g.'19�`,�, l�iI)I3fl1t
th '� 1. ivo- {{�' y `try ►+
J �., BALL'.}X S+r�
at porton o5 Lofts 18 19 20 a
Tinct" dei 'Map. o E 'Roco�d nd 21 ,off !,T,,akV x e
in �Tdp Hoo'. �",� ani Pale
of,'Ithve: But`, e 'County ;pec'o der ocote� e, t o the?,;,
Or evil l ee -Pl
fit ion 1)iStrict Di c4"
y nda xri
tte l g
i
. ' v 1 .fit e.
That portzox� lof the N 1%2. of 5ec:, 24, 'i'1G;N', R4�
PfiDBfi�hl locate east of "Qrov:i lle-lY
M1i t, No* 4t' p r Ntap 'O'f 'Recor'd in
artcic�tte Fru .,ti.ands
27 2820'30• ap Bo oC ]?ae
That portion o the ;V' 1,/2 of the E
1/.2 of Sec.f 11
T19N; 1 41;, 1�tnS& . ,locafied souith o r�0� > 1
g44a3`. ,
Or'ovil l e, ,
_7»40-1-52�4„. .
Mr. Lawson remi1nded the Co
ramissi n that this rezoning had been heard
by ythe Commissia.. On,Se t.embe=r 15 ?- ._x_
rt conEin,do- iridefin`�telt' pending'i;h outcome do faCpuatvlthat, e', 'been
litita7ion, He
added that this ite�i Chlas .,since bee ria advertised "a,nd, again
staff fihdinas �-
Proponents: j8 I'll Hansell, JS5 5kylkd 51udr, Oroville
history of the zohin.g efforts for is area, and Closedgave a short
u.by s.a,yin' .hie
felt
this to be` a proposal that was ot, unreasonable,
No one.apwaF:,red tri speak�`� :A letter from. Mari::eti;�..L Allard,
13102 Dieriex D�iVe, Moubtain View, Ca• was noted,
The hearingWas closed and after Some me scussion motion 1+1as made by
M
approval of this proposal, finCommis ones Thebac,h td reComme, d
atn os �c er ��is o secaI f by ing it to be a �ampat7ble aht red
vl; 10
zoning for the area and that it conforms cl,o;sely;'to .the G'eperal Pl';�o
of the County and for the City of broville Ne found: further that all
sudsaziri
Butte COURt,y PI
anning Commission,
Minutes - Decep(ber 2, 1976
D. 'APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL OF-VI'E,W, COM
a M t T -T C S D'E(T�SION,-TIIAT
V R MENTAt 1�1, AXT 01ft -,, ft -
JR, N tfs
q ,County -POItc, 'WOrIks .Reo-�oWtruct'j on. of'
0 v vi 11, 6 1 n cyy- Ki g h.w a Y r, o m� , MA) U n, t1a i n House to
co�unty 'I ino" h Or t h e a s
of L, a ke Orov i 11
M tv s -me.morarj.dum� d -a tip VeOev- t"16,9z IgI,6,rco�jL6rhind -this mattei-
td'd
'given 'to the C'O"mm'sal one, e rl'i 0 r. I n. Ih�rii�leetingi,51., 1�
r a
C�0,ff 'c p mmented that Ii e fol
t the memo wa el -dXPlAnatory that
they. me rely addi nq roqv�-,,, in,d,,,pAVi,0g,;on, tbel�-,ekisting tio��Ony.
'6mm, S51:00de cqd�,Tf tht$ v1p,41d n"Ot, toodh." the a r6a for more
�'�"re c, t`e aiti o k' u's 0. n d, ad d'e d t 6 a,'t - ev 0 r) tv , ho,umb, '0-$.t bf the s' rrouoding
�Q - ,ni- u
land is owned by the Forest Se�V'fce thi's could liaVe a I- ' term effec , t.
