HomeMy WebLinkAboutUP 96-18PROJECT SUMMARY SHEn
FILE #: UP 96-18 PROJECT TYPE: Use Permit
APPLICANT: Blake Roath
ADDRESS: 1826 Citrus Ave, Chico, CA 95926
OWNER: Leta Gage
ADDRESS: 1913 Spruce Ave Chico CA 95926
REPRESENTATIVE: None
ADDRESS:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit to operate a child care center with a licensed capacity for 60 children.
PROPERTY ZONED: R-1 LOCATED: 1913 Spruce Ave. Chico, CA 95926 behveen 9th Avenue and 10th Avenue.
AP#: 003-353-007 & 10 TOWN/AREA: Chico
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density /Residential
F.� a
1. Application complete: 4-9-96 Amount: $ 1288.00 Receipt #: 15344
2. Comments sent to: EH/Sheriff/LAFCo/DSD/Plannine Manager/Calif. Water Service/PG& E/CDF/PW/City of Chico/Ag Com
3. Comments received from:
4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked:
5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet:
6. Assigned To: Stephen Hackney
7. Environmental Determination:
8. Staff Report:
State Clearinghouse No:
Subject to Fish & Game:
Project Video:
9. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No
10. Publication Notice Written:
Categorical Exemption-CEQA#
Negative Declaration
Mitigation Negative Declaration
Environmental Impact Report
Gen. Rule Ex. -CEQA # 15061.(bx3)
Other
Date Sent to SCH:
Display Ad Prepared:
11. Notices Mailed: Number of Notices:
12. Newspaper Publication Date: O C P G B R
13. Planning Commission Hearing(s):_
Action taken:
Special Conditions:
Commission Resolution No.
14.
Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): _
Action taken:
Board Resolution No.:
15.
Type Use Permit/Send for signature:
16.
N.O.E. / N.O.D. / APPENDIX G: _
17.
Send validated Use Permit:
18.
Assessor's Memo:
19.
Copy of Use Permit / Variance to Planning Technician:
1�/t��� 6 I °► � 6
Ordinance No: Adopted:
Fish & Game Fees Paid: Yes No
I
r
� �� W Ql v
DEPARTN#NT OF DEVELOPMIa.i .-T SERVICES
BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION zh �(O/_/60
APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side:
APPLI ANT'S NAME ( If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:
OL CYST ai & /d
ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER (FOR OFFI(�U$E)
C r(A'S Avc,
NAME OF kROPOSED PROJECT If any � TELEPHONE_ Y g 3 O
LOC
A
TION OF PROJECT ( Major cross stregs and Address, if any )
`"1 I . Y_
GENERAL INFO ATION REQUIREDR,'w
>:<<:PINE
r.
:.
;.�;: .x...-::.' �...n:, ,�, %�:;;�:'�;•. �•::, �..,». ,..;,-;,:••,,.
��h4- :. >. n%>kas r:':�S',,.y.':-:{,'L�%:.a. r;. - .c_`�':, ., v.�3m4�i: ?,�'i =': ::v ..x.''';�:.... ..c.... ,<,.., ,.F�•z'�;:.=�..'
•zr..
::::... 4'�> ,. .. -.,- •..b, .:..,., >.. .; va>. :-i+�,.�ii: ::h= ..sic...: .a, .;>.; .,-.:>'„?x;ls:,:.;..w. i,,- :�,:�'d ^�'^'.'.;c.
:1y=
>>: ,
;.
^:
_j.
OWNER CERTIFICATION
I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF
THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE
(If an agent is to be authorised, execute as affidavit of authorisation and include Vedavit with this pficati
DATE: Z` �� SIGNATURE:
O R' S N - TELEPHONE ( f
ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE:
Ave-"
s�
ZONE VJRAL PLAN EXISTINLAND USE SITE SIZE in Square Feet or Aaes )
-J,vn ria I o r
EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet)
(Check One) (Check One)
[3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSPROPOSEDID TO BE SEWER� PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER
"PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC [3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER
APPLICATION REQUESTED
n
[3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 13 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
E3 REZONE [3 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
USE PERMIT E3 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP
7
[3 MINOR USE PERMIT~7xr�n_Ilt [3 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION
� ❑VARIANCE APR ' ' '996 [3 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION
Y.
E3 MINOR VARIANCE OI,O�rfSYy � [3 CERTIFICATE OF MERGER
[3 ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑MIoo
P.
NING AND RECLAMATION PLAN
i?
❑DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 1-3 OTHER
Y.-
i
s -� :-'•'��'' >' ` : u,� PROJECT' DESCRIPTION '
FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division ,describe the number an
"Y
d
size of parcels.) .
h
H
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
To Butte County, Department of Development Services;
U
Print Agent Name and Phone Number
Mailing Address
is hereby authorized to process this application for
on my property, identified as Butte County Assesors Parcel Numbers -.
This authorization allows representation for all applications,hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents
necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest.
Owner(s) of Record: (Sign and Print Name)
Pant Name _
Signature
Print Name
signanue
s
March 26, 1996
Q
We are requesting a use permit to operate a child care center with
a licensed capacity for 60 children. We will be using the salon
for the child care center and the residence to live in. We will
remove buildings from the back of the salon(garage) to the back end
of the property for playground space. The playground will be
surrounded by a 8ft fence. There are two buffer zones with a side
and back alley. We will be open from 6:45am to 6:00pm., monday
through friday. Children will be inside with exception of the
following outside times:
9:00am to 10:00am no more than 20 children outside
10:00am to 11:00am no more than 20 children outside
12:30pm to 1:30am no more than 18 children outside
3:00pm to .4:00pm no more than 18 children outside
4:00pm to 5:00pm no more than 20 children outside
Parking will be available in the front of the property. Children
arrive between 6:45am and 8:30am with two to three parents dropping
off at any one time. Drop offs will last five minutes or. less.
Parents will be picking up. their children between 1: OOpm and 6:OOpm
with two to three parents picking up at any one time. Pick ups
will last five minutes or less. Our licensed capacity breakdown
would be as follows:
Morning: Toddlers 6
preschoolers 40
Afternoon:' Toddlers 6
preschoolers 36
schoolage 18
All .18 schoolage children will be transported to the center in
center vehicle.
The pool in the front of the home will be inaccessible to'children
meeting licensing requirements.
The property has been the home of
years operating monday through
stylists. We feel a child care
for the ekisting building.
Gages Hair Salon for the past 45
saturday. and employing 24 hair
center is a very appropriate use
planriin fl 110�ilart cnt
APR 11 1996
Orovt;. , sal,
-- -- ALLEY
AD..(AGL�NT LOT
ACTT A PARTJ -1LAIII A PE
`
�L
septic CVo
NO
JS9RUMF A ISE
G,4RAGE r -
1IIW7H'
�Propose to remove existing garages and
N
back house with appurtances for
play yard for daycare. WCIVTY MAP
i
AC .SALE
1,91711 3430 sq. it.
'! BEAUTY Sf�
i=/E&5vrZaF G.49LAMLa7
� N
existing r 17./7ZAE L49F�GOVLL7C ALe
PAW I
Propose to use for daycare X ASAVYL /SjSVS7AG
septic facility plus add bathrooms HIrACT,gWPW
for children's use.
23'6 x 25 i 205.7 sq. ft... _
2nd Floor !
t Residence for owners of
S.11x � 'r 1 �,.J LL--.2tr 20
Daycare. (existing) --------'--
i
r- 2WALK
Pl�sa�d�re Mnt
P /10N771
APR 1 1 196
Parking - propose to use S'TE PLAN
RA -+ for handicapped Sr r _ =_��
OTS M a s 35? j77
0 •
� 1 1
COMMERCIAL BROKERAGE
April 30, 1996
Butte County Planning
c/o Stephen Hackney
County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Dear Stephen:
Two Wffliamsburg Lane
Chico, California 95926
916 / 895-3560
916 / 895.1803 FAX
Enclosed is the Enviromental Information Form. As you will notice,
I did not include the plans again, since you have so many with the
original package.
Please let me know if I can help you further.
Sincerely,
Linda Almlie
Broker/Associate
Enclosure
Planning Division
MAY 0 1 1996
®rovilis, Catiiornia
COUNTY OF BUTTE
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(To be Completed By Project Applicant)
Date Filed
General Information:
1. Na
�me�and address of owner,. and/or, developer, and/or project sponsor:�Cc
Z C• kr %�'Ut
2. Address of project I C[,� j 1,C�F ►l l� l P
Assessor's Parcel Number._ nn-; 60 SS a
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
CAM Coe 64-t --z,-7 4,1C . wia'-0) f -v-► 01.5926
List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including .
those required, by city, regional, state and federal agencies
E)dsting general plan designation:
EAsting zoning district p
How is land currently used? 10
8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): P"i , r I d rArc- c -P Ar
Project Description:
9. Site size: �lL[ �2y /4. ��1 ��7 , i'GU�C'AV`��� (AOf a Sq. Feet)
10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: / Compact: Total:
11. Plans attached Yes No "o n l ii anti.
12.
=13.
14.
Anticipated incremental or phased development ,/%�
0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0
1
A
Attach description of project containing the following Information:
15. If residential, include the number -of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of
household size expected.
16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales
area and loading facilities.
17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.
18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading
facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project
19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state
this and -indicate clearly why the application is required. -If permits have already been issued, please attach
as Exhibit
Are"the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items
checked yes (attach additional sheets as'necessary).
YES
20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons
or substantial alteration of ground contours. _
21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential
areas or public lands or roads. _
22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. _
23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. _
24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _
25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality
or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns.
26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels
in the vicinity.
.27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. _
28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials,
such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. _
29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services
.(police, fire, water, sewage, etc. Including special districts). _
30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption
(electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. _
V O Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O
2
NO
Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description)
32. Describe the projectsite as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability,
plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the
site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be
accepted.
33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
Historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land
use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, .
frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be
accepted.
Certification
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information
required -for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented
are true•and correct to the best of my kn5wledge and belief.
Date Signature for
K.\FORMS\ENV INFO
0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0
3
L: 003 353 013 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
WALLY RAYMOND C & LORRIE M
1924 LABURNUM AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 353 007
000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
0, -GAGE
LETA E LIVING
TRUST
0
GAGE LETA E TRUSTEE
1913 SPRUCE AVE
•
CHICO
CA
95926
0
L: 003 353 009
000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
0
NELSON DAVID R
& LINDSEY F
0
374 E 9TH AVE
0
CHICO
CA
95926
0
L: 003 353 008
000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
0
VIGIL RUDOLPH &
DIANE L
0'
1903 SPRUCE AVE
CHICO
CA
95926
!
L: 003 353 006
000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
0
PANEK JAMES W ETAL.
0
875 EL MONTE AVENUE
CHICO
CA
95928
0
L: 003 353 005
000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
•0
BRUCE DENNIS A
& SUSAN J
0
9 SAGEBRUSH CT
CHICO
CA
95926
!
