Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout007-170-0714. Preston and Caroline Minto, determination of consistency with the 2000 CLUP for the Chico Municipal Airport to construct five additional 4-plex apartment buildings in an'apartment complex containing twelve existing 4'plex buildings. The project site is located at the southeast corner of East Lassen Avenue and •Burnap Avenue, in area 20 y of the Chico Airport infill_ map and in Airport Compatibility Zone B2, City•of Chico. (CD) (A 05-25) r Mr. Durling gave a -brief summary of the project with a power point preseritatiori , ... r •.S The hearing was°opened to the public. ' Greg Pikes, architect; explained the vacant land was previous used for leachli-res arid that the lines are no longer needed because sewers were put in. t The hearing was closed.. ` It was moved by Commissioner Harp, seconded by Commissioner Wheeler, and unanimously carried, to find ALUC File A 05-25, , Minto-Burnap Garden Apartments, consistent with' the infill ' development policy of Section 2.4.4 of the 2000 Butte�County•Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan subject to the findings and conditions as follows: - SECTION -1:, ENVIRONMENTAL'FINDINGS , A. No environmental documentation has been completed for this prDject by ALUC staff The City of, Chico staff will make a determination per the California Environmental 1.' Quality Act as part of their processing of the apartment complex expansion.' y SECTION,2:: CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT , A:.. The proposal for the'Minto-Burnap Garden Apartments will add an additional five -4 - ex buildings (20 units) to an existing twelve 4-plex buildings (48 units). on 4.2 acres; which will result in a density of 16.2 dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the infill development criteria of Section 2.4.4(a)(3) of the 2000 3utte County Airport ., Land'Use Compatibility Plan. A SECTION 3: PROJECT FINDINGS: .The project .site ;meets the criteria for infill development of Sectiontr 2.4.4(a)(3) ' . 'because: ` 1:' The project site is 5 acres or less in size ; _ . .. • 2. The .Multi -Family project - qualifies as infill• developmient pursuarit to ,-the,' • �' Cali forniasEnvironmental Quality Act 3. ,. The density of the project, at approximately 16.2 units per acre, would be less` than the density of the highest existing residential development within S00' feet • v w of the project site, a 25 -units per acre project. Auport,LandiUse;Commissront._ •Minutes;of Noel 6tu7�i'of 07-18:`20051!®1 l ' . .!�'1 ; e` t✓ mar, 1 ` `•� R - r 4.`= . =The project site is shown on the City of Chico's infill developmentYmapi`as y ' approved by the Butte County Airport Land Use Com_ n•_issio'n on -March 16; •';'+k�. '2005. - a B. No structures'on the'project site would extend into protected airspace. Y. ' C.. ' All dwellings on the project are 'required, to be designed and constructed to: have a ' maximum' interior noise level of 45 dB CNEL or less in order_ to prevent significant j F aircraft-related noise impacts. - • SECTIONA PROJECT CONDITIONS: 1... • Provide a deed notice on the two existing parcels notifying purchzsers of the proximity a of, the airport and the potential' for possible noise-related imp_ acts in an ALUC-- approved disclosure notice. 2. Airspace review by the Airport Land Use Commission required for objects greater'• -than 70 feet tall. 3. All dwellings shall be designed and constructed to achieve a maximum interior'noise level of 45 dB CNEL or below. 4 4.- Prior to the issuance of building permits,, record an Avigatiori Easement granting the -,, right of continued use of the airspace'above the proposed parcels by the Chico: Municipal Airport, and acknowledging any and all existing or potential airport operational impacts. ' H. ` 'ITEMS WITHOUT PUBLIC HEARING 11. CLUP Review Paradise Skypark Airport — Issues meeting and public input. t Mr. Michelena said due totheamount of applications he will have to schedule tLis discussion for, the s June meeting. He said he was going to combine this with Ranchaero. He said with the discussion'. today, the Commission might want to discussion Ranchaero more closely and schedule it for the July or August meeting.: ' i 2. Work Program Staff update.70 •, ` Mr. Streeter said that the County was interviewing tomorrow for a Planning Manzger. , n r t -a wA mwe� .aa ems! 4� at as a-+i�. __s - ,—ne..,a i 1�� ..•tm�••r+. _ ' - ,.' .•-. •r-- :��"�.`°°"�'p"����"'..v!®�r-aye 3«.x'96'!' _ _ . , , �, ..F �. u � - "-t.�s Commissioner Rosene asked .if this Commission was going to ;get to talk to the, General Plan '.. , .. ., consultant.- ; Chairman Sherman said•the General Plan was just a data collectionrfor background at this time.