Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUP 02-15PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE #: UP 02-15 PROJECT TYPE: Use Permit APPLICANT: Lorraine M. Sehrt (Martin) ADDRESS: 6944 Upper Palermo Road, Oroville, CA 95966 OWNER: same ADDRESS: REPRESENTATIVE: ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for a private kennel PROPERTY ZONED: AR -1 (Agricultural Residential, 1 -acre parcels LOCATED between Bohemia Ave. and Messina Ave., Palermo AP#: 026-070-031 TOWN/AREA: Palermo GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Agricultural Residential on the west side of Upper Palermo Rd., midway 1. Application accepted: February 25, 2002 Amount: $ $1078.00 Receipt #: 20269 2. Comments sent to: Development Services Director, Public Works Director, Environmental Health, Assessor, LAFCo, Animal Control, Agricultural Commission, California Dept. of Forestry 3. Comments received from: E H D. Al • C.,.,,., LAt C. , CDY , Polo. wort 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 6. Assigned To: ('r�� ��s S• RC,"—s 7. Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No: q Subject to Fish & Game: l V Categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. -CEQA # 15061.(bx3) Other 8. Staff Report: Project Video: 9. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes Date Sent to SCH: 10. Publication Notice Written: 14 15 Display Ad Prepared: Notices Mailed: D o�- Number of Notices: o21 Newspaper Publication Date:_ 4— �O' 2 10) C P C' B Planning Commission Hearing(s):- Action taken: Special Conditions: Commission Resolution No Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Type Use Permit/Send for signature: �_ 2 ;7— o a- Ordinance No: Adopted: 16. N.O.E. / N.O.D. / APPENDIX G: Fish & Game Fees Paid: Yes No 17. Send validated Use Permit: 18. Assessor's Memo: 19. Copy of Use Permit / Variance to Planning Technician: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 Lorraine Sehrt (Martin), proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding environmental impacts and Use Permit to allow a private dog kennel. The Use Permit would allow the keeping of the applicant's personal dogs; no dogs owned by others would be boarded. A maximum of eleven (11) dogs would be allowed. Butte County Code allows no more than five dogs over the age of four months to be kept on a single parcel for any reason whatsoever. Solid wastes from the dogs are currently picked up every morning and buried on-site; however, the Butte County Environmental Health Department requires the dog wastes to be disposed of in a septic system. The applicant would be required to obtain a sewage disposal permit from the Environmental Health Department for either an addition to the existing septic system or for a second septic system. The applicant would also require a kennel permit from the Environmental Health Department's Animal Control Division for the kenneling of more than five dogs. The property is zoned AR -1 (Agricultural Residential —1 acre parcels) and is located on the west side of Upper Palermo Road, midway between Bohemia Avenue and Messina Avenue, at 6944 Upper Palermo Road, Palermo. APN 026- 070-031 (SB) (UP 02-15) Mr. Betts gave a brief summary of the project. He presented a letter received from the Millers objecting to the odor. The hearing was opened to the public. Lorraine Sehrt submitted two letters from neighbors in favor of the kennel. She also submitted pictures of the kennels. She agreed to all the conditions and stated that she loves her dogs. The hearing was closed. Commissioner Lambert said that she liked the condition to change the blue tarps to wood. There was a brief discussion about the subject kennel being a violation and that the Permit would correct the problem. It was moved by Commissioner Leland, seconded by Commissioner Lambert, and unanimously carried to approve the Use Permit for Lorraine Sehrt (Martin) subject to the findings and conditions listed below. I. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study identified significant environmental effects and includes mitigation measures that would mitigate such effects below significant levels; a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. B. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. C. On the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study and any comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ JUNE 27, 2002 ■ PAGE 12 ■ Use Permit for Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin, Planning Division File No. UP 02-15, will have a significant effect on the environment. D. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. E. The project will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a "de minimus" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d) (3) and 14 CCR 753.5, is not required. IV. Approve Use Permit 02-15 for Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin, subject to the following findings and the conditions in Exhibit "A": A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: Conditions of approval have been applied to this project after CEQA review. The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Low Density Residential. The Low Density Residential land use designation allows animal husbandry as a Secondary Use. The AR -1 zone allows kennels with approval of a Use Permit. B. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use would be compatible with, and would not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed project will involve minor improvements to the property including a septic system to handle the dog waste that will be required to comply with County Improvement Standards. Otherwise, no changes to buildings or density are proposed. 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities No additional services are needed to accommodate this project. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The nearest residential dwellings are located approximately 275 feet from the site of the dog kennel. The proposed project site is buffered not only by distance but also by trees between the proposed site and the nearest ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ JUNE 27, 2002 ■ PAGE 13 i residence. Various farm animals are kept on surrounding and nearby properties, and as such the proposal would not adversely affect neighborhood character as long as the conditions specified in the Initial Study and in Exhibit A are followed. 4. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or proposed development: The site is suited for the project because the property is located in a predominantly agricultural and low-density residential area and because the proposed use is allowed with the issuance of a Use Permit. 5. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed kennel application to County agencies and has received responses that indicated there is no evidence that the use, with appropriate conditions, would cause any other relevant planning -related impact. The project would require a kennel permit from the Animal Control Division of the Public Health Department. The findings and criteria for this type ofpermit are different than the findings and criteria for the Use Permit. If this Use Permit is approved, its approval does not preclude the Animal Control Division from denying the kennel permit. The planning -related impacts of this project appear to be minor in general, assuming all conditions are dutifully executed. C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Conditions of Approval: Planning Division: 1. Mitigation Measure: The project applicant shall pick up solid wastes from the dogs at least once per day and dispose of the wastes in a septic system approved by the Butte County Environmental Health Division. Timing: The mitigation measure shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel. Monitoring: The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to complaints concerning odors from dog wastes. i 2. Mitigation Measure: Prior to issuance of the Use Permit, the project applicant shall prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog waste, which shall be submitted to the Environmental Health ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ JUNE 27, 2002 ■ PAGE 14 ■ Division for approval in conjunction with their review of the septic system. The project applicant shall implement any measures recommended by the Environmental Health Division and Animal Control Division for disposing of the dog waste. Timing: Plans for disposal and recommendations of the Environmental Health Division and Animal Control Division shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel. Monitoring: Building inspectors shall spot check for aspects of the plan that involve improvements to the property. The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to complaints concerning odors. Mitigation Measure: If the Department of Development Services or other County departments receive noise -related complaints regarding the project and the level of noise is in excess of established standards, the applicant shall implement recommendations of the Department of Development Services to reduce the noise impacts. In response to any pattern of noise complaints, the Development Services Department, at the expense of the applicant, shall conduct a noise analysis to establish the compliance of the project with standards in the Noise Element of the General Plan. Currently, the Noise Element establishes that acceptable levels of noise for the project area of up to 60 decibels Ldn or CNEL. If noise levels are in excess of established standards, the project applicant is required to reduce noise levels through recommendations of the Development Services Department, which may include, but are not limited to, building noise attenuation devices that provide some relief to nearby homes, erecting a sight obscuring fence so that the dogs can't see off the site, placing bark collars on the dogs that bark, or other recommendations. Any implemented recommendations to reduce noise would be subject to Building Permits and other applicable conditions. Timing: The applicant shall implement measures to reduce noise impacts as required by the Department of Development Services as a result of complaints during the operational phase of the project. Monitoring: The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to noise complaints. 4. The Use Permit is limited to a maximum of eight (8) dogs over the age of four (4) months kept on the site. The eleven (11) dogs that are kept by the applicant at the time of the approval of the Use Permit are allowed, and are required to be registered with the Animal Control Division. The existing 11 dogs are allowed until they are reduced in number by attrition. The applicant is required to prepare records of the 11 dogs' name,. age, sex, and breed; provide the Animal Control Division with these records; and notify the Animal Control Division when any of the dogs die. 5. All dogs kept on the site shall be owned by the applicants or person(s) residing on the property. Boarding of dogs owned by others shall not be permitted. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ JUNE 27, 2002 ■ PAGE 15 ■ 6. Prior to issuance of the Use Permit, the blue tarps covering the pens shall be replaced with wood or other material, such as fiberglass, that has a natural or neutral color. The type and color of the covering shall be approved by the Planning Division. 7. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 8. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. Environmental Health Division 9. Obtain a permit to operate a kennel from Butte County Health Department, Animal Control Division. The kennel permit shall be obtained from the Animal Control Division within 30 days of the issuance of the Use Permit. All conditions required by the Animal Control Division shall be implemented prior to issuance of the kennel permit. 10. A sewage disposal system for the animal wastes shall be installed under permit from the . Environmental Health Division obtained prior to issuance of the Use Permit. Fire Department 11. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and maintained continuously thereafter. 12. Provide an all weather access to all structures. The access shall have a minimum 10 foot width and 15 foot vertical clearance, and be able to accommodate a 40,000 pound fire apparatus. Public Works Department 13. Prior to the issuance of building permits obtain encroachment permit for all new or existing driveway approaches and construct them to County standards, as specified in County Improvement Standards. County Counsel 14. If this entire matter or any finding, action or condition of this matter is appealed to the Board of Supervisors, the applicant or any other developer/operator other than the applicant agrees to indemnify the County of Butte from liability or loss related to the approval of this project and agrees to sign an indemnification agreement in a form approved by County Counsel before the Board's appeal hearing. There is a 10 -day appeal period on all decisions with the Clerk of the Board _ ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ JUNE 27, 2002 ■ PAGE 16 ■ • Spoor, Cheryl From: Betts, Steve Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:27 AM To: Spoor, Cheryl Subject: RE: SEHRT Status 49 1 Page 1 of 1 The Use Permit has -not been issued because several conditions of project approval have not been completed. The applicant is still working on it — we received a letter from her several weeks ago regarding her on-going efforts to meet the conditions. I haven't given her a new date yet to comply with the conditions —1 need to talk to Joe and Yvonne about it. Since she has paid the bill in full I don't think there is anything else you can do. We cannot charge anything after the Planning Commission approval, so there should not be any additional billing (although there will be a little bit of additional work for us to do on it). I hope this answers your question. If not, please let me know. -S- ----- Original Message ----- From: Spoor, Cheryl Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:26 PM To: Betts, Steve Subject: RE: SEHRT - Status Steve, what is the status? Cheryl -----Original Message ----- From: Spoor, Cheryl Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:26 AM To: Betts, Steve Cc: Thornton, Roneva Subject: SEHRT - Status Steve, I have a fiscal file for Sehrt, UP 02-15 with a note from Roni stating the client had until 7/22/03 to meet the conditions of the Use Permit. At this time, the client has paid the bill in full. Have.they met the conditions? Cheryl 7/31/2003 5/22/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 10:01 AM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 1 Selection Criteria Applicant (hand sel Include: Sehrt UP 02-15 Nickname Sehrt UP 02-15 1 UP 02-15 Full Name Bill to: Lorraine Martin Address 6944 Upper Palermo Road Oroville CA 95966 Phone 1 Phone 2 Phone 3 Phone 4 In Ref To Fees Arrg. By billing value on each slip Expense Arrg. By billing value on each slip Tax Profile Exempt Last bill Last charge 7/6/2002 Last payment 5/21/2003 Amount $243.29 Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 3/2/2002 Diane L. 34.00 2.00 68.00 Billable 38600 C Clerical 3/2/2002 Larry P. 59.00 1.25 73.75 Billable 38659 P Processing 3/30/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.00 59.00 Billable 38973 P Processing 4/13/2002 Steve B. 59.00 4.50 265.50 Billable 39181 P Processing 4/27/2002 Steve B. 59.00 0.75 44.25 Billable 39620 P Processing 5/11/2002 Steve B. 59.00 2.75 162.25. Billable 39604 P Processing 5/25/2002 Steve B. 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 39683 P Processing i 5/22/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 10:02 AM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 2 Sehrt UP 02-15:Bill to: Lorraine Martin (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 6/8/2002 Steve B. 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 39935 P Processing 6/8/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 0.50 22.50 Billable 40041 C Clerical 6/22/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 0.50 22.50 Billable 40201 C Clerical 7/6/2002 Diane L. 34.00 0.50 17.00 Billable 40379 C Clerical NOD 7/6/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 0.50 22.50 Billable 40422 C Clerical TOTAL Billable Fees 15.25 $816.25 Date Employee Price Quantity Amount Total ID Expense Markup % 6/6/2002 Lynn R. 127.04 1.000 127.04 Billable 42662 Publishing Publishing in news paper -O rovi Ile Mercury on 6/6/02 TOTAL Billable Costs $127.04 Calculation of Fees and Costs Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable time slips Total of Fees (Time Charges) Costs Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Amount Total $816.25 $816.25 i 5/22/2003 Butte County Department of De\elopment Services 10:02 AM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 3 Sehrt UP 02-15:Bill to: Lorraine Martin (continued) Amount Total Total of billable expense slips $127.04 Total of Costs (Expense Charges) $127.04 Total new charges $943.29 Accounts Receivables DatellD Type Description 2/25/2002 CRED Deposit - Receipt # ($700.00) 1865 5/21/2003 PAY Payment ($243.29) 2399 Receipt #21185 Total Accounts Receivable ($943.29) New Balance Current $943.29 Unapplied ($943.29) Total New Balance $0.00 Amount to replenish account to $700.00 $700.00 y COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT C3ROVIi LLE, CA RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BAG # 312 ATR NO FATE 63913 $12212003 FUND FUND DEPT DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE ACCT CASH CODE CODE AMC?iJi4iT DEPOSIT DATE- 5-22 RECEIPTS: 21185-21180 PLAG APDL FEES I GENL 00110 4 `I 4210M 109001 3,199.21 Project Number - _ - Amount of Fee t #026-Q70-031 L Seh, z UP 2-15 $243.2 / #079-070-008 Land Ho Prop TPM 03-27 $1,000 MA7-710-001 Schuster Homs TSM Q3='.01 $1,954,92 LAND DEVELOPMENT GENL 0010 440004 45117W 101001 350.00 Project Number Amount of Fee #071-07Q-008 Land Ho Prop TPM 03-27 $350 . EWl ONMENTAL HLTH E'alrNL =0 54=3 4694501 101001 604.50 Project Number Amount of Fee #071-070-008 Land Ho Prop TPM 03-27 $604.50 FIRE PLNG APDL FEE FIRE PROTECT 0100 4517240. MOW 129.00 Project Number Amount of Fee #'071-070-008 Land Ho Prop TPM 03-27 $129 !]OWMENTIC®PY SALES GENL 0010 1 44Gi Oi 4711910 101001 15.00 TOTAL $ 4,296471 APPROVED BY:. RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER white= -treasurer pink --auditor canzry=depositor golden road@e JI RECEIPT JOURNAL o•Te . . - - w n. ...ao eni� ¢,um ' nne vro:ee oTH:11—CHT �2i/o3 a� i� Z�f3,z f jy z j U✓�oz _•o s � o �/✓ �21r03 2I18(0 2.0S 35U'0Lppp o U04 So" kzl.00 Land fin +� r} ' 090- oog i ��e T�Pw� c23z 513 c ,� '# l 01 y 5 I X11$ 5 w S'i a2n A4 M4 <'u4,7I,- /�I/o3 a U g8 95N• ! Ani i I t i j COUNTY OF BUTTE OFFICE OF PLANNING W] 0 Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services Administration - AR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538.7601 Telephone Use Permit Applicant: Lorraine M. Sehrt o 6944 Upper Palermo Oroville, CA 95966 n v Flle: UP.02-15 APN: 026-070-031 Date: May 14, 2003 L INVOICE UP 02.15 Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice, the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing progl There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program, and are not refle on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed, will receive a FINAL INVOICE. The following charges have been applied to the processing of your application: CONDITIONS NEED TO BE MET ON THIS APPLICATION TO FINALIZE Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees; deposits; billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to < amount equal to 25% of the original deposit, no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit, or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event tt applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application, the application will be denied. checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address. J you have any questions, please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE cs May 28, 2003 $ 243.29 KAFISCAL ADMIMBILLING LETTERS\SENT BILLINGS1051403 Inv Sehrt UP 02-15.xis Professional Planner $ 590:00 Mapping 73.75`. Clerical 152.50 Publishing 127.04 TOTAL CHARGES: $ 943.29'. The following payments have been applied to your application: Deposit Disbursement: Deposit Date: February 25, 2002 Environmental Health $185.00 Receipt: 20269 Land Development $150.00 Total Payment $1,078.00 CDF/Fire Department $43.00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING DEPOSIT $ 700.00 The costs thus far in processing your application have exceeded the deposited/paid amount by: $ 943.29 Deposit Date: 7/8/2002 NOD/NOE FILING FEE $25.00 Receipt: 20638 TOTAL PLANNING FEES DUE $ 243.29 CONDITIONS NEED TO BE MET ON THIS APPLICATION TO FINALIZE Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees; deposits; billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to < amount equal to 25% of the original deposit, no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit, or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event tt applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application, the application will be denied. checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address. J you have any questions, please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE cs May 28, 2003 $ 243.29 KAFISCAL ADMIMBILLING LETTERS\SENT BILLINGS1051403 Inv Sehrt UP 02-15.xis Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services Administration - AR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538.7601 Telephone Use Permit Applicant: Lorraine M. Sehrt -6944 Upper Palermo Road Oroville, CA 95966 File: UP 02-15 APN:026-070-031 Date: -May 14, 2003 I INVOICE UP 02.15 Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice, the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing progl There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program, and are not refle on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed, will receive a FINAL INVOICE. The following charges have been applied to the processing of your application: Professional Planner $ 590.00 Mapping 73.75 Clerical 152,50 Publishing 127.04 TOTAL CHARGES: '$ 943.29 The following payments have been applied to your application: Deposit Disbursement: Deposit Date: Environmental Health $ s Receipt: Land. Development $ — Total Payment CDF/Fire Department $ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING DEPOSIT $ 700.00 The costs thus far In processing your application have exceeded the deposited/paid amount by: $ 943.29 Deposit Date: 7/8/2002 NOD/NOE FILING FEE $25.00 Receipt: 20638 TOTAL PLANNING FEES DUE $ 243.29 CONDITIONS NEED TO BE MET ON THIS APPLICATION TO FINALIZE Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees; deposits; billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to amount equal to 25% of the original deposit, no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit, or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event tl applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application, the application will be denied. Make checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address. Should you have any questions, please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE May'28, 2003 243.29 K TISCAL ADMIN\BILLING LETTERS\SENT BILLINGS\051403 Inv Sehrt UP 02-15.xls 5/14/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 10:52 AM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 1 Selection Criteria Applicant (handsel Include: Sehrt UP 02-15 V� Nickname Full Name Address Phone 1 Phone 3 In Ref To Fees Arrg. Expense Arrg Tax Profile Last bill Last charge Last payment Sehrt UP 02-15 1 UP 02-15 Lorraine Sehrt 6944 Upper Palermo Road Oroville CA 95966 Phone 2 Phone 4 By billing value on each slip By billing value on each slip Exempt 7/6/2002 Date Employee ID Task 3/2/2002 Diane L. 38600 C Clerical 3/2/2002 Lary P. 38659 P Processing 3/30/2002 Steve B. 38973 P Processing 4/13/2002 Steve B. 39181 P Processing 4/27/2002 Steve B. 39620 P Processing 5/11/2002 Steve B. 39604 P Processing 5/25/2002 Steve B. 39683 P Processing rofs-4 p1 ., , 7 0e�' �-j le. 2� lop Amount $0.00 Rate Hours Amotot — Total Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 34.00 2.00 68.00 Billable 59.00 1.25 73.75 Billable 59.00 1.00 59.00' Billable 59.00 4.50 � 0 Billable 59.00 0.75 X44.25-- Billable 59.00 2.75 16225 Billable 59.00 0.50 �29.50r Billable 5/14/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 10:52 AM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 2 Sehrt UP 02-151orraine Sehrt (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt. - 6/8/2002 Steve B. 59.00 0.50 .29:50 Billable 39935 P ' Processing 6/8/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 0.50 /2250 Billable . 