L: 003 353 004
000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
' 0
WANNAMAKER DAVID
M
& JOLIENNE R
!
ck
385 E 10TH AVE
0
CHICO
CA
95926
jo '
.
L: 003 353 003
000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
0
PLUMB JEFF
0
379 E 10TH AVE
!
CHICO
CA
95926
0
L: 003 353 002
000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
'0
COLE ARLENE C
0
373 E 10TH AVE
0
CHICO
CA
95926
!
L: 003 353 013 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
WALLY RAYMOND C & LORRIE M
1924 LABURNUM AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 353 014 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
ADAMS ROBERT D & JEANNIE L
1936 LABURNUM AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 353 017 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
SCHLUTZ MINNIE LOUISE
355 E 10TH AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 353 018 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
MACNEILL CHRISTOPER A ETAL
BECHHOLD SCOTT & JODI
P 0 BOX 759
DURHAM CA 95938
L: 003 353 019 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
BRUBAKER KEITH W
1916 LABURNAM AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 353 020 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
STAPLE JOHN T ETAL
1904 LABURNUM
CHICO CA 95926
�,. L: 003 344 027 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
CHURCH OF CHRIST
2002 LABURNAM.AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 344 017 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
0 INCAUDO FAMILY TRUST
INCAUDO GARY ARNOLD & EVA ANNA TRUSTEE
346 LEGION AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 344 024 000
STATUS: ACTIVE
REICHENBERG JAMES E
& BENETTA M ETAL
P 0 BOX 416
JONESVILLE CA
96114
L: 003 344 025 000
STATUS: ACTIVE
CHANDLER WILLIAM C
& SALLY
.P
0 BOX 3336
CHICO CA
95927
I0
0
0
0
L: 003 361 014 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
COLLENTINE PAT
454 E 10TH AVE
CHICO CA
95926
L: 003 363 001 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
DEBON RICHARD
,
3351 HACKAMORE LANE
CHICO CA
95926
L: 003-363 002 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
EVANS ROBERT HARRISON
465 EAST 10TH AVE
0
CHICO CA
95926
L: 003 363 012 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
I*
SHAW CLIFFORD D & DOROTHY E FAMILY TRU
SHAW DOROTHY E TRUSTEE
460 EAST 9TH AVE
CHICO CA
95926
L: 003 363-615 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
r*
KLINDERA MARGARET E
.1902
SPRUCE AVENUE
CHICO CA
95926
L: 003 363 014 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
REEVES GLOWMA MAXINE SS
1916 SPRUCE ST
CHICO CA
95926
0
CM ,
9
0
E
•
0
•
115 K V LANE
CHICO CA 95928
L: 003 393 004 000 STATUS: ACTIVE 10
S STOVER HAZEL EILEEN
393 E 9TH AVE
CHICO CA 95926 9
0[ L: 003 393 005 000 STATUS: ACTIVE 10
WALLACE WALTER R & DONNA K
399 EAST 9TH AVE
`j�
CHICO CA 95926
L: 1010,3 ,36d 101 101010
bIHIUS:
f4LI iVt
ANDERSON DONALD C &
DONNA
1920 SPRUCE AVE
CHICO CA
95926
"'L--.003
381 016 0010
STATUS:
ACTIVE
0
JOHNSON EDMOND
455 E 9TH AVE
CHICO CA
95926
0
L: 003 393 001 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
SIERRA MANOR INVESTORS
C/O HIGNELL & HIGNELL PROPERTY
MANAGEM
1500 HUMBOLDT RD SUITE 1
CHICO CA
95928
r
003 393 003 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
4ofL:
SMITH KENNETH TOM &
JANE LESLIE
115 K V LANE
CHICO CA 95928
L: 003 393 004 000 STATUS: ACTIVE 10
S STOVER HAZEL EILEEN
393 E 9TH AVE
CHICO CA 95926 9
0[ L: 003 393 005 000 STATUS: ACTIVE 10
WALLACE WALTER R & DONNA K
399 EAST 9TH AVE
`j�
CHICO CA 95926
if 10
•l t 0
0
C
Pi
11
•1 10
•
�a.
L: 003 353 007 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
GAGE LETA E LIVING TRUST
GAGE LETA E TRUSTEE
1913 SPRUCE AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 353 009 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
NELSON DAVID R & LINDSEY F
374 E 9TH AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 353 008 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
VIGIL RUDOLPH & DIANE L
1903 SPRUCE AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L.: 003 353 006 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
.PANEK JAMES W ETAL
875 EL MONTE AVENUE
CHICO CA 95928
L: 003 353 005 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
BRUCE DENNIS A & SUSAN J
q SAGEBRUSH CT
._HTCn CA 95926
L: 003 353 004 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
WANNAMAKER DAVID M &: JOL'1 ENNE R
365 E 10TH AVE:
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 353 003 000 STATUS: ACTIVE:
PLUMB JEFF
379 E 10TH AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 353 002 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
COLE ARLENE C
373 E 10TH AVE
cH1Co CA 95926.
L: 003 353 013 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
WALLY RAYI IOND C & LORR I E M
1924 LABURNUM AVE
CHI'O CA 95926
L: 003 353 014 oOo STATUS: ACTIVE
ADAMS ROBERT D & JEANNIE L
1936 LABURNUM AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 353 017 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
SCHLUT2 MINNIE LOUISE
355 E 10TH AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 353 018 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
MACNEILL CHRISTOPER A ETAL
BECHHOLD SCOTT & JODI.
P 0 BOK 759
DURHAM CA 95938
L: 003 353 019 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
BRUBA.KER KEITH W
1916 LABURNAM AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 353 020 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
STAPLE JOHN T ETAL
1904 LABURNUM
CHICO CA 95926
L: '✓ 03 344 027 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
CHURCH OF CHRIST
2002 LABURNAM AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 344 017 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
iNCAUDO FAMILY TRUST
INCAUDO GARY ARNOLD & EVA ANNA TRUSTEE
346 LEGION AVE
CHICO CA 95926
L: 003 344 024 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
REICHENBERG JAMES E & BENETTA "I ETAL
P U BOX 416
JONESVILLE CA 96114
L: 003 344 025 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
CHANDLER W I LL I AM C & SALLY
P 0 BOX 3336
"HIL'0 CA 95927
L: 003 361 014 000 STATUS:
ACTIVE
L: 003 363 015 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
'. COLLENTINE PAT
ANDERSON DONALD C &
DONNA
454 E 10TH AVE
1920 SPRUCE AVE
CHICO CA 95926
CHICO CA
95926
L: 003 363 001 000 STATUS:
ACTIVE
L: 003 381 016 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
DEBON RICHARD
JOHNSON EDMOND
3351 HACKAMORE LANE
455 E 9TH AVE
CHICO CA 95926
CHICO CA
95926
L: 003 363 002 000 STATUS:
ACTIVE
L: 003 393 001 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
EVANS ROBERT HARRISON
SIERRA MANOR INVESTORS
C/0 HIGNELL & HIGNELL PROPERTY
MANAGEM
465 EAST 10TH AVE
1500 HUMBOLDT RD SUITE
1
CHICO CA 95926
CHICO CA
95920
L • 003 363 012 000 STATUS:
ACTIVE
L: 003 393 OO S 000
STA I"U' , :
ACT I VE
SHAW CLIFFORD D"& DOROTHY E FAMILY TRU
SMiTH KENNETH TOM &
JANE LESLIE
SHAW DOROTHY E TRUSTEE
460 EAST 9TH AVE
115 .." V LANE
CHICO CA 95926
CHICO CA
95928
L: 003 363 013 000 STATUS:
ACTIVE
L: 003 393 004 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
KLINDERA MARGARET E
STOVER HAZEL EILEEN
1902 SPRUCE AVENUE
393 E 9TH AVE
CHICO CA 95926
CHICO CA
95926
L: 003 363 014 000 STATUS:
ACTIVE
L.: 003 393 005 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
REEVES GLOWMA MAXINE SS
WALLACE WALTER R &
DONNA K
1916 SPRUCE ST
399 EAST 9TH AVE
CHICO CA 95926
CHICO CA
95926
July 18, 1996
Post -it'" brand fax trins-miftaT m1111111111690 7671
I # of pages ►
TO
-
From rn�
RDept.
C07Co. Co .
Phone
Fax4'
e -
4,�O 11. of ,
loops Bei
Department of DeyelopmentJSej
,ax 9
7 County center..-lDrive.-
Oroville,.CA 95965-3397 L
Planning Division Supervisor:
We are writingin, our frustration"o' 'erl'e
r. e� exp
for the use: permit 9�47,18--
f
1. We came: intoe the planning ..de ar o" lhd,,-ot
�t
permit process •:and pick . up'�- the -1,:! .4,
papoj�,,T,- work.1; At
explained our project'. and was told. b i. -Stephen .Ii`
project would have a., -"rd time'j-�'re- 4 wipp
IV1 b5
. 1, T ON R
department*.:- He.' tolSZboth' 6'uir a it 67? , - and its se
N',4 ' _,il
iv -the o J e con"
times his-ne.gat'. e views on c V. He Ve
.6-1.
wanted it" bad enough;'� we would fi�ave- ii!�' jump': the,
aware of., - local."' procedures 7'a n d "" i't h a tT. -,--.-o f t e r i`time 1'
" .%. ._ . - dep' i vV,
commission-,.* wili:-.�, over."- ride the '�'plandi�g�` artm4
decided to try. "We knew full we 1 t had','w would no,
-noney returned if the"project.wai�'.unsuccessi:ulI
2 W h e n ',w e.-'.' f irsts with-, Step -Hackney., te-.:fin
told us they application process was $1286,;'00. - He>
Zrs
an t 0 Id
�.ras non-refundable. d. -the coun Y, -.w u .-,rd`turzVan`�H
-ninus s
th6i' cose"'..
114
3. When 'we"E"'siub ifi i t t e d",.`t h e,, application; "_- 1 6PMi. ;i. K a 6 k ne
ween assigned ouk', case.. and,,was not 'very _*-happy ,� t o"I,
project. �i;E�,�t
were-7.-suiprised -6y ]i i s ,, o4' r a I rk n ati.
are concerned . it may have affected; -"6ur,gp I af
p. ic 1 o Qq
o.4.
V
c 81" d :'.'Understand why cknil
4. We could not. Mil.t.'H�L hadl-a--he
when he
fi�i'd'.i. not even .!;seen'the, pKoperty..:vtq,� After al
',iad been."us'dd as;-.a.,.comm - 6rciar-.busi , ness or. 50 Y'e a
time Mr:i:F.Hackneyi pos'ed". a-,-. P'i6�16. with 3the
-propeft;
'4� . -117-9
ome; t
, v. r y i_-_Z;_'tq
nim if �V �id _e- e" ou7 andl seen t qq � d
a fi "r'a
d' valid= li
•
problems=; posed' -:were: :actuaidy:'.'
ms.'
been t o o.,.' b =He always
ndtl!
y to;,,come'Tout. To- this d ido-'nd
yaw the p rib4p o s e d t` s i t e`j'.
5. We were extremely.- disappointed when, -'the ..septi
..he stumbling block on the project. When we`learn
_mprove the septic system and hooking.`.up to `sews
Available' for several years,
we,,, decided z. to witi
arocess '' On-•. May --21st' we all6d,,,,�.i,��Stephe Ha"
C' n
1.3
-
)roceedings-'and at this time he zs"aid hd..%hadn t ft!
.lis cl-iardVs'� yet,`but we should reteiv4-,"iiound,..$800:
'T
G.
cel of applyi::g*
bout tae u e,
2
that
f time; -.-e-'
,,'. i n'-e'y` that", t. -.e
im;he
araBi" , di -f -,--6re:.t
, 41
.A,
a iVK, to lis if
e -
4,�O 11. of ,
loops Bei
g
ff,the pla
g
e
getCall of of
r
abut -j',- costs',
jAiff'.- bd $288.
0
'A. -�Vq ;:
used portio:s
n�
0A S! us n9`W
5�
irig elie
tn ,a
,-, �.attitiidt",3' r d
o pif acce t
p ancc
11414 fX�
dtlVe attifuc:e�,z',:
propert y".
tir-?mOrra!;, Eve e,..* y{<I,
we -would ask z
thee" he F: eL4
oldiis `�'h e ;'
slieve he e E r -
iisiem Y_,ecan a
we
qould','n(_
:would 'not
0t
lr*qw:,', f rom,..th a
kfie7A._'1_. to :halt,;
t Y e4 r'
-fin`all c tr
ib'2 �--"We -th6n
4-:
;.V
rt
fV
asked if he.'had..gone to. see the: prop and ,-#ie, I AJ—d-4 ` We told
. .
him not to do anything e1se.at tp,'"Y$� .
erstand our
surprise when we were told we were -r fvingl$4, 0 50,:.
IT
ti
6. We feel Mr. Hackney's negative attit�ude* was azproblem from:
he
start, but felt that a public officI�j
'l such should 'do
everything in their power to facilit4t ia (ju e
members. rc public
7. Furthermore,- we understand regulations requir)Ly4'-`g.'#-ewer hookL os
for the project, but feel the' Nitralte, b:'o'-* t-, spot�'-lssHg.-was-not looked
_';
at closely considering the' whole"area -,ld, rpquIr4d-:'&.I'be hooked -ip
to sewer in the next few ye'ars- and perhaps a vapiapce could De
issued for fewer children until we coii14-c t tW.
onnect't-Vi sewer.
Overall, we were very disheirtened -by"Ithe"'wh' le�-,,"'p;,Pcedure at how
our project was handled and 'for the •"amoi;:�u'n't"'-ofl"%�ohel(,��'ii�', took to r-j�
for .30 little work done. We wonder how anyone decides to put- a
business in the county of Chico/Butte when.you are' told from t` -,e
;)egi,,ining You will have to jump the hoops' if yo"u''.want it bad
-3nough? The last time we checked, the county!on -support
-r .
from the public- - e
us! Why do we have to'subject ouplq�4�s to su-h
k 0
stiff, unb6nding- regulations.and harassp-'# nt, whenrwe'.a �1 & trying -.o
A� ounty that
-bring a much needed service of childcare intoes'
Jesperately needs it!
ge have discussed these issues with Mr.' Hackney and he
ever quoting money involved and that he-indeed'spi 6
on the project. Therefore, we have-co
;p,,f to azI.',. implv.§
a
letter to you. We would like. to:sta�if'-.'he
pr&ceqs,,.
' ;:- "
.-noney returned even the' $*510.50, but"didritt, fe6i
wel-cqu
general claim form because we don't fd6i thel'"c I'aim�-i J
correct as 'stated". We would appreciate your
natter. Also, we have documentation off" every .,coziv"�"
s
lith Stephen Hackney.
V
4e did p4rchasel.the 1913 SpKuce,,
.,.Aven,4,ea-0ro e�
p
iook into ' the sewer, `we willlagain a for a.0
s 3
:hill care center.
incerely,-
usan J. Blickle
lake A. Roath
has Ien-'.-d
of of tii,,e
�jhence the
6tt'ing oi.r
a sign t.e
true a,d
n __s
Lon,, i... -e hl;;d
en.,we cEin
,mit for a
T
CLAIMANT:
ADDRESS:
CITY & STATE:
DATE OF CLAIM:
COUNTY OF BUTTE
Oroville, California
GENERAL CLAIM
Blake Roath
1913 Spruce Avenue
Chico, CA 95926
September 5, 1996
�i
SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES
DATE DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM (DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY)
9-5-96 Use Permit, File UP 96-18, - REFUND "
IMPORTANT.
SEE INSTRUCTIONS
ON REVERSE SIDE
AMOUNT
$510. 1 50
TOTAL 1 $510. 150 11
I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and that this claim is true and
correct as stated.
Dated this day of 19�, at ��l /%l� Calif..
Signature of Claimant
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above have been performed or delivered and that
there is a Budget Appropriation [)OC] or Specific Board Approval [ ] (Check one) for the same.
Dated this 1 ( TM day of �� Q T , 19_±L,at L I t Calif.
Department Head or Authorized Deputy
Dept. Code 480-001 Exp. Code 4210900 PAYABLE FROM GENERAL FUND
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - AUDITOR'S USE ONLY
DEPT. & SUB. PROJ. SUB. OBJ. CLAIM NO. INV. NO. INV. DATE ENCUMB. GROSS AMT.
` r
Date 09/11/96 Development Services Departmn t
Time 2:36 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 1
UP 96-18 * Blake Roath
1826 Citrus Avenue
Chico, CA 95926
In reference to : Use Permit, AP#003-353-007,010
Rounding : None
Full Precision : No
Last bill / / Last aging
Last charge 06/13/96
Last payment / / Amount $0.00
Date/Slip#
Description
HOURS/RATE
AMOUNT TOTAL
04/08/96
Paula L. / P
0.25
14.75
#8377
Processing
59.00
04/08/96
Linda / C
2.25
76.50
#8435
Clerical
34.00
04/08/96
Craig / P
0.25
14.75
#8458
Processing
59.00
04/08/96
Steve H / P
0.50
29.50
#8474
Processing
59.00
04/22/96
Larry / P
1.00
59.00
#8492
Processing
59.00
05/20/96
Steve H / P
4.00
236.00
#8757
Processing
59.00
06/03/96
Steve H / P
1.00
59.00
#8981
Processing
59.00
TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES
9.25
$489.50
TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS
$0.00
TOTAL NEW CHARGES
PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS
04/09/96 Deposit - Receipt #15344
09/12/96 Refund/Claim Form to Auditor
(1,000.00)
510.50
$489.50
Date 09/11/96 felvelopment Services Depa' Aint
Time 2:36 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet
UP 96-18 * :Blake Roath (continued)
TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS
NEW BALANCE
Page 2
($489.50)
TOTAL NEW BALANCE $0.00
DIRECTOR'S OFFICE
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: 19161 538-7601
FAX: 19161 538-7785
August 21, 1996
Susan J. Blickle
Blake A. Roath
1913 Spruce Avenue
Chico, CA 95926
Re: Response to your letter of July 18, 1996, concerning Use Permit File # 96-18
Dear Ms. Blickle & Mr. Roath:
Thank you for your correspondence. of July 18, 1996. 1 can understand your frustration in this matter, particularly
when circumstances are such that you were unable to achieve the result you desired. I have looked into this
matter at great length, discussed the process and procedures with the case planner, Stephen Hackney, and feel
that at this time, the proper result of your application has been achieved. Perhaps sometime in the future, when
there is City sewer available for your project, you will want to submit an application for the day care use.
discussing your letter with Mr. Hackney, it appears there are a number of discrepancies in the sequence of
events. Throughout your letter you refer to your meeting with Mr. Hackney. In fact, he's never met either of you.
He worked with your real estate agent, Ms. Linda Almlie, thoughout this process. This being the case, it would
appear your perceptions of Mr. Hackney's attitude and manner in which he processed your application is
predicated upon what was related to you through Ms. Almlie. My understanding is that Mr. Hackney has only
spoken to you once or twice by telephone. He expressed the concern that perhaps your agent, Ms. Almlie, might
not be keeping you informed of the issues/concerns related to your application.
From current and past experience, I know how Mr. Hackney is conscientious in explaining potential issues to
applications when he is at the counter. Our submittal requirements call for the planner to discuss such matters
with each applicant. One of the reasons for this is to avoid just the situation you apparently have experienced —
to get part way through the process only to have to withdraw your application. The cause leading to your
decision — Environmental Health requirements regarding septic service — is one of the principle issues Mr.
Hackney discussed with Ms. Almlie from the outset. It would appear, evidenced by the record of material in the
file, that had your agent, Ms. Almlie, seriously considered Mr. Hackney's concern about the issues inherent with
your project, you would have saved yourself the monies that were spent in pressing forward with this project — at
the insistence of both your agent and yourself (by phone).
To clarify, in general terms, the nature of work performed in processing an application, a variety of duties are
required to be performed. These include:
■ Reviewing the application for completeness;
■ Comment letter is sent to various agencies (30 days to comment);
■ Reviewing the application to determine whether it constitutes a "project" under CEQA;
■ Reviewing/researching the General Plan designation and zoning to see if the request is consistent;
■ Reviewing/researching any other planning documents, e.g., Specific Plans, specific urban development
standards, etc., to see if the request is consistent;
■ Reviewing/researching environmental documents, e.g., soil surveys, vegetative surveys, County
constraints maps, etc., which all of these elements must be addressed in order to begin an
environmental analysis of the application;
0 Site survey: case planner must go out to the project site to ground -verify map characteristics; to check
CI
for such things as types & numbers of structures, their location or proposed location vis-a-vis setbacks;
any surface water features, e.g., for presence of vernal pools ; compatibility of surrounding land uses;
types of vegetation, e.g., presence of any rare or endangered species such as the Butte County
Meadowfoam; any wildlife habitat or signs of wildlife, e.g., presence of buckbrush and deer scat to
indicate presence of resident or migratory deer; geometric features of road system accessing the project
site - for safety reasons; and so forth. All of this is necessary in order to write an adequate Initial Study;
■ Case planner writes Initial Study (Environmental Checklist) as required by CEQA; this work is
reviewed/proofread by the Senior Planner; Initial Study goes back to the case planner for any necessary
editing; Initial Study is sent to applicant for review (15 days);
■ Case planner writes staff report; all this while comments are received; case planner incorporated
recommended conditions of approval into report;
■ Staff Report is reviewed by Senior Planner, returned to case planner; any editing necessary is
performed; report is submitted to clerical who proofreads report and sends report to the Director of
Development Services for final'review; if any additional editing is required the report is returned to the
case planner for editing, then the report is given to the secretary for publishing;
■ Case planner attends public hearing on the project.
Within the parameters of these processing steps, every project has its own characteristics that may require
additional specific attention. In the case of your project, this process was not brought to a conclusion, but a
number of these processes were carried out. Discussion was held by Mr. Hackney with other staff, with staff
from other agencies, and periodically with your representative, Ms. Almlie, either in person or by telephone.
Time spent in these activities was tracked and noted, to be billed against your deposit. As to the amount of the
billing, neither Mr. Hackney, nor any case planner working on a project would be able to tell an applicant what
will be the cost at any given point in the process. There are other people involved with different billing rates. And
if he has not totalled his own hours — as you point out in your letter — then he would be unable to even tell -you
what are his costs. There apparently has been a misunderstanding in this matter between your agent, Ms.
Almlie, and Mr. Hackney.
I have read Mr. Hackney's letter to you, July 3, 1996, and his concluding paragraph is one of empathy with the
purpose and intent of your application. I believe his comments speak to his attitude regarding your application.
I regret you feel disheartened and frustrated with the process. That is part of the reason we want the planners to
discuss potential issues with applicants right from the beginning, and to explain the permit process at the same
time.
I wish you.well in your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
iam Farrel
Director of Development Services
k:VettersNroath.ltr
0 0.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bill Farrel, Development Services Director
FROM: Stephen Hackney
SUBJECT: Matters related to refund of Blake Roath Use Permit 96-18
DATE: July 8, 1996
SUMMARY: Telephone conversation this a.m. with Linda Almlie. She was upset that I contradicted her
impression/perception of our previous conversations with her client. The issue is the amount being refunded
the applicant.
DISCUSSION: In the course of our phone conversation, Linda and I disagreed on whether I had ever given
her a specific or general dollar amount as to how much her client should expect in a refund. Linda says I told
her around $800 would be refunded to her client, and she passed this figure along to her client, Susan
Blakeley. I told Linda that I not only never gave her a dollar figure, but that I never would give anyone a dollar
figure. I have no way of knowing, that in our previous phone conversation, when she asked me, I told her I
would have to total my hours first and that there is clerical time. This a.m. I reminded Linda of this, and asked
her, isn't it logical that I would be in no position to give her a dollar figure when at the time she asked I didn't
know my own time spent on the project, nor did I know the time clerical had spent, and would possibly need
to spend to close the file. Linda's response was to maintain that I had told her around $800. So we were at
an impasse.
Linda continued to complain about the amount charged, claimed that no way had any of this time and effort
been spent on this project, and that the County charges too much for processing its projects.
I told Linda that I thought it ironic that she was complaining about the refund when from the very beginning, from
the day she first brought the application in, that I advised her to consider not submitting it for reasons I specified
(traffic, accesslegress, parking, septic, etc.). I reminded her that on at least two occasions I recommended that
she advise her clients to consider withdrawing their application and save the money for further processing.
Even after Environmental Health sent their letter requiring hookup to City sewer, I initiated the phone call to
Linda informing her of this and again suggesting they consider withdrawing their application. I think it was about
two weeks later she called and asked that the application be withdrawn. I asked her for a letter for the file to
that affect, which she sent the next day.
I told Linda that I could understand where she was coming from - she is in real estate and she has a client.
From where I am coming from was from a planning perspective that was grounded in a concern regarding the
health & safety of children at the proposed day care.
Linda made the comment/statement that she felt/the client felt that I was biased against the project from the
very beginning. I told Linda that it was my responsibility to look at the potential impacts of an application and
inform the applicant of any potential problems/issues. At the same time, I clearly said it was the applicant's right
to submit an application. Further, my feelings about this project have nothing to do with conditions/requirements
of other agencies. What really has stopped this project, at this point, is Environmental Health's requirements
for hookup to City sewer.
Linda continued to claim that I was biased against her client's project, that the costs did not warrant the effort
spent, that her logs indicated I said $800, etc. I said I had no control of whatever words she wrote in her logs
at any given time, but reiterated to her that I had not ever given her a dollar figure. We ended in complete
disagreement. She characterized my letter to her client as being critical of her. I offered to fax a copy of the
letter -which I have done -and include it for your perusal. I think it a fair and accurate appraisal of the situation.
0 Butte County 0 Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 -
July 3, 1996
Susan Blakeley
!826 Citrus Avenue
Chico, CA 95926
Re: Costs related to processing Use Permit 96-18
Dear Ms. Blakeley:
6,atte Co
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601
FAX: (916) 538-7785
Enclosed is a Billing Worksheet of the time & people who have worked on the Use Permit. Regarding issues you
mentioned in our phone conversation the other day:
1. I did not ever give Linda Almlie a dollar figure as to what the refund would be. As I explained to you in our
phone conversation, I would have no way of knowing the time other people would spend, or had spent, in processing this
application.
2. The issue of time that has elapsed. Linda was told the processing timeline for Use Permits is 3 to 4 months.
This is standard information we give all applicants. The file indicates Planning Division received your application April
11. Linda's letter requesting withdrawal was received June 19. The entire time from submission to withdrawal request
is two months, one week. Your project has not been subjected to any longer time frame than what your agent was told.
3. I had attempted to spell out clearly and concisely to Linda all the potential problems inherent in this specific
project. From the very day she submitted the original application -- which I returned to her for corrections -- I advised
her that it would probably be very difficult to get a recommendation for approval to the Planning Commission based on
the information and description of the project. When she returned several days later with a revised map and description,
I again tried to encourage her to reconsider -- and save the client their time and money -- in an application I didn't feel
confident would get a recommendation for approval from Planning. I happened to be assigned the project later that
week or the next. During the course of working on the project, I called Linda twice to encourage her to speak to her
client and consider withdrawing the application, thereby saving further processing costs. The first time I recommended
this to her, Linda flatly stated that she was confident any problems could be resolved and that the client wanted the
County to continue processing the project. The second time I called Linda, after receiving Environmental Health's
comments regarding the need to hook up to City sewer, Linda said she would talk to the client and get back to me.
Approximately two weeks later she called and asked that we withdraw the application. I asked her to send us a letter, for
the file, and confirm the client's (your) desire to withdraw the application. We received the letter shortly thereafter.
I can understand your sense of frustration with the circumstances, i.e., expending money in an unsuccessful endeavor. -I
was concerned this might be the result from the first day when Linda brought the application into our office. My advice
was ignored. I empathize with what you are doing and attempting to achieve -- filling a need for quality child care
facilities in Chico. As a father of two young children, one of whom is in preschool, I recognize this need. I wish you
future success in your endeavors in establishing such facilities.
If you have further questions regarding any aspects of the reasons for the expenditures incurred please feel free to call
me at 538-760.
Sincerely,
Stephen ackney
Associate Planner
j:Ueftm\susanb.Itr
Post -It'" brand fax Aittal memo 7671 I# of pages 0 -
July
July 3, 1996
Susan Blakeley
!826 Citrus Avenue
Chico, CA 95926
Re: Costs related to processing Use Permit 96-18
Dear Ms. Blakeley:
Enclosed is a Billing Worksheet of the time & people who have worked on the Use Permit. Regarding issues you
mentioned in our phone conversation the other day:
1. I did not ever give Linda Almlie a dollar figure as to what the refund would be. As I explained to you in our
phone conversation, I would have no way of knowing the time other people would spend, or had spent, in processing this
application.
2. The issue of time that has elapsed. Linda was told the processing timeline for Use Permits is 3 to 4 months.
This is standard information we give all applicants. The file indicates Planning Division received your application April
11. Linda's letter requesting withdrawal was received June 19. The entire time from submission to withdrawal request
is two months, one week. Your project has not been subjected to any longer time frame than what your agent was told.
3. I had attempted to spell out clearly and concisely to Linda all the potential problems inherent in this specific
project. From the very day she submitted the original application -- which I returned to her for corrections -- I advised
her that it would probably be very difficult to get a recommendation for approval to the Planning Commission based on
the information and description of the project. When she returned several days later with a revised map and description,
I again tried to encourage her to reconsider -- and save the client their time and money -- in an application I didn't feel
confident would get a recommendation for approval from Planning. I happened to be assigned the project later that
week or the next. During the course of working on the project, I called Linda twice to encourage her to speak to her
client and consider withdrawing the application, thereby saving further processing costs. The first time I recommended
this to her, Linda flatly stated that she was confident any problems could be resolved and that the client wanted the
County to continue processing the project. The second time I called Linda, after receiving Environmental Health's
comments regarding the need to hook up to City sewer, Linda said she would talk to the client and get back to me.
Approximately two weeks later she called and asked that we withdraw the application. I asked her to send us a letter, for
the file, and confirm the client's (your) desire to withdraw the application. We received the letter shortly thereafter.
I can understand your sense of frustration with the circumstances, i.e., expending money in an unsuccessful endeavor. I
was concerned this might be the result from the first day when Linda brought the application into our office. My advice
was ignored. I empathize with what you are doing and attempting to achieve -- filling a need for quality child care
facilities in Chico. As a father of two young children, one of whom is in preschool, I recognize this need. I wish you
future success in your endeavors in establishing such facilities.
If you have further questions regarding any aspects of the reasons for the expenditures incurred please feel free to call
me at 538-760.
Sincerely,
Stephen Hackney
Associate Planner
j Aletteis\susanb.Itr
LOWEN REAL ESTATE OR BILL SMITH 4 5387785
Planning Division
JUN 19 1896
UfuV1110, 'sWjFurfidkt
Two Williamsburg Lane • Chico, California 95926 • (916) 695-3560
TO: Stephen Hackney
FROM: Linda Almlie
DATE: . June 19, 1996
NO. 730 D.=+. _
I have been advised by may client, Blake Roth, so ask for a
discontinuance of the USE PERMIT, the reason being the septic
cannot be improved to a full working, capacity for a daycare and it
would be cost prohibitive to bring in the sewer.
Please refund all unused monies along with an accounting of the
used portion to Blake Roth asap.
LEAD -IN SHEET
FILE NO: UP 96-18 AP# 003-353-007 & 10
APPLICANT: gomi, Rlake 1826 Citrus Ave., Chico, CA 95926
Name Address
OWNER: Leta Gage, 1913 Spruce, Chico, CA 95926
Name Address
RESPRESENTATIVE: None
Name Address
SIZE: (9.!2q ct-c'"_
• • ii��►�! a � ��L•�`/.�IiIL'��laili►]i'%GI,�1�� • �-
SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT # = EXISTING ZONING: —
ZONING HISTORY:- 'z, - Z. 7 -,0 CP t. , -tJ A b � )
SURROUNDING ZONING: �.
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: i n Q Aiam„ 1 A^ti U 4fid n AA E 4
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
k:\forms\lead-in
U/' ytey dee Pie,
P 1 1 199
of®V1ild,`. Ul.* �sPBi9a
0 0
CONEMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST
APPLICATION: Use Permit oath Rlaka TTP 96-1R
DATE: ri l 11, 1995
County Offices and Cities:
Chief Administrative Officer X_
Develop. Services Director
X_ Public Works Director
_
X Environmental Health Director X_
Planting Manager
_ Building Manager
X Sheriff _
BCAG
_ ALUC
LAFCo
APCD
Butte Co. Fano Bureau
Biggs _
Gridley
Chico
Oroville
Paradise
_ Chico Airport Commission
_
X_ Agricultural Commission
Irrigation District:
_ Butte Water _
_ OWID _
Table Mountain Irrigation
Domestic Water
Butte Water District
OWID _
Sewer
_ Butte Water District
Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21)
Fire Protection
_X_ California Department of Forestry _
Recreation Districts
_ Chico Area Recreation _
Paradise Recreation & Park
Utilities
PG&E North - Chico _
PG&E South - Oroville
State Agencies
_ CalTrans
Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter) _
Central Reg. Water Quality Control
Department of Conservation _
Federal Agencies
US Forest Service
Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc.
_ Lime Saddle Dist
Drainage _
_ Reclamation _
Butte Co. Mining Committee
Biggs/W. Gridley Water _
Paradise Irrigation
Thermalito Irrigation
Durham Irrigation
Richvale Irrigation
Other
California Water Service Co. _ Del Oro Water Co.
Thermalito Irrigation District _ Other
Themalito Irrigation _ Sterling City Sewer Main
L.O.A. PUD
El Medio Fire Protection District
Durham Area Recreation _ Feather River Rec. & Park
Richvale Recreation & Parks
Chambers Cable TV _ Pacific Bell
Viacom Cable TV
Dept of Water Resources _ Dept of Fish and Game
Dept of Parks and Rec. _ Highway Patrol
Off. of Mining Reclamation _ Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations
US Bureau of Land Management
Community Association _ Mosq. Abatement Oroville/Butte Cc
Butte Env.l Council _ Paradise Pines Com.
Cal Native Plant Society _
17
INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Stephen Hackney, Planning
FROM: Micha l erta, Environmental Health, Chico
SUBJECT: Blake Roath, UP 96-18, AP# 3-353-007
DATE: May 22, 1996
Applicant's proposal would generate sewage that would far exceed the
amount allowed under the septic Tank Prohibition Order and Nitrate Action
Plan. In fact, it is questionable whether an approved septic system
sized to accommodate the projected sewage could be physically placed on-
site.
Suggest the.following conditions:
1. Prior to issuance of any building permit or health permit, abandon
septic tanks (under Environmental Health permit), and connect the
dwellings to public sewer.
MH/gl/land/roath
a
- BUTTE.COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
`PLANNING DIVISION
ENVIROWMENV` 7 % fliF „",
APP 4rnw
Chico, Califomia
TO: Environmental Health Director: Gail Lawrence
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager - ---'
RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Blake Roath, UP 96-18
DATE: April 18,1996 PLANNER: Stephen Hackney .5-,?—
g •76 J i
We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application for
completeness and, if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days
of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your
department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested.
Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a
call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an application for Use Permit to operate a child care center with a licensed capacity for 60 children on property
zoned R-1 ( Residential 1 acre parcel ) located on 1913 Spruce Ave. Chico, between 9th and 10th Avenue , identified
as APN 003-353-007 10 . It is'within Supervisorial District No. R-1 .
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
X PLANNING COMMISSION. _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
ON Au s«g t 22 , 1996.
YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN Mav 3 , 1996. IFNO COMMENTS OR
COMMUNICATIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YOUHA ISE NONE.
COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary):
• bio
1amning DIVISIon
•
MAY
'L ivw
� 9 A �AAn
7 -
k:\forms\comment.fim 10-16-95 BKH
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785
L
Development Services
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM MAY 0 21996
Oroville, Caiifornia
TO: Environmental Health Staff
FROM: Tom Reid, Director
SUBJECT: Large Family Day Care Homes, Review of Minor Use Permit Applications
DATE: April 22, 1996
We have in the past requested sewage system enlargements as a Large Family Day
Care Home Use Permit condition of approval.
Because the Health and Safety Code (see attached) limits the imposition of additional
standards for the approval of Large Family Day Care facilities, please in the future
proceed as follows:
1. If the septic system is sized for the number of existing bedrooms, do not
require expansion of the leachfield.
2. If the septic system is failing, require repair both as a violation and as a
condition of approval.
3. As a condition of approval, please recommend "comply with the Butte County
Code Section 19-4 that prohibits septic system failure or nuisance".
TR/mlf
Attachment
BUTTE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
TO: Public Works Director
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager
RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Blake Roath, UP 96-18
DATE: April 18,1996 PLANNER: Stephen Hackney
We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application for
completeness and , if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days
of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your
department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested.
Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a
call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an application for Use Permit to operate a child care center with a licensed capacity for 60 children on property
zoned R-1 ( Residential 1 acre parcel ) located on 1913 Spruce Ave., Chico, between 9th and 10th Avenue , identified
as APN 003-353-007 10 . It is within Supervisorial District No. R- l .
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
ON Au sug t 22, 1996.
YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN May 3 ,1996. IFNO COMMENTS OR
COMMUNICATIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YOUHAVE NONE.
COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary):
/
W, 4, rsea -r �/ w, 4 ✓a k ltrt s 1,4 / A -k /,t
u.G(�, / S /J/ya00iGN Lt, t �'-�i s Q.tttdS �fW H-4 /[.�S �By /P.�S A� �Oi✓� .
2 W/�
r IV
3 rw,�ivvr GK e Sfrr� f �� lr /2 �v� lea;�or 44- S.oryt e
A -
I0
k:\foims\comment.fim 10-16-95 BKH
Date: 4 A 4 A r
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785
NQ 1N3Wd013A30 aNVI
3Ung AO UNf100
9661 Z Z ddd
®3n1333H
•
BUTTE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
TO: Development Services Director
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager
RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Blake Roath, UP 96-18
DATE: April 18, t996 PLANNER: Stephen Hackney
We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application for
completeness and, if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days
of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your
department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested.
Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a
call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an application for Use Permit to operate a child care center with a licensed capacity for 60 children on property
zoned R-1 ( Residential 1 acre parcel ) located on 1913 Spruce Ave., Chico, between 9th and 10th Avenue . , identified
as APN 003-353-007 10 . It is within Supervisorial District No. R-1 .
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
ON August t 22 , 1996.
YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN May 3 ,1996. IFNO COMMENTS OR
COMMUNICATIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YOUHAVE NONE.
COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary):
k:\forms\comment.frm 10-16-95 BKH
APR 3 U 9896
7 County Center Drive'- Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785
•
BUTTE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
TO: Butte County Planning Manager
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager
RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Blake Roath, UP 96-18
DATE: April 18,1996 PLANNER: Stephen Hackney
We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application for
completeness and , if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days
of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your
department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested.
Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a
call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an application for Use Permit to operate a child care center with a licensed capacity for 60 children on property
zoned R-1 ( Residential 1 acre parcel j located on 1913 Spruce Ave., Chico, between 9th and IOth Avenue , identified
as APN 003-353-007 10 . It is within Supervisorial District No. R- l .
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
ON August 22, 1996.
YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN May 3 ;1996. IFNO COMMENTS OR
COMMUNICATIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YO UHA 1B NONE.
COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary):
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
BUTTE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Chico `----�
Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager
Request for Comments on a Development Application: Blake Roath, UP 96-18
April 18,1996 PLANNER: Stephen Hackney
We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application for
completeness and , if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days
of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your
department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested.
Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a
call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an application for Use Permit to operate a child care center with a licensed capacity for 60 children on property
zoned R-1 ( Residential 1 acre parcel ) located on 1913 Spruce Ave., Chico, between 9th and 10th Avenue , identified
as APN 003-353-007 10 . It is within Supervisorial District No. R-1 .
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
ON August 22, 1996.
YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN May 3 ,1996. IFNO COMMENTS OR
COMMUNICATIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YOUHAVE NONE.
COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary):
Vhf '
Date:
k:\forms\comment.frm 10-16-95 BKH
P!m-mirin fi'-r-trtmr- t
MAY 0 1 1996
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785
Paeific Gas and Electriclompany 460 Rio Lindo Avenue' Won Chambers
Chico, CA 95926 Chico Land Rights Office
916/894-4423
FAX 916/894-4737
April 29, 1996
Mr. Barry K. Hogan
Butte County
Department of Development Services
Planning Division
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
RE: Use Permit for Child Care Center-Roath
FILE: UP #96-18
Dear Mr. Hogan:'
In regards to the subject project; please be advised that PG&E has no objections with regards
to our facilities. However, prior to opening the center for operation the gas service will need
to be upgraded to school codes, which involves reviewing the meter set location, installing
monitor regulation, and a curb fire shutoff valve. The costs associated with this work will be
at the owners expense.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this matter. If you have any questions, please call me
at 894-4423.
Please refer all future matters of this nature to my attention at the above letterhead address in
lieu of Al Sunahara.
Sincerely,
Donald W. Chambers'
Land Agent
(file: UP96-18.ltr)
Planning Division
MAY 0 1 1996
®towiie, cajifo nia
LOWEN REAL ESTATE ,
COMMERCIAL BROKERAGE
Two Williamsburg Gane
Chico, California 95926
(916) 8953560
(916) 895.1803 FAX
DATE:
TO:
COMPANY:
► FAX COVER LETTER •
FROM., Linda Almlie LOWEN REAL__ESTATE
ITEMS FAXED:
TO FAX #:
ORIGINALS/COPIES TO BE MAILED:
MESSAGE:
# OF PAGES SENT:
YES LJ NO
This FAX is sent from (916) 895-1.803. If there are any problems in receiving, please call Pat (916) 895-3560.
05/15/96
Li -fl -0-.1 F:EHL E'=;THTE CF: t �L ' i°1 t TH _ , _ H i. ST7
AlliiE1��C't MPTIAii VECE
POST OFFICB BOX 999
DORHAM, CA 95938
(918) 345-1585
TO; sardr110=d .�
DATE: 5-9-96
,SOB SITE;. 1.4.13 spruce Ave.
TAG #
septic system evaluation
We understand that there are two lots being evaluntod.
The first lot has the pool, residence and shop on it. The second
lot has the small house on it,
First lot
We were able to locat two septic tahka. This first tank is located
in the garden area near the raar door of the residence. The tank
is made of concrete with a solid concrete lid. The lid has been broke,
to gain access into the tank for pumping. The baffle,inside the tank
is Vi" thick. it is usually 4" thick. AS l Said above, the lid is
C.,i-At° pd, T? rt!:srs on r.ms hArhe roi, Auks ort.. Thi;q in not a saft
situation. if the tank stays in use, I suggest that the lid be
removed and replaced with 2x12 redwood and then made unopenable by
11ttle children. (Various ways depending on desire.)
The inlet and qutlet pips►$ are in place and leach line level appears
to be at working leve,.
The bathrooms aAd kitchen in the front ;e4jvgoge drains into this
tank. The utility sink in the shop and the washing machines in the
shop drain into thie'tank. The plumbing to the closest string of
shampoo bowls was disconnected. I was unable to verify that they drain:
into this tank. There is a clean-out off the end of the tank which
appears to be for the leach line.
The baffle wall does not extend all the way to the bottom of the tank
as is normal in today's tank design. However$ the wall is not broken.
This is the way it was designed. When the tank reaches operating
level, the solids would be kept seperate which is the function of
the baffle. The tank should be located 5' from any building and not
be under any roofing at -.all. This tank does of meet code because
it is only inchea fromthe building.
SEPTIC TANKS Pt1MPED • MINOR REPAIR.; 9 BACKHOE 9 ENZYMES AVAILABLE
05/1,"96 C19: -27 _CQ:.� REAL ESTATE CR B I LL =M I TH 5
14WR V1 An W
DOMENIV.S. SEPTIC
POST OFFICE SOX 999
DURHAM, CA 95938
(916) 345-1585
F_
TO: 9AUdy RGYA - DATE- 5-9-96
JCB SITE;-..- 1913 Spruce Ave.
TAG #
septic system evaluation (page 2)
Second tank. The second tank is located be the employee lounge.
It is a once chamber, round concrete tank. There is a riser built
over a portion cif bile Lank whiuli is act;euu1v1.►les. Total tank capacity
is approx. 300 -gallons. There are two inlets into the tank. The sink
from the hallway, the bathroom and the shamgoa bowls closest to this
area draina into this tank. They all enter through the game inlet.
Thi* inlet pipe needs to have a sanitary too on it. The second inlet
has the sanitary tee on it, but I can find nothing that 4rains into the
tank through this pipe. when the drain in the house was used, it did
not come into the tank.
There is a second riser nearby. This riser is over leach rock. I canna-
tell if it is a leach line or a leach pit. There two pipes visible.
I believe that one pipe comes.from the round tank. I coo not know
where the second pipe comes from.
There is a white pipe about 10' away near the fence. This pipe has
water visible at the bottom of it. I do not know what.this pipe
is for.
Second lot .
When the toilet for the house WaS flushed, it did not enter any Of the
tanks or pipes that were visible. i can see that the pipes -go down
into the ground under the house. I cannot see whore it if they exit
from under the house. if the house is torn down, do not allow the
pipes to be damaged. The pipes then can be followed to the tank.
If the tank for the house must be located before the house is torn down,
we can snake the line and try to follow the sound. As a last resort,
we can cut a hole in the floor and find which way the pipes are going.
If the tank must be located, let me know.
Questions not answered,
1. Location of tank for little house.
2. what 2nd tee in round tank is for.
3. What second pipe in drain rock is for.
4. What :pipe (vent) is for.
5. Location and length of either leach line.
i
TO, sand Boyd
L IR.,jEi 1 REAL E -STATE CIF: ^ 1 LL '31°1 1 TH . 5-33-77-z:'5 h1S
0
EOMENIVS SE -DTIC SERVICE
POST OFFICE BOX 999
DURHAM, CA 95938
(916) 345-1585
septic system evaluation (page 3)
DATE: 5-9.96
JOB SITE: 1413 flpruvw AVO
TAG #
Enclosed you will find a ma.p showing the tanks located. This map
is not to scala and should be used only for locating the general
location of the various septic system cdmponent:s,
if you have any questrions# please call. z will he glad to talk
with you or meet you on site, i talked with Loris at the county
because she asked me exact questions and I was aware that there
is a pending permit for a day care center of some sort. I'm sure
Lori will continue and do her own evaluation. Bet, if needed, I can
meet her on site also.
Anita Domenichini.
Calif. Colltr? vWL #631363
i
J� r
SEPTIC TANKS PUMPED • MINOR ASPAIR5 9 BACKHOE 9 ENZYMES AVAILABLE
LI IIA& REAL E'=TATE FDR
BILL =1'1ITH . 57 5
HO. 577 C•_
DomgmC'S SEPTIC SERVICE
,O®
!3
�
an
UNDERGROUND COMPRUMN
cowo nk Urs. Ko. 6313x3
f! Q. ACOS 888
CALCULATED 9Y
-
DATE
41UAHAM. Ml IF{1RMA 959n
c.nt..WL#
oATC
(91A� i�48168�J '
SCALE
i
moo.
I.
.
! ' i r• G w ; Ti. 0 .4.
M
40
ro.,��
1
a v
AAAA c 4
a -
* RECEIVE STOPPED
'4:
BUTTE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
TO: California Department of Forestry
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager
RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Blake Roath, UP 96-18
DATE: April 18,1996 PLANNER: Stephen Haelcney
We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application for
completeness and-, if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days
of its submittal it should be heard at the' estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your
•depar-bnenddivision/agency.regm-ding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested.
Should you not be able to respond in the time franne given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a
call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an, pplication for Use Permit to operate a child care center with a licensed capacity for 60 children on property
zoned R-1 ( Residential I acre parcel ) located on 1913 Spruce Ave., Chico, between 9th and 10th Avenue , identified
as APN 003-353-007 10 . It is within Supervisorial District No. R- I .
THIS ITEM I -IAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
ON August . t 22 , 1996.
YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN. May 3 ,199(_►. IF NO COMMENTS OR
COMMUNICATIONARE RECEI VE, D BY THAT DATE, ITIE WILL ASSUAIE 7 HAT YOU HA KE NONE.
COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary):
r
Planni .'�evartMent
-c
APR 7 Q tnnr.
0Mville, Calbrnia,
By: Date:
k:\fonns\convnent.fim 10-I6-95 BKH
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95.965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785
•
BUTTE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
TO: LAFCo
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager
RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Blake Roath, UP 96-18
DATE: April 18,1996 PLANNER: Stephen Hackney
We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application for
completeness and, if complete, for conditions of approval. -If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days
of its submittal it should be heard ° at the estimated -hearing date indicated below. Comments from your
department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested.
Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a
call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an application for Use Permit to operate a child care center with a licensed capacity for 60 children on property
zoned R -I ( Residential 1 acre parcel ) located on 1913 Spruce Ave. Chico, between 9th and 10th Avenue , identified
as APN 003-353-007 10 . It is within Supervisorial District No. R-1 .
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
ON August t 22 , 1996.
YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN May 3 ,1996. IFNO COMMENTS OR
COMMUNICATIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YO UHAVE NONE.
COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary):
M
k:\forms\comment.frm 10-16-95 BKH
Planning Mpar mnnt
APR 2 2 1996
Oroyill, "ii1V/1114
Date: 4tl9&,v
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785
ti
BUTTE COUNTY �.
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES N
PLANNING DIVISION C�� F
NN GGA L��
TO: Butte County Sheriff .rte .o pry
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager p w
RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Blake Roath,
DATE: April 18, t996 PLANNER: Stephen Hackney 8L L4
We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application for
completeness and, if complete; for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days
of its submittal it -should- be heard at the, -estimated : hearing date indicated below. Comments from your
department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested.
Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a
call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an application for Use Permit to operate a child care center with a licensed capacity for 60 children on property
zoned R-1 ( Residential 1 acre parcel ) located on 1913 Spruce Ave. Chico between 9th and 10th Avenue , identified
as APN 003-353-007 10 . It is within Supervisorial District No. R-1 .
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
ON August t 22 , 1996.
YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN May 3 ,1996. IFNO COMMENTS OR
COMMUNICATIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YO UHAVE NONE.
CO NTS (Attach add' i flaI Rae if necessary):
anning NPartment
A n n it w
inue
k:\forms\comment.frm 10-16-95 BKH
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785
0
BUTTE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
TO: AG Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager
RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Blake Roath, UP 96-18
DATE: April 18,1996 PLANNER: Stephen Hackney
We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application for
completeness and, if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days
of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your
department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested.
Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a
call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
This is an application for Use Permit to operate a child care center with a licensed capacity for 60 children on property
zoned R-1 ( Residential 1 acre parcel ) located on 1913 Spnice Ave. Chico between 9th and 10th Avenue , identified
as APN 003-353-007 10 . It is within Supervisorial District No. R-1 .
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one)
X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
ON August t 22 , 1996.
YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN May 3 ,1996. IFNO COMMENTS OR
COMMUNICATIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YOUHAVE NONE.
COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary):
wo ��N►�ryt-P-✓l� j- 1 3 U �Co
Planning' Division
96
rOville, Caiitornia
By: `�� "`"`� (1/1�11f� �v- Date:
k:\forms\comment.frm 10-16-95 BKH
7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 FAX 916-538-7785
0
4
i
cr `a
l
cc2z
_ 0
A Q
•
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT 15344
ISSUED BY
_ '1 I
op
In'
qvxrl,* LIP
DATE
RECEIPT
TOTAL
PUBLIC
LAFCO
USH
VARIANCES
PUBLIC
A•ZONING
ENV
OTHER
APPLICANT
RECEIVED FROM
NO.
RECEIVED
WORKS
PERMITS
DOCUMENTS
HEALTH
'
•
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT 15344
ISSUED BY
_ '1 I
274
q O O
50
141
125
75
a � 0
zoo ------
0
ON
O
cQ
351'
50
ft/ 2,
54
..P/U 42-45
153
65
2
IC 4
.43 Ac.
.18 Ai-
RS110-88
I
CHIUU veuvvo /W.O. R sk. -4 Py. 16
MURPHY TRACT M.O. R. BK. 6 Pg. 29
cc -
%U
so
. I
T. 22N.
V'
/00 /00
q O O
50
ffg
125
75
a � 0
zoo ------
q
/00 /00
so
C
3.1
AVE.
50
50
ffg
O
50
AVE.
ku
Z,
THESE PARCELS ARE FOR AssEssmENr PuRposEs
ONLr.AND MAY mor CONSrtrUrE LEGAL PARCELS.
Assessors Map No. 03-35
County of Butte, Calif.
REVISED: 93 '(45-02,;
E
-- -- ALLEY
A0, IA E/VT LOT
iW; A .PARTI �tv�� Joe
� y�v
septic . 6�1
v
Qt°�v
W
GAR A&F
Propose to remove existing garages and
back house with appurtances for
play yard for daycare.
23 6 ,+ x 2. 1 2057 sq. ft.._
2nd Floor !
N Residence for owners of
Daycare. i existin, }
4
� G
0
Parking - propose to use
RAfWAG for handicapped
077REE
LA6LfM"A 1,E
�nogrN
I//D1VT.y A4 P
AC ,SALE
L
— .� �. /► / IST'
/.� —,
HJT ACC SLOW
---- -------------------
.�'� --2�`2J ------------
WALE
ACRrH
,9TE PLAN.
.c r, _ - '
5f39UOF A VE'
1.9 73430 sq. it.kv
' BEAUTY SH01:7
JG
existing
PAT,�I
�
Propose to use for daycare
facility plus add bathrooms
septic
for children's use.
3'11"
i
23 6 ,+ x 2. 1 2057 sq. ft.._
2nd Floor !
N Residence for owners of
Daycare. i existin, }
4
� G
0
Parking - propose to use
RAfWAG for handicapped
077REE
LA6LfM"A 1,E
�nogrN
I//D1VT.y A4 P
AC ,SALE
L
— .� �. /► / IST'
/.� —,
HJT ACC SLOW
---- -------------------
.�'� --2�`2J ------------
WALE
ACRrH
,9TE PLAN.
.c r, _ - '
5f39UOF A VE'
AZ7,640FIVT LOT
//I ; A PARTI o� : �o LA6EAMMA OF
septic 60 `'
Qt0��5 s �l
I
I
L -RAGE
.Propose to remove existing garages and /1C7H
back house with appurtances for
play yard for daycare. WC✓1VTYA1MP
AC SCALE
19'7 3430 sq. ft.
U W
r� BEWITY Sf;Dcl o r RST LSF 5GASL.A6EiBV
� N
PATk7 W existing i AZ1 ZAEL&F 5' CAD CAALF
Propose to use for daycare +► f�EAYYL.4lIL�"-11F�LG'/SE�0.�7111G'
septic facility plus add bathrooms AZ/;rACrS-,pW
for children's use.
311" gill << �
PfEPAFRD BY
73 ? 619 x 25 2057 sq. ft.
2nd FloorLlbw I&
!
N Residence for owners ofCIS
Daycare. �existin j — t`- ------'-----
I
WALK
I
POOL IZR77-1 ,
i
Parking - propose to use ,S'TE /CLAN
P���
for handicapped , )"* -= = -Ag"'
07AEF
427
-- -- ALLEY
AO,14L-r�LOT
ACTT A PARTI ��yv` ao
\ �4
\ septic
i NO
�to4os
� I
PA W
\
septic
Propose to remove existing garages and
back house with appurtances for
play yard for daycare.
3430 sq. It.
BEAUTY SfU: 7
existing
Propose to use for daycare
facility plus add bathrooms
for children's use.
2')'6"x25 i 2057 sq. ft.
2nd Floor
0101,10 rlE,SaDE/It.�
N Residence for owners of
Davcare. (existing)
4
LA6U9V-" A tom'
'4nv97H
WC11VTY Ate'
AC SCALE
Ir FE9VT LAF G AS LA614 E:7
r
4499,CS DYLD CAS'
x ffAI/YL.MIG/SEXlS'7111G
HJT /IDT .57 -OW
RIEPAfSED BY
�----------
WALK
Pte. I
i
Parking - propose to use
FADWA G for handicapped
077E
/10977-1
.�
-- -- ALLEY
AZIMCENT LOT
iWT A RARTI q'��`. Jo
septic Z66W
i - ko
� 4to4oy�
PA 7V
septic
3'll" 8'Il"
W
Propose to remove existing garages and
back house with appurtances for
play yard for daycare.
3430 sq. ft.
BEAUTY S/7CF
existing
Propose to use for daycare
facility plus add bathrooms
:for children's use.
23'6"x25 ).. 2057 sq. tt.
2nd Floor '
010" r�E�OE/LC�
N !Residence for otivners Of
Daycare. (existing}
_ i 4
2 11
211 G
i
Parking - propose to use
1pADW for handicapped
07AEF
IWAU
A PE�
�MMY
1//01VTY MAP
/% SALE
`� ` /► / —
/��
mr,'A.
a/T /IDT .9WPW
---- -----------------
WA[X
ACR;rH
00
Sf3cZAI AVE.
-- -- ALLEY
AO.UACENT LOT
etc.
1AC7T A PART)
septic ��66
Ft�4oy
PA W
Propose to remove existing garages and
back house with appurtances for
piav yard for daycare.
I
3430 sq. �t._,�►.
BEAUTY Shy
existing
Propose to use for daycare
septic facility plus add bathrooms
for children's use.
3'll" S'll"
23 '6 " x 25 J 2057 sq. ft.
2nd Floor
fig,'
/-�E.57OE/tC�
N Residence for owners of
CIS Daycare. (existin }
.o
Parking - propose to use
1
PADW for handicappedAG
i
OTS
IWIU
I",l•T
PGS I
—
i
LA6E#9VJW A PE
WC/t®TYA&4,CI
AC SCALE'
• i.� -� ori' �
P/9L:PAFWZ7 BY
1 � i
5/39UOF AVE' ,
-- -- ALLEY
A ZIACE/VT LOT
iW; A PARTI " I J0
o
septic
� 4�t
t �v`
�LJQ37
� I
w
'Il
PA W
septic
3111„ 8111"
Propose to remove existing garages and
back house with appurtances for
play yard for daycare.
3430 sq. ft.
BEAUTY 51 -AL -P
eXistlne
Propose to use for daycare
facility plus add bathrooms
for children's use.
23'6"x2-5 ; - 2057 sq. ft. .
?nd Floor '
f-7E57DE/1 L�
�
'Residence for owners of
0?Daycare. 'existin 7}
I11-� i
LA63'J91[" A kE
!//DIVTY 11444'
AC SCALE
Ix Fl ME?VT LASE �G AS L.AAELEE7
r �► AZ/%LFE L 49F, ' ZYAL G C*W
r AEA VY W
M17 ACC 910AW
RIEP,qDIRcD BY
---- ------------------
—---------.
WALK
i
i
Parking - propose to use
Pte/ for handicapped
low
OTFE
AER7h1
-- -- ALLEY
AZZIA ENT LOT
1ACT A PARTI
septic i �t
v3
.gip i
1 X04
I 7�
Qto4°
11-1
PA ZV
septic
311" 811"
Propose to remove existing garages and
back Douse with appurtances for
play yard for daycare.
3430 sq. ft.
BEAUTY 5f7011:7
existing
Propose to use for daycare
facility plus add bathrooms
for children's use.
231611x25 2-057 sq. ft.
2nd Floor
.,. f 1E5�DE/IL
TJ ,
N
Residence for owners of
Daycare. (existing)
i
PGS.
Parking - propose to use
PAjWAG for Handicapped
OTS
�r
M
L,.191L" A 1,E
�nIWrN
1//OIVTYTAP
AC .S ALE
a/T 1%Cr .9�C;W
P�PAF�D BY
.21
/J11._--LL�.L��-------
ncWTH
SF79UGZ� A VE,
-- -- ALLEY
AZZM E/VT LOT
ACT A PARTI o���o � A vs
septic YN_166 '
S
�V _999M 'A ME
GARAGE
ALW
Propose to remove existing garages and �7H'
back house with appurtances for
play yard for daycare. WCIVTY /144
_ AC SCALE
1.91711 3430 sq. ft.
w
BEAUTY SN'04,
r i!l '� LZSCSASL.46EZ 7
� N
'-' existing r X R/%ZAF L49 -=,G OYL0 C44LC
PA W
Propose to use for daycare X AFAVYL /.SEXT67AIG
septic -facility plus add bathrooms EtJ7AVr.9W;W
for children's use.
Pf�PAREO BY
23'6"x25 i 2057 sq. ft.. _
2nd ;~loos '
-- -------------------
Residence for owners ofL �j
Daycare. (existing }
S.lrx t ( �..�11_--�i�l1�— — — — — — — — — --
4
C 7Z WALK
PGDL 110?77-1
Parking - propose to use ,9TE PLAN
PA��%/�. for handicapped SCC r, = �_O.,
i
0773EF �' as 4 16M .25 X77
-- -- ALLEY
A9,1ACENT LOT
iWT A PARTI ���`:. �o , LA6sr I" A P
septic _
1 �tV�3�y 1
Q
�c4 7
Qto4J��. r�
S FAV
J
G*1 GARAGE ��
v Propose to remove existing garages and
PZ:
back house With appurtances for
play yard for daycare. 1//01VTY MAP
AC SCALE
3130 sq. ft.
fli-
RA
1 ).rS
+� f�VT LZFG AS LA6EZkV
.- 77V existing 1► Jr /Qr%ZAE 6.9FG O'Z.0 CAALF�
Propose to use for daycare r hEA1�YL /SEXI.STIIIG'
septic facility plus add bathrooms ZX17 ACrSr- kW
for children's use.
Mitt
199KFA EV BY
23.'.6 " x 25 205? sq. ft.
2nd Floor
Bum d&
N Resl&nct, for owners of02
Daycare. (existing} t'- -----'---'-'--
<, .
211
1
Ran AO?7H '
Parking -propose to use SYTE PY.AAI
I
P��/
for handicapped .0 %• -r�_�..
1
07ASF ` as .25 X77
-- -- ALLEY
AD.1A=-A1T LOT
ACT A PART "v`0� . ao
septic Q
c�� I
IN
PA W
septic
311" 8'11"
Propose to remove existing garages and
back house with appurtances for
play yard for daycare.
3430 sq. ft.
BEAUTY 5/70'
existing
Propose to use for daycare
facility plus add bathrooms
for children's use.
2" 5 x 25
2/05 -'sq. ft.._
2nd Floor
t7 LORSOEM2F
N Residence for owners of
x
Daycare. (existin }
i 4
.o .
PGCE
i
Parking - propose to use
FADWA for handicapped
07AEEr
A1 -E
�nv9rN
1//DIVTY MSF'
AC7.S ALE
r 9VT L iRF G AS LAaM87
r 1► � L dRF G DLZ. C
r A A VYL.4/1 /5' E�5'TIIIG
all ACr-9LCW
Pf,�PAF,�EO BY
---- ------------------
.2t- .ZO-----------
WALK
nog77-1
Sy99L/LF AI/E.
-- -- ALLEY
AC%JAL-E/VT LOT
4�t
iW; A PART
septic ��,6\
� Ut
J:W
PA W
septic
311"
Propose to remove existing garages and
back rouse with appurtances for
play yard for daycare.'
3430 sq. ft.
1 BEAUTY SI -10'
N
existing
Propose to use for daycare
facility plus add bathrooms
-for children's use.
73 '6 " x 25 ; . 2_057.sq. ft.
2nd Floor !
0,. r,�ESiDE/IL'�
iv Residence for ON-Nmers of
0? Daycare. (existing"
4
' 2 G
Parking propose to use
f ADi AG for handicapped
OTS
A I -E
WC✓1VTY I4P
AC SCALE
Ir )9WSSVT 6SF SCS' AS L4ESK=
% * AZ17ZAE LASF G 0A,0 CWW
X A A VY L4/IC7_qr_4FAG IS jSVS7AG
6Z/T ACC .9LOPW
RIEPARSO BY
& Z_z �__
WALK
ACR77�
-- -- ALLEY
A 9,1A E/VT LOT
ACT A PART)
septic 6�\0
� Lo4
�to4J .
' I
I
. -1
4
N(
J
Propose to remove existing garages and-
back
ndback house with appurtances for
play yard for daycare.
3430 sq. ft.
PA W
septic
3111" 81111,
existing
.Propose to use for daycare
facility plus add bathrooms
for children's use.
23 , 6 1
1 X25
i 2057 sq. ft.
2nd Floor '
hol.,, r�ES%DE/�C
N Residence for owners of
Os Daycare. (existing)
Parking - propose to use
for handicapped
ori
i
�ACH7H
I/CIVTY AIMP
AC . 4LE
/.�mr,1A
alrACr.9LC;W
PfEPAfRFO SY
.d'UL7.�L__ 2��21D---------
WAUr
/ACRrH
,�'TE PLAN
sz. r'
42,04AM& 4907
S A VE.
-- -- ALLEY
AIZZIAGENT LOT
1ACT A RARTI ;��� �o A PE
septic
� Q�tv � Q
10 Q.
-------------
J A kS
GARAGE
Propose to remove existing garages and
�/►O�TN
back house with appurtances for
play yard for daycare.' 1/CIVTYAIM P
19'7 3430 sq. it.
'� �BEAUTY Sf�
fir LR/S AS L46ELE7
� N
existing r � /V� URC '
PA 7V�
Propose to use for daycare X AFAVYL /SE,1�,ST711G
septic facility plus add bathrooms AL1q►/
TAprSIVP
for children's use.
3'11" s'll" PREPAFEO BY
23,6„x25 2057 sq. ft.
2nd Floor !
SOEAGE
CIS Residence for owners of 1
�1...(y �
Daycare. (existm) L
�-----------
MZ WALK
PGOL nc�rt�
i
Parking - propose to use 5YTE f'Y.AN
PAf��IAG for handicapped i ,C %" = AT—Ag"',
OTA' ` act 37
~- -- -- Sf35ZULE A VE
-- -- ALLEY
AO,14GENT LOT
ACT A RARTl
septic 3,66
1 �l�
'Vo
PA W
W
:Propose to remove existing garages and
back house with appurtances for
play yard for daycare.
3430 sq. ft.
BEAUTY 5/701=1
existing
Propose to use for daycare
septic facility plus add bathrooms
for children`s use.
3'll" 8'11"
2''6"x2S 2051 sq. ft.
2nd Floor
10014 Residence for owners oOCf
Daycare_ (existin }
L.46t#c?V"A 1 S
�ACR7H
WC11VTY AIMP
1%C SC4LE
-- C
X hF�41/I' /S EXI,STIIIG'
AVrACrSK7CA N
RITPARSO BY
---- -------------------
l WALK
POGO. I
1
1
Paring -propose to use
i
PAX?<7AG for handicapped ,
OTfEZF
/IL7�Tf1
Sf79L/LF A l�
-- -- ALLEY
ACUAGENT LOT
iW; A PARTI ��'� JoA PE
V
septic
P!
J AW
GARAGE AUMH
N Propose to remove existing garages and
back house with appurtances for
play _yard for daycare. WCII ®'TY AIMP
_ AC SCALE
19' 7" 3130 sq. ft.
do 4
' 3 BEAUTY 5�,'
N
r SEAT L4'�G AS LA6EZB7
4-'
PA Wexisting r r► R/MAF LSF CG LMLO CWW
�
Propose to use for daycare /SEAVYLA�I /✓ EX/5'77nG
septic f�
acility plus add bathrooms /T/1OT,910;►/
for Children's use.
PFEPAAEO BY
2')'6"x25 2057 sq. ft.
2nd Floor
— -- -----=------------
–30,01, ti L.504FICY
Residence for o%vneTs of
Daycare. existin j
�1 7 IL/j___ 2t�EJL _
i
' o
i
Parking -propose to use ,SYTE PLAN
PA�� -,
for handicapped ' Sr r" = Ao_O"',
077'
r - - SR RJZY A Y Lam•
-- -- ALLEY
AZ21AC 1VT L OT
septic X66\
y�
Qto4J
PA 7,V
septic
13'11" 811"
Propose to remove existing garages and
back house with appurtances for
play yard for daycare.
3430 sq. ft.
BEAUTY 5ff70'
existing
Propose to use for daycare
facility plus add bathrooms
for children's use.
?�-'6"x?, 2057 sq. ft.
2nd :Floor !
r�ES)DE/tC'
iv CIS 2es'denc:-for owners of
Daycare. (existing)
- 4
� G
� PSL I
Parking - propose to use
PUA for handicapped
OTS
M
AIE
�MMY
WC11VTY A44f'
AC Sr.ALE
a/rnor.':;LCP v
--- ------------------
n 8777,
.. i�iC v"C iii
5/397UCMF A l/E.
4227 0
-- -- ALLEY
AC.U64CENT LOT
z
' iW; A PAfRTI
septic
� X04
c� I
PA 7V
septic
�'lt" 8'll t,
Propose to remove existizig garages and
back house with appurtances for
play yard for daycare.'
3430 sq. -it.
BEAUTY SMF
existMe
Propose to use for daycare
facility plus add bathrooms
for children's use.
23 o x 25 i %057 sq. ft.
2nd Floor !
x Residence for owners of
Daycare_ (existing.)
PGS
i
Parking - propose to use
PAW for handicapped
0 %f>EE7
LA6E#c?V M A 12
WC11®'TY ti'AP
AC SC' ,F
I�► FKE2@9VI LSF G AS LA6?ff-a7
n �► /cUMfes LcSic',CS LOAN CAS
r hFAVYL /SEXISrAG
a17'/IC7'-910AW
PfLPAFWD BY
BW da
1 WALK
00/
5/99LAEF A!/E.
-- -- ALLEY
AIZI MGE/VT L OT
ACT A PART
septic
L I
�NQ
I 4�
QtO�v.,
� I
PA W
W
J
caaacE �
Propose to remove existing garages and-
back
ndback house with appurtances for
play yard for daycare.
I
I
3430 sq. ft._Q►•
BEAUTY 51,E
existing
Propose to use for daycare
septic facility plus add bathrooms
for children's use.
Yl1" 8'11"
23 r b ,j X 25 J O5% sq. ft.
2nd Floor
I
N Residence for oxmers of
N Daycare. (existing)
- I
I
7
ff�
1
1
Parking - propose to use
for handicapped
I
WALK
L A1 -E
I//01VTY MAP
AC SCALE
Pf�P,4F�E0 BY
---------
AO?7H
SF39L/LF Alm
..
-- -- ALLEY
AOUALTNT LOT
ACTT A PARTI ��Ly,,: Jo'
septic �a
�Vo
� Qto4°5
PA 7V
septic
Propose to remove existing garages and
back house with appurtances for
play yard for daycare.'
3430 sq. f -.
BEAUTY 5/70IC2
existing
Propose to use for daycare
facility plus add bathrooms
for children's use.
2,,6„x25 I
OS , sq. ft.
2nd Floor
rE.SiDE/IC
N :Residence for oN ners of
00
Daycare. (existin ?}
i 4
I .o
!//alVTY MAP
AC .S ALE
Ir RZSWr L& -=,G AS LA6EZB7
r +� /v%ZAF L& -= ,G OLIED r -41W
r AFA VY LA/1� /S EXl5'77IIG
a/T ACr Snt7PW
---- ------------------
WALK
FLU I
M
i
Parking - propose to use
Pte/ for handicapped
ow
0 %fes
A0 ?77h1
F�
H/ WL A!/E
-- -- ALLEY
AO.14CE/VT LOT '
.�i
ACT PARTI
septic �3
vco
j
GARAGE �Q
Propose to remove existing garages and
-back house :with appuna- noes for
play yard for daycare.
\- /ALW7H
k74C11 TY MAP
AC .Ra -' E
POGO �
i
Parking - propose to use
for handicapped ,
OTfEEE
W__
— -- ------------------
A0977-1
SITZADF A VF.
^ l9' 7" 3430 sq. ft.
BEAUTY SND'
�
i N
existing
PA W V
Propose to use for daycare
facility plus add bathrooms
septic
for children's use.
3'll" 8'll"
23'6"x25. 2057 sq. ft.
2nd Floor '
r� MZ7E�1,C Y
�.
N Residence for oxvners of
Daycare. (existing)
' o
\- /ALW7H
k74C11 TY MAP
AC .Ra -' E
POGO �
i
Parking - propose to use
for handicapped ,
OTfEEE
W__
— -- ------------------
A0977-1
SITZADF A VF.
-- -- ALLEY
AGUACENT LOT
IACT A PARTS o��ay Jo
septic Wo
�ta4J
� I
r
PA W
septic
311" S'll"
Propose to remove existing garages and
back house With appurtances for
play yard for daycare.'
3430 sq. ft.
BEAUTY S/70'
existinV
Propose to use for daycare
facility plus add bathrooms
for children's use.
23 t a 1
1 x 25 2-057 sq. ft.
2nd Floor '
f t MDE F y
N Residence for oxwiers of
OS Daycare. (existin .}
4
A I -E
.r Aw,
; `4 (t
�MR7H
MC11VTY USP
AC .5 ALE
IX SVT LAGF SG A.S LAaS EV
n
17/7Z.F L 49F,G OLE -,C CA�W
0
r f�AYYL.4/IL�S.�".Af�1G /S E,lU57A1�
6l7'ACC SIS CWV
Pf9EPARFO BY
WAL. <
PQM
i
Parking - propose to use
FADAWAG for handicapped i
07AEF
A097H'
JO
AIF
Sf396LZF A liE.
-- -- ALLEY
ACLIA E/VT LOT
ACTT A PART ",� jot
o
septic �
etU4
PA W
septic
sill ft
W
' J
G.4RAGE
Propose to remove existing garages and
back house With appurtances for
play yard for daycare.
3430 sq. ft.
BEAUTY 5/7011:1
existing
Propose to use for daycare
facility plus add bathrooms
.for children's use.
23 ' 6 " x 25 i 2057 sq. ft. .
2nd Floor '
�E57DE/I.CE
fool' , w
N Residence for owners of
02
Daycare. ;existin )
' o
4
PGS
Parking - propose to use
PADWAG for handicapped
ori
r - - - -
IWAU
A WE
WOA ITY A44P
AC SrE
Ix R iE3VV7-L6L= ,G AS LA�RffBJ
n x fZ/%ZAE L.9 G OVU7 CAW
x AEA VYL.MLiQ".AF�1G /S E.1�5'Til1G
LW ACr .SWPW
R/9SPARSO BY
F1,06 BUM jb�
!WALK
AO?rH
S9TE PLAN
S A 1/E.