Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPRED 00-04_PLANNING i� SEPARATOR SHEET APN �4n - 3S0 -0/ 6 PROJECT NUMBER `i PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE#: PRF.D 00-04 PROJECT TYPE: Pre-Development Conference APPLICANT: J&J Electric ADDRESS: 549 Mission Santa Fe Circle, Chico, CA 95926 OWNER: Same ADDRESS: REPRESENTATIVE: ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pre-Development Conference to review flexible lot design, creatine 14 lots. PROPERTY ZONED: SR-1 ( Suburban Residential, 1 acreap rcel) LOCATED: on the south west side of Highway 99 on both sides of Estates Drive AP#: 040-350-016, 017, &018/040-020-159 TOWN/AREA: Chico GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LDR(Low Density Residential) 1. Application complete: 1-26-00 Amount: S 243.00 Receipt#: 18158 2. Comments sent to: E.H., LAFCo,DDS.,P.W., CalTrans, Chico,PG&E North- Chico, CDF., F&G, &CHP 3. Comments received from: 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 6. Assigned To: Craig Sanders 7. Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No: Categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Subject to Fish&Game: Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. -CEQA# 15061.(bx3) Other 8. Staff Report: Project Video: 9. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: 10. Publication Notice Written: Display Ad Prepared: 11. Notices Mailed: Number of Notices: 12. Newspaper Publication Date: O C P G B 13. Planning Commission Hearing(s): Action taken: Special Conditions: Commission Resolution No. 14. Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: 15. Type Use Permit/Send for signature: 16. MO'E. /N.O.D./APPENDIX G: Fish& Game Fees Paid: Yes No 17. Send validated Use Permit: 18. Assessor's Memo: 19. Copy of Use Permit/Variance to Planning Technician: DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICA.M: Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME(If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: Fe -3S— 16 1.7 IP Ski—o2—' i ADDRESS: C CITY,STATE dt ZIP CODE: FILE—NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT(If any) TELEPHONE LOCATION OF PROJECT(Major cross streets and Address, if any) GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED w OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS: CITY,STATE dt ZIP CODE: SAIIAr✓ i ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE(in Square Feet or Acres) SR-1 LDR v 14+ Ac, irE, '. EXISTIIJG STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) tJ �� 14 S•� �� -�, 1 Cw-c,l<< (Check One) (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER j PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION REQUESTED ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT t' [3 TENTATIVE[,�� a TENTATIVE PARCELMAP MAP [3 REZONE ��j, �j v ❑ USE PERMIT . Nt JAN 2 6 2000 ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL. MAP ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT ❑ BOUNDARY LME MODIFICATION ❑ VARIANCE BUTTE CO'JNTI N ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION pLANNIN ❑ MINOR VARIANCE ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ MIIJING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OTHER Acp?Q6Ar 110N PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT(Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division ,describe the number and size of parcels.) OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER UF'nili AHUVE DESCR18ED PRUPEXTY. FURTHER,I AC)LNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABUVE INFURMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be aurhorizs execute an stTidavit of suthorizatioo and include the sH'icavit with this applicauun.) DATE: SIGNATURE: to NSI 44 pq bO x 04 o o NV Q r o a A �+ t0ri C W •O 'Z3 $ v Q � w �► •� et-'ai � 0 3 � Q � ° N � V q V .00 93 •� orCA t •�' 1° o M � p, o I V V 'd cpd >40. O o i o •U ; •° pq o �, u ►. �� x ~ � 'd '' .•H ani � o. 0 p on •n h.o .� v � .d "V � p W •® Yw � V � � � v J2 � 42 wo } U � � p.u p Ccd � � •?