HomeMy WebLinkAboutUP 02-102 L&4 --L (5-0- �- 44 fat -,-
moo/
r
r,
Interoffice Memorandum
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Phone: 538-6571 FAX: 538-7785 '
TO: CENTRAL COLLECTIONS
FROM: Cheryl Spoor, Administrative Services Assistant
Department of Development Services
SUBJECT: COLLECTION REQUEST — Robert J. Vannucci, Application UP 02-10
AP# 027-270-034
DATE: August 19, 2003
Please process Robert J. Vannucci for collection for the above application. Unpaid charges total
$1610.25.
Here is a summary of events:
12/1/01 Initial application & $700 deposit received.
5/28/02 NOD/NOE filing fee paid.
7/12/02 Use Permit issued and sent via Certified Mail.
8/28/02 , Billing invoice sent - $1576.00 due and payable.
11 %4/02 Billing invoice sent - $1610.25 due and payable.
6/25/03 Re -billed including publication fee and clerical fee; new total $1750.55
(see below).
6/30/03 FINAL amount due per Yvonne Christopher, Director, $1610.25
(Includes a write-off of the $129.05 publishing fee and clerical fee $11.25)
7/8/03 Deborah DeBrunner attempted to contact the Vannucci's. She left a phone
message that was not returned by the Vannuccis. (See e-mail of 7/8/03)
7/9/03 FINAL invoice revised & billed with total due of $1610.25 and notification,
"FINAL BILLING BEFORE COLLECTION PROCEEDINGS."
8/19/03 No payment and no response received to date. Send to Central Collections.
r
Butte County Departrnent ofDevelopment Services
Administration - AR
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
(530) 538-7601 Telephone
REVISED INVOICE
Use Permit File: UP 02=.10
Applicant: Robert J. Vannucci APN: 027-270=034
3011 Craig Avenue Date: July 9, 2003
Oroville, CA 95966
FINAL BILLING BEFORE COLLECTION
PROCEEDINGS
0 1 C E UP 02.10
Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice, the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program
There maybe additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program, and are not reflectec
on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed, yoc
will receive a FINAL INVOICE.
following charges have been applied to the processing of your application:
Professional Planner $' 1;664400:
Mapping 73;75:
Clerical 372:50
TOTAL CHARGES:
following payments have been applied to your application:
Deposit Disbursement:
Deposit Date: Decembec:18;2001 Environmental'Health:..: $185:00
Receipt: 20109 Land•Deve'lopment; $1.50.00
Total Payment 1 078;00 Fire<Protection. $43.00
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES -PLANNING DEPOSIT $:. 700`00
The costs thus far in processing your application have exceeded the deposited/paid amount by:
NOD/NOE Filing fee pd 5/28/02 Rec 20535 $25.00
IAn additional deposit is required to continue processing this application
TOTAL PLANNING FEES DUE $ 1,610.25
Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees; deposits; billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to
amount equal to 25% of the original deposit, no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore
balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit, or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event tf
applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application, the application will be denied.
checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address.
J you have any questions, please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
KAFISCAL ADMINSILLINGS & REFUNDSISENT BILLINGSWannucci Up 02-10 Revised 070203.xls
PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET
FILE #: UP 02-10 PROJECT TYPE: Use Permit
APPLICANT: Robert J. Vannucci
ADDRESS: 3011 Craig Avenue, Oroville, CA 95966
OWNER: same
ADDRESS:
REPRESENTATIVE:
ADDRESS:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit to allow for a private (non-commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone to house owners personal dogs.
PROPERTY ZONED: A-5 LOCATED: Craig Avenue, a private road off of Reservoir Road, a northerly extension of Ontario Road
AP#: 027-270-034 TOWN/AREA: Oroville
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LDR (Low Density Residential)
1. Application accepted: December 18, 2001 Amount: $ 1078.00 Receipt #: 20109
2. Comments sent to: Development Services Director, Public Works Director, Environmental Health, Assessor,
LAFCo, Animal Control, Agricultural Commission, California Department of Forestry
3. Comments received from:
4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked:
5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet:
6. Assigned To: M. A. Meleka
7. Environmental Determination:
State Clearinghouse No:
Subject to Fish & Game:
8. Staff Report: Project Video:
9. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No _
10
11
12
13
Categorical Exemption-CEQA#
ative Declaration
Mitigation Negative Declaration
Environmental Impact Report
Gen. Rule Ex. -CEQA # 15061.(bx3)
Other
Date Sent to SCH:
Publication Notice Written: 4&5� xo,1=2 Display Ad Prepared:
Notices Mailed:Number of Notices:
Tl� - -
Newspaper Publication Date:�-
Planning Commission Hearing(s):-
Action taken:
Special Conditions:
Commission Resolution No
14. Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s):
Action taken:
Board Resolution No.:
15. Type Use Permit/Send for signature:
16. N.O.E. / N.O.D. / APPENDIX G:
17. Send validated Use Permit:
18. Assessor's Memo:
19. Copy of Use Permit / Variance to Planning Technician:
Ordinance No:
Adopted:
Fish & Game Fees Paid: Yes No
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785
Lteroffice Memorandum
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Phone: 538-6571 FAX: 538-7785
TO: CENTRAL COLLECTIONS
s
FROM: Cheryl Spoor, Administrative Services Assistant
Department of Development Services
SUBJECT: COLLECTION REQUEST — Robert J. Vannucci, Application UP 02-10
AP# 027-270-034
DATE: August 19, 2003
Please process Robert J. Vannucci for collection for the above application. Unpaid charges total
$1610.25.
Here is a summary of events:
- 12/1/01 Initial application & $700 deposit received.
* 5/28/02 NOD/NOE filing fee paid.
-?�— 7/12/02 Use Permit issued and sent via Certified Mail.
8/28/02 Billing invoice sent - $1576.00 due and payable.
/+ 11/4/02 Billing invoice sent - $1610.25 due and payable.
6/25/03 Re -billed including. publication fee and clerical fee; new total $1750.55
(see below).
6/30/03 FINAL amount due per Yvonne Christopher, Director, $1610.25
(Includes a write-off of the $129.05 publishing fee and clerical fee $11.25)
+ 7/8/03 Deborah DeBrunner attempted to contact the Vannucci's. She left a phone
message that was not returned by the Vannuccis. (See e-mail of 7/8/03)
7/9/03 FINAL invoice revised & billed with total due of $1610.25 and notification,
"FINAL BILLING BEFORE COLLECTION PROCEEDINGS."
8/19/03 No payment and no response received to date. Send to Central Collections.
W1 dhi-5
f'J ( 514 3 �r,-, &bU GQy65��
Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services
Administration - AR
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
(530) 538-7601 Telephone
Use Permit
Applicant: Robert J. Vannucci
3011 Craig Avenue
Oroville, CA 95966
REVISED INVOICE
File: UP 02-10
APN: 027-270-034
Date: July 9, 2003
FINAL BILLING BEFORE COLLECTION
PROCEEDINGS
UP 02.10
nning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice, the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing progl
.re may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program, and are not refle
this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed,
receive a FINAL INVOICE.
IThe following charges have been applied to the processing of your application:
Professional Planner $ 1,864.00
Mapping 73:75
Clerical 372.50'
TOTAL CHARGES:
IThe following payments have been applied to your application:
Deposit Disbursement:
Deposit Date: December 18, 2001 Environmental Health $185:00
Receipt: 20109 Land Development $150.00.
Total Payment $1,078.00 Fire Protection $43.00
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING DEPOSIT $ 700.00
The costs thus far in processing your application have exceeded the deposited/paid amount by: $ 1,610.25
NOD/NOE Filing fee pd 5/28/02 Rec 20535 $25.00
additional deposit is required to continue processing this application
TOTAL PLANNING FEES DUE
1,610.25
Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees; deposits; billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to a
amount equal to 25% of the original deposit, no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore
balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit, or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event tt
applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application, the, application will be denied.
checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address.
J you have any questions, please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
AMOUNT DUE AND. PAYABLE
cs July 23, 2003 1,610.25
KAFISCAL ADNI MBILLINGS 8 REFUNDS\SENT BILLINGSwannucci Up 02-10 Revised 070203.x1s
8
�` 8/19/2003 Butte County Department of De\elopment Services
10:25 AM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 1
Selection Criteria
Applicant (hand sel Include: Vannucci.UP 02-10
Nickname Vannucci.UP 02-10 Up 02-10
Full Name ROBERT VANNUCCI
Address 3011 CRAIG AVENUE
OROVILLE CA 95966
Phone 1 Phone 2
Phone 3 Phone 4
In Ref To
Fees Arrg. By billing value on each slip
Expense Arrg. By billing value on each slip
Tax Profile Exempt
Last bill 6/24/2003
Last charge 3/14/2003
Last payment 5/6/2002 Amount
$25.00
Date Employee
Rate
Hours
Amount
Total
ID Task
Markup %
DNB Time
DNB Amt
12/8/2001 Diane L.
34.00
3.00
102.00
Billable
37634 C
Clerical
12/8/2001 CBA-J.M. GERKEN
65.00
2.50
162.50
Billable
40501 P
Processing
12/8/2001 CBA -P. NELSON
90.00
1.50
135.00
Billable
40502 P
Processing
12/22/2001 Larry P.
59.00
1.25
73.75
Billable
37830 P
Processing
2/11/2002 CBA -R. CHAFIN
120.00
1.50
180.00
Billable
40503 P
Processing
2/11/2002 CBA-J.M. GERKEN
65.00
20.00
1,300.00
Billable
40504 P
Processing
2/11/2002 CBA -J. LOVETT
55.00
0.50
27.50
Billable
40505 P
Processing
L
1. ..
8/19/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
10:26 AM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 2
Vannucci.UP 02-10: ROBERT VANNUCCI (continued)
Date Employee
Rate
Hours
Amount
Total
ID Task
Markup %
DNB Time
DNB Amt
3/30/2002 Lynn R.
45.00
0.50
22.50
Billable
38990 C
Clerical
3/30/2002 Craig S.
59.00
1.00
59.00
Billable
39303 P
Processing
REPORT
4/13/2002 Lynn R.
45.00
1.00
45.00
Billable
39125 P
Processing
4/27/2002 Lynn R.
45.00
3.00
135.00
Billable
39638,C
Clerical
7/6/2002 Diane L.
34.00
1.00
34.00
Billable
40375 C
Clerical
PERMIT/NOD
8/28/2002 Diane L.
34.00
0.50
17.00
Billable
41432 C
Clerical
BILLING
11/4/2002 Diane L.
34.00
0.50
17.00
Billable
41433 C
Clerical
2ND BILLING
3/14/2003 Cheryl S.
45.00
0.25
11.25
Do Not Bill
42666 Administrative
0.25
11.25
Billing/administrative tasks not related to actual processing of application
TOTAL Billable Fees
37.75
$2,310.25
Do Not Bill
0.25
$11.25
Date Employee
Price
Quantity
Amount
Total
ID Expense
Markup %
5/6/2002 Lynn R.
129.05
1.000
129.05
Do Not Bill
41999 $C
129.05
Publish Legal Notice in Chico Enterprise Record
• i
8/19/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
10:26 AM Pre -bill Worksheet
Vannucci.UP 02-10: ROBERT VANNUCCI (continued)
TOTAL Billable Costs
Do Not Bill
Page 3
Amount Total
$0.00
$129.05
Calculation of Fees and Costs
Amount
Total
Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips
By billing value on each slip.
Total of billable time slips
$2,310.25
Total of Fees (Time Charges)
$2,310.25
Costs Bill Arrangement: Slips
By billing value on each slip.
Total of billable expense slips
$0.00
Total of Costs (Expense Charges)
$0.00
Total new charges
$2,310.25
Accounts Receivables
DatelID Type Description
12/18/2001 CRED Deposit - Receipt #20109
($700.00)
1827
5/6/2002 INV Invoice-NOD/NOE Filing Fee due
$25.00
2447
5/6/2002 PAY Payment-NOD/NOE Filing Fee Receipt 20535, ATR 44373. Check
($25.00)
2448 No. 3427
Total Accounts Receivable
($700.00)
New Balance
Current
$2,310.25
Unapplied
($700.00)
Total New Balance
$1,610.25
Page 1 of 1
Spoor, Cheryl
From: Spoor, Cheryl
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 3:11 PM
To: DeBrunner, Deborah
Subject: RE: Status of Vannucci
Thank you, will do.
Cheryl
-----Original Message -----
From: DeBrunner, Deborah
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:32'PM
To: Spoor, Cheryl
Subject: RE: Status of Vannucci
I did call and leave a message; he has not returned my call. Send the invoice with notice about
collections.
['�P,Uava.Y►� 17e��i ruNwt,�,v
Principal Analyst
Department of Development Services
7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965
(530) 538-7464 538-7785 Fax
-----Original Message -----
From: Spoor, Cheryl
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:13 PM
To: DeBrunner, Deborah
Subject: Status of Vannucci
Deborah,
Have you been in touch with Vannucci (UP 02-10)? Should I continue to wait on sending the
invoice?
Cheryl
8/19/2003
Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services
Administration - AR
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
(530) 538-7601 Telephone
REVISED INVOICE s
Use Permit
Applicant: Robert J. Vannucci
3011 Craig Avenue
Oroville, CA 95966
File: UP 02-10 Yy V
APN: 027-270-034
Date: July 2, 2003 C
I INVOICE UP 02.10
Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice, the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing progl
There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program, and are not refle
on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed,
will receive a FINAL INVOICE.
IThe following charges have been applied to the processing of your application:
Professional Planner $ 1,864.00
Mapping 73.75
Clerical 372.50
TOTAL CHARGES: $ 2.310.25
IThe following payments have been applied to your application:
Deposit Disbursement:
Deposit Date: December 18, 2001 Environmental Health $185.00
Receipt: 20109 Land Development $150.00
Total Payment $1,078.00 Fire Protection $43.00
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING DEPOSIT $ 700.00
The costs thus far in processing your application have exceeded the deposited/paid amount by: $ 1,610.25
NOD/NOE Filing fee pd 5/28/02 Rec 20535 $25.00
additional deposit is required to continue processing this application
TOTAL PLANNING FEES DUE $ 1,610.25
Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees; deposits; billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to,
amount equal to 25% of the original deposit, no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore
balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit, or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event tt
applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application, the application will be denied.
Make checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address.
Should you have any questions, please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE 1,610.25
Biller. CS July 11, 2003,.
K:\FISCAL ADMIN\BILLINGS & REFUNDS\SENT BILLINGSWannucci Up 02-10 Revised 070203.xis
7/1/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
4:16 PM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 1
Selection Criteria
Applicant (handsel Include: UP 02-10
Nickname
UP 02-10 11784
Amount
Full Name
ROBERT VANNUCCI
DNB Time
Address
3011 CRAIG AVENUE
34.00
3.00
OROVILLE CA 95966
Billable
Phone 1
2.50
Phone 2
Phone 3
90.00
Phone 4
In Ref To
Billable
Fees Arrg.
By billing value on each
slip
Expense Arrg.
By billing value on each
slip
Tax Profile
Last bill
Exempt
6/24/2003
� b ffio e
Last charge
3/14/2003
65.00
Last payment
5/6/2002
Amount $25.00
Date Employee
ID Task
12/8/2001 Diane L.
37634 C
Clerical
12/8/2001 CBA-J.M. GERKEN
40501 P
Processing
12/8/2001 CBA -P. NELSON
40502 P
Processing
12/22/2001 Larry P.
37830 P
Processing
2/11/2002 CBA -R. CHAFIN
40503 P
Processing
2/11/2002 CBA-J.M. GERKEN
40504 P
Processing
2/11/2002 CBA -J. LOVETT
40505 P
Processing
A l
c37,-2
Rate
Hours
Amount
Total
Markup %
DNB Time
DNB Amt
34.00
3.00
;102.00
Billable
65.00
2.50
X162:50
Billable
90.00
1.50Q35`00
Billable
59.00
1.25
73.75
Billable
120.00
1.50
X180100
Billable
65.00
20.00
-_1;300:00—
Billable
55.00
0.50
X27:50"
Billable
IF
7/1/2003
4:16 PM
•
Butte County Department of Development Services
Pre -bill Worksheet
UP 02-10:ROBERT VANN000I (continued)
Page 2
Date Employee
Rate
Hours
Amount
Total
ID Task
Markup %
DNB Time
DNB Amt
3/30/2002 Lynn R.
45.00
0.50
22.50*
Billable
38990 C
Clerical
3/30/2002 Craig S.
59.00
1.00
X59:-00,
Billable
39303 P
Processing
REPORT
4/13/2002 Lynn R.
45.00
1.00
45:00,
Billable
39125 P
Processing
4/27/2002 Lynn R.
45.00
3.00
X135,00
Billable
39638 C
Clerical
7/6/2002 Diane L.
34.00
1.00
-34.00 `
Billable
40375 C
Clerical
PERMIT/NOD
8/28/2002 Diane L.
34.00
0.50
.-17.00
Billable
41432 C
Clerical
B ILLING
11/4/2002 Diane L.
34.00
0.50
17.00
Billable
41433 C
Clerical
2ND BILLING
3/14/2003 Cheryl S.
45.00
0.25
11.25
Do Not Bill
42666 Administrative
0.25
11.25
Billing/administrative tasks not
related to actual processing of application
TOTAL Billable Fees
37.75
$2,310.25
Do Not Bill
0.25
$11.25
Date Employee
Price
Quantity
Amount
Total
ID Expense
Markup %
5/6/2002 Lynn R.
129.05
1.000
129.05
Do Not Bill
41999 $C
129.05
Publish Legal Notice in Chico Enterprise Record
7/1/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
4:16 PM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 3
UP 02-10:ROBERT VANN000I (continued)
Amount Total
TOTAL Billable Costs $0.00
Do Not Bill $129.05
Calculation of Fees and Costs
Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips
By billing value on each slip.
Total of billable time slips
Total of Fees (Time Charges)
Costs Bill Arrangement: Slips
By billing value on each slip.
Total of billable expense slips
Total of Costs (Expense Charges)
Total new charges
Accounts Receivables
DatelID Type Description
12/18/2001 CRED Deposit - Receipt #20109
1827
5/6/2002 INV Invoice-NOD/NOE Filing Fee due
2447
5/6/2002 PAY Payment-NOD/NOE Filing Fee Receipt 20535, ATR 44373. Check
2448 No. 3427
Total Accounts Receivable
New Balance
Current
Unapplied
Total New Balance
Amount Total
$2,310.25
$2,310.25
$0.00
$0.00
($700.00)
$25.00
($25.00)
$2,310.25
($700.00)
$2,310.25
($700.00)
$1,610.25
COUNTY OF BUTTE. • FIELD NUMBER v
OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA PURCHASE ORDER F 264754
S
U Chi'co Eti-te-r-rise 'Record
P 11
P At th., -.Don.ria Issued By
Department a), 3-1
:E
Pl�i 12
L P.O. P�ox 9
I Clhico, CA 9.519 7
E
R
DATE
F
QNTY
INVOICE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CHARGE TO
W. O.
3/20/02
AMOUNT
C-'
�95�'
480-001-W-1
2
T -o be rublis-hedl izi the Oroville
1.
3
:"erciiry on FridaV, April 5, 2002
4
5
Please fur-nisht tlizs: office ti --yo ce7)jeA
6
of-,,)ub1ic;-:,ti.on.
(Varinucci10)
813,nui -.538-7602
Butte co-usity planni-ng
7 Coxintv Center Drive
Orovilla,-IZA 95965
OT: OA!
I e
TOTAL I / '-py lo
d WIN
1, the. undersigned, herebTrcertify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above have been
performed,or delivered or, where authorized, are hereby contracted for and that there is a Budget Appropriation for the same.
F26
Dated: k"
Department Head or Authorized Deputy
SUPPLIER NO.
'Submit WHITE, CANARY''a: nj '. 'PINK to PURCHASING SERVICES with supplier's invoice. Retain GOLDENROD.
DEPT.
ACCOUNT NO.
PROJECT NO.
INVOICE NO.
INV. DATE
ENCUMBRANCE
AMOUNT
2
3
4
5
6
'Submit WHITE, CANARY''a: nj '. 'PINK to PURCHASING SERVICES with supplier's invoice. Retain GOLDENROD.
r
6/30/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
4:04 PM Pre -bill Worksheet
Selection Criteria
Applicant (handsel Include: UP 02-10
Nickname
UP 02-10 1 1784
Full Name
ROBERT VANNUCCI
Address
3011 CRAIG AVENUE
65.00
OROVILLE CA 95966
Phone 1
Phone 2
Phone 3
Phone 4
In Ref To
Fees Arrg.
By billing value on each slip
Expense Arrg.
By billing value on each slip
Tax Profile
Exempt
Last bill
6/24/2003
Last charge
3/14/2003
Last payment
5/6/2002 Amount $25.00
Date Employee
ID Task
12/8/2001 Diane L.
37634 C
Clerical
12/8/2001 CBA-J.M. GERKEN
40501 P
Processing
12/8/2001 CBA -P. NELSON
40502 P
Processing
12/22/2001 Larry P.
37830 P
Processing
2/11/2002 CBA -R. CHAFIN
40503 P
Processing
2/11/2002 CBA-J.M. GERKEN
40504 P
Processing
2/11/2002 CBA -J. LOVETT
40505 P
Processing
"
7;L
P�..1,c�72 D qG l�c:eA�
Rate
Hours
Markup %
DNB Time
34.00
3.00
65.00
2.50
Page 1
Amount Total
DNB Amt
102.00 Billable
162.50 Billable
90.00
1.50
135.00
59.00
1.25
73.75
120.00
1.50
180.00
65.00
20.00
1,300.00
55.00 0.50
.-Pb p- �I �
27.50
Billable
Billable
Billable
Billable
Billable
6/30/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
4:04 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 2
UP 02-10:ROBERT VANNUCCI (continued)
Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total
ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt
3/30/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 0.50" 22.50 Billable
38990 C
Clerical
3/30/2002 Craig S. 59.00 1.00 59.00 Billable
39303 P
Processing
REPORT
4/13/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable
39125 P
Processing
4/27/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 3.00 135.00 Billable
39638 C
Clerical
7/6/2002 Diane L. 34.00 1.00 34.00 Billable
40375 C
Clerical
PERMIT/NOD
8/28/2002 Diane L. 34.00 0.50 17.00 Billable
41432 C
Clerical
BILLING
11/4/2002 Diane L. 34.00 0.50 17.00 Billable
41433 C
Clerical
2ND BILLING
3/14/2003 Cheryl S. 45.00 0.25 11.25 Billable
42666 Administrative
Billing/administrative tasks not related to actual processing of application
TOTAL Billable Fees . 38.00 $2,321.50
Date Employee Price Quantity Amo u t Total
ID Expense Markup % _
5/6/2002 Lynn R. 129.05 1.000 129.05 Billable
41999 $C
Publish Legal Notice in Chico Enterprise Record
6/30/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
4:04 PM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 3
UP 02-10:ROBERT VANNUCCI (continued)
Amount Total
TOTAL Billable Costs $129.05
Calculation of Fees and Costs
Amount Total
Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips
By billing value on each slip.
Total of billable time slips $2,321.50
Total of Fees (Time Charges) $2,321.50
Costs Bill Arrangement: Slips
By billing value on each slip.
Total of billable expense slips $129.05
Total of Costs (Expense Charges) $129.05
Total new charges $2,450.55
Accounts Receivables
DatelID Type Description
12/18/2001 CRED Deposit - Receipt #20109 ($700.00)
1827
5/6/2002 INV Invoice-NOD/NOE Filing Fee due $25.00
2447
5/6/2002 PAY Payment-NOD/NOE Filing Fee Receipt 20535, ATR 44373. Check ($25.00)
2448 No. 3427
Total Accounts Receivable ($700.00)
New Balance
Current $2,450.55
Unapplied ($700.00)
Total New Balance $1,750.55
6/27/2003
3:32 PM
Butte County Department of Development Services
Pre -bill Worksheet / P�Ae 1
Selection Criteria
Applicant (hand sel Include: UP 02-10
Nickname
UP 02-10 11784
Full Name
ROBERT VANNUCCI
Address
3011 CRAIG AVENUE
DNB Amt
OROVILLE CA 95966
Phone 1
Phone 2
Phone 3
Phone 4
In Ref To
2.50
Fees Arrg.
By billing value on each slip
Expense Arrg.
By billing value on each slip
Tax Profile
Exempt
Last bill
6/24/2003
Last charge
3/14/2003
Last payment
5/6/2002 Amount $25.00
Date Employee
ID Task
12/8/2001 Diane L.
37634 C
Clerical
12/8/2001 CBA-J.M. GERKEN
40501 P
Processing
12/8/2001 CBA -P. NELSON
40502 P
Processing
12/22/2001 Larry P.
