The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGPA/REZ 94-109_PLANNING 25 �� II IO �� I I� �� II� II� III III - SEPARATOR SHEET „„ 31`7l - OI �Q PROJECT NUMBER 6PR � 2�z qy ' l61 PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE NO. 94-109 PROJECT TYPE: Rezone & GPA APPLICANT: Butte County Board of Supervisors ADDRESS: 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965' * OWNER: ADDRESS: REPRESENTATIVE: ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rezone from A-R to M-1 and General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Industrial. PROPERTY ZONED. A-R LOCATED: on the northeast corner of Humboldt Ave. and Bartlett St. , poo AP NO.: 014-371-014, 015 TOWN/AREA: f'hi rn GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential 1. Application Complete: 6/l/94 Amount: -0- Receipt No.: 2 Comments sent to: PW)EH,Chico Plan. ;CA Water Serv. , PG&E North,Pac.Be11.Fire Dept, Sheriff. 3. Comments received from: L6',,F CW,--. &Q. Afr- . 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: S. Mailing UstAAad-In Sheet: 6. Assigned To: 7. Environmental Determination: Categorical Exemption-CEOA# { State Clearinghouse No.: ZNegative Declaration _Mitigated Negative Declaration " Subject to Fish Game: _Environmental Impact Report _Gen.Rule Ex.-CEOA #15061.(b)(3) Other 8. Staff Report: Project Video: 9. Clearinghouse circulation required:Yes No ' Date Sent to SCH: 10: Publication Notice Written: Display Ad Prepared: 11. Notices Mailed: Number of Notices: 2244 12 Newspaper Publication Date: O (C / P G B R 13. Planning Commission Hearing(s): ' a 0 "I O l 14 a Action taken: Special Conditions: Commission Resolution No. 14. Board of Supervisors'He __�� 9 1�. f�. a� f�' ' M • Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No.: Adopted: 15. ' •Type Use Permit/Send for Signature: 16. N.O.EJN.O.DJAPPENDIX G: Fish✓i Game Fees Paid: Yes No 17. Send validated Use Permit: 18. Assessor's Memo: 19. Copy of Use Permit/Varlance to Planning Technician: 94-312Public hearing - , Butte County Board of , Supervisors consideration of a Plan Amendment - from Low Density Residential to ' Industrial and rezone (item on which -,a negative declaration regarding '. environment impacts has been recommended) from A-R (Agricultural Residential) to M-1 (Light Industrial) , property located on the northeast corner of Humboldt Avenue and Bartlett Street, identified.as AP 014-371-014, -015,1 Chico.. (1205) 94-312 MOTION: I MOVE TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION ON AP 004- 371-014, -015, SUBJECT TO 1. ENVI_RONMENTAL FINDINGS A. AN INITIAL STUDY WAS COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT WITHOUT IDENTIFYING POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS THAT THE PROJECT MAY HAVE. ; AND B. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HAS INDEPENDENTLY REVIEWED, ANALYZED, AND CONSIDERED THE PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MITIGATION MEASURES PRIOR TO MAKING ITS DECISION ON THE PROJECT, AND THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION REFLECTS THE INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENT OF BUTTE COUNTY. ; 2. ZONING ORDINANCE FINDINGS A. FIND THAT THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONFORMS WITH THE INTENT OF THE BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CHAPMANTOWN-MULBERRY IMPROVEMENT PLAN. ; AND B. FIND THAT THE REZONE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN. ; AND 3. ACTIONS A. ADOPT RESOLUTION 94- 121 AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN FROM IOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO INDUSTRIAL ON PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED AS AP 004-371-014, -015. ; B. ADOPT ORDINANCE 3160 REZONING FROM A-R TO M-1 PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED AS AP 004-371-014,-015. ; AND C. SUBJECT TO FINDINGS INDICATED IN SECTIONS 1 AND 2 OF THIS REPORT, ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVE THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONE ON AP 004-371-014,- 015. i M S VOTE: 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 Y 5 Y (Unanimously Carried) BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 'MINUTES - October 11 , 1994 AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager BY: Thomas Last, Senior Planner DATE: July 11, 1994 REQUEST: GPA and Rezone 94-109 - Butte County Board of Supervisors: A request to change the land use designation from Low Density Residential to Industrial and a Rezone from A-R to M-1 on .84 acres of land located on the northeast side of the Humbolt Avenue and Bartlett Street intersection, within the Chapmantown area of Chico. RELATED ITEMS: 1994 Chapmantown-Mulberry Improvement Plan FOR: Planning Commission Meeting of July 28, 1994 ABSTRACT: This proposal will provide industrial designations to an existing commercial/manufacturing use. Approval will not result in any conflicts with County regulations. No major issues have been identified. Staff recommends approval of this application. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS: These requests are to change the land use designation on the two parcels from Low Density Residential to Industrial and rezone the .84 acres from A-R to M-1. The requests are initiated by the Board of Supervisors as part of the first step in addressing the non-conforming use issues that are found in the Chapmantown area. One parcel contains Square Deal Mattress. This business has been in operation at this location since 1920. The eastern parcel contains a homesite that appears to be abandoned. The project site is level and in an urbanized area. Surrounding development consists of residential homes with scattered commercial and industrial uses. The site presently utilizes septic tanks and leach fields. However, public sewer is available to the site. California Water Service Company provides water to the property. PROJECT AND SURROUNDING ZONING, GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION, AND EXISTING LAND USE: Direction Zoning General Plan Existing Land Use Project: A-R Low Density Residential Commercial/Manufacturing . North: A-R Low Density Residential Residential ■ Butte County,Department of Development Services - Planning Division ■ 1 AGENDA ITEM South: A-R Low Density Residential Residential East: A-R Low Density Residential Residential West: A-R Low Density Residential Residential ANALYSIS: In early 1992, the Board of Supervisors commissioned a study of the Chapmantown area. Subsequently, the Chapmantown-Mulberry Improvement Plan was presented to the Board of Supervisors on April 12, 1994. The third requested action stated "Initiate General Plan and Zoning amendments on Humbolt Avenue to encourage local businesses now desiring to expand." Square Deal Mattress was specifically identified as one of the businesses in the motion. As indicated earlier, this business is considered a non- conforming use. Current County Code requires Use Permit approval for any expansions of non-conforming uses. The requested actions will allow an existing business to expand their operations without going through the Use Permit process. The property owners have indicated their desire to expand the facility adjacent to the existing operation. Several buildings in the area currently house the Square Deal Mattress operations. The subject property is not adjacent to a similar zone. However, there are many commercial and industrial uses located in the Chapmantown area that are classified as non-conforming uses. Based on the Chapmantown-Mulberry Improvement Report, the County needs to take a lead in resolving the non-conforming use issue. The .Report recommended that the Board of Supervisors take actions to enhance expansion and improvement opportunities for local businesses. This action is the first step that will allow the area to be improved and upgraded, while minimizing the costs to the local businesses. The City of Chico and the Butte County Fire Department request several conditions be added to the rezone. The City of Chico requests full street improvements along both street frontages, storm drainage improvements, and possible connection of sewer (See attached letter). Since this is a rezone and General Plan request, road improvements would be addressed at time of building permit issuance. The City and County Public Works Department, respectively, indicate that public improvements would be required as part of an annexation to the City, or issuance of a building permit for expansion. County Fire requests payment of the Cal Water hydrant fund. Fire hydrants are in place along this site. Within local jurisdictions, outside the State Responsible Areas, the Fire Department does not have the ability to collect fees at time of building permit issuance. If the fees are not attached to the rezone, they could not be collected when building permits are requested. In the past conditional rezones have been used but are proven to be difficult to track since they are not tied to a project. Therefore, staff does not support a conditional rezone. The Industrial General Plan designation identifies manufacturing as a primary use and light commercial as a secondary use. The M-1 zone allows both commercial and industrial uses. Therefore, these requests are consistent with one another and with the existing activities occurring on the property. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ■ 2 AGENDA ITEM ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: This application has been defined as a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and as such, is subject to the requirements of CEQA. An Initial Study has been prepared by County staff. Based upon the a review of the Initial Study, staff has determined that the project will not result in any significant impacts on the environment. A Negative Declaration is recommended. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS: This application requires that a public hearing be advertised and held. Advertisement of the public hearing occurred on June 23, 1994 in the Chico Enterprise Record. Twenty-four public notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property. As of the date of this report we have received no public comment. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the application on AP# 004-371-014, 015, subject to the following conditions. Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act identifying potentially significant environmental effects that the project may have. Provisions and the design of the project and the conditions added to the project will mitigate such effects to a level of insignificance; and B. The design of the subdivision and improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish or wildlife or their habitat. C. The Planning Commission has independently reviewed,analyzed, and considered the proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures prior to making its decision on the project, and the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement of the Butte County; and Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. Find that the General Plan Amendment conforms with the intent of the Butte County General Plan and is consistent with the Chapmantown-Mulberry Improvement Plan. B. Find that the rezone is consistent with the Butte County General Plan. Section 3: Actions. A. Adopt the attached Resolution recommending the Board of Supervisors amend the General Plan from Low Density Residential to Industrial on that property ■ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ■ 3 AGENDA ITEM identified on page 1 of this report. B. Recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance Rezoning from A-R to M-1 that property identified on page 1 of this report. B. Subject to the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this report, recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt a Negative Declaration and approve the General Plan Amendment and rezone on AP# 004-371-014, 015. Attachments: A: Project and Surrounding Area B: Vicinity Map C: Site Plan D: Environmental Documentation E: City of Chico letter F: Resolution of adoption ■ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ■ 4 -PY19PI oI PIIumom 41guea aol woI iuwvmv uDb Pieue9 Pao l-N of 8-v wwj o wzoy Uslnoll :11NM0 msw* to WDOA 4umo atm :1NV01111V I-V MIN02 ONIIS113 tiom In Or :SllV0 WHIR N011V301 60H6 VON 1111 tw-la-tm :131RON IV ANON O NOISSIRR09 JNINNVlj HMO 111H. walsAs uoliewjolul 31ydej6oag Ajuno3 sting IS opoJ0100 IS oleo°asIMN /' ` • �e v � f m 1S uoslP°N .' '� •� Off' 0 u's , ,� oD�•o\S \°\'� a 69 alb N 011V ld \S / \6 • a i� �S ooh a o`S ♦y �N °1°IS • ZS , C / I - 8,Pj 1 00 Lf e' • 't .. . . .,,. .. - . . �- 16�I�flIAIVI� � ,� U,I II�IIp nig�� ' � I"� "gnl�l��oo ; :. ��li�'� �j'��IIIIIUjIIIIIIIIIIIi�� llll VtllVll � � ''' ' ,�I� U� IIOI��IIQIIIII u.. I� J� �ul��IV� dVll �:: , �q �glllj�m, lln��'ll , i� i�IIlO�U��lllll ��jjl�� l��lU��, IIIO .i' IpVh��ll!h��ll,�iAj'flIIIIIIVi�I�;;,�iy;IlllOfl�Qj �IIIIIIIU�IIVi �otlp@!niiiii�i�IlQ�u�I��IIIi��W� '�IIIII�j�jI�VIIIiII�U�p��6�tl��I�I��ID�IIIIpIIIIU. ��) u�,�illlj�InN��1��;�lllalll�l��l�lli�lk�lluUlu � 'SONNO E NNW � d i ,. Butte County Board of Supervisors - proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts, General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Industrial and Rezone from A-R (Agricultural Residential) to M-1 (Light Industrial) for property located on the northeast corner of Humboldt Avenue and Bartlett Street, identified as AP x.371-014, 015, Chico. (TL) (File 94-109) The Commission waived the presentation of the Staff Report. Tom Last said this application was initiated by the Board of Supervisors to address the nonconforming use in the Chapmantown area. He gave a brief summary of the Chapmantown study that was done. Commissioner Nelson said he drove around the block of this site, and it is totally surrounded by residential homes. He said the way it is now, the applicant needs a Use Permit to expand. He was concerned with taking away the requirement for a Use Permit to expand. Mr. Last said that Square Deal Mattress has been there since 1920. Commissioner Nelson said he was concerned with spot zoning industrial in the middle of a residential area. Mr. Hogan said the use has been there for a long time, without problems. He said the expansion can not be for any use that is objectionable because of noise, odor, smoke, dust, bright light, vibration or involving the handling of explosives or dangerous materials. Commissioner Nelson said he would be more comfortable with a conditional zoning. Mr. Last said this is a proposal for the expansion of Light Industrial uses only. Commissioner Lynch said he would like to limit the permit to the owner of the property and not have the Use Permit go with the land. Mr. Hogan said he believes Supervisor Dolan will be pursuing additional requirements for the Chapmantown area with a Specific Plan. Chairman Lambert questioned Section 1, Item B, Page 3, of the Staff Report as pertaining to this project? Mr. Last said this item should be deleted. 4 The hearing was opened to the public. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES. - JULY 28 , 1994 I I I i I i i y r T No one was present to speak on this item. The hearing was closed. Chairman Lambert suggested under the Zoning Ordinance findings that the Commission add the language "Find that the General Plan Amendment conforms with the intent of the Butte County General Plan and is a first step in addressing the nonconforming uses within the Chapmantown/Mulberry Improvement Plan." It was moved by Commissioner Lynch, seconded by Chairman Lambert, and unanimously carried to recommend approval as follows: Environmental Findings. A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act identifying potentially significant environmental effects that the project may have. Provisions and the design of the project and the conditions added to the project will mitigate such effects to a level of insignificance; and B. The Planning Commission has independently reviewed, analyzed, and considered the proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures prior to making its decision on the project, and the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement of Butte County; and Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. Find that the General Plan Amendment conforms with the intent of the Butte County General Plan and is a first step in addressing the nonconforming uses within the Chapmantown/Mulberry Improvement Plan. B. Find that the rezone is consistent with the Butte County General Plan. Actions. A. Adopt the attached Resolution recommending the Board of Supervisors amend the General Plan from Low Density Residential to Industrial on that property identified on page 1 of this report. B. Recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance Rezoning from A-R to M-1 that property identified on page 1 of this report. C. Subject to the findings indicated above, recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt a Negative Declaration and approve the General Plan Amendment and rezone on AP# 004-371-014, 015. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY '28, 1994 i i i j i �� w '.� �1 APPLICATION FOR REZONING BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT: Read and follow instructions set forth on last page of this form. Applicant's Name Butte County Board of Supervisors phone No. 538-7631 Applicant's Mailing Address 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Applicant's Interest in property(Owner,Lessee,Other) None Owner's Name and Address Lois Lash, Etal Contact Person for Project(if other than applicant) Butte County Planning Division Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 004-371-014, 015 Present Zoning A-R Requested Zoning M-1 Z Location,dimensions and size of area(s)to be rezoned A .84 acre parcel located at the ~ northeast intersection of Bartlett Street and Humbolt Ave. a a w H ZZ Street Address(if applicable) 1352 Humbolt Ave. a Directions for travel to property(rural and mountainous areas only) N/A CIO a i Applicant's reasons for rezoning The rezone will recognize a non-conforming use and allow for expansions without Use Permits. Proposed scheduling/Associated projects(formation of service district,etc.) None Anticipated incremental development(future development plans subsequent to rezone): A 10,000 to 15,000 foot expansion of Square Deal Mattress is anticipated. I Existing/proposed sewage disposal method: Septic, with sewer lines available Proximity of power and phone lines: To site Distance to natural water course or storm drain: Dead Horse Slough is located to the north. Little Chico Creek is approximately 75 feet to the south. 1 Describe anticipated on and off-site drainage improvements(PUD,MHP): N/A Describe how on-site and downstream drainage channels will be affected(PUD,MHP): N/A Water source: Cal. Water Proximity of water for fire fighting purposes(hydrants,ponds,etc.) Fire hydrants adjacent to the site. Will excavation or grading be necessary? No Cubic yards(estimate)? List and describe and other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city,regional, State and Federal agencies: N/A z a a (� If residential, include the number of units, whether units are single or multi-story in height, schedule of F, unit sizes, and type of household size expected. z d N/A U a If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of a a+ sales area,and loading facilities Unknown, approximately 10,000 to 15,000 square feet. If industrial,indicate type,estimated employment per shift,and loading facilities. Unknown If institutional indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities,and community benefits to be derived from the'project. N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Identify potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the rezone. What project design features or special conditions of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential environmental impacts? N/A 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topgraphy, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Existing commercial retail sales and mattress assembly since 1920. The land to 'the east is vacant and contains one single family home. Z a Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, whistorical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, F0 setback,rear yard,etc.). Z UResidential with some commercial and industrial uses. Riparian habitat a along Little Chico Creek and Dead Horse Slough. a I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read and understand the instructions and that the foregoing statements are true,complete and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Dated: Applicant's Signature Dated: Property owner's signature Project File Number a General Plan Designation Request Consistent? Z O Request: Rezone to W Location and size of parcel(s) W U w w O 3 Verify: -A.P. Number(s) Location Description a OOwnership Legal Description of Area W Proof of Agency(if needed) Maps of Area/Development to Plan for PUD's W Present Zoning U Reproducible Master Map of Development Plan(PUD's only) Date of Application received $ Receipt No. Application Taken By } 4 INSTRUCTIONS TO REZONING APPLICANTS 1. If applicant is not the owner, written authorization by the owner or other proof of agency must be submitted in order for the applicant to legally sign the application. Application shall be considered void if not signed by the owner or legal agent. 2. All items on application shall be filled in as completely as possible. Very few items should be marked not applicable by the term"N/A". 3. It is very important that the application include an accurate and complete description of the property proposed for each requested zone. The applicant will not be processed until we receive the following information about area(s)to be rezoned: a.Assessor's parcel number(s)from the tax bills or Assessor's Map. b. Street addresses(if available). c. Distances and directions to named streets,bodies of water or railroads. d. Legal description (subdivision lot numbers, fractions of sections or distances and bearings of perimeter dimensions). e. copies of map with rezoning area(s) outlined (Assessor's map, subdivision map, or other map showing parcels). 4. California Government Code Section 65300 et seq. requires local zoning ordinances to be consistent with a jurisdiction's adopted general plan. County approval of a rezoning request must be supported by finding of consistency with the Butte County General Plan. Applicants may request changes in General Plan designations by filing an Application for General Plan Amendment. 5. The Application for Rezoning is subject to public hearings and approval by both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. The procedures for County action on rezoning applications are stated in Chapter 24 of the Butte County Code. 6. Applicant fees as of (date)are$ Fees may be paid in cash or by check made payable to Treasurer of Butte County. 7. Before submitting a rezoning application, applicant is requested to discuss with staff all questions about application requirements, County procedures, consistency with the General Plan,and the provisions of existing and requested zoning classifications. APPLICATION .FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION S APPLICANT: Read and follow instructions as set forth on last page of this form. Applicant's name Butte County Board of Supervisors Phonenumber 538-7631 Applicant's mailing address 25 County Center Drive Applicant's interest in property(Owner,lessee,other) None Owner's name and address Lois Lash, Eta! Contact person for project(if other than applicant) Butte County Planning Division Assessor's parcelnumber(s) 004-371-014, 015 Street address 1352 Humbolt Ave. Present General Plan designation Low Density Residential Present Zoning A-R REQUEST GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Industrial Z 0-4 Location,dimensions and size of area(s)to be amended See Rezone Application 04 a w H Z U a Applicant's reasons for amendment See Rezone File a a Proposed scheduling/Associated projects(formation of service district,etc.): N/A Anticipated incremental development (future development plans subsequent to General Plan Amendment: See Rezone File Existing/proposed sewage disposal method: Septic Proximity of power and phone lines: To site Distance to natural water course or storm drain: See Rezone Water source: 1 Proximity of water for fire fighting purposes(hydrants,ponds,etc.): On site hydrants Will excavation or grading be necessary? NO Cubic yards(estimate): List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city,regional, State and Federal agencies: N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Identify potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment. What project design features or special conditions of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential environmental impacts? See Rezone Z 0-4a a w Z ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING U Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, a plants and animals, and any cultural,historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, a+ and the use of the structures. a See Rezone Describe the surrounding properties,including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one- family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, setback,rear yard,etc.). See Rezone i 2 I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read and understand the instructions and that the foregoing statements are true,complete and correct to the best of my knowledge. Dated Applicant's signature Dated Property owner's signature Project file number Request: General Plan Amendment to Location and size of parcel(s): a Z 0 w Verify: UA.P.Number(s) Location Description WOwnership Legal Description of Area O Proof of Agency(if needed) Maps of Area and Reproducible Master Present Zoning and General Plan Designation Date of Application Received $ Receipt No. Application taken by 3 Y , It INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1. If applicant is not the owner, written authorization by the owner or other proof of agency must be submitted in order for the applicant to legally sign the application. Applications shall be considered void if not signed by the owner or legal agent. 2. All items on application shall be filled in as completely as possible. Very few items should be marked not applicable by the term "N/A". 3. It is very important that the application include an accurate and complete description of the property proposed for amendment.The application will not be processed until we receive the following information about the area(s)to be amended. a.Assessor's parcel number(s)(from the tax bills or Assessor's Maps). b. Street addresses(if available). c. Distances and directions to named streets,bodies of water or railroads. d. Legal description (subdivision lot numbers, fractions of sections or distances and bearings of perimeter dimensions). e. copies of map with area(s) outlined (Assessor's map, subdivision map, zoning map or other map showing parcels)and a reproducible master of the map. 4. Because the California Government Code requires that local general plans be integrated and internally consistent, amendments to the Land Use Plan Map(s) of the Butte County General Plan must be consistent with written policies and standards contained in the adopted elements of the plan. 5. The "Application for General Plan Amendment" is subject to public hearings and approval by both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. 6. Application fees as of (date)are$ Fees may be paid in cash or by check made payable to "Treasurer of Butte County". 7. Before submitting the application, applicant is requested to discuss with staff all questions about application requirements, County procedures, site designation criteria and policy considerations. 8. Applicant is requested to be as complete as possible in stating the reasons for the application and encouraged to discuss in writing the proposal's conformance with the policies and criteria of the Land Use Element of the Butte County General Plan. L: 004 370 00 000 STATUS: ACTIVE i L: 004 371 014 S/S!iS!f STATUS: ACTIVE SHERRILL. BERNICE i LASH LOIS ETAL- 1299 HUMBOLDT AVE 3362 HACKAMORE LN CHICO CA 95928 CHICO CA 95926 L: 004 374 001 si 00 STATUS: ACTIVE L. Ofii4 371 1101 000 STATUS: ACTIVE DELBOSQUE JOSE RODRIGUEZ MARCELINO &: HERLINDA LOPEZ i 1365 E HUMBOLDT RD I 1421 FIG LN CHICO CA 95928 CORNING CA 96021 L: 004 374 002 000 STATUS: ACTIVE I L: 004 371 002 6/00 . STATUS: ACTIVE BISHOP FENNY CALDWELL EDWARD S ETAL I 1369 HUMBOLDT AVE 550 CHERRY ST CHICO CA 95928 CHICO CA 95928 Li 004 363 007 000 STATUS: ACTIVE ( l.: 004 371 003 000 STATUS: ACTIVE JOHNSON HARRY B REV TRUST I BARRON JOSEPH P JOHNSON HARRY B TRUSTEE 140 EUREKA CANYON RD 1359 E 10TH ST WATSONVILLE CA 95076 CHICO CA 95928 I_: 004 363 008 V_ss%0 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 004 371 004 000 STATUS: ACTIVE HANDLEY VAUDOIS E &: LAUREN E FITEGERALD DANIEL BONNIE 1 882 BRUCE LN 1:363 E 10TH ST CHICO CA 95928 CHICO CA 95926 L: 004 363 009 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 004 371 006 000 STATUS: ACTIVE KEILLOR FRANCIS M OUIRING ROBERT PAUL 1010 BARTLETT ST 1365 E 10TH ST CHICO CA 95928 CHICO CA 95920 L: 004 363 010 slsisi!s STATUS:' ACTIVE L: 004 371 007 000 STATUS: ACTIVE CORTES FRANCISCO ETAL VARGUS STEVE ETAL. CORTES RODOLFO &: OFEL-IA I LOHWASSER THOMAS J 1110 DAYTON RD I P 0 BOX 973 CHICO CA 95928 ST HELENA CA 94574 Li 004 363 011 5100 STATUS: ACT l VE L: 004 371 008 0006 STATUS: ACTIVE PATINO DOLORES SIORDIA &: GRACIELA CORT BRENIZER JAMES &: ILENE 1294 HUMBOLDT AVE 1369 EAST 10TH STREET CHICO CA 95928 CHICO CA 95928 L-: 004 364 008 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 004 371 009 000 STATUS: ACTIVE RAMSEY MICHAEL R ETAL LEMOS SAMUEL A ETAL 1,VALLOMBROSA AVE 1373 E 1OTH ST CHICO. CA 95926 CHICO CA 95928 L: 005 370 001 000 STATUS: ACTIVE Li 004 371 00 000 STATUS: ACTIVE GARVEY MICHAEL ETAL SILVA CARRIE L ETAL WOOD CATHERINE E 1118 BRUCE ST 1368 HUMBOLDT AVE CHICO CA 95928 CHICO CA 95926 L. 005 370 013 0011 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 004 371 013 si 00 STATUS: ACTIVE HERRERA PABLO & SUSAN ANN GRAHAM WESLEY &: MYRTLE. VIOLA 966 OHIO ST 1362 HUMBOLDT AVE CHICO CA 95928 CHICO CA 95928 L_: 005 0 O14 s1t10 STATUS: ACTIVE t: 004 371 6.624 000 STATUS: I.t�1ACTIV VOYLES VIVIAN E CHICO HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INC 1121 BRUCE ST 429 NORMAL AVE CHICO CA 95928 CHICO CA 95928 j. ,;�r�-- SIT L: 004 370 002 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 004 371 014 000 STATUS: ACTIVE SHERRILL BERNICE LASH LOIS ETAL 1299 HUMBOLDT AVE 3362 HACKAMORE LN CHICO CA 95928 CHICO CA 95926 L: 004 374 001 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: ON 371 001 000 STATUS: ACTIVE DELBOSQUE JOSE RODRIGUEZ MARCELINO & HERLINDA LOPEZ ' I 1.365 E HUMBOLDT RD 1421 FIG LN CHICO CA 95928 i CORNING CA 96021 L: 004 374 002 000 STATUS: ACTIVE I L: 004 371 002 00f.;1 STATUS: ACTIVE BISHOP PENNY CALDWELL EDWARD S ETAL 1369 HUMBOLDT AVE 550 CHERRY ST CHICO CA 95928 M CHICO CA 95928 L: 004 363 007 000 STATUS: ACTIVE J Lo ci 04 371 003 000 STATUS: ACTIVE JOHNSON HARRY B REV TRUST BARRON JOSEPH P JOHNSON HARRY B TRUSTEE 140 EUREk.A CANYON RD 1359 E 10TH ST WATSONVILLE CA 95076 CHICO CA 95928 L: 004 363 008 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 004 371 004 S o(.;1 STATUS: ACTIVE HANDLEY VAUDOIS E & LAUREN E FITZGERALD DANIEL & BONNIE 882 BRUCE LN 1363 E 10TH ST CHICO CA 95928 CHICO CA 95928 L: i"t 04 363 009 000 STATUS: ACTIVE � L: 004 371. 006 000 STATUS: ACTIVE KEILLOR FRANCIS M OUIRING ROBERT PAUL 1010 BARTLETT ST 1365 E lOTH ST CHICO CA 95928 CHICO CA 9:5928 L: 004 363 010 000 ---Sl 2 ATUS: ACTIVE L: 004 371 007 00 STATUS: ACTIVE CORTES FRANCISCO ETAL VARGUS STEVE ETAL_ CORTES RODOLFO & OFELIA ' LOHWASSER THOMAS J 1110 DAYTON RD P 0 BOX 973 CHICO CA 95928 ST HELENA CA 94574 L: sc 04 363 011 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 004 371 008 000 STATUS: ACTIVE PATINO DOLORES SIORDIA & GRACIELA CORT f BRENIZER JAMES $: ILENE 1294 HUMBOLDT AVE 1369 EAST 10TH STREET CHICO CA 95928 CHICO CA 95928 L: Sc 04 364 008 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 004 371 SC 09 000 STATUS: ACTIVE RAMSEY MICHAEL R ETAL LEMOS SAMUEL A ETAL 1966 VALLOMBROSA AVE 1373 E 10TH ST CHICO CA 95926 "' CHICO CA 95928 L: 005 370 001 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 004 371 00 000 STATUS: ACTIVE GARVEY MICHAEL ETAL SILVA CARRIE I_ ETAL WOOD CATHERINE E 1118 BRUCE ST 1368 HUMBOLDT AVE CHICO CA 95928 CHICO CA 95928 L: 005 370 013 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 004 371 013 000 STATUS: ACTIVE HERRERA PABLO SUSAN ANN GRAHAM WESLEY 'u: MYRTLE VIOLA 966 OHIO ST 1362 HUMBOLDT AVE CHICO CA 95928 J CHICO CA 959228 L: 005 370 014 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 004 371 024 000 STATUS: INACTIV VOYLES VIVIAN E CHICO HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INC 1121 BRUCE ST 429 NORMAL AVE CHICO CA 95928 CHICO CA 95928 ij �r f R � 5 a�-us O 1 p� _ . 