Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PRED 04-10_PLANNING
tlI�� IIVVII � INI � � �� � IV I I SEPARATOR SHEET APN /fid�i — `I 00 PROJECT NUMBER PIED �`i �10 PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE NO.: PRED 04-10 PROJECT TYPE: Predevelopment Conference APN: 006-400-025,026,027,028,029 APPLICANT: PACLAND ADDRESS: 2901 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 295,Roseville, CA 95661 PHONE: (916) 771-9503 OWNER: Jeff Farrar,Main&Main Investment ADDRESS: 2550 Lakewest Drive, Suite 50, Chico, CA 95928 REPRESENTATIVE: ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pre-development conference for a Use Permit to allow a 208,000 square foot retail store LOCATED: on the northeast corner of Esplanade and Garner Lane, Chico PROPERTY ZONED: C-2 (General Commercial) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: C (Commercial) TOWN/AREA: Chico 1. Application accepted: 11/7/2003 Amount: $243.00 Receipt#: 391315 2. Assigned To: Stephen Betts 3. Comments sent to:.Development Services Director,Public Works Director, Environmental Health, Assessor, LAFCo,Ag. Commissioner, California Department of Forestry,Building Manager, County Counsel,Air Quality Management,ALUC, City of Chico, CalTrans,RWQCB,DFG,Mary Anne Houx 4. Sent to Inter-Departmental Review Committee (IDR): 5. Date scheduled for IDR: N/A 6. Comments received from: 7. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 8. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 9. Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No: Categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration , Subject to Fish&Game: Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. —CEQA# 15 06 1. (bx3) Other 10. Staff Report: Project Video: 11. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: 12. Publication Notice Written: Display Ad Prepared: 13. Notices Mailed: Number of Notices: 14. Newspaper Publication Date: O C P . G B 15. Planning Commission Hearing(s): Action taken: Special Conditions: Commission Resolution No.: 16. Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: 17. Type Predevelopment Conference/Send for signature: / 0 18. N.O.E./N.O.D./APPENDIX G: Fish&Game Fees Paid: Yes No 19. Send validated Predevelopment Conference: 20. Assessor's Memo: 21. Copy of Predevelopment Conference to Planning Technician: DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on page 2 APPLICANT'S NAME: (If application is different from owner an affidavit is required.) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: PACLAND (Agent Authorization under s earate cover) Please see below- ADDRESS: STREET,CITY,STATE,&ZIP CODE FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) 2901 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 295• Roseville CA 95661 /�PD 6y-/0 NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT(If any) TELEPHONE: Proposed Retail 91771-9503 LOCATION OF PROJECT(Major cross streets and Address,if any) Hwy 99 and Garner Lane; Chico, California .<::.. .: ... .:__.. .. ........ .. . .. _..:. ..... .. ... .... .. ENERAL INE RMA'1'I N RE. •D`'- <'., ,..... .......... ... :., : . . O DIRE �r OWNER'S NAME: TELEPHONE: Jeff Farrar, Main & Main Investment ((530)899-9200 ADDRESS: CITY,STATE,&ZIP CODE: 2550 Lakewest Drive Suite 50 Chico CA 95928 ZONE GENERAL PLANEXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE(in Square Feet or Acres) C-2 General Comm rcial Golf Course 20 acres EXISTING STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) approximately 5,000 sq. ft. approximately 208 000 sq. ft. (Check One) (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER El - C GENERAL PLAN AME N� O 1111 ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ REZONE D �J ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ USE PERMIT E] WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT NOV + 7 W ElBOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ElVARIANCE ElLEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ElMINOR VARIANCE ElCERTIFICATE OF MERGER BUTTE COUNTY ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PE IT PLANNING DIVISION ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN -1DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT X OTHER Pre-Development Con& ence PROJEC DE_ :•.YtI FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT(Attach necessary sheets. If this appl"cation is for a land division,describe the number and size of parcels.) Parcel 1006-400-025 6 acres Commercial Retail Development of approximately Parcel 2 006-400-026 5 acres 208,000 square feet with general merchandise, Parcel 3 006-400-027 3.03 acres pharmacy, grocery, minor auto service, and garden Parcel 4 006-400-028 3.4 acres supplies. Parcel 5 006-400-029 2.04 acres . ..:. .. ._,... ..... ..O ERTIFY ATI. N...... .,.:::...:... .. I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER,I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized;execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.) DATE: SIGNATURE: K:\FORMS\UNIFORM APPLICATION Page 1 of2 {;r'14 cC !'; A November 7, 2003 Mr.Joseph Baker Planning Manager BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 RE: Proposed Retail Project NWC Hwy 99 and Garner Lane Chico, California Dear Mr. Baker: This letter shall authorize Main & Main Investments, LLC or PACLAND Engineering to act on our behalf in processing the required land use application(s) in connection with; the proposed retail project located at 13301 Garner Lane commonly known as Sunset Hills Golf Course. Sincerely, Sunset Hills Golf Course, Inc. David Van Dyke, Pres• ent o•\moin A,moin\InMnrc\inff�l+�4ar 11/1R(14♦Inr COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROV ILLE, CA ATR NO 60030 RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BRAG 330 DATE 11112J2003 FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: 1140 RECEIPTS: 351311,391314-315 'PLANNING APPL FEES GENL 0010 440W 42iO9W 101001 118.00 Project Number Amount-of Fee #065-010-008 L Vandegrift FRED 04-09 $59 #108.400-025-029 Pacland PRED 04-10 $59 LAND DEVELOPMENT GENL 0010 44004 4611700 101001 150.00 Project Plumber Amount of Fee #085.010-008 L Vandegrift PRED 04-09 $75 #006400-025-029 Pacland PRED 0440 $75 ENVIRONMENTAL HLTH GENL 0010 5400M 4614901 1010.01 132.00 Project Plumber Amount of Fee #085.0i0-008 LVandegi; PRED 04-09 $BE #008401}-025-029 Pacland PRED 04-10 $BE FIRE PLNG ADPL FEE FIRE PROTECT 0100 4617240 101001 ' 86.00 Project Bomber Amount of Fee #085-010-008 L Vandegr PRED 04-09 $43 #006-400-025-029 Pacland PRED 0410 $43 AUNT MINNIE DEPOSITS PLAN-PERF TR 1009 21O 10113D5 2,0aW.00 (1600 ) Pmject Number - Amount of B=ee #007-210-025 Sherwood ADM 0413 $2,0000. TOTAL $ 2,4$6.00 APPR RECEDED BY: AG TOR-C LLER t TREASURER B .y: white=treasurer pink—auditor cana€v=deodsitor Holden r€ad=Fise z. l t - Monday,-November,o;2003; �, Deuelop,ment Services ' - ' ,, '' P1�4`NN'fNG�D11/IStOIV V;er. �.o , s� Cpe Fr (Genera F'nd $243.00 —, t_ , f ) • _.—. --------------�..._ Payment;Date I ' 11/7/2003 Pu lic Works $0.00 - b r , • R ce eiptNumber (391315 Env`roninental� -_.__ _ « 00 i , , i' =Health $0 , ReceivedFrom 'Pacific Land Design PC.17 - - - - CDF(Fire Depaf) $0'.00 w ......_............._................._ ..... .........__._.... --....._............................_.... _......._ _..... -. - - ,�' �' - , Applicant, PACLAND` NOE` $0.00 NOD'S/.�- � (RecorcJmg Fee) Aunt Minn e -:'✓K',"-Y,.X�' '+N'.'�`H'rti+,5e .—.......__..._......._ _.. ........... _ • •� Application Number IPRED 04-10 $1,SOO:oMM I r$2,000 or In Reference To ; -........--......_..._... - - n $0.00 ParcelNumber11006-400-025, — -- -- ' 026 .......................................... ::::................._... Fisfi/Game 28 029 ._ I .... ........ K1!6057 - v • . ,. Check Number/'Cash , 057 - � - . ---------- —-- ...............................— $0.00 Our Totah Received 2x ,. ............................................ ................ $ 43p _ _............._............_..... - �FundsWj' n Sent -- -y-- - Total E s �� u�$25 00 Fee)-1 �" � ---------- Cell To,.wer $0.00 ' s - .........._: _ Public' Sales/Co yes $0.00 __...-.......__........._........._......_._................_. « Other: $0.00,I - - .'- .. —• �.�� .� -- S" � � � , is� .,f �,c _ .�-y_ s�• fay �-. • �l,I �. ., s. • .- - \" - .� - '� . a.. 4••-' , L _� •� _ COUNTY OF BUTTE 391315 OFFICIAL RECEIPT it OFFICE OR DEPA"IVIENT ISSUING RECEIPT ZO�i Received from a -Ile Sum of 0_ 1 ;iy 1iiti�rt/��A9,171- 10, For Received: 006 - qOc)- COQ—Da Received Bym " eg.�.'2 CASH ❑ Title CHECK � By DAVCO BUSINESS FORMS•(530)7436511 Form 75702 _. . PACIFIC LAND DESIGN.PC ` OLYMPIA OFFICE ACCOUNT 6057 606 COLUMBIA ST.NW,STE.106 ' OLYMPIA,WA 98501 1947/1250 360-786-9500 966 DATE 6 '. PAYTO.THE 'V " ' cod4rll m0` ORDER OF ` �o a DOLLARS 8 KeyBank National Association Cleveland,Ohio 44114 1S o-KEY2vou" NP I FOR C�'p�� o vet¢ w rL.CPi 11'0060 5 Til' 1: L 2 5000 5 74ii: L. 7908 LO 208"1911' Page 1 of 3 Betts, Steve From: Shell MacPherson [smacpherson@pacland.com] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:08 AM To: Betts, Steve Cc: Shell MacPherson Subject: RE: Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Steve- Our group is available on the 12th from 10am-12pm. Let me know at your earliest convenience when you confirm the time and location. Thanks, Shell MacPherson PACLAND 2901 Douglas Blvd.,Suite 295 Roseville,CA 95661 Office:(916)771-9503 Fax:(916)771-3545 From: Shell MacPherson Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:47 AM To: 'Betts, Steve' Subject: RE: Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting I will start checking with the team for tentative meeting on Friday 12/12 10-12 am. thanks Shell MacPherson PACLAND 2901 Douglas Blvd.,Suite 295 Roseville,CA 95661 Office:(916)771-9503 Fax:(916)771-3545 From: Betts, Steve [mailto:SBetts@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:39 AM To: Shell MacPherson Subject: RE: Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting The second week in December is possible but Thursday (Dec. 11) is not available since we have a Planning Commission meeting most of that day. We most likely would not get comments from State agencies due to the short time period (most of the time State agencies don't comment or show up for the meeting anyway). Friday (Dec. 12)would be the best day, with morning (10-12) probably being the best time. I will have to find an open conference room, though. If that date/time works for you please let me know so I can make the necessary arrangements. 11/20/2003 Page 2 of 3 Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk- (530)538-7153 Fax —(530)538-7785 -----Original Message----- From: Shell MacPherson [mailto:smacpherson@pacland.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:23 AM To: Betts, Steve Subject: RE:Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Steve, we will likely have 4 people attending. Is there a possibility of meeting the second week of December? Thank you Shell MacPherson PACLAND 2901 Douglas Blvd.,Suite 295 Roseville,CA 95661 Office:(916)771-9503 Fax:(916)771-3545 From: Betts, Steve [mailto:SBetts@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:18 AM To: Shell MacPherson Subject: PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Mr. MacPherson, Sorry I missed your return call to me yesterday. I am trying to set up the pre-development meeting and want to make sure that you, or someone from your company, can attend. This is normally an easy process, but unfortunately our offices are currently being renovated and our conference room is unavailable- I now have to contact other departments to find an available conference room, and doing that makes it harder to set up the meeting. The week of Dec. 15-19 would allow sufficient time for County departments and State agencies to respond and/or schedule time for the meeting. Please provide me with an estimate of how many people from your company you believe will attend the meeting—the number of people attending will determine which conference room I need to reserve. Thank you. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk- (530)538-7153 Fax —(530)538-7785 11/20/2003 Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Fogel, Doug Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 12:09 PM To: Betts, Steve; Bottenfield, Cliff; Crawford, Ted; Edell, Stuart; Kuykendall, Tom; Hill, Rob Cc: Severin, Vance Subject: RE: PACLAND Pre-Development Conference, Friday, December 12 Cliff and I have time conflicts. We already have a prescheduled meeting_ -----Original Message----- From: Betts, Steve Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:54 AM To: Bottenfield, Cliff; Fogel, Doug; Crawford,Ted; Edell, Stuart; Kuykendall,Tom; Hill, Rob Subject: PACLAND Pre-Development Conference, Friday, December 12 Just a reminder that there is a pre-development conference for PACLAND scheduled for this Friday, December 12th, at 10:00. The meeting will be held in the 3-A conference room (the building behind the Planning Division). Please ensure that you or your representative can attend the meeting. If not, please provide me with your comments/conditions of project approval prior to Friday. Thanks. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk- (530)538-7153 Fax —(530)538-7785 12/8/2003 vqz-s PIE H H QSb-I LL c,91A4� 40 X3.10 r vf�rYwoff oplIfF y ��a s �s�u�s ueu.�wi SLS � /La-) SsN�S 1N Yl° �.o,. ooZ S=b� s.��1s3nNf n�ltic + Nt�h� —v�2� �3r 9 9d G S� f no-) ra w� •4 �a�^sc�;� BLL-g S-9 (-.L ?r-1 r t ' F "`S�1C ua• 1-'-.:t ,�,kw`•j`v.i{""—'• H.y{{.�`f •:'� S' _t3'1 • 1:{ i ,•�` �'. . 4,..ri•�Y;is .�4;,,��z2 •�t.� i.. � . �� �.l 1 'moi ,. 'i ' r fit• ."ya •�= ; L•± i ' , I f i ,r f 1 I i 1 11� lit ik 4i !A l SQfV t �;21N a Yf Vrd -V I ZC d �i 1,1 �,uwuCIO��naQ-aJ QN V' 31d(�. tIl z, \ | - || � ] � . � | | ||| � � ||| ` . . _ . . .� � � � ` || \ � j| . � . . • ||| � � . . � �| � ||| . | � � �| \ � . . I | . � � � > � � � � | . �i�. � , . \ ` \� - . - �� . . , . � / \ \ � \ , . 's � � �#�!2�xa" ��,� + -2 a& ��m�� t&��%& Z�d�� - /%2 �.» ��' :;����w�/ | �S� zm { � . <) §. � Kms, � � J� /:»2 I . �! . . . |��� � ~ � �� � ��' ` `� � ` � � � � \�{{GRA x(66 ����. � . , . � i �� , i . " �! . � _ / !� � ^~�� ����� «� � �� 2y� { y �3�.��� �� . ��. � «�w®»= �! \) �. vw e �,� . as{ �b o2� iii 004 ...�' Ina G4 TIP-�) vozry �- -V�a�� b', >01 S s�� � � �..eMai`,J� Ss��b S Sa��n •�a}; �.,��0 n I J bGi V b ulJl�t laDJ�jitNAI'� �V)la��' I-b)' �\.n .-4-`1 GI�j — S Ia.3j w Q o-a — bWCV 1 o CJO to . r'� it =a► Vi a.�F t f� '4 �r i! �F{ !•J F A or 0-,) lvp NA M. �li ZS yew►`S0 / Sults*-a- o_� -.et ,M) -,o w+o%cpo-, F l :a 71, VMS f F _ 7 CA 1 .F 1 I ' Jas s s , r s� PumQj�'..�ap\.Arn �- Ili'lt ,�n S-� pr-a-wv*CPD�.J .rt � � o� !F a .�-��,►,,,� _ 1�ti� F:� ,f :r f`�� -----------if- 44 4J yBu__'o r M .... L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 18-B County Center Drive 411 Main Street 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 P.O.Box 5364 © Oroville,CA 95965 TEL:(916)538-7282 Chico,CA 95927 TEL:(916) 538-7281 December 17, 2003 FAX:(9 16)538-2165 TEL:(916)891-2727 FAX(916) 538-2140 FAX:(916)895-6512 Pacland 2901 Douglas Blvd. Suite 295 Roseville, CA 95661 Re: Pre-development conference for five.parcels at Garner Ln. and Esplanade in Chico, APN 006=400-025 through 029 This is a summary of the information we provided to you at the above meeting held on December 12, 2003. The recommended form of sewage disposal, in accordance with the City of Chico's Area of Joint Cooperation Plan, is community sewer. Should an on-site sewage disposal system be necessary it will require the approval of RWQCB. The water system shall be an approved community system such as Cal Water. • The fueling station will require permits for underground fuel storage tanks. • The retail food service and the grocery store will require permits form our office. • Solid waste disposal will require approval from our office. • The siting of the storm drainage system will need approval from our office. • A hazardous materials business plan will be required. We have a septic application dated October 17, 2003 from Jeff Farrarin our file. Ground water monitoring was begun on the site under this application. If you desire we will roll the fee received for this application over into a pre-application for the parcel map you mentioned intending to do as part of this project. A pre-application is normally required to be completed prior to submission of an application for a parcel map with the Department of Development Services. If you have any questions please contact me at the above noted office. fog F 1, DEC 18 2003 Program Manager CC: planning V/ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION A CLEAN INDOOR AIR ENVIRONMENT FOR A HEALTHIER TOMORROW ;� BUTTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTY DEPARTMENT PLANNING DEC,. �6 2003 411 Main Street ®EVELOPNIENT CITYoFCHICO P.O. Box 3420 SERVICES INC.1872 Chico. CA 95927 (530) 895-4851 Fax (530) 895-4726 http://www.ci.chico.ca.us December 11, 2003 Stephen Betts, Senior Planner Development Services Department Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA. 95965-3397 Subject: APN: 006-400-025 through 029, Pre-Development Review for PACLAND Dear Stephen: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposed commercial redevelopment of 20 acres. with a 208,300 square foot retail building and parking facilities for 1,039 vehicles, located north of the intersection of Garner Lane and the Esplanade. The City Planning Division forwards the following comments: 1) The City recommends that the County deny the use permit because the proposed development is located on property that is unserved by sanitary sewer. The use of on- site wastewater treatment for a retail facility of this scale and intensity does not appear appropriate. 