Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
REZ 93-25_PLANNING
SEPARATOR SHEET a>„ bii — �f2o - nis PROJECT NUMBER RAZ �r3 -zs 4YZ` PROTECT SUMMARY SHEET 93-25 Log No. A JEFF JARRETT NORTHSTAR ENGINEERIN(r MIKE applicant representative ADDRESS: w 13 � °° 20 DECLARATION DR. ' CHICO, CA. 95926 CHICO, CA. 95926 PHONE] 916 343-8217 916 893-1600 SAME property owner ADDRESS: r P�30JECT DESCR2I+'T=ON: REZONE TO PUD on property zoned U S-H_ located on the north side of Skyway at the northeast corner of Skyway and Canyon Rim Place identified as AP 011-420-015,O16 toan/area: Chico GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION AG-RESI DATE PRE-APP FEE PAID: $ 1213 OOREcE1PT NUMBER: 13647 6- - 3 APPLICATION ACCEPTED; FINAL APP. PAID: $ RECEIPT NUMBER: REZONING PETITION SIGNATURES CHECKED PERCENTAGE: 7. MAILING LIST PREPARED MAIL-OUT NOTICES WRITTEN NOTICES HAILED NUMBER: / 9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN DISPLAY AD PREPARED NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION 0 OC P G B R DATE OF PUBLICATION: INITIAL STUDY PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Categorical Exemption FILED: Negative Declaration FILED: Mitigated Negative Declaration FILED: Environmental Impact Report CERTIFIED: Other: STAIE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER: APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE NOTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING(:): iL BOARD OF SUPERVISORS` HEARING(s): RESOLUTION NLM ER (CPAs) ADOPTED: ORDINAHCE '1IR!11F.R __ ADOPTED: .. t, I •• .,. . _ ��. 97-07 5. Report to the Board on a denied rezone for Jeff Jarrett rezone of 13.3 acres of land, AP 011-420- 025 and -016, from "U" (Unclassified) and S-H (Scenic Highway) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) , property located on the north side of Skyway, at the intersection of Skyway and Canyon Rim Drive, east of Chico - action requested - INFORMATION ONLY. rte_ BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES -. _January _14_, 19,97 _ B Jeff Jarrett - Rezone 13.3 acres of land from "U" (Unclassified) and S-H (Scenic Highway)to PUD (Planned Unit Development)for property located on the north side of Skyway, at the intersection of Skyway and Canyon Rim Drive, identified as AP 011-420.-025 and 016, east of Chico. (CBS) (REZ93-25) (Continued open from June 13, 1996) -:_ Mr. Sanders said that no additional information has been received on this project and denial is still recommended. HEARING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC No one was present to speak on this item. HEARING CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC It was moved by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by Commissioner Lambert, and carried unanimously for denial of the Rezone 93-25 for Jeff Jarrett as per staff recommendation in the Agenda Report dated May 21, 1996. FINDINGS: Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and . Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed rezone and tentative subdivision approval has not been shown to meet the Butte County Sewage disposal requirements; and Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this report, move to deny the �i rezone to PUD for Jeff Jarrett on AP#01 1-420-015. PLANNING COMMISSION- MINUTES - December 12 1996 _ r - B. Jeff Jarrett - Rezone 13.3 acres of land from"U"(Unclassified)and S-H (Scenic Highway)to PUD (Planned Unit Development)for property located on the north side of Skyway, at the intersection of Skyway and Canyon Rim Drive, identified as AP 011-420- 025 and 016, east of Chico. (CBS) (REZ93-25) Mr. Sanders said that the applicant has not been able to provide adequate sewage disposal facilities. Commissioner Lynch suggested that if the project is denied, it shculd be denied without prejudice. Commissioner Cage said that the date under"Discussion"should be December 1996. HEARING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC Mr. Jarrett described the work he has been doing to solve the sewage disposal problem. He said he wants to keep working on the project and if it is denied he would like to reapply at a later date. Commissioner Lambert asked,if sewage is the biggest problem. Mr. Jarrett said that is correct, and there are a couple of residents who are opposed to the project. He is proposing twelve lots, one of which would be a community building with a pool, also to be used for fire protection. Commissioner Lambert asked if there is sufficient sewage capacity for a restaurant. Mr. Jarrett said the restaurant was allowed 4 units in relation to sewage disposal. Commissioner Lambert asked if Mr. Jarrett is comfortable with a denial without prejudice. Mr. Jarrett said he would actually prefer to obtain approval for the subdivision prior to solving the sewage disposal problems, since that would have to be done anyway. Commissioner Nelson said that twelve lots should not be approved prior to proof of the feasibility of the sewage disposal system. Commissioner Lynch suggested continuing the item to allow the applicant an opportunity to work on his project and avoid fees for a new application if possible. Chairman Nelson was in favor of the applicant making a new application. Mr. Sanders said it would be"cleaner' to deny the project and allow the applicant to reapply. The necessary information has been requested three times to no avail. Commissioner Lambert asked if the applicant could create 4 units on the property. Mr. Sanders said that the applicant could apply for a Use Permit for 4 units (multiple dwelling units)on the property, but that would not divide the property. A parcel division could be done with a rezone to SR-3 and a tentative parcel map. Mr. Jarrett said that he did not receive the correspondence which was sent regarding this application due to his personal situation. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — ":Tune 13, 1996 t � vz i•,,. w u.�; :,..'^,R � V �-M.N►X.� i �': �.. V �� , ice' .d �..�ki� r Sy�a tJ.e yr„r. + 7,vF�P W. 'S- �� i 1. •� �. �+ -� S►.��� �•.� �. is o �, L.�tl. � "e F�(q�'f' s � J i �' M � .w. r ,���1A_ Y�iR .:.?`s""��,�a.!����,�rl��+`S�a�`+�Sti2'#�1�t��'y�e�Vl��r�,.f1� ,7�k�t*�°tYt���c�`� 1ST ���� '�g�, 3 � � � ` � �� _ T..�� ....,--.-�•-+.rte^-�'e.""� .. ."'"'"' _".e_"`.""""_`..."�^-„"..�.---�....,._,.,,.,,.� r. -- .-.,�... .. .�.... t li Chairman Seegert thought that a continuance would give the applicant another chance to find a solution to the problems. Commissioner Nelson asked if Mr. Jarrett can solve the problems within a year. Mr. Jarrett said he needs to find a solution within six months. - - Commissioner Lambert was in favor of denial without prejudice. She suggested considering four 3 acre parcels. i i Mr. Jarrett noted that there are one acre parcels to the east and west. II Commissioner Nelson suggested that the applicant consider a project with smaller densities. i Mr. Jarrett said that 8 lots would be"break-even"financially. Commissioner Cage said she would be in favor of a continuance of nine months. Commissioner Lynch thought the applicant should be given a chance to proceed with his project, and that the project should not be denied simply to"clean out the file." Mr. Sanders said that staff would need to do work again on the project because the original work was done so long ago. The initial study would have to be revised, for instance. No additional fees could be charged. Commissioner Lynch said that the rules in effect at the time of the application should apply. Mr. Sanders said that the rules in effect at the time of taking action should apply. Eric Snedeker, an adjacent neighbor, said his backyard would open up into the project. He thought that . three years was enough time to have completed the project and was opposed to a continuance. He was concerned about the impact on the existing water and sewer systems, and increased traffic. He was opposed to the proposed community center. He said that the project could ruin his property value and his view. Mr. Snedeker said he owns another lot he could develop, but does not want a delay in finding out what will happen with the Jarrett property. He does not want parking spots behind his house or increased lighting or a public swimming pool. There are lot of kids in the neighborhood. There should be a project with concrete answers in relation to sewer, water, roads, access and environmental factors and not this elusive project. Mr. Jarrett said meetings were held to which all the area residents were invited and asked for input. The proposed community center would be near the freeway by the entrance. This would be a gated community. The layout of the parking spaces could be changed. There is now a view which was created because the restaurant was torn down. They would be installing an additional well to back up the existing water system for the area. Almost every issue has been addressed except for the sewer. Mr. Snedeker said there was always a view even when the restaurant was there. He said that his neighbors did not come to this meeting to oppose the project because of the recommendation for denial. i He felt this project did not meet its deadline. HEARING CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING-- COMMISSION MINUTES - June 13, 1996 - 1: I ,,s- x° ks:w:�.17' ':�" ' ..1:�5'!^ .�, •• +\y,{ 3SlrV-Gt t^it xs ti 'w„a�+ 4'`ax- � ",r» ' '^s��,A�e .t`...�;.�.:...r.''n�� '�►� � '.�a` �+t �.�y�,.. a�w �' ��. i i i i 'i J - Commissioner Lynch asked if there would be changes in the proposed map. Mr. Sanders said that a revised map would be required due to changes in the PUD Ordinance. It was noted that a PUD application requires a very detailed map, including parking spaces. It was moved by Commissioner Lynch, seconded by Commissioner Cage, and carried unanimously for continuance of the Jeff Jarrett project on AP 011-420-015 and 016 to December 12, 1996, at 9:00 a.m., provided that the applicant sign a waiver to any time constraints. Commissioner Nelson said that essentially the staff would be looking at a new project under the auspices of a continuance. Commissioner Lynch said he was not necessarily in favor of the project because of approving a continuance. Commissioner Lambert noted that the revised map would be the map which would be considered for action in December. Mr. Sanders said that the item would be republished and notices sent to the neighbors. • .rte.. - - BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - June 13, 1996 :�.0 _� s AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commission FROM: Craig Sanders, Senior Planner DATE: May 21, 1996 REQUEST: Rezone 93-25 -Jeff Jarrett: A request to rezone 13.3 acres of land from U(Unclassified) and SH(Scenic Highway) to PUD (Planned Unit Development), identified as A.P. 011-420-015 & 016, located on the north side of Skyway, at the intersection of Skyway and Canyon Rim Drive, east of Chico. RELATED ITEMS: None FOR: Planning Commission Meeting of June 13, 1996 ABSTRACT: Staff recommends denial of this application. DISCUSSION: This application was received in June of 1993. An initial study was prepared and mitigation measures were suggested. The applicant was not able to satisfy the Butte County Environmental Health Department's requirements for sewage disposal and the project has been held in limbo for the past 3 years. There have been numerous attempts to encourage the applicant to provide additional information to the Environmental Health Department or revise the project with no results. The applicant was given notice in December of 1996 to provide the necessary information or the project would be scheduled for hearings and recommended for denial. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: This application has been defined as a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and as such, is subject to the requirements of CEQA. An Initial Study Part 1 has been prepared by the applicant and Part 2 has been prepared by County staff. Based upon the review of the Initial Study, staff has determined that the project impacts can be fully mitigated. Because this project is being recommended for denial, an environmental determination does not have to be made. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS: This application requires that a public hearing be advertised and held. Advertisement of the public hearing was published in a local newspaper and were mailed to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property. As of the date of this report we have received no public comment. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ 1 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the Board of Supervisors deny Rezone Application No. 93-25 making the findings and motion contained in exhibit A. K:\projects\jarreft.rez\pcagenda.rpt Reviewed and appy by: William arrel, Director of Development Services ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ 2 EXHIBIT A FINDINGS: Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed rezone and tentative subdivision approval has not been shown to meet the Butte County Sewage disposal requirements; and Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this report, move to recommend to the Board of Supervisors to deny the rezone to PUD for Jeff Jarrett on AP#011-420-015. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ 3 Vicinity Map i I Roa v Project Location �b�i//e hrro N o� 0 I REZ 93-25 AP#011-420-015, 016 -A FR-160 FR-5 Road FR-5 R-1 --- --- S- ----- Project Location U ------------------ U X1 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Applicant: Jeff Jarrett Owner: Same Hearing Date: June 13, 1996 @ 9:00 am. Existing Zane: U(unclassified), S-H(Scenic Highway) A 1 Request: Rezone to PUD (Planned Unit Development). No Scale Assessor Parcel No: 011-4420-015, 016 File: 93-25 r 'elUJOj!l9a °®IIIAQi® 9661 .0 £ AN uoislnla 6uluumd Planning,;01- rfmant I JUN 23 1993 EXHIBIT "A" Orovilia,Oai;fornia All that certain real property situate in the County of Butte, State of California, described as follows; Being a portion of Section 3. Township 21 North, Range 2 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at the southwest corner of . Lot 1 of the Skansen Subdivision - Unit No. One as shown on that certain map filed for record in Book 35 of Maps, at Pages 22 and 23 in the office of the Butte County Recorder, said Point of Beginning being located on the northerly right-of-way line of the Skyway; Thence leaving said Point of Beginning and said northerly right-of- way line along the westerly line of said Skansen Subdivision, North 06 45' 10" West, 220.00 feet; Thence North 22 35' 12 " East, 179 .39 feet; Thence North 44 58' 52" East, 160.00 feet; Thence North 45 01' 08" West, 310.00 feet; Thence North 48 41' 31" East, 163.73 feet; Thence North 16 30' 51" West, 70.00 feet; Thence leaving .said westerly line of Skansen Subdivision, South 58 31' 31" West, 668.21 feet; Thence South 78 48' 55" West, 114.3.6 feet; Thence South 06 45 ' 10" East, 228. 12 feet;: Thence South 66 21' 20" West, 100.00 feet; Thence South 06 45 ' 10" East, 335.23 feet to said northerly right- of-way line of the Skyway; Thence along said northerly right-of-way line, North 83 14 ' 50" East to the Point of Beginning. Containing 13. 3 acres, more or less. The above described property has been assigned Assessor's Parcel Numbers 011-42-0-015 and 016 . ty Z49, I !t' /6°,V:5/W.. TO.X 9 9 SS � _ 3 0 3�r9lYJf1Y 3v�fJ. $ - U71r e2V. aZ! elwpt &f Z-5 7�°98:f-f"a/. 5.d6°Z1 /M.00, !Y ZZ°JS%Z'�. e7 mof OW w A ZZO. aF CYJ' � IS (r 14 Planning Department JUN 2 3 1993 /3. 3 AC"PE.S t Oravliia,Oa;;larnia 0 A33f✓3O,2.� Ph'R�FL lYUIJ,�� el. P. /l- 9Z- D/-5' & 0/6 i t t,� . N&thStar Pianpsng 08P1111"t 20 DECLARATION DRIVE 0 8 03 ENGINEERING CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95926— JUL Civil Engineers•Planners•Surveyors 916-893-1600 Cr��gllg ,Dal+frjenla TO: Job No. 1�533 Date Attn. G�a� PROJECT: TRANSMITTING THE FOLLOWING: FOR: Herewith _ Approval Personal Delivery �"'G�� /"9� Information Separate cover Checking STATUS: Your use Preliminary Files In Progress Processing Final Review-comment As requested MESSAGE: C.C. TO Signed r �� . i r .` r• .. .� a BL71r£ COZTf?TY �^ lrz: __ __ PLAN CONFORMANCE �$ORT�"�.�a� FOR PAR MAP OR STJF3I?2V25=ON MAP � .,•. Items 1-4 to be completed by applicant: 19 1. APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS: ?" Ff 3 �-t"t" % N o rz-,H sr :�e_ F_N ci rN e a?T o6- 20 C i.A ra -i /,j ter`_ C.H 9 G CA Gt5 (e 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: S I`j) U 3. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S): (S 11 - Li r__) 0 - O I c� 4. PROPOSE) CSE: The following items are to be completed by the Planning Department: CURRENT ZMMG: S-H LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT: GENERAL PUN DESIGNATION: Conditional Cr iteria• .AGRICE7,TURAL-RESIDENTIAL YES NO It-is recommended that you perform the 1. Agricultural Compatibilit7 following checked items: 2. hater and Sewer Capacity ARCSAEOL GICAL RECORDS COCK 3. Adequate Fire Facilities. BOTAN'CAL SURVEY F 4. Road Capacity and Maintenance, CAL SURVEY 5. Access to Commercial and Schools YES NO ORCHARD AND FIELD CROPS WZMM DEPAR='ENT OF FISH AND GAME DEVELOPMENT TONE: 1. Predominant 5-10 ac. Parcel Size v 2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries WI= FLOOD PLAIN: 3. Ag. Viability not Impaired WI=.'R-AREA, SPECIFIC OR Staff Determination: Substantially conforms to: LAND USE PLAN: GENERAL PLAN: 1. Land Use L Yes, 2. Conservation Name of Plan 3. Oppu Space WI= URBAN RESERVE. 4. Safety 5. Noise If Yom' Name of Reserve 6. Housing 7. Circulation AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN: ZONLNG: COMMENTS: P'M 7-QAJ GC-0C-Ya--A1._ ?L '(4N3 13 JZP-Q0t Staff Cate "'7— t AS THE APPLICANT FOR ME RECUESM LAND DIVISION, I AM AWARE OF MiE ABOVE STAFF DATION REGARDVG TME CONFORtMANCZ WITH IME GENERAL PLAN AND ZONLBG. Dated _ �� Signature of Applicant x zmd 4d a= *This report will expire and be discarded six (6) months from the date of staff signature. LD 1000A (revised 6-87) . . _. � -.�..� . r SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT Name ,,�Eff Jt9�P�1T Date Project AP # //- 92- 1 . Existing use (s) of the land W4-7177 2. Proposed use (s) of the 1 andE.3/Jf�T1 —le 3., Improvements proposed (See Ch. 20-21 County Code) 4. Public areas proposedi�2 5. Tree planting/or removal (approx. number) . 6. Preliminary copy of any condition, restrictive reservations or covenants existing or proposed shall- be attached to this statement. attached none 7. State .type of division, i .e. , private road, urban rural , etc. planning DepartnOn' JUL LD 1040 ©P®vlll�,��a�1i69C`�dIQ FOR OF E USE ONLY: Butte County Planning Dept. Receipt .# 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 Applicant (916 ) 538-7601 AP # Subdivision Name (if applicable) APPENDIX H Date Filed LAND DIVISION APPLICATIONS Supplemental Information for Planning Department 1. List and describe any other. related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 2. . Proposed scheduling/associated projects: 3. Anticipated incremental development (phasing of subdivision units, future development plans): n' e9 4. What method will be utilized to accommodate surface drainage? Describe how on-site and downstream drainage channels will be affected. �,eDPD�E� �To,2l.� D,�9llr 5. Proximity of water for fire fighting purposes (hydrants, ponds, etc. ) : 6. Will excavation or grading be necessary? Cubic yards (estimate): 7. Directions for travel to property (rural and mountainous areas only). H-1 8. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES* Identify potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the land division. What project design features or special conditions of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential environmental impacts? 9. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING* a) Describe the project site as it exists before the project, - including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. �/�9CV1t'T u/iTh'�CfTTG � 09.E T�? S b) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type. of .land use (residential, commercial, etc. ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, depart- ment stores, etc.. ) , and scale of devel-o_pment (height, . frontage, setback, rear yard, -etc. ). 7K F 57 ,�UTT� C;�,�,� C�91%Yd'y' TS T�C`��•C rte. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. U 'r, A-A, og_ x Date Sian ture For ' Use separate sheet for longer responses. 4/85 H-2 I R-' TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION [] TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP [] PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION [] WAIVER APPLICATION (Please check appropriate box) Applicant : JEFF JARRETT Phone No: 343-8217 Address : 24 SAN RAMON CHICO, CA. 95926 Owner- : . JERALD JARRETT —Phone No: 343-8217 Address : 24 SAN RAMON CHICO, CA. 95926_ - Engineer or Surveyor: NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING- -Phone No:_ 893-1600 Address : 20 DECLARATION DRIVE CHICO..,- CA. 95926 Mail notice of hearing to: APPLICANT' AND ENGINEER Location of property: Township 21- N. Range 2 E. Section 3 Assessors Parcel Number: 11-42-015 & 016 Total Acreage : 13+- AC. Please submit Preliminary Title Report or recent Policy of Title Insurance (dated within last six months) with application. Indicate below the date and recording information by which this particular parcel was created: Date : Book: Pages : Number and size of parcels being created (including remainder) : 13 PARCELS @ 1 ACRES+- Distance to natural water course or storm drain: PROPOSED STORM DRAIN ON SITE Proposed method of sewage disposal : C.S.A. NO. 21 Proposed source of water: GRAN MUTUAL WATER COMPANY Do power and phone lines exist to the boundary of the original parcel? YES If not, estimate the distance they will have to be extended: N/A LD 1020 Revised 7-24-80 Name of nearest public road: VISTA MESA DRIVE Distance to nearest public road:SITE FRONTS BOTH SIDES OF SAID ROAD If access is by prescriptive right-of-way, attach documentation to this application. If access is by a recorded private road easement, indicate deed reference : - VOLUME PAGE If there are any - no- access strips, these must be- shown on the tentative- map arid -the recording data indicated below: _ VOLUME PAGE Distance--to--city limits : 8 MILES- WEST TO CHICO Does. the owner of this parcel now own, or has he/she in the past owned, land adjoining this property? NO SIG OF APPLICANT SIGN URE OF OWNER OF RECORD SIGNATURE OF OWNER OF RECORD ------------------------------------------ ----------------------- FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ----------------------------------------------------------------- To Subdivision Committee : To Development Review Committee : Must take action by: Appeal to Board of Supervisors : Expiration Date : Comments • Receipt No. Total Received: By: a:CNTYAPP Planning oepar4anen4 APPLICATION FOR REZONINQuN 2 3 1993 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 010ville,California APPLICANT: Read and follow instructions set forth on last page of this form. Applicant's Name Jeff Jarrett Phone No. 343-82]7 Applicant's Mailing Address 24 San Ramon Chico CA 95926 Applicant's Interest in property(Owner, Lessee,Other) Owner's Name and Address Contact Person for Project(if other than applicant) NorthStar Engineering Assessor's Parcel Numbers) 11-42-015 & 016 Present Zoning "U" Requested Zoning Planned Unit Development P.U.D. Location,dimensions and size of area(s)to be rezoned 13 + acres on Vista La Mesa Z "A Drive at Canyon Rim Place & The Skyway a a w r� Z Street Address(if applicable) N/A U a Directions for travel to property(rural and mountainous areas only) N/A a a Applicant's reasons for rezoning provide. residential homesites compatible with the environmental setting and surrounding parcels. f . Proposed scheduling/Associated projects(formation of service district, etc.) as soon as possible / subdivision I Anticipated incremental development(future development plans subsequent to rezone): Subdivision Map Existing/proposed sewage disposal method: f'oL,nTServ;cP Aran No 21 Proximity of power and phone lines: along Skyway Distance to natural water course or storm drain: r Describe anticipated on and off-site drainage improvements(PUD, MHP): minimize concentration, cobble lined ditches Describe how on-site and downstream drainage channels will'oe affected(PUD, MHP): drainage will be dispursed to natural ravines & water courses. Water source: Gran Mutual Water Company Proximity of water for fire fighting purposes(hydrants,ponds,etc.) hydrants proposed Will excavation or grading be necessary? N�A Cubic yards(estimate)? N/A List and describe and other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city.,regional,State and Federal agencies: L a a If residential, include the number of units, whether uriits are single or multi-story in height, schedule of F, unit:sizes;,and-type of.household.size.expected. , z U12 residential (s.f.) lots. May be up to 2 story. If commercial, indicate the type., whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of a Q. sales area, and loading facilities If industrial,.indicate type,estimated employment per shift,and loading facilities. N/A If institutional indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities,and community benefits to be derived from the project. N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Identify potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the rezone. What project design features or special conditions-of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential environmental impacts? No significant environmental impacts. l ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topgraphy, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Site is vacant with scattered oak trees and shrubs. Topography. slopes to the Northwest. . I z 04 Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate.the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.), intensity of land use (one-family apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, setback,rear yard,etc.). z U Skansen Subdivision (residential) is adjacent to the East. Single family 96 residences. to the West (2+ ac. average) via parcel map. Butte Creek a Canyon to the North. Predominant foothill topography with scattered oak and vegetation. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read and understand the instructions and that the foregoing.statements are true,complete and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Dated: t%� Applicant's Signature ' Dated: �3 Property.owners signatur IIL . Project File Number a General Plan Designation Request Consistent? - Z Request: Rezone to P V D W Location and size of parcel(s) W U w Fir O :� -., ',t • - _. I I i I i i I I ;� - . '� Verify: Z' A.P.Number(s) Location Description Ownership Legal Description of Area O ' Proof of Agency(if needed) s ,""'Maps of Area/Development Plan for PUD's W °`Present Zoning U Reproducible Master Map of Development Plan(PUD's only) Date of Application received 2 3 $ l zi 3 .y Receipt No. 3(0 Application Taken By vr`S i i I i 4 NgthStar Planning OePartment 20 DECLARATION DRIVE ENGINEERING CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95926 ,JUN 2 3 1993 Civil Engineers•Planners•Surveyors 916-893-1600 ®roville,Calatornia TO: e Job No. 9833 Date P— Attn. PROJECT: �0_r'? �a - �l. TRANSMITTING THE FOLLOWING: FOR: Herewith Approval Personal Delivery Information Separate cover w���✓L°� Checking STATUS: 3 ��z X Your use Preliminary Files In Progress L5 DLSB S— ✓ Processing Final Review-comment As requested MESSAGE: C.C. TO Signed j i _�.,� _. _ ,; .. � , . _ • _ �- . , � , . . _ .. ,. PROJECT NAME FF ,TARRRTT S CH # AP # 011-4420-015.016 FILE # 30 Day Review Period Ends SCH Review Period Ends CORRESPONDENCE/ COMMENTS RECEIVED Date Agency/Person IO2, -7/q 193 A-Pflu C*nc)a -Pir-o l3 M1`jQU ,,ro -7 I�— `�361 --7 PROJECT NAME JEFF JARRRTT SCH # AP # 011-420-015,016 FILE # 30 Day Review Period Ends SCH Review. Period. Ends OUT-GOING ACTIVITY Date Action ZZ2: I . I I - i I i � I i _ L: O i l 440 002 9100 J STATUS: ACTIVE SNEDEE::ER ERIC W & MARCY L: Oil 420 015 000 - STATUS: ACTIVE= 1441 OAK RIDGE DR JARRETT. JERALD CHICO CA 95928 LAMESA 2918328576 1967 SKYWAY CHICO CA 95926 L: O i 1 440 003 000 STATUS: ACTIVE MARCOTTE DOLORES L L: Oil 420 016 000 STATUS: ACTIVE 1445 OAKR1DGE DR JARRETT JERALD CHICO CA 95928 VISTA LAMESA INC '29183391876 1967 SKYWAY CHICO CA 95926 L: O i 1 440 004 9100 STATUS: ACTIVE FAVOR FAMILY TRUST L: 9111 4291 V717 9.19191 STATUS: ACTIVE'. i FAVOR DAVID C & SHARON E TRUSTEES PRIDDY CHARLES R JR & MARY ANN F 0 BOX 1297 CHICO CA 95927 2515 RAMADA WAY CHICO CA 95926 L: Oil 4493 005 000 STATUS: ACTIVE CORNYN JAMES WILLIAM & MARCIA A MOORE L. O i l 420 019 000 STATUS. ACTIVE: CARTER GEORGE ,C JR & DORIS E 1463 OAk;RIDGE DR CHICO CA 95928 1321 CANYON RI.M PL CHICO CA 95928 L: Oil 440 012 000 STATUS: ACTIVE WOODWARD LARRY A & DONNA A I L: O i l 420,020 9100 STATUS: ACTIVE LEWIS WILLIAM W'& JOAN 0 ; 1459 OAk:RIDGE DR CHICO CA 95928 1339 CANYON RIM PE 1 CHICO CA 95928 . L: Oil 440 015 000 STATUS: ACTIVE:. MARLEY JOE S & MARCIA R L: Oil 420 021 000 STATUS: ACTIVE.' MCCAIG MAX B & JANICE L j 14b91 OAk;RIDGE DR M CHICO CA 95928 342 SPANISH GARDEN DR CHICO CA 95928 .. L: 011 440 016 919191 STATUS: ACTIVE LAUER JAMES T & DIANE D L: O i 1 4291 025 000 STATUS: ACTIVE KOROCK STANLEY W & LUZ CECILIA 1452 OA#;RIDGE DR CHICO CA 95928 761 REBECCA CT CHICO CA 95926 L: Oil 440 017 000 STATUS: ACTIVE VENARD RICKEY A & SHARON T L: O i l 420 026 9100 STATUS: ACTIVE' j STEWART RONALD E &:JOAN LORRAINE 1436 OAI.RIDGE DR CHICO CA 95928 400 SPANISH GARDEN DR CHICO CA' 95928 i L: 040b9191 02099191 STATUS: ACTIVE .