Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
TPM 05-25_PLANNING
1 till � � V VUVNUUII� �I �nY NH AVN SEPARATORSHEET .oN 069 - 010 - 030 >ao,ERNUMaEa PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE NO.: TPM 05-25 PROJECT TYPE: Tentative Parcel Map APN: 064-010-030 APPLICANT: Romer Nichols:_ ADDRESS: P.O. Box 512, Paradise, CA 95967 PHONE: (530) 873-3542 OWNER: Rodger Nichols ADDRESS: P.O. Box 512, Paradise, CA 95967 REPRESENTATIVE:Northstar Engineering ADDRESS: 20 Declaration Drive, Chico, CA 95973 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To divide a 40+/- acre property into.four 10 acre properties LOCATED: on the south side of Tika Lane, approximately 0.4 miles south of Nimshew Road, Magalia. PROPERTY ZONED: AR-2-1/2 (Agricultural-Residential, 2-1/2-acre parcels) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: AR (Agricultural Residential) TOWN/AREA: Magalia 1. Application accepted: 5/24/2005 Amount: $ 5062 Receipt#: 430710 2. Assigned To: Mark Michelena 3. Comments sent to: Public Works Director, Environmental.Health, Assessor, LAFCo, Agricultural Commissioner, CDF, Building Manager, County Counsel 4. Sent to Inter-Departmental Review Committee(IDR): 5. Status Letter sent to applicant: 6. Date scheduled for IDR: 6/15/2005 7. Comments received from: 8. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 9., MailingList/Lead-in Sheet: 10. Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No. Categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration Mitigation;Negative Declaration Subject to Fish & Game: Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex.—CEQA # Other 11. Staff Report: Project Video: 12. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: 13. Publication Notice Written: Display Ad Prepared: 14. Notices Mailed: Number of Notices: 15. Newspaper Publication Date: 0 C P G R 16. Planning Commission Hearing(s): Action taken: 17. Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: 18. Remanded to Planning Commission: 19. Type approval/denial letter, send to applicant: 20. N.O.E. /N.O.D. /APPENDIX G: Fish&Game Fees Paid: Yes No 21. Take.file to Public Works: DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on page 2 APPLICANT'S NAME: (If application is different from.owner an affidavit is required.) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: R O6,6 R- 4-- I -004.5 4(o'y� - O/o - .0,30 ADDRESS: STREET,CITY,STATE,&ZIP CODE FILE ER: (FOR OFFICE usE�_ o. 50"< 512.. P,,49401S9 OC 6.4 9SW 7 M O S NAME OF PROPOSED PROTECT(If any) TELEPHONE: ,AIA 5"3� 8T3 - 3SyZ LOCATION OF PROJECT(Major cross streets and Address,if any) g. m ,Fs �'A,,.�'a .?F`:> �y�z:,.,�a ."� •s'` Y .�' '�eO!. PP�/'YY<< :32:;�`:tin'�:• `:s! �: ,. .,,.s'" ��? .°�E��.,r` ..�'a., r'"'°`cmc"�;s,',.i��• i;.F. ""S�:«v�;>,�� :u OWNER'S NAME: TELEPHONE: )ZobE?Z- L. . .--//CAD 4,5 (3.YAO )8I4 - 3 5 q Z.. ADDRESS: CITY,STATE,&ZIP CODE: /Po. & 3?Z /��tr 0�5� . ,4 '?067 ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE(in Square Feet or Acres) ill- Z%Z A VACA J7- !o.S.S ACA'a.;5 t EXISTING STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) IAAWC ^1A (Check One) (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC [PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER ELM �nn �s�:mr•>� � .,/�,,�y:a., ss 3?' 'r?, "° .<U�". 'a`'c"6,:Z:a,Hr<oi's�i .4G.o>+?• ";� /:ri ri <%,�,,.�;s f'n:%�:w.. ',s,,,' „n" "M'"''%'.r, :s/', d45. 'z.��'rl•- •��. y 3.r '.•��:.. .� ,..�'.�..t.� gs, gC"<o:sk" '`,-`•;4^ �;` 's3��•d� `�. '��.".«.z�•..c����e�`��a�i���y��ro�4s��y>.,,�. ,>p >"�-�;.w•�` y s':x,.`2Sl r..�% /�,¢ x���- ��'. KS,`?;k£ �:'Fik.�G.''L�:i, ::. "<'.l ...:7,�2.'��`�,�C.��� �:.� �:✓:�£:H ..w'.%b::�25�/„3b� h..�>C9f.�3Yr,.wfG.• ❑GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑REZONE dTENTATTVE PARCEL MAP ❑USE PERMIT BUTTE ❑WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑MINOR USE PERMIT COUNTY ❑BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ VARIANCE MAY 2 4 2005 ❑LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑MINOR VARIANCE ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ❑MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑OTHER ' „lti,.. /, «..n%3/s��C„c;x�: ,� £:,., wr�� �,.sr%2Gkr, 'S�'"�A"" ..�,.< .':fFr •�..�;, 1 ;p< „�.Fx.� r :si�'7' S. %��.'!.o',%;. -�� . .�s✓ 4i =: ,:, ��j..<:�;SY s s" c .;�,'' '` .,.PKC.,"'�, "oj/yg`�u t«tc>�<�^.'s/�n�: i'a�`:,_';��'�yf a'�,"l�;:.�.,� 3£ 'f' ^§s �. .� �"5k'4%h^>.; �e:�', ;� •;�n _� :� .v s3 ^3S',�4,<,�" ��., :f.:�:-.:.v;Crv: ::5:'a. �..,: :4, Cc,".,;^a, b� A��r�.:w 'k,: .4.�I:'l.�x����i '��., ..Asn ;,� ,x*.o-. :>£,•',>:>,:.<,k,:;�f>.>s .g. <�.b:> s£k2, �o�„`�. , ' ... b + >. .. .. �<:.:�..:,Gy<9=ksG. .,;...�� :. '. : .:" »s:;;s'�,.�,�.::ws.'vv.�"'; .�.'..'�.'= �'••, << ; FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT(Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division,describe the number and size of parcels.) SPu i AJ "i /��3-fL.�C.s. vy< ;.'z$'9< '°YD.Yi'. ,W'.S' <7F..h wiwp'%a� .:✓ .,.. .r5 "S"7x<':::sy a z°.":xirm�' ro "u4`'. ��yg`a* ?: :J/ '� zz^<: •Cf "'F�;:? r,�G`:,rs, ��y.,.,/i�zk' < ,srs ?zx^sa�s'sE:4;:-,..`d,'vz.'�.'°��•,f:F�:>�:3�ta ura�:> �., �y. >'f, r,. .>,;,?,ss+,,!�,.� �tiQ%£y r• rc.�. ��..�<��,d:,;. v's�-: ..fix'` fi^.' .:,�4. .3. .f F... :s: .;✓9'<> ,E?Y./•. r.:£:o:.!'.., cra, ./.3.?'4.�</t�'>gL .. LY ,, :i%»'�<:., . �yxr`. Sl'x .c,.. ?£<:xa'^`3x.., :✓,s. C .../�' '.is' , <mq `5,.,o •:.,it.,hs r .:.s;'s£r a. .Y.0 ,H•%> ,x� �„ r :..�>,'oa",�^ fes^ ",� .�,:.: /fir v� .•5.,� �;�:';,:,,, '9'.'^�r"rs°•:a��`.7 /. i/' ✓,�""`.�';£rd " i.'a'..;:,� :,r, r,F�:�� ,..r3a5-i7,,;;: ✓v:'�'�:.s.�:%',,.G.:! c`'Y°'�Y.>:i a, I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER,I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of thorizationnd1 include the affidavit with this application.) DATE: 25 b6,10 S SIGNATURE: (nt2 /v Ec'14 ot, �_ K:\FORMS\UNIFORM APPLICATION Pagel of2 iia •� INI a AGENT AUTHORIZATION TO: Butte County, Department of Development Services: .�Io�TH Sro/L �,.d6�,.1CC1L1.-lC� Phone Number(9' 89 3 Print Name Zdl7� l�.A i�a,�! 1721 v/i5� Gtf/c 0 c-A W)73 Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process the application for tj<✓--: PA&X-i-L MAP on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number: APN# 010 This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) �oC�F jL .ill C�ta�5 Pr Print Name Ea Sigte— Signature Architect and/or Engineer: Phone Number�) - Print Name of Architect/Engineer Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: ,� ' Zq Total Amount Received: Z . OU AP Number(s) Legal Description Owners Authorization Zoning Requirements Project Description 'Copies of plot plan Taken by: r'S Receipt No. D PW/LD Plan 3 E.H. ,Dqt ' b b CDF Z6 NOD/NOE Fees _ 3Z- � Payment of the currently required App ca 'on Fee and/or Deposit(Any unu d portion of a deposit)will be returned upon final action. G i Current fee for this application is as of Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". KAFORMSWNIFORM APPLICATION Page 2 of 2 . ,. � , �' 7 , � * � � lf�� �a.�,�� � 1 ` I BUTTE COUNTY MAY 2 41005 COUNTY OF BUTTE DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM SERVICES (To be completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or project sponsor: 2. Address of.project: Ti44 &1W — %/ I4l J",Jrw if-7,0M I�!,(/ JI'Y,,6w Rd. �vi'A6�1G/fit Assessor's Parcel Number: . D(oq — 0/0 — O 3o 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: ,�loF-s Ti4'� �sJ6i.�lc.1t1.�l6 Zo �,?rCc.4�2 R-�?�.J p!L•_ G1/i�'o 64 `}S`7 73 (ova 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: !`otil� 5. Existing general plan designation: A rZ, I 6. Existing zoning district: A Z �Z 7. How is land currently used? v/*'_A J7 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Project Description: Description: 9. Site size: /I>, 67-5, ( cre Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: Compact: A✓- Total: AIA / 11. Plans attached: Yes v No PA94-at., mAP 12. Proposed development schedule IA 13. Associated projects �•� bl�1 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development AIA 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 1 Y y-, _ 1 Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes,'range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. IJA 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 1,1A 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. n64 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. A.Z+ 19. If the project involves a minor variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or-public lands'or roads. 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. ✓ 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. i 25. Change in bay, lake; river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels .in the vicinity. 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or,explosives: 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption / (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ r� i , � . •-�.•� w Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. 'Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. ,j�E Arr,4( 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. j%,4Gt-{h-,a r Certification hereby certify that the statements furnished above and.in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Sianature KAPlanning\FORMS\Submittal\ENV-INFO.FRM ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division D i )kj : ! �, � i � ! t L ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ADDITIONAL SHEET #32 Project situated on Nimshew Ridge with minimal slope and stable soil. Site has native plants and animals consistent with surrounding area. Site is out of the Middle Butte Creek ravine, therefore having little potential for cultural or historical aspects. No known scenic aspects. No existing structures exist on site. #33 Surrounding area much the same with regards to topography, soil, plants, animals and cultural, historical and scenic aspects. Surrounding land use is low density rural residential. i BUTTE COUNTY MAY 2 b 2005 DEVELOPMENF SERVICES I Mid Valley Title & Escrow Company 601 Main Street Chico, CA 95928 May 16, 2005 Northstar Engineering_, 20 Declaration Drive Chico, CA 95973 Title Officer: Linda Woodcock Phone: (530) 893-5644 Order Number: 0401-1913048 (LW) Escrow Officer: Linda Woodcock Phone: (530) 893-5644 Escrow Number: 0401-1913048 Buyer: Nichols Property: CA Attached please find the following item(s): Parcel Map Guarantee Thank You for your confidence and support. We at Mid Valley Title &Escrow Company maintain the fundamental principle: Customer First. BUTTE . -COUNTY MAY 2 4 2005 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Mid Valley Title&Escrow Company 1 • Form No.23 Order Number: 0401- 1913048 CLTA Parcel Map Guarantee(1-13-78) Page Number: 1 PARCEL MAP GUARANTEE Parcel Map Ref: Order No: 0401-1913048 Fee: 250.00 SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE,THE LIMITS OF LIABILITY AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HERETO ANNEXED AND MADE A PART OF THIS GUARANTEE, First American Title Insurance Company a California.corporation, herein called the Company, GUARANTEES The County of Butte and any city within which the land is located, herein called the Assured, against loss not exceeding $1,000.00 which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurance. which the Company hereby gives that, according to the public records, on the date stated below: 1: The title to the herein described estate or interest was vested in the vestee named, subject to . the matters shown as Exceptions herein, which Exceptions are not necessarily shown in the order of their priority; and 2. Had said Parcel Map been recorded in the office of the County Recorder of said county, such map would be sufficient for use as a primary reference in legal descriptions of the parcels within its boundaries. Dated: April 07, 2005, at 7:30 A.M. First American Title Insurance Company stAtr er cad Xr s>�a nce-Cor parry ..:..:. .. . - ;�: :' rI�iiG$lGCtVT AT�'e5T F,IZ't �SFCt�T ................. Mid Valley Title&Escrow Company Form No.23 Order Number: 0401- 1913048 CLTA Parcel Map Guarantee(1-13-78) Page Number: 2 The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Guarantee is a fee. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: Roger L. Nichols and Jennifer L. Nichols, husband and wife as joint tenants The land included within the boundaries of the Parcel Map hereinbefore referred to in this Guarantee is described as follows: THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BUTTE, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL I: PARCEL 3, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON FEBRUARY 29, 1984, IN BOOK 94 OF MAPS,AT PAGE(S) 65. PARCEL II: A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES,AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON FEBRUARY 29, 1984, IN BOOK 94 OF MAPS, AT PAGE(S) 65. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF PARCEL I, DESCRIBED HEREIN. APN: 064-010-030-000 EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE 1. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2005-2006, a lien not yet due or payable. 2. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to Chapter 3.5 commencing with Section 75 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. 3. Dedications, reservations, and note(s) if any,for specific purposes as set forth on the Map filed February 29, 1984, in Book 94 of Maps, Page 65, of Maps . 4. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Road Maintenance Agreement" recorded February 29, 1984 as Book 2914, Page 604 of Official Records. 5. An easement for road and public utilities and incidental purposes in the document recorded March 19, 1984 as Book 2920, Page 114 of Official Records. Affects as shown on parcel map recorded February 29, 1984, in Book 2914 of Maps, at Page 604, Butte County Records. Mid Valley Title&Escrow Company Form No.23 Order Number: 0401- 1913048 CLTA Parcel Map Guarantee(1-13-78) Page Number: 3 6. An unrecorded lease dated August 7, 1995, executed by Whub Real Estate Limited Partnership, a Delaware Limited Partnership as lessor and The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.,a national banking association as lessee, as disclosed by a Assignment of Lessor's Interest in Leases recorded October 17, 1995 as Serial No. 95-35981 of Official Records. The Lessor's Interest interest under the lease has been assigned to The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. a national banking association by assignment recorded October 17, 1995 as Serial No. 95- 35981 of Official Records. 7. A deed of trust to secure an original indebtedness of$91,000.00 recorded November 5, 2003 as Serial No. 2003-78177 of Official Records. Dated: September 30, 2003 Trustor: Roger L. Nichols and Jennifer L. Nichols Trustee: David S. Huffman-Third Federal Savings&Loan Beneficiary: Deepgreen Bank 8. The Land herein was Created By: Parcel Map, Recorded: February 29, 1984. The Vestee herein acquired Title By: Roger L. Nichols and Jennifer L. Nichols, husband and wife as joint tenants, Recorded August 9, 2000, Serial No. 2000-30847. LW/Ig Mid Valley Title&Escrow Company Form No.23 Order Number: 0401- 1913048 CLTA Parcel Map Guarantee(1-13-78) Page Number: 4 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE 1. Except to the extent that specific assurance are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee,the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters against the title,whether or not shown by the public records. (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property;or,(2)Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments,or notices of such proceedings,whether or not the matters excluded under(1)or(2)are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public records. (c) (1) Unpatented mining claims;(2)reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;(3)water rights,claims or title to water,whether or not the matters excluded under(1),(2)or(3)are shown by the public records. 2. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee,the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description set forth in Schedule(A),(C)or in Part 2 of this Guarantee,or title to streets,roads,avenues,lanes,ways or waterways to which such land abuts,or the right to maintain therein vaults,tunnels,ramps,or any structure or improvements;or any rights or easements therein,unless such property,rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. (b) Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,whether or not shown by the public records;(1)which are created,suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds;(2)which result in no loss to the Assured;or(3)which do not result in the invalidity or potential invalidity of any judicial or non-judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. (d) The validity,legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this Guarantee. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. Definition of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a)the"Assured":the party or parties named as the Assured in this Guarantee,or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company. (b)"land":the land described or referred to in Schedule(A)(C)or in Part 2,and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term"land"does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule(A)(C)or in Part 2,nor any right,title, interest,estate or easement in abutting streets,roads,avenues,alleys,lanes,ways or waterways. (c)"mortgage":mortgage,deed of trust,trust deed,or other security instrument. (d)"public records":records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (e)"date":the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of tide or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest,as stated herein,and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company,then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the manner or matters for which prompt notice is required;provided,however,that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party,notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions;Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a)The Company shall have the right,at its sole option and cost,to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding,interpose a defense,as limited in (b),or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein,or to establish the lien rights of the Assured,or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee,whether or not it shall be liable hereunder,and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph,it shall do so diligently. (b)If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated in Paragraph 4(a)the Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice(subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause)to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel,nor will the Company pay any fees,costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c)Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee,the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right,in its sole discretion,to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. (d)In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding,an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding,and all appeals therein,and permit the Company to use,at its option,the name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company,an Assured,at the Company's expense,shall give the Company all reasonable aid in any action or proceeding,securing evidence,obtaining witnesses,prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein,or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation,the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. S. Proof of Loss Damage. Mid Valley Title&Escrow Company Form No.23 Order Number: 0401- 1913048 CLTA Parcel Map Guarantee(1-13-78) Page Number: 5 In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company,a proof of loss or damage signed and swom to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety(90)days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state,to the extent possible,the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage,the Company's obligation to such Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition,the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination,inspection and copying,at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company,all records,books,ledgers,checks,correspondence and memoranda,whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee,which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further,if requested by any authorized representative of the Company,the Assured shall grant its permission,in writing,for any authorized representative of the Company to examine,inspect and copy all records,books,ledgers,checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party,which reasonably pertain to the loss damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company,pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless,in the reasonable judgment of the Company,it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath,produce other reasonably requested information of grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph,unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation,shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. 6. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims:Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee,the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee,or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or,if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder,the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon,together with any costs,reasonable attorneys'fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase,payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness,the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness,together with any collateral security,to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph(a)the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage,other than to make the payment required in that paragraph,shall terminate,including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4,and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b)To Pay Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim Assured against under this Guarantee,together with any costs,attorneys'fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph(b)the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage,other than to make the payment required in that paragraph,shall terminate,including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described,and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The Liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a)the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or in Part 2; (b)the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee,as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations,at the time the loss or damage Assured against by this Guarantee occurs,together with interest thereon;or (c)the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or interest subject to any defect,lien or encumbrance Assured against by this Guarantee. 8. Limitation of Liability. (a)If the Company establishes the titre,or removes the alleged defect,lien or encumbrance,or cures any other matter Assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by any method,including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom,it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b)In the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent,the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction,and disposition of all appeals therefrom,adverse to the title,as stated herein. (c)The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling.any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 9.Reduction of Liability or Termination of Liability. All payments under this Guarantee,except payments made for costs,attomeys'fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. 10. Payment of Loss. (a)No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed,in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations,the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty(30)days thereafter. 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee,all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant. Mid Valley Title&Escrow Company Form No.23 Order Number: 0401- 1913048 CLTA Parcel Map Guarantee(1-13-78) Page Number: 6 The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company,the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have recovered its principal,interest,and costs of collection. 12. Arbitration. Unless prohibited by applicable law,either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitrable matters may include,but are not limited to,any controversy or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee,any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Liability is$1,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability is in excess of$1,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attomeys'fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is located permits a court to award attorneys'fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s)may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 13. Liability Limited to This Guarantee;Guarantee Entire Contract, (a)This Guarantee together with all endorsements,if any,attached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee,this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. (b)Any claim of loss or damage,whether or not based on negligence,or any action asserting such daim,shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (c)No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President,a Vice President,the Secretary,and Assistant Secretary„or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14. Notices,Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall indude the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to the Company at 2 First American Way,Bldg 2,Santa Ana,California,92707. Mid Valley Title&Escrow Company O N N L Ln O O C .......... c 64-01 I T.23N. R 3E. M.Q �M r 036.57 , 1 /!20.69' I XW.. — — O O ' I I �' Parodde P•Mt'. N / /2 NnII AO./.S °a Para iJe Pin t I Lor z 28 m. i 29 - 4 r QVVVQ �I �J ?' Sue'n. NO. o 04 I 3008.05 39.0/AC , I 40.2fAC 3/ GOT A., 00 447047 1 `— aaa i q 1126!.69 �TINA 3.: II 93.02ACr /O e.J/'t Ii �' I /�,I /200 e 49olnc 26 2 x.9919 '' / 32 Poroa,re �q�', Q H, 3 e.atee 25 34 20.66 i A '98.09A 'I Pines ` 28BAC \ BK 65 e :s Y !3.64 / eear 24 " -02 • x•.• Il JJ r d' 5u01n. No..4 m I f ,e4eJ, 23 ^�Z 35 i ilkI v�,/ _-- -- Porodite Xner I '\\_ cc \ r PMTS-6495.8 14o.oe 1324.62 V( // "&.r J I \ I PT SBf ?72.0•��3 _ I v // tte c 54 T057 Ir 1 rJX.ff LOr9 LOT8 I 1 6�0 „ Lor 15 oPM�48-69/O ,>tr3 II 16 .d4 720.66 (� //,oe,.ec I�ir� 587060 Porod:te P:ner �\\ .I y¢ t —— I _ __ 893.10 Dd N _ � PoioO'r Pipers �Ol/0 cc !/ I for IF BK 63 BK 661 6 _ — — — — —— BK 58 Lor 4 ,( Lor 3 r -�, 'I LOT 2 I LOT! I / Po a P/net 9j 'II I i i I ��, i 1 I Co ry CND EJIe/et Lor s corep c/ 7 I Lor B' BK 66 '� I PorOd;te Plan o� 1 ? I eau r7.Cpm ores I 211 I o 1l ,e Lor 12 Lard��i/7 'r/0 I Lorl9 I � � Paradise Pner `1 CoeNr7 CND Erlel's b y Mil No.4 111 IL`s/I/( I> � wr/d III /Lor/4 II Lor 15 I L If I Assessor4 Map No, 64-0. BK 5r County of Butfle,Calif JANUARY 1957 EF A 21-r.e-rnwr 5ou,'C.. A SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE o ie tow. t'w>rxe a+-Fi o� 1-2-0 y',e.-,Pse LS L6{s 00 This map .a.prepared by mea,aWn mf elanm ..on6 1. based upon a /'u As RL(Q) h9' suer/1.omfsmmc.with the re4u1relnml. of the Sabdlrlslm M Apo and NJr,4 r+t Ott• local ordinance at the request of f P s NF BL's< =(,rete Saa Arw,a A B4 Y.u•,p./p4`RCMe�) I dell.9 ✓N�v ,roe1 1 henDr/fate Motthis parcel ma Drj,; L»i�.4 9./lI' FII' \ I u119L >iloL p L>11>L 41 I L (QQ 99..N�M•b 1,11'e I+l.LG / 2 B e NB1' Se'f B�,B'tAl al) / COn/Ohne b Me a 89•P/•9v Nt!>'So 44`A I5T3.2 pq6• r l,y 2'.ReN P/c sOMlonflall pprored 01 eondiflonall 1Mlollr. D.94•M19D, (L.X G't."u II N•�4) / I�`c XNa•Are]-5 1310171 �N69•B•Li Si E 13eL9) l� dt/ Soft ns{ta.(6J map, If any. 'F(/ ( L.fp_4] t[ cf 4.N Nd!' 2'/S a ,szo.c1 _ 9 g�Up 1p _ B9b' Hal'3341-. <3 d.N•R ZL" LT II r9 Sar Gaw•x 11 r tee.ef' 12T3•L.1' t i•L>a.ef lE •Ti--'d$�W o-) r r kI ft.3634 L•lDL.{T , I 1`I/ !w.Il'v',c✓ 1 4B=.f>) {` fa / (Qf�318 G5'34.1J) t} 8a \ P `�°".... 't �,tcaacs/... •F .rte' P(.ttl°a4•' e.Z "� cal.+T +% A.(4) 1 2 ,A •moi 7 ' N•r.< y jt;od•' Iy I 6¢ •s 19 0^�3 Q�s 6we> r <,oP,•,c.,r 4531a4 4 a ,`, ,�(• D I P eceL 2 Nes z]'ss'I4uu • >p s>{II 1 io.s1 A<.Ga.1f n°> e]D.v ' tor. e�� Jo'(�y COUNTY SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE This mop a ?,b .IM the tedulrem me of the SebdlrWas Mop Act add bed JuiL 1, W,V b l 39.01 Ac. ordinance We 2T TJ• dor of FeeNV ,IB84 `•S•• 3'J p > 1 V U I YI V;J C.e..i Ga ( A/Ha.Lwri.N r �!/S,5•°L'/i'W� T)10f V portio°of n9A LANG. 4 ape RoNaD wG..,o✓Pm c ur tc V bw N,N<A.,.ri %GNw='� essaa'!.f GB CPjYS4G•Jobt G) fhelrn •IIMn the heavy herder IDIea and offered for OedkoNon Is (ars)nal 4<t•]e 06abs w o oilca<o Fea y ti 14 4 G _a> 'l t34.°f wcepted of this time. MM � � � omicwr,eN N C M / JFF(1r 0��•L'Z ��qq AAIIDo 00 m- -..L F > h :/Jn�V" (510 ��1� s a+•a'sr.� ��/� .�I Doo. 1' f.L. /6.e' LL Dfl�Pl Q{L./�1moi.isa,w•< c.•crn cc'%4c�- /L ,6 Vd µ(,�'Y b• V �(d�a �1�4 (,�_ys/O•Go'L9U� FenN6 C•.r> J.,sra r. -Ce.N+rr.N b,mr N 60'a♦'3f-E ,501.]O ` / •�� � �. '[ Zbe,L/ e a•N�.rwL , (e.YQXNee'o+44"e K•L.>) 15oL.fT) / 'T� �\ D (♦!p>-Re<aew(aaL)=»N•r1a Fw.uN.)(¢cf(Nee•a••zs•E 1FLssot1N1.D1O9z)(nsY/ta(¢/)��„nVo ,. w0 99.oi G.»s\ o ^--lp,o' 9l.� ec.c u-It+s':ns�o'ss.l:'a,eL:JL�S y>rt•a1�L'rL"� t, ,,_ RECORDER'S CERTIFICA E QdFiled this N' ear of CL 1ni $16¢chi¢ PA In e1olbn l Mepa,° pags ni y0 5i Ac.q al ,ro e_s , Me Hours/ of LIPPIN COTT-GUTH ASSOCIATES. FII' N N I I 65. W - 0 a (� p CS1.sc�s4aso ( ( 5 s+'K'3]"v Serial No. -S`F.7L/ W a ,t� 6 a''9�d h1 „ • sa,d> > 4,e. _..1 fl{1; ..L.41. � �6•'eft >W O N Ieanal eI OYdirA .'�`_ �z 1, Q/y,�p, O�•'�tl'"v ..4 nLalQ Ne foG g Q.! 0 d, r •" A 4an l.w< >r.M tl 7%y !42'OB'Li u. or:�Ir>.F•L�l P-1, N I NBB•o3',S'E 1t, �N p .1(p'Ihie _eT-' 1 ,>• l 3saol ) J ar- ep�- O /4l L.4> 9 N .V9•L)L)i-W t)(.. '• Q� 111 5.;' .N61'Ji'fe"E 9oi.<G A�rcN Feq ?,� (QJ(¢,xN9v'a-.�=>4GIxo'T' �•;LS7(Nel•iagic wtwx¢a� > r+:.igi_,✓.rw�,6,:,o OWNER'S CERTIFICATE I---.O og->e• a.�.<. d� //°0.14 ! °., p.• ,Ysrto`•/o'u� �'�a'}' An 0v '. Csrtille°n a Ing tontunenrN reco.d.d M IM attics of the �` P P, .sf 9��( r° Suit. Cosner Rsear°.I on yys 2f•4j zo'wj J°P' ,198t , undsr ,i(.l.c> Z,o.00 •1/5 /325.(A NG'4!'4.E tib tx•I� •'L°1/l4 D p �t' t..e•)e NeL•fb �'%i ((l yNz"T1 Recorder's 9.r1o1 No. Orrrllleafes for lM Comfy Auditor ab N 69• �. ( XN y aa'os E 1st{.aT) f/x (F.YK)NL'4(:sae Lt6.4>X� a Y• °fJ b G tl ,b.� )� Clan of M.9eoro°f Srperulson on also beds concamll°r r / teYNs4•se•arc 1fG.M) /-+J <_�(,yy..� f it 1,c e�'sis x3.lw� (¢iyg.s•ars.-1 DETAIL'(3.. FI �m 'N4 a6'taW,33.41•.: Y .Lp✓ 5J•(' !? b. } /N O�l3I r _-__ -_ 5<waL I"•,e0' •t!• N ✓4$r!<.Cea..ea ri ( t, N4.4j41W/fa 4] ,1 l / to 0 ¢es.4/t r- ,cents ,W L+ ,5°/ C•0 IIJ a�° lvYs t,49 S) (•` �Y,s�x's4ablL LS 311L 43 Pt2 Ci) ¢oN nit L>a,eLm It t� ? Y('( l Z4.1 'l / I Y M AM(R,) W p N/6•ae'OdJ/+s-0{ P lR 6Sa'44'9!'Gx �n•9 ',6ID'L'N 1F4y546',/, (P yNrPei seder/ /1 1 193I>Y� Ntb't5'L/f tS6.tF T 24a•sc/ `N+ e'(p :to :N // (¢xNLB'zioa6 354.=IXOtp.7 4 ` Y/'j/r I ,.E. 1°400 . M N 1 / ,,,;e.,t�.+a • mb t t+t° I - / �:: (�Y 'oVT\• �e/.]t F:' B>'4s' Yc Iree.fo) C�-l'* '/� )YNr1.44•SYE) e Ree 9oDs - - _ - _ 0 nst A>n c(S).+.r 5ewecN,+woe Fea >.a p'1• I h? F.N,.o) c.[N.ra ors na(¢,) °'�•c' N•»r.K F No 9f°•,�f�1' °L N.Srw�c JN NOTES Ne .. PARCEL MAP � B��5 F g6A q,N43- NORTH L/NC OF NW:t OF N<%4 . Nc R,4Nr3 p Ai�F.{s<>,..rn 2� �° F Sc<. L) -NB9 So•p4"E As Pse 8!-q-bf. Aanx 7-OR•// ie Lc t} r 6,dt•oi O4' Qlr" A+OS LV,w^u,rYiJ,teT/e/ R.1>e.Dt aA' O+O[rlott! F ur0<eLNF•i A3 3••e.rN. .set:t7, FOR A-a/e'Rvl,•a L.,bs.B4 O-O<Narcy W a0-/¢ON v.Ac csscaa, pw=•f/L THE SAFOR CORPORATION 9r6L'.G',✓0.3G ./D.K'o, Ce / > L,tl trrw F�-¢cBAZ N89'fo'4c_ \SK.c< .-•. (I:)�Fh..Nerta LLTA A3$a 69-%-94 �Fl�2r,lcs0�.,V TMc '/.,,�>3 (vv vee eTL3 a a . Pas 53-4-_95 e. >.T, PARADISE PINES PROPERTY OWNERS as'G'sl q x1514) rD 6--o ices. (NB 3i S]`eYRf) (QJ)-Pa ne:5 o.r. A>Gca 38-.LL! ASSOCIATION,INC. 7. aA�t•,.1 ,fta.l.> 'fleNerav aaT,9 A3 PUL 4e•P/.>-G9 C ceNwar o>b Gco.,No rwwrss. 9 os Being Parcel 3 er 48'FYM•69 and Lot A as per 38-M.Olt, in Ne>•<r'st',N '{ ra Go.rrO ora>•Arcos. D 3' •,,,� ,�•t(a�, _ a Sections 26f 27 -123 N. - R. 3 E.-M.D.ReM ro• LF fh orn DA*a As Paz 99-hLo.¢-11 C•Nraano r FOX o, a (:¢4„ro v.lrs•Nccs. C¢)�r�".�v°srnE so�inrAGco✓No Gms ,+ca. JULY, 1983 +•L3'3 "W \�/ (Q)�D4N S P T4 A3 /s¢G5-%•40. 0'luno c 0. e%u,e.a.Wc] (p)-Dw.rce DuD D4 Te As ixJe 1944-oz/o(.. eON ueSitio ra aaa,No vsrw.Ncs. y, �. e.,•.e r' Butte Count California L, V�m �{ -- !eN K <a 166E M 771saE /O NO GV,OW<C >Y r Oarc-»^,i[e/q Ice °' S I�^ o c4) /S /or,cwelr 5z P LCLc�a /,z,s s4, Ce.l✓.�,>,DN Fw<ru,e-r..=rnr(+•v LIPPINCOTT-GUM ASSOCIATES • I a S_- SVSTr3 A[e uNS„rAe6< rN FC0D'sTnNcc,> r3r r•eo.o/rahm4sr PLANNERS b NM•uaw DETAIL yA- S.A, ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 100]BpMF„GW ILLE ROAD ADISLIFOf1A9590DO8]1 LAY. c i I Swc I"rloo' Sheet I of I Sheet(s) (els)e]]°Bn (a enssoo Jab No. g3-o3.3L AP 64-ol-ot,O,o TENTATIVE PARCEL. MAP SUBDIVISION MAP WAIVER APPLICATION APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their application packet. Please include this checklist along with you submittal. Applicant Planner 1. ❑ Completea, Pre-Application Review with the Environmental Health Division'for on-site sewage disposal requirements for the proposed use. The Environmental Health Division charges a fee for this review. 2. ❑ A completed, signed, Uniform Application and Environmental Information form. If the application i s s igned b y a n a gent f or t he owner, an a gent a uthorization f orm in ust b e submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. 3. B/ ❑ Payment of the currently required Application Fees and/or Deposits (Any unused portion of the deposit will be returned to the applicant upon final action). (Planner advises applicant) 4. ❑ A preliminary title report showing current ownership and dated within 6 months of the application submittal shall be filed with the application. 