HomeMy WebLinkAboutPRED 07-0005_PLANNING it
SEPARATOR SHEET
a,„ 0140 iso --os i
PROJECT NUMBER y�ecDo� - ooas
PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET
FILE NO.: PRED07-0005
PROJECT TYPE: PREDEVELOPMENT REVIEW
APN: 040-180-051
APPLICANT: LORENZ, GERALD
ADDRESS: 9456 JONES AVENUE, DURHAM, CA, 95938
PHONE:
OWNER: LORENZ, GERALD
ADDRESS: 9456 JONES AVENUE, DURHAM, CA, 95938
REPRESENTATIVE: NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING
ADDRESS: 111 Mission Ranch Blvd. Ste. 100, Chico, CA 95926
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: On-Hold by Applicant. Pre-development conference for proposal
to subdivide a 5 acre lot into four parcels on Jones Avenue. The property is adjacent to the north
Durham green line and OFC-designated land that appears to be in active agricultural operation,
according to the application. 300' ag buffer applies. The 5 acres property is just 292' wide. The
ag buffer would need to be substantially reduced or waived entirely in order to approve the map.
Staff did not find any unusual circumstances to support the reduction or waiver of the ag buffer.
LOCATED: 9456 Jones Ave., Durham, CA 95938
PROPERTY ZONED: SR-1 (Suburban Residential, one-acre parcels)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: AR(Agricultural—Residential)
TOWN/AREA: Durham
1. Application accepted: 7/11/2007
Amount: $1,766.20
Receipt#: P570
2. Assigned To: Steve Troester
3. Conference Room reserved:
4. Date and Time of Conference:
5. Pre-Development Letter sent to applicant and agencies:
6. Comments sent to: IDR,
7. Comments received from:
8. Staff Report: Project Video:
9. Follow-up letter sent to applicant:
K://planning/projects/a new filel/pred summary sheet
Revised 11/01/05
Butte County Department Development Services u
a� TrFo
TIM SNELLINGS,DIRECTOR PETE CALARCO,ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
7 County Center Drive o 0
Oroville,CA 95965 0 0
(530)538-7601 Telephone o o
(530)538-7785 Facsimile �► .�
OV Nt
APPLICANT'S NAME: (If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required.) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:
L�6=re'4 ,L. 0
ADDRESS: STREET;CITY,STATE,&ZIP CODE TELEPHONE:
`?5'S l6- �o•JE5 .4✓� . cJn-HA , . G� g'.5938 ( ) s- 3x/77
E-MAIL: / FAX:
A ( ) -
OWNER'S NAME: TELEPHONE:
ADDRESS: STREET,CITY,STATE,&ZIP CODE:
Yia.- _ .t. �41i i "�`�^�-1 D' N�4+�' d>.S+T.ti RRON9,
UN NUN "tv
NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT(if any) SITE SIZE(in-square feet or acres)
LOCATION OF PROJECT(major cross streets and address,if any)
4 ,E. vLAIL,1t� : C-4 9Sg38
ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE PROPOSED LAND USE
s)Z-! 1 1417- s.�vr-�r��� A4s1DiEJr,4Z-_
EXISTING STRUCTURES(square feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES(square feet) UNDER WILLIAMSON ACT CONTRACT
l0 3ct�fl .¢ ❑Yes �,No
(Chec One) (Check One)
❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER
PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ® PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER
❑ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
❑LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
❑USE PERMIT ❑WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP
❑MINOR USE PERMITBUTTE ❑CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
F-1COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY UNMUP COUNTY ❑REZONE
❑VARIANCE JUL Tu��1 1 "3) ElGENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
❑MINOR VARIANCE ❑MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN
F1 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT DEVELOPIVI!`•' Y
SERVICES ❑DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
❑CERTIFICATE OF MERGER R OTHER.P2E— I ISO ll ✓GL b{�'1 %
90-
�9�i{�$e �aNAMM�rsT'xaN. 60E, are- Nt>t.�.-._" 3'S:m Z' <Id' AN, �}
WE
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT(Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division,describe the number and size
of parcels.).
.3 4.427a ey 6.✓�
I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY.
FURTHER,I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
ACCURATE. (If an agent is tobeauthorized,execute an affidavit of authorizatio and inc a the affidavit with this application.)
(DATE:"1 7- 10 - o7 SIGNATURE: AeIZAU
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
To Butte County,Department of Development Services:
,AIOA7-1i S 7-,4 A—
Print Name of Agent Phone Number
Mailing Address
is hereby authorized to process this application on my/our property, identified as Butte County Assessors Parcel Number(s)
This authorization.allows representation for all applications,hearings,appeals,etc. and to sign all documents necessary for
said processing,but not including document(s)relating to record title interest.
Owner(s)of Record(sign and print name)
Print NATe Print
G
Signature Signature,
Print Name Print Name
Signature Signature
Print Name of Applicant(if other than owner) Signature of Applicant(if other than owner)
X"-= 59077 (S,l 373 -1600
Print Name of California Civil Engineer/Land Surveyor Phone Number
l l I Mt�Slo,�.1 [�.�-[�' 13L✓��. �u�Ti_ loo �/f�co � X5-926 ,i/o.2�.�siAi�-•�l6.c�A,r
Mailing Address Email Address
BUTTE
COUNTY
JUL 12007
DE SERVIC SNT
Butte County Department of Development Services vTt
TIM SNELLINGS,DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO,ASSISTANT DIRECTOR o F°
0 0
7 County Center Drive o 0
Oroville,CA 95965 0 - .. o
(530)538-7601 Telephone ° °
(530)538-7785 Facsimile
PROJECT SETTING DESCRIPTION INSTRUCTIONS
Applicant Name: Z�� L.o�ZG,.1Z Project Number:
Please address the following on a separate sheet of paper:
I.� Identify any applicable proposed development schedule, including anticipated, incremental, or phased
development and all associate projects.
2.� List and describe any other related permits and other-public approvals required for this project, including
those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies.
3f Describe the site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability,
plants, animals, and any cultural,historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and
the use of the structures.
4. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants, animals and any cultural,
historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use.
(one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage,
set-back,rear yard,etc.).
5.. Include any special studies prepared for the project site including, but not limited to traffic, biology,
wetlands delineation,archaeology,etc.
C'O'UNTY
31JIL 12001
DEVE :OC SNT
SE
Butte County Department of Development Services o g10T rF0
TIM SNELLINGS,DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO,ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
0 0
7 County Center DriveBUTTE 00 = o
Oroville,CA 95965 FPCOUNTY
(530)538-7601 Telephone C
(530)538-7785 Facsimile JUL i 12007 OV NZ
DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
PRE-DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE
INFORMATIONAL SHEET
Applicant Name: c-0 Project Number: 1'L6po-0005
The Pre-Development Conference is a chance to meet with county staff prior to formally submitting
a development application. After receiving a complete application packet, the Department of
Development Services will schedule a pre-development, inter-departmental review meeting that
includes the applicant and/or applicant's representative and representatives from the Development
Services Department, Environmental Health Division, Public Works Department, County Fire
Department,and any other agency with applicable interest in the proposed development site. The
purpose of the meeting is to inform:the applicant of local,state and/or federal requirements that may
apply to their project. This allows the applicant an advanced opportunity to incorporate those
requirements into the design of the project.
Any direction given shall be preliminary and is subject to further refinement or change as the
application progresses through the formal application process. Following the meeting, the
Department of Development Services shall send a letter to the applicant summarizing what was
discussed, including any additional filing requirements for the formal application.
Please submit the following in preparation for the conference:
• A completed, signed Project Information Form.
A detailed Project Setting Description(instructions attached).
• . Twenty(20)copies of a conceptual site plan.
• Payment of the currently required fee may be made by check payable to "Butte County
Treasurer". The Public Fee Schedule is available under"Fees" at:
http://www.buttecouniy.nest/dds/Planning/.
Detailed information submitted at this stage will help the Department of Development Services staff
better evaluate your project.
The Pre-Development Conference is held in the Development Services Department Conference
Room A, located at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville and will be scheduled upon receipt of your
complete application packet. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at
(530)538-7601.
K:\P1anning\F0RMS\APPLICATI0NS\PreDevelopmentConference.doc
APN: 040-180-051
PROJECT SETTING DESCRIPTION
SUPPLEMENT TO PRE-DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
7/6/07
1. The only applicable proposed development schedule would be the approved parcel
map of 24 months. Other than that, no schedule exists.
2. This project abuts.the Green Line, and therefore, would require a reduction in the 300'
setback in order to develop additional lots.
3. The 5 plus/minus acre site is used for residential purposes only. As it exists today, the
home site sits in the southwest corner of the property and covers approximately 37,000 sf.
Generally speaking, the land is without any major sloping and the soil conditions are
typical of the Durham area of=Jones Avenue. Plants and animals are indigenous to the
area and no known cultural, historical or scenic aspects are known to exist.
4. The property that abuts the project site to the north is zoned: A-10 with an OFC
general plan designation. There is home site in the southwest corner of said parcel and
the parcel appears to be in full agricultural production. The properties to the east of APN
040-180-051 are zoned: PUD with an AR general plan designation. Those properties are
all part of the Durham Green PUD. The property to the south is zoned: SR-1 with an AR
general plan designation. The home site on the property roughly occupies the westerly
one third of the parcel. To the west of Mr. Lorenz' property lies a parcel that is zoned:
A-5 with an AR general plan designation. The parcel appears to be in full agricultural
production with a home site south and west of the subject parcel.
5. No special studies have been prepared for the project site.
BUTTE
COUNTY
JUL
DE SRC S T
E
e�V T TF B ,TE COUNTY RECEIP I Printed: 7/11/2007
° 7 County Center Drive 11:36 am
° ° Oroville, CA 95965
o e
e e
e o
Receipt Number: P570
Permit Number: PRED07-0005
Job Address: 9456 JONES AVE9456 JONES AVE
Applicant: LORENZ, GERALD
Fee Description Account Number Fee Amount
EH Pre-Development Meeting
0010-540003-4614901-1010 $147.10
DPAG Pre-Application Meeting
0010-460001-4612200-1010 $32.50
DPFPP Pre-Application Meeting
0100-450001-4617240-1010 $102.70
DPLDMF Pre-Application Meeting
0010-440004-4611700-1010 $371.90
DP Pre-Application Meeting
0010-440001-4210900-1010 $1,112.00 ✓
Total Fees Paid: $19766.20
Date Paid: 7/11/2007
Paid By: LORENZ, GERALD
Pay Method: Check 4927
Received By: MEM
PROJECT COORDINATION FORM,
DATE of IDR: December 12,2007 PLANNER: Steve Troester
PROJ. NAME: Lorenz, Gerald PROJ. NUMBER: PRED07-0005
TYPE: Pre-Development APN: 040-180-051
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS READY FOR HEARING?
PLANNING
L sw Ute'ki iE� I/�t v�✓� f�/:Z.�G..t�a_..j /l•.� ..•-P-�. � �.i.'. /� � 5-
CC.n
PUBLIC WORKS
e
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
ar
Fie f �. �. }
1f
COUNTY COUNSEL
AG.
BUILDING
ASSESSOR
FIRE
G:\ADM[N[STRATION\IDR Agenda\2007 IDR Agendas\PROJECT COORDINATION FORM.doc
r'l0 kan•r•1 12's 4,
7d
OFc wa,>to•n.7
23
fano]A.vrr a»-:....,...
/r f "`.-1..1 r f �`.J •may'' - I�. OumAMMIS'm+_
QFC � .QJ �_ w � r , . ► z �._ __- -
Lorenz -'. `
. . A o 180-051
A5 t
PUD
- �, Cooper TPS
Jones Ave '
r _ .
�y
_ ! I
67
- Durham-Dayton Hwy
17
IL
C - Existing Horses
Page 1 of 2
Troester, Steve
From: John Hanley Uhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 8:55 AM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: RE: Lorenz PDR
Steve,
Thanks for your diligence as well. I did learn something from Rob: Falling inside the 300' buffer is different that
abutting said buffer. Inside means encroachment and anybody in the surveying business understands the
ramifications of encroachment. Having said all that let me wish you and yours a very Merry Christmas and a
Happy and Prosperous New Year.
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
From: Troester, Steve [mailto:Stroester@buttecounty.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 7:47 AM
To: John Hanley
Cc: Jolliffe, Stacey
Subject: RE: Lorenz PDR
John,
If this project were not located in an area where the 300' buffer applied and all other conditions/factors remained
as in this location, it is safe to say that staff would probably be able to recommend approval, as long as other
unforeseen issues did not arise.
Thanks for all of your diligent work on behalf of your client.
Steve
From: John Hanley [mailto:jhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 4:23 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: Lorenz PDR
Steve,
Would it be safe to say that staff would have supported this project if it were not for the 300' agricultural buffer?
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
12/19/2007
RAACC q-Q 12,%V
OIC DlOtflt3•tr:f
Or A
f ,:J L Tr—
syr � , moi- y�• � vim, �.�+ 4 +�a{ ���� ,w.
•• J'+i� ��,� 'M Vit,;�'F'.•.,,Nc-moi' '� ✓T.r:'�a..' `n•+�"•':�. f � r! • ew 'A
OF
IA-1 0 '� +S_• .tea' • [,�.�.Y+�- 3 _"� �rr+'r w •:d� � ��.+�•• ' _ f.� �,
Lorenz lb
282'
?- - AR0 ,,185-05
s Ly7 _•a - • •`9f 4L
41
746
- a t
r
a �
180-45 206
-� Jones Ave TV Cooper TPM •f j ''' � .
Dt•r - it r �` •
A ' `� � i ilk Wit!
IL
Durham Dayton HOt wy
r �\ �-_�__ _�. _rr�"' .J SyJ '1 ;.5�. ` ` i �� ^•1 tib • ,y +,r� 4,t a+�� ;� `��, �Y�
C3 = Existing Homes
3 ry QSbSb 'dIDWVH�kna .,z
'9 "`E02
= a o — -fes/ � � aS
5 1 SO 0Q I—0�O :Nd V idi` = a
KIN
d L SN'd�� 1N3W�l�OZIdW l �d'd�SQN'd'1 eta _ a
p#�a aaaaa
E °t
O m m � � � Y V•
� °9 $� m n=� �'• � $ s T Elm 6 �m� 6� O � � O
m �9$m$ ob jig m �;_E b�= °; °$mm Sao o a. 0
3pb '_agg$mx", R b'$
°$Jio�° ' km� p3�Ctm mo $$ $ o�a�
a� am y« s $�S mmommYz- b °
o $; UPMRE o$ $'mma� �$ ° a°oma m °° g$F m C
ma � $�'`�"cni�m$m•E'` �=o ��"mom m �°�°' SLE °�,m�m° m�"o- �°� m m �
a�E sa$im o. m$ SS3oR
am m Z ya $
maoP
$
AN
$ 8Y $° dao smOm- 2m=m2 -g 1 a�° a S__„-�m P N
ms° G1 ° m` - _
d-8# CT «mm� o f ;m gm� 0a3 YamN&°m_- S "pbmaa ry$�- J f0
�m3 N � s �T �mi � aSa$ ma $a_ aa$$ aab�s ;aim$
_ $ jLe _ S., _
�ss "'!� S •`! �� �m a �0� oU6��0 �ma0� �� ��mE6::a�VO�'-^y ���oF
i.
3 g S °
�p�i$ �noEco a�b $ a« �u$-•m
J�4°4 Z4 �algy �a( $ �p6 _ asoao�Ja`opp�$v m$� '0a -
�s°1 �� �hX <1J }�a Ua�� �mOl osis 6r Om1a�c`9.� mE _° 01 �J� mC m tgcc
t S�$a° °oaap P om Fll
nxrsgm $a°ys "m 9 $ mB3 gm Lag
$g !S m ' Cuoi o`oaa;°vQQg gyoo=mrysm_v$
$
o fibm 030'a
a - mlLz -'
E
N � iLLgm� Em9koL �- ofJ S a6r mau
amJ -o
m
S
amJ ..nn
V,
Io
I I I
I I I I
CD / O
10 to
to
I I M I
m l o I _
N T —
ami / N04'17'00'W
_ _ _-- ---292'------ -_
Ul WO I I
Iz� 1
amV "r'n
J
I r I
Q
292'-` --------� rn /�i
rn - ---
wo
a ps MW
W, I I
ir� I OQC ooNu-
U
Who
1 I
� n I ' I
I
oDoo
ZWN _ --,
I I O
CN 0 0 I zIx
1 rmaa I I I ``NWrn
O z raw I�
Qa I
i �Ro �a� I I I
O in Q I M d I
I—
WFw os e I
� 1N
opz >
m "L----29r------
� i I
I I II Wo p 1
1
II �N�
ON N
Q: ' L.
Ut I
I
Jna jcmaw c i I
�v 1 m y
I
� I
291.65' ,3nN3nd-
N06.34'3 "W _ _ T — — —
I
N I a
w
I
Zc v 1 a
o I ui cc ui +1 co I o Z
o I O c +4 O
I c vi o
� 4
o �
X-;7
ICU ,1 .7777
l
-4?V
)-fi d f y� A
va
s
e�
Ali
oiC 040.11 ON
ago.tC3431
*al '
s � �- •►`_�1� [._^''• r ���`,^'. is r �- 'v7^'.1� +, .�"• �'�! ."�.�a'1 �� ". �iI�`l �•twws0•'mliat+ _�—..
� � ..rte w.-�may'. � ♦` �.� • �W^'`". _ --__ -
jv
-,30 41. i..e-
IA-1 0d -> , 14lie�o re r1 z -- .,j; A�
- �� • �
C} �;� o o 282 ,► �r 4 10t
AR t µ•- -
fir-
PUD
Cooper TPM ` ,;
Jones Ave ,• - ►y'
lilt r
* !kip
*ski
A
.erv`�F, ��' a.�_-= .as � �� S`' 7 .�. �'J. �x,91� .•J
r - Durham-Dayton Hwy
i # 7.� � 'fl ��1it...rr�Y r.+e+r• _ i '�.y- r H � + T�,.�= ,t •'v w•', S 1 f�j 4t.��[ # � �i}a rr;� �. .;'�_*�,r j �. � •
f ,� =---_ - �,�=.�.ra,r«wn•�—` — � ' i - ` �' � � i �+ 1 Y ?J '��, i•.��' '�1 �4�-• ` ; Off•
r : , �s � 4 i 1•Z�
= Existing Homes
>� z
3 e a ISO-0(21 1-O-b0 'Nd'd gc
Edi W
a SNd'1d 1N3W�/�Oz1dW l �d'd�SQN'd� �t�l _ a
o _.. ccryQe A b�7 O `fig k
= J ZI � N0 I �9I I ; �� V �i� / W
E r
6
a� u�
a
$ m" m°
�b$bFo $- Y mE ac v mFm;m ao Y� 'a o
« ga$mmm $NIbL
sW mai as m 05 �y m �.
$� b -.
� m2s=$- 1., 0« m w N
« 12
o ° a 0Yz_ `o O1
WW 'o mam `02g« 3mE ONO >mm� m$' �m 3 '°o °- °-mm � 8$�'emm a,
�„p Ct 6 m
and m
11
�mm8 °IL
$�
3 0« $o�Z$«€3 °_°�°off mo�as � 8 =ai ivaame 0-.sit Ei h ° mo Dm-mm°� °b3 -Oa s_m&m p N
ga# 8 2o$�� � .F° E"y°D' as-� $tL IL
°o a > s F a mi;-4c mm- a= 3mm . i�es m-" "a
� _� a n� o �d-# � m��°o3,��im� "� Ja 33fia�°•m>_~$°o.��� a ry�mp.�mJ 0
IQ
IL $�# o a :a
:5,
°oaaov°°$+�«R
§ �m- mmm E-a Za OCL-m o m a
D_W 0.�. �cB�2ELC S_ mJJ cG �k Ol �i 9 0
awyo
m� mo° mda- U o- 33'E
>� a-°a�ma� a� «aaba�
3 } lsg n «_� ��$-h �• n$«Y�a� �2«; SQ°m as o 0
S m �—NN2! (Y�"QL gVO2E m $ 1 O
ria m �I N i 3 E�--- �- a_
o a44 m SS m oa�b3�
01
_ HE
m
8F c Z s b ° m$� 'baaamm` - a '$
J �o bY� 0 «aa« ,4 mE8' «Rm—b'a' "�+«pE
W b ° ,S _ -
""
a �mm v �m
y J� _ ioP 3mo�i`Sso � om° a.I a m
w a� � z n s ;_abm $= _ $ $ri-� oo ^ag
dSo2U ° �O NN 0— — a �� a VO —V Q, t R V N
t'L a - �3 a="y"J! -g °ago 0O 0'm a
m m bl E �r-$ .Y @za2 LL�m_"aaYo"�Ea,ia�s`` Q a9ic$�F�«mmaoa�Sa°aomio1 I 9
N Z QmU rP (VPNV
_ riro c ui o r v g = S
QmU <M%) ..nn
D V1
I p
0 / o I
s I
/ s o
I1 pq
EO // co
to
m l I I _ —
I
I O —
/ _ — J T
amv N04'17'00"W — -
- 1 — ------- -
_ -292'------ I
N WO 1 I
I z; 1
QmU �W(A
O U Of co I
JQU
Q O �V1 I 1
292'-`
--
, I I
N - --- ---
I r
Wo I I
C0,,i;._------ I I
II �S / wN ,
Z
< M
Ip I I
(n W I O U K Q ��`f,^ 1 N I
�M J¢U oN, u1
Q J O a
Woz I �o4� ,`` I I O
Nom¢ I I _J I aoo I o
m
Won 1 �--�,°---292'---(.----
- � o I i
ZwN
MWw r , wo I I O
I;
N OCEU I `` ZmLUD h� I I
-zma I NWS, o 1 I
gOO 0,QU IIS 1 I
ra l M a I 1
o Www
I'CllL)l—oo 1`e j
JZ INY --J I I
��m •�•L----292'--------
- i I
1 i-WO F9 I I
I 1
^No I I
O I OU Of \ L, N 1 I
N I
� •Oo�'j I I I I
1
S3Nor—
I I 1 — yi- - - - - -
291.85' 3nN3nd
_o 06 _ — — — — —
-34'00"W — — —
— _ — T
M I
z
I
I � �
I N
Z U I O V
00
I I p 1 N 1
I J O Lri p \
o zQ
o �
a
C
L
Page 1 of 2
Troester, Steve
From: John Hanley Uhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 3:45 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: RE: Lorenz PDR
Message received. Thanks for your efforts.
