Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUP 01-25PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE #: UP 01-25 PROJECT TYPE: Use Permit APPLICANT: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 9 ADDRESS: 7112 N. Fresno Street, #460, Fresno, CA 93720 OWNER: Magalia Community Church ADDRESS: same REPRESENTATIVE: Davidson Engineering ADDRESS: , 296 Covered Bridge Road, Rogue river, Oregon 97537 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mojnted at the top of an existing 187 foot tall monopole with twelve 4 sq.ft. panel antennas mounted at the 125 foot height. PROPERTY ZONED: C-2/AR-1 (General Commercial) (Agricultural -Residential, 1 -acre parcels) LOCATED: on the east side of Old Skyway, at 137000 Old Skyway (Magalia Community Church), Magalia AP#: 066-470-033 TOWN/AREA: Magalia GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial 1. Application complete: June 28, 2001 Amount: $ 1078.00 Receipt #19636 2. Comments sent to: Development Services Director, PublicWorks Director, Environmental Health, Assessor, Building Manager, LAFCo, Town of Paradise, California Department of Forestry 3. Comments received from: 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 6. Assigned To: Stephen Betts 7. Environmental Determination: 8. 9. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 State Clearinghouse No: No Subject to Fish & Game: No Categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. -CEQA # 15061.(bx3) Other Staff Report: or"- r`/ O / Project Video: 1Jo Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: Publication Notice Written: e- -Pel-,91 Display Ad Prepared: Notices Mailed: Number of Notices: Newspaper Publication Date: P-- n B Planning Commission Hearing(s): Action taken: Special Conditions: Commission Resolution No Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Type Use Permit/Send for signature: N.O.E. / N.O.D. / APPENDIX G: C) 17. Send validated Use Permit: 18. Assessor's Memo: 19. Copy of Use Permit / Variance to Planning Technician: Ordinance No: Adopted: Fish & Game Fees Paid: Yes No 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 i AT&T Wireless Services, (Item determined to be a General Rule Exemption from environmental review), Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted at the top of an existing 187 -foot tall monopole with twelve 5 -square foot panel antennas centered 125 feet above ground level. The property is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and is located on the east side of Old Skyway, at 13700 Old Skyway (Magalia Community Church), Magalia. APN 066-470-033 (SB) (UP 01-25) Mr. Betts gave a brief summary of the project. The meeting was opened to the public. - The applicant agreed with the conditions. The hearing was closed. It was moved by Commissioner Mooney, seconded by Commissioner Marin, and unanimously carried to approve the Use Permit, UP 01-25, for AT&T Wireless Services subject to the findings and conditions listed below deleting Condition 4 and re -numbering the remaining conditions: I. The project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act, which states that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. II. Approve Use Permit 01-25 for AT&T Wireless Services, subject to the following findings and conditions found in Exhibit A: A. The proposed use of the property would not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with, or injurious to, surrounding property, or detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood, or to the general health, welfare and safety of the County because: 1. . The proposed antennas are replacing existing antennas 2. The proposed antennas would not cause an aesthetic impact because they will not increase the height of the tower and will be small in size. The new antennas will be painted the same color as the tower. 3. The proposed antennas would not cause an increase in noise, emissions, odors, or vehicle traffic. 4. A radio-frequency analysis, prepared by a radio-frequency engineer, states that the radio emissions from the proposed antennas would not exceed FCC standards. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 MINUTES ■ SEPTEMBER 27, 2001 ■ PAGE 4 0 5. The existing monopole is capable of supporting the proposed antennas. Conditions of Approval: M Planning Division The existing omni -directional antennas shall be removed within one (1) month of the activation of the new panel antennas. 2. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is date- stamped July 3, 2001, and is incorporated herein by this reference.. 3. The new antennas and mounting hardware shall be painted the same color as the existing monopole. 4. The installation of any Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. 5. No advertising or display is permitted on any Facility. 6. All Facilities shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) -pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 7. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. . 8. All Facilities must fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facilities. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring such Facilities into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. No Facility or combination of Facilities shall generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 10. If it is found that Facilities are or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facilities, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facilities. In no case shall a Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. A Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■MINUTES ■SEPTEMBER 27, 2001 ■PAGE 5 ■ OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. 11. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. 12. Traffic resulting from the installation, operation, and maintenance of Wireless Communications Facilities, must be kept to a minimum. 13. - Facilities shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. Building Division 14. Building permits required. Provide calculations from a licensed design professional verifying that the tower structure can support revised loading. Other Conditions 15. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 MINUTES ■ SEPTEMBER 27, 2001 ■ PAGE 6 ■ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTAOUNTY UNIFORM APPOCATION IrrILIL;AINJI: Agent tnionnation to lie provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME ( If applicant is different from owner an idavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ,'527-9r7- 0 er - Ybv ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) ©1 - NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) TELEPHONE —,t�,901J (f 0491 112-6A.,0414 (,S -SF ) e7evf --6 >e LOCATION OF PROJECT (Major cross streets and Address, if any) 1320o o4o W4:;e. Zy31' e-,ov GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED UERED OWNER'S NAME —FTELEPHONE ,A/ (6-33,o) ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: o4, -b M�i /"g , �y 9 5-'�Ipzl ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE ( in Square Feet or Acres EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) aQos,.a�• PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) (Check One) (Check One) 11r1e E3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION REQUESTED 0 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 10 REZONE E CE OWE USE PERMIT 0 MINOR USE PERMIT JUN' 2 8 2001 C3 VARIANCE 1:3 MINOR VARIANCE C3 ADMINISTRATIVE C3 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PLANNING 0 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 0 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP C3' WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP C3 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION 0 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION 0 CERTIFICATE OF MERGER 0 MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN 1:3 OTHER PROJECT DERCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. size of parcels.) If this application is for a land division, describe the number and ,A/ OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.) DATE: SIGNATURE: AGENT AUTHORIZATION' To Butte County, Department of Development Services; f=Je YY/,c�FG.F3".r .,r2t>/�r1 CD,oel sem) 4Ro e�o9 Print Name of Agent and Phone Number Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for �, /O A,7vly/,7y on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number 6g(,tjC,- y>o This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Print Na Signature rjn4 cikc, C6r7lMunr"��r C:ltUi C� �Arcfiitect and/or Engineer!. q Print Name of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number q'b5o� 1 Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: La Z A of Print Name Signature , a 8R. 6�s. ✓ 3TTU8 w '141 Total Amount Received: 1, 01$_ go AP Number(s) N %A Legal Description Owners Authorization ✓ . Zoning Requirements ✓ Project Description 1— Copies of plot plan Taken by _ Receipt No. Uc7 (o E.H. LD LIz . go Plan J16o.oo FD �t3 ,0p Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (An unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. --5So. 00 - v, -^-v P -2 t1 rlo_-t- CA Current fee for this application is $ k� 6 u 4 . op - y P as of 2 )17/A --%n% Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". AGENT AUTHORIZATIO To Butte County, Department of Development Services; /9T�`T YY/.�F�.F3'..t' r�^�U/fC��(' `DAy/p /y�►(L tie • �'SS'9I al5' o�oQ� Print Name of Agent and Phone Number Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for 1'�N6o19G7,09 6OM/Viv,A/ on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number y,>c - 41S.? This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) f A wf IA Print Na Signature m4 CfCt(cG� Architect and/or Engineer`. lct-t "f,-wT" ea 6•q, Ta, >41 Zai Print Name of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number ': 1 Ro (3 v x 1-7 VL 1 lE4&RA-0, GIA =Ll< Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: (P Z S of Print Name Signature , fi L �� sir Y-1 ;*U(13 iiiUd Total Amount Received: 1t o ^f $. op l/ AP Number(s) H /N Legal Description Owners Authorization ✓ Zoning Requirements ✓ Project Description �— Copies of plot plan Taken by.,_ Receipt No. \Qlv3(o E.H. ►8 S pp LD iSo - oo Plan 00.0o FD Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (An unused portion of a deposit) Will be returned upon final action. -5 S o. 00 - vr%v e rlo-,t- C5 Current fee for this application is $ 14 o u 4 . to - y P as of Z / 7 /exn � Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". ECEOVE JUN 2 8 2001 f� BUTTE COUNTY PLARING DIVISION 2. 4. • • COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed d1a21o/ Name and address of owner, and/or developer. and/or Droiect Address of project: �o Assessor's Parcel Number: Name, address, and teleph nsor: h?T0T number of person to be contacted concerning this project: List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: N®Wz 5. Existing general plan designation: 6. Existing zoning district: C t ,9_,1-_—� 7. How is land currently used? 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): /�hopi�/ FtN%�C`YY/�/% %i��is?l�C�/�/'C'�C.CrJ�/i✓6 /�IONO�bLG� Project Description: 9. Site size: r5 �,/, L"..q,g (Acres/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spacers: Full size: �1A Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes ✓ No _ 12. Proposed development schedule 07dly /� _,FoP4 L /7- 13. Associated projects AY22 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development111.4 Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: ' 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. ' If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). 0 0 Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O K YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. / 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. / 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. — ell, 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. / O WCAl to cy�-� L /.v ��/ter L rJ r/�✓% y- 0 0 Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O K • Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) ' 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals; and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects: Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one - family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set- back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signaturefor K:\FORMS\SUBMITTAL\ENV-INFO 31;?. Fj� �t?iit/L �O�i�cf vim/ r!so ? Z"i %`'t c r L rye e1v ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 3 x.. _ I ter.,;-.- USE PERMIT and MINOR USE PERMI E C E U d E COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY JUN. 2 8 2001 APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIS BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their application packet for a communications facility. Please include this checklist along with your submittal. Applicant Planner 1 • ❑ A completed, signed, Uniform Application and Environmental Information form. If the application is signed by an agent for the property owner, an agent authorization form must be submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed=by the owner or authorized agent. 2• ❑ Lid Payment of the: currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit any unused portion of the deposit will: be returned upon final action, if any remains.) (Planner advises applicant) 3. Thirty-five (35.) copies of plans which shall include a detailed sitelan drawn wn to scale. All plans shall be drawn on uniform size sheets no greater than 24" x 36". The finished plans shall be- folded to 8 %z" x 11 ". The detailed site plan must include: a. ❑ a b. ❑ 0– C. ❑ Name and address of Applicant, Engineer and/or person who prepared the plan. Property lines and lot dimensions. Assessor Parcel Number(s) and the street address. d• ❑ .- Proposed use and/or uses of the property. e• ❑ ❑ Proposed landscaping plan, if applicable. f ❑ Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvements on the property (including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, parking areas,.wells, septic tanks and leach fields). IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. I '.., g• ❑ [D**� Distances from any significant natural and constructed features of the property, . P P rty, such as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major tree stands, storm drains, bodies of water, railroads, to the property lines. h. ❑ Location of all slope banks, ponds, creeks, buttes, sloughs, rock outcroppings, natural drainage courses, irrigation canals and existing vegetation worthy of consideration for preservation, such as oak trees. i. ❑ � Any existing faults or fractures and geologic hazards. j• ❑ North arrow and scale of drawing. All plans shall be drawn to an engineering scale with the preferred scale of 1" = 20', with a north arrow preferably oriented to the ton of sheet. NN k. ❑ ❑ Building setbacks from the ultimate road right-of-way (front, rear, sides). Proposed and existing on-site driveways and/or roads. ❑ Location, height, and materials of walls and fences (sections may be required). MJ o. ❑ ❑ P. 11, ❑ q. ❑ ❑ r. ❑ ❑ All d0vveways, drawn to scale, on adjacent and across the street properties within 100 feet of the subject site. Ex s4i g curbs,utters, sidewalks and existing paving g g i p ng widths on-site or within 100, feet of the site, on adjacent and across the street properties. Nearest cross streets on both sides with plus or minus distances from subject site. Ap"dAimate location of all buildings within 1,000 feet, on adjacent properties. Existing and nearest fire hydrants. S. ❑ 1:r Access, both pedestrian and vehicular, showing service areas and points of ingress and egress. t. ❑ IT'- Elevation contours, at a minimum per USGS maps. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 2 The following additional items are required per Butte County Code Section 24-262.E. 7. ❑ ted Statement of Justification: a. ❑ Includes a description of the proposed Facility, including the type of facility being requested. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 3 4. ❑ ❑ Conceptual Grading Plan Items to be shown include: a. ❑ ❑ Natural areas to be preserved. b. ❑ ❑ Proposed cut and fill areas in contrasting colors of zipatone pattern. c• ❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contours within•100 feet of project boundaries. d• ❑ ❑ Proposed drainage and flood control facilities. e• ❑ ❑ . Erosion control measures (e.g. - slope landscaping). f ❑ ❑ Natural drainage. g• ❑ ❑ Elevations and finished contours. h. ❑ ❑ Location of retaining walls, drainage channels and existing structures. i ❑ ❑ Location, elevation and size of proposed building pads. j ❑ ❑ All plans must be clear and legible. S• ❑ ❑ One 16ty of 8 %_" x 11" transparency reduction of the detailed site plan. 6. ❑ QA vicinity map showing closest major cross streets, zoning and existing land use. The following additional items are required per Butte County Code Section 24-262.E. 7. ❑ ted Statement of Justification: a. ❑ Includes a description of the proposed Facility, including the type of facility being requested. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 3 8. a b. ❑ Height from natural grade to the top of proposed Facility. C. ❑ 13" Support equipment proposed. d. ❑ RFR/EMF and wattage output data including the number of channels. e. ❑ 0- Horizontal and vertical location coordinates. ❑ Proposed elevations of the structure and any accessory buildings, including building height ttr-and other physical dimensions, drawn to graphic scale. ❑ ❑ Visual impact assessment, 'photo montages, mock-ups as determined by the Director of Development Services or Planning Commission. The assessment shall identify any proposed trimming of vegetation that will be required for the normal operation of the Facility. Stealth technology is encouraged. 10. ❑ ❑ Mock-ups required (may be required at any time during the processing of the permit). 11. ❑ ❑ A discussion of and supporting information regarding the alternative site selection of at least a minimum of three to four other sites, if available, including colocation opportunities, and a statement as to why these alternative sites and/or colocation opportunities were rejected. 12. ❑ 12- A cofrip7ete service area map showing the entire wireless communications network of the provider's twenty (20) miles in all directions from the proposed site for the time period from the filing of the application to twelve (12) months from the filing of the application, for the purpose of visually aiding cumulative environmental analysis, with and without the proposed Facility or Facilities, showing all hand-off sites within the above specified area. 13. ❑ ❑ A giapluc depiction of the search ring and all other technical criteria used in determining the proposed Facility location. 14. ❑ Documentation which identifies failure characteristics of the Facility structure or tower and demonstrates that the site and setbacks are of adequate size to contain falling debris. 15. ❑ a Written evidence demonstrating that the selected Facility structure or tower design is as visually unobtrusive as possible, given technical and engineering considerations, which indicate what type of Facility is required to provide reasonably effective service and also the best technology and/or construction available to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness. IF rNSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 4 The use of best available technology and/or construction to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness is mandatory. 16. ❑ UK -Applicants which operate common carrier facilities (specifically, but not limited to cellular, PCS, SMR and paging service licensees of the FCC) shall provide written evidence that the applicant has provided notice to all FCC licensed wireless communication service carriers operating within the County of Butte of the plans to develop the site. 17. ❑ 13' -Evidence of a valid, current operating license or construction permit, from the FCC or, if the applicant is not a wireless communications service provider, a user operating agreement for each and every such provider to which the applicant intends to rent space on the proposed Facility. 18. ❑ ❑ A report, signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer licensed by the FCC, prepared pursuant to FCC OET 65, stating whether the maximum radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic radiation (RF/EMF) to be emitted by the proposed Facility, taking into account all other Facilities, both existing and known future Facilities, at the proposed site and adjacent properties, conforms to safety standards adopted by the FCC, if applicable. The reports prepared for Facilities shall conform to the reporting requirements set by the County and FCC OET 65 human exposure standards. The report shall also analyze the evidence provided in support of the proposed Facility location, height and radiated power, frequency, the number of channels, and all other related data and present alternatives for the location, height and radiated power, pursuant to the requirements of this section. If the proposed Facility exceeds FCC OET 65 human exposure standards, applicant shall also provide additional comprehensive technical and planning information regarding how the applicant shall protect all persons from such excessive exposure consistent with all Federal . and State requirements, and any additional County requirements. 19. El 1:1Lanscaping and paintinglans for the completed project. P P P 20. ❑ ❑ Proj c4 in Agricultural Zones (A-5 through A-160) shall, prior to submitting an application for a proposed Facility, submit a site plan of the proposed Facility to the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner for comment and send a notification letter to all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County informing them of the proposed site location and tower height. No hearing on an application for a proposed facility in any agricultural zone will be scheduled, nor shall any Administrative Permit for any such facility be issued without proof that the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner and all aerial .q agricultural applicators registered in the County have been notified, as specified herein. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 5 21. ❑ ❑ All applications for Facilities that are proposed to be located within the boundaries of any Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan or Airport Area of Influence, as adopted or designated from time to time by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission, shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division, and a copy submitted to the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission for review regarding consistency with adopted Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plans and for recommendations addressing potential impacts to air navigation within the Airport Area of Influence. The County may in its sole discretion retain an independent consultant to review either individual elements of or the entire application and advise the County at the applicant's sole'expense. Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. Signature: Applicanepresentative Signature: (2 Planner Receiving Application K .FOtL%tSSUBMITAI.'.CHECKLIS CELLUP.WPD Date T—, Date: IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 6 066470033000 066390063000 066400014000 MAGALIA COMMUNITY CHURCH YOLTON JOHN J & THERESA KIMSHEW CEMETARY DISTRICT P O BOX 165 13754 GRANADA WAY P O BOX 97 MAGALIA CA 95954 MAGALIA CA 95954 MAGALIA CA 95954 066400017000 066400018000 066400019000 IBARRA IZZIE THOMPSON SYLVIA WICHMAN RICHARD A & BETTY D 13721 OLD SKYWAY 1661 FOREST AV #6 13709 SKYWAY MAGALIA CA 95954 CHICO CA 95928-6376 MAGALIA CA 95954 066400021000 066400024000 066400025000 KRAUS RICHARD F & CAROLYN L THOMPSON SYLVIA LANDMAN TERRENCE P O BOX 215 110 TOM POLK PO BOX 671 MAGALIA CA 95954 CHICO CA 95973 MAGALIA CA 95954 066400026000 066400030000 066410001000 CLARK MELISSA WYATT JOANN SS ELLIOTT HARRY D & CAROL A 6772 RORABOUGH LN P O BOX 1036 6749 ELEY DRIVE MAGALIA CA 95954 MAGALIA CA 95954 MAGALIA CA 95954 066410002000 066410015000 066410040000 LEACH JOHN H & BARBARA A HANSON NANCY LEE THOMAS M & MARGARET A P O BOX 1050 2020 PICNIC LN 6673 SHAY LN PARADISE CA 95967 PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISE CA 95969 066410041000 066410042000 066450003000 GRANGER ELIZABETH L CUSEO JOHN E SMITH DONALD M & CLAUDIA I 6083 PATSY CT P O BOX 1013 3379 SUNVIEW ROAD PARADISE CA 95969 MAGALIA CA 95954 PARADISE CA 95969 066450011000 066470012000 066470018000 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO BINSFELD THOMAS & CRYSTAL JOHNSON HOWARD A & MAURINE R 1416 DODGE ST RM 830 3271 16TH STREET P O BOX 370 OMAHA NE 68179 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103 PARADISE CA 95967 066470019000 066470034000 066470037000 GIORDANO DAVID R & ELIZABETH BOVEE LESLIE G & IRENE R BOVEE BILLY R & FLORENCE L 1333 GLEN DELL DR P O BOX 1698 P O BOX 2063 SAN JOSE CA 95125 MAGALIA CA 95954 PARADISE CA 95967-2063 066470040000 066470041000 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES WEBER HERB BOMACTAO FELICIANO N JR 7112 NORTH FRESNO ST # 460 PO BOX 2574 P O BOX 1041 FRESNO CA 93720 PARADISE CA 95967 PARADISE CA 95967 J:\projects\Larrys\Exhibits\up0125.doc 6 z�an110 - f �`�S X00 � 0 �%O i 100 (�amzn 5Q, - ooh -190 h 0 610 q7iAaLamt r�-L 19 - 0 L h - 9 9 (D -� cam: 4,�. 0�-. 0 C, h -,i9 o T .