The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutUP 98-12PROJECT SUMMARY SHEI FILE #: UP. 98-12 PROJECT TYPE: Use Permit APPLICANT: Cathy and Harry Webster ADDRESS: 725 Eaton Rd., Chico, CA 95973 OWNER: Carmon A. Michael ADDRESS: 116 Tuscaloosa Ave.. Atherton, CA 94027 REPRESENTATIVE: ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business PROPERTY ZONED: SR LOCATED: on the south side of Eaton Road. approximately 600 ft. west of Morseman Ave.. at 725 Eaton Road AP#: 007-210-060 TOWN/AREA: Chico GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential 1. 2. 3. 4. 7 Application complete: November 3. 1997 Amount: $1018.00 Receipt #: 16101 Comments sent to: LAFCO. EH. DEV. SERV., P.W.. BUILDING, CHICO, AG COMM.. CDF Comments received from: Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: Assigned To: Steve Hackney Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No: Subject to Fish & Game: Categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. -CEQA # 15061.(bx3) Other 8. Staff Report: Project Video: 9. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: 10. Publication Notice ��Wiiritten: 3- 3 1' %t'K Display Ad Prepared: 11. Notices Mailed: T" "/— %O Number of Notices: 12. Newspaper Publication Date: 3 — / 0 06 13. Planning Commission Hearing(s): jr(a,-9 Q k 1''►' __ Action taken: Special Conditions: Commission Resolution No. _ 14 Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: 15. Type Use Permit/Send for signature: 16. N.O.E. / N.O.D. / APPENDIX G: Fish & Game Fees Paid: Yes No 17. Send validated Use Permit: M AY 15 1998 MAY 1 5 ►�y� 18. Assessor's Memo: ` MAY 1 5 F*6 19. Copy of Use Permit / Variance to Planning Technician: Cathy and Harry Webster - proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding environmental impacts and Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business on property zoned S -R (Suburban Residential) located on the south side of Eatori Road, approximately 600 feet west of Morseman Avenue, at 725 Eaton road, identified as AP 007'-210-060, Chico. (SH) (UP98- 12) (VIDEO) Stephen Hackney summarized the Agenda Report. The concerns for drainage and light and glare will be addressed by conditions and mitigations. Chairman Lambert noted that a letter was received from John and Sheryl Russell which included a request for reversal of Phases 2 and 3. Coni nissioner Mooney noted that Condition 8, to bring existing buildings up to current Building and Zoning regulations, should only apply to those buildings which are subject to a changed use. There was consensus that Condition 8 should apply to buildings subject to a changed use and that the standard condition should be modified for clarification. There was a discussion of setbacks for the buildings. Mr. Sanders said the setback for the zone is 5 feet from the rear and side property lines. Commissioner Nelson said the reason the Russell's would like Phases 2 and 3 reversed is simply to retain their view for as long as possible. The Russell's do not object to the project. The Russell's are also concerned about drainage. They are also concerned about fencing, lighting and security. Mr. Hackney said the property is surrounded by fencing and there is a caretaker on site as well as the applicants living on site. There is a condition to address lighting. Condition 11 addresses drainage. Commissioner Cage asked about plans to widen Eaton Road at this location. Mr. Sanders said widening of Eaton Road is a long range plan of Butte County although a 4 lane road may not be feasible at this location. Widening would not be in the near future. HEARING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC Cathy and Harry Webster were present. Ms. Webster said the drainage ditches do fill up but there has not been a problem with flooding. An engineer will have to address the drainage condition. She asked what a landscape and irrigation plan would entail. Mr. Sanders said 5% of the site is recommended for landscaping and a landscaping plan can be drawn by the applicants without hiring a professional landscaper. Ms. Webster thought 40 feet of right-of-way has already been deeded to Butte County. Mr. Sanders said the condition may have already been met. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 23, 1998 Ms. Webster asked if the street improvements required by Condition 10 could be postponed until the other properties on Eaton Road construct those improvements. Commissioner Mooney said that street improvements and storm drainage should be handled over a large area at the same time, rather than in a piecemeal fashion. He suggested applying for a covenant for street improvements. Commissioner Leland recommended that the Planning Commission make it clear that street improvements could be postponed until the neighboring properties are improved similarly. Commissioner Mooney said it does not make sense to require preparation of plans for street improvements that may be installed much later. There was discussion of the language of Condition 10 in that it requires plans but not actual construction. Mr. Sanders said the condition was not correctly transcribed from the recommended Public Works condition, which did ask for construction as well as plans. Mr. Hackney said covenants have been granted on other projects in similar circumstances. Chairman Lambert suggested that the various plans should be co-ordinated by the Public Works Department. Mr. Sanders suggested having a Workshop with someone from the Public Works Department regarding street improvements and covenants. There was consensus that a Workshop is an excellent idea. Commissioner Leland suggested a covenant running with the land for street improvements. Commissioner Mooney noted that improvements for a 4 lane road standard would be inappropriate if the road remains a 2 lane road. He was in favor of a covenant. There was a suggestion for bonding the improvements, which was rejected, since a bond might get lost and would tie up the applicants' money. Mr. Webster asked if they could use a drainage easement which goes out to Highway 99. Mr. Nelson said it would be necessary to work with the Public Works Department on meeting the drainage condition. Commissioner Nelson read the letter from the Russell's regarding their concerns about reversing the phases to retain their view, drainage, and fencing for privacy and security. He suggested working with the neighbors. HEARING CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC There was discussion of fencing but no changes were made in the conditions. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 23, 1998 l Mr. Hackney said the property is fenced with variations in kind, quality and height. The applicants will be removing all outdoor storage of vehicles although there is no condition to prohibit outdoor storage. There was a discussion of fire protection and it was noted that there are fire hydrants and a fire station nearby. It was moved by Commissioner Leland, seconded by Commissioner Mooney, and carried unanimously to approve the Use Permit 98-12 for Cathy and Harry Webster subject to the findings and conditions of Exhibit A of the Agenda Report dated April 2, 1998, including modification of Condition 8 to insert a clause after "existing building" to state "which are subject to a changed use," and modification of Condition 10 to delete the first clause "prior to issuance of building permits," and replace that wording with "Execute and record against the property a covenant running with the land requiring the landowners to" and to add to end of the condition, "when neighboring properties are similarly improved." Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: Cathy & Harry Webster is hereby granted a Use Permit in accordance with application filed on November 3, 1997, for a Use Permit for the expansion of a mini -storage. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24- 45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Use Permit, all conditions must be completed prior to, or concurrently with, the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 24 months of the delivery of the countersigned permit to the Permittee. 3. If any use for which a use permit has been granted is not established within two year of the date of receipt of the countersigned permit by the Permittee, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. 4. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. Approval of this permit shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable State and County laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit application. 6. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. Section 1: Environmental Findings. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 23, 1998 A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act identifying potentially significant environmental effects that the project may have. Provisions and the design of the project and the conditions added to the project will mitigate such effects to a level of insignificance; and I B. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a de minimus exemption to the collection of Department of Fish and Game Environmental Filing Fees is recommended; and C. The Planning Commission has independently reviewed, analyzed, and considered the proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures prior to making its decision on the project, and the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement of Butte County; and Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed use of the property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with, or injurious to, surrounding property, or detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood, or to the general health, welfare and safety of the County because: 1. The mini -storage expansion will incorporate a number of building design features to provide modern facilities which meet current building codes while replacing some aged facilities; and 2. The use does not represent a change from the historical use of the site which has existed compatibly with adjoining residential properties for approximately 40 years; and The hours of operation are compatible with adjoining uses and security lighting will be conditioned to minimize impacts to adjoining residences; and 4. The nature of the use generates little noise or traffic and the operations are spread out over the entire operating day resulting in no particular time of peak activity that could disrupt neighboring residences; and Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings in Sections 1 and 2 of this Exhibit move to approve the Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster APN 007-210-060 to allow the replacement and expansion of mini -storage facilities. Approval shall be subject to the following conditions: B. Conditions of Approval: Mitigation Measures: All outside lighting fixtures shall utilize "low spillover" design where all direct lighting shall remain on-site, allowing only reflective lighting to spillover into those areas off-site. or BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 23, 1998 2. During construction, should any archaeological artifacts be discovered, the Planning Division shall be notified immediately, and all work shall cease until a qualified archaeologist has examined the artifacts and the site and submitted his or her findings to the Planning Division, and recommended clearance to continue. Recommencement of construction shall be upon the approval of the Planning Division." Planning Division Conditions: 3. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan consistent with the project site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. Building Division. 5. Prior to building permit issuance for a new conunercial or industrial development, or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay all applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time of acceptance of the application. Such fees shall include, but not be limited to: School Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, and Fire Protection Fees. 6. Obtain required building permits. Plans shall be prepared by a design professional licensed or registered to practice in the State of California. 7. Comply with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. 8. Existing building(s) which are subject to a changed use shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended new use of the building(s) or the existing building(s) shall be demolished. Public Works Conditions: 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits deed to Butte County, in fee simple, 40 feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Eaton Road. The right-of-way shall be sufficient for the installation of standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. 10. Execute and record against the property a covenant running with the land requiring the landowner to submit road and drainage improvement plans and construct street frontage improvements on Eaton Road to an RS -14 lane standard, including, but not limited to, P.C.C. curb, gutter and sidewalk and the required street section, when neighboring properties are similarly improved. Prior to the recordation of the issuance of building permits a plan for a permanent solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained or retained on-site and or conveyed to the nearest BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 23, 1998 natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. Environmental Health Conditions: 12. Prior to issuance of building permits for Phase II, the applicant shall complete work for the abandonment of well and septic tanks as per Environmental Health requirements. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 23, 1998 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commission FROM: Development Services Department DATE: April 2, 1998 REQUEST: Use Permit UP 98-12 for Cathy and Harry Webster: A request for a Use Permit for an expansion of a mini storage business on property zoned SR (Suburban Residential) located on the south side of Eaton Road, approximately 600 ft. west of Morseman Ave., at 725 Eaton Road, Chico, identified as APN 007-210-060, with a General Plan designation of Low Density Residential. This project is located in Supervisorial District 3. RELATED ITEMS: None FOR: Planning Commission Meeting of April 23, 1998 SUMMARY: This application is for a Use Permit to provide for the replacement and expansion of mini storage facilities. The use is a pre-existing nonconforming use that pre -dates the zoning classification. The Zoning Code provides for the expansion and reconstruction of such uses when they will not conflict with, impair, or be detrimental to the uses of the zone in which it is located. Staff recommends approval with conditions and findings contained in this report. APPLICABLE BUTTE COUNTY REGULATIONS: This Use Permit application is submitted pursuant to Butte County Code Sections: 24-45 (Use Permits) which requires that an application be submitted and a public hearing be held by the Planning Commission. The Commission may grant a use permit when it finds that the proposed use of the property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with, or injurious to, surrounding properties or detrimental to the health or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or to the general health, safety and welfare of the residents of the county; and 24-35.20 (Change or Expansion of Nonconforming Use) which provides for the expansion of a nonconforming use upon obtaining a Use Permit from the Planning Commission. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS: The property consists of 3.65 acres developed with a number of existing structures besides the mini storage facilities: a double -wide mobile home for the managers located at the south end of the property, a single -wide mobile home for the caretaker at the northern end of the property, three wells, two septic systems, and two propane tanks servicing the residences. The project is located in the northern urban area of Chico, on the south side of Eaton ,i BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION :' AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 1 '_' Road, half way between Godman Avenue and Morseman Avenue. The property site is zoned SR (Suburban Residential), and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density Residential. Elevation on the property is approximately 220 feet. The site topography is characterized by level terrain - 0% to 2% slope. The vegetation on-site is limited to a number of trees in the northwest corner of the property, and an assortment of shrubs, trees and plants around the manager's residence. The soil consists of Vina Clay Loam Adobe, which is characterized as retaining water well, but having slow infiltration. Access to the site is provided from Eaton Road, at one point, on the property's north boundary. Surrounding land uses include a mixture of agricultural uses of both row crops and orchards on the north and south, rural residential development on the east and west, with urban residential development located several parcels removed to the south and southwest. The proposed expansion of the mini storage will consist of three phases: Phase I. Replace 22 existing storage boxes in a deteriorated state, covering 1,376 sq. ft, with two buildings totaling 2,100 sq. ft. One building will contain 12 storage units, 10'X25'. The second building will contain 3 storage units, 10'X10'. Construction is proposed for 1998. Phase II. Construct three buildings each sized at 80'X30' for a total of 7,200 sq. ft. The buildings are to be located on the undeveloped portion in the northwest corner of the property. Each building will contain 8 units, each 10'X20', and 16 units, each 5'X10'. Construction is proposed for 1999- 2000. Phase III. Construct one building sized at 120'X35', covering 8,400 sq. ft., on the undeveloped west side of the property. The building will contain 12 units, each 10'X15', and 12 units, each 10'X20'. Construction is proposed for 2001-2002. Neither the zoning or land use designation make provision for a mini storage use, however, the current facilities constitute a pre-existing nonconforming use. ANALYSIS: The existing mini -storage facility is a pre-existing nonconforming use in the zone. The assortment of buildings on-site were constructed at various dates, but the earliest mini storage use dates back over 40 years ago, predating the zoning classification of SR by approximately 20 to 25 years. Section 24-35.20 of the Butte County Code provides for the change or expansion of nonconforming as long as such uses will not conflict with, impair or be detrimental to the uses permitted and conditional in that zone, and a Use Permit is obtained. Although the mini storage use is not consistent with the zoning and land use designation, the use is not determined to constitute a significant impact in terms of compatibility with existing land uses in the vicinity. The commercial use of this property dates back to approximately 1960, with additional mini storage facilities added in 1965, 1972, and 1975 (pers comm. Al Petersen, Assessor's Office, February 11, 1998). The property was zoned A-2 during this time period. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT PAGE 2 • The earlier surrounding land uses were probably dominated by agricultural activities. A recent site visit and aerial photo show the project site to be bordered on two sides by agricultural land used for row crops and orchards. Over the intervening years, residential development has progressed in the vicinity of the project site so that currently there is a mixture of rural and urban density residential development as well as continued agricultural activities. The uses of the site have apparently been compatible with the neighbors over a period of approximately 38 years. As the area continues to become more urbanized and have more residents this use will still remain compatible with the area. The mini storage will serve residents of the neighborhood without causing undue noise, traffic congestion, light or glare. The hours of operation will also be compatible with residential uses. Staff identified several concerns/issues. These concerns included drainage, and light & glare. Drainage. The expansion of additional storage facilities with associated paving will increase runoff from the site. The property is within the Shasta Union Drainage Assessment District and part of the drainage system is located on-site along the western border of the property. The system was installed in 1964: At that time the property site consisted of only one storage facility and a single family residence. The contract engineer for the assessment district attributed the site with a residential classification for purposes of calculating runoff and capacity figures for the system. The drainage system may not be adequately sized to meet any increased runoff resulting from additional impervious coverages on the property. The Department of Public Works is requiring, as a condition of approval, that the site be re-examined by an engineer and a drainage plan prepared which will address the issue. This condition will adequately address any potentially significant impacts. Light & Glare. The mini storage will not be open to the public at night. The applicant has stated no new lights will be necessary for this expansion. Currently, there are security lights in the area of the gate and elsewhere on-site. However, in the event the applicant may want to place additional lights on the expanded facilities, for security reasons or otherwise, and because of the potential for future parcel development on neighboring properties, an appropriate mitigation measure should be recommended to address any future potential impacts. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: This application has been defined as a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and as such, is subject to the requirements of CEQA. Based upon the review of the Initial Study, staff has determined there are no potentially significant environmental impacts resulting from this project after appropriate mitigation measures have been implemented. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the Planning Commission approve the application for Cathy and Harry Webster on APN 007-210-060, subject to the findings and conditions in attached Exhibit "A." Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Findings Vicinity Map Project and Surrounding Area BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) UP 98-12 PERMIT NO.'. 007-210-060 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: Cathy & Harry Webster is hereby granted a Use Permit in accordance with application filed on November 3, 1997, for a Use Permit for the expansion of a mini -storage. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Use Permit, all conditions must be completed prior to, or concurrently with, the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 24 months of the delivery of the countersigned permit to the Permittee. If any use for which a use permit has been granted is not established within two year of the date of receipt of the countersigned permit by the Permittee, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. 4. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 5. Approval of this permit shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable State and County laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit application. 6. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. D BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION L AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 4 C • Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act 'identifying potentially significant environmental effects that the project may have. Provisions and the design of the project and the conditions added to the project will mitigate such effects to a level of insignificance; and B. The design of the proposed project improvementswill not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a de minimus exemption to the collection of Department of Fish and Game Environmental Filing Fees is recommended; and C. The Planning Commission has independently reviewed, analyzed, and considered the proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures prior to making its decision on the project, and the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement of Butte County; and Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed use of the property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with, or injurious to, surrounding property, or detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood, or to the general health, welfare and safety of the County because: The mini -storage expansion will incorporate a number of building design features to provide modern facilities which meet current building codes while replacing some aged facilities; and 2. The use does not represent a change from the historical use of the site which has existed compatibly with adjoining residential properties for approximately 40 years; and 3. The hours of operation are compatible with adjoining uses and security lighting will be conditioned to minimize impacts to adjoining residences; and 4. The nature of the use generates little noise or traffic and the operations are spread out over the entire operating day resulting in no particular time of peak activity that could disrupt neighboring residences; and Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings in Sections 1 and 2 of this Exhibit move to approve the Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster APN 007-210-060 to allow the replacement and expansion of mini -storage facilities. Approval shall be subject to the following conditions: BUTTE, COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT 2 PAGE 5 rE B. Conditions of Approval: Mitigation Measures: 1. All outside lighting fixtures shall utilize "low spillover" design where all direct lighting shall remain on-site, allowing only reflective lighting to spillover into those areas off-site. 2. During construction, should any archaeological artifacts be discovered, the Planning Division shall be notified immediately, and all work shall, cease until a qualified archaeologist has examined the artifacts and the site and submitted his or her findings to the Planning Division, and recommended clearance to continue. Recommencement of construction shall be upon the approval of the Planning Division." Planning Division Conditions: A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, consistent with the project site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. Building Division. 5. Prior to building permit issuance for a new commercial or industrial development, or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay all applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time of acceptance of the application.. Such fees shall include, but not be limited to: School Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, and Fire Protection Fees. 6. Obtain required building permits. Plans shall be prepared by a design professional licensed or registered to practice in the State of California. 7. Comply with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire-resistivenessof existing buildings. W61, owt -Iw�04 �Qa cA6A 8. Existing building(s4 shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended new use of the building(s) or the existing building(s) shall be demolished. Public Works Conditions: 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits deed to Butte County, in fee simple, 40 feet of right- of-way from the centerline of Eaton Road. The right-of-way shall be sufficient for the installation of standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 6 0 W OH T-44 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits submit road and drainage improvement plans for the installation and construction of the street frontage improvements on Eaton Road to RS' I-4 lane standard, including, but not limited to, P.C.C. curb, gutter and sidewalk and the required street section. 11. Prior to the recordation of the issuance of building permits a plan for a permanent solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained or retained on-site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. Environmental Health Conditions: 12. Prior to issuance of building permits for Phase II, the applicant shall complete work for the .abandonment of well and septic tanks as per Environmental Health requirements. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County P1arming Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Health Department California Department of Forestry BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 7 0 Vicinitynilty Map P Chico Airport UP 98-12 APN 007-210-060 jec Location WEBSTER Fol r®v�� of Chico M-2 I t Location R-1 I R-2 R-3 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMNUSSION Applicant: Cathy & Harry Webster Owner: Carmon A. Michael Hearing Date: April 23, 1998 @ 9:00 am. Existing Zone: S -R w 1 Request: Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business. No � VScale Assessor Parcel No: 007-210-060 File: 98-12 DEPARTSENT OF DEVELOPMONT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION ArrLIUAN 1: Agent information to he provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME ( If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required 1 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 00/0,e /lAfel2 .00 z/0 - 060- ooc ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE: FIE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) J)-5 EATOAl R- . l <U 5 73 v P NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT ( If any 1 TELEPHONE LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross streets and Address, if any ) Q DJZ61�5 49 VF- CROSS bl-0 4V -4 M X S A7 4A/ :. ._ GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED OWNER'S NAME CA lbr v/J .4/►,� lc1-1,4,el _ ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP TELEPHONE I ya Sas /3T ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE: 7-615C 4eaOSAO • A C r p9 ZONE GENERALELAN �,� fl �l EXISTING LAND USE � F S'Foim'it� ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION SITE SIZE (in Square Feet or Aeras ) 3, SOS aa -e --f EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) S9 i2e /��a��s 1� 76 , {t Yr1 �v, Dbt,.vt4L PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) Z) / 130 SJ -0-- j- _ ta�.� PHASF In I (Check One) (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER l�PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ REZONE USE PERMIT ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT ❑ VARIANCE ❑ MINOR VARIANCE ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPLICATION REQUESTED . 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division , describe the number and size of parcels.) 22 5j0,fziglj E S $®)(ES Ct7/j'f71 Z 1�G1 /G D/ql S OtiF- «,v,—AJ-Al",rl l2 - i0' res' Sr02.g67E 1i -VI 7y f y Or!•/r' CU,tr-A/N/N 3 /D'x/ 0' tlN/1S PNA o5 Z7 L l -" �D X 3 0 3 (411, !)IA16, t 0A/ b NJEI/rG0/'1—z-/ ,W - ,/iIW AVX l79l)YR-11 , EgcH 1312)6. 7-0 CON, 41A1 /0'x Zv ` Ut AI17S 0 /( 5- /v / 14A07 y6—)0,v C_t'a'Ve-12F"1-FOai N,JA-1-) dA1S 6,P01'1tiJ To de- /9A Ufa . 3 S- � �3�r i�d/�v aN oNt)E"Ila- o1rU wa S/O c 0'4=� OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.) DATE: ��ZS_ y SIGNATURE;,�r''� Q , 1 4 IT� ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP Planning Division r-3TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP NOV 0 3 1997 ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION California ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION Oroville, ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division , describe the number and size of parcels.) 22 5j0,fziglj E S $®)(ES Ct7/j'f71 Z 1�G1 /G D/ql S OtiF- «,v,—AJ-Al",rl l2 - i0' res' Sr02.g67E 1i -VI 7y f y Or!•/r' CU,tr-A/N/N 3 /D'x/ 0' tlN/1S PNA o5 Z7 L l -" �D X 3 0 3 (411, !)IA16, t 0A/ b NJEI/rG0/'1—z-/ ,W - ,/iIW AVX l79l)YR-11 , EgcH 1312)6. 7-0 CON, 41A1 /0'x Zv ` Ut AI17S 0 /( 5- /v / 14A07 y6—)0,v C_t'a'Ve-12F"1-FOai N,JA-1-) dA1S 6,P01'1tiJ To de- /9A Ufa . 3 S- � �3�r i�d/�v aN oNt)E"Ila- o1rU wa S/O c 0'4=� OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.) DATE: ��ZS_ y SIGNATURE;,�r''� Q , 1 4 IT� AWENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; CAT// / 41volod? N422N Wrl Print Name of Agent and Phone Number I 7.2 s' 6-A7-L/)N CA,C0. C1 X5973 Mailing Address is hereby.authorized to process this applicatio for: L2hrZ /12, 12600fbl2 61± on my property, identified as Buttc County Assessor Parccl Numbcr: �90% —a'0 OCoO—/�Oli This Authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) -,(, �',1�yZ t a �y+, 1y1 I c is Print Natbe r x. Signature Architect and/or Engineer: Print Name of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number Mailing Address c o Current fee for this application is $ ©�I as of Make check payable to `Butte County reasurer". Payment o: the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Taken by Date Received: Total Amount Received: Planning E.H. Land Dev. AP Number(s) . _ Owners Authorization _ Project Description IL Receipt No. Fire Dept. Legal Description Zoning Requirements Copies of Plot Plan COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed General Information: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or project sponsor: CACM7 d4/ A IhICNAE4 ///, T/iSC,4 &00&A AVF • A TNc2Td NT GA 94.017 2. Address of project: 7�)-s EA i ON 9i) . c'fvy(O CA 95573 Assessor's Parcel Number: 007 — 0 — 060 — 000 I 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: C A rHV A1vv/a2 N a22, -f WC -S 5TF2 — 7,) Y- &'47 0A1 R6 J Uq/Ca -4 ?S9 73 '(7/b ) S'f J - d -7-1b 4. List and descnbe'any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: IA5E11G2ALtT' F412 N0kLCdAJr--?)2/IAj 5. Existing general plan design 6. Existing zoning district: SR 7. How is land currently used? ST02R66r FAC14 /Tt/ 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): EXffily OF 2�4S,eff N,5W co -d 7e&crji7d Pkk =: ivo, Project Description: 9. Site size: 2 ' � S---, cres/ q. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yesx_ No _ 12. Proposed development schedule ?1445E,.L: = H9 7— 9$ PNgsE IIL : 0 oft, a�- 13. Associated projects 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development se& #/eZ Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. Planning Division NOV 0 3 W/ ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division Oroville, California i MFA/7— 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit TM Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). 29. Substantial change in demand formunicipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). _ 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. Manning 1)"sion NoV � s -►��r Galltornia 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division O 2 YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. _ 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _ 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels ✓ in the vicinity. 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand formunicipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). _ 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. Manning 1)"sion NoV � s -►��r Galltornia 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division O 2 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it.exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and coOX rect to the best my knowledge and belief. tt'4'� t -h Date D a� Signature for . K:\FORMS\SUBMITTAL\ENV-INFO Planning Division N O V 0 3 1997 ®roville, California . 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division ❑ 3 PROJECT PLAN FOR ANCHOR INN STORAGE THE EXISTING USE OF THIS PROPERTY AT 725 EATON ROAD HAS BEEN AN OPERATING MINI SELF STORAGE FACILITY SINCE APPROXIMATELY 1966. AS CHICO'S GROWTH IN THE LAST 10 YEARS HAS INCREASED SO HAS THE DEMAND FOR STORAGE UNITS. ALL MINI STORAGES IN THE GREATER CHICO AREA ARE ORIENTED TO THE WHOLE AREA. SINCE THE AIRPORT IS SEEKING TO ESTABLISH A TRADE ZONE, AND THIS FACILITY IS LOCATED WITHIN 3 MILES OF THE AIRPORT, IT IS LIKELY THAT THE DEMAND FOR STORAGE UNITS WILL CONTINUE. CURRENTLY, ON THE PROPERTY EXISTING STORAGE STRUCTURES UTILIZE 22,496 SQUARE FEET. THE IMPROVEMENT PLAN IS AS FOLLOWS: PHASE I: REPLACE EXISTING 22 STORAGE BOXES (1,376 SQ, FT.) IN DETERIORATED STATE WITH 2 BUILDINGS (TOTAL 2,100 SQ. FT.). ONE BUILDING WILL CONTAIN 12 STORAGE UNITS, 10'X25; THE OTHER 3 UNITS 10'X10'. THIS CONSTRUCTION IS PLANNED FOR 1997 OR EARLY 1998 (IMMEDIATELY). PHASE II: CONSTRUCT 3 NEW BUILDINGS EACH 80'X30'(7,200 SQ.FT.) ON UNDEVELOPED NW CORNER OF PROPERTY. THESE BLDGS. WILL CONTAIN 8 UNITS (10'X20') AND 16 UNITS (5'X10'). THIS CONSTRUCTION IS PLANNED FOR 1999-2000. PHASE III: CONSTRUCT ONE NEW BUILDING 120'X35'(8,400 SQ.FT.) ON UNDEVELOPED WEST SIDE OF PROPERTY. THE BLDG. WILL CONTAIN 12 UNITS (10'X15') AND 12 UNITS (10'X20'). THIS SECTION IS CURRENTLY USED TO STORE RECREATIONAL VEHICLES AND OTHER VEHICLES. THE CONSTRUCTION IS PLANNED FOR 2001-2002. THE CONFIGURATION OF UNIT SIZE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE IN PHASES II & III. ALL BUILDINGS WILL BE SET ON CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS. DRIVEWAYS WILL BE PAVED. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED S -R (BUTTE COUNTY) SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL. THIS BUSINESS EXERCISES A LEGAL NON -CONFORMING USE THAT PREDATES THE ZONING. WE ARE REQUIRED TO APPPLY FOR A USE PERMIT IN ORDER TO CONTINUE THIS USE WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION. REGARDING HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILITY: 89 EXISTING UNITS ARE H.A. NEW BUILDINGS ARE PLANNED TO BE 4 INCHES OFF THE GROUND TO PREVENT WATER LEAKAGE DURING RAIN. A SLOPE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ON 10% OF NEW UNITS IF REQUIRED. PARKING AT THE FACILITY IS ANTICIPATED 99% OF THE TIME FOR LOADING ONLY FROM OR TO AN INDIVIDUAL UNIT. THE AMPLE ROOM IN FRONT OF EACH UNIT IS CONSIDERED TO BE THE PARKING SPACE FOR EACH TENANT. THE ONLY DESIGNATED PER SE PARKING SPACES ARE THOSE THAT ARE CURRENTLY RENTED OUT ON A MONTHLY BASIS FOR VEHICLE STORAGE. WE ARE CONSIDERING ELIMINATING VEHICLE IN THE FUTURE. Planning ®ivision NOV C 3 1997 Oroville, California 0 PROPERTY. THIS BUILDING WILL CONTAIN 12 STORAGE UNITS 10'X15'& 12 UNITS 10'X20'. ALL BUILDINGS WILL BE SET ON CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS. GROUND WILL BE PAVED. REGARDING HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILITY: 89 EXISTING UNITS ARE H.A. NEW BUILDINGS ARE PLANNED TO BE 4" OFF THE GROUND TO PREVENT WATER LEAKAGE DURING RAIN. A SLOPE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ON 10% OF NEW UNITS IF REQUIRED. PROPOSED DATES OF COMPLETION FOR PROJECT PHASES: PHASE I: 1997-98 PHASE II: 1999-2000 PHASE III: 2001-02 Planning Division NOV 0 3 1997 ®rovilie, California • ` + � it v ..r. ' —. Fh: t � ,•., a� � 2-10 D ®3 Up c I� vi pi. a� p _ n�Q� j -F QM L.i �A1� -A P. — III vJ DO T IE (D,��.