2) Connection to sanitary sewer, which would need to be extended from its location at Eaton and the Esplanade, requires annexation to the City of Chico. It is not known whether the project site can be served by gravity flow,the unknown being the crossing of Mud/Sycamore Creek. 3) Should the County conduct environmental review (which is not required for projects that are denied),the City recommends that an environmental impact report be prepared that addresses aesthetics, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, population,and housing,public services,transportation/traffic,and utilities and service systems (as well as any additional impacts that may be identified). Cumulative and growth-inducing impacts should be addressed, and the required analysis of project alternatives should include discussion of potential alternative sites that may be environmentally superior. 4) As noted above, and with comments sent recently for the Guernsey and Hauslet subdivision proposals, traffic analysis should be required to assess impacts to area g�� Made From Recycled Paper roadways, particularly SHR 99 at Garner Lane and Eaton Road. At a minimum, improvements should be consistent with the "Garner Lane - Mid to Long Term Alternative"plan(copy attached)from the Chico Corridor Study prepared for the Butte County Association of Governments in January, 2001, and the improvements mentioned in 5, 6 and 7. 5) Garner Lane should be improved with full urban improvements to the 2-lane collector standard. 6) Esplanade/Garner Lane Realignment: the realignment as shown could be considered. 7) Esplanade: Full urban improvements should be required consistent with the results of the current planning effort for the Northwest Chico Planning Area Specific Plan. 8) Provide a circulation and parking analysis should be provided. 9) Storm drainage will need to be conveyed to Mud/Sycamore Creek. The lines will need to be sized for the entire tributary area identified as 776-44 (copy attached). Preliminary sizes show a 60 inch outfall. The project developer will be responsible for storm drain and sewer improvements on Garner Lane as well as in the Esplanade. 10) The fire flow requirements for a building of 208,300 square feet and protected by automatic fire sprinklers would 6,000 gallons per minute. This would require a minimum of 4 public fire hydrants. 11) The minimum turning radii of 28 feet inside and 48 feet outside should be provided for on-site circulation. 12) Access roads less than 36 feet require Fire Lane No Parking identification on one side and roads less than 28 feet require Fire Lane No Parkin identification on both sides. Parking i 13) A delivery area or zone should be in a suitable location to provide parking for delivery vehicles that do not use the loading dock/s such as UPS, photo deliveries, pharmaceuticals, etc. Again, the city staff appreciate the chance to comment on this proposal and I am available at 895- 4853, if you have further questions about this response. Sincerely, OTo_I'* �ayes Senior Planner CC: A-BC-7 w/referral info < ' B.C.A.G. LIBRARY COPY PSSOCIAUONO�GO DRAFT CA Chico G � Corridor Study O 'ISSOCIAT10'14 O1 In Butte County on State Route 99 from Estates Drive (PM 28.3) ' 1 to Esplanade (PM T38.2) January, 2001 L=1QUINCY 4ENGINEERING, INC. oil IN1I11NIIMoommu.100 � � �11�111111�111111l. _MEMO I���. ::: x�r• � 11111�111111� MEMO, ��� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIG iS7lte SEv���'r��far��.x4• �lrY;u�� i�KrT+�, ")Ttj�L�M�W�+i-",1i.•.��A�'�h h' �j.�.x�+-i��El.■���� E• � ;—. t, 1 . ,' ,t '` .. yyl"r `1" bbrI� ,'4 ". ` 4' 'Yk�'`r s 1 �N-a�` `(�'��+f a 1 F 11 p': yr ' '�' A fi* :_L L'' ..a ,r a y: '+ "�' 1 CitiS .'r ro- t 1 t r x^' . A ., ;L t f h. `tea O �', 1 ' 11, I f - - ,I I.. . .d,�1 r ..1�'i 1,k Cry ,$ `� 'll N _ 11 I01 1p r" f1. .,�, o + t, t t„:r 511 1 r .r ,As t dla ny .. L ), kz�j,�, ,V ��(, y,• y, 4 yV .f, L. .""arr rc M+.'J �, , .- 1.� .,.4e 1.I'll I ;, r a c! , � •clq .' r1. y _ Lv Ix, yt0y .. 1' r 1 V: 11 . n° ', 1. 3' 1'• 6. 4- ,M# ".. rt.F11. ,y ',:i Y ' VFI , fr .tL. " •1 � O '1i' � it 1. � — .ro� ., -, - . ,ik F D ? It a -n m'C 'D,r 'til. i '` sf � :7 �'t+ 11 . l r f y 'I . 'r °,fit; 83"'.ti ' L''" •,'t+. f' '� ,3 q• :•t+ r• �', t"' iT' fa '., Pr.,. .� �': I h yam' f - F I ,r S t `,�'S �I I.1 _fir- 1 -L "s a'1.,• 1J * S Y } yyv sK- ,w; I. ee? 2 t q t < . qty: r - �I .kf 'lGp .h t Y'`d1>'l 4 � j-, _ - t [r'f ' ]. �}�y +,'r ,�i1. r �I - a ;: :: Q r s 1 L .. .- f I;S 1A,' F,t ,'h,�a °4, j`(%r :t'.. t > a 1., f fi :t - A t: .:1' 1/s tlfi_'r'A �11 I. , r 1 . s O J w4�y5<d •rtr r y« r �,h (1 .y . - :� 1 y`. A rtl :O �� 3't ��, i 'PIu ,,,a -:r,! r'1 -t•. ,y +. - _ y^S 'Sy� 4 f_ - , } P•i.MS-f t ;, + y`:.rt Y t f 1f'. `' 1 1 '-'• '/ t-y :( '•`)n yy�� 44}} .1, r' t ,, i �N.�+F� f If S5{l ,� a ;:I( V. /�J�Il:h -` '� r�'' I y''{, YI': /ry"y"•� +T Z•t,• 1 y"1-o'Ij , ,,- '/- .+•, a 1yy .,1. 7 1 ,'d;N r IVrFY'SA r1 A A �, •SGK�; A. �t7 F h 4 L b Y11 —, wr3 4.' '-%1 i _ 'fir 1:,1, _ r•� `3� V. aur .. ��. � , W. ro9,-b : C1- ';K al )'tialµ• A. •� 1 l , l �� i , i s KL.rtikcr f s 1.,;t5 J, : , f..r,. 1, {"'' t,',I,�V. e .':i r 9 �''�l' yt.. ,,. ,'ter c a. 1 4 -t - ya.�+ C r.,.4 i� •R'av 1 ;r Y.. , ,r �, G,, ?: r,c h� ^Yk, a w - - - '"` l,7 P `^M tf Yr 43*at4�Pa tto S. 11 `1 °�'�4 �t4i .t +/�'<z w,- �p¢- t AI 1 a••4 . `,fir ff�;R s s 'c F.1:. m yrs vl�, �3 Y'' �.� '� 't ��; r _ '. ,'- L +%.., 'P: a.,. ,r '�"Ill", rs� '1 i s a1` .�k,: _ .. v '4 ,y.+j. y v,' :1.+; s, :.. . , i P - i. ar t mr. •1 rt + +� 1 i r:'a �. +v x stat' "4 , "t r + '!, -— 'r t;: -{.", S_"If. r 1 C 9" iu . g 1 fes. t;, 4 . ' r4 n�V I 11 t t 'fir .� "-' r �. . ,, ,�:a,1% �1-v m". - . -f� .. I � . T a, ter' t o 7 Y �I.� .`'ar ��� (, . � (; �l.. 1 �Pr y , .'' -. , .T^' y.fa <�'. , A. '1 �' n (� �;rf' + •'� ✓r� ',r lC, t1, *. :.} 1 •"c.'3 "''t', t l .v` .s 5,. "- _ _e;1 J. i �, •h., iF,'"� 4r fi[ ;9* rri.,u:�'C k,-y�. ftp .,+i.c, , t it; a� ham. :i` :} :{S 'r st f _�=„'M.3 '�,S.;e:�i_' .a-W-TI'•.•"+u,�f4"."JJ' k h` Z ;x"_,d.,.. ' LS fit, r •.r, , , `r� '>: .,- r ',� 'T`' ,c'.�:' r r.1 + 1�..3 ,r. u '4 ,a - r 1,`y y.�, '.,ft 1. 2` r + .A.`a, `1,1-41,.. •°b, ,f, 4, s, AIW y t k S _ s :,, ,; s,, :.' •- !' "S. •a _ax±•�?! "I„s Ai v r. -1 f t t 7•s"t. �1�.�G.Y'„ .'t Y• �� (r. _ G• v, y yt �.i'' - '�'`'°fi 1"{.�':rnt 't' ^: fl�e,'�,, r {+f 1 i�i,.R^{��v','I !+ .'�"Gf''t t ly; 1�,: .n: 5.r-i•` 9"p�,'' 7-'}K"'i'°,"r+,Y( .fit `.E'. 'y4; tlfi i 1l.%Lr ,`, �1 ' . ,f.. -.; t•T 1't ', .. ' .r'J � ! '...IP I _�I�r,•. !K i �1,. Z'..hn.!.I t�' 1 is 1 �t s1 21 1 y i t[ k� k 3 t . { .i.• #+ k lr ria ` r; 4 - 1;.7)S r .Int �" '1.�' y a rr ”" a �k ''k t ''*•�..�`R,Yv. w ,.�, 1 1; 'w ti a i Pt;. . 1 I . 11 J�1 y f 111 ,t - 1. - - ,lea.- CC'¢ 1 ,'•y-- }'; PSE" 1'l A J., � A . ; k_ 1 S ''i >Ky {t,?'��,,,�u a iT'afi 7' g�,,)�'N ;at. }r,x 1 ",1 1. ,J .d.., y ''fir-r a � �? r ',y. (� 1 I 1 tt ` *i� �'* r A. - I j . , 1. ,. : ' .. +1 P. , — t° t4 t4,� I. t}•1' A7:,t Ls, ^�.'�"`, t 1'��L • 7 '. .. �, 1 }, 1 1 -, . . - . . I 0 I I . '7-� , � .1A " e 7"i �' :.''I,,.'•'-'1;Ae .w�v'.'.L •fr{•i"' 1 ;� :. t: ht' y I I . , . .. --. �.!� � . , , , ., f, : ,,- . I . . �. I�It,,..-",: . I I. . - , , I : - , '.t - I -, �,,I: . ,,jj ) I, �e; ... ..'' I��!I?�,".*. t .1�1 .*, + i + 1. ,F ) 1 - s .11. r 1r ,� r -. " I. I 1 - �':f i . . ,i ' l: 111 " 1 ' ,, a .. ' .. . ' �, �' F. .. • �. .a 's.r ................................................ . ......... .................. ..................................................................... ................................................................................... .................................................................................... .................................... ................................................................. ............ .......................................... ........................................................... ................................................................................. ... .................................... ..................................................................... SITE DATA ACQUISITION PARCEL I 6.00 AC PARCEL 2 = 5.00 AC PARCEL 3 J.03 AC PARCEL 4 3.40 AC PARCEL 5 = 2.04 AC GARNER LANE R/W TOTAL OA11C USE RETAIL PARCEL IIL%Ac NEW GARNER LAKE R/W 0.38 AC C E OUTLOT 1 1.08 AC TOTAL 20.02 AC EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL BUILDING DATA 410H�A'Y'gg PROPOSED RETAIL 2011,300 SF 7 M03 NOV PARKING DATA PROPOSED PARKING STANDARD =Bw STALLS BUTTE COUNTY ACCESSIBLE - 20 STALLS PLANNING DIVISION COMPACT - 136 STALLS RETAIL TOTAL =1039 STALLS GRAPHIC SCALE PROPOSED PARKING RATIO -5.0 PER 1.000 SF a "o— NOTES: 50 1. DRAWN WITHOUT BENEFIT OF SURVEY .......... .. . . ....................................................................... . . ........ .. ..................................... ................ LEGEND FOR w .................. .......... ........... FENCED AREA .. ......... 1.!.11 il PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS ......... ......... L ............. PROPOSED BUILDING ........... 6 BAY U PROPOSED 18'CURB ............ I. AND CUTTER PROPOSED PARKING SPACES S� GARNER LANE IMPROVEMENT3 114CLUDE ......... E VE IMAVY DUTY AC14MITIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT ........... CURB.GUTTER AND ....... . ............ T SIDE;RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITY POLES TO BEHIND THE NEW SIDEWALK;STORMINATER MANAGEMENT AND C C C PARCEL 1 6.00 ACRES I Icl HEAVY OU • CONCRETE PAVEMENT C C C • ILLUMINATION. STANDARD DUTY ASPHAL71C CONCRETE PAVEMENT C C C C C C qG TRUCK,., 'TURN-ARdUND7 PROPOSED RIGHT IN/RIGHT OUT ACCESS C C c I I I J-Al I C C 1 . 1IFFFrr M I PROPOSED RETAIL Z 1,Tc C A f is 7eAR 1-3 --310- A s RE GROSS SF'=208= ....... ........ C C c C LlijC�-Luinlj-c�j ..................... C C C C Trrri-1-1 C . ................ 150 ASSOCIATE PARKING SPA . .............. BEHIND BUILDING C C C /I I Icl I I I lcl I I I lCl I I I lel I I I Icl I I I lcl I ir--\ �c C I C C f44C fl*C %C N"*C *C R6 R C C ....... ......... PARCEL 4 --- 3.40 ACM--S /7- 41 ........... ................. • ................. .......... C C C C p C C C C C C C IB 4 ............ PARCEL 2 5,00 ACRES C c C C C C C C ............... ............ VACATED R/N C C C C C C C C .............. 2 10'X 45-BALE It- R C �W AACRE,' PALLET ENCLOWES C C H: C C C C A ----- -- - ----- ------------------------------------------------ - -------------/---------------- ................. ............... I iiiLiAl im C llj—CUILI�—Ll- ........... SEPTIC SYSTEM -11 I-Tcl T ffcT C OUTLOT s I flt FCC I STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA LOB ACRES 11 0.5 ACRES -------------------- ------------- --------------------- ----------- L-------------------------- ---------------- ---- 1611.0 J PROPOSED RIGHT W/RIGHI CUT RELOCATE EX. ESPLANADE 10'WOE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY ACCESS WITHDECEL LANE. GARNER LANE&RIW -—-—-—I—-—-—- -—-—- - -—-—-—- .............. R1W ESPLANADE UIROVEMENTS INCLUDE AN APPROXIMATE 14- WIDENING;NEW CURB,GUTTER AND SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE. 889 STALLS IN FRONT AND ON AGRICULTURAL ZONING SETBACK RE NO CUSTOMER DOORS AGRICULTURAL ZONING ON SOUTH SIDE Or SIDEWALK:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND ILLUMINATION. 4.3 PARKING RATIO, RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITY POLES TO BEHIND THE NEW NORTH SIDE OF STORE PROVIDE A OR ROOFTOP HVAC EQUIPMENT IW NO SPRAY EASEMENT---- 'ESPLANADE.20V SETBACK REQUIRED FROM WITHIN 300'OF AGRICULTURAL E5 AGRICULTURAL ZONING FOR CORMERCk USES. (PER DEVELOPER COORDINATION ZONED AREA. (INCLUDING IDO'NO SPRAY EASEMENT) WITH COUNTY) --------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------L--L---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- vision-, MSN 11/06/03 PROPOSED RETAIL REam M CONCEPT A L HWY 99 AND GARNER LANE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN CC-2 CHICO, CALIFORNIA 130121 S.E.S=Ysldelload, T(503)659-950D WED 2003010.0138.00 Sft.21S F(503)659-2227 OR 97015 —0 pw-- ........... :,,��'UNTY Inter-Departmental Memorandum DEC 1 12003 DEVELO$X1iNT 200 SEBIWIbA LENT To: Stephen Betts, Senior Planner . SERVICES From: Ted Crawford, Fire Department Subject: Pre-development review for a pre-development meeting for retail store in North Chico Date: December 10, 2003 Based on the information furnished for the pre-development meeting on the new proposed retail shopping area in north Chico at Garner and Esplanade, the following would be the minimum requirements: 1. Meet the Uniform Fire Code for access and water requirements for fire protection. This will require a pressurized water system in an area that currently does not have a water system. These requirements may change as a result of any additional information regarding this project. I will be available for the meeting on December 12, 2003. If there are any questions please contact me at 538-7994. CC: B. Redding Chrono File 1 , L } �1:ji �%y I7t'1Gr{ z3r:i� !{J�.c,��' li,i�N;ji�1I.S f.31� ;;;��:es!,l.Jf'',��:;�. � �: 'Ct>��� �t f�°��r w":.;. :wy1;'� c7f:r:•;�i�J' �; ii3'� t.�'..„• , ,:`•:C�� t.S."9A G� C"[1u 7 is ;- la2C"il Olt f:+Lje z +.� !t � i ( - f �d �. €' � r� it �;+..}`.� iv 1:Si_ltd' iU't.t !::.t�;l.0}l1 ,.I�w ii•chtJ �h QN32 isO UMI, •(:';iC:�t�•;."r!'�:.; •`Jii +r'tFt �,ti: (?�r.% f (iJ.':�?�?Cily_>�v:�Z�tfi' .r5�rt��� t , i s.Y !; ±a�j SS f1l;0 j �Jti•IXA-0 i ;;"84i h :'u 'Sur. Le.�t";L�:t��'.l-�r {�i:C-'�"-.lf.�Cf 1'J`Ir�i'tjC.l 5�: :�J;•r 11.Jliiii.!.itiis> i.E•i:I('�3�r:fifJ�r�r��: -.,,ury- f, rt),i.••; 1. �r a C„ f �"ir• C'�r ��; :taiiwl ;:;53 ,3 .i3 '.J l: .,. �It. ? c �l ` r'4"MC, t '. I':St7 icx. "G= , -3. k"1FRi'�i1.�Jr7J :t t�iti.J os..o'c"!,o J;~L { :E pi tr At ALOS) Ilk. -LOS th -Eidstibd Los,- - - _C4no Orin LOS, M.! tbn3R, improvements M gh ..2010) J7 Ap. • o A%Nw AN* III 77 7'71 1, - e. 7 • ---------- IN -ol!ff� tie e 46 -LOS 018" 71 'fit -ning lt�160no br�trilf -,,toi mpro vomen 0- — Z�� 't -;. too /F. 7-7 fag r,�12 vs 4A All ,Ift lot' T� i lip _'VIA fi zv I................... ------r,.+...- Z . Zad T _ k ,-. - Lsvvfi .,�i•-Se i�e�(Lfl8) a ak , :_ .-:- - -:-. . - :��� -:.-.. ry -♦ - '-.LOS, - - ..v. +a' } .: - - Tom' -Jh. "1"c'lir :f - _ - a�rto _ LOS.In -201V - a : �. t-LOS. t _ �a 4 `tcoftficF.;turala = o _ .. - _ . men3 on �r8 _ - t fit* 3R _89j-' 'lm rovem3a. S _ _ - - f' _ '•. - - - {. Y.C. .¢�:.t%4F"'- "T1'� •}-s,._ � F .. ' - -.2010) TiS'.: rS. w roe h - 1: L » p k -1. .Y - 1- , yl.�'^ '3- - K �t y `'F -.< < y{y .�..:-.-�, ...;...:. < , _..;.. ., .' - - •.-..;L'...: Fey •• - <,l�•'S�5 `�'� ai� L .�.�{'� L=- 4�� y� -_ .. _ .- • r S F { .. .. ';=ems' `?,f• J,,tv - sL ., _ _ - - _ _ _ .S y."� •4'.�.}�. -b �•" MOM-41 Zol �. .• > VON Am A Vi _ _ s: ems• - .. Y - 4 . x •tom. ... - - - aw' -' - — x ` im, • FE ..'^' �..: 'r0•� r..,, �': _ .:�- =;•,s,.. 'y.ari' ;: -TSA-{,_�_ S _ - _ M- rr:+-'" _ _ "ice - • 'T.: 1� ay,�� _.•� `... :� - - _ i� may+^yam•^ t_ 44 31, ' � •" _. _.. .r _ t t' 1 _ 'SRI _ s , • . - .i i Ri '�+' <: - Fc.. wY'1 f�f T _ fl?•Y �f,- Vk ��4 ?•-` 2 „�-` � L• IN,. , , "y t-``fyt •.�'. 