«� . ... countg IAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net . November 1, 2001 AT&T Wireless Services 7112 N. Fresno Street, No. 460 Fresno, CA 93720 RE: Use Permit, File No. UP 01-25 Ladies & Gentlemen: The total cost for the processing of the above -referenced application is $497.00. Please sign, date, and return the enclosed claim form to this office. Once we receive the claim form, we will then process your refund in the amount of $203.00. Deposit on 6-28-01, Receipt No. 19636 $700.00 Professional Planner $265.50 Mapping $ 73.75 Clerical $157.75 Total $497.00 Refund Due $203.00 Should you have any questions, please contact this office Monday through Friday, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Nil , Clerical Support Services :jb Enclosure Date liI01/01 Ovelopment Services DeP artm t Time 11:49 am Applicant Billing Worksheet UP 01-25 * AT&T Wireless Services 7112 N. Fresno Street, No. 460 Fresno, CA 93720 In reference to UP 01-25 Rounding None' Full Precision No Last bill Last charge 11/02/01 Last payment / / Amount Date/Slip# Description 06/23/01 Diane L. / C #36226 Clerical 07/07/01 Larry P. / P #36441 Processing 07/23/01 Steve B. / P #36699 Processing 08/06/01 Steve B. / P #36731 Processing 08/20/01 Lynn R. / C #37170 Clerical 09/03/01 Lynn R. / C #36917 Clerical 09/29/01 Lynn R. / C #37469 Clerical 10/22/01 Lynn R. / C #37817 Clerical TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS Page 14 HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TOTAL 1.00 34.00' 34.00 1.25 73.75 59.00 1.00 59.00 59.00 3.50 206.50 59.00 1.00 45.00 45.00 0.50 22.50 45.00 0.50 22.50 45.00 0.75 33.. 75 45.00 $497.00 9.50 $0.00 TOTAL NEW CHARGES _$497.00 Date 11+/O1/O1 velopment* Services Departmot Time 11:49 am Applicant Billing Worksheet UP 01-25 * :AT&T Wireless Services (continued) PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 06/28/01 Deposit - Receipt #19636 (700.00) TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS NEW BALANCE New Current period (203.00) Page 15 ($700.00) TOTAL NEW BALANCE ($203.00) NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: _ Office of Planning and Research FROM: Butte County Planning Division 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 7 County Center Drive Sacramento, CA 95814 Oroville, CA 95965 X County Clerk County of Butte 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 OCT 3 200 Project Title: UP 01-25, Use Permit Assessor's Parcel No.: 066-470-033 Applicant: David Miller AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, 7112 N. Fresno Street, #460, Fresno, CA 93720 Project Location -Specific: on the east side of Old Skyway, at 137000 Old Skyway (Magalia Community Church), Magalia Project Location -City: Magalia Project Location -County: Butte Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted at the top of an existing 187 foot tall monopole with twelve 4 sq.ft. panel antennas mounted at the 125 foot height. Name of Person or Agency Approving Project: Butte County Planning Commission Exempt Status: (Check One) Ministerial (Sec. 15073) Declared Emergency (Sec. 15071(a)) Emergency Project (Sec. 15071 (b) and (c)) X Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: 15061 (b) Reasons why project is exempt:The activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.. Contact Person: Stephen Betts If filed by applicant: Telephone: (530) 538-7601 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Date Received For Filing: Signature, M. A. eleka Principal lanner j:linda\noe.nod\noe. gen ECLARATION OF FEES DUE (Cali?Whia Fish and Game Code Section 7110 NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT David Miller AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 7112 N. Fresno Street, #460 Fresno, CA 93720 FILING NO. Project Title/file number: CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION (X) A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED () A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. ( ) OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT / NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). 19943 2. () NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: M. A. Meleka Title: Principal Planner Lead Agency: Butte County. Department of Development Services Date: October 30, 2001 TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. — OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 19943 ISSUED BY n v RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC LAFCO PLANNING PUBLIC ENV. FIRE NOE/NOD F/G FEE OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM DATE NO. RECEIVED WORKS SALES HEALTH OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 19943 ISSUED BY n v } satte county LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY " DIRECTOR'S OFFICE p DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 www.buttecounty.net November 1, 2001 AT&T Wireless Services 7112 N. Fresno Street, No. 460 Fresno, CA 93720 RE: Use Permit, File No. UP 0 1 -23 Ladies & Gentlemen: The total cost for the processing of the above -referenced application is $497.00. Please sign, date, and return the enclosed claim form to this office. Once we receive the claim form, we will then process your refund in the amount of $203.00. Deposit on 6-28-01, Receipt No. 19636 $700.00 Professional Planner $265.50 Mapping $ 73.75 Clerical $157.75 Total $497.00 Refund Due $203.00 Should you have any questions, please contact this office Monday through Friday, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Jb Enclosure services County LAN D OF N A T U RAL W EA LTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 October 30, 2001 David Miller AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 7112 N. Fresno Street, #460 Fresno, CA 93720 CERTIFIED MAIL Re: Use Permit UP 01-25, AP 066-470-033, Dear Mr. Miller: Enclosed is your validated Use Permit No. UP 01-25 to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted at the top of an existing 187 foot tall monopole with twelve 4 sq.ft. panel antennas mounted at the 125 foot height. located at on the east side of Old Skyway, at 137000 Old Skyway (Magalia Community Church), Magalia. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, w 161 Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant Enc. cc: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department of Forestry USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION • a 6-2001, DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) UP 01-25 PERMIT NO. 066-470-033 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below, AT&T Wireless Services is hereby granted a Use Permit in accordance with the application filed to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted at the top of an existing 187 -foot tall monopole with twelve 5 -square foot panel antennas centered at the 125 -foot height. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 24 months of the delivery of the countersigned permit to the Permittee. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works, or their respective designee, upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a use permit has been granted is not established within two years of the date of receipt of the countersigned permit by the Permittee, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 1 i i • • Conditions of Approval: Planning Division 1. The existing omni -directional antennas shall be removed within one (1) month of the activation of the new panel antennas. 2. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is date- stamped July 3, 2001, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 3. The new antennas and mounting hardware shall be painted the same color as the existing monopole. 4. The installation of any Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. 5. No advertising or display is permitted on any Facility. 6. All Facilities shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) -pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 7. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 8. All Facilities must fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facilities. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring such Facilities into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. No Facility or combination of Facilities shall generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 10. If it is found that Facilities are or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facilities, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facilities. In no case shall a -Facility remain,in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. A Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 2 ■ • r. sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. 11. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. 12. Traffic resulting from the 'installation, operation, and maintenance of Wireless Communications Facilities, must be kept to a minimum. 13. Facilities shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. Building Division 14. ' Building permits required. Provide calculations from a licensed design professional verifying that the tower structure can support revised loading. Other Conditions 15. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that I agree, to abide fully by said conditions. c C � Dated: / p1 - Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Division permits before starting co t ction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF Assessor's Office Public Works Department ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 3 ii r MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: Butte County Assessor's Office FROM: Butte County Planning Department SUBJECT: David Miller AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, UP 01-25 DATE: October 30, 2001 Pursuant to Section 65863.5 of the Government Code, the following parcel identified as 066-470-033, was: Rezone from to zoning district. Granted a variance to X Issued a conditional Use Permit Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted at the top of an existing 187 foot tall monopole with twelve 4 sq.ft. panel antennas mounted at the 125 foot height., on the east side of Old Skyway, at 137000 Old Skyway (Magalia Community Church), Magalia, zoned C-2/AR-1 (General Commercial) (Agricultural -Residential, 1 - acre parcels) September 27, 2001 David Miller AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 7112 N. Fresno Street, #460 Fresno, CA 93720 Re: Use Permit, AP 066-470-033, UP 01-25 Dear Mr. Miller: B E A U T Y ✓�.'+r�rl va/tr LLVrIrIGI\1 JCnY1VGJ 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held September 27, 2001, your request for a Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted at the top of an existing 187 foot tall monopole with twelve 4 sq.ft. panel antennas mounted at the 125 foot height., was approved subject to the conditions listed on the enclosures. Please sign both copies and return both copies to this Division within 40 calendar days. Should you desire to appeal any of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, you must do so in writing, to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to 5:00 P.M., Monday, October 8, 2001. The appeal fee of $50.00 must be paid at that time. If you do not appeal and if there are no other appeal within the 10 calendar -day appeal period, the action of the Planning Commission is final. A Notice of Exemption (NOE) should be filed for purpose of completing the California Environmental Quality Act Requirements. The fee for filing the NOE is a $25.00 document handling fee. A check made payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $25.00 should be submitted to the Planning Division in order to complete the process. Please be aware that failure to return the signed copies within 40 calendar days will invalidate the Planning Commission's approval. Re-application to this Division would then be necessary. The Use Permit is deemed granted when the enclosures have been signed by the applicant, with the counter signature of the Chairman of the Planning Commission, and said permit is received by the applicant by registered mail. Pursuant to Section 66020 (d) (2) of the Government Code you are hereby notified that you have 90 days to register a protest challenging any fees, dedications, reservations, or exactions imposed as conditions of approval for this project. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant k: foms\approvup.frm Attachments: Zoning: C-2 (General Commercial) A. Conditions of Approval B.. General Plan/Zoning Map APN: 066-470-033 C. Vicinity Map D. Public Notice Map Location: On the east side of Old E. Site Plan Skyway, at 13700 Old STAFF COMMENT: Staff recommends approval of the Use Permit with findings and conditions. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: This is an application for a Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted on the top of an existing 187 -foot tall monopole with twelve 5 -square foot panel antennas centered 125 feet above ground level. No new ground structures are proposed nor will the existing lease area be increased in size. The proposed antennas will provide improved mobile telephone services to the public in the Paradise/Magalia/Paradise Pines area. The project parcel is developed with the 187 -foot tall monopole and a church. The monopole was permitted with Use Permit 92-94 and supports two omni -directional antennas and one microwave dish. The monopole -is painted white and is not lighted. The area where the existing monopole is located is zoned C-2 and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Commercial. Surrounding parcels are zoned C-2 and AR -1 (Agricultural Residential — 1 acre parcels). Land uses on the surrounding parcels are the church and single ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 1 ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT - SEPTEMBER 27, 2001 Applicant: AT&T Wireless Services Skyway (Magalia Community Church), File #: UP 01-25 Magalia Request: Use Permit to replace two Parcel Size: 5.8 acres omni -directional antennas mounted at the top of an Zone date: February 23, 1982 existing 187 -foot tall monopole with twelve 5- Supervisor square foot panel antennas District: 5 centered 125 feet above ground level. Project Stephen Betts, Planner: Senior Planner (538-7153) G.P.: Commercial Attachments: Zoning: C-2 (General Commercial) A. Conditions of Approval B.. General Plan/Zoning Map APN: 066-470-033 C. Vicinity Map D. Public Notice Map Location: On the east side of Old E. Site Plan Skyway, at 13700 Old STAFF COMMENT: Staff recommends approval of the Use Permit with findings and conditions. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: This is an application for a Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted on the top of an existing 187 -foot tall monopole with twelve 5 -square foot panel antennas centered 125 feet above ground level. No new ground structures are proposed nor will the existing lease area be increased in size. The proposed antennas will provide improved mobile telephone services to the public in the Paradise/Magalia/Paradise Pines area. The project parcel is developed with the 187 -foot tall monopole and a church. The monopole was permitted with Use Permit 92-94 and supports two omni -directional antennas and one microwave dish. The monopole -is painted white and is not lighted. The area where the existing monopole is located is zoned C-2 and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Commercial. Surrounding parcels are zoned C-2 and AR -1 (Agricultural Residential — 1 acre parcels). Land uses on the surrounding parcels are the church and single ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 1 ■ family dwellings. The project site is not located within an Airport Compatibility Zone, but is within the Town of Paradise's Sphere of Influence. ANALYSIS: No significant impacts are expected due to this project. The project would not result in an increase in air emissions, fugitive dust emissions, light, noise, or vehicle traffic. The proposed panel antennas would present a larger surface area that can be more readily seen then the existing omni -directional antennas, but this would not create any significant visual impacts. The large number of trees in the project area helps to shield the existing tower from view. The project will not result in an increase in the height of the tower. The new antennas and mounting hardware are required to be painted white to match the existing tower. The Town of Paradise commented on this project and is supportive of the project provided the visual impacts of the project are acceptable to County staff. The Town of Paradise further stated that improved cellular phone communications would benefit the entire Paradise-Magalia community. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the project, subject to the following findings and conditions: The project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act, which states that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. II. Approve Use Permit 01-25 for AT&T Wireless Services, subject to the following findings and conditions found in Exhibit A: A. The proposed use of the property would not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with, or injurious to, surrounding property, or detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood, or to the general health, welfare and safety of the County because: The proposed antennas are replacing existing antennas. 2. The proposed antennas would not cause an aesthetic impact because they will not increase the height of the tower and will be small in size. The new antennas will be painted the same color as the tower. 3. The proposed antennas would not cause an increase in noise, emissions, odors, or vehicle traffic. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 2 ■ 4. A radio-frequency analysis, prepared by a radio-frequency engineer, states that the radio emissions from the proposed antennas would not exceed FCC standards. 5. The existing monopole is capable of supporting the proposed antennas. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 3 ■ EXHIBIT A USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) UP 01-25 PERMIT NO. 066-470-033 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below, AT&T Wireless Services is hereby granted a Use Permit in accordance with the application filed to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted at the top of an existing 187 -foot tall monopole with twelve 5 -square foot panel antennas centered at the 125 -foot height. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 24 months of the delivery of the countersigned permit to the Permittee. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works, or their respective designee, upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or .significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a use permit has been granted is not established within two years of the date of receipt of the countersigned permit by the Permittee, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 4 ■ Conditions of Approval: Planning Division 1. The existing omni -directional antennas shall be removed within one (1) month of the activation of the new panel antennas. 2. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is date- stamped July 3, 2001, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 3. The new antennas and mounting hardware shall be painted the same color as the existing monopole. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County and any other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. 5. The installation of any Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. 6. No advertising or display is permitted on any Facility. 7. All Facilities shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) -pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 8. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 9. All Facilities must fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facilities. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring such Facilities into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 10. No Facility or combination of Facilities shall generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that Facilities are or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facilities, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facilities. In no case shall a Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. A Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 5 ■ . .0 • it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. 13. Traffic resulting from the installation, operation, and maintenance of Wireless Communications Facilities, must be kept to a minimum. 14. Facilities shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. Building Division 15. Building permits required. Provide calculations from a licensed design professional verifying that the tower structure can support revised loading. Other Conditions 16. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Division permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF Assessor's Office Public Works Department ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 6 ■ 066-470-033 A T & T WIRELESS v Vicinity Map Project Location ga 00 71 !Los Ami Lane Peak C toy Up01-25 066-470-033 A T & T WIRELESS a P TM -20 WAWMEM d TM -4O p R -C D TPZ-160 500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Feet BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMNIISSION Applicant: AT&T Wireless Services Owner: Magalia Community Church Hearing Date: September 27, 2001 @ 9:30 a.m. Existing Zone: C-2 & AR-1(Agricultural Residential, l ac. min) N Supervisorial RequestUse Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted at the top of an existing 187 foot monopole wi District # 5 twelve 4 sq.$. panel antennas mounted at 125 foot height. Assessor Parcel No: 066-470-033 Me: UP 01-25 k r August 27, 2001 David Miller AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 7112 N. Fresno Street, #460 Fresno, CA 93720 Re: Use Permit, AP 066-470-033, UP 01-25 Dear Mr. Miller: c ,gaffe Co L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH A N D BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted at the top of an existing 187 foot tall monopole with twelve 4 sq.ft. panel antennas mounted at the 125 foot height. on the east side of Old Skyway, at 137000 Old Skyway (Magalia Community Church), Magalia. Should you have any concerns with the report or conditions of approval, please contact us in advance of the meeting so that we may work together to resolve your concerns. A public hearing has been set for September 27, 2001, at 9:30 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the. applicant or their authorized representative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts of this office at 538-7601, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant Enc. cc: Davidson Engineering j:\wpdocs\pc1ts\schedu1e.mrg Attachments: Zoning: C-2 (General Commercial) A. Conditions of Approval B.. General Plan/Zoning Map APN: 066-470-033 C. Vicinity Map D. Public Notice Map Location: On the east side of Old E. Site Plan Skyway, at 13700 Old STAFF COMMENT: Staff recommends approval of the Use Permit with findings and conditions. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: This is an application for a Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted on the top of an existing 187 -foot tall monopole with twelve 5 -square foot panel antennas centered 125 feet above ground level. No new ground structures are proposed nor will the existing lease area be increased in size. The proposed antennas will provide improved mobile telephone services to the public in the Paradise/Magalia/Paradise Pines area. The project parcel is developed with the 187 -foot tall monopole and a 'church. The monopole was permitted with Use Permit 92-94 and supports two omni -directional antennas and one microwave dish. The monopole is painted white and is not lighted. The area where the existing monopole is located is zoned C-2 and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Commercial. Surrounding parcels are zoned C-2 and AR -1 (Agricultural Residential — 1 acre parcels). Land uses on the surrounding parcels are the church and single ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 1 ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT - SEPTEMBER 27, 2001 Applicant: AT&T Wireless Services Skyway (Magalia Community Church), File #: UP 01-25 Magalia Request: Use Permit to replace two Parcel Size: 5.8 acres omni -directional antennas mounted at the top of an Zone date: February 23, 1982 existing 187 -foot tall monopole with twelve 5- Supervisor square foot panel antennas District: 5 centered 125 feet above ground level. Project Stephen Betts, Planner: Senior Planner (538-7153) G.P.: Commercial Attachments: Zoning: C-2 (General Commercial) A. Conditions of Approval B.. General Plan/Zoning Map APN: 066-470-033 C. Vicinity Map D. Public Notice Map Location: On the east side of Old E. Site Plan Skyway, at 13700 Old STAFF COMMENT: Staff recommends approval of the Use Permit with findings and conditions. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: This is an application for a Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted on the top of an existing 187 -foot tall monopole with twelve 5 -square foot panel antennas centered 125 feet above ground level. No new ground structures are proposed nor will the existing lease area be increased in size. The proposed antennas will provide improved mobile telephone services to the public in the Paradise/Magalia/Paradise Pines area. The project parcel is developed with the 187 -foot tall monopole and a 'church. The monopole was permitted with Use Permit 92-94 and supports two omni -directional antennas and one microwave dish. The monopole is painted white and is not lighted. The area where the existing monopole is located is zoned C-2 and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Commercial. Surrounding parcels are zoned C-2 and AR -1 (Agricultural Residential — 1 acre parcels). Land uses on the surrounding parcels are the church and single ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 1 ■ family dwellings. The project site is not located within an Airport Compatibility Zone, but is within the Town of Paradise's Sphere of Influence. ANALYSIS: No significant impacts are expected due to this project. The project would not result in an increase in air emissions, fugitive dust emissions, light, noise, or vehicle traffic. The proposed panel antennas would present a larger surface area that can be more readily seen then the existing omni -directional antennas, but this would not create any significant visual impacts. The large number of trees in the project area helps to shield the existing tower from view. The project will not result in an increase in the height of the tower. The new antennas and mounting hardware are required to be painted white to match the existing tower. The Town of Paradise commented on this project and is supportive of the project provided the visual impacts of the project are acceptable to County staff. The Town of Paradise further stated that improved cellular phone communications would benefit the entire Paradise-Magalia community. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the project, subject to the following findings and conditions: I. The project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act, which states that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. H. Approve Use Permit 01-25 for AT&T Wireless Services, subject to the following findings and conditions found in Exhibit A: A. The proposed use of the property would not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with, or injurious to, surrounding property, or detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood, or to the general health, welfare and safety of the County because: 1. The proposed antennas are replacing existing antennas. 2. The proposed antennas would not cause an aesthetic impact because they will not increase the height of the tower and will be small in size. The new antennas will be painted the same color as the tower. 3. The proposed antennas would not cause an increase in noise, emissions, odors, or vehicle traffic. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 2 ■ • 0 4. A radio-frequency analysis, prepared by a radio-frequency engineer, states that the radio emissions from the proposed antennas would not exceed FCC standards. The existing monopole is capable of supporting the proposed antennas. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 3 ■ EXHIBIT A USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) UP 01-25 PERMIT NO. 066-470-033 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below, AT&T Wireless Services is hereby granted a Use Permit in accordance with the application filed to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted at the top of an existing 187 -foot tall monopole with twelve 5 -square foot panel antennas centered at the 125 -foot height. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the .basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 24 months of the delivery of the countersigned permit to the Permittee. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works, or their respective designee, upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees, paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a use permit has been granted is not established within two years of the date of receipt of the countersigned permit by the Permittee, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 4 ■ Conditions of Approval: Planning Division 1. The existing omni -directional antennas shall be removed within one (1) month of the activation of the new panel antennas. 2. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is date- stamped July 3, 2001, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 3. The new antennas and mounting hardware shall be painted the same color as the existing monopole. 4. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County and any other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. 5. The installation of any Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. 6. No advertising or display is permitted on any Facility. 7. All Facilities shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) -pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 8. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 9. All Facilities must fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facilities. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring such Facilities into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 10. No Facility or combination of Facilities shall generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that Facilities are or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facilities, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facilities. In no case shall a Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. A Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 5 ■ 6 it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. 13. Traffic resulting from the installation, operation, and maintenance of Wireless Communications Facilities, must be kept to a minimum. 14. Facilities shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. Building Division 15. Building permits required. Provide calculations from a licensed design professional verifying that the tower structure can support revised loading. Other Conditions 16. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Division permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF Assessor's Office Public Works Department ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CONMSSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 6 ■ REVISED BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing is published for Thursday, September 27, 2001, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following item: ITEM DETERMINED TO BE A GENERAL RULE EXEMPTION FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 9:30 a.m. - AT&T Wireless Services, Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted at the top of an existing 187 -foot tall monopole with. twelve 5 -square foot panel antennas centered 125 feet above ground level. The property is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and is located on the east side of Old Skyway, at 13700 Old Skyway (Magalia Community Church), Magalia. APN 066-470-033 (SB) (UP 01-25) The above mentioned application and map are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Development Services Department, Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. For information call: (530) 538-7601 (Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) Comments may be submitted in writing at any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. Upon action taken by the Planning Commission on the project an appeal may be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. The appeal period is 10 days. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION To be published in the Paradise Post on Thursday, August 30, 2001 • Betts, Steve From: Wilson, Randy Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 1:20 PM To: MacKenzie, Robert Cc: Betts, Steve Subject: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers -.. AT&T is seeking to replace some antenna on four of its existing facilities. • Section 24-262(c)(5) allows for repair or replacement of lawfully established Facility, so long as the repair or replacement does not involve modifications to the Facility which add height, changes the appearance, in a visually or physically obtrusive manner, or increases the effective radiated power. Likely the effective radiated power will increase. There may be. so debate or the change being physically obtrusive. Should the determination be made that a permit is needed there arises an issue that I do not think we considered. That is just what type of permit will be needed? We have not identified the specific zones yet. My concern is that we may not have thought through how to address an upgrade to an existing antenna completely and that there may be a hole in the ordinance in this regard. Further if we are to require a permit the permit type would seem have the component of a public hearing, or else why require a permit Example: The Facility is in an A-10 zone. If the action is a collocation then the permit type is a minor use permit. Is the replacement a collocation? Section 24-262(f)(3) says, "Additional Facilities attached below the topmost existing Facility array,...". Perhaps Section 24-262(f)(5) May apply. Let me know your thoughts. Randy Betts, Steve From: Wilson, Randy Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 3:57 PM To: Betts, Steve Subject: FW: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers -----Original Message ----- From: MacKenzie, Robert Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 3:44 PM To: Wilson, Randy Subject: RE: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers I don't think there's a hole in the ordinance, unless you mean that when a repair or replacement will increase any of the factors in 24-262(c)(5), it doesn't make it any easier to get a permit the second time around. That's just fine with me. I doubt the companies will be happy about it though. If the any of the factors in 24-262(c)(5) will increase, I think we should go by the parameters of the ordinance, in terms of which zone/setback area the repair/replacement will occur in and what type of facility will be placed there, when deciding what type of permit is required. If a repair or replacement will not result in any additional hardware being installed on an existing tower or mono pole and the antenna replacement will not be any more powerful or visually obtrusive, then no permit is required. I don't think this is a problem. I think you are correct, however, that 24-262(f)(3) applies if the company is putting another antenna on an existing monopole or tower. Further, if the company wants to install an additional facility within an existing antenna farm, then 24-262(f)(5) applies. However, if the company wants to repair/replace an existing antenna on a utility pole and none of the factors in 24-262(c)(5) will increase, then no permit is required. We should determine whether we have sufficient information on existing facilities to determine exactly what their height and appearance is, so that if a company decides they don't want to get a permit, even though they will increase height or visual obtrusiveness, we have the evidence to back up any claims we or the neighbors have that height or visual obtrusiveness has changed with the repair/replacement. Do we have photos of all existing facilities? We don't need to worry about utility pole mounted facilities, but it's probably a good idea to photograph all existing monopoles/towers. Do you have students who volunteer for DDS? Maybe they could work on a cataloguing project like this. Is this helpful or were you thinking of another deficiency in the ordinance? -----Original Message ----- From: Wilson, Randy Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 1:20 PM To: MacKenzie, Robert Cc: Betts, Steve Subject: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers Rob, AT&T is seeking to replace some antenna on four of its existing facilities. Section 24-262(c)(5) allows for repair or replacement of lawfully established Facility, so long as the repair or replacement does not involve modifications to the Facility which add height, changes the appearance, in a visually or physically obtrusive manner, or increases the effective radiated power. Likely the effective radiated power will increase. There may be so debate or the change being physically obtrusive. Should the determination be made that a permit is needed there arises an issue that I do not think we considered. That is just what type of permit will be needed? We have not identified the specific zones yet. My concern is that we may not have thought through how to address an upgrade to an existing antenna completely and that there may be a hole in the ordinance in this regard. Further if we are to require a permit the permit type would seem have the component of a public hearing, or else why require a permit Example: The Facility is in an A-10 zone. If the action is a collocation then the permit type is a minor use permit. Is the replacement a collocation? Section 24-262(f)(3) says, "Additional Facilities attached below the topmost existing Facility array,...". Perhaps Section 24-262(f)(5) May apply. Let me know your thoughts Randy Betts, Steve From: Wilson, Randy Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 8:03 AM To: MacKenzie, Robert Cc: Betts, Steve Subject: RE: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers I think that they will need some sort of permit. Where I think the ordinance may not be clear is just what kind of permit. The table addresses new facilities, including collocation very well. We perhaps need to make a finding that to replace an antenna with new technology, as with the 4 proposals, is substantially like initiating a new facility. While there may be no new tower, there are different visual and potential health risks (different radiated power) associated with the replacement, which is not to repair, but to upgrade. AT&T has inquired as to how to proceed and has given up some photos of the towers affected and simulations of the visual differences. I think that, for the most part, the providers will comply. . Randy -----Original Message ----- From: MacKenzie, Robert Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 3:44 PM To: Wilson, Randy Subject: RE: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers I don't think there's a hole in the ordinance, unless you mean that when a repair or replacement will increase any of the factors in 24-262(c)(5), it doesn't make it any easier to get a permit the second time around. That's just fine with me. I doubt the companies will be happy about it though. If the any of the factors in 24-262(c)(5) will increase, I think we should go by the parameters of the ordinance, in terms of which zone/setback area the repair/replacement will occur in and what type of facility will be placed there, when deciding what type of permit is required. If a repair or replacement will not result in any additional hardware being installed on an existing tower or mono pole and the antenna replacement will not be any more powerful or visually obtrusive, then no permit is required. I don't think this is a problem. I think you are correct, however, that 24-262(f)(3) applies if the company is putting another antenna on an existing monopole or tower. Further, if the company wants to install an additional facility within an existing antenna farm, then 24-262(f)(5) applies. However, if the company wants to repair/replace an existing antenna on a utility pole and none of the factors in 24-262(c)(5) will increase, then no permit is required. We should determine whether we have sufficient information on existing facilities to determine exactly what their height and appearance is, so that if a company decides they don't want to get a permit, even though they will increase height or visual obtrusiveness, we have the evidence to back up any claims we or the neighbors have that height or visual obtrusiveness has changed with the repair/replacement. Do we have photos of all existing facilities? We don't need to worry about utility pole mounted facilities, but it's probably a good idea to photograph all existing monopoles/towers. Do you have students who volunteer for DDS? Maybe they could work on a cataloguing project like this. Is this helpful or were you thinking of another deficiency in the ordinance? -----Original Message ----- From: Wilson, Randy Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 1:20 PM To: MacKenzie, Robert Cc: Betts, Steve Subject: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers Rob, AT&T is seeking to replace some antenna on four of its existing facilities. Section 24-262(c)(5) allows for repair or replacement of lawfully established Facility, so long as the repair or replacement does not involve modifications to the Facility which add height, changes the appearance, in a visually or physically obtrusive manner, or increases the effective radiated power. Likely the effective radiated power will increase. There may be so debate or the change being physically obtrusive. Should the determination be made that a permit is needed there arises an issue that I do -not think we considered. That is just what type of permit will be needed? .We have not identified the specific zones yet. My concern is that we may not have thought through how to address an upgrade to an existing antenna completely and that there may be a hole Rnthe ordinance in this regard. Further if we fto require a permit the permit type would seem have the component of a public hearing, or else why require a permit Example: The Facility is in an A-10 zone. If the action is a collocation then the permit type is a minor use permit. Is the replacement a collocation? Section 24-262(f)(3) says, "Additional Facilities attached below the topmost existing Facility array,...". Perhaps Section 24-262(f)(5) May apply. Let me know your thoughts. Randy Betts, Steve From: Wilson, Randy Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 11:42 AM To: Betts, Steve Subject: FW: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers Steve, Here is the latest trail of dialog with Rob. Do you think we have settled on the type of permit. I tried to call Rob, but he is at lunch. I will try later. I welcome your input before I talk to him. thanks Randy -----Original Message ----- From: MacKenzie, Robert Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 10:19 AM To: Wilson, Randy Subject: RE: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers I would avoid using the collocation section on a repair/replacement. I see the collocation section as applying when another antenna is added to an existing facility, increasing the number of antennas on the facility. I think the table should be used on a repair/replacement. This interpretation may be criticized, because arguably it is a more difficult process to replace a facility with one which is only slightly more visually obtrusive than to add a new antenna and make a facility much more visually obtrusive. However, the ordinance seems slightly more weighted toward health concerns. This makes perfect sense if you consider it in terms of very powerful facilities, like TV and/or radio antennas. Potential health risks you can't see need to be more carefully considered than visual obtrusiveness issues. Further, I think this is just the way that the ordinance is written. What do you think? Do we have a potential inconsistency because a collocation is likely to greatly increase power output? Maybe we should ask Jonathon this question. As a general rule, however, I don't think collocations will increase power output that much, because they will be mainly for cellular service and cellular towers just don't put out that much power. -----Original Message ----- From: Wilson, Randy Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 10:02 AM To: MacKenzie, Robert Subject: RE: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers We agree on this point. Now for the type of permit. I would assume we use the table. But, is this a collocation? This is where I feel we should made a specific reference to the type of permit. Randy -----Original Message ----- From: MacKenzie, Robert Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 9:59 AM To: Wilson, Randy Subject: RE: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers I agree. Residents of the neighborhood are likely to be sensitive to any differences in appearance, however small. With regard to power output, I think it is always good to get as much relevant information as possible, so if a dispute develops, we have evidence. Since the ordinance is written in a way that allows your dept. discretion concerning how much information to request, it is probably better to err on the side of too much, rather than too little. Any community activists who become interested in these projects will likely be interested in potential health effects and will be critical of your department if you cannot answer questions concerning power output. -----Original Message ----- From: Wilson, Randy Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 9:51 AM To: MacKenzie, Robert Subject: RE: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers The new digital antennas look different than the old antennas as they pr rude from the tower in a circular manner rather than a whip antenna. This could be a visual impact. Perhaps we should also request information on the power output that includes a comparison analysis of the power output from the old to new and then make a determination. We may, however, conclude the difference in the visual will trip the requirement for a permit as you indicate. I think we could be consistent with just the visual, but I also think we should substantiate the power output changes in making our determination. -----Original Message ----- From: MacKenzie, Robert Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 9:09 AM To: Wilson, Randy Subject: RE: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers If the visual impact or the power output increases, then it's not an exempt repair/replacement. We can be pretty tight on concluding that visual impact increases when the appearance is different. However, I don't think we should go beyond the parameters of the ordinance if it is just new technology and none of the factors in 24-262(c)(5) will increase. If we do require permits for simply new technology when none of the factors in 24-262(c)(5) will increase, then even though we may get initial cooperation from some companies, sooner or later a company will refuse to cooperate, and then the ones which did initially, will be upset. Further, we want to encourage new technology which reduces visual obtrusiveness when it's possible under the ordinance. We probably don't need to worry, because power output will probably usually increase, due to the predominance of digital service. What do you think? -----Original Message ----- From: Wilson, Randy Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 8:03 AM . To: MacKenzie, Robert Cc: Betts, Steve Subject: RE: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers I think that they will need some sort of permit. Where I think the ordinance may not be clear is just what kind of permit. The table addresses new facilities, including collocation very well. We perhaps need to make a finding that to replace an antenna with new technology, as with the 4 proposals, is substantially like initiating a new facility. While there may be no new tower, there are different visual and potential health risks (different radiated power) associated with the replacement, which is not to repair, but to upgrade. AT&T has inquired as to how to proceed and has given up some photos of the towers affected and simulations of the visual differences. I think that, for the most part, the providers will comply. Randy -----Original Message ----- From: MacKenzie, Robert Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 3:44 PM To: Wilson, Randy Subject: RE: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers I don't think there's a hole in the ordinance, unless you mean that when'a repair or replacement will increase any of the factors in 24-262(c)(5), it doesn't make it any easier to get a permit the second time around. That's just fine with me. I doubt the companies will be happy about it though. If the any of the factors in 24-262(c)(5) will increase, I think we should go by the parameters of the ordinance, in terms of which zone/setback area the repair/replacement will occur in and what type of facility will be placed there, when deciding what type of permit is required. If a repair or replacement will not result in any additional hardware being installed on an existing tower or mono pole and the antenna replacement will not be any more powerful or visually obtrusive, then no permit is required. I don't think this is a problem. I think you are correct, however, that 24-262(f)(3) applies if the company is putting another antenna on an existing monopole or tower. Further, if the company wants to install an additional facility within an existing antenna farm, then 24-262(f)(5) applies. However, if the company wants to repair/replace an existing antenna on a utility pole and none of the factors in 24-262(c)(5) will increase, then no permit is required. We should determine whether we have sufficient information on existing facilities to determine exactly what their height and appearance is, so that if a company decides they don't want to get a permit, even though they will increase height or visual obtrusiveness, we have the evidence to back up any claims we or the neighbors have that height or visual obtrusiveness has changed with the repair/replacement. Do we have photos of all existing 4 facilities? Adon't need to worry about utility pole mounteafacilities, but it's probably a good idea to photograph all existing monopoles/towers. Do you have students who volunteer for DDS? Maybe they could work on a cataloguing project like this. Is this helpful or were you thinking of another deficiency in the ordinance? -----Original Message ---- From: Wilson, Randy Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 1:20 PM To: MacKenzie, Robert Cc: Betts, Steve Subject: Upgrade of antenna on existing cell towers Rob, AT&T is seeking to replace some antenna on four of its existing facilities Section 24-262(c)(5) allows for repair or replacement of lawfully established Facility, so long as the repair or replacement does not involve modifications to the Facility which add height, changes the appearance, in a visually or physically obtrusive manner, or increases the effective radiated power. Likely the effective radiated power will increase. There may be so debate or the change being physically obtrusive. Should the determination be made that a permit is needed there arises an issue that I do not think we considered. That is just what type of permit will be needed? We have not identified the specific zones yet. My concern is that we may not have thought through how to address an upgrade to an existing antenna completely and that there may be a hole in the ordinance in this regard. Further if we are to require a permit the permit type would seem have the component of a public hearing, or else why require a permit Example: The Facility is in an A-10 zone. If the action is a collocation then the permit type is a minor use permit. Is the replacement a collocation? Section 24-262(f)(3) says, "Additional Facilities attached below the topmost existing Facility array,...". Perhaps Section 24-262(f)(5) May apply. Let me know your thoughts. Randy BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, UP 01-25 DATE: July 5, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet.is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mojnted at the ton of an existing 187 foot tall monopole with twelve 4 sq.ft. panel antennas mounted at the 125 foot height on property zoned C-2/AR-I(General Commercial) (Agricultural -Residential, 1 -acre parcels) located on the east side of Old Skyway, at 137000 Old Skvwayy (Mag_alia Community Church), Magalia, identified as APN 066-470-033. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON August 23, 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN July 19,2001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): L4gm !;yE�oPr+neNs' N 0 Co ►�n►h�tvrs — bib* Co,i a) r?-ioi-tJ By: k n. IAcq-a> Date: 8^ 1 o -- zoo I RECEIVED 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 J U L 0 5 2001 t,QUN r Y CIF BUTTE Lk%'D UVELOPMENT DN.. `s 07/18/2001 14:39 TOWN OF PARADISE 4 5387785 NO.940 9002 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: TOWN OF PARADISE FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, UP 01-25 DATE: Jnly 5, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any, and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated heating date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time $arae given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Pemir to =lace two omni -directional antermas mounted at the toe of an e2d ting, 97 foot tall_ monFole widt twelve 4 sq ft panel antenna- ==W at the 125 foot heigbl. on property zoned C-21�1(C neral Commercial ����jnl�LAe.Sjf�P,nfial„]-acr par a cl located on the east -side ofOl. a Ski waw at 137000 Old Slot CHagalia C o mnuniti Church) Magalia, identified as APN OftAI o33_ Supervisorial District No -1 THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - _ DEYELOPMEM REYLEW CQA0, FE ON 6u U -.;t 2�0 COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN Jul_; 19- 2001- If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment CONIIv ENNTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): PItQ N e C'Www&vAA%tATi a LA. N t'C" "Ch: i ►K.E -PAQ&-D,56—PA(61AL%A «wkNve%]N. 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530.538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 • BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION LAFC® TO: LAFCo FROM: Butte County Planning Division Jul, RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: AT&T WIRELESS S} g§, i7alAiia DATE: July 5, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for tall monopole with twelve 4 sq,tt. panel antennas mounted at the 125 foot height on property zoned C-2/AR-1(,CTeneral Commercial) (Agricultural -Residential, 1-acrean reels) located on the east side of Old Skyway, at 137000 Old Skyww (Mag_alia Community Church), Ma glia, identified as APN 066-470-033. Supervisorial District No. 1. 093 D19 THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON August 23, 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN July 19, 2001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): K.•nr%+ew. Ce.s���... By: _ � �c,r, Date: t 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 E • BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DMSION TO: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, UP 01-25 DATE: July 5, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify' particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mointed at the top of an existing 187 foot tall monopole with twelve 4 s4 ft panel antenna-, mounted at the 125 foot height- on property zoned C-2/AR-IWn .ral Commercial) (Agricultural -Residential, 1-acrean reels) located on the east side of Old SIQM y, at 13700o Old 4kyw (Magalia Community Ch ur , Magalia, identified as APN 066-470-033. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON August 23, 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN July 19.2001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional BY: Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 �•r J U L 6''0170 2 01 BUTTE COUNTY 011IRN Chico, Califomia DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ✓ , LOC46 PLANNING DIVISION 5 TO: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FROM: Butte County Planning Division 8 RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application; - T&T WIRELESS'SERVICES,' UP -01: DATE: July 5, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mojnted at the top of an existing 187 foot tall monopole with twelve 4 sq.ft. panel antennas mounted at the 125 foot height on property zoned C-2/AR-1(General Commercial) (Agricultural -Residential, 1-acrean rcels) located on the east side of Old Skyway, at 137000 Old Skyway 4(lylag,alia o m nity Church), Magal'ia, identified as APN=066=470=033 Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON August 23, 001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN July 19, 2001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): Lin Date: `F 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: BUILDING MANAGER FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, UP 01-25 DATE: July 5, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas monted at the top of an existing 187 foot tall monopole with twelve 4 sq.ft. panel antennas mounted at the 125 foot height. on property zoned C-2/AR- 1 (General Commercial) (Agricultural -Residential, 1-acrean reels) located on the east side of Old Skyway, at 137000 Old SICMay (Magalia CommunityChurch),Magalia, identified as APN 066-470-033. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON August 23, 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN July 19, 2001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): PC-RMITS 9CzVU/ ' -b . ?/ID(// .DE 04W44A 7?vAI S FAcA4 4 U CCW SCS AES/ 4itJ PlzvFvs S/ oN R+L 4IC-ro P,tI G 7,014&Z 7r UcruA By: ✓�1 Date: % f 0 / 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT APPLICANT: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES DATE: July 5, 2001 AGENT: Davidson Engineering APN: 066-470-033 FILE #: UP 01-25 PLANNER: Stephen Betts PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mojnted at the top of an existing 187 foot tall monopole with twelve 4 sq.ft. panel antennas mounted at the 125 foot height. Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS H.BUILDING PERMITS ✓ 1. Building Permits Required. Prepare L4sets of construction plans and make an application for permit. Construction shall comply with federal, state, and local regulations. Plans shall be prepared, sealed and signed by a California Licensed Architect or Registered Engineer for non-residential buildings and certain residential buildings. 2. Proposed improvements constitute a "change in use" or "change in the character of use" as stated in the building code. Improvement plans shall incorporate all code -required elements for the new use. 3. All structures shall be made accessible to the disabled. Disabled accessible parking and an accessible path of travel shall be provided. 4. Proposed improvements shall comply with Title 24 energy conservation regulations. Appropriate compliance forms (two sets) shall be submitted indicating compliance with those standards. 5. Proposed improvements shall comply with Butte County Code and FEMA Flood Hazard Prevention regulations. A FEMA Elevation Certificate, prepared by a qualified professional, shall be completed and submitted with improvement plans for the Building Division. 6. Proposed improvements shall comply with recorded map conditions applicable to construction. 7. Proposed improvements shall comply with Public Resources Code 4290 Fire Safe Construction standards. 8. Development fees for the proposed residential or non-residential improvements shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. The fees shall be those in effect at time of application, and shall include, but not be limited to, School Fees, Park and Recreation District fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, Permit and Plan Check fees, and Fire Protection Fees. I. EXISTING STRUCTURES Comply with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended new use of the building(s) or the existing building(s) shall be demolished. 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 'S. A Wireless • Base Station Site N60001 13700 Old Skyway • Magalia, California Statement of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers The firm of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers, has been retained by AT&T Wireless, a cellular telecommunications carrier, to evaluate proposed modifications to an existing base station located at 13700 Old Skyway in Magalia, California (Site No. C001), for compliance with appropriate guidelines limiting human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. Prevailing Exposure Standards The U.S. Congress requires that the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") evaluate its actions for possible significant impact on the environment. In Docket 93-62, effective October 15, 1997, the FCC adopted the human exposure limits for field strength and power density recommended in Report No. 86, "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields," published in 1986 by the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements ("NCRP"). A summary of the exposure limits contained in NCRP-86 is shown in Figure 1. Separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter limits generally five times more restrictive. The more recent Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ("IEEE") Standard C95.1-1999, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz," includes nearly identical exposure limits. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. The most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to radio frequency ("RF" energy for several personal wireless services are as follows: Wireless Telecommunications Service Apnrox.Frequency Occupational Limit Public Limit Personal Communication ("PCS") 1,950 MHz 5.00 mW/cm2 1.00 mW/cm2 Paging Services 900 3.00 0.60 Cellular Telephone 870 2.90 0.58 Specialized Mobile Radio 855 2.85 0.57 [most restrictive frequency range] 30-300 1.00 0.20 General Facility Requirements Base stations typically consist of two distinct parts: the electronic transceivers (also called "radios" or "cabinets") that are connected to the traditional wired telephone lines, and the passive antennas that send the wireless signals created by the radios out to be received by individual subscriber units. The transceivers are often located at ground level and are connected to the antennas by coaxial cables about 1 inch thick. Because of the short wavelength of the frequencies assigned by the FCC for wireless services, the antennas require line -of -sight paths for HEHAMMETT & EDISON, INC. 010705-CO01 CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO Page 1 of 3 4 AM Wireless Base Station Site N00001 13700 Old Skyway • Magalia, California their signals to propagate well and so are installed at some height above ground. The antennas are designed to concentrate their energy toward the horizon, with very little energy wasted toward the sky or the ground. Along with the low power of such facilities, this means that it is generally not possible for exposure conditions to .approach the maximum permissible exposure limits without being physically very near the antennas. Computer Modeling Method The FCC provides direction for determining compliance in its Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC -Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation," dated August 1997. Figure 2 attached describes the calculation methodology, which reflects the fact that the power level from an energy source decreases with the square of the distance from the source (the "inverse square law"). The computerized technique for modeling particular sites is also described, and the conservative nature of this method for evaluating expected exposure conditions has been verified by numerous field tests. Site and Facility Description Based upon information provided by AT&T, it is proposed to mount four Swedcom Model SC10013-Din directional panel antennas in place of -three Allen Telecom Model DB809T3 omnidirectional antennas on top of a tall steel pole sited at 13700 Old Skyway in Magalia. The antennas would be mounted at an effective height of about 125 feet above ground and would be oriented in pairs towards 185°T and 2900T. The maximum effective radiated power in any direction would be 550 watts, representing 22 channels operating simultaneously at 25 watts each. There are no other wireless communications facilities located in the vicinity. Study Results The maximum ambient RF level anywhere at ground level due to the proposed AT&T operation is calculated to be 0.0000014 mW/cm2, which is 0.00024% of the applicable public limit. It should be noted that even this result includes several "worst-case" assumptions and therefore is expected to overstate actual power density levels. No Recommended Mitigation Measures Due to their mounting location on a tall pole, the antennas are not accessible to the general public, and so no mitigation measures are necessary to comply with the FCC public exposure guidelines. HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.. 010705-0001 CONSULTING ENGINEERS HESAN FRANCISCO Page 2 of 3 s Alt Wireless Base Station Site NoQ001 13700 Old Skyway - Magalia, California It is presumed that AT&T will, as an FCC licensee, take adequate steps to ensure that its employees or contractors comply with FCC occupational exposure guidelines whenever work is required near the antennas themselves. Conclusion Based on the information and analysis above, it is the undersigned's professional opinion that the AT&T Wireless base station at 13700 Old Skyway in Magalia, California, will continue to comply with the prevailing standards for limiting public exposure to radio frequency energy and, therefore, does not for this reason cause a significant impact on the environment. The highest calculated level in publicly accessible areas is much less than the prevailing standards allow for exposures of unlimited duration. This finding is consistent with measurements of actual exposure conditions taken at other operating base stations. Authorship The undersigned author of this statement is a qualified Professional Engineer, holding California Registration Nos. E -13026 -and M-20676, expiring June 30, 2005. This work has been carried out by him or under his direction, and all statements are true and correct of his own knowledge except, where noted, when data has been supplied by others, which data he believes to be correct. �F 2 William F. �ett,.E. r jrl�:E_20Z6 -13`� ZJuly 12, 2001 5 � C EV.6-30-05 * A FCTR�GP�.�HAN%G�_��� HEHAMMETT & EDISON, INC. 010705-0001 CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO Page 3 of 3 J National funcil on Radiation Protection ankeasurements Report No. 86 (Published 1986) "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields" Radio Frequency Protection Guide Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Contact Currents Applicable Electric Magnetic Equivalent Far -Field (mA) Range Field Strength ' Field Strength Power Density (MHz) (V/m) (A/m) (mW/cm2) 0.3-1.34 614 614 1.63 1.63 100 100 200 1.34-3.0 614 823.8/f 1.63 2.19/f 100 1801P 200 3.0-30 1842/f 823.8/f 4.89/f 2.19/f 900/f2 1801P 200 30-300 61.4 27.5 0.163 0.0729 1.0 0.2 no limit 306– 1,500 3.54 1.59VT '0106 (7238 f/300 f/1500 no limit 1,500 – 100,000 137 61.4 0.364 0.163 5.0 1.0 no limit Note: f is frequency of emission, in MHz 1000 Power 100 Density 10 (mW/Cm2) 1 0.1 Contact 1000 Current (mA) 100 Occupational Exposure Public Exposure — — — 0.1 1 10 100 103 Frequency (MHz) 104 105 H HAMMETT & EDISON,.INC. NCRP-86 Standard CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO _ Figure 1 a RPOGROUND'm Calculation Metho oology Determination by Computer of Compliance with Human Exposure Limitations The U.S. Congress requires that the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") evaluate its actions for possible significant impact on the environment. In Docket 93-62, effective October 15, 1997, the FCC adopted the human exposure limits for field strength and power density recommended in Report No. 86, "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields," published in 1986 by the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements ("NCRP"). Separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter limits generally five times more restrictive. The more recent Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ("IEEE") Standard C95.1-1999, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz," includes nearly identical exposure limits. These limits apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such, that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits. The FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) gives the formula for calculating power density from an individual radiation source: 2.56 x 1.64 x 100 x RFF2 x [VERP + AERP] power density S = I 47cD2 , in mW/cm2, where VERP = 0.4 x total peak visual ERP (all polarizations), in kilowatts for NTSC, = average power (all polarizations), in kilowatts for DTV, AERP = total aural ERP (all polarizations), in kilowatts, RFF = relative field factor at the direction to the actual point of calculation, and D = distance from the center of radiation to the point of calculation, in meters. The factor of 2.56 accounts for the increase in power density due to ground reflection, assuming a reflection coefficient of 1.6 (1.6 x 1.6 = 2.56). The factor of 1.64 is the gain of a half -wave dipole relative to an isotropic radiator. The factor of 0.4 converts NTSC peak visual ERP to an average RMS value; for FM, cellular, and PCS stations, of course, the value of VERP is zero. The factor of 100 in the numerator converts to the desired units of power density. This formula has been built into a computer program by Hammett & Edison that calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any number of individual radiation sources. The program also allows for -the description of the actual terrain at the site to obtain more accurate projections. HEHAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO E C E 0 V E BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION Methodology Figure 2 AP 066-470-033 AT&T Wireless UP 01-25 IVIC31111 Distribution L- RZI L R"A !UULIUH LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: 1' 1 066-470-033 REPRESENTA height,REQUEST: Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mounted at the top of an existing 187 foot tall monopole,�ith twelve 4 sq.ft. l2anel antennas mounted at the 125 foot SIZE: 1,600 square feet • • On the east side of • • Sky3may,111 Old Sk_�nyay (Magalia Community Church), Ma lia SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT #5 EXISTING ZONING: C-2 ZONING HISTORY: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: 0 • BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, UP 01-25 DATE: July 5, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit to replace two omni -directional antennas mojnted at the top of an existing 187 foot tall monopole with twelve 4 sq,ft. panel antennas mounted at the 125 foot height, on property zoned C-2/AR-1(General Commercial) (Agricultural -Residential, 1-acrean reels) located on the east side of Old Skyway, at 137000 Old Skyway (Magalia Community Church), Magalia, identified as APN 066-470-033. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON August 23, 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN July 19, 2001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date:_ 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 Technical Services June 22, 2001 Steve Betts, Senior°Planner County of Butte Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 D ECEO E JUN 2 8 2001 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION Re: Use Permit Application — Existing Tower Antenna Modification Magalia Site — COO 13700 Old Skyway, Magalia, CA 95954 APN: 066-470-033 Dear Mr. Betts: -ATT AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. Suite 460 7112 N. Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93720 559 438-8888 FAX 559 438-6000 Please find attached to this letter the application materials as required by the County of Butte for consideration of approval to allow antenna modifications at our existing telecommunications facility located at the above referenced assessor's parcel. Project Justification AT&T Wireless Services is proposing to modify its current antenna array. The existing tower is currently utilizing omni -directional antennas. The AT&T engineers have determined that these antennas need to be replaced with new panel antennas at a lower height on the tower. Changing to directional antennas and implementing newer technology allows AT&T to better serve the area with quality service. This project is in conjunction with three other existing sites in Butte County for which applications are also being made to modify their antenna array. This site was originally constructed under Use Permit # 92-94 with corresponding Building Permits # 92-1261 & 92-1262. The Use Permit did not specify the number or type of antennas allowable at this facility. As a result, this application is beingmade to allow up to twelve panel antennas for use by AT&T. Project Description The proposed project consists of mounting up to twelve panel antennas on'an•-existing 180' monopole. A full independent Rigorous Structural Analysis on the project has been done and is included in this application. USA PROUD PARTNER OD IM QO9 Recycled Paper F Support Equipment This antenna array modification project does not impact the existing site. RFR/EMF and Wattage Output Data The Magalia site will produce Maximum Power/Channel into Antennas of 2.524 watts. There will be twenty-two (22) channels/sector with 3 sectors maximum. Horizontal and Vertical Location Coordinates The existing site is located at 39° 48' 32.6" North Latitude by 121° 34' 43.9" West Longitude. Elevations, dimensions, Etc. This modification project does not increase any heights of existing structures. The new modified sector array will be at approximately 125' AGL on the existing tower. Visual impact assessment, photo simulation Current site photos and photo simulation of proposed changes were previously submitted. Complete Service Area Map Attached is AT&T Wireless Confidential Butte County and Surrounding Area 3 Year Design Plan. Documentation which identifies failure characteristics Attached current tower analysis by Davidson Engineering incorporating proposed changes. Written Evidence Demonstrating Visual Unobtrusiveness of the Facility The new panel antennas are enclosed in a Grey PVC Radome. This Radome is non -reflective and the Grey color is non conspicuous. Evidence of a valid, current operating license Attached copy of license. A report, signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer licensed by the FCC Attached report from Hammett & Edison, Inc., Professional Engineers. Please call me at (559) 269-0709 for any questions regarding this application. Sincerely, David Miller, Construction Manager r Tel: (541) 582-8074 March 13, 2001 *AVIDSON ENGINEER*G CIVIL /'STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Rogue River, Oregon 97537 Fax: (541) 582-0072 E-mail: wdavidson@tower-structures.com DECEOVE Mr. Jim Daniels 4 U, ULJLUN 2 8 2001 UUUU AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 2729 Prospect Park, 1st Floor Rancho Cordova, California 95670 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION Re: Rigorous Structural Analysis of (Existing) 180 Foot Tall Self -Supporting Segmented Tapered 12 -sided Polygonal Pole for added support of 12 each Swedcom SC100-13Din CDMA/GSM panel antennas and 12 each runs of 1-5/8"� feed lines including new full sector antenna mount Project Location: Magalia Site - FCC Call Sign KNKA692 - FCC RegNo unknown 1-1/2 mi. N of Magalia Church, 13700 Old Skyway Magalia City, Butte County, California Lat: 390 48' 32.6" Long: 1210 34' 43.9" Pole Manufacturer: POWER STRUCTURES, INC. AT&T Wireless Site: Magalia Site, City of Magalia, CA (AT&T Site Number C001) DE Project No. 393-01 Dear Mr. Daniels: At your request, DAVIDSON ENGINEERING (DE) has completed a rigorous structural analysis of the subject pole for the addition of 12 each Swedcom SC100-13Din CDMA/GSM antennas with 12 each 1-5/8"� feed lines at +125 feet AGL. The antennas will be mounted on a new full sector 360 degree antenna mount. These new antennas and feed lines will be owned and operated by AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES. Also presented in the associated calculations is a description of the as -built pole construction, applicable design criteria, and the results of the self-supporting pole and foundation analysis. EXISTING POLE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION DE is in receipt of the original pole design documentation prepared by ENGINEERING ENDEAVORS, INCORPORATED. The documentation is dated 08 May 1995 and is stamped and signed by Mr. Thomas W. Shepke, a California licensed civil engineer. The design documentation describes the pole member sizes, material types, and material grades. It also describes the original foundation pier construction used for support of the pole, including concrete strength and reinforcing steel. The undersigned accompanied you on a site visit on March 1, 2000 in which certain digital images (photographs) of the existing pole construction and currently supported antenna and ancillary equipment were obtained. These digital images clarified the existing antennas currently supported by the pole. DESIGN CRITERIA Mr. Jim Daniel - AT&T WIRELESORVICES • page 2 - 03/13/01 Please refer to Section 1604 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code. The 1997 UBC defines EIA 222- F as a `recognized' design standard. Therefore, for the puposes of this structural analysis and review, the applicable wind load design standard is EIA 222-F, dated June 1996. The pole strength design was founded on a 75 MPH basic wind speed without radial icing. Exposure category `C' (open, flat terrain and grasslands) is conservatively assumed and implicit within EIA 222-F. Also implicit within EIA 222-F is a structural importance factor, I, of 1.00. Pole displacements (twist and sway) are only critical with respect to the currently existing 4 foot diameter microwave antenna mounted on the pole. The addition of the newly proposed cellular antennas may potentially impact the performance of the microwave antenna. This potential impact is discussed below within the body of this letter. The AISC `Specification for Structural Steel Buildings - Allowable Stress Design and Plastic Design, Ninth Edition 1989' served as the structural steel design criteria. PURPOSE OF ANALYSIS This report and the associated structural analysis were prepared for the purpose of adding a total of 12 each Swedcom SC100-13Din CDMA/GSM antennas and their feed lines to the pole. This equipment is in addition to certain other existing communications equipment and their feed lines. The total supported equipment configuration included in the self-supporting pole structural analysis is described as follows: Elevation Description Feed Line Notes 178.5' 3 ea DB809T3 3 ea 1-5/8"� AT&T Wireless 160' 1 ea 4 foot Std MW dish 1 ea EW63 w/ molded radome 125' 12 ea SC100-13Din CDMA/GSM 12 ea 1-5/8"� AT&T Wireless 0' - 180' removable climbing step bolts 0' - 148' 1 ea safety climb Antenna mount wind and dead loads were also included for each of the listed antennas. RESULTS OF ANALYSES Calculations indicate that the existing vertical and lateral force -resisting structural members, connections, and the pole's supporting foundation each have sufficient calculated strength capacity to accommodate the proposed antenna additions based on the stated design criteria (EIA 222-F; 75 MPH basic wind speed). Calculations further indicate that most of the structural members will have strength residual values between 100% and 200% after the Swedcom antennas are added to the structure. The foundation will possess a minimum residual capacity of approximately 11 %. Calculations also indicate that the structure possesses adequate structural stiffness for the support of the existing microwave antenna. The maximum calculated rotation at the location of the 4 foot Std MW dish (about either the vertical or two horizontal axes) is about 1.07 degrees at an EIA 222-F specified operational displacement wind load of 50 MPH basic wind speed. Additionally, displacements are limited to a maximum of about 2.41 degrees about any axis even at the EIA strength design wind load of 75 MPH basic wind speed. AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES should independently verify with the antenna manufacturer that the foregoing maximum axial rotations are acceptable for maintaining the communications path of the microwave antennas. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS Mr. Jim Daniel - AT&T WIRELES0RVICES • page 3 - 03/13/01 Calculations indicate that after the newly proposed full sector antenna mount and 12 each Swedcom SC100-13Din antennas are mounted at the 125 foot elevation AGL, the pole will continue to possess significant strength residuals for potential future antenna and feed line additions. The limiting factor appears to be the flexibility of the structure. Under the design wind load of 75 MPH basic wind speed, the pole has an average drift of about 1.39 degrees. The poles lowest frequency of vibration is about 1.583 seconds. This means that the pole is potentially susceptible to oscillations induced by vertex shedding. The pole manufacturer has provided wind vortex disrupters over the full height of the mid-upper and upper pole segments. These vortex disrupters should be left in place in order to provide protection against wind induced oscillatory pole vibrations. It is recommended that AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES proceed with the proposed 12 each Swedcom antenna, full sector antenna mount, and feed line installations at the + 125 level at their earliest convenience. AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES should independently verify with the microwave antenna manufacturer that a maximum 1.07 degree rotation about any axis under the influence of an EIA 222- F specified operational wind load of 50 MPH basic wind speed is acceptable for maintaining communication path of the standard microwave antenna mounted at the approximate 160 foot elevation AGL. All feed lines shall be installed on the interior of the pole and therefore do not add to the lateral wind load on the structure. A new portal (hand -hole) detail is attached to and accompanies this letter which describes the required material and access portal construction. The shape of the portal is rounded in order to eliminate stress concentrations typical at sharp corners. The elimination of these stress concentrations is important for the long-term viability of the structure. It is understood that the new hole cutting will be performed without acetylene torch equipment. The new holes will be cut be means of an abrasive cutting tool to prevent potential fire within the pole due to the possible presence of flammable bird nests. DOCUMENTATION AND P.E. STAMP Five copies of abridged engineering calculations are supplied herewith. A full engineering package including a digital computer model will be permanently maintained by DE. The calculations provided herewith bear the stamp and 'wet signature' of D. Wayne Davidson, a Registered Civil Engineer in the state of California. Mr. Davidson is a registered Structural Engineer in the state of Oregon and also possesses civil engineering registration in the states of Idaho, Wyoming and Wisconsin, and has a NCEES Council Record established and maintained with the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Mr. Davidson has specialized in the structural engineering and design/review of guyed and self-supporting communication poles for approximately 20 years. DE maintains full and complete records of each analysis in permanent archive. In the event that re -analysis of the structure is required at some future date, a reasonably fast and economical review of the structure can be provided. A complete set of `hard -copy' type -written engineering documents are maintained in DE's engineering archive as well as digital engineering files that may be quickly accessed. CSC TEDDs V4.0 and Multiframe4D® V7.5 were utilized for this project. Mr. Jim Daniel - AT&T W►RELES0RVICES page 4 - 03/13/01 DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY • This report and the associated structural analysis have been prepared with that degree of care and expertise normally consistent with generally accepted principles of engineering as exercised in the state of California by a professional engineering practice that possesses significant experience in the design and specification of guyed and self-supporting communication tower and pole structures. No other warranty is expressed or implied D. WAYNE DAVIDSON, doing business as DAVIDSON ENGINEERING (a sole proprietorship), shall not be held liable for consequential or incidental damages arising from defects in the pole's original design, subsequent design modifications, nor defects in material, workmanship, fabrication, or erection. DAVIDSON ENGINEERING's total liability, if any, shall be limited to the actual fees paid by AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES (or its affiliates) in consideration of the engineering services performed herein. It is understood that no field inspections were offered or performed within the scope of this project and that no warranty is made with regard to material suitability or fitness of purpose of the pole structure. It has been a great pleasure to be of service in this regard. I may be reached directly by phone at (541) 582-8074 for any questions or comments about this report, or I may alternatively be reached by e-mail at: `wdavidson@tower-structures.com'. Sincerely, 01;�� � %.- D. Wayne Davidson, P.E. No. C S1 33/i DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RI CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole —1 Old Skyway Magalia, CA Project Number 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services — Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. Rogue River, OR 97537 X1/1 Calc. by Date Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Internet: www.tower-structures.com Site No C001 FF Plate 3-1/2" x 3/8" ASTM A36 Mod 50 or ASTM A572 Gr 50 -- 1/2" plate A36 F = 36 k s i may be substituted for 50 k s i steel 2-1/2" A maximum of one portal shall occur at any given elevation. Separ a,t a portals by 120 degree r adi al s. New portals shall be separated by 18 inches in vertical el evati on. New portal s shat t be pt aced between el evati on 120 and 125 feet AGL. G r i n p a i n and z n coati ng 1/2" c ear of wet d i nterface. Wel di ng shal l conform to AWS D1. 1. Use E 7 0 1 8 wet di ng et ectrodes. Remove all stag after wel di ng and apply two coats ZRC 'paint - a p p I y 2 top - coats of z nc -ri ch p a i n to match e x i s t i ng col or. Vicinity Map - Magalia Pole Site - AT&T Wireless Services Maaa i'"" 20-6 a Site 13750 Old Skyway Magalia, CA 95954 39 8091-121 p N 39.8091 W 121.5789 N 39,48 32.6 W 12134 43.9 12 D , Paradi 'o Mi 0.2 0.4 06 Copyright 0 1988-2000 Microsoft Corp. and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved. http:/Avww.microsoft.com/Streets O Copyright 1999 by Geographic Data Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 0 1999 Navigation Technologies. All rights reserved. This data includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities 0 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Page 0 Copyright 1999 by Compusearch Micromarketing Data and Systems Ltd. 110 s Vicinity Map - Magalia Pole Site - AT&T Wireless Services 13750 Old Skyway Magalia, CA 95954 39.8091-121.5789 N 39.8091 W 121.5789 011 INC Old Magalia 0 YdS 50 100 150 200% 250 Copyright O 1988-2000 Microsoft Corp. and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved. http:ttwww.microsoft.com/Streets O Copyright 1999 by Geographic Data Technology. Inc. All rights reserved. m 1999 Navigation Technologies. All rights reserved This data includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities O Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Page © Copyright 1999 by Compusearch Micromarketing Data and Systems Ltd. ENGINEE CIVIL /STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road $Old Skyway Project Review (Fistng)80 Foot Steel Pole —DAVIDSON Magalfa ,CAr Project Number 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services —Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. Rogue River, OR 97537. CODE: EIA 222-F 1 / 1 Calc. by Date I I up 8 2 down) WIND: 75 MPH BASIC WIND SPEED Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site ORDINARY STRUCTURE ( 1'= 1.00 IMPLICIT ) Internet: www.tower-structures.com ICING: NONE 4 foot diameter Site No C001 ' CALCULATIONS FOR SUPPORT OF 4 11 + Be( CALCULATIONS 3 each D8809T3 CODE: EIA 222-F I I up 8 2 down) WIND: 75 MPH BASIC WIND SPEED EXPOSURE: TYPE 'C' ( OPEN TERRAIN IMPLICIT ) ORDINARY STRUCTURE ( 1'= 1.00 IMPLICIT ) ICING: NONE 4 foot diameter Std dl sn to molded ed radoma ' CALCULATIONS FOR SUPPORT OF THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT • 3 EA D13809T3 AT +180 +142 FEET AGL ON 4 FOOT STAND—OFF ARMS 0 UP & 2 DOWN) • 12 ea NEW 13D1 nLN on NEW fulll sector • 1 EA 4 FOOT SOLID MW DISH antenna mount 14 per face) AT'+160 FEET AGL • 12 EA SC100-13DIN PANELS AT +125 FEET AGL • FULL SECTOR MOUNT AT +lo�� +125 FEET AGL 4 11 + Be( DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RI CIVIL I STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole - Old Skyway Magalia, CA ., Project Number 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services -Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. Rogue River, OR 97537 F3 = (30.00 - 20.00) x W3 = 647.25 Ibf 2/1 Calc. by Date Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Internet: www.tower-structures.com Site No C001 CALCULATIONS CODE: EIA 222-F WIND: 75 MPH BASIC WIND SPEED EXPOSURE: TYPE 'C' ( OPEN TERRAIN IMPLICIT ) ORDINARY STRUCTURE (I = 1.00 IMPLICIT ) ICING: NONE Total Structure Height; h = 180 ft Wind Velocity; V = 75; (MPH) Stagnation Pressure; q = .002561bf/ft' x = 14.4000 Ibf/ft' ; Radial Icing; R = 0.0 in ; ; Gust Response Factor, G„ = 0.65 + 0.60 / ( h / 33 ft) "7 = 1.1209 ; POLE WIND LOADS; POLE WIND LOADS (CD +0.0' TO +38' AG L: ; Outside Pole Diameter (across flats); ODtop = 43.37 in ; ODbott = 52.00 in ; Wall Thickness; THr = 0.375 in; Lr = 40.856771 ft ;Diameter reduction per foot of height; DRED1 = (ODbott- ODrop) / L1 = 0.211225699 in / ft ; At +5.000'; ODS = ODbott - (DRED1 x 5.000) = 50.9439 in; At +15.00'; OD2 = ODbott - (DREDt x 15.00) = 48.8316 in; ;At +25.00'; OD3 = ODbott - (DREDi x 25.00) = 46.7194 in; ? At +35.00'; OD4 = ODbott- (DREDr x35.00) = 44.6071 in; Distributed_ Pole Wind Loads (a) +0.00' to +38.00' ;min; C = (1.0)°'S x V x OD4112 = 278.7944; > 64 Use Pole Force Coefficient; CFP = 1.03 ; per Table 1, page 7, EIA 222-F ;At+5.00'; Wr = gx(33/33ft)2flxGHxCFaxOD1/12=70.581bf/ft; ; At +15.0' ; W2 = q x (33 / 33 ft )w x GH x CFP x OD2 / 12 = 67.65 Ibf / ft ; ; At +25.0' ; W3 = q x (33 / 33 ft)w x GH x CFP x OD3 / 12 = 64.72 Ibf / ft ; ; A t +35.0' ; W4 = q x ( 35.0 / 33 ft)W x GH x CFP x OD4 / 12 = ,62.85 Ibf / ft ; Concentrated Pole Wind Loads Q +0.00' to +38.00' At +5.00'; Fr = (10.00 - 0.00) x W, = 705.77 Ibf At +15.0' ; F2 = (20.00 - 10.00) x W2 = 676.51 Ibf At +25.0' ; F3 = (30.00 - 20.00) x W3 = 647.25 Ibf At +35.0' ; F4 = (38.00 - 30.00) x W4 = 502.77 Ibf DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RI CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road r Project:' Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole - Old Skyway Magaua, CA Project Number 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services - Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. Rogue River, OR 97537 311 Calc. by Date -T Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia SiteSite Internet: www.tower-structures.com No C001 POLE WIND LOADS (CD +38.0' TO +72' AGL• ; Outside Pole Diameter (across flats); ODtop = 36.7666 in ; ODbott = 45.389 in ; Wall Thickness; TH2 = 0.34375 in ; L2 = 39.752583 ft ;Diameter reduction per foot of height; DRED2 = (ODbott- ODtop) / L2 = 0.216901629 in / it ; At +35.00' ; OD6 = ODbott - ( DRED2 x (420 - 416.219) / 12) = 45.3207 in ; ; At +45.00 ; OD7 = ODbott - ( DRED2 x (540-416-219)112) = 43.1516 in; ; At +55.00' ; 008 = ODbott - ( DRED2 x (660-416.219)112). = 40.9826 in; ; At +65.00' ; OD9 = ODbott - ( DRED2 x (780-416.219)112) = 38.8136 in ; At +70.00': OD10 = ODbott - ( DRED2 x (840 - 416.219)'l 12) = 37.7291 in ; Distributed Pole Wind Loads na +38 00' to +72.00' Pole force coefficient; CFP = 1.03; GH = 1.1209 ; At +35.00' ; W6 = q x (35.0 / 33 ft)W x GH x CFP x ODs / 12 = 63.851bf / ft ; ; At +45.00' ; W7 = q x ( 45.0 / 33 ft )y' x GH x CFP x OD7 / 12 = 65.32 Ibf/ ft ; At +55.00': W6 = q x (55.0 / 33 ft)w x GH x CFP x ODe / 12 = 65.701bf / ft ; At +65.00'; W9 = q x ( 65.0 / 33 ft )L' x GH x CFP x OD9 / 12 = 65.26 Ib(/ ft ; At +70.00'; W10 = q x ( 70.0 / 33 ft)27 x GH x CFP x 0D10 / 12 = 64.80 lbf / ft; Concentrated Pole Wind Loads Cod +38.00' to +72.00' ; At +40.00' ; F6 = (45.00 - 38.00) x (W6 + W7) / 2 = 452.11 Ibf ; At +50.00' ; F7 =(55.00-45.00)x (W7 + W6) / 2 = 655.10 Ibf At +60.00'; Fs = (65.00 - 55.00) x (W6 + Wq) / 2 = 654.81 Ibf At +70.00' ; F9 = (70.00 - 65.00) x (Ws + W1o) / 2 = .325.15 Ibf DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RI i CIVIL /STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole - Old Skyway Magalia, CA Project Number 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services -Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. Rogue River, OR 97537 4/1 Calc. by Date Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Internet: www.tower-structures.com Site No C001 POLE WIND LOADS (CD +72,0' TO +106' AGL• Outside Pole Diameter (across flats); ODtop = 30.2508 in ; ODbott = 38.6712 in ; Wall Thickness; TH3 = 0.28125 in; L3 = 38.9115 ft ;Diameter reduction per foot of height; DRED3 = (ODbott- ODtop) / L3 = 0.216398751 in / ft ; ; A t +70.00' ; OD 12 = ODbott - ( DRED3 x (840-829.25)112) = 38.4773 in; ; At +75.00 ; OD 13 = ODbott - ( DRED3 x (900-829.25)112) = 37.3953 in; At +85.00'; OD14 = ODbott - ( DRED3 x (1020 - 829.25) / 12) = 35.2314 in; At +95.00'; OD15 = ODbott - (DRED3 x (1140- 829.25)112) = 33.0674 in; ; At +105.00' ; OD16 = ODbott - ( DRED3 x (1260-829.25)112) = 30.9034 in ; Distributed Pole Wind Loads (a) +72.00' to +106.00' Pole force coefficient; CFP = 1.03; GH = 1.1209 ; At +70.00' ; W12 = g x ( 70.0 / 33 ft )W x GH x CFP x OD12 / 12 = 66.081bf/ ft ; ; At +75.00' ; W13 = q x ( 75.0 / 33 ft )27 x GH x CFP x OD13 / 12 = 65.50 /bf / ft ; At +85.00' ; W14 = q x ( 85.0 / 33 ft )27 x GH x CFP x OD14 / 12 = 63.96 /bf / ft ; ;At+95.00'; W15 = gx(95.0/33ft)WxGHxCFPxOD15/12=61.971bf/R; ;At+105.00'; W16 = qx(105.0/33ft)2flxGHx•CFPxOD1e/12=59.591bf/ft; Concentrated Pole Wind Loads (a) +72.00' to +106.00' At +70.00' ; F12 =(75.00-70.00)x (W12 + W13) / 2 = 328.96 Ibf At +80.00'; F13 = (85.00- 75.00) x (W14 + W13) / 2 = 647.31 - Ibf At +90.00' ; F14 = (95.00 - 85.00) x (W15 + W14 ) / 2 = 629.64 Ibf At +100.00'; F15 = (105.00 - 95.00) x (W16 + W15) 12 = 607.81 Ibf M DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RI CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole - Old Skyway Magalla, CA Project Number 93- 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services -Jim Daniel Sheet no Rogue River, OR 97537 5/1 Calc. by Date Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Internet: www.tower-structures.com Site No C001 POLE WIND LOADS (U7 +106.0' TO +142' AGL• Outside Pole Diameter (across flats); ODtbp = 23.2470 in ; ODbott = 31.9097 in ; Wall Thickness; TH4 = 0.2500 in: L4 40.03125 ft ;Diameter reduction per foot of height; DRED4 = (ODbott- ODtop) / L4 = 0.216398439 in / ft ; At +105.00' ; OD18 = ODbott - ( DRED4 x (1260 - 1242.313) / 12 ) = 31.5907 in ; At +110.00 ; ODig = ODbott - (DRED4 x (1320 - 1242.313) / 12) 30.5088 in; At +120.00' ; OD20 = ODbott - ( DRED4 x (1440 -1242.313) / 12) = 28.3448 in; At +130.00' ; OD21 = ODbott - ( DRED4 x (1560 - 1242.313) / 12) = 26.1808 in; At +140.00'; OD22 = ODbort - ( DRED4 x (1680 - 1242.313) / 12) = 24.0168 in; Distributed Pole Wind Loads R +106.00' to +142.00' Pole force coefficient; CFP = 1.03; GH =1.1209 ;At+105.00'; Wi8 = gx(105.0/33ft)wxGHxCFP xOD18/12 =60.92 IV/ft; ;At+110.00'; Wig = gx(110.0/33ft)wxGHxCFPxODig/12=59.62/bf/ft; At +120.00'; W2o = q x ( 120.0 / 33 ft )yr x GH x CFP x OD2o / 12 = 56.79 /bf / ft ; ;At+130.00'; W21 = qx(130.0/33ft)wxGHxCFPxOD21/12=53.661bf1ft; At +140.00'; W22 = q x ( 140.0 / 33 ft )w x GH x CFP x OD22 / 12 = 50.28 /bf / ft ; Concentrated Pole Wind Loads Al +106.00' to +142.00' At +107.50' ; F18 =(110.00-105.00)x (Wi8 + W1g) / 2 = 301.35 lbf At +.115.00'; Fig = (120.00- 110.00) x (Wig + W2o) / 2 = 582.03 ibf At +125.00' ; F20 = (130.00 - 120.00) x (W2o + W2i) / 2 = 552.24 lbf At +135.00' ; F21 = (140.00 - 130.00) x (W21 + W22) / 2 = 519.72 lbf I DAVIDSON ENGINEERIN I CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road I Rogue River, OR 97537 Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 Internet: www.tower-structures.com Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole Magalia, CA Client: AT&T Wireless Services - Jim Daniel Calc. by Date DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Site No C001 Old Skyway Project Number I 393-01 y Sheet no./rev. 6/1 POLE WIND LOADS tW +142.0' TO +180' AGL• Outside Pole Diameter (across flats); ODtop = 16.000 in ; ODbott = 24.5827 in ; Wall Thickness; TH5 = 0.1875 in ; L5 = 40.0000 ft :Diameter reduction per foot of height; DRED5 = (ODbott- ODtop) / L5 = 0.214567500 in / ft ; At +140.00' ; OD24 = ODbott - ( DRED5 x (1680 - 1680) / 12 ) = 24.5827 in; At +145.00; OD25 = ODbott - (DRED5 x (1740 - 1680) / 12) = 23.5099 in; At +155.00'; OD26 = ODbott - (DRED5 x (1860 - 1680) / 12) = 21.3642 in; At +165.00'; OD27 = ODboe - ( DRED5 x (1980 -1680) / 12) = 19.2185 in; At +175.00'; OD28 = ODbott - (DRED5 x (2100 - 1680) / 12) = 17.0728 in; At + 186.00' ; OD29 = ODbott - ( DRED5 x (2160 - 1680) / 12) = 16.0000 in; Distributed Pole Wind Loads (d +142 00' to +180.00' Pole force coefficient; CFp = 1.03: GH = 1.1209 At +140.00'; W24 = q x ( 140.0 / 33 ft )yr x GH x CFP x OD24 / 12 = 51.47 /bf / ft ; At + 145.00' ; W25 = q x ( 145.0 / 33 ft )w x GH x CFP x OD25 / 12 = 49.72 /bf / ft ; At + 155.00' ; W26 = q x ( 155.0 / 33 ft )2 7 x GH x CFP x OD26 / 12 = 46.05 lbf / ft; At +165.00',- W27 = gx(165.0/33ft)v7xGHxCFP xOD27/12=42.17lbf /ft; At +175.00'; W26 = q x ( 175.0 / 33 ft )w x GH x CFP x OD28 / 12 = 38.10 lbf / ft; At +180.00'; W29 = q x ( 180.0 / 33 ft )v7 x GH x CFP x OD29 / 12 = 35.991&/ ft; Concentrated Pole Wind Loads na +142 00' to +180.00, At +142.50' ; F18 = (145.00 - 140.00) x (W24 + W25) / 2 = 252.96 lbf At + 150.00' ; F19 = (155.00 - 145.00) x (W25 + W26) / 2 = 478.82 lbf At +160.00'; Flo = (165.00- 155.00) x (W26+ W27)/2 = 441.09 lbf At +170.00'; F21 = (175.00 - 165.00) x (W27 + W26) 12 = 401.33 lbf At +177.50' ; F21 = (180.00 - 175.00) x (W28 + W29 ) / 2 = 185.22 ibf DAVIDSON ENGINEERI CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Rogue River, OR 97537 Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 Internet: www.tower-structures.com Discrete Equipment Wind and Dead Loads Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole — Magalia, CA Client: AT&T Wireless Services — Jim Daniel Calc. by Date DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Site No C001 Top Antenna Mount Side -Arm Assemblies A +178.5 ft C L Wind and Dead Load Mount Area ; AR = 2 x 4.0 ft x 3.5 in / 12 = 2.33 ft ; CF = 1.2; (round member shape factor) Mount Wind Load; FMNT = q x (178.5 / 33 )z7 x GH x CF x AR = 73 lbf,- Mount DL ; DLMNT = 2 x 4.0 ft x 7.6 + 15 76 Ibf Old Skyway 3 each DB809T3 Whip Antennas Ca +176.83 ft avq C L Wind and Dead Load (1 up & 2 down) :Antenna Area on one face; A809 = 3 x 10.7 ft x 2.50 in / 12 = 6.69 ft' ; CF800 = 1.2 ;(round member shape factor); Antenna Wind Load; Fso9 = q x (176.83 / 33 )y' x GH x CF809 x Aso9 = 209 Ibf,• Antenna DL ; DL809 = 3 x 30.5 Ibf = 92 Ibf 4 Foot Diameter Solid MW Dish (a- +160' with molded radome Wind and Dead Load ;From published data on page 137 of Andrew Catalog 35; wind approach angle for max FA; Project Number 393-01 Sheet no./rev. 7/1 maximum Dish Force @ 125 MPH; F125 = 450 Ibf. Force at 75 MPH; F75 = F125 x (752 / 1252) = 162 Ibf,• modified by height coefficient and gust response factors; Kz = (160 ft / 33 ft)2/7 = 1.5700; GH Wind Force on Dish; Fdish = Kz x GH x F75 = 285 Ibf ; @ +160' Wind Force on Mounts and azimuth adjust struts; Fmnt = q x Kz x GH x 1.8 x (4 ft x 3 in + 0.2 x 0.67 x 3 ft x 2.375 in) / 12 = 49 lbf ; @ +160' Total wind force applied at +160' AGL ; FTot = Fdish + Fmnt = 334 Ibf,• @ +160' AGL Mount and MW Dish DL; DLMw = 119 Ibf + 51 Ibf = 170 lbf,• (4 ft Std MW dish plus mount) i DAVIDSON ENGINEERIM I CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Rogue River, OR 97537 Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 Internet: www.tower-structures.com Discrete Equipment Wind and Dead Loads Project: Review (Existing) •180 Foot Steel Pole — Magalia, CA Client: AT&T Wireless Services — Jim Daniel Calc. by Date DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Site No C001 12 each SC100-13Din panel antennas (a) +125' Wind and Dead Load (AT&T Wireless) Panel Diamensions; H = 86.0 in; W = 6.5 in; D = 8.0 in Panel Area on One Face; AFP = 4 x H x D / 144 = 19.11 ft' Antenna Top Elevation; tp = 128.5833 ft ; Antenna Bottom Elevation; by = 121.4167 ft Average Antenna Height; zp = (tp + bp) 12 = 125.00 ft Antenna Height Coefficient; Kzp = (zp / 33 ft )w = 1.4630 Section Shape Factor Force Coefficient; CFP = 2.7; (for all three faces) Po = q x KZp x GH X CFP X AFP = 1218 /bf ; (for all three faces) Antenna Dead Load; DLP = 12 x 36 Of = 432 lbf ; Antenna mount (a) +125' Wind and Dead Load (AT&T Wireless) Mount Area; AMNT = 12 ft x 2.875 in X 2 / 12 + 2 x 7 ft x 2.875 in / 12 = 9.10 ft2 ; (on one face) Average Mount Elevationt; ZMNT = 125 ft = 125.00 ft Antenna Height Coefficient; KzMNT = (zMNT / 33 ft )w = 1.4630 Shape Factor Force Coefficient; CFMNT = p 1.81; (for all three faces) PMNT = q X KZMNT X GH X CFMNT x AMNT = 389 1& ; (for all three faces) Mount Dead Load; DLMNT = 3 x 14 x 5.79 lbf + 12 x 70 lbf = 1083 Ibf Old Skyway Project Number 1 393-01 S Sheet no./rev. 8/1 DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RI CIVIL I STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole - Old Skyway Magalia, CA Project Number 93- 393 01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services -Jim Daniel Sheet no Rogue River, OR 97537 9/1 Calc. by Date Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Dilagalia Site Internet: www.tower-structures.com Site No C001 Pole Properties CD +0.0' AGL Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ; wall thickness; THo = 0.375 in Pole OD (across flats); ODo = 52.00 in; ;Rio = ODo / 2 = 26.000000 in; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 26.917181 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rti = Rio - THo = 25.625000 in; Ri = Rti / cos (0) = 26.528952 in; Ao = n x (Rto)2 x tan (0) = 2173.60 int; ;Ai = n x (Rtd2 x tan (0) = 2111.36 int; net Area; Aonet = Ao - Ai = 62.25 int; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 13.933358 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 13.732396 in; net moment of Inertia; to = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (Ai x (6 x R,? - a,?) / 24) = 21234.86 in'; net section modulus; So = to / Ro = 788.90 in3; (a) +5.0' A GL Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ; wall thickness; TH5 = 0.375 in Pole OD (across flats); OD5 = 50.944 in; ; Rio = OD5 / 2 = 25.472000 in; ; Ro = Rio / cos 26.370555 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rti = Rio - TH5 = 25.097000 in; Ri = Rti /cos (o) = 25.982326 in; Ao = n x (Rio)2 x tan (0) = 2086.22 int; ; Ai = n x (Rid2 