Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREZ 99-05_PLANNING SEPARATOR SHEET q,„ hoz - WO /7 PROJECT NUMBER Raz R9 - 05- ` a PROJECT SUMMARY'SHEETf' FILE#: BEZ 99-05 PROJECT TYPE: Rezone APPLICANT: Feeney Engineering ADDRESS: 389 C Connors Court„Chico,CA 95926 OWNER: Robert and Donna Wray ADDRESS: 289 Tom Polk Cir.,Chico,CA 95926 ' REPRESENTATIVE: ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD)to convert a tennis court to storage units and RVan rking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD. PROPERTY ZONED: PUD LOCATED: at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue AP#: 007-410-017 TOWN/AREA: Chico GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:Medium Density Residential 1. Application complete: February 24,1999 Amount: $2429.00 Receipt#: 17017 2. Comments sent to: E.H.,LAFCO,DEV,SERV.,AIR QUALITY,PQ,BUILDING,AL.UC,CI-ICO,CDF,CARD,PG&E, PAC BELL,CALTRANS,WATER QUALITY,FISH&GAME 3. Comments received from: 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 6. Assigned To:Stephen Betts 7. Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No: Categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Subject to Fish&Game: Environmental Impact Report Gen.Rule Ex.-CEQA#15061.(bx3) Other 8. Staff Report: Project Video: 9. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH. 10. Publication Notice Written: G Display Ad Prepared: 11. Notices Mailed: �� �' / Number of Notices: 12. Newspaper Publication Date: 5 ' 7 '" / O ( C ) P G B 13. Planning Commission Hearing(s): Action taken: Special Conditions: Commission Resolution No. �J q 14. Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): / v2 7^ / l ' Cr M Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: 15. Type Use Permit/Send for signature: 16. N.O.E./N.O.D./APPENDIX G: Fish&Game Fees Paid: Yes No 17. Send validated Use Permit: 18. Assessor's Memo: 19. Copy of Use Permit/Variance to Planning Technician: 99-237 Public Hearing - Feeney Engineering - consideration of a rezone (item on which a negative declaration with mitigation measures regarding. environmental impacts has been recommended) to modify a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD, located at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue, Chico area, APN 007-410-017 (REZ 99-05 [SB] ) - action requested: A. SUBJECT TO FINDINGS I (A AND B) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED JULY 27, 1999, APPROVE A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN; B. FIND THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT CAUSE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE TO FISH AND/OR WILDLIFE OR THEIR ' HABITAT AND APPROVE A "DE MINIMUS" EXEMPTION TO THE COLLECTION OF DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEES; AND C. SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III (A AND B) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED JULY 27, 1999, ADOPT AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONE TO INCLUDE, BY REFERENCE, A MODIFICATION TO THE EASTWOOD OAKS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS DETAILED IN EXHIBIT"A" OF THE STAFF REPORT DATED JULY 27, 1999, AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN. (186 1) PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: 10:25 A.M. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 10:27 A.M. MOTION: SUBJECT TO FINDINGS I (A AND B) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED JULY 27, 1999, 1 MOVE TO APPROVE A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN; FIND THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT CAUSE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE TO FISH AND/OR WILDLIFE OR THEIR HABITAT AND APPROVE A"DE MINIMUS" EXEMPTION TO THE COLLECTION OF DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEES; AND SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III (A AND B) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED JULY 27, 1999, FURTHER MOVE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 3539 APPROVING THE REZONE TO INCLUDE, BY REFERENCE, A MODIFICATION TO THE EASTWOOD OAKS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS DETAILED IN EXHIBIT"A OF THE STAFF REPORT DATED JULY 27, 1999, AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN. M S VOTE: I Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 Y 5 Y(Unanimously Carried) BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES - JULY 27, 1999 7. Report to the Board Y9 Engineering] the Government Code requires the Planning Commission to make a report to the Board regarding rezone applications. The Planning Commission held a hearing for Feeney Engineering (Robert and Donna Wray)proposing a modification to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The Planning Commission recommends approval.of this project and submits a report to the Board in preparation of the Board's hearing. on this matter which is scheduled for July 27, 1999 - action requested - ACCEPT FOR INFORMATION. BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINTUES -. June 22 , 1999 Feeney Engineering, proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding environmental impacts and Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD, located at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue, Chico. APN 007- 410-017. (REZ 99-05) (DD) Mr. Doody gave a brief summary of the project. Chairman Leland asked if there will be enough open space to meet the requirement if this open space is taken away for another use? Mr. Wilson said there will still be adequate open space. He said that this was originally adopted as a PA-C. He said the open space was flexible. The hearing was opened to the public. Mr. Feeney said he was there to answer questions. The hearing was closed. Commissioner Lambert said if the open space is flexible,this is one more reason to support the PUD process over a flex lot process. It was moved by Commissioner Mooney, seconded by Commissioner Lambert, and unanimously carried to recommend to the Board approval to a modification of the PUD for Robert and Donna Wray,REZ 99-05, APN 007-410-017, subject to the findings and conditions listed below: I. Recommend to the Board of Supervisors to adopt a Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study identified potential significant environmental effects and includes mitigation measures that would mitigate such effects below significant levels; B. The Planning Commission has independently reviewed, analyzed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration prior to making its decision on the project, and recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt a Negative Declaration, reflecting the independent judgement of the County of Butte. C. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a de minimus exemption to the collection of Department of Fish and Game Environmental Filing Fees is approved. II. This project will not have an impact to fish and/or wildlife habitat, and fees are not required pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711,4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5. III. Recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance to include by reference a modification to the PUD zone subject to the conditions in attached Exhibit A and subject to the following findings: ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ MAY 27, 1999 ■ A. Find that the Rezone conforms to the policies, including the text and map of the Butte County General Plan and is consistent with all other General Plan Elements because the project will not substantially decrease open space within the East Oaks PUD. B. Find that the proposed use is consistent with the text and criteria of the Butte County Zoning Code and PUD zoning of the subject property because the PUD Zoning District permits storage facilities and conditions of approval require the storage area to be screened. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Division, 1. The existing solid fence on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained and maintained in good condition. The existing vegetation on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained to the maximum extent possible. Any'vegetation removed from this area shall be replaced prior to start of use of the storage facility. A solid fence at least seven(7) feet tall and vegetation shall be installed along the west side of the proposed storage facility prior to start of use. The required vegetation on the south and west sides of the proposed storage facility shall provide a visual screen from adjacent properties. All vegetation surrounding the storage facility shall be maintained in a healthy condition. (MM) 2. All outside lights installed for the storage unit use shall be fully shielded to prevent stray light and glare on adjacent parcels, and to prevent adverse impacts on aircraft flight activities. Prior to issuance of a building permit a plan showing the location, height, and type(s) of all light fixtures shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. (MM) 3. Measures shall be taken to control fugitive dust emissions from all civil construction associated with project improvements. Measures may include site watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. Dust control measures shall be noted on any necessary improvements plans. Questions regarding fugitive dust control may be directed to the Butte County Air Quality Management District at phone number(530) 891-2882. (MM) 4. No hazardous or explosive materials shall be stored in the storage unit facility. Hazardous materials are defined as any substance or material that,by reason of its toxic, caustic, corrosive, abrasive, or otherwise injurious properties,may be detrimental or deleterious to the health of any person handling or otherwise coming into contact with such material or substance. The property owner shall place language in the rental agreement for each storage unit stating that storage of hazardous or explosive material is prohibited. Prior to establishment of the use, a copy of the proposed rental agreement shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. (MM) 5. Use of the storage facility shall be limited to individuals living in the Eastwood Oaks Planned Unit Development. Public Works De artmen 6. Prior to the recordation of the issuance of building permits a plan for a permanent solution for drainage'for the storage facility shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained on-site and or ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ MAY 27, 1999 ■ . i conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ MAY 27, 1999 ■ DEPARTMENOOF DEVELOPMEN141 ERVIC'ES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to he provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME(If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ADDRESS: CITY STATE&ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (EOR OFFICE USE) "A ca NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT(If any) TELEPHONE (SW-04-62 LOCATION OF PROJECT Major cross streets and Address, if any GENERAL 0 AnON REQUIRED INF RM OWTELEPHONE NEW 1AME K hey ADDRESS: CITY,STATE&ZIP CODE: 7201 ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE in Square Feet or Acres M 07& EXISTING STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) 78w SF (Check One) (Check 19 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER [3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC E3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPUCAnON REQUESTED [3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT E3 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ REZONE C3 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP [3 USE PERMIT [3 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP [3 MINOR USE PERMIT [3 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION [3 VARIANCE [3 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION E3 MINOR VARIANCE [3 CERTIFICATE OF MERGER E ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT [3 MINING AND RECLAMATIO N 3 E3 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION -R OA F 0 FULL DESC 0 PROPOSED PROJECT(Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division,describe the number and size parcels.) of parce 0,X —UiN AmA K\4 AA� V%!U PlanningoiWeigli P1 A 1999 OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER,I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABO INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized,execute an affidavit of authorization and in�clu '%eda ith this plication.) DATE: SIGNATURE: V AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, ,Department of Development Services; 5,36 Print Name of Agent and Phonoumber -:;�7pq rR (.)(nn )Ys 654 e Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for on my property, identified as Butte County Assessors Parcel Number This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. Ow er(s) of Record: (sign and print name) R io Print Name Print Name i $i t Architect and/or Engineer: _ 2e Z Pat 53D Print Name of Arrhited/Eagikaft ber (( Q 3-��?h✓�c97 't� f�cC I o�- lJ Mailing Address _t FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date received: Total amount received: AP Number(s) Legal Description Owners Authorization Zoning requirements Project Description Copies of plot plan Taken by Receipt No. E.H. LD Plan FD_ Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit(Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $ 2, 4'L`t•00 as of Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Fled General Information: 1. Name and a r of owner,and/or developer,and/or project sponsor. 2. Address of project U X C/�k f4! ax .. Assessor's Parcel Number: 3. Name ress, nd to ephone nu r of to be contacted concerning this project 4. List and describe anyother relat permds d other public approvals required for this project, including . those required by ' , regional,state and federal agencies: 42 4 5. E)Mng general plan designation: 6. EASting zoning district: 7. How is land currently used? i 8. Proposed use of (Project for which this form is filed): i Project Description: 9. Site size: /,2, n-7,4c (Acres/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces:Full size: Compact © Total: ZOB_ 11. Plans attached Yes No 12. Proposed development schedule 13. Associated projects /Y �f- 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development *C2 Planning Division FEB 2 4 1999 ®mVlll®,('i$IIfQ 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 1 i Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential,include the number of un ,schedule of u it sizes, range of sale prices or rents,and type of. household size expected. 16. If commercial,indicate the type,whether neighborhood,city or regionally oriented,square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial,indicate type,estimated employment per shift,and loading facilities. 18. If institutional,indicate the major function,estimated employment per shift,estimated occupancy, loading facilities,and community benefits to be derived from the project. N/A 19. If the project involves a variance,conditional use,rezoning application,or any development permits,state this and indicate clearly why the applicatio is equir . ff permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit37//.h a' Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes(attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes,canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential / areas or public lands or roads. 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. _ 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 24. Change in dust,ash,smoke,fumes or odors in vicinity. 25. Change in bay, lake,river,stream or ground water quality or quantity,or alteration of existing drainage patterns. _ 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. _ 4Z 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. _ __IL 28. Use of,or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances,flammable or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police,fire,water,sewage, etc.including special districts). _ 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity,oil, natural gas,etc.). .31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. O Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 2 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project,including information on topography,soil stability, - plants and animals,and any cultural,Historical,or scenic aspects. Describe any exdsting structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 1404- 33. Describe the surrounding properties,including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical,or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),Intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses,shops,department stores,etc.),and scale of development(height, frontage,set-back rear yard,etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this Initial evaluation to the best of my ability,and that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signature for y- 97 K:\FORMS\EW-INFO ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 3 imam 1 998=00302 1 5 F Recorded 1 MSC FM 23.N ' Official Recwft 1 Re00,dftg X° ) CaBut v Of 1 Revco J.Hdgbes,Attorney at Iaw ) COMACE J..6RmM 1 500 Ygmcw Valley Road.Suite 250 ) Recerder i Wabw C eek,CA 94596 ) 1 Mrlea ) 04A M 21-Ja1-1998 1 page 1 of 7 Man Tax Stabmeab Tic ) Same as Deface ) j- ) WAesa RecededMin Tec ) btr.Bob Wray ) 110 ram Folk ChCL- ) Clocoy CA'95973 ) Space Above for Recorder's Use QunrLmM DEED i The undersigned declares that the documentary transfer tax is S--()-- since this is a conveyance transferring grantor's interest into a Revocable Living Trust. E, k. Silo of Ag Tax-Kerin L Hugbm Anomey at Law Unincorporated Area Cityof C k i CO Tax Parcel No.oo7-41/0-017 , WTMOUT CONSIDERATION,ROBERT J.WRAY,also known as BOB WRAY and DONNA MARY WRAY hereby quitclaim to ROBERT J.WRAY,also known as BOB WRAY r. and DONNA MARY WRAY,Trustees of the WRAY FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST dated Z I (Living Revocable Tru4 the real property in the county of Butte,State of Catifornia,described on the attached Exhibit"A". Commonly lm)wn as 'SO "�«..AIL rjMjg-_c!,;cp,C-j . Dated: 7-9- 78 0";f 7 An)�--`-tel BERT Y DONNA MARY WRAY Planning Division FEB 2 4 1999 oroville anomia 98 - 30215 STATE OF CAIIFORN A ) )SS COUNTY OF Bu't t e- ) On . r before ICa.�,:•,.i. H.,�4.cs . pasonatly appemod ROBERT 'WRAP and DONNA MARY WRAY,pasoaally to me(or provod to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)to be the pow=whose names are subscribed to;the within fimbumcal and aclonowledgW to me that they eseccued the same m their authorized capacities,and that by their sigoatees on the msbment the persons,or the emuty upon behalf of which the posoos act4 cwmded the instrument. Wl INESS my hand and official sal. HUGHcS p YTti S—Y 'J-A� AIiS95il'.1.^ ...K .._-lae __ �_.^.�:�_.....�._ _ — '' JI '• 98 - 3021 EXHIBIT 'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTU M ALL THAT CE3TTAEN REAL PROPem snuATEE)EN nE coucY OF BUTTE STATE OF CAL I Foam IA • • • ' • . DESS AS FOLLOWSt lfi I AR LOT 1, AS GROW ON TEAT CERTAIN HAP ENTITLED, wZUT FOOD OARS COKDO@QIK= SUBIIIVISION0, WHICH MAP WAS RECORDED IN TETE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THZ COMM OF BUTT8, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON HAY 10, 1963, IN BOOK 91 OF�HAPS, AT PAGES) 26 AND 27. EXCEPTILEG THS THM FOIJAWX NO DESCRIBED PORTION OF SAID LOT It BEG11MING AT MR.LBOS'1' RASTERLY COSS= OF SAID LOT It THE ICE ALONG THE NORTNURLY BMMM In= OF SAID LOT 1 T= FOLLOLMIG TWO COURSES AND DISTANCESt NOIr. 61 DEG. 19. 000 REST, 144..59 FEETI SOWN 71 DEC' 19* 579 WZST, 103.44 F=s TMMCE LEAVING THE NORTHERLY B DARZ UMN OF SAID LOT i THS FOLLOW= TWO COMMAND DISTANCES: SCUTA 18 DEG. 401 030 EAST#- 182.40 F&T? SOUTH 61 DEG. 19' 00• EAST, 80.51 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 1; Tl=CE CONTINUING AU)NG THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 1 THE FOLLOWING FIVE COURSES AND DISTANCES: NORTH 211 DEC. 411 00- BAHT, , 37.93 FRET; NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CONCAVE CUlM TO TEZ RIGHT (THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 73 DEG. 41* 00- EAST), THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEG. 00' 00", AN ARC LENGTH OF 31.42 FEET? RORTH 26 DEG. 41• 00" EAST, 24.00 FEETI Y ALOE= A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CONVEX CURVE TO THE RIGHT (THE CEIORD OF mucH BEARS NORTH 16 DEG. 19. 00• WEST), TACH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEG. 000 00", AN ARC LENGTH OF 31.42 FEEtTI NORTH 28 DEG. 410 000 EAST, 97.73 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINHING. ALSO EXCEPTXM THEREFPbOfF4 THE FOLLONING DESCRIBED PORTION OF SAID LOT II COD!?48)iCING AT TIE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF NAY LINE OF PANAMA AVENUE AND THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF NAY LINE OF TOM POLE AVENUEI THENCE SOUTH 52 DEC.. 41' 00" NEST A DISTANCE OF 18.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 11 THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTHLASTERLY. BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, ALONG THE ARC OF A 226.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT (THE CEEORD OF NHICH BEARS NORTH 8 DEC. 04' 45" WEST), THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58 DEC. 28t 31•, AN ARC LENGTH OF 230.65 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCELI THENCE FROM SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY 98 - 3021 E X H 1 0 1 T OW LEGAL DESCRwT"m ALL THAT CERTAN REAL PROPER V SnUATED P#THE COLN" OF BUTTE STATE OF CAL I.FOM IA • • • . DESCRM AS FOLLOWS Iter LL3#E OF RAID LOT 1 THE FOLLOW NG TRREB COURSES AND DI8TANCZ13# Y ALONG THE ARC OP A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CONCAVE CURVE TO T= RIGNT (THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 68 DEG. 55* 160 EAST). TH3WOM A ORAL ANGLE OF 95 OEG. 31. 29", AN ARC LENGTH OF 33.34 FEET# SOMM 27 DEG. 461 510 RAST,' 24.00 FEETI NORTHWESTERLY ALONG TY= ADC OP A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CONVLO; CURVE TO THE RIGHT (THE CHORD OF IMCH BEARS 901=8 17 DEG. 19. 000 !ZST) TI9RC M A.CENTRAL ANGLE OF 92 Lid. 00. 000, AN ARC.LZK= OF 32.11 FEET? TMMCE LEAS THE Y BOUNDARY I OF SAID LOP 1, .SOMS 28 DEG. 41' 000 IST A DISM= OF 31.06 FET TO THE IwINNIna OF A 226.00 FOOT RADXW C=ChV3 CUM TO TIM LEFT: 21M= AtMG SAID 226.00 FOOT RADXUS CUM TO THE LEFT (TRE CHORD OF I MICR BEARS SOUTH 24 DEC. 55• 160 DET), TERM= A C 3fl=AL D XGLB OF 07 DEC. 311 290 AN ARC LL{MGM OF 29.68 FEET TO TRE T= POM OF BEGINNING. ALSO ZXCZPTING THEREFROX ALL OIL, GNS AND OTHER HYDROCARBONS AND KINL:L3MA NOW OR AT ANY TLM RERSAPTM SITUATE THEREIN AND AND WHICH KAY BE PROLRICRD THEREFROM TOGETHER MITA THE FREE ARD U13LILLITED RIGHT TO MINE, DRILL, BORE, OPERATE AND RMSOVE FROM BEITEATR THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND, AT ANY LEVEL OR LEVELS. 50 FEET OR KOBE BELOW THE SURFACE OF SAID PROPZRTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVULOPME T OR REMOVAL OF ALL.OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBONS AND NII#BRAIB SITUATED THEREIN OR THEREUNDER OR PRODUCIBLE THEREFROM. SAID CAIS WERE QUITCLAlMD TO A DEPTH OF 500 FEST BY QUITCLAIM DSD RECORDED MAY 10, 1983, IN BOOR 2823, PAGE 153, OFFICIAL PJNNX Di. laam A PORTION OF PARCEL 1, A8 8T(OWN ON TEAT CERTIITH PARCEL NAP, RECORDED IN THS OPTICS OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUT?8, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON APRIL 3, 1978, IN BOOR 65 OF NAPS, AT PAGX(S) 60, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS1 BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHwzSTERLY RIGHT OF MAY LINE OF PANAMA AVENUE AND THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF TON POLIO AVENUE? THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHFASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 THE FOLLOWING FOUR COURSES AND DISTANCESs SOUTH 37 DEG. 190 000 EAST, 51.36 FEET? NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT, 125.00 FOOT RADIUS CONVEX CURVE TO THE LEFT (THE CHORD ' MNTTIIt►Rf) 98 - 30215 EXHIBIT LEGAL MCRIO'TtON ALL 7HAT'CERTAIN PEAL PROPERTY Sf1UA7Ea PI 7W CMMy OF EiIiTTE STATE OF CAL 1 FORM I A • • , DESCRgD AS FOLLOWS; >tl. 2-tat C00lPI>6�D OF.WHICH BEAM NORTH 20 Daft. 41f 26' SAM, -TMOUGH A CEIITRAL Mm= OF 36 DEG. 1410 516, AN ARC LMWTH OF 79.22 FRIT TOA POINT OT REVERSE C%JRVATUREf 1 a MASTERLY ALONG A 125.00 lour RADIUS REVERSE CURVE'TO 210 RI Mr (TIM CHOW OF WHICH HEARS NORTH-17 DW. 47• 00■ EAST) THMUGH A COAL AgGLN OF 30 DEG.. 22. 00", AM ARC LUMTH OF 66.25 lETI NORM 32 DEG. 54. 00" EAST., 10.65 FEETt THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTHEASTERLY Sf MM%RY LII:M OF SAID PARCEL 1, NORTH 62 DEC. 07• 58" WT, A DESTAKCR OF 157.41 FEET TO A POIITr ON A 226.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE COWAVB EASTERLY AND THE SOUTRZASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 1 or SAID EASWOOD.0ARS CO1 O]EUR SUDDIVISIOIIt THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERSTERLY BOUNMY LIENS OF IDT 1 ALONG A 226.00 FOOT RADIUS CURV TO THE LEFT (THE CHORD OF MIC13 BEARS SOUTH 12 DEG. 09• 30" EAS4) TIMOUGH A CEMMAL MOLE OF 50 DEG 19. 00' AND AM.ARC 'UWGTN OF 190.47 FM TO A POINT Ill THE 3STERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PAS AVENUE# THE€= ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LIME NORTH 52 DEG. 41' 00• EAST A DISTANCE OF 18.00 FIST TO THE POINT OF BEGINIIINO. EXCEPrM THEREFROM ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER HV ROCARBONS AND MINERALS NOW OR AT ANY TIMa HEREAFTER SITUATE THEREIN AND THER8UND2R AND MICH MAY 8E PRODUCED THEREFROM TOGETHER WITH THE MR AND U I.UUTED RIGHT TO MINE, DRILL, BO=, OPERATE AND RAVE FROM 89"ATH TILE SURFACE OF SAID LAND, AT ANY LEVEL OR LBVEIA, 50 FEET OR-MORE BELOW THE SURFACE OF SAID PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVHLDPn=r OR RIMOVAL OF ALL OIL, GAS AND ETHER HYDROCARBONS AND MINERALS SITUATED THEREIN OR THEREUNDER OR PRODUCIBLE THEREFROM. SAID MINERALS WERE QRTITCLAIMED TO A DEPTH OF 500 FEET BY QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED MAY 10, 1983, IN BOOR 2823, PAGE 153, OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAR= II! A 12.00 FOOT WIDE NOH-EXCLOSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING, MAINTAINING OR REINSTALLING A SANITARY SEWER PIPE LINE, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO EXCAVATE FOR, REMOVE, REINSTALL AND CHANGE THE SIZE OF SAID PIPE LINE, ALONG WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS THERETO, OVER, UNDER AND ON THE FOLWWING DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LANDI CONTINUED 98 - 30215 EX.0 .1 .81T 7A' LEGAL DESCIMM ALL THAT COITAN I AL F190 MM SITUATED N THE CCXrM OF BUTTE STATE OF CAL 1 FORM IA • • ' • . D AS FOLLOW"& ENCELUL A POVM.XCN .OF PARCEL 1• A8 880 ON THAT CERtAIN PARCEL MAP, LtECO IN THE OFFIC2 OF TM RECORDER OF THE COMITY OF MrM, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, OH APMIL 2, 1978, IN BOOK 65 OF MAPS, AT PAGE(8) 60.E /DORS PARTICOLARL.Y DESCRIBED AS•FOL1,010ss AT T= MOOT RA8TZRLY OOME@t OF'LOT 1, AS SHOWN ON THAT CMUAM IEAP ENZI'P w, .OAEB Cmw=ffm SUBDIVISION., MaCfB MF =8 SBD IN TIM OMCB'OF 'PSB RECORDER OF THE OOUM OF B8P1TE, STATS OF ChlaXPOMM, ON MAY 10, 1982, 1N BOOR 91 OF MAPS, AT PAGE(8) 26 AND 271 H SOUTH 28 M. 411 00' /BEST A DISTANCE OF 257.637M TO A POINT IM TILE Y 80UIBDARY LINE OF SAID IA't 1 AND THIO minus PDI4lT OF BE'SIN m No FOR THE mmxn DESCRIBED PARCELI TSEMCM COXTINU= MOUTH 28 MS. 411 00" WMT A DISTANCE OF 6.00 FEZT.j TES CE L MIM TOD1 8 OVMASTERLY BOUNDARY LUM OF LOT 1 OF TSM MASTMOOD OASTS C .80F.DIVIOXON, SOUTH 62 DEG. 21' 00" EAST A 6I8TA= OF 1S0.@S F 1 'SCE KOM 28 DEG. 41. 000 EASY A DX5=CE OF 12.00 Fffia l TiMMS 00112TH 62 DEG. 210 00' WEST A STANCE OF 150.00 FEET TO A POIIPt III TSE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LIVE OF BUD IAM 1 iTHMCE ALOOG THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, SOUTH28 DEG. 11. 00- HEST A DISTANCE OF 6.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SIL - AM EASSIaWt TO ENTER, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE TILES AND EQVIPIO t AIND N2ITw Tt THE, REMOVAL OF ANY TOP SOIL, RETDRIIZI= THE PROPIR TO BUBSTAMYIALLY ITS NATURAL GRADE AFTER INSTALIATION, REPLACW T OR REPAIR, AS THE CASE MAY BE, OF THE DRAINAGE. TILES OVER THE NORTHERLY 12 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS OF LAND: A PART OF IAT 2, AS OHM ON THAT CMMAIN NAP MITLRD, 08URSON TRACT NEAR CIlICO, BUTTE CO., CAL.•, WHICH NAP WAS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON MARCH 9, 1911, IN BOOR 7 OF MAPS, AT PAGE(8) 14, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLIMS1 - CONTINUED 9 � - 302i5 EXN181T 'A• LEGAL DESCAPTUM ALL THAT CEWAN REAL PROPI W an A1ED N 1HE COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CAL t FORM 1A , DESCREM AS FOLLOWS man mn= AT "m Y COR9CE4t OF SAID LOT 2, AND RUM TH=CE saummasTmw Awm SHE LIQECTUM LOTS 2 AND 1 OF SAID '8" 4Z`a', 660. FLS TO A POINT IN T10 CMITILR OP PANAMA AVENUE; THMCCZ Y AXDNG T= CZffrZR PARANA AVEYUg, 211.0 FEET; THENCE MLT AFD'PARALIZL WITH TH3 LINE BETWEEN LOTS 2 AND 1 O! SAID SURSON TRACT, 660.0 TIFF TO A POINT IN TWM NOBLY LINE OF SAID LOT' 2; THS Y ALONG THE Y LTNS OF SAID LOT 2, 231.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEP i TIM04MMEM ALL OIL, GAB AFD OTHER HYD AND HImmw AD fmanv2o IN M DIAD FAM BAM O! AP=CA NATIONAL TRUSS` AMD SAVn= AVIATION, TO W. H. Knwn AND PHYLLIS METZG=s, HIH vIFE, DxT= MAY 25, 1944 'AND RECORDED JOKE 14, 1944, IN BOOM 333, PAGE 39, OFFICIAL . REFERENCE ASRCOT 18 BEING MADE TO SAID DRZD FOR THE PARTICULARS THEREIN SST FORTH. ALSO A POIMOR OF THA? CZRZhIN PARE' OF IAT 2, AS STCO= ON THA? CBRTAID ARNP Ear ETLRD, "BURSM"BURS. TRACT BEAR CHICO, BUTTE CO., CAL.•, IMICH ISP WAS .IH TEM OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BIDTI'E, STATE OF CAY.IFORRIA, ON MARCH 9, 1911,. IN BOOR 7 OF MAPS, AT PA 2(S) 14, ACQUIRED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY DEED DATED JULY. 15, 1959, RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1959, IN BOOR 1015, PACE 425, OFFICIAL RECORDS. SAID PORTION IB ALL THAT PART THEREOF LYING NORTHEASTERLY OP THE FOL1,011 3 DESCRIBED LINES BEGINNIIBG AT TRE SOUTRSAST CORNER OF SAID PART ACQUIRED BY TRE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY SAID DEED DATED JULY 15, 1959, SAID POINT ALSO BEING DISTANT 150.05 FEET NORTHEASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE •D=• LINE AT ENGINEER'S STATION��Q"Dt" 132+90.38 OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS' 1956 SURVEY BS'TEN CENTERVILLE ROAD AND 3.6 MILES NORTH OF CHICO, ROAD III-BUT-3C, ChC,DN THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PART NORTH 37 DEG. .44' 30" NEST, 135.70 FLET! THENCE LEAVING THE EASTERLY LINE.OF SAID PART NORTH 46 DLG. 05' 09" WEST, 475.06 TEST/ THENCE NORTH 43 DBC. 45' 34` NEST 668.71 FEET TO A POINT. vC Q�� rA.. - -1^sTrMmL 2r �Z c i Z2 . tit S�N�vn� N«3Ha� pct N�s.••.t.?ra�'�� C�h© �L�3`l�stc,rz� C�\V® e h O 7LOQ 4 coo - 060 - Lee' C- cv��oz so _S h C COO 6 C) ION12 01O C7j� -� S'l3C'�'yCiS �:)ne z lms L S-�j <; Oo i LOO -C (V E) L 14 - O 11-1 L,OO SCD--66 -Z2t-6 0 L h -LQ© 4--4dY _S A, I � � i °I S O -^� Qt �-•���t-Ir�a?� Z J M696 WD 03 1 H.,.:) 3AY MOd WW 9022 3N!7nvd GNU V 3GA13 91AAM ou isnivis 000 890 060 LOO 11:3 OTM6 W MUSNlisne 1010 HAV SUNVIMM 000T U8VS I NV3f smov vusmi 3v anivis 000 990 060 LOO :13 10656 V3 ollu DIVIA 3AW SNINNUH3 009T Nim Him 1 30N38MVI NIAIV WAIIS isnoi SNIAII 83AMS ow onivis 000 `?EO 090 LOO :13 EL606 VO 0 3 i H'-) 013 OOOMNI\!A-'! 8 A VIOMIUd !Hl-.:� ow usnivis 000 STO 000 LOO : 13 EL06 VO 03 1 H'.'.D 81D GOOMNAI H 331HIMS BA0089 ou ssnivis 000 KTSCS 000 LOO :13 EL626 VJ 03 1 HZI WO GOOMNNA! 9 S331sn8l NNWOf A183A38 N011111 isn8i SNIAII NNVOf AIMA36 N01711--l- ov %snivis 000 ETO 000 LOO 113 EL606 V3 031HO 813 GOOMNNA! S I 3NVIU A SINN30 WVH83d ov isnivis 000 2TO 020 LOO 113 M6% UO 03IH3 U13 GOOMNA! 