�,, ---- - i t i12 s --r" i EL: 007 210 060 000 STATUS: AC MICHAEL CARMON A TRUST ETAL WAMBAUGH DIANE 4313 LA COSA AVE FREMONT CA 94536 EL: 007 020 123 000 STATUS: AC WEBB'"MERLE A & SONS 121 YELLOWSTONE DR CHICO CA 95973-5811 EL: 007 210 007 000 STATUS: AC RUSSELL JOHN E & SHERYL D 695 EATON RD CHICO CA 95973 EL: 007 210 025 000 STATUS: AC SHERWOOD WILLIAM & SANDRA 3119 HORSEMAN AVE CHICO CA 95973 EL: 007 210 0227 000 STATUS: AC CURTIS JAMES R & NANCY 3143 HORSEMAN AVE CHICO CA 95973 EL: 007 210 034 000 STATUS: AC FIELD CHARLES W & SHIRLEY L 3122 GODMAN AVE CHICO CA 95973 ELi 007 210 038 000 STATUS: AC MADISON FAMILY TRUST MADISON ROBERT TRUSTEE 1621 CITRUS AVENUE CHICO CA 95926 EL: 007 210 040 S%fS% 0 STATUS: AC JAEKEL JOHN 3166 GODMAN AVE CHICO CA 95973 EL: 007 210 045 tat% 0 STATUS: AC WADLINGTON ROBERT L LIVING TRUST WADLING ROBERT L TRUSTEE 751 EATON RD CHICO CA 95973 EL : 007 210 046 s%ss% 0 STATUS: AC SWEET LLOYD D & DOROTHY J 685 EATON RD CHICO CA 95973 EL; 007 210 048 t%fS% 0 STATUS; -Ac FORMAN DAN J & HELEN F_ 3094 GODMAN AVE CHICO CA 95973 EL: 00 7 210 049 S%SS% 0 STATUS: AC HARDESTY GUY & LAURF_NA I 3227 MORSEMAN AVE CHICO CA 95973 EL: 007 210 Sc 053 s%ss% 0 STATUS:' AC SWEET DAVID E & KATHLEEN E 675 EATON RD CHICO CA 95973 EL; 007 210 059 S%Ssi 0 STATUS : AC WATTENBERG STEPHAN R & BETH P, 3142 GODMAN AVE i CHICO CA 95973 1 EL.: 007 370 019 S%fS% 0 STATUS : AC WEBER PAUL J & GLENYS 3017 SAND I DR CHICO CA 95073 EL: 007 7 370 EJ20 000 STATUSPAC AC BOWMAN FAMILY TRUST ` BOWMAN DAVID J & LORRIANE R TRUST 3019 SAND I DR . ( CHICO CA 95973 EL: 007 370 021 000 STATUS: AC HURST GARY R & HELMI 3021 SAND I DR CHICO CA 95973 EL.: 007 370 022 000 STATUS:AC MILLS ANITA P 3023 SAND I DR CHICO CA 95973 g gl. ti j J� tip, 1` 'r. � �� 'C� -P� . ; a y� , � i3.•., Ito, •l •a.r . Ill jl?rim. y ..M..T�•�'\ f.1,. '�•� ��.Y� i122{ _ 14` _ \• •' r IN �+V. � ±�: � C� odp•t `+, � ti � X1°3•• I il ON, AV! 1 OJI-7- A I ------ Fig . rp.a. Agx iT RimVR I _7 4 0 A!b I jr ar Tit, L 72! Eaton Rd ,Chico AP# 007-210-060 Page 4 03 -08 -OS gb �e it fit 4 1 t 4 tIA ' �• y, �'' A r •l �j: ��L. b Jr �Yi 4. ♦ce n * p3 � e �.'�:+ �.. _ . s "a , � • • • e e ice. � � •'se.c. e AP# 007-210-060 Page 4 03 -08 -OS gb r M C i 1 orf f lea •ice .� 1 � •. a � Ali ,� � �'. a'�; � � � I ' � • � �r�,-� . 7 .i earl yC P .a .f ~ �1'S.M'��-.` ice,• ...rr., I, �� r rlid 11, ,a jI , � IF -01 �r1- r Y Page 1 of 1 Christopher, Yvonne From: Houx, Mary Anne Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 2:44 PM To: Christopher, Yvonne Cc: Wannenmacher, Felix Subject: John Russell - 695 Eaton Road Yvonne, The trouble Mr. and Mrs. Russell are having with Anchor Storage has been going on since June. They initially were working with Joe Baker and got nowhere. Felix was good enough to write a lawyerly letter to the owner of Anchor Storage as they were holding garage/estate sales at all sorts of disrupting times. The Russells live immediately next door. Apparently when the permit was issue some years ago (Craig Sanders) the storage facility was permitted to build right up to the boundary line between the storage and the Russells. What Mr. Russell wants is a fence between his property and the Anchor Inn. He feels the county owes him that. I have further suggested that there also be landscaping. A Mr. Weinroth is the owner of Anchor Storage. 'A Mr. Andy Wood was the builder. His firm is apparently North Valley Building Systems. His phone is 345-7296. John Russell'[s phone number is 342-6692. He and Mrs. R7ussell have lived at the 895 Eaton Road address for 34 years. Your immediate attention would be highly appreciated. Mary Anne Houx S�964,L b jN AL1,KGU- 12/17/2004 c_ v✓ \ � 0 BUTTE COQ1�� v Ty C®OP4Si L OCT - 6 2004 Bruce Alpert OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA Felix Wannenmacher Office of County Counsel County of Butte 25 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 October 3, 2004 Dear Sirs, Since I have not heard back from you after 'my call last week, I am sending you a letter as you requested. In response to your letter dated September 2, 2004 (a copy of which is enclosed) We are not nor have we ever "knowingly" allowed tenants to conduct -an estate - liquidation business out of the mini storage units here at ANCHOR STORAGE. A tenant asked to have a garage sale to consolidate the things that they had from three units down to one .... we had no prior knowledge that they were going to call it an "estate liquidation sale". We did however allow them to come into our facility. prior to our normal opening hours, to price their items, which was a mistake on our parts, as they. did make some noise at that time. We upon receiving a complaint from our neighbor, told our tenant that they could no longer sell items out of their units, and in fact, refunded their rental money and asked -them to vacate their units. We are very sorry for the problem that occurred...... we are adhering to our operating hours, and in the future will not let any of our tenants conduct a garage sale or any type of sale out of their storage units. We have gone to our neighbor and apologized and assured them that a sale of this type would not happen again. We are sorry. for. the problem that this one incident has caused. Sincerely, Barry7W neroth, Owner Anchor Storage BRUCE S. ALPERT COUNTY COUNSEL OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL COUNTY OF BUTTE 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3380 PHONE (530) 538-7621 FAX(530)538-6891 countycounsel@buttecounty.net September 2, 2004 ASSISTANT COUNTY COUNSEL DAVID M. MCCLAIN CHIEF DEPUTY COUNTY COUNSEL ROBERT W. MACKENZIE DEPUTY COUNTY COUNSEL FELIX WANNENMACHER ELIZABETH McGIE BRAD J. STEPHENS Barry Wineroth c/o Anchor Inn Storage 725 Eaton Road Chico, CA" 95973' Re: Resolution of Compatibility Conflicts with Adjoining Residential Properties (UP 98-12) Dear Mr. Wineroth, We have received information that certain activities conducted on your mini -storage property are giving rise to .compatibility conflicts with adjoining residential uses. Specifically, you have allowed tenants to enter the facility before and after your set hours of operation, and you are allowing tenants to conduct an estate liquidation business out of mini -storage units. These activities have called into question several findings made. in approving your use permit. Specifically, your hours of operation were to continue to remain compatible with adjoining residences, and the nature of your use was to continue to generate little noise or traffic. I have spoken with your manager, April, and she assured me that you wanted to work out any compatibility conflicts, that you would adhere to your hours of operation, and that you would not let individuals conduct a business out of your mini -storage units. It is in the interest of all parties, including yourself, that you clearly specify that you will maintain your hours of operation and not allow activities that will generate noise or traffic. We are 1 requesting that you sign a statement acknowledging your need to maintain compatibility with adjoining residential uses. This office will help in the preparation of this statement. We request that you contact this office and arrange to have' the statement signed within thirty (30) days. If we are unable to work this issue out in this manner, the matter will be set for a hearing of the Planning Commission to determine whether your use permit should be modified or revoked to assure compatibility. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, BRUCE S. ALPERT Butte County Counsel By Felix W nnenmacher Deputy County Counsel CC-: Mary Ann Houx, Supervisor, District 3 Yvonne Christopher, Development Services Director G:\FELIX\Anchor Inn Storage Itl.wpd 2 BRUCE S. ALPERT COUNTY COUNSEL OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL COUNTY OF BUTTE 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3380 PHONE (530) 538-7621 FAX (530) 538-6891 countycounsel@buttecounty.net September 2, 2004 ASSISTANT COUNTY COUNSEL DAVID M. MCCLAIN CHIEF DEPUTY COUNTY COUNSEL ROBERT W. MACKENZIE DEPUTY COUNTY COUNSEL FELIX WANNENMACHER ELIZABETH McGIE BRAD J. STEPHENS Barry Wineroth c/o Anchor Inn Storage 725 Eaton Road Chico, CA 95973 Re: Resolution of Compatibility Conflicts with Adjoining Residential Properties (UP 98-12) Dear Mr. Wineroth, We have received information that certain activities conducted on your mini -storage property are giving rise to compatibility conflicts with adjoining residential uses. Specifically, you have allowed tenants to enter the facility before and after your set hours of operation, and you .are allowing tenants to conduct an estate liquidation business out of mini_storage units. These activities have called into question several findings made in approving your use permit. Specifically, your hours of operation were to continue to remain compatible with adjoining residences, and the nature of your use was to continue to generate little noise or traffic. I have spoken with your manager, April, and she assured me that you wanted to work out any compatibility conflicts, that you would adhere to your hours of operation, and that you would not let individuals conduct a business out of your mini -storage units. It is in the interest of all parties, including yourself, that you clearly specify that you will maintain your hours of operation and not allow activities that will generate noise or traffic. We are 1 requesting that you sign a statement acknowledging your need to maintain compatibility with adjoining residential uses. This office will help in the preparation of this statement. We request that you contact this office and arrange to have the statement signed within thirty (30) days. If we are unable to work this issue out in this manner, the matter will be set for a hearing of the Planning Commission to determine whether your use permit should be modified or revoked to assure compatibility. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, BRUCE S. ALPERT Butte County Counsel By Felix W nnenmacher Deputy County Counsel CC:. Mary Ann.Houx, Supervisor, District 3 Yvonne Christopher, Development Services Director G:\FELIX\Anchor Inn Storage ltl.wpd 2 USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 15. 1498 DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) UP 98-12 PERMIT NO. 007-210-060 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: Cathy & Harry Webster is hereby granted a Use Permit in accordance with application filed on -November 3, 1997, for a Use Permit for the expansion ofa mini - storage. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the'revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth- in the Butte County. Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Use Permit, all conditions must be completed prior to, or concurrently with, the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 24 months of the delivery of the countersigned permit to the Permittee. If any use for which a use permit has been granted is not established within two year of the date of receipt of the countersigned permit by the Permittee, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. 4. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 5. Approval of this permit shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable State and County laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit application. 6. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act identifying potentially significant environmental effects that the project may have. Provisions and the design of the project and the conditions added to the project will mitigate such effects to a level of insignificance; and B. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a de minimus exemption to the collection of Department of Fish and Game Environmental Filing Fees is recommended; and C. The Planning Commission has independently reviewed, analyzed, and .considered the proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures prior to making its decision on the project, and -the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement of Butte County; and Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed use of the property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with, or injurious to, surrounding property; or detrimental to the health, safety 'and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood, or to the general health, welfare and safety of the County because: .r, 1. The mini -storage expansion will incorporate a number of building design features to provide modern facilities which meet current building codes while replacing some aged facilities; and 2. .The use does not represent a change from the historical use of the site which has existed compatibly with adjoining residential properties for 'approximately 40 years; and 3. The hours of operation are compatible. with adjoining uses and security lighting will be conditioned to minimize impacts to adjoining residences; and The_nature:of the. us e_generates _little _noise:or traffic and the operations are spread out over the entire operating day resulting in no particular time of peals activity that could disrupt neighboring residences; and Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings in Sections 1 and 2 of this Exhibit move to approve the Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster APN 007-210-060 to allow the replacement and expansion of mini -storage facilities. Approval shall be subject to the following conditions: B. Conditions of Approval: Mitigation Measures: 1. All outside lighting fixtures shall utilize " low spillover" design where all direct lighting shall remain on-site, allowing only reflective lighting to spillover into those areas off-site. 2. During construction, should any archaeological artifacts be discovered, the Planning Division shall be notified immediately, and all work shall cease until a qualified archaeologist has examined the artifacts and,the site and submitted his or her findings to the Planning Division, and recommended clearance to continue. Recommencement of construction shall be upon the approval'of the Planning Division." Planning Division Conditions: 3.. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan consistent with the project site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. Building Division. 5. Prior to building permit issuance for a new commercial or industrial development, or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay all applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time of acceptance of the application. Such fees shall include; but not be limited to: School Fee, Drainage Fee; Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, and Fire Protection Fees. 6. - Obtain required building permits. Plans shall be prepared by a design professional licensed or registered to practice'in the State of California. 7. Comply with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 8_-:...._::.Exist ing_building(s)-which.areaubject to a changed use shall be made to comply with ........ ....... current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended new use of the building(s) or the existing building(s) shall be demolished. Public Works Conditions: 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits deed to Butte County, in fee simple, 40 feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Eaton Road. The right-of-way shall be sufficient for the installation of standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. 10. Execute and record against the property a covenant running with the land requiring the landowner to submit road and drainage improvement plans and construct street frontage improvements on Eaton Road to an RS -I 4 lane standard, including, but not limited to, P.C.C. curb, gutter and sidewalk and the required street section, when neighboring properties are similarly improved. 0 11. .Prior to the recordation of the issuance of building permits a plan for a permanent . solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall.specify how drainage waters shall be detained or retained on-site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peals flow runoff to said channel or facility. Environmental Health Conditions: 12. Prior to issuance of building permits for Phase II, the applicant shall complete work for the abandonment of well and septic tanks as per Environmental Health requirements. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they. are in. fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division . Building Division Health,Department .. .. . _....... California Department of Forestry Anchor Inn Storage 725 Eaton Road Chico, CA 95973. (530) 342-2996 Steve Betts, Planner Butte County Development Services Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 November 19, 1998 Steve, Enclosed is the Landscape and Irrigation plan for the storage. property on Eaton Road, Chico. The plan is to satisfy condition # 3 on our Use permit # 98-12. All the landscaping is established, and has been thriving for many years. If there are any questions, please call me. I would like to get to the process of building at least before the year is over. I hope to hear from you within the next ten days. Sincerely, Cathy Webs er, owner, manager 0 Planning 0visi®n NOY 2 31998 C)rOvIls®9 alfto is Name (print): ANCHOR-a-N N S I,. km6_ • Scale of Drawing, O 1" - C'1" = 20' O 1" = 30' -2-JO *ko' 000 -- - -- - -- sc �-- _ - -a^dP� vs®: 3� ,., ,s G, - t^ � O fit; Acd' T' skps-Y p0, Ffo�t HI's rr- > 0. Stt,PS QF fo W cr,} C4 Wn (awn eS S s y cin � C o Trte', 1. L FC dl F1 Ga{ e- - ... �,Yrl .. IOn = OY "A6I6 s r�nk��f S iY►-�� Si Nl� 01 M • _1 ti �l • i> 3 ILU 1 .� . s z Q a M 4- fA� oz� v N Q /L j5�vISnNC„ J SL 4 bj Q �.. !u V -... -'s LL, K 1- -VI v MEA vl ku ,� a %A V) 2' Q 'O !„ ks _ ti, r v O D to !i ce IQ N f� % Lu v ` IP 5 3 `^ n ci �- 0 -vz Z 6E a wi Idl � r o n 4t (� L 01 M 1st t., I LSI rlc,T�1 i� j: 1' i 1 s' . 4 S 4 A, a S y • _1 ti �l • i> 3 ILU 1 .� . 1st t., I LSI rlc,T�1 i� j: 1' i 1 s' . 4 S 4 A, a S y _ 11 �—,—_• ... _ .. _ . _... Q A 11�120POS'.=p STOR C -A C-1 Co ai S J ` 5 to f0- + �• c, w W .nom 1 i ' $, .. .. ...... .. ,.. W Ham; �n d 3 O Pao?OwD STIOR 3DI ?FIASF 1T ti ry propos>_ Q STOR , O In o , 3:�' �NASe 7L 3 lu • � r � � N ILU .� . j5�vISnNC„ MEA V) 2' Q ks _ I ol lO IP = _ 11 �—,—_• ... _ .. _ . _... Q A 11�120POS'.=p STOR C -A C-1 Co ai S J ` 5 to f0- + �• c, w W .nom 1 i ' $, .. .. ...... .. ,.. W Ham; �n d 3 O Pao?OwD STIOR 3DI ?FIASF 1T ti ry propos>_ Q STOR , O In o , 3:�' �NASe 7L 3 lu • � r � � N I NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO: _ Office of Plan.& Research Dept. 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 X Butte County Clerk • J U L 1201998 00 C A JB[5s, Butte Co. ck-'k FROM: Butte County Planning 's eputy 7 County Center Dr., Oroville 95965 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. { Project Title: UP 98-12, Use Permit AP Number: 007-210-060 Applicant: Cathy and Harry Webster, 725 Eaton Rd., Chico, CA 95973 State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to clearinghouse): Contact Person: Stephen Hackney Telephone Number: 538-7601 Project Location: on the south side of Eaton Rd., approximately 600 ft. west of Morseman Ave., at 725 Eaton Rd., Chico. Project Description: Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business This is to advise that the Butte County Planning Commission has approved the above-described project on April 23, 1998, and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1. The project will, _X_ will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X_ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures _X_ were, were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations was, X was not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at: Date received for filing and posting at OPR Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Ah ..,) ge�A� Craig Saolers Principal Planner CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FILING FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding (Fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4; Section 753.5c, Title 14, California Code of Regulations) Project Title / Butte County Location: UP 98-12, on the south side of Eaton Road, approximately 600 ft. west of Morseman Ave., at 725 Eaton Rd., Chico Project Description: Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The county of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a (Negative Declaration or Enviornmental Impact) so as to evaluate the potential of this project for adverse environmental impact: 2. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence before the County that the project will have potential for an adverse impact on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. 3. The County of Butte has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5 (d), of Title 14, California Code of Regulations, if applicable. 4. The project is hereby found to be de minimis in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the State Fish and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. Certification: I hereby certify that the County of Butte has made the above findings of fact and that based upon the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. By: Craig Sand s, Principal Planner Lead Agency: County of Butte Date: July 15, 1998 j A1inda\noe.nod\f&g.let DECLARATION OF FEES DUE ( lifornia Fish and Game Code Section4p.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Cathy and Harry Webster 725 Eaton Rd. Chico, CA 95973 (530) 342-2996 FILING NO. CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION () A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee (X) B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED () A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. ( ) OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT / NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). #16503 2. () NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: Craig Sanders Title: Papal Planner Lead Agency: Butte Ci II M&=6I1: TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. J ATE RANO E. NODI&G. F EE 1 voz� 0 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 16503 ISSUEDTY ANCIiOR INN STORAG 1752 725 EATON RD. 530-342-2996 CHICO, CA 95973 DATE 90-3896/1211 PAY TO TH E ORDER OF &41 pal) DMb DOLLARS bk NO STAT Fifth & Salem x 235 NATIONAL I/ 0-OCA195927-3235 RANK (530C)8'93-1573 NP Fo Zgnl�?� 316 1 P 1, 7 S 2 1110� LE3 30 ?0 ling 9 eJ RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC - LAFCO U USE �A ANCES R. I PUBLIC ZONING ,ENV OTHER PLICANT RECEIVED FROM DATE H. Eceiva0 WORKS TS _ PERMITS DOCUMENTSHEALTH OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 16503 ISSUEDTY ANCIiOR INN STORAG 1752 725 EATON RD. 530-342-2996 CHICO, CA 95973 DATE 90-3896/1211 PAY TO TH E ORDER OF &41 pal) DMb DOLLARS bk NO STAT Fifth & Salem x 235 NATIONAL I/ 0-OCA195927-3235 RANK (530C)8'93-1573 NP Fo Zgnl�?� 316 1 P 1, 7 S 2 1110� LE3 30 ?0 ling APPENDIX G NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the project described below has been reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code 21100, et. seq.) and a determination has been made that it will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Assessor's Parcel No. 007-210-060 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business 3. LOCATION OF PROJECT: on the south side of Eaton Road, approixmately 600 ft. west of Morseman Ave., at 725 Eaton Rd. 4. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT: Cathy and Harry Webster, 725 Eaton Rd., Chico, CA 95973 5. MITIGATION MEASURES: See Attatched 6. A copy of the initial study regarding the environmental effect of this project is on file at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville. This study was: _X_ Adopted as presented. Adopted with changes. Specific modifications and supporting reasons are attached. 7. A public hearing on this Negative Declaration was held by the decision making body. Hearing Body: Butte County Planning Commission Date of Determination:nn '123, 1998 Determination: On the basis of the initial study of environmental impact, the information presented at hearings, comments received on the proposal and our own knowledge and independent research: We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby adopted. __2L We find that the project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, but will not in this case because of attached mitigation measures described in item 5 above, which are by this reference made conditions of project approval. A conditional NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby adopted. Nin Lambert, Chairman Butte County Planning Commission Date: 1. All outside lighting fixtures shall utilize "low spillover" design where all direct lighting shall remain on-site, allowing only reflective lighting to spillover into those areas off-site. 2. During construction, should any archaeological artifacts be discovered, the Planning Division shall be notified immediately, and all work shall cease until a qualified archaeologist has examined the artifacts and the site and submitted his or her findings to the Planning Division, and recommended clearance to continue. Recommencement of construction shall be upon the approval of the Planning Division." a INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION ell To: File From: David Dood6- Subject: Condition # 10 UP 98-12 Date: 8/26/98 Asa follow-up to our conversation, I am noting the file regarding condition #10. Cathy Webster contacted me and was concerned that her engineer was told by the PWD that the submittal of full improvement plans was required now instead of at a future time when the Director of Public Works would determine that such improvements would be necessary. Stu Edell told me that this was in error. All they are requiring is the recordation of a covenant pursuant to Condition # 10 and that plans would be submitted at a future time when neighboring properties are similarly improved. Project: A. P. NO.: AFTER RECORDING, RETURN TO: BUTTE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION AGREEMENT RUNNING WITH THE LAND FOR INSTALLATION OF CURBS, GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS AND OTHER URBAN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the undersigned are presently the owners of that land commonly known as A.P. , located in Butte County, California, the legal description of which is set forth on EXHIBIT A, attached hereto and incorporated herein and; WHEREAS, said owners propose to develop said land by parcel map or a commercial or multi- family development, and hereby specifically agree that when the County of Butte determines in. its discretion that it is in the best interest of this particular area to install curbs, gutters and sidewalks, or other urban improvements, the undersigned or their successor in interest, upon notification by County of Butte, hereby consent to said installation and agree to install the same upon demand of the County, at their own expense or at the expense of their successor in interest. The undersigned or their successor in interest, hereby agree that such improvements may be installed by County and become a lien upon the property. 11 The undersigned hereby agree to cooperate and support the County of Butte in obtaining the permission and approval of property owners within any assessment district, within which the above- described property- is included, formed for the purpose of installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks or other urban improvements. In consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable .consideration, the undersigned owners of said parcel, expressly agree that the foregoing shall be an agreement running with the land and shall be binding upon their heirs and all successors in interest. Dated Dated Signature of owner of record Signature of owner of record SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED FormsWgmement Running with the Land August 11, 1998 Cathy and Harry Webster 725 Eaton Rd. Chico, CA 95973 Re: UP 98-12 APN 007-210-060 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Webster: Enclosed is Receipt No. 16567 in the amount of $272.75 for the above -referenced file. As of this date, the account has a zero balance and is closed. Your quick response is greatly appreciated. Thank you. Sincerely, e p k Y Thomas A. Parilo TAP:pa Enclosure �l utt Count LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Enclosed is Receipt No. 16567 in the amount of $272.75 for the above -referenced file. As of this date, the account has a zero balance and is closed. Your quick response is greatly appreciated. Thank you. Sincerely, e p k Y Thomas A. Parilo TAP:pa Enclosure /AAlcHan IAJS .SToa/A66 325 EATON I?OAD C'f�/C'a, C'� 55533 (530) 342-255, �'��✓G ��ooj � f- aGv P6anKin9 ®apartment AVG I t INS ®r®vote, Cali O"" OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 16567 �40 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING oda RECEIPT 16503 DATE RECEIPT• TOTAL PUBLIC LAFCO USE vAR1ANCE5 PUBLIC ZONING ENV OTHER PLICANT RECEIVED FROM NO. RECEIVED WORKS PERMITS DOCUMENTS HEALTH t OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING oda RECEIPT 16503 April 23, 1998 Cathy and Harry Wesbster 725 Eaton Road Chico, CA 95973 ... _..... utte Co L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY Re: Use Permit, AP 007-210-060, FILE UP 98-12 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Webster: PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held April 23, 1998, your request for a Use Permit for expansion of a mini -storage, was approved subject to the conditions listed on the enclosures. Please sign both copies and return both copies to this Division within 40 calendar days. Should you desire to appeal any of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, you must do so in writing, to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to 5:00 p.m., Monday, May 4, 1998. The appeal fee of $50.00 must be paid at that time. If you do not appeal and if there are no other appeal within the 10 calendar -day appeal period, the actioryo>nn>na Commissio A :Notice of Determination (NOD) should be filed for purpose of completing the California -_' environmental quality Act requirements. The fee for filing the NOD is a $25.00 document handling fee. _- my Treasurer in the amount of $25.00 should b ubmitted to the Planning Division in order to complete the process. Please be vva e that failure to return the signed copies within 40 c ays will invalidate the Planning Commission s appro fie=applY� on o is ivision would then be necessary. The Use Permit is deemed granted when the enclosures have been signed by the applicant, with the counter signature of the Chairman of the Planning Commission, and said permit is received by the v. applicant by registered mail. Pursuant to Section 66020 (d) (2) of the Government Code you are hereby notified that you have 90 days to register a protest challenging any fees, dedications, reservations, or exactions imposed as "a conditions of approval for this project. 4• Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Hackney at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. USE PERMIT 6 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 5 1998 DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) UP 98-12 PERMIT NO. 007-210-060 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: Cathy & Harry Webster is hereby granted a Use Permit in accordance with application filed on November 3, 1997, for a Use Permit for the expansion of a mini - storage. , Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Use Permit, all conditions must be completed prior to, or concurrently with, the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 24 months of the delivery of the countersigned permit to the Permittee. 3. If any use for which a use permit has been granted is not established within two year of the date of receipt of the countersigned permit by the Permittee, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. 4. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 5. Approval of this permit shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning , Ordinance and all other applicable State and County laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit application. 6. Minor changes may be, approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved.l Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act identifying potentially significant environmental effects that the project may have. Provisions and the design of the project and the conditions added to the project will mitigate such effects to a level of insignificance; and B. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a de minimus exemption to the collection of Department of Fish and Game Environmental Filing Fees is recommended; and C. The Planning Commission has independently reviewed, analyzed, and considered the proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures prior to making its decision on the project, and the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement of Butte County, and Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed use of the property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with, or injurious to, surrounding property, or detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood, or to the general health, welfare and safety of the County because: 1. The mini -storage expansion will incorporate a number of building design features to provide modern facilities which meet current building codes while replacing some aged facilities; and 2. The use does not represent a change from the historical use of the site which has existed compatibly with adjoining residential properties for approximately 40 years; and 3. The hours of operation are compatible. with adjoining uses and security lighting will be conditioned to minimize impacts to adjoining residences; and 4. The nature of the use generates little noise or traffic and the operations are spread out over the entire operating day resulting in no particular time of peak activity that could disrupt neighboring residences; and Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings in Sections 1 and 2 of this Exhibit move to approve the Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster APN 007-210-060 to allow the replacement and expansion of mini -storage facilities. Approval shall be subject to the following conditions: B. Conditions of Approval: Mitigation Measures: 1. All outside lighting fixtures shall utilize "low spillover" design where all direct lighting shall remain on-site, allowing only reflective lighting to spillover into those areas off-site. 2. During construction, should any archaeological artifacts be discovered, the Planning Division shall be notified immediately, and all work shall cease until a qualified archaeologist has examined the artifacts and the site and submitted his or her findings to the Planning Division, and recommended clearance to continue. Recommencement of construction shall be upon the approval of the Planning Division." Planning Division Conditions: 3. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan consistent with the project site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. Building Division. 5. Prior to building permit issuance for a new commercial or industrial development, or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay all applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time of acceptance of the application. Such fees shall include, but not be limited to: School Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, and Fire Protection Fees. 6. Obtain required building permits. Plans shall be prepared by a design professional licensed or registered to practice in the State of California. 7. Comply with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire -resistiveness of existing buildings. 8. Existing building(s) which are subject to a changed use shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended new use of the building(s) or the existing building(s) shall be demolished. Public Works Conditions: 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits deed to Butte County, in fee simple, 40 feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Eaton Road. The -right-of-way shall be sufficient for the installation of standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. , 10. Execute and record against the property a covenant running with the land requiring the landowner to submit road and drainage improvement plans and construct street frontage improvements on Eaton Road to an RS -I 4 lane standard, including, but not limited to, P.C.C. curb, gutter and sidewalk and the required street section, when neighboring properties are similarly improved. • 11. .Prior to the recordation of the issuance of building permits a plan for a permanent . solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. ,The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained or retained on-site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel'or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. Environmental Health Conditions: 12. Prior to issuance of building permits for Phase II, the applicant shall complete work for the abandonment of well and septic tanks as per Environmental Health requirements. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman ; CC: Land Development Division Building Division Health Department California Department of Forestry f WIES ; I •NV 5.1601PICAa.t L4 E .or- SePrrG 1011r;,Cl(?AT6 CAMN, AVFMvf Z. PAPM144 K uM,reb —,o WA61 obi _ Iu Ul t_;_ly. © IN P20Nt or- Sroa,cc.F LIM p ar/�c ns� uwr ' t - V0 orrr ®d ' ufo Sloe: WA►.1�. kt;j . �ojl:6 USE IS_. UNCI}, Ito IF NI . NO EAIDlJ RJ• i x� / wG� I ti tl 111 j/I 1 1 30 lot +• - O 1 ^ - - AYZ/MITER OF aROPA uE FM�L "AJW .6 R N..Y RE! oC4 i6 OW' OF 11RAIJ51,0 WAy -, mopow!> ;i -'M -S- I sc ro r-_P.A': , --- S. ALL c0usTR.vcr0)J SAALL NAEE'r3WT e -- 2c�t,112r:MrQIS. .war. co+. . •COOMIN 1 - wtiNuE — -- tor s r«r L. W. r �p En C r 6 itkuct iE c, vlr�t81 Heath G I os' I bo t�lsr(ac, _ f �! EY►I ISTN1►iGlc r. RAc atv zs 6L. bG• _ Z 4 0i NOV NIS AL -L, Chid'v�•Carf% c 1111',> A A/ a1C omta —' ida� `tl� 1 £xrs^>vG vb HlcLC a'>3P ►` APPRVE p� V E sT kala ` \ t) O i Plan nen � .L, MAY 15 1998 ' DATE 'foo USE PERMIT...J�,IARIANCE `y INOR U.P....,... i;�15rrJrn sly,=�3:��,. � � �s� cx,s-�� sfoR��= �1.� . r �a e� yob_ - -3S %A ALL I+ANU►CAP• ACCESS . .tZPLANNiNGCOMMISS. ' �pIv 23 umirS A:.L PANAKAPS': Arc t'sSr'• I 1 ti "o FCTOR OF--- OPMENT SERVICES Planning Division '5Ql VIE ScPn` - 5; A.. caAw NOV .0 3 1991 Oroville, California/ Leo oar e z a %4,T MONDFlo (�IiASE jr.I i j YEu,c L,!� m r T� Sr�� jO�.arf•FM IJ I ! i SiJ2Qa -° b Wet,t IF=1 f!! I I I /tA tJ S ✓+ ° a Ap LL JJ7-0 CAGr 11-;0 (AW-) -) �BIZ%� N A-ZI FENCE �( 73Z 76 / `f I la - azr ReucN I J ?20 ('oscL) SIT -c- nL A A Fo," s AP-* oo1— Lir, -oho -000, : 5-�� mcHoR: �W s5LF sroieAGE 7jS eau b. cN1cc ZGNc -, s (Z 5C4 it CaTW/ d H Al2R\/ wE3S-Te-9s`q73 W cio0 �R !c i• ISr�W IA)GL- Fmc�cl * rtf. fix. stA-Ic Q P' Pi G 1 ;: SENDER: ■Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the ■Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. =' following services (for an ■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): card to you. ■Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address perm. ■Retum Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery ■The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date delivered. IConsult postmaster for fee. 3. Article Addressed to: Cathy & Harry Webster 725 Eaton Rd. Chico, CA 95973 UP 98-12 5. Rec' d By: (Print Name) ,t 6. Signa V ;AdVaresee Ager PS FefrriT811, becember 1994 4a. Article Number P 796 162 234 4b. Service Type ❑ Registered ® Certified ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested and fee is paid) rn UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE - First -Class MailPostage & Fees Paid uSPS Permit No. G-10 • Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in this box • COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DaWpMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIMION 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 959653397 May 15, 1998 Cathy and Harry Webster 725 Eaton Rd. Chico, CA 95973 CERTIFIED Re: Use Permit, AP 007-210-060 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Webster: LV LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Enclosed is your validated Use Permit No. UP 98-12 to allow an expansion of a mini -storage business. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.-- - _ - -�— - - - j_ P 796 1,62 r -?34 Sincerely, Certified Mail Receipt No Insurance Coverage Provided Thomas A. Parilo Do not use for International Mail Director of Development Services ' iSBB REVPfSP.\ Teri Bridenhagen r b Office Assistant III Enc. cc: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department of Forestry j:\temo\up7 Sent to Cathy & Harry Webste Street & No. 725 Eaton Rd. P.O., State & ZIP Code Gwiico, CA 95973 Postage !1 Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing rn rn to Whom & Date Delivered Return Receipt Showing to Whom, Date, & Address of Delivery TOTAL Postage p & Fees co Postmark or Date M LL 5-18-98 U) Q. MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: Butte County Assessor's. Office FROM: Butte County Planning Department SUBJECT: Cathy and Harry Webster, UP 98-12 DATE: May 15, 1998 Pursuant to Section 65863.5 of the Government Code, the'following parcel identified as 007-210-060, was: Rezone from to zoning district. Granted a variance, to - Issued a conditional Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business, on the south side of Eaton Road, approximately 600 ft. west of Morseman Ave., at 725 Eaton Road, Chico,SR (Suburban Residential) Planning Division u�;a-, C'a 9593 APR 2 1 1998 kozC?rnvillo, ea!iforn!3 apAL -,2 3) 4.10 A 'i A" . 0, qt -.t& v 5- &&, Rmj, alk a,&L, AM-) . , � CGU� � QAC 4��uX'mL ..lrtu t n2p6�� AMI — �Q,.e,wt ,60 �,re�a�- ✓iav�v . 3. a4, 04ru&t Niru �Rao�d, �u 1449 -x000 � oMo� �+.e �� G�x.��i .2,e. -aooa. .ao „cam- ticre'z' t �x� 1' I Planning Division APR 2 11998 —q 72 � �a�ifoml� 9 �c,r�vill3, - . f- t April 23, 1998 Cathy and Harry Wesbster 725 Eaton Road Chico, CA 95973 • ,gaffe Co LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 Re: Use Permit, AP 007-210-060, FILE UP 98-12 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Webster: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held April 23, 1998, your request for a Use Permit for expansion of a mini -storage, was approved subject to the conditions listed on the enclosures. Please sign both copies and return both copies to this Division within 40 calendar days. Should you desire to appeal any of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, you must do so in writing, to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to 5:00 p.m., Monday, May 4, 1998. The appeal fee of $50.00 must be paid at that time. If you do not appeal and if there are no other appeal within the 10 calendar -day appeal period, the action of the Planning Commission is final. A Notice of Determination (NOD) should be filed for purpose of completing the California environmental quality Act requirements. The fee for filing the NOD is a $25.00 document handling fee. A check made payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $25.00 should be submitted to the Planning Division in order to complete the process. Please be aware that failure to return the signed copies within 40 calendar days will invalidate the Planning Commission's approval. Re-application to this Division would then be necessary. The Use Permit is deemed granted when the enclosures have been signed by the applicant, with the counter signature of the Chairman of the Planning Commission, and said permit is received by the applicant by registered mail. Pursuant to Section 66020 (d) (2) of the Government Code you are hereby notified that you have 90 days to register a protest challenging any fees, dedications, reservations, or exactions imposed as conditions of approval for this project. Should you have any questions, regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Hackney at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. • Sincerely, Diana Shuey \ Secretary k:\forms\approvu p. fret • USE PERMIT L] BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) UP 98-12 PERMIT NO. 007-210-060 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: Cathy & HarryWebster is hereby granted a Use Permit in accordance with application filed on November 3, 1997, for a Use Permit for the expansion of a mini - storage. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Use Permit, all conditions must be completed prior to, or concurrently with, the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 24 months of the delivery of the countersigned permit to the Permittee. 3. If any use for which a use permit has been granted is not established within two year of the date of receipt of the countersigned permit by the Permittee, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. 4. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the -land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 5. Approval of this permit shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable State and County laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit application. 6. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act identifying potentially significant environmental effects that the project may have. Provisions and the design of the project and the conditions added to the project will mitigate such effects to a level of insignificance; and B. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a de minimus exemption to the collection of Department of Fish and Game Environmental Filing Fees is recommended; and C. The Planning Commission has independently reviewed, analyzed, and considered the proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures prior to making its decision on the project, and the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement of Butte County; and Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed use of the property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible with, or injurious to, surrounding property, or detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood, or to the general health, welfare and safety of the County because: The mini -storage expansion will incorporate a number of building design features to provide modern facilities which meet current building codes while replacing some aged facilities; and 2. The use does not represent a change from the historical use of the site which has existed compatibly with adjoining residential properties for approximately 40 years; and 3. The hours of operation are compatible with adjoining uses and security lighting will be conditioned to minimize impacts to adjoining residences; and 4. The nature of the use generates little noise or traffic and the operations are spread out over the entire operating day resulting in no particular time of peak activity that could disrupt neighboring residences; and Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings in Sections 1 and 2 of this Exhibit move to approve the Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster APN 007-210-060 to allow the replacement and expansion of mini -storage facilities. Approval shall be subject to the following conditions: B. Conditions of Approval: Mitigation Measures: All outside lighting fixtures shall utilize "low spillover" design where all direct lighting shall remain on-site, allowing only reflective lighting to spillover into those areas off-site. 2. During construction, should any archaeological artifacts be discovered, the Planning Division shall be notified immediately, and all work shall cease until a qualified archaeologist has examined the artifacts and the site and submitted his or her findings to the Planning Division, and recommended clearance to continue. Recommencement of construction shall be upon the approval of the Planning Division." Planning Division Conditions: A detailed landscape and irrigation plan consistent with the project site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. Building Division. Prior to building permit issuance for a new commercial or industrial development, or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay all applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time of acceptance of the application. Such fees shall include, but not be limited to: School Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, and Fire Protection Fees. 6. Obtain required building permits. Plans shall be prepared by a design professional licensed or registered to practice in the State of California. 7. Comply with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire -resistiveness of existing buildings. Existing building(s) which are subject to a changed use shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended new use of the building(s) or the existing building(s) shall be demolished. Public Works Conditions: 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits deed to Butte County, in fee simple, 40 feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Eaton Road. The right-of-way shall be sufficient for the installation of standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. 10. Execute and record against the property a covenant running with the land requiring the landowner to submit road and drainage improvement plans and construct street frontage improvements on Eaton Road to an RS -I 4 lane standard, including, but not limited to, P.C.C. curb, gutter and sidewalk and the required street section, when neighboring properties are similarly improved. 11. Prior to the recordation of the issuance of building permits a plan for a permanent solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained or retained on-site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. Environmental Health Conditions: 12. Prior to issuance of building permits for Phase II, the applicant shall complete work for the abandonment of well and septic tanks as per Environmental Health requirements: I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Health Department California Department of Forestry Planning Division ('q .959 3 APR 2 11998 ®rodiiio, C-0i#orn a a i,Hti�F� Z%46 930-l2 �e�,cr4.cd ✓te�i.acued� a� "r G�rwnze.2a�,ew ,i� _,23j ! �19Y - 9:00 �- M OA, J,,,awrurla� Aqt Cd/146t u U �o a��r��n��.e.� ✓�ainc.� . 3. Cha, 0 41WL14 �Ptiao,eo( .� -Owl -aooa, Az� U E �4f2 95"x/ 73 R Planning Division APR 2 11998 OrO Vllh, �o!Ifor�la Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 COUNTY OF BUTTE INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS I. BACKGROUND: Name of Proponent Cathy & Harry Webster 2. Address 725 Eaton Road, Chico, CA 95973 Phone (530) 342-2996 3. Name of Proposal, if applicable n/a 4. Type of Project Use Permit 5. Project Description and Location of Parcel(s): The application is a request for a Use Permit to replace and expand new mini storage facilities, in three phases over the next five years. The project consists of three. development phases: Phase I. Replace 22 existing storage boxes in a deteriorated state, covering 1,376 sq. ft, with two buildings totaling 2,100 sq. ft. One building will contain 12 storage units, 10'X25'.. The second building will contain 3 storage units, 10'X10'. Construction -is proposed for 1998. Phase II. Construct three buildings each sized at 80'X30' for a total of 7,200 sq. ft. The buildings are to be located on the undeveloped portion in the northwest corner of the property. Each building will contain 8 units, each 10'X20', and 16 units, each 5'X10'. Construction is proposed for 1999-2000. Phase III. Construct one building sized at 120X35', covering 8,400_sq. ft., on the undeveloped west side of the property. The building will contain 12 units, each 10'X15', and 12 units, each 10'X20'. Construction is proposed for 2001-2002. The property consists of 3.65 acres developed with'a number of existing structures besides the storage facilities: a double -wide mobile home for the managers located at the south end of the property, a single -wide mobile home for the caretaker at the northern end of the property, three wells, two septic systems, and two propane tanks servicing the residences. The project is located on 3.65 acres of land in the northern urban area of Chico, on the south side of Eaton Road, half way between Godman Avenue and Morseman Avenue. Surrounding land uses include a mixture of agricultural uses of both row crop and orchards on the north and south, rural residential development on the east and west, with urban residential development located several parcels removed to the south and southwest. The property site is zoned SR (Suburban Residential), and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density Residential. Neither the zoning or land use designation make provision for a mini storage use, however, the current facilities constitute a pre- existing nonconforming use. The assortment of buildings were constructed at various dates, but the earliest mini storage use dates back over 40 years ago, predating the zoning classification of SR by approximately 20-25 years. Elevation on the property is approximately 220 feet. The site topography is characterized by level terrain - 0% to 2% slope. The vegetation on site is limited to a number of trees in the northwest corner of the property, and an assortment of shrubs, trees and plants around the manager's residence. Access to the site is provided from Eaton Road, atone point, on the property's north boundary. The soil consists of Ulna clay loam adobe, which is characterized as retaining water well, but having slow 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 infiltration. 6. Assessor's Parcel Numbers 007-210-060 II. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: ■ 1 find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will NOT be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION with mitigation(s) will be prepared. ■ I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Prepared y: Reviewed by N1w� 25/ 19"9' Date ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 2 0 Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 • III. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. X Land Use and Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation 0 Public Services 0 Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities/ServiceSystems 0 Geophysical 0 Energy and Mineral Resources X Aesthetics X Water ❑ Hazards ❑ Cultural Resources 0 Air Quality X Noise/Light & Glare Recreation EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact.simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant if there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in a earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 3 Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 Potentially Significant Impact IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? • Potentially Significant Less Unless Than Mitigation Significant Incorporated Impact X X No Impact X X X Response: The mini storage facilities constitute a nonconforming use in the SR (Suburban Residential) zone as well as in the Low Density Development land use designation. The existing use is a pre- existing nonconforming use that pre -dates the zoning classification. The SR zoning ordinance for this area was approved September 1980. The mini storage use existed approximately 20 years prior to this date. The project, although not consistent with the existing zoning and general plan designation, is determined to be an expansion of a pre-existing nonconforming use which does not present any potentially significant environmental impacts. Although the mini storage use is not consistent with the zoning and land use designation, the use is not determined to constitute a significant impact in terns of compatibility with existing land uses in the vicinity. The commercial use of this property dates back to approximately 1960, with additional mini storage facilities added in 1965, 1972, and 1975 (pers comm. Al Petersen, Assessor's Office, February 11, 1998). The earlier surrounding land uses were probably dominated by agricultural activities. A recent site visit and aerial photo show the project site to be bordered on two sides by agricultural land used for row -crops and orchards. Over the intervening years, residential development has progressed in the vicinity of the project site so that currently there is a mixture of rural and urban density residential development as well as continued agricultural activities. The uses of the site have apparently been compatible with the neighbors over a period of approximately 38 years. Replacing older structures and expanding the mini storage use is determined to be compatible with both existing and future planned land uses for the area. Mitigation: None required. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 4 Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 Potentially Significant Impact 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? 0 Potentially X Significant Less Unless Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact X X X Response: Approval of the project will not be growth inducing, nor displace any existing Housing. The project is a long time established commercial business in an area consisting of a mixture of rural and urban residences and agricultural activities— Replacing some of the older facilities with newer structures which meet current building codes will enhance the health and safety of the public which uses these facilities. Expanding the mini storage use with additional storage will not induce additional growth, but rather meet the current market demands and potential growth expected in this area. Mitigation: None required. 3. GEOPHYSICAL. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Seismicity: fault rupture? b) Seismicity: ground shaking/ liquefaction? c) Seismicity: seiche? d) Landslides or mudslides? e) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill? f) Subsidence of the land? g) Expansive soils? .h) Unique geologic or physical features? Response: The project is not located in a specific fault zone. All of Butte County is located in Seismic 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division ❑ X X X X X X X X Response: The project is not located in a specific fault zone. All of Butte County is located in Seismic 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division ❑ 0 Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact Zone 3 (Uniform Building Code (UBC), Vol 2, Figure 16-2, 1994). Construction of residences must meet the criteria selection requirements of the UBC. Expansive soil potentia/ for the project site is high. Implementation of appropriate building measures which comply with the Uniform Building Code will adequately address any potential impact. There are no known unique geologic or physical features on the project site (Site Visit, Butte County Constraints Map). Mitigation: None required. 4. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? 0 Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavation? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? h) Impacts to groundwater quality? X X X X X X X X Response: The expansion of additional storage facilities with paving, as described in the application, may affect drainage patterns and increase the amount and rate of surface runoff. There is a porton of the Shasta Union Drainage Assessment District drainage system located onsite in an underground culvert along the western border of the property. The system was installed in 1964. At that time the property site consisted of only one storage facility and a single family residence. The contract engineer for the assessment district attributed the site with a residenfial classification for purposes of calculating runoff and capacity figures for the system. The drainage system may not be adequately ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 11 0 Use Permit for Cathy. & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact sized to meet any increased runoff resulting from additional impervious coverages on the property. The Department of Public Works is requiring, as a condition of approval, that a Drainage Plan which provides for a permanent solution for drainage issues be provided. The applicant maybe required to have an engineer provide necessary data/documentation in order to provide a pemanent solution for drainage. Such a condfion will adequately address any potentially significant impacts. (Applicant's Site Plan; pens comm. with Stuart Edell, Land Development Manager, February 11, 1998) Mitigation: None required. 