The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGPA/REZ 01-02_PLANNING Z SEPARATOR SHEET avry 021 ,— Z50 - 00G PROJECT NUMBER_ (�flZRez Di - Oz PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET k , -FILE#: 'GPS.%REZ 01-02-,,,...PROJECT TYPE: General Plan and Zoning Amendment APPLICANT: Butte County Board of Supervisors ADDRESS: 25 County Center Drive OWNER: Various ADDRESS: REPRESENTATIVE: ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: General Plan and Zoning Amendments in and around the Gridley sphere of influence to reflect changes in the sphere adopted by LAFCO in April,2000. PROPERTY ZONED:Varies,generally SR(Suburban Residential),SR-1 (Sub Res one acre parcels),and A-5,(Agricultural-5 acre parcels) LOCATED: In and around the spere of influence of the City of Gridley. AP#: VARIOUS TOWN/AREA: j GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: 1. Application complete: Amount: $ Receip Sent to Billi "Rollerdeck 2. Comments sent to: 3. Comments received from: 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 6. Assigned To: Craig Sanders 7. Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No: Categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Subject to Fish&Game: Environmental Impact Report Gen.Rule Ex.-CEQA#15061.(bx3) Other 8. Staff Report: Project Video: Release to publish: 9. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: 10. 'Publication Notice Written: Display Ad Prepared: 11. Notices Mailed: Number of Notices: 12. Newspaper Publication Date: -/_�- O C Pf Gl B R .B. Planning Commission Hearing(s): Action taken: Special Conditions: ' Commission Resolution No. 4 14. Board of Supervisors'Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: 15. Type Use Permit/Send for signature: 16. N.O.E./N.O.D./APPENDIX G: Fish&Game Fees Paid: Yes No 17. Send validated Use Permit: 18. Assessor's Memo: 19. Copy of Use Permit/Variance to Planning Technician: 20. To Final Billing K:\PLANN ING\PROJECTS\GPA\REZ01-02\SUMMARY.WPD CI rt• ' VO�'�� Butte County Department of Development Services, (item on which a notice of intent to adopt a Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding environmental impacts has been given), Rezone from A-5 (Agricultural - 5 Acre minimum) to C-2 (General Commercial) in order to bring the zoning into consistency with the General Plan designation of Commercial. The 2.95 acre property is located on the southerly side of State Highway 32 (Northerly extension of Nord Ave.), ''" • approximately 1,200 feet east of Muir Avenue, in the Chico area. APN 042-100-004 (CD) (REZ 01- 02) Mr. Durling said the reason for the continuance is to add two additional parcels to this request. The property owners of the two additional parcels just recently agreed to be a part of this rezone. The hearing was opened to the public. It was moved by Commissioner Leland, seconded by Commissioner Lambert, and unanimously carried to continue this hearing open to June 14, 2001. I I i i ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■MINUTES ■MAY 24,2001 ■PAGE 5■ 5. Board of Supervisors General Plan Amendment and Rezone for the Area in and Around the Sphere of Influence for the City of Gridley - Report to M the Board - pursuant to Butte County Code Sections 24-30(b), 24-25.30 and 24-25.40(a) and (b), the Development Services Department submits the Planning Commission Action Report on a proposed General Plan Amendment, changing the land use designations on the Gridley/Biggs Area Plan Map, as well as amendments to the Gridley Urban Reserve Map, and policies in the Land Use Element in and around the Sphere of Influence of the City of Gridley. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the General Plan Amendment and Rezone - action requested - ACCEPT FOR INFORMATION; AND SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THIS MATTER FOR MAY 8, 2001, AT 10:30 A.M.. C� P BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - MINUTES - April 24, 2001 ,rte i 01-169 A Matter on Which a Public Hearing Has Been Held and Motion of Intent Adopted - General Plan Amendment and Rezone for the Area in and Around the Sphere of Influence for the City of Gridley - consideration of the actions needed to implement the Motion of Intent passed by the Board on May 8, 2001 - action requested - STAFF RECOMMENDS THE BOARD TAKE THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS : 1 . SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III A(1-5) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 8, 2001, ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; 2 . FIND THAT THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS WILL NOT CAUSE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE TO FISH AND/OR WILDLIFE OR THEIR HABITAT AND APPROVE A "DE MINIMUS" EXEMPTION TO THE COLLECTION OF FEES PURSUANT TO FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 711 . 4 (d) (3 ) AND 14 CCR 753 . 3 , AS THE PROJECT SITE IS NOT KNOWN TO CONTAIN ANY SPECIES IDENTIFIED AS A CANDIDATE, SENSITIVE, OR SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES IN LOCAL OR REGIONAL PLANS, POLICIES, OR REGULATIONS, OR BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME OR UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICES; 3 . SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III C (1-3 ) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 8, 2001, ADOPT A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN; AND 4 . SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III D(1-4) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 8, 2001, ADOPT AN ORDINANCE REZONING AREAS IN AND AROUND THE GRIDLEY SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT MAY 8, 2001, AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN. (FILE NO. CBS [GPA 01- 021 /FROM 5-8-01 [5 . 021 ) (****2868) (*****00) 01-169 MOTION: SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III A(1-5) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 8, 2001, I MOVE TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FIND THAT THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS WILL NOT CAUSE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE TO FISH AND/OR WILDLIFE OR THEIR HABITAT AND APPROVE A "DE MINIMUS" EXEMPTION TO THE COLLECTION OF FEES PURSUANT TO FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 711 . 4 (d) (3 ) AND 14 CCR 753 . 3 , AS THE PROJECT SITE IS NOT KNOWN TO CONTAIN ANY SPECIES IDENTIFIED AS A CANDIDATE, BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - MINUTES - May 22, 2001 SENSITIVE, OR SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES IN LOCAL OR REGIONAL PLANS, POLICIES, OR REGULATIONS, OR BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME OR UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICES; SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III C (1-3 ) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 8, 2001, MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 01-053 AMENDING THE BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN; AND SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III D(1-4) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 8, 2001, FURTHER MOVE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 3723 REZONING AREAS IN AND AROUND THE GRIDLEY SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT MAY 8, 2001, AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN. M S VOTE: 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 Y 5 Y (Unanimously Carried) BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - MINUTES - May 22, 2001 Reaular Agenda 01-147 Public Hearing - General Plan Amendment and Rezone for the Area in and Around the Sphere of Influence for the City of Gridley - Butte County Board of Supervisors - consideration of a General Plan and Zoning Amendment in and around the City of Gridley to reflect changes made to the Sphere of Influence by the Local Agency _Formation Commission in April 2000 . This is an item on which notice of intent to adopt a negative declaration with mitigation measures regarding environmental impacts has been given. The proposed changes are as follows : 1) Change the Land Use designation from Low Density Residential to Agricultural Residential and Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 140 acres located on the east side of Gridley between East Gridley Road and Sheldon Avenue; 2) Change the Land Use designation from Medium Density Residential to Agricultural Residential and Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 9 . 2 acres identified as APN 024-270-032 ; 3 ) Change the Land Use designation from Low Density Residential to Agricultural Residential on approximately 35 acres identified as APN 021-070-087 (ptn. ) and APN 021-070-050; 4) Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 30 acres located immediately northwest of the Gridley Sphere of Influence; 5) Rezone from SR to SR-5 approximately 28 acres identified as APN 022-230- 001 and 022-260-006; 6) Rezone from . SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 34 acres located within Gridley' s Sphere of Influence on the south side of Yew Street and the west side of Oregon Street; and 7) Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 51 acres located within the Sphere of Influence, immediately adjacent to the city limits, on the southeast side of the city. Also proposed is an amendment to the Gridley Urban Reserve diagram and policies in the Land Use Element of the Butte County General Plan to reflect the City' s new Sphere of Influence - STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE BOARD TAKE THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS : 1 . SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III A(1-5) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT -DATED MAY 8, 2001, ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; 01-147 2 . FIND THAT THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS WILL NOT CAUSE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE TO FISH AND/OR WILDLIFE OR THEIR HABITAT AND APPROVE A "DE MINIMUS" EXEMPTION TO THE COLLECTION OF FEES PURSUANT TO FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 711 . 4 (d) (3 ) AND 14 CCR 753 . 3 , AS THE BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - MINUTES - 5-8-2001 PROJECT SITE IS NOT KNOWN TO CONTAIN ANY SPECIES IDENTIFIED AS A CANDIDATE, SENSITIVE, OR SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES IN LOCAL OR REGIONAL PLANS, POLICIES, OR REGULATIONS, OR BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME OR UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICES; 3 . SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III C (1-3) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 8, 2001, ADOPT A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN; AND 4 . SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III D(1-4) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 8, 2001, ADOPT AN ORDINANCE REZONING AREAS IN AND AROUND THE GRIDLEY SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT MAY 8 , 2001, AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN. (FILE NO. CBS [GPA 01-02] /FROM 4-24-01 [3 . 051 ) (2441) (**00) PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: 10 : 56 A.M. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 11 : 09 A.M. MOTION: SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III A(1-5) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 8, 2001, I MOVE FOR A MOTION OF INTENT TO: ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FIND THAT THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS WILL NOT CAUSE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE TO FISH AND/OR WILDLIFE OR THEIR HABITAT AND APPROVE A ."DE MINIMUS" EXEMPTION TO THE COLLECTION OF FEES PURSUANT TO FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 711 . 4 (d) (3) AND 14 CCR 753 . 3 , AS THE PROJECT SITE IS NOT KNOWN TO CONTAIN ANY SPECIES IDENTIFIED AS A CANDIDATE, SENSITIVE, OR SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES IN LOCAL OR REGIONAL PLANS, POLICIES, OR REGULATIONS, OR BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME OR UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICES; SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III C (1-3) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 8, 2001, MOVE FOR A MOTION OF INTENT TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN; AND SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III D(1-4) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 8, 2001, FURTHER MOVE FOR A MOTION OF INTENT TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE REZONING AREAS IN AND AROUND THE GRIDLEY SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT MAY 8, 2001, AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN. M S VOTE: 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 NP 5 N (Motion Carried) BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - MINUTES - 5-8-2001 .>„ Butte County Board of Supervisors, proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts, General Plan and Zoning Amendment in and around the City of Gridley to reflect changes made to the Sphere of Influence by LAFCo in April, 2000. The proposed changes are as follows: 1) Change the Land Use designation from Low Density Residential to Agricultural Residential and Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 140 acres located on the east side of Gridley between East Gridiey Road and Sheldon Avenue; 2) Change the Land Use designation from Medium Density Residential to Agricultural Residential and Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 9.2 acres identified as APN 024-270-032; 3) Change the Land Use designation from Low Density Residential to Agricultural Residential on approximately 35 acres identified as APN 021-070-087 (ptn.) and APN 021-070-050; 4) Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximat--ly 30 acres located immediately northwest of the Gridley Sphere of Influence; 5) Rezone from SR to SR-5 approximately 28 acres identified as APN 022-230-001 and 022-260-006; 6) Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 34 acres located within Gridley's Sphere of Influence on the south side of Yew Street and the west side of Oregon Street; 7) Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 51 acres located within the Sphere of Influence, immediately adjacent to the city limits, on the southeast side of the city. Also amending the Gridley Urban Reserve diagram and policies in the Land Use Element of the Butte County General Plan to reflect the City's new Sphere of Influence. (CBS) (GPA 01- 02) Mr. Sanders gave a brief summary of the project. He stated that the Urban Reserve area also needs to be amended due to the new Sphere of Influence area. He said the areas removed from the Urban Reserve need to be addressed with 5 acre zoning. Commissioner Leland said this is maintaining the status quo for actual development. He said before some of the area was zoned SR-1, but was covered by the Urban Reserve with a 5 acre minimum. He said now the Urban Reserve is removed from the same area, and staff is proposing a SR-5 zoning, so there is no change in the owner's ability to develop. Mr. Sanders said this is correct, but with this proposal the future development potential for the areas that were in the Urban Reserve has been taken away. He said this was done by the changing of the Sphere of Influence. Commissioner Leland said the Commission needs to consider if it makes sense to keep the land at 5 acre zoning or change the density to a one acre density. He said one factor is that Gridley is saying they want 5 acre zoning. He discussed future infrastructure in the area., Mr. Meleka said the intent is to ensure orderly growth and development. Commissioner Lambert asked if this is an,exchange with land from the north to land from the southeast and how do the acreages compare. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ MARCH 8,2001 ■ PAGE 6■ Mr. Sanders said when the Sphere was amended there was more acreage added in th enorth then there was taken out in the southeast. Commissioner Mooney said that geographically trying to provide sewer and stormdrain services to the land to the east would be more difficult than the land to the north because it will generally drain north to south. Mr. Sanders said the sewage treatment plant is to the east of town. There was a brief discussion on Attachment F. He said currently the General Plan is Low Density Residential. Since the area will no longer be within the Sphere, the General Plan will be changed to Agricultural Residential. He said in Area 2 there is a small piece of land that is Low Density Residential outside of the Sphere and is proposed for Agricultural Residential designation and to maintain its current A-5 zoning. He said staff is proposing minor changes to some of the wording in the Urban Reserve zone. He said these changes are noted in Attachment I of the Report. He said the expanded Urban Reserve area is Orchard and Field Crop on the County's General Plan, but will be within the Sphere of Influence of the City of Gridley. He said there is a policy in the County's General Plan that states the County should reflect the city's land use designation within the Sphere. He said in this instance the City of Gridley's General Plan calls for continuing agriculture on the land to the north until it is annexed. Commissioner Lambert asked if this is some of the area of concern with the Agricultural Element. Mr. Parilo said the area of concern is the corridor area between Biggs and Gridley. He said in the Agricultural Element it indicates that all lands that fall within County jurisdiction within the Orchard and Field Crop area will be subject to County land use policies including the 300 foot setback. Even though there is a policy elsewhere in the General Plan that states the County shall reflect General Plan land use designations within a Sphere, relative to the Agricultural Element, that policy would apply until the land is annexed, the County's policies and regulations would apply. Mr.Meleka said regarding Commissioner Mooney's concerns about the standards within the Sphere, the new LAFCo law will set the standards within the Sphere and will ensure consistency. Commissioner Mooney said he was concerned that under the Agricultural Element implementation, that the Commission proposed provisions for a transition or buffer zone between urban and farmland designations and he did not see it in this proposal. Mr. Parilo said the new AB (Buffer Zone) does not yet exist. He said the Commission could look at lands surrounding Gridley as of the next task to figure out which lands would be appropriate for the AB zoning district. He said it raises a policy question as to how far the Commission wants to go within the Sphere area with the AB zone. Mr. Sanders said the transition zone, as he understands it, came about because there were areas that were already divided into smaller parcels that were not necessarily agriculturally viable parcels. He said in this instance LAFCo, when they amended the Sphere, applied a condition for a buffer along the north side of the new expansion area. Commissioner Lambert asked if the area, removed from the Sphere on the east side, could in the future be considered a transition or buffer zone. Mr. Parilo said it could. He said with the recommendation of SR-5, the Commission might want to consider which zones that exist today, the Commission would want to look at for applicability for the AB zone. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 MINUTES ■ MARCH 8,2001 ■ PAGE 7■ The hearing was opened to the public. Howard Hammon said he has lived in Gridley a long time. He said his 19 acre parcel should not be changed to 5 acre zoning. He said that zoning would stop development on his property. He said this proposal says to people that Gridley is a"no growth" area. He asked that the County leave this area alone. There was a brief discussion on the Urban Reserve policies. Mr. Hammon said his land should not be 5 acre zoning. He said 5 acre parcels stop growth. He said you can not sell 5 acre lots. Commissioner Leland said the intention is to hold the land until infrastructure is in place to provide services and then the land can be developed. Mr. Hammon said it all comes down to tighter restrictions. Commissioner Lambert said that in Chico and Durham, 5 acre parcels are in great demand. Cory Hammon said the report states that Gridley is for this proposal. He said that is not true. He said LAFCo stopped the original proposal. He said with this proposal there is a 40 acre net of what was put in and taken out. He said the Commission should find out what the Gridley Administration's original proposal was. He was opposed to adding any more restrictions on his land. He said Gridley is dying because people are moving away. He said there are only 20 parcels of vacant land for sale in Gridley. Shirley Stenzel, lives on the end of Sprue Street and is a kiwi grower, said she can barely make a living with 'kiwis. She said she did not want 5 acre zoning. She said that 5 acre zoning would be a hardship on her family. The hearing was closed. Mr. Sanders said the property at the end of Spruce is inside the Sphere and is subject to a 5 acre minimum because of the Urban Reserve. He said when the property is annexed to the City it would go under City zoning. Mr. Meleka said for the area outside of the Sphere one thing that is very important is to justify the 5 acre, especially in the east, is the Gridley General Plan. He said the Gridley General Plan indicates which area would be used for urbanization within the next 20 years. He said if Gridley were to plan for areas in addition to what was is in the General Plan, the area could have been put in the General Plan and they would have a plan for services, and LAFCo would ratify that, but that is not the case. It was moved by Commissioner Leland, seconded by Commissicner Lambert, and unanimously carried to recommend approval of the zoning changes and General Plan amendments discussed in the Agenda Report dated 3/8/01. Commissioner Lambert asked, if on Page 8 where it talks about the 300 foot buffer, "is it related to the Agricultural Element?" Mr. Sanders said, "yes." Mr. Sanders noted a change on Page 26, last sentence that is highlighted after "uses" add "until the." ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 MINUTES ■ MARCH 8,2001 ■ PAGE 8■ • f 1 1 This was acceptable to Commissioner Leland and Commissioner Lambert and the project was unanimously recommended for approval subject to the following findings: A. Recommend adoption of a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts to the Board of Supervisors, with the following findings: i 1. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, that said study did not identify significant environmental effects, and that a Negative Declaration is proposed. 2. Find that the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. f 3. Find, on the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study and any comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the Rezone and General Plan Amendment for Butte County Board of Supervisors,Planning Division File No. GPA/RZ 01-02 will have a significant effect on the environment. 4. Find that the proposed Negative Declaration refects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. 5. Adopt the Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts. B. Recommend a "de minimus" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The project site is not known to contain any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5. is not required. C. Recommend that the Planning Commission recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution amending the Butte County General Plan as follows with the included findings: I Land Use Man i 1. Change the land use designations on the Gridley/Biggs Land Use Map from Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential to Ag-Ticultural Residential for the lands located on the south and east side of Gridley inside and just outside the sphere of influence, shown as areas O and OO in Attachment "F." The proposed change is supported by the following findings: a. Based on the analysis in the City of Gridley's General Plan, the subject land will not be needed for urban development in the next 20 years. b. The subject land meets the Agricultural Residential site designation criteria in the Butte County Land Use Element on page LUE 51! . i . I ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING°COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ MARCH 8,2001 ■ PAGE 9■ C. The Agricultural Residential designation will act as a buffer between urban uses and intensive agricultural use consistent with Policy 2.Lf. of the Land Use Element. Urban Reserve PolicX and Map 2. Amend the Gridley Urban Reserve policy as provided in Attachment "I." 3. Amend Figure LU-4 of the Land Use Element showing the Gridley Urban Reserve area to reflect the amendments made to the SOI adopted by LAFCo on April 6, 2000, as shown in Attachment "H." These amendments are supported by the following findings a. The new Urban Reserve Boundary, including the 300-foot buffer along the interface of the new SOI boundary on the north side.of Gridley, as depicted in Attachment"H," is consistent with the Butte County General Plan because it implements the following General Plan policies and programs: LUE 1.2.a. Plan for future development of all incorporated and unincorporated areas with county boundaries. LUE 1.2.b. Consult with incorporates cities and neighboring counties in the development of planning proposals for areas of mutual concern. LUE 1.7.a. Encourage annexation to existing cities and existing districts. LUE 1.7.b. Promote the full utilization of sites served by existing public facilities. LUE 1.7.c. Encourage development in and around existing communities with public facilities. LUE 2.Lf. Allow rural residential development as a buffer between urban development and intensive crop land. AE 1.6 Work with LAFCo to create and maintain a consistent approach to the conservation of agricultural land through the designation of reasonable and logical Sphere of Influence boundaries. Support future annexations and Sphere of Influence amendments only when in compliance with the Agricultural Element and LAFCo policies and procedures. It is not the intent of this Element to preclude cities from expansion. AE 1.8 A planning area for the cities of Gridley and Biggs, which is beyond the existing Spheres of Inf uence should be defined by each city to reflect each city's area of interest. General plan amendments, Spheres of Influence modifications, and finally, annexation of those areas of interest is the legally required process. Upon annexation of the areas of interest, the city general plan and zoning will apply. Until that time, the County General Plan and zoning will apply. The County will participate in a cooperative manner in this process as requested by the 1 ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ MARCH 8,2001 ■ PAGE 10■ .a b �I cities and as County resources permit. Until annexed, the area will be designated by the County 'as productive agricultural land, and also because retention in larger tracts will be most beneficial to the cities if the land is eventually developed. AE 2.2 Encourage urban infill development within city limits and within existing unincorporated communities where development can more easily and readily be served by public infrastructure facilities. AE 2.5 Encourage urban development to the LAFCo adopted Spheres of Influence. Program AE 2.6 Utilize the LAFCo adopted Spheres of Influence for the cities and the identified unincorporated community cores as areas for urban and/or more intensive development. Restrict urban and intensive development to those areas outside agriculture and other low-intensity uses. D. Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance rezoning areas in and around the Gridley's Sphere of Influence as follows with the included findings: II 1. Rezone approximately 228 acres from SR-1 to SR-5, shown as areas (D and Z in Attachment "F." This is supported by the following findings: a. The SR-5 zone is listed as a consistent zoning designation in the Butte County General Plan for the Agricultural Residential land use designation. b. The physical characteristics of the area will support development at a density of 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres. i 2. Rezone approximately 49 acres located on the east side of Gridley from SR-1 to SR-5, shown as areas ® in Attachment "F" with the following finding: a a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly,reflecting the County's Medium Density Residential or the City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed upon this property until municipal services area available for more intense development. 3. Rezone approximately 30 acres from SR to!SR-5, located on the northwest side of Gridley, shown as areas © in Attachment "F" with the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly)reflecting the County's Medium Density Residential or the City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed on this property until'!municipal services are available to allow more intense.development. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ MARCH 8,2001 ■ PAGE 11■ 4. Rezone approximately 35 acres from SR-1 to.SR-5, shown as area O in Attachment "F" with the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's and City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed on this property until municipal services are available to allow more intense development. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ MARCH 8,2001 ■ PAGE 12■ DEPARTMET OF DEVELOPME"T SERVICES , BUTTE .>JUNTY UNIFORM APPLL%:ATION. APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME(If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ul�t r.r't vI cr VAl-1o�5 ADDRESS: CITY,STATE&ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) 2 r 0 trove 9 GPA IZEZ 01-002. NAME OF PROPOSED kOJECT(If any) TELEPHONE �5'� ) 538-lbal LOCATION OF PROJECT(Major cross streets and Address, if any) 11 av-e C { 4 - GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED F OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE VAR1oVS ( ) t1 ADDRESS: CITY,STATE&ZIP CODE: lel �Pr . ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE(in Square Feet or Acres) ✓(,l�-1 MJS VG�'too S AG / Rv u 2E5tDE#JT1AL EXISTING STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) (Check One) (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER hi APPLICATION REQUESTED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP REZONE ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ USE PERMIT .��r e ems, r ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT p . ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ VARIANCE U ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ MINOR VARIANCE s' 4 ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERNUTq J 0 MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN 12❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT JUN 2Q00 C3 OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT(Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division,describe the number and size of parcels.) VA el mu S 6-,- &I &-,4 h 1 a-vv\e.A hw ✓l u rt Gn 5 VAW4 ol 1-4 lueyace le 112 b. L cb . ao 001- OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER,I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized,execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.) DATE: SIGNATURE: AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; Print Name of Agent and Phone Number Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Print Name Print Name Signature Signature Archit,!ct and/or Engineer: Print Name of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: Total Amount Received: AP Number(s) Legal Description Owners Authorization Zoning Requirements Project Description Copies of plot plan- Taken by Receipt No. E.H. LD Plan FD Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $ as of Make check payable to"Butte County Treasurer". COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) i Date Filed General Information: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or project sponsor: 2. Address of project: Assessor's Parcel Number: 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional,state and federal agencies:' it 5. Existing general plan designation: 6. Existing zoning district: 7. How is land currently used? l ,I 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): it i I Project Description: �a 9.. . Site size: (Acres/Sq. Feet) 1 'I j 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes—No _ 12. Proposed development schedule 13. Associated projects 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development '.f Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential,include the number of units,schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. it 16. If commercial, indicate the type,whether neighborhood,city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial,indicate type, estimated employment per shift,and loading facilities. 18. If institutional,indicate the major function,estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,loading facilities,and community benefits to be derived from the project. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 1 19. . If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning :application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. 22. Change in pattem or character of general area of project. 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. 25. Change in bay, lake, river,stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire,water, sewage, etc. including special districts). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division D 2 i Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties,including information cn plants and animals and any cultural, historical,or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.),intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses,shops,department stores, etc.), and scale of development(height, frontage,set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements fumished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signature for K:\FORMS\SUBMITTAL\ENV-INFO 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 3 rROJECT REVIEW CHECKL 'T Project Planners fill out this in-house checklist upon receipt of a new project. Project Number: Project/Application Name: Project Site Zoning: - General Plan Designation: APN: Project Planner: Date completed: Is the project located within any of the following areas? ❑ North Chico Specific Plan ❑ Oroville Enterprise Zone ❑ Williamson Act Land CLCA: ACRES: ❑ 100 Year Flood Plain ❑ Within FEMA Floodway ❑ Within DWR Floodway ❑ Dam Inundation Area ❑ Watershed Protection Overlay Zone ❑ East Avenue Specific Plan ❑ Chico Area Greenline (Project in area where Greenline policies apply) ❑ Greater Chico Area Redevelopment Area ❑ Nitrate Action Plan Area ❑ Archaeological Sensitive Area ' ❑ Hazardous Site ❑ Other Critical of Sensitive Area ❑ Planning Areas ❑ Urban Reserve ❑ Durham-Dayton-Nelson Planning Area ❑ Paradise Urban Reserve ❑ Oroville Area Land Use Plan(Adopted 3/29/84) ❑ Oroville Urban Reserve ❑ Chico Area Land Use Plan(Adopted 3/18/90) ❑ Chico Urban Reserve ❑ Gridley-Biggs Land Use Plan(Adopted 8/586 ❑ Gridley Urban Reserve ❑ Honcut Area ❑ Cohasset Area ❑ Palermo Area ❑ Chapman/Mulberry Planning Area(in process of adoption 9-14-99) ❑ Deer Herd Areas ❑ Designated Development Zone ❑ Winter Range ❑ Critical Winter Range ❑ Summer Range ❑ Critical Summer Range ❑ Major Migration Corridor ❑ Intermediate Deer Range ❑ If Constrained, The Minimum Parcel Size Is acres. ❑ CLUP Area ❑ AIRPORT AREA OF INFLUENCE ❑ Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan ❑ Chico ❑ Paradise Skypark ❑ Paradise Skypark ❑ Ranchero ❑ Ranchero ❑ Oroville ❑ Oroville ❑ Airport Land Use Commission Review(ALUC) Required ❑. Urban Area(As definea in Improvement Standards for Chapter m) ❑ City of Chico ❑ Durham ❑ City of Gridley ❑ City of Oroville ❑ Mountain Recreational Area ❑ Sphere of Influence ❑ City of Chico ❑ City of Gridley ❑ City of Oroville ❑ City of Biggs ❑ City of Paradise ❑ Watershed Areas ❑ Butte Creek ❑ Cherokee ❑ Big Chico Creek ❑ Wyman Ravine Study Area ❑ Little Chico Creek ❑ Rock Creek Study Area ❑ Sacramento River Conservation(SB1086) Essential Services ❑ Public Water District ❑ Well(s) ❑ Public Sewer District ❑ On-site Sewer If well and/or on-site sewage disposal,has Environmental Health determined the application filing requirements? ❑ Pre-application review complete ❑ Pre-application review not required ❑ Drainage District/CSA ❑ Fire District ❑ Butte County ❑ El Medio Fire District ❑ Federal Aid Roads) ❑ Other Permits required from other agencies Agency Special Review ❑ Department of Water Resources (DWR) ❑ Office of Mine Reclamation ❑ Department of Fish and Game(DFG) ❑ Department of Fish and Game ❑ CALTRANS ❑ HCD (Mobile Home Parks) ❑ Regional Water Quality Control Board ❑ Other ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Butte County Air Quality Control District ❑ Other Comments: Version:9/28/99 C:UNy DocumentsTROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST.doc APPLICATION ACTIVITY LOG Action* Person Contacted** Phone Number** Time Spent/Date *Use more than one line if necessary. **If applicable. APPLICATION ACTIVITY LOG K:IAPPLICATION ACTIVITY LOG.cbc 7 009-021-012 024-281-010 024-070-021 1180 OHIO STREET LP ALCANTAR RICHARD C ANDES GARY P&MARNA 21 CORBETT COURT 261 OBERMEYER AVE 23 PERRY AVE NAPA CA 945582500 GRIDLEY CA 95948 BIGGS CA 95917 021-330-024 021-080-087 022-340-019 ACEVEDO ABEL& SILVIA ALEXANDER PAUL A ANDREASEN MARY K SS 346 PARADOX DR 1897 SYCAMORE STREET 1767 W BIGGS GRIDLEY ROAD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-260-066 022-330-025 024-260-009 ADAMS CARMELITA TR ALLISON GEORGE H&LOUISE G ANDROUS RICHARD L 1872 SYCAMORE STREET 1801 W BIGGS GRIDLEY RD 33 ARCHER AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-054-002 009-055-001 021-330-045 ADAMS KATHLEEN SUE ALMO EUGENE RICHARD ANGEL GREGORIO&MARCELINA V 983 OREGON ST 980 INDIANA ST 330 LITTLE AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 9 (1 Q21 n1 A 009-210-013 022-340-023 <CA959 ALMO MANUEL JR&JULIANA ANGELO JOHN A&LOIS E JT PO PDLEY 1230 BRIDGEFORD AVE P 0 BOX 638 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-070-051 024-010-007 021-070-108 ADAMS MELVA L REV TRUST AMOS JACK&DART ANGUTANO JOSE R&MARIA ELENA 1413 RANDOLPH AVE 280 EAST GRIDLEY RD 300 KENTUCKY ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-250-025 024-282-008 021-250-006 AGAPIADES SHARON&ATHANASIOS AMOS JACK S ANGUTANO ROY 1367 RICHINS AVE 307 OBERMEYER AVE 1357 LOSSER AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-012-015 021-270-017 021-340-006 AGUIRRE JAVIER M&BEATRICE S ANDERS EARL F REVOCABLE TRUST ANGULO VALENTIN&MARIA CONSU 1463 DOUGLAS STREET P O BOX 713 1447 INDIANA ST SAN JOSE CA 95126 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 959483211 024-030-029 021-280-014 022-260-067 AGUSTIN JUAN ANTONIO& SUSANA T ANDERSON DOUGLAS M&KELLY ANNE ANTES CARMELITA ADAMS 1572 GILSTRAP AVE 320 BUTTE VIEW DR 1872 SYCAMORE ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-070-005 0-102-004 021-340-010 ALCANTAR JESUS D& GUADALUPE R AND SON JERO ARELLANO LUIS 18 OBERMEYER AVENUE 165 IND T 271 YEW ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 DLEY CA 959 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-103-007 009-091-001 010-125-001 ARIAS JACINTO C BAKER SUSAN BARRINGTON DELIA 120 INDIANA ST 849 IDAHO ST 863 CEDAR ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 9-093-001 009-171-001 022-260-043 RONG WILL & STACIE L BAKKUM KEVIN& SALLY BARROW BETTY JENSEN LIVING TRU 1604 PEA 1819 HAZEL ST 1719 W BIGGS GRIDLEY RD LEY CA 95 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-112-015 021-240-003 021-070-024 ARNOLD ADA BELLE BALLARD CHESTER W&BETTY J JT BARTSCHI PAUL E&IRENE S REV IN P 0 BOX 735 16 EVELYN DR 2134 VIA MONTECITO GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 CAMARILLO CA 93012 024-260-046 021-070-087 021-110-032 ARTHUR JESSE L&JUDITH A REV TRU BANES JAMES B&COLLEEN A BEALE WILLIAM H&LYNETT 2356 N CROWN RD 3022 LARKIN RD 3000 DORLAINE CT MERCED CA 95340 BIGGS CA 95917 SACRAMENTO CA 95821 009-093-006 024-290-008 424a6Q1L— ASBURY JESS BANKS RANSOM P&VIRGINIA D LIVIN >2415 EDWI<C65 A&I P 0 BOX 122 59 