• CHICO RESEARCH PARS: L P L: 01-1 420 007 000 STATUS: INACTI'.' CIO DONALD E SWARTZ MIS ASSOCIATES 29138 DALADIER DR RANCHO PALOS VER CA 90274 P 0 BOX 1477 CHICO '. CA 95927 L: 040 600 91.23 9100 STATUS: ACTIVE. NANCE CANYON PARTNERS L P L: O i 1 4491 001 000 STATUS: ACTIVE C/O DONALD E SWARTZ SEWELL JOHN R & LYNN 2038 DALADIER DR RANCHO PALOS VER CA 90274 1435 OAE;RIDGE DR CHICO CA 95928 n->A L.l t0 G- i.l ST ,A P#t 1 1— LA 2-0 — O k q V/0 1 t- W 2 0 1015 3A(2RGT'r 3 . j j0� I CA(2; C2 C- . ✓ i ow) ��w, ✓ ',%c coa iU M . v-1 'Q25 koc�oc�- s . ✓ .�� mite— Assoc- 0 ) ssoc a ✓ ©O (DC) y FAvocL F-T , X00 S �a�N�N s . ✓ . � WOODwa'2D l._. s s o i 2� 1015 V. X01 (p LAvG2 �• ✓ 101 -7 v c ez,v A P—r�,- P , i �Z'� plra pJc=G LJ�►J r i T i ti .. . ... Butte, u Y LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION s $ , DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916)538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 December 16, 1996 Jeff Jarrett 6063 Broyles Road Chico, CA 95926 Re: REZONE, REZ 93-25, AP 011-420-015, 016 Dear Mr. Jarrett: The Butte County Planning Commission on December 12, 1996, denied your request for a rezone to PUD for property located on the north side of Skyway. Should you desire to appeal this decision you must do so, in writing, with the appeal deposit of$250 to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to the expiration of the 8-day appeal period which is at 5:00 p.m., Friday, December 20, 1996. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.m and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. Very truly yours, ao"k g" M Craig Sanders Senior Planner CBS:ds COUNTY OF BUTTE .. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES w 4 m PLANNING DIVISION 7 County Drive oft 11'9 6 •��� Q, ]GE Oroville, CA 95965-3397 fold7157629 U.S. POS7A * M Planning Division JEFF JARRETT DEC 2 3 1996 6063 BROYLES ROAD Qrovllle, Calitomia CHICO CA 95926 JARR063* 959731019 IC95 12/19/46 ' RETURN TO SENDER JARRETT I ST 29 MOVED LEFT NO ADDRESS UNABLE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER f "�5'�?�9'�4'�!'?1 04 iiiu�il�nnllnllnilu�iiu���u�llnn��lliiu�llu�li�ul � i r . R wr + '1. S Ll , • ME UM • a TO: Craig Sanders, Planning Division FROM: Stuart Edell, Manager, Land Development Division, Public Works SUBJECT: Jeff Jarrett PUD - Rezone, Planning Commission Agenda for December 12, 1996 DATE: December 5, 1996 This application has been deemed incomplete, due to lack of. sufficient Environmental Health information, and was scheduled for hearing to deny the project on June 13, 1996. The June 13, 1996, meeting was continued to December 12, 1996, for the applicant to provide additional information. There is no additional information in your file and the only staff report, dated May 21 , 1996, recommends denial. If the-Planning Commission does recommend approval, I request a continuance of the hearing for development of appropriate findings and conditions for this type of project. SE/kp .1 01 Suite ®un PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE:(916)538-7601 FAX: (916)538-7785 December 16, 1996 Jeff Jarrett 6063 Broyles Road Chico, CA 95926 Re: REZONE, REZ 93-25, AP 011-420-015, 016 Dear Mr. Jarrett: The Butte County Planning Commission on December 12, 1996, denied your request for a rezone to PUD for property located on the north side of Skyway. Should you desire to appeal this decision you must do so, in writing, with the appeal deposit of$250 to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to the expiration of the 8-day appeal period which is at 5:00 p.m., Friday, December 20, 1996. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.m'and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. Very truly yours, Craig Sanders Senior Planner CBS:ds . .h • ,..... - utte oun r y ,:,I A L A N1 D 0 A T U � L V E A A i,J Cj - A J 7 DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: 1916)538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 June 13, 1996 Jeff Jarrett 6063 Broyles Road Chico, CA 95926 Re: REZONE, REZ 93-25, AP 011-420-015, 016 Dear Mr. Jarrett: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held June 13, '1996, the public hearing was continued open to December 12, 1996 to consider your application for a Rezone to PUD for property located on the north side of Skyway, Chico. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Very ours y truly 'y yours '11* m Farrel Director of Development Services WF:lr cc: k:\forms\confinue.frm PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916)538-7601 FAX: (9161538-7785 May 22, 1996 Jeff Jarrett 24 San Ramon Chico; CA 95926 Re: Rezone, AP 01.1-420-015 and 016, REZ93-25 Dear Mr. Jarrett: Enclosed is a copy of the Staff Findings concerning your application for a Rezone to PUD on property located on the north side of Skyway, east o, Chico. A public hearing has been set for June 13, 1996, at 9:00 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. In the event that no one will represent the applicant, please contact the Planning office prior to the scheduled public hearing. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. Sincerely, Craig Sanders Senior Planner CS:lr Enc. cc: NorthStar Engineering BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that public hearings will be held on Thursday, June 13, 1996, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following item at the following time: 9:00 a.m. - Jeff Jarrett - Rezone 13.3 acres of land from "U" (Unclassified) and S-H (Scenic Highway) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for property located on the north side of Skyway, at the intersec-ion of Skyway and Canyon Rim Drive, identified as AP 011-420-025 and 016, east of Chico. (CBS) (REZ93- 25) ITEM DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 9:00 a.m. - Rajinder Kumar -Variance to allow a canopy structure within 45 feet of the centerline of East Avenue on property zoned C-2 (General) located on the south side of East Avenue, approximately 100 feet west of Tom Polk Avenue, identified as AP 007-060-045, Chuco. (CBS) (VAR96-03) The above mentioned applications and maps are being referred by the Planning Manager to the Planning Commission regarding policy issues for senior citizen units. The Planning Commission will be the final authority on these items. The applications and maps are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION BARRY K. HOGAN, PLANNING MANAGER To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Thursday, April 30, 1996. n � . ' Sate 1xD 0p wArunA- L rH A -�/ D 8EAYr ` -- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH oxosom OF exmqomMsmTAL HEALTH THOMAS RBD, DIRECTOR 18'o cvumv o*ma, Drive omvine. California ossas Telephone: (916) 538'728e January 24' 1986 FAX: 11916> 538'216e Mike K8oEnempy NorthSter Engineering 2ODeclaration Drive Chico' CA 85973 RE: Jeff Jarrett PUD Mesa Restaurant Property, 8kyvvav Dear Mike: Your letter of January 19, 1996 was received. | understand the above application is dated and that it is necessary for Planning to act upon the application. w |tappears three (3) avenues may baconsidered by Mr. Jarrett: 1 . Mr. Jarrett originally proposed to work with the property owners of The Bluffs at Spanish Gardens with respect to utilizing the rnaxinnurn potential of Lot A, the community |eoohfie|d lot. This would include obtaining pipeline and maintenance easement to the site; agreement of the property owners to incorporate K4r' JanGtt's project into the wastewater facilities, design Of a system adequate to provide the anticipated present and future vvaStavvat8r treatment and disposal needs for both projects. Approval of proposal would require concurrence ofthe County with respect to CSA 21 responsibilities. 2' Mr. Jarrett may wish to consider the existing pond and the wastewater allocation for his property. Usage of this allocation would require a reduction in project size. ' 3. If completion of project planning will require an extended time period, Mr. Jarrett may wish to withdraw his application for later submittal. It will be necessary to contact � County Planning to determine if any refund of fees vvOu|d apply. ! Sincerely, "~o7x Plannirg Dapadmerlt` Thomas Raid, Director Division of Environmental Health 2 9 1QgR TR/m|f Oroo6�CZa.auffliS cc' Planning iDIt A CLEAN INDOOR AIR ENVIRONMENT FOR A HEALTHIER TOMORROW NorthStar ENGINEERING _ Civil Engineers•Planners•Surveyors January 19, 1996 Mr. Tom Reid, Director County of Butte ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT 18-B County Center Drive Oroville, CA. 95965 Dear Tom, I August, 1993, Jeff Jarrett applied for a PUD for 13 lots on the old Mesa restaurant site. The application has been reviewed by planning, mitigation measures proposed and has been somewhat dormant waiting for a sewage disposal solution. In August, 1993, 1 submitted several alternatives to Vance for review. Central to this issue is the use of the existing ponds in CSA 21. As you know, an agreement was entered into with MIK Associates, Ron Stewart and others setting forth the monitoring and other requirements for use of the site. Mr Jarrett is anxious for some resolution of this issue as he has not been able to acquire easements to gain access to the lot "A" in the BIuffs at Spanish Gardens which might provide him with an alternative to use of the pond site. Planning is also anxious to do something with the pending application. Could you please look into the application and anything else that may pertain to the use of the existing ponds and or area on CSA property so that we can hopefully come to some resolution? Thank you. Very Truly Yours, NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING Michael McEnespy C.C. client Planning Environmental Hcai:h JAN 2 2 1996 20 DECLARATION DRIVE Oroville, California CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95926 916-893-1600 WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS - -3- BUTTE COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO. 21 CHICO, BUTTE COUNTY An A. Discharge Prohibitions 1. The direct discharge of wastes to surface waters or surface water drainage courses is prohibited. 2. The by-pass or overflow of untreated or partially treated waste is prohibited. 3. Discharge of waste classified as 'hazardous' or 'designated' , as defined in Sections 2521(a) and 2522(a) of Chapter 15, is prohibited. 4. Discharge to the gravel filter pretreatment system is prohibited until County Service Area No. 21 approves such discharge. B. Discharge Specifications 1. The"_30-day average daily dry weather discharge flow shall not exceed 16-000 gallons per day to the pond system or 13,000 gallons per day to the gravel filter pretreatment system. 2. The dissolved oxygen content of ponds shall not be less than 1.0 mg/l for 16 hours in any 24-hour period. 3. Neither the treatment nor the discharge shall cause a nuisance or condition of pollution as defined by the California Water Code. 4. The discharge shall not cause degradation of any water supply. 5. The discharge shall remain within the designated disposal area at all times. 6. The treatment facilities shall be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to prevent inundation or washout due to floods with a 100-year return frequency. 7. There shall be no standing water in the gravel filter pretreatment system area. 8. _Ponds shall be—managed to prevent breeding of mosquitoes. In particular: a. An erosion control program should assure that small coves and irregularities are not created around the perimeter of the water surface. b. Weeds shall be minimized throu5"h control of water depth, harvesting, or herbicides. JEFFREY STEVEN ; JARRETT 1450 Springfield Drive #63 Chico, California Republic [PZ 95928] February 2, 1996 Craig Sanders Butte County Planning Department Administrative Offices 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Sanders: This letter is in response to your correspondence regarding the "MESA" project on the Skyway in Chico, California. I have,been,in contact with Mike McKenepsi of North Star Engineering. He informed me that the hold up was in the Environmental Health Department. Neither North Star nor I have been informed by the Environmental Health Department of their decision or direction. I would appreciate an extension of time in which to provide you with the information on our proposed project. It would be odd to be denied our hearing date or our proposals on the project if Butte County's own departments have not provided us with information which is required for us to complete the documentation you require. Please advise me of the status of the Environmental Health Department's progress and your plan of action. Rf t yyours, ey;S. Jarrett cc: Tom Reed (Butte County Environmental Health) Mannino DQ-miriment FEB 0 5 1996 ®rovrr., �; t Count ... . �--.. �. .. ... u to - PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 Jeff Jarrett January 9, 1995 1450 Springfield Dr. #63 Chico, CA 96928 Re: Rezone 93-25 - AP 011-420-015 & 016 Dear Jeff, As you know, this project has been in limbo since 1994 awaiting information from the Butte County Environmental Health Division. This situation cannot continue indefinitely. If the needed information is not available within the next 30 days, this project will be scheduled for denial at the next available Planning Commission hearing. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Craig Sanders Senior Planner ' cc: Northstar Enginering i A IN � PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CEN-TER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916)538-7785 Jeff Jarrett December 28, 1995 24 San Ramon Dr. Chico, CA 96926 Re: Rezone 93-25 - AP 011-4207015 & 016 Dear Jeff, As you know, this project has been in limbo since 1994 awaiting information from the Butte County Environmental Health Division. This situation cannot continue indefinitely. If the needed information is not available within the next 30 days, this project will be scheduled for denial at the next available Planning Commission hearing. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, vL� Craig Sanders Senior Planner coqn-ySuite PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: 19161 538-7601 FAX: (9161 538-7785 May 12, 1994 Jeff Jarrett 24 San Ramon Chico, CA 95926 Re: Rezone, File 93-25 on AP No. 011-420-015 and 016 Dear Jeff: As I have not heard from anyone on this project, I thought I would follow up with a letter. My last information was from Environmental Health via a phone call. On October 27, 1993 1 spoke with Health regarding any conditions they may have for the project. The response was that they needed additional fees to make a proper evaluation and to determine the options available. Would you please inform me of the status of this project. Do you wish to continue with the rezone and parcel map? If so, please coordinate with the Health Department to satisfy their requirements and provide me with a letter stating you are waiving the CEQA timelines. If not, please let me know so that I may close out the application file. Please respond with the project status within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office Monday through Thursday between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, Lisa Purvis Wilson Associate Planner LPW:Ipw cc: NorthStar Engineering, Mike McEnespy �f o� . Jeff Jarrett Rezone (PUD) Conditions 1. A pressurized water system per County Code is required with a minimum of 500 gallons per minute fire flow. 2. Three fire hydrants (6") are required, spaced at a maximum of 800' apart. The locations of the hydrants will be coordinated with the fire department. 3. All dwellings and access must meet the Fire Safe Regulations of Public Resources Code 4290. 4. All green space/open space areas to be preserved must be cleared of underbrush to prevent a wildfire from reaching the structures, excepting the no-disturbance zones as identified by the project Botanist. 5. A homeowners association or some other means must be generated to guarantee yearly maintenance of the water system and the green space/open space clearance. 6. Vista La Mesa Drive will be open to Rim Rock Drive for a second access. - o?4 7. Lots 5 through 13: all overhangs, including decks, will be enclosed with non- A P combustible construction on the canyon sides. 8. A development impact fee for Sheriff Facilities shall be paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article II of the Butte County Code, prior to issuance of building permits or Use Permit in the case of a mobile home park. Said fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permit or Use Permit. 9. Any street lighting installed shall be directed away from the Skyway and shall shield traffic from any undue glare. 10. Drains used to accomodate surface drainage should be underground drains to grade. Catchment basins and culverts shall be installed no lower than the bottom of the drains. Main flow drains that will receive down stream drainage from this project shall be to grade and maintained free of emergent vegetation. A provision for continued maintenance to prevent the growth of emergent vegetation should be included in the homeowners association. 11. Power transformers shall be the above-ground pad type, as opposed to the below- ground vault type, transformers.(Vault type transformers often hold water in areas with marginal soil percolation and create a mosquito breeding habitat that is difficult to control with conventional mosquito control methods) 12. Meet the requirements of the Department of Fish and Game for the preservation of oak trees: A. Individual trees or groups of trees that are retained as a function of project J design shall be fully protected both during and after construction. In order to protect the root zone during construction a root protection zone (RPZ) shall be established using protective fencing. The RPZ shall be an area that is 1.5 times the distance from the trunk to the dripline. Within this protective buffer, no grading, trenching, fill, or vegetation alteration of any kind shall be allowed. B. Following project construction, a fact sheet describing the value and care of native oaks should be distributed to all residents. At a minimum, this fact sheet should encourage homeowners to avoid unnecessary pruning and encourage, except where a safety hazard, the retention of all snags. C. Individual trees that are unavoidably lost due to project implementation should be replaced by planting oak seeds (acorns) or seedlings that are obtained from the local genetic stock of the same species. We recommend a replacement rate of 5:1 for trees that are two inches or greater in diameter measured at breast height (dbh). We recommend a replacement rate of 1:1 for all trees less than 2 inches dbh. We recommend that every effort be made to retain large oaks. Oak plantings should be maintained for a period of five years. D. A five year maintenance and monitoring plan should be completed for all oak mitigation plantings.The monitoring plan should include appropriate irrigation schedules, as well as criteria for success and reestablishment during the five year period.Any trees planted as remedial action for failure of initial planting shall be monitored for five years in a simiar fashion to the initial planting. We recommend a minimum 80% success rate at the end of the five year monitoring period. 13. Show on the final map additional map sheet all agreed upon areas that are to be "No Development Zones". (see Tentative Map for locations) 14. Applicant must provide an agreement from the water company indicating an ability to supply the subdivision. 15. Applicant must provide an agreement from the sewer district indicating ability to serve the subdivision. 16. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Director of Development Services upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for an amendment. 6 u Count PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 August 30, 1993 Jeff Jarrett 24 San Ramon Chico, CA 95926 Re: Rezone, File 93-25 on AP No. 011-420-015 and 016 Dear Jeff: Thank you for your timely response to the suggested Mitigation Measures. We have no conflict with home construction year-round, if you choose to do so. The only limitation is to the soil disruption. As long as the disturbed area are stabilized and revegetated by November 1, and no additional cuts are made, we are in agreement. The removal of plant material under the direction of an approved botanist is also acceptable. Having a botanist involved in the process can only be beneficial to providing appropriate Mitigation Measures. It seems to me we are in complete agreement. I will, at this time, continue processing the application. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Sin (ely, Li Purvis Wilson Associate Planner LPW:bd cc: NorthStar Engineering, Mike McEnespy 15_-v1;i- aid i Inter-Departmental Memorandum TO: Stu FROM: LPW SUBJECT: Jarrett Rezone (PUD), AP No. 011-420-015, 016 DATE: August 30, 1993 Attached is Planning's list of Mitigation Measures and suggested conditions. At this time we are ready for the Development Review Committee hearing. If Environmental Health is ready, please schedule. LPW Jeff Jarrett Rezone (PUD) Conditions (Planning) m r County Code is required with a minimum of 500 1. A pressurized water system pe ty eq gallons per minute fire flow. 2. Three fire hydrants (6") are required, spaced at a maximum of 800' apart. The locations of the hydrants will be coordinated with the fire department. 3. All dwellings and access must meet the Fire Safe Regulations of Public Resources Code 4290. 4. All green space/open space areas to be preserved must be cleared of underbrush to prevent a wildfire from reaching the structures, excepting the no-disturbance zones as identified by the project Botanist. 5. A homeowners association or some other means must be generated to guarantee yearly maintenance of the water system and the green space/open space clearance. 6. Vista La Mesa Drive will be open to Rim Rock Drive for a second access. 7. Lots 5 through 13: all overhangs, including decks, will be enclosed with non- combustible construction on the canyon sides. 8. A development impact fee for Sheriff Facilities shall be paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article II of the Butte County Code, prior to issuance of building permits or Use Permit in the case of a mobile home park. Said fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the , building permit or Use Permit. 9. Any street lighting installed shall be directed away from the Skyway and shall shield traffic from any undue glare. 10. Drains used to accomodate surface drainage should be underground drains to jgrade. Catchment basins and culverts shall be installed no lower than the bottom of the drains. Main flow drains that will receive down stream drainage from this project shall be to grade and maintained free of emergent vegetation. A provision for continued maintenance to prevent the growth of emergent vegetation should be included in the homeowners association. 11. Power transformers shall be the above-ground pad type, as opposed to the below- ground vault type, transformers. Vault type transformers often hold water in areas with marginal soil percolation and create a mosquito breeding habitat that is difficult to control with conventional mosquito control methods. 12. Meet the requirements of the Department of Fish and Game for the preservation of oak trees: A. Individual trees or groups of trees that are retained as a function of project design shall be fully protected both during and.after construction. In order to protect the root zone during construction a root protection zone (RPZ) shall be established using protective fencing. The RPZ shall be an area that is 1.5 times the distance from the trunk to the dripline. Within this protective buffer, no grading, trenching, fill, or vegetation alteration of any kind shall be allowed. B. Following project construction, a fact sheet describing the value and care of native oaks should be distributed to all residents. At a minimum, this fact sheet should encourage homeowners to avoid unnecessary pruning and encourage, except where a safety hazard, the retention of all snags. C. Individual trees that are unavoidably lost due to project implementation should be replaced by planting oak seeds (acorns) or seedlings that are obtained from the local genetic stock of the same species. We recommend a replacement rate of 5:1 for trees that are two inches or greater in diameter measured at breast height (dbh). We recommend a replacement rate of 1:1 for all trees less than 2 inches dbh. We recommend that every effort be made to retain large oaks. Oak plantings should be maintained for a period of five years. D. A five year maintenance and monitoring plan should be completed for all oak mitigation plantings. The monitoring plan should include appropriate irrigation schedules, as well as criteria for success and reestablishment during the five year period. Any trees planted as remedial action for failure of initial planting shall be monitored for five years in a similar fashion to the initial planting. We recommend a minimum 80% success rate at the end of the five year monitoring period. 13. Show on the final map additional map sheet all agreed upon areas that are to be "No Development Zones". (see Tentative Map for locations) 14. Applicant must provide an agreement from the water company indicating an ability to supply the subdivision. 15. Applicant must provide an agreement from the sewer district indicating ability to serve the subdivision. 16. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Director of Development Services upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for an amendment. Mitigation Measures 1. Place a note on the final map stating "All buildings shall have Class A roofs." 2. A 100' building setback line from the south property line, along the Skyway, is required. An 8' solid masonry wall with landscaping along the Skyway may be used to reduce this setback to 50'. 3. Construction site preparation and soil disruption shall be limited to the dry season, May 1 through November 1. Mulch protect, replant or hydroseed all disturbed slopes greater than 10% that are of erodible, material, or have been cleared of vegetation. 4. Revegetate all disturbed areas as soon as possible. Revegetation must be done before the beginning of the normal rain season (November 1). 5. The northern portion and the small bluff area of the parcel shall be designated as no-development zones. The no-development zones are shown as the shaded areas on the subdivision map. No .development shall include no landscaping, decks, construction, soil disruption or vegetation removal. A note to this effect shall be included on the additional map sheet and in the CC&R's. This is to preserve the habitat of the Butte County checkerbloom, a rare and endangered species, and the Butte County fritillary, a threatened species. 