� Zy � O V � w V Count LAN D OF NATURAL W E A L T H AN D BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916)538-7601 FAX: 1916)538-7785 March 7, 2000 J& J Electric 549 Mission Santa Fe Circle Chico, CA 95926 Re: Pre-development conference 02/15/2000 Dear Mr. Laffins, This letter is a follow up to the pre-development conference held on February 15, 2000. In attendance at the meeting were: Dick Jones - representative for the project Bob Greenlaw - Butte County Public Works Craig Erickson -Butte County Environmental Health Craig Sanders -Butte County Development Services The main points of discussion that resulted from the meeting are as follows: The property is subject to a Conditional Zoning Agreement. A copy of the agreement is attached. The conditions in the agreement must be met in your development design. Butte County Environmental Health strongly recommends that the project have a source of community water and not individual wells. Hooking up to Butte Creek Country Club is one option for providing water. You will also have to show that the proposed leachfield area is not within the 10 year flood plain. Both the Department of Public Works and the City of Chico commented that the intersection of the proposed road and Estates Drive should be located as far as possible from Highway 99 and-be at a right angle to Estates Drive. On-site detention of drainage will be required so that peak flows off the site will not be increased. Your tentative map should show the location of the detention area. 1 .r r The entire ' � este is s within a 100 year flood plain. Development will have to comply with Butte County ordinances for development in flood plains. Building pads must be constructed so that the lowest floor elevation is at least 1 foot above the flood plain. Your tentative map should show the what the lowest floor elevation.is for each lot. P.G.&E requests that the 50 foot right-of-way be dedicated to include utilities. In addition, 10 foot strip along all lot lines fronting the road should be similarly dedicated. It appears that the existing 60 foot easement coming off of Estates Drive has been abandoned by a document recorded in Book 2377 at Page 491. If the sound wall is to be 11 feet high, the homes on these parcels should be restricted to single story dwellings to maintain sound protection. These comments are intended to help you design your map so that it will conform the various department and agency requirements when you make formal application: If you have any questions or need clarification on any points, please call me. Sincerely, Craig Sanders Senior Planner 2 " 0 - 35155 fEQUESTED BY' 'v 7-V ' 90-035155 ; Total . 00 • L?��,��� v� rye Recorded Official Records ; County of Butte Candace J. Grubbs Recorder 8:02am 16-Aug-90 ; CD 4 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this T1, day ofJuly , 1990, by and between "First Party", as identified in item (a) of Exhibit 1 of this Agreement, and the COUNTY OF BUTTE, a.political subdivision of the State of California, herein called "Second Party". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, First Party is the owner of real property, herein called the "Property", situated in the County of Butte, which Property is described in Item (f) of Exhibit I of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Property is now zoned as specified in Item (b) of Exhibit 1; and WHEREAS, First Party has applied for a reclassification of zoning of the Property pursuant to which application the Property is being reclassified from its present classification to the classification or classifications specified in Item (c) of Exhibit 1; and WHEREAS, public hearings have been held upon said application before the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, and after having considered the matter presented, it has been determined that certain conditions to the zoning reclassification of said real property must be imposed so as not to create any problems inimical to the health, safety and the general welfare of the County of Butte. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that inasmuch as the reclassification specified in Item (c) of Exhibit 1 is being granted, the said reclassification shall be subject to the conditions specified in the following paragraphs: 1. That Exhibit 1, as completed and attached hereto,is incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. 2. That First Party shall construct and comply with all the following conditions: 2a. At the time of a submittal for a tentative map or development proposal, the applicant shall provide a map that identifies all existing trees and riparian vegetation in relation to roads and building pad locations. All native vegetation that is not impacted by roads or structures shall be preserved. 