1 • • California Regional Water Quality control Board Aw Central Valley Region >:,•• Terry Tamminen Arnold Schwarzenegger Secretaryfor Redding Office Governor Environmental 415 Knollcrest Drive,Suite 100,Redding,California 96002 Protection Phone(530)224-4845•FAX(530)2244857 http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwgcb5 BUTTE COUNTY 10 December 2003 . DEC 12 20M DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Stephen Betts Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 PRE-APPLICATION COMMENTS ON PROPOSED PACLAND SHOPPING CENTER, GREATER CHICO,BUTTE COUNTY We have reviewed a pre-application package for a proposed shopping center just north of Chico. The project proponent, PacLand proposes to construct a 208,300 square-foot shopping center on 20.02 acres of land. According to our information, the nearest regional sewer is 1.4 miles from the project location. Therefore, on-site sewage disposal is proposed. We have the following comments on the proposed project. Wetlands and/or stream course alteration—The project proponent may need to apply for a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit(§404 permit) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A §404 permit is required for activities involving a discharge of dredged or fill material to waters of the United States. "Waters of the United States" include wetlands, riparian zones, streambeds, rivers, lakes and oceans. The Army Corps of Engineers Butte County contact for §404 permits is Ms. Laura Whitney, (916) 557-7455. Projects requiring a §404 permit also require a water quality certification(pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act) verifying that the project does not violate State water quality standards. A water quality certification is required for any project that impacts water of the State (such as streams and wetlands). Activities that fall under the water quality certificationprocess include, but are not limited. to: stream crossings, the modification of stream banks or stream courses, and the filling or modification of wetlands. A water quality certification must be obtained prior to construction. Failure to obtain a water quality certification, when required, may result in enforcement action. The Regional Board Contact for water quality certifications is Scott A. Zaitz, who can be reached at the letterhead address or by telephoning (530) 224-4784. Industrial storm water—The USEPA on 16 November 1990 promulgated storm water regulations (40 CFR Parts 122, 123 & 124) which require specific categories of industrial facilities discharging storm water to obtain NPDES permits and to implement Best Available Technology Economically Achievable (BAT) and Best Conventional Pollutant Control Technology (BCT) to reduce or eliminate industrial storm water pollution. Aggregate will be mined and processed at the site. As such, Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) 1442 (Construction Sand and Gravel) applies. Operations with a 1442 SIC code must be covered by a General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with California Environmental Protection Agency �a Recycled Paper 'y Stephen Betts - 2 - 10 December 2003 Industrial Activities. To obtain coverage under the General Permit lease contact the Redding office of g �p g o the Regional Board(see letterhead for contact information). Construction storm water - A Construction Activities Storm Water Permit is required for storm water discharges associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation result in a land disturbance of one acre or more.. Storm water discharges from construction activity that results in a land disturbance of less than one acre, but which is part of a larger common plan development of one acre or more, also requires a construction storm water permit. A construction storm water permit, if required, must be obtained prior to construction. Failure to obtain a construction storm water permit, when required, may result in enforcement action. Construction sto--n water permits can be obtained from Scott A. Zaitz(see above contact information). Dewatering Alternative 1: discharge to storm drains or waters of the United States - A dewatering permit, General Order for Dewatering and Other Low Threat Discharges to Surface Waters, may be required for construction activities. This general NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System)permit covers the discharge to waters of the United States of clean or relatively pollutant-free wastewater that poses little or no threat to water quality. The following categories are covered by the dewatering permit: well development water; construction dewatering; pump/well testing; pipeline/tank. pressure testing; pipeline/tank flushing or dewatering; condensate discharges; water supply system discharges; miscellaneous dewatering/low threat discharges. The dewatering permit applies only to direct discharges to waters of the United States. Failure to obtain a dewatering permit, when required, may result in enforcement action. An application form and a copy of the permit are available at this office. Dewatering Alternative 2: discharges to land - Construction dewatering discharges that are contained on land (i.e., will not enter waters of the United States) are allowed under a general waiver adopted under Regional Board Resolution No. R5-2003-0008,provided the following conditions are met: (1) the dewatering discharge is of a quality as good as or better than underlying groundwater; and (2)there is a low risk of nuisance. Examples of dewatering discharges to land include a terminal basin, irrigation (with no return to waters of the United States), and dust control. You may request written confirmation from this office that the waiver is applicable. Wastewater treatment and disposal - On-site disposal of wastewater may require issuance of Waste Discharge Requirements by the Regional Board. An application fo_ Waste Discharge Requirements may be obtained by contacting Regional Board staff as indicated below. If you have any questions, please contact me at(530) 224-3249 or the letterhead address. Ray Bruun, P.E. Associate Engineer Shasta-Cascade Watershed RB: sae cc: Doug Fogel, Butte County Environmental Health Division, Oroville Cliff Bottenfield, Butte County Environmental Health Division, Chico COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING 411 Main Street CITYorCHICO F0. Box 3420 INC.pan Chico, CA 95927 (530) 895-4851 Fax (530) 895-4726 http://vvww.ci.chico.ca.us December 11, 2003 Stephen Betts, Senior Planner Development Services Department Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA. 95965-3397 Subject: APN: 006-400-025 through 029, Pre-Development Review for PACLAND Dear Stephen: Thank you Tor the opportunity to comment on this proposed commercial redevelopment of 20 acres with a 208,300 square foot retail building and parking facilities for 1,039 vehicles, located north of the intersection of Garner Lane and the Esplanade. The City Planning Division forwards the following comments: 1) The City recommends that the County deny the use permit because the proposed development is located on property that is unserved by sanitary sewer. The use of on- site wastewater treatment for a retail facility of this scale and intensity does not appear appropriate. 2) Connection to sanitary sewer, which would need to be extended from its location at Eaton and the Esplanade, requires annexation to the City of Chico. It is not known whether the project site can be served by gravity flow,the unknown being the crossing of Mud/Sycamore Creek. 3) Should the County conduct environmental review (which is not required for projects that are denied),the City recommends that an environmental impact report be prepared that addresses aesthetics, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, population,and housing,public services,transportation/traffic,and utilities and service systems (as well as any additional impacts that may be identified). Cumulative and growth-inducing impacts should be addressed, and the required analysis of project alternatives should include discussion of potential alternative sites that may be environmentally superior. 4) As noted above, and with continents sent recently for the Guernsey and Hauslet subdivision proposals, traffic analysis should be required to assess impacts to area el Made From Recycled Paper i L roadways, particularly SHR 99 at Garner Lane and Eaton Road. At a minimum, improvements should be consistent with the "Garner Lane - Mid to Long Term Alternative"plan(copy attached)from the Chico Corridor Study prepared for the Butte County Association of Governments in January, 2001, and the improvements mentioned in 5, 6 and 7. 5) Garner Lane should be improved with full urban improvements to the 2-lane collector standard. 6) Esplanade/Garner Lane Realignment: the realignment as shown could be considered. 7) Esplanade:Full urban improvements should be required consistent with the results of the current planning effort for the Northwest Chico Planning Area Specific Plan. 8) Provide a circulation and parking analysis should be provided. 9) Storm drainage will need to be conveyed to Mud/Sycamore Creek. The lines will need to be sized for the entire tributary area identified as 776-44 (copy attached). Preliminary sizes show a60 inch outfall. The project developer will be responsible for storm drain and sewer improvements on Garner Lane as well as in the Esplanade. 10) The fire flow requirements for a building of 208,300 square feet and protected by automatic fire sprinklers would 6,000 gallons per minute. This would require a minimum of 4 public fire hydrants. 11) The minimum turning radii of 28 feet inside and 48 feet outside should be provided for on-site circulation. 12) Access roads less than 36 feet require Fire Lane No Parking identification on one side and roads.less than 28 feet require Fire Lane No Parking identification on both sides. 13) A delivery area or zone should be in a suitable location to provide parking for delivery vehicles that do not use the loading dock/s such as UPS, photo deliveries, pharmaceuticals, etc. Again,the city staff appreciate the chance to comment on this proposal and I am available at 895- 4853, if you have further questions about this response. Sincerely, To ayes Senior Planner CC: A-BC-7 w/referral info B.C.A.G. LIBRARY COPY PSSpC1ATI ON OF w° DRAFT Chico C 00" Corridor Study "SSOCIATIO'L4 O�G I r I I I y 1 In Butte County on State Route 99 � .3 from Estates Drive (PM 28.3) to Esplanade (PM T38.2) January, 2001 UINCY ENGINEERING, INC. WIN 111111! `. �.rSt'��4b .\'lk�`bd•J� ¢r'`��i:.��,*���.��r��ft�fs:J�.-iw!.�ril � .■�''f. ' ,�•�:,.�,°,, . Vn:34;;•�•'�r,1x++�Ll�'S„t3 v�Fj�l.4:'v��� .�'�.�,-z�l xN��I �sv a f� K �� C��Pi n•' t,�I_ �?�jsTr�ik�F��3af.�f�i�rYi��u"�I•■■. t % f i :s V. -,pg- "OT S,yi•�•`•,� � Yf �� �� +n:•� l } �r4p:t�Y:t,���f,�xV,Rr:�kr�:•,�'D_��gS{}�,a?±1 MR �Y7r �•y�dl`�t��6afe,;r`, X11.:i `•LJF;�f' r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING 411 Main Street CITYorCHICO P.O. Box 3420 INC.1e7z Chico, CA 95927 (530) 895-4851 Fax (530) 895-4726 http://www.ci.chico.ca.us December 11, 2003 Stephen Betts, Senior Planner Development Services Department Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA. 95965-3397- Subject: 5965-3397Subject: APN: 006-400-025 through 029, Pre-Development Review for PACLAND Dear Stephen: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposed commercial redevelopment of 20 acres with a 208,300 square foot retail building and parking facilities for 1,039 vehicles, located north of the intersection of Garner Lane and the Esplanade. The City Planning Division forwards the following comments: 1) The City recommends that the County deny the use permit because the proposed development is located on property that is unserved by sanitary sewer. The use of on- site wastewater treatment for a retail facility of this scale and intensity does not appear appropriate. 2) Connection to sanitary sewer, which would need to be extended from its location at Eaton and the Esplanade, requires annexation to the City of Chico. It is not known whether the proj ect site can be served by gravity flow,the unknown being the crossing of Mud/Sycamore Creek. 3) Should the County conduct environmental review (which is not required for projects that are denied),the City recommends that an environmental impact report be prepared that addresses aesthetics, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, population,and housing,public services,transportation/traffic,and utilities and service systems (as well as any additional impacts that may be identified). Cumulative and growth-inducing impacts should be addressed, and the required analysis of project alternatives should include discussion of potential alternative sites that may be environmentally superior. 4) As noted above, and with comments sent recently for the Guernsey and Hauslet subdivision proposals, traffic analysis should be required to assess impacts to area Bf$ Made From Recycled Paper t L roadways, particularly SHR 99 at Garner Lane and Eaton Road. At a minimum, improvements should be consistent with the "Garner Lane - Mid to Long Term Alternative"plan(copy attached)from the Chico Corridor Study prepared for the Butte County Association of Governments in January, 2001, and the improvements mentioned in 5, 6 and 7. 5) Garner Lane should be improved with full urban improvements to the 2-lane collector standard. 6) Esplanade/Garner Lane Realignment: the realignment as shown could be considered. 7) Esplanade:Full urban improvements should be required consistent with the results of the current planning effort for the Northwest Chico Planning Area Specific Plan. 8) Provide a circulation and parking analysis should be provided. 9) Storm drainage will need to be conveyed to Mud/Sycamore Creek. The lines will need to be sized for the entire tributary area identified as 776-44 (copy attached). Preliminary sizes show a 60 inch outfall. The proj ect developer will be responsible for storm drain and sewer improvements on Garner Lane as well as in the Esplanade. 10) The fire flow requirements for a building of 208,300 square feet and protected by automatic fire sprinklers would 6,000 gallons per minute. This would require a minimum of 4 public fire hydrants. 11) The minimum turning radii of 28 feet inside and 48 feet outside should be provided for on-site circulation. 12) Access roads less than 36 feet require Fire Lane No Parking identification on one side and roads less than 28 feet require Fire Lane No Parking identification on both sides. 13) A delivery area or zone should be in a suitable location to provide parking for delivery vehicles that do not use the loading dock/s such as UPS, photo deliveries, pharmaceuticals, etc. Again,the city staff appreciate the chance to comment on this proposal and I am available at 895- 4853, if you have further questions about this response. Sincerely, To A�ayes Senior Planner CC: A-BC-7 w/referral info B.C.A.G. LIBRARY COPY PSgpClATION OF 6 G0 w° DRAFT Z� �G CA Chico 00, Corridor Study G°o� '18800ATI0"'t0l I i a I - ' I In Butte County on State Route 99 from Estates Drive (PM 28.3) to Esplanade (PM T38.2) January, 2001 QUINCY ENGINEERING, INC. - t �111111111�111111l._�� `��hN',�J,�f,��'�-,'�J,��F�'Sf��i.S[��,x°fil+l;"""k�i` v .� ■■�p� ' , •vey.. c�,+ i,�„�t��t"�..Y.1.YG�n! a', �y.�,....,,.:., ?!�1 —,�.-,.-..�. -• � t t�' �r�t Huh' �� �\ ��I� ''y(tE�t;�L yr'n�F�t f� wk'(;E�,3cc"��{�.i'�4E'�h I■■.t ftr�'�'J�..'!.�$J f J d' 61`'�f ��p�r d��✓.f�'rh t t.re !✓k'�'YF.! ^'ism gl' fIL'a' � ��t�.re�tN..�.r �5'✓t� �}3 �y,�4•{ti y�`�Y�,-"tz�5sy \ � ,�i qr' }•rRON "u�•z r �P a�:il Sy,��Y1 �fK��,✓��{trh r� �N t s i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING g'� 411 Main Street CITYorCHICO FO. Box 3420 INC.1872 Chico, CA 95927 (530) 895-4851 Fax (530) 895-4726 http://www.ci.chico.ca.us December 11, 2003 Stephen Betts, Senior Planner Development Services Department Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA. 95965-3397 Subject: APN: 006-400-025 through 029, Pre-Development Review for PACLAND Dear Stephen: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposed commercial redevelopment of 20 acres with a 208,300 square foot retail building and parking facilities for 1,039 vehicles, located north of the intersection of Garner Lane and the Esplanade. The City Planning Division forwards the following comments: 1) The City recommends that the County deny the use permit because the proposed development is located on property that is unserved by sanitary sewer. The use of on- site wastewater treatment for a retail facility of this scale and intensity does not appear appropriate. 2) Connection to sanitary sewer, which would need to be extended from its location at Eaton and the Esplanade, requires annexation to the City of Chico. It is not known whether the project site can be served by gravity flow,the unknown being the crossing of Mud/Sycamore Creek. 