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.n)rthsti r .com
From: Troester, Steve [mailto:Stroester@buttecounty.net]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 3:42 PM
To: John Hanley; Jay Lowe
Cc: Denise Lorenz; Thomas H. Phelps; Thistlethwaite, Charles; Jolliffe, Stacey; Snellings,Tim
Subject: RE: Lorenz PDR
Mr. & Mrs. Lorenz, John, Jay, and Tom,
Attached are the advance comments of the Agricultural Commissioner, Public Works, Environmental Health,
CDF, and LAFCo. We're looking forward to meeting with you and Mr. LorBnz next Wednesday, December 12 at
1:00 PM.
Inarticular, please see the attached comment from the Agricultural Commissioner of 11-28-07. Since that letter,
P 9
the Agricultural Commissioner has been out of town ands unavailable for additional comment. He will be back on
Monday Dec. 10.
Please also note comments#2 and 4 of the LAFCo letter of 12-7-07.
I have also included a copy of the Ordinance which allows for determination of"unusual circumstances" in the
implementation of the 300 buffer ordinance Section 1(d), page 2 and 3).
We look forward to meeting with you on Wednesday.
Steve Troester, Senior Planner
Butte County Dept. of Development Services
#7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA, 95965
(530) 538-7153
From: John Hanley [mailto:jhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 8:27 AM
To: Troester, Steve; Jay Lowe
Cc: Denise Lorenz; Thomas H. Phelps
Subject: Lorenz PDR
12!712007
Page 2 of 2
Steve,
Good morning. How are things progressing regarding the IDR response? Are we still on for the 12th of
December? We look forward to hearing from you.
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
12/7/2007
i
°�VTTF°
Department ofDevelopment Services ° °
° °
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
c0U Nty
DATE/TIME: Wednesday,December 5,2007, 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
LOCATION.• 7 County Center Drive, Conference Room A, Oroville, California
AGENDA
*Therer n r
a e o p olects scheduled for discussion, however Eric Schroth has requested that
there be a discussion concerning the process for reviewing and approving preliminary soils
reports per county code 20-72.
"Please see below per Steve Troester:
Lorenz PRED 07-005 (north side of Durham):
In our memo to you requesting your assessment and comments of this conceptual project for
Pre-Development Conference, under the heading of Project Description I stated, "Staff did
not find any unusual circumstances to support the reduction cr waiver of the ag buffer."
This comment reflected our initial assessment of the project when it was first submitted back
on July 1, 2007. Given the buffer design features that the applicant now proposes, we feel
that the project does now reflect support for consideration of unusual circumstances.
Just a reminder, the Inter-Departmental Review (IDR) meeting for this project is scheduled for
December 12. We are requesting that you provide us with your comments by Wednesday
December 5 (one week in advance of the conference) so that we can forward these to the
applicant in advance of the meeting. We believe that this procedure will be a more
productive process for the applicant, allowing them and their representatives to consider
responses and alternatives to concerns regarding their conceptual project.
Butte County Department of Development Services ■ 7 County Center Drive ■ Oroville,CA ■ (530)538-7601
Page 1 of 1
K://IDRAgendas/2006Agendas
Butte County Department of Development Services 0 A3TTF0
TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO,ASSISTANT DIRECTOR o 0
0 0
7 County Center Drive 0 _
_ 0
Oroville,CA 95965 0f
(530)538-7601 Telephone �+ •�
(530)538-7785 Facsimile OV Nt
www.buttecounty.net/dds
ADMINISTRATION" BUILDING ' PLANNING
November 21,2007
TO: FILE COPY
FROM: Steve Troester,Butte County Planning Division
SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application
APPLICANT: LORENZ, GERALD, PRED07-0005
APN: 040-180-051
DATE OF Inter-Departmental Review: 12/12/2007
IDR RESPONSE REGARDING 12/5/2007
PREDEVELOPMENT REVIEW DUE BY:
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT 12/'27/2007
CONDITIONS/MITIGATION MEASURES DUE BY:
The Department of Development Services is circulating this Pre-Development Conference
application to you for review and comments in advance of the scheduled December 12 Inter-
Departmental Review (IDR) meeting. We are requesting that you provide us with your comments by
Wednesday December 5 (one week in advance of the conference) so that we can forward these to
the applicant in advance of the meeting. We believe that this procedure will be a more productive
process for the applicant, allowing them and their representatives to consider responses and
alternatives to concerns regarding their conceptual project.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pre-development conference for proposal to subdivide a 5 acre
lot into four parcels on Jones Avenue. The property is adjacent to the north Durham green line
and OFC-designated land that appears to be in active agricultural operation, according to the
application. 300' ag buffer applies. The 5 acre property is just 292' wide. The ag buffer would
need to be substantially reduced or waived entirely in order to approve the map. Staff did not
find any unusual circumstances to support the reduction or waiver of the ag buffer..
COUNTY SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO.: 4
ZONING: SR-1 (Suburban Residential, one-acre parcels), GENERAL PLAN: AR
If a response cannot be submitted prior to the due dates listed above, please call Steve Troester at
538-7153 or send him an email at stroester@buttecounty.net. You do not have to respond to this
request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Please return response to project planner.
IDR COMMITTEE—APPLICATION COMPLETE
❑ No Name: Date:
❑ Yes Name: Date:
GVROJECTSUrakit Merge Documents\REQUEST FOR COMMENTS.doc
BUTTE COUNTY
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
APPLICANT: LORENZ, GERALD DATE: 7/11/2007
AGENT: <undefined value> APN: 040-180-051
FILE #: PRED07-0005 PLANNER: Steve Troester
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pre-development conference for proposal to subdivide a 5
acre lot into four parcels on Jones Avenue. The property is adjacent to the north Durham
green line and OFC-designated land that appears to be in active agricultural operation,
according to the application. 300' ag buffer applies. The 5 acre property is just 292' wide.
The ag buffer would need to be substantially reduced or waived entirely in order to
approve the map. Staff did not find any unusual circumstances to support the reduction or
waiver of the ag buffer.
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR'T'MENT FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS:
A. STREETS
❑ 1. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel/Final Map, provide a
fully executed road maintenance agreement for all non-publicly maintained access
roads on the County approved form. A note shall be placed on a separate
document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional
map sheet of the Parcel/Final Map stating: "In accordance with Civil Code
Section 845, maintenance of the road as shown hereon shall be shared by those
properties with a legal interest in it."
❑ 2. All access rights shall be reserved by deed per County Ordinance, offered for
dedication, and depicted on the Parcel/Final Map. For each private access within
the map boundary, place the following note on the Parcel/Final Map: "approved
road name is a non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress, road and public
services purposes, to be reserved in deeds and i3 hereby offered for dedication to
the County of Butte."
❑ 3. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel/Final Map, demonstrate to the Department of
Public Works that there is approved access conforming to County Code to each
parcel from a publicly maintained road.
❑ 4. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel/Final Map, Deed to
Butte County in fee simple feet of right-of-way from the centerline of
along the entire property frontage. The right-of-way shall be sufficient for the
installation of Improvement Standard No. S-5 at all street intersections.
❑ 5. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel/Final Map, relinquish
abutter's rights of access to Butte County, along the
frontage of parcels , except at approved access points.
❑ 6. Prior to recordation of the Parcel/Final Map, provide street name signs per
requirements of the Department of Public Work:. Street names shall be reviewed
by the County Address Coordinator and one name for each new street shall be
recommended to the Board of Supervisors for approval prior to recordation of the
Parcel/Final Map. A minimum of five alternate names for each new street shall
be submitted.
❑ 7. Prior to final road inspection, install all necessary traffic safety signs including
stop signs. A note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded
concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet of the Parcel/Final Map
stating: "No public entity shall be responsible for the maintenance of the traffic
safety signs including stop signs. In accordance with Civil Code Section 845,
maintenance of the traffic safety signs shall be shared by those properties with a
legal interest in them."
❑ 8. Prior to recordation of the Parcel/Final Map, obtain an encroachment permit and
improve all new and existing driveway approaches to publicly maintained roads
as specified in the County Improvement Standards and the terms of the
encroachment permit.
❑ 9. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel/Final Map, obtain an encroachment permit
and construct a standard S-18 road approach in accordance with County
Improvement Standards. Adequate sight distance at the intersection of access
road and shall be provided.
❑ 10. Provide a cul-de-sac designed and constructed as specified in the County
Improvement Standards. The Parcel/Final Map shall show the cul-de-sac.
❑ 11. Prior to the recordation of the Final map, construct, or provide a performance
bond and labor and material bond for the cons-ruction of, a '/2+ 12' / full street
section on to an RS-_geometric standard. Minimum
structural section to be_" AC, and_" AB,prime coat, fog seal and 95 % relative
compaction. Submit design to Land Developrnent Division for approval. "R"
value determination and other data may be required to support the section design
❑ 12. Prior to the recordation of the Final map, construct, or provide a performance
bond and labor and material bond for the construction of, a '/z + 12' / full street
section on to an RS- road standard with curb,
gutter, and sidewalk and AC, and _" AB, prime coat, fog seal and 95 %
relative compaction. Construct a '/2+ 12' /full street section on
to an RS-—road standard with_curb, gutter, and sidewalk and_" AC, and
AB, prime coat, fog seal and 95 % relative compaction. Submit design to Land
Development Division for approval. "R" value determination and other data may
be required to support the section design.
❑ 13. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, provide approved access to each parcel
from a County maintained road or from a state highway. Improve parcel
frontage to RS-_ LD-_ and access road to parcel being divided
to RS-_ LD-_. (If the parcels being and
are 5 acres or less in gross area,
submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works for plan
checking and approval prior to construction).
❑ 14. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, submit road and drainage improvement
plans for the installation and construction of the street frontage improvements on
to County Improvement Standards. Improve parcel
frontage on to a '/2 + 12' / full street section to an RS-
road standard including, but not limited to curb, gutter and sidewalk for parcels
with gross acreage of one acre or less.
❑ 15. Show on the additional map sheet of the Parcel/Final Map a_ft. building setback
from the edge of the ultimate right-of-way of
based on Butte County Code Section 24-75(d).
❑ 16. Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte County requirements,
accepted design criteria, and recommendations of Pacific Gas & Electric
Company. If the developer chooses to install the streetlights and pay energy costs
through a County Service Area (CSA), he/she must complete the formation of the
CSA prior to recordation of the Final Map. The CSA formation process will
require the Developer to fund the service until the beginning of the first fiscal year
in which service charges can be collected for the CSA, and agree to an annual
maximum service charge to ensure continued operation of the facilities.
B. DRAINAGE
❑ 1. Prior to recordation of the Parcel/Final Map, a plan for a permanent solution for
drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works.
The drainage plans shall detail existing drainage conditions and shall specify how
drainage waters shall be detained or retained on- site and/ or conveyed to the
nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall
provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or
facility.
❑ 2. Prior to final improvement inspection by the Department of Public Works, all new
drain inlets shall be labeled with the county approved drain marker per County
Standard S-40. Improvement plans shall show and/or note the requirements for
labeling inlets pursuant to Butte County Standard S-40.
❑ 3. Prior to recordation of the Parcel/Final Map, establish 100 year flood plain
elevations and the lowest floor elevations for any structures, in accordance with
Butte County Code §26-25. Show on the additional map sheet the elevations (by
contours) and the location of an accepted NGVD29 (National Geodetic Vertical
Datum of 1929) benchmark and a temporary benchmark on-site.
❑ 4. Prior to, or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel/Final Map, pay the
applicable drainage fees in effect at the time of recordation of the Parcel/Final
Map for the drainage area. (The current fee is now $
/acre.)
❑ 5. Prior to grading, a Construction Storm Water Permit will be required by the State
Water Resources Control Board if the project results in a disturbance (including
clearing, excavation, filling, and grading) of one or more acres. The Permit must
be obtained from the State Water Resources Control Board prior to construction.
If a Construction Storm Water Permit is required, place a note on an additional
map sheet that states: "The development of this Parcel/Final Map requires a
construction storm water permit. Construction activities that result in a land
disturbance of less than one acre, but which are part of a larger common plan of
development, also require a permit. Development of individual lots may require
an additional permit(s)."
C. PARCEL/FINAL MAP
❑ 1. Show all easements of record on the Parcel/Final Map.
❑ 2. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of,the Parcel/Final Map, pay in full
any and all delinquent, current and estimated taxes and assessments as specified
in Article 8 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7, of the California Government
Code commencing with Section 66492.
❑ 3. Pay the recording fees in effect at the time the Parcel/Final Map and related
documents are recorded.
❑ 4. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel/Final Map, pay all
applicable assessments established by affected assessment districts, in full.
❑ 5. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map, prove to the satisfaction of the Director
of Public Works that the parcel to be divided is a legal parcel.
❑ 6. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the
map or on an additional map sheet of the Parcel/Final Map regarding
BUTTE COUNTY
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
APPLICANT: LORENZ, GERALD DATE: 7/11/2007
AGENT: <undefined value> APN: 040-180-051
FILE #: PRED07-0005 PLANNER: Steve Troester
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pre-development conference for proposal to subdivide a 5
acre lot into four parcels on Jones Avenue. The property is adjacent to the north Durham
green line and OFC-designated land that appears to be in active agricultural operation,
according to the application. 300' ag buffer applies. The 5 acre property is just 292' wide.
The ag buffer would need to be substantially reduced or waived entirely in order to
approve the map. Staff did not find any unusual circumstances to support the reduction or
waiver of the ag buffer.
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
PLEASE CONTACT THE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS:
D. LEACHFIELDS
❑ 1. Identify on the additional map sheet a 100-ft. leachfield free setback from each
existing well.
❑ 2. Meet the sewage disposal requirements of Butte County Code Section 26-26 for
the installation of sewage disposal systems within a flood plain/floodway.
❑ 3. Prior to commencing construction or installation of any required site
improvements on the property, verify that winter groundwater elevations are in
compliance with County Improvement Standards, Appendix 7.
❑ 4. Identify on the additional map sheet an area for wells and a 100-ft. leachfield free
setback around that area on parcels
I
❑ 5. Identify on the additional map sheet a 50-ft. leachfield setback from the drainage
way on (lots) (parcels)
❑ 6. Identify on the additional map sheet a 100-ft. leachfield setback from the
highwater line of the creek on (lots) (parcels)
❑ 7. Identify on the additional map sheet a 100-ft. leachfield setback from the spring
on (lots) (parcels)
❑ 8. Identify on the additional map sheet a 200-ft. leachfield setback from the
highwater line of the lake on (lots) (parcels)
❑ 9. Identify on the additional map sheet a leachfield setback for four (4) times the
height of the cut on (lots) (parcels)
❑ 10. Locate, and, if necessary, relocate the sewage disposal systems serving existing
buildings on (lots) (parcels)
E. SEWAGE DISPOSAL AREAS
❑ 1. Identify on the additional map sheet those areas with slopes in excess of thirty
(30)percent as "Unsuitable for Sewage Disposal".
❑ 2. Identify on the additional map sheet usable sewage disposal areas proven to meet
the requirements of County Improvement Standards, Appendix 7. Combine with
adjacent (parcel(s)) (lot(s)) any parcel not proven to contain usable sewage
disposal area.
❑ 3. Identify on the additional map sheet unsuitable sewage disposal areas.
❑ 4. Those wells indicated on the Tentative Map or on the Final Map that are proposed
to be destroyed, in order to provide required usable sewage disposal areas, shall
be destroyed under a valid Butte County Environmental Health Division permit.
❑ 5. Identify on the additional map sheet that no water well may be located within 100
feet of the usable sewage disposal area on (lots) (parcels)
❑ 6. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, in the nitrate area record an executed
Future Sewer Service and Storm Drainage Agreement.
❑ 7. Meet the requirements of the (Watershed Protection Zone), (Villa Verona
Moratorium Area), (Cohasset Specific Plan).
F. INDIVIDUAL WATER SUPPLY
❑ 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, prove that the required quantities of
domestic water are available to (lots) (parcels)
❑ 2. Prove that the required quantities of domestic water are available or place the
statement on the additional map sheet of the Final Map that "There is no evidence
that domestic water is available" for (lots) (parcels)
❑ 3. Provide a source of domestic water for the building on (lot) (parcel)
❑ 4. Prior to Final Map, verify that domestic water can be provided to meet minimum
standards for and other suspected
contamination.
G. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
❑ 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, design and construct a new community
water supply system in compliance with the California State Safe Drinking Water
Act.
❑ 2. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, provide, a letter or other documentation
from stating that they are willing and able to
supply domestic water to (lots) (parcels)
❑ 3. Place a note on the additional map sheet that states "Development of (lots)
(parcels) will require connection to a public water
supply".
I
❑ 4. Prior to Final Map, verify that domestic water can be provided to meet minimum
standards for and other suspected contamination.
H. EXISTING COMMUNITY SEWER
❑ 1. Prior to the Final Map, provide a letter or other documentation from
stating that they are willing and able to supply sewer
service to (lots) (parcels)
❑ 2. Place a note on the additional map sheet that states "Development of (lots)
(parcels) will require connection to a public
sanitary sewer".
❑ 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, under a permit issued by the
Environmental Health Division, properly abandon the septic tank and connect the
dwelling(s) on (lots) (parcel(s)) to public sewer.
I. NEW COMMUNITY SEWER
❑ 1. Prior to the Final Map, provide community sewage collection, treatment and
disposal facilities in compliance with California State Regional Water Quality
Control Board, the Butte County Code, California Health and Safety Code,
Federal Law and other applicable codes and regulations governing the design,
construction and operation of the facilities.
❑ 2. Prior to the Final Map, comply with all sewage disposal facility construction
standards and health and safety and requirements of the Butte County Code,
California Health and Safety Code, Federal Law, and other applicable codes and
regulations governing the construction of such facilities.
❑ 3. Prior to the Final Map, provide a community services district or other legal
(government) entity adequate to insure the operation, maintenance or repair of the
sewage collection, treatment and disposal facilities. At a minimum, creation of
the entity shall:
a. Insure financing of operation, repair and maintenance.
b. Provide qualified individuals and operational procedures
for facility operations, repair and maintenance.
C. Provide adequate resources to comply with all monitoring
and other Regional Water Quality Control Board Waste
Discharge Requirements.
d. Provide adequate resources for facility inspections and
reports.
e. Provide adequate resources and/or mechanism to insure
adequate funding of a major sewage treatment and a
disposal facility replacement or reconstruction if necessary.
f. Provide a liability risk assessment for review by the County
of Butte.
g. Indemnify the County of Butte and community services
district or other government entity for all claims and
liability that may occur relative to the sewage disposal
facilities.
❑ 4. Locate wastewater ponds separate, as required, from areas of residential
development. Meet design requirements for control of mosquitoes and nuisance
insects in the wastewater ponds to the satisfaction of the appropriate Mosquito
and Vector Control District.
❑ 5. If a homeowners association is provided, obtain approval of the By-laws and CC
& Rs by Butte County Environmental Health, and, if required, by the California
State Regional Water Quality Control Board. Approval shall be obtained prior to
recordation of the Final Map.
