Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
TPM 04-13_PLANNING
. A � � � Un�� U �lAnNn � � NM NN V SEPARATOR- SHEET arry l/1/b —2>� OY7 TPn�PROJECT NUMBER 04 -13 PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE NO.: TPM 04-13 PROJECT TYPE: Tentative Parcel Map APN: 006-230-047 APPLICANT: Ronald and Claudine Laffins,Trustees ADDRESS: 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace, Chico, CA 95928 PHONE: (530) 894-1603 OWNER:' Ronald J. and Claudine J. Laffins,Trustees ADDRESS: 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace, Chico, CA 95928 REPRESENTATIVE: Kenneth G. Skillman III,P.E., P.L.S. ADDRESS: Rolls, Anderson&Rolls, 115 Yellowstone Dr., Chico, CA 95973 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map application to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet LOCATED: on the east side of the Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, at 2862 Esplanade, Chico PROPERTY ZONED: C-2 (General Commercial) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: C (Commercial) TOWN/AREA: Chico 1. Application accepted: 1/15/2004 Amount: $ 1686.50 Receipt#: 394710 2. Assigned To: Stephen Betts 3. Comments sent to: Development Services Director,Public Works Director, Environmental Health, Assessor, LAFCo,Agricultural Commissioner, CDF,Building Manager, County Counsel 4. Sent to Inter-Departmental Review Committee (IDR): J R&ID4 5. Status Letter sent to applicant: 6. Date scheduled for IDR: 7. Comments received from: 8. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 9. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 10. Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No: Categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration � � Mitigation Negative Declaration Subject to Fish&Game: O Environmental Impact Report Geri. Rule Ex.—CEQA# Other 11. Staff Report: Project Video: 12. Clearinghouse circulation required: es No Date Sent to SCH: P 13. Publication Notice Written:(�-I'l�b� Display Ad Prepared:e�/ 14. Notices Mailed: o Number of Notices: 15. Newspaper Publication Date: 5� O P G B 16. Planning Commission Hearing(s): Action taken: Special Conditions: Commission Resolution No.: 17. Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): y Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: 18. Type Tentative Parcel Map/Send for signature: 19. N.O.E. /N.O.D. /APPENDIX G: Fish&Game Fees Paid: Yes No ��� /, } i Y DEPARTN*NT OF DEVELOPMEl4SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided.is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME(If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: RONALD J.LAFFINS&CLAUDINE J.LAFFINS,TRUSTEES 006-230-047 ........................................................................................ ....................................................................................... ........................................................................................ DRESS: 3255 CANYON OAK TERRACE CHICO CA 95928 AD FItsENPJIvIBER FOR02 [CUSE`»:»»>» »»»s NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT(If any) TELEPHONE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP: 2ND PARCEL FOR SWIMMING POOL CONTRACTOR (530) 894-1603 LOCATION OF PROJECT(Major cross streets and Address,if any) 2862 THE ESPLANADE,CHICO,CA lJ »>s.. :::::::::.::.:::.:::::>::>::>:.::;:;::::::>::>::.;:.::.:::.::.::::;:. RMATION..R A.................................................................................:.................. OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE RONALD J.LAFFINS&CLAUDINE J.LAFFINS,TRUSTEES ( 530 )894-1603 ADDRESS: 3255 CANYON OAK TERRACE,CHICO,CA 95928 ZONEGENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE(in Square Feet or Acres) z C2 C S 1/2:COMMERCIAL,N 1/2:VACANT TOTAL:34,939 S.F.;PARCEL 1:16,914 S.F.- PARCEL 2:18,025 S.F.. EXISTING STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) 50'x 120'=6,000 SQUARE FEET 4,840 SQUARE FEET t (Check One) (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ■ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ■ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER- <«:::>:«::<«:::::::::::;: ;>:<:::><:::: ..:::::::>::>:>::;:.:::;::<::.>::::>::>::::>::::>::::>:: APPLICA . 4N RE .UESTE .. Q..........................:.::::::..:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:::::::::::..:.............::::::::.::..........:.;:.;:::: ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMEN �I �IJ ■ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ REZONE E ru `' ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ USE PERMIT D ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑ MINOR USE PERMITJAN 5 �� ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ❑ VARIANCE ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION. ❑ MINOR VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMI PLANNING DIVISION ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ OTHER . .. FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division,describe the number and size of parcels) AN EXISTING AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR SHOP(SUPERIOR AUTO)IS SITUATED ON THE SOUTHERLY HALF OF THE PROPERTY. A SECOND COMMERCIAL BUILDING(FOR A SWIMMING POOL CONTRACTOR)IS PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION ON THE NORTH HALF OF THE EXISTING PARCEL. THE APPLICANT DESIRES TO SUBDIVIDE THE EXISTING 34,939 SQUARE FOOT €<z PARCEL INTO TWO SMALLER PARCELS OF 16,914 SQUARE FEET AND 18,025 SQUARE FEET,RESPECTIVELY. :..::::::.... .................................................... O: NER.CERTIFI T N:'. ::::< " «::«:::<:::<:::<:::<::::>::::::.:<::.<:::<:::<::.:::::<:::<:::<:::<::>::>::>:::.::.::::>:::;.....:... :::>::>::>::>::............................................................................................................ . . . zy DATE: 15 '4 SIGNATURE:. p I o.� , DATE: SIGNATURE: C:\Data\PROJECTS\03184\Uniform App-120303.wpd 120303 1 i� 1 a6� ' r_J 1 i d.�..u.� _. .--� Y----..,,�,,,_..._._--�.....�. f AGENT AUTHORIZATION TO: Butte County, Department of Development Services: KENNETH G. SKILLMAN III, P.E. , P.L.S. Phone.Number5( 30 ) 895 - 1422 Print Name ROLLS, ANDERSON & ROLLS, 115 YELLOWISTONE `DRIVE, CHICO, CA 95973-5811 Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process the application for RONALD J. LAFFINS & CLAUDINE J. LAFFINS, TRUSTEES on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number: APN# 006 _ 230 _ 047 This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) RONALD J. LAFFINS CLAUDINE J. LAFFINS Print Name Print Name Signature Signature Architect and/or Engineer: KENNETH G. SKILLMAN III, P.E. , P.L.S. Phone Number 5( 30 ) 895 - 1422 Print Name of Architect/Engineer ROLLS, ANDERSON & ROLLS, 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE, CHICO, CA 95973-5811 Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: Q Total Amount Received: c-1 Lo V.to - Sc) 9' AP Number(s) [;,egal Description, 2 Owners Authorization oning Requirements EVProject Description U2,Copies of plot plan Taken by: i"—�eS Receipt No. 3 �� PW/LD 2410,00 Plan, 00 .00 E.H. 1. CDF •D0 NOD/NOEFees -&0•00 Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit(Any unused portion of a deposit)will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is as of Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". K WORMSMIFORM APPLICATION Page 2 of 2 �• -;, ' II E' ! � � - RAR ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS CIVIL ENGINEERS Kenneth G. Skillman III, P.E., P.L.S. 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973-5811 TELEPHONE 530-895-1422 • FAX 530-8951409 r AGENT AUTHORIZATION TO: Butte County, Department of Development Services: KENNETH G. SKILLMAN III , P.E. , P.L.S. Phone Number5( 30 ) 895 - 1422 Print Name ROLLS, ANDERSON & ROLLS, 115 YELLOUISTONE 'DRIVE, CHICO, CA 95973-5811 Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process the application for RONALD J. LAFFINS & CLAUDINE J. LAFFINS; TRUSTEES on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number: APN# 006 _ 230 _ 047 This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents . necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) RONALD J. LAFFINS CLAUDINE J. LAFFINS Print Name Print Name Id Signature Signature Architect and/or Engineer: KENNETH G. SKILLMAN III, P.E. , P.L.S. Phone Number 5( 30 ) 895 - 1422 Print Name of Architect/Engineer ROLLS, ANDERSON & ROLLS, 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE, CHICO, CA 95973-581'1 Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY . Verify: a, Date Received: O Total Amount Received: cam' to t. •'So AP Number(s) [Legal Description Q Owners Authorization oning Requirements Project Description copies of plot plan Taken by: eS Receipt No. 3-9.71-1 10 PW/LD 24t0,00 Plan 1100 .00 E.H. CDF •00 NOD/NOEFees —&P•DO Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit(Any unused portion of a deposit)will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is as of Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". K WORMM\UNIFORM APPLICATION Page 2 of 2 COUNTY OF BUTTE.. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed 1 S 6 General Information: 1. Name and address of owner,and/or project sponsor: Ronald I. Laffins, Sr. & Claudine I. Laffins, Trustees of the Ronald I. Laffins, Sr., &Claudine I:Laffins Trust dated February 17, 2000, as the sole and separate property of Ronald 1. Laffins,Sr. A 2. Address of project: 2862 Esplanade, Chico, CA 95973 Assessor's Parcel Number: 006-230-047 3. Name,address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Kenneth G. Skillman III, Rolls,Anderson & Rolls, 115 Yellowstone Drive, Chico, CA 95973-5811, (530) 895-1422 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: Parcel Map& Building Permit 5. Existing general plan designation: C 6. Existing zoning district: C2 7. How is land currently used? South half commercial, north half vacant but presently a commercial building,.is under construction. 8. Proposed use of site(Project for which form is filed): North 1/2: Swimming Pool Contractor;South 1/2: Existing Automotive Repair and Services Shoo Project Description: 9. Site size: Total: 34,939 S.F., Parcel 1: 16.914 S.F., Parcel 2: 18,025 S.F. (Acres/Sq.Feet) 10. Off-street parking-spaces: Full size: Parcel 1: 19.5 Spaces, Parcel 2: 15.5 Spaces Compact: Parcel 1: 0 Spaces, Parcel 2: 0 Spaces Total: Parcel 1: 19.5 Spaces, Parcel 2: 15.5 Spaces 11. Plans attached Yes X No 12. Proposed development schedule' The south half is existing;the north half is under construction and will be completed within the next four or five months(weather permitting). 13. Associated projects None 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development Not Applicable ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services❑Planning Division❑ 1 . Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents,and type of household size expected. Not Applicable 16. If commercial, indicate the type,whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. See additional information sheets attached. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift,and loading facilities. Not Applicable 18. If institutional,.indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. Not Applicable 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit(s) "A" (Building Permit)and "B" (Septic System Inspection Certificate). Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets if necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or X substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or _ X public lands or roads. 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. _ X 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. X 24. Change in dust,ash, smoke,fumes or odors in vicinity. _ X 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or _ X quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels of the _ X vicinity. 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. _ X 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as _ X toxic substances,flammable or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services _ X (police,fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption _ X (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. _ X i ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services❑Planning Division❑ 2 i :�.. �. .y,r, �.�,� �� .r "r�`: ?s `� is x.f. • r s Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals,and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. See additional information sheets attached. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural; historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use(one family,apartment houses, shops,department stores, etc.)and scale of development (height,frontage, set-back, rear yard,etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid will be accepted. See additional information sheets attached. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the.attached exhibits present the data and . information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability,and the facts, statements,and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signature for Cm. Gk-111 ^ —UIZ., A3an* DI i 5/04 ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services❑ Planning Division❑ 3 COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHEET 16. A 4,840 square foot office/shop building is currently under construction fora swimming pool contractor. 32. The existing project site is flat and planer comprised of stable silt to silty loam soils. No animals were encountered during our site visit of November 21, 2003 and the only plants observed consisted of the landscaping fronting the Esplande. The southwesterly half of the site has already been developed as an automotive repair shop and parking lot. The north half is under construction to build a pool contractor's office and shop and associated parking lot. No cultural, historical or scenic aspects of the site were observed. TO CLINIC _ 2, ri 1 7 D E C E � W E JAN 15 2004 BUTTE COUNTY Pi pnpl�r!ic,OIIlfCION A' a~� �- �y v. :F � 3. T S 'Aa i, `Fc1. r � ',� )+r�a1'• �' t � t +_ � ■ _� yip p'ff c'IG 1 _ ,_ 13 JA r ��HH"^��.0�'1—`�„�,��a�, _—.�j° �i'1_ ,���'4..''�r; -.fir:-a. 'i�.-. �.Y r��..:1 1. ,`.., t •(k ',���t.L 1 � ECEIVE COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHEET q �7 MINI a �! � ,•�wf�� �`yy "' C- '�-"..s*r`�•'�..� b+r%t �fY�tr�+�,1: J` �-e^a r ! • + c.r rr- ' �1 tt Pte_b��l����`,c., f',t.�. 'r,. �"'-j"r',�"'6 �y4•'!., .� __ ����' ., "4¢� ; {'�•'�'f o-•:�Tf,�rti�'4'�Y�rx/�_ rµ1�'u�►,;�. a r i7i+rtfijj j �•-��P.i.. s a .j� ' ^`y T#- Q �� S ' v ..i V •,�R'� _ f P `A;+lltTj 1 �•• Pii p�� er_ _ M,MAIM L jir .. IL �►� � � MRA -__- lam- ` �•� '��_�����=� � � ' � + rlaw aa �� ,�9.r.�,�:.'�;l��il'�. �.tet•`'.001 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBDIVISION MAP WAIVER APPLICATION APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their application packet. Please include this checklist along with you submittal. Applicant Planner 1. p Complete a Pre-Application Review with the Environmental Health Division for on-site sewage disposal requirements for the proposed use. The Environmental Health Division charges a fee for this review. 2. ?C❑ VA completed, signed, Uniform Application and Environmental Information form. If the application i s s igned b y a n a gent f or t he owner,.a n a gent a uthorization f orm in ust b e submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. 3. L1Q Payment of the currently required Application Fees and/or Deposits (Any unused portion of the deposit will be returned to the applicant upon final action). (Planner advises applicant) 4. El' �A preliminary title report showing current ownership and dated within 6 months of the application submittal shall be filed with the application. 5. ® VTwenty-two (22) copies of the map, including a detailed site plan drawn to scale, shall be submitted. Additional copies of the m ap's hall be made available b y t he applicant or engineer/surveyor t o C ounty D epartments u pon r equest. A 11 m aps s hall b e d rawn o n uniform size sheets no less than 18"X 26". The finished map shall be folded to 8 %"x 11". The detailed map must include: a. Name, business address of person who prepared the map. b.. Proposed property lines and lot dimensions. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED,THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. I Applicant Planner c. Assessor Parcel Number(s). The street address (if available). Tract name and date, if applicable. d. Vicinity Map indicating the location of the land in relation to the nearest major roads, significant topographic features, surrounding area or region. e. Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed, public and private, improvements on the property.(including,but not limited to,buildings,driveways,parking areas,wells, septic tanks, sewer lines, leach fields, utilities, and street lights.) WA � A f. ❑ ❑ Wells which are to be abandoned shall be shown and identified as "well to be abandoned". The wells shall be properly abandoned under permit issued by the Butte County Division of Environmental Health. N/A N l a g. ❑ ❑ Buildings which are to be removed will be identified as"building to be removed". The buildings shall be properly removed or demolished under permit issued by the Butte County Building Division. h. The existing and proposed location, name, width, approximate grades and radii of curves of all roads, streets, highways for the subdivision and within 100 feet of the exterior boundaries thereof. All streets shall be labeled as to whether it is public or private. 1. © Topographic contours and water features,at a minimum,to be as shown on the current USGS 7.5 minute quad map. WA , j. ❑ For subdivisions that have a density of 4 dwellings/ac or greater in the Urban Area or 1 acre lots or smaller in the Rural Area and which also have an average slope of 20% or greater, a conceptual or preliminary grading plan shall be submitted showing the approximate finished pad elevations for each lot and all cut and fill slopes proposed which are 5 feet or greater in height. This requirement may be waived by the Director of Development Services if it is found not to be needed. ' Waived ❑ YES ❑ NO ►J/q k. ❑ Approximate location of all FEMA identified 100 year floodplain areas,if any,and the location, width and direction of flow of all ephemeral water courses, if any. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED,THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 2 • i Applicant Planner I. Q Sufficient information on the map to determine adequacy of the proposed drainage and flood control measures, including but not limited to, proposed easements, and facilities. m. ® The approximate widths, location and purpose of all known existing or proposed easements. n. © EX North arrow and scale of drawing. All maps shall be drawn to an engineering scale of a size sufficient to reasonably show all required features. A north arrow preferably oriented to the top of sheet. If not connecting to public sewer and water, the following applies: 6. ® LJ The proposed source of domestic water and proposed method of sewage disposal. If the project is not served by community sewer and/or community water, include soils/percolation/ground water data and water availability data sufficient to allow the Division of Environmental Health to complete their review of the project. Your application will be incomplete unless this information is provided or waived, in writing, by the Division of Environmental Health. 5 EE ATr'Ac H E,D Environmental Health Waived ❑ YES ❑ NO 56?TI G SYSTE M I NSPEGT IV N GE.RTIFIc,ATE " 7. ❑ FA A written request for any exceptions to the subdivision standards pursuant to Section 20-4 of the Butte County Code, if applicable. Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required.environmental review documents,as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. Signature: Date: Applicant/Representative Signature: 2A7 Date: Planner Receiving Application K:\Planning\FORMS\Submittal\CHECKLIS\TT(2)B.WPD IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED,THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 3 i� >�; .. li=.. i =, Project No: ( � ! APN: Applicant: Issued: r Renewal Date: Date Description Amount Receipt Check# L6 L t � BUTTE COUNTY PLANNIN(t COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT-SEPTEMBER 22,-2005 Applicant: Ronald&Claudine Laffins, Location: On the east side of Trustees Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, at `2862 & 2866 Esplanade, Chico L \\ C) File#: TPM 04-13 Parcel Size: 0.80 acres (34,939 square feet) Request: Tentative Parcel Map to Supervisor 3 ; divide a 34,939 square foot District: parcel into one parcel of �• � 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet. G.P.: Commercial Planner: Carl Durling Associate Planner Zoning: C-2 (General Commercial)'..- Attachments: A: General Plan/Zoning Map Zone Date: March 4, 1980 0 B: January 11, 2005 APN: 006-230-047�.L C: Initial Study OnD: Site Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a 1.entative Parcel Map to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square�feetand�(ne parcel of 18,025 square feet. The proposed parcels are, and would continue to be, utilized Zfor 6ommercial uses. The project is consistent with the C-2 zone and with the Butte ,d ,\�, `,J County,General Plan land use designation of Commercial, as well as the policies of the other elements of the General Plan. The applicant is requesting an exception to reduce the street width from 60 feet to 41 feet in order to match with the existing driveway and parking area. Connection to sewer is required because the parcel split does not meet Appendix VII standards. Staff recommends approval of this project with findings and conditions. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ September 22, 2005 0 Agenda Report - Laffins TPM 04-13 ■ Page 1 of 12 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: • This project is a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet for general commercial uses. Both of the proposed parcels are developed with commercial uses: Proposed Parcel 1 with an automobile repair business ("Superior Auto") and proposed Parcel 2 with a swimming pool business ("Blue Haven Pools"). • Sewage disposal for the existing commercial uses on the site is handled by two existing on- site septic systems. • Domestic water is obtained from the California Water Service Company. • Proposed Parcel 1 would front on Esplanade, and proposed Parcel would ave access to Esplanade via a proposed 41-foot wide road easement across Parcel 1�(N6te: The proposed 41-foot wide road access does not meet County standards for minimumright-of-way width (Butte County Code Section 20-.134) and does not meet the requirements to be allowed as a private driveway access (Butte County Code Section 20113:6:),The project Engineer has also requested an exception to the requirement for construction of the access road to the RS-2 road standard with curbs, gutters and sidewalks, noting4hat the existing development on the property and the existing parking lot structural section is adequate for the proposed traffic. (Note: An RS-2 standard road is 49 feet frorfi�back of sidewalk to back of sidewalk and will not fit into a 41 foot wide right of way.) SITE CHARACTERISTICS: o • The project site is developed with"iw&commercial uses. • The project site is almost comp llet ly covered with structures or pavement. • A sewer lateral extends•fromthe septic system on the eastern portion of the site to Esplanade, where it is stubbed t. • The site is level and-=does not contain any native vegetation. Non-native landscaping is located on theEsplanade frontage and an almond tree is located behind the Blue Haven Pools building. �� • The project,si�te does not contain any drainages, including creeks, swales, or wetlands. • e�veral�,storm water drainage inlets are located on the project site, which drain into the City of�Chico ge s drainage system. • The frontaof the project_site is immoved with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. • A fire hydrant is located on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 100 feet north of the project site. • Sewer and storm water drainage lines are located along Esplanade. • The site io cated within a 100-year flood zone_ U Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ September 22, 2005 0 Agenda Report - Laffins TPM 04-13 ■ Page 2 of 12 1i • The project site is located approximately 1.9 miles from the main runway at the Chico Municipal Airport and is located within Airport Compatibility Zone "D" of the Chico Municipal Airport. There are no restrictions on land uses for parcels within the "D" Compatibility Zone. • The site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and has a General Plan designation of Commercial. Surr>�ng parcels are zoned C_2,_ A-R (Agricultural Residential), or are within the City of Chico. The project site is within the City of Chico's Sphere of Infl e. • The site is located in a primarily commercial area, although urban residential uses are bated to the east of the site. ANALYSIS: • The sizes of the proposed parcels are consistent with the C-2 zone~;wh hidoenot pecify a minimum parcel size. The minimum size of a parcel in the C:2 is dependent on the area needed for the commercial use, on-site sewage disposal, and parki g requirements. • The project is consistent with the Commercial General Pl a lse designation, which does not specify a minimum parcel size. �� c • The project would not result in any additional?ehicular trips because the project site is already developed with two commercial usesDti_the small sizes of the proposed parcels, there would be no opportunity for additional commercial development on the parcels. • The project would not have any impacts onsaircraft operations nor expose people on the project site to significant levels ofinoise from aircraft operations. • The project would not have any impact on any agricultural uses because the project site is located more than 300 feet from—any agricultural use and from any parcel zoned for agricultural use or designates da s Orchard and Field Crops. • The project site is require d to'connect to the City of Chico sewer system prior to recordation the parcel map. (�T�eason is that the parcel split reduces the net useable area for a septic tank-leachfield area below the Appendix VII improvement standards for subdivisions. Connection to the City's sewer system will require that the project parcels annex into the City of Chico. �� • A request for�comments concerning this project was sent to the City of Chico. The City had u — ��t``he follo ing comments: 4",,/�The pproject should connect to the City's sanitary sewer system since the sewer main is L �located nearby. 2. Annexation into the City of Chico will be required in order to connect to the sanitary sewer system. 3. elopment on Parcel 2 should incorporate a 50%o_shadin-�of parking lot areas (note: o Q� Co ty Planning Staff does n,of concur with this requirement at this point because Parcel ` 2 is lready developed and imposition of the 50% shading requirement as a tentative map L ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ 0 September 22, 2005 0 Agenda Report - Laffins TPM 04-13 ■ Page 3 of 12 0 condition is not feasible. When Parcel 2 is redeveloped in the future, particularly with a use that would require a use permit, the shading requirement would be an appropriate consideration.) • The Butte County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) commented on this project and recommends that the project parcel annex into the City of Chico in order to provide public sewage and storm water drainage services. EXCEPTION REQUESTS: • As previously mentioned, access from Esplanade to Parcel 2 is proposed to--b-e via 41-foot Dd wide right-of-way road easement across Parcel 1. • The proposed 41-foot wide right-of-way easement depot_mee�C.�u-ty standards f access. Butte Lounty Code Section 20-134 requires a minimum,60=foot street right-of-way, �g�Ger but z�oot wide right-of-way may be permitted for local acc ss--street, short through 11 streets, or unusual situations where a cul-de-sac is appropriate. • The project Engineer has also requested an exception to�he quirement for construction of G the access road to the RS-2 road standard with cdr-bs, gutters and sidewalks, noting the I existing development on the property and that the existing parking lot structural section is adequate for the proposed traffic. (Note: An RS-2 sta)n&rd road is 49 feet from back of sidewalk to back of sidewalk and will not fit�into a 41 foot wide right of way.) • The applicant's engineer has requested Cceptions pursuant to Butte County Code Section 20-4 ("Exceptions to Design Requirements-This section of Butte County Code allows the hearing body to grant an exception to any of the requirements and regulations relative to the design of a subdivision, provided I theJollowing facts apply with respect to the subject property: ���� � a. That there are spee.ccial�ci'rcumstances or conditions of topography or size or shape or locat n�or(�istting development affecting the property, which circumstances, ons conditior development existed at the time the application for the map was determ'i'nedor deemed to be complete. b. Th t,tthe granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the territory in which the property is situated. • The applicant s engineer citesejcisting deve as the reason why the exceptions should be,granted. The applicant's engineer states that granting of the 41-foot wide right-of- way,easement would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the project area. The exception request is attached to this report as Attachment B, letter of January 11, 2005. • Denial of the exception request would require that a minimum 50-foot wide right-of-way easement be established on proposed Parcel 2. Parking would not be allowed within the right-of-way easement, which would eliminate numerous existing parking. spaces for the commercial business on Parcel 1. The elimination of these parking spaces would not give the ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ September 22, 2005 0 Agenda Report - Laffins TPM 04-13 0 Page 4 of 12 0 existing commercial business on Parcel 1 sufficient parking spaces to meet the parking requirements of Butte County Code. • Denial of the exception request would also require construction of the access road to parcel 2 to the RS-2 road standard which would require construction of curbs, gutters and sidewalks through Parcel 1. CEQA ISSUES: The initial study prepared for this project determined there would be environmental i4acts to the following areas: • Air Quality (dust control during site development activities) • Cultural Resources (possible disturbance of archaeological resources) The initial study, which is attached to this agenda report, recommende\tl o mitigation measures to reduce environmental impacts to a less than significant level. T�he,.collec ion of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR 753.5 is not`�req fired because the project would not cause an impact to fish or wildlife or their habitat." d ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: AA An Initial Study has been prepared for this project bAounty staff. Staff determined, based on a review of the Initial Study, that project impart t�can be fully mitigated. The initial study/mitigated negative declaration was {sent to the Governor's Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse, for a 30-day— ver iew period (SCH # 2004092044). Notices regarding the 30-day review periodew re mailed to landowners near the project site, and a notice was placed in the Chico Enterprise Record.° ACTION FOR CONSR"ON: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: I. Adopt a Mitigate, Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. A--n itial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Qd ahty Act. Said study identified significant environmental effects and included a mitigation measures that would mitigate such effects below significant levels; a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. \ B The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative ' Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. C. On the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study and any comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the Tentative Parcel Map for Ronald & Claudine Laffins, Trustees, Planning Division File No. TPM 04-13, would have a significant effect on the environment. The custodian of the record is the Land Development Division of the Public Works ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ 0 September 22, 2005 0 Agenda Report - Laffins TPM 04-13 0 Page 5 of 12 0 Department. The location of the record is 7 County Center Drive, Oroville CA 95965. D. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. E. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts, with Mitigation Measures 1 through 2, as detailed in the Agenda Report dated September 22, 2005. II. Adopt a "de minimis" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or�their habitat. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The collection of fees pursuant(o Fih and Game Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR 753.5 is not required. The project site is known to contain any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CaliforniI)epartment of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The project wiMnot�have as substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat; have a substantial adverse�'ef fe'ct'on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Wae/(ernActyinterfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory, fish )wildlife species; conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources; or conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. III. A. Grant an exception to Butte Coouht.yp'.' ection 20-134 to allo a 41-foot wide right-of-way access easement to p� o�ed—Parce 2, su sect to the following findings: a. The existing development on the project site, which consists of two commercial structures, drainage ant sewage improvements, and parking spaces, preclude a 50-foot wide right-of-wayy easement from being created to provide access to Parcel 2. b. The granting rof t is exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the territory in which the property is situated bec use the proposed 41-foot road right-of-way would allow adequate vehicular access, including access for fire trucks, to Parcel 2. In addition, there is no need \heywider right-of-way easement for future extension a road to the east `Il ` &cduse existing residential development on the east is currently served by a cul- 1 dY,sac road. t Grant an exception to the Butte bounty Improvement :St=andard:s][e>ting the requirement for construction of ttie access road to proposed Parcel 2 to the RS-2 standard, subject to the following findings: a. The existing development on the project site, which consists of two commercial structures, drainage and sewage improvements, and parking spaces, provides vehicular access and appropriate drainage to Parcel 2. b. Existing commercial development on the site has demonstrated that construction of additional sidewalks is not necessary. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ 0 September 22, 2005 ■ Agenda Report - Laffins TPM 04-13 0 Page 6 of 12 0 G f, 1 K. S 1 t•. C. The granting of this exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the territory in which the property is situated because the existingimprovements allow adequate vehicular access including p q g access for fire trucks, to Parcel 2. IV. Approve Tentative Parcel Map 04-13 for Ronald & Claudine Laffins, Trustees, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit"A" and the following findings:- A. The proposed map is consistent with the following Butte County General-Plan Goals and Policies: '> 1.7.a. Encourage development in and around existing comrn'unitie�s.�with public facilities. 1.7.b. Promote the full utilization of sites served by existing public facilities. \��' 7.1.a. Consider fire hazards in all land use and zoning-decisions, environmental review, subdivision review and the provision of public services. B. The design and improvements of the propose�ubdivision are consistent wit County standards nd policies provided all conations of project approval a e 0W . C. The project is physically suit�efor e use and density of the propose development because the project site is vel, does not contain any drainages, and is not within a 100-year flood D. The design and improyements of the project will not cause public health or safety problems because the,project, site does not contain any physical characteristics that could cause health r safety concerns with the provided mitigations. E. The design and improvements of the project will not conflict with easements acquired by theppub'lic at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision provided the attached conditions are met. F. The proot site is not located within an earthquake fault zone. G. The project would not have an impact to any aircraft operations because the projecAite is located within Airport Compatibility Zone "D", which does not ,�ave any restrictions on land uses, and because no existing or proposed structures �° would extend more than 100 feet above ground level. Approval of this project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and \ welfare provided the required conditions and mitigation measures are ra' M I. The project is consistent with the Commercial General Plan land use designation. J. The project site is located more than 300 feet from any agricultural use (including agri-ul.tural processing uses) and more than 300 feet from any Agricultural zoning district or Orchard and Field Crops designated parcels. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ 0 September 22, 2005 0 Agenda Report - Laffins TPM 04-1.3 0 Page 7 of 12 0 �i ' ' „y °V .t . �l ' ' , M1 1 ?H ' IM$tJECT COORDINATION FO Date of IDR: September 7, 2005 PLANNER: Carl Durling PROJECT NAME: Laffins Trustees PROJECT NUMBER: TPM 04-13 TYPE: Tentative Parcel Map APN: 006-230-047 DEPARTMENT COMMENTS READY FOR HEARING? PLANNING PUBLIC WORKS i ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH f COUNTY COUNSEL dam/ j✓ �� �1�K�V� _2 1-2 7 _ - �"�� BUILDING ASSESSOR FIRE K:/IDR Agendas/Project Coordination Form.doc BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSI" AGENDA REPORT ' OCTOBER 13, 2005 — Applicant: 3, 2005 . .Applicant: Ronald& Claudine Laffins, Location: On the �ea'st . `de of Trustees Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, at 2862, & 28'66> Esplanade Chico File#: TPM 04-13 ParcelkSize: ® 80 acres (34;,939°square . feet) Request: Tentative Par=e] . Map . to Supervisor 3 s v� divide"a 34,939squuare .foot District: parcel into one parcel of ' 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 squarefeet. ` G P.:, Commercial , Planner: Carl Durling '' 0hel Planner Zoning:` C- (General Commercial) Attachments: A: General Plan/Zoning Map ZoneDate: arch.4, 1980. January lv, 2005 APN: ' 006-213®-047 "C: Ini'tal S:t�iy S,it6Plan . N EX�E,C UtTIV4ENSUM=MAR Thsis a Tentative ParcehMap to divide a 349.39 square„foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and o parc l of 18,625 square feE e'Proposed parcels are, and would continue to V NN ° �be, utihzedf�or commercial.uses. The p oject is.consistent with the C-2 zone and with the Butte CountyGenera5lPlan1'anduse designation of Commercial, as well as the policies of the other, . else frneents ofhhee GeneralNPllann. The ppl -of ' requesting an exception to reduce the street width To 60 feet� �to 41 feet m o:der to�,match with the existing driveway and parking area. Connection to ewer isre uid because the parcel split does not meet Appendix VII standards. Staff�recommends approvalof th s o�ect with findings and conditions. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services IP ■ October 13, 2005 ■ Agenda Report- Laffins TPM 04-13 ■ Page l of 15 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: • This project is a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet for general commercial uses. Both of the proposed parcels are developed with commercial uses: Proposed Parcel 1 with an automobile repair business ("Superior Auto") and proposed Parcel 2 with a swimming pool business ("Blue Haven Pools"). • Sewage disposal for the existing commercial uses on the site is handled by two existin on- site septic systems. ' • Domestic water is obtained from the California Water Service Company. • Proposed Parcel 1 would front on Esplanade, and proposed Parcel 2�w have access to Esplanade via a proposed 41-foot wide road easement acrosssAar,c 1-(Note: The proposed 41-foot wide road access c o not meet County standard>or m nim right-of-way width (Butte County Code Section 20-134) and does not meet the requirements to be allowed as a private driveway access (Butte County Code Section 20-� 36.)The project Engineer has also requested an exception to the requirement for construction of the access road to the RS-2 road standard with curbs, gutters and sidewalks,';noting that the existing development on the property and the existing parking lot structural sectionris adequate for the proposed traffic. (Note: An RS-2 standard road is 49 feet from back of sidewalk to back of sidewalk and will not fit into a 41 foot wide right of way.) h; • There is no need for the wider right-of:way�easement for future extension a road to the east because existing residential development,onthe east is currently served by a cul-de-sac road. 11 The mixing of commercial and r�s�ideritial traffic is detrimental to a stable residential community. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: • The project site iss&vel we'd with two commercial uses. • The project site is almbst completely covered with structures or pavement. • A sewer lai\e�ra ext ds from the septic system on the eastern portion of the site to Esplanade, here Ai's\stu�bed out. •v\Thee9 to revel and does not contain any native vegetation. Non-native landscaping is located on the Esplanade frontage and an almond tree is located behind the Blue Haven Pools building. • The project site does not contain any drainages, including creeks, swales, or wetlands. • Several storm water drainage inlets are located on the project site, which drain into the City of Chico's drainage system. • The frontage of the project site is improved with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ October 13, 2005 0 Agenda Report- Laffins TPM 04-13 ■ Page 2 of 15 ■ • A fire hydrant is located on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 100 feet north of the project site. • Sewer and storm water drainage lines are located along Esplanade. • The site is not located within a 100-year flood zone. • The project site is located approximately 1.9 miles from the main runway at the Chico Municipal Airport and is located within Airport Compatibility Zone "D" of the Chico Municipal Airport. There are no restrictions on land uses for parcels within the "D" Compatibility Zone. J • The site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and has a General Plan(esignation of Commercial. Surrounding parcels are zoned C-2 A-R (Agricultural/Residential) or are within the City of Chico. The project site is within the City of Chico's Sphere of Influence. • The site is located in a primarily commercial area, although eurban residential uses are located� �e to the east of the site. ANALYSIS: • The sizes of the proposed parcels are consistent�ith the C-2 zone, which does not specify a minimum parcel size. The minimum size of a parcel'n the C-2 is dependent on the area needed for the commercial use, on-site sewage disposal, and parking requirements. • The project is consistent with the Commercial eneral Plan land use designation, which does not specify a minimum parcel size. • The project would not result nl an ,additional vehicular trips because the project site is already developed with two�commercial uses. Due to the small sizes of the proposed parcels, there would be no opportunity for additional commercial development on the parcels. • The project would4 of have any impacts on aircraft operations nor expose people on the project site to significant\levels of noise from aircraft operations. • The project would no\chave any impact on any agricultural uses because the project site is located more;;than 3.00 feet from any agricultural use and from any parcel zoned for agricultural use or designated as Orchard and Field Crops. • T;he\project,site is required to connect to the City of Chico sewer system prior to recordation eof the-parcel'inap. The reason is that the parcel split reduces the net useable area for a septic tank-leachfield area below the Appendix VII improvement standards for subdivisions. Connection to the City's sewer system will require that the project parcels annex into the City of Chico. • A request for comments concerning this project was sent to the City of Chico. The City had the following comments: 1. The project should connect to the City's sanitary sewer system since the sewer main is located nearby. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ October 13, 2005 0 Agenda Report - Laffins TPM 04-13 0 Page 3 of 15 0 C VAnnexation into the City of Chico will be required in order to connect to the sanitary sewer system. 3. Development on Parcel 2 should incorporate a 50% shading of parking lot areas (note: County Planning Staff does not concur with this requirement at this point because Parcel 2 is already developed and imposition of the 50% shading requirement as a tentative map condition is not feasible. When Parcel 2 is redeveloped in the future, particularly with a use that would require a use permit, the shading requirement would be an appropriate consideration.) ' • The Butte County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) commented�on this project and recommends that the project parcel annex into the City of C&co order to provide public sewage and storm water drainage services. EXCEPTION REQUESTS: • As previously mentioned, access from Esplanade to Parc '1 2 is pr' to be via a 41-foot wide right-of-way road easement across Parcel 1. • The proposed 41-foot wide right-of-way easement does not meet County standards for access. Butte County Code Section 20-134 requires a minimum 60-foot street right-of-way, but a 50-foot wide right-of-way may be permitted folocal access street, short through streets, or unusual situations where a cul-de-saAi propriate: an e • The project Engineer has also iequested ce, - ion to the requirement for construction of the access road to the RS-2 road standard with curbs, gutters and sidewalks, noting the existing development on the pope and that the existing parking lot structural section is adequate for the proposed naffi°c. ('Note�,! An RS-2 standard road is 49 feet from back of sidewalk to back of sidewalk and will not fit into a 41 foot wide right of way.) • The applicant's engineer Kks,,,,requested exceptions pursuant to Butte County Code Section 20-4 ("Exceptions,t�oo Design Req iu rements"). This section of Butte County Code allows the hearing body to granta� exception to any of the requirements and regulations relative to the design of a subd-ivision provided the following facts apply with respect to the subject property: tea. Rhhha there are special circumstances or conditions of topography or size or shape or lova ion or existing development affecting the property, which circumstances, conditions or development existed at the time the application for the map was te dermined or deemed to be complete. ' That the granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or i-b� r injurious to other property in the territory in which the property is situated. i • The applicant's engineer cites the existing development as the reason why the exceptions should be granted. The applicant's engineer states that granting of the 41-foot wide right-of- way easement would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in roJect area. The exception request is attached to this report as Attachment B, letter of ( January 11, 2005. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ October 13, 2005 ■ Agenda Report- Laffins TPM 04-13 ■ Page 4 of 15 ■ I _ • Denial of the exception request would require that a minimum 50-foot wide right-of-way easement be established on proposed Parcel 2. Parking would not be allowed within the right-of-way easement, which would eliminate numerous existing parking spaces for the commercial business on Parcel 1. The elimination of these parking spaces would not give the existing commercial business on Parcel 1 sufficient parking spaces to meet the parking requirements of Butte County Code. • Denial of the exception request would also require construction of the access road to�parcel 2 to the RS-2 road standard which would require construction of curbs, gutters land sidewalks t o PaI ~—_—. SUES: " y The initial study prepared for this project determined there would be environmentafimpacts to the following areas: • Air Quality (dust control during site development activ'fi` • Cultural Resources (possible disturbance of archaeological resources) The initial study, which is attached to this agenda report, recom- rided two mitigation measures to reduce environmental impacts to a less than significant level, The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR53�5Dis not required because the project would not cause an impact to fish or wildlife or their,h tat. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATIO An Initial Study has been preparedJor t is project by County staff. Staff determined, based on a review of the Initial Study, that proj'ect`s impacts can be fully mitigated. The initial study/mitigated ne ative declaration was sent to the Governor's Office of Planningand g � \ �` Research, State Clearinghouse, for_„a�30-day review period (SCH # 2004092044). Notices regarding the 30-day revi period were mailed to landowners near the project site, and a notice was placed in the Chico Enterprise Record. ACTION FOR cop SIDERATION: Staff recomm�en ' at the Planning Commission take the following actions: I. / Adopta-\1Vlitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings: An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study identified significant environmental effects and included mitigation measures that would mitigate such effects below significant levels; a i Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. B. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. C. On the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study and any comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ 0 October 13, 2005 0 Agenda Report- Laffins TPM 04-13 0 Page 5 of 15 0 it Tentative Parcel Ma for Ronald & Claudine Laffins Trustees Planning Division P g File No. TPM 04-13, would have a significant effect on the environment. The custodian of the record is the Land Development Division of the Public Works Department. The location of the record is 7 County Center Drive, Oroville CA 95965. D. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. E. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding environmentalirrt1a�[cts,'�,ith Mitigation Measures 1 through 2, as detailed in the Agenda Repotdated September 22, 2005. YY II. Adopt a "de minimis" exemption regarding impact to fish and wil,"e or their habitat. The design of the proposed project improvements will not c�ausse envuo mental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The collection of feesvur u'nt,to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR 753.5 is not required> h� projet site is not known to contain any species identified as a candidate, sensitiv'�e, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the aliforni'�a Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The project w"i"1"1-not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat; have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratoryJfish or wildlife species; conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources; or conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. ✓ i III. A. Grant an exception to Butte-County Code Section 20-134 to allow a 41-foot wide right-of-way acc-ss�keasemenl to proposed Parcel 2, subject to the following findings: a. The existing development on the project site, which consists of two commercial structures,, drainagenn sewage improvements, and parking spaces, preclude a 50-foot wide right-of-way easement from being created to provide access to Parcels2' b. The gr% g of this exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or i ju ous t other property in the territory in which the property is situated o �, ,ly because the proposed 41-foot road right-of-way would allow adequate vehicular ac cess, including access for fire trucks, to Parcel 2. In addition, there is no need yor the wider right-of-way easement for future extension a road to the east because existing residential development on the east is currently served by a cul- de-sac road, and mixing the traffic of commercial and residential uses is detrimental to a stable residential community. B. Grant an exception to the Butte County Improvement Standards deleting the requirement for construction of the access road to proposed Parcel 2 to the RS-2 standard, subject to the following findings: I ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ 0 October 13, 2005 0 Agenda Report- Laffins TPM 04-13 0 Page 6 of 15 ■ a. The existing development on the project site, which consists of two commercial structures, drainage and sewage improvements, and parking spaces, provides vehicular access and appropriate drainage to Parcel 2. b. Existing commercial development on the site has demonstrated that construction of additional sidewalks is not necessary. C. The granting of this exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the territory in which the property is situated because the existing improvements allow adequate vehicular access., including access for fire trucks, to Parcel 2. N. Approve Tentative Parcel Map 04-13 for Ronald & Claudine Laffins�,Trustees, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit"A" and the following findings: A. The proposed map is consistent with the following But County General Plan Goals and Policies: 1.7.a. Encourage development in and around existing communities with public facilities. 1.7.b. Promote the full utilization of sites serp(ed by existing public facilities. 7.1.a. Consider fire hazards in all land se and zoning decisions, environmental review, subdivision rey the provision of public services. B. The design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with ����� County standards and po"cr s provided all conditions of project approval are found to be in coml plane C. The project is1physically suitable for the use and density of the proposed development because_the project site is level, does not contain any drainages, and is not within a 100 yea flood. D. The design'-and improvements of the project will not cause public health or safety problerris,'because the project site does not contain any physical characteristics that.could ause health or safety concerns with the provided mitigations. L? The design and improvements of the project will not conflict with easements (,\acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the �pr"oposed subdivision provided the attached conditions are met. \Fy The project site is not located within an earthquake fault zone. G. The project would not have an impact to any aircraft operations because' the project site is located within Airport Compatibility Zone "D", which does not have any restrictions on land uses, and because no existing or proposed structures would extend more than 100 feet above ground level. H. Approval of this project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare provided the required conditions and mitigation measures are found to be in compliance. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ 0 October 13, 2005 0 Agenda Report- Laffins TPM 04-13 0 Page 7 of 15 0 r I. ' The project is consistent with the Commercial General Plan land use designation. J. The project site is located more than 300 feet from any agricultural use (including agricultural processing uses) and more than 300 feet from any Agricultural zoning district or Orchard and Field Crops designated parcels. K. The project is not expected to generate any additional vehicular traffic because the project site is already developed with two commercial uses and no additional commercial uses would be allowed on the project site. k:\planning\projects\tpm\laffins.04-13\laffins tpm 04=13 pc agenda report.doc c • —}c, J� ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ October 13, 2005 ■ Agenda Report- Laffins TPM 04-13 ■ Page 8 of 15 ■ I EXHIBIT A Tentative Parcel Map for Ronald & Claudine Laffins, Trustees on APN 006-230-047, File # TPM 04-13: An application for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet. I. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Planning Division 1. Mitigation Measure# 1: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concul-ret2fivywith the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated pb',yhe development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining du' n the s�ite. Follow the dust control measures listed below: ' a. Water shall be applied by means of trucks hosesiand/or sprinklers as needed prior to any land clearing or earth movement to minimize dust emissions. b. Haul vehicles transporting soil into orout of the property shall be covered. c. A water truck shall be on site at all times. Water shall be applied to disturbed areas a minimum of two (2) times pend y, r more as necessary. d. On-site vehicles shall be limit d to a s eed of 15 mph on unpaved roads. e. Post a publicly visible sign�wt igle telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints his person shall respond and take corrective action within 24 hours�The, hone number of the Butte. County Air Quality Management Diftrict shall''be visible to ensure compliance with BCAQMD Rule 200 & 205 (Nuis`ance and Fugitive Dust Emissions). f. All visibly dry dig turbed soil surface areas of operation shall be watered to minimize�ilust emissions. g. Existing�road's,.and street adjacent to the project shall be cleaned at lease once per day uhless,conditions warrant a greater frequency." Plan Requirements: The note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be u "q y ,,recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet. This note shall also bepla >on all building and site development plans. ,,Tz to ing: Requirements of the condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and 1>1 construction periods. Monitoring: The Department of Development Services and the Public Works Department shall ensure that this note is placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet. Department of Development Services shall ensure that this note is placed on all building plans. Building ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ October 13, 2005 ■ Agenda Report- Laffins TPM 04-13 ■ Page 9 of 15 ■ inspectors shall spot check and shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Quality Management District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. 2. Mitigation Measure # 2: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Should development activities reveal the presence of cultural resources (i.e., artifact concentrations, including arrowheads and other stone tools or chipping debris, cans, glass, etc.; structural remains; human skeletal remains), work within 50 feet of the find shall cease immediately until\Aqu1alfied professional archaeologist can be consulted to evaluate the remains and implement appropriate mitigation procedures. Recommencement of development activities shall not occur until clearance is provided by the Butte County Department of-Development Services. Should human skeletal remains be encountered, State elaw req�,u res immediate notification of the County Coroner. Should the Countyoroner, �Uetermme that such remains are in an archaeological context, the Native A,ericaii Heritage Commission in Sacramento shall be notified immediately, pursuant to State law;;�to arrange for Native American participation in determining the disposition,f suchremains." This mitigation measure shall apply to all off-site construction activity�associated with the installation of a sewer line. Plan Requirements: This note shall be placedyon-a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an�additional map sheet and shall be shown on all building and site development plans Timing: This measure shall be i p mentle d during all site development activities. 1� Monitoring: Should cultural resources be discovered, the landowner/developer shall notify the Planning Division and a professional archaeologist. The Planning Division shall coordinate with the-developer and appropriate authorities to avoid damage to P-' cultural resources andel determine appropriate action. 3. Place a note o,a sep crate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional '.'-p sheet that states: "A development impact fee for Sheriffs facilities shall be^pid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article H of the Butte County Code, -priory to issuance of building permits. The fee amount will be determined and calculated as of thydate of application for the building permit." 4. \Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "A development impact fee for school facilities shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. The fee amount would be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permits." 5. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, pay any outstanding project-related processing fees. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ October 13, 2005 0 Agenda Report- Laffins TPM 04-13 0 Page 10 of 15 ■ Land Development Division 6. Prior to, or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, provide a fully executed road maintenance agreement on the County approved form. 7. Obtain encroachment permit for all new or existing driveway approaches and construct them to County standards, as specified in County Improvement Standards. 8. All access rights shall be reserved by deed, per County Ordinance, d� and depicted on the Parcel Map. 9. Pay the recording fees then in effect for recording the Parcelaps and related documents. 10. Relinquish abutters rights to Butte County, along the Esplanade frontage of Parcel 1, except at approved access point. 11 Show on the additional map sheet of the Parcel Map a 20-foot building setback from the right of way line of access road and a 25-foo building setback line from the right-of-way J line of Esplanade. 12. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map a an for a permanent solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters,shall be detained on site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly main a-ned1drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peTflow runoff to said channel or facility. 13. Show all easements of Vrecor4ro#n the Parcel Map. .� 14. Prior to or conNcurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, pay in full any and all delinquent, ct and estimated taxes and assessments as specified in Article 8, of Chapter�4 oaf p:�i,�v-3sion 2 of Title 7, of the California Government Code commencing with Sectiop 6649 7 15. Prior t or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, pay all applicable assessments established by affected assessment districts, in full. Ci9NiVor 7-4-IZ-L j`/la DoT 1�01,e Fire Department ^v y `v7ys6y&7V7—r o,"L ��o/� /� /�CCoRa�4i✓CG� wiTif �/'/��ICA�� Sd/.�h c��_ �Qr��' 16. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Construction, installation or development of structures or facilities on the parcels/lots shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, (Public Resources Code 4290/4291), and all other applicable State and County codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of application for permits." ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ October 13, 2005 0 Agenda Report- Laffins TPM 04-13 0 Page 11 of 15 0 17. Prior to recordation of the Map or application for a building permit, the applicant shall pay the then current established fee for the West Chico Fire Station Fund. Environmental Health Division 18. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map provide a letter or other documentation from the City of Chico stating that they are willing and able to supply sewer service to0arcels 1 and 2. ,rte 19. Place a note on the additional map sheet that states "Development of Par Is 1 and 2 will require connection to a public sanitary sewer". 