6. Prior to 'recordation of the final map, a botanist shall locate the population(s) of the Butte County fritillary and the possible location(s) of the Butte County checkerbloom and indicate the appropriate protective setback areas for no- disturbance zones on the final map. A copy of the Botanist's findings shall be given to the Planning Division. LPW:bd • APPENDIX I .......................................................................... ............................... ....... ..................... ... .... .... ......... .... .............................. ... ... ....... ... .. .... .............. . ...................... ..... .... .. ............................. ......................... .......... ...............%-................................. ...... . ........ .............. .... ............... ............... ................ ..... .. .. ........ .......... . . ........ ......... ........ ......... ....... ................... ... ........ .................................. . ........ ...................................... .................. ................ .......................................%.%........%.........................%.................................. X. ................................................................. ...................................................... .......... ... .... ...... .......... ............. ...... ...... .........................................................%.........%.............................. ...................................... ...................................................... ........ ....... ...... ................:XX. X ............. ........................ ....................... % ................ ........................ ............... ................................ .................... ................. .... .:................... .... .......................... .... ............. .............................. - :,::. ..................... >;::.::::.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.> 4-d. ............. ...........I........... ........ ...... ................... ...... .......... .... ........... .........................................:::::::: .. ....0..... ....... .......... ............................ . .. ................... X....... ......... .. ...... ................... ... ..... .".............................. ................ ............ ..... .......................... .......... 0 :::::: . ,: ::: ....... ......... NMENTAL`*�i�Z RM" ........... HECKLISV: ............... ............... ....... ...... ... ..... ..... ........................ ...................................... : ....... ............ :: .......... . ... .............................»:::::>::::>::::>:::::::::>. ........... ...............................................................X.:...XXX. . ........................................................... ............ ................... .. ......................................................X . ...... ..........X. ........ ............. . . ...................... ..... ....... ..................... ............. ........... ....... ....... ..... ............................... ......................................- ...... 'T .................................. ::EVVAL-UA- ON. 0 .............. N.V..I ...........X.: ................................. ................................................... ......... .................... . ...... ............. ......... 0: ........ ..................... ... ..... ...................... ............................. ...... ...... ............. . ......... .......... ........ . .... ....... ............. File No. 93-25 AP No.011-420-015,016 I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Jeff Jarrett 2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable): 24 San Ramon, Chico CA 95926 3. Project description: Rezone of 13.3 acres from U and S-H to "PUD" and TPM to create 13 parcels with common area. YES MAYBE NO DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION II . MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE._, 1 Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality X This proposal will not significantly degrade the environment. of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory? 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term X This proposal will not impede long-term environmental goals. benefits to the detriment of long-term environment goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while long-term impacts will endure into the future.) 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually X T hi sproposal will not have a significant cumulative impact on the limited but cumulatively considerable? (A project may environment. impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource i s relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will X This proposal will not have a significant adverse effect on human beings. cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I/WE find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I/WE find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MEASURES described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I/WE find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. COUNTY OF BUTTE-ALA-KNING DATE: August 9, 1993 By: = u-), Lisa Purvi W�*l 16 Reviewed by: al('4� f: h kli t<;::... Ev lu t� n:: f:>Envic nm n ;>::.>:::>::::>::::::::::>.:::;:: :>::::>:>:.> :;:<::::.>:::.::::> :. AV onme...aa. C ec..:: s..:..:::.:.. ....a.....a...:o.:..::o o..::: a tal.lm act.....:.. .. ..........................::.:...:::...:....:::::.:.:.:::::.::.:. :.:..:.::...::.::::::...::::....::.; P.::::.::.:.........:::::::::. ::::::::::::::...:::::...:...::::.:...:.::::::::::::::::.::.::.::...::::::::::::::.:::::::.:........:::::.:. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS YES MAYBE NO DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant: a. Unstable earth conditions, or changes in geologic X The proposal will not affect subsurface earth conditions. substructures? b. Disruption, displacement, compaction or X This proposal will result in some disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of the soil? overcovering of the site as a result of development of structures, driveways, parking areas, etc. However, this is not anticipated to be significant. The erosion potential for this site is low or slight. When the soil is disrupted, the erosion hazard will increase significantly due to vegetation removal and slopes near the canyon rim. Any disruption of the soil should be done during the months of May through October, and exposed areas stabilized before winter rains to reduce erosion impacts. C. Change in topography or ground surface relief X The proposal will not affect topography because the building site is nearly features? level, d. Destruction, covering or modification of any X The site has no unique physical features. unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, X The proposal may cause some erosion due to disruption, displacement, either on or off site? compaction and overcovering of the site. See response to I.b. f. Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, X The proposal may result in some siltation, deposition or erosion of area orchanges in siltation, deposition or erosion drainage ways. Appropriate setbacks and construction standards will be which may modify the channel of a river or stream required. or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils X This proposal does not represent a significant loss of prime agricultural outside designated urban areas? soils. h. Exposure of people or property to geologic X All of Butte County- is in a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, Subject property is located approximately 1 mile from the Foothill Shear mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards? Zone. A geologic assessment of the site has been performed. Construction of buildings to Uniform Building Code standardswillprovide adequate protection to occupants in case of seismic activity. 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air X The proposal will not affect air quality because the increase in the number quality? of vehicle trips is not significant. b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or X The proposal will not create objectionable odors, smoke or fumes. fumes? C. Alteration of air movement, moisture or X The proposal will not affect the atmosphere. temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction X The proposal will not change the current or course of direction of water of water movements in either marine or fresh bodies. waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, X The proposal may result in an increase in surface water runoff due to reduced or the rate and amount of surface runoff? absorption from impervious surfaces, and in a change in the drainage pattern on the site. However, no significant adverse impacts are anticipated because drainage requirements of Butte County Public Works will mitigate any adverse impacts. 3 h kl� -:<:::::.Ev I n.:. E n E n 1. C st.. ... uati f. nviro n n :.:<.::.:::. v�.r..onme..ta..... ... ec.... . ... ... ...a.. . o ....o..::. a tal:lm :act.:.. .::.:::::....:::::::.::. ::::::.:::.....:::.::.:::......:::::................................................................. P.: :::::::::::.::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::: .;:::::::::::.::.;:.::.:::::::.>:.:: 11 c. Need for off-site surface drainage improvements, X The project will have to provide a permanent solution for drainage, approved including vegetation removal, channelization or by Butte County Public Works. culvert installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood X The proposal will not significantly affect any flood control channels or waters? watercourses. e. Change in the amount of surface water in any X The proposal will not affect any watercourse. water body? f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any X The proposal may affect surface water quality due to siltation resulting from alteration of surface water quality, including erosion caused by road and driveway construction and grading of building but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen sites. This should riot be a significant effect due to the u_se of standard. or turbidity? construction practices to minimize erosion. - - - -- - -- — - - g. - - -Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X The proposal will not affect the direction or flow of ground waters. ground waters? h. Change in the quantity or quality of ground X The proposal will not directly affect any aquifer. waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise X The project will not result in a reduction of water availability. available for public water supplies? j. Exposure of people or property to water-related X The proposal will not expose people or property to flooding. hazards such as flooding? 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of X There are known rare or endangered plant species in the immediate area. The any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, canyon rim provides suitable habitat for Bidwell's knotweed, depauperate milk grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? vetch, Butte County checkerbloom, Butte County fritillary and possibly Shippee meadow foam. A botanical survey has been performed on this site. Mitigation measures have been suggested in the survey. It is important that non-native vegetation not be allowed to encroach into the habitat for these rare or endangered species. b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X see response to 4.a. endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an X see response to 4.a. area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X The site does not contain any agricultural crops and is presently undeveloped. 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers X The proposal will not affect animal life because the site does not support of any species of animals (birds, land animals significant animal life or habitat. including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or X The site contains no rare animals. endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an X The proposal will not affect existing animal life. area, or in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? »::; 4 1.:: *.:. Env�ronrne.:.ta...0 .ec.. .s. ...... .......ua onoEn:.:.ronmental:::lm :act...::.::::.......................................................................:::::......:.::.:: ::..:.::.:..: :::::::::::::. P::::::::.>::. ::.::::: ...... :::: d. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife X The site contains no significant wildlife habitat. habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X The proposal will not result in a suhstential increase in noise created on site or in the vicinity. b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X The primary noise factor will be the exposure of people to noise from traffic, on the Skyway. Noise levels in excess of 70 dB can be expected within 100' of the roadway. The Butte County Noise Element indicates noise levels up to 60 dB LON are normally acceptable for low density residential uses. Noise levels up to 70 dB LDN are conditionally acceptable if noise reduction features are incorporated into the project. 7. _ LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce significant - X The proposal may result in an increase in light or glare created on site or light and glare? in the vicinity, if street lighting is planned for this project. 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial X The proposal will not alter the land use in the area. alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural X The proposal will not affect any natural resources. resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? X The proposal will not deplete any natural resources. 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous X The proposal will not involve the use of hazardous materials, nor is located substances (including, but not limited to, oil, close to any facilities which store or utilize such materials. pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response X The proposal will not affect any emergency services. plan or emergency evacuation plan? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter location, X The proposal will not significantly affect the population of the area because distribution, density or growth rate of the human the capacity for densities greater than 1 unit per acre does not exist in population? this area. 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or X The proposal will not significantly affect housing demand. create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle X The proposal will represent an incremental increase in traffic in the area. movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand X The proposal will not affect parking because the proposal will have to comply for new parking? with the parking requirements contained within Butte County Code section 24- 35. C. Substantial impact on existing transportation X The proposal will represent an increase in congestion and maintenance systems? requirements on area roads. d. Significant alterations to present patterns of X The proposal will not alter the present pattern of circulation in the area. circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X The proposal will not affect rail or air traffic. ...................................... ..... ........ ...... ....... ..................................... ............... ..................... .................... ............... ..... ...... X :-:i� ... ...................... ........ ....... ........................ ................... ::,a X ......................... ......................... ........ ........ .. ..............:..X.....x..X........x.X.....x.X.x.X.....`...X...:. . ,..::..:..:....:-..:..:...:...:...:..:-..:..:.-..:-..:-..:.:..-:..-.:..-.:.-.:.-.:.-.:-.:..........................................%......* ....................................... ................ ..... ............................. .. .............................:...:....:...,. ............................. ...... .........%........ ......... ......::..::.::"......:.:.:... ................................................................................. IEnMonmentAChecMM . ....... .......... .. ... . >::>::>::>:::>:>:.>:>:.......E. . k fidn . M ...................... ... .................. f Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, X The proposal will result in an incremental increase in traffic and related bicyclists or pedestrians? traffic hazards in the area. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services: a. Fire protection? X The project is located in an area with an extreme fire hazard. The proposal will result in a incremental increase in demand for fire protection in the area. The Butte County Fire Department/California Department of Forestry has submitted a list of requirements for this specific project, including a pressurized water system with hydrants and construction restrictions. Most of these requirements will be conditions for project approval. b. Police protection? X A development impact fee for Sheriff's Facilities shall be paid purusant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article II of the Butte County Code, prior to issuance of buiding permits or use permit in the case of a mobile home park. Said fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permit or use permit. C. Schools? X The proposal will result in a incremental increase in demand for school services in the area which will be mitigated by the payment of development impact fees for the school district. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X The proposal will result in a incremental increase in demand for park and recreation facilities in the area. a. Maintenance of public facilities, including X The proposal will result in a incremental increase in the need for roads? maintenance of roads and other public facilities in the area. f. Other governmental services? X The proposal will result in a incremental increase in demand for all other governmental services in the area. 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? - X The proposal will not utilize substantial fuel or energy. b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing - X The proposal will not substantially increase the demand for energy. sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power or natural gas? - X The proposal will not affect electrical power or natural gas distribution systems. b. Communications systems? - X The proposal will not affect communication systems. C. Water availability? - X The proposal will not affect public water systems. d. Sewer or septic systems? - X The proposal will have to meet the requirements of the Butte County Environmental Health Dept. e. Storm water drainage? - X The proposal will have to provide a permanent solution for drainage. f. Solid waste and disposal? - X The proposal will not affect solid waste disposal. 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential hazard X The proposal will not create any health hazard. (excluding mental health)? ...................... .........-- .. ........ .......... ... ............... ............. ............... .... ........... ...................... ............................. ................................ ............ X:..... ....... ................ ................. ....... X. ............. ............. ... ............. ............. ........................ *,...:*- *:::*::.:.:*.:" . ..::::: X. .......... ............... ........... ....... X ................ X ,:..:::::>::>:.>::::>:::::::::..: .:.::>::::::::::>:::::>:::. 10"'h-::" "Envirohm SnAronme . ... .. ... ................. ............... .............. ...... ........ .... .... .... .............................................. ............. ........ ........ . ............................................... .................................................... kh .................................................. .............. ..... . ............................................. .................. .................................................. .. . ............... ... ............................ .............. ................................................ .......... ....................%-.................................................................... . ................................................ . ................................................... b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X The proposal will not expose people to any health hazard. 18. AESTHETICS.iWill the proposal result in the obstruction X— The proposal will not result in an aesthetically offensive view because it of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the is consistent with surrounding development. proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to the public view? 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the X This proposal will not result in an impact on the quality or quantity of quality orquantity of existing recreational opportunities? existing recreational opportunities in the area. 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration or X An archaeological site study has been performed on this property and destruction of a prehistoric or historic clearance has been recommended. archaeological site? b. =Will the proposal result in adVWT':;e physical or X The proposal will not affect historic sites. aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a X The proposal will not affect cultural resources. physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or X The proposal will not affect religious resources. sacred uses within the potential impact area? * , .:: v�ronmentaU.]C:ecklist:::::.:EValuatlon::.of..:Env�ronmental...im act....................................................:::::.:::.:::.::::::::::::................. ...................................... V. SUGGESTED MITIGATION MEASURES 1. Place a note on the final map stating "All buildings shall have Class A roofs." 2. A 100' building setback line from the south property line, along the Skyway, is required. An 8' solid masonry wall with landscaping along the Skyway may be used to reduce this setback to 50'. 3. Construction site preparation and soil disruption shall be limited to the dry season, May 1 through November 1. Mulch protect, replant or hydroseed all - _ disturbed slopes. greater than -10%- that are -of- - - -- - --- - - erodible material, or have been cleared of vegetation. 4. Revegetate all disturbed areas as soon as possible. Revegetation must be done before the beginning of the normal rain season (November 1). 5. The northern portion and the small bluff area of the parcel shall be designated as no-development zones. The no-development zones are shown as the shaded areas on the subdivision map. No development shall include no landscaping, decks, construction, soil disruption or vegetation removal. A note to this effect shall be included on the additional map sheet and in the CC&R's. This is to preserve the habitat of the Butte County checkerbloom, a rare and endangered species, andthe Butte County fritillary, a threatened species. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map, a botanist shall locate the population(s) of the Butte County fritillary and the possible location(s) of the Butte County checkerbloom and indicate the appropriate protective setback areas for no-disturbance zones on the final map. A copy of the Botanist's findings shall be given to the Planning Division. I 8 ecki�st :::::::Evaluation...of::.En�ironmental:.im act :::::::::.::.............................................. ........::.::::::..................................:.:....................... P:.::::.; ::.::.::.;:.:;:.::.;:.::.::.;:.::.::<.;::::.::<.::.::.::.:; DATA SHEET • A. Project Description 7. Air Quality: Good _ 1. Type of Project: Rezone and Subdivision Map Biological Environment: 2. Brief Description: 13.3 acres currently zoned U and S-H to be rezoned to "PUD" and divided into 13 parcels and common area. 8. Vegetation: Scattered oaks, digger pines, grasslands, rare plant communities have been identified on site. 3. Location: On the north side of the Skyway, on Vista La Mesa Drive and Rim Rock Drive. 9. Wildlife Habitat: Foothill oak woodland, provides some habitat for birds and small mammals. 4. Proposed Density of Development: 1 dwelling unit per acre Cultural Environment: 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Minimal. 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: High 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Vista La Mesa Dr., Rim Rock Dr., sensitivity urea. the Skyway. 7. Nethod of Sewage Disposal: CSA 21. 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Agricultural Residential 12. Existing Zoning: U and S-H 8. Source of Water Supply: Gran Mutual Water Co. 13. Existing Land Use on-site: Formerly a restaurant, currently 9. Proximity of Power Lines: To property. undeveloped. 10. Potential for further land divisions and development: None under 14. Surrounding Area: existing zoning. a. Land Uses: Residential, Undeveloped b. Zoning: U, S-H, R-1, FR-5 B. Environmental Setting C. Gen. Plan Designation: Ag-Resi, Low Density and Grazing & Open lands Physical Environment: d. Parcel Sizes: 1.5 to 25+ acres 1. Terrain e. Population: lightly populated a. General Topographic Character: Sloping ridge top to steep 15. Character of Site and Area: rural canyon wall. b. Slopes: 1-20% 16. Nearest Urban Area: Chico, 2.5 miles west C. Elevation: 370-470 feet above sea level. d. Limiting Factors: slopes near bluff 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: CSA 21 2. Soils 18. Improvements Standards Urban Area: no A. Types and Characteristics: Toomes soil series 4-20" deep, gravelly loam soils, volcanic brecca origin, 25-50% surface 19. Fire Protection Service: rock. a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Station @42 b. Limiting Factors: rocky, shallow approximately 5 miles. b. Water Availability: Hydrants in both adjacent 3. Natural Hazards of the Land subdivisions. a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity zone VIII. b. Erosion Potential: none 20. Schools in Area: Chico Unified School District. C. Landslide Potential: none to low J. Fire Hazard: extreme e. Expansive Soil Potential: low 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water: Butte Creek, approximately 2000' to the - north. b. Ground Water: deep aquifers C. Drainage Characteristics: drains primarily to Butte Creek d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 28 inches per year. a. Limiting Factors: absorption capacity of soils S. Visual/Scenic Quality: excellent canyon views 6. Acoustic Quality: high ambient noise levels near the Skyway, low to moderate elsewhere. ............................................... ........................ ..... ... ........ X X ... ...*........*.... ............ .......................................... ... ... ....... ........................................................................................... ...................xxxxx' ............. ................................... . ........... ................................................ ... ............... ......................................... . .....................................................I.................. ....... ....%. ........ ...X:.......................... ............................... .........%.............. ............................................................ :::.......... ............................ ........ .................................... .... ...... ... ............................ ....... ................ ................. ... ..... ...... ............. .............. ...... ........... ..... ...... U.*"! 'eck-11-tw.- Ev t t""""Wi*. ii� nvi . . .... ..... EnVironmeh.w Ch""" 5 ::::::: ....... ...... ..........-......... ....... b E ......ron.m. ............................. ........ ............ ....... .... ........... ................ .................. ....... ............................... ........... . .......... ................................ ............ ................................ ....... ............................. ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. 12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: 2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Butte County Planning Department, 1987. Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety element. oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate maps. Federal Emergency 3. Butte County Planning department. Subsidence and Management Agency, 1989. Landslide-Potential-Map 111-1,- Safety Element-. oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 14. USGS Quad Maps, Hamlin Canyon, CA Photorevised 1969 4. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: 15. Soil Map, chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) CH2M Hill, 1977. Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3, Safety element. oroville, CA: CH2M 16. Soil Survey of Chico (1925) /Oroville Hill, 1977. (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Noise element Map IV-1, Scenic Highway element. Oroville, CA- 17. Butte County Planning Department. Butte CH2M Hill, 1977. County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map. Butte county fire 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Department and California Department of Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: Forestry, 1989. CH2M Hill, 1977. a. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard classes Map 111-4, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Man. Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Map. Oroville, CA 11. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency, State of California, 1983. y r ,• e L Jeff Jarrett Rezone (PUD.) Conditions (PPLq-t rs 1 t4y) 1. A pressurized water system per County Code is required with a minimum of 500 gallons per minute fire flow. 2. Three fire hydrants (6") are required, spaced at a maximum of 800' apart. The locations of the hydrants will be coordinated with the fire department. 3. All dwellings and access must meet the Fire Safe Regulations of Public Resources Code 4290. 4. All green space/open space areas to be preserved must be cleared of underbrush to prevent a wildfire from reaching the structures, excepting the no-disturbance zones as identified by the project Botanist. 5. A homeowners association or some other means must be generated to guarantee yearly maintenance of the water system and the green space/open space clearance. 6. Vista La Mesa Drive will be open to Rim Rock Drive for a second access. 7. Lots 5 through 13: all overhangs, including decks, will be enclosed with non- combustible construction on the canyon sides. 8. A development impact fee for Sheriff Facilities shall be paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article II of the Butte County Code, prior to issuance of building permits or Use Permit in the case of a mobile home park. Said fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permit or Use Permit. 9. Any street lighting installed shall be directed away from the Skyway and shall shield traffic from any undue glare. 10. Drains used to accomodate surface drainage should be underground drains to grade. Catchment basins and culverts shall be installed no lower than the bottom of the drains. Main flow drains that will receive down stream drainage from this project shall be to grade and maintained free of emergent vegetation. A provision for continued maintenance to prevent the growth of emergent vegetation should be included in the homeowners association. 11. Power transformers shall be the above-ground pad type, as opposed to the below- ground vault type, transformers. Vault type transformers often hold water in areas with marginal soil percolation and create a mosquito breeding habitat that is difficult to control with conventional mosquito control methods. 12. Meet the requirements of the Department of Fish and Game for the preservation of oak trees: A. Individual trees or groups of trees that are retained as a function of project t a design shall be fully protected both during and after construction. In order to protect the root zone during construction a root protection zone (RPZ) shall be established using protective fencing. The RPZ shall be an area that is 1.5 times the distance from the trunk to the dripline. Within this protective buffer, no grading, trenching, fill, or vegetation alteration of any kind shall be allowed. B. Following project construction, a fact sheet describing the value and care of native oaks should be distributed to all residents. At a minimum, this fact sheet should encourage homeowners to avoid unnecessary pruning and encourage, except where a safety hazard., the retention of all snags. C. Individual trees that are unavoidably lost due to project implementation should be replaced by planting oak seeds (acorns) or seedlings that are obtained from the local genetic stock of the same species. We recommend a replacement rate of 5:1 for trees that are two inches or greater in diameter measured at breast height (dbh). We recommend a replacement rate of 1:1 for all trees less than 2 inches dbh. We recommend that every effort be made to retain large oaks. Oak plantings should be maintained for a period of five years. D. A five year maintenance and monitoring plan should be completed for all oak mitigation plantings.The monitoring plan should include appropriate irrigation, schedules, as well as criteria for success and reestablishment during the five year period. Any trees planted as remedial action for failure of initial planting shall be monitored for five years in a similar fashion to the initial planting. We recommend a minimum 80% success rate at the end of the five year monitoring period._ 13. Show on the final map additional map sheet all agreed upon areas that are to be "No Development Zones". (see Tentative Map for locations) 14. Applicant must provide an agreement from the water company indicating an ability to supply the subdivision. 15. Applicant must provide an agreement from the sewer district indicating ability to serve the subdivision. 16. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Director of Development Services upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for an amendment. Jeff Jarrett Rezone (PUD) Conditions (JLC t 0 6)) 1. A pressurized water system per County Code is required with a minimum of 500 gallons per minute fire flow. 2. Three fire hydrants (6") are required, spaced at a maximum of 800' apart. The locations of the hydrants will be coordinated with the fire department. 3. All dwellings and access must meet the Fire Safe Regulations of Public Resources Code 4290. 4. All green space/open space areas to be preserved must be cleared of underbrush to prevent a wildfire from reaching the structures, excepting the no-disturbance zones as identified by the project Botanist. 5. A homeowners association or some other means must be generated to guarantee yearly maintenance of the water system and the green space/open space clearance. 6. Vista La Mesa Drive will be open to Rim Rock Drive for a second access. 7. Lots 5 through 13: all overhangs, including decks, will be enclosed with non- combustible construction on the canyon sides. 8. A development impact fee for Sheriff Facilities shall be paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article II of the Butte County Code, prior to issuance of building permits or Use Permit in the case of a mobile home park. Said fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permit or Use Permit. 9. Any street lighting installed shall be directed away from the Skyway and shall shield traffic from any undue glare. 10. Drains used to accomodate surface drainage should be underground drains to grade. Catchment basins and culverts shall be installed no lower than the bottom of the drains. Main flow drains that will receive down stream drainage from this project shall be to grade and maintained free of emergent vegetation. A provision for continued maintenance to prevent the growth of emergent vegetation should be included in the homeowners association. 11. Power transformers shall be the above-ground pad type, as opposed to the below- ground vault type, transformers. Vault type transformers often hold water in areas with marginal soil percolation and create a mosquito breeding habitat that is difficult to control with conventional mosquito control methods. 12. Meet the requirements of the Department of Fish and Game for the preservation of oak trees: A. Individual trees or groups of trees that are retained as a function of project h ], design shall be fully protected both during and after construction. In order to protect the root zone during construction a root protection zone (RPZ) shall be established using protective fencing. The RPZ shall be an area that is 1.5 times the distance from the trunk to the dripline. Within this protective buffer, no grading, trenching, fill, or vegetation alteration of any kind shall be allowed. B. Following project construction, a fact sheet describing the value and care of native oaks should be distributed to all residents. At a minimum, this fact sheet should encourage homeowners to avoid unnecessary pruning and encourage, except where a safety hazard, the retention of all snags. C. Individual trees that are unavoidably lost due to project implementation should be replaced by planting oak seeds (acorns) or seedlings that are obtained from the local genetic stock of the same species. We recommend a replacement rate of 5:1 for trees that are two inches or greater in diameter measured at breast height (dbh). We recommend a replacement rate of 1:1 for all trees less than 2 inches dbh. We recommend that every effort be made to retain large oaks. Oak plantings should be maintained for a period of five years. D. A five year maintenance and monitoring plan should be completed for all oak mitigation plantings.The monitoring plan should include appropriate irrigation schedules, as well as criteria for success and reestablishment during the five year period. Any trees planted as remedial action for failure of initial planting shall be monitored for five years in a similar fashion to the initial planting. We recommend a minimum 80% success rate at the end of the five year monitoring period. 13. Show on the final map additional map sheet all agreed upon areas that are to be "No Development Zones". (see Tentative Map for locations) 14. Applicant must provide an agreement from the water company indicating an ability to supply"the subdivision. 15. Applicant must provide an agreement from the sewer district indicating ability to serve the subdivision. 16. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Director of Development Services upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for an amendment. A_2 els , ofd 9 JARRETT CONSTRUCTION 24 SAN RAMON DR CHICO, CA. 95926 CSL. #569648 Ph.# (916) .343-8217 Butte County Planning ATTN:Lisa Purvis Wilson 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA.95965 In response to your letter regarding the Suggested Mitigation Measure. After consulting with the engineer, Mike Meckenepsi,we find them,one thru six,for the most part to be satisfactory but would like to address a couple of concerns. First,we would like to remove dead trees and brush in the center berm/small bluff' area along with the poison oak which grows in that area. We would do this under the supervision of an agreed upon independent botanist. Second,we would:like to be able to build year round leaving soil disturbances to the dry season,IE.road cutting,foundation digging and pouring,etc..This would alow the remainder of construction of the private residences to continue as long as the foundation and drive way cut in is completed by Nov. 1. For the most part we accept such measures and invite your comments as to the above paragraph. THP,NK YO , AEF TI,owner date WHO Planning Department , AUG 2 6 1993 Orovl-,11%California PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 August 10, 1993 Jeff Jarrett 24 San Ramon Chico, CA 95926 Re: Rezone, File 93-25 Dear Mr. Jarrett: An initial study of your proposed project, a Rezone from "U" and S-H to PUD for property located on the north side of Skyway, Chico, indicates potentially adverse impacts to the environment (refer to the enclosed environmental checklist). To reduce or eliminate these impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required as part of the project. Otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. An early response to this notification, sent to the Planninig Department, will expedite the scheduling of your project. Please forward your written response within 15 days from the date of this letter. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between. Sincerely, Paula S. Leasure Assistant Director of Planning Lisa Purvis Wilson Associate Planner LPW:lr Enc. cc: NorthStar Engineering Eutte Department of Development Services PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 August 10, 1993 Chico Unified School District 1163 East Seventh Street Chico, CA 95928-5999 RE: Rezone, File 93-25 Gentlemen: This Department has received and reviewed the school district's letter dated July 1, 1993. This letter is directed to the following approval requested under consideration by this department: Rezone to PUD (Planned Unit Development). Your district seeks to condition the granting of the approval request upon the imposition of school facility impact measures in excess of those provided by the School Facilities Law of 1986 ("SFL"). This department considers the requested approval action to be "adjudicatory" as opposed to "legislative". It is the position of the Department that due to the limitations imposed by the SFL, no mitigation measures in excess of those provided by the SFL may be imposed as conditions upon the granting of the action under condition. Murrieta Valley Unified School District v. City of Riverside (1991) 228 Cal.App.3d 1212; William S. Hart Union High School District v. Regional Planning Commission of the County of Los Angeles (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1612; Mira Development Corp. v. City of San Diego (1988) 205 Cal.App.3d 1201. Based on the case law cited, we believe that this Department is precluded from considering your proposed mitigation conditions regarding the subject action which is under consideration as they seek to impose impact measures beyond and in excess of those provided in the SFL; this Department, therefore, rejects the imposition of your proposed conditions on that basis. ti If you believe that our evaluation and analysis is incorrect, please contact Gregory P. Einhorn, Chief Deputy County Counsel at 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, (916) 538- 7621. Sincerely, Paula S. Leasure Assistant Director of Planning Lisa Purvis Wilson Associate Planner LPW:lr Gran Mutual Water Co. 105 Broadway Chico, California 95926 (916) 342-0195 & e�aertt . a went August 3 , 1993 AUG 0 0993' ►, pia OrorItW fid";"Wrila Butte County Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 RE: Rezone to PUD AP# 011-420-015 ,• 016 Jeff Jarrett Dear Ladies or Gentlemen: Attached please find your letter with our comments included. We apologize for our delay in responding to your letter. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sinc re Sy Lucena President Enclosure --' B. COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS; 1 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 -4 Planning Department (916) 538-7601 AUG n 6 1993 TO: ` �y2G DATE: JUNE 25, 1993 tU6 ` day RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION JEFF 'JARRETT Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: REZONE TO PTTT1 AP#011-42(1-015, 016 13.32 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SKYWAY AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SKYWAY ' U AND CANYON RIM- PLACE, .CHICO, ZONED L S-H We are` making an assessment of possible environmental- impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either .a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) . Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above-noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, t.. Larry Pa' er Planning Technician Comments: Property currently has "one"' Share. Developer needs to meet with Water Company to come to an agreement regarding the expansion. An application would then need to be made to the California Dept 66 Corporation at the Developers expense to receive "Permit to issue Shares" for additional units . Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) . Yes No V,l < Memo to File Re: Jeff Jarrett Rezone/PUD 011-420-015, 016 File #93-25 Date: July 19, 1993 From: Lisa Purvis Wilson The requirements from Butte County Fire/CDF and the project Botanist, Dr. Kingsly Stern, are opposing each other. CDF wants the area cleared of brush to create a fire break in the open areas. The rare/endangered/threatened plants grow in these open space areas. After phone consultation with Dr. Stern, I think an acceptable alternative can be produced. The two plant species are: Butte County fritillary, observed onsite, and Butte County checkerbloom, not observed onsite but the habitat is extremely conducive to the species. Both plants are dormant at this time. The B.C. fritillary will survive with a minimum 10' protective setback area around each population. The B.C. checkerbloom will not survive any disturbance. The checkerbloom,is truly a rare species and must be protected. There is a known population on adjacent properties, but not on this site. If, prior to issuance of building permits, a botanist would confirm the location(s) of each fritillary and the possible location(s) of the checkerbloom to establish appropriate protective setbacks, within the open spaces, all will be happy. The project engineer was agreeable to my mitigation measure, per phonecom of this date. '� Sir-�-Js Lt ( vim Y 1 25 �}o Planning Department J U L 2 2 1993 Y LAND OF NA. TU RAL W E A L T H AND BEAUTY A CLEAN INDOOR AIR ENVIRONMENT FOR A HEALTHIER TOMORROW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH .18-8 County.Center Drive 1469 Humboldt Road 7 County Center Drive 747 Elliott Road OroviLle, CA 95965 Chico, CA 95928 Oroville,CA 95965 Paradise, CA 95969 (916)538-7282 (916)891-2727 (916)538-7281 (916)872-6308 FAX (916)538-2165 FAX (916)895-6512 . FAX (916)538-2140 July 20 , 1993 Jeff Jarrett RE: Rezone Request 24 San Ramon North side Skyway , Chico Chico, CA 95926 AP# 11-42-15 & 6 Dear Mr. Jarrett : The above application was received and reviewed by this department . The application is incomplete with respect to code and regulations that are the responsibility of Environmental Health. A review of detailed plans for sewage disposal and water supply is necessary prior to commenting on the project . Please submit this information at your earliest convenience so the project can be processed. If you have any questions , please contact me at the Chico office between 8 : 00am and 9 : 00am weekdays (except Wednesday) . Sin erely, — �—A' Frieda L . White, R.E.H. S. Division of Environmental Health FLW/gl cc : Planning Division Land Development Division NorthStar Engineering t,t^ � BUTTE COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT DISTRICT OFFICE AT 5117 LARKIN ROAD JAMES A.CAMY N.E.CORNER OF OROVILLE AIRPORT OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965 MANAGER ON LARKIN ROAD PHONE(916)533-6038 342-7350 FAX(916)534-9916 Planning Department July 9 , 1993 J U L 131993 Larry Painter, Planning Technician Oroville,California Butte County Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville , CA 95965-3397 Dear Larry Painter : We have made an on-site inspection of the Jarrett rezone to PUD (AP# 011-120-015 , 016 ) . Subdivisions such ass�is , often develop new mosquito breeding sources due to improper land development and/or inadequate drainage systems . This area has historically produced Aedes sierrensis , commonly called the Treehole Mosquito . This mosquito breeds in water holding cavities within Oak and other trees and is the primary vector of the parasite which causes dog heartworm. Land which is subdivided and thereby encourages urbanization in this area will result in an increased risk of this disease . Since it is difficult to foresee problems that may arise with the development of new subdivisions, we offer these suggestions as a way to prevent the production of mosquito sources in new developments . LopDvnDo rains used to accommodate surface drainage should be underground drains to grade . Catchment basins and culverts should be installed no lower than the bottom of the drains . Main-flow drains that will receive down stream drainage from this project should be to grade and maintained free of emergent vegetation. A provision for continued maintenance to prevent the growth of emergent vegetation should be included.a>P.G. &E ..' s CD10111ov_% power transformers should be the above ground "pad type" as opposed to the below ground "vault type" transformers . Vault type transformers often hold water in areas with marginal soil percolation and create a mosquito breeding habitat that is difficult to control with conventional mosquito control methods . We request as a condition of approval that all transformers be pad mounted above ground. P.G. &E . has worked closely with us on this problem. Excavation test holes and depressions left by the development of properties should be filled and re-leveled to prevent water holding potholes from producing mosquitoes . Prospective property owners should be willing to assume responsibility in establishing good mosquito prevention practices as their properties are developed and used. These comments are consistent with the District ' s adopted policy called "Guidelines, Checklist and Standards for Vector Prevention in Proposed Developments" . If you have any questions regarding our suggestions or recommendations , please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, rl v son Regional Supervisor CP/km Jarrett B_ COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS' ` 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 (916) 538-7601 TO: _ DATE: JUNE 25, 1993 RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION JEFF `JARRETT Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: RF7.ONF Tn PTTs AP#011-42o-015, f116 13.32 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SKYWAY AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SKYWAY AND CANYON RIM PLACE; CHICO, ZONED U S-H i We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts .and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) . Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can-offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above-noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, Larry Pa' er Planning Technician Comments: Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental . document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) . Yes No 4Y STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCIPETE WILSON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME REGION 2 1701 NIMBUS ROAD, SUITE A RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 (916). 355-7020 Y Jul 8 1993 JUL 12 1993 Mr. Larry Painter 0'0v6118 Planning Department Caf�f ��a 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 Dear Mr. Painter: The Department of Fish and Game (DFG) has reviewed the Rezone to Planned Unit Development for APs 11 -420-15 and 16 ( 13 . 3 acres) , permitting division into 13 residential-7ofs.n� -L armed on the south rim of Butte Creek Canyon near Chico, Butte County, the project site lies in a blue oak woodland. area known to harbor sensitive plant species. This project site may contain sensitive plants which occur locally. A botanical survey should be performed during the flowering season (during spring or the appropriate period for potential occurrences) to determine if such species are present. Sensitive plant populations should be protected by: a. Establishing a 50-foot minimum no disturbance setback, commencing from the outer edge, around each plant population. b. Constructing barriers to prevent damage by foot and vehicle traffic. c. Excluding livestock. d. ' No artificial drainage into or the placement of materials and substances inside of the nondisturbance area. Oak and hardwood woodland habitats are a particularly important habitat because they provide most of the essential life sustaining requirements (e.g. , food, shelter, nesting and roosting) sites) needed by numerous animal species. There have been significant cumulative losses of oak woodlands in California due to residential, commercial, and other development projects. To mitigate any project impacts on hardwoods, losses should be mitigated according to the attached Draft Oak Protection Guidelines. Native vegetation should be- retained as mitigation' for habitat and species losses. Losses should be limited to those sites occupied by buildings, roads, utilities, etc. , or as may be OAK PROTECTION GUIDELINES_ The proposed project will significantly impact oak -trees on::the``. project site. We recommend that the project be designed -so that -- .: ... loss of oak trees which results in a loss of wildlife habitat value be avoided. If the loss of oaks is unavoidable'-then a mitigation plan should be developed which results in the retention, of a maximum number of oak trees and the the replacement of .oaks which are lost. The mitigation plan should contain the following: 1 . Individual trees or-groups of trees that are retained as a function of project design should be-fully protected both during and after construction. . In order to protect the root zone during construction a root protection zone (RPZ ) should be established using protective fencing. The RPZ should be an area that is 1 . 5 times the distance from the trunk to the dripline. Within this protective buffer, no grading, trenching; fill, or vegetation alteration of any kind should be allowed. 2 . Following project construction, a fact sheet describing the value and care of native oaks should F be distributed to all residents . At a minimum, this fact sheet should encourage homeowners to avoid unnecessary pruning and encourage, except where a safety hazard, the retention of snags . 3 . Individual trees that are unavoidably lost due to project implementation should be replaced by planting oak seeds (acorns) or seedlings that are obtained from the local genetic stock of the same species. We recommend a replacement rate of 5 : 1 for trees that are two inches or greater in diameter measured at breast height. (dbh) . We recommend a replacement rate of 1 : 1 for all trees less than two inches dbh. We recommend that every effort be made to retain large oaks . Oak plantings should be maintained for a period of five years . 4. A five-year Maintenance and Monitoring Plan should' be completed for all oak mitigation plantings. The monitoring plan should include appropriate irrigation . schedules, as well as -criteria for success and reestablishment during the five-year period.- Any trees planted as remedial action for failure of. ' initial planting shall be monitored for five years in a similar fashion to the initial planting. We recommend .a minimum 80 percent success rate at the end of the five-year monitoring period. Mr. Larry Painter July 8, 1993 Page Two needed to meet safety requirements. Project landscaping should utilize native vegetation. . This project will have an' impact to fish and/or wildlife habitat. Assessment of fees under Public Resources Code Section 21089 and as defined by Fish and Game Code Section 711 . 4 is necessary. Fees are payable by the project applicant upon filing of the. Notice of Determination by the lead agency. If the DFG can be of further assistance, please contact Mr. Ron Bertram, Senior Biologist at (916) 355-7010 or Mr. Jerry Mensch, Environmental Services Supervisor, at (916) 355-7030. S_incerel , L. y n �Broddr Regional Manager Attachment cc: Mr. Ron Bertram Department of Fish and Game Rancho Cordova, California Mr. Jerry Mensch Department of Fish and Game Rancho Cordova, California piapning Department MEMO J U L 1 5 1993 Corvine,Caiitomia TO: Planning Department -- attentionn: Lisa Purvis Wilson FROM: Stuart Edell, Manager Land Development Division I. SUBJECT: Jeff Jarrett proposed PUD Rezone, AP 11-42-15 & 16 DATE: July 15, 1993 The additional application, title report and other information has now been provided, and we are now in a position that will allow our Division to review this application for completeness pursuant to Government Code Section 65941. Stuart Edell Manager Land Development Division SE/ds 199 -3 r y a ` '�''7 ti•�J r n,1t, .1r• ., l .f7 �., 1, Y z t y`h.et �.SL•+1' . �r �?! ! F' d t�y�.` t •t T .'+l`y_r}YsY�'S O..0 .r. 1� J ...c! S ��,.Y 1 j•I...