5. ❑ ❑ Twenty-two (22) copies of the map,including a detailed site plan drawn to scale, shall be submitted. Additional copies of the map shall be made available by the applicant or engineer/surveyor t o C ounty D epartments u pon r equest. A 11 in aps s hall b e d rawn o n uniform size sheets no less than 18"X 26". The finished map shall be folded to 8 %i"x 11". The detailed map must include: a. ❑ Name,business address of person who prepared the map. BUTTE b. COUNTY ❑ Proposed property lines and lot dimensions. MAY 2 4 2005 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED,THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. Applicant Planner C. E( ❑ Assessor Parcel Number(s). The street address (if available). Tract name and date, if applicable. d. ❑ Vicinity Map indicating the location of the land in relation to the nearest major roads, . significant topographic features, surrounding area or region. e. El"' ❑ Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed,public and private, improvements on the property(including,but not limited to,buildings,driveways,parking areas,wells, septic tanks, sewer lines, leach fields, utilities, and street lights.) f. Ef/ ❑ Wells which are to be abandoned shall be shown and identified as "well to be abandoned". The wells shall be properly abandoned under permit issued by the Butte County Division of Environmental Health. N A g. ❑ Buildings which are to be removed will be identified as"building to be removed". The buildings shall be properly removed or demolished under permit issued by the Butte County Building Division. NA h. ❑ The existing and proposed location, name, width, approximate grades and radii of curves of all roads, streets, highways for the subdivision and within 100 feet of the exterior boundaries thereof. All streets shall be labeled as to whether it is public or Private. 1. Ed ❑ Topographic contours and water features,at a minimum,to be as shown on the current USGS 7.5 minute quad map. j. Ef/ ❑ For subdivisions that have a density of 4 dwellings/ac or greater in the Urban Area or 1 acre lots or smaller in the Rural Area and which also have an average slope of 20 % or greater, a conceptual or preliminary grading plan shall be submitted showing the approximate finished pad elevations for each lot and all cut and fill slopes proposed which are 5 feet or greater in height. This requirement may be waived by the Director of Development Services if it is found not to be needed. t4 Waived ❑ YES ❑ NO k. E( ❑ Approximate location of all FEMA identified 109year floodplain areas,if any,and the location,width and direction of flow of all ephemeral water courses,if any. 2,6,.16- X OUT75117r 5cO Y641— f7-p:DD,PPLA1Ar IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED;THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 2 s , . � .'1 '� �.. i I � 1 �. Applicant Planner I. E� ❑ Sufficient information on the map to determine adequacy of the proposed drainage and flood control measures, including but not limited to, proposed easements, and facilities. m. E� ❑ The approximate widths, location and purpose of all known existing or proposed . PmP g P P easements. n. ❑ North arrow and scale of drawing. All maps shall be drawn to an engineering scale of a size sufficient to reasonably show all required features. A north arrow preferably oriented to the top of sheet. If not connecting to public sewer-and water, the following applies: 6. E5" ❑ Thero osed source of dome p p she water and proposed method of sewage disposal. If the project is not served by community sewer and/or community water, include soils/percolation/ground water data and water availability data sufficient to allow the Division of Environmental Health to complete their review of the project. Your application will be incomplete unless this information is provided or waived, in writing,by the Division of Environmental Health. Environmental Health Waived ❑ YES ❑ NO 7. ❑ A written request for any exceptions to the subdivision standards pursuant to Section 20-4 of the Butte County Code, if applicable.' r!A Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents,as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. Signature: Q lit Ntc,4ots Date: Sn .J �_A five r� Signature: Date: 2`S 0J Planner Receiving A lication K:\Planning\FORMS\Submittal\CHECKLIS\TT(2)B.WPD IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED,THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 3 Mr. Mark Michelena Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 March 3, 2006 Re: Request for Discretionary Refund Project TPM 05-25, AP#064-010-030 Dear Mr. Michelena: On November 8, 2005 I sent a letter to you regarding TPM 05-25, Parcel #064-010-030. 1 advised you in the letter that I wished to discontinue my efforts to subdivide the above property and gave my permission to the County to strike the project. I also stated that I had paid $5,062.00 to the County and requested a refund as the application was deemed incomplete. On December 2,20051 talked to you via telephone. You told me that almost no work had been done by the County on this project and agreed that this situation seemed to fit the criteria for a discretionary refund. I asked you to look into this situation for me and I told you.that I would like to request a discretionary refund. I have since been in contact with Mr. Pete Calarco. Per his e-mail of March 3, 2006, I am writing this letter to you to restate that I have withdrawn my application and that I request a refund. Thank-you for your prompt attention in this matter. I look forward to hearing from you. If I can be of further assistance or answer any questions please don't hesitate to call or e- mail. Sincerely, Roger Nichols 873-3542 home, 228-0052 cell rinichols@mybluelight.com e-mail BUTTE COUNT' MAR Q 6 Ko DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Roger Nichols BUTTE P.O. Box 512 COUNTY Paradise, CA 95967 NOV 15 2005 November 8, 2005 DEVELOPMENTSERVICES Mark Michelena Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: TPM 05-25 Mark, I have decided to discontinue my efforts to subdivide my property at AP 064-010-030 . and the County has my permission to strike this project from its records. It was designated TPM 05-25. My records show that I wrote a check for the fees in the amount of$5,062. Since the application was deemed incomplete because of the single access issue, can I expect a refund of any kind? Regards, Roger Nichols?-----�- i Page 1 of 1 M r Roger Nichols From: Calarco, Pete [PCalarco@buttecounty.net] Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 10:57 AM To: rjnichols@mybluelight.com Cc: Michelena, Mark Subject: RefundApplication0826031.pdf Roger, here's the form that we use. You will notice that it is geared towards a building permit refund but we use the same form for projects. Also, include a letter withdrawing the application and requesting the refund. I suggest addressing this to the project planner. A copy of the withdrawal letter will be placed in the file and the project planner will deliver the refund request to the appropriate staff member to process. Again, thank you for your patience. —pete 3/3/2006 _ � , .�.• .. � , _ - ���_iJ _. , Page 1 of 2 Roger Nichols From: Calarco, Pete [PCalarco@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 5:10 PM To: rjnichols@mybluelight.com Cc: Michelena, Mark; DeBrunner, Deborah; Snellings, Tim Subject: RE: Request for Discretionary Refund Project TPM 05-25, AP#064-010-030 Roger, I find myself behind again. To make a long story short, we will allow a request of refund on this flat fee type project. The refund amount will be determined by subtracting staff time, materials, and related processing costs from the total application fee filed with the Planning Division. I have not been able to confirm from the other departments what, if any, fee amount would be refundable. Again, I appreciate your patience on this subject. As you are aware, past practice has been to not allow refund requests on flat fee applications. We are working on a written internal policy on this subject so that further delays do not occur with similar requests in the future. --pete From: Roger Nichols [mailto:rjnichols@mybluelight.com] Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 5:41 PM To: Calarco, Pete Cc: rjnichols@mybluelight.com Subject: RE: Request for Discretionary Refund Project TPM 05-25, AP#064-010-030 Dear Mr. Calarco: Please consider this e-mail a gentle reminder regarding your e-mail of 1/18/06. 1 am still awaiting an answer or 'status for my request. Thank-you for your assistance in this matter. Roger Nichols From: Calarco, Pete [mailto:PCalarco@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:35 AM To: rjnichols@mybluelight.com Cc: Michelena, Mark; Snellings,Tim Subject: RE: Request for Discretionary Refund Project TPM 05-25, AP#064-010-030 Roger, thank you for the email. You have raised an issue that this department will clarify with your specific request and establish policy department-wide. I will also check if there are any forms to fill out and what . You may have heard that standing policy has been to not provide any refunds on fees considered "flat"fees. Since I am relatively new here, this is a subject that I will check into and provide confirmation -either refund or no refund. Please allow me a few more days to complete my review of this subject. I appreciate your patience on this and will return your email with specific direction or an update by the Monday, January 23. --pete From: rjnichols@mybluelight.com [mailto:rjnichols@mybluelight.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 9:19 AM To: Calarco, Pete Cc: Michelena, Mark Subject: Request for Discretionary Refund Project TPM 05-25, AP#064-010-030 Dear Mr. Calarco 3/3/2006 Page 2 of 2 On November 8, 2005 I sent a letter to Mark Michelena regarding TPM 05-25, Parcel #064-010-030. 1 advised Mr. Michelena in the letter that I wished to discontinue my efforts to subdivide the above property and gave my permission to the County to strike the project. I also stated that I had paid $5,062 to the County and requested a refund as the application was deemed incomplete. On December 2, 20051 talked to Mr. Michelena via telephone. He told me that almost no work had been done by the County on this project and agreed that this situation seemed to fit the criteria for a discretionary refund. I asked Mr. Michelena to look into this situation for me and I told him that I would like to request a discretionary refund. Although I have not heard anything to date, I have since learned that you are the appropriate person to make this request to. Therefore, please accept this e-mail as my formal request for you to approve a discretionary refund in this case. I am making this request as I was never told that refunds or partial refunds were not available once:fees were paid even though a project was withdrawn with little or no work done by the County. I also request a refund as I believe my project qualifies for a discretionary refund. Thank-you for your prompt attention.in this matter. I look forward to hearing from you. If I can be of further assistance or answer any questions please don't hesitate to call or e-mail. Sincerely, Roger Nichols 873-3542 home, 228-0052 cell rjnichols ,mby lueli hg t.com e-mail 3/3/2006 Page 1 of 2 Benedict, Gwyn From: Michelena, Mark Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:26 AM To: Lewellen, Diane; Benedict, Gwyn Cc: Calarco, Pete Subject: FW: Discretionary refund for project TPM 05-25, Parcel #064-010-030. Diane, Do you have any information on this refund (TPM 05-25)? Thank you. Mark From: Roger Nichols [mailto:rjnichols@mybluelight.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:10 AM To: Michelena, Mark Cc: rjnichols@mybiuelight.com Subject: RE: Discretionary refund for project TPM 05-25, Parcel #064-010-030. Mark: Did you here anything back from accounting? Its been awhile. Thanks, Roger Nichols From: Michelena, Mark [mailto:MMichelena@buttecounty.net] Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 9:22 AM To: rjnichols@mybluelight.com Subject: RE: Discretionary refund for project TPM 05-25, Parcel #064-010-030. Roger, Your submitted request (letter and county form) has been submitted to the accounting department. The person who processes those is on vacation this week so I can't ask her the status. I will email so she is aware that I'm asking about it. Thanks. Mark Michelena, Senior Planner Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division 7 County Center Drive,Oroville,CA 95965 530-538-7376,FAX:530-538-7785 From: Roger Nichols [mailto:rjnichols@mybluelight.com] 05/03/2006 Page 2 of 2 Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 8:13 PM To: Michelena, Mark Cc: rjnichols@mybluelight.com Subject: RE: Discretionary refund for project TPM 05-25, Parcel #064-010-030. Mark: Just thought I would check with you on the status of this refund. Our last e-mail was 3/14/06. Let me.know if I should be following up with someone else. Sincerely, Roger Nichols From: Michelena, Mark [mailto:MMichelena@buttecounty.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 9:03 AM To: rjnichols@mybluelight.com Cc: Calarco, Pete Subject: RE: Discretionary refund for project TPM 05-25, Parcel #064-010-030. Roger, Yes we did receive the paperwork to process the refund. I have forwarded the documents to the Assistant Director. I will follow-up and see where it is in the process. Thank you. Murk.Michelesza, Senior Planner Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division 7 County Center Drive,Oroville,CA 95965 530-538-7376,FAX:530-538-7785 From: Roger Nichols [mailto:dnichols@mybluelight.com] Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 8:20 PM. To: Michelena, Mark Cc: rjnichols@mybluelight.com Subject: Discretionary refund for project TPM 05-25, Parcel #064-010-030. Hello Mr. Michelena: am sorry to bother you but I need to confirm you received the paperwork to process the above refund and that the paperwork is complete. I would also like a time line for the refund if you know. I know you are busy so I won't call on the telephone but I believe e-mail is the most efficient means of communication with you. Please advise, Sincerely, Roger Nichols 05/03/2006 _ 7-7-777 •'.'° ' �Yw - ...... utte ount r' 'l.:A..ND '.O•F NAT-URAL. WEALTH AND BEAUTY .! 'V71 ; ;��y�rF��t9:;..r•.ys'.jj�����}a�"x,34�,E;I2•+'�N .. • ".', ... DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTALHEALTH March 29,2005 ❑202 Mira Loma Drive '[ 411 Main Street 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 P.O.Box 5364 Oroville,CA 95965 TEL: (530)538-7282. Chico,CA 95927 TEL: (530)538-7281 FAX,(530)538.2185 TEL-.'(530)891-2727 FAX; (530)538-7785 Roger L. Nichols FAX: (530)895.6512 P.O.Box 512 Paradise, CA. 95967 _ RE: Pre-Application'Review, Tentative Parcel Map;Roger Nichols, Tika Lane �/;AR .3 1 2 J' AP#064-010-030. Dear Mr.Nichols: . This office has reviewed your application as indicated above. The following is an analysis of that review. Project: Split an existing 40.55 acre lot into.(4) 10 acre+/-parcels. Location: Tika Ln.? approximately 1%4 mile South.from Nimshew Rd.,Magalia • . ^ BUTTE • Applicant: Roger L.Nichols COUNTY MAY 2' 4 2005 Report of Findings: DESERA ENT Soil Investigation Based upon known soil depth-and conditions in the area soil pits.will not be required. Usable area requirements set forth in Appendix VII for sewage disposal areas appear to have been met. PERCS WILL BE REOUIRED ON EACH INDIVIDUAL PARCEL AT THE TIIVIE OF DEVELOPMENT PER CSAR. Water Supply—To be supplied by individual water well. PROOF OF WATER WILL BE REQUIRED. _ Suggested Conditions 1. Domestic wells will not be located within 100 feet of designated sewage disposal areas. 2. Show designated sewage disposal areas on an-additional map sheet. 3. Show areas with slope greater • sop great than 30%.to be unsuitable for sewage disposal. . Page 2 March 29, 2005 4. Show 50' setbacks from,all drainages and x100' setback from any year round creek/canal. This review should not be construed.as a blanket approval of your project since participation in the County Parcel Map process may change the project due to other agency requirements. When you do apply for your map at.the Planning Department,the remainder of your fee for Environmental Health services will be$1041.50. -However,you must have your Pre-Application Review receipt available at the time you make application. This letter concludes this Department's review of your pre-application. If you have any . questions,please contact the.Chico office listed above between,8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m:,Monday through Friday. Sincer y, Darren Jones,R.E.H. . Division of Environmeptal Health ' DJ/gl/land/preapp/response/tika tpm Cc; Northstar Engineering NorthStar ENGINEERING Civil Engineers-Planners•Surveyors TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FROM: Chris Tolley Doug Sutherland COMPANY: DATE: Butte County Planning 5/26/2005 14:44 ADDRESS: JOB NUMBER: 8881 7 County Center Dr. Oroville CA 95965 PROJECT: TRANSMITTING THE FOLLOWING: Nichols TPM Archaeological fee [—]URGENT ❑FOR REVIEW ❑PLEASE COMMENT ❑PLEASE REPLY PLEASE RECYCLE NOTES/COMMENTS: Chris, Enclosed is the Archaeological records check package you requested. Included are: 1 Agreement 1 Portion of USGS "Paradise East" Quad Map 1 Check, $60.00 payable to NEIC (North East Information Center) Please forward the NEIC response.when received. Thank you. COUNTY Doug Sutherland, PLS 7970 MAY 2 7 2005 Assistant Surveyor .DEVELOPMENT dsutherland@northstareng.com SERVICES 20 DECLARATION DRIVE CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 530-893-1600 FAX-893-2113 i O O o -- �._`a =.