2b. Development of the site shall comply with the sewerage disposal requirements of the County Environmental Health Department. Grading of the topsoil shall be minimized, especially at the north end of the project to enhance the sewage disposal capabilities. 2c. Any proposed roads that cross the Durham Mutual Ditch shall be approved by the Department of Fish and Game. 2d. A sound attenuation wall of at least 6 feet in height and a landscape visual buffer of fast-growing trees and shrubs (such as Oleander, Hopbrush, Aleppo Pine, or Poplars) shall be provided along State Highway 99 frontage. The barrier is to be designed such that noise will be Fa T 90 - 35155 reduced to 65 dB or less at the property lines of parcels fronting on Highway 99. 2e. Obtain.a written approval from Caltrans relative to Estates Drive access and provide an easement for a future frontage road that complies with Caltrans requirements for width and location. 2f. A permanent solution for drainage, including the protection of downstream properties from any flooding. This shall be provided at the time of tentative map or development submittal. 2g. Incorporate "pollution traps" into the storm drain design near the point of discharge to minimize impacts during low flows. 2h. Comply with energy conservation measures as set forth in the Uniform Building Code and Section 66473.1 of the Subdivision Map Act. 3. In the event First Party, any successor in interest of First Party, or any person in possession of the property described in Item (f) of Exhibit I violates or fails to perform any of the conditions of this Agreement within thirty (30) days after notice thereof as provided in Paragraph 5, the Board of Supervisors of Second Party may instruct the County Counsel of Second Party to institute legal proceedings to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. The Board of Supervisors of Second Party may also initiate proceedings to rezcne the property to the classification specified in Item (b) of Exhibit I or any other suitable classification. 4. Notice of violation of provisions of this Agreement shall be sent to First Party at the address specific in Item (d) of Exhibit 1 and to the street address of the property described in Item (d) of Exhibit 1. Any subsequent title holder, any lien holder, or party in possession of the property shall also receive notice of such violation at an address,other than as specified in Item (d) of Exhibit 1 by filing with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Second Party the address to which the notice is to be sent, with reference to this Agreement and the Resolution authorizing its execution. 5. In the event suit is brought by the County Counsel of Second Party to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, First Party agrees to pap to Second Party a reasonable sum to be fixed by the Court as attorney's fees. 6. Each and every one of the provisions of this agreement herein contained shall ind'and insure to the benefit of the successor in interest of each and every party hereto, in the same manner as if they had herein been expressly named. 90 - 35155. -� IN WITNESS•WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. Ron LaffinYV ,-Q� t ,-,a: Rick Laffins UV COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political subdivision of t1he State of California ln� 01 By � Chairperson of the B and of Supervisors JUL 24 19PP "Second Party" ATTEST: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ervisors CAT. NO. NNO0627 T° ,eaa CA 19-84► J TICOR TITLE INSURANCE Individual) ; STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF Butte } SS. On July 27, 1990 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for m said State, personally appeared Ron Laf fires & Rick Laf f iris x m , personally known to meo BO DADQDiD6DD94027;DanaaDDDyDaDD:D�aD:nB:DD:utenees� J proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to 1* U s p I C i A+ S s A G the person whose name s are subscribed to t9i , ` . �F '`'", N'EUNDA DALEY within instrument and acknowledged that they ext NOTARY auou: — CALIFORNIA , COUNTY OF BUTTE cuted the same. Comm. Exp. Feb. 22, 1991 WITNESS my hand and official seal. nie� DeuDDaiieiDDieateaoee�D:zaDDD�aDDDwDD�DuuDeDDEi� /7 Signature C ✓ K/ (This area for official notarial seal) i EXHIBIT 'l Agreement (a) "First Party", as used in this Agreement, includes each and all