•. �/:}. 1 ; ^2 �.,ti x)'� l SURVEY' FOR THREATENED, ;RARE OR-ENDANGERED � • SPECIES•.,OF VASCULAR PLANTS .COHDVCTED ON ' 13.3 ACRES OF:FR0PERTY AT BURTON'S. MESA, NORTH-,OF.'TSE SKMAY, -BUTTS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA REPORT Prepared for Jerald: Jarrett . 1967 Skyway Chico, CA 95926 By Kingsley R. Stern, Ph.D. (; Consulting Botanist Department of Biological Sciences California State University Chico, CA 95929-0515 FOR TMtZATENED,'RARE,�OR`MMANGERED. SPECIES•O[r.;.V1ISCULIIR PLANTS�CONDUCTED'APRIL�.1e� 1989 ;ON 13:3.`1►CRES OL�;,BROPERTY' -i LOCATEDBURTON 3-MESA';. SOUTS OF,THE`.S1CYiiAY; iiiPROXIMATELY r,,MILES 4OUTHEAST OF C8IC0, BUTTE COUNTY; ;CALIFORNIA'.-.. :,• Rey.. ;Tti0?project• site is located on a combination of Valley ;,'Grassland and Foothill Woodland habitats. Some surface scouring of parts •of the Valley Grassland area has taken place in the pa'st, •but tle native flora has become reestablished— An abandoned restaurant is located in the northwest portion of the site;,along ;with•:an._associated. paved parking lot, of tconsidurable ; .. extent 'situated-primarily,to'•the.south 'of•the building..' Access to the site, which,is located it few miles southeast of Chico, is via the Skyway, which forms its southern boundary. An entrance road forms part .of the western boundary,.'and a bluff overlooking Butte Creek constitutes the northern boundary. `:Just south of the bluff is another small bluff that is only a few feet in height. A short unimproved,trail extends from near the entrance,road to a flat. area between the bluffs. Despite`, the;'scouring"and acti'vitp,.once';associated:Kith thea ,,.- restaurant,"=;the native ,flora:r:on•:the,:,site:is;unusually rich and.` , s rela't, velY,-Airidi'sturbed:in parts:;of the' site"away from` the".parking`• ;•:�lo.t°k,and:,building.": :,Some' 'oleinde`rs`have'been`-planted---along'.the "entzance �road and around the 'building, and in the vicinity,`of .the building itself several introduced. species such as bur chervil, horseweed,, sow thistle; periwinkle, iris, mullein, prickly ...lettuce,' arbor vitae, juniper, •Chinese pistachio, big heronbill,. climbing•fig, •mugo pine. English ivy, peach, euonymus, snapdragon and,'others, have either become naturalized or are maintaining themselves. B. ,- Methods ?';*The :field survey was conducted entirely on foot. Transects approximately 30. feet apart were hiked systematically, all microhabitats encountered were individually checked, and notes :were".taken.,on the flora present, size of populations, etc. The ,loaations'•of sensitive .species were marked on the map that accompanies the report. ` , C. Habitats.AM Sflec e's `Present Valley Grassland Valley grassland hebitats are characterized by the predominance of annual grasses and other herbaceous species whose seeds•:germinate during the winter rainy period, and whose life cycles. are completed by late spring or early summer. A few sl•ower, growing and often bulbous perennials may flower during the ,summer and'.early,'fall.. Native•Valley grassland species present ; , Burton's Xesa plan! survey 3 t +4��}jlL�.���1.Y y{' 4�i F': T s i i�1 7 r�♦ t � � t': ' i .. t t.ry �; '�^r :moi >4;ati,`thia';particular sitet'.include :aprinq,vetch,' California vetch` ?'J . + rt;'.Haasens.,:spikemosa„ many-flowered•brodiaa.� grass;nuts,,,: Nhite :,. � brodiaea;'”blue;dicks;' blue';:etare ' bluegrss; slender,:{,cottonweed',t,; "- f valley, .tassels;; filago, ,-- ohnny;,tuck; :valley,goldfields�, ' xodetia'; Hooker'a''plantain;"=;tomcat.clover; annual fescue•;;,: r_:' ,r.fringepod,- rock'eedella,-bird's eye"'gilia,7;bild onion;; Califi. ornia 1�t` ;;s'oaproot,`; fiddleneck;;whitlow grass','<biscuit',.loot';•'-:foothill s{-,`"'.•i '`r;.:collinsia;'_peppergra'ss; saxifrage, tansy`navdrretia; 'pigmp'ieed;., , 'icryptantha,;,lessingia, smallhead;clover, bird's foot trefoil; baby's°.breath,.;"lowland-•shooting '•stnra,;:bicolored;.linanthua =r' . :. begger gilia, Gambel'a milk'.'vetch;��;wild buckwheat;••.tidy''tipa', - ,;cowbag clover, hariy linanthus blow wives;' blue larkspur; clarkia, putty 'root,•'purple sanicle, California sandwort,,, . rabbit's foot clover, popcorn flowers, valley sky-lupine.% bicolored lupine, Fitch's spikeweed, yellow mariposa lily, and , 'others. Introduced speciea -,that.have:become established within`the`.~ fiat ive'.Val ley Grassland flora at:<this site.•include•,old�`man .spring,..`smooth•.cat's_;ear, red,.brome;; wild,,oata; zcomm on-_chickgeed,,_ . star..thistle',::~bur.,`clover;'-Yed=stemm`ed,••filaree :big:aieronbill`;;> ` :rose';clover;•;,;grass: pink;: ;rfoxtailr.grass';�.tumble::.mustard; `sherar ;, dii milk%thistle,::'.thistle,', ;dock;':-smooth chess;',,ripgut:ItaliaA.,,.;.;r•': Wal— \ !. 'a Y a' K ',�; •,. � � .� - � � \. �t4�. r%ihs s z a 4 BUrtOn'.T Xllat plant'Surrey rt i 7 ti�5..4yl•� ', 5�,�„ t.'' 1 i3 {., ; .'s a .• { , ., v:ti,�,STv�Yt 'r'.IK.,.: .:t a+tiy v•�.- 5p,a,a i(•Ay r�`*'.`�.t7Pt. 1'' n.Q ih „ �j_�.S�y :"'.'t , ,4 �� ,•.r„5 t �,��`• +k`?.;.: _this;\particul ar;location; the.•aensItivs plants"adapted to4,,,}Nt¢ t xthe 'specific.•habitata,.involved .and•.most�•'likely: to,be•present. �s4.; include,;;Bidwell'si:knotweed;'Oolygonum bidwelliee) ;, depauperate :milk •vetch^ (AstraOalus;pauperc6lus) ; Butte County �checkerbloom 7 (Sida2cea>:robusta) ,:tButte,County fritillary'•:,(Frtts`lIarfe +' ' eastwoodiae)•..%hand•possibly -Shippee'meadow foam* (Limnanthes,...' ? .. „ ,t:;•.` tloccosa'as y`` p.::californica) ' The,,,systematic search-for, these .and:` other 11ated,piaxa .failed to.produce• evidence•of the presence of all but' one of.,-the. taxa at this, time. '..The- exception ia, the Buttet.• §';.•. .`;County. fritillary, which is scattered along the face 'of•'the .amall;�`x,,; ibluff (see accompanying map) . Butte.County checkerbloom, which .: 1.:previ•ously had been.reported from the edge,of the large bluff just north*.,of:.:the property line;;was: not observed an',the`.date' ofc•`; the, survey. ..t.. E. Mitigations The Butte County fritillary, about whose sensitivity there is considerable controversy, usually is capable of surviving if the area in its immediate,vicinity is not disturbed. Since, construction is not normally;.permitted on' slopes,•:the'10,,.foot setback zone needed to .preserve it would.bei.provided .nat"urally-,'if,",•;•. .;ihe .small',btuff.and' associated,.vegetation'`were•:left.*Ihtact;`and.>:r,`r•,=`'• it .ia recommended..that -this,be stipulated development plans The Butte:County checkertiloom is truly rare;and 'endangered; ., and merits consideration, even though it was not actually - • I observed on the.•property on.•the survey date. Since 'the elevation . at the edge of the large bluff and *PA other factors,- including. close proximity to a known population, are conducive to the survival of.this species, it is recomrended that natural vegetation within 15 feet of the edge of the large bluff be left undisturbed to enhance the chances of this checkerbloom's. avoiding'extinction. s CHECKLIST OF VASCULARL�ANTS THAT WERE IDENTIFIABLE ON THE DATE OF THE SURVEY SCIENTIFIC COMMON Achyrachaena:'mollis Blow'wives Aesculus. californica '.California buckeye Aira caryophyllea ` Hairgrass Allium amplectens Wild onion t Althaes rosea ', Hollyhocks Amsinckia intermedia Fiddleneck Anthriscus scandicina Bur chervil Antirrhinum majus ' Snapdragon Arctostaphylos manzanita Parry manzanita .Arenaris californica California sandwort Aristolochia californica Pipevine Astragalus gambelianus Gambol's milk vetch • �^ Durtoa'a.Xesa>plant yaervey<, L�i�a`5 � �'�5 > ' �./'� � � � �E ` � M��. }��"�z�is{ Y yaM.�fSY `„tlh i^?<i�•'i,,�}•M�j�ir�,t'G�g °.Y`{ £ �"'� 'St u 1 c`,!}"S r £c�' f'i.s 4X� �-: �CISNTIFICMMS '� ;r�in'ts , 1 M 11M f fiLC3li j; h t yo k ?Y7, i+„_ rn"1-n.Cs��Jr'.i�•:P �,f �., q _� es �7 .J'k •S: .5= ,A ven O'•.$p .s` t• ..,t+ W 'ld"Oat$•%•' {r ` t��Daccharis'viminea {.;Mule fat <t�k Drodlaea minor' t::Blue 'atars ?Dromus•diandrua; Bromus:`mollis: �Smooth'"chesa :R'Dromus.'rubens :• Red brome ;c'Calochortus. luteus , Yellow mariposa `.';.. %Ceanothus cuneatus Buckbrush r '•"Gentaurea"'solstitialls Star thistle y.Core a occidentalis Western redbud Chloropalum pomertdianum California soaproot :Cirsium $p. Thistle Citrus sp. Citrus Clarkia arcuata Clarkin ...Clarkia purpurea Purple codetio "• .Collinsia sparsiflora var: brucae Foothill collinsia Conyza candensis Horseweed Cryptantha flaccida Cryptantha, ?Cynodon dactylon ' Bermuda'.grass „ Delphinium•variecbtum ',;. Blue larkspur;. --,z.Dichelostemma 'multiflorum Many-f lowered:.brodiaen Di cheIostemma,';'pulchellum , Blue'.dicks'.::-ti• .:'. ¢ �'Dichelostemma volubil3a'" ;,.::Twining,brodiaea ;. .: :.Dodecatheon c.levelandii patulum.; Lowland shooting stars Drabe verna -Whitlow crass Dudleya cymosa Dudleya :•Eriogonum..nudum Wild buckwheat *Erodium 'botrys Big.heronbill .,,8rodium elcutarium Red-stemmed filar.'+ ".Evonymus sp. Euonymus . Ficus•op.: Climbing fig Filapo 'ap: ; Filago ?`t Fri til Iaria eastwoodiae Butte 'County” fritillary• Callum,nuttallii Nuttall's bedstraw Ceranium''molle' :' Wild',ceranium ° , Gill& 'tricolor Bird's eye cilia 8ederi helix ;,,. English ivy . Xemizonia fitchii Pitch's spikeweed : �Hordeum fubatum' Foxtail grass ::;Xypochoeris glabra Smooth cat's ear Iris versicolor Cultivated iris Juniperus $p. Juniper Lactuca sativa Prickly lettuce Lasthenia 'caIifornica ..Valley goldfields Layia fremontil Tidy.tips Lepidium•nitidum• Peppergrass Lessingia $p. Lessingia Linanthus bicolor Bicolored linanthus ~'�F�•>'i'Ar('j�.64:r�..a; .(� :'r,.;.i s:`. ati"•. ':';��',�;,�. Burton a'Xeaa.Dlaat survey�F�Y ,.r r,.r.+; �� i >. i 1 tr r�` n cs'•: .1:�pV•�.,. . r„ L.{f:�1..1 P•• �y �S/,�w^�,� �..qt 1 }!t t� �� � 1�a.• � t. S !���) �k J S'><y � .ice _ . •f�}�id<':Ry,�k• 7;�ntr5>.W\i, 'r.'�„Fk�t:](d'�Py. kr�z.x"!�.cJ xt ��'' h }r..•,� 't`e „t �Yi Ya 1��5,'9= y - . > .�•'rf �LS�lti�' < r A1+ ^.a`•.rq .Y`Ll. ii,f7Yli� Yh r t t F k�k a1-r l _ �.a e} tjy+•�� '.. ; .M - t,'�°= �.x';.:i'>•'«" }`'�iy-'tt.tilS�VzrA�,r7J��ntf +` ta;>t..^ .� rµ r,.r`r,k ry x J. u''�F'��5,"•' .�,:Kn;`-3'&•�i"..�r.Fx�;i�`� •� •S r Y x„i 'i' rf, w.. i we. ):a_ .p v, t_ ♦ ?>, - �. �, 'Linanthus'•ciltatusF 'i;,y c Hairp linarithua; j. p Linanthus hfilipesvr zr ` Wild.baby's breath =rLolium muItIflorum s ,' a "•Italian,•rye �`Lomatitirusp:.' 't. Biscuitiroot '. i'•:;` ;,`Lotus humistretus 'Bird's foot ,trefoil ','Lupinus, bicolor Bicolored lupine- :A., _". •;Lupinus`vallicola .:,Valley sky.lupine . ` "Marsh fabaceus .. Valley manroot -Matricaria matricarioides Pineapple, weed g..Medicayo 1:lspida ; "+. Bur'-clover ;3 ;:°• ` rMicropus'californIcus ` :,'.'Slender cottonMeea Microsteris gracilis .• '. Beggar Cilia ..•,x,,.,.,,.:- Mimulus guttatus Common monkey flower Montia perfoliata Miner's lettuce Navarretia tagetina Tansy navarretin Nerium oleander Oleander ;ft ;;;` Orthocarpus attenuatus Valley tassels Orthocarpus erianthus Bidwell s:. ohne tuck. .,. Parvisedum pumilum Rock sedelln •`'`+`' Petrorhagia velutina. Grass pink Pinus ap.,:`t J r Pine :,Pinus muco MuQo; pine'. L nua.!sabirriana ?'y ,�;Digger'.:pine ;Pistachio sinensis' ;Chinese.pistachio Pityrogrumma. triangularis Goldback: fern -Plantago hookerians '.Hooker's-plantain 'Plectritis,sp. Putty .root +.• Poa (2 app.) -Bluegrass r. Populus•fremontii -Cottonwood ;Prunus persica Peach: : Quercus dougleaii Blue oak • . Quercus:Wislizenii Interior live oak Ranunculus' arvensis Spring buttercup ,Rhamnus,ca thartica Cof f eeberry Rhamnus:croceus Buckthorn ;: "•';;., Rubus ursinus aff. , Blackberry ' „Rumex.crispus. Curly dock w+: :'Sanicula.bipinnats Snakeioot :Sanicula.bipinnatifida Purple sanicle Saxifraga op. Saxifrage Selaginella hanseni Hansen's spikemoss Senecio vulgaris Old man of spring Sherardia arvensis Sherardia Silybum marianum Milk' thistle Sisymbrium officinale Tumble mustard Sonchus arvensis Sow thistle Spergularia sp. Sand spurrey Stellaria media Common chickweed Symphoricarpos rivularis Snowberry i � P} r i ,w .><i;-� +,.• tit, .: j - � ?� a; •a4�'�'..•r n U 1x�4��'� � � 4t sn r t q,. f }a i -.0* �F . �, , h '' 2<< t y �3 rX lb�� �" �r "� r�'' }�Ct� >1 t r i Ir q.•� t , 1}j t Xe� D1AA��°!Ur`ej► ,� A irLon �^#r �OHMO'Na •� Sia 7 w F f ! nyf, a 'rt ° �"a r ?' S� t.k� . I t.'nk �����1 a +, '` 1 i• ;. �,a� '� ��e a F� {�j,x �a ,,,,V�rYr'�}r,.�•1ti�a�"��� f'7' y��„ uaad'�i3` ' ak � auaV°hia i r . >> � je �ccidenta2 atf: Thua t +, �d 1►rbor; viae; r x' ThpsanocarpusI. .z,:, ipea � � + :Fringepod � �k ,`k• `,• x ' o t,Tillaea;:erecta ^r?t�wek�1 B1y; ry r�Pigmy;�Need j f � t, 3 k'Torilis`,heterophpl2aa t,," :4',,--vCommoulhedQe parsley. ��„`';Toxicodendron,'.diversilobum,� f'Poiaoa`-�oak•:;'� �' , wZ .Tri lolium;=amplectens u•F r ;CoNbaq clover F is' , '��;; TriloZium+'hirt�ua •�','s�.K , ; ,rtiRose't%clover, ! .•• •. •• TriloIiuni',ricrocephalum Smallhend clover =.,TrIfo.1I �n%olivaceum + ° .,Rabbit's; toot,.clover loitum..?tridon tatum•. `% j Tomca tIF clover > `• ` TriteIeia hyacinthin& ..k�White?brodiaea t Triteleia:laxa .4. -Grass•:nuts ::Verbasum•-thapaia ' Mullein,a` `t'r.Vicia`:calilornice Californid .vetch !Vlcisysativa, Spring',;vetch••. Vinca ara jor k Perixirikle . Vi tis;:calitorni cs Wild"grape' Vulpia>ap: 'Annuil •fescue ` r `r ,t.•,.. ^%.rAyf NY �, ..) f +. �i -t' .S' i rFJF, !.: 'LxX F`�✓!, rt E.i.t ,i4 'n s rf i, �y. 1 i f ' t '.,' < ,n.if�'t ft" ., _, rr ni,, z. �.\S' '� ..�• fi t � , 'y.far..:;J,. ;Kingsley--R.. Stern, MD., Senior:Botanist;.- Department;-of-Biological Sciences ,;' California.`,State University .,,Chico,-.Ck,;',95929-0515 5381 or'e343-0056 r��occlsN jy�NtbW'ltlttl.l do HolIVxl—X ''•t''t'�}1P.t"' Al ,xt�✓v'!t•5�4O� y �'1 `,pCi t;? Zs'.1,,r y rf3?s�`;1 ', ,:r ��,L-�•• f,���4'f i.it is k�asi'�,y`?4 } 8, �ltl� �� " •.r�'�•���i,.,.:�Y 's� � t� i:.. •� Q,�� �•, '.��, cr..lrC ` ��� ♦ice (7 ar ff •'�i:'Y s �f, iS ~ei -{ �Fa r.fl', a�i• ! P!�" i T = /tel �-1 '!yt 1 i .'i<�%y�({ lr��.l.i1�t�, r s ;1. '< r .4 � � i ..tl � .r sa ,t• � cA07 ") 7 f '�- ��ry , Y 101• ``s� ° , r 5is ; %'�-// r lits � i .i .-�'�/ Ian. :•- •:•./••�;. `; ` `"�'�(�SS n " rcl •^'�+ � �?�+Y�.+`�•r��'�"3s „��yy I f�jiJ � �+r`'� 4�•{�►�',�'x'��^ ��►�kj�, i� •s.;.�• i. +Y�+"FJ 1r �.)y�'}�r♦ -,.1.� "ZGf'�`-h _� 5 .••� ,< ( + M!4�,� ✓�xt'. F?"_ 5+�45 S iii;../r�i�j �, , � a) . . yea• �`/�/ .�i ���"Fc k#►C � ` � // t� s, � E �� n ��'4 A (5 S,fga r L«tt- .r „ �;7•"z�••,rD l�'• (x�'.F$ � .'�• {t ) _ s•� 1� f h.ln • PP,,sem, 3i 7 V� � tt � Ns`.}•t N!'S M •� +} '/.� �- .f � r�r'` '1 �! v�' �'3't�, , r x�L{ Sr 1,s':�c�'� �')•J:�./+��•./ ,a r! k i f�i.� �,t1lti�r � }7�, s F ,y< 5r a s J r� • �•N i' •.. � d:;:' 1 rt IMt - )�••N• •f • }s sKj.. -.tt; } ,l'\Tv �.ta,`�y. � y-r�'��••�i"�t0 .M- f I...(/.NN�IFYa r. I •.x•1 t�,K is �{� 1}'i1,fy '.� � f ,� it �` s,Jc ,5 r /'I. 1i� >r � •iztha,i^,:` `•� 1. +,�•'�Sa`F���"[lni �`.iC �',; �tH l ty'�^t'. •�"v , xGr��t� rPA���1�5 a �3�i�n t�q� }��. i s ,�,�� A. f}A. dt < T � r I )Ss yiMS� 1.1 r 11 rT -''� � M> >t'I +$ •, f �$.. -,fin?i 7 .f{.+r:ir .. r's.i yt 'i Y• rv7, •.' •• � }Ma. �{ 1 e- rj � Y. •. `• <Mt- � Sf tia ii�'•1�,5 h'?P i,n A � !v /. �,?•uwrIrT', •i { S t 111 r^� ,,,•.�,rh �� !t + �• r/ ;► Pyl •ff t .� ):�r�,•, � .xfr h c 47:a^ryr, }rtv�1., • 01� gy .i!7y A.+tt5+t{ •.* ,,r,�� r� ' `� _� a+7+8.ei�'�r� s • �� ;M Sji� 1 + 3i ru+ 3T '.�'.,2 '•': ✓r }}o (.�.{ `fit ,tJ}'i A ff� A+ Y"���� "�. y� r e +r e 7 5 ,tit' y2 `' �•'.r''� '� :4 �t"� i♦ y T.Ty�` 45�•t'�` �^�, v4.R.1s�(5 ti� s� { �o U h i. Kr{�.� ti,pp � �y ��k �f�,� � M'A,! }t art•'t"�„•� ��,r Ms^.•�`} �v 1!1 5 •., y`4jn f ,3k i r1"4 � s ,�,,$g� �. a•..7�,�p� 1 .� 3 5• as.�. "s� 17= ��" .;*`x�yii' Y,t < 5td' 4`rl,.�'?J'�•, �ti,:4 �,1 ' FN,q� �,t ? r`ri , �.fi'> -r '• � t 7� , 4r �4 \j ♦ i NY 7 'i•:•� �� {.f— - .Qr"'$vkty.§'r.�'��;? r�,ktn`a 'y�''r<1: k 3 � ���� �t;'�v'��1 V*S {��I��'rn rti``•��'' �Yr ��• �4)/V r i' P r or f,r il , o,.fyti.s}r�p}^•�`, t�''. ¢.�'ry„+ �1.�••, -..cs'r i� i L p.i r .. ..y +ty .t P' a �y�fs•.. +'kf ��/�� t F° `�""�• uvr<„� r`�e x�t� ,3 ,<< + r.�F 1 L�-N� - OI� .7� ^,'� 1 •,� (� IS•,� i {rY Y r• .p r^fL l .i 1 r '^, {+�I.1)'DI .f 1. � l � r s j'L Z t+,�7�a�ti.iter yy',, .s �" l ♦ s � n�t5� e .ts fns ;' UTT�iCOUNTY$t:pU1NN#INQ.-'COMM 11331ON. , ' �+"�' �wf~� � �.1`>•xti`�r,fi of f¢ , ..;,,STAFF.-.-.FS£ INDING ":h`'1AugUsCA-,rs „k ��j"n r4h�cxd�F{r+la+-!yFit }1t,7h. � sqv .'•. 6� i.r Y°'r,k' Tom` ��fie '�PJ t r^.'"Lt YM r� r � 1� .l l`�, i l y 1 s f -l• w'. s M1 :�Y x` ,\ r � '� 1i Cy4 ¢R` ,�h /►PpLICANT: r + '' �:'>• > {' < Jerald Jarrett` ?� y , , �1 t T"r � � 7 � + a x. � .s ,1 rtti:rj� + t� } 4 t•` OWNER: ` r Same REQUEST '. . . .- : '•;:!li.," •:ff' General `Plan „'Amendment f ram ' .Genera i cu I tura 1-Res ILow Lrj 1� Denslty Residential I �•' lir�..> � i f f, _1. 3��`•'(:. h �_ - y AP,N••'_ 1911-42-r 0-015. 018 >i SIZE: 10.00 acres and 3.32 acres'. i LOCATION: North •' side of Skyway. ,approximately 3 `mIIes: :`east of + Highway 99. Chico. EXISTING ZONINGr } . • ' U. S H y i• 1 , x ' s 'H� r� .. rt ',yiat, 3 � ]� t j,. •.. s ZONING HISTORY: 1 s toned U Sapt.- 17, '-1985�OrdA` 2488 r•''` "y toned S-H�JBn 17. 1'867 Ord 813, SURROUNDING�ZONING.� ` U. 'S-H. 'R-1, FR-S SURROUNDING LAND-USE: Rural' residential to. "east- 'and west, grazing to south,"bluff -to north. SITE HISTORY: Use Permit approved,September 16. 1984 to allow a restaurant- serving alcoholic beverages •on-site. ' * In 1978, building permits filed for 9 remodeling and additlon.,i Permits i were never flnated. On `January 12. 1981 , a Tentative . Parcel Map was approved reconfiguring the two parcels. The map • was never completed. On March 12,•,.1984. the Environmental Health Department wrote a two-and-a-half-page tetter 1 ^+,::i;J�'. .'I_ ytvt'r.,�%l�T,.. ,1. ,' t,�.•':ka•i✓,-��,.;.c$:;. W1 . . j"la is r1,5�! �. is1`'1 +_ f �v 4 yV\',�i� .�;.,` . ..+'+h�i.:.•: tf r•,5y "+`• •^'`tl 'e n 1D�Sa`��f.N'Y r t \.`j f t•'" �•tY '`<'• ^i•r .,+.�7'. 1 11 rS"� + � r Lf,� R re- yr.. e • !'� 4 �SS"" ��l ��"�•7i,t ey�7 11 �l`1}{t it.� r14s t� .1�1, ,1.; 1 r� x. j;}.F111i!/Wirt , lA. r r#sb+c.t'Y '1 t t c+ r .';, ,tit' i� ` .r• ••:�^�•i:, ":�+r:.Y: " ",;';r i ,r rr t yua: ,r.•� gyp'�.ya;K�i : 4J•V�r f'.}:;r,'l,�14ly^t ,yl'.:•�<`'C.11�r4.t;:^••a ` ?'t,i:: ,i�''`•j<.Yui. �.�':' 'VI: ���r�'}? e:'+:::,�t i!tlur:'iro;;}/>,1'i.�1•'n'•s.".�;;�4„i�,'� Wokil d�1.�\rt'���•. eG} i 1 py�r.�.;� '�.5, j'- ` M3}� '{rgt,� iJ� 4 r'�1F3 `� ���� 'Y �, :t+ mrd •4 �'j1r �S U: 44 . til 1 f, Mia A w f.�Y r �' f�i. >' •:^ ••+ ?- �?i 1 + °': _i t rare' tL�.ljat+ !3''':•"n;i., �,A j, S�•.:tr �r Z 3uaJJno 441M swolgoJd lvsodslp 869Mas DJv aJa4l ' I. :sNJoM .oIIgnd ?03A1303U S1N3WW00 'L9E99 0; 19099 U01403S OPOO , ;uowuJanOO 'Og aevd 4uawa13 asn puvl A;unoO a;;n8 ?SNOIIV-lnD3U 318V011ddV Iv13uePlsakl-IvJn;InoIJ6V NOIIVNDIS30 NVId'1VV3N3D'.- 'LZ J840400 uo uolsslWWOO 6UIUUvld 04; Aq poluop sum A;IIIov! ;anbuvq v, Jo} • uol;voltddv ;IwJad asn ;uenbasgns V •8861 *1 AJvnuvl• PeJ.ldxD ;lwJad esn a4; •';InsoJ v sV;•. . •aPOO 04; Aq paj i nbei, s0 ;UDw;JvdaO 6UIUUQId . AlunoQ a4; o; pauJn;aJ Jo pau6ls JDAaU' aJaM-i,s;IwJad asn a4; 'PaAlaaa sum `.•I 1 vw . e4; 46no4;I V •.:j.l IIW palii;Jae Aq 'Leel '•I" 'JequiaoaQ,; ;uvo 1'1 ddv,a4;' O;i;uas :'GUM';i;i ulJod „ asn a:; ? Cuo i.31 Puoo, 4Z ;. 4;I N►<31 vsn,a43 .pano�ddv:;pw08 'Lr"sqo;o0`•r;;up'• 'q;v6;,puv::o�ua;.,.�� ' ' ' �. . Jo; peau 84; puv 'A:tIIIgl;vdwOOUj`` asn puvl, 'aslOu ;o spunoA-.`-*,- a4; uo. polveddv sJO046IeN '41wJed:':' ' asn o4;, PaAOJddv UO l ss 1 ULUOO, Bu l uuv i d 041 r , •;u.•..dnv;seJ 044': ;o 6u 1 uadoaJ. :a4;`,'rMo.+ v . o; =L8s l 'LZ ;snBny uolsslmoo 6uluuv4, Aq •PJVD4 ' uo I;vO I 1 ddv' .41 wJed asn ,L9s1^'.'Z `Ainr,PalvuIj s;IwJad { iuvJnv;saJ ( •;Oy dvW 'UO I s I A I PgnS ' `D;v;S .044, ;o suOIsIAOJd ..D43 4;IN►' ,.salldwoo uo 1 s 1 A I P', Jo •':<DC7•iaOoJd V. pau wJo a aD Ww uo c A n ;s.r;:,•�;•.,. ; P , 3;1 OQ: I 1 IPq i.vf� I�r a4; : UD4N►' PDlli s1. . aouvlldwo0 Lti 'y H +< ✓ ? l ♦ r' jrYr 30sue uoo OU 4;;1 M':',pop.dOOeJ svM t. DOuQ I Id aop qL}r! _'�,It 4'w•h ` ••1.,, �nY yap r'r L`-3'' �I's - j J°i 40 .:.194vol;14jeo, Qz” ,+,'9861 x :"Z srN4 /CJvnU?('._.UQ;: ;uvJnv;sOJ'.�Fit 83vJDdO.;"'R"�:' ;•, �op.do ;u l Pei l nboJr aq p j noM s �;�xus Air L, e ,� �3,+e•T t �a 4o14M Ysapvjecn-��:Ltpuvjp�suol;vlol%ti 0 P 0 0 �A i (v;U2WU0J U0'.�W"r, �u 13,K w 7 Y r �.x ; R t d • - ' ?>> yT.,�� ' 696 t',';;�.:1 4sn6nV' d4VlS a NOI SS 1 VW= ON 1 NNVId AINn00 311n8'+;' ;s, .�}vqt •CF ;Fk '�Aiay, v�,..t $c:.:r; .'1;t'x'�s• �', . _ti.:,..Fy,. .,,;i �1#^,s'�;�' •�Lt• ,. .._ .w4 :S`" �'�/ 'f .So,�tr''I� b o tl�yt .'•� x.'17>b'�x�,j.kKy j tol \ Sr141 �� r t; � � �t� •.,� �� y+�.n Yr, E.. Ie R4 � yrt 1, i c � i �+It -.y a•}i\Il *S �"� � �1 � rY r 2 ,���� �:. ,+ I � Tt� pr.'�'1,{f�z h�.,rxt ��'§ � J i~���•gyy.�y cSr r N ilkjS � .+ JNA jr� J;r�c 1 et ' I Ik��i� l�I(�n x�1{Y��3���S�N�: t�'� ,'k'lx.Jt,��. j2a�CQ6rL�2f,t�Iv '' i '�51�?rl'fJ'�+'"�`��k4'��CSi,IS •, ^i� f t� 4 F ! h � �r n\ ^ yy.„!�Y.{sla:it r YI r` ` .('l:.%:'j i`.'.•!�.,.• j�v �r k �t'.; J' t onl3Oa;;a O;vInwJo; o3 pJv4 cl 31 uvld ;uawdolonaP 014loads v 3no431M •c;uvld oJVJ Jol 4v4lgv4 to cool pug ol;;gJ3 .4a6vulVJp .'1960dslP caumas 'uolsojo 'aim ;oo(oJd c143 Aq paMolll A;IcuOp Pa6vaJoul 944.40 ;Ins9J v„sv Jn000 o3 �CIaNII aim ;v4; c;ovdwl lv3u9WUOJl'Aua PacVOJOuI •Ma1AOJ ;uawdolonap-aJtl v Jo; ;uawdolanaa ;lull pouuvld 31un go, 9 po;;Iwgns cv4 owl3 s143 ;v 3uvallddg a41 'Po4ovaJ eq Plnoo A41 susp `wnwlxvw 84; 3g43'.Alo)lll waas ;ou coop 31 svoJv Ivoluvloq 9nl;lSuaS ' Pug 'UIVJJo; doo3s••.' I 1 os A)jooJ opn i ou.I 4014M 8416 84440• c;u 1 VJ;cu00 I VO I SA4d .a4;':uan16 ,'JanaMOH •a;ls c14; uo ps;on J;suoO•Bulaq .s;lun BuIIIoMP SL ;o:lv3o3°.v .ul 3lnsaJ pinoo,6141:.•' 'oJov csoJ6 Jad s;Iun 6uIlloMP 9 03 do"'col;Isuap: Ivl;uoplsaJ sMolly uol3vu61sop A;ISuaa .Moi 041 •uMo4S • A I3uoJ4.na c1., 1 v I;uop l cay A;I suaa Mol••;o saJov qS--A I O;vwI xoJddv aJa4M AvmAxs'-a43 to OPlc 43Jou,94; 6uoly uol3vulli A3lcuaa Mo-. Ivuo131Ppv ;aa;l;aJ.:;o; dvlry •,.ocn . puvi:.go4v ,00140 043 Puowv pinoM 4ovroJd •cl41 w04;':03 .;xaU coon I o l oJawwoo ;o ad�t; Auv• ;uvM 3ou op' sjog48 ou.043 31244�`6Jvoddv ;I. ••P I I Vn JaBuo l ou'c l 3 l PuQ ;I wJad asn o44',Pa4VP l'I vn JGAGU'.,;uva j1(1dg 941. '-;uvJnv;coJ , a4; ;uaov(PV,' 043 u l _ 6u I n 1 1 ':.J,01 dood WOJ; . uo I:`j soddo,'': o j gvJap 1.uoo cvM'aJayl..;.•3ugJnv;caJ a43;J.uadOo�'o; ,3lwJad.asll v.PonoJddgy;uo1621WW00 t1 Bu l uuv I d to43 8861 u 1 sJva/t <.uanoc l0;vw1 xoJddv;.y Jo;='•.csau 1 cnq uodo.w uoaq ;ou svy ;ug'Jnv;caJ 941 �vaJv;6u i�IJVd>"paned,a6JV I :ov`aYPup:Qu LP I,1 nq';uvJnV;c9J g ;o' c;c 1 suoa iO3 I c-uo asn;ill 6u 1391 xo'-o41 �._.kJ'^s�.rt �:j y .,�' ,'l•. I' .•r\. S ' } y..:{..,N•• �P' ��'.•'Y•J:;'' oojvd 3uvJnv3s*V vc'oW cuO;Jng o4; 'z9 umou)l 1 uowwoo f ,61. AZiedoid o4i•. . •00140 , 40 3SVa, sal lw•£ dlo4vwlxoJddv.,'uolclAIPgnS ...,1.';uacuv>lS 10 3soM A 1 a;v I pawwl•,;:.:c 1 Pus AvmAxS .,.94z' ►o oP I c 4;Jou 04,. Uo po;voo l 81 1 oOJvd 041 ' � I v 1 Zuop 1 rsM Al I suaa Mol o3 .I v 1 3uop I soy ' I vin;I no j i8V woJ; . I oaJvd'• oJOv •i;•E I v uo uo 13vu61 soP,;: osn-;. ill •043 06uV40 0; ;uowpuawy .uold IvJouap v JO; uol3v011ddg uv 91 .6141 cr J • , ?g9J ' .• ;OUOJO1 Wv043 ';O.asn.o;vlJdOJddvr v.•oq-.o;'swaos Ivl;uaPIsaJ IvJnycvMC�S 43` ;O OPI9 43JOU' a 4 NDJU :043:uI as16• ul • g QJ09:ouo un43;cso I';;;o s 1 aoJvd••;o•/C31 1'1 q 13vdwoo 0,43 6uIpJvBoJ'=6uJ90uoat6v4' 00140:• do A310 041.'. :00140.. ;0 310 .•sa1311Jtov;rlPsodslP 9B9Mo6"i Bu 139 1 x9' :.,Ao•' MQU.` v `.Jo4310 03"1,Po4oauuoo aq ;snui`;uawdo 1 onoD �Cuy ;uawpuowy, uvld' IVJouco o; uol;Oafgo,ON. Q 431VQH 4V4UGWUOJIAU3 .411. ;uaw;Jvdoa Oita uo ;Ovdwl 0N. "= J;SaJO-4 +'f+yp���+ il•1 Y ' ` y .13'.\y i�'S i;t S. ��xr[: .� - c /�J � �ff/1 y4� Jc�t'�''{, S!J r �. 3'.Fkt�y>S' • ` s! n. v ��•� y''J ? uy Y >r +. .� 5 r.y��V r�r k...•a uawdol onaP x s cttt I at F 3 O ' a6a00 Vt ° t<( Wa 6116 ,�,rin;n�, + Joh Pa31wl l og�L�, 1I IMS /CVM/C�IS � 4� EL „ .Z 4'i�� 1 i-1j5 \. � 1. 1 �y e tyt '♦ L1 7� .� r.4+{3� �.r..fit ��+�'."4i. S?\��3��'�.`�*`� "t y(�� r~ t� `�� h .ori .. �-r+ Vii,;. "''•. i-' v;+ �S. ' u\'• C�;••��,.[ ::w..1 ay:.a" r "' z 6861 1°^-3cn6nV 'SqN 1 aN I d' zldV1S ' NO 1 SS I V&=•ENS I NNV1d d1Nnoo nins '' t' �4:i4'k,T '�i�' '' r��r•r.+�•r�` fi�7n •��/t <t+� 4ly�,C��t1H i'. y r�y,�'�4� tH�•F }:.,r �.,ti,. ,;i'� ;�aTya t� Ynr � � `�t F Cry" .'7.� ;f� "'N -�'�'I•=(�'Q r,�jR ' y -rr 1 i � i k8 is�i, -n �, v?,. .r: 7 i �,E`n.c�,r�" A. ,� .l,f, i•+� G.n,+� - :i, y+ �uvtf„ �6 l� ..p: t st•: , : r,l: NMI • b 400; GJgnbs OOLB BuI;clxS ay; UsIIowap o3 sasodoJd 3uvo11ddo ayl •4uawu0JIAUG Ivocl; ;uaJJno a4; UGAIB poilvdwl AlsnolJas. aq Avw uol;oa;oid 00110d pug aiij a;vnbopv GpinOJd o3 A;Illgv s.A;uno0 Gyl. . 'Ugld lvsodslp oBvMas oljloods Auv pasodoJd Sou sg4 ;uvoljddu G41 -9 . Pug . £ Swazi o3 pJg69J ' 4;IM algvuol3sanb .81 031s 1141 'r.214111094 A;I unwwod JGy;O pug U61 40040id-, GJI;' . 'SIOOyas.: '9801AJos . 119I0JOWWOO 03 A3111glssaoov. poop •9 •3u2wdolOAGP IV14U2PlsGJ ill wv; GIBuls pug 'spgoJ 188131113n Bul;slxo o; Jgau Jo 3uaagfpd,.';: 'b ..sxuv3 . of;dGs Jo; algv;Ins suol3lpuoo Ivin;vu . Jo algvllvnv sJGMGS •£ •AIddna, Jajvm o;vnbopV 'Z 'sJvaA OZ u1441M ;uawdOIGASP Iv1juap1saJ uvgJn JO;, PGpaeN •;i• • I oGJv .11 Ja;I Jo 88041 ' 1 v I Zuep I GOV.Al 1 sua^ • • .. u614VUBIGOP'0418 84611 ;uowal3 asn puvi UVId IvJauao A;unoo *;;ng a41 ' f..• •s;uowdo l GASP Bu i punOJJns Gy;jOo;''JgI IwlB';' pug ;uo;slsuo� sl 3843 .JeuuvW 'v ul. . dolanap::;..,o; .Ig13u83od Gy;,svy•.IGOJvd x143;,,Iv13uaPlsGii-lvJn;InOIj6V:;o uol;vu6isap uPl.d.,IvaauGo:!;uaJJnO:G43iy31M`-;,'sGJOg;; 8£'.£'Puv; ;sGJog„£,:.`uaaM;oq a IV ZZ:r0,43' ?Pug•^£-aS.`Pauoz 's j uo I s I A 1 pgns--icuapJgo;4z'I uvdSp;sva oy;"Ol c:'.'saJag:I£Q"uo'.6401:'£b du'l sodoJd, s 1, _sjdn I9%Axookl"'c G 1 1 yM'•saJOv sv.y uasug>ls- •.u013gu6.i sop:ug j d I gJauap I g 13uGP I cGa A;I euaaM0-j .v.GAgy"pug"- I-V PGuoz yZoq QjV'_. Z890.844-.'0;- u01 s I A I pgnS i*in 19•XXOoa" P280doA Gy; pug UO I;I A I PgnS uasugxS ...,r•,uo 1;vuB_l Gap UVI'd•.,IVJ2uas•Igliu*PlsoU-Ivjn4inoliBV'•G43' u1431M I Ivj . 3vy3. s2l3lcuop ;v padolanaP,GJg : ;Oa(oJd s143 do ;saM,'puv •;sva ay; 0; :80I zJadoJd'G41 •;JodJ I V oOI 40 G43.Jgau Pe OU svwo4l Jo;:'-4uawpuGwv .uv I d., I vJGuao v Jo;.,pasn ;;uaaq 'A I ono l AGJd, :,8vy•as000Jd 9141::;:'v.�Pa;glnwJo;':;,;Gq•„ o;• , saJnavow:';"uoI3v6131w. 1n;6u1uvaw.',jo;.,MoI 19 LI I Mss 144' *.y31 M't jIJOM,03;i'sG�n61;i A31 cusp. 3Ogxa:`GA 16,'n:pug 'Guo 1:4vgo 1 r:pgoJ,,-pug bu1Pl.Inq .aj jjaodc a;Is:G�l6 ,I lujM':6uluozland .G41 k'duluoznOnd "o-'japun,'pado I anap�.oq•-;snw`A4'jQdoJd:s l 43`:3843 :•.eg'-11 i M. -u013ga l 3 I w;je41 '.pa3daaov-,,pug:r;uvoilddg Gy; :.o3.�pasodoJd uaaq tvy aJnsvaw;:uol3v51i1W Gu0,144'I.M,u0149zgl0*0..aAj;g6aN`;v::,MPuIW "`uIw ;t14i }.;•441M °•;� :'_;uawssassv Jo; ; u l 1 U92 P I A'OJd 'o; iv;uawuoJI AUG. ,UO13vwjo e;g ;oC;;pug:uBso ' uv8w ; a:•yp 6t s�ououaojp .p , I g;uGWU0J I AUG,>?G I'gguo:; o; S. csGooJd ;;:6u l uug Ld r eyi':±r u l ,r,.,'G I Q I cgo► sn �C I 1192 go .paJgdaJd eq `:p 1 noys r,8uo I;gig I Oaa Via:oA I;g6aN ,L pug i'ca 13._ ,3a4; sa;v;e''saul .lno >Vb30`,ay; t' b009 ;OaS 1;'�z uol •�(`Iuo,;;3uawpuowv lop �oi< uv l d '.I v�Suapr v uo.caJnsvaw,,uo l 3?613 1 W=;r.6u.l;uGwa I dwI:'•Jo;z ;ws l ugypGw:oU So oJa43w'JonaMoH ; I11 Pug II silunWuoIs IpgnS�ivasuv>IS`AJO;�DGJgdaJd a 13 ugt u ;papuauwooaJ;; GJpwi.fya l yM'r ;o..I�ugw,u��'sciJnsgaw uo 13v6,1`3 I W I va0uad 1"su l g;uoa"4:paJvdGJd a�Cpn;s^"'I g 1 i to I� eyla�aaJnsgGW uOl;86,1.3`1 W �' :•t k�t"!Y�,v- iy'�M;u..,�tq 6tt'.}) "] , t r � A Z 3 Xy 4 J�1 sr t< �7�` '�>�„t'! r„i, '`>t't,�Q•t {tl°} 1 ;,�r,��"C �t r :�� 4t ya�,•,t�� Fr`"" rt ft,`^y '"�' d 63ri 7' t ^2'a y` , �. .r 2;�,�a a 'J!� !jY�t� r;�h�'"s �a .� � � , •.,i ti�v?'. ' �!;'t r LY> r � +,�' .` :K ,�, �,,•13S` .,-f;y �'� �..•,�`Y Js'rr{.`�'� `.th' "�„T'4�Xn. ;•_ ' • � •X686 l•'�'1 is;n6ny - SJN I ON I�''ddV1S NO 1 SS 1 WWOO DN I NNV1d kiN.noo,311n9 r r r i�Ft�i^V�'� {. •is•r;'4 r�ht rrub i �<I S r <� i �, t 5'''. i. .t - s r'...-:. ' �y-���'Ir,��•7r �+., rt�,h(aF � �4 �i, i� � res* c � �.�4v, e^ , < t Y�}���>•��t` r ,..tafY� r ej >� �tf4, e+,�Aic'sYS`:�25 �R'i�fs�,';�.������t'.r+.�iYT�`.7v��� Z� 4V, ,i '.�,'+ `•� 1 t_c , BUTT C0UN7Y+1p&NNINbCOMAISS`i0Nr 11 1 i bT 44f 7� • t 5�t r . } dty fit "t . STAFF WINDINGS I%tWAupust�1 +.'r�. `t" .+ fm'i-- i�Y•i ivt k""`"t r}i.r K� r•�• � -s� +rf ai Y4 ��r`y'���`F��k���� �.� � Frj�m. a r.