20. Prior to issuance of a building permit, under a permit issuedbyth`Environmental Health Division, properly abandon the septic tank and connect the-structur�eson Parcels 1 and 2 to public sewer. County Counsel 21. If this entire matter or any finding, action ol�or\,conditon of this matter is appealed to the Board of Supervisors, the applicant or any other developer/operator other than the applicant agrees to indemnify the Co ty� odMe from liability or loss related to the approval of this project and agrees��6 si n, an indemnification agreement in a form approved by County Counsel before,tth eBoarrd's appeal hearing. If the application is not appealed, this condition is deemed- eemed s�Atiy'sfied. II. NOTATION A. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior ts�chapproval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that 4 Afte modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental deVmmation as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to. be major or gmficant.in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ October 13, 2005 ■ Agenda Report- Laffins TPM 04-13 ■ Page 12 of 15 0 1 NE 04-G 1 vO Z CT c2 z1 148 � oso d� �Y' V T �f�pl'�J' c�,� T • 053 �� 54 CA � 6 05 0 a f G o o SW 3 fT 3 0 � 5 ELL- 3 yy dP ��p d ff-, t V �nY 0 54 0 5419 5400 0 072 • Z o � 04- R N�O41 =Z .1� A 018 54155 1 NE 04-H 1 inch equals 400 feet City of Chico 0 " SE 04-G Sewer System v Sep 02,2003 �. .. a ., ra i t } ty 1. � � r r , � � � ' 1 , ..,� v � A,/ 1 ,f` f I � � I � �� _ { a { � I � / � 7 �ti � + � � � `\*� . ` �. iwh r RAR 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO,CALIFORNIA 95973-5811 • TELEPHONE 530-895-1422 • FAX 530-895-1409 ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS CIVIL ENGINEERS To L.lie L' 01.1L1^+•/ Date Ma.y 2 2005 bep0.r-l-wt��-l- C,-F 7 Clain -- y Cather Dvive 0're V; `l e CA Project No. 0 3 I S 4- Attention: G y' ` V p� / o r n Subject _TPM t7 Q- � � l i'� 0yic IA E C1(x"a13%e La�'Cn TiMtrsfiees� We are sending the following: El Transparencies Prints BUTTE Descriptions Letters �� COUNTY o MAY 16'.2005 El Specifications � Calculations ry > DEVEL�PNIENT SERVICES Other V'id i ua T I.,;� til S•fivaly E . N•�, Remarkst Q"e,A 6y���i i Gc IeAt- i' l e-0. CQa 11 1 '��ld (2�� n W4!H4 L�`S P_ CILL-L cA O IN/� ayt a to b Y'o X i wt 0."t +4,A P -Fra wi P To 4 e �� T`OL-LA L4 9 4 C o L+.� L-rl 1 S--, ve, � e.o►n 0.kSd bP C.Oyda-C+eA bU GI/VIcLIl at royGIniGd@SbGAlOb0.f'e&--p ROLLS, ANDERSON & ROLLS m �J BY Kellvl�th Cq• Skill E PE)PLS r °' S�JIA�IIS �t�rntao'i�n�a GoOZ c ! AVW luNnoi alufla J %3T 0 0 0 0 0 0 -_-��_ � -_-= 0 UN - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT BUTTE COUNTY INITIAL STUDY AND PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR TPM 04-13 (Ronald & Claudine Laffins, Trustees) Project Name: Ronald&Claudine sins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY FOR TPM 04-13 (Ronald & Claudine Laffins, Trustees) 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: Ronald&Claudine Laf ms,Trustees B. Engineer: RAR(Kenneth Skillman III) C. Staff Contact: Stephen Betts,Senior Planner(530)538-7153,sbetts@buttecounty.net D. Proiect Name: N/A E. Proiect Location: On the east side of Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, at 2862 Esplanade,Chico F. Type of Application(s): Tentative Parcel Map G. Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 006-230-047 H. Proiect Site Size: 0.80 acres(34,939 square feet) I. Current Zoning: C-2(General Commercial) J. General Plan Designation: Commercial K Environmental Setting:. Proposed Parcel 1 is developed with an automobile repair business("Superior Auto") and proposed Parcel 2 is developed with a swimming pool business ("Blue Haven Pools"). The project site is almost completely covered with structures or pavement. Two septic systems are installed on the site,and a sewer lateral extends from the septic system on the eastern portion of the site to Esplanade,where it is stubbed out. The site is level and does not contain any native vegetation. Non-native landscaping is located on the Esplanade frontage and an almond tree is located behind the Blue Haven Pools building. The project site does not contain any drainages, including creeks, swales,'or wetlands. Several storm water drainage inlets are located on the project site, which drain into the City of Chico's drainage system. The frontage of the project site is improved with curb,gutter,and sidewalk. The project site is served by public water(California Water Service Company). A fire hydrant is located on the east side of Esplanade,approximately 100 feet north of the project site. Sewer and storm water drainage lines are located along Esplanade. The site is not located within a 100-year flood zone. The project site is located approximately 1.9 miles from the main runway at the Chico Municipal Airport and is located within Airport Compatibility Zone"D"of the Chico Municipal Airport. The project site is not listed on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List (Cortese List) and is not near any listed sites or sites known or suspected to contain hazardous materials. The site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and has a General Plan designation of Commercial. Surrounding parcels are zoned C-2, A-R(Agricultural Residential), or are within the City of Chico. The site is located in a primarily commercial area,although urban residential uses are located to the east and south of the site. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffrns TPM 04-13 ■Page 1 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine Laftins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 The site is located within the City of Chico's Sphere of Influence and has been prezoned C-C (Community Commercial) by the city. The City's General Plan shows that the project site is designated as Community Commercial. L. Surrounding Land Uses: Direction General Plan Designation Zoning Existing Land Use(s) North Commercial C-2 Commercial(mini-storage business) South City of Chico City of Chico Two dwellings East High Density Residential A-R Residential West City of Chico City of Chico Commercial M. Project Description: This is an application for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet. The proposed parcels are, and would continue to be,utilized for commercial uses. Sewage disposal is proposed to be handled by existing on- site septic systems and domestic water supply would be provided by the California Water Service Company. (note: a condition of this project requires that the project site connect to the City of Chico's sanitary sewer system. Connection to the City's sewer system would require extending the existing sewer line on Esplanade approximately 135 feet to the project site.) Proposed Parcel 1 would front on Esplanade, and proposed Parcel 2 would have access to Esplanade via a proposed 22-foot wide road easement across Parcel 1. N. Public Agency Approvals: Butte County Environmental Health Division, Butte County Public Works Department,Butte County Fire Department/CDF,City of Chico. 2.0 DETERNUNATION [ ] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [X] I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [ ] I find that the proposed project COULD have. a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. [ ] I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or"potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed uppoon,the pprroposedproject,nothing further is required. o �>. D giRevdtbey y: Stephen Betts, Senior Planner Date 11 9 Z � : Joe Baker,Planning Manager Date ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 2 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine Laffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 3.0 POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS CHECKLIST SETTING A. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [ ] 4.1 Aesthetics [ ] 4.2 Agriculture Resources [X] 4.3 Air Quality [ ] 4.4 Biological Resources [X] 4.5 Cultural Resources [ ] 4.6 Geologic Processes [ ] 4.7 Hazards/Hazardous Material [ ] 4.8 Hydrology/Water Quality [ ] 4.9 Land Use [ ] 4.10 Mineral Resources [ ]4.11 Noise [ ] 4.12 Housing [ ] 4.13 Public Services [ ]4.14 Recreation [ ] 4.15 Transportation/Traffic [ ] 4.16 Utilities/Service Systems [X]4.17 Mandatory Findings of Significance B. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact' answer.is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact' answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards, (e.g.,the project would not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on a project-specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level,indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact'is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made,an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how,they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses,". may be cross-referenced). 5) "Reviewed Under Previous Document." Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case,a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,"describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should,where appropriate,include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffms TPM 04-13 ■Page 3 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine Lattins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold,if any,used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any,to reduce the impact to less than significant. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 4.1 AESTHETICNISUAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b. Substantially damage scenic resources,including,but not limited to,trees,rock outcroppings,and historic buildings X within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or X quality of the site and its surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Impact Discussion: The project site is located on Esplanade,which is developed with numerous commercial uses. The project site consists of two commercial structures and parking areas, and the proposed project would not change this use. Additional commercial development on the proposed parcels is not anticipated because there is very little area remaining on either of the two proposed parcels that could be further developed. With the existing commercial uses found in the project area, no substantial conflicts with the established character or functioning of the surrounding community are anticipated. The site is not located along a State or County designated scenic highway. This project would not affect a scenic vista nor have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. The project may require the installation of approximately 135 feet of sewer pipe within the Esplanade right-of-way. Construction activities association with installation of the sewer pipe would cause short-term visual impacts. Construction activities create a visual impact, and construction debris, rubbish and trash can accumulate on construction sites and are unsightly if visible from public streets. The completion of the sewer pipe installation would eliminate the short-term visual impacts of the construction operations. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.2 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffms TPM 04-13 ■Page 4 of 27 ■ Project Name:'Ronald&Claudine Laffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance(Farmland),as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and X Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or a X Williamson Act Contract? c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature,could result in conversion X of Farmland,to non-agricultural use? Impact Discussion: The C-2 zoning of the project site does not permit agricultural uses. The General Plan land use designation of Commercial does not list agricultural uses as either a Primary or a Secondary Use. The provisions of the Agricultural Element of the Butte County General Plan do not apply to parcels that have a Commercial General Plan land use designation. The soils on the site have a Soil Conservation Service Classification of II (Butte County GIS soils coverage), which are considered prime agricultural soils. The project site is not currently utilized for any type of agricultural use, although one almond tree is located behind the Blue Haven Pools building. No agricultural uses are located within 300 feet of the project site. The project site is not subject to a California Land Conservation Agreement ("Williamson Act"). None of the surrounding or nearby parcels are subject to a California Land Conservation Agreement. The project would not convert agricultural lands to non-agricultural uses and would not have an impact to any agricultural uses. The Butte County Agricultural Commissioner's Office commented that this project would not have an impact to agricultural operations. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.3 AIR QUALITY: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable X air qualityplan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially X to an existing or projected air quality violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air X quality standard(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 5 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine Lattins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X of people? Impact Discussion: Both the California Air Resources Board and the Environmental Protection Agency have established air pollution standards in an effort to protect human health and welfare. Geographic areas are designated "attainment' if these standards are met and "nonattainment' if they are not met. In addition, each agency has several levels of classifications based on severity of the problem. Butte County and all northern Sacramento Valley Air Districts have been designated as "moderate" nonattaihment areas for the state standards for ozone (03) and fine particulate matter (PM10). Currently,Butte County is in attainment for all the federal(less stringent)air quality standards. The project site is almost fully developed and no additional commercial uses are expected to be placed on the property. The number of vehicle trips generated by the existing uses would not increase due to this tentative parcel map project. Because the project site is already developed, and no additional commercial uses are anticipated to be placed on either of the proposed parcels, there would not be an increase in vehicle emissions generated by increased vehicular traffic. Emissions from vehicles and construction equipment associated with installation of a sewer pipe from the project site to a point approximately 135 feet south of the project site are not expected to create any significant air quality impacts due to the limited amount of construction activity needed to install the sewer pipe. The existing commercial uses on the project do not appear to cause any significant air quality impacts. The automobile repair business may generate emissions when running vehicles,and odors from oil,grease,or gasoline may occasionally be detected outside of the business. The swimming pool business could occasionally generate odors from swimming pool-related chemicals, such as chlorine. No additional commercial businesses are expected to be placed on the proposed parcels due to the parcels small size and the area needed for off-street parking. Commercial business on the project site may be required to obtain Authority to Construct and Permit to Operate permits from the Butte County Air Quality Management District. The District reviews these applications to determine if expected air emissions from a business meet all air quality regulations. The District establishes the standards by which the equipment must be operated and is reviewed annually.The equipment is inspected periodically by District staff. The project is not expected to generate any fugitive dust emissions because the project site is already developed and is almost completely covered with structures or pavement. No additional buildings are expected to be placed on the project site. However, demolition of one or both of the existing structures and the construction of new buildings may create fugitive dust emission during site development activities; such as grading, excavation for foundations and utilities, and other soil work. Additional fugitive dust emissions could be generated during installation of the off-site sewer pipe. The Butte County Air Quality Management District recommends incorporating measures to control fugitive dust emission for all road and other construction activities during project development,using such methods as site and driveway watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. Mitigation Measure # 1 is recommended that requires a note be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states dust control measures shall be taken during site development activities. Mitigation Measure # 1 applies to all construction activities associated with installation of a sewer pipe within the Esplanade right-of-way. Mitigation Measure#1: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. Water shall be applied by means of truck(s),hoses, and/or sprinklers as needed prior to any land clearing or earth movement to minimize dust emissions. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 6 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine Laffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 b. Haul vehicles transporting soil into or out of the property shall be covered. c. A water truck shall be on site at all times. Water shall be applied to disturbed areas a minimum of two (2) times per day or more as necessary. d. On-site vehicles shall be limited to a speed of 15 mph on unpaved roads. e. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 24 hours. The telephone number of the Butte County Air Quality Management District shall be visible to ensure compliance with BCAQMD Rule 200 & 205 (Nuisance and Fugitive Dust Emissions). f. All visibly dry disturbed soil surface areas of operation shall be watered to minimize dust emissions. g. Existing roads and street adjacent to the project shall be cleaned at lease once per day unless conditions warrant a greater frequency. Plan Requirements: The note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet. This note shall also be placed on all building and site development plans. Timing: Requirements of the condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction periodi. Monitoring: The Planning Division and the Public Works Departmentshall ensure that the note is placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet. Department of Development Services shall ensure that this note is placed on all building plans. Building inspectors shall spot check and shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Quality Management District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or through habitat modifications,on any species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or X regional plans,policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies,regulations or by the California X Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 or the Clean Water Act (including,but not limited to,marsh,vernal pool,coastal, X etc.)through direct removal,filling,hydrological interruption,or other means)? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish and wildlife species or with X established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy X ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat X ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 7 of 27 ■ J Project Name: Ronald&Claudine LaWns,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local,regional,or state habitat conservationplan? g. A reduction in the numbers,a restriction in the range,or an impact to the critical habitat of any unique,rare,threatened, X or endangered species of animals? h. A reduction in the diversity or numbers of animals onsite (including mammals,birds,reptiles,amphibians,fish or X invertebrates)? i. A deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat(for X foraging,breeding,roosting,nesting,etc.)? j. Introduction of barriers to movement of any resident or X migratory fish or wildlife species? k. Introduction of any factors(light,fencing,noise,human presence and/or domestic animals)which could hinder the X normal activities of wildlife? Impact Discussion: The project site is almost entirely covered with structures or paved surfaces and no native vegetation exists on the site. A small area along the Esplanade frontage of the site is landscaped with non-native vegetation. One almond tree is 'located behind the Blue Haven Pools structure. The project site does not contain any drainages, including creeks, swales, or wetlands. No heritage oaks exist on the site. The project site is located in an urban area that is developed with commercial and residential uses. A sewer line would need to be installed along the Esplanade right-of-way from the project site to a point approximately 135 feet to the south. No trees,other vegetation, drainages,or wetlands would be disturbed due to installation of the sewer line. The California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB Rarefind 2, Government Version, Jan-02-2003) was reviewed to determine if any special status species or habitats occur on the project site or in the project area. The CNDDB showed no occurrences of any special status species or habitats on the project site or in the immediate project area(0.5 mile radius). This project does not have the potential to have a significant impact to fish or wildlife habitat. The collection of Department of Fish and Game fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR 753.5 is not required. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X a historical resource as defrted in§15064.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an X archaeological resource pursuantto§15064.5? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X resource or site or unique geologic feature? ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 8 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine Laffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Signiricant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated d. Disturb any human remains,including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Impact Discussion: Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic period archaeological sites; historical features, such as rock walls, water ditches and flumes, and cemeteries; and architectural features. Cultural resources consist of any human-made site, object(i.e., artifact), or feature that defines and illuminates our past. Often such sites are found in foothill areas, areas with high bluffs, rock outcroppings, areas overlooking deer migratory corridors, or near bodies of water. The project site does not contain any of these characteristics. According to Butte County constraints mapping,the project site is located in an area considered to have a low to moderate archeological sensitivity. The two commercial structures on the project site are of a recent construction and are not considered historic structures and are not associated with anyone of historical importance. The project is not expected to uncover any cultural resources because the site is almost completely developed and it would be very difficult to place any additional commercial uses on the site. However, future development on the project site (i.e., replacement of the existing structures) may uncover and disturb cultural resources that lie below the surface of the ground. To protect cultural resources that may be found on the project Mitigation Measure # 2 is recommended that requires all development activity on the site halt and the County and a qualified archaeologist be notified in the event any cultural resources are encountered during the course of development activities. The project may require the installation of a sewer line from the project site-to a point approximately 135 feet south of the project site. Construction activity associated with the installation of the sewer pipe could uncover and disturb cultural resources. Mitigation Measure#2 is applicable to any construction activity associated with the installation of the sewer pipe. Mitillation Measure#2: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Should development activities reveal the presence of cultural resources (i.e., artifact concentrations, including arrowheads and other stone tools or chipping debris, cans, glass, etc.; structural remains; human skeletal remains), work within 50 feet of the find shall cease immediately until a qualified professional archaeologist can be consulted to evaluate the remains and implement appropriate mitigation procedures. Recommencement of development activities shall not occur until clearance is provided by the Butte County Department of Development Services. Should human skeletal remains be encountered, State law requires immediate notification of the County Coroner. Should the County Coroner determine that such remains are in an archaeological context, the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento shall be notified immediately, pursuant to State law, to arrange for Native American participation in determining the disposition of such remains." This mitigation measure shall apply to all off-site construction activity associated with the installation of a sewer line. Plan Requirements: This note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet and shall be shown on all building and site development plans. Timing: This measure shall be implemented during all site development activities. Monitoring: Should cultural resources be discovered, the landowner and/or the developer shall notify the Planning Division and a professional archaeologist. The Planning Division shall coordinate with the developer and appropriate authorities to avoid damage to cultural'resources and determine appropriate action. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 9 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine Laums,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 4.6 GEOLOGIC PROCESSES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving: 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault X Zoning Map issued by.the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? X 3. Seismic-related ground failure,including liquefaction? X 4. Landslides? X b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,or that would become unstable as a result of the project,and X potentially result in on-or off-site landslide,lateral spreading,subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil,as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(1994);creating substantial X risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system X where sewers are not available for the disposal or waste water? Impact Discussion: The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake fault zone and is not within an after shock epicenter region (Butte County GIS Epicenter Regions theme). No known earthquake faults are located within five miles of the project site. The only known active fault in Butte County is the Cleveland Hill fault zone, located approximately 24 miles to the southeast of the project site, where activity on August 1, 1975 resulted in the Oroville earthquake. This earthquake had a Richter magnitude of 5.7 and resulted in approximately 2.2 miles of ground rupture along the western flank of Cleveland Hill. In the northwest comer of Butte County near Chico there are a series of short, north-northwest trending faults similar to the Cleveland Hill fault. These faults appear to be an extension of the Bear Mountain Fault or Foothills Shear Zone. Minor seismic activity has occurred in the area of these short faults;however,other geologic evidence indicates these faults are not active(Butte County General Plan 1977). i The 80-mile-long Midland-Sweitzer fault is located approximately 40 miles south-southwest of Butte County. This fault is considered active and has caused historic earthquakes of Richter magnitudes between 6 to 6.9 in the area in 1892. There is some speculation as to the exact location of the historic earthquake epicenters and some question if they actually occurred on the Midland-Sweitzer fault(Butte County, 1977). Approximately five miles west of Butte County there is a north trending fault system known as the Willows fault. This fault is approximately 40 miles long and displaces Cretaceous sediment in the Sacramento Valley. It does not appear to displace surface sediment and has been mapped principally by geophysical methods. However, there have been enough historical seismic events in the vicinity of this fault to conclude that it should be considered potentially active(Butte County General Plan 1977). ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 10 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine Laffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 A moderate earthquake occurred on the afternoon of Friday, August 10, 2001, centered about nine miles west of Portola, California, and about 65 miles east of the project site. Very little damage occurred as a result of this earthquake, which was had a magnitude of 5.5, but brief groundshaking was felt in Chico during the earthquake and the aftershocks. This earthquake occurred in the Mohawk Valley Fault Zone,and this area of.California experiences a magnitude five or higher earthquake approximately every 20 years,according to the University of California,Berkeley Seismological Laboratory. Historical events in the area include the following: Table 1 Historical Seismic Events near Recent Portola Event Near Portola—Mohawk Valley Fault Zone Year Location Magnitude 1875 6.2 40 km to the NNE near Janesville 1888 6.2 20 km to the SSW near Blairsden 1959 1 5.6 1 40 km to the ESE near Verdi 1966 1 6.0 1 60 km to the SSE near Truckee Source: Adapted from information provided by the California Division of Mines and Geology and posted on the UC-Berkeley Seismological Laboratory web site(http://wiiiv.seismo.berkeley.edu/.seismo). Like most of central California,the site can be expected to be subjected to seismic ground shaking at some future time. Accordingly, all buildings and other improvements would be designed and installed in accordance with Uniform Building Code requirements. Because the project appears to be located such that the probability of significant groundshaking is low,because the project does not propose the addition of significant structures that would be at risk to seismic activity, and because any structures that are built during the course of the project would be designed and installed in accordance with Uniform Building Code standards for the appropriate Seismic Hazard Zone, potential geologic impacts would be less than significant. The two existing commercial buildings on the project site are of modern design and construction and were installed under permit and inspection from the Butte County Building Division. The Butte County Seismic Safety Element's Liquefaction Potential Map indicates that the site has a generally low potential for liquefaction. The impact would be less than significant. All new structures placed on the project site would comply with applicable portions of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by Butte County, which would mitigate any potential impacts resulting from any sort of ground failure. The Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that there is no potential for landslides in this area. There are no slopes on the project site or in the project area that would be at risk of sliding. The Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map also indicates that the property is located within an area of heavy groundwater withdrawal and is in a potential subsidence area. Although so designated, this designation is general in nature, and is applicable to virtually all of the Central Valley area of Butte County. Although subsidence is a problem in some areas of the Central Valley in California due to groundwater withdrawals for irrigation, there have not been any documented incidents that indicate a specific problem at this location. No impact is anticipated. There is no potential for soil erosion on the project site (Butte County General Plan GIS data). The project site has a slope of less than 1%. No soil disturbance,such as grading,which has the potential to create soil erosion,is expected to occur on the project site because the project site is already developed with two commercial and there is no area remaining for additional businesses. The soil on the site—Vina loam—is not highly susceptible to soil erosion (Soil Survey of the Chico Area,U.S.Department of Agricultural, 1925). No soil erosion is expected to occur on the project site because no soil disturbance activities would be required. The project site requires connection to the City of Chico's sanitary sewer system, which would require the installation of a sewer line on Esplanade approximately 135 feet to the south of the site to connect with the existing sewer line. Construction activity associated with the installation of the sewer pipe would be minimal due to the short distance and no significant soil erosion impacts are anticipated. Construction activity would occur within the Esplanade right-of- way. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ m Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 11 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine Larnns,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 All wastewater generated by the existing commercial uses on the project site is disposed of on-site by two septic systems,one on each of the proposed parcels. Both septic systems were placed on the site under permit and.inspection by the Butte County Environmental Health Division. The Butte County Environmental Health Division states that the project does not meet the on-site sewage disposal area requirements of the Chico Nitrate Action Plan. A provision in Chapter 19 of the Butte County Code allows the Environmental Health Division the discretion to require a parcel being subdivided to connect to a public sewer system. Butte County Code Section 19-14(c)states the following: When a proposed subdivision is located within a reasonable distance of an existing public sanitary sewer system and it is practicable and feasible for the subdivision to be connected to and be served by the same, the health officer may require that the subdivision be provided with an adequate system of sewer lines and that the system of sewer lines be connected to the aforementioned public sanitary sewer system. As used in this section, the word "subdivision"shall have the same meaning as in chapter 20, relating to subdivisions. A City of Chico sewer line is located on Esplanade, approximately 135 feet to the south of the project site. A condition of project approval requires that the project site connect to the City of Chico's sanitary sewer system. Another condition requires that the existing septic systems be abandoned. By connecting the proposed parcels to the sanitary sewer system and abandoning the existing septic systems, the project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The Conservation Element's Expansive Soils Map indicates that the project site has a low expansive soil potential. The Butte County Building Division may require soil tests prior to issuance of a building permit to determine if the soils on the site have an expansive potential. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environmental through the routine transport use,or disposal X of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident X conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,substances,or waste within one- X quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code X Section 65962.5 and,as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project X result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffms TPM 04-13 ■Page 12 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine Laffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or X working in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation X plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,including where X wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with willdlands? Impact Discussion: The project site is not listed on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List (Cortese List) and is not near any listed sites or sites known or suspected to contain hazardous materials. The two existing commercial uses on the project site may store and utilize materials, such as oil, gasoline, cleaning chemicals, and chlorine. However, the amounts of these materials kept on the project site are minimal and would not expose people to any hazardous materials. The project does not involve the use of hazardous materials and would not create any hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. The project site is located approximately 1.9 miles from the main runway at the Chico Municipal Airport. The project site is located with Airport Compatibility Zone "D" of the Chico Municipal Airport (2000 Butte County Airport Compatibility Plan). There are no restrictions on land uses within Compatibility Zone D (other than the height of structures, which is no more than 100 feet above ground level) and the project would not have an impact on aircraft operations. The project site is not located near any private airstrip. None of the existing structures on the project site extend into the protected airspace of the Chico Municipal Airport. The project would not interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact would occur. The project site is not located within the State Responsibility Area(SRA) for wildland fires. A fire hydrant is located on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 100 feet north of the project site. The nearest staffed Butte County fire station is Station # 44 (North Chico), which is located approximately 1.8 miles to the east of the site on Cohasset Road. The project would not expose people or structures to wildland fires. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffms TPM 04-13 ■Page 13 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine L...s,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g.,the production rate of X preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which ermits have been granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a X stream or river,in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount X of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage X systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade waterquality? X g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood X Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which X would iinpede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, ury,or death involving flooding,including flooding as a X result of the failure of a levee or dam? U. Inundation by seiche,tsunami,or mudflow? X Impact Discussion: Domestic water supply for the two existing commercial businesses on the project site is provided by the California Water Service Company. This water provider has adequate supplies of water to continue to provide water service to the project site. No significant impacts to groundwater supplies are expected to occur. The project site is fully developed and no additional development activity would occur. A General Activities Construction Storm Water Permit is not required to be obtained from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board because no additional development is expected to occur on the project site and because the project site is less than an acre in size. A significant increase in stormwater runoff is not expected due to this project. The project site is currently developed with two commercial structures, asphalt driveway/parking areas, and other hardscape, which covers almost all the entire project site with impervious surfaces. The Butte County Public Works Department requires that the applicant submit a plan for a permanent solution for drainage. The plan would specify how drainage waters would be detained on-site and/or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility. The plan is also required to show that there will be no increase in the peak flow of storm water runoff from the site. The project site currently drains into existing on-site storm water drainage inlets that connect to the City of Chico's storm drainage system. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 14 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claud ineTfns Trustees Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13• The project site is not within a floodway or a 100-year flood zone(Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map 06007C-0340C, dated June 8, 1998). Therefore, no people or structures on the site would be subject to flooding. The property is not located in an area prone to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact would occur with respect to these natural hazards. Mitit?ation Measure: None required. 4.9 LAND USE: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Physically divide an established community? X b. Conflict with an applicable land use plan,policy,or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including,but not limited to,the general plan,specific plan, X local coastal program,or zoning ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X natural community conservation plan? Impact Discussion: The proposal would divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet. The C-2 zone does not have a minimum parcel size;lot area is determined by the size of the building,off- street parking area, and area required for an on-site sewage disposal system(Butte County Code Section 24-175(e)(1)). The Commercial General Plan land use designation likewise does not specify a minimum parcel size. The project is .consistent with the C-2 zoning of the site and with the Commercial General Plan land use designation. The project is located within the City of Chico's Sphere of Influence and is in the Chico Urban Area. The project site abuts parcels that are within the City of Chico. The project site is prezoned CC(Community Commercial)by the city. The City's General Plan shows the project site is designated as Community Commercial. The existing commercial uses on the project site do not appear to be consistent with the- City's CC prezoning of the site,which generally allows less intense commercial uses than the County's C-2 zone does. The project site is located in an"island"of county land that is surrounded by the City of Chico, and the parcels on the west side of Esplanade, across from the project site, are within the City of Chico. A request for comments concerning this project was sent to the City of Chico. The City had the following comments: 1. The project should connect to the City's sanitary sewer system since the sewer main is located nearby. 2. Annexation into the City of Chico will be required in order to connect to the sanitary sewer system. . 3. Development on Parcel 2 should incorporate a 50%shading of parking lot areas. The Butte County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) commented on this project and recommends that the project parcel annex into the City of Chico in order to provide public sewage and storm water drainage services. This proposal would not physically divide an established community due to its conformity with zoning and surrounding land use. The property is not within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 15 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine..........s,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 4.10 MINERAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the X residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general X plan,specific plan,or other land use plan? Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not use or extract any mineral or energy resources and would not restrict access to known mineral resource areas. The project is located within an area where there are little or no mineral resources currently being extracted. Therefore,the project would have no impact on mineral resources. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.11 NOISE: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or X noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground X bome vibration or ground bome noise levels? c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the X project? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing X without theproject? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project X expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in X the project area to excessive noise levels? Impact Discussion: The project site is located in a commercial area with elevated noise levels. Noise is generated by the adjacent and nearby commercial uses and from vehicular traffic on Esplanade. ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 16 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&ClaudineTaffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,file#TPM 04-13• The project is not expected to cause an increase in noise in the project area because the site is already fully developed with two commercial uses. The two existing commercial business on the site— an automobile repair business and a swimming pool business—are relatively quiet. The automobile repair business, which would create the most noise on the project site, is located on the west side of the project.site, away from the residential uses on the parcels to the east of the project site. The C-2 zoning district does not require any building setbacks from property lines unless the parcel abuts a residential zoning district,in which case a 10-foot building setback is required. The project site abuts an A-R zone to the east and the swimming pool business structure is set back 10 feet from this property line. The building setback from the A-R zone helps to prevent or reduce noise generated by the commercial business. Construction activities on the site, such as grading and building construction, would temporarily generate high noise levels on and adjacent to the project site intermittently during project development activities. As already noted, no construction activity is expected to occur on the project site because the site is already developed. Construction activity associated with installation of a sewer line from the project site to a point approximately 135 feet south of the site would generate some noise in the form of construction equipment and vehicles. No significant noise related impacts are anticipated during installation of the sewer line because of the limited amount of construction activity needed. The project site is located approximately 1.9 miles from the main runway at the Chico Municipal Airport. Arriving and departing aircraft occasionally overfly the project site. The noise from overflying aircraft is not significant and does not create excessive noise levels on the project site. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.12 HOUSING: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Induce substantial population growth in an area,either directly(for example,by proposing new homes and X businesses)or indirectly(for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing X elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people,necessitating the X construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Impact Discussion: The proposed Tentative Parcel Map would create two parcels (net increase of one parcel) for commercial uses. Therefore, the project would not affect the population of the area because the parcels would be utilized for commercial uses,not residential uses. The project would not displace individuals or housing. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 17 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine 1——s,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 4.13 PUBLIC SERVICES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which X could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times,or other performance objectives for any of the public services? b. Fire-protection?- X c. Police Protection? X d. Schools? X e. Parks? X f. Other public services? X Impact Discussion: The project site is not within the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection's State Responsibility Area (SRA). A pressurized community water system(California Water Service Company) exists in the project area and a fire hydrant is located on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 100 feet north of the project site. The Butte County Fire Department/California Department of Forestry requires that a pressurized community water system for fire protection serve the project site. The Butte County Fire Department/CDF will determine the need for a fire hydrant at the project site. The proposal is not expected to result in an increase in demand for police protection services because the project site is fully developed. Sheriff impact fees, as required by Butte County Code, were required to be collected at the time of building permit issuance for the two commercial structures on the project site. The parcels being created would be utilized for commercial uses. Therefore, the project would not have an impact to schools. School impacts fees were required to be collected at the time of issuance of a building permit for the two commercial uses on the project site. Both of the proposed parcels are required to connect to the City of Chico's sanitary sewer system. The additional sewage from the project site flowing into the City's sewage treatment plant is not expected to create any significant impacts to the sewage treatment plant nor require the expansion of the sewage treatment plant. The City of Chico is currently in the process of preparing an Environmental Impact Report for future expansion of the City's sewage treatment facility. The project would require the installation of a sewer pipe from the project site to a point approximately 135 feet south of the site. The cost of the installation of this sewer pipe would be bome by the applicant. Installation of the sewer pipe would not cause any significant environmental impacts because all work would be within the Esplanade right-of-way,which does not contain any vegetation or wetlands. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffrns TPM 04-13 ■Page 18 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine affins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13• 4.14 RECREATION: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial X physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an X adverse physical effect on the environment? Impact Discussion: The project's contribution of two new parcels for commercial uses would not cause an increase in the usage of parks and other recreational facilities in the Chico area. The project does not include any recreational facilities nor would the project require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. ' Mititration Measure:.None required. 4.15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e.,result in a substantial increase in either the number of X vehicle trips,the volume to capacity ratio on roads,or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed,either individually or cumulatively,a level of service standard established by the county congestion X management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns,including either an increase in"traffic levels or a change in location that results X in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or incompatible X uses e.g.,farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? X f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g. Conflict with accepted policies,plans or programs supporting alternative transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts, X bicycle racks)? Impact Discussion: Proposed Parcel 1 would front on Esplanade, which is a public road. Proposed Parcel 2 would have access to Esplanade via a proposed 22-foot wide road easement across Parcel 1. Esplanade at the project site consists of four travel lanes and a center turning lane. r ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 19 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine Lattins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 Esplanade is classified as a major arterial roadway and carries a high volume of vehicular traffic. Esplanade north of Lassen Avenue has a vehicle average daily total of 13,598 (Butte County Association of Government 2003 traffic counts). Traffic generally moves unimpeded on this section of Esplanade. The project would not result in any additional vehicle trips because the project site is already developed with two commercial businesses and additional commercial uses on the site would not be possible due to the small size of the proposed parcels. The Butte County Public Works Department did not identify any traffic impacts that may be caused by the project. Butte County Code Section 24-240 lists the parking requirements for commercial uses. At 6,000 square feet, the automotive repair business on proposed Parcel 1 would require 15 parking spaces (one space per 400 square feet of gross floor area). There are currently nine parking spaces next to the building, plus ten angled parking spaces on the south side of the parcel. These two parking areas will remain;although the angled parking spaces on the south side of this parcel would be within a 25-foot wide public utilities easement. The 4,840 square foot swimming pool business on proposed Parcel 2 would require twelve parking spaces (one space per 400 square feet of gross floor area). There are 15 parking spaces on this parcel. This Tentative Parcel Map project would not conflict with accepted policies,plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. This project would require that a sewer line be installed from the project site to a point approximately 135 feet to the south. Installation of this sewer pipe, which would occur within the Esplanade right-of-way, may cause minor disruptions to vehicular traffic on Esplanade. Due to the limited amount of construction needed to install the sewer line no significant impacts to vehicular circulation is expected. As mentioned above, access to proposed Parcel 2 from Esplanade would be via a proposed 22-foot wide easement across proposed Parcel 1. This proposed access does not meet the requirements for approved access to a public road. Butte County Code Section 20-134 (Minimum widths) requires a 60-foot wide access easement, although a 50-foot wide easement may be approved in some situations. The applicant can request an exception to this standard pursuant to Butte County Code Section 20-4(Exceptions to design requirements). Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing X facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the X construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources,or are X new or expanded entitlements needed? ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffms TPM 04-13 ■Page 20 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine ffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-]3 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has X adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to theprovider's existing commitments? L Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity X to accommodate theproject's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal,state,and local statutes,and regulations related to solid waste? X Impact Discussion: Sewage disposal for the existing commercial uses on the site is handled by two on-site septic systems. With the proposed land division, each parcel would not have sufficient sewage disposal area to meet the sewage disposal requirements of the Chico Nitrate Action Plan. The Butte County Environmental Health Division requires that the project site connect to the City of Chico's sanitary sewer system prior to recordation of the Final Map. The additional sewage flow from the project site into the City of Chico's sanitary sewer system is not expected to result in the need to expand the City's sewage treatment facility. The City of Chico is currently in the process of preparing an Environmental Impact Report for the future expansion of their sewage treatment plant. The project would not have an impact on any wastewater treatment facilities. A City of Chico's sanitary sewer line is located on Esplanade, but currently terminates at the parcel south of and adjacent to the project site (City of Chico Sewer System Map#NE 04-G, Sep 02, 2003). The sewer line would need to be extended up Esplanade to the project site, a distance of approximately 135 feet. The extension of the sewer line would not cause any significant environmental impacts since all work would take place within the Esplanade right-of- way,which does not contain any sensitive animal or plant habitat. Domestic water supply for the existing commercial uses on the site is obtained from a public water system(California Water Service Company). The project would not have a significant impact on any water treatment facilities. No off-site storm water drainage improvements appear to be necessary as a result of this project. Existing storm water drainage inlets on the project site drain into the City of Chico's drainage system. The project would not cause an increase the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill because the project site is fully developed. No impact would occur with respect to federal,state,and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffrns TPM 04-13 ■Page 21 of 27■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 4.17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (Section 15065): Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a X plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history orprehistory? b. Have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a X project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future rojects)? c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either X directly or indirectly? The project has the potential to contribute impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable with respect to Initial Study Checklist Items 4.3 —Air Quality and 4.5 —Cultural Resources. Cumulative impacts to these areas would be mitigated due to the inclusion of Mitigation Measures 1 through 2 as itemized under Section 5 — Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Requirements. 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: Mitigation Measure#1: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal,of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. Water shall be applied by means of truck(s),hoses, and/or sprinklers as needed prior to any land clearing or earth movement to minimize dust emissions. b. Haul vehicles transporting soil into or out of the property shall be covered. c. A water truck shall be on site at all times. Water shall be applied to disturbed areas a minimum of two (2) times per day or more as necessary. d. On-site vehicles shall be limited to a speed-of 15 mph on unpaved roads. e. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 24 hours. The telephone number of the Butte County Air Quality Management District shall be visible to ensure compliance with BCAQMD Rule 200 & 205 (Nuisance and Fugitive Dust Emissions). f. All visibly dry disturbed soil surface areas of operation shall be watered to minimize dust emissions. g. Existing roads and street adjacent to the project shall be cleaned at lease once per day unless conditions warrant a greater frequency. Plan Requirements: The note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet. This note shall also be placed on all building and site development plans. Timing: Requirements of the condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction periods. ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■ Initial.Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 22 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Clau dine affins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13• Monitoring: The Department of Development Services and the Public Works Department shall ensure that this note is placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet. Department of Development Services shall ensure that this note is placed on all building plans. Building inspectors shall spot check and shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Quality Management District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. Mitigation Measure#2: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Should development activities reveal the presence of cultural resources (i.e., artifact concentrations, including arrowheads and other stone tools or chipping debris, cans, glass, etc.; structural remains; human skeletal remains), work within 50 feet of the find shall cease immediately until a qualified professional archaeologist can be consulted to evaluate the remains and implement appropriate mitigation procedures. Recommencement of development activities shall not occur until clearance is provided by the Butte County Department of Development Services. Should human skeletal remains-be encountered, State law requires immediate notification of the County Coroner. Should the County Coroner determine that such remains are in an archaeological context, the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento shall be notified immediately, pursuant to State law, to arrange for Native American participation in determining the disposition of such remains." This mitigation measure shall apply to all off-site construction activity associated with the installation of a sewer line. Plan Requirements: This note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet and shall be shown on all building and site development plans. Timing: This measure shall be implemented during all site development activities. Monitoring: Should cultural resources be discovered,the landowner/developer shall notify the Planning Division and a professional archaeologist. The Planning Division shall coordinate with the developer and appropriate authorities to avoid damage to cultural resources and determine appropriate action. 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL: 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1,Seismic Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2,Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1,Safety Element. Oroville,CA CH2M Hill, 1977. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Man 111-3,Safety Element. Oroville,CA: C112M Hill, 1977.. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Man IV-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1,Scenic Highway Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4, Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville,CA: James P.Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Man. Oroville,CA. 11. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map,Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency,State of California, 1983. 12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map,established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville,CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Mans. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1998 and 2000. ■Butte County Department of Development Services si ■ Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 23 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine____...s,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 14. USGS Quad Maps. 15. Soil Map,Chico(1925)/Oroville(1926)Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 16. Soil Survey of Chico(1925)/Oroville(1926)Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 17. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. 18. California Natural Diversity Database(CNDDB)accessed through Rarefmd 2,Government Version,Jan-02- 2003. . 19. Butte County Association of Governments 2003 Traffic Counts. 