Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
VAR 03-01_PLANNING
ZI SEPARATORSHEET A>N OL-( 7 - x'-10 - 0 09 -01 PROJECT NUMBER VAR 03 PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE#: VAR 03-01 PROJECT TYPE: Variance APPLICANT: Stephen J. Schuster ADDRESS: 4011 Spyglass Road, Chico, CA 95973 OWNER: Mark Burington ADDRESS: 4011 Spvglass Road,Chico,CA 95973 REPRESENTATIVE: Schuster Homes ADDRESS: 4011 Spyglass Road, Chico,CA 95973 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan allows a maximum building coverage of 15%of the lot area PROPERTY ZONED: SR-1 (Suburban Residential, 1-acre parcels), (as modified by the North Chico Specific Plan) LOCATED: north side of Lindbergh Circle approximately 1,100 feet north of Guntren Road,Chico area AP#: 047-740-009 TOWN/AREA: Chico GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: AR(Agricultural-Residential) 1. Application accepted: 11/15/02 Amount: $ 1,114.00 Receipt#: 20857 2. Comments sent to: Environmental Health,California Department of Forestry,Development Services Director,Public Works Director, Building Manager 3. Comments received from: 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 6. Assigned To: Stephen Betts 7. Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No: categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Subject to Fish&Game: Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. -CEQA# 15061.(bx3) Other 8. Staff Report: Project Video: 9. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: 10. Publication Notice Written: Display Ad Prepared: 11. Notices Mailed: Number of Notices: 12. Newspaper Publication Date: A O C P G . B 13. Planning Commission Hearing(s): Action taken: ` Special Conditions: Commission Resolution No. 14. Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: 15. Type Use Permit/Send for signature: I 16. N.O.E./N.O.D./APPENDIX G: Fish&Game Fees Paid: Yes No I 17. Send validated Use Permit: 18. Assessor's Memo: 19. Copy of Use Permit/Variance to Planning Technician: i r Stephen J. Schuster, (Item determined to be categorically exempt from environmental review), Variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan allows a maximum building coverage of 15% of the lot area. The property is zoned SR-1 (Suburban Residential — 1 acre parcels) and is located on the north side of Lindbergh Circle, approximately 1,100 feet north of Guntren Road, Chico area. APN 047- 740-009 (SB) (VAR 03-01) Mr. Betts informed the Commission that Mr. Schuster would like a decision made today. Commissioner Evans said he was absent at the January 9,2003,meeting and asked if the figure for 15% coverage is the lowest coverage area in the NCSP and is it correct that staff is not sure where the figure came from? Mr. Betts said the concern was drainage and aesthetics. He said in the drainage section of the EIR and in the Specific Plan itself, there is no mention of runoff from individual lots. He noted that the Specific Plan references structures and that staff did not include impervious surfaces. Mr. Wannenmacher said in answer to Commissioner Evans question,that on the chart attached to the report, the lowest percentage coverage is 10% in the SR-3. Commissioner Evans said the house and garage are structures that go into the 15% coverage, but pools, tennis courts, etc. don't. Mr. Betts said he believes a covered walkway is considered a structure. Chairman Lambert said she can not make the findings to change the requirement with a Variance. Commissioner Evans agreed that they could not make the findings for special circumstances. Commissioner Marin said 15% coverage is too low a number to impose on the lot and where the neighbors have no objections he was inclined to approve the variance. The hearing was opened to the public. -No one was present to speak on this item. The hearing was closed. Chairman Lambert said the problem is in this case the 15%was specifically applied to this area in a Specific Plan. Commissioner Leland said the County has the rule and this application does not meet the rule and he would vote against approval. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■JANUARY 9, 2003 ■ PAGE 15 ■ M Chairman Lambert noted that the owner can reduce the size of the dwelling, or he can build his home and come back with a proposal to amend the Specific Plan and later build the garage if the restriction is changed. Mr. Wannenmacher read the procedure out of the County Code to amend the Specific Plan. Commissioner Evans did not think the Commission had the authority to change the requirement as set forth in the Specific Plan. It was moved by Commissioner Leland, seconded by Commissioner Evans, and carried to deny the Variance request by Stephen Schuster because it does not comply with the density criteria and can not meet the condition of granting a Variance by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Nelson, Leland, Evans, and Chairman Lambert NOES: Commissioner Marin ABSENT: No one ABSTAINED: No one j i ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ JANUARY 9,2003 ■ PAGE 16 ■ ti � • Stephen J. Schuster, (Item determined to be categorically exempt from environmental review), Variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan allows a maximum building coverage of 15% of the lot area. The property is zoned SR-1 (Suburban Residential — 1 acre parcels) and is located on the north side of Lindbergh Circle, approximately 1,100 feet north of Guntren Road, Chico area. APN 047- 740-009 (SB) (VAR 03-01) Mr.Betts gave a brief summary of the project. He said it was determined that the pool and barbeque is not considered as part of the coverage area. Mr. Betts did a power point presentation. He corrected the report stating the coverage area would be 2 1.1% instead of the 15% coverage area that is allowed. He said the North Chico Specific Plan(NCSP)has a 15%lot coverage requirement for aesthetics . He said this small increase will not cause an aesthetic problem. Vice Chairman Lambert said the NCSP sets out specific requirements and she did not think there should be any variances allowed. Commissioner Leland said.he could not make the finding that this property was being denied what other property was allowed. He did not see any way to approve a variance. He discussed the possibility of changing the zoning to eliminate the restriction. Vice Chairman Lambert said she would rather amend the NCSP than to grant a variance. Mr. Betts submitted a letter from the neighbors asking that this be approved. The hearing was opened to the public. Bill Brower said that no one can tell him where the 15% figure came from when the NCSP was adopted. He noted that everyone in the neighborhood signed a petition in favor of the variance. He discussed the Specific Plan and the means to make changes with regard to the Specific Plan. Commissioner Leland asked where are the findings needed to grant a variance. He said findings can not be made because of size,shape,or topography of the property and nothing deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity. Mr. Brower said that changing the General Plan would not solve Mr. Schuster's problem because of the time it would take to process a General Plan amendment. He said the standard is questionable as to how it was created. Commissioner Leland said the Commission might have discretion to determine the coverage ratio and what that consists of, i.e.,paving,buildings, structures,or just livable space. He said since this is probably an aesthetic issue the Commission is looking at buildings including garages,balconies, patios, etc. Commissioner Marin asked staff what is the purpose of a variance. Mr. Betts said a variance is granted to allow a different standard than what is required. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ JANUARY 9,2003 ■ PAGE 10 ■ • Mr. Wannenmacher pointed out that no special circumstances have been identified in order to approve this variance. Commissioner Marin felt the variance could be approved. He said a variance is to help people do what they want to do and where everyone is in agreement, staff, the applicant, the neighbors, he would agree with granting this variance. Vice Chairman Lambert explained the history of the NCSP. She said a lot of thought and hard work went into creating this Plan. She said the SR-1 zone is different within the NCSP and it was hard fought to be established. She said she has difficulty in making findings on a variance today. Mr. Wannenmacher explained what it would take to amend the Specific Plan. Commissioner Marin suggested that this hearing be continued so they can have a full Commission present. Mr. Brower asked Counsel if he had pre-read the recommendation. He suggested that maybe the Director could use her discretion to approve this variance. Commissioner Leland said that staff does not have the discretion to approve this, only the commission. Mr. Brower said that the Director has discretion every day to interpret the standards. Yvonne Christopher,Development Services Director,said she does not have the discretion to act on any item under the Zoning Code, and that all items go to the Commission for public hearings. Commissioner Leland asked Ms. Christopher what would have to be done to a Specific Plan to change the standards. Ms. Christopher said this might seem like a simple change, but the County is in the middle of a County General Plan update and this change could take a long time. She said staff would need to look at the whole NCSP if the Plan is opened up for any kind of discussion. Mr. Brower asked about entering into a Development Agreement to change this requirement in the . Specific Plan. Mr. Alpert, County Counsel, said he was skeptical of entering into a Development Agreement. Mr. Brower said-it might be better to have the Commission deny this item so it can be appealed to the Board. Ms. Christopher pointed out that if the Commission can not make the findings,the Board would not be able to make the findings either. Mr. Brower asked that this hearing be continued to have Mr. Schuster present. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■JANUARY 9,2003 ■ PAGE 1 I ■ • i Mr. Burington, land owner, discussed moving to the area and how he purchased the property. He said he is trying to build a nice home in a nice area. He said he would not want to wait another year to build his house. Ms. Christopher said the applicant should look at a way to reduce the ground to meet the 15%land coverage standard and wait urrtil later to put in other buildings if the Specific Plan standards change. i It was moved by Commissioner Leland,seconded by Commissioner Marin,and unanimously carried to continue this hearing open to February 13, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. i i I ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■MINUTES ■JANUARY 9,2003 ■PAGE 12 ■ P1 0 6/24/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:53 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 1 Selection Criteria Applicant (hand sel Include: VAR 03-01 Nickname VAR 03-01 1 Schuster Full Name Stephen Schuster Address Schuster Homes 4011 Spyglass Rd. Chico CA 95973 Phone 1 (530) 894-0894 Phone 2 Phone 3 Phone 4 In Ref To Fees Arrg. By billing value on each slip Expense Arrg. By billing value on each slip Tax Profile Exempt Last bill 5/7/2003 Last charge 4/30/2003 Last payment 6/23/2003 Amount $44.40 Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 11/11/2002 Roni Thornton 34.00 1.50 51.00 Billable 41587 C Clerical APPLICATION SET-UP 11/11/2002 Larry P. 59.00 1.25 73.75 Billable 41595 P Processing 11/19/2002 Steve B. 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 41676 P Processing 12/9/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.00 59.00 Billable 41696 P Processing 12/11/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 Billable 41697 P Processing 12/13/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 Billable 41698 P Processing . • • 6/24/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:53 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 2 VAR 03-01:Stephen Schuster(continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total . ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 12/23/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable 41773 C Clerical PUBLISHING 12/30/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 Billable 41815 P Processing 12/31/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.75 103.25 Billable 41816 P Processing 1/2/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable 41786 C Clerical 1/2/2003 Dan B. 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 41839 P Processing 1/8/2003 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 Billable 41923 P Processing POWER POINT PRESENTATION 1/9/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable - 41956 C Clerical MEETING/LETTER 1/9/2003 Steve B. 59.00 0.75 44.25 Billable 41963 P Processing PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 1/14/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable 42082 C Clerical MEETING/LETTER/MINUTES 1/15/2003 Roni Thornton 34.00 0.17 5.78 Do Not Bill 42100 C 0.17 5.78 Clerical PROOF READ MINUTES • • 6/24/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:53 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 3 VAR 03-01:Stephen Schuster(continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 2/5/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.15 6.75 Billable 42282 Clerical/Input Packets 2/12/2003 Steve B. 59.00 0.10 5.90 Billable 42341 Phone/Counter Phone call 2/13/2003 Steve B. 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable 42352 Hearings Public hearing 2/14/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.43 19.50 Billable 42374 Clerical/Min Minutes related to applications 4/10/2003 Cheryl S. 45.00 0.33 15.00 Billable 42674 Administrative Billing/administrative tasks not related to actual processing of application 4/25/2003 Lynn.R. 45.00 0.58 26.25 Do Not Bill 43040 Clerical/Min 0.58 26.25 Minutes related to applications 4/30/2003 Dan B. 59.00 1.00 59.00 Do Not Bill 43114 Reports 1.00. 59.00 Agenda Report TOTAL Billable Fees 18.51 $986.15 Do Not Bill 1.75 $91.03 Date Employee Price Quantity Amount Total ID Expense Markup % 1/22/2003 Lynn R. 44.40 1.000 44.40 Billable 43108 Publishing Publishing in newspaper-Chico enterprise TOTAL Billable Costs $44.40 V 6/24/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:53 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 4 VAR 03-01:Stephen Schuster(continued) Calculation of Fees and Costs Amount Total Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable time slips $986.15 Total of Fees (Time Charges) $986.15 Costs Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable expense slips $44.40 Total of Costs (Expense Charges) $44.40 Total new charges $1,030.55 Accounts Receivables DatejID Type Description 11/15/2002 FRED Deposit - Receipt #20857 ($700.00) 1983 5/7/2003 INV Invoice-NOD/NOE Filing Fee $36.00 2322 5/7/2003 PAY Payment-NOD/NOE Filing Fee, Receipt 20867. Check No. 5252 ($36.00) 2323 5/8/2003 PAY Payment ($286.15) 2372 Receipt #21148. Check No. 5900 6/23/2003 PAY Payment ($44.40) 2464 Receipt #21239. Check #6042. Check No. 6042 Total Accounts Receivable ($1,030.55) New Balance Current $1,030.55 Unapplied ($1,030.55) Total New Balance $0.00 COUNTY OF BUTTE AUD'ITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROVILLE, CA ATR NO 64754 RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BACs#328 DATE 612312003 FUND FUND DEFT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE: CODE . CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: 6-23 RECEIPTS: 21235-21239 P1.Ak—NTNG APDL FEES' GENL 0010 44=1 421109W 101001 1,627.40+ Project Number Amount of Fee #040-020-075 Hays&Assoc REZ 03-04 $417 #040-020-075 Hays&Assoc REZ 03-05 $605 �r #047-74 MOO Schuster Homess VAR03-09 $44-.40 - LAND DEVELOPMENT GENL ocio 44 4 4+819700 1wom 808.00 Project Number Amount of Fee #1411-020-075 Hats&Assoc REZ 03-04 $150 #040-020-075 Hays&.Assoc REZ nQ5 $050 ENVIRONMENTAL HLTH GENL 0010 54OW3 4614901 1("001 287.00 Project Number Amount of Fee #040-020-075 Hays&Assoc REZ 03-Q4 $287 FIRE PLNG ADPL FEE FIRE PROTECT 0100 4617240 101001 258.00 Project Number Amount of Fee #040-020-075 Hays&Assoc REZ 03-04 $43 #040-020-075 Hays&Assoc REZ 03-05 $215 NOD6NOE CLERK'S FILING FE GENL 0010 470001 4612318 101001 108.00 (M) Project Number Amount of Fee #€111-68 -Qi8 R Hill GOR Q3-Q5 $38 #040-020-075 Hays&Assoc REZ 03.04 $38 X40-020-075 Hays&Ass©c REZ 03-055 $38 DOCUME:NTBCOPV SALES GENL ODIC 440MI 4711910 101001 17.59 TOTAL 39097.99 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TREASURER BY: IK . ^ By: shite--tFeasurer pihic--auditor canary--depositor golden r¢d=file i I Arp ZD r` •� v b ( n ' nh hh C����T-075e/.y •xs.� .so�N •7rssro� 5�v H Ie .�j%'' e-sp c%e%1 hQ '£'O�r72/ %J hl �.7p •?o.s-Str : s�rN •�oss� �s.�vN 9£ £h GE£' L1b Ccl E'ghll Lff1� ��/°��� -�.-'''1'� ;,•.. q�O� Soe/ � 1` :-moi/� !o„•i'J 7�iN �vrb?1 7F � ;'--. .- ,5o,tV Z L0<� j Z zO MOtlI I1811d ..AI808tl 1NVpI1ddV tl8N10 Had Old 8tl1d M74314 GBWV ONPNVId pOdYl HHtlOM O8AI80Htl 'ON 8110 OONIdON ANa OflB(Id O 11101 1dI8p8tl • � 1 0-1% 4/z LIC- �`-ENW PUBLIC f I , , WORKS SALES HEALTH FIR -/NOD PUB E F/G FEE RECEIPT TOTAL LAF� PLANNING NOE DATE- NO. RECEIVED. NN OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM r RECEIPT 21239 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING ISSUED BY j !t ,r > ^r <s !`.. .,t' t,a - { I.�a •A r� ,r.. y3• t n(- 'i r� T 'e r' - ^t,i+• .-- . .,. �.,/.'� " i� )µ �) f1:� t � .y. 1k �� `x'y,j,'t!• { + f fJ ",,, irwf � »o ,..s.. r. t • Jt :• ac"� .t '•; :t '.,{<. 1 l tw. }} J ;r•{ 'i I t A l „ i -s R .a�� r, a. _^ 'i r + s ., •. �', • - � .!, t \. •; "L e)!_ 1'"^x^.'.'� ,<�'�'_ > 'bK'�.� l • - 17.''�. -sa�afr'SJir..'l JF.J lAW s '� f'.K:.."' S.. ";,•./:: ..=C ',r '�'G3 'h.tk'r. ^• 1 'a,':k '�,� t_ '' +�g `�a1, T1s':,3 - ..�3 > >• ';;i S v, 'k;.',r -,s'zy%V'BUTTECOMMUNITY BANK:' } :4•: •yy. 2041 FOREST AVENUE 3.�.x�{"•+. - . .... - \ �`<k :,k i`b*,•. r`°sy,Y;n{' .-i' ,,. '.>>,a.ay'. s'�+'y' ,�+:rY}a ,{, a',, -�, - CO;CA 95928 ,s c..< tri. s mak: 60742?, 3 8 r y 'w r .., 'kms$• .•� cj'.a �A { as`/,>;i�`x>- _3.y.�'"`,.,,,x_,j o_;;�' .�_",a F` x.'+'1 :� f ~'>�k�� --3? .^e ;C�,r'-�x� ' r" .h �'-•, � ,.>�}' 1•rt,'�",,<=�."' "`� £ �',i,R..';- h y + .�4 CHUSTERHOMES INC: C Sa.SsY j`so-a.zazjiz�i -M� :.t f� j w r t EXr + s: 4 ' *N k� Qt$,S�s =S TEPHEN:J'SCHUSTER , z �� 4011"SPYGLASS'RD °SPH:5308940894' 6/17/2003 $ - Y - G «i?� i -�;x�a."'f�^`x�,�`.�<r;�s°y -v , ��'Y+u �3.} ,l. c c j.�w!,�nc< •r> `• -.S � 'J a l�r: S Y r.;�-i �'• >.3. 7 �. -�'� b� — '�, J�.' 1 a^..."'i , :1.:::i-c,�_ ,1",.,1:y,�s3 y.;.,y£�,� ."'-w� •i.- `�y .� z2•�d t-. r "t 4n' �•� y •� �� r..;._ r :tV- � >'� ;PAYt.T.Q:.T~HEa 'Butte;County. reasUrer r f xf' n�y•'t` < > < Ci ,r i =� > �3 C <""44 40. e "ORDER x • ,.. '" d�4,7`' -z� v� Zai 1.> <,.+ � :,. � -.a ala w:Y :�� y � ;Dyi K'. er r ',ax•, s � ��v: < i-"E:,..^I' s �! r-�_ •, _ R{ Forty Fourand ' • .. x �.. " �. +f'x. r s ML ~ '#1 s. s':t< s.. .v a ..C"Y •'Y .• F t h:' `` Y t. sS 4.; D OLLARS .. ., .- .� ''Y..,r�.;s t! ,.R N✓� �_<�,b\� .�i: �c��'+> ,. ,< ,�s s �' r -.Y '�,�J C 4 r`t '?�.« ,� +r r ^[ �.o: ;'��}1 s. j « .. r v �'i,:.;•.... ,F wj''`f<<. i f'* L k s/ ���!_.c y '4X a .`r :sr`"?�> 1' E f. •. .w r'F>s -7 enter'Dr '*,r_ x --?. r r vY '-w ✓. ws Y > f, :< ..7" :. >. .. �;f. u. .- .l^ r``�.<� a.��l.c � r'.:r i .�: ' '� <✓^ i �2 r �T x� � � � ,. Y� .:s...� �?