J. COMMUNITY SEWER SPECIAL NITRATE AREA
❑ 1. In accordance with the Chico Area Nitrate Action Plan, provide for a connection
to the public sewer, if practical and feasible. A determination that connection is
not practical and feasible shall be made with the concurrence of the Central
Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Environmental Health
Division. NOTE: Board staff is currently requiring a density of no greater than
one equivalent residential unit per acre for development on septic tanks where
sewer is not available.
❑ 2. If connection to a public sewer is not feasible prior to recordation of the Final
Map:
a. Provide the minimum required sewage disposal area as
required by the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance and
the Nitrate Action Plan.
b. In conformance with the City of Chico Sanitary Sewer
Master Plan, dated December 20, 1985, construct dry line
sewer mains to serve the project and stubbed out to the
property line to for future public sewer connection.
C. Provide a community services district or other legal
(government) entity adequate to ensure the maintenance of
the dry sewer main and, when necessary, the activated
sewer main.
d. Sign and record sewer and storm drainage agreements for
compliance with the Nitrate Action Plan.
e. Place the following notes on the additional map sheet or
document to be recorded concurrently with the Final Map:
"Butte County permit for the installation of individual
septic systems shall require the construction of sewer
laterals for future public sewer connection." "Lots within
this subdivision are sewage subject to e flow restrictions that
J g
preclude high water use business activities."
"The discharge of wastewater, other than domestic sewage,
into individual sewage disposal systems requires approval
of the California State Regional Water Quality Control
Board, Central Valley Region."
f. Provide CC & Rs for the project that specify maximum
allowable domestic sewage flows per lot or parcel approved
by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central
Valley Region. Within the CC & Rs, provide for changes
to be with the concurrence of the Regional Water Quality
Control Board, Central Valley Region.
K. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL PLANS
❑ 1. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded with the map or on
an additional map sheet of the Parcel Map or Final Map stating "Solid waste
disposal shall be the responsibility of each property owner. Trash and debris shall
be picked up weekly by either a trash collection company approved by the County
of Butte or the property owner shall assume the responsibility for taking trash and
debris to a County approved land fill".
BUTTE COUNTY
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
APPLICANT: LORENZ, GERALD DATE: 7/11/2007
AGENT: <undefined value> APN: 040-180-051
FILE #: PRED07-0005 PLANNER: Steve Troester
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pre-development conference for proposal to subdivide a 5
acre lot into four parcels on Jones Avenue. The property is adjacent to the north Durham
green line and OFC-designated land that appears to be in active agricultural operation,
according to the application. 300' ag buffer applies. The 5 acre property is just 292' wide.
The ag buffer would need to be substantially reduced or waived entirely in order to
approve the map. Staff did not find any unusual circumstances to support the reduction or
waiver of the ag buffer.
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
PLEASE CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE
FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS:
L. BUILDING PERMITS
❑ 1. Prior to building permit issuance for a new residential dwelling unit(s), the
applicant shall pay all applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time
of acceptance of the application. Such fees, may include, but not be limited to:
Park Fee, School Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and
Sewer Service Fees, and Fire Protection Fees.
❑ 2. Prior to building permit issuance for a new commercial or industrial development,
or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay all applicable
development fees at the rate in effect at the time of acceptance of the application.
Such fees shall include, but not be limited to: School Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit
and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, and Fire Protection Fees.
M. EXISTING STRUCTURES
❑ 1. Comply with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering
use, area and fire resistant construction of existing buildings.
❑ 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning
regulations for the intended new use of the building(s) or the existing building(s)
shall be demolished.
BUTTE COUNTY
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
APPLICANT: LORENZ, GERALD DATE: 7/11/2007
AGENT: <undefined value> APN: 040-180-051
FILE #: PRED07-0005 PLANNER: Steve Troester
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pre-development conference for proposal to subdivide a 5
acre lot into four parcels on Jones Avenue. The property is adjacent to the north Durham
green line and OFC-designated land that appears to be in active agricultural operation,
according to the application. 300' ag buffer applies. The 5 acre property is just 292' wide.
The ag buffer would need to be substantially reduced or waived entirely in order to
approve the map. Staff did not find any unusual circumstances to support the reduction or
waiver of the ag buffer.
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE
FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS:
N. SITE DEVELOPMENT
❑ 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the plans, incorporating all applicable
conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division to verify
compliance with said conditions of approval.
❑ 2. Where a proposed development will have 5 or more mailing addresses, the site
plan shall show the location of centralized mail delivery units. Concrete bases
and the centralized mail delivery units, shall be installed by the developer.
Specifications of the concrete bases and mail delivery units shall be in accordance
with the requirements of Postal Service and the Butte County Department of
Public Works.
O. LANDSCAPING
❑ 1. A Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District, Community Service District,
Homeowners Association, or other alternative entity acceptable to the Planning
Manager, shall be established to maintain landscaping.
❑ 2. A plan of the existing on-site mature trees, located in any area proposed for
buildings and vehicular access, shall be provided to and approved by the Planning
Division prior to the issuance of building permits and/or prior to grading or
vegetation removal. The applicant shall minimize the removal of mature trees,
where possible. A mature tree shall be defined as a tree with a trunk measuring 4
inches in diameter, 4 feet from ground level. Mature trees removed shall be
replaced by planting replacement trees of equal number and not less than
gallon size.
❑ 3. For division of land, where lots of 1 acre or less are created, street trees of not less
than 15-gallon size shall be installed in accordance with Butte County standards
as specified in . The street trees shall be planted at an average of one every
30 feet on streets inside the land division and at an average of one every 20 feet
on Circulation Element roads.
❑ 4. All graded slopes, over 5 feet in height, or on slopes greater than %, shall be
seeded, planted, mulched or hydroseeded or otherwise protected to prevent
erosion. A permanent irrigation system shall be installed for non-native
vegetation. A one year Faithful Performance bond shall be posted to guarantee
installation and established growth.
❑ 5. Prior to the commencement of grading and/or construction activity, all individual
or groups of oak trees which are to be retained as part of the project, shall be fully
protected through the use of root protection zones (RPZ). During construction,
RPZs shall be established using protective fencing enclosing an area with a radius
1.5 times the distance from the trunk to the dripline. Within this protective buffer,
no grading, trenching, fill, or vegetation alteration of any kind shall be allowed.
The RPZs shall be maintained after the completion of construction in order to
continue to protect the oak trees, but the fencing shall be removed.
P. FINAL MAPS
❑ 1. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the
map or on an additional map sheet which states, "Structures, dumping, fill
material, vegetation removal and/or excavation shall not be allowed within the 50
foot No Disturbance Setback as depicted." The 50 foot "No Disturbance Setback"
shall be measured from the top of bank or outer edge of the riparian vegetation
along Creek, whichever is greater. Limited vegetation
removal necessary for flood control and normal orchard operations is permissible
within the "No Disturbance Setback;" however, all living and thriving native trees
shall be retained and all vegetation removal shall be approved by the Department
of Fish and Game prior to removal.
❑ 2. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the
map or on an additional map sheet which states, "Residences constructed on lots
and shall be constructed in a manner to bring the sound levels from
dBA exterior source to 45 dBA interior."
❑ 3. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the
map or on an additional map sheet which states, "At the time of building permit
application, if a Deer Herd Impact fee(s) is currently in effect, it shall be paid
prior to the issuance of the building permit."
❑ 4. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the
map or on an additional map sheet which states, "Fencing for areas other than
residential areas shall be limited to a maximum of 5 wire strands. The lower
strand shall be at least 16" above the ground and the upper strand shall be no
higher than 48" above the ground."
❑ 5. Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall pay all overdue or
outstanding County fees.
Q. GRADING
❑ 1: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the
Final Map or on an additional map sheet stating "During construction, should any
archaeological artifacts be discovered, the Planning Division shall be notified
immediately, and all work shall cease until a qualified archaeologist has examined
the artifacts and the site and submitted his or her findings to the Planning
Division, and recommended clearance to continue. Recommencement of
construction shall be upon the approval of the Planning Division. "Archaeological
artifacts" are defined as follows:
❑ 2. Prior to any clearing, grading and/or construction in a Federal or State identified
100 year floodplain and/or streambed the following entitlements must be
obtained: a California Fish and Game 1604 Streambed Alteration permit and an
Army Corps 404 permit or exemption certificate.
R. ADDITIONAL APPROVALS
❑ 1. This application is approved subject to the conditions contained herein. The
tentative subdivision map on file in the Planning Division identified as Exhibit
"B" and dated , 20_is incorporated by reference.
❑ 2. All lots are subject to the payment of the North Oroville/Thermalito Traffic
Impact Fees.
❑ 3. The applicant/owner shall sign the CSA 87 Traffic and Drainage Mitigation
Agreement and/or pay the required fee(s) prior to the issuance of building
permits. If the agreement is used it shall be recorded by the applicant prior to the
recordation of the Final Map.
❑ 4. The applicant shall execute the Oroville Area Traffic Mitigation Fee Agreement
prior to the recordation of the Final Map and place a note on the Final Map or
separate document which is to be recorded concurrently stating, "A traffic
mitigation fee of$750 shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for
each new or additional living unit."
❑ 5. To insure the maintenance and continuance of the orchard or other agricultural
use of the property, all lot owners shall enter into the County approved Orchard
Management Agreement. The agreement shall terminate in 10 years or upon a
rezoning of the parcel/lot to a zone other than A-5 through A-160. The agreement
shall be recorded and recording fees paid by the applicant.
❑ 6. The developer shall display a current County Zoning and County Land Use Map
in the sales office at all times, and/or suitable alternatives.
❑ 7. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include
but not be limited to showing future and existing schools, parks, and streets.
❑ 8. The Sheriff Facilities Impact Fee shall be paid, pursuant to the provisions of
Chapter 3, Article II of the Butte County Code, prior to the issuance of a building
permit or prior to the issuance of a Use Permit for a Mobile Home Park. The fee
amount shall be determined and calculated as of the date of application for
building permit.
❑ 9. Prior to recordation of the Final Map or application for a building permit, the
applicant shall pay the then-current established fee for the West Chico Fire
Station Fund.
❑ 10. Approval of this request shall not waive the requirement to comply with all
applicable Federal, State, and County laws, ordinances, and regulations in effect
at the time of building permit application.
BUTTE COUNTY
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
APPLICANT: LORENZ, GERALD DATE: 7/11/2007
AGENT: <undefined value> APN: 040-180-051
FILE #: PRED07-0005 PLANNER: Steve Troester
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pre-development conference for proposal to subdivide a 5
acre lot into four parcels on Jones Avenue. The property is adjacent to the north Durham
green line and OFC-designated land that appears to be in active agricultural operation,
according to the application. 300' ag buffer applies. The 5 acre property is just 292' wide.
The ag buffer would need to be substantially reduced or waived entirely in order to
approve the map. Staff did not find any unusual circumstances to support the reduction or
waiver of the ag buffer.
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
PLEASE CONTACT THE BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS:
S. FIRE CLEARANCE
❑ 1. Construction, installation or development of buildings and/or roads, driveways,
gates and bridges on parcels/lots shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe
Regulations—Public Resources Code 4290, 4291 and current Butte County
Improvement Standards, whichever is stricter.
❑ 2. Prior to construction, a pressurized community waters stem for fire protection is
required. Bonding may be allowed with the approval of the County Fire Chief.
Average required hydrant spacing is feet, hydrant size inches, and
residual fire flow of GPM. Fire hydrant identification, road reflectors
or post reflectors acceptable to the County Fire Chief shall be installed or bonded,
prior to Parcel or Final map recordation. Submit plans to the Fire Department for
review and approval prior to construction.
❑ 3. Place a note on a separate document and recorded concurrently with the Parcel,
Final map or an additional map sheet stating that "Fire suppression sprinkler
systems shall be installed in all new residential dwellings in accordance with
NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurized community water system with hydrants
that meet Fire Department specifications serves the property." A note stating
"Automatic Fire Sprinklers conforming to NFPA Standard 13D required" is to be
added to all affected building plans.
❑ 4. In lieu of hydrant installation, prior to recordation of the Parcel or Final map,
payment shall be made into the hydrant fund at the current rate per
lineal foot of street frontage.
❑ 5. Prior to building construction, provide an all weather access of at least 10 feet
wide and vertical clearance of 15 feet that will allow for ingress and egress and
accommodate a 40,000-pound fire apparatus to within 150 feet of all structures.
❑ 6. Place a note on a separate document,which is to be recorded concurrently with the Parcel
or Final map, or on an additional map sheet stating, "Building identification and/or
addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290 and shall
be posted at the time of permit issuance and maintained continuously thereafter.
Butte County Department of Development AUT rF
Services o °0
TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO,ASSISTANT DIRECTOR o 0
7 County Center Drive ° - °
Oroville, CA 95965 c�UIN4
(530)538-7601 Telephone
(530)538-7785 Facsimile
November 21,2007
To: Inter-Departmental Review Committee
Subject: Evaluation and Completeness of Application
Applicant: LORENZ,GERALD,PRED07-0005
Planner: Steve Troester
APN: 040-180-051
Location: Pre-development conference for proposal to subdivide a 5 acre lot into four
parcels on Jones Avenue.The property is adjacent to the north Durham
green line and OFC-designated land that appears to be in active agricultural
operation,according to the application. 300' ag buffer applies. The 5 acre
property is just 292' wide. The ag buffer would need to be substantially
reduced or waived entirely in order to approve the map. Staff did not find
any unusual circumstances to support the reduction or waiver of the ag
buffer.
30-Day Complete N/A
Date of IDR 12/12/2007
The Department of Development Services is circulating this Pre-Development Conference application to
you for review and comments in advance of the scheduled December 12 Inter-Departmental Review
(IDR)meeting. We are requesting that you provide us with your comments by Wednesday December 5
(one week in advance of the conference) so that we can forward these to the applicant in advance of the
meeting. We believe that this procedure will be a more productive process for the applicant,allowing
them and their representatives to consider responses and alternatives to concerns regarding their
conceptual project. Thank you for your cooperation in this new approach.
A hard copy of the application, including maps, has been sent to Environmental Health, LAFCo,
Agricultural Commission, Public Works, Assessor, and CDF. All Environmental Health correspondence
is routed through Karen Frederick at 7 County Center Drive. The purpose of this notice is to give you the
opportunity to comment on the completeness of this application electronically to the planner, so that
preparations can be made for the IDR meeting on X12 /21/2007
Do you find this application complete?
❑ NO. Please respond prior to or at the IDR meeting, regarding completeness of application. What
is needed to make the application complete?
K:/Planning/Projects/A New FileADR Memos/mR Completeness
8/30/05
❑ YES. My Department's conditions and/or mitigation measures are attached or will be provided at
the IDR meeting. If conditions cannot be provided at or prior to the IDR meeting they must be
provided no more than 1 week after the meeting.
Standard Conditions are attached for your convenience.
PLEASE SEND YOUR RESPONSE TO: stroester@buttecounty.net
Signature: Department:
Date:
KIPlanning/Projects/A New File/IDR Memos/IDR Completeness
8/30/05
COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST
Project Number: /, U7 0
County Offices and Cities:
Planning Division X Assessor's Office-Mapping — BCAG
X Environmental Health _ City of Biggs _ ALUC
— Building Manager _ City of Chico _ APCD
X LAFCo City of Gridley _ Butte Co.Farm Bureau
X Agricultural Commission— City of Oroville _ Chico Airport Commission
X Public Works/Land Dev _ Town of Paradise _ Chief Administrative Officer
County Counsel
Fire Protection:
X California Department of Forestry _ EI Medio Fire Protection District
Domestic Water:
S.F.W&P.Agency(OWID) _ Butte Water District — Del Oro Water Co.
California Water Service Co. _ Thermalito Irrigation District Other
Utilities:
_ PG&E North-Chico _ Pacific Bell Chambers Cable TV
PG&E South-Oroville Viacom Cable TV
Irrigation District:
Biggs/West Gridley Water _ Durham Irrigation Dist. _ Paradise Irrigation Dist.
Richvale Irrigation Dist. Table Mountain Irrigation Dist.
Sewer:
L.O.A.P.U.D. _ Sterling City Sewer Main _ Skansen Subdivision(CSA 21)
Drainage Districts:
Sacramento& San Joaquin Drainage Dist. — Reclamation District No. 833
Drainage District 200 _ Reclamation District No.2054
Reclamation District No.2056
State Agencies:
CalTrans _ Dept.of Water Resources _ Dept.of Fish and Game
Federal Agencies:
U.S.Forest Service _ U.S.Bureau of Land Management
Other Districts,Agencies,Committees,etc.:
"DRAFT"LEAD IN SHEET
PROJECT NUMBER: 00&'TAP#(s):
APPLICANT:
OWNER(S): S q M e
REPRESENTATIVE: /Vov
PROPOSED REQUE : (by counter planne } e -5;�. UA. vie nley_eLtnetl 5i�i/a�
40*1�
�'" Qche `nru 6fQi
FINAL REQUEST: (by project planner)
X9, 6J_&Ae�� �v
LOC TION: (,by counte Tanner 14ae �ZOv
FINAL LOCATION: (by project planner)
EXISTING ZONING: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
SIZE: v a� �c y�S SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT#:
DATE RECEIVED: COUNTER PLANNER'S INITIALS:
r
ASSIGNED PLANNER: r�r
C
Date Pro'ect Assigned: / 6
IDR Date: '
30 Day Complete:
Tentative Hearing Date:
PAR/C ;a00A, lop 1016064
RECORDING REQUESTED BY Recorded I REC FEE 7.80
MID VALLEY TITLE CO. OfficialyyRecords i
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Coun f I
MR.AND MRS. GERALD LORENZ CANDACE J. GRUBBS I
9456 JONES AVENUE Recorder -
DURHAM, CA 95938 ROSEMARY DICKSM i
Assistant I Myles
09:00AM 24-Mar-2004 I Page 1 of 1
Space Above This Line for Recorder's Use Only
A.P.N.: 040-180-051 Order No.: Escrow No.: 216762CH '
GRANT DEED
THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(s)DECLARE(s).THAT DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS:COUNTY$�—
[ computed on full value of property conveyed, or
[[ computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale,
] unincorporated area; [ ] Town of_, and
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
GERALD C. LORENZ AND DENISE LORENZ,HUSBAND AND WIFE
hereby GRANT(s) to GERALD LORENZ and DENISE LORENZ,Husband and Wife, as joint tenants
the following described property in the UNINCORPORATED AREA, County of BUTTE State of California;
!I PARCEL 1,AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP,RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON APRIL 17, 1980, IN BOOK 76 OF
MAPS,AT PAGE(S)53.
THIS CONVEYANCE CHANGES THE MANNER IN WHICH TITLE IS HELD, GRANTOR AND GRANTEE
REMAINTHE SAME AND CONTINUE TO HOLD THE SAME PROPORTIONATE INTEREST, R & T 11911.
GERALD C. LORENZDENISE LORENZ
Document Date: March 17,200
STATE OF CA IFORNIA )SS
COUNTY OF }
On before me,
personally appeared
personally known to me(or proved to on the basis of satisfactory evidence)to be the person(s)whose name(s)Ware subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies)and that by Itis/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s)or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)acted,executed the instrument..
WITNESS my fTicta 1.
Signature ..»• BUTTE
A.M. MORROW
COMM. # 1270896 t� ,� COUNTY
H COUP OF BUTTE W
My CDMM.Explm July 16,2004 JUL 1 12007
r DES LOpML T
Mail Tax Statements to: SAME AS ABOVE or Address Noted Below
PREDEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE
COUNTY OF BUTTE
FOR
GERALD & DENISE LORENZ
APN: 040-180-051
7/6/07
Job # 9541
BUTTE COUNTY FEE:
PREDEVELOPMENT CONFRENCE: $1,766.20
TOTAL: $1,766.20
I will need one check for the Predevelopment Conference. Said check can be made
payable to County of Butte. �f
,j
COUNTY
,lUt 1 1IM
.
'VE SERC SNT
•t
NorthS ar
ENGINEERING
Civil Engineers•Planners.•Surveyors
TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO: 3t FROM:
Planner of the Day John Hanley
company. date:
Land Development 7/6/2007
address: job number:
7 County Center Drive 9541
transmitting the follouring:
Oroville,CA 95965 Predevelopment conference application
project:
Gerald Lorenz PreDevelopment
❑FOR APPROVAL❑FOR INFORMATION ❑FOR CHECKING Q FOR PROCESSING ❑ FOR YOUR FILES
❑ PLEASE REVIEW&COMMENT ❑PLEASE REPLY ❑ AS REQUESTED
NOTES/COMMENTS:
Planner of the Day,
Please process the following materials for a predevelopment conference with the County of
Butte.