4 �Q'1;11'S71 �r :-boo" c LIDO SM S _ h Q , 00 loil ov vi . � v ' q�♦., may``_ f,Xn 10 Tui: 1100 h0a - . V' --is"�Y_ k f_ _ r F . r -: 1 . � .. �, f • • ^ ` ♦�. T � � 1 � � � � , � � 1 � t'1 M � . .. t � � 1 � � + �'�r - .. � ` ` ti � -..T • f � � Y ' ,J �' � r. '' � �� • r � ` y e '1 R. • � ♦ # �.' . M V 7. . � _( ,l • , Y .. r • � � � 1 wr_ r__ —--—_— _ r r r ��.�. r��r� wry _ { MEMORANDUM TO: Butte County Assessor's Office FROM: Butte County Planning Department SUBJECT: Butte County Board of Supervisors DATE: October 25, 1994 Pursuant to Section 65863.5 of the Government Code, the following parcels identified as 004-371-014 and 015 were: X Rezone from A-5 to M-1 zoning district. Granted a variance to Issued a conditional use permit for Ar r. ORDINANCE NO. 3160 • AN ORDINANCE ZONING A PORTION OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AN M-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-29. 1 The Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, 2 under and pursuant to Section 24-29 of the Butte County Code of said County, 3 ORDAINS, as follows: 4 SECTION I. The hereinafter described area situate in the County of . 5 s Butte, .State of California, shall be and it is hereby zoned as an M-1 (Light 7 ' Industrial) District, and such area shall be subject to the restrictions and restricted . g uses and regulations pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-114. 9 Said area so zoned being located in the unincorporated area of Butte 10 County, Chico, more particularly described as follows: 11 All that certain property situate in the County of Butte, State of 12 California, more particularly described as follows: 13 All of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of Block 13 of Bidwell Ninth Addition recorded in�the Office of the Recorder of Butte County on March 14, 14 1904 in Book 4, at Page 64. 15 16 SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be and it is hereby declared to be 17 in full force and effect from and after thi.rty (30) days after the date of its passage, 18 and before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage; this 19 Ordinance shall be published once with the names of the members of the Board 20 of Supervisors voting for and against it in the Chico Enterprise Record, a 21 22 newspaper published in the County of Butte, State of California. 23 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the 24 County of Butte, State of California, on the llthday of October 1994, by the 25 following vote: 26 1 AYES: Supervisors Meyer, Dolan, Houx, Thomas and Chair McLaughlin 2 NOES: ' None 3 ABSENT: None ' 4 NOT VOTING: None 5 . 6 ED MCLAUGHLIN, HAIRMAN 7 Butte County Board of Supervisors 8 ATTEST: JOHN S. BLACKLOCK, Chief Administrative 9 Officer and Clerk of the Board 10- 11 12 Lisa Kling, .Deput 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 Resolution No. 94-121 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE BUTTE COUNTY LAND USE ELEMENT. WHEREAS, a public agency, the Butte County Board of Supervisors has petitioned the Butte County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors, through an appropriate application; to amend the Butte County General Plan Land Use Element, for a change from Low Density Residential to Industrial for that property identified on Exhibit A-1, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the proposed General Plan Amendment has been studied and reviewed by the Butte County Planning Commission and a public hearing held pursuant to law, at which time all interested persons were heard; and WHEREAS, .the Butte County Board of Supervisors has reviewed and considered the contents of the environmental review study checklist(Exhibit A-2) prepared on the amendment pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors has held hearings on the General Plan Amendments at which all interested parties were heard; and WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors finds the proposed amendment complies with all elements of the Butte County General Plan and comprises an overall internally consistent whole, specifically: �i I 1. The amendment complies with the policies of the Butte County General Plan. -2. The amendments provide for compatible development with existing. land uses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: 1. The General Plan Amendment to Industrial as shown on the attached Exhibit A-1 are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The General Plan Amendment is hereby adopted and by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte as amendments to the Butte County General Plan Land Use Element, said Amendments to be the land use policy for the County of Butte in the affected area for all findings pursuant to law. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to Government Code Section 65359 that the General'Plan be endorsed to show that the above amendments have been approved by this Board. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Butte County Board of Supervisors on this 11 th day of October, 1994, by the,following vote: AYES: Supervisors Meyer, Dolan; Houx, Thomas, Chair McLaughlin NOES: None ABSENT: None NOT VOTING: None jcu�L ED MCLAUGHUN, CVIAIRMAN 'Butte County Board of.Supervisors ATTEST: John S. Blacklock, Chief Administrative Officer and Cler of the Board By; i/�q �:. M�FIT �Ip�iIII4 0IIIIi��I.ojiiii�i��il;;� Q IInlllinllnlllllNlllllln!y^•;; Jill I��Illlllmwn�� 1 � 1 I�� I�I �� III� IPmllll II III IIIII�I•� I III I`�Itl � I ��I �III��I Ih� �llll �II III �I� JillON i III � u I Ig II ui , , aQllll �I�� II"�� IIu�,��iI1001pIgQ� IIIII��;�� IIIIII Ili�� pllll� SII �Vu6'��e; �--:;�— io�011u�� ioiimi��i� �lo�'llll�� ii.! ��iill ,VIIVih IIIV�`ia Jill- Jill, i�, V�� 01pimu�;�i�olllllllliil, � � � Illllllll�i�!' glll� &Ili„ IU\ s� � Vi !!�VIIVUIIII.III�iIj�III�jV ''�II �,. !9 Project: Butte County Board of supervisors,GPA/REZONE 94.109 COUNTY OF BUTTE INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS I. BACKGROUND A. Applicant and/or Project Name: Butte County Board of Supervisors B. Project No. (If applicable) and AP No.: 94-109, AP# 004371-014,015 C. Address of Applicant and Representative.(if applicable): 25 County Center Drive D. Project Description and Location: A General Plan Amendment to change the Land Use designation from Low Density Residential to Industrial and a Rezone from A-R'to M-1. A .84 acre parcel located at the northeast side of Humbolt Avenue and Bartlett Street. The requested change will recognize an existing non-conforming use and allow expansions without additional use permits. On April 12, 1994, the Board directed staff to initiate these amendments along Humbolt Ave. to encourage local businesses to.expand.The requests represent the first phase in solving a myriad of conflicts with existing uses in the Chapmantown area. Additional project description and area description can be found in the data sheet at the end of this document. II. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? Yes No X Maybe Response: One lot contains an existing manufacturing structure. •The proposed expansion area contains a residential building. The property is level and will not require any significant grading. The proposal will not affect subsurface earth conditions. Mitigation: None required. b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? Yes No X Maybe Response: This proposal will result in some disruption, displacement,compaction and overcovering of the site as a result of development of structures,driveways,parking areas,etc. Future development will require only minor grading to accommodate the expansion of an existing use. This impact is not considered significant because standard drainage and grading controls will be enforced. Mitigation: None required. ■ Butte County Development Services Department . Planning Division ■ 1 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors,GPA/REZONE 94-109 c. Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not significantly affect topography or ground relief features because the property is nearly level. Mitigation: None required. d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? Yes No X Maybe Response: The site has no unique geologic or physical features. Mitigation: None required. e. Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off-site? Yes No . X Maybe Response: The expansion of the existing use will not cause substantial erosion of the soils. A portion of the site is already developed, and any expansion will require minimal disturbance of the soil. Mitigation: None required. f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of any lake? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not require any modifications to existing drainage channels, and therefore not affect any watercourse. Mitigation: None required. g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban areas? Yes No X Maybe Response: This proposal does not contain prime agricultural soils. Mitigation: None required. h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Yes No X Maybe Response: All of Butte County is in a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The subject property Is located approximately 5 miles west from several faults with unknown activity. Construction of buildings to Uniform Building Code standards will provide adequate protection to occupants In case of seismic activity. Mitigation: None required. . Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ 2 Project. Butte County Board of Supervisors,GPA/REZONE 94.109 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect air quality because the Increase in the number of vehicle trips is not significant. Mitigation: None required. b. The creation of objectionable odors? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not create objectionable odors, smoke or fumes. Mitigation: None required. c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect the local or regional climate. Mitigation: None required. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in fresh waters? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect any watercourse or the direction and movement of any such watercourses. Mitigation: None required. b. Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff on-site or into any water body? Yes No X Maybe Response: This project will ultimately result in the creation of new impervious surfaces such as structures and driveways. An minor increase in surface water runoff can be expected due to the reduced absorption rate created from the new impervious surfaces. Dead Horse Slough abuts the northern portion of the property (See 3c below). Mitigation: None required. . Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ 3 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors,GPA/REZONE 94100 c. Need for off-site surface drainage improvements,including vegetation removal,channelization or c 6"rt installation? ' Yes No. X Maybe Response: No off-site surface drainage improvements are needed since all increases in runoff will be required to be retained on-site. Mitigation: None required.. d. Alternations to the course or flow of flood waters? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not after any flood control channels or watercourses. Mitigation: None required. e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration or surface water quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will neither discharge pollutants into any surface water body nor-after any water body that could result in an impact to water quality. Mitigation: None required. f. Alteration of the direction of rate of flow of ground waters? Yes No, X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect the direction or flow of ground waters. Mitigation: None required. h. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Yes No X Maybe Response: Public water exists for the current use and is available for any needed upgrade. The proposal will not directly affect any aquifer. Mitigation: None required. 4 I. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Yes No X Maybe Response: A substantial reduction in public water supplies wiil.not occur as a result of project approval. ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ -Planning Division . 4 Project:Butte County Board of Supervisors.GPA/PEMNE 94-ICS Mita ata ion: None required. j. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not expose people or property to flooding. Mitigation: None required. 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plants)? Yes No X Maybe Response: The property is located in a developed area and no disturbance of native vegetation will occur. Mitigation: None required. b. Reduction of the numbers.of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? Yes No X Maybe Response: The propertydoes not contain habitat that would support any unique,rare or endangered plant species. Mitigation: None required. c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Yes No X Maybe Response: This proposal will not introduce new species into the area that could impact native plants. Mitigation: None required. d. Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Yes No X Maybe Response: The site does not contain any agricultural crops and is presently developed with urban uses. Mitigation: None required. 5. Animal life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (binds, land animals, reptiles, . Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors,GPA/REZONE 94.100 fish, shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in a substantial change in animal habitat since the site is presently developed and contains urban uses. Mitigation: None required. s b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? Yes No X Maybe Response: The property does not contain habitat that would support any unique,rare or endangered species of animals. Mitigation: None required. c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? Yes No X Maybe Response: This project may introduce domestic pets into the area. Mitigation: None required. d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Yes No X Maybe Resoonse: The site does not contain extensive fish or wildlife habitat that would be significantly impacted by the project. Mitigation: None required. 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial increases in existing noise levels? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in a substantial Increase in noise created on-site or In the vicinity. Mitigation: None required. b. Exposure-of people to severe noise levels? Yes No X Maybe Resoonse: The proposal will not expose people to severe noise levels. Mitigation: None required. e Butte County Development Services Department • Planning Division 6 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors,GPA/REZONE 94-109 7. Liaht and Glare. Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in a substantial increase in light or glare created on site or in the vicinity. Mitigation: None required. 8. Land Use: Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of the area? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not alter the land use on site or found throughout the Cho pmantown area. This area is predominantly residential, but there are a large number of scattered commercial and industrial uses also found in Chapmantown. The mattress factory has been in operation since 1920. The use consists of the assembly and sales of mattresses. No nuisance issues have been noted with the operation. This request represents the Board of Supervisors first step in solving the myriad of issues and problems in the Chapmantown area. Mitigation: 'None required. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? ' Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect any natural resources. Mitigation: None required. b. Substantial depletion of any non-renewable natural resource? Yes No. X Maybe Response: The proposal will not deplete any natural resources. Mitigation: None required. 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not involve the use of hazardous materials, nor is located close to any facilities which store or utilize such materials. Mitigation: None required. ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Dhrision ■ . 7 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors,GPA/REZONE 94-109 b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect,any emergency`services. Mitigation: None required. 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution,density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? k Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not significantly affect the population of the area because the proposed density does not exceed that planned and being developed in the area. Mitigation: None required. 12. Housing. Will the-proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? Yes No X Maybe r Response: The proposal will not significantly affect housing demand. Mitigation: None required. 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal resuft in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Yes No X Maybe Response: This proposal will not generate,,a substantial addition to vehicular traffic to the local area. The expansion of an. existing business will allow for increased productivity and some new employment opportunities. The present use is currently being conducted from several locations in the Chapmantown area. This request will allow the operation to consolidate and therefore possibly reduce impacts. Because of the nature of the operation, a significant impact on the local transportation system is not expected. Mitigation: None required. b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect parking because compliance with the parking standards contained within Butte County Code Section 2435 will be enforced. . Mitigation: None required.. . Butte County Development Services Department . Planning Dh4slon e - 8 mr Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors,GPA tEZONE"foo c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including public transportation services? Yes No X Maybe Response: Since only a minimal expansion of use is possible, a significant Increase in congestion and maintenance requirements on area roads and on public transportation services is not expected as a result of project approval. Mitigation: None required. . d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Yes No . X Maybe Response: The proposal will not atter the present pattern of circulation In the area. Mitigation: None required. e. Alterations to waterbome, rail or air traffic? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect rail or air traffic. Mitigation: None required. f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or.pedestrians? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in an increase in traffic and related traffic hazards in the area. Mitigation: None required. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon or result in a need.for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire Protection? Yes No X Maybe Response: . The project is located In an urban area. Fire hydrants are available snd all new construction will comply with adopted fire regulations. Mitigation: None required. b. Police protection? Yes No ` X Maybe I Response: A development impact fee for Sheriffs facilities shall be paid.pursuant to'the'provisions of Chapter 3, Article 11 of the Butte,County Code, prior to issuance of building permitsor use`permit. in the case of a mobile home park. Said fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the,.date of application for the building permit or use permit. Mitigation: None required. . ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Dnnsion w Oak- WA ' I Project: Butte County Board of SupeMsom GPA/REZONE 9410e c. Schools? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in a significant increase in demand for school services in the area. New development Is subject to payment of school fees that are collected prior to issuance of building permits. While the school district maintains that these fees do not fully mitigate the impacts of the project, the County is precluded from imposing additional fees and takes the position that the .existing fee structure addresses the impacts of the projecL ` Mitigation: None required. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in a significant incremental increase to demand for park and recreation facilities in the area. Mitigation: None required. e. Maintenance of public facilities including roads? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in a significant increase in the need for maintenance of roads and other public facilities in the area. Mitigation: None required. f. Other governmental services? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in a significant increase in demand for all other governmental services in the area. Mitigation: None required. 15. Eneray. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not utilize substantial fuel or energy. Mitigation: None required. b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? Yes No X Maybe ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ 10 .:i:.ii'sSitwi:...:•:r.�„�.4:.'Ss3:3ld.'+�riato..r Project:Butte County Board of Supervisors,GPA/REZONE 94.10E -Response: The proposal will not substantially increase the demand for energy. Mitigation: None required. 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? Yes No , X_ Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect electrical power or natural gas distribution systems. Mitigation: None required. b. Communication systems? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect communication systems. Mitigation: None required. c. Water? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect public water systems. Mitigation: None required. d. Sewer or septic tanks? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will have to meet the requirements of the Butte County Environmental Health Department. In addition, sewer lines are available to the property. Should sewer connection be required, the property will require annexation into the City of Chico per their policy. Mitigation: None required. c. Storm water drainage? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will have to provide a permanent solution for drainage, since only a minor amount of new impervious surface is expected,this proposal will not result in a significant impact-on the environment. Mitigation: None required. d. Solid waste and disposal? Yes No X Maybe . Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division .. 11 Project:Butte County Board ct Supervisors,GPA/REZONE 94.100 ' Response: The proposal will not affect solid waste disposal. Mitigation: None required. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Yes No. X Maybe Response: The proposal will not create any health hazard. Mitigation: None required.. b.. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not expose people to any health hazard. 'Mitigation: None required. ' 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in an aesthetically offensive view because it is consistent with surrounding development. Mitigation: None required: 19. Recreation. 'Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Yes . No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in an impact on the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities in the area.- Mitigation: None required. 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect archeological sites. Mitigation: None Required. ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division . 12 Project Butte County Hoard or-SuperWoom GPA/REZONE 94.100 b. Will•the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to the prehistoric or historic bukMV; structure or object? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect historic sites. Mitigation: None required. c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect cultural resources. Mitigation: None required. d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect religious resources. Mitigation: None required.o . III. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self, sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Yes No X. Maybe Resconse: As discussed in'Section II of this document,this project will not significantly degrade the quality of the environment. 2 Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure will into the future.) Yes No X Maybe Response: The project, as discussed in Section ll of this Initial Study, will not-result in short-tenon benefits of the expense of impacting long-term environmental goals. ■ Butte County Development Services Department • Planning Division . 13 Y. Proiem Butts County Board of Supervisors.GPMREWNE 94.100 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considefabl47 : (A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be,relatively small,,but where the effect of the -total of.those impacts on the environment is significant.) Yes No X Maybe Response: This proposal will not.have a significant cumulative impact on the environment. 4. Does the-project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? f Yes No _X Maybe Response: As discussed in Section II of this Initial Study, this proposal will not have a significant adverse.effect an human beings. IV. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation- X_ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project COULD HAVE a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because gie mitigation measures described herein have been added to the conditions of approval for the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required;: _ Date: June 20 1994 Prepared b pa y Thomas Last, Senior Planner Reviewed by: �",• �'�'�� : i' a Butte County Development SerWces Department -a Planning Division 14 i " Projeat: Butts County Board of Supervisors.GPA/REZONE 94.109 DATA SHEET A Project Descriotion 1. Type of Project: General Plan Amendment and Rezone. 2. Proposed Density of Development: N/A 3. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Some minor amounts of new paving may occur beyond wha presently exists. 4. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Humbolt Avenue. 5. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic systems, with sewer hookup available.. 6. Source of Water Supply: Cal Water Service. , 7. Proximity of Power Lines: To property. 8. Potential for further land divisions and development: None under existing zoning. B. Environmental Settina 1. Terrain a General.Topographic Character. Level b." Slopes: None on site. c. Elevation: Approximately 215 feet above sea level. d. Limiting Factors: None 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics: Vina Loam, a 2-3 foot loam that retains moisture well and has goc- drainage characteristics. b. Limiting Factors: None 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. b. ,Erosion Potential: None c. Landslide Potential: None d. Fire Hazard: Unclassified-Urbanized e. Expansive Soil Potential: Moderate y 4. Hydrology a. ' Surface Water. Dead Horse Slough to the north and Little Chico Creek'is to the south. b. Ground Water. Unknown, potentially limited. Abundant valley aquifers. c. Drainage Characteristics: Southwest trending. d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 24 inches per year. e. Limiting Factors:'None S. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. 7. Air Quality: Good, except when stagnant air conditions persist in the valley. 8. Vegetation: The site is developed. 9. Wildlife Habitat: Small birds and animals common to urban areas. 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: High Archaeological Sensitivity area 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Low Density Residential 12. Existing Zoning: A-R ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors.GPA/REZONE 9¢1o9 13. Existing Land Use on-site: Commercial-manufacturing 14. Surrounding Area: . a. Land Uses: Residential with some mixed uses. b. Zoning: A-R c. Gen. Plan Designation: Low Density Residential d. Parcel Sizes: Small urbanized lots. 15. Character of Site and Area: Urbanized, mixed-uses, but predominantly residential. 16. Nearest Urban Area: Within Chico urban area. . 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: Within the Chico Spheres of Influence. 18. Improvement Standards Urban Area: Future development will require urban improvements. 19. Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Station number 44 approximately 1.5 miles away. b. Water•Availabiltty: Hydrants 20. Schools: Chico Unified School District. ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Butte County Planning Department _Earthquake and Fault Activity Mao 11-1. Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2. Seismic Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 3. Butte County Planning Department. _Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1. Safety Element. Oroville, CA CH2M Hill, 1977. 4. Butte County Planning Department Erosion Potential Mao 111-2. Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Mab 111-3. Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. _Noise Element Mao IV-1. Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Mao 111-4. Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville,CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department School District Map. Oroville, CA. 11. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map. Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency, State of Califomia, 1983. 12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Maas, Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1989. 14. USGS Quad Maps. Chico 15. Soil Map. Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 16. Soil Survey of Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture.' 17. Butte County Planning Departmern. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. a Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ 16 rail'IRSfI� '.a .... ................. -, - ��-..raw. s� utte u t LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916)538-7601 FAX: (916)538-7785 October 12, 1994 Square Deal Mattress 1352, 54 and 60 Humboldt Avenue Chico, CA 95926 Re: Rezone, File 94-109 Gentlemen: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors held October 11, 1994, Resolution No. 94=121 changing the General Plan designation from Low Density to Industrial and Ordinance No. 3160 was adopted which rezones from.A-R to M-1 that property located on the northeast corner of Humboldt Avenue and Bartlett Street, identified as AP 014-371-014 and 015, Chico. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this Department. Very truly yours, W' am Farrel evelopment Services Director WF:lr cc: Supervisor Dolan AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Chair and Board of Supervisors FROM: William Farrel, Director of Development Services BY: Barry K.Hogan, Plannir1g.Manager, Thomas Last, Senior Planner DATE: September 22, 1994 REQUEST: GPA and Rezone 94-109 - Butte County Board of Supervisors: A request to change the land use designation from Low Density Residential to Industrial and a Rezone from A-R to M-1 on .84 acres of land located on the northeast side of the Humbolt Avenue and Bartlett Street intersection, within the Chapmantown area of Chico. RELATED ITEMS: 1994 Chapmantown-Mulberry Improvement Plan FOR: Board of Supervisor meeting of October 11 , 1994 ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission recommended that the Board approve the project by a 4-0 vote. This proposal will- provide industrial designations to an existing commercial/manufacturing use. Approval will not result in any conflicts with County regulations. No major issues have been identified. Staff recommends approval of this application. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS: These requests are to change the General Plan land use designation on two parcels from Low Density Residential to Industrial and rezone the .84 acres from A-R to M-1. Both properties are owned by Square Deal Mattress. The requests are initiated by the Board of Supervisors as part of the first step in addressing the non-conforming use issues that are found in the Chapmantown area. One parcel contains Square Deal Mattress. This business has been in operation at this.location since 1920. The eastern parcel contains a homesite that appears to be abandoned. The project site is level and in an urbanized area. Surrounding development consists of residential homes with scattered commercial and industrial uses. The site presently utilizes septic tanks and leach fields. However, public sewer is available to the site. California Water Service Company provides water to the property. ANALYSIS: In early 1992, the Board of Supervisors commissioned a study of the Chapmantown area. Subsequently, the Chapmantown-Mulberry Improvement Plan was approved by the Board of Supervisors on April 12, 1994. One of the actions approved by the ■ Butte County Department of Development Services -Planning Division ■ 1 r AGENDA ITEM Board was "Initiate General Plan and Zoning amendments on Humbolt Avenue to encourage local businesses now desiring to expand." Square Deal Mattress was specifically identified as one of the businesses in the motion. This business is now considered a non-conforming use. The property owners have indicated their desire to expand the facility adjacent to the existing operation. Several buildings in the area currently house the Square Deal Mattress operations. Current County Code requires Use Permit approval for any expansions of non-conforming uses. The requested actions will allow an existing business to expand its operations without going through that process. The subject property is not adjacent to a similar zone. However, there are many commercial and industrial uses located in the Chapmantown area that are classified as non-conforming uses. Based on the Chapmantown-Mulberry Improvement Plan, the County needs to take a lead in resolving the non-conforming use issue. The Plan recommended that the Board of Supervisors take actions to enhance expansion and improvement opportunities for local businesses. This action is the first step that will allow the area to be improved and upgraded, while minimizing the costs to the local businesses. j Several conditions were requested to be added to the rezone by commenting agencies. These issues are discussed on page 2 of the July 11, 1994, Planning Commission Agenda Report. Since a majority of the issues are addressed as part of the building permit stage, neither the Planning Commission nor staff support a conditional rezone. The Industrial General Plan designation identifies manufacturing as a primary use and light commercial as a secondary use. The M-1 zone allows both commercial and industrial uses. Therefore, these requests are consistent with one another and with the existing activities occurring on the property. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: This application has been defined as a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is subject to the requirements of CEQA. An Initial Study has been prepared by County staff. Based upon the a review of the Initial Study, staff has determined that the project will not result in any significant impacts on the environment. A Negative Declaration is recommended. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS: This application requires that a public hearing be advertised and held. Advertisement occurred in the Chico Enterprise Record. As of the date of this report we have received no public comment. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the application on AP# 004-371-014, 015, subject to the following findings. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services -Planning Division ■ 2 AGENDA ITEM Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act identifying potentially significant environmental effects that the project may have. Provisions and the design of the project and the conditions added to the project will mitigate such effects to a level of insignificance; and B. The Board of Supervisors has independently reviewed, analyzed, and considered the proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures prior to making its decision on the project, and the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement of Butte County. Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. Find that the General Plan Amendment conforms with the intent of the Butte County General Plan and is consistent with the Chapmantown-Mulberry Improvement Plan. B. Find that the rezone is consistent with the Butte County General Plan. Section 3: Actions. A. Adopt the attached Resolution amending the General Plan from Low Density Residential to Industrial on properties identified as AP# 004-371-014, 015. B. Adopt an Ordinance Rezoning from A-R to M-1 properties identified as AP# 004- 371-014, 015. C. Subject to the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this report, adopt a Negative Declaration and approve the General Plan Amendment and rezone on AP# 004-371-014, 015. Attachments: A: Planning Commission Report B: City of Chico letter C: Initial Study ■ Butte County Department of Development Services -Planning Division ■ 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Carol Roach, Clerk of the Board FROM: Planning SUBJECT: Butte County Board of Supervisors initiated Rezone and General Plan Amendment, File 947109, to Set a Public Hearing DATE: August 8, 1994 - Please sent the above General Plan Amendment and Rezone hearing for October 11, 1994. The legal and mailing labels are attached. Hearing should not take over half an hour. Please let me know the time of the hearing. Thanks; Lynn i _ _...�n�. ,�; Dan & Bonnie FitzgeraP 708 Earl Ave Chico, CA '95928. July 22, 1994 To Whom It May Concern:. We have been long term neighbors of Square Deal Mattress Factory. We own 1363 East 10th Street and lived there until •1993, and own 1361 East 10th Street (AP #004-371-OZ-000 #004=371-004-000). Our properties adjoin Square Deal Mattress Factory to the'north. . During the more than 12 years of living next to each other we found they were one of our more quiet neighbors--they generated no smell, no noise, no•problems whatsoever. Please be aware that they have been excellent and responsible members of our neighborhood. We have no objection to their request for rezoning to.M-1 (Light Industrial). Should Butte County have any further questions 'regarding the above matter, please do not hesitate to write or call us. Daniel M. Fitzgerald Bonnie M. Fitzgeral Planning Department AUG 0 2 1994 Oroviile,California .. � � - � - - r � � � � - , �� - .. I - ., .. � .� r i _ - _ I � � � �. ' j L CITY OF CHICO INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: 44=4aR4R_;G_ pRiEGTOR& f P/ (,(r1 �J Q19 DATE: June•21, 1994 FROM: SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER HISLOP N'YC a FILE: ID MEMO/BF. SUBJECCAPN UNTY REZONE (SQUARE DEAL MATTRESS) 2, 54 AND 60 HUMBOLDT AVENUE 004-371-14,15 MESSAGE We have reviewed this proposed-project. We recommend that the following items be made conditions of site development: 1. Streets a. Install full urban improvements in conformance with Standard S-18F on the Bartlett Street and Humboldt Avenue frontages of these lots (curb, gutter, sidewalk and street pavement). b. Install street lights in conformance with City standards on the Bartlett Street and Humboldt Avenue frontages. c. Dedicate right of way to 31 feet from centerline on Humboldt Avenue and 11 feet behind face of curb at the Humboldt/Bartlett curb return. 2. Storm Drainage a To my best recollection, previous assessments have characterized that backyard reach of Dead Horse Slough from State Highway 99 westerly to Willow Street as a potential attractive nuisance and health and safety concern. Of the solutions proposed in various storm drain studies, the most straightforward was by Rolls, Anderson and Rolls to the County to intercept Dead Horse Slough immediately west of State Highway 99 and install a storm drain outfall directly south to Little Chico Creek. It was envisioned that the bulk of Dead Horse Slough could then be filled, retaining only a shallow swale, if necessary, for backyard drainage. This proposed development should be compatible with the solution to this problem and incrementally implement, to the maximum extent possible, that solution. b. Prepare a storm drain study for the future local storm•drain system serving the area tributary to Humboldt Road from Willow Street to State Highway 99. Install those portions of the storm drain system adjacent to these lots, including a•storm drain outfall to Little Chico Creek if appropriate. c. Incorporate storm drain runoff management facilities into the site design and construction. The object is no net increase in peak flow from the site to Little Chico Creek and first flush pollutant runoff control 3. Sanitary Sewer Should this property remain in the County while connecting to the City sewer system, the City Code requires that"public improvements and right of way dedications be in conformance with City standards. MH:bjo Planning Department n rNemo A:SquareD1.XH • JUN 2 3 1.994 i i''I 'P ic"i °t PBuswua 4um no1 uja4 Fpwnv uDb Pistm9 vw t-N °! a-v =4 vAna :1S10011 :11m0 uo*mk w PA" Munn sum :1NY31111 a-v :9NINOI 9NIISIXI MI !M A" :Silva 9NIIYIN NUIVO01 601-A :40N n1l tw-uf-fm :11tMAN J 133PONd 0 NOISSINNO3 9NINNVII AIN003 111111 malsAS uollemiolul 31ydej6oao A;uno3 funs is doo 0010 m !S u°=►poli '' �� '� NOIIV Id �S / alb - �� tors '� ••'! • a i� Ips ooh o� is , leo • o #Pith 00 Lf i �i i c �� ZTE NOIISINN03 ONINNVII HOW ]UN Il �I�I II� �I1 IIIIIII�IVVI9INIIIIIIWIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVIIII@�lil �� I VII�IIU�� iIdIIIIIIOgIII ill � � I hIp '. I. � �i�l��jill�� lll IIIIII�� II I�IIII Ill �li! �IIIIIII �I it I, ; ,;�, ,�Vi ''O��Nllllioo�i�p� ; �;�uu,; ��iIIIIIID� IIIIIIIIO��glll Fps: �DjD�41 �I�Vo��IIIIIQi�!�iilll�� °�IIIIIUi�,lu�� IIII �,,. IIII u� U��u,, ��IV�A�lll�p;ig"'�iiuiii��9u ��ll!;il��iIIIIIIU��IIi;;;�� ,;lllllll�;ill�lillllplllli��''°gIIIIIu�V' ooi01�� p000ioop �� °'yp �uup,�ii��il� illlllll�;llli��. ;,y,;��ol�p ��lllll ��Ilu� ��gII�Q ��IIIII'iioii �n� ' IIIIV�� Ili ° '' illllllllph ��ill' �II� III�� -1 nIIIIVO!!�ih�' �Q VIII I li�� illi � llll li�l lig;,, r`��° ��u�uuu�u;"�oIIIIIIII�i��IU� �i� ° SNK ��` � ��II�111��uIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�iIIIIjIIIIIIIV�� 1 \ RESOLUTION 94-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE APPROVING AND RECOMMENDING TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS THE ADOPTION OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO INDUSTRIAL WHEREAS, a public agency (Butte County Board of Supervisors) has petitioned the Butte County Planning Commission, through an appropriate application, to amend the Butte County General Plan'Land Use Element, for a change from Low Density Residential to Industrial for that property identified on Exhibit A-1, attached hereto, and WHEREAS,the proposed General Plan Amendment has been studied and reviewed by the Butte County Planning Commission and a public hearing held pursuant to law, at which time all interested persons were heard; and WHEREAS,the Butte County Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the contents of the environmental review study checklist (Exhibit A-2) prepared on the amendment pursuant to'the California Environmental Quality Act; and and WHEREAS, the Butte County Planning Commission finds the proposed amendment (Exhibit A-1) together with the other applicable Elements of the Butte County General Plan does comprise an overall internally consistent whole. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, 1. The General Plan Amendment to Industrial, as shown on the attached Exhibit A-1 is hereby incorporated by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,the General Plan Amendment described herein is hereby recommended for adoption by the Board of Supervisors, as an amendment to the Butte County General Plan. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Butte County Planning Commission on the 28t$f July , 1994, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Nelson, Lynch, Seegert , and Chairman Lambert NOES: No one ABSENT: No one ABSTAINED: No one NiniEf Lambert, Chairman Butte County Planning Commission ATTEST: Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager By: i E �� p91tlll�flIIIINN�19�IIIIlA91N�Y�I11Wl�Nii��' ' �� n�� ' III "'�p ��IIIII I� I��w�lllll ��6ii�mp� u ��I� �IIuIV� III II� I,'�` �i��dQ�q IIIIII gQIQ� I�� IU�;i SII � I "I�� I �tlIII P�llill�l IIUI I�IIIU IOOIIi IIIIIIIIIII�i ii VIII uIj �� Hill � 111111 ��ifl� �I �I��IV �pl� .I VIII @off ^mlli�llp iPl�mIQI�V�iIIU ��II ��I Illp�� i� �i ' SII Ali �— �i iARE_DEAL_PIATTRES422510 P. 02 Dan &. Bonnie Fitzgerald 708 Earl Ave Chico, CA 95928 Jury 22, 1994 To Whom It May Concern. We have been long term neighbors of Square Deal Mattress Factory. We own 1363 East 10th Street and lived,there until 1993, and own 1361 East. 10th Street (AP #004-371-005-000 #004-371-004-000). Our properties adjoin Square Deal Mattress Factory to the north. During the more than 12 years of living next to each other we found they were one of our more quiet neighbors--they generated no smell, no noise, no problems whatsoever. Please be aware that they have been excellent_and responsible members of our neighborhood. We have noobjection to their request for rezoning to M-1 (Light Industrial). Should Butte Co.unty.have any further questions regarding the above matter, please do not hesitate to write or call us, er I Daniel M. Fitzgerald. Bonnie M. Fitzgeral RESOLUTION 94-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE APPROVING AND RECOMMENDING TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS THE ADOPTION OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO INDUSTRIAL WHEREAS, a public agency (Butte County Board of Supervisors) has petitioned the Butte County Planning .Commission, through an appropriate application, to amend the Butte County General Plan Land Use Element, for a change from Low Density Residential to Industrial for that property identified on Exhibit A-1, attached hereto, and WHEREAS,the proposed General Plan Amendment has been studied and reviewed by the Butte County Planning Commission and a public hearing held pursuant to law, at which time all interested persons were heard; and WHEREAS,the Butte County Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the contents of the environmental review study checklist (Exhibit A-2) i prepared on the amendment pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; and and WHEREAS, the Butte County Planning Commission finds the proposed amendment (Exhibit A-1) together with the other applicable Elements of the Butte County General Plan does comprise an overall internally consistent. whole. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, 1. The General Plan Amendment to Industrial, as shown on the attached Exhibit A-1 is hereby incorporated by reference. i BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,the General Plan Amendment described herein is hereby recommended for adoption by the Board of Supervisors, as an amendment to the Butte County General Plan. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Butte County Planning Commission on the of , 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Nina Lambert, Chairman Butte County Planning Commission ATTEST: Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager By: � ,. PIIt ..,�I�I��II,IIu�Ifi�NII�II�IQII�IIGI�In�a�'III fNlllln"� I� flII ��II�III � gIIIIN161hl�IIIIIRl9111�IIIRI��&Il� i� l6�III ! ��lil '�'� il�l�l ��II� �� I��I�b;,ii�°I ��1��lb �� ,�iIIIIIIjIiQll�;�. ,'W�ir�� iiioioi ��l� �Illu�ldllii�� mp�pi��,i p ►!