` Commissioner Hennigan said the CLUP is part of the technical information in th:-General Plan. Commissioner Rosene said lie wants to know that the CLUP is considered with the General Plan t update. , He said .the Commission has been promised for five years that the General Plan, update woul& address ALUC's concerns and would consider the CLUP.. - `= �Auport=LandUsesCbmmisson =Mi uCestof7Vleetingrof�May 18; 2005,+■'"Pages , �. , � 1 o 3 T rF o Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services o ic ww%.buttecounty.netldds o o o- 0 7 County Center Drive o Oroville; CA 95965 c0U NZy (530) 538.7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile. ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * GIS * PLANNING May 20, 2005 Preston and Caroline Minto P.O. Box 973 Chico,.CA 95927 RE: File # A 05-25, AN 007-170-071, 072 Dear Mr. and. Mrs. Minto: On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUQ found the referenced project to be consistent subject to the conditions as referenced in the staff report. Should you need additional information, please contact Carl Durling at (530' 538-7150. Sincerely, d lam' /H Lynn Richardson Commission Clerk cc: City of Chico Enclosures weanesday April 27200 ' � t. 'c,Develonment Services PLANNING DIVISION : ver'i o'"{ 3,h • ' .,r`i .t`-:; �.` � tib° : =a. � - �. he .;` -.. sr?- � t.. - ?-$• l r-T_ , � _.' r 1". ,,. y Counter -- —. ; DDS Planning j $0.00 ^ Person 'Lana (General Fund) - Payment Date 4/26/2005$OOJ - Public Works a " _ (Land' Development) y , , ' Receipt Number . 426299 Environmental Health ^' $0.00 Received From 'Gregory Peitz ' CDF (Fire Department) $0.00 r _ Applicant ` ` Preston &Caroline Minto I NOD / NOE $0.00: ` (Recording Fee) Aunt Minnie $0.00 lApplication Number A 05-25 ^ $1, 500 or $2,000 or In Reference.To Planning Review / El R $0.00 Parcel Number 007-170-071&072 f _ Fish/Game $0.00 Check Number[ Ca ALUC _ $1,531.00 (Airport Land. Use) e�a%s 531.00ToalRcnd*1 ,. Non Sufficient $0.00 Funds ($25.00 Fee) 1,7o Fees { •� 1531:00 1 k: Cell Tower $0.00 • ($2500.00) Public Sales / Copies $0.00 t f. Other: r $0.00 -COUNTY 0 BUTTE r OFFICIAL' ECEIP,T� 4 Z 9 JQ OFFIC; R PAfiTM ISSUYNCrAECE1PT 20 i y Received from 'Ihe Surin of - For j - Received. CASH Title r CHECK 0 By bAVCO BUSINESS. FORMS (53b).7438511'i Farm 75702 - ' �- .. � Y �s COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROVILLE, CA ATR NO 84129 RECEIVED FROM 'PLANNING BACs 0 330 DATE 4.12712006 FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE COBE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE. 4f27 RECEIPTS: 426238-426399 ,P_O_T.-ALUCPLANNING C.,ENL 0010, 44WO1 4697247 901009 3,062.00 Project Number _: ,.. Amount.of Fee tl07 97x079 072-PRESTCN & CARCO! NE MINOT-A 05-25 $9.534 APN:007-160-02,&BRO'iAAA/0UTRA-A 05-2 �9;w39 DOCUMENTICOPY. SALES' GEINL 00`10 $4(W7 47996911 9419009 95.00 TbT L dd 3,077.00 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER • Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division Airport Land Use Commission May 18, 2005, ALUC Meeting AGENDA ITEM — GA TO: Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: Carl Durling, Associate Planner DATE: May 18, 2005 ITEM: ALUC File No. A 05-25 — Minto-BurnaD Garden ADartments. APN 007-170- 071 & 072: A consistency review for the expansion of an existing apartment complex by adding five 4-plex multi -family buildings to the existing twelve 4-plex buildings, for a total of 17 buildings containing a total of 68 units. The project site is located at the southeast corner of East Lassen Avenue and Burnap Avenue in area 20 of the Chico Airport infill map and in Airport Compatibility Zone B2, in the City of Chico. Y4 SUMMARY: , Staff recommends that ALUC find the project consistent with the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport. Consistency is based Upon the recently approved amendment to Section 2.4.4 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land']Jse Compatibility Plan and ALUC's approval of the City of Chico infill development map at th-. March 16, 2005 meeting. BACKGROUND: • The property is, within the incorporated limits of the City of Chico. The project site is designated Medium High Density Residential (14.01 to 22.0 du/ac) on the City of Chico General Plan Diagram and is zoned R-3 (Medium -High Density Residential). • The property is 4.2 acres in size and is developed with twelve 4-plex (48) multi -family dwellings. 5 • Five additional 4-plex (20) multi -family dwelling units are proposed, for a total of seventeen 4-plex apartment buildings containing 68 dwelling units. • Existing land uses within 500 feet of the project site include a church, a worship center, a mini storage facility, professional office uses, and multi -family and single family residential dwellings. • No open space is proposed on the project site. ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-25 (Mimo-Burnap Garden Apartments) ■ May 18, 2005 ■ Page 1 of 11 ■ • The height of the tallest object on the project site is anticipated to be approximately 24 feet 4 inches above ground level, which equates to approximately 225 feet above mean sea level. ANALYSIS: • This project .is a major land use action as defined by Policy 1.5.3 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). • The project site lies within Airport Compatibility Zone B2 (Extended Approach/Departure Zone). • The primary compatibility criteria for the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone are shown on the following table: Compatibility Zone Criteria Maximum Densities Req'd Oter Development Zone . Open Prohibited Uses Conditions Residential Land du/ac l Children's schools, Minimum NLR* of 25 day care center, ` dB in residences < 0.2 (average libraries, hospitals, (including mobile B2 (Extended — parcel size > 5.0 20% nursing homes, homes) and buildings Approach/Departure acres) highly noise- with noise sensitive Zone) sensitive uses, issues, airspace review hazards to flight for dojects >70 feet tall, deed. notice required Extract from Table 2A of the 2000 ALUCP *NLR - Noise Level Reduction • The project site is approximately 0.5 miles west of the extended centerline of Runway 31R/13L of the Chico Municipal Airport, at a distance of 1.25 miles Southwest of this runway. • Section 4.1.3 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Flan states that the maximum noise level for residential uses in the vicinity of an airport is 55 dB CNEL, except for the area south of the Chico Municipal Airport, where a 60 dB CNEL noise maximum is acceptable. • The project site is not within the 55 dB CNEL noise contour as shown on Exhibit 4E (Noise Impacts -Future Average Fire Season Day) but is within the 55dB CNEL noise contour as shown on Exhibits 4F (Noise Impacts – Expanded Forecast) and 4G (Noise Impacts – Peak Fire Attack Day) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibilit} Plan. • Pursuant to Section 4.1.5(a) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, staff recommends that all dwellings on the project site be designed and constructed to achieve a maximum interior noise level of 45 dB CNEL. ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-25 (Min,o-Bumap Garden Apartments) ■ May 18, 2005 ■ Page 2 of 11 ■ • The project would result in 68 multi -family dwellings (20 new and 48 existing) on 4.2 acres, which will result in a density of 16.2 dwelling units per acre. This density is not consistent with the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone, which requires 0.2 dwelling units or less per acre (minimum parcel size of 5 acres or larger). • The proposed multi -family development qualifies as infill development pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32) of the California Environmental Quality Act Categorically Exempt status projects. In summary, a project qualifies if it is consistent with the General Plan and zoning; is within the City Limits; not a habitat for rare or endangered species; would not result in traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality impacts; and can be served by all required utilities and public services. • The project site also meets the criteria for infill development of Section 2.4.4(a)(3) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. It is 5 acres or less in size (4.2 acres), qualifies as infill development pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act, and the density of the project (16.2 du/ac) would be less than the highest density of the existing residential developments within 500 feet of the project site. The property adjoining on the easterly side of the subject property is a multi -family complex (80 units) on a 3.2 acre parcel (25 du/ac), (APN 007-17-070). Amendment to Policy 2.4.4 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan • At the February 16, 2005, ALUC meeting the Commission approved an amendment to Section 2.4.4 (Special Conditions) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. The amendment allows infill development that would otherwise be inconsistent with the B2 Airport Consistency Zone. • Section 2.4.4.now allows infill development on parcels that are 5 acres or less in size. If the proposed infill development meets the infill development requirements of Section 15332 (In - Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act, the infill development density may be equal to, but no greater than, the density that exists on the most densely developed property that is located within 500 feet of the perimeter of the parcel. • The City of Chico provided a map to the ALUC that showed those parcels eligible for infill development in the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone south of the Chico Municipal Airport. ALUC formally adopted this map on March 16, 2005 as the infill development map. The project parcel is identified as parcel 20 on the City of Chico infill development map. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: No environmental documentation has been completed for this project by ALUC staff. The City of Chico staff will make a determination per the California Environmental Quality Act as part. of their processing of the apartment complex expansion. It is expected that a Class 32 categorical exemption for in -fill development (Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines) will be the environmental determination for the new apartments. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission find ALUC File No. ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-25 (Minto-Burnap Garden Apartments) ■ May 18, 2005 ■ Page 3 of 11 ■ A 05-25 (Minto-Burnap Garden Apartments) is consistent with the infill development policy of Section 2.4.4 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Exhibits: A: Findings B: List of References C: Project Location and Compatibility Zones Map D: Site Plan KAPlanning\ALUC\ALUC Applications\2005 Files\A05-25 Minto-Burnap Gardens Apts\Agenda Report A05-25 Minto-Bumap Garden: Apts.doc ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-25 (Minto-Burnap Garden Apartments) ■ May 18, 2005 ■ Page 4 of I 1 ■ • EXHIBIT A • BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR ALUC File No. A 05-25 — Minto-Burnap Garden Apartments, APN 007-170-071 & 072: The Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) has prepared the following finding; based on data contained in the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP), as well as site specific information submitted by the applicant and ALUC staff. The following findings have been prepared at the direction of the ALUC and are for the consideration of the Lead Agency (City of Chico) when making a decision on tie project. SECTION 1: ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS A. No environmental documentation has been completed for this project by ALUC staff. The City of Chico staff will make a determination per the California Environmental Quality Act as part of their processing of the a-3artment complex. expansion. SECTION 2: CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT A. The proposal for the Minto-Burnap Garden Apartments will add an additional five 4-plex buildings (20 units) to an existing twelve 4-plex buildings (48 units) on 4.2 acres, which will result in a density of 16.2 dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the infill development criteria of Section 2.4.4'a)(3) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. SECTION 3: PROJECT FINDINGS: A. The project site meets the criteria for infill development of Section 2.4.4(a)(3) because: 1. The project site is 5 acres or less in size 2. The Multi -Family project qualifies as infill development pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act 3. The density of the project, at approximately 16.2 units per acre, would be less than the density of the highest existing residential dlevelopment within 500 feet of the project site, a 25 -units per acre project. 4. The project site is shown on the City of Chico's infill development map, as approved by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission on March 16, 2005. B. No structures on the project site would extend into protected airspace. C. All dwellings on the project are required to be designed and constructed to have a maximum interior noise level of 45 dB CNEL or less ir_ order to prevent significant aircraft -related noise impacts. ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-25 (Mimto-Burnap Garden Apartments) ■ May 18, 2005 ■ Page 5 of 11 ■ SECTION 4: PROJECT CONDITIONS: 1. Provide a deed notice on the two existing parcels notifying purchasers of the proximity of the airport and the potential for possible noise -related impacts in an ALUC-approved disclosure notice. 2. Airspace review by the Airport Land Use Commission required for objects greater than 70 feet tall. 3. All dwellings shall be designed and constructed to achieve a maximum interior noise level of 45 dB CNEL or below. 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits, record an Avigation Easement granting the right of continued use of the airspace above the proposed parcels by the Chico Municipal Airport, and acknowledging any and all existing or potential airport operational impacts. ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-25 (Minto-Burnap Garden Apartments) ■ May 18, 2005 ■ Page 6 of 11 ■ EXHIBIT B List of References Data supporting the ALUC's findings have been generated from studies and re -ports prepared by recognized professionals and agencies with expertise in Airport Land Use Planning and land use compatibility. These include, but are not limited to: Butte County 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Chico Municipal Airport B2 Compatibility Zone — City of Chico Infill Map, adopted March 16, 2005 ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-25 (Minto-Burnap Garden Apartments) ■ May 18, 2005 ■ Page 7 of 11 ■ 1' Chico Airport Infill Map (portion) ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-25 (Minto-Burnap Garden Apartments) ■ May 18, 2005 ■ Page 9 of 11 ■ J Tf. �-..