x tan (0) = 2025.24 int; net Area; A5net = Ao - Ai = 60.97 int; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 13.650404 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 13.449442 in; net moment of Inertia; 15 = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (Ai x (6 x R,2 - a,?) / 24) = 19958.28 in4; ;net section modulus; S5 = I5 / Ro = 756.84 in'; (aD +15.0' AGL Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 1801n = 15.00 deg, ;wall thickness; THr5 = 0.375 in Pole OD (across flats); OD15 = 48.832 in; ;Rio = ODr5/2 = 24.416000 in; Ro = Rio /cos (0) = 25.277303 in; ;Pole IR (across flats); Rti = Rro - TH15 = 24.041000 in; Ri = Rii / cos (o) = 24.889075 in; Ao = n x (Rto)2 x tan (o) = 1916.83 int; ;Ai = n x (Rid2 x tan (0) = 1858.40 int; ; net Area; A15net = Ao-Ai = 58.43 int; ; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 13.084495 in; ;ai = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 12.883533 in; ;net moment of Inertia; 115 = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R 2 - a,?) / 24) = 17560.70 in4; ;net section modulus; S15= 1151R, = 694.72 in 3; DAVIDSON ENGINEERIM CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Rogue River, OR 97537 Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 Internet: www.tower-structures.com Pole Properties (cont'd) CcD +25.0' AGL Project: Review (Existing) 18Q Foot Steel Pole Magalia, CA Client: AT&T Wireless Services - Jim Daniel Calc. by Date DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Site No C001 f Old Skyway Project Number 393-01 i Sheet no./rev. I 10/1 Number of sides; n = 12; = 180 / n = •15.00 deg; ;wall thickness; TH25 = 0.375 in Pole OD (across flats); OD25 = 46.719 in; ;Rio = OD25 / 2 = 23.359500 in; Ro = Rio / cos 24.183534 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rii = RIO - TH25 = 22.984500 in; Ri = Rti / cos (0) = 23.795305 in; Ao = n x (R,o)2 x tan (0) = 1754.53 in 2; ; Ai = n x (Rid2 x tan (0) = 1698.65 in2; net Area; A25net = Ao - Ai = 55.88 int; ; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 12.518318 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 12.317356 in; net moment of Inertia; 125 = (Ao x (6 x R 2_ a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R,2 - a,?) / 24) = 15362.26 in4; net section modulus; S25= 125 / Ro = 635.24 in3; (ci� +35.0' AGL (bottom of splice) Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ;wall thickness; TH35 = 0.375 in Pole OD (across flats); OD35 = 44.607 in; ; Rio = OD35 / 2 = 22.303500 in; ; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 23.090282 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rti = Rio - TH25 = 21.928500 in; Ri = Rii / cos (0) = 22.702054 in; Ao = n x (Rto)2 x tan (0) = 1599.48 int; ; Ai = n x (Rid2 x tan (0) = 1546.15 int; net Area; A35net = Ao - Ai = 53.33 int; I ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 11.952410 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 11.751448 in; net moment of Inertia; 135 = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R,? - a,?) / 24) = 13356.33 in4; :net section modulus; S35= 135 / Ro = 578.44 in3; (aD +40'10-9/32"A GL I Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ; wall thickness; TH5 = 0.375 in Pole OD (across flats); OD5 = 43.370 in; ;Rio = OD5 / 2 = 21.685000 in; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 22.449964 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rii = Rio - TH5 = 21.310000 in; Ri = Ru/cos(0) = 22.061735 in; Ao = n x (Rio)2 x tan (0) = 1512.00 int; ;Ai = n x (Rtd2 x tan (0) = 1460.16 int; net Area; A41net = Ao - Ai = 51.84 int; ; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 11.620956 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (o) = 11.419995 in; ;net moment of Inertia; 141 = (Ao x (6 x R 2_ a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R,2 - a,?) / 24) = 12266.85 in4; net section modulus; Sot = 141 / Rto = 565.68 in3; DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RI CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Project: Review (Existing).1 80 Foot Steel Pole - Old Skyway Magalia, CA Project Number 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services - Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. Rogue River, OR 9753711 1 Calc. by Date ---[ Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 � DWD 12-March-2001.Magalia Site Internet: www.tower-structures.comSite No C001 Pole Properties (cont'd) (@ +35.0' A GL (top of splice) Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ; wall thickness; TH35 = 0.34375 in Pole OD (across flats); OD35 = 45.321 in; ; Rio = OD35 / 2 = 22.660500 in; ; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 23.459876 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rii = Rio - TH35 = 22.316750 in; Ri = Rii / cos (0) = 23.104000 in; Ao = n x (Rio)2 x tan (0) = 1651.10 int; ; Ai = n x (Rid2 x tan (0) = 1601.38 %n2; net Area; A35net = Ao - Ai = 49.71 int; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 12.143725 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (o) = 11.959510 in; ;net moment of Inertia; 135 = (Ao x (6 x R 2_ a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R,? - a,?) / 24) = 12872.46 in4; :net section modulus; S35= 135 / Ro = 548.70 in3; ) +45.0' AGL Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ; wall thickness; TH45 = 0. 343 75 in Pole OD (across flats); OD45 = 43.152 in; ; Rio = OD45 / 2 = 21.576000 in; ; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 22.337119 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rii = Rio - TH45 = 21.232250 in; Ri = Rii / cos (0) = 21.981243 in; Ao = n x (Rio)2 x tan (0) = 1496.84 int; ; Ai = n x (Rid 2 x tan (0) = 1449.53 int; net Area; A45net = Ao - Ai = 47.32 int; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 11.562544 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 11.378328 in; net moment of Inertia; 145 = (Ao x (6 x R 2_ a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R,? - a,z) / 24) = 11098.60 in4; ;net section modulus; S45 = 145 / Ro = 496.87 in3; @+55.0' AGL Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ; wall thickness; TH55 = 0.34375 in Pole OD (across flats); OD55 = 40.983 in; ;Rio = OD55 / 2 = 20.491500 in; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 21.214362 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rii = Rio - TH55 = 20.147750 in; Ri = Rii /cos (0) = 20.858486 in; Ao = n x (Rio)2 x tan (0) = 1350.15 int; ; Ai = n x (Rid 2 x tan (0) = 1305.23 int; net Area; A55net = Ao-Ai = 44.92 in 2; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 10.981362 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (o) = 10.797147 in; net moment of Inertia; 155 = (Ao x (6 x R 2_ a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R 2 - a,?) / 24) = 9495.67 in 4; net section modulus; S55 = 155 / Ro = 447.61 in3; DAVIDSON ENGINEERIM CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Rogue River, OR 97537 Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 Internet: www.tower-structures.com Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole Magalia, CA Client: AT&T Wireless Services - Jim Daniel Calc. by Date DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Site No C001 Old Skyway Project Number 393-01 Sheet no./rev. i 12/1 I Pole Properties (cont'd) Cad +65.0' A GL Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ;wall thickness; TH65 = 0.34375 in Pole OD (across flats); OD65 = 38.814 in; ; Rio = OD65 / 2 = 19.407000 in; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 20.091605 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rt; = Rio - TH65 = 19.063250 in; Ri = Rti / cos (0) = 19.735729 in,- Ao n;Ao = n x (Rto)2 x tan (0) = 1211.02 int; ;Ai = n x (Rid 2 x tan (0) = 1168.50 int; I net Area: A65net = Ao - A; = 42.52 int; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 10.400180 in; ; a; = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 10.215965 in; net moment of Inertia; 165 = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (A; x (6 x R,? - a,?) / 24) = 8055.03 in'; I :net section modulus; S65 = 165 / Ro = 400.92 in3; I (aD +70.0' AGL (bottom of splice) Number of sides; n = 12: ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; - ;wall thickness; TH70 = 0.34375 in Pole OD (across flats); OD70 = 37.729 in; ;RIO = OD70 / 2 = 18.864500 in; ; Ro = RIO / cos (0) = 19.529968 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rti = Rio - TH70 = 18.520750 in; Ri = Rti / cos (0) = 19.174091 in; I Ao = n x (Rio) x tan 2 2 2 ( (�) = 1144.26 in ; ; A; = n x (Rte x tan (0) = 1102.94 in ; net Area; A70net = Ao - Ai = 41.32 int; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 10.109455 in; ; a; = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 9.925240 in; net moment of Inertia; 170 = (Ao x(6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R,? - ai2) / 24) = 7392.57 in'; I :net section modulus; S70 = 170 / Ro = 378.52 in3; i (Z� +70.0' AGL (top of splice) Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ;wall thickness; TH70 = 0.28125 in :.Pole OD (across flats); OD70 = 38.477 in; ; Rio = OD7o / 2 = 19.238500 in; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 19.917161 in, j :Pole IR (across flats); Rii = RIO-TH70 = 18.957250 in; Ri = Rt; / cos (o) = 19.625989 in; j Ao = n x (Rto)2 x tan (0) = 1190.08 int; ;Ai = n x (Rid 2 x tan (0) = 1155.54 int; net Area; A70net = Ao - A; = 34.54 in 2; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 10.309881 in; ; a; = 2 x Ri x sin (o) = 10.159160 in; net moment of Inertia; /7o = (Ao x (6 x R 2_ a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R,? - a,?) / 24) = 6450.24 in °; 3 ;net section modulus; S7o = 17o / Ro = 323.85 in, DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RI CIVIL /STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole - 1 Old Skyway Magalia, CA Project Number 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services - Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. Rogue River, OR 97537 13/1 Calc. by Date Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 Internet: www.tower-structures.com DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Site No C001 Pole Properties (cont'd) +75.0' AGL i I ; Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ;wall thickness; TH75 = 0.28125 in Pole OD (across flats); OD75 = 37.395 in; ; Rio = OD75 / 2 = 18.697500 in; ; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 19.357076 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rti = RIO - TH75 = 18.416250 in; Ri = Rt; / cos (Q) = 19.065905 in; Ao = n x (RIO)2 x tan (0) = 1124.09 int; ;Ai = n x (Rt;)2 x tan (0) = 1090.53 inZ; : net Area; A75net = Ao - Ai = 33.56 in 2; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 10.019960 in; ;ai = 2 x R; x sin (o) = 9.869239 in; net moment of Inertia; 175 = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (A; x (6 x R,? - a,?) / 24) = 5917.48 in4; net section modulus; S75 = 175 / Ro = 305.70 in3; Cad +85.0' AGL Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ;wall thickness; TH85 = 0.28125 in Pole OD (across flats); OD85 = 35.231 in; ; Rio = OD85 / 2 = 17.615500 in; : Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 18.236908 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rti = Rio - TH85 = 17.334250 in; Ri = R,; /cos (0) = 17.945736 in; Ao = n x (Rto)2 x tan (0) = 997.75 int; ;Ai = n x (Rid 2 x tan (0) = 966.15 int; net Area; A85net = Ao - Ai = 31.61 int; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 9.440118 in; ai = 2 x R; x sin (0) = 9.289397 in; net moment of Inertia; 185 = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R;2 - a;2) / 24) = 4941.60 in4; net section modulus; S85 = 185 / Ro = 270.97 in3; W +95.0' AGL Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ;wall thickness; TH95 = 0.28125 in Pole OD (across flats); OD95 = 33.067 in; ; Rio = OD95 / 2 = 16.533500 in; Ro = Rio / cos (o) = 17.116739 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rt; = Rio - TH95 = 16.252250 in; R; = Rt; /cos (o) = 16.825567 in; Ao = n x (RIO)2 x tan (0) = 878.95 int; ; Ai = n x (Rtd2 x tan (0) = 849.30 int; i j :net Area; A95net = Ao - A; = 29.65 int; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 8.860276 in; ; ai = 2 x R; x sin (0) = 8.709555 in; I j ;net moment of Inertia; 195 = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (,Aix (6 x R,? - a;2) / 24) = 4079.39 in4; ;net section modulus; S95 = 1951R, = 238.33 in3; DAVIDSON ENGINEERI4M CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Rogue River, OR 97537 Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 Internet: www.tower-structures.com Project: Review (Existing).180 Foot Steel Pole Magalia, CA Client: AT&T Wireless Services - Jim Daniel Calc. by Date DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Site No 000.1 Old Skyway Project Number 'r 393-01 Sheet no./rev. 14/1 Pole Properties (cont'd) t (cD +105.0' AGL (bottom of splice) Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ;wall thickness; TH105 = 0.28125 in Pole OD (across flats); OD105 = 30.903 in; ; R10 = OD1o5 / 2 = 15.451500 in; ; Ro = R10 /cos (o) = 15.996570 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rt; = RIO-TH105 = 15.170250 in; Ri = R1i / cos (0) = 15.705398 in; i i Ao = n x (Rip)2 x tan (0) = 767.67 in 2; Ai = n x (Rid2 x tan (0) = 739.98 in 2; ;net Area; A 105net = Ao-Ai = 27.69 int; ; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (o) = 8.280434 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (o) = 8.129712 in; i ;net moment of Inertia; 1105 = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (A, x (6 x R,2 - a,?) / 24) = 3323.79 in'; net section modulus; 5105 = /105/Ro = 207.78 in3; I I ! cD +105.0' AGL (top of splice) Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ; wall thickness; TH105 = 0.250 in Pole OD (across flats); OD105 = 31.591 in; ;Rio = OD105 / 2 = 15.795500 in; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 16.352705 in; Pole IR (across flats); R1i = Rio - TH105 = 15.545500 in; Ri = R1i/cos (o) = 16.093886 in; Ao = n x (Rio)2 x tan (0) = 802.23 int; ; Ai = n x (R1d2 x tan (0) = 777.04 int; net Area; A105net = AO -Ai = 25.19 int; I ac = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 8.464783 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (o) = 8.330808 in; I net moment of Inertia; 1105 = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (Ai x (6 x R,? - ai2) / 24) = 3167.53 in'; :net section modulus; S105 = 1105 / Ro = 193.70 in3; i A +110.0' AGL I I Number of sides; n = 12; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; wall thickness; TH110 = 0.250 in ! Pole OD (across flats); OD1to = 30.509 in; ; Rio = OD11o/ 2 = 15.254500 in; Ro = Rio /cos (0) = 15.792620 in; Pole IR (across flats); R1i = RIO - THt10 = 15.004500 in; Ri = R1i/cos (0) = 15.533801 in; i Ao = n x (Rio) 2 x tan (0) = 748.22 int; ; Ai = n x (Rid2 x tan (0) = 723.90 int; I ;net Area; Allonet = AO -Ai = 24.32 int; ; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 8.174862 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 8.040887 in; net moment of Inertia; 1110 = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R,2 - ai2) / 24) = 2850.68 in°; i:net section modulus; Silo = 1110/Ro = 180.51 in3; DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RI CIVIL I STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole - 1 Id Skyway Magalia, CA Project Number 393 01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services - Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. j Rogue River, OR 97537 15 / 1 Calc. by Date � Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site 7 I Internet: www.tower-structures.com Site No C001 Pole Properties (cont'd) (a -D +120.0' AGL Number of sides; n = 12: = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ;wall thickness; TH120 = 0.250 in Pole OD (across flats); OD120 = 28.346 in; ;Rio = OD120 / 2 = 14.173000 in; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 14.672969 in; I Pole IR (across flats); Rii = Rio - TH120 = 13.923000 in; Ri = R1i /cos (o) = 14.414150 in; Ao = n x (RIO) 2 x tan (0) = 645.89 int; ; Ai = n x (Rid 2 x tan (0) = 623.30 in 2; ;net Area; A120net = Ao-Ai = 22.58 int; ; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 7.595288 in; :ai = 2 x Ri x sin (o) = 7.461313 in; ;net moment of Inertia; 1120 = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R,? - a,?) / 24) = 2282.04 in4; ; net section modulus; S120 = 1120 / Ro = 155.53 in3; (a) +125.0' AGL Number of sides; n = 12; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ; wall thickness; THi25 = 0.250 in Pole OD (across flats); OD125 = 27.265 in; ;Rio = OD125 / 2 = 13.632500 in; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 14.113403 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rii = Rio - TH125 = 13.382500 in; Ri = R1i / cos (0) = 13.854583 in; Ao = n x (RIO) 2 x tan (0) = 597.56 int; ; Ai = n x (Rid2 x tan (0) = 575.85 in 2; net Area; A125net = Ao - At = 21.72 in 2; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 7.305635 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 7.171660 in; net moment of Inertia; 1125 = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R,? - a?) / 24) = 2028.65 in4; :net section modulus; S125 = 1125 / Ro = 143.74 in3; @ +130.0' AGL Number of sides; n = 12; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ; wall thickness; TH130 = 0.250 in Pole OD (across flats); OD130 = 26.183 in; ; Rio = OD130 / 2 = 13.091500 in; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 13.553318 in; Pole IR (across flats); R1i = RIO - TH13o = 12.841500 in; R; = Rii/cos (0) = 13.294499 in; ;Ao = n x (Rio)2 x tan.(0) = 551.08 int; ;Ai = n x (R1d2 x tan (0) = 530.23 int; net Area; A13onet = Ao - Ai = 20.85 in 2; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 7.015714 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 6.881739 in; net moment of Inertia; 1130 = ( Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - ( Ai x (6 x R;2 - a,?) / 24) = 1794.54 in4; net section modulus; S130 = 1130 / Ro = 132.41 in3; DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RIO CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole 0 Old Skyway Magalia, CA Project Number 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services - Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. � I16/1 i Rogue River, OR 97537 Calc. by Date I Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Internet: www.tower-structures.com Site No C001 Pole Properties (Cont'd) cD +140.0' AGL (bottom of splice) Number of sides; n = 12; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ;wall thickness; TH140 = 0.250 in I ; Pole OD (across flats); OD140 = 24.020 in; ;Rio = OD140/2 = 12.010000 in; Ro = Rio /cos (0) = 12.433667 in; Pole IR (across flats); R1i = Rio - TH140 = 11.760000 in; Ri = R1i / cos (0) = 12.174848 in; Ao = n x (RIO) 2 x tan (0) = 463.79 int; ; Ai = n x (Rid 2 x tan (0) = 444.68 int; net Area,, A14onet = Ao - Ai = 19.11 in 2; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 6.436140 in; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 6.302165 in; net moment of Inertia; 1140 = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - ao2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R,2 - a,?) / 24) = 1381.94 in4; net section modulus; S140 = 1140 / Ro = 111.15 in3; 7a. +140.0' AGL (top of splice) i Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ; wall thickness; TH140 = 0.1875 in Pole OD (across flats); OD140 = 24.5827 in; ;Rio = OD140 / 2 = 12.291350 in; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 12.724942 in; Pole IR (across flats); R1i = Rio - TH140 = 12.103850 in; Ri = R1i /cos (¢) = 12.530828 in; Ao = n x (Rio)2 x tan (0) = 485.77 int; ; Ai = n x (R1d2 x tan (0) = 471.06 int; :net Area; A140net = Ao - AI = 14.71 in 2; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 6.586915 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 6.486434 in; net moment of Inertia; 1140 = ( Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - ( Ai x (6 x R,? - a,?) / 24) = 1120.35 in4; :net section modulus; S140 = 1140 / Ro = 88.04 in3; I r O +145.0' AGL Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ; wall thickness; TH145 = 0.1875 in I Pole OD (across flats); OD145 = 23.505 in; ;Rio = OD145 / 2 = 11.752500 in; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 12.167083 in; ;Pole IR (across flats); R1i = R10 - TH145 = 11.565000 in; Ri = R1i/cos (o) = 11.972969 in; Ao = n x (RIO) 2 x tan (o) = 444.11 int; ; Ai = n x (Rid 2 x tan (0) = 430.06 int; net Area; A145net = Ao - A, = 14.06 in i ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 6.298146 in; ;ai = 2 x Ri•x sin (0) = 6.197665 in; ;net moment of Inertia; 1145 = (Ao x (6 x R 2_ a 2) / 24) ( Ai x (6 x R 2 - a,?) / 24) = 978.34 in4; 3 ;net section modulus; S145 = 1145 / Ro = 80.41 in; ' DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RI ! CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole - 1 Old Skyway Magalia, CA Project Number 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services - Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. Rogue River, OR 97537 17/1 Calc. by Date Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Internet: www.tower-structures.com Site No C001 Pole Properties (cont'd) +155.0' AGL ; Number of sides; n = 12; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ;wall thickness; TH155 = 0.1875 in Pole OD (across flats); OD155 = 21.348 in; ;Rio = OD155 / 2 = 10.674000 in; ; Ro = Rio / cos (o) = 11:050538 in; Pole IR (across flats); Rii = Rio - TH155 = 10.486500 in; Ri = R1i/cos (0) = 10.856424 in; Ao = n x (Ro)2 x tan (0) = 366.34 int; ; Ai = n x (Rid 2 x tan (0) = 353.59 int; net Area; A 155net = Ao - Ai = 12.76 int ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 5.720179 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 5.619698 in; net moment of Inertia; 1155 = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (Ai x (6 x Rig - a,?) / 24) = 731.19 in4; :net section modulus; S155 = 1155 / Ro = 66.17 in3; +160.0' AGL Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ; wall thickness; TH160 = 0.1875 in Pole OD (across flats); OD160 = 20.270 in; ; Rio = OD160 / 2 = 10.135000 in; ; Ro = Rio / cos (0) = 10.492524 in, - ; n; ; Pole IR (across flats): Rii = Rio - TH16o = 9.947500 in; Ri = Rii / cos (0) = 10.298410 in; ;Ao = n x (RIO) 2 x tan (0) = 330.28 in 2; ;Ai = n x (Rid2 x tan (0) = 318.17 int; net Area: A160, et = Ao - Ai = 12.11 int ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 5.431330 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 5.330849 in; net moment of Inertia; 1160 = ( Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R,? - a,?) / 24) = 625.04 in4; net section modulus; S160 = 1160 / Ro = 59.57 in3, (C� +165.0' AGL ; Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ; wall thickness; TH165 = 0.1875 in ; Pole OD (across flats); OD165 = 19.192 in; ; Rio = OD165/2 = 9.596000 in; Ro = Rio /cos (0) = 9.934510 in; Pole IR (across flats); R1i = Rio - TH165 = 9.408500 in; Ri = Rri / cos (0) = 9.740396 in; Ao = n x (Rio)2 x tan (0) = 296.08 int; :Ai = n x (Rid2 x tan (0) = 284.63 int; net Area; A165net = Ao - Ai = 11.46 in 2; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 5.142481 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 5.042000 in; net moment of Inertia; 1165 = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R,? - a,?) / 24) = 529.70 in4: net section modulus: S165 = 1165 / Ro = 53-3203; DAVIDSON E N G I N E E R1O I CIVIL /STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole -1 Old Skyway Magalia, CA Project Number 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services - Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. 296 Covered Bridge Road Rogue River, OR 97537 18/1 Calc. by Date Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Internet: www.tower-structures.com Site No C001 Pole Properties (cont'd) i +175.0' AGL Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; :wall thickness; TH175 = 0.1875 in Pole OD (across flats); OD175 = 17.035 in; ;Rio = OD175/2 = 8.517500 in; Ro = Rio /cos (0) = 8.817965 in; Pole IR (across flats); R1i = Rio - TH175 = 8.330000 in; Ri = R1i /cos (0) = 8.623851 in; i Ao = n x (Rio)2 x tan (0) = 233.27 int; ; A, = n x (R1;)2 x tan (0) = 223.11 int; net Area; A 175net = Ao - Ai = 10.16 in 2; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 4.564514 in; a, = 2 x Ri x sin (0) = 4.464034 in; net moment of Inerlia; 1175 = ( Ao x (6 x R 2 - ao2) / 24) - (A, x (6 x R,? - a,?) / 24) = 369.04 in°; i :net section modulus; 5175 = 1175 / Ro = 41.85 in3; 0) +180.0' AGL Number of sides; n = 12; ; 0 = 180 / n = 15.00 deg; ; wall thickness; TH180 = 0.1875 in Pole OD (across flats); OD18o = 16.000 in; :Rio = ODr8o / 2 = 8.000000 in; Ro = Rio /cos (0) = 8.282209 in; Pole IR (across flats); R1i = Rio - TH1ao = 7.812500 in; Ri = R1i / cos (0) = 8.088095 in; Ao = n x (Rio) 2 x tan (0) = 205.78 int; ; Ai = n x (Rid 2 x tan (0) = 196.25 int; net Area; A18onet = Ao - Ai = 9.53 int; ao = 2 x Ro x sin (0) = 4.287187 in; ; ai = 2 x Ri x sin (rpj = 4.186706 in; net moment of Inertia; I18o = (Ao x (6 x R 2 - a 2) / 24) - (Aix (6 x R,2 - a,?) / 24) = 305.13 in'; ;net section modulus; S18o = 118o / Ro = 36.84 in3; DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RI CIVIL /STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole- 1 Id Skyway Magalia, CA Project Number 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services -Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. 