1. Pre-Development conference informational sheet
2. Project Setting Description(items 1 through 5)
3. Pre-Development application
4. Agent Authorization
5. Record data
6. Site Map(20 copies)
7. Application fee$1,766.20(check# ) BUTTE
COUNTY
youJUL 1 12007
DEVELOPMENT
Lowell Hanley SERVICES
Jo
Senior Technician
Page 1 of 2
Troester, Steve
From: John Hanley Uhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:20 AM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: RE: Lorenz PRED 07-005
Steve,
Thanks for the update and I (we) appreciate your efforts. Look forward to seeing you on December 12.
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
From: Troester, Steve [mailto:Stroester@buttecounty.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:16 AM
To: John Hanley
Subject: FW: Lorenz PRED 07-005
Hi John,
Thanks for your graciousness and that of your client yesterday.
Your e-mail expressed a legitimate concern, about the wording of our memo requesting comments form the IDR
Committee members. I hope that the e-mail below, which I sent out to the members, will clarify and appropriately
refocus their analysis and comments.
Steve
From: Troester, Steve
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:11 AM
To: Schroth, Eric; Edell, Stuart; Fogel, Doug; Read, Darren; Betts, Steve; Hill, Rob; Price, Richard
Cc: Thistlethwaite, Charles; Jolliffe, Stacey; Calarco, Pete
Subject: Lorenz PRED 07-005
I
IDR Members,
i
Regarding: Lorenz PRED 07-005 (north side of Durham)
i
In our memo to you requesting your assessment and comments of this ccnceptual project for Pre-Development
Conference, under the heading of Project Description I stated,
"Staff did not find any unusual circumstances to support the reduction or waiver of the ag buffer."
This comment reflected our initial assessment of the project when it was first submitted back on July 11, 2007.
Given the detailed buffer design features that the applicant now proposes, we feel that the project now should be
assessed for consideration of"unusual circumstances" under the process detailed in Ordinance 3953.
11/29/2007
Page 2 of 2
Just a reminder, the Inter-Departmental Review(IDR) meeting for this project is scheduled for December 12. We
are requesting that you provide us with your comments by Wednesday December 5 (one week in advance
of the conference)so that we can forward these to the applicant in advance of the meeting. We believe that this
procedure will be a more productive process for the applicant, allowing them and their representatives to consider
responses and alternatives to concerns regarding their conceptual project.
Thanks much!
Steve Troester, Senior Planner
Butte County Dept. of Development Services
#7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA, 95965
(530) 538-7153
11/29/2007
Page 1 of 1
Troester, Steve
From: John Hanley Uhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 3:33 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: Lorenz PDR
Steve,
Thanks for your input today regarding the ag buffer and the application in general. You are always a wealth of
knowledge and I appreciate your candor. One item I would like to clear up before we meet again has to do with
the copy of the IDR memo you gave to me that schedules the meeting for 12/12/07. Under the heading of Project
Description you say, "Staff did not find any unusual circumstances to support the reduction or waiver of the ag
buffer." I thought we agreed today that there were unusual circumstances, i.e. imposing a 300' ag buffer over a
parcel that is zoned SR-1. I hope I can count on you to reword this so we at least have a fighting chance to get
the project past the predevelopment stage.
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
11/29/2007
Page 1 of 1
Troester, Steve
From: Troester, Steve
Sent: Monday„ October'08, 2007 10:14 AM
To: 'John Hanley'
Cc: Jay Lowe; Price, Richard; Jolliffe, Stacey; Thistlethwaite, Charles
Subject: RE: Lorenz PRED
John,
Sounds good. We'll begin processing our comments and scheduling the PRED Conference with your client as
soon as we get their submittal.
Steve
From: John Hanley [mailto:jhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 8:08 AM
To: Troester, Steve
Cc: Jay Lowe
Subject: Lorenz
Steve,
Gerald and Denise are now working with a professional landscape architect to create some options regarding an
agricultural buffer. I have passed along your emails and details concerning said buffer and we should have
something for review before too much.longer. Thanks for your continued patience.
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
10/8/2007
Page 1 of 3
V�
I
Troester, Steve
From: John Hanley Uhanley@northsta)reng.com]
Sent: Thursday,, September 27, 2007/245 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: RE: Lorenz PD
Steve,
One of the layouts will be approved by the client, but which one depends on Garry Cooper. They are working with
a landscape architect to come up with a design for the agricultural buffer, so their willingness to make this work
should be evident to those that will review their application. Thanks for the information. It's all helpful. I should
hear somethingfrom Denise next week regarding said buffer plans. The• seem very determined to make this
9 9 P 1 rY
work and I hope we can make it work for them.
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
From: Troester, Steve [mailto:Stroester@buttecounty.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 2:22 PM
To: John Hanley
Subject: RE: Lorenz PD
John,
Once again, this PRIED conference application is an initial review of a conceptual map. County staff can
comment on either or both.scenarios. You can describe several scenarios for comment if you wish. Your question
here doesn't seem to require any particular graphic preparation,just a question to the various county departments
as part of what you describe.
In the Parcel Map application (as informally, during the PRIED) the applicant would make their case for an
Unusual Circumstance Exception to the standard 300' buffer(see here attached copy of the resolution adopted by
the Board on Feb. 13, 2007, page 2-4).
We're ready to circulate any proposals scenarios your applicant may wish to describe, to all county departments
for comments.
Steve Troester, Senior Planner
Butte County Dept. of Development Services
#7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA, 95965
(530) 538-7153
From: John Hanley [mailto:jhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 3:22 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: RE: Lorenz PD
Steve,
10/8/2007
Page 2 of 3
Would the proposed buffer run the length of the three new lots (470' ) or would it be the entire length of the
property?
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
From: Troester, Steve [mailto:Stroester@buttecounty.net]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 9:04 AM
To: John Hanley
Subject: RE: Lorenz PD
Early and often! Sounds good. We'd love to see them!
Steve
From: John Hanley [mailto:jhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 8:25 AM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: RE: Lorenz PD
Steve,
That's what I needed to hear. When I finish up this latest revision, I'd like to send it to you for comments before I
submit the map again. Would you mind?
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
From: Troester, Steve [mailto:Stroester@buttecounty.net]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 7:53 AM
To: John Hanley
Cc: Jolliffe, Stacey
Subject: RE: Lorenz PD
John,
You bet, we'd entertain FOUR or FIVE scenarios! The more detailed the better. The Pre-Development Review is
a conceptual review. This is purely the applicant's time to consult with Ccunty staff. The more options and ideas
that are presented, the more possibility that the applicant will be able to identify successful alternatives. Creativity
and flexibility are always useful. Bring-em-on.
Steve Troester, Senior Planner
10/8/2007
Page 3 of 3
Butte County Dept. of Development Services
#7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA, 95965
(530) 538-7153
From: John Hanley [mailto:jhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 1:27 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: Lorenz PD
Steve,
At this Pre-development meeting, will the County entertain two scenarios? The first being a four lot split like we
have discussed and the other a possible joint venture with Garry Cooper? I plan to show some of the features i.e.
road on the updated site plan. Let me know.
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
10/8/2007
Page 1 of 3
Troester, Steve
From: Troester, Steve
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 2:22 PM
To: 'John Hanley'
Subject: RE: Lorenz PD
Attachments: SCN_20070927141156_001.pdf
John,
Once again, this PRED conference application is an initial review of a conceptual map. County staff can
comment on either or both scenarios. You can describe several scenarios for comment if you wish. Your question
here doesn't seem to require any particular graphic preparation,just a question to the various county departments
as part of what you describe.
In the Parcel Map application (as informally, during the PRED) the applicant would make their case for an
Unusual Circumstance Exception to the standard 300' buffer(see here attached copy of the resolution adopted by
the Board on Feb. 13, 2007, page 2-4).
We're ready to circulate any proposals scenarios your applicant may wish to describe, to all county departments
for comments.
Steve Troester, Senior Planner
Butte County Dept. of Development Services
#7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA, 95965
(530) 538-7153
From: John Hanley [mailto:jhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 3:22 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: RE: Lorenz PD
Steve,
Would the proposed buffer run the length of the three new lots (470' ) or would it be the entire length of the
property?
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
From: Troester, Steve [mailto:Stroester@buttecounty.net]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 9:04 AM
To: John Hanley
Subject: RE: Lorenz PD
Early and often! Sounds good. We'd love to see them!
9/27/2007
V'
Page 2 of 3
Steve
From: John Hanley [mailto:jhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 8:25 AM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: RE: Lorenz PD
Steve,
That's what I needed to hear. When I finish up this latest revision, I'd like to send it to you for comments before I
submit the map again. Would you mind?
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
From: Troester, Steve [mailto:Stroester@buttecounty.net]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 7:53 AM
To: John Hanley
Cc: Jolliffe, Stacey
Subject: RE: Lorenz PD
John,
You bet, we'd entertain FOUR or FIVE scenarios! The more detailed the better. The Pre-Development Review is
a conceptual review. This is purely the applicant's time to consult with County staff. The more options and ideas
that are presented, the more possibility that the applicant will be able to icentify successful alternatives. Creativity
and flexibility are always useful. Bring-em-on.
Steve Troester, Senior Planner
Butte County Dept. of Development Services
#7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA, 95965
(530) 538-7153
From: John Hanley [mailto:jhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 1:27 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: Lorenz PD
Steve,
At this Pre-development meeting, will the County entertain two scenarios? The first being a four lot split like we
have discussed and the other a possible joint venture with Garry Cooper? I plan to show some of the features i.e.
road on the updated site plan. Let me know.
John Lowell Hanley
9/27/2007
Ordinance No.3_
AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 24-286 AND DELETING SECTION 24-285 OF
ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 24 OF THE BUTTE COUNTY CODE
The Board of'Supervisors of the County of Butte ordains as follows:
Section 1. Article V, Section 24-286 of the Butte County Code is added to read as follows:
24-286 Agricultural Buffer Setback.
(a) Purpose. The purpose is to conserve and stabilize agricultural land uses in order to protect
d conversion to urban uses and for the following:
agricultural lands from encroachment an g
(1) To require development to provide land use transitions, setbacks and buffers between urban
development and agricultural uses,in.order to reduce interference and conflict.
(2) To create development and performance standards designed to protect agricultural uses from
urban encroachment conflicts.
(3) .To provide a clear delineation between long-term agricultural production lands and
city/community areas.
(b) Applicability. These requirements are applicable to arras with a general plan land use
designation of Grazing and Open Lands (GOL) and Orchard and Field Crop (OFC) and areas
abutting those two land use designations along the interior 300 feet of community boundaries
and spheres of influence lines in order to protect existing agricultural uses from incompatible use
conflicts. A separate exhibit adopted by resolution and as amended illustrates the applicability
of this section. The requirements of this section are in addition to other zoning standards.
Where there is a conflict, the more restrictive shall apply.
Page l of 5
(c) Standards
(1)Residential
a. Setback. The setback distance for dwellings shall be 300 feet from all property lines. This
C
istance may be adjusted based upon an Unusual Circumstance Review in subsection(d).
b. Alternatives to the above setback requirement may be considered by the Department of
Development Services Director (Director), who shall consult with the County Agricultural
Commissioner, as follows:
1. The dwellings are proposed in close proximity to each other such that the same practical effect
of providing the 300-foot setback is provided.
2. If an existing parcel is of such size and/or shape that :he setback distance identified in
subsection (c) is not possible and conditions referenced in subsection (d) do not exist, then the
dwelling shall be placed the greatest distance from all relevant property tine(s), or other location
that presents the least detriment to agricultural practices on adjacent properties,provided there is
no interference with easements, septic systems and/or prior conditions of approval, and
considering parcel shape, slope,topography and/or other physical features,.
(2) Buffer Guidelines. Buffer guidelines are as adopted by resolution by the Board of
Supervisors for the purpose of illustrating buffer requirements for various situations. These
guidelines shall be utilized in rendering determinations relating to the required setback. If such
guidelines have not been adopted, then the Director's review and consultation with the County
Agricultural Commissioner's Office shall serve that purpose.
(d) Unusual Circumstance Review. The setback distance identified in subsection (c) shall be
reviewed for Unusual Circumstances that may result in an adjustment in the setback distance as
Page 2 of 5
identified in subsection (c) above. The setback distance may be adjusted by the Director. The
Director shall consult with the Agricultural Commissioner prior to rendering a determination to
adjust the setback distance_ An adjustment by the Director shall be based upon an evaluation of
the following criteria, as they exist on the subject or surrounding property, provided that such
adjustment would not result in a modification to adjacent agricultural practices:
(1) Parcel size and shape
(2) Location of residence(s)
(.3) Infrastructure and other existing uses
(4) Natural physical features and topography
(5) Other circumstances not specified above.
(e) Non-Residential- (reserved)
(f) Consultation with Agricultural Commissioner. The Director shall consult with the
Agricultural Commissioner on permits (non-discretionary) and projects(discretionary) actions as
follows:
(1) Permits. Permits shall be reviewed concurrently with the':)uilding permit review process.
(2) Projects. Projects shall be reviewed during the project review process. The Director shall
consult with the County Agricultural Commissioner prior to rendering a recommendation to the
Planning Commission.
(g)Determination.
(1) Permits (Non-discretionary). The procedure for non-discretionary review by the Director
,t
shall be as follows:
Page 3 of 5 .
a. The Director shall review and render a determination for applicable non-discretionary permits
and approvals.
b.No hearing is required for any non-discretionary permit reviaw.
c. The decision may include permit application modifications to establish consistency with this
chapter.
(2) Projects (Discretionary). The Planning Commission shall review and render a determination
on the Director's recommendation regarding Unusual Circumstances for discretionary actions for
which the Planning Commission has authority. If a project requires the Planning Commission to
make a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors, then the Board of Supervisors shall render
a determination.
(h) Review Fee. Applicant shall pay the required review fee for consideration of compliance
with this chapter for projects and permits at the time of filing the application in an amount as
established by the Board of Supervisors.
24-287---24-289 Reserved.
Section 2. Article V, Section 24-285 of the Butte County Code is deleted to read as follows:
24-285 (Deleted)
Section 3. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any
person or circumstances is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such provision shall be deemed severable, and the invalidity thereof shall not affect the
Page 4 of 5
remaining provisions or other applications of the Ordinance which can be given effect without
the invalid provision or application thereof.
Section 4. Effective Date and Publication. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty(30) days after
the date of its passage. The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors is authorized and directed to
publish this ordinance before the expiration of fifteen(15)days after its passage. This Ordinance
shall be published once, with the names of the members of the Board of Supervisors voting for
and against it, in the Enterprise-Record a newspaper of general circulation published in the
County of Butte, State of California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of
California,on the 13th day of February , 2007,by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Connelly, Kirk, Josiassen, Yamaguchi and Chair Dolan
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
NOT VOTING: None
(jJanoDolan, ir of the
ard of Superyisors
ATTEST:
PAUL McINTOSH,
Chief Administrative Officer
and Clerko Bear
Y
i
Page 5 of 5
Page 1 of 2
Troester, Steve
From: John Hanley Ohanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24,-,,20077 .25 AM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: RE: Lorenz PD
Steve,
That's what I needed to hear. When I finish up this latest revision, I'd like to send it to you for comments before I
submit the map again. Would you mind?
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
From: Troester, Steve [mailto:Stroester@buttecounty.net]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 7:53 AM
To: John Hanley
Cc: Jolliffe, Stacey
Subject: RE: Lorenz PD
John,
You bet, we'd entertain FOUR or FIVE scenarios! The more detailed the better. The Pre-Development Review is
a conceptual review. This is purely the applicant's time to consult with County staff. The more options and ideas
that are presented, the more possibility that the applicant will be able to identify successful alternatives. Creativity
and flexibility are always useful. Bring-em-on.
Steve Troester, Senior Planner
Butte County Dept. of Development Services
#7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA, 95965
(530) 538-7153
From: John Hanley [mailto:jhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 1:27 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: Lorenz PD
Steve,
At this Pre-development meeting, will the County entertain two scenarios? The first being a four lot split like we
have discussed and the other a possible joint venture with Garry Cooper? I plan to show-some of the features i.e.
road on the updated site plan. Let me know.
John Lowell Hanley
9/24/2007
From: Troester, Steve
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 2:24 PM
To: 'John Hanley'
Subject: RE: Lorenz Pre-development application
John,
Thanks for speaking with me about this PRED. application. Attached please find the design
features materials that I promised. Hopefully you will find some of these to be useful in this map.
As we discussed, the primary concerns that might be attenuated to some degree by buffer design
features are dust, noise, spray drift, visual screening, and trespass fencing.
We will wait for you final submittal before agendizing this PRED application for the Inter-
Departmental Review Committee.
Thanksl
Steve Troester, Senior Planner(538-7153)
From: John Hanley [mailto:jhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 1:39 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Cc: Denise Lorenz
Subject: Lorenz Pre-development application
Steve,
The Lorenz' have decided to move forward with their application. When can they expect to meet
with the County regarding the project?
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
i
I
i
_ �V S
I - as
Yd' _Z -
` -
Page 1 of 2
Troester, Steve
From: Thistlethwaite, Charles
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:00 PM
To: Calarco, Pete
Cc: Snellings, Tim; Troester, Steve; Jolliffe, Stacey
Subject: RE: Lorenz pre-development(PRED07-0005)
I agree with Pete, a pre-development review at this stage would not provide any useful information. A map with
building envelopes could yield the Ag Commissioner's recommendation on an Unusual Circumstance Review
under 24-286 (d); however, I am afraid this project will be accused of'creating unusual circumstances' rather than
advancing the evolution of buffer guidelines.
As of August 16th,Stacey had indicated we were holding onto the check(3RED07-0005 application was filed on
July 11th). We probably shouldn't have held onto it(unreceipted) as long as we did. I am also concerned we
(apparently)did not send her a receipt.
Chuck
OUTrF Charles S. Thistlethwaite,AICP
Manager,Planning Division
° Butte County Department of Development Services
° ` ' ° E-mail: CThistiethwaite(&buttecoun .net
c°u Phone: (530) 538-6572 FAX. (530) 538-2140
Key to Subject Line Abbreviations
END-My whole message in in the subject line(no need to open)
FYI-For your information(and response if warranted)
NFM—Need for meeting
NRB-I need a response by the time and date listed
NRN-No Reply Needed
RFU-Request for Update(please let me know the status of...
TY-Thank You(no response needed)
LEARN TO MANAGE YOUR E-MAIL OVERLOAD:
hftp://hbswk.hbs.edu/archiveL4438.html
htto://www npr.org/templates/story/story.pho ?sto[yld=4490997
From: Calarco, Pete
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 1:37 PM
To: Troester, Steve; Jolliffe, Stacey
Cc: Snellings,Tim; Thistlethwaite, Charles
Subject: Lorenz pre-development
Steve, I spoke with Judy at Curt's office regarding his meeting request. She indicated that he will not likely be
available until next week. Another related issue was that the applicant was under the understanding that we were
not going to deposit her check and when she was balancing her checkbook, she noticed the check has been
deposited.
It turns out that Stu has some background information on this property. You had wondered why this and the
parcel to the south is a pocket of SR-1. Stu says that there had been an approved tentative subdivision with 9
lots on the two parcels with a cul-de-sac running down the middle. This was approved when the D2N Plan was in
process. At the time of the Plan adoption, this property had an approved tentative map on it. For this reason, the
property was zoned with SR-1 to account for the map. The applicants did not final the map and it expired.
I think as submitted, there is no much value in conducting pre-development review. However, if they augment
8/30/2007
Page 2 of 2
their application showing proposed house locations, locations of all adjacent houses/structures and a proposal for
a reduced buffer distance including a buffer strategy that will give us more information so that they can get
additional feedback to include in the Map application if they choose to file one. All disclaimers apply—this does
not mean that we necessarily endorse this approach, does not guarantee approval, does not guarantee
recommendation of approval, does not guarantee that there are not other issues. They would be blazing the trail
of buffer guidelines. Your thoughts? --pete
8/30/2007
-7-7 ;
Seo � So
1
II//
Page 1 of 2
w
Troester, Steve
From: Jolliffe, Stacey
Sent: Thursday,�August 16, 2007 2:13 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: FW: potential parcel split
From: Yamaguchi, Kim
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 2:03 PM
To: Denise Lorenz
Cc: Snellings,Tim
Subject: RE: potential parcel split
Planning is correct. You will have to address the 300 foot ag setback. There are "unusual circumstances"that
allow the Board of Supervisors to adjust the ag setback. You decide if you think the board will reach those
findings.
Kim K. Yamaguchi
From: Denise Lorenz [mailto:denlor123@earthlink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 8:30 PM
To: Yamaguchi, Kim
Subject: FW: potential parcel split
I will try the email address this way. Hopefully it will go through. Sorry for the delay!
Denise L.
