Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAR 99-01_PLANNING 12, NII � IYR � m � lu� l � VIUV� � II � � IV - SEPARATOR SHEET ,,,, „o,ER„U„,aEa Ur4R 99 - 01 a PROJECT SUMMARY SHEE�� FILE>#:_VAR 99-01 PROJECT TYPE: Variance r APPLICANT: Ray&Margrete Court ADDRESS: 333 Buckingham Rd.#2,Pacifica,CA 94044 OWNER: Same ADDRESS: REPRESENTATIVE: Smith Construction ADDRESS:_ 11 Dawn Court,Oroville,CA 95965 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Variance to enclose a pre-existing deck that is located 5 feet into a 10 foot building setback PROPERTY ZONED: AR-1 LOCATED: on the southwest corner of Lamirada Ave.and Short Ave.,at 5 Short Ave.,Oroville AP#: 069-450-028 TOWN/AREA:_ _ Oroville GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Agricultural Residental 1. Application complete: August 28, 1998 Amount: $1048.00 Receipt#: 16610 2. Comments sent to: EH,LAECO,DEV,SERV.,ASSESSOR,PW,AG.COMM:,CDF,PG&E,-CHAMBERS VIACOM CABLE,PACIFIC BELL , 3. Comments received from: 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 6. Assigned To:Daniel Breedon 7. Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No: Categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Subject to Fish&Game: Environmental Impact Report Gen.Rule Ex.-CEQA#15061.(bx3) Other 8. Staff Report: Project Video: 9. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: 10. Publication Notice Written: Display Ad Prepared: 11. Notices Mailed: // C/_ / Number of Notices: 12. Newspaper Publication Date: �� �-� `j v ( n I C P G B 13. Planning Commission Hearing(s):_ d- 5' P Action taken: Special Conditions: t 9 Commission Resolution No. 14. Board of Supervisors'Hearing(s):. 1 Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: 15. Type Use Permit/Send for signature: 16. N.O.E./N.O.D./APPENDIX G: Fish&Game Fees Paid: Yes No 17. Send validated Use Permit: � DEC 2 2 1998 ; 18. Assessor's Memo: DEC 2 2 1998 19. Copy of Use Permit/Variance to Planning Technician: D EC 2 2 1998 Ray and Margrete Court - (Item determined to be categorically exempt from environmental review) Variance to allow the construction of a sun room and perimeter foundation, 5 ft. into the required 10 ft. side(southwest)property line setback on property zoned AR-1 (Agricultural Residential - 1 acre parcels) located on the southwest corner of La Mirada Avenue and Short Avenue, at 5 Short Avenue, identified as AP 069-450-028, Oroville. (VAR 99-01) (DB) A video of the site was shown. Mr. Breedon summarized the staff report. The hearing was opened to the public. Stephen Smith, representing the applicants, said that the enclosed deck with cement siding would be an improvement in fire safety, and an agreement has been signed with CDF regarding the cement siding. There was a discussion regarding the location of the sliding door access to the deck and the location of the septic tank. The hearing was closed. It was moved by Commissioner Mooney, seconded by Commissioner Cage, and carried unanimously for approval of the Variance for Ray and Margrete Court,VAR 99-01, pursuant to the findings and conditions of the Agenda Report dated November 25, 1998.. FINDINGS Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. This proposal has been determined to be Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Specifically, Section 15305(a) -Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations, Class 5, of the CEQA Guidelines exempts variances to set backs not resulting in the creation of any new parcel. Section 2: Variance Findings. A. This Variance may be granted because special circumstances applicable to the property exist, including size,-shape, topography, location or'surroundings, and the strict application of the setback ordinance would deprive the property owner of privileges enjoyed by other property owners, and would not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations placed'upon other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification, as supported by the following facts: 1: The existing dwelling and attached deck was legally approved at a 5 ft. setback applicable at the time. 2. The zoning was changed in 1984 which imposed a 10 ft. setback, causing the existing improvements to become non-conforming. ■BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ■NOVEMBER 25, 1998o 3.' The corner location,narrow lot design, and the further encumbrance of the property by the radius of La Mirada Ave. combine to eliminate feasible alternatives for the proposal. 4. The dwelling's location within the existing setback, and proximity of the septic system adjacent to the existing deck, eliminate alternative usable areas for development within the rear yard area of the building site. 5. The physical arrangement of improvements on the property took place in accordance with the requirements applicable at the time. This arrangement now limits the acceptable choices for a sun room to the subject proposal, due to findings 3 and 4 above. Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this report, move to approve *ti Variance 99-01, for Ray&Margrete Court, for development of the sun room and perimeter foundation on the existing deck 5 ft. into the required 10 ft. side yard setback. Approval shall be subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "A" SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Division: 1. The variance is approved for the development of the sun room and perimeter foundation on the existing deck to encroach 5 ft into the south west side yard setback, in accordance with the application and plot plan as-submitted. Butte County Fire Department: 2. Exterior siding of sun room shall employ the use of fire resistant siding such as hardi board/plank. 3. Eves of sun room shall be enclosed. - - ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ■NOVEMBER 25, 1998m w There was a discussion regarding the traffic on the Upper Ridge Commissioner Cage thought that projects should be considered on a case by case basis. She noted the entire ridge is a high fire hazard area. Commissioner Leland thought some roads might have greater risks than others. Mr. Parilo said the County is working with the Town of Paradise on a Skyway improvement plan, and most of the immediate concerns are for improvement of the main intersections. Commissioner Nelson said the entire road should be considered rather than one lot at a time. Mr. Parilo said BCAG completed a study on traffic on the Upper Ridge about two years ago which has not been presented to the Town of Paradise or the Board of Supervisors. County and Town staff have been trying to identify projects which could provide some relief. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ■NOVEMBER 25, 1998m BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT - November 25, 1998 Applicant: Ray&Margrete Court Location: Southwest corner of La Mirada Ave. and Short Ave., File#: VAR 99-01 at 5 Short Ave., Oroville Request: Variance Parcel Size: 0.47 acres G.P.: Agricultural Residential Zoning: AR-I (Agricultural Residential Applicable Regulations: Section 24-50 et. - 1 acre) seq. Butte County Code, -Application for Variance. APN: 069-450-028 SUMMARY: Staff is recommending approval of a variance with special conditions and findings. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests approval of a variance to allow for the construction of a sun room, 5 ft. into the required 10 ft. side (southwest) property line setback. The construction of the sun room will involve enclosing an existing 448 sq. ft. deck and installing a new foundation around its perimeter. The sun room enclosure will be 12 ft. 6 inch. high. The proposed sun room will allow for all-weather, handicap accessible use of an existing built-in spa, located on the deck. SETTING: The property is developed with a single family dwelling and septic system. The parcel is 0.41 acres in size, level,with access provided by Short Ave. One single family dwelling is located adjacent to the south. Short Ave. and La Mirada Ave are adjacent to the north and east. A second single family dwelling with swimming pool is developed to the southwest, adjacent to the location of the variance. CEQA ISSUES: This proposal has been determined to be Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Specifically, Section 15305(a) - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations, Class 5, of the CEQA Guidelines, exempts variances to setbacks not resulting in the creation of any new parcel. ANALYSIS In order to approve a variance, the Planning Commission must establish that special circumstances are applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location and surroundings that 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Page 1 ■ cause a variance to County code to be necessary. Additionally, the variance must not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated. The size, shape, location and surroundings of the Court property contribute to special circumstances that allow findings to be made to support a variance to County code. The development of a sun room enclosing an existing deck is consistent with the use of residential rear yards, and would not constitute a special privilege not enjoyed by other similar properties. The following sections examine the specific factors allowing for this variance. Development History The dwelling and deck are currently nonconforming to the side setback. The dwelling and deck were approved under appropriate building permits in the 1960's. The zoning at that time allowed for a 5 ft. setback. This zoning was changed in 1984, imposing a 10 ft. setback. The development of improvements on the property took place in accordance with the requirements applicable at the time. The fact that these improvements are nonconforming does not, in itself, constitute a special circumstance upon which the Planning Commission can base an approval. However, the current location of these improvements are contributing factors that limit alternatives for development. Parcel Configuration The Court dwelling is situated on a narrow, corner lot that is further encumbered by the radius of La Mirada Ave.,which makes a 110-degree turn at this location. The property is also developed with a septic system. The location of the septic system, and its replacement area, and the setbacks applicable to both sides of the corner, also limit alternatives for development. The current physical arrangement of the dwelling, deck and the septic system appears to have been chosen due to these factors, and provides the most logical design to allow for a private, rear yard area. . Alternatives The proposed sun room cannot be located any further east from the southwest side property line setback due to the presence of the septic system and dwelling. Development of the sun room on the west side of the dwelling is an alternative,however, this location is already occupied by an attached carport. The side yard setback also presents the same problem at this location, and this site would also require a variance. Development on the dwelling's east side may be feasible,however,this site cannot be characterized as a rear yard given its close proximity to La Mirada Ave. This location may also present a safety hazard, according to the applicant. Conclusion The special circumstances noted in the previous sections allow for the findings necessary to grant this variance and indicate that the adjustment authorized will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Page 2 0 Conditions ! The Butte County Fire Department indicated that the proposed sun room be improved with fire resistant siding and that the eves be enclosed to increase fire safety. This is a condition of the Variance. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission make the findings and take'the action listed below to approve Variance 99-01, for Ray & Margrete Court, subject to the special conditions listed in Exhibit "A". FINDINGS Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. This proposal has been determined to be Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Specifically, Section 15305(a) -Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations, Class 5, of the CEQA Guidelines exempts variances to set backs not resulting in the creation of any new parcel. Section 2: Variance Findings. A. This Variance may be granted because special circumstances applicable to the property exist, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, and the strict application of the setback ordinance would deprive the property owner of privileges enjoyed by other property owners, and would not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification,as supported by the following facts: 1. The existing dwelling and attached deck was legally approved at a 5 ft. setback applicable at the time. 2. The zoning was changed in 1984 which imposed a 10 ft. setback,causing the existing improvements to become non-conforming. 3. The corner location, narrow lot design, and the further encumbrance of the property by the radius of La Mirada Ave. combine to eliminate feasible alternatives for the proposal. 4. The dwelling's location within the existing setback, and proximity of the septic system adjacent to the existing deck, eliminate alternative usable areas for development within the rear yard area of the building site. 5. The physical arrangement of improvements on the property took place in accordance with the requirements applicable at the time. This arrangement now limits the acceptable choices for a sun room to the subject proposal, due to findings 3 and 4 above. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Page 3 0 0 • Section 3: Action. I A. Subject to the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this report, move to approve Variance 99-01, for Ray & Margrete Court, for development of the sun room and perimeter foundation on the existing deck 5 ft. into the required 10 ft. side yard setback. Approval shall be subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "A" Attachments: Exhibit map Smith letter j i ■ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Page 4 ■ EXHIBIT A VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE VAR 99-01 VARIANCE NO. 069-450-028 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below Ray&Margrete Court is hereby granted a Variance for development of the sun room and perimeter foundation on the existing deck 5 ft. into the required 10 ft. side yard setback. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Division: 1. The variance is approved for the development of the sun room and perimeter foundation on the existing deck to encroach 5 ft into the south west side yard setback, in accordance with the application and plot plan as submitted. Butte County Fire Department: 2. Exterior siding of sun room shall employ the use of fire resistant siding such as hardi board/plank. 3. Eves of sun room shall be enclosed. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this variance, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this variance does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Chairman Butte County Planning Commission CC: Land Development, Building Division, Health Department, Department of Forestry 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Page 5 0 SMITH CONSTRUCTION 11 DAWN COURT-OROVILLE, CA 95965-(530)533-7595-FAX: (530)534-7371 -LICENSE#422969 TOLL FREE: (800)748-9546 Planning Division 3ii -Our most Important job is yours' 0 C T 1 61998 Oroviii®,caulomia Butte County Planning Division 10/15/198 Dept.of Developmental Service 7 County Center Drive Oroville Ca..95965-3397 Attn. Daniel C. Breedon Subject: Proposed Variance (VAR-99-01) Ray &Margret Court property 5 Short Ave. Oroville Dear Mr. Breedon, I writing you,on behalf of the applicants Ray and Margaret Court, in response to your letter dated Oct. 5, 1998 detailing staffs position. I would ask that you and your staff please consider the following additional information in support of our request for an approval of the variance.We feel the following information establishes that special circumstances,with respect to the property and project,are applicable, including size,shape,topography, location and surroundings,and do cause a variance to county code to be an appropriate finding. 1. SIZE: The current Zone,AR-1,was placed on the property in 1984 creating the 10 ft. setback. The former zone was A-2 allowing the 5 ft. setback of the existing permitted deck. A more appropriate zone should have been AR-.5 allowing a 5 ft. setback. This property is only .41 acres and except for a couple other lots, it is surrounded by much larger parcels. If this parcel was larger,say an acre, it would give the owners the flexibility of relocating the proposed structure to a different location. 2. SHAPE- The property is a long narrow lot further restricting any alternative sites for the proposed project. 3. LOCATION: The hot tub and deck,both installed with all appropriate permits, became a non-conforming use due to the rezoning in 1984. The sun room needs to be attached to the house, easily accessible to the living areas. Mr. Court is elderly and handicapped and his medical condition requires daily use of the hot tub. Enclosing it and attaching it to the house is necessary for safe,all weather, handicap accessible, use. Mrs. Court also suffers from arthritis and uses the Jacuzzi daily for relief. The deck or enclosed sun room can't be moved to the east five more feet because it would then encroach on the location of the septic tank and leach field. Detaching it from the house,although not a physically, medically acceptable alternative,depending on location,could interfere witti the 100%leach field reserve area. Changing the location of the sun room/Jacuzzi room to the East side or North side of the house would mean locating it in a very unsafe location fronting a dangerous curve on La Mirada. Just a few weeks ago a young girl lost control of her car in that curve and slammed into 5 large brick pilasters located along the curve on the Courts property causing over$2000.00 in damage to the Courts brick and wood fence. The brick pilasters were put on that curve to stop cars who missed the curve from driving into the house. Based on the above information we find no alternative locations for the proposed project. Approval of the variance will not adversely affect the neighbor to the West. Her property, a similar sized lot, is fully developed with a pool built in her back yard along their common property line. Since a majority of the properties in the area are greater than 1 acre this case is not the norm. Other properties aren't saddled with the same restrictions this property has because, most of the other lots are much larger. We hope this sheds more positive light on this application. Please call me if you need any further clarification. Sincerely, even D. Smith Owner, Smith Construction a ,nco +�Poq yas N C20/ 50�Org6 ,,t � as-- t � � S � � o V�4-j � A3 `k) c� - Lk 0 �f' s 1 � � � � COURT Riehter Ridge Road ----- AR-1 -- Project Location a A-R i Ii R-1 4 o�ya Cr e A enue -...." -- ---- -- -- - - AR-5 f JAI i ,w,LLQQF�1F8- -- --- - ---- -------- ----------- BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMSSION Applicant: Ray&Margrete Court Owner: Same Hearing Date: November 25, 1998 @ 9:00 a.m. Existing Zone: AR-1 (Agriculftnul Residential, 1 ac.min.) N Request: Variance to enclose a pre-existing deck that is located 5 feet into a 10 foot building setback. No Scale Assessor Parcel No: 069-450-028 FIle: 99-01 DEPARTMEOf OF DEVELOPMEAR7 SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Aeent information to he provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME( If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: Smith Construction 069-450-028 ADDRESS: CITY.STATE&ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER (FOR OFFICE USE) 11 Dawn Court Oroville, Ca. 95965 Y, q _p NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT(If any TELEPHONE 98001201 (530 ) 533-7595 LOCATION OF PROJECT(Major cross streets and Address, if any) 5 Short Ave. Oroville Ca. 95965 GENERAL IIYF UIRRMATION RE ED O OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE Ray & Margrete Court ( 650) ADDRESS: CITY.STATE&ZIP CODE. 333 Buckingham Rd. #2 Pacifica, Ca. 94044 ZONE GENERAL.PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE(m Square Feet or Acres) l-R Residential ACGS FXWMG STRUCTURES(in Square Fea) PROPOSED STRUCTURES(in Sgcate Feet) 448 sq. ft. deck w/spa ' :•: �;` 448 sq. ft. enclosed deck w/s a :`> (Check One) (Check One) �'.:^Y y ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED M PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER [R PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER - P TION REQUESTED AP LICA .... .... ... . ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ REZONE ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ USE PERMIT ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ® VARIANCE [3 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ MINOR VARIANCE ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ OTHER SC Q R OJECT DE RIP'TI N P FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT(Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division.describe the number and size of parcels.) There to the house. The deck with its 5 ' side yard set back was built with a ermit. Now owners want to put up a perimeter foundation around existitting deck and enclose deck to create a sunroom. Deck size or configuration -will not changej?janninclDivosion 91 -AAA OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF TI AB PROPERTY. FURTHER I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILL;G OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY ThIAT ALL OF THE AB I I AND ACCURATE (If an agent is to be authorized,exavte an affidavit of authorization an t with this Plic n.) DATE: �i� —��'j SIGNATURE: AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; Smith Construction (530 ) 533-7595 Print Name ofAgent and Phone Nuriaber .11 *Dawn Court Oroville,. Ca.. 95965 ?&fling Address is hereby authorized to process this application for Ray & Mar Q eto Cour on my property, identified as Butte County Assessors Parcel Number 069-450-028 This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document (s)relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Ray Court MargFet,6 Court Print N Print Name s' Si cure Architect and/or Engineer: GDA Engineerin 9 Ken Lenhardt (530 )533-2068 Print Name of ArchitecvEngiaeer and Phone Number 220 Grand Ave. Oroville, Ca. 95965 Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date received: 'b 1121Z8__ Total amount received: v`- AP Number(s) NI N Legal Description Owners Authorization -.v-Zoning requirements ✓Project Description ✓ Copies of plot plan- NoA- ;occi��y Mk5-k kel Taken bye Receipt No. (cv(P io E.H. L 55• do LD _t So.oo Ply oo.oo FD q3.octi Payment of the currently required'Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this.application is $ as of Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer"." Submittal Requirements - Variance To be completed by Applicant (attach additional sheets if necessary): 1. The following exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property in question which do not apply generally to other property under identical zoning classification: Existing deck attached to house, was built with appropriate permits. It is constructed 5ft. from side yard property line. Owner wants to construct roof over existing deck, but new regulations do not permit building unless 10ft. from property line. 2. The granting of the Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights is supported by the following: To provide a shaded, protected room on South West side of home for jacuzzi . This will reduce energy to heat home in winter and cool home in summer. Construction ot a perimeter tounciati.on under existing raised deck and the siding to be installed on the improvement will substantially reduce the fire hazar that currently exists with the raised wood deck. 3. The granting of the Variance will not adversely affect the neighborhood or be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or adversely affect property improvements in the neighborhood and zone in which the property is located in that: 1 . It is an improvement to an existing structure. i, 2 . It does not .block the neighbors view. 3 . The only neighbor to the S.W. will have more privacy when existtriq deck ±5 mictused. 