� _„ .k'c ; lit �+r ; 5 }v.,•r K�y r�i.. i `_(�}. � < C ., ,�. :'F.5 L •Sl �`l Y t tf N T. [ '. restaUrant4,,. ructure ands.remove�tne..paved,,p>irkt.n�p lots to accommodate: the 'PUDLxd6vaIopmant,� �ThervnIue";�ofkthase�im0rovamants;.,w,l'II`be�yl.ost'' 'c and *fr;W,the$nppt;fcant, -standpotnts?the�,numberkof ,new:•houaing.,units; mush bea� ab l e�to cover�,, h l s Jul oss ands make n .prof t'°� 'I t l s4 not thei ` Counlys'` responsttb'I I ltyh' to 14 npproye`� projects- based� tonYecontmlc g factor3. �0nera;aIter native 3�.that`4M the "dppl Icantkmay,,*Iifi'aoFexplore•; wouldltb'e�yto;,, '??t convert� hen• existing . ..restaurantructure � .tot,`ta ° res l dent l a tw use, posy l b l*a,,a-dup I ex .br tr I-p l ex and then rezone to"a+�I` r acre-mInlmum.zone tof create 13 parcels. 5 r ,t-_ rr ♦ R, a. {rC 7 S Jv. x I' !I RECOPMAENDAT IONS: i 4 - rl � A. ,�Nolenti et the regu 1 rements`:for;}CEQA t hnve been comp I eted >mnr �< considered In•maklnp'.thls decis'toni rand r�� � < ���," �'��}xX . �'��p� `t` 3>L .,'K SatF 1 �'1 r '.•r < ,.t•:�:.,^•• tri .ti.; bi ... ,_i B. 17I nd`that'"the"proposed Genera I..P I an Amendment. does,'not:conform•.,_' 41thS.the:.poI IcIas of the Land';-:;Use EIement':of,';the"•Genera l,`'P.tan+iPA! because, _:and C. Deny ., the app t Iii l on for'` ,.a ' General P l an.-�Amendment s'AgrIcuItura VResIdentlal, to..: Low ->.•Dens ity;• , Res ldent lal.;:;on,:'t -Asse3sors'1Parcels I IJ 42 16 (Jerald Jarrett) r.-rf. d.r�iJ7 �� �' ♦1 1�} �a�:-+. r. ski ",.Zi, i. '7, 5 t f -: ,!{:.' � Mr rc' J a�•f'�r.`rt, f1„{'f�,+;.Rx,Z .', I f theF,?P t ann 1 ng Comm 1 ss Ion ';can make '.the f 1 nd I ngs•.that ,the proposed �t� .; protects;meets the':'pol icl'es of;the But ta"Countyr_Generat.•,P,l ean c',;then:;it would beyapproprtatto make thet'foItowing motlo_s f ,' ,," �t ;. ,,tJ .n_� �ti,1':rt~; 7:1. � f.., 7• !tf 2s\� _ nr�. ;< iq ,,;ti e�,�v t+;!daC F+^, .`, MOT I ON s,*f MAKE..THE -FINDINGS LISTED UNDER' -A4,' -B-,:--AND' "C"i AND"MOVE 3 ; '• i' r' AS I NO I CATED•.UNDER' *DO' AND.-."E"" INCLUDING ONE CONDITIONS -.4 , ;•.,;,i fir;a;;.,. A. Find that: :'L;,,*,,: An i'I n 1 t t a I study was completed In compliance w I 2.',., 'Said study.'.. and• comments received .thereonI,f ` potentlally„�slgnlflcant environmental effects.'.that.`;the '' project may' have',had but: ti^, :+ �;Y; ' a: Revisions In the protect plans or proposals made,by or agreed.,to,by ,the applicant would avoid such,,ef fects ;or,.^ m I t I gate.such effects.-to a point 1�-where':'•.`c I ear.l y;;no;i• significant environmental effects would occur .pand.;> :;�• b. There Is no substentlal evidence before''tha'coun'ty'` that the project as revised may have . a signlflcant.;, effect' on the environment. -•'d'";!••� ;`r^,h"1}'{:?:)�?'i�';�'fid'• _ •;v.. •;,.:_..•: •!,;,. +.;., �Ir�f�1§�.p,•��ir� YJb r'1�S 1�,,„�••, -'"'. Sr 1 r �'�`„fit i,. { '`r^. 1 � } t , r�h����'"�n p'�t1j�+il�'���5�"+�jrwv+!� 1jr tai,., ' 4r os a1<•}4 tr {i ” ,, 'k r N� ¢ � S) -�,� , r?ag � r"f7,+�.y G, SIr�'Y3` rt'�''�Y a YF4�' 'J ` � } t, t t .v S `•,j4r�q' .7J, tt l� v, r !. 'K, '1 t r S`•�ut1 ,t rut F Y r1f AU i5 <,E S R\ 1 v `,d7.^ }p.f; , 4 v Y •,f 1 < h' r ark.� ?F, " �7 ?`f t V,.,'r ' :.S ._ '. i ...• 4 _::. ,,. •t 31 q 1 14x3..U01;Wool V,31gI4x3 �Cpnis I.IIl3Iu1 ���>•!R � � ,� �++i��; <, ��,s��7 a;"y ,artco Iji I� PU!'uoI sc I wwo� 03 rc;uawygQ33V Lt,'1 x'� r��+y� bs�. r\ � t`i.. :f•1"rb ythr�r - -)r Lr i 7 F l� +.ri � r r��,+s: '�A'�"}''Sb {`?'i!,1t °ai7J,�y,J t;•!r, .4c{'S .t, "yr- rr v}ti�75t'_da4�Sef, 'r•� .1 ,7� 7h {;�rta �IL'��s•t� .:.yi �I=s8.7 i� aCr• ,. P4'� - �A�tr!! �:.��f •t8 1t lit,.�j� c�1Mh 1Jr`•r• t� w ,}.'•fit;t, ti{ - ��y t'�i� Yh du xz r 4}y r c�uo►3Qu6I aap �d .VK64 aq 4anw auozoJ =.ivanbasgnt �Cuy ..:,d;;ryy.. � v, y b' - rt<,� i/ �•;P �IrY'�.�1� a 4 .� b..•')r," .` \ _ \ <,,;~ I • e.+:.i%A fSt�� FI�Ia"�'�a^,i6.�f•tF.• aS<u� f��Ll_ ESQ c t } + }'•�l tr • �„ it. .h! v .. �.. uol3o0 (sync"{� '' litwfisBu1Mo110;zf i' .V. %` iiglUx3 :Pa4ol33! uo�vMoyc c!' �t33aJJl� pI ) .91 t6 I.t:}dV �0;..=1?I3�aplcaa l cUGM..';Mol `,moi. 1?1.iva?I sats-.1 lJn.31 nal J0ywoJiv x?=uQ l .,puQ�, layy:,0014� ;.a43 OUOW!"ois;�t.I LWal i.loads,3uawa.I.3i osfl'r:'CuQ�:,uQj`d;.: �SI�¢�aub�..�;uno�`.o33ng 043 of ` ;uawpuawd:`uQ1;:Ou.InoJddQ,:UQ 41)'1Ocaa ;-' 3doPl, cJoclnJadnS ,�o PJQo 'a IPuawwoaa� u 8` V38� r t piinloraa >: 3d0pyr 3 r r � KSI!'f ',.i� N•S'' �F7.5 4`f�1�f 4 �'' �'94`•x{��* u r} s � ilk SDUQ faJ !aw uo QB `�`�' �.��� �`�' � ,:r �•� ,:�,�•�`�+ �,,.��•�kfiar, , � �, � ��celr� � li tiles aua,•4}IM u 1 QJ1: a aw a �t'rt, ti't �e�'�' ��. r`t+t r;�r�'x'�w '4 ,, yh Q .ic a /�'G�•�,'�,I;QOaIJ�II,�,3doPV'k'�" Q <Y R+fT' yy�it "'1 x � 1({�� rS,,;i•fi'�,Zyy'�i{ � q dk pY •ScuiiZ.gib•( !4 .,7.f "' .Pr.*C t '+r, FN�1 J.! r��+ay i 1r 1 Y3uatUa ,t I3t ft.^:PuQ uQ r � �. Y � IdrllJauaD .h�C3uno�C�+�a33n9 aLIjcala1Iocl h r t#A rt.b;�;*r;C 4 3 t? utt/� u!I d,1 lJaua�'•r pbrodoJct a Q , �Cr sYS' y'•_}'` i�y,.��S t roT ,�,��; <.i'�'�:;ric•,v;iv1'ri w sr ti' r .1 �.tt r 'i a 14 t t''t���y�i a� xi�•������-'�y�rj� ��'P x y�?�'�k•Pk�� ,°'".k.'SYz�Y�3�F+`+,�'f���1�r�rct`'r���'���15c�� '"r' y M�"�'~v ' {• <�•�rl,.. j'Puc, peµa j na:i�uaaq"onQ csaPo�q�Ma I na z a cug"F lgngg43r Bu:Iunp pan apaJ i uaw�wa 4 I MJpc ,r r h 1, 43PBo3 uo 13II�v dap ,man 13QBaN P.I Qc 3!43 Pu'I 9 30, 44 j" Paiq aFua q� v1�`� ^µi •��',, �; oet� � .4ri�•.:r 40�;} e�FQ,I•, D%1;�� '�. N; ;Q>�Od01�,• ''Yr Y>•5'-��E'�''�c r, /�'7�" .i�2� ' ,}�. �' ,� _ t 1 SSS' 5��"." SV 'C�Cy.�• v . ym.�i y ,r y s rk68611:1.�::P:isn,6nlfiwSON I aN 1`3 d�Vls x b.' No s :4 rpNl ,', 3�3 '. '•,�,'�+' � i •• ya� �M:4y�r :d-=:Jl1Nf10J.311f19 Mill v �.!• � R�t'�� �'-�•Y2`'y ''ytroj•��:`r,`sN ttr ��.: R.,��rj �'T;'�'i�., •`4'�'3eC.•�A4�y� nr� `r��i,y�•It'.�;.�4Y�yy.)fr! 4'. �, w,„ .$rt s } l" ++�'�t •,v n' v�.:,, / � ��� ,n r� s ���l,q `isf y �* r't Yrdt�ji`t5��^: C i t'' r t v h s, e > 1�. t..s .y,«;, �t ,1�� �'9 �, E s•'�r a!! � t z � � - i i •' , , Y. ; 5 > ,�� S,.'1 u n G a d 1 � �P) t „k r� >. t�'v ' y .t, Y��:'� �. , 1• �� y1 r•{ _ * y, ' Ck.rt rxrlr�,, yr t4c :,) .. tr .-d:,., ,:r1 .I-�'r:t�t r4 7f .'� ..<.r� •t "'.• r.'t; .'�f rrr•:�5. Appendix '•C" �EARTff�W1t� HAZA�tD s hLAF{ TECs Id7RTEC:ASTr' CO'tr�t OF T2IN RZE s , Bv'rTE COmft •i if r'tdt14±a"•t•-r'p•,t..r�- /t± t Ji 1 t4-,r yk \u a Q Z t s t a) `fir Wp- �i 7 C�aktt`�ls- yT�a i •°y }��" ° r "t y�� J� l a y e r#iy'��� y .�t °Z.w - n r , cn r ,.tk t pill: n,'Jt +•k�, ,W Calif. Rejistered Geologist no. '�{±� .•h�' . h.` ii, kyr r ✓ 5�l A ci t .Vtr tr p i�sv'}t ri F� Jf`�� xi b t��. < { rt t 5 ±!!..?oar i, ht t 6 SY a fi.ji,r •1�t3� {i'`! J f. ',�'f - > , tr y tir' t �+nk ±`� ( y ;{1�*` of . rr+Y' i4•'{1 •G• f -{�'/tL. di±f./r, U,� .3 , < ±s ; ! ?J Ht.�r �'�,. - �xJ �. ti •�'', ��..9d t+ ; y'i, r4 qt'i.4 j '` ,?;'C } 9 S 5 ey- : ~!5 T '• i:b , }" ry yM1 ck a. ✓' •/a < N � a#-X4 h 1 ±. 1 .91, a.a G+a'�� �ti' P v ,t'1 tri r�:�e u<.a , � �j r..,.r Y.,, x �+•. ?��'± ..}v+.:M-1 £- {tJ Y 44f Jl residential development s pla:iited;north oi-The',Sky►rs�, .riear.:The y ia + :;rkesa� In Sec„ 3, .T21tt; R?E"k-OA,the''+envi bmental',crecklist to`•:this".}noperty Stephen,Streeter:.lBixtte;CountyEiicironmental:iReviesv Dept.;;; 'Jrat t, " 1�Jarch;b;'1979,;mote,:"An active. fault;;=in the foothill4aultvz6ne.xlies xy'�one ai]e;eest of,theeasternaparcel'boundary:..It<is;reccamnended`,that, R� geolodst,W:M=e Ahe site=to deterkne the possible,,hazard posed -rearthguace.Sault%-;:A x}}as retained by Johni�lirt to mPkebthie determitiatito�n:� ,�� � } ^ .� -ii...1,",y �J� sY-t Jlr` r r,. 4•• Y.._f�,r •K !±.roar .��3>><..w�' ` r`•It' �. 7� ',� 7'lr�'�.,N '1•`1'yKy,� !. Me method of.iris►esti'gation waw to''eXaniiae:atandard-e7`evatiori blaclt-and=`T+w ' ;;rwtiite aerial,,photographs;;,f(Slown'in.1975) for,.evidence'of.fra6tetres„^„1'ocations.k.:.' , of several free es'were otted'on"a -P1 1 21+ 000;toPcgi`aPhi o' %photographe'r(ticnm ii'1972 at50-60,000 feet`elevation):xerealso`'`exarained:='>`'''>"r` A field check of the,fracturea'xas made`on`'A i Aril 6,'to:determine whether they.' ;are faults and whether there is arty,evidence of recent movement:'•rr " ± e••' Y;:v' J^'Via'' S' t. Y :; ' ,.' J'4 The iiiip accomparCri iig Chia report is a;copy of.part o'f the:USGS Heailia ? ` ;Canyon quadrangle;'..;ton'it ,are,'utotted:the fractures ween on the-air;photh6 i as wen,33•the two`nearest,raults shown on Zfap II l of the General Plan f ` (Co.n}.,'or Butte 1977? Y • ,4,i.. `,i�;1'The region in vhich.•ths aite.proposed”for.developnem ues'lis underlain",:.. by.volcaaic sediments and mudfloif.debris.Of the Tuscan Formation.. 'Compact; relatively-impermeable mudflow layers xithiri'.the formation form.sasli'cliffs•: ;r that:stand°oat-in.relief•in canyon walls:. -Where such layers are crossed by .'faults along which there';has�been'significant movement, it.is,commonly•...' possible,to sea the:offset layers. `' In contrast, ,faults:.on'ridge,tops, or.'.,, valley,;bottoms:tend'to'be,eovered,bp soil.or;alluvial”debris. t rs.< :4?fi Houk;layers`of the'Tuscan Formation'are also cut"by•" oiMs" a`type.0. fracture'alon vhiich"t2iere is significant movement g gnif pasallel�:to-the:fracture•• plane.`":(This definition contrasts with fault, a type of•fraeture'along othieh•,- there Li.significant:novetaent,parallel'to,the fracture plane.),,:;'Faults form-... in.conjunction with earthquakes, -wbereas'•joints,form in other ways'such as from' shrinage,by-cooling or dehydration.• If a rock mass is broken,, but it iR not possible to ten whether a given break is a point or fault; then the more general'.term "fracture" is used. The Tuscan Formation is about 31 mi11_4ofi years old; thus any faults that cut Tuscan rocks must be younger than that age. ; Lydon. April 8, 1979 page 2 s { FAULTS I.Q4V.. .I: _ _ .'''r ,, tib . ` •Y r�`��.d{";�,: as r>�* .Ths oxo nearest �aults'shown-an*clap.;IT 1.of the`General Plan.are 1 iffi {? ;south'and:l•mi least• cf,the`developmctst site*:..Despite_'Stephem Stieeter's". �'� cf•i, 4,cd=ent.to she:contrary these are not'active:.faults:,rTThey are:shown on Map SII-1`;as "activity unknown"..:Flu�ther;•.no;evidence of even their eudstMee was', aeen in'`either the black-and- +lite or'infra-red air.photos,-,or,during the 4. growd--check.. Filially, .thesa'two•,faults are not shown in published literature' on;the region`(Burnett 1963,'Je=ings,1975 and Realat al. 1978). h ; A recent cempilation'of earthquake epicenters (Real et a1.;1978) a2iowa •that the nearest recorded earthquakes to the site are an'earthquake of intensity ss'6 located near,south Paradise, and two of magnitude 4.0-4.9 located northeast .., ;<;••of Chico .'`No epicenters are knmm fobe located on or near either of•the:tvr,, 4ifaulta from.1,* II-1, and .-ale is,,locatedr 'cn or near anq other•fracture,;: '•x'=,:{ discovered during.this' inv:.-Ligation. ' 1r1hi]a t2ie'two faults•of..lisp II i could not be found in air'photoa or an the'ground, a number. of fracture'traees (some of Which are faults) not'shown on Zap•II 1 sere• discovered.' Similar•fracture traces have--been described by•'` . Burnett (1963), Who concluded that they are swarms of micro-fractures 'and faults formed.When regional folding deformed the Tuscan Formation, about . • , : 2..v94 114 veas.age . Saris evidence of slight'offset was observed'along aome..of the, racea, proving,that they are faults, but'no*evidence;of offset.of a%rock or.'aoil. :-,.unit younger than the Tuscan Formation 1,►as seen.:..Jennings (1975) classifies -' similar'fracture traces north of Chico as pre-Quaternary (older.than•2 million -years) in age; it is likely that the faults and fractures near The,Skyway Were formed at the same time. The only evidence of possible nearby fault activity in recent time is the location of an epicenter (magnitude 4.0-4.9) on one or Burnett's fracture .traces northeast of Chico; this sugrests but does not prove that at least :. one fracture trace might reflect on-going fault activity. The epicenter and fault-are shcnm on ndp n-1 of the General Plan, and by Real at al. (1978). EARTMWAKE HAZARD 'The ttro 'nearest fracture traces to the site are'both about 1.3 mi long, and 'are both about 1 mi from the site center. If we assume.that these are• ' traces of active faults, tre can estimate the ma-b= earthquake effects by following the procedure of Greensfclder (1974) and Krinitzslcr and Chang (1975)0 as described in the County General Plan, Section II. The maximise credible earthquake Will have a magnitude of'5.1, and an estimated Modified Mercalli - intensity of VM (implies damage to structures not.designed to resist laberal forces; some damage to structures not designed in detail to resist lateral'forcest• and no damage to reinforced structures designed to resist lateral forces). No evidence of faults or fracture traces Was found on the site, either in air photos or on the ground. Soil on the site is absent or.very shallow; this trill tend to minimize any ground-shaking effects from an earthquake. nage 3 COhiCLUSION cant earthquake activity near the, 'site.is t 1 e'possibility:olisigrsilY e':inability of'eii.rphoto cxsainition f ands `+ 3udged,to be�remote,�.based-onith ' 9.1it F "r R . ground check-•to.'•daLect tha,two fain ti and the •lack oT,an9 far : mostd fracture•traces, .• lack of visible offsets along nt IIOv event alongthes,tracee• + . � r 6��T�i�C��m,,! f apidenCO OgeOlOgically reCC �4JV ! - �J l 1Rfi - -r X46 .GY ! "1.1• , e:. Wl Fyi A.-�'{ . 'traces. near;;thei sito:.are,,oi:'strilc tz !' •,€ , V '`beeause Lhe tYacture, s Shear Zone as-ahcwh'oa Map- HoweverZI-sy ",�{� ri �,�ry� i• ' .(irec4�ong;;5th° trend.of):the;Foothills, ;aith:`a n'acture;trace''near.Chieo�Y and;•becauae•:of•the`coineidinS.'of-aa'ePi aiiould,,bo:.tsken::into the;'possibility.of,earthquake:activity, how°ver..remote,, ax�ise;;frcm► ' aCCdBnt�tii. The:est3aated'maxLmtm..credible earthquake:tt►at• could:. _ aeazb9` '°-traces`fallted'ii% Ge s;within the Bch'declarantjCje, The anticipaet d' �', Catmty-of'Butte;:1977,-_p..,11-17), n.(, int'ensity•across"all,-df;,Butte.County.;ie•xvlll;on;the aki from VII se ground:ah n8`' however, •the:intensity ��d vary:loca,ly�F a ;+ ,` `^v rs� Nodified IIarcalli :Cale :n. ti_ �. _ to �Y R• s,' ` Z e p .'. - b ;~tactors traces in the Tuscan-Formation, north O 39 3s Spec. Rept: 82, p. 33': California= Cal.%Div. Bines & Geology, jy 'i,•i Plan . SBC.}II,,SeiSaiC j t ar I��G Y� " °, r Final BritteA Comity an , Canty of:.Butte,s 1977, 2 us`appendix and maps. safety element: published; 3 P• Pl i_ + R.,;:,`1974, Lisx�°ua credible'-rock acceleration from earthouakes` jrr Greenafslder, Sheat no. 23•.''' IIinea & Geology I•.ap in Californias Cal. Div. R •' '1975: Fault map' of California:" .Cal. Div. Bines L Gcolo® Jermi.ngs, C.t�.., . scale 1:750,000. ' Geologic-Data.i•:ap no. '1, "F.K.; 1975,:Earthquake intensity and the _ q j !�,rinitzsky, 8.I»,':and Chang, US Army Corps of` °aelaction•,of ground motions..for. seismic'dv i6n�. I�.iss., 23iscellaneeus,..,'.° i•. ... :i;Engineers,`->Taterxays �ent'Station, icksbnrg, '. •Paper:S—?3—1,14 P. Plus appendices :yadaT.R:, aad.Parks, D.L.- 1978, Earthquake epicenter Real. C R:," TOPPO a 100 through 1974: Cal• Div. Trines Geology.I+aP rap:of Califor� , 9 Sheet'39,'• scale'1:1,000,OUO.: Philip A..Lydon.. st no. ]1J• California.Registered Geologist April 8,,1979 rj�QYJ.Po- / ���� planning Department 0 ] t993 mwne,c.ir<rma �� 9 Ca 9S9o`4� 7-/L2P ta- Cl/ '�-S X61 -�-��� �C �� - J { Z�� � ' V� A . v ����� / /� D v L����� y C � � , � J OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT Administrative Office OPERATIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES 1163 EAST SEVENTH STREET CHICO, CA 95928-5999 (916) 891-3140 (916) 891-3000 July 1, 1993 Planning Department s U L 0 31993 Mr. Stuart Edell, Manager oroville,California Butte County Department of Development Services Land Development Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Chico Unified School District Response to "Jarrett - Rezone to PUD" Dear Mr. Edell: District representatives have reviewed the information contained in your memorandum dated June 25,1993 regarding the Jarrett Rezone to PUD located on the north side of Skyway at the Northeast corner of Skyway and Canyon Rim Place, Chico. District representatives have determined that the proposed project will negatively impact Chico Unified School District and, therefore, warrants further environmental analysis. The District recognizes that Senate Bill 1287 (SB 1287) may adversely impact the County's authority to impose the following requested mitigation measures by rescinding court precedents established via the Mira, Hart and Murrieta cases; but that issue is yet to be resolved. In addition, any restrictions which may be imposed by SB 1287 may be eliminated if Assembly Constitutional Amendment 6 (ACA 6) fails to win the support of the majority of California voters. Based on this information, the District requests that the following comments be included in the project approval record and requested mitigations imposed to the extent allowed by law. SCHOOL FACILITIES FOR NEW STUDENTS GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Settine The'Jarrett rezone to PUD proposes thirteen lots which will allow thirteen additional residences. Applying the District's .43 student yield factor, this development will generate approximately six school age children. Utilizing current District actual student enrollment data and projected student enrollment data from already approved new residential development, each elementary, junior high and senior 1 .. .+ .. 1. Mr. Stuart Edell, Manager July 1, 1993 Page 2 high school in the District is filled to capacity. To accommodate a 50+ percent increase in student enrollment in recent years, the District(1)reutilized existing school facilities, (2)utilized interim elementary school facilities, (3) placed relocatable classrooms on existing elementary school campuses, (4) instituted multi-track year-round education in three existing elementary schools, (5) occupied one new urban elementary school on a year-round schedule, (6) occupied one new elementary school on a traditional school schedule, (7) is in the process of constructing a third elementary school, (8) has placed interim facilities on the secondary campuses pending the availability of new school facilities, (9) acquired a site and has planned to build a new junior high/middle school and (10) has planned to expand one existing senior high school. The District continues to be a participant in the State School Building Program wherein the cost of constructing new school facilities is shared by the State and by the local district in a pro rata fashion. The State-wide need to construct new schools far exceeds available pro rata State funding; therefore, needed new Chico Unified School District school facilities have not been provided in a timely manner. Local Chico Unified School District revenues generated from school impact fees, coupled with the proceeds from the general obligation bonds approved by the voters in April 1988, will meet the student housing needs generated by local birth rates and previously approved residential developments but will not meet the student housing needs generated by new development. The District anticipates housing increasing numbers of students in interim facilities until funding becomes available to construct new schools. Impact of Proposed Development on Chico Unified School District Schools Since District elementary, junior and senior high schools are filled to capacity, it is evident that students generated from the Jarrett rezone to PUD cannot be served by existing facilities. In addition, there is currently no funding mechanism that will enable the District to provide facilities for these students. Based on the District's .43 student yield factor per average (1,280 square feet) household, the three new residential lots in this development will yield approximately two students that must be housed in District schools. The District projects that larger residential units will yield more than .43 students per household and smaller residential units will yield less than .43 students per household. To adjust for the higher student yield factor in larger than average households and the lower student yield factor in smaller than average households, the District utilizes a mitigation cost based on square footage of habitable space in each household. This project must be consistent with the Butte County General Plan and the impact on the District must be recognized and addressed in the project approval process. Mitigation of Impact on Chico Unified School District Schools The District is opposed to County approval of the proposed Jarrett tentative parcel map application unless the project fully mitigates its impact on the District. Mr. Stuart Edell, Manager July 1, 1993 Page 3 Acceptable mitigation measures include: • cash or in lieu equivalent (land or school facilities), approved by the District, which is equal to the full mitigation cost as described below; • imposition of a controlled phasing of single or multi-family residential development to coincide with provision of adequate school facilities; or • denial of the project. The 1991/92 per habitable space square foot cost to fully mitigate the impact of each residential unit is $5.29 per square foot. This amount will be adjusted as needed to reflect the impact of inflation, school facilities needs, regulatory changes and other cost influencing factors. The full mitigation cost of $5.29 per square foot of new residential development will include school impact fees (currently $2.65 per square foot). The school impact fee will be supplemented with an appropriate amount of cash or in lieu equivalent (land or school facilities) approved by the District. The combination of school impact fees and cash or in lieu equivalent must fully mitigate the impact of the development on District schools. Since the school mitigation cost established by the District is based on habitable square footage of the residential unit and District representatives are not informed of the habitable space of each residential unit in the proposed development, it is not possible to confirm the total cost of the mitigation at this time. The following calculation is provided to allow one who is knowledgeable of the habitable space of each residential unit in the proposed development to make her/his own calculations: CALCULATION Total habitable space in residential unit(s) times the current cost for full mitigation in effect when paid ($5.29 per square foot in 1991/92) equals total mitigation. For example: 13 units @ 1,100 square feet/unit x $5.29 = $75,647; or 13 units @ 1,280 square feet/unit x $5.29 = $88,026; or I 13 units @ 1,400 square feet/unit x $5.29 = $96,278. i Mr. Stuart Edell, Manager July 1, 1993 Page 4 If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at 891-3209. Sincerely, 10 10 Michael Weissenborn Facilities Planner Operational Support Services MW/dm cc: Ken Petrucelli, Assistant Superintendent/Operational Support Services COUNTY OF JUL 1993 L d Deveiapment'Sec. i MEMO TO: Planning Director StG JC FROM: _ Stuart Edell, Manager, Land. Development Division, SUBJECT: Jeff Jarrett, PUD/Rezone, AP 11-42-15 and 16 DATE: July 1, 1993 In order to review this proposal for completeness pursuant to Government Code 65940, et seq., we need an application that is in compliance with County Code 24-126. This would require a complete subdivision map application as part of the rezone application. The information we have received to date indicates that this is an incomplete application as there is no subdivision map application. If you should have any questions, please contact this office. Stuart Edell Manager Land Development Division Dept. of Development Services P-OKLO-9 41H, 1-o MSE B, COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS. , d 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 PlanW 9 Oapartmant (916 53r��6Ol JUL 02 1993 (Ftd � n TO• �jc�t e E V _ DACE: JUNE 25, 1993 ftVidia,Oa at®rnia LI li JUN 2 9 1993 RE: PROJECT REVIEW & DEPARTMENT OF FGolIEST RY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION ,�ATE ,! ,�t31�if B?U IEE_ („hilt@ e - JEFFJARRETT Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: RE7.0NE TO Pm) AP#n11-47f1-oyi, n16 13.32 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SKYWAY AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SKYWAY AND CANYON_RIM PLACE, CHICO, ZONED U S-H We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and . _ will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) . Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation; or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise __ that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above-noted date. If. no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, Larry PaLder Planning Technician Comments• knzy-.,� y Pa„ � r3D Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) . ' Yes No y i�urrE=� r Inter-Departie;nta I�Memorandum \cam, TO: Larry Painter, Butte County Plaffhin-g Division' FaoM: Ted Crawford, Butte County Fire Department SUBJEc4UD Rezone AP# 011-42-015 and 016 , Jarrett oar E: June 30, 1993 The following will meet the Butte County Fire Department require- ments for the proposed planned unit development on 13 . 3 acres on Vista La Mesa off the Skyway, east of Chico : 1 . A pressurized water system per County code is required with / a minimum of 500 gallons per minute fire flow. 1 2 . Three fire hydrants (6" ) are required, spaced at a maximum of 800 feet apart . The locations of the hydrants will be coordinated with the fire department . 3 . All dwellings and access must meet the Fire Safe regulations (� of. PRC 4290 . 4. All "green space" , area to be preserved, must be cleared of underbrush to prevent a wildfire from reaching the structures . 5 . A homeowners association or some other means must be generated to guarantee maintenance of the water system and the green space clearance . �4� 6 . Class A roofs on all buildings . 7 . Vista La Mesa Drive will be open to Rim Rock Drive for a second access . 8 . Lots 5 thru 13 : all � g a° overhangs , including decks will be en- closed with non-combustible construction on the canyon sides . If possible, Butte County Fire Department would like to have Canyon Rim Place connected to Alm Bluff Drive with an all weather access( with or without a gate) . If there are any questions please contact Captain Ted Craw- ford at 538-7994 or Battalion Chief Bill Redding at 891-2790 . Ted Crawford Fire Captain cc-B. Redding S. Rroeger DISTRIBUTION LIST FOR COMMENTS RESORUCE MANAGEMENT County Public Works County Environmental Health State Water Resources Dept. County Building Department U.-S. Forest, Service . City of Biggs U.S. Bureau of Land Management City of Chico Butte- County Mining Committee City of Gridley �St_4_te Department of Fish & Game City of Oroville California Native Plant Society_ Town of Paradise State Div. Forestry- attention Planning Department Craig Carter State Transportation Department ,-K-- Regional Water Qual. Control Bd. rOM—TESTIC WATER SEWERS Butte Water District Richvale Sanitary District California Water Service Co. North Burbank Pub. Util. Dist. Del Oro Water Co. Skansen Sub. (CSA #21) OWID Stirling City Sewer maint. Dist. tTTL Thermalito Irrigation District Thermalito Irrigation DistrictOther &T-2-A0muTUAL Wa're-fZ C.O . ITIES IRRIGATION WATER PG&E North (Chico) Biggs-W.Gridley Water District PG'&E South (Marysville) Butte Water District FIRE Pacific Bell Durham Irrigation District State TV Cable OWID Viacom TV Cable Paradise Irrigation District Richvale Irrigation District ROTECTION Table Mountain Irrigation Dist. E1 Medio Fire Protection Dist. Thermalito Irrigation District County Fire Department/CDF DRAINAGE DISTRICT MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT Durham, Oroville or Butte County RECLAMATION DISTRICT POLICE PROTECTION State Highway Patrol County Sheriff OTHER COMMITTEES/COMMISSIONS SCHOOL DISTRICT -�� H I GD RECREATION FACILITIES Paradise Pines Architectural Chico Area Recreation District Control Committee Durham Area Rec. & Park Dist. Butte County Farm Bureau Feather River Rec. & Park Dist. Community Association: Paradise Rec. & Park Dist. Richvale Rec. & Park Dist. State Parks & Rec. Dept. I CE COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS ►N 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 (916) 538-7601 TO: DATE: JUNE 25, 1993 RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION JEFF JARRETT Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: REZONE TO PTTs AP4011-420-015, nth 13.32 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SKYWAY AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SKYWAY AND CANYON RIM PLACE, CHICO, ZONED U S-H We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either .a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) . Please provide any factual statements, ideas for . investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above-noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. . We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, Larry Pa' er Planning Technician Comments• Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) . Yes No B. _TE COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS: . )N .7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 (916) 538-7601 TO: DATE: JUNE 25, 1993 RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION JEFF 'JARRETT Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: RF7.ONF TO PTTs A14011-490-019, n16 13.32 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SKYWAY AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF- SKYWAY AND CANYON RIM PLACE, CHICO, ZONED U S-H _ We- are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either .a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) . Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you_ can offer in your area of concern or expertise that. relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that: this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above-noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, Larry PafaCer Planning Technician Comments• Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) . Yes No 011 440 002 000 STATUS: ACTIVE SNEDEKER ERIC W & MARCY L: 011 420 015 000 STATUS: ACTIVE: 1441 OAKRIDGE DR JARRETT JERALD. � LAMESA 208328576 CHICO CA 95928 1967 SKYWAY CHICO CA 95926 L: 011 440 003 It 00 STATUS: ACTIVE MARCOTTE DOLORES L L: O i 1 420 016 000 STATUS: ACTIVE JARRETT JERALD 1445 OAKRIDGE DR VISTA LAMESA INC `20833ts'f876 CHICO CA 95928 1967 SKYWAY � CHICO CA 95426 } L: 011 440 004 000 STATUS:, ACTIVE FAVOR FAMILY TRUST L: 0 11 420 !%�17 000STATUS: ACTIVE' FAVOR DAVID C & SHARON E TRUSTEES PRIDDY CHARLES R JR & MARY ANN P 0 BOX 1297 CHICO CA 95927 2515 RAMADA WAY CHICO CA 95926 L: O l i 440 005000STATUS: ACTIVE. CORNYN JAMES WILLIAM & MARCIA A MOORE L: Ol i 420 019 X500 STATUS: ACTIVE: � CARTER GEORGE C JR & DORIS E 1463 OAKRID6E DR 1 . CHICO CA 95928 1321 CANYON RIM PL CHICO CA. 95928 L: V�i 1 440012 000STATUS: ACTIVE WOODWARD LARRY A & DONNA A L: Oil 420 020 000. STATUS: ACTIVE: LEWIS WILLIAM W &• JOAN 0 1459 OAKRIDGE DR � CHICO CA 95928 1339 CANYON RIM PL- CHICO CA 95928 L: 011 440015 000 STATUS: ACTIVE MARLEY JOE S & MARCIA R L: 0 l 1 420 OjR l 000 , STATUS: ACTIVE MCCAIG MAX B & JANICE L 1460 OAKRIDGE QR CHICO CA 95928 342 SPANISH GARDEN DR CHICO CA 9592£3 L: 011 440 016 000 STATUS: ACTIVE _AVER JAMES T & DIANE D L: Oil 420 025 000 STATUS: ACTIVE: KOROCK STANLEY W & LUZ CECILIA 1452 OAKRIDGE DR CHICO CA 95928 761 REBECCA CT CHICO CA 95926 L: 011 440 017 000STATUS: ACTIVE VENARD RICKEY A & SHARON T L: 011 420 026 0910 STATUS: ACTIVE: STEWART RONALD E & JOAN LORRAINE _436 OAKRIDGE DR CHICO CA 95928 400 SPANISH GARDEN DR CHICO : CA 95928 L: 040 600 029) 91910 STATUS: ACTIVE CHICO RESEARCH PARI; L P L: 011 42S?1 t%ft%f7 000 STATUS: INACTI'.' C/O DONALD E SWARTZ MIK ASSOCIATES E038 DALADIER DR RANCHO PALOS VER CA 90274 P0BOX 1477 . CHICO CA 95927 I L: 040 600 023 000 STATUS: ACTIVE NANCE CANYON PARTNERS L P L: 011 440 001 000 STATUS: ACTIVE:. C10 DONALD E SWARTZ SEWELL JOHN R & LYNN 2VJ38 DALADIER DR RANCHO PALOS VER CA 90274 1435 OAKRIDGE DR' CHICO CA ,95928 g�1Tt�r 1-'2'' O O O Inter-Depart emorandum TO: Craig Sanders, Butte County P1 °n� i"ng Division. FROM, Ted Crawford, Butte County Fire Department suBJECTPUD Rezone Pre-Development Conference. DATE, January 7, 1993 The following will meet the Butte County Fire Department requirement for the proposed .planned unit development on 13.3 acres on Vista. La Mesa off the Skyway,. east- of Chico: 1. A pressurized water system per County code is required with a minimum of 500 gallons per minute fire flow. 2. The hydrants will be spaced at a maximum of 800 feet apart. The locations of the hydrants will be coordinated with the fire department.W9is 3. All dwellings*-, must meet the Fire Safe regulations of PRC 4290. 4. All"green space", area to be preserved, must be cleared of underbrush to prevent a wildfire from reaching the structures. 5. A homeowners association or some other means must be generated to guarantee maintenance of the water system and the green space clearance. 6. Class A roofs on all buildings. 7. Vista La Mesa Drive will be open to Rim Rock Drive for a second access. 8. Lots 5 thru 13: all overhangs, including decks, will be enclosed with- non-combustible construction or a 1 hour, fire resistive construction on the canyon sides. If possible, Butte County Fire Department would like to have Canyon Rim Place connected -to Alm Bluff Drive with an all- weather access( with or without a gate) . If there are any questions please contact Captain Ted Crawford at 538-7994 or Battalion Chief Bill Redding at 891-2790. Ted Crawford Fire Captain CC: B. Redding- S. Kroeger Planning Department ,IAN 07 1993 OMVIlle,California .. t!; �"r t . � .. :r ' '� � � ' r i - � �. - . � + .. , i '�+ 4 � .. OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT Administrative Office ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1163 EAST SEVENTH STREET (916) 891-3140 CHICO, CA 95928-5999 (916) 891-3000 December 28 1992 Planning Department DEC 3 0 1992 Mr. Craig Sanders, Associate Planner County of Butte Oroviile,Cailiiornia Department of Developmental Services Planning Division 7 County Center Drive J Oroville, CA 95965 Re: "PUD Rezone Pre-Development Conference" - Jeff.Jarrett (A. P. Nos. 011- 042-15 and 16) Dear Mr. Sanders: District representatives have reviewed the information contained in your memorandum dated December 22, 1992 regarding the Jeff Jarrett rezone for property located on the north side of Skyway, approximately 300 feet west of Rimrock Road. District representatives have determined that the proposed project will negatively impact Chico Unified School District and, therefore, warrants further environmental analysis. SCHOOL FACILITIES FOR NEW STUDENTS GENERATED BY THE PRO- POSED DEVELOPMENT SettinP The Jeff Jarrett rezone proposes 13 residential lots. Applying the District's .43 student yield factor, the development will generate approximately 6 school age children. Utilizing current District actual student enrollment data and projected student enroll- ment data from already approved new residential development, each elementary, junior high and senior high school in the District is filled to capacity. To accommodate a 50+ percent increase in student enrollment in recent years, the District (1) reutilized existing school facilities, (2) utilized interim elementary school facilities, (3) placed relocatable classrooms on existing elementary school campuses, (4) instituted multi- track year-round education in three existing elementary schools, (5) occupied one new urban elementary school on a year-round schedule, (6) occupied one new elementary school on a traditional school schedule, (7) is in the process of constructing a third elementary school, (8) has placed interim facilities on the secondary campuses pending the availability of new school facilities, (9) acquired a site and has planned to build a new junior high/middle school and (10) has planned to expand one existing senior high school. The District continues to be a participant in the State School Building Program wherein the cost of constructing new school facilities is shared by the State and by the local dis- trict in a pro rata fashion. The State-wide need to construct new schools far exceeds A Mr. Craig Sanders, Associate Planner December 28, 1992 Page 2 available pro rata State funding; therefore, needed new Chico Unified School District school facilities have not been provided in a timely manner. Local Chico Unified School District revenues generated from school impact fees, coupled with the proceeds from the general obligation bonds approved by the voters in April 1988, will meet the student housing needs generated by local birth rates and previously approved residential developments but will not meet the student housing needs generated by new develop- ment. The District anticipates housing increasing numbers of students in interim facili- ties until funding becomes available to construct new schools. Impact of Proposed Development on Chico Unified School District Schools Since District elementary, junior and senior high schools are filled to capacity, it is evident that students generated from the Jeff Jarrett rezone cannot be served by existing facilities. In addition, there is currently no funding mechanism that will enable the District to provide facilities for these students. Based on the District's .43 student yield factor per average (1,280 square feet) house- hold, the 13 residential lots in this development will yield approximately 6 students that must be housed in District schools. The District projects that larger residential units will yield more than .43 students per household and smaller residential units will yield less than .43 students per household. To adjust for the higher student yield factor in larger than average households and the lower student yield factor in smaller than aver- age households, the District utilizes a mitigation cost based on square footage of habit- able space in each household. This project must be consistent with the Butte County General Plan and the impact on the District must be recognized and addressed in the project approval process. Mitigation of Impact on Chico Unified School District Schools The District is opposed to County approval of the proposed Jeff Jarrett rezone appli- cation unless the project fully mitigates its impact on the District. Acceptable mitigation measures include: * cash or in lieu equivalent (land or school facilities), approved by the District, which is equal to the full mitigation cost as described below; * imposition of a controlled phasing of single or multi-family residential devel- opment to coincide with provision of adequate school facilities; or * denial of the project. The 1991/92 per habitable space square foot cost to fully mitigate the impact of each residential unit is $5.29 per square foot. This amount will be adjusted as needed to re- flect the impact of inflation, school facilities needs, regulatory changes and other cost influencing factors. The full mitigation cost of$5.29 per square foot of new residential development will include school impact fees (currently $1.65 per square foot). The school impact fee will be supplemented with an appropriate amount of cash or in lieu equivalent (land or school facilities) approved by the District. The combination of school impact fees and cash or in lieu equivalent must fully mitigate the impact of the development on District schools. Mr. Craig Sanders, Associate Planner December 28, 1992 Page 3 Since the school mitigation cost established by the District is based on habitable square footage of the residential unit and District representatives are not informed of the hab- itable space of each residential unit in the proposed development, it is not possible to confirm the total cost of the mitigation at this time. The following calculation is pro- vided to allow one who is knowledgeable of the habitable space of each residential unit in the proposed development to make her/his own calculations: .CALCULATION Total habitable space in residential unit(s) times the current cost for full mitigation in effect when paid ($5.29 per square foot in 1991/92) equals total mitigation. For example: 13 units @ 1,100 square feet/unit x $5.29 = $75,647; or 13 units @ 1,280 square feet/unit x $5.29 = $88,026; or 13 units @ 1,400 square feet/unit x $5.29 = $96,278. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at 891-3209. 1 Sincerely, Michael Weissenborn Facilities Planner Administrative Services MW/mkl cc: Stan Hensley, Assistant Superintendent/Administrative Services y INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM TO: Butte County Public Works Dept. Butte County Environmental Health Dept. Butte County Sheriffs Dept. Dept. of Fish & Game Chico Unified School District Chico Area Recreation District Butte County Fire Dept./CDF CA Regional Water Quality Control Board FROM: Craig Sanders, Butte County Planning Division / SUBJECT: PUD Rezone Pre-Development Conference DATE: December 22, 1992 Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received concerning a proposed planned unit development (PUD) to allow a 13 lot residential development on property located on the north side of Skyway, approximately 2.5 miles south of Forest Ranch, 300 feet west of Rimrock Road, east of Chico. A pre-development conference, as required by Butte County Code Section 24-126, has been scheduled for 9:00 a.m., January 15, 1993, at the Department of Development Services, Planning Division Conference Room, .#7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The purpose of the meeting is to provide input from the responsible agencies at an early date so that any requirements or suggestions can be incorporated into the design prior to formal application. A representative from your office or written comments received by.this department prior to the meeting will be appreciated. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, B.A. Kircher Director of Planning Craig Sanders Associate Planner BAK:CBS:jlo cc: NorthStar Engineering c:\wp50\misc\pud-jarr.1 NorthStar PlanningDe art p ment ENGINEERING DEC 15 1992 Civil Engineers•Planners•Surveyors Orovllle,Gallfomla County of Butte PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 County Center Drive Oroville, Ca. 95963 Attention: Bettye. Rircher Re: Proposed Planned Unit Development Dear Bettye, On behalf of our client we request a pre-application conference for a proposed rezone from Unclassified (U) / Scenic Highway (SH) to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D. ) on AP 11-42-015 & 016 . The project site is 13 .3 acres located on Vista La Mesa Drive north off the Skyway. Enclosed are 10 copies of the rezone plat and 10 copies of the P.U.D. layout for distribution. Please schedule at you earliest convenience. If you should need additional copies or information please contact this office. Sincerely, NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING Rick Rodriguez 20 DECLARATION DRIVE • CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95926 916-893-1600 UEC 4CM0 21FIWX.Y 9/O -9 S/O -Z6 - 0 0 166 X30 JV _A i ih.0/,s6.ffl V „V,,SFozz IV 'COW/ SYO-Z6-/! k -M,07,lZ,99 5' O � cv 9/o-zb-// ;w"sr, s ih l � O.0 1J,U0 � �ro F. •� 6 cv oz ' IS,,W19/ v i a{.�tyt t 7 kj;Af j 4 1 1. APPENDIX I COUNTY%Mr. 3E&1L7TTE x y6, ENV=RONMENTAL CHECKL=STf, FORM M :(To be'eampleted'by'Lead Agency ntji r:< File':A89. 39,.. Lou ho:` f AP No' '.a,11-42-15,,aiid 16 I'. '•'RACKGRO[JNLI -� - t;•,'•' ;;:;'•A '' Jerald Jarrett' Mani of proponent 2. 'Address of proponent and representative'(if applicable)t •. GDA ' 67 S k a , .I,r'• 1. t'. 9 .. ran vents _.-,,. Chico, .. ., Oroville, CA 95965 iol 1. Project descriptions _ General Plan Amendment et II. ? AZMAT-bRY PMDMINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE - ��.- 1jQ. 1., Does the.project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environmAnt,`' substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels. threaten to a plant.or animal community; reduce the number or restrict the range of,a rore;'.,`'• .::•;:�`!%�•��}n;: ar en lant.or.animal or eliminate important examples of major of Cal ifd ornnia history or prehistory?.-., 2.`- Doer`the'project have the potential'to aehieve'short-ttrn benefits to the <;"v detrimrnt of long-term environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the / environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while ✓ long-tom iq=ta will endure into the future.) 3. •Do" the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively smallp but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) ♦. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? M, PZ23=XNAA=!E0_H (To be completed by the Lead Agency). On the basis of this initial evaluations I/ME find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I/ME find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environtment, there will not to a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MEASURES described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I/ME find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIROMOMAL IMPACT REPORT is required. COUNTY OT BUTTE, PLLAANNNING DEPARTMENT DATE: May 30, 1989 By: Craig 13. Sanders Assist"t Planng r Reviewed by: r� At . -Z- �' ldosa TvsnzTnaTsRv Auv 3o °8rsav uT uoypnpoN p 1991a6412 SM-49#9 30 3n9mysTu9Tdas 19WOU •g3 os s9TzM v u.T so 'v9ss u9 o3uT ssuvid jo s•Ta9ds ^au jo uoTsaapossuj •a 7tn-Td ;o s9Ta•ds p•aaDMu• so •sys '•nbiun Atm ;o ssogwm •qs ;o uOT3xtp*V •q —_ nuvid 3o iaTa�ids Am jo�s°gawput ,so'v°Taods j jssjeA p eta UTpn•&MC) •• iivTsuv2zgn9 uT iinsaa Lvsodosd nR LLT^ -BMW •0 tf+TP-T; vv qmx spiv=W W3vT°s_invn oz Azsadosd so •Sdood 3o •snsodxa •� i!°TTUns x s93v^ aTignd so; •TgviTvev OVWSq;o 293v^ j sunow •tis uT uoTsonpas •T •� �l sa nbv uv o ao daasa u _ &wuoTgvevau• so s2na Aq 7 3T q'3J IIij3 g T pun°sgT3so -TIvvnb io itiSiuvnb jp%so eqz ul ofmto 7• sa • ssa3vw uncs8 o AZTi Y3 uT �G q > •�• tss93v^ P-023 ;O.—IJ 30 •sys so UOT3OW P M JO uOT3v2nLY sr •dm3 oPTTLqouft1A3TPTgzn so U9SAo POeiossTp 'asnT . 'AITTvnb 3919A 6393sr z jo uoS3vs9319 Am UT so '8393v^•avjsns 03UT •SsvgasTG `J 14POq 2934^Am uT 1939^ rm;n+s jo Wnoma W3 UT •&MD •• 111=32^ POOU 30 ^oi; so 99sn03 Oq-3 03 svoT3vs931Y •P SUOT3viiv3vuT 32seina so u0T3vzTT•uuvga 61vn0092 uoT49322- auiDnl=T `squc'•uosdmT 98vuivsp •avjsas r3Tz-;J%` aci peog 'a 13louns Oav;sns ;o ' qunow Fm asys 9g3 so 'sus9agrd OSvuTvsp 's93vs uopdsosgv uS soSuvip •q 193039^gv9s; so •uSsm 3ag3TO ., uT 3-WOMe91,2939^ jo UOTiaasTp s9 991i1Oa 943,so;'s3lassna uT 883U.W4 •1; FV , iLvTsuvssgn•.uT,3IM1aOs Lv9°dOsd!Y3,LTTN' SPF[ -'.0`. r,•` �:.� ::':' :1diLwoTS9s so ALivaoT '9lvmTia : ;ti?,,;;'.• +.; UT •Suvya Atm 20 '0=494 9sn481oa 'suam9eM sSv 30 UOT3vs9aSY r�, .:af isounj so OXOC= !ssopo 91gwoT3. rqo jo uoTivasa mi •q 143Tivnb siv ;-Iq= jo uopraoisos.p so suoTssTa9 STV •v '. +TvTsuvszgns uT 1Lnvas Svsodosd W3 iTTM •i 19Psvzvq 2viTMT9 so •zniTv3 P-2 's9PTi8D- 'sOPTTOPuvi ' _c... 's9Xvnbgssv9 sv 4. spzyzvq aTSoioa o3 A3s9dwd so 9Sd•.ad jo ammodxy :••q ':r.'t,':.w:•i`:`�. u?gai.Cr3vu8Tsop =pilin siios eAjj=posd Aitvsn31=1a a.F•aTad,10 ss awl •S,';:;�,::' •',', jo vi so 391UT''Avq Ativ io uv9ao 9113 3° Daq «i7 20 •1=9239 so s9ATs v 3o 19uuv43Nn A3TPOm AM gaT"uoi202a so uoT,4Tsodop 'NOT3v3iTs•UT a98wga so 'spuvs RD" jo�uopos9so uoT3Tsod9p uT s98uvc:.,'- •;•:•�' 1•sTs 110 so uo 491sT• 'sTFos o UOTsOs9 i°gvw so PUT^UT •waaaul,:.!,•'• 4pig ' (• K 99 � t 1-124d so a So oa8 enb un A m o uo va PO1 so s9soa uo v T i T 3 � S3 TJTr �+T Tiansi RQ p , ^,e } isOsn�vo3 JaTias�av3sns Dimo?8 so`64dv2S°dOq rttIj i ,�•���',S�;1�i,�t :,,, �1Tjos •Ysrj�o SuT29soasoso so uo�savdmoa !L;u9vaaridsjp 'uo�ad+uaT4�1 4,�+++'...T FFii71�rn•"�- +� \J y 4F4• R f�FC ;1 i� `� 4 �rSw A ''�f) ..1. i i T,'M1I �,•/ � '.. . �y � �. �� .�SsC,+ luagansssgns �TBotoaB qT •98uvya so,`suojiTPi1Os ���LVv3suA�i 1 ���•i <:. ' �' }rF-oalf '�} C': 'i,-, •y'�a '�'('�. .Y' ,e:��)� �,�..e 14'{'�^x �3�i Yi�,i.st,�.�'��!...3'vi) al�?,r , + ,'..:.�' �' :!• . ,.'(s)1a04� Ps'""•+9114;to p9:Snb9s•9sv•u9^auv,„49xYW,'D�,uSSx„`TL* l° uOTaau9idzH).,. ., -c- 7 —'— 18931es09 Iv3vemu OROS sstti0 •; lspvw gtTPnl3uT `saT37I1ov; 3TLQnd ;o emmmulvN •s -� -- 0073TIT3v; IvuoT3vssow asg3o so ntsvd •P tstoolm •3 popoe3osd s3Tlod 'a 3 iuol33s3osd ssTd •• tss3Tesss 3uc4usse03 Pss93ty so MW so; peau v uT 31nses so 'uodn 33e;ds uv s"q tvsodosd sq3 LLTN -M=O IjU •hI 1 tsuvTnsopsd so nsTt363TQ ossl3Ttps so3om 03 spsvmm 3T;;vs3 uT esvesouI •; �— loT;;vs3 sTv so ITvs 'swoq-z-o3 su0Tl-ezlY •• ag,4/Ps' uemem so uoT3vin=j2 ;o sss33d 3uevsdomnlya�T •P tsw3sbv uotiv32odsumn SuT3spe uo -i=&; LvT;unsgnt ro i1 1f+Tjsvd—so; puvmsp so 199I3TIT-; $uT*-d WT3sTxs 11� s33s;73 •Q ✓ `— t3uewaoa 9131Vs• lvuoT3TPpv lvT3uv3sgns ;o uol3v3eue0 •v tut 3Tnsv2 Ivsodosd vtt3 LtTM xojjv=HjajgorR=5n= 6l puvwp v 92ves3 so 'Sulsnoy BuT3sTxs 33o;jt Ivsodosd sip jljjj *PMMM •ZI dod so d3Tsuvp luoT3n4Ts3sTP 'uol3v3ol ie3ly jv odosd�atp ItIMo Hvmd33 •11 iwald uol3vn3ves 63vtsvmuv V3Tw.s3uese;s3ul sLVTssod •Qbus2svmso us d ssuodse Y. tsuoTITPu03 3e8dn 30'3uepToiv uv ;o.:. 3uees etn uf'(uoT3vTPvs i0 stv'Ta 'veDT3Tased 1I70 `e3 pe3'fmTi 3w vA I"pnt-T) w3w3syns snopsysvy ;o esveles so uolsotdxs ;o;sTs V •s weloeuT ivsodwd sqA LITH' ' •01 tsoosnosys Ivsn3vu,elgvneues-uo4 Am jo.uoT391dso •V t8e3stw8es jvsn3vu Am ;o esn ;o 0313,stt3 UT ssvesaul. •v IIVT3uv3sans UT 3lnsys ivsodosd ey3 ITTM .• '6 '. 'tvesv uv 10 eon Pvvt peuuvtd so 3uesesd stn ;o.uoT3vso3Tv lvT3uo3sgns.s uT 31nsys lvsodosd,stt .mAl$ •4 &sell Duf.i�TT.3u?3T3Tu�Is s t% osd.lvsodosd stt4•11111, 3 avlenet'OsTou eseeos o3 sldoed ;o ssnsodxq •4t 'tstveel @$TougluT3sTxe ul 2e509s3ul; •v itvT3uv3sans uT 41-- Ivsod-d stt3 ITTM",'IIs�61i '9 , t 13v3T4W s;IIVI so ysT; SuT3slxv ;o:uoT;wolsv;sQ, p ti ' r i i. 4 �: .� oto - 7' P•..,�. .r =,'..<:';: •. :aa6 tslvmtuv 10 3ueweoM io u;TivsBls 333 aslam v ul ad 'vesv w o3u w o sv oeds ^w o„uo anp I F sivm� ; T ; T3 osiu a ��.9. rF2 ,� i'.• �� � 1.��Ak� v I )r�',:��a..sr:�'�r Et bt -+at.. s �,.- �l�r� s_�y r k;Ai��S/1 g:r �J.>�r. .7 1 fy'r� "'1hL�L�,���� t ' �' �'� �o} .•-t Lft<�'��Ly@T�T�f'�,7 S. � . � }`T'3 , 44i ,,� ;o.sslaeds psxaluvpus so seas u'asnblun rQn ;o sssgsnu�uT uoTiot."N 1•Q o y xy t w� ��a p�,.-t air' t .+4y r � f.•1fy,i��r r a"sr'6�; G' -.F r'. � S r s .ti R n w, imsTuvlso'�4sT3t�eVv.Puv.ttvT3'.�seTT3dei 8uTpnl-T slvmTuv Puvt''vp2T4)N;,x-,,- ti ' stvarTus ;o nT3eds tus';o sseQmrat so.:�setaeds ;o L3T-1P stp:,uT s8ttvtp , 'vim . ��� tivT3ua3sgns ul 3inses lvvodosd sy3 LITH •'Z1101 PMJ� 'fi -h- -pegas33v e8$ �� L�'•m 3zs�d@l TvTass•iod eq3 upnTA soon posovs so snoTSTT•s Rs13sTss9 lzlsasss Tvsodosd oq3 11111 -p j,9enIQA Tvsn3Tna aTutne enbTun 3ao33v pin"sPT" o2uvga I-TsA'gd s a— o3 TsTaue3od oqa •Avq Ivsodosd •q3 seo0 to Ozergo so am-4muas fOuTplTnq aTsoasTq so aTso3sTYlasd s o3 size;;o apot psev so IvoTsAgd esa"pv uT 31no•s Tvsodos4.oy3 TTT11 -q Io3Ts ivoj3olo9vgzsv aTso3sTq so opo3sTgesd s ;o uoT3zns32op to sso13sY2e3is..W3.UT 3insas Tssodosd.:!V3'ITTM . 's+ -Oi LseT3lunasoddo"TouoTavesaei luf3sTx9;o RZT3usnb so[3T1".sn'uodn'IavduT.us,uT 3Lnses Tvsodosd wp TTTM: '61 ?T. irs•lA aTTgnd oj'uedo •3ls sYAlssued3u AllvaT30Ynsos us ;o uoTavosz •q3 uT 31ns- Ivsodosd oq3 ITT^so #oTlgnd oYn 03 uodo AoTA so v39TA. aTuozs duv ;o uoT3xu3sgo••Yn uT 31ns•2 Iosodasd sip 11111 •SI lsps>nsssl g31vg Tsriuelod o3,oldood p eansodxq •q . In—BuTpnlzxo psysvq Ts+Taueaod so I(tnT-q Tv P--m gaiwq dlte ;o uo1aws0 •s ri suT aTnses Ivsodosd•g3,IIT11 'LT tTvsodsTP Duo 938"DT1 T LQ"vsp'mgvwRa:o3S • ' Sti r'7� Isue3s6s apdos,so jww •p . . .:f. 3A371Tgv11u"se3v11 to ' i•••3sAs ssssoi3s oTur— .!',i-q P ^+`9,,�+ — pt Y �,0.� ' •h l.I - .,�5A �7'•i jse8 lvmnvu J9 ie110d is'YY.. j��s�j r55 :i Y�lr jy+ t � y *� .: w�.'�J.� .y�e �ilt .xS.:b`J''a 5.•.�a++ '},ves.+t•t��"".r.f:r :�'t.. �f5 d1+�. 03'suol31LMTs;IvT3uvlsgnsr�v ;,�� ��,s j ,i r yS �#5,ta � to £se�e3s6s Aw.f`{oJ DaonS��ij iTnses,tTss eq}*1IT11;,�y �{Cq,�9I NR ` T—S•�•c 'r'� �4rkk 7 > 2' �',.55Xrlc'•�1M '•�",.i' ,5�(y ?'.. r +{<i�$ ,,.1� �-'.. ,, :. .:.. •.: ... :,:l,CBseue so,.ton;,;o:riunom Tvlaus3Wnsi;o •sp., f�itr ' U— II&TV{) —92r :uT jIns•s Tvsodosd •y3'11TM 'SI L ' a DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP ; 11-42-15 and 16 Project Description ;this projecC-49!16 General,.Plan'Amandment. to�ttiey Butte:County;Land.;Usg,,Element,:;;;,the.proposal will-:,change;the lend�.use p8esigriationy onl3 3,t� acres �fromL=Agricultural Residential' �eto rLoat �`; :Densityt+Residential:�!4*,The utiVarciit& located onaher;northi side,;ofr � "Skywaystapprokimately;400 f ft.'Wwest;of�:•;Oakridoo Drive y c•:The'.existing -land use�on-site;,-ist an:8;800psquare foot' ;;building,and,approximately�l acre:of;,piaved*.parking• are 1 ;; The' building-:-,has -been'wY;.vacant:for-then '' ,". 1etwo ;:.years tbut,was;,originallya•constructedsas,a: restaurant.'t Thee . •remainder.tofathe`parcel=>is;',vacant•::;sDevelopment" of this;parcel�.to::the?? maximum.allowed; {under,:;the::,;;requested,,General' ;Plan designation'.could �;;,• result,in 79:homes(( being,constructed onj site. : , , 7 i V . " �d;'10 `lb,3b The Generali••Plan'Amendment y.,from Agricultural=Residentiali;.to, Lows Density Resideniial.�would:alloav a maximum;:of:6:,dwelling:;.units;per ,. �Y,; gross.•acre:;>;This typeof;buildout:;could:'.result.•in'-°overcovering;of• upq °'. to:'. 35% of,:- they<';parcel: : •. Currently%',there::?is.'-approximately �;10+k'r:r: . overcovering ;by., existing<. structure_':°and .parking.;Mot:"-% a`The'„i development that•. may occur as a tresult• of this. project will',generate;'''. approximately 1.5• times more, storm"runoff compared to the existing,,,,',- land use. Through-.•conversations . with a,;. representative of the_project;it'was': learned that ,the, existing,,,building,-,.:and.,. parking-- lot <:;are;'.,to demolished:and..>;removed:; This;•.combined• ,with'new road•;ponstniction and,building •site;;.preparation, ;willxresult�in-soil�u disruption,,rover;:a#s`;• large,portiom•'of;the!sparcelxwhich•.may, affect-up,to.60t:60%.,,L. - ., ; In addition,.,;there will most; likely:;:$be`�{some.,,,-blasting x=required:.•to ,:,' install.underground utility,services such .as water,and.sewer.; lc: Significant changes in topography are not expected"as 'part of the proposal: - It is-recommended that building sites be , located in areas'of lesser slopes.' le,-3c:.' !:.Soils.on=site . are predominantly of the Toomes• soils.•saries ' The sol'is°generally shallow to very shallow and is underlain:by'an impervious-strata " of lava cap that extends 250 feet or- more.',.-.The erosion, potential"for this soil is ' low or' slight. ' This.is.. in•:its . natural state Which has grasses and trees to stabilize• it.;:When,the . soil.,.is.•disrupted athe'erosion hazard will •increase . significantly due• to':vegetation.removal and slopes near ,the. .canyon-rim. •:,Any,erosion�or sediment will>'be directed to Butte Creek:-Any disruption�_of:-the soil' should be' :done. during the months of May'through October-and exposed areas stabilized before winter rains to reduce erosion impacts. j lh: • The Butte-County Seismic Safety Element indicates a`{ fetult with unknown activity.`olocated approximately.-2 miles east of this*:Project:. In'1979 a geologic 'survey was prepared for an EIR 'on an -adjacent parcel: • The conclusion of the report is that the faults .shown on the Butte County Seismic Safety Map could anot•be located in,` the field.' furthermore, the possibility of significant earthquake activity near the site is judged to be remote. However, because of the proximity .. 'yurrr�Y�11YYiT�IYI'LtA ,to the Foothill' • Shear"',Zone.the.possib' A ty,col.earthquake;activity ",should��.z�;�.`'�:aken,��'�rl� ;f� 9�.,a�sr,�;�nt �`�Th•;,�geY:is,ogic�survey,is{aached�y. Ze '.'A�t maximum`bu id(iut additional vehicle trips Jin the'Eti area a„4 "?k increase. ;; ',;Counts: between'..605h'and,;790x:vehicle trips aper..:day,could ,be; E expected� is, -combined`pini.'existing','development,.:and a .proposed:"43_>: '1041eubdivision�;� i.mile,x?.ta:; tha.eastiwi114resulti:;in ;an;incremental; Ydecreasein,.ambient ;eir quality, from'.::;vehicular;emissions. > Another: simportantfgrowing;a,;sources;ofairs;•pollutants`; isa� residenfial-wood'`. •:stoves.";.k*od stovei;.'emittaarge, quantities of .particulate matter?and `.carbon monoxide. ,�2�,� � y ��L• ., �,`� .�.: �2b: .,'Objectionable odor :could:occur as a-result•of sewage:,disposal • facilities.. '-.This depends:',.on the ,exact type of-disposal-techniques'., .used. '3! Oils;, pesticides, fertilizers..and .other chemical9. associated" with�residential•uses will•be contained in'-storm weter-runoff. ;.',The- runoff will"enter Butte Creek and,may have someincremental effect•�on water quality. The overall- effect .-should not be significant since' most.runoff will occur during .the winter.months when the creek volume. is high:: 3h,16g: - Water will be supplied by the Gran-MLtual. Water System•that,' currently supplles. .the Skansen Subdivision Unit 1-and the -restaurant . structure on the subject parcel. . .One well - with•: a -. 