-= o emoran um oc-- --- �o OU N'( TO: Northeast Information Center California State University, Chico Building 25, Room 201 Chico, California 95929-0377 FROM: Mark Michelena SUBJECT: Request for Archaeological/Cultural Resources Records Review Nichols, TPM 05-25, APN 064-010-030 DATE: June 7, 2005 Attached please find an agreement and $60.00 fee for a cultural resources record review for the referenced project. Please provide your findings to the project planner listed above within 14 days of your receipt of this request. Send your correspondence to: Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Should you have any questions please contact the project planner. Thank you for your attention to this matter. K:\Planning\PROJECTS\TPM\NICHOLS TPM 05-25\Nichols TPM 05-25 MEMO-NEIC.doc Agreement For Butte County Archaeological Resources Project Review By The Northeast Information Center(NEIC) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is the California State statute that requires the Butte County Department of Development Services to perform an environmental review on all discretionary land use projects, to identify the significant environmental impacts of the project and to avoid or mitigate those impacts, if feasible. Every development project which requires a discretionary governmental approval will require at least some environmental review pursuant to CEQA, unless an exemption applies. The environmental review required imposes both procedural and substantive requirements. At a minimum, an initial review of the project and its environmental effects must be conducted. Depending upon the potential effects, a further and more substantial review may be conducted in the form of an environmental impact report (EIR). A project may not be approved if feasible alternatives or mitigation measures cannot substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of the project. At the state level, CEQA requires that public agencies consider the effects of their actions on historical resources eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources. "Historical resource" refers to buildings, structures, sites (prehistoric and historic), objects, districts, and all manner of properties containing material remains of past human life or activity. The Department of Development Services utilizes the Northeast Information Center (NEIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) to identify projects that may have archaeological significance. The CHRIS is a statewide system for managing information on the full range of historical resources identified in California. This system is under the authority and direction of the Office of Historic Preservation (OHP), the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), and the State Historical Resources Commission (SHRC). The Northeast Center of the CHRIS system, located at California State University, Chico, manages the historical resource records for 11 counties, including Butte County. The Northeast Information Center will furnish a Record Search to Development Services indicating the archaeological/historical significance and sensitivity of the applicant's project area and additionally providing a recommendation as to whether further archaeological survey is warranted. If further archaeological survey is required, the application would be considered incomplete until the appropriate archaeological survey is completed and reviewed. The Department of Development Services will forward applicant's payment (by check) of $60.00 and relevant project application information required for the Records Search to NEIC. NEIC will provide the results of the Records Search to Development Services. Development Services will notify the applicant if further archaeological survey is warranted. The $60.00 fee does not cover the cost of further archaeological survey work. If further archaeological survey work is required, Development Services will work with the applicant to see that it is accomplished, according to set standards, by a qualified archaeologist. The applicant shall bear all costs associated with further archaeological survey work required to continue processing of the planning project application. THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF A 7.5' TOPO MAP, WITH THE PROJECT AREA OUTLINED. THIS IS USED DURING THE REVIEW TO RESEARCH CULTURAL SITES. The undersigned applicant for the project as identified below has read and understood the Butte County Archaeological Resources Project Review process and agrees to fund the required Record Search to be provided by NEIC. Attached is a check for $60.00 made payable to the Northeast Information Center for NEIC to perform the Records Search. Failure of payment to NEIC for this Records Search would result in the planning project application to be considered incomplete until payment of the $60.00 Records Search fee along with any related fees associated with non- payment(returned check charges, etc.) d in full to NEIC. 5 . 2CP s Applicant ignature / / Date F6c l2 O&e:4_ k_ !Glk�t-S Applicant PRINTED Name 532,0 Check Number W a,.(K CADocuments and Settings\dsutherland\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK5nLJNIFORMAPPLICAT10NFinal.doc Page 3 of 4 L 4 Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services u T tF YVONNE CHRISTOPHER,DIRECTOR o 0 0 0 0 0 7 County Center Drive o Oroville,CA 95965 0 =-= =�� o (530)538-7601 Telephone CDU N'�y (530)538.7785 Facsimile ADMINISTRATION *BUILDING * GIS*PLANNING June 6, 2005 Rodger Nichols P.O. Box 512 Paradise, CA, 95967 Re: Tentative Parcel Map, TPM 05-25, 064-010-030 Dear Mr. Nichols In an effort to keep our customers informed, we are notifying all applicants of their current status and assigned planner. This is to inform you that your project has been assigned to Mark Michelena and he can be reached at 538-7376, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Your project is being reviewed for completeness. Should you have any questions regarding your application, please call the planner listed above. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant Cc: Northstar Engineering, 20 Declaration Drive, Chico, CA 95973 5 � f I I � i r i t� "DRAFT"LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: O,S—^ 2 AP# 06 D?O APPLICANT: OWNER: ( � REPRESENTATIVE: O rt. PROPOSED F,EQUY-ST: (to be filled out by person taking in application) Tv fikot �! Q! FINAL REQUEST: (to be filled out by project planner) -7'0 9fyly6 4 c2u- 4AAc c� SIZE: �s• e �e��S LOCT ON: cti - 0 ' k_O S'o,yt- sed.'_ a,r-- fi.IGG U�AU, •4,44-04e(4 0;��jn�L?i� Sou`1-Gt �eeta�, / �/�OC SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT# EXISTING ZONING: +P 2 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ASSIGNED PLANNER: Ij'I/I,/(�. PLANNER'S INITIALS. Date Application Received 5 • Z C- 01'- Date Proiect Assigned ! S- 3f- 05- IDR 5IDR Date r0 • !s' 05 30 Day Complete Tentative Hearing Date KAPlanningTormsEead In Sheet.doc COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST County ffices and Cities: hie Administrative Officer X evelop.Services Director _Public Works Director ironmental Health Assessor X Building Manager heriff _BCAG _ALUC LAFCo _Air Quality Mgmt. _Bu 'Co.Farm Bureau _Biggs — _GridleyAgricultural ico _ roville �C Paradise ico Airport Commission Information Systems Dept. _Animal Control Commission X County Counsel Irrigation District: _Butte Water —Biggs/W.Gridley Water _Durham Irrigation _South Feather Water&Power Agency Paradise Irrigation _Richvale Irrigation Table Mountain Irrigation _Thermalito Irrigation District _Other Domestic Water _Butte Water District _California Water Service Co. _Del Oro Water Co. _OWID _Thermalito Irrigation District _Other Sewer _Butte Water District _Themalito Irrigation _Sterling City Sewer Main Skansen Subdivision(CSA 21) _L.O.A.PUD /Fi rotectlon Califomia Department of Forestry _EI Medio Fire Protection District ;,re ion Districts Chico Area Recreation _Durham Area Recreation _Feather River Rec.&Park Paradise Recreation&Park Richvale Recreation &Parks Utilities PG&E _Chambers Cable TV _SBC Viacom Cable TV State Agencies _ rans(Traffic) X Dept.of water Resources Dept.of Fish and Game orestry(Attn:Craig Carter) _Dept of Parks and Rec. _Highway Patrol CA Reg.Water Quality Control Board _Caltrans,Aeronautics Program _Office of Governmental&Env.Relations _Department of Conservation _Office of Mining Reclamation _Dept.Social Services,Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies _US Forest Service _US Bureau of Land Management _US Fish&Wildlife Service Army Corps of Engineers _National Marine Fisheries Service Other Districts,Agencies,Committees,etc. _Lime Saddle Dist _Community Association /ch;oolDistricts Drainage _Butte Env.l Council a (( ` _Reclamation _Cal Native Plant Society. d �G Vidl�o� _Butte Co.Mining Committee _Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. _Butte Creek Watershed Conservancy _Mosquito Abatement District. K:\Planning\Forms\DISTR.wpd Butte County Department of Development Services PLANNING DIVISION ,�uTrF0 0 0 7 County Center Drive o _ �/� o Oroville,CA 95965 ° _s .r� ° (530)538-7601 Telephone cC .�' (530) 538-7785 Facsimile �UN'� Date June 6, 2005 TO: FROM: Mark Michelena, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: RodgerNicholsTentative Parcel MapTPM 05-25 APN: 064-010-030 DATE OF Inter-Departmental Review: 6/15/2005 IDR RESPONSE REGARDING COMPLETENESS OF APPLICATION DUE BY: June 13, 2005 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS/MITIGATION MEASURES DUE BY: June 30, 2005 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the . completeness of this application, to be determined at the Inter-Departmental Review (IDR) Committee meeting on 6/15/2005, and/or to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To divide a 40+/- acre property into four 10 acre properties. PROJECT LOCATION: on the south side of Tika Lane, approximately 0.4 miles south of Nimshew Road, Magalia.. COUNTY SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO.: 5 ZONING: AR-2-1/2((Agricultural-Residential, 2-1/2-acre parcels)) GENERAL PLAN: AR(Agricultural Residential) If a response cannot be submitted prior to the due dates listed above, please call Mark Michelena . at (530) 538-(530) 873-3542 or send him an email at Mmichelena@buttecounty.net. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. IDR COMMITTEE =APPLICATION,COMPLETE: ❑ No (Please send response to Mark Michelenaby June 13, 2005) Yes (Conditions/mitigation measures due by June 30, 2005) Butte County Department of Development Services �vTTF YVONNE CHRISTOPHER,DIRECTOR o ( o ' 0 0 7 County Center Drive o /� o Oroville,CA 95965 0 - ��v c (530)538-7601 Telephone �+ y (530)5384785 Facsimile DUN'S ADMINISTRATION*BUILDING*GIS*PLANNING June 22,2005 Roger Nichols P.O.Box 512 Paradise,CA 95967 Re: Application completeness—Nichols Tentative Parcel Map,TPM 05-25 APN 064-010-030 Dear Mr.Nichols, Thank you for the submittal of the above referenced application. The project application and related items have been reviewed by County Agencies in order to determine if the application is complete and. contains the information necessary to process the request. Your application has been deemed incomplete at this time due to the following: 1. Access to the parcel is from Tika Lane,which is seryiced by Nimshew Road. It has been determined that the road that provided access,Nimshew Road, is a dead end road and serves more than 20 parcels,of which some are under 20 acres.Under Butte County Code 20-133,no cul-de- sac, in a rural area, shall provide sole legal access to more than twenty(20)parcels,except where all parcels are more than twenty(20)acres in lot area,or circulation is not practical or feasible because of topography.(Ord.No.3188, § 1(Exh.A),3-14-95) There are two ways to handle this,the.first is to provide a second point of access to a publicly maintained road, or second, is to ask for an exception to the design requirements per Butte County Code 20-4: The hearing body in an action relative to a matter before it may authorize exceptions to any of the requirements and regulations relative to the design of a subdivision.. (1)Application.Application for any such exception shall be made by a verified petition of the subdivider or designated agent, stating fully the grounds of the application and the facts relied upon by the petitioner.In order for the property referred to in the petition to come within the provisions of this section,the hearing body must find that all of the following facts apply with respect to the subject property: a. That there are special circumstances or conditions of topography or size or shape or location or existing development affecting the property,which circumstances,conditions or development existed at the time the application for the map was determined or deemed to be complete. b. That the granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the territory in which the property is situated. Page 1 of 2 (2)Appeals.All determinations of the advisory agency may be appealed to the board of supervisors. (Ord.No. 3188, § I(Exh. A),3-14-95) 2. Butte County Department of Environmental Health has determined that proof of adequate quantities of water is required. Please contact Butte County Environmental Health at(530) 891- 2727 up to July 3, 2005 .or (530)0538-7281 beginning July 5, 2005 to complete and submit necessary information. Additional issue you should'be made aware of is the fire safety and evacuation concerns present in the Upper Paradise Ridge and Magalia area which will need to be addressed in any development project in this area. This is a significant environmental impact that must be mitigated. The best mitigation under consideration is alternative access to SR-32. If you have any additional questions,please contact me at(530) 538-7376. Sincerely, Mark Michelena Associate Planner cc: NorthStar Engineering Page 2 of 2 t ��`,.� - t BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 (530)538-7601 (530)538-7785 FAX Fax To: NorthStar Engineering From: Mark Michelena Fax: (530)893-2113 Pages: 3(Including cover page) Phone: (530)893-1600 Date: 6/22/2005 Re: 064-010-030; Nichols TPM 05-25 CC: ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle NorthStar Engineering, Please find attached a copy of the incomplete letter for the Nichols TPM 05-25. I will be mailing out a hard copy today. Sincerely, Mark Michelena Associate Planner 4 IDR Meeting Project Date Issues: Department--..__ _..._...... ... _ . ..... . _.-. . :.....Issues...... : .............. ........... ... .. . _.. ...Decision-. . .... . Planning CDF Caw Building Ag Commissioner c� Public Works Env Health Assessor County Counsel Mr. Mark Michelena Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 March 3, 2006 Re: Request for Discretionary Refund Project TPM 05-25, AP#064-010-030 Dear Mr. Michelena: On Nove,-nber 8, 2005 I sent a letter to you regarding TPM 05-25, Parcel #064-010-030. I advised you in the letter that I wished to discontinue my efforts to subdivide the above property and gave my permission to the County to strike the project. I also stated that I had paid $5,062.00 to the County and requested a refund as the application was deemed incomplete. On December 2, 2005 I talked to you via telephone. You told me that almost no work had been done by the County on this project and agreed that this situation seemed to fit the criteria for a discretionary refund. I asked you to look into this situation forme and I told you.that I would like to request a discretionary refund. I have since been in contact with Mr. Pete Calarco. Per his e-mail of March 3, 2006, I am writing this letter to you to restate that I have withdrawn my application and that I request a refund. Thank-you for your prompt attention in this matter. I look forward to hearing from you. If I can be of further assistance or answer any questions please don't hesitate to call or e- mail. Sincerely, Ni C.� Roger Nichols 873-3542 home, 228-0052 cell rinicii.ols@mybluelight.com e-mail ,j BUTTE COUTNI Y DEVELOPMEN'r SERVICES Roger Nichols P.O. Box 512 Paradise, CA 95967 November 8, 2005 Mark Michelena Development Services J County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: TPM 05-25 Mark, I have decided to discontinue my efforts to subdivide my property at AP 064-010-030 and the County has my permission to strike this project from its records. It was designated TPM 05-25. My records show that I wrote a check for the fees in the amount of$5,062. Since the application was deemed incomplete because of the single access issue,can I expect a refund of any kind? Regards, G�=-2. s��- ..SLS Roger Nichols ��- - ° Butte County Department of Development Services ° Building Division ° ~ ° ° 7 County Center Drive cotiN�y Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7541 REFUND REQUEST APPLICATION REFUND POLICY-Butte County Code 3-41(t) 1. Refunds can only be made upon written request by the person who paid the fees,whose name is on t he receipt issued for the fees paid. Any refund checks will be made payable to the name on the receipt. 2. The request must be made within two years from the date of fee payments on permits not issued,and two years from the date of permit issuance for permits issued-if no construction work has been done. 3. Filing fees and plan check fees for work plans checked are not refundable. 