•i � - .. . N fit. � "1. + ' .�'"�h. ,f .. y PrP . J�i �•� p'{ 4 �. C .t`'�A, ♦ `�. ' 'f I � '1 14115? f "�'� �f - � - � ,�'.. , Ss� n4 '*��,., `P R XL_ � = "�'•' „�". �/ ��1 l'° w'"`. 1. .k. .ar' ,lll{`• .. �dJy 1�'p�it �H IM'��s�'Mw'�6i��? I ., d'4 d f Y •� JiE S f.'� Lprf s "a' +R��S� F.i' , A �" q: "3� - y � Y 7.7�-...A..V �� k. a�`.a G /•�q- �}. .bP dfl,3rS a� f S.a1Yt �7,��"iS'{O.f. .yP�i 't' 4 � .. M,'fi ."R,T C } 5� µY•s-a �, Gregory 007-170=071 M i nto' A 05-25 :' &072 .i S _ t "�- r � •. 6 I t ��� p � � t`,... tib �p�- wv a �. _ M1 I s ji ■ Butte County'Airport'Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A.05-25. (Minto-Buriiap'Garden h .. 'Apartments) ■ May.18, 2005,M Page 10 of 11 ■ . o11 A BURNAF C ARDEN5 , PARTMENT5 01Prap[rod fcn PRESTON /SNND 0'LINE MINTO Propered by: GREGORY A. PE ARCHITECT 317 PN WQo A.e. �In,CA 9_91 IS7a)1 1 NEIENT OF NEM AND MST.* M=N.&S DENOTES IOGAl10N • a ID'O. TTP. OP EXISTTN6 TREE SO'ms rN N MEM E. 10- R TYP' B -CW CN+ OAK 9-G19 •11' E05mK NEW NEW NEW NEW NEW RW APARTMENT APARTMENT OIb' APARTMENT e. APARTMENT APARTMENT rpr BUILDING WILDING EUILDIN6 EJILDINCG ENIILDING Ir all I6' M i0. -� I4• 2]' M 14' M 13 -STC oV . OAK 24 AdFtepltESENTS { PARKDK OOVERED PARNUN6. TTP. 4 9 q 7,= ar T .a T EOST06 EiR5TTN5 EA5T" E"S'"S ElRSTINB 9X13TIINFi EASTo+S APAQT{EIIT APARw'ENT ElosTOG Ep3TRO APARTMENT APARREIR fTtNS MARTIENf MARTENT APARRQTf MUNNS EUODO{S APARTMENT APAFMCNT BNLOt110 C L NE MARTIENT EUR.DITN9 BNtDo� EKLOINS EUItD1/10 ' EIAOO4s EIALOIrr • O Ms—% r APARTMEM OINK BIILD0N5 IN'T ' 04.T 67 11-T .12- OuvE 04,5' s.3' �'D S' 0&0. RW R. QIVf �OU4E �S.S OUK �OUK Q6.lY 15 6.0' N;.NY O OUK pUv( OUVE OOLM OOUI[ IVT n' 0. VE TREES . . . . . . AI.ONS fllRNAP • . • • • • AVE, � a3G0' Rl NEIONNr, NP. )l� 5 U R N A P C A E N A M E N T s 5 I T E P L A N Prepared N: PRESTO PreparedN'AND GREGORY A. PEITZ CAROLINE MINTO ARCHITECT 393 Rio L'mdo Ave. Chico, CA. 95926 (530) 893.5719 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT k PLANNING 411 Main Street - 2nd Floor (530) 879-6800 CITP.O. Box 3420 Fax (530) 895-4726 Chico, CA 95927 http://www.ci.chico.ca.us April 22, 2005 Butte County Airport Land Use Commission c/o Steve Betts 7 County Center Drive . Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Request for ALUC Review - City of Chico Application: Assessor's Parcels Nos. 007-170- 071 and 007-170-072, ARE Application No. 05-13 With this letter, the City of Chico Planning Division is forwarding a Butte County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) application for consistency findings for the above -noted project. Enclosed with this application are a check in the amount of $1,531.00, 24 copies of the project location map and compatibility zone map, as well as 24 copies of the project site plan. The application consists of an application for architectural review associated with the proposed construction of five additional four-plex buildings at the corner of Lassen Avenue and Bumap, Assessor's Parcels Nos. 007-170-071 and 007-170-072. The project site presently contains twelve existing units. The proposed density is approximately 15.7 units per acr,-. The property is designated Medium -High Density Residential in the General Plan, and is located in an R3 Medium -High Density Residential zoning district.. The General Plan designation and zoning district allow multi -family residential development at densities between 14.01 ind 22 units per acre. The project is Categorically Exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project is also consistent with the General Plan designation and zoning for the area. We request that this item be scheduled for the May 2005 ALUC meeting. Your assistance in processing this application is greatly appreciated. Please feel free to call the applicant at the phone number provided on the application, or me at (530) 879-6804 if you ha -.e any questions. Sincerely, 11(7 Claudia Stuart Senior Planner Attachments • Application and Check • Location and Compatibility Zone Map (24) • Site Plan (24) cc: Greg Peitz, 383 Rio Lindo Avenue, Chico, CA 95926 Preston and Caroline Minto, P.O. Box 973, Chico, CA 95927 Teresa Bishow, Principal Planner ARB 05-13 file BUTTE COT]NTY APR 6 2005 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES G& Made From Recycled Paper r "DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: AP# (JO' 7 -/7O -0 7-¢--d 7�- APPLICANT: OWNER: 5-11a- REPRESENTATIVE: /a -REPRESENTATIVE: of � ovw � z PROPOSED REQUEST: (to be filled out by person taking in application) FINAL REQUEST: (to be filled out by project planner) CI,(?ac-1 A,-1 AD ofTie/yA-L rzIy6= PmT.�tyNr i ,✓ �,•� �4 � Tvvt•.� �'T Lc4 �e � ��'z Gay,✓ T.a� -✓ ! ✓� �.✓ c.