40041 C Clerical 6/22/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 0.50 02.50 Billable 40201 C Clerical 7/6/2002 Diane L. 34.00 0.50 X17.00 Billable 40379 C Clerical NOD 7/6/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 0.50 22.50- Billable 40422 C Clerical TOTAL Billable Fees 15.25 $816.25 Date Employee Price Quantity Amount Total ID Expense Markup 6/6/2002 Lynn R. 127.04 1.000 127.04 Billable 42662 Publishing G \% Publishing in news paper -O rovi Ile Mercury on 6/6/02 - TOTAL Billable Costs $127.04 Calculation of Fees and Costs Amount Total Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable time slips $816.25 Total of Fees (Time Charges) $816.25 5/14/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 10:52 AM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 3 Sehrt UP 02-15:Lorraine Sehrt (continued) Amount Total Costs Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable expense slips $127.04 Total of Costs (Expense Charges) $127.04 Total new charges $943.29 Accounts Receivables DatellD Type Description 2/25/2002 CRED Deposit - Receipt # ($700.00) 1865 Total Accounts Receivable ($700.00) New Balance Current $943.29 Unapplied ($700.00) Total New Balance $243.29 Amount to replenish account to $700.00 $700.00 COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURERS RECEIPT OROVILLE, CA 7-Y 02103 TOTAL $ 310.00 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUOITOR--CO LLER TREASURER By: i By white=treasurer pink --auditor canary --depositor golden rod=file ATR NO 45613 RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BAG # 312 DATE 711012002 FUND FUND dEPT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: 7-10 RECEIPTS: 20638-20639 PLANNING APPL FEES GENL 0010 480001 4210900 101001 350.00 ENVIRONMENTAL HLTH GENL 0010 540003 4614901 101001 92.00 Project Number Amount of Fee MUP 03-02 P Alaimo Jr #027-04x-055 $92 NODINOE CLERK'S FILING FE GENL 0010 470001 4612319 101001 25.00 (M) Project Number Amount of Fee UP 02-15 LSehrt#025-070-03 $25 FIRE PLNG APPL FEE FIRE PROTECT 0100 4617240 101001 43.00 Project Number Amount of Fee MUP 03-02 P Alaimo Jr #027-04x055 $43 7-Y 02103 TOTAL $ 310.00 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUOITOR--CO LLER TREASURER By: i By white=treasurer pink --auditor canary --depositor golden rod=file ENV. RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC LAFCO PLANNING SALES HEALTH FIRE DATE N0, RECEIVED WORKS OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM OTHER RECEIPT 20638 40 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 20269 ISSUED BY v Now- DATE RECEIPT NO. TOTAL RECEIVED PUBLIC WORKS LAFCO PLANNING PUBLIC SALES ENV. HEALTH FIRE NOF/NOD FIG FEE OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 20269 ISSUED BY v �+ �+ A JL JL16 al JLTJLJL/1'I 1 V1' "L' ♦ L' Lvr 1V11'.1 BUT /TIF COUNTY UNIFORM APD APPLICANT: Agent information teyrovided is on other side: APP S NAME( If applicant is different from owner an.af iidavit is required) e� r ADDRESS: TY CI, STATE & ZIP CODE: q� e/-4 ?zmo NAME OF PRO ( ED PROJECT ( If any ) LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross streets and Address, if any ) 141 7rJim V 11,L' KATION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: DaG — D 90— 03( FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) 57 TELEPHONE GENERAL ixFo RMA ON TI REQUIRED FR'S NAME ,TELEPHONE CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: y ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE (m Square Feet or Acres ) EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feu) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) a8) -e 6 y, (Check One) (Check One) D PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED O PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER 1W PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC a PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION REQUESTED - O GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT O REZONE 0 USE PERMIT O MINOR USE PERMIT O VARIANCE O MINOR VARIANCE O ADMINISTRATIVE PERIkF— G DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT O TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP U E C U E� E O TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP O WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP F E B 2 5 2002 0 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION BUTTE COUNTY IO CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ANNING DIVISION SING AND RECLAMATION PLAN O OTHER ;:{.. ,.t.n PROJECT DESCRIPTION >� _ FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and size of parcels.) 15&z— 4T?v�� fizs� ....... ..: CER'MCATION •_'<�'::� ` . I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY FURTHER I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY' THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE MFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to he authorised, execute an affidavit of authorisation and include the affidavit with this application.) DATE: 31 �C� p a SIGNATURE: L , / AGENT AUTHORIZATW To Butte County, Department of Development Services; Print Name of Agent and Phone Number is hereby authorized to process this on my property, ident>,edatte Court sensor Parcel Number This authorization allnts 'on for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary sing, but not including documents) relating to record tide interest. Owners) of Record: (nt name) Print Name Signature and/or Engineer: Print Name of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: 9SB O� Print Name Signature Total Amount Received: / 0 7 8 AP Number(s) Legal Description Owners Authorization Zoning Requirements Project Description Taken by Receipt No. Copies of plot plan Dib % E.H. AS -LD plan O FD 4/3 Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $ 1079 as of _ 9-x-77 Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". DECEE WE COUNTY OF BUTT ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FEB 2 5 2002 (To be Completed By Project Applican ) BUTTE COUNTY _General Information: Date Filed PLANNING DIVISION 1 • Name ,nd address of owner, n���_developer, and/or project sponsor: J /Yt J 2. Address of project: v Assessor's Parcel Number: P_ 1 G� - 3/ 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: :53D i n c S el- _- - 6 9 q q Lt P � - (D ca- � � r rVIC) 12 � C t1 S 7 5 a OrovS lIQ 4• List and describe any other related permits and other public a r those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: approvals 4 required for this project, including 5. Existing general plan designation:_ Maa s• Existing zoning district:9- u LT u 7. How is land currently used?" 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Project Description: 9. Site size: 9 s" Feet) (Acres/Sq. 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: '' Compact: Total: I 11. Plans attached Yes -No _ 12. Proposed development schedule rLl o M c 13. Associated projects T -I u 0 c- 14. 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development iJ(3N\ C Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 1 6 facilities, and comfnity benefits to be derived from the projef 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit Are the following items applicable to the project or its.effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. _ 23 Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _ l 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. _ 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. _ �C J 0 Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division ❑ 2 f ` t Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one - family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set- back, rear yard. etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signatur "for K:\FORMS\SUBMITTAL\ENV-INFO O Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O 3 � a , J � • USE PERMIT APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their application packet. Please include this checklist along with your submittal. Applicant Planner 1 • El 1 A completed, signed, Uniform Application and Environmental Information form. If the application is signed by an agent for the property owner, an agent authorization form must be submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. 2. 131Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of the deposit will be returned upon final action, if any remains.) (Planner advises applicant) 3• 13 Thirty-five(35) copies of plans which shall include a detailed site plan drawn to scale. All plans shall be drawn on uniform size sheets no greater than 24" x 36". The finished plans shall be folded to 8 %z" x 11 V. The detailed site plan must include: a• El Name and address of Applicant, Engineer and/or person who prepared the plan b• 11 �Property lines and lot dimensions c• El 11 ----Assessor Parcel Number(s) and the street address. d• D 1 Proposed use and/or uses of the property. e. Proposed landscaping plan, if applicable. f: E3 D�"Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvements on the property (including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, parking areas, wells, septic tanks and leach fields). 9-0 E' Distances from any significant natural and constructed features of thero e p p riy, such as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major tree stands, storm drains, bodies of water, railroads, to the property lines. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WELL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. I • h• ❑ Location of all slope banks, ponds, creeks, buttes, sloughs, rock outcroppings, natural drainage courses, irrigation canals and existing vegetation worthy of consideration for preservation such as oak trees. • ❑ Any existing faults or fractures and geologic hazards. �• ❑ E.7 North arrow and scale of drawing. All plans shall be drawn to an engineering scale with the preferred scale of 1" = 20', with a north arrow preferably oriented ofshept. k. ❑ Er ---All plans must be clear and legible. One copy of 8 %2" x 11 transpare cy eduction of the detailed site plan. 5 • 'E]---- .1:3"A vicinity map showing closest major cross streets, zoning and existing 1 and use. 6. ❑ One (1) set of colored plans mounted on foam boards, which shall include an illustrative site plan, illustrative building elevations, and any necessary cross -s ions. Portions of this requirement may be waived by the Planning Manager. Po ' waved ❑ YES ❑ NO 7• ❑ One (1) full size reproducible sepia for each sh in the plan set of the detailed siteP lan. 8 • ❑ ❑ Buil 'ng materials on a sample boar , %2" X 11 ". 9 • ❑ ❑ Detailed s e planincludin a following: a• ❑ ❑ Building s acks from the ultimate road right-of-wayfront rear, ( ,sides). b • D ❑ Pr osed and ex ting on-site driveways and/or roads. c• ❑ Location, height, and terials of walls and fences (sections mayrequired).be d• ❑ All driveways, drawn to sc"e,n adjacent and ar.•�ss the ctr Pt ro rti c within 100 feet of the subject site. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMTI'TED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 2 e• Existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks anxisting paving widths on-site or within -M f. ❑ ❑ g• ❑ ❑ h.. ❑ ❑ I. ❑ ❑ 100 Typical street section(s). Nearest cros;streets both sides with plus or minus distances from subject site. Approximateation of all buildings within 100 feet, on adjacent 11ropertips. I method of sewer and water connection or alternative method of sewage and potable water supply. and nearest fire hydrants. Access, both pedestrian and vehicular, showing service areas and points of ingress and egress. Internal circulation pattern. Elevation contours, at a minimum per USGS maps. ❑ Illustrative Site Plan The plan should include a graphic scale and north arrow, all proposed and existing improvements, landscape concepts such as earth mounding and meandering walkways, walls, ground cover, trees, shrubs, shadows, paving and other elements as may be necessary to illustrate the site plan. (Dimensions may be excluded from this plan.) 11. Nd ❑ Conceptual Grading Plan i -L A -T- Items to be shown include: a• Natural areas to be preserved. b • 13"' Proposed cut and fill areas in contrasting colors of zipatone pattern. c•[I/Existing and proposed contours within 100 feet of project boundaries. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 3 . /Proposed drainage and flood control facilities. e. / El Erosion control measures (e.g. - slope landscaping). f• Natural drainage. g - Elevations and finished contours. h• OA 13Location of retaining walls drainage channels and existing structures. PI• M Location, elevation and size of proposed building pads. 12 • W# l—Y Illustrative Building Elevations Illustrative building elevations showing all sides of existing and proposed buildings and structures. - Illustrative building elevations means architectural elevations showing typical materials to be used, trees, landscaping and shadows to give the elevations graphic dimension. Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. C Signature• ' Date �� � 5 j App can epresentative a Signature: Planner Receiving Application K:\FORMSOMMITAL\CHECKUS�USEPERMI.FRM Date: r . IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMTITED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 4 026070031000 K:\PROJECTS\UPC\SEHRT\maillistUP021 SEHRT LORRAINE MARY ETAL 5.doc 6944 UPPER, PALERMO RD OROVILLE CA 95966-9001 026070009000 MARTINEZ SANTIAGO G & IRENE S 6910 UPPER PALERMO RD OROVILLE CA 95966 026070013000 GUTIERREZ MIGUEL B & NORMA 6990 UPPER PALERMO RD OROVILLE CA 95966 026070024000 LOPEZ LOURDES S 2531 BOHEMIA AVE OROVILLE CA 95966 026070027000 BERRY BOBBY G & SHARON L 6951A IRWIN AVE OROVILLE. CA 95966 026070010000 CRAIG WILLIAM F & CHRISTINE E 6924 UPPER PALERMO OROVILLE CA 95966 026070021000 MCGILL DENNIS D & MARILYN A 2510 MESSINA AVE PALERMO CA 95968-9711 026070025000 CARRILLO AGUSTIN M. P0BOX 22 PALERMO CA 95968 026070030000 MILLER DONALD L & MARIE B 6964 UPPER PALERMO RD OROVILLE CA 95965 026080073000 027060006000 MOSBY MELVIN JACK & JANIE FAYE CARRILLO JESUS A & OFELIA P 2671 MESSINA AVENUE P 0 BOX 33 PALERMO CA 95968 PALERMO CA 95968 027060070000 027060071000 JONES PETER B MUDRICK LEROY & BONNIE 2715 BOHEMIA AVE 6935 UPPER PALERMO RD OROVILLE CA 95966 OROVILLE CA 95965 027070034000 SHERWOOD DOUGLAS D & HEATHEJ END 2726 BOHEMIA AVE OROVILLE CA 95966 026040018000 HARKINS V E 6890 UPPER PALERMO RD OROVILLE CA 95966 026070011000 RODRIGUEZ HECTOR 0 & ZOILA G 6934 UPPER PALERMO RD OROVILLE CA 95966 026070022000 NELSON STANLEY G & CAROLE M CP 2520 MESSINA AVENUE PALERMO CA 95968 026070026000 WHEELER RONALD J & LENORE J P0BOX 54 PALERMO CA 95968-0054 026070035000 CARRILLO RAFAEL & MARIA P0BOX 93 PALERMO CA 95968 027060049000 BAILEY CALVIN D 7019 UPPER PALERMO RD PALERMO CA 95968 027060072000 GORR PAUL M & LINDA S 16711 MARSH CREEK RD #15 CLAYTON CA 96517 j!jc)-L6 07 D — G(3� 1rs�2i ��2 S p) ip 1. GAW ►v2r.?,-,-z- zD22 D11O N S �� ( ,-ia WZ-\ L'1__ 0 A io25 , '02,(Q Pe -n - DC) —'©O 10-7C) j' GraTz-21=7 S+AaZ.t..) r i i " MEMO TO FIJ E July 22, 2005 Subject: Sehart application for Kennel Use Permit 02-15 The applicant submitted a letter to Carl Durling on May 20, 2005. The letter stated they were reducing the number of dogs, and no longer needed a Use Permit. I visited the project site and confirmed -on May 24, 2005 that the applicant had fewer than 5 dogs. This number is permitted for a residential property. The file was returned to the filing cabinet. Carl Durling Associate Planner FFi !!il!b ii f�FfEffi 3fj+ij if i[.�f stil!l 4f"1fit it i if it titllt S?6 s 2 4 77 J6 A z, CLy/ 2 • • BUTTE COUNTY MAY 2 0 2005 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES , t % r �i_'y! C�2� —r-- � �— �c,eYi-J—�6_C.�rrti�—(e.sZ p _ • 1 1 � �; ,� ��, ,t� Page 1 of 1 Attention Mr. Bettes I am sending this letter in regard to our conversation on the telephone as requested by you. As I mention to you, there was a change in plans to install the septic tank, because I didn't have enough fiances to order it. Since I did have money to start the roof over the kennel, this is where I started, we now have a frame around it and need to add the center boards and fiber glass to finish. I have asked my brother to help me get this project done, so the next time he will be up is 24th of July to sart the center boards, when He is not here then I will do what I can to complete the roof. Now Mr. Bettes, I am holding you to your word that if we started something you will work with us..[ am assuming this is still true. I have asked my employer for more over time and she has okayed it when it comes up, this will help me pay the the materialsthat are needed. the next step will be to cement the kennels,put in the pipes and water fountains... We have already talk to the person who put our septic in and he said when we are ready, he will put this one in too... I am doing the best I can with getting things done as requested, I only have my days off, and limited funds, but it will get done... ps. Mr Bettes, I have informed the SPCA that we now only have 9 Dogs, my Mother's two 15 year old girls pass away. Sincerely Yours Please address all mail to me Lorraine Martin BUTTE COUNTY JUL 10 2003 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES http://us.f803.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?YY=40182 7/8/2003 USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) UP 02-15 PERMIT NO. 026-070-031 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin are hereby granted a Use Permit to establish a private dog kennel for more than five (5) dogs (not including dogs under the age of four months) on APN 026-070-031, subject to the following conditions: Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Use Permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within two years of the date of approval. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid, and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Use Permit has been granted is not established within two years of the receipt of the Permit by the Permittee, the Permit shall become null and void and reapplication pursuant to Section 24-45 (of the Zoning Code) shall be required to establish the use previously granted under the expired Permit unless, 30 days prior to the expiration date, a request for a one-year extension is submitted to the Planning Commission together with sufficient evidence that the time limits for processing development permits under federal or State regulations require time limits which exceed one year. Upon application, and for good cause by the Permittee, at a public hearing pursuant to Section 24-45.25 above, the Planning Commission may extend any time limitation previously made a part of any condition to a Use Permit. 1 5. The terms and conditions of this Permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a Permit. Conditions of Approval: Planning Division:. 1. Mitigation Measure: The project applicant shall pickup solid wastes from the dogs at least once per day and dispose of the wastes in a septic system approved by the Butte County. Environmental Health Division. Timing: The mitigation measure shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel. Monitoring: The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to complaints concerning odors from dog wastes. 2. Mitigation Measure: Prior to issuance of the Use Permit, the project applicant shall prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog waste, which shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Division for approval in conjunction with their review of the septic system. The project applicant shall implement any measures recommended by the Environmental Health Division and Animal Control Division for disposing of the dog waste. Timing: Plans for disposal and recommendations of the Environmental Health Division and Animal Control Division shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel. Monitoring: Building inspectors shall spot check for aspects of the plan that involve improvements to the property. The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to complaints concerning odors. 3. Mitigation Measure: If the Department of Development Services or other County departments receive noise -related complaints regarding the project and the level of noise is in excess of established standards, the applicant shall implement recommendations of the Department of Development Services to reduce the noise impacts. In response to any pattern of noise complaints, the Development Services Department, at the expense of the applicant, shall conduct a noise analysis to establish the compliance of the project with standards in the Noise Element of the General Plan. Currently, the Noise Element establishes that acceptable levels of noise for the project area of up to 60 decibels Ldn or CNEL. If noise levels are in excess of established standards, the project applicant is 2 ot. • required to reduce noise levels through recommendations of the Development Services Department, which may include, but are not limited to, building noise attenuation devices that provide some relief to nearby homes, erecting a sight obscuring fence so that the dogs can't see off the site, placing bark collars on the dogs that bark, or other recommendations. Any implemented recommendations to reduce noise would be subject to Building Permits and other applicable conditions. Timing: The applicant shall implement measures to reduce noise impacts as required by the Department of Development Services as a result of complaints during the operational phase of the project. Monitoring: The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to noise complaints. 4. The Use Permit is limited to a maximum of eight (8) dogs over the age of four (4) months kept on the site. The eleven (11) dogs that are kept by the applicant at the time of the approval of the Use Permit are allowed, and are required to be registered with the Animal Control Division. The existing 11 dogs are allowed until they are reduced in number by attrition. The applicant is required to prepare records of the 11 dogs' name, age, sex, and breed; provide the Animal Control Division with these records; and notify the Animal Control Division when any of the dogs die. 5. All dogs kept on the site shall be owned by the applicants or person(s) residing on the property. Boarding of dogs owned by others shall not be permitted. 6. Prior to issuance of the Use Permit, the blue tarps covering the pens shall be replaced with wood or other material, such as fiberglass, that has a natural or neutral color. The type and color of the covering shall be approved by the Planning Division. 7. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 8. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. Environmental Health Division 9. Obtain a permit to operate a kennel from Butte County Health Department, Animal Control Division. The kennel permit shall be obtained from the Animal Control Division within 30 days of the issuance of the Use Permit. All conditions required by the Animal Control Division shall be implemented prior to issuance of the kennel permit. 10. A sewage disposal system for the animal wastes shall be installed under permit from the Environmental Health Division obtained prior to issuance of the Use Permit. Fire Department 3 I�4 , ; 1: • • 11. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and maintained continuously thereafter. 12. Provide an all weather access to all structures. The access shall have a minimum 10 foot width and 15 foot vertical clearance, and be able to accommodate a 40,000 pound fire apparatus. Public Works Department 13. Prior to the issuance of building permits obtain encroachment permit for all new or existing driveway approaches and construct them to County standards, as specified in County Improvement Standards. County Counsel 14. If this entire matter or any finding, action or condition of this matter is appealed to the Board of Supervisors, the applicant or any other developer/operator other than the applicant agrees to indemnify the County of Butte from liability or loss related to the approval of this project and agrees to sign an indemnification agreement in a form approved by County Counsel before the Board's appeal hearing. If the application is not appealed, this condition is deemed satisfied. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this Use Permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: �rd � �,Orz� Ate, ; p icant NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commissio Chairman cc: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Division Animal Control Division Fire Department/CDF Assessor 0 USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 91 DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) UP 02-15 PERMIT NO. 026-070-031 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin are hereby granted a Use Pen -nit to establish a private dog kennel for more than five (5) dogs (not including dogs under the age of four months) on APN 026-070-031, subject to the following conditions: 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Use Permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within two years of the date of approval. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid, and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. _ - 4. If any use for which a Use Permit has been granted is not established within two years of the receipt of the Permit by the Permittee, the Permit shall become null and void and reapplication pursuant to Section 24-45 (of the Zoning Code) shall be required to establish the use previously granted under the expired Permit unless, 30 days prior to the expiration date, a request for a one-year extension is submitted to the Planning Commission together with sufficient evidence that the time limits for processing development permits under federal or State regulations require time limits which exceed one year. Upon application, and for good cause by the Permittee, at a public hearing pursuant to Section 24-45.25 above, the Planning Commission may extend any time limitation previously made a part of any condition to a Use Permit. 