Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGPA/RZ 00-04_PLANNING ;..4.11111111111 HE 111111111II111111N 1111111111111111.111111 , SEPARATORSHEET a,„ 70 _ 0 / 2 . oaoJERNUMBER ;f PROJECT SU�ti1�IA'iZY SHEET FILE#: GPA/RZ 00-04 PROJECT TYPE: General Plan Amendment and Rezone " APPLICANT: Harold Ball ADDRESS: 6846 W. Waverly, Redding, CA 96001 OWNER: Shirey Family Living Trust ADDRESS: 10675 Bryne Avenue, Los Molinos, CA 96055 REPRESENTATIVE: NorthStar Engineering ADDRESS: 20 Declaration Drive,Chico, CA 95973 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: General Plan Amendment from Orchard and Field Crops to Commercial and a Rezone from A-20(Agricultural-20 acre ap reel) to C-2(General Commercial) PROPERTY ZONED: A-20(Agricultural-20 acre parcel) LOCATED: on the west side of the Esplanade AP#: 006-690-012 &013 TOWN/AREA: Chico GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Orchard&Field Crops 1. Application complete: 3-15-00 Amount: S 3,496.00 Receipt#: 18258 2. Comments sent to: E.H.,LAF o,DDS.,Assessor,BCACT,Air Quality Mgmt.,Public Works,Butte Co. Farm Bureau, City of Chico, Ag. Commission,Calif. Water Service, CDF,&PG&E No -Chico. 3. Comments received from: 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 6. Assigned To: Dan Breedon 7. Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No: C gorical Exemption-CEQA# egative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Subject to Fish&Game: Environmental Impact Report Gen.Rule Ex. -CEQA# 15061.(bx3) Other 8. Staff Report: Project Video: 9. Clearinghouse circulation require//d: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: 10. Publication Notice Written: lV Display Ad Prepared: 11. Notices Mailed: Number of Notices: 12. Newspaper Publication Date: (O J O ( C 1 P G B 13. Planning Commission Hearin (s Action taken: Special Conditions: VU 0 Commission Resolution No. 14. Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: 15. Type Use Permit/Send for signature: 16. N.O.E./N.O.D./APPENDIX G: Fish&Game Fees Paid: Yes No 17. Send validated Use Permit: 18. Assessor's Memo: 19. Copy of Use Permit/Variance to Planning•Technician: Harold Ball,proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding environmental impacts,General Plan Amendment,and Rezone. General Plan Amendment from Orchard&Field Crops General Plan designation to a Commercial General Plan designation, and Rezone from A-20 (Agricultural, 20-acre parcels) to C-2 (General Commercial), on two 5-acre parcels. The property is located west of and adjacent to the Esplanade, approximately one-quarter mile southeast of Nord Highway, at 3395 Esplanade, Chico. APN 006-690-012 & 013.(DB) (File#GPA/RZ 00-04) Mr. Breedon said there was a letter from NorthStar asking this hearing be continued to a later date. He read the letter into the record. He said that Mr. Ball would like to look into a more specific plan for the property. The hearing was opened to the public. Rick Rodriguez,NorthStar Engineering, said the applicant wants to take a better look at what can be done with the property. He said he has no time line in mind. He discussed the possibility of the property being annexed to the City of Chico. Mr. Wilson said this hearing could be continued off the agenda and that staff would re-publish and re-notice the new hearing. Commissioner Mooney said he was concerned with people accusing the Commission of eliminating prime agricultural land from production. Commissioner Lambert asked if this could come back as anew project. Mr. Wilson said if this is brought back over a month from now, staff will re-notice the hearing. He said the City of Chico is willing to start talking about where they want to go with this property. He said agricultural lands are an issue in this County. Mr. Breedon said a Specific Plan and Development Agreement have been discussed with the applicant. Vice Chairman Nelson said this site is a viable orchard. Mr. Breedon said they have to look at all uses allowed in a commercial zone if this is approved. He said they also have to look at the Agricultural Element. It was moved by Commissioner Lambert, seconded by Commissioner Mooney, and unanimously carried to continue this hearing open, and to have the hearing re-noticed and re-published when it is ready to come back to the Commission. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ JULY 13,2000 ■ - I DEPARTANT OF DEVELOPM HJT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME(If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ADDRESS: CITY.STATE&ZIP CODE: FILE NUMB R: (FOR OFFICE US OD-� NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT(If any) _ _ ._ . `�, ti;�, TELEPHONE ' LOCATION OF PROJECT(Major cross streEts and Address, if any 3 3 315- ` GENERAL`INFORMATION REQUIRED y J r r OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE ,H/,PEr 6141Z y Z iV117, ,;•.<k:, ADDRESS: CITY•.STATE&ZIP CODE: 1,067J � *7, eltlel UZ�. Losi'1OLle'70S ?%=`7 ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE _ SITE SIZE(m Square Feet or Acres) ' e9-20 O Fs A`G E" vrqe4e 'T 10• D AG . =% PROPOSED STRUCTURES m Square Feet •EXISTING STRUCTURES (' Sq ) (Check One) (Check One) f'< ;>`•. ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER a . PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER P APPCA ON RE UESTED Q GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ REZONE ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ USE PERMIT RECEIVED ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP =` ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT MAR 1 5 2000 ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ VARIANCE ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ MINOR VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER �h PLANNING DIVISION ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ OTHER i PROJECT DESCRIPTION N FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT(Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division,describe the number and size of parcels.) :. ". OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHOR 17 AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER,I ACK, THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFOR,IWTION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE (If an agent is tq be authorized,execute an affidavit of authorization and inclu the affidavit with this application.) DATE: 3 �Y �0 SIGNATURE: _ AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; . Print Name ofAgent andThone Number ZocLr�,e9�7cYT' ��. ,�T�9�3 Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for 6-117M,644- AK's on my property, identified as Butte County Assessors Parcel Number 170W clzf 6- 01.,4 06 02- 145_F;-176 7'This authorization allows representation for all:applications,. -' hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s)relating to record title interest. 7�SSc Er Li�/��'G T.2v5T Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) THE BYP.9S5 1.2vSr; gH/,Q Print Name Print Name s Alzliu Signature Signature Architect and/or Engineer: r Print Name of ArchiteevEngineer and Phone Number Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date received: Total amount received: AP Number(s) Legal Description Owners Authorization Zoning requirements Projec�Descriptiori3:.� i.:�`>, , t Copies of.plot plan_.<; - ti Taken by Receipt No. �, •E:H._ r LD_ ,.Plan _ FD Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $ as of Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". DEPARTN`ENT OF DEVELOPMAT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME( If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: .IWWO 149" 0,5 e-6pD-0/z&0/3 ADDRESS: CITY.STATE&ZIP CODE: FILE N MBE (FOR OFFICE USE) Z DD'D NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT(If any TELEPHONE LOCATION OF PROJECT(Major cross streets and Address, if any j •GENERAL'INFORMATION REQUIRED OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS: CITY,STATE•&ZIP CODE /DTT �,QYl7E' A�/El1�J� /p5 �lDLlIlD,S , Cfl. 96�f'J ' ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SIIE SIZE(ut Square Feet or Acres) �4 20 O. E F.C.. .eESliJ�z'>'T��9G �; 1�A�91�"T /D.o r9c. '>r EXISTING STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) (Check One) (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER P ROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER - APPLICATION REQUESTED D ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ONE A�.; ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ USE PERMITf1 ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP [3 MINOR USE PERMIT tWjAR 15 2C�a [3BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ VARIANCE ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION BUTTE COLNTY ❑ MINOR VARIANCEpLp,NNING DIVISION ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIP'T'ION OF PROPOSED PROJECT(Attach necessary sheets. If ttus application is for a land division,describe the number and size of parcels.) ,4 1e6Z4,k7z_ /5 1Q,9 eq ZD 720 C;Z OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AIM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHOR=AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER,I ACKNOWLEDGE THI FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an age is to be authorized,execute an affidavit of authorization and' lu the affidavit with this appy onJ DATE: x 3 7$; per SIGNATURE: AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; ' (/O�i/T�.t`.e L!vICJ`!/ CIG" , � 'WJ��O(/C� . . ., .. a' c ., . •. '`Piirit Name of Agent and Phdne Number " Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for on my property, identified as Butte County Assessors Parcel Number : �/Yocv 06•-eC9- aiz � ��,3 - GM-OZ-175-4=176 : This authorization allows representation•for all applications, hearings,appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including' documerit:(s) relating to record title interest:,,,, 711,5 8Y/PH3_4 7T 4!J T, irG 7;Cvsr Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) X03 �• sy/,ear; Print Name Print Name Signature Signature Architect and/or Engineer: Print Name of Architeat/Engineer and Phone Number Mailing Address J n FOR"OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date received: Total amount received: AP Number(s) Legal Description Owners Authorization Zoning requirements Project Description Copies.of plot plan Taken by Receipt No' E.H. LD Plan -` FD Payment-of-the•currently-required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any.unused.portion_of_a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $ as of Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". RECEIVED MAO 15 2000 COUNTY OF BUTTE BUTTE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORMANNING DIVISION (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Fled General Information: 1. Name and address of owner,and/or developer,and/or project sponsor. y9�9 ,�,9�L Q5�6 u/. lri,9yE,2LY .�E�liirGi C.9 ,96mi 2. Address of project 331T DS.�LAI�fl.�� Assessor's Parcel Number. 6,0'O/Z G— D/3 3. Name,address,and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project . 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project,including those required by city, regional,state and federal agencles: "Z4'4-1 C GEnE.fL l'G�'c9r'JEI��✓C/�T 5. E:dsdng general plan designation: 6. Ebsting zoning district 7. How is land currently used? 8. Proposed use of site (Project-for which this form is filed): CD�� /ffG Project Description: ! 9. Site size: A9.00 An (Acres/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: Compact Total: 11. Plans attached Yes No 12. Proposed development schedule n/A 13. Associated projects lJ/fl 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development�/il 0 9utte county Depactment of Development secvices a Planning Division 0 1 Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. _• If residential,include the number of units,schedule of unit sizes,range of sale prices or rents,and type of. household size expected. 114 16. if commercial, indicate the type,whether neighborhood,city or regionally oriented,square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 6,&7 4j(, 17. If industrial,indicate type, estimated employment per shift,and loading facilities. /r�� 18. If institutional,indicate the major function,estimated employment per shift,estimated occupancy,loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project �y�q 19. If the project involves a variance,conditional use, rezoning applicatlon,or any development permits,state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. if permits have already been Issued,please attach as Exhibit 5 i4TlAlf/�J�lIT Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. ✓ 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential �. areas or public lands or roads. .22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project ✓ — 46 m CD 'JE.2Cl•9L 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. _ 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _ ✓ 25. Change in bay, lake, river,stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. _ ✓ 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. _ ✓ 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, ✓ such as tobc substances,flammable or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal-services ✓ (police, fire,water, sewage, etc. including special districts). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. _ ✓� O Butte County Cepactment of Oevelopment Secvlcea 0 Planning Division 0 2 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project,Including information on topography,soil stability, plants and animals,and any cultural,historical,or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 0�2C/li9Ae9 wl1 33. Describe the surrounding properties,including Information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical,or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses,shops,department stores,etc),and scale of development(height, frontage,set-back,rear yard,etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 4 �gE % , f/ j� UT Certification 401"EAE!C01-, I hereby certify that the statements fumished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this Initial evaluation to the best of my ability,and that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signature for 3119oo K:\FORMS\ENV-INFO 0 Butte county Department of Development Services 0 planning Dlvislon 0 3 RECEIVED MAR 15 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION REZONE & GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR BALL Environmental Questionnaire Item#19: A rezone is being requested to C-2 (General Commercial) from A-20 (Agricultural—20 acre minimum). A General Plan Amendment is being requested to Commercial from Orchard & Field Crops. Exhibit "A" Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED MAR 15 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Whom It May Concern; I, BOB G. SHIREY, Trustee of the.BYPASS TRUST, SHIREY FAMILY TRUST, dated April 13, 1994, as owner of that certain real property known as A.P. 06-02 175 & 176 and located on The Esplanade, Chico, do hereby authorize Harold Ball, 6846 W. Waverly, Redding, California and NorthStar Engineering, 20 Declaration Drive, Chico, California to process the Rezone Application and General Plan Amendment Application and -to act as my agent for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. BYPASS TRUST SHIREY FAMILY TRUST dated April 13, 1994 Name: Bob G. Shirey Title: Trustee =E6. -28' Op 110\I 15 _•4 CUSTOMER SERVICE TEL 530 893 1855 r. uL) WEEK RECORDED RETURN M NZIL A.HAWS Awn fs Imo.► 1530 Rumba&ltd..Saila 1 - 01M csuraIVAa"M MAIL TAR STATUdaU '8 M 97-00�34E7I c IC �'� is 0000 Recorded I Cheoli 10.00 11a(1t1 Official Records 1 16175 orm County of i l LAD a6oitW%CA!IBES Butte 1 Caudece J. Grubbs I �. A1'N 10064126-17*0864211-M Recorder i I IOi1J�1T1 201po 6-liar-97 1 PUD. X1 2 ! I PWM)UAL QUTM" DEED v no Is lvwbrw&dm )t THIS Is k COURT OJW-93 *'CONVEYANCE Deaf udw7 trasds•tfa`S NOINZ OR DEC UM THAT IS NOT PVRS'UANi TO ()Camputsd an to vales of pfCPO t7 emrered,or . SALE (RAT 11911) O Compared on&D plus ho value at Rene A. eummbmacen rfmaloiq at dmf of fab. O unhuc ver"area O cuy of .a" FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acimowledged. n7 - BOB G. SHIREY and RITA J. SHIREY Trustees of the SHIREY FAMILY LTVING TRUST dated April 13, 1994 hereby. RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to { BOB O. SHTREY. Trustee of the THE BYPASS TRUST. SHIREY FAMILY LIVING TRUST, dated April 13. 1994 All right, title and interest in and to that certain real property situate in County of Butte, State of Califomia, described as follows: f PARCEL 1,as shown on that certain parcel map, recorded in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Bune. State of California, on October 15, 1973, in Book 48 of Maps, at page(s) 12. :'E B. -28' OOl-%10--%:1 1.5 '5 CUSTOMER SERVICE OJ 97 - 08427 isolo .. . Duo: .3—3— im i t , RITA J. SHIRE y BO F Putman to Tehama County Superior Cotta Order Number 12279 imied oa July 22. 1996 BO. SHIREY Trustee t . 1 i ACKNOWLEDGMENT Stirs of California - ) as _..-:•.r,_^^: County of Butte ) - On 1997,before me, the undersigned,a Notary Public in artd foe laid State, personally appeared BOB G. SI-IIREY. (7n penonally known to me()or proved to ttte oo the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/am sub=' to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the sante in his/her/their authorized capadty(les), and that by his/her/their signature on the instrument the persons)or the entity upon behalf of which the persons)acted, executed the instr urleaL SUSAN FdlllfR t::"'•" . WTTNFSS my band and official seal. Cafim./t 111081 �o )wm Crwrr w Cr. E+rw Ore.71.)000 Signature REZONE RECEIVED MAR 15 2000 APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their application packet. Please include this checklist along with you submittal. Applicant Planner 1. Er E3 A completed, signed, Uniform Application and Environmental Information form. If the application is signed by an agent for the property owner, an agent authorization form must be submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. 2. IJ �If the rezone involves more than one parcel, a petition signed by a minimum of 60% of the owners of the parcels affected, must be submitted. 3. Z� 1?1�A Copy of the Grant Deed, a map of property showing the precise boundaries and/or a legal description. 