HOLLIS LN LIVE OAK CA 95953 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-010-111 024-070-011 024-260-008 ASSEMBLIES OF GOD NO CA&NV DIST BANUELOS ODILON E&CAROLINA BEHR JOHN R& SARAH C P 0 BOX 914 1877 AYERS AVE 47 ARCHER AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-051-022 021-340-024 024-055-009 AVALOS RAFAEL BANUELOS SAMUEL BEHUNIN OTTO E&KATHRYN D 545 SAGE ST 1436 INDIANA STREET 204 SHELDON AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-022-009 021-330-008 010-101-001 AVITIA ROSALIO&FRANCISCA BARAJAS J JESUS&JOSEFINA F BENNETT ARTHUR MICHAEL 1740 MONTANA AVE 336 SCARLET OAK P 0 BOX 738 SHASTA LAKE CITY CA 96019 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-120-014 009-172-001 022-260-016 AZEVEDO DENETTE R BARBEE ROBERT L&LOIS J BENNETT ARTHUR MICHAEL&GAIL 165 KENTUCKY ST P 0 BOX 2000 P 0 BOX 738 GRIDLEY CA 95948 SO LAKE TAHOE CA 961512000 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-094-005 009-210-029 022-340-025 BACK ROBERT OWEN&MARY JO FAM BARBER SKIPPER L&DIANA L BENNETT RICHARD F&HELEN D 1800 SPRUCE ST 1390 BRIDGEFORD AVE 1775 W BIGGS GRIDLEY RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 i 009-095-008 09-131-011 024-290-006 BERGMAN ROGER L&NEDRA J EL PETER J&C L BREITAG PAUL Q& SANDRA K JT P 0 BOX 654 659 ID 45 HOLLIS LANE GRIDLEY CA 95948 LEY CA 9 8 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-054-040 024-260-006 022-340-007 BERNARD GEORGE R&GILBERTA E BLAKEMAN JAMES EDMUND BREY DUANE W&ALBERTA B 294 OBERMEYER AVE 77 ARCHER AVE 440 JUSTESON ROAD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 0- 021-280-020 022-330-001 BESX112-014 HEL BOEGER MICHAEL E& SANDRA G BROCK FAMILY TRUST 124 P 0 BOX 36 18 ROSITA WAY DL EY CA 95 GRIDLEY CA 95948 OROVILLE CA 95966 010-112-004 >693 1 024-270-020 BETTENCOURT STANLEY D&ANDRET UR S TRUST ETAL BROKAW DARRELL L&ELSIE M JT 1125 CEDAR ST ST 62 SHELDON AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 CA 95 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-110-076 022-330-005 010-011-010 BIG VALLEY CHEMICAL COMPANY BOEGER-TERRY MONICA L BRONNER EDWARD C P 0 BOX 926 467 MACEDO ROAD 422 IDAHO ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-330-014 021-080-053 022-240-140 BIGGS RODGER BOELMAN CARL E&JENNIE A BROWN DONALD E&JOANNE L 1145 HAZEL ST P 0 BOX 646 454 MACEDO RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 BIGGS CA 95917 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-022-011 009-012-019 2-240-121 BIGGS RODGER V BORGES LINDA BRO MARK ENE L 1145 HAZEL ST 2000 CENTERVILLE RD 1889 GRIDLEY RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 FERNDALE CA 95536 LEY CA 959 021-310-011 024-270-004 024-020-019 BIGGS STEVEN A BORGES RAY BROWN RAYMOND ALFRED ETAL TC 2022 JAY DR 422 TURNER AVE 4448 COUNTY ROAD 895 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 PRINCETON TX 75407 022-240-040 024-270-029 021-270-032 BIGGS WEST GRIDLEY WATER DISTRICT BORGES RAYMOND BRYAN DOUGLAS D&KATHLEEN M 00000 422 TURNER AVE 90 WEST LIBERTY ROAD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-010-036 024-290-027 021-330-029 BJORKLUND FAMILY TRUST BOWDEN LANNY G& SALLY N BUCK MERLY OMANDAM 1428 GILSTRAP AVE 6791 TERRENO DR 335 PARADOX DR GRIDLEY CA 95948 RANCHO MURIETA CA 95683 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-270-047 024-260-048 021-330-026 BURBANK FAMILY TRUST C&R PROPERTIES CANDELARIO ANTONIO N& SOFIA 121 SHELDON AVE 2565 ZANELLA WAY SUITE C 336 PARADOX DR GRIDLEY CA 95948 CHICO CA 95928 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-112-016 024-281-005 010-093-014 BURDICK HOWARD&LARETA A CADY H V&MARY I IT CARDONA JOSE 177 BUTTE AVE 1369 GILSTRAP 172 OREGON ST YUBA CITY CA 959939367 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-282-007 024-020-001 021-340-007 BURLESON ELIZABETH NORMA CAL GAS WEST INC CARMONA MIGUEL 317 OBERMEYER AVENUE P 0 BOX 798 1451 INDIANA ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 VALLEY FORGE PA 19482 GRIDLEY CA 95948 1-280-002 009-210-032 010-093-005 B ON WILLI UST CALDWELL FAMILY TRUST CARMONA SEVERIANO G&MARIA C 216 L WAY 860 NAUTILUS CT 145 CALIFORNIA ST Y CREEK CA 69785 YUBA CITY CA 95991 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-270-040 010-200-002 021-070-071 BUSCH JOHN G& SHARON K IT CALDWELL TWIGG D&MARGUERITE CARTER GARY DEAN&AUDREY JANE 23 SHELDON AVENUE P 0 BOX 787 1581 PALM LN GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 025-200-036 021-270-019 024-290-012 BUTTE WATER DISTRICT CALLAWAY WILLIAM H&JANELLE M CARTER REX B&MARY R 00000 P 0 BOX 513 89 HOLLIS LN GRIDLEY CA 95948 BIGGS CA 95917 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-260-044 009-013-016 024-260-069 BUTTERFIELD GORDON J&VALERIE B CAMPBELL PATRICIA A CARTNER GARLAND P&FRANKYE B 1717 W BIGGS GRIDLEY RD 1140 VERMONT ST 156 BLUE BIRD LANE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-030-023 1-080-056 >CASONG BYNUM WILLIAM 0&VICTORIA(CB D C L R W&THERES ES. <959 D 1561 BOND LN 100 BLAC DR GRIDLEY CA 95948 LLE CA 9458 024-010-099 0-112-017 022-260-056 BYRNE EVERETT E C GUILLERMO CASILLAS JOAN MARIE&ERNEST A JT 180 ARCHER AVE 1061 SAG 1898 SYCAMORE GRIDLEY CA 95948 DLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-010-100 021-310-007 024-010-041 BYRNE EVERETT E&MEREDITH CAMPTON THOMAS C&MARJORIE F CP CASSADY RALPH R SR 180 ARCHER AVE 2029 JAY DR 335 E GRIDLEY RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 025-200-019 024-260-015 021-070-097 CASSADY RALPH RICHARD CLARK EDWARD B&BARBARA L IT COMMUNITY HOUSING IMPROVEME 335 E GRIDLEY ROAD 124 EAST GRIDLEY ROAD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-020-020 021-070-090 022-330-022 CASTANEDA ISAURO&MARIA R COBEEN VILAS D&BEULAH CONKLIN DENNIS N&ROSE L P 0 BOX 635 652 LITTLE AVE 1817 W BIGGS GRIDLEY RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-270-035 022-240-138 024-090-066 CASTILLON JOSE R&LUZ S COE FAMILY TRUST COOK BRIAN C 2242 ANITA ST 465 JUSTESON ROAD P 0 BOX 1052 LIVE OAK CA 95953 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-013-009 009-210-033 010-250-033 CASTLEMAN RALF P&DEBBIE LYNN COE TAMARA COOPER ELSIE A 3301 BLUERIDGE DRIVE 1240 VAN DE MARK CT 365 IDAHO ST NORMAN OK 73026 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-270-039 024-060-012 010-112-013 CATE DAVID N&ELIZABETH A IT COFFEY KENNETH COPELIN DWAYNE&DIANA J 363 LAUREL AVENUE 1162 HWY 99 110 PARK ST NOVATO CA 94947 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-112-008 024-290-028 009-054-007 CEZARIO VICKI ANN COFFEY KENNETH LEE REV LIV TRUST CORONADO ERIC DOUG& SHIRLEIGH 1102 LOCUST ST 1162 HWY 99 959 OREGON ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 025-200-059 009-092-006 009-171-002 CHAMBERS BETTY J REVOCABLE TRUST COGHLAN PATRICK J& SALLY J COULARTE ALVIN&CECILIA 1572 GLENN ELLEN DR P 0 BOX 1037 PO BOX 906 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-260-064 010-210-038 010-210-028 CHESWORTH DONALD W&MARILYN S COLBURN EVERETT L JR&MARY P COUNTY OF BUTTE 427 JUSTESON RD 27 E GRIDLEY RD#A 00000 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 LOS ANGELES CA 90015 024-8:9-998 009-132-007 024-010-042 JOS COLE BEVERLY E* CRABTREE BILL&DAYLE 1895 RS AVE 664 IDAHO ST P 0 BOX 792 DLEY CA GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-051-001 021-340-028 022-340-016 CITY OF GRIDLEY COMBS BRIAN K&KATHLEEN A KELL CRAIG FAMILY TRUST 00000 249 SPICETREE ST 1787 W BIGGS GRIDLEY RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-094-004 021-330-009 021-240-021 CRATER HELEN E DE OCHOA EDUARDO&MA ELENA C DEWSNUP BEATRICE 1872 SPRUCE ST 330 SCARLET OAK DR P 0 BOX 755 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-310-003 021-280-007 022-340-005 CRAWFORD FAMILY TRUST DEAN GEORGE L&LINDA L DEWSNUP CHRIS M&ROBIN 2013 JAY DRIVE 403 BUTTE VIEW DR P 0 BOX 987 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-011-012 1-100-009 021-240-016 CURTIS RUSSELL A&KAREN S DE R CLAREN DEWSNUP CRAIG&MICHELE 460 IDAHO ST 2550 TE A 179 LITTLE AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 CO CA 959 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-051-023 009-021-013 010-121-005 DADDOW DAVID B &JANIE DEHOFF CATHERINE M DEWSNUP CRAIG H&MICHELE 143 OBERMEYER AVE 1190 OHIO ST 179 LITTLE AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-330-023 010-111-007 021-240-018 DALRYMPLE MARK D&CINDY M DEHOFF CONNIE DEWSNUP CRAIG H&MICHELE E 425 MACEDO ROAD 245 VERMONT 179 LITTLE AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-100-027 024-260-035 021-240-024 DALTON BART D DELATORRE JUAN SR&ESTHER REV I DEWSNUP CRAIG H&MICHELE E CP 288 LITTLE AVE P 0 BOX 1230 179 LITTLE AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-055-033 021-280-041 021-240-017 DALTON M D&MILDRED DELATORRE LUZ DEWSNUP MARK P&ANNE L 252 SHELDON AVENUE 305 BUTTE VIEW DR 197 LITTLE AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-190-026 021-280-004 021-170-040 DANDREA JOSEPH& SHARRON DELONG ROBIN R DEWSNUP MARK PIKE&ANNE 2360 MYERS ST 2001 SYCAMORE ST 199 W LIBERTY OROVILLE CA 95966 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-022-007 1-080-061 024-054-002 DAVIS WILLIAM H&MARLENE A DE R PHILIP ALBERT DHILLON MANJIT S&KULWINDER 1840 HAZEL ST 1898 MAG 1056 JACKSON ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 CAdDLEY CA 9594 GRIDLEY CA 95948 ASA-02L-QLi, 009-210-043 022-340-014 LA TO JUAN SR&EST I DEMEYER WANDA Q P R TRUST DIN HENRY F&BETTY J PO BO 8 G 1141 OREGON ST 480 JUSTESON ROAD Y CA 9 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 i 009-094-007 024-010-008 024-260-071 DIXON JEFFREY HARPER& CYDNEY A DUKES BARBARA REVOCABLE TRUST EARL MAYME C(LE) 755 IDAHO ST 1555 GILSTRAP AVE 139 ARCHER AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-120-017 024-054-048 024-260-072 DOMENIGONI DON&CAMELLIA DUKES CLARICE K EARL R DENNIS &BARBARA J JT 180 VERMONT ST P 0 BOX 1027 139 ARCHER AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 BROOKINGS OR 97415 GRIDLEY CA 95948 034-0 '038 1-280-023 010-112-010 721EGO IER TEDM&CD EDWIN EDWARDS MICHAEL L JR&TAVITA 305 H AVE 1130 LOCUST ST CA 92 1 LEY CA 8 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-022-013 009-013-017 022-240-123 DONOHO GEORGE A REVOCABLE TRUST DUNLAP RICHARD JAMES&RHONDA S EHORN THOMAS A&RUTH D 13470 CIRBY RD 1060 BRIDGEFORD ST 418 MACEDO OROVILLE CA 95965 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-012-018 024-070-023 024-260-063 DOSSER IRA DANIEL&ALYENE DUNN AUDREY M* ELGAAEN GRACE M INTER VIVOS RE 1150 INDIANA ST 1872 AYERS AVE 136 BLUE BIRD LN GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-093-006 010-103-004 1-100-043 DOUGLAS JOHNNY RAY&ARTHULA ,P DURAN JOE& SHANNON ELL STEVEN J SR&JE 125 CALIFORNIA ST 137 PARK ST 1199 DI APT 155 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 C 0 CA 95973 021-240-011 009-051-006 024-090-063 DRAINAGE DISTRICT 2056 DUREN DONALD J&ANTONETTE TRUST EPP CHARLES A JR&DARLENE 00000 1225 RICHINS AVE 1098 99E HWY GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-290-023 010-101-006 024-010-092 DUBOIS FAMILY TRUST DUSTIN FAMILY TRUST ERICKSON DALE M&BETTY J FAMIL 30 HOLLIS LANE 115 MAIN ST 219 ARCHER AVENUE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-190-009 021-132-039 2-340-006 DUBOSE BENJAMIN C&JOYCE D DUTRA FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST ERI ON MICHAEL OLYN E 4265 MARKLEY ROAD 629 WEST A STREET 432 JUST YUBA CITY CA 95993 DIXON CA 95620 DLEY CA 959 024-260-082 009-011-010 024-020-021 DUGAN AUDREY A SS DUTRA MYRTLE M REVOCABLE LIVIN ERICKSON ROLAND D&MARLENA F 1473 BONNELL AVE 325 OREGON ST 62 ARCHER AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-250-004 009-052-005 021-110-036 EVANS BOBBIE LEE&SYLVIA JEAN FERREIRA ANTHONY LEE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF GRIDLEY 267 LITTLE AVE 730 PECAN ST SP 50 100 VERMONT ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 W SACRAMENTO CA 95691 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-330-009 9-131-010 024-054-031 EVANS SUSAN GAIL FES AMOZRIDLEYRD E L FISHER HUGH J&GERALDINE K JT 439 MACEDO AVE 1640 W B 262 OBERMEYER AVENUE GRIDLEY CA 95948 LEY CA 959 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-080-049 010-210-040 021-340-018 EVERETT EDWARD J&FLORA L FFCA CAPITAL HOLDING CORPORATION FLORES CIRILO&MARTHA V 1899 MAGNOLIA ST 17207 N PERIMETER DR 1435 BOWWOOD STREET GRIDLEY CA 95948 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85255 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-280-036 021-100-007 010-102-007 FALLESEN BARRY L& SANDRA K JT FICHTER ROBERT KENNETH&JERRY A FLORES JOSEPH B&VIRGINIA REV T 309 BUTTE VIEW DRIVE 1391 LOSSER AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 959489599 009-101-008 021-270-035 -290-004 FALLESEN FAMILY TRUST FIFE FAMILY TRUST FOLTZ NE J REVOC UST 890 OREGON ST 148 W LIBERTY RD 29 HOLLIS GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 EY CA 95948 024-070-024 009-021-015 010-120-006 FARGEN LESLIE M FIFE GARY D&JONNA D FONTAINE WAYNE K&CAROL S 1878 AYERS AVENUE P 0 BOX 427 154 OHIO ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-080-060 021-270-027 009-131-009 FARR MICHAEL W& SHARON C FIFE ROBERT ALLEN&MARJORIE K FOUNTAIN AGNES L 406 RANDOLPH AVE 130 WEST LIBERTY RD 645 IDAHO ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-100-026 021-250-001 021-270-034 FERGUSON CARL E FILLMORE GERALD A&BRIT L FRANCIS&WALTERS TRUCKING PO BOX 133 540 VERMONT ST P 0 BOX 561 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-210-012 021-170-053 022-230-001 FERGUSON NELDA FILTER JAMES R TRUST FRANCIS DONALD B&JULIA S 1251 BRIDGEFORD 23 HURLBURT LN 1790 W BIGGS GRIDLEY RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-093-007 024-260-005 010-101-007 FERGUSON WAYNE FINDLEY ROBERT&MARY FRANCIS MAE G 865 OREGON STREET P 0 BOX 692 1440 LOCUST ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 1 1, 021-070-012 024-260-002 Q24-242-%fr FRANDRUP WILLIAM B& GENEVIEVE GARIGLIANO PATRICIA H LISSON VIRGI PO BOX 462 1481 BONNELL AVENUE 323 O YER AVENUE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 DLEY CA 009-012-020 010-102-013 010-093-004 FRASER MARGOT SUSAN GARNER FAMILY TRUST GLOVER WALTER L 2951 WRIGHT ST 120 MAINE ST 165 CALIFORNIA ST SACRAMENTO CA 95821 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-011-009 010-112-003 021-100-049 FRATES BETTY L REVOCABLE INTER V GASTINEAU CLYDE.L TRUST GMUCA FRANK ANDREW&LINDA S 1195 INDIANA ST 120 OREGON ST 1155 LOCUST ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-240-002 024-070-032 021-070-076 FRENCH DALE FRANKLIN&EVELYN GATELY BARBARA JEAN GOLDEN WEST FARMS 14 EVELYN DRIVE 1261 LOSSER AVE 1719 W BIGGS GRIDLEY RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-290-017 - 021-070-102 1-330-030 FUHRMAN FAMILY TRUST GATELY JOHN A&BARBARA J GO EZ ALFONS ERANZA 74 HOLLIS LN 1261 LOSSER AVE 339 P R GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 LEY CA 95 025-200-114 >1544T 3 021-340-015 FULLER EVERETT L SS <9594 GONZALEZ FELIPE 1013 FAIRVIEW DR 1459 BOWWOOD STREET GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-020-024 021-080-081 022-240-035 GAMMON LILLIAN T REVOCABLE TRU, GERST FRED SS PPT GOSAL MALKIAT SINGH&HARBHAJ 92 ARCHER AVE 1860 LAUREL STREET 94 TOWNSHIP RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-054-005 021-080-070 022-210-020 GARCIA JUDITH A GERST REGINALD GOSAL MALKIAT SINGH 911 OREGON ST 1898 LAUREL ST 94 TOWNSHIP ROAD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 -250-008 021-080-054 022-330-007 G R GERST REGINALD SEPARATE PROPERT GRANT LEE CHARLOTTE SS 1370 S AVE 1,898 LAUREL ST 453 MACEDO RD LEY CA 9 8 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-092-014 024-060-007 024-054-037 GAREWALL SHAYNE C GHAG LAKHVIR S&AMARJIT K GRAVEL EARL P&CATHERINE 145 OREGON ST 2760 PLUM ST 272 OBERMEYER AVENUE GRIDLEY CA 95948 LIVE OAK CA 95953 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-310-010 - - 010-210-033 GREGORY WALLACE E&ROSEMARY GUTI Z J GUAD E HANSEN SARAH L 2026 JAY DR 2390 GRE ST 33 E GRIDLEY RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 LLE CA 95966 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-270-017 010420-008 021-310-014 GRIDLEY GRANGE FOUR FIFTY SEVEN HAGBERG FAMILY TRUST HARKEY FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 11222 LOMA RICA RD 340 NIELSON AVENUE P 0 BOX 927 MARYSVILLE CA 95901 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-260-049 009-092-005 009-011-004 GRIDLEY OAKS HAGEMAN WILLIAM R&BARBARA E HARMON JOHN L 610 FULTON AVENUE 808 IDAHO ST 1141 INDIANA ST SACRAMENTO CA 95825 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-260-015 024-290-024 022-330-010 GRIDLEY SARAH G HAGMAN MICHAEL D&CHRISTINA A HARO EARNEST&TINA L 930 ROEDER WAY 24 HOLLIS LANE P 0 BOX 271 SACRAMENTO CA 95822 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-070-033 024-290-016 010-120-005 GRIDLEY UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT HALL MARC H&SUSANNE K HARP 1989 REVOCABLE TRUST 00000 82 HOLLIS LN 991 CEDAR ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-210-031 022-240-017 021-280-039 GRIDLEY WAREHOUSES HAMBLIN TERRY L&COLLEEN M HARSHBARGER KEITH H&MARGAR P 0 BOX 365 1445 VERMONT ST 403 RANDOLPH AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-280-006 024-010-106 021-110-041 GUEGLIO ANGELO L FAMILY TRUST HAMMAN HOWARD B&FLORENCE K HAWES ROBERT C&MIYUKI N FAMI 405 BUTTE VIEW DR 242 EAST GRIDLEY RD 1426 VERMONT ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-310-015 021-340-014 021-290-025 GUERRERO ETHELWOLDO P&EUN JU J HAMMONS LORI E HAY BILLY D&ROBERTA M 2006 JAY DR 249 YEW STREET 1470 RANDOLPH AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-010-094 010-092-016 024-290-005 GUHL ROYCE&EDNA HANKINS ROBERT I&LORNA HAYNES CLIFFORD D& SANDRA L(C 210 SYCAMORE STREET 114 NEVADA ST 37 HOLLIS LN GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-100-053 009-012-002 022-240-104 GUTIERREZ CHARLIE&NANCY F HANNER JOHN W&BETTY L HAYNES REVOCABLE TRUST 1419 VERMONT ST P 0 BOX 811 440 MACEDO RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-210-042 022-260-041 021-080-080 HEAPE ROBERT D&PATTINELL HIGGINS MERLENE TRUST HUFFMAN WILLIAM V JR& SHEILA J 3554 YORKTOWN DR 1735 W BIGGS GRIDLEY RD 1880 MAGNOLIA ST YUBA CITY CA 95991 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-340-010 022-230-022 024-060-009 HENDERSON ROBERT N&NANCY J HILBERS PROPERTIES HUGHBANKS WARREN M&LOIS E ET 456 JUSTESON ROAD 871 VON GELDERN WAY 57 0BERMEYER GRIDLEY CA 95948 YUBA CITY CA 95991 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-270-015 022-240-093 021-080-051 HENDERSON RUSSELL C HOFER ADOLPH&RUBY L LIVING TRU HUGHES CLAUDIA A* 1230 HWY 99 1618 KOFFORD RD 1830 MAGNOLIA ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-080-009 010-101-011 024-260-070 HEPWORTH MERCEDES C HOLLANDSWORTH ROBERT L& SHIRL HUGHES JOSEPH P&MARGARET DES 245 VERMONT ST 162 CALIFORNIA ST P 0 BOX 211 GRIDLEY CA 959482945 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-091-014 009-012-010 010-103-006 HEREDIA ISIDRO&IMELDA HOOGEVEEN RICHARD D HUNTER GREGORY&LISA 137 NEVADA ST 1529 LEWIS OAK ROAD 1205 FRENCH AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-340-023 010-120-018 021-080-030 HEREDIA ROBERTO C&FRANCISCA HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY HUNZEKER NICHOLAS C&MARIA E 1428 INDIANA STREET 580 VALLOMBROSA AVE 1830 LAUREL ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 CHICO CA 95926 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-340-002 024-270-022 024-070-022 HERNANDEZ SALVADOR M&MARIA D HOWARD BARBARA A IBARRA ELEAZAR&ZUNI 1411 INDIANA 78 SHELDON AVE 1866 AYERS AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-101-010 021-080-088 021-100-041 HERRERA A A&REFUGIO E HOWELL LEWIS D IGLESIA GENTIL DE CRISTO 124 CALIFORNIA ST 1895 SYCAMORE STREET 1133 LOCUST STREET GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-022-012 021-080-072 009-021-002 HEWITT ARTHUR E JR HOWELL LOIS L LIVING TRUST JACQUOT BERNARD F P 0 BOX 28 350 RANDOLPH AVE 1191 KENTUCKY ST MARYSVILLE CA 95901 GRIDLEY CA 959489514 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-055-031 021-250-022 021-100-045 HIBBS FAMILY TRUST HUBBER HOMER JACQUOT ROBERT E 262 SHELDON AVE 271 LITTLE ST 1139 LOCUST ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-210-026 024-051-015 021-080-089 JAMES WILLIAM ALAN&PAMELA ANN JOHNSON ADELINE JUSTESON AVA LEE REVOCABLE TR 1360 BRIDGEFORD AVE 203 OBERMEYER P 0 BOX 970 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 BERRY CREEK CA 95916 021-110-026 021-080-065 009-210-025 JANUARY GEORGE J&MILDRED R JOHNSON BRUCE E& CHRISTINE L JUSTESON GARY P 0 BOX 611 1895 MAGNOLIA ST 1340 BRIDGEFORD CT GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-013-004 009-210-010 021-280-005 JARNAGIN BERNICE L JOHNSON DANIEL M&CHERYL L KAELIN DOUGLAS & STACI 1175 OHIO ST 1231 BRIDGEFORD AVE 407 BUTTE VIEW DR GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-093-010 022-330-016 024-090-070 JASSO RAMON G&LEONOR JOHNSON GEORGE W&KIMBERLY KALKAT AMARIK&MOHINDER 329 E EVANS REIMER RD 1809 W BIGGS GRIDLEY HWY 2403 BRUBAKER ROAD GRIDLEY CA 959489330 GRIDLEY CA 95948 LIVE OAK CA 95953 024-070-007 022-240-018 024-290-011 JAUREGUI J ASUNCION&MARGARITA JOHNSON JAYLENE D KALKAT SATNAM S 28 OBERMEYER AVENUE 517 MACEDO RD 81 HOLLIS LN GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-340-026 022-340-003 JAUREGUI RAMON&TERESA DE J5DLEY OHN L E KAWASAKI EDWARD ROY 259 SPICETREE ST 416 JUSTESON AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 A 959 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-290-007 021-100-033 024-010-098 JEFFER.S KEVIN E& SUSAN J JOHNSON LARRY K&MELBA J KEEN CURT&LINDA M(CB DVA) 906 GILSTRAP AVE 1501 LOCUST STREET 292 ARCHER AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 959482825 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-270-052 024-290-015 010-103-012 JENKINS FAMILY TRUST JONES GORDON T& SONYA L KELLETT ROY D&THELDA K 145 SHELDON AVE 90 HOLLIS LANE P 0 BOX 492 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-290-019 021-100-001 010-101-002 JENKINS RONALD L&LELA M JONES ROBERT&CAROL KELLETT TROY W&CHARLOTTE L 60 HOLLIS LN 1555 LOCUST ST 1455 CEDAR ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-290-024 021-080-085 010-121-006 JENNINGS LARRY R&MOLLY A JONES WILLIAM A&MARGIE M KEPLER CHARLES R&PEGGY LEE 462 BAYBERRY WAY 410 RANDOLPH RD 240 VERMONT ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-240-027 009-021-017 021-290-023 KHAN ABDUL GHAFOOR KING ROBERT H LANGDON SAMMY R&NANCY A 530 JUSTESON RD P 0 BOX 342 458 BAYBERRY WAY GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-330-012 021-080-086 010-093-007 KHAN MOHAM AD ASLAM& SHAZIA N KING ROBERT H SS LARA FAUSTO TORRES&DELIA G 339 SCARLET OAK DR P 0 BOX 342 115 CALIFORNIA ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-340-027 022-240-128 021-100-052 KHAN MUHAM1vIED S&TAHIRA P KIWI ACRES OF CALIFORNIA LATTIN ROBERT L&GLORIA S 255 SPICETREE ST 548 FIRESIDE CT 770 OREGON ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 WALNUT CREEK CA 945982503 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-270-010 009-210-017 010-190-024 KHAN RASHEED A KNAPP JOANNE L LAUHER KENNETH M& CAROL ANN 190 W LIERTY RD 1320 BRIDGEFORD P 0 BOX 910 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 LAGUNA BEACH CA 92651 024-290-002 010-111-008 021-080-010 KHAN YAQUB SHARIF KNOX FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST LAWSON FAMILY TRUST 17 HOLLIS LN 221 VERMONT ST 1842 MAGNOLIA GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-092-004 010-102-011 021-080-008 KILE JOHN R&JUANITA KORLING BARBARA M LECHNER HARRY H&PHYLISS M 805 NEVADA ST 180 MAINE ST 1849 SYCAMORE ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-020-007 021-290-027 024-010-056 KIMMICH RUDOLF C ETAL TC KRASOVIC LOUIS J ETAL JT LEE CAMERON M&JUNE D 12125 PITCAIRN LANE 453 BAYBERRY WAY 278 ARCHER AVENUE NEVADA CITY CA 95959 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-055-012 024-260-075 024-020-013 KING FAMILY TRUST KROES JOHN F MD LESTER C P&VICCIE P 0 BOX 342 164 E GRIDLEY 32 ARCHER AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-281-008 010-112-007 024-010-096 KING LOWELL P&RUTH ANN LACEY JEAN M LEWELLEN CARROL D&LILLIAN M 279 OBERMEYER AVE 335 PARK ST 170 ARCHER AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-280-013 024-070-025 010-103-008 KING LOWELL PATRICK JR&MARY ANN LAFEVER DEBORAH J LEWELLEN WILBER E&CORA J 310 BUTTEVIEW DR 1884 AYERS AVE 130 INDIANA ST GRIDLEY CA 959482711 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-121-004 021-300-036 021-110-027 LEWIS DONALD A&NONA M LOOMIS MELVIN W&ROYLE MABERRY RAY W&LETA F 221 OHIO ST 345 BAYBERRY WAY 1444 VERMONT GRIDLEY,CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-070-063 024-010-090 XLBR LEWIS JERI A LOPEZ AURELIO JR AN R 1506 LEWIS OAK ROAD 239 ARCHER AVENUE WAY GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 959489616 A 9 021-080-091 024-010-095 021-330-013 LITTLE EDWIN WALTER&SHARON KAY LOUGHMILLER G R& SHARON MADRIGAL ALVARO M&MARIA G P 0 BOX 1392 162 ARCHER AVENUE 345 SCARLET OAK DR GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-240-076 024-260-031 024-070-009 LITTLE GARY W LOUGHMILLER LARRY&JUDY JT MADRIGAL DELORES G 1215 BLOCK RD 1497 HUMBLE AVE 1889 AYERS AVENUE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-270-036 024-281-003 1-340-016 LOBO PATRICK A&LENORE M LOUTON PENELOPE GAL 20004 PARTHENIA ST 1383 GILSTRAP AVENUE 1457 B OOD ST NORTHRIDGE CA 91324 GRIDLEY CA 95948 DLEY CA 48 009-052-001 010-200-015 022-260-060 LOLMAUGH JACQUELINE E LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE MAGANA OSCAR&ANTONIA 1040 OREGON ST 1533 HWY 99 E PO BOX 786 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 BIGGS CA 95917 022-260-039 010-200-014 024-020-022 LONG GERALD ARTHUR&MARILYN R LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE GRIDLEY LO MALONE RICHARD D 1844 SYCAMORE ST 1533 HWY 99 70 ARCHER AVENUE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-100-048 010-200-041 024-260-024 LONG JAMES E&LAQUITA J LOYAL ORDER OF THE MOOSE LODGE MANES KEVIN DEAN 1436 OREGON ST 1533 HWY 99 E 1467 BONNELL AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-100-040 022-260-021 024-260-081 LONG JAMES E&LAQUITA JOY LOYD JOSEPH R&HOLLY-JEAN MANES RICHARD D 1436 OREGON STREET 1729 W BIGGS-GRIDLEY RD 1467 BONNELL AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 XOT010-111-010 022-260-051 D&DORIS ELINOR LUQUER BILLIE MOON&JOSEPH MARCH CONSUELO S 1120 CEDAR ST 1635 W BIGGS GRIDLEY RD _ GRIDLEY CA 9.5.948 GRIDLEY CA.95.948 009-021-014 010-125-007 022-260-037 MARTIN ANNA K MATHEWS OPAL MCKEY FAMILY TRUST 1130 OHIO ST P 0 BOX 1097 291 OBERMEYER AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 CHICO CA 95927 GRIDLEY CA 959489706 021-110-018 021-280-024 022-340-012 MARTIN ROBERT M FAMILY TRUST MATTOS FRANK W SS MCKIBBEN FAMILY TRUST 1464 VERMONT P 0 BOX 771 468 JUSTESON ROAD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-340-022 009-012-022 021-080-092 MARTINEZ ALEJANDRO H&DEMETRIA MAURER JANE F MCMILLAN WILLIAM RUSSELL& SH 262 SPICETREE ST 1175 VERMONT ST 1855 SYCAMORE ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-013-014 021-110-040 021-330-042 MARTINEZ FIDEL R&MARIA R MCBRIDE CHARLES LEWIS&PATRICIA MCMURTRY ELAINE V 1121 OHIO ST 1418 VERMONT STREET 346 LITTLE AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-340-025 022-210-091 021-290-001 MARTINEZ R JORGE MCCLANAHAN ARLEEN FAMILY TRUST MELCHOR JOSE CRUZ&GUILLERMIN 1448 INDIANA STREET P 0 BOX 681 1494 RANDOLPH AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-112-012 021-340-013 010-112-009 MARTINEZ RUBEN C&ROSA J MCCORMICK CECIL J JR&REBECCA D MELTON EDWARD S& SHIRLEY E P 0 BOX 1168 255 YEW ST 1343 RICHINS AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-290-025 021-080-096 021-340-020 MARTINEZ SAMUEL H&STEPHANIE A MCCRACKEN WINFORD J&DIANE L RE MENDEZ JOSE L&ELSA 0 18 HOLLIS LANE 1835 SYCAMORE ST 250 SPICETREE ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 959482707 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-210-036 010-102-010 024-260-064 MASSAE C E TRUSTEE FOR SIERRA NA MCCULLOUGH BARBARA F MEYER E KURT&PATTI A 507 SUNSET DR 170 MAINE ST 146 BLUE BIRD LANE PARADISE CA 95969 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-080-093 010-200-050 021-100-022 MATHESON HERBERT DENNIS&DIANE MCDONALDS OF HAWAII DEVELOPME MEYER RICKY J&HELEN M 1850 MAGNOLIA ST P 0 BOX 2586 234 LITTLE AVENUE GRIDLEY CA 95948 PARADISE CA 95967 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-210-015 021-080-098 024-090-068 MATHEWS FAMILY TRUST MCDOWELL JACK W&DOREEN L MICHELET RAYMOND JR&CHRISTIN P 0 BOX 932 1870 MAGNOLIA ST 107 NEILSON GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-330-011 024-260-052 010-102-012 MILHAM JAMES M&BETTY MOODY GEORGE L&ROXIE D MOTA PEDRO 419 MACEDO ROAD 655 CAMPBELL AVE P 0 BOX 1373 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-132-009 021-100-024 024-290-010 MILLER ORA A TRUST MOODY MYRLE L SS MOTA SIXTO J&MELVA M 1750 HAZEL ST 244 LITTLE AVE 73 HOLLIS LN GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 X2-240-159 0-092-015 021-310-016 MO ES ANTHO &LISA D MOYLE LYNN A&BEVERLY R 120 NEV T2005 JAY DRIVE 948 LEY CA 95 8 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-280-012 010-103-014 010-011-001 MILLS ELROY G MORAN JORGE MRAKUZIC DAMIAN J,ETAL 300 BUTTE VIEW DR 1293 LAUREL ST 1775 SYCAMORE ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-070-035 021-080-063 009-095-001 MINAIDIS RENA MORELAND CHARLES EUGENE& SHIR MUNSON DANIEL J&CAROL LYNN 99 SAN MATEO RD 1885 MAGNOLIA ST P 0 BOX 1285 HALF MOON BAY CA 94019 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 959481285 024-270-030 021-300-015 009-054-006 MONSON LESTER R&VIVA DELL JT MORENO ARTURO P&MAGDAL3NA T JT MUNSON DANIEL JAMES&CAROL L 51 SHELDON AVE 336 BAYBERRY WAY P 0 BOX 1285 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 959481285 009-022-008 009-011-002 024-010-061 MONTERO HERIBERTO C&ANNA MAR MORFIN CELIA M MURRAH WILLIAM D&JEANETTE 1160 KENTUCKY ST 1143 INDIANA ST 187 TURNER AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-310-012 009-095-006 021-100-044 MONTEZ ELVIRA L LIVING TRUST MORFIN RODOLFO A&TRICIA R MYERS ROMA L ,PPT 403 LITTLE AVE 1790 SPRUCE ST 220 LITTLE AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-090-051 024-260-014 022-330-003 MONTGOMERY ROBERT J&VIRGINIA M MORRIS FAMILY TRUST NAKATA ANNA S 185 NIELSEN AVE 1586 BONNELL AVENUE P 0 BOX 34 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-080-090 022-340-011 024-090-067 MOODEY JEFF&ANITA JT MORRIS RICHARD J&MARILYN J(CB D NANCE MICHAEL V&GISELA 1865 SYCAMORE STREET 462 JUSTESON AVE 91 NIELSON AVENUE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-340-030 010-103-009 024-260-050 NAVARRO AMADOR G&MARIA T NUCHOLS CHARLES H&ALICE OSBORN DAVID L 254 LITTLE AVENUE 140 INDIANA ST 1510 BONNELL AVENUE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-280-015 010-122-006 009-092-003 NEAL GARY KEITH&KAREN MICHELLE OAS THERESE R OSBOURN LINDA JO 330 BUTTE VIEW DR 210 OHIO ST 867 NEVADA ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-290-001 010-103-003 024-260-010 NEISWANGER JOHN K&BEVERLY J OCONNOR ADA B OWEN NINA M TRUST 9 HOLLIS LN 155 PARK ST 1141 CALIFORNIA ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-054-041 021-110-034 021-100-038 NELSON RONALD M&CAROLYN OLSON J CAMERON&JENNIFER W CP OWEN WALTER L 1295 GILSTRAP AVE 1406 VERMONT ST P 0 BOX 1197 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-051-004 024-070-010 021-270-013 NETTLETON EDWARD D ONYETT GEORGE C&ANNE M PACIFIC GAS&ELECTRIC CO 1001 OREGON ST 95 HOLLIS LN P 0 BOX 770000 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 959489305 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94177 024-070-001 024-290-013 021-170-054 NEW WEST PETROLEUM LP ONYETT GEORGE C&ANNE MARIE PAMMA GURNAM S& SURINDER K 1831 16TH ST 95 HOLLIS LANE 9850 SHELDON AVE SACRAMENTO CA 95814 GRIDLEY CA 95948 LIVE OAK CA 95953 022-240-122 024-290-009 024-270-032 NG KAM SANG&KWAN YAU SIU ONYETT RICHARD C&AVIS A(CB DVA) PAMMA GURVINDER 2060 QUAIL CT 1900 FEATHER RIVER BLVD 3310 PENNINGTON RD YUBA CITY CA 95993 MARYSVILLE CA 95901 LIVE OAK CA 95953 021-170-039 009-210-027 021-310-005 NIELSON MARK ALAN&CYNTHIA LEE ORME EDITH B PAMMA PAUL S&PARMINDER K JT 140 HURLBURT LANE 1301 OREGON ST 2021 JAY DRIVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-260-007 024-270-016 021-280-018 NORTH STATE LEASING ORTEGA ANTHONY SS PANECALDO L A&MARY ELLEN 489 COUNTRY DRIVE 4518 INDUSTRIAL AVE P 0 BOX 217 CHICO CA 95928 SIMI VALLEY CA 93063 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-270-045 009-021-006 024-030-006 NORTON WILLIAM JAMES&DEBORAH ORTIZ J GUADALUPE&LUCRECIA PANTALEONI CHRISTINE M TR FBO S 103 SHELDON AVE 1141 KENTUCKY ST 1580 GILSTRAP AVENUE GRIDLEY CA 915.948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-110-005 009-055-015 021-300-039 PANTALEONI DARIN V PAYNE EDSEL LEO& SALLIE K PHAGURA SURINDER K 1019 CENTER AVE 1590 PEACH ST 329 BAYBERRY WAY GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-080-077 022-340-020 021-310-013 PANTALEONI DINO&CHRISTINE PENDERGRAFT DAVID&ERNETTE A PHELPS TRUST 1885 SYCAMORE ST 2124 1ST ST 2014 JAY DR GRIDLEY CA 95948 LINCOLN CA 956482817 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-054-034 024-070-028 022-340-001 PANTALEONI RAYMOND J PEREZ ALBERTO&ELENA HERNANDEZ PIAZZA JASON&KIRSTEN E STORNE 254 OBEMEYER AVENUE 56 OBERMEYER AVE 1757 WEST BIGGS GRIDLEY RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-054-033 021-340-012 009-092-001 PANTALEONI RAYMOND J&PATRICIA PEREZ BERNARDINO&MODESTA PICKERILL ROBERT 0&BARBARA A 254 OBERMEYER AVENUE 1456 INDIANA ST 890 IDAHO ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-093-008 010-092-013 009-093-005 PAREDES ANTONIO M SR&CRISTINA D PEREZ CECILIA ROMAN PIERCE FAMILY TRUST 110 OREGON ST 103 OREGON ST 1626 GRACE RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-100-029 ' 009-022-002 024-020-008 PASSMORE FAMILY TRUST PEREZ JOSE C&ROSA PIKE GARY W 316 LITTLE AVE 17012 GOYA ST 8409 JUGLANS ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRANADA HILLS CA 91344 ORANGEVALE CA 95662 024-281-011 010-112-002 009-054-001 PATTON CURTIS&LINDA PERRIN CARL T TRUST PIPPITT MARJORIE LIVING TRUST 253 OBERMEYER AVENUE 890 38TH AVE#54 987 OREGON ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 SANTA CRUZ CA 95062 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-080-068 4-282-001 021-330-044 PAULSON ANTON R&PEGGY L PERK EATRICE R OS TRUST PLASENCIA MARIA 1875 SYCAMORE 1445 VE T ST 336 LITTLE AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 LEY CA 959 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-010-087 009-013-002 009-210-009 PAWEK WILLIAM T&KARIE A,ETAL PETERSEN LESLIE C POLLOCK ARLA J 292 E GRIDLEY ROAD 1195 OHIO ST 1221 BRIDGEFORD ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-340-024 009-094-006 009-012-003 PAYNE BENJAMIN&HEATHER I PFISTER JOANNE POTOSKI STANLEY&LINDA 422 JUSTESON ROAD 1485 E GRIDLEY RD P 0 BOX 158 GRIDLEY CA.95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-330-004 010-120-015 022-260-007 PRATT PAUL H ETAL RADLEY LEWIS J&CHRISTEL M RECLAMATION DISTRICT 833 473 MACEDO 925 CEDAR ST 00000 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-100-021 010-112-011 009-055-013 PRICE NEAL W&VERDA S JT RAGAN ROBERT W&PAMELA K REEVES ROBERT W&FLORENCE 65617 RIDGEWAY LANE 1140 LOCUST ST 980 OREGON ST ELGIN OR 97827 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-103-011 024-290-003 021-080-032 PRIDDY WILLIAM&PAULINE RAMIIREZ FIDENCIO&IRENE JT REYES PORFIRIO&MARIA G JT 150 INDIANA ST 23 HOLLIS LN 1845 MAGNOLIA STREET GRIDLEY CA 959482912 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-210-022 024-010-079 024-270-031 PROCK BILLY L&DOROTHY A RAMIREZ M&VIDAL REYES PROFIRIO&MARIA G,ETAL 1370 BRIDGEFORD AVE 1403 GILSTRAP AVE 1204 HWY 99 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-210-036 021-340-021 021-330-027 PROTINE MARK B& SHARON J RAMOS BONAFACIO REYNA MIGUEL D&AURORA S ETAL 1120 VAN DEMARK CT 256 SPICETREE ST 330 PARODOX DR GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-300-014 021-340-003 021-250-005 PUGA ELEAZAR&ANITA REV LIVING RAMOS HEUDORO REYNOLDS GARY E&DOLORES P 0 BOX 648 1462 OGDEN AVE 1369 LOSSER AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-330-028 021-340-029 021-330-011 PUGA ENRIQUE C&MARTHA M JT RANA SAEED IQBAL&NASREEN A KH RIAR GURMAIL S& SATINDER K 329 PARADOX DR 248 LITTLE AVE 335 SCARLET OAK DR GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 959483202 021-290-028 010-011-011 0244A9-6891- QUINTERO JOSE ROSALES&CONSUEL RASMUSSEN ELIZABETH A ESTATE OF D 59 447 BAYBERRY WAY 1666 BALD ROCK RD 06 ;�SON ALE DR GRIDLEY CA 95948 BERRY CREEK CA 95916 US HEIGHTS CA 022-330-008 024-051-019 009-092-002 QUIST GALE STEVEN&JEANETTE F RATLIFF DOREEN RICHINS ALVIN D&DOROTHY RAE 445 MACEDO RD 247 OBERMEYER AVENUE 1044 AD LANE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 959482704 024-010-107 010-092-002 021-100-046 QUIST GLORIA R SS RECLAMATION DIST 833 RICHINS JANETTE C SS 1458 GILSTRAP AVE 00000 1145 LOCUST STREET GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-101-013 010-101-008 021-340-031 RILEY RAYMOND E&GUSSIE E ROMERO DION D SANDOVAL BENJAMIN C&FRANCISCA 187 MAINE ST 110 CALIFORNIA ST 258 LITTLE AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-010-091 021-330-031 021-280-017 RIVERA FRANK&EDITH TRUST CB DVA ROMO ARTURO R&ROSE M SANFORD THOMAS G&KAREN K 207 ARCHER AVE 345 PARADOX DR 410 BUTTE VIEW DR GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-054-003 021-270-009 024-054-039 RIVERA GONZALO&MARGARITA GAR ROOKS VICTOR D&MARY L SANNAR DENNIS B& SHARON 961 OREGON ST 12950 LOS OSOS STREET 516 LITTLE AVENUE GRIDLEY CA 95948 REDDING CA 96003 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-010-088 021-330-010 021-070-099 ROBERTS CHARLES R&RUTH M CP ROSALES RUFINO A&VERONICA JT SANNAR DENNIS B& SHARON S CP 1575 GILSTRAP 329 SCARLET OAK DR 516 LITTLE AVENUE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-330-002 009-132-008 021-250-033 ROBERTSON ROBERT J&NE DEAN JT RUGGIERO FREDERICK C&JANIS K SANNAR RICHARD F 487 MACEDO ROAD 640 IDAHO ST 1393 RICHINS AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-330-013 010-122-015 021-070-100 ROBERTSON RUSSELL RUIZ SALVADOR&BELIA SANNAR RICHARD F&JUANITA L CP 1837 W BIGGS GRIDLEY RD 277 NEVADA ST 556 LITTLE AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-260-028 010-093-003 009-210-014 ROBINSON RICKE RUNNALLS ANNIE G(DECD)FAMILY R SANTA FAMILY TRUST P 0 BOX 1620 2132 LARKIN RD 1240 BRIDGEFORD AVE OROVILLE CA 95965 BIGGS CA 95917 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-070-013 021-340-004 021-340-009 ROCHA JOSEPH LEONARD&DOROTHY SALGADO JOSE&MARIANA R SANTANA FELIX E&CECILIA 1865 AYERS AVE 1425 INDIANA STREET 277 YEW ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-330-007 021-340-017 009-021-016 RODRIGUEZ JESUS&IRMA C SANCHEZ HECTOR SANTANA JESSE 340 SCARLET OAK DR 1447 BOWWOOD STREET 1155 OHIO ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-330-043 010-092-012 009-013-012 RODRIGUEZ JOSE A&MARIA R SANCHEZ IRINEO JOSE&MARIA GREIS SANTANA JOSE G&MARIA C 340 LITTLE AVE 171 OREGON ST 1155 OHIO ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-070-018 024-070-029 021-280-038 SANTILLAN ALFREDO&CAROLINA SCHWARTZ CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL& SHIFFLET CLIFTON TESTAMENTARY 857 COLUSA HWY 92 OBERMEYER AVE 232 E GRIDLEY RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-330-006 009-093-004 00Q 094-�03-- SATTERWHITE CHARLES R JR SCHWARTZ LEO&MARY CHEL TRAC 346 SCARLET OAK DR 1690 OAK ST 747 I ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 DLEY CA 9 021-100-039 021-100-016 021-170-052 SCHEYER RONALD K&PATRICIA LOU SCROGIN DAVID W&CYNTHIA L SIDHER CHANDER&GYAN 1426 OREGON ST 1459 VERMONT ST 3196 LA MANTIA DR GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 YUBA CITY CA 95993 009-210-020 021-100-023 024-054-005 SCHMIDL ROBERT L& SANDRA S SECRETARY OF HOUSING&URBAN DE SILVA EDWARD A&LILA A 1350 BRIDGEFORD CT 450 GOLDEN GATE AVE 21780 WILCOX RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 SAN FRANCISCO CA 941023448 RED BLUFF CA 96080 024-260-084 022-260-025 021-340-001 SCHOHR DOUGLAS B&ALMA JEAN SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SILVA-CASTENEDA JOSE LUIS BOX 785 1301 CLAY ST 1300 NORTH 1405 INDIANA ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 OAKLAND CA 946125209 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-260-025 010-103-005 021-290-026 SCHOHR FAMILY TRUST SEELEY UNA C SINGH BHAJA&KARNAIL KAUR BOX 785 777 OHIO ST 459 BAYBERRY WAY GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-280-019 