4 . The elimination of the existing fire hazard (raised wood deck) K:VormMsubmitallvarianceIrm revised 422/96 BKH is a benefit the neighboring house. Planning®►vision AUG 2 81999 �rovilt®,�atifomia Butte County Department of Development Services-Planning Division 0 3 COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed- lslala,6 _ General Information: MM 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or project sponsor�zay & Marclr�eti Court @ 333 Buckingham Way Pacifica . ria 94044 2. Address of project: 5 Short Ave, Orovi 11 e 0 Ca A 5 gj 5 Assessor's Parcel Number: 069-450-028 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Smith Construction 11 Dawn rn„rt , 95965 (530 ) 533-7595 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project,including those required by city, regional,state and federal agencies: Building Permit from Butte County 5. Existing general plan designation: A!�N Q4,-;k 6. Existing zoning district: Q(Z- I 7. How island currently used? Single Family Resi rlenH.A 1 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Enclose existing Deck attached to house to create a sunroom. Project Description: 9. Site size: aq_`I AC-9-F.5. (Acres/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces:Full size: 4 Compact: 2 Total: 6 11. Plans attached Yes YeS No 12. Proposed development schedule Project to be substantially Complete 3 weeks after all permits i ssrnari 13. Associated projects None 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development N/A Planning,Divisiot, A u d 2 d 1998 Oroville.Cilifomia 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division ❑ 1 Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type,whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented,square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits,state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit . _. 'fie, �, ,�,.e. i`,t h��;+ `` A °r Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes(attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. _ X 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential X areas or public lands or roads. X 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. X 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. X 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. 25. Change in bay, lake, river,stream or ground water quality X or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels X in the vicinity. X 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, X such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. _ 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services X (police, fire,water,sewage, etc. including special districts). _ 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption X (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). _ — X 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 2 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project,including information on topography,soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties,including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical,or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.),intensity of land use(one-family, apartment houses,shops,department stores, etc.), and scale of development(height, frontage,set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability,and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signa :Z, K:\FORMSIENV-INFO 0 Butte county Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 3 9 (&It SMITH CONSTRUCTION 11 DAWN COURT•OROVILLE, CA 95965•(530)533-7595•FAX: (530)534-7371 •LICENSE#422969 TOLL FREE: (800)748-9546 "Our most important Job Is yours' r ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 32. The project site is as follows: A 448 sq.ft.deck with spa attached to single family residential home. Natural grade, good compaction. Lawn area at edge of deck extending to boundary lines. No historical, cultural or scenic aspects known. 33. Surrounding properties as follows: Single family home on West side of project site. Single family home on South side of project site. Road on North side of project site. Road on East side of Project site. Project site: Single family residence. Proposed roof over existing deck would be 12'-6"high at its highest point-West side wall will be 5'from property line. Planning Division AUG Z 81998 Oroviile California 0 SMITH CONSTRUCTION 11 DAWN COURT•OROVILLE, CA 95965•(530)533-7595•FAX: (530)534-7371 •LICENSE#422969 TOLL FREE: (800)748-9546 "Our most important job is yours' i Variance Application Job: Court Owner: Ray and Margaret Court EXHIBIT "A" There is an existing 448 sq.ft. raised wooden deck with a hot tub attached to the house. The deck was constructed with all appropriate permits. Now the owners wish to put up a perimeter foundation around this existing deck and then enclose it to create a room for the Jacuzzi. The variance is necessitated due to a recent change in the set back requirements. At the time the deck was constructed the set back of 5'from the property line was in force. With the change of the set back to 10', which is the current regulation, the existing deck and any improvements to it, become a nonconforming use. The enclosure of the deck will not change the size or configuration of the.existing, permitted deck. The enclosure of the deck, and resulting perimeter foundation of the deck, will significantly reduce the existing fire danger. The enclosure of the deck will also afford more privacy to the only neighbor to the South West. It is not economically feasible to move the deck over 5' or eliminate 5' of the deck without eliminating-access to the sunroom from the family room. Moving the deck over 5' will not be benefit or mitigationto the only nearby neighbor to the South West. Planning Division AUG 2 8 1999 Orovills,California. J®111011'®IIA4ojo Z one d ..-fib -•��.,��„ � -ro��,,�%, a rp r-w� v '� - ' � ►tip �u� � � b l 09606 dJ 3-11"11 AOyO- 99696 dJ 3Tl I AO"0 3Ad 180HS iE 3Ad 18OHS E2 S331sn%ji not i:BdW 3 NHOf. S3NOL 1Sf181 A�34!d3 S3N0� . 1d:� '1 dN3M08 SIAd81 Jd :snidiS 000L+:[I 0?iSh 690:1 :"13 Jd :S011d1S }f%k 210 0 S j7 694%1 �!3 99656 dJ 3-1-116080 9966 d'J 37,-IIA080 l 3Ad VGV81 W VI 062 3Ad VMJ I W d-1 002 3f1S '3 NtiQ �J I N i d NHSf IS `3 J 1d3s30S NV13H6 j Jd Sf11d1S 000620 094769u1 �3 I j� Jd :Sf11diS 0030 LOO 0 947 690 :13 99656 dJ 3JIIA080 99696 VO 31JIAOK 3Ad 180FiS 02 3Ad dQdBI W d1 96T 1 SIyOQ 231N32yd3 T di.1-3801 I d 3N39 HOIADE Jd S(11d1S 000 L20 0%SS�i 6903 l3 Jd :Sf11diS 004%003 90 0 0947 6903 :13 99696 dJ 3_JIA080 99696 dJ 3JJIA080 3Ad 180HS 9T 3Ad V(I"I W VI 06T d dQfld e hJN319 ��IH 3 NdAI SWd1711M 3 Jd o S(11diS 000%1 9203 0%19t 6903 :13 Jd �Sflidl5' 000 90%743 SSS*i 690 �J3 99656 dJ 3-JI I A080 � 99656 dJ 3J i I r�080 � 3Ad dQdBI W VI 0.%08 i 3nN3Ad ANS 6i N I QO NMdHS Z3I M3'13I NdQ Jd13 d I8d:1 139dJH3SJHOM Jd e Sf11diS 0%70%703 5203 S 947 690 :-13 Jd °Sf41d1S 000470009t 690%1 �?3 47i7O+i6 V3d3131 Jd.� j 99656 dJ 3JJIA08O 3Ad 180HS Si2# Qd08 b1dH9NI i3na EEE - 31smi 3 138d98dW e QNOWAV8 18;10) 1SI181 9NIAIl A-iiwd3 18(103 W dWJ3Hl N I 9N36V3MS I Jd ;snidiS 000 820 O9+7 6903 :-13 Jd Sf11diS 60303 +7203 09+7 690 l3 I800-99656 dJ 3J1IA080 18019 x 0 a 0 d 3 dJ I N063A .2 ,y_r 9 Ad8 V8330WIV Jd o S(11diS .0003 0203 0947 690 13 i - � I o`er' L ho LZ 0 -�-�� dmc 710 OID ,E . w ` � � A i � >.. `� j i I r I. �' a :fir, ✓ -- � ��_ i �� ; !, i �i. � �' � 7 4 � I _ ..a, � -y � i • -� � •. ., � - .. I � � y f i / , �� . � +- i _ � 1 _ I � ''', . � a � � � i _ i .1 APPENDIX A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: _ Office of Planning and Research FROM: Butte County Planning Division 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 7 County Center Drive Sacramento, CA 95814 Oroville, CA 95965 X County Clerk CountyButte 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 DEC, 1 r 1998 Project Title: VA 9R mi, Variance CA DAeun®Co.Clerk Assessor's Parcel No.: 069-450-028 B Deputy Applicant: Ray& Margrete Court,333 Buckingham Rd. #2, Pacifica, CA 94044 Project Location-Specific: on the southwest corner of Lamirada Ave. and Short Ave., at 5 Short Ave. Project Location-City: Oroville Project Location-County: Butte Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: Variance to enclose a pre-existing deck that is located 5 feet into a 10 foot building setback Name of Person or Agency Approving Project: Butte County Planning Commission Exempt Status: (Check(One) Ministerial (Sec. 15073) Declared Emergency (Sec. 15071(a)) Emergency Project(Sec. 15071 (b)and (c)) .X Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: 15305 (a) Reasons why project is exempt: Minor lot line adjustments, side yard, and set back variances not resulting in the creation of any new parcels Contact Person: Daniel Breedon Telephone: (530) 538-7601 If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Date Received For Filing: ignature, Rody Wilson Principal Planner j:linda\noe.nod\noe.wpd I � •":.Ri � ��e�s111Vf,�` :.r .:fi�i4a- "1• "i .r . J"` a4. •��"a 1 DECLARATION OF FEES DUE (California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Ray & Margrete Court 333 Buckingham Rd. #2 Pacifica, CA 94044 (530) 533-7595 FILING NO. CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION (X) A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee ( ) B. De Minimus Impact- Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION-FEE REQUIRED ( ) A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee ( ) B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. O OTHER(Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT/NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). #16847 2. ( ) NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: Randy Wilson Title: Principal Planner Lead Agency: Butte County Department of Development Services Date: December 10, 1998 TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. _•'i��•' - ��4-�,sus �•K Sl ti' � j',��r � . arc` :i �4•,�. .'.,'c= .,.(,. .I .i: :>'y; 'ri."r �yv ';;`if ::ti:i e� ,ty;::15. }1 �t:Y.. `i'r' •Y :'j 'r' -S'.li,.v.`•i"•:.:,:�r'f �1': :•'�'•. �Lt�� .Y• T,r. .''a` 5i YS,L. ! 4 %.• ��1:,''..rvjS.'''. �Ij:, :;a• _r. See:e :r :_ff'.•t.r. py`r r� p a,�.l"i^.i i.. ,k ,.r .vt'- d. �"i,. (t.;� ''tS�M1.�`:1�, S; •�'• v� „�i rt,.sk•` •'�• :,��' •�} Y.- �ri. 5 >.a,: :i �r^Y;t...r'I ..7F.+._ ;'i:�'.` :v-. t.�.e..E: 5�' va IL v. �-n P `'�`. -� ys'-..• F: _ ,. -a a•' a r:,,. <^=fix a .:s� - :r _,�i Yti �r'i�ix�1+� ;��.,, .�• w <cY f �a�.:z•.r3 r :'�"�+ � r Y� .v t=: .{.. .�2.: :'e �:,r.o :{ er.• ,;AS' ..r.(•'t'r.; r.�.;';�'. •�.=S; $ �::s . ,*��a (Itis.'. ''r - ,�•^/, �/-•]� :'ix 1* „SAt`T ajkh�,�Yi: 1F;•Ua✓M1rL e'r. ��)V, r. r ., �'�y y,��,,:�14'<".iD:i•..d \ r�: _ :z Tin, - .a 1,�:••:.� .,.a tr 'C. :'I� �! � •t.n �t �X"'.. -oafl I)LI�•A�'��i'�.: �i '�'+- .�i Mli �• $ f/"akF M` { qua y .. .. .. a ..::r:_-k:-..��c,.�'�:::.�Y+:.�..�ri t:i_:'.1d>:,r>Lo+h.+o�':a:.ii-:a3u�;�:�k:.::�'•..;.5!`»'. .;v:S.v_.,_ :»;.:,s���:'�,�s'::::.:::.... �: •...i..,: ��,.k: r. _•A�.::cA:.:.',l�• DATE RECEIPT TOTAL w�PUBLIC LAPCO Vail .- VARIANCES PUBLIC ZONING ENV OTHER APPLICANT �.RECEIVED FROM NO. RECEIVED WORKS PERMITS DOCUMENTS HEALTH RECEIPT 16847 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING ISSUE er 4�_ an� �1 qo/ so ho i I All i bsz` v� � S . o - d Udo . o � Vicinity Map Pro ect Location to Cl�Avon ........... .......... VAR 99-01 APN 069-450-028 COURT NJ Pjehte A M Ae 10 PF BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Applicant: Ray&Magrete Court # -- I Hearing Date: November25, 1998 @ 9:00 aml5r,1711 Request: Variance to enclose a pre-existing deck that is located 5 feet into a 10 foot building setback. Assessor Parcel No: 069-450-028 y_ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CONMUSSION AGENDA REPORT - November 25, 1998 Applicant: . Ray&Margrete Court Location: Southwest corner of La Mirada Ave. and Short Ave., File#: VAR 99-01. at 5 Short Ave., Oroville Request: Variance Parcel Size: 0.47 acres G.P.: Agricultural Residential Zoning: AR-1 (Agricultural Residential Applicable Regulations: Section 24-50 et. - 1 acre) seq. Butte County Code, -Application for Variance. APN: 069-450-028 ry�h} SUMMARY: Staff is recommending approval of a variance with special.conditions and findings. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests approval of a variance to allow for the construction of a sun room, 5 ft. into the required 10 ft. side(southwest)property line setback. The construction of the sun room will involve enclosing an existing 448 sq. ft. deck and installing a new foundation around its perimeter. The sun room enclosure will be 12 ft. 6 inch. high. The proposed sun room will allow for all-weather,handicap accessible use of an existing built-in spa, located on the deck. SETTING: The property is developed with a single family dwelling and septic system. The parcel is 0.41 acres in size,level,with access provided by Short Ave. One single family dwelling is located adjacent to the south. Short Ave. and La Mirada Ave are adjacent to the north and east. A second single family dwelling with swimming pool is developed to the southwest, adjacent to the location of the variance. CEQA ISSUES:This proposal has been determined to be Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Specifically, Section 15305(a) - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations,,Class 5, of the CEQA Guidelines, exempts variances to setbacks not resulting in the a. creation of any new parcel. ANALYSIS __._.- -- In order to approve a variance,the Planning Commission must establish that special circumstances are applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location and surroundings that 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Page I ■ ( cause a variance to County code to be necessary. Additionally, the variance must not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated. The size,shape, location and surroundings of the Court property contribute to special circumstances that allow findings to be made to support a variance to County code. The development of a sun room enclosing an existing deck is consistent with the use of residential rear yards, and would not constitute a special privilege not enjoyed by other similar properties. The following sections examine the specific factors allowing for this variance. Development History The dwelling and deck are currently nonconforming to the side setback. The dwelling and deck were approved under appropriate building permits in the 1960's. The zoning at that time allowed for a 5 ft. setback. This zoning was changed in 1484, imposing a 10 ft. -setback. The development of improvements on the property took place in accordance with the requirements applicable at the time. The fact that these improvements are nonconforming does not, in itself, constitute a special circumstance upon which the Planning Commission can base an approval. However, the current location of these improvements are contributing factors that limit alternatives for development. Parcel Configuration The Court dwelling is situated on a narrow, comer lot that is further encumbered by the radius of La Mirada Ave.,which makes a 110-degree turn at this location. The property is also developed with a septic system. The location of the septic system, and its replacement area, and the setbacks applicable to both sides of the corner, also limit alternatives for development. The current physical arrangement of the dwelling, deck and the septic system appears to have been chosen due to these . factors, and provides the most logical design to allow for a private,rear yard area. . Alternatives The proposed sun room cannot be located any further east from the southwest side property line setback due to the presence of the septic system and dwelling. Development of the sun room on the west side of the dwelling is an altemative,however,this location is already occupied by an attached carport. The side yard setback also presents the same problem at this location, and this site would also require a variance. Development on the dwelling's east side may be feasible,however,this site cannot be characterized as a rear yard given its close proximity to La Mirada Ave. This location may also present a safety hazard, according to the applicant. Conclusion The special circumstances noted in the previous sections allow for the findings necessary to grant this variance and indicate that the adjustment authorized will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Page 2 0 Conditions The Butte County Fire Department indicated that the proposed sun room be improved with fire resistant siding and that the eves be enclosed to increase fire safety. This is a condition of the Variance. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission make the findings and take'the action listed below to approve Variance 99-01, for Ray & Margrete Court, subject to the special conditions listed in Exhibit "A". FINDINGS Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. This proposal has been determined to be Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Specifically, Section 15305(a) -Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations, Class 5, of the CEQA Guidelines exempts variances to set backs not resulting in the creation of any new parcel. Section 2: Variance Findings. A. This Variance may be granted because special circumstances applicable to the property exist, including size, shape,topography, location or surroundings, and the strict application of the setback ordinance would deprive the property owner of privileges enjoyed by other property owners, and would not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification,as supported by the following facts: 1. The existing dwelling and attached deck was legally approved at a 5 ft. setback applicable at the time. 2. The zoning was changed in 1984 which imposed a 10 ft. setback,causing the existing improvements to become non-conforming. 3. The comer location, narrow lot design, and the further encumbrance of the property by the radius of La Mirada Ave. combine to eliminate feasible alternatives for the proposal. 4. The dwelling's location within the existing setback, and proximity of the septic system adjacent to the existing deck, eliminate alternative usable areas for development within the rear yard area of the building site. 5. - The physical arrangement of improvements on the property took place in accordance with the requirements applicable at the time. This arrangement now limits the acceptable choices for a sun room to the subject proposal,due to findings 3 and 4 above. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Page 3 ■ Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this report,move to approve Variance 99-01, for Ray & Margrete Court, for development of the sun room and perimeter foundation on the existing deck 5 ft. into the required 10 ft. side yard setback. Approval shall be subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit"A" Attachments: Exhibit map Smith letter 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Page 4 0 EXHIBIT A VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE VAR 99-01 VARIANCE NO. 069-450-028 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below Ray&Margrete Court is-hereby granted a Variance for development of the sun room and perimeter foundation on the existing deck 5 ft. into the required 10 ft. side yard setback. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Division: 1. The variance is approved for the development of the sun room and perimeter foundation on the existing deck to encroach 5 ft into the south west side yard setback,in accordance with the application and plot plan as submitted. Butte County Fire Department: 2. Exterior siding of sun room shall employ the use of fire resistant siding such as hardi board/plank. 3. Eves of sun room shall be enclosed. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions,that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this variance, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this variance does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction,nor does it waive any other requirements. Chairman Butte County Planning Commission CC: Land Development, Building Division, Health Department,Department of Forestry 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Page 5 ■ G_.. .A. SMITH CONSTRUCTION / 11 DAWN COURT•OROVILLE, CA 95965•(530)533-7595•FAX: (530)534-7371 •LICENSE#422969 TOLL FREE: (800)748-9546 Piatming Divisbn 'Our most Important job Is yours' OCT 16 1998 01110voleicaftmia Butte County Planning Division 10/15//98 Dept.of Developmental Service 7 County Center Drive Oroville Ca. 95965-3397 Attn. Daniel C. Breedon Subject: Proposed Variance (VAR-99-01) Ray &Margret Court property 5 Short Ave. Oroviile — Dear Mr. Breedon, I writing you,on behalf of the applicants Ray and Margaret Court, In response to your letter dated Oct. 5,1998 detailing staffs position. I would ask that you and your staff please consider the following additional information in support of our request for an approval of the variance.We feel the following Information establishes that special circumstances,with respect to the property and project,are applicable, including size,shape,topography, location and surroundings,and do cause a variance to county code to be an appropriate finding. 1. SIZE: The current Zone,AR-1,was placed on the property in 1984 creating the 10 ft. setback. The former zone was A-2 allowing the 5 ft.setback of the existing permitted deck. A more appropriate zone should have been AR-.5 allowing a 5 ft.setback. This property is only .41 acres and except for a couple other lots, it is surrounded by much larger parcels. If this parcel was larger,say an acre, it would give the owners the flexibility of relocating the proposed structure to a different location. 2. SHAPE: The property is a long narrow lot further restricting any alternative sites for the proposed project. 3. LOCATION: The hot tub and deck,both installed with all appropriate permits, became a non-conforming use due to the rezoning In 1984. The sun room needs to be attached to the house,easily accessible to the living areas. Mr. Court is elderly and handicapped and his medical condition requires daily use of the hot tub. Enclosing it and attaching it to the house Is necessary for safe,all weather, handicap accessible, use. Mrs.Court also suffers from arthritis and uses the Jacuzzi dally for relief. The deck or enclosed sun room can't be moved to the east five more feet because it would then encroach on the location of the septic tank and leach field. Detaching it from the house,although not a physically, medically acceptable alternative,depending on location, could interfere with the 100%leach field reserve area. Changing the location of the sun room I Jacuzzi room to the East side or North side of the house would mean locating it in a very unsafe location fronting a dangerous curve on La Mirada. Just a —- few weeks ago a young girl lost control of her car in that curve and slammed Into 5"large brick pilasters located along the curve on the Courts property causing over$2000.00 In damage to the Courts brick and wood fence. The brick pilasters were put on that curve to stop cars who missed the curve from driving Into the house. ' r Y ' i Based on the above Information we find no alternative locations for the proposed project. Approval of the variance will.not adversely affect the neighbor to the West. Her property,a similar sized lot,Is fully developed with a pool built in her back yard along their common property line. Since a majority of the properties in the area are greater than 1 acre this case Is not the norm. Other properties aren't saddled with the same restrictions this property has because,most of the other lots are.much larger. We hope this sheds more positive light on this application. Please call me N you:need any further clarification. — Sincerely, even D.Smith Owner,Smith Construction EDate 12/31/98 • Development Services Deptr-ment Time 12 :27 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 1 VAR 99-01 * Ray ' & Margrete Court 333 Buckingham Road, No. 2 Pacifica, CA 94044 In reference to VAR 99-01 Rounding None Full Precision No Last bill / / Last aging Last charge 12/25/98 Last payment / / Amount $0 . 