From: Denise Lorenz [mailto:denlor123@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 12:34 PM
To: 'kyamaguchi@butteco.net'
Subject: potential parcel split
Hi, Mr. Yamaguchi:
My husband, Gerald, spoke with your secretary this morning and recommended that we email you. We have
been playing phone tag with Mr. Josiassen regarding this issue. I understand that he is on vacation until next
week and thought we would try to get some feedback from you as well.
We bought our land in Dec. 1997. It had already been zoned 1 ac. minin'um and had an approved plot map
(1992)to put 9 lots on ours and our neighbors' total of nearly 10 acres. We are now wanting to move ahead with
splitting our 5 acres into 4 lots and understand that there is now a new guideline requiring 300' set-back from our
neighbors orchard.
The planning dept. is telling us that it is no longer a splittable parcel. We believe this is discriminatory in that
houses have been built behind us within 90 ft of the orchard. We are willing to keep a 150' setback and plant
redwood trees along the property line next to the orchard. The trees will be taller than the orchard trees within 3
years and act as a barrier to the spray from the orchard. We believe that our land should be allowed to be split.
The AP#to our land is 040-180-051, address 9456 Jones Ave., Durham.
Thanks for your help with this,
8/16/2007
Page 1 of 1
Troester, Steve
From: Jolliffe, Stacey
Sent: Thursday`August 16, 2007 2:09 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: FW: Small subdivision for the Lorenz' on Jones Ave
Stacey Jolliffe
Principal Planner, Current Planning Section
Butte County Dept, of Development Services
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95969
Phone: 530.538.7541; FAX 530.538.2140
Email: sjolliffe0buttecountv.net
Webite: www.buttecounty.net/dds
From: Jolliffe, Stacey
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 5:16 PM
To: Snellings,Tim
Cc: Thistlethwaite, Charles
Subject: Small subdivision for the Lorenz' on Jones Ave
Hello,
In July, we received a pre-development conference request for a proposal to subdivide a 5 acre lot into four
parcels for the Lorenz' on Jones Avenue.
The property is adjacent to the green line and OFC-designated land that appears to be in active agricultural
operation, according to the application. So, the ag buffer applies.
The 5 acres property is just 292'wide. The ag buffer would need to be substantially reduced or waived entirely in
order to approve the map.
Staff did not find any unusual circumstances to support the reduction or waiver of the ag buffer.
As for the pre-development conference request, Northstar Engineering put together a very thorough package.
We did not believe we had new research to provide.
My last discussion with project planner Steve Troester was that Steve would call the applicant and offer a refund
of fees, since we did not believe we could provide additional information.
(If the applicants want to get the item to the decision-makers, irrespective of ag buffers, then we need an
application. A pre-development request doesn't get them there.)
I am not sure if Steve reached the applicants before his vacation; he'll be back on Monday August 13.
Please let me know if I can provide additional assistance.
Stacey Jolliffe
Principal Planner, Current Planning Section
Butte County Dept, of Development Services
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95969
Phone: 530.538.7541; FAX 530.538.2140
Email: sjolliffeCalbuttecountv.net
Webite: www.buttecounty.net/dds
8/16/2007
7-2
J7
-(17- f
0 9
/-�
From: Yamaguchi, Kim
Sent: Tuesday,July 31, 2007 2:03 PM
To: Denise Lorenz--
Cc: Snellings,Tim
Subject: RE: potential parcel split
Planning is correct. You will have to address the 300 foot ag setback. There are"unusual
circumstances"that allow the Board of Supervisors to adjust the ag setback. You decide if you
think the board will reach those findings.
Kim K. Yamaguchi
From: Denise Lorenz [mailto:denlor123@earthlink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 8:30 PM
To: Yamaguchi, Kim
Subject: FW: potential parcel split
I will try the email address this way. Hopefully it will go through. Sorry for the delay!
Denise L.
From: Denise Lorenz [mailto:denlor123@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 12:34 PM
To: 'kyamaguchi@butteco.net'
Subject: potential parcel split
Hi, Mr. Yamaguchi:
My husband, Gerald, spoke with your secretary this morning and recommended that we email
you. We have been playing phone tag with Mr. Josiassen regard.ng this issue. I understand that
he is on vacation until next week and thought we would try to get some feedback from you as
well.
We bought our land in Dec. 1997. It had already been zoned 1 ac. minimum and had an
approved plot map (1992)to put 9 lots on ours and our neighbors'total of nearly 10 acres. We
are now wanting to move ahead with splitting our 5 acres into 4 lots and understand that there is
now a new guideline requiring 300'set-back from our neighbors orchard.
The planning dept. is telling us that it is no longer a splittable parcel. We believe this is
discriminatory in that houses have been built behind us within 90 ft of the orchard. We are willing
to keep a 150'setback and plant redwood trees along the property line next to the orchard. The
trees will be taller than the orchard trees within 3 years and act as.a barrier to the spray from the
orchard. We believe that our land should be allowed to be split.
The AP#to our land is 040-180-051, address 9456 Jones Ave., Durham.
Thanks for your help with this,
Denise Lorenz
Page 1 of 1
Troester, Steve
From: Calarco, Pete
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 1:37 PM
To: Troester, Steve; Jolliffe, Stacey
Cc: Snellings, Tim; Thistlethwaite, Charles
Subject: Lorenz pre-development
Steve, I spoke with Judy at Curt's office regarding his meeting request. She indicated that he will not likely be
available until next week. Another related issue was that the applicant was under the understanding that we were
not going to deposit her check and when she was balancing her checkbook, she noticed the check has been
deposited.
It turns out that Stu has some background information on this property. You had wondered why this and the
parcel to the south is a pocket of SR-1. Stu says that there had been an approved tentative subdivision with 9
lots on the two parcels with a cul-de-sac running down the middle. This was approved when the D2N Plan was in
process. At the time of the Plan adoption, this property had an approved tentative map on it. For this reason, the
property was zoned with SR-1 to account for the map. The applicants did not final the map and it expired.
I think as submitted, there is no much value in conducting pre-development review. However, if they augment
their application showing proposed house locations, locations of all adjacent houses/structures and a proposal for
a reduced buffer distance including a buffer strategy that will give us more information so that they can get
additional feedback to include in the Map application if they choose to file one. All disclaimers apply—this does
not mean that we necessarily endorse this approach, does not guarantee approval, does not guarantee
recommendation of approval, does not guarantee that there are not other issues. They would be blazing the trail
of buffer guidelines. Your thoughts? --pete
9/17/2007
Page 1 of 2
Troester, Steve
From: Thistlethwaite, Charles
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:00 PM
To: Calarco, Pete
Cc: Snellings, Tim; Troester, Steve; Jolliffe, Stacey
Subject: RE: Lorenz pre-development(PRED07-0005)
agree with Pete, a pre-development review at this stage would not provide any useful information. A map with
building envelopes could yield the Ag Commissioner's recommendation on an Unusual Circumstance Review
under 24-286 (d); however, I am afraid this project will be accused of'creating unusual circumstances' rather than
advancing the evolution of buffer guidelines.
As of August 16th Stacey had indicated we were holding onto the check(PRED07-0005 application was filed on
July 11th). We probably shouldn't have held onto it(unreceipted)as long as we did. I am also concerned we
(apparently)did not send her a receipt.
Chuck
°OUTTE° Charles S. Thistlethwaite,AICP
e ° Manager,Planning Division
Butte County Department of Development Services
O -etiF, O
°COu��e E-mail: CThistlethwaite@buttecounty.net
Phone: (530) 538-6572 FAX: (530) 538-2140
Key to Subject Line Abbreviations
END-My whole message in in the subject line(no need to open)
FYI-For your information(and response if warranted)
NFM—Need for meeting
NRB-I need a response by the time and date listed
NRN-No Reply Needed
RFU-Request for Update(please let me know the status of...
TY-Thank You(no response needed)
LEARN TO MANAGE YOUR E-MAIL OVERLOAD:
hftp://hbswk,hbs.edu/arch've/4438.html
hftp://www.n pr.org/templates/story/stocy.ph p?story Id=4490997
From: Calarco, Pete
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 1:37 PM
To: Troester, Steve; Jolliffe, Stacey
Cc: Snellings, Tim; Thistlethwaite, Charles
Subject: Lorenz pre-development
Steve, I spoke with Judy at Curt's office regarding his meeting request. She indicated that he will not likely be
available until next week. Another related issue was that the applicant was under the understanding that we were
not going to deposit her check and when she was balancing her checkbook, she noticed the check has been
deposited.
It turns out that Stu has some background information on this property. You had wondered why this and the
parcel to the south is a pocket of SR-1. Stu says that there had been an approved tentative subdivision with 9
lots on the two parcels with a cul-de-sac running down the middle. This was approved when the D2N Plan was in
process. At the time of the Plan adoption, this property had an approved tentative map on it. For this reason, the
property was zoned with SR-1 to account for the map. The applicants did not final the map and it expired.
think as submitted, there is no much value in conducting pre-development review. However, if they augment
9/17/2007
Page 2 of 2
itheir application showing proposed house locations, locations of all adjacent houses/structures and a proposal for
a reduced buffer distance including a buffer strategy that will give us more information so that they can get
additional feedback to include in the Map application if they choose to file one. All disclaimers apply—this does
not mean that we necessarily endorse this approach, does not guarantee approval, does not guarantee
recommendation of approval, does not guarantee that there are not other issues. They would be blazing the trail
of buffer guidelines. Your thoughts? --pete
9/17/2007
Page 1 of 2
r
Troester, Steve
From: John Hanley Uhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 2:58 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: RE: Lorenz Pre-development application
Steve,
I'm printing the materials you sent me right now. I appreciate your help. I'll be in touch after I've spoken to the
Lorenz'.
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
From: Troester, Steve [mailto:Stroester@buttecounty.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 2:24 PM
To: John Hanley
Subject: RE: Lorenz Pre-development application
John,
Thanks for speaking with me about this PRED. application. Attached please find the design features materials
that I promised. Hopefully you will find some of these to be useful in this map. As we discussed, the primary
concerns that might be attenuated to some degree by buffer design features are dust, noise, spray drift, visual
screening, and trespass fencing.
We will wait for you final submittal before agendizing this PRED application for the Inter-Departmental Review
Committee.
Thanks!
Steve Troester, Senior Planner(538-7153)
From: John Hanley [mailto:jhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 1:39 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Cc: Denise Lorenz
Subject: Lorenz Pre-development application
Steve,
The Lorenz' have decided to move forward with their application. When can they expect to meet with the County
regarding the project?
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
9/13/2007
Page 2 of 2
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
9/13/2007
Page 1 of 1
Troester, Steve
From: Troester, Steve
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 1:49 PM
To: 'John Hanley'
Subject: RE: Lorenz PD
Attachments: Cooper TPM Plat.pdf; PW Condit. TPM07-0011 REV_5-30-07.pdf; R&D Off-sites_7-16-07.pdf;
Description from Applicant 4-30-07.doc; Incomplete TPM 07-0011 Cooper 5-29-07.pdf
John,
Here you go.
P.S. my dad's name is Lowell and my youngest son's middle name is Lowell.
Steve
From: John Hanley [mailto:jhanley@northstareng.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 11:49 AM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: Lorenz PD
Steve,
I heard a rumor the parcel directly south of the Lorenz piece has submitted a parcel map application with the
County. If said rumor is true, what are the chances of getting an 8.5 x 11 of the TPM for review?
John Lowell Hanley
NorthStar Engineering
111 Mission Ranch Blvd,Ste.100
Chico,CA 95926
(530)893-1600 ext.221
Fax(530)893-2113
www.northstareng.com
9/14/2007
moo; y�
` , ', -.
��,
�,
r � �
.( � �
a '
� . �
. .. � i ..
NorthS ar COUNTY
ENGIN E E_R_I_NG NOV 1 3 200,
7
Givil Engineers-Planners•Surveyors DEVELOPMENT
�_ L SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO: FROM:
Steve Troester John Lowell Hanley,
COMPANY: DATE:
Butte County Development Services 11/12/2007
ADDRESS: JOB NUMBER.-
7
UMBER7 County Center Drive 9541
Oroville,CA 95965
TRANSMITTING THE FOLLOWING:
Ag Buffer plan/ supplemental drawing
PROJECT:
Lorenz pre-development meeting
❑FOR APPROVAL❑FOR INFORMATION ❑FOR CHECKING Lel FOIR PROCESSING ❑ FOR YOUR FILES
❑PLEASE REVIEW&COMMENT ❑PLEASE REPLY ❑ AS REQUESTED
NOTES/COMMENTS:
Steve, 1�
I've included si<Zopies of the Agricultural Buffering Plan as prepared by Tom H Phelps,
ASIA This should become part of the Pre-development application package submitted on July
11,2007. Per your advice,we delayed the processing of said application until an Ag Plan could be
completed Now that all the pieces are in place,we empower you to schedule a meeting as soon
as possible s•we may move forward with said d arnc�aa�n. We lc
ok forward to meeting with you
and the County regarding this subject. Should you require any additional information for this
meeting,please feel free to contact me.
Regards,
��Jo:Lowell Hanley
111 MISSION RANCH BLVD.,SUITE 100
CHICO,CALIFORNIA 95926
530-893-1600
r
FAX-893-2113
a
a
tte L'ount
LAND OFNATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
OFFICES OF AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES
316 NELSON AVENUE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3318
AGRICULTURAL DEPT.: OFFICE:(530)538-7381 FAX:(530)538-7594
RICHARD B.PRICE LOUIE B.MENDOZA,JR.
Agricultural Commissioner Assistant Agricultural Commissioner/
November 28, 2007 Director of Weights and Measures Weights and Measures
To: Steve Troester, Senior Planner, Dept. of Development Services
From: Robert Hill, Deputy Ag Comm., Dept. of Agriculture
Subject: Lorenz PRED 07-05
In Reponses to your request for consultation Pursuant to Butte County Code 24-286
(Ord 3953) on the finding of Unusual Circumstances, regarding the Lorenz PRED 07-05:
In that, the parcel does abut OFC designated land the 300ft Agricultural Buffer setback is
applicable to parcel 040-180-051.
In review of the existing conditions of the parcel for Unusual Circumstances, the following are
the finding of the Agricultural Department.
• The parcel to be divided is located almost entirely in the prescribed buffer area of.the
Durham community boundary.
• The parcel is not of a peculiar size or shape.
• The parcel is not seriously or significantly impacted by residential development.
• There are no obvious seriously or significantly infrastructural issues.
• There are no peculiar natural features or topography.
• There are no other obvious, compelling or peculiar circumstances that justify an
Unusual Circumstances finding by the Agricultural Department.
Subdivision of this parcel will not contribute to the conservation or stability of adjacent
agricultural land use and diminishes the concept of land use transitions, setbacks and buffers
between urban development and agricultural use in order to reduce conflicts.
Subdivision of this parcel will likely result in modification to adjacent agricultural practices.
.A:=ricultural Commissioner Review for Consultation:
For Discretionary Projects, new land divisions, Ag Element 2.2 Buffer issues
Project V 07'CC— Parcel,No. D qC:>—G ASO-�l
BC(.' 24-285(Ord No.3953) Finding of Applicability:
ltei ,(h) Applicability.
OFC/GOI.,adjoining or abut?
Abut city community boundary? or Sphere of influence Yes/No
If Yes to any one of the above, the 300ft Agricultural Buffer is applicable and its
placement location is prescribed in Item (b).
Agricultural Commissioner Finding of Unusual Circumstance:
Y,/ Vill the proposed parcels support the prescribed buffer?Yes No
If Yes, The Buffer must be annotated on the map and its placement location is
prescribed in Item(b).
If No,
Item c1 a Standards_ Residential, Setback:.
.V,*,-(claLS�tback: (5u1>Sec.(d)) are there preexisting Unusual Circumstance''Yes No
If Yes.
Itemci b)..Alternatives to the.btiffer:
Alternative(c1bl): close proximity construction proposed or,
Alternative(cIb2): insufficient size and shape, infrastructure and topography and
(sub Sec.(d))"Providing that adjustment would not result in.
modification to adjacent agricultural practices."
V/1t: No,
Seib Sec.(d) The Planning Director shell evaluate using criteria: Sub Sec.(d) 1-5
"Providing that adjustment would not result in modification to adjacent
agricultural practices."
Pagel of 2
Troester, Steve
From: Loushine, Tom
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 11:30 AM
To: Troester, Steve
Cc: Fogel, Doug
Subject: RE: Lorenz PRIED 07-005
Hi Steve:
This division will require that the proposed new parcels are able to prove that they have usable sewage disposal
area (USDA), adequate to meet the requirements of Appendix VII of the Improvement Standards. Initially we
would call for profile holes to examine the soil layers. Findings from the soil profile holes will further indicate
whether ground water monitoring is required, though it is expected that the soils at this location are adequately
drained, such that there will not be evidence to justify monitoring. PercolEtion testing may be required, though
conservatively high percolation rates may be assumed if Appendix VII requirements can still be met. The
applicant's consultant will be expected to indicate the areas on the map in each parcel that meet the
requirements. Proof of water will not be required at this location.
7O�c.GOLrS�iZHe, REHS
Division of Environmental Health
530.538-5319
Fax 530.538-5339
From: Troester, Steve
Sent: November 29, 2007 8:11 AM
To: Schroth, Eric; Edell, Stuart; Fogel, Doug; Read, Darren; Betts, Steve; Hill, Rob; Price, Richard
Cc: Thistlethwaite, Charles; Jolliffe, Stacey; Calarco, Pete
Subject: Lorenz PRED 07-005
IDR Members,
Regarding: Lorenz PRIED 07-005 (north side of Durham)
In our memo to you requesting your assessment and comments of this conceptual project for Pre-Development
Conference, under the heading of Project Description I stated,
"Staff did not find any unusual circumstances to support the reduction or waiver of the ag buffer."
This comment reflected our initial assessment of the project when it was first submitted back on July 11, 2007.
Given the detailed buffer design features that the applicant now proposes, we feel that the project now should be
assessed for consideration of"unusual circumstances" under the process detailed in Ordinance 3953.
Just a reminder, the Inter-Departmental Review (IDR) meeting for this project is scheduled for December 12. We
are requesting that you provide us with your comments by Wednesday December 5 (one week in advance
of the conference) so that we can forward these to the applicant in advance of the meeting. We believe that this
procedure will be a more productive process for the applicant, allowing them and their representatives to consider
responses and alternatives to concerns regarding their conceptual project.
Thanks much!
12/4/2007
BUTTE COUNTY
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
APPLICANT: LORENZ, GERALD DATE: 7/11/2007
AGENT: <undefined value> APN: 040-180-051
FILE #: PRED07-0005 PLANNER: Steve Troester
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pre-development conference for proposal to subdivide a 5 acre
lot into four parcels on Jones Avenue. The property is adjacent to the north Durham green
line and OFC-designated land that appears to be in active agricultural operation, according
to the application. 300' ag buffer applies. The 5 acre property is just 292' wide. The ag
buffer would need to be substantially reduced or waived entirely in order to approve the
map. Staff did not find any unusual circumstances to support the reduction or waiver of the
ag buffer.
A. STREETS
® 1. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, provide a fully executed road
maintenance agreement for all non-publicly maintained access roads on the County approved form.
A note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or
on an additional map sheet of the Parcel Map stating: "In accordance with Civil Code Section 845,
maintenance of the road as shown hereon shall be shared by those properties with a legal interest in
it."
® 2. All access rights shall be reserved by deed per County Ordinance, offered for dedication, and
depicted on the Parcel Map. Place the following note on the Parcel Map: "gmroved road name is a
non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress, road and public services purposes, to be reserved in
deeds and is hereby offered for dedication to the County of Butte."
❑ 3. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map,demonstrate to the Department of Public Works that there
is approved access conforming to County Code to each parcel from a publicly maintained road.
❑ 4. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, Deed to Butte County in fee simple
feet of right-of-way from the centerline of I along the entire property frontage. The right-of-way
shall be sufficient for the installation of Improvement Standard No. S-5 at all street intersections.
❑ 5. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, relinquish abutter's rights of access
to Butte County along the I frontage of parcels 11 except at approved access points.
® 6. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map,provide street name signs per requirements of the Department
of Public Works. Street names shall be reviewed by the County Address Coordinator and one name
for each new street shall be recommended to the Board of Supervisors for approval prior to
recordation of the Parcel Map. A minimum of five alternate names for each new street shall be
submitted.
® 7. Prior to final road inspection, install all necessary traffic safety signs including stop signs. For all
non-publicly maintained access roads, a note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be
recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet of the Parcel Map stating: "No
public entity shall be responsible for the maintenance of the traffic safety signs including stop signs.
In accordance with Civil Code Section 845,maintenance of the traffic safety signs shall be shared by
those properties with a legal interest in them."
® 8. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, obtain an encroachment permit and improve all new and
existing driveway approaches to publicly maintained roads as specified in the County Improvement
Standards and the terms of the encroachment permit.