-,'tz i r i�s ? -r. < • �,c '���� s; ��Orovdie4'CA 95965�r �,���3 ;, ; � ^,, � r r � � r ,�< -,., �. ;� < x � ,t, ,moi , _ .. , 9 �r! i.: � � >� p ✓a � .. 5 i ,L� 7 � v . „R '3 z t Y"` 'L s f * y:x x "�st � • � ? ?7f ' ''F B'.%� yf>z. `'�J`, <x ; vti `'yN.: ,;x..•+, ,l�;I> + 4 \ p. ` E'C.'..,!Y, W�•ryt , .,`i".,� n gs i.. .'•,{.% .669' '; '' >t°r ^�c �' .1 A:'.. -iFr 'S v c~ .t 'A.•"�':' x ! -c �, i ; 4 x z w A» VAR 03 X01'`Ap:#04:7 740 009 " r N.X MEMO2x,r'. � f_.• a,r`.1 x.��.r t:cr y.'9'• z t."l" N< a,a r r.,:�; ••+X i ..<a...r+ -4.� �e?r.•2..p '". y r +- y�_ .. � - l ,t + .I - y fir.. ' :j' ■ ■*'?.. • <i r i ■� + .rf.R p -�' `' •, '. -,�,' } 's} 'l �� . 5�.0 40000130 L `y s RECEIPT• TOTAL - PUBLIC r PUBLIC ENV. NOE/NOD • DATE LAFCO PLANNING FIRE OTHER - APPLICANTS- RECEIVED FROM " NO. RECEIVED WORKS - SALES 'HEALTH F/G FEE RECEIPT 212.3 5 •+s. . OFFICIAL RECEIPT < 1 COUNTY OF.BUTTE -STATE OF CALIFORNIA :OFFICE OF PLANNING' - - > « z , r •t ISSUED BY .e • i' 0 Butte County Department of Development Services %)T Administration-AR o� T�0 7 County Center Drive o 0 Oroville,CA 95965 0 0 o -- o (530)538-7601 Telephone o o Variance File: VAR 03-01 APN: 047-740-009 Applicant: Stephen Schuster/Schuster Homes Date: June 12,2003 4011 Spyglass Rd. Chico, CA 95973 INVOICE VAR 03.01 Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice,the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program. There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program,and are not reflected on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed,you will receive a FINAL INVOICE. The following charges have been applied to the processing of your application: PAID Professional Planner $640.15 $ 640.15 PAID Mapping $73.75 73.75 PAID Clerical $272.25 272.25 Publishing Due TOTAL CHARGES: $ 986.15 The following payments have been applied to your application: Deposit Disbursement: Deposit Date: November 15,2002 Environmental Health .$185.00 Receipt: 20857 land Development $150.00 Total Payment $1,114.00 CDF/Fire Department $43 NOD/Noe Fee $36.00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES-PLANNING DEPOSIT $ 700.00 Deposit Date: IMay 8.2003 Receipt: 21148 $ 286.15 The costs thus far in processing your application have exceeded the deposited/paid amount by: $ - Publishing Charges Due $ 44.40 NOD REFUND WILL BE PROCESSED AFTER PAYMENT IS RECEIVED Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees;deposits;billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to an amount equal to 25%of the original deposit,no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore a balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit,or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event the applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application,the application will be denied. Make checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address. Should you have any questions,please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m.to 4 p.m.,Monday through Friday. AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE June;26,2003 $ 44.40 Biller.CS K:\FISCAL ADMIMBILLINGS 8 REFUNDS\SENT BILLINGS\Schuster VAR 03 1 061203.xis 6/12/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 12:04 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 1 Selection Criteria Applicant (hand sel Include: VAR 03-01 Nickname VAR 03-01 ( Schuster Full Name Stephen Schuster Address Schuster Homes 4011 Spyglass Rd. Chico CA 95973 Phone 1 (530) 894-0894 Phone 2 Phone 3 Phone 4 In Ref To Fees Arrg. By billing value on each slip Expense Arrg. By billing value on each slip Tax Profile Exempt Last bill 5/7/2003 Last charge 4/30/2003 Last payment 5/8/2003 Amount $286.15 Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 11/11/2002 Roni Thornton 34.00 1.50 51.00 Billable 41587 C Clerical APPLICATION SET-UP 11/11/2002 Larry P. 59.00 1.25 73.75 Billable 41595 P Processing 11/19/2002 Steve B. 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 41676 P Processing 12/9/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.00 59.00 Billable 41696 P Processing 12/11/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 Billable 41697 P Processing 12/13/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 Billable 41698 P Processing 6/12/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 12:04 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 2 VAR 03-01:Stephen Schuster(continued) 'Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 12/23/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable 41773 C Clerical PUBLISHING 12/30/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 Billable 41815 P Processing 12/31/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.75 103.25 Billable 41816 P Processing 1/2/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable 41786 C Clerical 1/2/2003 Dan B. 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 41839 P Processing 1/8/2003 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 Billable 41923 P Processing POWER POINT PRESENTATION 1/9/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable 41956 C Clerical MEETING/LETTER 1/9/2003 Steve B. 59.00 0.75 44.25 Billable 41963 P Processing PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 1/14/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 .1.00 45.00 Billable 42082 C Clerical MEETING/LETTER/MINUTES 1/15/2003 Roni Thornton 34.00 0.17 5.78 Do Not Bill 42100 C 0.17 5.78 Clerical PROOF READ MINUTES �a 6/12/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 12:04 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 3 VAR 03-01:Stephen Schuster(continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 2/5/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.15 6.75 Billable 42282 Clerical/Input Packets 2/12/2003 Steve B. 59.00 0.10 5.90 Billable 42341 Phone/Counter Phone call 2/13/2003 Steve B. 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable 42352 Hearings Public hearing 2/14/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.43 19.50 Billable 42374 Clerical/Min Minutes related to applications 4/10/2003 Cheryl S. 45.00 0.33 15.00 Billable 42674 Administrative Billing/administrative tasks not related to actual processing of application 4/25/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 - 0.58 26.25 Do Not Bill 43040 Clerical/Min 0.58 26.25 Minutes related to applications 4/30/2003 Dan B. 59.00 1.00 59.00 Do Not Bill 43114 Reports 1.00 59.00 Agenda Report TOTAL Billable Fees 18.51 $986.15 Do Not Bill 1.75 $91.03 Date Employee Price Quantity Amount Total ID Expense Markup % 1/22/2003 Lynn R. 44.40 1.000 44.40 Billable 43108 Publishing Publishing in newspaper-Chico enterprise TOTAL Billable Costs $44.40 6/12/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 12:04 PM Pre-bill.Worksheet Page 4 VAR 03-01:Stephen Schuster(continued) Calculation of Fees and Costs Amount Total Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable time slips $986.15 Total of Fees (Time Charges) $986.15 Costs Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable expense slips $44.40 Total of Costs (Expense Charges) $44.40 Total new charges $1,030.55 Accounts Receivables DatejID Type Description 11/15/2002 CRED Deposit - Receipt#20857 ($700.00) 1983 5/7/2003 INV Invoice-NOD/NOE Filing Fee $36.00 2322 5/7/2003 PAY Payment-NOD/NOE Filing Fee, Receipt 20867. Check No. 5252 ($36.00) 2323 5/8/2003 PAY Payment ($286.15) 2372 Receipt#21148. Check No. 5900 Total Accounts Receivable ($986.15) New Balance Current $1,030.55 Unapplied ($986.15) Total New Balance $44.40 5kq Butte County Department ofBievelopment Services T TF- '- Administration-AR 7 County Center Drive o 0 Oroville,CA 95965 0 0 0 0 (530)538.7601 Telephone 0 0 c�U N'�y Variance File: VAR 03-01 APN: 047-740-009 Applicant: Stephen Schuster/Schuster Homes Date: May 15, 2003 4011 Spyglass Rd. Chico, CA 95973 PAYMENT RECEIVED&RECORDED DISREGARD 5/14/03 BILLING (5/15/03 BILLING SUPERCEDES PRIOR BILLING) I N V 0 1 C E VAR 03-01 Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice,the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program. There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program,and are not reflected on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed,you will receive a FINAL INVOICE. The following charges have been applied to the processing of your application: Professional Planner $ 640.15 Mapping 73.75 Clerical 272.25 Publishing 44.40 TOTAL CHARGES: $ 1,030.55 The following payments have been applied to your application: Deposit Disbursement: Deposit Date: November 15,2002 Environmental Health $185.00 Receipt: 20857 Land Development $150.00 Total Payment $1,114.00 CDF/Fire Department $43 NOD/Noe Fee $36.00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES-PLANNING DEPOSIT $ 700.00 Deposit Date: May 8.2003 Receipt: 21148 $ 286.15 The costs thus far in processing your application have exceeded the deposited/paid amount by: $ 44.40 TOTAL PLANNING FEES DUE $ 44.40 NOD REFUND WILL:BE PROCESSED-AFTER PAYMENT IS RECEIVED Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees;deposits;billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to an amount equal to 25%of the original deposit,no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore a balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit,or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event the applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application,the application will be denied. Make checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address. Should you have any questions,please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m.to 4 p.m.,Monday through Friday. AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE $ 44,40 May 30, 2003 Biller.CS - K:TISCAL ADMIN\BILLING LETTERS\SENT BILLINGS\051503 Schuster VAR 03-01.x1s -V 5/14/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 3:36 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 1 Selection Criteria. Applicant (hand sel Include: Schuster VAR 03-01 Nickname Schuster VAR 03-01 VAR 03-01 Full Name Stephen Schuster Address Schuster Homes 4011 Spyglass Rd. Chico CA 95973 Phone 1 (530)894-0894 Phone 2 Phone 3 Phone 4 In Ref To Fees Arrg. By billing value on each slip Expense Arrg. By billing value on each slip Tax Profile Exempt Last bill 5/7/2003 Last charge 4/30/2003 Last payment 5/8/2003 Amount $286.15 Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 11/11/2002 Roni Thornton 34.00 1.50 51.00 Billable 41587 C Clerical APPLICATION SET-UP 11/11/2002 Larry P. 59.00 1.25 73.75 Billable 41595 P Processing 11/19/2002 Steve B. 59.00. 0.50 29.50 Billable 41676 P Processing 12/9/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.00 59.00 Billable 41696 P Processing 12/11/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 Billable 41697 P Processing 12/13/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 Billable 41698 P Processing I 5/14/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 3:36 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 2 Schuster VAR 03-01:Stephen Schuster(continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 12/23/2002 Lynn R. .. 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable 41773 C Clerical PUBLISHING 12/30/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 Billable 41815 P Processing 12/31/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.75 103.25 Billable 41816 P Processing 1/2/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable 41786 C Clerical 1/2/2003 Dan B. 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 41839 P Processing 1/8/2003 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 Billable 41923 P Processing POWER POINT PRESENTATION 1/9/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable 41956 C Clerical MEETING/LETTER 1/9/2003 Steve B. 59.00 0.75 44.25 Billable 41963 P Processing PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 1/14/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable 42082 C Clerical MEETING/LETTER/MINUTES 1/15/2003 Roni Thornton 34.00 0.17 5.78 Do Not Bill 42100 C 0.17 5.78 Clerical PROOF READ MINUTES 5/14/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 3:36 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 3 Schuster VAR 03-01:Stephen Schuster(continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 2/5/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.15 6.75 Billable 42282 Clerical/Input Packets 2/12/2003 Steve B. 59.00 0.10 5.90 Billable 42341 Phone/Counter Phone call 2/13/2003 Steve B. 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable 42352 Hearings Public hearing 2/14/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.43 19.50 Billable 42374 Clerical/Min Minutes related to applications 4/10/2003 Cheryl S. 45.00 0.33 15.00 Billable 42674 Administrative Billing/administrative tasks not related to actual processing of application 4/25/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.58 26.25 Do Not Bill 43040 Clerical/Min 0.58 26.25 Minutes related to applications 4/30/2003 Dan B. 59.00 1.00 59.00 Do Not Bill 43114 Reports 1.00 59.00 Agenda Report TOTAL Billable Fees 18.51 $986.15 Do Not Bill 1.75 $91.03 Date Employee Price Quantity Amount Total ID Expense Markup % 1/22/2003 Lynn R. 44.40 1.000 44.40 Billable 43108 Publishing Publishing in newspaper-Chico enterprise TOTAL Billable Costs $44.40 5/14/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 3:36 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 4 Schuster VAR 03-01:Stephen Schuster(continued) Calculation of Fees and Costs Amount Total Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable time slips $986.15 Total of Fees (Time Charges) $986.15 Costs Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable expense slips $44.40 Total of Costs (Expense Charges) $44.40 Total new charges $1,030.55 Accounts Receivables DatelID Type Description 11/15/2002 FRED Deposit - Receipt #20857 ($700.00) 1983 5/7/2003 INV Invoice-NOD/NOE Filing Fee $36.00 2322 5/7/2003 PAY Payment-NOD/NOE Filing Fee, Receipt 20867. Check No. 5252 ($36.00) 2323 5/8/2003 PAY Payment ($286.15) 2372 Receipt #21148. Check No. 5900 Total Accounts Receivable ($986.15) New Balance Current $1,030.55 Unapplied ($986.15) Total New Balance $44.40 COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROVILLE, CA ATR NO 63522 RECEIVES] FROM PLANNING BAG#329 DATE FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH. DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: .518, RECEIPTS: 21133-21148 P—L—A N-N NG AFP-L.FEI=SS GENL 0010 44=1 4210 901601 3,479.01 Pepject Number Ainount.of Fee APN:02B-370-015-JESPERSONISTARR/BETTER BUILDERS-TPM 03.02 $756.04 APW-M9 S30-043-STARRMETTER BUILDERS-[MAR 03('!.3 $.364.32 APN:047-291)�r,6-L NDERS-ADM D3-16 =.00 APW:047-710-001-SCHUSTER HOMES__TTM 03.01 — $1,037.50 Ai•+N:047-7d0-009-SCHUSTER HOMES-VAR 03-01 DOCUMENTICQPY SALES GENL 0010 440WI 4711910 101001 0A3. AUNT MINNIE DEPOSITS PLAN-PERF TR 1001 280 1011305 2,OM.00 (1 ) Project Number Amount of Fee APPS:047-29fl-078-I..APd0ERS-ADM 43-18 $2,000.00 D.O.T.-ALUC PLANNING GENL 0010+ 44=1 4617241 101001 81.50 APN:047-260-198-GUERNSERY-A 03.02 $ 81.50 TO AL $ 59552. APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TREASURER vvhite=treasurer pink--auditor. canary--depositor golden ro .dile G �7 i fF r i RECEIPT JOURNAL RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC IPIlBUC QN. NOEMOD DATE NO. RHCHIV HD WOR88 LAFCO PLANMNO SALES I�ALT/I FIRM PIO PEE OTNBR APPLICANT RECEIVED PROM � 03 z,liX I 3_ 0.43 Se]tPr B,,Ic1eIS C(-I.;!.!. &hn r 5-9.63 2-11JC> rlj6,0' �I58� I �TtfcP" ,Irirc t Jon:rS{/l a. r! [. —_11 '11 a�l�•'a' �1�.3 rb ui! - ns akin 047-,z -o � . `� n3 211 X300 00 I .za.00- ; ;o . _ (-t is Ck4--vt, &-bpi u- Av3-vim f + �t2rnsec� C%K03 �� i F=r 4Q(r�r 15- i J T N SCK f 095 (obe Nub QZ 1 Z 51 ITI _ F,��e(r ?Jai'! l 41e S � Ck--# 05 8ek 0,x2 iUaf- l�L ?,,� JJ i 5 ti 3-ot CGutSf PJl '' c -Mh 1 *F,5©0' t 1 i I I ' I I i i i i I r I COUNTY OF BUTTE 1 1 OFFICE OF PLANNING J I _ I j I I ..�:;a ,-\, .,'>.,. 'f ,�M7,• T: VE e's't .y _ s ,t^:.. `.�BUT,TE�COM UN :�% :•t:>. +;*.\'•.t�"�'`i�!�'r.. •�r� ..�. 'fir<r .+.•�.: :AUEc <r .. .. .•.:�r'-,�a -.. X204 O S . ..... ..s<.e s: ':;' .Y' .�.:-.,. ::.:�.., „.. •<.o._.... •.y> -t,.r•.;,,a` `+r.:4.¢, -ani:,.,.,' y •. .v ..v n n �ry e �, t. \ .., . ..• ,. < , ... ....... ..." :.. TER:.H °.,: �.:.•:.z. ,. <. ... ,;.:.. ,.,,, . . , , ,STEPHEN,J...SCHUSTER;•x t, ;•:;° _ ,�;. d tn� :.�< •? .* : 7:. <� 401.1<.SP.NGLA$S.RD.. FH. >530,894 , , a� t.•' ..,1f. -ii'::b°'r�: S- \ ..yF0. < - v., ��' �:�''�,`'> v ThousandsTh'ree HundranRS ded Twenty Th 65/100.: ,"> r DOLLARS i ' I 07---,x- _ „� >� -� 't ..`. �J�.`C.,V, .!„ '�r.r'�t'''1 +,r ^'s:•Y:•xF �•. s �,' � ` - �,." � -"r'<� ::>;'•r ;`"a 1,`a,: ,.�,::ti< ;<> Y • .ry Butte 6ounf .Develo meet Services.',.;.; .: �`�-• �� ^ti'^:...a%.".xYa�?a';- .,.r...,Y.: ,�•\. CA95965 ,. ,.6� •,,; ., ,... 2.Y.,f�,.: " .,.,<, j..::,. fir:.` �•�>:.$:,.�:.::.!:s�'Y:.... ..., ., ,...Onvulle. . :..... ..:......... ... ,"x.,_.a .. .. � ��=:€>: ..'�. 9;:,: .. •rix, , ♦. .. ., .. .<Y .> e. ..,'�'.>, t.,. .. ... F .. ....... •,`:< .f ';;+ S.E. sierra:moon,tentative;depost. - �::;..�. .. :;'.•.,:;'>,.. . - U'•^:,1r..>� ..:..., A'✓+2,�r`<.":>.�Y...,.Z. I. 0,O19.05 p 2 04; 2 '��0 40`0.00<8 03 • - RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC PUBLIC ENV. NOE/NOD DATE LAFCO PLANNING FIRE OTHER NO. RECEIVED WORKS I SALES HEALTH F/G FEE APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM • - � ' RECEIPT 21148 •' OFFICIAL RECEIPT , COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING • - IISSS D BY Butte County Deparanent ofDevelopment Services vT Administration-AR 7 County Center Drive o 0 Oroville,CA 95965 00 0 (530)538.7601 Telephone o` -'—�' -o Variance File: VAR 037,01 APN: 04:7-740-009 Applicant: Stephen:Schuster/Schuster Homes Date:-April-21,2003 4011:Spygiass.R Chico;`CA`95973 Deposit Date: November-1:5:2002 Deposit Disbursement: _ —'- -----Receipt:" `-20857—_— Environmental Health $ 185:00 Land Development 1.50.00 CDF/Fire Department 43:00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES-PLANNING Deposit 700:00 NOD/NOE Recording fees 36.00 11/15/02 Receipt#20857 TOTAL PAYMENTS: $ 1,114.00 Reduce balance-REFUND OF NOE fee $ (36.00) INVOICE VAR 03.01 Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice,the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program. There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program,and are not reflected on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed,you will receive a FINAL INVOICE. The following charges have been applied to the processing of your application: Professional Planner $ 640.1.5 Mapping $ 73.75.' Clerical $ 272.25 TOTAL $ 986.15 The costs thus far In processing your application have exceeded the deposited or paid amount by: $ 286.15' Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees;deposits;billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to an amount equal to 25%of the original deposit,no processing of'the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore a balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit,or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event the applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application,the application will be denied. Make checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address. Should you have any questions,please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m.to 4 p.m.,Monday through Friday. AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE BY May 5, 2003 $ 286.15 Biller.CS K TISCAL ADMIN\BILLING LETTERS\042103 Schuster VAR 03-01.xis i 5/13/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services % -C i!