of the following: Ron and Rick Laffins. (b) The property is now zoned: PA-C. (c) The zoning reclassification of the property is from its present zoning to: SR-1. (d) Notice to First Party pursuant to Paragraph No. 4 shall be addressed to: Ron and Rick Laffins, 275 Fairchild, Space 100A, Chico, CA 95926. (e) The change in zoning classification pursuant to Paragraph No. 4 shall be to: SR-1. (f) 'Property", as used in this Agreement, includes: All that certain real property situate in the State of California, County of Butte, described as follows: Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4, as shown on that certain parcel map, recorded in the office of the recorder of the County of Butte, State of California, on March 27, 1979, in Book 70 of Maps, at Page 74. END OF DOCUMENT count. ..... u to '��.. LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY ' PLANNING DIVISION x>hyYn �'E• y DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net January 31, 2000 To Whom It May Concern: The Butte County Development Service Department has received a request for a pre-development conference regarding a proposed Pre-Development Conference to review flexible lot design, creating 1.4 lots. The parcel is located on the south west side of Highway 99 on both sides of Estates Drive. The purpose of the meeting is to inform the applicant of local or state requirements that may apply to their project. This allows the applicant to incorporate those requirements into the design of the project when the actual application is made. The pre-development conference will be held in the Development Services Department conference room located at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville on February 15, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. If your department has concerns or comments regarding the proposal, please have someone attend or submit written comments to this department prior to the meeting. Comments maybe faxed to (530)538-7785 attention Craig Sanders. If you have.any questions please contact me at (530)538-7601. Sincerely, Craig Sanders Senior Planner Enclosures cc: Butte County Environmental Health Butte County Local Agency Formation Commission Butte County Department of Development Services Butte County Public Works CalTrans City of Chico PG&E North- Chico California Department of Forestry Department of Fish && Game California Highway Patrol -� to, coun LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net January 31, 2000 J & J Electric 549 Mission Santa Fe Circle Chico, CA 95926 Subject: Pre-Development Conference to review flexible lot design, creating 14 lots i Dear J & J Electric: This letter is to inform you that a pre-development conference has been scheduled for February 15, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. in the Butte County Department of Development Services Conference Room. Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to call me at (530)538-7601, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.. Sincerely, Craig Sanders i COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST APPLICATION: J & J Electric Pre-Development Conference PRED00-04 ATE: January 28, 2000 County Offices and Cities: / / Chief Administrative Officer ✓ Develop.Services Director { Public Works Director fX7 V Environmental Health _ Building Manager _ Sheriff _ BCAG _ ALUC 4X ✓ LAFCo _ Air Quality Mgmt. / Butte Co.Farm Bureau Biggs _ Gridley Chico Oroville _ Paradise _ Chico Airport Commission Agricultural Commission Irrigation District: Butte Water _ Biggs/W.Gridley Water _ Durham Irrigation OWID _ Paradise Irrigation _ Richvale Irrigation Table Mountain Irrigation _ Thermalito Irrigation _ Other Domestic Water Butte Water District _ California Water Service Co. _ Del Oro Water Co. OWID _ Thermalito Irrigation District _ Other Sewer Butte Water District _ Themalito Irrigation _ Sterling City Sewer Main Skansen Subdivision(CSA 21) _ L.O.A.PUD Fire Protection California Department of Forestry_ El Medio Fire Protection District Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Durham Area Recreation _ Feather River Rec.