37830 P
Processing
2/11/2002 CBA -R. 'CHAFIN
40503 P
Processing
2%11/2002 CBA-J.M. GERKEN
40504 P
Processing
2/11/2002 CBA -J. LOV/
40505 P
Rate
Hours
Amount
Total
Markup %
DNB Time
DNB Amt
34.00
3.00
102.00
Billable
65.00
2.50
�_1_62"50
Billable
90.00
1.50
135.00_:
Billable
59.00
1.25
73.75
Billable
120.00
1.50
rl80.00
Billable
65.00
20..00
',-1,360-00' i
Billable
55.00
0.50
7_27'50
Billable
0
s
Y�
6/27/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
3:32 PM Pre -bill Worksheet
UP 02-10:ROBERTVANNUCCI (continued)
Date Employee Rate Hours Amount
ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt _
3/30/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 0.50 22.50
38990 C
Clerical
3/30/2002 Craig S. 59.00 1.00 59.00
39303 P
Processing
REPORT
4/13/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00
39125 P
Processing
4/27/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 3.00 135.00
39638 C
Clerical
7/6/2002 Diane L. 34.00 1.00 34.00
40375 C
Clerical
PERMIT/NOD
8/28/2002 Diane L. 34.00 0.50 17.00
41432 C
Clerical
BILLING
11/4/2002 Diane L. 34.00 0.50 17.00
41433 C
Clerical
2ND BILLING
3/14/2003 Cheryl S. 45.00 0.25 1a�25
42666 Administrative
Billing/administrative tasks not related to actual processing of application
Page 2
Total
Billable
Billable
Billable
Billable
Billable
Billable
Billable
Bi lab
TOTAL Billable Fees 38.00 $2321 50
Date Employee Price Quantity Amount Total
ID Expense Markup %
5/6/2002 Lynn R. 129.05 1.000 129.05 Billable
41999 $C
Publish Legal Notice in Chico Enterprise Record
6/27/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
3:32 PM Pre -bill Worksheet
UP 02-10:ROBERT VANN00OI (continued)
TOTAL Billable Costs
Calculation of Fees and Costs
Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips
By billing value on each slip.
Total of billable time slips
Total of Fees (Time Charges)
Costs Bill Arrangement: Slips
By billing value on each slip.
Total of billable expense slips
Total of Costs (Expense Charges)
Total new charges
Accounts Receivables
DatelID Type Description
12/18/2001 CRED Deposit - Receipt #20109
1827
5/6/2002 INV Invoice-NOD/NOE Filing Fee due
2447
5/6/2002 PAY Payment-NOD/NOE Filing Fee Receipt 20535, ATR 44373. Check
2448 No. 3427
Total Accounts Receivable
New Balance
Current
Unapplied
Total New Balance
Page 3
Amount Total
$129.05
Amount Total
$2,321.50
$2,321.50
$129.05
$129.05
($700.00)
$25.00
($25.00)
$2,450.55
($700.00)
$2,450.55
($700.00)
y 1, / JV.:JJ
A) �, t, I
9R49je Z-�>
4
/go.S
Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services
Administration - AR
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
(530) 538.7601 Telephone
Use Permit
Applicant: Robert J. Vannucci
3011 Craig Avenue
Oroville, CA 95966
File: UP 02-10
APN:027-270-034
Date: June 25, 2003
UP 02-10
nning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice, the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program.
:re maybe additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program, and are not reflected
this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed, you
receive a FINAL INVOICE.
following charges have been applied to the processing of your application:
Professional Planner $ 1,864.00
Mapping 73.75
Clerical 383.75
Publishing 129.05
TOTAL CHARGES: $ 2.450.55
following payments have been applied to your application:
Deposit Disbursement:
Deposit Date: December 18, 2001 Environmental Health $185.00
Receipt: 20109 Land Development $150.00
Total Payment $1,078.00 Fire Protection $43.00
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING DEPOSIT $ 700.00
The costs thus far In processing your application have exceeded the deposited/paid amount by: $ 1,750.55
NOD/NOE Filing fee pd 5/28/02 Rec 20535 $25.00
additional deposit Is required to continue processing this application
TOTAL PLANNING FEES DUE $ 1,750.55
Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees; deposits; billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to,
amount equal to 25% of the original deposit, no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore
balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit, or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event 0
applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application, the application will be denied.
checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address.
J you have any questions, please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m, to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE
July 9, 2003 1,750.55
K:TISCAL ADMIMBILLINGS & REFUNDS\SENT BILLINGSWannucci Up 02-10 062503.xis
4
Date 12/09/02 Development Services Department
Time 2:45 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet
UP 02-10 ROBERT VANNUCCI
3011 CRAIG AVENUE
OROVILLE, CA 95966
Rounding : None
Full Precision : No
Last bill
Last charge 11/04/02
Last payment / / Amount
Date/Slip# Description
12/08/01
Diane L. / C
438370
Clerical
34.00
12/08/01
CBA-J.M. GERKEN
/ P
#41247
Processing
1.50
12/08/01
CBA -P. NELSON /
P
#41248
Processing
59.00
12/22/01
Larry P. / P
180.00
#38566
Processing
20.00
02/11/02
CBA -R. CHAFIN /
P
#41249
Processing
55.00
02/11/02
CBA-J.M. GERKEN
/ P
#41250
Processing
1.00
02/11/02
CBA -J. LOVETT /
P
#41251
Processing
03/30/02
Lynn R. / C
#39732
Clerical
03/30/02
Craig S. / P
#40046
Processing
REPORT
04/13/02
Lynn R. / P
#39868
Processing
04/27/02
Lynn R. / C
#40384
Clerical
: $0.00
Page 1
HOURS/RATE
AMOUNT TOTAL
3.00
102.00
34.00
2.50
162.50
65.00
1.50
135.00
90.00
1.25
73.75
59.00
1.50
180.00
120.00
20.00
1,300.00
65.00
0.50
.27.50
55.00
0.50
22.50
45.00
1.00
59.00
59.00
1.00 45.00
45.00
3.00 135.00
45.00
i
Date 12/09/02
Time 2:45 pm
UP 02-10
Development Services Department
Applicant Billing Worksheet
:ROBERT VANNUCCI (continued)
Date/Slip# Description
07/06/02 Diane L. / C
#41121 Clerical
PERMIT/NOD
08/28/02 Diane L. / C
#42183 Clerical
BILLING
11/04/02 Diane L. / C
#42184 Clerical
2ND BILLING
HOURS/RATE
1.00
34.00
0.50
34.00
0.50
34.00
TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES 37.75
Page 2
AMOUNT TOTAL
34.00
17.00
17.00
$2,310.25
TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS $0.00
TOTAL NEW CHARGES $2,310.25
PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS
12/18/01 Deposit - Receipt #20109 (700.00)
TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS ($700.00)
NEW BALANCE
New Current period 1,610.25
TOTAL NEW BALANCE
$1,610.25
N
November 4; 2002
Robert Vannucci
3.011 Craig Avenue
Oroville, CA 95966
RE: Use Permit, File No. #UP 02-10
APN# 027-270-034
Dear Mr. Vannucci:
LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
DIRECTOR'S OFFICE
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530)538-7785
www.buffer,ounty.net
A letter dated August 28, 2002, was mailed to you requesting that you remit a check payable to the
Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $1,576.00, because the costs to process your above -
referenced application exceeded your deposit of $700.00 by $1,576.00. We have not yet received
payment. There are now additional clerical charges toward the billing of your project. Please make a
check payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $1,610.25 and remit it to the Planning
Division at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California 95965
Should you have any questions, please contact me at 538-6869 Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m.
Sincerely,
Diane Lewellen
Office Assistant III
Attachment
UP 01-22.Itr
1
August 28, 2002
Robert Vannucci
3011 Craig Avenue
Oroville, CA 95966
RE: Use Permit, File No. UP 02-10
APN# 027-270-034
Dear Mr. Vannucci:
�� utte
Count
_t
ip LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
DIRECTOR'S OFFICE
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530)538-7785
www.buttecounty."6et
The total cost for the processing of the above -referenced application which was approved by the Planning
Commission on April 25, 2002, is $2,276.25. On December 18, 2001, a deposit was made in the amount
of $1,078.00, of which $185.00 was disbursed to Environmental Health Division, $150.00 to Land
Development Division, $43.00 to CDF/Fite Department. The amount received on account to Planning
Division was $700.00. The cost exceeded the Planning Division deposit by $1,576.00. Below is a
breakdown:
Professional Planner' $1,864.00
Mapping $ 73.75
Clerical $ 338.50
Total $2,276.25
Deposit on 12/18/01, Receipt #20109 $ 700.00
Total Amount Over Deposits $1,576.00
Total Amount Due and Payable $1,576,00
Please make a check payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $1,576.00 and remit it to the
Department of Development Services, Planning Division at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965
within 30 calendar days (September 27, 2002). Should you have any questions, please contact this office
Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at 538-7601.
Sincerely,
Diane Lewellen
Office Assistant III
J:\First Billing Letter.doc
Date 11/05/02
Time 3:30 pm
UP 02-10
r
Development Services Departmo'
Applicant Billing Word et
ROBERT VANNUCCI
3011 CRAIG AVENUE
OROVILLE, CA 95966
Rounding : None
Full Precision : No
Last bill
Last charge 11/04/02.
Last payment / / Amount
Date/Slip# Description
12/08/01 Diane L. / C
#38370 Clerical
:210'8/01 CBA-J.M. GERKEN / P
#4"1247 Processing -
12%08/01 CBA -P. NELSON_ �/ P
#41248 Processing
12/22/01 Larry P. / P
#38566 Processing
02711/02 CBA-R..CHAFIN/ P
#4'1249 Processing
02/11/02 CBA-J.M..GERK_EN / P
#41250 Processing
02/11/02 CBA -J. LOVETT /_P'0
#41251 Processing
03/30/02 Lynn R. / C
#39732 Clerical
03/30/02 Craig S. / P
#40046 Processing
REPORT
04/13/02 Lynn R. / P
#39868 Processing
04/27/02 Lynn R. / C
#40384 Clerical
ME�
Page 30
HOURS/RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
3.00
102.00
34.00
W
�v
X2:'50
162.50,
r,_65 *00
1.50
135.00��
1-_90.00r
1.25
73.75
59.00
-1'80.00
_1.50
—120.00 --
�..-
20.00
1,.300..001,/
65.00
0.50-
27_..50
55.00
-- —__'J
0.50
22.50
45.00
1.00 59.00
59.00
1.00 45.00
45.00
3.00 135.00
45.00
'Date 11/05/02
Time 3:30 pm
UP 02-10
Development Services Department
Applicant Billing Worksheet
:ROBERT VANNUCCI (continued)
Page 31
Date/Slip# Description
HOURS/RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
07/06/02 Diane L. / C
1.00
34.00
#41121 Clerical
34.00
PERMIT/NOD
08/28/02 Diane L. / C
0.50
17.00
#42183 Clerical
34.00
BILLING
11/04/02 Diane L. / C
0.50
17.00
#42184 Clerical
34.00
2ND BILLING
TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES
37.75
$2,310.25
TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS
$0.00
TOTAL NEW CHARGES
$2,310.25
PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS
12/18/01 Deposit - Receipt #20109
(700.00)
TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS
($700.00)
NEW BALANCE
New Current period
1,610.25
TOTAL NEW BALANCE
$1,610.25
COTTON/BRIDGES/ASSOCIATES
URBAN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING ralya
January 31, 2002
Project No: 01372.08
Butte County Development Sery Dept Invoice No: 0007856
Attn: Meleka.
7 County Center Dr
Oroville CA 95965
BUTTE COUNTY UP 02-10
Invoice for professional services rendered in preparation UP -02-10 per contract dated November 7, 2001 and
authorization by Meleka Meleka.
Professional services through January 31, 2002.
Professional Personnel
Hours Rate Amount
Professional
Gerken, J. Matthew 2.50 65.00 162.50
Nelson, Pamela 1.50 90.00 135.00
Totals 4.00 297.50
Total Labor 297.50
Total this invoice $297.50
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF INVOICE OR NOTE INVOICE AND PROJECT NUMBERS ON CHECK
MAIL ALL REMITTANCE CHECKS TO THE PASADENA ADDRESS
Note: Certain costs incurred during the stated time period (e.g., printing, telephone and subconsultant
charges) may not be included in this invoice and will be billed in a subsequent invoice.
7.37 EAST GREEN STREET SUITE 300 PASADENA, CA 91101-2119 (626) 30.1-0102 FAX (626) 304.0402 cba@cbaplanning.com
6336 GREENWICH DRIVE SUITE F SAN DIEGO, CA 92122.5922 • (858) 625.0056 FAX (858) 625.0545 • cbasd@cbaplanning.com
720 SUNRISE AVENUE SUITE 202-C ROSEVILLE, CA 95661.1509 (916) 780.9390 FAX (916) 780-9388 • cbasac@cbaplanniiig.com
COTTON/BRIDGES/ASSOCIATES
URBAN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
July 10, 2002
Invoice No: 48171372.0008-0000001
BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERV DEPT
ATTN: M.A. MELEKA
7 COUNTY CENTER DR
OROVILLE CA 95965
Project: 48171372.0008 BUTTE COUNTY UP 02-10
Invoice for professional services rendered in preparation UP 02-10 per contract dated November 7, 2001
and authorization by M. A. Meleka for client #048105828.
Professional Services: February 1. 2002 through June 28,
2002
Professional Personnel
Hours
Rate
Amount
Principal
CHAFIN, RANDY 1.50
120.00
180.00.
Professional
GERKEN, J. 20.00
65.00
1,300.00
Word Processing
LOVETT, JANICE 0.50
55.00
27.50
Totals 22.00
1,507.50
Total
1,507.50
Please mail all checks to our lockbox.
File #055777
Los Angeles, CA 90.074
0
Total this invoice $1,507.50
BUTTE COUNTY
September 24, 2002
Robert & Sylvia Vannucci
3011 Craig Avenue
Oroville, CA 95966
RE: Use Permit, File No. UP 02-10
APN# 027-270-034
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Vannucci:
A letter dated August 28, 2002, indicated that the above -referenced project was approved by the Planning
Commission on April 25, 2002. Inquiry has been made by Mrs. Vannucci, regarding payment of the bill through
the use of installments. The following is a payment schedule to be agreed upon. Please review, sign and return.
PAYMENT SCHEDULE:
The Total Amount Due & Payable is $10576.00. Robert & Sylvia Vannucci, will pay $300.00 on or before
November 1, 2002. A second payment in the amount of $425.00 will be paid on or before December 1, 2002. A
third payment in the amount of $425.00 will be paid on or before January 1, 2003. A fourth and final payment in the
amount of $426.00 will be paid on or before February 1, 2003.
Checks should be made payable to the Butte County Treasurer, and mailed to the Department of Development
Services, Planning Division, at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965. Should you have any questions, please
contact this office Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at 538-7601.
We agree to the terms of the payment schedule as set forth above.
Name
Name
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Diane Lewellen
Office Assistant III
JAPayment Plan Letter.doc
Date
Date
r
F
f p
Y l`
µ
August 28, 2002
Robert Vannucci
3011 Craig Avenue
Oroville, CA 95966
RE: Use Permit, File No. UP 02-10
APN# 027-270-034
Dear Mr. Vannucci:
161rmo Count
L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH A N D B E A U T Y
DIRECTOR'S OFFICE
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530)538-7785
www.buftecounty.net
The total cost for the processing of the above -referenced application which was approved by the Planning
Commission on April 25, 2002, is $2,276.25. On December 18, 2001, a deposit was made in the amount
of $1,078.00, of which $185.00 was disbursed to Environmental Health Division, $150.00 to Land
Development Division, $43.00 to CDF/Fire Department. The amount received on account to Planning
Division was $700.00. The cost exceeded the Planning Division deposit by $1,576.00. Below is a
breakdown:
Professional Planner $1,864.00
Mapping $ 73.75
Clerical $ 338.50
Total $2,276.25
Deposit on 12/18/01, Receipt #20109 $ 700.00
Total Amount Over Deposits $1,576.00
Total Amount Due and Payable $1,576.00
Please make a check payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $1,576.00 and remit it to the
Department of Development Services, Planning Division at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965
within 30 calendar days (September 27, 2002). Should you have any questions, please contact this office
Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at 538-7601.
Sincerely,
Diane Lewellen
Office Assistant III
1:\First Billing L-etter.doc
F
Date 08/28/02
Time 8:59 am
UP 02-10
Ovelopment Services Departiitent
Applicant Billing Worksheet
ROBERT VANNUCCI
3011 CRAIG AVENUE
OROVILLE, CA 95966 Uh Qa-/U
Rounding : None
Full Precision : No
Last bill
Last charge 07/19/02
Last payment / / Amount
Date/Slip# Description
12/08/01
Diane L. / C
#38370
Clerical
12/08/01
CBA-J.M. GERKEN
/ P
#41247
Processing
12/08/01
CBA -P. NELSON /
P
#41248
Processing
12/22/01
Larry P. / P
#38566
Processing
02/11/02
CBA -R. CHAFIN /
P
#41249
Processing
02/11/02
CBA-J.M. GERKEN
/ P
441250
Processing
02/11/02
CBA -J. LOVETT /
P
#41251
Processing
03/30/02
Lynn R. / C
#39732
Clerical
03/30/02
Craig S. / P
#40046
Processing
REPORT
04/13/02
Lynn R. / P
#39868
Processing
04/27/02
Lynn R. / C
#40384
Clerical
p�ccmn 1�6y. 0o
c,C LLC -j
$0.00 -
HOURS/RATE
3.00
34.00
2.50
65.00
1.50
90.00
1.25
59.00
1.50
120.00
20.00
65.00
0.50
55.00
0.50
45.00
1.00
59.00
1.00
45.00
3.00
45.00
Page 1
AMOUNT TOTAL
102.00
162.50
135.00
73.75
180.00
1,300.00
27.50
22.50
59.00
45.00
135.00
Date 08/28/02 40e velopment Services Departgnt
Time 8:59 am Applicant Billing Worksheet
UP 02-10 :ROBERT VANNUCCI (continued)
Page 2
Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TOTAL
07/06/02 Diane L. / C 1.00 34.00
#41121 Clerical 34.00
PERMIT/NOD
TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES 36.75 $2,276.25
TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS $0.00
TOTAL NEW CHARGES $2,276.25
PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS
12/18/01 Deposit - Receipt #20109 (700.00)
TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS ($700.00)
NEW BALANCE
New Current period 1,576.25
TOTAL NEW BALANCE $1,576.25
COUNTY OF BUTTE
AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT
OROVILLE, CA
RECEIVED FROM PLANNING
BAG # 316
FUND
DESCRIPTION TITLE
FUND
CODE
DEPT
CODE
ACCT
CODE
ATR No
DATE
CASH
CODE
44373
5/2812002
AMOUNT
DEPOSIT DATE: 528
RECEIPTS: 20528-20550
PLANNING APPL FEES GENL
0010
480001
4210900
101001
3,339.05
DOCUMENT/COPY SALES GENL
0010
480001
4711910
101001
51.70
NODlNOE CLERK'S FILING FE GENL
0010
470001
4612319
101001
25.00
($25) Project Number
Amount of Fee
UP 02-10-R Vannucci #027-270-034
$25
ENVIRONMENTAL HLTH GENL
0010
540003
4614901
101001
92.00
Project Number
Amount of Fee
MUP 02-20 C McKenzie #007-072-014
$92
FIRE PLNG APPL FEE FIRE PROTECT
0100
4617240
101001
43.00
Project Number
Amount of Fee
MUP 02-20 C McKenzie #007-072-014
$43
-
TOTAL $
3,550.75
APPROVED BY:
AUDITOR -CONTROLLER
RECEIVED BY:
TREASURER
By:
white --treasurer pink --auditor canaryr—deposit.or golden rod=file
'a.
CAI
s��o5
ate,,
�'
r
�1
DATE
RECEIPT
NO.
TOTAL
RECEIVED
PUBLIC'
WORKS
LAFCO1
PLANNING
PUBLIC
SALES
ENV.
HEALTH
FIRE
NOE/NOD
F/G FEE
OTHER
- APPLICANT -
RECEIVED FROM r-,+
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
!-
RECEIPT 205-35
ISSUED BY
f
�N
2
J
O
-lds'
i
�.
,
o2V5.35
1�5
o��
d _
RECEIPT
TOTAL
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
ENV.
NOE/NOD
DATE
NO.
RECEIVED
WORKS
LAFCO
PLANNING
SALES
HEALTH
FIRE
F/G FEE
OTHER
APPLICANT
RECEIVED FROM
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT ^ t
.20535 'f
Us4, //�6'�^�/'>�
Avo-
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT 20109 O109
ISSUED BY
I*
•
Robert Vannucci, proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding
environmental impacts and Use Permit to allow a private dog kennel on property with one
single-family dwelling and accessory structures. The Use Permit would allow the boarding of
Vannucci's personal dogs. A maximum of 12 dogs is anticipated, according to the project
applicant. The dogs would be kept in a proposed kennel building and surrounding fenced area.
An additional septic system on-site is proposed to handle waste from the dogs. Sanitary sewer
service for the house on-site is, and would continue to be, provided by a septic tank. Water
is, and would continue to be, obtained from wells on the site. Construction of the kennel
building, notwithstanding provisions of this Initial Study, will require a Building Permit, and
the applicant will be required to comply with any conditions associated with the Building
Permit process. The applicant would be required to obtain a sewage disposal permit for the
additions to the septic system from the Environmental Health Department. The property is
zoned A-5 (Agricultural, 5 -acre parcels) and is located at 3011 Craig Avenue (Craig Avenue
is a private road accessible via Palermo Honcut), Oroville area. APN# 027-270-034 (RC)
(UP 02-10)
Mathew Gerken gave a brief summary of the project. He submitted a suggested change to Condition
7.
Commissioner Nelson asked about a condition for bark collars when necessary.
Wendy Castillo, Animal Control, said that there are approximately 30 dogs on the property at this
time and she would like to see the cap down to a maximum of 8 dogs. She alsosaid that there is a
current problem with sanitation. She informed the Commission that the kennel license should be
secured within 30 days. She requested that condition 14 be changed to limit the kennel to 8 dogs.
In addition, she said that Mr. Vannucci can always come back and ask for the number to be raised
to 12. She noted that dogs over 4 months of age are counted as adult dogs. She conculuded
requesting that Animal Control be allowed to conduct inspections quarterly for the first year and
annually thereafter and to make this a new Condition 16.
Chairman Mooney asked about who should pay for a noise study if needed. He requested specific
wording in the condition, when the -County -requires -a- noise -study -that -the study_be.paid by -the
applicant
Mr. Leland said that he would like to know the standard noise level at a property line.
Mr. Meleka said that the standard is up to 65 dBA at the property line.
The hearing was opened to the public.
Robert Vannucci agreed with all conditions set by Animal Control and the other County
departments. He added that the odor will be controlled. He said that he would like to keep 12 dogs
because they are older dogs. He stated that there will be no more puppies and the dogs would be
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 MINUTES ■ APRIL 25, 2002 ■ PAGE 7 0
kept inside at night. He assured the Commission that he would keep the property clean and that the
kennel would be fenced.
Ms. Castillo assured Mr. Vannucci that she did not want to take any of his pets away. She said that
she would not have a problem with 12 on the condition that when the dogs pass away there is a cap
of 8 dogs from then on.
Ken Sewell had a problem with the large number of dogs. He said that placing the kennel north of
the creek would put the kennel 200 feet from his property. He said that he has been waiting for
action on this complaint and that the subject area is very quit.
Commissioner Nelson told Mr. Sewell that the concept is to keep the kennel as far from the
neighbors as possible.
Mr. Sewell was concerned with liability if the dogs get loose and whether Mr. Vannucci has to post
a bond. He discussed the issue of noise and the use of bark collars and the issue of odors.
Mr. Vannucci asked the location of Mr. Sewell's property stating that he needs to keep the septic
away from the stream.
Commissioner Lambert said that requiring bark collars is an option for Development Services to
apply if there are complaints.
The hearing was closed.
Chairman Mooney said that Condition 12 to remove the junk is a code enforcement issue.
Mr. Vannucci said that he had not been notified of any relevant junk complaint.
There was a discussion on not replacing dogs as they die. Ms. Castillo said the dogs are easily
identified.
It was moved by Commissioner Lambert, seconded by Commissioner Leland, and unanimously
carried to approve the Use Permit for Robert Vannucci subject to the findings and conditions listed
below, adding a new Condition 7 to read "The applicant shall identify a location for the proposed
kennel building toward the center of the property. The new location shall be chosen such that the
existing home or barn may provide noise attenuation for the neighbor to the south. Planning
Division staff shall review and approve the location of the proposed kennel building."; add
Condition 12 to read "Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall remove all refuse/junk on-site
according to County code provisions and contact Butte County Code Enforcement to verify that
refuse/junk has been removed."; add Condition 18 to read "The kennel permit required by the
applicant to establish the kennel use shall be obtained from the Animal Control Division within 30
days of the issuance of the Use Permit. All conditions required by the Animal Control Division shall
be implemented prior to issuance of the kennel permit."; add Condition 19 to read "The Use Permit
is limited to a maximum of 8 dogs. The 12 dogs that are kept by the applicant at the time of the
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 MINUTES ■ APRIL 25, 2002 0 PAGE 8 0
approval of the Use Permit are allowed, and are required to be registered with the Animal Control
Division. The existing 12 dogs are allowed until they are reduced in number by attrition. The
applicant is required to prepare records of the 12 dogs' name, age, sex, and breed; provide the
Animal Control Division with these records; notify the Animal Control Division when any of the
dogs die."; and add Condition 20 to read "The Animal Control Division shall inspect the kennel
quarterly for the first year of issuance of the Use Permit, and annually thereafter. Any
recommendations made by the Animal Control Division to address environmental, planning,
nuisance, safety, or sanitary conditions at the subject site shall be implemented and financed by the
applicant. Should measures fail to be implemented, the Use Permit shall be referred to the Planning
Commission for findings necessary for revocation of the Use Permit."
I. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings:
A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act,. Said study identified significant environmental effects and included
mitigation measures that would mitigate such effects below significant levels; a
Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed.
B. The Development Review Committee has considered the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process.
C. On the basis of the whole record before the Development Review Committee,
including the Initial Study and any comments received, there is no substantial
evidence that the Use Permit for Robert Vannucci, Planning Division File No. UP
02-10, will have a significant effect on the environment.
D. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and
analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency.
E. This project will not have an impact to fish and/or wildlife habitat pursuant to Fish
and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5.
II. Approve Use Permit 02-10 for Robert Vannucci, subject to the following findings and the
conditions in Exhibit "A":
A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use
are in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in
which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development
policies and standards of the County because: Conditions of approval have been
applied to this project after CEQA review. The project is in accordance with the
purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because
the project site is designated Low Density Residential. The Low Density Residential
land use designation allows animal husbandry as a Secondary Use. The A-5 zone
allows kennels with approval of a Use Permit.
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES 0 APRIL 25, 2002 ■ PAGE 9 ■
B. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use would
be compatible with, and would not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent
uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given
to:
1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density:
The proposed project will involve minor improvements to the property
including a septic system to handle the dog waste that will be required to
comply with County Improvement Standards and a kennel building that will
be required to comply with Uniform Building Code requirements. Otherwise,
no changes to buildings or density are proposed.
2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities:
No additional services are needed to accommodate this project.
3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character:
The nearest residential dwelling is located at the eastern end of Craig
Avenue, approximately 400 feet from the proposed project site. The proposed
project site is buffered not only by distance but also by trees between the
proposed site and the nearest residence. Various domesticated animals are
being kept at nearby properties, and as such the proposal would not
necessarily adversely affect neighborhood character as long as the
conditions specified in the Initial Study and in Exhibit A are followed.
5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or proposed
development:
The site is suited for the project because the property is located in a
predominantly agricultural area with some very low-density residential
development and because the proposed use is allowed with the issuance of
a Use Permit.
6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use:
The Planning Division has circulated the proposed kennel application to
County agencies and has received responses that indicated there is no
evidence that the use, with appropriate conditions, would cause any other
relevant planning -related impact. The project would require a kennel permit
from the Animal Control Division of the Environmental Health Department.
The findings and criteria for this type of permit are different than the
findings and criteria for the Use Permit. If this Use Permit is approved, its
approval does not preclude the Animal Control Division from denying the
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 MINUTES 0 APRIL 25, 2002 0 PAGE 10 0
•
kennel permit. The planning -related impacts of this project appear to be
minor in general, assuming all conditions are dutifully executed.
C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating
characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be
operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Conditions of Approval:
Planning Division:
1. The project applicant shall prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog waste, which shall be
submitted to the Environmental Health Department for approval in conjunction with their
review of the septic system. The project applicant shall implement any measures recommended
by the Environmental Health Department and Animal Control Division for disposing of the dog
waste. M m
2. The applicant shall provide for percolation and other tests deemed necessary by, and to the
satisfaction of, the Department of Environmental Health for the septic system proposed on-
site. All feasible measures recommended by the Department of Environmental Health to
reduce potential impacts associated with the septic system shall be implemented. The
Department of Environmental Health will also assess the applicant's plans regarding outdoor
dog waste to ensure that the project will not significantly degrade water quality. Any feasible
measures recommended by the Department of Environmental Health to reduce water quality
impacts shall be implemented by the project applicant. mm
3. As a condition of the approval of the Use Permit, the applicant is required to prepare and
submit four sets of construction plans and make an application for a Building Permit.
Construction shall comply with federal, State, and local regulations. Plans shall be prepared,
sealed and signed by a California Licensed Architect or Registered Engineer for non-
residential buildings and certain residential buildings. The following conditions shall be
placed on the building plans: M M
• Identify the usable sewage disposal area proved to meet the requirements of the County
Improvement Standards Appendix VII.
• Place a note on the map that states that no water well maybe placed within 100 feet of
the Usable Sewage Disposal Area.
4. Proposed improvements shall comply with Title 24 energy conservation regulations.
Appropriate compliance forms (two sets) shall be submitted indicating compliance with
those standards.
5. Development fees for the proposed residential or non-residential improvements shall be paid
prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
�0 BUTTE'COUNTI' PLANNING COMMISSION 0 MINUTES 0 APRIL 25, 2002 0 PAGE 11 ■
W
6. The applicant must comply with Uniform Building Code requirements for property line
clearances considering use, area, and fire -restiveness of existing buildings.
7. The applicant shall identify a location for the proposed kennel building toward the center of
the property. The new location shall be chosen such that the existing home or barn may
provide noise attenuation for the neighbor to the south. Planning Division staff shall review
and approve the precise location of the proposed kennel building. The established noise level
standards is 65 dBs maximum at the property line. If complaints are filed with the Planning
Commission in the future and the Commission requires a noise study, the study shall be paid
for by the applicant.
8. If the Department of Development Services or other County departments receive noise -
related complaints regarding the project and the level of noise is in excess of established
standards, the applicant shall implement recommendations of the Department of
Development Services to reduce the noise impacts. In response to any pattern of noise
complaints, the Development Services Department, at the expense of the applicant, shall
conduct a noise analysis to establish the compliance of the project with standards in the
Noise Element of the General Plan. Currently, the Noise Element establishes that acceptable
levels of noise for the project area of up to 60 decibels Ldn or CNEL. If noise levels are in
excess of established standards, the project applicant is required to reduce noise levels
through recommendations of the Development Services Department, which may include, but
are not limited to, keeping the dogs inside the kennel building at noise -sensitive times of the
day, building noise attenuation devices that provide some relief to nearby homes, installation
of doors or sound insulation in the kennel building, limiting the applicant to a particular
number or size of dogs based on noise levels, or other recommendations. Any implemented
recommendations to reduce noise would be subject to Building Permits and other applicable
conditions. M W\
9. The installation of the kennel building shall comply with all applicable building and electrical
codes. It
10. All facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six months shall be considered
abandoned. Abandoned facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances,
requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that
the facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to return the site to its original
condition within 30 calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If the site is not returned to
its original condition within 30 days, the County may do so at the applicant's and/or land
owner's joint expense. -
11. The facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the
unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the
County.
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES 0 APRIL 25, 20010 PAGE 12 0
12. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall remove all refuse/junk on-site according to
County code provisions and contact Butte County Code Enforcement to verify that
refuse/junk has been removed.
13. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field
inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met.
14. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and
regulations.
Building Division
15. Building permits are required for the kennel building. Applicant must provide plans and
calculations prepared, sealed, and signed by a California licensed architect or registered
engineer verifying adequacy of building for proposed use. Design shall be in compliance
with the 1998 California Building Codes.
Environmental Health Department
16. Obtain a permit to operate a kennel from Butte County Health Department, Animal Control
Division
17. Under County permits, establish new septic collection and disposal system and make other
improvements or changes in operational plans necessary to dispose of the dog waste as
determined through Environmental Health Department review.
18. The kennel permit required by the applicant to establish the kennel use shall be obtained from
the Animal Control Division within 30 days of the issuance of the Use Permit. All
conditions required by the Animal Control Division shall be implemented prior to issuance
of the kennel permit.
19. The Use Permit is limited to a maximum of 8 dogs. The 12 dogs that are kept by the
applicant at the time of the approval of the Use Permit are allowed, and are required to be
registered with the Animal Control Division. The existing 12 dogs are allowed until they are
reduced in number by attrition. The applicant is required to prepare records of the 12 dogs'
name, age, sex, and breed; provide the Animal Control Division with these records; and
notify the Animal Control Division when any of the dogs die.
20. The Animal Control Division shall inspect the kennel quarterly for the first year of issuance
of the Use Permit, and annually thereafter. Any recommendations made by the Animal
Control Division to address environmental, planning, nuisance, safety, or sanitary conditions
at the subject site shall be implemented and financed by the applicant. Should measures fail
to be implemented, the Use Permit shall be referred to the Planning Commission for findings
necessary for revocation of the Use Permit.
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 MINUTES ■ APRIL 25, 2002 0 PAGE 13 0
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPM T SERVICES
BUTI W--, COUNTY UNIFORM AP CATION
\PPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side:
APPLICANT'S NAME (Ifapplicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL BER:
Z1141-1welecil 0,;) 7— 0740 — 0—?v
A D D R FSS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE)
—1.fb11e1e.414'A1,g , up ol-;I-fo
NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) TELEPHONE
LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross streets and Address, if any
C,eoq i Ale Ala
GEMERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED
OWNER'S NAME
��0&567-
TELEPHONE
E3 MINOR USE PERMIT
030)-533 -7,?7-3
ADDRESS:
CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE:
4
2001
ZONE
GENERAL PLAN
EXISTING LAND USE
SITE SIZE (in Square Feet orAcres )
9'00�Ar S
EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet)
BUTTE
PLANNING
PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet)
><
(Check One)
(Check One)
0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED
13 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER
PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC
PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER
APPLICATION REQUESTED
0 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
C3 REZONE
C3 USE PERMIT
E rCll E 0 1W E
E3 MINOR USE PERMIT
D EC
18
2001
13 VARIANCE
0 MINOR VARIANCE
BUTTE
PLANNING
COUNTY
DIVISION
C3 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP
BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION
LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION
CERTIFICATE OF MERGER
C3 ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT 0 MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN
1:3 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT *,OTHER
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and
size of parcels.)
7—V
OWNER CERTIFICATION
ICERTIFY THAT IAN11 PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY.
FURTHER. I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authecized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.)
DATE: -�D SIGNATURE:-�Z--
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
To Butte County, Department of Development Services;
Print Name of Agent and Phone Number
is hereby authorized to process this application for
on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor
This authorization allows representation for all ap
pll
documents necessary for said processing, but n me
interest.
Owner(s) of Record: (sign and printme)
Print Name
Signature
Architect pfd/or Engineer:
of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number
Mailing Address
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Verify:
Date Received:
Number
hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all
document(s) relating to record title
Print Name
Signature
Total Amount Received: !0 7,?
SAP Number(s) --Legal Description
---Owners Authorization Zoning Requirements
Project Description ✓ Copies of plot plan
Taken by Receipt No. 00101 E.H. �Z�S' LD /SO Plan. FD q-7
17-0-0
Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit)
will be returned upon final action.
Current fee for this application is $ 10 7 8 as of
Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer".
COUNTY OF BUTTE
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
(To be Completed By Project Applica
Date Filed
_General Information:
1.
2.
3.
4.
D DEC 1 8 2001 D
er, and/or developer, and/or project sponsor:
/ _ _
Address of project:_ YW1
Assessor's Parcel Number:
BUTTE COUNTY
PANNING DIVISION
List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including
those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
5. Existing general plan designation:
6. Existing zoning district: A
7. How is land currently used?
91
Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed):
Project Description:
9. Site size:_
cres Sq.
Feet)
10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: )C Compact: Total:
11. Plans attached Yes —No
12. Proposed development schedule 17A,-»✓�/�,ow / ��.y _VO2-
, --
13. Associated projects
14. Anticipated incremental or phased development 6,077Ald9=
Attach description of project containing the following information:
15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of
household size expected.
16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales
area and loading facilities.
17: If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.
18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading
❑ Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O
1
•
facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project.
19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this
and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as
Exhibit
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked
yes (attach additional sheets as necessary).
YES NO
20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons
or substantial alteration of ground contours. _
21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential
areas or public lands or roads.
22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. _
23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. _ 4
24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. . _ 4-
25.
Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality
or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns.
26.
Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels
in the vicinity. _
27.
Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. _
28.
Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials,
such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. _
29.
Substantial change in demand for municipal services
(police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts).
30.
Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption
(electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
31.
Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. _
O Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O
2
Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description)
32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability,
plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe. any existing structures on the
site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be
accepted.
33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical,
or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -
family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-
back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted.
Certification
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information
required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented
are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date Signature for
K:\FORMS\SUBMITTAL\ENV-INFO
0 Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O
3
--,1 "J/ --1, 7!1/i1f.1•u\i.1/ /W/^ — .dIA- "A 2. r. LT/..o— !J..__ /.-- "./JL—
,jaw- � G
It�
SII - �' • � .
Ili
--,1 "J/ --1, 7!1/i1f.1•u\i.1/ /W/^ — .dIA- "A 2. r. LT/..o— !J..__ /.-- "./JL—
��:v�/V+�I°^�'��f/�"A,�:�:�_yI^!/I�sI'�/'E���I�Ia�i�rvw.r/iy
SII - �' • � .
BUTTE COUNTY
PLANNING DIVISION
.'t.���
.
• it ¢.. ��YJ � ,
�
��. ,d r-��� `.j �' 4 �1• Vii} �y t1 j!: Iij
,�: �� j�r�,. � :l�
L`�� '.. �.� it
� i
E
USE PERMIT
APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST
This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their
application packet. Please include this checklist along with your. submittal.
Applicant Planner
1. L"J A completed, signed, Uniform Application nand Environmental Information form. If the
application is signed by an agent for the property owner, an agent authorization for must
be submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted
unless signed by the owner or authorized agent.
2. E3 Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unusedP ortion of
the deposit will be returned upon final action, if any remains.) (Planner advises applicant)
3. ❑ ❑Thirty-five(35) copies of plans which shall include a detailed site plan drawn to scale. All
plans shall be drawn on uniform size sheets no greater than 24" x 36". The finished plans
shall be folded to 8 %Z" x 11 ". The detailed site plan must include:
a. 0 13-- Name and address of Applicant, Engineer and/or person who prepared the plan
b. Ll IT Property lines and lot dimensions
C. ❑�^� Assessor Parcel Number(s) and the street address. , +
d. ❑� ❑� Proposed use and/or uses of the property.
e. ❑ Proposed landscaping plan, if applicable.
f. Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvejents on the property
(including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, parking dea�s., wells, septic tanks
and leach fields). ..z,
_'
g. E Distances from any significant.natural and constructed features of the property, such
as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major tree stands, storm drains,
bodies of water, railroads, to the property lines.
IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE.
I
!.
h. Location of all slope banks, ponds, creeks, buttes, sloughs, rock outcroppings, natural
drainage courses, irrigation canals and existing vegetation worthy of consideration for
preservation, such as oak trees.
I. U Any existing faults or fractures and geologic hazards.
j. U' [ North arrow and scale of drawing. All plans shall be drawn to an engineering scale
with the preferred scale of 1" = 20', with a north arrow preferably oriented to the ton
mot.
k• �� All plans must be clear and legible.
4. ❑ ❑ One copy of 8 %2" x 11" transparency reduction of the detailed site plan.
5. ❑ ❑ A vicinity map showing closest major cross streets, zoning and existing land use.
6. ❑ ❑ One (1) set of colored plans mounted on foam boards, which shall include an illustrative site
plan, illustrative building elevations, and any necessary cross-sections. Portions of this
requirement may be waived by the Planning Manager. Portions waved ❑ YES ❑ NO
7.
8.
9.
❑ ❑ One (1) full size reproducible sepia for each sheet in the plan set of the detailed site plan.
❑ - ❑ Building materials on a sample board, 8 %2" X 11 ".
❑ ❑ Detailed site plan including the following:
a. ❑ ❑ Building setbacks from the ultimate road right-of-way (front, rear, sides).
b• ❑ ❑ Proposed and existing on-site driveways and/or roads.
C. ❑ ❑ Location, height, and materials of walls and fences (sections may be required).
d• ❑ ❑ All driveways, drawn to scale, on iacent and across the street 1L rti s within
100 feet of the subject site.
IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE.
2
e. ❑ ❑ Existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks and existing paving widths on-site or within 100
feet of the site, on adjacent and across the street properties.
f. ❑ ❑ Typical street section(s).
g. ❑ ❑ Nearest cross streets on both sides with plus or minus distances from subject site.
h.. ❑ ❑ Approximate location of all buildings within 100 feet, on a jacent 1L rti c.
I. ❑ ❑ Proposed method of sewer and water connection or alternative method of sewage
disposal and potable water supply.
j . ❑ ❑ ' 'Existing and nearest fire hydrants.
k. ❑ ❑ Access, both pedestrian and vehicular, showing.service areas and points of ingress and
egress.
1. ❑ ❑ Internal circulation pattern.
m. ❑ ❑ Elevation contours, at a minimum per USGS maps.
10. ❑ ❑ Illustrative Site Plan
The plan should include a graphic scale and north arrow, all proposed and existing improvements, landscape
concepts such as earth mounding and meandering walkways, walls, ground cover, trees, shrubs, shadows, paving
and other elements as may be necessary to illustrate the site plan. (Dimensions may be excluded from this plan.)
11. ❑ ❑ Conceptual Grading Plan
Items to be shown include:
a. ❑ ❑ Natural areas to be preserved.
b. ❑ -❑ Proposed cut and fill areas in contrasting colors of zipatone pattern.
C. ❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contours within 100 feet of project boundaries.
IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMM ED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE.
3
L12
d. ❑ ❑ Proposed drainage and flood control facilities.
e. ❑ ❑ Erosion control measures (e.g. - slope landscaping).
f. ❑ ❑ Natural drainage.
g. ❑ ❑ Elevations and finished contours.
h. ❑ ❑ Location of retaining walls, drainage channels and existing structures.
I. ❑� Location, elevation and size of proposed building pads.
12. ❑ ❑ Illustrative Building Elevations
Illustrative building elevations showing all sides of existing and proposed buildings and structures. Illustrative
building elevations means architectural elevations showing typical materials to be used, trees, landscaping and
shadows to give the elevations graphic dimension.
Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the above
submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by
the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire
Department, or Agriculture Commissioner.
Signature: z4,L/
Applicant/Repres ative
Signature:
�" 4 4"e'- --
Planner/Receiving Application
K:\FORMS\SUBMITAL\CHECKIIS\USEPERNU.FRM
Date ;�-e— /`/, wo/
Date: IV Oc'Z of CO(
IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMn-MD, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE.
4
K:\PROJECTS\UPC\VANNUCCI\up0210
maillist.doc
027240052000
CONWAY ERNEST SS
2930 DALY AVENUE
OROVILLE CA 95966
027270014000
HUTTS GLORIA
3003 CRAIG AVE
OROVILLE CA 95965
027270029000
MOLAISON DONALD R & NONA L
86 MONTANA AVE
OROVILLE CA 95965
027270036000
PERIGO MARY KAY
8000 RESERVOIR RD
OROVILLE CA 95966
027270042000
MULLER ALVIN & GRETCHEN D
100 ARROWHEAD CT
VACAVILLE CA 95687
END MAIL LIST
is
027270034000 027240038000
VANNUCCI ROBERT J & SYLVIA R WOODS DOROTHY E
3011 CRAIG AVE 2967 CRAIG AVE
OROVILLE CA 95966 OROVILLE CA 95966
027240072000 027250008000
SEWELL KENNETH SCARPACE MARTIN & DOROTHY
1 DOVE CREEK CT P 0 BOX 6358
CHICO CA 95926 SAN JOSE CA 95150
027270022000 027270025000
MATTHEWS JOANN E FAIRBANKS* GARY L & BRENDA T
74 MONTANA 3032 LOUIS AVE
OROVILLE CA 95966 OROVILLE CA 95966
027270030000 027270033000
ANDROUS BOBBY W & MELODY, M LINDGREN JOHN W
P 0 BOX 544 2985 CRAIG AVE
PALERMO CA 95968 OROVILLE CA 95966
027270037000 027270038000
PRUITT GARY L & ROBIN L AKERS HAROLD T & NANCY J
60 MONTANA AVE 38 MONTANA AVE
OROVILLE CA 95966 OROVILLE CA 95966
027270043000 027270044000
HARMS GEORGE G & VERNA CREAMER DOROTHY & BERNIE
3416 JOHN LEE IN 121 BLEDSOE CT
MODESTO CA 95350-0926 OROVILLE CA 95966
4 tr►'TS (r
5
,� Postal
o•
.3 ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT
.. Only;
r�
- r ,v. , rrm1
t.
r_ Aw. t—...4tjr. �►
„� • Postage $ r
= certified Fee -`. , Y F tt L-;. IV- , .. o AV, r'A I
li :'t t -� b ostmark — e -..:.L
Return RetuReceipt Fee.
Q(Endorsement Required) ilu e't' � 4 t i' '� t \�. + Here t L
C3 Restricted nt Required)
: �� 9 ta . -1 r\ C-44� M.'=.5. kot
C3 (Endorsement Required)
Total Postage &Fees �r
per^ Sent µ,� 4 `.
`Robert �J Vannucci 1 i
srreer +q l --------
C3 ty 3011,Grargvenue ar
r
p c► Si,�t++�a `"�rlf
r- :O rovi'11.e,,GA��95.9.66'i
■ Complete items 1 „-,Wd 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
A. Signature
❑ Agent
&e� �10�46 ❑ Addressee
B. Receive y (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
r.
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: '❑ No
3.
RX/Ce 'fiee_.PfExpr s Mail
❑ Regis ❑ urn Receipt
❑ Insured C.O.D.
(A - P Oa -JO 14. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number
(Transfer from service
UNITED STATES SERVICE rst-Class Mail
stage &Fees Paid
ASPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
,COUNTY OF BUTTE
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 959653397
I _
�lY
Eatte county
LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530) 538-7785
July 12, 2002
Robert J. Vannucci
3011 Craig Avenue
Oroville, CA 95966
CERTIFIED MAIL
Re: Use Permit UP 02-10, AP 027-270-034,
Y
Mr. Vannucci:
Enclosed is your validated Use Permit No. UP 02-10 to allow Use Permit to allow for a private (non-
commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone to house owners personal dogs. located at Craig Avenue,
a private road off of Reservoir Road, a northerly extension of Ontario Road.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.m.
and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
lQ,���e-u
Diane Lewellen
Office Assistant III
Enc.
cc: Land Development Division (G)
Building Division (Y)
Environmental Health (P)
Department of Forestry (Gid)
USE PERMIT
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ML 12
20
DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.)
UP 02-10
PERMIT NO.
027-270-034
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special
conditions set forth below. Robert .Vanucci is hereby granted a Use Permit to establish a private
dog kennel for boarding of more than five dogs on APN 027-270-034 on Craig Avenue, subject
to the following conditions:
1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of
application and issuance of Permit constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance,
including Butte County Code Sec. 24=45.65.
2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Use Permit, all conditions
must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use.
The use granted by this permit must be established within two years of the date of
approval.
3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development
Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written
request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification
shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the
application, fees paid, and environmental determination as conditionally approved.
Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for
amendment.
4. If any use for which a Use Permit has been granted is not established within two years of
the receipt of the Permit by the Permittee, the Permit shall become null and void and
reapplication pursuant to Section 24-45 (of the Zoning Code) shall be required to
establish the use previously granted under the expired Permit unless, 30 days prior to the
expiration date, a request for a one-year extension is submitted to the Planning
Commission together with sufficient evidence that the time limits for processing
development permits under federal or State regulations require time limits which exceed
one year. Upon application, and for good .cause by the Permittee, at a public hearing
pursuant to Section 24-45.25 above, the Planning Commission may extend any time
limitation previously made apart of any condition to a Use Permit.
1
5. The terms and conditions of this Permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon
and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the
Permittee.
6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally
omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged
material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development
Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute
sufficient grounds to revoke a Permit.
Conditions of Approval:
Planning Division:
1. The project applicant shall prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog waste, which shall be
submitted to the Environmental Health Department for approval in conjunction with their
review of the septic system. The project applicant shall implement any measures
recommended by the Environmental Health Department and Animal Control Division for
disposing of the dog waste.
2. The applicant shall provide for percolation and other tests deemed necessary by, and to
the satisfaction of, the Department of Environmental Health for the septic system
proposed on-site. All feasible measures recommended by the Department of
Environmental Health to reduce potential impacts associated with the septic system shall
be implemented. The Department of Environmental . Health will also assess the
applicant's plans regarding outdoor dog waste to ensure that the project will. not
significantly degrade water quality. Any feasible measures recommended by the
Department of Environmental Health to reduce water quality impacts shall be
implemented by the project applicant.
3. As a condition of the approval of the Use Permit, the applicant is required to prepare and
submit four sets of construction plans and make an application for a Building Permit.
Construction shall comply with federal, State, and local regulations. Plans shall be
prepared, sealed and signed by a California Licensed Architect or Registered Engineer
for non-residential buildings and certain residential buildings. The following conditions
shall be placed on the building plans:
• Identify the usable sewage disposal area proved to meet the requirements of the
County Improvement Standards Appendix VII.
• Place a note on the map that states that no water well may be placed within 100 feet
of the Usable Sewage Disposal Area.
4. Proposed improvements shall comply with Title 24 energy conservation regulations.
Appropriate compliance forms (two sets) shall be submitted indicating compliance with
those standards.
2
5. Development fees for the proposed residential or non-residential improvements shall be
paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
6. The applicant must comply with Uniform Building Code requirements for property line
clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistiveness of existing buildings.
7. The applicant shall identify a location for the proposed kennel building toward the center
of the property. The new location shall be chosen such that the existing home or barn
may provide noise attenuation for the neighbor to the south. Planning Division staff shall
review and approve the precise location of the proposed kennel building. The established
noise level standards is 65 dBs maximum at the property line. If complaints are filed
with the Planning Commission in the future and the Commission requires a noise study,
the study shall be paid for by the applicant.