7.0 CONSULTED AGENCIES: [X] Environmental Health [X] Public Works [X] Building Manager [ ] BCAG [ ] ALUC [X] LAFCo [X] Air Qual.Management Dist. [X] City of Chico [ ] City of Biggs [ ] City of Gridley [ ] City of Oroville [ ] Town of Paradise [X] CA Department of Forestry [X] CalTrans(Traffic) [X] Central Reg.Water Quality [ ] Department of Conservation [X] CA Dept.of Fish and Game [ ] Highway Patrol [ ] Army Corps of Engineers [ ] US Fish&Wldlife Service [X] Agricultural Commissioner [ ] Butte Co.Farm Bureau [ ] Oroville Union School Dist. [ ] Feather River Rec.Dist. [X] County Counsel [X] California Water Svc. Co. [ ] LOAPUD [X] PG&E [ ] Pacific Bell [ ] Oroville Union Sch.Dist. [ ] Oroville Elem.School Dist. [X] County Assessor [ ] Thermalito Union Sch.Dist. 8.0 PROJECT SPONSOR(S) INCORPORATION OF MITIGATION INTO PROPOSED PROJECT: I/We have reviewed the Initial Study for the Ronald& Claudine Laffins, Trustees, Tentative Parcel Map (APN# 006-230-047) application and particularly the mitigation measures identified herein. UWe hereby modify the application on file with the Butte County Planning Department to include and incorporate all mitigations set forth in this Initial Study. IZ05 Project Sponsor/P of ct Agent Date Project Sponsor/Project Agent Date k:\planning\projects\tpm\laffias.04-13\1affins tpm initial study.doc ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffms TPM 04-13 ■Page 24 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudine7affins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13• 81 IN \ \ IN icy IN ,\ 1 �\ `Sys'/ • ✓, � _�� ',\''4,\i \ );:7 �._ ♦`� j\\\ QJ i `i'v %/ /`\ •��'�// '.•'+ �\ =q� / `, moi:•, `` \ 'PPa. I i 9' ' i -. Vo> i\( \.'l ;. l`\, j : i. %�.�� '�#' ' \ '� ♦./ % � T `c `gyp,,/ + i ♦ '. ;\.:.___r l\. l /;+ :Qi;-;'"i♦ 1♦•�: ,Y/• \;. / @ l" .`'• \♦ Zi"•`a/ �''`;,G f'� ,Y I \ % rr '\5e \ '♦' `.l \1 '/ .i \' lid ,"IN ` p& �5rn V IL �. `V J\'8,��. ,� _�.,` � r>';�\� �� \ Y� \ \\`/ate]•/%1,�,' ' ��. '' V,1 , ,�. � ...� )`� •fes� _ �• NV `,♦/. \ � °/.i'\ ,f�•� y:x,.''�� ,�,^;�, /./ ..\` '\ ': >'\ \ ^.tet-\` ���5`f�.,��' / •.��,`' /��%`, �� �. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study—Laffms TPM 04-13 ■Page 25 of 27 ■ "i ' 3 tai YrrNIP �,. P r,t `;'�' � � y� e� #..,. J/ �q„•,�th� :yf�t+�,.�3K`i x .. n�� 'r'rc. a'�'E ..i• r`r� e'�, �, r� Si°` :1� e''; } K yf -Oa4 +"- i§j �r��,`*� ��° '.d r, ��y��.�' '�`�'�$'yt.�s"'P`. ,�? ��[" ,.�`"•✓/�~ �"x> "`Fti`�X HY��f�3 �+-L ��' „+r�`r'e' „ -y .a. ' ull '' t i $'�r 15 �� `'es. ® R� r� `'- ��}.zi�l ��•-{ t:4�. �i� N.� `� fo-e'f+r "� v „ss ��..+�`�� _th;�& �•�„ vn. 44 it'a �;`�P'i'`�i' �;sy' f r "s;"?+ X -', i h � ?f rXs pd7'3�p �_ � - gm- �'�s L 'h` NO fi ipi ytl 'r •!^ :l. .?!4 din' }Y,- Ell ,} 'i� yp1ny� fl -,�+ilT"y�`^g.sy y. ks } s9 r us rm to - }�•�t'�r 3p;'�' +-t3 ,1'G-S r�-:fit! atS � f��.0 Cn'`� �T !'�}�{� r L 'A� !. -TL�'. f•y i � �t � � r ..r r1ysMMA r..+ �,.rr Aw r �.,g�'`'f`�.,,P sy#� �at f 2, ,y tS' yS�°w Edi_#�'Ft', ._ "' �i 7r s 1'>�r'• v. �.. niT�p17 t�,.r....,km. .-u.,.z v;...,'Sr..a�r�f?"¢-.a�a,;� .r�?kr�rm�fi..�:-r ., -aB7�.':. - ,:_ .l ._-..�Y ,r�u'4�..�.y.':. k 3 1:,.u£,'�,■ Project Name: Ronald&ClaudinOffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13 ESMERALDA TRACT 06 MAPS 23 8c 38 9�F 301 A.P.006-230-046 A.P.006-230-045 8 Im.DI S 5718'40 E 120.0' ,aaee 1e,.m a,:o Is•wNrtc o m,.a a••woD rDu ,>o�, in 36. .lm.za S'P.U.E e ' ,. rl9a7..oa.r, •r)s.w .,•••au .'nae .,r9ae . . S ° PROPOSED BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION ;i • __ .1)9.)3 , 5179,ea - OZ °" r 0 0 1 ai ^- �1 ^ lel __�-•__�_�_�-_tel ```` •��/ � PROPOSED LEAC-UNDERH O u JSTRUCTION ` r FI wHsr D -- E---------- ----- ```� s •Ila.b �1r9.59 1 g{ ^ Ci \`•,,PROfgSED SDp I I I I PARCEL 2 'nm 18.025.5 SF A.P.006-380-016 "�" PROPOSED,STORM ; A.P.006-230-048 li9_Tr I79.rz DRAIN ry �.�_ 53718'40'E - Uap) 9 . i79ce 120.0' Eur Nc cars is o.�eur L . k•A, $ li"15 ,)1.93 114.0.1 I i 79.1 rr I E7t•P=ru't - 88 5. i 1 17x.93 I I ; I 1 ' 1 W , 1 I 1 A 4200 FOOT NIDE INGRESS AND . .� I ASPM9• 9•,cv r� 1 C POP ARCELIX 2 TO BARES THE ' I SeNETIT IN OMS. L r N C; I I I I Z eI PARCEL 1 • I H ISI 16,913 7I SF I M I PROPOSED SEW" EbSTINC BUILDING 7 (SUPERIOR AUTO) vii" i' 'M27 1 � A 15.00 F00T NtOC MON-OCCLUSIVE A 5.0 FOOT WOE I I _ t I 11' EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES 11 AND STORM DRAINAGE rAaunES FON PUBLIC TI EASEMENT I ASPN�r Pe,t?rprl I� FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 2 FOR PUBLIC UIRJTIES I I PARCEL THE 4B FIT OP I I In TO 8E RESERVED IN DEEDS J IF RESERii D IN OETDS I GRw,(r!,7A e'or�{v7an e I I ' I ss•P.U.E , � I COSANO x0.00 FOOT ,n.•r ,Tee/ I,n.e• NDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT 60___--------1 n.n� r ir9.» �•4D11 ' 5'u' �SCAK 1 I rasPiC ,\ ,Te.>7 N 37-18.40- W I ' 11x36 120.0' ;Tlal -------------- ------- �L____.3Z2,IY .a ,raD] DDssftC 1 CJT1E11 UA AO(b]uf x0.10 19Aa T ic-n1w 019-sTA`T.•,MOD --------------------1.x.1-Y�� L.i,7e.az L7au--------------'------------ -"----i7an • ilarD��- PROJECT BENCH MARK CHISEDED SQUARE IN TOP OF CURB ESPLANADE (PUBLIC) DAA now-179.11 CITY Of axo DAIUY. ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 27 of 27■ f �VTrFo 0 O 0 0 0 cou N'�y .. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT BUTTE COUNTY INITIAL STUDY AND PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR TPM 04-13 (Ronald & Claudine Laffins, Trustees) ` Project Name: Ronald&Claudeffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-130 COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY FOR TPM 04-13 (Ronald & Claudine Laffins, Trustees) 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: Ronald&Claudine Laffins,Trustees B. Engineer: RAR(Kenneth Skillman III) C. Staff Contact: Stephen Betts,Senior Planner(530)538-7153,sbetts@buttecounty.net D. Proiect Name: N/A E. Proiect Location: On the east side of Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, at 2862 Esplanade,Chico F. Twe of ApOication(s): Tentative Parcel Map G. Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 006-230-047 H. Proiect Site Size: 0.80 acres(34,939 square feet) I. Current Zoning: C-2(General Commercial) J. General Plan Designation: Commercial K. Environmental Setting: Proposed Parcel 1 is developed with an automobile repair business ("Superior Auto") and proposed Parcel 2 is developed with a swimming pool business ("Blue Haven Pools"). The project site is almost completely covered with structures or pavement. Two septic systems are installed on the site,and a sewer lateral extends from the septic system on the eastern portion of the site to Esplanade,where it is stubbed out. The site is level and does not contain any native vegetation. Non-native landscaping is located on the Esplanade frontage and an almond tree is located behind the Blue Haven Pools building. The project site does not contain any drainages, including creeks, swales, or wetlands. Several storm water drainage inlets are located on the project site, which drain into the City of Chico's drainage system. The frontage of the project site is improved with curb,gutter,and sidewalk. The project site is served by public water(California Water Service Company). A fire hydrant is located on the east side of Esplanade,approximately 100 feet north of the project site. Sewer and storm water drainage lines are located along Esplanade. The site is not located within a 100-year flood zone. The project site is located approximately 1.9 miles from the main runway at the Chico Municipal Airport and is located within Airport Compatibility Zone"D"of the Chico Municipal Airport. The project site is not listed on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List (Cortese List) and is not near any listed sites or sites known or suspected to contain hazardous materials. The site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and has a General Plan designation of Commercial. Surrounding parcels are zoned C-2, A-R(Agricultural Residential), or are within the City of Chico. The site is located in a primarily commercial area,although urban residential uses are located to the east and south of the site. ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 1 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudikffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#>`TPM 04-13• The site is located within the City of Chico's Sphere of Influence and has been prezoned C-C (Community Commercial) by the city. The City's General Plan shows that the project site is designated as Community Commercial. L. Surrounding Land Uses: Direction General Plan Designation Zoning Existing Land Use(s) North Commercial C-2 Commercial(mini-storage business) South City of Chico City of Chico Two dwellings East High Density Residential A-R Residential West City of Chico City of Chico Commercial M. Project Description: This is an application for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet. The proposed parcels are, and would continue to be,utilized for commercial uses. Sewage disposal is proposed to be handled by existing on- site septic systems and domestic water supply would be provided by the California Water Service Company. (note: a condition of this project requires that the project site connect to the City of Chico's sanitary sewer system. Connection to the City's sewer system would require extending the existing sewer line on Esplanade approximately 135 feet to the project site.) Proposed Parcel 1 would front on Esplanade,and proposed Parcel 2 would have access to Esplanade via a proposed 22-foot wide road easement across Parcel 1. N. Public Agency Approvals: Butte County Environmental Health Division, Butte County Public Works Department,Butte County Fire Department/CDF,City of Chico. 2.0 DETEPMNATION [ ] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [X] I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [ ] I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. [ ] I find that the proposed project MAY have a"potentially significant impact" or"potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze°only the effects that remain to be addressed. [ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project,nothing further is required. . ��'� �• � � Z3 0 gRevidkbey: y: Stephen Betts, Senior Planner Date Z � Joe Baker,Planning Manager Date ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 2 of 27 ■ ` Project Name: Ronald&Claudleffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13• 3.0 POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS CHECKLIST SETTING A. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact'as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [ ] 4.1 Aesthetics [ ] 4.2 Agriculture Resources [X] 4.3 Air Quality [ ] 4.4 Biological Resources [X] 4.5 Cultural Resources [ ] 4.6 Geologic Processes [ ] 4.7 Hazards/Hazardous Material [ ] 4.8 Hydrology/Water Quality [ ] 4.9 Land Use [ ] 4.10 Mineral Resources [ ]4.11 Noise [ ] 4.12 Housing [ ] 4.13 Public Services [ ]4.14 Recreation [ ] 4.15 Transportation/Traffic [ ] 4.16 Utilities/Service Systems [X]4.17 Mandatory Findings of Significance B. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact' answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards,(e.g.,the project would not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on a project-specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level,indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made,an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated"applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) "Reviewed Under Previous Document." Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case,a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and' state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,"describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate,include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 3 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claud*ffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-131* 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold,if any,used to evaluate each question;and b) The mitigation measure identified,if any,to reduce the impact to less than significant. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 4.1 AESTHETICNVISUAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact Iwith Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including,,but not limited to,trees,rock outcroppings,and historic buildings X within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or , X quality of the site and its surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Impact Discussion: The project site is located on Esplanade,which is developed with numerous commercial uses. The project site consists of two commercial structures and parking areas, and the proposed project would not change this use. Additional commercial development on the proposed parcels is not anticipated because there is very little area remaining on either of the two proposed parcels that could be further developed. With the existing commercial uses found in the project area, no substantial conflicts with the established character or functioning of the surrounding community are anticipated. The site is not located along a State or County designated scenic highway. This project would not affect a scenic vista nor have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. The project may require the installation of approximately 135 feet of sewer pipe within the Esplanade right-of-way. Construction activities association with installation of the sewer pipe would cause short-term visual impacts. Construction activities create a visual impact, and construction debris, rubbish and trash can accumulate on construction sites and are unsightly if visible from public streets. The completion of the sewer pipe installation would eliminate the short-term visual impacts of the construction operations. Mititration Measure: None required. 4.2 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 4 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudoffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13• Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance(Farmland),as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and X Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or a X Williamson Act Contract? c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature,could result in conversion X of Farmland,to non-agricultural use? Impact Discussion: The C-2 zoning of the.project site does not permit agricultural uses. The General Plan land use designation of Commercial does not list agricultural uses as either a Primary or a Secondary Use. The provisions of the Agricultural Element of the Butte County General Plan do not apply to parcels that have a Commercial General Plan land use designation. The soils on the site have a Soil Conservation Service Classification of II (Butte County GIS soils coverage), which are considered prime agricultural soils. The project site is not currently utilized for any type of agricultural use, although one almond tree is located behind the Blue Haven Pools building. No agricultural uses are located within 300 feet of the project site. The project site is not subject to a California Land Conservation Agreement ("Williamson Act"). None of the surrounding or nearby parcels are subject to a California Land Conservation Agreement. The project would not convert agricultural lands to non-agricultural uses and would not have animpactto any agricultural uses. The Butte County Agricultural Commissioner's Office commented that this project would not have an impact to agricultural operations. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.3 AIR QUALITY: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable X air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially X to an existing or projected air qualityviolation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air X quality standard(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 5 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudlaffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13• Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X of people9 Impact Discussion: Both the California Air Resources Board and the Environmental Protection Agency have established air pollution standards in an effort to protect human health and welfare. Geographic areas are designated "attainment' if these standards are met and "nonattainment' if they are not met. In addition, each agency has several levels of classifications based on severity of the problem. Butte County and all northern Sacramento Valley Air Districts have been designated as "moderate" nonattainment areas for the state standards for ozone (03) and fine particulate matter (PM 10). Currently,Butte County is in attainment for all the federal(less stringent)air quality standards. The project site is almost fully developed and no additional commercial uses are expected to be placed on the property. The number of vehicle trips generated by the existing uses would not increase due to this tentative parcel map project. Because the project site is already developed, and no additional commercial uses are anticipated to be placed on either of the proposed parcels, there would not be an increase in vehicle emissions generated by increased vehicular traffic. Emissions from vehicles and construction equipment associated with installation of a sewer pipe from the project site to a point approximately 135 feet south of the project site are not expected to create any significant air quality impacts due to the limited amount of construction activity needed to install the sewer pipe. The existing commercial uses on the project do not appear to cause any significant air quality impacts. The automobile repair business may generate emissions when running vehicles,and odors from oil,grease,or gasoline may occasionally be detected outside of the business. The swimming pool business could occasionally generate odors from swimming pool-related chemicals, such as chlorine. No additional commercial businesses are expected to be placed on the proposed parcels due to the parcels small size and the-area needed for off-street parking. Commercial business on the project site may be required to obtain Authority to Construct and Permit to Operate permits from the Butte County Air Quality Management District. The District reviews these applications to determine if expected air emissions from a business meet all air quality regulations. The District establishes the standards by which the equipment must be operated and is reviewed annually.The equipment is inspected periodically by District staff. The project is not expected to generate any fugitive dust emissions because the project site is already developed and is almost completely covered with structures or pavement. No additional buildings are expected to be placed on the project site. However, demolition of one or both of the existing structures and the construction of new buildings may create fugitive dust emission during site development activities, such as grading, excavation for foundations and utilities, and other soil work. Additional fugitive dust emissions could be generated during installation of the off-site sewer pipe. The Butte County Air Quality Management District recommends incorporating measures to control fugitive dust emission for all road and other construction activities during project development,using such methods as site and driveway watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. Mitigation Measure # 1 is recommended that requires a note be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states dust control measures shall be taken during site development activities. Mitigation Measure # 1 applies to all construction activities associated with installation of a sewer pipe within the Esplanade right-of-way. Mitigation Measure#1: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. Water shall be applied by means of truck(s),hoses, and/or sprinklers as needed prior to any land clearing or earth movement to minimize dust emissions. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 6 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudeffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13• b. Haul vehicles transporting soil into or out of the property shall be covered. c. A water truck shall be on site at all times. Water shall be applied to disturbed areas a minimum of two (2) times per day or more as necessary. d. On-site vehicles shall be limited to a speed of 15 mph on unpaved roads. e. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 24 hours. The telephone number of the Butte County Air Quality Management District shall be visible to ensure compliance with BCAQMD Rule 200 & 205 (Nuisance and Fugitive Dust Emissions). f. All visibly dry disturbed soil surface areas of operation shall be watered to minimize dust emissions. g. Existing roads and street adjacent to the project shall be cleaned at lease once per day unless conditions warrant a greater frequency. Plan Requirements: The note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be'recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet. This note shall also be placed on all building and site development plans. Timing: Requirements of the condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction periods. Monitoring: The Planning Division and the Public Works Department shall ensure that the note is placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet. Department of Development Services shall ensure that this note is placed on all building plans. Building inspectors shall spot check and shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Quality Management District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or through habitat modifications,on any species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or X regional plans,policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies,regulations or by the California X Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 or the Clean Water Act (including,but not limited to,marsh,vernal pool,coastal, X etc.)through direct removal,filling,hydrological interruption,or other means)? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish and wildlife species or with X established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy X ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat X ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 7 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudeffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-130 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local,regional,or state habitat conservationplan? g. A reduction in the numbers,a restriction in the range,or an impact to the critical habitat of any unique,rare,threatened, X or endangered species of animals? h. A reduction in the diversity or numbers of animals onsite (including mammals,birds,reptiles,amphibians,fish or X invertebrates)? i. A deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat(for X foraging,breeding,roosting,nesting,etc.)? j. Introduction of barriers to movement of any resident or X migratory fish or wildlife species? k. Introduction of any factors(light,fencing,noise,human presence and/or domestic animals)which could hinder the X normal activities of wildlife? Impact Discussion: The project site is almost entirely covered with structures or paved surfaces and no native vegetation exists on the site. A small area along the Esplanade frontage of the site is landscaped with non-native vegetation. One almond tree is located behind the Blue Haven Pools structure. The project site does not contain any drainages, including creeks, swales, or wetlands. No heritage oaks exist on the site. The project site is located in an urban area that is developed with commercial and residential uses. A sewer line would need to be installed along the Esplanade right-of-way from the project site to a point approximately 135 feet to the south. No trees,other vegetation, drainages,or wetlands would be disturbed due to installation of the sewer line. The California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB Rarefind 2, Government Version, Jan-02-2003) was reviewed to determine if any special status species or habitats occur on the project site or in the project area. The CNDDB showed no occurrences of any special status species or habitats on the project site or in the immediate project area(0.5 mile radius). This project does not have the potential to have a significant impact to fish or wildlife habitat. The collection of Department of Fish and Game fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR 753.5 is not required. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X a historical resource as defined in§15064.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an X archaeological resource pursuant to§15064.5? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X resource or site or unique geologic feature? ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffms TPM 04-13 ■Page 8 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudoffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-13• Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated d. Disturb any human remains,including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Impact Discussion: Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic period archaeological sites; historical features, such as rock walls, water ditches and flumes, and cemeteries; and architectural features. Cultural resources consist of any human-made site, object(i.e., artifact), or feature that defines and illuminates our past. Often such sites are found in foothill areas, areas with high bluffs, rock outcroppings, areas overlooking deer migratory corridors, or near bodies of water. The project site does not contain any of these characteristics. According to Butte County constraints mapping, the project site is located in an area considered to have a low to moderate archeological sensitivity. The two commercial structures on the project site are of a recent construction and are not considered historic structures and are not associated with anyone of historical importance. The project is not expected to uncover any cultural resources because the site is almost completely developed and it would be very difficult to place any additional commercial uses on the site. However, future development on the project site (i.e., replacement of the existing structures) may uncover and disturb cultural resources that lie below the surface of the ground. To protect cultural resources that may be found on the project Mitigation Measure # 2 is recommended that requires all development activity on the site halt and the County and a qualified archaeologist be notified in the event any cultural resources are encountered during the course of development activities. The project may require the installation of a sewer line from the project site to a point approximately 135 feet south of the project site. Construction activity associated with the installation of the sewer pipe could uncover and disturb cultural resources. Mitigation Measure#2 is applicable to any construction activity associated with the installation of the sewer pipe. Mitization Measure# 2: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Should development activities reveal the presence of cultural resources (i.e., artifact concentrations, including arrowheads and other stone tools or chipping debris, cans, glass, etc.; structural remains; human skeletal remains), work within 50 feet of the find shall cease immediately until a qualified professional"archaeologist can be consulted to evaluate the remains and implement appropriate mitigation procedures. Recommencement of development activities shall not occur until clearance is provided by the Butte County Department of Development Services. Should human skeletal remains be encountered, State law requires immediate notification of the County Coroner. Should the County Coroner determine that such remains are in an archaeological context, the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento shall be notified immediately, pursuant to State law, to arrange for Native American participation in determining the disposition of such remains." This mitigation measure shall apply to all off-site construction activity associated with the installation of a sewer line. Plan Requirements: This note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet and shall be shown on all building and site development plans. Timing: This measure shall be implemented during all site development activities. Monitoring: Should cultural resources be discovered, the landowner and/or the developer shall notify the Planning Division and a professional archaeologist. The Planning Division shall coordinate with the developer and appropriate authorities to avoid damage to cultural resources and determine appropriate action. ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 9 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudieffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-130 4.6 GEOLOGIC PROCESSES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving: 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault X Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? X 3. Seismic-related ground failure,including liquefaction? X 4. Landslides? X b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,or that would become unstable as a result of the project,and X potentially result in on-or off-site landslide,lateral spreading,subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil,as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(1994),creating substantial X risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system X where sewers are not available for the disposal or waste water? Impact Discussion: The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake fault zone and is not within an after shock epicenter region (Butte County GIS Epicenter Regions theme). No known earthquake faults are located within five miles of the project site. The only known active fault in Butte County is the Cleveland Hill fault zone, located approximately 24 miles to the southeast of the project site, where activity on August 1, 1975 resulted in the Oroville earthquake. This earthquake had a Richter magnitude of 5.7 and resulted in approximately 2.2 miles of ground rupture along the western flank of Cleveland Hill. In the northwest comer of Butte County near Chico there are a series of short, north-northwest trending faults similar to the Cleveland Hill fault. These faults appear to be an extension of the Bear Mountain Fault or Foothills Shear Zone. Minor seismic activity has occurred in the area of these short faults;however,other geologic evidence indicates these faults are not active(Butte County General Plan 1977). The 80-mile-long Midland-Sweitzer fault is located approximately 40 miles south-southwest of Butte County. This fault is considered active and has caused historic earthquakes of Richter magnitudes between 6 to 6.9 in the area in 1892. There is some speculation as to the exact location of the historic earthquake epicenters and some question if they actually occurred on the Midland-Sweitzer fault(Butte County, 1977). Approximately five miles west of Butte County there is a north trending fault system known as the Willows fault. This fault is approximately 40 miles long and displaces Cretaceous sediment in the Sacramento Valley. It does not appear to displace surface sediment and has been mapped principally by geophysical methods. However, there have been enough historical seismic events in the vicinity of this fault to conclude that it should be considered potentially active(Butte County General Plan 1977). ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 10 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&ClauAffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-1• A moderate earthquake occurred on the afternoon of Friday, August 10, 2001, centered about nine miles west of Portola, California, and about 65 miles east of the project site. Very little damage occurred as a result of this earthquake, which was had a magnitude of 5.5, but brief groundshaking was felt in Chico during the earthquake and the aftershocks. This earthquake occurred in the Mohawk Valley Fault Zone, and this area of California experiences a magnitude five or higher earthquake approximately every 20 years,according to the University of California,Berkeley Seismological Laboratory. Historical events in the area include the following: Table 1 Historical Seismic Events near Recent Portola Event Near Portola—Mohawk Valley Fault Zone Year Location Magnitude 1875 6.2 40 km to the NNE near Janesville 1888 6.2 20 km to the SSW near Blairsden 1959 5.6 40 km to the ESE near Verdi 1966 6.0 60 km to the SSE near Truckee Source: Adapted from information provided by the California Division of Mines and Geology and posted on the UC-Berkeley Seismological Laboratory web site(httu:/hv�nv..reisurn.berbedev.edu/.ceisma. Like most of central California,the site can be expected to be subjected to seismic ground shaking at some future time. Accordingly, all buildings and other improvements would be designed and installed in accordance with Uniform Building Code requirements. Because the project appears to be located such that the probability of significant groundshaking is low,because the project does not propose the addition of significant structures that would be at risk to seismic activity, and because any structures that are built during the course of the project would be designed and installed in accordance with Uniform Building Code standards for the appropriate Seismic Hazard Zone, potential geologic impacts would be less than significant. The two existing commercial buildings on the project site are of modern design and construction and were installed under permit and inspection from the Butte County Building Division. The Butte County Seismic Safety Element's Liquefaction Potential Map indicates that the site has a generally low potential for liquefaction. The impact would be less than significant. All new structures placed on the project site would comply with applicable portions of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by Butte County, which would mitigate any potential impacts resulting from any sort of ground failure. The Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that there is no potential for landslides in this area. There are no slopes on the project site or in the project area that would be at risk of sliding. The Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map also indicates that the property is located within an area of heavy groundwater withdrawal and is in a potential subsidence area. Although so designated, this designation is general in nature, and is applicable to virtually all of the Central Valley area of Butte County. Although subsidence is a problem in some areas of the Central Valley in California due to groundwater withdrawals for irrigation, there have not been any documented incidents that indicate a specific problem at this location. No impact is anticipated. There is no potential for soil erosion on the project site (Butte County General Plan GIS data). The project site has a slope of less than 1%. No soil disturbance,such as grading,which has the potential to create soil erosion,is expected to occur on the project site because the project site is already developed with two commercial and there is no area remaining for additional businesses. The soil on the site—Vina loam—is not highly susceptible to soil erosion(Soil Survey of the Chico Area,U.S. Department of Agricultural, 1925). No soil erosion is expected to occur on the project site because no soil disturbance activities would be required. The project site requires connection to the City of Chico's sanitary sewer system, which would require the installation of a sewer line on Esplanade approximately 135 feet to the south of the site to connect with the existing sewer line. Construction activity associated with the installation of the sewer pipe would be minimal due to the short distance and no significant soil erosion impacts are anticipated. Construction activity would occur within the Esplanade right-of- way. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 11 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&ClaudOwns,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-1310 All wastewater generated by the existing commercial uses on the project site is disposed of on-site by two septic systems,one on each of the proposed parcels. Both septic systems were placed on the site under permit and inspection by the Butte County Environmental Health Division. The Butte County Environmental Health Division states that the project does not meet the on-site sewage disposal area requirements of the Chico Nitrate Action Plan. A provision in Chapter 19 of the Butte County Code allows the Environmental Health Division the discretion to require a parcel being subdivided to connect to a public sewer system. Butte County Code Section 19-14(c)states the following: When a proposed subdivision is located within a reasonable distance of an existing public sanitary sewer system and it is practicable and feasible for the subdivision to be connected to and be served by the same, the health officer may require that the subdivision be provided with an adequate system of sewer lines and that the system of sewer lines be connected to the aforementioned public sanitary sewer system. As used in this section, the word "subdivision"shall have the same meaning as in chapter 20, relating to subdivisions. A City of Chico sewer line is located on Esplanade,approximately 135 feet to the south of the project site. A condition of project approval requires that the project site connect to the City of Chico's sanitary sewer system. Another condition requires that the existing septic systems be abandoned. By connecting the proposed parcels to the sanitary sewer system and abandoning the existing septic systems, the project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The Conservation Element's Expansive Soils Map indicates that the project site has a low.expansive soil potential. The Butte County Building Division may require soil tests prior to issuance of a building permit to determine if the soils on the site have an expansive potential. Mitil4ation Measure: None required. 4.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environmental through the routine transport use,or disposal X of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident X conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,substances,or waste within one- X quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code X Section 65962.5 and,as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project X result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? I ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■ Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 12 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claud&ffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-130 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or X working in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation X plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,including where X wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with willdlands? Impact Discussion: The project site is not listed on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List (Cortese List) and is not near any listed sites or sites known or suspected to contain hazardous materials. The two existing commercial uses on the project site may store and utilize materials, such as oil, gasoline, cleaning chemicals, and chlorine. However, the amounts of these materials kept on the project site are minimal and would not expose people to any hazardous materials. The project does not involve the use of hazardous materials and would not create any hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. The project site is located approximately 1.4 miles from the main runway at the Chico Municipal Airport. The project site is located with Airport Compatibility Zone "D" of the Chico Municipal Airport (2000 Butte County Airport Compatibility Plan). There are no restrictions on land uses within Compatibility Zone D (other than the height of structures, which is no more than 100 feet above ground level) and the project would not have an impact on aircraft operations. The project site is not located near any private airstrip. None of the existing structures on the project site extend into the protected airspace of the Chico Municipal Airport. The project would not interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact would occur. The project site is not located within the State Responsibility Area(SRA) for wildland fires. A fire hydrant is located on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 100 feet north of the project site. The nearest staffed Butte County fire station is Station # 44 (North Chico), which is located approximately 1.8 miles to the east of the site on Cohasset Road. The project would not expose people or structures to wildland fires. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: ' Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Violate any water quality standards or waste dischargeT— X requirements? ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study–Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 13 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudleffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-130 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g.,the production rate of X preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a X stream or river,in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-of off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount X of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage X systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? L Otherwise substantially degrade waterquality? X g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood X Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which X would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury,or death involving flooding,including flooding as a X result of the failure of a levee or dam? j. Inundation by seiche,tsunami,or mudflow? X Impact Discussion: Domestic water supply for the two existing commercial businesses on the project site is provided by the California Water Service Company. This water provider has adequate supplies of water to continue to provide water service to the project site. No significant impacts to groundwater supplies are expected to occur. The project site is fully developed and no additional development activity would occur. A General Activities Construction Storm Water Permit is not required to be obtained from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board because no additional development is expected to occur on the project site and because the project site is less than an acre in size. A significant increase in stormwater runoff is not expected due to this project. The project site is currently developed with two commercial structures, asphalt driveway/parking areas, and other hardscape, which covers almost all the entire project site with impervious surfaces. The Butte County Public Works Department requires that the applicant submit a plan for a permanent solution for drainage. The plan would specify how drainage waters would be detained on-site and/or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility. The plan is also required to show that there will be no increase in the peak flow of storm water runoff from the site. The project site currently drains into existing on-site storm water drainage inlets that connect to the City of Chico's storm drainage system. ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■ Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 14 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudakffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-130 The project site is not within a floodway or a 100-year flood zone (Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map 06007C-0340C, dated June 8, 1998). Therefore, no people or structures on the site would be subject to flooding. The property is not located in an area prone to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact would occur with respect to these natural hazards. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.9 LAND USE: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Physically divide an established community? X b. Conflict with an applicable land use plan,policy,or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including,but not limited to,the general plan,specific plan, X local coastal program,or zoning ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X natural community conservation plan? Impact Discussion: The proposal would divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet. The C-2 zone does not have a minimum parcel size; lot area is determined by the size.of the building,off- street parking area,and area required for an on-site sewage disposal system(Butte County Code Section 24-175(e)(1)). The Commercial General Plan land use designation likewise does not specify a minimum parcel size. The project is .consistent with the C-2 zoning of the site and with the Commercial General Plan land use designation. The project is located within the City of Chico's Sphere of Influence and is in the Chico Urban Area. The project site abuts parcels that are within the City of Chico. The project site is prezoned CC(Community Commercial)by the city. The City's General Plan shows the project site is designated as Community Commercial. The existing commercial uses on the project site do not appear to be consistent with the City's CC prezoning of the site, which generally allows less intense commercial uses than the County's C-2 zone does. The project site is located in an"island"of county land that is surrounded by the City of Chico, and the parcels on the west side of Esplanade, across from the project site, are within the City of Chico. A request for comments concerning this project was sent to the City of Chico. The City had the following comments: 1. The project should connect to the City's sanitary sewer system since the sewer main is located nearby. 2. Annexation into the City of Chico will be required in order to connect to the sanitary sewer system. 3. Development on Parcel 2 should incorporate a 50%shading of parking lot areas. The Butte County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) commented on this project and recommends that the project parcel annex into the City of Chico in order to provide public sewage and storm water drainage services. This proposal would not physically divide an established community due to its conformity with zoning and surrounding land use. The property is not within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 15 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudgkffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-130 4.10 MINERAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the X residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general X plan,specific plan,or other land use plan? Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not use or extract any mineral or energy resources and would not restrict access to known mineral resource areas. The project is located within an area where there are little or no mineral resources currently being extracted. Therefore,the project would have no impact on mineral resources. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.11 NOISE: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or X noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground X borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the X project? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing X without theproject? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project X expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in X the project area to excessive noise levels? Impact Discussion: The project site is located in a commercial area with elevated noise levels. Noise is generated by the adjacent and nearby commercial uses and from vehicular traffic on Esplanade. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffms TPM 04-13 ■Page 16 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudleffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-130 The project is not expected to cause an increase in noise in the project area because the site is already fully developed with two commercial uses. The two existing commercial business on the site —an automobile repair business and a swimming pool business—are relatively quiet. The automobile repair business, which would create the most noise on the project site, is located on the west side of the project site, away from the residential uses on the parcels to the east of the project site. The C-2 zoning district does not require any building setbacks from property lines unless the parcel abuts a residential zoning district,in which case a 10-foot building setback is required. The project site abuts an A-R zone to the east and the swimming pool business structure is set back 10 feet from this property line. The building setback from the A-R zone helps to prevent or reduce noise generated by the commercial business. Construction activities on the site, such as grading and building construction, would temporarily generate high noise levels on and adjacent to the project site intermittently during project development activities. As already noted, no construction activity is expected to occur on the project site because the site is already developed. Construction activity associated with installation of a sewer line from the project site to a point approximately 135 feet south of the site would generate some noise in the form of construction equipment and vehicles. No significant noise related impacts are anticipated during installation of the sewer line because of the limited amount of construction activity needed. The project site is located approximately 1.9 miles from the main runway at the Chico Municipal Airport. Arriving and departing aircraft occasionally overfly the project site. The noise from overflying aircraft is not significant and does not create excessive noise levels on the project site. Mitigation Measure: None required. I 4.12 HOUSING: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with . Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Induce substantial population growth in an area,either directly(for example,by proposing new homes and X businesses)or indirectly(for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing X elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people,necessitating the X construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Impact Discussion: The proposed Tentative Parcel Map would create two parcels (net increase of one parcel) for commercial uses. Therefore, the project would not affect the population of the area because the parcels would be utilized for commercial uses,not residential uses. The project would not displace individuals or housing. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measure: None required. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffms TPM 04-13 ■Page 17 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Clausffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-130 4.13 PUBLIC SERVICES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which X could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times,or other performance objectives for any of the public services? b. Fireprotection? X c. Police Protection? X d. Schools? X e. Parks? X L Other public services? X Impact Discussion: The project site is not within the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection's State Responsibility Area (SRA). A pressurized community water system(California Water Service Company) exists in the project area and a fire hydrant is located on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 100 feet north of the project site. The Butte County Fire Department/California Department of Forestry requires that a pressurized community water system for fire protection serve the project site. The Butte County Fire Department/CDF will determine the need for a fire hydrant at the project site. The proposal is not expected to result in an increase in demand for police protection services because the project site is fully developed. Sheriff impact fees, as required by Butte County Code, were required to be collected at the time of building permit issuance for the two commercial structures on the project site. The parcels being created would be utilized for commercial uses. Therefore, the project would not have an impact to schools. School impacts fees were required to be collected at the time of issuance of a building permit for the two commercial uses on the project site. Both of the proposed parcels are required to connect to the City of Chico's sanitary sewer system. The additional sewage from the project site flowing into the City's sewage treatment plant is not expected to create any significant impacts to the sewage treatment plant nor require the expansion of the sewage treatment plant. The City of Chico is currently in the process of preparing an Environmental Impact Report for future expansion of the City's sewage treatment facility. The project would require the installation of a sewer pipe from the project site,to' a point approximately 135 feet south of the site. The cost of the installation of this sewer pipe would be borne by the applicant. Installation of the sewer pipe would not cause any significant environmental impacts because all work would be within the Esplanade right-of-way,which does not contain any vegetation or wetlands. Mitillation Measure: None required. ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 18 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudleffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-1 4.14 RECREATION: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial X physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? n clude recreational facilities or require the construction or pansion of recreational facilities which might have an X verse physical effect on the environment? Impact Discussion: The project's contribution of two new parcels for commercial uses would not cause an increase in the usage of parks and other recreational facilities in the Chico area. The project does not include any recreational facilities nor would the project require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e.,result in a substantial increase in either the number of X vehicle trips,the volume to capacity ratio on roads,or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed,either individually or cumulatively,a level of service standard established by the county congestion X management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns,including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results X in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or incompatible X uses e.g.,farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergent access? X L Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g. Conflict with accepted policies,plans or programs supporting alternative transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts, X bicycle racks)? Impact Discussion: Proposed Parcel 1 would front on Esplanade, which is a public road. Proposed Parcel 2 would have access to Esplanade via a proposed 22-foot wide road easement across Parcel 1. Esplanade at the project site consists of four travel lanes and a center turning lane. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 19 of 27 ■ i / f Project Name: Ronald&Claud-Wris,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-130 Esplanade is classified as a major arterial roadway and carries a high volume of vehicular traffic. Esplanade north of Lassen Avenue has a vehicle average daily total of 13,598 (Butte County Association of Government 2003 traffic counts). Traffic generally moves unimpeded on this section of Esplanade. The project would not result in any additional vehicle trips because the project site is already developed with two commercial businesses and additional commercial uses on the site would not be possible due to the small size of the proposed parcels. The Butte County Public Works Department did not identify any traffic impacts that may be caused by the project. Butte County Code Section 24-240 lists the parking requirements for commercial uses. At 6,000 square 'feet, the automotive repair business on proposed Parcel 1 would require 15 parking spaces (one space per 400 square feet of gross floor area). There are currently nine parking spaces next to the building,plus ten angled parking spaces on the south side of the parcel. These two parking areas will remain, although the angled parking spaces on the south side of this parcel would be within a 25-foot wide public utilities easement. The 4,840 square foot swimming pool business on proposed Parcel 2 would require twelve parking spaces (one space per 400 square feet of gross floor area). There are 15 parking spaces on this parcel. This Tentative Parcel Map project would not conflict with accepted policies,plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. This project would require that a sewer line be installed from the project site to a point approximately 135 feet to the south. Installation of this sewer pipe, which would occur within the Esplanade right-of-way, may cause minor disruptions to vehicular traffic on Esplanade. Due to the limited amount of construction needed to install the sewer line no significant impacts to vehicular circulation is expected. As mentioned above, access to proposed Parcel 2 from Esplanade would be via a proposed 22-foot wide easement across proposed Parcel 1. This proposed access does not meet the requirements for approved access to a public road. Butte County Code Section 20-134 (Minimum widths) requires a 60-foot wide access easement, although a 50-foot wide easement may be approved in some situations. The applicant can request an exception to this standard pursuant to Butte County Code Section 20-4(Exceptions to design requirements). Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water QualityControl Board? X b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing X facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the X construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources,or are X new or expanded entitlements needed? ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■ Initial Study—Lafftns TPM 04-13 ■Page 20 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudeffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-130 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has X adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to theprovider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity X to accommodate theproject's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal,state,and local statutes,and X regulations related to solid waste? Impact Discussion: Sewage disposal for the existing commercial uses on the site is handled by two on-site septic systems. With the proposed land division, each parcel would not have sufficient sewage disposal area to meet the sewage disposal requirements of the Chico Nitrate Action Plan. The Butte County Environmental Health Division requires that the project site connect to the City of Chico's sanitary sewer system prior to recordation of the Final Map. The additional sewage flow from the project site into the City of Chico's sanitary sewer system is not expected to result in the need to expand the City's sewage treatment facility. The City of Chico is currently in the process of preparing an Environmental Impact Report for the future expansion of their sewage treatment plant. The project would not have an impact on any wastewater treatment facilities. A City of Chico's sanitary sewer line is located on Esplanade, but currently terminates at the parcel south of and adjacent to the project site (City of Chico Sewer System Map#NE 04-G, Sep 02, 2003). The sewer line would need to be extended up Esplanade to the project site, a distance of approximately 135 feet. The extension of the sewer line would not cause any significant environmental impacts since all work would take place within the Esplanade right-of- way,which does not contain any sensitive animal or plant habitat. Domestic water supply for the existing commercial uses on the site is obtained from a public water system(California Water Service Company). The project would not have a significant impact on any water treatment facilities. No off-site storm water drainage improvements appear to be necessary as a result of this project. Existing storm water drainage inlets on the project site drain into the City of Chico's drainage system. The project would not cause an increase the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill because the project site is fully developed. No impact would occur with respect to federal,state,and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Mitigation Measure: None required. t ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffms TPM 04-13 ■Page 21 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudeffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-130 4.17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (Section 15065): Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a X plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history orprehistory? b. Have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a X project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects)? c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either X directly or indirectly? The project has the potential to contribute impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable with respect to Initial Study Checklist Items 4.3 —Air Quality and 4.5 —Cultural Resources. Cumulative impacts to these areas would be mitigated due to the inclusion of Mitigation Measures 1 through 2 as itemized under Section 5 — Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Requirements. 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: Mitigation Measure#1: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. Water shall be applied by means of truck(s),hoses, and/or sprinklers as needed prior to any land clearing or earth movement to minimize dust emissions. b. Haul vehicles transporting soil into or out of the property shall be covered. c. A water truck shall be on site at all times. Water shall be applied to disturbed areas a minimum of two (2) times per day or more as necessary. d. On-site vehicles shall be limited to a speed of 15 mph on unpaved roads. e. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 24 hours. The telephone number of the Butte County Air Quality Management District shall be visible to ensure compliance with BCAQMD Rule 200 & 205 (Nuisance and Fugitive Dust Emissions). f. All visibly dry disturbed soil surface areas of operation shall be watered to minimize dust emissions. g. Existing roads and street adjacent to the project shall be cleaned at lease once per day unless conditions warrant a greater frequency. Plan Requirements: The note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet. This note shall also be placed on all building and site development plans. Timing: Requirements of the condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction periods. ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 22 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudileffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-1310 Monitoring: The Department of Development Services and the Public Works Department shall ensure that this note is placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet. Department of Development Services shall ensure that this note is placed on all building plans. Building inspectors shall spot check and shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Quality Management District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. Mitigation Measure#2: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Should development activities reveal the presence of cultural resources (i.e., artifact concentrations, including arrowheads and other stone tools or chipping debris, cans, glass, etc.; structural remains; human skeletal remains), work within 50 feet of the find shall cease immediately until a qualified professional archaeologist can be consulted to evaluate the remains and implement appropriate mitigation procedures. Recommencement of development activities shall not occur until clearance is provided by the Butte County Department of Development Services. Should human skeletal remains be encountered, State law requires immediate notification of the County Coroner. Should the County Coroner determine that such remains are in an archaeological context, the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento shall be notified immediately, pursuant to State law, to arrange for Native American participation in determining the disposition of such remains." This mitigation measure shall apply to all off-site construction activity associated with the installation of a sewer line. Plan Requirements: This note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet and shall be shown on all building and site development plans. Timing: This measure shall be implemented during all site development activities. Monitoring: Should cultural resources be discovered,the landowner/developer shall notify the Planning Division and a professional archaeologist. The Planning Division shall coordinate with the developer and appropriate authorities to avoid damage to cultural resources and determine appropriate action. 