0 • 5. The terms and conditions of this Permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a Permit. Conditions of Approval: Planning Division: Mitigation Measure: The project applicant shall pick up solid wastes from the dogs at least once per day and dispose of the wastes in a septic system approved by the Butte County Environmental Health Division. Timing: The mitigation measure shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel. Monitoring: The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to complaints concerning odors from dog wastes. 2. Mitigation Measure: Prior to issuance of the Use Permit, the project applicant shall prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog waste, which shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Division for approval in conjunction with their review of the septic system. The project applicant shall implement any measures recommended by the Environmental Health Division and Animal Control Division for disposing of the dog waste. Timing: Plans for disposal and recommendations of the Environmental Health Division and Animal Control Division shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel.. Monitoring: Building inspectors shall spot check for aspects of the plan that involve improvements to the property. The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to complaints concerning odors. 3. Mitigation Measure: If the Department of Development Services or other County departments receive noise -related complaints regarding the project and the level of noise is in excess of established standards, the applicant shall implement recommendations of the Department of Development Services to reduce the noise impacts. In response to any pattern of noise complaints, the Development Services Department, at the expense of the applicant, shall conduct a noise analysis to establish the compliance of the project with standards in the Noise Element of the General Plan. Currently, the Noise Element establishes that acceptable levels of noise for the project area of up to 60 decibels Ldn or CNEL. If noise levels are in excess of established standards, the project applicant is 2 0 0 required to reduce noise levels through recommendations of the Development Services Department, which may include, but are not limited to, building noise attenuation devices that provide some relief to nearby homes, erecting a sight obscuring fence so that the dogs can't see off the site, placing bark collars on the dogs that bark, or other recommendations. Any implemented recommendations to reduce noise would be subject to Building Permits and other applicable conditions. Timing: The applicant shall implement measures to reduce noise impacts as required by the Department of Development Services as a result of complaints during the operational phase of the project. Monitoring: The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to noise complaints. 4. The Use Permit is limited to a maximum of eight (8) dogs over the age of four (4) months kept on the site. The eleven (11) dogs that are kept by the applicant at the time of the approval of the Use Permit are allowed, and are required to be registered with the Animal Control Division. The existing 11 dogs are allowed until they are reduced in number by attrition. The applicant is required to prepare records of the 11 dogs' name, age, sex, and breed; provide the Animal Control Division with these records; and notify the Animal Control Division when any of the dogs die. 5. All dogs kept on the site shall be owned by the applicants or person(s) residing on the property. Boarding of dogs owned by others shall not be permitted. 6. Prior to issuance of the Use Permit, the blue tarps covering the pens shall be replaced with wood or other material, such as fiberglass, that has a natural or neutral color. The type and color of the covering shall be approved by the Planning Division. 7. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 8. Applicant must also comply with a.l.l other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. Environmental Health Division 9. Obtain a permit to operate a kennel from Butte County Health Department, Animal Control Division. The kennel permit shall be obtained from the Animal Control Division within 30 days of the issuance of the Use Permit. All conditions required by the Animal Control Division shall be implemented prior to issuance of the kennel permit. 10. A sewage disposal system for the animal wastes shall be installed under permit from the Environmental Health Division obtained prior to issuance of the Use Permit. Fire Department 3 0- • 11. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and maintained continuously thereafter. 12. Provide an all weather access to all structures. The access shall have a minimum 10 foot width and 15 foot vertical clearance, and be able to accommodate a 40,000 pound fire apparatus. Public Works Department 13. Prior to the issuance of building permits obtain encroachment permit for all new or existing driveway approaches and construct them to County standards, as specified in County Improvement Standards. County Counsel 14. If this entire matter or any finding, action or condition of this matter is appealed to the Board of Supervisors, the applicant or any other developer/operator other than the applicant agrees to indemnify the County of Butte from liability or loss related to the approval of this project and agrees to sign an indemnification agreement in a form approved by County Counsel before the Board's appeal hearing. If the application is not appealed, this condition is deemed satisfied. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this Use Permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. /I Dated: *,ppcant NOTE: Issuance of this .Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. cc: Butte County Planning Commission Ch irman Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Division Animal Control Division Fire Department/CDF Assessor M • LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY >�- PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 FAX TRANSMISSION To: •WIQXiw► 2�.Qeln Fax #: 534-y2y From: Subject: Additional Comments: Date: 1.l (S 10Z Pages: Ig- Hard Copy will follow: yes no 256' . - ---- 10'x10' KENNELS �S Lo __►,P�' Q� 11 � 5' 122'- 15' 9 SHED-\ DOG PE 7.5'x 25' DECK DOG PENS-1'-� 1 28'x64' SHED -11 A/ HOUSE 50' 38 WELL IP❑WER 110' QP❑LE 3 M. > GAS R ca 152'-1—� 4 UPPER PALERMO ROAD _ 1 26' 104' SCALE: 1'= 60' D ECE"E rlu F E B 2 5 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PANNING DIVISION LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD A.P.N. 026-070-031 DRAWN BY: DATE: J. B. 1/20/02 256' - -- —.. 104' SCALE: 1'= 60' 10'x1-0�' �KENNELS I�L,L, J -I I i �S _►.ate Q¢ 11 un 122" ' 5' 1 15' ---- --_—_ - ----- _. 9Y . SHED Il❑G PEN 7.5'x 25' DECK DOG PENS1� 28'x64' sHED�ic HOUSE 5::::�_ O' 38 WELL 1110' ¢ �/ PULE 3 •n, cy A 0✓- METER 4 UPPER PALERMO ROAD ® ECEME F E B 2 5 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD A.P:N. 026-070-031 DRAWN BY: DATE: J.B. 1/20/02 -256'- 1 26' 10'x10' KENNELS Ln 122" ' 5' 1 15' 9' SHED-\ Il❑G PEN 7.5'x 25' DECK DOG PENS—�� 28'x64' SHEDIf,b HOUSE W---738 E] WELL I POWER 110' QPOLE 3 � w > GAS a o✓—ME1�R 152' — 4 UPPER PALERMO ROAD 104' SCALE: 1'= 60' ® ECE"E F E B 2 5 .2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD A.P.N. 026-070-031 DRAWN BY: DATE: J. B. 1 /20/02 0 V- N 256' 10'x10' KENNELS 5 122'i 9' SHED DOG PE 7.5'x 25' o DECK- DOG ECK D❑G PENS�,r'--�� ��� 28'x64' SHED- A/C H❑USE 50' 38 WELL 1 26' 104' SCALE: 1'= 60' ® ECEL WE F E B 2 5 2002 I POWER BUTTE COUNTY 110, a POLE PLANNING DIVISION > GAS o✓-ME1�R ra 0. 152- LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD 4 , A.P.N. 026-070-031 UPPER PALERMO ROAD DRAWN BY: DATE: _ J.B. 1/20/02 Nw 256' 104' SCALE: 1'= 60' 10'x10' KENNELS o �S Ln _.►.P� el 11 122" ' 5' I 1S 9� SHED-\ DOG PE 7.5'x 25' 1 Ei DECK DOG PENS -� 28'x64' E C O U E SHE A/C H❑USE 50' - 38' WELL FEB 2 5 2002 POWER BUTTE COUNTY POLE PLANNING DIVISION 3 ten, W > GAS a R i52' = LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD 4 A.P.N. 026-070-031 UPPER PALERMO ROAD DRAWN BY: DATE: _ :, J.B. 1/20/02 0 Lo 5 �SH 7.5'x 25' DOG PENS1 SHED 256' 1 26' 0 o e 4 104' SCALE: 1'= 60' 10'x10' KENNELS 0811 DOG PE j� 28' X' 64' HOUSE 0' 38 WELL v r. IP❑WER 110' Q �P❑LE 3 •o., GAS > o�-ME11=R A 152' 4 UPPER PALERMO ROAD DEC EE0 WE F E B 2 5 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD A.P.N. 026=070-031 DRAWN BY: DATE: J.B. 1/20/02 0 et 7.5'x 25' DOG PENS SHE: is 256' 1 26' 10'xl�O''��--KENNELS I -I -L-^L go- = 22'' J 1.o.1J 115' OJ 104' r� SCALE: 1'= 60' un DOG PEN DECK 28'x64' HOUSE - 0' —38 WELL I POWER 110' a POLE 3 •n, > GAS a �✓-METER 152' 4 UPPER PALERMO ROAD ® EcEowE - F E B 2 5 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD A.P.N. 026-070-031 DRAWN BY: DATE: J.B. 1/20/02 256' ------ 4 26' 10'x10' KENNELS �S tn _►,P�' el 11 In 51 11 ,122' gill 104' SCALE: 1'= 60' SHED—\ DOG PE 7.5'x 25' DECK DOG PENS 28'x64' FFEB SHE �Aic HOUSE— � � E 50' 8—I El -J, WELL. 5 2002 1 POWER 110 ¢P❑LE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION Dc •n. > GAS ca o✓—METER 152' -o- LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD 4 A.P.N. 026-070-031 UPPER PALERMO ROAD DRAWN BY: DATE: J.B. 1/20/02 256' 104' SCALE: 1'= 60' 10'x10' KENNELS Lo o \ S in 122, ' 013 SHED-\ DOG PE 7,5'x 25' ❑ DECK DOG PENS �. 88'x64' SHED q/C HOUSE 50' 38 WELL R FEB 2 52002 1110, >- /I POLE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION A. o��MET�R 152 = LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD 4 A.P.N. 026-070-031 UPPER PALERMO ROAD DRAWN BY: DATE: J.B. 1/20/02 256' 1 26' 10'x10' KENNELS v Lo Lo P� 122' 5' 115r-- ,� --- 771 SHED-\ DOG PE �\ 7.5'x 25' DECK DOG PENS�� 28'x64' SHED-iAic_ HOUSE 01 '--3 8 WELL IP❑WER a POLE 110' 104' , r= SCALE: 1'= 60' D E C E WE F E B 2 5 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION 3 •n� . o��MET�R ca 152'--¢- LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD 4 A.P.N. 026-070-031 ------------------------------------------- UPPER PALERMO ROAD DRAWN BY: DATE: J.B. 1/20/02 256' 10'x10' KENNELS 115' ' 122'1 5 9' 1 SHED-\ 'DOG PE 7.5'x 25' qj DECK DOG PENS�� 28'x64' SHED- A/ HOUSE 5-A 0' WELL 5 v R 104' SCALE: 1'= 60' D ECE�VE F E 8 2.5 2002 BUTTE COUNTY 110' ¢ VULL PLANNING DIVISION 3 � w ��- METER a 152' LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD 4 , A.P.N. 026-070-031 UPPER PALERMO ROAD DRAWN BY: DATE: _ J.B. 1/20/02 0 Lo 7.5'x 25' DOG PENS SHE: 256'.. - - - 10'x10' KENNELS 115' i dLn T 122,1 r 5' � 15' Ole DOG ]`— 28'x64' _ HOUSE 0' 38 WELL I POWER 110, a POLE 3 � > GAS ✓-ME R A 152' — 4, UPPER PALERMO ROAD 1 26' 104' SCALE: 1'= 60' ® EC -EWE F E B 2 5 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD A.P.N. 026-070-031 DRAWN BY: DATE: J. B. 1/20/02 256' - - - - 1 26' 104' SCALE: 1'= 60' �1^0'xlO''�K7E-NNELS I J J J ^�J o �S _►,ate Q¢ 11 V) �SH 7.5'x 25' DOG PENS-�. i", SHE 9'. D❑G PEN Ei DECK 23'X64' HOUSE 0' 38 WELL I POWER 110, Q X-11 IOLE A METER 152' 152' -- 4, - UPPER PALERMO ROAD a ® E-cEHE FEB 2 5 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD A.P.N. 026-070-031 DRAWN BY: DATE: J.B. 1/20/02 0 Lo 256' 26' 10'x10' KENNELS I 11 ' 22 ally SHED-\ DOG PE 7.5'x 25' DECK DOG PENS��r'—°� 28'x64' SHED-L�Aic HOUSE 50' 38'---a WELL F E B- 2 5 2002 I POWER BUTTE COUNTY 110, }¢P❑LE PLANNING DIVISION 3 •n, > GAS a R 152' -o- LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD 4 A.P.N. 026-070-031 UPPER PALERMO ROAD DRAWN BY: DATE: J.B. 1/20/02 104' SCALE: 1'= 60' :4 - in ® E-cEowE 5 256' 104' SCALE: 1'= 60' 10'x10' KENNELS Lo Q �S Lo 122' 5' � 15' ---- —... _ 9 SHED DOG PE 7.5'x 25' i DECK DOG PENS�� D-1 28'x64 ' E c E 0 w E SHE A/C HOUSE 50' 38' WELLF E B 2 5 2002 1 POWER BUTTE COUNTY 11 O, a POLE PLANNING DIVISION 3 j GAS R ca 152'-�= LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD 4 A.P.N. 026-070-031 UPPER PALERMO ROAD DRAWN BY: DATE: J.B. 1/20/02 January 31, 2003 Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin 6944 Upper Palermo Road Oroville, CA 95966 Eutte, Count D O F N AT U R A L W EA L T H A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Re: Use Permit for Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin on APN 026-070-031, File # UP 02-15 Dear Ms. Sehrt and Ms. Martin: Thank you for meeting with me on January 22, 2003, to discuss the conditions of project approval for your Use Permit. I want to remind you again that you have not been issued the Use Permit because the conditions of project approval have not been complied with. Because the Use Permit has not been issued to you, the kennel use on your property is considered an illegal, non -conforming use. However, since you were confused on the amount of time you had to complete the conditions of approval, we are willing to give you additional time for compliance. As we discussed at the meeting, I gave you six (6) months to complete the conditions of project approval, which is July 22, 2003. This should be adequate time to comply with the conditions. If the conditions of approval have not been accomplished by then, the Planning Commission could revoke the Use Permit and code enforcement action taken to remove the dog kennel on your property. The green tarp that you placed over the dog kennels to help keep rain off of the dogs is considered a temporary measure because a condition of project approval requires some type of solid roof over the kennels. Since you intend to relocate the kennels slightly to the east, the green tarp is approved until the kennels are relocated. Should you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at 538-7153. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner • DECLARATION OF FEES DUE • (California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Lorraine M. Sehrt Lorraine Martin 6944 Upper Palermo Road Oroville, CA 95966 FILING NO. Project Title/file number: UP 02-15, USE PERMIT CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION () A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee (X) B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED �O A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary'Handling Fee JUL i i 20 () B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee LAND J. GRUBS $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee �Y TEC nFpERK 3. () OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT / NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). #20638 2. () NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: M. A. Meleka Title: Principal Planner Lead Agency: Butte CountyDepartment of . Development Services Date: July 15, 2002 TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. K:\P lanning\P ROJECTS\UPC\S EHRT\nod.wpd • NOTICE OF DETERMINATION• TO: _ Office of Plan.& Research Dept. 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 X Butte County Clerk FROM: Butte County Planning 7 County Center Dr., Oroville 95965 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: UP 02-15, Use Permit AP Number: 026-070-031 Applicant: Lorraine M. Sehrt & Lorraine Martin, 6944 Upper Palermo Road, Oroville, CA 95966 State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to clearinghouse): Contact Person: Stephen Betts Telephone Number: 538-7601 Project Location: on the west side of Upper Palermo Rd., midway between Bohemia Ave. and Messina Ave., Palermo Project Description: Use Permit for a private dog kennel This is to advise that the Butte County Planning Commission has approved the above-described project on June 27, 2002, and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1. The project will, X will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures X were,, were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations was, X was not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at: Date received for filing and posting at OPR Butte County Department of De elopment Services 7 County Cente ive Oroville, C4 99 M. A. Meleka Principal Planne Mitigation Measures: 0 L] Mitigation Measure: The project applicant shall pick up solid wastes from the dogs at least once per day and dispose of the wastes in a septic system approved by the Butte County Environmental Health Division. Timing: The mitigation measure shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel. Monitoring: The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to complaints concerning odors from dog wastes. 2. Mitigation Measure: Prior to issuance of the Use Permit, the project applicant shall Prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog .waste, which shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Division for approval in conjunction with their review of the septic system. The project applicant shall implement any measures recommended by the Environmental Health Division and Animal Control Division for disposing of the dog waste. Timing: Plans for disposal and recommendations of the Environmental Health Division and Animal Control Division shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel. Monitoring: Building inspectors shall spot check for aspects of the plan that involve improvements to the property. The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to complaints concerning odors. V 3. Mitigation Measure: If the Department of Development Services or other County departments receive noise -related complaints regarding the project and the level of noise is in excess of established standards, the applicant shall implement recommendations of the Department of Development Services to reduce the noise impacts. In response to any pattern of noise complaints, the Development Services Department, at the expense of the applicant, shall conduct a noise analysis to establish the compliance of the project with standards in the Noise Element of the General Plan. Currently, the Noise Element establishes that acceptable levels of noise for the project area of up to 60 decibels Ldn or CNEL. If noise levels are in excess of established standards, the project applicant is required to reduce noise levels through recommendations of the Development Services Department, which may include, but are not limited to, building noise attenuation devices that provide some relief to nearby homes, erecting a sight obscuring fence so that the dogs can't see off the site, placing bark collars on the dogs that bark, or other recommendations. Any implemented recommendations to reduce noise would be subject to Building Permits and other applicable conditions. Timing: The applicant shall implement measures to reduce noise impacts as required by the Department of Development Services as a result of complaints during the. operational phase of the project. Monitoring: The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to noise complaints. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FILING FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding (Fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4; Section 753.5c, Title 14, California Code of Regulations) Project Title / Butte County Location: UP 02-15, on the west side of Upper Palermo Rd., midway between Bohemia Ave. and Messina Ave., Palermo Project Description: Use Permit for a private dog kennel Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The County of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a (Negative Declaration or Enviornmental Impact) so as to evaluate the potential of this project for adverse environmental impact: 2. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence before the County that the project will have potential for an adverse impact on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. 3. The County of Butte has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5 (d), of Title 14, California Code of Regulations, if applicable. 4. The project is hereby found to be de minimis in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the State Fish and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. Certification: I hereby certify that the County of Butte has made the above findings of fact and that based upon the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. By M. Pri Lead Agency: County of Butte Date: July 15, 2002 COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROVILLE, CA RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BAG # 312 R ATR NO 45613 DATE .7M 012002 FUND FUND IEPT '% ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: 740 RECEIPTS: 20638-M PLANNING APPL FEES GENL 0010 480001 4210900 101001 350.00 ENVIRONMENTAL HLTH GENL 0010 540003 4614901 101001 92.00 Project Number Amount of Fee MUP 03-02 P Alaimo Jr #027-04i;-055 $92 NOD/NOE CLERK'S FILING FE GENL 0010 470001 4612319 101001 25.00 ($25) Project Number Amount of Fee UP 02-15 L Sehrt #023-070-03' $25 FiRE PLNG APPL FEE FIRE PROTECT 0100 4617240 101001 43.00 Project Number Amount of Fee MUP 03-02 P Alaimo Jr #027-04x05'5 $43 FY 02103 TOTAL $ 310.00 APPROVED BY: AUDITOR -CO LLER By: i RECEIVED BY: TREASURER BY white=treasurer pink --auditor canary --depositor golden rod=file DATE RECEIPT NO. TOTAL PUBLIC RECEIVED WORKS ENV. PUBLIC FIRE LAFCO PLANNING SALES HEALTH OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING � 1 APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM RECEIPT 20638 0 0 COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROVILLE, CA RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BAG # 312 l� ATR NO 43613 DATE 711012002 FUND FUND dt'PT '% ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: 7-10 RECEIPTS: 2068-M PLANNING APPL FEES GENL 0010 480001 4210900 101001 ENVIRONMENTAL HLTH GENL 0010 540003 4614901 101001 Project Number Amount of Fee MUP 03-02 P Alaimo Jr *327-0Q,055 $92 NODINOE CLERKS FILING FE GENL 0010 470001 4612319 101001 (S25) Project Number Amount of Fee UP 02-15 L Sehrt #023-070-03! $25 FIRE: PLNG APPL FEE FIRE PROTECT 0100 Project Number MUP 03-02 P Alaimo Jr #027-040`055 FY 02!03 350.00 92.00 i 25.00 4617240 101001 43.00 Amount of Fee S43 TOTAL $ 310.00 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR -CO KIRI TREASURER ey: B Z3 white=treasurer pink --auditor canary --depositor golden rod, file �I ®� PUBLIC ENV. RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC LAFCO PLANNING SALES HEALTH DATE NO. RECEIVED WORKS FIRE I jk/NO.Dj OTHER I APPLICANT OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIVED FROM RECEIPT 20638 E • (SPACE FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE In The Matter Of Revised Notice of Public Hearing. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION State of California SS. County of Butte The undersigned resident of the county of Butte, State of California, says: That I am, and at all time herein mentioned n was a citizen of the United States and not a party to nor interested in the above entitled matter; that I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of The Chico Enterprise -Record The Oroville Mercury -Register That said newspaper is one of general circula- tion as defined by Section 6000 Government Code of the State of California, Case No. 26796 by the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Butte; that said newspa- per at all times herein mentioned was printed and published daily in the City of Chico and County of Butte; that the notice of which the annexed is a true printed copy, was published in said newspaper on the following days: June 11, 02. Dated July 9, 2002. at Chico, California. I_� l UANDQ� (Signat ) = Boa I 1 •�a h_ •i sem. Notice is" by , the Bd PIan,,,ng .! that public be •held, of 2002, m.the WBoard-of ooni Cbw tration Cenl ty Ceriter D California, regarding l item. : 1 , , In scco the Califo lf mental • ;, � a ed. , a+ eleven:( be allow ty Code than fivi age of fc kept• ori for any: ever. I the dol dog wastes posed.gf kl tem The apl be requiredd sewage dis. fr6m, the`:EI Heal.kYkl eithet,rinsi existirig,se� for asecon tern; The; aF also 'requ, permit fron mentalHe ment's'-k Division ion.fc ing dogs., Thi zoned;Ala; Residentis parcel0.4 on the:.;! Upper R midway IBohemia, Messina. for,anyy.reason w atso- eyencSolid wastes from the "dogsare currently • • j picked up every.morning " ;? and tinned on-site; how., aver,Lthe Butte County :tntvironmental., Health -f)epertment requires the wastes: to. be Ais- j posed,pJn:a septic sys- tQm::The applicant would le ' bebired,to obtain a sewage disposal permit from the Environmental alth;bepartment for er n ad 'j— to.ttie stl�ng septic system br fo�a,�eoondseptic sys- terty^ e;eppli" would pogW:pjne>_ roperty; is ,zoed AR -.1 Agricultural Rd ential 1 ,nacre ,parcels)�and is located i9u��l thew we§tx side' � of pQ,ranPalermo.,Road, mi ayy , r between I�omia Avenue, ,Me�sina', Ayenue,: at 6B44Y lipp"per Palermo Road tPalermo APN 06 070 031. (SB). (UP emdlalatudy, for prQjei f,y idevilifies pofttUlly sigrnficant eft��cts�but revisions in , ahe�totect plans or pro posa(sYmade bye, or. agr, ed io°Qtiy` the appli= ;c{trnwould avoid..the' e ectsor,in�dgate';'tlie ?efftt§;o;a'poinf;wFiere deadyMr!'. , ;significant effeotsj� would occur.: I Ch refore; Planning Div SIO �►Staff:-is recom endl # a-,: Mingato Declaration: , aH a nitial, Study; and I Plop sed:;:::Mitigated Ne$g Vo -.,Declaration for 9 pn actre on.fie for "„;ig�,review starting, Ju W6; 2002, . through ?June'„2fi; 2002: at the .aawnot*vuu�uys riannmg Dhiisin; 7 County Can - et p�nve Orovilia Cali- fQm S>II Interested per c°„n,ar�s invited e.to ,.'