8. If the Department of Development Services or other County departments receive noise -
related complaints regarding the project and the level of noise is in excess of established
standards, the applicant shall implement recommendations of the Department of
Development Services to reduce the noise impacts. In response to any pattern of noise
complaints, the Development Services Department, at the expense of the, applicant, shall
conduct a noise analysis to establish the compliance of the project with standards in the
Noise Element of the General Plan. Currently, the Noise Element establishes that
acceptable levels of noise for the project area of up to 60 decibels Ldn or CNEL. If noise
levels are in excess of established standards, the project applicant is required to reduce
noise levels through recommendations of the Development Services Department, which
may include, but are not limited to, keeping the dogs inside the kennel building at noise -
sensitive times of the day, building noise attenuation devices that provide some relief to
nearby homes, installation of doors or sound insulation in the kennel building, limiting
the applicant to a particular number or size of dogs based on noise levels, or other
recommendations. Any implemented recommendations to reduce noise would be subject
to Building Permits and other applicable conditions.
9. The installation of the kennel building shall comply with all applicable building and
electrical codes.
10. All facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six months shall be considered
abandoned. Abandoned facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public
nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services
determines that the facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to return the site
to its original condition within 30 calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If the site is
not returned to its original condition within 30 days, the County may do so at the
applicant's and/or land owner's joint expense.
11. The facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the
unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from
the County.
3
12. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall remove all refuse/junk on-site according to
County code provisions and contact Butte County Code Enforcement to verify that
refuse/junk has been removed.
13. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field
inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met.
14. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances,
and regulations.
Building Division
15. Building permits are required for the kennel building. Applicant must provide plans and
calculations prepared, sealed, and signed by a California licensed architect or registered
engineer verifying adequacy of building for proposed use. Design shall be in compliance
with the 1998 California Building Codes.
Environmental Health Department
16. Obtain a permit to operate a kennel from Butte County Health Department, Animal
Control Division
17. Under County permits, establish new septic collection and disposal system and make
other improvements or changes in operational plans necessary to dispose of the dog waste
as determined through Environmental Health Department review.
18. The kennel permit required by the applicant to establish the kennel use shall be obtained
from the Animal Control Division within 30 days of the issuance of the Use Permit. All
conditions required, by the Animal Control Division shall be implemented prior to
issuance of the kennel permit.
19. The Use Permit is limited to a maximum of 8 dogs. The 12 dogs that are kept by the
applicant at the time of the approval of the Use Permit are allowed, and are required to be
registered with the Animal Control Division. The existing 12 dogs are allowed until they
are reduced in number by attrition. The applicant is required to prepare records of the 12
dogs' .name, age, sex, and breed; provide the Animal Control Division with these records;
and notify the Animal Control Division when any of the dogs die.
20. The Animal Control Division shall inspect the kennel quarterly for the first year of
issuance of the Use Permit, and annually thereafter. Any recommendations made by the
Animal Control Division to address environmental, planning, nuisance, safety, or sanitary
conditions at the subject site shall be implemented and financed by the applicant.. Should
measures fail to be implemented, the Use Permit shall be referred to the Planning
Commission for findings necessary for revocation of the Use Permit.
4
I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that
they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that
I agree to abide fully by said conditions.
Date: 200Z o-
Applicant
NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining ' Building and
Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other
requirements.
R�
Butte County Planning Commission Chai
CC: Land Development Division
Building Division
Environmental Health Department
Assessor
5
E
N
r
I
N
I
I
I
I
I
I ��•- PO4
I'
I
-Die J '
�p 0/
A -
3(y)
I
� o .
I �
I W
i
I � ,
I
I
I . ,
J
I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ �\
I
I
I _
r
APPROVED
Development Plan
DATE 12 rO
v E
USE PERMIT/ --VARIANCE
8 2001
MINOR U.P. _---ADM.PERMIT
PLANNING COMMISS. G DTTE TY
NS N
DIRECTOR OF
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TO:
FROM:
MEMORANDUM
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Butte County Assessor's Office
Butte County Planning Department
SUBJECT: Robert J. Vannucci, UP 02-10
DATE: July 12, 2002
Pursuant to Section 65863.5 of the Government Code, the following parcel identified as
027-270-034, was:
Rezone from to zoning district.
Granted a variance to
X Issued a conditional Use Permit Use Permit to allow for a private (non-
commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone to house owners personal dogs.,
Craig Avenue, a private road off of Reservoir Road, a northerly extension of
Ontario Road, zoned A-5
00—�
44 L.
Suite Count,
April 26, 2002
Robert J. Vannucci
3011 Craig,Avenue
Oroville, CA 95966
Re: Use Permit, AP, UP 02-10
Dear Mr. Vannucci:
L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • .OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530) 538-7785
At the regular meeting of.the Butte County Planning Commission held April 25, 2002, your request for a Use
Permit to allow for a private (non-commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone to house owners personal dogs.,
was approved subject to the conditions listed on the enclosures.
Should you desire to appeal any of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, you must do so in
writing, to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to 5:00
p.m., Monday, May 6, 2002. The appeal fee of $50.00 must be paid at that time. If you do not appeal and
if there are no other appeal within the 10 calendar -day appeal period, the action of the Planning Commission
is final
A Notice of Determination (NOD) should be filed for purpose of completing the California environmental
quality Act requirements. The fee for filing the NOD is a $25.00 document handling fee. A check made
payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $25.00 should be submitted to the Planning Division
in order to complete the process.
Please sign both copies of the Use Permit and return them to this Division. You must sign the Use
Permit within thirty (30) days of the expiration of the appeal period. Both signed copies must be
received, by this Division, within forty (40) days from approval of the permit by the Planning
Commission.
The Use Permit is deemed granted when the enclosures have been signed by the applicant, with the counter
signature of the Chairman of the Planning Commission, and said permit is received by the applicant by
certified mail.
Pursuant to Section 66020 (d) (2) of the Government Code you are hereby notified that you have 90 days*to
register a protest challenging any fees, dedications, reservations, or exactions imposed as conditions of
approval for this project.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact M. A. Meleka at this office between
8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
Lynn Richardson
Planning/Administrative
Support Service Assistant
Ar
k:\fonns\approvup.fmi
4
_ �,.,_..._,., �+ -e- µ ' ,e,^d_.."�. ate••....
March 29, 2002
,Butt¢ C
L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH AND B E A U T Y
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530)538-7785
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AND
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be
held on April 25, 2002, at 9:30 A.M. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room County
Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, at 9:30 a.m. regarding the
following item
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been
prepared for the following project:
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/USE PERMIT
Robert Vannucci, Use Permit to allow a private dog kennel on property with one single-family
dwelling and accessory structures. The Use Permit would allow the boarding of Vanucci's personal
dogs. A maximum of 12 dogs is anticipated, according to the project applicant. The dogs would be
kept in a proposed kennel building and surrounding fenced area. An additional septic system on-
site is proposed to handle waste from the dogs. Sanitary sewer service for the house on-site is, and
would continue to be, provided by a septic tank. Water is, and would continue to be, obtained
from wells on the site. Construction of the kennel building, notwithstanding provisions of this
Initial Study, will require a Building Permit, and the applicant will be required to comply with
any conditions associated with the Building Permit process. The applicant would be required to
obtain a sewage disposal permit for the additions to the septic system from the Environmental
Health Department. The property is zoned A-5 (Agricultural, 5 -acre parcels) and is located at
3011 Craig Avenue (Craig Avenue is a private road accessible via Palermo Honcutt), Oroville
area. APN# 027-270-034 (CS) (UP 02-10)
The initial study for the project identifies potentially significant effects, but revisions in the
project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the effects or
would occur. Therefore,
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects
Planning Division staff is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declarg
0 a R
APR 3 2002
XANDACE iRUBBs. BUTTE CO. CLERK
The Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project are on file
for public review starting, April 5, 2002, through April 24, 2002, at the Butte County Planning
Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. All interested persons are invited to
review the document. Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above
address.
If you challenge either the Mitigated Negative Declaration or the Use Permit in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described
in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the
public hearing:
For further information regarding this project, please contact Craig Sanders, project planner, at
the Butte County Planning Division at (530) 538-7603.
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION
FRED DAVIS, INTERIM DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
To be published in the Oroville Mercury on Friday, April 5, 2002.
DECLARATION OF FEES D*
(California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4)
NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT
Robert J. Vannucci
3011 Craig Avenue
Oroville, CA 95966
FILING NO..
Project Title/file number:
UP 02-10, USE PERMIT
CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT:
1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION
O A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt
$25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee
(X) B. De Minunus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption
$25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee
2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED
() , A. Negative Declaration
$1,250 State Filing Fee
$25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee
() B. Environmental Impact Report
$850 State Filing Fee Ey!,
$25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee
3. ( )
OTHER (Specify)
$25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee
PAYMENT /.NON-PAYMENT OF FEES:
1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid.
See attached receipt(s). #20535
2. ( ) NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid.
Chief Planning Official
II'
JUL 1 7 2002 Lbb",
,!
By:
M. A. Meleka
Title:
Principal Planner
Lead Agency:
Butte County Department of
Development Services
Date:
July 15, 2002
TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS
FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE.
THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING.
ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIORTOTHE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH
THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE.
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION 4P
TO: _ Office of Plan.& Research Dept.
1400 Tenth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
X Butte County Clerk
FROM: Butte County Planning
7 County Center Dr., Oroville 95965
SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the
Public Resources Code.
Project Title: UP 02-10, Use Permit
AP Number: 027-270-034
Applicant: . Robert J. Vannucci, 3011 Craig Avenue, Oroville, CA 95966
State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to clearinghouse):
Contact Person: M. A. Meleka Telephone Number: 538-7601
Project Location: Craig Avenue, a private road off of Reservoir Road, a northerly extension of
Ontario Road
Project Description: Use Permit to allow for a private (non-commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone
to house owners personal dogs.
This is to advise that the Butte County Planning Commission has approved the above-described
project on April 25, 2002, and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described
project:
1. The project will, X will not, have a significant effect on the environment.
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigation measures X were, were not, made a condition of the approval of
the project.
4. A statement of overriding considerations was, X was not, adopted for this
project.
This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is
available to the general public at:
Date received for filing and posting at OPR
Butte County
Department of Development Services
7 County teler Drive
Oroville. 5965
M. A. Me
Principal
Mitigation Measures:
1. The project applicant shall prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog waste, which shall be
submitted to the Environmental Health Department for approval in conjunction with their review of
the septic system. The project applicant shall implement any measures recommended by the
Environmental Health Department and Animal Control Division for disposing of the dog waste.
2. The applicant shall provide for percolation and other tests deemed necessary by, and to the
satisfaction of, the Department of Environmental Health for the septic system proposed on-site. All
feasible measures recommended by the Department of Environmental Health to reduce potential
impacts associated with the septic system shall be implemented. The Department of Environmental
Health will also assess the applicant's plans regarding outdoor dog waste to ensure that the project
will not significantly degrade water quality. Any feasible measures recommended by the Department
of Environmental Health to reduce water quality impacts shall be implemented by the project
applicant.
3. As a condition of the approval of the Use Permit, the applicant is required to prepare and submit four
sets of construction plans and make an application for a Building Permit. Construction shall comply
with federal, State, and local regulations. Plans shall be prepared, sealed and signed by a California
Licensed Architect or Registered Engineer for non-residential buildings and certain residential
buildings. The following conditions shall be placed on the building plans:
• Identify the usable sewage disposal area proved to meet the requirements of the County
Improvement Standards Appendix VII.
• Place a note on the map that states that no water well maybe placed within 100 feet of
the Usable Sewage Disposal Area.
4. If the Department of Development Services or other County departments receive noise -related
complaints regarding the project and the level of noise is in excess of established standards, the
applicant shall implement recommendations of the Department of Development Services to reduce
the. noise impacts. In response to any pattern of noise complaints, the Development Services
Department, at the expense ofthe applicant, shall conduct a noise analysis to establish the compliance
of the project with standards in the Noise Element of the General Plan. Currently, the Noise Element
establishes that acceptable levels of noise for the project area of up to 60 decibels Ldn or CNEL. If
noise levels are in excess of established standards, the project applicant is required to reduce noise
levels through recommendations of the Development Services Department, which may include, but
are not limited to, keeping the dogs inside the kennel building at noise -sensitive times of the day,
building noise attenuation devices that provide some relief to nearby homes, installation of doors or
sound insulation in the kennel building, limiting the applicant to a particular number or size of dogs
based on noise levels, or other recommendations. Any implemented recommendations to reduce
noise would be subject to Building Permits and other applicable conditions.
•
•
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
CERTIFICATE OF FILING FEE EXEMPTION
De Minimis Impact Finding
(Fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4; Section 753.5c, Title 14, California Code of Regulations)
Project Title / Butte County Location: UP 02-10, Craig Avenue, a private road off of Reservoir Road,
a northerly extension of Ontario Road
Project Description: Use Permit to allow for a private (non-commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone
to house owners personal dogs.
Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary):
1. The County of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a Negative Declaration so as
to evaluate the potential of this project for adverse environmental impact:
2. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence before the County that the
project will have potential for an adverse impact on wildlife resources or the habitat upon
which the wildlife depends.
3. The County of Butte has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of
adverse effect contained in Section 753.5 (d), of Title 14, California Code of Regulations, if
applicable.
4. The project is hereby found to be de minimis.in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the
State Fish and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code.
Certification:
I hereby certify that the County of Butte has made the above findings of fact and that based
upon the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have
an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game
Code.
By: Il -
M. A. Meleka
Principal Planner
Lead Agency: County of Butte
Date: July 15, 2002
COUNTY OF BUTTE
AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT
OROVILLE, CA
RECEIVED FROM PLANNING
BAG # 316
FUND
DESCRIPTION TITLE
FUND
CODE
DEPT
CODE
ACCT
CODE
ATR NO
DATE
CASH
CODE
44373
5/2812002
AMOUNT
DEPOSIT DATE: 528
RECEIPTS: 20528-20660
PLANNING APPL FEES GENL
0010
480001
4210900
101001
3,339.05
DOCUMENT/COPY SALES GENL
0010
480001
4711910
101001
51.70
NODINOE CLERK'S FILING FE GENL.
0010
470001
4612319
101001
25.00
(M) Project Number
Amount of Fee
UP 02-10-R Vannucci #027-27x034
$25
ENVIRONMENTAL HLTH GENL
0010
540003
4614901
101001
92.00
OProject Number
Amount of Fee
MUP 02-20 C McKenzie #007-012-014
$92
FIRE PLNG APPL FEE FIRE PROTECT
0100
4617240
101001
43.00
Project Number
Amount of Fee
.MUP 02-20 C McKenzie #007-072-014
$43
TOTAL $
3,550.75
APPROVED BY:
AUDITOR -CONTROLLER
RECEIVED BY:
TREASURER
By: b
white --treasurer pink ---auditor canary=deposit.or golden rod=file
c�-- �S II 6S
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT 20535
ISSUED BY
u
•
RECEIPT
TOTAL
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
ENV.
NOE/NOD
DATE
NO.
RECEIVED
WORKS
LAFCO
PLANNING
SALES
HEALTH
FIRE
F/G FEE
OTHER
APPLICANT
RECEIVED FROM
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT 20535
ISSUED BY
u
•
• DECLARATION OF FEES DO
(California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4)
NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT
Robert J. Vannucci
3011 Craig Avenue
Oroville, CA 95966
FILING NO.
Project Title/file number:
UP 02-10, USE PERNUT
CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT:
1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION
() A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt
$25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee
(X) B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption
$25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee
2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED
() ® A. Negative Declaration
$1,250 State Filing Fee
$25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee
() B. Environmental Impact Report
$850 State Filing Fee
$25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee
3. () OTHER (Specify)
$25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee
PAYMENT / NON-PAYMENT OF FEES:
1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid.
See attached receipt(s). #20535
2. ( ) NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid.
Chief Planning Official
JUL 1 7 2002 �.
CANDAF . R B TE CO. CLERK
BY DEPUTY
By: M. A. Meleka
Title: Principal Planner
Lead Agency: Butte Count} Department of
. Development Services
Date: July 15, 2002
TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS
FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE.
THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING.
ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH
THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE.
9 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION •
TO: _ Office of Plan.& Research Dept.
1400 Tenth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
X Butte County.Clerk
FROM: Butte County Planning
7 County Center Dr., Oroville 95965
SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the
Public Resources Code.
Project Title: UP 02-10, Use Permit
AP Number: 027-270-034
Applicant: . Robert J. Vannucci, 3011 Craig Avenue, Oroville, CA 95966
State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to clearinghouse):
Contact Person: M. A. Meleka Telephone Number: 538-7601
Project Location: Craig Avenue, a private road off of Reservoir Road, a northerly extension of
Ontario Road
Project Description: Use Permit to allow for a private (non-commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone
to house owners personal dogs.
This is to advise that the Butte County Planning Commission has approved the above-described
project on April 25, 2002, and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described
project:
1. The project will, X will not, have a significant effect on the environment.
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigation measures X were, were not, made a condition of the approval of
the project.
4. A statement of overriding considerations was, X was not, adopted for this
project.
This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is
available to the general public at:
Date received for filing and posting at OPR
Butte County
Department of Development Services
7 Countya er Drive
Orovillq, 5965
M. A. Mel -1-4
Principal Pla ner
Mitigation Measures:
The project applicant shall prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog waste, which shall be
submitted to the Environmental Health Department for approval in conjunction with their review of
the septic system. The project applicant shall implement any measures recommended by the
Environmental Health Department and Animal Control Division for disposing of the dog waste.
2. The applicant shall provide for percolation and other tests deemed necessary by, and to the
satisfaction of, the Department of Environmental Health for the septic system proposed on-site. All
feasible measures recommended by the Department of Environmental Health to reduce potential
impacts associated with the septic system shall be implemented. The Department of Environmental
Health will also assess the applicant's plans regarding outdoor dog waste to ensure that the project
will not significantly degrade water quality. Any feasible measures recommended by the Department
of Environmental Health to reduce water quality impacts shall be implemented by the project
applicant.
3. As a condition of the approval of the Use Permit, the applicant is required to prepare and submit four
sets of construction plans and make an application for a Building Permit. Construction shall comply
with federal, State, and local regulations. Plans shall be prepared, sealed and signed by a California
Licensed Architect or Registered Engineer for non-residential buildings and certain residential
buildings. The following conditions shall be placed on the building plans:
Identify the usable sewage disposal area proved to meet the requirements of the County
Improvement Standards Appendix VII.
Place a note on the map that states that no water well may be placed within 100 feet of
the Usable Sewage Disposal Area.
4. If the Department of Development Services or other County departments receive noise -related
complaints regarding the project and the level of noise is in excess of established standards, the
applicant shall implement recommendations of the Department of Development Services to reduce
the noise impacts. In response to any patter of noise complaints, the Development Services
Department, at the expense of the applicant, shall conduct a noise analysis to establish the compliance
of the project with standards in the Noise Element of the General Plan. Currently, the Noise Element
establishes that acceptable levels of noise for the project area of up to 60 decibels Ldn or CNEL. If
noise levels are in excess of established standards, the project applicant is required to reduce noise
levels through recommendations of the Development Services Department, which may include, but
are not limited to, keeping the dogs inside the kennel building at noise -sensitive times of the day,
building noise attenuation devices that provide some relief to nearby homes, installation of doors or
sound insulation in the kennel building, limiting the applicant to a particular number or size of dogs
based on noise levels, or other recommendations. Any implemented recommendations to reduce
noise would be subject to Building Permits and other applicable conditions.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
CERTIFICATE OF FILING FEE EXEMPTION
De Minimis Impact Finding
(Fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4; Section 753.5c, Title 14, California Code of Regulations)
Project Title / Butte County Location: UP 02-10, Craig Avenue, a private road off of Reservoir Road,
a northerly extension of Ontario Road
Project Description: Use Permit to allow for a private (non-commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone
to house owners personal dogs.
Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary):
1. The County of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a Negative Declaration so as
to evaluate the potential of this project for adverse environmental impact:
2. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence before the County that the
project will have potential for an adverse impact on wildlife resources or the habitat upon
which the wildlife depends.
3: The County of Butte has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of
adverse effect contained in Section 753.5 (d), of Title 14, California Code of Regulations, if
applicable.
4. The project is hereby found to be de minimis in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the
State Fish and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code.
Certification:
I hereby certify that the County of Butte has made the above findings of fact and that based
upon the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have
an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game
Code.
By: I V'.c =
M. A. Meleka
Principal Planner.
Lead Agency: County of Butte
Date: July 15, 2002
e
COUNTY OF BUTTE
AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT
OROVILLE, CA
RECEIVED FROM PLANNING
BAG # 316
ATR NO
DATE
44373
512812002
FUND
DESCRIPTION TITLE
FUND
CODE
DEPT
CODE
ACCT
CODE
CASH
CODE
AMOUNT
DEPOSIT DATE: 528
RECEIPTS: 2D528 -2D560
PLANNING APPL FEES GENL
0010
480001
4210900
101001
3,339.00
DOCUMENT/COPY SALES GENL
0010
480001
4711910
101001
51.70
NODINOE CLERK'S FILING FE GENL.
0010
470001
4612319
101001
25.00
($25) Project Number
Amount of Fee
UP 02-10-R Vannucci #027-270-034
$25
ENVIRONMENTAL HLTH GENL 0010 540003 4614901 101001 92.00
®Project Number Amount of Fee
MUP 02-20 C McKenzie #007-072-014 $82
FIRE PLNG APPL FEE FIRE PROTECT 0100 4617240. 101001 43.00
Project Number Amount of Fee
MUP 02-20 C McKenzie #007-072-014. $43
TOTAL $ 3,550.75
APPROVED BY:
AUDITOR -CONTROLLER
RECEIVED BY:
TREASURER
By:
white --treasurer pink --auditor canary=depositor golden rod=file
.<<;:..
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT 20535
ISSUED BY
RECEIPT
TOTAL
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
ENV.
NOEMOD
GATE
NO.
RECEIVED
WORKS
LAFCO
PLANNING
SALES
HEALTH
FIRE
F/G FEE
OTHER.
APPLICANT
RECEIVED FROM
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT 20535
ISSUED BY
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT - April 25, 2002
3011 Craig Avenue (Craig
Applicant: Robert Vanucci Location: Avenue is a private road .
accessible via Palermo Honcutt)
File #: . UP 02-10 Parcel Size: 10.4 acres
Use Permit to allow private
Request: kenneling of more than five dogs Zone date: October 7, 1975
in a proposed kennel building.
G.P.: Low -Density Residential Project
Matthew Gerken/planner:
M. A. Meleka
Zoning: A-5 Supervisor
1
District:
A. Conditions of Approval
APN: 027-270-034 Exhibits:
B. Vicinity Map
C. General Plan/Zoning Map
D. Photos of Site
STAFF COMMENT:
Staff recommends approval of the Use Permit with conditions, as specified below and in Exhibit
A.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Robert Vanucci is requesting a Use Permit to allow a private dog kennel on property with one
single-family dwelling and accessory structures. The Use Permit would allow the boarding of
Vanucci's personal dogs. A maximum of 12 dogs is anticipated, according to the project applicant.
The dogs would be kept in a proposed kennel building and surrounding fenced area. An additional
septic system on-site is proposed to handle waste from the dogs. Sanitary sewer service for the
house on-site is, and would continue to be, provided by a septic tank. Water is, and would
continue to be, obtained from wells on the site. Construction of the kennel building,
notwithstanding provisions of this Initial Study, will require a Building Permit, and the applicant
will be required to comply with any conditions associated with the Building Permit process. The
applicant would be required to obtain a sewage disposal permit for the additions to the septic
system from the Environmental Health Department. The applicant would also require a kennel
permit from the Environmental Health Department's Animal Control Division for the kenneling
of more than five dogs — a permit that is contingent upon different criteria than is typically
considered for issuance of Use Permits and other planning entitlements.
The project is located in an area with low-density residential development, orchards, and
undeveloped land. A swale is located toward the center of the property, oriented east to west.
The property is mostly undeveloped grassland, used for grazing, but has one house and one barn.
Some trees and bushes line the swale and surround the home site. A man-made pond on the
property is fed with well water and appears to drain to the aforementioned swale. Two wells on-
site provide water supply to the home. Wastewater is disposed of though the use of a septic tank
and a leachfield area that extends to the north and northeast of the current residence.
The project site is surrounded by an orchard, low-density residential uses, and undeveloped
property. Zoning on all surrounding parcels is A-5 (Agricultural, parcels of more than five acres in
size). A dog kennel for the keeping of up to 12 dogs was approved approximately '/a mile to the
north of the subject property (UP 98-25).
ANALYSIS:
General Plan and Zoning:
The General Plan land use designation of the project site is Low -Density Residential.
The proposed project is located in an area zoned A-5 for agricultural use on parcels of 5 acres or
more in size. The proposal would establish a kennel in a low-density residential and agricultural
area, which is permitted by issuance of a Use Permit. The nearest residential dwelling is located
at the eastern end of Craig Avenue, approximately 400 feet from the proposed project site. The
proposed project site is buffered not only by distance but also by trees between the proposed site
and the nearest residence. For the approval of the Use Permit, the applicant is required to present
information, including plans or other information that is sufficient to allow the Planning
Commission to make an informed decision. The Planning Commission may grant a Use Permit
if.
"The proposed uses of property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in
which the land lies, and that the use would not impair the integrity and character of the
zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible
with, or injurious to, surrounding properties or detrimental to the health and general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or the general health,
welfare, and safety of the residents of the county" (Butte County Code, Section 24-
45.10).