3) Should the County conduct environmental review (which is not required for projects that are denied),the City recommends that an environmental impact report be prepared that addresses aesthetics, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, population,and housing,public services,transportation/traffic,and utilities and service systems (as well as any additional impacts that may be identified). Cumulative and growth-inducing impacts should be addressed, and the required analysis of project alternatives should include discussion of potential alternative sites that may be environmentally superior. 4) As noted above, and with comments sent recently for the Guernsey and Hauslet subdivision proposals, traffic analysis should be required to assess impacts to area 06 Made From Recycled Paper roadways, particularly SHR 99 at Garner Lane and Eaton Road. At a minimum, improvements should be consistent with the "Garner Lane - Mid to Long Term Alternative"plan(copy attached)from the Chico Corridor Study prepared for the Butte County Association of Governments in January, 2061, and the improvements mentioned in 5, 6 and 7. 5) Garner Lane should be improved with full urban improvements to the 2-lane collector standard. 6) Esplanade/Garner Lane Realignment: the realignment as shown could be considered. 7) Esplanade:Full urban improvements should be required consistent with the results of the current planning effort for the Northwest Chico Planning Area Specific Plan. 8) Provide a circulation and parking analysis should be provided. 9) Storm drainage will need to be conveyed to Mud/Sycamore Creek. The lines will need to be sized for the entire tributary area identified as 776-44 (copy attached). Preliminary sizes show a 60 inch outfall. The project developer will be responsible for storm drain and sewer improvements on Garner Lane as well as in the Esplanade. 10) The fire flow requirements for a building of 203,300 square feet and protected by automatic fire sprinklers would 6,000 gallons per minute. This would require a minimum of 4 public fire hydrants. 11) The minimum turning radii of 28 feet inside and 43 feet outside should be provided for on-site circulation. 12) Access roads less than 36 feet require Fire Lane No Parking identification on one side and roads less than 28 feet require Fire Lane No Parking identification on both sides. 13) A delivery area or zone should be in a suitable location to provide parking for delivery vehicles that do not use the loading docks such as UPS, photo deliveries, pharmaceuticals, etc. Again, the city staff appreciate the chance to comment on this proposal and I am available at 895- 4853, if you have further questions about this response. Sincerely, To ayes Senior Planner CC: A-BC-7 w/referral info i B.C.A.G. LIBRARY COPY PSSpCIATIONOF�L� w° DRAFT �G CA Chico Corridor Studypa�� --ISSOCIATIOl`1 01 G I NOW I - ' I In Butte County on State Route 99 from Estates Drive (PM 28.3) 1 to Esplanade (PM T38.2) January, 2001 QUINCY ENGINEERING, INC. _ aa° e� e Legend 1 :8400 Storm Drain Sub-Area J,vIf Fut"FaWNw C # CG REV 3/19/2001 �i:�v StomWreln TM-AM Ates ti� Not in a 100-year flood zone No erosion potential No known faults Adobe Lilly habitat—not State or Federal listed In City of Chico Sphere of Influence In Chico Urban Area Impacts: Traffic (traffic study required) Comments from Caltrans required Biological/botanical (biological study required, including survey for wetlands and jurisdictional waters) Archaeological (archaeological survey required) Air Quality(dust suppression during construction, construction equipment emissions during development, vehicular emissions during operation - air quality analysis required) Aesthetics (outside lighting, landscaping) Stormwater runoff(drainage plan, RWQCB permits) Growth-inducing impacts Off-site improvements impacts (drainage, circulation, dom.stic water) On-site sewage disposal services EIR may be required OVA MEMO - !M M NINE low NO if Oil; jMEN 011111 11 NONE _ monolog NJ IS 1 t r r ' r NN 3EIC ` 15U --------------- ---- -- -- ---------- ---------------------- -- - - - - - - -- - - - T-IT ------ -- -- - --- WNPS On-line Inventory - 6th edition: record fritillaria_pluriflora Page 1 of 3 UL M01 C-Oname. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants x6.210- 13-03 Status: record fritillaria_pluriflora -Fri Dec 12 09:21:11 2003 scientific Fritillaria pluriflora name common adobe-lily name family LIIiaceae CalPhotos dlp image i © 1997 John Game follow link for photo data life form bulbiferous herb CNPS List LIST 1 B:Rare,threatened,or endangered in California and elsewhere. CNPS List List 1 B and RED key CNPS RARITY 2:A limited number of occurrences in California,occasionally more if each occurrence is small. R-E-D 2-2-3 ENDANGERMENT 2:Fairly endangered in California code DISTRIBUTION 3:Endemic to California. CA state None listing federal None listing where Topographic quads: found Dixon (498A)*, Elmira (498C)*, Monticello Dam (515D), Walter Springs (516A), Rumsey(531 B), Glascock Mtn. (532A), Wilson Valley (532B), Jericho Valley(532C), Knoxville(532D), Leesville (547B), Wilbur Springs (547C), Salt Canyon (547D), Rail Canyon (563B), Lodoga (563C), Sites (563D), Stonyford (564A), Gilmore Peak(564D), Cherokee(576A), Shippee (576C)*, Chico (577A)*, Fruto NE (579A), Chrome (580A), Elk Creek(580D), Richardson Springs NW (5938), Nord (593C)*, Richardson Springs (593D), Vina (594A), Black Butte Dam (595D), Hall Ridge(596C), Newville(596D), Red Bluff East (610B), Lowrey(612D) . Red marks signify uncertainty [?] or extirpation[*]. See quad list above.A complete key is http://www.northcoast.corn/—cnps/cgi-bin/cnps/sensinv.cgi/Show?_id=fritillaria_pluriflor... 12/12/2003 %CNPS On-line Inventory - 6th edition: record fritillaria_pluriflora Page 2 of 3 on the Index by Topo Quad page. • Quad Mark Identifier • Marks are smaller than the quads they represent, and are generally positioned near . the center of the quad. In some coastal quads, this will place the mark offshore. Quad boundaries do not coincide with county lines. To confirm county location, refer to the county list below. Counties, states, regions: Butte (BUT), Colusa (COL), Glenn (GLE), Lake (LAK), Napa (NAP), Solano(SOL), Tehama (TEH), Yolo (YOL) counties map A reminder: Species not recorded for a given area may nonetheless be present, especially where favorable conditions occur. CNPS -Chaparral (Chprl) habitats •Cismontane woodland (CmWld) -Valley and foothill grassland (VFGrs)/often adobe blooming Feb-Apr period elevation 60 - 705 meters range notes Threatened by grazing, vehicles, development, mining, and horticultural collecting. full name Fritillaria pluriflora Benth. Additional information: standard acronym FRPL Element Code key PMLILOVOFO global rank key G2 state rank key S2.2 CalFlora this taxon L--7J' related taxa registration encouraged Lu Jepson `��,� Jepson Manual and other resources Online 50 Google ,s a CNPS website entire web search Entered 66.81.79.1 12 2003/10/14 00:55 Suggested citation: California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2003. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v6.2). Rare Plant Scientific Advisory Committee, David P. Tibor, convening editor. California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, CA. Accessed on Dec. 12, 2003 from http://www.cnps.org/inventory http://www.northcoast.com/—cnps/cgi-bin/cnps/sensinv.cgi/Show?_id=fritillaria_pluriflor... 12/12/2003 �i let, ' Amt �t' t � }� i• to ���� �� �, {`1 �• may, r i f IA; = �► i r� yti R am 4V r+ }� .✓� 1tf `•.. ..fir .� 5•' 1 /-, r �— /"• ".l1+-�f \ •It one Ilk ,.1. . �/ J + i •1Y� � `� �-•r+�.t�� oaf �j.,. A Inter-Departmental Memorandum To: Stephen Betts, Senior Planner From: Ted Crawford, Fire Department Subject: Pre-development review for a pre-development meeting for retail store in North Chico Date: December 10, 2003 Based on the information furnished for the pre-development meeting on the new proposed retail shopping area in north Chico at Garner and Esplanade, the following would be the minimum requirements: 1. Meet the Uniform Fire Code for access and water requirements for fire protection. This will require a pressurized water system in an area that currently does not have a water system. These requirements may change as a result of any additional information regarding thisjroect. P I will be available for the meeting on December 12, 2003. If there are any questions please contact me at 538-7994. CC: B. Redding Chrono File Inter-Departmental Memorandum To: Stephen Betts, Senior Planner From: Ted Crawford, Fire Department Subject: Pre-development review for a pre-development meeting for retail store in North Chico Date: December 10, 2003 Based on the information furnished for the pre-development meeting on the new proposed retail shopping area in north Chico at Garner and Esplanade, the following would be the minimum requirements: 1. Meet the Uniform Fire Code for access and water requirements for fire protection. This will require a pressurized water system in an area that currently does not have a water system. These requirements may change as a result of any additional information regarding this project. I will be available for the meeting on December 12, 2003. If there are any questions please contact me at 538-7994. CC: B. Redding Chrono File r BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 2770 Olive Highway, Suite C o Oroville, California 95966-6117 (530)538-7784 o Fax (530)538-2847 ® www.buttela€co.org BUT" MEMORANDUM covN ' NOV 2 6 KU33 TO: Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division FROM: Stephen Lucas, Principal Planner4- DEVELOFi—,:NT :� SUBJECT: Pre-Development Conference- PACLAND SERVICES DATE: November 24, 2003 The affected parcels are located within the boundaries of the following local agencies: 1. Butte County Mosquito and Vector Control District 2. Chico Area Recreation and Park District 3. Chico Unified School District 4. Butte Community College District 5. CSA No. 87 (Keefer Slough/Rock Creek Drainage) 6. CSA No. 164 (Animal Control) 7. Butte County Resource Conservation District While LAFCO has no position on the use of the property as planned, the comments below are intended to encourage cooperative,coordinated and cost effective planning in the Chico area which maximizes site development potential and the efficient delivery of services. 1. The parcel is located in the Chico Urban Area,the Chico Sphere of Influence and is pre-zoned for Community Commercial (CC) uses with a General Plan designation of Commercial Services. Consistent with County General Plan Land Use Element policy(1.2.b.), consultation with the City is encouraged to promote coordinated planning within the Sphere and ensure development is consistent with City of Chico standards. LAFCO policies discourage urban development without annexation to a city. 2. The parcels are located in the Chico Urban Area as designated by the County, and the Sphere of Influence, is consideration of the proposed urban use without annexation consistent with County General Plan Land Use Element policy (1.7a)which encourages annexation to existing cities to promote orderly development? 3. The proposal indicates the use of septic systems for sewage treatment. Is this consistent with County General Plan Land Use Element policy(5.2.a)which encourages the expansion of public sewer systems to new development that is consistent with adopted land use plans?The County is encouraged to direct the applicant to seek annexation to maximize the development potential of the parcel with the availability of the full range of municipal services which is maximizes the public investment in public facilities. 4. Should the County elect to approve the project as submitted, possible future annexation and sewer availability should be anticipated and septic systems should be designed for easy connection to municipal sewer service facilities. If you have any questions concerning these comments, please contact our office at your convenience. Inter-Departmental Memorandum To: Stephen Betts, Senior Planner From: Ted Crawford, Fire Department Subject: Pre-development review for a pre-developmer-t meeting for retail store in North Chico Date: December 10, 2003 Based on the information furnished for the pre-development meeting on the new proposed retail shopping area in north Chico at Garner and Esplanade, the following would be the minimum requirements: 1. Meet the Uniform Fire Code for access and water requirements for fire protection. This will require a pressurized water system in an area that currently does not have a water system. These requirements may change as a result of any additional information regarding this project. I will be available for the meeting on December 12, 2003. If there are any questions please contact me at 538-7994. CC: B. Redding Chrono File �.. MSatte oun y ..: ... LAND OF fJATU RAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2,,00.•;us,;.<.,b•;s;,� .;':'• 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 November 20, 2003 Subj: Pre-Development Conference To Whom It May Concern: The Butte County Development Services Department has received a request for a pre- development conference regarding a proposed 208,300 square foot retail store. The retail store use requires approval of a Use Permit. The proposed retail store project would consist of the following elements: • A 208,300 square foot retail store with general m--rchandise, pharmacy, grocery, minor auto service, and garden supplies • 1,039 parking stalls • Access to the proposed store would be from both Esplanade and Garner Lane • Realignment of the existing Esplanade/Garner Lan,- intersection • Widening of Esplanade and Garner Lane, installation of curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and the relocation of existing utility poles Please refer to the attached Conceptual.Site Plan provided by the applicant for additional information on the proposed project. The application indicates that sewage disposal . would be handled by an on-site septic system(s) and domestic water supplied via a public water system. The project site is located on the•northeast corner of Esplanade and Garner Lane, Chico. The project site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and has a General Plan land use designation of Commercial. The purpose of the pre-development conference meeting is to inform the applicant of local or state requirements that may apply to their project. This allows the applicant to incorporate those requirements into the design of the project when the actual project application is submitted. The pre-development conference will be held in the conference room located at 3-A County Center Drive (Butte County General Services), Oroville, on Friday, December 12, 2003, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. If your department or agency has concerns or comments regarding the proposal, please have someone attend or submit written comments to this department prior to the meeting. Comments may be faxed to (530) 538-7785, attention Stephen Betts. If you have any questions, please contact me at (530) 538-7153, or via e-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner Enclosures cc: Butte County Environmental Health Division Butte County Local Agency Formation Commission Butte County Agricultural Commissioner Butte County Public Works Department Butte County Agricultural Commissioner Butte County Fire Department/CDF Butte County Air Quality Management District City of Chico, Planning Department California Department of Fish and Game California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 5 (Redding Office) Caltrans District 3 Shell MacPherson, PACLAND Jeff Farrar, Main &Main Investments, LLC Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:54 AM To: Bottenfield, Cliff; Fogel, Doug; Crawford, Ted; Edell, Stuart; Kuykendall, Tom; Hill, Rob Subject: PACLAND Pre-Development Conference, Friday, December 12 Just a reminder that there is a pre-development conference for PACLAND scheduled for this Friday, December 12th, at 10:00. The meeting will be held in the 3-A conference room (the!building behind the Planning Division). Please ensure that you or your representative can attend the meeting. If not, please provide me with your comments/conditions of project approval prior to Friday. Thanks. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk-(530) 538-7153 Fax —(530)538-7785 12/8/2003 Page 1 of 3 Betts, Steve From: Shell MacPherson [smacpherson@pacland.com] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:08 AM To: Betts, Steve Cc: Shell MacPherson Subject: RE: Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Steve- Our group is available on the 12th from 10am-12pm. Let me know at your earliest convenience when you confirm the time and location. Thanks, Shell MacPherson PACLAND 2901 Douglas Blvd.,Suite 295 Roseville,CA 95661 Office:(916)771-9503 Fax:(916)771-3545 From: Shell MacPherson Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:47 AM To: 'Betts, Steve' Subject: RE: Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting I will start checking with the team for tentative meeting on Friday 12/12 10-12 am. thanks Shell MacPherson PACLAND 2901 Douglas Blvd.,Suite 295 Roseville,CA 95661 Office:(916)771-9503 Fax:(916)771-3545 From: Betts, Steve [mailto:SBetts@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:39 AM To: Shell MacPherson Subject: RE: Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting The second week in December is possible but Thursday (Dec. 11) is not available since we have a Planning Commission meeting most of that day. We most likely would not get comments from State agencies due to the short time period (most of the time State agencies don't comment or show up for the meeting anyway). Friday (Dec. 12)would be the best day, with morning (10-12) probably being the best time. I will have to find an open conference room, though. If that date/time works for you please let me know so I can make the necessary arrangements. 12/1/2003 Page 2 of 3 Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk-(530)538-7153 Fax —(530)538-7785 -----Original Message----- From: Shell MacPherson [mailto:smacpherson@pacland.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:23 AM To: Betts, Steve Subject: RE:Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Steve, we will likely have 4 people attending. Is there a possibility of meeting the second week of December? Thank you Shell MacPherson PACLAND 2901 Douglas Blvd.,Suite 295 Roseville,CA 95661 Office:(916)771-9503 Fax:(916)771-3545 From: Betts, Steve [mailto:SBetts@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:18 AM To: Shell MacPherson Subject: PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Mr. MacPherson, Sorry I missed your return call to me yesterday. I am trying to set up the pre-development meeting and want to make sure that you, or someone from your company, can attend. This is normally an easy process, but unfortunately our offices are currently being renovated and our conference room is unavailable- I now have to contact other departments to find an available conference room, and doing that makes it harder to set up the meeting. The week of Dec. 15-19 would allow sufficient time for County departments and State agencies to respond and/or schedule time for the meeting. Please provide me with an estimate of how many people from your company you believe will attend the meeting—the number of people attending will determine which conference room I need to reserve. Thank you. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk- (530)538-7153 Fax —(530)538-7785 12/1/2003 Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Shell MacPherson [smacpherson@pacland.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:23 AM To: Betts, Steve Subject: RE:Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Steve, we will likely have 4 people attending. Is there a possibility of meeting the second week of December? Thank you Shell MacPherson PACLAND 2901 Douglas Blvd.,Suite 295 Roseville,CA 95661 Office:(916)771-9503 Fax:(916)771-3545 From: Betts, Steve`[mailto:SBetts@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:18 AM To: Shell MacPherson Subject: PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Mr. MacPherson, Sorry I missed your return call to me yesterday. I am trying to set up the pre-development meeting and want to make sure that you, or someone from your company, can attend. This is normally an easy process, but unfortunately our offices are currently being renovated and our conference room is unavailable - I now have to contact other departments to find an available conference room, and doing that makes it harder to set up the meeting. The week of Dec. 15-19 would allow sufficient time for County departments and State agencies to respond and/or schedule time for the meeting. Please provide me with an estimate of how many people from your company you believe will attend the meeting—the number of people attending will determine which conference room I need to reserve. Thank you. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk- (530)538-7153 Fax —(530) 538-7785 12/1/2003 Page 1 of 2 Betts, Steve From: Shell MacPherson [smacpherson@pacland.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:47 AM To: Betts, Steve Subject: RE: Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting I will start checking with the team for tentative meeting on Friday 12/12 10-12 am. thanks Shell MacPherson PACLAND 2901 Douglas Blvd.,suite 295 Roseville,CA 95661 Office:(916)771-9503 Fax:(916)771-3545 From: Betts, Steve [mailto:SBetts@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:39 AM To: Shell MacPherson Subject: RE: Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting The second week in December is possible but Thursday (Dec. 11) is not available since we have a Planning Commission meeting most of that day. We most likely would not get comments from State agencies due to the short time period (most of the time State agencies don't comment or show up for the meeting anyway). Friday (Dec. 12)would be the best day, with morning (10-12) probably being the best time. I will have to find an open conference room, though. If that date/time works for you please let me know so I can make the necessary arrangements. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk-(530)538-7153 Fax —(530)538-7785 -----Original Message----- From: Shell MacPherson [mailto:smacpherson@pacland.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:23 AM To: Betts, Steve Subject: RE:Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Steve, we will likely have 4 people attending. Is there a possibility of meeting the second week of December? Thank you 12/1/2003 Page 2 of 2 Shell MacPherson PACLAND 2901 Douglas Blvd.,Suite 295 Roseville,CA 95661 Office:(916)771-9503 Fax:(916)771-3545 From: Betts, Steve [mailto:SBetts@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:18 AM To: Shell MacPherson Subject: PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Mr. MacPherson, Sorry I missed your return call to me yesterday. I am trying to set up the pre-development meeting and want to make sure that you, or someone from your company, can attend. This is normally an easy process, but unfortunately our offices are currently being renovated and our conference room is unavailable - I now have to contact other departments to find an available conference room, and doing that makes it harder to set up the meeting. The week of Dec. 15-19 would allow sufficient time for County departments and State agencies to respond and/or schedule time for the meeting. Please provide me with an estimate of how many people from your company you believe will attend the meeting—the number of people attending will determine which conference room I need to reserve. Thank you. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk- (530)538-7153 Fax —(530)538-7785 12/1/2003 Page 1 of 3 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:55 AM To: 'Shell MacPherson' Subject: RE: Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Shell, The pre-development meeting is set for Friday, December 12, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. It will be held in the conference room located at 3-A County Center Drive, which is behind the building in which the Planning Division is located. If you come to the Planning Division (7 County Center Drive)myself or someone else can take you over there. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk-(530) 538-7153 Fax —(530)538-7785 -----Original Message----- From: Shell MacPherson [mailto:smacpherson@pacland.com] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:08 AM To: Betts, Steve Cc: Shell MacPherson Subject: RE: Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Steve- Our group is available on the 12th from 10am-12pm. Let me know at your earliest convenience when you confirm the time and location. Thanks, Shell MacPherson PACLAND 2901 Douglas Blvd.,Suite 295 Roseville,CA 95661 Office:(916)771-9503 Fax:(9 16)771-3545 From: Shell MacPherson Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:47 AM To: 'Betts, Steve' Subject: RE: Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting I will start checking with the team for tentative meeting on Friday 12/12 10-12 am. thanks 12/1/2003 Page 2 of 3 Shell MacPherson PACLAND 2901 Douglas Blvd.,Suite 295 Roseville,CA 95661 Office:(916)771-9503 Fax:(916)771-3545 From: Betts, Steve [mailto:SBetts@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:39 AM To: Shell MacPherson Subject: RE: Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting The second week in December is possible but Thursday (Dec. 1'1) is not available since we have a Planning Commission meeting most of that day. We most likely would not get comments from State agencies due to the short time period (most of the time State agencies don't comment or show up for the meeting anyway). Friday (Dec. 12)would be the best day, with morning (10-12) probably being the best time. I will have to find an open conference room, though. If that date/time works for you please let me know so I can make the necessary arrangements. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk- (530) 538-7153 Fax —(530)538-7785 -----Original Message----- From: Shell MacPherson [mailto:smacpherson@pacland.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:23 AM To: Betts, Steve Subject: RE:Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Steve, we will likely have 4 people attending. Is there a possibility of meeting the second week of December? Thank you Shell MacPherson PACLAND 2901 Douglas Blvd.,Suite 295 Roseville,CA 95661 Office:(916)771-9503 Fax:(916)771-3545 From: Betts, Steve [mailto:SBetts@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:18 AM To: Shell MacPherson 12/1/2003 Page 3 of 3 Subject: PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Mr. MacPherson, Sorry I missed your return call to me yesterday. I am trying to set up the pre-development meeting and want to make sure that you, or someone from your company, can attend. This is normally an easy process, but unfortunately our offices are currently being renovated and our conference room is unavailable- I now have to contact other departments to find an available conference room, and doing that makes it harder to set up the meeting. The week of Dec. 15-19 would allow sufficient time for County departments and State agencies to respond and/or schedule time for the meeting. Please provide me with an estimate of how many people from your company you believe will attend the meeting—the number of people attending will determine which conference room I need to reserve. Thank you. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk- (530) 538-7153 Fax —(530) 538-7785 12/1/2003 Page 1 of 2 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:39 AM To: 'Shell MacPherson' Subject: RE: Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting The second week in December is possible but Thursday (Dec. 11) is not available since we have a Planning Commission meeting most of that day. We most likely would not get comments from State agencies due to the short time period (most of the time State agencies don't comment or show up for the meeting anyway). Friday (Dec. 12)would be the best day, with morning (10-12) probably being the best time. I will have to find an open conference room, though. If that date/time works for you please let me know so I can make the necessary arrangements. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk-(530) 538-7153 Fax —(530)538-7785 -----Original Message----- From: Shell MacPherson [mailto:smacpherson@pacland.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:23 AM To: Betts, Steve Subject: RE:Chico (N- Butte Co.) PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Steve, we will likely have 4 people attending. Is there a possibility of meeting the second week of December? Thank you Shell MacPherson PACLAND 2901 Douglas Blvd.,Suite 295 Roseville,CA 95661 Office:(916)771-9503 Fax:(916)771-3545 From: Betts, Steve [mailto:SBetts@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:18 AM To: Shell MacPherson Subject: PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Mr. MacPherson, Sorry I missed your return call to me yesterday. I am trying to set up the pre-development meeting and want to make sure that you, or someone from your company, can attend. This is normally an easy process, but unfortunately our offices are currently being renovated and our conference room is 12/1/2003 Page 2 of 2 unavailable- I now have to contact other departments to find an available conference room, and doing that makes it harder to set up the meeting. The week of Dec. 15-19 would allow sufficient time for County departments and State agencies to respond and/or schedule time for the meeting. Please provide me with an estimate of how many people from your company you believe will attend the meeting—the number of people attending will determine which conference room I need to reserve. Thank you. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk- (530)538-7153 Fax —(530) 538-7785 12/1/2003 Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:18 AM To: 'smacpherson@pacland.com' Subject: PACLAND Use Permit Pre-Development Meeting Mr. MacPherson, Sorry I missed your return call to me yesterday. I am trying to set up the pre-development meeting and want to make sure that you, or someone from your company, can attend. This is normally an easy process, but unfortunately our offices are currently being renovated and our conference room is unavailable- I now have to contact other departments to find an available conference room, and doing that makes it harder to set up the meeting. The week of Dec. 15-19 would allow sufficient time for County departments and State agencies to respond and/or schedule time for the meeting. Please provide me with an estimate of how many people from your company you believe will attend the meeting—the number of people attending will determine which conference room I need to reserve. Thankou. Y . Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk- (530) 538-7153 Fax —(530)538-7785 ,I 12/1/2003 •r MMN & MAIN INVESTMENTS, L.L.C. 2550 Lakewest llavc•Suite 50•Chico,California 95928 �I TO: fMR • Toe, 15,m gEg= CC: COMPANY: 1—t v.4 cftoti, g�Of�+N$w�^ 11E"Sj FAX: X38 — �'�� HATE: FROM: Jeff Farrar (530) 899-9200 FAX(530) 881-6238 NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDDiG COVER PAGE: 8 Urgent Reply For ApprovaUSignature 8 As Requested For Your Files ❑Original to Fallow Via Mail Comments: t W 14 C- r� OR�rol N CONFIDENTIALITY.NOTE 77i.DOCUEXNn ACCOMPAWANG71118PAIITRANSWISSION CONTAIN CKIIYAIN INFORMAMON WHICHIB PRIYILDDISb AND CONFtOKN7TAL 7711 INFORMAZON I5 UIIENDKD FOR THIS INDTIIDUAL Ott SNITI'Y NAWAO ON TH99I MSMITTAL SHEET.IF YOU ACIF NOTTHS INTKNOED RSCI WlINt. U AWAIkKTHATANY DISCLOSUR©ING,DISrRIDUYtON OP UK OF THE CONTEM OP M9 TRANSFASSION Is FrA MITED. IF YOU(SAVE RBCEI1tB0 THIS rAX IN SUOR P.LE W NOTIFY U8 AT 056)0834M. a,�d morrontr�•� Tod 9817'ON 98LL 829 02S f -lti I�'2, 3WW03 Wbd9N I 817:0 T 200?-/OT/TT 7j November 7,2003 Mr.Joseph Baker Planning Manager BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 RE: Proposed Retail PrOJeat NWC Hwy 99 and Garner Lane Chico,Calltomie Dear Mr.Baker: This letter shall authorize Main & Main Investments, t.LC or PACLAND Engineering to act on our behalf in processing the required land use application(s) in connection with the proposed retail project located at 13301 Garner Lane,commonly known as Sunset Hills Golf Course. Sincerely, Sunset Hills Golf Course, Inc. David Van Dyke, Presi ent a•�.�et�a T.� ero.e�i.wu.