�-�t ! sT'r a �- SIZE: �% CZ --C Lau Y3 aA"dAp /4t/---Yv�cr .15714,rC4 SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT # ✓ EXISTING ZONING: 0/— aLo - A� -3 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: D �- ASSIGNED PLANNER: PLANT -ER's INITIALS Date Application Received Date Project Assigned��-�I® 6 - IDR IDR Date /✓� 30 Day Complete Tentative Hearing Date KAP1ann1ng\Forms\Lead In Sheet.doc ar, W i •tt• ,�EXp,I�STtNG NEW - NEW NEW NEW NEW • '• vrI BUIL al ' APAIETNI2W HYHK I MEN I Sib' r'Pr4RT1•IEI4T b• EXISTING ' APARTMENT APARTMENT 4',637• 7 BUILDINBUILDIN6 LDINe BUILDING BUILDING ^X G BUI tr 14• srcts• sres•src o3• SYc 'S onX oAic; SAX _ 24'-j a • U�u10,11-1 u I I SHAVED 8 - SHADED AREA BIKE REPRESENT, PARKING COVERED PARKING. - S' % _ TMPMil S t IF-, EXISTING EXISTING EXI5TIN5 EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING APARTWNT APARTI•ENT, EXISTING EMSTING APARTI�E 1 APARThENf EXISTING APARTI,ENT APARihFNT • APARTMENT BUILDING BVILDIN6 ApARTt•EM APARTt•ENT MALDtNG BUILDING APARTMENT BUILDING • BUILDING - ' BUILDING BUILDING BIALOIN6 BUILDING , • O ' .. DUSTIN& 7' APAR7N ENT OLIVE BUILDMG 14•T OLIVE6.0 • 1 3 O OLIVE 06.0- o6.0*12• RW 0.5OLIEO5 OLIVE Q ORW OLIVE OVE OOV{;'TOLIVE r .. • r , ' - - ' * . ' - , r r F. .. r - .. - OLIVE TREES a _ • - r d . IEIGNT, TYP. a - • i' 1. 2. - , , • .. _.• 3 _ wP psi. .4` . •F d''�. yam' .E -. - + f a ..i '*. . U-` R _7 j M E 1� T S Prepared For: • y ti K Prepared by: PRESTON SND : GREGORY A. P E I T Z OAROLINE MINTO -' - ti 4•ARCHITECT ' " ~ ` •' 383 Rio Undo Ave. Chico, CA. 95926 (530) 8945719 . a 40 PM . T L • - - - ! • v .411 « +.i +. 4 r.. .1S , -• r I - r 3 ,. � .. . � • ` •n �' +a .:^.,.•,..• .r. .fit a ��{ . _ - „ - - �' i«-� w i � M., S �� • � + - '' r•y � ' -' , � -. � F •... - - . .. - ^ Vii•.+ , _ _ - t r •-S �. -� .. •,� Y-_ .f 4 V � .. V� c .• $�. _ • a ♦ .T� a- _- . � - � J• .-tom , 4 ,• - • a HEIGHT OF IFN AND •� EXI1- • DENOTES LOCATION •, _ c = 3 �. - _ • • 3 - , •. M1 _ ' p.BALOM '. r !10'-0 TVP. AF EXISTING TREE a OAK •tt• ,�EXp,I�STtNG NEW - NEW NEW NEW NEW • '• vrI BUIL al ' APAIETNI2W HYHK I MEN I Sib' r'Pr4RT1•IEI4T b• EXISTING ' APARTMENT APARTMENT 4',637• 7 BUILDINBUILDIN6 LDINe BUILDING BUILDING ^X G BUI tr 14• srcts• sres•src o3• SYc 'S onX oAic; SAX _ 24'-j a • U�u10,11-1 u I I SHAVED 8 - SHADED AREA BIKE REPRESENT, PARKING COVERED PARKING. - S' % _ TMPMil S t IF-, EXISTING EXISTING EXI5TIN5 EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING APARTWNT APARTI•ENT, EXISTING EMSTING APARTI�E 1 APARThENf EXISTING APARTI,ENT APARihFNT • APARTMENT BUILDING BVILDIN6 ApARTt•EM APARTt•ENT MALDtNG BUILDING APARTMENT BUILDING • BUILDING - ' BUILDING BUILDING BIALOIN6 BUILDING , • O ' .. DUSTIN& 7' APAR7N ENT OLIVE BUILDMG 14•T OLIVE6.0 • 1 3 O OLIVE 06.0- o6.0*12• RW 0.5OLIEO5 OLIVE Q ORW OLIVE OVE OOV{;'TOLIVE r .. • r , ' - - ' * . ' - , r r F. .. r - .. - OLIVE TREES a _ • - r d . IEIGNT, TYP. a - • i' 1. 2. - , , • .. _.• 3 _ wP psi. .4` . •F d''�. yam' .E -. - + f a ..i '*. . U-` R _7 j M E 1� T S Prepared For: • y ti K Prepared by: PRESTON SND : GREGORY A. P E I T Z OAROLINE MINTO -' - ti 4•ARCHITECT ' " ~ ` •' 383 Rio Undo Ave. Chico, CA. 95926 (530) 8945719 . a 40 PM • BUTTE COUNTY APR 2 6 2005 DEVEL®PMEN1 SERVICES z s f s F l s� t .s t f�. .4 P. i t� BUTTE COUNTY APR 2 6 2005 DEVEL®PMEN1 SERVICES • Li1 -.. 7 i i1i r - • - • f r rt 11tt •� � r �®� _ �r • _ vee 1!l711li �. Iji, _ ♦ f �asgl � Ok - '� \'�s�i s' `��Y•k?`�'� Jam• t' '' 'fir ..� ref �'f s�x �.e ' _ i'>FAF31`Zrw +/..•' ♦ - 1 :111 i • � t -- - _"�_,//'CO��i �; ` ,fir �� .4Y. ..i -.? � n 1�f�� �Aun�� Rii:IN• II► \ 'w✓�;` .;�,?y�-'.''�i ;w:'".\ ,�1; '9t..:.....��.•�'tii�i.�`• ��yiW,,:•..• _ ��nll��—_i- "� +,. .t` 'O. `�+ ' }y • r`'�� ' ,iy'vi>'i? ^a _.i s.} rte- �- 1 X17 ea r T, p �• 4 �?�\�� 73 ter' q sty' �a♦'� :Y• .. • . I r •* WORM �♦���,P, � �q. j �t 9 • ���� `�. � /�i+-��*�.♦�t`fir. 1�,..r♦,�e�;``• � �� 3: �1 IMM + 7���\��.f•1}rf �A��; 7� .���" � � �' .. i' �7�•` 7 f-:� 'r. vii .•c. 3�.. ,�'��� � .+`J•. h'e, `t♦ a �,. w r •?''+"•�+'��� •�' 'i �yf,:''1J��� v?/ i ,,•^ ;`i�r • � . �5 S�i, �} � '.i ti � %i "'•Y ��i"4:}�;''r'.•." •I>'. �e�iP �n�. i +� i a �.. m�7-j,•yiµ i� e'� ��4`'�.��.n� •�flj �`� . • r, •.�'�' "r. 0 tai ` H •z • t i 0 { 0 WOJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE #: A 05-25 AP #: 007-170-071, 072 APPLICANT: Preston and Caroline Minto ADDRESS: P.O. Box 973, Chico, CA 95927 OWNER: Same REPRESENTATIVE: City of Chico ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / LOCATION: Preston and Caroline Minto, determination of consistency with the 200 CLUP for the Chico Municipal Airport to construct an additional five 4- plex apartment buildings in an apartment complex containing an existing twelve 4-plex buildings. An infill area of the Chico Airport (site 20). The property is zoned R-3 City of Chico and is locates on'the southeast corner of East Lassen Avenue and Burnap Avenue, Chico. (CD). DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential/Commercial 1. Application submitted: 4/26/05 u Photocopy of deposit check received 2. Comments (sent to / received from): Amount: $1,531.00 Receipt # 426299 3. Staff Report (date / prepared by): ❑ Staff Report in file 4. Published: (date / specify where) ❑ Hearing Notice, if published 5. ALUC Commission Hearing(s): Agenda Action taken: ❑ Found to be Consistent Notes/Special Conditions: 6. ❑ Minutes CLOSED FILES:. ❑ Found to be Inconsistent ❑ Billed out $ date ❑ Received Check Amount: $ Receipt # ❑ Sent them Refund or K:\Planning\ALUC\BILLINGS\PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET.doc 0 Check box if County-initiated—"Exempt from fees" ..