010-200-047 021-340-019 SCHOHR FRED&KATHRYN SENIOR HOUSING ASSOCIATES SINGH SATNAM&HARWINDER KAUR 1083 CORNER OF GAIL ALMOND P 0 BOX 38 1427 BOWWOOD ST ARBUCKLE CA 95912 DAVIS CA 95617 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-070-088 009-013-003 024-270-014 SCHOHR PAUL&CHRISTINE S14ACKLEFORD DENNIS J&DEBRA F SINGH SUKHM[INDER P 0 BOX 445 1185 OHIO ST 1220 HWY 99E GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-260-083 024-020-023 024-051-025 SCHOHR WILLIAM B &LISA A SHACKLEFORD NEAL A&PATRICIA SU SKAGGS DANNY E&JOYCE L JT 1474 BONNELL AVE 84 ARCHER AVE 115 OBERMEYER AVENUE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-270-033 022-330-012 024-055-008 SCHWANS SALES ENTERPRISES INC SHARROCK ELBERT LEE&ARLENE K* SKOURIS IOULIA 115 WEST COLLEGE DR 411 MACEDO RD 241 OBRIEN AVE MARSHALL MN 56258 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 i 024-090-007 021-270-028 010-210-039 SKOURIS IOULIA* SMITH RANDY&VALERIE CP SOUTHLAND CORPORATION THE 241 OBRIEN AVE 250 WILLEY WAY P O BOX 711 GRIDLEY CA 95948 BIGGS CA 95917 DALLAS TX 75221 024-281-017 022-230-005 024-290-021 SLAGLE GERALD D&DOLORES R FAMI SMITH THOMAS C&PATRICIA SPARROW VIRGIL LEON&CATHERIN 1389 GILSTRAP AVE 1650 PECAN ST 46 HOLLIS LN GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-051-024 022-230-002 024-270-028 SLIGAR GEORGE B JR&HILKE R SMITH THOMAS C&PATRICIA JT SPENCE RONALD K&JOYCE A P O BOX 116 1650 PECAN ST 48 SHELDON AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-210-018 024-020-018 - SLOTA JOHN W&CATHERINE A TRUST. SMITH THOMAS C IV ENCER REVOCABLE L �3T 1330 BRIDGEFORD CT 24 ARCHER AVE 1880 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 LEY CA 9 024-270-034 024-051-017 024-290-014 SMITH COREY N&LISA L SOARES ANTHONY L&MARTHA E SPRAGUE CHARLENE S 40 SHELDON AVE 227 OBERMEYER AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-070-014 021-280-028 009-093-002 SMITH EDSON A&VICKI M SOARES DANIEL LEE&DONNA L SQUIRE MAEZELL M LIVING TRUST 1859 AYERS AVE 407 RANDOLPH AVE 1601 PEACH ST GRIDLEY CA 959489705 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-060-004 022-260-036 009-095-007 SMITH HAROLD DEE JR SOARES JASON& CYNTHIA SQUIRE PEARL M 1374 HWY 99 E 1743 WEST BIGGS GRIDLEY RD 742 IDAHO GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-260-065 022-260-045 025-200-095 SMITH HAROLD EUGENE&HILDA JEA SORENSON FAMILY TRUST STATE OF CALIFORNIA 411 JUSTESON RD P O BOX 954 00000 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 SACRAMENTO CA 95814 009-012-009 024-110-066 024-260-030 SMITH JOEL D&BETTY L FAMILY TRU SORIA NICASIO STATE OF CALIFORNIA(CALTRANS) 1137 VERMONT ST 171 WRIGHT AVE P O BOX 911 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 MARYSVILLE CA 95901 024-260-079 009-020-001 024-270-019 SMITH PHILLIP,ETAL SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD STEINBECK BONNIE J 1470 HWY 99 E 00000 54 SHELDON AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-260-006 021-110-039 010-112-005 STENZEL FRANK M STUKE NURSERY CO TATE CATHERINE LORAIN 1683 W BIGGS GRIDLEY RD P 0 BOX 1200 1115 CEDAR ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-054-052 024-054-022 021-340-034 STEWART ARNOLD&DIANNA G JT STUKE WILLIAM E REVOCABLE.TRUST TAYLOR THOMAS J&BETTY B 144 OBERMEYER AVE P 0 BOX 1200 262 LITTLE AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 959481200 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-093-013 021-310-017 022-340-013 STOHLMAN WILLIAM L&KRISTINE E SULLIVAN FAMILY TRUST TEAGUE GAIL E&PATSY L JT 140 OREGON ST P 0 BOX 848 P 0 BOX 338 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-240-139 024-290-022 021-330-025 STOPPLEMORE GAYLORD E&MARLYN SUTTON EARLE D REVOCABLE TRUST TEJEDA CARLOS&MAGDALENA 464 MACEDO ROAD 38 HOLLIS LN 340 PARADOX DR GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-190-005 009-210-030 009-013-013 STOWE BARBARA JEAN EXEMP EQ TRU SWANSON WALTER D&JUDY N TERRY DON L&ELOISE M 406 E EVANS REIMER RD 1380 BRIDGEFORD AVE 1135 OHIO ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-190-025 024-030-010 024-020-012 STOWE BARBARA JEAN MARITAL TRU SWISHER ROBERT L&AUDREY TERRY FAMILY TRUST 406 E EVANS REIMER RD 1586 GILSTRAP AVENUE 817 BROADWAY GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 VALLEJO CA 94590 024-110-162 024-070-038 009-101-009 STRAW RANCH SYREN WESLEY K TESCHER LOUIS W&LAVETA G 580 SHELDON AVE 5905-D CLARK RD STE 116 848 OREGON ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 PARADISE CA 95969 GRIDLEY CA 95948 022-240-019 009-012-021 009-131-008 STREIGHTIFF OUIDA ESTATE OF TAMAGNI ERNEST C&ETHELYN I THAYER DONALD R&MARJORIE I 505 MACEDO RD 1155 VERMONT ST 1800 HAZEL ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-281-014 024-010-080 021-240-022 STUART JAY L& SUZANNE TAMBOURINE ANGELO THOMAS&LO THIARA GURDIAL S& SUKHWANT K 273 OBERMEYER AVE 1413 GILSTRAP AVE 1537 ATKINSON CT GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 YUBA CITY CA 95991 024-070-019 024-070-015 021-070-101 STUART JAY L&SUZANNE K TAPPER FAMILY TRUST THOMAS JERRY W&DEANNA L JT 273 OBERMEYER AVENUE 1853 AYERS AVE 544 LITTLE AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-190-027 024-282-002 010-101-004 THOMAS ROBERT G REVOCABLE TRUST TORRES TIMOTEO&JOSEPHINA VALVERDE RAMON PO BOX 91 1370 GILSTRAP AVE P O BOX 164 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 BIGGS CA 95917 021-250-021 021-110-020 024-260-085 THOMAS ROBERT W&JUANITA L JT TRI VALLEY GROWERS VANDEHEY ROGER&LISA P O BOX 493 2260 TENAYA DR 152 E GRIDLEY RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 MODESTO CA 95354 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-125-003 024-281-016 MATO SN F TRI VALLEY GROWERS INC VANDRE PAMELA B 1854 A AVE 2260 TENAYA DRIVE 267 OBERMEYER AVE ;�DLEY CA 95 MODESTO CA 95354 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-060-014 021-080-011 024-070-012 THOMPSON RALPH E TUPEN JAMES E&MARY J VANFOSSAN GERALD H&HELEN M 1144 PONDEROSA COURT 1625 KOFFORD RD 1871 AYERS AVENUE YUBA CITY CA 95991 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-070-017 022-270-029 009-210-035 THORPE FRED E JR&EVA M TUPEN JAMES E&MARY J JT VAUGHAN JAMES S&FRANCES M 1841 AYERS AVE 1625 KOFFORD ROAD 1140 VAN DE MARK CT GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-020-014 010-120-016 024-290-020 TINGLEY RICHARD L TURNBULL HARVEY T&PEGGY A VAWTER CECIL RAY&DOROTHY NE 42 ARCHER AVE 190 VERMONT ST 52 HOLLIS LANE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-110-033 010-200-052 021-290-022 TOKUNO FAMILY TRUST TWOBONED ASSOCIATES VENEGAS JESUS M&MARGARITA OL PO BOX 433 P O BOX 7 452 BAYBERRY WAY i GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 I 021-300-037 024-060-011 010-102-008 TOOR HARDEEP UDOVICH FAMILY LIVING TRUST VENTIONER TIMOTHY A 3013 SEAN DR 3216 WEST ORO-DAM BLVD 1320 LOCUST ST LIVE OAK CA 95953 OROVILLE CA 95965 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-102-003 009-132-001 021-340-005 TOPETE JAVIER D,ETAL UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH OF GR VERA JESUS H&RAQUEL G 173 INDIANA ST P O BOX 1039 1431 INDIANA STREET GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-070-026 024-070-037 021-340-011 TORRES JUAN P&FELICITAS M VALENZUELA FRANK J&BERNADETT VIEIRA DIANE M 1890 AYERS AVE 42 OBERMEYER AVE 267 YEW STREET GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-290-018 024-260-004 021-310-009 VILLANUEVA TERESA WALTON ARVIL H&BETTY JT WATTS DONALD E 66 HOLLIS LN .1457 BONNELL AVE 2030 JAY DR GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 959482716 010-011-009 024-030-022 009-210-028 VILLEGAS JESUS &MARIA WALTON JOY L SS WEBB MARJORIE VAN DE MARK LM P O BOX 712 P 0 BOX 641 1400 BRIDGEFORD AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-340-008 024-010-112 009-210-038 VILLEGAS UBALDO WARD RON&JEANNE WEBB MARJORIE VAN DEMARK LM 281 YEW ST 1480 HUMBLE AVE 1400 BRIDGEFORD AVE GRIDLEY CA 959489414 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-281-004 024-030-011 009-210-031 VINES HARRY JAMES&PATRICIA A WARNER JOHN M& CLAUDIA WERNER BRIAN D&RHONDA M 1377 GILSTRAP AVE 310 E GRIDLEY RD 1371 BRIDGEFORD AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-310-006 21-310-004 022-260-023 VINES JAMES S&ANNA MARIE JT WA RBURY GE LHTNE SS WESCOTT REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS 2025 JAY DRIVE 2017 J 437 JUSTESON RD GRIDLEY CA 95948 DLEY CA 95 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-102-014 024-270-005 024-260-055 WADSWORTH GARY L&CONNIE R WATERBURY STANLEY K&KATHLEE WESTERN INVESTMENT REAL ESTAT 140 MAINE ST P 0 BOX 1104 P 0 BOX 2695 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 ROSEVILLE CA 95746 010-210-009 024-054-007 009-054-008 WAGGENER JOSEPHINE H WATERBURY STANLEY KEITH&KATE WHALE PHYLLIS ELEANOR 806 MACY AVE P 0 BOX 1104 955 OREGON ST CHICO CA 95926 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-051-005 024-054-008 021-310-008 WALKER EUGENE&EUNICE E WATERBURY STANLEY KEITH&KATE WHEELER KATHLEEN MARY 2421 MELTON CIRCLE PO BOX 1104 2101 JAY DR LIVE OAK CA 95953 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-101-005 009-021-005 021-240-025 WALKER TAMiVIIE WATSON RICHARD F&DELAINA WHEELER ORCHARD INC 145 MAIN ST 155 ARCHER AVE 532 SHELDON AVENUE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-012-014 024-260-077 009-210-016 WALLIS WILMA B WATSON RICHARD F&DELAINE L JT WILES THOMAS LEE&NANCY J 1166 INDIANA ST 155 ARCHER AVE 1310 BRIDGEFORD CT GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 4 Y Y 021-070-072 010-092-007 009-011-008 WILKERSON CATHY LYNN* WINTERS ANNA L ZITO GLORIA ANGELES 1565 PALM LN 162 NEVADA ST 11015 MEYERS LN GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 LIVE OAK CA 95953 010-200-019 024-270-021 009-101-007 WILLEY ROSS T WISNER HENRY E&LINDA C ZUNINO SHARON E P O BOX 818 PO BOX 54 810 OREGON ST CODY WY 82414 SODA SPRINGS CA 95728 GRIDLEY CA 95948 010-111-009 022-240-158 WILLIAMS CLARENCE&RHONDA WOLF FAMILY TRUST 3184 HAWKINS LN 514 MACEDO RD BIGGS CA 95917 GRIDLEY CA 95948 009-101-002 010-125-004 WILLIAMS SCOTTY&VIRGINIA WOLFE GEORGE A&GERI 1 891 CALIFORNIA ST 101 VIRGINIA ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-070-016 009-021-007 WILSON ARNOLD D WOMACK FLOYD E&IOLA H P 0 BOX 563 1369 MAGNOLIA ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-270-033 021-170-010 WILSON BELVA JEAN WRIGHT DON&VALERIE 32 SHELDON AVE 1157 HWY 99 GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 024-030-033 010-101-009 WILSON FAMILY TRUST WRIGHT MARTHA M 1564 GILSTRAP AVE 120 CALIFORNIA ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-280-030 024-270-046 WILSON HERBERT J&VIOLET J YOST STANLEY M&RHONDA J P O BOX 559 109 SHELDON AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-110-031 024-260-047 WILSON RICHARD L&JOANIE JT YOUNG STANLEY P 0 BOX 663 175 E SPRUCE ST BIGGS CA 95917 GRIDLEY CA 95948 021-280-016 009-012-016 WINFREY GARY L&PATRICIA C ZITO BERNICE E 400 BUTTEVIEW DRIVE 1182 INDIANA ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 GRIDLEY CA 95948 i Killips William Burleson Edwin Becker 12 Mapleglen Court 547 Indiana Street 1490 State Highway 99, Ste. A Danville, CA 94506-2034 Gridley, CA 95948-2415 Gridley, Ca 95948-9783 Rachel Bessee Michael Erickson Jerome Anderson P.O. Box 1282 908 Township Road 5702 Glenway Street Gridley, CA 95948-1382 Gridley, CA 95948-9538 Mc Farland, WI 53558-9006 Peter Blake Lamont Feske Boeger Survivors Trust 931 Lucerne Avenue 2205 Cheim Blvd., Apt. 7 2041 Delgado Way Gustine, CA 95322-1025 Marysville, CA 95901-3558 Sacramento, CA 95833-1414 John Casaulong Rosann Gates Mark Brown P.O. Box 272 12 Saint Paul Circle 409 E 3rd Street Gridley, CA 95948-0272 Novato, CA 94947-2913 Stevensville, MT 59870-2120 Alfonso Gonzalez Irene Foltz William Armstrong 293 Bennington Street 1885 Pacific Avenue, Apt. 301 2006 Bridges Drive, Apt. A ' East Boston, MA 02128-1423 San Franciso, CA 94019-2327 Tampa, FL 33621-1415 Guillermo Campos Philip Demeyer Hal Gardner 1016 Dewsnup Avenue P.O. Box 952 370 E Washington Avenue Gridley, CA 95948-9532 Gridley, CA 95948-0952 Chico, CA 95926-3938 Edwin Dunham Beatrice Perry Bob Mills P.O. Box 564 1948 U Street 4219 Aschli Lane Meadow Vista, CA 95722-0564 Rio Linda, CA 95673-1714 Idaho Falls, ID 83406-4624 Maria Madrigal Wayne Long Anthony Morales P.O. Box 709 2750 Sierra Sunrise Ter#22 1594 Glenn Ellen Drive Gridley, CA 95948-0709 Chico, cA 95928-3934 Gridley, CA 95948-9405 Geraldine Waterbury 1255 Locust Street Gridley, CA 95948-2924 SUTTE COUNTY CLERK OF THE BOARD USE ONLY SOARD OF SUPERVIS ... ;S; : : . :. MEETING DATE: AGENDA TRANSMITTAL AGENDA ITEM: s AGENDATITLE: Board of .'Supervisors - Gridley/Biggs - General Plain Amend. & Rezone DEPARTMENT: A DDS,' Planning DATE: 4/19/0'1 MEETING DATE REQUESTED: -5/8/01 ,;,,.: CONTACT: Craig Sanders,_ PHONE: ".7.603 _ REGULAR•.% -CONSENT DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: See"Attached _ w AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL REQUIRES THE ORIGINAL AND NINE (9) COPIES ATTACH EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM AND OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION AS NECESSARY Budgetary Impact: Yes No X CAO OFFICE USE ONLY If yes,complete Budgetary Impact Worksheet on back Budget Transfer Requested: Yes No X Administrative Office Review If yes,complete Budget Transfer Request Worksheet on back. Administrative Office Staff Contact (Deadline is one business day prior to normal agenda deadline) Will Proposal Require an Agreement: Yes No X 4/5's Vote Required: Yes: No: Auditor-Controller's Number(if required): County Counsel's Approval: Yes No- Date Received by Clerk of Board: Will Proposal Require Additional Personnel: Yes No X Number of Permanent: Temp Extra Help Previous Board Action Date: Additional Information Attached:Yes X No Describe: Packets Rev.1198 SPE(-.. .L INSTRUCTIONS TO CLEF _. } Number of originals required to"be„returned to Department: ”*Please Note"* Department is responsible for returning contract to contractor. Clerk of the Board returns' completed Auditor's copy ONLY. Requested Board Action: Ordinance Required Resolution Required Minute Order Required For Inforrnation Only r BUDGETARY IMPACT WORKSHEET Current Year Estimated Cost/Funding Source Source of Additional Funds Requested Estimated Cost $ Contingencies $ (Fund Name: 1 (Fund Number. 1 Amount Budgeted $ Unanticipated Revenue $ (budget unit Number: ) (Source: 1 (Fund Name: 1 (Rev.Code: 1 (Fund Number: 1 Other Transfer(s) $ 1. Complete worksheet below 2. Deadline is one business dayrp for to normal agenda deadline Additional Requested $ Total Source of Funds $ Annualized cost$ if also planned for next year. Budget Transfer Authorized By Administrative Office Board Action Required for B-Transfer? Yes No Authorized Signature Date BUDGET TRANSFER REQUEST WORKSHEET Transfer Request: AMOUNT LINE ITEM LINE ITEM Transfer S (No Cents)From To Transfer S (No Cents)From To Transfer S (No Cents)From To Transfer S (No Cents)From To ❑ The area added to the Gridley Sphere of Influence by LAFCo Resolution 28 1999/00 shall remain in an Orchard and Field Crop land use designation with an A-40 zone to preserve continued agricultural uses until the land is annexed to the City of Gridley. See Figure LU-4 (Gridley Urban Reserve) SUMMARY: Butte County Board of Supervisors, (Item on which a notice of intent to adopt a Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding environmental impacts has been given), General Plan and Zoning Amendment.in and around the City of.Gridley to reflect changes made to the Sphere of Influence by LAFCo in April, 2000. The proposed changes are as follows: 1) Change the Land Use designation from Low Density Residential to Agricultural Residential and Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 140 acres located on the east side of Gridley between East Gridley Road and Sheldon Avenue; 2) Change the Land Use designation from Medium Density Residential to Agricultural Residential and Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 9.2 acres identified as APN 024- 270-032; 3) Change the Land Use designation from Low Density Residential to Agricultural Residential on approximately 35 acres identified as APN 021-070-087 (ptn.) and APN 021-070-050; 4) Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 30 acres located immediately northwest of the Gridley Sphere of Influence; 5) Rezone from SR to SR-5 approximately 28 acres identified as APN 022-230-001 and 022- 260-006; 6) Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 34 acres located within Gridley's Sphere of Influence on the south side of Yew Street and the east side of Oregon Street; 7) . Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 51 acres.located within the Sphere of Influence, immediately adjacent to the city limits, on the southeast side of the city. Also amending the Gridley Urban Reserve diagram and policies in.the Land Use Element of the Butte County General Plan to reflect the City's new Sphere of Influence. (CBS) (GPA 01-02) ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION A. Adopt a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts,with the following findings: 1. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act,that said study did not identify significant environmental effects, and that a Negative Declaration.is proposed. 2. Find that the Board of Supervisors has considered the proposed Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. 3. Find, on the basis of the whole record before the Board of Supervisors,including the Initial Study and any comments received,that there is no substantial evidence that the Rezone and General Plan Amendment for Butte County Board of Supervisors, Planning Division File No. GPA/RZ 01-02 will have a significant effect on the environment. 4. Find that the proposed Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. 5. Adopt the Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts. B. Adopt a"de minimus"exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The project site is not known to contain any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3)and 14 CCR 753.5. is not required. C. Adopt a resolution amending the Butte County General Plan as follows with the included findings: Land Use Man 1. Change the land use designations on the Gridley/Biggs Land Use Map from Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential to Agricultural Residential for the lands located on the south and east side of Gridley, outside the SOI, shown as areas (Band OO in Attachment "F" of the March 8, 2001, Planning Commission Report. The proposed change is supported by the following findings: a. Based on the analysis in the City of Gridey's General Plan, the subject land will not be needed for urban development in the next 20 years. b. The subject land meets the Agricultural Residential site designation criteria in the Butte County Land Use Element on page LUE 51. C. The Agricultural Residential designation.will act as a buffer between urban uses and intensive agricultural use consistent with Policy 2.1.f. of the Land Use Element. Urban Reserve Policy and Map 2. Amend the Gridley Urban Reserve policy as provided in Attachment"I" of the March 8, 2001 Planning Commission Report. 3. Amend Figure LU-4 of the Land Use Element showing the Gridley Urban Reserve area to reflect the amendments made to the SOI adopted by LAFCo on April 6,2000, as shown in Attachment "H" of the March 8, 2001, Planning Commission Report. These amendments are supported by the following findings: a. The new Urban Reserve Boundary, including the 300-foot buffer along the interface of the new SOI boundary on the north side of Gridley,is consistent with the Butte County General Plan because it implements the following General Plan policies and programs: LUE 1.2.a. Plan for future development of all incorporated and unincorporated areas with county boundaries. LUE 1.2.b. Consult with incorporated cities and neighboring counties in the development of planning proposals for areas of mutual concern. LUE 1.7.a. Encourage annexation to existing cities and existing districts. LUE 1.7.b. Promote the full utilization of sites served by existing public facilities. LUE 1.7.c. Encourage development in and around existing communities with public facilities. LUE 2.Lf. Allow rural residential development as a buffer' between urban development and intensive crop land. AE 1.6 Work with LAFCo to create and maintain a consistent approach to the conservation of agricultural land through the designation of reasonable and logical Sphere of Influence boundaries. Support future annexations and Sphere of Influence amendments only when in compliance with the Agricultural Element and LAFCo policies and procedures. It is not the intent of this Element to preclude cities from expansion. AE 1.8 A planning area for the cities of Gridley and Biggs, which is beyond the existing Spheres of Influence should be defined by each city to reflect each city's area of interest. General plan amendments, Spheres of Influence modifications,and finally,annexation of those areas of interest is the legally required process. Upon annexation of the areas of interest, the city general plan and zoning will apply. Until that time, the County General Plan and zoning will apply. The County will participate in a cooperative manner in this process as requested by the cities and as County resources permit. Until annexed,the area will be designated by the County as productive agricultural hand, and also because retention in larger tracts will be most beneficial to the cities if the land is eventually developed. AE 2.2 Encourage urban infill development within city limits and within existing unincorporated communities where development can more easily and readily be served by public infrastructure facilities. AE 2.5 Encourage urban development to the LAFCo adopted Spheres of Influence. Program AE 2.6 Utilize the LAFCo adopted Spheres of Influence for the cities and the identified unincorporated community cores as areas for urban and/or more intensive development. Restr_ct urban and intensive development to those areas outside agriculture and other low-intensity uses. D. Adopt an ordinance rezoning areas in and around the.Gridley's SOI as follows with the included findings: 1. Rezone approximately 228 acres from SR-1 to SR-5, shown as areas a)and®in Attachment "F" of the March 8, 2001, Planning Commission Report. This is supported by the following findings: a. The SR-5 zone is listed as a consistent zoning designation in the Butte County General Plan for the Agricultural Residential land use designation. b. The physical characteristics of the area will support development at a density of 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres. 2. Rezone approximately 49 acres located on the east side of Gridley from SR=1 to SR-5, shown as area ® in Attachment "F" of the March 8, 2001, Planning Commission Report, with the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's Medium Density Residential or the City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed upon this property until municipal services are available for more intense development. 3. Rezone approximately 35 acres from SR-i to SR-5, shown as area O in Attachment "F" of the March 8, 2001, Planning Commission Report, with the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's and City's Low Density Residential land use designations,is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan ,overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed on this property until municipal services are available to allow more intense development. 4. Rezone approximately 30 acres from SR to SR-5, located on the northwest side of the Gridley,shown as area©in Attachment T"of the March.8,2001 Planning Commission Report, with the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's Medium Density Residential or the City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed on this property until municipal services are available to allow more intense development. BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA REPORT - MAY,812001 Applicant: Butte County Board of Supervisors APN: Various File#: GPA/RZ 01-02 Location: In and around the Sphere of Request: General Plan Amendment changing Influence of the City of Gridley land use designations on the Gridley Biggs Area Plan Map, as Parcel Size: Various well as amendments to the Gridley Urban Reserve Map and policies in Zone date: Various the Land Use Element. Associated rezones are recommended to bring Attachments: zoning into conformity with the A. Planning Commission Report, March 8, land use designations 2001/minutes B. Recommended General Plan and zoning G.P.: Low Density Residential, Medium designations Density Residential, Agricultural C. Proposed Ordinance Residential D. Proposed Resolution Zoning: SR, SR-1, A-5, I. BACKGROUND On June 12,2000, the Board of Supervisors initiated a General Plan Amendment and rezone for lands in and around the Gridley's Sphere of Influence (SOI) to reflect changes that LAFCo made to this sphere in April .2000. The amendment involves changes to the Land Use Element including the Urban Reserve policies and rezoning of applicable lands to implement these changes and address related issues. The March 8, 2001, Planning Commission report .covered the issues of the proposed General Plan amendments and zoning changes in detail. This report is included as Attachment "A." The Board also received an extensive report on these issues at their June 12, 2000, meeting. Because the Commission recommends-that the Board accept and take the actions presented in their staff report, without change, a detailed analysis is not presented in this report. II. CEQA ISSUES An initial study was prepared for this project and.no significant impacts were identified. The actions proposed by this project are to bring the zoning and/or General Plan into consistency with the Urban Reserve policy and reduce zoning.densities from a 1-acre minimum or less, to a 5-acre minimum. This . 1 reduction in density will therefore reduce potential impacts when these lands are actually developed. The impacts associated with the change in the SOI were addressed in an Environmental Impact Report prepared and adopted by LAFCo for the SOI amendment. III. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION A. Adopt a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts, with the following findings: 1. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, that said study did not identify significant environmental effects, and that a Negative Declaration is proposed. 2. Find that the Board of Supervisors has considered the proposed Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. 3. Find,on the basis of the whole record before the Board of Supervisors,including the Initial Study and any comments received,that there is no substantial evidence that the Rezone and General Plan Amendment for Butte County Board of Supervisors,Planning Division File No. GPA/RZ 01-02 will have a significant effect on the environment. 4. Find that the proposed Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. 5. Adopt the Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts. B. Adopt a "de minimus" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The project site is not known to contain any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5. is not required. C. Adopt a resolution amending the Butte County General Plan as follows with the included findings: Land Use Man 1. Change the land use designations on the Gridley/Biggs Land Use Map from Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential to Agricultural Residential for the lands located on the south and east side of Gridley,outside the SOI, shown as areas Oand O in Attachment"F"of the March 8,2001,Planning Commission Report. The proposed change is supported by the following findings: a. Based on the analysis in the City of Gridley's General Plan,the subject land will not 2 be needed for urban development in the next 20 years. b. The subject land meets the Agricultural Residential site designation criteria in the Butte County Land Use Element on page LUE 51. C. The Agricultural Residential designation will act as a buffer between urban uses and intensive agricultural use consistent with Policy 2.Lf. of the Land Use Element. Urban Reserve Policy and Map 2. Amend the Gridley Urban Reserve policy as provided in Attachment "I" of the March 8, 2001 Planning Commission Report. 3. Amend Figure LU-4 of the Land Use Element showing the Gridley Urban Reserve area to reflect the amendments made to the SOI adopted by LAFCo on April 6, 2000, as shown in Attachment "H" of the March 8, 2001,Planning Commission Report. These amendments are supported by the following findings: a. The new Urban Reserve Boundary,including the 300-foot buffer along the interface of the new SOI boundary on the north side of Gridley, is consistent with the Butte County General Plan because it implement's the following General Plan policies and programs: LUE 1.2.a. Plan for future development of all incorporated and unincorporated areas with county boundaries. LUE 1.2.b. Consult with incorporated cities and neighboring counties in the development of planning proposals for areas of mutual concern. LUE 1.7.a. Encourage annexation to existing cities and existing districts. LUE 1.7.b. Promote the full utilization of sites served by existing public facilities. LUE 1.7.c. Encourage development in and around existing communities with public facilities. LUE 2.Lf. Allow rural residential development as a buffer between urban development and intensive crop land. AE 1.6 Work with LAFCo to create and maintain a consistent approach to the conservation of agricultural land through the designation of reasonable and logical Sphere of Influence boundaries. Support future annexations and Sphere of Influence amendments only when in compliance with the Agricultural Element and LAFCo policies and procedures. It is not the intent of this Element to preclude cities from expansion. 3 I, AE 1.8 A planning area for the cities of Gridley and Biggs, which is beyond the existing Spheres of Influence should be defined by each city to reflect. each city's area of interest. General plan amendments, Spheres of Influence modifications, and finally, annexation of those areas of interest is the legally required process. Upon annexation of the areas of interest, the city general plan and zoning will apply. Until that time, the County General Plan and zoning will apply. The County will participate in a cooperative manner in this process as requested by the cities and as County resources permit. Until annexed,the!area will be designated by the County as productive agricultural land, and also because retention in larger tracts will be most beneficial to the cities if the land is eventually developed. AE 2.2 Encourage urban infill development within city limits and within existing unincorporated communities where development can more easily and readily be served by public infrastructure facilities. AE 2.5 Encourage urban development to the LAFCo adopted Spheres of Influence. Program AE 2.6 Utilize the LAFCo adopted Spheres of Influence for the cities and the identified unincorporated community cores as areas for urban and/or more intensive development. Restrict urban and intensive development to those areas outside agriculture and other low-intensity uses. D. Adopt an ordinance rezoning areas in and around the Gridley's SOI as follows with the included findings: 1. Rezone approximately 228 acres from SR-1 to SR-5, shown as areas O and O in Attachment"F"of the March 8, 2001,Planning Commission Report. This is supported by the following findings: a. The SR-5 zone is listed as a consistent zoning designation in the Butte County General Plan for the Agricultural Residential land use designation. b. The physical characteristics of the area will support development at a density of 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres. 2. Rezone approximately 49 acres located on the east side of Gridley from SR-1 to SR-5, shown as area®in Attachment "F"of the March 8, 2001, Planning Commission Report, with the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's Medium Density Residential or the City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent 4 with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed upon this property until municipal services are available for more intense development. 3. Rezone approximately 35 acres from SR-1 to SR-5, shown as area O in Attachment "F" of the March 8, 2001, Planning Commission Report, with the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's and City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed on this property until municipal services are available to allow more intense development. 4. Rezone approximately 30 acres from SR to SR-5, located on the northwest side of the Gridley, shown as area©in Attachment "F" of the March 8, 2001 Planning Commission Report, with the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's Medium Density Residential or the City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed on this property until municipal services are available to allow more intense development. 5 Gridley-Biggs Area Land Use Plan Situated on and surrounded by agricultural soil resources which provide no alternative to the planned conversion of agricultural lands to accommodate future urban/rural development, the Gridley-Biggs Area Land Use Plan provides for a relatively large amount of land designated Low, medium, and High Density Residential and Agricultural Residential. These areas are located adjacent to the City of Gridley. Currently devoted to a mixture of agricultural and rural residential uses, these areas are designated for future urban expansion. To preserve these residential density options, for the time frame of the plan (2666) City of Gridley's General Plan (2020), and to coordinate the County's policies with those of the City of Gridley, the area of the Gridley-Biggs Plan within the adopted sphere of the City of Gridley should be an "Urban Reserve." To achieve these ends in a manner consistent with the Land Use Element's policies regarding Orderly Development(1.7) and the Housing Element's policy regarding adequate facilities and services (111-2 (d), 2 (h)), the policies below are applicable to this portion of the Gridley-Biggs Area Land Use Plan. ❑ The County's land use policy, zoning and subdivision shall be coordinated with the City of Gridley. =d ❑ The arban residential designatiolnis adjacent to the City of Griffley's ,ed as an "Urban Reserve", permitting rar re i ti development and tises on Fareels of not less than five acres antii stich time as they are need.d for development and adequate set ilable to serve these areas; mid ❑ The Urban Reserve CM)policy shall be aplied to ensure orderly premature growth and extension of urban services does not occur outside the Citi boundaries. Only until such time as necessary urban servicgs are 12rQvided to the parcel targeted for development shall the maximum densitylirltensity of the ultimate land use de$ignation be applied. Prior to urban services being Provided. the minimum parcel size for residential uses within the UR area shall be 5 arra the Permitted uses shall only include those allowed in the AR land usg designation. ❑ Properties planned for industrial or commercial development shall be managed as an "urban reserve" permitting industrial or commercial uses on parcels of not less than 10 acres until such time as they are needed for development and adequate services are available. and ❑ The following shall apply to General Plan amendment.rezoning or subdivision within the UR area. Plans for necessary urban services li.p. sewerage. Water. circulation/roads, storm water management,etc.) shall be completed and required finances shall be secured concurrent with or prior to any proposal that ultimatelx 1 `<a.., ..; :^';8":?.'.;"::"` ..e �.,..,o.;;..,,.:.::': r+•< f� r ;:. ,. 1. involves.the ereahori of.picels<of les �an 5`aeres:for res; nt1 nse oi1.0:acres .. r t "�:;' r 2� ^-•{,yep i' •r,y, "• for comrnerciaUindustnat use To enc��re long term'e�fiency xn clelivenng servic6,.,L_ se plans shall be eooidinateil with the'Cit�Pul lic . .... .. FacHid 9m ftastrueture plans:' Any proposal f6i a General Pimi Onnendhient, rezoning o, subdivision whieh would pernift p=els of less than five acres to be created fOr residentiaf tise 0,, f 6 acres for connnercial or industrial use shaH be eoordinated with the pimis of tile eity of 6ricHey fb& extension of sewer, water, circulation, diainage, and ineans to controi down strewn flooding, prim to or concurrently with.the adoption; mid ❑ Any residential lot which is now less than 5 acres or commercial or industrial lot less than 10 acres which was legally created, pre-existing, and nonconforming may be developed according to its zoning and the provisions of Butte County Code 24-35.and. ❑ Development standards compatible with the City of Gridley shall be utilized for urban development projects within the city's established sphere of influence. ❑ The area added to the Candle S here of Influence bLAFCo Resolution�28 ]:999/OU shall<remam rarC :use de`s° atiQn wiin ankdedonth'an A-40 zone to preserve continued'agricultural uses:until:the<land is annexed to'the City ofGndlev�. • _. . . .. . ....�. .._ ._ SeeTigure LU-4(Gridley Urban Reserve) 2 This This project reflects an action taken by LAFCo in April of 2001to amend the SOI of the City of Gridley. The Board of Supervisors initiated a GP amendment a rezone in June of 2000 Exhibit F in your packet also on the wall behind you behind you show the locations where the genreal Plan and zoning will be amended OO Change the land use designations on the Gridley/Biggs Land Use Map from Low Density Residential and_Medium Density Residential to Agricultural Residential for the ander s to a ed and rezone from SR-1 to SR-5and in Attachment "F." approx 228 acres .� rG 2Z OO Change the land use designations on the Gridley/Biggs Land Use Map from Low Density Residential an to Agricultural Residential for the lands located and rezone from SR-1 to SR-Sand in Attachment"F." ?4VA CA-A S t Skm� W ( l� Sc'Wa 3 Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 S ®Rezone approximate 49 acres located on the east side of Gridley from SR-1 to SR-5, shown t as areas in Attachment "F" a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's Medium Density Residential or the City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed upon this property until municipal services area available for more intense development. 3. Rezone approximately 35 acres from SR-1 to SR-5, shown as area(5) in Attachment "F" with the following finding: Rezone approximately 30 acres from SR to SR-5, located on the northwest side of the Gridley, shown as areas © in Attachment "F" with the following finding: Areas 4,5,6 and part of area 3 re in the SOI. a T AQt-,k 0 LL�ti� AA L Iv 1 ■ ■■■■■IN■■IUB �EMS � �_��.-�_1_ s•nuune.•1®�.�/9u I 111 RII' ft - �■I i 2.•I.y. —• 1� , :�, 'q. �yle■ls:ll� JIlilt": �i .. !Illiir ��• �i�:A�•/1' •^ i��•tis��iiU!Ilt �11/7t1 :� �Q :�— ay �w W 's•fy"�� y�7i1 p��IIS/Ril!i�i R�� I'm f a •'•• �III 71llilt ON i0 illi Ifr?1,i •Is's_•� _ \ �t'- rs w It.l .IS -ti �u n'�Ski` �y%'� i��7� •�6 6�� RiEi�i. _ •Q�� '. - ®i t��lrlyill�7��/ ae r.■i:Q:r„w9-^ •g.s9�► - �. 4 �I� ■ 5AM2r�/_�;Isil`nu u-elle C �,�q1 IN 31,11 -wtrlt�i�i O1 �i�� r:� �•! ��! � � ��i' =—s_._na s_t_9?�'�: ', .• �ss�9us1: ■ ■' ie, ��9.'I =if A --° -• �-y a,�,9 `,�ylasolT7■1li� � — 1 — — ll ®s� 81 .•--L: j_ --s__ 01 ,e��-�� _■:-=51111 :ais its riiiiii ii'ti3�iu� �� g��• � �� 1� o_'� •I:ttl HIt9�EUEU!:'.f'� 1171+'1�'�� —�u ' . �uc .nv 9alrau• � 41��- wuaq '- f9//!q■1'671 11lL1 ��YII■t■/- gp _R 9117 1�1 Ia11Slt7 ■■ __� � -- � � $� 1' - 11 SIR IS • .pal�.r+ ■ '�nnnnn7lr 1 _ d • ' 1 GRIDLEY AREA ! ' • 01-02 Resolution Date Butte County Board 1 Supervisors Buford, Tom From: Price, Richard Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:21 AM To: Buford, Tom Subject:, FW: web site feedback Monday 12/3/2001 time 5:01:55 PM Tom-I thought you might be interested in this request for information from the mayor of Gridley. Richard -----Original Message----- From: Scheer, Stephen Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10: 18 AM To: Price, Richard Subject: FW: web site feedback Monday 12/3/2001 time 5:01: 55 PM- -----Original M-----Original Message----- From: frankcook@mail.com [mailto:frankcook@mail.com] Sent: Monday', /December 03, 2001 5:02 PM To: sscheer@buttecounty.net Subject : web site feedback Monday 12/3/2001 time 5:01:55 PM Mayor Frank W. Cook from 10. 