�.a. �Erna..... 2019 S817'ON S8LL 829 029 F IUI383WWOO Wbd9NI 817:01 200Z/OT/TT MAIN & MAIN INVESTMENTS, L.L.C. 2550 Lakewest Drive•Suite 50•Chico,Califomia 95928 BUTTE (530)899-9200•FAX(530) 891-6238 COUNTY NOV 12 2003 DEVELO AIENT November 10, 2003 SERV3CFs Mr.Joseph Baker Planning Manager BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 RE: Proposed Retail Project NWC Hwy 99 and Garner Lane Chico, California Dear Mr. Baker: You will find enclosed the original Letter of Authorization signed by the owner of the Sunset Hills Golf Course property. Please let me know if there is anything additional you need. I'll look forward to meeting with you at the pre- development meeting. Sincerely, Main & Main Investments, LLC eff Farrar Principal 61X) n\moire A.mein\Inftore\inff�ho4or 111MZ rinr "DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: )PecO OV-/0 AP# yW -025D"?g� DLJ APPLICANT: 6,q&.4W12 OWNER: �'Izzz,, o/ 772&/ REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSED REQUEST: (to be filled out by person taking in application) FINAL REQUEST: (to be filled out by project planner) o,,3 o D SIZE: Q c e s LOCATION: SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT# 3 EXISTING ZONING: C-2- GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Covv,vw•,vr'6 q 1 ASSIGNED PLANNER: J 1 V PLANNERS INITIALS Date Application Received Date Project Assigned 11 Irl ) 03 30 Day Complete Preset Hearing Date s COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST County Offices and Cities: Chief Administrative Officer X Develop.Services Director X Public Works Director X Environmental Health 7 Assessor Building Manager Sheriff BCAG ALUC X LAFCo %Air Quality Mgmt. Butte Co.Farm Bureau Biggs _Gridley Chico _Oroville _Paradise Chico Airport Commission Information Systems Dept. _Animal Control X Agricultural Commission X County Counsel Irrigation District: _Butte Water _Biggs/W.Gridley Water _Durham Irrigation _OWID _Paradise Irrigation _Richvale Irrigation Table Mountain Irrigation _Thermalito Irrigation _Other Domestic Water: _Butte Water District *California Water Service Co. _Del Oro Water Co. OW ID _Thermalito Irrigation District _Other Sewer: _Butte Water District _Themalito Irrigation _Sterling City Sewer Main _Skansen Subdivision(CSA 21) _L.O.A.PUD Fire Protection: X California Department of Forestry _EI Medio Fire Protection District Recreation Districts: _Chico Area Recreation _Durham Area Recreation _Feather River Rec.&Park Paradise Recreation&Park Richvale Recreation &Parks Utilities: _PG&E North-Chico _Chambers Cable TV _SBC(Pacific Bell) PG&E South-Oroville Viacom Cable TV State Agencies: CalTrans(Traffic) _Dept.of Water Resources Dept.of Fish and Game Forestry(Attn:Craig Carter) _Dept of Parks and Rec. _Highway Patrol Central Reg.Water Quality Cont. _Caltrans,Aeronautics Program _Off.of Governmental&Env.Relations _Department of Conservation _Off.of Mining Reclamation Dept.Social Services,Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies: _US Forest Service _US Bureau of Land Management _US Fish&Wildlife Service Army Corps of Engineers _National Marine Fisheries Service Other Districts,Agencies, Committees: _Lime Saddle Dist _Community Association School Districts _Drainage _Butte Envl.Council _Reclamation _Cal Native Plant Society _Butte Co.Mining Committee _Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _Paradise Pines Com.Assoc. _Butte Ck.Watershed Conservancy Mosq.Abatement.Oroville/Butte Co K:\PLANNING\FORMS\DISTR.LIS Y IA STREET NW �786.9500 Post-it"Fax Note •7671 Date (1paoges� F 360.786.5267 ' To L_ C From 98501 WWW.PACwND.COM CSR. cV t L� Co./Dept. Co. Phone# Q Phone# ji,;.y- �I EFax# Fax# (I L� W� t, 1 October 10, 2003 c�.� OCT 1 3 2003ID � BUTTE COUNTY Joe Baker � PLANNING DIVISION Butte County 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Subject: Proposed Retail Store, Esplanade and Garner Lane; Butte County, California Dear Joe: We appreciated the opportunity of meeting with you recently to discuss the redevelopment of property located in the northwest corner of the Esplanade and Garner Lane intersection. As you know, the site is zoned Commercial, C-2. In the C-2 zone, all C-1 uses are allowed outright, including retail. The C-1 zoning classification does not place any size restrictions on these uses. In our meeting we also discussed the section of the C-2 zoning code, which states, "shopping centers greater than 5 acres require a separate use permit approval." At the time of our meeting, we were not able to provide many specifics on how the site would likely be developed and whether the development should'formally be classified as a shopping center. To follow-up on this discussion, we have prepared the enclosed Site Plan, reflecting a single tenant. For your review, we have summarized below industry standard and other jurisdictions' municipal code definitions of the term "shopping center" to establish the fundamental characteristic of that specific type of development. Urban Land Institute Definition As you know, the Urban Land Institute (ULI) provides industry standard definitions and guidance regarding development, and the American Planning Association (APA) frequently uses the ULI publications. The ULI defines a Shopping Center as, "a group of architecturally unified commercial establishments." They also list the elements, which "characterize the Shopping Center and set it apart from other commercial land uses." One fundamental element, which is carried through the ULI definitions, is the presence of multiple tenants. The ULI also distinguishes between department stores and shopping centers. Municipal Code Definitions Furthermore, there are numerous jurisdictions that have defined "shopping centers" in their respective codes, which also reflect a shopping center being defined by whether there are multiple tenants. For instance, both the City and County of Sacramento define "shopping center" as a group of stores or commercial establishments that have common facilities such as parking, signage, landscaping and loading areas. October 10, 2003 Joe Baker, Butte County Page 2 The.City of Corte Madera defines "shopping center" as a complex of independently operated retail stores or services all with access to a shared parking lot. In the same vein, Placer County defines "shopping center" as commercial development on a single parcel containing five or more retail stores, service uses or other tenants, where each has individual entrances from a commonly-owned public area. The common thread in these shopping center definitions is the multiple tenancies and commonly owned public areas. As noted above, this commonality necessarily relies upon different ownership and shared space. The shopping center concept does not apply to this proposed development because there is one tenant and no shared access to any public or common areas. Based upon the ULI definitions above, and use of the term"shopping center" by other jurisdictions, since the proposed development includes only a single retail tenant, this project would not be considered a shopping center; thus, a Use Permit is not required. We appreciateyour review of these matters and look forward to discussing this with you further. Sincerely, AM Bill Dunning Principal 2003010.008.00/cigI jblt01 1 Sia"" o� a =t Ifni TTI ------------------------------ - ----------------------------------------- ------- ------- -------- -------- - --- ---- -- ------- --------- ................................................................... ................................................ .................................... ................................................. ............................................................................. ............................................................................................ ............... ................... ........................................................................................................................................... ....................................... .................... ......................................... ........................................... ................................... .......... SITE DATA ACOUESITIDN PARCEL 1 = 6.00 AC PARCEL 2 = 5.00 AC PARCEL 3 - 103 AC PARCEL 4 = 140 AC PARCEL 5 = 2.04 AC GARNER LANE R/W = 0.55 AC TOTAL = 20.02 AC USE RETAIL PARCEL 18.56 AC NEW GARNER LANE R1W 0.38 AC ............. OUTLOT 1 1018 IC 0 w TOTAL 20.02 AC ro EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL ...... o D BUILDING DATA ............ HMGI IW,4y( 9,9 PROPOSED RETAIL =208,300 SF .......... NOV - 7 2003 PARKING DATA qPROPOSED PARKING STANDARD =B113 STALLS ACCESSIBLE = 20 STALLS COMPACT 136 STALLS GRAPHIC SCALE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION RETAIL TOTAL 1039 STALLS PROPOSED PARIGNG RATIO =5.0 PER 1,000 SIF NOTES: I. ORAWN WITHOUT BENEFIT OF SURVEY ..................... . ....................................................... ................... . ............. ........................... ...... ... w LEGEND FOR ........................................................................................... ................. ............ ......... 14 4 a a 4 FENCED AREA - —————— ......... PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Q PROPOSED BUILDING .. PROPOSED IS*CURB 6 AND CUTTER 14 (2) PROPOSED PARKING SPACES ......... WHErl LANC IMMOVILIDITT INCLUDE H AVY DIFTY ASPHALTIC NEW CURB.GUTTER AND C--l.XAVEMENI 6 3 VJDrNWG TO 40, .... RELOCATION OF ......... SIDEWALK ON WEST SIDE. n4 PARCEL6.00 ACRES C C C EXISTING UTILITY POLES TO BEHIND THE NEW HEAVY DUTY ! SIDEWALK;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT C C C ILLUMINATION. STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTICCONCRETE PAVEMENT C C • c c C 30 TRUCK PROPOSED RIGHT IN/RIGHT OUT ACCESS 'A LIN C C -4: C • ......... 1-fl-mLaccH TC t C :c c Hb z, PROPOSED RETAIL c4* :e 3,0' ACRES 'ARC L 3 GROSS SF 20B,30D .................... 4 ................... C CC c X ljiLc _IlljCml L-1 C ........ C C C C C C Mcrc 'W1 fl- TI—ITFFL) fl*c- L 150 ASSOCIATE 4a PARKING SPACES BEHIND BUILDING ................ C C C C C C .................... -ITfl-I-1 TCL C C C C _rlL .......... —S PARCEL 4 3.40 ACM� .................. C C C III ICI 1114cil 1 G c ...................... PARCEL 2 5.00 ACRES .... I ... ........ c tfl-Mc 4fH+ccH-H+cH--H:cc"cc 1 1 1 'cl 1 1 "cl 1 1 C C C C S2 VACATED R/W I'E�bj C C C I I I 1cl I I I Icl I I C 2-10'X 6 BALE iLLIC41al PALLET ENCLOSURES - c ------------/----------------- - - ----- ------------------------------------------------ - - ......... C C C C C C C C C SEPTIC SYSTEM C C C m .... ........al C C C OUTLO .49 STORWWATER MANAGEMENT 1.08 ACR .......... . AREA 0.5 ACRES ........ ----------'---------- ---------------------------- ----------'---------- ------------------------- - -- - 1614.49 41 1111 R. PROPOSED RIGHT IN/rdGHT OUT RELOCATE EX. ESPLANADE 10'MDF PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY ACCESS WITH DECEL LANE. GARNER LANE R/W -—-—-—-—-—-- R/W—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—- ................................................................ -7. —--—--—--—--—--—--—--—- AN APPROXIMATE 14' - RE"ES NO CUSTOMER DOORS AGRICULTURAL ZONING ON SOUTH SIDE OF WIDENING;NEW CURB.CUTTER AND SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE; 669 STALLS IN FRONT AND ON P AGRICULTURAL ZONING SETBACK RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITY POLES TO BERND THE NEW NORTH SIDE OF STORE PROVIDE A OR ROOFTOP HVAC EDEA , SIDEWALK;STOMMINATER MANAGEMENT AND ILLUMINATION. 4.3 PARKING RATIO. M NO SPRAY EASEMENT------ MINN 3W OF AGRICULTURAL ESPLANADE.20V SETBACK REOUIRED FROM AL AGRICULTURAL ZONING FOR COMMERCIAL MS. (PER DEVELOPER COORDINATION ZONED AREA. (INCLUDING LOW NO SPRAY EASEMENT) VAIN COUNTY) - --------------------------------------------------—------------------------ --------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S! ..Zu.evi-i- .150-ripf, • ronE, MSN 11/06/03 PROPOSED RETAIL MEMOCONCEPT . ..... JRM HWY 99 AND GARNER LANE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN CC-2 h CHICO, CALIFORNIA 10121 S.E.SunMlWe ROad, 1(503)659-9SOO WED 20=10.00&00 SUIU`Z1SOR97015 eF(503)659.2227 Clackamas, -mil PACL-D.— 0000.0000. 0000. .......... ......................................... ............... .............. ............ R � d r 47-26 v! ,b —(4U 47-27 N 89010 36 E w (8) k" (6) (91 1"=600' a (10) (5) (ll) (4) 20 - - ---- -- 405.98 a - - --- -'- --- 2 (1 i (3) 3.79 21 AC (13) 56 1 I ' 84AC(9 9.IOAC ? -t 23 (14) 59 (I) 36/.70 PM 82-8' ' 1413.00 ---- ' 970.34CID 122, T 33 i 463.38 21-2 �463 OB F07-42' [07-01 26 I .1 1 a fPs9-le) 0 / 3-2 27 296. 316 7 �9 O34 �� Q4?2! 1 PM39-la 9e 42 o�PMT7-6z 4, PM 83-79 SFE 66 \y orn 35 28 360.90 DETAIL „A" ~ 1.5 Ac c tib. 6'j 9� s 29 8.70 AC 311.,9 2 31.5Ac � ,� i� 1• • 4 O.11 l 22.77AC ,� ` his 6 22 263.12 IZ7.= to 37 7 72 R\1 m�� \\.�2 6J '' -�i� . 4 2.o Ac s a ! Z e6 Ac m to �( p • ' t 4 0 vil 1.83Ac .Z'L oma, N d0 \\\ -'c�E6 pp `��' �• / 369 Ac c� 13T9 g+� �� �-... /' .. 63 t Q 2 68 V 1 52. 50 yJr 6�w ' PM/tt-t7 ' 0.02 78Ac „? gPp 777777-77,;-- - 63 69 71 2,2 _� DETAIL "7 A 7 " \ Ac .SlAc 6.50AC l 1"=400') e ae0.` –� 45.69AC 7A �Zg\ 02 58 n DETAIL 8 � 5 4 (1°= 400J �rti 6 Jr PM 59-18 7 8 N 88056'29"E 5292.21 8 9 3 55 Assessor's Map-No. 06-4C irk THESE PARCELS ARE FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES5 �'� County of Butte, CA. ' 0 ONLY AND MAY NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL PARCELS N�GK 4 y c 0 REVISED: o\1 Z 95 H T MOUNTAIN VIEW SUB NO 1., 16 M.O.R. 12 p10Rp SITE DATA \ ACOUISITION I PARCEL 1 = 6.00 AC , PARCEL 2 = 5.00 AC PARCEL 3 3.03 AC - PARCEL 4 = 340 AC PARCEL5 = 2.04 AC GARNER LANE R/W = 0.55 AC TOTAL - 20.02 AC USE ..... ......... .._.__.._._.... .. .' RETAIL PARCEL 18,56 AC ' NEW GARNER LANE R/W = 0.3BAC • -_ l OUTLOT 1 = 1.D8 AC ..........__.-......_.._.._...._... _A.o TO 2002 AC EIOSTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL TOTAL _ _ BUILDING DATA HIGHWAY 99 _....._...._. • •. ,,.._....__..._.__._..__...__. __ PROPOSED RETAIL =208,300 ff S PARKING DATA PROPOSED PARKING •� D STANDARD =883 STALLS . ` p ACCESSRE 20 STALLS COMPACT 176 STALLS RETAIL TOTAL =1039 STALLS �1 M GRAPHIC SCALE f 4,1 O\' n,03 PROPOSED PARKING RATIO =5.0 PER 1,000 SF �--�aosei i- ---�_�\.. _\ IV 1(' ilr NOTES: G T - 1 DRAW WITHOUT BENEFIT OF SURVEY \ .�\` BUTTE COUNTY _ DIVISION N �'� PU1 G D N N I N I VS LEGEND FOR FENCED AREA PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS �q \"11` / —�- PROPOSED BUILDING 6 BAY TLE « , `\` �\ PROPOSED 18'CURB e AND GUTTER ,\ ` PROPOSED PARKING SPACES 3 ,,` •J'.`\ GARNER LANE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE NCONCRETTEE PAVEMENT ASPHALTIC /r U WIDENING TO 40';NEW CURB.GUTTER AND C- ��tttt••�� _ :-::::':+ a ♦ ~ �/�'�. SIDEWALK ON WEST SIDE;RELOCAl10N W /', ... PARCEL '. 6.00 ACRES C L C ~ C fff��� , .�`� 2SWAL. TOO POLES TO 80!010 THE NEW fOAVY DUTY NGiETE PAVEMENT m.•:�:•..-::: L\ / \ 96Lk/JJL.OTOIIMWATGI MAIIACCEICNT eN0 C C C STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTIC V CONCRETE PAVEMENT ill § C C C C q s TRUCK'.• � / $, - _ y `hh . / • K' s PROPOSED RIGHT IN/RIGNT OUT ACCESS TURN AND i J C C c C C C p ! PROPOSED RETAIL ` _ ` ` 7eACRE ,RCEL 3 ....3.0', AS �\ --7. :.••,-..- GROSS SF'=20$300................... ifl ♦� - ..,�`4 C C C C C C C C / I 150 A55(K2AlE ^.�. 4 4 +s PARKING SPACES BEHIND BNIDWG _ •+i'::{w y / ,,\ • `' 3.40 ACRES PARCEL 4 PARCEL 2 - 5.00 ACRES :. \ \� c c c c c c c c c c c m _ \ VACATED R/W . 2-,0'K 45'BALE nh 7::'i:•i'r.y d C C C C C C C C i C ', T ,`\` �'., /., Tz L ` PALLET ENCLOSURES $; @ c c c c c C C C` c ~ i'A L, EL ' -�>3.Q ACRES .............. .............. .............. .............. ............. q SEPTIC SYSTEM s „ C C C C C C C C,� / OL 01 ® \` SiORNWATER MANAGEMENT }.... HILLIs 1.08 ACRES AREA „ 'i.36'-ir: - I I I (�` \ 0.5 ACRES / i �+ 1 ........... .......... t ` } O 3p Z g ---1'----------'---------------- — ._.�::.:•• --- ----------- — ------------------`— + —(—�—�--------------------- -- — E----------------------'—�:�'.---L---^mac-- PROPOSED RIGHTW/lyd 7 OUT RELOCATE EX.. ESPLANADE IO'WIDE PEDESTRIAN"AY - ACCESS WITH DECEL LANE GARNER LANE a R/W _______—_____ R N ESPLANADE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE AN APPROAMATE 14' a AGRICULTURAL ZONING SETBACK---- I - WIDENING;NEW CURB,GUTTER AND SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE; BB9 STALLS IN FRONT AND ON REOWtES NO CUSTOMER DOORS AGRICULTURAL ZONING ON SOUTH SIDE OF RELOCATION OF EXISTING UBUTY POLES TO BEHIND THE NEW NORTH SIDE OF STORE PROVIDE A ' OR ROOFTOP HVAC EQUIPMENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND ILLUMINATION. 4.3 PARKING RATIO. 100'NO SPRAY EASEUENT WITHIN 300'OF AGRICULTURAL ESPLANADE.200'SETBACK REQUIRED FROM I AGRICULTURAL ZONING FOR COMMERCIAL USES. ZONEAREA.DEVELOPER COORDINATION I ' (INCLUDING tOD NO SPRAY EASEMENT) , I &, WITH COUNTY) --------------------------------------------------- __ yo` Date_:.,By_� yRevis(on D sce n tion... ' � ces area ey, ssue oale� ° 1/0 '` PROPOSED RETAIL . � MSN „/O6/lL1 y , CONCEPT 40 , I HWY 99 AND GARNER LANE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN CC-2 �'k d- - �° �'� CHICO, CALIFORNIA 3 CT�ecked;By+ "'rPEojecl;No;;.;:;?: `a4��+.. ��r::i3::. csa�::.:?:".'�: 10121 5.E SunnysWe RDaE, T(503)659-9500 9 WED 2003010.008.00 Suite 215 F(503)659-2227 Oackal OR 97015 e—Il PulNm.o>, ' ..................................................................................................................... ............................................... ........... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ .......................................................................................... .................