4. [a'-' Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of the deposit will be returned upon final action, if any remains). (Plannner advises applicant) 5. ff"Thirty-five (35) copies of plans which shall include a detailed site plan drawn to scale. All plans shall be drawn on uniform size sheets no greater than 24" X 36". The finished plans shall be folded to 8 1/2" x 11". The detailed site plan must include: a. Name and address of Applicant, Engineer and/or Architect b. Ef L"J Assessor Parcel Number(s) and the street address. c. a [ Property lines, lot dimensions, city and special district boundaries (if applicable), existing general plan and zoning designations for the property and within 100 feet of the boundaries of the property. d. 2- LJ Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvements on the property (including,but not limited to,buildings, driveways, parking areas, wells, septic tanks and leach fields). For vacant property, or in other circumstances,this requirement may IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED,THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. I be�waived by the Director of Development Services or the Director's designee. Waved LJ YES ❑ NO e. For vacant or substantially undeveloped land, show contours as per USGS maps or better. f. lJ Distances from any significant natural and man-made features of the property, such as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major tree stands, storm drains, bodies of water, railroads, to the property lines. g. North arrow and scale of drawing. All plans shall be drawn to an engineering scale with the preferred scale of 1" =20',with a north arrow preferably oriented to the ton of sheet. h. Vicinity Map I. la�' ❑ All plans must be clear and legible. 6. ne copy o an x ransp y-Teduction of the detailed site plan. Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. Signature: Date: / D� Applicant/Re esentative Signature: Date: !�Z Zd zoy PXWning Receiving Application K:\forms\subrnital\rezone.frrn IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED,THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 2 RECEIVED MAR 15 2000 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT • BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION' APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST The following items are required to be submitted at the time of application: Applicant Planner 1. L'_1 LJ A completed,signed,Uniform Application and Environmental information form. If the application P tm PP is signed by an agent for the property owner, an agent authorization form must be submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. 2. Z"" 5 A complete, signed Environmental Information Form. 3. IRr"' Please be advised that public General Plan Amendments are heard twice a year; once in April and once in October. The deadline for submittal for April is September 30th. The deadline for submittal for October is March 31st. If an Environmental Impact Report is required, more review time will be needed. (Planner advises applicant) 4. L'I LJ If the General Plan Amendment involves more than one parcel, a petition signed by a minimum of 60% of the owners of the parcels affected, must be submitted. 5. UK ErA Copy of the Grant Deed, a map of property showing the precise boundaries and/or a legal description. 6. 2 a Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of the deposit will be returned upon final action, if any remains). (Planner advises applicant) 7. LJ Thirty-five(35) copies of plans which shall include a detailed site plan drawn to scale. All plans shall be drawn on uniform size sheets no g er ater than 24" X 36". The finished plans shall be folded to 8 1/2" x 11". The detailed plan must include: a. E300' L"J Name and address of Applicant, Engineer and/or Surveyor b. I 2� Assessor Parcel Number(s)and the street address. c. P� 0 Property lines, lot dimensions, city and special district boundaries (if applicable), existing 14/pr general plan and zoning designations for the property which are within 100 feet of the boundaries of the property. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED,THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 1 d. ❑ Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvements on the property(including, NI� but not limited.to,buildings, driveways,parking areas, wells, septic tanks and leach fields). For vacant property, or in other circumstances, this requirement may be wa ived by the Director of Development Services or the Director's designee. Waves ❑ NO e. Er 13*� For vacant or substantially undeveloped land show contours as per USGS maps or better. f. Er zr Distances from any significant natural and constructed features of the property, such as streets, access roads, streams,rock outcroppings,major tree stands, storm drains,bodies of water,railroads,to the property lines. g. L North arrow and scale of drawing. All plans shall be drawn to an engineering scale with a Iv preferred scale of 1" =20', with a north arrow preferably oriented to the top of sheet. sckk, m/ �� m/,+h. E ET" Vicinity map. I. L'J EK All plans must be clear and legible. 8. One copy of an 8 1/2" x 11" transparency reduction of the detailed site plan. q0- Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. Signature: Date: Applicant/Repres tative Signature: ^'! Date: P11Wming Receiving Application IF INSUFFICIENT NFORMATION IS SUBMITTED,THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 2 " r • i PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST Project Planners fill out this in-house checklist upon receipt of a new project. Project Number: Project/Application Name: Project Site Zoning: General Plan Designation: APN: Project Planner: Date completed: Is the project located within any of the following areas? ❑ North Chico Specific Plan ❑ Oroville Enterprise Zone ❑ Williamson Act Land CLCA: ACRES: ❑ 100 Year Flood Plain ❑ Within FEMA Floodway ❑ Within DWR Floodway ❑ Dam Inundation Area ❑ Watershed Protection Overlay Zone ❑ East Avenue Specific Plan ❑ Chico Area Greenline (Project in area where Greenline policies apply) ❑ Greater Chico Area Redevelopment Area ❑ Nitrate Action Plan Area ❑ Archaeological Sensitive Area ' ❑ Hazardous Site ❑ Other Critical of Sensitive Area ❑ Planning Areas ❑ Urban Reserve ❑ Durham-Dayton-Nelson Planning Area ❑ Paradise Urban Reserve ❑ Oroville Area Land Use Plan(Adopted 3/29/84) ❑ Oroville Urban Reserve ❑ Chico Area Land Use Plan(Adopted 3/18/90) ❑ Chico Urban Reserve ❑ Gridley-Biggs Land Use Plan(Adopted 8/586) ❑ Gridley Urban Reserve ❑ Honcut Area ❑ Cohasset Area ❑ Palermo Area ❑ Chapman/Mulberry Planning Area(in process of adoption 9-14-99) ❑ Deer Herd Areas ❑ Designated Development Zone ❑ Winter Range ❑ Critical Winter Range ❑ Summer Range ❑ Critical Summer Range ❑ Major Migration Corridor ❑ Intermediate Deer Range ❑ If Constrained, The Minimum Parcel Size Is acres. ❑ CLUP Area ❑ AIRPORT AREA OF INFLUENCE ❑ Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan ❑ Chico ❑ Paradise Skypark ❑ Paradise Skypark ❑ Ranchero ❑ Ranchero ❑ Oroville ❑ Oroville ❑ Airport Land Use Commission Review(ALUC) Required ❑ Urban Area(As defined in Improvement Standards for Chapter 20) ❑ City of Chico ❑ Durham ❑ City of Gridley ❑ City of Oroville ❑ Mountain Recreational Area ❑ Sphere of Influence ' ❑ City of Chico ❑ City of Gridley ❑ City of Oroville ❑ City of Biggs ❑ City of Paradise ❑ Watershed Areas ❑ Butte Creek ❑ Cherokee ❑ Big Chico Creek ❑ Wyman Ravine Study Area ❑ Little Chico Creek ❑ Rock Creek Study Area ❑ Sacramento River Conservation(SB1086) Essential Services ❑ Public Water District ❑ Well(s) ❑ Public Sewer District ❑ On-site Sewer If well and/or on-site sewage disposal,has Environmental Health determined the application filing requirements? ❑ Pre-application review complete ❑ Pre-application review not required ❑ Drainage District/CSA ❑ Fire District ❑ Butte County ❑ El Medio Fire District ❑ Federal Aid Road(s) ❑ Other Permits required from other agencies Agency Special Review ❑ Department of Water Resources'(DWR) ❑ Office of Mine Reclamation ❑ Department of Fish and Game (DFG) ❑ Department of Fish and Game ❑ CALTRANS ❑ HCD (Mobile Home Parks) ❑ Regional Water Quality Control Board ❑ Other ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Butte County Air Quality Control District ❑ Other Comments: Version:9/28/99 CAMy DocumentsTROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST.doc AP #006-690-012 AP#006-690-004 AP#006-190-021 SHIRLEY FAMILY LIVING TRUST BRUM 3AUGH RAY&EVELYN ARROYO ENTERPRISES INC. BALL HAROLD P.O. BOX 234 C/O EVERETT L. 6846 W. WAVERLY CHICO, CA. 95927 510 WALNUT ST. BEDDING, CA 96061 CHICO, CA. 95926 AP #006-190-021 AP#006-220-014 AP#006-690-010 GRISSOM DALE DEAN CHICO AREA REC. &PARK DIST. DAVIS ORAN W. ESTATE ETAL �&LINDA MARIE ETA C/O BILL KEHOE C/O NANCY HOTCHKISS ESQ. 198 INNSBROOK WY. 545 VALLOMBROSA AVE. 701 UNIVERSITY AVE. STE. 200 CHICO, CA 95973 CHICO, CA 95926. SACRAMENTO, CA 95625-6700 AP#006-220-009 AP#006-190-010 AP#006-190-011 CHICO UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. NELLA ENTRPRISES INC. GROSS RICHARD 1163 EAST 7TH STREET 1001 CARLOS PL 115 GURNSEY AVE. CHICO, CA 95926 CHICO, CA 95926 RED BLUFF, CA 96080 AP #006-190-021 AP#006-190-036 AP#006-190-037 EVERETT LEWIS JR&MARILYN CROWDER WILLIAM LEE& PARKER ROBERT F 2165 NORD AVE STE 10 CATHRYN LEE TRUST 198 INNSBROOK WAY CHICO, CA 95926 4216 SHORTHORN DR. CHICO CA 95973 CHICO, CA 95973 AP#006-680-009 AP#006-680-013 AP#800-046-220 SCHILL DEVELOPMENT LIMITED VALENZUELA RUBEN LORKE INSULATION CO INC. PARTNERSHIP 3418 ESPLANADE P.O. BOX 7927 P.O. BOX 122 CHICO, CA 95973 CHICO, CA 95927 CHICO, CA 95927 AP #006-680-010 SHASTA UNION SCHOOL DIST 169 LEORA CT CHICO, CA 95926 �I I APPLICATION ACTIVITY LOG Action* Person Contacted** Phone Number** Time Spent/Date *Use more than one line if necessary. **If applicable. APPLICATION ACTIVITY LOG ,y All COUNTY OF BUTTE LP Oroville, California GENERAL CLAIMS CLAIMANT: NorthStar Engineering ADDRESS: 20 Declaration Drive .eW CITY & STATE: Chico CA 95973 DATE OF CLAIM: November 20, 2000 IMPORTANT.' SEE INSTRUCTIONS SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES CNF EVERSES®E DATE DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY AMOUNT 11-20-00 Refund of Remaining Fees for GPA/REZ 00-04 $1,879: 50 TOTAL $1,879. 50 I,the undersigned,declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered,and that this claim is true and correct:�Pday !�► Dated this of 201 ,at Cn/ Calif. I,the undersigned,hereby certify that,to the best of my knowledge,the services or articles specified above have been performed or delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriation( I or Specific Board Approval[ J(Check one)for the same. Dated this L7 r� day of N°y `'6 20 ,at d Ae�We Calif. ` De artment eaHr Authorized De ut Dept.Code____480-001 Ex .Code 4210900 PAYABLE FROM General FUND DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-AUDITOR'S USE ONLY DEPT.&SUB. PROJ. SUB.OBJ. CLAIM NO. INV.NO. INV.DATE ENCUMB. GROSS AMT. r i Date 11/27/00 •Development Services Depaoiment Time 2 :40 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 1 GPA/REZ 00-04 * Harold Ball 6846 W. Waverly Redding, CA 96001 In reference to : GPA/REZ 00-04 Rounding : None Full Precision : No Last bill Last charge 08/04/00 Last payment / / Amount $0 . 00 Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TOTAL 03/20/00 Paula A. / C 1 . 00 34 . 00 #29022 Clerical 34 . 00 03/20/00 Larry P. / P 1 . 25 73 . 75 #29131 Processing 59 . 00 03/20/00 Tammie P. / C 2 . 00 68 . 00 #29141 Clerical 34 . 00 04/03/00 Steve L. / LR 0 . 25 14 . 75 #29370 . LAFCo Review 59 . 00 05/01/00 Dan B.. / P 1 . 00 59 . 00 #29853 Processing 59 . 00 06/12/00 Lynn R. / C 0 . 50 22 . 50 #30734 Clerical 45 . 00 06/12/00 Dan B. / P 7 . 75 457 . 25 #30758 Processing 59 . 00 06/24/00 Larry P. / P 0 . 50 29 . 50 #30900 Processing 59 . 00 06/26/00 Dan B. / P 5 . 50 324 . 50 #30923 Processing 59 . 00 07/10/00 Lynn R. / C 0 . 50 22 . 50 #31158 Clerical 45 . 00 07/24/00 Dan B. / P 0 . 25 14 . 75 #31436 Processing 59 . 00 Date 11/27/00 •Development Services DepaAent Time 2 :40 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 2 GPA/REZ 0.0-04 * :Harold Ball (continued) TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES 20 . 50 $1, 120 . 50 TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS $0 . 00 TOTAL NEW CHARGES $1, 120 . 50 PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 03/10/00 Deposit - Receipt #18258 (3 , 000 . 00) 11/27/00 Refund/Claim Form to Auditor 1, 879 . 50 TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS ($1, 120 . 50) NEW BALANCE TOTAL NEW BALANCE $0 . 00 LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 { TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buffecounty.net November 20, 2000 NorthStar Engineering Attn: Rick Rodriguez 20 Declaration Drive Chico, CA 95973 RE: Withdrawal Request for General Plan Amendment&Rezone File No. GPA/REZ 00-04 Dear Mr. Rodriguez: We have received your request for a withdrawal of the above-referenced project. The total application fee is $3,496.00, of which $260.00 is disbursed to Environmental Health, $150.00 to Land Development and $86.00 to Butte County Fire Department/CDF. The amount received on account to Planning is $3,000.00. Of the$3,000.00 received by Planning,$1,120.50 has been used in the processing of your application. The remaining amount of$1,879.50 will be refunded to you. Please sign the enclosed claim form and return it to this office. Once we receive the signed claim form, we will process your refund. If you have any questions,please contact Brian Larsen in this office between the hours of 8:00 a.m.and 4:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services TAP:jb Enclosure j:\docs\refunds\withdraw NorthStar ENGINEERING Civil Engineers•Planners•Surveyors Please...6;faen OUTING ❑ e dle &REQWs�TNovember 16, 2000To: ❑Approve County of Butte And... PLANNING DIVISION ❑Forward 7 County Center Drive ❑Return / Oroville, CA 95969 ❑Keep or Recycle C� Attention : Dan Breedon ❑Review with Me POS r.; _ — From: Re: General Plan Amendment&Rezonl ossa©3M,sss 01 - Date: 'l Dear Dan, On behalf of our client, we request that said GPA & Rezone application be withdrawn--_ from consideration by the Planning Commission. We feel it best at this time to postpone until a specific development plan for this property and the surrounding area is prepared and adopted by the City of Chico and the County of Butte. In conjunction with this request we ask for a.refund of the processing fees that were paid for by Mr. Ball. Please;call this office if you have any questions. Sincerely; NORTHHSTAR ENGINEERING Rick Rodriguez RECEIVED 20 DECLARATION DRIVE CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 NOV' 16 2000 530-893-1600 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION FAX-893-2113 OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA Eutte .eauftt LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION r.,y.. :w; .•.. r<` DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 August 1, 2000 Harold Ball 6846 West Waverly Redding, CA 96001 Re: General Plan Amendment and Rezone, APN 006-690-012 & 013,File#GPA/RZ 00-04 Dear Mr. Ball: Enclosed please find copies of the comments we have received from other Butte County agencies regarding your application for a General Plan Amendment and Rezone. Please review these comments and the conditions that are requested as part of the project's approval. Should you have any further questions regarding these comments,please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday-through Friday. an Breedon Senior Planner encl. cc: NorthStar Engineering, 20 Declaration Drive, Chico, CA 95973 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 411 Main Street C P.O. Box 3420T Chico, CA 95927 ���E 1 ,KJ Vv sD (530) 895-4845 FAX(530) 895-4726 JUL 1 1 2000 ATSS 459-4893 July 7, 2000 PLANNING DIMSION Mr. Daniel Breedon, Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 RE: Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone (GPA/RZ 00-04) - City of Chico Community Development Department Comments on Initial Study Dear Mr: Breedon: The Chico Planning Division has completed its review of the initial study for the Harold Ball general plan amendment and rezone and wishes to provide the following comments: Category 8, Hydrology and Water Quality: According to the Butte County/City of Chico Nitrate Action Plan, a portion of the project is within (and the remainder is surrounded by) Nitrate Plan Area "C"- "Land within the City of Chico Sphere of Influence, outside the Sewer Service Area of the City of Chico but proposed for future sewer service." Section 4.b.(2) of the. Nitrate Action Plan limits density to three or fewer"units" per acre in Area "C". Sections 4.c. (1-6) establish additional conditions that must be met prior to approving "interim development" within Area "C". The Butte County- commercial general plan designation does not appear to establish a maximum density. The potential therefore exists that interim development allowed by the proposed general plan and rezone will not be'consistent with the nitrate action plan, and may result in a further degradation of ground water quality in the area. We recommend that Initial Study categories 8a&8f be marked as "less than significant with mitigation incorporated", and that mitigation consist of a limitation on the allowed number of units per acre and/or intensity of commercial use and compliance with Sections 4.c.(1-6) as required in the Nitrate Action Plan. Category 15, Transportation/Traffic: The initial study indicates that traffic impacts will be less than significant. As indicated in,initial study Section 9 (part "a", paragraph 1), the City has indicated that there are problems with traffic circulation in the project area that may be worsened by the further incremental development proposed in the general plan amendment and rezone. U:\Haro1dBa111SReview.wpd g�� Made From Recycled Paper C i JUL MUOU S rr ���1�1T1T.�6?YCiL?A•r` City of Chico Comments on Harold Ball GPA/RZ July 7, 2000 Page 2 We believe that a determination of no significant impact on transportation/traffic is premature until potential traffic impacts are assessed and an overall traffic circulation plan is developed for the area. Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the initial study. Please feel free to give me a call if you have questions or wish to discuss our comments on this project. Sincerely, Steve Zalusky Senior Planner I U:\HaroldBaIIISReview.wpd �d 7 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Public Works FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Harold Ball,GPA/RZ 00-04 DATE: March 21,2000 CONTACT PERSON:DArl b(e'e8OrN The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project.and submit conditions,if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should.be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed,please ca11538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a General Plan Amendment from Orchard and Field Crops to Commercial and a Rezone from A-20(Agricultural-20 acre parcel)to - (General Commercial)on property zoned A-20(Agricultural-20 acreap rcell located on the west side of the Esplanade,identified as APN 006-690-012&013. Supervisorial District No.2. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON July 13,2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN April 4, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. CO�vIlvI�N�S(Aott�ach additional pages if necessary): �1((!!W''''�vn ski( % u� u, ins �'v.� 71. By: Date: 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 959 0C I E 530-53JRECEIVED JUN 2 9-2000 MAR 2 1 2000 COUNTY OF BUTTE BUTTE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT DIV. PLANNING DIVISION BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION PRELIMINARY GPA POLICY REVIEW HEARING Purpose To provide applicants with General Plan Amendment projects and other legislative approvals, a public forum for evaluating their proposals against current land use policies in advance of the formal review process. The information gathered from the process would alert the applicant to potential conflicts prior to the potentially costly and time consuming public review process. The review would guide the applicant in making revisions to the project in order to conform to the policies. For purposes of this procedure, a formal General Plan Amendment (GPA) application must be filed. Scope of Review The Policy Review Hearing shall be voluntary on the part of the applicant. The hearing will be limited in its scope of review to focus on general plan land use policy direction and will not consider specific zoning distinctions or project specific design criteria. Public Notice Requirements and Meeting Schedule The Policy Review Hearing will be noticed in the same manner as a General Plan Amendment. The notice shall state purpose of the hearing and that the only formal action that can be taken is to deny the request. All hearings will be open to the public and public testimony will be invited and considered. The hearing shall be held as part of a regularly scheduled Planning Commission agenda. Environmental Review Since a decision to approve a GPA can not occur, the proposals submitted are not considered projects under the California Environmental Quality Act and as such, no formal environmental review is required for this process. Scheduling Applications for the Policy Review Hearing will be accepted on any business day and processing will commence when the application is determined complete. The Planning Division will schedule a hearing date within 60 days of the completeness determination. . The Planning Commission will render a decision within 30 days of the Policy Review Hearing. Application Process 2 1. Project proponents will submit their request to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division. Planning staff will then review the application for completeness and identify any areas that require additional information. If necessary, staff may meet and confer with the applicant before commencing a review and analysis. 2. Staff review will consist of an analysis of existing general plan designations.and policies, the existing geographic profile of the area, the level of alteration to existing plans, and possible alternative policies needed to accommodate the proposal. Comments strictly related to county policy issues will be requested from appropriate County departments, special districts, and other responsible agencies. 3. Staff will set a hearing date for the proposal and prepare a report for the Commission presenting the above analysis and offering recommendations on the appropriateness of proceeding with the proposal as a formal project application. Staff may recommend denial of the GPA or recommend revisions needed to bring it into conformity with the General Plan. 4. The Commission will vote on the proposal by either finding that it is a reasonable request and in the current general best interest of the county, or, find that alternatives. or modifications to the request may be feasible, or, find that the proposal is not appropriate pursuant to existing land use policy/direction and is not in the current best interest of the County. This latter finding will result in a denial of the GPA. 5. If the applicant is dissatisfied with the action of the Planning Commission he/she may appeal the recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. Submittal Requirements The applicant shall submit a General Plan Amendment application, a conceptual land use design map and/or written description of the proposal as appropriate. Application Information The application shall include: Identification of ownership and written consent. A brief written description of the proposed land use requested utilizing existing general plan terminology (e.g. commercial, industrial, residential, etc.). The total acreage and number of residential units or intensity of non-residential uses to be included. 3 An area wide geographic profile that briefly discusses the topographic variables, infrastructure and an existing land use inventory and the project's potential impact. A review of existing GP policies that support the request and/or policies that conflict with the request and.needing revision. A justification for the proposal based on sound reasoning that clearly indicates the land use, economic, environmental or other benefits from the requested policy direction. Fees The same fee required for a General Plan Amendment shall be filed with this application. Fifty percent of those fees shall be credited to the continued processing of the formal application if a formal completed application is filed within six months of the final direction from the Planning Commission or Board of Supervisors. Summary The Policy Review Hearing will allow persons who are interested in land use proposals that will have the potential to significantly alter existing county land use policy, the opportunity to receive a preliminary indication as to the acceptability of such proposals. The Policy Review Hearing process is a voluntary process and will not legally bind the County to ultimately approve a future project. i k:\planning\projects\plancom2.prh � ' 11• .• 1 1 1 tiYJ.�'yk;?;�G?y}}y�-:'•rr :� `�'Jli+: } fr> ,n!C:`.:.ii:F�iF'i';:%iin•Y„• �'��y}:3: + `ko-f�+:. {. :'F:•::}:y:}rl;tury+,�' •I{kYt„#yf',p. t. }!�r� :t;�:i'•'+u•S.y}::tt•L {i{}SS;4}Y`ti.Y'•iia�kt+}G ,' F};;;:f•::r},a.., ;fs>. �$?'r,jj.'trr•};ti::�� •CKY. ,fin �::+,•.:}:•.}•'?%;}.. r. �'"''i`'yi \ r�}{.::�� Get} \} :>.i•iCv��: ""%✓ ;t%xj'�?fir.' :iY_�'?.fr{l••f�:;';?�:}'�,.,tiyk4•�• �^ � ' \. ! +�C•'`,'�;iirsy`}ri...,.}•{r•+,�.`.irF:f,�'4`;a'%i:;ri;:;{},'n• ,{+•:4t>y}'"•:•`'f:;s?'Ct:;t'trj{V>t.#sj' ig°' off• 'h�� {r �,.., �� X. +fixx x;*}:' 'k' ;•4�°,,s`',:�::,x.: -- } -?..... .......}{; }} K,`'<::;i.'{ ::Vii;:%<":;;:`.•�:;>.' r$j si` ti 4>.:. Y c'•F:}.;;?;+{ ."•'%.;:ly•4{Y{:£{::pnk }y;;:,..{ti }vy•..}:'}.v}.v,%C,,:.,.v.. :..i4 : •v r;... r•;o;}fs{..:;}:,{ 3}>":`} ,.•}`k?.y .'i.°`i "'{.:,ur ;::.••{}+$Ab};rf}..,{{•}>4`u,•ys?;<4+.::•i S rr;?:,,ir.:{;`F}+r'v%';,�.•7,V"k:s•:•.,r}.�}f ?—l. �'a'r� '%: %`Si fjf:f r ti r/{}.}{}}1xPf}�•' ?ff;.'•?kY�'`:% ?`4`' �'' �?"�4��,',i`i1`�•,;f'4'S:`:;:;r iv f;%.}.'+;t:�;•#{?k -" '��.:.; }. r•do-;;:G;%1w.:17^'/.sg,-'�,•::> :�;}:;y: 1:.f:.:,k.,,{,;.,:>ti;:•}?; { -02M.,`{.4,"'•:r?k{• .? 3 k4>:::ig r'r,.'+• ::. {{ i�j:r. i r %.i! v%,,�,{::Y'�''. ts::;- .•>:':via: .'.' •k�$•`?ryk%?o:;•s'� ...::{#}r S t:fy :.�;: '�r:y}•:y7,`•i`}'Q'�,d. s}:.,;y.•>:: �3'`;�1 i��,'ro :}•k::k}: :''•rij i'r,'••.:..:#k:#3i'' ?i>Y`fd�.}':;v.g t:; j,}'';'! ., 'r¢.`:.:a•/yf,i:!:,•• %< .•ati ?i`,{�•k}FR';f v'ti.��/„{,{.,. yoji�`,•i#`s..}}{'f/6 ri.•f,/.;::.}:•4r::•:�4ti r.;1.,kk:.: •:t>}: }y•.,}}�:.•.,:• 'k�'N}+S•kkkr~:;t�:{,{{.{,y,t;..;,.>. ?Ss}k�;}.�s,,.}.;:;;:j•}k.<;r:�? •x�%;����i:.> !wR•:tk}'t'. •�j�•'•#;%2;#}t;{:}}: .3*.�:•. .#i<F�;:ki:?dv?kf'•'r�:ryi#$'>ff�'+�,+�%k'j2}��R`c�:Y;i%f f':x;�:;tt.`.#:�;t:: ii. is%?y#i:'; :r}#:S i>.S':i i k ;•}�i4tiy;yt;?h :$-• �:^,••s•�.,{?r;ci;•i?,� � .;-.: a•�.••t:;}}Y..,.,:{::.. :<':i k{;#.,; .a E:Y•: :: ji i-:y,.,:r.:}}}? `:"'}i:ir+i:#:+nt;•ik•::'^;:••}LS .c'}•i X:N '^ =%wti}=•;+}}rr•;•}}r: :> uf:: y ..:2;jf{}d•`•{ '•'•:f:Si:'�.�4cdi,,y,{.,Jbf;;:?>:t;:,ri'kj j)}f/'jjF:ki:v;k: is};�:;•r,:>:!,••,::jf';•::+j;:•j; / 'y�'n}ji.�.��+�"•.`{•f••`::'', .^/i:" rif<' {iyP,..f.,:y{'{'4.{r::r'u{{+f}:: .;r;�kC'.{,}:. ::.:Jftiti{�:•j.y.,}.{,A y.:$: ..#;ttiYr,•;:, µ!�•�Y•' ..} -:`.ti'',•�i `.<:�5:'? ,:fv:J}. ...�4:: :.A•,;Ss}i:,...+�,.,{}�#t:+,'y :}.. ::{:iii: ?k:K}:{• i ffi•.,{g wkij•aY T?'�r.��ria „r:.:;Y4:s.k{.: :;<>:��-r:.';{:,�: i S`>}<, '•`.':x•:.;{r :•.{;,`:?,y,..:..:::•: :id\i.•:+i`:':r?:i�?Jvr:u;.;:;::.:.•u:}:.4..,r....:i>•'j .c.5>:;:`}•:`� ��: +}, E. ;}4:�::.,r..:... :,;}r.>.r::.}�::.�;•.Fr.;?i}r;..;-r:XT}{ ;�:!s'^S:isG�,c�x9'`„';'>,y'}`;'r;>;Si}r•}}:;YF}!{:.v r�•�f:r+.kk�Y.{2}t # > .•<�fi •}.;•i�+:•f.:Y%-:3:,• axi:{.x:;:<{{xyt;;:cr.;�;{:{>•>,�:a�4ss:-}:ri%.41•:?q:s:{r::S'•�.+'.x;�:(,2 vy'f�.i:r;r:tk�f�xr>},?£{#,E,#+ �•: :,:�}�� `�'{',:: {xj;;cy��'. ^�^'�{:;'�<}}.^•rti;h:#:;`•',:r�j i%j•:j�• {"S w:��ti��� �'.• •r•.;•y`�y{k:;?;•,,r/}�:j•'•r�•+r;?:i� i>3;' ;®}�...tjy>., 3.S'• �50::.;:: o •y+,/l �'{.; ur'f°,rSJ` l'; } �ks'',Y; "�•�`•i }:•:{}Yy{::f.`-;`r.,.:::t.;?:jY:`;Y!`{•{k{r•}:{•r{..•..,:ti» c�::f;}FiNfr.%::{-:}?.k{{;.jrk. S i i S.}'� '•,'• ''.v6A::`•':rf .y.<2:?;Sy•;:Yk.:io�•'`.;•n<�r::`•'%{ .��k�:��sk: :�:#�t�i:Y:;(•{fcr•,';k:{•:<}YS:k:#�''::{k.%'.s.;;ix�};r'ti;#j S i{iii i ; �,.;}�. .£�.}+cirit•:v::'stiyYh�h+`.ti`.;:;<:�5•'r 4y';;.,,t:;� ,�;yc:ii\.4+1r6.x.}•;;,a\:•"':�:rik:r{s•'4i:}`�:d•}.\k<i t;i#i�}�i•?::vf:•��}"„•�;�:�t. . l..d• •.{;:,; {f sfi~:> ;} '}•'}` r df{ f•fjvr:;ydyr,,::f:•}# , H•s � :Y+.�:�} :.�{:� ,�#:45:r'r n r d ;y}y{ 9,ir 4i '{{L � �.• 445 �;,C y .S Y.•. #it s i ;£i t`:.w ,fJ�-:L �:C:r. \dt •::. .?,y t:},.•r.•}:}•-:T;:: ..;w..,.No-: ,y9-rc .....,.... .... y},,:x.}Ki4G}.TN..•�jl;:i}?'{Y >.+}.�,;:}y,:}�'vr} :}�r• f,• G . .'. ?•r;):..:, •+Y>;%}:ri;}}:k��i 1'i}-:?•:•,+:(y,:;fr{,,,�F 4.,i :Y:,%-• ..,��.�,��:.}¢•�'•ic•T?.v{�;.`}}:t. � r:r �tiF•• ' {:i{s, °f'r'<: :;ff:l....• •4£:.,;u}; ?;}..!..., .CkY, :�>iYsF. ,.•C-�;<:•.��:N{�. ;.};{.,,.�•r: �'4 �' ,:},;}}.:-x'w`': <.::.+?.,.,�.,:nx:#kk#,�`.�{.n.a' ;}.;;:.}{sr:�:'•}:d::.�:• -.J{.nt;,tY::Y.y:.r.}:c::;?.y. .�:'•.:>.r::.;{ .+. 3,�,'s5?i.•n;{}.,}}}•:{i3y:'::y:.;}}'.}:{ ;{:.,.; ..S.iY,•:k•.yn,.' :Y 4{:•:7:.t';:: �:':y4Y{:::{.r.;:.,:{v: ...xr ..`•Y:�•}°:,�{,,� :�y,.6.}•;:,.ty. ?:..y;:.jii:":•%i:}:.r}Yiv;?::jjsfr ifc:}}.{: :j^:y::ii{i;:j/d?.••r•t{:::}.}aj;+:.'{}:':::::••}r{••ii; .,;a•..,w;,yv`. Y{;1.•%,;{;} �•`•:� :$ii?:2.!s:is?;:j?:;i;;iij^%i4'tC%Fi{jti`'}'}'•:kh:'?i',:•.".;@:;;:L•:{ .�s;,�:',,;f{r{ •;•fs�••?!??•;{?{< '•:!{{.'••' vj•�•SC,{•�ti c..k•..{.: }Y}�:..,4..� ,.$t;.:.#Y .•-"`}.,r-\}:L;Y. t. !fR'•:';,`'�i�'+,<•N:.•. .�;+`'•,4�. .h:'{`.'•;° r;k};.k.rrt+.tk::.f3ri.Y,.;>.R,y.'r ./i,:},,��sSi::t;f34y�j W,•{ ,;i*�yr,,.;`.::•:}>..#{{.ji�•:�$Yy{o;?�yy` +'�'fiiS�f%:}:' f$�{;r,s2pr.k4r;t?5}##}';:fi?� '`•£�.q��`� 'f;:rx l:'•.`3�'x�r,..'C•`;,Ffd��f�{f}:#r{�?;S`,riOC�'`{",�4Y .Fir' i5:£•: n`;:}. k•}k;; •:',:•:•,:}F.{k.,, +�'`f.'4�"h'�''•#y fi�`�,{\ s J x� ,;�y� k• r. 4 fs•` ! �� . .+.:�!'%' �Y F`>.^:\C;'i '�'',,•,'�v��•,��',,':,�.�-':^;: '}�- 4: s.. r''4',��+'a' :k�''�{tv'y ,,?i ,.N--.,f.}{:,°}: ,: fs.•4.`2,5: w.?;;t"ir<�:$,h'c'x y.., .k},}}},ii '},.`,ry0.:::}},'{t:::x:.i3:yk{3'•;:;Y}.i;•{:c Y :iiF.M1d: J'�,' t'isj}�3`c'k'kF�#;r'+Z#S:/�3a: {it2+f,#}'F Nr':.«�, .+�,o-1;'�•s'{'' {:u';-4F4':},lvG::{:{,-.rro:;c:'o," , ''.G•: :;7i;:,: {•k+f;4•.r.4�4.2X.:f-;: .�: .r�'�.:,�.�{•r�,->Y3;,.,�f?%.'±{�:� }�tt��`k�;�-.k: :��• � • ' 'f ki'ii{ F i {Y.j::#f,.:iii:.•:iYr.:L :C; •,GAY ,�il ry• .:�"•'•'q .. �cff•, ii•-. •:�:;p,. f• y:d:'. •'yf,Y: d3,.°?+l.,s r•5;,},{` ,}yj '•if;%. "°�?tr''.:`' ;s':;r.'�`' .k:;•y' 'c'd•'S;hL:•' :{C•'�•f':% M �. +{c}'•:;'?} ;#" .r..4 .?"i�.k,.};$o .,s,�..:};ar o`r,'$�� `:�,�'','; .t}_••r :MMI,, ;'�,;i./•;�;�..; "'•'•{$.:: skt�{:,% r,.r st.;.�y,,•,','.„R•n�. :�-r .?, :•:.;krY 4br`.y5' •`` :%;;” .':r,., %...........•: ..cY`, S•' w .i: .'?•,,ykf'\:•/N�,:. .•}:Y? ti •:o }} ,vi} 4: {+4i .•R•k'3r,{•`:i:£} i 3 {;•t 3 'O:CYc; f:. :.;r/ 'i ` 'r... jFr's':9Y"j �r,i• ® .. ��{ x l tiffs'••^:? C.''<•:'•;?, �••'••?'}};}''�''; a �,'x. ,M;r{h.`kk}t:'y',J;�r}'kkk'vG', �irik,�r4.^�4:: •%•'i4 ' �khfi..h>"�" ''v.�r vAi':':'.r}:?v {y,L�:v��yri?;}::Y`:ti{:y4v,'.f.•:Qwx,•'.}'. i;.'.•±iis:•f:y,,}f?:.;'+.!i;•.i.•y:�:jin::.jR;�y+'.�,:y. •.{S'S,'$`{.. t•.yd{?`'j'! k{{�'}•'�ri/:,r,x•',J,•:: :it:l'Y O}t�%}:•/{ '^•4k ,x} V q � 4 a ?}{?:},•`'•y ?fxH:•`}: :j^i?Y.4' l{f`r�k?iw:vy''1.ya+`1 •J3`�..•w; :.. 1:..:•3.x%. 4+,'•4,°`•. :;,;N. s.;t`%r,'" •axd.F,. s?_`{-kr;-!y. d9::- A � "?"S .:;,.4•"q}� ** ,$Ffyy ,: ``c�•it;},• 'r .vv?:}'r;{;�":�;+},•'�,..;r�•:i}ji?'+}.;r;n.'4.',{j}.}h,'}'v .: h•¢,:� >•i15.'::.;.}y4' J ,,;,;• +..4. ?.,t4Z,+,;Y;...y.,.�;{ {.:+•Yd•Y.s?`{.» WdM ?y <'..},C;•.y•• 4 x:.4 {.s ...,•.kF•:{{•• ,yy}.'xC ti' :j'};,•. YC`'.. }, cti.,#jk•:{}, ` k;C .;�>?:,>.•{•::••{. >s,Fi.?,44,.{� k\€,9Cii \'•w;y} ,.\: •:::`dc';.}3k: .. ,} ?xq.:;�j }xx:,:5.b. ,:x!}` .r:`..>:f x,,,,�� ,,�,•: ,,+• ,;.s•,3}"}..:L•x.•`•},. #Y+• N •. s•, ,k;.. .}J.�.;.,n.•sljri:�: .:}•/,':s. :.t�3f. y fir:::? - .;{{;}}'G: `}•�t�i t :•.sf•:d3{;54.4{�y.,};:� +•.�'?^}, j�y.".s ,�'` '..;fixkjk{C•{'!k:'•}:•w•N'{•"�+•�,�}��' F�,,.�$�•:s :••kre::�?Xr'•'::•`''t{;>..:;{+;'�'; x;.s:..{ F..•�,+: <�;, y,::,. t:+k.•. '�:`'�: �%'tti,,;,t:?.ki:•: }c,�.,\+: �'ti:•�„'k4 "�?�vy „r'�R:{4?:: ;+.��;r }.•4,4.}•:. ..f. .:l - .t {{� 4��:. ..x�yk:. � :;:�...•,-nrY ,} •:4•l::i' aH4:• :•.r..:.i�f.`.:, ..{a::::\s•;:: '�.;:`.:�?'�?u{� ,s ';Y ��•:.}.}x7t•`.',, j:�4,f,. �'4'•'aw'.��; ?;r'•r.:;w::•k::•>i�r'i:•:'•'.##c :..t-._::{::{J:�•{. },.:..,F:,. ;::f:•:• "�`�.{,•h�vr}•�:,:d•: :.}..:.i•• :cs •'.�•:' -.r•'•y••,ryr t :�`•'••` .;;, :.:{.:}:�:.•::'.`•:'•..•::{. � ..r}::..: :C.dcsa,!.... •:,;d:..Y:f.{t.,:r{'. .�'s'{^•.:t..,.n;6fd:..,..,r...?-.+J`:SV:./ii` '•k'7' ''�`-##�';�:'`.:di•�:•:•:h;•:,{..,f. {.?},..,... r•Sf•,•�d.• •}4:},.5::•:•:3:+{.:•:SFrk:<i:�Y�ii•?'.•�ty?•;:�..}` ,c'.t u:".,, ''£:• .�;4 x::, ::?..:.{?;. '•kktti:d%O}�., :::C,,{7:,, ..ii 4u Y:S.. ;::>;;3ykFi• 4Ak:44h... {: 4,:.\,:•-.a7, }:x isx+ Sr,+�R" :�; a4,$��va }.•:k,}.:•h:.h{:h:.•} `'.`v :v. .}.}'{ZK.•. .n l.•, .ktifj}}"}.:, ,:,u•:kx•rj vS}:{:•...............<.:.:{,:. r.. :. ;..4. •..:`..`} .�s:;.. ...4b..;3:.,',. '.lo-3:.y':.y}}:.::ii:•,`:,1:{{qs.4`:} y•;•i:'•',�••`Y'.- :•.y{y:$}u:,• d;ik :'•:}•,•••yl.:Ji•{.}}`:dy:Fi;;:.Y:.; .>ir.4:.•{?sx•v "••:a}af:;>••;•• { 'tt`n';,Yr:+.ii:?Y.';fC.'{:S;i-/,. xj<c•.rC,J.,.j.{wi�,t{.,fiL+S;�4 :yf;,N!,.`.;,5: :`:xkr'<•:+e;+.{:},.,., ter, x:•a::x[rii .: +r'.'•'`,:r•.s4: ••C:• kx:':;i:#:��k.d{. :. „ hx5.. ::'i}�•}%4v}C v.,•n+, .,..K{y{i;}.;`.. ?�.,`'3: :. �C• _ ;.•fir.::? ?•a.:,.{? ..}+}}'.kx%.''•• :Y f.'3..�"'�S• ::??-!`�;Y.`-•`:i;:{•..p'::>{ :d{}^'?:.+.;:•.{r.•::.}•'~,'�`,:.�:}: t; :}•.• .+,• -%Z.: ::rti•>}. :{.3:};{%.R:;}::j'r:�i-.,.yr>;.:•.?S./•:•}f::f •7..y,+r :,.Ji•���kcC��?frks•:•.,:s:•:1:�:•: {: ::G:: •:s� c':ir k oaS,;:'•�`x•{1�:•kk.:'C ;.'. :::++:•:v:,¢..} .;;..;.::�: •: .,.f ;�i.}:}}:J.3iSL{..;;lt .....:. r�rF j: {: :: .....3cs:+{da 's:5::::.:-.•-?ud�'.;.i;7,•::., }) �:r.•.;. :\;•�,.•��•• }er,• •. ?44 .$s:K`.'�akne:�`:'tiv}:y:ik;{' ?;:;:%%'�:.;..,•. �`7}:.v. •:•y" •}\kk ::•,`, :df:}3}... ,. k.. .:'::. y.?'}'->.,.,a: .k.{;S,rSjxCn,+:•?3,Y�;.p\ :a.• <. !rt,ff.r.rv. F•`:�iY: .i'r•:rf f r .:.!.r..i'}}is;r�fk-��}+ :�'%kk:i' :•�;}.}}}Y: .}�"•.ys:{• :;:{%;#':}:jj•k i%.j.,.•Yf;@..;:.r f.,,�,,�•.y{•�.,•: }}:t:'•i::r.•::G..ry:,+•: `%?3:i!.::ti+�::r9:+�:::. n:y . 4•.{•.'r.r::"•,::`•:;,c}t•::}}:tj}:.?+t ,.t.{ k. J{... :k..:.v:,,l:•:•.i'N {:::•}i.,• {:.},r:;n:i;x.:<.. :7t :.�c• :�{. ,.;�.,. ,:t• ':�4: ki:?�Y• :•S:+t; 4� �:. '";Sc�:. .�•.:{:v`ajkyY:•.4,c +:•.,Y. �}4 \ .�{.... :i..3 4+ .� �:.;t.:. risn:s:::;s8{>••::r,.>.;s.:+t.{:�5�+••}:'<:•:•.4:�5#;::`��5\.?�:�.,p,�o„pt�,�r.>:. ••�- hc.x.F.;i ..f.•:1:i{; k�'r3': {-:{.-'{f.. n�Ftk .{•j,'vU{}?}`•dC,C•?fjY•�';;`fi5}i?. '+i$:F:a.v}}}r.ti4:}.#1 ii�•i:i�" {{4:'''Y :+'f.•+f,� �� I }x•Y••o»» :{<.:}..}r.+;;'#2^vi :.{-::C.:Y:::`}.,:.. ,:..!.•},.i :: ::%k'N• :,.,;f::'::::}. LL}+r{yk{rj+..:<•F},.ry.{:::\::}:{}::;:•,n}'h}x{i:;jk:i?ik}•'i:•'.�•`;.L'j'•'.•}.�+.,:•...}v}A4 F.>,?}.:{,{.!::s{j.v:;.y�j„yf..}f`Y"k{.3k.•tr�'34,+i4o-"4•�}x`,.�`.,,?: '}:'`:}'}n•'#,•,'a,i%{rf.6.?}�-:rs/•..;•{:.:,'}••'{•:}�\•:s+yC•R•�:}.k.-yr4'.-{•::ti�:•/n!ii:'S,}}f,4;,F:•::'.•.F,?sk,.;:..h;.h.Y>'t.v.:,:.ti:r%;•k.'d.:.S.^;:.g;?.:�}♦}{•:y• will:4•;Z. y:•F•:• r.•,,,,-r:•::Jt:�,�.t�•f.r•r£..,,.:',{u.}is;:1 • , i:;�;tt :t•$:.•{!!s:;?r.:vy.4n}'..;:,,.�}syr.!::.yr:r-x,k}•{✓:•fL•:'r: .R:.4*`•::?:r{t}tfi.r•:.,+rv.}•}::: 1... .,:,,ti:..y;;;C• �,�•:Yrx::: .##k.•rn;. :,�.,J . :i.'{:k45::}"{){:}k: W.•:}5.:,(fp}{iCA,;{4(5•:'} S• +b'8'F. .:.t,{.v ,,,M;i'?}'rr :.;}:y,C.:,„{k{. %r :•R-:(.:4'{} . {:;:}}f,:;,�+>#;;%{^ �`0Y:/3.4 .<:}iT`44'k',.4h-kfi.;�+k1',da',�•{.. ;tk� i n:;:#t>h ?•f r,Yn4NN j;:;..;y.,•fif:ij:.;j{•:r.#'?d'f ,.i,•'[•r':{.,>r+• :f+"y':i+`'•,;}:.:t't;'•n r.; yk?.;o...i>y,-; -:!%cii}y'.•:?.:F:+:}.!f•'/. :,•:,,•,`,tl,+?, :i4'/;.5: },•.: Su {•.•i }u{:: v Yrr.+o�f k,0 C s}, s F ,,}•C., .tikS{;.{};.;.;:•:.•S':'}>;<} :4?v}}4•?,;•• 44 4Yh.�\: •: ';k;��' s.<.F;.'r .#: 4 \� ,1� 4. wk mak,'•:;;.•;3.:;'.2}: .:\'X.�+ 4 y '•.ryi{ }.'::% :'l✓r4.;i} 3:+?i:`t:•:•.s,+•'y �».'54rb+'.s;*}w'.;,a'j.r?:::.r,,,:{:.}.54r;.iF.t.:_ii:r5k.<..,J;,:.Gk,a.{:,a.#�5:-h.:}:;:r:.✓'`�'..�-.:.p•.',}3:,+:vcow,}.r`�•:3.:k4'{:`;:y.:.3w}:j:s•:�f>}•r'K�r{+., ,h.�•4.;:•^t?'t.„'::4}•;::?1t,}+;s••4�.}{�•}.•:4,,�;sr4{:}.0£•:..;'{.}:C:+{�,t.!"C``•f-•'.�.:`,:,'rk;r•}{:'•:^:.:\;./}i{..n,�,k#�:�`i'•:":`.•/s:2,::.�:r:;,•k/i2;\1".::?2'Y-:{.�j:ax.:,':"r•1•:f`.?:`t'r:•{:<a>::•w,}y,+r:,`}.fi}:cr}�•X.t+,r•c>,:`:}{-s}:;�,:Y y•6}�+:%..{>.:4'\'tvk}'},%�:>k:'Jv:`r::?:�,�}n�.;:f'"L''}y,S�.;:;��:c.!:2.�<•i•at:.•i{{�•v'',}{i';cvy4}t�{yx:{::3s:3:,}•;#i..;l#:.r:r.t•;::::;#;�:,qvl,.:�x; "''•k''��:.:{'?€ .;....,. :V^.....; ...... vr,ki., %{•.yfiS.n{:.:.,:: - � ®� •� �S ! •.}:'..•.. {i..•ti':^i>.Y t' f- -Nhf{?