�► 3:31 PM Pre-bill Worksheet � Page 1 Selection Criteria � e Applicant (handsel Include: Schuster VAR 03-01 Nickname Schuster VAR 03-01 1 VAR 03-01 �=�1 Full Name Stephen Schuster � � Address Schuster Homes 4011 Spyglass Rd. % Chico CA 95973 Phone 1 (530) 894-0894. Phone 2 Phone 3 Phone 4 In Ref To Fees Arrg. By billing value on each slip Expense Arrg. By billing value on each slip Tax Profile Exempt r Last bill 5/7/2003 Last charge 4/30/2003 3!3 S Last payment 5/7/2003 Amount $36.00 Date Employee Rate Hours 3 &tn� Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time B Amt, 11/11/2002 Roni Thornton 34.00 1.5051.00 Billable 41587 C Clerical APPLICATION SET-UP 11/11/2002 Larry P. 59.00 1.25 73.75 Billable 41595 P Processing 11/19/2002 Steve B. 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 41676 P Processing 12/9/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.00 59:00 Billable 41696 P Processing 12/11/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 Billable 41697 P Processing 12/13/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88/50 Billable 41698 P Processing • :. 0 5/13/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 3:31 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 2 Schuster VAR 03-01:Stephen Schuster(continued) j Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 12/23/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 4500 Billable 41773 C ` Clerical PUBLISHING 12/30/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 Billable 41815 P Processing 12/31/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.75 10325 Billable 41816 P Processing 1/2/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45,00, ? Billable 41786 C Clerical 1/2/2003 Dan B. 59.00 0.50 4 9�Y50 ,) Billable 41839 P Processing 1/8/2003 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88 50 Billable 41923 P Processing POWER POINT PRESENTATION 1/9/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.0045.00_;, Billable 41956 C �" Clerical MEETING/LETTER 1/9/2003 Steve B. 59.00 0.75 44.25:- Billable 41963 P Processing PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 1/14/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable 42082 C Clerical MEETING/LETTER/MINUTES 1/15/2003 Roni Thornton 34.00 0.17 5.78 Do Not Bill 42100 C 0.17 5.78 Clerical PROOF READ MINUTES 5/13/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 3:31 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 3 Schuster VAR 03-01:Stephen Schuster(continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 2/5/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.156;75, Billable 42282 Clerical/Input . Packets 2/12/2003 Steve B. 59.00 0.10 % Billable 42341 Phone/Counter Phone call 2/13/2003 Steve B. 59.00 0.25114.75, Billable 42352 Hearings Public hearing 2/14/2003 Lynn R.- 45.00 0.43 1� Billable 42374 Clerical/Min Minutes related to applications 4/10/2003 Cheryl S. 45.00 0.33 X1-5:00; Billable 42674 Administrative Billing/administrative tasks not related to actual processing of application 4/25/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.58 26.25 Do Not Bill 43040 Clerical/Min 0.58 26.25 Minutes related to applications 4/30/2003 Dan B. 59.00 1.00 59.00 Do Not Bill 43114 Reports 1.00 59.00 Agenda Report TOTAL Billable Fees 18.51 $986.15 Do Not Bill 1.75 $91.03 Date Employee Price Quantity Amount Total ID Expense Markup % 1/22/2003 Lynn R. 44.40 1.000 44.40 Billable 43108 Publishing Publishing in newspaper-Chico enterprise TOTAL Billable Coss $44.40 e 5/13/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 3:31 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 4 Schuster VAR 03-01:Stephen Schuster(continued) Calculation of Fees and Costs Amount Total Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable time slips $986.15 Total of Fees (Time Charges) $986.15 Costs Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable expense slips $44.40 Total of Costs (Expense Charges) $44.40 Total new charges $1,030.55 Accounts Receivables DatejID Type Description 11/15/2002 CRED Deposit- Receipt#20857 ($700.00) 1983 5/7/2003 INV Invoice-NOD/NOE Filing Fee $36.00 2322 5/7/2003 PAY Payment-NOD/NOE Filing Fee, Receipt 20867. Check No. 5252 ($36.00) 2323 j Total Accounts Receivable ($700.00) New Balance Current $1,030.55 Unapplied ($700.00) Total New Balance $330.55 Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services Administration-AR 0 TF0 7 County Center Drive o 0 Oroville,CA 95965 0 0 0 o (530)538.7601 Telephone 0 ==' °_ 0 Variance File: VAR 03-01 APN: 047-740-009 Applicant: Stephen Schuster/Schuster Homes Date: May 14,2003 4011 Spyglass Rd. Chico, CA 95973 INVOICE VAR 03.01 Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice,the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program. There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program,and are not reflected on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed,you will receive a FINAL INVOICE. The following charges have been applied to the processing of your application: Professional Planner $640.15 Mapping 73.75 Clerical 272.05 Publishing 44.40 TOTAL CHARGES: $ 1,030.35 The following payments have been applied to your application: Deposit Disbursement: Deposit Date: Environmental Health $185.00 Receipt: Land Development $150.00 Total Payment CDF/Fire Department $43.00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES-PLANNING DEPOSIT $ 700.00 The costs thus far in processing your application have exceeded the deposited/paid amount by: $ 330.35 TOTAL PLANNING FEES DUE $ 330.35 NOD REFUND WILL BE PROCESSED AFTER PAYMENT IS RECEIVED Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees;deposits;billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to an amount equal to 25%of the original deposit,no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore a balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit,or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event the applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application,the application will be denied. Make checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address. Should you have any questions,please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m.to 4 p.m.,Monday through Friday. AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE May 28, 2003 .x $ 330.35 Biller.CS K:\FISCAL ADMIN\BILLING LETTERS\051403 Inv Schuster VAR 03-01.xls r Butte County Departrnent ofDevelopment Services Administration-AR o�V T TFo 7 County Center Drive o 0 Oroville,CA 95965 0 ___ o (530)538-7601 Telephone o ` — = o c�U 14 Variance File: VAR 03-01 APN: 047-740-009 Applicant: Stephen Schuster/Schuster Homes Date: April 21, 2003 4011 Spyglass-Rd. Chico, CA 95973 Deposit Date: November 15,2002 Deposit Disbursement: Receipt: 20857 Environmental Health $ 185.00 Land Development 150.00 CDF/Fire Department 43.00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES-PLANNING Deposit 700.00 NOD/NOE Recording fees 36.00 11115/02 Receipt#20857 TOTAL PAYMENTS: $ 1,114.00 Reduce balance-REFUND OF NOE fee $ (36.00) 1 N V 0 1 C E VAR 03.01 Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice,the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program. There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program,and are not reflected on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed,you will receive a FINAL INVOICE. The following charges have been applied to the processing of your application: Professional Planner $ 640.15 Mapping $ 73.75 Clerical $. 272.25 TOTAL $ 986.15 The costs thus far In processing your application have exceeded the deposited or paid amount by: $ 286.15 Butte County Code 3.44 Hourly fees;deposits;billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to an amount equal to 25%of the original deposit,no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore a balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit,or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event the applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application,the application will be denied. Make checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address. Should you have any questions,please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m.to 4 p.m.,Monday through Friday. AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE BY May 5, 2003 $ 286.15 Biller:CS K:\FISCAL ADMIMBILLING LETTERS1042103 Schuster VAR 03-01.xls s 4/18/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 1:41 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 1 Selection Criteria Applicant (hand sel Include: Schuster VAR 03-01 Nickname Schuster VAR 03-01 VAR 03-01 Full Name Stephen Schuster Address Schuster Homes 4011 Spyglass Rd. Chico CA 95973 Phone 1 (530) 894-0894 Phone 2n,/ Phone 3 Phone 4 � fp, �('" In Ref To ✓ "`"`��,M/ Fees Arrg. By billing value on each slip Expense Arrg. By billing value on each slip Tax Profile Exempt /Ij Last bill Last charge 4/10/2003 Last payment 2/13/2003 Amount $36.00 Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 11/11/2002 Roni Thornton 34.00 1.5051.00_ ', Billable 41587 C Clerical APPLICATION SETUP 11/11/2002 Larry P. 59.00 1.25 73.75 Billable 41595 P Processing 11/19/2002 Steve B. 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 41676 P Processing 12/9/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.00. 59.00; Billable 41696 P Processing 12/11/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 ,; Billable 41697 P �/ Processing 12/13/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88:50 Billable 41698 P Processing 12/23/2002 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45`00 1 Billable 41773 C Clerical PUBLISHING c' a�v 4 . 4/18/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 1:41 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 2 Schuster VAR 03-01:Stephen Schuster(continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 12/30/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.50 88.50 - Billable 41815 P Com/ Processing 12/31/2002 Steve B. 59.00 1.75 1q3.25-) Billable 41816 P Processing 1/2/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.004(� 5.00 Billable 41786 C t-- Clerical 1/2/2003 Dan B. 59.00 0.50 C29.50__ Billable 41839 P Processing 1/8/2003 Steve B. 59.00 1.5088.5 Billable 41923 P Processing POWER POINT PRESENTATION 1/9/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00 } Billable 41956 C Clerical MEETING/LETTER 1/9/2003 Steve B. 59.00 0.75 44.25_) Billable 41963 P Processing PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 1/14/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 `45.00-.) Billable 42082 C Clerical MEETING/LETTER/MINUTES 1/15/2003 Roni Thornton 34.00 0.17 5 A Do Not Bill 42100 C 0.17 X58 Clerical / PROOF READ MINUTES 2/5/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.15 6.75 Billable 42282 Clerical/Input Packets 2/12/2003 Steve B. 59.00 0.10 5.,90 Billable 42341 Phone/Counter Phone call i 4/18/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 1:41 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 3 Schuster VAR 03-01:Stephen Schuster(continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 2/13/2003 Steve B. 59.00 0.25 1475 Billable 42352 Hearings Public hearing 2/14/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.43 19-507 Billable 42374 Clerical/Min Minutes related to applications 4/10/2003 Cheryl S. 45.00 0.33 100-1 Billable 42674 Administrative Billing/administrative tasks not related to actual processing of application TOTAL Billable Fees 18.51 $986.15 Do Not Bill 0.17 $5.78 Total of billable expense slips $0.00 Calculation of Fees and Costs Amount Total Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable time slips $986.15 Total of Fees (Time Charges) $986.15 Total of Costs (Expense Charges), $0.00 Total new charges $986.15 I; Accounts Receivables DatellD Type- Description 11/15/2002 CRED Deposit - Receipt#20857 ($700.00) 1983 2/13/2003 PAY Payment - NOE filing fee, Receipt 20857. Check No. 5252 ($36.00) 2242 2/13/2003 REF Refund-Project Denied $36.00 2244 Total Accounts Receivable ($700.00) New Balance Current $986.15 4/18/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 1:41 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 4 Schuster VAR 03-01:Stephen Schuster(continued) Amount Total Unapplied ($700.00) Total New Balance $286.15 COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OR®VILLE, CA ATR.NO 49063 RECEIVED FROM PLANNING SAO 0 329 DATE 1/1/812002 FUND FIEND DEPT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CGDE CODE AMOUNT_ DEPOSITDATE: 1148 RECEIPTS: 7 PLANNING APPL FEES GENL 0010 440001 4222103W 101001 1,700-00 LAND DEVELOPMENT GENL 0010 44OW4 .4511700 101001 440.00 Project Number Amount of Fee #043-890-069 J&G Person TPM 03-09 $280 #047-740-009 S Schuster var 03-01 $150 EWRONMENTAL HLTH GENL 0010 54NM 4614SOI 101001 416.50 Project Number Amount of Fee #043-890-089 J&G Person TPM 03-09 $231.50 #047-740-009 S Schuster var 03-01 $185 FIRE PLNG ADPL FEE FIRE PROTECT 0100 4617M 101001 172.00 Project Number -' -Amount of Fee #043-690-069 J&G Person TN'03-QC f $129 #047-740-009 S Schuster var 03-01 $43 NOWNOE CLERK'S FILING FE DENZ 0010 47000,1 4612319 101001 72.00 ($36) Project Number �Amount of Fee 0043-690-069 J&D Person TPM 03-09 $36 #047-740-009 S'Schuster var 03-01 f $36 TOTAL $ 29'800.50 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AU05T®R-CONTROLLER - (TREASURER wh4te-tmassrer pink-auditor canary-depositor golden r� 08 e %I I' l l5-0 7190 lss� I V3 1 ,36 -�Yo- r�-rvcr RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC PUBLIC ENV. NOE/NOD DATE NO. RECEIVED WORKS LAFCO PLANNING SALES HEALTH FIRE F/G FEE OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM RECEIPT 20857 O3 ©( OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING ISSUED BY • 5252 SCHUSTER HOMES BUTTE COMMUNITY BANK STEPHEN J.SCHUSTER CHICO,CA 95928 4011 SPYGLASS RD. PH(530)894-0894 904202/1211 04 CHICO,CA 95973 11/13/2002 i Y V N -C PAY TO THE Butte County0 $'"1,114.00 ORDER OF m One Thousand One Hundred Fourteen and 00/100'*"�""'www►wwwwwwwwrwwwwww:wwwww•w****;*tww+***w*www*wwrw*www44iwwwwwwwwwwwwr. DOLLARS v in a LL MEMO Variance for lot 10 Lindbergh Circle Chico CA v TH IZED SIG ATUR 11200 5 2 5 2118 �: L 2 L i 4 20 2 5�:0 4000080 711' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on page 2 APPLICANT'S NAME- (If app'ca ion is d'fferei rom owner an affidavit is required.) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ADDRESS: STR T,C STATE,&ZIP CODE FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) 96MR 03-0/ NAME OF PROPOSE R JECT(If any) c TELEPHONE: a s A°'ft G LOCATION OF PROJECT(Major cross streets and Address+if ny) rX- GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED OWNER'S NAE: TELEPHONE: cz 1 (S-3a ) 0 9</ ADDRESS: /� TY,STATE,&ZIP CODE: - l 1. �t d ZON _ GENER L N EXISTING LAND U E SITE SIZE(in Square Feet or Acres) EXISTING STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) PROPOS D STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) 70 > A (Check One) (OFeck One) 4�S PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑,PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION REQUESTED ❑GL-NERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ REZONED �� iJ �] ❑TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑USE PERMIT - ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP MINOR USE PERMIT F1 { E] BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION NOV 1 5 2002 VARIANCE L�Sl'(Cjj LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION MINOR VARIANCE _ ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMI t3t31�t GC�1MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN _:�P:RNt4,NCDIVIN ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEM ❑OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT(Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division,describe the number and size of parcels.) C ea 174.0- ea7VeA!!W OWNER.CERTIFICATION I CI-RTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER,I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of author'zation a in de the affid it with this application.) DATE: SIGNATURE: K:\I70RN1S\0NII70RM APPLICATION Page I of 2 AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County,Department of Development Services; Print Name of Agent and Phone Number Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for on my property,identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number This authorization allows representation for all applications,hearings,appeals,etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s)rela�tin !t5y1cord title interest. 1 l ( G Owner(s)of Record: (sign and print name) �j d� Print Name D O.. Print Name Signature Signature Architect and/or Engineer: C4-L-1---0 SG l2c�s v //^Nom ea 6 �m�l �T '.f.;Cl yD rxG-trh,FC Print Name of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: S Dov o a T / 1 Total Amount Received: L/ y SAP Number(s) Legal Description l"6(i u"" ` s- .W wners Authorization Zoning Requirements Project Description i Copies of plot plan Taken byReceipt No. S'� E.H. ��� LD /,S-d Plan 707-0 FD y� Payment of the currently required Application.Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion d a�t) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $ as of Make check payable to"Butte County Treasurer". _iAN-3-1999 04:25A FROM: TO:53137795 P:1. 1. pity. :r'3- 02 06: ,_cp ��� r9r 3!�nz1 rd•t 53�J-�" 4�`t� !o> i J6 �2-4 13( 9 4:iEi3i'i: 4Dbl? '4 P:fl-1S '53e- r AGENT A HO RIZA I()N Iro.. ]Book County.Dcpwftento D"eloplem Print l d 1 �. 149tidink Attelr�ss ;S I-P-Tek y autharized to nt+ocess the opeticabon fof 8�I�/,�e, ��^�100� on my pamperfy.jdeMj&W HS jau,.M County AssCswr Prrd Humbor- APNr; 'l'f�i ;.s:;Isar::.tip ?so°�s! c 4 tion��P X16 a�spl tiacse,�►sar��e� �etto.wd'Osign all dOCUMCOW nccessury ror said pweescingt,bud etot imiuding d0cd(S)re'36n$10 tccoca$ t��C�S)olT��ofd: � i�1 aasaal�9'Ii�t u�aase) - '�l �• P®e196�i� �d�12/Ili 'i OwP rinl Nre.e a meutrt[+� • eve4sa a ...�_ omeSigemnene ArchiWee aa►at W W-0L4r41 L : f 'A93[tdvnro U��J+ Y i :.�t'ArstCSld� �ind'S9' A obig Addicts 7v- 'FOR OF O-I4E usm.ONLY vgnfy: L1�ss liszs::d�s�' Total/ia1lovnj ttoceived: RP Fd ®t.ev0 p-meriptivA Own=A uthorizadon T,onsn g Rcgwrcmmtr, Ptoj=t Copies of plot g1Pn T Arn by- K"gipt Wa. PW/L() plan >E.it. CDF _- )ioiODINOF Feats Ieaymom of qse cumeady Mquimd APPlicmiion FCC W'd'tr DCPSit(Any urarsOd ion of"deposit)will be w4urne4 UPM fiA�t�cc;on Cutytnt fee Pe9a this aawlication us mot Make check pay+s®Ec toKB=w4v C'ru mey Kmmorer6- -- et 114.ep�F;idl�saE�x�'A9�. �P Qr 2 NOV 19 2002 JANa-2-4 79 AT 1-2121-5-PI, iID= 1 } SJ t`' Loh L��b COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be"completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed J0 Z_ GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Name�and address pfo er" :and/ r. developer, and/or project sponsor: b tJ 2. Address of project: / 1✓1��-�ir�� ( /� Assessor's Parcel Number: 3. Name, address, and tel phone number of person to be contacted co cerning this project: _ 21Z1IZ!!7 .. rA C 4. List and describe any other related permits and of7 %;oe er public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. Existing general plan designation: r Prs� v 6. Existing zoning district: S "" niI .14NOV 1 CUU4 7. How is land currently used? ! 