Ong
h, r e,� p'Q 0, s e, "to 4, t C
Oes' TOM 7from 0 m hi 1 s slp n er, C a me n -Z In cj, Mr. Cheff
S a i'd h'd � k n ows f no h f �'t` 6 r� f;
o ecirthquakes in 4:1) 10 a re a
Motion was made b� i5si I oner.'Muore, seconded by S1,1 q,h e r
v C OMM C"'hI'e a
Th,ebachj to uphold the appeal because th(ilppo i Oct Vif I I V� -,"b6noic,
effect on. the areat particular . ly in keeping dow,n Ial
c -
A am nz-1
T hI6 b. a a
rmd,�, H n:fdrd
e
N08 --s- C.0 moi s 9 to n e! ris, tm i f h 'A' 'd, Vjift
A, B S E r I T C OPM i s s, o n 0 r's Le CIII pllrc. G i 1,.b e tt- and
Wa�,s.o,n
TI
110� ia'cti,oh
This matter was dontinudd unti I be,
I ceMber 16 in. h,olpes,. of 6-b v
�Nj 'd O�mm i Its, i;,b n,
SL
V,. 1,11SCULANEOU
"-4b h e i� A 1 �Old
Re Vi s1th
er �f ly
11 r. Gai S br' -f ly revi e w e d h ts� v s �e n tat i -0 M, 61h Novemb,6�r I a 6�f
the
Lza I
r 0%
r tj
proposal for Ord V I OW, OY th e a n e, ral plan,
I A Vd t,h a t. -, 8, s 1,4tu-'r e is eXpd-'nt'4-dI; to tkt' L'UP4L�a � 10 _Ye ae.
le I IS th L t7;i �!S� '� * d' �sp�hert
i n - r i ' d aii use and, that this, -WbW,d;'de),itainl'%0 be
6 f influence i ' eg,ar�
flore, hqa&'-�tic than that Wlh'i 11 we 'now have..
e importance brts of, tht cities
He -r
tW t 11, oi dlnqti6�, of eff
6
14�6 d Oil t
and- Urinq etlso'ihgldjtd-ii4�i,,bh,,,�i't'I t "ag,
G T COUNTY PLANNING, �D�1it�S �I�IN
h1IN TCS Docembor 211 �?
q
orde►^ t,Ptave maximum implementation of the,GenerEI1 Plan ; t
mandatory o have cooperation from the citl0;j. � e s� suI is
that the pri ary s,fhere of fin fl uence fdr :cry qhe ted
the .second'
'Wry oleo ,1fo` y��ar�s and the ul ti f o . ri Px a s
that the Cities�dUid .ce,rtain]y:,fiare "a'�ie ;'3ptP�zrp.2QItiYAaPs, rand
tyi
On 4S to r►� arls of accompli�hlhc Chas to sad ab,oVt—the spheres,,
i
etWeen `'3 ties and e
couniY resulted in no deciiansodppratien
Mr. Gaiser commented t li
BCAG and LAFC and ghat bo tltshauldeb irusedht4 mechanisms fol* Planning
obto
ming citizens `�.artici ation
e fullest.
deci s onsade.' p Mere di s cussed bu,t no
T h it item1'a`gain be on the ages December
G ,1
DIVE;R, IN OF WELL WAT �` OM BIJT
TouNTY
Commissioner G,pleizihd a essed concern abo�,it a
Department of tJ,� ter R urces that would di vert vlateref ombi�ethe
l ] s
Butte Country for us in the southern , in
art of the state,
He Was. asked pursue the matter
resolution be sent to,, the Boardfurther and to prepare a draft of°a'
3 TPZ ZONING
h1r Lawson said that 8tato Zon-inQ Act 1258 is the. first b the
in protect lands., -for those counties thet did hot do att' ad irate state
inc,ludinq Butte tPe said that the Timber prese, ve Zoninu Will beob.
an up»Coming it6m on the Commtission s'agenda 1,n,jj�the �iear�future
He added that tite could perhaps expect other mandates tc�
a"i cl tr re in the future; "Protect
11
4.; f1TURE ACbIVDA iTEP4S
t� n.tomn
matter' hoer bes� fission -at the
Staff was instri{ct»d to 1cc. on
L to obt�il needed information
IMPACT k8poocoh�omic impact»1PJ REFERENCE T CP111T ONf1ENTALrly
ThfpACT�fZ�FO%��,
The Commi,ssi
��ri tin ththought oh i.heninatterort retosstf�fcrbdi sem..