4. Fees paid to other County Departments are not covered by this claim. INSTRUCTIONS: Submit this application to Development Services for determination of refundable fees. A claim will be generated for any fees to be refunded and sent to the address below for signature(by the person whose name is on the receipt)and return to Development Services for payment processing. CLAIMANT'S NAME: J C ;7vi c S MAILING ADDRESS: �. �0 i2A D- sS— S 6 PHONE: ) 73- y . : ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: © 6 LI D I D -: 030 ' [Please use one claim form per permit.] i BLDG PERMIT NO.: Receipt No. 1 Receipt No. 2 Receipt No. 3 RECEIPT NO.: RECEIPT DATE: RECEIPT AMOUNT: ' 5,o(eLq Op REASON FOR REFUND REQUEST: I-4AVc W1i-11-0,2Awr) MY 1 tCPVt:S Tb Pa z C'�L S"f 11 f M y. 1a.)P r 2 r`/ . P,20 j Cr- Nu,n:9 a--/Z. Xs L tE M_,,z Myo E• MAS , Check those fees which you wish to have considered for refund: =Building Permit Fees =Sheriff Fees =SRA Fees (CDF Fire Planning) Other(specify): 6 6S PM- O.5;7,A ' Plans for cancelled permits will be disposed of within 10 working days upon submission of a Request for Refund. If you want the plans, you may ick them up prior to that time. N o /03�0 6 Signature - _ Date K:/Fdrrrt57f�efund Appli_cation 082203 • Page 1 of 1 Roger Nichols From: Calarco, Pete [PCalarco@buttecounty.net] Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 10:57 AM To: rjnichols@mybluelight.com Cc: Michelena, Mark Subject: RefundApplication0826031.pdf Roger, here's the form that we use. You will notice that it is geared towards a building permit refund but we use the same form for projects. Also, include a letter withdrawing the application and requesting the refund. I suggest addressing this to the project planner. A copy of the withdrawal letter will be placed in the file and the project planner will deliver the refund request to the appropriate staff member to process. Again, thank you for your, patience. —pete 3/3/2006 • Page 1 of 2 Roger Nichols From: Calarco, Pete [PCalarco@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 5:10 PM To: rjnichols@mybluelight.com Cc: Michelena, Mark; DeBrunner, Deborah; Snellings, Tim Subject: RE: Request for Discretionary Refund Project TPM 05-25, AP#064-010-030 Roger, I find myself behind again. To make a long story short, we will allow a request of refund on this flat fee type project. The refund amount will be determined by subtracting staff time, materials, and related processing costs from the total application fee filed with the Planning Division. I have not been able to confirm from the other departments what, if any, fee amount would be refundable. Again, I appreciate your patience on this subject. As you are aware, past practice has been to not allow refund requests on flat fee applications. We are working on a written internal policy on this subject so that further delays do not occur with similar requests in the future. --pete From: Roger Nichols [mailto:rjnichols@mybluelight.com] Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 5:41 PM To: Calarco, Pete Cc: rjnichols@mybluelight.com Subject: RE: Request for Discretionary Refund Project TPM 05-25, AP#064-010-030 Dear Mr. Calarco: Please consider this e-mail a gentle reminder regarding your e-mail of 1/18/06. 1 am still awaiting an answer or status for my request. Thank-you for your assistance in this matter. Roger Nichols From: Calarco, Pete [mailto:PCalarco@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:35 AM To: rjnichols@mybluelight.com Cc: Michelena,,Mark; Snellings,Tim Subject: RE: Request for Discretionary Refund Project TPM 05-25, AP#064-010-030 Roger, thank you for the email. You have raised an issue that this department will clarify with your specific request and establish policy department-wide. I will also check if there are any forms to fill out and what. You may have heard that standing policy has been to not provide any refunds on fees considered "flat'fees. Since I am relatively new here, this is a subject that I will check into and provide confirmation -either refund or no refund. Please allow me a few more days to complete my review of this subject. I appreciate your patience on this and will return your email with specific direction or an update by the Monday, January 23. —Pete From: rjnichols@mybluelight.com [mailto:rjnichols@mybluelight.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 9:19 AM To: Calarco, Pete Cc: Michelena, Mark Subject: Request for Discretionary Refund Project TPM 05-25, AP#064-010-030 Dear Mr. Calarco 3/3/2006 Page 2 of 2 On November 8, 2005 I sent a letter to Mark Michelena regarding TPM 05-25, Parcel #064-010-030. I advised Mr. Michelena in the-letter that I wished to discontinue my efforts to subdivide the above property and gave my permission to the County to strike the project. I also stated that I had paid $5,062 to the County and requested a refund as the application was deemed incomplete. On December 2, 2005 I talked to Mr.Michelena via telephone. He told me that almost no work had been done by the County on this project and agreed that this situation seemed to fit the criteria for a discretionary refund. I asked Mr. Michelena to look into this situation for me and I told him that I would like to request a discretionary refund. Although I have not heard anything to date, I have since learned that you are the appropriate person to make this request to. Therefore, please accept this e-mail as my formal request for you to approve a discretionary refund in this case. I am making this request as I was never told that refunds or partial refunds were not available once fees . were paid even though a project was withdrawn with little or no work done by the County. I also request a refund as I believe my project qualifies for a discretionary refund. Thank-you for your prompt attention.in this matter. I look forward to hearing from you. If I can be of further assistance or answer any questions please don't hesitate to call or e-mail. Sincerely, Roger Nichols 873-3542 home, 228-0052 cell rjnichols myblueli hg t.com e-mail 3/3/2006 y ate onnt _ IAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND 3EAUT ''! �-� LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916)538-7266 FAX:(916) 538-2140 May 10, 1994 Sierra West - Surveying RE: AP 66-52-02 5437 Black Olive Dr . Tentative Parcel Map Appeal Paradise, CA 95969 for Bob Woodworth Gentlemen: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors held May 10, 1994, the Board denied your appeal finding that there are traffic and transportation concerns in the upper ridge area which must be mitigated, and that this site appears to have significant archaeological artifacts which require some type of protection. .Further, finding that the existence and type of traffic concerns indicate this project does not conform to the Land Use Element and Circulation Element of the Butte County General Plan . The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094. 6 Judicial review must be sought not later than the '90th day following the date on which this decision becomes final , except that where a shorter time limit is. provided by State or Federal law, such shorter time limit shall apply. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact this office at 916-538-7266, Monday through Thursday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Very truly yours, Stuart Edell Manager, Land Development Division SE/kp cc: Planning Division Environmental Health Department Clerk of the Board Bob Woodworth .. BUTTE ealifornia State University,Chico Northeast Center of tie GLENN SIERRA . Building 25,Suite 201, LASSEN SISKIYOU Chico,California 95929-0377 California.Histo.cal Resources MODOc SUTTER Phone (530) 898-6256 TEHAMA T�lforinaton System SHASTA SHASTA TRINITY tFax (530) 898-4413 neinfocntr@csuchico.edu July 27, 2005 BUTTE Department of Development Services COUNTY Planning Division JUL 2 9 2005 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 DEVELOPMENT ATTN: Mr. Mark Michelena SERVICES I.C. File#L05-3 Project Review RE: TPM 05-025/Nichols/APN: 064-010-030 T23N, R3E, Section 27; USGS Paradise East 7.5' and Paradise 15' quads Approximately 40 acres (estimated from map) (Butte County) Dear Mr. Michelena, In response to your request, a record search for the above-cited project was conducted by examining the official maps and records for archaeological sites in Butte County. RESULTS: Prehistoric Resources: According to our records, no sites of this type have been recorded in the project area. However, six sites of this type have been recorded in the project vicinity, consisting of bedrock metates, bedrock mortars, lithic scatters, mano fragments, a biface, and a protohistoric burial/cry ceremonial location. The project area is located in a region utilized by Konkow Maidu. Unrecorded cultural resources of this type may be located within the project area. Historic Resources: According to out records, one site of this type, PO4-001363, has been recorded in the project area, consisting of a refuse deposit. Additionally, thirteen sites of this type have been recorded in.the project vicinity, consisting of Ponderosa Way, the remains of Roe School, Upper Centerville Canal, Hupp Ditch, structure remains, refuse deposits, and water conveyance ditches. Unrecorded resources of this type may be located in the project area. The USGS Paradise (1953) 15' quad map indicates that the project area is located on Nimshew Ridge and in Slaughterhouse Ravine, while Middle Butte Creek,Paradise Pines, Magalia, Irish Town,Nimshew, a picnic area, trails, roads, and structures are located in the project vicinity. Previous Archaeological Investigations: According to our records,portions of the project area have been surveyed by registered professional foresters. The reports are listed below: ` Calvert, Jeff 1999 Confidential Archaeological Addendum for Timber Operations on Non Federal Lands in California: Nimshew 11 THP (I. C. Report# 2488). One refuse deposit was updated in the project vicinity as a result of this survey. Rieger, Larry 1994 Confidential Archaeological and Historical Resources Survey and Impact Assessment, A Supplemental Report for a Timber Harvesting Plan: Nimshew THP (I. C. Report#2909). PO4-01363 was recorded in the project area, and a refuse deposit was recorded in the project vicinity, as a result of this survey. Literature Search: Reviewed were the official records and maps for archaeological sites and surveys in Butte County. Also reviewed were the National Register of Historic Places -Listed properties and Determined Eligible Properties (1988,.Computer Listings 1966 through 7-00 by National Park Service), the California Register of Historical Resources (2005),California Points of Historical Interest(1992), California Inventory of Historic Resources (1976), California Historical Landmarks (1996), Directory of Properties in the Historic Property Data File for Butte County(2005), Handbook of North American Indians,Vol. 8, California (1978), Historic Spots in California (1966), and Gold Districts of California (1970). RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the above information and the local topography, the project is located in an area considered to be extremely sensitive for historic and prehistoric cultural resources. PO4-001363 is located in the project area. Therefore,we recommend that a professional archaeologist be contacted to conduct a cultural resources survey of the entire project area. This person will be able to offer recommendations for mitigation of the existing site, as well as protection or integration of any new cultural resources encountered as a result of the field survey. The project archaeologist should also contact the appropriate local Native American representatives for information regarding unrecorded Traditional Cultural Properties that may be located within project boundaries for which we have no records. The project archaeologist may also want to consult historic General Land Office (GLO)plat maps in order to aid in the identification of unrecorded historic sites, which may be located within project boundaries. Copies of the reports listed above will be available to the project archaeologist upon request. Additionally, if any potential prehistoric, ethnographic, and/or historic cultural resources are encountered during any phase of project operations, all work should cease in the area of the find pending an examination of the site and materials by the project archaeologist. This request to cease work in the area of a potential cultural.resource find should be made a condition of project approval. Thank you for your concern in preserving California's cultural heritage, and please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or need any further information or assistance. Sincerely, . Roeder, B.A. NEIC Staff J MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Board of Supervisors FROM: Stuart Edell, Manager, Land Development Division, Department of Development Services SUBJECT: Sierra West Surveying on behalf of Bob Woodworth appeal of. Development Review Committee denial of a Tentative Parcel Map on AP 066-520-002 DATE: April 28, 1994 FOR: Board Hearing May 10, 1994 at 10:00 a.m. BACKGROUND: At its meeting of March 7, 1994 the Development 'Review Committee denied the Bob Woodworth tentative parcel map based upon traffic and archaeological concerns which had not been addressed and which the applicant's representative appeared unwilling to address. The applicants have appealed this denial. - The traffic concerns were first addressed by the Board of Supervisors on March 17, 1987, when it established the transportation task force on the upper ridge and charged it with studying the problems of traffic and transportation. This led to an identified Environmental Impact which must be mitigated before development can occur. One method of developing mitigation measures is to have a focused EIR prepared which identifies the impacts, develops a capital improvement program and pro rata fee schedule to mitigate those impacts. To this date a preliminary traffic study has been prepared but no capitol improvement program has been developed. Traffic concerns on Nimshew Road and Ponderosa Way have been reported by several of the neighbors. Sierra West Surveying is aware of the traffic concerns based on.previous involvement in the area. On August 6, 1991 Sierra West appealed the denial of the Ron Robbins tentative parcel map. The Board denied the appeal finding "that the project does.not conform to the land use element and circulation element of the Butte County General Plan". Staff has also discussed the traffic impact issues on the ridge, informally with Sierra West on several occasions. Board of Supervisors April.28, 1994. RE: Woodworth.Appeal - TPM - AP 66-52-02 Page 2 of 2 The archaeological concerns are based on an August 25, 1993 report, from Donald J. Storm Archaeologist, that " a historic Maidu Indian cemetery exists within this parcel". This followed by a letter and map from Fred H. Wilson identifying the approximate location of the Cemetery. The proposal from the Planning Division is for the applicant to contact the Northeast Regional Information Center at CSU Chico, which serves as the areas clearinghouse, for a records search. If the clearinghouse has already identified sites it may be possible to propose mitigation measures to resolve the situation. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to deny the appeal finding that there are traffic and transportation concerns in the upper ridge area which must be mitigated,and that this site appears to have significant archaeological artifacts which require some type of protection. Further, find that the existence and type of traffic concerns indicate this project does not conform to the Land Use Element and Circulation Element of the Butte County General Plan. Attachments: A: Application B: Comments received relative to the hearing C: Development Review Committee Documents Reviewed and submitted by: William F rre AICP, Director of Development Services SE/kp ount I;utte - -.�� IL ti N; O ,F �,i :4 T U R ,a L N E a , r ,. AN D 3 E A U - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE-OROVILLE,•CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916)538-7601 September 8, 1993 Tom Wrinkle Sierra West Surveying 5437 Black Olive Drive Paradise, CA 95969 RE: Woodworth TPM, AP #066-520-002 Dear Tom: In response to your letter. dated Sept. 3, 1993, listing 5 proposal items: 1. Alternative access routes:' Not a viable solution to mitigate traffic impacts. There is no method to enforce this upon future parcel owners, or even upon Mr. Woodworth's guests. 2. Same proposal as item #1. 3. Payment of mitigation fees; There are no established traffic mitigation fees for this Y 9 9 area, therefore no method of.collection. Also, there is no project established to spend the fee on, even if collected. S , h 4. Existing parcels have an acknowledged right to develop. The traffic generated by existing parcels has been considered. It is the creation of additional parcels that compounds the existing situation to an unacceptable degree. The restriction, in this case, is not on the.ability to develop this parcel. It is on the ability to create additional parcels. 