��oioo�� u� pilllll 1D �I p III h � II�� I �U• tl I� �Il�ln I QI V�u b�nuonip �qll III � III ,� SII AIVi�� n�um�,�oB�IIIpII��Uo� IAIIIIIIQ,e��I �InIIVi!IV�� I � NON, %XIV% SW Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors,GPA/REZONE 94109 COUNTY OF BUTTE INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS I. BACKGROUND A. Applicant and/or Project Name: Butte County Board of Supervisors B. Project No. (If applicable) and AP No.: 94-109, AP# 004-371-014,015 C. Address of Applicant and Representative (if applicable): 25 County Center Drive D. Project Description and Location: A General Plan Amendment to change the Land Use designation from Low Density Residential to Industrial and a Rezone from A-R to M-1. A .84 acre parcel located at the northeast side of Humbolt Avenue and Bartlett Street. The requested change will recognize an existing non-conforming use and allow expansions without additional use permits. On April 12, 1994, the Board directed staff to initiate these amendments along Humbolt Ave. to encourage local businesses to expand.The requests represent the first phase in solving a myriad of conflicts with existing uses in the Chapmantown area. Additional project description and area description can be found in the data sheet at the end of this document. II. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? Yes No X Maybe Response: One lot contains an existing manufacturing structure. The proposed expansion area contains a residential building. -the property is level and will not require any significant grading. The proposal will not affect subsurface earth conditions. Mitigation: None required. b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? Yes No X Maybe Response: This proposal will result in some disruption,displacement, compaction and overcovering of the site as a result of development of structures,driveways,parking areas,etc. Future development will require only minor grading to accommodate the expansion of an existing use. This impact is not considered significant because standard drainage and grading controls will be enforced. Mitigation: None required. ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ 1 1 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors, GPA/REZONE 94-109 c. Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not significantly affect topography or ground relief features because the property is nearly level. Mitigation: None required. d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? Yes No X Maybe Response: The site has no unique geologic or physical features. Mitigation: None required. e. Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off-site? Yes No X Maybe Response: The expansion of the existing use will not cause substantial erosion of the soils. A portion of the site is already developed, and any expansion will require minimal disturbance of the soil. Mitigation: None required. f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of any lake? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not require any modifications to existing drainage channels, and therefore not affect any watercourse. Mitigation: None required. g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban areas? Yes No X Maybe Response: This proposal does not contain prime agricultural soils. Mitigation: None required. h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Yes No X Maybe Response: All of Butte County is in a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The subject property is located approximately 5 miles west from several faults with unknown activity. Construction of buildings to Uniform Building Code standards will provide adequate protection to occupants in case of seismic activity. Mitigation: None required. ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ 2 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors,GPA/REZONE 94-109 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect air quality because the increase in the number of vehicle trips is not significant. Mitigation: None required. b. The creation of objectionable odors? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not create objectionable odors, smoke or fumes. Mitigation: None required. c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect the local or regional climate. Mitigation: None required. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in fresh waters? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect any watercourse or the direction and movement of any such watercourses. Mitigation: None required. b. Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff on-site or into any water body? Yes No X Maybe Response: This project will ultimately result in the creation of new impervious surfaces such as structures and driveways. An minor increase in surface water runoff can be expected due to the reduced absorption rate created from the new impervious surfaces. Dead Horse Slough abuts the northern portion of the property (See 3c below). Mitigation: None required. ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ 3 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors, GPA/REZONE 94-109 c. Need for off-site surface drainage improvements, including vegetation removal,channelization or culvert installation? Yes No X Maybe Response: No off-site surface drainage improvements are needed since all increases in runoff will be required to be retained on-site. Mitigation: None required. I d. Alternations to the course or flow of flood waters? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not alter any flood control channels or watercourses. Mitigation: None required. e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration or surface water quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will neither discharge pollutants into any surface water body nor alter any water body that could result in an impact to water quality. Mitigation: None required. f. Alteration of the direction of rate of flow of ground waters? Yes No , X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect the direction or flow of ground waters. Mitigation: None required. h. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Yes No X Maybe Response: Public water ,_ exists for the current use and is available for any needed upgrade. The proposal will not directly affect any aquifer. Mitigation: None required. l i. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? I Yes No X Maybe Response: A substantial reduction in public water supplies will not occur as a result of project approval. ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ 4 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors, GPA/REZONE 94109 Mitigation: None required. j. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not expose people or property to flooding. Mitigation: None required. 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plants)? Yes No X Maybe Response: The property is located in a developed area and no disturbance of native vegetation will occur. Mitigation: None required. b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? Yes No X Maybe Response: The property does not contain habitat that would support any unique, rare or endangered plant species. Mitigation: None required. c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Yes No X Maybe Response: This proposal will not introduce new species into the area that could impact native plants. Mitigation: None required. d. Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Yes No X Maybe Response: The site does not contain any agricultural crops and is presently developed with urban uses. Mitigation: None required. 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, reptiles, ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ 5 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors, GPA/REZONE 94109 fish, shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in a substantial change in animal habitat since the site is presently developed and contains urban uses. Mitigation: None required. b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? Yes No X Maybe Response: The property does not contain habitat that would support any unique, rare or endangered species of animals. Mitigation: None required. c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? Yes No X Maybe Response: This project may introduce domestic pets into the area. Mitigation: None required. d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Yes No X Maybe Response: The site does not contain extensive fish or wildlife habitat that would be significantly impacted by the project. Mitigation: None required. 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial increases in existing noise levels? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in a substantial increase in noise created on-site or in the vicinity. Mitigation: None required. b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not expose people to severe noise levels. Mitigation: None required. ■ Butte County Development Services Department Planning Division ■ 6 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors,GPA/REZONE 94-109 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in a substantial increase in light or glare created on site or in the vicinity. Mitigation: None required. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of the area? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not alter the land use on site or found throughout the Chapmantown area. This area is predominantly residential, but there are a large number of scattered commercial and industrial uses also found in Chapmantown. The mattress factory has been in operation since 1920. The use consists of the assembly and sales of mattresses. No nuisance issues have been noted with the operation. This request represents the Board of Supervisors first step in solving the myriad of issues and problems in the Chapmantown area. Mitigation: None required. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect any natural resources. Mitigation: None required. b. Substantial depletion of any non-renewable natural resource? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not deplete any natural resources. Mitigation: None required. 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not involve the use of hazardous materials, nor is located close to any facilities which store or utilize such materials. Mitigation: None required. ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division . 7 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors, GPA/REZONE 94-109 b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect any emergency services. Mitigation: None required. 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution,density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not significantly affect the population of the area because the proposed density does not exceed that planned and being developed in the area. Mitigation: None required. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not significantly affect housing demand. Mitigation: None required. 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Yes No X Maybe Response: This proposal will not generate a substantial addition to vehicular traffic to the local area. The expansion of an existing business will allow for increased productivity and some new employment opportunities. The present use is currently being conducted from several locations in the Chapmantown area. This request will allow the operation to consolidate and therefore possibly reduce impacts. Because of the nature of the operation, a significant impact on the local transportation system is not expected. Mitigation: None required. b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect parking because compliance with the parking standards contained within Butte County Code Section 2435 will be enforced. Mitigation: None required. ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division . 8 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors,GPA/REZONE 94-109 c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including public transportation services? Yes No X Maybe Response: Since only a minimal expansion of use is possible, a significant increase in congestion and maintenance requirements on area roads and on public transportation services is not expected as a result of project approval. Mitigation: None required. d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not alter the present pattern of circulation in the area. Mitigation: None required. e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect rail or air traffic. Mitigation: None required. f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in an increase in traffic and related traffic hazards in the area. Mitigation: None required. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire Protection? Yes No X Maybe Response: The project is located in an urban area. Fire hydrants are available and all new construction will comply with adopted fire regulations. Mitigation: None required. b. Police protection? Yes No X Maybe Response: A development impact fee for Sheriff's facilities shall be paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article II of the Butte County Code, prior to issuance of building permits or use permit in the case of a mobile home park. Said fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permit or use permit. Mitigation: None required. . Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ 9 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors, GPA/REZONE 94109 c. Schools? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in a significant increase in demand for school services in the area. New development is subject to payment of school fees that are collected prior to issuance of building permits. While the school district maintains that these fees do not fully mitigate the impacts of the project,the County is precluded from imposing additional fees and takes the position that the existing fee structure addresses the impacts of the project. Mitigation: None required. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in a significant incremental increase to demand for park and recreation facilities in the area. Mitigation: None required. e. ' Maintenance of public facilities including roads? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in a significant increase in the need for maintenance of roads and other public facilities in the area. Mitigation: None required. f. Other governmental services? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in a significant increase in demand for all other governmental services in the area. Mitigation: None required. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not utilize substantial fuel or energy. Mitigation: None required. b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? Yes No X Maybe ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ 10 . Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors,GPA/REZONE 94-109 Response: The proposal will not substantially increase the demand for energy. Mitigation: None required. 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect electrical power or natural gas distribution systems. Mitigation: None required. b. Communication systems? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect communication systems. Mitigation: None required. c. Water? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect public water systems. Mitigation: None.required. d. Sewer or septic tanks? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will have to meet the requirements of the Butte County Environmental Health Department. In addition, sewer lines are available to the property. Should sewer connection be required, the property will require annexation into the City of Chico per their policy. Mitigation: None required. c. Storm water drainage? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will have to provide a permanent solution for drainage, since only a minor amount of new impervious surface is expected,this proposal will not result in a significant impact on the environment. Mitigation: None required. d. Solid waste and disposal? Yes No X Maybe ■ Butte County Development Services Department . Planning Division ■ 11 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors,GPA/REZONE 94-109 Response: The proposal will not affect solid waste disposal. Mitigation: None required. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not create any health hazard. Mitigation: None required. b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not expose people to any health hazard. Mitigation: None required. 