47 (VAG 83) M NOMUS VAIIS 3v isnivis 000 TTO 020 LOO :13 EL: 007 410 017 000 STATUS : AC WRAY FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST WRAY ROBERT J & DONNA MARY TRUSTE ' 110 TOM POLK C I R / CHICO CA 95973 EL: 007 040 008 000 STATUS: AC WESTMAN ALLEN L & MARILYN C 478 PANAMA AVE CHICO CA 95973 � � EL: 007 040 011 000 STATUS: AC MACKINNON JOSEPH M & KELLY LYNNE ' 484 PANAMA AVE ( CHICO CA 95973 EL: 007 040 012 000 STATUS: AC : ' ' - -- � _ ( JUNGLING FAMILY TRUST JUNGLING KENT V & SALLY H TRUSTEE ! 492 PANAMA AVE ' CHICO CA 95973 ' EL : 007 040 018 000 STATUS: AC TOSELLO M D & MELISSA J 466 PANAMA AVE � CHICO CA 95973 � EL: 007 050 004 000 STATUS: AC REID RICHARD R P O BOX 1702 CHLCO CA 95927-1702 ' � EL : 007 050 005 000 STATUS: AC ABOLINS PETER & EDITH P 483 PANAMA AVE ' � CHICO CA 95973 ' | ! , EL : 007 050 006 000 STATUS: AC HILL BILLY J & LEWNA R 489 PANAMA AVE CHICO CA 95973 EL: 007 050 007 000 STATUS : AC SAMUELS CHARLES 8 & ALEXANDRA L S � 2597 TO POLK AVE CHICO CA 95973 EL : 007 050 008 000 STATUS: AC LIMA TATYANA A 2591 TOM POLK AVE CHICO CA 95973 EL696 V3 0 3 1 H EL606 V3 0 3 1 H'D 13 1OBV81W 13 E292 AAM OSVd 13 L92 isnui v 31HVW 1 d 15301V 01%3130 isnu V 31HUW 1 d 15381V 018V0130 V1310 1 3 A8N3H siiHn,,.:) 3w isnivis 000 2S-`O 05T LOO :13 3v isnivis 000 EOO OOT LOO ill --! EL626 VO 0 3 1 H 92626 V3 031HE, 13 IOSVHIW 13 9292 iS iHUSOH 525T A 3113!HNBH 1 8 GIAVO NOSh3GN3 ! W H13BUZ113 q a31HA931S Cil 113HOUIS; ow isnivis 000 IEO ONT LOO %13 ou onivis 000 200 OOT LOO EL626 VO 0 3 1 H*3 EL626 VD 031% 13 IOSU81W 13 5292 AUM OSVd 13 ES22 3N39OW3 1 Hd3SOf NAINNUAA Aunow 3N39OW3 A Hd3SOf NAIN1\fU8A Aunosc j Him 1 NVivnr Sd131- J 3v Psnivis 000 OEO ObT LOO 112 ou isnivis 000 100 OOT LOO :ID EL696 U3 03I HO EL626 V3 0311...13 13 AOSVAIW 13 ST92 AM OSVJ 13 6692 31snoi A 3NNV I I WV1111M SM33ONV V A3113HS I A WVIJ!IM 113SNM0I. isn, AIIWVY 5M3daNO ov isnivis 000 620 051 LOO :13 ow isnivis 000 500 060 LOO :13 EL696 U3 03 1 H,':j 82626 V3 ODIHO 13 10SVEX 13 9092 Is 8 vTgT 33isn8i 31WO A31INUHa Cl` VOA A AHVW 1 8 BAWO 113H8W1:-*4 isnoi 31VG A3!iNVAe ou onivis 000 820 O LOO 113 3v isnivis 000 EOO 060 LOO :13 EL626 V3 ODIH3 AUM 0SUd 13 EfS2 f VAOQ NOiS3M 3v wnivis 000 200 060 LOO 113 EL626 03 ODIHO EL626 VV ODIH3 3AV Alod wol 5902 AVM OSVd 13 6bS2 W SI80C I GNOWAVA 153603 VNUINIAD A 3AdN3S GNU d IN33NIA NIIAVW ow onivis 000 E20 ON LOO 113 ov ssnivis 000 100 060 LOO :13. EL626 VO 03IHD 82626 VO 03IHO 3t1V WO!_ 9+7S.2 T 31ins au iwosmH OOST UW A183dOdd 113NOlH I 113NSIH 0/3 !V13 W N331103 11.38e SSW AbUd 3WOH 31ISOW 3AOH9 GNOWIV ov onivis 000 220 OfT LOO :13 ov onivis 000 990 090 LOO 173 EL6S6 V3 031H3 EL696 V3 03IH3 3AV AlOd WO1 SE22 AID GOOMNNA? E I S 10 1 a sng S3,d31139 VV13 NUAIV 3WO331 30W ov isnivis 000 9 T O ON LOO 113 ou onivis 000 010 O LOO 213 E59% WO GAVMAVH EL696 Vj 03IH-0 BES xos 0 1=1 313 GOOMNNAA 2 ivi3 9 imunis oinoo M A343f HAWS 3v anivis 000 210 SCT LOO 03 ou onivis 000 600 OGO LOO :13 v E L_: 007 140 033 S%iS%0 STATU S e AC EL: 007 140 046 !%iS'0 STATUS: AC Rl UB I NOf=r SHANE & KAREN ELAINE SMITH BETTY J TRUST E619 EI._ A I RASOL CT 627 E.L.. VARAND WA : CH I CO CA ?5973 CH I CO CA 95973 EL: 007 140 034 i%fs%0 ST•A'i US 2 AC EL: 007 7 140 04S S%>S%0 STATUS i A! LEf 1�i TRUST HAROLD HENRY G & JACQUELINE i`•I LEMA SAM & PAUL I NE TRUSTEES 2615 SEL i 1 I RA.SOL CT 600 EEL.. VARANO WAY CH I CO CA 95973 CH I CO CA 95973 EL: 007 140 036 000 STATUS: AC EL : 007 140 049 00b STATUS: AC HOWARD LAWRENCE E & B I LL I E i BLACKMAN RICHARD LEL= 2607 EL M I RASOL c-r 2594 TOM POL'K AVE CH I C'O CA '597: �. CH I CO Chi 95973 EL. 007 140 037 000 STATUS: AC EL: 007 410 004 i%iS%0 STATUS! AC SCH I LDHAUER KURT J & CYNTHIA D GREEN DONALD E { 614 CEL_ VARANO WAY 765 HARVARD AVE CH I CO CA 95973 SUNNYVALE CA 940S7 EL: 007 i 14" 038 000 STATUS: A EL: 00 7 410 i!i20 000 STATUS s r•iC: CHAMBERS CLAYTON & PATRICIA A ' LEDGERWOOD JAMES W 608 EL VARANO WAY 254 >_'I CHOL I NF= WAY CH 1C,0 CA 95973 CH:1 C0 Cry 95926 . 007 140 041 000 STATUS: AC SCOTT TIMOTHY E r 6f,.Jl EL_ VAnF',NO WAYS CH I CO CA 95973 t EL: 007 140 ry"fi.2 000 STATUS; AC OSBORN BRYAN & PHEBE L- 603 C.L.. VARAND WAY C{-i]:CO CA 95973-0688 EL: 007 140 043 S%f S%0 STATUS: AC: OSBORN :DONALD D & NANCY ._. 607 EL VARANO WAY CH I CO CA 95972 E I_. SCfr:7 140 044 r%f f%f;_ STATUS, AC 1_.AMAR ROBERT I_ >: DORIS V ETAi._. 615 EL VARANO WAY CHICO CA 95973 EL: - 007 140 045 000 STATUS: AC Cit::ii-fl..;c'.N A1'i`S F_. .... LINDA L_ Date 09/27/99 *Development Services Depa anent Time 2 :26 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 10 REZ 99-05 * Feeney Engineering 389 C Connors Court Chico, CA 95926 In reference to REZ 99-05 Rounding None Full Precision No Last bill / / Last aging Last charge 08/20/99 Last payment / / Amount $0 . 00 Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TOTAL 02/22/99 Steve B. / P 0 . 25 14 . 75 #21782 Processing 59 . 00 02/22/99 Teri B. / C 1 . 00 34 . 00 #21949 Clerical 34 . 00 03/08/99 Larry P. / P 1 . 50 88 . 50 #22127 Processing 59 . 00 03/08/99 Teri B. / C 1 . 00 34 . 00 #22238 Clerical 34 . 00 03/22/99 Steve B. / P 2 . 00 118 . 00 #22389 Processing 59 . 00 05/03/99 Lynn R. / C 0 . 50 22 . 50 #23189 Clerical 45 . 00 05/03/99 David D. / P 1 . 00 59 . 00 #23228 Processing 59 . 00 05/17/99 Lynn R. / C 2 . 50 112 . 50 #23364 Clerical 45 . 00 05/17/99 David D. / P 1 . 50 88 . 50 #23495 Processing 59 . 00 06/14/99 Lara B. / C 0 . 25. 8 . 50 #23745 Clerical 34 . 00 06/28/99 David D. / P 2 . 25 132 . 75 #24085 Processing 59 . 00 06/28/99 Lynn R. / C 3 . 00 135 . 00 #24230 Clerical 45 . 00 Date 09/27/99 •Development Services Depadment Time 2 :26 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 11 REZ 99-05 * :Feeney Engineering (continued) Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TOTAL 07/12/99 David D. / P 2 . 00 118 . 00 #24457 Processing 59 . 00 08/09/99 Teri B. / C 0 . 50 17 . 00 NO CHARGE #24997 Clerical 34 . 00 TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES 18 . 75 $966 . 00 TOTAL NO CHARGE TIME CHARGES 0 . 50 $17 . 00 TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS $0 . 00 TOTAL NEW CHARGES $966 . 00 PAYMENTS REFUNDS CREDITS 03/01/99 Deposit - Receipt #17017 (2 , 000 . 00) 08/17/99. Refund/Claim Form to Auditor 1, 034 . 00 TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS ($966 . 00) NEW BALANCE TOTAL NEW BALANCE $0 . 00 APPENDIX GI- - Environmental NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL.IMPACT 1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the project described below has been reviewed pursuant to the=prov�s,v���-,..y . . _._ Quality Act of 1970(Public Resources Code 21100,et. seq.)and a determination has been made that it will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Assessor's Parcel No. 007-410-017 2. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT:Feeney Engineering,389 C Connors Court,Chico,CA 95926 3. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD)to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD 4. LOCATION OF PROJECT: at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue,approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue,Chico 5. MITIGATION MEASURES: See Attached 6. A copy of the initial study regarding the environmental effect of this project is on file at 7 County Center Drive,Oroville. This study was: Adopted as presented. Adopted with changes. Specific modifications and supporting reasons are attached. 7. A public hearing on this Negative Declaration was held by the decision making body. Hearing Body: Butte County Board of Supervisors "Date of Determination: July 27, 1999 i Determination: On the basis of the initial study of environmental impact,the information presented at hearings,comments received on the proposal and our own knowledge and independent research: We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE i DECLARATION is hereby adopted. X We find that the project COULD have a significant effect on the environment,but will not in this case because of attached mitigation measures described in item 5 above, which are by this reference made conditions of project approval. A conditional NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby adopted. JJ DolanChair Co o r of Su ervisors ��1 1.f:� 1999 Mitigation Measures: 1. The existing solid fence on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained and maintained in good condition. The existing vegetation on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained to the maximum extent possible. Any vegetation removed from this area shall be replaced prior to start of use of the storage facility. A solid fence at least seven (7)feet tall and vegetation shall be installed along the west side of the proposed storage facility prior to start of use. The required vegetation on the south and west sides of the proposed storage facility shall provide a visual screen from adjacent t properties. All vegetation surrounding the storage facility shall be maintained in a healthy condition. 2. All outside lights installed for the storage unit use shall be fully shielded to prevent stray light and glare on adjacent parcels, and to prevent adverse impacts on aircraft flight activities. Prior to issuance of a building permit a plan showing the location, height, and type(s)of all light.fixtures shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. 3. Measures shall be taken to control fugitive dust emissions from all civil construction associated soil palliatives. Dust control measures shall be noted on any necessary improvement plans. Questions regarding fugitive dust control may be directed to the Butte County Air Quality Management District at phone number(530)891-2882. 4. No hazardous or explosive materials shall be stored in the storage unit facility. Hazardous materials are defined as any substance or material that, by reason o fits toxic, caustic, corrosive, abrasive, or otherwise.injurious properties, may be detrimental or deleterious to the health of any person handling or otherwise coming into contact with such material or substance: The property owner shall place language in the rental agreement for each storage unit stating that storage of hazardous or explosive material is prohibited. Prior to establishment of the use, a copy of the proposed rental agreement shall be submitted to an approved by the Planning Division. - 44, 4{1i 4 r iip:y,`�j d 7 + Ki aim>>.»wj' •' C/'//yS/W/ :. u to 9F L A N 0 NA liRAt wi Ai ` F PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net ! July.28,:1999 �,. i w .J' ti� 'ti' !!;1".`tai;'"y t'`c i_I�3... F t yhr_ �,} ��� RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC -OE/NOD' PUBLIC ENV. NO.- RECEIVE. WORKS LAFCOPLANNING FIRE OTHER SALES HEALTH F/G FEE APPLANT U RECEIVED DATE FROM RECEIPT 17804 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING issu D BY d o I• I I :� . , ;� .. .. Feeney Engineering 389 C Connors Court Chico, CA 95926 Re: Rezone,File REZ 99-05, APN007-410-017 Dear Mr. Feeney: At the.regular meeting of�the Butte County Board of Supervisors 27, 199.9, Ordinance No. 35.39 was'adopted to iriodffy ?UD to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood 0ak`s:PUD located at the north end of Tom Polk•Avenue, approximately,' ' 500 feet north of East Avenue, ChYco . A Notice of Determination (NOD) should be filed for purpose of completing the California environmental quality Act requirements. The fee for filing the NOD is a$25.00 document handling fee. A check made payable to the Butte County Treasure in the amount of $25.00 should be submitted to the Planning Division in order to complete the process. The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Judicial review must be sought not later than the 90th day following the date on which this decision becomes final, except that where a shorter time limit is provided by State or Federal law, such shorter time limit shall apply. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts at the Planning Division between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Xe-� Lynn Richardson P lanning/Administrative Support Services Assistant /lr Mate 08/17/99 Ovelopment Services Departlltnt Time. 2 : 09 pm Applicant -Billing Worksheet Page 1 REZ 99-05 * Feeney Engineering 389 C Connors Court Chico, CA 95926 In reference to REZ 99-05 Rounding None 'Apo /�✓�,� Full Precision No I I I Last bill / / Last aging Last charge 07/23/99 Last payment /. / Amount $0 . 00 Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TOTAL 02/22/99 Steve B. / P 0 . 25 14 . 75 #21782 Processing 59 . 00 02/22/99 Teri B. / C 1 . 00 34 . 00 #21949 Clerical 34 . 00 03/08/99 Larry P. / P 1 . 50 88 . 50 #22127 Processing 59 . 00 03/08/99 Teri B. / C 1 . 00 34 . 00 #22238 Clerical 34 . 00 03/22/99 Steve B. / P' 2 . 00 118 . 00 #22389 Processing 59 . 00. 05/03/99 Lynn R. / C 0 . 50 22 . 50 #23189 Clerical 45 . 00 05/03/99 David D. / P 1 . 00 59 . 00 #23228 Processing 59 . 00 05/17/99 Lynn R. / C 2 . 50 112 . 50 #23364 Clerical 45 . 00 05/17/99 David D. / P 1 . 50 . 88 . 50 #23495 Processing 59 . 00 06/14/99 Lara B. / C 0 . 25 8 . 50 #23745 Clerical 34 . 00 06/28/99 David D. / P 2 . 25 132 . 75 #24085 Processing 59 . 00 06/28/99 Lynn R. / C 3 . 00 135 . 00 #24230 Clerical 45 . 00 Date 08/17/99 Selopment Services Departmolt Time 2 : 09 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 2 REZ 99-05 * :Feeney Engineering (continued) Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TOTAL 07/12/99 David D. /. P 2 . 00 118 . 00 #24457 Processing 59 . 00 TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES 18 . 75 $966 . 00 TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS $0 . 00 TOTAL NEW CHARGES $966 . 00 PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 03/01/99 Deposit - Receipt #17017 (2 , 000 . 00) 08/17/99 Refund/Claim Form to Auditor 1, 034 . 00 TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS ($966 . 00) NEW BALANCE TOTAL NEW BALANCE $0 . 00 I i I 1 - i i COUNTY OF BUTTE • Oroville, California GENERAL CLAIM CLAIMANT: Feeney Engineering ADDRESS: 389 C Connors Court CITY & STATE: ' Chico, CA 95926 DATE OF CLAIM: August 13, 1999 IMPORTANT. SEE INSTRUCTIONS SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES ONREvfftsESOE DATE DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAYJ AMOUNT 8-13-99 Rezone,File No.REZ 99-05,AP007-410-017,Refund of Remaining Fees $1,034. 00 TOTAL $1,034. 00 I,the undersigned,declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been p rformed or deli eyed,and that this claim is true and correct as stated. Dated this��day of , 19w,atCalif. Jt%A I,the undersigned,hereby certify that,to the best of my knowledge,the services or articles specified above have been performed or delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriation[ ]or Specific Board Approval[ ](Check one)for the same. Dated this��' day of&4 197 ,at drya�<<<t Calif. A Department Head or Authorized De u Dept.Code Ex .Code 4120900 PAYABLE FROM GENERAL FUND DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-AUDITOR'S USE ONLY DEPT.&SUB. PROJ. SUB.OBJ. CLAIM NO. INV.NO. INV.DATE ENCUMB. GROSS AMT. s LL .::: ..s„ t„o........ Coun LAND OF NATURAL W EAITH AND BEAUTY ro DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 4 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net August 13, 1999 Feeney Engineering .389 C Connors Court Chico, CA 95926 RE: Rezone, File No. REZ 99-05 AP#007-410-017 Ladies &Gentlemen: The total cost for the processing of the above-referenced application is$966.00. Please sign,date,and return the enclosed claim form to this office. Once we receive the claim form, we will then process your refund in the amount of$1,034.00. Deposit on 3-1-99,Receipt No. 17017 $2,000.00 Professional Planner $ 531.00 Mapping $ 88.50 Clerical $346.50 Total $ 966.00 Refund Due $1,034.00 Should you have any questions,please contact Brian Larsen at 538-7601 Monday through Friday,between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, Fo re- Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services TAP:jb Enclosure ORDINANCE NO. 3539 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING REZ 99-05 FOR ROBERT AND DONNA WRAY AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE A MODIFICATION TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR THE EASTWOOD OAKS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-210 (B) OF THE BUTTE COUNTY 1 ZONING CODE 2 3 The Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, under and 4 pursuant Section 24-210 (B) of the Butte County Zoning Code , ORDAINS, as follows: 5 SECTION 1. That the modification to the Planned Unit Development 6 Zone to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the 7 Eastwood Oaks Planned Unit Development is hereby approved. 8 SECTION 2. That the use and development of said modification to the 9 Planned Unit Development Zone shall be consistent with the development plan submitted by the applicant and is herein incorporated by reference. 10 SECTION 3. That the use and development of said modification to the 11 12 Planned Unit Development Zone shall be consistent with the conditions as approved by 13 the Butte County Board of Supervisors, as follows: 14 Planning Division 15 1. The existing solid fence on the south side of the proposed storage facility 16 shall be retained and maintained in good condition. The existing 17 vegetation on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be 18 retained to the maximum extent possible. Any vegetation removed from 19 this area shall be replaced prior to start of use of the storage facility. A 20 solid fence at least seven(7) feet tall and vegetation shall be installed 21 22 along the west side of the proposed storage facility prior to start of use. 23 The required vegetation on the south and west sides of the proposed 24 storage facility shall provide a visual screen from adjacent properties. All 25 vegetation surrounding the storage facility shall be maintained in a healthy 26 condition. �I 1 2. All outside lights installed for the storage unit use shall be fully shielded 2 to prevent stray light and glare on adjacent parcels, and to prevent adverse 3 impacts on aircraft flight activities. Prior to issuance of a building permit 4 a plan showing the location, height, and type(s) of all light fixtures shall be 5 submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. 6 7 3. Measures shall be taken to control fugitive dust emissions from all civil 8 construction associated with project improvements. Measures may 9 include site watering and/or use of other acceptable'soil palliatives. Dust 10 control measures shall be noted on any necessary improvements plans. 11 Questions regarding fugitive dust control may be directed to the Butte 12 County Air Quality Management District at phone number(530) 891- 13 2882 14 4. No hazardous or explosive materials shall be stored in the storage unit 15 facility. Hazardous materials are defined as any substance or material that, 16 17 by reason of its toxic, caustic, corrosive, abrasive, or otherwise injurious 18 properties, may be detrimental or deleterious to the health of any person 19 handling or otherwise coming into contact with such material or substance. 20 The property owner shall place language in the rental agreement for each 21 storage unit stating that storage of hazardous or explosive material is 22 prohibited. Prior to establishment of the use, a copy of the proposed rental 23 agreement shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. 24 5. Use of the storage facility shall be limited to individuals living in the 25 Eastwood Oaks Planned Unit Development. 26 1 Public Works Department 2 6. Prior to the recordation of the issuance of building permits a plan for a 3 permanent solution for drainage for the storage facility shall be submitted 4 to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans 5 shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained on-site and or 6 conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or 7 8 facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow 9 runoff to said channel or facility. 10 SECTION 4. This Ordinance is hereby declared to be in full force and effect 11 thirty (30) days after the date of it's passage and before the expiration of fifteen(15) days 12 after it's passage, this Ordinance shall be published once with the names of the members 13 of the Board of Supervisors voting for and against it in the Chico Enterprise Record, a 14 newspaper published in the County of Butte, State of California. 15 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of 16 17 Butte, State of California, on the 27th day of July , 1999 by the following 18 vote: 19 AYES: Supervisors Beeler, Houx, Josiassen, Davis and Chair Dolan 20 NOES: None 21 ABSENT: None 22 ABSTAINED: None 23 24 J DOLAN, CHAIR 25 Butt County Board of Supervisors 26 �I 1 ATTEST: JOHN S. BLACKLOCK, Chief Administrative Officer and Clerk of the Board 2 3 4 lerk 5 6 K:\PROJECTS\REZ\FEENEY..REZ\ORDINAN.WPD 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 LOCATION MAP N.T.S. / A.P.N. 07-14-33 P�` o GENERAL PLAN M.D.R. bot '349.00 cl�l A.P.N. 07-14-34 \ cv ZONING: R-1 o_ GENERAL PLAN M.D.R. \ SITE Pti°F`'� P S � � 1� L \\ \ / \ A.P.N. 07-14-36 o A.P.N. : -14-35 \ / ZONING: R-1 d \� \� ZONING: R-1 GENERAL PLAN M.D.R. d GENERAL PLAN M.D.R. / \\ �l Y \ \ GRAPHIC SCALE 40 0 20 40 80 160 A.P.N. 07-14-37 \\\ / �j'J,• / /-\ /\ ZONING: R-1 Y G Y �� \ \ \` _ Y6 �S� GENERAL PLAN M.D.R. (IN Fn7 1 LEGEND A.P.N. 07-14-38 ZONING: R-1 T- TRASH BIN \ \ J \`D�(// \ �\ C \ \ O^ GENERAL PLAN M.D.R. / GARAGE O G = PATIO i\/ /�1R��L� -� �^ \ L = LIVING UNIT. ��\\ //��\ \// 1 C �\/ o / \\ Y= YARD / /\ �/ �\ \ \ U G SITY RESIDENTIAL Vv \\ / �� / M.D.R.= MEDIUM DENSITY ENSI RES EN71AL y< /% \\\ \ / \ y O\i \ \ \ \ / �^A.P.N. 07-14-39 I `V / ZONING: R-1 �✓ GENERAL PLAN M.D.R. EXISTING LIVING UNITS: 37 / ^ \\ Q \/ �\ \ \��7 / EXISTING OUTSIDE PARKING: 36 \� 1 / i� _ 8^ \ EXISTING GARAGE PARKING: 72 / \ G / / 1 \� 7 // R = 226.00 40 A.P.N. 07-14-48 / Q1 OWNER PROPOSES TO REMOVE EXISTING TENNIS ZONING: R-1 / COURT AND REPLACE WITH THE FOLLOWING \/v / R�19 �. I \ GENERAL PLAN M.D.R. / ASSESSORY'USES. TO BE USED BY TENANTS ,� 8 - STORAGE UNITS 22'X 22 'o\ \\ \ s� PQ P�Q� s�> \\\ J 18 - STORAGE UNITS 10'X 22' \ \� \\ J / ooa tip �ti s� A�\\ / 6 - RV PARKING SPACES o0; \ 0 LANDSCAPE AREA REMAINING AFTER PROPOSED � G IMPROVEMENTS IS 106,000 _+ OR 4OX OF PROJECT 4 � j 1i /A= 3022'00 \ SITE PLAN Olk ID. 11 I R 0 DF = 66.25 1'OA,S �Q� OS \ \ �•G �Q�P�V 11 I A.P.N. 07-14-49 EASTWOOD OAKS C4�a P� ZONONG. R-1 A.P.N. 07-41-017 Q?o��•�Q� S X30 \ i°��k� GENERAL PLAN L.D.R. 6.07 AC. Pi°� 0�P PROPOSED OS S S , 0 \ / OWNERS: ROBERT AND DONNA WRAY l / 289 TOM POLK CIRCLE, G� IMPROVEMENTS s55 0�4- \ 0V o� \ �� s��\sem I o = 36-1851• // CHICO, CA. \ LEGEND 5 I"1 0� p� � yfl�rn / R = 125.00 / EXIS77NG ZONING P.U.D. ORDANCE NO.2196 Q= STORAGE 22'X 22' S S �5 \ PP��0 P�Q� \ �5�y0� p�\ L = 79.23 // EXISTING GENERAL PLAN M. D. R. \ S = STORAGE 10'X 22' 9 ti�F,C� // /,a 2 V. \ RVP = RV PARKING t*'0 \ \ / / P v° 0� / pQQ 06�p�Q / •3 \ �0 / SHEET 1 OF 1 0- A.P.N. ZONING: R 05-07 \ \ / GENERAL PLAN L.D.R. \ L \ �( 389C Connors Court Chico Ca 95926 \ Voice (530)899-0409 Fax (530)899-0943 S c 1 ® r cn cn p N n W 'o r , lutecoun LAND OF NATURAL W E A L T H AND BEAUTY _ 5 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net July 28, 1999 Feeney Engineering 389 C Connors Court Chico, CA 95926 Re: Rezone, File REZ 99-05, APNO07-410-017 Dear Mr. Feeney: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors held July 27, 1999, Ordinance No. 3539 was adopted to modify a PUD to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD located at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue, Chico. A Notice of Determination (NOD) should be filed for purpose of completing the California environmental quality Act requirements. The fee for filing the NOD is a$25.00 document handling fee. A check made payable to the Butte County Treasure in the amount of$25.00 should be submitted to the Planning Division in order to complete the process. The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Judicial review must be sought not later than the 90th day following the date on which this decision becomes final, except that where a shorter time limit is provided by State or Federal law, such shorter time limit shall apply. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts at the Planning Division between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Services Assistant /lr BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA REPORT - July 27, 1999 Applicant: Robert and Donna Wray and Feeney Engineering Zone date: 03-17-81 File#: REZ 99-05 Supervisorial District: 3 Request: Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Project zone to convert a tennis court Planner: Dave Doody to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Applicable Eastwood Oaks PUD. Regulations: Butte County Code Sections 24-25.20 through 24-25.45 G.P.: Medium Density Residential (Zoning Procedures); 24-210 (PUD Zone). Zoning: PUD (Planned Unit Development) Attachments: Exhibits: APN: 007-410-017 A. Zoning/General Plan Map Location: On Tom Polk Circle, at the B. May 27, 1999, Planning north end of Tom Polk Commission Minutes Avenue, approximately 500 C. Planning Commission Agenda feet north of East Avenue, Report Chico D. Initial Study E: Site Plan Parcel Size: 6.07 SUMMARY: The Planning Commission recommends the Board of Supervisors approve this project. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: On May 27, 1999, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request and unanimously recommended approval of this project. The purpose of the rezone is to convert two tennis courts to storage units and RV parking for use by the residents of the Eastwood Oaks Planned Unit Development. Ar Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report Ar Page 1 Ar • ANALYSIS: On March 17, 1981,the Board of Supervisors approved Zoning Ordinance 2196,which zoned the subject property PA-C (Planned Area- Cluster Development) and granted a condominium project of 96 units. All PA-C zones were changed to PUD (Planned Unit Development) zones upon adoption of the current Zoning Ordinance in 1995. The Planned Unit Development zone only allows those uses that are specifically granted by the Board of Supervisors. Section 24-210(B)of the Butte County Zoning Code requires that a Planned Unit Development zone be established by adoption of an ordinance by the Board of Supervisors. Except as provided in the ordinance, no new use may be created or existing use altered unless an amendment is made to the ordinance. According to Section 24-210 (B) the Board of Supervisors may grant a modification and adopt the project site plan and conditions by reference in an ordinance. Ordinance 2196 did not state that storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks Planned Unit Development were permitted. To allow the storage units and RV parking, the applicant was required by the Zoning Code to request a zoning amendment to the Planned Unit Development zone. Storage units are permitted by the PUD Zone. Section 24-210 (K) states the following regarding storage areas within a PUD Zone: K. Storage areas: Areas used for storage of travel trailers, boats and other such items may be established in a mobile home park provided they are adequately screened from public view. The project will eliminate the"open space"of the tennis court and install a storage unit structure in its place. Section 24-210 (E)(2) requires that 25% of the residential portion of a Planned Unit Development be used for non-residential uses, and that 45% of that area be utilized for recreation or park areas. The conversion of the two existing tennis courts to storage units will result in the loss of approximately 13,400 sq. ft. of recreational area(100 ft. x 134 ft.). Based upon the size of the Eastwood Oaks property (6.07 acres), approximately 30,000 sq. ft. of recreation or park area is required. According to the applicant, there will be approximately 106,000 ± sq. ft. of landscaped/open area after development of the project. Most of the open space on the site is in the form of common areas with paved walkways. While some open space will be removed, the amount is not substantial and overall would only be an incremental decrease in the open space of the park. The proposed storage area is not fully screened. The Zoning Code requires that the storage area be screened from adjacent properties. New screening needs to be installed on the west side. This will screen the storage area from adjacent parcels which are zoned R1(Single Family Residential). Project conditions of approval require a new 7 foot tall fence and site-obscuring vegetation on the west side of the proposed storage facility. Existing fencing and vegetation on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall continue to be maintained. Use of the storage facility will be limited to the residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD, so very little additional vehicle traffic is anticipated. After construction of the storage facility, only minor amounts of noise are anticipated to be generated by the storage use. The Initial Study identified that there was a potential for hazardous and explosive materials to be stored in the storage facility. A project condition prohibits the storage of these types of materials. Iff Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report Ar Page 2 Ar ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION The Planning Commission recommends that the Board of Supervisors take the following action s: I. Approve a Negative Declaration for the project subject to the following findings: A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. There is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; and B. The Board of Supervisors has independently reviewed, analyzed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration prior to making its decision. on the project, and hereby finds that the Negative Declaration adequately represents impacts associated with this project. II. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a de minimus exemption to the collection of Department of Fish and Game Environmental Filing Fees is recommended; and III. Approve REZ 99-05 for Robert and Donna Wray and adopt an ordinance to include by reference a modification to the Eastwood Oaks Planned Unit Development pursuant to the conditions in the attached Ordinance Exhibit"A" and subject to the following findings: A. Find that the Rezone conforms to the policies, including the text and map of the Butte County General Plan and is consistent with all other General Plan Elements because the project will not substantially decrease open space within the East Oaks PUD. B. Find that the proposed use is consistent with the text and criteria of the Butte County Zoning Code and PUD zoning of the subject property because the PUD Zoning District permits.storage facilities and conditions of approval require the storage area to be screened. Ar Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report Ar Page 3 Ar EXHIBIT"A" ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING REZ 99-05 FOR ROBERT AND DONNA WRAY AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE A MODIFICATION TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR THE EASTWOOD OAKS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-210 (B) OF THE BUTTE COUNTY ZONING CODE The Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, under and pursuant Section 24-210 (B) of the Butte County Zoning Code ,ORDAINS, as follows: SECTION 1. That the modification to the Planned Unit Development Zone to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks Planned Unit Development is hereby approved. SECTION 2. That the use and development of said modification to the Planned Unit Development Zone shall be consistent with the development plan submitted by the applicant and is herein incorporated by reference. SECTION 3. That the use and development of said modification to the Planned Unit Development Zone shall be consistent with the conditions as approved by the Butte County Board of Supervisors, as follows: Planning Division 1. The existing solid fence on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained and maintained in good condition. The existing vegetation on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained to the maximum extent possible. Any vegetation removed from this area shall be replaced prior to start of use of the storage facility. A solid fence at least seven (7) feet tall and vegetation shall be installed along the west side of the proposed storage facility prior to start of use. The required vegetation on the south and west sides of the proposed storage facility shall provide a visual screen from adjacent properties. All Ar Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report Ar Page 4 Ar vegetation surrounding the storage facility shall be maintained in a healthy condition.. 