`" 4. Preston' and Caroline Minto, determination of consistency with the 2000 CLUP for the Chico Municipal Airport to construct five additional 4-plex apartment buildings in an'apartment complex containing twelve existing 4-plex buildings. The project site is located at the southeast corner of East Lassen Avenue and Bunap Avenue, in area 20 of the Chico Airport infill map and in Airport Compatibility Zine B2, City -of Chico. • , ' (CD)'(A 05-25) r Mr. Durling gave a brief summary of the project with a power point presentation.' i - The hearing was opened`to the public.', Greg Pikes, 'architect, explained the vacant land was previous used for leachlines and that the lines are no longer.needed because sewers were put in. r The hearing was closed. 'ft was moved:by Commissioner Harp, seconded by Commissioner Wheeler, anal unanimously cai-ried to find ALUC, File A 05-25, Minto-Bumap Garden Apartments, - consistent with thel infill "'development policy of Section 2.4.4 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land lyse Compatibility Plan subject to the findings and conditions as follows: SECTION l :' ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS A. ' -No environmental documentation has been completed for this project by ALUC staff. The City of Chico staff will make a determination per the California Environmental ,Quality Act as part of their processing of the apartment complex expansion. ' SECTION 2: CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT 0 • 3 r i K { A. The proposal for the Minto-Bumap. Garden Apartments will add an additional five 4- . w plex buildings (20 units) to an existing twelve 4-plex buildings (48 units) on 4.2 acres, ` which will result in a density of 16.2 dwelling units per acre, wlrich is consistent with the infill development criteria of Section 2.4.4(a)(3) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. " SECTION:3: 'PROJECT FINDINGS: +. `A,, The project site meets the criteria for infill development of Section 2.4.4(a)(3) because: 1.;' • The project site is'5 acres or less in size 2. The '.Multi Family project qualifies as infill.! development pursuant to 'the California Environmental Quality Act .� „ 3 , • The density of the project, at approximately 16.2 units pe- acre, would be less ihan.the density of the highest existing residential develop_nent within 500 feet bf the project site, a 25 -units per acre project. ■ AirportLand Use Commission 0 Minutes of Meeting of May 18, 2005 ■ Page 15 ■ Vp Theproject site is shown on ,the City of Chico's infill development map, as « r ..,approved by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission on March 16, y 2005. `B. .,No structures on the project site would extend into protected airspace. .C. All dwellings on the project are required to'be designed and constructed to Have a maximum interior noise level of 45 dB. CNEL or less in orde:- to prevent significant aircraft-related noise impacts. ,SECTION 4: ,PROJECT CONDITIONS: _ 1. -Provide a deed notice on the two existing parcels notifying purchasers of the proximity -,.sof the airport ,and the potential for possible noise-related impacts in an ALUC- - = approved• disclosure notice, :..Airspace review by the Airport Land Use Commission required for objects greater ' than 70 feet tall. ` 3. ; All dwellings shall be designed and constructed to achieve a maxi mum interior noise _ level of 45 'dB CNEL or below. t J. ' • 4. ". ',,,Prior to the issuance of building permits, record an Avigation Easement granting the " . fight of continued use of the airspace above the proposed parcels by the Chico ' • `` `Municipal Airport, and acknowledging any and all existing or pDtential airport • ` eoperational impacts. F; S . « ; z .w _ - ■ Airport,La I Use Commission ■.Minutes of. Meeting of.May 18, 200_` ■ Page 160-__ r I Counter `LL° 4Y4�Development.Servlces ' Tuesday:,Apn126,2005'-�,,w [Payment Pa Datep P y _ _,� :.w X4/26/2005 �! ,*,V $0.00 PLANNING DIVISION, (Laiid'Development) 531T00 Receipt.Number 't� :426299 �� a•: , $0.00 Counter PDS Planning �' $1,531.00 Persons ana. (General Fund) [Payment Pa Datep P y _ _,� :.w X4/26/2005 �! ; �PublicWorks� $0.00 (Laiid'Development) 531T00 Receipt.Number 't� :426299 Environme'ntaLHealth $0.00 Received From Gregory Peitz CDF (Fire Department] $0.00 Applicant Preston & Caroline Minto ; NOD /'NOE s, -' 3 - (Rec(irding`Fee) $0.00 - ••` r. �t ,� .,;, Application;Number":; A 05-25 ' Aunt Minnie _,;i or $2;000 $0.00 or In Reference TTo ti $1;'500 1 -n•ce Planning, Review/EIR $0.00 Parcel;Numbe r w007-170-071&072 Fish/Game, M� $0.00 Check N6mber-14Cash i (Airport Land Use): aiTotal RecewecJC $:1;53:1:00 a� Funds , '($25 OO 531T00 Cell Tower•_ O �- ($2500:00)''" Fish/Game, M� $0.00 ALUC � r*� ; -, � .