Recent complaints from neighbors and a site visit by Butte County Code Enforcement personnel
indicate that there is refuse/junk on-site. A condition of the Use Permit requires that refuse/junk
on-site be removed in accordance with County code provisions prior to the establishment of the
proposed use.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
The project was reviewed for environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) in accordance with State Law. The following discussion summarizes those issues
and impacts identified in an Initial Study.
•
Air Quality
•
An increase in odor on-site is expected as a result of the keeping of approximately 12 dogs. The
nearest residential dwelling is approximately 400 feet from the proposed project site - a
significant enough distance to allow the odors to dissipate. The project applicant, however, has
not submitted any specific plan for dealing with the dog waste other than establishing an
additional septic system and leachfield. The project site is located in a predominantly
agricultural area with some very low-density residential development where the sensitivity to
such odors is relatively less than would be the case in a residential neighborhood, park,
commercial district, or other sensitive use. A mitigation measure requiring review of the
procedures for dealing with dog waste by the Environmental Health Department is included as a
condition to the issuance of this Use Permit.
H d�rology/Water Quality
The proposed project proposes an additional septic system to accommodate the kenneling of
dogs on-site. The project applicant indicates that water service to the site is from a well, and that
this service will continue. As a condition to the issuance of the Use Permit, the County
Environmental Health Department will review the proposed project and determine whether or
not the project site has adequate soils to ensure proper function of the proposed septic system, a
system which will be required to comply with the County Improvement Standards. The
Environmental Health Department will also review the proposed project for potential well water
quality impacts.
Noise
The project would create additional noise in the area by allowing the keeping of approximately
12 dogs. The dogs would generate some amount of noise, especially when people or cars
approach the project site. The actual level of noise depends on the size and breed of the dogs,
the number of dogs, and the degree to which they are agitated. Typical noise levels associated
with agitated dogs can range from 75 to 85 decibels for seven dogs at 50 feet (Bollard, personal
correspondence). The nearest residential dwelling to the proposed project site is located
approximately 400 feet to the east, and is buffered by trees. Another residence is located
approximately 600 feet to the west. Since distance from a source of noise has an attenuating
effect — for every doubling of distance the level of sound decreases by approximately six
decibels — noise levels at nearby homes from barking dogs can be expected to range from 55 to
70 decibels when the dogs are agitated. The 24-hour equivalent noise level associated with the
dogs depends on the frequency by which they are disturbed, the time of day at which they are
agitated, and their temperament. If kept inside the kennel building, the sound of the dogs'
barking may not be perceptible to people in neighboring buildings.
Given the agricultural zoning and the character of the area, the sensitivity to noise impacts in this
area is relatively lower than other more populated parts of the county. A mitigation measure is
included in the Initial Study and as a condition to the issuance of a Use Permit, which addresses
any noise -related impact. With this condition, if the Department of Development Services or
other County departments receive noise -related complaints regarding the project and the level of
noise is in excess of established standards, the applicant would be required to implement
recommendations of the Department of Development Services to reduce the noise impacts. If
0
•
noise levels in the area are excessive, the Planning Commission will consider revocation of the
Use Permit. Another condition of the Use Permit requires the applicant to identify a different
location for the proposed kennel building toward the interior of the property to put more distance
and existing buildings between the proposed kennel and neighboring property owners.
ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions:
I. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings:
A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act, that said study identified significant environmental effects and
includes mitigation measures that would mitigate such effects below significant
levels, and that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed.
B. The Development Review Committee has considered the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review
process.
C. On the basis of the whole record before the Development Review Committee,
including the Initial Study and any comments received, there is no substantial
evidence that the Use Permit for Robert Vanucci, Planning Division File No. UP
02-10, will have a significant effect on the environment.
D. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment
and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency.
E. This project will not have an impact to fish and/or wildlife habitat pursuant to
Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5.
II. Recommend approval to the Planning Commission of Use Permit 02-10 for Robert
Vanucci, subject to the following findings and the conditions in Exhibit "A":
A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed
use are in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone
in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development
policies and standards of the County because:
Conditions of approval have been applied to this project after CEQA review. The
project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and
the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Low Density
Residential. The Low Density Residential land use designation allows animal
husbandry as a Secondary Use. The A -S zone allows kennels with approval of a
Use Permit.
•
•
B. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use would
be compatible with, and would not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent
uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration
given to:
1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density:
The proposed project will involve minor improvements to the property
including a septic system to handle the dog waste that will be required to
comply with County Improvement Standards and a kennel building that
will be required to comply with Uniform Building Code requirements.
Otherwise, no changes to buildings or density are proposed.
2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities:
No additional services are needed to accommodate this project.
3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character:
The nearest residential dwelling is located at the eastern end of Craig
Avenue, approximately 400 feet from the proposed project site. The
proposed project site is buffered not only by distance but also by trees
between the proposed site and the nearest residence. Various
domesticated animals are being kept at nearby properties, and as such the
proposal would not necessarily adversely affect neighborhood character
as long as the conditions specified in the Initial Study and in Exhibit A are
followed.
5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or proposed
development:
The site is suited for the project because the property is located in a
predominantly agricultural area with some very low-density residential
development and because the proposed use is allowed with the issuance of
a Use Permit.
6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use:
The Planning Division has circulated the proposed kennel application to
County agencies and has received responses that indicated there is no
evidence that the use, with appropriate conditions, would cause any other
relevant planning -related impact. The project would require a kennel
permit from the Animal Control Division of the Environmental Health
Department. The findings and criteria for this type of permit are different
than the findings and criteria for the Use Permit. If this Use Permit is
approved, its approval does not preclude the Animal Control Division
from denying the kennel permit. The planning -related impacts of this
•
•
project appear to be minor in general, assuming all conditions are
dutifully executed.
C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating
characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be
operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Cl
EXHIBIT A
USE PERMIT
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
•
DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.)
UP 02-10
PERMIT NO.
027-270-034
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special
conditions set forth below. Robert Vanucci is hereby granted a Use Permit to establish a private
dog kennel for boarding of more than five dogs on APN 027-270-034 on Craig Avenue, subject
to the following conditions:
1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of
application and issuance of Permit constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance,
including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65.
2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Use Permit, all conditions
must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use.
The use granted by this permit must be established within two years of the date of
approval.
3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development
Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written
request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification
shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the
application, fees paid, and environmental determination as conditionally approved.
Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for
amendment.
4. If any use for which a Use Permit has been granted is not established within two years of
the receipt of the Permit by the Permittee, the Permit shall become null and void and
reapplication pursuant to Section 24-45 (of the Zoning Code) shall be required to
establish the use previously granted under the expired Permit unless, 30 days prior to the
expiration date, a request for a one-year extension is submitted to the 'Planning
Commission together with sufficient evidence that the time limits for processing
development permits under federal or State regulations require time limits which exceed
one year. Upon application, and for good cause by the Permittee, at a public hearing
pursuant to Section 24-45.25 above, the Planning Commission may extend any time
limitation previously made a part of any condition to a Use Permit.
0 •
5. The terms and conditions of this Permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon
and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the
Permittee.
6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally
omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged
material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development
Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute
sufficient grounds to revoke a Permit.
Conditions of Approval:
Planning Division:
1. The project applicant shall prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog waste, which shall be
submitted to the Environmental Health Department for approval in conjunction with their
review of the septic system. The project applicant shall implement any measures
recommended by the Environmental Health Department and Animal Control Division for
disposing of the dog waste.
2. The applicant shall provide for percolation and other tests deemed necessary by, and to
the satisfaction of, the Department of Environmental Health for the septic system
proposed on-site. All feasible measures recommended by the Department of
Environmental Health to reduce potential impacts associated with the septic system shall
be implemented. The Department of Environmental Health will also assess the
applicant's plans regarding outdoor dog waste to ensure that the project will not
significantly degrade water quality. Any feasible measures recommended by the
Department of Environmental Health to reduce water quality impacts shall be
implemented by the project applicant.
3. As a condition of the approval of the Use Permit, the applicant is required to prepare and
submit four sets of construction plans and make an application for a Building Permit.
Construction shall comply with federal, State, and local regulations. Plans shall be
prepared, sealed and signed by a California Licensed Architect or Registered Engineer
for non-residential buildings and certain residential buildings. The following conditions
shall be placed on the building plans:
• Identify the usable sewage disposal area proved to meet the requirements of the
County Improvement Standards Appendix VII.
• Place a note on the map that states that no water well may be placed within 100 feet
of the Usable Sewage Disposal Area.
4. Proposed improvements shall comply with Title 24 energy conservation regulations.
Appropriate compliance forms (two sets) shall be submitted indicating compliance with
those standards.
5. Development fees for the proposed residential or non-residential improvements shall be
paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
0 •
14. Applicant must also comply, with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances,
and regulations.
Building Division
15. Building permits are required for the kennel building. Applicant must provide plans and
calculations prepared, sealed, and signed by a California licensed architect or registered
engineer verifying adequacy of building for proposed use. Design shall be in compliance
with the 1998 California Building Codes.
Environmental Health Department
16. Obtain a permit to operate a kennel from Butte County Health Department, Animal
Control Division
17. Under County permits, establish new septic collection and disposal system and make
other improvements or changes in operational plans necessary to dispose of the dog waste
as determined through Environmental Health Department review.
18. The kennel permit required by the applicant to establish the kennel use shall be obtained
from the Animal Control Division within 30 days of the issuance of the Use Permit. All
conditions required by the Animal Control Division shall be implemented prior to
issuance of the kennel permit.
19. The Use Permit is limited to a maximum of 8 dogs. The 12 dogs that are kept by the
applicant at the time of the approval of the Use Permit are allowed, and are required to be
registered with the Animal Control Division. The existing 12 dogs are allowed until they
are reduced in number by attrition. The applicant is required to prepare records of the 12
dogs' name, age, sex, and breed; provide the Animal Control Division with these records;
and notify the Animal Control Division when any of the dogs die.
20. The Animal Control Division shall inspect the kennel quarterly for the first year of
issuance of the Use Permit, and annually thereafter. Any recommendations made by the
Animal Control Division to address environmental, planning, nuisance, safety, or sanitary
conditions at the subject site shall be implemented and financed by the applicant. Should
measures fail to be implemented, the Use Permit shall be referred to the Planning
Commission for findings necessary for revocation of the Use Permit.
NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and
Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other
requirements.
Butte County Planning Commission Chairman
CC: Land Development Division
Building Division
Environmental Health Department
Assessor
Richardson, Lynn
From: Meleka, M.A.
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Richardson, Lynn
Subject: FW: Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration 3011 C raig Ave., Oroville, CA
95966 APN# 027-270-034
-----Original Message -----
From: HUTTS,GLORIA (HP-Roseville,exl) [mailto:gloria_hutts@hp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:37 PM
To: 'mmeleka@buttecounty.net'
Subject: Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration 3011
C raig Ave., Oroville, CA 95966 APN# 027-270-034
Butte County Planning Commission:
This letter is in response to a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated
Negative Declaration/Use Permit for Mr. Vannucci, located at 3011 Craig
Ave., to construct a dog kennel for up to twelve (12) dogs.
Noise:
My property, 3003 Craig Ave., is the property referred to in the report,
dated March 29, 2002, as being 400 feet from the proposed site for the dog
kennel and the report indicates that the noise impact to me would be .
insignificant. On the contrary, the noise impact to me is very significant.
Until a complaint was made about Mr. Vannucci's dogs that he kept on the
property, until several months ago, Mr. Vannucci's dogs barked almost all
night long and kept me awake. My bedroom window is North facing and the
sound carries very audibly, to the point that I can hear people talking from
Mr. Vannucci's property.
I would request that the proposed kennel be put on the far North side of Mr.
Vannucci's property, rather than next to Craig Ave. to help mitigate the
noise impact.
Septic:
It is not clear from the report how the septic will be handled; expansion of
existing septic, new septic? When is this determination made? Will the dogs
be kenneled all of the time? How will smell be treated to minimize
environmental impact?
Safety:
There are at least eight dogs around Mr. Vannucci's property now; some are
inside a fence, some are not. If I come near to the fence line on my
property, the dogs charge and bark. I certainly do not feel safe walking
down Craig Ave. How will the dogs be contained and not be a threat to
people?
Regards,
Gloria Hutts
Gloria Hutts
Global IT Procurement
eBusiness Solutions
Commodity Manager
916 748-0095 Tel
916 748-7011 Fax
gloria_hutts@hp.com
1
0
utte Count
L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530)538-7785
April 11, 2002
Robert J. Vannucci
3011 Craig Avenue
Oroville, CA 95966
Re: Use Permit, AP 027-270-034, UP 02-10
Mr. Vannucci:
Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Use Permit to allow for
a private (non-commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone to house owners personal dogs. Craig
Avenue, a private road off of Reservoir Road, a northerly extension of Ontario Road. Should you
have any concerns with the report or conditions of approval, please contact us in advance of the
meeting so that we may work together to resolve your concerns.
A public hearing has been set for April 25, 2002, at 9:30 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board
of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California.
The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be
present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact M. A. Meleka of this office at
538-7601, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
Lynn Richardson
Planning/Administrative
Support Service Assistant
Enc.
cc:
j:\wpdocs\pc1ts\schedu1e.mrg
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT - April 25, 2002
Applicant:
Robert Vannucci
Location:
3011 Craig Avenue (Craig
Avenue is a private road
accessible via Palermo Honcutt)
File #:
UP 02-10
Parcel Size:
10.4 acres
Request:
Use Permit to allow private
Zone date:
October 7, 1975
kenneling of more than five dogs
in a proposed kennel building.
G.P.:
Low -Density Residential
Project
Matthew Gerken/
Planner:
M. A. Meleka
Zoning:
A-5
Supervisor
District:
1
APN:
027-270-034
Attachments:
A. Conditions of Approval
B. Vicinity Map
C. General Plan/Zoning Map
STAFF COMMENT:
Staff recommends approval of the Use Permit with conditions, as specified below and in Exhibit
A.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Robert Vannucci is requesting a Use Permit to allow a private dog kennel on property with one
single-family dwelling and accessory structures. The Use Permit would allow the boarding of
Vannucci's personal dogs. A maximum of 12 dogs is anticipated, according to the project
applicant. The dogs would be kept in a proposed kennel building and surrounding fenced area. An
additional septic system on-site is proposed to handle waste from the dogs. Sanitary sewer service
for the house on-site is, and would continue to be, provided by a septic tank. Water is, and
would continue to be, obtained from wells on the site. Construction of the kennel building,
notwithstanding provisions of this Initial Study, will require a Building Permit, and the applicant
will be required to comply with any conditions associated with the Building Permit process. The
applicant would be required to obtain a sewage disposal permit for the additions to -the septic
system from the Environmental Health Department. The applicant would also require a kennel
permit from the Environmental Health Department's Animal Control Division for the kenneling
of more than five dogs — a permit that is contingent upon different criteria than are typically
considered for issuance Use Permits and other planning entitlements.
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT ■ APRIL 25, 2002 0 PAGE 1 0
The project is located in an area with low-density residential development, orchards, and
undeveloped land. A swale is located toward the center of the property, oriented east to west.
The property is mostly undeveloped grassland, used for grazing, but has one house and one barn.
Some trees and bushes line the swale and surround the home site. A man-made pond on the
property is fed with well water and appears to drain to the aforementioned swale. Two wells on-
site provide water supply to the home. Wastewater is disposed of though the use of a septic tank
and a leachfield area that extends to the north and northeast of the current residence.
The project site is surrounded by an orchard, low-density residential uses, and undeveloped
property. Zoning on all surrounding parcels is A-5 (Agricultural, parcels of more than five acres in
size). A dog kennel for the keeping of up to 12 dogs was approved approximately 1/4 mile to the
north of the subject property (UP 98-25).
ANALYSIS:
General Plan and Zoning:
The General Plan land use designation of the project site is Low -Density Residential.
The proposed project is located in an area zoned A-5 for agricultural use on parcels of 5 acres or
more in size. The proposal would establish a kennel (in a low-density residential and agricultural
area) which is permitted by issuance of a Use Permit. The nearest residential dwelling is located
at the eastern end of Craig Avenue, approximately 400 feet from the proposed project site. The
proposed project site is buffered not only by distance but also by trees between the proposed site
and the nearest residence. For the approval of the Use Permit, the applicant is required to present
information, including plans or other information that is sufficient to allow the Planning
Commission to make an informed decision. The Planning Commission may grant a Use Permit
if.
"The proposed uses of property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in
which the land lies, and that the use would not impair the integrity and character of the
zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible
with, or injurious to, surrounding properties or detrimental to the health and general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or the general health,
welfare, and safety of the residents of the county" (Butte County Code, Section 24-
45.10).
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
The project was reviewed for environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) in accordance with State Law. The following discussion summarizes those issues
and impacts identified in the Initial Study.
Air Quality
An increase in odor on-site is expected as a result of the keeping of approximately 12 dogs. The
nearest residential dwelling is approximately 400 feet from the proposed project site - a
significant enough distance to allow the odors to dissipate. The project applicant, however, has
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT ■ APRIL 25, 2002 ■ PAGE 2 0
•
not submitted any specific plan for dealing with the dog waste other than establishing an
additional septic system and leachfield. The project site is located in a predominantly
agricultural area with some very low-density residential development where the sensitivity to
such odors is relatively less than would be the case in a residential neighborhood, park,
commercial district, or other sensitive use. A mitigation measure requiring review of the
procedures for dealing with dog waste by the Environmental Health Department is included as a
condition to the issuance of this Use Permit.
Hydrology/Water Quality
The proposed project proposes an additional septic system to accommodate the kenneling of
dogs on-site. The project applicant indicates that water service to the site is from a well and that
this service will continue. As a condition to the issuance of the Use Permit, the County
Environmental Health Department will review the proposed project and determine whether or
not the project site has adequate soils to ensure proper function of the proposed septic system, a
system which will be required to comply with the County Improvement Standards. The
Environmental Health Department will also review the proposed project for potential well water
quality impacts.
Noise
The project would create additional noise in the area by allowing the keeping of approximately
12 dogs. The dogs would generate some amount of noise, especially when people or cars
approach the project site. The actual level of noise depends on the size and breed of the dogs,
the number of dogs, and the degree to which they are agitated. Typical noise levels associated
with agitated dogs range from 75 to 85 decibels for seven dogs at 50 feet (Bollard, personal
correspondence). The nearest residential dwelling to the proposed project site is located
approximately 400 feet to the east and is buffered by trees. Another residence is located
approximately 600 feet to the west. Since distance from a source of noise has an attenuating
effect — for every doubling of distance the level of sound decreases by approximately six
decibels — noise levels at nearby homes from barking dogs can be expected to range from 55 to
70 decibels when the dogs are agitated. The 24-hour equivalent noise level associated with the
dogs depends on the frequency by which they are disturbed, the time of day at which they are
agitated, and their temperament. If kept inside the kennel building, the sound of the dogs'
barking may not be perceptible to people in neighboring buildings.
Given the agricultural zoning and the character of the area, the sensitivity to noise impacts in this
area is relatively lower than other more populated parts of the county. A mitigation measure is
included in the Initial Study and as a condition to the issuance of a Use Permit, which addresses
any noise -related impact. With this condition, if the Department of Development Services or
other County departments receive noise -related complaints regarding the project and the level of
noise is in excess of established standards, the applicant would be required to implement
recommendations of the Department of Development Services to reduce the noise impacts. If
noise levels in the area are excessive, the Planning Commission will consider revocation of the
Use Permit.
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT ■ APRIL 25, 2002 0 PAGE 3 ■
•
ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions:
I. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings:
A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act,. Said study identified significant environmental effects and included
mitigation measures that would mitigate such effects below significant levels;. a
Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed.
B. The Development Review Committee has considered the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review
process.
C. On the basis of the whole record before the Development Review Committee,
including the Initial Study and any comments received, there is no substantial
evidence that the Use Permit for Robert Vannucci, Planning Division File No. UP
02-10, will have a significant effect on the environment.
D. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment
and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency.
E. This project will not have an impact to fish and/or wildlife habitat pursuant to
Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5.
H. Approve Use Permit 02-10. for Robert Vannucci, subject to the following findings and the
conditions in Exhibit "A":
A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed
use are in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone
in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development
policies and standards of the County because:
Conditions of approval have been applied to this project after CEQA review. The
project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and
the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Low Density
Residential. The Low Density Residential land use designation allows animal
husbandry as a Secondary Use. The A -S zone allows kennels with approval of a
Use Permit.
B. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use would
be compatible with, and would not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent
uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration
given to:
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 APRIL 25, 2002 0 PAGE 4 ■
1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density:
The proposed project will involve minor improvements to the property
including a septic system to handle the dog waste that will be required to
comply with County Improvement Standards and a kennel building that
will be required to comply with Uniform Building Code requirements.
Otherwise, no changes to buildings or density are proposed.
2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities:
No additional services are needed to accommodate this project.
3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character:
The nearest residential dwelling is located at the eastern end of Craig
Avenue, approximately 400 feet from the proposed project site. The
proposed project site is buffered not only by distance but also by trees
between the proposed site and the nearest residence. Various
domesticated animals are being kept at nearby properties, and as such the
proposal would not necessarily adversely affect neighborhood character
as long as the conditions specified in the Initial Study and in Exhibit A are
followed.
5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or proposed
development:
The site is suited for the project because the property is located in a
predominantly agricultural area with some very low-density residential
development and because the proposed use is allowed with the issuance of
a Use Permit.
6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use:
The Planning Division has circulated the proposed kennel application to
County agencies and has received responses that indicated there is no
evidence that the use, with appropriate conditions, would cause any other
relevant planning -related impact. The project would require a kennel
permit from the Animal Control Division of the Environmental Health
Department. The findings and criteria for this type of permit are different
than the findings and criteria for the Use Permit. If this Use Permit is
approved, its approval does not preclude the Animal Control Division
from denying the kennel permit. The planning -related impacts of this
project appear to be minor in general, assuming all conditions are
dutifully executed.
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 APRIL 25, 2002 ■ PAGE 5 0
•
C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating
characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be
operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT ■ APRIL 25, 2002 0 PAGE 6 0
0
EXHIBIT A
USE PERMIT
E
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.)
UP 02-10
PERMIT NO.
027-270-034
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special
conditions set forth below. Robert Vannucci is hereby granted a Use Permit to establish a private
dog kennel for boarding of more than five dogs on APN 027-270-034 on Craig Avenue, subject
to the following conditions:
1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of
application and issuance of Permit constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance,
including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65.
2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Use Permit, all conditions
must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use.
The use granted by this permit must be established within two years of the date of
approval.
3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development
Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written
request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification
shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the
application, fees paid, and environmental determination as conditionally approved.
Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for
amendment.
4. If any use for which a Use Permit has been granted is not established within two years of
the receipt of the Permit by the Permittee, the Permit shall become null and void and
reapplication pursuant to Section 24-45 (of the Zoning Code) shall be required to
establish the use previously granted under the expired Permit unless, 30 days prior to the
expiration date, a request for a one-year extension is submitted to the Planning
Commission together with sufficient evidence that the time limits for processing
development permits under federal or State regulations require time limits which exceed
one year. Upon application, and for good cause by the Permittee, at a public hearing
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT 0 APRIL 25, 2002 0 PAGE 7 0
pursuant to Section 24-45.25 above, the Planning Commission may extend any time
limitation previously made a part of any condition to a Use Permit.
5. The terms and conditions of this Permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon
and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the
Permittee.
6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally
omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged
material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development
Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute
sufficient grounds to revoke a Permit.
Conditions of Approval:
Planning Division:
1. The project applicant shall prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog waste, which shall be
submitted to the Environmental Health Department for approval in conjunction with their
review of the septic system. The project applicant shall implement any measures
recommended by the Environmental Health Department and Animal Control Division for
disposing of the dog waste. (Mitigation Measure)
2. The applicant shall provide for percolation and other tests deemed necessary by, and to
the satisfaction of, the Department of Environmental Health for the septic system
proposed on-site. All feasible measures recommended by the Department of
Environmental Health to reduce potential impacts associated with the septic system shall
be implemented. The Department of Environmental Health will also assess the
applicant's plans regarding outdoor dog waste to ensure that the project will not
significantly degrade water quality. Any feasible measures recommended by the
Department of Environmental Health to reduce water quality impacts shall be
implemented by the project applicant. (Mitigation Measure)
3. As a condition of the approval of the Use Permit, the applicant is required to prepare and
submit four sets of construction plans and make an application for a Building Permit.
Construction shall comply with federal, State, and local regulations. Plans shall be
prepared, sealed and signed by a California Licensed Architect or Registered Engineer
for non-residential buildings and certain residential buildings. The following conditions
shall be placed on the building plans:
• Identify the usable sewage disposal area proved to meet the requirements of the
County Improvement Standards Appendix VII.
• Place a note on the map that states that no water well may be placed within 100 feet
of the Usable Sewage Disposal Area. (Mitigation Measure)
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT 0 APRIL 25, 2002 ■ PAGE 8 0
0 0
4. Proposed improvements shall comply with Title 24 energy conservation regulations.
Appropriate compliance forms (two sets) shall. be submitted indicating compliance with
those standards.
5. Development fees for the proposed residential or non-residential improvements shall be
paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
6. The applicant must comply with Uniform Building Code requirements for property line
clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistiveness of existing buildings.