25 .horsepower". submersible pump ; delivers,150 gpm°from',,-a 640 ,:,ft....'well.; casing:'. 'The sustained .pumping yield .of:,the ,well. was`500' gpm;.in '19a0:-' New developments may.require a •now • pump .or an additional ••well•'to' supply domestic water. 4a;6,c: There are known -rare or endangered plant-,species -in the immediate- area. The canyon rim provides suitable habitat for Bidwell's Knotweed., Depauperate Milk Vetch, Butte . . County Checkerbloom,•Butte,County. fritillary. .and possibly Shippee"Meadow Foam: -- A botanical: survey has been performed on this .site and -is- attached. Mitigation measures have been suggested in the report: '.. It is important that non-native vegetation not be allowed-to encroach into the habitat for these rare or endangered species. 6b-. '-.The primary noise factor will be the exposure of people to noise. from traffic on the Skyway.. Eloise levels in excess of 70 dB-can-be', expected within 100 feet of ,the roadway. The Butte County Noise . Element -.indicates noise levels up to. 60 dB LDN are -normally acceptable for low density�residential' uses. Noise levels'up : to 70 dB LDN are conditionally acceptable if noise reduction- features are incorporated in the project. 8: The proposed land use designation will be substantially different' than the existing, use which is similar to a vacant parcel., The . planned land use is Agricultural Residential which will allow housing densities up to 1 dwelling unit per acre for a total of 13 possible dwellings. The maximum allowed under the Low Density Residential designation is 6 dwelling units per acre for a total of 79 dwelling' units. The applicant has made a preliminary statement that he is proposing between 48 and 52 units for the site. 'F 1�l�.:d A� �i }' '•�S�ti•1tiF.°+.�a���/ae.::�4i�K`.;� -J .Sr.• �i�Y. � J�,t7K rii^�' � V"•� ,:1: r t f.:`t :2:.. 7`yyir�.. •;� �; ta.x•Th9'iBXSti }zI�Seri.a '•ie it's s�1. .r - z i.* �4� 10a. =r c� g,, v g rdi,sposiz,�n ysteM, onsistsK of awgravity, .col]ection;system' tha ;directs x;efflueat�down ptoAtwos, l!4 cadre opens tsewaget;pon ?fToor;!of,Biitte�Creek;Canyon::;;^Inr the?:past;'there w haaa;;beena some jdischarge'gof�,raw��sewage Tinto:1,Butte d Creekn, � The,t:; i ��aituation was , remedied by liningthe pons with'c1ay.�r�Howeverythe poasibility4 sti114 exists',that?r^some x* discharge rcould ,►occur�iv, from zn- future�`failure of k thei.pond: yy <f v �� h s „ ,; s z c5, 5`'�'{ f'!' hyp"`f.,..,:: i�`+.. 3yC,� ly...:tC '�' ? '":11 s ,fli,FBetween,=125 ' and'c205' 'new, resident`s.:rwould added td�'afi `" �., be:. e:�,Irea` 041dependlng, +on,the:;actual: ;nuinber;of>>r housing.units';;7constructed:;'2x:This. :wilh significantl'.,add:t. b-the:`existing.population:which, is••between.•50". ".find3 60 kpersons ;F': -�; k+ � t # + a°� r � ��+..+ � t�� r a r,;;;;•.: '' � � �r� 't •A`p �R."'%i� r t"x S -..y, r7�� ;l�j a �' ff'4w� �'•r� {,. i��� jtti�Mi�.;{i vt�:�;,��.�Y}A+;�''i,.'�� r•Y:+.. 3 13a;f'it °;.Increased ,traffic .fromproposals can_ be:,expected.,nY�t. ; max`imum'buildout;'�'allowed under:';.-the'••General.Plan'between;;.616.'~and°_,790: vehicle^trips•,per day could be•":ekpected:;:-:r"B-5sed;on the':`*applicant Is proposal of.:152 dwelling ,units- anywhere from 405 to.;520:vehicle trips .per..day.would• .be generated. •This;•combined:with the.existing,,traffic- and%traffic_._from a.:".proposed 43 unit subdivision,-. to themeast could . 3 result•in%average_daily traffic:volumes..�, between 102O�-,-7 and':1310-;trips- per;day at,•full buildout,of all;,lots.". The current:•traffic.;counts':.on the.-Skywayare 15,000:-:.daily.trips...,,just.east ',-'.Of Honey :'_Run•Roadrand 13,100,just•:, below the; Town of Farad This project will represent =the,possibility of'a 2` 9�rto 3 7�;increase in trafficL'om tha Skyway •;based,on ` �,'.'' '+St,3 , � 5°,.fL, i. '<� d :'r .. it s .., ,t,=�6 r ' t�l.:•r�.-.�t��[a��°`3 � .. :The.iSkyway'. is a``'highispeed :•.road. `Additional' traffic:crossing:and.' :entering.the •Skyway will incr"ease..the,.possibility..of .collisions: each7!of:;;.the last.:,three-years:;.:there:have•:,:;been at least 6.oaccidents a1 on4•:the,r,1;1l/2-:miles:of;:road 'that .front.this area ::,There•°•is:;already: a:z.left;':•turn..'.pocket• ':constructed:°•.,on the Skyway.-for, access:,to ,.this parcel:>and,one .:•fora Skansen;.,Subdivision• Unit:'.I:_ lso existing•.circulition'between the subdivision and the .subject;parcel,:•• The i proposed 'subdivision to the east is proposing'one new access;to the`_,Skyway.• and ,,`circ:ulation through to Skansen.• Unit'-:t.,1:;•".;.° The possibility- •should ..te - explored` of. limiting the number, f access ,points',to... the::Skyway.• . •Thc aght ,•t should also -he :given' �to;where,.-the proposed::'.'aroad' .from Blakeley :Schwartz_;--is-"'going�;"to'.intersect.,the Skyway,.": -Its intersection should ,meet one of the.existing';road;,access ,•points. No`!`direct access to the Skyway.. will be allowed from any individual lot created. 14a;,through', fa The project represents an incremental:<Sncrease .in demands.-for public services especially fire . and sheriff. The County's ability to provide adequate . police protection :is. al'ready under stress in the Chico area. The nearest County;Fire Station is 5 .miles away on.Fair Street, Chico. There may be increased administration and maintenance time and cost incurred to the Department of Public Works to maintain the sewage pondsiin.CSAv2li. If ,any new ponds are:.added the, ,applicant, may have. to provided:,mainiefiancesseparate :;from the existing administration by thea Public Works:.Department.4 lk, F* f t; d ,x The existing former ,restaurant'building ii ad:b'y ra.gr'avi'ty. ,.. ; sewage''4:collectioc:y',�systeW.'Ibrhich,'�also,,r serves H,the�' 23 lot';,Skansen ' gubdivision 'iystem.consists,of•,60' boll ection,';lines`:and0?*two••1•/4;, ' 6ewage1;:.,ponds'-•; _on':��the'" floor' of`Butte`Creek`'Canyon:'"' The'' original-; .treatment•, method•,;;Ynvolved , decomposition Xevaporation'.kand;;. percolation.,:;,,,It was,found that the percolation through the tailings along Butte`.Creek"was 'contaminating the_creek.-.•';The ponds.. ,have:been' lined=r`;pith�°.,clay:;-,which".'.has-i�:reduced'. .:their•r1,capacity to'••.,disperse:.-, effluent.; • New ponds.will, .probably : _be . required to serve • ,any new development:•c , There',is,a total-of,12.45 acres set aside for' ponds..orr . the canyon=,floor.: ..Any expansion or.additionµ;of new,, ponds.`will>:have;-•. to meet—the,requirements of,Regional'°Water,,Quality:Control;Board`and, the Butte County Environmental Health Departmant: 18:. The'canyon views are 'not :'readily open to public view. the . proposal will change the aesthetics of the site from openchaparral,• with.one structure to a low density developement. 20: ' An archaeological - survey .:has already .been -performed on the subject , site. No cultural or historical sites were found.. ]archaeological clearance is recommended. 11r,"',MANDATORY-FINDINGS 3. Impacts that are individually limited, but may have a cumulative impact, -are .,drainage, traffic, water quality of Butte Creek, groundwater withdrawals, reduction of natural vegetation and exposure of people to noise from the Skyway. 4. •Air -end .water . quality..effects, noise exposure,` and possible problems with the sanitary sewer system may adversely affect people with the development and on surrounding parcels. " Suggested-Mitigation Measures: 1*. ••.-; The northern. 'portion of the parcel -shall be designated a no development• zone. The no-development zone is , shown ' :as the shaded area ,-on the attached map. ' No development shall include no- landscaping, decks, vegetation removal or soil disruption.. 2. A 100 • ft. building setback line from the south property line along,the Skyway is required. An 8 ft. solid masonry wall with landscaping along the Skyway may be used to reduce this setback to.50 ft. 3. Natural vegetation will be retained in the no-development zone. it shall also be retained ' elsewhere on the parcel where feasible. All large trees should be kept. -8- 4. Construction site preparation and soil disruption shall be ; limited to the dry season, May through October. .�'(f{},'��JsTy 1i< 1•i sd. r! -.•. +, . �. r Y'7h n;7 �•'i`f�' ` J�.r i�ir,.f�� •'t`5`l5+ir: •.riF - , 1 �Y` 4 .k •N[V5's�v" natell*sedimenttraps•;:Ybelo*,plany.,diesignea*'die3.a.-.tp outfall�•'andx J fnatural,:draina e'c'hannels where draic.a o .is.`diverted,' ' above:'-any g $ }} Provide foih the. maintenance a and ,{cleaning' of,� these,�;,sediment+�'. lil ♦ :,;.t 'i�r• t,iAr J: f sl .�n.•. .,,:sediment' ,:�•na;.•'•:IN! % t ti 4Y. .traps:'?' ., 'c�,,.•t .,.;h .t ' t.;;`'_-�tl -t „� t1l f..: )'�l {°.••YL'. ls, it�za :- s: j..�• .'t..5„ ,i' ,rt-.• �''•{c �C, v �,_ r- +a�• 6. Final'drainage "'plans 'are , toy be ,engineere8 'in'cooperation with ' �� rr the:Butte:'County=Public Works -Department and must meet theirs' approval. "7. Revegetata:, all 'disturbed areas es . soon ?as" possible. '`' �aRevegetation must.be done before the 'beginning o'f tithe normal R' jy `rain season, November-I.' .�'.�l� y{if�.�F Yi s r}.'•,,,a�.n�'7� ��,f��!•i••.yjy , Yrt�' _ Y�`.'W,'s�rT r.-SY•fie '• °a�'� S 1 8> rUVater;saving `,devices shall'R'be ; hcorporated in 'construction of`"�,. :r Y,'new.'homes.;including,low:flow shower,s:,,heads, low'• volume .toilets;`' and 'insulated hot water pipes. t ,r 9 Provide d'funding mechanism to insure 'regular maintenance et 8. ,.sewage-disposal:ponds. , , The funding -process and maintenance 1 -;.?.program s: are.. to be •'approved by the Butte County. Public';Works'• k.-k.,.ts Department ;<;Environmental..,1Health'•.,w,Department';:•.r.:,+andz;,�Plenning. ; veAfrom* either thePublic ment Enironmental 'Health" De Department. stating responsibility_ fort �'f�� .administering':CSA• 21�pi11..,•bo'�required, ,+ t 1: �" .' . �.,:fs�',,. �� °:rr+''y��'�" +R;wjrt)< t '• 1". '`All sewAge,��ponds will`- be,.constructed':_to'have. at`'lenst 3'�ft. `of: ;":freeboard,•above the level-of a 100.year:storm• flood.level ii.'•.`'Meet• the; requireinents, of Butte County Fire 'De'partment`;=:which may . include'. providing fire hydrants at designated ' spacings,and emergency.;water storage -over.and above average. daily demands..;, ,,. i2. . :Provid!-:.A.;r:road maintenance agreement to .assure'• proper.road.. " maintenance. •• ,-. :The • road maintenance agreement shall meet-the _approval:of,Butte County. Public works Department..: Direct'any:.street ' lighting •away , from. the Skyway and shield ::.traffic from any undue glare, or light. Provide lighting -'at'the ; intersection of the access road''to.the .. .....Skyway for night time safety. 15:. Construct acceleration and deceleration lanes along the Skyway . . in accordance with Department of Public works requirements. CBS:lr -9- r � { f AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable.Chair and Planning Commission FROM: Craig Sanders, Senior Planner DATE: May 21, 1996 REQUEST: Rezone 93-25 -Jeff Jarrett: A request to rezone 13.3 acres of land from U(Unclassified) and SH(Scenic Highway) to PUD (Planned Unit Development), identified as A.P. 011-420-015 & 016, located on the north side of Skyway, at the intersection of Skyway and Canyon Rim Drive, east of Chico. RELATED ITEMS: None FOR: Planning Commission Meeting of June 13, 1996 ABSTRACT: Staff recommends denial of this application. DISCUSSION: This application was received in June of 1993. An initial study was prepared and mitigation measures were suggested. The applicant was not able to satisfy the Butte County Environmental Health Department's requirements for sewage disposal and the project has been held in limbo for the past 3 years. There have been numerous attempts to encourage the applicant to provide additional information to the Environmental Health Department or revise the project with no results. The applicant was given notice in December of 1996 to provide the necessary information or the project would be scheduled for hearings and recommended for denial. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: This application has been defined as a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and as such, is subject to the requirements of CEQA. An Initial Study Part 1 has been prepared by the applicant and Part 2 has been prepared by County staff. Based upon the review of the Initial Study, staff has determined that the project impacts can be fully mitigated. Because this project is being recommended for denial, an environmental determination does not have to be made. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS: This application requires that a public hearing be advertised and held. Advertisement of the public hearing was published in a local newspaper and were mailed to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property. As of the date of this report we have received no public comment. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ 1 C( RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the Board of Supervisors deny Rezone Application No. 93-25 making the findings and motion contained in exhibit A. K:\projects\jarreft.rez\pcagenda.rpt Reviewed and appr ved by: William.Fa/rrel, Director of Development Services ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ 2 u 1 EXHIBIT A FINDINGS: Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed rezone and tentative subdivision approval has not been shown to meet the Butte County Sewage disposal requirements; and Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this report, move to, recommend to the Board of Supervisors to deny the rezone to PUD for Jeff Jarrett on AP#011-420-015. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ 3 y i > Vicinity Map boa v Project Location o� Q- 0 ri REZ 93-25 AP#011-420-015, 016 mm07-1 FR-160 FR-5 Road FR-5 R-1 S - S- -- Project Location U -------------- U X1 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Applicant: Jeff Jarrett Owner: Same Hearing Date: June 13, 1996 @ 9:00 am. Existing Zone: U(unclassified), S-H(Scenic Highway) N Request: Rezone to PUD (Planned Unit Development). No Scale Assessor Parcel No: 011420-015, 016 File: 93-25 f �f AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable.Chair and Planning Commission FROM: Craig Sanders, Senior Planner DATE: May 21, 1996 REQUEST: Rezone 93-25 -Jeff Jarrett: A request to rezone 13.3 acres of land from U(Unclassified) and SH(Scenic Highway) to PUD (Planned Unit Development), identified as A.P. 011420-015 & 016, located on the north side of Skyway, at the intersection of Skyway and Canyon Rim Drive, east of Chico. RELATED ITEMS: None FOR: Planning Commission Meeting of June 13, 1996 ABSTRACT: Staff recommends denial of this application. DISCUSSION: This application was received in June of 1993. An initial study was prepared and mitigation measures were suggested. The applicant was not able to satisfy the Butte County Environmental Health Department's requirements for sewage disposal and the project has been held in limbo for the past 3 years. There have been numerous attempts to encourage the applicant to provide additional information to the Environmental Health Department or revise the project with no results. The applicant was given notice in December of 1996 to provide the necessary information or the project would be scheduled for hearings and recommended for denial. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: This application has been defined as a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and as such, is subject to the requirements of CEQA. An Initial Study Part 1 has been prepared by the applicant and Part 2 has been prepared by County staff. Based upon the review of the Initial Study, staff has determined that the project impacts can be fully mitigated. Because this project is being recommended for denial, an environmental determination does not have to be made. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS: This application requires that a public hearing be advertised and held. Advertisement of the public hearing was published in a local newspaper and were mailed to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property. As of the date of this report we have received no public comment. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ Y RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the Board of Supervisors deny Rezone Application No. 93-25 making the findings and motion contained in exhibit A. K:\projects\jarrett.rez\pcagenda.rpt Reviewed and approved by: William;F/arrel, Director of Development Services ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ 2 n EXHIBIT A FINDINGS: Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. . An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed rezone and tentative subdivision approval has not been shown to meet the Butte County Sewage disposal requirements; and Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this report, move to recommend to the Board of Supervisors to deny the rezone to PUD for Jeff Jarrett on AP#011-420-015. ■ .Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ 3 Vicinity Map i i boa v Project Location �b�i//8 phi °p H Q- a 3y REZ 93-25 AP#011-420-015, 016 P . tTI FR-160 FR-5 Riad FR-5 R-1 -- S-H Project Location --------------i BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Applicant: Jeff Jarrett Owner: Same Hearing Date: June 13, 1996 @ 9:00 am. Existing Zone: U(unclassified), S-H(Scenic Highway) N Request: Rezone to PUD (Planned Unit Development). No Scale Assessor Parcel No: 011420-015, 016 File: 93-25 t S K AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commission FROM: Craig Sanders, Senior Planner DATE: May 21, 1996 REQUEST: Rezone 93-25 -_Jeff Jarrett: A request to rezone 13.3 acres of land from U(Unclassified) and SH(Scenic Highway) to PUD (Planned Unit Development), identified as A.P. 011-420-016 & 016, located on the north side of Skyway, at the intersection of Skyway and Canyon Rim Drive, east of Chico. RELATED ITEMS: None FOR: Planning Commission Meeting of June 13, 1996 ABSTRACT: Staff recommends denial of this application. DISCUSSION: This application was received in June of 1993. An initial study was prepared and mitigation measures were suggested. The applicant was not able to satisfy the Butte County Environmental Health Department's requirements for sewage disposal and the project has been held in limbo for the past 3 years. There have been numerous attempts to encourage the applicant to provide additional information to the Environmental Health Department or revise the project with no results. The applicant was given notice in December of 1996 to provide the necessary information or the project would be scheduled for hearings and recommended for denial. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: This application has been defined as a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and as such, is subject to the requirements of CEQA. An Initial Study Part 1 has been prepared by the applicant and Part 2 has been prepared by County staff. Based upon the review of the Initial Study, staff has determined that the project impacts can be fully mitigated. Because this project is being recommended for denial, an environmental determination does not have to be made. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS: This application requires that a public hearing be advertised and held. Advertisement of the public hearing was published in a local newspaper and were mailed to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property. As of the date of this report we have received no public comment. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ 1 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the Board of Supervisors deny Rezone Application No. 93-25 making the findings and motion contained in exhibit A. K:\projects\jarrett.rez\pcagenda.rpt Reviewed and appy ved by: 07,William;,,arrel, Director of Development Services i ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ 2 ` EXHIBIT A FINDINGS: Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed rezone and tentative subdivision approval has not been shown to meet the Butte County Sewage disposal requirements; and Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this report, move to recommend to the Board of Supervisors to deny the rezone to PUD for Jeff Jarrett on AP#011-420-015. I ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ 3 Vicinity Map boa v Project Location Orovige �h�o� , o� Q- 0 ri REZ 93-25 AP#011-420-015, 016 P . FR-160 %FR-5 Road FR-5 R-1 _ - S-H ---------- Project --_ __Project Location U ----------------- i U BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Applicant: Jeff Jarrett Owner: Same Hearing Date: June 13, 1996 @ 9:00 am. Existing Zone: U(unclassified), S-H(Scenic Highway) N Request: Rezone to PUD(Planned Unit Development). No Scale Assessor Parcel No: 011420-015, 016 File: 93-25 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that public hearings will be held on Thursday, June 13, 1996, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following item at the following time: 9:00 a.m. - Jeff Jarrett - Rezone 13.3 acres of land from "U" (Unclassified) and S-H (Scenic Highway) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for property located on the north side of Skyway, at the intersection of Skyway and Canyon Rim Drive, identified as AP 011-420-025 and 016, east of Chico. (CBS) (REZ93- 25) ITEM DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 9:00 a.m. - Rajinder Kumar -Variance to allow a canopy structure within 45 feet of the centerline of East Avenue on property zoned C-2 (General) located on the south side of East Avenue, approximately 100 feet west of Tom Polk Avenue, identified as AP 007-060-045, Chico. (CBS) (VAR96-03) The above mentioned applications and maps are being referred by the Planning Manager to the Planning Commission regarding policy issues for senior citizen units. The Planning Commission will be the final authority on these items. The applications and maps are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION BARRY K. HOGAN, PLANNING MANAGER To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Thursday, April 30, 1996. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that public hearings will be held on Thursday, June 13, 1996, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following item at the following time: 9:00 a.m. - Jeff Jarrett - Rezone 13.3 acres of land from "U" (Unclassified) and S-H (Scenic Highway) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for property located on the north side of Skyway, at the intersection of Skyway and Canyon Rim Drive, identified as AP 011-420-025 and 013, east of Chico. (CBS) (REZ93- 25 ITEM DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 9:00 a.m. - Raiinder Kumar -Variance to allow a canopy structure within 45 feet of the centerline of East Avenue on property zoned C-2 (General) located on the south side of East Avenue, approximately 100 feet west of Tom Polk Avenue, identified as AP 007-060-045, Chico. (CBS) (VAR96-03) The above mentioned applications and maps are being referred by the Planning Manager to the Planning Commission regarding policy issues for senior citizen units. The Planning Commission will be the final authority on these items. The applications and maps are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. If you chal�lenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing.described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION BARRY K. HOGAN, PLANNING MANAGER To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Thursday, April 30, 1996. —.. .. ,.... ..Yr.. ._. ._ _ � � .�+. _ -. ... .. _. �.� _ __._. __ ., .. �VrwMy'..-i..�w►vu_.W��'^�--- r.•M"'�r+i^."JiL.r/•�=1w._S✓.L+' +..s�Y,'f COUNTY OF BUTTE 4 -- . -- -a- DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 00off` L` "_� U.S.P.QSIAGE PLANNING DINION o- KAY 12'96 %= 7 County Cm&Odra =' '< ' � 0 .2 7 4 Oroville,CA 95965.',197 - ... `roc 1► �/PU.ME i f 6808230 lb r, 4poFP JARR024 959732123 IN 05/24/96 RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER COUNTY OF BUTTE �y�'� .� «� OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT �N OQ` ��► '�U S.POSTAGE 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE a� MAY22-96 OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 �,. '✓ = 0 .Z 1-7 4 ` 4 PB.M QtR ETEF K 6808230 « RFD PUBLIC Jeff Jarrett 24 San Ramon HEARINGChico, CA 95926 NOTICE X JARR024 123 IN 05/24/96 RETURNTURN TO SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commission FROM: Craig Sanders, Senior Planner DATE: May 21, 1996 REQUEST: Rezone 93-25 -Jeff Jarrett: A request to rezone 1.3.3 acres of land from U(Unclassified) and SH(Scenic Highway) to PUD (Planned Unit Development), identified as A.P. 011-420-015 & 016, located on the north side of Skyway, at the intersection of Skyway and Canyon Rim Drive, east of Chico. RELATED ITEMS: None FOR: Planning Commission Meeting of June 13, 1996 ABSTRACT: Staff recommends denial of this application. DISCUSSION: This application was received in June of 1993. An initial study was prepared and mitigation measures were suggested. The applicant was not able to satisfy the Butte County Environmental Health Department's requirements for sewage disposal and the project has been held in limbo for the past 3 years. There have been numerous attempts to encourage the applicant to provide additional information to the Environmental Health Department or revise the project with no results. The applicant was given notice in December of 1996 to provide the necessary information or the project would be scheduled for hearings and recommended for denial. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: This application has been defined as a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and as such, is subject to the requirements of CEQA. An Initial Study Part 1 has been prepared by the applicant and Part 2 has been prepared by County staff. Based upon the review of the Initial Study, staff has determined that the project impacts can be fully mitigated. Because this project is being recommended for denial, an environmental determination does not have to be made. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS: This application requires that a public hearing be advertised and held. Advertisement of the public hearing was published in a local newspaper and were mailed to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property. As of the date of this report we have received no public comment. • Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ 1 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the Board of Supervisors deny Rezone Application No. 93-25 making the findings and motion contained in exhibit A. K:\projects\jarrett.rez\pcagenda.rpt Reviewed and approved by: William; arrel, Director of Development Services ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ 2 EXHIBIT A FINDINGS: Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed rezone and tentative subdivision approval has not been shown to meet the Butte County Sewage disposal requirements; and Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this report, move to recommend to the Board of Supervisors to deny the rezone to PUD for Jeff Jarrett on AP#011-420-015. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ 3 A , Vicinity Map a� v Project Location �b�i/le Ohl �O H REZ 93-25 AP#011-420-015, 016 ' 1 1 IT l FR-160 "FR-5 load FR-5 1 R-1 �a S Q -- -- Project Location U ------------------ U BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Applicant: Jeff Jarrett Owner: Same Hearing Date: June 13, 1996 @ 9:00 am. Existing Zone: U(unclassified), S-H(Scenic Highway) N Request: Rezone to PUD (Planned Unit Development). No Scale Assessor Parcel No: 011420-015, 016 File: 93-25 A T WP 2 / N R2 E. s o ., 11 - 42 (N 0911 fis'll 1 W 20c ro 3 34 - " TWP. 2P N, R.Y E. 3� 5 3 w j tf tf „f > 3 T»'P 2/ N. R. 2E. 2 2102 35 ,111 to 28 9 I �� / �� �c I •\ t - � / 400 643 I 11AP Co.Sr. Area'21 1 �h° .Roc. 26MOV. 75 Old �� I Co.. o/ aa"• • ?. /97600 / 4 4v `. \ LOT 4 29 i LOT 3 /4 LOT 2 J°o LO•T % ' • • gam' � - `M ��� _ �°Sf - � O _ .ee•11 ET •ii 3 z r•l c'�Y� 1�- 10* 3. 25.02 AC O26 ' ;296 2 7.91 43 ; Ac ♦`� c O 2/ 6.59 A C 10 act5.00 S \ 44 S '93-E. v / \ l5 .a I G s \ 2.! AC5 /O.00AC x R l /8 J 3 32 1 4 / 1 AC. now OIyYwAY CO. Rd. - I?S3 1.73 33 AG i ISD 5IC i i aG AC. --------- -93 - 40-0/ - Assessor's Mop No. 11=42 County of Butte , Calif. REVtSEO_ L-�2— J