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? X b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? X c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? X d) Create objectionable odors? X Response: Approval of the project is not going to significantly impact the air quality of the area. There are no sensitive receptors located in the project vicinity. (Site Visit) Mitigation: None required. 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses d) Insufficient parking capacity onsite/ offsite? e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? X X X X ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 7 0 Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 Potentially Significant Impact f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? h) Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including public transportation services? • Potentially Significant Less Unless Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact X X X Response: Approval of the project does not have the potential to significantly impact traffic on Eaton Road or any nearby collector streets. There is very good line -of -sight distancing along Eaton Avenue from the access/egress point on the project site. Traffic volumes in and out of the site may increase incrementally, but any increase will not significantly impact Eaton Road or the intemal circulation within the project site. The manner and nature of traffic in a mini storage facility, after the storage unit has been rented, is infrequent and sporadic. Typically, renters store their possessions for months on end without returning to the unit. The type of project is a low traffic generator. Additionally, the facility will most likely serve residents living in the area, reducing trips to other mini -storage facilities. Mitigation: None required. 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? Response: Approval of the project will not impact any rare, threatened or endangered species (Butte County Constraints Map). There are no natural communities such as an oak forest or heritage quality trees onsite. Staff walked the site and found no evidence of wetland habitat, riparian vegetation, or vernal pools (Site Visit). Mitigation: None required. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 8 • Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? c) Conflict with the extraction of identified, significant mineral resources? • Potentially Significant Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact X X X Response: Approval of this project will not conflict with any adopted energy conservation plans. A minimal amount of non-renewable resources will be expended in the construction of the facilities and parking features. The amount used up is typical and of insignificant quantities. Mitigation: None required. 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) X b) Possible. interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? X d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? X e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? X Response: Approval of the project will not result in the creation of any known health hazards. The project involves the replacement of older structures that may or may not meet current building codes. The project also involves the expansion of storage facilities with the construction of additional buildings. Both aspects of the project will have to meet current Unifoim Building Code requirements. To some extent, modernizing the site's buildings will reduce potential safety hazards related to older buildings. Mitigation: None required. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 • i Use Perniit for Cathy & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 I 10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? • ., Potentially Significant Less Potentially Unless . Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact X X Response: Approval of the project will not result in any substantial increase in noise levels. The construction of the additional buildings and the replacement of the older structures will result in temporary increases in noise associated with such work. The long term effects of the project will result in very minimal incremental increases in noise that will be less than significant. Mitigation: None required. u 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? X b) Police protection? X c) Schools? X d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X e) Other governmental services? X Response: The project is located in an area with low fire hazard potential. A CDF fire station is located approximately one mile away, Station #42, on the comer of Frontier Circle/Cohasset Road. A request for comments from CDF resulted in a response indicating there were no requirements. Approval of the project will not result in any substantial needs for additional public services beyond what the general area requires at present. Mitigation: None required. 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? b) Communications systems? X X ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division 0 10 • Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage? f) Solid waste disposal? g) Special Districts? • Potentially Significant Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact X X— X X X Response: Approval of the project will not result in the need for new systems. The site is currently serviced by three active onsite wells and two active onsite septic systems. The applicant will have to meet Environmental Health requirements for septic systems. This requires, as a condition of approval, to abandon one well and septic tank under County permit. A paved area for the new buildings will create an impervious surface for storm water runoff. The parcel, 3.65 acres, is currently serviced by an underground drainage system that is part of Shasta Union Drainage Assessment District. There is some question whether the system can handle additional runoff with the new impervious coverage. The applicant, as a condition of approval, will have to provide a Drainage Plan which addresses this issue to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Mitigation: None required. 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal. - a) Affect a scenic vista or designated scenic highway?, X b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? X c) Create light or glare? I X Response: Approval of the project will not demonstrably affect any scenic vista nor have any negative aesthetic effect. As a condition of approval, the commercial site will be required to submit Landscape Plan subject to approval by the Department of Development Services. The mini storage will not be open to the public at night. The applicant has stated no new lights will be necessary as no lights for operation for night activities will be needed. Currently, there are security lights in the area of the gate and elsewhere onsite. However, in the event the applicant may want to place additional lights on the expanded facilities, for security reasons or otherwise, and because of the potential for future parcel development on neighboring properties, an appropriate mitigation measure should be recommended to address any future potential impacts. MIl1GATION #1: All outside lighting fixtures shall utilize 'low spillover" design where all direct lighting shall remain on site, allowing only reflective lighting to spillover into those areas off site. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 11 • Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 Potentially Significant Impact 1.4. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal. a) Disturb paleontological resources? b) Disturb archaeological resources? c) Affect historical resources? d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? • Potentially Significant Less Unless Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact X X X X e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? IX Response: The project site is located in an area identified as having high archaeological value (Butte County Constraints Map). However, the 3.6 acre parcel has been heavily used over a period dating back to at least 1960. The majority of the surface is, or is proposed to be, covered by mini storage facilities, two residences, and accessory structures. No surface evidence of archaeological value exists due to the long term intensive use and overcovering of the property. Any subsurface cultural resources that may exist are either permanently covered by existing structures. The location of the proposed new structures include an area that was once occupied by the original house which has long since been removed. The second area of the proposed construction of new facilities is in an area which has been used for years for outdoor storage of boats, recreational vehicles and an assortment of other vehicles. It is possible in the course of grading and laying the foundation that subsurface archaeological artifacts may be uncovered. An appropriate mitigation measure will adequately address such a potential impact. MITIGATION #2: During construction, should any archaeological artifacts be discovered, the Planning Division shall be notified immediately, and all work shall cease until a qualified archaeologist has examined the artifacts and the site and submitted his or her findings to the Planning Division, and recommended clearance to continue. Recommencement of construction shall be upon the approval of the Planning Division. 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreation facilities? X b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? X Response: Approval of the project will not increase the demand for recreational facilities. The type of project is not growth inducing. No demand for additional housing and increased population will result from approval of the project. Mitigation: None required. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 12 Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 Potentially Significant Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). X c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human being, either directly or indirectly? X Response: As discussed in Section IV of this document, with appropriate mitigations in place, this project will not significantly degrade the quality of the environment. Potential impacts from light & glare and to any archaeological resources is addressed with an appropriate mitigation measures in Items #13 & 14. The proposal will not have any significant cumulative impact on the environment. MITIGATION: See Mitigations #1 & 2. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 13 Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 V. MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: MITIGATION #1: All outside lighting fixtures shall utilize 'low spillover" design where all direct lighting shall remain onsite, allowing only reflective lighting to spillover into those areas off site. MITIGATION #2: During construction, should any archaeological artifacts be discovered, the Planning Division shall be notified immediately, and all work shall cease until a qualified archaeologist has examined the artifacts and the site and submitted his or her findings to the Planning Division, and recommended clearance to -continue. Recommencement of construction shall be upon the approval of the Planning Division. lI ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ i 14 Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 DATA SHEET A. Proiect Description 1. Type of Project: Use Permit 2: Proposed Density of Development: n/a 3. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: significant, approximately 33%+ of site 4. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Eaton Road 5. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic system 6. Source of Water Supply: Individual well 7. Proximity of Power Lines: To property 8. Potential for further land divisions and development: the zoning allows for parceling the 3.6 acre site. The Nitrate Action Plan would limit any land division to 1 acre minimums for those parcels on septic systems. B. Environmental Settin 1. Terrain a General Topographic Character: level, paved, graveled, some natural trees and shrubs on borders of parcel, with non-native species in family area at back of parcel; b. Slopes: 0-2% with a western aspect. C. Elevation: 180 feet above sea level. d. Limiting Factors: none 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics: Vina clay loam adobe b. Limiting Factors: limited infiltration, drains well 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. b. Erosion Potential: low C. Landslide Potential: none d. Fire Hazard: low e. Expansive Soil Potential: moderate 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water: none b. Ground Water: Unknown C. Drainage Characteristics: to west/southwest d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 22-24 inches per year: e. Limiting Factors: none 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. 7. Air Quality: Good, except when stagnant air conditions persist in the valley. 8. Vegetation: variety of trees and shrubs typical for rural/urban residential areas of valley 9. Wildlife Habitat: Small birds and animals common to valley grasslands. 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: High Sensitivity area. 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Low Density Residential 12. Existing Zoning: SR 13. Existing Land Use on-site: developed - one single wide mobile home, one double wide mobile home, four storage buildings, 22 storage boxes, three wells, two septic systems 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: agricultural uses - row crops, orchards; rural residential; urban residential b. Zoning: SR, R-1, R-2, P -Q C. Gen. Plan Designation: Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Public d. Parcel Sizes: 1 to 40+ acres ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 15 • Use Permit for Cathy & Harry Webster, File # UP 98-12 • 15. Character of Site and Area: developed, rural and urban residential development; agricultural 16. Nearest Urban Area: Chico 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: Chico Urban Area 18. Improvement Standards Urban Area: none 19. Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Station number 42 approximately 1 mile away. b. Water Availability: Fire tankers only. 20. Schools: Union School District(s). CUSD ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1. Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2. Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1. Safety Element. Oroville,' CA CH2M Hill, 1977. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2. Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department.. Noise Element Map IV -1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1. Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4. Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Map. Oroville, CA. 11. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency, State of California, 1983. 12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1989. 14. USGS Quad Maps. 15. Soil Map. Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 16. Soil Survey of Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 17. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ iR BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on Thursday, April 23, 1998, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following item: i ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MITIGATION MEASURES REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS HAVE BEEN RECOMMENDED 1 9:00 a.m. - Cathy and H Webster - Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business on property zoned S -R (Suburban Residential) located on the south side of Eaton Road, approximately 600 feet west of Morseman Avenue, at 725 Eaton road, identified as AP 007-210-060, Chico. (SH) (UP98-12) The above mentioned application, Initial Study, and map are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Development Services Department, Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. For information call: (530) 538-7601 (Monday through Thursday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) Comments may be submitted in writing at any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION THOMAS A. PARILO, DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Friday, April 3, 1998. March 25, 1998 Cathy and Harry Webster 725 Eaton Rd. Chico, CA 95973 RE: Use Permit, UP 98-12 AP#007-210-060 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Webster:: LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 The Butte County Planning Division has completed the initial study of potential environmental consequences anticipated in connection with the above-mentioned project, a copy of which is enclosed. Please review the enclosed checklist, noting particularly any environmental problems which could be minimized or avoided by the care and manner in which the project is carried out. Also, please review any recommended mitigation measures. After reviewing the checklist, you may see ways to improve the project design. Design improvements to minimized problems are encouraged. If you note any errors or omissions in our evaluation, please bring them to our attention. We request any comments to be made within 14 days of this letter. You will be notified of the time and place of the public hearing for your project. If you have any questions regarding environmental review, please contact this office between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, �2 7� Steve Hackney Associate Planner SH\tb encl. LEAD - IN SHEET FILE NO: UP 98-12 AP# ©O r(- 2 \ O - O (o p { APPLICANT: Cathy and Harry Webster, 725 Eaton Rd., Chico, CA 95973 Name Address OWNER: Carmon A. Michael, 116 Tuscaloosa Ave., Atherton, CA 94027 Name Address RESPRESENTATIVE: Name IAddress REQUEST: Se_ IP�ervyA -gar G o,^ �\X Pat n Sron o� 4 i�Y1-�—��/m� ?. � - J UJ N�; �A,1F1�K\o��3 �7�o�t�c 1 Ulf- 4T iw. I&W GA1111ew.4Vh' "i �T �svl�uw�c SIZE: 5 A c- SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT # 3 EXISTING ZONING: .l�P, ZONING HISTORY: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ` APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: k:\forms\lead-in Planning Division NOV 0 3 1957 ®roville, California ij w •� r � y3 � �� Cp�� t� � S COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST APPLICATION: Cathy and Harry Webster DATE: November 3, 1997 _ PG&E South - Oroville County Offices and Cities: State Agencies Community Association CalTrans (Traffic) _ Chief Administrative Officer V X_ Environmental Health Sheriff _ Develop. Services Director BCAG LAFCo _ APCD _ Biggs _ Gridley Oroville _ Paradise Irrigation District: . Butte Water OWID Table Mountain Irrigation Domestic Water _ Butte Water District OWID Sewer Biggs/W. Gridley Water Paradise Irrigation Thennalito Irrigation Public Works Director Building Manager ALUC Butte Co. Farm Bureau Chico Chico Airport Commission _X_ Agricultural Commission Durham Irrigation Richvale Irrigation Other _ California Water Service Co. _ Del Oro Water Co. Thennalito Irrigation District _ Other Butte Water District _ Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) _ ire Protection _X_ California Department of Forestry _ Recreation" Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Paradise Recreation & Park Utilities Themalito Irrigation L.O.A. PUD EI Medio Fire Protection District Durham Area Recreation Richvale Recreation & Parks PG&E North - Chico _ Chambers Cable TV _ _ PG&E South - Oroville Viacom Cable TV State Agencies Community Association CalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept of Water Resources Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter) _ Dept of Parks and Rec. _ Central Reg, Water Duality Cont _ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program Department of Conservation Of. of Mining Reclamation DeptSocial Services, Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies Sterling City Sewer Main Feather River Rec. & Park Pacific Bell Dept of Fish and Game Highway Patrol Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management _ US Fish & Wildlife Service _ Army Corps of Engineers Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. Lime Saddle Dist _ Community Association _ Drainage _ Butte Env.l Council Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society _ Butte Co. Mining Committee _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _ Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancy_ School Districts Mosq. Abatement Oroville/Butte Co Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. i FTT-FE- M-2 A-40 R-2 P-Q -I S-R S • -2 MHP -3 MHP 3 MHP �� u. 0 --sod Volvo" g Il \ ��`� e • as .nowt � %A IZD %A Q2 .S2 W > N� — NAW Z fo cis c) C) 0) MO 1311.. Nt k". Q Op C:) irk C ......................... Q6 & I Vj oo b r-(- I I c C 2S5• 7* -5'' umRIM co %A IZD %A Q2 .S2 W umRIM co %A IZD %A .S2 W > N� — 5 cis c) C) 0) MO 1311.. umRIM co %A r— %A .S2 W > N� — 5 cis c) C) 0) .Q paopo",Fo -,TORI. Q Op C:) irk C ......................... Q6 0 �10 0. V) umRIM co %A r— %A .S2 W > N� — 5 cis c) C) 0) .Q paopo",Fo -,TORI. Op C:) irk C ......................... Q6 umRIM co %A r— %A .S2 W > N� — 5 cis c) C) 0) .Q paopo",Fo -,TORI. Op C:) > C V 0 �10 0. umRIM C co 0 r— CC"" .S2 p > N� — 5 cis c) C) 0) IL paopo",Fo -,TORI. Op C:) > C 0 �10 C co 0 r— CC"" .S2 p > N� — 5 cis c) C) 0) C= C:) > C 0 ANCHOR INN STORAGE 725 Eaton Road Chico, CA 95973 (530) 342-2996 Steve Hackney, Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Steve, I want to let you know that in relation to the Use Permit we are applying for to replace old construction and to build new storage structures, we do plan to discontinue outside storage of vehicles. In our phased construction plan, the rental space for various automobiles and recreational vehicles will be replaced with a storage structure. Thanks for your help. If you have any more questions or information, please call us. Cathy and Harry Webster, Managers/Agents Anchor Inn Storage Planning Department JAN: 0 5.1997 Orov6:: ' e �: •,t lr�•»'•'�$�T-"scl�•.