&Park Paradise Recreation&Park Richvale Recreation &Parks Utilities Gxa PG&E North-Chico _ Chambers Cable TV _ Pacific Bell _ PG&E South-Oroville _ Viacom Cable TV State Agencies "enCalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept.of Water Resources Dept.of Fish and Game Forestry(Attn:Craig Carter) _ Dept of Parks and Rea Highway Patrol Central Reg.Water Quality Cont._ Caltrans,Aeronautics Program Department of Conservation Off.of Mining Reclamation _ Off.of Governmental&Env.Relations Dept.Social Services,Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management _ US Fish&Wildlife Service Army Corps of Engineers Other Districts,Agencies,Committees,etc. Lime Saddle Dist _ Community Association _ Mosq.Abatement.Oroville/Butte Co Drainage _ Butte Env.l Council _ Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society _ Butte Co.Mining Committee _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. Butte Ck.Watershed Conservancy_ School Districts K:\FORMS\DISTR.LIS ffafte, Count I A N D OF NATURAL 'WEALTH AND BEAUTY J PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE-OROVILLi_.CALI-ORNIA 959653397 ! TELEPHONE:(Sid)538-7601 ! July 25, 1990 Russ Croninger RFC Surveyors 331 Wall Street Chico, CA 95928 Re: Rezone A eement, File 90-18 Dear Mr. r: Enclosed is the Agreement adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting of July 24, 1990, for Ron and Rick iaffins. Please have this Agreement signed and notarized and returned to this office for submittal io the Clerk of the Board for recordation. A recorded copy will be gent to you for your records. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, jr er Director of Planning BAK:lr Enc. Pacific Gas and Electric %-vinpany 460 Rio Lindo Avenue —on Chambers Chico,CA 95926 Chico Land Rights Office 530/894-4423 FAX 530/894-4414 February 9, 2000 FAI Mr. Craig Sanders Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division, Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 RE: 14 Lots, Estate Drive @ Highway 99 Dear Mr. Sanders: We have reviewed the plans regarding the subject project. PG&E has both gas and electric facilities in the area and is capable of serving this project. PG&E requests that the 50 foot roadway easement be dedicated to include utilities, in addition to a 10 foot wide P.U.E. dedication along all lot lines fronting streets or roads. Please contact Mr. Dave Moore at 894-4723 in our gas engineering department, and Mr. Joe Greco of our electric engineering department at 894-4713, if you have specific questions regarding our facilities. Thank you for the opportunity to review this matter. If you have any questions, please call me in Chico at 894-4423. Sincerely, Donald W. Chambers Land Agent (file: Estates.doc) RECEIVED FEB :10 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION f AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this day of 1990, by and between "First Party", as identified in item (a) of Exhibit I of this Agreement, and the COUNTY Of- BUTTE, a political subdivision of the State of California, herein called 'Second Party". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, First Party is the owner of real properly, herein called the "Property", situated in the County of Butte, which Property is described ir. Item (f) of Exhibit I of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Property is now zoned as specified in Item (b) of Exhibit l; and WHEREAS, First Pary has applied for a reclassification of zoning of the Property pursuant to which application the Property is b.nng reclassified from its present classification to the classification or classifications specified in Itei,i (c) of Exhibit I; and WHEREAS. public hearings have been held upon sa d application before the Board of Supervisors of the CoL r;y of Butte, State of California, and after having considered the matter presented, it has been determined that certain conditions to the zoning reclassification of said real property must be imposed so as not to create any problems inimical to the health, safety and the ge..eral welfare of the County of Butte. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that inasmuch as the reclassification specified in Item (c) of Exhibit 1 is being granted, t!le said reclassification shall be subject to the conditions specified in the fallowing paragraphs: I. That Exhibit I,as completed and attached hereto,is incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement with tate same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. 