t
rbutian tmembers N4rior to That time,
5tafi� tvas a �'so revues taF hra,�Ce every effort to i u
CoMmissioners with repot ma etc rnish
agenda nests that lrave beet loag�ceh ueda�nh, to
P
a
BUTTE COUNTY P,1,ANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES December 16 197`6
ti+ r.� , ,i C..' t j'3
dam, i n (�•� ' i, ..t
I. PLEDGE of ALLEGIANCE
'll.' ROLL t:AL14: PRESENT: Comm'lss tigers. Ca, men* zi.n.dl .Mao!re 14'°C
G,iberw,;, W :tSan,`xorid, Ciair�nian'H"anf0d
ABSENT:`
COCommissioners, Le;�,°,Clerp,, uThebact? arrd'=Staith
Also PRESENT: Jim Lawson,., J:ay,Mc,K,Peman; D,e S,iotnse►1,
Bob Gaiser, Jim SkJi lstad--Chico Ent•^.rprise
Record, and H;az-1 I llas ,. .
T11
APWfAL QE MINUrS
Minutes for December ' .. 1976 ;sere approved 4%:r stimbitted,
IV, CONTINUED ITEMS;
CONTINUED PRO De,cemuew 24,l976,
APPl A1. ,6F DUTTE CO,UNTY •ZONING BOAHti;OF �ADJUSTME:NT '
D,EC9CS10N DENYING VARIANCE
1. ;,ioda & Harold STimsoo - Vari;,nco t'o allow a 1,,79
acrea
p reel in a TM -110 (Timber Mountain
T
parcels) zone on ro erl ty 1pr ,atg,d on the west. side.
of Troy, Way approxi, 800. ftp soNtth�jof eColter Olay;
iden, tsfIed as AP 04-3l�fl6� Ma���lis 4a
fdeJicate ati� Dox 3f3y o Mag�l is stated that �he was �e6g0 rod to
p
easement When the ,property was . s:pa i t.
Yt appeared that subsequent n.egoti o,t�i ori wi th the epartnierit df
Pubs c Worsts changed the location of the easP,rontz No one froth
de,partm�0ht, ways, p ,e,sent #o speak, °b
}
Counsel Siemsen expressed the opi6ion that, stlr'Viny on the Board
of ZoningAdj_0s.tment did no.t precl)l,de &_ Grdm erviri'
as a member 61 the full, Commission -=that this teas a tiew heariho—
opera to riew evidence being presented.
Harold Stimson, tfiuite 40 acres Mr, Route tel , Dox 409-8, Chiedo stated that,he,.had bdudht
not Peters and that t�A easem0"t went thtorrgh
,tht best building sito,'on the„paroe l,, and aq�����r stalte�,1 hiis re�as.ons
iaKino, lh,d appl i cation , for etre Ya tai 'nce.: °r�n� ap,Rl�lacarit''a al.tern -
rives t,o this act,�dn, app:licati.on far a rozonigq an"d r4�quo:st ttrath.the
eas.ept# be. abaridoriod, ,I#.erebNid.f1y discusis�hit�x�
BUTtt &LINTY PLANNING CQMM18SION
December 16, 1976
MINUT S
.�,.
The hearihwas cored; go
ing i'n_ _ 0.t'o make t.h` rreces ry
r
pp
rev ��, Commis�sioner `Gilb,ert made a �mo�t'I�t?h for de ial`R 'Nfi
f.. was seconded by Commissioner Le Cleric. for Motion
AYF ES: COM tnistion ers Ca
n
menzind, Gilbert, Le C1erc, Thebach, ,t4otsiqn,
d Watters .and chafr'man Hanford,
� C;M000s4obers Ahe'bach" & Le C1erc arrived at 7;40)
u N,OkS ;co;mmi ss,i oner'i Moore
AB;�f*�V��'u: Gama ss io;nor Smith _ ' _
Nioti.,an caeried.,
T'h� applicant was appraised of the appeal period and 0rocedGre
(3
PENNING'
Marsha K. GraBo;Rezrane fr'oa/re
5
MO UPtain, 5 acre lets) to T14 20 (T �bn Mountain,
20-acre'��T6ts zo'n on ro ert
> p y 9 .�era11V,located
eas t. of Vi l as Roa�u, a "
Ponderosa Wad no'r`th of
pp"rox. ohe miye
POW stfond r:Watte�§ findinq'the prop" ,aT in' dbn�formit,y with„the
r General P'I�1," reintrodaj ed his ',potion of Tact week to 'reco�mehd app-
prow I nding further that such ac iruh would protect the'�4watershed
Nea,�ind bdrvi�
prevent fumoner i G provi n' seri: p Y , " n
si r.,.sav
tei^milled amount,• 9 t`he fax a err` �t�e-
p v O ass d
that suhstwndard _ arFels would h ve the same
e$. r♦e further!
permitted uses: t' dard
parce,l{si liis motion was second d by Gamm3ssinnat
�1oar,e
z,
AYSSi COMMSsiorlees' GIIbn'rt f Le Cler M06 re 'Watt�rs''anci Ch4irrhan
Nan1`ord.