296 Covered Bridge Road V45 = 9.787 kips ; OTM45 = 8018.274 ; kip - in Bottom of Member 16; P75 = 9.432 kips; 19/1 Rogue River, OR 97537 Calc. by Date V105 = 5.636 kips; OTM1o5 = 2376.651 ; kip - in Bottom of Member 30; P145 = 1.798 kips ; V145 = 2.122 kips ; Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Internet: www.tower-structures.com Site No C001 Pole Bending Stress Check (@ 75 MPH basic wind speed) Allowable pole bending stress check is in conformance, with EIA 222-F Table 5, page 17 for 12 -sided polygonal tubular pole sections. The stress check equations are based on the EPRI report TLMRC-87-R3 'Local Buckling Strength of Polygonal Tubular Poles', April 1987. The following forces include P -Delta effects: (in conformance with EIA 3.1.15- include secondary bending moments) Bottom of Member 1; Po = 22.437 kips ; Vo = 12.771 kips ; OTMo = 14089.475 ; kip - in Bottom of Member 10; P45 = 13.796 kips; V45 = 9.787 kips ; OTM45 = 8018.274 ; kip - in Bottom of Member 16; P75 = 9.432 kips; V75 = 7.823 kips; OTM75 = 4848.762; kip -in Bottom of Member 22; P105 = 6.308 kips; V105 = 5.636 kips; OTM1o5 = 2376.651 ; kip - in Bottom of Member 30; P145 = 1.798 kips ; V145 = 2.122 kips ; OTM145 = 476.467 ; kip - in Bottom Pole Section Bending Stress Check So = 788.90 in' ; bending stress at +0.0; fbo = OTMo / So = 17.860 kips /in2 ; w = 13.93 in; t = 0.375 in; Fy = 65 ksi; Slenderness Ratio; SR = (Fy),/2 x w/t = 299.49; > 240 section is non -compact; Allowable Bending Stress: Fb = 0.870 x Fy x (1.0 - 0.00129 x SR) = 34.703 ksi; > ; fbo = 17.860 ksi; OK Mid Lower Pole Section Bending Stress Check ; S45 = 496.87 in ; bending stress at +45'; fb45 = OTM45 / S45 = 16.138 kips / in2 ; ;w = 11.56 in; t = 0.34375 in; Fy = 65 ksi; Slenderness Ratio; SR = (Fy)1 a x w / t = 271.13; > 240 section is non -compact; Allowable Bending Stress; Fb = 0.870 x Fy x (1.0 - 0.00129 x SR) = 36.771 ksi; > ; fb45 = 16.138 ksi; OK Middle Pole Section Bending Stress Check S75 = 305.70 in ; bending stress at +75'; fb75 = OTM75 / S75 = 15.861 kips / in2 ; w = 10.02 in; t = 0.28125 in; Fy = 65 ksi; Slenderness Ratio; SR = (Fy)�� x w / t = 287.23; > 240 section is non -compact; Allowable Bending Stress; Fb = 0.870 x Fy x (1.0 - 0.00129 x SR) = 35.597 ksi; > ; fb75 = 15.861 ksi; OK Mid Upper Pole Section Bending Stress Check S1o5 = 193.70 in ; bending stress at +105'; fb105 = OTM1o5 / S1o5 = 12.270 kips / in2 ; ;w = 8.465 in; t = 0.250 in; Fy = 65 ksi; Slenderness Ratio; SR= (Fy)1 x w / t = 272.99; > 240 section is non -compact; ;Allowable Bending Stress; Fb = 0.870 x Fy x (1.0 - 0.00129 x SR) = 36.636 ksi; > ; fb1o5 = 12.270 ksi; OK Upper Pole Section Bending Stress Check S145 = 80.41 in' ; bending stress at +145'; fb145 = OTM145 / S145 = 5.925 kips / in2 ; w = 6.298 in; t = 0.1875 in; Fy = 65 ksi; Slenderness Ratio; SR = (Fy)1n x w / It = 270.81; > 240 section is non -compact; Allowable Bending Stress; Fb = 0.870 x Fy x (1.0 - 0.00129 x SR) = 36.795 ksi; > ; fb145 = 5.925 ksi; OK Strength of pole sections exceed required bending strength throughout height of pole DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RI CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole - Old Skyway Magalia, CA Project Number 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services —Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. Rogue River, OR 97537 20/1 Calc. by Date Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Internet: www.tower-structures.com Site No C001 Check Pole Deflections 0 50 MPH basic wind speed Tower Nodal Rotations Node 33 @ +160'; X33 = 2.4068 degrees ; @ 75 MPH basic wind speed; ; Node 33 @ +160'; X33 = 1.0697 degrees ; @ 50 MPH basic wind speed; 4 ft diameter MW dish Dish Frequencies Node 33: 4 ft MW dish frequency; Fig = 10.7 GHz ; From Nomograph Figure C3 on page 75 of EIA 222-F; ; Permissible 4 foot diameter 10.7 GHz dish rotation @ +160' ; itiallow = 1.4 degrees; > ; 1.0697 degrees from ca/c's Antenna rotation acceptable per EIA 222-F standards Furthermore, from Sheet 1 of 2 of structural drawing prepared by Engineering Endeavors, Inc. by MJC on 02107/92: Allowable Rotation; allow = 1.48 degrees ; @ 50 MPH basic wind speed; for 4 ft diameter MW dish @ +160' AGL Therefore, pole stiffness adequate for maintaining communication path of 4 foot diameter MW dishdo +160' AGL DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RI N CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole — 13 Vd Skyway Magalia, CA Project Number 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services — Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. 296 Covered Bridge Road 21 /1 Rogue River, OR 97537 Calc. by Date Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Internet: www.tower-structures.com Site No C001 Check Existing Foundations Bottom of Member 1; Po = 22.437 kips; Vo = 12.771 kips; OTMo = 14089.475; kip —in Refer to geotechnical engineering report prepared by LRA Engineering (Laver Roper and Associates, Sacramento, CA): LRA Soil Report dated March 9, 1992 Foundation design is in accordance with EIA 222-E. Check Existing 7'0" diameter by 21'0" deep pier cast -in -drilled -hole a 2-1/4" diameter 9'6" long ASTM 5 Gr 75 anchor bolts 60.5" di am B. C. ni mum 7'0" diameter y 21'0" deep concrete er CI DH, f c' = 4,000 psi ) each #11 bar 2 r t i cal s - Gr 60 hoop stirrups 12" oc wi-th lap splice DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RI CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole— 1 Id Skyway Magalia, CA Project Number 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services —Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. 296 Covered Bridge Road Rogue River, OR 97537 22/1 Calc. by Date fel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Internet: www.tower-structures.com Site No C001 Soil Pressure Diagram; 22.437 kips 14089. 475 ki p -i n i 12. 771 ki ps I I o N e i N Ln O N N O 00 �D I - O I N - O O 00 co N I q 2 q1 DAVIDSON E N G I N E E RI CIVIL /STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 296 Covered Bridge Road Project: Review (Existing) 180 Foot Steel Pole - Old Skyway Magalia, CA Project Number 393-01 Client: AT&T Wireless Services -Jim Daniel Sheet no./rev. Rogue River, OR 97537 23/1 Calc. by Date Tel: (541) 582-8074 Fax: (541) 582-0072 DWD 12 -March -2001 Magalia Site Internet: www.tower-structures.com Site No C001 Check Equivalent Fluid Pressure exerted on 4'6"o by 17'3" deep concrete pier ,-From Rankine Theory (cohesionless soils), refer to attached figure on page 22: :EM=0: 14089.475 + 12.771 x252 - 0.50 x q, x 126 x 168.00 - 0.50 x q, x42 x112.00 + 0.5 x q, x 84.00 x 28.0 = 0; Solve for q,: 14089.475 + 12.771 x252 = 0.50 x q, x 126 x 168.00 + 0.50 x q, x42 x 112.00 - 0.5 x q, x84.00 x28.0 ; 14089.4 75 + 12.771 x252 = ( 0.50 x 126 x 168.00 + 42.0 x 0.5 x 112.0 - 0.5 x 84.00 x 28.0) x q, ; q, = (14089.475 + 12.771 x252) / (0.50x 126 x 168.00 + 42.0 x 0.5 x 112.0 - 0.5 x 84.00 x 28.0) = 1.4717 ;kips per inch d = 252 in p = (q, 1d) x 144 / 7.0 ft = 0.1201 ksf,- Factor of Safety; FS = 0.200 /= 1.665; > ; 1.5 OK 0.1201 Existing 7'0"$ by 21'0" deep concrete pier cast -in -drilled -hole OK Concrete Vertical Steel Reinforcing Design ; vo = 12.771 kips; ; OTMo = 14089.475: kip -ft ; ; Po = 22.437 kips ; effective OTM; OTMEFF = OTMo + 4.50 in x Vo = 14146.945: kip -ft; Check bar force while neglecting bending resistance contribution of concrete, take 20 bars effective in resisting moment with 75.5 inch bar diameter; max Tension per bar with; n = 20; D = 75.500 in Tmax = 4 x OTMEFF / (n x D) = 37.475; kips; ; Abar = rr/ 4 x (11/8)2 = 1.4849 int; bar stress; ft = Tmax / Abar = 25.238; ksi; < allowable; Ft = , 0.60 x 60 x 4/3 = 48.000: ksi; OK No shear reinforcing required by inspection; Existing 7'0"$ by 21'0" deep concrete pier cast -in -drilled -hole with 20 each #11 verts and #4 closed loop ties at 12 inches on center max. OK 4 • MagaTia, CA - 180 ft tall Power Structures Inc. Steel Segmented Pole Sunday, February 11, 2001 Page 1 of 1 Multiframe4D Version 7.5 C:\Multiframe4D V7.5\DE 180 ft Pole MagaliaCA AT&T Wireless 393-01.mfd 16 O 37 n at. _.. _.p,. lii3, 36 1'15 �Iv�f41k'C.t' 315 y 3� 110 1 34 33 ra— ME:r+n�iec aJ 0�0 1 blur-Nbe r 32 ?r -L Is -5 311 S1 ISO 1 30 ' C3 14ea 219 2'1 140 za 27 Z'I 1.50 26 �b j6S 215 t 2C7 1 24 213 22 211 20 1 1 9 -- �IeV4�'lell� 18- Ila a7 117 I'l 80 16 1(a 115 10 1 14 14 (s 1 13 GO 112 (-L 55 111 t t 5" 10 to A5 1 9 9 A0 I 8 6 5 4 3 1 y 1 t o x Multiframe Summary Total Load including all DL's and 75 MPH Wind Magalia, CA 0180 ft tall Power Structures Inc. Ste0egmented Pole Monday, February 12, 2001 Page 1 of 7 Multiframe4D Version 7.5 DE 180 ft Pole MagaliaCA AT&T Wireless 393-01 Project Details Title: Magalia Site - 180 ft tall steel pole - Power Structures Client: AT&T Wireless Services Site: Magalia - C001 Building: 180 foot tall pole - Power Structures, Inc. Description: Design Details Job ID: 393-01 Version: 1 Company: DAVIDSON ENGINEERING Designed by: DWD Checked by: DWD Notes: Add 12 ea SC100-13Din and full sector mount at +125' AGL Joint Coordinates (in) Joint Label x Y z Type 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Rigid 2 0.0000 60.0000 0.0000 Rigid 3 0.0000 120.0000 0.0000 Rigid 4 0.0000 180.0000 0.0000 Rigid 5 0.0000 240.0000 0.0000 Rigid 6 0.0000 300.0000 0.0000 Rigid 7 0.0000 .360.0000 0.0000 Rigid 8 0.0000 420.0000 0.0000 Rigid 9 0.0000 480.0000 0.0000 Rigid 10 0.0000 540.0000 0.0000 Rigid 11 0.0000 600.0000 0.0000 Rigid 12 0.0000 660.0000 0.0000 Rigid 13 0.0000 720.0000 0.0000 Rigid 14 0.0000 780.0000 0.0000 Rigid 15 0.0000 840.0000 0.0000 Rigid 16 0.0000 900.0000 0.0000 Rigid 17 0.0000 960.0000 0.0000 Rigid 18 0.0000 1020.0000 0.0000 Rigid 19 0.0000 1080.0060 0.0000 Rigid 20 0.0000 1140.0000 0.0000 Rigid 21 0.0000 '1200.0000 0.0000 Rigid 22 0.0000 1260.0000 0.0000 Rigid 23 0.0000 1320.0000 0.0000 Rigid 24 0.0000 1380.0001 0.0000 Rigid 25 0.0000 1440.0000 0.0000 Rigid 26 0.0000 1500.0000 0.0000 Rigid 27 0.0000 1560.0000 0.0000 Rigid 28 0.0000 1619.9999 0.0000 Rigid 29 0.0000 1680.0000 0.0000 Rigid 30 0.0000 1740.0000 0.0000 Rigid 31 0.0000 1800.0000 0.0000 Rigid 32 0.0000 1859.9999 0.0000 Rigid 33 0.0000 1920.0000 0.0000 Rigid 34 0.0000 1980.0000 0.0000 Rigid 35 0.0000 2040.0000 0.0000 Rigid 36 0.0000 2099.9999 0.0000 Rigid 37 0.0000 2160.0001 0.0000 Rigid 38 0.0000 2141.9999 0.0000 Rigid Member Geometry (in,deg) Member Label Jointl Joint2 Length Slope Orient. 1 1 2 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 2 2 3 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 3 3 4 60'.0000 90.0000 0.0000 4 4 5 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 5 5 6 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 6 6 7 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 7 8 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 8 8 9 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 9 9 10 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 10 10 11 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000, 11 11 12 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 12 12 13 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 13 13 14 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 14 14 15 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 Multiframe Summary -- Total Load including all DL's and 75 MPH Wind Magalia, CA 180 ft tall Power Structures Inc. St *Segmented Pole Monday, February 12, 2001 MultiErame4D Version 7.5 Page 2 of 7 i5 DE 180 ft Pole MagaliaCA AT&T Wireless 393-01 16 15 16 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 17 16 17 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 18 17 18 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 19 18 19 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 20 19 20 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 21 20 21 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 22 21 22 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 23 22 23 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 "4 23 24 60.0001 90.0000 0.0000 25 24 25 60.0000 90.0000 0'.0000 26 25 26 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 26 27 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 `7 28 27 28 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 29 28 29 60.0001 90.0000 0.0000 30 29 30 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 31 30 31 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 32 31 32 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 33 32 33 60.0001 90.0000 0.0000 34 33 34 60.0000 90.0000 m oob 35 34 35 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 36 35 36 60.0000 90.0000 0.0000 37 36 38 42.0000 90.0000 0.0000 38 37 18.0001 90.0000 0.0000 Member Types Member Label 1 Ox' 0y' 0z' Member Type Self weight Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 3 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 4 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 6 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 7 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 8 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 9 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 10 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 11 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 12 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 13 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 14 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 15 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 16 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 17 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 18 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 19 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 20 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 21 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 22 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 23 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 24 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 25 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 26 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 27 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 28 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 29 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 30 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 31 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 3=' Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 33 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 34 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 35 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 36 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic 37 Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Rigid/Rigid Normal Static & Dynamic Member Sections Member Label Group Section 1 Custom3 ly12 52.00" x 3/8" 2 Custom3 y12 50.944" x 3/8" 3 Custom3 y12 50.944" x 3/8" 4 Custom3 y12 48.832" x 3/8" 5 Custom3 y12 46.719" x 3/8" 6 Custom3 y12 46.719" x 3/8" 7 Custom3 y12 44.607" x 3/8" 8 Custom3 y12 44.607" x 3/8" Multiframe Summary -- Total Load including all DL's and 75 MPH Wind There are no springs Joint Loads(lbf,lbf-in) TL (DL + 75MPH WInd) Joint Label Load Mag 2 PX 705.7700 4 Px 676.5100 Multiframe Summary -- Total Load including all DL's and 75 MPH Wind Magalia, CA 180 ft tall Power Structures Inc. Stegmented Pole Monday, February 12, 2001 Page 3 of 7 Multiframe4D Version 7.5 DE 180 ft Pole MagaliaCA AT&T Wireless 393-01 9 Custom3 2 43.152" x 11/32" 10 Custom3 2 43.152" x 11/32" 11 Custom3 2 40.983" x 11/32" 12 Custom3 2 40.983" x 11/32" 13 Custom3 2 38.814" x 11/32" 14 Custom3 2 38.814" x 11/32" 15 Custom3 12 38.477" x 9/32" 16 Custom3 12 37.395" x 9/32" 17 Custom3 12 35.231" x 9/32" 18 Custom3 12 35.231" x 9/32" 19 Custom3 2 33.067" x 9/32" 20 Custom3 2 13.067" x 9/32" 21 Custom3 2 30.903" x 9/32" 22 Custom3 2 30.903" x 9/32" 23 Custom3 12 30.509" x 1/4" 24 Custom3 12 28.346" x 1/4" 25 Custom3 12 27.265" x 1/4" 26 Custom3 12 26.183" x 1/4" 27 Custom3 12 26.183" x 1/4" 28 Custom3 12 24.020" x 1/4" 29 Custom3 12 24.020" x 1/4" 30 Custom3 2 23.505" x 3/16" 31 Custom3 2 23.505" x 3/16" 32 Custom3 2 21.348" x 3/16" 33 Custom3 2 20.270" x 3/16" 34 Custom3 2 19.192" x 3/16" 35 Custom3 2 19.192" x 3/16" 36 Custom3 2 17.035" x 3/16" 37 Custom3 12 16.00" x 3/16" Section Properties Section A Ix Iy J E G in^2 in^4 in^4 in^4 psi psi 12 52.00" x 3/8" 62.2539 21233.4431 21233.4431 42466.8862 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 2 50.944" x 3/8" 60.9738 19956.5367 19956.5367 39913.0735 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 2 48.832" x 3/8" 58.4337 17559.4117 17559.4117 35118.8234 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 2 46.719" x 3/8" 55.8835 15361.1334 15361.1334 30722.2669 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 2 44.607" x 3/8" 53.3334 13355.3508 13355.3508 26710.7017 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 43.152" x 11/32" 47.3230 11097.7859 11097.7859 22195.5718 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 40.983" x 11/32" 44.9228 9494.9737 9494.9737 18989.947.5 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 38.814" r. 11/32" 42.5227 8054.4392 8054.4392 16108.8784 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 38.477" x 9/32" 34.5422 6449.7673 6449.7673 12899.5346 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 37.395" x 9/32" 33.5621 5917.0461 5917.0461 11834.0923 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 35.231" x 9/32" 31.6120 4941.2378 4941.2378 9882.4756 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 33.067" x 9/32" 29.6519 4079.0908 4079.0908 8158.1816 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 30.903" x 9/32" 27.6917 3323.5463 3323.5463 6647.0927 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 30.509" x 1/4" 24.3215 2850.4709 2850.4709 5700.9419 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 28.346" x 1/4" 22.5814 2281.8727 2281.8727 4563.7455 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 27.265" x 1/4" 21.7214 2028.5013 2028.5013 4057.0026 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 26.183" x 1/4" 20.8513 1794.4085 1794.4085 3588.8169 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 24.020" x 1/4" 19.1112 1381.8386 1381.8386 2763.6772 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 23.505" x 3/16" 14.0609 978.2683 978.2683 1956.5366 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 21.348" x 3/16" 12.7608 731.1364 731.1364 1462.2728 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 20.270" x 3/16" 12.1108 624.9942 624.9942 1249.9883 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 19.192" x 3/16" 11.4607 529.6612 529.6612 1059.3224 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 17.035" x 3/16" 10.1606 369.0130 369.0130 738.0259 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 16.00" x 3/16" 9.5306 305.1076 305.1076 610.2153 2.9501e+007 1.1400e+007 Total Mass (lb) 20584.0975 Joint Restraints and Prescribed Displacements (in,deg) Joint Label Joint Axes dx dy dz Ox 0y Oz 1 Local 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 There are no springs Joint Loads(lbf,lbf-in) TL (DL + 75MPH WInd) Joint Label Load Mag 2 PX 705.7700 4 Px 676.5100 Multiframe Summary -- Total Load including all DL's and 75 MPH Wind There are no prescribed joint displacements in TL (DL + 75MPH WInd) Member Loads (lbf,lbf-in) TL (DL + 75MPH WInd) Member Label Load Shape Magalia, CA 180 ft tall Power Structures Inc. Stegmented Pole 0 Monday, February 12, 2001 0.0000 - - - 2 Mul.tiframe4D Version 7.5 Uniform Page 4 of 7 DE 180 ft Pole MagaliaCA AT&T Wireless 393-01 6 Px 647.2500 8 Px 502.7700 9 Px 452.1100 11 Px 655.1000 13 Px 654.8100 15 Px 654.1100 17 Px 647.3100 19 Px 629.6400 21 Px 607.8100 22 Px 301.3500 24 Px 582.0300 26 Px 552.2400 28 Px 519.7200 29 Px 252.9600 31 Px 478.8200 33 Px 441.0900 35 Px 401.3300 38 Px 185.2200 38 Px 282.0000 26 Px 1607.0000 33 Px 334.0000 38 Py -168.0000 33 Py -170.0000 26 Py -1515.0000 There are no prescribed joint displacements in TL (DL + 75MPH WInd) Member Loads (lbf,lbf-in) TL (DL + 75MPH WInd) Member Label Load Shape Left Dist Right Dist Left Mag Right Mag 1 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 2 Wx'. Uniform 0.0000 - - - 3 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 5 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 6 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 7 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 8 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 9 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 10 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 11 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 12 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 13 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 14 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 15 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - '-6 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 17 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 18 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 19 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 20 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 21 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 2-2 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 23 Wx' Uniform - 24 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 25 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 26 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 27 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - I8 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 29 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 30 Wx' Uniform - 11 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 32 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 33 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 34 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 35 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 36 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 37 Wx' Uniform 0.0000 - - - 1 Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - 2 Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - 3 Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - 4 Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - 5 Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - 6 Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - 7 Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - 8 Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Multiframe Summary -- Total Load including all DL's and 75 MPH Wind Magalia, Monday, February 12, 2001 Multiframe4D Version 7.5 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 CA 0 180 ft tall Power Structures Inc. Ste* egmented Pole There are no thermal loads in TL (DL + 75MPH WInd) Analysis Settings Load Case LC Type Analysis TL (DL + 75MPH WInd) Static Nonlinear Options Settings P.-d,P-D Incs=1, Tot=1.0000e-003 Joint Displacements (in,deg) Page 5 of 7 DE 180 ft Pole MagaliaCA AT&T Wireless 393-01 Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform O.Ob00 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - Wy Uniform 0.0000 - - - There are no thermal loads in TL (DL + 75MPH WInd) Analysis Settings Load Case LC Type Analysis TL (DL + 75MPH WInd) Static Nonlinear Options Settings P.