8U�1'E GOUN��v . ING DIVISION 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Project Description: 9. Site size: ' / Gi"�. (Acres/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached: Yes X No 12. Proposed development schedule AJo 13. Associated projects 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development rl 6 ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services❑ Planning Division ❑ 0 Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 19. If the project involves a minor variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. J� 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. `28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. 29: Substantial change in demand for municipal services \/ (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). J� 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts,'statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Datel Signatur - - .V E NOV 1 5 2002 tali i-COLIN S PL4N1INGZ DIVISION UN K:\Planning\FORMS\Submittal\ENV-INFO.FRM . .0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 I, VARIANCE APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their application packet. Please include this checklist along with your submittal. Applicant Planner 1. 0 A completed, signed, Uniform Application and Environmental Information form. If the application is signed by an agent for the property owner, an agent authorization form must be submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. 2. 0 Payment of the-currently required Application Fee. 3. Thirty-five(35)copies of plans which shall include a detailed site plan drawn to scale. All plans shall be drawn on uniform size sheets norg eater than 24" X 36".The finished plans shall be folded to 8 1/2" x 11". The detailed site plan must include: a. Name and address of Applicant,Engineer,Architect,and/or person who prepared the plan ® �,..rR� 4"17�CS i b. El Property lines and lot dimensions NOV 1 5 2002 1 C. El Assessor Parcel Number(s) and the street address. y BUTTE COLIN F,.ANNING DIVISION _ d. El Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvements on the propertyw -- (including,but not limited to,buildings,driveways,parking areas,wells, septic tanks and leach fields). e. El Distances from any significant natural and man-made features of the property, such as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major tree stands, storm drains, bodies of water, railroads, to the property lines. 1'. North arrow and scale of drawing. All plans shall be drawn to an engineering scale with the preferred scale of 1"=20',with a north arrow preferably oriented to the top of sheet. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED,THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. I . �" i ^V // `� .. C��� o x �. ❑ One copy of an 8 1/2" x 11" transparency reduction of the detailed site plan. l�. All plans must be clear and legible. 4. NECESSAR . FINDINGS OF FACT Each zoning classification and land use has an associated set of development standards which are specified in the Butte County Zoning Code. The California Government Code Section 65906 and 65906.5 and the Butte County Zoning Code establish findings which must be made in order to grant variances from these standards where unique circumstances exist to warrant relief from the strict application of these standards. Variances from the terms of the Zoning Code may be granted only when,because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape,topography,location,or surroundings,the strict application of the Zoning Code deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. Any Variance granted maybe subject to conditions that will assure that the deviation shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated. Variances can not be granted for reductions in lot size, increases in residential density, increase in lot covet-age, or for uses not permitted in a zone. The courts have clearly indicated that variances are not intended to rewrite the County Code and can only be granted if all the findings listed below are made. Further, the courts have indicated the actual, factual basis for these findings must be stated. THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION IS FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WITHIN 10 CALENDAR DAYS. To be completed by Applicant(attach additional sheets if necessary): a. The following exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property in question which do not apply generally to other property under identical zoning classification: b. The granting of the Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights is supported by the following: IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED,THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 2 c. The granting of the Variance will not adversely affect the neighborhood or be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare,or adversely affect property improvements in the neighborhood and zone in which the property is located in that: Additional information may be required in order to clarify,amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Auriculture Commissioner. Signature: z �. Date: i ilf 3 Q AVpficklitrRepresentative Signature: C0.4 Date: Planning Receiving Application K:\forms\submital\variance.frm revised 4/22/96 BKH NOV 1 5 2002LD BUTTE COLIN T`r' NANNING DIVISION IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION 1S SUBMITTED,THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 3 Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 047740009000 047350062000 K:\PROJECTS\VAR\Schuster\labelsVARO SORENSON WENDELL GLIDEWELL RUSSELL E SS 301.doc PO BOX 4209 1055 SAN RAMON DR CHICO CA 95927-4209 CHICO CA 95926 047350063000 047740007000 047740008000 MCINTYRE AMANDA L SCHUSTER STEPHEN J WAGSTAFF WENDELL S&GAYLY 13992 GARNER LN 4011 SPYGLASS RD 13973 LINDBERGH CIR CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95973 047740010000 047740012000 047740013000 BURINGTON MARK S&MARILYN J BARGER JAMES C&PATRICIA A LANE LARRY J&DEBRA 1473 E STARPASS DR 700 WEE DONEGAL 1069 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS FRESNO CA 93720-3446 LAFAYETTE CA 94549-1722 RECWOOD CITY CA 94061 047740014000 047740022000 047740025000 GALLI MICHAEL MEDRANO SAMUEL&GUADALUPE C JEHLE ROBERT W&MARY E TRUS 3171 SANDSTONE 674 GRAFTON PARK DR 1127 SUMMERGARDEN CT CHICO CA 95928-7341 CHICO CA 95926-8602 SAN JOSE CA 95132-2938 047740002000 047740015000 047740017000 SHEPHERD HEATHER J&BRIAN G IMHOFF RONALD A TRUSTEE GALLI MICHAEL 13997 LINDBERG CIR 977 FILBERT AVE 3171 SANDSTONE CHICO CA 95973 CHICO CA 95926-4017 CHICO CA 95928-7341 047740019000 047740020000 047740026000 BOYER MISTS L TENCKHOFF RANDY SUE MORGAN PHILIPPE L 2261 LA ROCCO DR 4076 GUNTREN RD 5 VIA FLORA CT CHICO CA 95928-7629 CHICO CA 95973-8502 CHICO CA 95973-0995 047740027000 047740029000 JAUREGUI ALFREDO SR&TRINIDAD ELLIOTT WILLIAM L&LORAINE W 552 CIMARRON DR 330 FLUME ST CHICO CA 95973-0391 CHICO CA 95928-5400 11AVERW Address Labels Laser 5160® j3 dJ� � —cat—qac (O ZQ401 5Z qoil 6 �k LW t �t �� /Q t ui ii ��i 'ii ,ii iii ui iii iii ii iii ui m iii m iii m lil Ili III III l� III III III I; . III '6utte' Count , I in.a �¢ LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND. BEAUTY - PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 February 14, 2003 Stephen J. Schuster 4011 Spyglass Road Chico, CA 95973 Re: Variance, AP 047-740-009, VAR 03-01 Dear Mr. Schuster: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held a meeting on February 13, 2003, your request for a Variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%, was denied. The North Chico Specific Plan allows a maximum building coverage of 15% of the lot area. Should you desire to appeal this decision you must do so, in writing, with the appeal fee of$50.00 to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville,California,prior to the expiration of the 10-day appeal period which is at 5:00 p.m., Monday, February 24, 2003. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts at this office between 8:00 a.m and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Services Assistant /lr cc: Land Development Environmental Health CDF Building Division BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT -JANUARY 9, 2003 Applicant: Stephen J. Schuster Parcel Size: 38,739 sq. ft. (net), 43,389 File#: VAR 03-01 sq. ft. (gross) Request: Variance to allow building Zone date: March 28, 1995 coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Supervisor Specific Plan allows a District: 3 maximum building coverage of 15% of the lot area Project' Stephen Betts. Planner: Senior Planner G.P.: Agricultural Residential Attachments: Zoning: SR-1 (Suburban Residential, A: General Plan/Zoning Map 1-acre parcels), as modified B: Vicinity Map by the North Chico Specific C: Statement from Applicant, dated Plan November 15, 2002 D: NCSP Draft EIR Visual Resources APN: 047-740-009 Chapter E: NCSP SR-1 Zoning Ordinance Location: On the north side of F: NCSP Summary of Zone District Lindbergh Circle Development Standards approximately 1,100 feet G: Site Plan north of Guntren Road, Chico area I STAFF COMMENTS Staff recommends approval of this variance with findings and conditions. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant requests approval of a variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan (NCSP) allows a maximum building coverage of 15% of the lot area. The 15% maximum building coverage is a development standard that is found in the SR-1 zone of the North Chico Specific Plan. The SR-1 zone outside of the North Chico Specific Plan area does not have a maximum building coverage standard. The applicant intends to build a two-story, 6,043 square foot single family dwelling on a 43,389 square foot (0.996-acres) parcel. This equates to 13.9% coverage of the lot. The project site would also be developed with two garages totaling 1,730 square feet (4%), seven porches that ■ Butte County Planning Commission Agenda Report 0 Page 1 ■ total 1,401 square feet (3.2%), an 800 square foot swimming pool (1.8%), and a 300 square foot BBQ area (0.7%). These structures would result in a building coverage of approximately 23.3% of the parcel's surface. The net area of the project parcel is 38,739 square feet , with a gross area of 43,389 square feet. 4,650 square feet of the parcel is within the road easement for Lindberg Circle. The NCSP does not specify whether net or gross acreage is to be used in calculating the building coverage. The percentage of building coverage was calculated based upon the gross area of the parcel. PROJECT SITE DESCRIPTION The property is undeveloped. The project site is level with no topographic features that would create a hardship for the property. Sewage disposal will be handled by a community sewage disposal system and domestic water supplied by an on-site well. The parcel fronts on Lindbergh Circle, with access to Garner Lane via Guntren Road. The project site is located in a new 30-lot subdivision (Pheasant Landing Unit III) that is being gradually developed with large, conventionally-built luxury homes. ANALYSIS The North Chico Specific Plan and the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the North Chico Specific Plan were reviewed to determine the reason for the inclusion of the maximum building coverage for parcels in the Plan area. In the Visual Resources element of the NCSP Draft EIR, an impact was identified with respect to visual resources: Implementation of the Specific Plan will alter the existing visual qualities associated with rural characteristics south of Mud Creek. With implementation of Specific Plan elements, this will be a less-than-significant impact. It should be noted that this impact only identifies visual impacts south of Mud Creek. The project site is located well north of Mud Creek. Under Project Elements that Mitigate Impact section (page 8-3) of the Visual Resources element, the following policy is found: Inclusion of development design standards in the Specific Plan that address issues of building size, mass, design, landscaping, and other design components, as well as road standards, can help achieve development scale and appearance that blends with and contributes to the existing rural quality of the area. The NCSP implements the above policy in the Development Regulations and Design Guidelines found on page 7-11 and in Table 7-2 (Summary of Zone District Development Standards), both of which are attached to this report. The development regulations and design guidelines apply to all parcels in the SR-1 zone in the Plan area, not just to parcels located south of Mud Creek. 0 Butte County Planning Commission Agenda Report 0 Page 2 ■ 0 It would appear that the maximum building coverage was designed to help prevent structures from creating significant aesthetic impacts. Larger structures have the potential to cause aesthetic impacts by blocking neighbor's views. The North Chico Specific Plan limits the height of structures in the SR-1 zone to 35 feet, which could limit impacts,but that there is no minimum landscaped open space required in the SR-1 zone. The NCSP does not include a definition of"building coverage." Butte County Code section 24- 305.050 defines a building as "any structure having a permanent foundation and a roof supported by columns, or by walls designed, intended and/or used as shelter for the enclosure of persons, animals, chattels, or for use in commercial, industrial or other enterprises." Additionally, Butte County Code section 24-305.430 defines a structure as "that which is built or constructed, an edifice or building of any kind, or any piece of work, artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner." The Director of Development Services determined that building coverage includes patios and swimming pools. Findings for Approval In order to approve a variance, the Planning Commission must establish that special circumstances are applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location and surroundings that cause a variance to County code to be necessary (Butte County Code section 24-50.10). Additionally, the variance must not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated. The project site does not contain any topographic features that could be considered a special circumstance. The size of the parcel could be considered to be a special circumstance; the parcel is too small to accommodate the size of the dwelling that the property owner wishes to build, given the restrictions regarding maximum lot coverage. Larger homes have become more common over the last ten or so years throughout the Chico area. Larger dwellings, like the house that is proposed to be built on the project site, were most likely not contemplated at the time the North Chico Specific Plan was written. A special circumstance could be that dwellings being constructed in the new subdivisions in the project area are much larger than what the NCSP considered. Some of the structures that are proposed to be placed on the project site, such as the swimming pool, porches, and the BBQ area, would not create significant visual impacts since they would not be large structures that would significantly a neighbor's view. The swimming pool in particular would not create any visual impact since for the most part it would not extend above the surface of the ground. No attempt was made by Planning staff to determine if other parcels in the North Chico Specific Plan area exceeded the 15% building coverage maximum. Some of the parcels in the Plan area may exceed the 15% percent lot coverage due to their size in relation to the larger homes in the area. 0 Butte County Planning Commission Agenda Report 0 Page 3 ■ From staff's review of the NCSP it is difficult to determine why a 15% lot coverage restriction is imposed. From an aesthetics standpoint, the proposed dwelling would be similar in style and design with many of the luxury homes already developed in the project area. Percent lot coverage can also influence drainage characteristics and impacts, but in this case, drainage for the subdivision has been mitigated through on-site retention, which has already been developed. Even with the approval of this variance, fully 76% percent of the lot will be left undeveloped. The Drainage Element of the North Chico Specific Plan Draft EIR did not mention limiting building coverage on a parcel as a means of helping to reduce stonmwater drainage. Alternatives The most logical alternative would be to reduce the size of the proposed dwelling and accessory structures so that the building coverage would be no greater than 15%. However, this would not allow the property owner to build the house and structures he desires. A lot line adjustment with the adjacent parcels to increase the size of the project parcel could not be approved because these parcels are already at the minimum parcel size. A merger with the undeveloped parcels adjacent to the project parcel may not be feasible because of the expense and/or because no one may be willing to sell their parcel. Other Issues The Butte County Building Division, Fire Department/CDF, Public Works Department, and the Environmental Health Division did not object to the project or recommend any conditions. Conclusion The special circumstances noted in the previous sections allow for the findings necessary to grant this variance and indicate that the adjustment authorized would not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: I. This proposal has been determined to be Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Specifically, Section 15305(a) - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations, Class 5, of the CEQA Guidelines exempts variances to setbacks not resulting in the creation of any new parcel. II. Approve Variance 03-01 for Stephen J. Schuster subject to the following findings and conditions found in Exhibit A: 0 Butte County Planning Commission Agenda Report ■ Page 4 0 0 • A. This Variance may be granted because special circumstances applicable to the property exist, including size, location, or surroundings, and the strict application of the building coverage maximum would deprive the property owner of privileges enjoyed by other property owners, and would not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties zoned SR-1 in the North Chico Specific Plan area, as supported by the. following facts: 1. The increase in maximum building coverage from 15% to 24% would not create a significant visual impact to the project area. 2. Many of the proposed structures, such as the swimming pool,porches, and BBQ area are not tall structures and would not impact any neighbor's views. 3. 76% of the lot would be undeveloped with structures. 4. Dwellings much larger than have previously been developed in the project area are being constructed on the parcels in newer subdivisions in the project area. 5. The increase in building coverage would not cause a significant increase in stormwater runoff. The additional stormwater runoff caused by the increase in building coverage can be adequately handled by the retention pond serving the subdivision that the project site is located in. 6. Other landowners in similar situations could apply for a variance. i i 0 Butte County Planning Commission Agenda Report ■ Page 5 0 0 EXHIBIT A VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE VAR 03-01 VARIANCE NO. 047-740-009 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant.to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below, Stephen J. Schuster is hereby granted a Variance to allow a building coverage of up to 24% of the lot. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Division 1. The parcel may have a building coverage of up to 24% of the lot. 2. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Attachment G" and date-stamped November 18, 2002, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 3. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. 4. Prior to issuance of the Variance, pay any outstanding project-related processing fees, and/or Department of Fish and Game fees. 5. If this entire matter or any finding, action or condition of this matter is appealed to the Board of Supervisors, the applicant or any other developer/operator other than the applicant agrees to indemnify the County of Butte from liability or loss related to the approval of this project and agrees to sign an indemnification agreement in a form approved by County Counsel before the Board's appeal hearing. If the application is not appealed, this condition is deemed satisfied. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this variance, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. 0 Butte County Planning Commission Agenda Report 0 Page 6 0 Dated: Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this variance does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Chairman, Butte County Planning Commission CC: Land Development Building Division Environmental Health Division Butte County Fire Department/CDF Assessor's Office I 0 Butte County Planning Commission Agenda Report 0 Page 7 0 Vicinity Map M 'ar Ribad -77-WH-T-RQad— ek Drive Pnkow,Ri�ad Rock Cre Ole Location�ct Roa AnitaRnad filso I and*ng Road -j Chico ,a 3 Airport 0 0 CO Thom. treeDfive atan RnAA I I'-*--"-''----- 0 Nord BM N% State HM VAR 03-01 047-740-009 S (; IHLis7rF. IP, •� : :..s �-; ��` ; ; unto!Pn e N. X 'tl. .q '� �.:'�' �.a= '�?�+'" '-�' �'p�' •1 - +� �5�2'' � � f0i ' moi: ' S �7 Keefer Rd ;.� r.v. C J. . C SR-1 C' y ° SR-1 cc E. m CL CL O " Shorthorn Dr -------------- -- Gran e R Ri ---- 'o T-01r --- Gr n do_ L _ ___ ___ r-771 Tul ni Dr Project Location `` ° ' � N 7 N J -1 • SR-1 SR-1 - h'�7 0 moi.`-TT•. 700 0 700 1400 2100 2600 3500 4200 Feet BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CONMUSSION Applicant: Stephen Schuster Owner: Mark Burington Hearing Date: January 9,2003 @ 9:30 am EAsting Zone: SR-1 (Suburban Residential, l acre min.) N Supervisorial Request: Variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan allows District#3 a maximum building coverage of 15%of the lot area Assessor Parcel No: 047-740-009 Me:VAR 03-01 (SPACE FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE In The Matter Of Notice of Public Hearing. No . D-Qng COU PLANNING'cOMMISSION• ' AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBucHEARING, , Notice'is hereby given by;-ithe;�LButte 'County, State of California Planning*;Commission that a public-hearing will - SS. be heldon .Thursday, . County of Butte iJanuaryy 9,2003,in,the Butte,County.',Board r of SupervisoPs `,4PRoom,' The undersigned resident of the county of County,,-Administration. Center,25 County Can Butte, State of California, says: ter Drive,.Oroville;Cali" - fornia;regarding.the fol-. lowin items:: �. That I am, and at all time herein mentioned n "E;>3E cicnl w was a citizen of the United States and nota party m' ' -MMI FROM ENVI=�' • to nor interested in the above entitled matter; 13oNMENTA REVIEW;f, 9:30 a.m.-'Mary Dorn; that I am the principal clerk of the printer and Use Permit to operate a Day. Carev sidility,for, publisher of more:than 12,children and.within 150 feet of an existing large family.care The Chico Enterprise-Record facility:.T,hesproperty`Is The Oroville Mercury-Register zoned R,1 ( esidential) and is'.located.on the east side..of1 Madera That said newspaper is one of general circula- Lane,approximately 270 feet north;'ofPillsbury_. tion as defined by Section 6000 Government Road;In the north Chico Code of the State of California, Case No. 26796 area."APN 007-120-009 (CS)(UP,02-21')+��,.* , by the Superior Court of the State of California, 9:30 a.m.-Stephen v: • Schuster,.Variance,'to� in and for the County of Butte;that said newspa- allow:bullding coverage per at all times herein mentioned was printed on'a•pparcelao'be:24%:, ,The North'Chico Specif- and published daily in the City of Chico and is Planlallows aimaxi County of Butte;that the notice of which the mum building coverage- of'15V of the'lov area: . annexed is a true printed copy,was published in The property is zoned' SR-1 .(Suburban.'Resi= said newspaper on the following days: dgntial-1 acre parcels). and is .located-on the north side of.Lindbergh. Circle,;.-y appiozimately 1100 feet north of.Gun- Dec. 27, 02. tren,Road,.Chico area.,. APN:047=749-009.(SB)_ • (VAR 03-01) �•:d y,= ;.,,The above mentioned.. :applications;and smaps ' Dated January 2, 2003. are on,file and available (or:public vlewing at the' at Chico, California. office bf the Biutte Coun- ty.•_�Development *Ser- .vices Department,Plan= Wing Division;7 County Center•Drive,;Oroville, ( t ture) California:'For,lhforma= tion call:(530)538-.7601 ` (Monday through Firda'y;.;. 8:00,a:m. to 4:00.p.n) Comments may •be sub; mitted io.,writin' t any time prior to thehearing. or,orally;at.the'meeting. listed';aboveiof as'may• eco to'.9, later tlate.Upon°action taken , by"the?Planning"Com= mission:on:.the;project Wap :may;be Mile.". with the:-Clerk,;oft the'. ' Board1of.Supervisors:, The appeal,period•is;iff days.,,if,you challenge '�• the above application in,. court,you maybe limit= ed to raising only those,' , issues you or•someone•, else raised at the public,. hearing described in,this notice or ;in,writtenxcor re sppondence,"delivered' to the Planninq.Commjs sion,`.at,or prior to the, public hearingga BUTTE COUNTY- ` " PLANNING 4 if t COMMISSION,: I F284388 Pub: tte coull y LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 January 9, 2003 Stephen J. Schuster 4011 Spyglass Road Chico, CA 95973 Re: Variance, AP 047-740-009, VAR 03-01 Dear Mr. Schuster: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held January 9, 2003, the public hearing was continued open to February 13, 2003, at 9:30 a.m., to consider your application for a Variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan allows a maximum building coverage of 15% of the lot area. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Services Assistant Ar cc: Schuster Homes k:\fonns\continue.frm Schuster Homes 4011 Spyglass Rd Chico, CA 95973 SCL 483969 (530)894-0894 _ r ---- 5 November 15, 2002 NOV 1 5 2002 �D Mr Dan Breeden *<iA ";'�j pt .�t�a_ING DIVIS101V Butte County Planning Dan Enclosed is s site plan showing all the improvements proposed for Lot 10 Lindbergh Circle. The problem and the reason for the request for a variance are a Lot%coverage issue. The property owners,their architect, and my self have worked for almost a year putting together a plan for the Burrington Family. We submitted their plan for plan check back in August and only heard of this coverage requirement, as the plan check was nearly complete. As you can see on the site plan provided the actual living sqft is only 13.8 % with the garages at 4.2%and covered porch areas at 3.2%bringing the total coverage up to 21.2%. If we went with one small garage and no porches to provide needed shade we could make the 15%coverage,but this is not practical. In addition to the home sqft the owners of lot 10 wish to enjoy their back yard by building a pool and a covered BBQ area . which brings the sqft coverage up to 23.7%. I have talked with county staff as to the origin of the 15%rule. No one knows where it came from and as of today this is the only home that has been denied a permit because of it. I have contacted Stephen Honnycutt of Heritage Partners,the designer of the North Chico Specific Plan,as to the reasoning for the 15% coverage rule ori only SR-1 lots. He also does not know and was surprised by the rule. As the Developer of Pheasant Landing subdivision, and other subdivisions in the area, this home design and size fits the character of the development, which consists of other large custom. We are requesting this variance to allow the Burrington to build their home as designed with a pool and covered BBQ. Thank you for your help , Step n J. chuster :. . SUMMARY:4F;ZONE 01 TRICT:p1=VEhOPMENT:STANDARpS::. Design Standard SIR-3 SR-1 R-1 R-2 R-3 BP C-1 C-2 M-2 M-1 P-Q Lot Configuration Minimum Lot Size- Interior 3 ac. 1 ac. 8,000 sf 4,000 sf 6,500 sf 6,500 sf 2000 sf None3 None3 Nonei None' " Corner 3 ac. 1 ac. 8,000 sf 4,000 sf 7,000 sf 7,000 sf 2000 sf None3 None3 None3 None' Minimum Lot Widlhi- Interior 130' 130' 65' 45' 50' 50' 25' 25' None3 None3 None' Maximum Building Coverage 10% 15% 50% 55% 60% 60% 60% 60% 70% 60% 50% Minimum Landscaped Open Space: None None 40% 30% 25% 25% 5% 5% 5% 5% 30% Parking Required OH-Street Spaces 2/du 2/du 2/du 2/du 2/du 1/300 sf 1/200 sf Code4 Code4 Code4 Code' Surfacing Material None None pcc/acs pcc/acs pcc/acs pcc/acs pcc/acs pcc/acs pcc/acs pcc/acs cc/acs Building Setbacks&Configurations Front 50'6 50'a 20' 20' 20' 20' None? None? None Nonef None Rear 20' 20' 15' 15' 10' 5' Nones Nones Nones Nones None Side 5' 5" 5' 5' 5' 5' Nones Nones Nonea Nones None. i Mini mum Distance Between Buildings on the 10' 10' 10' 10' 1lY 10' None None None None / Maximum Building Height 35' 35' 35' 35' 40' 50' 50' S0' So' 50' 35' ' Measured from property tine on edge of right-of-way • Measured from centerline of street,or 2a from property line,whichever is greater. } Percentage of total lot area. ' Front setback shall be equal to adjacent use for a minimum distance of 50'where ' Served by public sewer,or must meet onsite disposal standards. abutting an"R"zone. ' Requirements vary by specific use within zone and shall be as set forth in the Butte County Code,Section • 5'required if lot abuts an"R"district;if lot is on corner adjacent to an"R'district,side 24-35. yard shall be 15 feet. s Portland cementitious concrete concrete or asphaltic concrete. 8. VISUAL RESOURCES I � EXISTING CONDITIONS The Plan area is located in a setting characterized as being primarily rural in nature. There are several developed residential subdivisions in the study area that are surrounded by open fields with scattered areas of orchards and some row crop production. The transition between open lands and residential development located on generally large lots, the low density nature of existing development, and the presence of open fields, barns, and other agricultural structures help establish a visual quality usually associated withrural settings. Existing narrow roads also contribute to the sense of"rural atmosphere" that is evident in the area. The majority of the Plan area is flat, although.slightly sloping terrain is found in the northern portion of the project area along Keefer Road. There are no significant physical landforms that represent outstanding scenic features or resources. Topography is slightly more varied in the northern portion of the study area along Keefer Slough and Keefer Road, where it becomes more rolling. Tree cover also increases in this area with oak woodlands found north of Keefer Road and riparian habitat associated with Rock Creek. An oak-lined plateau/ridge surrounded by rolling oak grasslands is located outside and immediately adjacent to the project area south of Keefer Road and east of Hicks Lane. Several drainageways traverse the project area, and in conjunction with localized areas of native tree cover and orchards,provide an element of visual relief and interest over otherwise flat and open fields. These creeks are dry most of the year and have little or no tree cover or riparian habitat present adjacent to the banks. Rock Creek at the northern portion of the project area, however, does partially support oak woodland and riparian habitat. Within the project area, two types of views or vistas are prominent, depending on whether the area is undeveloped or developed. In undeveloped portions of the study area, expansive panoramic views of large, open fields are present. In these areas, open grassland, rangeland, and agricultural fields are the primary elements of foreground and midground views from roadways and area residences. The most distinctive visual feature in these areas are long-range views of the foothills to the east, which frame views of the Plan area as seen from State Route 99, Hicks Lane and Keefer Road. The existing residential development in the Plan area is varied,ranging from large,older ranch homes to more modern, smaller residential subdivisions, such as the newer subdivision located east of State Route 99 and north of Sycamore Creek. Within existing developed areas, long- range views of the distant mountains often are obscured. Views are dominated by the immediate development in the neighborhood and associated landscaping and tree cover. In the northern portion of the study area along Keefer Road, lot size and tree cover increases. The oak woodland in this area is the primary visual feature, and also serves to screen development. The existing Songbird Subdivision north of Keefer Road provides a good example of 8-1 Visual Resources Draft Environmental Impact Report • � , North Chico Specific Plan development that has incorporated trees of a former orchard within the site layout and employed design features such as varied building orientation, open fencing, and staggered setbacks, which helps maintain a rural feeling. The scenic quality of a landscape refers to the overall visual impression that generally is influenced by several factors: landform, vegetation, watercourses and other prominent physical features, and type and extent of development, as well as important vistas, view corridors, scenic features, and/or notable landforms. In terms of visual resources, there are no significant visual features in the North Chico Specific Plan area. While there are areas of localized tree cover, drainage courses, and distant views of the adjacent foothills, there are no significant visual or scenic features that create an unusual scenic quality for the area. However, these same physical attributes contribute to the overall rural visual character of the area which also is defined by large expanses of open space with agricultural fields and structures interspersed with residential development. IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standards of Significance: Criteria for determining significant visual impacts include loss of major vistas, blockage of view corridors, alteration of significant landforms, andlor development that is out of scale with the character of the surrounding area. Impact: Implementation of the Specific Plan will alter the existing visual qualities associated with rural characteristics south of Mud Creek. With implementation of Specific Plan elements, this will be a less-than-significant impact. The proposed 1- to 3-acre lot sizes north of Mud Creek are consistent with existing development patterns in that area and future development will be of a similar scale associated with the existing semi-rural character of the area. The area between Mud Creek and Sycamore Creek is the planned location of the higher density "Village Core" area. Development in this area will result in a more urban appearance. The area generally is buffered from the larger-lot areas north of Mud Creek by the existing drainages and planned greenbelt areas. The intensity, siting, scale and design of future development will affect the overall visual quality of the area. Large, massive buildings without visual relief or architectural elements to break up building mass are not incorporated into the overall design. Landscaping, or lack thereof, also can detract from the ambiance of the area if substantial amounts of ornamental species are used, which may not visually blend with native species found in the surrounding area. The Design Guidelines presented in Section 7 of the Specific Plan establish guidelines for development of commercial buildings, roads, and landscaping within the Village Core. The Plan also provides an extensive greenbelt network to break up development and provide buffers. With implementation of these guidelines, the visual impact of development is considered to be less-than-significant. visual Resources 8-2 Draft Environmental Impact Report North Chico Specific Plan Project Elements that Mitigate Impact • Provision of open space corridors/buffers throughout the area and preparation of landscaping guidelines that identify species type and planting arrangements compatible with the natural setting will help maintain and enhance the rural character of the neighborhood. • Inclusion_of development design standards in the Specific Plan that address issues of building size, mass, design, landscaping, and other design components, as well as road standards, can help achieve development scale and appearance that blends with and contributes to the existing rural quality of the area. !l !1 8-3 Visual Resources NORTH CHICO SPECIFIC PLAN SR-1 (Suburban Residential) 1. Site Requirements ❑ Lot Area Required: 1 acre minimum lot size per dwelling unit, including corner lots. 0 Lot Width Required: 130 feet as measured from property line at edge of right-of-way, including corner lots. ❑ Front Yard Required: 50 feet centerline of adjacent streets, or 20 feet from property line, whichever is greater. ❑ Rear Yard Required: 20 feet. ❑ Side Yard Required: 5 feet. ❑ Maximum Building Height: 35 feet. ❑ Maximum Building Coverage: 15% of lot area. ❑ Minimum Landscaped Open Space: None ❑ Off-street Parking Required: 2 spaces per dwelling unit, no surfacing material required. 2. Uses Permitted (1) One single-family dwelling per parcel, not including tents or trailers; (2) Accessory buildings pertinent to the permitted uses; (3) Agricultural uses, including'the keeping of animals, subject to the.animal maintenance requirements of Sections 24-35.1 through 24-35.3 of the Zoning Code. 3. Uses Requiring Use Permits The following uses are permitted subject to securing a use permit in each case: (a) Public and quasi-public uses including churches, firehouses, and public utility buildings; (b) Sales tract office. Development Regulations and Design Guidelines 7-11 . 4 f I � i _ 3 l , I ON \ II 11 Ia ---Qru1-d - 61 ,)Soo �Nl o F4. ) .__��� �,.►� mad b< 2 b i . 1 !_ � �. �' 1 ! • ' / a �: i ' f k+ �._ '. 1 4 n r I 1 1 i {� �•... � t !E. E �'* E � - .. k � -. 6- i �'. I ,i r �+- _ � .r _ .. �.�, �•,tet` � +- 1 � f f .r• - . . � _ _ r- t: E, y . ., � � S tT .._ .,.. � .� t .5 .- - � i i _ r. .. t ' " i� , �'�' _ + �,�, I�_ i � _ :...