� $0.00 (Airport Land Use): Non Sufficient7�ee: $0.00 Funds , '($25 OO Cell Tower•_ $0.00 ($2500:00)''" ;.Public Sales /Copies $0.00 Other �„x °� $0.00 4(53 PROJECFT*PROPONENT �T.O BE:COMPLETD'PPLTCAIT�;�^ �, }+�r4 ��Y e ;, r i..n c,.. art�a?�.r� y #•'" ;` �!`qF iivl�7VI.U"YtF.� i, .., 4�.i-�� :r -n ,.�..,"G .,.�.d.: o :.M4-.. E..;Y.. t,x; "'c� c Date of Application Z O • © 7 Property Owner Pres- O" C°��-�o H e t-r� Phone Number 3�Z cl 57q Mailing Address: r? o • �3ox 4? 3 �551"7. Agent (if any)1 P -e i t --z— Phone Number Mailing Address: 9592-6 yhs as. .:aw.�++cu,,.r� •y^q=r+=K-,u-.h..�-;b x�+ �;��waY'.:P' A �,n 'k,"«. {�"'.` ;`ray e x+-.-ts x n+,- - '.�'��,��`�y,""N. k.�.r �+-E y � �+..,. » . � t. _ •°OJ:Gu 4'0,[Titps f ` p BCOiVIISETED`BAP;IC'�1`1T .,x 9J�� s IrAt miq ��, .z* `�&� �' y "+' �' �t:.�.,,,�,a"^-t,�t 3 `.�a:1�'e "E.�b-"ti hu. tti;c �.�h..�T'�'F'�ei. #`rfi� �I"„t,� k,,'�t'vp�� `d�ia�,k+_ ��,�� u�'�y�,�'-: '�t'��3i ••r �_ �a�- ,� � � s �^ � � � � � �� f ���'y �t `� � n ,'^ c. a x� a es�” �rA�e� z �# E�e� � Street Address JQ y / .C,, L Assessor's Parcel No. DO? -170 - D 7 / Parcel Size �, aoZ • t7 0 O? Z Subdivision Name: cL.�o�e• g BU7"I a Zoning: (� 2j [7COU NTY APR 2 s 2005 DEVELUkmENT E SER";. --ES _,,, st/ ,. ',.y tin's 7. d .w.1 • r 4 °t �}ta �` ds ilfi2.N PROJECL'>�DESC=RIPS ION T, �I ;BE`C,OIVIPj 0.`E,TED BYPLIC' `�'�,� °r .wi 4F�.e ryS F YPS .. y. fti �:1.,tl� J; t(.1l +`J' �.s"';i. '�'.r�_��Cj-4 8 �rRd•�'k- I. 1. +.v.>- TJk : h :'Y,+• 'kyv:r, a�.�Z .: p� 1•f`I la rr.J. I i-; e:^ 1�. s r'{. .. 4 �'.i✓.�°'! _ yj ?,tr,.:.ttilF l. . _V a .i 4 ti -,Mll ,r A ',y a-ef 1.. ii1 ..icu•I o r �T'a°a'.u.CLr-irC}a T2e ,..:all 2-�4�1.,.� l�'XF.:rt. -1tw mt!'�y' - •:rs• J; -;u ,,7,.,• .ra+ '; ., _.,y,y: •. ,..:-?cxrF Ja i s ;:. ; J .qb f.�. . A"_2'...;K` ;..f,.":!. "'1'.'-,.,`3y..r".":+� F:: •.�•` �°��:'�::s^h6 ,: �•":e s�o?ro-F. �".5�':�ieF:-:::ac�a+e�' `F .i15`��t� i��.•:c:.L� 4 j!'r L•,:I(;Stf; �"�Jjj;3w� ��?',.,� �S'+._.'d"�1`� '1:4��deer. - ISR . f7 I ;an..nlzcalile, attach,a detailed�Szte lan'�sho,in�gjx�,gro�undelevgt-zans��the.lova[ton4o��s�t+ruct'u`c^r��es,-;gpen,5sp`aces�and�{' ��';: J .YY _..e ..I: "ie<}1�`e,.df', °';e''�t..��;eA� '' ?`?ti.ai 3:e,,t'*.:.� l'l�i.�����.f'�C.',� :�tSiM�t'��'3`73 . �p.�.ri'1�� 'n` • F ,. s'. 4ti>:'C@ ,..�'F. .s�+'ac'•a��• '.' �-. `�Fn�"?��....�i�;' ��_ � 5 s-: . water b°odzes �and'the h"ez�'�ht� o struciuPeS and�trees�,znc'ludenaddztzona ro ectr descn ' ion�da``ta aS�neerXed w jr, t .: ...±.. e.... ./.,..•..v-. .,. .�,.... .. 4: ,+,= ���...l+nx..,n _........�.e. .,•vr•5,.....-. w••.•.i.. i....r ,nNs.�✓. r..,2.�Aa nlr•..nV .Y.�v.o rl. ..n V.. ...}i. ��a.5. Existing Land Use , � " � ' , , " _ " , • (describe) cc, fnntA I P �c �� 6ej Leo n y' Ai -eis --P'i r.. � Proposed Land Use, - (describe) t�— x T e ex' s L6 JQt -e P—jc LS t-0 ke o r f /r � r - it •' • For Residential Uses: Number of Parcels or Units on Site (including secondary units) to $ For Other Land Uses: Hours of Use Z'-{ o v v's of -� % oL� ti �kJ % Maximum number of people on site '_ ! 3 (n r Indicate the method used to determine this number (i.e. Church membership, number of parking spaces, etc.)' nnl Height Data: Height above Ground of Tallest Object (including antennas & trees)? ft. ` •fi-tc S Highest Elevation (above sea' 'level) of Any Object or Terrain on Site ; 9 3 D ft. Flight Hazards: "Does the project involve any characteristics which could create Electrical ` 'interference, confusing lights, glare, smoke, or other Electrical,or visual hazards to aircraft flight? ❑ Yes XNo OTTE 7 v COUNTY Does the project have the potential for attracting birds? ❑ Yes XNo APR 2'6 2005:\" . If yes to either, explain below: ' DEVELOPMENT, ,t SERVICES ! t i y. 1 t _f -z•+ • x ,. x - -. P axsi, w�+-cy ..��oa: e::.5...rrarms :m*ri- _na�arrq 1r2i .. � ERF�I1 N�� ;G4 A+ G-I'. 4�„� ;r t `y6w ��I{�r O.rrYSc"�c.a'T Y[ (,.'�F�w.LO 44._E1C.�:. 5;; i...i��ib. F.BB : rV�?t,,C bM-du•P..2_i�t�Lrl�`.�E,'�1.T4,°7ER'.Il„aDly"f° e. �'IiBN't �G.a``F ,t_EA`LP iYA?GE •..TyJ�iy°'N��. e,'kI fgnalry < ti Fa t.'�dIA�Y�fET:1�1; •j'�?T�: f 'Y'�IaI�Xa ..S�.. S,fx '�iRr'CF;e "�'V ..'�'i�?;� Date Received Type of project: Agency Name ''OF ul1 co 0 General Plan Amendment ❑ Zoning Amend,Variance,Rezone ❑ Subdivision Approval Staff Contact ❑ Use Permit, ❑ Public Facility Phone Number C 30� �' - �b Other AP-C” Agency's Project No.'. 14p. i3 a Signature — Date (App, scant Agent -M-R W-11112M K:\Planning\ALUC\FORMS\APPFORM.VvTD 0 `V J , S ti MW �V b n