00 Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TOTAL 08/24/98 Teri B. / C 1 . 50 51 . 00 #18573 Clerical 34 . 00 09/07/98 Teri B. / C 1 . 00 34 . 00 #18773 Clerical 34 . 00 09/07/98 Steve L. / LR 0 . 25 14 . 75 #18819 LAFCo Review 59 . 00 09/07/98 Larry P. / P 1 . 50 88 . 50 #18846 Processing 59 . 00 10/19/98 Dan B. / P 7 . 00 413 . 00 #19578 Processing 59 . 00 11/02/98 Dan B. / P 1 . 25 73 . 75 #19791 Processing 59 . 00 11/30/98 Diana S . / C 0 . 30 10 .20 #20398 Clerical 34 . 00 12/14/98 Teri B. / C 0 . 50 17 . 00 #20475 Clerical 34 . 00 TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES 13 . 30 $702 . 20 TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS $0 . 00 TOTAL NEW CHARGES $702 . 20 a Date 12/31/98 •Development Services Depapent Time 12 :27 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 2 VAR 99-01 '* :Ray & Margrete Court (continued) PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 08/28/98 Deposit - Receipt #16610 (700 . 00) 12/31/98- Waived (2 . 20) TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS ($702 . 20) NEW BALANCE TOTAL NEW BALANCE $0 . 00 APPENDIX A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: Office of Planning and Research FROM: Butte County Planning Division 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 7 County Center Drive Sacramento, CA 95814 Oroville, CA 95965 County Clerk I� County of Butte 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 DEC 101998 Project Title: VAR 99-01, Variance CA AC J. RU '' utte Co.Clerk B Deputy . Assessor's Parcel No.: 069-450-028 Applicant: Ray&Margrete Court,333 Buckingham Rd:#2, Pacifica, CA 94044 Project Location-Specific: on the southwest corner of Lamirada Ave. and Short Ave., at 5 Short Ave. Project Location-City: Oroville Project Location-County: Butte Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project:Variance to enclose a pre-existing deck that is located 5 feet into a 10 foot building setback Name of Person or Agency Approving Project: Butte County Planning Commission Exempt Status: (Check(One) Ministerial (Sec. 15073) Declared Emergency(Sec. 15071(a)) Emergency Project(Sec. 15071 (b)and (c)) _.X. Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: 15305(a) Reasons why project is exempt: Minor lot line adjustments, side yard, and set back variances not resulting in the creation of any new parcels Contact Person: Daniel Breedon Telephone: (530)538-7601 If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Date Received For Filing: ignature, RAdy Wilson Principal Planner j:linda\noe.nod\noe.wpd 1, • DECLARATION OF FEES Do (California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Ray& Margrete Court 333 Buckingham Rd. #2 Pacifica, CA 94044 (530) 533-7595 FILING NO. CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION (X) A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee ( ) B. De Minimus Impact- Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION-FEE REQUIRED ( ) A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee ( ) B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. ( ) OTHER(Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT/NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). #16847 2. ( ) NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required.Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: Randy Wilson Title: Princ'nal Planner Lead Agency: Butte County Doartment of Development Services Date: December L0,1998 TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. : 1 .a .:. . �•;e?%",-+ .. � Sit°.:: . . . . �#. }h: -4rR� 4:c, :.•.i:pr.,. at= ''L, ;;y. eil'_ �'� r: 1W ._r .;moi A.Nt:•�, 5. ! a`;.•:: ��i:.Y�-� .:'��r cTF;'� j; 14c .µ �W� •"�%" ,j,' � � J ,`+, .�. 1 r '� �� -K� + .Air, ,r•: i i K err ya t' 6•, � . ,�� � :..• ?:. ,'.:...'�. ...,....: .'ti a..�.•'.,:N' 'r +".:: � :s�''xa't!":l:.:w..1�6+'� ."i' �...iivL-":i_F., .nw'4i Ntc;c' 'i!a'. •+YYid::��;,, w �uP d iir,C.;ar"ao:.f.]71�`c.�;,L:,... ;:w,;;:;;i .,,�' �. �;'+I...:d�:�i.., tJc! LAICO VEE VARIANCES rUELIC ZONING ENV OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM DATE RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC NO. REC61VGO WORKS PERMITS DOCuMENTS HEALTH RECEIPT 16847 OFFICIAL RECEIPT • COUNTY OF'BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING " ISSUE By ;.:.i -. •,l!`,�.:..�.;::.� ` 411 MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: Butte County Assessor's Office FROM: Butte County Planning Department SUBJECT: Ray & Margrete Court, VAR 99-01 DATE: December 22, 1998 Pursuant to Section 65863.5 of the Government Code, the following parcel identified as 069-450-028, was: Rezone from to zoning district. � Granted a variance to enclose a pre-existing deck that is located 5 feet into a 10 foot building setback, on the southwest corner of Lamirada Ave. and Short Ave., at 5 Short Ave.; Oroville,AR-1 (Agricultural Residential - 1 acre) Issued a conditional EXHIBIT A VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION D EC 2 2 1998 DATE VAR 99-01 VARIANCE NO. 069-450-028 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below Ray &Margrete Court is hereby granted a Variance for development of the sun room and perimeter foundation on the existing deck 5 ft. into the required 10 ft. side yard setback. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Division: 1. The variance is approved for the development of the sun room and perimeter foundation on the existing deck to encroach 5 ft into the south west side yard setback, in accordance with the application and plot plan as submitted. Butte County Fire Department: 2. Exterior siding of sun room shall employ the use of fire resistantsiding such as hardi board/plank. 3. Eves of sun room shall be enclosed. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this variance, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: Applic nt NOTE: Issuance of this variance does not waive requirement of obtaining B' ilding and Health Department permits before starting construction,nor does it waive any other requirements. i qairman Butte County Planning Commission CC: Land Development,Building Division,Health Department,Department of Forestry 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Page I ■ SENDER: v ■Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the y ■Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. following services(for an ■ d your ouor�name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): car■Attach this forth to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if ace does not d permit. p a 1. ❑ Addressee's Address y ■Write'Retum Receipt Requested'on the mailpiece below the article number. 2, ❑ Restricted Delivery fn r ■The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date .. delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. ° o V 3.Article Addressed to: 4a.Article Number d Ray & Margrete Court Z 006 768 734 E E 333 Buckingham Rd.#2 4b.Service Type u Pacifica, CA 94044 ❑ Registered $] Certified y ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured E- '2&etum Receipt for Mejandisp ❑ COD z7. to of Delivery a VAR 99-01 ((J IX 5.Received By:(Print Name) 8.Addressee's Address jOnly if re uested J and fee is paid) ' g 6ll tur : ddressee or Agent) :0 X H PS Form 3 11 ecember 1964 Domestic Return Receipt J UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICEaG S C� -��- First-Glass Mail- Postage&Fees Paid ,Q _ i•t -,� usP�------ --�- Permit No:G-10 • Print your na a�Irgess,/and ZIP Codein P,�s box ------- COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING O ISION 1 County WW Drive Oroville,CA 9M3397 :1�III I I�II�11A 1Ili 1111-t.III ll 1 I I'll 111111 It 1 I H lt.A'I,1,141111 • - : utte ount . T - # L.AND OF NATURAL WEALTH - AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION ;.:'• :*;z DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ' ? 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 December 22, 1998 Ray&Margrete Court ' _ 333 Buckingham Rd. #2 Pacifica, CA 94044 CERTIFIED MAIL Re: Use Permit,AP 069-450-028 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Court Enclosed is your validated Variance No. VAR 99-01 to allow a Variance to enclose a pre-existing deck that is located 5 feet into a 10 foot building setback. Should you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services Teri Bridenhagen Office Assistant III Enc. cc: Land Development Division .._Building Division Environmental Health Department of Forestry j:\temp\up7 Z 006' 768 734 Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided u o�� Do not use for International Mail (See Reverse) Sent to Court StreejjNq uCkingham Rd. #2 State an ZIP Code paci ica, CA 94044 'S',astage 1 I , Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee ch Return Receipt Showing to Whom&Date Delivered r Return Receipt Showing to Whom, Date,and Addressee's Address r A TOTAL Postage &Fees O 00 Postmark or Date t'7 12-22-98 r ' a ' ' � t Count LAND Of NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES �_ -,q4`�+;•.:�a-;.;:.,..; 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7661 November 25, 1998 FAX: (530)538-7785 Ray and Margrete Court 333 Buckingham Road, #2 Pacifica,CA 94044 Re: Variance,AP 069450-028,VAR 99-01 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Court: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held November 25, 1998, your request for a variance for development of the sun room and perimeter foundation on the existing deck 5 ft. into the required 10 ft. side yard setback,was approved subject to the conditions listed on the enclosures. Please sign.both copies and return both copies to this Division within 40 calendar days. Should you desire to appeal any of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, you must do so in writing, to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California,prior to 5:00 p.m., Monday, December 7, 1998. The appeal fee of$50.00 must be paid at that time. If you do not appeal and if there are no other appeal within the 10 calendar-day.appeal period, the action of the Planning Commission is final. A Notice of Exemption (NOE) should be filed for purpose of completing the California Environmental Quality Act Requirements. The fee for filing the NOE is a $25.00 document handling fee. A check made payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of$25.00 should be submitted to the Planning Division in order to complete the process. Please be aware that failure to return the signed copies within 40 calendar days will invalidate the Planning Commission's approval. Re-application to this Division would then be necessary. The Use Permit is deemed granted when the enclosures have been signed by the applicant,with the counter signature of the Chairman of the Planning Commission, and said permit is received by the applicant by registered mail. Pursuant to Section 66020(d)(2)of the Government Code you are hereby notified that you have 90 days to register a protest challenging any fees, dedications, reservations, or exactions imposed as conditions of approval for this project. a Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Dan Breedon at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Diana Shuey Secretary J:\WPDOCS\PCLTS\COURT.LTR i EXHIBIT A VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE VAR 99-01 VARIANCE NO. 069-450-028 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below Ray&Margrete Court is hereby granted a Variance for development of the sun room and perimeter foundation on the existing deck 5 ft. into the required 10 ft. side yard setback. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Division: I. The variance is approved for the development of the sun room and perimeter foundation on the existing deck to encroach 5 ft into the south west side yard setback, in accordance with the application and plot plan as submitted. Butte County Fire Department: 2. Exterior siding of sun room shall employ the use of fire resistant siding such as hardi board/plank. 