1.2.26 category request Richard, at one time Butte County was proposing a general plan update with a new ag element, which included a requirement for a 300 foot buffer between Ag land and residential development. Was it ever adopted? Thanks, Mayor Frank Cook City of Gridley 1 ' NOTICE OF DETERMINATIC VB TO: Office of Plan.& Research Dept. JK 1400 Tenth StreetSacramento, CA 95814 X Butte County Clerk FROM: Butte County PlanningY 7 County Center Dr., Oroville 95965 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: GPA/RZ 01-02, General Plan Amendment and Rezone AP Number: Various Applicant: Butte County Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 State Clearinghouse Number(If submitted to clearinghouse): Contact Person: Craig Sanders Telephone Number: 538-7601 Project Location: in and around the Sphere of Influence of the City of Gridley. Project Description: General Plan Amendment changing land use designations on the Gridley/Biggs Area Plan Map, as well as amendments to the Gridley Urban Reserve Map and policies in the Land Use Element. Associated rezones are recommended to bring zoning into conformity with This is to advise that the Butte County Board of Supervisors has approved the above-described project on May 22, 2001, and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1. The project will, _X_will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. _X_ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were,_X_were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations was, _X_was not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at: Date received for filing and posting at OPR Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Rgnify Wilso Principal Planner DECLARATION OF FEES DLr.- (California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Butte County Board of Supervisors 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 FILING NO. Project Title/file number: CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION ( ) A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee (X ) B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED ( ) A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee ( ) B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. ( ) OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT/NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. ( ) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). J 2. ( X ) NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. - Board of Supervisors Chief Planning Official By: Rand Wilson Y Title: Principal Planner Lead Agency: Butte County Department of Development Services Date: _June 7. 2001 TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. rA / • CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FILING FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding (Fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4; Section 753.5c, Title 14, California Code of Regulations) Project Title/Butte County Location: GPA/RZ 01-02, in and around the Sphere of Influence of the City of Gridley. Project Description: General Plan Amendment changing land use designations on the Gridley/Biggs Area Plan Map, as well as amendments to the Gridley Urban Reserve Map and policies in the Land Use Element. Associated rezones are recommended to bring zoning into conformity with Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The County of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a Negative Declaration so as to evaluate the potential of this project for adverse environmental impact: 2. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence before the County that the project will have potential for an adverse impact on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. 3. The County of Butte has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5 (d), of Title 14, California Code of Regulations, if applicable. 4. The project is hereby found to be de minimis in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the State Fish and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. Certification: I hereby certify that the County of Butte has made the above findings of fact and that based upon the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. n / By: � Randy Wi son Principal Planner. Lead Agency: County of 3utte Date: June 7, 2001 BUTTE ,fiOUNTY CLERK OF THE BOARD USE ONLY BOD OF SUPERVIS-.:.:S MEETING DATE: AGENDA TRANSMITTAL t . AGENDA ITEM:,, ,. AGENDATITLE: Butte County Board of Supervisors - GPA/RZ 01-02 Gridley/Biggs , ,.. DEPARTMENT: DDS, PlanningTPHONE- . TE: 4/11/0' 1 MEETING DATE REQUESTED: CONTACT:.-Craig Sanders 7603 - REGULAR — CONSENT DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Planning Commission Action Report to the Board of Supervisors for Board of Supervisors General Plan and Rezone for the area in and around the Sphere of Influence of the City of Gridley. (CBS) (GPA/RZ 01-02) Pursuant to Butte County Code Sections 24-30(b),24-25.30 and 24-25.40(a) & (b), the Board shall set this General Plan Amendment for a public hearing within ninety days of receiving the Action Report from the Planning Commission and shall give notice of the hearing date at least ten days prior to the hearing. If no action is taken by the Board within the ninety days, the proposed General Plan Amendment shall be deemed denied. AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL REQUIRES THE ORIGINAL AND NINE (9) COPIES ATTACH EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM AND OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION AS NECESSARY Budgetary Impact: Yes No CAO OFFICE USE ONLY If yes,complete Budgetary Impact Worksheet on back Budget Transfer Requested: Yes No Administrative Office Review If yes,complete Budget Transfer Request Worksheet on back. Administrative Office Staff Contact (Deadline is one business day prior to normal agenda deadline) Will Proposal Require an Agreement: Yes No 4/5's Vote Required: Yes: No: Auditor-Controller's Number(if required): County Counsel's Approval: Yes No Date Received by Clerk of Board: Will Proposal Require Additional Personnel: Yes No Number of Permanent: Temp Extra Help Previous Board Action Date: Additional Information Attached:Yes No Describe: Rev.1198 T SPEC _L INSTRUCTIONS TO CLER. Number of originals required to be returned to Department: "Please Note" Department is responsible for returning contract to contractor. -Clerk of the Board returns_ completed Auditor's copy ONLY. Requested Board Action: ordinance Required Resolution Required Minute Order Required For Information Only Y BUDGETARY IMPACT WORKSHEET Cygent Year Estimated Cost/Funding Source Source of Additional Funds Requested Estimated Cost $ Contingencies $ (Fund Name: ) (Fund Number.. ) Amount Budgeted $ Unanticipated Revenue $ (Budget unit Number: ) (Source: ) (Fund Name: ) (Rev.Code: ) (Fund Number: ) Other Transfer(s) $ 1. Complete worksheet below 2. Deadline is one business day REM to normal agenda deadline Additional Requested $ Total Source of Funds $ 1 Annualized cost$ if also planned for next year. Budget Transfer Authorized By Administrative Office Board Action Required for B-Transfer? Yes No Authorized Signature Date BUDGET TRANSFER REQUEST WORKSHEET Transfer Request: AMOUNT LINE ITEM LINE ITEM Transfer$ (No Cents)From To Transfer$ (No Cents)From To Transfer S (No Cents)From To Transfer$ (No Cents)From To PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION REPORT APPLICANT: Butte County Board of Supervisors OWNER: VARIOUS FILE#: GPA/RZ O1-02 REQUEST: General Plan Amendment changing land use designations on the Gridley/Biggs Area Plan Map, as well as amendments to the Gridley Urban Reserve Map and policies in the Land Use Element. Associated rezones are recommended to bring zoning into conformity with the land use designations. LOCATION: The property is located in and around the Sphere of Influence of the City of Gridley. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AND SUPPORTING FINDINGS: A. Recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts to the Board of Supervisors, with the following findings: 1. Find that an Initial Study was completed incompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, that said study did not identify significant environmental effects, and that a Negative Declaration is proposed. 2. Find that the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. 1 Find, on the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study and any comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the Rezone and General Plan Amendment for Butte County Board of Supervisors,Planning Division File No. GPA/RZ 01-02 will have a significant effect on the environment. 4. Find that the proposed Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. 5. Adopt the Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts. B. Recommend a"de minimus"exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat be adopted. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The project site is not known to contain any species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or regionat plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5. is not required. C. Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution amending the Butte County General Plan as follows with the included findings: Land Use Man 1. Change the land use designations on the Gridley/Biggs Land Use Map from Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential to Agricultural Residential for the lands located on the south and east side of Gridley, inside and just outside, the sphere of influence, shown as areas Oand O in Attachment "F." The proposed change is supported by the following findings: a. Based on the analysis in the City of Gridley's General Plan, the subject land will not be needed for urban development in the next 20 years. b. The subject land meets the Agricultural Residential site designation criteria in the Butte County Land Use Element on page LUE 51. C. The Agricultural Residential designation will act as a buffer between urban uses and intensive agricultural uses,consistent with Policy 2.Lf. of the Land Use Element. Urban Reserve Policy and Map 2. Amend the Gridley Urban Reserve policy as provided in Attachment 'I" 3. Amend Figure LU-4 of the Land Use Element showing the Gridley Urban Reserve area to reflect the amendments made to the SOI adopted by LAFCo on April 6,2000, as shown in Attachment "H." These amendments are supported by the following findings a. The new Urban Reserve Boundary, including the 300-foot buffer along the interface of the new SOI boundary on the north side of Gridley, as depicted in Attachment"H,"is consistent with the Butte County General Plan because it implements the following General Plan policies and programs: LUE 1.2.a. Plan for future development of all incorporated and unincorporated areas with county boundaries. LUE 1.2.b. Consult with incorporated cities and neighboring counties in the development of planning proposals for areas of mutual concern. LUE 1.7.a. Encourage annexation to existing cities and existing districts. LUE 1.7.b. Promote the full utilization of sites served by existing public facilities. LUE 1.7.c. Encourage development in and around existing communities with public facilities. LUE 2.Lf. Allow rural residential development as a buffer between urban development and intensive crop land. AE 1.6 Work with LAFCo to create and maintain a consistent approach to the conservation of agricultural land through the designation of reasonable and logical Sphere of Influence boundaries. Support future annexations and Sphere of Influence amendments only when in compliance with the Agricultural Element and LAFCo policies and procedures. It is not the intent of this Element to preclude cities from expansion. AE 1.8 A planning area for the cities of Gridley and Biggs, which is beyond the existing Spheres of Influence should be defined by each city to reflect each city's area of interest. General plan amendments, Spheres of Influence modifications, and finally, annexation of those areas of interest is the legally required process. Upon annexation of the areas of interest, the city general plan and zoning will apply. Until that time,the County General Plan and zoning will apply. The County will participate in a cooperative manner in this process as requested by the cities and as County resources permit. Until annexed, the area will be designated by the County as productive agricultural land,and also because retention in larger tracts will be most beneficial to the cities if the land is eventually developed. AE 2.2 Encourage urban infill development within city limits and within existing unincorporated communities where development can more easily and readily be served by public infrastructure facilities. AE 2.5 Encourage urban development to the LAFCo adopted Spheres of Influence. Program AE 2.6 Utilize the LAFCo adopted Spheres of Influence for the cities and the identified unincorporated community cores as areas for urban and/or more intensive development. Restrict urban and intensive development to those areas outside agriculture and other low-intensity uses. D. Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance rezoning areas in and around Gridley's Sphere of Influence as follows with the included findings: 1. Rezone approximately 228 acres from SR-1 to SR-5,shown as areas O and O in Attachment "F."This is supported by the fol'-'owing findings: a. The SR-5 zone is listed as a consistent zoning designation in the Butte County General Plan for the Agricultural Residential land use designation. b. The physical characteristics of the area will support development at a density of 1 dwelling unit per 5.acres. 2. Rezone approximately 49 acres located on the east side of Gridley from SR-1 to SR-5, shown as area® in Attachment "F" with the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's Medium Density Residential ,or the City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed upon this property until municipal services area available for more intense development. 3. Rezone approximately 30 acres from SR to SR-5, located on the northwest side of the Gridley, shown as area©in Attachment "F" with the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's Medium Density Residential or the City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed on this property until municipal services area available to allow more intense development. 4. Rezone approximately 35 acres from SR-1 to SR-5, shown as area' (& in Attachment "F" with the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's and City's Low Density Residential land use designations,is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more. accurately reflects the limitations placed on this property until municipal services area available to allow more intense development. VOTE: 4-0 AYES: Commissioners Mooney, Lambert, Leland, and Chairman Nelson . NOES: No one ABSENT: Commissioner Marin ABSTAINED: No one DATE OF LAST HEARING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION: March 8, 2001 K:\PLANNING\PROJECTS\GPA\GRIDLEY\ACTION.RPT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT - March 8, 2000 Applicant: Butte County Board of Supervisors Density Residential, Agricultural Residential File#: GPA/RZ 01-0,0, Zoning: SR, SR-1, A-5, Request: General Plan Amendment changing 1 land use designations on the APN: Various Gridley Biggs Area Plan Map, as well as amendments to the Gridley Location: In and around the Sphere of Urban Reserve Map and policies in Influence of the City of Gridley the Land Use Element. Associated rezones are recommended to bring Parcel Size: Various zoning into conformity with the land use designations Zone date: Various G.P.: Low Density Residential, Medium At the direction of the Board of Supervisors on June 12, 2000, staff has prepared various amendments to implement LAFCo's recent resolution amending the Gridley Sphere of Influence(SOI). These amendments involve changes to the Land Use Element and rezoning of applicable lands to address and implement this resolution. I. OVERVIEW A. Background Toward the end of 1999,LAFCo reviewed the City of Gridley's request to consider the expansion of its SOI. The intent of the request was to accommodate the anticipated growth in the 1999 Gridley General Plan. This SOI is "a plan for the probable physical boundaries and service area..."for the City through the year 2020. On April 6,2000,LAFCo adopted findings (refer to Attachment "A") for a revised SOI including conditions which will be considered when unincorporated properties are proposed for annexation. In particular, Section 3 established the specific terms and conditions of the revised SOI. B. Scope LAFCo's resolution removed some properties located in.the southeast area of the City from the SOI(refer to Attachment`B"). These properties,with the exception of one, form a strip of land to the east of the SOI boundaries. This strip is bordered by E.Gridley Road to the north,Sheldon Avenue to the south,Humble Avenue/extension to the east,and Bonnell Avenue/extension to the 1 west. Also removed from the SOI was a separate property located to the south of Sheldon Avenue and east of State Highway 99. The totalland area of the mentioned properties is approximately 136 acres. The area added to the SOI, and also to the Urban Reserve (approximately 283 acres),is located primarily to the north of the City limits,east of West Biggs Gridley Road and west of the proposed SR 99 Bypass (refer to Attachment"C"). The next two sections include preliminary analyses and alternatives that address issues resulting from the revised SOI; additional land use issues inside and outside the SOI are also examined. Sections II and III address Supervisor Josiassen's concerns outlined in his letter to the Director of Development Services relative to the same issues (refer to Attachment"D"). II. ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION A. Gridley Urban Reserve Policy The Butte County General Plan states that "...the area of the Gridley-Biggs Plan within the adopted SOI of the City of Gridley should be an Urban Reserve." The intent is to preserve different residential density options for the time frame of the plan, coordinate the County's policies with those of the City,and achieve orderly growth within the SOI. In light of LAFCo's action, examination of the General Plan narrative and map related to the Urban Reserve policy has revealed that inconsistencies exist. The Land Use Element's narrative specifies the area between the City Limits and the SOI as being the Urban Reserve;removal of the 136 acres from the SOI would nullify the application of the Urban Reserve policy on these properties. However, a map(Figure LU-4,Attachment"E")is included in this element which designates the 136 acres as Urban Reserve. This results in land use challenges relative to these properties; the integrity of the existing agricultural land, as well as the area's rural character will be threatened. In adopting the SOI resolution,LAFCo acknowledged that the 136-acre area would remain in the Urban Reserve until the County amended Figure LU-4. The City of Gridley and LAFCo would like these lands to be maintained as an agricultural buffer with a 5-acre minimum lot size, consistent with the intent of the Urban Reserve policy. B. Land Use Issues The following provides detailed information on the land use status and issues inside and outside the SOI. The land use designations, policies, zoning, and other related data are analyzed to establish a basis for alternative approaches to address these issues. 1. Outside the SOI The land use issue related to properties described below concerns the General Plan and/or zoning that allows a potentially more intense development pattern along the border of the SOI. a. Low Density Residential (LDR) and Medium Density Residential (MDR) are the County land use designations applied to the 136 acres. The Suburban Residential- 2 one acre (SR-1) zoning district covers most of this land (refer to Attachment "F," Proposed Modifications Outside the SOI (D). This area has developed into a mix of agricultural and rural residential uses; the Urban Reserve policy has been effective in preventing continued land divisions to smaller lot sizes. Also, the subject properties are situated in an area that was studied in the 1999 amendments to the City of Gridley General Plan. The Land Use and the Public Facilities Elements of this plan include these properties in a development phase that is beyond the horizon of the 20-year plan. Moreover, one of the site criteria for the County LDR/MDR designations is that the subject area must be needed for urban residential development within 20 years. Maintaining the LDR/MDR designations on the subject properties represents an inconsistency and would not be in keeping with the rural environment of the unincorporated territories. Applying an appropriate policy/tool to maintain the existing agricultural/rural residential character is necessary to achieve consistency. This will also achieve the intent of coordinating the County's policies with those of the City and implement LAFCo's action on these lands. Without appropriate changes to the land use designations and/or zoning,the subject land could potentially be further subdivided to the minimum parcel size of 6,500 s.f. b. Located to the southwest and northwest of the City limits, outside the SOI, are four additional areas(Attachment"F,"Proposed Modifications OO and OO )with land use issues similar to the above described properties. The first area (O in Attachment "F") is situated to the southwest of the SOI; the properties have an LDR land use designation and are zoned A-5. The second area(O in attachment"F")is comprised of two similar territories.The first is bordered by Justeson Road to the north and the SOI boundaries to the east and south. The other is located west of Biggs Gridley Road and north of Macedo Road. These latter properties have a land use designation of Agricultural Residential (AR) and are zoned SR-1. 2. Inside the SOI The land use issue related to properties described below concerns their current zoning which allows for 1-acre development inconsistent with the intent of Urban Reserve(refer to Attachment"G," City of Gridley Planning Director's - Ms. Jo Sherman- letter). a. To the east, properties located between the City limits and Bonnell Avenue (Attachment"F,"Proposed Modification(@). The County land use designation for these properties is MDR and the zoning is SR-1; b. To the south, two clusters of properties located west of the industrial area within proximity of Little Avenue and Vermont Street(Attachment"F,"OO). The County land use designation for these properties is LDR and the zoning is SR-1; C. To the northwest, a property located south of Peach Street extension and a property 3 located east of W.Biggs Gridley Road and north of Justeson Road(Attachment"F," ©). The County land use designation for these properties is MDR and the zoning is S-R. III. ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES AND PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS A. Land Use Proposals/Alternatives 1. Outside the SOI a. Staff has conducted a preliminary land use analysis to address the above mentioned land use issues resulting from LAFCo's recent action. After analyzing the existing conditions and General Plan Policies applicable to area (D, Attachment "F," the following alternatives emerge. Located outside the sphere of influence, these areas should not remain in land use designations of LDR and MDR. The LDR and MDR designations should only be applied to lands needed for development in the next 20 years. The most appropriate designation would appear to be Agricultural Residential due to the way the land has already been divided and based on the following site designation criteria from the Land Use Element: 1. Beyond service areas of community water and sewer systems. 2. Less than 30% slopes. 3. Adjacent or near to existing roads and public utilities. 4. Not within flood plains or known active faults. 5. Past official actions. The Agricultural Residential designation is also consistent with the land use designation to the east of this area. An appropriate zoning district should be .applied to implement the Agricultural Residential land use designation. The current SR-1 zone is consistent with the Agricultural Residential designation; however, a 5-acre minimum is recommended as more appropriate to maintain a buffer between urban uses and more intense agricultural uses. The City of Gridley has also requested that a 5-acre minimum be used to reduce suburban residential densities which, if too high, could impact city infrastructure. The Planning Commission is currently considering phasing out the A-5 zone as part of the 1995 Agricultural Element implementation program. In light of this possibility,the AR-5 or SR-5 would be the most appropriate zones to apply. Both zones would allow continued agricultural operations. The most significant difference between the two zones is that AR-5 would permit multi-family dwelling units subject to 'a Use Permit and SR-5 would not. Given that the Agricultural Residential General Plan designation does not list multi-family dwellings as a consistent use, the SR-5 zone would be the most appropriate zone. 4 b. With regard to the two properties to the southwest (Proposed Modifications OO , Attachment 7"), the development phase of the mentioned areas together with their need for public improvements would not materialize before 20 years. To address land use issues within and surrounding the SOI comprehensively,staff recommends consideration of a land use designation change to AR. Since the subject properties are currently zoned A-5, rezoning would not be needed. This would achieve consistency of the land use policy application outside the SOI and maintain orderly development of properties within close proximity to the SOI. The same issues apply to areas(D previously discussed. The recommended change in the General Plan land use designation is from Low Density Residential to Agricultural Residential. As the zoning is already A-5, no change is recommended. C. Addressing the land use issue in Item II.3.I.b. (Proposed modification area OO) should be consistent with the alternatives mentioned in Item III.A.1a. Therefore, staff recommends consideration of a zoning change from SR-1 to SR-5 while maintaining the land use designation as Agricultural Residential. Summary of Proposed Modifications Outside the SOI (Refer to Attachment "F") Proposed Modification Q Proposed Modification Proposed Modification Alternative a b c General Plan Land Use AR AR AR(no change) Designation Zoning District SR-5 A-5 AR-5 A-5 no chane SR-5 2. Inside the SOI If adopted,the text amendment proposed in Item E.2.below would place the interpretation and implementation of the Urban Reserve policy on firmer ground. The absence of an appropriate implementing zoning district in certain areas within the SOI may create confusion for current property owners and potential buyers. Therefore, the proposed zoning changes in the following table would create more clarity to the public and ascertain proper implementation. This proposal was made in cooperation with the City of Gridley and in response to their concern. 5 Summary of Proposed Modifications Inside the SOI (Refer to Attachment "F") Proposed Modification Proposed Modification Proposed Modification General Plan Land MDR LOW DENSITY MDR Use Designation (no change) RESIDENTIAL (no change) (no change) ,LKoning District SR-5 SR-5 J SR-5 B. Additional Modifications 1. 300 foot Agricultural Buffer The Agriculture Element of the General Plan requires that a buffer be established on property proposed for residential development in order to protect existing agriculture uses from incompatible use conflicts." Consistent with this; LAFCo established a 300-foot buffer along the unincorporated boundary of the amended SOI. LAFCo further determined that this buffer shall be flexible in location, but will always be at the boundary of the interface with the unincorporated agricultural land and the SOI. However, it is important to note that the Agricultural Element recognizes the possibility of studying future urbanization within the corridor area between Gridley and Biggs (Goal 1,Policy 1.3). At the time such a study is completed, the need for this buffer shall be reconsidered. 2. Land Use Element Amendment To accurately interpret the intent of the County General Plan regarding orderly growth within the Urban Reserve area, staff also recommends some amendments to the General Plan text(Page LUE 92-Gridley-Biggs Area Land Use Plan). The intent of this amendment is to prevent subdividing the existing parcels to less than 5 acres until such time as adequate services are available and the need for conversion to urban residential is appropriate(refer to Attachment "I"). In addition, the Land Use Element includes a map (Figure LU-4) depicting the areas where the Urban Reserve policy is applied. This map does not accurately reflect the intent of this policy. Staff, therefore, recommends that this map be replaced (Attachment"H" should be considered as the replacement). IV. CEOA ISSUES An initial study was prepared for this project and no significant impacts were identified. The actions proposed by this project are to bring the zoning and/or General Plan into consistency with the Urban Reserve policy and reduce zoning densities from a 1-acre minimum or less to a 5-acre minimum. This reduction in density will therefore reduce potential impacts when these lands are actually developed. The impacts associated with the change in the SOI were addressed in an Environmental Impact Report prepared and adopted by LAFCo for the SOI amendment. 6 V. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: A. Recommend adoption of a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts to the Board of Supervisors, with the following findings: 1. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, that said study did not identify significant environmental effects, and that a Negative Declaration is proposed. 2. Find that the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. 3. Find, on the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study and any comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the Rezone and General Plan Amendment for Butte County Board of Supervisors, Planning Division File No. GPA/RZ 01-02 will have a significant effect on the.environment. 4. Find that the proposed Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. 5. Adopt the Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts. B. Recommend a"de minimus" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The project site is not known to contain any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3)and 14 CCR 753.5. is not required. C. Recommend that the Planning Commission recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution amending the Butte County General Plan as follows with the included findings: Land Use Man 1. Change the land use designations on the Gridley/Biggs Land Use Map from Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential to Agricultural Residential for the lands located on the south and east side of Gridley inside and just outside the sphere of influence, shown as areas (land OO in Attachment "F." The proposed change is supported by the following findings: a. Based on the analysis in the City of Gridley's General Plan,the subject land will not be needed for urban development in the next 20 years. 7 b. The subject land meets the Agricultural Residential site designation criteria in the Butte County Land Use Element on page LUE 51. C. The Agricultural Residential designation will act as a buffer between urban uses and intensive agricultural use consistent with Policy 2.Lf. of the Land Use Element. Urban Reserve Policy and Map 2. Amend the Gridley Urban Reserve policy as provided in Attachment "I." 3. Amend Figure LU-4 of the Land Use Element showing the Gridley Urban Reserve area to reflect the amendments made to the SOI adopted by LAFCo on April 6,2000,as shown in Attachment "H." These amendments are supported by the following findings a. The new Urban Reserve Boundary,including the 300-foot buffer along the interface of the new SOI boundary on the north side of Gridley, as depicted in Attachment "H," is consistent with the Butte County General Plan because it implements the following General Plan policies and programs: LUE 1.2.a. Plan for future development of all incorporated and unincorporated areas with county boundaries. LUE 1.2.b. Consult with incorporated cines and neighboring counties in the development of planning proposals for areas of mutual concern. LUE 1.7.a. Encourage annexation to existing cities and existing districts. LUE 1.7.b. Promote,the full utilization of sites served by existing public facilities. LUE 1.7.c. Encourage development in and around existing communities with public facilities. LUE 2.1.f. Allow rural residential development as a buffer between urban development and intensive crop land. AE 1.6 Work with LAFCo to create and maintain a consistent approach to the conservation of agricultural land through the designation of reasonable and logical Sphere of Influence boundaries. Support future annexations and Sphere of Influence amendments only when in compliance with the Agricultural Element and LAFCo policies and procedures. It is not the intent of this Element to preclude cities from expansion. AE 1.8 A planning area for the cities of Gridley and Biggs,which is beyond the existing Spheres of Influence should be defined by each city to reflect each city's area of interest. General plan amendments, Spheres of Influence modifications, and finally, annexation of those areas of 8 interest is the legally required process. Upon annexation of the areas of interest,the city general plan and zoning will apply. Until that time,the County General Plan and zoning will apply. The County will participate in a cooperative manner in this process as requested by the cities and as County resources permit. Until annexed,the area will be designated by the County as productive agricultural land, and also because retention in larger tracts will be most beneficial to the cities if the land is eventually developed. AE 2.2 Encourage urban infill development within city limits and within existing unincorporated communities where development can more easily and readily be served by public infrastructure facilities. AE 2.5 Encourage urban development to the LAFCo adopted Spheres of Influence. Program AE 2.6 Utilize the LAFCo adopted Spheres of Influence for the cities and the identified unincorporated community cores as areas for urban and/or more intensive development. Restrict urban and intensive development to those areas outside agriculture and other low-intensity uses. D. Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance rezoning areas in and around the Gridley's Sphere of Influence as follows with the included findings: 1. Rezone approximately 228 acres from SR-1 to SR-5, shown as areas (D and ® in Attachment "F." This is supported by the following findings: a. The SR-5 zone is listed as a consistent zoning designation in the Butte County General Plan for the Agricultural Residential land use designation. b. The physical characteristics of the area will support development at a density of 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres. 2. Rezone approximately 49 acres located on the east side of Gridley from SR-1 to SR-5, shown as areas ® in Attachment "F"with the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's Medium Density Residential or the City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed upon this property until municipal services area available for more intense development. 3. Rezone approximately 30 acres from SR to SR-5, located on the northwest side of the Gridley, shown as areas © in Attachment "F" with the following finding: 9 a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's Medium Density Residential or the City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed on this property until municipal services area available to allow more intense development. 4. Rezone approximately 35 acres from SR-1 to SR-5, shown as area 50 in Attachment "F" with the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's and City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed on this property until municipal services area available to allow more intense development. Attachments Page Attachment A. LAFCo's Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Attachment B. Sphere of Influence (SOI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Attachment C. Proposed Gridley Urban Reserve change areas . . . . . . . . 19 Attachment D. Supervisor Curt Josiassen's Letter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Attachment E. Figure LU-4, Gridley Urban Reserve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Attachment F. General Plan Land Use Designations and Zoning . .. . . . . 22 Attachment G. City of Gridley Planning Director's Letter . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Attachment H. Proposed Figure LU-4, Gridley Urban Reserve. . . . . . . . 24 Attachment I. Modified text for the Gridley Urban Reserve . . . . . . . . . . 25 Attachment J. Initial Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Attachment K. Recommended General Plan Land Use Designations and Zoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 10 «�� ,L1�3Ti�IHa�,LZ� II ORDINANCE NO. 3723 AN ORDINANCE ZONING PORTIONS OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO BUTTE COUNTY CODE SECTION 24-25.40. 1 The Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, 2 under and pursuant to Section 24-25.40 of the Butte County Code, ORDAINS, as 3 follows: 4 SECTION 1. The hereinafter described area situate in the County of 5 s. Butte, State of California, shall be and it is hereby zoned as a Suburban Residential 7 5 acre minimum parcel size District - SR-5, and such area shall be subject to the 8 restrictions and restricted uses and regulations pursuant to Butte County Code 9 Section 24-135. 10 Said area so zoned being located in the unincorporated area of Butte 11 County, around the City of Gridley, more particularly described as follows: 12 All that property located S of Locust St., E. of Oregon Street, N. of 13 Little Street and W. of Vermont Street, excepting therefrom that 14 portion located within the City of Gridley. 15 Lot 1 of Gridley Colony No. 4 recorded in book 6, page 8 of the official records of Butte County on file in the office of the Butte County is Recorder. 17 The westerly 120 ft. of the southerly 426.85 ft. of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 18 1 T1 7N, R2E MDB&M and the westerly 110 ft. of the northerly 326 ft. of the southerly 752.85 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 1 T1 7N R2E MDB&M. 19 That portion of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 1 T1 7N, R2E 20. MDB&M located NW of the NW line of Butte Water District Lateral No.. 4. 21 22 The N '/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 35 T1 8N,,R2E MDB&M 23 Lots 7 & 8 of Beale Tract, per map of,record in Map Book 7, page 46 on file in the office of the Butte County Recorder, excepting therefrom 24 that portion located within the City of Gridley. 25 Lots 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 39, 40, 26 41, 45, 46, 47, 48, those portions of Lots 7 and 24 located SE of Lateral No. 4 of Butte Water District, the northerly 300 ft. of Lot 29, 1 Lot 42, 49, 50, Lots 51, 52 excepting therefrom the westerly 390 ft. of Lot 51 and the easterly 41.25 ft. of Lot 52, of the Gridley Colony No. 2 6 recorded in Book 5, Page 20 of the official records of Butte County. 3 Lots 1 and 2 of that map of record in Book 46, page 95 on file on file 4 in the office of the Butte County Recorder. 5 Lots 1, 2, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of the Gridley Colony No. 11 recorded in 6 Book 6, Page 56 of the official records of Butte County. 7 Lots 19 and 20 of Gridley Colony No. 8 recorded in Book 6, Page 55 of the official records of Butte County. 8 SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be and it is hereby declared to be 9 10 in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after the date of its passage, 11 and before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage, this 12 Ordinance-shall be published once with the names of the members of the Board of 13 Supervisors voting for and against it in the Gridley Herald, a newspaper published 14 in the County of Butte, State of California. 