� a .Schuster Homes A land development Co. 4011 Spyglass Rd Chico CA 95973 SCL#483969 (530)894-0894 Cell 570-6400 Hm 894-5875 Fax 894-2256 Jan 6, 2002 Butte County Planning RE: Lot 10 Lindbergh Circle "Variance" We are requesting this variance because of the hardship it places on the Owners of Lot 10 Lindbergh Circle. The Burringtons purchased this lot with the intention of building a large Custom Home. Homes built or currently under construction are also large custom luxury homes. The Burringtons have worked with an architect and engineer for over a year at great expense designing their dream home. At no time were they aware that a 15% coverage existed. As far as we know this would be the first time that this 15% coverage rule has ever been enforced or encountered in the North Chico Specific Plan area. Any other SR-1 lot outside of the NCSP area would allow for this home to be built. Lot 10 was purchased by the Burringtons because of its North/South orientation. It was only after their plan was plan checked that this 15%coverage rule arose. We are requesting that this variance be granted because it places and unfair limitation on their rights to use and enjoy their property. I have included a petition signed by every lot owner in Pheasant Landing 3 Subdivision,which says they are in favor of the home being built in their neighborhood. The neighbors welcome it and we are hoping after all the time, money and effort spent that the Burrington home will be built. Thank you V E Stephen J. Schuster D Schuster Homes JAN - 8 2003 BUTTE COUNTY 4 FLpNNING DIVISION Pheasant Landing Unit 3 Butte County Planning Commission As lot and homeowners in the Pheasant Landing Unit 3 Subdivision we are in favor of a variance to allow the Burrington Residence to be built as per plan on Lot 10 Lindbergh Circle Chico CA. This home will be a welcome addition to the other large custom homes in our neighborhood. ac; zz .l- z1?j6'c C ..r y 9 - . Hutto Y L A N D O F NATURAL W E A L T H A N D BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 January 2, 2003 Stephen J. Schuster 4011 Spyglass Road Chico, CA 95973 Re: Variance, AP 047-740-009, VAR 03-01 Dear Mr. Schuster: Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan allows a maximum building coverage of 15% of the lot area north side of Lindbergh Circle approximately 1,100 feet north of Guntren Road,Chico area. Should you have any concerns with the report or conditions of approval,please contact us in advance of the meeting so that we may work together to resolve your concerns. A public hearing has been set for January 9, 2003, at 9:30 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. Should you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact Stephen Betts of this office at 538-7601, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, 0� Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Services Assistant Enc. cc: Schuster Homes j:\wpdocs\pclts\schedule.mrg BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT -JANUARY 9, 2003 Applicant: Stephen J. Schuster Parcel Size: 38,739 sq. ft. (net), 43,389 File#: VAR 03-01 sq. ft. (gross) Request: Variance to allow building Zone date: March 28, 1995 coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Supervisor Specific Plan' allows a District: 3 maximum building coverage of 15% of the lot area Project Stephen Betts Planner: Senior Planner G.P.: Agricultural Residential Attachments: Zoning: SR-1 (Suburban Residential, A: General Plan/Zoning Map 1-acre parcels), as modified B: Vicinity Map by the North Chico Specific C: Statement from Applicant, dated Plan November 15, 2002 D: NCSP Draft EIR Visual Resources APN: 047-740-009 Chapter E: NCSP SR-1 Zoning Ordinance Location: On the north side of F: NCSP Summary of Zone District Lindbergh Circle Development Standards approximately 1,100 feet G: Site Plan north of Guntren Road, Chico area STAFF COMMENTS Staff recommends approval of this variance with findings and conditions. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant requests approval of a variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan (NCSP) allows a maximum building coverage of 15% of the lot area. The 15% maximum building coverage is a development standard that is found in the SR-1 zone of the North Chico Specific Plan. The SR-1 zone outside of the North Chico Specific Plan area does not have a maximum building coverage standard. The applicant intends to build a two-story, 6,043 square foot single family dwelling on a 43,389 square foot (0.996-acres) parcel. This equates to 13.9% coverage of the lot. The project site would also be developed with two garages totaling 1,730 square feet (4%), seven porches that 0 Butte County Planning Commission Agenda Report 0 Page 1 ■ I total 1,401 square feet (3.2%), an 800 square foot swimming pool (1.8%), and a 300 square foot BB area 0.7% . These structures would result in a building coverage of approximately 23.3% Q ( ) g g pP Y of the parcel's surface. The net area of the project parcel is 38,739 square feet , with a gross area of 43,389 square feet. 4,650 square feet of the parcel is within the road easement for Lindberg Circle. The NCSP does not specify whether net or gross acreage is to be used in calculating the building coverage. The percentage of building coverage was calculated based upon the gross area of the parcel. PROJECT SITE DESCRIPTION The property is undeveloped. The project site is level with no topographic features that would create a hardship for the property. Sewage disposal will be handled by a community sewage disposal system and domestic water supplied by an on-site well. The parcel fronts on Lindbergh Circle, with access to Garner Lane via Guntren Road. The project site is located in a new 30-lot subdivision (Pheasant Landing Unit III) that is being gradually developed with large, conventionally-built luxury homes. ANALYSIS The North Chico Specific Plan and the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the North Chico Specific Plan were reviewed to determine the reason for the inclusion of the maximum building coverage for parcels in the Plan area. In the Visual Resources element of the NCSP Draft EIR, an impact was identified with respect to visual resources: Implementation of the Specific Plan will alter the existing visual qualities associated with rural characteristics south of Mud Creek. With implementation of Specific Plan elements, this will be a less-than-significant impact. It should be noted that this impact only identifies visual impacts south of Mud Creek. The project site is located well north of Mud Creek. Under Project Elements that Mitigate Impact section (page 8-3) of the Visual Resources element, the following policy is found: Inclusion of development design standards in the Specific Plan that address issues of building size, mass, design, landscaping, and other design components, as well as road standards, can help achieve development scale and appearance that blends with and contributes to the existing rural quality of the area. The NCSP implements the above policy in the Development Regulations and Design Guidelines found on page 7-11 and in Table 7-2 (Summary of Zone District Development Standards), both of which are attached to this report. The development regulations and design guidelines apply to all parcels in the SR-1 zone in the Plan area, not just to parcels located south of Mud Creek. 0 Butte County Planning Commission Agenda Report ■ Page 2 0 It would appear that the maximum building coverage was designed to help prevent structures from creating significant aesthetic impacts. Larger structures have the potential to cause aesthetic impacts by blocking neighbor's views. The North Chico Specific Plan limits the height of structures in the SR-1 zone to 35 feet,which could limit impacts,but that there is no minimum landscaped open space required in the SR-1 zone. The NCSP does not include a definition of"building coverage." Butte County Code section 24- 305.050 defines a building as "any structure having a permanent foundation and a roof supported by columns, or by walls designed, intended and/or used as shelter for the enclosure of persons, animals, chattels, or for use in commercial, industrial or other enterprises." Additionally, Butte County Code section 24-305.430 defines a structure as "that which is built or constructed, an edifice or building of any kind, or any piece of work, artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner." The Director of Development Services determined that building coverage includes patios and swimming pools. i - Findings for Approval In order to approve a variance, the Planning Commission must establish that special circumstances are applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location and surroundings that cause a variance to County code to be necessary (Butte County Code section 24-50.10). Additionally, the variance must not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated. The project site does not contain any topographic features that could be considered a special circumstance. The size of the parcel could be considered to be a special circumstance; the parcel is too small to accommodate the size of the dwelling that the property owner wishes to build, given the restrictions regarding maximum lot coverage. Larger homes have become more common over the last ten or so years throughout the Chico area. Larger dwellings, like the house that is proposed to be built on the project site, were most likely not contemplated at the time the North Chico Specific Plan was written. A special circumstance could be that dwellings being constructed in the new subdivisions in the project area are much larger than what the NCSP considered. Some of the structures that are proposed to be placed on the project site, such as the swimming pool, porches, and the BBQ area, would not create significant visual impacts since they would not be large structures that would significantly a neighbor's view. The swimming pool in particular would not create any visual impact since for the most part it would not extend above the surface of the ground. No attempt was made by Planning staff to determine if other parcels in the North Chico Specific Plan area exceeded the 15% building coverage maximum. Some of the parcels in the Plan area may exceed the 15% percent lot coverage due to their size in relation to the larger homes in the area. 0 Butte County Planning Commission Agenda Report ■ Page 3 ■ l From staff's review of the NCSP it is difficult to determine why a 15% lot coverage restriction is imposed. From an aesthetics standpoint, the proposed dwelling would be similar in style and design with many of the luxury homes already developed in the project area. Percent lot coverage can also influence drainage characteristics and impacts, but in this case, drainage for the subdivision has been mitigated through on-site retention, which has already been developed. Even with the approval of this variance, fully 76% percent of the lot will be left undeveloped. The Drainage Element of the North Chico Specific Plan Draft EIR did not mention limiting building coverage on a parcel as a means of helping to reduce stormwater drainage. Alternatives The most logical alternative would be to reduce the size of the proposed dwelling and accessory structures so that the building coverage would be no greater than 15%. However, this would not allow the property owner to build the house and structures he desires. A lot line adjustment with the adjacent parcels to increase the size of the project parcel could not be approved because these parcels are already at the minimum parcel size. A merger with the undeveloped parcels adjacent to the project parcel may not be feasible because of the expense and/or because no one may be willing to sell their parcel. Other Issues I� The Butte County Building Division, Fire Department/CDF, Public Works Department, and the Environmental Health Division did not object to the project or recommend any conditions. Conclusion The special circumstances noted in the previous sections allow for the findings necessary to grant this variance and indicate that the adjustment authorized would not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: I. This proposal has been determined to be Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Specifically, Section 15305(a) - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations, Class 5, of the CEQA Guidelines exempts variances to setbacks not resulting in the creation of any new parcel. II. Approve Variance 03-01 for Stephen J. Schuster subject to the following findings and conditions found in Exhibit A: ■ Butte County Planning Commission Agenda Report 0 Page 4 ■ ! • A. This Variance may be granted because special circumstances applicable to the property exist, including size, location, or surroundings, and the strict application of the building coverage maximum would deprive the property owner of privileges enjoyed by other property owners, and would not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties zoned SR-1 in the North Chico Specific Plan area, as supported by the. following facts: 1. The increase in maximum building coverage from 15% to 24% would not create a significant visual impact to the project area. 2. Many of the proposed structures, such as the swimming pool, porches, and BBQ area are not tall structures and would not impact any neighbor's views. 3. 76% of the lot would be undeveloped with structures. 4. Dwellings much larger than have previously been developed in the project area are being constructed on the parcels in newer subdivisions in the project area. 5. The increase in building coverage would not cause a significant increase in stormwater runoff. The additional stormwater runoff caused by the increase in building coverage can be adequately handled by the retention . pond serving the subdivision that the project site is located in. 6. Other landowners in similar situations could apply 1 for a variance. ■ Butte County Planning Commission Agenda Report 0 Page 5 0 EXHIBIT A VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE VAR 03-01 VARIANCE NO. 047-740-009 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below, Stephen J. Schuster is hereby granted a Variance to allow a building coverage of up to 24% of the lot. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Division 1. The parcel may have a building coverage of up to 24% of the lot. 2. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Attachment G"and date-stamped November 18, 2002, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 3. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. 4. Prior to issuance of the Variance, pay any outstanding project-related processing fees, and/or Department of Fish and Game fees. 5. If this entire matter or any finding, action or condition of this matter is appealed to the Board of Supervisors, the applicant or any other developer/operator other than the applicant agrees to indemnify the County of Butte from liability or loss related to the approval of this project and agrees to sign an indemnification agreement in a form approved by County Counsel before the Board's appeal hearing. If the application is not appealed, this condition is deemed satisfied. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this variance, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. 0 Butte County Planning Commission Agenda Report 0 Page 6 0 Dated: Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this variance does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Chairman, Butte County Planning Commission CC: Land Development Building Division Environmental Health Division Butte County Fire Department/CDF Assessor's Office 0 Butte County Planning Commission Agenda Report 0 Page 7 0 Vicinity Map , M R(.)ad I T- Road Rock Creek Drive RenkowR, 6ad Project Location Keef&Roa Anita; felgan La deng Road E (D Chico -5 Airport 9 0) A 0 V E 00 Thomtree'Nve 0 0 Nord BW El�l- N% Stafga HM VAR 03-01 047-740-009 S (; FIIJS7rF. R �"l>`n� g •yJ.'�'�u'� � f4 �� d `VS't�sYi' ��k� � A k �,� _,.,„�3��' .> '' e5 r o ■e® 1 e r wee �R\,: b M�N`,� ��Y � iS�'ry(�Y{t,} ti1+5•y5.14 � �Y �, WAX-- A RA BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CONMUSSION Applicant: Stephen Schuster Owner: Mark Burington. HearingDate: Supervisorial Request: Variance to allow building coverage on a parcel be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan allows District#3 maximum buildingor047-7-40-0091 1 r. iYi',•�•�"ri`�rrS;�rSi�:: •,`:%3?;;�'i;i?i'ii'i.i�:f '� iii'•S[{S.:. L -.;:: :; ''�;.'..:::�� i%:::`v'Sriirr Sas�it:5 ;: i;i;i;;':?:•:::::::: .,�<:s; SR- i .... ..- I 11 AR 1 loll � ,:; -� ■ice :► � -� .a 1 ■� ,� is . yw}}, J ,. ,1 2800 3500 4200 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CONDUSSION Applicant: Stephen Schuster Owner: Mark Burington Hearing Date: January 9,2003 @ 9:30 a.m. x1sting Zone: SR-1 (Suburban Residential, 1 acre min.) Supervisorial Request: Variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The Nordi Chico Specific Plan allows District#3 maximum building of 15%of the lot area. Assessor047-740-009 ' 1 1 ;a on.,11IM111 Wt,GLAV3 01" ir)r-rLt j trGP OL t}.7tCCf �0_0: CH.,-All I-OC() UP:AV If 0-1-U Ii„411(ot:r 1 uuq ;t,) OU z iX11.r:6} to Or-5-to\'' .U1 J" ', f.) r:' iL ! 11 O"4! 1; 1. ! 'l�ln 1"C 1G IL J ONS' Cf }yf,.71.(tt�i �"W' In. tr L1 d" :C);33 •! ,►:jr ;r,u x>IaRC;�fi �.tu�: SIS 1 ("rnr.rLN Kc?�gr u�ia}' j :.�tl;u.-� j v LLTJ}.Ga'tt: dw'.4 c,i et.c r'Vcl {ja•j C'1.: 01 -11.11 COU4,11A 01 X� ' ' . — -1 •- _' - t- � •I } r _ _ + —• ._ +mac ar�reae�.�[�y�.��iar^rroaana�' ` 1 � 1 ��rt�jJ1 �•I.1 ,. _ 1 r r 2- 0 i • BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on Thursday, January 9, 2003, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center,25 County Center Drive,Oroville,California,regarding the following items: ITEMS DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 9:30 a.m. - Mary Dorn, Use Permit to operate a Day Care Facility for more than 12 children and within 150 feet of an existing large family care facility. The property is zoned R-1 (Residential)and is located on the east side of Madera Lane,approximately 270 feet north of Pillsbury Road, in the north Chico area. APN 007-120-009 (CS) (UP 02-21) 9:30 a.m. - Stephen J. Schuster, Variance to allow building.coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan allows a maximum building coverage of 15% of the lot area. The property is zoned SR-1 (Suburban Residential— 1 acre parcels) and is located on the north side of Lindbergh Circle, approximately 1,100 feet north of Guntren Road, Chico area. APN 047-740-009 (SB) (VAR 03-01) The above mentioned applications and maps are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Development Services Department,Planning Division,7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. For information call: (530) 538-7601 (Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) Comments may be submitted in writing at any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. Upon action taken by the Planning Commission on the project an appeal may be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. The appeal period is 10 days. If you challenge the above application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to,the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION To be published in the Oroville Mercury on Friday, December 27, 2002. ■ Chapter 24 of the Butte County Code ■ 4 24-305.050 Building: Any structure having a permanent foundation and a roof supported by columns, or by walls designed, intended and/or used as shelter for the enclosure of persons, animals, chattels, or for use in commercial, industrial or other enterprises. 24-305.060 Building,Accessory: A detached subordinate building,the use of which is incidental to that of the main building on the same lot or to the use of the land. 24-305.070 Building Area: The total amount of ground area occupied by all buildings and structures on a parcel of land. 24-305.080 Building, Nonconforming: A building or structure or a portion thereof lawfully existing at the time the zoning ordinance affecting the property on which said building is situate becomes effective which was designated, or structurally altered, for a use that does not conform to the use regulations of the zoning district in which it is located. 