2. All outside lights installed for the storage unit use shall be fully shielded to prevent stray light and glare on adjacent parcels, and to prevent adverse impacts on aircraft flight activities. Prior to issuance of a building permit a plan showing the location, height, and type(s) of all light fixtures shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. 3. Measures shall be taken to control fugitive dust emissions from all civil construction associated with project improvements. Measures may include site watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. Dust control measures shall be noted on any necessary improvements plans. Questions regarding fugitive dust control may be directed to the Butte County Air Quality Management District at phone number(530) 891-2882. 4. No hazardous or explosive materials shall be stored in the storage unit facility. Hazardous materials are defined as any substance or material that, by reason of its toxic,.caustic, corrosive, abrasive, or otherwise injurious properties, may be detrimental or deleterious to the health of any person handling or otherwise coming into contact with such material or substance. The property owner shall place language in the rental agreement for each storage unit stating that storage of hazardous or explosive material is prohibited. Prior to establishment of the use, a copy of the proposed rental agreement shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. 5. Use of the storage facility shall be limited to individuals living in the Eastwood Oaks Planned Unit Development. Public Works Department Ar Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report s Page 5 s 6. Prior to the recordation of the issuance of building permits a plan for a permanent solution for drainage for the storage facility shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained on-site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. SECTION 4. This Ordinance is hereby declared to be in full force and effect thirty(30) days after the date of it's passage and before the expiration of fifteen(15) days after it's passage, this Ordinance shall be published once with the names of the members of the Board of Supervisors voting for and against it in the Chico Enterprise Record, a newspaper published in the County of Butte, State of California. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, on the day of , 1999 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: JANE DOLAN, CHAIR Butte County Board of Supervisors ATTEST: JOHN S. BLACKLOCK, Chief Administrative Officer and Clerk of the Board By Clerk K:\PROJECTS\REZ\FEENEY.REZ\BOSI.RPT Ar Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report w Page 6 Ar EDate 07/21/99 *Development Services Depalkent Time 12 :40 pm Applicant. Billing Worksheet Page 1 REZ 99-05 Feeney Engineering 389 C Connors Court Chico, CA 95926 In reference to REZ 99-05 Rounding None Full Precision No Last bill / / Last aging Last charge 07/09/99 Last payment / / Amount $0 . 00 Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TOTAL 02/22/99 Steve B. / P 0 . 25 14 . 75 #21782 Processing 59 . 00 02/22/99 Teri B. / C 1 . 00 34 . 00 #21949 Clerical 34 . 00 03/08/99 Larry P. / P 1 . 50 88 . 50 #22127 Processing 59 . 00 03/08/99 Teri B. / C 1 . 00 34 . 00 #22238 Clerical 34 . 00 03/22/99 Steve B. / P 2 . 00 118 . 00 #22389 Processing 59 . 00 05/03/99 Lynn R. / C 0 . 50 22 . 50 #23189 Clerical 45 . 00 05/03/99 David D. / P 1 . 00 59 . 00 #23228 Processing 59 . 00 05/17/99 Lynn R. / C 2 . 50 112 . 50 #23364 Clerical 45 . 00 05/17/99 David D. / P 1 . 50' 88 . 50 #23495 Processing 59 . 00 06/14/99 Lara B. '/ C 0 . 25 8 . 50 #23745 Clerical 34 . 00 06/28/99 David D. / P 2 . 25 132 . 75 #24085 Processing 59 . 00 06/28/99 Lynn R. / C 3 . 00 135 . 00 #24230 Clerical 45 . 00 Date 07/21/99 %evelo.pment Services Depar,,ent Time 12 :40 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 2 REZ 99-05 :Feeney Engineering (continued) TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES 16 . 75 $848 . 00 TOTAL .BILLABLE COSTS $0 . 00 TOTAL NEW CHARGES $848 . 00 PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 03/01/99 Deposit - Receipt #17017 (2 , 000 . 00) TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS ($2 , 000 . 00) NEW BALANCE New Current period (1, 152 . 00) TOTAL NEW BALANCE ($1, 152 . 00) yam., BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JANE DOLAN • �� Second District,Chair aog � ADMINISTRATION CENTER R.J.BEELER °�g��• 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE-OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965 First District TELEPHONE:(916)538-7224 MARY ANNE HOUX Third District CURT JOSIASSEN Fourth District FRED C. DAVIS Fifth District July 8, 1999 Feeney Engineering 389 C Conners Court Chico, CA 95926 RE: Appeal—Rezone 99-05 Dear Mr. Feeney: This letter is to inform you that the Butte County Board of Supervisors has set the public hearing on the above-mentioned matter for July 27, 1999, at 10:15 a.m. Please note this time has been-amended since the initial notification of hearing sent to you from the Department of Development Services. Enclosed please find a copy of the public hearing notice on this matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 538-7643. Sincerely, jarion Reeves Assistant Clerk of the Board /mr enc. (1) vcc�Development Services/Planning Division Planning Division J U . 1 2 1999 orovill®,caldomia TABLE OF CONTENTS Board Agenda Report - July 27, 1999 PAGE Attachment A: Zoning/General Plan Map 1 Attachment B: Planning Commission Minutes - May 27, 1999 2 Attachment C: Planning Commissioner Agenda Report 5 Attachment D: Initial Study 12 Attachment E: Site Plan 40 BUTTE COUNTY • CLERK OF THE BOARD USE ONLY BOARD OF SUPERVIS&S MEETING DATE: AGENDA TRANSMITTAL AGENDA ITEM: AGENDATITLE: Feeney Engineering (Robert & Donna Wray) Rezone, REZ99-05 DEPARTMENT: DDS, Planning Div. DATE: -7-.97- y,9 MEETING DATE REQUESTED: 7127L99 CONTACT: Dave Doody PHONE: 7601 REGULAR X CONSENT DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Summary - See Report ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION The Planning Commission recommends that the Board of Supervisors take the following actions: I. Approve a Negative Declaration for the project subject to the following findings: A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. There is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; and B. The Board of Supervisors has independently reviewed, analyzed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration prior to making its decision on the project, and hereby finds that the Negative Declaration adequately represents impacts associated with this project. II. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a de minimus exemption to the collection of Department of Fish and Game Environmental Filing Fees is recommended; and III. Approve REZ 99-05 for Robert and Donna Wray and adopt an ordinance to include by reference a modification to the Eastwood Oaks Planned Unit Development pursuant to the conditions in the attached Ordinance Exhibit"A" and subject to the following findings: A. Find that the Rezone conforms to the policies, including the text and map of the Butte County General Plan and is consistent with all other General Plan Elements because the project will not substantially decrease open space within the East Oaks PUD. B. Find that the proposed use is consistent with the text and criteria of the Butte County Zoning Code and PUD zoning of the subject property because the PUD Zoning District permits storage facilities and conditions of approval require the storage area to be screened. AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL REQUIRES THE ORIGINAL AND NINE (9) COPIES ATTACH EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM AND OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION AS NECESSARY Budgetary Impact: Yes No CAO OFFICE USE ONLY If yes,complete Budgetary Impact Worksheet on back Budget Transfer Requested: Yes No Administrative Office Review If yes,complete Budget Transfer Request Worksheet on back. Administrative Office Staff Contact (Deadline is one business day prior to normal agenda deadline) Will Proposal Require an Agreement: Yes No 4/5's Vote Required: Yes: No: Auditor-Controller's Number(if required): County Counsel's Approval: Yes No Date Received by Clerk of Board: Will Proposal Require Additional Personnel: Yes No Number of Permanent: Temp Extra Help Previous Board Action Date: Additional Information Attached:Yes X No Describe: Packets Rev.1198 SPE I INSTRUCTIONS TO CLE Number of originals required to be returned to Department: "Please Note** Department is responsible for.returning contract to contractor. Clerk of the Board returns completed Auditor's copy ONLY. Requested Board Action: - Ordinance Required Resolution Required Minute Order Required For Information Only BUDGETARY IMPACT WORKSHEET Current Year Estimated CosUFunding Source Source of Additional Funds Requested Estimated Cost $ Contingencies $ (Fund Name: ) (Fund Number. ) Amount Budgeted $ Unanticipated Revenue $ (Budget Unit Number: ) (Source: 1 (Fund Name: ) (Rev.Code: ) (Fund Number: ) Other Transfer(s) $ 1. Complete worksheet below 2. Deadline is one business day prior to normal agenda deadline 'Additional Requested .$ Total Source of Funds $ Annualized cost$ if also planned for next year. Budget Transfer Authorized By Administrative Office » Board Action Required for B-Transfer? Yes No Authorized Signature Date BUDGET TRANSFER REQUEST WORKSHEET Transfer Request:, AMOUNT LINE ITEM LINE ITEM Transfer$ (No Cents)From To Transfer$ (No Cents)From ' To T Transfer$ (No Cents)From To t Transfer$ (No Cents)From To r _ u#0 county LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY A.r=ar, '* }4_� PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES _. 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 June 29, 1999 www.buttecounty.net Feeney Engineering 389 C Connors Court Chico, CA 95926 RE: Rezone,REZ 99-05, 007-410-017 Dear Mr. Feeney: A report of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been made to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and the hearing set for July 27, 1999, at 10:15 a.m. Pursuant to the provisions of Butte County Code Section 3-44 f, an estimated publishing fee of the rezone ordinance shall be deposited with the Planning Division prior to publishing of the Ordinance. Your rezone ordinance has been reviewed and the estimated cost of publication is $100.00. Accordingly,we request that you forward your check for$100.00, to Planning, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965. Please make the check payable to the "Butte County Treasurer." The Ordinance, if approved, can not be published until we have received your check. Should you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact Brian Larsen at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant /lr -JBUTTE COUNTY CLERK OF THE BOARD USE ONLY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING DATE: AGENDA TRANSMITTAL AGENDA ITEM: AGENDA TITLE: REPORT TO THE BOARD — Rezone Feeney Eng. — File #REZ99-05 DEPARTMENT: DDS, Planning Div. DATE: 6/11/99 MEETING DATE REQUESTED: 6/22/99 CONTACT: Dave Doody PHONE: 7601 REGULAR CONSENT % DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: SUND ARY: Pursuant to Government Code, the Planning Commission is required to make a report to the Board regarding their recommendation on all rezones. Therefore, in accordance with the Government Code, the Planning Commission held a hearing on REZ99-05, for Feeney Engineering (Robert and Donna Wray)proposing to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD). The Planning Commission is recommending approval of this project. A Board of Supervisors hearing will be held at a future date, at which time the Board will act on the Commission's recommendation. ACTION REQUESTED: Accept for information. AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL REQUIRES THE ORIGINAL AND NINE (9) COPIES ATTACH EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM AND OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION AS NECESSARY Budgetary Impact: Yes No CAO OFFICE USE ONLY If yes,complete Budgetary Impact Worksheet on back Budget Transfer Requested: Yes No Administrative Office Review If yes,complete Budget Transfer Request Worksheet on back. Administrative Office Staff Contact (Deadline is one business day prior to normal agenda deadline) Will Proposal Require an Agreement: Yes No 4/5's Vote Required: Yes: No: Auditor-Controller's Number(if required): County Counsel's Approval: Yes No Date Received by Clerk of Board: Will Proposal Require Additional Personnel: Yes No Number of Permanent: Temp Extra Help Previous Board Action Date: Additional Information Attached:Yeses_ No Describe: Rezone Report Rev.1198 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION REPORT APPLICANT: Feeney Engineering OWNER: Robert and Donna Wray FILE #: REZ 99=05 REQUEST: Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD)to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD LOCATION: at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue, Chico DATE OF APPLICATION: 2/24/99 PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS: A. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study identified potential significant environmental effects and includes mitigation measures that would mitigate such effects below significant levels; B. The Planning Commission has independently reviewed, analyzed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration prior to making its decision on the project, and recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt a Negative Declaration, reflecting the independent judgement of the County of Butte. C. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a de minimus exemption to the collection of Department of Fish and Game Environmental Filing Fees is approved. D. Find that the Rezone conforms to the policies, including the text and map of the Butte County General Plan and is consistent with all other General Plan Elements because the project will not substantially decrease open space within the East Oaks PUD. E. Find that the proposed use is consistent with the text and criteria of the Butte County Zoning Code and PUD zoning of the subject property because the PUD Zoning District permits storage facilities and conditions of approval require the storage area to be screened. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: A. Recommend to the Board of Supervisors to adopt a Negative Declaration. B. This project will not have an impact to fish and/or wildlife habitat, and fees are not required pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5. C. Recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance to include by reference a modification to the PUD zone subject to the conditions in attached Exhibit A. VOTE: 4-0 AYES: Commissioners Cage, Mooney, Lambert, and Chairman Leland NOES: No one ABSENT: Commissioner Nelson ABSTAINED: No one DATE OF LAST HEARING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION: May 27, 1999 K:\PROJECTS\REZ\FEENEY.REZ\REZREPOR.WPD EXHIBIT A Planned Unit Development Permit for Robert and Donna Wray REZ 99-05 1. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Division 1. The existing solid fence on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained and maintained in good condition. The existing vegetation on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained to the maximum extent possible. Any vegetation removed from this area shall be replaced prior to start of use of the storage facility. A solid fence at least seven(7) feet tall and vegetation shall be installed along the west side of the proposed storage facility prior to start of use. The required vegetation on the south and west sides of the proposed storage facility shall provide a visual screen from adjacent properties. All vegetation surrounding the storage facility shall be maintained in a healthy condition. (NIM) 2. All outside lights installed for the storage unit use shall be fully shielded to prevent stray light and glare on adjacent parcels, and to prevent adverse impacts on aircraft flight activities. Prior to'issuance of a building permit a plan showing the location, height, and type(s) of all light fixtures shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. (MM) 3. Measures shall be taken to control fugitive dust emissions from all civil construction associated with project improvements. Measures may include site watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. Dust control measures shall be noted on any necessary improvements plans. Questions regarding fugitive dust control may be directed to the Butte County Air Quality Management District at phone number(530) 891-2882. (MM) 4. No hazardous or explosive materials shall be stored in the storage unit facility. Hazardous materials are defined as any substance or material that, by reason of its toxic, caustic, corrosive, abrasive, or otherwise injurious properties, may be detrimental or deleterious to the health of any person handling or otherwise coming into contact with such material or substance. The property owner shall place language in the rental agreement for each storage unit stating that storage of hazardous or explosive material is prohibited. Prior to establishment of the use, a copy of the proposed rental agreement shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. (MM) 5. Use of the storage facility shall be limited to individuals living in the Eastwood Oaks Planned Unit Development. Public Works Department 6. Prior to the recordation of the issuance of building permits a plan for a permanent solution for drainage for the storage facility shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained on- Ar Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report Ar Page 5 A site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. K:\PROJtCTS\REZ\FEENEY.REZ\FEENEY.RPT Ar Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report Ar Page 6 s Count L A N D O F NATURAL W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y ,.. PLANNING DIVISION .,�.; :.�,.,;h.,�a..�;:,.,;j •`•, DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net May 28, 1999 Feeney Engineering 389 C Connors Court Chico, CA 95926 Re: Rezone, File REZ 99-05, APN 007-410-017 Dear Mr. Feeney: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held May 27, 1999, your request for rezoning to modify a Planned Unit Development for property located at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue, Chico, was recommended for approval. A report of this matter will be made to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at which time she will set the public hearing date. You will be notified of the date and time. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Services Assistant /Ir cc: Clerk of the Board k:lformsVezone.frm :go Sa ount LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY ' ? PLANNING DIVISION • DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 May 20, 1999 www.buttecounty.net Feeney Engineering 389 C Connors Court Chico, CA 95926 Re: Rezone, AP 007-410-017, REZ 99-05 Dear Mr. Feeney: Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue, Chico. Should you have -any concerns with the report or conditions of approval,please contact us in advance of the meeting so that we may work together to resolve your I concerns. A public hearing has been set for May 27, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Dave Doody of this office at 538-7601,between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. Sincerely, 4 ' Lynn Y Richardson j Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant Enc. j:\wpdocs\pcI ts\sc hedul e.mrg BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT - May 27, 1999 Applicant: Robert and Donna Wray and Feeney Engineering Parcel Size: 6.07 File#: REZ 99-05 Zone date: 03-17-81 Request: Rezone to modify a Planned Supervisor Unit Development(PUD) District: 3 zone to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV Project parking for residents of the Planner: Dave Doody Eastwood Oaks PUD. Applicable G.P.: Medium Density Residential Regulations: Butte County Code Sections 24-25.20 through 24-25.45 Zoning: PUD (Planned Unit (Zoning Procedures); 24-210 Development) (PUD Zone). APN: 007-410-017 Attachments: A: Conditions of Approval Location: On Tom Polk Circle, at the B. Vicinity Map north end of Tom Polk C: General Plan/Zoning Map Avenue, approximately 500 E: Initial Study feet north of East Avenue, F: Site Plan Chico STAFF COMMENT Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend the Board of Supervisors approve this project with conditions. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS The applicant requests approval of a rezone to modify the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning of the Eastwood Oaks PUD. The purpose of the zoning amendment is to convert two tennis courts to storage units and RV parking for use by the residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD. The existing 13,400 sq. ft. tennis court area, which contains two tennis courts, is proposed to be converted to eighteen 220 sq. ft. storage units, eight 484 sq. ft. storage units, and parking for six recreational vehicles. Use of the storage units/RV parking will be limited to the people residing in the Eastwood Oaks PUD. The storage unit structure will be 15 feet tall and will be located five feet from the property lines. The existing tennis courts are surrounded by a tall chain link fence, trees Ar Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report Ar Page 1 AF and shrubs on the north, east and south sides, and a 7 foot high wood fence on the southern side of the courts. ANALYSIS: The applicant requests modification to the Eastwood Oaks PUD zone. The original PUD zoning of the site did not provide for storage units on the site. The PUD zone only allows those uses that are specifically granted by the Board of Supervisors in the original permit. To allow the storage units, the applicant requests a zoning amendment to the PUD zone. The project site is 6.07 acres in size. The parcel was zoned PA-C (Planned Area - Cluster Development) on March 17, 1981 (Ordinance No.2196). All PA-C zones were changed to PUD zones in 1995 with the adoption of the current Zoning Ordinance. Surrounding parcels are zoned R-1 and MHP (Mobile Home Park). Surrounding land uses are single family residential and a mobile home park. The PUD zone is contained in Section 24-110 of the Butte County Zoning Code. Section 24-210 (A) states the following purpose of the PUD Zone: A. Purpo The purpose of the PUD zone is to allow diversification in the relationship of the various uses, buildings, structures, lot sizes and open spaces, to encourage and take advantage of opportunities for more integrated, flexible and superior design than is available through the application of conventional regulation and lot development. According to Section 24-210 (B) a PUD zone is established by adoption of an ordinance by the Board of Supervisors. This section specifies that the land uses and site development plan of the PUD zone are to be adopted by reference in the ordinance. Except as provided in the ordinance, no new use may be created or existing use altered unless an amendment is made to the ordinance as approved by the Board of Supervisors. Storage units are permitted by the PUD Zone.. Section 24-210 (K) states the following regarding storage areas within a PUD Zone: K. Storage areas: Areas used for storage of travel trailers, boats and other such items may be established in a mobile home park provided they are adequately screened from public view. The project will eliminate the"open space"of the tennis court and install a storage unit structure in its place. Section 24-210 (E)(2) requires that 25% of the residential portion of a Planned Unit Development be used for non-residential uses, and that 45% of that area be utilized for recreation or park areas. The conversion of the two existing tennis courts to storage units will result in the loss of approximately 13,400 sq. ft. of recreational area(100 ft. x 134 ft.). While some open space will be removed, the amount is not substantial and overall would only be an incremental decrease in the open space of the park. Approximately 2.43 acres of the Planned Unit Development will remain in open space. The proposed storage area is not fully screened. The Zoning Code requires that the storage area be screened from adjacent properties. New screening needs to be installed on the west side. This will +Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ff Page 2 Ar screen the storage area from adjacent parcels which are zoned R1(Single Family Residential). Project conditions of approval require a new 7 foot tall fence and site-obscuring vegetation be placed on the west side of the proposed storage facility. Existing fencing and vegetation on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall continued to be maintained. Use of the storage facility will be limited to the residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD, so very little additional vehicle traffic is anticipated. After construction of the storage facility, only minor amounts of noise are anticipated to be generated by the storage use. The Initial Study identified that there was a potential for hazardous and explosive materials to be stored in the storage facility. A mitigation measure prohibits the storage of these types of materials. The site is located within the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan area and is located approximately 1.7 miles from the nearest runway at the Chico Municipal Airport. The Butte County Airport Land Use Commission(ALUC)reviewed this project. ALUC determined that the project is consistent with the 1998 Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan,but recommends a condition that requires all outside lighting be fully shielded to prevent light and glare on surrounding parcels, and to prevent adverse impact to aircraft flight operations. The project site is located within the City of Chico's Sphere of Influence. Staff contacted the City and determined that the City of Chico Planning Department did not have any objections to the project. Also, the Environmental Health Division and the Butte County Fire Department/CDF did not object to this rezone nor recommend any conditions. The Public Works Department requires approval of a drainage plan that provides for no net increase in peak water runoff. Pursuant to Section 24-210 (B) a PUD zone may be modified by adoption of an ordinance by the Board of Supervisors. According to Section 24-210(B)the Board of Supervisors is allowed to adopt the project site plan and conditions by reference in an ordinance. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: I. Recommend to the Board of Supervisors to adopt a Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study identified potential significant environmental effects and includes mitigation measures that would mitigate such effects below significant levels; B. The Planning Commission has independently reviewed, analyzed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration prior to making its decision on the project, and recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt a Negative Declaration, reflecting the independent judgement of the County of Butte. Aw Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report Ar Page 3 Aw C. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a de minimus exemption to the collection of Department of Fish and Game Environmental Filing Fees is approved. II. This project will not have an impact to fish and/or wildlife habitat, and fees are not required pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5. III. Recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance to include by reference a modification to the PUD zone subject to the conditions in attached Exhibit A and subject to the following findings: A. Find that the Rezone conforms to the policies, including the text and map of the Butte County General Plan and is consistent with all other General Plan Elements because the project will not substantially decrease open space within the East Oaks PUD. B. Find that the proposed use.is consistent with the text and criteria of the Butte County Zoning Code and PUD zomng of the subject property because the PUD Zoning District permits storage facilities and conditions of approval require the storage area to be screened. i Ar Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report Page 4 EXHIBIT A Planned Unit Development Permit for Robert and Donna Wray REZ 99-05 I. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Division 1. The existing solid fence on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained and maintained in good condition. The existing vegetation on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained to the maximum extent possible. Any vegetation removed from this area shall be replaced prior to start of use of the storage facility. A solid fence at least seven(7) feet tall and vegetation shall be installed along the west side of the proposed storage facility prior to start of use. The required vegetation on the south and west sides of the proposed storage facility shall provide a visual screen from adjacent properties. All vegetation surrounding the storage facility shall be maintained in a healthy condition. (MM) 2. 1 A 1 outside lights installed for the storage unit use shall be full shielded to prevent stray g g Y Y p light and glare on adjacent parcels, and to prevent adverse impacts on aircraft flight activities. Prior to issuance of a building permit a plan showing the location, height, and type(s) of all light fixtures shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. (MM) 3. Measures shall be taken to control fugitive dust emissions from all civil construction associated with project improvements. Measures may include site watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. Dust control measures shall be noted on any necessary improvements plans. Questions regarding fugitive dust control may be directed to the Butte County Air Quality Management District at phone number(530) 891-2882. (MM) 4. No hazardous or explosive materials shall be stored in the storage unit facility. Hazardous materials are defined as any substance or material that, by reason of its toxic, caustic, corrosive, abrasive, or otherwise injurious properties,may be detrimental or deleterious to the health of any person handling or otherwise coming into contact with such material or substance. The property owner shall place language in the rental agreement for each storage unit stating that storage of hazardous or explosive material is prohibited. Prior to establishment of the use, a copy of the proposed rental agreement shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. (MM) 5. Use of the storage facility shall be limited to individuals living in the Eastwood Oaks Planned Unit Development. Public Works Department 6. Prior to the recordation of the issuance of building permits a plan for a permanent solution for drainage for the storage facility shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained on- Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report Ar Page 5 Ar site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. K:\PROJECTS\REZ\FEENEY.REZ\FEENEY.RPT Ar Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report Page 6 Vicinity Meo lok t Location REZ 99-05 APN 007-410-017 FEENEY ENG , „ . � �♦,,♦ .