. revie,�>�they.documnt: . iVSitfera }comments. will E+'e a`"ccQgqted, by....thi leieh'(ng Division at the a�addr-:; is fityo..u•challenessw>ge either ithfdit��eted. Negative .beciaratiori br, the'Use �rrnd to court yqu may. i8 tm�ted46jaismg only ath as{,!$$Uek1 )ou., or, so ...eo ' else `raised, at healing ;des�beii"it,Jrhis notice, o`r�3fn vvrttten coaespon- . d"" ,,,ca�defivered io the P1j►n�tg Dlvisron at` or :prgg�0,,r4,tthe.public or r�FMrfurther information regarding this project, pplea "'contact.Stephan B.' p 'moo get I . ji„) • p aniier; at ,fhBFue'County Plan- ivision; at lAtf R`II41i�; IRECTOR OF :D , ENTSERVICES Puti>#i: June 11, 2002 rI June 28, 2002 Lorraine M. Sehrt (Martin) 6944 Upper Palermo Road Oroville, CA 95966 Re: Use Permit, AP 026-070-031, UP 02-15 Dear Ms. Sehrt: B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held June 27, 2002, your request for a Use Permit for a private dog kennel, was approved subject to the conditions listed on the enclosures. Should you desire to appeal any of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, you must do so in writing, to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to 5:00 p.m., Monday, 4uly 8, 2002. The appeal fee of $50.00 must be paid at that time. If you do not appeal and if there are no other appeal within the 10 calendar -day appeal period, the action of the Planning Commission is final. A Notice of Determination (NOD) should be filed for purpose of completing the California environmental quality Act requirements. The fee for filing the NOD is a $25.00 document handling fee. A check made payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $25.00 should be submitted to the Planning Division in order to complete the process. Please sign both copies of the Use Permit and return them to this Division. You must sign the Use Permit within thirty (30) days of the expiration of the appeal period. Both signed copies must be received, by this Division, within forty (40) days from approval of the permit by the Planning Commission. The Use Permit is deemed granted when the enclosures have been signed by the applicant, with the counter signature of the Chairman of the Planning Commission; and said permit is received by the applicant by certified mail. Pursuant to Section 66020 (d) (2) of the Government Code you are hereby notified that you have 90 days to register a protest challenging any fees, dedications, reservations, or exactions imposed as conditions of approval for this project. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Craig Sanders at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support.Service Assistant /lr k Aforms\approvup. frm COUNTY.OF BUTTE OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE E1 �'�� Ca d� g'Q'� i ,'�'P� S «� ](41E * r OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 $ Etjr / ETca U. S. P09T.r RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED - } PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE- YrYr .rrrrYrY .0 Q. I l�f to �7 1 SSV13 tsdii u11aosM I 4 i � ` ._ e �'. -- � • � .� 1 . � � - � . • 4 1 . ` {/( f .' _ l , - _ ' '... .'1. i � ' Y. 'e�Y.�]'T.,��?-� �,J•,�. , .1-1 1'ry r •i.1�`� �.4n ti f i t .y����• T ':*�. '� ti '� •� .i �i 1 i - ` ._ ` . -- � {� 1 1 . t f .' _ l , i - ` ._ ` . -- � _ . • 1 0 Leroy&Bonnie Mudrick 6935 Upper Palermo Rd. Oroville , Ca 95966 Dear Loran June 18, 2002 We have been neighbors for five years and is very good neighbors too. You have showed us4 your beautiful dogs and we can tell that you love them very much. These dogs are very healthy looking, they are in several kennels that is kept clean and always has fresh water and food at all times. These dogs are exercised daily in her large backyard. We never hear the dogs bark and there is no noise from your backyard. The only noises we do hear are rosters crowing and dogs barking in the hills behind use. Thank You for Good Neighbors; Leroy & Bonnie Mudrick aL_ 0 0 (OL COUNTY OF BUTTE OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE l A� S r �l L g �j 026070022000 EY G & CAROLE M CP NELSON S I INA AVENUE D EGEHE JUN. 1 3 2002 BUTTE COUNTY �. PLANNING DIVISION AN�w 2520 MESS , p',�LERMO CA 95968 I, z4 68OU.S. P08TAQE NELSS20'k 959682043 1402 27 06/10/02 RETURN TO SENDER NELSON 89 HIGHLANDS BLVD OROVILLE CA 95966-3646 RETURN TO SENDER lilall!(li,il�,!l11till 111111111 i.tt. l i. tt ii t!i t fl t t t idtlSt _IT'1'1i��// ' j �•' /�' l�f'7�"� lA��l�li As oil N VIS ? cum Owl am Mon, SION, AM Ja- 42 MKIWO 4'li;--- I Ll%`JAM Ali! vow, Jl ii .. I P. 716 AN - 11 IFIMS ! ME ld' 9 vi 6utte Count L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 ' June 17, 2002 Lorraine M. Sehrt (Martin) 6944 Upper Palermo Road Oroville, CA 95966 Re: Use Permit, AP 026-070-031, UP 02-15 Dear Ms. Sehrt: Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Use Permit for a private dog kennel on the west side of Upper Palermo Rd., midway between Bohemia Ave. and Messina Ave., Palermo. Should you have any concerns with the report or conditions of approval, please contact us in advance of the meeting so that we may work together to resolve your concerns. A public hearing has been set for June 27, 2002, at 9:30 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts of this office at 538-7601, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant Enc. cc: j:\wpdocs\pc1ts\schedu1e.mrg 'lfvC'lT N 13�6i aft* kR� 1pr� ohl-C "A 0 • Area view looking to the northwest ':. a'a shy-, r '2*., •YIYw. Area view looking to the southwest � . �= • . rs–.- rl�i ♦ - - -�.• - `fir �4 �-������ � •it hili l� Re• /`` � �. '-'•"'77 y�•�J •`f `1' • ,.l• ..', l.M\yam 2.� • ii" ! f j;r e • . • Jv7 v .. •'a —t ` o' �. • � .���,i� �. . �, � f� • � � �, a �♦ �7�,,. 1 : `0 _ "f`"'+--�• •�I•• t � - - . ..-�+f+,,?•V � sI +r13'�'�..7a.-a= rw• � 1,J1 1� � DD- --Zn * �<�? ;. Mir 71 y{�e,r•.r.e��� • q� f4_ •4 Imo.- s • +.}....f..i.♦S js •A tp•y r i+�..� �•IN••'••~'•l..�i'r ��� •.� J ° " '`�S�Gf�.'s..*n.sl�'M'fr¢!'AJ' - ?��T► }NNN` ' i .. J!t y ! f..el ' � �y. i `[''•�►!► rr j .,. i�'�!'T•` � �� .• a sus• � 4 _ � .��G'� a � r/ � J 1`• �. � `rte►• :IAt...: 4" ♦ .0 oy.. ] ! t • • AST -20 wry i S :..: t���'•'�' !1 ri: v4. i • r a' �" �� f'� � ..'rl'I C:`�Y �j� `b`• +♦ P'/ri��. w 1 S ?4T_ w— f '!_��%�,+'- .wy _1..' ''� R`i: L., ,_firIrv, Aerial view of project site 10 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT - JUNE 279 2002 Applicant: Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Location: On the west side of Upper Martin Palermo Road, at 6944 Upper Palermo Road, midway File #: UP 02-15 between Bohemia Avenue and Messina Avenue, Request: Use Permit to allow a private Palermo dog kennel for up to eleven (11) dogs that are owned .by Parcel Size: 1.9 acres the applicants. No dogs owned by others would be Planner: Stephen Betts boarded. Supervisor G.P.: Agricultural Residential District: 1 Zoning: AR -1 (Agricultural Residential, Attachments: 1 -acre minimum parcel size) A. Site Pictures B. Initial Study APN: 026-070-031 C. Site Plan SUMMARY: Staff recommends approval of this project subject to the findings and conditions contained herein. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The applicants are requesting a Use Permit to allow a private dog kennel for up to eleven (11) dogs. The Use Permit would allow the keeping of the applicant's personal dogs; no dogs owned by others would be boarded. (Note: Butte County Code allows no more than five dogs over the age of four months to be kept on a single parcel for any reason whatsoever [Butte County Code Section 24-305.260]; more than this number is considered to be a kennel, even if all the dogs are owned by the parcel owner/resident). Most of the dogs on the site are strays that the applicants have taken in. The applicants stated that all the dogs they have taken in are spayed or neutered. Several of the dogs are very old. Solid wastes from the dogs are currently picked up every morning and buried on-site; however, the Butte County Environmental Health Division requires the dog wastes to be disposed of in a septic system. The applicant would be required to either enlarge the existing septic system or install a second septic system. The applicant would also require a kennel permit from the Public Health Department's Animal Control Division. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE I ■ 0 1 0 The project site is developed with a single family dwelling, septic system, a well, pens for goats and waterfowl, and dog pens. The applicant keeps goats and waterfowl on the property. The applicant currently has a total of eleven dogs on the property: eight in the outside pens and three in the applicants' house. The dog pens are located towards the rear of the parcel, approximately 370 feet from Upper Palermo Road, and consist of chain link material with plywood floors. Heavy-duty plastic tarps cover the tops of the pens. A dog house is located in each dog pen. The project is located in an area with low-density residential development, orchards, and grazing land. Surrounding uses include dwellings, cattle and goat grazing, horses, and. olive orchards. The nearest off-site dwelling units are located approximated 275 to 300 feet away, with the next closest dwelling located approximately 350 feet away. The project site and the surrounding parcels are not subject to a California Land Conservation Act agreement ("Williamson Act"). The site is not located within a 100 -year flood zone or an airport land use compatibility zone. The site is level and does not contain any drainages or swales. Vegetation on the site consists of non-native trees and bushes around the dwelling, young fruit trees, several old olive trees, and large open areas of grasses. Odors from the various farm animals on the site are very noticeable to the west of the dwelling, where farm animals are kept. Some of the odors on the site may also be emanating from the goats, cows, and horses kept on the surrounding parcels. Odors from the dogs were detectable when within ten feet or so of the kennels. The project site is surrounded by olive orchards, grazing fields, low-density residential uses, and undeveloped property. Zoning on parcels to the north, south, and west is AR -1 (Agricultural Residential, one acre minimum parcel size). Parcels to the east, across Upper Palermo Road, are zoned AR -2V2. ANALYSIS: General Plan and Zoning: The General Plan land use designation of the project site is Low -Density Residential. The proposed project is located in an area zoned AR -1 for agricultural residential uses on parcels of one acre or more in size. The proposal would establish a kennel in a low-density residential and agricultural area, which is permitted by issuance of a Use Permit. The nearest dwellings are located approximately 275 to 300 feet to the east of the kennels. The proposed project site is buffered not only by distance, but also by trees between the proposed site and the nearest residence. For the approval of the Use Permit, the applicant is required to present information, including plans or other information that is sufficient to allow the Planning Commission to make an informed decision. The Planning Commission may grant a Use Permit if: "The proposed uses of property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with, or injurious to, surrounding properties or detrimental to the health and general ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 2 0 C� welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or the general health, welfare, and safety of the residents of the county" (Butte County Code, Section 24- 45.10). ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: The project was reviewed for environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with State Law. The following discussion summarizes those issues and impacts identified in an Initial Study. Air Qualit An increase in odors on-site would be expected as a result of the keeping of eleven dogs. The nearest off-site dwellings are approximately 275 to 300 feet from the dog pens - a significant enough distance to allow the odors to dissipate. Goats and waterfowl are kept on the site; horses, cows, and goats are kept on several of the surrounding parcels. The odors from these animals would tend to mask or mix in any odors from the dogs. The project site is located in an agricultural area where the sensitivity to such odors is relatively less than would be the case in a residential neighborhood, park, commercial district, or other sensitive use. The applicant proposes to install several small commercially -made pet waste disposal systems in the ground. However, the Butte County Environmental Health Division requires either the installation of a small septic system that would exclusively handle wastes from the dogs or an expansion of the existing septic system to handle the dog wastes. Solid wastes from the dogs may create objectionable odors if not properly disposed of in a timely manner. Mitigation measures are proposed that would require the applicant to pick up all solid dog wastes at least once a day and to dispose of the wastes in a County -approved septic system. Hydrology/Water Quality Solid wastes from the dogs kept on the site have the potential to impact water quality. Solid wastes from the dogs are required to be picked up at least once per day and disposed of in an on- site septic system. The County Environmental Health Division requires either. the installation of a new septic system to handle the solid wastes from the dogs or the expansion of the existing septic system. Use of a septic system for disposal of dog wastes would not cause a significant decrease in water quality provided the septic system functions as designed. On June 3, 2002, the applicants obtained a sewage disposal permit from the Environmental Health Division for a 750 gallon septic tank and 100 feet of leach line. Noise The project site is located in an agricultural area that is subject to noise generated by agricultural activities. Additional noise is generated by vehicle traffic on Upper Palermo Road. The project would create additional noise in the area by allowing the keeping of eleven dogs. During staff's site visit on April 23, 2002, the dogs were quiet until staff approached the pens, at which point 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 3 0 the dogs started barking. The applicant stated that the dogs usually bark only at strangers or wild animals. The nearest residential dwellings to the proposed project site are located approximately 275 to 300 feet away, one of which is buffered by trees. Other residences are located over 350 feet away. Since distance from a source of noise has an attenuating effect — for every doubling of distance, the level of sound decreases by approximately six decibels — noise levels at nearby homes from barking dogs can be expected to range from 55 to 70 decibels when the dogs are agitated. The 24-hour equivalent noise level associated with the dogs depends on the frequency by which they are disturbed, the time of day at which they are agitated, and their temperament. Given the agricultural zoning and character of the area, the sensitivity to noise impacts in this area is relatively lower than other more populated parts of the county. A mitigation measure is included in the Initial Study and as a condition to the issuance of a Use Permit, which addresses any noise -related impact. With this condition, if the Department of Development Services or other County departments receive noise -related complaints regarding the project and the level of noise is in excess of established standards, the applicant would be required to implement recommendations of the Department of Development Services to reduce the noise impacts. If noise levels in the area are excessive, the Planning Commission will consider revocation of the Use Permit. Other Issues In order to help reduce future impacts caused by the dogs, the Use Permit is limited to a maximum of eight total dogs on the site. The eleven dogs that are currently kept by the applicant would be allowed, and would be required to be registered with the Animal Control Division. The existing eleven dogs would be allowed until they are reduced in number by attrition. The applicant would be required to prepare records of the eleven dogs' name, age, sex, and breed; provide the Animal Control Division with these records; and notify the Animal Control Division when any of the dogs die. It would be possible to move the existing dog kennels further back on the project site (to the west). This would place the kennels further away from the two closest off-site dwellings, which may reduce potential noise impacts to the residents of these dwellings. Doing so may result in less control of the dogs by the applicants due to the longer distance between the kennels and the house. The Planning Commission may wish to consider requiring the kennels to be relocated further to the west. Blue tarps currently cover the tops of the dog pens, which while not a significant aesthetic impact, are nonetheless not very aesthetically pleasing. As already mentioned above, the applicant intends to cover the pens with wood, which would not stand out as much as the blue tarps and would be more aesthetically pleasing. A condition is recommended that requires the applicant replace the blue tarps with a wood roof, or other material that is of a subdued, natural or neutral color. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 4 ■ ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: I. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study identified significant environmental effects and includes mitigation measures that would mitigate such effects below significant levels; a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. B. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. C. On the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study and any comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the Use Permit for Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin, Planning Division File No. UP 02-15, will have a significant effect on the environment. D. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. E. The project will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a "de minimus" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d) (3) and 14 CCR 753.5, is not required. II. Approve Use Permit 02-15 for Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin, subject to the following findings and the conditions in Exhibit "A": A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: .R Conditions of approval have been applied to this project after CEQA review. The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Low Density Residential. The Low Density Residential land use designation allows animal husbandry as a Secondary Use. The AR -1 zone allows kennels with approval of a Use Permit. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 5 0 • • B. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use would be compatible with, and would not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: 1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed project will involve minor improvements to the property including a septic system to handle the dog waste that will be required to comply with County Improvement Standards. Otherwise, no changes to buildings or density are proposed. 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities No additional services are needed to accommodate this project. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The nearest residential dwellings are located approximately 275 feet from the site of the dog kennel. The proposed project site is buffered not only by distance but also by trees between the proposed site and the nearest residence. Various farm animals are kept on surrounding and nearby properties, and as such the proposal would not adversely affect neighborhood character as long as the conditions specified in the Initial Study and in Exhibit A are followed. 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or proposed development: The site is suited for the project because the property is located in a predominantly agricultural and low-density residential area and because the proposed use is allowed with the issuance of a Use Permit. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed kennel application to County agencies and has received responses that indicated there is no evidence that the use, with appropriate conditions, would cause any other relevant planning -related impact. The project would require a kennel permit from the Animal Control Division of the Public Health Department. The findings and criteria for this type of permit are different than the findings and criteria for the Use Permit. If this Use Permit is approved, its approval does not preclude the Animal Control Division from denying the kennel permit. The planning -related impacts of this project appear to be minor in general, assuming all conditions are dutifully executed. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 6 0 • Cl C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. k:\projects\upc\sehrt\sehrt planning commission agenda report.doc 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 7 0 IWIVI8r: USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION • DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) UP 02-15 PERMIT NO. 026-070-031 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin are hereby granted a Use Permit to establish a private dog kennel for more than five (5) dogs (not including dogs under the age of four months) on APN 026-070-031, subject to the following conditions: 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Use Permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within two years of the date of approval. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid, and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Use Permit has been granted is not established within two years of the receipt of the Permit by the Permittee, the Permit shall become null and void and reapplication pursuant to Section 24-45 (of the Zoning Code) shall be required to establish the use previously granted under the expired Permit unless, 30 days prior to the expiration date, a request for a one-year extension is submitted to the Planning Commission together with sufficient evidence that the time limits for processing development permits under federal or State regulations require time limits which exceed one year. Upon application, and for good cause by the Permittee, at a public hearing 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 8 0 pursuant to Section 24-45.25 above, the Planning Commission may extend any time limitation previously made a part of any condition to a Use Permit. 5. The terms and conditions of this Permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a Permit. Conditions of Approval: Planning Division: 1. Mitigation Measure: The project applicant shall pick up solid wastes from the dogs at least once per day and dispose of the wastes in a septic system approved by the Butte County Environmental Health Division. Timing: The mitigation measure shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel. Monitoring: The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to complaints concerning odors from dog wastes. 2. Mitigation Measure: Prior to issuance of the Use Permit, the project applicant shall prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog waste, which shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Division for approval in conjunction with their review of the septic system. The project applicant shall implement any measures recommended by the Environmental Health Division and Animal Control Division for disposing of the dog waste. Timing: Plans for disposal and recommendations of the Environmental Health Division and Animal Control Division shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel. Monitoring: Building inspectors shall spot check for aspects of the plan that involve improvements to the property. The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to complaints concerning odors. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 9 0 3. Mitigation Measure: If the Department of Development Services or other County departments receive noise -related complaints regarding the project and the level of noise is in excess of established standards, the applicant shall implement recommendations of the Department of Development Services to reduce the noise impacts. In response to any pattern of noise complaints, the Development Services Department, at the expense of the applicant, shall conduct a noise analysis to establish the compliance of the project with standards in the Noise Element of the General Plan. Currently, the Noise Element establishes that acceptable levels of noise for the project area of up to 60 decibels Ldn or CNEL. If noise levels are in excess of established standards, the project applicant is required to reduce noise levels through recommendations of the Development Services Department, which may include, but are not limited to, building noise attenuation devices that provide some relief to nearby homes, erecting a sight obscuring fence so that the dogs can't see off the site, placing bark collars on the dogs that bark, or other recommendations. Any implemented recommendations to reduce noise would be subject to Building Permits and other applicable conditions. Timing: The applicant shall implement measures to reduce noise impacts as required by the Department of Development Services as a result of complaints during the operational phase of the project. Monitoring: The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to noise complaints. 