3. Eves of sun room shall be enclosed. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions,that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this variance, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this variance does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction,nor does it waive any other requirements. Chairman Butte County Planning.Commission CC: Land Development, Building Division, Health Department,Department of Forestry 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Page 1 0 rJt am..• � � y.., 9 A �,t. , yZZ 1. N MAr At �••••L.. �'}jti. r Irl �t I.I� .'r "� � I � �; r i , j l. .r—���R! ",j`,C/i+s:"•y� C� � J��-. ry r I�,:' tr.�`f�r.l�.► - •� r� % r '-�-,Jn"`'Y•'�F.ci.]'C.rte''Klf��, �F"({. a, �tyd,1���� �i+Sk S �..i r" 9 `.11.x`• •- ..1w' Y' vtl m ~t •A'.7�'�"�'+..'. —o i./ imi IF tom• ._t1 ., 'ltljj' ^T� , !llRRR444... !;T;G€./1=yrs, ry.7L7J,t•yi .+•rte'..` �,,'1 �7 / 'T (SPACE FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE In the Matter of Notice of Publi u 1'r..4APr �.�.�lg...................... NO................................................................. i .................................................................................... BUTTE COUNTY P euutur_4 COMMIt3StON NOTI E OF ••'PUBLIC HEeRtur.+.0•-r NoUceyf ,Aereger►,q j! the `Butte'ACohn rtN Comm(ssion.tnat a publi0beat Novembe a;25Itl }�Itt1Xe AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 1998 Butte.County eoard,of supgr sors'Room,coupty Adrnlrils tive Center,<1251County�(C atec Drive,;Oroville;jCalffom� `i'''. State of California garding'the followingg'kerr�r11 1LFM DETERMINED3T03 6E. County Of Butte ss. CATEGORIGALI Yui EXFA�: FROM ENVIRONA The undersigned resident of the county-of s:oo:�m,;F,Ra� and'Mae+iefa^ t ;says: constructlon"of".N.s r Butte,State of California . ' anti,WMiter fobMd'atib°tt�,;5°ft into,Ute•requlred.`10' That I am,and at all time herein mentioned .(southwest)'!property{'�',�Z' back'on`propertA"zdne$(AR=1l was a citizen of the United States and not a party (Agricultural;ft'Idet' 3t acre•,afpels))O'catedgor ie to nor interested in the above entitled matter; southwest comerbf La fiAirdar t Avenue and�Sho /eve u . that I am the principal clerk of the printer and 15 snob.Avenu a publisher of APo-069-4500-2��rovli g P 'f(VAR;9ND,1)r(�B € T e,atiove m'e-p"n ' cation-and:rriap`'are'on file hri ; The Chico Enterprise-Record – avallabbleffdr.publlo(viewigg at+ the,office,of{�the t3 e u Oroville Mercury Register. Development Senilces,�CS"""i; ment;::�Planhlrig"t'.DIVt�o'' �' That said newspaper is one of general circula- Countyi Cenfer,Drive;igr9vq`'; tion as defined b Section 6000 Government cantom,,,S 8��601I It on cabs Y (Sao>:` rq ! may„ Code of the State of California,Case No.26796 through;mursdgy,;e:o dit to; 4:00..p.3;' ommerits m e' by the Superior Court of the State of California, submitted In wiitfng'atta6i r►Se: prior•to;the hehdng1or,�olally'af in and for the County of Butte;that said newspa- the meeting listed,above`or,�s maye''contln(ied`to;aJ'fl , per at all times herein mentioned was printed date. %ibt:you chaIlange�tfie and published daily to the Ci of Chico and a�O1Qq-'. - 1+ 0"�l",00ppur�sy P Y� City int�y �nitei! fotfelsirig`'�d County-of Butte;that the notice of which the -ts"sties'' oti or,- annexed is a true printed copy,was Published in elsi£ed;affrie:pubQc`'""' e tles5rlbeil:(i►' thJar!riptic�oS said newspaper on the following days: writtenr'cotresorKleRRcce .. $ Y ered to the anning Corn sion; at or or to,'the pufiUc. hearing ''P BUTTE/COUNTY FLANIII NOV. 12 1998. COMMISSION : AW, THOMAS A.PARILO, DIRECTOR DEVELOPME SERVICES w, •.,, I certify(or declare),under penalty of Publish:11/12/98 perjury,that the foregoing is true and correct,at - Chico,California. Dated.....................N.QK-...A2.,.J99>...................... , at Chico,California. fA (Sign t, e) Suite county. LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES e 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 November 5, 1998 Ray&Margrete Court 333 Buckingham Rd. #2 Pacifica, CA 94044 Re: Variance,AP 069-450-028, VAR 99-01 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Court Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Variance to enclose a pre-existing deck that is located 5 feet into a 10 foot building setback on the southwest corner of La Mirada Ave. and Short Ave., at 5 Short Ave., Oroville. Should you have any concerns with the report or conditions of approval,please contact us in advance of the meeting so that we may work together to resolve your concerns. A public hearing has been set for November 25, 1998, at 9:00 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors'Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Daniel Breedon of this off e at 538-7601,between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant Enc. cc: Smith Construction j Awpdocs\pclts\schedule.mrg Fq��ronme BUTTE COUNTY cc tai y DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 98 TO: Environmental Health Ca�4 'q FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application:Ray&Margrete Court,VAR 99-01 DATE: September 1,1998 CONTACT PERSON: The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Variance to enclose a pre-existing deck that is located 5 feet into a 10 foot building setback on property zoned AR-1 (Agdcultura_l Residential- 1 acre)located on the southwest corner of L.amirada Ave.and Short Ave.;'" at 5 Short Ave. Qmville,identified as APN 069-450-028. Supervisorial District No.1• THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON November 12, 1998. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN September 15, 1998., If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach dditional pages ' of cessary): C/cit- J.�("'a By: Date: Manning Division 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 -530-538-7601 -FAX 530-5W01 4 1998 ®roville,California REVISED BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, November 25, 1998, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California,regarding the following item: ITEM DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM . ENVIRONMENTAL.REVIEW 9:00 a.m. - Ray and MarWte Court - Variance to allow the construction of a sun room and perimeter foundation, 5 ft. into the required 10 ft. side (southwest) property line setback on property zoned AR-1 (Agricultural Residential - 1 acre parcels) located on the southwest corner of La Mirada Avenue and Short Avenue, at 5 Short Avenue, identified as AP 069-450-028, Oroville. (VAR 99-01) (DB) The above mentioned application and map are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Development Services Department,Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. For information call: (530) 538-7601 (Monday through Thursday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) Comments may be submitted in writing at any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. If you challenge the above applications in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION THOMAS A. PARILO,DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Oroville Mercury, Thursday,November 12, 1998. 0 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on Thursday, November 25, 1998, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California,regarding the following item: ITEM DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 9:00 a.m. - Ray and Margrete Court - Variance to allow the construction of a sun room and perimeter foundation, 5 ft. into the required 10 ft. side (southwest) property line setback on property zoned AR-1 (Agricultural Residential - 1 acre parcels) located on the southwest comer of La Mirada Avenue and Short Avenue, at 5 Short Avenue, identified as AP 069-450-028, Oroville. (VAR 99-01) (DB) The above mentioned application and map are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Development Services Department,Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. For information call: (530) 538-7601 (Monday through Thursday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) Comments may be submitted in writing at any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. If you challenge the above applications in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION THOMAS A. PARILO,DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Oroville Mercury, Thursday,November 12, 1998. I � L�1 BUTTE COUNTY n /� DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION !! TO: Public Works FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE:' Request for Comments on a Development Application:Ray&Margrete Court,VAR 99-01 DATE: September 1,1998 CONTACT PERSON: The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Variance to enclose a pre-existing deck that is located 5 feet into a 10 foot building setback on property zoned AR-1 (A,gbcultural Residential- 1 acre)located on the southwest comer of Lamirada Ave.and Short Ave._ at 5 Short Ave.,Oroville,identified as APN_069-450-028. Supervisorial District No.1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON November 12, 1998. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN September 15, 1998. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. 4 COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): "dx6__ Planning D""„"'loll SFP 8 Oroville.Callfomia By: Date: - RECEIVED 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 -530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 SEP 0 `1 1998 COUNTY OF BUTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT SIV. CEIVE®� .. S EF. 2 998 •y. 0 `nYOF`B�.m Et,:4 ray DEVELOPME DIV. 1 i planneng Division BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SEP 2 11998 PLANNING DIVISION �rov►lle,C91ifornia TO: California Department of Forestry FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application:Ray&Margrete Court,VAR 99-01 DATE: September 17, 1998 CONTACT PERSON:Daniel Breedon The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Variance to enclose a pre-existing deck that is located 5 feet into a 10 foot building setback on property zoned AR-1 (Agricultural Residential- 1 acre)located on the southwest corner of Lamirada Ave.and Short Ave.. at 5 Short Ave., Oroville,identified as APN 069-450-028. Supervisorial District No.1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON November 12, 1998. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN October 2, 1998. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): Dk- 2 . By: Date: 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 -530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY :ounty Assessors offic, DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION SEP 18, 1998 TO: Assessor Oroville, California FROM: Butte County Planning Division , RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Ray&Margrete Court,VAR 99-01 DATE: September 17,1998 CONTACT PERSON:Daniel Breedon The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Variance to enclose a pre-existing deck that is located 5 feet into a 10 foot building setback on property zoned AR-1 (Agricultural Residential- 1 acre)located on the southwest corner of Lamirada Ave.and Short Ave.; at 5 Short Ave.,Oroville,identified as APN Supervisorial District No.1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - _DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON November 12, 1998. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN October 2, 1998. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): —T��•�.d:'@' �..,�.+..�..ac.�T"" �.�.� cti-� `1��C�- �� ��. fie.. �-' ►--� �. . ,,,� �.as... �'..�csr-�" cS'`rv, �.� �.�cal�.-� a .yam By: (Se­� .� Date: Pinning SED !) " AAAA, � Z I 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 -530-538-7601 -FAX 530UM iN'5"w®79913 - L APO 069 -450 - 018 VAR Mary Lou Jones Loge VARIANCE to the side yard setback to allow r` existing structures within 4 ft. of proeprty line, located Olive Hwy. to Skyline Blvd. right on La Mirada Ave. to Short Ave, at 31 s Short Ave, Oroville. i•5. ��� ��� .y� yr f,,• �' , f ', [ '' yh 1� V �'t+ i k'n'tx T< .�*tM i ttd::v i A "} s 1`1I �Sa `r, o.xy TN,W- t + � *M.QTION-:ivr,�.,ACCE i THE` MMENGAT IONS OF 'STAFF i.'