® 9. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map, obtain an encroachment permit and construct a standard
S-18B road approach in accordance with County Improve_nent Standards. Adequate sight distance
at the intersection of access road and Jones Avenue shall.be provided. Right-of-way required for
construction of road approach and roadside drainage shall be provided.
® 10. Provide a cul-de-sac designed and constructed as specified in the County Improvement Standards.
The Parcel Map shall show the cul-de-sac.
❑ 11. Prior to the recordation of the Final map, construct or provide a performance bond and labor and
material bond for the construction of a 1/2+12' / full street section on I to an RS-1 geometric
standard. Minimum structural section to be I" AC, I" AB, prime coat, fog seal and 95 % relative
compaction. Submit design to Land Development Division for approval prior to construction. "R"
value determination and other data may be required to support the section design. Form a Zone of
Benefit or other approved maintenance entity within the county's Permanent Road Division for
operation and maintenance of interior street and storm drain facilities.
❑ 12. Prior to the recordation of the Final map, construct or provide a performance bond and labor and
material bond for the construction of a '/2+ 12'/full street section on I to an RSJ road standard with
curb, gutter, and sidewalk, I" AC, I" AB, prime coat, fog seal and 95 % relative compaction.
Construct a'/2+ 12' /full street section on I to an RSJ road.standard with I curb,gutter,and sidewalk,
" AC, 1" AB, prime coat, fog seal and 95 % relative compaction. Submit design to Land
Development Division for approval prior to construction. "R" value determination and other data
may be required to support the section design. Form a Zone of Benefit or other approved
maintenance entity within the county's Permanent Road Division for operation and maintenance of
interior street and storm drain facilities.
® 13. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, provide approved access to each parcel from a County
maintained road or from a state highway. Improve parcel cccess road to parcel being divided to RS-
8 LD-IV County Improvement Standard. Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of
Public Works for plan checking and approval prior to construction.
❑ 14. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, submit road and drainage improvement plans for the
installation and construction of the street frontage improvements on I to I County Improvement
Standards. Improve parcel I frontage to a ''/z+ 12' /full street section on I to an RSJ road standard
including, but not limited to curb, gutter and sidewalk for parcels with gross acreage of one acre or
less. Construct or provide a performance bond and labor and material bond for the construction
prior to recordation of the Parcel Map.
❑ 15. Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte County requirements,accepted design
criteria,and recommendations of Pacific Gas&Electric Company. Where the County has
determined that it is not detrimental to health and safety,the developer may choose to only install
electrical outlets for streetlights. If streetlights are to be installed,the annual energy costs shall be
funded through a County Service Area(CSA),Zone of Benefit within a Permanent Road Division
(PRD),or other entity as approved by the Public Works Director. The developer must complete the
formation of the CSA,Zone of Benefit within a PRD,or other approved entity prior to recordation of
the Final Map. The formation process will require the developer to fund the service until the
beginning of the first fiscal year in which service charges can be collected and to agree to an annual
maximum service charge to ensure continued operation of t-le facilities.
❑ 16. Construct access to lot I per Butte County Code 20-136. Submit design to the Department of Public
Works for review and approval prior to construction. Provide a fully executed road maintenance
agreement for all non-publicly maintained access roads on the County approved form. A note shall
be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an
additional map sheet of the Parcel Map stating: "In accordance with Civil Code Section 845,
maintenance of the access road as shown hereon shall be shared by those properties with a legal
interest in it."
❑ 17. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, construct or provide a performance bond and labor and
material bond for the construction of a landscaping strip within the public right-of-way adjacent to
parcels 1.* Submit design to Land Development Division for approval prior to construction. The
Developer must complete the formation of a County Service Area(CSA), Zone of Benefit within a
Permanent Road Division(PRD),or other Department of Public Works approved maintenance entity
for landscaping prior to recordation of the Final Map. The formation process will require the
Developer to fund the service until the beginning of the first fiscal year in which service charges can
be collected for the maintenance entity and agree to an annual maximum service charge to ensure
continued maintenance of the facilities.
B. DRAINAGE
®
I. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, a plan for a permanent solution for drainage shall be
submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall detail
existing drainage conditions and shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained or retained
onsite and/or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and
shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. If
storm drainage facilities serve new public roads, the developer must complete the formation of a
County Service Area (CSA), Zone of Benefit within a Permanent Road Division (PRD), or other
Department of Public Works approved entity prior to recordation of the Final Map. The formation
process will require the Developer to fund the service until the beginning of the first fiscal year in
which service charges can be collected and agree to an annual maximum service charge to ensure
continued operation of the facilities.
® 2. Prior to final improvement inspection by the Department of Public Works, all new drain inlets shall
be labeled with the county approved drain marker per County Standard S-40. Improvement plans
shall show and/or note the requirements for labeling inlets pursuant to Butte County Standard S-40.
® 3. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, establish 100 year flood plain elevations and the lowest floor
elevations for any structures, in accordance with Butte County Code §26-25. Show on the additional
map sheet the elevations(by contours)and the location of an accepted NGVD29(National Geodetic
Vertical Datum of 1929)benchmark and a temporary benchmark on-site.
❑ 4. Prior to, or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel.Map, pay the applicable drainage fees in
effect at the time of recordation of the Parcel Map for the I drainage area. (The current fee is now$
/acre.)
® 5. Prior to grading, a Construction Storm Water Permit will be required by the State Water Resources
Control Board if the project results in a disturbance (including clearing, excavation, filling, and
grading)of one or more acres. The Permit must be obtained from the State Water Resources Control
Board prior to construction. If a Construction Storm Water Permit is required, place a note on an
additional map sheet that states: "The development of this Parcel Map required a construction storm
water permit. Construction activities that result in a land disturbance of less than one acre, but which
are part of a larger common plan of development, also require a permit. Development of individual
lots may require an additional permit(s)."
C. PARCEL MAP
® 1. Show all easements of record on the Parcel Map.
® 2. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, pay in full any and all delinquent,
current and estimated taxes and assessments as specified in Article 8 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of
Title 7,of the California Government Code commencing with Section 66492.
® 3. Pay the recording fees in effect at the time the Parcel Map and related documents are recorded.
❑ 4. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, pay all applicable assessments
established by affected assessment districts, in full.
❑ 5. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an
additional map sheet of the Parcel Map regarding 1.
BUTTE COUNTY
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
APPLICANT: LORENZ, GERALD DATE: 7/11/2007
AGENT: <undefined value> APN: 040-180-051
FILE #: PRED07-0005 PLANNER: Steve Troester
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pre-development conference for proposal to subdivide a 5
acre lot into four parcels on Jones Avenue. The property is adjacent to the north Durham
green line and OFC-designated land that appears to be in active agricultural operation,
according to the application. 300' ag buffer applies. The 5 acre property is just 292' wide.
The ag buffer would need to be substantially reduced or waived entirely in order to
approve the map. Staff did not find any unusual circumstances to support the reduction or
waiver of the ag buffer.
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
PLEASE CONTACT THE BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS:
S. FIRE CLEARANCE
❑ 1. Construction, installation or development of buildings and/or roads, driveways,
gates and bridges on parcels/lots shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe
Regulations—Public Resources Code 4290, 4291 and current Butte County
Improvement Standards, whichever is stricter.
❑ 2. Prior to construction, a pressurized community water system for fire protection is
required. Bonding may be allowed with the approval of the County Fire Chief.
Average required hydrant spacing is feet, hydrant size inches, and
residual fire flow of GPM. Fire hydrant identification, road reflectors
or post reflectors acceptable to the County Fire Chief shall be installed or bonded,
prior to Parcel or Final map recordation. Submit plans to the Fire Department for
review and approval prior to construction.
X 3. Place a note on a separate document and recorded concurrently with the Parcel,
Final map or an additional map sheet stating that "Fire suppression sprinkler
systems shall be installed in all new residential dwellings in accordance with
NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurized community water system with hydrants
that meet Fire Department specifications serves the property." A note stating
j "Automatic Fire Sprinklers conforming to NFPA Standard 13D required" is to be
added to all affected building plans.
❑ 4. In lieu of hydrant installation, prior to recordation of the Parcel or Final map,
payment shall be made into the hycrant fund at the current rate per
lineal foot of street frontage.
X 5. Prior to building construction, provide an all weather access of at least 10 feet
wide and vertical clearance of 15 feet that will allow for ingress and egress and
accommodate a 40,000-pound fire apparatus to within 150 feet of all structures.
I
r
❑ 6. Place a note on a separate document,which is to be recorded concurrently with the Parcel
or Final map, or on an additional map sheet stating, "Building identification and/or
addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290 and shall
be posted at the time of permit issuance and maintair_ed continuously thereafter.
i
t
Page 1 of 2
1
Troester, Steve
From: Troester, Steve
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 4:38 PM
To: Hill, Rob
Cc: Price, Richard
Subject: RE: Lorenz PRED 07-005
Attachments: LORENZ PRED07-0005 REVISED PROJECT PACKET 11-21-07 .pdf; Agr. Comm.
Comment_12-05-07.htm; lorenz Ag comments1_11-28-07.rtf
Rob & Richard,
Stacey tells me that you may not have received a complete or accurate IDR comments request packet. Attached
is what I believe to be the full packet. Included on pages 27 and 28 of the attached provide pretty extensive buffer
design features. The applicant has expressed that they are anxious to work with the Agricultural Commissioner
and Development Services to arrive at buffer design features that address the concerns to the greatest extent
possible.
See you at IDR tomorrow.
Steve
From: Hill, Rob
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 4:28 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Subject: RE: Lorenz PRED 07-005
Here's mine Steve,
The evaluation form is also attached.
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: Troester, Steve
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:11 AM
To: Schroth, Eric; Edell, Stuart; Fogel, Doug; Read, Darren; Betts, Steve; Hill, Rob; Price, Richard
Cc: Thistlethwaite, Charles; Jolliffe, Stacey; Calarco, Pete
Subject: Lorenz PRED 07-005
IDR Members,
Regarding: Lorenz PRED 07-005 (north side of Durham)
In our memo to you requesting your assessment and comments of this conceptual project for Pre-
Development Conference, under the heading of Project Description I stated,
"Staff did not find any unusual circumstances to support the reduction or waiver of the ag
buffer."
This comment reflected our initial assessment of the project when it was first submitted back on July 11,
2007. Given the detailed buffer design features that the applicant now proposes, we feel that the project
now should be assessed for consideration of"unusual circumstar:ces" under the process detailed in
Ordinance 3953.
12/4/2007
Page 2 of 2
Just a reminder, the Inter-Departmental Review(IDR) meeting for this project is scheduled for December
12. We are requesting that you provide us with your comments by Wednesday December 5 (one
week in advance of the conference) so that we can forward these to the applicant in advance of the
meeting. We believe that this procedure will be a more productive process for the applicant, allowing
them and their representatives to consider responses and alternatives to concerns regarding their
conceptual project.
Thanks much!
Steve Troester, Senior Planner
Butte County Dept. of Development Services
#7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA, 95965
(530) 538-7153
i
1
12/4/2007
:r
Clear Day Page 1 of 2
Troester, Steve
From: Price, Richard
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 4:13 PM
To: Troester, Steve
Cc: Hill, Rob `
Subject: FW: APPROVED IDR AGENDA FOR 12/5/2007
Attachments: 120507.pdf; Clear Day Bkgrd.JPG
Steve-
Please note that those"unusual circumstances"found for Lorenz may still not be found to be adequate under
our mitigation concerns to address surrounding area with existing or potential agricultural practices allowed in
an A zone. We have not yet commented on any proposed "final' design. We will see that at the pre-development
conference?We understand that Tim needs to make a"finding" and then we comment on that"finding" under
theP rovisions of the new ordinance.
Richard B. Price
Butte County Agricultural Commissioner
316 Nelson Ave.
Oroville,CA 95965
530-538-7381
From: Upton,Tiffany
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:12 PM
To: Aguila, Michelle; amcgreehan@TownofParadise.com; Bailey, Blake; Banner, Brad; Betts, Steve; Bonham,
Tina; Breedon, Dan; Brown, Alan; Calarco, Pete; Castanon, Yvette; Cochran, Ada; Damon, Matt; Durling, Carl;
Edell, Stuart; Fogel, Doug; Gillis, Kathy; Glaze, Mike; haslemfk@cityoforoville.org; Hill, Rob; Jolliffe, Stacey;
Kirk, Maureen; Loker, Sally; Lucas, Steve; Mann, Cyndi; Mannel, Kevin; McCracken, Shari; McMillan, Kim;
Mefford, Alice; Michelena, Mark; Nelson, Carl; Price, Richard; Quigley, C.; rbruun@dhs.ca.gov; Read, Darren;
Reimers, Ken; rhinrich@dhs.ca.gov; Schroth, Eric; Severin, Vance; Snellings, Tim; Sousa, Ray; Thistlethwaite,
Charles; Thomas, Chris; Tolley, Chris; Troester, Steve; Wolfe, Mark
Subject: APPROVED IDR AGENDA FOR 12/5/2007
Good Afternoon,
Attached is the Approved IDR Agenda for 12/5/2007. Please let me know if you have any
questions.
Thank you,
12/4/2007
Clear Day Page 2 of 2
Tiffany Upton
Department of Development Services
Office Specialist Sr.
Phone: 538-5260
Fax: 538-7785
12/4/2007
r
BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
' { 1453 Downer Street, Suite C o Oroville, California 95965-4950
[� (530)538-7784 o Fax (530)538-2847 o www.buttelafco.org
GlrE � PO`
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Troester, Associate Planner, Butte County Planning Division
FROM: Stephen Betts, Principal Planner(x 715 1)
SUBJECT: PRED 07-0005 —Gerald Lorenz, APN 040-180-051
DATE: December 7, 2007
The subject parcel is located within the boundaries of the following local agencies (Tax Rate
Area 070-002):
1. Durham Mosquito and Vector Control District
2. Durham Recreation and Park District
3. Durham Unified School District
4. Butte Community College District
5. CSA No. 164 (Animal Control)
6. Butte County Resource Conservation District
Please note that LAFCo mapping shows that this parcel is located within the Durham
Irrigation District(which provides domestic water), although TRA 070-002 does not show
that this parcel is within the district. If the project proposes to obtain domestic water from
the Durham Irrigation District this issue will need to be resolved to ensure that the parcels
are taxed accordingly.
NOTE: 1. PLEASE DIRECT TO LAFCo A COPY OF THE ADVISORY
AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE AND STAFF REPORT FOR THIS
PROJECT WHEN COMPLETED.
2. PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15073,PLEASE
PROVIDE TO LAFCo AS AN ANTICIPATED RESPONSIBLE AGENCY,
THE NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
WITH A COPY OF THE PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
INITIAL STUDY ATTACHED.
3. PLEASE ENSURE THAT OUR COMMENTS AND CONERNS LISTED
BELOW ARE NOTED AND ADDRESSED IN THE INITIAL STUDY AND
IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT.
Please accept the following comments concerning the above referenced project:
1. If urban type services (e.g. landscaping, drainage, fire protection, etc.) for the new
development are proposed to be provided through annexation to an existing local agency
Steve Troester
December 7,2007
Page 2 of 3
or by a formation of a new local agency, such as a county service area(CSA) or a
community service district(CSD), the initial study needs to identify exactly what type of
mechanism will be utilized. Such specificity is needed in order to allow for a complete
and meaningful analysis of the project.
LAFCo as the authorizing agency for an annexation or formation should be consulted
early to allow for a meaningful analysis of the issue prior to County consideration of the
development application. This early coordination will allow for the anticipated LAFCo
action to be fully integrated into the project review process and should result in the
proposal being:
A. Fully described in the project description; and
B. Fully addressed in the appropriate environmental documents; and
C. Circulated to LAFCo for review as an agency with an approval role; and
D. Fully integrated into the public hearing process.
The absence of this early coordination and failure to address the LAFCo related issues as
described will require additional environmental review and related studies at such time
an annexation/formation is requested resulting in unnecessary costs and delays. It
should be understood that such a request would be reviewed based on state law and local
LAFCo policies which are clearly directed at maximizing service efficiencies,
minimizing the creation of new governmental entities, limiting urban sprawl and
directing new development to areas with existing urban service providers.
If the County proposes to create a new County Service Area/Community Service District
to provide services to the project, a Municipal Service Review (MSR) and Plan for
Services for the CSA/CSD would need to be prepared by the County and reviewed and
approved by LAFCo. The MSR would be used to determine what type of services the
CSA/CSD is expected to provide and the extent to which it is expected to do so. As an
alternative to a CSA/CSD, the County could form a Landscaping and Lighting District or
a Benefit Assessment District to provide urban services to the project. These types of
districts do not require LAFCo review or approval.
2. The project site abuts parcels that are designated as Orchard and Field Crops. The project
has the potential to cause significant impacts to agricultural uses, including the
conversion of prime agricultural lands, which needs to be thoroughly addressed in the
initial study for the project.
3. If any LAFCo action is required,pursuant to Butte LAFCo Policy 2.13.4. in making the
determination whether conversion will adversely impact adjoining prime agricultural,
LAFCo will consider the following factors:
a. The agricultural/open space significance of the subject and adjacent areas relative
to other agricultural/open space lands in the region;
b. The use of the subject and the adjacent areas;
Steve Troester
December 7,2007
Page 3 of 3
I
c. Whether public facilities related to the proposal would be sized or situated so as to
facilitate the conversion of adjacent or nearby agricultural/open space land, or will
be extended through or adjacent to any other agrizultural/open space lands which
lie between the project site and existing facilities;
d. Whether natural or man-made barriers serve to buffer adjacent or nearby
agricultural/open space land from the effects of the proposed development; and,
e. Applicable provisions of the County's General Plan Agricultural Element, Open
Space and Land Use Elements, applicable growth-management policies, or other
i
statutory provisions designed to protect agriculture or open space.
4. Continued divisions of unincorporated parcels for large lot residential development
within, or adjacent to, existing City's Sphere of Influence or established communities
such as Durham, does not facilitate the creation of a compact urban form, maximize the
use scarce available residential lands or result in the efficient provision of urban type
services. These are fundamental issues to LAFCo pursuant to Government Code Section
56000 and will be of consequence if any LAFCo action should be required.
If you have any questions concerning these comments,please contact our office at your
convenience.
Lorenz PRED:
x
i
i
i
1
1 PUD Approved 12-9-97
A-10 1
1 _ ----
OFC 1 040-180-021 -- -------- --------- -
� i
AR
040-180-051
SR-1
300' Buffer AR� ��
i 040-180-052
Li i i
Jones Ave CooperTPMV-0011
i Durham-Dayton Hwy
�� it
10 PUD Approved 12-397
OFC 06p-180-021
040.180.081 SR_i v v
300'Buffer AR 1
040.180-052 v
Jones Ave
1 H
1t.
Durham-Do on
AR
5A
�= rMINE
Lorenz
Il 71,P4R, .% �_0 9 282' 1, 1
IS R-1
P 1../D
on
,•t. .r=d ee—�� y� 1�� ] �`, d 1 � `r-� yl i ,r�„, ,� �...I� 1 ,�'"� ; L ``1�NL.—�'�r
'�• �+�:.L.w�!'ti� `� s l � � � '�.. _ �, - _ ��� �1r it
.A Jones Ave _ _ -
.' } '�
L� � "
�'� Z .�j` n.t�i- �..-+r"� ��G+- �- a.-ii• ® 7 1 1'
+,ylA_5 '�± •� t + 'S" � �. L V�'.
— ` - - " '• ti,:::. - - Durham-Dayton Hwy r�;, . V
= Existing Home
�.
�,
�+rn .cwr.a s.a.wn..
"�aara•.
:�.� ��
+. „
a
tte
t
�pLAND OFNATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
' J'r PL's
OFFICES OF AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES
316 NELSON AVENUE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3318
AGRICULTURAL DEPT.:: OFFICE:(530)538-7381 FAX:(530)538-7594
RICHARD B.PRICE LOUIE B.MENDO"JR.
Agricultural Commissioner Assistant Agricultural Commissioner/
November 28, 2007 Duector of Weights and Measures Weights and Measures
To: Steve Troester, Senior Planner, Dept. of Development Services
From: Robert Hill, Deputy Ag Comm., Dept. of Agriculture
Subject: Lorenz PRED 07-05
In Reponses to your request for consultation Pursuant to Butte County Code 24-286
(Ord 3953)on the finding of Unusual Circumstances, regarding the Lorenz PRED 07-05:
In that,the parcel does abut OFC designated land the 30OR Agricultural Buffer setback is
applicable to parcel 040-180-051.
In review of the existing conditions of the parcel for Unusual Circumstances, the following are
the finding of the Agricultural Department.
• The parcel to be divided is located almost entirely in the prescribed buffer area of the
Durham community boundary.