7. If the Department of Development Services or other County departments receive noise -
related complaints regarding the project and the level of noise is in excess of established
standards, the applicant shall implement recommendations of the Department of
Development Services to reduce the noise impacts. Such recommendations may include,
but are not limited to, keeping the dogs inside the kennel building at noise -sensitive times
of the day, building noise attenuation devices that provide some relief to nearby homes,
installation of doors or sound insulation in the kennel building, limiting the applicant to a
particular number or size of dogs based on noise levels, or other recommendations. Any
recommended actions to reduce noise would be subject to Building Permit and other
applicable conditions. (Mitigation Measure)
8. The installation of the kennel building shall comply with all applicable building and
electrical codes.
9. All facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six months shall be considered
abandoned. Abandoned facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public
nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services
determines that the facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to return the site
to its original condition within 30 calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If the site is
not returned to its original condition within 30 days, the County may do so at the
applicant's and/or land owner's joint expense.
10. The facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the
unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from
the County.
11. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field
inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met.
12. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances,
and regulations.
Building Division
13. Building permits are required for the kennel building. Applicant must provide plans and
calculations prepared, sealed, and signed by a California licensed architect or registered
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 APRIL 25, 2002 0 PAGE 9 0
•
engineer verifying adequacy of building for proposed use. Design shall be in compliance
with the 1998 California Building Codes.
Environmental Health Department
14. Obtain a permit to operate a kennel from Butte County Health Department, Animal
Control Division
15. Under County permits, establish new septic collection and disposal system and make
other improvements or changes in operational plans necessary to dispose of the dog waste
as determined through Environmental Health Department review.
I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that
they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that
I agree to abide fully by said conditions.
Dated:
Applicant
NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and
Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other
requirements.
Butte County Planning Commission Chairman
CC: Land Development Division
Building Division
Environmental Health Department
Assessor
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT ■ APRIL 25, 2002 ■ PAGE 10 ■
t
„r
Louis ve
•i
CD
Q'
�
A-5
IL
Daly Ave
Louis �0 1
-,4
irx'
A-5
7F):
---- Bledsoe Ct
----- Project Location ==a
------ -----------------
10.10 s
5.20
10.26
11.386
!�
0
' A ------- -- - -- --- -
--
,-,-�
------ 15.13 !
-------------Cra-
---------- -----
-_
------ a'
�.
43.58
,
A-5 b- Ontat'o
ve
Almy Ave
_
y
--------------------- ---------------
_ --
------------
1
rr
'
OT
= i
Mc Intosh Av ; ',
---- ------
---------
, A�
--------- ---------- ;- ----------
------------
CD
1�
-
700 0 700
1400 2100 2800 3500 4200 4900
5600 Feet
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING C0MIlVIISSION
N
SupervisorialDistrict
Applicant: Robert Vannucci
Owner: Same
Hearing Date: April 25, 2002 @ 9:30 a.m.
Existing Zone: A-5 (Agricultural, 5 acre minimum)
Request: Use Permit to allow a private (non-commercial) dog kennel.
# 1
Assessor Parcel No: 027-270-034
Me: UP 02-10
MEW
- \_1 _LAND OF NAT;,; RAL W E A L T H AND BEAUTY
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
March 29, 2002 FAX: (530) 538-7785
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AND
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a.public hearing will be
held on April 25, 2002, at 9:30 A.M. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room County
Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, at 9:30 a.m. regarding the
following item
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been
prepared for the following project:
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/USE PERINIIT
Robert Vannucci, Use Permit to allow a private dog kennel on property with one single-family
dwelling and accessory structures. The Use Permit would allow the boarding of Vanucci's personal
dogs. A maximum of 12 dogs is anticipated, according to the project applicant. The dogs would be
kept in a proposed kennel building and surrounding fenced area. An additional septic'system on-
site is proposed to handle waste from the dogs. Sanitary sewer service for the house on-site is, and
would continue to be, provided by a septic tank. Water is, and would continue to be, obtained
from wells on the site. Construction of the kennel building, notwithstanding provisions of this
Initial Study, will require a Building Permit, and the applicant will be required to comply with
any conditions associated with the Building Permit process. The applicant would be required to
obtain a sewage disposal permit for the additions to the septic system from the Environmental
Health Department. The property is zoned A-5 (Agricultural, 5 -acre parcels) and is located at
3011 Craig Avenue (Craig Avenue is a private road accessible via Palermo Honcutt), Oroville
area. APN# 027-270-034 (CS) (UP 02-10)
The initial study for the project identifies potentially significant effects, but revisions in the
project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. Therefore,
Planning Division staff is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
f ;co? .
CAN CE . GRUBBY, BUT )E CO. CLERK
DEPUTY
Cr •
i
The Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project are on file
for public review starting, April 5, 2002, through April 24, 2002, at the Butte County Planning
Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. All interested persons are invited to
review the document. Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above
address.
If you challenge either the Mitigated Negative Declaration or the Use Permit in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described
in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the
public hearing.
For further information regarding this project, please contact Craig Sanders, project planner, at
the Butte County Planning Division at (530) 538-7603.
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION
FRED DAVIS, INTERIM DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
To be published in the Oroville Mercury on Friday, April 5, 2002.
•
C
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
BUTTE COUNTY
INITIAL STUDY AND
PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FOR
UP 02-10 (Robert Vannucci)
Project Name: Private Dog Kenn*bert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 •
COUNTY OF BUTTE
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
FOR
USE PERMIT 02-10 (Robert Vanucci)
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
A. Applicant/Owner: Robert Vannucci
B. Staff Contact: Matthew Gerken/M. A. Meleka, (530) 538-6572
C. Project Name: N/A
D. Project Location: 3011 Craig Avenue (Craig Avenue is a private road accessible via Palermo Honcutt)
E. Tvpe of Application(s): Use Permit
F. Assessor's Parcel Number: 027-270-034
G. Proiect Site Size: 10.4 acres
H. Current Zonina: A-5
I. General Plan Designation: Low -Density Residential
J. Environmental Setting: The project is located in an area with low-density residential development,
orchards, and undeveloped land. A swale is located toward the center of the property, oriented east to west.
The property is mostly undeveloped grassland, used for grazing, but has one house and one barn. Some
trees and bushes line the swale and surround the home site. A man-made pond on the property is fed with
well water and appears to drain to the aforementioned swale. Two wells on-site provide water supply to the
home. Wastewater is disposed though the use of a septic tank and a leachfield area that extends to the north
and northeast of the current home site.
K. Surrounding Land Uses: The project site is surrounded by an orchard, low-density residential uses, and
undeveloped property. Zoning on all surrounding parcels is A-5 (Agricultural, parcels of more than five acres
in area). A dog kennel for the keeping of up to 12 dogs was approved approximately ''A mile to the north of the
subject property (UP 98-25).
L. Project Description: Robert Vannucci is requesting a Use Pemut to allow a private dog kennel on property
with one single-family dwelling and accessory structures. - The Use Permit would allow the boarding of
Vanucci's personal dogs. A maximum of 12 dogs is anticipated, according to the project applicant. The dogs
would be kept in a proposed kennel building and surrounding fenced area. An additional septic system on-site
is proposed to handle waste from the dogs. Sanitary sewer service for the house on-site is, and would
continue to be, provided by a septic tank. Water is, and would continue to be, obtained from wells on the
site. Construction of the kennel building, notwithstanding provisions of this Initial Study, will require a
Building Permit, and the applicant will be required to comply with any conditions associated with the
Building Permit process. The applicant would be required to obtain a sewage disposal permit for the
additions to the septic system from the Environmental Health Department.
M. Public Aaency Approvals: Butte County Development Services Department, Butte County Environmental
Health Department, Butte County Public Works Department, Butte County Fire Department, and Butte
County Air Quality Management District.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 1 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kennoobert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 •
2.0 DETERNUNATION
[ J I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[XJ I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will
NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions have been made by or agreed to by the project
proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[ J I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
[ ] I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an
earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
[ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed
upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Prepared by:
Cotton/Bridges/Associates
Reviewed by: M. A./Meleka, Principal Planner
Date
!�Z8i°Z
Date
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 2 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kennobert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10
3.0 POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS CHECKLIST SETTING
A. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected:
The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact
that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
[ J 4.1 Aesthetics [ ] 4.2 Agriculture Resources [X] 4.3 Air Quality
[ ] 4.4 Biological Resources [ ] 4.5 Cultural Resources [ ] 4.6 Geologic Processes
[ ] 4.7 Hazards/Hazardous Material [X] 4.8 Hydrology/Water Quality [ ] 4.9 Land Use
[ ] 4.10 Mineral Resources [X] 4.11 Noise [ ] 4.12 Housing
[ ] 4.13 Public Services [ ] 4.14 Recreation [ ] 4.15 Transportation/Traffic
[ ] 4.16 Utilities/Service Systems [X] 4.17 Mandatory Findings of Significance
B. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact' answers that are adequately supported
by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact'
answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not
apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact"
answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards, (e.g.,
the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on a project -specific screening analysis.)
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative
as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or
less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an
effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the
determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less
Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how
they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier
Analyses," may be cross-referenced).
5) "Reviewed Under Previous Document." Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering,
program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative
declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis.
C) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the
earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 3 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kenn0obert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 •
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for
potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside
document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is
substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals
contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant.
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
4.1 AESTHETIGVISUAL RESOURCES:
Impact Discussion:
The project would allow the boarding of approximately 12 dogs in an area surrounded by low-density residential
properties, some of which involve small-scale animal husbandry, and an orchard. The proposed kennel site is
screened from the home to the southeast by trees. No substantial additional lighting is anticipated as a part of the
project. Any buildings constructed will comply with provisions of the Zoning Code and conditions of a Building
Permit. Considering the existing uses that surround the proposed project building site, no substantial conflicts with
the established character or function of the area are anticipated. This project would not significantly impact a scenic
vista. Potential noise impacts will be addressed in the Noise section of this Initial Study. The impact is considered
less than significant.
Mitieation Measures: None required.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 4 ■
Less Than
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Significant
with
Less Than
Significant
Under
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
act
Previous
Incorporated
Document
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
X
b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
X
buildings within a state scenic highway?
c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
X
d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare
which would adversely affect day or nighttime views
X
in the area?
Impact Discussion:
The project would allow the boarding of approximately 12 dogs in an area surrounded by low-density residential
properties, some of which involve small-scale animal husbandry, and an orchard. The proposed kennel site is
screened from the home to the southeast by trees. No substantial additional lighting is anticipated as a part of the
project. Any buildings constructed will comply with provisions of the Zoning Code and conditions of a Building
Permit. Considering the existing uses that surround the proposed project building site, no substantial conflicts with
the established character or function of the area are anticipated. This project would not significantly impact a scenic
vista. Potential noise impacts will be addressed in the Noise section of this Initial Study. The impact is considered
less than significant.
Mitieation Measures: None required.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 4 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kenne0bert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 •
4.2 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:
Impact Discussion:
The project does not propose to convert any farmland to non-agricultural use.
Mitigation Measure: None required
4.3 AIR QUALITY:
Potentially
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
Significant
with
Significant
No
Under
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
Previous
Incorporated
Document
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
X
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
X
X
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or
a Williamson Act Contract?
X
X
C. Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
X
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
Impact Discussion:
The project does not propose to convert any farmland to non-agricultural use.
Mitigation Measure: None required
4.3 AIR QUALITY:
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 5 ■
Potentially
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
Significant
with
Significant
No
Under
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
Previous
Incorporated
Document.
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
X
b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
X
violation?
c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
X
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
X
e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people?
X
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 5 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kenn0obert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 Is
Impact Discussion:
Both the California Air Resources Board and the Environmental Protection Agency have established air pollution
standards in an effort to protect human health and welfare. Geographic areas are designated "attainment' if these
standards are met and "nonattainment' if they are not met. In addition, each agency has several levels of
classifications based on severity of the problem Butte County and all northern Sacramento Valley Air Districts
have been designated as "moderate" nonattainment areas for the state standards for ozone and fine particulate matter
(PMto). Currently, Butte County is in attainment for all the federal (less stringent) air quality standards.
The project may create fugitive dust, oxides of nitrogen, and reactive organic gases emissions during construction of
the kennel. Fugitive dust emission occurs during site development activities such as grading, excavation for
foundations and utilities, road construction, and other soil work. Exhaust emissions are also possible if equipment is
used on-site. Since construction of the kennel building is expected to require few pieces of equipment, the impacts
from exhaust emission is expected to be less than significant.
An increase in odor on-site is expected as a result of the keeping approximately 12 dogs. The nearest residential
dwelling is approximately 400 feet from the proposed project site - a significant enough distance to allow the odors
to dissipate. The project applicant, however, has not submitted any specific plan for dealing with the dog waste
other than establishing an additional septic system and leachfield. The project site is located in an agricultural area
where the sensitivity to such odors is relatively less than would be the case in a residential neighborhood, park,
commercial district, or other sensitive use. With the implementation of the mitigation measure included below, the
impact would be less than significant.
Mitization Measure #1:
The project applicant shall prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog waste, which shall be submitted to the
Environmental Health Department for approval in conjunction with their review of the septic system The project
applicant shall implement any measures recommended by the Environmental Health Department'.and Animal Control
Division for disposing of the dog waste.
Timing: Plans for disposal and recommendations of the Environmental Health Department and Animal Control
Division shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel.
Monitoring: Building inspectors shall spot check for aspects of the plan that involve improvements to the property.
The Animal Control Division shall respond to complaints dealing with odors.
4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES:
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 6 ■
Potentially
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
Significant
with
Significant
No
Impact
Under
Previous
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Document
Incorporated
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species . local or regional plans, policies, or
X
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies, and
X
regulations or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 6 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Ken*obert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 0
Impact Discussion:
The project site consists mostly of grassland, with a few trees near the home site and the on-site swale. No impact
on significant biological resources is expected because the project consists of the construction of a very small
building and the private kenneling of dogs.
A drainage swale crosses the center of the project property. The project, as proposed, is not expected to have any
impact on this water feature or whatever wildlife it may support. The proposed septic system addition will be
reviewed by the Department of Environmental Health to ensure its sustainability. Any potential impacts on the
drainage swale will be mitigated by measures included in the Hydrology and Water Quality section pertaining to the
proposed septic system addition.
The project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources.
The proposal would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.
Mitigation Measure: None Required
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 7 ■
Potentially
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
No
Reviewed
Under
Would the proposal:
Significant
with
Significant
Impact
Previous
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Document
Incorporated
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 or the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh,
X
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interni tion, or other means)?
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish and wildlife species
or with established native resident or migratory
X
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife
nursery sites?
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources such as a tree
X
reservation policy ordinance?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
X
conservationplan? .
g. A reduction in the numbers, a restriction in the range,
or an impact to the critical habitat of any unique, rare,
X
threatened, or endangered species of animals?
h. A reduction in the diversity or numbers of animals
onsite (including mammals, birds, reptiles,.
X
amphibians,.. fish or invertebrates)?
i. A deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat (for
foraging, breeding, roosting, nesting, etc.)?
X
j. Introduction of barriers to movement of any resident
or migratory fish or wildlife species?
X
k. Introduction of any factors (light, fencing, noise,
human presence and/or domestic animals) which could
X
hinder the normal activities of wildlife?
Impact Discussion:
The project site consists mostly of grassland, with a few trees near the home site and the on-site swale. No impact
on significant biological resources is expected because the project consists of the construction of a very small
building and the private kenneling of dogs.
A drainage swale crosses the center of the project property. The project, as proposed, is not expected to have any
impact on this water feature or whatever wildlife it may support. The proposed septic system addition will be
reviewed by the Department of Environmental Health to ensure its sustainability. Any potential impacts on the
drainage swale will be mitigated by measures included in the Hydrology and Water Quality section pertaining to the
proposed septic system addition.
The project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources.
The proposal would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.
Mitigation Measure: None Required
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 7 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kennel0bert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 0
4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES:
Impact Discussion:
Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic period archaeological sites; historical features, such as rock walls,
water ditches and flumes, and cemeteries; and architectural features. Cultural resources consist of any human -made
site, object (i.e., artifact), or feature that defines and illuminates our past. Prehistoric resources sites are found in
foothill areas, areas with high bluffs, rock outcroppings, areas overlooking deer migratory corridors, or above bodies
of water. No cultural resources structures or sites of any type are known to be located on the subject site.
Construction of a private kennel building would not require excavation, and use of the property for kennel purposes
would not require excavation. Because of the location and the nature of the project, the potential for uncovering or
otherwise disturbing cultural resources as a result of project -related activities is unlikely.
Mitigation Measures: None required.
4.6 GEOLOGIC PROCESSES:
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Significant
with
Less Than
Significant
No
Under
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
Previous
death involving:
Incorporated
Document
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
X
of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5?
X
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
X
c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
X
d. Disturb any human remains, vicluding those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
X
Impact Discussion:
Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic period archaeological sites; historical features, such as rock walls,
water ditches and flumes, and cemeteries; and architectural features. Cultural resources consist of any human -made
site, object (i.e., artifact), or feature that defines and illuminates our past. Prehistoric resources sites are found in
foothill areas, areas with high bluffs, rock outcroppings, areas overlooking deer migratory corridors, or above bodies
of water. No cultural resources structures or sites of any type are known to be located on the subject site.
Construction of a private kennel building would not require excavation, and use of the property for kennel purposes
would not require excavation. Because of the location and the nature of the project, the potential for uncovering or
otherwise disturbing cultural resources as a result of project -related activities is unlikely.
Mitigation Measures: None required.
4.6 GEOLOGIC PROCESSES:
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Reviewed
Under
Previous
Document
a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
X
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
2. Strong seismic ground shaking?
X
3. Seismic -related ground failure, including
X
liquefaction?
4. Landslides?
X
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of to soil?
X
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 8 ■
Project Name: Private Dog KennObert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 0
Impact Discussion:
The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate
Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake fault zone or an aftershock
zone. The only known active fault in Butte County is the Cleveland Hill fault, located approximately 25 miles from
the project site, where activity on August 1, 1975 resulted in the Oroville earthquake. This earthquake had a Richter
magnitude of 5.7 and resulted in approximately 2.2 miles of ground rupture along the western flank of Cleveland
Hill. In the northwest corner of Butte County near Chico there are a series of short, north-northwest trending faults
similar to the Cleveland Hill fault. These faults appear to be an extension of the Bear Mountain Fault or Foothills
Shear Zone. Minor seismic activity has occurred in the area of these short faults; however, other geologic evidence
indicates these faults are not active (Butte County General Plan 1.977). The Butte County GIS Fault Lines theme
shows that inferred faults are located approximately 1,300 feet to the west, and approximately 2,000 feet to the east
of the proposed project site. No impacts are anticipated since no rupture of a known active earthquake fault exists in
the project area.
The 80 -mile -long Midland-Sweitzer fault is located approximately 50 miles southwest of the project site. This fault
is considered active and has caused historic earthquakes of Richter magnitudes between 6 to 6.9 in the area in 1892.
There is some speculation as to the exact location of the historic earthquake epicenters and some question if they
actually occurred on the Midland-Sweitzer fault (Butte County, 1977).
Approximately five miles west of Butte County there is a north trending fault system known as the Willows fault.
This fault is approximately 40 miles long and displaces Cretaceous sediment in the Sacramento Valley. It does not
appear to displace surface sediment and has been mapped principally by geophysical methods. However, there have
been enough historical seismic events in the vicinity of this fault to conclude that it should be considered potentially
active (Butte County General Plan 1977).
A moderate earthquake occurred on the afternoon of Friday, August 10, 2001, centered about nine miles west of
Portola, California, and about 50 miles east of the project site. Very little damage occurred as a result of this
earthquake, which was had a magnitude of 5.5, but brief groundshaking was felt in Chico during the earthquake and
the aftershocks. This earthquake occurred in the Mohawk Valley Fault Zone, and this area of California experiences
a magnitude five or higher earthquake approximately every 20 years, according to the University of California,
Berkeley Seismological Laboratory. Historical events in the area include the following:
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 9 ■
Potentially
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
Significant
with
Significant
No
Under
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
Previous
Incorporated
Document
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
X
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-
B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
X
substantial risks to life or property?
e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use
of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal
system where sewers are not available for the disposal
X
or wastewater?
Impact Discussion:
The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate
Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake fault zone or an aftershock
zone. The only known active fault in Butte County is the Cleveland Hill fault, located approximately 25 miles from
the project site, where activity on August 1, 1975 resulted in the Oroville earthquake. This earthquake had a Richter
magnitude of 5.7 and resulted in approximately 2.2 miles of ground rupture along the western flank of Cleveland
Hill. In the northwest corner of Butte County near Chico there are a series of short, north-northwest trending faults
similar to the Cleveland Hill fault. These faults appear to be an extension of the Bear Mountain Fault or Foothills
Shear Zone. Minor seismic activity has occurred in the area of these short faults; however, other geologic evidence
indicates these faults are not active (Butte County General Plan 1.977). The Butte County GIS Fault Lines theme
shows that inferred faults are located approximately 1,300 feet to the west, and approximately 2,000 feet to the east
of the proposed project site. No impacts are anticipated since no rupture of a known active earthquake fault exists in
the project area.
The 80 -mile -long Midland-Sweitzer fault is located approximately 50 miles southwest of the project site. This fault
is considered active and has caused historic earthquakes of Richter magnitudes between 6 to 6.9 in the area in 1892.
There is some speculation as to the exact location of the historic earthquake epicenters and some question if they
actually occurred on the Midland-Sweitzer fault (Butte County, 1977).
Approximately five miles west of Butte County there is a north trending fault system known as the Willows fault.
This fault is approximately 40 miles long and displaces Cretaceous sediment in the Sacramento Valley. It does not
appear to displace surface sediment and has been mapped principally by geophysical methods. However, there have
been enough historical seismic events in the vicinity of this fault to conclude that it should be considered potentially
active (Butte County General Plan 1977).
A moderate earthquake occurred on the afternoon of Friday, August 10, 2001, centered about nine miles west of
Portola, California, and about 50 miles east of the project site. Very little damage occurred as a result of this
earthquake, which was had a magnitude of 5.5, but brief groundshaking was felt in Chico during the earthquake and
the aftershocks. This earthquake occurred in the Mohawk Valley Fault Zone, and this area of California experiences
a magnitude five or higher earthquake approximately every 20 years, according to the University of California,
Berkeley Seismological Laboratory. Historical events in the area include the following:
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 9 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kenn 11 Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 •
Table 1
Historical Seismic Events near Recent Portola Event Near Portola — Mohawk Valley Fault Zone
Year
Magnitude
Location
1875
6.2
40 km to the NNE near Janesville
1888
6.2
20 km to the SSW near Blairsden
1959
5.6
40 km to the ESE near Verdi
1966
6.0
60 km to the SSE near Truckee
Source: Adapted from information provided by the California Division of Mines and Geology and posted on the UC -
Berkeley Seismological Laboratory web site (http://www.seismo.berkeley.edu/Seismo).
Like most of central California, the site can be expected to be subjected to seismic ground shaking at some future
time. Accordingly, all buildings and other improvements will be designed and installed in accordance with Uniform
Building Code requirements. Because the project appears to be located such that the probability of significant
groundshaking is low, because the project does not propose the addition of significant structures that would be at
risk to seismic activity, and because any structures that are built during the course of the project will be designed and
installed in accordance with Uniform Building Code standards for the appropriate Seismic Hazard Zone, potential
geologic impacts would be less than significant.
The Butte County Seismic Safety Element's Liquefaction Potential Map indicates that the site has a generally low
potential for liquefaction. The impact would be less than significant.
The Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that
there is low to moderate potential for landslides in this area. The project involves only the use of property for
private kenneling. The project would involve building a small kennel building, which would comply with
applicable portions of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by Butte County, which would mitigate any potential
impacts resulting from any sort of ground failure.
There is a moderate soil erosion potential for the project site, according to Butte County General Plan GIS data. The
project does not involve any activity that would result in significant soil erosion impacts.
The Conservation Element's Expansive Soils Map indicates that the project site has a high expansive soil potential.
The project involves only the use of property for private kenneling. The project would involve building a small
kennel building, which would comply with applicable portions of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by Butte
County, which would mitigate any potential impacts resulting from any sort of ground failure.
Since an expansion of the existing septic system is proposed as a part of the project, Mitigation Measure #2, below,
is required to reduce any potential impact.
Mifleation Measure # 2:
The applicant shall provide for percolation and other tests deemed necessary by, and to the satisfaction of, the
Department of Environmental Health for the septic system proposed on-site. All feasible measures recommended by the
Department of Environmental Health to reduce potential impacts associated with the septic system shall be implemented. -
The Department of Environmental Health will also assess the applicant's plans regarding outdoor dog waste to ensure
that the project will not significantly degrade water quality. Any feasible measures recommended by the Department of
Environmental Health to reduce impacts to water quality shall be implemented by the project applicant.
Timing: The building plans shall demonstrate the location of septic system components as recommended by the
Department of Environmental Health.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 10 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kennel,'izobert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10
Monitoring: The Department of Environmental Health shall spot check and shall ensure compliance on-site.
4.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS:
Impact Discussion:
The project site is not located on or near any sources of hazardous materials and would not create any hazardous
materials. No impact is anticipated.
The project site is not known to be listed on any hazardous materials sites lists.
The project site is not located within the 65 or 70 CNEL noise contour of any airport, nor is it located in any aircraft
overflight area, according to the Butte County General Plan.