-d,P-D Incs=1, Tot=1.0000e-003 Joint Displacements (in,deg) Joint Label Load Case dx' dy' dz' Bx' Oy' Oz' 1 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0393 -0.0007 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.0744 3 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.1568 -0.0017 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.1493 4 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.3506 -0.0030 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.2201 5 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.6212 -0.0048 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.2960 6 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.9744 -0.0076 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.3777 7 d) (P-d,P-D) 1.4106 -0.0113 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.4545 8 d) (P-d,P-D) 1.9304 -0.0164 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.5373 9 d) (P-d,P-D) 2.5340 -0.0231 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.6147 10 d) (P-d,P-D) 3.2238 -0.0316 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.7017 11 d) (P-d,P-D) 4.0014 -0.0423 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.7826 12 d) (P-d,P-D) 4.8673 -0.0553 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.8703 13 d) (P-d,P-D) 5.8215 -0.0710 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.9513 14 d) (P-d,P-D) 6.8643 -0.0897 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1.0393 15 d) (P-d,P-D) 7.9953 -0.1115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1.1200 16 d) (P-d,P-D) 9.2168 -0.1370 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1.2120 17 d) (P-d,P-D) 10.5341 -0.1664 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1.3031 18 d) (P-d,P-D) 11.9508 -0.2004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1.4016 19 d) (P-d,P-D) 13.4652 -0.2392 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1.4900 20 d) (P-d,P-D) 15.0759 -0.2830 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1.5854 21 d) (P-d,P-D) 16.7804 -0.3319 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1.6695 22 d) (P-d,P-D) 18.5761 -0.3862 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1.7596 23 d) (P-d,P-D) 20.4595 -0.4458 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1.8374 24 d) (P-d,P-D) 22.4241 -0.5106 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1.9143 25 d) (P-d,P-D) 24.4705 -0.5810 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1.9938 26 d) (P-d,P-D) 26.5963 -0.6568 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2.0657 27 d) (P-d,P-D) 28.7934 -0.7377 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2.1314 28 d) (P-d,P-D) 31.0533 -0.8231 •0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2.1858 2.9 d) (P-d,P-D) 33.3716 -0.9131 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2.2431 30 d) (P-d,P-D) 35.7436 -1.0072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2.2889 31 d) (P-d,P-D) 38.1659 -1.1054 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2.3385 32 d) (P-d,P-D) 40.6325 -1.2072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2.3745 33 d) (P-d,P-D) 43.'1352 -1.3119 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2.4068 34 d) (P-d,P-D) 45.6666 -1.4191 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2.4305 Multiframe Summary -- Total Load including all DL's and 75 MPH Wind Joint Reactions (lbf,lbf-in) Load Case Px' Vy' Vz' Tx' --- Joint Label Magalia, CA180 9Page ft tall Power Structures Inc. Ste gmented Pole Mz' y Monday, February 12, 2001 -12401.8080 22432.3061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3927271.3564 2 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0003 -0.0015 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.0000 6 of 7 Multiframe4D Version 7.5 -0.0001 -0.0024 0.0000 DE 180 ft Pole MagaliaCA AT&T Wireless 393-01 35 d) (P-d,P-D) 48.2192 -1.5279 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2.4470 36 d) (P-d,P-D) 50.7837 -1.6378 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2.4545 37 d) (P-d,P-D) 53.3535 -1.7481 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2.4567 38 d) (P-d,P-D) 52.5824 -1.7150 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2.4567 Joint Reactions (lbf,lbf-in) Load Case Px' Vy' Vz' Tx' --- Joint Label Load Case Rx' Ry' Rz' Mx' My' Mz' 1 d) (P-d,P-D) -12401.8080 22432.3061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3927271.3564 2 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0003 -0.0015 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.0000 3 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0001 -0.0024 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1063 4 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0010 -0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1.1063 5 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0001 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0006 -0.0175 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0001 0.0282 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.0000 18242.9623 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0004 -0.0386 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -17293.1162 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0003 0.0390 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5532 10 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0011 -0.0882 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.0000 1.1 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0002 -0.0039 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.5532 12 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0024 -0.1132 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 13 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0037 0.2073 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.5532 14 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0001 0.0010 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 15 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0043 0.2023 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.5532 16 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0130 -0.6261 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.0000 =-7 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0087 0.4267 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.5532 18 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0119 0.4615 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.2766 19 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0110 -0.4584 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.8298 20 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0003 0.0019 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.2766 71 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0146 0.4792 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.8298 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0137 -0.4755 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.2766 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0305 0.9184 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.2766 �4 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0297 -0.9168 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.8298 25 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0327 0.8887 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.4149 26 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0320 0.8746 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.4149 =7 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0298 -0.8515 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I8 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0319 0.7949 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.6915 29 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0035 0.0425 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2074 () d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0108 0.2161 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2766 31 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0249 -0.6276 0.0000 .0.0000 0.0000 0.6223 32 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0486 1.1179 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1383 33 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0049 -0.0969 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5186 34 d) (P-d,P-D) 0.0446 1.0134 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5100 35 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0485 -1.1096 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6828 ,6 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0363 -0.8310 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5402 j7 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0009 -0.0211 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 38 d) (P-d,P-D) -0.0625 -1.4267 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1143 Sum of Reactions (lbf,lbf-in) TL (DL + 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) Rx. -12401.8080 Ry 22432.3061 Rz 0.0000 Member Actions (lbf,lbf-in) 'Member Load Case Px' Vy' Vz' Tx' My' Mz' 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 22424.1761 12416.5014 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 13927271.3564 -21366.0423 -12416.5014 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000-13182281.3654 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 21351.2260 11738.5618 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 13182281.3654 -20314.8389 -11738.5618 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000-12477967.2217 3 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 20299.8927 11764.3858 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 12477968.3280 -19263.5056 -11764.3858 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000-11772105.3025 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 19251.4643 11112.5460 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 11772104.1962 -18258.2722 -11112.5460 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000-11105351.5410 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 18242.9623 11137.6675 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 11105351.5410 -17293.1162 -11137.6675 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000-10437090.9388 6 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 17282.3868 10514.3354 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10437090.9388 -16332.5407 -10514.3354 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -9806231.4053 7 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 16317.8983 10537.0894 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9806231.4053 -15411.3876 -10537.0894 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -9174006.0901 C,. 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 15401.6628 10055.8778 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9174006.0901 -14495.1522 -10055.8778 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -8570653.0368 9 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 14485.9367 9624.5984 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8570653.5900 -13681.5842 -9624.5984 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -7993177.3721 10 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 13667.3817 9644.6310 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7993177.3721 -12863.0292 -9644.6310 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -7414499.6645 11 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 12858.2695 9008.5234 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 74144991.1113 -12094.7532 -9008.5234 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -6873988.0625 Multiframe Summary -- Total Load including all DL's and 75 MPH Wind Natural Frequencies (Hz,seconds) Mode Number Frequency Period 1 0.6317 1.5830 2 0.6317 1.5830 3 2.2776 0.4391 4 Magalia, CA 0180 ft tall Power Structures Inc. Steegmented Pole to 0.1874 6 Mondav, February 12, 2001 7 9.9376 0.1006 8 9.9376 Page 7 of 7 Mul[iframe4D 16.0655 Version 7.5 10 16.0655 DE 180 ft Pole MagaliaCA AT&T Wireless 393-01 12 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 12081.3612 9026.3246 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6873988.0625 -11317.8449 -9026.3246 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -6332408.2853 13 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 11316.0982 8388.3096 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6332407.7321 -10593.3373 -8388.3096 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -5829109.6735 14 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 10580.9781 8403.8952 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5829109.6735 -9858.2171 -8403.8952 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -5324875.6478 15 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 9859.0470 7764.7861 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5324875.0946 -9271.9319 -7769.7861 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -4858988.0618 16 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 9258.8755 7779.6041 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4858988.0618 -8688.4174 -7779.6041 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -4392211.2518 ;7 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 8691.2327 7146.8581 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4392210.6986 -8153.9217 -7146.8581 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -3963399.4693 _ 18 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 8142.7102 7160.1539 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3963399.1927 -7605.3991 -7160.1539 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -3533789.7362 19 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 7610.3423 6542.9421 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3533788.9064 -7106.3482 -6542.9421 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -3141212.6592 20 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 7096.0899 6554.0680 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3141212.3826 -6592.0945 -6554.0680 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2747967.9035 21 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 6600.7852 5956.5608 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2747967.0737 -6130.1072 -5956.5608 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2390573.6752 22 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 6130.3605 5664.3350 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2390573.3986 -5659.6825 -5664.3350 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -2050713.4797 23 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 5652.9268 5671.9925 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 '2050713.2031 -5239.5312 -5671.9925 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1710392.9068 '4 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 5250.7115 5097.4637 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1710392.0770 -4866.8940 -5097.4637 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1404544.4948 25 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 4861.0244 5103.9072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1404544.0800 -4491.8248 -5103.9072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1098309.8997 26 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 3051.7514 2895.9540 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1098309.4848 -2697.3405 -2895.9540 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -924552.3354 27 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 2693.4502 2898.7786 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 924552.3354 -2339.0393 -2898.7786 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -750625.7078 28 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 2357.0995 2381.7284 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 750625.0164 -2032.2646 -2381.7284 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -607721.0381 29 75MPH wind) (P-d,P-D) 2040.1739 2130.7904 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 607721.2455 -1715.3399 -2130.7904 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -479873.9190 30 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 1713.7664 2132.2280 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 479874.1956 -1474.7727 -2132.2280 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -351940.5742 31 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 1492.2629 1654.9065 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 351941.1965 -1253.2692 -1654.9065 0..0000 0.0000 0.0000 -252646.8480 32 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 1253.3902 1655.6599 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 252646.9863 -1036.4936 -1655.6599 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -153307.2085 33 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 898.4830 874.5813 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 153307.7271 -692.6357 -874.5813 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -100832.8929 34 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 693.3415 874.8241 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100833.4028 -498.5429 -874.8241 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -48343.9873 35 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 514.4258 473.9629 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 48344.6702 -319.6273 -473.9629 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -19906.9118 36 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 318.7565 473.9898 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 19907.4520 -197.8658 -473.9898 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1143 ;,7 75MPH WInd) (P-d,P-D) 48.6191 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0:0211 -0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Natural Frequencies (Hz,seconds) Mode Number Frequency Period 1 0.6317 1.5830 2 0.6317 1.5830 3 2.2776 0.4391 4 2.2776 0.4391 5 5.3371 0.1874 6 5.3371 0.1874 7 9.9376 0.1006 8 9.9376 0.1006 9 16.0655 0.0622 10 16.0655 0.0622 Multiframe Summary -- Total Load including all DL's and 75 MPH Wind Towair Results wysiwyg://0/https://wtbjagl w.fcc.gov/IJLSTower/ RESULTS A routine check of the coordinates, heights, and structure type you provided indicates whether this structure does or does not require registration. Any "fail slope" result means that your structure requiresFAA notification and FCC registration. If all results are "pass slope", this means that the structure does not require registration, based on the information you provided. WARNING: Because the airport database we use is updated periodically, it does not take into account the most recent airport construction, nor does it include proposed airports. You still must register with the FCC if your structure is located near one of these airports or if the FAA specifically asks you to register - even if you "pass slope" in all instances. Note: Use your Browser's print function to print your TowAir results. THE INITIAL INFORMATION ENTERED: tructure does.not require c)ordinates you provided. �� , m/iGAc.:TA are no airports within 8 kilometers(5 miles) of LIUN 2 8 200 1 BUTT PtANN/N� D 1S oN 1 of 1 6/27/01 2:37 PM APPLICATION: DATE: County Offices and Cities: _ Chief Administrative Officer X_ Environmental Health Sheriff' LAFCo Biggs Oroville Irrigation District: Butte Water OWID Table Mountain Irrigation Domestic Water Butte Water District OWID Sewer COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST X_ Develop, Services Director _X Public Works DiRctor X_ Assessor_ _Y Building Manager. _ BCAG _ ALUC Air Quality Mgmt. _ Butte Co. Farm Bureau Gridley Chico _ �. Paradise _ Chico Airport Commission Animal Control Dept of Parks and Rec._ _ Biggs/W. Gridley Water _ Durham Irrigation _ Paradise Irrigation _ Richvale Irrigation _ Thermalito Irrigation _ Other _ California Water Service Co. Del Oro Water Co. Thermalito Irrigation District _ Other _ Butte Water District _ Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) _ Fire Protection _X_ California Deparanent of Forestry Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Paradise Recreation & Park Utilities Themalito Irrigation L.O.A. PUD El Medio Fire Protection District Durham Area Recreation _ Richvale Recreation & Parks Sterling City Sewer Main Feather River Rec. & Park PG&E North - Chico _ Chambers Cable TV _ Pacific Bell _ PG&E South - Oroville _ Viacom Cable TV State Agencies CalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept. of Water Resources _ Dept. of Fish and Game Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter) _ Dept of Parks and Rec._ Highway Patrol Central Reg. Water Quality Cont. _ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program Department of Conservation _ Off. of Mining Reclamation _ Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations _ Dept.Social Services, Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management _ US Fish & Wildlife Service _ Army Corps of Engineers Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. Lime Saddle Dist _ Community Association _ Mosq. Abatement. Oroville/Butte Co _ Drainage Butte Env.l Council _ Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. _ _ Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society _ Butte Co. Mining Committee _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancy School Districts 128%� lR(o3 �orl9°D t S�.00 Ioo�O l gS 00 y3. DATE RECEIPT NO. TOTAL RECEIVED PUBLIC WORKS LAFCO PLANNING PUBLIC SALES ENV. HEALTH FIRE NOE/NOD FIG FEE OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 19636 ISSUED BY S a c u -'r i f y 'e<q h a c c,dl did d. rn r rt f S!XXI �e � AT�& T�WIRELESS,SERVICES /,� fid, ` �' �� ` SIYEDEVELOPM9NTN"N� '/`P.,O.BO(97042°C'o` y� IaRKLAND WAS 98083' ' � �', � r <�y' 19-V1250 WA S PAY TO THE ORDER OF r DOLLARS BankofAmerica. Co—emal A.L 08&983 Washington, a �, Coo i�=/�!I�'dgc . FOR �/i �;� wP y ga �> 00 i,6,204us 1: L 2 50000.241: .6a!1- � °L911 s .G �•���'�`Q'�,`�d,ti,' ate: ; �'> � ' � �� .>a n���,�°r>�`a'=°3���^d'_ - ` 3 . w O 0 O z M co C:) Q LLJ Z ZD Z CIO W 112 OF NW 114 OF SEC. 31 T -23N. R.4E M.D.B..&M. [58-1 &ft Cwnty Awesw-ls Atop Book 666 Pop 47 WM- IMM para6 as for 0r�r- a* mdmW-rot wmft* CFJ= fff sw REMM fidSur cwr� am# s RED MIM Lo &ft Cwnty Awesw-ls Atop Book 666 Pop 47 WM- IMM para6 as for 0r�r- a* mdmW-rot wmft* CFJ= fff sw REMM fidSur cwr� am# s RED Betts, Steve , From: �` -Betts, Steve Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 11:26 AM To: 'cpadave@mediaone.net' Subject: New antennas David, The Planning Division, with assistance from the County Counsel's office, has reviewed all the information you submitted on the four tower sites and has made the following determinations: Bloomer Mountain Site The existing towers on Bloomer Mountain are considered to be an antenna farm, since there are three or more towers on the parcel. Replacement of the existing antenna will require an Administrative Permit. Approval is granted by the Planning staff, and does not require a hearing by the Planning Manager or the Planning Commission. However, the same information that is required for a Minor Use Permit or Use Permit - photosimulations, RF analysis, tower structural analysis, etc - must be submitted. Ophir Road Site The parcel is zoned AR -2.5 and replacement of the existing antenna will require approval of a Use Permit. Durham -Dayton Site This parcel is zoned A-10 and replacement of the existing antenna will require approval of a Use Permit. County Counsel determined that replacement of an antenna where there is a change in the visual appearance and the power output is to be considered as a new tower. Magalia Site The parcel that this tower sits on has two different zoning districts, and I am not sure what zone the tower lies in (we discussed this issue at the counter). I scaled it out on the site plan for the Use Permit and it appears that the lease area is in both zoning districts - C-2 and AR -1, but I don't know if the site plan I used is accurate. If the lease area is in the C-2 zone a Minor Use Permit is required. If the lease area is in the AR -1 zone, a Use Permit is required. If the lease area is bisected by the C-2/AR-1 zones, then a Use Permit is required. I think I covered all the sites. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about the above or about submitting applications for the new antennas. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division (530) 538-7153 m I I i I I 1 rTIz — U A2y \cn n O Or '. �� \ +. r Ir \ r I ` / LI0 > I .OT NO. 33 PROPERTY LINE '0 LINES EXISTING MAINT. BUILDING 1200 SQ. FT PROPOSED 1 200 SQ. FT. PROPOSED PROPOSED 10'x10' C PROPOSED 180' TOWER f�• >!I '^�, •U'v� �5 ..!•. .. fir• ais. Zi • ` �`; '..� , ;jam. Act& FM Cyj iYt :0 a z z � °t ' - fel c y.++x 7 . •. ry•�fit .6 tz a ti i� toco C*4 Ali i �, � +�. • tip, : �" r i � cx. J - . t ��`� � � ;,� {ter f 1 � . t. {. • � � f �� � _f�l� .� - .�1 eR. � �, ' '.. �� '�! . r.'�,, • , ''� '1 1' ,�., , �, ,�f�`l�..° t 'uit--,�' `�` wM .y • • � t 1i x � ��i �i i',• •. �' !'.' q�#`• '� Y Y,�'( � ``L'j+'7gf^^�l"�h„LLn ;,,•� , '•1.t ,' �� `4•d' Y• "�'^ � ,. x t.�. - „�' ' `���r j••� . fin �k ,.v. ,, �. ..R 4 `1k •.� wi`,e `• ,� + r. �r t �{ r • P t•I.. `� i ri IN , t•' � -. � Mit �. � .Y. ' K! .� t � Wi ` � � � � •• All iL .� � jig• �1 .z r ''�'�” r. �• � Y » ♦• � .. p. ' � � - � .. _ >; ,� %�•1,� '' � ... � •t 3 k 9 .'' # �{ �(.�' K ala. Qya orf. �,g`' • E AN • �r *� `7 1C ,g ION ��� ♦fig, ���,c • oco< a • G) ONcOt i� iNC' Q PQn`�`PC\C'r ION s kv OCG 0� �cr 3 c •*'� J �c` °��1G�'�c �� �`� �G`3� • p\�,�P ����C�`C- Q PQ�`� p o���``'�G ���PC'�C PQ�� p 0��� ♦��C� ��AC e C MA(oi'AI A J' i -FT 87 't C, A-, :�` ter` -` - `-�, � � .,,�, �f �, ter_• y; � `,r y r ..'+ �t ;� 3 '� x ��."Cl�,�n - j fit• �'�- .. - �rr .1 Oc ICT Ir .._.�,. , �.-V.,.or � - Yom, -. 4�►��.•�S�oi-� � -sx .?,P. It 011 i:..; T �S l' . ALA AF �u O mac`' e UJ O V. C nl 05 5 �iti�rG3�oe •K_ n ONt<` n.� ��c off. •� cGa • vii iii' �.' + ftp � ��t' `.�, o !Yrs + t �� . � + 4. v T • ,�.� � U `��G`ao��rGac�`� .� �` ``�G�ao��t Gat�`o ;, •�� UJ �a�)3re- M pog``'o- C� S %e • "O \G�ao� \l'G'(t` ��,. �I U ```G�ao� �C)3it` y�•t � ��'\`�� o�r'ot ; got -� �� �: �•�ot `►���`Gao•`e�i �,�.� � j � `t`ao6�)J,���> ���.. �, V ; \G��o�t�`Gatt`e�, ��� �C��C_ Q PQM- 0,�� ��� �G�C 4 �,Q� O��`,t► COUNTY OF BUTTE OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE-----"-",--,--- 040260086000 WALTERS ALYS R TRUSTEE 9212 LOTT RD DURHAM CA 95938 00 U.S. POSTACt WALT212 959383273 1101 23 08/27/01 RETURN TO SENDER WALTERS 9116 LOTT RD DURHAM CA 9S938-9760 Au-:.� s3a.. ;._ �g li,i,„I�1,1,1,,,11,,,1,I„!I„I ifi111}11141fillI fill? 1111,1,filil„1<<,11,ifi1 N m COUNTY OF BUTTE t C o v icm OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE o� IV& 20 i OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED PUBLIC �s ' -- 066400019000 WICHMAN RICHARD A &BETTY D 13709 SKYWAY O 1/ HEARING _ _ .kMpGA1,IACA- 95954 ^.,._..� W1l:Fi/VY y5Y7YcfcES� 11V1 14 Vtl/cf//V1 � RETURN TO SENDER NOTICE WICF-IMAN' BETTY D 14842 MASTERSON WAY MAGALIA CA 95954-9668 • F j:1 � tEW Y. 1 tH Lit t � ta> � :4 C �' •'S 4 + � Y: 4" ' Al$9E�.�9S# � =.,s ; li�i,��l,l,i 1�,�11�,;1�l��IIE�I=` fll;:r�f�f,E►1�,�fi;),i�l,��fil�i,i�;l�!„1` °. ",t ~ x ' � f 1 f t- .�.�}�`'.,y` r� �• 1 -.* � 1h 1 +� t e'c: 'rf E�'i:e . • t COUNTY OF BUTTE OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • ,OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE r 066400017000 CA* IBARRA IZZIE `` AdE-lj1i. 13721 OLD SIC MAGALIA CA 959 KBID%A ^��. _ Vii► �S_ . . �� IJ1„1It. ifIIII,I1L11jillifl„1.11111lilt 1i1.1 F7-, p no 24`0 1 y I.„ WCA a C. a w, 066400017000 CA* IBARRA IZZIE `` AdE-lj1i. 13721 OLD SIC MAGALIA CA 959 KBID%A ^��. _ Vii► �S_ . . �� IJ1„1It. ifIIII,I1L11jillifl„1.11111lilt 1i1.1 COUNTY OF BUTTE OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE.;,;; OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-339'1-' RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED) ."'t 9 PUBLIC HEARING a NOTICE, r- c 0 �I `066400024000 THOMPSON SYLVIA 110 TOM POLK CHICO CA 95973 po ti 1 -to I pagefi 4600 U.f, aQaTaa� j� MP 95973 t- � �5�6s�3 � 4' {L�IIIill111111,„1{„ail{t�,I{fIf{I1«1{,`r COUNTY OF BUTTE OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED PUBLIC � HEARING N, 7 NOTICE.,, 066410002000 LEACH JOHN H & BARBARA -A, P O BOX 1050 PARADISE CA 95967 Al I.E. POSTA09 r LEACOSO 959672220 1600 17 06/29/01 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND LEACH PMB 848 3818 5 WESTERN AVE .S.LO.UX_ F -A L L.S, SD --5-7105 = 651.1 IiI ilii �i ;1 ii i].a i; i •i V166 ��A � � 1 ®. IDS, 2,'0 9 p � 066410002000 LEACH JOHN H & BARBARA -A, P O BOX 1050 PARADISE CA 95967 Al I.E. POSTA09 r LEACOSO 959672220 1600 17 06/29/01 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND LEACH PMB 848 3818 5 WESTERN AVE .S.LO.UX_ F -A L L.S, SD --5-7105 = 651.1 IiI ilii �i ;1 ii i].a i; i •i I I 40' LEASE AREA �I F S33IA83S 1N3wdol3n3a 30 HOD3a1a 'SSIWWOa ONINNVId 1lnU3d'Wa`d___ *d'n 8ONIW 33Ndladn JIV483d 3Sn d3S 31da weld yuawdolanao Q3nOadd`d i It +. r. . KAESTNER ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS P.O. Box 1777 Empire, California 95319 2935 4th Street Ceres, California 95307 Office: (209) 538-8245 IFox: (209) 538-8241 Y AR v C-13523 Expires 31 JAN. 2003 AT&T AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 2729 Prospect Park Rancho Cordova, California 95670 Office: (916) 857-6423 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO AT&T WIRELESS AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION. BIDDING. REVIEW AND OR CONSTRUCTION OF A SPECIFIC PROJECT. THIS DOCUMENT AND OR TTS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF AT&T WIRELESS. REVISIONS DATE: DESCRIPTION: 3/23/i01 REV ANTENNAS 6Y w m � O Z w O F- U-) NLu r' V y a V Lu t4! 0) w Q 0 Q = II J 0 d Z o Q Cr. 0^Q wN Z�! o„� SITE PLAN ENLARGED ARE PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATION 01-110.261 REV CUP -1 Fo v E 82001 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION