Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
UP 97-16
V110qq !� PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE #: "UP 97-16 PROJECT TYPE: Use Permit APPLICANT: William R. Bisbee ADDRESS: 6850 Melvina Ave., Palermo, CA 95968 OWNER: Same ADDRESS: REPRESENTATIVE: ADDRESS: lk PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for a kennel for 10 dogs PROPERTY ZONED: ARMH-1 LOCATED: at 6850 Melvina Ave, approx. 1,700 ft. north of Messina Ave. AP#: 026-050-026 TOWN/AREA: Palermo GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Agricultural -Residential 1. Application complete: December 9,1996 Amount: $ 688.00 Receipt #: 15695 2. Comments sent to: Environmental Health, LAFCo, Develop. Service, Public Works, Building, Ag Comm., CDF 3. Comments received from: 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 6. Assigned To: Steve Hackney 7. Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No: Categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Subject to Fish & Game: Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. -CEQA # 15061.(bx3) Other 8. Staff Report: Project Video: Release to publish: _ 9. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: _ 10. Publication Notice Written: Display Ad Prepared: 11. Notices Mailed: 12. 13. umber of Notices: -�A —z v — - — Newspaper Publication Date: / OX P G B R Planning Commission Hearing(s): (n�� 10— ��. % �(� t4 Action taken: 18. Assessor's Memo: 19. Copy of Use Permit / Variance to Planning Technician: Ordinance No: Adopted: Fish & Game Fees Paid: Yes No Special Conditions: Commission Resolution No. 14. Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): _ Action taken: Board Resolution No.: 15. Type Use Permit/Send for signature: 16. N.O.E. / N.O.D. / APPENDIX G: 17. Send validated Use Permit: 18. Assessor's Memo: 19. Copy of Use Permit / Variance to Planning Technician: Ordinance No: Adopted: Fish & Game Fees Paid: Yes No William Bisbee - proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding environmental -impacts and lJse permit for a dog kennel, to allow -a 320 -square foot, structureconsisting of 10 stalls, 11 dogs and 12 runs on a six (6) acre parcel on property zoned AR -MH -1 (Agricultural Residential - Mobile Home - 1 acre parcels) located at 6850 Melvina Avenue, approximately 1,700 feet north of Messina Avenue, identified as AP 026-050-026, Palermo. (SH) (File UP97-16) A video of the site was shown. Mr. Hackney gave a brief summary of the project. He said staff recommends denial. He said there have been many complaints from the neighbors. Mr. Hackney noted a correction in the findings, changing Section 2 A(3) from 100 new parcels to 12 new parcels. Chairman Lambert noted that a letter in opposition was received from Horace and Natalie Grimm. A petition from Loretta Hinkle, with photos, in opposition, was also received. The hearing was opened to the public. Larry Bannon said he was adamantly against this kennel because of the noise. .William Bisbee said the Commission is welcome to visit the site. He said when a person -- - has.land they_ should_ be, able to -have .animals. .He said _other_-neighbors.have.dogs.that, bark and make his dogs bark. He said he would follow the conditions and the law. Commissioner Leland said he understood Mr. Bisbee's feeling, but the C_ ommission has to judge this project on meeting the criteria of the.Butte County Code and law. Clayton Mitchell said he was opposed to the permit because of noise. He said Mr. Bisbee's dogs bark all night and keep him up. He said the kennel would de -value property in the area. Alice Barnes said she was the previous owner of this property for 17 years and she never had any problems with her neighbors. She said Mr. Bisbee is using a private road for access that he does not have a right to use. She was opposed to the kennel. Robert Johnson said he was against the project because of noise. He also felt the kennel would de -value his property. Loretta Hinkle said she has lived here for 27 years. She said the dogs bark all day and night. She said she has a tape recording of Mr. Bisbee's dogs barking. She was against —the -kennel. - - - - - Linda Bickford said she was opposed to the kennel. ' BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - July 26, 1997 I� Walt Hagard suggested that approval of this permit would give the County jurisdiction and control over the,dogs. Mr. Bisbee said he has the dogs for his livelihood. He said, yes, dogs bark. He said some of the people testifying today are not telling the truth. The hearing was closed. Commissioner Leland said he visited the site. He said there was a slight odor from the Emus, but it was not bad. It was. moved by Commissioner Mooney, seconded by Commissioner Leland, and unanimously carried to deny the Use Permit as follows: EXHIBIT "A" Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. - An Initial Study has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. B: Potentially significant environmental impacts•�may result from approval -of -this, application. C. The Initial Study has been. independently .reviewe-d,_analyzed and._consider_ed..and_ reflects the independent judgement of the County of Butte.- , Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed use of the property, pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-100, may conflict with, impair or be detrimental to the uses both permitted and conditional in the ARMH-1 zone and the Agricultural Residential General Plan designation in which it is located and/or adjoins: 1. Existing development pattern has numerous residential structures within 300 feet of the proposed use; and 2. The ARMH-1 zone will allow for the creation of more than 12 new parcels . immediately adjacent to the project site; and -3: The -keeping -of animals, including dogs,• has , resulted. in.several complaints regarding noise and sanitation on this property. Increasing the number of dogs will increase the land use incompatibility with adjacent parcels. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - July 26, 1997 B. The proposed use will be incompatible with, or injurious to, surrounding properties in_.that. .the ,.project .site_.has,.not. existed, -compatibly with.. adjacent,. properties. for several years and it is not reasonable to expect that approval.of this application, even conditioned to address the identified potential impacts, will reduce such impacts to a level of insignificance; and C. The proposed use of the property will be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood, or to the general health, welfare and safety. of the residents of the County in that the proposed use will exacerbate existing conditions associated with identified impacts. Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings in Sections 1 and 2 of this Exhibit.the request for a Use Permit is denied for William Bisbee on APN 026-050-026 to allow a dog kennel for eleven (11.) dogs on property zoned ARMH-1 located at 6850 Melvina Avenue, approximately 1700 feet north of Messina Avenue, Palermo area. Mr. Bisbee asked about getting his money back. _ Chairman -Lambert-explained,that When an application`is applied -for there is the risk that the project may be denied. She informed Mr. Bisbee of the appeal process. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - July 26, 1997 AGENDA REPORT • TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commission FROM: Department of Development Services - Planning Division DATE: May 27, 1997 REQUEST: Use Permit #97-16 for William Bisbee on APN 026-050-026: A request for a Use Permit for a dog kennel, to allow a 320 square foot structure consisting of 10 stalls, 11 dogs and 12 runs on a six.(6) acre parcel in Palermo. 'The applicant does not propose a commercial venture and will not have any employees. Currently the site has a single family residence and a barn and an assortment of animal life on the 6 acre site. The project site is zoned ARMH-1 (Agricultural Residential Mobile Home - 1 acre minimum) and has a general plan designation of Agricultural Residential. RELATED ITEMS: None .FOR: Planning Commission Meeting of June 26, 1997 SUMMARY: This application is for a Use Permit to allow a dog kennel, to include a 320 square foot structure consisting of 10 stalls, 11 dogs and 12 runs on a six (6) acre parcel in Palermo. Staff recommends the Planning Commission deny this request due to the findings contained in this report. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS: This request is for a Use Permit to allow a dog kennel, to include a 320 square foot structure consisting of 10 stalls, 11 dogs and 12 runs on a six (6) acre parcel in Palermo. The applicant does not propose a commercial venture and will not have any employees. Currently the site has a single family residence and a barn and an assortment of animal life on the 6 acre site. The project site is zoned ARMH-1 (Agricultural Residential Mobile Home - 1 acre minimum) and has a general plan designation of Agricultural Residential. The project site is surrounded by parcels ranging in size from 1/4 acre to 5+/- acres. All surrounding parcels have ARMH-1 zoning and Agricultural Residential land use designation. The parcel is bordered by residences on all sides. There are several residence's less than 300 feet from where animals are presently being kept. The site is serviced by its own septic system and well water. Access to the parcel is from Melvina Avenue via Messina Avenue, Palermo. ANALYSIS: The request can be considered under the current ARMH-1 zoning and Agricultural Residential land use designation. The dog kennel is listed as a conditionally consistent use in the ARMH-1 zone, and is a secondary use of the Agricultural Residential land use designation. The project site is approximately six (6) acres in size. However, staff ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ❑ 1 has several concerns with this request. These concerns include: sanitation, noise, and land use compatibility with surrounding neighbors. Sanitation. Approval of this project may have a potentially significant impact from runoff to nearby surface waters due to dog feces and other animal wastes.' This is an issue that, with proper mitigations, could be adequately addressed for the kennel use through the design & installation of a concrete pad that drains to an approved septic system. Currently the applicant has a wide assortment of animals on his property: horses, mules, goats, pigs, geese, ducks, peacocks., chickens, and dogs. Staff noticed several areas of scattered animal waste on the property, as well as piled animal waste. This request is intended to apply only to the keeping of dogs in the kennel, other animals are governed by the animal keeping sections of the zoning code and are permitted without a permit or any restriction on the number of animals kept. Noise. Approval of this project may result in a potentially significant impact from noise. The applicant currently has two hound dogs on the property already. This has resulted in several noise complaints to Butte County Animal Control. Butte County Animal Control's comments regarding this application is that approval of this request "most likely will result in additional nuisance complaints .... " Butte County Animal Control points out that the type of dogs the applicant has said he wants to kennel (hound dogs) are known for howling excessively just by their nature. This is an issue that could be addressed through the use of proper mitigations such. as anti -barking collars and/or bark -activated sprinkler systems. However, ongoing monitoring may be difficult and the potential for more complaints may not be significantly reduced. Land Use Compatibility. The Agricultural Residential General Plan designation allows for intense animal uses as a secondary use and makes provisions for quasi -public uses. The proposed dog kennel conforms to this criteria in that it is clearly an intense animal use. While the ARMH-1 (Agricultural Residential Mobile Home -1 acre min.) zone does allow for animal keeping, it was modified in February 1995 to specifically require a use permit to allow kennels based on past interpretations of animal keeping. This request for a dog kennel is not compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. There are residences on all sides of the project site, with some family dwellings less than 200 to 300 feet away. All the surrounding parcels are zoned ARMH- 1. Most of the neighboring parcels are larger than two (2) acres in size. The potential for future land divisions down to one acre parcels is present, resulting in the increasing of the number of residences living next/near the proposed dog kennels. The neighborhood is of a rural residential nature, i.e. larger parcel sizes and animal keeping. The kennel may create significant visual and odor impacts to surrounding properties due to the proximity of several neighbors', residences. The applicant's parcel is not screened from, surrounding residences. The site currently has some odor impacts due to the number of different species of animals already on-site and because of the manner in which the animal waste exists on-site (Site visit). The kennel will create a significant ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ❑ 2 noise impact due to the type and number of dogs. The history of noise events on-site and the history of the relationship of the applicant with his neighbors (as related to staff by William Bisbee indicate the County may expect continued noise nuisance complaints. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: This application has been defined as a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and as such, is subject to the requirements of CEQA. Based upon the review of the Initial Study, staff has determined there are potentially significant impacts resulting from this project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the application for William Bisbee on APN 026-050-026, due to the following findings in the attached .Exhibit "A." Attachments: A: - Project and Surrounding Area, B: Vicinity Map C: Exhibit "A" - Findings k:\planning\projects\upc\bisbee\bisbee.rpt ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ❑ 3 EXHIBIT "A" Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. An Initial Study has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. , B. Potentially significant environmental impacts may result from approval of this application. C. The Initial Study has been independently reviewed, analyzed and considered and reflects the independent judgement of the County of Butte. Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed use of the property, pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24- 100, may conflict with, impair or be detrimental to the uses both permitted and conditional in the ARMH-1 zone and the Agricultural Residential General Plan designation in which it is located and/or adjoins: 1. Existing development pattern has numerous residential structures within 300 feet of the proposed use; and J r? - 2. Z2. The ARMH-1 zone will allow for the creation of more than;Wnew parcels immediately adjacent to the project site; and 3. The keeping of animals, including dogs, has resulted in several complaints regarding noise and sanitation on this property. Increasing the number of dogs will increase the land use incompatibility with adjacent parcels. B. The proposed use will be incompatible with, or injurious to, surrounding properties in that the project site has not existed compatibly with adjacent properties for several years and it is not reasonable to expect that approval of this application, even conditioned to address the identified potential impacts, will reduce such impacts to a level of insignificance; and C. The proposed use of the property will be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the persons residing or working in. the neighborhood, or to the general health, welfare and safety of the residents of the County in that the proposed use will exacerbate existing conditions associated with identified impacts. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services.- Planning Division ❑ 4 F Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings in Sections 1 and 2 of this Exhibit the request for a Use Permit is denied for William Bisbee on APN 026-050-026 to allow a dog kennel for eleven (11) dogs on property zoned ARMH-1 located at 6850 Melvina Avenue, approximately 1700 feet north of Messina Avenue, Palermo area. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ❑ 5 U I Vicinity Map I Location UP 97-16 APN 026-050-026 ERMO J 1 ERROR: invalidrestore OFFENDING COMMAND: restore STACK: I ERROR: invalidrestore . . OFFENDING COMMAND: restore STACK: PROJECT NAME William Bisbee S CH # AP # 026-050-026 FILE # IIP 97-16 30 Day Review Period Ends SCH Review Period Ends OUTGOING.ACTIVITY Date Agency/Person I I - I - I I I - DEPARTMEOT OF DEVELOPME SERVICES BUTTE t,0 �, TY UNIFORM FORM APPLATION AYYLIUAN'F: Agent information fo ne provtueu is on otner slue: APPLICANT'S NAME ( If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required 1 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: , ,' 07-&- DSD -02C� I ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) r 17 MC/ I/, -n1,4 n u," 1bWL JC:'R 6'71 e,4 9 .S -76t 'k )P Q -7 —/ Le INAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) I (� 6TELEPFi0) S3 H — F /� 'I/- /' OWNER'S NAME ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TELEPHONE �f•/3/V �' (9i4) S - ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE a /�7 A: / V E ac 9 s'6 k, ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE ( in Square Feet or Acres ) i G- ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 4UE5 EXIS'T'ING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES ( in'Square Feet )i (Check One) 1 (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC J4 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION Q ..........:. ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ OTHER •°��'- PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division , describe the number and size of parcels.) !c) aa Is s-1,4 �L S f X f — 11 1��'x�S -Corr,!�c/ 17_ MUuS C C),j crq-A c O c S' . e Planning Division Y On U 9 Me VtuviltC, tial . .... .....<:...: OWNER CERTIFICATION 1 CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OFTHE OWNER OF -ME ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER. I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILL`G OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE (If an agent is to be authorved, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with thiZiL:6. X DATE: —9 96 xSIGNATURE:')r _t R ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ REZONE USE PERMIT ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT ❑ VARIANCE ❑ MINOR VARIANCE ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ OTHER •°��'- PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division , describe the number and size of parcels.) !c) aa Is s-1,4 �L S f X f — 11 1��'x�S -Corr,!�c/ 17_ MUuS C C),j crq-A c O c S' . e Planning Division Y On U 9 Me VtuviltC, tial . .... .....<:...: OWNER CERTIFICATION 1 CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OFTHE OWNER OF -ME ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER. I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILL`G OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE (If an agent is to be authorved, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with thiZiL:6. X DATE: —9 96 xSIGNATURE:')r _t R AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; Print Name of Agent and Phone Number Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for on my property, identified as Butte County Assessors Parcel Number . This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document (s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Print Name Print Name Signature Architect and/or Engineer: Print Name of ArcWtect/Engineer and Phone Number Mailing Addrar FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date received:_ ' Signature Total amount received: (a 8 Z • 0 o VAP Number(s) N Fk Legal Description .Owners Authorization v Zoning requirements ✓isroject Description Copies of plot plan Taken bye Receipt No .�(PRS E.Hgs. o c LD c Sa oo Plan �oo•oo Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $:k8�ve, 8F as of i3 9, � 2 Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) KDate Filed\ t � - 1 li � -q General Information: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or project sponsor: 14/,' L k i '/9,&21R 2. Address of project: t S S -Q -A J(9 P A 4 F F /►rjy C k 959LE Assessor's Parcel Number: O 2Z — o SO 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: 9/6 6j; L Li I4 F: c Aif&C-- 4 3! S -,b /rl C• L V 1 •4e4 kk' 82 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. Existing general plan designation: Ate- P -c , 6. Existing zoning district: -% R M.9 - / 7. How is land currently used? J- i 1/ 9 S 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): LAC &.419 L Project Description: i 9. Site size: 04 (Acres/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: "`- Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes No 12. Proposed development schedule 13. Associated proj 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development Planning Division D L L 0 9 1996 C�iuvmv, Calitomia ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 1 • Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _ 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. _ X 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). _ K 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. Manning Division U t L 0 9 1996 uivvme, caiitornia 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 2 s ,Environmenta S tting:-(Attach-b(ef descriptio) Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33 _, Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date---,, n Dal S� C Planning Division K:\FORMS\ENV-INFO DEL 0 y 1996 CruvuiC, Caurornia ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 3 Serving rhe north Swe sbwe 1929 LaDonna Joyner * Chief Executive Officer 0 Main Office 0 droville. 500 Wall Street 1835 Robinson St. P.O. Box 5173 P.O. Box 811 - Chico, CA 95927 Oroville, CA 95960 (916) 894-2612 (916) 533-2414 (916) 533-2553 PAX (916) 533-1589 (916) 846-4583 (916) 846-4583 PAX (916) 894-0713 Paradise 7126A Skyway P.O. Box 490 Paradise, CA 95967 (916) 877-6262 PAX (916) 877-5129 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION DATE TIME, SENT TO YOU BY A L NO. OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: 3 0 Gridley 560 Kentucky St. P.O. Box 949 Gridley, CA 95948 (916) 946-4005 PAX (916) 946-0584 FAX TO PHONE # 621Z-0 ATTENTION ✓ 4 RI G-INA1V---WILL--,,FOLLOW ORIGINAL WILL NOT FOLLOW THIS FAX PERTAINS TO: FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX %. A I 1� GRANT DEED ( ...et Tcnancri I jFor value Mai nad ALMA M. 3'I rH, a widow GRAM ...... _.to MT JONES and ADHA JOM, hteband and utile ' l a Joint Tenants, all dear teal peopetey tftusee is she Itannery of bat t• . Stsee of Cauiornis. dnoa o lolluin: 1 portion of the South half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quer of Section S, Township ld North, hangs 1 Mast, M.D.B. k K., Toro partiom" described as follawt r' 1 OOMMalrtg at the canter of said Section s, and running thence Borth aloin. the center Section line a distance .of 330 foot to the point of beginning of the parosl herein describedl thence at right angles Lsterlj aloq the 1 North line of lands now or foesarl, owned by L. L. !tiller a distance of SOLS feet to a points,thane• at right antdlos Southerly a distance of 66 test, core or less, to the Northwest earner of s parcel of'Zand oon'grd li by Dea K. lt,therfbrd " T.B. Rutherford to Alias 1t111W and L; Nti ler by dead dated February g, 1929 and recorded in Book 034e of Offieial Records, at pop 2911 thence at right angles Nlbatorly along the Borth ' boundary of said parool of land & distance of IA1.5 test to the Isrumot corner thereofl thence at right angles Northerly a distant of 66.0 feet, ears or 1esa, to a point in the Southerly lines of a treat of land ooatalniag < one half &area, con"red by said Rutherfords to Oraoe ll. Basges."a 1r deed kited fty 9. 1930 and recorded in Book 093' of OffioLl Reoerds, at Pop )?Q; thefts iastarly along the South line of said tract of land ) tomgWed to Grace M, Bergeson, as aforesaid, a distance of 106 feet W the Somsheaet corner thereof; tharv>e North 330 feet, hors or lass, to a point in the North line of said South halt of Southwest quarter of North- east quarter of Section 51 there•e ilesterl,T along sold North sins a distance of 792.0 feet to a point in the dearth and South center lies of said Section 51 thence :;ouch along said line a distance Ot' 3)0 feet, nor* or Les, to � the point of Dediming. ' iv �^ l�li L..�. • J A Z 1 • t� Dated .._......... hi!11.._............................19.....Sb. RATS Of CALLPOR-WLA I •.. O. tto y�pY�IY�,,�—. -.. _. _..._.__... 19 SY . , . `� ).' hw ivti Uwe 0.,, Iq.. rrY.LII1JtYYljii • . _.. —._...... ... Mev, I.M. ... .it ...ri tJy...I+...ftlo...d.. ... %0..J?W.0 Al Ili. KE •E:1 01 �a G----...__.. rr� IW" t --'r*—rte- yllT7E TrnI LM ------- -- —••— — s:.._�� rtan. Deet �__.. o'cJou t.... is memo tr ear'..w_—.a........i...6.4 .. J _ M VA Dalt V•1 F 1C1.1E iE'Ufi(•3 yr ;) BUItE',U'.Ir, AE 1I _....._ C t'.').A , tin Elr•.E M ESI(., Count( ke- wg.....,i.. Nova � r. 173 and blTo U4 A v. NO. wt f & 041 ill"Fe Tt quarttr! T h. 'Ras e k CU at .follows. . - Co Z;i *it running. ithen�* mmon ci N. ng it "t . !'"U 6 ,, ad Nor.th'&U the Saw. 340 Upqp.: ?f 30'! f e e t.:to AoLit . ::; %r4dv*i' iM�.'v4zht:: Or emI k" . Uride 'raids-. Sur7, along'" be-. Noith-line of At; .4 LaftIng: partal of land ..:`art th .glew.1ou erly a. distance ..of to-:--tjiV*6i-fAviit-qorier of -a pare'el of, -Iand.'i6ave C y#t- j"'PsIU-16 lilac Wfor0.--.&Ad To 'B':"Rutherford to Alice MIll 'bfte4--.'&t*4-Februmry.8, 1929 a -'a-revordld Boole'43101 a t. page 281 ' e- arth- bound . ... ... thence I 8T� -Of `d1st*vAe..of.;.j2f'5 feet to the Northeast eafter.4thore'qViinavat-r4 'aglWaVXorLh*rly a distance ght-a of:.66,0,fsit,-*.Mro'lar.;less" t6'4�'..-Oiiftt,�LA,the Southerly line. of by said Rutherfords to Gra.ce- K. Urterson,...by. die4-dated May 9 1930 ji and recorded An`�Book -893"..of Off. ic1al,-,Ri*6rd8,.8t pap, 378: 1 thence Woat:rly'alons the South lineofeaid tract a distance 16, -Loginning. of 1 41.3 fe V the. true.: po lat. of 0"0.00.0 Cm.a. era CY luted _Aly ed^IAr.... . .. . ............................... . ............. ..... ....... Now Q*4w4eF*1 Uoe 0-81 J! STATY 01'CA1.1lvRx1.% ............. .... Al M, RtQj!jf Cf JITLE t'r ._ -9-3 2 i. Aiwe NO' v'b 1M silt pepses AxAmost md4w.j@.AX* slodsibrof JAP %48AJ4 L4:1:rO.4m, Gad Nochomeft-teded 66.460, SUN tAWY.064- PI; I I J C�;U-% I C4 I.VC -*:!A Xotvpy P.Me X T. 18 N. R. 4 E M D. B. & M. 1.37Ac ?8 26- 110 . �3"116 tst.ro Tax Area Code 0 Gr;o 92-00 � 0 TRACT 92-07 W -i 0: CENTER 06 SEC. a 11 <i 92-1'2 306.34 1 02 m � n w B0 ! A N it N - - 145 _ r 664.49 i R 340 196 b 2.11 A< Assessor's Map No. 26-05 NOTE -ASSESSOR'S PARCEL BLOCK County of Butte, Cal. zz % ADVENTIST TRACTM.O. R. BIC. 9 PG. 34 & LOT NUMBERS SHOWN JUN 1996 MAH., /95/ O33 PJ aZ063 1 214' Zai sJ N ?�•5� / w ml 07a O / / H 3 . 11 Ac XI n I \� 2.66.. ' 4� 1 ' 46 O / 32 263 Qr 347.1 196 m S� P/ / 5 AC. 2 pi p / p o e 49 49 Cc a 42 0.6 ACCo in t / / I awl ^ 2.01Ac + ti h 2.52Ac �O n - 19 2.98Ac J // 52 5.00 AC co PM 7-9-762 I e / PM 71-65' -�333.94 2 51 400.01 _262- 05 310.11 2 64 64 Z 1.76 AC 7 92 I Q PM 89-65 229.77 397.33 26 20 u [O Ac v Z o 6.0 AC. 4.82 Ac 264 cS 37 Z�l3o$ J 2.73 AC 04. 15800 © 500--L? St� to 25 Ae 13 8 4.08 Ac 'll %� ��05 It N 1 11 2 AC. N 3 O O 0 q o N 3.79AC. e' M 370.00 °o at 0 12 ab .5Ac 22 .5Ac ;0 4 76AC 4/ Q 1.37Ac ?8 111.5 264 �3"116 tst.ro O Gr;o 117 � ti°0 W -i CENTER 06 SEC. a 07 a <i a B0 A c � r Assessor's Map No. 26-05 NOTE -ASSESSOR'S PARCEL BLOCK County of Butte, Cal. zz % ADVENTIST TRACTM.O. R. BIC. 9 PG. 34 & LOT NUMBERS SHOWN JUN 1996 MAH., /95/ IN CIRCLES '�A,LI�J C� LAS i Sad'- 02(c -©SCS- O2_(,o UP a"' 1 l.�Ll A►� 4I� iS�(,=,� OZ(� - O SCS - ip22Q G3�s ►� , i 1D) ` i j�- Q�— I O 20 ip i 10 02"� YeaL.t�G-.R-22c�r�aa L, . KGL C D H Avow i�Y�T IQ t4A ;00—I \3O A i I J� I d09 !o to 15 zovc�; ., j EL: 026 050 026 000 STATUS: ACTIVE EL: 026 050 030 000 STATUS: ACTIVE BISBEE WILLIAM R & MARGARET B GRIMM H F & NATALIE L 6850 MELVINA AVENUE P 0 BOX 11 PALERMO CA 95968 PALERMO CA 95968 EL: 026 050 008 000 STATUS: ACTIVE EL: 026 050 032 000 STATUS: ACTIVE NELSON PHILIP E ALLEN KENDALL & AMANDA J BOX 233 2185 STANLEY DR PALERMO CA 95968 OROVILLE CA 95965 EL: 026 050 011 000 STATUS: ACTIVE EL: 026 050 037 000 STATUS: ACTIVE GIBSON GWEN ETAL KEE DONNA A P 0 BOX 207 PO BOX 151 PALERMO CA 95968 PALERMO CA 95968 EL: 026 050 013 000 STATUS: ACTIVE EL: 026 050 046 000 STATUS: ACTIVE BRACALI ROGER & JACQUELINE JT HESS CHARLES ETAL AVALAR TERESA P 0 BOX 507 3800 FOOTHILL BLVD ' PALERMO CA 95968 OROVILLE CA 95966 EL: 026 050 020 000 STATUS: ACTIVE EL: 026 050 048 000 STATUS: ACTIVE HINKLE LORETTA SS FAVELA JOSE C & ROMONA B PO BOX 990 6742 ROCKHAVEN CT OROVILLE CA 95965 OROVILLE CA 95966 EL: 026 050 025 000 STATUS: ACTIVE EL: 026 050 049 000 STATUS: ACTIVE BARNES EVERETT W WILLIAMS RODERICK JR & CAROL S CP 1976 SIXTH ST 6741 ROCK HAVEN,CT OROVILLE CA 95965 OROVILLE CA 95966 EL: 026 050 027 000 STATUS: ACTIVE EL: 026 050 052 000 STATUS: ACTIVE CASANOVA MARTHA ETAL TC BUTTE HORSEMANS ASSOCIATION VALDERRAMA LORRIE 6887 LINCOLN BLVD P 0 BOX 352 OROVILLE CA 95965 PALERMO CA 95968 EL: 026 050 028 000 STATUS: ACTIVE EL: 026 060 004 000 STATUS: ACTIVE JOHNSON ROBERT HENRY LIVING TRUST TOKUNO ALBERT JOHNSON ROBERT HENRY TRUSTEE 6901 LINCOLN BLVD 6336 DRIFTWOOD ST OROVILLE CA 95966 SACRAMENTO CA 95831 EL: 026 060 009 000 STATUS: ACTIVE WETMORE C W & THELMA I ` V. 2190 MESSINA AVE PALERMO CA 95968 EL: 026 060 014 000 STATUS: ACTIVE RAYMOND GLORIA 6964 MELVINA i PALERMO CA 95968 EL: 026 060 015 000 STATUS: ACTIVE LOVE MELVIN B & WANDA L 6968 MELVINA AVE PALERMO CA 95968 EL: 026 070 001 000 STATUS: ACTIVE ROGERS ELOISE 6925 MELVINA PALERMO CA 95968 EL: 026 070 032 000 STATUS: ACTIVE' MITCHELL CLAYTON M (I 6965 MELVINA AVENUE PALERMO CA 95968 ! EL: 026 070 033 000 STATUS: ACTIVE WILLIAMS JOE A & SANDRA A P 0 BOX 810 PALERMO CA 95968 L�vzl�v�7' 0 i• R�S"�� 1� - 1 � N � o � < N 0 2 111 • r' 1 N 0 m X13 � ¢ 7 t'��y� � ����� t �( ` 1����sq"p�7 � f � ' w? { . � � � 'nom, V '� � � '�', �Y• _ _ ,�: `�, ..- _ r., � �; c � �J; C. .� �. _ . � ' c V � �- w � , e � ,� � '' � •� %� � c.. � C S C� ( i C + �.,� - ,� � �f? vat - oso- o�-L ,� / cif_ 7s'� ��.�-tea- �����"�'' v 0-z 0000 I, IN- �/? oar-��v- o�� a - �i ' Y'� pigs •,� `, i v°�-�.�^s�G`i„� ,mss.• s e",7 0,-5 �: .o iL-24- /� /� oat_ v.5 -v -,o-2(- may_ r��• � : � o t��-.=` �• mss-, d ���,1 a �� �'^.(j/ r�, k t /qqyy i q i �� c •A �.r 0-1 r _ �� �� oa�� v�sv- oat R P� oa& - v�'o - o 'Y",( Z�,-w ,& Z�— 09 oj'o - oaf �� �va�- vsv- v�� 4� ,mow � �•F� a rJ ,� tj ,������4 ��-"� °' �' IOMME • 1{ 3 a u. r �- ,fir. :�. .�" �� � ! � ,v � ;� rel•` 1 `�• `� ,,uJ�_ >'•�X?�n..��": ;. �`,,,, r. ��' `je'3+• _ .�` ,..,.. _ �n,..c ,� .�.a2 - e _ � /1 /`T �V �� �� v�� - iso - oaf 6-; /4--� CL -P ,� t�q --------------------------------------------------- 1 1 Pr�DCE.ff' Next Day Service, 7 Days a Week. Guaranteed or FREE! PLUS' Applies to 135 and 110 color print film (C41 process), full frame 1 3" and 4" prints. Orders must be in store before daily pick-up. o&nW Photo Processing Not available during holiday periods. � 1'r �-� — d AN M 1 st Initial 897717 ' 312. �of last name 47=1581 . 1014 Oroville Dam Blvd., Oroville, CA 95965 ` Please Print (916) 534-1559 Last Name " '14LAS First L_ Date A % b Address / , v f acq= f ! a Phone sj3 city ab It L L ,, State 04 1 Zip q,5176 9 T111119! 401 IF Aw 2nd,-1QP__t_FREE,! P . 2 Sets 6 siaz'114 X f 09 " n Standard 1 135,11(.. �� � , � t film. 3"Prints El, f C-41 pr( - 1 (If no box is cl I •d size 3t/z" prints) Matte Finish ❑ %. ii s J SiMof IF _ �< < ; i . _ _ Exaa la F Large # lints 1 1 Sc 'y ��� t, H �'' �) 7 5 z LPan 0 .. b.. b g Standard T Prints ❑J? 0,__Matte Finishrama Prints,.,, 31/2X,o Prints ❑glossy color prints from.135 film Panorama format (3 day service).nstructions Extra Large Reprints ❑ Standard Size Reprints ❑ " 1 Enlargements El ovies & Slides ❑ Black & White ❑ Do not staple, fold, write or sticker below this, level. J C 8 9 7 7 1 7 C 047158 X- READ THIS LIABILITY LIMITATION NOTIf✓E:m-.Liability Agreement. You agree to accept an equivalent amount of unexposed,filri or'refuhd o%the•film and processing purchase price as your,ekc lusive remedy and as'the limit of Due liability and the liability of any finisher handling yout film, should ,your film 'or,prihts be damaged or lost or not returned, regardless of your damages, iricluding incidental' and consequential and regardless of your legal theory, including negligence and strict liability, unless we agree, in writing to assume greater obligation and you pay in advance a higher agreed price for this service. Not responsible fo'r orders left more than 30 days. v ;.. Do,'not mon5ten ,-' press firmly: to. seal Eine : 611 per: e Vefope:::: Do not:"nix; roll and negativeii-. eri'`#he -same. envelope 2nd Set FREE Everyday! Uk o4Wlrga0 Photo Processing NejdDaySeivice, 7 Days a Week. Guaranteed or FREE! Applies to 135 and 110 color print film (C41 process), full frame 3" and 4" prints. Orders must be in store before daily pick-up. Not available during holiday periods. lw:j� �.._...rJG�!`Y3 Jdd�l6�d�/w%� -�i�Re �v5X�J'IfTB✓b�i��I�"d✓/�N®. 10 KIDS IN GEAR jilk POINTS ASK CLERK FOR DETAILS Not valid without price shown on opposite side. Offer expires Dec. 31,1996 TO WHOM IT?MAY CONCERN: BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMINSION: i WEr:-THE PEOPLE OF PALERMO,CA.95968,ARE PETTIONING AGAINST; WILLIAM BISBEE--6850;iMEWIMNA AVENUE,PALERMO,CA.95968; GETTING A USE PERMIT,FOR A DOG KENNEL„ AS THIS WILL ONLY LOWERYOUR PROPTERY VALUE:AND THERE IS WAYOT00MUCHNTRAFFIC THERE NOW.THESEDOGS NEVER STOP BARKING DAY)NIGHT,THERE ARE TO MANY ANIMALS ON THIS 6ACERS, HE FEEDS ONCE A DAY, THE ANIMALS CRY BECAUSE THEY ARE HUNGRY AND OR THIRSTY. THE PROPTERY IDENTIFED AS AP•.026--050--026,PALERMO, (SH) ( FILE UP97--16) . THESE ARE PEOPLE YOU MAY CONTACT,AT YOUR REQUEST: MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION 1220 N STREET,ROOM A--126 SACRAMENTO,CA.95814 bill'.. aline SENIOR SPECIAL INVESTIGATOR PHONE 654--0504 DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE BUREAU OF LIVESTOCK IDENTIFICATION P -0 -BOX 1123 OROVILLE,CA.95965 PHONE 533--6298 PAGER 551-75882 KEN RICHARDSON BRAND INSPECTOR ANIMAL CONTROL OROVILLE,CA.95965 PHONE 538--7409 DR:;.:" JAN HERHENHOUSE SACRAMENTO,CA. PHONE 551--6372 CC -BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISION THOMAS A.PARILO,DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NAME E E 14J �4 106 6 -p6 -/0i Planning Division JUN 2 4 1991 oroville, California ESS A-uxz v C4 6-akn SIZ 53) , t?/ s -7q/7 ---7-- -:� - .3, / 1117 533._ 9 25 -� -?3 - 533•- -3,9o 1 S f Date 02/03/98 Development Services Depar tent Time 2:32 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet UP 97=16 * William R. Bisbee 6850 Melvina Avenue Palermo, CA 95968 In reference to : Use Permit, AP#026-050-026 Rounding : None Full Precision : No Last bill / / Last aging Last charge 07/10/97 Last payment / / Amount $0.00 Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMOUNT 12/02/96 Teri'B. / C 1.00 34.00 #10393 Clerical 34.00 12/30/96 Teri B. / C 1.00 34.00 #10597 Clerical 34.00 12/30/96 Steve H. / P 0.50 29.50 #10638 Processing 59.00 01/13/97 Larry P. / P 2.25 132.75 #10710 Processing 59.00 01/13/97 Paula L. / P 0.25 14.75_ #10733 Processing 59.00 01/27/97 Steve H. / P 1.00 59.00 #10870 Processing 59.00 02/24/97 Steve H. / P 0.50 29.50 #11077 Processing 59.00 04/07%97 Steve H. / P 4.25 250.75 #11419 Processing 59.00 04/21/97 Craig S. / P 1.00 59.00 #11502 Processing 59.00 04/21/97 Steve H. / P 1.00 59.00 #11523 Processing 59.00 05/05/97 Steve H. / P 1.00 59.00 #11614 Processing 59.00 05/19/97 Lynn R. / C 3.25 146.25 #11641 Clerical 45.00 Page 1 - TOTAL r f Date 02/03/98 qevelopment Service`s Departent Time 2:32 pm Applicant Billing'Worksheet UP 97-16 * :William R. Bisbee (continued) Date/Slip# Description 05/19/97 Craig S. / P #11708 Processing 05/19/97 Steve H. / P , #11732 Processing 06/16/97 Lynn R. / C #11891 Clerical 06/16/97 Steve H. / P #11919 Processing 06/16/97 Craig S. / P #11939 Processing 06/30/97 Lynn R. / C #12023 Clerical TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES HOURS/RATE 0.75 59.00 2.50 59.00 2.00 45.00 0.75 59.00 0.25 59.00 0.75 45.00 24.00 Date/Slip# Description OTY/PRICE 05/28/97 Teri B. / $C 1 #11634 Publish Legal Notice in Chico 26.10 Enterprise Record TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS TOTAL NEW CHARGES PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 12/09/96 Deposit - Receipt #15695 (400.00) 01/30/98 Judgement for William R. Bisbee, (908.10) Collection Cancelled TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS $1,308.10 ($1,308.10) Page 2 AMOUNT TOTAL 44.25 147.50 90.00 44.25 14.75 33.75 $1,282.00 26.10 $26.10 TOTAL NEW CHARGES PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 12/09/96 Deposit - Receipt #15695 (400.00) 01/30/98 Judgement for William R. Bisbee, (908.10) Collection Cancelled TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS $1,308.10 ($1,308.10) L� 1 Date 02/03/98 Development Services Depar ment Time 2:32 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet UP 97-16 * :William R. Bisbee (continued) NEW BALANCE TOTAL NEW BALANCE C i Page 3 $0.00 • 3 ILL BUTTE COUNTY CENTRAL COLLECTIONS 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE9 CA 95965 PLANNING DEFT - USE PERMIT 9 • DATE° 01-30-98 CLIENT NO. 1004210900 The following debtors assigned by you to this agency have been removed from active collection processes. Please notify us immediately if the action was taken in error. Thank: you for the opportunity to be of service to you. ACCOUNT NAME ASSIGNED PRINCIPAL. CAN. AMT. ACCOUNT NUMBER BISBEE9 WILLIAM R 17 SEP 97 JUDGMENT FOR DEBTOR TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS: TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT CANCELLED: Sincerely„ BUTTE COUNTY 916-538-7362 908010 908°10 UP 97-16 1 $908010 PIWOlil:l;ittt� mNtSlD F E 0 01 '9g.9 0,Qvjjj0AQ'R$' mWa11 INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR'S OFFICE TO: Christine Bell FROM: Jill Broderson SUBJECT: COLLECTION R QUEST DATE: September 11, 1997 William R. Bisbee applied for a Use Permit on approximately December 9, 1996. The request was denied by the Planning Commission on June 26, 1997. The costs exceeded his partial deposit of $400.00 by $908.10. A letter dated July 16, 1997, including an itemized bill, (see attached) was mailed to William R. Bisbee requesting that the $908.10 be submitted within thirty days. On August 20, 1997, a second notice was mailed (see attached). As of this date, the exceeded amount has not been received. Therefore, we are requesting your services. Applicant: William R. Bisbee Address: 6859 Melvina Avenue Palermo, CA 95968 Telephone: 534-8441 Request: Use Permit to allow a dog kennel on property located at 6850 Melvina Avenue, Palermo. File No. UP 97-16, AP#026-050-026 Amount Owed: $908.10 Fund: 10 Revenue: 4210900 If or when you receive the past due amount, please notify me. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please call me. My extension is 6869. Thank you! JB: Attachments 1. Letter dated July 16, 1997 2. Follow -Up Letter dated August 20, 1997 j\docs\refunds\collect.wpd i . 'i Nov -18-97 16:40 BUTTE COUNTY ADMIN 916 538.7120 • CLAIM AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITY• �- THE COUNTY OF BUTTE In the Matter of Claim of pp �� � �.a_.+r,� ,Claimant, vs. D S 2 The County of Butte P_02 RISK ANA NOV 1 0 1997 OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA (claimant) hereby presents this claim to the County of Butte pursuant to Section 910 of the California Government Code. 1. The name and post office address of claimant is as follows: 2. The post office address to which(person presenting claim) desires notice of this claim to be sent is as follows: 3. 19 , at (location where injury received) claimant received damages or injuries under the following circumstances: (Specify facts and circumstances of acciden giving rise to claim, including description f publi property, where appropriate.) It-�$, �� *� , oma, r .� �.�.i �'�•oo -AV' -tee 4. et forth circumstances and facts of injury and ensuing damages. 5. So far as it is known to __...__(person presenting claim) at the date of filing this claim, (person injured) has incurred damages in the amount of Dollars due to the following injuries: (specify) LA'13 (ii - (C' Where person presenting claim knows of public employer or employees causing injury and damage, specify, if such name or names are not known, so state. 7. At the time of presentation of this claim (person injured) claims damages in the arYlount uf_, Dollars including approximately__. Dollars due to prospective injuries and damage, computed on the basis of the following: Dated---// — . 7 -,197-7— Note, ,197-7— Note, Instructions on reverse side. . Please use additional sheets of paper, if necessary. ,rm S-6 0-83 Aev.) (Signature) INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR'S OFFICE TO: Christine Bell FROM: Jill Broderson SUBJECT: COLLECTION REQUEST DATE: September 11, 1997 William R. Bisbee applied for a Use Permit on approximately December 9, 1996. The request was denied by the Planning Commission on June 26, 1997. The costs exceeded his partial deposit of $400.00 by $908.10. A letter dated July 16, 1997, including an itemized bill, (see attached) was mailed to William R. Bisbee requesting that the $908.10 be submitted within thirty days. On August 20, 1997, a second notice was mailed (see attached). As of this date, the exceeded amount has not been received. Therefore, we are requesting your services. Applicant: William R. Bisbee Address: 6859 Melvina Avenue Palermo, CA 95968 Telephone: 534-8441 Request: Use Permit to allow a dog kennel on property located at 6850 Melvina Avenue, Palermo. File No. UP 97-16, AP#026-050-026 Amount Owed: $908.10 Fund: 10 Revenue: 4210900 If or when you receive the past due amount, please notify me. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please call me. My extension is 6869. Thank you!. JB: Attachments 1. Letter dated July 16, 1997 2. Follow -Up Letter dated August 20, 1997 j\docsVefu n ds\co11ect.wpd N ,, , :.fin .•c;�'. . August 20, 1997 William R. Bisbee 6850 Melvina Avenue Palermo, CA 95968 RE: Use Permit Application File No. UP 97-16 Dear Mr. Bisbee: L A N D O F NATURAL W EALTH A N D BEAUTY DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 A letter dated July 16, 1997, was mailed to you requesting that you remit a check payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $908.10 because the costs to process your above -referenced application exceeded your partial deposit of $400.00 by $908.10. We have not yet received payment. Please make a check payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $908.10 and remit it to the Planning Division at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California 95965 within 15 calendar days. Should we not receive your final payment, we must turn this account over to Butte County Central Collections. Should you have any questions, please contact Brian Larsen in this office Monday thru Thursday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at 538-7601. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services TAP:jb Attachment jAdocsVefundsV-notice.wpd I July 16, 1997 William R. Bisbee 6850 Melvina Avenue Palermo, CA 95968 RE: Use Permit, AP#026-050-026 File No. UP 97-16 Dear Mr. Bisbee: • ,gulf¢ C. OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538.7785 The total cost for the processing of the above -referenced application which was denied by the Planning Commission on June 26, 1997, is $1,308.10. As of December 9, 1996, a partial deposit was made in the amount of $400.00. The costs exceeded the deposit by $908.10. Following is a breakdown: Professional Planner $ 811.25 Mapping $ 132.75 Clerical $ 338.00 Publishing of Legal Notice in the Chico Enterprise Record, 5-28-97 26.10 Total $1,308.10 Partial Deposit, Receipt No. 15695 400.00 Total Amount Due & Payable -~ $ 908.10 Please make a check payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $908.10 and remit it to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 within 30 calendar days. Should you have any questions, please contact Brian Larsen in this office Monday through Thursday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at 538-7601. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services TAP: jb aj�> Date 07/15;/97 'Revelopment Services Departent Time 1:02 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet UP 97-16 * William R. Bisbee 6850 Melvina Avenue Palermo, CA 95968 In reference to : Use Permit, AP#026-050-026 Rounding : None Full Precision : No Last bill / / Last aging Last charge 07/10/97 Last payment / / Amount $0.00 Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMOUNT 12/02/96 Teri B. / C 1.00 34.00 #10393 Clerical 34.00 12/30/96 Teri B. / C 1.00 34.00 #10597 Clerical 34.00 12/30/96 Steve H. / P 0.50 29.50 #10638 Processing 59.00 01/13/97 Larry P. / P 2.25 132.75 #10710 Processing 59.00 01/13/97 Paula L. / P 0.25 14.75 #10733 Processing 59.00 01/27/97 Steve H. / P 1.00 59.00 #10870 Processing 59.00 02/24/97 Steve H. / P 0.50 29.50 #11077 Processing 59.00 04/07/97 Steve H. / P 4.25 250.75 #11419 Processing 59.00 04/21/97 Craig S. /.P 1.00 59.00 #11502 Processing 59.00 04/21/97 Steve H. / P 1.00 59.00 #11523 Processing 59.00 05/05/97 Steve H. / P 1.00 59.00 #11614 , Processing 59.00 05/19/97 Lynn R. / C 3.25 146.25 #11641 Clerical 45.00 Page 1 TOTAL i Date 07/15;/97 Development Services Department Time 1:02 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet UP 97-16 * :William R. Bisbee (continued) Date/Slip# Description 05/19/97 Craig S. / P #11708 Processing 05/19/97 Steve H. / P #11732 Processing 06/16/97 Lynn R. / C #11891 Clerical 06/16/97 Steve H. / P #11919 Processing 06/16/97 Craig S. / P #11939 Processing 06/30/97 Lynn R. / C #12023 Clerical TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES HOURS/RATE AMOUNT 0.75 44.25 59.00 2.50 147.50 59.00 2.00 90.00 45.00 0.75 44.25 59.00 0.25 14.75 59.00 0.75 33.75 45.00 24.00 Date/Slip# Description OTY/PRICE 05/28/97 Teri B. / $C 1 #11634 Publish Legal Notice in Chico 26.10 Enterprise Record TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS 26.10 TOTAL NEW CHARGES PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 12/09/96 Deposit - Receipt #15695 (400.00) TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS ' Page 2 TOTAL $1,282.00 $26.10 $1,308.10 ($400.00) Date 07/1/97 Development Services Department Time 1:02 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 3 UP 97-16 * :William R. Bisbee (continued) NEW BALANCE New Current period 908.10 TOTAL NEW BALANCE $908.10 June 30,_ 1997 William Bisbee 6850 Melvina Avenue Palermo, CA 95968 Re: Use Permit, AP 026-050-026, UP 97-16 Dear Mr. Bisbee: • a: ,tuft¢ Co PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 The Butte County Planning Commission held a meeting on June 26, 1997, regarding your request for a Use Permit to allow a dog kennel on property zoned AR -MH -1 located at 6850 Melvina avenue, Palermo, was denied pursuant to the findings attached. Should you desire to appeal this decision you must do so, in writing, with the appeal fee of $250.00 to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to the expiration of the 10 -day appeal period which is at 5:00 p.m., Monday, July 7, 1997. The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Judicial review must be sought not later than the 90th day following the date on which this decision becomes final, except that where a shorter time limit is provided by State or Federal law, such shorter time limit shall apply. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Hackney at this- office between 8:00 a.m and -4:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant /Ir u EXHIBIT "A" Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. An Initial Study has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. B. Potentially significant environmental impacts may result from approval of this application. C. The Initial Study has been independently reviewed, analyzed and considered and reflects the independent judgement of the County of Butte. Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. ' The proposed use of the property, pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-100, may conflict with, impair or be detrimental to the uses both permitted and conditional in the ARMH-1 zone and the Agricultural Residential General Plan designation in which.it is located and/or adjoins: Existing development pattern has numerous residential structures within 300 feet of the proposed use; and 2. The ARMH-1 zone will allow for the creation of more than 100 new parcels immediately adjacent to the project site; and 3. The keeping of animals, including dogs, has resulted in several complaints regarding noise and sanitation on this property. Increasing the number of dogs will increase the land use incompatibility with adjacent parcels. B. The proposed use will be incompatible with,. or injurious to, surrounding properties in that the project site has not existed compatibly with adjacent properties for several,years and it is not reasonable to expect that approval of this application, even conditioned to address the identified potential impacts, will reduce such impacts to a level of insignificance; and C. The proposed use of the property will be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood, or to the general health, welfare- and safety of the residents of the County in that the proposed use will exacerbate existing conditions associated with identified impacts. �,••��irr.,� fir,-r�-.:.,.......... �,• u e o PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 May 29, 1997 William R. Bisbee 6850 Melvina Avenue Palermo, CA 95968 Re: Use Permit, AP 026-050-026, UP97-16 Dear Mr. Bisbee: A public hearing has been set for June 26, 1997, at 9:00 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be present at.the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Hackney of this office at 538-7601, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. Sincerely, ec,4� xe4c-,C�� 1.� Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Services Assistant kAformslschedule.frm 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 May 28, 1997 William R. Bisbee 6850 Melvina Ave. Palermo, CA 95968 RE: Use Permit, AP#026-050-026 File No. UP 97-16 Dear Mr. Bisbee: I have enclosed the staff report and Initial study for your Use Permit. Please review both and if you have any questions, please call me at 538-7601, Monday thru Thursday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, Stephen Hackney Associate Planner encl. • Use Permit: William R Bisbee, UP #97-16 COUNTY OF BUTTE INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS I. BACKGROUND: Name of Proponent William Bisbee 2. Address 6850 Melvina Avenue, Palermo, CA 95968 Phone(916)534-8441 3. Name of Proposal, if applicable 4. Type of Project Use Permit 5. Project Description and Location of Parcel(s) The request is for a Use Permit to allow a 320 square foot structure consisting of 10 stalls, 11 dogs and 12 runs on a six (6) acre parcel in Palermo. The applicant has indicated he plans to keep up to 11 hunting type dogs (hounds) of his own in the kennels. Occassionally he might keep a friends dog for a brief time. The applicant does not propose a commercial venture and will not have any employees. There are no plans to breed dogs. The applicant likes to hunt and wants the dogs for his personal use. Currently the site has a single family residence and a barn and an assortment of animal life on the 6 acre site. The project site is zoned ARMHA (Agricultural Residential Mobile Home -1 acre minimum) and has a general plan designation of Agricultural Residential. The project site is surrounded by parcels ranging in size from 1/4 acre to 5+acres. All surrounding parcels have ARMHA zoning and Agricultural Residential land use designation. The parcel is bordered by residences on all sides. Surrounding residences average less than 300 feet from the project site. The topography is fairly level, and while there is an assortment of trees along Melvina Avenue and bordering the property, there is no natural screen blocking the project site from the neighbors. Water is provided by a private well and sewer service is provided by a septic system. Access to the parcel is from Melvina Avenue via Messina Avenue, Palermo.' 6. Assessor's Parcel Numbers 026-050-026 II. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will NOT be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION with mitigation(s) will be prepared. I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 5_ 0 mplete by: Stephen 11ackney. Assoc' to Planner Dat viewe y: Craig Sanders, Senior Planner Date 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division ❑ • Use Permit: William R Bisbee, UP #97-16 L� ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. X Land Use and Planning 0 Transportation/Circulation X Public Services 0 Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities and Service Systems ❑ Geophysical ❑ Energy and Mineral Resources 0 Aesthetics ❑ Water X Hazards ❑ Cultural Resources 0 Air Quality X Noise ❑ Recreation EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except 'No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant if there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in a earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 Use Pem-lit: William R Bisbee, UP #97-16 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the, project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? X X X X X Response: The project request, a Use Permit for a 10 -stall dog kennel with 12 runs for 11 dogs, does not conflict with the general plan designation or zoning. The Agricultural Residenfial General Plan designation allows for intense animal uses as a secondary use and makes provisions for quasi -public uses. The proposed dog kennel conforms to this criteria in that it is clearly an intense animal use. While the ARMH-1 (Agricultural Residential Mobile Home -1 acre min.) zone does allow for animal keeping, it was modified in February 1995 to specifically require a use permit to allow kennels based on past interpretations of animal keeping. The request for a dog kennel with this intensity of use may be incompatible with existing land use adjacent to the property. Although the neighboring properties have an assortment of animals, this property cunently has the largest assortment and intensity of animal use. Approval of a dog kennel for an add►tional 11 dogs, may result in impacts (noise and sanitation) that would be incompatible with the residential character of the neighborhood (See Response for Items #4, 9 & 10). There is a potenfial for increased parceling on the surrounding parcels. Most of the parcels are more than two acres in size, with a one acre minimum zoning classification. With future parceling the density of the neighborhood could potentially increase fourfold. Mitigation: None required. 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal,• a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 3 Potentially Significant Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the, project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? X X X X X Response: The project request, a Use Permit for a 10 -stall dog kennel with 12 runs for 11 dogs, does not conflict with the general plan designation or zoning. The Agricultural Residenfial General Plan designation allows for intense animal uses as a secondary use and makes provisions for quasi -public uses. The proposed dog kennel conforms to this criteria in that it is clearly an intense animal use. While the ARMH-1 (Agricultural Residential Mobile Home -1 acre min.) zone does allow for animal keeping, it was modified in February 1995 to specifically require a use permit to allow kennels based on past interpretations of animal keeping. The request for a dog kennel with this intensity of use may be incompatible with existing land use adjacent to the property. Although the neighboring properties have an assortment of animals, this property cunently has the largest assortment and intensity of animal use. Approval of a dog kennel for an add►tional 11 dogs, may result in impacts (noise and sanitation) that would be incompatible with the residential character of the neighborhood (See Response for Items #4, 9 & 10). There is a potenfial for increased parceling on the surrounding parcels. Most of the parcels are more than two acres in size, with a one acre minimum zoning classification. With future parceling the density of the neighborhood could potentially increase fourfold. Mitigation: None required. 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal,• a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 3 Use Permit: William R Bisbee, UP #97-16 projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, II " Potentially Significant Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact X X especla y a ordable housing r X Response: Approval of the request is not going to aff ect population or housing projections. The project area is built out in terns of existing housing on each parcel. The current zoning would permit additional land division on the applicants parcel and on most of the adjacent parcels. However, the application is for a use permit not for a land division. The approval of a use permit for a dog kennel is not going to have any effect density or affordability of housing. Mitigation: None required. 3. GEOPHYSICAL. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Seismicity: fault rupture? X b) Seismicity: ground shaking/ liquefaction? X C) Seismicity: seiche? X d) Landslides or mudslides? X e) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill? X f) Subsidence of the land? X g) Expansive soils? X h) Unique geologic or physical features? X Response: Approval of the request will not create any significant geophysical or topographical impacts that will result in any deterioration of the environment or place people at any significant risk. The Project site is located in the Foothill Shear Zone (Butte County Constraints Map). Any future earthquakes, especially as experienced in this area in 1975, will result in the area residents experiencing some degree of ground shaking. No new residents are proposed by this project. The soil characteristics of the site, Redding sandy gravelly loam, is identified as having moderate to ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 4 • Use Permit: William R Bisbee, UP #97-16 i Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Sibnificant No Impact Impact high erosion potential. The characteristics of the project site, level with little slope, is such that little erosion would likely occur. Mitigation: None required. 4. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? 0 Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavation? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? h) Impacts to groundwater quality? X X X X X X X X ResaonseApproval of the request may have minor incremental effects on absorption rates due to the construction of an additional 320 square foot structure. The overall effect will be minimal on a parcel this size. Approval of the request is not going to have any impacts upon the groundwater. Approval of this project may have a potentially significant impact from surface water runoff, due to dog feces and other animal wastes, to surface waters. To address this potential impact a mitigation measure for a septic system to handle dog feces is necessary to adequately address such a potential impact. MITIGATION #1: The kennel operator shall clean and remove all excrement from the kennel on ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 5 • Use Pemvt: William R Bisbee, UP #97-16 • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact a weekly basis and dispose of excrement in septic tank. The septic tank shall be pumped once a month or as needed or directed by the Butte County Environmental Health Division.. S. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? X X X X Response: Approval of the request may result in objectionable odors arising from increased dog feces if not property on a regular basis. The project site already is home to a wide array of animal life: horses, mules, goats, pigs, geese, ducks, peacocks, chickens, and dogs which already contribute to a fair amount of animal waste onsite. The addition of 11 dogs may result in a significant increase to the present conditions. Mitigation: See Mitigation #1, Item 4. 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses d) Insufficient parking capacity onsite/ offsite? e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? 0 Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation X X X X X ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ C� • Use Permit: William R Bisbee, UP #97-16 (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? 0 Potentially Significant Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact X X h) Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including public transportation services? X Response: Approval of the request may have incremental effects on traffic to and from the site. The applicant has indicated that occasionally he may board fiends' dogs. However, most of the dogs using the kennel will belong to the applicant. Mitigation: None required. 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g heritage trees)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? X X X X X ResponseApproval of the request is not going to have any impact on any plant or animal species on the rare, endangered or threatened species list. The project site has been heavily used over the years by a variety of animals who have tramped the ground with hoofs, claws, webbed feet, and paws. Most plant life onsite has been eaten, chewed, knibbled, and grazed for many years. Oak, pine and eucalyptus trees exist on and offsite. Approval of the project is not going to effect any trees. Several low areas filled with water and presumably animal urine exist onsite, but no formal wetlands. Mitigation: None required. 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 7 Use Permit: William R Bisbee, UP #97-16 Potentially Significant Less Potentialy Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact conservation plans? X b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? X c) Conflict with the extraction of identified, significant mineral resources? X Response: The proposed construction of a 320 square foot structure to house the dog kennel is going to use a minimal amount of nonrenewable resources. Mitigation: None required. 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? X X X X X Response: Approval of the request is not expected to expose the public to any health hazards. The dogs will be kept in kennels with dog runs provided for them. The property site is fenced all the way around the property. Assuming the dogs' excrement is collected and disposed of in a regularly scheduled manner, and that all the dogs receive regular rabies shots, any threat of transmission of diseases is reduced (See Response, Item 4 regarding animal waste disposal). Access to the site is a paved public street. Emergency vehicles will have no problem accessing the site. Mitigation: See Mitigation #1, Item 4. 10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? X ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 8 Use Permit: William R Bisbee, UP #97-16 Potentially Significant Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X Response: Approval of the request to permit an additional eleven (11) dogs at this site will incrementally and cumulatively have a significant impact on the surrounding area. The applicant described having huntingftund dogs in the kennel. The breed of dog the applicant has discussed bringing to his property is known for its 'howling'. Currently the applicant has at least one hound onsite. Existing noise levels resulting from dog howling has already disrupted the neighbors on an ongoing basis. The Butte County Animal Control officer has been called out to the site on several occasions because neighbors have complained about the noise from this (these) dogs. This officer has stated that any permit approval for additional dogs will result in additional nuisance complaints (see Comments from Butte County Animal Control). There may be mitigation measures that could address this condition, such as requiring the dogs to have anti -baric collars; or, that a sprinkler system be installed in the kennel so that whenever the dogs howled the sprinklers would be activated, drenching the dogs and (dampening their spirits) discouraging them from barking. MITIGATION #2: Prior to final inspection of kennel structure, the applicant shall install a noise activated "anti -bark" sprinkler system in the structure. MITIGATION #3: The kennel operation shall not create average noise levels in excess of 55dB at property lines. If average noise levels exceed this level for a sustained one hour period or on a daily basis, noise mitigation measures shall be implemented that may include, in addition to the noise activated sprinkler system, sound walls, "anti -bark collars" or other methods approved by the Department of Development Services. Any necessary noise mitigation measures shall be installed within one month of being identified as necessary. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? X b) Police protection? X c) Schools? X d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X e) Other governmental services? X Response: Approval of the request will not result in the need for new or additional services except in the area of animal control. Approval of the use permit may result in additional complaints from neighbors which will require additional responses from Butte County Animal Control (see Comments from Butte County Animal Control), particularly if noise mitigations are not followed. Mitigation: See Mitigation in Item #10 ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ �7 Use Permit William R Bisbee, UP #97-16 Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Less Unless Than Mitigation Significant Incorporated Impact No Impact 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? X b) Communications systems? X c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? X d) Sewer or septic tanks?. X e) Storm water drainage? X f) Solid waste disposal? X g) Special Districts? X Response: Approval of the request is not going to result in any need for new systems. Services are already present onsite. Mitigation: None required. 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or designated scenic highway? X b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? X c) Create light or glare? X Response: Approval of the request is not going to result in any significant impacts to scenic vistas or to the area's aesthetics. U Mitigation: None required. 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal. a) Disturb paleontological resources? X b) Disturb archaeological resources? X c) Affect historical resources? X ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 10 0 Use Permit: William R Bisbee, UP #97-16 d) Have the potential to cause a physical -change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict eAsting religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? is Potentially Significant Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated . Impact Impact X X Response: Approval of the request is not going to have any significant impacts upon any cultural resources. Had there existed any such resources at surface or near surface level they would have been destroyed by years ago by the impacts from the kept animals. Construction of the kennel structure is not likely to impact any unknown subsurface resource. Mitigation: None required 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal. a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreation facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? X X Response: Approval of the request is not going to result in any additional demands upon recreational facilities. Mitigation: None required. 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 11 0 Use Permit: William R Bisbee, UP #97-16 Potentially Significant Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact or prehistory? X b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). X c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human being, either directly or indirectly? X Response: Approval of the request will not have any significant impacts upon the quality of the environment, in as much as no significant impacts will result on any wildlife populations, either to plant or animal species. No known cultural resources exist onsite. There are no known cumulative impacts which would result from approval of the request. Approval of the request will result in potentially significant noise impacts to the surrounding neighbors. The addition of another eleven (11) dogs (hounds) will result in an increase in nuisance complaints to Butte County Animal Control. The property site currently has quite a number (uncounted by staff) of assorted animals. However, the addition of a dog kennel populated by hunfing dogs (as described by the applicant to stall) will significantly increase the current noise level. Currently that noise level is disruptive enough to the neighborhood that Butte County Animal Control has been called to the site on a number of occasions. Approval of the request will only compound the noise impacts to the neighborhood. Approval of the request may also result in sanitation problems unless a proper sepfic system, both infrastructure and scheduling, is instituted. Mitigation: See Mitigation Measures in Items 4 & 10. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 12 :7 Use Pemrit: William R Bisbee, UP #97-16 • V. MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: MITIGATION #1: The kennel operator shall clean and remove all excrement from the kennel on a weekly basis and dispose of excrement in septic tank. The septic tank shall be pumped once a month or as needed or directed by the Butte County Environmental Health Division.. MITIGATION #2: Prior to final inspection of kennel structure, the applicant shall install a noise activated "anti -bark" sprinkler system in the structure. MITIGATION #3: The kennel operation shall not create average noise levels in excess of 55dB at property lines. If average noise levels exceed this level for a sustained one hour period or on a daily basis, noise mitigation measures shall be implemented that may include, in addition to the noise activated sprinkler system, sound walls, "anti -bark collars" or other methods approved by the Department of Development Services. Any necessary noise mitigation measures shall be installed within one month of being identified as necessary. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 13 Use Permit: William R Bisbee, UP 997-16 DATA SHEET A. Project DescriDtion 1. Type of Project: Use Permit 2. Proposed Density of Development: n/a 3. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: minimal 4. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Melvina Avenue off of Messina Avenue 5. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic systems. 6. Source of Water Supply: Individual wells. 7. Proximity of Power Lines: To property. 8. Potential for further land divisions and development: There is potential further land divisions under existing zoning with up to 6 parcels being created. B. Environmental Setting 1. Terrain a General Topographic Character: relatively level with no unique topographical features b. Slopes: 0 to 2% C. Elevation: 200 feet above sea level. d. Limiting Factors: flood plain 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics: Redding gravelly sandy loam b. Limiting Factors: erosion 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zone: Foothills Shear Zone b. Erosion Potential: moderate to high C. Landslide Potential: none d. Fire Hazard: unclassified urbanized area e. Expansive Soil Potential: low to high 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water: none b. Ground Water: Unknown C. Drainage Characteristics: west to Wyman Ravine d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 22 inches per year. e. Limiting Factors: flood plain 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. 7. Air Quality: Good, except when stagnant air conditions persist in the valley. 8. Vegetation: variety of trees: oak, pine and eucalyptus ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 14 • Use Permit: William R Bisbee, UP #97-16 .9. Wildlife Habitat: none present - property is inhabited by an assortment of kept animal life. 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: moderate to high sensitivity area. 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Agricultural Residential 12. E)dsting Zoning: ARMH-1 13. E)dsting Land Use on-site: residential; keeping of assortment of animals (horses, mules, goats, pigs, geese, ducks, peacocks, chickens, and dogs) 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: residential uses on parcels ranging from 1/4 ac to 6 ac b. Zoning: ARMHA C. Gen. Plan Designation: Agricultural Residential d. Parcel Sizes: 1/4 ac to 6 ac 15. Character of Site and Area: rural residential 16. Nearest Urban Area: Palermo 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: none 18. Improvement Standards Urban Area: none 19. Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest County (State) Fre Station: Station number 72 approldmately 1/2 mile away. b. Water Availability: Fire tankers only. 20. Schools: Palermo Union School District ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1 Seismic Safety Element Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2 Seismic Safety Element Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1 Safety Element Oroville, CA CH2M Hill, 1977. 4. Butte County Planning Department. _Erosion Potential Map 111-2 Safety Element Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Elmansive Soils Map 111-3 Safety Element Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV -1 Scenic Highway Element Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1 Scenic Highway Element Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4 Safety Element Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Map. Oroville, CA. 11. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency, State of California, 1983. 12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No 67-178 Oroville, CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Maps Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1989. 14. USGS Quad Maps. 15. Soil Map. Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area United States Department of Agriculture. 16. Soil Survev of Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area United States Department of Agriculture. 17. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 15 0 Use Permit: William R Bisbee, UP #97-16 Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 16 May 27, 1997 William R. Bisbee 6850 Melvina Avenue Palermo, CA 95968 RE: Use Permit, AP#026-050-026 File No. UP 97-16 Dear Mr. Bisbee'. .19 1;utte Count DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 On December 9, 1996, our office received an application for a Use Permit accompanied by a partial deposit in the amount of $400.00. Your project is being processed by our staff on a "real time" billing basis. To date your project has incurred charges totaling $761.25. Butte County Code, Sec. 3-44 © states, in part, "When the initial deposited funds are depleted to an amount equal to twenty-five (25) percent of the original deposit, no additional processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits with Butte County sufficient funds to restore a balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit". Due to the complexity of your project, processing to date has exceeded your partial deposit by $361.25. To continue the processing of your project we will require that a check in the amount of $661.25 be mailed or delivered to our office on or before June 10, 1997. This amount should cover processing of your application through the final stage and complete your final application deposit. If you have any questions, please contact Brian Larsen Monday through Thursday between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, ti�vh `7 FU 2 Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services TAP: jb BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on Thursday, June 26, 1997 at 9:00 a.m. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Orov_ille, California, regarding the following item at the following time: ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MITIGATION MEASURES . REGARDING. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED 9:00 a.m. - William. Bisbee - Use permit for a dog kennel, to allow a 320 square foot structure consisting of 10 stalls, 11 dogs and 12 runs on a six (6) acre parcel on property zoned AR -MH -1 (Agricultural Residential - Mobile Home -1 acre parcels) located at 6850 Melvina Avenue, approximately 1,700 feet north of Messina Avenue, identified as AP 026-050-026, Palermo. (SH) (File UP97- 16) ITEM DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 9:00 a.m. - Myron Openshaw and Michele Weaver - Use Permit to allow a small and large animal veterinary clinic, including an.animal husbandry business, on property zoned "U" (Unclassified) and S -H (Scenic Highway) located on the west side of Clark Road, approximately 700 feet north of Highway 70, identified as AP 041-150-042, Butte College area. (SB) (UP97-22) The above mentioned applications, Initial Study, and maps are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised- at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION THOMAS A. PARILO, DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Oroville Mercury, Wednesday, May 28, 1997. y LEAD - II�i SHEET FILE NO: UP 97-16 AP# 02co-050- ozcp APPLICANT: William R. Bisbee, 6850 Melvina Ave_, PalPrmnCA 95968 Name Addy OWNER: Same Name Address RESPRESENTATIVE: Name address REQUEST: JSL" Oz-'M%i -6r Menne( -For dugs _ SIZE, 1,,> LOCATION: A+ t -e0,50 —Me1.,-.aQ Ale: ok ``Mess ing Avg ('�I.�rna SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT # 2 EXISTING ZONING: M r( N ' a - ZONING HISTORY: SURROUNDING ZONING: N�M A - 7— SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: A�7ricyl��cnt- ResiG�e���a( APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: k:\forms\lead-in Icor COMAMNT DISTRIBUTION LIST APPLICATION: William Bisbee UP 97-16 DATE: December 9. 1996 County Offices and Cities: Chief Administrative Officer X Develop. Services Director "IX Public Works Director �_ Environmental Health Building Manager _ Sheriff _ BCAG _ ALUC X_ LAFCo APCD Butte Co. Farm Bureau _ Biggs — _ Gridley Chico' — _ Oroville — — Paradise _ Chico Airport Commission -4— Agricultural Commission Irrigation District: ;� , — Butte Water _ Biggs/W. Gridley Water — Durham Irrigation�� — OWID — Paradise Irrigation — Richvale Irrigation — Table Mountain Irrigation — Thermalito Irrigation — Other Domestic Water _ Butte Water District _ California Water Service Co. _ Del Oro Water Co. — OWID — Thermalito Irrigation District — Other Sewer — Butte Water District — Themalito Irrigation — Sterling City Sewer Main — Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) — L.O.A. PUD Fire Protection _X_ California Department of Forestry — El Medio Fire Protection District Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Durham Area Recreation _ Feather River Rec. & Park Paradise Recreation & Park Richvale Recreation & Parks Utilities _ PG&E North - Chico _ Chambers Cable TV _ Pacific Bell PG&E South - Oroville Viacom Cable TV State Agencies — CalTrans — Dept of Water Resources — Dept. of Fish and Game — Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter) _ Dept of Parks and Rec. — Highway Patrol — Central Reg. Water Quality Control — Department of Conservation — Off. of Mining Reclamation — Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations Federal Agencies — US Forest Service — US Bureau of Land Management Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. — Lime Saddle Dist — Community Association — Mosq. Abatement. Oroville/Butte Co — Drainage — Butte Env.l Council — Paradise Pines Com. — Reclamation — Cal Native Plant Society - - Butte Co. Mining Committee — — —� 4 ARMH-5 City of Oro i........................................... H UP 97-16 AP# 026-050-026 William Bisbee H- A-5 MDR i ERROR: invalidrestore OFFENDING COMMAND: restore STACK: BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT APPLICANT: WILLIAM R. BISBEE DATE: February 3, 1997' AGENT: APN: 026-050-026 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: USE PERMIT (UP 97-16) Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS A. STREETS Prior to the issuance of building permits obtain encroachment permit for all new or existing driveway approaches and construct them to County standards, as specified in County Improvement Standards. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits deed to Butte County, in fee simple, feet of right-of-way from the centerline of The right of way shall be sufficient for the installation of standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits submit road and drainage improvement plans for the installation and construction of the street frontage improvements on to standard, including but not limited to P.C.C. curb, gutter and sidewalk and the required street section for parcels with gross acreage of one acre or less. Construct or install the required improvements. 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits dedicate a one foot "no access strip" or relinquish abutters rights to Butte County, along the frontage of parcels , except at approved access points. B. DRAINAGE 1 . Prior to the recordation of the issuance of building permits a plan for a permanent solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained on site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. _ 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits establish 100 year floodplain elevations and the lowest floor elevations for any structures. Show on the site plan map for building permits the elevations (by contours) and the location of an accepted NVGD benchmark and a temporary benchmark on-site. ■ Use Permit Standard Conditions - Butte County ■ Planning Division 1 FEB 0 3 1997 Oroville, California C. LEGAL LOT STATUS 1. Prior to the issuance of the Use Permit, prove, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works, that the parcel of the subject application is a legal parcel. 2 p/w� �l i c�'JJ! �� �" a.cf.�•f S' �v � a�l'CGC ! r GLGGdY� 54 �� �% i'v c%r«►-�5 Cw�j � Coe . ■ Use Permit Standard Conditions - Butte County ■ 2 r, 'AIG ,iN3Wdol3A3a aNV1 31!03 30 AD-If100 1661 £ 0 033 C13A1333H t t6 B COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Environmental Health FROM: William Farrel, Director Of Development Services RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: William R. Bisbee, UP 97-16 DATE: December 9, 1996 PLANNER: Steve Hackney We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application for completeness and , if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested. Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for a kennel for 10 does on property zoned ARMH-1(Agricultural-Residential Mobile Home, I acre parcel) located at 6850 Melvina Ave., approx. 1,700 ft. north of Messina Ave., Palermo , identified as APN 026-050-026. It is within Supervisorial District No. 1 . THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON April 24, 1997. YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN December 24 , 1996. IF NO COMMENTS OR COMMUNICATIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YOU HAVE NONE. COMMENTS (Attach additional ages if necessary): L t S ° � /� wry d 7�d v� CL 11 -JL el n x J VNFF�ir nmental Health Date: �` Y ` i 0 i9.96 j:\up\comment.wpd 10-16-95 BKH. It CONnty Center Drive 0 r0 vi1 1 0. Ca 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601. - FAX 916-538-7785 f BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: California Department of Forestry FROM: Thomas A. Parilo, Director Of Development Services _ Bi _ RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: aWilliain R sbee UP 97-16 DATE: January 7, 1997 PLANNER: Steve Hackney ` We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application Im completeness and, if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested. Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Use Permit for a kennel for 10 does on property zoned ARMH-1 ( Agricultural -Residential Mobile Home, 1 acre parcel) located on 6850 Melvina Ave., approx 1,700 ft. north of Messina Ave., Palermo, identified as APN 026-050-026. It is within Supervisorial District No. 1 . THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON April 24, 1997. YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN January 22, 1997_ IF NO COA/11&\%7S OR COMM UNICA TIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YO U HA VE NONE. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date:7- j:\up\comment.wpd 10-16-95 BKH. Planning Division 7 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538- evllle, Cautornia APPLICANT: William R. Bisbee AGENT: DATE: December 9, 1996 APN: 026-050-026 FILE M UP 97-16 PLANNER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for kennel for 10 dogs PLEASE CONTACT THE BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS 1. Construction, installation or development of structures or facilities on the parcels/lots shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, (Public Resources Code 4290), and all other applicable State and County codes, ordinances and regulations in' effect at the time of application for improvement permits. 2. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and maintained continuously thereafter. 3. Fire hydrant identification, reflector or post reflectors shall be installed acceptable to the County Fire Warden. 4. In lieu of a pressurized water system or water storage tank, payment of $200.00 per created parcel into the Battalion _ water tend fund, is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. A pressurized community water system for fire protection is required. The specific locations and fire flow requirements shall be in accordance with the Fire Department specifications and to the satisfaction of the County Fire Warden. Average required hydrant spacing _ feet, hydrant size _ inches, and residual fire flow _ gpm. Submit plans to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction of facilities. 6. In lieu of hydrant installation, payment may be made into the hydrant fund at a cost of $1.72 per lineal foot of street frontage. The estimated fee amount is $ 7. Prior to recordation of the Map or application for a building permit, the applicant shall pay the then current fee for the West Chico Fire Station Fund. Y, 8. Provide an all weather access to all structures, which is designed to carry a 40,000 pound fire apparatus at least 10 feet wide with a 15 foot vertical clearance. Revised BKH 10-9-95 j:\up\cond.up ■ Use Permit Standard Conditions - Butte County ■ 8 • BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Building Manager FROM: Thomas A. Parilo, Director Of Development Services RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: William R. Bisbee, IJ 1' 97-16 DATE: January 7, 1997 PLANNER: Steve Hackney We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application li,r completeness and , if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments trom your department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested. Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give u a call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Use Permit for a kennel for 10 dogs on property zoned AIZM14-1 ( Agricultural -Residential Mobile Home, 1 acre parcel) located on 6850 Melvina Ave., approx 1,700 It. nurth of Messina Ave.. I'alernw , identified as APN 026-050-026. It is within Supervisorial District No. I . THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE '1'1-11: (check one) X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE: ON aril 24, 1997. YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN January 22, 1997_ IF NO COMMENT,; OR COMMUNICATIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YOU HAVE NONE. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): /s JKO1 q2 Planning Division j:\up\comment.wpd 10-16-95 BKH. It JAN 15 1997 rovri e, Camornia 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785 APPLICANT: William R. Bisbee AGENT: FILE #: UP 97-16 • DATE: December 9, 1996 APN: 026-050-026 PLANNER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for kennel for 10 dogs PLEASE CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS H. BUILDING PERMITS 1. Prior to building permit issuance for a new residential dwelling unit(s), the applicant shall pay all applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time of acceptance of the application. Such fees, shall include, but not be limited to: Park Fee, School Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, and Fire Protection Fees. 2. Prior to building permit issuance for a new commercial or industrial development, or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay all applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time of acceptance of the application. Such fees shall include, but not be limited to: School Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, and Fire Protection Fees. 1. EXISTING STRUCTURES Comply with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire -resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended new use of the building(s) or the existing building(s) shall be demolished. ■ Use Permit Standard Conditions - Butte County ■ 4 . d BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Butte County Animal Control FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: William R. Bisbee, UP 97-16 DATE: February 25,1997 CONTACT PERSON: Steve Hackney The Planning Division has received an application for development of the below described property. The application is being reviewed for completeness and , if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Use Permit for a kennel for ten dogs on property zoned ARMH-1 ( Agricultural Residential Mobile Home. 1 acre parcel) located at 6850 Melvina Ave.. approx. 1,700 ft. north of Messina Ave.. Palermo, identified as APN 026-050-026. It is within Supervisorial District No. 1 . THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON April 24, 1997. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 11, 1997. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. k:\forms\comment.frm (Rev. 01-29-97 cbs) Planning Division MAR 1 9 1997 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785 • • f60 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Agricultural Commission FROM: Thomas A. Parilo, Director Of Development Services RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: William R--Bi"15ee UP 97-16 DATE: January 7, 1997 PLANNER: Steve Hackney We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application 1'01- completeness iarcompleteness and, if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments 11-0111 your department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested. Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Use Permit for a kennel for 10 does on property zoned ARM14-1 ( Aea-icultural-Residential Mobile Home, 1 acre parcel) located on 6850 Melvina Ave., approx 1,700 ft. north of Messina Ave., Palen—no, identified as APN 026-050-026. It is within Supervisorial District No. I . THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE TI -Il: (check one) X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMIT" I-+" ON April 24, 1997. YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN January 22, 1997. 1F A1O COA,1Mh'.1V S OR COMMUAWATIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT )'OU 114 1/1, NONE: COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): N o G'i'n rYt � By: e5Zb fel 1C.�'i*i�G T( l'Z—Q._ Date: _��--- -- - j:\up\comment.wpd 10-16-95 BICH. It Planning Division .IAN 15-1997 11 l �r 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 FAX 916-539-7785 r i BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: LAFCo FROM: Thomas A. Parilo, Director Of Development Services RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: ;William R Bisbee 01197-16 DATE: January 7, 1997 PLANNER: Steve Hackney' We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application tier completeness and , if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested. Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Use Permit for a kennel for 10 dogs on property zoned ARN14-1 ( Agricultural -Residential Mobile Home. 1 acre parcel) located on 6850 Melvina Ave., approx 1.700 ft. north of Messina Ave.. Palenno ,identified as APN 026-050-026. It is within Supervisorial District No. I . THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON Al2ril 24, 1997. YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN January 22, 1997_ IF NO COMMENTS OR COMMUNICATIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YOU HAVE NONE. /l.o ,a LQ -Fee Date: 1,&q/q7 j:\up\comment.wpd 10-16-95 BKH. It .funning Division AN N 2 0 9997 Orov-ille, C�alifomla 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-5321-7 85 RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC LAFCO U9E VARIANCES PUBLIC ZONING DATE PERMITS DOCUMENTS NO. RECEIVED WORKS OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING _ R,re ENV OTHER NEALTK "Y\ E.. APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM RECEIPT 15695 ISSUED BY S9 � n C c rr �. a cl 0c �.� Lo . N. r�— cr OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING _ R,re ENV OTHER NEALTK "Y\ E.. APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM RECEIPT 15695 ISSUED BY S9 0 � n C a 8 . 0 r�— cr ... .. . . . .. . . . 4- 0 'J_ AG l.. I W d, 1 PM 71- 6 5 262. 400.0 05 310.11 264 792 .N a)o 71�ly '> .t �y o v C a 3#rCP "c vLLI tb _> 26 Lu °' -k 4.82 A.C. ku a 2.73 AC ° �'�"� a1 �' straw . , xu3� 158.00 50415 �,v -�� 2 3 500 23 I'3 s 2 AC. 1.08 Ac t f g � 0 ,40 3.79AC. r6s.� 264 use Pec-M�} rror W'\\icavn 4�sbte >q N A-iplicant • Assessor's Parcel rte, , ... DATA SHEET ERD Log # A. a Project Description 1. -Type of Project: 2. Brief Description: 3. Location: 4. ' Proposed Density of Development: 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: 8... Source of Water Supply: 9. Proximity of Power Lines: 10. Potential for further land divisions and development: B. Environmental Setting Physical Environment: 1. Terrain a...General Topographic Character: b. Slopes: c. Elevation: 7 d. Limiting Factors: 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics : l. L r � 4 grrKd�W` S�M7G�1�1%��'t b. Limiting 'actors: 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zone: Iyo b. Erosion Potential:rA c. Landslide Potential: 4. Hydrology a. Surf ace Water: d. Fire Hazard:(. ueri�.,il.e, o e. Expansive Soil Potential: 114 Apvendix F (a) Data Sheet continued b.. Ground Water: c. Drainage Characteristics d.. Annual Rainfall (normal) : e. Limiting Factors: 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: 6. Acoustic Quality: 7. Air Quality: Biological Environment: 8. Vegetation: 9. Wildlife Habitat: Cultural Environment: 10. Archaeological andhistorical Resources in the area: 1 11. Butte County General Plan designation: 12. Existing Zoning: --r 13. Existing Land Use on-site: 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: t'UA u& -C^LwAkt b. Zoning: c. Gen. Plan designations: d. Parcel Sizes: e. Population: 15. Character of Site and Area: 16. Nearest Urban Area: 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: 18. Improvements Standards Urban Area: 19. Fire Protection.Service: a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: "d b. Water Availability? 20. Schools in Area: �tlQy"w,1h lXJ►An Appendix F (b -44 5 X. SE ya O ID 0 M kL L� .f,, o 2 �. OAC 400.01 �tv 26.E"Or, cn 1W CL T")�� 2.73 AC � 500 t 08 Ac 8 3.79AC. 28 N 3.11Ac 22 0 A9 A `1. 310,11 T19M Z. 66•:. 347-11 32 4s 2.52Ac V !2 20 o 4.82 Ac 158D0 13 2 AC. 264 1 s® o - .! h 4 2 0.8 Ac m M XMI +•�� 2.98Ac ,. Q ! 355.94 IO Aa 370.00 ;gp .5Ac ,sAt 2 Planning Division PM 79- T62 -PM 71- 65 1 262.05 792ub Q3�fr �Lu ,Q Z. 66•:. 347-11 32 4s 2.52Ac V !2 20 o 4.82 Ac 158D0 13 2 AC. 264 1 s® o - .! h 4 2 0.8 Ac m M XMI +•�� 2.98Ac ,. Q ! 355.94 IO Aa 370.00 ;gp .5Ac ,sAt 2 Planning Division 1� �r —_^.. �a1►d^ �i?'.D11� TR ;. _�1��� 11�.�i._� I.ISKRAEG 10 . ISKRAE. MD.6. f1M. 0 4 TRACT 'bt ADVENTIST TRACT M.O. R. OK.,9 PG. 34 NOTE -ASSESSOR'S PARCEL. BLOCK a l (7T Nf j"ArDc 0-15 ZONr, IN GOk.P. Tax Ano Cods -92-00 92-07 o-0_ I� 26-06 z�05 o eOAIEANA 10 AVE. Assessor's Map No. 26-05 County of Butte. Calif