0 Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 11 ■
Potentially
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
No
Reviewed
Under
Would the proposal:
p p
Significant
with
Significant
Impact
Previous
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Document
Incorporated
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environmental through the routine transport use, or
X
disposal of hazardous materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
X
materials into the environment?
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
X
quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools?
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to
Goverment Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
X
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or,. .
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two .
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
X
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
X
residing or working in the project area?
g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
X
evacuationplan?
h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
X
where residences are intermixed with willdlands?
Impact Discussion:
The project site is not located on or near any sources of hazardous materials and would not create any hazardous
materials. No impact is anticipated.
The project site is not known to be listed on any hazardous materials sites lists.
The project site is not located within the 65 or 70 CNEL noise contour of any airport, nor is it located in any aircraft
overflight area, according to the Butte County General Plan.
0 Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 11 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kenne4kert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 •
The California Department of Forestry has submitted conditions which are to be met before approval of the project
that would reduce any potential impact regarding fire. Compliance with these measures, which are included in the
development application materials, is to be accomplished in coordination with the Butte County Fire Department.
Mitieation Measures: None required.
4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY:
Impact Discussion:
The proposed project proposes an additional septic system to accommodate the kenneling of dogs on-site. The
project applicant indicates that water service to the site is from a well, and that this service will continue. The
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 12 ■
Potentially
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
No
Reviewed
Under
Would the proposal:
Significant
with
Significant
Impact
Previous
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Document
Incorporated
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
X
requirements?
b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production
X
rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level
which would not support existing land uses or planned
uses for which permits have been granted)?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the course
of a stream or river, in a manner which would:result:in
X
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of•the
site or area, including through the alteration of the course
of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or
X
amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result
in flooding on- or off-site?
e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed
the capacity of existing or plamied storm water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
X
polluted runoff?
f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
X
g Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as
mapped by Federal Flood Hazard Boundary, Flood
Insurance Rate Map, or other flood hazard delineation
X
map?
h. Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
X
i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss,
injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as
X
a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
X
Impact Discussion:
The proposed project proposes an additional septic system to accommodate the kenneling of dogs on-site. The
project applicant indicates that water service to the site is from a well, and that this service will continue. The
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 12 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kenn*bert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 •
County Environmental Health Department will review the proposed project and determine whether or not the project
site has adequate soils for the proposed septic system, as is required in Mitigation Measure #2 in section 4.6.
The project site is not located within a 1.00 -year flood zone or 500 -year flood zone as shown on Butte County GIS
maps, which are based on a Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map, dated June, 2000.
The property is not located in an area prone to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact would occur with respect to
these natural hazards.
An addition to the existing septic system is proposed on-site, and will be required to comply with the County
Improvement Standards.
Mitigation Measure # 3:
Place the following conditions on the building plans:
a Identify the usable sewage disposal area proved to meet the requirements of the County Improvement Standards
Appendix VII.
b Place a note on the building plans that states that no water well may be placed within 100 feet of the Usable
Sewage Disposal Area.
Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown or noted on building plans.
Timing: The building plans shall include required information and requirements of the condition shall be adhered
to during project construction.
Monitoring: The Planning Division and the Public Works Department shall ensure that the note is placed on the
building plans. Building inspectors shall spot check and shall ensure compliance on-site.
4.9 LAND USE:
Impact Discussion:
The proposal would establish a kennel in an agricultural area. It would not divide any established community.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 13 ■
Less Than
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Significant
with
Less Than
Significant
No
Under
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
Previous
Incorporated
Document
a. Physically divide an established community?
X
b. Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including, but not limited to, the general
plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
X
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation
plan or natural community conservationplan?
X
Impact Discussion:
The proposal would establish a kennel in an agricultural area. It would not divide any established community.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 13 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kenn01bert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 •
The proposed project is located in an area zoned A-5 for agricultural use on parcels of five acres or more in size.
The nearest residential dwelling is located at the eastern end of Craig Avenue, approximately 400 feet from the
proposed project site. The proposed project site is buffered not only by distance but also by trees between the
proposed site and the nearest residence. Kennels are a permitted use in this zone with the approval of a Use Permit.
For the approval of the Use Permit, the applicant is required to present information, including plans or other
information, that is substantial enough to make an informed decision. The Planning Commission reviews the
proposal and will grant a Use Permit if:
"the proposed uses of property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land
lies, and that the use would not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies, and
that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with, or injurious to, surrounding properties or
detrimental to the health and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or
the general health, welfare, and safety of the residents of the county' (Butte County Code, Section 24-
45.10).
This Initial Study, the review by the Planning Commission based on information from planning staff and the
applicant, and subsequent review of the project by the Department of Environmental Health will ensure compliance
with all land use plans and policies and ensure the proposed project would not impair the health, welfare, or safety
of Butte County residents.
The property is not within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact would be
incurred.
Mitigation Measure: None required
4.10 MINERAL RESOURCES:
Impact Discussion:
The proposed project would not use or extract any mineral or energy resources and would not restrict access to
known mineral resource areas.
Mitieation Measure: None required
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 14 ■
Less Than
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Significant
with
Less Than
Significant
No
Under
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
Previous
.
Incorporated
Document
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
X
residents of the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
X
general plan, specific plan, or other land useplan?
Impact Discussion:
The proposed project would not use or extract any mineral or energy resources and would not restrict access to
known mineral resource areas.
Mitieation Measure: None required
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 14 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kenne&ert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 •
4.11 NOISE:
Impact Discussion:
The project would create additional noise in the area by allowing the keeping of approximately 12 dogs. The dogs
would generate some amount of noise, especially when people or cars approach the project site. The actual level of
noise depends on the size of dogs, the number of dogs, and the degree to which they are agitated. Typical noise
levels associated with agitated dogs can range from 75 to 85 decibels for seven dogs at 50 feet (Bollard, personal
correspondence). The nearest residential dwelling to the proposed project site is located approximately 400 feet to
the east, and is buffered by trees. Another residence is located approximately 600 feet to the west. Since distance
from a source of noise has an attenuating effect — for every doubling of distance the level of sound decreases by
approximately six decibels — noise levels at nearby homes from barking dogs can be expected to range from 55 to 70
decibels when the dogs are agitated. The 24-hour equivalent noise level associated with the dogs depends on the
frequency by which they are disturbed, the time of day at which they are agitated, and their temperament. If kept
inside the kennel building, the sound of the dogs' barking may not be perceptible to people in neighboring buildings.
Given the agricultural zoning and character of the area, the sensitivity to noise impacts in this area is relatively lower
than other more populated parts of the county. The mitigation measure included below reduces any potential impact
to a less -than -significant level.
Some temporary increase in noise is expected as the site is prepared and construction occurs for the implementation
of the proposed project. Because of the character of the area, the distance to neighboring residential uses and
buildings, the temporary nature of such activities, the impact is less than significant.
The project is not located in the 65 or 70 CNEL airport noise contour, according to the Butte County General Plan.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 15 ■
Potentially
Less Than
significant
Less Than
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
significant
with
significant
No
Impact
Under
Previous
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Document
Incorporated
a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
X
agencies?
b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
ground bome vibration or ground bome noise levels?
X
c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
X
without theproject?
d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
X
levels existing without theproject?
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
X
would the project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise levels?
f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working
X
in the project area to excessive noise levels?
Impact Discussion:
The project would create additional noise in the area by allowing the keeping of approximately 12 dogs. The dogs
would generate some amount of noise, especially when people or cars approach the project site. The actual level of
noise depends on the size of dogs, the number of dogs, and the degree to which they are agitated. Typical noise
levels associated with agitated dogs can range from 75 to 85 decibels for seven dogs at 50 feet (Bollard, personal
correspondence). The nearest residential dwelling to the proposed project site is located approximately 400 feet to
the east, and is buffered by trees. Another residence is located approximately 600 feet to the west. Since distance
from a source of noise has an attenuating effect — for every doubling of distance the level of sound decreases by
approximately six decibels — noise levels at nearby homes from barking dogs can be expected to range from 55 to 70
decibels when the dogs are agitated. The 24-hour equivalent noise level associated with the dogs depends on the
frequency by which they are disturbed, the time of day at which they are agitated, and their temperament. If kept
inside the kennel building, the sound of the dogs' barking may not be perceptible to people in neighboring buildings.
Given the agricultural zoning and character of the area, the sensitivity to noise impacts in this area is relatively lower
than other more populated parts of the county. The mitigation measure included below reduces any potential impact
to a less -than -significant level.
Some temporary increase in noise is expected as the site is prepared and construction occurs for the implementation
of the proposed project. Because of the character of the area, the distance to neighboring residential uses and
buildings, the temporary nature of such activities, the impact is less than significant.
The project is not located in the 65 or 70 CNEL airport noise contour, according to the Butte County General Plan.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 15 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kenn*bent Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 .
Mitieation Measure # 4:
If the Department of Development Services or other County departments receive noise -related complaints regarding
the project and the level of noise is in excess of established standards, the applicant shall implement
recommendations of the Department of Development Services to reduce the noise impacts.
Timing: The applicant shall implement measures to reduce noise impacts if they are recommended by the
Department of Development Services as a result of complaints during the operational phase of the project.
Monitoring: Building inspectors shall spot check and shall ensure compliance on-site, if necessary.
4.12 HOUSING:
Impact Discussion:
The project would not affect the population of the area.
The project would not displace individuals or housing. No impact would occur.
Mitigation Measure: None required
4.13 PUBLIC SERVICES:
Potentially
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
Significant
with
Significant
No
Under
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
Previous
Incorporated
Document
a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
X
extension of roads or other infrastructure?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
X
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
X
elsewhere?
c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating
the construction of replacement housinelsewhere?-
X
Impact Discussion:
The project would not affect the population of the area.
The project would not displace individuals or housing. No impact would occur.
Mitigation Measure: None required
4.13 PUBLIC SERVICES:
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■.Planning Division ■ Page 16 ■
Potentially
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
Significant
with
Significant
No
Under
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
Previous
Incorporated
Document
a. Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of
or need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts, in
X
order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times, or other performance objectives
for any of the public services?
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■.Planning Division ■ Page 16 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kenn?&ert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 •
Impact Discussion:
The project site is located in an area with no data regarding fire hazard according to GIS data from the California
Division of Forestry. The site is located between portions of the county that are designated as having very high
hazard (to the west, approximately one-half mile) and having low fire hazard (to the west, approximately one mile).
Fire protection services for the project site are provided by the Butte County Fire Department in coordination with
the State Division of Forestry. The project is required to comply with conditions specified by the Division of
Forestry, to be accomplished in coordination with the But County Fire Department. Since the project involves
only a small amount of additional building, and since the project is required to comply with Department of Forestry
conditions, the project will not increase the level of fire service needed on the site.
The proposal may result in minimal increase in demand for police services. Responses to noise complaints or other
complaints at the property would not affect the ability of the Sheriffs Department to adequately provide police
services since the project would result in very little change from existing conditions.
The proposal would not result in an increase in demand for, school facilities in the area.
The project would not result in significant -impacts to area parks and facilities.
A less -than -significant impact is anticipated on other public services.
Mitigation Measure: None required.
4.14 RECREATION:
Less Than
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Significant
with
Less Than
Significant
No
Under
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
Previous
Incorporated
Document
b. Fireprotection?
X
c. Police Protection?
X
d. Schools?
X
e. Parks?
X
f. Other public services?
X
Impact Discussion:
The project site is located in an area with no data regarding fire hazard according to GIS data from the California
Division of Forestry. The site is located between portions of the county that are designated as having very high
hazard (to the west, approximately one-half mile) and having low fire hazard (to the west, approximately one mile).
Fire protection services for the project site are provided by the Butte County Fire Department in coordination with
the State Division of Forestry. The project is required to comply with conditions specified by the Division of
Forestry, to be accomplished in coordination with the But County Fire Department. Since the project involves
only a small amount of additional building, and since the project is required to comply with Department of Forestry
conditions, the project will not increase the level of fire service needed on the site.
The proposal may result in minimal increase in demand for police services. Responses to noise complaints or other
complaints at the property would not affect the ability of the Sheriffs Department to adequately provide police
services since the project would result in very little change from existing conditions.
The proposal would not result in an increase in demand for, school facilities in the area.
The project would not result in significant -impacts to area parks and facilities.
A less -than -significant impact is anticipated on other public services.
Mitigation Measure: None required.
4.14 RECREATION:
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 17 ■
Less Than
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Significant
with
Less Than
Significant
No
Under
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
p
Previous
Incorporated
Document
a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other recreational facilities such
that substantial physical deterioration of the facility
X
would occur or be accelerated?
b. Include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
X
environment?
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 17 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kenn*obert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 •
Impact Discussion:
No recreational facilities are proposed under this proposal. No impacts on existing or future recreational facilities is
expected.
Mitieation Measure: None required
4.15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC:
Impact Discussion:
The project would have access via Craig Avenue near the intersections of Palermo Honcutt, Citrus, and Refuge. No
new driveways or access points are proposed.
There would be no significant increase in traffic associated with the project.
Mitit=_ation Measure: None required
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 18 ■
Potentially
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
Significant
with
Significant
No
Under
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impp act
Previous
Document
Incorporated
a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
X
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or
X
hi wa s?
c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
X
location that results in substantial -.safety.. risks?
d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections), or
X
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e. Result in inadequate emergency access?
X
f. Result in inadequate parldng capacity?
X
g. Conflict with accepted policies, plans. or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus
X
turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Impact Discussion:
The project would have access via Craig Avenue near the intersections of Palermo Honcutt, Citrus, and Refuge. No
new driveways or access points are proposed.
There would be no significant increase in traffic associated with the project.
Mitit=_ation Measure: None required
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 18 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kennsert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 •
4.16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS:
Impact Discussion:
The proposed project would include a septic system for sewer service and an individual well for water service.
Thus, the project would not have a significant impact on any wastewater or water treatment facilities.
No off-site storm water drainage improvements should be required due to development of the project site.
The project may increase the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill by a minimal amount.
According to the Butte County Public Works Department, the Neal Road Landfill is expected to reach maximum
holding capacity by the year 2018. The project would have little or no impact on the capacity of this landfill.
No impact would occur with respect to federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste.
Mideation Measure: None required
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 19 ■
Potentially
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
Significant
with
Significant
No
Under
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
Previous
Document
Incorporated
a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
X
b. Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could
X
cause significant environmental effects?
c. Require or result in the construction of new storm
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
X
significant environmental effects?
d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements
X
needed?
e. Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
X
project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted:.:.
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste—
X
disposal needs?
g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes, and
regulations related to solid waste?
X
Impact Discussion:
The proposed project would include a septic system for sewer service and an individual well for water service.
Thus, the project would not have a significant impact on any wastewater or water treatment facilities.
No off-site storm water drainage improvements should be required due to development of the project site.
The project may increase the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill by a minimal amount.
According to the Butte County Public Works Department, the Neal Road Landfill is expected to reach maximum
holding capacity by the year 2018. The project would have little or no impact on the capacity of this landfill.
No impact would occur with respect to federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste.
Mideation Measure: None required
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 19 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kennobert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 •
4.17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (SECTION 15065):
With the implementation of recommended mitigation measures, the project does not have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the environment beyond the impacts discussed in the previous sections of this
Initial Study.
The project has the potential to contribute impacts that, are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable with
respect to Initial Study Checklist Items 4.3 - Air Quality, 4.8 - Hydrology and Water Quality, and 4.11 — Noise.
Cumulative impacts to these areas would be mitigated due to the inclusion of mitigation measures included in each
of these sections and summarized in the following section.
5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS:
Mitigation Measure #1:
The project applicant shall prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog waste, which shall be submitted to the
Environmental Health Department for approval in conjunction with their review of the septic system The project
applicant shall implement any measures recommended by the Environmental Health Department and Animal Control
Division for disposing of the dog waste.
Timing: Plans for disposal and recommendations of the Environmental Health Department and Animal Control
Division shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel.
Monitoring: Building inspectors shall spot check for aspects of the plan that involve improvements to the property.
The Animal Control Division shall respond to complaints dealing with odors.
Mitigation Measure # 2:
The applicant shall provide for percolation and other tests deemed necessary by, and to the satisfaction of, the
Department of Environmental Health for the septic system proposed on-site. All feasible measures recommended by the
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 20 ■
Potentially
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Reviewed
Would the proposal:
Significant
with
Significant
No
Under
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
Previous
Document
Incorporated
a. Have the potential to substantially degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
X
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
X
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects and the effects of probable future
projects)?
c. Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
X
beings, either directly or indirectly?
With the implementation of recommended mitigation measures, the project does not have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the environment beyond the impacts discussed in the previous sections of this
Initial Study.
The project has the potential to contribute impacts that, are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable with
respect to Initial Study Checklist Items 4.3 - Air Quality, 4.8 - Hydrology and Water Quality, and 4.11 — Noise.
Cumulative impacts to these areas would be mitigated due to the inclusion of mitigation measures included in each
of these sections and summarized in the following section.
5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS:
Mitigation Measure #1:
The project applicant shall prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog waste, which shall be submitted to the
Environmental Health Department for approval in conjunction with their review of the septic system The project
applicant shall implement any measures recommended by the Environmental Health Department and Animal Control
Division for disposing of the dog waste.
Timing: Plans for disposal and recommendations of the Environmental Health Department and Animal Control
Division shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel.
Monitoring: Building inspectors shall spot check for aspects of the plan that involve improvements to the property.
The Animal Control Division shall respond to complaints dealing with odors.
Mitigation Measure # 2:
The applicant shall provide for percolation and other tests deemed necessary by, and to the satisfaction of, the
Department of Environmental Health for the septic system proposed on-site. All feasible measures recommended by the
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 20 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kennebert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 •
Department of Environmental Health to reduce potential impacts associated with the septic system shall be implemented.
The Department of Environmental Health will also assess the applicant's plans regarding outdoor dog waste to ensure
that the project will not significantly degrade water quality. Any feasible measures recommended by the Department of
Environmental Health to reduce impacts to water quality shall be implemented by the project applicant.
Timing: The Final Map shall demonstrate the location of septic system components as recommended by the
Department of Environmental Health.
Monitoring: The Department of Environmental Health shall spot check and shall ensure compliance on-site.
Mitigation Measure # 3:
Place the following conditions on the building plans:
c Identify the usable sewage disposal area proved to meet the requirements of the County Improvement Standards
Appendix VII.
d Place a note on the map that states that no water well may be placed within 100 feet of the Usable Sewage
Disposal Area.
Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown or noted on building plans.
Timing: The building plans shall include required information and requirements of the condition shall be adhered
to during project construction.
Monitoring: The Planning Division and the Public Works Department shall ensure that the note is placed on the
building plans. Building inspectors shall spot check and shall ensure compliance on-site.
Mitigation Measure # 4:
If the Department of Development Services: or other County departments receive noise -related complaints regarding
the project and the level of noise . is in excess. of established standards, the applicant shall implement
recommendations of the Department of Development Services to reduce the noise impacts.
Timing: The applicant shall implement measures to reduce noise impacts if they are recommended by the
Department of Development Services as a result of complaints during the operational phase of the project.
Monitoring: Building inspectors shall spot check and shall ensure compliance on-site, if necessary.
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL:
1. Bollard, Paul. Bollard and Brennan, Noise and Acoustical Analysts. Personal correspondence, February 15,
2002.
2. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178.
Oroville, CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987.
3. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Man. Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983.
4. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map. Butte
County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989.
5. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County GIS Data. Oroville, CA: November 2001.
6. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element.
Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 21 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kenn*ert Vannucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10 •
7. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2. Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill,
1977.
8. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: C112M Hill,
1977.
9'.
Butte County Planning Department.
Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safes
Element. Oroville, CA:
C112M Hill, 1977.
10.
Butte County Planning Department.
Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4, Safety
Element. Oroville, CA:
CH2M Hill, 1977.
11.
Butte County Planning Department.
Noise Element Map IV -1, Scenic Highway
Element. Oroville, CA:
C112M Hill, 1977.
12.
Butte County Planning Department.
Scenic Highways Map V-1, Scenic Highway
Element. Oroville, CA:
CH2M Hill, 1977.
13.
Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1,
Safety Element. Oroville,
CA CH2M Hill, 1977.
14.
National Flood Insurance Program.
Flood Insurance Rate Mans. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
1989.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 22 ■
Project Name: Private Dog Kenn *ert Vanucci, Use Permit, File # UP 02-10
7.0 CONSULTED AGENCIES:
[X]
Environmental Health [X]
Public Works [ ]
Building Manager
[ ]
BCAG [ ]
ALUC [X]
LAFCo.
[X]
Assessor [X]
Development Services [ ]
Chico Unified School Distr.
[ ]
Air Qual. Management Dist. [ ]
City of Chico [ ]
City of Biggs
[ ]
City of Gridley [ ]
City of Oroville [ ]
Town of Paradise
[X]
CA Department of Forestry [ ]
Caltrans (Traffic) [ ]
Central Reg. Water Quality
[ ]
Department of Conservation [ ]
CA Dept. of Fish and Game [ ]
Highway Patrol
[ ]
Army Corps of Engineers [ ]
US Fish & Wldlife Service [X]
Agricultural Commissioner
[ ]
Butte Co. Farm Bureau [ ]
Oroville Union School Dist. [ ]
Feather River Rec. Dist.
[ ]
El Medio Fire Dept. [ ]
OWID [ ]
LOAPUD
[ ]
PG&E [ ]
Pacific Bell [ ]
Palermo Union School Dist.
[X]
Animal Control
8.0 PROJECT SPONSOR(S) INCORPORATION OF MITIGATION INTO
PROPOSED PROJECT:
Me have reviewed the Initial Study for the Gertrude Hon, Canine Retreat (APN # 006-
680-004) application and particularly the mitigation measures identified herein. UWe
hereby modify the application on file with the Butte County Planning Department to
include and incorporate all mitigations set forth in this Initial Study.
Aw 'w0z—
Project Ssor/Project Agent Date
Project Sponsor/Project Agent
Date
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 23 ■
0
March 29, 2002
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AND
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing
will be held on April 25, 2002, at 9:30 A.M. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors'
Room County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, at
9:30 a.m. regarding the following item
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study
has been prepared for the following project:
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/USE PERMIT
Robert Vannucci, Use Permit to allow a private dog kennel on property with one single-
family dwelling and accessory structures. The Use Permit would allow the boarding of
Vanucci's personal dogs. A maximum of 12 dogs is anticipated, according to the project
applicant. The dogs would be kept in a proposed kennel building and surrounding fenced
area. An additional septic system on-site is proposed to handle waste from the dogs.
Sanitary sewer service for the house on-site is, and would continue to be, provided by a
septic tank. Water is, and would continue to be, obtained from wells on the site.
Construction of the kennel building, notwithstanding provisions of this Initial Study, will
require a Building Permit, and the applicant will be required to comply with any
conditions associated with the Building Permit process. The applicant would be required
to obtain a sewage disposal permit for the additions to the septic system from the
Environmental Health Department. The property is zoned A-5 (Agricultural, 5 -acre
parcels) and is located at 3011 Craig Avenue (Craig Avenue is a private road accessible
via Palermo Honcutt), Oroville area. APN# 027-270-034 (CS) (UP 02-10)
The initial study for the project identifies potentially significant effects, but revisions in
the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur.
Therefore, Planning Division staff is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
The Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project are on file
for public review starting, April 5, 2002, through April 24, 2002, at the Butte County
Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. All interested persons are
invited to review the document. Written comments will be accepted by the Planning
Division at the above address.
If you challenge either the Mitigated Negative Declaration or the Use Permit in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning
Division at, or prior to, the public hearing.
For further information regarding this project, please contact Craig Sanders, project
planner, at the Butte County Planning Division at (530) 538-7603.
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION
FRED DAVIS, INTERIM DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
To be published in the Oroville Mercury on Friday, April 5, 2002.
0
MEMORANDUM
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
TO: Larry Painter
FROM: Lynn
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR EXHIBITS AND PUBLIC NOTICE LIST
DATE: March 29, 2002
Project Name: _Robert J. Vannucci File #:
THIS IS A REQUEST FOR:
Black & white reproducible exhibit map
PC/Board/DRC
Vicinity Map
Planning Manager Exhibit Map
Extension of Time Exhibit Map
Color Planning Commission Exhibit Map
Color Board of Supervisors Exhibit Map
Public Notice List
Special Exhibits
Backread Ordinance
Public Notice List:
Special instructions:
The above request is due no later than April 4, 2002
Special Instructions and/or research:
UP 02-10
Meeting Date
4/25/02
Number
of
Copies
Im
NOTE: Exhibits should be saved until project is through process, which includes appeal period.
FILE SAVED AS:
Eatte, Co
L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530) 538-7785
March 29, 2002
Robert J. Vannucci
3011 Craig Avenue
Oroville, CA 959.66
Re: Use Permit, AP 027-270-034, UP 02-10
Mr. Vannucci:
A public hearing has been set for April 25, 2002, at 9:30 a.m. concerning your application for a Use
Permit to allow for a private (non-commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone to house owners personal
dogs. Craig Avenue, a private road off of Reservoir Road, a northerly extension of Ontario Road.
This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville,
California.
Should you have any concerns with the report or conditions of approval, please contact us in advance
of the meeting so that we may work together to resolve your concerns.