+.r::.'r'`:iiiY:?k 'A• .......... ..54:vk•�,••?,.,f�,^c:{ji;„•dP•• r:.,N :,� �. K; w ":cis >;y{`,c\#ty r;.. ..,{<:' :3 r^..;�v'•fF:'":/4f:r;..., }•'jS3:•.ys� 4w�,y� -�?vs`,.t+'y •d^f:•••_,r.'1Y.• q� :yr•C.y?H.:.;. �fr., ,�.y, .,ri# 4 ..,..:•uky; is:.: •1,iD{s¢'{y'$�.4�h-•{�;l"'t4 ';C.' ,;k$�::5, 4{.;,..,•r,i 4J �(.�'rY ,1'�,`�{'?x �''{=� �': . alV'�•L',-\':3.:v v?:iC};s'' '^,r 'FX6 +.��� �.�}��rr//,,,s,�} .:Ydiy .{�:+` _?"+ +.�.'> l��',?J' � �� NorthStar ENGINEERING Civil Engineers•Planners•Surveyors RECEIVED JUL 12 2090 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION July 11, 2000 County of Butte PLANNING DIVISION 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95969 Attention : Dan Breedon Re: General Plan & Rezone 00-04 for Harold Ball Dear Dan, On behalf of our client, we request that said GPA & Rezone be removed from the Planning Commission Agenda of July 13th and be continued to a later date. The reason for this request is so we can look into initiating a specific development plan for Mr. Ball's property and the surrounding area with the City of Chico and with the County Planning staff. We apologize for any inconvenience and we appreciate your cooperation regarding this matter Please call this office if you have any questions. Sincerely, NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING RickRodriguez tl'�> t.• � ...-�.`•...•:J'r-.<�•.t.'.Sr ,..'L• .fl.f',; ���"r i.. ;i° .`r ir. ^., r,:�,,. i':.` .,. ... '.f. �n�i!1. (. , 20 DECLARATION DRIVE CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 '530-893-1600' ' FAX-893-2113 0. . ....... ... ............... .. P 1:XX X. �W ... ................ XA, '81 �..Xx.:-X; X.: .......... *'.*'.*'.*..........11'11.11iiill�`,�`,- MOM X. .......... K ........... .................... .......... .X. XXXXXX M, X. X� h.0, X.: M M —1 M ................. ........... ............ ;u .......... -0 ..................... .......... . .. . . ............ .......... -=Z I ff .. .. ..... ....... . ..... . "::x ... ... ... ............ I..... ......� .zR�W BUTTE COUNTY PLANNMG COMMSSION Applicant: Harold Ball Owner: Shirey Family Trust Existing Zene: A-20 Agricultural,20 acre, -N M Supervisorial Request: General Plan Amendment from Orchard&Field Crops to Commercial and Rezone from A-20 to District#2 Assessor Parclel No: 006-690-012&013 LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY .� PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ;s 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 July 7, 2000 Harold Ball 6846 W. Waverly Redding, CA 96001 Re: General Plan Amendment and Rezone, AP 006-690-012 & 013, GPA/RZ 00-04 Dear Mr. Ball: Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a General Plan Amendment from Orchard and Field Crops to Commercial and a Rezone from A-20(Agricultural-20 acre parcel) to C-2(General Commercial)on the west side of the Esplanade. Should you have any concerns with the report or conditions of approval, please contact us in advance of the meeting so that we may work together to resolve your concerns. A public hearing has been set for July 13, 2000, 9:30 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors'Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be .present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact.Dan Breedon of this office at 538-7601,between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Services Assistant Enc. cc: NorthStar Engineering j:\wpdocs\pclts\schedule.mrg BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT -July 13, 2000 Applicants: Harold Ball Location: The properties are located west of and adjacent to the. File#: GPA/RZ 00-04 Esplanade, approximately one-quarter mile southeast of Request: General Plan Amendment Nord Highway, at 3395 from Orchard & Field Crops Esplanade, Chico. General Plan designation to a Commercial General Plan Parcel Size: Two 5-acre parcels designation, and Rezone from totaling 10-acres A=20 (Agricultural, 20-acre parcels) to C-2 (General Zone date: 3-1-88 Commercial). Supervisor District: 2 G.P.: Orchard and Field Crops Attachments: Zoning: A-20 (Agricultural, 20-acre parcels) A. Conditional Zoning B. General Plan and Zoning Map APN: 006-690-012, 006-690-013 C. Vicinity Map D. Initial Study Project Planner: Daniel C. Breedon, E. Exhibit Map Senior Planner STAFF COMMENT: This property is located within the Orchard&Field Crops General Plan designation. Butte County has specific land use policies contained within the Agricultural Element of the General Plan that are applicable to this project. The applicability of these policies to the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone is subject to policy interpretation of the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. Depending upon this determination, the project may or may not conform to General Plan policy. The Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors must determine if the General Plan Amendment,as proposed, is consistent with the General Plan and find that the General Plan Amendment is in the public interest, in accordance with Government Code Section 65358 (a). Staff is recommending that this project be denied because it is inconsistent with the Agricultural Element's Goals and Policies and it would result in piecemeal decisions. If the Planning Commission desires to approve the General Plan Amendment and Rezone it is recommended that staff be directed to provide findings of consistency with the applicable Agricultural Element Goals and Policies. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT July 13,2000 ■PAGE I ■ PROJECT DESCRIPTION/CHARACTERISTICS: This is a request for a General Plan Amendment from Orchard & Field Crops General Plan designation to a Commercial General Plan designation,and Rezone from A-20(Agricultural,20-acre parcels) to C-2 (General Commercial), on two, 5-acre parcels. The applicant currently has no specific proposal for development of the property, but indicates that a cabinet shop or auto body shop is typical of the uses anticipated for development. The property is currently improved with an orchard and is developed with a single family dwelling. Slope is minimal, to the southwest. Soil consists of the Vina clay loam series on the front portion and Farwell clay loam on the balance of the property. Access is provided by a private driveway, which connects with the Esplanade, a County road. Shirey Road is shown to serve these parcels,but it has not been developed. ANALYSIS: Policy Discussion This area can be characterized as being at the fringe of the urban and commercial influences of the City of Chico. This is supported by the proximity of the City's Sphere of Influence and Urban Area, which is adjacent to the property,to the northeast across the Esplanade. Large tracts of Commercial land run the length of the Esplanade at this location. With a few exceptions, the Esplanade forms the boundary between the urban influences described above and the Orchard and Field Crop lands, of which this property is a part. The City Limits of Chico lie approximately 2000 feet to the southwest, at East Eaton Road. Approval of this General Plan Amendment and rezone could result in subsequent amendments of the general plan in this area. Similar Rezones and General Plan Amendments could be approved in the area, and depending upon each proposal, the number of parcels allowed could dramatically increase, further compromising Orchard and Field Crops land. The County Zoning maps indicate that there is proximate vacant land that is zoned C-2,which would allow for additional commercial growth in the area without changing the Orchard and Field Crops General Plan designation, and thereby impacting prime agricultural land. Based upon the location of this property within the Orchard and Field Crops General Plan designation and the additional information as discussed above, this proposal may be inconsistent with the following goals and policies from the Agricultural Element: Goal 1: Maintains parcel sizes that ensure the long-term preservation, conservation and continuity of those General Plan areas identified as Orchard & Field Crops and Grazing and Open Lands. Goal 2 States that agricultural land at city and community boundaries should be conserved and stabilized in order to protect agricultural lands from encroachment and conversion to urban uses. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■AGENDA REPORT m July 13,2000 ■ PAGE 2 ■ Policy 2.1 States that agriculture shall not be made inviable by the economic impacts of urban development. Policy 2.5 Encourage urban development to the Local Agency Formation Committee's adopted Sphere of Influence. Policy 3.5 Indicates that the primary purpose of the Orchard & Field Crops land use categories shall be for agricultural production, related processing, and services in support of agriculture. Surrounding Uses Although this property is located within an agricultural area, other commercial development is prominent along the Esplanade. A kiwi processing plant and the Basque Norte restaurant are located on parcels south of this area. The Commercial property located across the Esplanade is currently vacant, but future plans call for a community park and possible soccer field. Shasta Elementary School is also located across the Esplanade. However, much of the land adjacent to the property is utilized for agricultural purposes. Two residences are located within this agricultural area,besides the residence located on the subject property. Existing Services The property is provided with water service by the California Water Company. The California Water Company indicates that water service to the commercial uses allowed within the C-2 zone can be accommodated. Sewer service is not available at this location. The closest sewer service is provided by the City of Chico, and is located approximately 2000 feet south of the project area near Eaton Avenue. Service from the City of Chico requires annexation to the City,which is not anticipated to occur at this time, but may occur in the future. Since no sewer service is provided to this property, site development will require the use of an on- site sewage disposal system. The Butte County Environmental Health Department indicates that the project is located in an area where soils are adequate for on-site sewage disposal. However, the Health Department notes that sewage flows over 2,500 gallons/day will require approval from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Some commercial uses allowed under the C-2 zone may need Regional Water Quality Control Board approval, since they will exceed the 2,500 gallon/day limit on sewage flow. The property is served by the Esplanade, a major county thoroughfare. The Esplanade provides for an unrestricted flow of traffic at this location. Good traffic flow is maintained on the Esplanade until the intersection of East Avenue, where greater number of vehicles contribute to longer traffic delays. Good circulation is provided from the Esplanade by East Eaton Road, which connects with State Route 99 with a full freeway interchange. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT 0 July 13,2000 ■ PAGE 3 ■ Comm nts Received From the City of Chico The City of Chico indicates that a specific or precise plan may be warranted for development in this area. The City has commented that problems with traffic circulation in the area need to be addressed using an overall development plan. This would enhance circulation, bicycle and pedestrian access and would link future commercial and residential uses with Shasta Elementary School, along the Esplanade. This would also promote development of a strong mixed-use neighborhood to compliment schools, a future community park proposal, to be developed by the Chico Area Recreation District(De Garmo Park), aid the extension of urban facilities and services, and help to develop an appropriate buffer for the Chico Area Greenline. Without a Specific Plan the City staff maintains that further incremental development of the area, as proposed by this General Plan Amendment and Rezone, will result in additional circulation and connectivity problems and ultimately create incompatible land uses. The City of Chico urges the County to table consideration of this proposal until a specific or precise plan can be prepared for the area north of Eaton Road and West of the Esplanade. City staff states that if the County wishes to proceed with this proposal, that the County consider an amendment consistent with the City's General Plan and zoning, since it is very likely that this, and surrounding properties will ultimately develop in the City. Although the City's comments are critical to reaching a policy decision regarding future planning in this area and the preservation of agricultural resources,the city has no jurisdictional standing with regard to this property. The City's SOI and Urban Area is adjacent to the property, but does not encompass the property. Chico Area Greenline This area is unique in that it represents the only Orchard and Field Crop land west of the City of Chico that is within the"urban side"of the Chico Area Greenline. The vast majority of Orchard and Field Crops land is located on the "agricultural side"of the Greenline. This area comprises about 12 parcels equaling 221(+/-) acres of Orchard & Field Crops land, and is almost entirely used for agricultural production. The City of Chico indicates that this represents the only area where the County and City Greenlines are at variance. The City explains that, at the time of adoption of the Greenline,the County included the 221 acres, west of the Esplanade, on the urban side of the Greenline, despite its agricultural designation and use. The City opted to maintain the land on the agricultural side of the Greenline, until future development was imminent. Recently, a landowner approached the City to request consideration of amending the Sphere of Influence(SOI) to include this additional acreage within the Urban Area. City staff included the proposed SOI amendment in the 5-year review of the General Plan, and the City Council directed City staff to proceed with processing the amendments. Inclusion of the area within the Urban Area and SOI is the first step towards future annexation. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■AGENDA REPORT July 13,2000 ■ PAGE 4 ■ 300 foot Agricultural Setback Should the General Plan Amendment and Rezone be determined as consistent with the Agricultural Element policies, a 300 foot agricultural buffer is recommended along the site's boundaries with Orchard and Field Crops land. It should be noted that the existing size of these parcels, at 5-acres each, may not be large enough to allow for the required 300 foot setback. The size of the setback may be reduced since the uses permitted under the proposed C-2 zoning are commercial and not residential in nature. This would be at the discretion of the Planning Commission. Determining that the General Plan Amendment is Within the Public Interest California Government Code Section 65358 indicates that amendments to the General Plan can be approved by the legislative body when they are found to be in the public interest. In order to approve a General Plan amendment, the Planning Commission must recommend to the Board of Supervisors that this action is in the public interest. Policy Decision Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the relevant Policies and Programs from the Agricultural Element and findings supporting denial provided by staff. If it is determined that the project conforms to these policies, it may be beneficial to continue the project to allow staff time to write formal findings for the Planning Commission's final recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. RECOMMENDATION: ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following two actions: I. Recommend that the Board of Supervisors deny General Plan Amendment and Rezone 99- 04, for Harold Ball,based upon the following inconsistencies with the Agricultural Element of the General Plan: Agricultural Element Goal 1: Maintains parcel sizes that ensure the long-term preservation, conservation and continuity of those General Plan areas identified as Orchard & Field Crops and Grazing and Open Lands. This proposal would reduce the applicable parcel size below the current 20- acre minimum imposed by the A-20 zone. The allowable parcel size would be reduced to a size sufficient for commercial development and on-site sewage disposal systems. The piecemeal conversion of agricultural land into smaller parcels will not promote long-term preservation, conservation and continuity of those General Plan areas identified as Orchard&Field Crops. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT 0 July 13,2000 0 PAGE 5 ■ Goal 2 States that agricultural land at city and community boundaries should be conserved and stabilized in order to protect agricultural lands from encroachment and conversion to urban uses. This proposal is at the boundary of the Sphere of Influence and the Urban Area Boundary for the City of Chico. The Esplanade separates the agricultural land to the west from the urban influences associated with the City of Chico to the east. This proposal would constitute encroachment of commercial, urban uses into agricultural land on the west side of the Esplanade. Policy 2.1 States that agriculture shall not be made inviable by the economic impacts of urban development. Encroachment of commercial uses into productive agricultural land such as is proposed will influence adjacent commercial agricultural activities. The development of commercial uses within agricultural areas can result in agricultural lands becoming less desirable for agricultural uses or to be completely converted to other land uses. This arises from market pressures, complaints from adjacent property owners, and decreases in production caused by competing incompatible land uses. Policy 2.5 Encourage urban development to the Local Agency Formation Committee's adopted Sphere of Influence. This proposal constitutes urban development outside of the Chico Urban Area boundary and does not maintain urban development within the adopted Urban Area. Policy 3.5 Indicates that the primary purpose of the Orchard & Field Crops land use categories shall be for agricultural production, related processing, and services in support of agriculture. This proposal would allow commercial development in an area primarily devoted to agricultural activities and would not be conducive to the primary use of the area for agricultural production. II. Find that GPA/RZ 00-04 is not in the public interest per California Government Code Section 65358 due to the inconsistencies with the County General Plan. I. Continue GPA/RZ 00-04 for Harold Ball and direct staff to provide findings for the applicable Goals and Policies from the Agricultural Element identified as inconsistent with ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■AGENDA REPORT ■ July 13,2000 ■PAGE 6 this project,and find that the General Plan Amendment is in the Public Interest per California Government Code Section 65358 K:\PROJECTS\GPA\BALL.GPA\REPORT 1.WPD ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT July 13,2000 ■ PAGE 7 ■ Vicinity Map /j61son La ding Rnad Chico Airport 0 3 D Nord Trr R Project Location Ava -1 -CO Oak Aommto�V. ...... ...... lip GPA/RZ 00=04- AP 04AP 006-690-012&006-690-013 17 R-1 A-20 U C-2 R-1 C- 000, R-2 MHP 0.88 C-2 51.64 30.62 ii 006-690-013 A-20 006-690-012 31.21 Project Location 8.71 A-5 x X, .01 A-40 el 500 0 Soo 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 r 3500 4000 Feet BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMILVIISSION Applicant: Harold Ball Owner: Shirey Family Trust Hearing Date: July 13,2000 @ 9:30 a.m. Existing Zone: A-20 Agricultural,20 acre minimum) N Supervisorial Request: General Plan Amendment from Orchard&Field Crops to Commercial and Rezone from A-20 to .District#2 C-2(General Commercial). Assessor Parcel No: 006-690-012&013 Ffie: 00-04 G • n NOT TO SCALE P 0 O 9y9 7- v� 0 �0 0 �P 1 p� GD a � R,ECEIVEI) MAR 15 2030 LEGENDBUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION I AREA OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ® TO COMMERCIAL FROM ORCHARD & PLAT TO ACCOMPANY FIELD CROPS.