2. That Fest Parry shall construct and comply with all the following conditions: 2a. At the time of a submittal for a tentative map or development proposal, the applicant shall provide a map that identifies all existing trees and r.pariari vegetation in relation to roads and building pad locations. All native vegetation that is not impacted by roads or structures shall be preserved. 2b. Development of the site shall comply with the sewerage disposal requirements of the County Environmental Health Department. Grading of the topsoil shall be minimized, especially at the north end of the project to enhance the sewage cisposal capabilities. 2c. Any proposed roads that cross the Durham Murual Ditch shall be approved by the Department of Fish and Game. 2d. A sound attenuation wall of at least 6 feet in height and a landscape visual buffer of fast-growing trees and shrubs (such as Oleander, Hopbrush, Aleppo Pine, or Poplars) shall be provided along State Highway 99 frontage. The bai rier is to be cesigned such that noise will be t ::iced to 65 dB or less at the property lines of parcels fronting on Highway 99, 2e. Obtain a written approval from Cal Trans relative to Estates Drive access and- ,z,.ntial frontage roads. 2f. A permanent solution for drainage, including the protection of downstream :-,peries from any flooding. This shall be provided at the time of tentative map or development :bmittal. 2g. Incorl.orate 'pollution traps' into the storm drain d•�,igi� near the point of .:.charge to minimize impacts during low flows. 2h. Comply with energy conservation measures as set forth in the Uniform Building de and Section 66473.1 of the Subdivision Map Act. 3. In the event First Party, any successor in interest of First Party, or any F arson possession of the property described in Item (f) of Exhibit I violates or fails to perform any of conditions of this Agreement within thirty (30) days after notice thereof as provided in i ragraph 5, the Board of Supervisors of Second Para may instruct the County Counsel of Second :'::rn :c, institute legal proceedings to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. The board of uper,-isors of Second Party may also initiate proc-aedings to rezone the property to the classification �ecified in Item (b) of Exhibit I or any other :unable classification. 4. Notice of violation of previsions of this Agreement shall be sent to First Party I the address specific in Item �d) of Exhibit I and to the street address of the property described Item (d) of Exhibit 1. Any subsequent title holder, any.lien holder,or party in possession of the roperty shall also receive notice of such violation at an address other than as specified in Item (d) -�f Exhibit I by filing with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Second Party the address to Ahich the notice is to be sent, with reference to this Agreement and the Resolution authorizing its -xecution. 5. In the event suit is brought by the County Counsel of Second Party to enforce iv of the provisions of?.his Agreement,First Party agrees to pay to Second Party a reasonable sum n 10 be fired by the Court as attorney's fees. 6. Each and every one of the provisions of this agreement herein contained shall ,d and insure to the benefit of the successor in interest of each and every party hereto,in the same manner as if they had herein been expressly named. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. Ron Laffins i Rick Laffins COUNTY OF BUTTE, a politicai subdivision of the State of California By Chairperson of the Board of Supervisors "Second Party" .ATTEST: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors MINASIAN, MINAGIAN, MINASIAN, SPRUANCE, SABER, MEITH & SOARES ATTORNEYS AT LAW ..... w"•....,. .r.. r•.•.rnr.ws..o,r.a.uo n,.;.w.r[�ero:..•cowwuw•nonsr ,o,rn uwrr mnow•.re)znor] .. ....w..•,.ncrr,•. rnw erwo s. En c.wr.r n.rw..rec]-ro.• .. ..... r.n ,.,,,,,., w.• e)o wE.•c.nr.rr..rn•sr.n w]]roe. r,r,., • w..r.. .r,.1.1 .•E.♦ri .r•VVe]t6)V ._—_ � . ,. ...r.r5 n•vrr.,,u,n•Sr.v w . 