N0 5.::' Cammissiohdr+s monzf ndi, 7"l ebadh and 11atson�,
ABSENT: Cominissiahe�Smith
lotion,, dare i ad
i
I
�td�i speak
X'Nvin a�e.Yi11��en'
Stine, �a
Charlve"►ia p a'k Chairman N'a f d�rs1oA,
Ca w,, d dcon
i_s ,taction woIrti�d bei re 'or n oe reblinr�l d f c'�r that
action, that .t'he wou p. ted to the t3aard ofupe5�^s ip^r `i=incl
9
S� 1�f set a pubic �heai in a�r%d th'�Ct i�' sh des'�f1r�.ed
she could s,ppeak at that time. i the was also appr'ai y`ad of the prazedure
for appealing this Commissions dociston to the Boa
rd,
�y
BUTTE COUNTYPLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES December 1C, 1976
u a
0
C. APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW C'nI�1MITTRE„S DECISION
< REgU I IIE
THA ENViRONMENTAI., IPS ACS. REPORT 16
./ ”! 4 3 w l a 4 G
B t' Ca n t i? °�b l i c
p ,u y �. Works> Re
op t, diction
Crowi11,e» uiocy, Mi;ghway fromounat'a o House�,�td
Ca r,n.ty lined n;ortheast,of Lake Oeo;Vi1l
Com ia;s.io,ner iia,ore µredntroduced: his motion ,af last °weelr to
m u
�,� , phal,d
,, __
,� the appea�,� 01 rahe,.�itev���,w Cammi�ttee���s.� �:s��ar�* fi�ndinn: th�ere 'Wdu1°d
be no adverse impabt, ratti�•:r,; that' ke_l flig d6wk the ,dust,
,as, result of
this reconstruction would have a berg°' ' 'ci al effect. Nis motion was
secon,,de,d by,;. Commissioner T�he,bao ,
I YE$ Commi SO one�rs Camenz' i nd, Gi libert tw�, .
GlercMOOVe,,Jhebachy,
Watson and Chairman Hanford.
NOESVl
Comiiissianc..:^,, Watters,
ABSENT. CoMmissiones Smith.
Motion carried
CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 28,_1976
D. HEARIi�G' ON DRAFT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT'
REPO>R'T,�_,FOR�
1 Staan.eS,o.G i,pevel.opmept (pro - atibn •� Subic ivis on and
.,r° , gelone frgrn �A»2� ;�;te. ��� C�� �(O.nner��l) C6mmer�oial )
and..-4y}-Re:si,dntfal) .p►"operjr located
an ,the WO?'t aide b(IT Clark Roa'4 at Nuiynell
y 76ad,,
71-43-1-5�,2
tated that' one. aaddondum had �t h prepared Ybv the ;planning
etc�1'b'vft
,ee�nar� s
Depart ohd appther, by,.Meta,rl .& .Assoc; a.to��aric± wth��.�a � t ttor"'from
Attothey Ph�11 Mace ���gardit�g draihagc, :springs, i�tc had boen added,
a1Wan ���i+�.h let e� om, the;. hara.dis,e, Reb,atia�t �bist:ri:,ct, pa;ha#s'e
Y r�r,i ga t����, n, 'Dfttr��ct e 'ha.rhdi se Fire, bop�rtm ht,.
,
he, ,,.rathor br}oy d dart ar�alyaes indio,atLA"'I th4t thr, to to the
oounty taxpay, rs v� ut d be : $17, pen y.+�ar , i`or this de�ve1op►nent. ti Com»
miss*►inner Watters and Chair -man Har�'nrd ag�►Yn e�pre'�s�d ..strr�rlg !�i'eel hgs
„T
(739) Oat the county shout provide a =i irm: data :bash and that )t he
Comm §ssion should be consc, enti out end cognizant. of the dxtra'iiohey„
- �ropor �d. ,p'ra�j ;CtS s.i)nilar o this w ,11 test the, xpaverfi.