5. The General Plan Conformance Report is just that, a check to see if. the project conforms to the goals and objectives set forth in the General Plan. The parcel zoning is also an independent item from traffic review. Traffic review is an environmental aspect of parcel creation. Only the Planning Division reviews the environmental impacts of the proposed action, not the Health Dept. Fire Dept., nor any other county office. To reiterate, I missed the traffic impact on my first review. The oversight was caught prior to the Development Review Committee hearing, Page 2 September 8, 1993 . -Woodworth Parcel Map allowing me to revise the initial study. Even if it had gone to the Development Review Committee unrevised, the project would have been continued at that time to allow for the revision. This would only have resulted in additional delay to reach this same point. The impact of traffic in the Upper Ridge area of Paradise has been a longtime issue, still unresolved. The Town of Paradise is facing,the same issues and will either develop mitigation fees or prohibit any further parcel splits. This is an issue that will not be easily resolved. I hope this answers your questions and clarifies the issues to be addressed. Very truly yours, Lisa Purvis Wilson Assitant Planner LPW:ds SIERRA WEST SURVEYING = f} LICENSED LAND SURVEYING 4`k 5437 Black Olive Drive-Paradise,CA 95969 =_ Phone:(916)877-6253 ----_—_-- -- _ - --_ — September 3, 1993 County of Butte - Development Review Committee RE: Woodworth Parcel Map 7 County Center Drive APN: 66-52-02 Oroville, CA 95965 •J�yDear Members, As per your request in the Review Hearing of August 30, 1993 I will outline our proposal : 1 . Presently, access to the property can be gained via two routes : a. From Paradise up Skyway to Nimshew Road to Ponderosa Way; and • b. Lower Skyway to Centerville Road to Nimshew and Ponderosa Way 2 . Our proposal is to use these routes to. access the property . 3 . We agree to pay established mitigation fees for road impacts (the bridge replacement on Nimshew Road) . 4 . It is our opinion if you want to place any restrictions or -requirements on the development of this property, it must be applied to all properties north of Paradise in the County. This means all Building Permits , Use Permits , Site Plan Approvals , etc . 5 . It must also be noted that on our original development review request (General Plan and Zoning Conformance Request) all cor- respondence we received. from the Butte County Planning Department prior to the letter dated August 2 , 1993 and all correspondence from the Butte County Public Works Department, the Butte County Health Department , the Butte County Fire Department and any of many County Departments that have reviewed this application, nothing ever was mentioned before or after submittal of this project , this issue of Skyway impacts.. It is simply unfair that this applicant was •allowed to spend a large sum of money processing this project only to find out at the last minute he would , be required to personally answer the Skyway traffic problem when other County applications are routinely processed. The Town of Paradise continues to develop properties without such a study. We sincerely hope you let this individual develop his property as requested and will agree to work with you in any way we can. CONTINUED Page 2 September 3, :1993 RE: Woodworth Parcel Map Thank you for your consideration . in this matter. Sincerely, w Thomas R. Wrinkle Sierra West Surveying TRW/lgv 2 Bob Woodworth, Tentative Parcel Map,-AP 66-52-02, 4 parcels located on the north side of Ponderosa way, approx. 500 ft. east from its intersection with Nimshew Road. Nimshew area. Engineer: Sierra West Surveying Tom Wrinkle was present. He said that a revised Planning Director's Report was received. He said that access will be off Nimshew Ridge Road R Skyway cannot be used, or they would be happy to pay a mitigation fee like the one for the bridge if one is established. Mr. Edell said the bridge*mitigation fee was established by the Director of Public Works in 1979 or 1980 when there was a proposal for a major subdivision in the area with an impact on the narrow curve and a box culvert needing replacement. Mr. Wrinkle said they would be happy to pay into any kind of assessment district for Skyway traffic problems. Mr. Wrinkle said that the applicant was not told until the last minute that the traffic problem on Skyway was a problem. However, the project can use Nimshew Ridge Road, going out to Centerville Road and Skyway near Chico, improving ft as necessary. It might be necessary to acquire access through the private property along Nimshew Road. Mr. Edell suggested that the engineer provide a written proposal as to what the applicant intends to do so there is no misunderstanding. Mr. Sanders said that would be a good idea, and he would request a continuance in order to discuss the situation with the Director. Mr. Wrinkle said the choices are either to provide a traffic study or provide access in another direction. Velma Butler, 14073 Nimshew Rd., Magalia, asked what size of parcels are proposed. Mr. Edell said that 2 - 3 acre parcels and 2 -6 acre parcels are proposed. Ms. Butler said she did not understand how there could be access to Skyway without using Nimshew Road. Mr. Edell said the applicant is proposing to use Nimshew Rd. and then go south to Centerville Rd. Ms. Butler said the access is over a cliff to the south, or to the north ft would be a narrow gravel road all the way to Chico. It would be very costly to go south, since there is not a road there. Ponderosa is also a steep narrow mountain road. She asked if the intent is to split the parcels again. Mr. Edell said that a 4 parcel split is being considered. If the proposal is approved, ft would take another proposal to further divide any of the parcels. Mr. Sanders said that there is a 3 acre minimum in the zoning, and,therefore the potential to create 2 more lots. Ms. Butler said that Nimshew Road is paved but narrow with sharp turns and a small narrow bridge. Apparently the concern about Skyway traffic is related to Skyway going over the dam, not stoplights lower down on Skyway. Doris Wilson, 13846 Nimshew Road, said that there is an Indian burial ground that is on the property and ft should be preserved. Ms. Wilson said that there is a water problem in the area. The road is very narrow BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES AUGUST 30, 1993 and has a bottleneck 4etween two culverts. There are logging trucks on the road. The narrow bridge should be widened. This item was continued for 2 weeks to have the surveyor make a formal presentation regarding access along Nimshew Road,and also to review other issues that have been brought up in letters or at this hearing, including water, circulation and archaeological concerns. BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES AUGUST 30, 1993 ;at:�:.estsBlisitiaU�. d'aties��sd.'aNDerssi� -%torr- ��-.-. .:dsaistation ;� task force on the Upper Ridge. (fros 3/3/87) _ . ..=''•__". (816) NOTION: TO WTIBLTSH THE TRANSPORTATION TASK FORCE ON THE QPPER RIDGE AND THE CHARGE TO THE TASK FORCE IS TO BE TO STUDY THE PROBLEMS OF TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION IN TIE UPPER RIDGE AREA AND ADVISE THE BOARD ON POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS, WITH THE TASK FORCE TO BE COMPRISED OF THE FOLLOWING ` INDIVIDUALS: COUNCIT-NAN SHANE SHANE, PAmin PUi1LIC WORKS DIRECTOR JON LANDERS, PARADISE MLICi CHIEF LEO TLamm, PARMISE PLANNING DIRECTOR Ab , BWM COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR BILL CNW, PARADISE PINES RESIDENT MATT NATTSON (WHO TM SAVE AN kLTERNATZ), AND TOADTOWN RESIDENT DAVID JkCK80N. S M VOTE: 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 Y 5 Y (Unanimously carried) CLOSED SX8SION: The Board recessed at 11:32 a.m. to hold a closed session on the following litigation hatters: Naples v. County of Butte, Handy v. County of Butte, Wright v. County of Butte, Estrada v. County of Butte, Commonwealth v. County of Butte, Thomas v. County of Butte, North Valley Nall, southeast bond lawsuit and Downtown lawsuit. RECONVENE: The Board reconvened at 1:30 p.m. following a closed session on the above. (NO ANNOUNCEMENTS MADE AT THIS TIME.) (SUPERVISOR FULTON ABSENT AT THIS TINE.) 87-145 Presentation by Bob Hennigan, Rock Creek Reclamation District -regarding drainage/flooding concerns in Rock, Pine and Mud Creek ' drainage areas.. " (Supervisor Dolan) (968) ***(000) (REFBtRED TO CHICO ISSUES COMMITTEE. REFERRED TO COUNTY COUNSZL AND PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD ON THB LEGALITIES ON STOPPING • DBVELOPKENT IN COUNTY SERVICE AREA 87.) (SUPERVISOR MCLAUGHLIN ABSENT AT THIS TIME.) Page 198 March 17, .1987 1 � �'Art.O Off• s�//�N7tvrrsrtl ht.vvrG'C ' UX_ U►LL c W,/HaY S .nPcD�i��.Sgys : A s a afof=re bn 'e�to t al'=mdrfiirst:= m F 0 WPoa�T. 0( Pouf. Inter-Departmental Memorandum "LETS t, l-V a(Al�d 6000 CX-T O.F. Go-A .g�p TO: Butte County Development Review Committee ...-. FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT: Revised Report for Bob Woodworth, Tentative Parcel Map on AP #066-520-002 DATE: August 2, 1993 This is a proposal to divide 18 acres to create 4 parcels; 2 at 6 acres and 2 at 3 acres. The present zoning is ARM11-3. The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural -Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The. proposal does not conflict with County Zoning, however, it does conflict with an adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General Plan and Specific or Community Plan. As mentioned in the initial study, this project will contribute to the cumulative traffic impacts of the Greater Paradise Ridge Area. The proposed project does not conform to the policies of the Land Use and Circulation Elements of the County's General Plan:The policy states that "adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service the area" must be present to allow development. This project would contribute to an existing traffic problem on the Skyway, when coupled with other development already approved on the upper ridge area, traffic would be further impacted. The Skyway facility must be improved and capacity increased to accomodate further subdivisions according to the Joint Advisory Committee appointed by the Butte County Board of Supervisors. The Circulation Element of the County's General Plan contains goals, objectives and policies that require solutions to the traffic impacts on Skyway before additional development can take place. In the absence of specific action or direction by the Board of Supervisors to implement recommendations of the Joint Advisory Committee, or the policies of the Circulation Element, the project cannot be made to conform to the General Plan, Circulation Element or Land Use Element. The Butte County Association of Governments is currently undertaking a Transportation Computer Model Study to develop transportation policies and solutions for the greater ° I Paradise ridge area. Until such study is completed, it is unlikely any transportation policy \'will be developed in the interim to proceed with additional development. The applicant has the option of developing a solution to the traffic problems by conducting; a focused Environmental Impact Report (EIR), however, _ -: gt o`n , -i%reR_t_-T aplie=applicant offers to a trans ortationact.fees...if ahe.Co�n ..-had=an P .Y P g P -orduiancer.in. lace�to collect�suc i fees._at..the:.time:bu�lain permits are.pulled:foz he:;lots lcrtedLb.�=this='Tenative�Paee a . Such a proposal does not address the cumulative Y impacts, nor .the regional transportation impacts. Such a mitigation measure does not establish when, or what kind of transportation improvements are needed to service the transportation demands of the greater Ridge area. Nor does such a proposal evaluate the costs of transportation improvements and possible finance options. The California Government Code Article 5 Section 65950 allows sixmonths to take.action on a project not requiring an EIR. Because the applicant has not accepted preparing a focused EIR, nor proposed mitigation measures which could effectively mitigate the cumulative traffic impacts, the Environmental Documents must be deemed incomplete and the project denied. Under Section 65950 of the Government Code, a decision must be-made no later than November 14, 1993, unless the project proponent requests an extension of the time limit . outlined by both Public Resources Code Section 21080.2 and Government-Code Section 65950 and such a request is received and approved. RECOMMENDATION: A. Find that the environmental documents for the project have not been completed and that the project does not conform to the policies of the General Plan. B. Deny the Tentative Parcel Map for Bob Woodworth, AP #066-520-002, pursuant to Section 65950 of the California Government Code and 'Section 21080.1 of the California Public Resources Code. LPW:Ipw - cc: Environmental Health Dept.. Bob Woodworth Sierra West Surveying A D 1St A_E� S �-T t-T1o ISE 1_ -r Due to the sparse population of the Paradise area, Professional Solutions perceived that the total s operating speed.measure would give a better indication of congestion on the roadway network during peak periods. By using this approach, yg-1 Fie ! { ations-were_:found to=be.:deficien Editors Note: The following results.are successive. That is, segments that are deficient in earlier scenarios are also deficient in the following years. The results were not repeated for reader convenience. x :989Base YeaVolumes So`° hounc=�S vl�auy=a� o� h� 0'Cla1atersect'ioa Southbound Skyway and Westbound Pearson Road approaches to the Skyway/Pearson Road Intersection Foster Road approach to Skyway Intersection 1995 Forecast Volumes Skyway under the Magnolia Reservoir Dam Northbound Skyway and Northbound Clark Road approaches to the Skyway/Clark Road Intersection Bille Road approach to Clark Road Intersection The following approaches to Skyway in the City Center: Westbound Elliott Road Westbound Black Olive Road _ Northbound Fir Street Old Skyway and Pentz Road approaches to Skyway Intersection T L 2010 Forecast Volumes Remaining Intersections at the Skyway/Elliott Road Intersection Central Park Drive approach to Clark Road Intersection All approaches to Skyway in the Paradise Pines Area The latter approach bases its deficiency report on current procedures in the Highway Capacity Manual. This process bases deficiency in terms of delay; rather than volume-to-capacity. In some cases it is possible to have a high v/c ratio, but traffic is functioning fairly efficiently without too much delay. In other cases, the v/c may. be non-representative of delay that is being experienced on the network. Therefore, Professional Solutions utilized the operating speed technique to offer another view to determining deficient locations in the Paradise area. It should be noted that both methods are a planning x., tool and are meant to supplement professional judgement in good transportation planning for the Paradise area. Paradise Transportation Planning.Model Page 41 Page 1 of 1 • Michelena, Mark From: John Hanley Ohanley@northstareng.com) Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 11:05 AM To: Michelena, Mark Subject: TPM 05-25 Mark, Your letter dated 6-22-05 regarding application completeness for TPM 05-25 (AP 064-010-030)refers to the issue of fire safety. This issue will require some type of mitigation on our part. We would like to schedule a meeting to discuss this issue and the Nimshew Road access concerns. Thursday 8/4, Monday 8/8, Thursday 8/11 or Friday 8/12 works for us. We're pretty flexible when it comes to the time of day. Jim Herrick would like to have someone from Land Development present and anyone else you feel should attend this meeting. I hope one of these dates Works into your schedule. Thanks. 8/8/2005 BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 2770 Olive Highway, Suite C o Oroville, California 95966-6117 (530)538-7784 o Fax (530)538-2847 o www.buttelafco.org D MEMORANDUM BUTTE E L P COUNTY TO: Mark Michelena, Butte County Planning Division .JUN 2 12005 DEVELOPMENT FROM: Stephen Lucas, Principal Planner SERVICES SUBJECT: TPM 05-25- Roger Nichols DATE: June 17, 2005 - NOTE: 1. PLEASE DIRECT TO LAFCO A COPY OF THE ADVISORY AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE AND STAFF REPORT FOR THIS PROJECT WHEN COMPLETED. 2. PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15073, PLEASE PROVIDE TO LAFCO AS AN ANTICIPATED RESPONSIBLE AGENCY,THE NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH A COPY OF THE PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND INITIAL STUDY ATTACHED. The affected parcels are located within the boundaries of the following local agencies: 1. Butte County Mosquito and Vector Control District 2. Paradise Recreation and Park District 3. Paradise Unified School District 4. Kimshew Cemetery District 5. Butte Community College District 6. CSA No. 164 (Animal Control) 7. CSA No. 4 (Sierra Del Oro Lighting and Drainage) 8. Butte County Resource Conservation District 1. The project area is located in the Town of Paradise Sphere of Influence. Consultation with the Town is encouraged to promote coordinated planning within the Sphere and ensure development is consistent with Town standards. LAFCO policies discourage urban development without annexation to a city. 2. The parcel is located within CSA No. 4 (Sierra Del Oro Lighting and Drainage) which provides street lighting, storm drainage maintenance and water quality testing for area residents. The Department of Public Works has additionally inquired about adding fire protection services to this CSA due to the high fire hazard designation for this area, it is recommend that both DPW and BCF/CDF Captain Read be consulted. Will CSA 4 be impacted by the proposed project? Are the resulting parcels to remain in the CSA? If so, the existing parcel charge should be extended to the resulting parcels. It is recommended that the disposition of the CSA be examined carefully when considering this proposal. 