>y `2 }'� ;: ;:%7,�,� i7'/Yf+,\ +�k''��,Y'''a�rt��fi�•n��y? +r.yy� y,� < <-;�{rF � � •„I t't' r,{!► ,/•r ,`;a, �y:�� •�• '•.. `y, yY,( �.� /,s,/r'•�jj '4 +'.:.'r+•_ .,,,t:' v��v '• + •; �\ �:�. `11.�n.\€t'1• FI 1 i= Y r,4 r ,� �_ C '> '''>Y'=t1'r: ;f„ ; •z •:• •2. 4 r..r it Y¢'r'y'.f''ci..:: ...r{."i\ f,,-i„;4't. ;.. r j `. .i } i�\. y. 't1} >, : {,..,. �\-„.,�j'{. 7 . -: \ i 0. ..�.. c•S'+:;r. rt v,.ht. ,T � „w� c lf �, , } •, l.cr t. ,;.r .• >.. i-'s"< . •J� •�;. : . �Tr,,.. qtr"- ; ,r. , �t.G ik t�.t ".h:a :', f.! r3 /t •P iA: x a� . ,:_"b l• !, r n.•i ..;c'� ?+: x3Y:}; :•}'rtr:i •�:w1. ,.' / S 1 r }(CLQ.�!lYiS,v.. rt:.'v,: 5�•}'yam!•, r,�'y,.r,! •} C vl t ,t— I� �'!�� :ry -:i ,•F+`��_'4:� •: -i ,�"•!d, !.{ •,: � •y ♦ :>' G a • •:>` `X2,v,'}, i•rr:•Yf^' ,}: ;i/ ^ rh•^�” ,x.. � :Y.Y,.. ♦�(';{ /..; Jlrf +•. c i:� :1jyY ;y ,! �`` e � r'. s C• b�. {. .}�, .�lyt. ,,c.\,�.1;\J, ;p$�` ,3 \ • �' ,irYi./ �+ •r ,y r •.%: ! '' r 4 1• •: t. ••. N. 3 �.A�♦. ;i�8r:'?M ' .+?;.:; {!)'jf::•rp\ O;S i.rr•): `Y• ,, .1�?4 ::ii j.v- ::: I ' ..y. , 4� t J . ?%fir: `{'i: r'' :;•• ,. �4 .`M''�� }. Ji. j•• ::.: i` ,:, '>. . J f• v: > t t Z� ! /f� R �S. ,.�; , ':k , C 'y�J �:•n '! :��: , s i' ;fir t �p .Y• •,•. !?'ti:.' \. { ,>aY•.jy y.�.i .}:>�:Yl,•' '`Jin}> � •�;�S.,.n } :n.i •'•t':v: :r: ,�.72;i .,<, •'„�,: J T.;. J. •h { , \' :•lir' .'•: N::•:: x:r •>: •w. ii. \gin �� QQ „ p .y Y• , r.' f l 1: c .V :•%n . :vii.•.:. '� !.. :•A r t. J• • 4 r :rYn�� b'}• L y ::y.T'ih;�}-;; •.; Y, �.v>;:('%. {\ ..t.},� : � -f, r,. >. f 'r' i'. ) i t .y:. it i ~?• : Sz•: ••>:- ,C' .}: • . t j. J' :••t: `ter J• n < J Y' y •; 4, a •h t 4. I,Y t A. v r y x.` ln: iY. :r' J i 4 \ 4� 4• i� r;tr }' t ,y . .: f • } .{ ,•�:;.;: rl�r,�,,yy,,•J,i. .,y �., ;,� �' .< r t ^f t 1 fi • '�r '{{:•: Vii! .♦.. 9 .f. •i :.4 V 1, v,? r t :b: ��{ •ri:��'vi♦T:v: : . �•.<- :t ••tii:., :,.. :3 •. r R`•. �' +*� i '.S:• tr �fifi .y • � yS f i. !'• Y i '. Y :.v .r is ..r. ,tii .{:. ':}!:•: !:;Yi :'',• .%: '�•v, -t .. 1 _ `9�0Fy. r'';.,5{�..!•r(•.�.in,.�(/J_.`:i1..�/'fy.•i}%i'':::.�(,��J/.��!�byy:(.ry/r�:�i.�:�:; /. Y.• •!v'•�•.•.,'. I.'{�N'•�"� (: •:•J./•,.••r•.J,'••.•.' ,!:='{ri'.: t ` !•+!W'\r'i; '.k {•� s'rry`�"F:V 7T 'S . <y /`11N�{.'PC :�%� -=Y L +i0`/,t t',\r-1:. "n 7, +, J ..,`•�:, <-. t ,Y:�,L+.f•"!'-"t , r:y.a�„+,��(""�+y,j . -.9 �{•. {.: i'r? h`C � �i,t/ }{:'i'%' �:; "f4, 'S.:' . i + , F�n,;Y�'6?,)i✓' {��?''i':^riii iia M:: •Sv: !" 4'j .';r'. ' { � t d - . r`/ v, '��-80.:,','��', Y ♦ r 9 1� Y �,�L{/. Y 4 t f. Y r v. , J ! !+Q,��y{!� ,� �'' `•V�!�}': ,.fLJr r• v i', t v ''� � f t�, t -' • , } ; it�'Yis,.4'Y. � 1.. > Y:.• j' ':•'r,'• '1� ' -'JY .vi.. �'' < /" f t. � t � .�,� .u•'/2:rf:i••\ii �'•ti},�:•}{: j�9'? � }{.4}': �rl�✓}{TY;Y.l.9, v . , .Y f .. r�il}y,,� �:j��t�+r •ify^��+5::>�'�''/i � � r• `::f?:! ,?.y,:.t,.�}, :.� .: C •�{'%� �k'� '� �y � t ,.1 rc�S,, '!?,i.'>i,!.,ti.!r �' 7.v: "• .:?'• 4jJi t •$y }47•{. ''%.j,.' . l , / ^':' \, YJ c, '"Y% !:'.y;<: {J.�:: .,`•�}, r�, ./ ggp J! Jj i► C + '1{r t- '-1. ,:{'• .f it � +•%i'' ,:!'• ': �;:. •• `>,.y} : ={>t �:,� r ., :•f:� ; nJ•.• . } t � .: �� ti � r i ., {•;: .F•1'!/j{�. :�G,- :7 i'r:..:br '•}yr' :`f`•�<.. 4 t. , ,y. +, r -:.: i .•�.✓ .w • / . • r •.>.: '>< \:' `fir;' t Jr�f�. vr• •i,l,.; .. Si�Y:y.';{:: %}; :Jf.��t��y� +v:,.!::'� / ,.. -:ri 1 :r' :/r J �:.. r . ?Vt i p�/. 1 •: 1. '\''' �. i?C• •. i7i'� J.yi.••;: vX•. � . d Y•r• 'v'r' 4. ! S , yJ� •.iY'� v: T N•: r} ,. { I I h• - J i X 'M<v •. Kms. 7 v r. Y✓ iti:� , l• h✓'� i i• �'O i �i•. , r. r. s i •/ t } • 5: t r •` r .r nv+', Y.. •.J s. Jy � -'•N. - r / :•M A., r:r: •rr.. rY•. :?{ : rr . /' `iii 11 .9:•}:'. •, r, .. i }' x:v:: r. is ' •l n ;r ,\,�� r. r J. ,r '•:CY : \ .J •: r• v •rJ A, J::• �( s , •w, :v,tn :.• : ',ri•.::'s'i•:�i: •!4'' +..:. •x,AJY;,..:, ;.,,;!Y.l�r:} N , • ;• r t ' r •! 'IVT. {.. i / ,.yi: •.//• . •!r j Iv•y[ ' i •}� , ' � { - r. i r s '3x •. i�:• a � !. •:y !'' iii,:•:. :'4 i(�•ys y .j"•r r •6 r .r. i•Y .J. 7J ,� [[,./p{.: :'�r.i {': !. . a, �,'Jr'% �y�� : �+L ':N ',fr ''1 e. 4- • s �rt.;� i.'T.. ii: �'?!f� :.+h•'j{C•fi: - i/%• • ,.Yi f�: .i • r . c r• S: 1 :.}:,: ' :'/' •+/• ij.: •.{: , X: T,...i;: '•.ir•%: o.,.tq �f! t 5, .lJ.,.• / r f• t c r , r r. ,�/:!! 4 .J:':!, / i .,, r. ' ., !:'%�::�::U.•/.:JJJ :$; �,v:,i•; J• G, :`, �I. s. r/ •W .nr -./.� Jr.�• f.';�. ./ ..ver. :,{'!.:• .{.. �i�:; ;{;.f. .f•. �.,,,?n ./, a .i:. ,A!/..!'>; 4 . {.. > ..l.•:Y i'/.. •'%I % I A • Jn++: �., .: r}:'T�� /l''::{'•i%Ty I r}:• i J:. { ,. , . , i/} ! ! {1;' • .; ••,••;,;: r•"•• :.;v;..;v,'.y >i •{;: ..;; i �.; i1� .: •' .y ..' '• !`•sdr ,, : r •>i:.,Q;:'-'.;+,G.; S ?w .t�/�i .<✓I!!- j., l;: •, y':':�J.� :':v nt !.r.;S'/./:. Jy' ,/'!}4?..i:j5.'•/,! ar;1/JrA'?::' ++ii:,:•:,y3 'v` .'y 7 r {/. 'i✓.�"�' •'r!• 1 '"yr•+�J• `, ,r«la ?• •:i •t:' / -�✓/f ?:%, rl.•>✓' F/ :Lli:{y.� / ,i -}rlY; f .. s '. ,. r:K %r iT; �. -yl�'9/ r r• as �4 ffatte co, LAN D OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY { - �-> PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ..,, 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA April 23, 1998 TIME: 9:00 a.m. PLACE: Board of Supervisors' Room County Administration Center 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ROLL CALL - Commissioners Nelson, Cage, Leland, Mooney, and Chairman Lambert. III. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA Commission members and staff may request additions, deletions, or changes in the Agenda order. IV. MINUTES - Approval of the minutes for April 9, 1998. V. CONSENT Consent items are set for approval in one motion. These items are considered non- controversial. No presentations will be made, however, some questions may be asked. The Chair will ask if any commissioner or member of the public wishes to pull a consent item for discussion. Brief questions may be asked on any item. 9:00 a.m. Staff Recommendation - Approval Ronald Harue - a minor variance request to allow the expansion of a house located within the 20 foot front yard setback on property zoned Unclassified on the north side of Forbestown Road, approximately 1,400 feet west of Bamford Way, at 5899 Forbestown Road, Forbestown, identified as AP 073-190-012. (SB) (MVAR 98-01) VI. BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR ON ITEMS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA (Presentations will be limited to five minutes. The Planning Commission is prohibited by State Law from taking action on any item presented if it is not listed on the Agenda) BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 23, 1998 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS The Chair will call for staff comments. The hearing will be opened to the public for proponents, opponents, comments, and rebuttals. The hearing will be closed to the public and discussion confined to the Commission. The Commission will then make a motion and vote on the item. It is requested that public initiated presentations be limited to a maximum of 5 minutes so that all interested parties will have an opportunity to address the Commission. Following your presentation, please print your name and address on the speakers sheet so that the record will be accurate. The recommendation of County staff is indicated below. It is only a recommendation and has not yet been considered by the Planning Commission. Copies of the Staff Report are available at the Planning Division Office. A. Staff Recommendation - Approval 9:00 a.m. - Douglas Stocks - proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding environmental impacts and Use Permit to allow a dog kennel for 48 dogs on property zoned A-5 (Agricultural - 5 acre parcels) located on the southeast corner of Palermo- Honcut Highway and Cox Lane, at 86783 Palermo-Honcut Hwy., identified as AP 027-350-197, south of Oroville. (SB) (UP98-16) (VIDEO) B. Staff Recommendation - Approval 9:00 a.m. - Cathy and Harry Webster - proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding environmental impacts and Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business on property zoned S -R (Suburban Residential) located on the south side of Eaton Road, approximately 600 feet west of Morseman Avenue, at 725 Eaton road, identified as AP 007-210-060, Chico. (SH) (UP98-12) (VIDEO) VIII. GENERAL BUSINESS This section of the agenda is to be utilized by the Planning Commission and Director of Development Services on items of interest, general discussion, or items for which staff has been directed to do research and -bring back to the Commission. Items A, B, & C may not always be addressed at every hearing, but will always be listed as part of the agenda. A. General Plan/Zoning Ordinance Update B. Legislative Case Law Update C. Planning Commission Concerns IX. ADJOURNMENT J:\WPDOCS\AGENDAS\PCA0423.98 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 23, 1998 (SPACE FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE {nthe Matter c6 0ntioeof Iu��.ic I ` BUTTE COUNTY euwwwmG ---------------------------- COMMISSION NOTICE OF` �014- ----------------'—.------''—. PUBLIC HEARING --- will be held on Thumdq.y,,', 01 ' AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 23, 1998, In the BtMe,tdi Board of SupervJs6i�q%R&`-' 25 un nter" ville, all o !a State of California Comn�yo�8"L� [ �' TIVE GARDING ENVIRONMENTAL The undersigned resident ofthe county uf IMPACTS HAVE BEEN.! OMMENDED Butte, State ufCalifornia, says: 9:00 a.m. - Cathy and Harry ebster - Use Pprmlt�fqlg�!n 'a, expansion of mInI-'stora'- business on property zoned r That lam, and utall time herein mentioned was acitizen c6the United States and not aparty ' ad on the south side of Eaton hnnor interested inthe above entitled matter; '`~ that {unnthe pdncipalclerk mfthe p�nherand °, ' publisher of The above mention tudy, nd_ cation, In--– The ChicoEoherPzioe-0emord/ the Butte County Urov11le Mercury Register. evelop a Services riveInformation " That said newspaper imone nfgeneral ciccu|u' call: (530) 53&7601, tion asdefined hySection 6000Covernrocot (Monday - through Thursday:- —---p.m. ccorn Code of the State ofCalifornia, Case ��o.26796 !nents mayfe' bvthe Superior Court of the Stu'teofCalifornia, ing at any time 'pdor'to the or orally at the me6ting inand for the County nfButte; that said ncwspa' above or as may be coif -'hearing istedtinued to a later date.' It' '6b ' per aLall times herein mentioned was printed challenge the above ap6l -fbons in court, you may be limit-- aodpublished daily inthe City ofChico and ad to raising County ufButte; that the notice ufwhich the you or someone else rised at the descaribed In annexed iaatrue pdntedcopy, was published in ' ~~ ^' written this noticenning spondence delivered .,.to 11:116, said newspaper oothe following days: '^~^~ Commission, at or pri- 6UTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION THOMAS A. PARILO, April 3, 1998. ~' RECTORSERVICES C194967. A Publish: 4/3/1998 lcertify (or dec|ace}'under penalty of —regoiog perjury, that the_(is true and correct, at Chico, California. Duhed--. And1_?L_19K1___________, atChico, Ca\ifnrni � � �`�=��------ quite L'o, L A N D O F N AT U R A L W E A L T H A N D BEAUTY April 2, 1998 Cathy and Harry Webster 725 Eaton Rd. Chico, CA 95973 Re: Use Permit, AP 007-210-060, UP 98-12 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Webster: PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business on the south side of Eaton Road, approximately 600 ft. west of Morseman Ave., at 725 Eaton Road, Chico. Should you have any concerns with the report or conditions of approval, please contact us in advance of the meeting so that we may work together to resolve your concerns. A public hearing has been set for April 23, 1998, at 9:00 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Steve Hackney of this office at 538-7601, between 8:00 a. m. and 4:00 p. m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson P lanning/Administrative Support Service Assistant Enc. j:hvp docs\pc 10schedule. mrg .ti BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: LAFCo' FROM: Butte County Planning Division _ RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Cathy and Harry Webster, UP 98-12 DATE: November 13,1997 CONTACT PERSON: Steve Hackney The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: I 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to f 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business on properly zoned SR (Suburban ResidentiaR located on on the south side of Eaton Road. aonrobmately 600 ft. west of Morseman Ave.. at 725 Eaton Road. Chico, identified as APN 007-210-060. Supervisorial District No. 3. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X PLANNING COMMISSION - _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON March 12 , 1998. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN December 1, 1997. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): i_ 40e47-tD /t✓ 411OP027- 42 -A Oh' INFLU�N� v`I• P(7SS/6C G /C 7- W/ E.9`oN 20A ,-�, /S/2 37 /31/P-IS's �xpq,vsior/� (/✓/ DEN �N 6 � 3. /lClZors G/lon� PRUnos�� w�sT si��' �1 �2 Pow, 49CCEss 172A/NA6 f /N C R EA s'6 l^7s+ -f /Zf_G� V 112 X AM'Dy tug t C -ST -L 7V C 5A'3 211 2 5 9 P2 OP 21$ //-7 PL f' 4-p 0,-d 5;. AOr CDr'1PAT-idRLr-' W/ C/TY CJ)C CRICU 6,C_rJf-itAL Pc9� fi P2�Zv,.tE. L By: f - V( vi -s Date: ci 7 /� III IlJ 01111sl n 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-77,85. 0L L 0 010ville, California BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Building Manager FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Cathy and Harry Webster, UP 98-1f DATE: November 13,1997 CONTACT PERSON: Steve Hackney The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: I 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business on property zoned SR (Suburban Residential) located on on the south side of Eaton Road. approbmately 600 ft. west of Morseman Ave.. at 725 Eaton Road. Chico, identified as APN 007-210-060. Supervisorial District No. 3. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X PLANNING COMMISSION - _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON March 12 , 1998. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN December 1, 1997. ff no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): S6L Planning Division 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 APPLICANT: applicant DATE: November 3, 1997 AGENT: APN: 007-210-060 FILE M UP 98-12 PLANNER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS H. BUILDING PERMITS 1. Prior to building permit issuance for a new residential dwelling unit(s), the applicant shall pay all applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time of acceptance of the application. Such fees, shall include, but not be limited to: Park Fee, School Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, and Fire Protection Fees. I I 2. Prior to building permit issuance for a new commercial or industrial development, or addition to 'an wdsting development, the applicant shall pay all applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time of acceptance of the application. Such fees shall include, but not be limited to: School Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, and Fire Protection Fees. I� EXISTING STRUCTURES 1 . Comply with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, / area and fire -resistiveness of existing buildings. V 2. E)dsting building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for thc.intended new use of the building(s) or the existing building(s) shall be demolished. ' 8ul1, a IIJ 6 PC?-AW1;'5 v1 44AI.5 sg#kC AAED 13f,* A D6flaAl ��2o�Essro�J�+c. �I C seo 0�2 RZ6t s7-a2eiO to Environmental Health BUTTE COUNTY NOV,— 4 1997 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CIlIQO PLANNING DIVISION , Callfomld TO: Environmental -Health FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application:Cathy and'Ha�ry Webster; UP 98= 1 V14 DATE: November 3,1997 CONTACT PERSON: The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: I 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to i 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard -at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business on property zoned SR (Suburban Residential) located on on the south side of Eaton Road. approximately 600 ft. west of Morseman Ave.. at 725 Eaton Road. Chico, identified as APN 007-210-060. Supervisorial District No. 3. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X PLANNING COMMISSION - _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON March 12, 1998. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN November 17,1997. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): Planning Qv/1gigil 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785 NOV 2U1997 Owwoe" ca$#s, s-1 r;' • BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Public Work �.3 FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Cathy and Harry Webster, UP 98-12 DATE: November 3,1997 CONTACT PERSON: The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: I 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business on property zoned SR (Suburban Residential] located on on the south side of Eaton Road. approximately 600 ft. west of Morseman Ave.. at 725 Eaton Road. Chico, identified as APN 007-210-060. Supervisorial District No. 3. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - _DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON March 12, 1998. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN _November 17, 1997. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): '�u aiikiu� / v.�lw Gl/r.✓.�f CtT�wi+w..fi arsl.� . By: Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7Mnning Division N 0 V 0 6 1997 Oroville, California BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Cathy and Harry Webster DATE: November 3, 1997 AGENT: APN: 007-210-060 ' FILE #: UP 98-12 PLANNER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for.an expansion of a mini -storage business? Those items checked are conditions of approval. j PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS A. STREETS I 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits obtain encroachment permit for all new or existing driveway approaches and construct them to County standards, as specified in County Improvement Standards. C 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits deed to Butte County, in fee simple, 40 feet of right-of-way from the centerline of /mow . The right of way shall be sufficient for the installation of standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits submit road and drainage improvement plans for the installation and construction ofstreet frontage improvements on zr14Tv-/ jlorv-n to ?J -r st n ar� including but not limited to P.C.C. curb, gutter and sidewalk and the required street section, less. Construct or install the required improvements. 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits dedicate a one foot "no access strip" or relinquish abutters rights to Butte County, along the frontage of parcels except at approved access points. B. DRAINAGE �G 1. Prior to the recordation of the issuance of building permits a plan for a permanent solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public ov Works. The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters shall be detainedoonn site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits establish 100 year floodplain elevations and the lowest floor elevations for any structures. Show on the site plan map for building permits the elevations (by .contours) and the location of an accepted NVGD benchmark and a temporary benchmark on-site. C. LEGAL LOT STATUS 1. Prior to the issuance of the Use Permit, prove, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works, that the parcel of the subject application is a legal parcel. TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Ll • BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION City of Chico? Butte County Planning Division Request for Comments on a Development Application: Cathy and Harry Webster, UP 98-12� November 13,1997 CONTACT PERSON: Steve Hackney The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business on property zoned SR (Suburban Residential) located on on the south side of Eaton Road. approbmately 600 ft. west of Morseman Ave - at 725 Eaton Road. Chico, identified as APN 007-210-060. Supervisorial District No. 3. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) PLANNING COMMISSION - _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON March 12 , 1998. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN December 1, 1997. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): The proposed expansion of the non -conforming mini -storage warehouse is not consistent with the uses anticipated and encouraged by the City of Chico Diagram land use designation of Low Density Residential. The site is also prezoned (P) R-1 Single Family Residential Zoning District which does not allow mini -storage warehouses. Further expansion of the propose non -conforming use is inappropriate and the use permit should be denied based on inconsistency with both the Butte County and.City of Chico Genera. Pans. P-1211111illy Mision NOV 2 r i. - +7 J r of By: Date: 11/20/97 Ed Palmeri, Senior Panner 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: California Department of Forestry FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Cathy and Harry Webster, UP 98-12' y. DATE: November 13,1997 CONTACT PERSON: Steve Hackney The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business on property zoned SR (Suburban Residential) located on on the south side of Eaton Road. approbmately 600 ft. west of Morseman Ave.. at 725 Eaton Road. Chico, identified as APN 007-210-060. Supervisorial District No. 3. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X PLANNING COMMISSION - _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON March 12 , 1998. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN December 1, 1997. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional ages' necessary): yt.a Planning ElMsi®n 2 1997 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 ®roville, California • 171879 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES •ry PLANNING DIVISIONR ti TO: Agricultural Commission; CID 0 FROM: Butte County Planning Division Aj� RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Cathy and Harry Webste ,'' 98-12 DATE: November 13,1997 CONTACT PERSON:'Steve Hackne ZI LEO 60 The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business on property zoned SR (Suburban Residential) located on on the south side of Eaton Road. appro)dmately 600 ft. west of Morseman Ave.. at 725 Eaton Road. Chico, identified as APN 007-210-060. Supervisorial District No. 3. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) PLANNING COMMISSION - _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON March 12 , 1998. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN December 1, 1997. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): Icy --mulull m7 Z�i'erc� �l� L Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Cathy and Harry Webster, UP 98-12 DATE: November 13,1997 CONTACT PERSON: Steve Hackney The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if.the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business on property zoned SB (Suburban Residential) located on on the south side of Eaton Road. approbmately 600 ft. west of Morseman Ave.. at 725 Eaton Road. Chico, identified as APN 007-210-060. Supervisorial District No. 3. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X PLANNING COMMISSION - _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON March 12 , 1998. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN December 1, 1997. If no comments or communications are received by the above date,the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 0 APPLICANT: Cathy and Harry Webster AGENT: FILE #: UP 98-12 . DATE: November 3, 1997 APN: 007-210-060 PLANNER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for an expansion of a mini -storage business Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS J. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit B" and dated _, 19_ and is incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the plans, incorporating all applicable conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division to verify compliance with said conditions of approval. 3. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high solid masonry wall with view obstructing gates and a solid or semi -open shade cover. Plans to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to construction. 4. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, pursuant to this permit, conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 5. All electrical and mechanical equipment, including but not limited to air conditioning units, electrical boxes, transformers, and backflow preventers, shall be screened from public view. Screening shall be to the satisfaction of the Planning Division and in compliance with the Building Division. K. LANDSCAPING 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan consistent with the project site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. A plan of the existing on-site mature trees, located in any area proposed for buildings and vehicular access, shall be provided to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits and/or prior to grading or vegetation removal. The applicant shall minimize the removal of mature trees, where possible. A mature tree shall be defined as a tree with a trunk measuring 4 inches in diameter, 4 feet from ground level. Mature trees removed shall be replaced by planting replacement trees of equal number and • 0 not less than _ gallon size. 3. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris, during the term of this permit. 4. All graded slopes, over 5 feet in height, or on slopes greater than _%, shall be seeded, planted, mulched or hydroseeded or otherwise protected to prevent erosion. A permanent irrigation system shall be installed for non-native vegetation. A one year Faithful Performance bond shall be posted to guarantee installation and established growth. 5. In parking lots of commercial and industrial development, trees of not less than. 15 gallon size shall be provided to reduce heat gain from the paved surface and to soften the visual impact of the paved area. Such trees shall be planted at a minimum density of one tree every three parking spaces. Tree species shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to planting. 6. Prior to the commencement of grading and/or construction activity, all individual or groups of oak trees which are to be retained as part of the project, shall be fully protected through the use of root protection zones (RPZ). During construction, RPZs shall be established using protective fencing enclosing an area with a radius 1.5 times the distance from the trunk to the dripline. Wdhin this protective buffer, no grading, trenching, fill, or vegetation alteration of any kind shall be allowed. The RPZs shall be maintained after the completion of construction in order to continue to protect the oak trees, but the fencing shall be removed. L. GRADING 1. During construction, should any archaeological artifacts be discovered, the Planning Division shall be notified immediately, and all work shall cease until a qualified archaeologist has examined the artifacts and the site and submitted his or her findings to the Planning Division, and recommended clearance to continue. Recommencement of construction shall be upon the approval of the Planning Division. Archaeological artifacts are defined as follows: 2. Prior to any clearing, grading and/or construction in a Federal or State identified 100 year floodplain and/or streambed the following entitlements must be obtained: a California Fish and Game 1604 Streambed Alteration permit and an Army Corps 404 permit or exemption certificate. M. ADDITIONAL APPROVALS 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits payment of the North Oroville/Thermalito Traffic Impact Fees shall be made. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for each new or additional living unit the applicant shall execute the Oroville Area Traffic Mitigation Fee Agreement and pay the established fee. _ 3. Prior to the issuance of the Use Permit, to insure the maintenance and continuance of the orchard or other agricultural use of the property, the property owner shall enter into the County approved Orchard Management Agreement. The agreement shall terminate in 10 years or upon a rezoning of the parcel/lot to a zone other than A-5 through A-160. The agreement shall be recorded and recording fees paid by the applicant. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable State and County laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit application. 5. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at the end of which time it shall expire (unless the approving authority has held a hearing thereon and granted an extension. In connection with such an extension the approving authority may add, change, or delete conditions. 6. Approval of this Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void if the use for which it has been granted is not established within two calendar year from the date of approval. No formal cancellation or revocation action by the County will be necessary. 7. The developer shall display a current County Zoning and County Land Use Map in the sales office at all times, and/or suitable alternatives. 8. Approval of this application does not become effective unless, prior to 4:00 p.m. on _, 199_, the applicant shall sign and file with the Department of Development Services an Indemnity Agreement in a form satisfactory to the County Counsel. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or prior to the issuance of a Use Permit for a Mobile Home Park the Sheriff Facilities Impact Fee shall be paid, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article II of the Butte County Code. The fee amount shall be determined and calculated as of the date of application for building permit. 10. Prior to the issuance of the Use Permit the applicant or property owner shall sign and record the CSA 87 Traffic and Drainage Mitigation Agreement or pay the required fees prior to the issuance of the Use Permit. 11. Prior to the issuance of the Use Permit, the applicant shall contact the Butte County Tax Collector's Office to begin the process of a Transient Occupancy Registration Certificate. A Transient Occupancy Registration Certificate shall be required within ten (10) days after commencing business for a motel, hotel, inn, tourist home, bed and breakfast, rooming house, apartment house, mobile home park, recreational vehicle park, campground, or parking area (See Chapter 23A). 12. Prior to the issuance of the Use Permit, the applicant shall pay all outstanding County fees. . - - DATE �(2� ��OI�Y ;. Gi`"" � � YL AS i rifJO DO.�' _ _�* 7w - e/� [� 1 LJ Q�147--a �y 43.. .pv.o .. oo - 40 - - DATE - RECEIPT TOTAL NO. RECEIVED PUBLIC WORKS LAFCO M USE PERMITS VARIANCES PUBLIC ZONING DOCUMENTS i" - ENV MEA- - _ OTHER PP1L.-a LTM„ .e. C is OFFICIAL RECEIPT .COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING woa=l 03ni SHO. BA R T SUED NWLY. COR. LOT 9 r� HOBA RT SUB M.O.R. BK 4 PG 24 U Assessor's Map No. 07-2/ - n County of Butte, Calif. FEBRUARY 1962 695 OLEANDER AVE. CHICO, CALIFORNIA FI. 34211 '7'a1`0�� Butte County Department of Public H-eolth DIVISION OF SANITATION 2430 e1RDSTREET .. OROVILL'E, CA,LIFORNIA LENOX3EXT Z17Sp tic TankSystem Inspection Certificate c r The Septic JTank System was Installed at _ FOR LEACHING FIELD-» SEPTIC TANK � ' r Length _...» �� ft. Length c; i d. i Width »..._Width, „t.F 3� .s. Water Depth �' ft # No of Lines i4® �W4 I�laterial Rock Under .Tile in he above dimensions meet the minimum requirements, of County Ordinance No. 699 .Additional leaching t , area will be required if experience show's it to b;'necessary. REMARKS: :. � L � f • -11147 t: Date: � r • .j” SANIT RfAN S2-10E1R - F° rlann,,, 01vision FEB 1 21998 oroville, ,rte r«��= � „�;�,--�R�`�-7� `'"r'¢•!� • .,;,Id,E,�, , ,'':"�!� }- ' t , � f �,; ? <• Y, 1, �, of . ..~PlyiYhi ��+� •�R M k r`� .�+�.�;5! ~1r. r 0 ! • Y , - . h .•La 4.4"C'"f��Pa 'wv'r ` ♦ f - �,,,+ / x< � - • i ; {;.= r t of i� «• f " �� ' .P� �1._.: �-=rrf..�'•.,,—. ....akr ` ✓ •—r. „C�"`:.ef1.' ��...-w-,.•S�'�r • 'a� a� r-r:"T�_ •o�,. - - � it . 7 Y ?•• y . -• - +, i , � � � � ""�"� "ti. � : �,'" "sem .. i.• • ' 2 'fit- '- ��' e%, �• '� � i `•. , x } `� . � , tr ,� i � ''A •'� y r 4 art.. . +r l .. ' -�.s -. ., , is T• ., • r r 'a 7 `4i ° y` t �< Mh`�+�'^4�s`F -✓tom .��` _ .f ` \\ 1 f '. i Y 't • �° - .ti t � s, Y f � ':.!:*r-"'' � r �` .. r a � � a vo mop 01 Aw 40 IA f _ r7 rn 1N v _ k 7-7 IMP. m ' � .. •. 'l7 1 , Yom.-{ •Y 41, -•• � T ^ �.'��"'',. , - a # �'' • t ..,t• ', �` y `'i � ;}r �'}a Y� ,4i4 j- � v 7 • -. .Y iS :.. r 6 f y~ ,.7 •il .,i �.sti+•: 31 + i a •• 3. r .'s. 'F .• i1 ate, t � cwt ,x. } •}!, , a COUNTY OF BUTTE OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ..1 t. 02.3.. ; 115774911-0, P08Ta0E b EL accss%s'7 _ 1 c%t s%sL� c:S s%ss%st s STATUS o. AC -CAEE-.:EL. JOHN 3166 GODMAN AVE CA 95973 JAEK166 959731130 1297 16 041'03/98 FORWARD TIME EXP 14TN TO SEND JAEKEL'JO_HN F RD PARADISE CAY95969-6441 i 1 1 F i 1 11A33 �' 1!1l.��11,,,t��l�l��i1��l1�1�I��1��1�I'd11 �+`'`�-� y-W,....�.k,�...,.�„a-.w " w° -.r' -r• ��.v�,� �„ � f,'�.�.�.,..H[.rue, u o \�e"�'r""�,�..w�.,.�.1+/+-r�---�srw.—lr�F ww ��..c r Xu e x, - ,�'� �" ��. ° ,�' tE Y`��'�„ l•�' a �" ��+,C` � �i�., �, ..t°�?�' f,��,hd& � ��F •u?n'a � � v /f �, 'q�' - . ci � � " , a Y'F'�,. =t �t •:r� '��,w. � v''. 4: fi3ir�j<; �e ��[i �F."�. � °t � r � r /.�:� "F'0,� 1, `� aF� � � �•k'; ,e y � ' � °' 41 ut �d ® n!49',; G ,o fly. :f'- .: ��'".' ��' / � �se�T'✓=v p� �C •� v.S�, ��.. ��", . �) v i. '�a• ..� �i"d.$f':�.:.::.�. �. '�' ' ..i�4-a..+d+�¢ia,�/tc��MY�.•.+uf%3�ht.'t�=' '-a:=.�;,�-A�oar.--�,:y.-y=z".r. 'ar%;�.'_".rsr':J:rt:�::.:.-.�r.r^:' .•..r:-..�,:;._,o_.�.:.,-�-..�v_"'•�,.,�-.-a.- u-..„�.+�rc.�.�r"'�" -:r :,,a °...,t.,'" Y � ��r' per„ �✓ � h/ ..,©� `. .. _ ° 3 _.. .�, v� , y Aga"% •v ys� P b z ..M.M y Pg y�� AQ a IL Com. `�^� ��` � a 2�� •��3a �� D � u n �•�� .� 0 !'' ° c � °Y Rot .!.'-'� f�� 'e�° / - C� a Lir v. a % .�3"• ^ ARI!" d . n t3 Tg�. o • o ' 6 IPOO ey ZAN' I.07 hisn"; - 4 - - 4, Amu 1 1 - - T-4sh V-- 7 4A&A pin, A ", to ,:'. 1, "S, - I- Aoil IW04 now .,`Leg -000 too, AtJiA,61- low, now - " ", ,- , ot. ;. -Aso I Sy pill vy", VS - X if? lit t1A1 IIIr7 "J� y"W"To 4ph, Ijo AINA;, Ito �Q,w A -W i no _�q NAT, IIyx 7N 72 Pv_ eVAT-0 =.A VC y ny 'Anna f ITow-, - 4" -,W W YO Ic Mon,!, x TOiIWAT, 'A All z �, , r, 11 t IIton! q ]Kip I Go or 1 Now" 7 Too in,. Iv llIIIIF,.F IIJW4�p jig, IA'Anna, Atoo On moo on "WA -A I" %, 4 took- tIso!, - hT too? X1710-1511 IIIt97 IIIIIIA14: Iffvy IMAI it, AICap Ii I' I, - ' �, -J,IItANY W �W, �w A -son qw- my AsoIJor&- sT_-Q IFT Dr IIlilt" IMo I low "I 01p, NON, tIIAY—' NOT>,, V A IW410 QQ I0 I ""i � Vtllw , - A tla Q- Tilf tICook 40�110, lI-to- tvs J",- AAway-. "'t INON It OX TAI -11 Na - A"- .Qov TV 7 Am Iwo W4 WM ryNp �Ayvvv ItA 14 AIN 0- 1 Two, AIIAKE Tzoo: :Qw%."QV A �, , �, wy Vol_ z TV4 Ax MCI M MI, an fix AI:No IA0106 Lyz A:5, 4 IIfit IAINA' ,;x IIIIonAion, tAtotIII144 1 .,JI" 010 im, N 0s. xOr--no IV, Oct II"y" IAiIITIIIAtImop A ny., T4 t low Ajo ;��f All. IAIIonto dorm AIat IIIItIAvg, , .. 1. , - - IIAIjai? �701 Ilk oil is IIIIIII"t *0*1; IA*yso, AQ I IIWOTT, AIn IIxx- own, I-0 II -ZETA, V wmw IIvon it" hw, 0- %VA. n, AIpost -0 bo Z, IIIIlotAlto Ica A� TVA FS, Ste- IIItoW-W t17F, AIIRielly, AIVA, ivy AIIAIOP WAT 'A tATi -4V j, I"44- -vow los's I1xv II7 Sl IVOW Alot 45�4 0"T. IAno"VQ x AtV Ice tAAtIAIAI5"! Too A, 4 AIAITIAlt film" Ano 1: I 4_11 ly IRX A-04" zoo", 0 otoAlm- Ina C�j It. rt Ait oApow tItson. VA 1 A pro IILI WT Iwo T.4 Jul IitAoIIIIIAlot II0 zoo, 'M t Sol., IToo" IIA", �zq "gy -100 fit' 2 , _. _ I - 7-- IIItoin! Mono ItIor OF IIIltit IAll, 0:0 TIt NISIiIMTON n IIIITsItway 7" " 111.4 I tAIIis SAW TII fill t4k Flows, so AAwe ft :;.No Itoohot: INOS" AtoI k11^1 ITQ IIle j,W IIo00 I -VMS IIz Ino � 'N' W-.1,, st Volvo ItANiN I"'A IA ,;0 ski 0 %_�� ", I � '+ �, y:x: W II64 Io7i* IIp IZIP IIO IIt7" AQW! IAII1K' 4 ^tA IIIle 71 "T too! AIOva. J*A ItTAV0 TIII.72� .14 AIIlIIme 'N 1F IMI oAll 1 1 Qtlol., 00 . . 1, - � - 11 Y " I IIIoft oIIIQ nlk 17 AT IIIWE IA I 4t4ral IIoff Ifat, qk Noe ootA4F IIno 4 70 ... ... I4k Oki 1 11614 Aask, ON -Anti 1 i solo"; wool OKI low NL A0, Aq 4 SAY 04 py oft too sit' CIO CFO qa,K ,_ a. I W IItTon. so I40. AIIV MrQ"- L I my ItI00 Q IlRoN .4r k wow I4V lit AIIAq I1 4077 I owl-, II&to 4T NAOX I -van, IA-Als, IIF SON toAIII=NNW* IIon, IAnA ITY4 OoTh ii. ilk, 17 II01 j7 �;*,,-,,ra,� r SW tto R