In rd p04ss to :a�� queS'tion r ark' i h dra1llager D±ob JG
u'thengiheror
hlch Assoc#atcs, represent hO,t he a It ah't:, stated (7 ,4)-thotj�thb.
ea 1 o
cul ati bas. on ha " arirt_. bat),ed h the ,ro°po a �� l e ,-t.'bat, oi`
Of t e; Metain ad en vimc l
ot
OUTTC COUNTY PLANNING, C01411SSION
MINUTES December 16,'1976
t u b i. • S
'ChAirman Hanford called the C ommissionI's attention (78 )' to the. cbm--
ments made in the letter from Mr. Mace, Paragraph 5-4the consideration
of al ternati vos .1 s1Dch cen'ti n°ued agr�i cu tt�r`al `us'p under the,l Wi 11 i ami.
t son Adt 4p.rotectidn'� � chuisitibo of part -,af th4 ` VrOjoct for .;lubl;c park
purposes* or,�,tgutred ` .edid-ot 'on dl`, p'art?' for'.pub'l'fc park;'ourposes.
Theee. was no a�ne� °:dtiiehr thein Mr+ Guth, 46the' aUd' e'nce oto sp'eaf .
dicther• ins falvrir of or -apposed. tbp, 60' •even'to 'J question the s`u"ffi'diency
of th°is dei=t en`vi-ronmenta. irri�aoi r"epor::
y
The hearing Was `closed and motion ..mab b Commissioner Moore,' ``
seconded by Com9"�issioner Thebach� to find the draft sufficient with
,:i.ntiliusio� 6f,, Alve'; addenduim an is hma'de tdblgllt,
:AYCbii'r.,iiers
.ES: mmss
�, Camehxind ., . Gilbert, Le Cle rcr hioore, Th:ebacr''
Watson o Watters and Chairman' Hanford.
N'Ot8 No one.
ABSENT: Commissioner Smith,
�r
Mg, ti on cav�ried.
1. Stones5oh' De�iielb ineiit `CaF�hatibi� 4 rt ..
' L•td 1tb' C=" p � R�xone : from A42
' Z'(GeneNal )� Cbi�Fd1ia1 `arwd ll-� (Maximum
�b�ehsit�vwResid`e`nt�ial ) �pi`o�e�'rty ,�ocsed on the West
i d of, tie k load. of NUrah�el ly Road
� ✓ i�V". taWs+an t'ead staifi f di'h 'ahs ^hot el' ,
"lob di -0m `I6W d'ensi rathe . that` ahaga'aoll 's'hot�l a
It d i,ca te� `
Y an , Ttq .
Boob both,,, !0ginoor for thte -hp lei°1 h't aghee'd Zvi th staff that de t' ,
cities W��u`ld vahy'b°ecause qi` st r}da�rh set by tater t�rali'ty ironteoI
board, Cber'syshehthst�liblb lel b of uss��mhe igh cast to
was oncerned abbot t
the taYcpa'y I GU ,�commelt'ted That 't i , ,��d
al)oWoble" in this �*b bsal. st a csgr�.
h
Was cb 4r�b:d by the 'Porbdise Ma tbir, 41a ha'ge Stud��,` t"hai th`�t�er. rye
d
� l��a.s:alixed' habyetrs th'�►t Woul heeda'st�aio• b%k
The hoari'.i�`g �W `s r tbse`d end ri'otibn made -bye r ` oiihi tslionb0"�° Gi lbert Ito
recommend aP-ProVal finding `�Ilthat the p� opo`t a woul d. be in conform
With, t'hb eh6 R1 an. tliat X001 ti gati'in mes��" .��p+��ror~ ,te,, ,h the
bhvi wenr�ent "t impact Yrs EiaVe beak" cbvb�red' G i m��tibn rues Y � .
