Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
007-190-022
Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile www.buftecounty.net/dds www.buttegeneralplan.net ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * PLANNING March 14, 2008. Mark Wolfe Principal Planner City of Chico Planning Department SUBJECT: ALUC review of Modification of Tuscan Village Vesting Subdivision Map (S 04- 08) This letter is to notify you that the proposed modification to the above referenced project, which was reviewed and found consistent by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission on February 16, 2005, is in substantial conformance and is deemed to have equal or less impacts to the airport. The proposed residential development is consistent with the minimum four parcels per acre/dwelling units per acre. I have included the previous conditions and the revised conditions to be included as part of the project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 538-7376, or by email at mmichelena@buttecounty. net. Sincerely, Mark Michelena Senior Planner Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division Previous Conditions 1. Provide a deed notice for the sale of all resulting lots notifying purchasers of the proximity of the airport and the potential for possible noise -related impacts in an ALUC-approved disclosure notice. 2. Airspace review by the Airport Land Use Commission shall be required for objects greater than 70 feet tall in the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone and 100 feet tall in the C2 Airport Compatibility Zone. 3. Review by the Airport. Land Use Commission shall be required fo_ any commercial development on the project site. The City of Chico Planning Division shall submit the conceptual plan for commercial use to ALUC for consistency review prior to review by the City of Chico Planning Commission. 4. All street lights shall be fully shielded. New Conditions 1. Prior to the recordation of the Final Map record as a separate instrument an Avigation Easement granting the right of continued use of the airspace above the proposed parcels by the Chico Municipal Airport and acknowledging any and all existing or potential airport operational impacts. 2. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently wiih the final map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Airspace review by the Airport Lanc Use Commission is required for all objects over 100 feet in height in the C2 Airport Compatibility Zone and 70 feet in height in the B2 Compatibility Zone." 3. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the final map or on an additional map sheet that states: "An Avigation Easement is recorded .above the parcels for the Chico Municipal Airport and acknowledging any and all existing o- potential airport operational impacts." 4. All street lights shall be fully shielded. • Pursuant to §6103 and §27383 of the Government Code, the City of Chico is exempt from payment of recording fees After recording, return to City Manager City of Chico P.O. Box 3420 - Chico, California 95927-3420 Assessor's Parcel No. is GRANT OF AVIGATION EASEMENT Deed entered into on , by , a_ ("Grantor") to the City of Chico, a municipal corporation of the State of California ("Grantee"). In consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor, for itself, its heirs, administrators, executors, successors, and assigns, does hereby grant and convey to Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual easement and right of way for the unobstructed passage of all aircraft in the airspace above the property located in the City of Chico, County of Butte, State of California, descri )ed in Exhibit "A" and shown in Exhibit `B" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein ("the Property"), from a height of feet above sea level to an infinite height above the Property. Concomitant and coextensive with said easement and right of way, Grantee shall =nave the continuing right to remove all or any portion of any structure, natural growth, or ether object on the Property which extends into the airspace over the Property to a height of more than 70 feet in the B2 Compatibility Zone and more than 100 feet in the C 1 Compatibility Zone. Grantee shall have the further right to cause in all airspace above the surface of the Property such noise, vibrations, fumes, dust, fuel particles, and all other effects that may be causTd by the operation of aircraft landing at or taking off from or operating at or on the Chico Municipal Airport; and Grantor does hereby fully waive, remise, and release any right or cause of action which it may now have or which it may have in the future against Grantee, its successors and assigns, due to such noise, vibrations, fumes, dust, fuel particles, and all other effe:ts that may be caused or may have been caused by the operation of aircraft landing at, or taking off from, or operating at or on the Chico