• The parcel is not of a peculiar size or shape.
• The parcel is not seriously or significantly impacted by residential development.
• There are no obvious serious or significant infrastructural issues.
• There are no peculiar natural features or topography.
• There are no other obvious, compelling or peculiar circumstances that justify an
Unusual Circumstances finding by the Agricultural Department.
Subdivision of this parcel will not contribute to the conservation or stability of adjacent
agricultural land use and diminishes the concept of land use transitions, setbacks and buffers
between urban development and agricultural use in order to reduce conflicts.
Subdivision of this parcel will likely result in modification to adjacent agricultural practices.
r � I� �
� _ �
:t l t`
.. i
� � � � It � ,
I � � - S
I
�,. N
� T ,r
� � � 1�
. � � 1 � .
� Y • .
K&4 Botanical Name-Common Name
PLANTING GROUP'A'
A Platans ocerlfollo Yarwood'-Landon Plane Tree
B Rosa flower Carpet Nhlte'-Mite Carpet Roses
C Cotonemter parneyl-Parney Cotoneaster
PL ANTIN6 6ROLF 13'
A Zelkovo serrata'Green Vase'-SawleaF Zolkovo
B BeRzrb thnlber Ig I'Crimson Pygmy'-Crimson P4gn1.klpanese Barberry
C Nerlum oleander Lorna'-Dwprf MhRe Oleander
A Shgle row decicLous trees(carntllWpr3)plant 30'an center
I I B Tr�le row trespass inhibiting shrWa(cantWpe),plant 3'on center THOMAS H. PHELPS
I I I C 54g1e row screening shrubs
_ LINDf C1PE LACHITECTDAE
040-180-021 _ _ _
PLANT LEGEND ASD
I1 I I QQt.51ze Key Botanical Nome-common Nome Cagan ib Un&W Wino#4111
TRSS 1418 Aidpbrmk Wry
040-1$0-048 I I �� A A I1r15 PLA. YAR. Plans acerifolio Ycrwood'-Landon Plane Tree aim G 95918
I ��OciQ �\ 60' EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND B G q r15 ZEL. 6RE. zelkovo serrota'Green Vase'-SaWeaF Zelkavo (520)892.8897 fu(S30A92.9S811
30' -I UTILITIES TO BE RESERVED FOR THE 096elp,@,IxglobA t
1k 040-630-009
-.I 30' I 1 BENEFIT OF PARCELS 2, 3 AND _ 255 u5 BER CRI.
1 .fbRO1N' Berberis ter bage'crmon P4gGYnsan Py" tgconese Barberry
-171 05 COT. PAR. yeaster
'A' 51 r5 hER CNerl—oarder tsablmca -
Dwarf hhlte Oleander
I I 5• '0 ^ — — — _ / 466 02 ROS. Fcw Rasa flower Carpet whlte'-Finite Carpet Roses
Lt.Z., i ROTE.
I 1 Construct a 6'high wood fence along property llne adj c nt to agricultural use
LOT 4 1; 11 pLgbTTINe�NOTES
I — —
(TYPICAL) — h 1.11 ACRES NET i
— f— —
1.14 ACRES GROSS;'1 I. Installing Contractor shall verify quantities and areas to be planted prior to start of job.
I Z � Notify Landscape Architect of any discrepancies prior to starting work.
1' -"� 1 `�. 0 2. All planting areas shall be completely free of trash,debris,rocks,and construction
LORENZ I rn LOT 1 1 1 1 LOT 3 1 1 A materials larger than 2",and shall be brought to finish ade before lant begins. Z `lZl
t, 1 LOT 2' 1 0.79'ACRES NET I N -----------------
-_ - ^b 040-630-010 9 P 9
040-180-051 r 1.47 ACRES NET 1 1 0.73 ACRES NET 1 N 1 ,a ---" ro C O Finish grade shall be 2'below surface shall
walks,curbs,and paved areas it planting areas
o I 1.90 ACRES GROSS I I 11.01 ACRES GROSS 1 N �? o where bark Is to be Installed. Grades shall be flush at catch basins. Surfaces shall be W
N 1.01 ACRES GROSS o
5.05± ACRES 0i I ro I ^? 1 I I sl ed with re and to drain a re uirements so that water does not dle or stand.
I 10' BSL oP 9 a h
3. if additional soli Is required,I shall be approved loam as similar to the existing loll � ---�
1 I I I 1 1 1 as possible,free of debris and noxious weeds. Prior to placing additional soil,disc or O
I I 1 I )0 I I 100 1 1 1 scarify the sub grade to o depth of at least 6'to permit bonding to the subgrade. Spread
I 1 I LFSq LFSA 1 I I and rototill a one Inch layer of new son,then proceed to place remaining soil and
1 `' - 1 1 1 1 1 1 ❑ Iestabnsn finish grace.
I I I I 1 I I 20' BSL q, Sall preparation for;}hC1✓12 planting areas. Apply nitrified wood product amendment at a w
II I 1 I I I 1 _ — minlmum rate of 6 cubic yards per 1000 sq.ft.,commercial fertilizer(16-16-I6 NPK or
040-180-049 I %N I I `'`�•� I I ' 1 1 j — — — equal)at a rate of 20 lbs.per 1000 sq.ft.,gypsum at a rate of 100 Ib.per 1000 sq,ft. tu
I/ I ®I I 1 1 I 1 _
J Rototlll to a depth of 6'to 10'. Gornpact and settle all areas .(� to
L 45- Irrigation to a mminum depth of 12'.by application of heavy V 1 \\\///w
to 1 1 �' _J I---- ---45— 170'
_—__ L 45'———^ 150' S. All plants shall be top quality nursery stock,free of disease and Insect pests. Plants
—� — 150 '�� shall be normal size for container,vigorous,and true to name and variety.
I V� — ---298;_ 747.97' I 040-630-011 6. Plant holes shall be the same depth as the root ball,and two times the idth for shrubs ��O// m
I and three times the width for trees. Back Fill for the plant hales shall be existing soil tu
IL
I I N85'44'22"E \� I which has been previously amended. Apply 0smocote Controlled Release Formula fertilizer O
11 (15-6-12,4 month formul per manufacturer's recommendations. 0
/ ----__------ __----_--- ) 1. When planted,crown of plant shall be 1-1/2'above finish grade. Prepare a water basin by
\�\ I forming a loll ring at least 3'high and as wide around the outer edge of the new plant {tr
I``w —_,f:------ _-- — — — _ hole. Water thoroughly to eliminate air pockets. 111 — Q
-- — 5. Upon completion uF pkaltbry all ccotatnerized material,rako all shrub and ground cover areas
I -T ____ to smooth grade,leaving watering basins Intact. Prior to placement of bark mulch,all (�
I W 1 I shrub and ground cover areas shall be treated with a pre-emergent herbicide(Roretor or u X O
I I equal)per manufacturer's directions. �l
Place o al laayyer of shredded cedar bark to all shrub and ground cover areas prior to planting
I of rooted cuttings or 11nens of ground cover plants. O X
n I 10. Rooted cuttings or liners of ground cover shall be planted In straight rows and evenly �l
I I triangular spaced at Intervals noted in plant legend. Plant each rooted plant with its Q '
I z
proportionate amount of rooting soil In a mariner that will insure minimrm disturbance of the Z n/
root system. to f�
I I I II. For trees that require staking,use two 2'diameter treated lodge pole stakes set a mintmumt��
1 of 12'Into undisturbed sub grade below the root boll. Place ties and stakes only to the v u
leve6
I which will hold the tree upright;proper height is "above the point where the tree
L� will snap to an upright position by Itself If the top Is pulled to one side as If wind
I I I I loaded and then released. Tles shall be cinch-tie flexible viyl(or equal)nailed to stake
I _ — with galvanized na11s.
I I I As- PIAN
rootball
I 1 I I amended backfill-water tree ties-cinch tie or equal
O heavily to reduce air pockets tree stakes-2 per treer
040-180-013 I I I soil ring cut to wlthtn 3' per
ties
I w I I soll b
soilil bra
IO I dl only the depth of rootball amended backfill-water
—2 040-180-041 I — 9 y P heavily to reduce olr pockets — —
I I I 2 times width of rootball —dig only the depth of rootboll
1 a u�nf
3 times width of rootboll
ns m rd®
0
Shrub Planting Tree Planting 8 Staking o
o fzo
0
"'P
PLANTING PLAN ffffffrfl "'°"°'
SCALE: I°=ea m�� THP
h•=6o' L 1
so 2a° NORTH n� N oyy of
F
4
_
190-00-0t,0 :Nd'd Jaz. T
d 3 a SNd"Id 3d'd':�SQN'd�
— ZNzINC7 �G I NSC V Q7� �
N� Ii�aE
N1 g
to
JT
Rns as C IL
mS0
"
2$5$$Fo�� °mE ag F� � ma mom-m °o o
oma a � $ 1�m mpmt- g ry;in ig m v 0
m-dam O1a1
m0 m
�$ t� m ,$ am9 �c�j
>�m
o a�°matngo o o� � mm;$oo° aaEammz� > a
a uo` ��$Y S Yam $+ �..� roam _
m ao Vie# 3 g���aza8€3 a�° -m3da �
S a as i y x
ama `ma � ms a �D
�O$am
ji°
aa���
00 _ 8s mam ;$Jima . $��y J myT�• ;JmCg m ammJ
oa-xpp }4X�� mm�oo zm Rm a o mC$°a� m "hb`maa (0
�%s N « Y 9� �Y - Um��m
= ° gym aga� gUs E1sJ�m�$ egg+ $ $
3'imJ$°dsdm�� a$a-$ �mEo
__
d. a r8 a Y oma$-am-a $3aa�a
mm,- o �� �+ _ m Jmfi'aa$�„
m$- g_ ,pv �� m g' ems m o g
�a St—ryry5 a•� JQ
NpmIB�OmT�_mm
r�-a c aN 3m m rywE rsZ_E
ac�d< m$ m$, 5
1S= BSM W F UaUY $� `08 = $ aE
� � r � up
J ��"�Fm -s$a° °3 �'gmm$ 'R� �o�`invy$ppoEim
4 H J ab, -m 9mm a_O c$Om ry- p0 ap� b-
u& p90 Z °y �m -��� m "o-� ° $° gm xaa omo
e s m s c m 9 S mm t m my
3 ` ��$ �-_�°8$�a=" J`�o�€moi ° �Q oo �m a
aoY9 � amu a �Q ��� Pi<t}a _maMa"mm�Emn�s` QaicYsF$3maLLom9°i 9
,I
YI QmJ QmJ pp ..nn
4 Vl
IO
I I I
I I II I
a,
/ I 0 I
I O / M to
M I
I / mI I _
0 o L
T
amo / N04'17'00"W — -
- — — ---- :---292'------ ---
N � Wo ' I
J z 0 11
I
QmJv W V, J
oom
� a I
— �------- 'r-
Ln I
292'- rn
wo a I I
z I b z 0 , - ------ `� I I
os MwN:;, Ip I I
F.WW ,,,1 u-, I I
ui I O Q Q o LL r.\ I uNi
�� OI
v
o
L ��¢ -J i coI
I o
uOn I --292'---(--_-_ i o I a
zwN
r I O
-w� I Wu1 I I O
�. OWE I ZN
rmaa I 1 I ``Nw,n '•�On I I
0 1
0 z raW I�
��o
o Lu
yv, al Ma I I 1
o WFr C ori—oo
�z INr --J I I
toDm :� ----292'--------
_ -----------0 II 11 I
I I I u0 I I I
I
Z
^wcnI w I
00W _ L- N 1
Jra j N a i I
I �C Go I
/ y
I \
s3Nor
— _ - - y n 291N06'34'00"W _ _ _ T - - -
-
0
I N M o II a
Z oa o o
o I � - °° \ I z
O I � I \ L
� I J O � O � L
I Z
O
�O �W
V ^ A
W �
�v
-4,
� Ile�1111 Q �� 5Z ,� V
s° V1 O z ~ W O \
�
� y �
W
° ,a `sr,OQtWyJ
-
li
►�
� YGN o% CG 4�
V dzU M1DyrA u•
41
IS
IQ
ItooW I a o
1 � J
0
SLI C
W � �� I I ►� nW C
I 13 V e v$ �o
f
/ Co>. lsLB rwl•/Lgle (`✓�OJM_YOO.L/otlON �� pV
44
G �. ►� � ^`
1 uW / II I ` ti i
'U'S O
:
'Sj �� � Cr4iH
� v
44 41 M H SII
ZN
•t w QV o
o 164
v V I ro N�
o
�b 3I-7's•c.os 6L ,s/Z6L \\\ --__--`\\\ \\I 1 hoc �
.fs••�� - o�::r !ems F�z-�ti,� � a�
__� ��----- �h,�ol,o6•L�a M„oo,DE.9o�r -------- � I G �o
.5E5 i gid)/8'%!d Cs J 59'97 I, 5:Flfvor
VV W a IN ` ti QII �� I W41
WR
ti
SR
iz
I � .. I .. Qo � W � �� `” v,� Wei°o'• ,,
� KZ`o',
PAlI W
00"IN� J 3�wPWW3w
oar"
/ �WpJ
4
i
�ZoC.N�a �11 �r
z
I °v
aT°mm3�a � /� Ili o
p�ay3cy:�
t.; �o.'z��� � ro°•`� I � IIS ^ Q ~ � O
�D�Q�CZ I lNli �II1 1'1� a �Ow � Q .. '• ��I �V�w
° ;I ✓o&ESA o o
�OE 0
• 2� C t I ———— o tn06.7o'oo'_w e» -
1►!^
Ira r.
rh
?93.64'
m
"Y� •,.� �c � V I II � �+ A
I li v
o �
v a Iy h � v► � ti ^ w � �
�CS
►1
•off";o � � ;� � 1 � � � � N �
ora
NOG°/700"W(of.-) e78.zirMJ 879 '(off
0
� � x
71on
yam
NTtiOti ! � °� Hvan� Nor
Ph
CS
Q� O � Qrb
Q NH V1 OnZ� O
� ; cli
N, a� K
�H
1
11
AlOT5; 744F A101?711 Z 1AY Of ME
(sez-37W-4-4Z) AIM7116r 7112FOMAI
Z Z Or ai c A IV 9_111.Wd
L TAMIC7,Alp 4.
j
NI 00
rit..-- 1 11"
pf
7!91Y.
7?4F.98
0
wit
&MJdA4
Ce F
ml
vv� h` es t F!F NE;r
%
,�:• ?•�`• W`el `. � /
4/ 4
CF.- W.-AdR,zdamve s!ozqz
30 1671FIR RM/.?IV M fir - AWMOdS 1A4PIC4rfD
0 - PO1IVrVereleAlf1NFI9 OIV4C Y
,94/,r,r,f Co. R502 116 A - avrrr CO."ay.WELL
S .94P MDPT, 14
'Pre/('00-Y M,) Q,78 OCAF5 A1467
46 11.52 0_4p', f6.y
4.98 dCRE6: 4MM50
771E AdflIS /S 741E WEST ZlIve
7496, a,-javfv f Pewele II)ejv r/C-4 Z ro 6-9 OA MdAr,
Al e6 1445:1416 7-54;.Oz 14, (&a6-zr4adw)
lk
.a
AI. J. P. jz AMIAILAIMLAllftkl�lh AOL Amk4sib,Amlb�
A 19Z Idedelf(671fass)
F
• A'OR741 I AT OJC 41112111d" 60'PEA
1101M PIF/I I?W.12411?llldmv Ah' // P6 7-Y8
7*V /,a OF 4 PORTION OF 5�EC771041 :70,
'ca
?-5 75 6574. 60 A.7-94/77f CO. 721 &, /?,?E, M 12.M. Al AT
"Olv WR ZIMIX1601WIR07EP .41?Ed OF
506.,60'(A-f) go 7Jrr_ -57'e'O,) �IIA-?rl Z*
)9117TE CO, CGL IF, CO'CISTi
0 /467.9 '19
&:F 146 4f6 11w 55C �l 6 0-�F'.4f4O'4f5 4PV
A017 R A' t3L461A164AM
Sarre co.
MOM iVFZ,4 MON.WELL 0 41AWA M A/ Cv A/W\ ` '�-?GO .�-?G/ .4 Y 'eE
dva,-.�1odv1r,?,� 171Y
lAirAlf Oxclee a,-rAee9e1rr.-caz1ArY1?sca1?-Oe1.-
UVOIFIZ SER144 V41",9,EJ? /-IS'
SURLIf YOR'S CERTIFICATE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S CERRAICA TE rn
�j=
TAI/s"'ap WA SA,?EAd1?eO 9Y.NE Cr/ON_4AID ralS A444/'CONACIRAfS WlAil rVlf 1?4:OUA?EA4EA1rS OF rllf S'418 AIZ EO Y OCOf ; 1984- d7.1--&L�)M.
15,94 6"tlloA,,d-Iezo savvFy/A/ 7xle Imowu— 01VI61CAl Af.4P 4C7�IA/O ZOCdZ ORIVAIWNCE. q00/!I&_Oc Ad�4P 5- dT P4a,-Z:S-, OT 7A(e 1711OVESr OF
AFAIM OF 7 RFF
Frj
IN
Nc
A VE S41,9DIVISIOAl AMPAM7�r
g,
CAI-40egfr 7 197-q-, 1A1eqE.9Y Y-14-SO �m,
57r,dr. ZVWT-�-Wf p
P�V, 7AIAVO 4, 4*ldf
OF7PE4OCZZ.4aEVCYAdVE BEEN COAM,/I: .4,V "A Md
M '01?A,f!5 7V 77YEOPPROVE.0 Ae:,VTd 71 "A-11
W /0,50, assocldles
/10 V4 Z 7A(E/?E`Oc WA(ICA I WER E I P W,C// MIC41"IIIAIZ t F,9,j:2/0 4 1 rO r1l E CIdl?le'A AI.CZSOAI S
IlllAf6 OF rl.IE 1_7.d17CE4 Af4P. CO&A17Y lm,-ol?l I
A Vt .;-" e�=�� A 0. hOX 1676 017091LIE,CR.95965
_V2 ZZ, CLOY 13E,717Y "IZCIF 14lfF?-4-- 5ERI41 Al2 gy(�,-,�' 719-010
-TeAWR Zf agor C04IA17Y S41RVEYO,? OF12417Y Ph.(916) 534-1111
-Iva
Key Botonlcol flame-Canrnon Kane
PLANTING 6R012P'A'
A Plutons acertolla Yorwood'-London Plate Tree
B Rasa Flower Carpet Mile'-Mhite Corpet Roses
C. Gotoneaster pernayl-Porney eotoneaster
PLANTING 6ROLP W
A Zelkova serrata'6reen Vose'-5a leaf Zelkova
B Berberb tau iter lq 1'Crimson Pygny'-6rin son Pygmy Japanese Barberry
c Nerl-oleander lama'-Dwarf hate OI
II ASingle row decid o s trees(conttrluws)plats 3o'an center
B Tr�1e row trespass Inhibiting shrubs(cort0noan
us),plant 5'on center THOMAS H. PHELPS
040-180-021 a Single row screening shvbs
_ LAN DSC1PE ARCH ITE(TUIE
PLANT LEGEND ASIA
I 1 I i
ON•51ze BOtori al Nome-common Name Cafdomi.Iu&W Rrdina 81127
040-180-048 ` A A TRIS 1178 8i8Drbrmk w.7
\ 11 al5 PLA. YAR Plotar s acerlfol]a Ycr,.rood'-London Plane Tree Dim.U 95928
30' �O�P \� 60' EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND B G `-
9 ul5 ZEL. 6RE. zelkova serrata'6reen Vase -SawleaF zelkovo (S70)8924897 In(S20)892-9588
UTILITIES TO BE RESERVED FOR THE dy8rb orb 8lnbilnec
\F 1 040-630-009
-�30'I 1 BENEFIT OF PARCELS 2. 3 AND 25505 BER eRl. Berberls thfbp �errsil c �
roan P lianacrimson'- Fygry Japanese Barberry
I i I _ r6RO11P'A 51 05 NER CA5. Nerhxn oleefader'GasoblarcaAarrff Mite OlearWer
/ cJ• 'Q _ Lb u2 R015. FGW Roso Flower Carpet Mile'-Mite Carpet Roses
Lr
_ I / construct a Which wood fence along property Ilro adjacent to agrlcultu-ol use
zo2' o LOT 4 `// / PLANTING NOTES
(TYPICAL) — r — h ( 1.11 ACRES NET i
— -1 I. Install Contractor shall verifyquantities and areas to be planted for to start of ob.
I Z _ _ - - - - -1 r - 1 I I 1.14 ACRES GROSS/i Z �/ Notify Lie Architect of ndiscrepancies prior to sting work-
,
ork j
V!