secoh`ded 'bY two4i l; i bw6* JtA
4UTTE COUNTY
PLANNING cOMrsraN
MINUTES December 16, 1,976' t
m' Nii1i; 1e, ; cr:e k ti, rote, 'Ch ioo,
Wayh-, �`u ��''.` '24"�'=t� E'stafes 6.4+ye; '.ch'Tco*ed °that th'e'' 1''ines
can o,raw"o inn stay drawn" so that people. Vii 11 knd'W, 'here development
At this point, Counsel comMented that the intent �,► 'y'iie ° `hien°ument'
is merely. to clarfify thq-inte.nt of - the Gdpe�al PV,ard, , , Com,m,l..ssioner
W0tt0rs' Suggested' that the matter, 6f tohtinued f`�at� °sind,y'. ir�d asked
vthy tete hoard feels the quostia'n must be dedided oW.` `Ch`6f� m` h"Aanford'
g-, that th.� legislaiti.vo history be v,-ovidvie
su geste <<
kwf Imhoff, Chico, and tai West* also of Chico als' urged that the;
Commission recommend approval, 999*82)
pA �
Larry Armstrong* 108 Cstates- , n,rive;°` Chico, `61 so rldoe� s`ent�inh
.Citizens Advisory ;,compj1t,te6*.,a�g in stated t it ,this .was, simply,
a conflict between the` land usd. i 6p and the T.a gda it'd urged'
the Commission to approve the,;amendment
Counsel commented that the Commission must se d a recammehoation to
the Roord regarding this matter.
:- Afide t1i► ee r oti ons i i 1 e+ ` .
One to rlecommond approv,11
oobithoo to rec`omm�,n`d n. 'al , end
sti.?1' fitir th 1" to `ooAti nfue the M tt'er uta ti 1's �ecember
80 --due to
the failure 'to red6i vb' a 6a`S6oj't' ( a' `es ku
�` motijn-
..,was made by
Gomm:{ss�ioger,,Camenxind,fo-r disap royal, due to the fact that lite do
nqt hcaVe a full Cdr mis ioi� and 4+ 4— tied`f on the nate, and due
to,
o the lick o t r,i i ti.6 biM th`e. pr phsdd 'change. Nis 'motion
wa§' t'ecohdedy Comihissiortor"'.Oilbet�
AYL5 Commissioners CArrenzino Gi bert, Le Clere Moore*
t4#96n,` Wdtters� and thairli .n 'H nfolzd
,'
ARSCNT Commissioners Smith & Thebach
�t motion carried:
The Commi ssi`on t s ` 0' tiohs 'as 'to'' ow �thi s m' ht�ter �W'Atds Ao� 4n�ndin0
litigation, and Just how much lai i$ involved wer6 not satisfactorily
c� :`i-a11sllered A h -,. ,
�, pI
TTS' COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
MI TCS - December 16, 1976
17 I'm' -744-,j .REZONXNCS
1 . ! 1 shy and Annie Louise rink - Rei one from "R-1 "' (Single Family
Re 1dential ) to "C-2" Neneral Co, mm€ vcial ) property located on
t'hp Northwost corner of Thomassan Lane and Skyway, identified
s
a AP 51 W7.6.1 W"�l .t ar.e .partic,ulayly described 'as;
\Bok
1R3 of'. "T110 Hassan Sub" per Map of Record in Map
14 on Pages 3C and "17 of tale Butte County Neeorder,
aining 1.6 acres, to`ro or less, Paradise.
'fr. Lawson, read st ff findings.
h sPropondnts Halsoy, ink, 8803 Skyw'ay> Paradise, said' that he bought
p`raperty in 1947 yhotr Skyway was a 2-1 ahe road with the under
a andin that a 11 pa cels fronting oh Neal would be ,business for ,
uopohents ;�o one. J.
,The hearingwas closed
seconded by Commissioner G lbert, to recommend ap der Cam�nzihd,
ketl an r►otian� made b Commissi�nova'1 of this re-
zoning g
g pro ospl f�rid- q th strrroundin properties- to be in C-`2 "
, jan
zone and the a roposa') to be �. conform�t� wi neral p
.
th the Ge
AYES: 'C',bmirlission'e1^� Ca'mehzi' d, G'ibert' Le C`lec
Watters a'nd "Chairma'ri H foIrd
wa fw n
NOLS3 No one:
ABSENT Commissioners Smith and Thebach
Motion carried.