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in an aesthetically offensive view because it is consistent with surrounding development. Mitigation: None required. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not result in an impact on the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities in the area. Mitigation: None required. 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect archeological sites. Mitigation: None Required. ■ Butte County Development Services Department Planning Division ■ 12 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors, GPA/REZONE 94-109 b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to the prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect historic sites. Mitigation: None required. c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect cultural resources. Mitigation: None required. d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? Yes No X Maybe Response: The proposal will not affect religious resources. Mitigation: None required.e III. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Yes = No X Maybe Response: As discussed in Section 11 of this document,this project will not significantly degrade the quality of the environment. 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure will into the future.) Yes No X Maybe Response: The project, as discussed in Section II of this Initial Study, will not result in short-term benefits of the expense of impacting long-term environmental goals. Butte County Development Services Department Planning Division . 13 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors, GPA/REZONE 94109 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) Yes No X Maybe Response: This proposal will not have a significant cumulative impact on the environment. 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Yes No X Maybe Response: As discussed in Section II of this Initial Study, this proposal will not have a significant adverse effect on human beings. IV. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project COULD HAVE a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described herein have been added to the conditions of approval for the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. � Date: June 20, 1994 Prepared by: Thomas Last, Senior Planner Reviewed by: ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ 14 Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors, GPA/REZONE 94-109 DATA SHEET A. Project Description 1. Type of Project: General Plan Amendment and Rezone. 2. Proposed Density of Development: N/A 3. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Some minor amounts of new paving may occur beyond what presently exists. 4. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Humbolt Avenue. 5. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic systems, with sewer hookup available.. 6. Source of Water Supply: Cal Water Service. 7. Proximity of Power Lines: To property. 8. Potential for further land divisions and development: None under existing zoning. •B. Environmental Setting 1. Terrain a General Topographic Character: Level b. Slopes: None on site. c. Elevation: Approximately 215 feet above sea level. d. Limiting Factors: None 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics: Vina Loam, a 2-3 foot loam that retains moisture well and has good drainage characteristics. b. Limiting Factors: None 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zone: .Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. . b. Erosion Potential: None c.. Landslide Potential: None d. Fire Hazard: Unclassified-Urbanized e. Expansive Soil Potential: Moderate 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water: Dead Horse Slough to the north and Little Chico Creek is to the south. b. Ground Water: Unknown, potentially limited. Abundant valley aquifers. c. Drainage Characteristics: Southwest trending. d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 24 inches per year. e. Limiting Factors: None 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. 7. Air Quality: Good, except when stagnant air conditions persist in the valley. 8. Vegetation: The site is developed. 9. Wildlife Habitat: Small birds and animals common to urban areas. 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: High Archaeological Sensitivity area. 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Low Density Residential 12. Existing Zoning: A-R ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ 15 II Project: Butte County Board of Supervisors, GPA/REZONE 94-109 13. Existing Land Use on-site: Commercial-manufacturing 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: Residential with some mixed uses. b. Zoning: A-R c. Gen. Plan Designation: Low Density Residential d. Parcel Sizes: Small urbanized lots. 15. Character of Site and Area: Urbanized, mixed-uses, but predominantly residential. 16. Nearest Urban Area: Within Chico urban area. 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: Within the Chico Spheres of Influence. 18. Improvement Standards Urban Area: Future development will require urban improvements. 19. Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Station number 44 approximately 1.5 miles away. b. Water Availability: Hydrants 20. Schools: Chico Unified School District. ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1, Safety Element_. Oroville, CA CH2M Hill, 1977. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3. Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4. Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Mar). Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Mar). Oroville, CA. 11. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency, State of California, 1983. 12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1989. 14. USGS Quad Maps. Chico 15. Soil Map, Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 16. Soil Survey of Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 17. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. ■ Butte County Development Services Department ■ Planning Division ■ 16 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that public hearings will be held on Thursday, July 28, 1994, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following item at the following time: ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MITIGATION MEASURES REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED 9:00 a.m. - Henry G. & Marilyn R. Evers - Use Permit to allow the expansion of a pre- existing nonconforming veterinary hospital on property zoned SR-1 (Suburban Residential - 1 acre parcels) located on the northeast corner of State Highway 32 and EI Monte Avenue, at 1150 El Monte Avenue, identified as AP 002-050-174, Chico. (SAL) ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENT IMPACTS HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED 9:00 a.m. - Butte County Board of Supervisors - General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Industrial and Rezone from A-R (Agricultural Residential) to M-1 (Light.Industrial) for property located on the northeast corner of Humboldt Avenue and Bartlett Street, identified as AP,014-371- 014, 015; Chico. (TL) (File 94-109) �O 5— The above mentioned applications, Negative Declarations, and maps are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION BARRY K. HOGAN, PLANNING MANAGER To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record, June 23, 1994. " utte Count LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES = ��'. �, • 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 TELEPHONE: (916)538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 Richard Lash March 10, 1994 3362 Hackamore Lane Chico CA 95926 RE: anion of a re-exist' non-conforming use on AP 371-015. Expansion pre-existing rmmg 1352 Humbodlt Avenue, Chico. Dear Mr.Lash: The above-mentioned parcel is located in an A- Agricultural-Residential) zone. This zone was adopted on December 13, 1983 b Ordinance #2383. Any expansion of the existing use would require a Use Pe be approved by the Butte County Planning Commission. If the majority of the 'existing uses in at area are of a commercial use then the possibility of a General Plan Amen ent . and Rezone might be another alternative provided the applications woul be approved by the Butte County Planning Commission and the Butte Co ty Board of Supervisors. You might also check with the City of Chico of for exation and Rezone. Should you have any furt er questions, please contact. this office at 538-7601. Very truly yours, William Farrel Director Department o ,Development Services Larry Pa' ter Pla Technician enclosure WF/LP/ds w �._ � "�. �� ; :' %/ � %� /� J�, �, / ; �1 / . f, � , � �- %, _,/, __..--- i _._ - �, ,� �' �' '} �, � ,/ �l / j r.•' � � /,/ ``i� / / �' l / /: /, i / �� ` � �'� � // ! � ;�/ .. �� r %�, �� l� i i ' t DISTRIBUTION LIST FOR CONfN E,NTS �� - lc�iS � . SEWERS County Public Works Richvale Sanitary District County Environmental-Health L.O.A.P.U.D. County Building Division Skansen Subdivision (CSA #21) City of Biggs Stirling City Sewer Main. Dist. City of Chico Thermalito Irrigation District City of Gridley Butte Water District City of Oroville Town of Paradise IRRIGATION WATER C H 1 C-0 Planning Department Biggs-W. Gridley Water District State Transportation Department Butte Water.District Durham Irrigation District DOMESTIC WATER OWID Butte Water District Paradise Irrigation District �< California Water Service Co. Richvale Irrigation District Del Oro Water Co. Table Mountain Irrigation OWID District Thermalito Irrigation District Thermalito Irrigation District Other DRAINAGE DISTRICT UTILITIES PG&E North (Chico) PG&E South (Oroville) Pacific Bell RECLAMATION DISTRICT Chambers Cable Viacom•TV Cable FIRE PROTECTION OTHER COMMITTEES/COMMISSIONS El Medio Fire Protection Dist. Paradise Pines Architectural '>< County Fire Department/CDF. Control Committee Butte County Farm Bureau MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT Community, Association: Durham, Oroville or Butte County Lime Saddle Community Service POLICE PROTECTION District State Highway Patrol Butte County Air Pollution >< County Sheriff Control District Butte Environmental Council SCHOOL DISTRICT RECREATION FACILITIES Chico Area Recreation District Durham Area Rec. & Park District Feather River Rec. &' Park District Paradise Rec. & Park District Richvale Rec. & Park District 'State Parks & Rec. Department RESOURC$ MANAGEMENT State Water Resources Department U.S. Forest Service U.S. Bureau of Land.Management' Butte County Mining Committee State Department of Fish & Game, California Native plant Society State Div. Forestry - attention: Craig Carter Regional Water Quality Control Board p D,s--Is a-. r x /' �UTTE- COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 County Center Drive• Oroville, CA 95965-339 . (916) 538-7601 TO: DATE: June 7, 1994 RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Rezone & General Plan Amendment - Butte County Board of Supervisors Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: Rezone from A-R to M-1 and General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Industrial. Located on the northeast corner of Humboldt Ave. and Bartlett St. , Chico. AP# 004-371-014, 015. We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) . Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above-noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be 'assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which -are Potential from the project.' We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, Larry Pakifer Planning Technician Comments: Does your agency wish .to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) . Yes No �L CITY OF CHICO INTER-OFFICE nMEMORANDUM TO: &UnTy P1Qt?A DATE: June 21, 1994 X► FROM: SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER HISLOP FILE: ID MEMOBF SUBJECT COUNTY REZONE(SQUARE DEAL MATTRESS) . 1352, 54'AND 60 HUMBOLDT AVENUE APN 004-371-14,15 MESSAGE We have reviewed this proposed project. We recommend that the following items be made conditions of site development: 1. ' Streets a. Install full urban improvements in conformance with Standard S-18F on the Bartlett Street and Humboldt Avenue frontages of these lots (curb, gutter, sidewalk and street pavement). b. Install street lights in conformance with City standards on the Bartlett Street and Humboldt Avenue frontages. c. Dedicate right of way to 31 feet from centerline on Humboldt Avenue and 11 feet behind face of curb at the Humboldt/Bartlett curb return. 2. Storm Drainage a. To my best recollection, previous assessments have characterized that backyard reach of Dead Horse Slough from State Highway 99 westerly to Willow Street as a potential attractive nuisance and health and safety concern. Of the solutions proposed in various storm drain studies, the most straightforward was by Rolls, Anderson and Rolls to the County to intercept Dead Horse Slough immediately west of State Highway 99 and install a storm drain outfall directly south to Little Chico Creek. It was envisioned that the bulk of Dead Horse Slough could then be filled, retaining only a a shallow swale, if necessary, for backyard drainage. This proposed development should be compatible with the solution to this problem and incrementally implement, to the maximum extent possible, that solution.- b. olution:b. Prepare a storm drain study for the future local storm drain system serving the area tributary to Humboldt Road'from Willow Street to State Highway 99. Install those portions of the storm drain system adjacent to these lots, including a storm drain outfall to Little Chico Creek if appropriate. c. Incorporate storm drain runoff management facilities into the site design and construction. The object is no net increase in peak flow from the site to Little Chico Creek and first flush pollutant runoff control. 3. Sanitary Sewer Should this property remain in the County while connecting to the City sewer system, the City Code requires that public improvements and right of way dedications be in conformance with City standards. MH:bjo Planning Department n rMemo A:S areD1.MH JUN 2 3 9-94 o r BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 County Center Drive a Oroville, CA 95965-339 ; Plantiing Department (916) , 538-7601 J U N 21 1994 TO: Environmental Health DATE: June 7, 1994 Orville,California RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Rezone & General Plan Amendment Butte County Board of Supervisors Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: Rezone from A-R to M-1 and General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Industrial. Located on the northeast corner of Humboldt Ave. and Bartlett St. , Chico. AP# 004-371-014, 015. We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative .Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) .,.. Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above=noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Environmental health Sincerely, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH j U N 8 1994 JUN 0 9 1994 Oroville, California Larry Pa' er CHICO,CALIFORNIA Planning Technici n p1Comments: J �C`7e Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) . . Yes No ��:u ,r. t. , �:9 t: ru�."•S• I 0 9 77- Planning Department JUN 21 1994 INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM Orville,California BUTTE- COUNTY TO: Planning Department FROM: Michael Huerta, SUBJECT: Proposed Rezone & General Plan Amendment of property located on the corner of Bartlett & Humboldt Ave. , Chico CA; APN 4-371-014 & 015 DATE: June 16, 1994 Although this Department has no specific objections to the Rezone and General Plan Amendment , the owners of the property should be aware that expansion of existing facility will by law require: 1 . Connection to public sewer if it is available. 