- 10 ACRES w/ecDGs GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT BOUNDARY OF EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSAPN 006-690-012 & 013 PUBLIC EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION - s • • � ol f *� �� _ ��• -_ . ,�� ••tri•• ••i ••�• •�,�� �j� :.. :-�-.. lb 4b dmL lw • • ♦ • �` -":::-.-��i• �� • '� •� moi• • � { 1�r counfyrf �.... LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES :{• -:'`W°'Y'•" '''^ 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OR_OVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net Date: June 23, 2000 To: Responsible and Trustee Agencies Subject: NOTICE OF INTENT - To Adopt a Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone (GPA/RZ 00-04) w The Butte County Planning Division has completed an Initial Study, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), of potential environmental consequences anticipated in connection with the above-mentioned project, a copy of which is enclosed. This letter serves as a Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration to allow responsible and trustee agencies a 20-day review period in accordance with Sections 15072 and 15105 of the CEQA Guidelines. Please review the enclosed Initial Study and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration. This review should focus on your agency's area of expertise and jurisdiction. Any comments must be sent to the above address prior to July 13, 2000. A Public Hearing has been scheduled for July 13, 2000 before the Butte County Planning Commission. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed environmental document, please contact this office between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Daniel C. Breedon Senior Planner cc: Harold Ball NorthStar Engineering Butte County Public Works Department Butte County Environmental Health Department California Department of Forestry Air Quality Management District Butte County Agricultural Commissioner" .` Butte County Farm Bureau= ; . „ • `' , California Water Company 4 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 COUNTY OF BUTTE INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS I. BACKGROUND: 1. Name of Proponent: Harold Ball 2. Address: 6846 West Waverly, Redding., CA 96001 Phone: 530-243-1948 3. Name of Proposal: Ball Rezone and General Plan Amendment (GPA/RZ 00-04) 4. Type of Project: General Plan Amendment and Rezone 5. Project Description: General Plan Amendment from Orchard & Field Crops General Plan designation to a Commercial General Plan designation, and Rezone from A-20 (Agricultural, 20-acre parcels) to C-2 (General Commercial), on two, 5-acre parcels. The property is provided water service by the California Water Company. City of Chico sewer service is not available at this location. The property would be served by on-site sewage disposal. 6. Location of project: The properties are located west of and adjacent to the Esplanade, approximately one-quarter mile southeast of Nord Highway, at 3395 Esplanade, Chico. 7. Setting: The property is currently occupied by an orchard and is developed with a single family dwelling. Slope is minimal to the southwest. Soil consists of the Vina clay loam series on the front portion and Farwell clay loam on the balance of the property. Access is provided by a private driveway, which connects with the Esplanade, a County road. Shirey Road is shown to serve these parcels, but it has not been developed. Note: The project specific environmental issues that may result from a land division allowed under this proposal would be completely addressed when an application is made for a subdivision. This Initial Study addresses the environmental impacts directly related to a change in the zoning designation and General Plan designation. 6. Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 006-690-012 and 006-690-013 7. Date Checklist Submitted: June 23, 2000 8. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 1 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 H. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. =C , �I-� 6 -Z-S.-2cce Prepared by: Daniel C. Breedon, Senior Planner Date r��4 yJ-Z,01J �-2(3�1 6 e 'ewed by: dy Wilson, Principal Planner Date M. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division 0 2 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 ❑ Aesthetics 3t Agriculture Resources 0 Air Quality ❑ Biological resources ❑ Cultural Resources 0 Geology/Soils ❑ Hazards/Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality K Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise p Population VHousing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources.show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone. A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards, (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on a'project-specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact"to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 3 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation' measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each.issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question-, and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any,to reduce the impact to less than significant. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 1t 5 b) Substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? K c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? 1t ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 4 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less ' Potentially With Than k Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? K Response: This project will not affect a scenic vista nor,have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. The site is not located along a State or County designated scenic highway. Mitigation: None required. 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland . Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unque Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? X b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X c) Involve other changes in the existing - environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 5 ' Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Response: This property is designated as Orchard and Field Crops by the County General Plan. The soil is classified as Vina clay loam and Farwell clay adobe by U.S. Department of Agriculture mapping of soils in Butte County. The soil series and General Plan indicates that this property is valuable for agricultural uses. The property is developed with a producing almond orchard, and a single family dwelling. There is no Williamson Act contract affecting this property. Butte county has specific land use policies contained within the Agricultural Element of the General Plan regarding development of agricultural land designated as Orchard and Field Crops. The applicability of these policies to the subject General Plan Amendment and Rezone is subject to interpretation of the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. Depending upon this determination,the project may or may not have an impact on agricultural resources in the County. The Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors must also determine if the General Plan Amendment, as proposed, is in the public interest, in accordance with Government Code Section 65358 (a). Policy Discussion This area can be characterized as being at the fringe of the urban and commercial influences of the City of Chico. This is supported by the proximity of the City's Sphere of Influence and Urban Area, which is adjacent to the property, to the northeast across the Esplanade. Large tracts of Commercial land run the length of the Esplanade at this location. With a few exceptions, the Esplanade forms the boundary between the urban influences described above and the Orchard and Field Crop lands of which this property is apart. The City Limits of Chico He approximately 2000 feet to the southwest, at East Eaton Road. This area is unique in that it represents the only Orchard and Field Crop land west of the City of Chico that is within the Urban side of the Chico Area Greenline. The vast majority of Orchard and Field Crops land is located on the agricultural side of the Greenline. This area comprises a total of 12 parcels equaling approximately 221 acres of Orchard & Field Crops land, and is almost entirely used for agricultural production. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 6 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Approval of this General Plan Amendment and rezone could result in subsequent amendments of the general plan in this area. Similar.Rezone and General Plan Amendments could be approved in the 221-acre area, and depending upon each proposal, the number of parcels allowed could dramatically increase in the area. This would further compromise the protection of the Orchard and Field Crops General Plan designation in this area. There is proximate vacant land that is zoned C-2, which would allow for additional commercial growth in the area without changing the Orchard and Field Crops General Plan designation, and thereby impacting prime agricultural land. Based upon the location of this property within the Orchard and Field Crops General Plan designation and the additional information as discussed above, the following goals and policies from the Agricultural Element may be inconsistent with this proposal: Agricultural Element Goal 1: Maintains parcel sizes that ensure the long-term preservation, conservation and continuity of those General Plan areas identified as Orchard & Field Crops and Grazing and Open Lands. Goal 2 States that agricultural land at city and community boundaries should be conserved and stabilized in order to protect agricultural lands from encroachment and conversion to urban uses. Policy 1.6: Limits the minimum parcel sizes for new land divisions, in areas identified as Orchard and Field Crops on the General Plan Land Use Map, to not less than the existing zoning designations from 5 to 160 acres. The densities currently established by the existing zoning on Orchard and Field Crops lands shall be the minimum lot size allowable. Further subdivision of Orchard and Field Crops lands are discouraged. Program 2.2 The Zoning Ordinance shall require that la buffer be established on property proposed for residential development in order to protect existing agricultural uses from incompatible use conflicts. The desired standard shall be 300 feet, but may be adjusted to address unusual circumstances. Guidelines, as part of the General Plan's implementation, shall be developed illustrating buffer requirements for various situations. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 7 • Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Policy 3.5 Indicates that the primary purpose of the Orchard & Field Crops land use categories shall be for agricultural production, related processing, and services in support of agriculture. Should the General Plan Amendment and Rezone be determined as consistent with these policies, a 300 foot agricultural buffer is recommended along the site's boundaries with Orchard and Field Crops land. It should be noted that the existing size of these parcels, at 5-acres each in size, may not be sufficient in size to allow for the required 300 foot setback. The size of the setback may be reduced since the uses permitted under the proposed C-2 zoning are commercial and not residential in nature. This would be at the discretion of the Planning Commission. Mitigation Measure#1: In accordance with Butte County General Plan Agricultural Program 2.2, an agricultural buffer shall be established 300 feet in width (or of a width determined acceptable by the Planning Commission) along the south, west and north property lines. The buffer shall be labeled as a building site exclusion area. This setback shall be delineated on any future parcel map application, as a condition of recording. 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? �t b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 8 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? at d)Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? 9t e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Response: a. - d. Future proposals to develop the land to the extent permitted by the zoning will require additional environmental review to assess the potential impacts from any proposed roads and development associated with the subdivision. Appropriate air quality control measures will be incorporated at that time. Future proposals must also consider the standards as set forth by both the California Air Resources Board and the Environmental Protection Agency. These standards have been established to protect human health and welfare. Counties are designated in attainment if the standards are met and in nonattainment if they are not met. Butte County, and all Northern Sacramento Valley Air Districts, have been designated as being "moderate" nonattainment areas for the State standards for ozone and fine particulate matter defined as smaller than 10 microns (Particulate Matter 10, or "PM1011). Currently, Butte County is in attainment for all the federal air quality standards which are less stringent than the State of California standards. e. The proposed commercial zone should not have any impact associated with the creation of objectional odors affecting a substantial number of people. A large amount of commercial land is already developed in the area. The open land adjacent to this property will not be affected, even if certain commercial uses generate unique odors. Mitigation: None required. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division 0 9 • 3 i Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact i a)Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? x b) Have a substantial adverse effect on # any riparian habitat or other sensitive ' natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by ' the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? X c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological t interruption, or other means? 1t d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery ' sites? X e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy ordinance. 1t f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. , ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 10 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? x Response: It is not recommended that Fish and Game Filing fees be required, and a Deminimus impact finding shall be made with respect to the project's impact on fish and wildlife. The property has been developed with a productive orchard, which does not promote the establishment of wildlife or wildlife habitat. Mitigation: None required. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? )t b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? )t c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? 1t d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? K Response: According to Butte County constraints mapping, the project site is located in an area considered to have a high archeological sensitivity. Often such sites are found in foothill areas, areas with high bluffs, rock outcroppings, areas overlooking deer migratory corridors, or above bodies of water. This mapping is general in nature and basis the probability of archeological significance on the physical characteristics and history of different areas of the ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 11 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact County. Classification of this property as having a high sensitivity for archeological resources does not in itself indicate the presence of archaeological resources. The proposed Parcel Map,may result in a land division that would allow two additional home sites, construction of which may have an impact on archaeological sites. Due to the site's classification within the High archeological sensitivity area, mitigation should be included to protect archeological resources. Under normal procedures a pedestrian level survey is required for projects within these areas. However,this site has been developed with a mature almond orchard for many years, and any archaelogical resources present may have been destroyed or moved off-site during site development and maintenance of the orchard. There is still the possiblity of archaelogical resources being present below the ground surface, which may be disturbed during site developement. However, this is unlikely due to the amount of disturbance associated with orchard development and maintenance. Mitigation: None required. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: �t 1) Rupture of a known earth- quake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other sub- stantial evidence of a know fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. K 2) Strong seismic ground Shaking? K 3) Seismic-related ground failure, ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 12 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact including liquefaction? X 4) Landslides? X b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating sub- stantial risks to life or property? X e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal or waste water? X Response: a.1. The Seismic Safety Element indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The closest mapped Fault-Rupture Zone is the Cleveland Hills Fault line which is located approximately 25 miles to the southeast. No impacts are anticipated as a result of fault rupture and no seismic related requirements are necessary. a.2. The intensity of ground shaking at any specific site depends on the characteristics of the earthquake,the distance from the earthquake, and on the local geologic soils and ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 13 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact conditions. At present, there is insufficient data to predict accurately the expected ground motions at various locations in Butte County. a.3. The Butte County Seismic Safety Element's Liquefaction Potential Map indicates that the site has a moderate potential for liquefaction. No impact is anticipated. a.4. The Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that there is no potential for landslides in this area. No Impact is anticipated. The Subsidence"and Landslide Potential Map also indicates that the property is located within an area of heavy groundwater withdrawal and is a potential subsidence area. Although so designated, this designation is general in nature, and is applicable to virtually all of the Central Valley area of Butte County. Although subsidence is a problem in all of the Central Valley in California due to groundwater withdrawals for irrigation, there has not been any documented incidents that indicates a specific problem at this location. No Impact is anticipated. b. The Erosion Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that there is no erosion potential at this site. No impact is anticipated. C. No impact is anticipated from instability, landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. d. The Conservation Element's Expansive Soils Map indicates that the project site has a moderate expansive soil designation. No impact is anticipated. e. The Butte County Environmental Health Department indicates that the project is located in an area where soils are adequate for on-site sewage disposal. The Health Department notes that sewage flows over 2,500 gallons/day will require approval from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b) Create a significant hazard to the ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 14 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools? K d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code ; Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? K e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? )t g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 1t h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 15 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X Response: a. - g. The project will not interfere with any airport or emergency response plan nor is located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. h. The Butte County Fire Department/California Department of Forestry indicates that this individual General Plan Amendment and Rezone has no impact,on the Fire Department, but the cumulative affect of the General Plan Amendment and Rezone and higher density and differing use results in an incremental increase in demand for fire protection services. Subsequent improvements to the land will be required to provide pressurized water systems capable of producing the necessary fire flow and hydrant spacing approved by the Butte County Fire Department. Mitigation: None required. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? 1t b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? )t c) Substantially alter the existing drainage j pattern of the site or area, including ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 16 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?' at d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? X e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? 1t h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? �t } I) Expose people or structures to a Y ' significant risk or loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 17 , 6 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 1t Response: a. - f. Future development proposals permitted by the General Plan Amendment and Rezone will require additional project-specific review to assess the potential impacts to water quality, drainage and groundwater withdrawal. It is not anticipated that development of the 2, 5-acre parcels proposed will have an impact on water flows off-site. The 2, 5-acre parcels are large enough to accommodate retention of run-off generated.by development of commercial uses. If additional parcels are created, further environmental review will be necessary prior to approval. b. Water supply for the uses permitted by the General Plan Amendment and Rezone would be provided by the California Water Company. The California Water Company indicates that there is an existing water main on the Esplanade and that the company is currently providing the property with a small domestic service connection. California Water indicates that the commercial uses allowed can be provided with water service. No impact is anticipated. g. - I. The property is shown to be outside the area of the 500-year flood according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel #06007C0520C, dated June 8, 1998. No impact shall be incurred with respect to flooding. j. The property is not located in an area prone to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact shall be incurred with respect to these natural hazards. Mitigation: None required. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project? a) Physically divide an'established community? 1t b) Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 18 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? �t c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? K Response: a. The City of Chico indicates that a specific or precise plan may be warranted for development in this area. The City has commented that problems with traffic circulation in the area need to be addressed using an overall development plan. This would enhance circulation, bicycle and pedestrian access and would link future commercial and residential uses with and Shasta Elementary School, along the Esplanade. This would also promote development of a strong mixed-use neighborhood to compliment schools, a future community park proposal to be developed by the Chico Area Recreation District (De Garmo Park), aid the extension of urban facilities and services, and help to develop an appropriate buffer for the Chico Area Greenline. Without a Specific Plan the City staff maintains that further incremental development of the area, as proposed by this General Plan Amendment and Rezone, will result in further circulation and connectivity problems and ultimately create incompatible land uses. The City further indicates that this area represents the only area where the County and City Greenline are at variance. The City explains that, at the time of adoption of the Greenline, the County included a sizable (see Initial Study Checklist Item 2, Agricultural Resources) acreage, west of the Esplanade, on the urban side of the Greenline, despite its agricultural designation and use. The City opted to maintain the land on the agricultural side of the Greenline, until future development was imminent. Recently, the landowner approached the City to request consideration of amending the Sphere of Influence(SOI)to include this additional acreage within the Urban area. City staff included the proposed SOI amendment in the 5-year review of the General Plan, and the City Council directed staff to proceed with processing the amendments. The City of Chico urges the County to table consideration of this proposal until a specific or precise plan can be prepared for the area north of Eaton Road and West of the Esplanade. City staff states that if the County wishes to proceed with this ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 19 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitidation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact proposal, that the County consider an amendment consistent with the City's General Plan and zoning, since it is very likely that this, and surrounding properties will ultimately develop in the City. Although the City's comments are critical to reaching a policy decision regarding the Chico Area Greenline, and other issues as discussed in Initial Study Checklist Item 2, Agricultural Resources, the city has no jurisdictional standing with regard to this property. The City's SOI and Urban Area is adjacent to the property, but does not encompass the property. These policy issues must be discussed by the Planning Commission, in light of the County's own General Plan provisions involving Agricultural Land and compatible land uses. The City's comments will be represented to the Planning Commission for consideration. At this time their is no substantial evidence that the proposal will physically divide an established community, since the City has not established its Sphere of Influence, Urban Area, or City services at this location. b. This project may conflict with polices of the Agriculture Element of the Butte County General Plan. These policies were adopted by Butte County in order to prevent the loss of agricultural land within the County. Loss of agricultural land to development is considered an environmental impact and is discussed under Initial Study Checklist Item 2, Agricultural Resources. C. The proposal will not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents or the state? 1t b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 20 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Response: a. - b. The property is not known to contain any important mineral resources of value to the region. No impact shall be incurred. Mitigation: None required. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? 1t b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels: X c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the.project? X d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 21 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation . Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Response: a. - d. This General Plan Amendment and Rezone project will not cause an increase in noise or expose people to severe noise levels. A subsequent land division or commercial development as a result of this General Plan Amendment and Rezone will result in an increase in noise created on the project site and on the adjacent parcels. Construction noise will be the first new source added to the site that could influence nearby residents. Sources could include heavy equipment, power saws and hammering and can be significant, especially during noise sensitive hours. Construction activities would temporarily generate high noise levels on and adjacent to the project site intermittently during project development activities. This 'construction noise, especially grading equipment, will not have a significant impact on nearby residents because the noise will be intermittent and short-term in nature. Mitigation: None Required. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly(for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure? K b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 1t c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Response: ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 22 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than a Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Butte County population has grown at a rate at or below all official population projections for the past 10 years. Projected population for 1990 was 195,000, while the actual census population was 182,000. The estimated population for January 1, 2000 was 204,046. It is impossible to speculate when the land will be subdivided or when these parcels will become developed. However, based on similar development, build-out may be spread out over several years, and some parcels may be left vacant for an indefinite period of time. In either case this is not considered a significant amount and is consistent with the estimated growth rate for the County of about 2% per year. b. - c. The project will not displace individuals or housing, with the exception of the existing dwelling, which would become a legal non-conforming use. This use would not be allowed to redevelop should it be destroyed. No impact shall be incurred. Mitigation: None required. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically.altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services? 1t b) Fire protection? 1t c) Police Protection? 1t d) schools? x e) Parks? X ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 23 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact f) Other public services? K Response: a. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone may result in land divisions that would allow for two additional homesite. Although this presents an incremental contribution to-the impact on area services, it is not considered significant enough to warrant specific mitigation. b. The Butte County Fire Department/California Department of Forestry indicates that this individual General Plan Amendment and Rezone has no impact on the Fire Department, but the cumulative affect of the General Plan Amendment and Rezone and higher density and differing use results in an incremental increase in demand for fire protection services. Subsequent improvments to the land will be required to provide pressurized water systems capable of producing the necessary fire flow and hydrant spacing approved by the Butte County Fire Department. C. The cumulative impacts of increased development in rural areas impacts the ability of the Sheriffs Department to adequately provide police services to outlying areas. Sheriffs facilities fees will be collected at the time of building permit issuance to offset the cost of proving sheriff services to the new commercial uses developed on the project site. d. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone will not result in additional demands for school facilities. No impact shall be incurred. e. - f. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone may result in future land divisions. This may represent an incremental increase in the demand for maintenance of roads and other public facilities in the area as well as area parks. This is not considered significant due to the fact that this proposal will not contribute additional residents to the area. Mitigation: None required. 14. RECREATION. a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 24 • • Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? )t b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X. Response: a - b. This Commercial development will not contribute additional residents to the area. No impact is anticipated. Mitigation: None required. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. r Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to,the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at y intersections)? 1t b) Exceed, either individually or cumula= tively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 25 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X e) Result in inadequate emergency access? K f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 1t g) Conflict with accepted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? �t Response: a- g. The property is served by the Esplanade, a major county thoroughfare. According to the Butte County Association of Government's 1996 Metropolitan Transportation Plan, 8,200 daily trips occurred on this section of Esplanade in 1996. The Assessment indicates that Esplanade provides for a Level of Service (LOS) of "A." at this location. An LOS .of "A" indicates an unrestricted flow of traffic. This LOS is expected to be maintained until 2016. An LOS of"A" is maintained on the Esplanade until the intersection of East Avenue, approximately 2 miles to the south. At this point it is reduced to an LOS of"C", and reduced further to "F" south of Cohassett Road. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone may contribute additional traffic related impacts. However, it is not anticipated that proposed commercial zone will have any significant traffic impact on this section of the Esplanade. Mitigation: None required. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 26 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Control Board? X b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effedts? X c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,.the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X 0 Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? 1t g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 27 0 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Response: a. The property is currently not provided with sewer service. Any commercial use developed must utilize on-site sewage disposal. The Health Department indicates that wastewater flows exceeding 2,500 gallons/day will require Regional Water Quality Control Board review and approval. No impact is anticipated. b The property receives water supply from the California Water Company. No additional sources will be required. On-site sewage disposal will be developed under the authority of the Environmental Health Department. No impact is anticipated. C. The 2, 5-acre parcels are large enough to accommodate retention of run-off generated by development of commercial uses. If additional parcels are created, further environmental review will be necessary prior to approval. No impact is anticipated. d. The property receives water supply from the California Water Company. No additional sources will be required. No impact is anticipated. e. The property does not receive any sewer service. The closest service is provided by the City of Chico, and is located approximately 2000 feet south of the project area near Eaton Avenue. Service from the City of Chico requires annexation to the City. f The project will increase the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill by a small amount. According to the Butte County Public Works Department, the Neal Road Landfill is expected to reach maximum holding capacity by the year 2018. The project will not have an impact on solid waste disposal. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 28 i Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California hist or prehistory? 7 6 b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively consider- able" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? X c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 1t Response: a. and d. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone will not degrade the environment, or have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings. b. . A Mitigation Measure is proposed which requires a change to the design of the project in order to avoid significant cumulative impacts on agricultural land. Mitigation Measure #1, as itemized under,Section V. is proposed, in order to'reduce cumulative impacts of the project. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division ❑. 29 i • Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 V. MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: Mitigation Measure#1: In accordance with Butte County General Plan Agricultural Program 2.2, an agricultural buffer shall be established 300 feet in width (or of a width determined acceptable by the Planning Commission) along the south, west and north property lines. The buffer shall be labeled as a building site exclusion area. This setback shall be delineated on any future parcel map application, as a condition of recording. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 30 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 DATA SHEET A. Project Description I. Type of Project: General Plan Amendment and Rezone 2. Proposed Density of Development: Proposed zoning would allow for parcels sized acceptable for commercial development and appropriate for Health Department requirements for on-site sewage disposal. 3. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: None proposed. 4. Access and Nearest Public Road: Access is by private driveway, which connects with the Esplanade, a County road. Shirey Court is shown as serving these parcels, but it has not been developed. 5. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic systems. 6. Source of Water Supply: California Water Company 7. Proximity of Power Lines: To property. 8. Potential for further land divisions and development: Proposed zoning would allow for parcels sized acceptable for commercial development and appropriate for Health Department requirements for on-site sewage disposal. Depending upon the land division proposed, the zoning would allow for an increase in the number of parcels, beyond the 20-acre parcel size currently required. .B. Environmental Setting 1. Terrain a General Topographic Character: Level valley b. Slopes: None C. Elevation: 170 feet above sea level. d. Limiting Factors: None. 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics: Vina clay loam on front portion, Farwell clay adobe on balance. b. !Limiting Factors: Less suited for fruit and more suitable for rice production. 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. b. Erosion Potential: None C. Landslide Potential: None d. Fire Hazard: Unclassified -urban area. e. Expansive Soil Potential: Moderate 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water: None. b. Ground Water: Abundant valley aquifers. C. Drainage Characteristics: Gentle sheet flow to southwest. d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 20-22 inches per year. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division 0 31 Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 e. Limiting Factors: None. 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. 7. Air Quality: Good, except when stagnant air conditions persist in the valley. 8. Vegetation: Orchard. 9. Wildlife Habitat: Small birds and animals common to valley areas. 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: High sensitivity area. 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Orchard and Field Crops 12. Existing Zoning: A-20 (Agricultural, 20-acre parcels) 13. Existing Land Use on-site: Orchard and 1,500 sq.ft. dwelling. 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: North, south and west: Orchard and Agricultural uses. East: Commercial, Shasta Elementary School is located to the northeast across the Esplanade. b. Zoning: North, south and west: A-20. East: C-2 (General Commercial) C. General Plan Designation: North, south and west: Orchard and Field Crops. East: Commercial d. Parcel Sizes: North: 51-acre. South: 31-acres. East: 0.4 and 30-acres West: 8.7-acres. 15. Character of Site and Area: Commercial and agricultural area, and school. 16. Nearest Urban Area: City of Chico Urban Area Boundary is adjacent to northeast, across the Esplanade. 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: City of Chico adjacent to the northeast, across the Esplanade (property is not within the City of Chico Sphere of Influence). 18. Improvement Standards Urban Area: Not applicable. 19. Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Station number 41 approximately 2 miles away. b. Water Availability: Fire tankers only. 20. Schools: Chico Unified School District. ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element, Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: C112M Hill, 1977. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1, Safety Element. Oroville, CA CH2M Hill, 1977. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 32 • Project:Harold Ball General Plan Amendment and Rezone 00-04 5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville, CA:. James P. Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Map. Oroville, CA. 11. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency, State of California, 1983. 12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map,_established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1989. 14. USGS Quad Maps. > 15. Soil Map; Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area..United States Department of Agriculture. 16. Soil Survey of Chico (1925)/Oroville(1926)Area. United States Department of Agriculture.- 17. griculture.17. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division 0 33 AM' BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on Thursday, July 13, 2000, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive,,Oroville, California, regarding the following item: ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MITIGATION MEASURES REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED 9:30 a.m. - Harold Ball, General Plan Amendment and Rezone. General Plan Amendment from Orchard&Field Crops General Plan designation to a Commercial General Plan designation, and Rezone from A-20 (Agricultural, 20-acre parcels) to C-2 (General Commercial), on two 5-acre parcels. The property is located west of and adjacent to the Esplanade, approximately one-quarter mile southeast of Nord Highway, at 3395 Esplanade, Chico, APN 006-690-012 & 013.(DB) (File#GPAIRZ 00-04) The above mentioned application,Initial Study, and map are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Development Services Department, Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. For information call: (530) 538-7601 (Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) Comments may be submitted in writing at any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. Upon action taken by the Planning Commission on the project an appeal may be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. The appeal period is 10 days. If you challenge the above application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION THOMAS A. PARILO, DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Friday, June 23, 2000. Phone conversation with City of Chico planner Tom Hayes, May 8, 8000 -GPA/RZ 00-04 * City Counsel just gave staff direction to amend the sphere to make it consistent with County greenline. (the City greenline would then become the County Greenline.) * Not currently prezoned, but indiates that City desires to create a specific plan for area, which will be a planned mixed-use community, when the site is annexed. When the sphere is formally amended it will be prezoned for this use. * Although the area should include commercial development, the proposal would hinder future planning efforts. The proposal is narrow and deep in relation to the Esplanade, and is not conducive'to proper circulation. * Sewer line is approximately '/z mile away at Eaton Road. BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 County Center Drive V (� Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 n FAX (530) 538-7785 to: Rick Rodriguez, NorthStar Engineering fax#: 893-2113 from: Dan Breedon, Senior Planner date: May 8, 2000 subject: Comments Received, -Ball GPA/RZ 00-04 pages: 9, including cover NOTES: See attached. G0°ntY Ai, po0 2525 Dominic Drive,Suite J Lawrence D.Odle Chico,California 95928 : Air Pollution Control Officer (530)891-2882aha ,S�t� W.James Wagoner (530)891.2878 Fax ement Asst.Air Polution Control Officer April 12, 2000 Daniel Breedon, Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: GPA/RZ-00-04 Dear Mr. Breedon: The District has reviewed the request for comments for a rezone on property located on the west side of the Esplanade in Chico. Based on the information submitted the District has no comments at this time. The District will review and submit comments as specific development is proposed. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed project. If you have any questions, please contact me at 891-2882. Sincerely, ` Gail Williams Air Quality Planner RIETEI V ED File No 3451.1 APR 14 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION f:\apps\Wpdocs\eir\bcgparz0004.doc BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: CDF FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application:Harold Ball,GPA/RZ 00-04 DATE: March 28,2000 CONTACT PERSON:Dan Breedon The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a General Plan Amendment from Orchard and Field Crops to Commercial and a Rezone from A- 20 (Agricultu al-20 acrean rcel) to C-2 (General Commercial) on property zoned A-20 (Agricultural-20 acreap rce11 located on the west side of the Esplanade, identified as APN 006-690-012 &013. Supervisorial District No.?. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - _DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON July 13 , 2000. COMMENTS,IF ANY,ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN April 12,2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): 44 1 11 17 17 Mau /r V .1 .'t.t, iL. CAZo1 1 - AAZU Lk kiff By: t►1! Date: (J RECEIVED MAR 3 0 2000 7 County Center Drive -Oroville. California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7755 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION r- BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: LAFCo FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application:Harold Ball,GPA/RZ 00-04 DATE: March 28,2000 CONTACT PERSON: Dan Breedon The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a General Plan Amendment from Orchard and Field Crops to Commercial and a Rezone from A- 20 (Agricultural-20 acre parcel) to C- (General Commercial) on property zoned A-20 (Agricultural-20 acreap rcel) located on the west side of the Esplanade,identified as APN 006-690-012&013. Supervisorial District No.-2. Nz- OS THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - _DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON July 13 ,2000. COMMENTS,IF ANY,ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN Aprii 12,2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): I. C5A M Ih 7. CSA ZS e Cywtmere;ml USGS 0%w to LA hize seyj,,r S6rv''iGG M o o Cz+ of Ck' + ghidoAiw Pa k+2� nc,. u Go..y[vs:sv. n� as IGn IS wc,Vta�,,trt Ivle �Ftal) S. Oyp ��/I�ffl.cd S•D• a0dZi la6i ri1-l1 OP lt„I,a., Strvice s. / C 11 6. � � collie O Ih C/•iH.t i G+,enI wl coAvers;Aa Oolic;!s of Ott �. c 5 Irk RECEIVED By: J �... [chi Date: 4- 3- 0o A nD A h2000 RuTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 - 530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 0 t3 <I BUTTE COUNTY u 0 U DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 3 0 200p r TO: City of Chico 3 FROM: Butte CountyPlanning Division pLANh, OF CH1C0 - g 1, G�nlvr.4►�N RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application:Harold Ball, GPA/RZ 00-04 DATE: March 28,2000 CONTACT PERSON: Dan Breedon The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your'agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame.given,or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a General Plan Amendment from Orchard and Field Crops to Commercial and a Rezone from A- 20 (Agricultural-20 acre parcel) to C-2 (General Commercial) on property zoned A-20 (Agricultural-20 acrean rcel) located on the west side of the Esplanade, identified as APN 006-690-012&013. Supervisorial District No.-2. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - _DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON July 13 ,2000. COMMENTS,IF ANY,ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN April 12,2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): AtCh ED ArK i 3 2000 nu TE uOUNTY PLANNIN(, r)r,-rrTON By: Date: 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 - 530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 �. . . ,.�,^..� '�,!; a i ... . .. , -� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING -� 411 Main Street CITYoFCHICO P.O. Box 3420 INC.187Z Chico, CA 95927 (530)895-4851 FAX(530)895-4726 ATSS 459-4851 City of Chico P.O. Box 3420, 411 Main Street Chico, CA 95927 (95928, street) (530) 895-4853 April 5, 2000 Dan Breedon Department of Development Services Butte County 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Subject: Harold Ball GPA/Rz 00-04 Dear Mr. Breedon: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced proposed General Plan and rezone amendment. It is our understanding that the proposed property, 3395 Esplanade (Assessor's Parcel No. 006-690-012 and 013) is approximately 10 acres in size and located on the west side of the Esplanade, south of Nord Highway. The property is now designated Orchard and Field Crops in the County General Plan and zoned A-20 (Agricultural-20 acre minimum parcel size). The property is located on the urban side of the County's adopted greenline in this location. The City' General Plan designates the subject property Medium Density Residential with prezoning of R2 Medium Density Residential district. Interestingly;the area west of the subject property is the only instance where the City and County's greenlines are at variance. At the time of adoption of the Greenline, the County included a sizable acreage, westof the subject site, on the urban side of the Greenline despite its agricultural designation and use. The City opted to maintain the land on the agricultural side of the line,until at a future time when development was imminent. Recently, the land owner approached the City to request consideration of amending the Sphere of Influence(SOI)to include this additional acreage within the urbanizing area. City staff included the proposed SOI amendment in the Five-Year g�� Made From Recycled Paper r i • Review of the General Plan, and the City Council directed staff to proceed with processing the amendments. It is the City staff's position that further incremental development of this area without an area or precise plan will add to existing circulation and connectivity problems and ultimately create incompatible land uses. Allowing development in advance of such planning,will make it impossible to establish a well designed neighborhood area providing good access and a mix of uses scaled to serve the area. With an elementary school, future community park and a large office park nearby it makes sense to require that the subject property and the surrounding area be planned together. The City urges the County to table consideration of this proposal until an area or precise plan can be prepared for the area north of Eaton Road and west of the Esplanade. If the County wishes to proceed that it consider amendment consistent with the City's General Plan designation and zoning, since it is very likely that this, and surrounding properties, will ultimately develop in the City. The City is not opposed to a community or neighborhood commercial development in this area. However,we believe that it must be planned as an integral component with other existing and future development in order to serve as a unifying factor for the neighborhood. Such an approach will ensure good vehicular, as well as pedestrian and bicycle access and compatibility with future and existing uses in the area. Please contact me if you have questions or wish additional information. Tom Hayes, 895-4853, email: thayes@ci.chico.ca.us. Sincerely, Ao*avyles Senior Planner cc: CM/CDD/PID/CDA b FiwlmwenW Health MAR 2 2 2000 BUTTE COUNTY Chico, Califomia DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES RECEIVED PLANNING DIVISION APR 0 4 2000 TO: Environmental Health,Chico FROM: Butte County Planning Division BUTTE COUNTY RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application:Harold Ball,GPA/RZ 00-04 PLANNING DIVISION DATE: March 21,2000 CONTACT PERSON: The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed,please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a General Plan Amendment from Orchard and Field Crops to Commercial and a Rezone from A-0(Agricultural-20 acre are)to C- (General Commercial)on property zoned A-20(Agricultural-20 acrean mf,4 located on the west side of the Esplanade,identified as APN 006-690-012&013. Supervisorial District No.-2. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON July 13, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THANrn it 4, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENT (Attach additio 1 pa) )es if necessary): /1JdrWAjVM k PF 4t la C,avu It mkz� Of G y ' By: Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 -530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: California Water Service Co. FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application:Harold Ball,GPA/RZ 00-04 DATE: March 28,2000 CONTACT PERSON:Dan Breedon The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a General Plan Amendment from Orchard and Field Crops to Commercial and a Rezone from A- 20 (Agricultural-20 acreparcel) to - (General Commercial) on property zoned A-20 (Agricultural-20 acrean rcel). located on the west side of the Esplanade,identified as APN 006-690-012 &013. Supervisorial District No.2. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON July 13 ,2000. COMMENTS,IF ANY,ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN April 12,2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY HAS AN EXISTING WATER MAIN IN THE ESPLANADE AND IS CURRENTLY SERVING THE PROPERTY WITH A SMALL DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE. WE HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED REZONE. WE CAN SERVE THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY WITH WATER SERVICE IT REQUIRED. By: Date: 4/5/00 KATHERINE HUTCHISON, CHIEF CLERK .DECEIVED APR 0 6 2000 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 - 530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION i flu*Assessor's office BUTTE COUNTY MAR 2 y 2000 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION Oroville,California TO: Assessor FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application:Harold Ball,GPA/RZ 00-04 DATE: March 28,2000 CONTACT PERSON: Dan Breedon The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a General Plan Amendment from Orchard and Field Crops to Commercial and a Rezone from A- 20 (Agricultural-20 acreparcel) to C-2 general Commercial) on property zoned A-20 (Agricultural-20 acrean rcell located on the west side of the Esplanade,identified as APN 006-690-012&013. Supervisorial District No.2. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON July 13 ,2000. COMMENTS,IF ANY,ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN April 12,2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additions pages if necessary): ARR 30 DECEIVED By. air Date: APR u 3 2000 RrrmTE COUNTY PLANNli',TG DIVISION 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 - 530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785' i Pacific Gas and Electric Company 460 Rio Lindo Avenue On Chambers Chico,CA 95926 Chico Land Rights Office 530/894-4423 FAX 530/894-4414 April 7, 2000 Mr. Daniel Breedon Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 RE: General Plan Amendment and Rezone- (Harold Ball) FILE: GPA/RZ 00-04 Dear Mr. Breedon: We have reviewed the plans regarding the subject project. PG&E has no objections to the subject matter. Any relocation or rearrangement of our existing facilities to accommodate development, will be at the expense of the developer. There shall be no building of structures or the storage of any materials allowed over or under any existing PG&E facilities or easements. Thank you for the opportunity to review this matter. If you have any questions,please call me in Chico at 894-4423. Sincerely, �2. Donald W. Chambers Land Agent (file: GPARZ00-04.doc) RECEIVED APR 10 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION �GO�G�DI.EY*pR0 i BUTTE COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS 9 A 479-A Oro Dam Boulevard, Oroville, California 95965 CSA m (530) 538-6866 FAX: (530) 538-6868 Internet Address: http://www.bcag.org MEMORANDUM DATE: APRIL 5, 2000 TO: DAN BREEDON,BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION FROM: CHRIS DEVINE,BCAG STAFF SUBJECT: Development Application: Harold Ball, GPA/RZ 00-04 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced project. BCAG has no comments on the project at this time. If you have any questions or need additional assistance,please feel free to call at the number listed above. RECEIVED APR 10 2000 BUTTE.COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION An Association of the County of Butte,the City of Biggs,the City of Chico,the City of Gridley,the City of Oroville and the Town of Paradise LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: GPA/RZ 00-04 AP# 006-690-012 & 013 APPLICANT: Harold Ball, 6846 W. Waverly, Redding, CA 96001 OWNER: Shirey Family Living Trust, 10675 Bryne Avenue, Los Molinos, CA 96055 REPRESENTATIVE: NorthStar Engineering, 20 Declaration Drive, Chico, CA,95973 REQUEST: General Plan Amendment from Orchard and Field Crops to Commercial and a Rezone from A-20 (Agricultural-20 acreparcel) to C-2 (General Commercial) SIZE: 10 acres LOCATION: on the west side of the Esplanade SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT # 2_EXISTING ZONING: A-20 (Agricultural-20 acre parcel) ZONING HISTORY: SURROUNDING ZONING: Orchards, mixed commercial SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Orchard &Field Crops APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Date Rec'd 3-15-00 i COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST APPLICATION: Harold Ball DATE: March 21, 2000 County Offices and Cities: J _ / Chief Administrative Officer _X_/ D elop.Services Director _X_" Public Works Director X Environmental Health X ssessor uilding Manager Sheriff J /BCAG V/11""Chico LUC _X_ LAFCo ,/ Air Quality Mgmt. Butte Co.Farm Bureau Biggs Gridley Oroville _ Paradise _ / Chico Airport Commission Animal Control _X_ Agricultural Commission Irrigation District: Butte Water _ Biggs/W.Gridley Water _ Durham Irrigation OWID _ Paradise Irrigation _ Richvale Irrigation Table Mountain Irrigation _ Thermalito Irrigation _ Other Domestic Water _ Butte Water District _ California Water Service Co. _ Del Oro Water Co. OWID _ Thermalito Irrigation District _ Other Sewer Butte Water District _ Themalito Irrigation _ Sterling City Sewer Main Skansen Subdivision(CSA 21) _ L.O.A.PUD Fire Protection _X_ / California Department of Forestry _ El Medio Fire Protection District Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Durham Area Recreation _ Feather River Rec.&Park Paradise Recreation&Park Richvale Recreation &Parks Utilities PG&E North-Chico — Chambers Cable TV — Pacific Bell PG&E South-Oroville Viacom Cable TV State Agencies CalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept.of Water Resources _ Dept.of Fish and Game Forestry(Attn:Craig Carter) _ Dept of Parks and Rec. _ Highway Patrol Central Reg.Water Quality Cont _ Caltrans,Aeronautics Program Department of Conservation _ Off.of Mining Reclamation . _ Off.of Governmental&Env.Relations Dept.Social Services,Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management _ US Fish&Wildlife Service Army Corps of Engineers Other Districts,Agencies,Committees,etc. Lime'Saddle Dist _ Community Association _ Mosq.Abatement.Oroville/Butte Co Drainage _ Butte Env.l Council _ Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society Butte Co.Mining Committee _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. Butte Ck.Watershed Conservancy_ School Districts BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Harold Ball,GPA/RZ 00-04 DATE: March 21,2000 CONTACT PERSON: The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed,please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a General Plan Amendment from Orchard and Field Crops to Commercial and a Rezone from A-20(Agricultural-20 acre parcel)to (General Commercial)on property zoned A-20(Agricultural-20 acre parcel) located on the west side of the Esplanade,azn nade, identified as APN 006-690-012&013. Supervisorial District No.2. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON Ju1T13,2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN April 4, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 -530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Harold Ball DATE: March 21, 2000 AGENT: NorthStar Engineering APN: 006-690-012 & 013 FILE #: GPA/RZ 00-04 PLANNER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: General Plan Amendment from Orchard and Field Crops to Commercial and a Rezone from A-20 (Agricultural-20 acre parcel) to C-2 (General Commercial) Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS H. BUILDING PERMITS 1. Prior to building permit issuance for a new residential dwelling unit(s), the applicant shall pay all . applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time of acceptance of the application. Such fees, shall include, but not be limited to: Park Fee, School Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees,Water and Sewer Service Fees, and Fire Protection Fees. 2. Prior to building permit issuance for a new commercial or industrial development,or addition to an existing development,the applicant shall pay all applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time of acceptance of the application. Such fees shall include,but not be limited to: School Fee, Drainage Fee,Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, and Fire Protection Fees. I. EXISTING STRUCTURES Comply with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use,area and fire- resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing building(s)shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended new use of the building(s)or the existing building(s)shall be demolished. BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Harold Ball DATE: March 21 2000 AGENT: NorthStar Engineering APN: 006-690-012 & 013 FILE #: GPA/RZ 00-04 PLANNER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: General Plan Amendment from Orchard and Field Crops to Commercial and a Rezone from A-20 (Agricultural-20 acre parcel) to C-2 (General Commercial) Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS J. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit B" and dated _, 19_and is incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits,the plans,incorporating all applicable conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division to verify compliance with said conditions of approval. 3. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high solid masonry wall with view obstructing gates and a solid or semi-open shade cover. Plans to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to construction. 4. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,pursuant to this permit, conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 5. All electrical and mechanical equipment,including but not limited to air conditioning units, electrical boxes,transformers,and backflow preventers, shall be screened from public view. Screening shall be to the satisfaction of the Planning Division and in compliance with the Building Division. K. LANDSCAPING 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan consistent with the project site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. A plan of the existing on-site mature trees,located in any area proposed for buildings and vehicular access,shall be provided to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits and/or prior to grading or vegetation removal. The applicant shall minimize the removal of mature trees,where possible. A mature tree shall be defined as a tree with a trunk measuring 4 inches in diameter,4 feet from ground level. Mature trees removed shall be replaced b plantingreplacement trees of equal number and not less p by P q than_gallon size. 3. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds,trash, and debris,during the term of this permit. T w 0 4. All graded slopes, over 5 feet in height, or on slopes greater than_%, shall be seeded,planted, mulched or hydroseeded or otherwise protected to prevent erosion. A permanent irrigation system shall be installed for non-native vegetation. A one year Faithful Performance bond shall be posted to guarantee installation and established growth. 5. In parking lots of commercial and industrial development,trees of not less than 15 gallon size shall be provided to reduce heat gain from the paved surface and to soften the visual impact of the paved area.Such trees shall be planted at a minimum density of one tree every three parking spaces. Tree species shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to planting. 6. Prior to the commencement of grading and/or construction activity,all individual or groups of oak trees which are to be retained as part of the project, shall be fully protected through the use of root protection zones (RPZ). During construction, RPZs shall be established using protective fencing enclosing an area with a radius 1.5 times the distance from the trunk to the dripline. Within this protective buffer,no grading, trenching, fill, or vegetation alteration of any kind shall be allowed. The RPZs shall be maintained after the completion of construction in order to continue to protect the oak trees,but the fencing shall be removed. L. GRADING 1. During construction,should any archaeological artifacts be discovered,the Planning Division shall be notified immediately, and all work shall cease until a qualified archaeologist has examined the artifacts and the site and submitted his or her findings to the Planning Division, and recommended clearance to continue. Recommencement of construction shall be upon the approval of the Planning Division.Archaeological artifacts are defined as follows: 2. Prior to any clearing,grading and/or construction in a Federal or State identified 100 year floodplain and/or streambed the following entitlements must be obtained: a California Fish and Game 1604 Streambed Alteration permit and an Army Corps 404 permit or exemption certificate. M. ADDITIONAL APPROVALS 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits payment of the North Oroville/Thermalito Traffic Impact Fees shall be made. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for each new or additional living unit the applicant shall execute the Oroville Area Traffic Mitigation Fee Agreement and pay the established fee. 3. Prior to the issuance of the Use Permit,to insure the maintenance and continuance of the orchard or other agricultural use of the property, the property owner shall enter into the County approved Orchard Management Agreement. The agreement shall terminate in 10 years or upon a rezoning of the parcel/lot to a zone other than A-5 through A-160. The agreement shall be recorded and recording fees paid by the applicant. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable State and County laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit application. 5. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at the end of which time it shall expire(unless the approving authority has held a hearing thereon and granted an extension. In connection with such an extension the approving authority may add, change, or delete conditions. 6. Approval of this Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void if the use for which it has been granted is not established within two calendar year from the date of approval. No formal cancellation or revocation action by the County will be necessary. 7. The developer shall display a current County Zoning and County Land Use Map in the sales office at all times,and/or suitable alternatives. 8. Approval of this application does not become effective unless,prior to 4:00 p.m. on _, 199_1 the applicant shall sign and file with the Department of Development Services an Indemnity Agreement in a form satisfactory to the County Counsel. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or prior to the issuance of a Use Permit for a Mobile Home Park the Sheriff Facilities Impact Fee shall be paid,pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3,Article II of the Butte County Code. The fee amount shall be determined and calculated as of the date of application for building permit. 10. Prior to the issuance of the Use Permit the applicant or property owner shall sign and record the CSA 87 Traffic and Drainage Mitigation Agreement or pay the required fees prior to the issuance of the Use Permit. 11. Prior to the issuance of the Use Permit,the applicant shall contact the Butte County Tax Collector's Office to begin the process of a Transient Occupancy Registration Certificate. A Transient Occupancy Registration Certificate shall be required within ten(10)days after commencing business for a motel, hotel, inn, tourist home, bed and breakfast, rooming house, apartment house, mobile home park,recreational vehicle park,campground,or parking area(See Chapter 23A). 12. Prior to the issuance of the Use Permit,the applicant shall pay all outstanding County fees. '/� vv I�'Zs� 3'-�I(o ISZ 3ovo=. �,,o' ��• c.r� /3�K-tom �lc�r.-res � �.� RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC PUBLIC ENV. NOEMOD DATE NO. RECEIVED WORKS LAFCO PLANNING SALES HEALTH FIRE F!G FEE OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM RECEIPT 18258 Z OFFICIAL RECEIPT r, COUNTY OF BUTTE C= >,OSTATE OF CALIFORNIA C= .Z� OFFICE OF PLANNING h-� u-, O A r- U O c>c H 0-4 z ISSU BY �z �a a 1:8522' MAP,4980CIATES,; INC ' .r NORTH•STATE NATIONAL BANK dba NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING CHICO,CA , ' 530 893-1600 - 903896/1211 20 DECLARATION DRIVE. CHICO,CA 95973 3/9/001 B PAY TOTHE,,; •t ORDER OF: County of Butte $ < .3,496:00 ThreeThonsandFour,Hun dredNinety-Sixaad_00/100•• ••••••••••••••s••••s •.••••ia•.••s••••••.•••••••••.•.••.•• '.' DOLLARS County of Butte 8 25 County Center Drive, 95965 MAP ASSOCIATES INC dba NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING," Oroville,CA • MEMO a o Dslo E AV Harold Ball Rezone APP(Made-check Payable to NSE) 1180 185 2 2116 1: 12113139611: 0600 1170 10 rim acLol ?ice CG .7 v. I%. t L. m.u.�.►.w.... v v v./ .'*PEIVED 2 2 2000 1'=500' 4TY OF SUM % i3 -VELOPMENT ON r i F6-8 ti 12 �% L/4 COR --------------------- 3100 340 1 1 660�0 1 id , `%% I1 — • 1 � 3724 AC �`9A O 11.05 Ac 9A0 Ac 1a79 Ac 11; 1373 Ac s , 19 O �y II — ----------- Q� �1 &17 AC t� r 21 FQ' F6-7 , GQ` 21 20.00 Act �\ 20 ` 761 f6 f/4 / 11 201-70 60070 j 70000 9 3, f.70Ae 22 �• f Alt' 277Ae 24- 8 '� ry/� 4 25 O _44s9 Act � /% Q �• 10.00 ACt 21.43 AC c 1 1 r t 997 Aft Cdr 16 70M • 4 g .r,: 6A70 M70 � Me County Assemor s Jlkp Book 06, Page 69 27 NOTE These parcels are for assessment purposes only and may not constitute legs!pmeelrss CREATED SY ST CREATED ON 10-28-1999 Fiaf.f�ei� s�: C�1�i1T REVISED 8Y DORERY 0 M/x/0100-28-1999 ` EFFECflVE —01 ROLL is BROOKE ESTATES 9 M.O.R. 37 ' ". MAR --� 2��0 Provoes soak os, Pbrtlon Of P o2 ` led the Butte AneOW S MCC Oroviite,California