15 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the 16 County of Butte, State of California, on the 22ndday of May . 2001, by the following 17 vote: 18 19 AYES: Supervisors Beeler, Dolan, Houx, Yamaguchi and Chair Josiassen 20 NOES: None 21 ABSENT: None 22 NOT VOTING: None 23 24 *Be siasen, CHAIRMAN unty Board of Supervisors 25 26 I 1 ATTEST: JOHN S. BLACKLOCK, Chief Administrative Officer and Clerk of the Board 2 3 4or BY 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ,19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 14F .� R ,4 *r• _ a'i E o->g,' `; + �z� +� yy3 ^c :s ^ ;, t '"` '32. - �{ ,e e�h�'•.,. � ..,9�'"iY' ,�q� s�"�� - -. ew`e;�, '''?�'•C �m� a. �y. G{g y, ��r+ a y.tet` 3� l �' � ��'9'.• � S; '� �"�j^'SY' •W b �" ,} -i&'e � 'W7+'C` hi m+�F �r p�i.a �..$+�� f �` R�� '� .c•� '� �3}�K '�"'C~,�� ' T��M� y1'. P��IMT � v�� N1�®E�� Yy�k e a � r- t'�C'nx �-, r �'. �k• u Y�1µ ..a ,��v-''�f �''�xCsa3am� �"'•' , t ,.•*..s zw•� 1J"""'.- .'�f,4t'. x; Y - .rr. _ asi�YP�t%&" T• e � i• .7 "Yo-.�e: }. .:+y'`;e. 1 r 1 � 11 d k � � .},et��s5r, � r. �'' f;-,�-��- t��vat�'.,�.•< �`�y, '�" � +�': � '�ey � m.. `e`5:. � �U �s�: �,� ��' �s`},�a w •s +x ®. �` �•---- ., 'mss}� `'�'a a��i �� `3�L ,r° ' .i a u 'pis #. �'�. _ x;n,.-.' f '' .+,. \r }n s+x s:-. :..yr..:- \ �'y ° ie$ i•�slrF'xB•icr'_ _ .r t -+s..is 3..5 7` C, `y^`F V. Ilt��_� - �s `�.•�*�S "i�A i;` `�- t r k! Y�.a .r f rI;v : 1 IE 1 1I ' I _.t'Sl � ,.3. . lFF ' "F: d:• yY' I1II..ct, 4 S9• s3• 't+F•la '• "++ p r G l'". . ¢vrcaucvmsaza°rv:ea�c_^m•••�-s. L i r s:�i«. n Ylt S,<�� `,155 h ME �k� T fig I�Ly �J�'� � I■'/ A■ a .'tC:�BzU, a ■ �•% Ir-R1.111 .;u.;no►� � -un e'�y �.`S'` Legend n r _ ■ _L�r7lu:mlym ay^ ,>,^'i �' xm � s: w. ?•wrc??G'car.�&71�� .II�R : - •� f� 711 lusn Yl:s,..,...1 _ Sl, u? 1 � 'Ec � 'r•�i 11�I'n� -. Itll - ■:r- ! �J�il■ Y. :1' n Sphere 1 Influence s� ;•��'. � '� ' �s' � .�. !yg� .•1•_l ��=�_iili. � f1 � ra7u a !F... AI+ ;;o••' N ��alltil E/J.i11Si ii , .: �� . o i ,i/llil�l!`1141�9nt `' �'t7t'i ;� a•. 1 1 1 W SA 3 ° _q• c `��'i G V, IISI�G'lll�1►rIR� i ,� a ggg___ ,i r ■ -r I i+ lis n91 61 •��j il ��s�i-�` �� /�lSIlGllllil Gridley,,t3. cg r �__ k?I7"^...:9�9 y s' a ��_ ts - J I 1 1��F,i9�.:��li.6i\�•+ .-� al�\:`'� ��,t�s.i J�ISiG� `r •.• _ t xr 11 ,_ F■ ■t n Ni •'• v AE I Ritll7L'": _ y J:1 a ! R�ii li n41 �:/II.'� :la."�•�,DA" I�,�,��.•.� -' tt 19�m : 9 °=::'� y ■ ..rpnls�a�n_:R7 �`► �1�f�.Oki,�a' �i 11 Op 5 (perGeneral1Legend, t � rlfl'm_iSa�� a'ra�rli'►.flz6 I-. •!:. .1� sssis� /r9y-I!'♦nl/ Irl �a� Ir_- sr_n__e.�+ '_I_=�f'�1 ��1��ursnsllOME s�.� � � I I A� ��•� il•`e'� v'�,,�i■n�ul`I�IlfSiO �I' 1y _dl's_ . 6' .ii , ';`�: 5.:,• t�� Orchard' 1Crops 9;�"`'� � a�''�•' � �'_' o� _� ++1/'11�. illbe•��'�'�Il1 9111iJO�-- ,.+,r•�' aYt r ri S .�» _ I� ir_. ♦• ' o o �$. [': Sok laeY = Is_ I �� ISI 2 N IN III�E-1R=� r �,�_ii. Agricultural Residential .—--. ,_�y19►� � fir� ![ilii�i_ � °P � �,.�, gl !7 =LE..:i� � e511nli�IZ-r �\': I�'�'� l� ® _�: S dfia , '4St ® 2,}„ R ��I ■ � ria IrSli r O•��[,IaJ��®��L.. ��6�L'f�5�� .. '"'}' ti ■uns.■e.nsuu�°snF.n. 5 I I• 1$ytiL._.�(�_ r Low Denity-ResidentialL ~ •'�.+�. ., _ �DueYu-■Isaac nrsur.■�� r ��hdlli II w +°: ❑■ �� ''89.,; `" 5� s�s �^kf � � —. ,... ■�■.�Isn�il%unl c/IlsunliJ��l�i= �:® `.9 _ �1�a°��®�YRL'�" C_.!� �� 5��. a�� - Min ■IJ/15 / 11 1 1 1 IC iOe°ue/ "IN.— rev aae cent; hi- . -, + �� l . t !05_ 4t� r / 11111 DELI NO d '� 4�"�Jrnl aro ;,., ,,.asr; i3`':'',r yxt .�i,•'r •i -F.. '`nr".Lx,d""� "PJ fry-3 Proposed s 1•`rrs Iss �'��g, t + i IKR I 1 rHJ & d e r v [Cs�•�. ' ,11(( itr' i .J�1^'rt ; .�F./ { m I�� General- r 1 m On,E',. ;,p1,T.s p+.ssi4tl kYm C"ts ® r,�r,,'.s�..,.ri d-•17n. .,s .�. �, .i a ttiil2 � ...a`� � ; � ��J�€7t6 "• ,�I s' a` k O I ON ;•tet ` �• 's '0 m,+. 6fi713a �N s„vrZoning I �' jjP LiT .a O SIR nl�`� !�� s�• + e � � �.6atl5f ��3��a�,'�B® ��a�� _ .— (�' .u-r,ISL•aluv I° ° � � �� '.�^^I .MEN 1 1 • + � � -{ -Er`z ®�F33 ®f�� I'M . pm t v ' �' . a tt 16 ! Resolution No. 01-053 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE DIAGRAM FOR GRIDLEY-BIGGS FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL AND A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT MODIFYING THE GRIDLEY URBAN RESERVE POLICIES WHEREAS, The Butte County Board of Supervisors, a public entity, through an appropriate application, initiated an amendment to the Gridley-Biggs Land Use Map from Medium Density Residential and Low Density Residential to Agricultural Residential for that property identified on Exhibit A-1 attached hereto, and a text amendment to the Gridley Urban Reserve Policies, Exhibit A-2; and WHEREAS, the proposed General Plan Amendment has been studied and reviewed by the Butte County Planning Commission and a public hearing held pursuant to law, at which time all interested persons were heard; and WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors has reviewed and considered the contents of the Environmental Impact Report (Exhibit A-3) prepared on the amendment pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors has held hearings on the General Plan Amendments at which all interested parties were heard; and WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors finds the proposed amendments comply with all elements of the Butte County General Plan and comprise an overall internally consistent whole, specifically: 1. The amendments comply with the policies of the Butte County General Plan. 2. The amendments provide for compatible development with existing land uses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: 1. The General Plan Amendment to the Gridley-Biggs Land Use Map changing the depicted area from Medium Density Residential and Low Density Residential to Agricultural Residential, as shown on the attached Exhibit A-1, and a text amendment to the Gridley Urban Reserve Policies section of the Land Use Element of the General Plan, as set forth on attached Exhibit A-2, are hereby adopted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to Government Code Section 65359 the General Plan shall be endorsed to show that the above amendments have been approved and adopted by this Board. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Butte County Board of Supervisors on this 22nd i i day of May, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Beeler, Dolan, Houx, Yamaguchi and Chair Josiassen NOES: None ABSENT: None NOT VOTING: None CURT OSIASSEN, CHAIRMAN Co�.nty Board of Supervisors ATTEST: John S. Blacklock, Chief Administrative Officer and Clerk of the Board By: EXHIBIT A-2 Gridley-Biggs Area Land Use Plan Situated on and surrounded by agricultural soil resources which provide no alternative to the planned conversion of agricultural lands to accommodate future urbardrural development, the Gridley-Biggs Area Land Use Plan provides for a relatively large amount of land designated Low, medium, and High Density Residential and Agricultural Residential- These areas are located adjacent to the City of Gridley. Currently devoted to a mixture of agricultural and rural residential uses, these areas are designated for future urban expansion. To . preserve these residential density options, for the time frame of the City of Gridley's General Plan (2020), and to coordinate the County's policies with those of the City of Gridley, the area of the Gridley-Biggs Plan within the adopted sphere of the City of Gridley should be an "Urban Reserve." To achieve these ends in a manner consistent with the Land Use Element's policies regarding Orderly Development (1.7) and the Housing Element's policy regarding adequate facilities and services (111-2 (d), 2 (h)), the policies below are applicable to this portion of the Gridley-Biggs Area Land Use Plan. ❑ The County's land use policy, zoning and subdivision shall be coordinated with the City of Gridley; and ❑ The Urban Reserve (UR) policy shall be applied to ensure orderly premature growth and extension of urban services does not occur outside the City boundaries. Only until such time as necessary urban services are provided to the parcel targeted for development shall the maximum density/intensity of the ultimate land use designation be applied. Prior to urban services being provided, the minimum parcel size for residential uses within the UR area shall be 5 acres; the permitted uses shall only include those allowed in the AR land use designation; ❑ Properties planned for industrial or commercial development shall be managed as an "urban reserve:, permitting industrial or commercial uses on parcels of not less than 10 acres until such time as they are needed for development and adequate services are available; ❑ The following shall apply to General Plan amendment, rezoning , or subdivision within the UR area. Plans for necessary urban services (i.e. sewerage, water, circulation/roads, storm water management, etc.) shall be completed and required finances shall be secured concurrent with or prior to any proposal that ultimately involves the creation of parcels of less than 5 acres for residential use or 10 acres for commercial/industrial use. To ensure long term efficiency in delivering services, these plans shall be coordinated with the City Public Facilities/Infrastructure plans; ❑ Any residential lot which is now less than 5 acres or commercial or industrial lot less than 10 acres which was legally created, pre-existing, and nonconforming may be developed according to its zoning and the provisions of Butte County Code 24-35; and ❑ Development standards compatible with the City of Gridley shall be utilized for urban development projects within the city's established sphere of influence. BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA REPORT - MAY $, 2001 Applicant: Butte County Board of Supervisors APN: Various File#: GPA/RZ 01-02 Location: In and around the Sphere of Request: General Plan Amendment changing Influence of the City of Gridley land use designations on the Gridley Biggs Area Plan Map, as Parcel Size: Various well as amendments to the Gridley Urban Reserve Map and policies in Zone date: Various the Land Use Element. Associated rezones are recommended to bring Attachments: zoning into conformity with the A. Planning Commission Report, March 8, land use designations 2001/minutes B. Recommended .General Plan and zoning G.P.: Low Density Residential, Medium designations Density Residential, Agricultural C. Proposed Ordinance Residential D. Proposed Resolution Zoning: SR, SR-1, A-5, I. BACKGROUND On June 12,2000,the Board of Supervisors initiated a General Plan Amendment and rezone for lands in and around the Gridley's Sphere of Influence (SOI) to reflect changes that LAFCo made to this sphere in April 2000. The amendment involves changes to the Land Use Element including the Urban Reserve policies and rezoning of applicable lands to implement these changes and address related issues. The March 8, 2001, Planning Commission report covered the issues of the proposed General Plan amendments and zoning changes in detail. This report is included as Attachment "A." The Board also received an extensive report on these issues at their June 12, 2000, meeting. Because the Commission recommends that the Board accept and take the actions presented in their staff report, without change, a detailed analysis is not presented in this report. H. CEQA ISSUES An initial study was prepared for this project and no significant impacts were identified.The actions proposed by this project are to bring the zoning and/or General Plan into consistency with the Urban Reserve policy and reduce zoning,densities from a 1-acre minimum or less, to a 5-acre minimum. This 1 i I reduction in density will therefore reduce potential impacts when these lands are actually developed. The impacts associated with the change in the SOI were addressed in an Environmental Impact Report prepared and adopted by LAFCo for the SOI amendment. III. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION A. Adopt a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts, with the following findings: 1. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, that said study did not identify significant environmental effects, and that a Negative Declaration is proposed. 2. Find that the Board of Supervisors has considered the proposed Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. 3. Find,on the basis of the whole record before the Board of Supervisors,including the Initial Study and any comments received,that there is no substantial evidence that the Rezone and General Plan Amendment for Butte County Board of Supervisors, Planning Division File No. GPA/RZ 01-02 will have a significant effect on the environment. 4. Find that the proposed Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. 5. Adopt the Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts. B. Adopt a "de minimus" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The project site is not known to contain any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5. is not required. C. Adopt a resolution amending the Butte County General Plan as follows with the included findings: 1 Land Use Man 1. Change the land use designations on the Gridley/Biggs Land Use Map from Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential to Agricultural Residential for the lands located on the south and east side of Gridley,outside the SOI, shown as areas Oand O in Attachment"F'of the March 8,2001,Planning Commission Report. The proposed change is supported by the following findings: a. Based on the analysis in the City of Gridley's General Plan,the subject land will not 2 be needed for urban development in the next 20 years. b. The subject land meets the Agricultural Residential site designation criteria in the Butte County Land Use Element on page LUE 51. C. The Agricultural Residential designation will act as a buffer between urban uses and intensive agricultural use consistent with Policy 2.Lf. of the Land Use Element. Urban Reserve Policy and Map 2. Amend the Gridley Urban Reserve policy as provided in Attachment "I" of the March 8, 2001 Planning Commission Report. 3. Amend Figure LU-4 of the Land Use Element showing the Gridley Urban Reserve area to reflect the amendments made to the SOI adopted by LAFCo on April 6,2000, as shown in Attachment "H" of the March 8, 2001,Planning Commission Report. These amendments are supported by the following findings: a. The new Urban Reserve Boundary,including the 300-foot buffer along the interface of the new SOI boundary on the north side of Gridley, is consistent with the Butte County General Plan because it implements the following General Plan policies and programs: LUE 1.2.a. Plan for future development of all incorporated and unincorporated areas with county boundaries. LUE 1.2.b. Consult with incorporated cities and neighboring counties in the development of planning proposals for areas of mutual concern. LUE 1.7.a. Encourage annexation to existing cities and existing districts. LUE 1.7.b. Promote the full utilization of sites served by existing public facilities. LUE 1.7.c. Encourage development in and around existing communities with public facilities. LUE 2.Lf. Allow rural residential development as a buffer between urban development and intensive crop land. AE 1.6 Work with LAFCo to create and maintain a consistent approach to the conservation of agricultural land through the designation of reasonable and logical Sphere of Influence boundaries. Support future annexations and Sphere of Influence amendments only when in compliance with the Agricultural Element and LAFCo policies and procedures. It is not the intent of this.Element to preclude cities from expansion. 3 AE 1.8 A planning area for the cities of Gridley and Biggs, which is beyond the existing Spheres of Influence should be defined by each city to reflect each city's area of interest. General plan amendments, Spheres of Influence modifications, and finally, annexation of those areas of interest is the legally required process. Upon annexation of the areas of interest, the city general plan and zoning will apply. Until that time, the County General Plan and zoning will apply. The County will participate in'a cooperative manner in this process as requested by the cities and as County resources permit. Until annexed,the area will be designated by the County as productive agricultural land, and also because retention in larger tracts will be most beneficial to the cities if the land is eventually developed. AE 2.2 Encourage urban infill development within city limits and within existing unincorporated communities where development can more easily and readily be served by public infrastructure facilities. AE 2.5 Encourage urban development to the LAFCo adopted Spheres of Influence. Program AE 2.6 Utilize the LAFCo adopted Spheres of Influence for the cities and the identified unincorporated community cores as areas for urban and/or more intensive development. Restrict urban and intensive development to those areas outside agriculture and other low-intensity uses. D. Adopt an ordinance rezoning areas in and around the Gridley's SOI as follows with the included findings-. 1. Rezone approximately 228 acres from SR-1 to SR-5, shown as areas O and O in Attachment"F"of the March 8, 2001,Planning Commission Report. This is supported by the following findings: a. The SR-5 zone is listed as a consistent zoning designation in the Butte County General Plan for the Agricultural Residential land use designation. b. The physical characteristics of the area will support development at a density of 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres.. 2. Rezone approximately 49 acres located on the east side of Gridley from SR-1 to SR-5, shown as area® in Attachment "F"of the March 8, 2001, Planning Commission Report, with.the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's Medium Density Residential or the City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent 4 with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed upon this property until municipal services are available for more intense development. 3. Rezone approximately 35 acres from SR-1 to SR-5, shown as area O in Attachment "F" of the March 8, 2001, Planning Commission Report, with the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's and City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed on this property until municipal services are available to allow more intense development. 4. Rezone approximately 30 acres from SR to SR-5, located on the northwest side of the Gridley, shown as area© in Attachment "F" of the March 8, 2001 Planning Commission Report, with the following finding: a. The proposed SR-5 zone, while not directly reflecting the County's Medium Density Residential or the City's Low Density Residential land use designations, is consistent with the County's Urban Reserve General Plan overlay and more accurately reflects the limitations placed on this property until municipal-services are available to allow more intense development. i 5 I RESOLUTION NO. 28 1999/00 RESOLUTION OF THE BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING A SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF GRIDLEY RESOLVED,by the Butte Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Butte, State of California,that WHEREAS, a proposal for an amendment to the City of Gridley's Sphere of Influence was heretofore requested by the City of Gridley and accepted by the Executive Officer of this Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Title 5, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Gridley identified a need to amend the Sphere of Influence to accommodate the anticipated growth of the community projected in the City of Gridley General Plan adopted June 1999; and WHEREAS,the Executive Officer,pursuant to Government Code Section 56427,set March 2, 2000 as the hearing date on this proposal and gave the required notice of public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Executive Officer,pursuant to Government Code Section 56428,has reviewed this proposal and prepared a report, including her recommendations thereon, and has furnished a copy of this report to each person entitled to a copy; and WHEREAS,this Commission called for and held a public hearing on the proposal on March 2, 2000,and at the hearing this Commission-heard and received all oral and written protests,objections and evidence which were made,presented or filed,and all persons present were given an opportunity to hear and be heard with respect to this proposal and the report of the Executive Officer; and WHEREAS,the March 2,2000 public hearing was continued, closed,to April 6, 2000; and WHEREAS, this Commission considered the factors determined by the Commission to be relevant to this proposal, including, but not limited to, factors specified in Government Code Section 56425 and 56841; and NOW,THEREFORE,the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Butte DOES HEREBY RESOLVE,DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: Section 1. Environmental Findings A. The Commission has reviewed and considered the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Gridley Sphere of Influence Amendment, consisting of the following: 1.1 RESOLUTION NO. 28 1999/00 (1) The Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared by the City of Gridley as Lead Agency. i (2) Comments and recommendations received by the City of Gridley on the Draft Environmental Impact Report either verbatim or in summary. (3) A list of persons, organizations and public agencies commenting on the Draft Environmental Impact Report. (4) The responses of the Lead Agency to significant environmental points raised both during and after the review and consultation process. (5) Comments and recommendations received by LAFCo on the Final Environmental Impact Report either verbatim or in sumir_ary and LAFCo staff responses thereto. (6) Mitigation Measures added by LAFCo. B. The Commission certifies that it has held a duly noticed public hearing and heard testimony and received written comments from affected agencies at noticed public hearings and has responded to those comments. C. The Commission confirms the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Sphere of Influence Amendment and finds that in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15090, the Final Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Sphere of Influence Amendment has been completed in compliance with CEQA and was presented to the Commission and the Commission reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report and comments on the Final Environmental Impact Report prior to approving the project. D. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15090, the Final Environmental Impact Report reflects the Lead Agency's independent judgment and analysis. E. The implementation of the proposed Sphere of Influence Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment in certain respects identified in Sections 3.1 (Land Use, Population and Housing), 3.2 (Geologic Resources), 3.7 (Public Services and Utilities), 3.9(Biological Resources)and 5.4(Effects Found Not to Be Significant)of the Final Environmental Impact Report. F. With respect to the significant effects detailed in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Sphere of Influence Amendment and found to be relevant to the Commission's action and based on the information set forth in the Final Environmental Impact Report, the Commission finds and determines that: 9 RESOLUTION NO. 28 1999/00 (1) Measures have been required in or incorporated into the proj ect to mitigate conversion of approximately 268 acres of prime agricultural land to nonagricultural uses during the 2000-2020 planning period,identified in Sections 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 of the Final Environmental Impact Report. However, these mitigation measures cannot reduce the impacts to a level that is less than significant. A certain level of mitigation will be provided by the measures identified in Section 2 and 3 of this report. There are no feasible mitigation measures or project alternatives which will reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. (2) Measures have been required in or incorporated into the project which will mitigate impacts resulting from the shift in location of land use conflicts between urban and agricultural land uses at the urban/agricultural interface, identified in Sections 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 of the Final Environmental Impact Report,to a level that is less than significant. (3) Measures have been required in or incorporated into the project which will mitigate impacts resulting from the lack of logical and orderly boundaries due to approval of the proposed Sphere of Influence Amendment,identified in Sections 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 of the Final.Environmental Impact Report, to a level that is less than significant. (4) Measures have been required in or incorporated into the project which will mitigate impacts of increases in downstream flows due to development in accordance with the General Plan Amendments,identified in Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 of the Final Environmental Impact Report, to a level that is less than significant. (5) Measures have been required in or incorporated into the project which will mitigate adverse impacts on riparian habitats,agricultural operations and surface water quality due to increased discharge into surface waters resulting from development in accordance with the General Plan Amendments, identified in Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 of the Final Environmental Impact Report,to a level that is less than significant. (6) Measures have been required in or incorporated into the project to mitigate reduction in roadway and intersection service levels in the City and proposed Sphere of Influence, identified in Sections 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 of the Final Environmental Impact Report,to a level that is less than significant. (7) Measures have been required in or incorporated into the project which will mitigate impacts related to public safety hazards resulting from increased X13 RESOLUTION NO. 281999/00 residential development in proximity to irrigation and drainage canals,identified in Sections 3.6.2 and 3.6.3 of the Final Environmental Impact Report, to a level that is less than significant, and are identified in Section 2 of this report. (8) Measures have been required in or incorporated into the project which will mitigate adverse impacts on operations of irrigation districts due to conversion of irrigated agricultural uses within the proposed Sphere of Influence to urban uses, identified in Sections 3.7.2 and 3.7.3 of the Final Environmental Impact Report, to a level that is less than significant, and are as identified in Section 2 of this report. G. All significant environmental effects identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Sphere of Influence Amendment that can be feasibly mitigated have been reduced to an acceptable level in that: (1) All significant environmental effects that can feasibly be avoided have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant as determined and as set forth in these findings and the Final Environmental Impact Report. (2) A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been identified and adopted by the City of Gridley which will monitor and ensure that the mitigation measures identified will be instituted as described in the Final Environmental Impact Report. H. Statement of Overriding Considerations: Pursuant to Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines,the Commission finds that the economic and social benefits of the proposed project documented in the Final Environmental Impact Report and the Sphere of Influence Plan, such as expanding the housing opportunities and economic growth opportunities in the City of Gridley, outweigh the adverse impacts of the conversion of prime agricultural land,an impact which cannot be eliminated or reduced to a level that is less than significant and which is unavoidable as the City grows. Section 2. Findings for Adoption of the Sphere of Influence Amendment A. The Commission has considered the factors determined by the Commission to be relevant to this proposal, including, but not limited to, Sphere of Influence and General Plan consistency, and other factors specified in Government Code Sections 56425 and 56428 and as described in the staff report dated February 24, 2000 for the meeting of March 2, 2000 in that: 11 RESOLUTION NO. 28 1999/00 (1) The Commission has considered the present and planned land uses in the area, including agricultural and open space lands as described in the Butte County General Plan Land Use Element and Agricultural Element and the City of Gridley General Plan Land Use Element. (2) The Commission has considered the present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area as described in the City of Gridley Master Services Element and the City of Gridley General Plan Public Facilities Element, Circulation Element, Open Space Element and Housing Element. (3) The Commission has considered the present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services which the agency provides or is authorized to provide as described in the City of Gridley Master Services Element and the City of Gridley General Plan Public Facilities Element, Circulation Element, and Open Space Element. (4) The Commission has considered the existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area as described in the Butte County General Plan Agricultural Element and received as testimony in public hearings. (5) The Commission has considered the conversion of prime agricultural lands as constituent of the Final Environmental Impact Report and through the adoption of Overriding Considerations Findings in Section 1 of this report. B. The amended Sphere of Influence shall include approximately 268 acres representing five (5) parcels identified-on LAFCo Exhibit "I", as amended to include the 15 acre Banes property. C. The amended Sphere of Influence will remove approximately 167 acres from the existing Sphere of Influence representing forty-nine(49)parcels identified on LAFCo Exhibit"1". Section 3. Terms and Conditions adopted by LAFCo Pursuant to its authority under Part 2,Chapter 4 and Part 3,Chapter 5 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Butte LAFCo incorporates the following terms and conditions into the Sphere Plan for the City of Gridley and the Final Environmental Impact Report: A. The approximately 167 acres of land in the existing Sphere of Influence in the southeast area designated as the Urban Reserve shall be removed immediately and be requested to be rezoned by the County to SR-5 (Suburban Residential-5 acre minimum parcels) to preserve the rural residential character of the area. L-15-1 RESOLUTION NO. 28 1999/00. B. The City of Gridley should provide for the annexation and extension of sewer services to Hollis Lane residential parcels in conjunction with the extension of sewer service to other vacant lands. The Commission should coordinate the exploration of developing a funding source for this project in cooperation with the County,the City and local residents. The Commission may require annexation of all or a portion of these properties as a condition of further contiguous annexations. C. The City of Gridley, through conditions of future project approvals, shall provide an agricultural buffer along the unincorporated boundary of the amended Sphere of Influence. The agricultural buffer shall be initially established with a 300-foot width as prescribed in the Agricultural Element. Future adjustments are possible at the time of parcel annexation in accordance with prescribed standards set by the Agricultural Commissioner and Agricultural Element policies of the Butte County General Plan. The buffer shall be flexible in location, but will always be present at the boundary of the interface with the unincorporated agriculturally zoned lands and the Sphere of Influence. D. Two parcels totaling approximately 58 acres,identified on LAFCo Exhibit"1", located in the northeast area of the proposed Sphere of Influence and identified on the map are designated by the City of Gridley for general commercial uses. This area shall be re- designated for agricultural-industrial uses by the City of Gridley to reduce the potential for incompatibility with agricultural operations and provide additional lands for agriculturally related processing facilities. The Commission will deny any future annexation of these parcels if they are proposed for other than agricultural/industrial uses, unless the Commission approves an alternative means of reducing potential incompatibilities between agricultural uses and the proposed development of these parcels. E. All open surface water transport facilities shall be provided a minimum 50 foot access and maintenance easement along the affected facilities measured from the centerline of the affected facility. Easements may be reduced with the approval of the affected operator. F. All open surface water transport facilities shall be either under-grounded or fenced, in accordance with standards previously adopted by the Commission for the protection of the affected facilities. The City shall establish a funding mechanism to provide for the ongoing maintenance of access restricting structures. G. The City shall provide a plan for the mitigation of peak stormwater flows resulting from new development within the Sphere of Influence based on a 100-year storm event,unless compelling arguments can be proven by affected district engineers that a greater standard is necessary for the health,safety and welfare of area residents. The detention basin shall discharge the post development run-off at a rate equal to or less than .16 RESOLUTION NO. 281999/00 significant. The drainage plan shall be prepared and submitted to the affected district 45 days in advance of an annexation request being made to LAFCo. H. All Commission fees must be paid in full prior to filing the Certificate of Completion. 1. The Commission has accepted and affirmed the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Sphere of Influence amendment as a general policy level action intended to provide a broad discussion of growth boundaries and potential impacts. The City should not expect to rely on the Sphere of Influence Final Environmental Impact Report to support or mitigate all project specific impacts identified during the annexation process. The Commission will conduct additional environmental review for discussions of drainage impacts,circulatiorn/traffic impacts, and agricultural operations impacts at the time an annexation application is submitted with specific project descriptions. Section 4. The Executive Officer is bereby authorized and directed to mail certified copies of this Resolution in the manner and as provided in Section 56853 of the Government Code. PASSED AND ADOPTED by this Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Butte,on the 6th day of April 2000 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Beeler,Cook,Dolan,Evans,Hall,Keene and Chair Leverenz NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINS: None CARL LEVEREN7,Chair .butte Local Agency Formation Commission F E I'VIEl-i, 21 3LTTE CQUINTY ' .::1NNTNG DTVTgIO-L\. J199 IN2tWH3`v III ■' � j 0 MEN - r Jul, + Sphere Muence �MewLegend -■_ y!!!!!ll�,Itl,al �ryrlr. ry�=—._!=�^� __euousn��i J�► a..e ERIC, P i-_- ,y,,. �6➢u5 nsun GR'n/g i�s�Jl ■■�.. JI�r �TWE j riu �,�� F.a..♦ i i��R.r•l►I.�ylIIMMM� Sphere�. / of influence'' tttt�.�■ `''_ = _�`ry`': �'+��.�'�•'.= \�9r � ��1�1tylGllfil:7� �� it(R.'h1+.r ��i� i�,•� ��l ter.�illSil.11l!I �� F3 y�: . Area \R t_� -d RISK F/6' �� Removed � I.� �slFii:isri, �nL■e\ �� iy r '.�° _—. I' El w i1,16�iEIi1!iiIi_d tri, �( �6 �`I��11 �'L.`I�`•r `aNOWL-111!�i� 19 /gili� , .i t• �511. i2. r.1 %�-� � _ �f + -+ /..�� • :� ., IS it 7_/i 1 •_ 1� �� sps �t c � v/ ■ �/.V�1��/��si. .'LtG -7N M' :�� , '� CilCllltil� �.:' � Area Added to Sol IN�.L€-{�=-,-� �t _: -,�_�1:.� �-. f, �ti ��all �a 50-20 U Gri 1 .� "s��I.R��••`:tu..•otuR10—.`eut9.a109 r■iil•:1.•:S•t•s.: - tt. • a lima V /IIIIR itli0y lR ! . ,/,l �cl.� "" � �Ir�il� Iilt_i. JIIIII PrAw ' rel �I �I a■� _■1111��(i♦11�1 �I■� �i r��n II�IIIr" ■111■0ut��l� , l LSl'1J1�'/ t�t„1 I�■11 �I.YR.i.��..■ .' ulr �!w� r� «�� ,LI�I�L�H��,L,L� .......... _ r • , r � J� I I ATTACHMENT "C" II �'';t:?�?c:!i<•>,.i`.''{ny:~S•tv'S �,d �- ni19/G/R. �y a1R illitiocomile 3 —�"F.YS16�1lI Iil�i /, = ;?�_, '��llYl- Mme" yJ'_ O iia�- • �- ,_,�y=;.�..1��.�� • . .•Ilill Ailrla- '■ n. _r s/ir. w•p./ �1D 9\t! 1 •p�I4 -r •j • - �r yyl!�Y1� r . e.. `:I® rile •�;: • R�\• ��n•� � _-■I' �`:::•`.::;:l i':9wc;2':': �tir_ -!" �� Ei. : Y\��i 1♦��•ui: y�i\, IMMUNE - R � • • • - - - `�::u:i:i::•`::.?.at:::E:i-�I: �� iYS Irk�.S ,�r.�•L�6 -,�� ., �+� es��'/l6il�lfi9idl, � ,. I�_ yils I`o t••�l�ri•� E+� � ' �l i �/+ Irr Ise - .�-•I_�Flo yl \��y � ��"4 '\ � FJllr� ■ \ • • • • • a a r•IEiI I�t�IF.li: 1�_ fisi►.• �. \u • �i _ r Yt:x •.11 +.'r ,�j 1711 tnaifirin '11 UI+��5�11 i•I i� � ►� 6•'. '■ 9l�1911� 2,i?:/,�' � • J 1.: ,�■E�i��+FR111�G1 i•m�i�: nI'y�i!r.:e�!.i�7•• �•�\� ��-` i�®��I��•ir�or`.`i Yv '�■1'11�_ _ �II� �J 1r � �� a��•• �. y.ui� !JR • �� 1 :Vii+ ";r.�lil!Qi� 11-1�G/iEG 11/1/ ��\'��1 ri••' �� s�■1H�I :: A199 INJIAIHJVIIV o�vTTFo 0 0 0 0 0 0 .:_. .. 0 c�U N'�y CURT JOSIASSEN SUPERVISOR, FOURTH DISTRICT P.O.Box 385 Richvale,CA 95974 (530)8824447 FAX(530)882-4281 E-Mail—cjosiassen@buttecounty.net MEMO DATE: February 11, 2000 TO: John Blacklock, Chief Administrative Officer Tom Parilo, Director of Development Services FROM: Curt Josiass Tf SUBJECT: Rezone of approximately 167 acres in southeast Gridley area currently located within the Gridley Urban Reserve. The City of Gridley is currently in the process of requesting the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) to approve the expansion of the City's'Sphere of Influence. The anticipated approval date is March 2, 2000. As a result of numerous.meetings coordinated by LAFCo staff involving my office, the Butte County Farm Bureau, the City of Gridley, and other affected districts, a compromise Sphere plan has been recommended. One aspect of the plan calls for the removal of approximately 167 acres located in the southeast area of the existing Sphere of Influence. This area is presently zoned SR-1 and is located in the Gridley Urban Reserve which establishes a 5 acre minimum parcel size until urban services can be provided. As this area is not projected to have urban services extended to it within the 20 year Sphere plan, LAFCo is requesting that it be removed from the Sphere of Influence. It is my understanding that the Urban Reserve designation.is linked to the Sphere of Influence. As the Sphere of Influence is anticipated to be modified, this 167 acre area may no longer be consistent with the Urban Reserve language currently adopted in the Land Use Element. LAFCo is requesting that the County initiate a rezone in this area to SR-5 to preserve the area for future development absent the Urban Reserve protection. As this project is of great importance to the effective planning within the 4`" District, I am requesting that the Development Services Department promptly initiate a review of the LAFCo request and take the necessary steps to bring this matter to the Board of Supervisors for action. If there are any questions concerning this request, please contact my office or Paula Leasure or Stephen Lucas of the LAFCo staff for assistance. cc: Paula Leasure, LAFCo Stephen Lucas, LAFCo Frank Cook, Mayor, City of Gridley 20 «�� ,Li��IAIH��Z.L`� I MISS hot Q� � ,�1I_�■�_� _ :tel/=/..1.:�■...� 700 � �� ■ .■ .= � �_a - - -- � IOoQ tt�t �%� :� .IC =C =� •� \, p ,0 Ilunuum ■� SH _—_ :S /Ili �� .0 -s.•. ■'ll::.�� ,i �s �� • •�••�•■ 1111111 .111111 p.. .. c■ n■ ri/ • •. � �• �� ,:llitllltif111 IfUrs 1':d .. Ire ita. � s;ll L■�\,\\ ��1 •' v �'•d t{ Q�Q� ... �. . ■ 5■.. !.� � r� � ,�♦ '��Ilfl■ .■��c �� .liliii' Smalli ii ■ = {{■{I- 1111 O.� -1.-1 1 •� r�,•,,+ {/ �� •1 • l�' Q111 ,J ..■ � int - I.= 11= �/;. 1.= _- ,; .:. � \X111..11,1:_�: '■�� --.