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................. w SITE DATA ACQUISFDON PARCEL I = 6.00 AC PARCEL 2 = 5.00 AC PARCEL 3 - 3.03 AC PARCEL 4 - 3.40 AC PARCEL 5 = 2.04 AC GARNER LANE R/W = 0.55 AC TOTAL 02 AC USE RETAIL PARCEL 1856 AC NEW GARNER LANE R/W 0.38Ac OUTLOT 1 1.08 AC_ TOTAL 20.02 AC E)OSTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL BUILDING DATA HIGHWAY 9,98.30D SF PROPOSED RETAIL -20 ......... PARKING DATA PROPOSED PARKING STANDARD =883 STALLS ACCESSIBLE 20 STALLS COMPACT 136 STALLS RETAIL TOTAL 1039 STALLS —Ap! GRAPHIC SCALE PROPOSED PARKING RATIO 5,0 PER I,OOD Si Nkink, OV 2003 NOTES: 1. DRAM WITHOUT BENEFIT OF SURVEY a ........................ ----------- --- . ..... ............................................................... .................................................... ......... ............................................................. ........................... BUTTE COUNTY LEGEND FOR ....... ......... ............................................... .......... .................... :.a...�..:a...... PLANNING DIVISION FENCED AREA PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ............... PROPOSED BUILDING ♦ PROPOSED III,aim 6 BAY ILE 6 AND GLITTER ............. .... T PROPOSED PARKING SPACES ..... GARNER LANE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE HEAVY DUTY ASPHALTIC ..........]f WIDENING TO 40%NEW CURB,GUTTER AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT ............... 4 SIDEWALK ON WEST SIDE,RELOCATION OF ........... C C �ETosnNG UTILITY POLES 10 BEHIND THE HEC.............. PARCELl 6.00 ACRES .......... SIDEWALK:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND W HEAVY OUTY CONCRETE PAVF.MFN7 C C C C MIRRATOL S IANDARO OUTY SP 3 CONCRETE PAVEMENTH-TIC C . ......... i c rcnTTrl:f rc f .. ......... ILIPW ANUN C PROPOSED RIGHT IN/RIGHT OUT ACCESS PROPOSED RETAIL' C C C C fmc: ......... C "C**'C I GROSS SF'-20IL3DO7eARCEL 3 ACRE a' .................. .................. ................. ....... IFFIFI-1 rcr I I C C C C C ........... 150 ASSOCIATE ......... PARKING SPACES ............ BEHIND BUILDINGC C C C C C C C I lI w C C C C C PARCEL 4 3.40 ACMES C C C C C C C ............ I IS 4 .......... .............. .............. T I I I TcTifl] C .......... .......... PARCEL 2 5,00 ACRES C C C c C c I c ................... VACATED R/W ............ ........ ............. C c. C C C C c .............. ♦ : I I I'* ,% ca u PALLET ENCLOSURES 1: C C C 2-10'X 45'BALE 61, tv ............ c cc H !I: c �,O IIJACRE, ------------------------------------------------ -------------I/---------------- c C C C C M JiLLILl J�c C C C I, SEPTIC SYSTEM S RMWATER MANAGEUEN TO .............. a 11-1-T-111-ICT-1-1-1'Fflf-mc 4.......... Z w 115 ACRES ............ ----------- --------------- ---------------------------I --- ------------- - --------------------- ---- L1614.49 \-PROPOSED RIGHT IN/RICHT OUT LRELOCATE EX. ESPLANADE 10.NIDE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY ACCESS WITH DECEL LANE a GARNER LANE&R/W -—-—-—-—-—-—- -—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-- R/W w ................................ --------------- ESPLANADE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE AN APPROXIMATE 14' WIDENING:NEW CURB,GUTTER AND SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE; 889 STALLS IN FRONT AND ON REOLARCS NO CUSTOM DOORS AGRICULTURAL ZONING ON SOUTH SIDE OF RELOCATION OF COMG U17UTY POLES TO BEHIND THE NEW NCRTH SIDE OF STORE PROVIDE A AGRICULTURAL ZONING SETBACK---- OR ROOFTOP HVAC EQUI ENT ESPLANADE.200'SMACK REOUIRED FROM SIDEWALK;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND ILLUMINATION. 4.3 PARKING RATIO. WITHIN 300'OF AGRICULPUMRAL OD'NO SPRAY EASEMENT--— AGRICULTURAL ZONING FOR COMMERCIAL USES. ZONED AREA. IOD' DEVELOPER COOROIHAIION (INCLUDING IGO-NO SPRAY EASEMENT) VAIN COUNTY) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- USN 11/06/03 PROPOSED RETAIL CONCEPT R71), CONCEPTUAL HWY 99 AND GARNER LANE SITE PLAN CC-2 r10 S.E.S-unnyskle Road, T(503)659-95011 CHICO, CALIFORNIA WED 2003010.008.00 Stifti,215 F(503)659-2227 Oackamas,OR 97015 —11 MAW— . .. .. ...... . .. ... SITE DATA ACQUISITION w . PARCEL 1 = 6.00 AC PARCEL 2 - SOO AC PARCEL 3 - 303 AC j PARCEL 4 - 140 AC PARCEL 5 - 2,04 AC GARNER LANE R/W = 0.55 AC TOTAL - 20.02 AC USE .... .......- ..._._ RETAIL PARCEL 86 AC NEW GARNERRNER (L LANE R/W 038 AC E1051WC 1RATFIC SIGNAL .. .._..._.__... TOTAL 20.02 AC = 1.08 AC - BUILDING DATA ...- HIGHWAy 99 PROPOSED RETAIL =208,300 SF i PARKING DATA PROPOSED PARKING i ., STANDARD -883 STALLS . 77 Xy n ACCESSIBLE - 20 STALL - '••� U COMPACT 136 SAl15 RETAIL TOTAL -1039 STALLS ' GRAP}BC SCALE _ _ PROPOSED PARKING RA71D 5.0 PER 1.00D SF _ NOTES: NOV - 7 2003 I. DRAWN WITHOUT BENEFlT OF SURVEY ♦ LEGEND FOR _ E ........................................................:::.:::::::.:: BUTTE TY / ":.b.,�...a...b..A 4...... FENCED AREA \ PLANNING D VN ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS `\ —rte PROPOSED BUILDING I 5 BAY TLE � _J rJ• `\ PROPOSED 18'CURB ♦, AND GUTTER r s •;?J�J!:;:'':: r ,\ ` PROPOSED PARKING SPACES F.9 GARNER LANE[MOVEMENTS INCLUDE T� HEAVY DEPAVEMENT VEMENTI CONCRETE PC / 6 WIDENING TO W;NEW CURB.GUTTER AND ♦ :::::::y g 4 SIDEWALK ON WEST SIDE:RELOCATION OF C C C y C \ ��\. EXISTING UTIUTY POLES TO BEHIND THE NEW HEAVY DUTY ... ................ PARCEL i 6.00 ACRES \\ ..........••.....•. ENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT ♦ c - - - - - OLUMINA710NTpiN_ WATER MANAGEMENT AND CS I \ CONCRETE PAVEMENT ♦♦ _ :. .)JD Cf I TRUCK.' I'Tu 6UND— $I' MIMIL - *" ,CC,. C C C CPROPOSED RICHT IN/RICIR OUT ACCESS Hb PROPOSED RETAIL ` ` f` `GROSS SF=208,30E ;; A{'��iEL ...J. , rILs ♦' O OM1 c c c c c r c c c - ,��/l1111 c ,�x ,9 I\ \\ 150 ASSOCIATE r - '- -' a PARKING SPACES '" ici:CSi BEHIND BUILDING :i3'r , :•:`.'�:in:.}~ C C C C - C C C C C ~C / •�\ • r . .....:y: -- PARCEL 4 .... 3.40 ACMES p PARCEL 2 - 5.00 ACRES C C C G C C CC C C C \ VACATED R/W - « �\ ♦ 2-10'X 45'SALE 61' u 61' $� \ � .............. CR \ PALLET ENCLOSURES----- _ _____ ------------------------------------------------ ------------- __ « ISA L i� ,E� q \ �F E c c c c c c c f c 11 ?Q A 4 41 SEPTIC SYSTEM/ iiia: a CRES C C C C C C C C r STORMWATER MANAGEMENT f 51 I I OU 08 OT / 0.5 ACRES AREA Om O _ / :::::" 8 L- L- . ::11:x . . III ....:� .- 1614.49 -� -- - 4j!� PROPOSED RIGHTIN/18CI1T OUT RELOCATE E%. _--_____-_--_____—_____—__ _ ESPLANADE - 10'W10E PEDESTRWALKWAY _—_____—___—_ __ACCESS WITH OECEI LANE-- GARNER UNE A:R/W __-_______-- ____- -@4-___-___--___ R/W --—•--—--—- _- - ESPLANADE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE AN APPROXIMATE 14' AGRICULTURAL ZONING SETBACK WIDENING NEW CURB,CUTTER AND SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE: 889 STALLS IN FRONT AND W REWIRES NO CUSTOMER DOORS RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITY POLES TO BENNO THE NEW NORTH 90E OF STORE PROVIDE A OR ROOFTOP HVAC EWPMENT ACRICULIURAL 20NING ON SWTIi SIDE aF SIDEWALK;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND ILLUMINATION. 4.3 PARKING RATIO. WITHIN JOO'OF AGRICULTURAL ESPLANADE 200 SETBACK REOIRRED FROM 100'NO SPRAY EASEMENT AGRICULTURAL ZONING FOR COMMERCIAL USES (PER DEVELOPER COORDINATION ZONED AREA. (WCI,UDING 100'NO SPRAY EASEMENT) WIN COUNTY) p� S ReviSlori.;D"escn tIDf1r -,sx Des�gned Byl g;;Issue Dail3 W� MSN 11/06/03 ® PROPOSED RETAIL Drawn 9y , HWY 99 AND GARNER LANE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN CC-2 AM CONCEPT 6 = 3 CheckedNBy ) .a pro(eeGNo,=' • CHICO, CALIFORNIA 10121 S.E.Sunnyside Road, T(503)659-9500 WED 2003010.008.00 Suite 215 F(503)659-2227 Ctadlamas,OR 97015 a-mall PAd--. ................................................................................................................................. ...................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................. .......................................................................................................................................... .......................................... ..................................................... SITE DATA ACQUISITION PARCEL 16.00 AC PARCEL 2 5.00 AC PARCEL 3 = 3.03 AC PARCEL 4 = 140 AC PARCEL 5 = 2.04 AC GARNER LANE R/W TOTAL C USE RETAIL PARCEL 1&56 AC NEW GARNER LANE R/W = 0.38 AC OUTLOT 1 1.08 AC TOTAL BUILDING DATA 20.D2 AC EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL HIGHWAY 99 PROPOSED RETAIL 206.300 SIF PARKING DATA PROPOSED PARKING STANDARD =883 STALLS 20 STALLS COMPACT 136 STALLS RETAIL TOTAL 1039 STALLS GRAPHIC SCALE PROPOSED PARKING RATIO =5.0 PER 1,000 SF A-_ NOTES: NOV 20 1. DRAWN WITHOUT BENEFIT OF SURVEY ................... .............................. ........... ................... *.......... .... ........ ...............................................I........ ............ BUTTE COUNTY LEGEND FOR .................................... DIVISION FINCED AREA PLANNING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS allPROPOSED BUILDING 6 BAY TLE PROPOSED IS*CURB AND GLITTER 6 Q) PROPOSED PARKING SPACES GARNER LANE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE HEAVY DUTY ASPHALTIC D 40:NEW CURB.GUTTER AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT 3 I'd ENING 10 4 RELOCATION OF .......... %A' SIDEWALK ON WEST SIDE. EXISTING ........... C C ...... ......... NG UTILITY POLES TO BEHIND THE NEW 6.00 ACRES C Uc_ SIDEWALK;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND "CRETE PAVEMENT ................. HEAVY DUTY .............. PARCEL 1 ILIUMINATUIN. F. G STANDARD DUTY SPHALTIC 60 CONCRETE PAVEMENT C I I Ll 4 TFncll I I C C C f3O'TRUCK ......... ' 7— ........ TURN'ARdILINDPROPOSED RIGHT IN/RIGHT OUT ACCESS C C c C C C ai 'C C C C C PROPOSED RETAIL GROSS SF 20&300 7eARCEL 3 3 0' ACR .................. C C C iqiLLLLLLLJ-C ....... ..... (I I.Jc I I Ia.1- I_JEL� C C TcTff I IT I ................... ................... I Frri rmrr, I-H*111 mb 150 ASSOCIATE PARKING SPACES (54) - op, BEHIND BUILDING .............. C I Icl C C C C C ~C ................... C C C C C . ....... . . ....... ...... ........ _ PARCEL 4 3.40 ACMES 9 C C C C m C C C C C C C ................. PARCEL 2 5,00 ACRES .............. C C C C C C N C C C C VACATED R/W .......... E::tb C C LJ C C C IcI, C 2-10'X 45'SALE —61-" 111 PALLET ENCLOSURES C C C -A C C C C c r _L 2.0.1 ACRE ..... - - --- -------------------------------------------------- -------------/----------------- IjCi Ui C C C 11 I.Lr) C C TrrTTI C, SEPTIC SYSTEM RHj*tiflAcc C Ns ORMWATER MANAGEMENT OUTLOT ST 1.08 ACRES AREA ......... 0.5 ACRES 1r) 36 -------------- -- --------------- r-= C=== --------------------- --------- ------------------------- 1614.49 PROPOSED RIGHT OI/RICHT OUT RELOCATE EX. ESPLANADE WIDE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY ACCESS WITH DECEL LANE GARNER LANE R/W R/W ...............................– ..................... ............... ................................. .................................................... ..................................................................... ...... ....................................................................... ......................................... "",...................._ "'-........–*...........—, ........... ESPLANADE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE AN APPROXIMATE 14' WIDENING;NEW CURB,GUTTER AND SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE. 889 STALLS IN FRONT AND ON AGRICULTURAL ZONING SETBACK------ RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITY POLES TO BEHIND THE NEW NORTH SIDE OF STORE PROVIDE A REQUIRES NO CUSTOMER ODORS AGRICULTURAL 20NING ON SOUTH SIDE OF SIDEWALK;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND ILLUMINATION. OR ROOFTOP HVAC EQUIPMENT 4.3 PARKING RATIO. ESPLANADE.206 SETBACK REWIRED FROM E5 100'NO SPRAY EASEMENT--- WITHIN 300'OF AGRICULTURAL AGRICULTURAL ZONING FOR COMMERCIAL USES, A ARE. (PER DEVELOPER COORDINATION ZONED (INCLUDING IW NO SPRAY EASEWEN7) WITH COUNI)) --------------------------------------------- ---—------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P F. IQ MSN 11/06/03 PROPOSED RETAIL w E.—R01— CONCEPT X HWY 99 AND GARNER LANE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN CC-2 AM L-M10121 S.E.SunnySide Road, T(503)659-95OO CHICO, CALIFORNIA WED 2003010.008.00 Suite 215 F(503)659-2227 auk—,.OR 97015 —U PMJID , ............. ................................I...... ..... ................ SITE DATA ACQUISITION PARCEL I = 6.00 AC PARCEL 2 = 5.00 AC PARCEL 3 - 3.03 AC PARCEL 4 - 3.40 AC PARCEL 5 = 2.04 AC GARNER LANE R/W = 0.55 AC TOTAL = 20.02 AC USE RETAIL PARCEL = 18.56 AC NEW GARNER LANE R/W 0.38AC .._.._....-`-......._..........._.. T _..' TOTAL 20.02 AC OUTLOT I = 1.08 AC _ o EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL BUILDING DATA HIGHW........_._ AY 99 PROPOSED RETAIL =208,300 SF _ PARKING DATA PROPOSED PARKING T STANDARD =863 STALLS ACCESSIBLE - 20 STALLS C010'ACT 136 STALLS RETAIL TOTAL =1039 STALLS GRAPHIC SCALE �`. - -�_- - PROPOSED PARKING RATIO =i0 PER 1,000 Si �-i�- - — .� _ 7 2003 NOTES: --- _ I. BRAWN WITHOUT BENEFIT OF SURVEY ♦ �mae-as n ♦ �- `\ �` U E 0 T T COON LEGEND FOR ♦♦ FENCED AREA ♦ � ,` PLANNING DIVISION PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS /• �� PROPOSED BUILDING / 6 BAY TLE ` +} L `\ �\ PROPOSED 18'CURB .; 6 AND DIFFER y a .: !:: ::•:: r�• ,,\ `\��\ ® PROPOSED PARKING SPACES `. GARNER LANE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE HEAW DUTY ASPHALTIC + 6 — 3 CONCIIEIE PAVEMENT W10FNPTG TO w';NEW WRB,GUTTER AND y 90EWALK ON WEST SIDE,• RELOCATION OF m ` ,,\ ` ,' HEAVY DUTY PARCEL — 8.00 ACRES c c c c \ ��EnsnNc UTILITY Fats TO BFNIND THE NEW ♦ \.,`,•�/// O11110NATUWT01lMWATER MANAGEMENT AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT ru STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTIC �\ CONCRETE PAVEMENT ♦ C C C C `\ o_t3D'TRUCE' I: TURN'ARdLIND C C C C � PROPOSED RIGHT IN/RICHT OUT ACCESS . �o•♦ .'.. PROPOSED RETAIL ` ` + cRoss s=2Ba313o f .F`%""7'ARCEL 3 ....3. ACRES = , __ _ � ;. C C C C C > C C C •. 150 ASSOCIATE ♦ - PARIONG SPACES BEHIND BUILDING i.?_ , C C C C p C C C C C ~C r ♦ �;\ — — PCI=L 4 3.40 Cit TEE C c c c P c c c c c c C �♦ ® PARCEL 2 — 5.00 ACRES c c c c c c c C C C c L ' ,\ �� VACATED R/W .......... r + f\ I 2-10'X 45'BALE .............. �rP PALLET ENCLOSURES PA 1 E� \ . ------------ ---------------- _ I /♦♦ _! A C/! C C C a C C C C IA C q�� �,\p.` `:•\ SEPTIC srstEM/ c c c c c c c c OUTLOT \ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT •:':+ f 5 + 1.08 ACRES AREA n 'ir36':Ci ?.vz:'- 1 I I I ♦ 0.5 ACRES ♦ f m O it LS `__ .. -- --L_- - :'.ST:�k.•�:.�.. 1614.49 :: : : . 41 PROPOSED RIGHT IN/RIGHT OUT RELOCATE EX. ESPLANADE '°'WIDE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY ACCESS WITH DECEL LANE GARNER LANE 4 R/W _�—_________-�_ _____________ _________—_______________ 6 }� /W 6 __ _ _ _ AGRICULTURAL ZONING SETBACK------- _ -- ESPLANADE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE AN APPROXIMATE 14' WIDENING NEW CURB.GUTTER AND SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE; 889 STALLS IN FRONT AND ON REQUITES NO CUSTOMER DOORS RELOCATION Of EXISTING UTILITY POLES TO BEiOND THE NEW NORTH SIDE Of SNORE PROVIDE A L AGRICULTURAL ZONING ON SOUTH SIDE Of ON ROOFTOP HVAC EQUIPMENT ESPLANADE.200'SETBACK REOUIRED FROM SIDEWALK;STORYWAIER MANAGEMENT AND ILLUMINATION. 4.3 PARgNC RAB0. 100'NO SPRAY EASEMENT WITHIN 300 OF AGRICULTURAL AGRICULTURAL ZONING FOR COMMERCIAL USES. - (PFA DEVELOPER COORDINATION ZONED AREA (INCLUDING 100'NO SPRAY EASEMENT) WITH COUNTY) __________________________________________________ ________________________ _ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i i 7-- —W., ,_ ..;... ,� ---�.x -..•-.,.,.. z -,- �Desl nea Ea-T L'?jssue�D�1e--x: �RevlSlon;Descn iron:_,,, e ,..- u e PROPOSED RETAIL DrDwn E9y AM o HWY 99 AND GARNER LANE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN CC-2 3 epeeeaeyY!emJD`"NOas 101215.E.SumrysWeRoad, 7(503)65}9500 CHICO, CALIFORNIA WED 20133010.00800 Stolle 215 F(503)659.2227 , Clackamas,OR 97015 —all PACIArD. .. ... SITE DATA ACQUISITION PARC0.1 = 6.00 AL PARCEL 2 = 5.00 AC PARCEL 3 - 3.03 AC PARCEL 4 - 140 AC PARCEL 5 - 2.04 AC GARNER LANE R/W = 0.55 AC TOTAL - 20.02 AC 115E RElA4 PARCEL 1856 AC ._..__ ..__. _.____.._._, _• NEW GARNER LANE R/W DJB AC W1LOT 1 1.08 AC ............_.__.._..._..... . .._...._......... DOSING TRAFFIC SIGNAL .._.___ •• TOTAL 20.02 AC -_.-_........_.._.__..._.._.._.......__...._. ....._-.-._..._ HIGHWAY BUILDING DATA 99 PROPOSED RETAIL =208,300 SF -...___......_._.__._.