Municipal Airport. CA Std. Form 1/17/06 Pagel of2 R:\FORMS\CAFORMS\AIRPORT.STD\Grt.avigation.wpd Grantor, for itself, its heirs, administrators, executors, successors, and assigns, does hereby agree not to cause or permit any structure, natural growth, or other object on the Property which extends into the airspace over the Property more than 70 in the B2 Compatibility Zone and more than 100 feet in the C 1 Compatibility Zone feet above mean sea level and not to use or permit the use of the Property in such a manner as to create interference of any kind with electronic communications between aircraft and the Chico Municipal Airport, to make it difficult for flyers to distinguish between airport lights and other lights, to impair visibility in the vicinity of the Chico Municipal Airport, or to otherwise endanger aircraft landing at or taking off from the Chico Municipal Airport. The property is identified in an Airport Influence Area. Properties within this area are routinely subject to overflights by aircraft using this public -use airport and, as a result, residents may experience inconvenience, annoyance, or discomfort arising from the noise of such operations. State law (Public Resources Code Section 21670 et seq.) establishes the importance of public -use airports . to protection of the public interest of the people of the state of California: Residents of property near such airports should therefore be prepared to accept the inconvenience, annoyance, or discomfort from normal aircraft operations. Residents should also be aware that the current volume of aircraft activity may increase in the future in response to Butte County population and economic growth. Any subsequent deed conveying this parcel or subdivisions thereof shall contain a statement in substantially this form. This easement and right of way shall be appurtenant to the Chico Municipal Airport and shall be for the benefit of Grantee and members of the general public operating aircraft which land at or take off from the Chico Municipal Airport. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this deed on the date first written above. Grantor APPROVED AS TO FORM: * Signature to be acknowledged David R. Frank, City Attorney By: Alicia M. Rock Assistant City Attorney * CA Std. Form 1/17/06 Page 2 of 2 R:\FORMS\CAFORMS\AIRPORT.STD\Grt.avigation.wpd • Original Tuscan .Revised Tuscan Village VTSM Village VTSM Acres 18.3 18.3 Residential 11.1 10 Commercial 2 0 Eaton Road Planline Modif 1.5 Number of Lots 99 93 Number of Dwellings 200 155 Gross Density 12.3 9.2 Net Density 18 15.5 Commercial None Common Area/Roads 5.2 6.8 PLANNING SERVICES low DEPARTMENT 411 Main Street - 2nd Floor (530) 879-6800 't P.O. Box 3420 Fax (530) 895-4726 CITYOFCHICO Chico, CA 95927 http://www.ci.chico.ca.us INC. 1872 February 29, 2008 Re: Tuscan Village Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (S 04-08) Subdivision Account No. 863-000/72025-4705 Enclosed is a vesting tentative map of the referenced subdivision. Please review this map and forward to the City of Chico your recommendations regarding facilities, easements, permit requirements, comments and/or recommendations under your organization's jurisdiction. The subject request would subdivide an 18.3 -acre site located on the south side of Eaton Road, between Morseman Avenue*and Burnap Avenue (Assessor's Parcel Number 007-190-022). The project consists of 155 residential units on 93 lots, two common open space areas to be developed with recreational facilities, and several interior streets to provide access. Approximately one-half the units would be attached single family homes in duplex configurations, with the balance being multifamily units in buildings of various sizes. The project would result in a gross density of approximately 7.9 units per acre. Currently vacant, the project site is designated for medium density residential development (5.5 to 14 units per gross acre) by the City's zoning map and General Plan land use diagram. Please return your comments and/or one annotated copy of the tentative map within fifteen days to: City of Chico Planning Services Department Attn: Mark Wolfe P. O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927-3420 Response to this map application will allow the City to incorporate your recommendations into the final environmental analysis, conditions of approval for the tentative map, final map and/or improvement plans for the subdivision. Please include your name, agency and telephone number with all responses. If you have any general questions related to the project or process or wish to discuss the map in further detail, please call me at (530) 8.79-6802, at your convenience. If you have specific questions related to engineering, please contact Development Engineering at (530) 879-6910. Sincerely, /kilo.,..