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL: 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1,Safety Element. Oroville,CA CH2M Hill, 1977. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3,Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV-1, Scenic Highway Element: Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4, Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville,CA: James P.Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Man. Oroville,CA. 11. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study May,Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency,State of California, 1983. 12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map,established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville,CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Mans. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1998 and 2000. ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 23 of 27 ■ ' Project Name: Ronald&Claudieffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-130 14. USGS Quad Maps. 15. Soil May,Chico(1925)/Oroville(1926)Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 16. Soil Survey of Chico(1925)/Oroville(1926), Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 17. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Mali. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. 18. California Natural Diversity Database(CNDDB)accessed through Rarefmd 2,Government Version,Jan-02- 2003. 19. Butte County Association of Govemments 2003 Traffic Counts. 7.0 CONSULTED AGENCIES: [X] Environmental Health [X] Public Works [X] Building Manager [ ] BCAG [ ] ALUC [X] LAFCo [X] Air Qual.Management Dist. [X] City of Chico [ ] City of Biggs [ ] City of Gridley [ ] City of Oroville [ ] Town of Paradise [X] CA Department of Forestry [X] CalTrans(Traffic) [X] Central Reg. Water Quality [ ] Department of Conservation [X] CA Dept. of Fish and Game [ ] Highway Patrol [ ] Army Corps of Engineers [ ] US Fish&Wldlife Service [X] Agricultural Commissioner [ ] Butte Co.Farm Bureau [ ] Oroville Union School Dist. [ ] Feather River Rec.Dist. [X] County Counsel [X] California Water Svc.Co. [ ] LOAPUD [X] PG&E [ ] Pacific Bell [ ] Oroville Union Sch.Dist. [ ] Oroville Elem. School Dist. [X] County Assessor [ ] Thermalito Union Sch.Dist. 8.0 PROJECT SPONSOR(S) INCORPORATION OF MITIGATION INTO PROPOSED PROJECT: IIWe have reviewed the Initial Study for the Ronald & Claudine Laffins, Trustees, Tentative Parcel Map (APN# 006-230-047) application and particularly the mitigation measures identified herein. I/We hereby modify the application on file with the Butte County Planning Department to include and incorporate all mitigations set forth in this Initial Study. 2- 12--OE) Project Sponsor/P of ct Agent Date Project Sponsor/Project Agent Date k:\planning\projects\tpm\laffins.04-13\laffms tpm initial study.doc ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ ■Initial Study—Laffms TPM 04-13 ■Page 24 of 27 ■ Project Name: Ronald&Claudileffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-130 \\\`j�\ / \ � /:�.;' ',1•,F''c-�`'r /\'y�^;•.VYcy �!y��y!LC/�; s,�C� ���/�\ ..�i+l�\ `Y`� ��\/ l`�:'�'< / \\,\/ / �,.. �,✓ �( �/�/` '" if ~ :v.. �, \/ lyr' x 4 .� .. / '�\•`�' �/ :mer `%=- •°ck ■Butte County Department of Development Services ■ ■ Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 25 of 27 ■ • Project Name: Ronald&Claudionns,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-]3• Q 1 fC - z , 1 � 't w 41 NO a, r P�err' {AS t r ;r, 7 .tl�+'_ ,�,5� t - �i�'\ 1_e• •T, � y,� y � y. est 4,6 m Butte County Department of Development Services m m Initial Study—Laffins TPM 04-13 m Page 26 of 27 m A. Project Name: Ronald&Claudioffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map,File#TPM 04-130 ESNIERALDA TRACT 06 MAPS 23 & 38 9�F ao A.P.006-230-046 A.P.006-230-045 9 ,e,b s 37'18'40'E 120.0" DL90 iew, e,.so u• �o M.7e a•swop M= Mu ' ro.a1 • 8 •1)9.m 179.79 •179.x9 179.16• 1)9.72 •1a1.20 S'P.U.E. e .I7ala •179..7 .17a1a .V0.1e •'�� •119.37 8 o PROPOSED BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION �y� 179.x9 •179.2. .179.31 • ; '1 F u Tu- r 0 0 a lam 1 PROPOSED1, N d I I. PROPOSED IPACOCONS7RUCTICH /�Txvc� ,Q 8"- --- -------- ga; c7 ,n9.w ---- •vaae �v9se .i o�.� •179x3 �I I 110.37•• PROPOSED sod I 1 • PARCEL 2 i 9m 14025.5 SF i A.P.006-380-016 °" PROPOSED STORM ; A.P.006-230-048 1)9-)7 1ro.7z ORMI 1 ' d� r)„ry S3718"40"E 179.7• 79.071 �+t7n ^- TT9ae 0715 He COK PA•�7r 1 179.3] 120.0 179.62 I • s IJ9.S3 179.93 79.x]$' I • J;' w : I E14 PM 7u;t v 13•I •179.a7 ' � �- II i I . I I I I I � I I UJI ,�-�I I 3 A 2200 FOOT WZC INGRESS AM .o I 3yMa>)r P.Kv 7� 7 PARCEL 22 NTO OE�RESERVED T IN DEEDS. a 1 c"I n l I I _ t PARI 1 I En 18,913.7 SF . ( I j, PROPOSED SEWER EXISTING BUILDING 7 ' (SUPERIOR AUTO) i I « 1_ �I 119.e3 .I 111)9a �� 179.2] ,Y I In A 23.00 FC10T POC NON-OKLUSRE TIUTIES A AO FOOT WOE I� AND STORONTM FOR WAGE ACU NOK-EXCUMVE EASEWENT I - 4 AND STORY ORAwAfE FAE1U11C3 FOR PU9U°U1WTLES t 'N-A yr v)Lt1pt1( la FOR THE DENEF T OF PARCEL 2 FOR THE 0i or ; I I �, �4 TO BE RESERVED IN OEEDSS. PARCEL 2 TO OE I« RESERVED of OCEDS w''w'www.yyyyECtt a�T I I i e'97E:Cv�•ia a 1 I I I !I 23'P.U.E 1 I 7 YM 1 e 3. ICLOO FOOT1n.n 179Ao iln.aa e'W9, ,I 9DDEEORAWACE EASEMENT Tu '1TATd-----------,)9.73; P' ,-79.� !�•L0n - s•P.U.E ] I I ELS]WC N 37'18.40' W 20.0' 179.33 ' • 17691-__-_ ' 170.e3 Q73,9(e NRO Q112U1 w0 510CI'AUt Hato M,Of T E'YT_T1W T.".v T%Ir0.99 naa««-------«««�«-«--��---- 3----- .«A.E ga.ex -na7o- uan PROJECT BEN011 MARK C311SEEED SQUARE W TOP OF CUIM ESPLANADE (PUBLIC) DATUM. "179.11°"of°'�° DATUM. ! ■Butte County Department of Development Services■ 4 ■ Initial Study-Laffins TPM 04-13 ■Page 27 of 27 ■ • 12/12/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 7:43 AM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 5' TPM 04-13:Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees (continued) Amount Total TOTAL Billable Fees 32.87 $1,915.72 Do Not Bill 0.44 $25.83 Date Employee Price Quantity Amount Total ID Expense Markup % ActivitV: Rublishinq Expense 10/6/2005} PUBLISH 0.00 1.000 0.00 Billable 9928 Publishing Expense Publish in Newspaper-Oroville Mercury - F06-072 - 10/06-05 Ope PUBLISH 116.75 1:0001 f 6.75Billable Publishing Expense Publish in Chico ER 9/13/04 F05-052 Total: Publishing Expense $116.75 TOTAL Billable Costs $116.75 Amount Total Total of Fees (Time Charges) $1,915.72 Total of Costs (Expense Charges) $116.75 Total new charges $2,032.47 Accounts Receivables DatelID Type Description 1/15/2004 CRED Credit ($1,000.00) 504 Receipt #394710. Check#1053 1/15/2004 INV Invoice $36.00 505 1/15/2004 CRED Credit NOD/NOE Recording Fee ($36.00) 506 Receipt #394710. Check#1053 11/2/2004 PAY Payment $740.15 Y ( ) 1194 Receipt #413140 I 12/12/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 7:43 AM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 6 TPM 04-13:Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees (continued) Amount Total 7/12/2005 PAY Payment - Receipt#434513 ($831.35) 1973 ATR#86389 Total Accounts Receivable ($2,571.50) Total New Balance ($539.03) Funds Account: Default Previous account balance $1,686.50 Employee Summary Employee Rate Hours Charges Slip Value Adjustment SB 58.87 12.11 $712.89 $712.89 0.00 CD 59.04 18.26 $1,078.00 $1,078.00 0.00 CAS 45.00 0.45 $20.25 $20.25 0.00 SV 35.33 0.18 $6.36 $6.36 0.00 GLB 138.39 0.33 $45.67 $45.67 0.00 RT 34.12 1.54 $52.55 $52.55 0.00 4 12/12/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 7:43 AM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 1 Nickname TPM 04-13 Laffins Full Name Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees Address 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace Chico CA 95928 Business Fax Home (530)894-1603 Other In Ref To Notes Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt Activity: none 6/9/2005 Carl 59.00 1.89 111.54 Billable 8923 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. Email to YC re PW change in position. 10/18/2004 Steve 59.00 1.92 113.08 Billable 6174 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 11/16/2004 Steve 59.00 0.37 21.63 Billable 6656 Report Wor Project Analysis Made changes to agenda report per SS and e-mailed it to RT for dist. to IDR. 12/2/2004 Steve 59.00 0.42 24.58 Billable 6778 Meeting - Planner IDR review of agenda report 12/6/2004 Cheryl 45.00 0.07 3.00 Billable 6837 Administrative-Clerical Time spent on billing and other administrative tasks not related to processing . 5/10/2005 Carl 59.00 1.14 67.39 Billable 8594 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 5/16/2005 Carl 59.00 1.92 113.17 Billable 8649 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 5/17/2005 Carl 59.00 0.59 35.04 Billable j 8682 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. Reviewed project re road easement. • 12/12/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 7:43 AM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 2 TPM 04-13:Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 5/23/2005 Carl 59.00 0.79 46.51 Billable 8740 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application.. 6/8/2005 Carl 59.00 0.76 44.86 Billable 8914 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 10/14/2004 Cheryl 45.00 0.33 15.00 Billable 6131 Administrative-Clerical Time spent on billing and other administrative tasks not related to processing . 6/10/2005 Carl 59.00 0.58 34.42 Billable 8939 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 7/7/2005 Carl 59.00 1.64 96.74 Billable 9216 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 7/8/2005 Carl 59.00 1.25 73.72 Billable 9217 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 7/8/2005 Gwyn �01 0.33 45.67 Billable 9225 Administrative-Clericalzpf Time spent on billing and other administrative tasks not related to processing . �7/11j20051 Carl, 59.00 2.05 120.98 Billable 9-230 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 8/15/2005 Carl 59.00 4.66 274.89 Billable 9576 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. C778-P16/2005-Carl 59.00 0.38 22.49 Billable 9585 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. .2 00 5 Carl 59.00 0.36 21.50 Billable 9728 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 12/12/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 7:43 AM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 3 TPM 04-13:Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 10/3/,2005)Carl . 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable 9929 Report &/or Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. Confirmed that property annexed to City of Chico. 10/3/2005,-Sherry 35.00 0.18 6.36 Billable 69934 Publication - Clerical Time spent preparing & publishing for Hearing related to applicant. 1/20/2004 Roni 34.00 0.37 12.64 Billable 2913 Initial Processing - Clerical Input, initial clerical processing of application. 3/17/2004 Steve 59.00 0.67 39.33 Billable 3592 CEQA Worked on the initial study 1/26/2004 Roni 34.00 0.83 28.31 Billable 2962 Initial Processing - Clerical Input, initial clerical processing of application. 1/15/2004 Steve 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 2999 Circulation - Planner Took in new application 1/20/2004 Steve 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable 3000 Circulation - Planner Determine an application's completeness/circulate for staff comments/analysis. 1/23/2004 Steve 59.00 0.42 24.58 Billable 3001 CEQA Worked on the initial study 2/4/2004 Steve 59.00 0.33 19.67 Billable 3102 Meeting - Planner IDR meeting 2/5/2004 Steve 59.00 0.42 24.58 Billable 3103 Correspondence -Planner Incomplete letter to RAR 3/11/2004 Steve 59.00 1.75 103.25 Billable 3530 CEQA Worked on initial study . 12/12/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 7:43 AM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 4 TPM 04-13:Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 3/17/2004 Ste\e 59.00 0.67 39.33 Billable 3586 CEQA Worked on the initial study 3/18/2004 Steve 59.00 1.33 78:67 Billable 3591 CEQA Worked on initial study. E-mailed it to JB. 10/13/2004 Steve 59.00 0.67 39.33 Billable 6110 Report &/or Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 4/16/2004 Joe 59.00 0.39 22.80 Do Not Bill 3923 Management Review 0.39 22.80 Management Review- Initial Study 6/4/2004 Steve 59.00 0.07 3.93 Billable 4254 Phone Calls/Counter- Planner Phone conservation w/Ken Skillman - RAR 6/4/2004 Steve 59.00 0.12 6.88 Billable 4258 CEQA E-mail to JB with IS attached. 7/1/2004 Joe . 59.00 0.05 3.03 Do Not Bill 4682 Management Review 0.05 3.03 Management Review- Initital Study 8/24/2004 Cheryl 45.00 0.05 2.25 Billable 5446 Administrative-Clerical Time spent on billing and other administrative tasks not related to processing . 9/7/2004 Steve 59.00 1.42 83.58 Billable 5619 CEQA Prepare neg dec notice, copies for SCH, SCH form, and addresses 9/8/2004 Roni 34.00 0.34 11.60 Billable 5631 Publication -Clerical Time spent preparing & publishing for CEQA related to applicant. 10/13/2004 Steve 59.00 . 0.78 46.22 Billable 6109 Report &/or Project Analysis Worked on agenda report Total: none 32.87 $1,915.72 Do Not Bill 0.44 $25.83 Planning and Land Use "Development does not mean a change of (Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1200) organization", as defined in Section 56021 or a "reorganization',as defined in Section 56073. 65934. State agency (Amended by Stats. 1978, Ch. 1113;Amended by Stats. "State agency"means any agency,board,or commissiof 1986, Ch. 688;Amended by Stats. 1992, Ch. 1003.) of state government. For all purposes of this chapte t term "state agency" shall include an air pollution co 65928. Development project district. "Development project" means any project undertaken (Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1200) for the purpose of development. "Development project' includes a project involving the issuance of a permit for construction or reconstruction but not a permit to operate. Article 3. Applications for Development Projects "Development project" does not include any ministerial projects proposed to be carried out or approved by ublic 65aac �List specifying required data fordevelopment agencies. pr (Amended by Stats. 1978, Ch. 1113) stagency and each local agency shall compile one or more lists which shall specify in detail the information 65928.5. Geothermal field development that willxbc,required from.any-applicant-for-a developuiant "Geothermal field development project" means a project. The list or lists may include the consolidated project development project as defined in Section 65928 which is 4 7-ffff"ion form developed pursuant to Section 65946.Each composed of geothermal wells,resource transportation lines, local agency shall revise the list of information required production equipment,roads,and other facilities which are from an applicant to include a certification of compliance necessary to supply geothermal energy to any particular heat with Section 65962.5, and the statement of application utilization equipment for its productive life, all within an required by Section 65943. Copies of the information, area delineated by the applicant. including the statement of application required by Section (Added by Stats. 1978, Ch. 1271.) 65943, shall be made available to all applicants for development projects and to any person who requests the 65929. Lead agency information. "Lead agency"means the public agency which has the (Amended by Stats. 1982, Ch. 84; Amended by Stats. principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a 1986, Ch. 1048 and Ch. 1019; Amended by Stats. 1987, project. Ch. 985;Amended by Stats. 1992, Ch. 1200.) (Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1200.) 65940.5. Waivers of time limits 65930. Local agency (a) No list compiled pursuant to Section 65940 shall "Local agency" means any public agency other than a include an extension or waiver of the time periods prescribed state agency. For purposes of this chapter,a redevelopment by this chapter within which a state or local'agency shall agency is a local agency and is not a state agency. act upon an application for a development project. (Amended by Stats. 1978, Ch. 1113) (b)No application shall be deemed incomplete for lack of an extension or waiver of time periods prescribed by this 65931. Project chapter within which a state or local government agency "Project'means any activity involving the issuance to a shall act upon the application. person of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other (c)Except for the extension of the time limits pursuant entitlement for use by one or more public agencies. to Section 65950.1, no public agency shall require an (Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1200.) extension or waiver of the time limits contained in this chapter as a condition of accepting or processing the 65932. Public agency application for a development project. "Public agency" means any state agency, any county, (Added by Stats. 1986, Ch.396;Amended by Stats. 1993, city and county, city, regional agency, public district, Ch. 1068;Amended by Stats. 1998, Ch. 283) redevelopment agency,or other political subdivision. (Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1200.) 65941. Required criteria for completeness (a)The information compiled pursuant to Section 65940 65933. Responsible agency shall also indicate the criteria which the agency will apply "Responsible agency"means a public agency,other than in order to determine the completeness of any application the lead agency, which has responsibility for carrying out submitted to it for a development project. or approving a project. 142 • 2004 Planning,Zoning,and Development Laws .i Planning and Land Use (b)If a public agency is a lead or responsible agency for (a)To provide sufficient information to permit the public purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, agency to make the determination required by Section Division 13(commencing with Section 21000)of the Public 21080.1 of the Public Resources Code, as provided by Resources Code,that criteria shall not require the applicant Section 65941. to submit the informational equivalent of an environmental (b) To comply with the enactment of new or revised impact report as part of a complete application, or to federal, state, or local requirements, except for new or otherwise require proof of compliance with that act as a revised requirements of a local agency which is also the prerequisite to a permit application being deemed complete. lead agency. However,that criteria may require sufficient information to (Amended by Stats. 1983, Ch. 1263;Amended by Slats. permit the agency to make the determination required by 1987, Ch. 802 and Ch. 803) p �� Section 21080.1 of the Public Resources Code. 6 (c) Consistent with this chapter, a responsible ey 5943. 30-day revie�3 -calend eashall,at the request of the applicant,commence pro sin ater tha __days afterany public a permit application for a development project prior to final agency has received an application for a development action on the project by a lead agency to the extent that the project, the agency shall determine in writing whether the information necessary to commence the processing is application is complete and shall immediately trarismit the available. For purposes of this subdivision, "lead agency" determination to the applicant for the development project. and"responsible agency" shall have the same meaning as If the written determination is not made within 30 days after those terms are defined in Section 21067 of the Public receipt of the application, and the application includes a Resources Code and Section 21069 of the Public Resources statement that it is an application for a development permit, Code,respectively. the application shall be deemed complete for purposes of (Amended by Stats. 1978, Ch. 1113;Amended by Stats this chapter. upon receipt of any resubmittal of the 1993, Ch. 1131.) application,a new 30-day period shall begin,during which the public agency shall determine the completeness of the 65941.5. Application application. If the application is determined not to be Each public agency shall notify applicants for complete, the agency's determination shall specify those development permits of the time limits established for the parts of the application which are incomplete and shall review and approval of development permits pursuant to indicate the manner in which they can be made complete, Article 3 (commencing with Section 65940) and Article 5 including a list and thorough description of the specific (commencing with Section 65950), of the requirements of information needed to complete the application. The subdivision(e)of Section 65962.5,and of the public notice applicant shall submit materials to the public agency in distribution requirements under applicable provisions of law. response to the list and description. The public agency shall also notify applicants regarding the (b)Not later than 30 calendar days after receipt of the provisions of Section 65961. The public agency may charge submitted materials, the public agency shall determine in applicants a reasonable fee not to exceed the amount writing whether they are complete and shall immediately reasonably necessary to provide the service required by this transmit that determination to the applicant. If the written section. If a fee is charged pursuant to this section,the fee determination is not made within that 30-day period, the shall be collected as part of the application fee charged for application together with the submitted materials shall be the development permit. deemed complete for purposes of this chapter. (Added by Stats. 1983, Ch. 1263; Amended by Stats. (c) If the application together with the submitted 1987, Ch. 985.) materials are determined not to be complete pursuant to subdivision (b), the public agency shall provide a process 65942. Revisions for the applicant to appeal that decision in writing to the The information and the criteria specified in Sections governing body of the agency or, if there is no governing 65940, 65941, 65941.5 shall be revised as needed so that body, to the director of the agency, as provided by that they shall be current and accurate at all times. Any revisions agency. A city or county shall provide that the right of appeal shall apply prospecti•lely only and shall not be a basis for is to the governing body or, at their option, the planning determining that an application is not complete pursuant to commission, or both. Section 65943 if the application was received before the There shall be a final written determination by the agency revision is effective except for revisions for the following on the appeal not later than 60 calendar days after receipt of reasons resulting from the conditions which were not known the applicant' s written appeal., The fact that an appeal is and could not have been known by the public agency at the permitted to both the planning commission and to the time the application was received: governing body does not extend the 60-day period. Notwithstanding a decision pursuant to subdivision(b)that 2004 Planning,Zoning,and Development Laws • 143 S Planning and Land Use the application and submitted materials are not complete,if (b) The provisions of subdivision (a) shall not be the final written determination on the appeal is not made construed as requiring an applicant to submit with his or within that 60-day period,the application with the submitted her initial application the entirety of the information which materials shall be deemed complete for the purposes of this a public agency may require in order to take final action on chapter. the application. Prior to accepting an application, each (d)Nothing in this section precludes an applicant and a p blit agency shall inform the applicant of an information public agency from mutually agreeing to an extension of included in the list-prepared pursuant to Section 65940 which any time limit provided by this section. will subsequently be required from the applicant in order to (e) A public agency may charge applicants a fee not to complete final action on the application. exceed the amount reasonably necessary to provide the (c) This section shall not be construed as limiting the service required by this section. If a fee is charged pursuant ability of a public agency to request and obtain information to this section, the fee shall be collected as part of the which may be needed in order to comply with the provisions application fee charged for the development permit. of Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the (Amended by Stats. 1979, Ch. 1207;Amended by Stats. Public Resources Code. 1984, Ch. 1723; Amended by Stats. 1987, Ch. 1985; (Amended by Stats. 1982, Ch. 84.) Amended by Stats. 1989, Ch. 612) 65945. Applicant's request for notification at proposed 65943.5. Appeal land use action (a)Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, (a)At the time of filing an application for a development any appeal pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 65943 permit with a city or county,the city or county shall inform involving a permit application to a board, office, or the applicant that he or she may make a written request to department within the California Environmental Protection receive notice from the city or county of a proposal to adopt Agency shall be made to the Secretary for Environmental or amend any of the following plans or ordinances: Protection. (1)A general plan. (b)Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, (2)A specific plan. any appeal pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 65943 (3)A zoning ordinance. involving an application for the issuance of an environmental (4) An ordinance affecting building permits or grading permit from an environmental agency shall be made to the permits. Secretary for Environmental Protection under either of the The applicant shall specify, in the written request, the following circumstances: types of proposed action for which notice is requested. Prior (1)The environmental agency has not adopted an appeals to taking any of those actions,the city or county shall give process pursuant to subdivision (c)of Section 65943. notice to any applicant who has requested notice of the type (2) The environmental agency declines to accept an of action proposed and whose development project is appeal for a decision pursuant to subdivision(c)of Section pending before the city or county if the city or county 65943. determines that the proposal is reasonably related to the (c) For purposes of subdivision (b), "environmental applicant's request for the development permit. Notice shall permit"has the same meaning as defined in Section 71012 be given only for those types of actions which the applicant of the Public Resources Code,and"environmental agency" specifies in the request for notification. has the same meaning as defined in Section 71011 of the The city or county may charge the applicant for a Public Resources Code,except that"environmental agency" development permit, to whom notice is provided pursuant does not include the agencies described in subdivisions(c) to this subdivision,a reasonable fee not to exceed the actual and(h)of Section 71011 of the Public Resources Code. cost of providing that notice. If a fee is charged pursuant to (Added by Stats. 1993, Ch. 419.) this subdivision, the fee shall be collected as part of the application fee charged for the development permit. 65944. gency acceptance of application (b) As an alternative to the notification procedure After a public agency accepts an application as prescribed by subdivision(a),a city or county may inform complete, the agency shall not_subsequently request.of an the applicant at the time of filing an application for a applicant any pew or_additionaLinformation which was not development permit that he or she may subscribe to a specified in the list prepared pursuant to Section 65940. The periodically updated notice or set of notices from the city agency ay, in the course of processing the application, or county which lists pending proposals to adopt or amend request the applicant to clarify,amplify,correct,or otherwise any of the plans or ordinances specified in subdivision(a), supplement the information required,for the application.,-,.-,-, together with the status of the proposal and the date of any hearings thereon which have been set. 144 • 2004 Planning,Zoning,and Development Laws Planning and Land Use Only those proposals which are general, as opposed to 65945.7. Error in procedures parcel-specific in nature, and which the city or county No action, inaction, or recommendation regarding any determines are reasonably related to requests for ordinance,rule,or regulation subject to this Section 65945, development permits, need be listed in the notice. No 65945.3,or 65945.5 by any legislative body,administrative proposal shall be required to be listed until such time as the body, or the officials of any state or local agency shall be first public hearing thereon has been set. The notice shall held void or invalid or be set aside by any court on the ground be updated and mailed at least once every six weeks;except of any error, irregularity, informality, neglect or omission that a notice need not be updated and mailed until a change (hereinafter called "error") as to any matter pertaining to in its contents is required. notices,records,determinations,publications or any matters The city or county may charge the applicant for a of procedure whatever, unless after an examination of the development permit, to whom notice is provided pursuant entire case, including evidence, the court shall be of the to this subdivision,a reasonable fee not to exceed the actual opinion that the error complained of was prejudicial, and cost of providing that notice,including the costs of updating that by reason of such error the party complaining or the notice, for the length of time the applicant requests to appealing sustained and suffered substantial injury,and that be sent the notice or notices. a different result would have been probable if such error (Added by Stats. 1983, Ch. 1263.) had not occurred or existed. There shall be no presumption that error is prejudicial or that injury was done if error is 65945.3. Applicant's request for notification of proposed shown. action on local permit process (Added by Slats. 1983, Ch. 1263.) At the time of filing an application for a development permit with a local agency,other than a city or county,the 65946. (Repealed by Stats. 1993, Ch. 56) local agency shall inform the applicant that he or she may make a written request to receive notice of any proposal to adopt or amend a rule or regulation affecting the issuance Article 5. Approval of Development Permits of development permits. Prior to adopting or amending any such rule or regulation, 65950. Time limits for lead agency the local agency shall give notice to any applicant who has (a) Any public agency that is the lead agency for a requested such notice and whose development project is development project shall approve or disapprove the project pending before the agency if the local agency determines within whichever of the following periods is applicable: that the proposal is reasonably related to the applicant's (1)One hundred eighty days from the date of certification request for the development permit. The local agency may by the lead agency of the environmental impact report if an charge the applicant for a development permit, to whom environmental impact report is prepared pursuant to Section notice is provided pursuant to this section,a reasonable fee 21100 or 21151 of the Public Resources Code for the not to exceed the actual cost of providing that notice. If a development project. fee is charged pursuant to this section, the fee shall be (2)Ninety days from the date of certification by the lead collected as part of the application fee charged for the agency of the environmental impact report if an development permit. environmental impact report is prepared pursuant to Section (Added by Stats. 1983, Ch. 1263) 21100 or 21151 of the Public Resources Code for the development project and all of the following conditions are 65945.5. Applicant's request for notification of proposed met: action on state permit process I (A) The development project is affordable to very low At the time of filing an application for a development or low-income households, as defined by Sections 50105 permit with a state agency,the state agency shall inform the and 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code,respectively. applicant that he or she may make a written request to receive (B)Prior to the application being deemed complete for notice of any proposal to adopt or amend a regulation the development project pursuant to Article 3(commencing affecting the issuance of development permits and which with Section 65940),the lead agency received written notice implements a statutory provision. from the project applicant that an application has been made Prior to adopting or amending any such regulation,the or will be made for an allocation or commitment of state agency shall give notice to any applicant who has financing, tax credits, bond authority, or other financial requested such notice and whose development project is assistance from a public agency or federal agency,and the pending-before the state agency if the state agency notice specifies the financial assistance that has been applied determines that the proposal is reasonably related to the for or will be applied for and the deadline for application applicant's request for the development permit. for that assistance,the requirement that one of the approvals (Added by Stats. 1983, Ch. 1263.) of the development project by the lead agency is a 2004 Planning,Zoning,and Development Laws • 145 Planning and Land Use prerequisite to the application for or approval of the (1) Within 180 days from the date on which the lead application for financial assistance, and that the financial agency has approved the project. assistance is necessary for the project to be affordable as (2)Within 180 days of the date on which the completed required pursuant to subparagraph(A). application for the development project has been received (C)There is confirmation that the application has been and accepted as complete by that responsible agency. made to the public agency or federal agency prior to (b)At the time a decision by a lead agency to disapprove certification of the environmental impact report. a development project.becomes final, applications for that (3) Sixty days from the date of adoption by the lead project which are filed with responsible agencies shall be agency of the negative declaration if a negative declaration deemed withdrawn. is completed and adopted for the development project. (Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1200; Amended by Stats. (4)Sixty days from the determination by the lead agency 1988, Ch. 1187.) that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(Division 13(commencing with Section 21000) 65952.1. Time limits for map approval/disapproval of the Public Resources Code)if the project is exempt from (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (b), the California Environmc-tal Quality Act. where a development project consists of a subdivision (b)Nothing in this section precludes a project applicant pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (Division 2 and a public agency from mutually agreeing in writing to (commencing with Section 664 10)of Title 7),the time limits an extension of any time limit provided by this section established by Sections 65950 and 65952 shall apply to the pursuant to Section 65957. approval or disapproval of the tentative map, or the parcel (c) For purposes of this section, "lead agency" and map for which a tentative map is not required. "negative declaration"shall have the same meaning as those (b) The time limits specified in Sections 66452.1, terms are defined in Sections 21067 and 21064 of the Public 66452.2,and 66463 for tentative maps and parcel maps for Resources Code,respectively. which a tentative map is not required,shall continue to apply (Amended by Stats. 1983;Amended by Stats. 1989, Ch. and are not extended by the time limits specified in 847;Amended by Stats. 1993, Ch. 1068;Amended by Stats. subdivision(a). 1996, Ch. 80;Amended by Stats. 1998, Ch. 283;Amended (Added by Stats. 1982,Ch.87.;Amended by Stats. 1989, by Stats. 1999, Ch. 967.) Ch. 847.) 65950.1. Extension of time 65952.2. Approval or disapproval of project Notwithstanding Section 65950, if there has been an No public agency shall disapprove an application for a extension of time pursuant to Section 21100.2 or 21151.5 development project in order to comply with the time limits of the Public Resources Code to complete and certify the specified in this chapter. Any disapproval of an application environmental impact report,the lead agency shall approve for a development project shall specify reasons for or disapprove the project within 90 days after certification disapproval other than the failure to timely act in accordance of the environmental impact report. with the time limits specified in this chapter. (Added by Stats. 1983, Ch. 1240.) (Added by Stats. 1993, Ch. 1068.) 65951. Waiver of time limits 65953. Maximum limits In the event that a combined environmental impact All time limits specified in this article are maximum time report-environmental impact statement is being prepared on limits for approving or disapproving development projects. a development project pursuant to Section 21683.6 of the All public agencies shall,if possible,approve or disapprove Public Resources Code, a lead agency shall approve or development projects in shorter periods of time. disapprove the project within 90 days after the combined (Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1200.) environmental impact report-environmental impact statement has been completed and adopted. 65954. Conflict with federal rules (Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1200; Amended by Stats. The time limits established by this article shall not apply 1998, Ch. 283.) in the event that federal statutes or regulations require time schedules which exceed such time limits. 65952. Time limits for responsible agency (Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1200.) (a)Any public agency which is a responsible agency for a development project that has been approved by the lead 65955. Inapplicability agency shall approve or disapprove the development project The time limits established by this article shall not apply within whichever of the following periods of time is longer: to applications to appropriate water where such applications have been protested pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing 146 4 2004 Planning,Zoning,and Development Laws Page 1 of 1 Durling, Carl From: Durling, Carl Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:59 AM To: Viernes, Sherry Subject: RE: IDR 083105 Agenda Sherry Williams was an IDR 10 day review of ah Initial Study, not final condition check. Laffins was supposed to be set for IDR final condition check. I emailed you both documents. Carl From: Viernes, Sherry Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 8:40 AM To: Bottenfield, Cliff; Breedon, Dan; Durling, Carl; Edell, Stuart; Fogel, Doug; Fowler, Steve; Haslem, Felicia; Hill, Rob; Hunter, Joe; Johnston, Mary; Lawrence, Gail; Leasure, Paula; Lucas, Steve; MacKenzie, Robert; Mann, Cyndi; McCracken, Shari; McIntosh, Paul; Michelena, Mark; Price, Richard; Read, Darren; Reimers, Ken; Rutherford, Scott; Schroth, Eric; Seidler, Kim; Severin, Vance; Starrett, Bill; Teitelman, Eric M.; Tolley, Chris; Borzage, Susie; Connelly, Bill; Dolan, Jane; Houx, Mary Anne; Josiassen, Curt; Pereira, Susan; Terry, Judith; Yamaguchi, Kim Subject: IDR 083105 Agenda Attached is the IDR Agenda for August 31, 2005. It is being provided for your perusal. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Thank you, SPt.mu .C. `Uie� Office Specialist, Senior Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-5260 8/29/2005 • 1� RAR 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO,CALIFORNIA 95973-5811 • TELEPHONE 530-895-1422 • FAX 530-895-1409 ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS CIVIL ENGINEERS ,rcdUNTY January 11, 2005 'JAN 13 2005 DEVELOPMENT Mr. Stephen Betts i SERVICES Senior Planner Butte County Dept. of Development Svcs. 7 County Center:-Drive Oroville, CA 95965 SUBJECT. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR RONALD AND CLAUDINE LAFFINS ON A.P.N. 006-230-047, TPM 04-13 Dear Mr. Betts: In response to our meeting Iast,Friday, we have made the Tentative Map revisions requested by Public Works and enclosed 20 copies of same for your distribution. We are still seeking exceptions to design requirements in accordance with Butte County Code Section 20-4 as previously requested in our correspondence dated February 11, 2004 (copy attached); specifically, Code Section 20-134 pertaining to minimum right-of-way widths and proposing the utilization of Code Section 20-136 "Private easement as approved access." _. ,. �A propos; 41 foot,wide;-,no xclusi a ing r egress'and,public-utility asement.along the southeast side of Parcel-l-shall--serve Parcel 2. Diagonal parking spaces utilized by Parcel 1 are, and will continue to be, along the southeasterly 16 feet of the 41 foot wide paved strip. The remaining 25 feet is the aisleway/accessway serving the two parcels. In approximately March of 2004, the parking lot serving Superior Auto (Parcel 1) received a 11/2 inch asphalt concrete overlay of the existing pavement section, while the new parking lot serving Blue Haven Pools (Parcel 2) was constructed of a 2 inch asphalt concrete pavement over ' 8 inches of Class 2 aggregate base. The existing structural sections of ;hese parking lot areas are sufficient to handle the light vehicle traffic anticipated. No heavy trucks are expected to utilize this parking lot/accessway. We areralsoyseekin-g—n-exception to County Standard No. R5-2 which is the typical sections for urban subdivision roads. { Should you require additional information to process these requested design exceptions and to proceed with the subject Tentative Map, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ROLLS, ANDERSON& ROLLS Kenneth G. Skillman III, P.E., P.L.S. cc: Ron Laffins T:\Data\PRQIECTS\03184\BeBs-011105.wpd , i RAR 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO,CALIFORNIA 95973-5811 • TELEPHONE 530-895-1422 • FAX 530.895-1409 ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS CIVIL ENGINEERS February 11, 2004 Mr. Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 SUBJECT. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR RONALD AND CLAUDINE LAFFINS ON A.P.N. 006-230-047, TPM 04-93 Dear Mr. Betts: In response to your letter of February 5, 2004, we have enclosed a copy of a letter from Butte County Environmental Health dated January 20, 2004 which is an updated Pre-Application for this site. They have removed the condition which required this subdivision to connect to the City of Chico sewer system for the reasons cited therein. We have reviewed Butte County Code .Sections 20-4, 20-134 and 20-136 concerning exceptions to design requirements, minimum right-of-way widths and private easement as approved access and hereby request a design exception to allow proposed Parcel 2 to access the Esplanade via a 22.00 foot wide ingress and egress easement across proposed Parcel 1 on the basis that existing development affected the property and other special circumstances. When the existing auto repair shop and associated parking facilities were constructed, the entire frontage along the Esplanade was developed while leaving the back half of A.P.N. 006-230-047 vacant. We would further submit to you that it is not uncommon within commercial subdivisions to have various internal access, parking and utility easements or common areas without dedicated streets. Since this site is zoned C- General Commercial, we believe that the granting of our requested design exception would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the territory. Please feel free to contact us should questions arise or if additional information is needed to process this request. Sincerely, ROLLS, ANDERSON& ROLLS Kenneth G. Skillman III, P.E., P.L.S. cc: Ron Laffins RECEIVED T:1Da1a%PROJECTS1031 B41Betls-021104.wpd JAN i 3 2005 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ;. CI!QAnet -Laffins Tentative 1 el Map (TPM 04-13) • Pagell of 2 California Home Wednesday, 0 or ff' .. 99 . WJ Nw, _: . . # OPR Home>CEoanet Home>CEQAnet Query>Search Results>Document Description Laffins Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 04-13) SCH Number:2004092044 Type: Neg Project Description Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 0.8-acre parcel into one parcel of 16,914 sf(0.39 acres)and one parcel of 18,025 sf(0.41 acres). Project Lead Agency Butte County Contact Information Primary Contact: Stephen Betts Butte County (530)538-7153 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Project Location County: Butte City: Chico Region: Cross Streets: Esplanada and East/West Lassen Parcel No:006-230-047 Township: Range: Section: Base: Other Location Info: Proximity To Highways: SR 99, SR 32 Airports: Chico Municipal Railways: UPRR Waterways: Mud Creek, Keefer Slough,Sycamore Creek,Lindo Channel Schools:Shasta Elem.,McManus Elem. Land Use:Commercial/C-2/Commercial Development Type Commercial Local Action Subdivision Project Issues Aesthetic/Visual,Agricultural Land,Air Quality,Archaeologic-Historic,Cumulative Effects, Drainage/Absorption, Flood Plain/Flooding, http://www.ceganet.ca.gov/DocDescription.asp?DocPK=573454 10/13/2004 .GiQAnet- Laffins Tentative 1 e1 Map (TPM 04-13) 4 Page 2 of 2 Hazard, Geologic/Seismic, Growth Inducing, Landuse, Minerals,Noise, Population/Housing Balance,Public Services, Recreation/Par Schools/Universities, Septic System, Sewer Capacity,Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading, Solid Waste,Toxic/Hazardous,Traffic/Circul Water Quality,Water Supply,Wetland/Riparian,Wildlife Reviewing Agencies(Agencies in Bold Type submitted comment letters to the State Clearinghouse) Resources Agency; Regional Water Quality Control Bd., Region 5(Redding); Department of Parks and Recreation; Native American I Commission; Public Utilities Commission;Office of Historic Preservation;Department of Forestry and Fire Protection; Department of F Region 2; Department of Water Resources;Caltrans, District 3;Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Received:9/10/2004 Start of Review:9/10/2004 End of Review: 10/12/2004 CEQAnet[TOME I \BBV SEARCH hq://www.ceganet.ca.gov/DocDescription.asp?DocPK=573454 10/13/2004 (SPACE FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE In The Matter Of . '.,`BUTTE COUNTY,Lw •IANN" COMMISSION; NCE OF IN ENT . Notice of Intent. No. TO.ADOPTO 'A4. `•: ' MITIGATED:NEGAT.I0 .DECLARATION::;; In accordance.`,with the.'California' Environ?' AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION mental Quality AEt (CEQA), Butte County. has''preps?ed 'ivinitial State Of California Studyand is considering. tlie<�adoption of,a Mifi; - gated_Negative Declara; ss. tion for the following pro= County of Butte jeer MITIGATED.NEGATIVE . DECLARATION/TENVO The undersigned resident of the county of :TATIVe PARCEL'MAR7 Butte, State of California, says: LafRfl s,Trustees,"ald Ten tative.Parcel' Map to divide a 34,0025..sgguare That I am, and at all time herein mentioned n feet. The.proposed par-' was a citizen of the United States and not a party cel into,one•1.6,914 square feet of et acid to nor interested in the above entitled matter; one. parcel.of18,025 square'feet: `The'•pro. that I am the principal clerk of the printer and posed parcels are, and publisher of would'continue to be, . utilized for commercial uses,-Proposed,Parcet,1 would- - front on The Chico Enterprise-Record Esplanade;:.:�an'" pro-. The Oroville Mercury-Register ;.posed.Parcel,2'would ave.` "'access Spl That said newspaper is one of general circula- posed 2Tf via.°a.: pro.. . posed 22-foot wide road casement.across Parcel tion as defined by Section 6000 Government 1;,.' The',pro' ' site Code of the State of California, Case No. 26796 located oii,the:east side of Esplanade,"=Chico.'. by the Superior Court of the State of California, APN 006-230-04T(SB) in and for the County of Butte;that said newspa- (File#TPM 04-13) The'.CaliI rnia ;Env,!;; per at all times herein mentioned was printed ton mentaI. Quality Act" requiies_:this-:n otice.to and published daily in the City of Chico and disclose',;whether any . County of Butte;that the notice of which the listed toxic.sites are pre; sent on.the,Projeci site.. annexed is a true printed copy, was published in . The project site, oes not ' said newspaper on the following days: contain :'a. listed.;tots., site. ;;,b•.:;.r,4 '"The�InitialSfudy/Mill= ' gated,Negative:Declara Sept. 13, 04. tion and reference docu.1 ments for this prolect'a e' on file'for public review starting.Septembe[ 1:3,, 20.0.4; through.October i 12;.,2004,'at the*Bu' i Countys:Plann'ing Dated September 15,2004. sion;._7t County Center at Chico, California. 6 Qa-'!-' Wintere, C' pi I';nia. All interested pg,� . . sons;,:are,�invited-1- to , 'review:;the documents; Wrpactten;comments. WHI be.," ceppted by tl� (Si lure) Planning Division at 04 - above:--address.. ;Ahy written comments on the °?:• I nitiaf.'e''SCiidy/M itigatd Negatiw'.' DeclaratigR must be.received.at the •.. .. above''address. :within the publicreview periot, ' ;If you,challenge tie , ... Initial Study/Mitigated Negatiye•AeclarationAh court;you.may be limn . ed to raising only'thos_,g issues: you:or someone.- els e.'' raised" in written correspondence` deliv- ered'to she,:Planning. Division:; The ;Butte. County,Planning'Conn rhission'will;hold a public heating on'this proji4 . the�date,'ti me;•and.loc& :ttoh of which has notyet been determined:. "Landowner§%within.300 . feet"'of. the;,proj'ect'site 1 i, receive; ,-'written `notice�as'ao. the:.date',;1_. ,time;:and.location of{the I +Planningi. 'Commission ' Jor,further;information regarding:-this.%project, please- contact.Stephen ' - - - 'Betts;project planner;at LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY A Ir� n PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 9 2004 FAX: (530)538-7785 September 8, 2004 CANKL.I VALLE:J`O CO Cl ERK . t nEpurr; BUT COUNTY-PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Butte County has prepared an Initial Study and is considering the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the following project: MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP Ronald & Claudine Laffins, Trustees, Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet. The proposed parcels are, and would continue to be, utilized for commercial uses. Proposed Parcel 1 would front on Esplanade, and proposed Parcel 2 would have access to Esplanade via a proposed 22-foot wide road easement across Parcel 1. The project site is located on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, at 2862 and 2866 Esplanade, Chico. APN 006-230-047 (SB) (File # TPM 04-13) The California Environmental Quality Act requires this notice to disclose whether any listed toxic sites are present on the project site. The project site does not contain a listed toxic site. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and reference documents for this project are on file for public review starting September 13, 2004, through October 12, 2004, at the Butte County Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. All interested persons are invited to review the documents. Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above address. Any written comments on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration must be received at the above address within the public review period. If you challenge the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division. The Butte County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on this project, the date, time, and location of which has not yet been determined. Landowners within 300 feet of the project site will receive written notice as to the date, time, and location of the Planning Commission hearing. For further inforniation regarding this project, please contact Stephen Betts, project planner, at (530) 538-7153. YVONNE CHRISTOPHER, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Monday, September 13, 2004. 205 � RAR 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO,CALIFORNIA 95973-5811 • TELEPHONE 530-895-1422 • FAX 530-895-1409 ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS CIVIL' ENGINEERS February 11, 2004 BUTTE Cour Mr. Stephen Betts FEB 112004 Senior Planner DEVELOPMENT Butte County Department of Development Services SERVICES 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR RONALD AND CLAUDINE LAFFINS ON A.P.N. 006-230-047, TPM 04-13 Dear Mr. Betts: In response to your letter of February 5, 2004, we have enclosed a copy of a letter from Butte County Environmental Health dated January 20, 2004 which is an updated Pre-Application for this site. They have removed the condition which required this subdivision to connect to the City of Chico sewer system for the reasons cited therein. We have reviewed Butte County Code Sections 20-4, 20-134 and 20-136 concerning exceptions to design requirements, minimum right-of-way widths and private easement as approved access and hereby request a design exception to allow proposed Parcel 2 to access the Esplanade via a 22.00 foot wide ingress and egress easement across proposed Parcel 1 on the basis that existing development affected the property and other special circumstances. When the existing auto repair shop and associated parking facilities were constructed, the entire frontage along the Esplanade was developed while leaving the back half of A.P.N. 006-230-047 vacant. We would further submit to you that it is not uncommon within commercial subdivisions to have various internal access, parking and utility easements or common areas without dedicated streets. Since this site is zoned C- General Commercial, we believe that the granting of our requested design exception would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the territory. Please feel free to contact us should questions arise or if additional information is needed to process this request. Sincerely, ROLLS, ANDERSON& ROLLS Kenneth G. Skillman III, P.E., P.L.S. cc: Ron Laffins T:\Data\PROJ ECTSW3184\Betts-021104.wpd s� • � � utte ount LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH 'DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 202 Mira Loma Drive . 411 Main Street E]7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 ��P.O.Box 5364 Oroville,CA 95965 TEL: (530)538-7282 Chico,CA 95927 TEL: (530)538-7281 FAX: (530)538-2165 TEL: (530)891-2727 FAX: (530)538-7785 January 20, 2004 FAX: (530)895-6512 Ron Laffins 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace Chico, CA 95928 JAN 2 2 2004 ROLLS ANDERSON RE: Pre-Application TPM 2862 Esplanade AP#006-230-047 Dear Mr. Laffins, This office has reviewed your application as indicated above. The following is an analysis of that review. Project: Split 0.82 acre lot into two lots, 18,025.5 sf and 16,913.7 sf. Location: 2862 Esplanade, Chico Applicant: Ron Laffins Report of Findings: The above 0.82 acre lot is located within the Nitrate Compliance Plan area in the City of Chico Sphere of Influence. The Nitrate Compliance Plan limits the discharge of wastewater to 334 gallons per day per acre. Discharge of wastewater is limited to 273.9 gallons per day for the original 0.82 acre lot. The water usage_analysis provided by Rolls, Anderson and Rolls is sufficient to explain that the high water usage on the original lot is due to the use of two evaporative cooling units in the summertime. Analysis of water use records and evaporative cooling data indicates that the average waste water discharge for the auto shop is between 50 and 100 gallons per day. With the proposed split, the front lot with the auto shop would be allowed a maximum of 130 gallons per day and the rear lot would be allowed a maximum of 138 gallons per day. Suggested Conditions: None. This review should not be construed as a blanket approval of your project since participation in the County Parcel Map process may change the project due to other agency requirements. When . you do apply for your map at the Planning Department, the remainder of your fee for r Page 2 January 20,.2004 Environmental Health services will be$49.50. However, you must have your Pre-Application Review receipt available at the time you make application. This letter concludes this Department's review of your pre-application. If you have any questions, please contact the Chico office listed above between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, l� Wendy M. Be tt, E.H.S. Division of Environmental Health WB/land/preapp/response2/2862 Espl anadeTPM Cc Rolls,Anderson and Rolls Attn: Ken Skillman L r ... 'eutte coun LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 'div +•' �`•' e 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 A TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 September 8, 2004 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Butte County has prepared an Initial Study and is considering the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the following project: MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP Ronald & Claudine Laffins, Trustees, Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet. The proposed parcels are, and would continue to be, utilized for commercial uses. Proposed Parcel 1 would front on Esplanade, and proposed Parcel 2 would have access to Esplanade via a proposed 22-foot wide road easement across Parcel 1. The project site is located on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, at 2862 and 2866 Esplanade, Chico. APN 006-230-047 (SB) (File# TPM 04-13) The California Environmental Quality Act requires this notice to disclose whether any listed toxic sites are present on the project site. The project site does not contain a listed toxic site. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and reference documents for this project are on file for public review starting September 13, 2004, through October 12, 2004, at the Butte County Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. All interested persons are invited to review the documents. Written , comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above address. Any written comments on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration must be received at the above address within the public review period. If you challenge the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division. The Butte County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on this project, the date, time, and location of which has not yet been determined. Landowners within 300 feet of the project site will receive written notice as to the date, time, and location of the Planning Commission hearing. For further information regarding this project, please contact Stephen Betts, project planner, at (530) 538-7153. YVONNE CHRISTOPHER, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Monday, September 13, 2004. 006-380-016 BETTY REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS TRUST 3634 BELL RD CHICO CA 95973 006-330-008 BROWN MARK A& LONNA S 3074 CORONADO RD CHICO CA 95973 006-350-053 BRUKEN LLC ETAL 1161 E 9TH ST CHICO CA 95928 006-230-037 BULLARD EMILY FRANCES TRUST 25 SANTOS WAY CHICO CA 95973 006-230-013 CASTALDO JOHN L ETAL 6 WILLIAMSBURG LANE CHICO CA 95926 006-330-007 COHEA WILLIAM NICKLAS 11408 37TH STREET YUMA AZ 85367 006-380-010 COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF BUTTE CO INC 2255 DEL ORO AVE OROVILLE CA 95965 006-230-027 D'AGOSTIN REYNOLD TIMOTHY ETAL 3483 HACKAMORE LN CHICO CA 95973 006-230-048 FONG FAMILY PARTNERSHIP 11 SANTOS WAY CHICO CA 95973 006-230-031 FONG HOWARD L &YEE Y 11 SANTOS WAY CHICO CA 95973 006-330-020 FOREMAN KENNETH C & PAMELA J 37 W ESTGROVE CT CHICO CA 95973 • 006-350-022 GREENBERG JAN REVOCABLE TRUST P O BOX 1317 ROGUE RIVER OR 97537 006-230-010 GRETHER JAMES B P O BOX 3722 CHICO CA 95927 006-350-021 HAHNE MAX& LORIE L 2875 LESTER CT CHICO CA 95973 006-230-044 HAMILTON DAVID ROSS 165 MANLEY CT SAN JOSE CA 95139 006-230-011 HARRASSER KEVIN & SANDRA J 1452 COLONIAL DR CHICO CA 95973 006-230-003 HUMBER HERBERT W SS 1675 ROLLINS RD#G BURLINGAME CA 94010 006-230-009 LACITINOLA PAUL ANGELO & SHAREN 847 GREENWICH DR CHICO CA 95926 006-230-046 LIGHTY MARK W &TERESA N P O BOX 899 ROUGH & READY CA 95975 006-330-009 MACMICHAEL GREGG H & LINDA A 900 LABURNUM AVE CHICO CA 95926 006-380-017 MIAN SERADJEDDIN 2912 ESPLANADE CHICO CA 95973 006-350-035 MORENA JUAN C & EVITA C PO BOX 6358 CHICO CA 95927 006-350-018 MORTON PHILLIP PATRICK 2863 ESPLANADE C CHICO CA 95973 006-350-036 ODONOGHUE JOSEPHINE 1926 BROADWAY CHICO CA 95928 006-330-021 REALE MICHAEL V&JANINE R 35 WESTGROVE CT CHICO CA 95973 006-230-035 ROBINSON FAMILY TRUST 33 PEBBLEWOOD PINES DR CHICO CA 95926 006-350-034 SILLACCI FAMILY TRUSST ETAL 200 STILSON CANYON RD#1 CHICO CA 95928 • 006-230-034 STEIGERWALD FAMILY TRUST 2788 IAN CT OAKDALE CA 95361 006-230-045 VALENCIA STEVE J & PAMELA J 3691 OAK RAVINE LN OROVILLE CA 95965 006-230-036 WALKER FAMILY LIVING TRUST 1300 HOWARD CT RED BLUFF CA 96080 006-380-015 WHITE FAMILY TRUST 778 EAST AVE CHICO CA 95926 �` ��� �" '•` ��` \\ \ 1.� •\:�c� \`�•/ \� � `'\ \`�e ._\ \ ••\'� // \j ,moi\ ��\ •\1 �' \ \ j/ :. \ '`� •:,���/ /, �4.'` .� d /\ \ � ,moi '� \.'@.`,_�•',�� // i `. '4. / I w Form A Notice of Completion & Environmental Document Transmittal Mail to: State Clearinghouse,PO Box 3044,Sacramento,CA 95812-3044 916/445-0613 SCH# Project Title: Laffins Tentative Parcel Map(TPM 04-13) Lead Agency: Butte County Contact Person: Stephen Betts Street Address: 7 County Center Drive Phone: (530)538-7153 City: Oroville Zip: 95965 County: Butte ————————————————————————————————————————— Project Location: County: Butte City/Nearest Community: Chico Cross Streets: Esplanade and East/West Lassen Zip Code: 95973 Total Acres: 0.8 Assessor's Parcel No. 006-230-047 Section: Twp. Range: Base: Within 2 Miles: State Hwy#: SR-99,SR-32 Waterways: Mud Creek,Keefer Slough,Sycamore Creek, Lindo Channel Airports: Chico Municipal Railways: UPRR Schools: Shasta Elem.,McManus Elem. ----------------------------------------- Document ---------------------------------------- Document Type: CEQA: ❑NOP ❑Supplement/Subsequent EIR NEPA: ❑NOI Other: ❑Joint Document ❑Early Cons (Prior SCH No.) ❑EA ❑Final Document ©Neg Dec ❑Other ❑Draft EIS ❑Other ❑Draft EIR ❑FONSI ----------------------------------------- Local---------------------------------------- Local Action Type: ❑General Plan Update ❑Specific Plan ❑Rezone ❑Annexation ❑General Plan Amendment ❑Master Plan ❑Prezone ❑Redevelopment ❑General Plan Element ❑Planned Unit Development ❑Use Permit ❑Coastal Permit ❑Community Plan ❑Site Plan 0 Land Division(Subdivision, etc.) ❑Other ————————————————————————————————————————— Development Type: ❑Residential: Units Acres ❑Water Facilities: Type MGD ❑Office: S9.ft. Acres Employees ❑Transportation: Type ©Commercial: Sgft. Acres Employees ❑Mining: Mineral ❑Industrial: Sgft. Acres Employees ❑Power: Type Watts ❑Educational ❑Waste Treatment: Type ❑Recreational ❑Hazardous Waste: Type ❑Other: ----------------------------------------- Funding ---------------------------------------- Funding(approx.): Federal $ 0.00 State $ 0.00 Total $ 0.00 ————————————————————————————————————————— Project Issues Discussed in Document: ©AestheticNisual ©Flood Plain/Flooding ❑X Schools/Universities ©Water Quality ©Agricultural Land ©Forest Land/Fire Hazard ©Septic Systems ©Water Supply/Groundwater Q Air Quality ❑X Geologic/Seismic X❑Sewer Capacity ©Wetland/Riparian ©Archeological/Historical ©Minerals ©Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading ©Wildlife ❑Coastal Zone ©Noise ©Solid Waste ©Growth Inducing Q Drainage/Absorption ©Population/Housing Balance ©Toxic/Hazardous ❑X Landuse ❑Economic/Jobs ❑X Public Services/Facilities ©Traffic/Circulation ©Cumulative Effects ❑Fiscal ©Recreation/Parks ©Vegetation ❑Other ————————————————————————————————————————— Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Designation: Commercial/C-2/Commercial ————————————————————————————————————————El Project Description: Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 0.8-acre parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet(0.39 acres)and one parcel of 18,025 square feet(0.41 acres). Revised 3-31-99 23 �a Reviewing Agencies Checklist Form A,continued KEY Resources Agency S=Document sent by lead agency Boating&Waterways X=Document sent by SCH ✓=Suggested distribution Coastal Commission Coastal Conservancy Colorado River Board Environmental Protection Agency Conservation Air Resources Board Fish&Game California Waste Management Board Forestry&Fire Protection SWRCB: Clean Water Grants Office of Historic Preservation SWRCB: Delta Unit Parks&Recreation SWRCB:Water Quality Reclamation Board SWRCB:Water Rights S.F.Bay Conservation&Development Commission Regional WQCB# S ) Water Resources(DWR) Youth &Adult Corrections Business,Transportation & Housing Corrections Aeronautics California Highway Patrol Independent Commissions &Offices Energy Commission V"CALTRANS District# 73 Department of Transportation Planning(headquarters) Native American Heritage Commission Public Utilities Commission Housing&Community Development Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Food &Agriculture State Lands Commission Health &Welfare Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Health Services State &Consumer Services Other General Services OLA(Schools) ----------------------------------------- Public Review Period(to be filled in by lead agency) Starting Date September 13, 2004 I Ending Date October 12, 2004 Signature o �' { � "� Date September 8, 2004 ----------------------------------------- Lead Agency(Complete if applicable): For SCH Use Only: Consulting Firm: Rolls Anderson&Rolls Address: 115 Yellowstone Drive Date Received at SCH City/State/Zip: Chico,CA 95973 Date Review Starts Contact: Kenneth Skillman, P.E.,P.L.S. Date to Agencies Phone:(_530 ) 895-1422 Date to SCH Clearance Date Notes: Applicant- Ronald&Claudine Laffins,Trustees Address: 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace City/State/Zip: Chico,CA 95928 Phone: (-530 ) 894-1603 g•��~ sem~ k .,� •�. 