— — I 1 ,„s='j f I .I o / 2. All planting areas shall be completely free of trash,debris,rocks,and construction N
LORENZ rn LOT 1 I I I 1 LOT 3 1`•.. 1 ? materials larger than 2',and shat be brought to finish ode before land be Ire. N Z
L4
1.47 ACRES NET I 1 LOT 2,” 1 0.79'ACRES NET 1 N _______ N 040-630-010 g O1� `� P beg
bid.
0.73 ACRES NET I N I ro �!O Finish grade shall be 2'below surface of walks,curbs,and paved areas In planting areas ,'e
0 I 1.90 ACRES GROSS I I I 1.01 ACRES GROSS 1 N �? o where bark Is to be Installed. Grades shat be flush at catch bastns. Surfaces shall be to d
N 1.01 ACRES GROSS o
5.05± ACRES 1 rn 1 ^� 1 1 10' BSL I sloped with regard to drainage requirements so that water does not puddle or stand. ^,
N i II I r� i ,./ j 3. If additional soil Is required,It shall be approved loam as similar to the existing 5011
as possible,free of debris and noxious weeds. Prior to placing additional soil,disc or as-
I0 0' I I _ 1 scarifythe sub grade to a depth of at least b'to permit bond to the ade. Spread
FSA _LFSA 1 1 (� 1 and rtot111 a oInch layer of new loll,then proced to placed remaining d
^I I 1 I ------
I / establish finish grade.
I i tl 20' BSL — — 4. Soil preparation for planting areas, Apply nitrified wood product amendment at a W
/ I 1 minimum rate of 6 cubic yards per 1000 sq.ft.,commercial fertilizer(Ib-Ib-Ib NPK or
040-180-049 r- 1 1 1 1 1 ; i — i - - - -
N y/X11 I ,,�-.••�— - equal)at a rate of 20 lbs.per 1000 sq.Ft.,gypsum at a rate of 100 Ib.per 1000 sq,Ft. t
I//1 I I
I I I 1 J L_-45'--____--- Rototll l to a depth of b'to 10'. Compact and settle all areas W
`1/ ___ 1 I __ L__ --45- 170' Irrigation to a minimum depth of 12'.by application of heavy •
< j J
-� L 45'-- 150' _ 5. All plants shall be top quality nursery stock,free of disease and Insect pests. Plants Z d)
—_--_-�---- 150' ---- - 747.97' �-\ 040-630-011 shall be normal size for container,vigorous,and true to name and variety. O M
I - 298' ` b. Plant holes shall be the some depth as the root ball,and two times the width for shrubs � fv�/ Ln S l 1
i
N85'4422"E and three times the width for trees. Back FIII for the plant holes shall be existing soil ^ (L O
/ I I ' i which has been previously amended. Apply Osmocote controlled Release Formula fertilizer t e I
(I8-6-12,4 month formula)per monhocturer9 recommendations.
1 a-a O
. When planted,crown of plant shall be I-I/2'above fInLSFn grade. Prepare a water basin by
forming a soil ring at least 3'high and as wide around the outer edge of the new plant
11 _-�------- _ hole. Water thoroughly to eliminate air pockets.i w b. Upon completion of planting all contalnerized material,rake all shrub and ground cover areas
zto/ smooth grade,leaving watering basins Intact. Prior to placement of bark mulch,all LaJ shrub and ground cover areas shall be treated with a pre-emergent herbicide(Ronstar or u O
I / I equal)per manufacturer's directions. .`
('lana a x iioj r aur 5h•edrleci cedar Dark IA all shrub old ground cover areas prior to planting y V
of rooted cuttings or liners of ground cover plants.
10, Rooted cuttings or liners of ground cover shall be planted In straight rows and evenly 'l V e
Itriangular spaced at Intervals noted In plant legend. Plant each rooted plant with Its Q
I I I II. poor trees require
rooting soil In a mamer that will Insure minimum dlstmIxince of the z n/
Z C� lL
stoking,use two 2'diameter treated lodge pale stakes set a minimum � D.L �
Iof 12'Into undisturbed sub grade below the root ball. Place ties and stakes only to the Q Q
/ level which will hold the tree upright;proper height Is b'above the point where the tree
will snap to an upright position by Itself If the top is pulled to one side as If wind
loaded and then released. Ties shall be cinch-tie flexible vinyl(or equal)nulled to stake
with galvanized nails.
snrA
I 1 II I rootboll A&-BUFFER PLAN
amended backfill-water tree ties-cinch tle I ore equal 1 v heavily to reduce air pockets tree stakes-2 per tree sa uc
040-180-013 i so 11 ring -cut to within 3'of tree ties
I w I i rootiwll
loll ring '
amended backfill-waterer'
I I i -dig only the depth of rootball heavily to reduce air pockets
040-180-041 y P°G
I I I I 2 times width of rootball -dig only the depth of rootball
I
4'or
3 times width of rootball
Shrub Planting Tree Planting 4 Staking o
0
0.
0
120, LI
PLANTING THP
PLAN "'°�
SCALE: 1'=60'
60• 240' NORTH a4 Il-09-D,
Botanical flame-Gommon Nome
PLANTING 6ROUP'A'
A Plataus acerlfollo Yarwood'-London Plane Tree
B Rosa Flower Carpet white'-Mite Carpet Roses
G Gotone®ter poneyl-Parney Gotoneaster
PLANTING 6ROLP W
A Zetkovo serrata'Green Vase'-ScHleaf Zeikova
B Berberls thurber Ig I Yrlmson Pygmy'-Crimson Pygmy Japanese Barberry
C Nerhan oleander'Casablanca'-Dwarf white Oleander
A Single row decldqus trees(continuous)plod 30'on center
II I II I — B Trgple raw trespass Inhibiting (continuous).(contius).plant 3'an center THOMAS H. PHELPS
040-180-021 C, Single row screening shrubs
LAR Of CAPE AR(NIi ECTUAE
PLANT LEGEND ASIA
Gt4.Size KeM Botanical Name-C_rnon Name Cil'domi.In",Ardono#4131
`
TRIM-5 1418 tWpb-k Wq
040-180-048 I I ` A A
` B B IT a15 PLA. YAR Platays acerilolta Ya^wood'-London Plane Tree (him,G 95938
O 60' EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND q a15 ZEL. 6RE. Zelkova serrata•Green vase'-Sa+leaf Zelkova (S10)/9t-0191141(SIUJ892.9SU8
I 30' UTILITIES TO BE RESERVED FOR THE G G
l 040-630-009 SHRUBS
--.I 30'I BENEFIT OF PARCELS 2, 3 AND _ 25505 BER CRI. Berberls Narbergn•crbnson Wwnu•-crimson Pygrny Jgpanese Barberry
41 a5 GOT. PAR Gotanemter por�eyl-Pone_Cotoneoster
51 05 NER GAS. Nerlum oleander Y.psoblonco�-Dwarf white Oleander
468 a2 ROS. FLw Rasa Flower Carpet Mite'-white Carpet Roses
I 1 \ �// Construct a 6'hkji wood fence along property line adjacent to agricultural use
20 O� LOT 4 j; \ PLANTING,NOTES
(TYPICAL) — — r — h 1.11 ACRES NET { \\ I. Installing Contractor shall verify quantities and erects to be planted prior to start of Job.
1.14 ACRES GROSS/I
Z \ Notify Landscape Architect of any discrepancies prior to starting work
o — I '•I o 2. All planting areas shall be completely free of trash,debris,rocks,and construction
LORENZ I a — LOT 1 3 1 ,',LOT 3 �..• I > tj)
LOT 2%� I I N materials larger than 2',and shall be brought to finish grade before planting begins.
a 1.47 ACRES NET I I I 1 0.79 ACRES NET I 040-630-010 Finish grade shall be 2'below surface of walks,curbs,and paved areas In plant ng areas Z Z
040-180-051 0.73 ACRES NET 1� 11,
o I 1.90 ACRES GROSS 1 I 1 1.01 ACRES GROSS I N �? O where bark Is to be Installed. Grades shall be flush at catch basins. Surfaces shall be iL Y
1 1.01 ACRES GROSS 1 N 1 1 i
sloped with regard to drainage requirements so that water does rot le or stand.
S.OSt ACRES I I 1 1 10' BSL P 9 q t
t.? 1 I ( 1 3. If additional soil Is required,It shall be approved loam 05 similar to the existing soil n
I 1 I I I 1 I I % / as possible,free of debris and noxious weeds. Prior to placing additional soil,disc or
/ ,/ 1 1 0 I I 10 b'scarify the sub grade to a depth of at least to permit bonding to the subTaide. Spread
ETs- / ;
A I and rototlll a one Inch layer of new soil,then proceed to place remaining soil and
establish finish grade.
20' BSL 4• 5011 preparation for planting areas. Apply nitrified wood product amendment at a w
minimum rate of 6 cubic:iper er 1000 s ft,conmerclot fertilizer(16-16-16 WK or
040-180-049) �- - equal)at a rate of 20 lbs.per 1000 sq.t.,gypsum at a rate of 100 lb.per 1000 sq,ft. tu
I x'; ��I I ��f I 1 1 I _
I% .�:.,, f��,,1 �I I 4— I I ;%•' Ratotlll to a depth of b'to 10'. Compact ad settle all areas .f1 W
00 1":///l -45'-J L--45--- '--- Irrigation to a minimum depth of 12'.by application of heavy V➢
�`'`` J (--- 170'
i i L 45---Y 150' -_ 5. All plants shall be top quality nursery stock,free of disease and Insect pests. Plants -y J d)
-�- 150 ---- Shall be normal size for container,vigorous,and true to name and varle L
I I _ _----298; 747.97' I 040-630-011 6. Plant holes shall be the same depth as the root ball,and two tlme5 the width for Shrubs t O � m
Iand three times the wldth for trees. Back fill for the plant holes shall be existing soil /1
I I N65.44'22"E I which has been previously amended. Apply Osmocote Controlled Release Formula fertilizer R ♦ O
I (18-6-12,4 month formula)per manufacturer's ()recommendations. I
1. Men planted,crown of plant shall be 1-1/2'above finish grade. Prepare a water bosin by Q
forming a soil ring at least 3'high and as wide around the outer edge of the new plant 443.
I `w __-1Z-------- ------ ,-- _ hole. Hater thoroughly to eliminate air pockets. W W X
/ I--'---` — — — — — b. Upon completion of planting all containerized material,rake all shrub and ground cover areas <
I �'��T to smooth grade,leaving watering basins Intact. Prior to placement of bark mulch,all �.
7 I`_-- - I shrub and ground cover areas shall be treaters with a pre-emergont herbicide(Riaetor or X O
LLJ> equaU per mawfactu erg directions. -A �l
Q I / .. - I 9- Place a 3'lager of shredded cedar bark In all shrub and ground cover areas prior to planting
040-180-052 of rooted cutt"or liners of ground cover plants. 4 Q X
-11 1 I 10, Rooted cuttings or liners of ground cover shall be planted In straight rows and evenly �l
I I triangular spaced at Intervals noted In plant legend. Pled each rooted plant HIth Its 0
Z n/
I I / p Ofortlonate anamt of rooting sell In a manner that will Insure minimum disturbance of the 1 e Z
1 n l.X_
I I I
It. For trees that require staking,use two 2'diameter treated lodge pole stakes set a minimum V LL
of 12'Into undisturbed sub grade below the root ball. Place ties and stakes only to the < Q
level which will hold the tree upright;proper height Is 6'above the point where the tree
will snap to an uprght position by Itself If the top Is pulled to one side as If wind
loaded and than released. Tles shall be cinch-tie flexible vinyl(or equal)nulled to stake
with galvanized nalls.
I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I e__..e_ .E:�` -
I Ir I rootball `d A6-BUFFER PLAN
II I I amended backfill-water tree ties-cinch tle or equal
( O heavily to reduce air pockets tree stakes-2 per tree u
040-180-013 I I I b soil ring r-cut to
ootball~Ithln 3'of tree ties �' N• P"er r
I w I
Z I son rig
I I 040-180-041 I —dig only the depth of rootboll amend bakflll-water
heavily
to reduce air pockets i
I I I I 2 times width of rootball -dig only the depth of rootball
or
3 tunes width of rootboll
Shrub Planting1,, Tree Planting 4 Staking o
PLANTING PLAN "�
SCALE: I°=60' °rv�' iNP
1'=60' L 1
60' 240' NORTH II-09-0,
ram .saws.,. d I
NO _
G
Z m
N
S� I
> I
PROJECT =
o�Z LOCATION 4I
DAYTON HWY.
I I — SCALE 1 =100'
ulv o �� 040-180-048 I / I
o I 60' EASEMENT FOR INGRESS. EGRESS AND
9v 30'I - ,�iP UTILITIES TO BE RESERVED FOR THE
o 040-630-009
90 ?� 30' I J ) BENEFIT OF PARCELS 2, 3 AND 4. 759.60' ^/Q�S
®
N85.42'OO-E 150 I •150' 170' •
SSA I f 1. ZONING: SR-1 (SUBURBAN/RESIDENTIAL - ONE ACRE)
LOCAl10NMAP - - - 310 5 Tom - I I ' \ pw
NTS _ — 202 LOT 4 \ 2. GENERAL PLAN: AR (AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL)
I (TYPICAL) _ 1.11 ACRES NET
1.14 ACRES GROSSi I \ 3. LAND USAGE: EXISTING - RESIDENTIAL
Z T 1 I _--,LOT PROPOSED - RESIDENTIAL
P/CTURE LEGEND t LORENZ I S r Lor, 1 I I I LOT 2 3 I , , -- 11
�' 1 1.47 ACRES NET I I 0.79 ACRES NET v (o � 040-630-010 .4. PROJECT SURVEYOR: JAMES M. HERRICK. PLS 5616
040-180-051 I > I0.73 ACRES NET v 'e
' o I 1.90 ACRES GROSS 11.01 ACRES GROSS I N ilk
"I
1.01 ACRES GROSS I \ o
5.05* ACRES I N I 1 It-10• BSL I 5. SEWAGE: INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC TANKS AND LEACH FIELDS
1 6. WATER: INDIVIDUAL WELLS
20' BSL 7. POWER: PACIFIC CAS AND ELECTRIC
040-180-049 v I ® 1 I `\ 11 ®i I i T J 8. TELEPHONE: SBC
,- L-4 4T ———— 9. STORM DRAINAGE: TO BE DETERMINED
L_ —4 170'
L 10. OWNER: GERALD & DENISE LORENZ
- ---- 1r�•��,
9456 JONES AVE. DURHAM, CA 95938
;F:;+ ,. +•I ® I ................................::.:...�.:
Br5
2494 '
E: ;.;:...:......... t.......::........: ....:......:.:.:.:.:..:::::.:.. a:. .......,.....,............. .... ..............................
:...:i.:s.:.:.:...a.:..::t.:;...-:.::.:.t..;..:i.::.:i.::.::...:;..:..::..:.::.::..::...:..::;..:..:i..
11. DEVELOPER: GERALD &DENISE LORENZ
8.... . , , , : .
. 2�.-::: ::. : . ,: ,: ,. ,, , : ,,, .
............ : 9456 JONES AVE. DURHAM
CA 9 93
:::. . 8
. — 12. AVERAGE ELEVATION PER GHICO QUAD MAP: 160 F
EET ABOVE SEA LEVELSUPERCEDED
_ — I — Q I oao-180-052 I
II r EA
LEGEND AR
I I t —
_ TOTAL ACREAGE: 5.05 ACRES
PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE I I I I PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS: 4
AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 1.26 ACRES
EXISTING PROPERTY LINES
1
APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF JONES AVENUE I
040-180-013 N I I \
0_180-05 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER LO
Z �•
o CALCULATED POINT I 040-180-041) I
LFSA LEACH FREE SETBACK AREA
BSL BUILDING SETBACK UNE I I PRE-DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
8 PROPOSED WELL LOCATION
(� EXISTING WELL LOCATION I I FOR
I I
10' X 720' AREA TO BE USED AS GERALD AND-'DENISE BROWN
AGRICULTURAL BUFFER. TYPE TO BE BE � -- ^
DETERMINED.
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED J — —
CUL—DE—SAC FOR THE COOPER TENTATIVE — — _ — - pAYTON HWY• BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 30,
PARCEL MAP APPLICATION go7-°011. — _ DURHAM TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST,
® MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN
PROPOSED LOCATION FORA 2,500 SF BUILDING
ENVELOPE. IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE
COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
North 111 MISSON RANCH BLVD.,SUITE 100
0900,CALIFORNIA 95926
I Civil Engineers -Surveyors PHONE: (530)893-1600 FA)@ (530)893-2113
Chico, California WED SITE: ■ww.northstareng.com
SHEET 1 OF 1 AP#040-180-051 SEPTEMBER, 2007 JOB: 9541
I -
ebECEDED
f
I
I
V
N
i
DURHAM STATE LAND SETTLEMENT T21� .. R2E, Mo®eBo&Mo' 40 8
2�PTN' S.B.E. 872-4-14A-8-9 T ARM
28 SUB. OF FER F 3 1/2 MIN. RTS.
A F,
ONES 33
TRACT 001 2.5 c
MCANARLIN
752.702�
65 - � 5.05Ac 8 30.72 AC
S.B.E. 843-4-25A 3.83Ac
g /337.46 1942- n
390.39 757.70 ilg
O125.00
$ 609.40 Z
13.83 AC r*1
to ; t 35
24 19 308.44 O 8.87 AC 34 y
3 AC�
1175.54 9.67 AC
1.20 30.18 AC
PM 77-79 827.10
1532.3
O g g + 9.5 AC
0 19.82 AC
9.72 AC
to2ia s31.ss 3713UTTE
54
2 COUNTY
N 5 AC N� 721-50 .5 AC g � ,
L'� A 1 12007
S J 1 Ie t 4.24 24
248.93 ip 5.03 AC 0 = 23 tr . OPWNT
DF,
o $ -
� � 9.12 AC � 30.29 ACt S 'R�CES
66 .04 �' 1
w w PM 65-14 870 `
3
18.02Act $.5APZ 2 22 .5 A
DURHAM `S 4 s 0 217.8
cn
SCHOOL $ O 2 PC 7.67 AC t 5.1 AC MIN. RTS.
255,19 -d
729 y,
79.37 1 $
63 LO 3 S 4.85 AC 3
4.35Ac $ N 49 �' PM 76-53 7 7 94 30
� 13.29 AC
5.04 AC 2 0
514.77 m
TOO
N 52 �'
356.3 li 4.78 AC 12.71 AC
706.30 - 51.00-'-
_ -
51 a5 12 8; `rP
a
3.3 AC 2 AC 41 4.92 AC �` - Butte County Assessor's Map
F1 DURHAM HOUSE - ;52:to--- ,a7.27 ,50: Book 40D Pee 1
8
DU HAM - D OS86'11'40°W fY
DURHAM - OROVILLE CREATED BY ST CREATED ON 09-01-1999
DURHAM HOUSE 136 MOR 96/98 4-96 N0 ALL INFO sHolara °"^ss�°R REVISED BY SOT REVISED ON 6-2-2005
1 �® PARCEL MAPS ARE FOR ASSESSOR'S OPFlOE uSE ME NAME 40-18 EFFECnW 2005-06 ROLL
AND DO NOT NECESSARILY CONSRRl1E LEGAL
LOTS. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE
ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHM. Compiled The Butte COUl1 Assessor's Office
f
f '
I
f
�,� ' , _ ��\, • ., STN SEC 30 X21 N R2E ' -. ----------------_._..._:.----- 4®
50 00°
g® S$� 147.00
i
279-00
f
in
167.58 O
w
7
.95 AC 1°=100'
.84 AC tiro°9�y�1
79.84 19.62
A 6
o 10 6 f
0
o .
10
00 .63 AC
J00
LOTS A & 8 ?- 202.00
.70 AC p m OMON ARFA
207.00-
° O 5 a
1.20 AC
00 o
11 � o
0 14 Qn 202.00
LLJ
o .71 AC
v� 6
207.00
s 4
0
v
12 0 .65 AC
0
12 202.00
.71 AC
207.00 ` O
85.54 BUTTE
i 3 0 COUNTY
94.58 .67 AC ,UL
204.32 DEVELOPMENT
NOTEi These parcels are for assessment purposes I SERVICES
only and may not constitute legal parcels. 13 O
� N
O
13 —
o m 1 2 bD
N
.90 AC � .93 AC
1.50 AC season's Map No. 40-63
County of Butt®o Calif.
DURHAM GREEN PHASE 2 146 MOR 66/68 2-12-99 LM 1/13 108.19 �� 168.53 �g/�/--- ^REVISED: 8-99
CUMN KIM K 1 133 MOR 96/0 12-2 132.98 35.02 q �{ 9 N86!11 40 E H UV 1
J— 40.00 —DA�01 V
DURHAM --
f .