�.♦• ,� �,, .� '� 770 `.1''B .� ti. A e•�� I �► it`d► �!� �� � °� � '�� , �� �- Y $ FIN ,,, r"S� iY•Sy,"•r,'i:��� t ij k7a.,J -v el�\�j! ��:��{"TT , fF•` Ww .::?tik�r'h�.r.a •Ti�, �S”yl.hrY #"�,�y � 5:'.'Qp�"Y YnTi�4�4,�-' S A� :}p• ,$ {t!p fg t:c. .<<l>• <•;�`�.•.}`o-0' 'i>vc"r.::,. cC� , ; axk: s,�'y,.} -% ,,s?r,k`.`� .+•� `���k1°',> :J�;.•�,j.`.�7?P ' h,C!S�:•.:+'F;L',d �'�•• a• ��+6"` Y ?y to a ..�.F:'�:. f- Y:4\¢:ta��`�,:' S• C,� �,..'Y'}h�,l�.•:�j,:4� f�9.••P'•Fict:� �:.:�'` r�oRffi t�ti •yWd�'-`''CF. b����i•-•>l -� a4 - ,oj �£.� ris• }Cpf}hL:rt;•�: 1' .. ^r°y.� t. `S•' '$ %c• ��E`,fLm�'�•$•`s�E��'. !�j:?4i' ypt•tom°` � �vr 4 ,;• --�� �—� • •/. •l':0. }{� <Q y�.nv: ]:f'r y 7�t �`r:. _ M. C°.,\ :;Yoh/„ icfi: 5 'N-•/,.�.'a — I �°ftJyn"M$�'•-'iFI���..�,YY" ��� ' • l s • q +N? .t moi• ♦ � �• �. . ���� �♦♦ ♦jam♦ ��►.►�► ♦ sj �� � ��,�� ���Opt S:r 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet BUTTE COUNTYNG CONMUSSION SupervisorialApplicant: Feeney Engineering Owner: Robert&Donna Wray Hearing Date: May 27, 1999 @ 9:00 a.m.- Existing Zone: PUD(Planned Unit Development) N Request: •n' to modify a Planned iit Development to convert a tennis • i • storage units and D , r k i � r .. •, r, �, �. � .' i s - ,. • � , t C r 1 � e � 1 2 !^v _ (SPACE FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE In the Matter of Noticeof Public Hearin.......................... No................................................................. .................................................................................... BUTTE coub .rry,­ PLANNNO COMM' 10'nCE.OF ',Ryl PU L710 HEA011,4 .................................................................................... ' Noft 9Ni'Co Butta County �, RN nty Pl4nn@W.. mission that4:#ubill on,Thursday," I F h &I-' May.2?,�! _, , a Butte couhti;Bdd AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION th Fd�161;,S PervIsors'1-Roo'M-?C&1-­ ministration'Centdiri'11% . u C i-lls. enter Drtv6,;.OrovIII14? State of California n1a, rieg'aidinig"'the 461W­ ss. Item: o-w. County of Butte TIVE'ITEM DECLARAON WHICAjIdN`!, f V .Yr_rH MITIGATION MEASURES,�.FttJ GARDING"ENVIRONMENTAL The undersigned resident of the county of IMPACTS HAS BEENREe'0MZ Butte,State of California,says: M.ENDE6'"!--M 9:00 a.m.-JF6ihey Engfnear Ing' RNZid"ne-tc'm6d ned Un�; veydo �Dfttl That I am,and at all time herein mentioned convert a"f6hfirsl'!T, td . courti age units' and RV'1­__ wo ':Pa Ao was a citizen of the United States and not a party resldefi' ' ' �,o residents of the Eastwood to nor interested in the above entitled matter; PUD, 10cated'.at th"WwP­ Rd*, ofTo-in Polk Avenue . that I am the principal clerk of the printer and mately 500 feet north of:6` Avenue.ChJcoarba'.!APN- * I publisher of 410-017.(REZ 99-05)(� ) �­ The above mdhtl6fied'applp cation, InItIal.'StLid-1 are on file aridv`avil The Chico Enterprise-Record Public vlewlngl'hf- bl':10f the"Butte Cdunt­q!' Oroville Mercury Register. Services Depar.tjfient-��pl That said newspaper is one of general circula- Division 7 Cd­ " ad,,, un? c D rve,I Oroville,!Call omia.,, tion as defined by Section 6000 Government lnfrorrriatoncal)::(W)638� I(Mohday through'fFriday,gn(a Code of the State of California,Case No.26796 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.)' m* ­ b the Superior Court-of the State of California, tts may be submitted I 'Airl y any time prior to the' orally at. the �me'in' at' in and for the County of Butte;that said news a- above oras may I�be continued per at all times herein mentioned was printed a later date.I y6u challifide the above biopilcAil6ris in and published daily in the City of Chico and You may be IIm1ted:t6--`W0 only those issues yot,orl'some; 811 County of Butte; that the notice of which the one else raised at-the- bJI6 hearing described 16'this- u annexed is a true printed copy, was published in or in written-Correspo *n6tt delivered to the Planning nce said newspaper on the following days: I ' Com- p at or Prior to,the puti - lid hearing. ' , I BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION May 7, 1999. WTHOMAS A.PARILO DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT. SERVICES C206164 1 certify(or declare),under penalty of Publish:5/7/1999 perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct,at Chico,California. Da ted ...................Ma y..T2...1!9q9........................... at Chico,California. .................. . ........ ........................ atu (Signir Doody, Dave From: Wilson, Randy Sent: Friday, May 14, 1999 10:53 AM To: Doody, Dave Subject: PUD REZONE Dave, I received a call from Dave Finey who is the contact on East Wood Oaks which is the PUD we are revising. He indicates that he has reviewed the Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures with the owner and that there are no problems. Dave Finey's phone number is 899-0409 should you need to call him. RSW 1 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#UZ 99-05 COUNTY OF BUTTE INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS I. BACKGROUND: 1. Name of Proponent: Feeney Engineering 2. Address: 389 C Connors Court, Chico, CA Phone: (530) 899-0409 3. Name of Proposal, if applicable: 4. Type of Project: Rezone to modify an existing Planned Unit Development zone 5. Project Description and Location of Parcel(s): This application is a rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD)zone to convert two tennis courts to storage units and RV parking for use by the residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD. The project site is located on Tom Polk Circle, at the end of Tom Polk Avenue, approximately 600 feet north of East Avenue, Chico. The site is zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development) and has a General Plan land use designation of Medium Density Residential. The project site is 6.07 acres in size. The parcel was zoned PA-C (Planned Area - Cluster Development) on March 17, 1981 (Ordinance No.2196). All PA-C zones were changed to PUD zones in 1995 with the adoption of the current Zoning Ordinance. There are 37 living units in the Eastwood Oaks PUD. Access to the project site is via Tom Polk Avenue from East Avenue. The site is located within the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan area and is located approximately 1.7 miles from the nearest runway at the Chico Municipal Airport. The existing 13,400 sq. ft. tennis court area, which contains two tennis courts, is proposed to be converted to eighteen 220 sq. ft. storage units, eight 484 sq. ft. storage units, and parking for six recreational vehicles. Use of the storage units/RV parking will be limited to the people residing in the Eastwood Oaks PUD. The storage unit structure will be 15 feet tall and will be located five feet from the property lines. The existing tennis courts are surrounded by a tall chain link fence, trees and shrubs on the north, east and south sides, and a 7-foot high wood fence on the southern side of the courts. A mitigation measure requires the installation of a solid fence and vegetation on the west side of the proposed storage facility. Surrounding parcels are zoned R-1 and MHP (Mobile Home Park). Surrounding land uses are single family dwelling and a mobile home park. Highway 99 is located 250 feet to the west of the site. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 1 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Additional project description and area description can be found in the data sheet at the end of this document. 6. Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 007-410-017 7. Date Checklist Submitted: May 5, 1999 8. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): Butte County Department of Public Works H. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: 0 I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. El I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 13 I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect: 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 2 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Prepared by: Stephen Betts, Associate Planner Date Reviewed by: RanVWilson, Principal Planner For Date M. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ® Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ® Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Hazards/Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IWACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved(e.g.,the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards, (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on a project-specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off--site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction'as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effectmay be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 3 • 0• Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Si cant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Impact".to a"Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ✓ ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 4 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact - - b) Substantially damage scenic resources - including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? ✓ c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? ✓ d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ✓ Re highway.The site is not located within a State or County designated scenic highway. The project will eliminate the "open space" of the tennis court and install a storage unit structure in its place. Dwelling units are located on the south and west sides of the tennis courts. The parcel to the west has the potential for a land division which could add additional dwellings due to the R-1 zoning and the large size of this parcel. The project has the potential to create an aesthetic impact to existing and future residents on the parcels adjacent to the proposed storage facility. Vegetation consisting of trees and large shrubs.is located on the north, south, and east sides of the tennis courts. The applicant intends to keep as much of this vegetation as possible. The vegetation will help to screen the proposed storage facility from the residents on the adjacent parcels. A7- oot high wood fence is also located along the south property line which will help screen the view of the storage facility (note: this 7-foot high fence was a condition of the original rezone to PUD). In order to help screen the proposed storage facility from adjacent parcels, a mitigation measure requires that the existing fence and vegetation on the south side of the proposed storage facility be retained, and a solid fence at least seven feet tall and a vegetation barrier be installed along the west property line of the proposed storage facility. Outside lights may be placed in the storage unit area in order to allow nighttime use and for security. These lights, especially if they are unshielded, may result in a significant amount of light and glare on the adjacent residential parcels. There is also the potential that unshielded lights could impact aircraft arriving or departing the nearby Chico Municipal Airport. The Butte County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) recommends that all outside lighting associated with the project be shielded to prevent impacts to aircraft flight operations (see the discussion in Item 15 regarding impacts to aircraft). A mitigation ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 5 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact .measure requires that all outside lights for the storage unit use be fully shielded to prevent stray light and glare on adjacent parcels, and to prevent adverse impacts to aircraft flight operations. Mitigation Measure # 1: The existing solid fence on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained and maintained in good condition. The existing vegetation on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained to the maximum extent possible. Any vegetation removed from this area shall be replaced prior to start of use of the storage facility. A solid fence at least seven (7) feet tall and vegetation shall be installed along the west side of the proposed storage facility prior to start of use. The required vegetation on the south and west sides of the proposed storage facility shall provide a visual screen from adjacent properties. All vegetation surrounding the storage facility shall be maintained in a healthy condition. Mitigation Measure#2: All outside lights installed for the storage unit use shall be fully shielded to prevent stray light and glare on adjacent parcels, and to prevent adverse impacts on aircraft flight activities. Prior to issuance of a building permit a plan showing the location, height, and type(s) of all light fixtures shall be submitted to and . approved by the Planning Division. 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? ✓ b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? ✓ ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 6 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland, to non-agricultural use? ✓ Response: The project site is currently not under any type of agricultural production and is not encumbered by a Williamson Act contract. The project will not have an impact on agricultural operations nor convert farmland to non-agricultural uses. Mitigation Measure: None required. 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ✓ b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? ✓ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? ✓ d)Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? ✓ e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? ✓ Response: The proposed storage unit use will not generate any fumes or odors. While the project site has already been graded level, additional grading and/or soil excavation may ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 7 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less PotentiallyVit], Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact be necessary during the construction of the storage facility. Construction activities may generate significant amounts of fugitive dust, which has the potential to cause an impact to on and off-site residents. The Butte County Air Quality Management District recommends that the applicable Standard Mitigation Measures found in the District's Indirect Source Review Guidelines be incorporated into the project. A mitigation measure requires that measures be taken to control fugitive dust emissions from all civil construction associated with project improvements. Mitigation Measure # 3: Measures shall be taken to control fugitive dust emissions from all civil construction associated with project improvements. Measures may include site watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. Dust control measures shall be noted on any necessary improvements plans. Questions regarding fugitive dust control may be directed to the Butte County Air Quality Management District at phone number(530) 891-2882. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a)Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ✓ b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? ✓ c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? ✓ ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 8 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Siccant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact -d) Interfere substantially with the _ movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? ✓ e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy ordinance. ✓ f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? ✓ Response: All the native vegetation where the storage units will be located was removed when the tennis courts were installed. Non-native trees and bushes are located around the tennis courts, some of which may be removed for the storage unit use. No rare or endangered animal species are found on the project site (Butte County Master Environmental Assessment). The project site does not contain any wetland habitat. This project will not have an impact to fish and/or wildlife or.their habitat. The payment of fees under Public Resources Code Section 21089 and as defined by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 is not required. Mitigation Measure: None required. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? ✓ ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 9 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? ✓ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? ✓ d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ✓ Response: The project site is located in a general area characterized as having a low to medium archeological sensitivity (Butte County Archaeological Sensitivity Map). An archaeological survey was conducted on the site for the original rezone to PA-C, but no historic or prehistoric cultural material were found. The location of the proposed storage facility was already graded for the existing tennis courts. Very little or no grading and soil disturbance will be necessary for the construction of the storage units. The project is not anticipated to uncover any historic or prehistoric resources. Mitigation Measure: None required. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a)Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: ✓ 1) Rupture of a known earth- quake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other sub- stantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ✓ ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 10 r 0 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact - 2) Strong seismic ground Shaking? ✓ 3) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? ✓ 4) Landslides? ✓ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ✓ c)Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? ✓ d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(1994), creating sub- stantial risks to life or property? ✓ e)Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal or waste water? ✓ Response: All of Butte County is in a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. No earthquake faults are known to exist near the project site (Butte County Seismic Safety Element Map and GIS coverage). Construction of the storage units to Uniform Building Code seismic standards is required to address seismic activity. The soils on the site are considered to have a low erosion potential (Butte County Soils Constraints Map). The area where the storage units will be located has already been graded and little or no soil disturbance is anticipated due to this project. The project is not anticipated to cause an increase in erosion. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ " 11 • Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The soils in the project area are considered to have a low expansive potential. The'soils are also considered to have no landslide potential(Butte County Soils Constraints Map). The storage unit use does not require a sewage disposal system. Mitigation Measure: None required. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport use, or disposal of hazardous materials? ✓ b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? ✓ c)Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools? ✓ d)Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? ✓ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? ✓ ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 12 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant .Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? ✓ g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ✓ h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? ✓ Response: The site is not identified as a hazardous materials site. Generally, a storage unit facility does not involve the handling or storage of hazardous or explosive materials, but the potential exists that a renter may store some type of material that may be hazardous, such as large quantities of gasoline,pesticides, or chemical cleaners. Storage of hazardous or explosive materials on the site could result in a significant health impact to users of the site and nearby residents. A mitigation measure prohibits the storage of hazardous and explosive materials on the site. The project site is located approximately 1.7 miles from the nearest runway at the Chico Municipal Airport, and is within the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan area. The project is not anticipated to expose people to any hazards resulting from being located near the Chico Municipal Airport. Mitigation Measure # 3: No hazardous or explosive materials shall be stored in the storage unit facility. Hazardous materials are defined as any substance or material that, by reason of its toxic, caustic, corrosive, abrasive, or otherwise injurious properties, may be detrimental or deleterious to the health of any person handling or otherwise coming into contact with such material or substance. The property owner shall place language in the rental agreement for each storage unit stating that storage of hazardous or explosive material is prohibited. Prior to establishment of the use, a copy of the proposed rental agreement shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 13 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? ✓ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? ✓ c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? ✓ d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? ✓ e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? ✓ f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ✓ ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 14 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? ✓ h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? ✓ i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or, dam? - ✓ j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ✓ Response: The storage unit use is not anticipated to increase-the amount of impervious surfaces on the site because the existing tennis courts, where the storage units will be located, already form an impervious surface. Because there will not be an increase in impervious surfaces, no increase in peak surface water runoff is anticipated. The Public Works Department states that any increase in peak runoff caused by the change in use must be kept at or below pre project levels. A condition of the project requires that there be no net increase in the peak runoff from the site due to the conversion of the tennis courts to a storage unit use. The storage units will not deplete groundwater supplies because a source of water is not required. No significant soil erosion.impacts are anticipated due to this project because the area where the storage units will be located has already been cleared of vegetation and graded and very little or no additional grading or soil disturbance will be required. The project site is not located within a 100 year flood zone as shown on the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map for the project area (0600 7C- 0575Q. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 15 I Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ✓ b) Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? ✓ c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? ✓ Response: The storage unit use was not proposed at the time of the Eastwood Oaks Planned Unit Development approval. Any change to this PUD requires a modification, which is in the form of a rezone. The proposed storage unit use is considered to be an accessory use in a large apartment complex. The project will be compatible with the existing land uses on the project site and in the vicinity. The operating characteristics of the storage unit use are such that it will not create sign ficant vehicle traffic in the project area nor will it create significant levels of noise or light. . Only the residents of the Eastwood Oaks Planned Unit Development will use the storage units. Mitigation Measure # I in Item 1 requires that the existing vegetation and fencing on the south side of the site remain, and that a solid fence and vegetation be installed and maintained on the west side of the proposed storage facility. Mitigation Measure # 2 in Item 1 requires that all outside lighting associated with the project be shielded and directed to prevent adverse impacts on adjacent parcels and to aircraft flight activities. The fencing, vegetation, and excess light prevention will help make the project more compatible with the residential uses on the adjacent parcels by screening the new structures on the site and preventing lighting impacts. The project site is within the City of Chico's Sphere of Influence. The City of Chico responded with "no comment" to a request for comments regarding this project. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 16 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Si cant Less Potentially 'With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The site was originally zoned PA-C (Planned Area- Cluster) and at that time the Zoning Ordinance did not require any portion of the site to be reserved for open space or recreational purposes. No conditions of the rezone to PA-C required open space. Section 24-210.E.2 of the present Butte County Code requires that 25%of the residential portion of a Planned Unit Development be used for non-residential uses, and that 45%of that area be utilized for recreation or park areas. The conversion of the two existing tennis courts to storage units will result in the loss of approximately 13,400 sq.ft of recreational area(100 ft. x 134 ft.). Based upon the size of the Eastwood Oaks property (6.07 acres), approximately 30,000 sq. ft of recreation or park area is required. According to the applicant, there will be approximately 106,000 ± sq. ft of landscaped/open area after development of the project. Most of the open space on the site is in the form of common areas with paved walkways. The proposed storage structure will be placed five (5)feet from the property lines. The PA-C zone required a 10 foot building setback when abutting a residential zone. There are no conditions in the original rezone to PA-C that state a 10 foot building setback is required. The current Zoning Ordinance does not specify any building setbacks in the PUD zone. A 5-foot building setback appears to be adequate based on the required building setbacks for the R-1 through R-4 zones. Mitigation Measure: None required. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents or the state? ✓ b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? ✓ Response: The project site is not believed to contain any significant mineral resources. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 17 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 11.- NOISE. Would the project result in: - a)Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? ✓ b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels: ✓ c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ✓ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ✓ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ✓ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ✓ Re once: Ambient noise on the site and in the project area is affected primarily by vehicle traffic on Highway 99, which is located 250 feet to the west of the site. Installation of the storage facility may temporarily generate high noise levels on and adjacent to the project site duringproject development activities. The noise associated with the installation of the ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 18 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Uss Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact storage facility is not anticipated to have a significant impact on nearby residents because _ the noise will be intermittent and short-term in nature. Noise generated by the storage unit use will be in the form of vehicle noise from the vehicles entering or exiting the storage facility and the vehicle noise from recreational vehicles being moved on or off the site. Additional noise will be generated by people loading or unloading their vehicles and the opening and closing of car doors and storage unit doors. This is not anticipated to be significant because of the small number of recreational vehicles that can be stored on the site and because of the intermittent use of storage units. The project is located within the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan, and the Chico Municipal Airport is located approximately 1.7 miles to the north of the site. Arriving or departing aircraft may temporarily create relativity high noise levels, but this will not have a significant impact to persons using the storage facility due to the short term nature of this noise. The project will not expose people to severe noise levels because no significant noise generators are near the project site. Mitigation Measure: None required. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure? ✓ b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ✓ c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ✓ ResRonse: The project will not induce any population growth in the area because no new dwellings or infrastructure, such as sewer or water lines, will be constructed. No ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 19 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact -displacement of the existing dwelling or people living on the site will occur as a result of this project. Mitigation Measure: None required. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services? ✓ b) Fire protection? ✓ c) Police Protection? ✓ d) Schools? ✓ e) Parks? ✓ e) Other public services? ✓ Re once: The proposed storage unit use will not normally require,fire department services. The Butte County Fire DeparimentlCDF did not object to the project and did not recommend any conditions for project approval. The proposal will not cause an increase in demand for police protection services or school facilities. The project will not result in an increase in demand for park facilities in the area. The proposal will not result in an increase in the need for maintenance of roads in the project area. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 20 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 14.'RECREATION. a)Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? ✓ b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ✓ Response: The project will convert two existing tennis courts into storage units. According to the applicant, the tennis courts were rarely used and were not being maintained because of the low usage. The loss of the tennis courts may result in a very minor increase in the use of other tennis court facilities in the area, but this is not anticipated to have a significant impact. Mitigation Measure: None required. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system(i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? ✓ b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency 1 for designated roads or highways? ✓ i ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 21 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less Potentially 'With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? i ✓ d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ✓ e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ✓ f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ✓ g) Conflict with accepted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ✓ Response: The proposed storage unit use is anticipated togenerate very few new vehicle trips in the project area because use of the storage units will be restricted to residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD. The only additional traffic that the project will generate is that of recreational vehicles coming or going. This is not anticipated to be significant because there will only be six recreational vehicle storage spots. The project will reduce the need for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD to drive to off-site mini-storage businesses. Three existing parking spaces will be removed to provide access to the storage units. The site contains garage parking for 72 vehicles and 36 additional parking spaces,for a total of 108 parking spaces. At the time the site was zoned PA-C, only two parking spaces per dwelling were required. The PUD Zoning Ordinance now requires one parking space per bedroom,plus additional parking spaces equal to 20%of the number of dwelling units on the site. Using this formula, 87 parking spaces are required(79 bedrooms + 8 additional spaces). After construction of the project, there will be 105 parking spaces, a number that exceeds the minimum parking requirements of the Butte County Zoning Ordinance. The project site is located approximately 1.7 miles from the Chico Municipal Airport and is within the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan area. The Butte County Airport Land Use Commission (AL UC) held a public hearing on this project at their regular meeting on ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 22 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less Potentially Vith Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact .... April 21, 1999, and determined that the project is consistent with the 1998 Chico.Municipal. .. Airport Environs Plan. ALUC recommends that all outside lighting of the storage unit facility be directed within the project site and shielded to prevent adverse impacts on adjacent properties and aircraft flight activities. Mitigation measure # 1,found in Item 1 of this document, requires that all outside lighting be fully shielded to prevent impacts to adjacent parcels and to aircraft flight activities. The proposal will not affect air traffic because the storage units will not extend into any protected airspace. The project will not cause an increase in air traffic levels. Mitigation Measure: None required. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a)Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? ✓ b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? ✓ c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? ✓ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? ✓ e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 23 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 Less Than Significant Less .Potentially will, Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact -adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? ✓ f) Be served by a landfill with 'sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? ✓ g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? ✓ Response: The proposed storage unit use does not require a domestic water supply or a sewage disposal system. The project will not have an impact to any wastewater or sewage treatment facilities. The project will not cause an increase in the amount of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill. Mitigation Measure: None required. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce. the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ✓ ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 24 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively consider- able" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? ✓ c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ✓ Response: As discussed in Section 4 of this document,Subsections 1 and 7,this project has the potential to create an aesthetic impact to nearby residents and could cause light and glare which could significantly impact adjacent properties or overflying aircraft, and has the potential to harm humans through the storage of hazardous or explosive materials, but these potential impacts cans be mitigated to a level of insignificance by the incorporation of mitigation measures 1, 2, and 3 as part of the project approval. V. MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: 1. The existing solid fence on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained and maintained in good condition. The existing vegetation on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained to the maximum extent possible. Any vegetation removed from this area shall be replaced prior to start of use of the storage facility. A solid fence at least seven(7) feet tall and vegetation shall be installed along the west side of the proposed storage facility prior to start of use. The required vegetation on the south and west sides of the proposed storage facility shall provide a visual screen from adjacent properties. All vegetation surrounding the storage facility shall be maintained in a healthy condition. 2. All outside lights installed for the storage unit use shall be fully shielded to prevent stray light and glare on adjacent parcels, and to prevent adverse impacts on aircraft flight activities. Prior to issuance of a building permit a plan showing the location, height, and type(s) of all light fixtures shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. 3. Measures shall be taken to control fugitive dust emissions from all civil construction associated with project improvements. Measures may include site watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. Dust control measures shall be noted on any necessary improvements plans. Questions regarding fugitive dust control may be directed to the Butte County Air Quality Management District at phone number(530) 891-2882. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 25 • Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 4. No hazardous or explosive materials shall be stored in the storage unit facility. Hazardous .materials are defined as any substance or material that, by reason of its toxic, caustic, corrosive, abrasive, or otherwise injurious properties, may be detrimental or deleterious to the health of any person handling or otherwise coming into contact with such material or ,_substance. The property owner shall place language in the rental agreement for each-storage unit stating that storage of hazardous or explosive material is prohibited. -Prior to establishment of the use, a copy of the proposed rental agreement shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. DATA SHEET A. Project Description 1. Type of Project: Rezone to modify an existing Planned Unit Development zone to allow storage units for people living on the site. 2. Proposed Density of Development: N/A. 3. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Very little or no new impervious surfaces. 4. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Tom Polk Avenue. 5. Method of Sewage Disposal: Not required for proposed use. 6. Source of Water Supply: Not required for proposed use. 7. Proximity of Power Lines: To property. 8. Potential for further land divisions and development: None under current PUD zoning. B. Environmental Setting 1. Terrain a General Topographic Character: Level valley floor. b. Slopes: 0%. C. Elevation: 205 feet above sea level. d. Limiting Factors: None. 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics: Vina Fine Sandy Loam - Surface soil 2 to 3 feet thick, loose and friable, retains moisture well. b. Limiting Factors: None. 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. b. Erosion Potential: Low. C. Landslide Potential: None. d. Fire Hazard: Unclassified -urban area. e. Expansive Soil Potential: Low. 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water: None. b. Ground Water: Unknown, potentially limited. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 26 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 C. Drainage Characteristics: Property drains generally to the north and south. d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 35 to 40 inches per year. e. Limiting Factors: None. 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good. ---....6. Acoustic Quality: Fair- vehicle noise from nearby Highway 99. - - - 7. Air Quality: Good, except when stagnant air conditions persist in the valley. 8. Vegetation: Non-native trees and bushes. 9. Wildlife Habitat: Small birds and animals common valley urban areas. 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Low archaeological sensitivity area. 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Medium Density Residential. 12. Existing Zoning: PUD (Planned Unit Development) 13. Existing Land Use on-site: Apartment-Condominium complex - 37 apartments, garages, open spaces, swimming pool, tennis court. 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: Urban residential, mobile home park. b. Zoning: MHP, R-1, R-3, U, H-C, C-C. C. Gen. Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential. d. Parcel Sizes: .25 to 20 acres. 15. Character of Site and Area: Urban residential, mobile home park. 16. Nearest Urban Area: City of Chico 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: Chico. 18. Improvement Standards Urban Area: Chico. 19. Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest County(State)Fire Station: Station 42, approximately 1.4 miles to the north on Cohasset Road. b. Water Availability: On-site fire hydrants 20. Schools: Chico Unified School District. ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Actb*Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: C112M Hill, 1977. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1, Safety Element. Oroville, CA CH2M Hill, 1977. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 27 Project:Feeney Engineering,File#REZ 99-05 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4, Safety Element. 0roville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. -- Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Mai Oroville, CA: James - P. Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Man. Oroville, CA. 11. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 12. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1998. 13. USGS Quad Maps. 14. Soil Map, Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 15. Soil Survey of Chico(1925)/Oroville(1926)Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 16. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Man. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. K:\PROJECTS\REZ\FEENEY.REZ\FEENEY.IS a Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 28 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing on, Thursday,May 27, 1999, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors'Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California,regarding the following item: ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MITIGATION MEASURES REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED 9:00 a.m. - Feeney Engineering - Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD, located at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue. Chico area. APN 007-410-017. (REZ 99-05) (SB) The above mentioned application,Initial Study, and map are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Development Services Department, Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. For information call: (530) 538-7601 (Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) Comments may be submitted in writing at any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION THOMAS A. PARILO,DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Friday, May 7, 1999. :� utte � LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH . AND BEAUTY .�•�+`^ 4iyya '1:y 3.t. �t PLANNING DIVISION .— .•s,.`y�• � ''t DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 May 7, 1999 Feeney Engineering Attn: Robert Feeney 389 C Connors Court Chico, CA 95926 Re: Modification to a PUD zone(Eastwood Oaks PUD)for Feeney Engineering on APN 007-410-017, File# REZ 99-05 Dear W. Feeney: The Butte County Planning Division has completed the initial study of potential environmental consequences anticipated in connection with the above-mentioned project, a copy of which is enclosed. Please review the enclosed checklist, noting particularly any environmental problems which could be minimized or avoided by the care and manner in which the project is carried out. Also,please review the recommended mitigation measures and contact me as soon as possible. regarding your approval or disapproval of the mitigation measures. After reviewing the checklist,you may see ways to improve the project design. Design improvements to minimize problems are encouraged Ifyou note any errors or omissions in our evaluation,please bring them to our attention. This project has been scheduled for a public hearing before the Butte County Planning Commission on May 27, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors room at 25 County Center Drive, Oroville. You will receive additional notification of this hearing early next week. Should you have any further questions concerning this environmental review, please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.in. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, c57� t ac Stephen Betts Associate Planner Enc. l z-J Q�rl dHW dHW r� � t � � = � f � � �, �` aaw �� ; ORDINANCE NO. 2196 AN ORDINANCE ZONING A PORTION OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, ;STATE OF CALIFORNIA, A "PA-C" (PLANNED AREA-CLUSTER) DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTcR 24-29 The/ Board of Superviosrs of the County of Butte, State of 2 under and California, pursuant to Chapter 24-29 of the Butte County 3 Code of said County DO ORDAIN as follows: 4 71 SECTION 1. The hereinafter described area situated in the 5 County of Butte, State of California, shall be and it is hereby S. zoned as a "PA-C" (Planned Area Cluster) District, and such area 7 shall be subject to the restriction,!, restricted uses and regulations 8 pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-126. 9 Said area so zoned being located in the imincorporatee lO area of Butte County, Chice, more particularly described as follows:) 11 All that certain real property situate in the County of Butte, State of California, described as follows: • 12 � s Being a portion of Lot 1 of the Burson Tract, a ' 13 ,portion of Lot 1 of the Hobart Subdivision, and a portion of projected Section 15, T22N, R1E, MDB&M, 14 ;more particularly described as follows: �* 16Parcel one as shown on that certain Parcel Map filed <�in the office of the Recorder of the County of Butte, 1g State of California, on April 3, 1978, in Book 65 of Parcel Maps, at page 60. 17 Excepting therefrom that portion deeded to the Count, 18 of Butte, August 8, 1979, in Book 2311, of Official. Records, at page 206. 19 ls' Containing 14.816 acres, more or less, Chico. 20 21 SECTION 2: The use and development of said property shall j; '22 be in accord with the development plan submitted by the applicant, 23 as conditioned and incorporated herein .by reference. Said cor.dition- kk ttiw i y PA >'24 ed development pian collectively consists of the following documents: x.25 (a)-Development Plan (showing the location of buildings, '':i;�' ,..•..' : „fit';: ••- ,20 streets, parking, recreation facilities and other major features wl� 'WyJI:��' i �11�i...^ :'�•. y���;X�.'• ��~ a. �•i fl i ' e T075 Til „ 1 00 ;1ti ti :� .. 1 of the project); 2 (b) Septic tank and leach line layout and waterline - fir 3 hydrant location plan. 6 (c) -Storm drain and road template plan. bY '3 5 (d) Landscape plan. .- 8 SECTION S: Notwithstandi-, the provisions of Chapter 24- '' 7 126 of the Butte Count Code the following r' County g provisions shall govern t•, 8 the use and development of said property: 9 (a) The dwellings as shown on the development plan shall +• 10 be limited to residential uses and activities; and ^: 11 (b) •The recreation building and facilities as shown on the ; 12 development plan shall be limited to recreation, social, maintenance X.1i y. ' # 13 and administrative uses and activities associated with the develop- 1e, ment, exclusively; and 13 (c) The storage of materials and objects around the i le residential dwellings and recreational facilities as shown on the ` 17 evelopment"plan shall be limited to those which are necessary to, 18 appurtenant to and customarily associated with the residential and ; 19 recreational use of the development; and 20 (d) The height of all principal structures as shown on , 21 the development plan shall not exceed a height of two (2) stories or S feet; and 4 .Y , , , . • .23 (e), The keeping of livestock including horses 'snd the 24 e';alopment 'of stables shall be prohibited; and �+ 23 (f) Signs shall.be limited to an identification of the 28 Jiveiopment not ,to;.exceed two (2) in number with a maximum size o£ ' � {t �' .tN ;� 5.�. 'w;:i, ti .2�� �yµ��,�Yw{!,,��'•,,�W.I�-���rr'�GV� y e T. .kttfd:7+ R ����+17�!�1tl�'ir"tiNvk/.�".,,:ti�i � r•1 Y OP M ,a P v - ,v o A °qaw o n• Q�„8.n° ,D a �.”ua Q p Dv p v a _ ;,,{LOQ.. o O ° vO �. a + c e�8 u Q, Qa° n` 4 p 0 'D, vg " 'g e ao 0 v °v° °v ° ❑�4 ° p °. p p° ° � 0(*°o0 °A ° ° p 'o t] ° ip _ °° ❑v P. Pf '90 e�e S ° �°l7 v 8�v ` ' iT BoCP9 = r P 0��_ 0�, �_,:vq r �r .: aPa °. il" o a'!T 1►' {.'�hr ri"•�• ...;.-vim*ti4 .-r.•v ;^waw -v�V••--- .s. .,j '"L.�, ' iy"'» .i r q 8 {` p 8p �y ❑-�• `,p{ 4 �Q4Wr a� il� ,:•��,+f� t'fr.h �: �, o':p.�a� �„J ° 00 Gap ° � .�' r�� .' • ; n F A• ^ Q .0 ,,� Y, ��„ p p�.' Q ° b° a �° ° !O 9. v q' 00-, G r _ '� �/� ay U' � _ __ � ,•, �Ou❑o.:� p ao °n.., ��'3 QD ❑,P h 8 a7 1 SO square feet each;,'except that signs advertising the development•, Q cJ 6 ❑ 4 I 2 and sale and/or rental of units may be permitted until 85 percent,” ° o ° 3 of the dwellings are sold and/or rented or until a period of five ° p a Do ° °� p a 4 (S) years has elapsed which ever is first. The developer shall be ° °v m l�6 responsible for the removal of all signs associated with the sale i 9°., �ro o .y e •nd/or rental of said property. °p•� �� J 9 ° p p � V'a ❑ . SECTION 4:; .-In the event the residential units are offered ° . w .. ❑ 'z Q., q x"8 for sale, the 'developerzshall establish a homeowners association to ti o °m ❑ 9 e responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the utilities, --. V a ° •'� � Geo° '©.°"P m l0 roads, and all other property owned in common. The developer shall 11 assume responsibility for theunsold, remaining memberships until °a d ° op �. 2 r. M d ° v a o �F 12 such time as the'homeowners association can reasonably assume thea o ° °°s ° 13 financial responsibilities for the maintenance and upkeep of the 8p . o 14 tilities, roads and all other real property owned in common. To v�"a°a8 '' °. "°❑ ° ° o .15 ensure, that the .homeowners association is adequately formed to. meet 16 these responsibilities, the developer shall submit copies of said q ° °' a . a p the Butte County Planning Depart o°O Ov ❑ t 17 homeowners association agreement to pod n° ° ° ° ° ,a 18 ment for review and approval prior to the recordation of any sub- p 19 sequent map authorizing the sale of any real property in conjunction 16 y• °° ©g 20 with this development. 21 SECTION 5: This Ordinance shall be and it is hereby p 22 declared to be in full force and effect from and after thirty. (30) u . �o 0 4 d$ °g, 'a n , 23 days after the date of its passage, and before the expiration of u° ❑ •.° b ° o 24 fifteen. (1 15) days after its passage, this Ordinance shall be d Q ° o ° 4+ •,25 published once with the names of the members of the Board of `� N m 26 Supervisors voting,:pr and against' it in the r.hico Enterprise, a 00 p, ':J,' : u' c. v4. 3. , .� _3Al : . ' ,, i, t..• L.. ''• �f •^ ° .,.f °', .:..si....... :.-.,..:nwu,e... ...r.:rtu.r...e^. ..L. °o A, �vd q 9° d p v c n ° O a '. . Q1 : p,. o .+a Q n ,.�4 ❑-n �' � 'A ' 749 p �,,t..�.tC dc�, r i� •ty -�i� .!� � j, c: �' <- �' ,. � op U � ° o k ❑ d ofl o W 1Yr ,.P u A❑ ° 9 d Yi, f' Y F _ O ;p R R of Y °by� :"3 1s ° a Y�"p a ° ° ° .a, tiff o00 � �;" d"{ i4•^ it �'2,*I° K' ,a.' r'll: y ,� ° °.�'v n o �, m o 0. ❑ p °p .,�' } v $ � "-j�d, J K�^b.Se•°`4 n' ry-a �°•� vAvD a L ° 42 0 v - :� ` .. ° 4.0° � � �.-. v .•f f� .p- Q ._+ ,.. ❑ ° .° p°qk v o a dye Go 4 ° o p° °� rd°' r 0❑ v,q4 G ° .�Q y v Y'° AI° ❑ ° °_ .'�4 •0 v .V Qa43 nu.t+-.�1Ac.a�,r.��dKaRo...,��. a �°a (,,,� - .iC v $A.,..�¢. _ a q°`�. '•�+t!nz+'i 95 IV, 93 I Lt' Z'' TZ OZ '- 61 ' TT pteog a [a ;o XaoTO oTDT33o-x3`PUT sopa000g-Kxolo AaunoO 'NOST N 'b MIO :IS3d.3.d WE Tt , �f 1 st sTetadnS o pteog AzunoO ozzng 'usuulagO OT r� g `r OWN :9NIZOA ION 8 t t�ma►I totzastdng ':,Lt13SfiV L its solosgft aos wstdnS :S30N 0 F` 4sjosog atmaTt:o put Tutatatg 'utToa taotfw adag :S3.tV g 1 ' :oaon SUIMOITo; ogz Aq 1186T f ` quthl ;o Cap 4s[T043 uo 'sTuao;TT$O 30 oae:g 'oazng ;o �(3unoO Z ogz ;o saosTetodnS ;o pavog ogz Aq a3,LdOQY QNV Q3ssyd 8 •iTuto;TL4O ;o oz*zS 'oaang 3o AzunoO ogz UT PogsTTgnd aodadsMou t « �•,� 11 A • •Y:oSayi� .Air `s+ ` 00Y, 1 a r�.��►��; .+� • . ,, .! `.1�'IY6t2 yLt'�i?�'��f'I•�;�SBLANYiC D$ "'dp GYYOt: •umn;TaTs pemesp •Opoo4iogq$Tvu T*T3uspTrea LTTas;-*TluTs 3asosrps .•; 43Tft n T3TTzgT3sdmo3uj tuTonpsa &gsasg3 'sxotg39s ' IuTPTTnq as3ssal pus *3sds Ueda saom ao; psftoTlw oris uoT3onpsa sf41 -uvld Tsasuvy azTgD ;o 4313 p3 uT ossa• TsT3uspTssa LTTsn;-slluTs aoi psi;Taeds sass asd s3Tan 9 •43 o3 esoT3 rT 4374ft S'9 o3 A3Te=p 33sfoad TTsatno 643 3gSnoaq s3TUn 96 o3 ICT moa; L3Tsusp sq3' ptonpea goTgn slusgo u3Tssp sqy •sen TrT3uspT n a LTTms;' -610.11nm sTg3 moa; as�osxsgo eon puri seas p6113TV ';u*mdojsn/p Jo AIJIU*191 par A41susp Ven pusj pN/NMj •t •uoT3ngTa3sTp ooT3tTndod 3uspn3r sg3 szTTsnbe o3 ps3;Tqs eq aro sopipunoq ' PUT '33Ta3sTa 70093S Las3U*=T3 o3T%D sq3 UTg3TA *4e4AOBTO e3sjxs L3T3sdso loog3s s3uTo •3us3T;TU3Ts psmssp Sou sT 33wdmT rTU •(Toog3S *SpTa3asd Lwr) well i Ts3oT sq3 UT ssT3TTT3s; Toog3s Las3u*=Te 3TTgnd , UO LTTsT3sdn 'spurmep s3Tna*s oTTgnd p*swsaoul, •C f •*aogw •T —37 uT• F4 psUTT3no saor»a sg3 ao; 3Us3T;TUSTs pemssp 3oU WT 33sdmT sTgl •spawssq 3T;;ra3 pss»a3ul T*T3us3od •Z •3Us3T;Tu2Ts p*msep Sou 1 r; tae s33sdmi 3T;;sa3 •ssanrsom UoT3sST3TT psaoT3Usm LTsnoTnsad eq3 ;o ernw3sq asg3an; pow •snasnY U*srr'I so snusay ass; 'snusny (Tod mol asg3Ts ;o LzT3wds3 SUT41293 3T;;wa3 s43 pss3xe 3oU TT-,A 33e�oad sTg3 moa; 3T;iw23 s3UTs pas '33eroad sTg3 ;o LTsaspa*dspuT sasr" ;� f poogaogg2Tsu sq3 UT msTgoad 3T;;sa3 sq3 souTS •Tsnoaddt ` 33sGoad ;o uoT3Tpuo3 t epwm *q TTTw uoT33smae3UT :{Tod my/snasny 3rw't, *q3 sw TwaTt 3T;;w23 w pavr03 uoT3ngTa3Uo3 w '4TsooT3TPPY •96 03 zaTun TCT noa; s`' "'r'• �� L3Tsusp sq3 ps3npsa g3Tgw 33sfoad sq3 ;o uST npsa '' ,: aa.i sq3 Lg esalsp w o3 ps3wlT3Tm *left r33tdaT essgy 19339dmT esTou 3T;;sa3 put L3xwnb aTt ps3sT3osst g3Tw' r 'uoT3ss3uo3 p*steaoa; *TgTssod pus•aT;;sa3 psnsa*n *1,. :epnT3UT uoT3TsodrTp aTtgs put e33sdzi 3T;To*dt •Tsnoaddt 33*�oad ;o sual3Tpuo3 to p*gor33t eq TTTA ipTq^,, nannsm UoT3w2T3Tm ;o *onr3sq smsmaoaTA= eq-3 no w33*;y* i Jy snT3wTm=o 3osaS;Tu8T9 UT 3Tnna o3 peso*dxs Sou sT Ttnoadds z3t�oad o3 3usnssnd sanaao g3Tgw 3u*mdoTeeeQ� ( �.�Y '•� t spw slew daTpaT; lnTmoTToi tip 'asodma :'�� sasdmT•Tt3oaoosT+ae T:raTi eR3 PmaepTsooa Pas,f!+�T!;P}s,�T!sl.a,-s�"5 L�A �' i , i ` ` 1. S. Loss of open space and agriculturally productive land to intensive urban use. This project is surrounded if"%. by urban developments which have already dhinished the agricultural viability of the area. Since the General Plan Open Space Element only calls for preservation of agricultural areas outside designated urban areas, this impact is not deemed significant. 6. Overcovering of land (54%) and increased drainage. Reduction of water quality in drainage runoff. Drainage channels which will receive the runoff y have sufficient capacity, and the quality of surface runoff will be no different from urban runoff from surrounding developed areas. Ihis impact is in- significant. 7. Increased area noise and light. This impact was reduced by a redesign and relocation of the recreation area, and by the inclusion of mitigation measures related to sound and visual barriers and shielding for lights. These mitigations are to be made conditions of project approval, so these impacts are deemed insignificant. All other impacts not specifically mentioned are deemed insignificant. QS) The rezone is found to be consistent with all elements of the Butta County General Plan. t Tha rezone from "R-1" (single-fs=L17 residential) and "R-3" , (madium dansity residential) to "PA-C" Yplanned area-�'uster),-property located north of Tom Polk Avenue, south of Lassan Avenue and vest of El Paso Way, identified as AP 44-21-67 and 68, Chico was approved, subject to the following conditions; Ordinancs 2196 was adopted and the Chairman authorised to sign: 1. Submit road and drainage plans-to the Public Works Departmnat for approval, and install all the required facilities. .Y 2. Provide 20 foot radius property line returns at all ctreet intersections. •t' 3. Indicata a 50 foot building setback line from the eentarline of Tom Polk Avenue. Indicate a 20 foot building setback line from the edge �. of the roadway on main interior roads. 4. Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street inter- I sections per County requirements. Submit four alternative street e A names for each street to the County address coordinator for approval. S. Street grades mad other street featares shall tompl7 with engineering standards. 001 NEW 4"51 40 Iv LOM��ldl t'•��: `r 'iv ��•. •!r _ +fes j .�• a ...;.;' �• .tri r • •I 't;��`Lt��r '•rr ��<'?„ �.a, ~ t:� ����/� �.r° /* Wf 5,J:4 Jt 'I't"'A �f` 7A!: t �I i yr ?i 3 ',a"�`"'�s.; . 1,.,.aat,: ttt?s wtis�unxCot ,�g?�YA� stq W s06y zsdnS sI,MIT I .2"vgM znsTAssdnS s slog r z LsT,"OW aT=TVto Pss* TuaalzlS 'uTTOQ sso9randnS taff •pvnoaddt sT dsm Tsar; szo;vq 3DT12TTP !I asnss oaTgJ 3stsg3aom sq3 zo; ;mp7Aozd 3nsmssss m vq ITTA sast,T, 'TC •pazTnbvz sq TTtgs 3uvodoTvnap aq: ggnozg3 Am psTsesz3 *g3• ;o g3PTA vq3 3ua- m pas 'szssuTSag 193*M VTaze;TTn Lq p*2Tsvp *q ITTA s*T3TTTa*; WU 'SI sTnU uojsma3x3 LmdmoJ vzWes zvzvM f *True;T1TJ g3TA saarpz030T ZT psarnbaa sq TTsgs uo-; ms3Ys ttTrm U:WA y -OC •psrog 7023tsoJ e3TTft a*39M T?4eTs*1 TTuze;TT*J sqa put auvmassdoa tnTaag 4tmoJ a93 ;0 AaTnaz aq3 03 320Ggns sq pmt 'papT-ad sq TTrgs atav36f.9 T*sodaTp 89tnaa vq3 ;a zTsdaa pas 'samras3aTrm 'aoT3rTTnsuT Tv7 so; ssfTaoad 3Tg3 Zua=az8t szt+unosmoq y •64 •pztog 10z3a0J 63TTvnb sa3*h TsmOTSag tTaao;TTrl sq3 pmt zavmazvda0 g7Ttsg L2=03 vtp ;o s37v=xTnbss sq1 Sam TTiMs 'auwmdoTvrap 9q3 mTg3TA *=3*Ls TvsodsTp a3ams M •qZ r 'papTAozd sq scum 'selq Gam 4a43 gaTgn z"+3TETnbaaaad Lm SaT3t39 put ,,3cazLaT9Aap sq3 os za3tn DT397mop 6Tddns 03 aTgt pmt SaTTITn azt'6ag3 avrz BaTmv LzvdmoJ 2-.1was sa3vM zT=o;TT*0 sq3 mol; aoT3t4mv=aop z2g30 ao sa3341 Y 'LZ F '39m osTT vq TT9gs a3n2mazTnbaa z9g3o Ant put 13ua,m3avdva vaT3 L3unoJ v33nS 9q3 Lq aoT3avdaaT TVUT; o1 3aaGgns vq TTaga s4T3TTT3t3 •tznoq Z 3911T 3t ;o poTzod t so; paaTr39na 'RM OOOZ vq o3 sT hei; flZU 'CZOS pzvpa*3S oxzoM 3TIgrd ;o 3matpzvdoa o3 SUTpao3at paTTV29ul sTvpcy 919 rnioM uoai goreg Smol so aTvp(rA 0i6 gaT-d AoTO aq o3 vat s3mapLq vql •m1d 3uamdoTvnap aq3 uo zmamasvdn 9aT3 43anoJ 933ng 7q3 Lq pa3saTpuT sv p93saoT sq o3 vas s3u*spLq vaT3 '9Z •prtd so p*3w9az9as aq TMv numoaaser •tZ 'anwey 3nog Soy ;0 SITT203m02 aq3 ;0 ' 3001 0s mTg37A Put L*M 0=10A TI ;0 DUIT293msI aq3 ;0 380; 09 UPPTA 3g8T04 UT asgaaT Z9 p913xv Sou ITtgs SUTaas; sq3 3*q3 uoT3dsaxs sq3 g3Tn uvTd 3u*mdoTvnvp vq3 mo pv3•:';PaT s* P*preoad sq TTvgs SaTauv; •9Z •moT3TPmo0 SaTATT s UT psaTVZUTtm Put '99amspTns 3usa*rpt taxa; ttasaas aT2*n00t put TvnvjA s *AvTgat 03 m1Td 3usmd0Tsnsp sq3 uo ps3taTpnT at p*plAosd sq TTtgt SuTdraspan 'CZ .'�s •uorlanz3suoa Surznp ps3uv=ldm7 *q TT*qs SnTTfirTzds tt Bans ssznsysm Toa3uoa asna -ZZ b •ssrou meT3ana3suo3 sanpsa 03 sssI;;tm *3sTadoaddt g37A ps337; •q TT*gs 3uaadTnbe TTv Pas 'eznoq 30TILsp Ttma00 03 Ps3aT23ssz sq TT1gs 9*73TAT372* m0T32na3sao3 •rz •*nuaey 3911 pmt sntsdy. Tod soy ;0 moT3006393aT aq3 3t TRUSTS 0T;;*a3 san3n; s ;0 ssoa 9q3 ;o szvgs Y e,zsdoTvnsp sg3 ev 4uneq sq3 g37A p93Tsodep sq TTsgs (000'ns ;0 ;". *3ttaT3n Tt303 1 uodn peraq vedoTssap %I= asd),szvgs r7s3-.wd r •pZ ', it 1 - ,.v �. � ,.N.<ti+. ..•.r.f'.lLL.0�+►MW.tir.M... .yyAyM,EMy�M�YtiR1•�141P� ..4•• .l. :'Submit road and drainage plana to the Public Works 7epart^ent for approval, and install all the required facilities. "•" 2. Provide 10 foot radius property line returns at all street intersee.tiors. 3. Indicate a 50 foot building setback line from the centerline of Tom Polk Avenue. Indicate a 20 foot building setback line from the edge of thn roadway on main ieterior roads. 4. Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street inter— sections par County requirements. Submit four alterative street names for each street to the County address coordinator for approval. al. ; S. Street grsdes and other street features shall comply with engineering standards. 6. Provide a permanent solution for drainage, or drainage requirements }' shall be as show on the tentative map. 7. All easements of record to be show on the final tun. 8. Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with County requirements,. accepted design criteria, and PG&E reca=endations. intersection lighting is to be installed as indicated on the development plan. 9. All exterior lighting shall be shielded, directed, and located in such a canaar as to prevent glare to adjacent properties. 10. A 0.10 foot AC overlay shall be placed on Tom Polk Avenue from lip of guttar to lip of gutter, from the development to East Avenue. 11. Provide a standard driveway approach at the intersection of the Interior road and Lassen Avenue. 12. All interior roadways are to be a mi=i=u:m of 24 feet in width, 2 inch AC, AB with AC barrier curb. A 13•. Interior roads shall be designed and constructed so as to reduce r through—traffic circuation and speeds over 25 mph. t 14. The point where the interior road meats El Verano Way shall be used as an emergency e_dt only. A barrier shall be conatructed, and subject to approval by the Butte Couacy Fire Department. 15. Grading plan shall be submitted to the Public Works •Departmant for approval, and all the required facilities shall be iastal'_ed. ,a - P�fY 4 v' :,•�q,'���1 '.� !•.-'"Lid:^ � ;� .. � .. f 1 - ' + t 4 ,� ` r r .o- i i �� 4 y t u�16.; Stop'.sigaj Clzn_ raffic only) shall be placed the project :I.antraaees to Tom Polk Avenue and Lassen Avenue. , 17.' Stora drainage of that Portion of the development located In Sbasta Uaion Drainage Assesemnat District (SUDAD) to drain to t5- SUDAD ditch • {�!1 ;'unless design calculations indicate that the portion of t;,e development in the southaastsrly part of the SUDAD district can drain north to the existing storm drain line at Lassen Avenue. Ii 18.: An off site sidewalk, constructed to County standards, shall be provided on the west side of Tom Polk Avenue between the southerly y terminus of the project site and East Avenue. All other walkways Internal to the project shall be constructed of asphalt and developed as shown on the development plan.. r'. i;19. 'A seven foot fence be constructed and that there be a landscaping ?;• area behind the fence along property boundaries of residences on ,.,. Pante Avenue. :`20. A pro—rata share (per unit developed based upon a total estimate ' of $25,000) shall be deposited with the County as the developer's share of the cost of a future traffic signal at the intersection of } Tom Polk AVeaue and East Avenue. 21. Construction acitivities shall be restricted to normal daylight hours, and all equipment shall be fitted with appropriate mufflers to reduce construction noise. ;•• , 22. Dust control measures such as sprinkling shall be implemented during construction. 23. Landscaping shall be provided as indicated on the development plan to w . achieve a visual and acoustic screen from adjacent residences, and maintained in a living condition. 1 24. Fencing shall be provided as indicated on the development plan with :'. the exception that the fencing shall not e..cteed 42 inches in height vithin 50 feet of the centerline of El Verano Way and within 50 feet f ' of the centerline of Tom Polk Avenue. 25. Assessments shall be segregated or paid. '21,. Fire hydrants are to be located as indicated by the Butte Cou-ty Fir: Department on the development plan. The hydrants are to be Clow :rich `y 950 Yodels or Long Beath Iron Works 614 models installed according ' ?�+ to Department of Public Works Standard S,127. Fire flow is to be 2000 GM, sustained for a period of at least 2 hours. Facilities shall fl" be subject to final inspection by the Butte County Fire Department, and any other requirements shall be also met. 27.' A letter or ocher documentation from the Cali°or_i.a Water Service Company stating that they are willing and able to supply domestic water to the development, and stating any prerequisites which they may have, oust be provided. 28. The sewage disposal systexs within the development shall met the requirements of the County Health Department and.the Califotmia , f• Regional Water Quality Control Board. -"y4 a !1�'fw.i+lfi/+o ..�^".y„w""""_"""'._ ,K.wr'►� ,ari�w'T�±..i.,.. .I.> ....- _. ,V1, 4 c �r I I '14 JI, :.Z.7z. .......... ,r 4. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 14 ACRES OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE r' °'`• BETWEEN PANAMA AND LASSEN AVENUES IN CHZCO, CALIFORNIA ' by , Peter M. Jensen K Research Archaeologist a California State University, Chico , I ` f On Tuesday, January 24, 1978, an intensive, on-foot archae- ological reconnaissance was undertaken of approximately 14 acres of a proposed condominium development site, located in T22N, R1E, of the Chico, California (7.5' Series), U.S.G.S. Topographic Quadrangle, between Panama and Lassen Avenues (see accompanying map). The archaeological reconnaissance was undertaken in order to determine if significant cultural resources which might con- ceivably be located within the project site area would be ad- versely impacted by the proposed development. The project engi- neering firm of Ringel and Associates of Chico thus contracted with the University Foundation of California State University in order to secure the reconnaissance as described above. ' Prior to the field reconnaissance the records of the Dis- trict 2 Clearinghouse of the Society for California Archaeology at Chico were examined for existing recorded sites within the project area. No archaeological or other significant cultural r resources are currently recorded for the project area. The on-foot survey was conducted by Peter M. Jensen, Research Archaeologist at California State University. Field techniques , involved walking non-random, north-south/east-west transects over the entire project area, examining the surface for evidence of cultural resources. In areas where the ground cover hindered L visual observation, the grass was periodically removed to expose the surface. All rodent middens and holes were checked for possible indications of subsurface cultural resources. t No evidence of significant historic or prehistoric cultural materials was observed within the project area. Therefore, archae- ological clearance is recommended for the proposed development project. However, should any subsurface historic or prehistoric cultural materials be encountered during the course of the project, a qualified archaeologist should be called in immediately in order to properly mitigate the adverse impacts of the project against the cultural resources involved. Appendix II FEENEY ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Robert J. Feeney, Civil Engineer 389-C Connors Court Chico, CA 95926 ' 530499-0409 Fax 530-899-0943 December 9, 1998 Steve Betts Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 4 Re Eastwood & Oak PUD Dear Steve, The owner of Eastwood Oaks is proposing to convert the tennis court area in his complex, which is not being used, into accessory uses. These proposed uses are: garages, storage units, parking for recreation vehicles, campers, and boats. Enclosed is a site plan of existing and proposed uses. If you have anyquestions, please contact,me. Thank you. Sincerely, Robert J. Feeney cc: Bob Wray Planning Division av DEC 1 11998 Oroville,California } y 4 • i k .. i 6p hq. CW,42 WA —10 b'onUP 1w .12 ay •yra 'f Jra�, rte• Qom(.. 4s' �' fag to � �" "g�y�/e " ••ai � � �,�rvnl e+y�F ',,�"� `� g1,1r. �_ � Y � TrC � � tV ��iM!!i• nl! �c.V ¢s4"y'a �"" � ti•!I Y-� ,„iry.C! Y►/ \ irYl `� � � w_ 1rV pyo r r'ld. �' %z. a t;. un' '��': ar.r � "� ar i �• A� � f� 1+x.5 r..� a� ."•� rh raw '.: - �!: •r. .' "" rc,• � � '"°' fry - �' n•v � � �'a✓ � � 'a" :4. 4 iY y '� •.;..ti....__-...s...�.�f..: �.,,(.:n.�i...._u,_.nr_aais-.c+..:-.• .ti'�m.i._•a,.. i __ _ ._ ..� � ...:._.rn..�... ., _ . ... �..�.. � �._. _s...,. .A..i...�. . .. _. .,___ .. <... ..- _ .. a ...,..._.,e _... .. -... ... w-l.u...'_ _..7...3�•..wr:._aa...:xif� ?.�.�:..�i.. _�:�i`f]�.'_ _ �.-N : - Agate �0111Zt LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY "� �' ��»`."• YDS ; PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES _ r 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 January 19, 1999 Feeney Engineering& Surveying Attn: Robert Feeney 389-C Connors Court Chico, CA 95926 Re: Conversion of tennis courts to storage area on APN 007-410-017 (Eastwood Oaks PUD) Dear Mr. Feeney: The Planning Division has reviewed your request to convert the existing tennis courts into a storage area and has determined that a modification to the existing Planned Unit Development (PUD) zone is necessary. The requested storage use was not proposed when the site was zoned PUD and therefore was not included in the ordinance that created the PUD zone. Please refer to the enclosed copy of the Eastwood Oaks PUD ordinance. The modification to the PUD zone will require approval by the Butte County Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. In order for the County to act on your proposed change, a rezone application, accompanied by the required processing fee, must be submitted to the Planning Division. A rezone application is enclosed. If you require any additional information on this matter or on completing.the rezone application please let me know. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Associate Planner enc: Ordinance No. 2196 Rezone Application V i4d," i•-----�' -- ; ..�. I -L.I/Yn (71 sin, �?(77 1 i az 71 07 L-1ps * 's st rc ,►M r i. '�- •'� '� � � (�� St,htj.r y�jtxl'1•'37; f,c���oe ;,•c1f+.;'r3�+v�c.nMlrivc`V�?Y � Ohl)��Jlk9ri� t1n10�rVfy � � ��('t��s! '141X� t 1nMbr.. <i I) ..1/ �. •. qtr� :� ^• ,�.i �' �ItriMVH, V—A94 �--- `,+ '• � ; j`A .• .....` ,� ..J -.. ,.� •�:7,p, i .• l�� of �'� � (t) Nc�•,v vH3��" •, t�.Z�'trU•K�fC wnN�3dtiD��m y�s� �'�� ' zo—MW3� fN.d"60j` (4t timid V 4ntUcrod�yy, r _ . t.) ,dlvb3lbvr\ t�+rnodu�yltd { . h),19j t+rvn�daV�dl�, � I ' --- – ,.. (Li) valo NMt3ty V W45 430-1 r Hely a 4l��ty�3 izr*V-4) ;'Nt ol+d •. �` i. �`�,f r rt, •- ••c � .t? Dom;`Oy^1 a+�• •!�.N' �•�`y�`�f7 .4171 }� f) , r•Ki+����� d��':`;: •sY '•'As,Yj,;? n ` j" ,t•�, aas tSr1 �' �E�c+�}� � .fk?i ��, , 'i,�, , Ali;' �,`�� •. � �•�:.. �: '# �: •1.r1 .. 44, �• t� fi n .� �� 1►�t�•I. fir` .�..{S`, ::;i�j.��'� w,F-.i''�!. � 7}!p .,i�:`����`' ': {• +""T.!i►t.,,•„ � tit��/?tt.��•�;� - c�`} J*.r,.��t. �t0+,'} :1. •f��t,T.\t. 'v moi` • �, t, t,t ,ti. . r; ..tw•• •'r 1 '� �••1tt r.'Li�± off-.•`.,`!1(� •�fr•i•1'.•!� i �"' {� :� tt .ie raw .��� ! .•,.1� S: ,:., t. f•t'�i�.►_ :r �r• t s• 1 t T'i •,i€. ,'a, •••;,�. 1. (y•�. -,4�X,�:.-- _ .� � ... '� '.C•';.,' .., • .. 1 �..itl� .f+, •�• � •, ,j� ,•. �; �'�� �tiS 11 ,r.•J`.•;•�, f .,. �. • �;Ah�f`r f ��. .S �••.i, ..�.'�♦ _�.. '.Y, few :�. ..'y1 ,Va .�••� T •.�" I •,.� iii j •1 r , ,j '�.,'s= �. !. "��Iw +g,• '+..v `7,"�.v'�'.:�•�•: '�• / �'' �' .i�•�s.� ,';•";'`'�• .j_�•f.. a•�••• r `+/f�l;� ^r .. �' t♦ J• Count : _. .... trite LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 April 30, 1999 Feeney Engineering Attn: Robert Feeney 389 C Connors Court Chico, CA 95926 Re: Modification to a PUD zone (Eastwood Oaks PUD)for Feeney Engineering on APN 007- 410-017, File# REZ 99-05 Dear Mr. Feeney: Enclosed please find copies of the comments we have received from other Butte County agencies regarding your application for a modification to a PUD zone. Please review these comments and the conditions that are requested as part of the project's approval. Should you have any further questions regarding these comments, please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Associate Planner Enc. +BUTTE OOUNAT AIRPORT T LAND USOOMM' ISSION + •7 County Center Drive,Oroville,CA 96965• (530)538-7601 FAX(530)538-7785• TO: Butte County Planning Division FROM: Butte County Airport Land Use Commission SUBJECT: NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING FINDINGS AND/OR COMMENTS: ALUC File No. A99-03 (Butte County Rezone REZ99-05-Feeney Engineering/Wray) on APN 007-410-017: A request for consistency findings for a Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development (PUD)to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD. The project site is located at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue, Chico. DATE NOTICE MAILED: April 28, 1999 This is your official notice that the Airport Land Use Commission held a public meeting on April 21, 1999 and approved the findings and/or materials attached as Exhibits A and Al. If you have any further questions or desire additional information, please call Laura Webster, of the ALUC staff, at (916) 533-1131. The project file may be reviewed at the Department of Development Services, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Planning Division .APR 2 9 1999 0r0v1U0,Ca1if0Mia •Butte County •Airport Land Use Commission • 1 +BUTTE COUNAr AIRPORT LAND UICOMMISSION + •7 County Center Drive,Oroville,CA 95965• (530)53&7601 FAX(530)538-7785• EXHIBIT A BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR: A99-03 (County of Butte REZ99-05 - Feeney Engineering/Wray) on APN 007-410-017 The Airport Land Use Commission has prepared the following findings based upon data contained within the 1998 Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan(CMAEP). This data, in turn is based upon the findings of a number of studies, documents and reports generated by individuals, firms and agencies recognized as having expertise in the field of Airport Land Use Planning and land use compatibility. (See Exhibit Al, List of References) The following findings have been prepared at the direction of the ALUC and are for the consideration of the County of Butte (local agency)when making a decision on the project. Section 1: ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS A. No environmental documentation was submitted at the time of review. Section 2: PROJECT CONSISTENCY FINDINGS A. Chapter 3 of the 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook identifies four functional categories that address airport land use compatibility concerns. These include: Overflight Protection/Land Use Compatibility, Safety, Noise, and Airspace Protection. The applicant's proposal has been found to be consistent with protection measures and policies contained in the 1998 Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan that are designed to address all of these items: Overflight Protection/Land Use Compatibility 1. The project site is located outside of the Overflight Protection Zone and Outer Safety Zone depicted in Drawing CIC-14 and the Departure Clear Area shown in Drawing CIC-16. It is also located outside of the Flight Corridor shown on Drawings CIC-4 and CIC-6, the flight tracks for light and heavy aircraft depicted in Drawing CIC-2, and the Compatible Land Use Zone (CLUZ) designations shown in Drawing CIC-13. No specific land use recommendations are given within the CMAEP for the project area. However, unihabited storage units and RV parking are considered by the Commission to be compatible uses at this location. •Butte County •Airport Land Use Commission • 1 Safety 2. Accident scatter maps based upon data generated by the University of California-Berkeley, Institute of Transportation Studies (1993) and Hodges and Shutt,have been adopted as part of the CMAEP (Drawings CIC-17 and CIC-18)and support the finding that the project site is not located in an area which has an elevated likelihood of being impacted by aircraft accidents. Noise 3. The project site is located outside of the projected 55 dB CNEL contour for the Chico Municipal Airport (Drawings CIC-3 and CIC-15). Exhibit 4-4 of the CN AEP"Land Use Compatibility for Noise Environments," shows that industrial uses(e.g.,the closest category to storage type uses) are considered normally acceptable in areas exposed to up to between 65 and 70 dB CNEL. Airspace Protection 4. The project site is located within the Horizontal Surface of the Chico Municipal Airport(Drawing CIC-5). The height of the storage units will be limited to a single story. Although a specific height limitation has not been established,the structures are not expected to exceed 15 feet in height. Based upon USGS topographic information provided by the Butte County Planning Division, the site elevation is approximately 190 feet above mean sea level (MSL). Therefore, the proposal could result in a total project elevation of approximately 205 feet MSL. The height of the Horizontal Surface is 388 feet MSL. Therefore, the ALUC finds that project will not penetrate any FAR Part 77 Surfaces. Section 3: RECOMMENDED CONDITION A. All project lighting shall be directed within the project site and shielded to prevent adverse impacts on adjacent properties and aircraft flight activities. •Butte County •Airport Land Use Commission • 2 +BUTTE QOUNq� AIRPORT LAND UICOMMISSION + •7 County Center Drive,Oroville,CA 9596.5• (530)538-7601 FAX(530)538-7785 0 EXHIBIT Al List of References Data supporting the ALUC's findings have been generated from studies and reports prepared by recognized professionals and agencies with expertise in Airport Land Use Planning and land use compatibility. These include, but are not limited to: R. Dixon Speas Associates -Prepared 1978 Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan. Caltrans Division of Aeronautics - 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. University of California Berkeley,Institute of Transportation Studies (1993) -Prepared accident scatter data presented in Figure 9E on page 9-13 of the 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. This data was used to develop Drawing CIC-17 of the CMAEP. Hodges and Shutt-Prepared accident scatter data presented in Chapter 8 of the 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. This data was used to develop Drawing CIC-18 of the CMAEP. •Butte County •Airport Land Use Commission • 3 ° y Ar BUTTE COUNT G �,m �� AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 2525 Dominic Drive,Suite J LAWRENCE D.ODLE V Chico,California 95928 Air Pollution Control Officer y Tel: (530)891-2882 W.JAMES WAGONER 6 ex,t Fax:(530)891-2878 Asst.Air Pollution Control Officer March 24, 1999 Stephen Betts, Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: REZ 99-05 Dear Mr. Betts: The District has reviewed the request for comments for a Rezone to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for resident of the Eastwood Oaks PUD in Chico. The District recommends incorporating the applicable Standard Mitigation Measures (reference District Indirect Source Review Guidelines)into the proposed project. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed project. If you have any questions, please contact me at 891-2882. Sincerely, w Gail Williams Air Quality Planner File No 3451.1 j r' � • a ` BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application:Feeney Engineering,REZ 99-05 DATE: March 9,1999 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts i The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project,as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed,please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD)to convert a tennis court to storage units and RVan rking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD on property zoned PUD(Planned Unit Development)located at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue,approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue,Chico, identified as APN 007-410-017. Supervisorial District No. 3. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) PLANNING COMMISSION - _DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON Lly 8, 1999. COMMENTS,IF ANY,ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 24, 1999. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): By: VI LV S. Date: `ate UU 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,Cali""�&E -7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 MAR z 51999 0MVJH9,Qd10m1® I ���{� I t ,; . J.. 1 +BIE COUNTY ALOE T LAND USE ONMISSION + •7 County Center Drive,Oroville,CA 95965• (530)538-7601 FAX(530)538-7785• MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division FROM: Laura Webster, ALUC Staff DATE: March 24, 1999 SUBJECT: Request For Comments on Feeney Engineering/Wray Rezone (REZ99-05) i Project Description/Location: Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development_(P.UD) to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD. The project site is located at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue, Chico, APN 007-410-017. The following informal comments are provided-by.staff based upon a cursory-revie%t of the application materials and maps that were provided. (1)_ According to drawings within the .C.hico_Municipat Airport. Environs_RIan_(CMAEP), the project site is located within the Airport Area of Influence for the Chico Municipal Airport (CIC-6) and the Horizontal.. Surface_.(C1CG5�_for-that_facility__ The-project elevation including proposed storage structures is estimated to be not more than 205 feet above Mean Sea Level (MS.L). The-elevation of the HorizontaL.Surface. is 388 MSL. Therefore the project will not penetrate any FAR Par 77 Surfaces. (2) The site is located outside of, the-following: • The Overflight Protection Zone and-Outer Safety Zone depicted in Drawing (CIC-14). • The CDF Air Tanker Departure Zone indicated on Drawing (CIC-16). • The Heavy and Light Aircraft Flight Tracks shown on Drawing (CIC-2) and the Flight Corridor depicted in Drawing (CIC-6). • All Compatible Land Use Zones as defined within the CMAEP (CIC-13). • The projected 55 dB CNEL contour for the airport (CIC-3 and CIC-15). (3) According to accident scatter information presented in Drawings CIC-17 and CIC-18, the site is not located in an area with an elevated likelihood of aircraft related accidents. i (4) The City of Chico is currently in the process of preparing an Updated Airport Master Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport which is expected to include plans for extending •Butte County •Airport Land Use Commission • 1 Runway 13R-31 L approximately 1,500 feet to the south. These and-other_facility modifications directed by the Updated Airport Master Plan could affect the location of_current airport safety zones,. FAR-Part-7-7 Surfaces,-noise contours-and-flight-track patterns. However, because the proposed storage units and RV parking area will not be inhabited and the height..of-the-structures will-not exceed a. singte_story„the proposed development is not expected to have any impacts on anticipated airport improvements or future operations. Based upon the above, it appears that the project is consistent with the 1998 Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan. However,.-formal consistency findings must-be-made by the Airport Land Use Commission. ' The following condition is likely to be recommended by the ALUC: a. All project lighting shall be directed within the project site and shielded to prevent adverse impacts on adjacent properties and aircraft fl.ight_activities. It is anticipated that the ALUC will review the project and make its findings during the Commission's regular meeting on April 21, 1999. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please call me at 533-1131. •Butte County •Airport Land Use Commission • 2 BUTTE COUNTY D O U' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ,1 PLANNING DIVISION — 9 i, TO': City of Chico t FROM: Butte County Planning Division ► pCO RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Feeney Engineering,REZ 99-05 DATE: March 9, 1999 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequaie to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed,please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD)to convert a tennis court to storaupe units and RVap rking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PI JD on property zoned PUD(Planned Unit Development)located at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue,approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue,Chico, identified as APN 007-410-017. Supervisorial District No.1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - _DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON Ju y 8, 1999. COMMENTS,IF ANY,ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 24, 1999. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): i By: /1 Date: 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 -530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 's,� r.�: ��-�i i r. � � '� �1 L...—' , � ,.. M 1 "y r _ r, � � - s �,� '"� ,. Environmental Health BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MAR - 41999 PLANNING DIVISION Chico, California TO: Environmental Health FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Feeney Engineering,REZ_99-05 DATE: March 3, 1999 CONTACT PERSON: 5/fj The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project,as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed,please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application fon ez�one—to odify a Planned Unit Development(TUD) convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PI JD on property zoned PUD(Planned Unit Development)located on the north end of Tom Polk Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue,Chico, identified asfAPN 007-410-017. Supervisorial District No. . THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON My a, 1999. COMMENTS,IF ANY,ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN _March 17, 1999, If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): Pla na Division MAR 18 1999 On-Vff-;CWfomia By: / ( Date: 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 -530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 i I r� s i . . 1 , Planning Division BUTTE COUNTY MAR 17 1999 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION ovill®,CAllomia TO: California Department of Forestry FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application:Feeney Engineering,REZ 99-05 DATE: March 9, 1999 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project,as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed,please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD)to convert a tennis court to storaee units and RVan rking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD on property zoned PUD(Planned Unit Development)located at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue..approximately 500 feet north-of East Avenue,Chico, identified as APN 007-410-017. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON 7uly&, 1999. COMMENTS,IF ANY,ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 24,1999. If no comments or communications arreceived by the date the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): 41 By: Date: 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 -530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 j s t � � ��� l�T. - t � .J - i �. I ;� �•� �, ., 1, .� ,a , • ,.,�a ` t� � 'Lr4� .r •��:s. •_�„fix,'°�_ 'a� Yii .Via, wftnt BUTTE COUNTY N# 1 &% DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES D 1999 PLANNING DIVISION TO: LAFCo FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development-Application: Feeney Engineering,REZ 99-05 DATE: March 9, 1999 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below..The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project,as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed,please ca11538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD)to convert a tennis court to storau'e units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD on property zoned PUD(Planned Unit Development)located at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue,approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue,Chico, identified as APN 007-410-017. Supervisorial District No. 3. OhO /qq THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON July 8, 1999. COMMENTS,IF ANY,ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 24,1999. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): PVCCLS LD C47ED AP f &,-eake Chico eDA ( S><oroa a w/// a6uf/ R-_1 Amt r. /W'///, A4ere 9. CSA &ZS aha N linage I /dh IC6einq /n Cflhace 7 L••/J h-1•nn 3. dada /Nlosauil/o �OHTI�D� SUPS? / # c. 4. R. o. 5. r.U S'. D & 13U41e Co llea e 7 C5-4 114 N' ,re CS4 IG4 (4n;,,.,1 Confro/� By: C Date: f If 431 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 -530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 i f lWmIng OMelon BUTTE COUNTY MAR 1 01999 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION CA8lT118 TO: Building Division FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Feeney Engineering,REZ 99-05 DATE: March 9, 1999 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed,please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD)to convert a tennis court to storage units and RVan rking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD on property zoned PUD(Planned Unit Development)located at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue,Tapproximately 500 feet north'of East Avenue,Chico, identified as APN 007-410-017. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON 7uly&, 1999. COMMENTS,IF ANY,ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 24,1999. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): pffiAPZS S zUe- u0(% . PCAKIS S *ecrA B s orL v tL 6-x)cotA146W AM1460BOPM a4J rh1r, 5 rr By: Date: d kmd 11 ej 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 -530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 � i c it ., ,. . �` � A F• � i ..»� ��. ��,t. ,mss .` �s - ,. .. � , �� .. ,,� !� '. ',. ,� moi. w .. -. r I I i ,J ��''��p yF�"�t-fir �.�'�Iw�'-•1 Planning Division BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MAR 0 9 1999 PLANNING DIVISION TO: Public Works OrOVille,California FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application:Feeney Engineering,REZ 99-05 DATE: March 3, 1999 CONTACT PERSON: r The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project,as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame.given, or if additional information is needed,please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD)to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PI JD on property zoned PUD(Planned Unit Development)located on the north end of Tom Polk Avenue; -2- .mately 500 feet north of East Avenue, hico, identified as APN 007-410-017. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) PLANNING COMMISSION - _DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON my 8, 1999. COMMENTS,IF ANY,ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 17, 1999. If,no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): Avy lwt,�a' ins 17-1-27 &o"f-6-,v is-y /Af731t/dWZ-'1'7 AV"arc_ 15-6,Z-oL✓ ^zl- 19W~^a--,7-- By: aye'By: Date: 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 -530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 ' I'lece p MAR 0 8 1999 it�. t ,, _ e fit. 1 '� y. '`t �. .��, ��� ♦t .\y y` `'\ � t ? ✓ \ t \\\1\ate `� �` •� t t't �tti`y\ �t \ t Ln16f V— k 4\ `t OW ] c d StV L` .tt` \4\,�` \i♦fib 1{ fir`�.c ' 7+ ,•+y '+ti `.t\`*•t� ti y �`�`` ti`'t LL ' �`r,-11.11 'h"'�s 9 ?\�'� � - ��- � P .�` t�•ty`'��\`\ `� .i; -� �a x5>yc� a ro+F S` *� K # � t'. ' �Y �`tt',,� �`,~` 't t y '•. t� b '�+ � 9X``°C '4 S+5> ��,�,+� w 'r.,b,Lc.rpt`. f•.q+Cj��$aw s>- '•� t`y � ., R !, X +•.x � fi y :i+' w c•�,. {� y ., -' tit 't.� . i ,� ` � y,.,.� �' .3 F C� �, s �ioo si.Ylfc�:,�'9^-�. ✓t Sri. 'ds t. t t.y'y a-,�'`' � r^�a i a rr�r 'r-ogfhY• r \ t �� o-� rn� '� ` f l'-,, yy_�� "f7 'l+\„yy 44,�"•t t t-.����; .- -`.._,v_.._,. _-. may` ��`'�� ',\..*��'`•. `. \\ t, .. ' N � I b _ ' • ,1 U • • - 4 Y .. • r ' • • • � • � • � • ` [� ` r y • r • 1 , � .. �: t� � .. • — � w L• •�,.. � ' � � �- t o. • • h, i ,. ' � i ��� <, �- • i' • P • �<� t � • • � e t" • ` ..• • - � � } • j Y ` w. • � S y P � . LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: REZ 99-05 AP# 007-410-017 APPLICANT: Feeney Engineering, 389 C Connors Court, Chico, CA 95926 OWNER: Robert and Donna Wray, 289 Tom Polk Circle, Chico, CA 95926 REPRESENTATIVE: REQUEST: Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD) to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV an rking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD SIZE: 6.07 acres LOCATION: at the north end of Tom Polk Avenin, annroximately 500 feet north of East Avenue, Chico SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT#3LEXISTING ZONING: Pi Planned Unit Develol2ment)_ ZONING HISTORY: 3-17-81 SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Rec'd 02-24-99 o r s t CO T ORDINANCE NO. 2196 ,.AN ORDINANCE ZONING A PORTION OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, A "PA-C" (PLANNED AREA-CLUSTER) .':DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTiR 24-29 The Board cf Superviosrs of the County of Butte, State of 2 California;"under and pursuant to Chapter 24-29 of the Butte County '.3 Code of said-County DO ORDAIN as follows: 4 :,SECTION 1. The hereinafter described area situated in the 8 County of Butte, State 'of California, shall be and it is hereby y i e. zoned as a "PA-C" (Planned Area Cluster) District, and such area 7 shall be subject to the restriction, restricted uses and regulation) 8 pursuant to Butte County Cole Section 24-136. 9 Said area so zoned being located in the itnincorporateL 10 area of Butte County, Chice, more particularly described as follows:) 11 All that certain real property sittkate in the County of Butte, State of California, described as follows: 12 Being a portion of Lot 1 of the Burson Tract, a 13 .portion of Lot 1 of the Hobart Subdivision, and a ' :.portion of projected Section 1S, T22N, R1E, MDB&,Mt 14 .= more particularly described as follows: 13Parcel one as shown on that certain Parcel Map filed ain the office of the Recorder of the County of Butte, State of California, on April 3, 1978, in Book 6S of Parcel Maps, at page 60. 17 Excepting therefrom that portion deeded to the Count" 1g of Butte, August 8, 1979, in Book 2311, of Official. Records, at page 206. 19 Containing 14.81E acres, more or less, Chico. 20 21 SECTION 2: The use and development of said property shall 22 be in accord with the development plan submitted by the applicant, 23 as conditioned and incorporated herein .by reference. Said condition- " i 24 ed development plan collectively consists of the following documents: 25 `'(a)' Development Plan (showing the location of buildings, 28 streets,''parking, recreation facilities and other major features }}ln Si If: 4 µ:,, SrNt{,�:iJ) .. •:1 ,'��;•- •- ��l���la:�1'.��rq'�l'.'b;hr,'ft;4Y,r,Y,S'�1::.r;'..':.i'.};'�'' 't' a .. i+ r•[�li", , ,�y.'t d .��{l �_ tib• �� 'y. _ �'. of the pro fact) �Y "1'` 2 (b) Septic tank and leach line layout and waterline - fire �4 •. 3 hydrant location plan. !' 4 (c) -Storm draindratin and road template plan. :Lr 5 (d) Landscape. plan. k e SECTION 3: Notwithstandi-,: the provisions of Chapter 24-7. ` M 7 126 of the Butte County Code the following provisions shall govern 8 the use and development of said property: 9 (a) The dwellings as shown on the development plan shall I to be limited to residential uses and activities; and 11 (b) .The recreation building ar-d facilities as shown on the 12 development plan shill be limited to recreation, social, maintenance 13 and administrative uses and activities associated with the develop- I T :� • V. ment, exclusively; and 15 (c) The.storage of materials and objects around the 18 residential dwellin tional facilities as shown on the s and recrea .;.. g 17 deveiopment,plan shall be limited to those which are necessary to, r ; 18 appurtenant:`to and customarily associated with the residential and 19recreational use of the development; -and 20 (d) The height of all principal structures as shown on u. '�. 