■� ■ sou - r� _ �.T. ��f;• �':,� ,+■=�.ol ■Its■ .3 EE PEA ME ■ ::/n.:n mii iiiiiii: — ■ l N 1� �.IrrAj �g Tl� _ -�--- tllf� ./. •/.,/,...uluu.,�i�'�i� _� tcox' � Mit ■71f■ mm�o 111 _ � i ..HIMM �f ■�tu■� t..11f■� n ■ :�i■�i� ••■ , eaaaa�t�l i f. J 66A99 , NANH3VIIV «�� ,L�I�Ii�IH��ss� CITY OF GRIDLEY PLANNING DEPARTMENT JO SHERMAN,PLANNING DIRECTOR Phone(530)846-3631 FAX(530)846-3229 May 1, 2400 FAX TRANSMITTAL TO: NUMBER OF PAGES(including this page): I Torn Parillo 538-7785 SUBJECT: Report on Gridley Sphere of Influence Mr. Meleka's report is very thorough. I'm pleased that the staff recommendation favors rezoning of the area to a 5-acre minimum designation. My only concern is the statement that the Urban Reserve policy no longer applies to the area removed from Gridley's SOI. The owner of a 6-acre lot within the Highway 99 Bypass corridor has been watching the progress of Gridley's Sphere in:hopes of splitting his lot into one-acre pieces. What will your department do if you receive an application prior to completion of a rezoning? Would you want to recommend that the Planning Commission immediately adopt a resolution of intent to rezone, or place a moratorium on development within the area under study, or take some other action to freeze splits until the issue is resolved? Our new SOI becomes effective May 6, if no appeals are filed prior to that date_ Thanks for allowing me to review the report, and for making yourself available for our meeting on Friday. r F 23 «x„ iu��Ha�si� H I : ■ 7M WN W IBM .■ !K6_S091RZaaIQ��Q ��?��= _- -_ e_nnuuu� :au a ■--_ _Is D \-`\��': '�lil■■ 11-7 .� == — �-=Q04Q>1>r, .. y• • o.. a� � .• ■ .1111{_■ JIIIII i � �i :i �: "'■i. •�i •`'1:"�, ,•i^:: ,;11111111 III / 1 i i 1.�. .■ au .Ilw ,. ��• • • i 111■ ' -■ � ,■.�. .- •�� ■'. a `�`�� ``j� \11: ' ■■■ ili :: �■ 11. 111 . � .. • ' ■■: :I. 'P_' ■'' ♦ 1• „�� , �`�� III_ ■1111� 1111 u�. .,. nil, Li,•,�\\�:,. . �, , , i,i I;-.i '', ='�I` 1:,:L�� -.:. �.,�,I r .�I_I_II;_a_'._ . s •.. �I� II :��:,■.��,II 11■,11111■■ Ili! n� °-1 ``'� •• � • �'■�':=� I �,■■� �.''�.�� ■ �� •-- - -—■;11�11'�II■ C � �� moi_ .; .:, ; \,111..1111.__F � ' CM — — —1 =_��s��ri _ �__�=u_ _i _X11:��t��11�` ■� �_ 1■1111 _— :IIIIII� 1 ■' d�ll■■� ■6��IIICi ■ ■ X0 :1111_ �� " � _ ■ ■uuw uuuu■.muni■■I�It�tlll�' �� 111 , = . L�� 1u111ulr0000e I��II- lli9�s C �I �,,�11� � � ■anon ■'CIII: 00!01 1 , ` ` V �. �• 1 uuuu■®'ggg ■ Mimi —■1111 ■.1 � •��I \�� stRlb _ • ■ ■�I■iii�itl�i■ii■1,.11 �� mel YYk9990 I�■■'�IIIII■ 111.■n . ■, 1 ■ \1 IISSKRRRRQ00091 I '' .IGridley , ... _ 11 ■ «I�� ZI�I�L�H��,LZ� Gridley-Biggs Area Land Use Plan Situated on and surrounded by agricultural soil resources which provide no alternative to the planned conversion of agricultural lands to accommodate future urban/rural development, the Gridley-Biggs Area Land Use Plan provides for a relatively large amount of land designated Low, medium, and High Density Residential and Agricultural Residential. These areas are located adjacent to the City of Gridley. Currently devoted to a mixture of agricultural and rural residential uses, these areas are designated for future urban expansion. To preserve these residential density options, for the time frame of the plan 2666)City of Gridley's General Plan 2020, and to coordinate the County's policies with those of the City of Gridley, the area of the Gridley-Biggs Plan within the adopted sphere of the City of Gridley should be an "Urban Reserve." To achieve these ends in a manner consistent with the Land Use Element's policies regarding Orderly Development (1.7) and the Housing Element's policy regarding adequate facilities and services (III-2 (d), 2 (h)), the policies below are applicable to this portion of the Gridley-Biggs Area Land Use Plan. ❑ The County's land use policy, zoning and subdivision shall be coordinated with the City of Gridley;and 0 The urban residential designations adjacent to the efty of 6ridley's cur,ent boundat ies shali be managed as an"Urban Reserve", pemiftfing mral residential development mid uses on parcels of not less thati fiv ac,es until such time as they are needed fbi de velopment and adequat available to servC. these areas; and ❑ lThe_Urban_Reserve_(IJR policy shall be applied to ensure orderlypremature_growth andextensiori o Urban-services does not occur outside the City boundaries. Only until such time as necessary urban services.are provided to theparcel'targeted for development shall the maximum density/intensity of the, ultimate land use designation be applied. Prior to urban services being provided, the minimum parcel', size for residential uses within the UR area shall be 5_acres. the_permitted uses shall only include_ those, allowed.in the AR land_use designation or a more restrictive one; ❑ Properties planned for industrial or commercial development shall be managed as an "urban reserve:, permitting industrial or commercial uses on parcels of not less than 10 acres until such time as they are needed for development and adequate.services are available;and 11 The following shall apply to General Plan amendment, rezoning, or subdivision within the UR area. Flans for necessary urban services i.e. sewerage, water, circulation/roads storm water management, etc. shall be completed,and required_finances shall be,secured concurrent with prior to any ro os that ultimately involves the creation of parcels of less than 5 acres for residential use or 10 acres fob commercial/industrial use. To ensure long term efficiency in delivering services,_these_plans_shall b_e. coordinated with the_City Public Facilities/Infrastructure plans, Any proposal ffir a 6eneral Plan 2�inendrnent, fbdivision wifich vvould penrAt par eels of less than five acres to be created for msidential or f() acres for cormnercial or industrial use shall coordinated with the platis of the eity of Gridley fbi extension of sewer, water, chettlation, drainage, an means to cont,ol do vvii st,emn flooding, pi ior to or concurrently with the adoption; and ❑ Any residential lot which is now less than 5 acres or commercial or industrial lot less than 10 acres which '25 i was legally created, pre-existing, and nonconforming may be developed according to its zoning and the provisions of Butte County Code 24-35; and. ❑ Development standards compatible with the City of Gridley shall be utilized for urban development projects within the city's.established sphere of influence. i ❑ We area added to the Gridley. Sphere of Influence by LAFCo Resolution 28 1999/00 shall remain in an Orchard and Field Cropland use designation with an A-40 zone to preserve continued agricultural use. Mand is_annexed to the City of Gridley., See Figure L U-4 (Gridley Urban Reserve) I 26 «r„ iu��Ha�ii� Project:GPA/RZ 01-02 COUNTY OF BUTTE INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS I. BACKGROUND: 1. Name of Proponent: Butte County Board of Supervisors 2. Address: 25 County Center Drive, Oroville CA , Phone: (530) 538-7601 3. Name of Proposal, if applicable: 4. Type of Project: General Plan Amendment and Rezone, File GPA/RZ 01-02. 5. Project Description and Location of Parcel(s): General Plan Amendment and Rezone of lands located in and around the Sphere of Influence (SOI) of the City of Gridley. The proposed changes in land use designations and zoning are in response to an amendment to the City's SOI approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission(LAFCo) in April of 2000. The amendment added approximately 253 acres to the City's sphere and removed approximately 171 acres. As a result,existing County zoning and General Plan designations in some areas around Gridley are no longer consistent with the desired growth pattern for the City and surrounding lands. Land Outside the SOI Proposed changes to the County's General Plan and zoning are as follows: a) Remove the "Urban Reserve" designation from all lands taken out of the SOI; b) Apply the "Urban Reserve designation to lands added to the SOI; c) Amend the General Plan and zoning for approximately 136 acres located on the southeast edge of the City sphere from Low Density Residential and Suburban Residential 1-acre minimum to Agricultural Residential and corresponding 5-acre minimum zoning designation,either A-5,SR-5 or AR-5;d)Amend the General Plan for two parcels from Low Density Residential to Agricultural Residential to make them consistent with the current zoning of A-5; and e) Rezone two areas from Suburban Residential 1-acre minimum to Agricultural 5-acre minimum. These actions will bring the zoning and General Plan designations into consistency for lands outside the SOI. Land Inside the SOI The land within the SOI includes areas that require zoning changes to achieve consistency with the General Plan. Three areas in the south and southeast are recommended for a zoning _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 1 127 Project.GPA/RZ 01-02 change from Suburban Residential 1-acre minimum to Suburban Residential 5-acre minimum. Two areas in the northwest are recommended to change from Suburban Residential to Suburban Residential 5-acre minimum Additionally, minor changes are proposed for adoption to the text of the Urban Reserve policy and a new map depicting the Urban Reserve area. The LAFCo adopted an EIR for the SOI amendment. The EIR document addressed all impacts associated with the addition and removal of lands from Gridley's SOI. This document evaluates the impacts of implementing some general Plan and zoning changes in the unincorporated lands around Gridley to be consistent with the change in the SOI. In and around the City of Gridley SOI. 6. Assessor's Parcel Numbers: Various 7. Date Checklist Submitted: 1 8. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None II. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: ® I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment,there will NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environmentand an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a"potentially significant impact" or"potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment,but at least one effect: 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards;and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 2 i Project:GPA/RZ 01-02 sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects:(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards; and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION,including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project,nothing further is required. 11/09/00 Prepared by: Cr ' anders, Senior Planner, AICP Date 11/09/00 Reviewed by: M. Meleka, Principal Planner, MCRP Date III. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. _ Aesthetics _ Agriculture Resources _ Air Quality _ Biological resources _ Cultural Resources _ Geology/Soils _ Hazards/Hazardous Mtrls. _ Hydrology/Water Qualiy _ Land Use/Planning _ Mineral Resources _ Noise _ Population/Housing _ Public Services — Recreation _ Transportation/Traffic _ Utilities/Service Systems _ Mandatory Findings of Significance EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 3 Project:GPA/RZ 0 1-02 involved(e.g.,the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards,(e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to poliutants based on a project-specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. 'Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated"applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant Impact"to a"Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed:Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,"describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 4 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mii:igation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., General Plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold;if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b) Substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 5 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mi:igation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Response: The proposed project will bring zoning and General Pian designations in and around the city of Gridley into conformance with each other. The current zoning designations allow single family residential development. The proposed zoning designations also allow single family residential development, but at a reduced density. No aesthetic impact will occur as a result of this reduced density. Mitigation: None required 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? X _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 6 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? X Res op nse: a. - c. None of the lands affected by this proposal are designated as prime agricultural lands by the Butte County General Plan even though the soils on site would support such a designation. The areas to be rezoned have already been divided into parcels that accommodate viable agricultural activities. The proposed zoning designations will continue to allow agricultural uses. The impacts on agriculture,from adding the area to the City's sphere (to the north), have been addressed in the certified EIR. Mitigation: None required 3. AIR QUALITY Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b) Violate any air quality standard or _ Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division _ 7 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? X d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Response: a. -e. Butte County is located in the central portion of the Northern Sacramento Valley Air Basin and is under the jurisdiction of the Butte County Air Pollution Control District. The County has been classified as being either non-attainment or transitional non-attainmentfor ozone(state andfederal), carbon monoxide(federal), and PMI p (state). However, air quality has improved over the last three years. The Butte County Air Quality Management District (BCAQMD) and Butte County Association of Governments recently submitted a redesignation request to the Environmental Protection Agency to certify Butte County as being in attainment of air quality standards. The proposed changes in the General Plan and zoning will reduce the potential density of the subject areas and, consequently, the potential air quality impacts. _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 8 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Mitigation: None required 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d) Interfere substantially with the _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 9 Lass Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy ordinance? X f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Response: a. California Department of Fish and Game mapping of Areas of Special Biological Importance indicate that none of the affected areas have any rare, endangered or sensitive plant/animal species. However, the Feather River does provide foraging habitat for Bald Eagles and the maps indicate a nesting site may be present near the southwest corner of the project site. b. No riparian habitat exists within the project sites. C. No wetlands exist within the project sites. d. The project areas have already been altered from their native state and converted to either residential or agricultural uses. The habitat value of these lands have already _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 10 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact been lost. e.,f. There is no tree preservation or habitat conservation plan for these areas. Mitigation: None required. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project.- a) roject:a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? X b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? X c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Response:. a. -d No known sites exist in the project area. The area around the city of Gridley is shown as a low sensitivity area for cultural artifacts. Since this project is simply making changes to the General Plan and zoning that inc;-ease the minimum parcel size, no physical changes will occur. The environmental analysis for future land division will _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 11 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact In:orporated Impact Impact address site specific impacts to cultural resources. Mitigation: None Required 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1) Rupture of a known earth- quake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other sub- stantial evidence of a know fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X 2) Strong seismic ground shaking? X 3) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X 4) Landslides? X _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 12 Less.Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating sub- stantial risks to life or property? X e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal or waste water? X Response: a.1. The Seismic Safety Element indicates that al! of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The closest napped Fault-Rupture Zone is the Cleveland Hills Fault line, which is located 7 mi:es to the east. Structures proposed by future projects must meet the UBC requirements for Seismic Zone 3. This proposal will not change the basic land use allowed on these lands but will reduce the potential density by approximately 5-fold. No impacts are anticipated as a result of fault rupture and no seismic-related requirements are necessary. a.2. The intensity of ground shaking at any specific site depends on the characteristics of the earthquake, the distance from the earthquake, and on the local geologic soils _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 13 Less Than S gnificant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact and conditions. At present, there are insufficient data to accurately predict the expected ground motions at various locations in Butte County. Conservatively, the ground motions could be as strong as those observed in Oroville during the 1975 earthquake, a modified Mercalli intensity of VIII. All proposed structures are required by the Uniform Building Code to meet the requirements of Seismic Zone 3. As a result, structural damage will be limited due to the construction requirements a.3. The Butte County Seismic Safety Element's Liquefaction Potential Map indicates that the site has a moderate potential for liquefaction. However, a notation on the map indicates that liquefaction in the area is potentially higher near streams and rivers. All proposed structures are required by the Uniform Building Code to meet the requirements of Seismic Zone 3. As a result, structural damage will be limited due to the construction requirements. a.4. Landslides are not possible in the project areas due to extremely flat terrain. b. The erosion potential in the area is low due to the flat terrain and low rainfall amounts. The reduction in the proposed development density will also limit site disruption. C. Future structures and improvements to the site will not create unstable soil conditions. Engineering requirements of the UBC require certain standards to protect structures and surrounding terrain. No impact is anticipated from instability, landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse. d. Soils in the area have low to moderate expansive characteristics. Foundation design for new homes where expansive soils exist is addressed during buildingpermitplan checking. No impact is anticipated. e. The affected areas generally have good soils for traditional septic tank and leachfield systems. As the project is proposing a reduction in potential development density, no impact is anticipated. _ Butte County Department.of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 14 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Mitigation: None required 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools? X d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 15 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X Response: a. - d.: The proposed zoning and General Plan changes do not allow uses that utilize or generate significant amounts of hazardous wastes or dangerous materials (see project description). The project area does not contain any sites listed on the State's Hazardous Waste and Toxic Site list. e.,f. None of the affected sites are within an airport area of influence. _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 16 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact g. The project area is not subject to an emergency evacuation plan. h. The affected areas are not adjacent to wildlands and are not subject to wildland fire hazards. Surrounding land use are primarily orchards or irrigated pasture. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? X b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including' through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? X d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a _ Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division _ 17 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? X e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 18 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Response: a. Future land divisions will be subject to additional environmental review as a development project. Wastewater discharge requirements, if needed, will be addressed at that time. As this project is reducing densities approximately 5-fold, no significant impacts are anticipated. b. Groundwater is generally plentiful throughout the valley area of the County. Domestic water can be obtained from groundwater sources throughout the project area. The reduction in the potential development density will also reduce the number of potential wells and groundwater consumption in the project area. c. -e. The amount of impervious surfaces resulting from the proposed zoning and General Plan changes will not be significant. The entire area is relatively flat and runoff will not be at high velocities. The resulting erosion potential is low. The proposed residential density will be 1 dwelling unit per 5-acres. At this density, runoff and its potential impacts would be less than that resulting from the higher density that would otherwise be allowed prior to the proposed changes. f. The reduction in potential density will significantly reduce the potential for surface water degradation. Other uses in the affected areas will not change. g. None of the areas affected by this project are within a 100 year flood zone (Flood Insurance Rate Map panel # 06007C1110 and 06007C1125, dated June 8, 1998). i. -j. The city of Gridley is not located near any body of water that could produce a seiche or tsunami. Mud flows would not occur in the region as the valley floor is too flat. Mitigation: None Required _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 19 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the project? a) Physically divide an established community? X b) Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the General Plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X Response: a. - c. The changes being proposed are on the edge of Gridley and will not divide the community. This project will not conflict with any currently adopted plan or policy. In fact, the purpose of this project is to bring the County General Plan and zoning designations into conformity with the City of Gridley's General Plan and SOI. There is no habitat or natural community conservation plan for the Gridley area. Mitigation: None required _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 20 i Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 10. MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local General Plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X Response: There are no significant mineral resources within the project boundary. Mitigation: None Required. 11. NOISE Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local General Plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 21 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or noise levels: X c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Response: a. -d. The noise characteristics of the affected areas-will not change. The land uses will remain the same but the densities will be reduced. This will result in a reduction in the potential for future noise generation. _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 22 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e. -f The project is not located in the vicinity of an airstrip or within an airport land use plan. Mitigation: None required 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure? X b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Response: a. -c. The proposed project reduces housing density in the affected areas. The elimination of the Urban reserve designation will remove the subject land from the area that is considered by the City and Countyfor future urban development. This reduction in growth potential has been compensated for by the expansion of the Gridley SOI on the north side of the city. The sphere amendment shifts the location of potential Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 23 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact housing from one location to another in the Gridley area. This action was approved by LAFCo and an EIR was certified for the project. The project addressed in this initial study simply implements the sphere amendment and carries out changes consistent with this amendment. Mitigation: None Required. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services?. X b) Fire protection? X c) Police Protection? X d) Schools? X e) Parks? X e) Other public services? X _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 24 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Response: a. The reduction in residential density will not result in a need for expanded public services. b. Fire protection services are provided by the Butte County Fire Department. The reduction in residential density will not result in any increased demand for fire protection services. C. Law enforcement is provided by the Butte County Sheriffs Department. Traffic enforcement is provided by the California Highway Patrol in unincorporated areas. No changes in police protection are proposed. The County will collect Sheriff impact fees at time of building permits to offset incremental development impacts. d. Schools in the county will not be affected by the proposed development. The schools will receive revenue on aper-square-foot basisfor all new buildings(Sterling Fees). The impacts to the school districts will also be negligible as any new housing for employees will also be subject to residential school impact fees. The County has determined that Sterling fees, collected at the time of building permit application, will adequately address potential impacts on schools. e. The reduction in potential density will not result in an increased demand for recreation facilities. f The affected areas are already served by adequate public facilities that meet existing demand. A reduction in potential future density will not affect any public service. Mitigation: None Required _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 25 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 14. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Response: The project will have the effect of reducing potential housing densities and, therefore, population. A reduction in the population will have a resulting reduction in the demand for recreation services. No adverse impact on existing recreation facilities is anticipated Mitigation: None Required. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system(i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 26 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated. Impact Impact capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? X b) Exceed, either individually or cumula- tively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X e) Result in inadequate emergency access? X f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g) Conflict with accepted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation(e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? X Response: a. -g. Since the project reduces the potential number of dwelling within the affected areas, the overall traffic generation will be reduced. _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 27 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Mitigation: None required 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 28 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Response: a. -g. The proposed action will reduce the number ofpotential dwellings and, therefore, the generation of runoff, wastewater, and solid waste will be reduced. No significant impact will result from the change in General Plan designation or zoning. Mitigation: None Required 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 29 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively consider- able" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable projects). X c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Response: a. The project as proposed will not affect the habitat of any plant,fish, or wildlife species as the sites to be rezoned have limited habitat value due to conversion to ' agricultural uses. As stated in Section S of this document, no known historical or archaeological resources exist in the project area. b. As no significant impacts were identified, there are no cumulative impacts. There are currently no other projects of significance in the Gridley area. C. The project will not have any adverse effects on humans. The net effect of the proposed changes are simply to reduce residential densities to conform with a newly adopted city sphere. Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 30 Mitigation: None Required _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 31 V. MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: None required _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 32 DATA SHEET a. Project Description 1. Type of Project: General Plan Amendment/Rezone 2. Proposed Density of Development: Not known at this time 3. Amount of Impervious Surface: Generally low, 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres 4. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Public maintained roads serve all areas 5. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic systems 6. Source of Water Supply: Individual wells 7. Proximity of Power Lines: To property .8. Potential for further land divisions and development: Potential exists depending upon existing parcels size B. Environmental Setting 1. Terrain a General Topographic Character: Level valley terrain b. Slopes: Generally 0 - 2 percent. C. Elevation: Approximately 90-feet above sea level d. Limiting Factors: None 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics: Various, generally deep soils well suited for agriculture b. Limiting Factors: None 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII b. Erosion Potential: None C. Landslide Potential: None d. Fire Hazard: Low Hazard Area e. Expansive Soil Potential: Low to moderate 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water: None b. Ground Water: Generally abundant in the area C. Drainage Characteristics: No defined courses, generally sheet flow to west, southwest d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 18-22 inches per year e. Limiting Factors: None 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good 6. Acoustic Quality: Good 7. Air Quality: Good, except when stagnant air conditions persist in the valley. 8. Vegetation: Orchards and irrigated pasture. 9. Wildlife Habitat: Small birds and animals common to valley orchards and grasslands. _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 33 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Low Sensitivity area. 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Agricultu-ral Residential and Low Density Residential 12. Existing Zoning: SR, SR-1, A-5 13. Existing Land Use On-site: Rural residential and mixed agriculture,primarily orchards and irrigated pasture. 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: Some urban uses, rural residential, and agricultural uses. b. Zoning: City of Gridley, A-5, SR-1, M-2 C. General Plan Designation: Agricultural Residential,Low Density Residential,and Industrial d. . Parcel Sizes: 3 - 15 acres predominate 15. Character of Site and Area: Transition area between agriculture and rural residential. 16. Nearest Urban Area: City of Gridley 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: City of Gridley 18. Improvement Standards Urban Area: Yes 19. Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest County(State)Fire Station: Station number 74 approximately I to 2 miles away. b. Water Availability: Fire tankers only. 20. Schools: Gridley Union High School District and Gridley Union Elementary School District. _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 34 1 ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2,Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3,SafetYElement. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Map. Oroville, CA. 11.Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency, State of California, 1983. 12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map,established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1989. 14. USGS Quad Maps. 15. Soil Map, Chico Q925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 16. Soil Survey of Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 17. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. _ Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division _ 35 66M99 ,LNaWH3VIIV I l _p_1,4)1n),',ry eo /yt_!� 5.S.ia N. Fos 7�) Ck _7LA e� 4/V a VIA, i o N tdeAll , - hr.d. A_S V--5- ®r✓_ Lrn_ ��__- -- --- rv- - ,FEB_-2.3 .2001. _ - __ BUTTE COUNTY'IAWNGDIVISION -- - OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA �� f _ � ° - F . � t . f - a � �- � � 4 • � { ;, f _ 4 �� t �- t .. 1 .. � � t l �� ' t _ r � . i � ♦ i �� — .a _ � ;. -., i — — , ' t ', •- , — ,. ; — i .. � t f � � r r � � !' • , - � i� J � � _ � � _ February 26, 2001 Thomas A. Parillo, Director Development Services COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 7 COUNTY DRIVE OROVILLE, CA 95965-3397 Dear Thomas A. Parillo, Director Development Services, We are writing regarding the proposed zoning change of our property. My wife and I have been residents at this address since the late 1970's. We ran a successful honest and tax paying business for 12 years, and gave back much to the city of Gridley. We are retired now and living on a fixed income. After reading both our Y 9 g Y letter and the announcement in the Gridley Herald about proposed changes in our zoning we were alarmed. As retirees we are not in a position to afford all the demands of being annexed into the City of Gridley. We are both older and suffer health problems. My wife only last month suffered a heart attack and was hospitalized in an ICU for a week. We have to face the costs of ongoing health issues. I am soon to be 73 and my wife is 69. Please accept our protest of this proposal. It is not possible for us to meet any additional costs incurred by the installation of sidewalks, curbs, sewers or other unexpected matters. We are satisfied with the way things are now and respectfully ask that the County not accept the proposals we were notified of. Please convey our feelings and wishes to the board. Sincerely, — L Francis A orris SR. Marilyn G. Morris 1586 Bonnell Ave. Gridley, CA 95948 mar,n%aVo FEB 2 8 2001 BUTTE COUNTY PLAN"`NIN1G CIVS0�1 OROVILLE,CAUTO7'°1A L I LL ex, cv 82849 a Pee ecluur-ll VAS, ' Lwucla b lNowe 2W blss2s COUAfh OnL l681!LJa2 SUq M!21J62 j0 ju6 pCSLq' I s2lc p-:g fpo ConujA uoj sccebl fu$ bLobonp MS MGLv riolrtsq off- nusxbactoq u.1s4GL8' AAA SLS '2sj!2Llsq AA!4E1 1pe nn94 jplua2 sLG Liam cE1q wabeclinlI'', sgq!;!cusi map, pA fps !u2;9;!sftau aj 2!CWA3- jV2' cm2' a0&%gLa OL OIPSL blOs8o sc—,Gbj onL bLa;s4r O� jp!2 bLoboasl- it !a uo; boeeipp of. n2 10 w6oj SUA 4o tgcosps co,->f c o}ouao!ua pssilp !aartGa• j qw aoou }o ps S'3suq WA M!te !2 ea, wourp 8n4pneq s ussLl BffscK SL,q MSp poebifspssq lu SU ion ioL s meaK' Ms IlSAB jus CCA or GL!g16A' r,As M9 POtO o1gGL suq antrL pos;tp btoplGwe, .NA Mos ou#A 1sal V? LgLs^sa me sLe, uo; p s boei ou 4o sttaLq 911 Jps gawgL!ga of pG!ua SUUGXGq !UjO SOUlULI A*N1ELG SIULUJsq. P46L uJq Ws suucrtucswsul iu IPO GINIGA H6wlq spore bwboz6q cpeuasa !U orL Guqls)v me sLO Ls,;Leq uom suq I!A!ua cru q }txsq !ucowG y1jGL LGsq!ua polp Aom pouaq cauci px bsAtua pfiewse2 lot 45 Asia' auq acne pvcK wncp jo lUa qX of urns pssu LG2rgGUja sl Fula sggwea 2a2cs jps 1&fb j aj0,a. Me Lsu s anccasaInl MS st.S ML,f!ua wasqua 1ps bwbo2sq :.ouiva cpsuas of or,L bLobFl4k N!A r+nRG 9u I DG%,-pOw52 V Oi.P' D!LGcfO!..DGA61<ObLurii.j ?GLAtma' oLiontrrE' cv aaaee-nai conwv, ol.SlnE DEbVbDlEWi OL DEA'ErObNE01`cISnICE2 contuA oL- eni IIJOW92 Y U- SLI110' D!LGC 01. DGAslobwsuj 2GLA!cGe opvm7 Se, 5004 :. r BEFORE THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Proceeding No. 00-09 Local Agency Formation Commission Project - City of Gridley request to amend REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION the Sphere of Influence. February 24, 2000 for the meeting of March 2, 2000. In the above entitled matter the staff report and the recommendation of the Executive Officer are respectfully submitted as follows: APPLICATION SUBMITTED: September 22, 1999 - Certificate of Filing issued October 6, 1999. APPLICANT: Jo Sherman representing City of Gridley P. O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 PURPOSE: City of Gridley.(hereafter "City") has requested the Commission to consider the expansion of the Gridley Sphere of Influence (SOI) to accommodate the anticipated growth of the community projected in the Gridley General Plan adopted June 1999. The proposed SOI represents a planning area intended to serve the City of Gridley through the year 2020. The Commission will consider the merits of the*proposal and review the impacts of such expansion on City services and affected local agencies and persons and adopt findings and conditions which will be considered when the additional lands are proposed for annexation. The original proposal by the City proposed to add approximately 475 acres to the sphere of the City. LAFCo staff has recommended the proposal be amended to add approximately 253 acres to the Sphere of Influence and remove approximately 171 acres from the existing SOI. The resulting net increase will be approximately 82 acres in the proposed amended SOI. The additional lands are located primarily on the north City limits east of West Biggs Gridley Road and west of the proposed SR 99 Bypass. The lands to be removed are located primarily in the southeast area of the City. NOTICE AND HEARING REQUIRED: Yes Proceeding No. 00-09 ■ Report and Recommendation ■ March 2, 2000 EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REMARKS: Sphere of Influence Request Process Pursuant to Government Code §56428 the City has formally requested that the Executive Officer present the Commission with a proposed amendment to the existing SOI. The request was made through the submission of an application on August 9, 1999, followed by the submission of appropriate fees on September 22, 1999. The request was-supported with the submittal of a Master Service Element and the current Gridley General Plan, both adopted in June 1999. The City has also certified a Final Environmental Impact Report �- (FEIR)for their General Plan Amendment and the proposed SOI Amendment in May 1999. The City was the lead agency for the evaluation and consideration of the General Plan Amendments. LAFCo is the lead agency for the evaluation and consideration of the SOI Amendment. It is now the responsibility of LAFCo to review the submitted documents to determine their adequacy and consider possible actions. Pursuant to the requirements of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (§56425), the Commission; in determining the SOI, must consider the following items: ■ The present and planned land uses in the area, including agricultural and open space lands. ■ The present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area. ■ The present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services which the agency provides or authorized to provide. ■ The existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area if the commission determines that they are relevant to the agency. It is the Commissions responsibility to find a balance between the growth needs of the p Y City, the functional level of public services which may be impacted, and the agricultural operations that surround .the "island" City. A variety of policies have been adopted by the City in their General Plan and are supported by the mitigation measures found in the FEIR that address potential impacts of the requested SOI expansion. Additionally, the Commission has exercised its independent authority to significantly reduce the requested Sphere boundary to more accurately match the growth projections and necessary acres for sustainable growth. Tremendous effort has been applied to reaching a compromise solution that meets the needs of the City of Gridley, the Butte County Farm Bureau, the County of Butte, and the affected special districts. It is the Commission's role to facilitate responsible growth while minimizing impacts to urban services and the premature conversion of agricultural/open space lands. ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ 2 Proceeding No. 00-09 ■ Report and Recommendation ■ March 2, 2000 The project that is recommended by staff meets these goals and represents a blending of solutions to maximize parcel utility while minimizing collateral impacts. The significant issues of consideration are outlined below. Project Description The original proposal by the City proposed to add approximately 475 acres to the SOI of the City. Following a thorough review of all documents, written comments, public testimony, and several months of discussions with affected parties, LAFCo staff has recommended the proposal be amended to add approximately 253 acres to the Sphere of Influence and remove approximately 171 acres from the existing SOI. The resulting net increase will be approximately 82 acres in the proposed amended SOI.. The additional lands are located primarily on the north City limits, east of West Biggs Gridley Road, and west of the proposed SR 99 Bypass. The lands to be removed are located primarily in the southeast area of the City. The Commission, in response to a request from the City, allowed for consideration of an additional 35 acre parcel (Banes) if compelling arguments could be made. This request is discussed below in further detail. Sphere of Influence Boundary The City had originally proposed to include lands with the SOI that are not projected in their plans or environmental documents for annexation within the 20-year effective life of the plan. As the 20-year service boundary is the standard set forth in the Commissions Policies and Procedures Manual, these lands have been identified for removal from the SOI. Approximately 167 acres of these lands are in the existing southeast SOI and approximately 300 acres in the north and west are requested as part of the Amendment process. Including these lands would be in conflict with state law and LAFCo's Policies for orderly expansion of urban areas. The City has reviewed the staff recommendations and responded in their letter of 2/14/00 (Attachment 1) with specific comments and requests that are discussed below. Banes Property The primary request was to include the entire 35 acre Banes property to the SOI. Presently, the City has projected approximately 15 acres of the parcel to be placed in phase 4 (15-20 year period) of the proposed SOI, with the remaining 20 acres placed in phase 5, or beyond a 20 year period. The City argues that the 20 acres in question would replace the developable land that would be lost to the 300 foot agricultural buffer recommended on the Boeger and Deniz parcels north of the city. Additionally, the City indicates that the major sewer infrastructure may be available to the parcel earlier than • Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ 3 Proceeding P No. 00-09 • Report and Recommendation ■ March 2 2000 completed due to concerns that official action might be delayed or not accomplished. Staff has confirmed that the Development Services Department is presently reviewing the rezoning issue and it may be possible to continue the Urban Reserve designation without the SOI overlay. The Butte County Farm Bureau has indicated in their letter of 2/16/00 (Attachment 2) that their organization remains adamantly in favor of removing these lands concurrent with the present SOI action. Staff is recommending that these lands be removed and that the Commission and the Farm Bureau work closely with the County to maintain existing land division standards. Hollis Lane The Hollis Lane area located in the southern portion of this`area is of special concern. The 26 residential lots are .25 acres in size and utilize individual septic systems for sewage disposal. The area is also plagued by high groundwater in the wet season and homeowners routinely experience operational failures and/or loss of septic system use. The City has a sewer main in close proximity to this area along SR 99 which could provide sewer service to residents. The cost of placing a pump and sewer line to the area is approximated at$150,000 depending on design and distance. This area should be a high priority for annexation and the extension of urban services. This remains a highly recommended condition and has been supported by the City. Summary In conclusion, staff has significantly reduced the amount of land to be added to the Sphere while at the same time recommending the removal of existing lands further reducing the total developable acres. The resulting amended Sphere allows a limited amount of land in large parcels to be annexed as the market dictates and promotes the optimum efficiency in providing urban services while encouraging market-rate development. It is understood that the City cannot continue to rely on small, scattered in-fill parcels with multiple owners for a reliable source of readily developable lands to meet growth projections and housing targets identified in the City General Plan Housing Element. The compromise SOI boundary presented here is a reasonable attempt to provide adequate growth areas while not going significantly beyond the current SOI boundaries into viable agricultural lands. Impacts to Special Districts The Commission has applied considerable attention to the issue of drainage, both for this requested Sphere Amendment as well as past project deliberations. The primary issues are the effective protection of existing drainage facilities and the minimization of off-site drainage flows. In both cases, LAFCo recognizes that the City General Plan Public ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ 5 Proceeding No. 00-09 ■ Report and Recommendation ■ March 2, 2000 Facilities Element contains policies (Section 15, 1-6; Section 14, 1-5) that require all new development to either underground or fence open ditches, detain all post development storm water drainage, and provide a funding mechanism to maintain on-site facilities. Furthermore, the Commission has considered more stringent standards for drainage concerns including 100-year detention ponds with ten year out-flow, 50 ft. setbacks from canals/laterals, and strict fencing requirements including regular maintenance. Additionally, the FEIR provides mitigations (3.3-1) for the detention of post development storm water run-off. The City in its letter of 2/14/00, accepts the basic principle of no new net tun-off beyond current levels based on a 100-year storm event, but continues to object to the ten year outflow requirement. Their arguments are clearly outlined in the attached letter and staff does not have the engineering expertise to critically elaborate on arguments presented. The Commission has been continually advised by staff that an agreement will not likely be reached between the affected districts and the City. It is most likely an issue that will require resolution on a project-by-project basis at the time annexations are proposed. It may be in the best interest of all parties to consider a basic condition that simply states that It ad 1aJA a'i4fs%formwater run-off will be permitted beyond predevelopment levels and that all drainage plans must reflect this standard prior to annexation." Such a revised condition will allow for individual scenarios to develop while still protecting the interest of district landowners related to downstream flooding and ongoing facility maintenance. Such a condition is a clear recommendation of the Farm Bureau prior to full build out of the SOI. Agricultural Impacts Land Conversion The conversion of agricultural lands is an unavoidable impact of urban expansion given the geographic location of the City of Gridley. The Commission has reviewed a variety of scenarios that would allow the City to achieve its growth targets for housing while minimizing the conversion of agricultural lands. Staff has recommended a significant reduction in the number of acres that the City had originally requested to be added to the Sphere. The original proposal by the City of Gridley proposed to add approximately 475 acres to the Sphere of the City. LAFCo staff has recommended the proposal be amended to add approximately 253 acres to the Sphere of Influence and remove approximately 171 acres from the existing SOI as shown on the map. The resulting net increase will be approximately 82 acres in the proposed amended SOI. The additional lands are immediately adjacent to developed residential areas and represent a logical extension of services. This compromise allocation of SOI lands is intended to reconcile the ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ 6 Proceeding No. 00-09 ■ Report and Recommendation ■ March 2, 2000 Commission's internal policies of agricultural and open space land conversions as well as the statutory responsibility under state law to limit premature agricultural land conversions. Agricultural Operations Impacts Additionally, the Commission has considered the policies of the Butte County Agricultural Element and the comments of the Development Services Department. This consideration has resulted in the recommendation for a 300 ft. agricultural buffer and the protection of, irrigation/reclamation facilities through permanent easements/setbacks, and the reduction of converted acreage. In support of these recommendations, the Gridley General Plan has adopted policies that included buffers, clustering of development away from agricultural operations, the use of natural.barriers between agricultural uses and development, right-to- farm statements, and the adoption of an agricultural overlay zone to be used for existing agricultural operations within City limits. The City has indicated in their 2/14/00 letter that the absolute requirement for a 300 foot agricultural buffer is unnecessarily burdensome, creates a greater role for the Agricultural Commissioner than was intended, and is not an equal application of the standard throughout the County. Finally, it is suggested that such a buffer requirement constitutes a taking of property. The Commission,.in its role as legislative body, is not "taking" any property by establishing an agricultural protection policy for a legislative act such as a SOI amendment. This is.no different than the use of the "green line" in the Butte County General Plan which is a similar legislative process. The Commission is responsible to reconcile its actions with the plans and policies of the impacted agencies. ,It has repeatedly been the response of the County and the Agricultural Commissioner to adopt a 300 foot buffer consistent with the Agricultural Element. It is not arbitrary at this time to apply this standard to the proposed SOI amendment request. It is also not the Commission's role to keep a record of potential applications of this policy by other agencies. Each agencies actions are taken in response to the requested action reviewed. Staff continues to recommend the application of the 300 foot buffer as requested by the impacted and affected agencies and the Butte County Farm Bureau. Transportation The Commission has considered the impacts related to the general circulation of traffic within the larger urban area. It is not the Commission's primary responsibility to enforce the Butte County General Plan, but rather to review the policies of all affected local agencies and make determinations resulting in the minimization of impacts in relationship to Commission actions. The FEIR provides mitigations (3.5-1,3.7-4) which require traffic impact analyses/studies for new discretionary development that address both internal ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ 7 Proceeding No. 00-09 ■ Report and Recommendation ■ March 2, 2000 traffic circulation as well as impacts on County roadways. The City General Plan Circulation Element further addresses traffic issues with specific policies. Policy B-10 establishes a standard of Level of Service "C" for local designated arterial streets, Level of Service "D" for intersections with designated local arterial streets, and Level of Service "E" for State Highway 99. Policy B-11 commits the City to providing $350,000 as its contribution to the Highway 99 improvement project that includes widening the Highway between Magnolia Street (East Gridley Road) and Spruce Street, installation of a continuous left-turn lane, and coordination of new and existing traffic signals, provided that the remaining funding is made available by other affected agencies. The Butte County Farm Bureau has continued concerns regarding impacts to the circulation of agricultural vehicles on congested rural roadways, including inadequate railroad crossings. As discussed above, the internal circulation policies of the City are within its legislative domain, however, impacts to County roadways and SR 99 can be considered when specific annexation and development proposals are brought forward. Environmental Review LAFCo's Role Pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (§56428), the Commission's staff has considered the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) related to the preparation of appropriate environmental documents. The Commission had the option of acting as the lead agency for the SOI amendment. However the City of Gridley proceeded to assume lead agency status, and prepare an EIR in connection with the SOI amendment, circulate it and adopt it . After review of the Gridley EIR, and with the additional mitigation measures proposed by LAFCo, the Commission has previously indicated informally that it is comfortable acting as a responsible agency under CEQA with regard to this project. As a responsible agency, LAFCo is required under §15096 of the CEQA Guidelines to consider the EIR prepared by the lead agency, respond to comments received on the lead agency's EIR, and may adopt additional mitigation measures to mitigate impacts within the responsible agency's area of responsibility. Comments On the EIR Comments related to the SOI Amendment request have been received from the City of Gridley, Reclamation District No. 833, Butte Water District, the Butte County Farm Bureau, John Meeker., Butte County Department of Development Services, and the Butte Environmental Council. The comments have been reviewed by staff and appropriate responses have been incorporated into the Executive Officer's Report and the attached ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ 8 1 Proceeding No. 00-09 ■ Report and Recommendation ■ March 2, 2000 findings and conditions. A separate response letter was sent to the Butte Environmental Council specifically addressing their comments which is also attached to the Final EIR. These responses are associated with the FEIR and will be considered when reviewing future annexations and project proposals. Adequacy In making a determination as to the adequacy of existing environmental documents, the Commission should consider the following documents that it has been presented with, and has reviewed: • The Initial Study prepared by the City of Gridley for the Sphere of Influence Amendment which determined that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) would be prepared. • The City of Gridley Sphere of Influence Amendment Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) prepared by the City of Gridley, dated December 1998 and the City of Gridley Sphere of Influence Amendment Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) prepared by the City of Gridley, dated May 1999. • The comments submitted by responsible agencies along with the testimony and written comments submitted by other affected agencies,private organizations and individuals. • The response to comments prepared by LAFCo staff and submitted with this report. The Commission now has the decision to affirm the EIR for the SOI Amendment adopted and certified by the City of Gridley, or, to find that the documents do not adequately address the potential significant impacts to the environment. In making that determination, the Commission should consider the following direction regarding "standards for adequacy of an EIR set forth in the CEQA Guidelines, Section 15151: CEQA Guidelines Section 15151: An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decision-makers with information which enables them to make a decision which intelligently takes account of environmental consequences. An ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ 9 Proceeding No. 00-09 ■ Report and Recommendation ■ March 2, 2000 evaluation of the environmental effects of a proposed project need not be exhaustive, but the sufficiency of an EIR is to be reviewed in the light of what is reasonably feasible. Disagreement among experts does not make an EIR inadequate, but the EIR should summarize the main points of disagreement among the experts. The courts have looked not for perfection, but for adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure. Based on the adequacy requirements established in CEQA §15151, Staff recommends that the Commission find that the Certified FEIR prepared and submitted by the City of Gridley, in conjunction with the amended mitigation measures established by the Commission, and the responses to comments on the FEIR prepared by LAFCo staff, provide the Commission with sufficient information to enable them to make a decision which intelligently takes account of environmental consequences and adopts reasonably feasible measures to mitigate the adverse impacts of the Sphere Amendment. Future Annexations It should be clearly understood that the Commission, in reviewing the submitted environmental documents, is only considering an amendment to the Sphere of Influence and not specific annexation proposals or individual development projects which may present specific impacts not associated with the broader policy question at hand. The primary purpose of the Sphere of Influence is to provide guidance for the location of future growth and establish the ability of the City to provide services to the proposed growth area. It is not the purpose of the Sphere of Influence Plan to resolve all potential impacts of new development, but to provide guidance for local decision makers in managing growth boundaries of local agencies. The Commission should make it clear to the City that while it accepts the general mitigation measures proposed for the SOI amendment, it will not allow the City to rely on the General Plan and FEIR for future project-specific impacts. This statement has been included as a condition of approval for the SOI amendment. ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Affirmation of the Environmental Impact Report for the Sphere of Influence Amendment adopted and certified by the City of Gridley. 2. Adoption of Amendment of the Sphere of Influence of the City of Gridley subject to the following findings and conditions; and ■Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ 10 Proceeding No. 00-09 ■ Report and Recommendation ■ March 2, 2000 Section 1. Environmental Findings: A. The Commission has reviewed and considered the Final EIR for the Gridley Sphere of Influence Amendment, consisting of the following: (1) The Draft EIR prepared by the City of Gridley as Lead Agency. (2) Comments and recommendations received by the City of Gridley on the Draft EIR either verbatim or in summary. (3) A list of persons, organizations and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR. (4) The responses of the Lead Agency to significant environmental points raised both during and after the review and consultation process. (5) Comments and recommendations received by LAFCo on the Final EIR either verbatim or in summary and LAFCo staff responses thereto. (6) Mitigation Measures added by LAFCo. B. The Commission certifies that it has held a duly noticed public hearing and heard testimony and received written comments from affected agencies at noticed public hearings and has responded to those comments; C. The Commission confirms the Final EIR for the Sphere of Influence Amendment and finds that in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15090, the Final EIR for the proposed Sphere of Influence Amendment has been completed in compliance with CEQA and was presented to the Commission and the Commission reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final EIR and comments on the Final EIR prior to approving the project. D. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15090, the Final EIR reflects the Lead Agency's independent judgment and analysis. E. The implementation of the proposed Sphere of Influence Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment in certain respects identified in Sections 3.1 (Land Use, Population and Housing), 3.2 (Geologic Resources), 3.7 (Public Services and Utilities), 3.9 (Biological Resources) and 5.4 (Effects Found Not to Be Significant) of the Final EIR. ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ 11 Proceeding No. 00-09 ■ Report and Recommendation ■ March 2, 2000 F. With respect to the significant effects detailed in the Final EIR for the proposed SOI Amendment and found to be relevant to the Commission's action and based on the information set forth in the Final EIR, the Commission finds and determines that: (1) Measures have been required in or incorporated into the project to mitigate conversion of approximately 253 acres of prime agricultural land to nonagricultural uses during the 2000-2020 planning period, identified in Sections 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 of the Final EIR. However, these mitigation measures cannot reduce the impacts to a level that is less than significant. A certain level of mitigation will be provided by the measures identified in Section 2 and 3 of this report. There are no feasible mitigation measures or project alternatives which will reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. (2) Measures have been required in or incorporated into the project which will mitigate impacts resulting from the shift in location of land use conflicts between urban and agricultural land uses at the urban/agricultural interface, identified in Sections 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 of the Final EIR, to a level that is less than significant. (3) Measures have been required in or incorporated into the project which will mitigate impacts resulting from the lack of logical and orderly boundaries due to approval of the proposed Sphere of Influence Amendment, identified in Sections 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 of the Final EIR, to a level that is less than significant. (4) Measures have been required in or incorporated into.the project which will mitigate impacts of increases in downstream flows due to development in accordance with the General Plan Amendments, identified in Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 of the Final EIR, to a level that is less than significant. (5) Measures have been required in or incorporated into the project which will mitigate adverse impacts on riparian habitats, agricultural operations and surface water quality due to increased discharge into surface waters resulting from development in accordance with the General Plan Amendments, identified in Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 of the Final EIR, to a level that is less than significant. (6) Measures have been required in or incorporated into the project to mitigate reduction in roadway and intersection service levels in the City and proposed ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ 12 ■ ■ Proceeding No. 00-09 Report and Recommendation March 2, 2000 identified in Sections 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 of the Final EIR Sphere of Influence, en , to a level that is less than significant. (7) Measures have been required in or incorporated into the project which will mitigate impacts related to public safety hazards resulting from increased residential development in proximity to irrigation and drainage canals, identified in Sections 3.6.2 and 3.6.3 of the Final EIR, to a level that is less than significant, and are identified in Section 2 of this report. (8) Measures have been required in or incorporated into the project which will mitigate adverse impacts on operations of irrigation districts due to conversion of irrigated agricultural uses within the proposed Sphere of Influence to urban uses, identified in Sections 3.7.2 and 3.7.3 of the Final EIR, to a level that is less than significant as identified in Section 2 of this report. G. All significant environmental.effects identified in the Final EIR for the proposed Sphere of Influence Amendment that can be feasibly mitigated have been reduced to an acceptable level in that: (1) All significant environmental effects that can feasibly be avoided have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant as determined and as set forth in these findings and the FEIR. (2) A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been identified and adopted by the City of Gridley which will, monitor and ensure that the mitigation measures identified will be instituted as described in the FEIR H. Statement of Overriding Considerations: Pursuant to Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Commission finds that the economic and social benefits of the proposed project documented in the FEIR and the Sphere of Influence Plan, such as expanding the housing opportunities and economic growth opportunities in the City of Gridley, outweigh the adverse impacts of the conversion of prime agricultural land, an impact which cannot be eliminated or reduced to a level that is less than significant and which is unavoidable as the City grows. Section 2. Findings For Adoption of the Sphere of Influence Amendment A. The Commission has considered the factors determined by the Commission to be relevant to this proposal, including, but not limited to, Sphere of Influence and ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ 13 Proceeding No. 00-09 ■ Report and Recommendation ■ March 2, 2000 General Plan consistency, and other factors specified in Government Code Sections 56425 and 56428 and as described in the staff report dated February 24, 2000 for the meeting of March 2, 2000 in that: (1) The Commission has considered the present and planned land uses in the area, including agricultural and open space lands as described in the Butte County General Plan Land Use Element and Agricultural Element and the City of Gridley General Plan Land Use Element; and (2) The Commission has considered the present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area as described in the City of Gridley Master Services Element and the City of Gridley General Plan Public Facilities Element, Circulation Element, Open Space Element and Housing Element; and (3) The Commission has considered the present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services which the agency provides or is authorized to provide as described in.the City of Gridley Master Services Element and the City of Gridley General Plan Public Facilities Element, Circulation Element, and Open Space Element; and (4).... The Commission has considered-the existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area as described in the Butte County General Plan Agricultural Element and received as testimony in public. hearings; and (5) 'The Commission has considered the conversion of prime agricultural lands as constituent of the Final EIR and through the adoption of Overriding Considerations Findings in Section 1 of this report. B. The amended Sphere of Influence shall include . approximately 253 acres representing four (4) parcels identified on LAFCo Exhibit 1". C. The amended Sphere of Influence will remove approximately 167 acres from the existing Sphere of Influence representing forty-nine (49) parcels identified on LAFCo Exhibit "1". ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ 14 ' 1 Proceeding No. 00-09 ■ Report and Recommendation ■ March 2, 2000 Section 3. Terms Conditions required by LAFCo: Pursuant to its authority under Part 2, Chapter 4 and Part 3, Chapter 5 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Butte LAFCo incorporates the following terms and conditions into the Sphere Plan for the City of Gridley and the FEIR: A. The approximately 167 acres of land in the existing SOI in the southeast area designated as the Urban Reserve shall be removed immediately and be requested to be rezoned by the County to SR-5 (Suburban Residential-5 acre minimum parcels) to preserve the rural residential character of the area. B. The.City of Gridley shall prioritize the annexation and extension of sewer services to Hollis Lane residential parcels in conjunction with the extension of sewer service to other vacant lands. The Commission should coordinate the exploration of developing a funding source for this project in cooperation with the County, the City and local residents. The Commission may require annexation of all or a portion of these properties as a condition of further annexations. C. The City of Gridley through conditions of future project approvals, shall provide an agricultural buffer along the unincorporated boundary of the amended SOI. The agricultural buffer shall be initially established with a 300 feet width as prescribed in the Agricultural Element. Future adjustments are possible at the time of parcel annexation in accordance with prescribed standards set by the Agricultural Commissioner and Agricultural Element policies of the Butte County General Plan. The buffer shall be flexible in location, but will always be present at the boundary of the interface with the unincorporated agriculturally zoned lands and the SOI. D. Two parcels totaling approximately 58 acres, identified on LAFCo Exhibit "1", located in the northeast area of the proposed SOI and identified on the map are designated by the City of Gridley for general commercial uses. This area shall be re-designated for agricultural-industrial uses by the City of Gridley to reduce the potential for incompatibility with agricultural operations and provide additional lands for agriculturally related processing facilities. The Commission will deny any future annexation of these parcels if they are proposed for other than agricultural/industrial uses. E. All open surface water transport facilities shall be provided a minimum 50 foot access and maintenance easement along the affected facilities measured from the centerline of the affected facility. Easements may be reduced with the approval of the affected operator. ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ 15 Proceeding No. 00-09 Report and Recommendation March 2, 2000 F. All open surface water transport facilities shall be either under-grounded or fenced, in accordance with standards previously adopted by the Commission for the protection of the affected facilities. The City shall establish a funding mechanism to provide for the ongoing maintenance of access restricting structures. G. The City shall provide a plan for the mitigation of peak stormwater flows resulting from new development within the SOI based on a 100-year storm event, unless compelling arguments can be proven by affected District engineers that a greater standard is necessary for the health, safety and welfare of area residents. The detention basin shall discharge the post development run-off at a rate less than or equal to a 10-year storm event. The drainage plan shall be prepared and submitted to the affected District 45 days in advance of an annexation request being made to LAFCo. H. All Commission fees must be paid in full prior to filing the Certificate of Completion. I. The Commission has accepted and affirmed the FEIR for the Sphere of Influence amendment as a general policy level action intended to provide a broad discussion of growth boundaries and potential impacts. The City shall not rely on the Sphere of Influence FEIR to support or mitigate all project specific impacts identified during the annexation process. The Commission will require additional environmental review for discussions of drainage impacts, circulation/traffic impacts, and agricultural operations impacts at the time an annexation application is submitted with specific project descriptions. Dated: February 24, 2000 Respectfully submitted, Stephen Lucas Associate Planner Attachments: 1. City of Gridley Letter 2/14/00 2. Butte County Farm Bureau Letter 2/16/00 3. LAFCo Letter to Butte Environmental Council of 4. LAFCo Exhibit "1" Map K:\PLANNING\LAFCO\PROJECTSkGRID-SOI\STAFF5.WPD • Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ 16 1 ATTACHMENT "1" CITY OF GRIDLEY 685 Kentucky S, Gridley, CA 9594E February 14, 2000 Paula Leasure, Executive Officer Butte County Local Agency Formation Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 = - RE: Conditions proposed for expansion of Gridley's Sphere of Influence Dear Paula: The City of Gridley requests that the following changes be made to the conditions LAFCo proposes to attach to approval of an expansion of the City's Sphere of Influence: 1. LAFCo condition#1: Existing lands within the SOI and the requested lands to be added to the SOI that are not projected to develop at urban densities or receive urban services within a 20-year period will not be included in the SOI. I Requested modification: Include the 35-acre Banes property for reasons described in the attached report of findings. 2. LAFCo condition#2: The approximately 167 acres of land in the existing SOI in the southeast area designated as Urban Reserve should be.rezoned by the County to SR-5 (Suburban Residential-5 acre minimum parcels) to preserve the rural residential character of the area. Requested modification: Keep the 167-acre area within the City's SOI unless and until the area is actually rezoned to SR-5, for reasons described in the attached materials. 3. LAFCo condition #4: Provide an agricultural buffer along the unincorporated boundary of the amended SOI. The agricultural buffer shall be initially established with a 300-foot width as prescribed in the Agricultural Element. Future adjustments are possible at the time of parcel annexation in accordance with prescribed standards set by the Agricultural Commissioner and Agricultural Element policies of the Butte County General Plan. The buffer shall be flexible in location, but will always be present at the boundary of the interface with the unincorporated agriculturally zoned lands and the SOI. COUNCIL•ADMINISTRATION•FINANCE•(916)846.5695 PL-INNING•PUBLIC WORKS•BUILDING-(916)846-3631 FAX NUMBER FOR ALL CITY OFFICES-(916)846-3229 RE: Conditions for Gridley's SOI February 14, 2000 Page 2 Requested modification: Change the wording as follows, for reasons described in the attached materials. An agricultural buffer shall be provided along the unincorporated boundary of the amended SOI, where such a buffer is necessary to implement the goals and policies described in the Butte County Agricultural Element (BCAE). The width and nature of the buffer shall conform to applicable goals and policies of the BCAE, the Open Space Element of Gridley's General Plan, and written agreements between affected property owners. A buffer shall be flexible in location,'in that it will exist only at the boundary of the interface between the amended SOI and adjacent unincorporated agricultural lands, and will shift in location as that boundary shifts. 4. LAFCo condition#8: The City shall provide a plan for the mitigation of peak stormwater flows resulting from new development within the SOI based on a 100-year storm event, unless compelling arguments can be demonstrated by affected District engineers that a greater standard is necessary for the health, safety and welfare of area residents. The detention basin shall discharge the post development run-off at a rate less than or equal to a 10 year storm event. The drainage plan shall be prepared and submitted to the affected District 45 days in advance of an annexation request being made to LAFCo. Requested modification: Delete the bolded sentence that would limit the peak rate of stormwater discharges to a 10-year storm, for reasons described in the attached materials. If you have questions about the information in this letter, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 911- Jo Sherman Planning Director INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF CHANGES TO LAFCO'S PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR GRIDLEY'S EXPANDED SOI, AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF GRIDLEY 1. Support for request to include the 35-acre Banes property in Gridley's SOI. A. Fifteen acres of the Banes property IS within the area Gridley has projected to develop at urban densities within a 20-year period. As LAFCo's condition is written, that area should be included within Gridley's SOI. B. Since the Master Service Element was prepared, one-half of the very expensive trunk sewer infrastructure needed to serve the southwest Gridley area has been constructed. It is now much more likely that the remainder of the infrastructure may be completed within a 20-year period. C. The Master Service Element anticipates serving the amount of land that Gridley estimates will be needed for development within the next 20 years. All of the Banes property would have been included within the 20-year period, if Gridley had adjusted the 20-year growth area for non-existent development potential within an agricultural buffer on the Boeger and Deniz properties. D. A 300-foot buffer would exclude development of 44 acres, if the buffer were imposed in a straight line that is aligned with the north end of the Boeger site from West Biggs-Gridley Road, through the Deniz property to Highway 99. More area will be excluded if a 300-foot buffer is imposed on the Deniz property along the curved course of the drainage ditch. Although less area will be excluded if the buffer depth is reduced,the excluded area is likely to equal at least the 20-acre portion of the Banes property that Gridley did not include within the City's projected 20-year growth area. E. Gridley would allow cluster development to maximize the allowable density of development on properties subject to a buffer recuirement. However, few if any i cluster developments have been proposed within Butte County, because.evidently there is not sufficient demand for clustered housing. Asa practical matter, fewer homes may be constructed on a property, if part of that property is not allowed to be developed. Therefore, it is appropriate to increase Gridley's projected 20-year growth area to include all of the Banes property. F. If the Banes property is excluded from Gridley's :SOI, all large developable properties will be owned by two families. Gridley needs to include within its designated growth area a wider range of opportunities for development of housing. i February 14, 2000 Support for changes to LAFCo conditions for Gridley's SOI Page 1 2. Support for request to keep the 167-acre area zoned for 1-acre lots within Gridley's SOI until the area is actually rezoned by the County. A. At present, Butte County has zoned all unincorporated lands that are not within Gridley's SOI to preclude subdivision to less than 5 acres. The current County zoning for this 167-acre area allows 1-acre lots. B. Potential adverse environmental and land use impacts may occur if the current zoning designation of SR-1 is allowed to become effective in the 167-acre area. Over one mile of the State-adopted Highway.99 Bypass route traverses this area, and the economic feasibility of constructing the route at this location(including the alignment north and south of the area)might be compromised if additional development occurs. Also, development of the area to one-acre lots on septic tanks and wells could create water quality problems. C. The City can support removal of the area IF it-is rezoned to SR-5. However, it always takes time to rezone a large area, and rezone proposals are sometimes opposed with sufficient vigor that no rezone occurs. D. Until the area is actually rezoned and removed from Gridley's SOI, the City could support classifying it as "an area potentially in need of urban services, but - unavailable for development unless re-designated by the City of Gridley and by LAFCo as part of Gridley's 20-year urban growth area." February 14, 2000 Support for changes to LAFCo conditions for Gridley's SOI Page 2 r . 