3. Continued divisions of unincorporated parcels for large lot residential development within, or adjacent to,the City's Sphere of Influence does not facilitate the creation of a compact urban form, maximize scarce available lands or result in the efficient provision of urban type services. These are fundamental issues to LAFCO pursuant to Government Code Section 56000 and will be of consequence if any LAFCO action should be required. If you have any questions concerning these comments, please contact our office at your convenience. i 3 � . . .. "s-' 1'?i�•ti r t 's�'":? ?t?}'.�<~'F is''! k •__. 3 .r r � r� i r .t... .« .! ,'Jt i° "k i;t� , t' r ? dis r'M�,..7;4%'4 ... !`y' . e r 1 '..�:�' °'�i . . �. a. ' g• r .'' .�� '�' a. st;l' i'•w.''tr,t ri ` f ^d'�r ! '�' t `.1 r 't�:,, . . „��:;.,]•' .'�•' • '". _ 1 .. :r t-. • . 'z+ s.• '7•._.. � ..' �. '. ..r .'�I 1. .. i, � tf .1 . '•r 1 .., ' r ,.;c: ,.✓ +-•r- ail a•. .. R � n.•t .. ., .ir' ,. � , .. _ ..`i' C). L?� i t,,:1 .+•` -. 1-r' . .���+ ' _ Z.✓ i�>7�•is . ..� .a. ::i�'t.i'!, ' .G�. •: .r .� .' ". BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: Rodger Nichols DATE RECEIVED: 5/24/2005 AGENT: Northstar Engineering APN: 064-010-030 PLANNER: Mark Michelena FILE#TPM 05-25 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To divide a 40+/- acre property into four 10 acre properties Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS: S. FIRE CLEARANCE X 1. Place amote on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the parcel map or on an additional map sheet stating that "Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the time of permit issuance and maintained continuously thereafter." ❑ 2. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the parcel map or on an additional map sheet stating that "Prior to Fire Department Hydrant Final, fire hydrant identification, road reflector or post reflectors shall be installed acceptable to the County Fire Chief." ❑ 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, pay $200.00 per created parcel into the Battalion water tender fund unless a pressurized water system is installed to serve the parcels. ❑ 4. Prior to construction, a pressurized community water system for fire protection is required. Bonding could be allowed with the approval of the Fire Chief. Average required hydrant spacing is feet, hydrant size inches, and residual fire flow gpm. Prior to final map recordation, submit plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. X 5. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the parcel map or on an additional map sheet stating that "Fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurized community water system, with hydrants that meet Fire Department specifications, serves the parcels." Additionally, this note is to be added to all building plans. ❑ 6. Prior to recordation of the final map, payment may be made into the hydrant fund, in lieu of hydrant installation, at a cost of$1.72 per lineal foot of street frontage. The estimated fee amount is $ ❑ 7. Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall pay the then current established fee for the West Chico Fire Station Fund. ❑ 8. Prior to final building inspection, provide an all weather access of at least 10 feet wide and with a vertical clearance of 15 feet that will allow for ingress and egress and accommodate 40,000 pound fire apparatus to all structures. ❑ 9. Provide plans and specifications to the Butte County Fire Marshall to determine compliance with Fire Life Safety Standards of Titles 19 and 24, California Code of Regulations. X Construction, installation or development of buildings and/or roads, driveways, gates and bridges on parcels/lots shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe Regulations—Public Resources Code 4290, 4291 and current Butte County Improvement Standards, whichever is stricter. Butte County Fire Department Standard Conditions,Revised 10/13/04.rt Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Memorandum June 9, 2005 To: Inter-Departmental Review Committee Subject: Rodger Nichols, TPM 05-25 Planner: Mark Michelena APN: 064-010-030 Location on the south side of Tika Lane, approximately 0.4 miles south of Nimshew Road, Magalia. 30-Day Complete: 06/24/2005 Date of IDR: 06/15/2005 Please respond by June 14, 2005, regarding completeness of application. Do you find this application complete? ❑ No. What is needed to make the application complete? X IYes. Conditions and/or mitigation measures (please respond by 06/30/05). Standard Conditions are attached .for vour convenience. Signature: Darren Read Date: 06/15/2005 (Please send your response to mmichelena@buttecounty.net.) This application is being provided to you for comments. Please see attached documents. A hard copy of the application, including maps,has been sent to Environmental Health, LAFCo,County Counsel, the Assessor's office,the Public Works Director, the Agricultural Commissioner, CDF, and the Building Manager. All Environmental Health correspondence is touted through Mary Johnston at 7 County Center Drive. The purpose of this notice is to give you the opportunity to comment on the completeness of this application electronically to the planner, so that preparations can be made for the IDR meeting on June 14,2005. i Butte County Department of Development Services PLANNING DIVISION %3T lF 7 County Center Drive o _ /� ° Oroville CA 95965 ° ° (530)538-7601 Telephone °c�U N'�y° (530)538-7785 Facsimile Date June 6, 2005 TO: FROM: Mark Michelena, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: RodgerNicholsTentative Parcel MapTPM 05-25 APN: 064-010-030 DATE OF Inter-Departmental Review: 6/15/2005 IDR RESPONSE REGARDING COMPLETENESS OF APPLICATION DUE BY: June 13, 2005 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT CONDITIONSIMITIGATION MEASURES DUE BY: June 30, 2005 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, to be determined at the Inter-Departmental Review (IDR) Committee meeting on 6/15/2005, and/or to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To divide a 40+/- acre property into four 10 acre properties. PROJECT LOCATION: on the south side of Tika Lane, approximately 0.4 miles south of Nimshew Road, Magalia.. COUNTY SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO.: 5 ZONING: AR-2-1/2((Agricultural-Residential, 2-1/2-acre parcels)) GENERAL PLAN: AR(Agricultural Residential) If a response cannot be submitted prior to the due dates listed above, please call Mark Michelena at (530) 538-(530) 873-3542 or send him an email at Mmichelena@buttecounty.net. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. IDR COMMITTEE —APPLICATION COMPLETE: No (Please send response to Mark Michelenaby June 13, 2005) X Yes (Conditions/mitigation measures due by June 30, 2005) Document r" , � • Page 1 of 1 Michelena, Mark From: Read, Darren [Darren.Read@fire.ca.gov] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:48 AM To: Michelena, Mark Subject: FW: Nichols TPM 05-25 APN 064-010-030 Mark, I just now got this emailed to me. Darren Read Fire Captain, Fire Protection Planning Law Enforcement& Fire Prevention Bureau CDF Fire, Butte County Fire Rescue City of Biggs and Gridley Fire Departments 176 Nelson Ave. Oroville'CA 95965 (530) 538-7888 Work (530) 538-2105 Fax (530) 521-8072 Cell -----Original Message----- From: Benedict, Gwyn [mailto:GBenedict@buttecounty.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:40 AM To: Read, Darren Subject: FW: Nichols TPM 05-25 APN 064-010-030 And here is the email for Nichols. Thanks Please review the attached documents. They are being provided to you for your comments. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Gwyn Benedict Office Specialist, Senior Development Services 7 County Center Dr, Oroville (530) 538-5260 Fax: (530) 538-2140 6/15/2005 Michelena, Mark From: Wannenmacher, Felix Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 4:44 PM To: Michelena, Mark; Christopher, Yvonne; 'Stephen A. Streeter' Cc: Miller, Gloria Subject: Nichols Application (TPM 05-25)A#05-389 Hi Mark, Yvonne, and Stephen, The zone is not listed as consistent with the GP. Make separate consistency findings as to each. Felix CONFIDENTIAL --ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email transmission, and any documents or messages attached to it, may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering this email to the intended recipient, then you are (1) notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, saving, reading or use of this information is strictly prohibited, (2) requested to discard and delete this email and any attachments, and (3) requested to immediately notify us by email that you mistakenly received this message. Thank you. 1 Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Memorandum June 9, 2005 To: Inter-Departmental Review Committee Subject: Rodger Nichols, TPM 05-25 Planner: Mark Michelena APN: 064-010-030 Location on the south side of Tika Lane, approximately 0.4 miles south of Nimshew Road, Magalia. 30-Day Complete: 06/24/2005 Date of IDR: 06/15/2005 Please respond by June 14, 2005, regarding completeness of application. Do you find this application complete? ❑ I No. What is needed to make the application complete? X I Yes. Conditions and/or mitigation measures No apparent adverse agricultural issues, no other conditions or mitigating measures. Signature: Robert C . Hill , Deputy Ag . Commissioner Date: June 10 2005 (Please send your response to mmichelena@buttecounty.net.) This application is being provided to you for comments. Please see attached documents. A hard copy of the application, including maps,has been sent to Environmental Health, LAFCo, County Counsel, the Assessor's office,the Public Works Director, the Agricultural Commissioner, CDF, and the Building Manager. All Environmental Health correspondence is routed through Mary Johnston at 7 County Center Drive. The purpose of this notice is to give you the opportunity to comment on the completeness of this application electronically to the planner, so that preparations can be made for the IDR meeting on June 14, 2005. A t Page 1 of 2 Michelena, Mark From: Weitze, Cathy Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 12:07 PM To: Michelena, Mark Subject: RE: Lot Split on APN 064-010-030 Mark, Thank you for clearing that up for me. have no further comments on the Parcel Map then. I'll just wait for the new map page and parcel numbers from our mapping department in the future. Cathy -----Original Message----- From: Michelena, Mark Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 11:32 AM To: Weitze, Cathy Subject: RE: Lot Split on APN 064-010-030 Hello Cathy, The submitted TPM 05-25 for Nichols on APN 064-010-029 is located partly in the Deer Herd Development Permited (Parcels sizes determined by General Plan, zoning and septic requirements) and not on deer herd area. So there will be no direct issue with deer herd on this parcel map. I will have more information on potential issues for the project after the Internal Department Review (IDR) meeting on 6/15/05. Mark Miehelena, Associate Planner Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division 7 County Center Drive,Oroville,CA 95965 530-538-7376,FAX:530-538-7785 From: Weitze, Cathy Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 10:40 AM To: Michelena, Mark Subject: Lot Split on APN 064-010-030 Hi Mark, I just received the request for comments on the lot split to be done on the above referenced parcel. I was recently doing an appraisal on the parcel just north of this one, (APN 064-010-029)and noticed that it was in a Deer Herd area. The map I found on the Development Services website indicates that there is a 20 acre minimum but that development is permitted. How does that affect this tentative parcel map of four-10 acre parcels?Are there exceptions to the rules? Cathy Weitze Real Property Appraiser Butte County Assessor's Office 6/10/2005 Page 2 of 2 (530)872-6451 6/10/2005 MEMORANDUM BUTTE COUNTY JUN 10 2005 DEVELOPMEN, TO: Mark Michelena, Associate Planner SERVICRe Butte County Dept. of Development Services FROM: Al McGreehan, Community Development Director �''� SUBJECT: Town of Paradise Review & Comment: Roger Nichols Tentative Parcel Map [TPM 05-25] Application; AP No. 064-010-030 DATE: June 9, 2005 Thank you for the opportunity afforded to review and provide comment regarding the above- noted proposed development project. On behalf of the Town of Paradise, town staff offers the following comments and observations: 1. If and when this application is deemed "complete" for processing by Butte County staff, then town staff requests receipt of any subsequent environmental document and staff report that is generated for said application prior to it being scheduled for public hearing. 2. In reference to the town adopted Paradise General Plan, the subject project property is located within the "secondary study area" and is assigned a "AR" [Agricultural Residential] land use designation. This designation applies to existing and planned residential areas characterized by larger parcels and accessory agricultural uses, including raising of livestock and other forms of agricultural production. It provides for single-family detached homes, limited agricultural uses, churches and public uses. Residential densities shall be in the range of one or less dwelling unit per gross acre. 3. Based upon the information provided with this application town staff cannot discern whether this project property is afforded potential "year-round" access via two different directions within a "through linkage maintained roadway circulation system" or solely by a single direction within a overly complex cul-de-sac roadway system serving the "Upper Paradise Ridge Area". 4. This project application is subject to a "discretionary" decision-making action by the Butte County decision making body. Given the ongoing and cumulative adverse traffic impacts that this type of land use development places upon the Town of Paradise and the Paradise Ridge area, it is important that Butte County carefully exercise its discretionary decision-making authority. 5. Lastly, on behalf of the Town of Paradise, town staff again recommends that Butte County refrain from rendering discretionary "approval" decisions concerning additional residential development projects within the "Upper Paradise Ridge Area" unless and until adequate Butte County adopted growth management policies and mechanisms for improving traffic circulation in the area are properly and formally in place. cc: Chuck Rough, Town Manager Paradise Planning Commission Town Council Members t c Z2-4�6 County of Butte1 ' AW Oroville,California vw apy GENERAL CLAIM CLAIMANT: Roger Nichols =C\ /ate 43:2 ADDRESS: PO Box 512 CITY&STATE: Paradise, CA 95967 DATE OF CLAIM: June 21,2006 SUMBIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES DATE RECM DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM(DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY) AMOUNT REFUND CLAIM-ATR#84995,Receipt#430710,Check#5313:Application withdrawn by applicant. Application #TPM 05-25 PAID RETAINED REFUND Development Services $ 3,198.00 $ 193.24 $ 3,004.76 Land Development $ - $ - $ - Environmental Health $ - $ - $ - CDF/Fire $ - $ - $ - Agricultural Department $ - $ - $ - NOD/NOE Clerk's Filing Fee $ 36.00 $ - $ 36.00 TOTAL $ 3,234.00 $ 193.24 $ 3,040.76 . ................................................ .............. ............. ............... .ktAKDO.Y. BUDGET: ACCOUNT' :ANTOUFdT ................................................... .............. ............. .............. Development Services 440001 4210900 $ 3,004.76 Land Development 440004 4611700 $ - Environmental Health 540003 4614901 $ - CDF/Fire 0100 4617240 $ - Agricultural Department 460001 4312100 $ - NOD/NOE 470001 4612319 $ 36.00 TOTAL 1 $ 3,040.76 $ 3,040.76 I,the undersigned,declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered,and that this claim is true and correct as stated. Dated this day of ,2006,at Calif. Signature of Claimant I,the undersigned,hereby certify that,to the best of my knowledge,the services or articles specified above have been performed or delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriation or Specific Board Approval (Check one)for the same. Dated this day of 2006,at Oroville Calif. Department Head or Authorized Deputy Dept. SEE Exp. Code BREAKDOWN Code PAYABLE FROM FUND DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-AUDITOR'S USE ONLY DEPT&SUB. PROJ SUB.OBJ CLAIM NO. INV NO. INV.DATE ENCUMB. GROSS AMT. Claimant-Submitted for your approval/signature. Please return signed form to: Development Services Department Accounts Receivable 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 r r ,t Butte County Depa.