'eatte (0aft .. - LAND OF NATURAL V/ EALTH AND BEAUTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ❑202 Mira Loma Drive .Li l 411 Main Street 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 P.O.Box 5364 Oroville,CA 95965 TEL: (530)538-7282 Chico,CA 95927 TEL: (530)538-7281 FAX: (530)538-2165 TEL: (530)891-2727 FAX: (530) 538-7785 January 20, 2004 FAX: (530)895-6512 Ron Laffins 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace Chico, CA 95928 JAN 2 2 2004 ROLLS ANDERSON RE: Pre-Application TPM 2862 Esplanade AP#006-230-047 €: Dear Mr. Laffins, This office has reviewed your application as indicated above. The following is an analysis of that review. Project: Split 0.82 acre lot into two lots, 18,025.5 sf and 16,913.7 sf. Location: 2862 Esplanade, Chico Applicant: Ron Laffins Report of Findings: The above 0.82 acre lot is located within the Nitrate Compliance Plan area in the City of Chico Sphere of Influence. The Nitrate Compliance Plan limits the discharge of wastewater to 334 gallons per day per acre. Discharge of wastewater is limited to 273.9 gallons per day for the original 0.82 acre lot. The water usage analysis provided by Rolls, Anderson and Rolls is sufficient to explain that the high water usage on the original lot is due to the use of two evaporative cooling units in the summertime. Analysis of water use records and evaporative cooling data indicates that the average waste water discharge for the auto shop is between 50 and 100 gallons per day. With the proposed split, the front lot with the auto shop would be allowed a maximum of 130 gallons per day and the rear lot would be allowed a maximum of 138 gallons per day. Suggested Conditions: None. This review should not be construed as a blanket approval of your project since participation in the County Parcel Map process may change the project due to other agency requirements. When you do apply for your map at the Planning Department, the rem n r rA rEe lorV , a JAN 2 7 2004 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVIli4' e�. ,. ..... _[fes,��� �`!._ � � �R J � w w+�� �,riA1�t �..^-.�...-Y.... , Page 2 January 20, 2004 Environmental Health services will be $49.50. However, you must have your Pre-Application Review receipt available at the time you make application. This letter concludes this Department's review of your pre-application. If you have any questions, please contact the Chico office listed above between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Wendy M. Be tt, E.H.S. Division of Environmental Health WB/land/preapp/response2/2862Espl anadeTPM Cc Rolls,Anderson and Rolls Attn: Ken Skillman f BUTTE COUNTY JAN 2 7 2004 DEVELOPMENT 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO,CALIFORNIA 95973-5811 • TELEPHONE 530-895-1422 • FAX 530-895-1409 ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS CIVIL ENGINEERS January 26, 2004 Planning Division Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 SUBJECT. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 04-13 Dear Planner: The above referenced Tentative Parcel Map was submitted on January 15, 2004. Since that time, the Division of Environmental Health of the Department of Public Health has issued a revised analysis for their Pre-Application review of this site (a copy is enclosed). Please insert this letter and the revised Pre-App. into your TPM 04-13 file. Sincerely, ROLLS, ANDERSON& ROLLS Kenneth G. Skillman III, P.E., P.L.S. cc: Ron Laffins TADaMPROJECTS\031640anning012604.wpd Butte County Department of Development Services PLANNING DIVISION °�V T lF° 7 County Center Drive o 0 Oroville,CA 95965 0 0 o _wr_ _ o (530)538-7601 Telephone - -_. (530)538-7785 Facsimile ° ° January 23,2004 CDU N'�y TO: ENTER AGENCY/DEPARTMENT FROM: Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Ronald & Claudine Laffins, Trustees, Tentative Parcel Map - TPM 04-13 APN: 006-230-047 DATE OF IDR: 2/4/2004 IDR RESPONSE REGARDING COMPLETENESS OF.APPLICATION DUE BY: February 2, 2004 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS/MITIGATION MEASURES DUE BY: February 19, 2004 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, to be determined at the Inter-Departmental Review (IDR) Committee meeting on 2/4/2004, and/or to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map application to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet PROJECT LOCATION: on the east side of the Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, at 2862 Esplanade, Chico COUNTY SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO.: 3 ZONING: C-2 (General Commercial) GENERAL PLAN: C (Commercial) If a response cannot be submitted prior to the due dates listed above,please call Stephen Betts at (530) 538-7153 or send him an e-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for 5/27/2004 before the Planning Commission. IDR COMMITTEE — APPLICATION COMPLETE: ❑ No (Please send response to sbetts@buttecounty.net by February 2, 2004 ) ❑ Yes (Conditions/mitigation measures due by February 19, 2004) K:\Planning\Proj ects\CommentRequestForm.dot Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services 0�u T rF 0 YVONNE CHRISTOPHER,DIRECTOR 0 0 0 0 7 County Center Drive 0 - - - 0 Oroville,CA 95965 00 (530)538.7601 Telephone (530)538.7785 Facsimile CDU Nt ADMINISTRATION*BUILDING*GIS*PLANNING January 26, 2004 Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace Chico, CA, 95928 Re: Tentative Parcel Map, TPM 04-13,APN 006-230-047 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Laffins: In an effort to keep our customers informed, we are notifying all applicants of the current status of their application and assigned Planner. Your project is being reviewed for completeness and has been assigned to Stephen Betts. Mr. Betts can be reached at 538-7153, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Should you have any questions regarding your application,please call the planner listed above. Sincerely, Roni Thornton LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: TPM 04-13 APN: 006-230-047 APPLICANT: Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace Chico, CA 95928 OWNER: Ronald J. and Claudine J. Laffins, Trustees REPRESENTATIVE: Kenneth G. Skillman III, P.E., P.L.S. REQUEST: Tentative Parcel Map application to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet LOCATION: on the east side of the Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, at 2862 Esplanade, Chico SIZE: 34,939 square feet (0.8 acre) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT# 3 EXISTING ZONING: C-2, (General Commercial) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: C (Commercial) ZONING HISTORY: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: ASSIGNED PLANNER: Stephen Betts Date Application Received 1/15/2004 Date Project Assigned 1/20/2004 30 Day Complete 2/13/2004 Preset Hearing Date 5/27/2004 "DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: AP#-A::-) APPLICANT: (iVQ.cfiG>��) OWNER: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSED REQUEST: (to be filled out by 2erson taking in application) 'r4di ste parcc-1 +0 Aivicie a 3y,Q34 s�• F4. Pg(-Ce-1 o $ 0,-'\C- Qat -e\ 04 tlo,q%4 a� -cel ,4 FINAL REQUEST: (to be filled out by project planner) SIZE: `1}43�1 S9 ��. / O• g P�c1 LOCATION: Or ate* Side_ 04 t 5 (araee- QW-10110.^q�e� S'10 cxc- o-q- La 5,fe-v-\ Nve 2 lv 2 'C SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT# EXISTING ZONING: G--2 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: C Ow•v�,.tre.�Q ASSIGNED PLANNER: PLANNERS INITIALS Date Application Received Date Project Assigned 041-210,16$4 30 Day Complete Preset Hearing Date 11af2 ad vZ//L S 1 ,� , i t � 1 i � .. '� f COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST County Offices and Cities: Chief Administrative Officer X Develop.Services Director X Public Works Director X Environmental Health X Assesor Building Manager _Sheriff BCAG _ALUC X LAFCo ' Air Quality Mgmt. Butte Co.Farm Bureau Biggs _Gridley Chico _Oroville _Paradise Chico Airport Commission Information Systems Dept. —Animal Control X Agricultural Commission X County Counsel Irrigation District: _Butte Water —Biggs/W.Gridley Water _Durham Irrigation _OWID _Paradise Irrigation _Richvale Irrigation _Table Mountain Irrigation _Thermalito Irrigation _Other ` Domestic Water _Butte Water District California Water Service Co. _Del Oro Water Co. _OWID _Thermalito Irrigation District _Other Sewer _Butte Water District _Themalito Irrigation _Sterling City Sewer Main Skansen Subdivision(CSA 21) _L.O.A. PUD Fire Protection X California Department of Forestry _EI Medio Fire Protection District Recreation Districts _Chico Area Recreation _Durham Area Recreation _Feather River Rec.&Park Paradise Recreation&Park Richvale Recreation &Parks Utilities _PG&E North-Chico _Chambers Cable TV _Pacific Bell PG&E South-Oroville Viacom Cable TV State Agencies CalTrans(Traffic) _Dept.of Water Resources Dept.of Fish and Game _Forestry(Attn:Craig Carter) _Dept of Parks and Rec. _Highway Patrol Central Reg.Water Quality Cont. _Caltrans,Aeronautics Program _Off.of Governmental&Env.Relations _Department of Conservation _Off.of Mining Reclamation Dept.Social Services,Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies _US Forest Service _US Bureau of Land Management _US Fish&Wildlife Service Army Corps of Engineers _National Marine Fisheries Sservice Other Districts,Agencies,Committees,etc. _Lime Saddle Dist _Community Association School Districts _Drainage _Butte Env.l Council _Reclamation _Cal Native Plant Society _Butte Co.Mining Committee _Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. _Butte Ck.Watershed Conservancy _Mosq.Abatement.Oroville/Butte Co K:\Planning\Forms\DISTR.wF Pagel of 2 Betts, Steve From: Houx, Mary Anne Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 2:22 PM To: Christopher, Yvonne Cc: Betts, Steve Subject: RE: Reminder about District 3 projects (Houx) Yvonne and Steve, Thank you for this information. I just drove out there. I question why the county is developing this, even tough it is in the unincorporated area. The soils are pretty poor and don't handle septics very well. For health reasons, anyone along there should be on the sewer. On the corner of East Lassen and the Esplanade is a Chinese restaurant whose owners also own several apartment houses to its East and North. We almost closed down the restaurant over sanitation as the owners used the lot you say is being developed as a "sewer pond". The reason there appear to be berms on this "vacant lot" is that is how they held the sewage and prevented it from running onto the Esplanade. This is in the area of"Concern"and this project should be shared with the City of Chico. Mary Anne Houx -----Original Message----- From: Christopher, Yvonne Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 6:49 PM To: Houx, Mary Anne Subject: FW: Reminder about District 3 projects (Houx) For your information, Yvonne -----Original Message----- From: Betts, Steve Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 1:53 PM To: Christopher, Yvonne Cc: Baker, Joseph Subject: RE: Reminder about District 3 projects (Houx) We received a new Tentative Parcel Map project today that is in District 3. The project would divide a 34,939 sq. ft. parcel into one parcel of 16,914 sq. ft. and one parcel of 18,025 sq. ft. The project site is located on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 570 north of Lassen Avenue, at 2862 Esplanade, Chico. The project site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial)and has a Commercial.General Plan land use designation. The site is already developed with an automotive repair business, and a swimming pool contractor business is currently being constructed. The project is new, so it has not yet been assigned to a planner. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 1/16/2004 • Page 2 of 2 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk- (530) 538-7153 Fax —(530)538-7785 -----Original Message----- From: Christopher, Yvonne Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 1:33 PM To: Development Services Cc: Houx, Mary Anne Subject: Reminder about District 3 projects (Roux) I previously asked,that staff keep me apprised of any projects in Supervisor Houx's district. She asked that I keep her informed. While I provide monthly reports to each of the supervisors regarding specific permit activity (planning and building), she is interested in anything in her district. Thanks for helping me provide her this information, Yvonne 1/16/2004 RAR 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO,CALIFORNIA 95973-5811 • TELEPHONE 530-895-1422 • FAX 530-895-1409 ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS CIVIL ENGINEERS E Cr, 'E O U January 12, 2004 D JAN 1 5 2004 Mr. Cliff Bottenfield, R.E.H.S. Butte County Department of Public Health BUTTE COUNTY Division of Environmental Health PLANNING DIVISION P.O. Box 5364 Chico, CA 95927 SUBJECT: PRE-APPLICATION TPM 2862 ESPLANADE A.P. #006-230-047 Dear Mr. Bottenfield: After reviewing your letter of December 29, 2003 concerning the above referenced Pre- . Application, we obtained copies of Superior Auto's water usage records for the last 6 years (copy enclosed) to check the daily usage amounts presented in your letter and to analyze seasonal fluctuations of their usage in the hope of determining water usages which do not affect the septic systems. Our calculations derived an annual water usage for 2003 of 8,200 cubic feet (61,340 gallons) which equates to 168 gallons/day; however, we noted a 600% to 700% increase in summertime usage (relative to winter) which seems exceptionally dramatic for a site that only has a small landscape strip along its frontage. Similarly, 2002 data showed an annual usage of 13,000 cubic feet (97,247 gallons) which equates to 266 gallons/day; this time the summertime fluctuation was.approximately 500% to 600%. We then contacted the applicant, Mr. Ron Laffins, to inquire if he knew of any reason for the substantial seasonal fluctuation. He did not know of any but he had me contact Mr. Gary Biertell.. of Superior Auto to continue the inquiry. Mr. Biertell's immediate response to the seasonal fluctuations was to explain that their shop utilizes two large evaporative coolers which use a lot of water. I also asked if they had irrigated any other grass/landscape areas around the site which he answered in the negative. To my question, "Was there any particular aspects of their auto shop tasks which might cause a seasonal increase in water usage?"; he answered that the only thing might be a bit more washing down of client's vehicles in the summer. Using his responses, I attempted to find some quantitative data on evaporative cooler water consumption on the internet. I was surprised to discover numerous articles, studies and brochures out of Arizona, New Mexico and Texas on this subject. I have enclosed copies of two documents which cite evaporative cooler water consumption at"16.2 gal./hr." (For a particular model) and "up to 500 gal./day," respectively. T9Data\PRCU ECT510J 194\Bonennem-011204.wpd ., t, ��� � . ��; _ 1 �_ S...e.1 � 1 .,ray , � January 12, 2004 Mr. Cliff Bottenfield SUBJECT. PRE-APPLICATION TPM 2862 ESPLANADE A.P. #006-230-047 Page Two Once again reviewing the Superior Auto water usage data, we derived a baseline monthly usage (when the evaporative coolers are not operating) to be between 200 cubic feet (11496 gallons/month or 50 gallons/day) and 400 cubic feet (2,992 gallons/month or 100 gallons/day) which seems reasonable for a corresponding wastewater flow for a business of this size. Subtracting the 100 gallons/day of wastewater flow for.Superior Auto from your figure of 273.9 g.p.d. for nitrate compliance still leaves 173.9 g.p.d. for the swimming pool contractor's shop building. Using 20 gallons of wastewater per employee per day for the new building results in an estimated flow per day of 100 gallons and an estimated total for the entire site of 200 gallons per day. We respectfully request that you reevaluate your findings for the Pre-Application for 2862 Esplanade in light of the new information related to the evaporative coolers used by Superior Auto. Should you require additional information or clarification concerning this request, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ROLLS, ANDERSON& ROLLS Kenneth G. Skillman III, P.L, P.L.S. cc: Ron Laff ins, Owner/Applicant Joe Baker, County Planning T:1Dala1PR0.1ECTS1091841Bottenlleld-011204.wpd Enter Financial Information - Inquiry-Premise Consumption History - - -- File-.. Edit View Go' Favorites Use Inquiry :Review `Reports`' Help Prem Conslumption Premise 2862 Esplanade Chico CA 959730217-'Commercial Premise ID: 8613277777 ,$# Unit Of Measure: +� 100 cubic feet of water ry �- Yeai Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun' Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov. Dec 1` 2003 2 2 2 2 4 13 11 12 11 `14 `7 2 ...................... 22002 3 . : 4 2 3 17 16 16 16 `14 18 7 ;•..•......•...... 14 4 y4 Q ar.. �,.:... A. ..• ... { :. ............:............o. 3- 2001 5 12 20 11 14 12 11 13 12 12 10 1 ....... ........ ........ 42000 2 6 4 11 16 21 16 16 15 15 2 2 ..... ..,,r ... - .. .... ..... .. ¢ -b- ...._....q.,.. p.......................... S{ 3 1999 .2 3 .:. 3 2 11 18: :.20 18 19 25'.. .'.7 3 w. . .... ., 6 1998 3 9 6; 4 4 17 71 56 56 62 -32 3 J • �x f r ,Home Energy: Making a habit of Habitat: th4Vight have been som... http://www.fmdartic om/cf dls/mOKXA/5_20/108266468/p5/arti... 5oksmart• - Home Submit a Site DIRECTORX- ARTICLES SEARCH all magazines FOR ?;,Seareh ' Advanced Search Help 'OU ARE HERE: Articles > Home Energy > Sept-Oct, 2003 > Article ........................._............_..............................._...................._................................................................................._......................__.._......._...........-_......._.......__......................__........._......................_.........--........_................... Print article QTell a friend M Find subscription deals Sponsored Links Ads by Google Making a habit of Habitat: there might have been some bumps along the way, but a collaboration between a nonprofit, a builders Maryland Duct association, and a major building supply company yielded some Cleaning efficient, comfortable, and affordable results. Discount Duct Home Energy, Sept-Oct, 2003, by Daran Wastchak cleaning service in DC, Maryland and Continued from page 4 Virginia HewsCarpetCare.com As a member of the local host committee for the EEBA conference, and as the liaison between Habitat and the EEBA team, I can accept responsibility Air Duct Cleaning for some of EEBA's insensitivity. In hindsight, we should have done a better NJ &NY job of communicating directly with the Habitat board of directors about what Commercial& we were hoping to accomplish. In addition, we should have better Residential HVAC system cleaning& understood and accepted the scheduling uncertainties that Habitat was mold remediation facing with completing their drawings and getting them approved by the www.myducts.com city. Handling this issue differently could have made the experience more positive for both Habitat and EEBA. Lastly, even though EEBA had partnered with Habitat in other cities as part of its annual conference, this does not Duct Cleaning mean that EEBA should expect to be automatically accepted with open arms Franchise by every and any Habitat affiliate. That was what it had expected, obviously, Patented in Phoenix. equipment,unique sales program,full Making a Habit of Energy Star training. http://www.Franchise Doct I am proud to be working with Habitat for Humanity in Phoenix. And I am very pleased that it has made the full commitment to build all of its homes to the Energy Star standard, demonstrating that energy-efficient, high-quality construction is obtainable in the affordable housing sector. We hope that other Habitat affiliates around the country, perhaps with the encouragement and assistance of the national organization, will follow Phoenix's example and strive for the Energy Star designation. A/C Versus Evaporative Cooling In 1995, the Arizona Department of Commerce Energy Office began to work with Habitat for Humanity in Phoenix, Arizona, to assist with energy audits Content provided in and diagnostics to determine potential upgrades for Habitat's house designs. partnership with Major issues found were duct leakage and room pressure imbalances. Most TwoMSC3N of the duct leakage was through the barometric damper on the dual A/C evaporative cooling system, which shared the same ductwork. GALE A major obstacle to removing the evaporative cooler was the misconception that affordable housing must have evaporative cooling.To overcome this, the Energy Office presented data collected from the local electric utility, Arizona Public Service (APS), and the results of their own computer analysis (using CALRES, an hourly simulation software).The cost of a dual cooling system was compared with the cost of A/C alone; the comparison included the cost of water usage and duct leakage through the evaporative cooler's 1 of 4 1/12/2004 10:00 AM Home Energy- Making a habit of Habitat:thght have been som... http://www.findarticiom/cf dls/mOKXA/5_20/108266468/p5/arti.... damper while the A/C system was running.The results showed negligible net savings when considering a 12-SEER heat pump (see Table A). Savings from evaporative cooling is further eroded in the summer during the rainy season,when humidity makes evaporative cooling ineffective and A/C is' used instead. If one factors in the cost of maintaining the evaporative cooler and the cost of repairing damage to the roof from water runoff, the dual cooling system is not cost-effective. Table A. A/C-Evaporative Cooler Savings over Heat Pump-Only Systems Heat Pump-- Annual Leakage Net Payback Cooler Combination Savings Cost Savings (Yrs) 8.5-SEER heat pump $116 $53 $63 19 10-SEER heat pump $ 77 $46 $31 39 12-SEER heat pump $ 42 $38 $ 4 300 Notes: Annual Savings is the savings realized when changing from a heat pump only system to a heat pump and evaporative cooler combination system (APS study) . Cooler is aspen pad evaporative cooler (installed cost: $1,200) . Cooler water usage: 16.-2 gal/h_, Cooler operating hours: cooler only = 2,005, with heat pump = 1,384. Water cost per year: cooler only = $53.85, with heat pump = $37.13. Leakage Cost assumes 280 (CFM.sub.25] leakage at barometric damper. Table 1.A Comparison of Design Features South Ranch Home Depot- Energy Improved "Standard" Star Standard Design Design Design HVAC Tight duct system no yes no Separate ducts for evap and AC no yes no Ducts in conditioned space no no no Evaporative cooler yes yes yes 12-SEER heat pump yes yes yes Room pressure relief (jump ducts/transfer grilles) no yes no Fresh-air system (at return) no no no Insulation Framing ready for insulation (capped soffits, chases) no yes no 2 of 4 1/12/2004 10:00 AM . dome Fnergy:Making a habit of Habitat: ght have been som... http://www:fmdartic om/cf dls/mOKXA/5_20/108266468/p5/arti... Correctly installed insulation (no gaps, voids, misalignment) no yes no Fiberglass batt insulation in walls yes no yes Blown insulation in walls (fiberglass or cellulose) no yes no Envelope air sealing no yes yes Low-e glass no yes yes ENERGY STAR water heater no yes no Third-party testing and inspections during construction no yes no, Number of Homes Built to Each Standard 174 2 20 Villas Esperanza Home Depot- EEBA Energy Building Star America HVAC Tight duct system yes yes Separate ducts for evap and AC no no Ducts in conditioned space no yes Evaporative cooler no no 12-SEER heat pump yes yes Room pressure relief (jump ducts/transfer grilles) no yes Fresh-air system (at return) no yes Insulation Framing ready for insulation (capped soffits, chases) yes yes Correctly installed insulation (no gaps, voids, misalignment] yes yes Fiberglass batt insulation in walls yes no Blown insulation in walls (fiberglass or cellulose) no yes Envelope air sealing yes yes Low-e glass yes yes ENERGY STAR water heater yes yes Third-party testing and inspections during construction yes yes Number of Homes Built to Each Standard 94 1 Habitat For Humanity "Standard" Design Features: * Slab-on-grade * 2 x 4 wood frame walls 3 of 4 1/12/2004 10:00 AM Home energy: Making a habit of Habitat: ght have been som... http://www.findarti om/cf dls/mOKXA/5_20/108266468/p5/arti... * Asphalt shingle roof * Dual-pane clear-glass windows, aluminum frames * R-13 fiberglass batt insulation in walls " * R-30 fiberglass blown insulation in attic * Ducts in unconditioned attic, R-4.2 insulation * Evaporative cooler on roof * 12-SEER heat pump packaged unit on roof -- ......................................_..........._........................._....._..........._................................_......................................._....._........ u Previous 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 6 Next p RELATED TERMS i Animals Habitations Phoenix Arizona Energy usage Phoenix Arizona Homes and haunts `-DIRECTORY y WEB < ARTICLES SEARCH all magazines FOR :; Search Advanced Search • Help ©2003 LookSmart, Ltd.All rights reserved.-About Us•Advertise with Us•Advertiser Log-in • Privacy Policy•Terms of Service 4 of 4 1/12/2004 10:00 AM ,services;-Utility Billing-High Bill //www.scottsdaleaz.gov/utilities/highbill.asp .r.' .n.."A' "'r.'Y R:TG�.'R'....Xxiesu,:-aenx:.:e:.eca--;;:,ci'ews:�sex_;. i :nx.:'x::'.e.:xzs:xx: .,x:..vS"-e:;x.e.+.. .-.— x..e•as -stanR::--.sn-!evc?. 'x?"" � .—e"rT _s. _..r s: '.�. ..:as'"....K ..xa.x' .:v xs; .moi --",a_ :rd... Home I Events I Jobs I Services I Departments I Report a Problem Search Transportation, Streets & Utilities Utility Billing Related Links High Water Usage? Payment Options There are several possible reasons for this. Pay Your Water Bill LANDSCAPING Online Start/Stop/Change Water consumption may increase in the summer months because of the hotter, Service drier weather. If your bill is unusually high, it may be due to your landscape Locations watering. Make sure the timers on your automatic sprinklers are not set for too long or too often. For maximum savings, minimum pruning, and optimum plant Drop Box Locations health, adjust the amount of water according to temperature, humidity and rainfall Deposits at least four times a year. After a power outage, recheck the settings on your Frequently Asked timers. Watering your lawn during the coolest and calmest part of the day Questions minimizes water loss due to evaporation and wind. Very early morning or after Billing Terms sunset are the best times to water. The Weather page of your local newspaper lists the amount of water needed weekly to maintain your lawn. You can also call Scottsdale Cares Water Conservation at 480-312-5690 for a lawn watering guide or answers to your Customer Survey questions. Wastewater(Sewer) If you water manually, take care not to overwater. A standard hose can use as Adjustment Form much as 20 gallons of water per minute. A hose left on by mistake can waste as (pdf/121 kb/2 pages) much as 28,000 gallons in 24 hours! Don't water sidewalks or streets. DO A METER TEST To determine whether you have a leak, you can do a meter test. Go out to your meter. (Most meter boxes are out by the sidewalk and level with the ground directly in front of the property.) Using a screwdriver or stick, slide the meter box lid off. You will see a glass dial similar to a clock face. There will be an odometer style dial and a clock hand. Write down the positions of both. (Some meters also have a small triangle on the dial face as well. If this triangle is moving when you are not knowingly using water, this is your first indication that you may have a leak.)Visually inspect the sprinkler system both when it's on and off. First, make sure the reading on the odometer dial is higher than the reading given on your latest bill. If the odometer reading is lower, then your meter was misread. (This happens less than 1 percent of the time, but does happen.) If your reading is lower, call us at 480-312-2461. After reading the meter,.use no water for at least two hours. (You can read the meter just before you leave the house for work or to go grocery shopping or do the test overnight for more accurate results). Take a second reading. If you used no Water, the two readings should be the same. If the reading has changed or the sweep hand or triangle have moved, something on the property may be pulling water through the meter. FINDING THE PROBLEM If your meter does show usage on the meter test, finding the problem is the responsibility of the property owner. But we can suggest some places to look. An underground leak may not be apparent on the surface. Much of Scottsdale sits on very porous ground. Instead of causing puddles on the surface, the water drains quickly, then follows the slope of the ground along sidewalks, into gutters and storm drains. Instead of puddles or soggy spots, look for areas of lusher grass, unexpected vegetation or dark spots on the ground resulting from fungus 1 of 3 1/12/2004 10:09 AM Services Utility Billing-High Bill //www.scottsdaleaz.gov/utilities/highbill.asp growth. A toilet running continuously can use as much as 4,000 gallons of water per day! Even a slow, silent leak can add gallons to your bill. Put a few drops of food coloring in the tank and see if it seeps through to the bowl. If it does, replace the flapper valve and/or the rubber gasket at the bottom of the tank. If your toilet is an older model and you wish to replace it, call Water Conservation at 480-312-5690 for information on plumbing rebates for water-saver toilets. Make sure all your faucets turn off completely. Even a slow drip can use as much as 5,000 gallons a month. A steady stream can mean an increase of up to 21,000 gallons a month on your billing statement. Kn evaporative cooler can,use as much as_500_gallons of water per day if its' . doesn t havea_recirculation_pump._Even_if.,there is_a recirculation pump, the water? Level float can stick;causing water to run out the overflow. Water softeners,water filters, water heaters, and automatic pool fillers also have water level floats that can stick open. (This may not be apparent if the overflow is piped into the drains.) If you suspect one of these appliances is the problem, turn it off and redo the meter test. If the usage stops, you have identified the source. An automatic pool filler can disguise any problems you might have with the pool. Occasionally, shut the filler off and see if the pool level drops more than it would with normal evaporation. For example, a pool 20'wide and 40' long will lose an average of 3500 gallons of water per month to evaporation. (This is a yearly average and will be higher in the summer and lower in the winter.)That would result in a seven inch drop in pool level in a month or about 1/4" per day. Use your meter to help you manage your water. Read your meter before and after different water activities such as irrigating your lawn, filling your pool, washing your car, or doing a load of laundry or dishes. For instance, determine the water consumption used when you water your yard. Multiply that by the number of times you water per month. This shows you what portion of your monthly water bill is used on your lawn. METER FIELD TEST If you have done the leak check and feel the problem is with the meter, call us. We can have your meter field tested for accuracy. However, once a meter begins to fail, it usually reads less water, not more. Please note that there is a $15.00 US charge for the test if the meter is accurate. Please check all your other options before asking for the field test. If you have a leak at your water meter or wish to report a leak on City property, please call Water Operations at 480-312-5650. To report leaks on private property or abuses of water use, please call Code Enforcement at 480-312-2546 or the Police Department at 480-312-5000. If you would like more information about conserving water, desert landscaping, workshops or rebates please call Water Conservation at 480-312-5690. Your sewer rate is based on your water consumption in the prior December, January, and February. If you have a leak or refill your pool during those months, you need to fill out a sewer adjustment form. If you disagree with your sewer amount or would like to request a sewer adjustment form, please call our Water Resources Department at 480-312-5688. Questions concerning garbage and brush pickup, recycling, reducing waste, or container repair can be answered by Solid Waste at 480-312-5600. More info... For questions about a delinquent amount on your bill, please call Revenue Recovery at 480-312-2705. For questions about your bill, please call Utility Billing at 480-312-2461. Top of Page 2 of 3 1/12/2004 10:09 AM .Services`Utility Billing-High Bill //www.scottsdaleaz.gov/utilities/highbill.asp Was this page useful to you? Yes I No Reading the PDF documents,provided on this site, Thank you for visiting our site. requires the Adobe Acrobat Reader,available for free from y g Adobe (link to Adobe.com). Financial Services welcomes your feedback. Adobe,the Adobe logo,Acrobat,and the Acrobat logo are Web Policies& Disclaimers trademarks of Adobe Systems incorporated. © 1995-2004 City of Scottsdale.All Rights'Reserved. 3 of 3 1/12/2004 10:09 AM Sent .�y: BUTTE- CO ENVIRONMENEALTH; 530 695 •6512; Ja04 10:OOAM; Page 2/3 i ut a 01M LAND OF NATURAL ' WEALTH ANE) BEAUTY i DEPARTMENT OF PLIBUC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH j []202 Mira Loma Drive LV411 Main Street E]'i County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 P.O,Box 5364 Oroville,CA 95965 j TEL: (530)538-7282 Chico,CA 95927 TEL: (530)538.7281 FAX; (530)538.2165 TEL: (530)891-2727 FAX: (530)538-7785 I FAX: (530)895.6512 December 29,2003 i Ron Laffins 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace I Chico,CA 95928 I RE: Pre-Application TPM 2862 Esplanade AP#006-230-047 I j Dear Mr. Laffins, This office has reviewed your application as indicated above. The following is an analysis of that review. Project: Split 0.82 acre lot into two lots,18,025.5 sf and 16,913.7 sf. Location: 2862 Esplanade,Chico I Applicant: Ron Laffins i . Report of Findings: The above 0.82 acre lot is located within the Nitrate Compliance Plan area in the City of Chico Sphere of Influence. The Nitrate Compliance Plan limits the discharge of wastewater to 334 gallons per day per acre. Due to the size of the above lot, idischarge of wastewater is limited to 273.9 gallons per day. Analysis of water use records i for the existing auto shop indicated that the average usage for 2002 was approximately 181 gallons per day,2003 was approximately 261 gallons per day. With the proposed split,the auto shop produces wastewater that greatty exceeds the new limit of 136.9 gallons per day, based on the lot size of.41 acre. City of Chico sanitary sewer now exists in front of the jproperty on the Esplanade. I • Suggested Conditions: Connect parcels 1 &2 to Cl of Chico sanitary sewer. gg p City m'Y _gent By: BUTTE CO ENVIRONMENT ALTH; 530 695 6512; Ja04 10:OOAM; . Page 3/3 Page 2 December 29,2003 This review should not be construed as a blanket approval of your project since participation in the County Parcel Map process may change the project due to other agency requirements. When you do apply for your map at the Planning Department,the remainder of your fee for Environmental Health services will be$49.50. However,you must have your Pre-Application Review receipt available at the time you make application. This letter concludes this Department's review of your pre-application. If you have any questions,please contact the Chico office listed above between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.'m.,Monday through Friday-. Sincerely, Cliff Bo field,R.E.H.S. Division of Environmental Health C131Wand/pmapp/rtsponse/2862EspbnadeTPM - SentikBy: BUTTE CO ENVIRONMENTA LTH; 530 895 6512; Nov 00 10:18AM; Page 2/3 E f15BUTTE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT JDIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Main St. , P O Box 5364, Chico, CA 95927-5364 (916) 891-2727 FAX (916) 895-6512 BUTTE COUNTPLANNING DIVISIPRE-APP REVIEW (Please check appropriate box) j TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION X TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT i USE PERMIT OTHER Location of Property 2862 Esplanade Assessor's Parcel Number: - 006-230-047 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Parcel -map to spl i t property into two commercial parcels with existing "Superior Auto" on the south parcel and a swimming pool company on the north parcel . The swimming pool company's septic system -has been constructed; See attached copy of the Inspection Certificate. ��__=====a=�zG1==��.�=3�xm�QJ■eaIDSmoz-=zxaea ss s4 sees at#Rrrr:�rraesam�ra��� Applicant. Ron Laffins Phone No: (530) 894-1603 Address: 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace,- Chico, CA 95928 Ronald J. Laffins, Sr. & Claudine J. Laffins, owner: Trustees of the* Phone No: (530) 894-1603 Address: 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace, Chico, C_ A_ 95928 Kenneth G. Skillman III P.E. , P:L.S. Engineer "or Surveyor: Rol l s, Anderson t Roll s Phone No.. (530) 895-1422 >d Address: 115 Yellowstone Drive, Chico, CA 95973-5811 Rolls, Anderson & Rolls Mail correspondence to: 115 Yellowstone gyri ve,- Chico, CA 95973-5811 Signature Date 0 ms�swassaama:massosarrr�+ rrrr.ewrwrs�s�r=rrrrreaaesra�mamz=za=zar�raar:ai VV HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE ONLY FEE PAID $ Health Department Receipt No. Date Sanitarian Reviewing Application *Ronald J. Laffins, Sr. & Claudine J. Laffins Trust dated 17 February, 2000, as the sole and separate property of Ronald J. Laffins, Sr. BCPRSAPI �1 �-, ;.�� t� � �� ��� . j� �� f ;• �.q :v BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH �- DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SEPTIC SYSTEM INSPECTION CERTIFICATE P. 0. BOX 5364 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95927 OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 TEL: (530) 891-2727 TEL: (530) 538-7281 The Sewage Disposal System was inspected at. a �S'StJ�GC i7 u G,� SEPTIC TANK LEACHING FIELD O Size SO Gallons Length /1;2 69 feet S Material "7 Width inches No. of lines Qj Rock Under Pipe inches G 1 The above dimensions meet the minimum requirements of Butte County Code,Chapter 19. Additional leaching area will be required if experience shows it to be necessary. Remarks: Date: S2-778R(Rev.4/98) ENVIPONMENTAL HEALTR-SP_kCIALIST s r i TY F BUTTE COON O39144 OFFICIAL RECEIPT OFFICE OR DEPARTMENT ISSUING RECEIPT Received from The Sum of �� ��.3�•S� For ,e W ()() 6 —oZ Received: , Received By CASH ❑ Title CHECK 1 O`50 By D 0 BUSINESS FORMS•(530)743.8511 Fam 75702 X+41 F3 17- its/ COUNTY OF BUAILPARTMENTiV DEVELOPMENT SEAS- BUILDING DIVISION 7 County Center Drive • Oroville, California 95965 • Telephone (530) 538-7 4 K)5jgT NO. (Rev.12/96) APPLICATION AND PERMIT ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER ZOMNa BUILDING PERMIT OWNER Te&HOUE SO. FT. OCC, BUILDING VALUATION I891-5387 .OWNERS MNUNO ADORMS . 82 FATRWAY DE, Q4TM s CONTRACTOR'S NAME TELEPHONE 988 my oo T) CONTRACTOR'S AO 779 FN CONSTRUCTION LENDER LEmER•s LoA No ADDRESSLq Fir@p{flce Total Valuation Is ARCHrECT OR ENGINEER LICENSE . Filing Fac $ 20.00 ARCHNTECT OR ENGINEERS MAILING ADDRESS I JAN 1 5 2004 I l Permit Fee $ 912.50 V Plan Checking Fee $ eULDING ADORESS 4%2FSPIMADE, CH Energy Plan Checking Fee $ 46,00 BUTTE COUNTY $ RI 4101111l; r i PERMIT FEE $ 1571.63 LOT no. SUBDIVISIONSNAME• I AP 1 PLUMBING PERMIT Filing Fee 20.00 USEOFSTRUCTURE Each Trap 6 7.00 42.00 Solar or heat pump water heater 23.00 SF Cl Duplex ❑ Mobilehome ❑ Other CG S' Water piping 15.00 19.00 Each as water heater or vent 15.00 TYPE OF WORK Gas piping system i •5 outlets 15.00 New ❑ Addition ❑ Remodel ❑ UbHes ❑ Installation ❑ Other ❑ Building sewer 15.00 Describe Work: METAL OFFICEAZ/REHOUSE BUILDING Mobile Home ISIG W (0 20.00 ' PERMIT FEE S ELECTRICAL PERMIT Filing FC;31 20.00 Main Service °=oaLsSS 23.00 LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION Main Service EE TO 48.00 CONS DWEWNC OCCUCUP. 3 5¢50. I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter OR ADONS. a ACC.8LOS. Fr. e(commencing with Section 7000)of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, rNioNRr°s+o.' MVL"O1lRGT @T.50 1 and my license Is in full force and effect. G � POWERPAAAT APus License Class/ Llc.Na 3� ! O sr ctEo arL OurLeT OR FIMRES AL 6 1.50 OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION Ex. Occup. �• ,,E I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am exempt from the Contractors License. Ex. Occu . oFvnETSA�o�eA 5.00 Law for the following r6asom Temporary Service 23.00 ❑ I,as owner of the property.or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, Mobile Home Facilities 20.00 will do the work,and the structure Is not intended or offered for sale, ❑ I, as owner of the property,am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors Misc. Wiring 23.00 to construct the project. - ❑ 1 am exempt under Sec. , Business and Professions Code for this PERMIT FEES reason joir; nn WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION MECHANICAL PERMIT Filing Fee 20.00 1 hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: Heating ❑ 1 have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' Coolln compensation, as provided for by section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is lasued. Hood 6.50 I have and will malnWn workers'compensation Insurance,as required by Section Ventilation 3700 of the Labor Code,for the performance of work forwhich this permit is Issued. My workers' compensation Ins �� C,durance carrier and policy�}umb r are: Carrier 1144 ro c ui zy� !z /,--- PERMIT FEES Policy Number f1R�,Z-7.2-2. Mobile Home Installation Fee $ (The above sections need not be completed Ifthe permit is for work of evaluation Energy Inspection Fee I $ of one hundred dollars ($100) or less.) c s rr c 0 1 certify that In the performance of the work for which this permit Is Issued, I shall d TOTAL FEE$ not employ any person In any manner so as to become subject to workers' IiA 0.PE v,P cDP AR P HD ssuE compensation laws nla,and agree that if I should become subject to the VIV workers' co sation prow i ns of section 3700 of the Labor Code, I shall fort nply with those prov ions. This permit Is hereby Issue under the applicable provisions g/ Cg of the Butte County Code and/or Resolutions to do work X Date �U/ indicatedy above for which fees have been paid. Signature p ' n en �-- An OSHA permit is required for excav I ns over 5'0"deep and demolition or construction 1 4M ' 2103 of structures over 3 stories In height. By / ate ReceiptNo, n fi r PERMIT EXPIRES ON WHITE-0.0.6 A FPf- PINK-INSPECTORG l 0ENR00-APPLICANT m._, -. _;' G'� V �u J _.� _. . , , � ,, EXHIBIT Bi�i BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH r- DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SEPTIC SYSTEM INSPECTION CERTIFICATE P. O. BOX 5364 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95927 OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965 TEL: (530).891-2727 TEL: (530) 538-7281 The Sewage Disposal System was inspected at �s'ct,/GLi1 a G�e FOR/'.? f r;��o rr�.n/ is ro h/✓� ���> .`yL:�� O SEPTIC TANK LEACHING FIELD G Length /c� feet Size /1-25D Gallons 9 � Material /�/�rz r%r..� 7�' Width 7 inches Q— No. of lines Rock Under Pipe inches Y The above dimensions meet the minimum requirements of Butte County Code,Chapter 19. Additional leaching area will be required if experience shows it to be necessary. ,J Remarks: Date: S2-778R(Rev.4/98) ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-SPECIAUST c � BidwS_ll CffiCO • OROVILLE P� ID E GRLEY 500 Wall St. 1835 Robinson St. 7126A Skyway 560 Kentucky Title & PO Box 5173 PO Box 811 PO Box 490 PO Box 949 Escrow Chico, CA 95927 Oroville,CA 95965 Paradise, CA 95967 Gridley,CA 95948 (530) 894-2612 (530) 533-2414 (530) 877-6262 (530) 846-4005 FAX(530) 894-0713 FAX(530) 533-1589 FAX(530) 872-5129 FAX(530) 846-0584 Since 1913 Date: September 29, 2003 ' Order No. 00207794 -099 Ron Laffins RE: Limited Coverage/Laffins In connection with above referenced escrow,we enclose the following checked items: ❑ Preliminary Report— Q UPDATED LOT BOOK GUARANTEE ❑ Buyer's Escrow Instructions R1 COPY OF NEW DEED OF TRUST ❑ Seller's Escrow Instructions ❑ ❑ Grant Deed ❑ ❑ Deed of Trust and Note ❑ ❑ Preliminary Report Approval ❑ ❑ Copy of Note ❑ ❑ Preliminary Change of Ownership ❑ ❑ Escrow Funds Notice ❑ Special Instructions RD EC E 0 V JAN 15 S4 BUTTE COUNTY Sincerely, PLANNING DIVISION BIDWELL TITLE&ESCROW COMPANY Mike Boulant/MG 500 Wall St.,Chico,CA 95927 Phone:(530)894-2612 — Fax:(530)894-0713 BTEC/enclose v AL SCHEDULE A UPDATED Guarantee No.: G 1578-28261 Your Ref.: LAFFINS Our No.: 00207794-099 DRK Liability: $1,000.00 Fee: $250.00 Dated: 02/24/2003 at 07:30 A.M. The assurances referred to on the face page are: That,according to the Company's property records relative to the following described real property(but without examination of those Company records maintained and indexed by name): SEE EXHIBIT C ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF A. The last recorded instrument purporting to transfer title to said real property is: By Quitclaim Deed From Ronald J. Laffins,a married man as his separate property In favor of Ronald J.Laffins, Sr.and Claudine J.Laffins,Trustees of The Ronald J.Laffins, Sr.&Clauidine J. Laffins Trust dated 17 February,2000,as the sole and separate property of Ronald J. Laffins, Sr. Recorded on June 13,2000 Recorded in Butte County Official Records Serial No. 2000-21758 B. There are no mortgages or deeds of trust which purport to affect said real property,other than those shown below under Exceptions. No guarantee is made regarding(a)matters affecting the beneficial interest of any mortgage or deed of trust which may be shown herein as an Exception, or(b)other matters which may affect any such mortgage or deed of trust. No guarantee.is made regarding any liens,claims of lien,defects or encumbrances other than those specifically provided for above, and,if information was requested by reference to a street address,no guarantee is made that said real property is the same as said address. EXCEPTIONS 1. A Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness in the original amount shown below: Dated July 22,2003 Trustor Ronald J. Laffins Sr.and Claudine J. Laffins Trustees of the Ronald J.Laffins Sr. and Claudine J. Laffins . Trust dated February 17,2000 Trustee Mid Valley Title and Escrow Company Beneficiary Butte Community Bank Amount $296,250.00 Recorded on July 25,2003 Recorded in Butte County Official Records Serial No.200348886 The amount due,terms and conditions of the indebtedness should be determined by contacting the owner of the debt. LOT BOOK GUARANTEE LOTBK t Guarantee No.: G 1578-28261 Order No.: 00207794 SCHEDULE C THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL .PROPERTY SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL I: A PORTION OF LOT 2, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED, "OFFICIAL MAP OF ESMERA.LDA", WHICH.MAP WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON MARCH 5, 1888, IN BOOK 1 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 33, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT AN:IRON PIPE MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, AND. RUNNING THENCE NORTH 52° 39' EAST, 290.4 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE LEAVING THE LAST MENTIONED LINE, SOUTH 37° 21' EAST, 230.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58° 33' WEST, 291.95 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE THEREON SOUTH 37° 21' EAST, 200 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 370 21' WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, 200 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM A PORTION OF LOT 2 OF THE ESMERALDA TRACT,ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL MAP ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED MARCH 5, 1888 IN BOOK 1 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 33, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMM:ENCI.NG AT AN IRON PIPE,MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SOUTH 37° 21' 00" EAST, 120.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE FROM SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 370 21-' 007 EAST, 80.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE GIFT DEED TO EVERETT B.BEICH AND VERNON L. BEICH, DATED JANUARY 7, 1981., AND RECORDED IN BOOK 2585 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BUTTE COUNTY AT PAGE 614; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID BEICH PARCEL, NORTH 580 33' 00" EAST, 291..95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 370 21' 00" WEST 110.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 520 39' 00"WEST 290.40 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. AP NO. 006-230-047 PARCEL II: AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OF-THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND: .0 Guarantee No.: G 1578-28261 Order No.: 00207794 SCHEDULE C (CONTINUED) A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH LYING EASTERLY OF AND COINCIDENT TO THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT AN IRON PIPE, MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED, "OFFICIAL MAP OF ESMERALDA",WHICH . MAP WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON MARCH 5, 1888,IN BOOK 1 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 33; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SOUTH 37° 2.1'00"EAST 120.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, FOR THE LINE HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE FROM SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 37°21' 00" EAST, 60.00 FEET. LOTS 2 6, ESMERA LDA TRACT: 06-23 38 39 S 520 .K Npf7N1K1pl10/t 660 29Q4 L7B6 6601 1I5?1 1174 J1024 -- 144.65 7.1211 -. .. . b h /609 0 0 136.6 m L20A `I I ` '® O I 140 O 1 1 - /9 39 I I 60 O I 1 © v O I I I I to is z2 Q i ?O I V � q • QI R 1 I 44 no I 31 14 290.4_ J .6 Q I 160 I I70 4 1 10.34Avh ( m 1 cl ti 3 ry 1 y i 13 a k 99 i CO' Z h 49 N 1 h K 1 emy /4 4/ Z 1 1.64 AC 5SL6 N I O 1 \ I 1 ti I 18 C/) v I 10.31 AC 1 � O I m 290.4 99 J \ 99 172 EAST LASSEN AVE 04 Assessor's Map No. 06-23 County of Butte, Calif. . BRM J NEYSEO: 4.BB i This map may or may not be a survey of the land depicted hereon. You should not rely upon it for any purpose other than orientation to the general location of the parcel or parcels depicted. BIG' ELL" 1 FLE & ESCROW t1u., expressly disclaims any liability for -:llepcd I/jss or damage �.vhir.I1 r•n!!!1 onn!t frnm ralinnr.c, my +Itis ryinn BIDWELL TITLE &ESCROW COMPANY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY,STEWART TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA,INC. . Privacy Policy Notice Purpose of This Notice. Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act(GLBA)generally prohibits any financial institution,directly or through its affiliates,from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices,such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA,we are providing you with this document,which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of Bidwell Title&Escrow Company and Stewart Title Guaranty Company,Stewart Title Insurance Company,Stewart Title Of California,Inc. We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources: • Information we receive from you,such as on applications or other forms. • Information about your transactions we secure from our files,or from our affiliates or others. • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. • Information that we receive from others involved In your transaction,such as the real estate agent or lender. Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice,no additional nonpublic personal information will be collected from you. We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law., We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the following types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we have joint marketing agreements: • Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking,consumer finance, securities and insurance. • Non-financial companies such as envelope stuffers and other fulfillment service providers. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical,electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. BTEC/preprivacy RECORDING REQ Jill 111111111111111111111111111111 MlpYpt,t,>E'f?I? 8003-0048886 RECORDATION REQUESTED 8Y: Recorded I REC FEE 37.00 Butte Community Bank Official Records I CHICO OFFICE Count Of 1 2041 FOREST AVE BUTTE CHICO,CA 95928 CANDACE J. GRUBBS I Recorder WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: ROSEMARY DIMON i Butte'Community Bank Assistant I Kathy CHICO OFFICE 0SMAM 25-Jul-2003 1 Page 1 of 11 2041 FOREST AVE CHICO,CA 95928 SEND TAX NOTICES TO: Butte Community Bank CHICO OFFICE 2041 FOREST AVE WIC0,CA 9S928 FOR RECORDE_R'iE ONLY DEED OF TRUST Variable Interest Rate Revolving Line of Credit THIS DEED OF TRUST is dated July 22, 2003, among RONALD J. LAFF(NS SR, and CLAUDINE J. LAFFINS TRUSTEES of the RONALD J. LAFFINS SR. AND CLAUDINE J. LAFFINS TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 17, 2000; whose address is 3255 CANYON OAKS TERRACE, CHICO, CA 95928 ("Trustor"); Butte Community Bank, whose address is CHICO OFFICE, 2041 FOREST AVE, CHICO, CA 95928 (referred to below sometimes as ' 4ender and sometimes as "Beneficiary"); and MID VALLEY TiTLE AND ESCROW COMPANY, whose address is 601 MAIN STREET, CHiCO,.CA 95928 (referred to below as "Trustee"). CONVEYANCE AND GRANT. For valuable consideration,Trustor Irrevocably grants,transfers and assigns to Trustee In trust,with power of sale,for the benefit of Lender as Beneficiary,all of Trustor's right,title,and interest In and to the following described real property,together with all existing or subsequently erected or affixed buildings, Improvements and fixtures;all easements, rights of way,and appurtenances;all water,water rights and ditch rights(including stock in utilities with ditch or Irrigation rightsr);and all other rights,royalties,and profits relating to the reef property,Including without limitation all minerals,oil,gas,geothermal and similar matters,(the "Real Property")located In BUTTE County, State of Californla: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF The Real Property or Its address is commonly known as 2862 ESPLANADE , CHiCO, CA 95973. The ASsessor's Parcel Number for the Real Property Is 006-230-047-000 REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT. Specifically,In addition to the amounts specified in the indebtedness definition,and without limitation, this Deed of Trust secures a revolving fine of credit,which obligates Lender to make advances to Trustor so long as Trustor complies with all the terms of the Note. Notwithstanding the amount outstanding at any particular time, this Deed of Trust secures the total amount of the Note. The unpaid balance of the revolving line of credit under the Note may at certain times be Zero Dollars($9.00). A zero balance does not affect Lender's agreement to make advances to Trustor under the Note. Therefore,Lender's Interest under this Deed of Trust will remain In full force and effect notwilhstanding a zero balance on the Note. Trustor presently assigns to Lender(also known as Beneficiary in this Deed of Trust)at(of Trustor's right,title,and Interest In and to all present and future leases of the Property and all Rents from the Property. This Is an absolute assignment of Rents made in connection with an obligation secured by real property pursuant to California Civil Code Section 2938. In addition, Trustor grants to Lender a Uniform Commercial Code security Interest In the Personal Property and Rents. THIS DEED OF TRUST, INCLUDING THE ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND THE SECURITY INTEREST IN THE RENTS AND PERSONAL PROPERTY,IS GIVEN TO SECURE (A) PAYMENT OF THE INDEBTEDNESS AND (B) PERFORMANCE OF ANY AND ALL OBLIGATIONS OF THE TRUSTOR UNDER THE NOTE,THE RELATED DOCUMENTS,AND THIS DEED OF TRUST. THIS DEED OF TRUST IS GIVEN AND ACCEPTED ON THE FOLLOWING TERMS: PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE. Except as otherwise provided in this Dead of Trust,Trustor shall pay to Lender all amounts secured by this Deed of Trust as they become due,and shall strictly and In a timely manner perform all of Trustor's obligations under the Note,this Deed of Trust, and the"Related Documents. POSSESSION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPERTY. Trustor agrees that Trustor's possession and use of the Property shall be governed by the following provisions: Possession and Use. Until the occurrence of an Event of Default,Trustor may (1) remain in possession and control of the Property; (2) use,operate or manage the Property;and (3) collect the Rents from the Property. Duty to Maintain. Trustor shall maintain the Property in tenantable condition and promptly perform all repairs, replacements, and maintenance necessary to preserve Its value. DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 2 Compliance With Environmental Laws. Trustor represents and warrants to Lender that: (1) During the period of Trustor's ownership of the Property,there has been no use,generation,manufacture,storage,treatment,disposal,release or threatened release of any Hazardous Substance by any person on,under,about or from the Property; (2) Trustor has no knowledge of,or reason to believe that there has been, except as previously disclosed to and acknowledged by Lender In writing, (a) any breach or violation of any Environmental Laws, (b) any use;generailon, manufacture,storage,treatment,disposal,release or threatened release of any Hazardous Substance on, under,about or from the.Property by any prior owners or occupants of the Property,or (c) any actual or threatened litigation or claims of any kind by any person relating to such matters;and (3) Except as previously disclosed to and acknowledged by Lender In writing, (a) neither Trustor nor any tenant,contractor,agent or other authorized user of the Property shall use,generate,manufacture,store,treat,dispose of or release any Hazardous Substance on,under,about or from the Property;and (b) any such activity shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable federal,state,and local laws,regulations and ordinances,including without ilmltation all Environmental Laws. Trustor authorizes Lender and Its agents to enter upon the Property to make such Inspections and tests, at Trustor's expense, as Lender may deem appropriate to determine compliance of the Property with this section of the Deed of Trust. Any Inspections or tests made by Lender shall be for Lender's purposes only and shall not be construed to create any responsibility or liability on the part of Lender to Trustor or to any other person. The representations and warranties contained herein are based on Trustor's due diligence in investigating the Property for Hazardous Substances. Trustor hereby (1) releases and waives any future claims against Lender for Indemnity or contribution in the event Trustor becomes liable for cleanup or other costs under any such laws;and (2) agrees to Indemnify and hold harmless Lender against any and all claims,losses,liabilities,damages,penalties,and expenses which Lender may directly or Indirectly sustain or suffer resulting from a breach of this section of the Deed of Trust or as a consequence of any use, generation, manufacture, storage, disposal, release or threatened release occurring prior to Trustor's ownership or interest in the Property,whether or not the same was or should have been known to Trustor. The provisions of this section of the Deed of Trust,Including the obligation to Indemnity,shall survive the payment of the Indebtedness and the satisfaction and reconveyance of the lien of this Deed of Trust and shall not be affected by Lender's acquisition of any interest In the Property,whether by foreclosure cr otherwise. Nuisance,Waste. Trustor shall not cause,conduct or permit any nuisance nor commit,permit,or suffer any stripping of or waste on or to the Property or any portion of the Property. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,Trustor will not remove, or grant to any other party the right to remove,any timber,minerals(Including oil and gas),coal,clay,scoria,soil,gravel or rock products without Lender's prior written consent. Removal of Improvements.Trustor shall not demolish or remove any Improvements from the Real Property without Lender's prior written consent. As a condition to the removal of any Improvements,Lender may require Trustor to make arrangements satisfactory to Lender to replace such Improvements with Improvements of at least equal value. Lender's Right to Enter. Lender and Lender's agents and representatives may enter upon the Real Property at all reasonable times to attend to Lender's interests and to Inspect the Real Property for purposes of Trustor's compliance with the terms and conditions of this Deed of Trust. Compliance with Governmental Requirements. Trustor shall promptly comply with all laws,ordinances,and regulations,now or hereafter In effect,of alt governmental authorities applicable to the use or occupancy of the Property,Including without Ilmitation,the Americans With Disabilities Act. Trustor may contest in good faith any such law,ordinance,or regulation and withhold compliance during any proceeding, including appropriate appeals,so long as Trustor has notified Lender In writing prior to doing so and so long as,In Lender's sole opinion, Lender's interests in the Property are not Jeopardized. Lender may require Trustor to post adequate security or a surety bond,reasonably satisfactory to Lender,to protect Lender's Interest. Duty to Protect. Trustor agrees neither to abandon or leave unattended the Property. Trustor shall do all other acts, in addition to those acts set forth above In this section,which from the character and use of the Property are reasonably necessary to protect and preserve the Property. DUE ON SALE-CONSENT BY LENDER. Lender may,at Lender's option,declare immediately due and payable all sums secured by this Deed of Trust upon the sale or transfer,without Lender's prior written consent,of all or any part of the Real Property,or any Interest In the Real Property. A"sale or transfer"means the conveyance of Real Property or any right,title or Interest In the Real Property;whether legal,beneficial or equitable; whether voluntary or Involuntary;whether by outright sale,deed,installment sale contract,land contract,contract for deed,leasehold Interest with a term greater than three (3)years, lease-option contract, or by sale, assignment, or transfer of any beneficial interest in or to any land trust holding title to the Real Property, or by any other method of conveyance of an interest in the Real Property. However,ihls.option shall not be exercised by Lender If such exercise is prohibited by applicable law. TAXES AND LIENS. The following provisions relating to the taxes and liens on the Property are part of this Deed of Trust: Payment. Trustor shall pay when due(and In all events at least ten (10)days prior to delinquency)all taxes,special taxes,assessments, charges(Including water and sewer),fines and Impositions levied against or on account of the Property,and shall pay when due all claims for work done on or for services rendered or material furnished to the Property. Trustor shall maintain the Property free of all liens having priority over or equal to the Interest of Lender under this Deed of Trust,except for the lien of taxes and assessments not due and except as otherwise provided In this Deed of Trust. Right to Contest. Trustor may withhold payment of any tax,assessment,or claim in connection with a good faith dispute over the obligation to pay,so long as Lender's Interest In the Property is not Jeopardized. If a lien arises or is filed as a result of nonpayment.Trustor shall within fifteen(15)days after the lien arises or,if a Ilan Is flied,within fifteen(15)days after Trustor has notice of the filing,secure the discharge of the Ilan,or if requested by Lender,deposit with Lender cash or a sufficient corporate surety bond or other security satisfactory to Lender In an amount sufficient to discharge the lien plus any costs and attorneys'fees,or other charges that could accrue as a result of a foreclosure or sale under the lien. In any contest,Trustor shall defend Itself and Lender and shall satisfy any adverse Judgment before enforcement against the Property. Trustor shall name Lender as an additional obligee under any surety bond furnished In the contest proceedings. Evidence of Payment. Trustor shall upon demand furnish to Lender satisfactory evidence of payment of the taxes or assessments and shall authorize the appropriate governmental official to deliver to Lender at any time a written statement of the taxes and assessments against the Property. Notice of Construction. Trustor shall notify Lender at least fifteen(15)days before any work is commenced,any services are furnished,or DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 3 any materials are supplied to the Property,If any mechanic's lien,materialmen's lien,or other lien could be asserted on account of the work, services,or materials. Trustor will upon request of Lender furnish to Lender advance assurances satisfactory to Lender that Trustor can and will pay the cost of such Improvements. PROPERTY DAMAGE INSURANCE. The following provisions relating to Insuring the Property are a part of this Deed of Trust. Maintenance of insurance. Trustor shall procure and maintain policies of fire Insurance with standard extended coverage endorsements on a replacement basis for the full insurable value covering all Improvements on the Real Property in an amount sufficient to avoid application of any coinsurance clause,and with a standard mortgagee clause in favor of Lender. Trustor shall also procure and maintain comprehensive general liability Insurance In such coverage amounts as Lender may request with Trustee and Lender being named as additional Insureds in such liability Insurance policies. Additionally,Trustor shall maintain such other insurance, including but not limited to hazard, business Interruption,and boiler Insurance,as Lender may reasonably require. Notwithstanding the foregoing,In no event shall Trustor be required to provide hazard Insurance In excess of the replacement value of the Improvements on the Real Property. Policies shall be written in form, amounts,coverages and basis reasonably acceptable to Lender and Issued by a company or companies reasonably acceptable to Lender. Trustor,upon request of Lender,will deliver to Lender from time to time the policies or certificates of insurance in form satisfactory to Lender, Including stipulations that coverages will not be cancelled or diminished without at least ten (10)days prior written notice to Lender. Each Insurance policy also shall include an endorsement providing that coverage In favor of Lender will not be Impaired In any way by any act, omission or default of Trustor or any other person. Should the Real Property be located In an area designated by the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency as a special flood hazard area,Trustor agrees to obtain and maintain Federal Flood Insurance,if available, within 45 days after notice Is given by Lender that the Property is located In a special flood hazard area,for the full unpaid principal balance of the loan and any prior liens on the property securing the loan,up to the maximum policy limits set under the National Flood Insurance Program,or as otherwise required by Lender,and to maintain such insurance for the term of the loan. Application of Proceeds. Trustor shall promptly notify Lender of any loss or damage to the Property. Lender may make proof of loss If Trustor falls to do so within fifteen(15)days of the casualty. If In Lender's sole judgment Lender's security interest in the Properly has been Impaired,Lender may,at Lender's election,receive and retain the proceeds of any insurance and apply the proceeds to the reduction of the. Indebtedness,payment of any lien affecting the Property,or the restoration and repair of the Property. If the proceeds are to be applied to restoration and repair,Trustor shall repair or replace the damaged or destroyed Improvements In a manner satisfactory to Lender, Lender shall,upon satisfactory proof of such expenditure,pay or reimburse Truslor from the proceeds for the reasonable cost of repair or restoration If Trustor Is not in default under this Deed of Trust. Any proceeds which have not been disbursed within 180 days after their receipt and which Lender has not committed to the repair or restoration of the Property shall be used first to pay any amount owing to Lender under'thfs Dead of Trust, then to pay accrued Interest,and the remainder,If any,shall be applied to the principal balance of the Indebtedness. If Lender holds any proceeds after payment in full of the Indebtedness, such proceeds shall be paid to Trustor as Trustoes interests may appear. Trustor's Report on Insurance. Upon request of Lender,however not more than once a year,Trustor shall furnish to Lender a report on each existing policy of Insurance showing: (1) the name of the Insurer, (2) the risks insured; (3) the amount of the policy; (4) the property insured,the then current replacement value of such property,and the manner of determining that value;and (5) the expiration date of the policy. Trustor shall, upon request of Lender,have an Independent appraiser satisfactory to Lender determine the cash value replacement cost of the Property. LENDER'S EXPENDITURES. if any action or proceeding Is commenced that would materially affect Lender's Interest in the Property or M Trustor fails to comply with any provision of this Deed of Trust or any Related Documents,Including but not limited to Trustoes failure to discharge or pay when due any amounts Trustor Is required to discharge or pay under this Deed of Trust or any Related Documents,Lender on Trustoes behalf may(but shall not be obligated to)take any action that Lender deems appropriate,including but not limited to discharging or paying ail(axes, liens,security interests,encumbrances and other claims,at any time levied or placed on the Property and paying all costs for Insuring,maintaining and preserving the Property. All such expenditures incurred or paid by Lender for such purposes will then bear Interest at the rate charged under the Note from the date Incurred or paid by Lender to the date of repayment by Trustor. All such expenses will become a part of the Indebtedness and,at Lender's option;will (A) be payable on demand; (B) be added to the balance of the Note and be apportioned among and be payable with any Installment payments to become due during either (1) the term of any applicable Insurance policy;or (2) the remaining term of the Note;or (C) be treated as a balloon payment which will be due and payable at the Note's maturity. The Deed of Trust also will secure payment of these amounts. Such right shall be In addition to all other rights and remedles to which Lender may be entitled upon Default. WARRANTY;DEFENSE OF TITLE. The following provisions relating to ownership of the Property are a part of this Deed of Trust: Title. Trustor warrants that: (a)Trustor holds good and marketable Nile of record to the Property in fee simple,free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than those set forth in the Real Property description or in any title insurance policy, title report, or final title opinion Issued in favor of,and accepted by,Lender In connection with this Deed of Trust,and (b)Trustor has the full right,power,and authority to execute and deliver this Dead of Trust to Lender. Defense of Title. Subject to the exception In the paragraph above,Trustor warrants and will forever defend the title to the property against the lawful claims of all persons. In the event any action or proceeding is commenced that questions Trustor's titre or the Interest of Trustee or Lender under this Dead of Trust,Trustor shall defend the action at Trustor's expense. Trustor may be the nominal party in such proceeding, but Lender shall be entitled to participate in the proceeding and to be represented In the proceeding by counsel of Lender's own choice,and Trustor will deliver, or cause to be delivered, to Lender such Instruments as Lender may request from time to time to permit such participation. Compliance With Laws. Trustor warrants that the Property and Trustor's use of the Property compiles with all existing applicable laws, ordinances,and regulations of governmental authorities. Survival of Representations and Warranties. All representations,warranties,and agreements made by Trustor in this Deed of Trust shall survive the execution and delivery of this Deed of Trust,shall be continuing In nature,and shall remain in full force and effect until such time as Trustor's Indebtedness shall be paid in full. CONDEMNATION. The following provisions relating to eminent domain and Inverse condemnation proceedings are a part of this Deed of Trust: Proceedings, If any eminent domain or inverse condemnation proceeding Is commenced affecting the Property,Trustor shall promptly DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page a notify Lender in writing,and Trustor shall promptly take such steps as may be necessary to pursue or defend the action and obtain the award. Trustor may be the nominal party In any such proceeding,but Lender shall be entitled,at Its election,to participate In the proceeding and to be represented in the proceeding by counsel of Its own choice, and Trustor will deliver or cause to be delivered to Lender such Instruments and documentation as may be requested by Lender from time to time to permit such participation. Application of Net Proceeds. It any award Is made or settlement entered Into in any condemnation proceedings affecting all or any part of the Property or by any proceeding or purchase In Iieu of condemnation, Lender may at Its election, and to the extent permitted by law, require that all or any portion of the award or settlement be applied to the Indebtedness and to the repayment of all reasonable costs, expenses,and attorneys'fees Incurred by Trustee or Lender in connection with the condemnation proceedings. IMPOSITION OF TAXES,FEES AND CHARGES BY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES. The following provisions relating to governmental taxes, fees and charges are a part of this Deed of Trust: Current Taxes,Fees and Charges. Upon request by Lender,Trustor shall execute such documents In addition to this Deed of Trust and take whatever other action is requested by Lender to perfect and continue Lender's lien on the Real Property. Trustor shalt reimburse Lender for all taxes, as described below,together with all expenses Incurred In recording, perfecting or continuing this Deed of Trust, Including without limitation all taxes,fees,documentary stamps,and other charges for recording or registering this Deed of Trust. Taxes. The following shall constitute taxes to which this section applies: (1) a specific fax upon this type of Dead of Trust or upon all or any part of the Indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust; (2) a specific tax on Trustor which Trustor is authorized or required to deduct from payments on the Indebtedness secured by this type of Deed of Trust; (3) a tax on this type of Deed of Trust chargeable against the Lender or the holder of the Note;and (4) a specific taxon all or any portion of the Indebtedness or on payments of principal and Interest made by Trustor. Subsequent Taxes. If any tax to which this section applies is enacted subsequent to the date of this Deed of Trust,this event shall have the some effect as an Event of Default,and Lender may exercise any or all of Its available remedles for an Event of Default as provided below unless Trustor either (1) pays the lax before it becomes delinquent, or (2) contests the tax as provided above in the Taxes and Liens section and deposits with Lender cash or a sufficient corporate surety bond or other security satisfactory to tender. SECURITY AGREEMENT;FINANCING STATEMENTS. The following provisions relating to this Deed of Trust as a security agreement are a part of this Deed of Trust: Security Agreement. This Instrument shall constitute a Security Agreement to the extent any of the Property constitutes fixtures,and Lender shall have all of the rights of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code as amended from time to time. Security Interest. Upon request by Lender,Trustor shall execute financing statements and take whatever other action is requested by Lender to perfect and continue Lender's security Interest In the Rents and Personal Property. Trustor shall reimburse Lender for all expenses incurred in perfecting or continuing this security Interest. Upon default,Trustor shall not remove,sever or detach the Personal Property from the Property. Upon default,Trustor shall assemble any Personal Property not affixed to the Property in a manner and at a place reasonably convenient to Trustor and Lender and make it available to Lender within three(3)days after receipt of written demand from Lender to the extent permitted by applicable law. Addresses. The mailing addresses of Trustor(debtor)and Lender(secured party)from which information concerning the security Interest granted by this Deed of Trust may be obtained(each as required by the Uniform Commercial Code)are as stated on the first page of this Deed of Trust. FURTHER ASSURANCES;ATTORNEYAN-FACT. The following provisions relating to further assurances and attorney-In-fact are a part of this Deed of Trust: Further Assurances. At any time,and from time to time,upon request of Lender,Trustor'will make,execute and deliver,or will cause to be made, executed or delivered,to Lender or to Lender's designee, and when requested by Lender,cause to be filed, recorded,rafted, or rerecorded,as the case may be,at such times and In such offices and places as Lender may deem appropriate,any and all such mortgages, deeds of trust, security deeds, security agreements, financing statements, continuation statements, instruments of further assurance, certificates,and other documents as may,In the sole opinion of Lender,.be necessary or desirable in order to effectuate,complete,perfect, continue, or preserve (1) Trustor's obilgallons under the Note,this Deed of Trust,and the Related Documents, and (2) the hens and security Interests created by this Deed of Trust as first and prior liens on the Property,whether now owned or hereafter acquired by Trustor. Unless prohibited by law or Lender agrees to the contrary in writing,Trustor shall reimburse Lender for all costs and expenses Incurred in connection with the matters referred to In this paragraph. Attorney-in-Fact. If Trustor fails to do any of the things referred to in the preceding paragraph,Lender may do so for and In the name of Trustor and at Trustor's expense. For such purposes, Trustor hereby Irrevocably appoints Lender as Trustor's attorney-in-fact for the purpose of making,executing, delivering,fling,recording, and doing all other things as may be necessary or desirable,in Lender's sole opinion,to accomplish the matters referred to In the preceding paragraph. FULL PERFORMANCE. if Trustor pays all the indebtedness when due,and otherwise performs all the obligations Imposed upon Trustor under this Deed of Trust, Lender shall execute and deliver to Trustee a request for full reconveyance and shall execute and deliver to Trustor suitable statements of termination of any financing statement on file evidencing Lender's security interest In the Rents and the Personal Property. Lender may charge Trustor a reasonable reconveyance fee at the time of reconveyance. EVENTS OF DEFAULT. Each of the following,at Lender's option,shall constitute an Event of Default under this Deed of Trust: Payment Default. Trustor falls to make any payment when due under the Indebtedness. Other Defaults. Trustor fails to comply with or to perform any other term,obligation,covenant or condition contained in this Deed of Trust or In any of the Related Documents or to comply with or to perform any term, obligation, covenant or condition contained In any other agreement between Lender and Trustor. Compliance Default. Failure to comply with any other term,obligation,covenant or condition contained In this Deed of Trust,the Note or In any of the Related Documents. If such a failure Is curable and if Trustor has not been given a notice of a breach of the same provision of this DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 5 Deed of Trust within the preceding twelve(12)months,It may be cured(and no Event of Default will have occurred)If Trustor,after Lender sends written notice demanding cure of such failure: (a)cures the failure within fifteen(15)days;or (b)If the cure requires more than fifteen (16)days,Immediately Initiates steps sufficient to cure the failure and thereafter continues and completes all reasonable and necessary steps sufficient to produce compliance as soon as reasonably practical. Default on Other Payments. Failure of Trustor within the time required by this Deed of Trust to make any payment for taxes or Insurance,or any other payment necessary to prevent filing of or to effect discharge of any lien. False Statements. Any warranty,representation or statement made or furnished to Lender by Trustor or on Trustor's behalf under this Deed of Trust or the Related Documents is false or misleading In any material respect, either now or at the time made or furnished or becomes false or misleading at any time thereafter. Defective Collateralization. This Dead of Trust or any of the Related Documents ceases to be In full force and effect(Including fallure of any collateral document to create a valid and perfected security Interest or Ilen)at any time and for any reason. insolvency. The dissolution or termination of the Trust, the insolvency of Trustor, the appointment of a receiver for any part of Trustoes property, any assignment for the benefit of creditors, any type of creditor workout, or the commencement of any proceeding under any bankruptcy or insolvency laws by or against Trustor. Creditor or Forfeiture Proceedings. Commencement of foreclosure or forfeiture proceedings,whether by judicial proceeding,self—help, repossession or any other method, by any creditor of Trustor or by any governmental agency against any property securing the Indebtedness. This Includes a garnishment of any of Trustor's accounts,Including deposit accounts,with Lender. However,this Event of Default shall not apply If there is a good faith dispute by Trustor as to the validity or reasonableness of the claim which Is the basis of the creditor or forfeiture proceeding and if Trustor gives Lender written notice of the creditor or forfeiture proceeding and deposits with Lender montes or a surety bond for the creditor or forfeiture proceeding,In an amount determined by Lender,In Its sole discretion, as being an adequate reserve or bond for the dispute. Breach of Other Agreement. Any breach by Trustor under the terms of any other agreement between Truslor and Lender that Is not remedied within any grace period provided therein, including without limitation any agreement concerning any Indebtedness or other obligation of Trustor to Lender,whether existing now or later. Events Affecting Guarantor. Any of the preceding events occurs with respect to any Guarantor of any of the Indebtedness or any Guarantor dies or becomes Incompetent,or revokes or disputes the validity of,or liability under,any Guaranty of the Indebtedness. In the event of a death, Lender, at its option, may, but shall not be required to, permit the Guarantor's estate to assume unconditionally the oblIgatlons arising under the guaranty in a manner satisfactory to Lender,and,in doing so,cure any Event of Default. Adverse Change. A material adverse change occurs In Trustor's financial condition, or Lender believes the prospect of payment or performance of the Indebtedness is impaired. insecurity, Lender in good faith believes Itself Insecure. Right to Cure. If such a failure is curable and It Truslor has not been given a notice of a breach of the same provision of this Deed of Trust within the preceding twelve(12)months,it may be cured(and no Event of Default will have occurred)if Trustor,after Lender sends written notice demanding cure of such failure: (a)cures the fallure within.fifteen(15)days; or (b)if the cure requires more than fifteen(15)days, immediately Initiates steps sufficient to cure the failure and thereafter continues and completes all reasonable and necessary steps sufficient to produce compliance as soon as reasonably practical. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES ON DEFAULT. If an Event of Default occurs under this Deed of Trust,at any time thereafter,Trustee or Lender may exercise any one or more of the following rights and remedies: Election of Remedies. Election by Lender to pursue any remedy shall not exclude pursuit of any other remedy,and an election to make expenditures or to take action to perform an obligation of Trustor under this Deed of Trust,after Trustor's failure to perform,shall not affect Lender's right to declare a default and exercise Its remedies. Foreclosure by Sale. Upon an Event of Default under this Deed of Trust,Beneficiary may declare the entire Indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust immediately due and payable by delivery to Trustee of written declaration of default and demand for sale and of written notice of default and of election to cause to be sold the Property,which notice Trustee shall cause to be tiled for record. Beneficiary also shall deposit with Trustee this Deed of Trust, the Note, other documents requested by Trustee, and all documents evidencing expenditures secured hereby. After the lapse of such time as may then be required by law following the recordation of the notice of default,and notice of sale having been given as then required by law,Trustee,without demand on Trustor,shall sell the Property at the time and place fixed by it In the notice of sale,either as a whole or In separate parcels,and in such order as it may determine,at public auction to the highest bidder for cash In lawful money of the United States,payable at time of sale. Trustee may postpone sale of all or any portion of the Property by public announcement at such time and place of sale,,and from time to time thereafter may postpone such sale by public announcement at the time fixed by the preceding postponement In accordance with applicable law. Trustee shall deliver to such purchaser Its deed conveying the Properly so sold,but without any covenant or warranty,express or implied. The recitals In such deed of any matters or facts shall be conclusive proof of the truthfulness thereof. Any person, Including Trustor, Trustee or Beneficiary may purchase at such sale. After deducting all costs,fees and expenses of Trustee and of this Trust,including cost of evidence of title to connection with sale,Trustee shall apply the proceeds of sale to payment of: all sums expended under the terms hereof,not then repaid,with accrued Interest at the amount allowed by law In effect at the date hereof;all other sums then secured hereby;and the remainder, If any,to the person or persons legally entitled thereto. Judicial Foreclosure. With respect to all or any part of the Real Property,Lender shall have the right in lieu of foreclosure by power of sale to foreclose by judicial foreclosure In accordance with and to the full extent provided by California law. UCC Remedies. With respect to all or any part of the Personal Property,Lender shall have all the rights and remedies of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code, Including without limitation the right to recover any deficiency in the manner and to the full extent provided by California law. Collect Rents. Lender shall have the right,without notice to Trustor to take possession of and manage the Property and collect the Rents, DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 6 Including amounts past due and unpaid, and apply the net proceeds, over and above Lender's costs, against the Indebtedness. In furtherance of this right,Lender may require any tenant or other user of the Property to make payments of rent or use fees directly to Lender. It the Rents are collected by Lender,then Trustor Irrevocably designates Lender as Trustor's attorneyAn-fact to endorse Instruments received in payment thereof In the name of Trustor and to negotiate the same and collect the proceeds. Payments by tenants or other users to Lender In response to Lender's demand shall satisfy the obligations for which the payments are made,whether or not any proper grounds for the demand existed. Lender may exercise Its rights under this subparagraph either in person,by agent,or through a receiver. Appoint Receiver. Lender shall have the right to have a receiver appointed to take possession of all or any part of the Property,with the power to protect and preserve the Property,to operate the Property preceding foreclosure or sale,and to collect the Rents from the Property and apply the proceeds, over and above the cost of the receivership, against the Indebtedness. The receiver may serve without bond if permitted by law. Lender's right to the appointment of a receiver shall exist whether or not the apparent value of the Property exceeds the Indebtedness by a substantial amount. Employment by Lender shall not disqualify a person from serving as a receiver. Tenancy at Sufferance.-If Trustor remains in possession of the Property after the Property Is sold as provided above or Lender otherwise becomes entitled to possession of the Property upon default of Trustor, Trustor shall become a tenant at sufferance of Lender or the purchaser of the Property and shall,at Lender's option,either (1) pay a reasonable rental for the use of the Property, or (2) vacate the Property Immediately upon the demand of Lender. Other Remedies. Trustee or Lender shall have any other right or remedy provided in this Deed of Trust or the Note or by law. Notice of Sale. Lender shall give Trustor reasonable notice of the time and place of any public sale of the Personal Property or of the time after which any private sale or other Intended dlsposilion of the Personal Property is to be made. Reasonable notice shalt mean notice given at least ten(10)days before the time of the sale or disposition. Any sate of the Personal Property may be made in conjunction with any sale of the Real Property. Sate of the Property. To the extent permitted by applicable law,Trustor hereby waives any and all rights to have the Property marshalled. In exercising Its rights and remedies,the Trustee or Lender shall be free to sell all or any part of the Property together or separately,in one sale or by separate sales. Lender shall be entitled to bid at any public sale on all or any portion of the Property. Attorneys'Fees;Expenses. If Lender Institutes any suit or action to enforce any of the terms of this Deed of Trust,Lender shall be entitled to recover such sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorneys'fees at trial and upon any appeal. Whether or not any court action Is Involved,and to the extent not prohibited by law,all reasonable expenses Lender Incurs that in Lender's opinion are necessary at any time for the protection of Its Interest or the enforcement of Its rights shall become a part of the Indebtedness payable on demand and shalt bear Interest at the Note rate from the date of the expenditure until repaid. Expenses covered by this paragraph Include, without limitation, however subject to any limits under applicable law,Lender's attorneys'fees and Lender's legal expenses,whether or not there is a lawsuit, including attorneys'fees and expenses for bankruptcy proceedings(Including efforts to modify or vacate any automatic stay or Injunction), appeals,and any anticipated post Judgment collection services,the cost of searching records,obtaining title reports(including foreclosure reports),surveyors'reports,and appraisal fees,title Insurance,and fees for the Trustee,to the extent permitted by applicable law. Trustor also will pay any court costs,in addition to oil other sums provided by law. Rights of Trustee. Trustee shall have all of the rights and duties of Lender as set forth In this section. POWERS AND OBLIGATIONS OF TRUSTEE. The following provisions relating to the powers and obligations of Trustee are part of this Deed of Trust: Powers of Trustee. In addition to all powers of Trustee arising as a matter of law,Trustee shall have the power to take the following actions with respect to the Property upon the written request of Lender and Truslor: (a)join in preparing and filing a map or plat of the Real Property,Including the dedication of streets or other rights to the public; (b)join in granting any easement or creating any restriction on the Real Property;and (c)join In any subordination or other agreement affecting this Deed of Trust or the Interest of Lender under this Deed of Trust. Obligations to,Notify. Trustee shall not be obligated to notify any other party of a pending safe under any other trust deed or[fen,or of any action or proceeding In which Trustor,Lender,or Trustee shall be a party,unless the action or proceeding Is brought by Trustee. Trustee. Trustee shall meet all qualifications required for Trustee under applicable law. In addition to the rights and remedies set forth above,with respect to all or any part of the Property,the Trustee shall have the right to foreclose by notice and safe,and Lender shall have the right to foreclose by judicial foreclosure,in either case In accordance with and to the full extent provided by applicable law. Successor Trustee. Lender,at Lender's option, may from time to time appoint a successor Trustee to any Trustee appointed under this Deed of Trust by an Instrument executed and acknowledged by Lender and recorded in the office of the recorder of BUTTE County,State of California. The Instrument shall contain,In addition to all other matters required by state law,the names of the original Lender,Trustee,and Trustor,the book and page where this Deed of Trust Is recorded,and the name and address of the successor trustee,and the instrument shall be executed and acknowledged by Lender or its successors In Interest. The successor trustee, without conveyance of the Property, shall succeed to all the title,power,and duties conferred upon the Trustee In this Deed of Trust and by applicable law. This procedure for substitution of Trustee shall govern to the exclusion of all other provisions for substitution. Acceptance by Trustee. Trustee accepts this Trust when this Deed of Trust,duly executed and acknowledged,Is made a public record as provided by law. NOTICES. Any notice required to be given under this Deed of Trust shall be given In writing,and shall be effective when actually delivered,when actually received by telefacsfmile(unless otherwise required by law),when deposited with a nationally recognized overnight courier,or,If mailed, when deposited In the United States mall,as first class,certified or registered mall postage prepaid,directed to the addresses shown near the beginning of this Deed of Trust. Trustor requests that copies of any notices of default and safe be directed to Trustor's address shown near the beginning of this Deed of Trust. All copies of notices of foreclosure from the holder of any lien which has priority over this Deed of Trust shall be sent to Lender's address,as shown near the beginning of this Deed of Trust. Any party may change its address for notices under this Deed of Trust by giving formal written notice to the other parties,specifying that the purpose of the notice is to change the party's address. For notice purposes,Trustor agrees to keep Lender Informed at all times of Trustor's current address. Unless otherwise provided or required by law,if there Is more than one Trustor,any notice given by Lender to any Trustor Is deemed to be notice given to all Trustors. DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 7 STATEMENT OF OBLIGATION FEE. Lender may collect a fee, not to exceed the maximum amount permitted by law, for furnishing the statement of obligation as provided by Section 2943 of the Civil Code of California. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. The following miscellaneous provisions are a part of this Deed of Trust: Amendments. This Deed of Trust,together with any Related Documents,constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties as to the matters set forth In this Deed of Trust. No alteration of or amendment to this Deed of Trust shall be effective unless given in writing and signed by the party or parties sought to be charged or bound by the alteration or amendment. Annual Reports. If the Property is used for purposes other than Trustor's residence,Trustor shall furnish to Lender,upon request,a certified statement of net operating Income received from the Property during Trustor's previous fiscal year in such form and detail as Lender shall require. "Net operating Income"shall mean all cash receipts from the Properly less all cash expenditures made In connection with the operation of the Property. Caption Headings. Caption headings In this Deed of Trust are for convenience purposes only and are not to be used to interpret or define the provisions of this Deed of Trust. Merger. There shall be no merger of the Interest or estate created by this Deed of Trust with any other Interest or estate In the Property at any time held by or for the benefit of Lender In any capacity,without the written consent of Lender. Governing Law. This Deed of Trust will be governed by,construed and enforced in accordance with federal law and the laws of the Stale of California. This Deed of Trust has been accepted by Lender In the State of California. Choice of Venue. If there Is a lawsuit,Trustor agrees upon Lender's request to submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of BUTTE County, State of California. No Waiver by Lender. Lender shall not be deemed to have waived any rights under this Deed of Trust unless such waiver Is given In writing and signed by Lender. No delay or omission on the part of Lender In exercising any right shall operate as a waiver of such right or any other right. A waiver by Lender of a provision of this Deed of Trust shall not prejudice or constitute a waiver of Lender's right otherwise to demand strict compliance with that provision or any other provision of this Deed of Trust. No prior waiver by Lender,nor any course of dealing between Lender and Trustor,shall constitute a waiver of any of Lender's rights or of any of Trustor's obligations as to any future transactions. Whenever the consent of Lender is required under this Deed of Trust,the granting of such consent by Lender in any Instance shall not constitute continuing consent to subsequent instances where such consent is required and in all cases such consent may be granted or withheld in the sole discretion of Lender. Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds any provision of this Deed of Trust to be Illegal,Invalid, or unenforceable as to any circumstance,that finding shall not make the offending provision illegal,Invalid,or.unenforceable as to any other circumstance. If feasible, the offending provision shall be considered modified so that it becomes legal,valid and enforceable. If the offending provislon cannot be so modified,it shall be considered deleted from this Deed of Trust. Unless otherwise required by law,the Illegality,Invalidity,or unenforceability of any provision of this Deed of Trust shall not affect the legality,validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Deed of Trust. Successors and Assigns. Subject to any limitations stated in this Dead of Trust on transfer of Trustor's Interest,this Deed of Trust shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties,their successors and assigns. If ownership of the Property becomes vested in a person other than Trustor, Lender, without notice to Trustor, may deal with Trustor's successors with reference to this Deed of Trust and the Indebtedness by way of forbearance or extension without releasing Trustor from the obligations of this Deed of Trust or liability under the Indebtedness. Time Is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Deed of Trust. DEFINITIONS. The following capitalized words and terms shall have the following meanings when used In this Dead of Trust. Unless specifically stated to the contrary,all references to dollar amounts shall mean amounts In(awful money of the United States of America. Words and terms used In the singular shall Include the plural,and the plural shall Include the singular,as the context may require. Words and terms not otherwise defined In this Deed of Trust shall have the meanings attributed to such terms in the Uniform Commercial Code: Beneficiary. The word"Beneficiary'means Butte Community Bank,and Its successors and assigns. Borrower. The word'Borrower"means RONALD J. LAFFINS SR.AND CLAUDINE J. LAFFINS TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 17, 2000 and Includes all co-signers and co-makers signing the Note. Deed of Trust. The words"Deed of Trust'mean this Deed of Trust among Trustor,Lender,and Trustee,and Includes without limitation all assignment and security interest provisions relating to the Personal Property and Rents.' Default. The word"Default"means the Default set forth in this Deed of Trust In the section titled"Default". Environmental Laws. The words "Environmental Laws" mean any and all state, federal and local statutes, regulations and ordinances relating to the protection of human health or the environment, including without limitation the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, at seq. ("CERCIA'), the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986,Pub.L.No.99-499("SARA"),the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act,49 U.S.C.Section 1801,of seq.,the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act,42 U.S.C.Section 6901,at seq.,Chapters 6.6 through 7.7 of Division 20 of the California Health and Safety Code,Section 26100,et seq.,or other applicable state or federal taws,rules,or regulations adopted pursuant thereto. Event of Default. The words"Event of Default"mean any of the events of default set forth In this Deed of Trust In the events of default section of this Deed of Trust. Guarantor. The word"Guarantor"means any guarantor,surety,or accommodation party of any or all of the Indebtedness. Guaranty. The word"Guaranty"means the guaranty from Guarantor to Lender,Including without limitation a guaranty of all or part of the Note. Hazardous Substances. The words "Hazardous Substances" mean materials that, because of their quantity, concentration or physical, chemical or infectious characteristics,may cause or pose a present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when Improperly DEED OF TRUST (Continued) page 8 used, treated,stored, disposed of,generated, manufactured,transported or otherwise handled. The words"Hazardous Substances"are used in their very broadest sense and include without limitation any and all hazardous or toxic substances,materials or waste as defined by or listed under the Environmental Laws. The term "Hazardous Substances" also Includes, without limitation, petroleum and petroleum by-products or any fraction thereof and asbestos. Improvements. The word"Improvements"means all existing and future Improvements,buildings,structures,mobile homes affixed on the Real Property,facilities,additions,replacements and other construction on the Real Property. Indebtedness. The word"Indebtedness"means all principal,Interest,and other amounts,costs and expenses payable under the Note or Related Documents,together with all renewals of,extensions of,modifications of,consolldalions of and substitutions for the Note or Related Documents and any amounts expended or advanced by Lender to discharge Trustoes obligations or expenses incurred by Trustee or Lender to enforce Trustor's obligations under this Deed of Trust,together with Interest on such amounts as provided In this Deed of Trust. Lender. The word"Lender"means Butte Community Bank,Its successors and assigns. Note. The word"Note"means the promissory note dated July 22,2003,In the original principal amount of$296,250.00 from Trustor to Lender,together with all renewals of,extensions of, modifications of,refinancings of,consolidations of, and substitutions for the promissory note or agreemenL NOTICE TO TRUSTOR:THE NOTE CONTAINS A VARIABLE INTEREST RATE. Personal Property. The words"Personal Property"mean all equipment,fixtures,and other articles of personal property now or hereafter owned by Trustor,and now or hereafter attached or affixed to the Real Property;together with all accessions,parts,and additions to,all replacements of, and all substitutions for,any of such property;and together with all proceeds (including without limitation all Insurance proceeds and refunds of premiums)from any sale or other disposition of the Property. Property. The word"Property'means collectively the Real Property and the Personal Property. Real Property. The words"Real Property'mean the real property,Interests and rights,as further described In this Deed of Trust. Related Documents. The words "Related Documents" mean all.promissory notes, credit agreements, loan agreements, environmental agreements,security agreements,mortgages,deeds of trust,security deeds,collateral mortgages,and all other Instruments,agreements and documents,whether now or hereafter existing,executed In connection with the Indebtedness. Rents. The word'Rents"means all present and future leases,rents,revenues,income,Issues,royalties,profits,and other benefits derived from the Property together with the cash proceeds of the Rents. Trustee. The word 'Trustee" means MID VALLEY TITLE AND ESCROW COMPANY,whose address Is 601 MAIN STREET, CHICO, CA 95928 and any substitute or successor trustees. Trustor. The word"Trustor"means RONALD J.LAFFINS SR.AND CLAUDINE J.LAFFINS TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 17,2000. TRUSTOR ACKNOWLEDGES HAVING READ ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS DEED OF TRUST,AND TRUSTOR AGREES TO ITS TERMS, INCLUDING THE VARIABLE RATE PROVISIONS OF THE NOTE SECURED BY THIS DEED OF TRUST: TRUSTOR: RONALD J. FFINS SR.AND�CLAUDINE J.LAFFINS TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 17,2000 By: vvL� a1 SICK tC RO ALD J.LAFFI R.,Trfiffee of RONALD J.LAFFINS SR.AND CLAUDINE J.LAFFINS TRUST 13ATEO FEBRUA Y 17,2000 By: 7E INE J.LAFFIN ustee df RON8kD J.LAFFINS SR.AND CLAUDINE J. LAFFINS TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 17,2000 DEED OF TRUST (Continued) page 9 kk (� CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT ' STATE OF )SS COUNTY OF V---)Q4k ) On �i���a 7 ,20_a'l--_before me,Nnnv\Aa -. bt V\ _r personalty app d RONALD J.LAFFINS SR.; CLAUDINE J.LAFFINS,personally known to me(or proved-to me on th sls of satisfactory evidence)to be the person(s)whose name(s)Is/are subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same In his/her/their authorized capacity(les),and that by his/heilthelr signatures)on the Instrument the person(s),or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)acted,executed the Instrument. FOU ER 0NTY 0 C COMM.#1295702 a NOTARY PUBUC-rA IFORNIA�) WITNESS my hand and official seal. BUTTE g COMM. MARCH 1 2005] Signature 0a 1 m ,A (Seal) . (DO NOT RECORD) REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE (To be used only when obligations have been paid in full) To: ,Trustee The undersigned is the legal owner and holder of all Indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust. All sums secured by this Deed of Trust have been fully paid and satisfied. You are hereby directed,upon payment to you of any sums owing to you under the terms of this Deed of Trust or pursuant to any applicable statute,to cancel the Note secured by this Deed of Trust(which is delivered to you together with this Deed of Trust), and to reconvey,without warranty,to the parties designated by the terms of this Deed of Trust,the estate now held by you under this Deed of Trust. Please mail the reconveyence and Related Documents to: Date: Beneficiary: By: Its: LASER PRO Lendin0,Mir.3.22.09.007 Color.Kirland Flnnau,l341119ro,tiL 1007,2993. NI RI3M3 R31orv1d. -CA J:U711LPLLOOIF0 711-42" A p Order No. BU-210090 DP EXHIBIT "N' Description The land referred to herein is situated in the State of California, County of Butte, and is described as follows: PARCEL I: A PORTION OF LOT 2, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED, "ESMERALDA TRACT",WHICH MAP WAS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON MARCH 5, 1888, IN BOOK I OF MAPS, AT PAGE(S) 33, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT AN IRON PIPE MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 520 39'EAST,290.4 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT TO.AN IRON PIPE; THENCE LEAVING THE LAST MENTIONED LINE, SOUTH 370 21' EAST, 230.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58° 33' WEST, 291.95 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE THEREON SOUTH 37° 21' EAST, 200 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 370 21' WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, 200 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM A PORTION OF LOT 2, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED, "ESMERALDA TRACT",WHICH MAP WAS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON MARCH 5, 1888, IN BOOK 1 OF MAPS,AT PAGE(S) 33, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT AN IRON PIPE, MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2,SOUTH 370 21' 00"EAST, 120.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED;-THENCE FROM SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE,SOUTH 370 21' 00" EAST, 80.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE GIFT DEED TO EVERETT B. BEICH AND VERNON L. BEICH, DATED JANUARY 7, 1981,AND RECORDED IN BOOK 2585, PAGE 614, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID BEICH PARCEL,NORTH 580 33''00" EAST, 291.95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 37' 21' 00" WEST, 110.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 52° 39' 00" WEST, 290.40 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. . APN 006-230-047-000 CONTINUED Order No. BU-210090 DP DESCRIPTION: - CONTINUED PARCEL II: AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND: A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH LYING EASTERLY OF AND COINCIDENT TO THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT AN IRON PIPE, MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED, "ESMERALDA TRACT", WHICH MAP WAS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,ON MARCH 5, 1888,IN BOOK I OF MAPS,AT PAGE(S) 33;THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2,SOUTH 37°21' 00"EAST, 120.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, FOR THE LINE HEREIN DESCRIBED;THENCE FROM SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 370 21' 00" EAST, 60.00 FEET. -r 1, Z C>�j C 1N c 0 cz-�--C< • LOTS 2 e 6. ESMERALDA TRACT 6- I IT. � .0 L p a. 100- lmosr#Ly.coR.Lor e 0 660 / 35 290.4 138.6 66-01 113-25 5174 150.24 144-65 :AV f4 q6:) e 4)- Q 0.80 AC. 15CI 4 144*65 C (b 0 so 131.72 /0/ to 138.6 co 1.20 ACj s � v O I /40 19y 1 �T27 80 C� 2 120 / N I 6 22 JI ! Q O 1Z %9 Q I to ? i O I 190 140 f 138.6 q I 160 170 290.4 0-54Actn CD C, cc -99 iz c\4 1.64 AC 39.6 ?" Z Q) 0.34 Ac co • 290.4 99, 99 r. Q EAST LASSEN AVE Assessor's Map No. 06-23 County of Butte, Calif. REVSED: 4-88 i �� i i �) Page 1 of 2' Durling, Carl From: Bottenfield, Cliff Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 5:04 PM To: Durling, Carl } Subject: RE: Laffins TPM 04-13 Installation standards and Appendix VII requirements are two different beasts. The property can support two septic systems as one property but does not meet Appedix VII requirements for net usable area for a parcel split. " They cannot ask for an exemption from Appendix VII requirements with city sewer in the Esplanade in front of the property. Since city sewer is directly in front of the property they can split if they connect. Annexation, etc. is not EHD concern; if they have to annex to connect then they have to otherwise a county parcel split with connection to a municipal sewer is fine with EHD also. Cliff -----Original Message----- From: Durling, Carl Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:51 AM To: Bottenfield, Cliff Subject: RE: Laffins TPM 04-13 Here you go. - APN 006-230-047 Thanks, Carl From: Bottenfield, Cliff Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:50 AM To: Durling, Carl Cc: Fogel, Doug Subject: RE: Laffins TPM 04-13 Hi Carl, over here in the outlying Chico office we file everything by APN. Since I can't find the file can you give me the APN please that will narrow down the search area. Thanx Cliff -----Original Message----- From: Durling, Carl Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:27 AM To: Bottenfield, Cliff Cc: Fogel, Doug Subject: Laffins TPM 04-13 - ---- Cliff M The Laffins TPM was one of Steve Betts' project that I have taken over. In reviewing the file and his draft agenda report I notice that there is a condition or conditions that in.effect require the property owner to annex to the City of Chico and connect the City Sewer. I do not understand this requirement. There is nothing in the file that supports this requirement. The property is already fully developed with two commercial buildings, and the site plan shows existing septic systems for each building. - % Please respond as soon as possible with the reasoning for the requirements. I am trying to have this project scheduled for the August 11 th or 25th Planning Commission meeting. The review time to meet this schedule requires that I have your response this next week if possible. Thanks for your indulgence in this matter. 7/11/2005 Page 2 of 2 Carl Durling Associate Planner 7/11/2005 ::w • Page 1 of 1 ":F"; • Durling, Carl From: Durling, Carl Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:27 AM — �- To: Bottenfield, Cliff Cc: Fogel, Doug Subject: Laffins TPM 04-13 liff The Laffins TPM was one of Steve Betts' project that I have taken over. In reviewing the file and his draft agenda report I notice that there is a condition or conditions that in effect require the property owner to annex to the City of Chico and connect the City Sewer. I do not understand this requirement. There is nothing in the file that supports this requirement. The property is already fully developed with two commercial buildings, and the site plan shows'existing septic systems for each building. Please respond as soon as possible with the reasoning for the requirements. I am trying to have this project - scheduled for the August 11th or 25th Planning Commission meeting. The review time to meet this schedule requires that I have your response this next week if possible. Thanks for your indulgence in this matter. Carl Durling Associate Planner ,.••.. 7/8/2005 ""` Page I of 2 Durling, Carl From: Edell, Stuart Sent: Friday,June 10,2005 8:37 AM To: Crump, Mike;Christopher,Yvonne; Durling, Carl Subject: RE: Laffins TPM 04-13 re PW access I do not understand why you would think that Public Works has made a 1800 turn on this issue. The facts are clear, BCC 20-136 does not apply, if it did then they would not need an exception. If we apply the right of way and construction requirements per code, then the business on parcel 1 would be in the building setback and not meet parking requirements, therefore the application would have to be denied. The only way to approve this application is to grant exceptions for right of way and road construction as requested by the applicants engineer. Public Works is and has been in support of the grant of these exceptions. I have modified the agenda report to reflect the exception requests noted in the January 11, 2005 letter. I have not renumbered the conditions. From: Christopher, Yvonne Sent:Thursday,June 09, 2005 2:18 PM To: Crump, Mike Subject: FW: Laffins TPM 04-13 re PW access Mike, Please review the e-mail below. We were ready to go forward with this project, but are finding a change from your department which will cause us to change our recommendation to denial. My concern is that we had already moved the project forward as a recommendation of approval. We have notified the applicants,so I would expect they will be contacting your department. Just an FYI and wondering if you can look into why we had a 180 degree turn on this one at the end of the process. Thanks, Yvonne From: Durling, Carl Sent:Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:14 AM To: Christopher, Yvonne Subject: Laffins TPM 04-13 re PW access Yvonne I was assigned the Laffins TPM 04-13 file as one of Steve Betts' projects. This project is a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet for general commercial uses. Both of the proposed parcels are developed with commercial uses: Proposed Parcel 1 with an automobile repair business("Superior Auto') and proposed Parcel 2 with a swimming pool business ("Blue Haven Pools'). The property is located on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, at 2862 & 2866 Esplanade, Chico. 6/10/2005 } 5, + . . i + - , - _ r, IS ti�:.� t r,'' r• � ! ,+� ._ ,4 4 rJ `� '�C' .#�•wt,ly ;j `fJt� ' f t f, 7``. L r . �..3 Y' T' jry � 'Q• �+ spy t .t. .� (. l•f LF fu • f ,tfi1+� hu Ir 1 t Page 2 of 2 In reviewing the file I found that there was what appears to be a change Oosition by Public Works on the width of access. The applicants proposed and exception to the required 50 foot width by requesting a 22 foot width. The applicant's engineer submitted the following in support of the request: • The applicant's engineer cites the existing development as the reason why the exception should be granted. The applicant's engineer states that granting of the 22-foot wide right-of-way easement would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the project area. • Also, denial of the exception request would require that a minimum 50-foot wide right-of-way easement be established to proposed Parcel 2. Parking would not be allowed within the right-of- way easement, which would eliminate numerous existing parking spaces for the commercial business on Parcel 1. The elimination of these parking spaces would not give the existing commercial business on Parcel 1 sufficient parking spaces to meet the parking requirements of Butte County Code. The following is an activity time line as best as I can reconstruct it: 15 January 04 Application submitted. 04 February 04 Project found incomplete at IDR due to inadequate area for right-of-way. 20 August 04 Draft Initial Study completed. 08 September 04 Initial Study sent to OPR. 16 November 04 Draft agenda report completed. 24 November 04 Draft agenda report reviewed by Public Works. The report recommended approval of the exception, and no comment was made by Public Works. 01 December 04 Project determined"Ok for hearing"by Public Works. 28 March 05 Public Works emailed Steve Betts that Public Works could not approve the Tentative.Parcel Map. The reason given is that"code section 20-136, which the engineer is using to justify the reduced right-of- way width, is only applicable to residential development." 28 April 05 Took over project from Steve Betts. 23 May 05 Emailed applicant's representative outlining the position taken by Public Works. Ask them for latest conversations they have had with Public Works. Have had no response to date. Question: The Initial Study and Agenda Report both assume that the right-of-way reduction will take place. What is our . position now in light of the "new"Public Works position? Do we switch to a denial report? I recommend that we take the project back to IDR and discuss the issue there. Carl Durling 6/10/2005 , , .. 1 � F �1 t j, i .r I � f 1 . Page 1 of 2 Durling, Carl From: Christopher, Yvonne Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 7:21 PM To: Durling, Carl Subject: FW: Laffins TPM 04-13 re PW access FYI From: Crump, Mike Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 4:37 PM To: Christopher, Yvonne Cc: Edell, Stuart Subject: RE: Laffins TPM 04-13 re PW access Yvonne; I have asked Stu to respond. I had a brief explanation from Stu and it sounds like the engineer refereed to a erroneous section of the Code and thus our response, but the Planning commission can make an exception under a separate Code section that should work out as the applicant is requesting. Stu will provide the details. m6e &at*, Douetmt Butte County,Dept of Public Works 7 County Center Drive Oroville CA 95965 From: Christopher, Yvonne Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 2:18 PM To: Crump, Mike Subject: FW: Laffins TPM 04-13 re PW access Mike, Please review the e-mail below. We were ready to go forward with this project, but are finding a change from your department which will cause us to change our recommendation to denial. My concern is that we had already moved the project forward as a recommendation of approval. We have notified the applicants, so I would expect they will be contacting your department. Just an FYI and wondering if you can look into why we had a 180 degree turn on this one at the end of the process. Thanks, Yvonne From: Durling, Carl Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:14 AM To: Christopher, Yvonne Subject: Laffins TPM 04-13 re PW access Yvonne 6/10/2005 • • Page 2 of 2 1 was assigned the Laffins TPM 04-13 file as one of Steve Betts'projects. This project is a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet for general commercial uses. Both of the proposed parcels are developed with commercial uses: Proposed Parcel 1 with an automobile repair business ("Superior Auto")and proposed Parcel 2 with a swimming pool business ("Blue Haven Pools"). The property is located on the east side of Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, at 2862 &2866 Esplanade, Chico. In reviewing the:f le I found.that there was what appears to be a change in position by Public Works on. the width of access. The applicants proposed and exception to the required 50 foot width by requesting a 22 foot width. The applicant's engineer submitted the following in.support of the.request: • The applicant's engineer cites the existing development as the reason why the exception should be granted. The applicant's engineer states that granting of the 22-foot wide right-of-way easement would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the project area. . Also, denial of the exception request would require that a minimum 50-foot wide right-of-way easement be established to proposed Parcel 2. Parking would not be allowed within the right-of- way easement, which would eliminate numerous existing parking spaces for the commercial business on Parcel 1. The elimination of these parking spaces would not give the existing commercial business on Parcel 1 sufficient parking spaces to meet the parking requirements of Butte County Code. The following is an activity time line as best as I can reconstruct it: 15 January 04 Application submitted. 04 February 04 Project found incomplete at IDR due to inadequate area for right-of-way. 20 August 04 Draft Initial Study completed. 08 September 04 Initial Study sent to OPR. 16 November 04 Draft agenda report completed. 24 November 04 Draft agenda report reviewed by Public Works. The report recommended approval of the exception, and no comment was made by Public Works. 01 December 04 Project determined "Ok for hearing" by Public Works. 28 March 05 Public Works emailed Steve Betts that Public Works could not approve the Tentative Parcel Map. The reason given is that"code section 20-136,which the engineer is using to justify the reduced right-of- way width, is only applicable to residential development." 28 April 05 Took over project from Steve Betts. 23 May 05 Emailed applicant's representative outlining the position taken by Public Works. Ask them for latest conversations they have had with Public Works. Have had no response to date. Question: The Initial Study and Agenda Report both assume that the right-of-way reduction will take place. What is our position now in light of the "new" Public Works position? Do we switch to a denial report? I recommend that we take the project back to IDR and discuss the issue there. Carl Durling 6/10/2005 E '0-134 Minimum widths. . • Page 1 of 1 Remove highlighting. Qhgpter.20 SUBDIVISIONS*. 20-134 Minimum widths. Normally a minimum sixty-foot street right-of-way shall be required. A minimum fifty-foot street right-of-way shall be permitted for local access streets, short through streets, or unusual situations where the cul-de-sac is appropriate, except as provided for in section 20-136. In an industrial area a minimum sixty-foot right-of-way is required. (Ord. No. 3188, § 1(Exh. A), 3-14- 95) http://municipalcodes.lexisnexis.com/egi-bin/hilite.pl/codes/butteco/ DATA/CHAPTEP,20... 5/10/2005 20-136 Private easement as ap oved access. • Page 1 of 1 Remove highlighting, Chapter 20 SUBDIVISIONS*, 20-136 Private easement as approved access. The advisory agency may approve a building-free legal access easement as approved access for divisions of one (1) parcel into two (2) lots where the providing of approved access required by this chapter would prevent development of the proposed lot abutting the existing approved access to the property, or where existing development on the proposed lot abutting the existing approved access did not leave enough area to provide approved access to the other lot. Such approval shall be subject to the following conditions: (1)The property shall, prior to division, be within an urban area as designated on appendix I of the design standards. (2)The easement shall serve only one (1)single-family dwelling. (3)A building-free turning area shall be provided on the lot or parcel served by the easement. (4) Maximum length of the easement shall be no more than two hundred (200)feet. (5)The minimum width of the easement shall be twenty (20)feet to be improved as follows: a. Sixteen (16)feet of gravel roadway with an SC-250 prime coat minimum. b. Four(4)feet reserved for utilities. (6)There-shall be a building-free setback of ten (10)feet, measured from the edge of the easement, unless the zoning district in which the property lies requires a greater setback. (7)The parcel abutting the existing approved access shall have a frontage on the existing approved access of a minimum of seventy-five (75)feet. (8)Where possible, the easement shall be located adjacent to the existing driveways on neighboring parcels. (9)A statement shall be placed on the map indicating that the parcel to be served by the easement cannot be divided until an easement or right-of-way is provided, as set forth in section 20-134. (Ord. No. 3188, § 1(Exh. A), 3-14-95) http://municipalcodes.lexisnexis.com/cgi-bin/hilite.pl/codesibutteco/ DATA/CHAPTER20... 