2. Dolan R. punks = Rezone From ' �C'' y t;t5mmerc'ial)
iNighwa and
ASR CAgr� cul tral-_esid,e al) to nr�,.�:
(Gehra�l 0dmfirC7'l }
prdperty located on the uth64st corrt`er df Orbvi11e�8angor Nwy
and Lower Wyandotte Roa , identif`ied as AR 36s-113,51 more
Particularly doscribe a r
All that
Pro' arty located south of Or6ville-
Sahgo-r Hwy
and east of Lower Wyandotte Road, and bounded on the
south ant east by the following described liber
t ing at the $W corner of Lot l of Slack �O of
"Villa Verona Subllper heap of Rpcord hall -lap Na. 12
in
the Off'" O� the Butte rn'AntV Recorder., thence
7
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES December 16, 1976
no along Ghe .=sir 1 1' -n o� said Lot 1 � 367 78 rpt.
tIo t trua p a i�r ' of iaeg nnio9 1ar., he,. he, , n,r �I,esc-K1b d -
n Line th ce S 830 14' 26" E. 332.3 ft. yto t�e'',ea"s,t
line of` sa Lot 1''y thonce north along said east line
of Lot and its northerly prolongation to the south
right- of -wail � n o `, U'rovi l l e 8aingor jli ghway and the
end of the `hero 'n dose - l bed l i he .
Containing 1.71 a re, more' or, less,Orcville.
77-44-1-86
Mr. Lawson read staff findings: _
:Proponents: Mrs. Oolao bunks stat d that thi'.s
n p p a repair gairaga an,
property t h,O been
uhchcau1 dtnatlb �don7e�be.ca,u�e�of the.z.e:: i
by dotnn9.
an then t e f,. unere -erg other co merciel, ventures i -n° the area,
the s tate:d that,i th
Opeo"dnts a ' 1'^1 Pobins'an, 5230 Law r ,wyandatte Road, C�ravi 11 J, sai d
that he would no t oppote .thi s parti c 1 ar us`e i f i t were conditioned
so that the appearance would not be bjectionable to the neighborhood,
not be in favor of,
but that there were other uses permi.ted in this zoning that he would
kr. Lawsah read a ,petition con
taininv 7 names., in e
p.positinn
Theah'earing was closed and motion made by Commissioner Moore to
recomme
nd approval, finding that the,z .nvi wou.. d be tompatible , t
this' hi66ay-'d�ammercial corner a:
IT
BUTTE gOUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
MI.WUTtb 0eeember 16., 197
�' :1�, fng1 ,+ airiilY
Res dent ay to (Agri:cultural= e�i`dent�al properly
located between 12t St. and 14th,st. on the sputh side of
Grand Ave. 4escribe as:
C
V portion of "Th rmali`to Sub" per snap of record
Wall hiap No 6 n file ih the Office of the Butte
County Recorder de"scibed as
That Property located south of Grand Ave., wes.t.Of _
12th St.; east Of 14th St., and north of the center-
t
line of Sierra Ave. (now abandoned), ,
Containing 26 acre, more or less, Orovilie.
j7i'-h�• � -.999#9:5 ,
Mr,:Lawsvi, read staff findi; gs
Proponents: Mary 1hn Gilder said ti .tt tha residtn�ts of the area
circulated the zon'ioq petiti and t tainted 71% of the ow, Ers'� a
signature in order to initia this',zonin,g
Bruce Rangoon, 1551 14th Street, 0rav4l e, also spoke in favor --
asking that the residential character a the neigi�bdrhood be.- -
preseeved.,
Opponents'; Mel Wright; 155.0 Keko Street, Vehemently opposed the
proposal, stating that such action would re'v6nt him from expanding
his rabbit business at that location;
szconded b C
`ih'ere{beiri nobrie else dung to1sbpp.eaio the hearing was clkosedti
_ Motion was made by Commissioner y ommi.ssnner
g
Moore, to recommend approval of this r x?hing proposal finding
the area has traditionally been es'deritia1, that it lends
itself to residential use particular y since ,it has a s�ew6ir system
now;
AYE5� Commissioners Gilbert,4Le'.Cler�c,kN�roore' Wa'ters�,-a
and Cha'i rmah Hanford,
NOES Commissfoners Camehifnd and T h oe,61--e-o
WENT: Commissioner Smith, :)A,&_ r"'?/y,%�
'M6tihn Barrie=d,
DUTTE, COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES December 16,, 1076
C. APPEAL- OF0r aU
?yp+J�STi N`f+ S"' DUSI
�P!�RMiT�s,
1 Northern Valley Indian Healthy I'iic, ;» Use ermit
allow''a dental acid medical clinic with an admniso
trati a affice`.on prooert.y .zoned A»2` Ltd, located
on the south s4do of Yuba Ave.,, a