-��ec, Mark Wolfe Principal Planner enclosure T/F: March 17, 2008 S. WWolfe l Tuscan VillageWop Distribution Lir. wpd GFPA POWER '►►ii PARTNER (��� Made From Recycled Paper Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division Airport Land Use Commission February 16, 2005 ALUC Meeting AGENDA ITEM — E.6 TO: Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: Stephen Betts, Senior Planner DATE: February 16, 2005 ITEM: ' ALUC File No. A 05=10 - Tuscan Villaize Subdivision Vestine Tentative Man S 04-08 (Schuster and Scott), APN 007-190-022: A consistency review for the proposed Tuscan Village Subdivision Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, which would divide a 19 -acre parcel into .99 mixed use parcels (ranging in size from 3,500 to 12,562 square feet) and a 2.01 acre parcel for commercial development. This project also involves a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Low Density Residential to Commercial and a Rezone from Suburban Residential to Neighborhood Commercial -Planned Development. The property is located on the south side of East Eaton Road, west of Burnap Avenue and east of Morseman Avenue, Chico SUMMARY: This project is a consistency review of the Tuscan Village Subdivision Vesting Tentative Map. Staff recommends that ALUC find this project consistent with the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. BACKGROUND • The property is 19 acres in size and is undeveloped. 4 • Surrounding uses include dwellings on parcels ranging in size from 0.175 acres to 80 acres (the 80 acre parcel is located across Eaton Avenue from the project site). Most of the surrounding parcels range in size from 0.175 to 0.75 acres. • The property is within the unincorporated area of Butte County and is currently zoned Suburban -Residential (SR), which allows a minimum parcel size of 6,500 square feet. The City of Chico pre -zoning for the project site is PMU (Planned Multiple Unit). The project site is proposed for annexation into the City of Chico. • The proposed commercial portion of the project site requires a General Plan Amendment to change the .land use designation from Residential to Commercial. A rezone to CN -PD (Neighborhood Commercial -Planned Development overlay zone) is also required. • Ninety-nine (99) mixed use parcels, ranging in size from 3,500 to 12,562 square feet, are proposed on 18.3 acres of the project site. There would be 76 single-family duplex (zero lot ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-10 (Tuscan Village Subdivision Map ■ February 16, 2005 ■ Page 1 of 9 ■ line) units and 23 townhouse structures. A total of 200 residential units are proposed: 76 duplex units, 19 granny flats/second dwelling units, and 105 condominium units. A 0.94 - acre multi -use common area is proposed for the residential portion of the project site. • All but one of the townhouse structures would be 2 -story. One 3 -unit. townhouse structure would be 3 stories, but would not be more than 35 feet above ground level. Also proposed is a 2.01 -acre parcel for commercial. development. No plans for commercial development on this parcel have been submitted at this time. The site plan submitted with this project states that the area would be utilized for a future retail strip center. It should be noted that a round -about intersection is proposed at the intersection of Eaton Road and Burnap Avenue, which would take a large area from the 2.01 -acre parcel. The resultant parcel would be approximately 1.7 acres in size. The project site is located approximately 4,450 feet (0.84 miles) southwest of Runway 31R/13L of the Chico Municipal Airport and is located approximately 2,290 feet (0.55 miles) west of the extended centerline of Runway 31R/13L. Approximately 17.4 acres of the project site are located within the C2 Airport Compatibility Zone, while approximately 2.05 acres of the site are within the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone. All of the proposed residential uses would be within the C2 zone, while the commercial uses would be within the B2 zone. The project site is outside the 55 dB CNEL noise contour as shown on Exhibit 4F (Noise Impacts — Expanded Forecast) and Exhibit 4G (Noise Impacts — Peak Fire Attack Day) of the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Existing noise levels in the project area are very high due to vehicle traffic on Eaton Road, Burnap Road, and Cohasset Road. ANALYSIS: • This project is a major land use action as defined by Policy 1.5.3 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). • The primary compatibility criteria for the B2 and C2 Compatibility Zones are found on Table 2A of the 2000 ALUCP, which is attached to this report. • The residential portion of the project would result in a residential density of 12.8 dwelling units per acre (with an average parcel size of 0.19). This density is consistent with Compatibility Zone C2, which requires a residential density of four or more dwellings per acre and an average parcel size of 0.25 or less. • Appendix E of the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan states that 8 or more dwelling units per acre is normally compatible with the C2 Compatibility Zone. • The City of Chico's Zoning Ordinance states the following with respect to the CN zone: CN (Neighborhood Commercial) District. The CN zoning district is applied to areas appropriate for retail sales, businesses, institutions, and services serving the daily needs of nearby residents. This district may also permit mixed-use developments with residential uses only above the ground floor. The maximum density for residential development within the CN district is 22 units per acre. ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-10 (Tuscan Village Subdivision Map ■ February 16, 2005 ■ Page 2 of 9 ■ h rr......-M ,axe!` r _�, ... its LAND OF NATU RAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY `s R PLANNING. DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • ORO-VILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (E30) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 February 17, 2005 Don Scott and Steve Schuster 4011 Spyglass Road Chico, CA 95973 RE: File #A 05-10/ AN 007-190-022 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Schuster: On Wednesday, February 16, 2005, the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) found the referenced project to be consistent subject to the conditions as referenced in the staff report. Should you need additional information, please contact Stephen Betts at (530) 538-7153. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Commission Clerk ' ��jd. �����_.. [may P. `• ��/®� February 8, 2005 Don Scott and Steve Schuster 4011 Spyglass Road Chico, CA 95973 L A N D O F NAT U RA L W EA LT H A N D B E A U T Y RE: ALUC File A 05-10, APN 007-190-022 Dear Mr. Scott and Mr. Schuster: PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Attached please find your copy of the Agenda Report for File No. A 05-10 for a consistency review for the proposed Tuscan Village Subdivision Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, which would divide a 19 -acre parcel into 99 mixed use parcels (ranging in size from 3,500 to 12,562 square feet) and a 2.01 acre parcel for commercial development. This project also involves a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation: from Low Density Residential to Commercial and a Rezone from Suburban Residential to Neighborhood Commercial -Planned Development. The property is located on the south side of East Eaton Road, west of Burnap Avenue and east of Morseman Avenue, Chico. A public hearing is scheduled for February 16, 2005, at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. If you have additional questions, please contact Dan Breedon (530) 538-7629, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant Enclosures Cc: Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division Airport Land Use Commission February 16, 2005 ALUC Meeting AGENDA ITEM — E.6 TO:. Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM:. Stephen Betts, Senior Planner DATE: February 16, 2005 ITEM: ALUC File No. A 05-10 - Tuscan Village Subdivision Vestine Tentative Man S 04-08 (Schuster and Scott), APN 007-190-022: A consistency review for the proposed Tuscan Village Subdivision Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, which would divide a 19 -acre parcel into 99 mixed use parcels (ranking in size from 3,500 to 12,562 square feet) and a 2.01 acre parcel for commercial development. This project also involves a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Low Density Residential to Commercial ane a Rezone from. Suburban Residential to Neighborhood Commercial -Planned Development. The property is located on the south side of East Eaton.Road, west of Burnap Avenue and east of Morseman Avenue, Chico SUMMARY: This project is a consistency review of the Tuscan Village Subdivision Vesting Tentative Map. Staff recommends that ALUC find this project consistent with the 2000 Butt.-. County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. BACKGROUND: • The property is 19 acres in size and is undeveloped. , • Surrounding uses include dwellings on parcels ranging in size from 0.175 acres to 80 acres (the 80 acre parcel is located across Eaton Avenue from the project side). Most of the surrounding parcels range in size from 0.175 to 0.75 acres. • The property is within the unincorporated area of Butte County and is currently zoned Suburban -Residential (SR), which allows a minimum parcel size of 6,500 square feet. The City of Chico pre -zoning for the project site is PMU (Planned Multiple Unit). The project site is proposed for annexation into the City of Chico. • The proposed commercial portion of the project site requires a General PlF_n Amendment to change the land use designation from Residential to Commercial. A rezone to CN -PD (Neighborhood Commercial -Planned Development overlay zone) is also required. • Ninety-nine ,(99) mixed