24-305.090 Building Site: A specifically defined parcel which can accommodate a building or group of buildings together with all yard and open space as required in the zoning district. 24-305.095 Camping: Occupying or maintaining for occupancy any place for temporary living, sleeping or, other human occupancy purposes. "Camping" does not include: the parking or storage of an unoccupied and otherwise unused trailer coach, recreation vehicle, or tent trailer on a privately owned parcel, as defined in Section 24-305.31; occupying a trailer coach, or recreation vehicle, connected pursuant to County permit to permanent sewage disposal and water supply systems; or occupying a trailer coach or a recreation vehicle for any accessory use allowed in the applicable zoning district. 24-305. 097 Contiguous parcels: Any two(2)properties which share a mutual boundary. Property shall be considered as contiguous units even if it is separated by roads, streets, utility easements or railroad rights-of-way per Government Code Section 66424. 24-305.098 Convenience Store: A retail establishment the provides basic food and beverage products at a neighborhood level. Sales of gasoline and prepared foods "to go" may or may not be offered. h 24-305.098.10 Density - Residential density is the number of dwelling units per acre when I or moreC'" dwellings would be permitted on an acre (e.g., four(4) dwellings/acre). When more than one (1) acre is required per dwelling, density is expressed as the number of acres per dwelling (e.g., five (5) acres/dwelling or one(1) dwelling per five (5) acres). Density can be expressed as "gross density" or "net i1 density". as defined below: lJ a. Gross density - the number of dwelling units divided by the total area of a parcel or project, inclusive of all easements and rights-of-way. b. Net density-the number of dwellings per acre, where the site area used in the calculation does not include access easements,rights-of-way, land dedicated to and accepted by a public agency, or the surface area of any water body. Net density shall be used when, as allowed by zoning, a project proposes more than one (1) dwelling per acre. ■ Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance ■ VI - 5 '4 Schuster Homes A land development Co. 4011 Spyglass Rd Chico CA 95973 SCL#483969 (530)894-0894 Cell 570-6400 Hm 894-5875 Fax 894-2256 Jan 6, 2002 Butte County Planning RE: Lot 10 Lindbergh Circle"Variance" We are requesting this variance because of the hardship it places on the Owners of Lot 10 Lindbergh Circle. The Burringtons purchased this lot with the intention of building a large Custom Home. Homes built or currently under construction are also large custom luxury homes. The Burringtons have worked with an architect and engineer for over a year at great expense designing their dream home. At no time were they aware that a 15% coverage existed. As far as we know this would be the first time that this 15% coverage rule has ever been enforced or encountered in the North Chico Specific Plan area. Any other SR-1 lot outside of the NCSP area would allow for this home to be built. Lot 10 was.purchased by the Burringtons because of its North/South orientation. It was only.after their plan was plan checked that this 15%coverage rule arose. We are requesting that this variance be granted because it places and unfair limitation on their rights to use and enjoy their property. I have included a petition signed by every lot . owner in Pheasant Landing 3 Subdivision, which says they are in favor of the home being built in their neighborhood. The neighbors welcome it and we are hoping after all the time, money and effort spent that the Burrington home will be built. Thank you Stephen J. Schuster ELANNING E Q 4 E Schuster Homes - 8 2003. TE COUNTY DIVISION Pheasant Landing Unit 3 Butte County Planning Commission As lot and homeowners in the Pheasant Landing Unit 3 Subdivision we i are in favor of a variance to allow the Burrington Residence to be built as per plan on Lot 10 Lindbergh Circle Chico CA. This home will be a welcome addition to-the other large custom homes in our neighborhood. �.n-T- i co E�1-1►L- M.�r�br1 . • L 44 1 ZY 2 J2 h uc. e� VVELOPMENT'SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING DIVISION ,��TTFo o 7 County Center Drive o 0 Oroville, CA 95965-3397 0==reg_ - o Telephone: (530) 538-7601 c0U N'�y FAX: (530)538-7785 TO: Building Manager FROM: Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Stephen J. Schuster, Variance - VAR 03-01 DATE: November 19, 2002 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. If a response cannot be submitted prior to December 3, 2002, please call Stephen Betts at (530) 538-7153. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention.to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for March 13, 2003.before-the: Fx—] Planning Commission F-1 Development Review Committee PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan allows a maximum building coverage of 15% of the lot area PROJECT LOCATION: north side of Lindbergh Circle approximately 1,100 feet north of Guntren Road, Chico area, Identified as APN#047-740-009 County Supervisor District No: 3 COMMENTS: (Please be specific. Letters or additional comments may be attached): P0E5 Logy COVER-40E U/AWr5 EYMJD TO AtL /ti(PWUlOUS SU eFA6Z7T �ooL DEek ? Cux- 'WAue-5 f Doha Amf'S 7 f3AsKe uu, 4L I By: Date: o oZ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES wTrF PLANNING DIVISION E E 0 OO 7 County Center Drive 0 0 Oroville,CA 95965-3397 0 5 o Telephone:(530)538-7601 NOV 2 1 2002 0 — o 0 FAX: (530)538-7785 c�U N'�y [TF�POUNTI TO: Public Works Direct PLANNI FROM: Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Stephen J. Schuster, Variance - VAR 03-01 DATE: November 19, 2002 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness. of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. If a response cannot be submitted prior to December 3, 2002, please call Stephen Betts at (530) 538-7153. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for March 13, 2003 before the: IX-1 Planning Commission Development Review Committee PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan allows a maximum building coverage of 15% of the lot area PROJECT LOCATION: north side of Lindbergh Circle approximately 1,100 feet north of Guntren Road, Chico area, Identified as APN#047-740-009 County Supervisor District No: 3 COMMENTS: (Please be specific. Letters or additional comments may be attached): �[J�U n r •� -f By: / G Date: 1172. RECEIVE® N 0 V 2 0 2002 COUNTY OF BUTTE LAND DEVELOPMFNT nw it 0 `DEPARTMENT OF ES. o��TTFo PLANNING DIVISIO ® C 0 o �� NO 7 County Center Drive o _ o Oroville,CA 95965-3397 NOV 2 1 2002 0 "' o Telephone: (530) 538-7601 c0U N X FAX: (530) 538-7785 , BUTTE COUNTY Pi ANNfNr mimom TO: California Department of Forestry FROM: Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Stephen J. Schuster, _Variance - VAR 03-01 DATE: November 19, 2002 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. If a response cannot be submitted prior to December 3, 2002, please call Stephen Betts at (530) 538-7153. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for March 13, 2003 before the: 171 Planning Commission F-1 Development Review Committee PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North -Chico Specific Plan allows a maximum building coverage of 15% of the lot area PROJECT LOCATION: north side of Lindbergh Circle approximately 1,100 feet north of Guntren Road, Chico area, Identified as APN#047-740-009 County Supervisor District No: 3 COMMENTS: (Please a specific. Letters^or additional co ments may be'attarchhed): 0 l.�X ., �2Q_C-42_ v By: Date: 1-0 Z DEPARTMENT OF 'VELOPMENT SERVICES �VTTF PLANNING DIVISION oc 0 0 7 County Center Drive oviron, �l _ ° Oroville,CA 95965-3397 ►ift h ° _ -_-_ c Telephone: (530)538-7601 Np o C_ y o FAX: (530)538-7785 7Co�n V 0 2001 DUN'S U Center TO: Environmental Health FROM: Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: (Stephen-J:Sc-huster,-Variance—V-AR-03=0.1 DATE: November 19, 2002 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. If n response cannot be submitted prior to December 3, 2002, please call Stephen Betts at (530) 538-7153. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for March 13, 2003 before the: F .Planning Commission Development Review Committee PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan allows a maximum building coverage of 15% of the lot area PROJECT LOCATION: north side of Unndbergh Circle approximately 1,100 feet north of Guntren Road, Chico area, Identified as APN#04� 7-74-DQ9-- D County Supervisor District No: 3 COMMENTS: (Please be specific. Letters or additional comments may be attached): i�eco��nPin �r'ay ici/o torr�'�ons. By: C. a ,t6>-� Date: OZ— Z—oma D W E Environmental Health DEC 4 2002 NOV 2 1 2002 BUTTE COUNTY Chico,CA PLANNING DIVISION i -- -t _.R_.�....� 1 r_._ __._. _..........,._.� � �r �t�'i i rj ' _ ._w .,J� �is. �. , � y`R,. x, .� 1 AP 047-740-009 Schuster, Stephen VAR 03-01 ------------------------ .4,J F--- --- --- ---- --- ------- ---- - ----- ---- -------- ---- --- -------- --- ------------- Mailing List Distribution >;Y :.....:....... �-- • i .... ...... .. . .... b .ANN". N. • r I ■ , � rr 10 1 [gill 0 IrK.=. P. 19 loll � r .a ■ �t I �® I � A � I BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COABUSSION L AppUcant: Stephen Schuster Owner: Mark Burington Supervisorial1I-EAsting Zone: SR-1 (suburban Residenfial, I am min.) Request: Variance to allow building coverage .n a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan allows 'I District#3 maximum . . . . of the , i No: 047-7,4&.M 1 1 .-www.+lc•w+w.w.e..w+.o^,ow.r.4......e.r++e...w n. w+.m±wrw+.�..�.wawr.+w.ww.wnw.w�rww.rn.raw�r�ww rfu.rrn.,r of'llfliu`^orw s oL;7„v)of fur Int arcs �rzr>�as►�.�,v►�cf�/��: (rt�-�d0'ix)� t:t1��AV9 Ul-o KrOlTv1: ;jILimu r,w gljl lit,pn-191TA', 7m rutafr uU L tvjLr*.r io pc a"fa Lpf% `"oup;jau,ebrcilit•1,f'a j)!ytracl-�,3 �trbc_t��.,ugi (2rtj,rrcp-,s 1fGNO..J.rtr'rj-j SCVr UAW) /blYj�tsat: ?,rh,:�,u 2^pn:t:t. C�,��rr,►.: fj�JLj;'�fsLflfuj'.1u �°�''� 'Jo o _ Ick, ,hc� ►A4: '79Ai�'iYilS1°�■ ! 1 l V^ 1 ' `r , �, 1 62 KGI IL 1 -«w,.an+..r.....w......rur_e•r+w..a..wo.a '- —- - - - ...wrr�ww.rw_.n.....r.r..-w..w+...+. - -- _ ...y r+-.u.rr�+...-w:rw« r.----- LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: VAR 03-01 AP# 047-740-009 APPLICANT: Stephen J. Schuster, 4011 Spyglass Road, Chico, CA 95973 PHONEM : (530) 894-0894 OWNER: Mark Burington ' REPRESENTATIVE: Schuster Homes 4011 Spyglass Road Chico, CA 95973 REQUEST: Variance to allow buildingc o� e on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan allows a maximum buildingcoverage of 15% of the lot area I SIZE: 1.0 Acre LOCATION: north_ side of Lindbergh Circle approximately 1,100 feet north of Guntren Road, Chico area SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT # 3 EXISTING ZONING: SR-1 (Suburban Residential, 1- acre parcels),.(as modified by the North Chico Specific Plan) ZONING HISTORY: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: I , SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: AR (AQricultural-Residential) APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: ASSIGNED PLANNER: Stephen Betts Date Application Received 11/15/02 Date Project Assigned 11/19/02 I 30 Day Complete 12/15/02 Preset Hearing Date 03/13/03 • "DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: AP# Cq 40 SiY-oS95� APPLICANT: S T6=�l,F��✓ S'� �S,/�-7 OWNER: 044ak REPRESENTATIVE: -31,631tk'- PROPOSED REQUEST: to be filled out by person taking in application) FINAL REQUEST: (to be filled out by project planner) ogl OLA 1oU\AAk*n4 C�le('44Z on a og�cel 6peei-�ie f lop alkowa -t bpi\acnj C:evcr-g4 C- o-F ( S 72) o-f -4-ML SIZE: �•�,�G LOCATION: ��-F Sc L�.✓�(ic>-e G ?Gly foo 1,/,00 c :C2r✓ O SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT#_ EXISTING ZONING: Nord►-• cv-N� GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Q 2 : s�c , cv/p A k4 G�wT �-vT�r©k'r .4-T *t S i4l,,? 2 wdu(d A--Ilia c-f-W o.,1 J,,41c- 56,& 1lTTv'tI, mw,L9 64!-cry !^k—;, IS(,vod0.1 .rte AA15wvtJ Ivo khe"55,4-�re ASSIGNED PLANNER: !; Ne 86t!K PLANNERS INITIALS Date Application Received 15'//0y 0,4- Date Project Assigned j 1 j 110-2- 30 0230 Day Complete LAS��L 0 2- NOV 18 2002 Preset Hearing Date 13 4464 03 - ------___� Bi1(.1ECOUNi,, N ANNINC DIVISION c + � "' i� • � : "* ��` ��� � ,..�? .. �,:�.�..._M...._�. � _..._ _.._ ._.. 1 •. a � • � 1 J 0 • COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST APPLICATION: DATE: County Offices and Cities: _Chief Administrative Officer _2C:—De`velop-Services-Director- Public_WorW-Director -X-Environmental-Health Oseewr _Buildirig_Manager Sheriff -- _BCAG ALUC- -6m-wpee Air Quality Mgmt. _Butte Co.Farm Bureau Biggs _Gridley _Chico _Oroville _Paradise _Chico Airporf Commission _Information Systems Dept. _Animal Control =ion Irrigation District: Butte Water --Biggs/W.Gridley Water _Durham Irrigation _OWID _Paradise Irrigation _Richvale Irrigation Table Mountain Irrigation _Thermallto Irrigation _Other Domestic Water _Butte Water District _California Water Service Co. _Del Oro Water Co. _OWID _Thermalito IrrigationDistrict _Other Sewer _Butte Water District _Themalito Irrigation _Sterling City Sewer Main _Skansen Subdivision(CSA 21) _L.O.A.PUD Fire Protection -X--Califomia-Department of-Forestry--, _EI Medio Fire Protection District Recreation Districts _Chico Area Recreation _Durham Area Recreation _Feather River Rec.&Park Paradise Recreation&Park _Richvale Recreation &Parks Utilities PG&E North-Chico _Chambers Cable TV _Pacific Bell _PG&E South-Oroville _Viacom Cable TV State Agencies CalTrans(Traffic) _Dept of Water Resources _Dept of Fish and Game _Forestry(Attn:Craig Carter) _Dept of Parks and Rec. _Highway Patrol _Central Reg.Water Quality Cont _Caltrans,Aeronautics Program. _Off.of Governmental&Env.Relations _Department of Conservation _Off.of Mining Reclamation _Dept.Social Services,Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies' US Forest Service _US Bureau of Land Management _US Fish&Wildlife Service _Army Corps of Engineers _National Marine Fisheries Sservice Other Districts,Agencies,Committees,etc. _Lime Saddle Dist _Community Association School Districts Drainage _Butte Env.l Council Reclamation _Cal Native Plant Society _Butte Co.Mining Committee _Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. _Butte Ck.Watershed Conservancy _Mosq.Abatement Oroville/Butte Co K:\PLANNING\FORMS\DISTR.LIS Schuster Homes 4011 Spyglass Rd Chico, CA 95973 SCL 483969 (530)894-0894 November 15, 2002 NOV 1 5 2002 Mr Dan Breeden eUI TE COUNTY Y PLANNING DIVISION Butte County Planning Dan Enclosed is s site plan showing all the improvements proposed for Lot 10 Lindbergh Circle. The problem and the reason for the request for a variance are a Lot%coverage issue. The property owners,their architect,and my self have worked for almost a year putting together a plan for the Burrington Family. We submitted their plan for plan check back in August and only heard of this coverage requirement, as the plan check was nearly complete. As you can see on the site plan provided the actual living sqft is only 13.8 % with the garages at 4.2%and covered porch areas at 3.2%bringing the total coverage up to 21.2%. If we went with one small garage and no porches to provide needed shade we could make the 15%coverage, but this is not practical. In addition to the home sqft the owners of lot 10 wish to enjoy their back yard by building a pool and a covered BBQ area which brings the sqft coverage up to 23.7 %. I have talked with county staff as to the origin of the 15%rule. No one knows where it came from and as of today this is the only home that has been denied a permit because of it. I have contacted Stephen Honnycutt of Heritage Partners,the designer of the North Chico Specific Plan, as to the reasoning for the 15%coverage rule on only SR-1 lots. He also does not know and was surprised by the rule. As the Developer of Pheasant Landing subdivision, and other subdivisions in the area, this home design and size fits the character of the development,which consists of other large custom. We are requesting this variance to allow the Burringtons to build their home as designed with a pool and covered BBQ. Thankour ou for help Y Y P +Stepnchuster I ��..r' r l` , ,.. �R, !3 .1 i. •ts it ,Si. ji! ` t• • ., �.. ... .. ,�' .. . t�.3 r+•1 . , ,. . i, _ �¢! ,ttf �i+R'll l.is ai. .r , ! !et•, ,'�i��-. �... `i�,� .. �'- . .� t iii ; +:'R,t � '1', J _ �- � ,/'it ,`r�., r . �. ."° .. :3+: ;t+, / '�' .1. .'!� 'i ..'h+. ',i+, .J ... . 1a fir. 'J: ai 7' s' . ,s(.q i 1. .S• .l.t�) 13.l1, t��..}:�3 ri' ili,f ! 'r., t.<. .I:., i. .. f�i' , .. .� .. '1 . t� .. .. •� � '1; .,i il.', /tji., .'.1� ,.e+ ;4t' ...'1!i i}'+ ' :1.�1 '�: � , •r• t, �.. ' . ,, t ..t. .t!_ . ., i t ` t , .. . Q.... � .. � ! • . •� � f DEPARTMENT OF tVELOPMENT SERVICES v� T aroF PLANNING DIVISION o 0 7 County Center Drive o 0 Oroville,CA 95965-3397 0 - o Telephone: (530) 538-7601 c�UN'�y FAX: (530)538-7785 TO: FROM: Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Stephen J. Schuster, Variance - VAR 03-01 DATE: November 19, 2002 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. If a response cannot be submitted prior to December 3, 2002, please call Stephen Betts at (530) 538-7153. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for March 13, 2003 before the: Planning Commission Development Review Committee PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan allows a maximum building coverage of 15% of the lot area PROJECT LOCATION: north side of Lindbergh Circle approximately 1,100 feet north of Guntren Road, Chico area, Identified as APN#047-740-009 County Supervisor District No: 3 COMMENTS: (Please be specific. Letters or additional comments may be attached): By: Date: I i I 'I I I S ^. 32 T.23N. R. E. M.D.S.& 'M. 47- 74- cu - � 4 7 74 0 66 0 !U • SWO1'53T 125.00 203.84 143.00 14100 143.00 122.19 415.62 13 14 15 16 17 18 O4 13 O 15 O O 12 ^� N 1.15Ac 83Ac N 91Ac N .9 rAc .91Ac N .94Ac �ti• 6.71Ac ?xg 94 14300 1 14J.W 14303 J2.43 • $ O LINDBERGH CIRCLE m 11 12 180.00 180.00 1W.42 89AC o 23 22 21 20 •'s COT B" 'q, x 249.90 1; .83Ac mg 21 g 20 a 19 ^ 18 19 wi g 10 S N O 89Ac 200.00 N 1. 14Ac N 1. 14Ac 1.33Ac 1.05Ac u 24 219.92 � 35 3� 8 z 3 8 24J.15 ❑ 8 G 10 g 86AC 8 180.00 180.00 170.00 8 29 O � 26 27 28 $ 28 .89Ac O - 200.0, .94Ac 249.94 25 8 2 S 8 s 8 2 7 8 271.J6 2 8 ( 8 9 g 8 2 4 8 N 1. 14Ac ry 1. 14Ac N 1.07Ac N 30 O _ ao o �9 .89Ac .83Ac 1.04Ac 244.24 180.00 180.00 180.00 170.00 a LINDBERGH CIRCLE �s 7 155.00 143.00 143.00 143.00 143.00 143.00 63.51 26•38 r ` A 7 6 5 4 3 2 j 1.05Ac " 99 8 O OO 8 1 O 33926 ti• ^ $ ,� h n N h ICT 'V O i. 2..33Ac .9OAc .9OAc .90Ac .90Ac N .9OAc 1.0OAc = S t. i 6Ac '`V `R (COMMON *1RF1) a111if1� g7 128.02 ?3621 Gj V�/CI' I - t Z 328.99 155.00 143.00 r4Z00 143.00 143.00 98.00 46• < ,_ GARNER LANE Butte County Assessor's Mop 44 Book 47, Page 74 NG?E Nwa paab a. fw �t nd p�rpo� 0* anap not oa ot" h"parte CWAW Or P5 GATED aV 6-11-2002 PHF4S4NT LANDING SUBDIVWN UNIT 3 153 MOR' 41-43 2-5-2002 Wer PSI XM ON 6'11'2002 EFfbL7JYE 20W" RML PMwdm book 47 poem QI POW m flw �tEt s Offim . 1 REVISIONS BY I R) �e nMui� q ewvec�oa+Rem. . 010 ® 1313 ® ® ® � ® V ® ' I W ao FRONT VIEW O ' i H 1113 ® ® ® t ® ® . 0 El GI if f o LEFT VIEW i GARAGE LEFT VIEW u , ' J ' ® ® ® 10 LL Z .. z Z F- o l- B ® e 1111FBI1771011o00 Z , N ❑ D 0® 0 w $ a m GARAGE RIGHT VIEW RIGHT VIEW I 7374 SQ.F?T. t: LIVABLE I' 1685 S '.FT. GARAGE i �. 