1. .I.r.. er.1. ••[rq n.5]]>e ry., ...,..,,.T r. August 15, 1990 Butte County Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 Re: Butte Creek Estatec-Laffins Condominium Project Ladies & Gentlemen: Please be advised that a certificate of occupancy should not be granted to the Laffins Condominium Project, Lot 23 of Butte Creek Estates, for more than one dwelling unit because water service can only be provided to one unit pursua! t to corporation securities laws until additional shares in Butte Creek Estates Service Corporation are qualified with the Department of Corporations. Although Butte Creek Estates Service Corporation issued a "Will Serve" letter in the past on this project, the parties knew that additional shares entitling the property owner to water service would need to be qualified with the Department of Corporations. At the present time, only one share is qualified for Lot 23, which entitles water service to only one unit owner. Occupancy should not be granted the other three units until three additional shares are qualified to entitle those properties to water service. Very truly yours, MINASIAN, MINASIAN, MINASIAN, SPRUANCE, BABER, MEITH & SOARES BY MICHAEL V hEXTON MVS:aw cc: Alan E. Burchett B""eCo.plmn"cmmL Carl B. Leverenz Richard Laffins AUG Ronald Laffins Juanita Laffins prwille,Win" 8!a Ron Laffins, Rezone, File 90-18. Mitigation Measures: 1. At the time of a submittal for a tentative map or development proposal, the applicant shall Provide a map that identifies all existing trees and riparian vegetation in relation to roads and building pad locations. All native vege. tion that is not impacted by roads or structures shall be preserved. 2. Development of the site shall comply with the sewerage disposal requirements of the County Environmental Health Department. Grading of the topsoil shall be minimized. especially at the north end of the project to enhance the sewage disposal capabilities. 3. Any proposed roads that cross the Durham Mutual Ditch shall be approved by the Department of Fish and Game. 4. A sound attenuation wall of at least 6 feet in height and a landscape visual buffer of fast-growing trees and shrubs (such as Oleander, Hopbrush, Aleppo Pine, or Poplars) shall be provided along State Highway 99 frontage. The barrier is to be designed such that noise will be reduced to 65 d13 or less at the property lines of parcels fronting on Highway 99. 5. Obtain a written approval from Caltrans relative to Estates Drive access and provide an easement for a future frontage road that complies with Caltrans requirements for width and location. 6. Provide for a permanent solution for drainage, including the protection of downstream properties from any flooding. This shall be provided at the time of tentative map or development submittal. 7. Incorporate "pollution traps"into the storm drain design near the point of discharge to minimize impacts during low flows. 8. Comply with energy conservation measures as set forth in the Uniform Building Code and Section 66473.1 of the Subdivision Map Act. �_ -- -- ,--_-_ �_ _ _r, �.,-- ._ _�..� � �,, ,4 r � � � � �.���o� �.Q„�.a� � , ,� � -� FEB. 10 ' 00 (THU) 14:29 CITY OF CHICO COMMUNITY DEV. DEPT 9166954726 PAGE. 1/1 c(rv01cr„co CITY OF CHICO MEMORANDUM Int loll TO: Craig Sanders/Butte County Planning DATE: February 10, 2000 FROM: Jay Hanson/Planning Division FILE: J & J Electric SUBJECT: Pre-development Conference Subdivision Map In response to the request for comments dated 1-31-2000 regarding the above mentioned item, City Staff offer the following observations: 1. Recommend smaller lots clustered on the southeasterly portion of the site. 2. Recommend access be further away from intersection of SHR 99 and Estates Way. As proposed, it intersects too close to SWR 99. Should be at right angles to Estates Way. 3. The proposed lots are substandard to City pre-zone which is RS-20. 4. Wells and septic system in flood zone? 5. Recommend moving sound wall further away from SHR 99 R/W to improve sound attenuation and scenic highway viewshed . 6. Tree preservation? RECEIVED 7. How is drainage design proposed. FEB 10 2000 PUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION Post-ir Fox NOWN7�71oats 2,10 ► 1 To FromColoopCo.Phone 0Phorl S-4 Pba Fax C t LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: PRED 00-04 AP# 040-350-016, 017, & 018/040-020-159 APPLICANT: J & J Electric, 549 Mission Santa Fe Circle, Chico, CA 95926 OWNER: Same REPRESENTATIVE: REQUEST: Pre-Development Conference to review flexible lot design, creating 14 lots SIZE: 14++acres LOCATION: on the south west side of Highway 99 on both sides of Estates Drive SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT #4-EXISTING ZONING: _SR-1 ( Suburban Residential, 1 acre parcel) ZONING HISTORY: SURROUNDING ZONING: R1/U (Residential &Unclassifed) SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LDR(Low Density Residential) APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Date Rec'd 1-26-00 TOTAL PUBLIC ENV. N6E/NOD CO APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM DATE RECEIPT P.