The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be
present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact M. A. Meleka of this office at
538-7601, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
Lynn Richardson
Planning/Administrative
Support Service Assistant
Enc.
cc:
j:\wpdocs\pc1ts\schedu1e.mrg
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
COUNT�-
Ad
DEC 27 2001
WATLti Ob
9'�;�cruaE%
•
BUTTE COUNTY
vT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
AGRICULTURAL COMMISSION
Butte County Planning Division
Request for Comments on a Development Application: Robert J. Vannucci, UP 02-10
December 21, 2001
CONTACT PERSON: M. A. Meleka
The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment
sheet is to:
1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project
and submit conditions, if any; and to
2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular
environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated.
If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing
date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed,
please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an application for Use Permit to allow for arip 'vate (non-commercial.) dog kennel in the A-5 zone to house os■rn rs
personal dogs, on property zoned -&--5 located Craig Avenue, a private road off of Reservoir Road, a northerly extension
of Ontario Road, identified as APN 027-270-034. Supervisorial District No. 1.
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
_X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON April25,2002.
COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN January 4, 2002, If no comments or
communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment.
COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary):
AeiML'1AUJxk t su�c.s
By: ►�Q� • &Vm4 . Date: L 2 D D Z
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785
EJ
u y
Ti��L OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530) 538-7785
FAX TRANSMISSION
To: Cotton Bridges/ Associates Date: January 8, 2002
ATTN: Randy Chafin Pages: (including cover sheet) 2
Fax #: (916) 780-9388
From: Diane Lewellen
Subject: Request for comments re: UP 02-10
Additional Comments: Randy, I will be faxing these comments to you.as we receive them.
If you have any questions, please give me a call at (530) 538-6869.
Thank You,
Diane
BUTTE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
$17V/to'
TO: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 100,
,C�Vhjy % �O
FROM: Butte County Planning Division 01- Ville v�®,
RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Robert J. Vannucci,;UP 02-10 C8 yQ
DATE: December 21, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: M. A. Meleka
The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment
sheet is to:
1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project
and submit conditions, if any; and to
2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular
environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want. incorporated.
If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing
date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed,
please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an application for Use Permit to allow fora private (non-commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone to house owners
personal dogs, on property zoned -A--d located Craig Avenue, a private road off of Reservoir Road 'a northerly extension
of Ontario Road, identified as APN 027-270-034. Supervisorial District No. 1.
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
_X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ONArip l 25, 2002.
COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN January 4, 2002. If no comments or
communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment.
.COMMENTS (Attach additional naRes if necessarv):
III
BUTTE COUNTY
PLANNING DIVISION
By: Date: ID')
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785
t e county
LAND O F NATURAL WEALTH AND B E A U T Y
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530) 538-7785
FAX TRANSMISSION
To: Cotton Bridges/ Associates Date: January 3, 2002
ATTN: Randy Chafin Pages: (including cover sheet) 5
Fax #: (916) 780-9388
From: Diane Lewellen
Subject: Request for comments re: UP 02-10
Additional Comments: Randy, I will be faxing these comments to you as we receive them.
If you have any questions, please give me a call at (530) 538-6869.
Thank You,
Diane
0 •
BUTTE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
TO: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR
FROM: Butte County Planning Division
RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Robert J. Vannucci, UP 02-10
DATE: December 21, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: M. A. Meleka
The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment
sheet is to:
1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project
and submit conditions, if any; and to
2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular
environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated.
If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing
date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed,
please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an application for Use Permit to allow for arip vate (non-commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone to house owners
personal dogs, on property zoned _6_-� located Craig Avenue, a private road off of Reservoir Road, a northerly extension
of Ontario Road, identified as APN _027-270-034. Supervisorial District No. 1•
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
_X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON April 25, 2002.
COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN January 4, 2002. If no comments or
communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment.
COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary):
M
Date:
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 -,FAX 530-538-7785
BUTTE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
FROM: Butte County Planning Division
RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Robert J. Vannucci, UP 02-10
DATE: December 21, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: M. A. Meleka
The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment
sheet is to:
1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project
and submit conditions, if any; and to
2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular
environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated.
If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing
date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed,
please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an application for Use Permit to allow fora private (non-commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone to house o�am r
personal does, on property zoned -A-_5 located Craig Avenue, a private road off of Reservoir Road, a northerly extension
of Ontario Road, identified as APN 027-270-034. Supervisorial District No. 1.
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
_X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON A ril 25, 2002.
COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN _January 4, 2002. If no comments or
communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment.
COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary):
TZo�c._ ft/eAl -- //< Ute
By: Date: D /�aZ AZ 7—
RECEIVED RECEIVED
DEC 2.6 2001
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785
90UNTY OF BUTTE
LAND DEVELOPMENT DIV.
TO:
FROM
RE:
DATE:
•
BUTTE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
Butte County Planning Division
Request for Comments on a Development Application: Robert J. Vannucci, UP 02-10
December 21, 2001
CONTACT PERSON: M. A. Meleka
The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment
sheet is to:
1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project
and submit conditions, if any; and to
2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular
environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated.
If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing
date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed,
please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an application for Use Permit to allow fora private (non-commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone to house owners
personal dogs, on property zoned -A-_5 located Craig Avenue a private road off of Reservoir Road, a northerly extension
of Ontario Road, identified as APN 027-270-034. Supervisorial District No. 1.
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
_X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON April 25, 2002.
COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN January 4, 2002. If no comments or
communications dre received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment.
COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessa ):
By: Date:
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785
BUTTE COUNTY
•
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR
USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: Robert J. Vannucci DATE: December 21, 2001
AGENT:
APN: 027-270-034
FILE #: UP 02-10 PLANNER: M. A. Meleka
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit to allow for a private (non-commercial) dog kennel in the
A-5 zone to house owners personal dogs.
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
PLEASE CONTACT THE BUTTE COUNTY FIRE. DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS
1. Construction, installation or development of structures or facilities on the parcels/lots shall comply with
the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, (Public Resources Code 4290), and all other applicable State
and County codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of application for improvement
permits.
k- 2. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code
4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and maintained continuously
thereafter.
Fire hydrant identification, reflector or post reflectors shall be installed acceptable to the County Fire
Warden.
—4. In lieu of a pressurized water system or water storage tank, payment of $200.00 per created parcel into
the Battalion _ water tend fund, is required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
— 5. A pressurized community water system for fire protection is required. The specific locations and fire
flow requirements shall be in accordance with the Fire Department specifications and to the satisfaction
of the County Fire Warden. Average required hydrant spacing _ feet, hydrant size _ inches, and
residual fire flow _ gpm. Submit plans to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to
construction of facilities.
In lieu of hydrant installation, payment may be made into the hydrant fund at a cost of $1.72 per
lineal foot of street frontage. The estimated fee amount is $
Prior to recordation of the Map or application for a building permit, the applicant shall pay the then
current fee for the West Chico Fire Station Fund.
—8. Provide an all weather access of at least 10 foot wide and with a vertical clearance of 15 feet that will
accommodate a 40,000 pound fire apparatus to all structures.
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785
0. 4
- - utie Count
IAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530) 538-7785
FAX TRANSMISSION
To: Cotton Bridges/ Associates Date: December 31, 2001
ATTN: Randy Chafin Pages: (including cover sheet) 2
Fax #: (916) 780-9388
From: Diane Lewellen
Subject: Request for comments re: UP 02-10
Additional Comments: Randy, I will be faxing these comments to you as we receive them.
If you have any questions, please give me a call at (530) 538-6869.
Thank You,
Diane
BUTTE COUNTY LAFCo
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION DEC 2 7 2001
TO: LAFCo OPoville, Califomip
FROM: Butte County Planning Division
RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Robert J. Vannucci, UP 02-10
DATE: December 21, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: M. A. Meleka
The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment
sheet is to:
1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project
and submit conditions, if any; and to
2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular
environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated.
If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing
date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed,
please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an application for Use Permit to allow for arip vate (non-commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone to house owners
personal dogs_, on property zoned -A--5 located Craig Avenue a private road off of Reservoir Road, a northerly extension
of Ontario Road, identified as APN 027-270-034. Supervisorial District No. 1.
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
_X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ONrip l 25, 2002.
COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN January 4, 2002. If no comments or
communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment.
COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary):
'I tWi i .�
By: 41 Date: - �J aj to
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785
AP 027-270-034
Robert Vannucci
UP 02-10
LEAD IN SHEET
FILE NO: 1'1 1 AP# 027-270-034
APPLICANT: Robert J. Vannucci- 3011 Craig Avenue, Oroville. CA 95966
OWNER:
REPRESENTATIVE:
REQUEST: Use Permit to allow for a private (non-commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone to
house owners personal dogs,
SIZE:
LOCATION: Craig Avenue, a private road off of Reservoir Road, a norther]. )f
Ontario C•,•
SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT # —L EXISTING ZONING: A-5
ZONING HISTORY:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
SITE HISTORY:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LDR (Low Density Residential)
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
0
LEAD IN SHEET
FILE NO: (kP QQ, -1.0 AP# Od7 - ) 7V -- 43 y
APPLICANT:__ V+M4y�-1 3011 C 41e r���.y eouic ccs 64 fxjrGc,
Saco- 53 3- 7873
OWNER:
REPRESENTATIVE: S'4�
REQUEST: rAc A 4pl,4A4tz-
.ter Ilh'' A—S- mcaWl--Ws Pzt/�s ,fie, does.
SIZE:
LOCATION: CAAcG- A-�, S"yoi,� /���%>�✓
17
SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT # l , dcxFz& EXISTING ZONING:
ZONING HISTORY: __ 04&''0 60/0 7L7J- Ae O 16 a
SURROUNDING ZONING: A 5 -
SURROUNDING
SURROUNDING LAND USE: c �o�
SITE HISTORY: ,!/ONy`
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: kbl?
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: _ �- Zo �C3) ✓P lc�n,,��1
1 _ W,91 i
i
Date Application Received /g &'L 01
Date Project Assigned
30 Day Complete P gllllv� L9.3—
Preset
.3 -
Preset Hearing_Date zis ftalL 9-g--
F�CIbC®USA Airbill Nebe *23 9768 6268
From Pra—pnetmrdiso-hent .
Senders FedEx
Date �moi / / / Account Number 1396-1873-3
NamersY`()i.A. rneleka Phone ( 530) 538-7601
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT
Address 7 COUNTY CENTER DR '
Dept/RoorfSUftedRoom
Dm OROV I LLE state CA ZIP 95965
2 Your Internal BillinggReference aa�10 OPTIONAL
RM 24 characterswis appsar on ce.
3 To
RecipienCsP` Ueca J � Phone WO -7.320
Name
Company f\7) QAS hT�0CA L1Jb.A
Address ) co
To 'HOLD' at Feder location, prim FedEx address
Sk.►� tea. -C
r/�1 a aept/R-jSuimMoam
CIN ONUS Pi111! I P State Zl P. 9,!i/ 1 - qs o /Q
See back for application instructions.
Questions? Call 7.800•Go•FedE)O (800-463-3339)
Visk our Web site at www.fedox.com
By using this Airbill you agree to the service conditions on the back of this Airbill
and in our current Service Guide, including terms that limit our liability.
5AG23
Fo� � •
LO. N. 15 �W' y:�jJ�`J , 1
4a Express Package Service Pecka as up to 150 lbs. •
Delivery commionem may be lamr in some areas
❑ FedExPrio iOvemight WFedExStandard Overnight ❑ FedEx First Overril
N. in
sinass momma ea business afternoon Eadiesi nen mwinass mommg
deliveryto selem locations
❑FedEx 2Day'❑FedEx Express Saver"
Second business day Third business day • FedEx Errveropelleaer Rem am available
Mmmmm cherga. One -pound rete
•
4b Express Freight Service Packages over 150 lbs.
Mao,
Delivery commionammay in soma areas.
❑ FedExIDa� Freight' ❑ FedEx2DayFreight ❑ FedEx3DayFreight
•
NextbudaZ y Second business day Thirdbusiness ry
y
•wororcamhmawre
�
5 Packaging Deplaredvaluewfttan
o
k FedEx Envelope/Letter" ❑ FedEx Pak" ❑ Other Pkg.
•'r.°
Includes redEs eoc FadEc
Tube, and cusmmer pkg.
n
2
6 Special Handling F— Include FedEx address in Sections
❑SATURDAYDelivery SUNDAY Delivery HOLDWeekday HOLD Saturday
aVaaamaro FadFxP ❑ava9auam FedEzPriory ❑at FedEx Location ❑atFedhcabon
r`",
•
m y
OvertdgmeM Fed&20ry Ovum'rylnmselectZIPcades NmevadablewM Avelablo lm Fed&Priority
o
mselemZIPcodes FedEx Fust Overnight Ovens, and FedEx Slay
Does this shipment contain dangerous goods? up select
T
r One box must be checked I
NO ❑
❑ Yes
F]Sh
s
•
L�h As on,.,had per's Declaration Ory1coC9. UN 180 a ke
Shipper's Declaration nmregmred
❑ Cargo
T
x
Dangerous Goods cannot be shipped in FedEx packaging Aircraft Only
7 Payment Wilbl.
z
l Enter Fed& AccL No, or credit Card No. below.
—4
[Sender ❑ Recipient ❑ Third Parry ❑ Credit Card E]Cash/Check
Sectio
•
«er
n
I in be bErod.
m
FedbAcet No.
0
Y
Cre&CaNa
d
pc
Total Packages Total Weight Total Declared Valuet
a
$ .00
tour liability is limited to $100 unless you declare a highervatue. See back for details. FedEx Use Only
8 Release Signature sigamsuMorimderverywmomoambdngsigrwWm
•
81'signing you authorize us to deliver this shipment without obtaining a signature
0 1 4 1 99 527@ and agree to indemnity and hold us harmless from any resulting claims.
SR111-Rev, one &W -P.1 #154819.01994-99 Feffs•PRIKED IN USA
359
Terms And Conditions
Definitions On this Airbill, "we," "our," and "us" refer
to Federal Express Corporation, its employees, and agents.
"You" and "your" referto the sender, its employees, and agents.
Agreement To Terms By giving us your package to
deliver, you agree to all the terms on this Airbill and in our
current Service Guide, which is available on request You also
agree to those terms on behalf of any third party with an
interest in the package. If there is a conflict between the
Service Guide and this Airbill, the Service Guide will control.
No one is authorized to change the terms of our Agreement.
Responsibility For Packaging And Completing
Airbill You are responsible for adequately packaging your
goods and properly filling out this Airbill. If you omit the number
of packages and/or weight per package, our billing will be
based on our best estimate of the number of packages we
received and/or an estimated "default" weight per package
as determined by us.
Responsibility For Payment Even if you give us
different payment instructions, you will always be primarily
responsible for all delivery costs, as well as any cast we incur
in either returning your package to you or warehousing it
pending disposition.
Limitations On Our Liability
•
And Liabilities Not Assumed
• Our liability in connection with this shipment is limited to the
lesser of your actual damages or $100, unless you declare a
higher value, pay an additional charge, and document your
• actual loss in a timely manner. You may pay an additional
charge for each additional $100 of declared value. The
declared value does not constitute, nor do we provide, cargo
liability insurance.
. • In any event, we will not be liable for any damage, whether
direct, incidental, special, or consequential in excess of the
declared value of a shipment, whether or not Federal Express
had knowledge that such damages might be incurred
• including but not limited to loss of income or profits.
. 1 , 0
• We won't be liable:
— for your acts or omissions, including but not limited to
improper or insufficient packing, securing, marking, or
addressing, or those of the recipient or anyone else with
an interest in the package.
— if you or the recipient violates any of the terms of
our Agreement.
— for loss or damage to shipments of prohibited items.
— for loss, damage, or delay caused by events we cannot
control, including but not limited to acts of God, perils of
the air, weather conditions, acts of public enemies, war,
strikes,' civil commotions, or acts of public authorities
with actual or apparent authority.
Declared Value Limits
• The highest declared value allowed fora FedEx
Envelope/Letter and FedEx Pak shipment is $500.
• For other shipments, the highest declared value allowed is
$50,000 unless your package contains items of extraordinary
value, in which case the highest declared value allowed
is $500.
• Items of extraordinary value include shipments containing ,
such items as artwork, jewelry, furs, precious metals, nego-
tiable instruments, and other items listed in our Service Guide.
• You may send more than one package on this Airbill and fill
in the total declared value for all packages, notto exceed
the $100, $500, or $50,000 per package limit described above.
(Example: 5 packages can have a total declared value of up
to $250,000.) In that case, our liability is limited to the actual
value of the package(s) lost or damaged, but may not exceed
the maximum allowable declared value(s) orthe total declared
value, whichever is less. You are responsible for proving the
actual loss or damage.
Filing A Claim YOU MUST MAKE ALL CLAIMS IN
WRITING and notify us of your claim within strict time limits
set out in the current Service Guide.
You may call our Customer Service department at
1.800•Go•FedEx®(800-463-3339) to report a claim; however,
you must still file a timely written claim. .
Within 90 days after you notify us of your claim, you must
send us all the information you have about it We aren't
obligated to act on any claim until you have paid all
transportation charges, and you may not deductthe amount of
your claim from those charges.
If the recipient accepts your package without noting any
damage on the delivery record, we will assume the package
was delivered in good condition. For us to process your claim,
you must make the original shipping cartons and packing
available for inspection.
'Del iveri to Residential Locations Shipments to
residential locations using FedEx Express Saver may be
delivered without obtaining the recipient's signature.
'Right To Inspect We may, at our option, open and
inspect your packages before or after you give them to us
to deliver.
Right Of Rejection " We reserve the right to reject a
shipmentwhen such shipment would be likely to cause delay
or damage to other shipments, equipment, or personnel; or if
the shipment is prohibited by law; or if the shipment would
violate anyterms of our Airbill or our current Service Guide.
C.O.D. Services C.O.D. SERVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE
WITH THIS AIRBILL. If C.O.D. Service is required, please use
a Federal Express C.O.D. Airbill.
Air Transportation Tax Included Afederal excise
tax when required by the Internal Revenue Code on the air
transportation portion of this service, if any, is paid by us.
Money -Back Guarantee In the event of untimely
delivery, Federal Express will, at your request and with some
limitations, refund or credit all transportation charges. See
current Service Guide for more information.
Pert 115/813 • Rav 8/99
COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST
APPLICATION:
DATE:
County Offices and Cities:
_ Chief Administrative Officer
.L Develop. Services Director
_X_ Environmental Health
X Assesor
_ Sheriff
_ BCAG
X LAFCo
_ Air Quality Mgmt.
_ Biggs
_ Gridley
Oroville
_ Paradise
Information Systems Dept.
Animal Control
Irrigation District:
_ Butte Water
—Biggs/W. Gridley Water
OWID
_ Paradise Irrigation
Table Mountain Irrigation
_ Thennalito Irrigation
Domestic Water
_ Butte Water District
_California Water Service Co.
OWID
_ Thermalito ImgationDistrict
Sewer
_ Butte Water District
_ Themalito Irrigation
Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21)
_ L.O.A. PUD
Fire Protection
X California Department of Forestry
_ EI Medio Fire Protection District
Recreation Districts
Chico Area Recreation
_ Durham Area Recreation
_ Paradise Recreation & Park
_ Richvale Recreation & Parks
Utilities
_ PG&E North - Chico
_ Chambers Cable TV
PG&E South - Oroville
_ Viacom Cable TV
State Agencies
CalTrans (Traffic)
_ Dept. of Water Resources
_ Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter)
_ Dept of Parks and Rec.
_ Central Reg. Water Quality Cont.
_ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program
Department of Conservation
_ Off. of Mining Reclamation
_ Dept.Social Services, Comm.Care Licensing
Federal Agencies
_ US Forest Service
_ Army Corps of Engineers
Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc.
Lime Saddle Dist
_ Drainage
Reclamation
_ Butte Co. Mining Committee
_ Paradise Pines Com. Assoc.
Mosq. Abatement. Oroville/Butte Co
_ US Bureau of Land Management
_ National Marine Fisheries Sservice
_ Community Association
Butte Env.l Council
_ Cal Native Plant Society
Forest Ranch Community Assoc.
_ Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancy
_X_ -Public Works Director
Building Manager
ALUC
Butte Co. Farm Bureau
_ Chico
_ Chico Airport Commission
_X_ Agricultural Commission
_ Durham Irrigation
Richvale Irrigation
_ Other
_ Del Oro Water Co.
_ Other
Sterling City Sewer Main
_ Feather River Rec. & Park
Pacific Bell
_ Dept. of Fish and Game
Highway Patrol
Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations
_ US Fish & Wildlife Service
School Districts
K:\PLANNING\FORMS\DISTR.Ll
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
•
BUTTE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
Butte County Planning Division
Request for Comments on a Development Application: Robert J. Vannucci, UP 02-10
December 21, 2001
CONTACT PERSON: M. A. Meleka
The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment
sheet is to:
1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project
and submit conditions, if any; and to
2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular
environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated.
If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing
date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed,
please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an application for Use Permit to allow for arip vate (non-commercial) dog kennel in the A-5 zone to horse owners
personal dogs, on property zoned -A-S located Craig Avenue a private road off of Reservoir Road, a northerly extension
of Ontario Road, identified as APN 027-270-034. Supervisorial District No. 1•
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
_X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON April 25, 2002.
COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN January 4, 2002. If no comments or
communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment.
COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary):
By: Date:
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785
A-5
7-270-03 -5
A-5
A-5 � A-5
E cAy
BUTTE COUNTY
PLANNING DIVISION
DRECEOdE
D EC 1 8 2001
BUTTE COUNTY
PLANNING DIVISION
--_---- - - - - - -
i
' Oi2or/rcc•� �'wl,
EC "WE
DEC 18 2001
BUTTE COUNTY
PLANNING DIVISION
,yrrtriS+
c
C
6
( DA 4.Y)
T.
18 N. R: 4 E. I M. D. B. a M.
PALERMO CITRUS TRACT .NO.3
e ,
AVENUE
.r
7
2
4/
4.4 4c
726
IL
0
9.T7t At 2
D
,S Z
D
B R0 PO
!71
9.68* Ac
466.33
PALERMO C/TRUS TRACT SUB NO.3 M.O.R. WALL NO.5
NOTE: These parcels are for assessment purposes .
only and may not constitute 10901 parcels,
27--27
=400' i
I
1i
/6
Assessor's Map No. 27- 27
County of Butte, Calif.
REVISED: 2-94
I
I
-- -
I
LCAvg
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I `
I ILIO $c.a �e
I
I
I -
I `
I -
I
I o.
AO
I
I �
I , ,
I . ,
I �
I
I ,
I
I
� ice_ •� � .'r1
I .
COUNTY OF BUTTE
OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE
AN! 2 910 2, 0 .3 22
OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 rA
U–
A 82,0 -
74034i U•$-Y—*TAGF
RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED
�J--- _ _-_-_- 2- --l—
`270042000' ti
ALViN i GRETCHEN D
PUBLIC LE 100. OWIMAD'CT
VACAVI1,LE CA 95687
HEARI C E a W E
MULL100 9568735Z28 IB01 29 04/02/02
RETURN TO ZXNDER
NOrrI APR' 8 2002 MULLER
122 BLEDSOE CT
OROVILLE CA 95966-8251
RETURN TO SENDER
BUTTE COUNTY
PLANNING DIVISION
1111111,1411111111-1 its
i � , r: is -- �J • � ' '�"R_e ' � •��' 1 � �'�, � T ' '�4••S y r i � r � { .
_�-tea_., �,, , r �� z� � � � �, -� r� �y � 1 _ •�?� 1
qua
y �a� { ° fir+ , ` y �� ;' •a,�, ti 1, °'
tj
"• •. .,� •� ' tip`
.07 �+.,L � ,• �"� '�° ,. ,, ° � �°, , ' � ;ems,;,-
7-270=OT3
.: A_5 y -
I to U',,, .y' ..tib' L ;.� � � ' -" �. � �'�r�� •�� �� � �{ , . 4 '�, � �' `� '�-+ . `
F 161
..Ii vAJ ff
�'fi� Q 'U �" �i `i.1'°�� � `4`r �� �: 'r :r,�'��� " . � � � �, .��.• :aP'.._ r, �•�, �7r�°
ID bo �CI�Ql
eoI
04 J
` } dirr1F,-_ �` r r La Ar iu j }'' iit' = ? S• -rt
1{
b Vf;°a�,
N
� NoScae
i
� 1 -
.i4o
wt '
� PPS v
i
--------------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ �\
-pLo r TLAO
COUNTY OF BUTTEIr 44
OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT
tmsip1 R
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE ® fith 2 90 2 r �' ``•
OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 -
80
RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED
0 00"
PUBLIC S ORGE G & VERNA
341' JOHN LEE LN
ODESTO CA 95350-0926
HEARING
D —� HARM4'16 953500205 1501 02 04/01/02 ^^
! ,, ,s r.-zy .# RE-TURN-70—SENDER
NOTI....E_ , , �= -
APR. 5 2002 ± - 112 BLEDSOE CT _ ._....,.,,.�-• J9
ibc ;�.s +.2.._E + x�• ra . gad—v. '.a :
ORO VlLLE --C-A,- 9i5t9*F s-6251 -
RETURN TO -SENDER
BUTTE COUNTY _ .__ flid 1 f' It i I if I p j j jt ft. j �j t_: .) j ."j_ ( {
PLANNINttM3 1Io*10 q -: 7Ii llEli'EElic ililEiiiiii Ifj�+ llf+Iffff3tai—liEElf}If=i �fEiff�Ei!?1—If'
0
R
1
r