3. Support for request to change the-wording of the condition related to agricultural buffers. NOTE: The City of Gridley is an agricultural community which understands the value of agricultural production and the need to protect it. However we have the following concerns about the way the LAFCo condition is presently worded. A. The Butte County Agricultural Element(BCAE) sets a standard for protection of agriculture that is acceptable County-wide. For adoption of a SOI, it should be sufficient for LAFCo to simply refer to compliance with applicable BCAE standards. B. There should not be two separate standards for development in Butte County: a more stringent standard for projects that involve LAFCo and annexation, and a lesser standard for projects that do not(such as projects in Butte County). LAFCo's condition as written represents an interpretation and rephrasing of BCAE standards. If literally interpreted, LAFCo's condition could place greater restrictions on the use of land around Gridley than would be required by the Butte County Agricultural Element (BCAE). For instance: 1) The policies of the BCAE require a buffer to protect "agricultural uses." The LAFCo policy places a buffer-- a 300-foot buffer-- adjacent to a cemetery and a residential lot. 2) The BCAE states that the "desired" standard is 300 feet, and gives "adjustments" the same weight of authority as the 300-foot standard by providing for adjustments in the same sentence that addresses the buffer. The LAFCo policy unequivocally establishes a 300-foot buffer,provides for adjustments in a separate subsequent sentence (which could be interpreted as secondary status), and specifically states that the Agricultural Commissioner shall be involved in reviewing those adjustments (which could be interpreted as according that office a greater role than is contemplated in the BCAE). C. LAFCo should consider relevant policies of all affected jurisdictions, including the City of Gridley. LAFCo's condition should refer to City policies as well as County policies (BCAE) D. Restrictions that significantly impair the use of property now come under vigorous legal scrutiny. A 300-foot buffer should not, even by implication, be an "automatic condition" regardless of circumstances, which is a status that could be implied by the wording of LAFCo's condition. Ir is appropriate to formulate the specifics regarding appropriate conditions for each annexation to Gridley at the time of the annexation. February 14, 2000 • Support for changes to LAFCo conditions for Gridley's SOI Page 3 4. Support for request to allow a 100-year pre-development peak stormwater discharge rate from annexing properties in Gridley's SOI. A. Full mitigation of drainage impacts from development in Gridley should arguably occur during storms of concern to local drainage districts, when post-development peak stormwater releases are limited to a rate criteria that is based upon the pre-development peak rate of discharge for un-saturated soil conditions during a 100-year(1%probability) design storm event. Ci staff has communicated with RD833 staff to identify and clarify City the situations and locations for which a threat of flood damage exists. Two situations have been identified: 1. Short,very intense storms, during which water in the ditches rises and falls rapidly. Example: The 0.66 inches of rainfall that fell in 20 minutes on January 12, 1998. (Rainfall of this intensity and duration is classified as greater than a 100-year storm event based upon Gridley's design rainfall intensity-duration data.) Mitigation: By maintaining the City's current design standard 100-year pre-development stormwater release rate, the post-development project site should maintain the drainage status quo during such storms, and not worsen existing impacts. 2. Design storm events following prolonged storms of"average" intensity, during which undeveloped soils become saturated and shed Q12roximately the same volume of stormwater at a similar discharge rate as developed property. Example: For most examples of flooding identified by RD833 staff,the Gridley area has received more than 8 inches of rain in a month, and/or more than 12 inches of rain in two consecutive months. (Other storms of concern involved short, intense storms of significant magnitude.) This information can be verified by the rainfall records the Joint Water District has maintained since 1923. Mitigation: In Gridley's hypothetical example for a"typical" 76-acre property, the maximum rate of post-development stormwater runoff allowed for any storm event would be 10.32 CFS, whether the soils are saturated or not. In contrast, the peak rate of runoff from the undeveloped site with saturated soils would be more than 32 CFS during a 10-year design storm, and more than 56 CFS during a 100-year design storm event. This analysis supports a conclusion that restricting the post-development rate of stormwater discharge to the pre-development peak rate from unsaturated soils could actually benefit the reclamation and drainage districts during the most problematic storms, by significantly reducing the rate of discharge that would have occurred from saturated soils on the undeveloped site. February 14, 2000 • Support for changes to LAFCo conditions for Gridley's SOI Page 4 B. Local agencies that require mitigations that are greater than the demonstrated project impacts are subject to legal challenges which include obstructingdevelopment of affordable housing. and "takings" of real property District trustees and staff have stated that their ditches were designed for a 50-year storm. However, District documents state the ditches were designed to convey stormwater runoff at a rate of/z inch in 24 hours, which based upon the City of Gridley's rainfall-duration design data, equates to approximately a one-year design storm event. Ditches that were designed to serve 38,000 acres during a one-year storm will not have adequate hydraulic capacity to carry the runoff from prolonged storms of greater intensity and/or duration which produce saturated soils. When soils are saturated, which is when District ditches are the most impacted, approximately the same volume of stormwater may be discharged j from a site whether it is undeveloped or developed. jDevelopment pro-jects in Gridley should only be required to mitigate the drainage impacts of the development projects; local land developers and home buyers cannot legally be required to correct existing drainage system deficiencies for the benefit of the owners of the remaining acreage in the District. In Gridley's hypothetical example for a"typical" 76-acre property, maintaining the "pre-development 100-year rate"will reduce the post-development rate of discharge during a 100-year design storm event by approximately 50 CFS. Maintaining the "pre- development 10-year rate" will only reduce the peak discharge rate by another 3 CFS during a 100-year design storm event. However this relatively small incremental .reduction in the peak rate of discharge will require approximately 50%more storage volume in a detention facility. Given the information provided above, it would be very difficult for the City of Gridley to justify --and it is therefore inappropriate for the City to impose --a 10-year pre- development stormwater discharge rate for new development. C. Reclamation District No. 833 has identified only 3 properties adjacent to District ditches that serve the City which have structures that were nearly flooded during the extreme storms of 1983, 1986, 1995, and/or 1997. During these storms, several other agricultural properties east of the Hamilton Slough were at least partially inundated for a period of time that lasted from several hours to a day or more, until the storms subsided. Flood levels during these storms illustrate the extent to which District-wide drainage facilities are deficient when soils on undeveloped properties have become saturated. Rb833 has provided NO data to support their conclusion that a 100-year pre- development peak discharge rate won't mitigate new impacts from future development. D. It is premature to firmly establish now for all future annexations, an extreme level of mitigation that LAFCo may not want to enforce on all projects,particularly given the information provided above. Each project can be evaluated at the time of annexation. February 14, 2000 Support for changes to LAFCo conditions for Gridley's SOI Page 5 SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF . PEAK RATES OF STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM A HYPOTHETICAL 76-ACRE AGRICULTURAL PARCEL The following data is a summ= of an analysis of the peak stormwater discharge rates from a hypothetical 76-acre parcel of land around Gridley. The assumptions used in the analysis regarding slope of the land, rainfall intensities, times of concentration, and the level of anticipated development are described in the analysis that is attached to this summary. The peak rate of stormwater runoff that will be maintained by the standard adopted by the City of Gridley is shaded in the table below. UN-DEVELOPED SITE UN-DEVELOPED SITE DEVELOPED SITE DESIGN STORM EVENT UN-SATURATED SOIL SATURATED SOIL (cubic feet per second) (cubic feet per second) (cubic feet per second) 10- YEAR 6.92 38.15 40.14 25- YEAR 8.81 48.06 50.25 50- YEAR 9.31 50.80 53.14 100-YEAR 56.30 58.88 February 14, 2000 Support for changes to LAFCo conditions for Gridley's SOI Page 6 + identifies months with rainfall totals of _')+ inches (except Dec-Feb) * identifies months with rainfall totals of 8+ inches ; years of 3n+ inches FN: GRIDRAIN.XLS I I I I I 1 1 10:46 AM I M511998 SEASONAL RAINFALL IN INCHES AT GRIDLEY•CALIFORNIA BUTTE COUNTY FROM 192124 TO 1997.98 PERIOD OF 75 YEARS YEAR I JULYji AUG.I SEPT.1 OCT.I NOV. DEC.I JAN.I FE8.1 MARCH APRIL MAYI JUNEI TOTAL 192124 0.00 0.00 1 0.95 1.31 0.57 1.17 2.30 3.07 1.14 0.87 0.08 0.00 11.46 1924.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.36 1.53 5.64 1.20 5.99 2.26 1.33 1.07 0.50 22.88 192526 0.00 0.07 0.14 0.16 1 1.37 1.86 5.15 1 0 9.04 0.11 8.06 0.46 0.00 26.44 1926.27 0.00 0.18 Trace 1.71 7.55 0.67 3.04 1 5.34 1.87 1.25 0.52 0.56 22.69 1927.28 0.00 Trace Trace 1.74 3.61 2.53 2.82 1 2.81 + 5.08 0.77 0.00 0.00 19.36 1928-29 0.00 0.00 Trace 0.32 3.47 3.43 0.91 1 2.55 2.00 0.66 0.00 1.59 14.93 1929.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 8.20 4.82 1 2.06 3.50 097 1.18 0.00 21.18 1930.31 1 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.34 1.52 0.11 4.25 1 1.45 0.93 096 1.23 0.60 11.67 1931.32 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.18 2.14 8.23 2.06 1 1.16 0.57 1.15 1 2.48 0.00 18.98 1932.33 0.00 Trace 0.00 0.00 0.47 2.714.10 0.89 2.44 0.03 0.94 0.00 11.58 193134 Trace 0.00 0.02 1.41 0.00 6.14 1.25 3.71 1.38 0.32 1 0.32 0.28 14.83 1934.35 0.00 Trace 0.00 0.51 4.82 1.64 5.41 2.36 4.75 3.22 1 0.41 0.00 23.32 193536 Trace 0.00 0.25 0.69 1.44 2.97 4.08 9.03 1.51 1.62 0.87 0.74 23.20 1936-37 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.33 0.02 2.86 3.41 6.43 6.01 0.54 Trace 0.57 20.47 1937.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 } 6.54 SAB 3.58 1 6.98 5.17 1.98 0.62 Trace OF 30.75 rate 193940 Trace 0.00 0.36 0.76 0.06 1.39 10.601 a 8.19 4.03 1.02 1.20 0.07 27.68 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.55 2.44 9.15 3.32 3.87 1.14 0.2 194243 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.12 2.75 1 4.86 5.64 1 0.92 3.99 2.64 Trace 0.10 21.17 1943-44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.92 1 3.02 3.59 1 6.19 1.20 1.99 1 1.15 0.29 10.66 1944.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.32 4.65 3.13 1.22 4.83 3.80 1 0.18 1 1.07 0.26 20.46 194546 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.31 3.58 7.40 1.08 1 1.27 0.97 0.07 1 0.35 0.00 17.03 1946.47 0.10 0.00 0.29 0.21 2.80 1 4.17 0.551 2.63 2.31 0.83 0.12 0.70 14.71 1947-48 0.00 0.14 0.00 2.81 1.51 1 1.45 1.18 1 1.14 4.45 4.82 1 1.89 0.63 20.02 1948.49 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.35 1.10 3.29 0.74 1 1.68 5.60 000 1 0.63 0.00 13.71 1949-50 0.00 j 0.01 0.00 0.03 1 0.95 1.68 4.68 4.02 1.37 1 0.77 0.49 0.02 14.22 1950.51 0.00 1 Trace 0.06 2.41 1 4.96 5.49 4.43 1 2.44 0.32 0.73 0.87 0.00 21.71 1951.52 0.00 0.00 Trace 2.55 2.83 5.37 9.07 1.86 3.69 1.23 0.36 0.92 1 27.88 1952-53 0.21 1 0.00 Trace 0.25 2.70 8.09 4.17 0.02 2.28 2.02 0.90 0.41 21.05 195154 0.00 1 0.21 0.00 0.75 2.48 0.40 4.21 3.39 3.21 2.97 0.21 0.15 17.98 1954.55 0.02 0.20 0.00 0.07 3.51 4.12 3.23 1.03 0.29 2.22 0.21 0.00 14.90 195556 0.00 0.00 0.32 1.07 2.26 0 10.70 8.32 3.26 0.00 1.25 2.01 0.06 29.25 -,9v-5r- 0.00 0.00 0.54 1.22 0.08 4.54 1.25 1.46 1.57 0.00 13. 1957.58 0.00 0.00 1.57 3.37 0.30 3.32 4.39 0 9.64 3.93 4.12 0.84 0.18 31.66 1958.59 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.52 0.09 1.13 4.43 5.42 0.78 0.55 0.00 0.00 13.18 195980 0.00 Trace 1.84 0.00 1 0.00 5.15 4.89 3.32 3.18 1.17 1 0.77 0.00 20.32 1960.61 Trace 0.00 0.07 0.46 4.61 2.14 3.22 2.82 3.39 0.21 0.35 0.42 17.69 1961.62 0.00 Trace 0.13 0.16 2.34 2.52 0.66 7.23 2.32 0.36 0.51 Trace 16.23 196283 0.00 0.04 0.02 9.58 0.78 2.72 2.80 2.52 3.98 5.06 0.61 0.16 28.27 196384 0.00 0.00 0.17 2.93 5.20 0.54 4.22 0.25 1.74 09r 0.24 1 0.43 16.67 196485 Trace Trace 0.26 1.32 3.40 5.66 4.19 0.66 0.40 3.27 0.06 0.02 19.24 1965.66 Trace 1.05 Trace 0.00 4.61 2.44 1 3.06 1 3.01 0.66 0.57 0.08 0.07 15.55 196687 Trace Trace Trate 0.00 } 8.70 {.38 8.45 0.49 4.22 4.87 0.03 1.50 @ 30.64 1967-68 race B .2 9 16.65 196889 Trace 0.42 0.05 1.34 3.93 4.47 9.29 6.82 1.81 1.88 Trace 0.22 30.23 1969.70 Trace 0.00 0.00 1.1 .66 _79-8.44 2.12 2.85 0.30 0.00 0.79 24.30 1970.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.68 + 6.73 0.00 3.23 0.24 0.91 0.07 18.62 1971.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 1.36 3.83 1.41 1.79 0.33 1.16 1 0.58 0.46 11.63 1972-73 0.00 0.00 0.73 2.04 + 5.45 3.23 9.93 6.96 2.81 0.15 1 0.13 0.20 31.63 197174 0.00 0.00 0.47 2.11 } 7.95 4.31 1. 8 6.39 2.0! 0.00 0.25 28.96 1974.75 1.28 0.00 0.00 1.70 1.72 3.41 0.54 8.82 5.29 0.87 0.08 0.01 23.72 1.75 0.00 0.06 -14.02 1976.77 Trace 0.44 0.32 0.02 0.60 0.64 2.47 1.50 0.88 0.17 1.84 Trace 8.88 1977.78 0.06 0.00 0.67 0.16 1.70 5.04 10.89 3.97 5.62 2.77 0.20 0.10 31.18 1978.79 0.00 Trace 0.61 0.00 3.0 9 2.05 0.10 0.00 21.50 197980 0.05 Trace 0.06 3.07 2.81 4.57 5.40 7.97 3.09 0.90 0.52 0.23 28.69 1980.81 0.03 Trace 0.32 0.33 0.54 4.19 4.65 1.15 4.99 1.56 0.57 Trace 16.35 /981•e2 Trace 0.00 0.13 3.55 41• 733 5.12 5.79 2.69 5.38 3.94 Trace 0.57 34.10 198283 0.00 0.02 1.29 4.50 6.70 3.99 6.92 6.81 9.40 3.14 0.55 0.68 43.80 1963-84 race 1 .02 0.33 26.56 1984.85 0.00 0.88 0.05 2.10 t4.89 1.35 2.53 0.10 0.00 0.00 16.45 198586 0.04 0.20 1.46 0.87 8.57 1.92 9.42 4.39 1.00 0.35 0.00 31.45 198788 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 4.67 4.58 0.51 0.11 2.21 1.47 0.31 19.42 1988.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 4.92 3.55 146 8.18 0.48 0.38 0.36 20.86 1989.90 0.00 0.11 2.48 2.62, 0.95 0.00 1.80 1.98 0.45 3.07 0.00 18.199091 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 089 1.59 4.22 10.93 0.45 0.52 0.95 20.81991.92 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.95 O.SB 3.15 B.01 + 5.11 1.87 0.00 0.86 23.84 1992.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.15 0.45 6.42 9.48 8.58 3.13 2.12 1.80 1.12 35.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 2.00 3.13 .1 0.92 0.70 0.60 0.00 15.54 1994.95 0.00 0.00 0.06 1.18 4.38 6.21 15.20 0.90 12.12 2.60 1.24 1.13 4S.32 199598 Trace race 0.00 0.00 race 6.49 1.81 5. 0 2.82 .68 3.45 0.05 26.e0 199697 0.00 0.00 0.05 2.66 1.67 7.56 9.65 0.10 1.42 0.91 0.29 1.23 25.54 1997.98 0.00 0.63 0.20 1.18 ♦ 5.58 2.68 9.78 13.72 3.67 2.77 4.11 0.22 41.75 AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFALL 22.21 MAXIMUM ANNUAL RAINFALL: 15.32 MINIMUM ANNUAL RAINFALL: e.ee April 1963 : Parkside Addition flooded, Deople using rowboats Summer 1975 : RD833 doubles size of Traynor Canal crossing on Lateral E-1 N'01TE THE INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF YEARS HAVINr, 30+ INCHES OF RAINFALL SINCE 1967 ` CITY OF GRIDLEY Staff Memorandum DATE: January 23, 2000 TO: Frank Cook, Mayor Jo Sherman, Planning Director FROM: Ray D. Rolls, Consulting City Engineer SUBJECT: HYPOTHETICAL DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR 76 ACRE PARCEL WITH VARIOUS DISCHARGE RATE ALTERNATIVES In response to your request, I have made the analyses for the following stormwater discharge rates from potential detention basins for a hypothetical 76 Acre parcel of land around Gridley. The pre-development flows are based upon agricultural land with a slope of 3 feet per mile, with no adjacent street paving. Rainfall intensities were taken from the Gridley Public Works Construction Standards with a supplemental rate for the 50-year storm. The pre-development runoff coefficient used was 0.25 and the pre-development time of concentration computed was 205 minutes. The pre-development peak discharge rates computed were: Q,o = 6.92 CFS (3,105.70 GPM) Q25 = 8.81 CFS (3,953.93 GPM) Q50 = 9.31 CFS (4,178.33 GPM) Q,0 = 10.32 CFS (4,631.62 GPM) The analyses are based upon the assumption that the post-development condition is 304 single family homes on the theoretical 76 Acre parcel, with no parks, schools, or open space areas and no commercial, industrial or public facilities. Rainfall intensities were taken from the Gridley Public Works Construction Standards with a supplemental rate for the 50-year storm. The post-development composite runoff coefficient used was 0.62 and the post-development time of concentration computed was 40 minutes. The post-development peak discharge rates computed were: Q,o = 40.14 CFS (18,014.83 GPM) Q25 = 50.25 CFS (22,552.20 GPM) QW = 53.14 CFS (23,849.23 GPM) Q10 = 58.88 CFS (26,425.34 GPM) I hope that this information is responsive to your request. If you have any questions about the data, or the computations, please let me know. January 23, 2000 99045 The following tables summarize the data computed for a 100-year (1% probability design storm event) using the assumptions stated above. HYPOTHETICAL DRAINAGE ANALYSIS "GENERIC" 76-ACRE SITE 100-YEAR (1% PROBABILITY) DESIGN STORM EVENT BASIN DISCHARGE PEAK PRE- DETENTION STORM DURATION RATE STORM DEVELOPMENT VOLUME (CF) FOR PEAK FREQUENCY DISCHARGE FLOW STORAGE (MINS) RATE (CFS) 100-YEAR 10.317 193,574 300 50-YEAR 9.311 213,625 365 25-YEAR 8.808 225,336 410 10-YEAR 6,919 284,152 655 " STEPPED RATE" 6.919-10.317 335,564 410 RD833 1.781 1,046,549 9,380 t , CITY OF GRIDLEY Staff Memorandum DATE: January 28, 2000 TO: Frank Cook, Mayor Jo Sherman, Planning Director FROM: Ray D._Rolls, Consulting City Engineer SUBJECT: HYPOTHETICAL DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR 76 ACRE PARCEL WITH SATURATED AGRICULTURAL LAND In response to your request this morning, I have made the analyses for the following stormwater discharge rates from a saturated undeveloped hypothetical 76 Acre parcel of land around Gridley. The following pre-development flows are based upon "saturated" agricultural land with a slope of 3 feet per mile, with no adjacent street paving. Rainfall intensities were taken from the Gridley Public Works Construction Standards with a supplemental rate for the 50-year storm. The pre-development runoff coefficient used for the "saturated" condition was 0.80 and the pre-development time of concentration computed was 72 minutes. The pre-development peak discharge rates computed were: Q,o = 38.152 CFS (17,123.62 GPM) Q25 = 48.058 CFS (21,568.43 GPM) Q50 = 50.804 CFS (22,800.84 GPM) Q100 = 56.296 CFS (25,265.65 GPM) I hope that this information is responsive to your request. If you have any questions about the data, or the computations, please let me know. 3-IS retention in larger tracts will be most beneficial to the cities if the land is eventually developed. Goal 2 Conserve and stabilize agricultural land uses at city and commu-uty boundaries in order to protect agricultural lands from encroachment and conversion to urban uses. Policies 2.1 Agriculture shall not be made inviable by the economic impacts of urban development. 2.2 Encourage urban infill development within city limits and within existing unincorporated communities where development can more easily and readily be served by public infrastructure facilities. 2.3 Require development to provide land use transitions, setbacks and buffers between urban development and agricultural interface to reduce interference and conflict. 2.4 Create development and performance standards designed to protect agricultural uses from urban encroachment conflicts. 2.5 Encourage urban development to the LAFCo adopted Spheres of Influence. 2.6 Provide a clear delineation, on the General Plan Land Use Map, between long-term agricultural production lands and city/community areas. 2.7 Allow for the conversion of agricultural land within LAFCo Spheres of Influence where land has been determined to be irretrievably lost to urbanization. These would likely be areas where urban development has surrounded or substantially encroached upon agricultural land and has limited its continued productive use. Programs 2.1 Rezone unincorporated land within LAFCo-adopted Spheres of Influence to be consistent with urban densities and City-adopted General Plans. Cooperate with cities to make maximum efficient use of vacant lands within adopted Spheres of Influence. 2.2 The Zoning Ordinance shall require that a buffer be established on property proposed for residential development in order to protect a istinQ aoriculturai_uses from incompatible use conflicts. The d- standard shall be 300 feet, but may be adiustAil to address unusual circumstances. Guidelines, as part of the General Plan's implementation, shall be developed I illustrating buffer requirements for various situations. 2.3 Where development approval, other than residential, is proposed on lot(s) adjacent to an agricultural operation or Orchard and Field Crops land use category, the Zoning Ordinance I shall require a natural or man-make buffer between the development and the agricultural land use. The buffer shall be totally on the lot(s)where development is proposed. A buffer could be a topographic feature, a substantial tree stand, a water course or similarly defined feature. Draft EIR December,1998 Gridley GP and S01 Amendments i i 4 1, 1� 1� 1� 1 11 1 II'I_ ,' � =moo'•_=:_:_�-�d��Y' a'•-,a-,;�v'�'�%r,�`�` ■ -= aRt1t11te1111f �S__�■ -- _\�,, 6■■■ �_ ■�' I�.mss; '.�•l,� � _ __\';� a In■ 1 rr;`::=,:'n°j;= ■ \ 1111 1� ' _ `�- � • ' 1 11 111 li �• i • 111111!-(1111 _� ® - ►..�i� 1 ; w �• 11.11lilt•m-- • ■ i.l� ,may;;:■■ �11��0. '1'� ■:.�� .� • \ � �� , 1; ��i� 1111111 ��' - '- i.Al oil �;Y 1. ��_'•tea+ � ,111..111 4l+V•4�a i� .1111' sw M, milli 111 •_ ---uii r\ :,�' © ® � _ ,,II!► ��L:�rf ,r3 �aunty nnn/ n iii 11 M ittt�■111111■■111111■■1111.11 �� 1.1,111 _ \ �� MI R&H. �� 1 �'®illll�l ilial ®®i •„ .■■I _ IMMI _ iJ� l■■�.i•ter`,. d:�t-�.;1 ■.�.'=� M� 1-19 a'• 'PFS? '^.\ � ��■ t� � ` unnnnf� ■, - - - ■uteirneel■ LA © USE ELEMEN - • r e 0611thio 1z:04 FARM CREDIT + CH I Cb 4 530 538 7785 F40.-937, P02 BUTTE ATTACHMENT "2" i� COUNTY FARM BUREAU 00�� Serving Agrirulture For More Than fill Years February 16,2000 Mr.Carl Levcrcn7 Chairman Butte County LAFCo. 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 Dear Chairman Leverenz: The Butte County Farm Bureau Land Use Committee is in favor of the proposed compromise plan for the expansion of the Gridley Sphere of Influence.I understand the LAFCo staff is putting the finishing touches on the proposed plan.As part of the planned sphere expansion our committee will insist on the following conditions: • The 300-foot buffer must be part of the sphere expansion when it borders agricultural land. The buffer must be supplied by the landowner inside the sphere and is not the responsibility of the farmland owner. • The City of Gridley,Reclamation District 833 and Biggs NVest Gridley Irrigation District must have an agreement as to the adequacy of drainage facilities at fiill build out of the proposed sphere. • The agricultural lands in the southeast area of the existing sphere must be removed simultaneously with the addition of agricultural lands to the north,as part of the increased sphere. In addition,the Butte County Farm Bureau has major concerns regarding the following issues in as further residential development occurs in the North Gridley area: • Traffic on the West Biggs—Gridley(toad and on Highway 99E will increase to a level that will impede the transporting of agricultural implements and agricultural products.In addition, the increased traffic on an already crowded highway will pose major public safety issues. a The existing railroad crossings are inadequate to accommodate the futtue growth and build out of the new sphere.An overpass or underpass needs to be considered prior to any annexation into the City of Gridley. • Adequate school fees need to be charged as development occurs to pay for education facilities as the population increases. Fees for the transferof development credits program need to be considered on the development of this property.Though the county does not currently have a transfer of development credits program in place at this time,it is imperative fees are charge that can Wei be used to purchase farmland conservation easements. { 2580 Vennccr River lkmlevard Onwilk.California 9596 (530)533-1473 Fax:(530)533-6508 02;18/00 13:05 FARM CREDIT CHICO + 530538 7785 N0.937 D03 Thank you for considering these concerns.I feel we have already come a long way in reaching a good compromise in this situation.However,good solid planning is essential when it comes to new residential development.This planning must include solutions for the above mentioned issues.Once farmland is removed from agricultural use it is never returned.'Therefore careful and methodical planning is a must. Sincerely, T Kitnm hue Land Use Chairm an=irst Vice President Cc: Steve Lucas ATTACHMENT "3" _ LAND Of NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE.CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 February 18, 2000 i Barbara Vlamis, Executive Director Butte Environmental Council 116 W. Second Street, Suite 3 Chico, CA 95928 Re: Comments on Gridley Sphere of Influence Amendment Dear Ms. Vlamis: The Local Agency Formation Commission received your letter of February 2, 2000 which was presented to the Commission at the February 4, 2000 meeting by your representative. The Commission has actively considered your comments along with the testimony and written comments submitted by other affected agencies. Staff has been directed to prepare findings that address the many issues raised during the public hearing process and return the project for additional consideration at the March 2, 2000 meeting. In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines, Section 15151, the Commission is responsible to consider the following direction regarding "standards for adequacy of an EIR": CEQA Guidelines Section 15151: An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decision- makers with information which enables them to make a decision which intelligently takes account of environmental consequences. An evaluation of the environmental effects of a proposed project need not be exhaustive, but the sufficiency of an EIR is to be reviewed in the light of what is reasonably feasible. Disagreement among experts does not make an EIR inadequate, but the EIR should summarize the main points of disagreement among the experts. The courts have looked not for perfection, but for adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure. It should be clearly understood that the Commission is only considering an amendment to the Sphere of Influence and not specific annexation proposals or individual development projects. The primary purpose of the Sphere of Influence is to provide guidance for the location of future growth and establish the ability of the City to provide services to the proposed growth area. It is not the purpose of.the Sphere of Influence Plan to resolve all potential impacts of new development. In consideration of this statutory guidance, the following responses are offered to the issues you have raised. Transportation The Commission has considered the impacts related to the general circulation of traffic within the larger urban area. It is not the Commission's primary responsibility to enforce the Butte County General Plan, but rather to review the policies of all affected local agencies and make determinations resulting in the minimization of impacts in relationship to Commission actions. The FEIR provides mitigations (3.5-1,3.7-4) which require traffic impact analyses/studies for new discretionary development that address both internal traffic circulation as well as impacts on County roadways. The City General Plan Circulation Element further addresses traffic issues with specific policies. Policy B-10 establishes a standard of Level of Service "C" for local designated arterial streets, Level of Service "D" for intersections with designated local arterial streets, and Level of Service "E" for State Highway 99. Policy B-11 commits the City to providing $350,000 as its contribution to the Highway 99 improvement project that includes widening the Highway between Magnolia Street(East Gridley Road) and Spruce Street, installation of a continuous left-turn lane, and coordination of new and existing traffic signals, provided that the remaining funding is made available by other affected agencies. Infrastructure The Commission has applied considerable attention to the issue of drainage, both for this requested Sphere Amendment as well as past project deliberations. The primary issues are the effective protection of existing drainage facilities and the minimization of off-site drainage flows. In both cases, LAFCo recognizes that the City General Plan Public Facilities Element contains policies (Section 15, 1-6; Section 14, 1-5) that require all new development to either underground or fence open ditches, detain all post development storm water drainage, and provide a funding mechanism to maintain on-site facilities. Furthermore, LAFCo staff has recommended more stringent standards for drainage concerns including 100 year detention ponds with ten year out- flow, 50 ft. setbacks from canals/laterals and strict fencing requirements including regular maintenance. Additionally, the FEIR provides mitigations (3.3-1) for the detention of post development storm water run-off. It is suggested that excessive lands are being considered for inclusion into the Sphere of Influence. The Commission staff has significantly reduced the amount of land to be added to the Sphere while at the same time recommending the removal of existing lands further reducing the total developable acres. The resulting amended Sphere places a limited amount of land in large parcels into the five and ten year phases to promote the optimum efficiency in providing urban services while encouraging market-rate development. Reliance on small, scattered in-fill parcels with multiple owners does not provide for a reliable source of readily developable lands to meet growth projections and housing targets identified in the City General Plan Housing Element. Agriculture The conversion of agricultural lands is an unavoidable impact of urban expansion given the geographic location of the City of Gridley. The Commission has reviewed a variety of scenarios that would allow the City to achieve its growth targets for housing while minimizing the conversion of agricultural lands. Staff has recommended a significant reduction in the number of acres that the City had originally requested to be added to the Sphere. The original proposal by the City of Gridley proposed to add approximately 475 acres to the Sphere of the City. LAFCo staff has recommended the proposal be amended to add approximately 288 acres to the Sphere of Influence and remove approximately 171 acres from the existing SOI as shown on the map. The resulting net increase will be approximately 117 acres in the proposed amended SOI. The 2 additional lands are immediately adjacent to fully developed residential areas and represent a logical extension of services. The Commission has considered the proposed expansion of the Sphere with respect to the policies of the Butte County Agricultural Element. This consideration has resulted in the recommendation for a 300 ft. agricultural buffer and the protection of irrigation/reclamation facilities through permanent easements/setbacks, and the reduction of converted acreage. The Gridley General Plan has adopted policies that included buffers, clustering of development away from agricultural operations, the use of natural barriers between agricultural uses and development, right-to-farm statements, and the adoption of an agricultural overlay zone to be used for existing agricultural operations within City limits. Summary It is the Commission's responsibility to find a balance between the growth needs of the City of Gridley and the agricultural operations that surround the "island" City. A variety of policies have been adopted by the City of Gridley in the General Plan and are supported by the mitigation measures found in the EIR. Additionally, LAFCo has exercised its independent authority to significantly reduce the requested Sphere boundary to more accurately match the growth projections and necessary acres for sustainable growth. Tremendous effort has been applied to reaching a compromise solution that meets the needs of the City of Gridley, the Butte County Farm Bureau, the County of Butte, and the affected special districts. It is the Commission's role to facilitate responsible growth while minimizing impacts to urban services and the premature conversion of agricultural/open space lands. The project that is recommended by staff meets these goals and represents a blending of solutions to maximize parcel utility while minimizing collateral impacts. Sincerely, Paula Leasure Executive Officer cc: Carl Leverenz, LAFCo Chair Scott Browne, LAFCo Counsel Jo Sherman, City of Gridley K:ILAFCOIPROJECTS\GRID-SOI%BEC.WPD 3 i _. -.._-. . IN ®� • 1 - � 1 V1 Fsl�@� 1 � 1 I I I I •1 � --■■■■■■■■ � �ltl: r..� -� i ■C ,p—^^`,, t.�noueY.p��Bow.' II i_�_N]L -5- =.6 IISIIRIIw ill �r� � _ �_��, i �711II y �YYe■Y41u1 71 �7Y 6��i 64!�' 6� a • r•�T••-•.1�tL e�■il��illl/ JIQIII - � �::'i v'X71. •:� �r o�t�.1u` ' Fti••1 IS9 as#tli1111117 'li1QY1 e�.�• 1R y ya� a \\1i1101lIIrTi moan / 1 •' Gffi� ly'e�'G !i Z•,vu ,e�SIIIIIIAIIII IIea1 21 .lis d- _�� •' •i..,:.► 6:Ili! Cile�E�1�Aft,r .�..6 a q.�_ldisilr� iY..� NPIS 1fegii i ._�1ni�I�fl�!�i11�IQ ie:, •..�i�••l��me�`:• — .m R ; IYI e:/iil I ♦.0 n S ■SI IIi110i e1,1� F 4 F•ry �19 fs I ��I�� #I Iil S# LIi: =^'i-eY ow�l==a� ie!:�...•" 1 1178@IIA^ b r!® �� I i l��'.e�1, ON Gi#il+- ' n_ '�N p s�„<�4ws>n,uc ls1r.■ •°-1!,'- a SI I,Y rF �• �I 11111.7 0, l • 1 / a . 1 r �a�l'l7 ill 1 B ■ ''_ + ..._� Bnsum niir'•ii•uoua.: 1 #�II,RI�! �■eau:u au�ura n,u;w� ©Urllrll© _ - — ..�' usawl ennns Iesnn::,�- ©]IIlG114 1911£4]111!]11 += Ir �]Q��1�� ■ � 11�.��1711 @fart �� ° ��I '.i• EE .le■I �y�I1 ■lrrilr " �/ Bill!► i�fl� ll ;��#r Ilii WON ■i•!'i ■■■�fnIllC alU:r I ■■. 1 ® SIMmWIN MINUM �'' �'� � •IJ 1 �I 1 :1'1 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on Thursday, March 8, 2001, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following item: ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED 10:00 a.m. - Butte County Board of Supervisors, General Plan and Zoning Amendment in and around the City of Gridley to reflect changes made to the Sphere of Influence by LAFCo in April, 2000. The proposed changes are as follows: 1) Change the Land Use designation from Low Density Residential to Agricultural Residential and Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 140 acres located on the east side of Gridley between East Gridley Road and Sheldon Avenue; 2) Change the Land Use designation from Medium Density Residential to Agricultural Residential and Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 9.2 acres identified as APN 024-270-032; 3) Change the Land Use designation from Low Density Residential to Agricultural Residential on approximately 35 acres identified as APN 021-070-087 (ptn.) and APN 021-070-050; 4) Rezone from.SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 30 acres located immediately northwest of the Gridley Sphere of Influence; 5) Rezone from SR to SR-5 approximately 28 acres identified as APN 022-230-001 and 022-260-006; 6) Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 34 acres located within Gridley's Sphere of Influence on the south side of Yew Street and the west side of Oregon Street; 7) Rezone from SR-1 to SR-5 approximately 51 acres located within the Sphere of Influence, immediately adjacent to the city limits, on the southeast side of the city. Also amending the Gridley Urban Reserve diagram and policies in the Land Use Element of the Butte County General Plan to reflect the City's new Sphere of Influence. (CBS) (GPA 01-02) The above mentioned application,Initial Study, and map are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Development Services Department, Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. For information call: (530) 538-7601 (Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) Comments may be submitted in writing at any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. Upon action taken by the Planning Commission on the project an appeal may be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. The appeal period is 10 days. If you challenge the above application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION THOMAS A. PARILO, DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Gridley Herald on Friday, February 16, 2001. LEAD - IN SHEET FILE NO: PA Z Q - 2 AP# V GOO'JS APPLICANT: �Ua�l�lILU D -S ✓� ✓ Name Address OWNER: ✓1 oos Name Address RESPRESENTATIVE: Name Address REQUEST' ` REQ UEST: I 20 vie,✓►, 002 c 11�✓� l✓� Ao ,- Cc, I, Zov+, SIZE: �(Lc�X LOCATION: y- Gov\ ojA� e yle2 0 o G� d SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT # 4- EMSTING ZONING: VA.vle s &PrnRm))y ZONING HISTORY: SURROUNDING ZONING: Ci o Grp d� C-1 CT 2 - /- SURROUNDING LAND USE: UV v\ USIeS. orG�la rdS ,i v'V'I�CL4 j �.S+•ve SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: L-ow 1 Si s, Ra S,, at,"4-1 r. v +v V-4 F2-0-3 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: kAforms\lead-in COMMEN.1"DISTRIBUTION LIST .APPLICATION: DATE: County Offices and Cities: _ Chief Administrative Officer _X_ Develop.Services Director _X_ Public Works Director _X_ Environmental Health _X_ Assessor _ Building Manager Sheriff _ BCAG _ ALUC _X_ LAFCo Air Quality Mgmt. _ Butte Co.Farm Bureau Biggs Gridley _ Chico Oroville _ Paradise _ Chico Airport Commission _ Animal Control _X_ Agricultural Commission Irrigation District: Butte Water Biggs/W.Gridley Water _ Durham Irrigation _ OWID _ Paradise Irrigation _ Richvale Irrigation Table Mountain Irrigation _ Thermalito Irrigation _ Other Domestic Water Butte Water District _ California Water Service Co. _ Del Oro Water Co. OWID _ Themralito Irrigation District _ Other Sewer Butte Water District _ Themalito Irrigation _ Sterling City Sewer Main Skansen Subdivision(CSA 21) _ L.O.A.PUD Fire Protection _X_ California Department of Forestry _ EI Medio Fire Protection District Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Durham Area Recreation _ Feather River Rec.&Park Paradise Recreation&Park Richvale Recreation &Parks Utilities _ PG&E North-Chico _ Chambers Cable TV _ Pacific Bell PG&E South-Oroville _ Viacom Cable TV State Agencies CalTrans _ Dept.of Water Resources Dept.of Fish and Game Forestry(Attn:Craig Carter) _ Dept of Parks and Rec. Highway Patrol Central Reg.Water Quality Control Department of Conservation _ Off.of Mining Reclamation _ Off.of Governmental&Env.Relations Federal Agencies US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management Other Districts,Agencies,Committees,etc. Lime Saddle Dist _ Community Association _ Mosq.Abatement.Oroville/Butte Co Drainage _ Butte Env.l Council _ Paradise Pines Com. Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society _ Butte Co.Mining Committee _ _ it