nRproximatel,y 100
ft. west of 7th ,Stheet identified as AP 31-237-08
(Portion)Oravllp
77-`�54-2� 395
inProponents: Daarrell Stevens, attorney for the defendant with offices
rovi ted .that there most have ►peep some sort of misundera
".tanding and the' Board of 'Coning Adjustment--that'this. is not to be
A commercia's venture, but that the services of a dodtor and & dentist `
will be available. Nd added that they do riot anticipate in excess
Of 10-15 vehicles a day and that the clinid ;yi11 not be open on
Saturday or Sunday, He presented letters by w of the nearest
regAdents commcn1t100 in favor of the 'projeet►
objectioLawsns,
read proposed condi`'ti.ans, to'which Mr Ste
ob ctio vens �voi-cod;nn
ns,
_- Ogponeritsr= C1;Vde Terror, 1760 7th Street, 0roviile; objected to,
oeoeration of additional trafffc and said that
Persons on the petition
for, the ' P ro'ect--sotrie of the persons --stand to benefit financially,
Tom`Walikerr ., - 1756 ,Ith St� rl-tree � aid he haatl,1here abo
Ili there'
and wished the area to remain residefit al ut l2 'years
,
Mrs, 011ydp Terry .aske.d that rio med1c7i11»dehta°1 buildi
in the ng be al:l;owed'
area
El tori Hartwj 9 ,172tl 7th,Sti..was concdrt- -Al about traff, c�,and
parking
as . did Wayne Douglass;," 1763 7th St; , h6t expressed t0htdrh about
so "many me. -ant of access.
f ,„ W
In rebut+al Mr; StQve%'s statdd that orie or two af. the, acces"set
to the ped that nearby eighbor$ roperty at this time could be closed_ if the'ommission
desired. He further statmenti,oned in the
first paragraph above have ,no relation to the property and ha,vd
nothing iinancia;l to gain.
There being no further comments the hearing ►vas closed (908) god
nratior, made b;y Commissioner Gi1'bert; se0ond0d by Commissioner..Natters,
for denial: His findings were that the 'area does lend itself to
residential use, and the proposal is not in conformity With the
General Pian.
AYCS_ y ,
�.; Commissioners CaMdhZind, Gilbttrty Le Clarcj, Watson, watteri,
and Chairiaao Hanford,
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
MµNUTES - December 16, 1976
NOES: Commissioner-Mrpre
ABSENT: Commissioners Smith and Thebach
Motion carried,
Chairman Hanford asked Whether the iapplicant Was aWArc otic the,
appeal procedure. Mr. Stevens stated that he Was.
D. PROTEST OF REQUIRCMENT OF BUTTE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL'REVU
COMMITTEE THAT DRAFT ENVIRONMF'NTAL IMPACT REPORT I'S REQUIRED
1. Jack McLaughlin, AP 65-2041 * Tentative. ,Parcel . Map,
A lath; West side of Schott Road, south of intersecm
tion o;'State Hwy. 32, Forest Ranch:
77-44-2-995+35
Mr. Mckeeman stated that the motion for requirement .of an ,enyiron
:mental impact repo:rt� Was. T.h" An Environmenta Report,,,
p +g he at 1 Impact .Re o
should be prepared finding proposal has the potential to 4e;grado
the quality of the environment due to the extremely steep slopes on
(f , the site -Which Would be subject to erosion, the large cats & fills
necessary to develop the property, and the close proximity of the" site
to a feeder of Little Chico. Creek and the poss ility of degradation
of the creek due to the ero'si.10n4"
Jack McLaughlin stated that this land was no different than that
nearby that hadsalweady been parceled Without an impact report and
could see no cause to require one for his propert'yi
There being noone else desiring to speak', the hearing was closed.
Lotion for denial of the appeal that an environmental impact report
is necessary was made by Commissioner batters finding that noting
the config:,ration of the land it is -eeasonable'to assume that de-
volopment will have a detrimental effect on the environment. His
10ti6n Was seconded by Commissioner Le Clerc
AYES: CommissirmaionsHanGilbert, Lo dlerc,Wa- son Waiters d
ters an
NOES0 Commissioners Camer►zind and Moore:
f ABSENT, Commissioners Smith and Thebach.
Motion carried.
The applicant was appraised of the appeal procedure