5/10/2005 20-4 Exceptions to design req in nts. • Page 1 of 1 Remove highlighting. j Chapter_20._SUBDIVISI.ONS* 204 Exceptions to design requirements. The hearing body in an action relative to a matter before it may authorize exceptions to any of the requirements and regulations relative to the design of a subdivision. (1)Application. Application for any such exception shall be made by a verified petition of the subdivider or designated agent, stating fully the grounds of the application and the facts relied upon by the petitioner. In order for the property referred to in the petition to come within the provisions of this section, the hearing body must find that all of the following facts apply with respect to the subject property: a. That there are special circumstances or conditions of topography or size or shape or location or existing development affecting the property, which circumstances, conditions or development existed at the time the application for the map was determined or deemed to be complete. b. That the granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the territory in which the property is situated. (2)Appeals. All determinations of the advisory agency may be appealed to the board of supervisors. (Ord. No. 3188, § I(Exh. A), 3-14-95) http://municipalcodes.lexisnexis.com/cgi-bin/hilite.pl/codesibutteco/ DATA/CHAPTER20... 5/10/2005 I P14 f y 1.3 �0 A- (r D 0 o,I P djo-� 1evrevcn +IG u A) --C-b��,ow ®� , 8 vlw--os w" a-0-41411 CA-,r,, /or A PgpnJ t/' �,✓ �cll' /ice/.�a,,- OD ,0 ®Y Ys 40 Ao(- Oq o m-r- j;.s AMP O y DAA-,P y9 G X4-4 AP7- p ,��� �-� ASA �P �,14 Av 44ax w4-,"� rrJ�r� Zauf /U&w &'bum2c�uest /��o d`�/kP �rc� ✓ PO 4311'.1Y►4tT, C.r' ��T A-;V4aPve L--4111-6f a S A-M 40C p 4Tk t,-,,, p clm 4 i : a, � .�r ' ' Page 1 of 1 Durling, Carl From: Durling, Carl Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 8:57 AM To: 'rar chico@sbcglobal.net' Subject: Laffins Ken In reviewing the file for Laffins, TPM 04-13, 1 found an email from Eric Schroth of Public Works acknowledging the receipt of the revised TPM, but saying that PW can not approve the TPM because code section 20-136 is for residential projects. What is the latest conversation you have had with PW on this subject. As far as I can see, Section 20-4 allows the Planning Commission to modify any of the requirements of the standards of the Code. Have you had any input from Fire? Carl Durling 5/23/2005 Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Schroth, Eric Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 3:07 PM To: Betts, Steve Subject: TPM 04-13 Laffins Steve, Public Works does not have any objections to the revised TPM submitted by Rolls, Anderson & Rolls. However, code section 20-136, which the engineer is using to justify the reduced right-of-way width, is only applicable to residential development. Therefore, PW cannot approve the TPM. �� �� N� Eric A. Schroth / Butte County menPublic Works Land Development Division I 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 Phone:(530)538-7266 FAX:(530)538-7171 3/29/2005 r� �. . Betts, Steve From: Stephen A. Streeter[sasplanning@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 1:21 PM To: Betts, Steve Cc: Christopher, Yvonne; Thornton, Roneva Subject: Laffins TPM 04-13 Agenda Report Laffins TPM 04-13 PC AgnR.doc... Steve - I have reviewed the draft agenda report & had a ? @ the rd. access & an edit related to the City of Chico shading comment. Roni - Please place this item on the next available draft IDR agenda for Yvonne's review. Steve 1 Betts, Steve From: DeBrunner, Deborah Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 2:51 PM To: Betts, Steve Subject: FW: Laffins TPM Status of Review I Laffins TPM 04-13 PC AgnR.doc... I contacted Ken Skillman and let him know the information below as he requested. Deborah DeBrunner Principal Analyst Development Services (530) 538-7464 Fax 538-7785 -----Original Message----- From: Stephen A. Streeter (mailto:sasplanning@sbcglobal.net) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 1:33 PM To: DeBrunner, Deborah Subject: Laffins TPM Status of Review Deborah - I had started reviewing this report a day or two ago & just sent it back to Steve Betts with a few edits. It will be on next week's IDR agenda and then on to the Plg. Com. , most likely for Jan. 13; Dec. 9 time lines are too short given the 3 wk. publishing lead time for the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Steve --- "DeBrunner, Deborah" <DDeBrunner@buttecounty.net> wrote: > Hello Stephen. Ken Skillman has called wondering the status of Ron > Laffins' TPM 04-13 project. It was originally given to Joe on 10/18 > and to you on 10/29. He is wondering what progress has been made/when > he can anticipate it being scheduled for Planning Commission. > He would like a call tomorrow. If you let me know the info, I'd be > glad to pass it on to Mr. Skillman. > Deborah DeBrunner > Principal Analyst > Butte County > Department of Development Services > 7 County Center Drive > Oroville, CA 95965 > (530) 538-7464 FAX 538-7785 1 Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Baker, Joseph Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:28 AM To: 'SASPlanning@sbcglobal.net' Cc: Betts, Steve; Christopher, Yvonne Subject: Laffins TPM 04-13 Agenda Report Steven, Attached is the staff report for the Laffins TPM 04-13. 1 have not reviewed this project so it will need review by you. Assuming that the agenda report meets standards it will need to be transmitted to the IDR by Roni and scheduled for an IDR meeting usually 2 weeks out. Once IDR has accepted the agenda report and any required changes have been accomplished it may be scheduled and advertised for public hearing before the Planning Commission. Thanks... Joe Joseph W. Baker Planning Manager Butte County Department of Development Services (530)538-6572 Aseph.baker@buttecount,y.net From: Betts, Steve Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 11:56 AM To: Baker, Joseph Subject: Attached for your review is the agenda report for the Laffins TPM project. -S- Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive,Oroville,CA 95965 Desk(530) 538-7153 Fax(530)538-7785 11/1/2004 • 9. All access rights shall be reserved by deed, per County Ordinance, and offered for dedication and depicted on the Parcel Map. 10. Pay the recording fees then in effect for recording the Parcel Maps and related, documents. 11. Provide two-way traversable access to each parcel from a County maintained road or from a state highway. 12. Submit road and drainage improvement plans for the installation and construction of the street frontage improvements on access road to Parcel 2 to RS-2B standard,including but not limited to P.C.C. curb, gutter and sidewalk and the required street section for parcels with gross acreage of one acre or less. Construct or install the required improvements. 13. Zplm uish abutters ri hts to Butte Coun ,-alon the Es lanade'fronta e of Parcel 1, -_- Deleted:Dedicate a one foot"no access a - -- -------------------------------------------------------------------g--- except at approved access points. sip"or — Deleted:r 14. Show on the additional map sheet of the Parcel Map a 50-foot building setback from the centerline of access road and a 25-foot building setback line from the right-of-way line of Esplanade.. 15. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map a plan for a permanent solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained on site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly.,maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. Show all easements of record on the Parcel Map. Deleted: 16. New lot lines shall - ---------- --------------------- ----- comply with the applicable setback requirem ts of ffic Butte County 17 Prior to or concurrentl with the recordation of the Parcel Ma a in full an and all Ordinanceand die County adopted Zoning r.._-..__......__.._-......_.........._.... �'...._......_............ ' p y--------------y...-- UnifomtBuildingCode.� delinquent, current and estimated taxes and assessments as specified in Article 8, of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7, of the California Government Code commencing with Deleted:7 Section 66492. �- --� Deleted:8 1� -,.Prior to or concurrently_with the recordation of the Parcel Map, pay all applicable assessments established by affected assessment districts,in full. Fire Department 19, A pressurized community water system for fire protection is required_ The specific ,.__.� Deleted:20 - --- -- - locations and fire flow requirements shall be in accordance with the Fire Department specifications and to the satisfaction of the County Fire Warden. Average required hydrant spacing 500 feet, hydrant size 6 inches, and residual fire flow 2,000 gpm. Submit plans to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction of facilities. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ 0 January 13,2005 0 Agenda Report-Laffins TPM 04-13 0 Page 11 of 12 0 Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Fogel, Doug Sent: Friday,December 03, 2004 4:52 PM To: Betts, Steve Cc: Bottenfield, Cliff Subject: Laffins TPM 04-13 Esplanade, APN 006-230-047 As I mentioned earlier, the creation of a 50'wide road with a 20'wide setback took so much usable sewage°"space out of each of these parcels that they were no longer able to get replacement area needed for their septics. This would make the parcels substandard if split. Therefore they now must connect to sewer and add the conditions to the map provided by Cliff. Luckily for them the sewer has been extended and is now available right our front. 12/6/2004 - 5308951409 - - - -. PAR • _ ;� r� PAGE 01 RAR 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO.CALIFORNIA 95973.5811 - TELEPHONE 530.895.1422 • FAX$30.895.1409 ROLLS ANDE SO EARS ROLLS -C1 VJIL FAX TRANSMITTAL Date: To: s T"SPN,5t-J 15EIr-5 P1-AA1NE1;' Company: igLA7•e. ��u T� pp� T-i-Ap off n�V Lea M>rN1"- �, RVtG&S Fax No.: 5357?S� From: K NNETH Ca• SK L_L_MAN �. Fax No (530) 895-1409 The following facsimile, consists of �' i pages, including this cover sheet. COMMENTS:* 7:4-e, J. ',v IHy aoyP r' le0t-ear �- S�-�.►� 2 :5 ea �e�'ev- --�a� T3 r� e C�u�tT_ye_Tyfi,,,,ent bT ru ��jC� !�[eA� lY1 .Yr lli6z© V1�(iyl,&, �}eal�'ld�LL da.-�ed �o�yLe.�eky� 20., 1200 w��' a ►-s ulpdgf'e QrP I`1C.sb 'Ga 1 N IvgS. A,y :bi �.�- td fpe�;�Ji5iflV1. I'•G�e s e de s G�/��t I P 1-�.;H cd&v- c fea •�o r i H r-o we P i e•f-e rte S S i en A=-44r (te.1t e y- c f ,F�b r�QrY 5�2ocs� , - Please 44 me- of $95-)42 z t-o d;aauy4i f�P� eayewlevl'f-i�ayue If you do not receive the entire facsimile transmission, please callus at (530) 895-1422. Thank you! T'EN7-AriVe PAcRCF-L MAS' Feg c>µr Project Name K,4A I-D b C-LAv PINE LAFFI nl S Project No. � v3M8� AP N op6_ 2 30-047) T'r o+-13 _ _nZi1112_004 07.'20 5309951409 RAR _ PAGE 03 •� u un LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH ANO BEAUTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH rJ 202 Mira Lome Drive .[ .411 Main Street (J 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 P.O.Box 5364 Oroville,CA 95965 TEL; (530)538-7282 Chioo,CA 95927 TEL: (530)538-7281 FAX: (530)538.2165 TEL: (530)891-2727 FAX: (530)538.7785 January 20,2004 FAX: (530)895.6512 Ron Laffinst;Irty 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace Chico, CA 95928 JAN 2 2 2004 ROLLS ANDERSON RE: Pre-Application TPM 2862 Esplanade AP#006-230-047 F � Dear Mr. Lafns, This office has reviewed your application as indicated above. The following is an analysis of that review. Project: Split 0.82 acre lot into two lots,18,025.5 sf and 1.6,913.7 sE Location: 2862 Esplanade,Chico Applicant: Ron Lafflus Report of Findings: The above 0.82 acre lot is located within the Nitrate Compliance Plan area in the City of Chico Sphere of Influence. The Nitrate Compliance Plan limits the discharge of wastewater to 334 gallons per day per acre. Discharge of wastewater is limited to 273.9 gallows per day for the original 0.82 acre lot. The water usage analysis provided by Rolls,Anderson and Rolls is sufficient to explain that the high water usage on the original lot is due to the use of two evaporative cooling units in the summertime. Analysis of water use records and evaporative cooling data indicates that the average waste water , discharge for the auto shop is between 50 and 100 gallons per day. With the proposed split, the front lot with the auto shop would be allowed a ma%imum of 130 gallons per day and the rear lot would he allowed a maximum of 138 gallons per day. Suggested Conditions: None. This review should not be construed as a blanket approval of your project since participation in the County Parcel Map process may change the project due to other agency requirements. Mien you do apply for your.map at the Planning Department,the remainder of your fee for I I U2/11./2004 07:20 5306951409 RAR • PAGE 02 r W^4 RAR 115 YELCOMTONE ORIVE CHICO,CALIFORNIA 95973.5811 TELEPHONE 530.895-1021 t FAX S30.895-1409 ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS CIVIL ENGINEERS January 26, 2004 Planning Division Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 04-93 Dear Planner: The above referenced Tentative Parcel Map was submitted on January 15, 2004. Since that time, the Division of Environmental Health of the Department of Public Health has issued a revised analysis for their Pre-Application review of this site(a copy is enclosed). Please insert this letter and the revised Pre-App. into your TPM 04-13 file. Sincerely, ROLLS, ANDERSON&ROLLS 9&c—..——C�� - 55�v� Kenneth G. Skillman III, P.E., P.L.S. cc: Ron Laffins tam+.vRaeCrswMounnpoliea.wd Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Monday', October 18, 2004 11:56 AM To: Baker, Joseph Attached for your review is the agenda report for the Laffins TPM project. -S- Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive,Oroville,CA 95965 Desk(530)538-7153 Fax(530) 538-7785 10/18/2004 Clear Day Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 1:57 PM To: Spoor, Cheryl Subject: RE: Update Thanks for the update. I am assuming that you will send them a bill to bring the deposit back up to$1,000.00. -S- From: Spoor, Cheryl Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 1:19 PM To: Betts, Steve Subject: Update Steve, There is only one application on your project list near 25%of deposit remaining-TPM 04-13 Laffins. The remaining deposit totals $259.85. They owe a re-deposit of$740.15 to restore a full deposit. Cheryl Spoor,Administrative Services Assistant Butte County Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 CSpoor@buttecounty.net ' 10/15/2004 Betts, Steve From: richard_helman@dot.ca.gov Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 8:34 AM To: Betts, Steve Subject: Review of ND for TPM 04-13, Laffins Hello again, Steve: We have reviewed the subject negative declaration for the parcel map application and have "No Comment" . Rick Helman Inter-governmental Review Coordinator CALTRANS-District 3, Office of Transportation Planning-North, P.O. Box 911, Marysville, CA 95901 Voice: 530-634-7612 or B-457-7612 Fax: 530-741-5346 1 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve . Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 11:03 AM To: Baker,Joseph Subject: RE: Laffins TPM - Status of Various Projects I am not sure what is going on with this project. This one may have fell through the cracks. I e-mailed the initial study to you in March, and got a reply from Felix at the end of April. I made changes to the initial study per Felix's comments, but I am not sure what happened after that. I may have resubmitted it to you for re-review but I don't have any record of doing so. Since Felix has already reviewed the initial study, and I made the changes, I have printed out the initial study and will put it in your inbox for signature by you. -S- Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk - (530) 538-7153 Fax — (530) 538-7785 -----Original Message----- From: Baker, Joseph Sent: Friday, August 20., 2004 10:18 AM To: Betts, Steve Subject: FW: Status of Various Projects Steve, Could you please let them know the status of their project. Thanks. . . Joe Joseph W. Baker Planning Manager Butte County Department of Development Services (530) 538-6572 joseph.baker@buttecounty.net -----Original Message----- From: RAR [mailto:rar_chico@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 3 :06 PM To: Christopher, Yvonne Cc: Baker, Joseph; Betts, Steve Subject: Status of Various Projects Dear Ms. Christopher, et al: Please check your records and let me know when TPM 04-13 (Laffins) will goto the Planning Commission. Since it was submitted in January, I have ran out of anything interesting to tell my client. Likewise, a Lot Line Adjustment for A.P. Numbers 066-360-013, -014, -096 (which was submitted May 17th) has an escrow held up until this minor boundary issue is resolved, so the calls from this client are becoming , shall we say, unbecoming. 1 Any help in expediting either of these projects would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Kenneth G. Skillman III, P.E. ,P.L.S. rar_chico@sbcglobal.net 2 Betts, Steve From: Baker, Joseph Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 12:17 PM To: Betts, Steve Subject: FW: Laffins IS (TPM 04-13) Steve, Does this give you what you need to circulate Laffins initial study? Thanks... Joe Joseph W. Baker Planning Manager Butte County Department of Development Services (530)538-6572 ,ioseph.bciker@buttecounty.net -----Original Message----- From: Wannenmacher, Felix Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 3:40 PM To: Betts, Steve; Baker, Joseph Cc: Miller, Gloria Subject: Laffins IS (TPM 04-13) Hi Steve and Joe, I have reviewed the IS and have the following comments. You say in 1.0 M and 4.9, and perhaps other places, that the applicant will be required to annex to Chico. I spoke with Doug Fogel, and he believes you should state the applicant needs a will serve letter, not that he is required to annex. Next, since the property is already fully developed,we need to determine why we will require being hooked to sewer rather than using the existing systems, one of which was recently approved. If we still find there is a reason to hook up, we need to evaluate the basis for an exception, so we know how to respond, and we may want to discuss some of this material in the IS. We should probably meet to discuss, perhaps when Joe is back, with Doug Fogel and either Cliff Bottenfield or Tom Loushine. Felix CONFIDENTIAL --ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email transmission, and any documents or messages attached to it, may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering this email to the intended recipient, then you are (1)notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, saving, reading or use of this information is strictly prohibited, (2)requested to discard and delete this email and any attachments, and (3) requested to immediately notify us by email that you mistakenly received this message. Thank you. 1 Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve . Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 2:34 PM To: Baker, Joseph Subject: Laffins TPM Initial Study I e-mailed you the Laffins initial study for your review back on March 18. l have not yet received any comments from you or Felix regarding this document. I received a call from the applicant's representative (Ken Skillman, Rolls Anderson Rolls) today wanting an update. I have attached the initial study in case my original e-mail has been deleted. I believe Mitigation Measure# 1 will need to be revised to reflect the recent changes requested by BQAQMD. -S- Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7-County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk- (530) 538-7153 Fax —(530) 538-7785 6/4/2004 • Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 1:04 PM To: Baker, Joseph - Subject: Laffins TPM Initial Study Attached for your review is the Laffins TPM initial study. We sent a request for comments to the City of Chico but did not receive any from them. I mailed a letter to Kim Siedler today asking them to send us comments. There may be some changes to the initial study if the City has any significant concerns. Since we are requiring the applicant to connect to the City sewer I don't think the City will have any significant concerns. -S- Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk- (530) 538-7153 Fax -(530) 538-7785 3/18/2004 Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services �v T rF YVONNE CHRISTOPHER,DIRECTOR o 0 0 0 7 County Center Drive c --- ->, o Oroville,CA 95965 0 = Jo. (530)538-7601 Telephone cOUN'�y (530)538.7785 Facsimile ADMINISTRATION*BUILDING*GIS*PLANNING March 18, 2004 Kim Seidler, Planning Director City of Chico P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927-3420 Re: Tentative Parcel Map for Ronald and Claudine Laffins, APN 006-230-046 (2862 Esplanade), File# TPM 04-13 Dear Kim: A request for comments on the above referenced project was sent to the City of Chico on January 23, 2004, but to date we have not received a response. Due to this project's location in the City of Chico's Sphere of Influence, and because it is an "island" surrounded by parcels in the City of Chico, we are especially interested in your comments regarding this project. The Butte County Environmental Health Division is recommending that the proposed parcels be connected to the City of Chico's sanitary sewer system, which would require annexation into the City. I have enclosed several copies of the proposed tentative parcel map for your review. We would also be interested in receiving comments from the City of Chico's Public Works Department. Thank you very much in advance for your comments. If you have any questions please feel free to give me a call at 538-7153 or via e-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner Enc. Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services %3T rF YVONNE CHRISTOPHER,DIRECTOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 County Center Drive o 0 Oroville,CA 95965 0 J0 (530)538-7601 Telephone COU N'�y (530)538-7785 Facsimile ADMINISTRATION*BUILDING*GIS*PLANNING February 5, 2004 Rolls Anderson&Rolls Attn: Kenneth Skillman III 115 Yellowstone Drive Chico, CA 95973-5811 Re: Project Incomplete - Tentative Parcel Map for Ronald and Claudine Laffins on APN 006-230-047,File# TPM 04-13 Dear Mr. Skillman: On February 4, 2004, the Butte County Inter-Departmental Review Committee ("IDR") reviewed the above referenced project for compliance with County regulations. It was determined that the project was incomplete for the following reasons: 1. The materials submitted with the project application indicate that on-site septic systems will be utilized on each proposed parcel. According to the Butte County Environmental Health Division, neither of the two proposed parcels has adequate sewage disposal area meeting the requirements of Appendix VII of the Butte County Improvement Standards. Because of this, the proposed parcels must be connected to the City of Chico's sanitary sewer system, which runs along the Esplanade in front of the project site. You will need to obtain approval from the City of Chico to connect to their sewer system. We will not take any further action on this project until such time as the necessary approval for connection to the City of Chico sanitary sewer system is received. 2. The proposed access to Parcel 2 does not meet the standards of Butte County Code section 20-134 (Minimum widths). Section 20-134 requires a minimum sixty-foot street right-of-way, but a minimum fifty-foot street right-of-way may be permitted for local access streets, short through streets, or unusual situations where a cul-de-sac is appropriate. The proposed road easement also does not meet the requirements of Butte County Code section 20-136 (Private easement as approved access). Butte County Code Section 20-4 (Exceptions to design 0 requirements) allows an applicant to request, in writing, an exception to any design requirement. The Butte County Planning Commission would have to make the findings as stated in Section 20-4 in order to grant the exception. Until we receive the above requested items this project will remain in an incomplete status. No further processing of this project will occur until such time as the required materials are received. The timelines pursuant to the California Permit Streamlining Act are suspended until such time as this project is deemed complete. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, I can be reached between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at (530) 538-7153, or via e-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner 00 .0 DL +S+ aS h r' 'R OL till po ityN r14Y R. Y rl ti ., ' �1. �: � �����%�y��� � '! � ��+ � y � � � i � � �, �� �� ��. � � / � � `' � , j �\ / � '����� ���� � � � , � �' `'� � � , ;� ��� � � ;% �ly w 1 ,�Y� f �' !P ., e ,��' � r .. �,. ;. �; �.R s y ',' .a .� :r � .` �� •� } �t - � � '*� r �~r } �, r ,� � ,. ��� j„ r. T y., r � � • i r�� � .. s �� � , r :.. S 2 City of Chic C- C-2 ` `� � � � � � �'•I'_ 1111 / ' /4��••� � �i���� ,.�j�., �,\ / ,moi�� ��i i�i ,A.� �� ♦ I�_ g. ♦���:�j�l♦�♦♦���♦♦♦♦iii►♦iA♦i���♦�♦ � ►iI♦V�i ♦ A I �� ♦ / ♦♦ ot��,♦•'01►p���`�♦,��♦♦1♦ ♦ �j��I� I�\♦j♦,♦/♦�� .IST\♦,� �►�/" ♦ 1G��a. gigg"Km-15,21t. ON val 1►%�O •. •\♦r O♦yam♦ IN IN INQ ♦m♦ WE 2 \. ♦ ♦O. .\..\.�. �` I ♦ `,\. \♦�� ♦ 1 1♦� ♦♦♦i ►C 11♦��� ♦�!l♦ ♦i �/ ✓��I 0 FOAM �•�i� gpm IF ,�\♦ � . ♦ ♦ � ♦ ... \�.� , � ♦ ��� ►111111// /.�� ,• ♦♦ c\I� ��♦ ♦ ♦ h, ♦.♦♦♦I\ / I SII/1. • • X111 ✓'/�`♦♦\♦�♦� �1�� ♦♦i♦-'�� �� ♦ /♦�♦.��♦�,�II�II/II/II�r�i •111111 WIN �� � �' \♦��`� ♦♦1♦j �i1►1 ��'�� \ ♦♦♦♦iii�i�i♦� \I/u�►� ♦ ��1 ♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦i ♦♦. •� ♦tr 1 ♦���j ♦. /�� ��♦111 ♦, '��, ���►I,o�i .�j�� ♦ !LTi ®♦ �;',' ��♦♦� , r`• , '�+'<•.�'+�/ • , ♦\��` wo♦ ♦ ♦♦ . ; ►.• / ��j /�♦♦♦ ♦�� ��\iii�'1 ♦, .�.,,�♦ `, �\ A•����i,� �++j/+�♦ � ,` , '�♦♦♦ �♦��♦r .jam -64 ll gm WN ��♦� +�\ .♦♦iii♦i�♦ii��♦ , LIMA rr \�j,♦�� FRI , ,.'IS RUM, �;"�ip� _ ♦.\����� ,• RN Qi ♦ . . I ♦v�/ ♦♦/�1�� / ♦��:_�� O �O �� I l�� 110.1 IM \%`�♦its'd'r�'�O/p♦\ �♦ii ��'%`�0�1�..��_ r.��♦�1��\\♦..�► ``� Oil EIR NO �i"ap WE p FEW�♦�" .�♦♦♦��♦,p O�� �������1 � �♦►�i��♦�Fii�i♦` mac♦\O�i`���� ♦ �i /1� ♦ \♦1►� ♦.♦i O 01/,2a �' ♦��V♦� i��I C�♦ ♦ ��i♦� \III ♦ ♦� I �i VI �� 7 Page 1 of 1 i Durling, Carl From: Durling, Carl Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005'6:31 AM To: 'Steve Betts' Subject: RE: Laffins Map Steve Thanks for the info. I did speak with Cliff and he wasn't sure. ONLY A MONTH? WOW!!! If only here it were pos�,Ible. Carl From: Steve Betts [mailto:sbetts@ci.chico.ca.us] Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 4:13 PM To: Durling, Carl Subject: Laffins Map Carl, Cliff Sellers, who handles all the annexation projects for the City,just told me that the Laffins parcel was just annexed into the.City. So, maybe you don't have to send the IS to the State Clearinghouse after all. I don't know what effect the annexation has on an active project - does it become automatically void and the owner has to reapply to the City? Maybe you should check with Felix (or Steve Lucas or.Cliff Sellers) to find out, 'cause I don't know. If the project comes to the City we will do a minor land division, which will be finished in about a month! I think the County has had the project for almost two years? Let me know what happens. -S- 10/4/2005 o�v T rF0 Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services 0 o Paul McIntosh,Interim Director www.buttecounty.net/dds o oV�s 0 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 c00 N'�y (530)538-7601 Telephone (530)538-7785 Facsimile September 2;2005 To: Inter-Departmental Review Committee Subject: Agenda Report and Final Conditions for Laffins, Trustees, TPM 04-13 Planner: Carl Durling APN: 006-230-047 Location on the east side of the Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, at 2862 Esplanade, Date of IDR: 9/07/2005 Attached please find the Agenda Report for TPM 04-13 for your review of the mitigation measures and conditions. A hard copy of the application, including maps, was sent to Environmental Health, LAFCo, County Counsel, the Assessor's office, the Public Works Director, the Agricultural Commissioner,'CDF, and the Building Manager at the time of application. The purpose of this notice is to give you the opportunity to comment on the Agenda Report electronically to the planner, if you so desire, so that preparations can be made for the IDR meeting on 9/07/2005. Comments: (Please send your response to edurling@buttecounty.net.) No apparent adverse agricultural..issues, .no other conditions o.r n.utigati.ng measures. Signature: Z1010A C H;.t'.P, 2e�'�g. , r Date: September 1 2005 K:/Planning/Projects/ANewFile/IDR Memos/Final Conditions Durling, Carl From: Stephen A. Streeter[sasplanning@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 11:34 AM To: Durling, Carl Subject: me: Laffins TPM 04-13 PC Agenda Report2 non b�l WE Laffins TPM 04-13 PC agn.doc(... --- "Durling, Carl <CDurling@buttecounty.net> wrote: • Stephen • I have modified Steve' s original report, especially in the area of > Environmental Health. The report requires that the property connect • to City sewer because dividing the parcel is in conflict with Appendix > VII requirements. However, it should be noted that the Initial Study • did not find a significant impact to ground water (nitrate issue) , and • therefore did not recommend a mitigation measure. I queried Cliff at •. Chico Environmental Health who confirmed the necessity to connect to • City sewer. > I assume neither you nor Felix have reviewed this report since there > is nothing in the electronic file from either of you. > However, for some > reason, Public Works did comment on it. > Carl Carl, As you saw from the prior e-mail, I did review and comment on this report in Nov. '04 . I have more comments this time in the attachment. Stephen Streeter, AICP SAS Planning Consulting Davis, CA (530) 979-0095 business .(530) 758-7328 home/fax S 1 PROJECT COORDINATION FORM Date of IDR: /�-Z/; PROJECTNAME: C��f).i;ifi � �r� r ',j, PROJECT NUMBER: DEPT. COMMENTS READY FOR HEARING? PLANNING P. w. r v0?J 6-rW ,� cl:�' A06(:556 1L -bWt 0CWA4r' 7 ENV. HEALTH COUNSEL . AG ee � !v BLDG ASSESSOR FIRE Al Al o STATE OF CALIFORNIA c o � Governor'.s Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit OFCAW Arnold Schwarzenegger Jan Boel Governor Acting Director October 13,2004 BUTTE Stephen Betts COUNTY Butte County OCT 15 2004 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Subject: Laffins Tentative Parcel Map(TPM 04-13) SCH#: 2004092044 Dear Stephen Betts: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Negative Declaration to selected state agencies for review. The review period closed on October 12,2004,and no state agencies submitted comments by that date. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents,pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please call the State Clearinghouse at(916)445-0613 if you have any questions regarding-the environmental review process. If you have a question about the above-named project,please refer to the ten-digit State Clearinghouse number when contacting this office. Sincerely, Terry Robe Director,State Clearinghouse 1400 TENTH STREET P.O.BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO,CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 TEL(916)445-0613 FAX(916)323-3018 www.opr.ca.gov - � .. � � -� � I i Document Details Report State.Clearinghouse Data Bas* SCH# 2004092044 Project Title Laffins Tentative Parcel Map(TPM 04-13) Lead Agency Butte County Type Neg Negative Declaration Description Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 0.8-acre parcel into one parcel of 16,914 sf(0.39 acres)and one parcel of 18,025 sf(0.41 acres). Lead Agency Contact Name Stephen Betts Agency Butte County Phone (530)538-7153 Fax email Address .7 County Center Drive City Oroville State CA Zip 95965 Project Location County Butte City Chico Region Cross Streets Esplanada and East/West Lassen Parcel No. 006-230-047 Township Range Section Base Proximity to: Highways SR 99, SR 32 Airports Chico Municipal Railways UPRR Waterways Mud Creek, Keefer Slough, Sycamore Creek, Lindo Channel Schools Shasta Elem., McManus Elem. Land Use Commercial/C-2/Commercial Project Issues AestheticNisual;Agricultural Land;Air Quality;Archaeologic-Historic; Cumulative Effects; Drainage/Absorption; Flood Plain/Flooding; Forest Land/Fire Hazard; Geologic/Seismic; Growth Inducing; Landuse; Minerals; Noise; Population/Housing Balance; Public Services; Recreation/Parks; Schools/Universities;Septic System;Sewer Capacity;Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading; Solid Waste; Toxic/Hazardous;Traffic/Circulation;Vegetation;Water Quality;Water Supply;Wetland/Riparian; Wildlife Reviewing Resources Agency; Regional Water Quality Control Bd., Region 5(Redding); Department of Parks and Agencies Recreation;Native American Heritage Commission;Public Utilities Commission;Office of Historic Preservation; Department of Forestry and Fire Protection; Department of Fish and Game, Region 2; Department of Water Resources;Caltrans, District 3; Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Received 09/10/2004 Start of Review 09/10/2004 End of Review 10/12/2004 Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency. ., .._ �, _ v rt � I �e Betts, Steve From: Wannenmacher, Felix Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 3:40 PM To: Betts, Steve; Baker, Joseph Cc: Miller, Gloria Subject: Laffins IS (TPM 04-13) Hi Steve and Joe, I have reviewed the IS and have the following comments. You say in 1.0 M and 4.9, and perhaps other places, that the applicant will be required to annex to Chico. spoke with Doug Fogel, and he believes you should state the applicant needs a will serve letter, not that.he is required to annex. Next, since the property is already fully developed, we need to determine why we will require being hooked to sewer rather than using the existing systems, one of which was recently approved. If we still find there is a reason to hook up, we need to evaluate the basis for an exception, so we know how to respond, and we may want to discuss some of this material in the IS. We should probably meet to discuss, perhaps when Joe is back, with Doug Fogel and either Cliff Bottenfield or Tom Loushine. Felix CONFIDENTIAL --ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email transmission, and any documents or messages attached to it, may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering this email to the intended recipient, then you are (1)notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, saving, reading or use of this information is strictly prohibited, (2) requested to discard and delete this email and any attachments, and (3) requested to immediately notify us by email that you mistakenly received this message. Thank you. 1 PROJECT COORDINATION FORM Date of IDR: 1�� n PROJECT NAME: �'d 4 '' PROJECT NUMBER: DEPT. COMMENTS READY FOR HEARING? PLANNING - P.W. - bbieS Al0 .- Zx� S W07 /,-I 7 fe-oAv s72)5' � l�Cc-t:�'s 's'��. ENV. HEALTH ,meq'D To -/0 6-17-1 - (INA--DEVUA-re COUNSEL AG BLDG ASSESSOR FIRE #04)6/ BUTTE COUNTY IN OR-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANWW MAR 15 2004 BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TO: Steve Betts, Development Services, Planning Division FROM: Clifford Bottenfield, Jr. Supervisor, Environmental Health SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map Conditions DATE: March 12, 2004 APPLICANT: Ronald& Claudine Laffins Trustees DATE: 1-15-04 AGENT: Kenneth Skillman III, P.E. APN: 006-230-047 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map TPM-0413 Items below are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS H. EXISTING COMMUNITY SEWER 1. Prior to the Final Map provide a letter or other documentation from City of Chico stating that they are willing and able to supply sewer service to parcels 1 & 2. - 0 2. Place a note on the additional map sheet that states "Development of parcels 1 & 2 will require connection to a public sanitary sewer". 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, under a permit issued by the Environmental Health Division, properly abandon the septic tank and connect the dwelling(s) on parcels 1 &2 to public sewer. CB/dd/land/comment conditions/laffins tpm 04 13 Post-it®Fax Note 7671 Datey r20 �� pa°gesi TO From slcm%Aq < Co./Dept. C Phone# _ "G Phone# Fax# g5��40qJ 1 Fax# I Sent By: BUTTE CO ENVIRONMENTALHEALTH; 530 895 ,6512; Mar-12-04 10:52AM; Page 1/1 INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM BUTTE COUNTY TO: Steve Betts,Development Services,Planning Division FROM: Clifford Bottenfield.Jr. Supervisor,Environmental Health SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map Conditions DATE: March 12,2004 APPLICANT: Ronald&Claudine Laffjns Trustees DATE: 1-15-04 AGENT: Kenneth idllman M.F.E. APN: 006-230-047 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Man TPM-0413 Items below are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENVMQNh NTAL HEALTH DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS H. EXISTING COMMUNITY SEWER 1. Prior to the Final Map provide a letter or other documedtation from City of Chico stating that they are willing and able to supply sewer service to parcels l &2: 2. Place a note on the additional map sheet that states"Development of parcels 1 & 2 will require connection to a public sanitary sewer". 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit,under a penrMft issued by the Environmental Health Division,properly abandon the deptic tank and connect the dwelling(s)on parcels 1 &2 to public sewer. CB/dd/land/oomment ennditionWhaTma tpm 0413 —� Butte County Depakent of Development Servic PLANNING DIVISION o�V T rF0 7 County Center Drive o 0 Oroville,CA 95965 Environmental Health 0 0 (530)538-7601 Telephone 0 - }�- 0 0 - 0 (530)538-7785 Facsimile AN 2 6 2004 c�UN.�`l January 23,2004 7 County Center Drive Oroville,Ca TO: Environmental Health FROM: Stephen Betts,Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Ronald & Claudine Laffins,Trustees,Tentative Parcel Map -TPM 04-13 APN: 006-230-047 DATE OF IDR: 2/4/2004 ENV1R0NM7,;%,,' 1. IDR RESPONSE REGARDING JAN 2 S 2004 COMPLETENESS OF APPLICATION DUE BY: February 2, 2004 CHIC9, CALIFORNIA AGENCY/DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS/NIITIGATION MEASURES DUE BY: February 19, 2004 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, to be determined at the Inter-Departmental Review (IDR) Committee meeting on 2/4/2004, and/or to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map application to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet PROJECT LOCATION: on the east side of the Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, ai 2862 Esplanade, Chico COUNTY SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO.: 3 ZONING: C-2 (General Commercial) GENERAL PLAN: C (Commercial) If a response cannot be submitted prior to the due dates listed above,please call Stephen Betts at (530) 538-7153 or send him an e-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for 5/27/2004 before the Planning Commission. �IDW. OMMITTU-,- `AP PLICATIONr:CO'MPLET=E D No (Please send response to sbefts@buttecounty.net by February 2, 2004 ) Yes (Conditions/mitigation measures due by February 19, 2004) K:\Planning\Projects\CommentRequestForm.dot Betts, Steve From: Tom Hayes [THAYES@ci.chico.ca.us] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 2:04 PM To: Betts; Steve Cc: Mary Fitch Subject: Tentative Parcel Map for Ronald and Claudine Laffines, TPM04-13 Steve, Thank you for following up to request comments from the City of Chico. I have reviewed this proposal with planning and public works and have the following comments: 1) Since, sanitary sewer is located at the southwest corner of+the property it seems reasonable to request that at least the new development connect to the sewer and extend the sewer main, in the Esplanade, to the north property line of the property to enable the next property to connect. 2) Should the owner opt to connect to the sewer, the City will require annexation. 3)' It is very likely that this property will be annexed to the City, if not now in the near future. The City development standards require a minimum of 50 percent shading of parking lot areas. The City would request that this standard be applied to Parcel 2 development. Thank you again for the opportunity to comment on this project'. Tom Hayes 1 . G o�MY Air pia J 2525 Dominic Drive,Suite J �'�e W.James Wagoner Chico,CA 95928 Air Pollution Control Officer (530)891-2882 Robert McLaughlin (530)891-2878 Fax a �q�� Asst Air Pollution Control Officer ement 9'S BUTTE COUNTY MAR 0 <1 2004' February 26, 2004 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Stephen Betts, Butte County Department Development Services Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Rd: TPM 04-13 —Ronald& Claudine Laffins Dear Mr. Betts: The District has reviewed the request for comments for a Tentative Parcel Map noted above located at 2862 Esplanade, Chico. Based on_the information submitted the District recommends incorporating measures to control fugitive dust emission from all road and other construction activities during project improvements. Measures may include site and driveway watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed project. If you have any questions, please contact the District at 89.1-2882. Sincerely, Gail Williams Air Quality Planner File No 3452 t:\apps_files\ev\bctpm0413.doc BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees DATE: 1/15/2004 AGENT: Kenneth G. Skillman III, P.E., P.L.S. APN: 006-230-047 FILE#: TPM 04-13 PLANNER: Stephen Betts PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map application to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS: S. FIRE CLEARANCE 1. Construction, installation or development of structures or facilities on the parcels/lots shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, (Public Resources Code 4290), and all other applicable State and County codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of application for improvement permits. 2. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and maintained continuously thereafter. 3. Fire hydrant identification, reflector or post reflectors shall be installed acceptable to the County Fire Warden. 4. In lieu of a pressurized water system or water storage tank, payment of$200.00 per created parcel into the Battalion water tend fund, is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Place a note on the Final Map or on additional sheets that states"Development of these lots may require payment into the Water Tender Fund." X_ 5. A pressurized community water system for fire protection is required. The specific locations and fire flow requirements shall be in accordance with the Fire Department specifications and to the satisfaction of the County Fire Warden. Average required hydrant spacing 500 feet, hydrant size 6 inches, and residual fire flow 2000 gpm. Submit plans to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction of facilities. 6. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet stating that: "Fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurized community water system, with hydrants that meet Fire Department specifications,serves the parcels." 7. In lieu of hydrant installation,payment may be made into the hydrant fund at a cost of$1.72 per lineal foot of street frontage. The estimated fee amount is$ X_ 8. Prior to recordation of the Map or application for a building permit, the applicant shall pay the then current established fee for the West Chico Fire Station Fund. _ 9. Provide an all weather access of at least 10 feet wide and with a vertical clearance of 15 feet that will accommodate a 40,000 pound fire apparatus to all structures. INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM BUTTE COUNTY TO: Steve Betts, Development Services, Planning Division FROM: Clifford Bottenfield, Jr. Supervisor, Environmental Health SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map Conditions DATE: March 12, 2004 APPLICANT: Ronald& Claudine Laffins Trustees DATE: 1-15-04 AGENT: Kenneth Skillman III, P.E. APN: 006-230-047 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map TPM-0413 Items below are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS H. EXISTING COMMUNITY SEWER 1. Prior to the Final Map provide a letter or other documentation from City of Chico stating that they are willing and able to supply sewer service to parcels 1 & 2. 2. Place a note on the additional map sheet that states "Development of parcels 1 & 2 will require connection to a public sanitary sewer". 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, under a permit issued by the Environmental Health Division,properly abandon the septic tank and connect the dwelling(s) on parcels 1 &2 to public sewer. CB/dd/land/comment conditions/laffins tpm 04 13 EV+ h O V E D MAR 12 2004 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION ilk 114,�4 klIq Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 9:12 AM. To: Crawford, Ted Subject: Laffins Tentative Parcel Map, File#TPM 04-13, APN 006-230-047 Ted, I looked through my file on this project and cannot find your conditions. I checked my received e-mails from you and could not find anything from you with your conditions. So,when you get the chance please forward to me your conditions for project approval: Thanks. -S- Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk- (530)538-7153 Fax —(530) 538-7785 3/12/2004 [FEB STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees DATE: 1 5/2004 BUTPLAN AGENT: Kenneth G. Skillman III, P.E., P.L.S. APN: 006- - FILE#: TPM 04-13 PLANNER: Stephen Betts PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map application to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS: A. STREETS ® 1. Prior to, or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, provide a fully executed road maintenance agreement on the County approved form. ❑ 2. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the Parcel Map. Street names shall be approved by the County Address Coordinator prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map. ® 3. Obtain encroachment permit for all new or existing driveway approaches and construct them to County standards,as specified in County Improvement Standards. ❑ 4. Provide a cul-de-sac, designed and constructed to county standards as specified in the County Improvement Standards. The Parcel Map shall show the cul-de-sac. ® 5. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map, prove, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works, that there is approved access conforming to County standards to each parcel from a publicly maintained road. Minimum 50' access easement required to Parcel 2. ® 6. All access rights shall be reserved by deed,per County Ordinance, and offered for dedication and depicted on the Parcel Map. ❑ 7. The developer shall provide all necessary traffic safety signs including stop signs. A note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet of the Parcel Map stating: "No public entity shall be responsible for the maintenance of the stop sign. In accordance with Civil Code Section 845, maintenance of the road,including the stop sign, shall be shared by those properties with a legal interest in the private right-of-way or easement." ® 8. Pay the recording fees then in effect for recording the Parcel Maps and related documents. ❑ 9. Deed to Butte County,in fee simple,_feet of right-of-way from the centerline of . The right of way shall be sufficient for the installation of standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. ® 10. Provide two-way traversable access to each parcel from a County maintained road or from a state highway. improve paFeel fFeatage to R-9 —UP and aerress read to par-eel being divided to A Q L (if the 1 b t .7 C 1 b 't d- nd- nv � �aznv=pis`rcm��'c'a^i�cr'cmcQ-i��Tacres-oi--lc�.i--iirsrv�:r-arca, �civiracivaa-arm drainage plans to the DepaFtment of u res-for--plan-eheekii^ and al pFieF to eeetietr)-. ® 11. Submit road and drainage improvement plans for the installation and construction of the street frontage improvements on access road to parcel 2 to RS-2B standard, including but not limited to P.C.C. curb, gutter and sidewalk, and the required street section for parcels with gross acreage of one acre or less. Construct or install the required improvements. I �•r. •�tri ® 12. Relinquish abutters rights to Butte County,along the Esplanade frontage of parcel 1 ,except at approved access point. ❑ 13. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map,obtain an encroachment permit and construct a standard road approach,in accordance with County Improvement Standards. Adequate sight distance at the intersection of access road and shall be provided. ® 14. Show on the additional map sheet of the Parcel Map a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline of access road and 25'building setback line from right-of-way line of Esplanade B. DRAINAGE ® 1. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map a plan for a permanent solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained on site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. ❑ 2. Establish 100 year flood plain elevations and the lowest floor elevations for any structures. Show on the additional map sheet the elevations (by contours) and the location of an accepted NGVD benchmark and a temporary benchmark on-site. ❑ 3. Pay the applicable drainage fees in effect at the time of recordation of the Parcel Map for the drainage area. (The current fee is now$ /acre.) ❑ 4. A Construction Storm Water Permit will be required by the State Water Resources Control Board if the project results in a disturbance(including clearing,excavation,filling,and grading)of one or more acres. Construction activities that result in a land disturbance of less than one acre, but which are part of a larger common plan of development, also require a permit. The Permit must be obtained from the State Water Resources Control Board prior to construction. C. PARCEL MAP ® 1. New lot lines shall comply with the applicable setback requirements of the Butte County Zoning Ordinance and the County adopted Uniform Building Code. ® 2. Show all easements of record on the Parcel Map. ® 3. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map,pay in full any and all delinquent, current and estimated taxes and assessments as specified in Article 8 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7,of the California Government Code commencing with Section 66492. ❑ 4. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map, prove, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works,that the parcel to be divided is a legal parcel. ® 5. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, pay all applicable assessments established by affected assessment districts,in full. ❑ 6. Place a note on a separate document which.is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet of the Parcel Map regarding BU'T'TE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 2770 Olive Highway, Suite C o Oroville, California 95966-6117 (530)538-7784 c Fax (530)538-2847 e www.buttelafco.org MEMORANDUM COUNTY FEB 0 4 2004 TO: Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division 'DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FROM: Stephen Lucas, Principal Planner SUBJECT: TPM 04-13, Ron Laffins DATE: February 3, 2004 The affected parcels are located within the boundaries of the following local agencies: 1. Butte County Mosquito and Vector Control District 2. Chico Area Recreation and Park District 3. Chico Unified School District 4. Butte Community College District 5. CSA No. 114 (Chico Nitrate) 6. CSA No. 164 (Animal Control) 7. Greater Chico Urban Area Redevelopment Agency 8. CSA No. 25 (Shasta Union Drainage) Please accept the following comments concerning the project described above. 1. The parcel is located in the Chico Urban Area,the Chico Sphere of Influence and is pre-zoned for Community Commercial uses with a General Plan designation of Community Commercial. Consultation with the City is encouraged to.promote coordinated planning within the Sphere and ensure development is consistent with City of Chico standards. LAFCO policies discourage urban development without annexation to a city. 2. The parcels are located in the Chico Urban Area as designated by the County, is consideration of the proposed urban use without annexation consistent with the County General Plan which encourages annexation where possible? 3. The application indicates the project will be served by on-site septic systems. Considering the size of the parcels to be created,this appears to be inconsistent with the Chico Nitrate Compliance Plan. The comments enclosed from the Environmental Health Division appear to support the annexation of the parcel and connection to sewer service in order to comply with waste discharge requirements. 4. Should the County elect to approve the project with the use of septic systems, in anticipation of possible future annexation and sewer availability, septic systems should be designed for easy connection to municipal sewer service facilities. i 6. As a historical note, LAFCO approved an annexation to the City in August 200 (LAFCO File No. 00-37)which included the three parcels immediately to the south in order to address failed septic systems. LAFCO also approved an annexation(LAFCO File No.02-08)in January 2001 affecting 'a single parcel to north to allow further development on city sewer. In both cases, surrounding landowners were offered the opportunity to annex at no cost, an offer not accepted despite understanding the need for municipal sewer service for future development. 7. The tentative parcel map indicates the development will utilize City drainage facilities for the discharge of storm water. As these are City owned and operated facilities, it would be appropriate for the parcel to annex to the City for receipt of these services. If you have any questions concerning these comments, please contact our office at your convenience. Butte County Department of Development Services PLANNING DIVISIONiT lF° 7 County Center Drive LAFC® 0 0 Oroville,CA 95965 0 o (530)538-7601 Telephone ��� 2 Zoo °o - -�qs oo (530)538-7785 Facsimile �- January 23,2004 Oroville, California c�U N'�y TO: LAFCo FROM: Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Ronald & Claudine Laffins, Trustees, Tentative Parcel Map - TPM 04-13 APN: 006-230-047 062 i9y DATE OF IDR: 2/4/2004 IDR RESPONSE REGARDING COMPLETENESS OF APPLICATION DUE BY: February 2, 2004 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS/MITIGATION MEASURES DUE BY: February 19, 2004 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, to be determined at the Inter-Departmental Review (IDR) Committee meeting on 2/4/2004, and/or to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map application to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet PROJECT LOCATION: on the east side of the Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, at 2862 Esplanade, Chico COUNTY SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO.: 3 ZONING: C-2 (General Commercial) GENERAL PLAN: C (Commercial) If a response cannot be submitted prior to the due dates listed above,please call Stephen Betts at (530) 538-7153 or send him an e-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for 5/27/2004 before the Planning Commission. IDR.COMMITTEE'. APPLICATION COMPLETE - . 0 No (Please send response to sbetts buttecounty.net by February 2, 2004 ) ❑ Yes (Conditions/mitigation measures due by February 19, 2004) K:\Planning\Projects\CommentRequestForm.dot i �. liYt��er- G�:co Utv1blih Arca Z C S A Z I n l{ C.A. P- P- D j. C• V. S• D• G. IlAe- Cotte-y. , I, ?. CSR III Gl/,f�;� G'h;co sow j �ic�ancd CoM�►vifr Cor,.•►c.c�,�l F /n // 7U� pro otfp utf f/D d�C<frt �he ntC(( �i S'tWG✓ ( P d TPM in/,���afc s f�ov.-r G��aa•'nc'c fig be �vd�i��e 6,. �l�r �f C�;c, 46 • • Page 1 of 2 Betts, Steve From: Schroth, Eric Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 2:15 PM To: Betts, Steve Subject: RE: Laffins Tentative Parcel Map project(TPM 04-13), APN 006-230-047 Steve, You are correct. They need a minimum 50'wide right of way and a RS-2B access road per County Standards. Based on this, I assume that the application is incomplete. -----Original Message----- From: Betts, Steve Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 11:33 AM To: Schroth, Eric Subject: Laffins Tentative Parcel Map project(TPM 04-13), APN 006-230-047 Eric, Access to Parcel 2 of this project is proposed to be via a 22-foot wide easement across Parcel 1. Butte County Code Section 20-136 (Private easement as approved access)states that the private easement can only serve one single family dwelling unit. This is a commercial property and a swimming pool contractor's office is currently being constructed on Parcel 2. So, it appears to me that the proposed access is not allowed and the applicant would have to request an exception to the design standards. You may want to check with Stu to see if this is correct. The IDR will be reviewing this project next week(Feb. 2). Thanks. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk- (530)538-7153 Fax —(530)538-7785 20-136 Private easement as approved access. The advisory agency may approve a building-free legal access easement as approved access for divisions of one(1) parcel into two (2)lots where the providing of approved access required by this chapter would prevent development of the proposed lot abutting the existing approved access to the property, or where existing development on the proposed lot abutting the existing approved access did not leave enough area to provide approved access to the other lot. Such approval shall be subject to the following conditions: (1)The property shall, prior to division, be within an urban area as designated on appendix I of the design standards. (2)The easement shall serve only one (1) single-family dwelling. (3)A building-free turning area shall be provided on the lot or parcel served by the easement. - (4) Maximum length of the easement shall be no more than two hundred (200)feet. (5)The minimum width of the easement shall be twenty(20)feet to be improved as follows: a. Sixteen (16)feet of gravel roadway with an SC-250 prime coat minimum. 2/3/2004 >� • � Page 2 of 2 7 ' b. Four(4)feet reserved for utilities. (6)There shall be a building-free setback of ten (10)feet, measured from the edge of the easement, unless the zoning district in which the property lies requires a greater setback. (7)The parcel abutting the existing approved access shall have a frontage on the existing approved access of a minimum of seventy-five (75)feet. (8)Where possible, the easement shall be located adjacent to the existing driveways on neighboring parcels. (9)A statement shall be placed on the map indicating that the parcel to be served by the easement cannot be divided until an easement or right-of-way is provided, as set forth in section 20-134. (Ord. No. 3188, § 1(Exh. A), 3-14-95) 2/3/2004 • • Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 11:33 AM To: Schroth, Eric Subject: Laffins Tentative Parcel Map project(TPM 04-13),APN 006-230-047 Eric, Access to Parcel 2 of this project is proposed to be via a 22-foot wide easement across Parcel 1. Butte County Code Section 20-136 (Private easement as approved access)states that the private easement can only serve one single family dwelling unit. This is a commercial property and a swimming pool contractor's office is currently being constructed on Parcel 2. So, it appears to me that the proposed access is not allowed and the applicant would have to request an exception to the design standards. You may want to check with Stu to see if this is correct. The IDR will be reviewing this project next week(Feb. 2). Thanks. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk-(530)538-7153 Fax —(530)538-7785 20-136 Private easement as approved access. The advisory agency may approve a building-free legal access easement as approved access for divisions of one (1) parcel into two (2) lots where the providing of approved access required by this chapter would prevent development of the proposed lot abutting the existing approved access to the property, or where existing development on the proposed lot abutting the existing approved access did not leave enough area to provide approved access to the other lot. Such approval shall be subject to the following conditions: (1)The property shall, prior to division, be within an urban area as designated on appendix I of the design standards. (2)The easement shall serve only one(1)single-family dwelling. (3)A building-free turning area shall be provided on the lot or parcel served by the easement. (4) Maximum length of the easement shall be no more than two hundred (200)feet. (5)The minimum width of the easement shall be twenty (20)feet to be improved as follows:. a. Sixteen (16)feet of gravel roadway with an SC-250 prime coat minimum. b. Four(4)feet reserved for utilities. (6)There shall be a building-free setback of ten (10)feet, measured from the edge of the easement, unless the zoning district in which the property lies requires a greater setback. (7)The parcel abutting the existing approved access shall have a frontage on the existing approved access of a minimum of seventy-five (75)feet. (8)Where possible, the easement shall be located adjacent to the existing driveways on neighboring parcels. (9)A statement shall be placed on the map indicating that the parcel to be served by the easement cannot be divided until an easement or right-of-way is provided, as set forth in section 20-134. (Ord. No. 3188, § 1 (Exh. A), 3-14-95) 1/29/2004 B;utte County Department of Development Services Page 1 of 2 Betts, Steve From: Hill, Rob Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 2:29 PM To: Betts, Steve Subject: Laffins TPM 04-13 Ag Responce Q� To. Butte County Department of Development Services o o PLANNING DIVISION o' , 0 7 County Center Drive o _ . _, o Oroville,CA 95965 o ,r o (530)538-7601 Telephone C0 • (530)538-7785 Facsimile January 23,2004 TO: ENTER AGENCY/DEPARTMENT FROM: Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Ronald & Claudine Laffins,Trustees, Tentative Parcel Map -TPM 04-13 APN: 006-230-047 DATE OF IDR: 2/4/2004 IDR RESPONSE REGARDING COMPLETENESS OF APPLICATION DUE BY: February 2, 2004 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS/MITIGATION MEASURES DUE BY: February 19, 2004 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, to be determined at the Inter-Departmental Review (IDR) Committee meeting on 2/4/2004, and/or to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map application to divide a 34,939 square foot parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet PROJECT LOCATION: on the east side of the Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, at 2862 Esplanade, Chico COUNTY SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO.: 3 ZONING: C-2 (General Commercial) GENERAL PLAN: C (Commercial) If a response cannot be submitted prior to the due dates listed above,please call Stephen Betts at (530) 538-7153 or send him an e-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for 5/27/2004 before the Planning 1/30/2004 hyutte County Department of Dlopment Services Page 2 of 2 Commission. IDR COMMITTEE —APPLICATION COMPLETE: ❑ No lease send response to sbettsAbuttecounty.net by February 2 2004 X Yes (Conditions/mitigation measures due by February 19, 2004)• K:\Planning\Projects\CommentRequestForrn.dot 1/30/2004 0 Butte County Department of Development Services PLANNING DIVISION o�V T rFo 7 County Center Drive o 0 Oroville,CA 95965 0 0 (530)538-7601 Telephoneo —�`=� o (530)538-7785 Facsimile January 23,2004 CDU N'�y TO: ENTER AGENCY/DEPARTMENT FROM: Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Ronald & Claudine Laffins,Trustees, Tentative Parcel Map -TPM 04-13 APN: 006-230-047 DATE OF IDR: 2/4/2004 IDR RESPONSE REGARDING COMPLETENESS OF APPLICATION DUE BY: February 2, 2004 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS/MITIGATION MEASURES DUE BY: February 19, 2004 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, to be determined at the Inter-Departmental Review (IDR) Committee meeting on 2/4/2004, and/or to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map application to divide a 34,939 square foot. parcel into one parcel of 16,914 square feet and one parcel of 18,025 square feet PROJECT LOCATION: on the east side of the Esplanade, approximately 570 feet north of Lassen Avenue, at 2862 Esplanade, Chico COUNTY SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO.: 3 ZONING: C-2 (General Commercial) GENERAL PLAN: C (Commercial) If a response cannot be submitted prior to the due dates listed above,please call Stephen Betts at (530) 538-7153 or send him an e-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for 5/27/2004 before the Planning Commission. IDR COMMITTEE —'APPLICATION COMPLETE: ❑ No (Please send response to sbetts@buttecounty.net by February 2, 2004 ) X Yes (Conditions/mitigation measures due by February 19, 2004) K:\Planning\Projects\ConunentRequestForm.dot Clear Day - Page 1 of 1 � r Durling, Carl From: Benedict, Gwyn Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 1:45 PM To: Durling, Carl Subject: Laffins TPM 04-13 Hey Carl, ` Is Laffins TPM 04-13 still an active project? If they are this is your stop work notice; because they are below the-25% level on their deposit. They currently owe $86.96, so I will be sending an invoice for $1086.96; if in fact you are still currently working on it. I checked Access and the file location states that you have it and that you are still working on it. Please let me know. Thank you, Gwyn 9/14/2005 Page 1 of 1 ��,, Durling, Carl From: Benedict, Gwyn Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 3:22 PM To: Durling, Carl ,M Subject: RE: Laffins TPM 04-13 I will be sending out an invoice in the amout of$831.35, that will bring their account back up to $1000.00. Thank you for the notification! Keep up the good work. Gwyn From: Durling, Carl Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 1:49 PM To: Benedict, Gwyn Subject: Laffins TPM 04-13 ,; µ Gwyn Laffins is below the 25% cut-off. Please check to be sure, then let me know what the billing amount is and you can send the bill and I'll call. Thanks, -�•-°� Carl <�. . 