. MO DAT1�1) x � �« � 7ULY i1ST,i.t991 M" THE FFkN�DINGS t SRO[JTUNED UNDER "A", t �rtVE TOAROVE^TH MOPPE VARIANCE ASOLJT4IIVlD UNDER! NDER (e, NGLU�DINQi ' -,THE Dfb0NS NLJtv1BERED�`l lROUGI i ►: 4.'Y� r"d a r'�x.gr' 2 A'��""F nilhaLu . [ .;_,y:. b' ' ,,ti �; •i.f`,',.i`'.'•fsr1 , r h4 ;# ¢f 'ti �f: r" i 1 r y, 1. The requirements of CEQA have been completed and considered in makU+b this decision; and adopt a Negative Declaration with mitigation measurc%. 2. There are special circumstances applicable to the property including .ivx, • Pe PP P PertYi• 8 ' r ,'ti shape, topography, location, or surroundings, that the strict application of the zoning deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property it, ' the vicinity and under identical zoning classification, because the phy%icul ` r: ''4"',1i(r topography of,the area seems to be a natural break fol splitting the i r " , property B'' ' Approve the Variance to the side yard setback to allow the existing structures i7lW' Within four.feet of-the property line subject to the following conditions: y'Nr 1, I. Meet all requirements o: Butte County Public Woriiks. l • lit"ir�'� ,,� �:. •'. . ''t` }, .,i } . , 2., l Meet all requirements of Butte County Environmental Health Depanmcnt. { . ' 3. x Issuance of the Variance is not granted until the information is provided to the Butte County Planning Department that the business on-site curets ,. the requirement of Butte County Code Section 24-200 pertaining to Home Occupations. 1 4. Issuance of the Variance is not granted until the code violation with the �'1• - .t Butte County Building Department,referred to in the letter to the applicant dated February 27, 1985 has been corrected. , .. t� dT �t f •F. i -t;t• AYES. Commissioners Nelson and Lynch, and Chairman Matson 11".-i .lat 1 NOES: Commtssu&,Lambert a itE" ►��,,' x,�rtj `i t Q�tfx 's :' ABSENT. Co 0"e Ostrows r la ,{ 111< � "t?k�'ABSTAIN�D: No one. oil ,. lr yl,,, ., ' , :;•+• >l�tS..fse•:,•�s••1y1. ?fit . t< `r-Y "' t �{ vs ' N {S'/ + M} ul ht,��,. •M[��f! ygS a L { t•� t4,�ttCnatrtrtanM�ton asked tf,� the property_ tihathe winci;cellar is sold�asl.resi rt+ial '!..t fit r �t.^.k�. ,3�C1Y*• .tl." ;'x,K . ,° x r + L.Al ropert} ht�Lv muc}ifx{'f.a problem wtll it'be t, find a buyer that wants a wtnefce, *�� "t ��.'i�h�`� ���L'�"f '��i�� tv C t ; + r ;htMr Chnstoffrsonatdd�he;could notaanswerthat question; He sad asa1partrliJ• Y+>~1+��. y a1r;t,+rro TPivl wasta.BLM to,add propertyfto�thts�parce} to clear•,up some encroachment`. } a"7SpnnkV�r r ystem etc.`' i i" �SiT sr« t a;• k st '(�����1,,.�{�.t�'�(ftl,�y((��r��l t;,�+'.�.y��'r�. -�'1r�°t�fc;,r(' �t���1�.�°��y''�v ��+-}i�' $, '�Jti..y.j�•r ,rlty,{�, .fir � mm,sstone{r L ch,a.ked Hhich,f' ads will etytce the roe y w:' at. ' Mr. Christofferson said Parcel l will he served by Short Avenue and Parcel 2 will tK served by Christopher 1 Court. He said he discussed the Building Department prohle•'r'- with Jim Glander and Rod Taylor. He was told when the BLM is activated, his fi), +s' the Building Department will no longer be a problem. a A Staff noted that Mr. Glander said when the BLM/TPM is filed, the building proh..ie•tt'� would be resolved, not lust with the approval of a Variance. "se The heanng was closed4r�r 1..I t C 'Qsstoner Lambert sal a could notmake the findings that because of suet shatx, topography or location, "tth-property u being deprived of privilegesenjoyedby,ati►c1 y,citw 1 property owners in the vtctniry rSY'"; ;1•a+ i c�'r rtR�.4fj-f ft +..+ )1f ar t C ,I h � yt R r � �i�'• r� i�. ` '• .,c..,4;zf -' ,:�`A!`•' i��l'1'• � I,t�+k ,i':..k... , rest �4�-, C m,.mjssio&r Nei on�sard the' appLcant Nywanu a Var,ance because' of the ptiysfe:al,' environment whtch,was'created,before the zoning or the.i, desire to split the property. He said he could relate this to.a hardship,on that basis. He said based;on,jhe pbysksl C onditions of the land he could find a hardship to grant this Variance `(` 4 t1 i}t i Chairman Matson asked if approving this Variance will set apt ,edence? }' �. stn � �fl�;,,.. 1f : � .�k �' �i.,`.'"'+;i ;t• .l. �+'• )1`• ti Commissioner Lynch said that according to the map this is one of the larger.lots off of Short Avenue n:S;�I„ f it' ,,h , fr � � 4:. 4•, -..�,, + 4: r I^'j';t• .1Y Y '1�..<r�f •'(�te �•�•' � �.,,,���. �# ,. , t t t• "� Staff said the-entire area is land with physical impairments, i.e., rock outcroppings. etc. r a ' 1 R°so;this approval could tsei that type of precedence. t 1 e � t�Commissioner Lynch"agreed with Commissioner Nelson, that the terracing is,there and had to be"put,approximately in th�at'•locasupport Variance. tion. He said be could t the y 'y_ ,• ' 1�'4 Rit=e• ;t - jt "+' �3�: sr, t t• .,,, .,. It was moved by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by Commissioner Lynch, and carried for approval as follows= �.{ d t.. t � �• t'I Ik i" y I r� I � It �, to ffatte, couft!y ` LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY } � ' �•�cY.r PLANNING DIVISION ., :h:_�. .;`, .='"�:">'�.;; .• DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ` `.. 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 October 5, 1998 FAX: (530)538-7785 Ray& Margrete Court 333 Buckingham Rd. #2 Pacifica, CA 94044 Subject: Proposed Variance(Var-99-01) Dear Mr. and Mrs. Court: Staff is in receipt of the above-referenced variance application to enclose an existing deck as a sun room, and install a perimeter foundation. The existing deck encroaches 5 ft. into the required 10 ft. rear property line setback. The 10 ft. rear setback is applicable in the AR-1 (Agricultural-Residential, 1 acre parcels)Zoning District. In order to approve a variance, staff must establish that special circumstances are applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location and surroundings that cause a variance to County code to be necessary. The existing deck is currently non-conforming to the rear setback. It is stated that it was built prior to the setback requirement. The fact that the deck is nonconforming does not constitute a special circumstance upon which the Planning Division can base an approval recommendation to the Planning Commission. It also appears that there is an opportunity to comply with the setback in developing a sun room at a different location. For these reasons staff must inform you that the Planning Division cannot recommend approval of your variance application to the Planning Commission. This does not constitute a denial action, as the Planning Commission has the ultimate discretionary authority in acting upon the variance. You may attend the Planning Commission's hearing to speak in favor of your proposal. The Planning Division will continue to process this application if you so desire, or the application can be withdrawn. If the application is withdrawn we will return that portion of the filing fee that is unused. Please contact me at your earliest opportunity, so that we may discuss the particular course of action you wish to take. Sincu Daniel C. Breedon, Senior Planner BUTTE COUNTY Planning DIVIslon DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION SEP 2 21998 TO: LAFCo Oroville,California FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Ray&Margrete Court,VAR 99-01 DATE: September 17,1998 CONTACT PERSON:Daniel Breedon The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any;and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Variance to enclose a pre-existing deck that is located 5 feet into a 10 foot building setback on property zoned AR-1 (Agricultural Residential- 1 acre)located on the southwest comer of T.amirada Ave.and Short Ave.; at 5 Short Ave.,Oroville,identified as APN 069-450-028. Supervisorial District No.1. N l - dog THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON November 12, 1998. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN October 2, 1998. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): �YdViI�P �er�erevN Rah La 840sau;40 Codro l 3. Feai&L Akev �Z k' 4- /1ec�1. q._ Oro Ville CS.D. S. Oro✓i II'L uwi ao A S: D. huge Colleae AID i POMON.AL COs1A-MEjJr% 7. O.w. t. S. _CSS► Aln 14. Anirnal ebn4 l). By: zuca c Date: 91/Xc? 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 - 530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 VAR 99-01 AP#069-450-028 Ray& Margrete Court - -- ; Riehter Ridge Road • a - AR-1 e - AR MM j W � I R a 11 r A-R :t _ Project Location -------- 1! -27,ca C/L of Sh ve. I' V sid y t Ilow Ing from property lin d� 7 ;R-1 . • Cr e A enue • ' °�� -- ---- -- -- - f' • • -- AR-5 i ---------- hacker-Ave- ------------- LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: VAR 99-01 AP#069-450-028 APPLICANT: Ray&Margrete Court, 333 Buckingham Rd. #2,,Pacifica, CA 94044 OWNER: Same REPRESENTATIVE: Smith Construction, 11 Dawn Court , Oroville,CA 95965 REQUEST: Variance to enclose a pre-existing deck that is located 5 feet into a 10 foot building setback SIZE: .47 acres LOCATION: on the southwest corner of Lamirada Ave. and Short Ave., at 5 Short Ave., Oroville SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT# I EXISTING ZONING: _AR-1 ZONING HISTORY: zoned AR-1 on 02-28-84#2393 SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: _Agricultural Residential APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Rec'd 08-28-98 COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST APPLICATION: Ray& Margrete Court. DATE: September 1, 1998 County Offices and Cities: Chief Administrative Officer Develop.Services Director Public Works Director T_ Environmental Health ✓X_ Assessor _ Building Manager Sheriff _ BCAG _ ALUC f X_ LAFCo _ APCD _ Butte Co.Farm Bureau Biggs _ Gridley Chico Oroville _ Paradise Chico Airport Commission Agricultural Commission Irrigation District: Butte Water _ Biggs/W.Gridley Water _ Durham Irrigation OWID Paradise Irrigation _ Richvale Irrigation Table Mountain Irrigation _ Thermalito Irrigation _ Other Domestic Water _ Butte Water District _ California Water Service Co. _ Del Oro Water Co. OWID _ Thermalito Irrigation District _ Other Sewer Butte Water District _ Themalito Irrigation _ Sterling City Sewer Main Skansen Subdivision(CSA 21) _ L.O.A.PUD Fire Protection C_ California Department of Forestry _ El Medio Fire Protection District Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Durham Area Recreation _ Feather River Rec.&Park Paradise Recreation&Park _ Richvale Recreation &Parks . Utilities , PG&E North-Chico Chambers Cable TV /zPacificBell PG&E South-Oroville Viacom Cable TV State Agencies _ CalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept.of Water Resources _ Dept.of Fish and Game Forestry(Attn:Craig Carter) _ Dept of Parks and Rec. _ Highway Patrol Central Reg.Water Quality Cont _ Caltrans,Aeronautics Program Department of Conservation _ Off.of Mining Reclamation _ Off.of Governmental&Env.Relations Dept.Social Services,Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management _ US Fish&Wildlife Service Army Corps of Engineers Other Districts,Agencies,Committees,etc. Lime Saddle Dist _ Community Association _ Mosq.Abatement.Oroville/Butte Co Drainage _ Butte Env.l Council _ Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society Butte Co.Mining Committee _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _ Butte Ck.Watershed Conservancy_ School Districts BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application:Ray&Margrete Court,VAR 99-01 DATE: September 17,1998 CONTACT PERSON:Daniel Breedon The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions,if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given,or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Variance to enclose a pre-existing deck that is located 5 feet into a 10 foot building setback on property zoned AR-1 (Agricultural Residential- 1 acre)located on the southwest corner of L.amirada Ave.and Short Ave., at 5 Short Ave., Oroville,identified as APN 069-450-028. Supervisorial District No.1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE(check one) _X_PLANNING COMMISSION - _DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON November 12, 1998. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN October 2, 1998. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. i COMMENTS(Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: 7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 -530-538-7601 -FAX 530-538-7785 SMITH CONSTRUCTION 11 DAWN COURT•OROVILLE, CA 95965•(530)533-7595•FAX: (530)534-7371 •LICENSE#422969 TOLL FREE: (800)748-9546 -Our most Important job is yours' Department Of Development Services 08/02/98 Butte County Planning Division To Department Of Development Services, This is the Variance submittal for Ray and Margaret Court whose property is located at 5 Short Ave. Oroville, Ca. Included herein please find the following: Department Of Development Services Butte County Uniform Application Agent Authorization Form Submittal Requirements-Variance Form County Of Butte Environmental Information Form(3 pages) Environmental Setting Description (attached to Environmental Information Form) Exhibit"A"(project description) 81/2"X 11"transparency reduction of the detailed site plan Letter from only neighbor that abuts the project acknowledging her support of the project. Pictures of the site Check made out to Butte County in the amount of $1,048.00 (current fee for variance submittal) Sincerely, Steven D. Smith Authorized Agent for Ray and Magaret Court Planning Division AUG 2 8 9998 10roville,callfomia ._ ,, -41�1 + e.�.. •_..� ,,. ..� .. �: _ --- OATE RBCEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC LAFCO USE•'• ' PUBLIC` ENV - •:`:: No. aecelveo woRks vARla Nces zoNlNc OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM PERMITS DOCUMENTS MEALTN RECEIPT 16610 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING ISSUEDDD B/V'�)�— • RAYMOND COURT '- 70 -7111 DATE MARGRET_E. COURT: PAY TO THE _ $ �L,/ ORDER OF T _ IJ Ft I __.._ •_1�OLL_ARS.B ortneacw..; ^•' Payable Thru First Security State Bank,Sleepy Eye,MN CSAR Employees Federal Credit Union -- 100 Ven Ness Ave.,'.10th+l-'^- 3210 San Francisco;.CA-94102.5292.. MEMO 1:09 i90 i9-T-244 2 250000 29057119 50-2 i ..� ,. \ oN � d '® OD �.? � 'N C � � 7 � � n\ \ � � , I � �\ � L .,, j i .:r_ . �.I rte.' ..,. j, i 6-,y.,`. ''`-x,X� � RC1�a� � � � � � �� � `:�j. . ,�: . . �� '�� e �. ,. � � � � � i i ' � ,, � � �, i ` '�� ,� � 1 � �'� � x\ 1 'Ss � � ,, � �`, ,, � ;� �� t � � i i �I � U-� y -�.� �r --___ ,, .___ . -__ . .__ , > 994.76 30.61 30 Eostint_t_ — 295.8 4 • FP 44453 l l _---------- m o M � M• � � Porttl I \� / 44 Parcel 2 DoQ e . / / 247 At. o / 448 AC t o� 43 0 _ t� N 2.47 AC a p/W►60-S3 LO r e5 `� ' 265 44 /a X0 E c t 44 66 A':• N W w ©40.62AC® 3.32AC ; w (1105 013) 230. S 8r�q� — — — q _ 06 230.65 O i 49/ AC ;z 1060!33469.52 O J i y 391.01 L r 89 w - 3.86 AC 70157 AC 1 1p ZR�Z� 8B T 2.37At~ h 5� v Lo 564.57 27 9� b 1.14 AC a ©20.825 ©4 /?109 E- ,.t;:. W e .8 p ` W 7 �-a 5 bbb N 0 S 01 0 9 O 2 ✓ O 39 !r , o - 4• _ 2 LOT 9/ 5 \\\9�1�i )OAC.., Ty •• AC\. OP 2 os • V�� \ �� 48 I.00AC O2 s 2� b ` 49 _ 81 3 r;, s Z\Z6 1.02A1 SIL q q� 0 LOT- 90 4Z. 5s o. V�.. : .. .. '. 1.46 C i�• .;V sr a O 6 y 3.31AC M 94.33 T7 9 C 1ti 1 0 C P 1.03 AC 2 •� 24 } g `ti Z 54 w Q Z LOT A ® 1.03AC 11.44 AC �9s, 5 11 56 4 1.06AC o w o ssessor's map No. 69.-45 55 - County of Butte, c . lif3 7 1.04 AC lO-24-6 REy1SE0:2-96 TR .� p�/R.V/S ACT Ric. _ - 33 O.O.R. 26 f MrYr �f f � S i 4t/ M TT i - ���-- 0 FPH Ln . . u Ln z m t f Ln ch oA �•� x rA4 LU O f c OF AI i i I f \\ � i I � � j � { ' I 1 � I � Y✓''r ; t„r ZX-4- ''(' W + 9 AZF r � � ii 1 , 4 i � � i � � � �1 � ti tf + �t• r + 3 Ot WC- _ W'°�►t r � I �t` t C.Y��f' ' tX IAF/+, (�1 t�►�°� oil i � 3 - FF : tie, I k I A � � I ,8 AMI. "Our most important job is yours" g t Steven D. SmithVz j Office: 530-533-7595 FAX: 530.534-7371 Pager. 530-9M�n, License#4229 Cid t It 11 Dawn Court;Uroville,CA 95965 -44 js J, _ /7- in - - , K _ • , Pyr C �I1 • Wool I .. rA e6o A zer eg I „ ' 1 t` rMIA- A, ' N • ! tS. y ` ell-aloe, ls� 8 C3 of GA ?S .r lit CA)' 93$7 ' �. •, - 99 -4- RA - 5-AP, Fflk Dwo i S t _ k I j f[ t i' LJ •. 4 :,,. " - `�... .. ''-- F -... OU� `'� ofie • �z��1 tsto►15 �Y l _. . I , low Jjo I - p - �.. �,,�- _ 771 �o C � 1 m Y �AI ` • m , a � U1 _j ( o LU i Q Icc Ar- 0 } - W W ' i. Ilk 42.� - F f `%`� � _ �pP�✓I � � � 1 t* r k � f P .M • r Q T k°3 "Our most important job is yours" Zj Steven D. Smith y Toll Free: 800-748-9546 ' - Office: 530-533-7595 t, FAX: 530-534-7371 Pager: 530-�9j54'R$@8@ License 8422969'_' 11 Dawn Court,Oroville,CA 95965 1 Lj I i o Wts VATPS F--Xi:`- 03-31-99 t' ?ioolz 0 1 i � spry Po t\. It yu e_._ %Al: b' S 00 00 0 ( to z to fill I iY an toL !"""� v C' 01 4AoUi � C d I+ 0 Ui �I err 6%1 Mr f'`Y � 1./ .� s '�� 'n'i (.r1 Z -9&JX:V: 4'5pTRA0H =Or Z Ok + I i ( I I 00 10, 1 { r , , k - - _ I ii ff 1 � t;tj T.* --�'' ep ` . 40 i CIP "T 777 7 } 1 7ez ' W IDSA ; � � ` (r) � � '. { + Our most a p rta / b a urs y f lY f ( m o t ? t Steven D. Smith �a 3 Toll 53000-533 -7595 w r. Office: -748-9546 FAX: 530-534-7371 ± F LAS i i I (1 Pager. 530-7,-1,6" ' M1" I f License X422 � � - f G { +`N-t-x V ei'� 11 Dawn Court,Oroville,CA 95965 f 44 mKG _ i �a /' e6 V.( Y H TO XCp r1 ii � � � �� t�T � � ± � ! (f •L ,, I I I� ( 11 1 f� - IW i .r. . � II / _ - �.. .. �' h T, x0 +AT l �if • • !! { R f W rt` 1 + � � cc �'• : x�} c > __ XP. 03 -3129 9 - -_-_ _ _ --_ ILIPATS 1 " 4 � Joe) �yo(Y2�/ ' x" ,:*'"-1q ir, v�, "yy! � - 3,"`--- r„-a�"' L� f .. .. r✓ ,,,ate ._,,,a...� ,. �'�'�V -.... [ M .da 3 -*-.w+s. ..+w.r...•.wr.v .-w_.n+sror. � ; ..,„,..,,� .. '�� I J'�,+.Y4 1-09! ,1 Ke-4te.7t 0144.21 I ---''" _71V, r. i rl 9 �� -- o Ms-Ir— MIN n t' Z toz aA fta r — - - - m rn J ' 17 cc i -- I f. 0 �- _. `' /+ i I I I R A x/ I "Our most important job is yours" Steven D. Smith `'ti Toll Free: 800-748-9546 ~�-y : Office:'"!� f( e: 530-533 7595 _ FAX: 530-534-7371 , + ,Pager: 530-95t-46 B License A422 9 � . 11 Dawn Court:Oroville,CA 95965 � ---- — — - Phi 'c fi � I /N (J3 NO P- -44 l e Y0012, P ---- AR ... L* Tr 6 - I i I �I PCS. V—RTi x� 00 fr 444 M 4 TO, . � Ili V � � � � CP : _m iY 1 In m Ln F�AW J J o fp��g Te) I [oo�o Al L'�'. LLL i i Y 1 141 I i I WF" --M , Y e 3) I {� *rsil 4 I t i-d i ! yy t d i f f 'may) -� 1 41 dw r tX 144; 10 OP F-D r , f '� a � .- s l�/f'2 -r1�1I , I VlC I I l / _ . GID 5A t ! E / .a mow- '_• r,.,. �-. . ""L» .. ems:+ } T "Our!most important job is yours„ f � HII # f r ` , �' y Steven D. Smith �s 1 Office: 530-533-7595 FAX 530-534-737 Pager. 530- icense N42291 b�5 i i Dawn Court;Oroville,CA 95965 x -rigI I ilii N t l� 4� v 1rr - do rM or' _ �: I Y� 74 fA1 MP" HTW CP 69 S i< , t i i M-C,�' NRL RN IDI ' 2x4 } � CL x •1G. C-0293$7 � ERCP. 03-31-99 PAT i+1) 5 ... _ glob I a �A. s. I { r i ��_ t R � .-....ter .... I 77 � rt t I t r �fo M m to M ----- �, to U if ILI i IJ I 2 Cc - JJjJ :•' - 77 _. _— W d I 00 "Our most important job is yours" Steven D. Smith t N3 k Toll Free: 800-748-9546 ; office: 530.533-7595 j t FAX: 530-534-7371 ; = J Pager.: 530-9'5d"7te" '7 License A422�91 11 Dawn Court,Oroville,CA 95965 f AI JON 1 i r 1 �t VATM q 1 FE r ?J-. 03-31-99 ' �ioolz o( j i r� ' y u*oTr- lk 1/ CO rte M - N Ol 4* .A _J I0 k w 1 i 0 j t � i 1 0 z f I i r n rt � c I f P ! I I t 'A { k ► , i� �;y A— 3 . r i -r 1- Wit" r J { 4.4 — x,I I I ; f ! , P, { I sig ° r— ( ' a f r I k f r n - � V I. 3 ( 1 1 i e I s I Illi j �..e.. � _--i- � -fir � t — --- - ✓ �''j i IP r< • F") TI; J r { rr ,i n s f lUW/ s �1� ; FAIJ i i4 100 i f ~ i "Our most important job is yours" 1 t P Steven D. Smith 4t 9 l i �� �," _._.. r � q _ _ "iF✓ 1'�,��i�t � Toll Free: 800.74$9546 c Office: 530-533-7595 FAX: 530534 7371 `� �' 1# G`✓( -.7 ° t� Pager: 530- -+f966 x -i } f �. ( - '✓ - License 0422969 p rMAX O �t � 11 Dawn Court,Oroville,CA 95965 ,00 - rM • • I I " e6 A --- - _ • r' • F i a ti �1� 1 G � }� � � � ►r 1 r II r rt 1 r, �� 0 � t °` � � � "`_ �� , KIM I G � r= EXP. 03-31-99 P r F 1 J or— W 1) 5A tr . i ._ . bvv O P •- \ .m � »F .:.x* p.:,i. -a :�.s ��A! s_.�,w'a" Y"°. J .ems" - A��• I ,y' ��.F �� - ` r � P r '4 s t i i r I ----- `T 4f �T p _ x - ! lam'" � ,i�-'- r�"° � .-' �+ X I l!r/t� � I •r Z (o FL CM ►� +r +� W IF U�WUW p Z �✓ OFF,���F � 1 Q ` a 1 N A kA - : - � ( QT. UM • — "Our most important job is yours" ► � Steven D. Smith 1 a Toll Free: 800-748-9546 — , FAX: 530.534-7371 Pager 530-r35�4998 License#422 9 w� 11 Dawn Court:Oroville,CA 95965 V • F sp V 1 + 4i 03-31 99 IF 1: :1[- r00OW51- sa: 1� / t Z0000. f 00V sNT� i I , �. 00 i - - Z wLU LU =j X � o CC ok 1 r i � � N' 1 • i+"'' ,-E _ _ P `T� I ► .- o R*gzp N o dc °z w , 1 i � I �J 1 {. t i. �. C°- /�� I {rV I � � t � � i I k ( t � � ._�t..0 � °- ` i � � ,. i/X'�' �� � ✓'r� � Y° � v�./ 3 A or, 30 11 I II E •t � i , ; { ff i 1 f A y —Ilk r , l g - }} i max.. Q E ; ,- �Yrf£ { �. r �7 go (W1 rz t r @ i f TMJ i �I wrWD� lice M ff � { ,,,,,,,,,,,•,,,,,,;, ,,, � Our most important job is yours" a� Steven D. Smith � '{ - l ♦r' I 1.'F.-, ( I f N.,i .. „ f +/i ! ToII Free: -748 --t958b466 595Office: 530-533-7 FAX: 530-534-7371 a 4" v k�) : 4, �'j- 530-Pager:�r License xn2295 9 i 11 Dawn Court;Oroville,CA 95965 ? y n fr 1 -r y� • 111 f�11'�(t (I I ld :I e P I J �� — f ! + 44 MKG �— *:;1 Y14-1 -- - do 'T 1 t V rau. _ HT i 1 t , c 4-0 CzXI �a 0 5iA }-f N, . I U) Lj3 finF 03-31-99 Or— a i W H U 5Avice . i 'y (fix. « k- erjL IFtrP j{ ,,.. ... :i I C ...w ' y � ;� , .f�• ,..v• ....:'` •-. ,,.,, �. ter:• �. ... _ .��+/���%'��R'14J� _..,...._--.r. ,. ... - .,___ ` -'----{_.. �_�T.�.� _�._ � ._ .._� .�� �� r P ,n � i ,��, �y. Mir�-� CSM ��•� �' �r l.I -r v _ ' y, I i 444 D ; 10 QD � -r r IX, TRIMLO - ��•� L, M V - _.. W d r ' -�N 5 . J 4 FA cc F i <ro cc —f F( 'tr."Itcg 11 C J y ,` • rc i r N i � t s s 1 i i � � � E s I � { �►'� � .a ,,... .-.....,..-'- ,�-_ - :,a� � { �, � W P - � r At6.41 t ; � � t • s t ' � e I i 6 rT lo A-L----V- A- AT 00 - ✓3 t / , � . ; EDtq , LL f , ! d i 1 1 PAD :{;'�� ll � � Ill � � � EM Y "Our most important fob is yours" ' IIa Steven D. Smith Toll t ( 4 £ 1 i - I Free: 800-748-9546� `O r'.�T, I tom. t O111ce: 530-533-7595 ` � FAX: 530-534-7371 r P i l a Pa er: 530- .• v' MW 9 t r License N4229 9 11 Dawn Court;Oroville,CA 95965 f t000 i .00 _ 44 mK6 p � , No i w II l_. • �� . ` � la &N � � I CD tf fl )V Nv 90 NRL NRL RP 5A 41 I . . � i � � � � r C-029387 �fil 1 ., EXP. 03-31-99 -- 1 Ids � s� - 7 w I i • _ _4. . w. _. _ _.. _ __ -- --_ _ _ , _ ._._.___HV 5A VWW b i 1 ,# f ti , _ T i 019( 1 APPROVED Nrl _ � DATE, DEC 2evelopment Pian \ .-- i I �G2 I� /.� Li*oTfm USE PERMIT- I, VARIANCE MINOR U.P. ADM.PERMIT. 4y,PLANNING COMMISS. DIRECTOR OF _ ..... I� ���� ��O��'XCor� ,,., �� ,• ' • , ''� G7�. � � � tl� ���C� � DEVELOPMENT SERVICESr- I Jr J t rAo::�A a 0 I Z Q t r # _ 1 d > � � 1 o , I H J ' -� Q i d k' o --T—` z f I 9 f p r4 C4rc W r ` f esL?kA 11 �� j r I F I i i i Id r i , j / ,F f ,�y��+�,•t^g _ ? _ y I I ' r ..� 111 } I 1}I �. �• .I Ijlt t 1 t � =I Az } 1 fi t 1 . 1 111 { or ( A,- ' _W A- Oil 0. f t l I i , r ! u_• � , .. d J f -� n ► i I-) a' /� ti.r J a a d , Ll Vim' ✓ �_ II PAD 1- IIC<✓�c i ' r I "Our most important job is yours" tf , d„ Steven� 1 D. Smith 1 �t r. d ♦ -f F I I >: �r✓t � Toll Free: 800-748-9546 Office: 590.533-7595 FAX: 530-534-7371 f € a MW 9lJ Pager: 530- ,+ � � i s`t fr License N4229 9 11 Dawn Court, lig CA 95965mfo 4 7 _ Kr t f b�ro r y� �- _.. _-" �►�,�=��'� � I A C6 A r - . 1 t S I t - t , -- Al- C-029387 , ' 5 �. f P, N/ ® C � i DW i 1S)o a2a� � A� ....� a .tf o� rto sr l i F,E--qKatDhly �1 i� A dG6'v o HT I � i F-- k m :I fo f en -rOar5 T Z t 4114 � fit, �tf ,��," ,-.1„ I u #G( ✓'� LLI a a loc . .. . _. W a 00 MM i -__ i' _ "Our most important job is yours” Steven D. Smith � Toll Free: B00-748-9546 � Office: 530.533-7595 � FAX: 530.534-7371 Pager: 530-354+#@69 License k4229 . <.;` 11 Dawn Court;Oroville,CA 95965 P A . I i :• f� so' ? 00 IC ,. rei . U3-31-99 - � I --------------- CD K_ 62 PSS = ' v W RSID, Ptom. U l r f _� r T o q ku `t W I t Cq 4F Wei \NA_ 14,-- i L } , - - F . o e _.- - AV A I �C ✓i h� 11 T, "Our most important job is yours" �"=__. Steven D. Smith y �_ ►✓ !! t Toll Free: 800-748.9546 Office: 530-533-7595 # s FAX: 530-534-7371 `r. Pager: 530-;7-�t6" r License 84229(_ 11 Dawn Court: Oroville,CA 95965 ' w tT PIA IL 9387 i J f i i ..,W, t t , 4000 -El ILI] >0-1 03-31-99 T era *