4. The Use Permit is limited to a maximum of eight (8) dogs over the age of four (4) months kept on the site. The eleven (11) dogs that are kept by the applicant at the time of the approval of the Use Permit are allowed, and are required to be registered with the Animal Control Division. The existing 11 dogs are allowed until they are reduced in number by attrition. The applicant is required to.prepare records of the 11 dogs' name, age, sex, and breed; provide the Animal Control Division with these records; and notify the Animal Control Division when any of the dogs die. All dogs kept on the site shall be owned by the applicants or person(s) residing on the property. Boarding of dogs owned by others shall not be permitted. 6. Prior to issuance of the Use Permit, the blue tarps covering the pens shall be replaced with wood or other material, such as fiberglass, that has a natural or neutral color. The type and color of the covering shall be approved by the Planning Division. 7. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 8. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 10 ■ Environmental Health Division 9. Obtain a permit to operate a kennel from Butte County Health Department, Animal Control Division. The kennel permit shall be obtained from the Animal Control Division within 30 days of the issuance of the Use Permit. All conditions required by the Animal Control Division shall be implemented prior to issuance of the kennel permit. 10. A sewage disposal system for the animal wastes shall be installed under permit from the Environmental Health Division obtained prior to issuance of the Use Permit. Fire Department 11. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code.4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and maintained continuously thereafter. 12. Provide an all weather access to all structures. The access shall have a minimum 10 foot width and 15 foot vertical clearance, and be able to accommodate a 40,000 pound fire apparatus. Public Works Department 13. Prior to the issuance of building permits obtain encroachment permit for all new or existing driveway approaches and construct them to County standards, as specified in County Improvement Standards. County Counsel 14. If this entire matter or any finding, action or condition of this matter is appealed to the Board of Supervisors, the applicant or any other developer/operator other than the applicant agrees to indemnify the County of Butte from liability or loss related to the approval of this project and agrees to sign an indemnification agreement in a form approved by County Counsel before the Board's appeal hearing. NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman cc: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Division Animal Control Division Fire Department/CDF Assessor ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 11 ■ wreip w 7 < 6 boo a ........... AR -5 ANT"', ht AP: -OWN f 10 inn ti +A'A 77? -J QW, lit AM X M C Ole Pro'ect Location m 7 < 6 boo a ........... 10 inn ti +A'A -J Z { a �a104 �s P 0. �/ Atex. itw aw.+.•. ._.-_ �� rth Will I�Tti�=1 U ^ 700 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 4200 4900 Feet BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COIVIlVUSSION Applicant- Lorraine M. Sehrt (Martin) Owner: Same T Hearing Date: June 27, 2002 @ 9:30 a.m. Existing Zone: AR- 1 (Agricul tund, Residential, 1; acre min.) N Supervisorial Request: Use Permit to allow a private dog kennel.. District # 1 Assessor Parcel No: 026-070-031 Me: UP 02-15 :•• _ 1 FV ' FV , :r � �jJ�F.�31r1aidfii:�A S•yq..vw.. °rr°����r1) ��k• �IE#41w:� K3iltt�9 son �w y ! � �3E� rlf� 4 -el Sim all min US MIS ■ e f soon f'. r 9111111�t • i1i9�1 b � r In MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION To: Memo for Record From: Steve Betts '!-�& Subject: Sehrt/Martin Use Permit, File # UP 02-15, APN 026-070-031 Date: June 11, 2002 The initial study for the above referenced project reflected that the eight (8) dogs would be kept on the on project site. This number was obtained from one of the applicants during my site visit of April 23, 2002. However, after the initial study was completed, it was discovered from Animal Control staff, with confirmation from the other applicant, that the project site would have a total of eleven (11) dogs on the site. This is the number of dogs currently kept on the site. In light of the new number of dogs, staff reviewed the Initial Study to determine if the additional three dogs would require any changes in the Initial Study. It was determined that the impacts of eight dogs would be the same as eleven dogs, and that the recommended mitigation measures contained in the Initial Study would be adequate. A revised public notice indicating that the project has eleven dogs was mailed to surrounding and nearby property landowners. �7_ (SPACE FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE In The Matter Of Notice of Public Hearing. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION State of California SS. County of Butte The undersigned resident of the county of Butte, State of California, says: That I am, and at all time herein mentioned n was a citizen of the United States and not a party to nor interested in the above entitled matter; that I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of The Chico Enterprise -Record The Oroville Mercury -Register That said newspaper is one of general circula- tion as defined by Section 6000 Government Code of the State of California, Case No. 26796 by the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Butte; that said newspa- per at all times herein mentioned was printed and published daily in the City of Chico and County of Butte; that the notice of which the annexed is a true printed copy, was published in said newspaper on the following days: June 6, 02. Dated June 28, 2002. at Chico, California. (Signatur NO. by the, Butt Planning -G that a public h be held' oriN 2002, in the B ty Board of SL Boom County tration Center, tyCenter Drivi alifornia, at. regarding the item. In accords the California mental 0ua (CEQA), an In has been pre the followino.oi PERMIT .*r Lorretne tin), Use ,Pe ,i a private The Use Pa allow the kei applicant's, r dogs; no dog others woulc ed. A maxim (8) dogs':t' allowed. By Code: allow; than five dol age of four m kept,on a sii for anyy reasi ever. Solid'w the doas an land dog wai posed of tem. The berequi sewage from the Health I either ar existing ; for a sec tem. The also : iec ment's"An!,Ti Division fo[,ti ing of • more; dogs. The p zoned AR -1' (� Residential parcels) and. on 'the west Upper Palen midway Bohemia AV( 'Messina Av 6944 Upper - Road, Palen 026.070.031; pt on a smgie arcei •.arrtyry �x�eason w atso- e Solid wastes from a�dogs.are currently Ced'.up.every morning idtuiietl"on-site; how- :ert,utta County vfr"oriment81. Health jpi rtii ent requires the ig vVasfes to be dis- ised'of;in a septic rSys- . licant would ,..fl ireguire , to obtain a Waagge disposal permit �riti'they Environmental @81 1?MDepartmant for tflerq`addition to the ng;septic.systam or rA second septic sys- m;e';applicant would sore±qu re".a kennel p�tn rorEtha Environ- ent >1Nealth Depart- ettf's Ariroal Control e I�is.'lon::fot ttie kennel• gotijiore_ahan five tgsSTtie;' "'roperty_ i; i ed+'R=1': Agricultura Ets*i`entiah, 1 acre ircel's) iand'is locatec WNW.— est : stde of p `ear �Patermo Road, between Dhe4ilia;"Avenue and eSSln9r�'°Avenue, , at 1L44Uppper .Palermo D16mo: APN khe%~initial study for e4 pr&ct•'• identifies i�ential Sri put,. ans or,pro- an��'�woula: avoid the !> . iffects ;or,;'.mitigate the fli cts to i -point when 16a no- signifi iftects„���:would ocbYir . rherefore', Planning' 3iv�QIAV 6k.is recom-; neing:t a :...Mitigated 4eggatiW.Declaration. • fielrtitial Study and ?rop' sed; F:;: Mitigated 46O.W ve'Declaration for fns�'ro'`'ject are on file for )utii4c1_ ieview. starting, Iune�'6'.'.2002 through lune�'26,' 2002; at the 36t6County' Planning )iv sion, 7 County .Cen- e�xpnvQ Oroville, Cali ornWAI mteiested"per >ons� are ;.,invited' to r , •eview We"" document. Nrilfen comments will ,. eIITIppted by ,the Planning;D,ivision at,the �bo e`address.: ' flt you challenge either'. ti9Mifitive Di3Claratiott,or the Use P�erint'imcourt, you may 4e1mit" t" raising only ltibse? i's`sues you or someone :else raised at Ih,' jiubltc . hearing de -in this notice, n ..,; . orin..wFittencorrespon- de�ice'�delivered to the Plepriing-Division at, or P[igr to;, the public hear- •, tturther information regeyrdirig this project, ppled�-ssa'contact Stephen. Betfs",project planner, at ttieButte:County Plan- nirtg` .Division at F530))538-7153. RED DAVIS, . INTERIM' DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES F264772 Publish: June 6, 2002 0 E • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT BUTTE COUNTY INITIAL STUDY AND PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR UP 02-15 (Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin) Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Sehl and Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 t COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY FOR USE PERMIT 02-15 (Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin) 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin B. Staff Contact: Stephen Betts, Senior Planner (530) 538-7153 C. Project Name: N/A D. Proiect Location: On the west side of Upper Palermo Road, at 6944 Upper Palermo Road, midway between Bohemia Avenue and Messina Avenue, Palermo E. Type of Application: Use Permit F. Assessor's Parcel Number: 026-070-031 G. Proiect Site Size: 1.9 acres H. Current Zoning: AR -1 (Agricultural Residential, 1 -acre minimum parcel size) I. General Plan Designation: Agricultural Residential J. Environmental Setting: The project site is developed with a single family dwelling, septic system, well, pens for goats and waterfowl, and dog pens. The applicant keeps goats and waterfowl on the property. The applicant currently has a total of eight dogs on the property, seven of which are kept in the outside pens. The dog pens are located towards the rear of the parcel, approximately 370 feet from Upper Palermo Road, and consist of chain link material with wood floors. Heavy-duty plastic tarps cover the tops of the pens. A dog house is located in each dog pen. The project is located in an area with low-density residential development, orchards, and grazing land. Surrounding uses include dwellings, cattle and goat grazing, horses, and olive orchards. The nearest off- site dwelling units are located approximated 250 feet away, with additional dwellings located over 500 feet away. The project site and the surrounding parcels are not subject to a California Land Conservation Act agreement ("Williamson Act"). The site is not located with a 100 -year flood zone or an airport land use compatibility zone. The site is level. Vegetation on the site consists of non-native trees and bushes around the dwelling, young fruit trees, several old olive trees, and large open areas of grasses. No drainages or swales are located on the site. Odors from the various farm animals on the site are noticeable to the west of the dwelling, where the animals are allowed to roam. Some of the odors noticed on the site may also be emanating from the goats, cows, and horses kept on the surrounding parcels. K. Surrounding Land Uses: The project site is surrounded by olive orchards, grazing fields, low-density residential uses, and undeveloped property. Zoning on parcels to the north, south, and west is AR -1 (Agricultural Residential, one acre minimum parcel size). Parcels to the east, across Upper Palermo Road, are zoned AR -2%. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 1 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 • L. Project Description: The applicant is requesting a Use Permit to allow a private dog kennel. The Use Permit would allow the keeping of the applicant's personal dogs; no dogs owned by others would be boarded. A maximum of eight (8) dogs would be allowed. Four of the dogs were strays rescued by the applicants. (Note: Butte County Code allows no more than five dogs over the age of four months to be kept on a single parcel for any reason whatsoever [Butte County Code Section 24-305.260]; more than this number is considered to be a kennel, even if all the dogs are owned by the parcel owner/resident). The applicants state that they will not take in any additional stray dogs. Solid wastes from the dogs are currently picked up every morning and buried on-site; however, the Butte County Environmental Health Department requires the dog wastes to be disposed of in a septic system. The applicant would be required to obtain a sewage disposal permit from the Environmental Health Department for either an addition to the existing septic system or for a second septic system. The applicant would also require a kennel permit from the Environmental Health Department's Animal Control Division for the kenneling of more than five dogs. M. Public Agency Approvals: Butte County Development Services Department, Butte County Environmental Health Division, Butte County Animal Control, Butte County Public Works Department, Butte County Fire Department, and Butte County Air Quality Management District. 2.0 DETERMINATION [ ] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [X] I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [ ] I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. [ ] I fmd that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared by:. SV*ljbn Betts, Senior Planner Reviewed by: M. IA. Meleka, Principal Planner sly%oa Date 2 - Date ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 2 ■ 10 Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Sehr and Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 3.0 POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS CHECKLIST SETTING A. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [ ] 4.1 Aesthetics [ ] 4.2 Agriculture Resources [X] 4.3 Air Quality [ ] 4.4 Biological Resources [ ] 4.5 Cultural Resources [ ] 4.6 Geologic Processes [ ] 4.7 Hazards/Hazardous Material [ ] 4.8 Hydrology/Water Quality [ ] 4.9 Land Use [ ] 4.10 Mineral Resources [X] 4.11 Noise [ ] 4.12 Housing [ ] 4.13 Public Services [ ] 4.14 Recreation [ ] 4.15 Transportation/Traffic [ ] 4.16 Utilities/Service Systems [X] 4.17 Mandatory Findings of Significance B. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact' answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards, (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on a project -specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) "Reviewed Under Previous Document." Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 3 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 0 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 4.1 AESTHETIC/VISUAL RESOURCES: Impact Discussion: The project would allow the keeping of eight dogs in an area surrounded by agricultural residential properties, some of which involve small-scale animal husbandry and orchards. The dog pens consist of chain link material with blue tarps on top to provide shelter and shade. The applicant intends to replace the tarps with wood roofs. The existing kennel is screened from Upper Palermo Road by the house on the site. The dog pens appear to be an extension of the existing goat and waterfowl pens that are adjacent to the dog pens. The dog pens can be easily seen from the dwelling on the parcel to the north of the site, but the long distance (approximately 250 feet) reduces the impact to a less than significant level. There is a large amount of intervening vegetation that helps to shield the view of the dog pens from the house on the parcel to the south of the site, which is also approximately 250 feet from the dog pens. No substantial additional lighting is anticipated as a part of the project. Considering the existing uses that surround the dog pens and the agricultural character of the project area, no substantial conflicts with the established character or function of the area are anticipated. This project would not significantly impact a scenic vista. The impact is considered less than significant. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 4 ■ Less Than Reviewed Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic X buildings within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views X in the area? Impact Discussion: The project would allow the keeping of eight dogs in an area surrounded by agricultural residential properties, some of which involve small-scale animal husbandry and orchards. The dog pens consist of chain link material with blue tarps on top to provide shelter and shade. The applicant intends to replace the tarps with wood roofs. The existing kennel is screened from Upper Palermo Road by the house on the site. The dog pens appear to be an extension of the existing goat and waterfowl pens that are adjacent to the dog pens. The dog pens can be easily seen from the dwelling on the parcel to the north of the site, but the long distance (approximately 250 feet) reduces the impact to a less than significant level. There is a large amount of intervening vegetation that helps to shield the view of the dog pens from the house on the parcel to the south of the site, which is also approximately 250 feet from the dog pens. No substantial additional lighting is anticipated as a part of the project. Considering the existing uses that surround the dog pens and the agricultural character of the project area, no substantial conflicts with the established character or function of the area are anticipated. This project would not significantly impact a scenic vista. The impact is considered less than significant. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 4 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Sehr 11nd Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 • 4.2 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: Impact Discussion: The project site is located in a rural area that at one time contained many large commercial olive orchards. The applicant keeps goats and waterfowl on the property, but for personal use. Olive orchards are located on several of the surrounding parcels, and cattle are kept on the parcel to the north. The small size of the project parcel, at 1.9 acres, precludes any commercial agricultural operations. The project does not propose to convert any farmland to non-agricultural use and would not have an impact on any agricultural uses. The Butte County Agricultural Commissioner's Office commented that this project does not have any significant agricultural issues. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.3 AIR QUALITY: Less Than Reviewed Would the proposal: Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the Incorporated a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or X Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the X Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the X California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or X a Williamson Act Contract? X c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in X conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? X Impact Discussion: The project site is located in a rural area that at one time contained many large commercial olive orchards. The applicant keeps goats and waterfowl on the property, but for personal use. Olive orchards are located on several of the surrounding parcels, and cattle are kept on the parcel to the north. The small size of the project parcel, at 1.9 acres, precludes any commercial agricultural operations. The project does not propose to convert any farmland to non-agricultural use and would not have an impact on any agricultural uses. The Butte County Agricultural Commissioner's Office commented that this project does not have any significant agricultural issues. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.3 AIR QUALITY: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 5 ■ Less Than Reviewed Would the proposal: Potentially Significant Significant with Less Than Significant No Under Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Previous Document Incorporated a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan9 X b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality X violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient X air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozoneprecursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 5 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Sehland Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 Impact Discussion: Both the California Air Resources Board and the Environmental Protection Agency have established air pollution standards in an effort to protect human health and welfare. Geographic areas are designated "attainment' if these standards are met and "nonattainment' if they are not met. In addition, each agency has several levels of classifications based on severity of the problem. Butte County and all northern Sacramento Valley Air Districts have been designated as "moderate" nonattainment areas for the state standards for ozone (03) and fine particulate matter (PMio). Currently, Butte County is in attainment for all the federal (less stringent) air quality standards. The project will not create fugitive dust, oxides of nitrogen, or reactive organic gases emissions because the dog pens already exist and the only new construction that may occur is the installation of a small septic system or an enlargement of the existing septic system. The installation or expansion will not cause significant fugitive dust or any other type of emissions. An increase in odors on-site would be expected as a result of the keeping of eight dogs. The nearest residential dwellings are approximately 250 feet from the dog pens - a significant enough distance to allow the odors to dissipate. Horses, cows, and goats are kept on several of the surrounding parcels, along with goats and waterfowl on the project site. The odors from these animals would tend to mask any odors from the dogs. The project site is located in an agricultural area where the sensitivity to such odors is relatively less than would be the case in a residential neighborhood, park, commercial district, or other sensitive use. The applicant proposes to install several small commercially -made pet waste disposal systems in the ground. However, the Butte County Environmental Health Division requires either the installation of a small septic system that would exclusively handle wastes from the dogs, or an expansion of the existing septic system to handle dog waste. Solid wastes from the dogs may create objectionable odors if not properly disposed of in a timely manner. Mitigation measures are proposed that would require the applicant to pick up all solid dog wastes at least once a day and to dispose of the wastes in a septic system. With the implementation of the mitigation measures included below, the impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure # 1: The project applicant shall pick up solid wastes from the dogs at least once per day and dispose of the wastes in a septic system approved by the Butte County Environmental Health Division. Timing: The mitigation measure shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel. Monitoring: The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to complaints concerning odors. Mitigation Measure # 2: Prior to issuance of the Use Permit, the project applicant shall prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog waste, which shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Department for approval in conjunction with their review of the septic system. The project applicant shall implement any measures recommended by the Environmental Health Division and Animal Control Division for disposing of the dog waste. Timing: Plans for disposal and recommendations of the Environmental Health Division and Animal Control Division shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel. Monitoring: Building inspectors shall spot check for aspects of the plan that involve improvements to the property. The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to complaints concerning odors. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 6 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Sehr and Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Impact Discussion: The project site consists mostly of grasses, with non-native trees and bushes around the home. Young fruit trees, several old olive trees, and a large expanse of grass are located to the rear of the property. No impact on biological resources is expected. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 7 ■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No Reviewed Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or X regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and X regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 or the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, X vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interni tion, or other means)? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish and wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory X wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree X reservation policy ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation X Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservationplan? g. A reduction in the numbers, a restriction in the range, or an impact to the critical habitat of any unique, rare, X threatened, or endangered species of animals? h. A reduction in the diversity or numbers of animals onsite (including mammals, birds, reptiles, X amphibians, fish or invertebrates)? i. A deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat (for foraging, breeding, roosting, nesting, etc.)? X j. Introduction of barriers to movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species? X k. Introduction of any factors (light, fencing, noise, human presence and/or domestic animals) which could X hinder the normal activities of wildlife? Impact Discussion: The project site consists mostly of grasses, with non-native trees and bushes around the home. Young fruit trees, several old olive trees, and a large expanse of grass are located to the rear of the property. No impact on biological resources is expected. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 7 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Sel and Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 The project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. The proposal would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Mitip,ation Measure: None required. 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES: Impact Discussion: Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic period archaeological sites; historical features, such as rock walls, water ditches and flumes, and cemeteries; and architectural features. Cultural resources consist of any human -made site, object (i.e., artifact), or feature that defines and illuminates our past. Prehistoric resources sites are found in foothill areas, areas with high bluffs, rock outcroppings, areas overlooking deer migratory corridors, or above bodies of water. The project site does not contain any of these characteristics. No cultural resources structures or sites of any type are known to be located on the subject site. The only construction that would occur due to the project is either the installation of a new septic system or an expansion of the existing septic system. Because of the location and the nature of the project, the potential for uncovering or otherwise disturbing cultural resources as a result of project -related activities is unlikely. Mitigation Measures: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 8 ■ Less Than Reviewed Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact p Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? X b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? X c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Impact Discussion: Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic period archaeological sites; historical features, such as rock walls, water ditches and flumes, and cemeteries; and architectural features. Cultural resources consist of any human -made site, object (i.e., artifact), or feature that defines and illuminates our past. Prehistoric resources sites are found in foothill areas, areas with high bluffs, rock outcroppings, areas overlooking deer migratory corridors, or above bodies of water. The project site does not contain any of these characteristics. No cultural resources structures or sites of any type are known to be located on the subject site. The only construction that would occur due to the project is either the installation of a new septic system or an expansion of the existing septic system. Because of the location and the nature of the project, the potential for uncovering or otherwise disturbing cultural resources as a result of project -related activities is unlikely. Mitigation Measures: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 8 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Slit Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 4.6 GEOLOGIC PROCESSES: Impact Discussion: The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake fault zone but is within an aftershock zone. The only known active fault in Butte County is the Cleveland Hill fault, located approximately 4 miles from the project site, where activity on August 1, 1975 resulted in the Oroville earthquake. This earthquake had a Richter magnitude of 5.7 and resulted in approximately 2.2 miles of ground rupture along the western flank of Cleveland Hill. In the northwest corner of Butte County near Chico there are a series of short, north-northwest trending faults similar to the Cleveland Hill fault. These faults appear to be an extension of the Bear Mountain Fault or Foothills Shear Zone. Minor seismic activity has occurred in the area of these short faults; however, other geologic evidence indicates these faults are not active (Butte County General Plan 1977). The Butte County GIS Fault Lines theme shows that an inferred fault is located approximately 2,100 feet to the east of the project site. No impacts are anticipated since no rupture of a known active earthquake fault exists in the project area. The 80 -mile -long Midland-Sweitzer fault is located approximately 50 miles southwest of the project site. This fault is considered active and has caused historic earthquakes of Richter magnitudes between 6 to 6.9 in the area in 1892. There is some speculation as to the exact location of the historic earthquake epicenters and some question if they actually occurred on the Midland-Sweitzer fault (Butte County, 1977). ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 9 ■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No Reviewed Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as X delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? X 3. Seismic -related ground failure, including X liquefaction? 4. Landslides? X b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, X and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1- B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating X substantial risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal X system where sewers are not available for the disposal or wastewater? Impact Discussion: The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake fault zone but is within an aftershock zone. The only known active fault in Butte County is the Cleveland Hill fault, located approximately 4 miles from the project site, where activity on August 1, 1975 resulted in the Oroville earthquake. This earthquake had a Richter magnitude of 5.7 and resulted in approximately 2.2 miles of ground rupture along the western flank of Cleveland Hill. In the northwest corner of Butte County near Chico there are a series of short, north-northwest trending faults similar to the Cleveland Hill fault. These faults appear to be an extension of the Bear Mountain Fault or Foothills Shear Zone. Minor seismic activity has occurred in the area of these short faults; however, other geologic evidence indicates these faults are not active (Butte County General Plan 1977). The Butte County GIS Fault Lines theme shows that an inferred fault is located approximately 2,100 feet to the east of the project site. No impacts are anticipated since no rupture of a known active earthquake fault exists in the project area. The 80 -mile -long Midland-Sweitzer fault is located approximately 50 miles southwest of the project site. This fault is considered active and has caused historic earthquakes of Richter magnitudes between 6 to 6.9 in the area in 1892. There is some speculation as to the exact location of the historic earthquake epicenters and some question if they actually occurred on the Midland-Sweitzer fault (Butte County, 1977). ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 9 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine SehrTand Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 0 Approximately five miles west of Butte County there is a north trending fault system known as the Willows fault. This fault is approximately 40 miles long and displaces Cretaceous sediment in the Sacramento Valley. It does not appear to displace surface sediment and has been mapped principally by geophysical methods. However, there have been enough historical seismic events in the vicinity of this fault to conclude that it should be considered potentially active (Butte County General Plan 1977). A moderate earthquake occurred on the afternoon of Friday, August 10, 2001, centered about nine miles west of Portola, California, and about 50 miles east of the project site. Very little damage occurred as a result of this earthquake, which was had a magnitude of 5.5, but brief groundshaking was felt in Chico during the earthquake and the aftershocks. This earthquake occurred in the Mohawk Valley Fault Zone, and this area of California experiences a magnitude five or higher earthquake approximately every 20 years, according to the University of California, Berkeley Seismological Laboratory. Historical events in the area include the following: Table l Historical Seismic Events near Recent Portola Event Near Portola — Mohawk Valley Fault Zone Year Magnitude Location 1875 6.2 40 km to the NNE near Janesville 1888 6.2 20 km to the SSW near Blairsden 1959 5.6 40 km to the ESE near Verdi 1966 6.0 60 km to the SSE near Truckee Source: Adapted from information provided by the California Division of Mines and Geology and posted on the UC -Berkeley Seismological Laboratory web site (hilp://www.seismo.berkeley.edu/seismo). Like most of central California, the site can be expected to be subjected to seismic ground shaking at some future time. Accordingly, all buildings and other improvements will be designed and installed in accordance with Uniform Building Code requirements. Because the project appears to be located such that the probability of significant groundshaking is low, because the project does not propose the addition of significant structures that would be at risk to seismic activity, and because any structures that are built during the course of the project will be designed and installed in accordance with Uniform Building Code standards for the appropriate Seismic Hazard Zone, potential geologic impacts would be less than significant. The Butte County Seismic Safety Element's Liquefaction Potential Map indicates that the site has a generally low potential for liquefaction. The impact would be less than significant. The Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that there is no potential for landslides in this area. The project involves only the use of property for private kenneling. There is a moderate soil erosion potential for the project site, according to Butte County General Plan GIS data. The project does not involve any activity that would result in significant soil erosion impacts. The Conservation Element's Expansive Soils Map indicates that the project site has a high expansive soil potential. The project involves only the use of property for a private dog kennel. The dog pens are already constructed and any additional structures placed on the site project would be required to comply with applicable portions of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by Butte County, which would mitigate any potential impacts resulting from expansive soils. The Butte County Environmental Health Division did not indicate that the soils on the site would be incapable of handling another septic system on the site or an expansion of the existing septic system. Soils in the area tend to be adequate for septic systems. The site does not contain any drainages or swales, and is not located in a 100 -year flood zone, all of which could preclude the installation of a new septic system or an expansion of the existing septic system. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 10 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Sehr, .nd Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 4.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Impact Discussion: The project site is not located on or near any sources of hazardous materials and would not create any hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. The project site is not known to be listed on any hazardous materials sites lists. The project site is not located within the 65 or 70 CNEL noise contour of any airport, nor is it located in any aircraft overflight area, according to the Butte County General Plan. The California Department of Forestry has submitted conditions which are to be met before approval of the project which would reduce any potential impact regarding fire. Compliance with these measures, which are included in the development application materials, is to be accomplished in coordination with the Butte County Fire Department. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 11 ■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No Reviewed Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact p Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environmental through the routine transport use, or X disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous X materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- X quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, X would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the X project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? L For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people X residing or working in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency X evacuationplan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or X where residences are intermixed with willdlands? Impact Discussion: The project site is not located on or near any sources of hazardous materials and would not create any hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. The project site is not known to be listed on any hazardous materials sites lists. The project site is not located within the 65 or 70 CNEL noise contour of any airport, nor is it located in any aircraft overflight area, according to the Butte County General Plan. The California Department of Forestry has submitted conditions which are to be met before approval of the project which would reduce any potential impact regarding fire. Compliance with these measures, which are included in the development application materials, is to be accomplished in coordination with the Butte County Fire Department. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 11 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Selland Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 • 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Impact Discussion: Solid wastes from the dogs are required to be picked up at least once per day and disposed of in an on-site septic system (see Mitigation Measures # 1 and 2 in Section 4.3). The County Environmental Health Department requires either the installation of a new septic system to handle the solid wastes from the dogs, or the expansion of the existing septic system. Use of a septic system for disposal of dog wastes would not cause a significant decrease in water quality provided the septic system functions as designed. The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood zone or 500 -year flood zone as shown on Butte County GIS maps, which are based on a Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map 06007C -0985D, dated June 20, 2000. The property is not located in an area prone to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact would occur with respect to these natural hazards. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 12 ■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No Reviewed Under Would the proposal: p ll Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? X b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production X rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been anted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course X of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or X amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of X polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade waterquality? X g. Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped by Federal Flood Hazard Boundary, Flood X Insurance Rate Map, or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures X which would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as X a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Impact Discussion: Solid wastes from the dogs are required to be picked up at least once per day and disposed of in an on-site septic system (see Mitigation Measures # 1 and 2 in Section 4.3). The County Environmental Health Department requires either the installation of a new septic system to handle the solid wastes from the dogs, or the expansion of the existing septic system. Use of a septic system for disposal of dog wastes would not cause a significant decrease in water quality provided the septic system functions as designed. The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood zone or 500 -year flood zone as shown on Butte County GIS maps, which are based on a Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map 06007C -0985D, dated June 20, 2000. The property is not located in an area prone to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact would occur with respect to these natural hazards. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 12 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Sehr and Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 • Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.9 LAND USE: Impact Discussion: The proposal would establish a kennel in an agricultural area. It would not divide any established community. The proposed project is located in an area zoned AR -1 for agricultural use on parcels of one acre or more in size. The nearest residential dwellings are located approximately 250 feet from the dogs pens. The dog pens can be easily seen from the dwelling on the parcel to the north because there is no intervening vegetation. The view of the dog pens from the dwelling on the parcel to the south is restricted due to intervening vegetation. Kennels are a permitted use in the AR -1 with the approval of a Use Permit. For the approval of the Use Permit, the applicant is required to present information, including plans or other information, that is substantial enough to make an informed decision. The Planning Commission reviews the proposal and will grant a Use Permit if: "the proposed uses of property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with, or injurious to, surrounding properties or detrimental to the health and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or the general health, welfare, and safety of the residents of the county" (Butte County Code, Section 24- 45.10). This Initial Study, the review by the Planning Commission based on information from planning staff and the applicant, and subsequent review of the project by the Department of Environmental Health will ensure compliance with all land use plans and policies and ensure the proposed project would not impair the health, welfare, or safety of Butte County residents. The property is not within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact would be incurred. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 13 ■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant with Significant No Under Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Previous Document Incorporated a. Physically divide an established community? X b. Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning X ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation lar? X Impact Discussion: The proposal would establish a kennel in an agricultural area. It would not divide any established community. The proposed project is located in an area zoned AR -1 for agricultural use on parcels of one acre or more in size. The nearest residential dwellings are located approximately 250 feet from the dogs pens. The dog pens can be easily seen from the dwelling on the parcel to the north because there is no intervening vegetation. The view of the dog pens from the dwelling on the parcel to the south is restricted due to intervening vegetation. Kennels are a permitted use in the AR -1 with the approval of a Use Permit. For the approval of the Use Permit, the applicant is required to present information, including plans or other information, that is substantial enough to make an informed decision. The Planning Commission reviews the proposal and will grant a Use Permit if: "the proposed uses of property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with, or injurious to, surrounding properties or detrimental to the health and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or the general health, welfare, and safety of the residents of the county" (Butte County Code, Section 24- 45.10). This Initial Study, the review by the Planning Commission based on information from planning staff and the applicant, and subsequent review of the project by the Department of Environmental Health will ensure compliance with all land use plans and policies and ensure the proposed project would not impair the health, welfare, or safety of Butte County residents. The property is not within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact would be incurred. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 13 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Setnd Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 4.10 MINERAL RESOURCES: 0 Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not use or extract any mineral or energy resources and would not restrict access to known mineral resource areas. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.11 NOISE: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Document Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Previous a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in Incorporated Document a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the X X residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local X X general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not use or extract any mineral or energy resources and would not restrict access to known mineral resource areas. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.11 NOISE: Impact Discussion: The project site is located in an agricultural area that is subject to noise generated by agricultural activities. Additional noise is generated by vehicle traffic on Upper Palermo Road. The project would create additional noise ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 14 ■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No Reviewed Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other X agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? X c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing X without theproject? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above X levels existing without theproject? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, X would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working X in the project area to excessive noise levels? Impact Discussion: The project site is located in an agricultural area that is subject to noise generated by agricultural activities. Additional noise is generated by vehicle traffic on Upper Palermo Road. The project would create additional noise ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 14 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Seh and Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 • in the area by allowing the keeping of approximately eight dogs. During staff's site visit on April 23, 2002, the dogs were quiet until staff approached the pens, at which point the dogs started barking. The applicant stated that the dogs usually bark only at strangers or wild animals. The nearest residential dwellings to the proposed project site are located approximately 250 feet away, one of which is buffered by trees. Other residences are located over 500 feet away. Since distance from a source of noise has an attenuating effect — for every doubling of distance, the level of sound decreases by approximately six decibels — noise levels at nearby homes from barking dogs can be expected to range from 55 to 70 decibels when the dogs are agitated. The 24-hour equivalent noise level associated with the dogs depends on the frequency by which they are disturbed, the time of day at which they are agitated, and their temperament. Given the agricultural zoning and character of the area, the sensitivity to noise impacts in this area is relatively lower than other more populated parts of the county. The mitigation measure included below reduces any potential impact to a less -than -significant level. The project is not located in the 65 or 70 CNEL airport noise contour, according to the Butte County General Plan. Mitigation Measure # 3: If the Department of Development Services or other County departments receive noise -related complaints regarding the project and the level of noise is in excess of established standards, the applicant shall implement recommendations of the Department of Development Services to reduce the noise impacts. In response to any pattern of noise complaints, the Development Services Department, at the expense of the applicant, shall conduct a noise analysis to establish the compliance of the project with standards in the Noise Element of the General Plan. Currently, the Noise Element establishes that acceptable levels of noise for the project area of up to 60 decibels Ldn or CNEL. If noise levels are in excess of established standards, the project applicant is required to reduce noise levels through recommendations of the Development Services Department, which may include, but are not limited to, building noise attenuation devices that provide some relief to nearby homes, erecting a sight obscuring fence so that the dogs can't see off the site, placing bark collars on the dogs that bark, or other recommendations. Any implemented recommendations to reduce noise would be subject to Building Permits and other applicable conditions. Timing: The applicant shall implement measures to reduce noise impacts as required by the Department of Development Services as a result of complaints during the operational phase of the project. Monitoring: The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to noise complaints. 