7/8/2005 i Wednesday,July 13,2005 Development Services PLANNING DIVISION ver. 1.0 ` Counter — --- DDS Planning — $831.35 Person Chris - (General Fund) Payment Date 7/12/2005 Public Works $0.00 (Land Development) Receipt Number 434513 Environmental Health $0.00 Received From Laffins, Ronald CDF(Fire Department) j $0.00 NOD/NOE ; $0.00 Applicant Same (Recording Fee) - - — — — - Aunt Minnie Application Number +TPM 04-13 $1, 500 or$2,000 or In Reference To Planning Review/EIR i $0.00 Parcel Number 1006-230-047 _ - - Fish/Game $0.00 Check Number/Cash :1431Ax ' ALUC $0.00 (Airport Land Use) Total Received ! - $83.1 .35 Non Sufficient i $0.00 --- - �- --- Funds ($25.00 Fee) I _ _ __ � p Total Fees; �— $8131.35 �L} Cell Tower $0.00 \ 1($2500.00) 1'_ Public Sales/Copies $0.00 Other: $0.00 v 01 COUNTY OF BUTTE OFFICIAL RECEIPT 434513 OFFICE O DEP�A~RTMENT ISSUING RECEIPT (� 20 Received from A �� 4 F , C The Sum of $ For Received: r Received By. CASH Title CHECK W# 831. �5 By DAVCO BUSINESS FORMS•(530)743-8511 Forth 84702 ------'- ----gyp----—--___--_..—-----' --•--'-- -...---- __�—_._,—-v—_..-..__..._�'---J--��.___I RONALD J. LAFFINs 1431 RENTAL ACCOUNT PH. 89 325 CA 3255 CANYONNOAKS TERRACE 7 90-4202i121I CHICO,CA 95928 . DATE / 12 oS s , PAY - - , TO THE $ .�37 3s - , ORDER OF �J 1 ►1� Q�S2 O 3�_�--- DOLLARS 8 �w Buffe Community Bank 237 W.EZAV •CHfCO.CA 95926•(53018992347 FOR . — 4-0-11 =�--— —------ NIP II800 14 3 LII' is L 2 L 14 20 2 51:0 600 i 3 68 5 ?lI 0 - Butte County Department of Development Services T Administration-AR �U TF 7 County Center Drive °o Oroville,CA 95965 0 o (530)538-7601 Telephone o -1p. �Z o c0U N�y Tentative Parcel Map File: TPM 04-13 APN: 006-230-047 Applicant: Ronald &Claudine Laffins Date:July 8,2005 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace Chico, CA 95928 INVOICE TPM 04-13 Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice,the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program. There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program,and are not reflected N on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed,you Z will receive a FINAL INVOICE. W N The following DISBURSMENTS have been applied towards your DEPOSIT(s): tY M Deposit Disbursement Detail: Deposit Date: January 15,2004 Environmental Health $ 231.50 Receipt: 394710 Land Development $ 290.00 FU- Total Payment: $1,686.50 CDF/Fire Department $ 129.00 N NOD/NOE Filing Fee $ 36.00 O DEVELOP.SVCS-PLANNING DEPOSIT: $ •1,000.00 a LU o TOTAL DISBURSMENT TO DATE: $ 1,686.50 The following CHARGES have been applied towards processing of your application: as of: July 8,2005 cn Professional Planner $ 1,336.28 O CL Administrative/Clerical $ 118.47 W p Publication $ 116.75 N Mapping $ - Z PLANNING CHARGES TO.DATE: $ 1,571.50 Q W TOTAL PLANNING DEPOSITS: $ 1,740.15 CD TOTAL BILLABLE CHARGES: $ (1,571.50) = Remaining Deposit on Account $ (168.65) U RE-DEPOSIT NOW DUE: $ 831.35 to continue processing of this application Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees;deposits; billing procedures: County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to an amount equal to 25%of the original deposit, no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore a LIJ balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit,or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event the applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application,the application will be denied. F-- Z Make checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the'above address. you have an C) Should y y questions,please call Accounts Receivable between 8:00 a.m.to 4 p.m.,Monday through Friday. a AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE BY: i� \ Biller:GLB July 25, 2005 $ (831.35 K:IFISCAL ADMINIBILLINGS&REFUNDW005 invoiceslt.afrins.TPM 04-13 7-8-05 /✓v 431./663 COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROVILLE, CA ATR NO 70687 RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BAG f 316 DATE 112012004 FUND FUND DEP17 ACCT CASH DESCRIP71ON TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DAT E: 146 RECEIPTS: 394700-710 PLANNING APDL FEES GENL 0010 44MOI 42109M 101001 i'mum Project Nun, ber Amount of Fee M336-300-038 W Roberts PRED 04-14 $59 4047A50-1221 Engineering(3r FRED 04-15 $59 #006-'?30-047 R L3ffins TPM 04-13 $1,000 LAND DEVELOPMENT GENL (1010 44=4 4611700 101001 440.Go Pmjeat Number Amount of Fee #035-300-036 W RobertsTRED 04-14 $75 #Q47-150-122 Engineering Gr PREF-0+-15 $75 03015-230-047 P La ins TF-14,04-13 $290 ENVIRONMENTAL HLT'H GEML 0010 54OLIM 4614901 4 1100 363.510 Pmjed Number An ount.of Fee #035-300-038M RobertsTRED 04-14 $61 #047-150-122 Engineering Gr GRED 04-16 $85 400-230-047RLaffins"rPM04-13 $231.50 FIRE PLNG ADPL FEE FIRE PROTECT 01W 4617240 101001 215.L-0 Project Number - Amount of Fee #0FRED 04-14 35-30D-036 W Roberts $43 #0<17-16Q-162 Engineering Gr FRED Q4-1,,5 $43 Mr05-230-047 R Laffins TPM 04--i3 $129 INODINOE CLEWS FILING FE GENL- 0010 47WO1 4G'1 3i9 101001 3.6-00 (M) Project Number Amount of Fee R LaiffinsTPWI 0440 $3G f TOTAL $ 21M.50 APPROVED BY- RECEIVED BY-- AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TREASURER By: white:--treasurer piniv--audd-or aanarr--deposftor goEden rad=filk- 40 <7 COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERWICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OI GC gLLE. CA ATFL NO 70687 RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BAC 0 316 DATE I12W2004 FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT GATE: 146 RECEIPTS: 394..708-710 PLANNING APDL FEES 7 GENL 0010 440001 4210900 101001 1,1a4.E3i<b Project Number Amount of Fee #036-300-036 W Rohett.s FRED 04--14 $50 #047-150-122 Engineering Cr FRED 04-15 $69 9.006-230-047 R Dins TPM GA-13 LAID DEVELOPMENT GENL 0010 44M4 461a 1700 101001 44Cs.eta Project Number Amount of Fee *335-30M36W Ft RED 04-14 $75 #047-150-1222 Engineering Gr FRED04-15 2.75 #009-230-047 R Limns TPM 04-13 $290 EN%,gR011MENTA.L I-ILTH GENL fx{`19 AWG 4614901 1040D'€ 3M. PrDject Number Amount.of Fee #435-300-038MRoberts FRED 04-14 $50 #447-150-112 Engineering Gr GRED 04-1:5 x;68 4000Q30-047 R Laffins TPM 04-13 $231.50 FIRE PL NG APPL FEE FIRE PROTECT €31. 1 4617240 i0aL�11 215-00 Project IkIumber __ Amount of Fee #05-300-£.336 WRoberts FRED{x-14 $443 — #447-150-162 Engineering i,r FRED Q4 15 X43 MV 05-23G-047 R Lams TPM 04•-13 $129 INODIMOE CLERK'S FILING FE GENL C016 470001 4GI 319 101001 36-00 ( ) Project Number Amount of Fee #006-230-047 R Larifins TPhA 64-13 TOTAL 2fl 2.50 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR-CONTROLLER OL.LER TREASURER D By:- white-treasurer pirslc=auddor, gccdenrad.=fils 4 ..-- s-r Friday,January 16,2004 Development Services PLANNING DIVISION ver. 1.0 Counter ___ DDS Planning $1,000.00 , Tie Person amm (General Fund) Payment Date 1/15/2004 Public Works _ $290.00 (Land Development) Receipt Number 394710 Environmental Health $231.50 Received From RONALD J. LAFFINS ' CDF(Fire Department) $129.00 Applicant SAME NOD/NOE $36.00 (Recording Fee) Aunt Minnie $0.00 Application Number TPM 04-13 $1,500 or$2,000 or In Reference To _— _ Planning Review/EIR $0.00 Parcel Number 006-230-047 Fish/Game $0.00 Check Number/Cash 1053 - ALUC $0.00 Total Received (Airport Land Use) $1 ,.686.50 Non Sufficient $0.00 Total Fees - $1 ,686.50 Funds ($25.00 Fee) _ Cell Tower $0.00 ($2500.00) Public Sales/Copies $0.00 Other: _ $0.00 i s III '� _ - I`ft:[�'"`�-`'-_'Y'+` 1��K3�"t�'r' .`�L�' ,�3i�'d•._Y -�: `� 'i�'3fi?x-.K•�.::.c��9 .+�_.�•��-u.'''1�� S _ ,ti�+�' s{1L'�,o�" S'w - } -�+ - �' si �y',>:P S'2iy -�',`x• Y:�- r[ t'SS' ��-�j . p. {:}.(y ,, i�++{'t'is..• fsf• ,, ,t u�'1(' C R' �e . . RONAIDeJ LAFFINS U � �j � � � f, . k u „, 'W RENTALACCOUNT` �} r __..Y _4,5 3 , ' 82•,FAtRWAdf�DR�.,,, � ,� �; ,� ��, .� �, �. ' �CFIICO�CA95928 ';� Date. s ,5. ,10111 WE WIR 1_ . d ;� W. Env rF5` -p4P"•iu i�c�'ssrFK;any - • �.-�: ' �I r5� S�r , � JC� �- �, �-�3 � ollars_• ' i [�e 'r>Jc2+irY ^q �' c„in .h :u�.;_ rcy `2' .s y;. •a GT ( Ril{/A .. • .�t•aee-etettltrE� � �,��. des "''� �•�''� ��'^' a' �e-i ' • sa.eewe■r<ew■r reNu •ceico���or9 s ,� i,, ��"`��„� �`•� a � ,'�•� FOY �'3WK ------------- '*,i W*`'s { `.x�iS `. G• .xg mac' Fye c _rs 5 k ,�.f. w S _. r. hp. . e x a r smart{ T 4a Aga y CY k �i a 7 rz y ra f ■f '�`a •r's" fir. # ■ •h' ,� �y '�, v. { .3` 's3�5'� �. `� a�gz •�''�L i h�+'�,;3r'�e-r'c".�.z•J + - - - .r• - �max- e .� 2� � ■ � ,x a �' a x� ..G -r ' .,.. " a,� �..i4 � -m J.$;.'` �aYr'r fi •�'3 -:c.r 'z�y.S#, � ''� � -[�..,�,. �'s.,r• �-• a '�T' r-,.j`-",��5�• '�`�` a.-. ,k��>,��_-�-1i'.�.'�.�r�.. t ::�'.�:a..a..�_�saa:..x_'•': .&w`�',r„i'<..�.�...+'�'P'`'�.s�.,. .r-t'.�'�.J...'�'.e>xY��� :�rr3«'�,�,`N•u'�E�� �.r�..a<.L-..�z-. .. .. ry.:,:;,_...,,;r_..,-yr. •"M Y"'n L3<%f.Y�'- '. ;. :.ir_t 'za"y"r. ..:c',�`!""� '„' -a^',z'.+., :p •�'� -+.y-,.-_.,..��,,:y;- y . .. .• �riawi'G'.-•i�..--_ .-_ ..._r?.�.y +i.f.'f' .$'.Y.J. u'-ac a-. ...��rxi'.+e�•:.... �a�fy �4f:..�!:;�'w -... �!+' . ,,COUNTY OF BUTTE 394710 t / , OFFICIAL RECEIPT . .... j OFFICE OR DEPA1RTMEIV7 ISSUING RECEIPT Received from Ile Sum of For �f�' r � ff���'/. i , i J, ;� L Received 7 (��`-'-7"(, 7 ) j Receiver /� ` � ''2/� � c� d By � %�=� ' CASH tt Title` ,CHECK 1C. By DAVCO BUSINESS FORMS•(530)743.8511 Form 75702 County of Butte Oroville,California GENERAL CLAIM CLAIMANT: Ronald Laffins 3 Sd ADDRESS: 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace 3/ g/ O CITY&STATE: Chico, CA 95928 DATE OF CLAIM: February 16,2006 SUMBIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES DATE RECM DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM(DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY) AMOUNT REFUND CLAIM-ATR#86389, Receipt#434513,Check#1431 : Project was annexed to the City of Chico. Application, _TPM 04=13--7 PAID RETAINED REFUND Development Services $ 831.35 $ - $ 831.35 Land Development $ - $ - $ - Environmental Health $ - $ - $ - CDF/Fire $ - $ - $ - Agricultural Department $ - $ - $ - NOD/NOE Clerk's Filing Fee $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 831.35 $ - $ 831.35 . ................................................ .............. ............. .:.............. :: BREAI DOVy1N BUDGET: ACO(?T NT .:ANTOUNT : ................................................... .............. ............. .............. Development Services 440001 4210900 $ 831.35 it Land Develo pment 440004 4611700 $ - Environmental Health 540003 4614901 $ - CDF/Fire 0100 4617240 $ - Agricultural Department 460001 4312100 $ - t . .. NOD/NOE 470001 4612319 $ TOTAL $ 831.35 $ 831.35 I,the undersigned,declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered,and that this claim is true and correct as stated. Dated this day of 18 2006,at CLAx_k\ -,Calif. I1(C/✓Lo�U d. Signature of Claimant I,the undersigned,hereby certify that,to the best of my knowledge,the services or articles specified above have been performed or delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriation or Specific Board Approval (Check one)for the same. Dated this 2 2 day of ,2006,at Oroville Calif. De rtment Head or Authorized Deputy Dept. SEE Exp. Code BREAKDOWN Code PAYABLE FROM FUND DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-AUDITOR'S USE ONLY DEPT&SUB. PROJ SUB.OBJ CLAIM NO. INV NO. INV.DATE ENCUMB. GROSS AMT. Claimant-Submitted for your approval/signature. Please return signed form to: Development Services Department Accounts Receivable 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 Display Revenue Status Xv OK Return DISPLAY REVENUE STATUS Notes m rm-n_T_nr,_a_/().rl_ IFUND 110010 COUNTY GENERAL FUND YEAR 06 BUDGET- UNIT 11440001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PERIOD 9 ACCOUNT 4210900 PLANNING APPLICATIONS TRANS CODE 21 JPROJ/TAS TRANS DATE 03/08/06 ACCT DATE ENTERED 03/08/06 CASH ACCOUNT 101001 TREASURY CASH DUE DATE 03/08/06 VENDOR T26869 jRONALD LAFFINS INVOICE DATE RECEIVABLE ACCT DISCOUNT AMT 0.00 DISBURSE FUND 1505 CO WARRANTS CLRNG F 1505 CHECK NUMBER 713750 JENCUMBRANCE 110 CHECK DATE 03/08/06 3 E NUMBER PARTIAL/FINAL INVOICE/RECEIPT RCPT434513 1099, N - AMOUNT 831. 351 CLEARED SALES/USE TAX 0.001 0.00 VOID DESCRIPTION REFND PERMIT TPM04-13 CONTROL NO L5 ENTERED BY kathleen BANK CODE WARRANT NO NOTES ?N CLICK 'OK' TO CONTINUED COPY Butte County Department of Development Services QTrF TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO,ASSISTANT DIRECTOR o 0 0 0 7 County Center Drive 0 _ _ 0 Oroville, CA 95965 0 -J�=--'�� o (530) 538-7601 Telephone .� DUN (530) 538-7785 Facsimile 'S www.buttecountV.net ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * PLANNING February 16, 2006 Ronald Laffins 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace Chico, CA 95928 RE: Planning Project No. TPM 04-13 APN# 006-230-047 On July 12, 2005, a deposit was made in the amount of $831.35, of which $0.00 was retained. The remaining fees will be reimbursed to you. Please sign, date, and return the enclosed claim form to this office. Once we receive the claim form, we will then process your refund in the amount of$831.35. Should you have any. questions, please contact this office Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at (530) 538-7601. Sincerely, Diane Lewellen Account Clerk, Senior Administrative Division enclosure Proj#TPM 04-13: ltr r ,•,�„�,�, c-. �I 4 • • County of Butte Oroville,California GENERAL CLAIM CLAIMANT: Ronald Laffins ADDRESS: 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace CITY&STATE: Chico, CA 95928 DATE OF CLAIM: February 16,2006 SUMBIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES DATE REVC DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM(DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY) AMOUNT REFUND CLAIM-ATR#86389, Receipt#434513,Check#1431 :Project was annexed to the City of Chico. Application # TPM 04-13 PAID RETAINED REFUND Development Services $ 831.35 $ - $ 831.35 Land Development $ - $ - $ - Environmental Health $ - $ - $ - CDF/Fire $ - $ - $ - Agricultural Department $ - $ - $ - NOD/NOE Clerk's Filing Fee $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 831.35 $ - $ 831.35 . ................................................ .............. ............. ............... ::::: ..DA AKDS:�VyNi :B:UDGET: AGCQ[INT ::A11�It?l F�iT ................................................... .............. ............. .............. Development Services 440001 4210900 $ 831.35 it Land Development 440004 4611700 $ - Environmental Health 540003 4614901 $ - CDF/Fire 0100 4617240 $ - Agricultural Department 460001 4312100 $ - NOD/NOE 470001 4612319 $ TOTAL $ 831.35 $ 831.35 I,the undersigned,declare under penalty of pedury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered,and that this claim is true and correct as stated. Dated this day of ,2006,at Calif. Signature of Claimant I,the undersigned,hereby certify that,to the best of my knowledge,the services or articles specified above have been performed or delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriation or Specific Board Approval (Check one)for the same. Dated this day of 2006,at Oroville Calif. Department Head or Authorized Deputy Dept. SEE Exp. Code BREAKDOWN Code PAYABLE FROM FUND DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-AUDITOR'S USE ONLY DEPT&SUB. PROJ SUB.OBJ CLAIM NO. INV NO. INV.DATE ENCUMB. GROSS AMT. Claimant-Submitted for your approvallsignature. Please return signed form to: Development Services Department Accounts Receivable 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 ti County of Butte, ass=iY; ;t- Oroville,California GENERAL CLAIM CLAIMANT: Ronald Laffins 8y4/—1&03 ADDRESS: 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace CITY&STATE: Chico, CA 95928 DATE OF CLAIM: November 16,2005 SUMBIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES DATE REC'C DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM(DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY) AMOUNT REFUND CLAIM-ATR#86389,Receipt#434513,Check#1431 : Project was annexed to the City of Chico. Application# TPM 04-13 PAID RETAINED REFUND Development Services $ 831.35 $ 292.32 $ 539.03 Land Development $ - $ - $ - Environmental Health $ $ $ CDF/Fire $ $ $ Agricultural Department $ $ - $ NOD/NOE Clerk's Filing Fee $ $ - $ - TOTAL $ 831.35 $ 292.32 $ 539.03 :« :« RE RD-0:WN .............. :BYlt Ca✓m: ACCOU:}VT :A1Vt4ilNT . .............................................. .............. ............... Development Services 440001 4210900 $ 539.03 Land Development 440004 4611700 $ - a Environmental Health 540003 4614901 $ CDF/Fire .0100 4617240 $ Agricultural Department 460001 4312100 $ NOD/NOE 470001 4612319 $ TOTAL $ 539.03 $ 539.03 I,the undersigned,declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered,and that this claim is true and correct as stated. Dated this day of 2005,at Calif. Signature of Claimant the undersigned,hereby certify that,to the best of my knowledge,the services or articles specified above have been performed or delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriation or Specific Board Approval (Check one)for the same. Dated this day of 2005,at Oroville Calif. Department Head or Authorized Deputy Dept. SEE Exp. Code BREAKDOWN Code PAYABLE FROM FUND DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-AUDITOR'S USE ONLY DEPT&SUB. PROJ SUB.OBJ CLAIM NO. INV NO. INV.DATE ENCUMB. GROSS AMT. Claimant-Submitted for your approval/signature. Please return signed form to: Development Services Department Accounts Receivable 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 0 0TrF0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 0 www.luttecounty.net/dds of 0 --Wit--_-:-: 0 7 County Center Drive CDUN�� Oroville,CA 95965 (530)538-7601 T (530)538-7785 F ADv iNISTRATION *BUILDING*PLANNING December 1, 2005 Ronald Laffins 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace eNA Chico, CA 95928 RE: Planning Project No. TPM 04-13 APN# 006-230-047 On July 12, 2005, a deposit was made in the amount of$831.35, of which $292.32 was retained. The remaining fees will be reimbursed to you. Please sign, date, and return the enclosed claim form to this office. Once we receive the claim form, we will then process your refund in the amount of$539.03. Should you have any questions, please contact this office Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at (530) 538-7601. Sincerely, Diane Lewellen Account Clerk, Senior. Administrative Division enclosure Proj#TPM 04-13: ltr 1� County of Butte Oroville,California GENERAL CLAIM CLAIMANT: Ronald Laffins ADDRESS: 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace CITY&STATE: Chico, CA 95928 DATE OF CLAIM: December 1,2005 SUMBIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES DATE REC'D DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM(DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY) AMOUNT REFUND CLAIM-ATR#86389,Receipt#434513,Check#1431 :Project was annexed to the City of Chico. Application# TPM 04-13 PAID RETAINED REFUND Development Services $ 831.35 $ 292.32 $ 539.03 Land Development $ - $ - $ - Environmental Health $ $ - $ - CDF/Fire $ $ - $ - Agricultural Department $ $ - $ - NOD/NOE Clerk's Filing Fee $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 831.35 $ 292.32 $ 539.03 .............. ............. ............... $REAKDOVVN :RTJDGET': ACCOUNT ::A-MOUNT: :.:................................................. .............. ............. .............. Development Services 440001 4210900 $ 539.03 Land Development 440004 4611700 $ - z Environmental Health 540003 4614901 $ - CDF/Fire 0100 4617240 $ - Agricultural Department 460001 4312100 $ - NOD/NOE 470001 4612319 $ - TOTAL $ 539.03 $ 539.03 1,the undersigned,declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered,and that this claim is true and correct as stated. Dated this day of 2005,at Calif. Signature of Claimant I,the undersigned,hereby certify that,to the best of my knowledge,the services or articles specified above have been performed or delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriation or Specific Board Approval (Check one)for the same. Dated this day of 2005,at Oroville Calif. Department Head or Authorized Deputy Dept. SEE Exp. Code BREAKDOWN Code PAYABLE FROM FUND DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-AUDITOR'S USE ONLY DEPT&SUB. PROJ SUB.OBJ CLAIM NO. INV NO. INV.DATE ENCUMB. GROSS AMT. Claimant-Submitted for your approval/signature. Please return signed form to: Development Services Department Accounts Receivable 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 • 11/15/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:52 PM Pre-Bill Worksheet / Page 1 n � J Nickname TPM 04-13 Laffins v Full Name Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees Address 3255 Canyon Oak-Terrace � ) Chico CA 95928 Business Fax ( 2 t Home (530) 894-1603 Other In Ref To 6 3\7\7 Notes ?1-7;0 Date Employee V[ Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 1/20/2004 Roni 34.00 0.37 12.64 Billable 2913 Initial Processing - Clerical Input, initial clerical processing of application. 1/26/2004 Roni 34.00 0.83 28.31 Billable 2962 Initial Processing - Clerical Input, initial clerical processing of application. 1/15/2004 Steve 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 2999 Circulation - Planner Took in new application 1/20/2004 Steve 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable 3000 Circulation - Planner Determine an application's completeness/circulate for staff comments/analysis. 1/23/2004 Steve 59.00 0.42 24.58 Billable 3001 CEQA Worked on the initial study 2/4/2004 Steve 59.00 0.33 19.67 Billable 3102 Meeting - Planner IDR meeting 2/5/2004 Steve 59.00 0.42 24.58 Billable 3103 Correspondence - Planner Incomplete letter to RAR 3/11/2004 Steve 59.00 1.75 103.25 Billable 3530 CEQA Worked on initial study 3/17/2004 Steve 59.00 0.67 39.33 Billable 3586 CEQA Worked on the initial study 3/18/2004 Steve 59.00 1.33 78.67 Billable 3591 CEQA Worked on initial study. E-mailed it to JB. • 11/15/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:52 PM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 2 TPM 04-13:Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time- DNB Amt 3/17/2004 Steve 59.00 0.67 39.33 Billable 3592 CEQA Worked on the initial study 4/16/2004 Joe 59.00 0.39' 22.80 Do Not Bill 3923 Management Review 0.39 22.80 - Management Review- Initial Study 6/4/2004 Steve 59.00 0.07 3.93 Billable 4254 Phone Calls/Counter- Planner Phone conservation w/Ken Skillman - RAR a 6/4/2004 Steve 59.00 0.12 6.88 Billable 4258 CEQA E-mail to JB with IS attached. 7/1/2004 Joe 59.00 0.05 3.03 Do Not Bill 4682 Management Review 0.05 3.03 Management Review - Initital Study 8/24/2004 Cheryl 45.00 0.05 2.25 Billable 5446 Administrative-Clerical Time spent on billing and other administrative tasks not related to processing . 9/7/2004 Steve 59.00 1.42 83.58 Billable 5619 CEQA Prepare neg dec notice, copies for SCH, SCH form, and addresses 9/8/2004 Roni 34.00 0.34 11.60 Billable 5631 Publication - Clerical Time spent preparing & publishing for CEQA related to applicant. 10/13/2004 Steve 59.00 0.78 46.22 Billable 6109 Report &/or Project Analysis Worked on agenda report 10/13/2004 Steve 59.00 0.67 39.33 Billable 6110 Report &/or Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 10/14/2004 Cheryl 45.00 0.33 15.00 Billable 6131 Administrative-Clerical Time spent on billing and other administrative tasks not related to processing . 11/15/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:52 PM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 3 TPM 04-13:Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 10/18/2004 Steve 59.00 1.92 113.08 Billable 6174 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 11/16/2004 Steve 59.00 0.37 21.63 Billable 6656 Report Wor Project Analysis Made changes to agenda report per SS and e-mailed it to RT for dist. to IDR. 12/2/2004 Steve 59.00 0.42 24.58 Billable 6778 Meeting - Planner OR review of agenda report 12/6/2004 Cheryl 45.00 0.07 3.00 Billable 6837 Administrative-Clerical Time spent on billing and other administrative tasks not related to processing . 5/10/2005 Carl 59.00 1.14 67.39 Billable 8594 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 5/16/2005 Carl 59.00 1.92 113.17 Billable 8649 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 5/17/2005 Carl 59.00 0.59 35.04 Billable 8682 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. Reviewed project re road easement. 5/23/2005 Carl 59.00 0.79 46.51- Billable 8740 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 6/8/2005 Carl 59.00 0.76 44.86 Billable 8914 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 6/9/2005 Carl 59.00 1.89 111.54 Billable 8923 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. Email to YC re PW change in position. 11/15/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:52 PM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 4 i TPM 04-13:Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 6/10/2005 Carl 59.00 0.58 34.42 Billable 8939 Report &/or Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 7/7/2005 Carl 59.00 1.64 96.74 Billable 9216 Report &/or Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 7/8/2005 Carl b 59.00 1.25 73.72 Billable 9217 Report &/or Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. . 7/8/2005 Gwyn 137.00 0.33 45.67 Billable 9225 Administrative-Clerical Time spent on billing and other administrative tasks not related to processing . 7/11/2005 Carl 59.00 2.05 120.98 Billable 9230 Report &/or Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 8/15/2005 Carl 59.00 4.66 274.89 Billable 9576 Report &/or Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 8/16/2005 Carl 59.00 0.38 22.49 Billable 9585 Report &/or Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 9/7/2005 Carl 59.00 0.36 21.50 Billable 9728 Report &/or Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 10/3/2005 Carl 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable 9929 Report &/or Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. Confirmed that property annexed to City of Chico. 10/3/2005 Sherry 35.00 0.18 6.36 Billable 9934 Publication - Clerical Time spent preparing & publishing for Hearing related to applicant. TOTAL Billable Fees 32.87 $1,915.72 Do Not Bill 0.44 $25.83 r 11/15/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:52 PM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 5 TPM 04-13:Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees (continued) Date Employee Price Quantity Amount Total ID Expense Markup % 9/13/2004 PUBLISH 116.75 1.000 116.75 Billable 5636 Publishing Expense Publish in Chico ER 9/13/04 F05-052 10/6/2005 PUBLISH 0.00 1.000 0.00 Billable 9928 Publishing Expense Publish in Newspaper- Oroville Mercury - F06-072 - 10/06-05 TOTAL Billable Costs $116.75 Amount Total Total of Fees (Time Charges) $1,915.72 Total of Costs (Expense Charges) $116.75 Total new charges $2,032.47 Accounts Receivables DatejID Type Description 1/15/2004 CRIED Credit ($1,000.00) 504 Receipt #394710. Check #1053 1/15/2004 INV Invoice $36.00 505 1/15/2004 CRED Credit NOD/NOE Recording Fee ($36.00) 506 Receipt #394710. Check #1053 11/2/2004 PAY Payment ($740.15) 1194 Receipt #413140 7/12/2005 PAY ' Payment - Receipt #434513 ($831.35) 1973 ATR# 86389 Total Accounts Receivable ($ 1.50) - Total New Balance ($539.03) Funds Account: Default Previous account balance $1,686.50 11/15/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:52 PM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 6 TPM 04-13:Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees (continued) Employee Summary Employee Rate Hours Charges Slip Value Adjustment SB 58.87 12.11 $712.89 $712.89 0.00 CD 59.04 18.26 $1,078.00 $1,078.00 0.00 CAS 45.00 0.45 $20.25 $20.25 0.00 SV 35.33 0.18 $6.36 $6.36 0.00 GLB 138.39 0.33 $45.67 $45.67 0.00 RT 34.12 1.54 $52.55 $52.55 0.00 Project No: 1 C4 APN:Applicant: Issued: Issued: Renewal Date: Date Description Amount Receipt Check# S R y i i �• .. .. • � S � _. '�t Forest Floor Page 1 of 2 Lewellen, Diane From: DeBrunner, Deborah Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 10:31 AM To: Benedict, Gwyn; Foots, Alise; Lewellen, Diane; McMillan, Kim; Richardson, Lynn; Strand, Myles; Viernes, Sherry Subject: FW: TPM 04-13 Laffins - Refund Issue .FYI. � Deboralh DeBrunner Manager, Program Development Development Services (530) 538-7464 Fax 538-7785 From: DeBrunner, Deborah Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 10:30 AM To: Snellings, Tim; Calarco, Pete Cc: Breedon, Dan; Durling, Carl Subject: TPM 04-13 Laffins Refund Issue .i Mr. Laffins came in to dispute the amount of a refund we were processing for his project. On October 5, 2005 -.M.r. .La.ffins was notified by hi.s engineer that Car.] Durling had called them on October 4th and infornned them that Mr. .Laffins parcel.snap site had been.annexed into the City of Chico on July 6th and the County would no longer process th.e.neap and advised Mr. Laffins should apply for a refund of remaini.n.g :fees. Mr. Laffins and-his engineer did .not.know of the annexation until in.fo.rmed,about.it by Carl Durli.ng. Mr. Laffins is contending that we should not be billing him:for work done after the July 6th annexation, we shouldn't have been working on the project. Carl spend 10.59 hours after 7/6 or$625.07 billable on the project and clerical spent $6.36 billable a total of $631.4-3. (This is an older project, billed at the old hourly rates.) There is a$45.67 clerical billing charge done on 7/8 - which would stand. Should we have known.about the annexation and stopped work asMr. Laffins contends? If the answer.is yes, .1. feel.Mr. Laffins is correct. If the answer.is no, we could not have been expected.to know, what do you think we should do? I i.nl.b med Mr. Laffins I would address this .issue with you all and get back to h.iin nex veel�Please let me f you need..niore ifornlation to make a detenninati.o.n.as to how to handle this .tuation. Deborah DeBrunner 12/8/2005 Forest Floor AQ, Page 2 of 2 Manager;Progra.m..Developmei .Butte County Department of.Developmeut Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7464 FAX 538-7785 12/8/2005 15 November 2005 Property was annexed to City of Chico. County no longer has jurisdiction. Forwarded this file to finance staff to close file and make any refund allowed. ACTIVITY LOG CDurling: TPM 04-13 Laffins 28APRO5 File transferred to Carl from Betts. Revised site plan and exception letter received. 081_-_p04 IS sent to OPR. IOMAY05 Left message with Ken at RA&R to update me on project re status of IS. 11MAY05 Ken to pick up IS, review, then sign. 12MayO5 Ken returned IS signed. 20MayO5 Steve Betts said the IS had already been reivewed by OPR. 09JunO5 Sent email to YC re apparent change in PW position. Want clarification as to our position of either revert to denial or continue with approval report. YC forwarded my email to Mike Crump. 10Jun05 Stu Edell responded to Mike Crump re my email. 08JUL05 In reviewing the file, and preparing the finished draft report Betts started, I find no supporting reasoning from EnvHlth to require connection to City Sewer. All facilities and buildings are already in existence. Emailed Cliff Bottenfield requesting information supporting requirement. 11JUL05 Cliff from EnvHlth emailed to say that connection to City Sewer is required under Appendix VII. Modified report. However, EnvHlth's original Pre-development review letter says there are no conditions required. Emailed draft report to SS for review. 08JUL05 Project is in arrears on fees. Hold until fees are paid. 02augO5 Streeter emailed comments on agenda report. 09AUG05 Notified by Sherry this date that fees were paid on 21JUL05. Restarted project work. 15AUG05 Finished report for final condition check, and review by Jim. 15AUG05 Made changes proposed by Jim and forwarded PDF file to Sherry for IDR final condition check. 07SEP05 IDR determined that significant revisions needed to be made to the report. Also, need full Title Report, lot book info not adequate. 12SEP05 Laffins on hold for additional deposit. 030CT05 Found out today that the property was annexed to the City of Chico on 06 July 05. Spoke with applicant's representive Ken Skillman of Rolls Anderson And Rolls. He said he would get back to me. County no longer has jurisdiction to process application. CLOSE FILE i Tuesday,July 12,2005 Development Services PLANNING DIVISION ver. 1.0 Counter ----- — - DDS Planning $831.35 Person Chris (General Fund) Payment Date 7/12/2005 Public Works i $0.00 (Land Development) Receipt Number 434513 Environmental Health $0.00 Received From Laffins, Ronald CDF(Fire Department) $0.00 Applicant Same NOD/NOE $0.00 (Recording Fee) _—.. .. Aunt Minnie $0.00 Application Number :TPM 04-13 l $1, 500 or$2,000 or In Reference To --- Planning Review/EIR $0.00 Parcel Number 006-230-047 Fish/Game $0.00 Check Number/Cash '1431 ALUC $0.00 (Airport Land Use) Total:,Received ; $831 -35 Non Sufficient $0.00 -- - -- ---- -- Funds ($25.00 Fee) jotal Fees ; T $83 35 Ceil Tower $0.00 1($2500.00) Public Sales/Copies - $0.00 Other: $0.00 241 V11 I 1111= dRYJ _ - y � � ... �. �:c: .,t r Sr•;c: uY�.:. ',r�,;.���� "r .�'., \,qw...s,4..Y"a' t� G`�r-x3 SL`'' �A�;x' c� r•'` ,�"'...�,#.'�. .; "'Y- rs:n"� N t r .A.ria RONALD J.rLAFFINS ' aENTAL'ACCOUNT k�' ':z i ,��tx� �' r t Ys r r w x ^ 1431 > t'.+` `•` vs��.�. rr e - '}1 a4, !`ek xM•'�r�'4 4 PH. (530);891-5387 • 3255 CANYON OAKS TERRACE ` CHICO,CA;95928 ``.. a< ` sort ah-s »rt*S f „; 'a •,> z 5x ;,� > Ft. Qy .� h y '" r/ -e xS 90 4202/1211 a DATE : PAY 4 r ny a s s r ^Jki Y� r l t, +t� ". �l j �`h s o" r •a e TO THE1`�V�J �• ' e Y i .tear�F ORDER OF .;2 x% .i� .*_ 'n "tv'+'�'•ir�-,x--,.yn "}^,Ir ,>'9^E$ w. f"..`.}i-"- .A �,F ,i,4 s 7 ri� r•yr. w r ' + w . �_ f,t ''�L} '� '�,r,. Si. _�,G^ v"-, ;fit r -- m�r �^ — ,! � ` fl�-e G ("C - V'yc-�p�'�OTII.0--Vim F�'�"z• Y '�t n,.7 1.. r �-�}� -t- � - r y�..m t, • v? 7 -t' ada va +Ysr O �b ^4c fi �-r .9 f ((-•.- D O L y A R S Bilffe, K i r HkN Y P ' •„ A 3 Y....y.�• 'I:.V S' �' F 5 r..� S- Commurnfy* ' ;r l - ^y ,•�. ,r,�'..fY-. Xw7at,T{:,f +�}t�r���'„Fya'v"'•'��`, h�'1',y"`'•�`'.58`.fi• r�qSjr,•��¢vY`�i•Yj rer N~�r�erv y'i�rv3�r�i'giti�Y('l�.t»W �r�3- 4' '`,` ��':ry �,... _;�, 1 si.,�,_- f`r�4 T `Bank,7A�V�E CHID, �23WCA 95926 (530 192307 T FORoms "'� ? __ ti•s�tJ � ,(1i0 �.v i �. .S ��a s, a 11'00 14�3'1u� 1• �:- � �. � - . 1'`2 °l�4 202 Sll: 600;1 COUNTY OF BUTTE 434513 OFFICIAL RECEIPT OFFICE O D TMENT ISSUING RECEIPT 12 2O Received from 44— ' -A T. _ The Sum of Lti Q� $ �� cy For — Received: s` Received By CASH ❑ l6 f Title CHECK IN* $31' 3(5 By DAVCO BUSINESS FORMS•(530)743-8511 Form 84702 r 4P COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROVILLE, CA ATR NO 86389 RECEIVED FROM PLANNING a BAG 0 330 DATE 71/312045 FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: 7113 RECEIPTS: 434513 r—PLANNING APPLFEES _ GENL 0010- 440M1 421WW 1010.01 831.35 Project Number _ Amount of Fee APN:006-23I}-047-RONALD LAFFINS-TPM 0413 $331.35 TOTAL $ 831.33 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED By: AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TREASURER By: By:��-C_�_ white=treasurer pink---auditor canary--depositor golden rod=file 13 I Butte County Department of Development Services Administration-AR o$A3 TT Fo 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 0 ^^�., o (530)538-7601 Telephone o c0U N'�y Tentative Parcel Map File: TPM 04-13 APN: 006-230-047 Applicant: Ronald&Claudine Laffins Date: July 8,2005 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace Chico, CA 95928 INVOICE TPM 04-13 Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice,the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program. There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program,and are not reflected Non this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed,you Z will receive a.FINAL INVOICE. LU N The following DISBURSMENTS have been applied towards your DEPOSIT(s): C13 Deposit Disbursement Detail: Deposit Date: January 15,2004 Environmental Health $ 231.50 Receipt: 394710 Land Development $ 290.00 W Total Payment: $1,686.50 CDF/Fire Department $ 129.00 N NOD/NOE Filing Fee $ 36.00 O DEVELOP.SVCS-PLANNING DEPOSIT: $ 1,000.00 a w TOTAL DISBURSMENT TO DATE: $ 1,686.50 The following CHARGES have been applied towards processing of your application: 11-- as of: July 8,2005 N Professional Planner $ 1,336.28 O W Administrative/Clerical $ 118.47 Publication $ 116.75 Mapping $ Z PLANNING CHARGES TO DATE: $ 1,571.50 Q N TOTAL PLANNING DEPOSITS: $ 1,740.15 W (9 TOTAL BILLABLE CHARGES: $ (1,571.50) Remaining Deposit on Account $ (168.65) V RE-DEPOSIT NOW DUE: $, 831.35 to continue processing of this application Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees;deposits; billing procedures: County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to an amount equal to 25%of the original deposit, no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore a LJJ balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit,or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event the =) applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application,the application will be denied. 0 H Z Make checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address. O Should you have any questions,please call Accounts Receivable between 8:00 a.m.to 4 p.m.,Monday through Friday. Q AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE BY: July 25 2005 831.35 Biller:GLB + � K:\FISCAL ADMIN\BILLINGS&REFUNDS\2005 invoices\Laffins.TPM 04-13 7-M5 7/8/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:59 PM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 1 Nickname Laffins.TPM 04-13 1 TPM 04-13 �.. ✓ �� Full Name Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees Address 3255 Canyon Oak Terrace Chico CA 95928 Business Fax Home (530) 894-1603 Other In Ref To Notes A Date Employee "' GAJ Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 1/20/2004 Rani 34.00 0.37 12.64 Billable 2913 Initial Processing - Clerical Input, initial clerical processing of application. 1/26/2004 Roni 34.00 0.83 28.31 Billable 2962 Initial Processing - Clerical Input, initial clerical processing of application. 1/15/2004 Steve 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 2999 Circulation - Planner Took in new.application 1/20/2004 Steve 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable 3000 Circulation - Planner Determine an application's completeness/circulate for staff comments/analysis. 1/23/2004 Steve 59.00 0.42 24.58 Billable 3001 CEQA Worked on the initial study 2/4/2004 Steve 59.00 0.33 19.67 Billable 3102 Meeting - Planner IDR meeting 2/5/2004 Steve 59.00 0.42 24.58 Billable 3103 Correspondence - Planner Incomplete letter to RAR 3/11/2004 Steve 59.00 1.75 103.25 Billable 3530 CEQA - Worked on initial study 3/17/2004 Steve 59.00 0.67 39.33 Billable 3586 CEQA Worked on the initial study 3/18/2004 Steve 59.00 1.33 78.67 Billable 3591 CEQA Worked on initial study. E-mailed it to JB. I � f •7/8/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:59 PM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 2 Laffins.TPM 04-13:Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 3/17/2004 Steve 59.00 0.67 39.33 Billable 3592 CEQA Worked on the initial study 4/16/2004 Joe 59.00 0.39 22.80 Do Not Bill 3923 Management.Review 0.39 22.80 Management Review - Initial Study 6/4/2004 Steve 59.00 0.07 3.93 Billable 4254 Phone Calls/Counter- Planner Phone conservation w/Ken Skillman - RAR 6/4/2004 Steve 59.00 0.12 6.88 Billable 4258 CEQA E-mail to JB with IS attached. 7/1/2004 Joe 59.00 0.05 3.03 Do Not Bill 4682 Management Review 0.05 3.03 Management Review - Initital Study 8/24/2004 Cheryl . 45.00 0.05 2.25 Billable 5446 Administrative-Clerical Time spent on billing and other administrative tasks not related to processing . 9/7/2004 Steve 59.00 1.42 83.58 Billable 5619 CEQA Prepare neg dec notice, copies for SCH, SCH form, and addresses 9/8/2004 Roni 34.00 0.34 11.60 Billable 5631 Publication - Clerical Time spent preparing & publishing for CEQA related to applicant. 10/13/2004 Steve 59.00 0.78 46.22 Billable 6109 Report &/or Project Analysis Worked on agenda report 10/13/2004 Steve 59.00 0.67 39.33 Billable 6110 Report &/or Project Analysis Reports.and/or project analysis related to the application. 10/14/2004 Cheryl 45.00 0.33 15.00 Billable 6131 Administrative-Clerical Time spent on billing and other administrative tasks not related to processing . 7/8/2005 Butte County Department of'Development Services 2:59 PM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 3 Laffins.TPM G4-13:Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 10/18/2004 Steve 59.00 1.92 113.08 Billable 6174 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 11/16/2004 Steve 59.00 0.37 21.63 Billable 6656 Report Wor Project Analysis Made changes to agenda report per SS and e-mailed it to RT for dist. to OR. 12/2/2004 Steve 59.00 0.42 24.58 Billable 6778 Meeting - Planner IDR review of agenda report 12/6/2004 Cheryl 45.00 0.07 3.00 Billable 6837 Administrative-Clerical Time spent on billing and other administrative tasks not related to processing . 5/10/2005 Carl 59.00 1.14 67.39 Billable 8594 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 5/16/2005 Carl 59.00 1.92 113.17 Billable 8649 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 5/17/2005 Carl 59.00 0.59 35.04 Billable 8682 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. Reviewed project re road easement. 5/23/2005 Carl 59.00 0.79 46.51 Billable 8740•Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 6/8/2005 Carl 59.00 0.76 44.86 Billable . 8914 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 6/9/2005 Carl 59.00 1.89 111.54 Billable 8923 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. Email to YC re PW change in position. 7/8/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:59 PM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 4 Laffins.TPM 04-13:Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 6/10/2005 Carl 59.00 0.58 34.42 Billable 8939 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 7/7/2005 Carl 59.00 1.64 96.74 Billable 9216 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 7/8/2005 Carl '59.00 1.25 73.72 Billable 9217 Report Wor Project Analysis Reports and/or project analysis related to the application. 7/8/2005 Gwyn 137.00 0.33 45.67 Billable 9225 Administrative-Clerical Time spent on billing and other administrative tasks not related to processing . TOTAL Billable Fees 24.99 $1,454.75 Do Not'Bill 0.44 $25.83 Date Employee Price Quantity Amount Total ID Expense Markup % 9/13/2004 PUBLISH 116.75, 1.000 116.75 Billable 5636 Publishing Expense Publish in Chico ER 9/13/04 F05-052 TOTAL Billable Costs l b $116.75 Amount Total Total of Fees (Time Charges) 2r'10 $1,454.75 Total of Costs (Expense Charges) 2�I' $116.75 Total new chargesof- Accounts n �/ $1,571.50 Accounts Receivables U' DateJID' Type Description 1/15/2004 CRED Credit ($1,000.00) 504 Receipt #394710. Check #1053 1/15/2004 INV Invoice $36.00 505 '7/8/2005 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:59 PM Pre-Bill Worksheet Page 5 Laffins.TPM 04-13:Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees (continued) Amount Total 1/15/2004 CRED Credit NOD/NOE Recording Fee ($36.00) 506 Receipt #394710. Check #1053 11/2/2004 PAY Payment ($740.15) 1194 Receipt #413140 Total Accounts Receivable ($1,740 15) Total New Balance ($168.65) Funds Account: Default Previous account balance $1,686.50 Employee Summary Employee Rate Hours Charges Slip Value Adjustment SB 58.87 12.11 $712.89- $712.89 0.00 CD 59.03 10.56 $623.39 $623.39 0.00 CAS 45.00 0.45 $20.25 $20.25 0.00 GLB 138.39 0.33 $45.67 $45.67 0.00 RT 34.12 1.54 $52.55 $52.55 0.00 \ In \ v Correspondence Lo Sheet Applicant: Ronald and Claudine Laffins, Trustees Project Number: TPM 04-13 APN: 006-230-047 Date. Name/Agency Correspondence/Comments,. ` Attachments ;r `Action '. Received i K:\Planning\Projects\Log Sheet.dot 1 ESMERALD.4 TRACT 06: tkz---.Fl_ & s� -10 A.P.006-230-046 A.P.006-230-045 S'37-18'40"E 120.0' ,e:.et W.' v :c:.G: ,BI._J :;V1•:J c :tlt.]]. fi'M1.�J�,':: :iYE: I 5 P uL F EXISTING BUILDING (BLUE HAVEN POOLS) z I 0 oF=r — is pyo :;„• . -17S I - L z(L ' -------- i .,fie c• o a------------- :.' EXISTING SEWER x I LATERALR ---- ----------c;— PARCEL 2 j' FUTURECONNECTION i 18,025.5 SF t•' N N I. EXISTING LEACH LINES_ —— 1 0 `EXISTING SDDI I / II-- \`AS"tl<d I PAYOL'Et1i—.` II EXISTING WATERLINE • I� EXISTING i I A.P.006-380-016 I "`E I STORMDRAIN—/_ /%i A.P.006-230-048 ] I537 8'40'E 5 —'7=at . 120.0' E L .3' 5' L IM L'.:•'t 7e.�. I I t. J I, 3 PARCEL 1 N Y1 _ 16,913.715F; EXISTING BUILDING Dam PAM 1yt EXISTING SEWER LATERAL — i (SUPERIOR AUTO) PALLS(11F,. ;ii -FOR'FUTURE CONNECTION I 1 n 79 e 9. nes<� ic. A 5.0 FOOT WIDE i G i i A 41,00 FOOT WIDE NON—EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT NON—EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT— FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES, PARCEL 1 PARKING, FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES �; i' INGRESS AND EGRESS AND STORM DRAINAGE FOR THE BENEFIT OF i :-';'j;,� FACILITIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 2 PARCEL 2 TO BE =' e.:sJ; i�• TO BE RESERVED IN DEEDS. RESERVED IN DEEDS. ! I 6 m.dE :7>.er j r--�s•cr:.(rr; -_.7t �; 41' P.U.E. EXISTING "BLUE HAVEN POOLS" SIGN • �,cl I �i' EXISTING 10.00 FOOT s'? __L_i<t_ WIDE DRAINAGE EAS EMENT v.uFn �ia EXISTING WATER METER U." �:PN 378'40'W 120.0' -:C!iiEn 8:7 S?n-Jf 'SaG--]c,p.-• - :111:3 g i .E .p;..,. Gi„ nt.±:----� ----a—ea.ve==..=.•eaee=ql Fs:L ewe.-cove==i,d:]t.E: nt�,. Ile r. PROJECT BENCH MARK CHISELED SQUARE IN TOP OF CURB ESPLANADE (PUBLIC) ELEVATION = 179.11 CITY OF CHICO DATUM. I v E�N';E -- - - - US HIGHWAY99 �---------- sC,�C OWNER AND SUBDIVIDER: F MR. RON LAFFINS � 3255 CANYON OAK TERRACE �o A.P. 006-230-046 A.P. 006-230-045 CHICO, CA 95928 SITE S 3718'40• E 120.0' ENGINEER: c 5..3:= 8 :';JOD `�AC� _ x i 73.6' 3 5' ,- ,ro;n x 179Ja 779.28 t7s'56 x 179, _ ROLLS, ANDERSON & ROLLS ESPLANADE 61 ° ATTN: KENNETH G. SKILLMAN III --- R.C.E. 45328, L.S. 7197 w — s' KUL 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE w CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 z a EXISTING BUILDING (BLUE HAVEN POOLS) tV Z ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: I - w 0 006-230-047 (2862 ESPLANADE, CHICO, CA.) = a wQ (n Of-1 0F_0 afAO -- of Ooa ZONING: ui f --- --"- EXISTING SEWER C2 LOCATION MAP . _ LATERAL FOR NO SCALE --"-- ---- --- PARCEL Z N FUTURE CONNECTION 1s,oz5.5 SF C GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING LEACH LINESC14 C t o K -_-- - EXISTING LAND USE: = EXISTING SDDI NOTES: ? EXISTING WATERLINE GENERAL COMMERCIAL ^ -a 'PHAL! rE.,Er"r„ 1. EXISTING TREES AND STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN ON THE TENTATIVE MAP r• EXISTING ' AND EXCEPT AS NOTED, NONE ARE PLANNED FOR REMOVAL AT THIS TIME. �7c.66 ' STORM_- - ;' ;,! SUBDIVISION AREA: A-P. 006-380-016 A.P. 006-230-048 2. THERE ARE NO EXISTING RAILROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR GRADE CROSSINGS 7t DRAIN 0.82 ACRES/34,939.2 SF ON )R ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY. � r. -.72 ! I I � � ! v r I !S37"18'40"E 120.0' _7=7 _ 3. THEE ARE NO WELLS OR ABANDONED WELLS ON THIS PROPERTY. UTILITY SERVICE: " 4. DEVELOPMENT OF PARCEL 2 REQUIRED INSTALLATION OF STORMWATER QUANTITY AND QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURES: 5' x 7.5' x 50' Of- A. SEWER - SEPTIC TANK STORM DRAIN TRENCH. B. STORM DRAINAGE - CITY OF CHICO 5. A SOILS REPORT WAIVER HAS BEEN REQUESTED. C. WATER - CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE PARCEL 1 '� D. GAS & ELECTRIC - P.G. & E. u IANDg r - - 16,913.7'SF 1, E. TELEPHONE - SBC �� F. CABLE T.V. - COMCAST 7, EXISTING BUILDING -- - EXISTING SEWER LATERAL ElQS11NG �. PARKIN r _j _' (SUPERIOR AUTO) FOR FUTURE CONNECTION w S NY. o.717 I i7y.vt x 176.9 4 Exp. 121311_�2 A 5.0 FOOT WIDE -- A 41.00 FOOT WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT �� �'� �I LEGEND NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT � �. `�-.� �_:� ��� �:-�, .%� ;� FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES, PARCEL 1 PARKING, � �'QF CAI��ci�'' FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES INGRESS AND EGRESS AND STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 2 z., FOR THE BENEFIT OF ' ; i %;; � - - EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION � PARCEL 2 TO BE �' < _ ! -, TO BE RESERVED IN DEEDS. RESERVED IN DEEDS. _ _ l EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE ._.7__ 41 P.U.E. – EXISTING BLUE HAVEN POOLS" SIGN EXISTING STORM DRAIN DROP INLET _ �` % 3 EXISTING 10.00 FOOT — x— EXISTING FENCE TENTATIVE PARCEL IAP 4 to H9 i ; , WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT o s a'r _ _— rDEXISTING STORM DRAIN 5'P.U.E. -0 " '` EXISTING WATER METER __. 7 , N 3718'40" W ;` 120.0' FOR r•, J T APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE _a F. cX ?:-. - -LTi AND $ yy 1 -�C c 11. F.6 RON LAFFINS 176,v 17Fs.J2 PROJECT BENCH MARK ---'— PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE CHISELED SQUARE IN TOP OF CURB — E — PROPOSED ELETRIC LINE A DIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 2 OF ESPLANADE (PUBLIC) ELEVATION G -TION = 179.11 CITY of CHICO TUM. - THE ESMERALDA TRACT, BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 23 _ PROPOSED GAS LINE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA v — PROPOSED WATER LINE C� o PROPOSED SANITARY CLEANOUT RAR ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT CIVIL ENGINEERS 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973-5811 NOVEMBER, 2003 03184 SHEET 1 OF 1 UPDATED 01 /10/05 PER PUBLIC WORKS' COMMENTS 01 /07/05 t OZ=.L um-rags YWOj11J'O�N� ZOOZ �838W3030 alaq Nay �� �aaUS IIn0aleas S? � * NOSZ:BCNV STG� LZ6S6 b ' �tN3 SNII / NOU dV8 une, Q 9£OZO Nd131S VO ® uosjgpuy p3 jagwnN 6utnneJa jagwnN Pa[ad AS A �d1l�Od0j a�a xoe o a + HOS CEWC ld Xe a�ep suolslnaa panaddV p V3 au�saa �14'01.,,i'(llll r)'MMNtVld _v.._...,,..»,:....,-.,....,11 141 t�'Q tl! LLS ll't7 _ SIN 1 A �l IC3 d �� ' r d A _41 22 R ;�° ' =�.e .ar��o�acil'�' NMO38 "WOUl.l. RM_-NO 'W iva 3objans 'o'tl ONLLSIX3 a3Ao 03IHO 10 J.1I0 L l'6L L = NOIl`dn3�3 01218tl3 ON13803NI38 1lViSNI aino JO d01 NI 3�jVl10s 4313SIHO ziltct }I�It1W H�N38 lJ3f'U23d 30V2JO OI WI21 V 310H ANIS Nlb'YV St+O ONLLSIX3 ----�Nib��,.8 � 3'IOHNtlW 3SIt/a ?JIbd32i Onld 30VNV IdS3 3zls 1VI SNI 3oIMN3S SVO 03SOdO8d -••-�� -•�— -- 311tlM301S 21313W 2131tlM 11VISNI «Z/L-L ONLLSIX3 ilnbn W*LL='AN1 830V3H i�xNIY438 O-LONLLSIX3 O'V ONLLSI'X3 83A0 ,S 1'lnbn l ld « 3DIA83S 012110313 03SOdO8d ...... � •�- —. AVl2i3A0 '0'tl .Z/L-L 1ltl1SNl SIN nza, W2J03N00 3 78 Od 3 V Od )IbM3Al CI ONLLS 3 NOLL��:�S ��IdJl.t. 31JS-NO 1334 s aQ,.l z1"9Ltd�1 OL'9LL� 711aM3QIS dNb 2J311f1O 821n0 OlVI1SIX3 9Lt�, ,8-8, N0LL03S 1V01dA1 MM301S 01 1N30vrov 'o'V ONIOline z9'ece 6z-9L{i 09 zcwl i� 33S olOLL03M VOldUONiAVd ONLLSIX3 30 3003 0NIN9 ONLLSIX3 21313N 2J31aM " �.� sosLtoe SV5 £9 X08 30d a oa 9 �� d '. ""' ONf1SiX3 ao.r/c Y � � e .� ��� 3NOHd313J. o� Lt, ao se tr9u llnan 213I3VY I'O ONIISIX3 313213N00 11VHdStl 03SOd02id I P �- - w .) d 3dld N0211 (� axtt , W02JO213ONn --'' D �'F n 8,11vm N3d0 .t�/£ aNnO.� 3 9d VC91 L=(3)'AN8,.8 5 y7 t 6 ,o� sL sLt ONLLSIX3 l3Nbd (301S 1SV3) 30VNVldS3 NI NIVW 213IVM '0'V«8 ONLLSIX3 99'511=(S)'nNl„OL 1 .9—,L SIN i ��i S83HIO JY8 81'611=WRJ aq tr a3 s9scL o0 99"scL 1x012110313 NOIS Ol 83MOd �o� zs sct NOLL��3S 3US-NO H'w'Q'S 'X3 JNIISIX3 10313 ONn02JO2J30Nn t . W01108 ONV d01 'SMIS Itl2131V1 0 VIA a o 0 0 0 213M3S A2IVIINVS 0350d021d SS i' 01218`dd x31113 3111X31-030 s°i$° ootarC3oso S83H10 A8 x rn b313w SxO cn AlISN30 '1321 S6 Atld 1 bH S Ln Ln ONIISIX3 3dld $ °� � • 0310n2l1SN00 38 Ol NOIS �+ L��iZ-9�•d•b 3NIl 301A2J3S 2J31VM 03SOd021d NItl210 W2J015 .8 aa” o1# 1 ) lLd o 0 0�0�0 0 0 o I Ol 031otldW00 30V2JO ens a o s 3131dW00 kVI83A0 SLE i hNt 03IV80A13d 3dOH ; / (3abNb1dS3 Z92-Z) �o� jo so�oso (IVOld,U) O21b08 830V3H 031V381 •9 X .Z lltliSNI �/ ONIAVd 21313V 30V80 Ol (Olnd Zi012J3dnS) 3SV8 7JO9V Z 'lO .8 z 0 0 0 0 0 0 IN18 V 31VW 3SIV21 (03211n032i MIS AdRi3A) (1N31VAIn03 03A021ddV 80) _ m 11 ON1031n8 ONIISIX3 N1tl2J0 V321V ISI I I-==1 11• 301AN3S 83iVM NOLLobdW03 3ALLVl32J _ `" 8 U r 8 �LS6 Ol 0310VdW00 .9t X .91 SiN000 03SOdQ2id ® «j'/£ 'Z SS'dlo '8'b Cp��Oc %£"b'L=S-NIVW 4 i '. 77 o O'V M3N M 1I1tlM3015 3dld Nla210 W21015 aNl1SIX3 --- OS.t�Z — °a 2J3M35 Ol NOLL03NN00 Xti x 3132J.7N00 ONl1SIX3 (1V.0ldA1) c,,,•t 1, .; 38nind 2JOd Ss o.* § NVld 335 '3'tl HOIVN Ol 3003 ON180 S2J3dWn8 313210NO3 z 1 `S\ 1 65Z 11�! r 30V1d321 3AOW321 3dCH as VY \ i• { 3dld NIV80 ftOIS 03SOdONd I S312JVA 3d0IS lV3S.O03 /M y` f$ s 'ONOO 11VHdSV .8. 3dA1 .Z 30VNIV80 3ou8nS 03SOdONd � 31V32i8 3Cb21O SIN 30vi8nS 03SOdO8d - -- - - - -- -- - - NMO-M WO� �-� 00'911='ANI `� 0'0 S: xr i w f 3ZIS AJ183A I }, 301A83S SVO 3IVNIXIO&MV NOLLxo01 3Nf1 AI213d02ldl 01313 HOV31 ONLLSIX3 31OHNW4 V4801S ONLLSIX3 SIIVIS ONI>18Vd M&S-'32i t r N3 3A 1 Hc} I_'�,, NOLLVA3l3 ONV „e-8, NOLL03S 33S r k , �'13'L7S £ZL8 n' r, s��� 3ZIS Ad1213A 03SOd02Jd ir'6Ll = '1lVHdStl ONLLSIX3 83A0 r a' � � 30V2iO HSINI3 M3N 33IA213S 83MOd ONU1tld NO 3SOd021 .' ONUtbd OV «Z/l-L 11tl1SNl 1 a a 3132!0 O 0 d dWt1S NIStlB 'S30bd21nS ONISIIVM iN30Vf OV 3A08V .9£ 30 WnWINIW �' Ol 213A00 3SIV2! . HOIVO Ol NIN ,Z V 38 llVHS 3003 WO.UO8 ONW Q31Nnov4 Iivm '3-n'd ,�9 `1 T r ' e6�4• £6'9LL-011 dol NOLL03S 1V01d,11 38 IIVHS SNOIS AlnI81SS3ooV �0 10>BWAS 3HI MO138 F LL'6LL=wla '3'n'd ,S ,b-b, 031NnoW 38 IIVHS .318VSS300V NVA. ONLLVIS NOIS NIVW] YMOIS 33S 'N008 3SV8 CNV ONIAVd Y NNYi 311d3S 'X3 3132J3N00 1lVHdStl 03SOd021d lbN0LL100tl NV ONn02iOHOVB 3ni8 N21V0 b NO 3LIHM Nt d0x „S '1S{X3 Cl 1NVdno30 HIM 211v'H3 133HM V d0 M31A 311d08d V JO FY � { 03HS ISISNOO IIVHS NOIS kin181SS300V HONI 'OS OL 3Hl L9'6CI 8v-noo 31383N00 'lSIX3 0 3NI1 ONI011nB 03SOd02Jd °r�6 °rte �°� rib°�'sa°s` °aa° sa° °��ds3°sab°s•�°t °:' , �•' ao�oso�oo�°,o�o�oo�o�o�o ojAo �o�a�o�a�o�a�osa�osa�o a • 3�R '; v ONLLSIX3�W32i 3 Nae �� oo �� ,8 ,6 ONrAWd '30V80 Ol 83AOO ONV 3WV84 00 �e 3NI1 30N3� ONLLSIX3 ti ,___ S i°a3°s, t°i3 °:3°JL°ib°t°:3°30 oto° iboto�3 �°�2►°iaa3°i°d�oi°�3oso `� oN3 Nai •: .:o$;;°o`°o"O�a"°'°o'°"o°I"°"o°�"'°�o°i'o o"o "oo�o�oQ►°".a°i►o°'o°.o",q.o"b o 310H NVW 11VISNI 0NV 30V89 Ol 3N11 �J3M3S ONIISIX3 a • • •• •a•• •0.°0.0°• 0.•Oo0 0.•Oo °•0 O••0ea°•OoO.•0 0.•0 0..0.0.:. ar O fez!, �. Nam •ip •b r�D �O • •ap oo •r o0 ••ip Z�p =rp • o' 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 oa as oo a ONIN3d0 1iNVi 0LLd3S 3S8V2J o�3 as o3 z{cole3 # a3 a3Ns 3NIl AI213d021d - - ,v 1 ss su 59'8Li 56'6 0 } $ z xy 1 K�fGi ; 7fL V .a a.ad"ouwH z 6Y6L1 *'6LL ' a y " '� r 1` ,t T`jtl t 1y: ?Y ? LY~F i �'S .� 313210N00 .'. oso oso 0 0 0 0 0 MOM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ON11121Vd 133&S-3d0 01 30NV&N3 3H1 w + � r�+ ab s3 s tl� ao a x ,t IV 30V1d SnonoldSNOo tl 1V 031SOd ti ' scL acsu 1SIX3 • n co rs ' x ` t , t ; , 'k' bi.. HSV21l 2131N3O 38 IIVHS NOIS AVMV MOI 3A08V 3H1 r '1 F i •; NVV t dWVlO 1"9£ = Y r , r' t 4. MOB N_ 1331S SS3"iNIV1S 1V S3d 2ilS 09'9L L='ANI .8 T.1 x t dtl3 3dld 4 ::. z.,., <, /M HS3W 'A1tlO .Z/L _ h 0£'61 t 31V2iO dWtllo a '~ ONINOHd3l31 A8 210 H1d30 3dAl $0'LLL=:o�I ! 1C IS lIV1SNl F iy t.� A�, P , t 1 , r T !l� t 1. t *`: i✓'n Y ,i i U 5 i R 3ZIS ISIX3 A302J3A r ur w t 1r Ks ^5''� t r �>� it y '4'q rr e 1C7rf 9� yN y i r rr 101 ONnOdWI 3ollOd oSW NIV80 NNUS d3V .8 r, � I331S SS3lNItl1S t� /M HUN 'AIVO «Z/L 'OZ 1V 03WIV1338 38 AVW x '1SIX3 01 I03NN0o S3131H3A 03M01 HON381 '.�'l Si+ 11VISNI v 3-IVDS O N x '3SN3dX3 SN3NMO 1V o3 `}•.. '• 3 F L�'�^^irl°.'1'f'++4�.�. }: 'SRT NIV2J0 W2JOlS�`L �i t'� os3o3 LSSLt c' �- 'A'l 05 11VISNI AVMV 03Mo1 38 IINA = u s - ,x f; f .� t� ,r , , Y ,� ddW NOIldOO� V-b NOLL03S 33S �� 4 j N SNOSN3d 0318VSI0 2103 v v a �. y�9i 03nSS1 S31Vld 3SN3311 80 T-'13 'IDS SZ68 •30VWS IS ' - - - - - - SO21VOVld ONIHSmONLLS10 ONIAVldS10 ION S30VdS 031OVdW00 83AO '3'V .Z OiNV Z '13 '8'V 8 IIVISNI £ • tY (310N 33S) . f OZ'SLL='ANI 8 3181SS33oV 03LVNOIS30 NI 03ANVd �Y t nld NOIS A111181SS300b t �, ` Oi�'6L L=3IV21O HONI 'OS OL 53131H3A 03ZRlOH1nVNn s` ' u z°`< 2r, s x a 3NI1 A1213d021d r SSIS y, �� w 100S 11V1SNI ONldl8IS 0NV SN3dnn8 ONIh21Vd d `' d r '• i KJ t , 1IV130 33S-138V08 830V3H ONVONVIS 11VISNI 6'611 z - `7313 LO'8L1='ANI 'sn t f Q0 m D3 y 33S £z sct #'� S 03ddVO1ONVH s •i n f.T1.tV"� .�.5.. ooO._i I. 59 rt Opti o � Qa . _77777 VHS b�_._13-1 c7.L ►t . _ 9 o"i 1"d�la...al�[`0'.LL'1 11X11._ _ �3 0 9z•su �Og 0 � 108 tv 2131VM N0110n2LLSN00 01 2J0121d y9 tl SAVO £ ISV31 IV bbbZ-*Z9-008 1V ,12J31V 301A83S ONn02JO2130Nn IWO IIVHS 801OVaN00 012110313 3HI 'NOIlonaSN00 01 8018d S3LLIILtLn MV 30 H1d30 ONV NOLLVOO1 '30N31SIX3 3H1 U183A Ot'8L1='ANI 11VHS NOI3Vallo3 3H1 '3131dW00 38 LOIN AVY4 (INV 31VWIXO8ddV 38V SNVld 353HI NO NMOHS : ,� nNi_ 1n0-Ntl313 XNVI 011d3S SVO 38 ION AVW w AVW ivHi smnun ONLLSIX3 ANY 30 SWAM CNV SNOLLV301 'SNVId 3S3HI NO 9.; " ; SS 1ltlISNI N07V9 OOZL NMOHS ION UV H01HM ins 032131Nnow 38 kVW HOIHM S103r80 0318n8 N3H10 210 S3LL1110V� • 11V1SNl o_ ONn02JOM30Nn my 30 NOLLVO01 3H1 21103 3181SNOdS3N 38 1lVHS 8010V211NOO 3Hl 'S311nan 03 ,0£ 3prt 0NnouoN30Nn 11V 30 NOLLV301 3H1 011 SV S1o12LLS10 kinun 210/ONV S31NVdW00 Ainun 1lV o3 4� Lc�{ 9Z'6LI St6L3 93 03 o N 0 Li'sGt rc sct ONLLOVINOO NOJ 3181SNOdS38 38 IIVHS 8 013V81N00 3HI 'NOLLon2JISN03 d0 "V15 01 8018d Z 99'611 OL'08L=_U '>180M 10 IMMON3WN03 OI 8018d C0 Maim 03SOdO8d 3did O1liHOV31 ,5 NOISS3SSOd NI SNVld MOM 3AVH 11VHS 2J010V&NO0 3HL 'NOLLon&swo Ol 8018d 03211nO38 031V80Jd3d 0j, •3 '1 OZL 30N3d SI S3ALLV1N3S3Nd38 03ZR10H1nV 2i13Hi do SX210M onend 30 2101032110 3H1 SO 1VA08ddV S C13UH0V31 11VISNI ANi1 NIaHO 'Z66L .klnf 031V0 SNOILVOIJ103dS 08YONV1S NOLLVI8OdSNV2l1 30 1N3rtL8Vd3C VIN80311VO 30 ONIISIX3 311S 31VIS 3H1 30 SNOU80d 31evonddv CNV 'SNOLLV0I3103dS (INV SONVONVIS IN3W3AO8dM UNnoD o3 011 Jill 3Hl HIM 33NV02J000V NI 3N00 38 IIVHS AVM 30 1HOIN o118nd 3H1 NIFLLVA MOM 11V 'L ��� 03 e5 93 BL'9Ll — _ OL 6LL l0'0$l �MOMALSNOOZG'6L{ i9'6LL ,Q {9'613 O SZ'6Lt —a•- J3/N3e D3/N3e Nae `036Kb 99'tot 9£'1191 o3�H 49"L$t o9t .0e \ s9 Let o3/N�e �� a rra t9l ` Q ,00'0T.L �dY/N3e 'dNf103 83N800 Al�GdO2ld Sao tion �► AlNO 3H1 SI 83N800 MMHAON 3H1 lb ��e�s allowlx „SL L�L`t St1 3dld N081 N3dO j,/C `d '1k1N0 31VV4lXO8ddV 0NUSIX3 A.Viame" MW (INV 1d-Id S,60SS3SS`d (INV S3NIl 30N34 66 NO C13Sb8 321d NMOHS SV S3N1I Jll?�3d0?�d u fiN 1` I ) d n�,.Ff-:9 310N it �S:M�RA.Lc�A TRACT II US HIGHWAY 99 sC)q� OWNER AND SUBDIVIDER: , F MR. RON LAFFINS ���� � 3o A.P. 006-230-046 A.P. 006-230-045 3255 CANYON OAK TERRACECHICO, CA 95928 SITE S 3718'40" E 120.0' at.efi ,a;.a7 1e.1.6= 18i.61 ,d,.8� 15' ALMOND 16,.3E WOOD 7;.![. 179.8, ENGINEER: 17s.6t ,79.70 x 179.79 '79.29 179.36 x 179.72 ROLLS, ANDERSON & ROLLS at GO ATTN: KENNETH G. SKILLMAN III ESPLANADE i R.C.E. 45328, L.S. 7197 w s P.u.E 3 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE z 74. x to R, CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 a i 179.34 ,79.4i ,79.15 x 179.26 v 17q 37 0 EXISTING BUILDING (� (BLUE HAVEN POOLS) { o ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER.: N W w< 179.2 006-230-047 (2862 ESPLANADE, CHICO, CA.) � i f o li o 79.34 - - ouzo T ZONING: � _ _ xns.� I ��9.os OZd �Q,. z : --------I LOCATION MAP I ------- �• EXISTING SEWER C2 NO SCALE i . LATERAL FOR ------c PARCEL 2 /% FUTURE CONNECTION GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: I 18,025.5 SF N I cm EXISTING LEACH LINES 'Y\\\ N C- - - - - - - oar rk--Sr --SI! --SD c N x °0 75.58/ 9.61x79.57 � EXISTING SDDI J, EXISTING LAND USE: NOTES: ` '--ASPHALT MUMENTI ,� i EXISTING WATERLINE GENERAL COMMERCIAL -113 1. EXISTING TREES AND STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN ON THE TENTATIVE MAP 1�4 55x ( I j EXISTING I i AND EXCEPT AS NOTED, NONE ARE PLANNED FOR REMOVAL AT THIS TIME. 66 I STORM-..li; SUBDIVISION AREA: A.P. 006-380-016 I I ! I DRAIN A.P. 006-230-048 2. THERE ARE NO EXISTING RAILROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR GRADE CROSSINGS 173'2 179.72 c , ° " ` 0.82 ACRES/34,939.2 SF ON OR ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY. LL a cx,,;T. S3T 8'40"E n9.7a >s.s7 f ,79.7 1 I C '79.68 r r," ,.: 179.g�,, 120.0'- �5��E�>��c •�� P���_��-}���� 3. THERE ARE NO WELLS OR ABANDONED WELLS ON THIS PROPERTY. n N 85 179.93 179.85�-` E .ra UTILITY SERVICE: 4. DEVELOPMENT OF PARCEL 2 REQUIRED INSTALLATION OF STORMWATER 5' � TOP uo=176 A. SEWER - SEPTIC TANK QUANTITY AND QUALITY MITIGA11ON MEASURES: 5' x 7.5' x 50' OF> STORM DRAIN TRENCH. f B. STORM DRAINAGE - CITY OF CHICO 5. A SOILS REPORT WAIVER HAS BEEN REQUESTED. SPHALT PAVut.If} i ,� 3 C. WATER - CALIFORNIA WAITER SERVICE , D. GAS & ELECTRIC - P.G. & E. cn PARCEL U 16,913.7RSFj E. TELEPHONE - SBC z _w_ O SAND s&, ;,; ` F. CABLE T.V. - COMCAST A�� EXISTING BUILDING - <'>? EXISTING SEWER LATERAL - � EXISTING PARIgN& t (SUPERIOR AUTO) STALLS(�•Y �! FOR FUTURE CONNECTION CO s T / ea: �5Y ,79.x3 x,78.94 13 179.27 . u x; f _ uj LS No.7197 c A 5.0 FOOT WIDE f A 41.00 FOOT WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT JAN 13 2005 * Exp.12/31/ NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT ASPHALT PA rRaE,T FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES, PARCEL 1 PARKING, LEGEND D O NT + INGRESS AND EGRESS AND STORM DRAINAGESE, q� Q' FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES FACILITIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 2 EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION � QFcav�° FOR THE BENEFIT OF � 7/7 ' N ;; � x'74 37 PARCEL 2 TO BE e,; ,n /! i I TO BE RESERVED IN DEEDS. 4 /!2 RESERVED IN DEEDS. Gr.ATE-,7e.�� s"WH e ✓ EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE i- =�a•,Nv.�w;-,�s.�� � 41 P.U.E. ' R �3 EXISTING "BLUE HAVEN POOLS" SIGN EXISTING STORM DRAIN DROP INLET 3 EXISTING 10.00 FOOT -X- EXISTING FENCE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP "4.92 79.x9 R;M_17G18 I WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT �r---------------- 179.88 '?9.", ; 179.59 'S"1k�1.(S=1;5.65 'D1 i . s'RUE PxlsaNc LANDSCAPE EXISTING 5°iN1��(t�-175. 4 � EXISTING WATER METER �SD - EXISTING STORM DRAIN FOR 175.72 ) LANBSCAPE ,79.38 N 3718'40" W 120.0' 79_= 178'G1 W----------------------'- ------ 17-9.19 :; 7471 APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE 178.83 Ex'STING CURD GUTTER AND S;DrW'A!K Q. t79.0s EXiSTIt�'G DP.IV`�W'A.Y�..T�'t79.c9 178.3;x__ -== 3==--===== ,7F.s ROIL LAFFINS i78AE ------------------- ,7E.7i178.72 PROJECT BENCH DARK PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE CHISELED SQUARE IN TOP OF CURB - E - PROPOSED ELETRIC LINE A DIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 2 OF ESPLANADE (PUBLIC) ELEVATION - G -= 179.11 CITY of CHICO THE ESMERALDA TRACT, BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 23 4 - - - _ PROPOSED GAS LINE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - v - PROPOSED WATER LINE o PROPOSED SANITARY CLEANOUT RAR ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS RLI.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT CIVIL ENGINEERS 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973-5811 NOVEMBER, 2003 03184 SHEET 1 OF 1 UPDATED 01 /10/05 PER PUBLIC WORKS' COMMENTS 01 /07/05 i 1 • i .T