21 the development plan shall not exceed a height of two (2) stories or S feet; and .22 : 23 (e):.,The keeping of livestock including horses ind the •:, �t 24 e'::lopment:-of stables shall be prohibited; and 25 (f). Signs shall.be limited to an identification of the 28 evelopmerit-nottoexceed'two (2) in number with a maximum size of fir:./� •-N���� ?,t�!,;ar,:. ,�.✓i i =1Ntttit yt� } Mh a Y �" t • �h�y � .a 1• SO'square feet each' except that signs advertising the development 2 and sale and/or rental units may be permitted until 85 percent )`i•• Y P :! 3 of the dwellings`are.sold and/or rented or until a period of five '4 (5) years has elapsed which ever is first. The developer shall be responsible for the removal of all signs associated with the sale .� 6 nd/or'Tental of:said property. : SECTION 4e�'A,In the event the residential units are offered ,. '~8 for sale, the developer,,shall establish a homeowners association to „N.t -9 be responsible for the.maintenanca and upkeep of the utilities, l0 roads, and all other property owned in common. The developer shall II 11 assume responsibility for theunsold, remaining memberships until 12 such time as the homeowners association can reasonably assume the 13 financial responsibilities for the maintenance and upkeep of tho 14 tilities, roads and all other real property owned in common. To lb ensure that the .homeowners association is ,adequately formed to meet le these responsibilities, the developer shall submit copies of said 1; homeowners association agreement to the Butte County Planning Depart 18 ent for reviewn ad approval prior to the recordation of any sub- . , 1g sequent map authorizing the sale of any real property in conjunction i 20 with this development. 21 SECTION 5: This Ordinance shall be and it is hereby f 22 declared to be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) s' 23 days after the date of its passage, and before the expiration of •24 fifteen (1S) days after its passage, this Ordinance shall be published once with.the names of the members of the Board of ` 26 Supervisors voting for and against it in the .Chico Enterprise, a �.w?} +�'+�! ate `''.�• �. My,�`,•� �� �,� ,t ' •`'i 4 r. i n a •'`' . = 1 newspaper published in the County of Butto, State of California. 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, on the 17th day of March 3 4 1981, by the following vote: 5 AYES: Supervisors Dolan, Seraceai and CMsirmen Moseley d NOES: Supervisor Wheeler Y 7 ABSENT:. Supervisor 1.amke 8 NOT VOTING: None v3 9 10 Chairman, Butte County Board o Supervisors 11 �� 12 ATTEST: CLARK.A'.'NELSCN, County Clerk-Recorder r and:Ex-officio Clerk of the Board 14 15 By ' 17 , .b 18 1920i- �r 21 `7.2 23 24 25 . !Www 6'':41 ( le Po. 81-9 �Pa A S COl1NTY•` • INa COMIMIeB10 ` Tbi "$UTT 'PLANN STAFBFINDINGS January 7, 1981 �. ��4��; .,, •nhLl;l�YLi4.• ,.� fir. �.'�rerglo Inc. (William Ebert) • .�K. +.., APPLICANT: Eastwood Oaks OWNLR: same EXISTING ZONING: R-1 and R-3 RDQUEST=. Rezone to PA-C r. LOCATION: To the north of Tom Polk Ave-, south of. Laasen Ave., and west of �.. El Paso Ave., Chico AP NO.: 44-21-67 and 68 14.816 acres SIZE: PURPOSE OF APPLICATION: "We 2 toled PA-Cor a backrezone in 1978; project and stopped, and we are ready to proceed ; again with rezone application." applicant proposes a planned The app ••' condominium development of 120 town- house units on the 14.8 acre sites at a density of 8.1 units per acre. There will be 21 two story buildings to be constructed in four phases over a four year period. The proposal includes recreational fsciliites 6.8 acres of common area/greenbelt EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDINr LAND USE.: Walnut orchard to the west; Almond Grove Mobile Home Park to the north- gle familyahomes etosthe southto the andsoutth- east. SURROUNDING ZONING: MHP to the northwest;otheto the north andt, south and west; R-3 ' northeast; C-1 to the northeast ' SURROUNDING PARCEL SIZE: Small typically urban residential parcels :_ to the south, southeast, hednorth�endrger :,.. multi-family p :$ northwest J` {�r� w 41� Z{r �••9:i i' it 4 ?'Tri ti_•Jy �v.� .� .-vLFt°S!5� 'tJ*.' •: fad yR?�M;,{M iyA'{k��j;pA'.,.a^".a \.,ret t >r ' Pilo No. 81-9. GENERAL FLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential (5-8 dwelling units/gross acre) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN Low Density Residential (1-4 dwelling units/ ))� DESIGNATIONigoes acre) And Medium Density Residential t (5-8 dwelling unita/gross acre) Y ' APPLICABLE POLICIES: The Medium Density Residential designation permits 5 to 8 units per gross acre. The proposed Low Density Residential designation permits 1 to 4 units per gross acre. The "panhandle" portion of ! the site is proposed to remain in the Medium Density Residential designation. The City of Chico General Plan designation for the site is Low Density Residential (1-6 units per acre), and Medium Density Residential (6-12 units per acre) for the "panhandle" portion. ZONING AND PROJECT HISTORY: The majority of the site was rezoned to R-1 on December 11, 1973 through the efforts of neighboring residents who wished to have the area develop in a manner compatible with the single family residential neighborhood. The R-3 ("panhandle") portion of the site was rezoned from A-2 An the North Chico Rezone on August 19, 1960. The original Eastwood Oaks project of 131 units was denied by the Butte County Planning Commission on July 24, 1978. The City of Chico Planning Commission voted to support that action. The pro- ject was then appealed to the Board of Supervisors, who also de- nied the project, on September 26, 1978, on the basis t:tt the project should reflect an R-1 (Low Density Residential) density. The Board requested that the project be referred back to the Plan- ning Commission for a revision and reconsideration. On October 4, 1978, the Commission sent the project back to the Subdivision Committee. The current proposal of 120 units won reviewed by the Subdivision Committee on November 12 and 26, 1980. ANALYSIS: Although the project is currently consistent with the permissible r density range of the Medium Density Residential designation, it will be inconsistent with the density limits of the Low Density Residential designation as contained in the proposed Chico Area } Plan, scheduled for a hearing before the Board e' Supervisors on March 17, 1981. The proposed Chico Area Plan is intended to ? conform with the City of Chico General Plan designation for that area which lies within the City's Sphere of Influence. The Board of Supervisors' position on the previous proposal was '. —2— a --�......r.w�+w•„�rw+.•c:+-c.-. - "1al�gi1MNM�'ER�sw�^..•.+r :. Aj �R.• �� �, .,� tii. Y ` lto 81 to'maintair'a -1' (Low Density Residential) density on the site, and requested that the project be redesigned to reflect that density.,t.The initial revis on resulted in a density of reduction frog 8.8 units/acre to 8.1 units/acre. W"'addition, the project design does not provide for a buffer area (shrub-tree landscaping) along edJacent residential parcels (without which these parcels would bo mpacted with a street in both the front and rear), does not provide recreational facili- ties designed specifically for the children who will reside in ?� the development, and doea not osition the recreational facilities in a location that is as aqual }r accessible to all residents of the development. RECOM WDATIO118 i A. Find the proposed project consistent with the permissible densities in the Medium Density Residential designation of the existing Chico Area Land Use Plan of the Butte County General Plan; and B. Find the proposed project inconsistent with the Lux Density �x• Residential designation (on the bulk of the property) as t; contained,in the proposed Chico Area Land Use Plan of the Butte County General Plan and the City of Chico General Plan; and `t. C. Find the proposed project inconsistent with the Butte County t• General Plan policies relating residential densities to traffic - carrying capacities and compatibility with ad- jacent land uses (Residential Development, Densities, C and D); and D. Find that in reaching its decision, the Planning Commission l has considered the Draft Environmental Impact Report pursuant �+ to the'California Environmental Quality Act; and X. .Recommend the developer reduce the number of units to the Lox Density,,Residential density standards (1-4 units per gross $'_V,1.. '�h,,e. �y k•4 1. y�� yy,}: r��� "� � ��'a ,����4����`�P.°\il��ci X.N�'�ik`d+..?,rr ., �..o'�•L`�.ti''��i:.Y;•l,'�"'j°1•rk.r�\;� i I S? I• .IA tY N` 4�• � Y 4 �� r� Y „V C- • Yh �' ile".Ifo. �'� � r��. ,• � , ;�° . ,�; . 4�4� i Wit^ .• ,t •lv .kY.' ` •( is J�5 1 t "d re) redia fining the project to centralise the recreation _'leoilities provide for a landscaped (shrubs and trees) ` buffer strip,between the project and adjoining residential 44 unes; and provide child-oriented recreation facilities; con- . ,t•.,w•`,�; . tinning this hearing to allow sufficient time for redesign ,�,; ,�•y��,+ . or deny the project for the reasons cited above in paragraph 4 Bend C. the Commiasion.chooses to approve the project, its action 1;�:• ; should be based upon Findings A and D (renumber to B) and C below: �'` • C. Recommend the approval of the Rezone, PA-C, 81-9, Evert, n ; (adoption of oc;dinance, draft attached) to the Board of �n. •Yj^ Supervisors subject to the following conditions: 1. . Submit road and drainage plans to the Public Works Dept. for approval, and install all the required facilities. (DPW) �C5'- ,•A 2. Provide 20 foot radius property line returns at all street ' intersections. (DPN) Indicate a 50 foot building setback line from the centerline of Tom Polk Avenue. Indicate a 20 foot building setback line from the edge of the roadway on main interior roads. :: .. (DPW) ,'. :•,, 4. Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street intersections per County requirements. Submit four alternative street names for each street to the County address coordinator for approval. (DPN) 5. Street grades and other street features shall comply with County ordinances, design resolution, and other accepted w• ' engineering standards. (DPW) 6.' Provide a permanent solution for drainage, or drainage re- a' "quirements shall be as shown on the tentative map. (DPW) OWNN„r c f Pilo Ito. 81-9 All easements of record to be shown on the final map. (DPN) S. Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with County requirements, accepted design cri%eria, and PG&E recommen- dations. Intersection lighting is to be installed as indi- cated on the development plan. (DPN) 9. All exterior lighting shall be shielded, directed, and lo- cated in such a manner as to prevent glare to adjacent properties. There shall be no overhead lighting of the recreational facilities. (ERD-EIR) 10. 1A inch AC overlay shall be placed on Tom Polk Avenue from lip of'gutter to lip of lip of gutter, from the development to East Avenue. (DPN) 11. Provide a standard driveway approach at the intersection of t the interior road and Lassen Avenue. (DPN) 12. All interior roadways are to be a minimum of 24 feet in width, 2 inch AC, 'AB with AC barrier curb. (DPN) 13. Interior roads shell be designed and constructed so as to reduce through-traffic circulation and speeds over 25 mph. (DPW) 14. The point where the interior road meets E1 Verano Way shall be used as an emergency exit only. A barrier shall be con- structed, and subject to approval by the Butte County Fire Dept." (DPW) R 15. Grading plan shall be submitted to the Public Works Dept. t` for approval, and all the required facilities shall be in- stal n- stalled. (DPW) 16. Stop signs,(exit traffic only) shall to placed at the project ' entrances to Tom Polk Avenue and Lassen Avenue. (ERD-EI8 Y 17. Storm drainage of that portion of the development located in Shasta Union Drainage Assessment Dist.(SUDAD) to drain to i the SUDAD ditch unless design calculations indicate that the portion of the development in the southeasterly part of the SUDAD district can drain north to the existing atom drain line at Lessen Avenue. (DPW) 18. Sidewalks, to County standards, shall be constructed on both sides of Tom Polk Ave. to East Ave. and on both sides of ,r project main roads. (ERD-EIR) 001) y s File No. 81-9 w 19. A deposit of $208.33 per unit developed (based upon the ultimate development of 120 units) shall be deposited with "a the County as the developers share of the cost of a future traffic signal at the intersection of Tom Palk Ave. and East Ave. (DPW) r� { 20. Construction activities shall be restricted to normal �w daylight hours, and all equipment shall be fitted with appropriate mufflers to reduce construction noise. (ERD-EIR) 21. Dust control measures such so sprinkling shall be imple- mented during construction. (ERD-EIR and DPW) ti 22. Landscaping shall be provided as indicated on the develo;- .r ment plan to achieve a visual and acoustic screen from ad- �acent residences, and maintained in a living condition.: ERD-EIR and DPW) 23. Fencing shall be provided as indicated on the development plan with the exception that the fencing shall not exceed , 42 inches in height within 50 feet of the centerline of E1 Verano Way arid within 50 feet of the centerline of Tom Polk Avenue. (DPW) y:x 1i 24. , The-6.8 acres of proposed open space shall be landscaped is indicated in the development plan, maintained in a living condition, and shall not be developed with buildings, pavement, or similar urban facilities. (ERD-EIR) 25. '-All recreational facilities shall not be open before 7 a.m. nor- after 9 p.m. (ERD-EIR) 26. Assessments shall be segregated or paid. (DPW) 27. Rine fire h;;drants are to be located as indicated by the J Butte County Fire Dept. on the development plan. The hy- drants are to be Clow Rich 950 Models or Long Beach Iron i Works 614 Models installed according to Dept. of Public Works Standard 527. Fire flow is to be 2000 GPM, sustained for a period of at least 2 hours. Facilities shall be sub- ject to Sinal inspection by the butte County Fire Dept.,and any other requirements shall be also met. (DPW and BCFD) 28. A lef`er or other documentation from the Calif. Water Service Co. stating that they are willing and able to supply domestic water to the development, and stating any prerequisites ;. which they may have, must be provided. (ENV. HEALTH) ; 29. The sewage disposal systems within the development shall meet the requirements of the County Health Department and the + � Calif. Regional Water Quality Control Board. (ENV. HEALTH) iw 47;: � �`i� qtr " ��'+'•r o,} �•;, t 4�,i,F :ylf v5't '�r .. �; '•;tiff r' i Y •e� `�A ` e`er , n 1 S + ��Y+Mi/:f • �? `,�.� , !�1 •a . 'fir ✓ 'y.'3�,t� .e ,�, ':f +;jf �f} ! Ii"r " ry ti•�x f '�� �f` Ft t' at Zl•" rte ti j 1' "`+ '� ' ,•,�'�( �� �� �:, ooj�o'jo;�To�ag� �q�sgnammoo Nr �1, s:'{'{, ♦.y��;:,, a�'1y i..'. •"�.:'4>`'.P•ri: Y0II0Q�ps���rt� '�Z�Q rt y-, "' 5 � ; 08-b-6 'tuadcoo aajasas s041A sjuso=j aoi'�taonapuo sasaoo ►�' � 74, ' ' .•`. � `�C;f+•F''ki Y,fq,�lr� .�r•�: �?"+^rr .rw�:l1 .. "" .sit•'. N ' .ii`. •y,r.iSYy'f^v.YJ (2IISYA '4Vo);`-•posjnbas.aq jtags1gaamdojaAap e :;•.:;., agq g2►osg9 tax poiaeasq ag9 io g3pTx agq,quamasaa ;ua�Pus 49JOSUTBaa s84e14 'JTTao tq pauBTsap ogNTTTxasaTgTTTdsd +" og,L 'Sb Oing uojsua4xa •oo aojesas sageaY 'rTloo tnTg y aouaps000a uj pasjnbas,sq ijags uojsuaq*cay:ujae'aagax-,y 't, �f { (gs •A1a�^ ,apsaogosauo�. ` .; Allunb s049A Tauo}8as''ijioo aqq pus 'q aQ'ggLaa�f�q�oja Mi c agq 3o xr�TAas oql oq goapgos aq pue !papjAosd4ogt,ITags 1:= amagsts TeaodsTp a90xas aqq•=o sjsdas�puo�fi aouaua�cjam ,,.;av : . b •nojgajtagsaj ogq soj sap 4agq 4oa=as8ylssauxoamog',T 4 } 7 y Yom' � .�.-1 .r ,a!•F��~+w,.�:�P!a�.�Y �� � +�' ` ` �'.:'��'�Ot' �,g>COi11iTY�� ING COMMISSION . � lSTAFH FINDINGSrREYISID) January 28,1981 . )LPpLICAtQTt,� �w �• hlrerglo Ino. (William Evert) •,•r Eastwood Oaks ". '1; OWNER some EXISTING.ZCNING: R-1 and R-3 MUESTs y Rezone to PA-C 'p. LOCATION: To the north or Tom Polk Ave., ? south of Lassen Ave., and west'of E1 Paso Ave., Chico i i, AP NO.: + 44-21-67 and 68 :SIZE: ^ •` 14.816 acres PORFOSE OVAPPLICATION: "We filed' for a rezone from R-1 and A-2 to PA-C back in 1978; project stopped, and we are ready to proceed again with rezone application." f; The applicant proposes a planned condominium development of 96;town- i house units on the 14.8acre site, at ` aA a density of-6.5 units per acre. Thera k= will be 21 two story buildings to be constructed in four phases over a four . - year period. The proposal includes w recreational facilities and common ';area/greenbelt. EXISTINd •LM USE: :vacant ','SURROUNDING LAND'USE: ,Walnut orchard to the west; Almond Grove Mobile Home Park to the north- " - west; apartments to the east; single' >: family homes to the south and south- : east. A",SURROUNDING ZONING: MHP to the northwest; R-1 to the east, '0;• south and west; R-3 to the north and northeast; 'C-1 to the northeast y SURROUNDING PARCEL SIZE: Small typically urban residential parcels r ito the south, southeast, and east; larger $ multi-family parcels to the north and northwest r � t f is ffig + 4�, C�ytrY' •ar Fla No:" GENERAL; DESIGNATION:, Medium Density Residential (5-8 dwell- ing units/gross acre) �4PROPOSED•GENERAL'PLAN Lox Density Residential (1-4 dwelling .,a. C DESIGNATIONtf., .` units/gross acre) and Medium Density Residential (5-8 dwelling units/gross acre) F. , JIPPLICABLE POLICIES:` 1Gy. i, The Medium;Density Residential designation permits 5 to 8 units M�-rwK? 'Per ggrross acres The proposed Low Density Reisdential designation • °K i ermits,lf;o 4 unite per ss acre. The "panhandle" portion of +a.�.�.•,,,i P P gross P t.�,. she site ie,proposed to remain in the Medium Density Residential .9� designationi".:Rhe Land Use Element encourages the provision of " diverse housing types within the density ranges permissable densi'.'Y for each land-use designation. The City of Chico General Plan designation for the site is Low f• "!'� Densi Residential (1-6 units per acre), and Medium Density .�: .; '� ;tReaideatial •units per acr ) for the "panhandle" portin. „1,'ZONING,ANDS'PROJECT HISTORY: The majority,of.,the site was rezoned to R-1 on December 11, 1973 ethrough,the efforts of neighboring residents who wished to have he area'develop in a manner compatible with the single family residentiatneighborhood. The R-3 ("panhandle") portion of the .;site was.•,rezoned.from A-2 in the North Chico Rezone on August .19, r,,,'• 1980. TheIorigiusT Eastwood Oaks project of 131 unite was denied by the q.,,._• 'Butte County Plenning Commission on July 24, 1978. The City of V Chico Planning Commission voted to support that action. The pro- -appealed sect i►as:then-appealed to the Board of Supervisors, who also de- "" • f'nied the'•project,. on September 26, 1978, on the basis that the ' ;`',!, •:),.'project.should reflect an;R-1 (Low Density Residential) density. ... The Board,requested.that the project be referred back to the Plan- s;;. . „_ning Commission for a revision and reconsideration. On October 4, -','1978, the•.Commission sent the project back to the Subdivision ' ”?Committee:„.-A proposal of 120 units was reviewed by the Subdivision 'Committee-on November 12 and 26, 1980. The Planning Commission ,",held a hearing on this proposal concluding that the project in �} :.., ,its present'•form was too dense to meet the policies of the General 'Plan and expressed concern over the project's design. Rather than rte -Ideny the project, the Commission advised the applicant to prepare several -alternative designs for site. The present project reflects a continuing dialogue between the developer, Planning Staff and Planning Commission. -tli�.��1r F�•n..... y.-. s.ici`tx.�i.i�:�.�ln: t .. +.v�+fifi}r�T - • X. � r �• �S !�f v'' � }. �_•'.+..� -y _.� w..'t_y .,;�aYd,�'r�F- � Tp � ,:�9 Vs K,ANALYSIS t As the Commission is�aware',,the Planning Department has recommended 1denial of the original proposal based on excessive overall density in relation to General Plan. In addition, , the Department advocated ;a re-design of the profect.to provide for an extension of Tom Polk from East to Lassen. This alternative, as pointed out, would reduce wt.'•�, ".the tr trio impacts of the project also providing a needed collector zr, ;;"�^cA•;;.,�,;sEreot e�iven the continuing development north of Lessen an 1 the ab- once of an effective collector street. The proposed on-ramp at Lassen Avenue due to financial constraints is virtually an impossi:' `ability, thus, this project represents the only possible means of ;reconciling additional growth and development of the property and s, areas north of Lassen with the necessary circulation system com- .'; ponents., a ,�. In theprocess of,considering other development alternatives follow- ing a discussion of the original proposal, the Commission offered some direction to the developer as a "sense of the Commission". These design parameters included a reduction of density to an over- all average of around six dwellings per acre and inclusion of a "convertible" road/right-of-way which would facilitate the conver- sion onveysion from private to public the northerly extension of Tom Polk when necessary in the opinion of the Director of Public Works. In addition, there was considerable discussion of other traffic sen- sitive design such as access of the eastern portion to El varano, no access strips, etc. The applicant has revised the proposed project to meet some of;these concerns. As submitted the project would achieve an overall density of 6.5 dwellings per acre while maintaining a private street. With regard to the density, the Planning Department would find the pro- ject consistent with the General Plan both existing and proposed. The overall density represents a reasonable combination of the dual designation carried on the property particularly in view of its location within the City of Chico's sphere of influence. Approval ;:-.-of the project as presently constituted for all practical purposes, t irrevocably precludes the development of a ppublic through street in �. this area where one.'in this area where one is clearly needed. If th8"...—5g'Cditt btoh-i:hboses"to"do"so;',a•'favorable' recommendMOM-- '4— It: on the.project is advised. However, if the Commission as previously expressed and as recommended by the Planning Department is concerned about the potential for a mature public street,the specific project e ' revision is recommended. , y�w��_ The design problem involves a reconciliation of two seemingly ir- reconcilable objectives - the provision of a high volume through street and high quality, low impact residential development. Stra- tegically this can be accomplished by reducing the number of en- croachments from the project to the extension of Tom Polk while arranging the dwellings in groups oriented away from the street. In this regard, the Planning Department would recommend the following specific re-design considerations: 1) require an'underlying offer of dedication of a 60 foot right- y•. �� Mj• ,� ,, }`4Ra I !� ax !'0 3a northerly,ext.04 sue on^;or Tom Polk (note: less than 60' set"'available+•in>,ths,nort h additional right-of-way can ,• �e obta-ned 'lrom•adjoining property); and inbtall, rci'owned twoUane roadway in lieu of the inverted 24 i.fo(ot road'section,as proposed; and grbnC,•a•_one'foot wide no access strip along the easteru side 141r�•`L� i of,the northerly extension of Tom Polk to control encroachments from adjoining property and within project; and 1;4) eliminate on-street parking bays in favor of a centralized over- � flowiparking area; and +r 5) ' Provide access to units 60 through 69 from E1 Varano, closing !., • 1,�• ,. access to Tom Polk except for emergency purposes and provide e tura•, around; and •h,�� `'.-6) ire-arrange units 38 through 59 into a single access court which eliminates two offset street intersections in favor of a single }'•', right angle intersection without an offset; and ']) • delete units 70, 75, 80, 86 and 92 located in conflict with the ,60f`foot right-of-way in favor of their inclusion with the blocks west+of..7bm_Polk containing units 1 through 24; and z : •�.: �• r c';�ir, . ""8),f irelocatethe Mock containing unite 25 through 30 westerly to •'eliminatelthe conflict with the right-of-way maintaining a ten ... ;;�foot�tetback.to the westerly property line or alternately relo- z+�? •�-Fx !;cating unit',30 to the block containing units 66 through 69• The Planning Department believes'the project with these suggested F changestwould'represent a reasonable approach to accomodating the y• interests of the developer, future residents and the neighborhood generally `•The Commission may wish to include sound attenuating walls and other..off-site' features described in the previous report. A r'edeaiga of the site plan will require commensurate revisions .'of theFlsndscaping, facilities and other associated plans. If ,_'"^.'-'r:?'.:••apecillcaTly a ge�"'i'�"tih8"proposed"'82Ce"'�n ere recon- "•• ;'� mended,by the Commission they should be reflected in the plan and ' reviewed by the Commission before being sent to the Board. An addendum to the EIR describing the through street alternative, } ;� : �� substitution of a physical barrier for time limitations for the re- creatien area ans provision of a sidewalk on one side of the street is being transmitted by ERD to the Commission under separate cover. -4- t $•^_ r � _ti!1jj�'�'�` tit l�`� .s�V�ik" lyr ..t': •, .: �T�?.,k'�R y ..�IC k{ .�,it,,,k`''{�+'i2,( 5 , pun tgoV 4TLenb T.84uamn0sU►U3 'a:UJo3TvGa6i koq gnana,md.r`,- {, a osdd9 jo euo 2Tpuoa o4uT p94vaodxoouTega9dm 001190 OSTO agg 00npas og PaPaau`90,ma90o-ao 4aaTgTo;BarP`'� T a njouTgsodeg gondol j9guaouosTnug'y=vsQ eqg poaapTauo?),aatt �tbM1u S,. nojaaTmmoO 9nTan9jd eqg 'uojaTaOpaT 8njga9as"nTsgaVPIIT�I ,'Q LoiOt%`�n'�S°p'1'k:I,�uno 0q4 g4jx 4ua4eT9u00 400g'oad Buluosea D-Yd.POaodatd lipy,pnTd •y ,��,�,. �a qg og gaa qna a =(D uT Peuj9gaoaiti8 OT41 U00 a F ) MoL q 0 Pug S Y �TPuTS pug 7Ssga'?tq`� puq=008t. c: 99 ueld 4u9mdojanap aqg uT auojgTAea aqg og•.gaargna-F'4o0 osd;egq.jo i ?; j9nosdd9 aqg pllaomo0es og gueguT jo no;goo 9 ;,dop9 aoja9Tmmo0'ogy �a �4 l y�l-ti- s 1},jnlr ' ,/��fp/���'#���}��A►F/�.:{t,'+aI 41,41 N(.•,F ``t,h,in".. y.1' y.:• ,�. �'- � ��,.►•7,'--'��.. teaie�l t a tii Soaid Of, Supervisors adopt an Ordinance rezoning ` the subject property from R-1, R-3 to PA-C (81-9, Evert) subject Yf oilow Yag..conditions r 1..''Offef.foi',dedication a 60 foot right-of-way for the northerly r. �•;` extension of Tom Polk through the property from the southern property cline to Lassen. -, ;. .� ` 2. The northerly extension of Tom Polk Avenue shall be developed * to Butte County standard RS-2A as per the Butte County Departwent � . of Public Works memorandum of 1-27-51. 3. Submit road and drainage plans to the Public Works Dept. for approval, and install all the required facilities. (DPW) 4. Provide 20 foot radius property line returns at all street Intersections. (DPW) s`Y S. Indicate a SO foot building setback line from the centerline of �. Tom Polk Avenue. Indicate a 20 foot building setback line from the edge of the roadway on main interior roads. (DPW) 6; Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street intersections per County requirements. Submit four alternative street names for each street to the County address coordinator +. ' for approval. (DPW) � .` 7. Street grades and other street features shall comply with engineering standards. (DPW) +.. B.. Provide a permanent solution for drainage, or drainage re• ? " fi requirements shall be as shown on the tentative map. (DPW) 9.' All"easements of record to be shown on the final sap. (DPW) 10., Street'41khiiag shall be provided in accordance with County requirements, accepted design criteria, and PG42 recommendations.` intersection lighting is to be installed as indicated on the development.�plan. (DPW) All'�exterior lighting shall be shielded, directed, and located 1n such a manner as to prevent glare to adjacent properties. •,• (ERD-BIRj +�=* 12. A 0.10 foot AC overlay shall be place on Tos Polk Avenue from ' lip of gutter to lip of gutter, from the development to East Avenue. 13. Provide a standard driveway approach at the intersection of the northerly extension of Tom Polk Avenue. 14. All interior roadways are to be a minimum of 24 feet in width, 2 inch AC, AB with AC barrier curb. (DPW) i ti4 y 44r -C.- s} C H R r ,pt. Vt�l'i} r ) •TM��OIM>11�Nfl Q �� Wit+• !lINGEL`a Aa80dATM"a t � "' a *,y ?'h� Nt18UL71NG CML ENGINEERS 9ebmary 20 1901..Yy �.VM�►vr ^a N kvt ` kJCNS board of.supervisomiy .0rovillot CalifornW,9S96S at '' ''" s. •,r RES RastwOed r ONNERS William,avert', Clerk of tha board of Supervisorse I would like to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission of January 2e;!-, 1981. 1 am appealing the denial %01• of the Eastwood Oaks Project and would like this project to �. be heard, at the,February 17th, 1981 meeting. I do believe this gives enough time for publication, etc. Thank you, ti EL i 71SS INC. uesell ger nt` S �t }�Cw Flonntng Calm a yi Oros. + ` �ri�r;��; ,�� )�� +?!•<<. `'>Ri�" :.{Nit• r� ,� .,. ••Tewf Tfsvaloosfm ix .93m.:qa Pe: MUM TY200muT•sf 93w3t so 63W L3Tr"b Ts=om&rp f ft»o"M so ' PTA son,, s'f pno idw meq faT.wq » PsTMT .mo wet aloft& anfs= TsasssaosTaas TsaTJ sgs 6340ds2 3atdtf TnuamwUms 3;ssp s43 ca Pwgawa3w atsq tog Pe3sssmoa eq& »Taatft oTTgsd Pts saoj.3*rTn*f20 •ssosstd'eg3 To 32n f 3tg3 Pm a:Odes 3atdsT Ts30SUAQXTss 3r2P sg3;0a,P67j?s33s,Pat ptssdssd ' seeq eesg 93wemm0a sq3 Lq PWTss wmod Tsaae®osTaas ="MIdTs 03 »ssodees we3aTu 3sga •32ofts 3aef ; Tsam►mOsTdat, 3tssp sgs 03 pegat33s meq sssg aTTgnd sgs sot; swT3wpswmoas2 pm.ss4 3sg3 faT"u � Tasasstr sosT&ssda =�� sft•faswottoj sqa 'psTsssa pts • t wpm*" •=TOG asw;&swd9j.i ooTaoss0 j# • sat& f •aaerosd sqa =o L3TMP op 13Tt�pse.�ta wa L. Pns Tod RATA were"fp'psssoddoa Tsassf1'3os'i2*ftf • - .. � •, r•i.aJ• p Sf fwatLs.dwsss0 at pTao� :�• . sngesd Op 03 o"anos woof •» a33TOMmA omplum q,LdbQ,.fq PV". sgf •soas3 pas »ssn1 comasq ptwoTTf attq om q atga sappervap sga Lq psandsn sn g3aos pas g3s0s $a;= s»tgosd 9g3mT9pvU.,•sastgosd SIP 03 UOT241e9 TTsss&o•wgs ea Sass:3pssoa Ams.fsTsopatgwips-s'aI sqe 3aw(e4d •r ' a' I p3 03 Inn2ft Lf :•LaTssep aT P MUPss.sow sat(0sd.TssTlTso OU •wets ^, s 'r, sTga sT poogsogqlTea sq3 Lq LsTsssp sga•ao spm•ssTmosfmoa 0g3 pt3soddas +; sgz •LtX end Ti so mlgosd sg3 onto$ Som pTw&eaaenp XToa VAZ asdo os •Mlgold ou"23 s m Alit end .13 asga zTej unca'awl"sd0f^x ;T •stss M sT esop Lpa3s OT;;ssa asg3oas,sniq pas ops issw alga j tpsodosd wq3 Leasaas pts »33Ts�a aT=Psa t waaaT3ssi os soTssTmswd "RPTa" sqs •pssosdds WT 400 road up iT asg3 pgn,egg•.•.spoogsogg2pu ' faTpm elms sqa 3ataq TTTA aaq•sssv gtod aoZ aatdus Ltso 3os TTIA #M R. •PntdPT3ss eq PTMA Psos gaaosga f 3sg3 pt03 asst wtdoed sqZ. Uxv wq3 aT soTaopMo aTiissa jo ssaedaf sopor; wets& Tgs3Tabs { t PTsot isg3 soTsatos s if�t i-^�•`; as pm; 03 west So aT stdoed wg3 g37t wm Pas soT3sa3Ts sgs ssespps 03 3==Tsmw f spm nq *%= ma .•wt&o %M,aT•satgesd Sip f ;ATos aoa gupans sT ST pus vast pe ;u= f oaaT,aaad faTsq L3Tsswp On !�•. io L3Wposd wqa jo ssasasq aoerosd wq3 3saTt2s scot o3 Inal wtt sqf •aairosd sgs ssoddas zoo ptsaa TMs sqs pe3sas:awtswy0'aos;as�da�.• + . ..• '.u• ,rt :.� •1:.�:`Y.r•,,.:.f!,> f ML �t�i���° 4.�5}, Lt°°�wr '1...a,r�- , .. S t , !� • R !h est o asst' e ;,5 e. oft o3Tq� 49 PUS l9-TZ-ri r ATTTassPT,�. A i T1 i Pwe � •con" io Qame •wassq vod aoi'f0 Wm'Ps3ta0t1 f(&sawaTa•wsss >!.Ir.r Vs« 03 (TsT3sspps3•L3';S=P ATM;, ' -elms) oT-11«' ?'mots& "Tssp; 0-Tweddf,pas,�UOUX43a*dsf:T�'a�si�y r l k a;w son !ot0•&ssy/issy asTTiTl1 ao fafs*sg'aTT posit" wqz 'l_A.•Al r-'�' ..+'��at�� ,>?° ��,, �••Q9-!•L9•tL•1!:i11r•�1�; �, !!OSIT •'' ' 9'd0 if3ll'QlAr f�i nrm410 Z=8olYW3dvmm ms d0 ms=curin ,h sr,Yi jycaaa�cd •(wasaw-im alIIm ^w744 czj(7n72IYmm Zt am m=o'ai 1« ' tT fi '.+,. c M (ZRGI ZTIiIIdpT�1IIS)�«T•1[„ It00td fliOZIIi a2i1Ed d0 'Riddr_QfT Y2i +: '`". ler 1,5c VW ta�.�+:r1A7r',`t•I+RR•y �.iv1 ,G. •»,i: '� •r r , , t.y �" Y < r..r,. �«w.v.•aOvaTJfOsp wsssP•sos st'aasdss taTQ�,p� T�i�r� � � �� � r �-sepo0g3ogRlps tviaaspisea LTT�J-Rlais 3nsatrPt x,:, �� r'� APTA 0073moarbom saT3epss �gssre;a,!s�v43ss 3.