2 . If public sewer 'is not available, future development will have to meet sewage discharge requirements as delineated in the Nitrate Action Plan and Water Resources Control Board Prohibition Order . There is a possibility these requirements may restrict proposed development . mh/planning i BVE COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS�ON 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 (916) 538-1601 TO: County Fire Dept. /CDF DATE: June 7, 1994• . RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION i Rezone & General Plan Amendment Butte County $oard of Supervisors Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: Rezone from A-R to M-1 and General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Industrial. Located on the northeast corner of Humboldt Ave. and Bartlett St. , Chico. AP# 004-371-014, 015. We are making an assessment of ,possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration; Negative Declakation .with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report f(tIR) . Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts- that this project may generate. , Please respond within 14 days, of� the above-noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project: We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Planning Department Sincerely, JUN 22199 oroville,California Larry Pa' er Planning Technician / "YV�J r i.. .;i♦ ` 1 Comments• o�� ./. r•4.0 7 9 l Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the erivironmefital document (initial, study,, for4jNegative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) . " ' es No i i I • �i:, . � J � • , .... .. P i I t `Y BLV#r COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSI&N 7 County Center Drive t Oroville, CA 95965-3397 S` 1 Planning Department (916) 538-7601 JUN 0 81994 TO: Public Works DATE: June 7, 1994 ®rovill®,CaiigoPnla RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Rezone & General Plan Amendment Butte County Board of Supervisors Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: Rezone from A-R to M-1 and General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Industrial. Located on the northeast corner of Humboldt Ave. and Bartlett St. , Chico. AP# 004-371-014, 015. We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) . Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above-noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, Larry Pa' er Planning Technician Comments• Alan c ' 6 � Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) . Yes No COUNTY OF BUTTE JUN - 7 1994 wand Development'Sec. 94-111 Chapmantown-Mulberry Improvement Report - action \� requested: 1. ACCEPT REPORT AND DIRECT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO UTILIZE THE PROPOSED STREET STANDARDS IN FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY; 2. DIRECT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO INCORPORATE THE REPORT'S PROPOSALS INTO THE CURRENT - UPDATE OF THE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN; AND 3. INITIATE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING AMENDMENTS ON HUMBOLDT AVENUE TO ENCOURAGE LOCAL-BUSINESSES NOW DESIRING TO EXPAND. (743) MOTION: I MOVE TO 1. ACCEPT REPORT AND DIRECT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO UTILIZE THE PROPOSED STREET STANDARDS IN FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY; 2. DIRECT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO INCORPORATE THE REPORT,*S PROPOSALS (PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PATH INCORRECTLY PLACED ON THE MAP IN THE BOARD'S PACKET [BETWEEN ELM AND FRANKLIN, BEHIND . SIERRA NEVADA BREWERY COMPANY] AND CORRECTLY PLACED ON THE WALL MAP) INTO THE CURRENT UPDATE OF THE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN; 3. INITIATE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING AMENDMENTS ALONG HUMBOLDT AVENUE TO ENCOURAGE LOCAL BUSINESSES NOW THERE TO EXPAND (THIS IS GENERALLY ALONG THE BORDERS THAT GO FROM THE CHICO SAN PROPERTY, WILLOW EAST TO INCLUDE THE PROPERTIES OWNED BY THE SQUARE DEAL MATTRESS FACTORY) AND 4. TO REQUEST THE CITY OF CHICO TO ADOPT THIS REPORT AND STANDARDS AND INCORPORATE THE LAND USE PROPOSALS WITHIN THEIR GENERAL PLAN AS WELL. M S VOTE: 1 2 Y 3 Y 4 Y 5 Y (Unanimously Carried) 1 01 .sca.ue:�x_�•�.,:.n.t.i '.:S'�H' ... �'sl:.,..r_�S�'L 3 i �I j ,� 1{ E I -. Memorandum TO: Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager FROM: Thomas Last,Senior Planner,Department of Development Services,Planning Division SUBJECT: Square Deal Mattress located at 1354 Humbolt Ave., A.P. #004-371-015. DATE: May 18,1994 ' Abstract: Per your request last week I have provided an analysis of facts, issues and options to consider for an expansion of Square Deal Mattress. Facts: a) The property is zoned AR (Agricultural Residential). Commercial uses of this type are not allowed. The property is also completely surrounded by AR zoning. b) The General Plan Land Use designation is Low Density Residential. Commercial operations are not permitted. The property is also completely surrounded by Low Density Residential. However, a Commerciale General Plan designation exists one block to the north. c) The use is considered a legal, non-conforming use of the land. Any change requires approval of a Use Permit. d) The Chapmantown area is predominantly residential, but commercial and industrial uses are mixed throughout the residential areas. This results in many non-conforming uses. I ' Analysis and Options: a) The simplest and least time consuming way to deal with an expansion is to apply for a Use Permit. The proposal appears to be straight forward and no significant issues would occur. b) A Rezone to C-1 or C-2, either initiated by the applicant or the County, will also require a General Plan Amendment to maintain consistency. "Spot zoning"will occur if other properties, especially to the north, are not included. c) The County needs to consider the larger issue of dealing with all the non- conforming uses in Chapmantown. There are several isolated commercial uses within several blocks of the subject site. We need to consider the ramifications of any special treatment to this business. i d) An option to consider is to develop a special General Plan Policy and zone that allows mixed uses in the Chapmantown area. All legally established non- residential uses could then be classified as permitted activities, not requiring special permits, or requiring an administrative permit to minimize potential conflicts. This option would take some time to implement, but it would be. County initiated and would not cost the applicant any money. I tb tb t � � `J ► BAR TL ZAN �.. � /�� Q r� .� ��.�' �� `a y dsafhcj•b��x�!>t �asi�,af`^.�" _ri tj t i �1O `� � � /449T♦,� � ' 1' r�1s5 r,ip�riR wt� •e�• :l'�.�L'•I 1 ` Ili t ^"=nye~ i�{ 'F `- q /49.34 , L , '„� ,�• � j„�� z� �,r ?+ OO v T MI t3 t`x' ay7 r•` t4.#� t , AL i /5087 � l r \ � t •V O � R .`. ,r i ;V a.� �` � � -l"N` :'-' � ,r- �xx•,. IRK m r jr;i1. U /� --fr..i' , .., � .a • ,,,+ '1.� f t - �fi ,{� � �yS ��.,,i`�pt s n ;y.-O a; .,� ,C L OVER ii. .� r. �E,�.r '�'+� tP.I /54.8I .., d ;, /PSS[ Y•L E a .O /6♦T � ` `, `t,d O gr� ro 1 ;�!•. L:��^�yt F; ',Fq ?.`Z(;n��..;`�� I'?',�.�, .6♦ . ��. Yf>' � � �Si .v-1:. ) (� ,. ,I .�� .u.,r�V•li k��f�y�Y�-''R'y�Az. �� r�,y Cyt, K..T.> '�fW 10 F.f.'ftn `i j�d�c' It".�F�' -. n t v•v_I.t W t,,,'I� �{'�,kf 3},t !'lAll . t 7c, ,x• 1, ��fir•°� +�l � ° Ytt..}j'�`"��'��•'"•� � G � ,, Y.t ,2 1�Y'^ r 1 r_4 yl�t fTeS"• ,y,yl r • � \V •a .l JS � TM` �; �ra � � :mow.7+r•r � .r{j��E+�Yf � } �n?'slrl�q� Os + 1 z�'•'-L:°P•.ry y�.r....29!.�ayu., JWf `'��,r'nbtG•i.F '3,7 rt�^"''�1 . f - l' � E P 4'L � •i I�y�+'�� 1��',%, _.�7 r /'Ifs"��'.�,. x.��.. J:a..R1: "�• �J r ..., 1a � y.. � •'��,. t �,.� S`°'.Y ��{Y`h.�•,,t �. �1 .. .a ..L•r 17 w'r � .. F ; Y { �-_g< 3••xevg r4,ai,-mf, � ,+ �' j �,�w♦ +'4t a,�+£L'�tSP�I�•:L' .�� I R : O O � rr2% .. •.•�, y j t�a:a��a�2•.a+gi71-,s�.•y�s.v+r o�.i; - 2., � � . N _.�_�_—�•'�V/, •' -- ,� � s'..se� �rw.is9t+' '�t?' _� ,'r�•xSyi C '1\�V1 ��, .. .. .......,..,.r�„•,+,.,��e k.�',W..-r' ''�yi ,.F'� .v£s T�. ;�,I.��RC � 2ij 1 '' '"��•.i��7-;..,y�.,t:..x�y��l'" 'a;�,�et.�,e ,4�;f •C l S�.t J aa-y�{� �'� .•1h s a= 1,;R c 1 ;�� i a•'r,-2 •�'"' Y xrh•'S'.''l,-r,'`.t r~� ••,rr CID ct H * •, � • •d ; � t "Y � •,'rm•9 r�_ �,�y •s{ �'es ='�{4t,�t�''�f#�'�� 1 ,#L `�,"a�;' f N •{. , � pp v 5 � � � E , � �.-� rr��'`�t�a `fir '�' + } yt .\A`' \ � {i.,�y,...., i. [ x �. r L•3•a t �: \ `•� 1' t ,. I 4� S~• ^,"'i n�.�� q, "t a.+ts�„�-�',},r�{,��" r ��♦„��r ` / N1 ' { 7.?'_ \ 1 O' I•.. I :. •{; r 9, yytr e- �, ,Yfx ef•+e'°f� :'' , i { r fg, + I \ i 0 `) 'X ! j�,, ! j"� '�r_r }r7M `( L�xxx; Sy't+^ •"h t� ,a ^Qys"(5'• IiaG's` h4x 1 = Ffr .,r R /.•r7fi r.o < �r fi ' t x }SFr K 0 o t t ! C c 4: r `v£j h j �k E t X•yk n� cs �rq' U „� +! L [ .R �_'.�f ;yT.e. � i " �. r N /Er f e t'L�i•41•�d•n�. f'� "�`� .. - .:4•".R,r ..,..•.. x-iit„'�,•vj •�+,r w'r r 'F( "yam' F !t', y • Qa iu,.iwn t7s• 4 r ..•.vwnw-er...♦..R,. ♦ j•v¥ i art ' � {� • .... .y ..m t u.�y?uG1w•9sk w. ib + Rr y =+L°-.�'" - 4 ] k. ` t'.Sr t>-R 1`♦�' 7. f6.� :ti'3•M+•�cL.r.ra ..=s.; . ..r�5• -_ _ ,_ .-�.....,FS .1: b .a't}F+ `":a{rl; .�. .kr...•";.ts,..al )4'i+•1 tTy.•µy"" d,.y,�.,R,y^�V"•!• ... � --.., v,k' .. ►. i�w ..cALt M_ - - i '/ CtLS -tr qr 2 :. $ 1' .� .meq oy .•e�I jf P2 4. "t ?.•: ,,.f ,�;, g x u't'f �-1� • r. -°`a.�^'"-w�.: 's �•—Fao r cwt-.q•�ta"7's'" nw.0-a:- - ..n.svr..w .��n -w u r --,„.-•._ •'^-'"'S5�`' '"•+•4::.s'r1.. - r��?��e.'"..'�.'.: ,;�r;r=a+^'.r+, ,�,••,ry-' 3s�� n 1 r �: n _ .. � _ .� 1 s:•E� 4 •(; v �fl, 4�,1�'Ifl = ,' i . . 1 ., tw J t:F� R , s f '�r a�.S 1 A }� ��•irei 3G c *E•` ;; { Y 3�� ? 1 , YI`I� ��y'! �, .il V' A f�,e F,? 'ii till vlrw ;hM1i� ~rt�`r•t R *. i {i I 11 f� u+, r•(.• .I `1 r t'+j.lry? ,'�.=i ,y}-r' �.�,�'� �' t 't r ( ' i, I•S}{i '�.I a� ,1 i t' _ i�7(!11 � ,, 4 r , k , { ".I ,T ':; ,r.ISF''•J - ' , ,�,'k � `r� - R i,,,t, r,s_Tir-� 4�1., t.�t 4 'y}• { L I LADEN ' t `�., lig t•( •' '• /0�./� itrs rrgi• . g s :f.,'p (• S , r .I' i 1 ,, I i �• .,�r,r,,' '`�E�y�� •+ moi''; A},S' ! 1' O '••l ,. 'i '• i• i 1 "T >,JJ�>• y ski q .'C' 1 •r.l'''I#�'-t t• ' V 'a•i \ I iY 1 j •, � y f�j I I ,. J .h "'M �� 'L�'�f4 ? .aryty�?'-{_ '� t i j; '//��` 1 - ,•�.» k j,.` i ��; ` 4.,�," LtaY}c,rih-i1 r +�{' •j. f 1 1, �`• � 1 i i_ri_ ''dF.O � 1 'Y.a if, t k +t Via•t"' 1 f F •'F Ir •1' O ., cz - x•i•,galx.4 uFY a-.wp.{t. .rF. '� ala, ( r � \ ayj } O 1 1 Sf�'F•t.�.•''' s !t a.IQ ?�' - � h I 1 .:;�� O 1 ;=,•C:� rTgC.�y�.S a of i' ri?'V b , V' ;V `'� I 1 � �•,� ^� r `�Ctl} � ��4fs4�i� r+, �. i.'`4 'tat .tt, Er x Ikf • - ,:' t.. wrt I I �" ,�... �e aA � �.�. y,�h i,r �; �- -":fir, �+ _ � {` '�.r � � - 1 I ''•�-�t,�'r4'a. i��•��i �sT't�R��}°�'•� a.r� t q } 1 t ; _ t 1 •.. ��.J A i ,xr" rt'i•+z„A] ^� >. ;,1 s' I 1 , , '.1• I I .•�.l, \i[,/) it 4, 1 '' 1Z). A' iTd A_4, tp ` , 'i •. ;f .1 �"3 � ..� ..�-� *.. .. :: r'y~�` [-`�r�1�>�`}>�:`+'yl x fQ 'v •'{I Jy�,�. , mow• _' ` I.i Via,Y•4 , � T t *1 i. ,` f• 1 J,; , t ,'i. „ 1 I ? ,.,y� v.9{i,lYy f »S''1 r� r•�5;; rr�vn. r • �'1 .i '�S I 't• ♦"j, r :r'k'"k 6 +{h J�?;a•.JS"t'iig � yr F nr_'s a"! i`C. �tj' •e' s ';��(, , .. .wool •' , .. ,i � .r. I t", 1 0',��i i >� � �i iY''!�#'� � ,�t ['{ xi J6 `.. Ii •/o0 Yrs Y, , ax' '; n�•;,m,...... is art ''pfr�'lili � J WILLOW ' • \ m v yrs,`.,, �``�� _C_ '+ x��, k�.a,..x�,�.�., .wa. ��s�.�„�f ,i[�v,+ •.`' ter �['yf�.. j { I i �S ., � w ,� `, + ,p-�""h '"'i, s��.,:" �Jx..;s;� ;;:,�� ••_a,�� • �': 'a, �) 1 _. Ab i U F ti 't Y 1, r s'`� � �,av Y •,k Q 1 a S [1 - I -r�I t IV — - i ! '•}!q W .,Ix,. �iTa`-.:tJ>• '$•(„ :4} ft Cb �s}11Y. ,R j /24.9 ^• S Ori'�. '"}� Cb 10 �51 ° 135.59 l N h x>;l ,•;•W . s , Y z :a�Y�,'�, WKjti . ,x �tttif y 0 ; (O� � !. - �1 .. t : �F�,• I};Ws,1v'�! ��y`�'/•��t.{-yi x.� fr Z •a ',,i7j Cbt - N \ .:.t h, +.`�1♦rh[Y"�� rtr 3rfSx',.y{P �' i J�v �.A F �r p ~ � IQ, �.'i ,. , 159. N -.'?rt• ' .. { O \ ;h+,ay. ,' r �' i b � y.%r,;r•y� F ak ��'H+„�' �.0� �,. '7r ;max ��3+ D O i�•I',1 Q I_. ..• V iiL' 41y O szt e'ia (2^} t 3 a Nl � ,y 101 ..'.r ,•, to �, '`� r; ��. �,i;�•-34"#'YI,p" '4 O b 1 r 110 C 3 � 'a• �Ti'J„� C i I QT��\ � vt ,a 1 cS�M•..[ Ilk:`t �''7•?,itfcC,�Trr^'�t �3 �i Q .1 r, ( I V' J \ l J ,:' a W�S''l5-kfity+� ""�s•s'-�'.••2�.rr1 tr 1 \J ij v •�.vfV� �rf {F,x'-y� w+•�'A : +, ��:A(' tt� t .r. hm oAli- tin.R 1rll4P.09 C , 1 I 'k.f. t o r �•- .r�'�'F,, t3�4'r � ,+„�`1' i'� i � �_ BARTLET T., i $ ST � f.� r �a , �r r. .� i.'c: Z.. _ ,v S - S,y'ti Y, ",�+,.tt•`a`� ,� "'`fr�t� �' a''tY Q 1 - '0` .' s - i .r„ + 41:1 r y -, i`• 4rY w t _ts Y�},4+^i*,£ `: 'S;�ptyre "t ti 's• y�_ +', _ .-'T • t ! t ;w•. r� '' , 4 «„'� f.� ►�'e Cv t� -' ..T. of.ti, Y. ' ' ,s C i: I z �'`>{H• w a F► r red ItOy r i ;'i •x A5 F��.;.y 1, a��.'((i'�,ri ltii'fie. •.-{ "[?"� .i1 _ k ,' �' '+, ..O s .%, � { -•^ : ': 't ro l jf ilt yi�e-•�n.�,�Y•.�'r �'`g• � ' • .'`N, + f � i'« �� ';S 1 r , <y �i,f,-Y f i r-`t le t.�,�y 3 .F z,�• t Myki�-f 'r „Y 1 r k �f:•i^ .�' t ..� ` r' y ,,..,:t ..Ilya '. n .r ,� 7 �- X.i ��f _!; '!yJ:.gc�t.)'•TtYc}w''�"#'N�+� y •.+;p �. ..,tib,, '--�• _ .r i- ��.'l•� ": k... [ .•t`-3a d-.'tl_ , _ '�}"ix • ',5,,,, •tit`e- 4 v•n,_.•ripi'• y,::�-,;:SL'SJ,r.;; �' :i.= f..,sr a x i�'�if1: +;'t{.%. •a- • � � Jt,V" _�°•''' aw.,c6,..•y+...R. "�1,!"-•+'rr.�iVc.....�J.:,.... ... qtr-.•$,:,w. � -,'• . _ , w.. ' '. '[..Z�A�W,.:-.r.'i•:i�i+�''.•^, r �.i i- �;.w..,�... � , �:C"�', ':..�.�.: �r. .. ........ .. _ .,..,.. ......oma,,.,; - ,,,,;. � ,-"-`:.c`—..- .. •,..-..^.e:;a!4g!?"<";i,%tr�=e.•.•x+.�r .r..-i�.,�eevk+6:...•.,. .a.. _„�n„�:..it. „".:�.=R�•!".o'°'c:�C2a2.�i,:nw1 _.l:t'P'.r"•..- :•!^-.,...,.r-r*�?r.,. - ,.�. A V � y JAI ' � �F al I. I �:� i c i s ' �, � . . ,., ,�,,t,�,. ... __ ,. � ., _ .. .. _ . ..__ �; .. _ _ -• ~- „ 60" �}}n L/NOEN ST.' E 602 125 /20 160 / 5 � r .. rr, \ if 5 tf CD y rl 0 Ci IUD I — ---- - l2 /so . ISP fil 140 C3140 140 O — — — 120. /60 7 Cts N — b 125 125 W/L LOW • •- O VI - t � - , ` "tet' ° 7 . (�1 W 140 . O. .140- (D 40- O —p . �o cz to 44v 125.0 O O Z y ro 0): c°jir y .125 280. BARTLEl.r ST v M J o v �' H ► » — pt 20 Up Q� — — a 1044 I 0.61 1 116.7 O N BARTETT ST. N125 ` a _.,.f �••.-••..fes ` .•r. a•rr^•.'-�Q� - 1025 G) � O r. 1.9 7 UO �o Q Z y C a O 280Vo a t 1..i 160 7' ` 140 ' O _ i O !�tx IL (�•j ENT 16&18.9IL 46 8�48 41 + b f O rs • � � S h V iJfa Y�414 ;o CUD IpN rA 110 -280 bFlC�i3aOVER— PASS 95609E.s.ss6 STATEHWY 9E �,: ,- • ter:: �.�F..,. T 1 ... ^YpM•Tc �¢r�A• •� � d. er • ..{. 4 �! .=gam,#�+ "��y��''� fk��'�r]'�•-�+,^ y �; - - '. •. .•,�, -'.:-•-# c:5++n..-:_, _ _ �'y'. ,� f�y -__'Tr'ra�.+c.vs'17 �, r"�t,.r, t'•'.�+3T'-,1..'•: •a.r--•-5'—•--....•.,—. - Js.- ...-:�-'fir'---.-, - - _ ,�^"Z^_r'-_---'•:. _ i I «-' ,`� .� ,, - /�• � Via- � lb NWA 31 111.ik ung No lam w Aw ■ 111/ ► � �iI ��illi �� JOT W. all lull -0 11 all W-' ■� X0110 1 no Iowa goo 10-16 . i =�`` •-1111/11 111 U11U1111115U1111115. �' ► �o c�.,�,�� -° �/111 � ��`�1'1�1�� i':-zl ti Is �= 11111_ j� 1 � • qt C,1 =.F V�.tZi .r' t. �r •-t n CA PILE NO: APPLICANT: BVT T E C-curJ7-1-11 fop�T_> _,�s (j� S0Peay1 SO�� OWNER: REQUEST: `P-.E 2-ON E T:`R.O -T D A Nib GG K3E T2_A 1... i.l> T'© 19Jr-)J S T f_1 A1_.. AP NO: OOU - 3_ 1 - W4 0k5 SIZE: Cil LI = 'O .JSP A C. 0�5 0 c 2� Qc, LOCATION: Nu 3CDt--Ci AVE . AW-Z) 53A1zT LEST ST .. C1kIC.� EXISTING ZONING: �'U ZONING HISTORY: A-1 c�!V 11-12- F13 Wi C ab-t 2 62 SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: I—) ��S VT i bE.N?T 1 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that public hearings will be held on Thursday,- July 28, 1994, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following item at the following time: ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MITIGATION MEASURES REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED 9:00 a.m. - Henry G. & Marilyn R. Evers - Use Permit to allow the expansion of a pre- existing nonconforming veterinary hospital on property zoned SR-1 (Suburban Residential - 1 acre parcels) located on the northeast corner of State Highway 32 and EI Monte Avenue, at 1150 EI Monte Avenue, identified as AP 002-050-174, Chico. (SAL) ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENT IMPACTS HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED Butte County Board of Supervisors - General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Industrial and Rezone from A-R (Agricultural Residential) to M-1 (Light Industrial) for property located on the northeast corner of Humboldt Avenue and Bartlett Street, identified as AP 014-371- 014, 015, Chico. (TL) (File 94-109) The above mentioned applications, Negative Declarations, and maps are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION BARRY K. HOGAN, PLANNING MANAGER To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record, June 23, 1994.