847 Sq.FT. I PATIO RON P a SCALE: STAIRWAY BY OTHERS nATE: I 1 _ I • 8 ' PAGE 1111 OF 13 REAR VIEW 4, BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on Thursday, January 9, 2003, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center,25 County Center Drive,Oroville,California,regarding the following items: ITEMS DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 9:30 a.m. - Mary Dorn, Use Permit to operate a Day Care Facility for more than 12 children and within 150 feet of an existing large family care facility. The property is zoned R-1 (Residential)and is located on the east side of Madera Lane,approximately 270 feet north of Pillsbury Road, in the north Chico area. APN 007-120-009 (CS) (UP 02-21) Stephen J. Schuster, Variance to allow building coverage on a parcel to be 24%. The North Chico Specific Plan allows a maximum building coverage of 15%of the lot area. The property is zoned SR-1 (Suburban Residential— 1 acre parcels) and is located on the north side of Lindbergh Circle, approximately 1,100 feet north of Guntren Road, Chico area. APN 047-740-009 (SB) (VAR 03-01) The above mentioned applications and maps are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Development Services Department,Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. For information call: (530) 538-7601 (Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) Comments may be submitted in writing at any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. Upon action taken by the Planning Commission on the project an appeal may be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. The appeal period is 10 days. If you challenge the above application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to,the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION To be published in the Oroville Mercury on Friday, December 27, 2002. I_ t 11 T COUNTY OF BUTTE ,- ��po v i4 4� �= 4-ICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT:. . iW CEIWD c� 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVEK&90,E OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397' y ' AN .2 2 , RETU,F SERVICE REQUESTED ;L:-ITE COLr.% Y � � LTi_ Bj�w_ ��`` .� - .• PUBLIC 0477400150 i� IMHOFF RO C l y HEARING � �� `�M 977 FILBERT A /l��► CHICO CA 95926-4077�1J NOTICE --------------- . _ . - id f►!I: ;1r��ilt,,il,i:l2ti���il�j;,l,i3:i;i;;i vI6'1`Eh _ ` �. �� � � i _.. :. .__ ; ._� I ._._ .� i I �~ � .�.�. � ..� O i .. __ .. �� .�= .__ �� ---- +-' COUNTY OF BUTTE _ - i a AOYlt ICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECEDE �® ; 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - 9 1" OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 a p RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED BUTT E COUP _ . t. •a f SER�RCES PUBLIC047740012000 BARGER JAMES C&PATRICIA A HEARING 700 WEE DONEGAL lY LAFAYETTE CA 94549-1722 a' RETURN 0TICE. \/ RETURN SENDER TO SENDER ,;1 BARGER 13961 LINDBERGH CIR CHIC 0 (;A 95973-d5 t0 r` .. j 3.3 � i t • • • •r r • �r ..fit ' ,Sasa13t %-?Zz �c 1 1 i ...._. �, ..._. i _"'_ � ..._ �. :-- ,� :=::� :::.� ...� ,} ._._. ...._. 3 ::::_: { ._.._ .. ._._ ._.� � ::�� s ....... ',.�- � r,l COUNTY OF BUTTE . t apo V i<< I ICE'OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECEIVED M M ' 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE x d M 24102 OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 w CO2 in Big _ I ` 8. 1�1Ib1tSGJE RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED BUTTE COUNTY DE%TLOY.%?Ev C SERVICES PUBLIC � - � 047740010000 vI, BURINGTON MARK S &MAR,LYN J e ' O JJ �!t! 1473 E STARPASS DR HEARING v A� JJvv ( FRESNO CA 93720-3446 NOTICE /31RN / >._ RETURN TOSENDERBURINGTON 1453 MANZANITA AVE. CHICO CA 95926-1613 -0 ei e,-,zw3-::J`�-� �IIItt;�llti�ltl�ftll�i;l:tll,t� ,I 11 ! t II li ! I I 'tl I i i l i i .:1 -1 111 ,1 111 Yl it 1 i'II ill 1 11 1 11 1 tl �` � � i 't `; . ....� i r _e i .�..�. 1 � +� �ii .�. 1 ...,� .�.� l.� .�. + 1 .,.r .�� f I _ _ .' i : ._ � .... i _. I ��� � �� � �� 0 A,LNg- ,p'.' AMOKgQk [ CLERK OT .SOARDHEOff" _ 4 S ��.LA�Nl STATE OF CALIFORNIA iJ #, STEPHEN J. SCHUSTEJ,AS€ WNER OF Tf#5 L.A $HOWN HEREON ANC,MIC VAUEY TITLE AND ESCROW COUNTY 41~L3L1 TTE CC-MAANY,AS TRUISTEE OF THE DEED TRWT PO RECf1RM S SERIAL NUMBERS X01-2, 6 74, �^ I 200fi���5�' AL1EfD 2Y?a2.��`�' FIERY STATE THAT WEARE T�CITY PER aIVS.1 �.�'CCF�ISENT S � ! . �.. THE NOTARY #, � '� `,. ARD CP SUI'ER'VISQ1� D4 HEREBY STATE THAT 4IV .: ,. . � � . �� MLS T1�E i�Np�SI��III�,��# � �>�UB�FC�►AI���R SAID NECESSARY TO PASS C PnE TO SAID LAND AND WE CONSENT' ''F PREPARATION AND 7��t U7 T � F�'�'8�t E , TA#�Ft, P RE '.�_'� � '7�v PS��A�.Y d�l�T'�3��'��R PR�i ":�'�M 'Q � a tJ S��t��e�R s :• T I 1 LL AP O IS FINA.MAP OF P; . T 17LaCl?f�LtA #CIV fTF S FINAL MAP TIL B�SIS SATIFACTQ�RY EVIDPCE T©BE T"flE PERSCN WASE NAME"1S SUBSCRIBED 70 TPIEttlTf lIN CSAAI INQ S�FB # SIAI, 1F#3`3. C t,STf FM I ` k#11 A Qt C}T M T 1�T"F t D T1-E S�W IN Fib A17 1 € 'A 3 ,. ! . / # . W: WE HEREBY OFFER F' DEDCAtTION FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES TIME F ,C�fNC�. THAT BY HIS SIONAT U ON THE WSTRUMENT`� PE1�N R`7HE "f7"Y UPON SAV OF WHICH H ACTED, T°�?��-�,��OFFERED IN �� fNER S SIAT EMENT ARE ACCEPTED 4:N F3EFlALP OF THE COUNTY OF E*WED THE INSTRUMENT: BUTT 1. GARNER LAN OUNTREN RQAA AND L.I. OBERGH CIRCLE TO BUTTE t*U N. TY IN FEE SIMPLE FOR AU ITEMS 5-7 AS fi�FF=ERW INTHE OV'NER'S STATEMENT ARE ACCEPTED ON CALF OF THE PUBLIC. pull LC P�IJRP SES. NA4rMa ITEM 8 AS CF D'Ili'THE OK RAS 3TATEII�W 13 NOT ACCEPTED AT THM TfUF_ I LOT C TQ ftU7 TE'CCUNT'Y IN ESE SIMPLE R STCfRM DfWNACE 1=A.CILITXS, CWNTY SERVICE AREA 1 +�',, ... A. _.m4m _.: 176. NOTARY PUSUC ST RL J. C USTER 4011 SPYS4AS�S ROAD, C��+Q, CA,HAS CONSENTED TO Tail;0EDICAMNS FOR COUNTY CF L UTE AUS€ A Y F d1PC�1iF TntIS AIS AI1ft PUTON NCT E THAT PURSUANT`TO C-41 AWENT • Rat BUTTE/COU T')�``�+f AU�(4�'St�A+1T710"W,,HTS OF ACWSS A O THE GARNER LAE CODE SECTM U4T7, Aft'!'OEO CA TSD PROPERTY'SI�:r Bim*R-"CC V Y . O`�'H t'� �{ r�WF�F1F`7 A !'+CrrW`LP✓f ti3� t�"''1��'4!'v�� 1,LOTA�,A�:e+�LOT Gt. ,,�� '_"'^ � �r 6 � �l� �Wi I i7�.OWNER�E'[ OF to $0005"IH INTEREST,IN THE EVENT THE LCCA.AGENCY DETERMINES THAT THE DEDICATION IS NO I4?C �E CPfiFrE15F3 EAISEMENT"Fid LOT T'8 AS SHOWN YtNN AER N 3'C BUTTE COMMIS .INItRES r L,CN ER RE UIRELT FC �E Pill UC PURPOSE'S INTENDED. 5 A VARIABLE VVDTHPU.BLIC SERVICEEASEM OTPPSPi ALONG S;TREE'rFRONTAGES OFA ALL LO A PINED IN SECTION 83Q8 CAij;;0 1�1A S TREE'T . O RILL A'Y ODS 0,EDl0A'l'Wl F0A ALL PUBLIC E. �, % I- SER{fCE PURE SES. CLERK OF E BOARD B E'EASEMENT IN L.Cf 1 S AS SHOWN MEREON, FOR FIRE PRCTE`CTr--N FACILITIES. � Rx SHIT' fi"t1SORS,E !, COUNTY OF BU v. S.L.,��T I 7• T'IL'E EASEMENTIN LOT 8 AS SWVW, HEREON, FOO STROM DRAINAGE MaUTIES• LOT B TO BUTTE COUNTY W, FEE SIMPL-PCR PUBLIC PARK PURPOSt l WE HEREBY LIES ONATE LOT Al A$A 00,fi?MdN AREA FOR TIE CQIYIM/1 CITY STREA MENT A .0 1 DO 1"IL:flEBY STATS T'ttA7`M$AM. MAF'OF PLEASANT E.ANOINS SWD1WSIQN, i,litiFJT"3 CCRA'ECT.LY E DlSf dSAt FACILFTFES, FORTH, av__P#T' `L OTS T OfROLIGH LOT'A$HALL B CQNWYeD BY REf�IT�SE�TS,�SLfR�EI�I�IACE�Y l�lE OR PIF . I( C1AECION IN FE41 AJC � ' AND IS TRUE AND 1" O T B Ir V11 FT' A, T A �.; U . Y,1QaP N, ' S PEJ�`A UMEMTT' !�E I�f1 T Ild � L� �N UN t�1,�1EC L S St�CIA IC1Y C ,, , ;_ ;, , E DOC A LAID � . S � S C1VlPl, T A;7 S: #�k//� , I � � . � ,.: � �' >fE7 ALL TffE MC�IU.ME'NTS LLr '�'l�TffE'Cf�ARRCT'ER AtND E� UPY THE POS1Tl4NS .� %p S,rA.rgffoT DEFINED BY TPIE C4�f `NACNT'3, C ,IC1.IhlS,AND IST'RCCTICIS RECORDED CCNCUIRRENTL Y fIEfVfTll . F1VECATD WITfIIN 90 bAIYS 4F MAP RLwCOfrLATICN ANIS WILL BL~SLJFFICI.EIT'TC FINABLE Tkll S.UR1fEY T`t BE _. . T'F7ACE'S. - I�fE HEREBY L3ENA �LQT T A�A COMM 4 N Af A FCF THE REP.A]A OR RE'PL,ACEMENT CSF THE .. Cf7MMUNITY SE ACE tllSf'E7SAL.FACS ITIES. L.CT 7 St-/ALL NCT BE; _�ASEQ�RO&f THE COMMON AREA QE lk 4TICN ORE °S SAE E CR FINANCE f IYTII,,A 1 /ft11 TEl w ,n: SEH :ETE,E P OV10,6€3 BY Vit, , BUST'ECCtII �' 'E1lftllfZCIEIVTA.14TfCLPART1 . .T AfBTI'E . � GS `t�i'IiEHCIGFECWIVEi�S ��.. T fTIS�, .. h4Y QF A V f`1 xOn�AT ,0: M. FJ ` Lesue W 4fC F . ASSOICA T JV AJ DET t71 NER CR S'UCCESSCII Ftp INTEREST ; LESLIE CCIcE LS i' _. NGR �a�''fi2 ,�''' ik BOO .. 7��. �� DAPS Af Pf�C�ES_. . . AT THE REOUEST LOF xKrs PRECfSION SURVEYING. $T FfF ` : SCHUIS RQGEf�tU"fiTQ V. RE5QD VT C3VIlAIEf MILT VXLEYTITLEAND ESCROW-CO. U88BY T R ' L ,:. . . ..:. SER,IA Imo. �Dd�,� d 00 �9.�9 ��+ ap ,. FEE:• , .�_. t S`WAR7 EDEL.L,, 0M-.,TY C NTY URWYQI QQ 14ER�4'�STATE T'HAT'!MASE L�t'AAINEf�7�1=IfS FINAL MAP ! STATE OF CALIFORNIA CF PKAU"N" L NFAIAI S��B�IVFS#C , UNl7 3 A,,10 kIT TEAT IPI IS SU8ST�4NTIALLY TfIE SAME AS IT Cf7-U<YTY 4F BUTTE= APfyE,4RE C1#THE TE1WTAI'I E MAICANLLAtf Y Af PR E TEt AT1C IS 7'I.SPE�7'Iw ALL PR`VIS�IIFS 4f TPI SU-$btW18-]0. MA- ACT AAt0 LOCAL OADWANG APf »:ABL, 'AT°Tf H TIME OF TE NTAI MI MAP a� , ,. A1f"Pf `AE HAaf. E:: ON Jan � B QR IMA , TRE UNDETF, f(3NED,A NOTARY U. Iii IF F�41�1fl C �� Elf CC?lblPG �t k�J1 fT AfwfLT 1At� A7'fSFfEI?1'f#>�kT`THIS�FAkP'f:�T EC ICAL LY'CUJRl7E�r PdR"S,4f ST 7�,PER$0NA�l.L. . PPE ST DIE}t.I. Si HI S1,Z IIIUCV N TO ME Ql1 PROVE ; TC ME CN TI DE BASFS CF SAS ISFAC�CRY Er 1Y1DE»NCL�T' Y E TfIE P tSCN 046 ADAMS IS SUBSCRISEb 1•a 7`fiE wTH11�1 uvSTfl IM1NT A14 ACKNt7WLtEE # ECITEe TftlAll+r1r AUTff6A 8 CAPAC&Y, W, rH 7 8''Y.fffS S1 NATURt`C TffE IN TRLUM�N`T TW PERSO>4 OR !t#E �b ENTITY UPON BEt1AtLJt 3F th!MfGf#HE ACTED, h%8 TEC.T.H, INST IT�;'MENT ST�AFiTEI I I RCE251-32 ooviy C uNry SURVEYOR fTMTRAft N E X iiJ iS 3 f 03 +1y�c PHWAhLTlA#V , INC $W0,iW$fQ1 NAI�IE 1CNATU E . NOTARY PU&IC . 66LWY OP BUTTE COMMISSION EXPIRES SITUlATEIDV SECTION 32, T. 23 N., R 1 E, M.D.M. BUTTE COUNtY, CALIFORNIA APN 047.350=013, 047-350-014, 047-350-015 717 FIFTH- STREET ORRLAltfD CALIFORlftA 95963 uta pgl.Pcs DATE SCALE FEBRUOY,2,001 1 OF 3 g00 40 6 f KEEFER ROAD KEEFER CREEK ESTATES KEEFER CREEK ESTATES,PHASE 2 PER 122 MAPS 12 PER 138�S 35 � � 314"IRON PIPE WITH TAG IS 3336"PER 100 MAPS 85 3/4"IRON PIPE WITH TAG IS 5616"PER (S 0°01,05-W4 138 MAPS 35 AND 122 MAPS 12 3FeMN PIPE PER S 00'01'83"E 18".34" `----- '1-IRON43 P IPE WITH TAG"LS 3525"PER PROJECTE f0a MAPS 86 (18 t @5�(� LOCA ON WPOG ND 1358.68' IRONTAG,�A�ACCEPTED 5 MONL�M NT PER 43 MA .'rrrrr� s�r1r�l°Iww_rt0i ..�'M4 '.01'R4!0,w�.1M►1wM 11U°II -: 4,44 - �wrr•YYiw4r �FIh Mw! .: MM IYR wiwr^tA M.liw°Ftll!R (; PIPE 522.041' 12540' 203.8 ` 143 pQ fi4 143 OCR 12.1 . _ 1 41&62' 14 -8 .- (Af RAILROAD SPIN AT INTERSECTION OF ----------------- 44 GARNER LANE AND KEEFER ROAD PER Mw t tu ` ` =--=-=====-= RECOR'DER'S SERIAL NO 200-26971 2 __= -1 ' 1�! ` `` __-=___'_=' (b SET WITNEBS CORNER N 4°I70�"E, saCR ` LOT 1-5 Lel'16 -- -=--- LOT 17" LOT to � �� �� - �9f A R rpt AORES MACRE'S 0.94 ACRES � fi47:t FROM PROPERTY CORNER LOT 13 _ • f . \ - - NO DEVELOPNOT EASE'N&O -------------- - r d ` -----_-________ _- AUGDS�AD .. ow ------------ ------- - --- S,PYSLASS ROAD � - - --- _---_-_ t -- ---_-_-__- "LOTIZ �, L.1NrBE Gni 1R' •, � �- _=====_------- ----------- � � N Ofl'4Q'G E ; +�,� '',,++ -_______ _ __ __ y WCE MI P 1:4FF V 249.94' �:� �� �, .,.. �* ♦ -------------= NOT TO SCALE - ---- _ - - O�3ACRE'S' LOT�� LCAT 21 � LOT 20 LOT 19 '�� _ _--=_=-___�` =_ __ z . LOT 1 .. r a f.14ACRES f.1+fACRES f.3JAaR4ES f.�3',ACRl S �- _ --- -=_------- --- --- MACRES WWW E i �____ ---=-------------- N 4 FAILS 0�21'SOUTH OF LINE ""• 1 - - - cv a !�Q4 - - - - ----- N 00 C0 t ! �� '.. � - t 2a9 -. 243;15 1 ., Nano N 00 001 N a Ir 1 ==-===== ' #, L�?" 4 180 GAJ' 170 8 1 -- _--_-`_'=_=__ ------ 0. - Y 8@ ACRES =_- -- _ - �. LST tQ �►'" e� LOT 29 � 1 = --- --=-_ -_ o 2� o MACRE'S t `' OmACRES �� ► 1 =-=== N 06°00'00" j N 20(0 w N --=------- 244.94' = - - E� --:H - 243.94' ua 271.3x" 1 w _------ t LOT 26 LOT 27 LOT 28 16 � -__--__-_- @FALLS 0.1 7"SOUTH, OF LINE rw f 4k9 ACRES t t 1.14ACRE$ cs ` 1 ------------ All '01 t LCT 3a 30 LOT26 r* LOT30 0,12ACRES ` ! 083ACR2E'S b f.04ACR9S N00' f E ,t + r-- -_ 18 _ _ _ _ _ ._ -..._ ' __ , 2�•3�� 1 1 � . ' l i3 . t. a ► ©°�'Q' 1 _=' ____--3 _-_ tai ---- OQ00 � _ _ f �► � L1NL'�B RGH IRLr� ��.�� W �, --------------- _ -_ LG�x 8 --nor - ,_ -_ - - - 'r `�' __ WAR/ABLE lNIDTH (FALLS I#13'SOUTH OF L111IE t.osACR s �t ==-== STOAM DRAIN 1�` - '-^-_ -F EASEMENT d e LST I °(�,W I� 339.96' LG ` L.CIT LEST 6 L.QT! LST 4 LaT g L ►T 2 w: _ 6, , �► 1.06ACRtES , ' t$SACR�ES m 0.98ACREE3 `4 0 90AGR 5 0.9DACRE3 4 9t�ACRES ti: 0.9XRAERBs �,�0,9AACRr B 04t. j Z RR 51�RKE P R ,t4a85 3 loo MATS B 5 3 8��----- .�. 1�� _ .-._...�4��- . �-043 0�- - 043; -143.a0` - 9��0'- 4� : . "1'2: ��'. _. . '` . 2�8 2� c�'�r�R a�s�cri�� roorRYaU� --- s- ....... �.N .......rrwriWrYY rfrr.r►r rW :': ii.4ariiYifiir�.+4 ..... .rix�.wu.iW.rr :....' rrrr.rr4 Oi �M� ri+r- Oi�+iY�hi� it _ .4�rWw Iw O��Yr.i.01k .. i0►... IOMi .rr.�Jr�.�'.. .._.. riraw w 1 IR2(3IyR'(PE'R�'R _ � 0 � _ 29 5 ' _ _ 43 MAPS 61 9 0o 00 04 W SZ2�00' - - PER 1920 0.R.328 1s 1.1w 0641-" GARNEA �.AN� S 00°`00'00"W 646.741 Not FOUND (&0°00100"�W 522.01(4) ^�^ N 00 00 00"E' 2213.52' . (NORTH @4@ 74 ) 4*00'aa"E 2119.0ir (N©-00'WE 2213:@07(,4} (N @000'00"E 2119.587(4) BASIS OF 8E4RINGS �11V : ATA RELINQUISHMENT OF ABUTTOR'S - RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG GARAeR LANE' AkONTAGE OF LOTS Cl D--90°00'00" R=20.00' L=31.4-2,' C12 D=24°4527" R--230,00' L=99.38' 1 THROUGH 7, LOT A,AND LOT C L C2 D=90'00'00" R-40,00' L=62.813' C13 D=45°00'00" R=200.00' L=167.08' 0 „ _ a SET 1114"IRON PIPE WfTH CAP STAMPED"LS 57'12" . C3 D= 10°fld'(70" R= 170:00' L-2067 C14 D=45 fl0`00 R-170 fld L=x,33.52' ,PH'�i���MT LANI�CN St1�C11V1�'1�1 C4 D= 10°0000" R=20000' L=34.91' C15 D=44°24'56" R=20,00' L=15.'50` 0 SET 518"RE'BAR W1 CAP STAMPED"LS 57''12" • Pill „ A SET STANDARD STREET CENTERLINE MONUMENT -�- 05 D,= 10000100" R--23000 L--40.14 C16 Or 71 1030 R=50.00' L=62.11' BA O 80 0,<r, ,fl = = O a I = O FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED IN CORNER N0TL�S SITUATE'IN THE 114 OF SECTION 32, T 23 N, R 1 E, MDM C6 D 35 0000 R--1700E7 t 1d3 85 C17 D 43 4544 R=50.00 L 38,19 THE GENTER LINE OF GARNER LANE AS E'STA'BLISHED BETWEEN = . •�.� W .. SUBDIWISION BOUNDARY MONUMENT NOS. 1 AND 4, MOR`IBED AS N 0"0000"E'IN THE BUTTE COUNTY, i ALIF'ORAM C7 D=35°00'013" R=200.00' L= 12217' C1$ D 631-338" R 5fl, L-55.78' DOCUMENT'FILED AS FkcO t7EI S�JOCUMiew N0. 2001-269,73 a (1) RECORD INFORMATION PER 100 MAPS 85 C8 D='3'45 00'00 R=2%.00 L= 14054 C19 D=88 53'459 R=50.00 L= 77'.58 C9 D4 44°58'0?" R=23:4:070` L= 180:52` C20 D= 89'55'52" R=5007 L= 78.4.8' M RECORD INFORMATION PER 122 MAPS 12 _ AND 138 MAPS 35 APN 047"-350-044 047-350-014 047-350.015 C f O D--4,4'5847' R--200,W L= 156.97`' C21 I3=20°14'33" Rls23`0.00' L=&1,2 i' C r�+ (� R'EEOFtp INFORMATION PER 43 MAPS 61 C11 L1-44'"5:8'07" !�- 17'O.I't0' L= 133.42' . (4) RECORD INFORMATION PER RECORDER'S SERIAL NO. _. . 2001-26973 �1�'�lf]`N STREET �3Rt.A1�Q, 4�ALFFQRl�IA 9,5963 ' PSE PU9'LIC SERVICE EASM01T un#3`pn2..PCs 0TE S� SHEET I.- -D'1 FEBRUARY,2001, 1" 1w 2 Of 3 14%6 6r Y71 NOTES: ALL WATER WELLS DRILLED IN AREAS OF KNOWN FLOOD HAZARDS MUST MEET THE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AS SET FORTH IN BUTTE COUNTY CODE 23B-9C. DEVELOPMENT OF LOTS 1 THROUGH IROUGH 30 MLL REQUIRE CONNECTION TO THE COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM LOT A IS TO BE HELL?IN COMMON BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A COUMUNfTY SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. wwrrrr.... w.�„r^.+rr.n++n„r!wr .._.._..n++r„«w+N,w„w.,,. . nwahrwwrrwr.,or. wr.,�wrwur e.+ran,r+.►,ww. r.,r�rrw,,.+�+ww.rr„rrr � � +�+iwl//////////1/.// ALL DOMESTIC WELLS SHALL BE LOCA TED A MINIMUM OF 5'FROM LOT SIDELINES, 50' ; F'R�}IG�,�7'IC T�tNIr�'S AND PRESS(IRE SEER t>INE'S, 1(v FROMSTORM WATER DETENTION AREAS,AND 1 W FROM THE COMMUNITY SEWAGE DISPOSAL AREA. LOT 14 LOT " LUT LOT 9T i ii /i i f���� LOT I IS A DESIGNATED COMMON AREA FOR THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF THE COMIf►C1MTY SEW GE DISPOSAL i AC4UTIE'S.A SEWAGE FALX ITY AXPANS ,�. LOT 12 ri///rr rr��r����� AGREEMENT IS RECORD UNDER RECORDER S.SERIAL 3� PROPERTY OKW08 AGREE TO BE WLt1 MD AND PARTICIPATE IN ANY FUTURE FIRE PRO TEC 77 /rirrr/rirrr//ri,� D/ CH=AREA FOR THE NEIO 0RHOOD ION PA AMTIFIED Aug LOT B ON THIS TION OF A LIGHTING AND SAI=71VIa � OR LU rLINDSERG + 1RCLL* - ri/r/r/i/r/� ir/rri//Irrir/rirr/r ;fir/ /r rr LOT 2 LETT 2 LOT 21 LUT 2 , LEST 19 rr i iri / / rrr/ /ri LOT 11 / WE LL LOCATION Wi4T&I LUT r//`�r%��friir/�rirr�r/r�/rri ri/rrr F, ,SONE"A'FUER FLOOD INSURANCE RA TE MAP ,007CO3204, DATED€1-20-2000 TI TANK FREE ///ter r/rir // /ii rrr ii rir/ /i/r ri/rr {TYPICAL} LOT 24 ii//���i/r/rri/r/i/rr✓i///ri//ir/i'/irii ii//rrr ir/rr/rii r/r/r/moi '''� 7E! iiiii rrr / / / rir/ r/rr rirr rrii/ //rirr/r/rim LOT 10 LCAT 29 � //rr ri/ rrr rir /ir rirr rr// rirrrr r /ii /iiiir /iii r // / // /✓ /i ri rir/ rii /ri /i r/ ri• ri / /i / //i rir/ rirrr) ri///r rirrrr/rirr/ii/rrrrrr ri/ri .rii rri ri i ; � /�i//✓it i/ / rrr /i, /i/ /i/r r�/r i riri�r i i i LOT 26 LOT 27 LOQ'28 i�i i i/i/'` r//rrr rrrr/rir rrrri /rte rir)/r//iirr/ri r'ri '//r rri i 1- T`S LOT 2' L.L?T 3Q i i r i r i iii //i rirr/r�rirrr/�rirrr r/iirr/r /ir rirr/i rr';iii i • / / rir /.� // /// r/ / / r / / / i / / / �`` rrr/rir r r/ii rrrr r///i rii ri i i i/i r i r i/i r .. •C r// irir/i //rir rr/irr iii iii / r / / r/ ✓ / / r INL7BERG CIRC © .. /i// // rrr// rrrri r/rir rirr ri/i/i ri riri Vii'iiia/ .. ._ HCR.. - LOF$ L,© 1L T` / / / / / rrrr //r //i/ii✓/// //! / S _E. AGE lrll r / / / I /i/ii riririrrr/i/i/r/rr ri r /r r / DISPOSALLdT�' LOTS bT S LOT 4 LOTS LaT 2 L T 1 i�/�/i i r/i rrii/ii/ii�//i/i/i//////rirrr/rrriirri✓ri i EAST AITEA WELLa tS DOTE 5) SEE'NOT / I W S TORM WATER 150'SEW, .E 131SPES FRE SETBACK - - • O FACILfTY EI8ACI1' rr-w—rrr„r. +r.rrwarr r►o- - ... rrrwwrrrr.rrrw, _ GARNER LANE THIS SHEET SHOWS ADDITIOAX INP6 R94TION THAT IS &LANDSCAPED BERM/SUFFER ALONG GARNER LANE FRONTAGE OF LOTS I RELAVANT TO PHEASANT LANDING SUBDIVISION, UNIT 3 AND THROUGH 7 ANIS LOT A. THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION IS RESPONSOR 13 FOR IN 1fWSIVIA77O IL PURPOSES ONLY€EXRIBING FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING CAS OF THE DATE OF FILWO AND IS MOT tN-7a W TO AFFECT RECORD Ti7'L. T INFO MAVON IN ADD'I'TION T-0 THAT SHOWN X59"IS BEING PEC000. `D CONCURRENTLY UNWR RE00IRMIS SEAM NO.2.A-#A D A � EfgAUNT LAMM MOMMN SITUATE IN TIME ME 114 OF SECTION 32, T 23 N, R 1 E, MITI BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNfA v M.-TOOo APN 047-3 034 047-350-014 047450415 I . 717 FAFTH, STREET OPLAAA CAUF RNIA 95963 ltS- a4 TZ SCALE SHEET FEBRUARY,2001 f"--15G►' 3 OF 3 Wow 3 i i REVISIONS 7BYJ wl co ; � C'7 CD V1 V w I -- � I O I W 2 4 q�'y11 1 /4 �. qOd � 1 I I I � I I i l 1 I I ; I 1 I i r I I 1 I 1 I I II 1 I Q U.. OL II I I If 10, f I x r1tl II QtV 11 I I 1 0 '30 I It oN II II I 1 r pQ o� N 6 m m m w r.. ry ,moi I 1 I z om 55' I m ►nmp � rrrym � 0 � Oo w om Lu V- f I f U- U- U- ' w ° II M _ to T I tom- � "1 �= .,,� I 1 � �• ' I p � r I I �- /41 II II �� W ° < < 0000000 J � .. X 0 � �� �� _ - -_ -_ _- � I ° � v o00000o O °m i�� z ca < '!' (�, ry i Q , , ( Q u� \9 � L IL L IL Q IL IL tD O LL 0 II I I O II 1 I I , ( LL. z 11 I , I ❑ , �77 w O i...l II I I Z O r�.I I, 1. 11 II � d II i I t►.r -VIF" II II II 1 I I �+ yam/' /A W �� II p�I 11 d h ItL—r-,� I I W 11 II , 1 w it II I I I I i I I I 11 11 I I ' I f I n II II II I i 11 11 I I I , If 7374 SQ.FT. 102, 1 7/ 16 LIvABLE w , m N }tu I x I I j 1 685 SQ.FT. I I Q I GARAGE 847 SQ.FT. I I PATIO I 1 lz t I I 1 1 24q' 11 1 /2 -90d SCALE: DATE: 2 -7 "1' 11 1 /2 I PAGE I 0 1 OF 13 Pi TL NQ