�tTv o!TO� :r �'. saiptTeq,ssaeeas pw sands vsdo,Ososso {e OOpaa s �• PO sTgi mti tsssorJ o3� fo L3A mr tvp0spisss �tT+QJ-st�%Ta sOJ,PsiJTasds!s»ssd s: .., s370a ! m 03 riot sT qvj seep 3serosd nvssno sq3 aglsos Ton y1 o3,tR daTMP.0gi'10.y' ?� F papas g3T"SIUSIP .OtdT3tao EM 901; 3933"vq3 Om patt,vsas p0ssat�4 •3assd0 O L3nsw ao y on pw1 an s TwP J 3ai P i+�P ptss�s�a� f,... �. . Y� . 'sop�agis3eiP,soiastado� iNsPws sq3 Ositw►10 si POaJiRs N Nss fowp +Oq. poo INU3M t�aesws tss3Noomen carp Na NMT&. 4 �: salty o"s "epee L3i3sdn Tome saw 'auninalli ponsp am r= aved" am •(Toms "Puaswa 4r) tsaot 043 " SIP niasJ t0agao !s"I It OngOd t so Lnsiasdss •spoor" scum onga3 pMT!"n, 'C . o"ggv •t =31 aim PsoTi300 noma vp so; 3002 MITs pysP aeO.W$ 3avdsT rTRi, •ep=vvvq OTJJ*;3 p's��i Maano� •_ •aOvaiJTWTe Pump aaa an wands OTJJvsa •twee m sanays"To psaoia0s. .t et.j n AT=w asad sq3 Jo sorest =gzni Pat 'seri"imm"n' so sa0oq as" lea=p NT04 ooi =OR3Te Jo L3ptdea ��? { laTLsira aiiAs3 sq3 peomm a00 np► aasr0:d rM MUJ OTJiosa *me pas 'a3sCoad &M J0 LtaaepwdepaT Devise ' + poon2owTvs on al wz2ud Cup" mp ems 'T*AOsdde 3"re" J0 UmTPOOa s opva sq nfw wmr-seseaaia+r,+ ><i0i �t/Oaae���3sR sR3 as t>dTe OTJTw • pssn0q o� Via;;�.�•, �.�sr.�: , -. AipwPpOP pot0Ap"IPT" aas(oad""3Pe eqa tq sssssp s s3 peasspis on& "avast snu •"asdss OsToa aTJA23 Pae Lgv0/ s" PeavTOOM QsTs 'o0poomm Pesyssao= stgise0d ro.ojisiJW ISPatOai 11473790d"P =TORS Pas r30odoi OTJi00ds "orkmd" aootend Js ="%Tpm " Psgmas sg,tna tesmm NOiarsTaio p stesaeq gmosp" M so OaasJis < 3 ` sri3vi+rn0 3oseiJf�TP Nf 3TaMs,oa.pesasds aos, a•' . tMs ww dsY?a'if �tt0i, �.is9�s pc: � -� 4 hy,.. � ,-r -. 't�k a�':,:.. � tir•,..- y, J"��fiC y4w- ,i9+URS.1 ` � r�1i •�Z.+. Y "�'S Sx Ly -a(� p.,r'1�� -v�F•�✓,y.�r abriealt1V%U7 P e�etive iaod t s,taeentiva"vatwe'"lhis project Is ausroaadad b7farbaa doveea lopmatIs vhich;haw already dhinishad T the�agriculturiLL"Viabilityfif the area. Siaee the QancrahPlan`opolespace glsmeat oo17 tale for ar GaA* praariatioae! agrienitural areas outside designated f, urban areas" t1deimpact is not daemad significant. s 6: �Ovaseovesiag o! laa2,044"'6d increased draltage. laductiom,of,vatar quality !a drainage runoff. ",nraiaaga'ebsttala.thich vi11 receive the "noff ' �• have auffideat'tapac1t7i'end the qualit7 of surface �• �r`Y';; ! ' j twoff via"be,no•different,from urban runoff from t snrsouadiagfdenlepedFaraas4tu" impact is in- iignifitant MSMURi 2aetwedi g Tbta lmptet was seduced �' by &1xedei1p7iWTs1ocai1on of the recreation area,. �;• -� mad;b>'tehePiaelnsion'o!!dpigation measures related to a; d °, sontd sand�visualbarriers'and $btaldiag for light$..' `+ lhasasattttationsl`aseitojbe aide conditions of project "`so thaA 121 acts ase doomed insignificant. r'r • ±a - ,� ' i7'7•[f{�''•'�"" d i 'tet'..' j�. , 13I'" ti not aP ita117_saationad are dammed a_ � `i�.' tasignifiesnt 1,0,ti y ,,,:, .}_ '..r hf'°�� �• ` ' ��j� tesene� ieb,b oaitateat with all alanines el�.tha Futter q'Csoaral Plan:'' '�` a *fig ` s te:aae> roe l �sia=1`a-tiatl7 residential) and "it 1" Goadiva�daasit; sasidimtiil)".to-*PA-C" Lplannad area-a':+stas).-propsst7 3 Y! loeatsd.nosth of Toi=Polls Avmna,-south of Leen Avaaae and vat of El 1, P "antifled`as AP 44-21-67 and 68, Chico was approved, subject to,tha•folloving,coaditioasi ordinance 2196 vas adopted and the Chairwa 4'F aYthOriiad,to,Signt ' X04 Submit ME'iad draina;a plans to the Public Norks Department for ;y �approral,;and,install. all the required facilities- 11 tl acilities.2.t 20 toot;sadia$ property lima returns at all stsaae intersections. cita a';30.tooL bidlding'setback line item the eentarlina of Tor ; k' +� �;8olktijii Xudicate a 20 foot building setback lite from the edge of Jthettrsdaa7iot nein interior toads. ' <VL ;• vy .aftoRON$goo s go p o tded'by the developer at au street inter- , ' aectiens,,per1CMMa requirements.-_ Submit four alternative street g-1 unman lorleieh°street to the Quay address coordinator for approval. •1 ofr ia«t tostosof ,ball eotply ritb 0=4" wit* y} �'�� ,1 ��, �''�' F xnS � •Sir i!i lk"' icy......•.... •-+...xr�w.".....��•-.."....-. tt �. \ •j•M3 w 'n • '� b' ,a + q,•e,�j^��'R� G�� .-d }o+� ..P `�,-�4pw'� ,�,iyR,SP1 �,, r .j L_ :1°"ti �r :�, �:. �Fi7s•4' ���� ;�• •J h �' 1f g F�7 1���r �. w17 .L�,i�p ' .y _ P 7y ,, {• r: v VSs g. q 8- f� II li r a �r9 ,/��; '�. Vit•, � t,j� .6�t r 3 ,; 3 , �� "� ''R'�•" ���`,� 4 xa, �., 4G u ° � Y: t.p ,�J 1..i •` ri ..�, R �} a` �"S 'rS�1 sK')^. o � 'cr9 J�'r�.P t]},°. .` _ - ... ,t�a.L�{.�."�. "�•'�s.�iY' ��,I���' �ft`� '�^Ytfj�J._;; �� 'vN"'s�,� �r':`' t LXvs. 4' ,�o y_�° t ♦ :r ' ♦� �`��� �� t f��i, r '�t,�!•, a ���t gx r� �'"�u•..1�.-.-d,'°o .•v9�. b �. '} .-... ,.,,. ._ ti� �"r!Y•;.+�..� ...� 'th{�YQ'r^f�:i�!n R';�f � ~ K5� h . v �-"�+�(,¢ .... . ............•-� i. W r�.T, aS i•C'r :!1.,?�'' v� �,` 51..i, x', �„ o a�- o �..• ._.:......�. -•- .a• � .; , ,,, ': 1:<t.^':' C.:�9911�i4�.9@?Qia� ��.":`:!."�Z�jw,'w t Iy a�° O 90 commV1 <s2 ;o ";avpunoq L:=dud 2UOV oma; Og3 p9jgsq'mit ,a i 89jdtc3opnOt 9 vq%zor. a9v,3 p" pvzm=a=,0q 2039a; zoo; uo"o � •� r ; � u •=Td.39toduromp Ogi so IAORG pD&ToAop pub 3TOgd0* ;o p03on23oow 0q TT9g0.3a0(o:d=og3_03,Tmao34T C) s 'a a Tvauo o�aa� a iog3o TTy 'o �p 3esII P= Ono 330�oid oqa =o tis 74 r ° •"s' L12og340o mp so0woq onmAy Iffoi tact ;0 Clio.3"A 0%3.1�0 P3pj�?Ad xoq rMo 'Opi0 ms ca=w3 o3 P03o0s3=M:XTOaOpjo,tiiji,iio.¢1 'QT }, . ` k `rJ'r, y ' . Sx <`9 j• •On9D•V 90000'] 39 Mn 9j02P 62030 Q.Tf30jsD M " fids r og3 03 RUM Rj92P wo 3272367P Gyms Dip ;O u0d krzozo0O4wWa pg3,in �0 d z� %=ZdOT0p Og3 ;o UnUOd Dg3 3943 03Oo M woj3DTwT0i ffijQp,pa-L� { 1PaTP avol Og3 03 WPZP 03 (ams) 33723VT4 32 ` a?a 930DgQ Dj pa300oT 3tnadap"p 010 IO 9oTa ud 3943 E_o%�- : ttso�g w��t ��x•, S �.i ' ,' ' 4X4 c . 4' 4 �•, r *==AV X1OM PIR On=&V jMoj txj at C==UM 't+ Sao osd 30 a d o a o• rr. �.a `..r. °Q3 W DT D4 TTD9 (LIDO: jsiu3�ii�?�ADIS�j d03P' 9T r�` •� �,,;�' r'a��r���' ° � r. �� �: }�r ue�+. .. � .:xs•,:,:: �;^:';;rx i.i ...[�.Ks$ �'3d�'`3!q`�+�a►w,:ty�r Y * f��,'k4' ��n� � s� < �'try 'POTT43wj Dq T MO Qo 141,L WD;'Pa ;M-TT4OW''TO41d9 20 o a 03 33 e0 0 ; 3 t9doP D b jTgOE DV3 P3 jOgOO 9;T M. S11 }� �` •' ',�� � , tG .trwni4tt3l .T a �: s. .,_ . a9otr=ft Onl L3D� Dung op �q T�osd�r 03 3ao�a0o Y _ ~` {;' t r.s 'POummaa 02 T mo anuaq V •ITnO 3PW taaoti = tt0'90 Poat t �t sti, °l �t d o o40go Lttg aa0200•n•D30ea p9oi`iojso3tR:Dgi�Dsotjpo+da�jDtjL,':::.tT .. `F",$�t� °° { ��� �''''e' � +t.. !s ern '"'':,3�.oMT•5"�1�CSY.,/t'�'`�.��Y1�V)•�S.�i.�'7r�'�1d �t+vS!lt'.+�'1.`1+y.�'� �.,�? G, sl '��,c` � 0:. 7 f +rx xtir� ' r v.3, f' 'ate fL 20no•DpaodO Pao>,oj3Dna2ja+aj;;Osy.�natg3 a: t• � ',' � �,t�°,' { " ' ' s• OanPai o3 90 co pnaoutwo;poo•V*O;wp,Da TM` i � '' y�N^.;°O l,•, - �' � :0.}�y� .bpt-� :��' ���r`pN{.r���t'iii.. rry�l(t: t�� t� �Z'}!• 7 Q��'�'�e e"' 1 �t v ,�= `� MSn. 'r, ,s:}..: ,A..b.'dt• i41''..9:1 Lj. ` i ° < xIt 4 G i R3TA.8R i.7v.Q�f Z s +;!• � 1 •g3PTA nT 300; ti ;O mem 9 oq 03 029 CAUP02 aojsoz y •r. �� .r, '}�s.�l 'r�' '••�� y 'r,• �{ 7r � y f+� }��a;,:�' ++t 4 ;� n� �, .. .. . I.,.f u _:•oaao,apazoo90Z,pao Pvo,;'soTio3n=t�:t � ,�Z � �;;,,s �{�� op ;o tiojuoa2939j ap v aa="ft &m&w "VP Da tp {a'�T '�� '" •t n a a, h •onOoiO 3OOI 03 ==doToWp 0* mi;'^li033n3 ;O dT do c us oam 4TOa mi 9o'Pow" Da-Trw;&y_T* WN 00° >s k rr •Wj320d02d 3DO09WVj 03'029TH'3t�sl►Did:03'DD;,�oaQC3eQyQ0O0- 'MFS .� ,: 4," , ��r°v � x�y;� 1�• r� Qf W��T W3 �p3�D��P��:�'�3's�C�I�, ± �� ti .t -�`'s� '� 3aoDdo=O�oP'DIP 90 P0367paf co O4 Di;Df� y7'r F.. : �r' OOj3a00203aj •a90j30PtIC:�oa02 rm PaO i}9j2Osj2?.�jOOP t?33d0aao w r} 2 3 9090 Sa309 d 89 ij�t'' 8 6 ssCnT° 3 r' g f!�j:; , dd� D39oo:oSjttDo L39n0,j R 7A P nj, MPj� YTS j3 OD a2;; � <,. d•', �. 'Atm '.l's�� '. a'�*`�-,Y , �y ��.� i ° v , � '; •dOa T09'f; OZijiSO`Lg�P.o>tD�Oq�i.43.i, �iS` '"'� � •r 1 '��a -�''x �P-� � �`�,� ,�, ' ' �—��dOo OAj3D31i0�•Dtj3 OO;tiAOgD't00 Oq,TTtrgO. w �, i �t,. ,i�� o- D39Casja�l2'D89ajD2P{i0 'Oa1t�P1iV 303 C?i�n�oo_,jjrk� 9 'y�rV,'%� a 7v .-�• v ' ''y[ r "�' v o _f.' Q .+�v «. a!'w?kR{!i4+ rt Lse t`�Y�I°M1.,t., l k s q i, }! r Ilk .;. \ J �,•yY .l r, .. v'f1 ap" °O o, '�' v-'k� ';:1 'y .,�'f q� . �JC ;`,lr ., �, ^'" �k4,;6: �$; �3r Str�4. d- � ,y �"•.i � .rmfid,- ��•E,'tr 'r�jJ '°Y•.a ; y. 7 Ck i (i^• i« °'%G''!i a fY.,,Y•.':w.,:w..,::..�s+•wra+w'MIr"'A"Yv.�',K6a.r4�.�tl�. +tom+ , -_, ':f: :V�SLy� t, 1. Fj i114�W 4TOsgt a:mTsg3 W!,moi;�'o±TeQ ssaf�do=,�t� s@ w a •POA"ddl in dm rm; sio;.q',sa=SstfP � "• t.•;, ,• 2DM6 oaTg3 3MI:p a Mp Sol PPTjo;d 3 R m gq:;TyT';!!IVUL,-'*U •psslabss sq TMv 3asmdopasP sq3 gaUiZR3'Lm►pOT"m M. f=,; is g3PTa sqx 3asmssso m pas 4ssOssT9aq ss3sn 1TasolTm Aq POW46op F` sq TTIA ssT3TTTas3 sgi •tT sTaY aofsssasz Lasdma3 saTaSsS Z•arn'.t *Tu2o3TTs� g3Ta saalpaoaaf 4T posTabsa oq rMs =Tsassss.T;v%3031r T MA. *' • Yt r. pasoQ joasao� �TT*aa sssra T*aoT=R��sTu�3TTq'>.., '�' �•.. r9 D y� og3 Pus aasmandsQ gam Lamoo m io Msjsa= M,;,03 Sal�gns r'• ? • • ado s 2=22Ls Owoo o.,xpdss ,°f ; • , 5 4 Pus PsPTda q TT*g T*sodsTP 'q3 l Pus•,��,. U� 'ramm"ap '=;3wt'nrmT op Sol "PTaoad amp zoomeasa sasaoosmoq T.,,•R i,"'.4 •pslot IMM3 437Tsnb mmik Tsa00n.x+ t, sTa=on"m OP For sasmaXAK g3TM A=000mq3 30 13=wxp b03 i sq3 2m TMO sasmdotoaop oq3 UMIA 8=39" TssodM,'sSws TU t'•SZ .,tis• pspTd'at 3200 ;am% Aso. .,, ,,,,n i Lsg3 irTga swaTMbsssad An SUPT 1 pow 03usmdojsasp M',03 51394 *13*owp djddus ca sTgs Pu* tn=';;►on bip 3M %nms'A*d�J I oaTasoS 2131RA VT=J L sqa =4 =T3s3=Q=op Svq:w,so 2023*1 �1,%yl4 ' ,. +tr•".^:J�'.' .-•+. ��4'..,, ,M. '•dta ,.. �?.. ,.�� •ism oats sq Tme s3asmaiTe►bii 2sgao An pas'�r s " • . ; •3usm32sd94 oaTi 63ano3 saanl sq3 Lq ao;3asdwT TM; o3.3asrgns sq } ,TTsgs.99'PTTTasi •SMq 9,38sst 31 to POM4 1 sol PvUMao8k6 ® OOOZ:k ' ., ,*' oq ca 1T Mori s2g'••LtlS P�3S wpon aTTgnd io 3mmszsdsQ o3'�° 1 t r 2npsaaas Pormsaf rppc i tit vws:uosl wV92 swn 'ao fiTPCR OWtA. }.. q*U•oT3 0q o3 on sausspLq Oq='• •awjdasa®dotoasp„Ogs'ao 3asmsasdsQFR r ssg L3ano3 scans wp A Ps3sow” m pamoj s4 93:021 im-UPtq OSTj.4r•9Z p0390DA89tsq Tt*gs1nas MBIT •tt ' • ., •i -,. •sassy o swum • our ' ' T'Rod sns is saTj �l • ' „}sof Oi smia j+ai'bt'sasay' M;i sitTjis3as1,sg3'Ygaissl,^OC sT43* '�i.�, , 3gsTsq uT ssIIaut Zt'Pw/axi�3ott jjsgs•laTausjtsga�31g3%�ooTsdPaxs. �', .`� w v. ' R3Tw.a*Td ' _'Jn.:6F! .. •. swdo �•idt�..p9J.•A�Srii.'*•LtrraS�;��,. � fit g3aopsisaTasw.PsPT� ii�a ,it , •�•. ,:, •: caul'� . a nE,; }J'`'�:sOpTPm >�Tt^fsR.nPsnT+3uTAsti,: � ��'; �c' pw''•/sasspTa2�3ans�pl Mal w13a1 aT3faoas,Pw,tss/p►.f:faOTgafd �' , 03 and 30ssdojOaOP Oq3 so.'romIM a:POPTaoi4,sgIUWg1 la ."I •� ,5;�` : . • . � F.r:,,s;•,,� ..;.g :-��•�t:���nxye•:;o+r�{��lsotao!wsoos a: .bks r,r luTSsP P03sOmsjdeT sQiTTsgs SaTjgaTad/•,a:WOO �js23aw`3 „�. .. .A..•L_.a 3�:,C-�:Y _ �i�4 eOT.O� 'if. .a�i. .1 ;- •OsToa soT3ana3ssW,saapo2 03'rti f sa Ups sansdoadds g3Ta PO33Tl sq jjsgs 3=edTabO rn a ` 3R=TTL*P jleiw o3 pozou32 sq Una ssf3TSrtS3i: },� t3as►i�3�1i�� �'k {., it �:ina:• :1'°i�{!,f'r"a.i4�?•�tgti9.�� '1Y�y}•fvHw�:i��'" +� Z�. ,• 'sh�kcns9sST is*S Pa1,:0no3ey,��o�sFo ,', ;�. .io 09133112:317 iq3 31 j1a"I 1111123 iin3nl 1 10.310a.ig3 l0 iilgt t rx: k:`,zodoTsl p Sip @943=00 so � �Ta'1gZ f•M• Oe�000•CU' :a4 fir.. Ts3 'N/N 470.014) x •r. ,q YVYl/rI:•,,1•I+il•It)r%YMf.• COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST APPLICATION: Feeney Engineering DATE: March 3, 1999 County Offices and Cities: Chief Administrative Officer V X_ Develop.Services Director ✓_X Public Works Director ✓ X_ Environmental Health _ Assessor Building Manager Sheriff BCAG ALUC LAFCo APCD Butte Co.Farm Bureau Biggs _ Gridley Chico Oroville _ Paradise _ Chico Airport Commission Animal Control Irrigation District: Butte Water _ Biggs/W.Gridley Water _ Durham Irrigation OWID _ Paradise Irrigation _ Richvale Irrigation Table Mountain Irrigation _ Thermalito Irrigation _ Other Domestic Water _ Butte Water District _ California Water Service Co. _ Del Oro Water Co. OWID _ Thermalito Irrigation District _ Other Sewer Butte Water District _ Themalito Irrigation _ Sterling City Sewer Main Skansen Subdivision(CSA 21) _ L.O.A.PUD Fire Protection California Department of Forestry _ El Medio Fire Protection District Recreation Districts Chico Area Recreation _ Durham Area Recreation _ Feather River Rec.&Park Paradise Recreation&Park Richvale Recreation &Parks Utilities Vi PG&E North-Chico _ Chambers Cable TV Pacific Bell _ PG&E South-Oroville _ Viacom Cable TV St to Agencies CalTrans• (Traffic) _ Dept.of Water Resources ✓k Dept.of Fish and Game Forestry(Attn:Craig Carter) — Dept of Parks and Rec. _ Highway Patrol Central Reg.Water Quality Cont. _ Caltrans,Aeronautics Program Department of Conservation _ Off.of Mining Reclamation _ Off.of Governmental&Env.Relations T Dm ept.Social Services,Com .Care Licensing Federal Agencies US Forest Service. _ US Bureau of Land Management _ US Fish&Wildlife Service Army Corps of Engineers Other Districts,Agencies,Committees,etc. Lime Saddle Dist _ Community Association _ Mosq.Abatement.Oroville/Butte Co Drainage _ Butte Env.l Council _ Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society Butte Co.Mining Committee _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _ Butte Ck.Watershed Conservancy_ School Districts BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Feeney Engineering,REZ 99-05 DATE: March 9, 1999 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpdse of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if-any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project,as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated i hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed,please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD)to convert a tennis court to storaee . units and RVan rking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD on property zoned PUD(planned Unit Development)located at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue,approximately 5500 feet'north of East Avenue,Chico, identified as APN 007-410-017. Supervisorial District No. 3. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - _DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON July 8, 1999. COMMENTS,IF ANY,ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 24,1999. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): i By: Date: 7 County Center Drive -Oroville, California 95965 -530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 I FEENEY ENGINEERING 389-C Connors Court Chico,CA 95926 r MEMO: lq DATE: Z /Z Z 1 / 7 TO: C b i FROM: BOB FEENEY PHONE: (916)-899-0409 FAX: (916)-899-0943 MESSAGE: 4kc PP C (vq 1�q ANy NM9 (A't "St- -QM Ac–g -(M E Planning®ivision >� FEB 24 1999 ®r®villa,Calif0mla 3��'�' ��� .2,.NZ4 m Y oo�°O; oo Fic't FGa�c Eve �r�cct';ih obc� W0. •. •ISo•. a. ?i. �' �•. 3.00- DATE RECEIPT TOTAL' PUBLIC LAFCO USE ygRIJ -C.. PUBLIC ZONING ENy OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM NO. RECEIVED WORKS PERMITS DOC VMBNTS KEALTK RECEIPT 17 017 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE • STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING ISSUED BY SPr o Fire- .2,.H 15o aoo. y3t,.o 3;co.. Ccincy . �Incd'�h� Pr DATE RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC LAFCO USE yq RIANC ES PU BIIC 20NING ENV OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM NO. RECEIVED WORKS PERMITS DOCUMENTS HEALTH RECEIPT 17017 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA i OFFICE OF PLANNING { ISSUED BY WELLS FARGO- ANK 3 9 6 9 B 1(9 122 - 1221(1) Fc? 00 g ROBERT WRAY PROPERTIES 110 TOM POLK CIR. 342-9406 CHICO, CA 95973 • 1: 1, 221,01, 1,90: 3969 OL89 OL2230118 LOCATION MAP \ \ N.T S. A.P.N. 07-14-33 P� GOENERAL PLAN P � p6�6h �R 349 0 W ZONING: R-11-34 \ 9� o Pe� INN e 5',y9 g�/ i o GENERAL PLA O N M.D.R. \\ s SITE G�� \ � � t / / \ P \ A.P.N. 07-14-36 A.P.N. 07-14-35 \ / ZONING: R-1 S \ \' o GENERAL PLAN M.D.R. \�� ' \ \ 'c L\ \1) \� � � ��A\/ � N ZONING: R-1 7\ a GENERAL PLAN M.D.R. / \ \ I Y � / GRAPHIC SCALE A.P.N. 07-14-37 40 D 20 40 80 160 \\ 7 I . ZONING: R-1 G \ �\ V /i i \\ \ \ V _ tis 84 Si GENERAL PLAN M.D.R. IN > \ \i TO \ \�� A.P.N. 07-14-38 -LEGEND BIN \/ G / ZONING: R-1 > \D\// o^ GENERAL PLAN M.D.R. / O P = PA 770 GARAGE o 1 Q`�\ _ o n �p \\ Y = YARD L.D.R.= LOW DENSITY RESIDE77AL G UNIT i� �\ M.D.R.= MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL \ / JA.P.N. 07-14-39 I V ZONING: R-1 , ^ \\\ ? \/ �� \\ \ y (V GENERAL PLAN M.D.R. EXIS77NO LIVING UNITS: 37 /) \- \� �7 EX/STiNi OUTSIDE PARKING 36 \ \' v / , _ \/j `\< / / / \ \�J ~' /� = 15'33'58" i \ EXISTING GARAGE PARKING: 72 \ � >� 1ryI^j� \l L = 61.40 \\n // poi �`��� /l �� / NOTE: A.P.N. 07-14-48 m OWNER PROPOSES TO REMOVE EXISTING TENNIS ZONING: R-1 / COURT AND REPLACE WITH THE FOLLOWING \/\ GENERAL PLAN M.D.R. / ASSESSORY USES: TO BE USED BY'TENANTS ,r�� �R� P� \\ I \ ?o / 8 — STORAGE UNITS 22X 22 e� s \� I 18 — STORAGE UNITS 10'X 22 6 — RV PARKING SPACES O I \ J� 0 LANDSCAPE AREA REMAINING AFTER PROPOSED + OR 40X OF PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS IS 106,000 \ y y \ '� - � y \ oo � �s� I ,p�� \\ 4 .00 o _= 3022'00" SI TE PLAN 1$ S Oy \\\�/ OF oA;�L �Q� 11 R = 66.250 0"� �0 y ,,•0,�OLIN 11 A.P.N. 07-14-49 EASTWOOD OAKS O1�P' O y\ 6p \ PPp����P� r I ZONOG: R-1 6.07 AC.7-41-017 \ �F 11 I GENERAL PLAN L.D.R. P O�pE P� y 5 y ,� GE \ / OWNERS: ROBERT AND DONNA WRA Y ti PROPOSED O y GE 5 � l / 289 TOM POLK CIRCLE, IMPROVEMENTS 0 yy poE � �pn' �o� \ \\ I��\sem I A = 36.18'51• / / cHlco, ca. LEGEND y tit1 p�Eta, P� d�p '0\6 / R = 125.00 / EXISTING ZONING P.U.D. ORDANCE NO.2196 \ y `� �5 \ �• Q� gl p� oos L = 79.23 / EXISTING GENERAL PLAN M. D. R. = STORAGE 22'X 22' ��EtP� S = STORAGE 10'X 22' $ GK; \ RVP = RV PARKING OI�R�eP� SHEET 1 OF 1 /N. 0 R 05-07 GENERAL PLAN L.D.R. \ �L� \� 389C Connors Court Chico Ca 95926 \ Voice (530)899-0409 Fax (530)899-0943 r Dc :m P 1 CD ® �o N ca R i PA'SEC. 15 , T. 22 N. R. I E. M.D. B. a M. , � Z � 0 7-r 41 07-22 107-201 �,� � 07-32 LASSEN AVE 1312.00 216 155 � ( l 88 I80 � , 2 r 2 c0 N, 4 I • fr . o ` v .53AC _ cv 9O 1.13 AC N -160 Q 94 AC 200 � in N 12 ( LOT 27 LOT l7 LOT l 20 I2.5!AC to J 3 AC ,'� CASA DE FLORES N.H.P. oh, (Layout Bk.74 Pg. 01) 07-06 88 T 15 iZ�O h I 36-82AC ✓, '� J ,. `cd �� LB.Q_[5__ . _ °' � -}-• 07-18 -- 331.60 S,>j0 \ 3 /9 PTN 13 chp 32 15 O s; rn Z. O 1/ m LOT 1 .84 AC14 ti 2:10 AC cz 6.0 7 AC 13 . 128 _ 07-14 �u_ PM. 70-412 LOT 16 w 3 4 E `STWOGD OAKS P3 o� ry /49 _ 0 TN ILOT 28 _44A� i4B BF4 ` 3.60 / �I 2 _ ` 4i ge SUg do 5.40 AC / / UNi I I 1 - A'�' \ �0 / 14 2 ossa /0 7-O PM 109-653 B / 5� l *4y / PTN 2 e 051, PM 65-601tpj O7- 1. ---- b. \/ 8 zES / ��a' O M P PANAMA AVE 192 p,�tPND a / \ �/ m 1.12AC 34 „9.s3 <l ESV 249 � \,gyp. �,�\ IN" /29 128 ,Q � J /137 907-13 / I2:\ CL essorP 's No. 07-41 � Count of Butte , Colif. EASTWOOD OAKS CONDO SUB , 91 M.O.R. 26/27, MAY 10, 1983 REVISED: 1.0-88 HOBART SUB.OF THE DANIEL BIDWELL RANCHO, 04 IN,.O.R. 24, NOVEMBER 7, 1904 107" NOTICE OF DETERMINATION LIPS TO: _ Office of Plan.& Research Dept. 1400 Tenth Street SEP O 7 1999 Sacramento, CA 95814 CAN X Butte County Clerk B J GRU86,` By ljuao Co.Clerk FROM: Butte County Planning Deputy 7 County Center Dr., Oroville 95965 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: REZ 99-05, Rezone , AP Number: 007-410-017 Applicant: Feeney Engineering, 389 C Connors Court, Chico, CA 95926 .State Clearinghouse Number(If submitted to clearinghouse): Contact Person: Stephen Betts Telephone Number: 538-7601 Project Location: at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue, Chico Project Description: Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD)to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD This is to advise that the Butte County Board of Supervisors has approved the above-described project on July 27, 1999, and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1. The project will, _X_will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An.Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the.provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures_X were, were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations was,_X_was not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at: Date received for filing and posting at OPR Butte County Department of Development Services 7-County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Randy Wilson Principal Planner 1 ,. .. •l��,tt�r` - :`n n+ � r Mitigation Measures: 1. The existing solid fence on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained and maintained in good condition. The existing vegetation on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained to the maximum extent possible. Any vegetation removed from this area shall be replaced prior to start of use of the storage facility . A solid fence at least seven (7)feet tall and vegetation shall be installed along the west side of the proposed storage facility prior to start of use.The required vegetation on the south and west sides of the proposed storage facility shall provide a visual screen from adjacent t properties.All vegetation surrounding the storage facility shall be maintained in a healthy condition. 2. All outside lights installed for the storage unit use shall be fully shielded to prevent stray light and glare on adjacent parcels, and to prevent adverse impacts on aircraft flight activities. Prior to issuance of a building permit a plan showing the location, height, and type(s)of all light fixtures shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. 3. Measures shall be taken to control fugitive dust emissions from all civil construction associated soil palliatives. Dust control measures shall be noted on any necessary improvement plans. Questions regarding fugitive dust control may be directed to the Butte County Air Quality Management District at phone number(530)891-2882. 4. No hazardous or explosive materials shall be stored in the storage unit facility. Hazardous materials are defined as any substance or material that, by reason o fits toxic, caustic, corrosive, abrasive, or otherwise injurious properties, may be detrimental or deleterious to the health of any person handling or otherwise coming into contact with such material or substance. The property owner shall place language in the rental agreement for each storage unit stating that storage of hazardous or explosive material is prohibited. Prior to establishment of the use, a copy of the proposed rental agreement shall be submitted to an approved by the Planning Division. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FILING FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding (Fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4; Section 753.5c, Title 14, California Code of Regulations) Project Title/Butte County Location: REZ 99-05, at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue, Chico Project Description: Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD Findings of Exemption(attach as necessary): 1. The county of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a(Negative Declaration or Enviornmental Impact) so as to evaluate the potential of this project for adverse environmental impact: 2. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence before the County that the project will have potential for an adverse impact on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the-wildlife depends. 3. The County of Butte has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5 (d), of Title 14, California Code of Regulations, if applicable. 4. The project is hereby found to be de minimis in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the State Fish and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. 'Certification: . I hereby certify that the County of Butte has made the above findings of fact and that based upon the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game. Code. By: Randy ilson, Principal Planner Lead Agency: County of Butte Date: August 19, 1999 DECLARATION OF FEES DUE • (California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Feeney Engineering ' 389 C Connors Court Chico, CA 95926 (530) 899-0409 FILING NO. CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION ( ) A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee (X) B. De Minimus Impact- Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION-FEE REQUIRED ( ) A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee ( ) B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. ( ) OTHER(Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT/NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). #17804 2. ( ) NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: Randy Wilson Title: Principal Planner Lead Agency: Butte County Department of Development Services Date: August 19, 1999 TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. f WELLS FARGO BANK 4189 B114288 1210(2) s - ROBERT WRAY PROPERTIES 110 TOM POLK CIR. 342-9406? f��0���7 CHICO, CA 95973 �z -- - -4: 1112L04288211:01890111223004189 16-1129111 W4 RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC PUBLIC ENV. NOEMOD DATE NO. RECEIVED WORKS LAFCO PLANNING SALES HEALTH FIRE F/G FEE OTHER APPLIC NT RECEIVED FROM RECEIPT 17804 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING ISSU D BY .;" , I ' NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO: _ Office of Plan.& Research Dept. 1400 Tenth Street bw SEP 071999 Sacramento, CA 95814 CAN D RUi36;; tlutte co.clerk X Butte County Clerk By Deputy FROM: Butte County Planning 7 County Center Dr., Oroville 95965 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152.of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: REZ 99-05, Rezone AP Number: 007-410-017 Applicant: Feeney Engineering, 389 C Connors Court, Chico, CA 95926 .State Clearinghouse Number(If submitted to clearinghouse): Contact Person: Stephen Betts Telephone Number: 538-7601 Project Location: at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue, Chico Project Description: Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD)to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD This is to advise that the Butte County Board of Superyisors has approved the above-described project on July 27, 1999, and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1. The project will,_X_will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An.Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of C EQA. _X_ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures_X_were, were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations was,_X_was not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at: Date received for filing and posting at OPR Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Randy Wilson Principal Planner Ii I c ,� ..... ... _.... 3� �7;i . , � � S � i Mitigation Measures: 1. The existing solid fence on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained and maintained in good condition. The existing vegetation on the south side of the proposed storage facility shall be retained to the maximum extent possible.Any vegetation removed from this area shall be replaced prior to start of use of the storage facility.A solid fence at least seven (7)feet tall and vegetation shall be installed along the west side of the proposed storage facility prior to start of use. The required vegetation on the south and west sides of the proposed storage facility shall provide a visual screen from adjacent t properties.All vegetation surrounding the storage facility shall be maintained in a healthy condition. 2. All outside lights installed for the storage unit use shall be fully shielded to prevent stray light and glare on adjacent parcels, and to prevent adverse impacts on-aircraft flight activities. Prior to issuance of a building permit a plan showing the location, height, and type(s) of all light fixtures shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. 3. Measures shall be taken to control fugitive dust emissions from all civil construction associated soil palliatives. Dust control measures shall be noted on any necessary improvement plans. Questions regarding fugitive dust control may be directed to the Butte County Air Quality Management District at phone number(530)891-2882. 4. No hazardous or explosive materials shall be stored in the storage unit facility. Hazardous materials are defined as any substance or material that, by reason o fits toxic, caustic, corrosive, abrasive, or otherwise injurious properties, may be detrimental or-deleterious to the health of any person handling or otherwise coming into contact with such material or substance. The property owner shall place language in the rental agreement for each storage unit stating that storage of hazardous or explosive material is prohibited. Prior.to establishment of the use, a copy of the proposed rental agreement shall be submitted to an approved by the Planning Division. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FILING FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding (Fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4; Section 753.5c, Title 14, California Code of Regulations) Project Title/Butte County Location: REZ 99-05, at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of East Avenue, Chico Project Description: Rezone to modify a Planned Unit Development(PUD) to convert a tennis court to storage units and RV parking for residents of the Eastwood Oaks PUD Findings of Exemption(attach as necessary): 1. The county of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a(Negative Declaration or Enviornmental Impact) so as to evaluate the potential of this project for adverse environmental impact: 2. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence before the County that the project will have potential for an adverse impact on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. 3. The County of Butte has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5 (d), of Title 14, California Code of Regulations, if applicable. 4. The project is hereby found to be de minimis in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the State Fish and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. Certification: I hereby certify that the County of Butte has made the above findings of fact and that based upon the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. By: Randyilson, Principal Planner Lead Agency: County of Butte Date: August 19, 1999 DECLARATION OF FEES DUE • (California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Feeney Engineering 389 C Connors Court Chico, CA 95926 (530) 899-0409 FILING NO. i CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION ( ) A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee (X) B. De Minimus Impact- Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION-FEE REQUIRED ( ) A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee ( ) B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. ( ) OTHER(Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT/NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). #17804 2. ( ) NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: Randy Wilson Title: Principal Planner Lead Agency: Butte County Department of Development Services Development Date: August 19, 1999 TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. WELLS FARGO BANK 4189 ^ „4288 Q 1210121 order of $ D U al s ROBERT WRAY PROPERTIES 110 TOM 95 A)V l �ze^01� ' CHICO, CA 9597373,4 - A: 12 104 288 21:0 1890 12 23011'4 189 /7eY1 C05� � sn RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC PUBLIC ENV. NOE/NOD DATE NO. RECEIVED WORKS LAFCO PLANNING SALES HEALTH FIRE FIG FEE OTHER _ APPLIC NT RECEIVED FROM RECEIPT 17804 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING ISSU D BY ` 0 COUNTY OF BUTTE ovi OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT sc -J 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE a Q OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9-5965-3397 cc f.- NAY 11'9 9 am 0 .3 0 MUM SMILE REQUESTED PBM"efl 1203774 PUBLIC EL: Of47 050 010 Of.-Dki G T A T U S AC-- M(DE 7ER0l',lE ALLAN ETAL HEARING 3 LYNl\lW0(3D CIR CA 95973 CH I CC) MOE-003* 959730184 1199 a2 05/15/99 NOTICE RETURN TO SENDER MOE PO BOX 1.253 LUCERNE CA 95458-1253 if 1.1 1 111111 fill 11111 1111111 1111111111 d1saildlill fit 11:111*11.11 i i� i F JJJ i w' a i