&ent ofDevelopment SerSes Q T rF 7 County Center Drive o 0 00 Oroville,CA 95965 ° o (530)538-7601 Telephone o (530)538-7785 Facsimile USI 3 0 200 ADMINISTRATION* BUILDING* PLANNING Date of Inquiry: March 10, 2006 REFUND INQUIRY for: Name: Roger Nichols APN # 064-010-030 Type of Permit, TPM 05-25 ATR # 84995 , Dated: 5/25/05 Reason: Discreti,on ary.ref und, applicant has withdrawn the application. Please indicate the amount of refund, if any,for the above-referenced applicant. Your reply to this e-mail will authorize the refund for your department. (If none, please indicate 0 in your reply.) Thank you. Department Amount Submitted Authorized Refund Land Development $491.00 $ Environmental Health $1041.50 $ CDF/Fire - $263.00 $ Agriculture $32.50 $ Please reply by ;March 24 2006 Authorized by: Title: 0"(/ , 9/yC f7i✓ Department:�/Vy�G.c W�'✓�f Date: Oc 3,O/Zi" G Please return to Gwyn Benedict at Development Services Administration Division. You can email your authorized refund amount if you prefer to gbenedict@buttecounty.net. Thank you. Butte County p De amen D • OTl t ofDevelopment Services � F 7 County Center Drive o 0 0 0 Oroville,CA 95965 0 0 (530)538-7601 Telephone o = .__- 0 (530)538-7785 Facsimile o —_ = o ADMINISTRATION*BUILDING*PLANNING Date of Inquiry: March 10, 2006 REFUND INQUIRY for: Name: Roger Nichols APN # 064-010_-030 Tf P ype oermit, # TPM 05-25 ATR# 84995 , Dated: 5/25/05 Reason: Discretionary_refund, applicant has withdrawn the application. Please indicate the amount of refund, if any, for the above-referenced applicant. Your reply to this e-mail will authorize the refund for your department. (If none, please indicate 0 in your reply.) Thank you. Department Amount Submitted Authorized Refund Land Development $491.00 $ Environmental Health $1041.50 $ CDF/Fire $263.00 $ Agriculture $32.50 $ 0 Please reply by 'March 24, 2006 Authorized by: Title: Department: Date: Please return to Gwyn Benedict at Development Services Administration Division. You can email your authorized refund amount if you prefer to gbenedict@buttecounty.net. Thank you. r4 COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S'CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROVILLE, CA `ATR NO ' 9.4995 RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BAG#316 DATE 5125/2003 FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH b DESCRIPTION Tint , CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: 5P?.5RECEIPTS:. 430654-4110 PLANNING APPL FEES GENL 0010 40001 42109M 101aU1. 7,235:00 ✓ Project Number Amount of Fee APN 028-23H09; BANGOR ROCK QUARRY.-MI 04N-05 $839 APN 0311-160-017;GEORGIA NELSON;TPM 05-24 $3,198 APN 064610-030;RODGER NICHOLS;TPM,05-25 `$3,198 _ LAND DEVELOPMENT GENL'' 0010 4400t}4 4611700 161001 982.00 Project Number Amount offee APN 030-160-017; GEORGIA NELSON;TPM 05-24 $491 APN.064-010-030.'RODGER NICHOLS;TPM.05-25'. $491 ENVIRONMENTAL HLTH GENL 0010 54000:1 4614901.., 101001 3,417.50 Project Number Amount of Fee APN 030-160-017;GEORGIA NELSON;TPM 05-24 $376 '"'APN 084-010=030;RODGER NICHOLS;TPM 06-25 $1,041.50 FIRE PLNG APPL'FEE FIRE PROTECT,0100 4617240 101001 526.00 Project Number Amountof Fee APN 030-160-017;GEORGIA NELSON;TPM 0.5-24 $283 APN 064090-030;RODGER NICHOLS;TPM 05-25 $263 NODINOE CLERK'S FILING FE GENL 0010 470001 .4612319 101001 72.00 ($36) Project Number Amount of'Fee APN 030-16M17: GEORGIA NELSON:TPM 05-24 $36 APN 064-010-030;RODGER NICHOLS:TPM 05-25 $36 AGRICULTURE AG FEE 0010 460001 4612100 101001 65.00 Project Number, Amount of Fee - APN 030-160-017;GEORGIA NELSON;TPM 05-24 $32.50 APN 064010-030;RODGER NICHOLS;TPM 06-25 $32.50 D.O.T.-ALUC PLANNING GENL 0010 440001 4617241 101001 1,5.1.00 Project Number Amount of Fee: APN 015-230-02&BONNIE LAMB=A 05-28 $1,531 DOCUMENTICOPY SALES GENL 0010 440001 4711910 101001 2.00 TOTAL,$ 119.30.50 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TREASURER C/ white—treasurer Pink=auditor canary--depositor golden r d=file C5 Tuesday,June 20,2006 Development Services PLANNING DIVISION ver. 1.0 Counter DDS Planning $3,198.00 Person ;Chris ! (General Fund) Payment Date .05/24/2005 Public Works $491.00^ (Land Development) Receipt Number 430710 Environmental Health $1,041.50 Received From Nichols, Rodger CDF(Fire Department) $263.00 : • Applicant Same NOD/NOE $36.00 (Recording Fee) Aunt Minnie $0.00 ~= Application Number ,TPM 05-25 $1, 500 or$2,000 or In Reference To _ Planning Review/EIR $0.00 Parcel Number ;064-010-030 i ------ Fish/Game $0.00 Check Number/Cash 15313 ALUC $0.00 --- --- (Airport Land Use) Total Received $5,062.00 . Non Sufficient. $0.00 Funds ($25.00 Fee) Total Fees $5,062.00 Cell Tower $0.00 • 1($2500.00) Public Sales/Copies $0.00 Ag Fee: $32.50 I ; f . 2� ('00 CL- { 1 r n tarS� 1 1 I DEPOSIT SHEET DATE 05/25/2005 PLANNING DIVISION BAG NUMBER: 1316 DDS PUBLIC WORKS ENVIRONMTL FIRE PLNG NOD/NOE AGRICULTURE AUNT MINNIE PLANNING FISH&GAME DOT-ALUC NSF Land Dev DOCUMENT RECEIPT (PLANNING) (LAND DEV) HEALTH APPL.FEE CLERK'S FEE DEPOSITS REVIEW (RECORDER) (RETURNED Cell Tower Dep COPY SALES NUMBER (Application Fees) $36 FILING FEE F-0010 $1500/$2000 EIR-DEPOSIT '$850/$1250 CHECK FEE) DEPOSIT F-0010 F-0010 F-0010 FUND-0100 F-0010 460001 F-1001 F-1001 F-1001 F-0010 F-0010 F-1001 F-0010 RC 4210900 RC 4611700 RC 4614901 RC 4617240 RC 4612319 4612100 101 1305 101 1110 101 1460 RC 4617241 RC 4610105 101 1307 RC 4711910 430654 1,531.00 430701 $ 376.00 430705 2.00 430706 839.00 430709 $ 3,198.00 $ 491.00 T 263.00 T 36.00 32.50 430710 3,198.00 491.00 1,041.50 263.00 36.00 32.50 DISCRECTIONARY REFUND GRAND TOTAL TO BE DEPOSITED $ 11,830.50 • By: PREPARED BY: Diane Lewellen, Ext.6869 Revised 11/1/02 • 06/20/2006 Butte County Department of Development Services 10:48 AM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 1 Nickname TPM 05-251 Nichols Full Name Rodger Nichols Address P.O. Box 512 Paradise CA 95967 Business (530)873-3542 Fax Home Other In Ref To 064-010-030 Notes 064-010-030 Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt Activity: none 05/27/2005 Gwyn 35.00 0.19 6.69 No Charge 8803 Initial Processing -Clerical 0.19 6.69 Input, initial clerical processing of application. 06/06/2005 Lynn 45.00 0.84 37.74 No Charge 8887 Initial Processing -Clerical 0.84 37.74 Input, initial clerical processing of application. 06/15/2005 Mark 59.00 0.42 24.58 No.Charge 8993 Meeting - Planner 0.42 24.58 IDR-Completeness Review 06/20/2005 Mark 59.00 0.59 34.74 No Charge 9047'Correspondence- Planner 0.59 34.74 Incomplete Letter 06/22/2005 Mark 59.00 0.58 34.42 No Charge 9079 Correspondence- Planner 0.58 34.42 Letters generated by planner regarding the project or application. Incomplete letter/fax 08/12/2005 Mark 59.00 0.93 55.07 No Charge 9565 Meeting- Planner 0.93 55.07 Time spent in meetings (Not incl. Public Hearings). Total: none 0.00 $0.00 No Charge 3.55 $193.24 Do Not Bill 3.55 $193.24 TOTAL Billable Fees 0.00 $0.00 No Charge 3.55 $193.24 Totalof billable expense slips $0.00 Amount Total Total of Fees (Time Charges) $0.00 • 0 06/20/2006 Butte County Department of Development Services 10:48 AM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 2 TPM 05-25:Rodger Nichols (continued) • Amount Total Total of Costs (Expense Charges) $0.00 Total new charges $0.00 Accounts Receivables DateJID Type Description 05/24/2005 INV Invoice- Flat Fee Project $3,198.00 1885 05/24/2005-PAY Payment - Receipt #430710 ($3,198.00) 1886 Total Accounts Receivable $0.00 Total New Balance $0.00 Employee Summary Employee Rate Hours Charges Slip Value Adjustment MM 0.00 2.52 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 LR 0.00 0.84 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 GLB 0.00 0.19 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 Owl �3.a r County of Butte Oroville,California GENERAL CLAIM f� CLAIMANT: Roger Nichols ADDRESS: PO BOX 512 /�� 1o6 CITY&STATE: Paradise, CA 95967 DATE OF CLAIM: June 21,2006 SUMBIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEMNG GOODS OR SERVICES DATE REVC DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM(DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY) AMOUNT REFUND CLAIM-ATR#84995,Receipt#430710,Check#5313:Application withdrawn by a licant. 06y •-010-030 Application#TPM 0-5-_2_57_1 PAID RETAINED REFUND Development Services $3,19-8.0-0- $ 193.24 $ 31004.76 Land Development $ - $ - $ - Environmental Health $ - $ - $ - CDF/Fire $ - $ - $ Agricultural Department $ $ - $ - NOD/NOE Clerk's Filing Fee $ 36.00 $ - $ 36.00 TOTAL $3,234.00 $ 193.24 $ 3,040.76 � tBREAKDOWN� `r� BUDGET.1 �AM fACCOIINTOUNT` Development Services 440001 4210900 $ 3,004.76 x Land Development 440004 4611700 $ - Environmental Health 540003 4614901 $ - CDF/Fire 0100 4617240 $ - �y Agricultural Department 460001 4312100 $ - ra NOD/NOE 470001 4612319 $ 36.00 TOTAL $ 3,040.76 $ 3,040.76 I,the undersigned,declare under penally of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered,and that this claim is true and correct as stated. ,/�� Dated this d day of uN c 2006,at f1A QA 1ZA ,Calif. (20 2 ?A N fie-HO Signature–oft man I,the undersigned,hereby certify that,to the best of my knowledge,the services or articlesspeclfiad abov been performed or delivered and that there is a Budget.Appropriation or Specific Board Approval (Check one)for the e. Dated this ) day of ,2006,at Oroville Calif. Department Head or Authorized Depuly Dept. SEE Exp. Code _�REAKDOWN Code PAYABLE FROM FUND DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-AUDITOR'S USE ONLY DEPT&SUB. PROJ SUB.OBJ CLAIM NO. INV NO. INV.DATE ENCUMB. GROSS AMT. Claimant-Submitted for your approvallsignature. Please return signed form to: Development Services Department Accounts Receivable 7 County Center Drive Butte Count De anent ofDevelo ment Servs y P P . F 7 County Center Drive o.° o•` Oroville,CA 95965 530 538-7601 Telephone sem_ (530)538-7785 Facsimile ,cO �y ADMINISTRATION*BUILDING* PLANNING UN Date of Inquiry: March 10, 2006 REFUND INQUIRY for: Name: Roger Nichols A_P ;# 064-010-030 Type:of`Permit, TPM 05-25 ATR # 84995 , Dated: 5/25/05 Reason: Dscr'eto' aryre'fuan`d, applicant has withdrawn the application. Please indicate the amount of refund, if any,for the above-referenced applicant. Your reply to this e-mail will authorize the refund for your department. (If none, please indicate 0 in your reply.) Thank you. Department Amount Submitted Authorized Refund Land Development $491.00 $ 2- 5l Environmental Health $1041.50 $ CDF/Fire $263.00 $ Agriculture $32.50 $ Please reply by '.March 24, 2006 gip/ Authorized by:_ ` �'T Title: O"V& Or/'�� Department: we/G.c Wd✓�S Date: O� 30 Zov� Please return to Gwyn Benedict at Development Services Administration Division. You can email your authorized refund amount if you prefer to gbenedict@buttecounty.net. Thank you. Page 1 of 1 Edell, Stuart From: Benedict, Gwyn Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:19 PM To: Edell, Stuart Cc: Parker, Kathy Subject: RE: Refund authorization for Nichols TPM 05-25; apn 064-010-030 The applicant paid our department $3198.00, we have spent approx $193.24 of planner time and will be refunding the applicant $3004.26 plus the $36.00 recording fee we collected. From: Edell, Stuart Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:17 PM To: Parker, Kathy; Benedict, Gwyn Subject: RE: Refund authorization for Nichols TPM 05-25; apn 064-010-030 HOW MUCH IS Development Services going to refund? From: Parker, Kathy Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:29 PM To: Edell, Stuart Subject: FW: Refund authorization for Nichols TPM 05-25; apn 064-010-030 Stu, Once you fill out the form, please email me a copy so I can put it in our cash folder. Thanx. KP From: Benedict, Gwyn Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:25 PM To: Hinkle, Marge; Parker, Kathy; Damron, Charmaigne; Wilson, Cyndi Subject: Refund authorization for Nichols TPM 05-25; apn 064-010-030 Please review the attached refund authorization request form. We are issuing a Discretionary Refund due to the incompleteness of the original application. Please send your response within 10 days. Thank you for your time and attention in this matter, Sincerely, Gw.y._n Benedict Office Specialist, Senior Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Orovi I le CA 95965 (530) 538-7604 6/29/2006 0 • �urrF Butte County Department of Development Services o _ o Building Division - 7 County Center Drive .s _,o,N cOUNZy Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7541 REFUND REQUEST APPLICATION REFUND POLICY-Butte County Code 3-41(t) 1. Refunds can only be made upon written request by the person who paid the fees,whose name is on the receipt issued for the fees paid. Any refund checks will be made payable to the name on the receipt. 2. The request must be made within two years from the date of fee payments on permits not issued,and two years from the date of permit issuance for permits issued-if no construction work has been done. 3. Filing fees and plan check fees for work plans checked are not refundable. 4. Fees paid to other County Departments are not covered by this claim. INSTRUCTIONS: Submit this application to Development Services for determination of refundable fees. A claim will be generated for any fees to be refunded and sent to the address below for signature(by the person whose name is on the receipt)and return to Development Services for payment processing. CLAIMANT'S NAME: () E A NICH a LS MAILING ADDRESS: A. D• 00 US ,5W PHONE: (-53z ) 37.3-._5-Y-d ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: q - 1 D - 3 0 [Please use one claim form per permit.] BLDG PERMIT NO.: - _ _ _ _ I(� T�P� e�z Recei t No. 1 Receipt No. 2 Receipt No. 3 RECEIPT NO.: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECEIPT DATE: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECEIPT AMOUNT: I 9,,5,o(oo . 00 REASON FOR REFUND REQUEST: 114A✓> W-L(1+-09AWiJ My 1 �ePVuE ; Fb PAA-e,:iL S,01-rr' ,MY 1012t)Pi=cert' . �W � J�i2o5+�fX �/urr4��2 -rS TPM-e'5-dS. CSE�- Ai-r,k cN-G v 1 i-rr+_iz Ari D Ai-L Check those fees which you wish to have considered for refund: =Building Permit Fees =Sheriff Fees =SRA Fees (CDF Fire Planning) [Other(specify): R S nr TPry o 3-; Plans for cancelled permits will be disposed of within 10 working days upon submission of a Request for Refund. If you want the plans, you may ick them up prior to that time. Nsc H 0 . - - A 3 A0-�o Signature Date K:/F6rrri5leund Application 082203 I � � _ � � � � r . i t � r ' � ,; � r COUNTY OF BUTTE 430710 OFF/I IAL RECEIPT —7 cl^bA OFFIC O DEPARTMENT ISSUING RECEIPT Received from � The Sum of c' 4�. S.:1 Gt,4 a : �<,G $ For Received: Received By- Title y I �ir i.S 6L1 CASH ❑ Title CHECK By DAVCO BUSINESS FORMS•(530)743-8511 Form 84702 5313 11 .....4095 1210 ROGER L. NiCHOLS 0/82210112 JENNIFER L. NICHOLS -1 gOX 5 as e 5 12 PH. 873-3542 ; Oate P.O. CA 95967 PARAD4SE, $ Pay to theyr 631x -- p, sownv.� Order0f Dollars {� ` ��asaa4 H-rjo V j N Valued N.A. Customer Wells fargoBank Since 1981 California RV • wellsfargo.como�^--" Memo �� i 2 lot. 3a 21:0 l8 2 2 10 1 2n• 064-010-029 21 22 0 23 24 60' NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY , II I PURPOSES PER 94-MAPS-65 SCALE: 1 = 200 TiKA LANE I I 50' BSL 064_01 001 28 1 I TIKA I I � -LAN-E 26 _-- -'14-326 w 62328 25 ) 623— - - -- --- - --� i li PROJECT S00"10'20"E —_ __ --_ — — — -... _ -1 I r Z 27 100.00' 20 I I I 50' BSL — N88'04'35"E I I I S c I it 2360 - I I N07ES 33 34 35 36 1 L}---60' RIGHT OF WAY AND PUBLIC o I I I RESERVED EASE NMDE DS AND ENT TO BE 1. ZONING: AR 2 1/2 LOT 1 I I I I OFFERED FOR DEDICATION TO o v 1 2. GENERAL PLAN: AR 10.20 ACRES (gross) I low, I THE COUNTY OF BUTTE 1 m 9.16 ACRES (net) 1 I 1 I 3. LAND USAGE: EXISTING - VACANT LOT 2 PROPOSED - RESIDENTIAL I I I 10.09 ACRES (gross) LOCA 77ON MAP 064-010-03420' BSL-- -I I�--I I 9.18 ACRES (net) 064-010-031 4. PROJECT SURVEYOR: DOUG SUTHERLAND PLS 7970 NOT TO SCALE �i (TYPICAL) 1 I 1 220 5. SEWAGE: INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC SYSTEMS 064-010030 I I I 6. WATER: INDIVIDUAL WELLS 1 I 20' RADIU 7. POWER: PACIFIC GAS do ELECTRIC (TYPICA — _ — — — — 8. TELEPHONE: SBC L10' SL 9. CABLE: N/A ICAL) 10. STORM DRAINAGE: NATURAL SHEET FLOWS 11. OWNER: ROGER NICHOLS 5' BSL 111 P.O. BOX 512 PARADISE, CA 95967 (TYPICAL) 111 12. DEVELOPER: ROGER NICHOLS . II P.O. BOX 512 PARADISE, CA 95967 LOT 4 LOT 3 13. WELLS, TANKS AND STRUCTURES: NONE AREAS 10.05 ACRES (gross) Il 10.21 ACRES (gross) 10.01 ACRES (net) Il 10.16 ACR (net) 14. WATER QUALITY TREATMENT: SEPTIC SYSTEMS TOTAL AREA = 10.55 ACRES - Ill ;; 15. GRADING: NO GRADING PLAN REQUIRED 064-010-035 NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS = 4 III No 16. BUILDING SETBACKS PER BUTTE COUNTY CODE: SECTION 24-95.10 AVERAGE LOT SIZE = 10.14 ACRES N I 17. CONTOUR DATA BASED ON "PARADISE EAST" QUADRANGLE MAP o Ill II IIIB U l TI 111 III 4' Y 2 4 2005 I 1225.49' : % :L.. :Ih�i1F', ".I' N86'38'11"EFml ';? I066-520-006 066-520-005 I 064-010-036 TEN TA Tl VE PARCEL MAP FOR LEGEND ROGER L. NICHOLS 064-010-030 ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 3 AS PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY RECORDED IN BOOK 94 OF MAPS AT PAGE PARCEL BOUNDARY 65 ON FEBRUARY 29, 1984. SAID PARCEL - - - PROPOSED LOT LINES IN SECTION 26 TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN BSL BUILDING SETBACK LINE ROW RIGHT OF WAY o CALCULATED POINT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA �I SHEET FLOW DIRECTION NorthStar CIVIL ENGINEERS * PLANNERS * SURVEYORS 20 DECLARATION DRIVE * CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 ENGINEERING (530) 893-1600 SHEET i OF 1 AP# 064-010-030 MAY, 2005 JOB: 8881 I 1