4.12 HOUSING: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 15 ■ Less Than Reviewed Would the proposal: Potentially Significant Significant with Less Than Significant No Under Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Previous Incorporated Document a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through X extension of roads or other infrastructure? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing X elsewhere . c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 15 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine SehlTand Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 • Impact Discussion: The project would not affect the population of the area. The project would not displace individuals or housing. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.13 PUBLIC SERVICES: Impact Discussion: The project site is located in an unclassified area with regards to fire hazards, indicating that it is either in an urban or an agricultural area. The site is not located with the State Responsibility Area. Fire protection services for the project site are provided by the Butte County Fire Department in coordination with the State Division of Forestry. The project is required to comply with conditions specified by the Division of Forestry, to be accomplished in coordination with the Butte County Fire Department. The project is required to comply with Department of Forestry conditions, the project will not increase the level of fire service needed on the site. The proposal may result in minimal increase in demand for police services. Responses to noise complaints or other complaints at the property would not affect the ability of the Sheriffs Department to adequately provide police services since the project would result in very little change from existing conditions. The proposal would not result in an increase in demand for school facilities in the area. The project would not result in significant impacts to area parks and facilities. A less -than -significant impact is anticipated on other public services. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 16 ■ Less Than Reviewed Potentially Significant Less Than No Under Would the proposal: p p Significant with Significant Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Previous Incorporated Document a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in X order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services? b. Fireprotection? X c. Police Protection? X d. Schools? X e. Parks? X f. Other public services? X Impact Discussion: The project site is located in an unclassified area with regards to fire hazards, indicating that it is either in an urban or an agricultural area. The site is not located with the State Responsibility Area. Fire protection services for the project site are provided by the Butte County Fire Department in coordination with the State Division of Forestry. The project is required to comply with conditions specified by the Division of Forestry, to be accomplished in coordination with the Butte County Fire Department. The project is required to comply with Department of Forestry conditions, the project will not increase the level of fire service needed on the site. The proposal may result in minimal increase in demand for police services. Responses to noise complaints or other complaints at the property would not affect the ability of the Sheriffs Department to adequately provide police services since the project would result in very little change from existing conditions. The proposal would not result in an increase in demand for school facilities in the area. The project would not result in significant impacts to area parks and facilities. A less -than -significant impact is anticipated on other public services. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 16 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Sehl and Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 • 4.14 RECREATION: Impact Discussion: No recreational facilities are proposed under this proposal. No impacts on existing or future recreational facilities are expected. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Potentially Significant Significant with Less Than Significant No Under Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Previous Incorporated Document a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility X would occur or be accelerated? b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the X environment? X Impact Discussion: No recreational facilities are proposed under this proposal. No impacts on existing or future recreational facilities are expected. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 17 ■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No Reviewed Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in X either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or X highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in X location that results in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or X incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? X f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g. Conflict with accepted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus X turnouts, bicycle racks)? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 17 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Seh and Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 • Impact Discussion: The project site fronts on Upper Palermo Road. No new driveways or access points are proposed. There would be no significant increase in traffic associated with the project because the dogs would be owned by the applicant and no boarding of dogs owned by others would be allowed. Mitillation Measure: None required. 4.16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Impact Discussion: The proposed project would include a septic system for sewer service and an individual well for water service. Thus, the project would not have a significant impact on any wastewater or water treatment facilities. No off-site storm water drainage improvements should be required due to development of the project site. The project may increase the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill by a minimal amount. According to the Butte County Public Works Department, the Neal Road Landfill is expected to reach maximum holding capacity by the year 2018. The project would have little or no impact on the capacity of this landfill. No impact would occur with respect to federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 18 ■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No Reviewed Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of X existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing X facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements X needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the X project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? L Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste X disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes, and regulations related to solid waste? X Impact Discussion: The proposed project would include a septic system for sewer service and an individual well for water service. Thus, the project would not have a significant impact on any wastewater or water treatment facilities. No off-site storm water drainage improvements should be required due to development of the project site. The project may increase the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill by a minimal amount. According to the Butte County Public Works Department, the Neal Road Landfill is expected to reach maximum holding capacity by the year 2018. The project would have little or no impact on the capacity of this landfill. No impact would occur with respect to federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 18 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Seh .d Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 • Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (SECTION 15065): With the implementation of recommended mitigation measures, the project would not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment beyond the impacts discussed in the previous sections of this Initial Study. The project has the potential to contribute impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable with respect to Initial Study Checklist Items 4.3 - Air Quality and 4.11 — Noise. Cumulative impacts to these areas would be mitigated due to the inclusion of mitigation measures included in each of these sections and summarized in the following section. 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: Mitigation Measure # 1: The project applicant shall pick up solid wastes from the dogs at least once per day and dispose of the wastes in a septic system approved by the Butte County Environmental Health Division. Timing: The mitigation measure shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel. Monitoring: The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to complaints concerning odors. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 19 ■ Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No Reviewed Under Would the proposal: Significant with Significant Impact Previous Impact Mitigation Impact Document Incorporated a. Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the . habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal X community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection X with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects)? c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human X beings, either directly or indirectly? With the implementation of recommended mitigation measures, the project would not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment beyond the impacts discussed in the previous sections of this Initial Study. The project has the potential to contribute impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable with respect to Initial Study Checklist Items 4.3 - Air Quality and 4.11 — Noise. Cumulative impacts to these areas would be mitigated due to the inclusion of mitigation measures included in each of these sections and summarized in the following section. 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: Mitigation Measure # 1: The project applicant shall pick up solid wastes from the dogs at least once per day and dispose of the wastes in a septic system approved by the Butte County Environmental Health Division. Timing: The mitigation measure shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel. Monitoring: The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to complaints concerning odors. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 19 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Scoh .d Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 Mitigation Measure # 2: Prior to issuance of the Use Permit, the project applicant shall prepare a specific plan for disposing of dog waste, which shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Department for approval in conjunction with their review of the septic system. The project applicant shall implement any measures recommended by the Environmental Health Division and Animal Control Division for disposing of the dog waste. Timing: Plans for disposal and recommendations of the Environmental Health Division and Animal Control Division shall be adhered to during the entire operational life of the kennel. Monitoring: Building inspectors shall spot check for aspects of the plan that involve improvements to the property. The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to complaints concerning odors. Mitigation Measure # 3: If the Department of Development Services or other County departments receive noise -related complaints regarding the project and the level of noise is in excess of established standards, the applicant shall implement recommendations of the Department of Development Services to reduce the noise impacts. In response to any pattern of noise complaints, the Development Services Department, at the expense of the applicant, shall conduct a noise analysis to establish the compliance of the project with standards in the Noise Element of the General Plan. Currently, the Noise Element establishes that acceptable levels of noise for the project area of up to 60 decibels Ldn or CNEL. If noise levels are in excess of established standards, the project applicant is required to reduce noise levels through recommendations of the Development Services Department, which may include, but are not limited to, building noise attenuation devices that provide some relief to nearby homes, erecting a sight obscuring fence so that the dogs can't see off the site, placing bark collars on the dogs that bark, or other recommendations. Any implemented recommendations to reduce noise would be subject to Building Permits and other applicable conditions. Timing: The applicant shall implement measures to reduce noise impacts as required by the Department of Development Services as a result of complaints during the operational phase of the project. Monitoring: The Animal Control Division and/or the Planning Division shall respond to noise complaints. 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL: 1. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Mg. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County GIS Data. Oroville, CA: November 2001. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 10. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV -1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 11. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: C112M Hill, 1977. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 20 ■ Project Name: Use Permit for Lorraine Sehnd Lorraine Martin, File # UP 02-15 12. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1, Safety Element. Oroville, CA C112M Hill, 1977. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Mans. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1989. 7.0 CONSULTED AGENCIES: [X] Environmental Health [X] Public Works [ ] Building Manager [ ] BCAG [ ] ALUC [X] LAFCo [X] Assessor [X] Development Services [ ] Chico Unified School Distr. [ ] Air Qual. Management Dist. [ ] City of Chico [ ] City of Biggs [ ] City of Gridley [ ] City of Oroville [ ] Town of Paradise [X] CA Department of Forestry [ ] Caltrans (Traffic) [ ] Central Reg. Water Quality [ ] Department of Conservation [ ] CA Dept. of Fish and Game [ ] Highway Patrol [ ] Army Corps of Engineers [ ] US Fish & Wldlife Service [X] Agricultural Commissioner [ ] Butte Co. Farm Bureau [ ] Oroville Union School Dist. [ ] Feather River Rec. Dist. [ ] El Medio Fire Dept. [ ] OWID [ ] LOAPUD [ ] PG&E [ ] Pacific Bell [ ] Palermo Union School Dist. [X] Animal Control 8.0 PROJECT SPONSOR(S) INCORPORATION OF MITIGATION INTO PROPOSED PROJECT: I/We have reviewed the Initial Study for the Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin Use Permit (APN # 026-070-031) application and particularly the mitigation measures identified herein. I/We hereby modify the application on file with the Butte County Planning Department to include and incorporate all mitigations set forth in this Initial Study. r sect Sponsor/Project Agent ject Sponsor/Project A ent k:\projects\upc\sehrt\sehrt initial study.doc - iD-0 Date ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 21 ■ June 5, 2002 REVISED BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on June 27, 2002, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, at 9:30 a.m. regarding the following item In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for the following project: MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Lorraine Sehrt (Martin), Use Permit to allow a private dog kennel. The Use Permit would allow the keeping of the applicant's personal dogs; no dogs owned by others would be boarded. A maximum of eleven (11) dogs would be allowed. Butte County Code allows no more than five dogs over the age of four months to be kept on a single parcel for any reason whatsoever. Solid wastes from the dogs are currently picked up every morning and buried on-site; however, the Butte County Environmental Health Department requires the dog wastes to be disposed of in a septic system. The applicant would be required to obtain a sewage disposal permit from the Environmental Health Department for either an addition to the existing septic system or for a second septic system. The applicant would also require a kennel permit from the Environmental Health Department's Animal Control Division for the kenneling of more than five dogs. The property is zoned AR -1 (Agricultural Residential — 1 acre parcels) and is located on the west side of Upper Palermo Road, midway between Bohemia Avenue and Messina Avenue, at 6944 Upper Palermo Road, Palermo. APN 026-070-031 (SB) (UP 02-15) The initial study for the project identifies potentially significant effects, but revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. Therefore, Planning Division staff is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project are on file for public review starting, June 6, 2002, through June 26, 2002, at the Butte County Planning 14 • Li Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. All interested persons are invited to review the document. Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above address. If you challenge either the Mitigated Negative Declaration or the Tentative Parcel Map Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the public hearing. For further information regarding this project, please contact Stephen Betts, project planner, at the Butte County Planning Division at (530) 538-7153. FRED DAVIS, INTERIM DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Oroville Mercury on Tuesday, June 11, 2002. Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Castillo, Wendy Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:42 PM To: Betts, Steve Subject: RE: Planning Commission for Shert/Martin Use Permit for a Dog Steve, I will attempt to attend I have it on my calendar. Did you receive my e-mail with our comments? I believe that there is 11 dogs on the property to date, I would suggest a condition of : 11 existing dogs (some of them are very old) with a cap of 8 dogs through attrition. -----Original Message ----- From: Betts, Steve Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:56 PM To: Castillo, Wendy Subject: Planning Commission for Shert/Martin Use Permit for a Dog Kennel Wendy, The Shert/Martin Use Permit project for an 8 -dog dog kennel (File # UP 02-15, APN 026-070- 031, 6944 Upper Palermo Road) is scheduled for the June 27th Planning Commission meeting at 9:30 a.m. It would be great if you or someone else from Animal Control could be there to answer any questions the Commission may have. So far I have not received any verbal or written comments from any of the neighbors. Thanks Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division Desk - (530) 539-7153 Fax - (530) 538-7785 6/4/2002 y Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:56 PM To: Castillo, Wendy Subject: Planning Commission for Shert/Martin Use Permit for a Dog Wendy, The Shert/Martin Use Permit project for an 8 -dog dog kennel (File # UP 02-15, APN 026-070-031, 6944 Upper Palermo Road) is scheduled for the June 27th Planning Commission meeting at 9:30 a.m. It would be great if you or someone else from Animal Control could be there to answer any questions the Commission may have. So far I have not received any verbal or written comments from any of the neighbors. Thanks Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division Desk - (530) 539-7153 Fax - (530) 538-7785 6/4/2002 0 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT 411 MAIN STREET • P. O. BOX 5364 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95927 OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 TEL: (916) 891-2727 TEL: (916) 538-7281 FAX: (916) 895-6512 FAX: (916) 538-2140 Permit Issued to �b (L Date Issued 11 EXPIRES ONE YEAR FROM DATE OF ISSUANCE To construct a sewage disposal system for: V2 VA n D L. b. -LS Th&.) -50 4 9d (,�Xafi� P_ U' Located at:x 1� .� A.P. # D") SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS SEPTIC TANK Liquid capa ' • U gallons Material i�1 Special cond LEACHING FIELD Total length: /UU feet Trench width: Z % inches Minimum No. of lines: Rock under pipe inches Additional leaching field will be required if bxperience shows it to be necessary. No part ofhe sy em may be located within 50 feet of the center line of any County Road. qL) I � ?'A AV, NOTE: Satisfactory inspection by the Health Department is required before backfilling or putting the system into use. Occupancy of a new building is not permitted until the system is approved. e Permit Fee $ c Penalty Fee $ Additional Fee $ Receipt No. �67)< S31 - 278R (Rev. 6/94) TE � V E 1 0 JUN 3 2002 lio BUTTE COUNTY ANNING DIVISII Issued By: �)O n May 22 2002 'Satte, 160, L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH A N D BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785. To: Craig Erickson, Butte County Environmental Health.Division . Wendy Castillo, Butte County Animal Control Division Re: NOTICE OF INTENT - To Adopt a Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for a Use Permit for Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin on APN 026-070-031, File # UP 02-15 The Butte County Planning Division has. completed an Initial Study, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), of potential environmental consequences anticipated in connection with the above-mentioned project, a copy of which is enclosed. This letter serves as a Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration to' allow responsible and trustee agencies a 20 -day review period in accordance with Sections 15072 and 15105 of the CEQA Guidelines. Please review the enclosed Initial Study and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration. This review should focus on your department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. The project has been scheduled for the June 27, 2002, Planning Commission meeting and any comments to the enclosed initial study must be received prior to that meeting. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed environmental document, please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. I can be reached directly at (530) 538- 7153 or via e-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner • INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION To: File (Use Permit UP 02-15, Sert and Martin) From: Steve Betts Subject: Signed Initial Study Received Date: May 21, 2002 The signed initial study for the above referenced project was returned by the applicant this date. They also returned my May 6, 2002, letter to them. r r �. May 6, 2002 Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin 6944 Upper Palermo Road Oroville, CA 95966 • ,�iuite C L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH A N D BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Re: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine: Martin Use Permit, APN 026-070-031, File # UP 02-15 Dear Ms. Sehrt and Ms. Martin: Pursuant to Section 15063 of the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3), an Initial Study has been prepared to determine if the above -referenced project would have significant adverse effects on the environment. The Initial Study determined that mitigation measures are necessary to prevent the project from causing significant impacts to the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. Please review the enclosed initial study and recommended mitigation measures, noting particularly any environmental problems which could be minimized or avoided by the care and manner in which the project is carried out. Section 15070(b)(1) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines requires that the project applicant, or his or her agent, provide a written consent to the proposed mitigation measures prior to release of the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study for public review. The recommended mitigation measures constitute a revision to the project. If you agree to the mitigation measures, please sign Section 8 of the Initial Study and return to the Planning Division. The Initial Study will be released for public review and the project set for a public hearing by the Butte County Planning Commission once we have received the signed Initial Study. The signed Initial Study must be returned to this office by May 20, 2002, in order to be scheduled for the June 13, 2002, Planning Commission meeting. If you do not agree to the mitigation measures, please contact this office as soon as possible to discuss possible alternatives. Should you have any further questions regarding this Mitigated Negative Declaration, please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at (530) 538-7153. Sincerely, moozz ws��J/ Stephen Betts Senior Planner Enclosure L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 May 6, 2002 Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin 6944 Upper Palermo Road Oroville, CA 95966 Re: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin Use Permit, APN 026-070-031, File # UP 02-15 Dear Ms. Sehrt and Ms. Martin: Pursuant to Section 15063 of the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3), an Initial Study has been prepared to determine if the above -referenced project would have significant adverse effects on the environment. The Initial Study determined that mitigation measures are necessary to prevent the project from causing significant impacts to the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. Please review the enclosed initial study and recommended mitigation measures, noting particularly any environmental problems which could be minimized or avoided by the care and manner in which the project is carried out. Section 15070(b)(1) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines requires that the project applicant, or his or her agent, provide a written consent to the proposed mitigation measures prior to release of the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study for public review. The recommended mitigation measures constitute a revision to the project. If you agree to the mitigation measures, please sign Section 8 of the Initial Study and return to the Planning Division. The Initial Study will be released for public review and the project set for a public hearing by the Butte County Planning Commission once we have received the signed Initial Study. The signed Initial Study must be returned to this office by May 20, 2002, in order to be scheduled for the June 13, 2002, Planning Commission meeting. If you do not agree to the mitigation measures, please contact this office as soon as possible to discuss possible alternatives. T Should you have any further questions regarding this Mitigated Negative Declaration, please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at (530) 538-7153. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner Enclosure u eCount L A N D O F NATURAL. WEALTH A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 May 6, 2002 Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin 6944 Upper Palermo Road Oroville, CA 95966 Re: Application Complete — Use Permit for Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin on APN 026-070-031, File # UP 02-15 Dear Ms. Sehrt and Ms. Martin: Pursuant to Section 65943 of California Government Code, Title 7, Division 1, the above referenced project was deemed "complete" on March 27, 2002. Environmental review will be conducted within the next 30 days pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at (530) 538-7153, or via E-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner s -6,atte Count L A N D O F NATURAL W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 May 6, 2002 Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin 6944 Upper Palermo Road Oroville, CA 95966 Re: Use Permit for Lorraine Sehrt and Lorraine Martin on APN 026-070-031, File # UP 02-15 Dear Ms. Sehrt and Ms. Martin: Thank you for the submittal of the above referenced application received on February 25, 2002. The project application, maps, and related items have been reviewed by County Agencies in order to determine the completeness of the application. Enclosed please find copies of the comments we have received from agencies regarding this project. These comments have been received as part of the initial thirty (30) day review of the project. Please review these comments and the conditions that are requested as part of the project's approval. Should you have any further questions regarding these comments, please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at (530) 538- 7153, or via E-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. Sincerely, 11_�_ G*_ Stephen Betts Senior Planner Enc. Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Castillo, Wendy Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:17 AM To: Betts, Steve Subject: RE: Shert/Martin Use Permit application for a Dog Kennel, APN 026-070-031,.6944 Upper Paley mo Road, Palermo , Steve, The only conditions I would request is a limit of 11 dogs,all dogs must be currently vaccinated against rabies, bark collar condition if barking becomes a nuisance, obtain kennel license within 30 days from approval of use permit. Could you please let me know when this goes before the planning commission. Thanks hope this helps. -----Original Message ----- From: Betts, Steve Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 3:18 PM To: Castillo, Wendy Subject: Shert/Martin Use Permit application for a Dog Kennel, APN 026-070-031, 6944 Upper Palermo Road, Palermo Wendy, We sent you a request for comments on this project on March 6th but haven't recf,iyed anything from you. l just wanted to make sure you did get the request, so please let me know if you did or didn'f get it.,. Ais-b, could you let me know if there has been any complaints regarding noise or odors from the`dogs on the property? Thanks. Steve 7153 5/3/2002 Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Castillo, Wendy Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:25 AM To: Betts, Steve Subject: RE: Shert/Martin Use Permit application for a Dog Kennel, APN 026-070-031, 6944 Upper Palermo Road, Palermo Steve, I don't believe I received that request. Would you please send me another copy.Thanks Wendy -----Original Message ----- From: Betts, Steve Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 3:18 PM . To: Castillo, Wendy Subject: Shert/Martin Use Permit application for a Dog Kennel, APN 026-070-031, 6944 Upper Palermo Road, Palermo Wendy, We sent you a request for comments on this project on March 6th but haven't received anything from you just wanted to make sure you did get the request, so please let me know if you did or didn't get it. Also, could you let me know if there has been any complaints regarding noise or odors from the dogs on the property? Thanks. Steve 7153 4/30/2002 Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 3:18 PM To: Castillo, Wendy Subject: Shert/Martin Use Permit application for a Dog Kennel, APN 026-070-031, 6944 Upper Palermo Read, Palermo Wendy, We sent you a request for comments on this project on March 6th but haven't received anything from you. I just wanted to make sure you did get the request, so please let me know if you did or didn't get it. Also, could you. let me know if there has been any complaints regarding noise or odors from the dogs on the property? Thanks. Steve 7153 4/29/2002 ,. i Irr-r R D EC U MAR 1 5 2002 TO: A LNrURAL 0 BUTTE COUNTY TMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION G04 Rprpit/of� MAR 12 2002 cCIJLTU?� RE: Request for Comments on a.Development Application: Lorraine M. Sehrt (Martin), UP 02-15 DATE: March 6, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for a private kennel on property zoned AR -1 (Agricultural Residential, 1 -acre }parcels located on the west side of Upper Palermo Rd., midway between Bohemia Ave and Messina Ave., Palermo, identified as APN 026-070-031. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON June 27, 2002. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 20,2002- If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional (n�pages if necessary): c - By: Date: 40 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 • VM 4 2002 BUTTE COUNTY • LAFCo DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NAR 12 2002 PLANNING DIVISION TO: LAFCo Oroville, California FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Lorraine M. Sehrt (Martin), UP 02-15 DATE: March 6, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for a private kennel on property zoned AR -1 (Agricultural Residential, 1-acrean rcels located on the west side of 11pper Palermo Rd., midway between Bohemia Ave and Messina Ave., Palermo, identified as APN 026-070-031. Supervisorial District No. 1. 09z 000 THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON June 27, 2002. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 20,2002- Ifno no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): Qrwdh �/. P6el erno / me- E. f. D. Jil<< Com {.. s Oroville uhlo.r At s.a. T Qui/. 6Ile ac I CIA ICf By: <'L4. 6 u, Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION W 12 W TO: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY BUTTE COUNTY FROM: Butte County Planning Division PLANNING DIVISION RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Lorraine M. Sehrt (Martin), UP 02-15 DATE: March 6, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for a private kennel on property zoned AR -1 (Agricultural Residential, I-acreap rcels located on the west side of Upper Palermo Rd., midway between Bohemia Ave. and Messina Ave., Palermo, identified as APN 026-070-031. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON June 27, 2002. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 20,2002- If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date:�� 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 r BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Lorraine M. Sehrt (Martin) DATE: March 6, 2002 AGENT: APN: 026-070-031 FILE #: UP 02-15 PLANNER: Craig Sanders PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for a private kennel Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS 1. Construction, installation or development of structures or facilities on the parcels/lots shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, (Public Resources Code 4290), and all other applicable State and County codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of application for improvement permits. X2. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and maintained continuously thereafter. 3. Fire hydrant identification, reflector or post reflectors shall be installed acceptable to the County Fire Warden. —4. In lieu of a pressurized water system or water storage tank, payment of $200.00 per created parcel into the Battalion _ water tend fund, is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. —5. A pressurized community water system for fire protection is required. The specific locations and fire flow requirements shall be in accordance with the Fire Department specifications and to the satisfaction of the County Fire Warden. Average required hydrant spacing _ feet, hydrant size _ inches, and residual fire flow _ gpm. Submit plans to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction of facilities. 6. In lieu of hydrant installation, payment may be made into the hydrant fund at a cost of $1.72 per lineal foot of street frontage. The estimated fee amount is $ 7. Prior to recordation of the Map or application for a building permit, the applicant shall pay the then current fee for the West Chico Fire Station Fund. 8. Provide an all weather access of at least 10 foot wide and with a vertical clearance of 15 feet that will accommodate a 40,000 pound fire apparatus to all structures. 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 DEC E O V E ironm a� BBUTTE COUNTY VAR 12 20 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES7(0,U17t PLANNING DIVISION Orov. enCaion�e 101TE COUIIJNVIRONM TAL HEALTH DIV 0 lanning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Lorraine M. Sehrt (Martin), UP 02-15 DATE: March 6, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for a private kennel on property zoned AR -1 (Agricultural Residential, 1 -acre parcels located on the west side of Upper Palermo Rd., midway between Bohemia Ave. and Messina Ave. Palermo, identified as APN 026-070-031. Supervisorial District No. 1• THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON June 27 2002. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 20, 2002. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if By: 014012 _106 Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 . _ ,t qZ • • BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION D. VAR I t W TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR L FROM: Butte County Planning Division BUTTE COUNTY RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Lorraine M. Sehrt (Maqifi4l 4W OWING DIVISI( DATE: March 6, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for a private kennel on property zoned AR -1 (Agricultural Residential, 1-acrean rcels located on the west side of I 1pper Palermo Rd., midway between Bohemia Ave. and Messina Ave., Palermo, identified as APN 026-070-031. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - _DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON lune 27, 2002. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 211.2002. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): Ub � c Gyo i QCs (o n�(ill�=yK Gil /ka✓� By: Date: )OZ RECEIVED 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 MAR a 8 2002 WUNTY OF BUTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT DIV. T. BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Lorraine M. Sehrt (Martin) DATE: March 6, 2002 AGENT: APN: 026-070-031 FILE #: UP 02-15 PLANNER: Craig Sanders PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for a private kennel Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS A. STREETS 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits obtain encroachment permit for all new or existing driveway approaches and construct them to County standards, as specified in County Improvement Standards. —2. Prior to the issuance of building permits deed to Butte County, in fee simple, _ feet of right-of-way from the centerline of . The right of way shall be sufficient for the installation of standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits submit road and drainage improvement plans for the installation and construction of the street frontage improvements on to standard, including but not limited to P.C.C. curb, gutter and sidewalk and the required street section for parcels with gross acreage of one acre or less. Construct or install the required improvements. 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits dedicate a one foot "no access strip" or relinquish abutters rights to Butte County, along the frontage of parcels , except at approved access points. B. DRAINAGE 1. Prior to the recordation of the issuance of building permits a plan for a permanent solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained on site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. —2. Prior to the issuance of building permits establish 100 year floodplain elevations and the lowest floor elevations for any structures. Show on the site plan map for building permits the elevations (by contours), and the location of an accepted NVGD benchmark and a temporary benchmark on-site. C. LEGAL LOT STATUS 1. Prior to the issuance of the Use Permit, prove, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works, that the parcel of the subject application is a legal parcel. RECEIVE® MAR 0 R 2002 COUNTY OF BUTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT DIV. 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 AP 026-070-031 Lorraine Sehrt UP 02-15 Mailing List Distribution 1 J M4F-D 700 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 4200 4900 Feet BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CONMUSSION Applicant: Lorraine M. Sehrt (Martin) Owner: Same Hearing Date: Existing Zone: AR- 1(Agricultural, Residential, 1 acre min.) N Supervisorial Request: Use Permit to allow a private dog kennel. District # 1 Assessor Parcel No: 026-070-031 File:UP 02-15 LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: 1'1 026-070-031 M-114 no"NOT-Toweroml NOT OWNER: same `' REPRESENTATIVE: REQUEST:Permit forprivate-in SIZE: 1.89 acres LOCATION: on the west sideof •• Palen -no Cdmidway between Bohemia Ave, and Messina Ave., Palenno SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT # 1 EXISTING ZONING: AR -1 Agricultural Residential, I --acre parcels ZONING HISTORY: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Agricultural Residential APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: MINI 1" 9 1 owl pill MR.. CIO I "DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: UIQ Oa-ls AP# Od&-O:�o-oil 53 3-- ss:7s; APPLICANT: 1ee1L t --J GN&L b9yY PALO,,049 OWNER: si✓��, REPRESENTATIVE: S PROPOSED REQUEST: (to be filled out by person taking in application) / l4• /s P L -\/L /rb ! T Y.o,? A do/;, Ll t_ ✓.vtL%mD #SI FINAL REQUEST: (to be filled out by project planner) SIZE: LOCATION: Q we -57 5"t OG o l= L 60146 -MIA- I P N) r S S l V4✓¢vG : feV-Mb DISTRICT # EXISTING ZONING: A ? - GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: A 1.03 \241111.12121 Date Project Assigned 30 Day Complete }? M4,T Oa Preset Hearing Date dD LOO PLANNERS INITIALS M—S APPLICATION: DATE: County Offices and Cities: Chief Administrative Officer -1L Environmental Health _ Sheriff _)L LAFCo Biggs Oroville Information Systems Dept. Irrigation District: Butte Water _ OWID Table Mountain Irrigation Domestic Water Butte Water District OWID Sewer Butte Water District Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) Fire Protection X California Department of Forestry Recreation Districts Chico Area Recreation Paradise Recreation & Park Utilities PG&E North - Chico PG&E South - Oroville State Agencies COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST JL Develop. Services Director _.x._ Assesor _ BCAG Air Quality Mgmt. _ Gridley _ Paradise Animal Control _Biggs/W. Gridley Water _ Paradise Irrigation Thennalito Irrigation _California Water Service Co. Thermalito I rrigation District _ Themalito Irrigation _ L.O.A. PUD EI Medio Fire Protection District Durham Area Recreation _ Richvale Recreation & Parks Chambers Cable TV _ Viacom Cable TV CalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept. of Water Resources _ Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter) _ Dept of Parks and Rec. Central Reg. Water Quality Cont. _ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program _ Department of Conservation _ Off. of Mining Reclamation _ Dept.Social Services, Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies US Forest Service _ Army Corps of Engineers Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. _ Lime Saddle Dist _ Drainage Reclamation Butte Co. Mining Committee Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. Mosq. Abatement. Oroville/Butte Co _ US Bureau of Land Management _ National Marine Fisheries Sservice Community Association Butte Env.l Council Cal Native Plant Society _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _ Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancy X Public Works Director Building Manager ALUC Butte Co. Farm Bureau Chico _ Chico Airport Commission X Agricultural Commission Durham Irrigation _ Richvale Irrigation Other _ Del Oro Water Co. _ Other Sterling City Sewer Main Feather River Rec. & Park Pacific Bell Dept. of Fish and Game _ Highway Patrol Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations US Fish & Wildlife Service School Districts K:\PLANNING\FORMS\DISTR.LIS PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST Project Planners fill out this in-house checklist upon receipt of a new project. Project Number: Project Site Zoning Project Planner: Project/Applicafign Name: General Plan Designation:_ APN: Date Is the project located within any of the following are? North Chico Specific Plan Oroville Enterprise Zone Williamson Act Land CLCA: 100 Year Flood Plain ❑ Within FEMA Floodway ❑ Within DWR Floodway Dam Inundation Area Watershed Protection Overlay Zone East Avenue Specific Plan Chico Area Greenline (Project in a ACRES: a where Greenline policies apply) Greater Chico Area Redevelopme t Area Nitrate Action Plan Area ❑ Planning Areas ❑ Durham -Dayton -Ne ❑ Oroville Area Land ❑ Chico Area Land U. ❑ Gridley -Biggs La d ❑ Honcut Area Cohasset Area [❑ Palermo Area ❑ Chapman/Mu erry s n Planning Area se Plan (Adopted 3/29/84) e Plan (Adopted 3/18/90) Use Plan (Adopted 8/586) ❑ Urban Reserve ❑ Paradise Urban Reserve ❑ Oroville Urban Reserve ❑ Chico Urban Reserve ❑ Gridley Urban Reserve Planning Area (in process of adoption 9-14-99) ❑ Deer Herd Areas ❑ Designate Development Zone ❑ Winter R ge ❑ Critical inter Range ❑ Summer ange ❑ Critical ummer Range ❑ Major igration Corridor ❑ Interme iate Deer Range ❑ If Cons rained, The Minimum Parcel Size Is acres. ❑ CLUP Area ❑ AIRPORT AREA OF INFLUENCE ❑ Chico unicipal Airport Environs Plan ❑ Chico ❑ Paradi e Skypark ❑ Paradise Skypark ❑ Ranc ero ❑ Ranchero ❑ Oroville ❑ Oroville 0 Airport Land Use Commission Review (ALUC) Required ti ❑ Urban Area (As defined in Improvement Standards for Chapter 20) ❑ City of Chico ❑ Durham ❑ City of Gridley ❑ City of Oroville ❑ Mountain Recreational Area ❑ Sphere of Influence ❑ City of Chico ❑ City of Gridley ❑ City of Oroville ❑ City of Biggs ❑ City of Paradise A ❑ Watershed Areas ❑ Butte Creek Cherokee ❑ Big Chico Creek Wyman Ravine Study Area ❑ Little Chico Creek ❑ Rock Creek Study Area ❑ Sacramento River Conservation (SB 1086) ❑ WP Overlay Zone Area Essential Services Public Water District Public Sewer District If well and/or on-site sewage disposal, has Envi requirements? ❑ Pre -application review complete ❑ Pre -application review not required ❑ Drainage District/CSA ❑ Fire District ❑ Butte County ❑ El Medio Fire District Federal Aid Road(s) Other Permits required from otherAgencies ❑ Department of Water ❑ Reclamation Board ❑ Department of Fish a� ❑ CALTRANS ❑ Regional Water Qu ❑ Army Corps of Eng n ❑ Butte County Air Q ❑ Other Comments: �esources (DWR)/ id Game (DFG) ty Control Board eers .lity Control District Version: 9/28/99 CANly DocumentsTRIOIECT REVIEW CH IST.doc ❑ Well(s) ❑ On-site Sewer Health determined the application filing Agency Special Review ❑ Office of Mine Reclamation ❑ HCD (Mobile Home Parks) ❑ Department of Fish and Game ❑ Other • TO whom it concerns : 40 Lorraine M Sehrt Lorraine M Martin 6944 Upper Palermo Road fkoville, California 95966 My Mother and I would like to apply for a kennel license, we are both seniors and for many years have open our doors to stray dogs and cats, they have a good home with us. We are not breeding the animals for sale, but giving them a home, all the animals are taken care of by DR.Mewborn and we do have them neutered and sprayed. The animals that we have receive good care and are very healthy, ( down right spoiled ) they have been our life, for eight years and it gives us pleasure to care for them, they also give us joy, love and something to look forward in our lives, to keep us busy as we get older_ Please consider our request. Looking forward to receive and answer from you. Thank you for your time. Sincerely yours Lorraine M. Sehrt Lorraine M_ Martin FEB 2 5 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION TO: FROM: RE: DATE: BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION Butte County Planning Division Request for Comments on a Development Application: Lorraine M. Sehrt (Martin), UP 02-15 March 6, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for a private kennel on property zoned AR 1 (Agricultural Residential, 1-acrean rcels located on the west side of Upper Palermo Rd„ midway between Bohemia Ave. and Messina Ave., Palermo, identified as APN _026-070-031. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON June 27, 2002. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 20, 2002. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 J --- 256' -- -- . ---- 4 26' 10'x10' KENNELS Lo o �S Q. P� 122' d 9 Is 7.5'x 25' j DOG PENST DOG 28'x64' H❑USE 0'� 38 WELL 104' SCALE: 1'= 60' WER E C E � W E F E B 2 5 2002 BUTTE COUNTY 110' ¢ �/ t'�LtPLANNING DIVISION 3 > GAS of o�—MET R ca 152' LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD 4 A.P.N. 026-070-031 UPPER PALERMO ROAD DRAWN BY: DATE: J.B. 1/20/02 r-..L-cKMo CITRUS . TR. SU8 NO, i M.O. R. WALL NO. 3 Assessor's Mop No. 26_07 NOTE -ASSESSOR'S PARCEL BLOCK r 256' 104' ' Pi SCALE: 1'= 60' ' f ' 10'x10' KENNELS o S d 5?-- I 1 1 -15'f—= 9 SHED DOG PE 7.5'x 25'DECK DOG PENS i28'x64'. SHE A/C. H❑USE 5ff0° El YELL r 110' a W cx A 4p' UPPER PALERMO ROAD, - LORRAINE MARTIN 6.944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD A.P.N. 026-070-031 ' DRAWN 9Y: DATE: J. B. 1/20/02 t.� t7fmYS 126 z phi V ` 104' 5 S 1 60' a mol\�G o JS Oct 10'x10' KENNELS cLo�s o �S L 122' �o� SCP c - 5' 15' tea` �ro�� 1 9 SHED-\ DOG PE 7.5'x 25' DECK DOG PENS-��r°�� 28'x64' E C E Q W E SHED A/ HOUSE D 50't 1 38' W� L FEB 2 5 2002 /I POWER BUTTE COUNTY 110, a ./ 1 POLE PLANNING DIVISION j GAS A o��MEI'ER 152- LORRAINE MARTIN 6944 UPPER PALERMO ROAD 4 A:P.N. 026-070-031 UPPER PALERMO ROAD DRAWN BY: DATE: J.B. ..... 1/20/02 I 1a�T� TZ> p A- Vq5 cr ��►"{ e -Fob � e Xt�-i e� W CLZ6 4