-Li SALES HEALTH F?G FEE NO. RECEIVED R LAF PLANNING FIRE OTHER RECEIPT 18158 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE.OF PLANNING ISSUED BY �/�' p� �8�� G� S�, e� �` dJ �—1C�.r� v•oV114) 4M/`JL - DATE RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC LAFCO PLANNING PUBLIC ENV. FIRE NOE/NOD OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM NO. RECEIVED WORKS SALES HEALTH F/G FEE RECEIPT 18158 ' OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING ISSUED BV RON COLEMAN 1037 RICHARD JONES 90-3896/1211 549-MISSION SANTA FE I-If—2&,&c!:,CHICO,CA 95926 DATE a z PAY TO THE ORDER OF flc.WV a Q DOLLARS sooVe a,.ow,.. Soa.m o.oecw. I�INORTH STATE North Chico ice NATIONAL 2385 o SCA 95926 BANK (530)893-1573 FOR N1' is L 2 L'4.3896 W: LO 3 700 200066 L6u' tz zy D z"m z C� 00 Iru.. to U,y c. 0 � PJM CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER 468 MANZANITA AVE., SUITE 5 CHICO, CA 95926 (916) 893-0631 FAX (916) 893-1000 February 26, 1998 Department of Development Services County of Butte 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Attention: Tom Parilo Re: Merger of Lands, Valley Oaks Subdivision Dear Mr. Pardo, On January 15, 1998, Mr. Ron Laffins,Mr. Rick Laffins and myself met with you and members.of your.staff regarding..possible.options for the subject land_presently encumbefed:witb.an:app'royed"tentative subdivision map. Staff members present were Mr. Stuart.Edell and Mr:Craig,Sanders. The Laffins' have asked me.to contact you regarding the results of that'3meeting and to reaffirm their understanding of those results. According to my notes, the following items were discussed` a) If the tentative map approval is abandoned, the original boundary lines can be adjusted through the merger process. Conditions of approval relating to the subdivision will not be in force. b) Newly design parcels north of Estates Drive.can be served by a private (60 foot) roadway easement. c). The highway 99 frontage road would not be required for development of parcels north of Estates Drive. d) The highway 99.frontage road would not be required for development of the single parcel south of Estates Drive,.but an access easement will be reserved. . e) A fire protection system (well, hydrants, etc.)wil 'not be required for :development of,the four parcels., J) Land'scapirig..alongahe.freeway right of way will.be required. . : . g) No parcel, after merger adjustment;will be-less"than one'acre in riet"area. ftinnfin—, gT i�s�a MARS 0 219 Oroville,Callfbmj& If this is your understanding of the results of that meeting, please confirm this in writing at your earliest co venience. Sincerely, E. RISSO cc: Rick Laffins a l— BU T TE CREEK ES.TA TES, UN/T NO. / Ole� loe N� FP -fie 56 ' / 'Sad 100, /06 4 I. / 351 6 IOIAe 5� � .79Ao 6� { `G / B 1,F 36 GO. 129.6 , 107 s I40 70 — Oft. i 2 G0o� a L27Ac ri 5 :•r 8T.21 6B O ' �.� 301� `� �♦ O . . SEE 040-02-0424-0 pd I PM 70-74 v '•� 't'� • 64 02 't 67 a a 65 66 _ `.9J i3s.os p /0 iso• ' � 9u rre CREEK £S Ta T£S Surv, um r No./. 34 Ma R. 34,35,36,.Y? 3•i8-66. ' �.ol Assessor's l{lQ 40-35 s county of Butte, CO/%f. CROUCH 011CH . — 1 e.0 `ofs,o� 112.115AC R0 ® I 1 2 FYM49-24 hIONEYRUN -� K —� ee v Z A561!—38 I 1 —39 , 1 c3 / /2G 12.30A* �. etrtw 21.55A� � 2• l41 17.29* J0.47Ac. 1 48.29 AC I 11 —41 /3L04 AC PM 88-28 PrW 2 5/ryWAy 142 6 S7 AC. t1 =`1 56.69Ac :. 16.09AC 140 39 Wo 04 y a O40c c ,ae of 00 Z �n '38.06AC 9Mn lb GIs 9 m OAC fob . 164 � Q18.09 A 208.37AC 0 16to 1.45 N a C.) �` ... N w 1 Q - Pt 3 Z 1 MARY BI LL 3615.07. RANCH. ROAD_ — =110 AC= -N— 071.73— — .,347.61 — 2 5 Pen. ,�� 1 I FRAC'f ONAI 39—Oi6 22� 146J .. 1 ® 23.02 .5 Ac. v Ac. -* 39 �+ ® i t• 1�s ►- 9 N v 3/.BAC 36.39 Ac e 3 1 1 '\i . I 9'1C% _ I y • - o ® 144 j t 982.95 20.58 N 2 3 I a we. 33.34 AC 49 I Flo i � A 20.8 M C. 6 G ® 5AC 151 `moi Ac, PM X 7-14 cTrE• I 'y to 20.01 Ac. 996.20 431 r '4- c0 Jw �a2 �.= D 1/8/.7 - IT c� 7� PT !PCI l� l4 0'' \ �3 s4Er \► r 4605AC•a� '. WEST BANK°•1983 12 2713' ,.� RS 110-71 01*11 2e9M4AMI _ cn M• PM 94.7 PG 46� Assessor s Map 'No• 40OG NOTE: These parcels are b / arcels• rosselsn►en1 pees O5 County of Butte, Calif. O6 LEC only and may not constItute levo/ parcels. ti�yy REVISED: I-W. _-. _.. --rim-._ .-• . ..