--_- PARKING DATA PROPOSED PARKING STANDARD -883 STALLS I - - 20 STALLS +rt,^^Y (nt V E U �`,` _.......__.. RETAIL TOTAL -1039 STALLS -__ D GRAPHIC SCALE ........................_._...• PROPOSED PARKING RATIO _ =SO PER 1,000 SF NOTES: ,/ - m,n-so rt ♦ '`__ \ NO Y 7 2003 i. DRAWN IMIHWT BENEFIT OF SURVEY ♦ --� _ LEGEND FOR : :..b:..a..:a...a.:.a...a �AE \* BUTTE COUNTY PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS PLANNING DIVISION PROPOSED BUILDING 6 BAY TLE PROPOSED IB CURB .:�.:�::• s :,� AND GUTTER •• 2 `\ PROPOSED PARKING SPACES GARNER LANE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE HEAVY DULY ASPHALTIC 6 _ 3 ,\ �\ WIDENING TO 40';NEW CURB,GUTTER AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT a SIDEWALK ON NEST SIDE:RELOCATION OF LAY+ A _ C t•t!!�� c�L t'. C Cl , C ~ C ♦ ,`\ �` FASORI;winiTi►UES TO BMOiD 711E NEW n, PARCEL , V.1JV'AC.i-Ic0 \ / HEAVY DUTY ♦/' .::'•'^ ' ::• + C C C C ILLUMINATION.TOANWATEA MANAGEMENT AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT / �- �.:.::•::: 3 ` f• \ , STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTIC • « CONCRETE PAVEMENT f3Q;TRUCK TURN AROUND /� K i C C C C C C PROPOSED RIGHT IN/RIGIT OUT ACCESS PROPOSED RETAIL ` ` f` ` GROSS SF_208.300 f 'AFZCEL 3 3.U', ACHES ` ' —. c c c c c c c c 150 ASSOCIATE 4a PARKING SPACES BEHING BUILDING C C C C C C C C C ~C r. `Cic-4-1 C C ?::;::': ` ' - PARCEL 4 " 3.40 AC?rES ♦� c c c c P c c c c C c "Ic p PARCEL 2 - 5.00 ACHES . TCT c c c c c c c c c ♦' , VACATED R/W C C C C C C C C , C 2-10'%45'BALE/ 61' 61' Tz• .............. CH PALLET ENCLOSURES )?A L t� E� \ .............. $` i�i'`�'��'� E C C C C C C � C C c�wsEPRC SYSTEM/ ; : o c c c c c c c c OUTLOT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT , 5 / I I I 1.08 ACRES (• \ AREA .:::•36 , ' i t ' \•� �,;\ 45 ACRES :.:.....:. 36f:: 3 --s-------- -------'---- - iiTiF:'r'?: -- ------------ - O --------------------- --- ---------------------- -- - --------------------------��-.---L.---^�--- -�_-------- ------- ......_ 1614.19 - 41 q PROPOSED RIGHT OL/I6GLT OUT RELOCATE >� ESPLANADE ID'MADE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY ACCESS WITH DECEL LANE GARNER LANE 6 R/W R _______—___—_ _—______—_____ __-—___—____ r, ......-_.___...__._......__.......__.._._.-__....___.._......__.__._......_.._..._.__._______._._._...___._._....__..___..__..._.._......_._._.._....._..._._._.__._._.._.-.__......_..__.___.__._.__.... ..._.___.__.__......_.__.._...__..._._.__...__....____.._.......___.__....-_...._._.......__...._.....__..._......__.__........_._..._...,__,_._.............._.._....._.__......._.._._...__..-_...._......_....__....-_..._._.___..._._._........_...._....__._......... _..........___...._...._............_._..._._._.._....._._.__..._ _---__—__—__—__—_---_— —__--_—_••—__ —__-------_ ESPLANADE IMPROVEMENTS 1N--AN APPROgMA1F 14' CLUDE WIDENING:NEW CURB.GUTTER AND SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE: 889 STALLS IN FRONT AND ON AGRICULTURAL ZONING SETBACK------ RELOCATION OF DUSTING UTILITY POLES TO BEHIND THE NEW NORTH SIDE OF STORE PROVIDE A REOUINES NO CUSTOMER OOORS AGRICULTURAL ZONING ON SOUTH SIDE OF SIDEWALK;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND ILLUMINATION. 4.3 PARKING RANO. OR ROOFTOP HVAC EGAPMENT ESPLANADE.20O SETBACK REOUIRED FROM 100'NO SPRAY EASEMENT WITHIN JOO OF AGRICULTURAL AGRICULTURAL ZONING FOR COMMERCIAL USES (PER DEVELOPER COORDINATION ZONED AREA. (OLCWDING IDV AD SPRAY EASEMENT) A, WITH COUNTY) y�L i No,; Date, B' Revision Descn i1e� ` ' ENE ed Ety L Issue.°ateI �:.as1�,�� �„�.is�:a.e� - MSN 11/06/03 PROPOSED RETAIL JI2M CONCEPT �,off, , HWY 99 AND GARNER LANE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN CC-2 i 3 - >'BYPmjesNo ,; CHICO, CALIFORNIA 101215.E Sunnyside Road, T(503)659A500 . 9 MED 2003010.008.00 Suite 215 F(503)659-2227 Oad,aITw,OR 97015 -11 PAd—.— ' SITE DATA ACQUISITION PARCEL I = 6.00 AC PARCEL 2 = 5.00 AC U PATINA 3 - J.0IT AC 4 - 3. ` PARCEL 40 AC D GARNER 5 2.04 Ac GARNER LANE R/W = 0.55 AL TOTAL 20.02 AC USE ..... ...__ ._..._ ....._......_..__..._..... �` RETAIL PARCEL 18.56 AC Al O\I 7 2003 NEW GARNER LANE R/W 0.313 AC ; 1y T� OUILOT 1 1.08 AC -_.._.._............... . . TOTAL 20.02 AC ... o EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL .__...._-_....... h 0 HIGHWAY,gg — .. BUILDING 2013.300 SF . . . _ .. RERETAILATA ......................._.....__..............__...._.__._..._...._...._._.__ _._... _.- BUTTE COUNTY PROPOSED NN NG DIVISION PARKING DATA PROPOSED PARKING I STANDARD =883 STALLS ACCESSIBLE - 20 STALLS COMPACT - 136 STALLS _ RETAIL TOTAL 1039 STALLS • --� -_ PROPOSED PARKING RATIO -5.0 PER 1,000 SF i GRAPHIC SCALE --'Ap! 1 - _ NOTES: I. DRAWN WITHOUT BENEFIT OF SURVEY I I \ --� FOR _ LEGEND R / PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ';5ya�.:a}}::a!�:bi:i:a.:ibiii: FENCED AREA N 5 ail PROPOSED BlBIGNC ♦/', 6 BAY TIE PROPOSED IB'CURB AND GUTTER ...... y as ;;�j•;gr i:i 7�• `\ `\�w\ PROPOSED PARKING SPACES 9 GARNER LANE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT + 6 1 + ,\ `" ,\ CONCRETE PAVEMENT WIDENING TO 40';NEW CURB,GUTTER AND •► g 4 � SIDEWALK ON WEST SIDE;RELOCATION OF PARCEL ; - 6.00 ACHES c c c c „� .\� EXOSTINC UTILITY PGES TO BINWD 7HE HEW SII.;STORMWAIFR MANAGEMENT AND HEAVY Duir ....... ` CONCRETE PAVEMENT '• C C C C ILLUMINATION. *`' STANDARD Dun ASPHALTIC /... } fA ♦ ' V C C C C ,\ CONCRETE PAVEMENT LUJ FM ou $ I I I Fcl I I9 '/♦ a TURN AROUND ., I PROPOSED RIGHT IN/RIGHT OUT ACCESS . .1 . 4 /' - C C C t��C C b�' PROPOSED RETAIL ` + ': ° ) / ;c 7eARCEL 3 3.0:, ACRES j ♦ ___.��/,' „-+w._--^ GROSS SF=208,300 \. C C C twC *Cc 4CC 150 ASSOCIATE ♦ - -'"`„ -,,,._„-„ ! 49 _ PARIONG SPACES ... BEHIND BUILDINGi:vy• '? .wi~ C C C Cm C C C C C +C ♦ \ \\ / u ??.......... 9 " - PARCEL 4 .... 3.40 AC-,cS 16u ute 4 C C C C 111 P C C C Cl I C C C O O PARCEL 2 - 5.00 ACRES C c c c c c c c c c c ♦ I — + \ , ` ♦ VACATED R/W i ' 2-10'K 45'BALE/ 61' U '61' g i' E C C C c C C C C y f A �L ` t?.t} ACRIw� \ . .............. .............. PALLET ENCLOSURES .............. ------------------------------------------------ __ + .............. F.F:57 ` tt 11 I 4' SEPTIC SYSTEM/ e c c c c c c c c OUTLOT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT , 5 + 1.08 ACRES AREA 0.5 ACRES m O ,4 --- ---- � ------------ _ ------------------ -- - L-------------------------- ------------ 164.49 - ---t---�� --- PROPOSED RIGHT IN/RIGHI OUT RELOCATE EK. < ESPLANADE IO'WIDE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY ACCESS WITH DECEL LANE GARNER LANE 4 R/W ------------------------- ------- ------------ ------------- -------------------------- ESPLANADE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE AN APPROXIMATE 14' AGRICULTURAL ZONING SETBACK r XROLATION OF EXISTIENING,NEW CURB.NG GUTTERAND fl70 BEHIND THALK ON E NEW NBGLIHTSIDE OF FRONTALLS IN RE PROVIDE A Ls _ OR ROOFTES OP HVAC CUSTOMER DOORS AGRICULTURAL ZONING ON SOUTH SIDE OF SIDEWALK;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND ILLUMINATION. 4.3 PARKING RATIO. i g 100'NO SPRAY EASEMENT---- NATION 300'OF AGRICULTINRAL ESPLANADE.200'SETBACK REQUIRED FROM U ZONED AREA (PER DEVELOPER COORDINATION AGRICULTURAL ZONING FOR COMMERCIAL USES. (ONCLLDA'G 100'NO SPRAY EASEMENT) WITH COUNTY) . -------------------------------------------------- ______ ___ _______ + IJo x Date; B x r;� "Si � Dest ned 8 Issue OAte+ $ 2_ Revlslon Descn tion< r IT y MSN 11/06/03 PROPOSED RETAIL a DiaWn�By �,' CONCEPT - , HWY 99 AND GARNER LANE _ CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN CC-2 , cneckea By.+ ` Pro1ec1 No,y s 10121 S.E.Sunnyside ROM, T(503)659-9500 CHICO, CALIFORNIA WED 200JO10.00.00 suite 215 F(503)659.2227 Clackamas,OR 97015 D-Mll PACU--- ' Inter-Departmental Memorandum To: Stephen Betts, Senior Planner From: Ted Crawford, Fire Department Subject: Pre-development review for a pre-development meeting for retail store in North Chico Date: December 10, 2003 fi 1 Based on the information furnished for the pre-development meeting on the new proposed retail shopping area in north Chico at Garner and Esplanade, the following would be the minimum requirements: a 1. Meet the Uniform Fire Code for access and water requirements for fire protection. This will require a pressurized water system in an area that currently does not have a water system. These requirements may change as a result of any additional information regarding this project. I will be available for the meeting on December 12, 2003. If there are any questions please contact me at 538-7994. CC: B. Redding Chrono File EOuE WE D EC 1 1 2003 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION 1 k ;a ne vont LAND OF NATURAL W E A L T H AND BEAUTY '{ y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE; (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 November 20, 2003 Subj: Pre-Development Conference To Whom It May.Concern: The Butte County Development Services Department has received a request for a pre- development conference regarding a proposed 208,300 square foot retail store. The retail store use requires approval of a Use Permit. The proposed retail store project would consist of the following elements: • A 208,300 square foot retail store with general merchandise, pharmacy, grocery, minor auto service, and garden supplies • 1,039 parking stalls • Access to the proposed store would be from both Esplanade and Garner Lane • Realignment of the existing Esplanade/Garner Lane intersection • Widening of Esplanade and Garner Lane, installation of curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and the relocation of existing utility poles Please refer to the attached Conceptual Site Plan provided by the applicant for additional information on the proposed project. The application indicates that sewage disposal would be handled by an on-site septic system(s) and domestic water supplied via a public water system. The project site is located on the*northeast corner of Esplanade and Garner Lane, Chico. The project site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and has a General Plan land use designation of Commercial. The purpose of the pre-development conference meeting is to inform the applicant of local or state requirements that may apply to their project. This allows the applicant to incorporate those requirements into the design of the project when the actual project application is submitted. The pre-development conference will be held in the conference room located at 3-A County Center Drive (Butte County General Services), Oroville, on Friday, December 12, 2003, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. If your department or agency has concerns or comments regarding the proposal, please have someone attend or submit written comments to this department prior to the meeting. Comments may be faxed to (530) 538-7785, attention Stephen Betts. If you have any questions, please contact me at (530) 538-7153, or via e-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner Enclosures cc: Butte County Environmental Health Division Butte County Local Agency Formation Commission Butte County Agricultural Commissioner Butte County Public Works Department Butte County Agricultural Commissioner Butte County Fire Department/CDF Butte County Air Quality Management District City of Chico, Planning Department California Department of Fish and Game California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 5 (Redding Office) Caltrans District 3 Shell MacPherson, PACLAND Jeff Farrar, Main&Main Investments, LLC v i _ ... . - .. u tteou y LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 November 20, 2003 Subj: Pre-Development Conference To Whom It May Concern: The Butte County Development Services Department has received a request for a pre- development conference regarding a proposed 208,300 square foot retail store. The retail store use requires approval of a Use Permit. The proposed retail store project would consist of the following elements: • A 208,300 square foot retail store with general merchandise, pharmacy, grocery, minor auto service, and garden supplies • 1,039 parking stalls • Access to the proposed store would be from both Esplanade and Garner Lane • Realignment of the existing Esplanade/Garner--ane intersection • Widening of Esplanade and Garner Lane, installation of curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and the relocation of existing utility poles Please refer to the attached Conceptual Site Plan prov_ded by the applicant for additional information on the proposed project. The application indicates that sewage disposal would be handled by an on-site septic system(s) and domestic water supplied via a public water system. The project site is located on the'northeast corner of Esplanade and Garner Lane, Chico. The project site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial), and has a General Plan land use designation of Commercial. The purpose of the pre-development conference meeting is to inform the applicant of local or state requirements that may apply to their project. This allows the applicant to incorporate those requirements into the design of the project when the actual project application is submitted. r The pre-development conference will be held in the conference room located at 3-A County Center Drive (Butte County General Services), Oroville, on Friday, December 12, 2003, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. If your department or agency has concerns or comments regarding the proposal, please have someone attend or submit written comments to this department prior to the meeting. Comments maybe faxed to (530) 538-7785, attention Stephen Betts. If you have any questions, please contact me at (530) 538-7153, or via e-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner Enclosures cc: Butte County Environmental Health Division Butte County Local Agency Formation Commission Butte County Agricultural Commissioner Butte.County Public Works Department Butte County Agricultural Commissioner Butte County Fire Department/CDF Butte County Air Quality Management District City of Chico,Planning Department California Department of Fish and Game California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 5 (Redding Office) Caltrans District 3 Shell MacPherson, PACLAND Jeff Farrar, Main&Main Investments, LLC , STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,Govemor DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES 1416 NINTH STREET,P.O.BOX 942836 SACRAMENTO,CA 94236-0001 (916)653-5791 DEC 17 200 - Mr. Stephen Betts Butte County Planning Division COUNTY 7 County Center Drive DEC 11 2003 Oroville, California 95965-3397 DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Betts: SERVICES The Department of Water Resources has completed its review of the preliminary information provided by the county regarding the proposed development by North American Guan Yin Pu Sa Inc. located near Lake Oroville in Butte County. The applicant proposes to develop a residential resort on approximately 411 acres adjacent to the eastern bank of Lake Oroville on the North Fork Feather River arm. The project includes home sites, a golf course, shopping center, restaurants and various other associated amenities. This residential resort project has the potential to significantly impact the water quality of Lake Oroville during and after construction. Lake Oroville is the largest reservoir of the California State Water Project and provides water to agencies around and downstream of it. Best management practices should be strictly adhered to during the construction phase to prevent water quality impacts to the Lake. In addition, this project should be designed to avoid any direct discharge of wastewater or surface runoff into Lake Oroville, treated or otherwise. During the early stages of this proposal, North American Guan Yin Pu Sa Inc. should identify.proposed methods for the collection, treatment, and disposal of wastewater and surface runoff from this project. have included a copy of our Property Management Map No. 04-24 depicting DWR's right of way in this area. Any encroachment on DWR right of way requires an encroachment permit and an electronic copy of the application and more detailed information regarding DWR encroachment permits can be found on our website at www.dlrw.water.ca.gov or by contacting Cliff Winston, Senior Land Agent at(916) 653-5361. Please inform.the applicant of this information and advise them that all future documents relating to the development of this project should be directed to DWR for review and comment. If you have any questions I may be contacted by e-mail at arogers('d_)water.ca.gov or by telephone at (916) 657-4400. Sincerely, Alesia S. Rogers Right of Way Agent Enclosure