use parcels, ranging in size from 3,500 to 12,56 square feet, are proposed on 18.3 acres of the project site. There would be 76 single-famil- duplex (zero lot ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-10 (Tuscan Village Subdivision Map ■ February 16, 2005 ■ Page 1 of 9 ■ line) units and 23 townhouse structures. A total of 200 residential units are proposed: 76 duplex units, 19 granny flats/second dwelling units, and 105 condominium units. A 0.94 - acre multi -use common area is proposed for the residential portion of the project site. • All but one of the townhouse structures would be 2 -story. One 3 -unit townhouse structure would be 3 stories, but would not be more than 35 feet above ground level. • Also proposed is a 2.01 -acre parcel for commercial development. No plans for commercial development on this parcel have been submitted at this time. The site plan submitted with this project states that the area would be utilized for a future retail strip center. It should be noted that a round -about intersection is proposed at the intersection of Eaton Road and Bumap Avenue, which would take a large area from the 2.01 -acre parol. The resultant parcel would be approximately 1.7 acres in size. • The project site is located approximately 4,450 feet (0.84 miles) southwest of Runway 31R/13L of the Chico Municipal Airport and is located approximately 2,290 feet (0.55 miles) west of the extended centerline of Runway 31R/13L. • Approximately 17.4 acres of the project site are located within the C2 Airport Compatibility Zone, while approximately 2.05 acres of the site are within the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone. All of the proposed residential uses would be within the C2 zone, while the commercial uses would be within the B2 zone. • The project site is outside the 55 dB CNEL noise contour as shown on Exhibit 4F (Noise Impacts — Expanded Forecast) and Exhibit 4G (Noise Impacts — Peak Fire attack Day) of the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Existing noise levels in the project area are very high due to vehicle traffic on Eaton Road, Burnap Road, and Cohasset Road. ANALYSIS: • This project is a major land use action as defined by Policy 1.5.3 of the 2.000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). • The primary compatibility criteria for the B2 and C2 Compatibility Zones are found on Table 2A of the 2000 ALUCP, which is attached to this report. • The residential portion of the project would result in a residential density of 12.8 dwelling units per acre (with an average parcel size of 0.19). This density is consistent with Compatibility. Zone C2, which requires a residential density of four or more dwellings per acre and an average parcel size of 0.25 or less. • Appendix E of the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan states that a or more dwelling units per acre is normally compatible with the C2 Compatibility Zone. • The City of Chico's Zoning Ordinance states the following with respect to the CN zone: CN (Neighborhood Commercial) District. The CNzoning district is arplied to areas appropriate for retail sales, businesses, institutions, and services serving the daily needs of nearby residents. This district may also permit mixed-use developments with residential• uses only above the ground floor. The maximum density for residential development within the CN district is 22 units per acre. ■ Butte County Airport -Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-10 (Tuscan Village Subdivision Map ■ February 16, 2005 ■ Page 2 of 9 ■ Uses allowed within the CN zone include: • Multi -family housing Single-family housing (use allowed only on second floor or above. A use permit is required for ground -level occupancy) • Residential care homes, 6 or fewer people • Drug stores/pharmacies, 4,000 sq. ft. or less • Grocery stores, 2,500 sq. ft. or less • Restaurants, 2,500 sq. ft. or less • Retail stores, general. merchandise, 2,500 sq. ft. • Banks and financial services • Business support services • Offices, business and professional The ,CN zone also allows for other types of commercial uses, or useE. at a higher intensity, upon approval of a use permit. • Appendix E of the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan states flat the following commercial uses are normally compatible with the B2 Compatibility Zone: • Low -Intensity Retail (i.e., auto, furniture sales) • Auto and Marine Services • Building Materials, Hardware, and Heavy Equipment • Office Buildings (1 or 2 floors) • Truck Terminals • Appendix E lists the following commercial uses as potentially compatible with the B2 Compatibility Zone: • Retail stores (1 to 3 floor) • Restaurants and Drinking Establishments (not drive thru) • Fast Food Restaurants • Office Buildings (3 floors) • Banks and Financial Institutions (1 or 2 floors) • Repair Services • Gas Stations • Government Services / Public Buildings (1 or 2 floors) • Motels (1 or 2 floors)' • Most of the uses allowed by the proposed CN zone would be compatible or potentially compatible with the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment to Commercial and the Rezone to Neighborhood Commercial -Planned Development would be consistent with B2 Compatibility Zone. The primary issue would be the number of people on the parcel. Since no development plans' were submitted for the commercial uses on the site, staff cannot accurately determine the number of people who would be on this parcel. The applicant stated that they have no immediate plans to establish commercial uses on the property. ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-10 (Tuscan Village Subdivision Map ■ February 16, 2005 ■ Page 3 of 9 ■ • The City of Chico's Planned Development overlay zone requires that a conceptual development plan be approved by the City of Chico Planning Commission. Staff recommends that as a condition of this project, the City of Chico submit the conceptual development plan to ALUC for consistency review. • The height of the tallest object on the project site is anticipated to be approximately 35 feet above ground level, which equates to approximately 261 feet mean sea level. This is well below the FAR Part 77 protected airspace for the Chico Municipal Airport. Open Space Requirements • Table 2A (Primary Compatibility Criteria) of the 2000 Airport Land Use Gompatibility Plan requires a 20% open space requirement in the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone and 10% open space in the C2 Airport Compatibility Zone. The notes for Table 2A states -chat the open land requirements are intended to be applied with respect to an entire zone. AF -Plication of open space requirements to individual development proposals is at the discretion of the local jurisdiction. and is dependent upon the size of the development. .. • The residential portion of the project proposes a multi -use common area of approximately 0.94 acres. This area would be surrounded by two-story apartment buildings and is not of a uniform configuration (i.e., not rectangular), making an emergency landing -eery problematic, if not impossible. • The C2 Airport Compatibility Zone that the project site is located in is approximately 1,012 acres in size. Ten percent of that amount is 101 acres. Staff conducted a cursory analysis of the open space areas within the C-2 zone and found approximately 389 acreE- of open space to the north of Sycamore Creek. • The 10% open space requirement for this C2 Compatibility Zone currently exists, but continued development in this zone will gradually reduce the amount of open space. The last parcels to develop in this zone may be required to provide area for open spLce to ensure that the 10% open space requirement is met. • The B2 Airport Compatibility Zone that the project site is located in is app-oximately 2,447' acres in size. Twenty percent of that amount is 489 acres. This B2 zone contains approximately 1,204 acres of open space, the vast majority of which is located to the west of the Chico Airport (north of Sycamore Creek) and to the north of Keeler Creek. It is anticipated that much of this existing open space will remain in open space. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: No environmental documentation has been completed for this project by ALUC staff. The City of Chico staff will complete an environmental initial study and make a determination per the California Environmental Quality Act as part of their processing of the -esting tentative subdivision map. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission'find ALUC File No. A 05-10 (TuscanVillage Subdivision Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map) consistent with the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, subject to the findings and conditions found in Exhibit A. ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ALUC File No. A 05-10 (Tuscan Village Subdivision Map ■ February 16, 2005 ■ Page 4 of 9 ■ • Exhibits: A: Findings B: List of References C: Table 2A Primary Compatibility Criteria D: Project Location and Compatibility Zone Map E: Site Plan • k:\planning\aluc\reports\tuscan village a 05-10 agenda report.doc ■ Butte County. Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-10 (Tuscan Village Subdivision Map ■ February 16, 2005 ■ Page 5 of 9 ■ 0 EXHIBIT A BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR ALUC FILE NO. 05-10 (TUSCAN VILLAGE SUBDIVISION S 04-08 VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP), APN 007-190-022 The Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) has prepared the following findings based on data contained in the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for the Chico Municipal Airport, as well as site specific information submitted by the applicant and ALUC staff. The following findings have been prepared at the direction of the ALUC and are for the consideration of the Lead Agency (City of Chico) when making a decision on the project. SECTION 1: ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS A. No environmental documentation was submitted at the time of project review. The City of Chico staff will complete an environmental initial study and make a determination per the California Environmental Quality Act as part of their processing of the vesting tentative subdivision map. SECTION 2: CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT A. The proposal for the Tuscan Village Subdivision Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map S, 04-08, which would divide a 19 -acre parcel into 99 mixed use parcels (ranging in size from 3,500 to 12,562 square feet) and a 2.01 acre parcel for commercial development, a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Low Density Residential to Commercial, and a Rezone from Suburban Residential to Neighborhood Commercial -Planned Development, is consistent with Compatibility Zones B2 and C2 as found in the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. SECTION 3: PROJECT FINDINGS: A. The residential portion of the project is consistent with Airport Compatibility Zone C2 because the average number of the dwellings would be greater than four (4) per acre. B. The General Plan Amendment to Commercial and the Rezone to Neighborhood Commercial -Planned Development is consistent with Airport Compatibility Zone, B2 because this compatibility zone allows most types of commercial uses. C.. Commercial development on the project site is subject to additional consistency review by the Airport Land Use Commission. D. No structures on the project site would extend into protected airspace. E. The project site is outside the 55 dB CNEL noise contour. ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-10 (Tuscan Village Subdivision Map ■ February 16, 2005 N Page 6 of 9 ■ SECTION 4: PROJECT CONDITIONS: 1. Provide a deed notice for the sale of all resulting lots notifying purchasers of, the proximity'of the airport and the potential for possible noise -related impacts in an ALUC-approved disclosure notice. 2. Airspace review by the Airport Land Use Commission _shall be required for objects greater than 70 feet tall in the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone and 100 feet tall in the C2 Airport Compatibility Zone. 3. Review by the Airport Land Use Commission shall be required for any commercial development on the " project site. The City of Chico Planning Division shall submit the conceptual plan for commercial use to ALUC for consistency review prior to review by the City of Chico Planning Commission. 4. All street lights shall be fully shielded. ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-10 (Tuscan Village Subdivision Map ■ February 16, 2005 ■ Page 7 of 9 ■ EXHIBIT B List of References Data supporting the ALUC's findings have been generated from studies and re-3orts prepared by recognized professionals and agencies with expertise in Airport Land Use Planning and land use compatibility. These include, but are not.limited to: Butte County 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, January 2002 ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-10 ( Tuscan Village Subdivision Map ■ February 16, 2005 ■ Page 8 of 9 ■ Countywide Policies j•Chapter 2 Maximum Densities / Intensities Additional Criteria 81 Approach/Departure <0.1 Zone (minimum and parcel size Sideline Zone 2-10.0 acres) 82 Extended !02 Approach/Departure (average Zone parcel size >_ 5.0 acres) 25 50 Not 30% Appli- cable 50 100 130 20% C Traffic Pattern (1) s02 100 300 390 10% (average parcel size z 5:0 acres) or u ► Children's schools, t0 day care centers," libraries Hospitals, nursing homes ► Highly noise -sensitive uses (e.g. outdoor the- aters) ► Aboveground bulk stor- age of hazardous materi- als " ateri-als" Hazards to flight9 ► Children's schools,t0 day care centers," libraries ► Hospitals, nursing homes ► Highly noise -sensitive uses (e.g, outdoor the- aters) ► Hazards to flight9 ► Children's schools,t0 day care centers," libraries ► Hospitals, nursing homes Hazards to.flight9 ► Locate :lructures maximum distancefrom extended runway ;enterline ► Minimus NLR of 25 dB in. residences and buildings with noise -sensitive uses 13 ► Airspace: review required for objects >35 feet tall j4 ► Avigation easement dedica- tion ► Minimum NLA of 20 dB in residences (including mo- bile horr;es) and buildings with not -pe -sensitive uses 13 ► Airspace: review required for objects >70 feet tall ► Deed ndce required ► Deed nctice required ► Airspac®: review required for objects > 100 feet tall Other Uses Zone Locations Residential (people/ac) z Req'd Open < Other, Development Prohibited Uses s (du/ni' Aver- Single with Land' Conditions age' Acre' Bonus' A Runway_ Protection 0 10 Not Not All ► All structures except ► Avigatioi easement dedica- Zone Appli- Appli Remain- aeronautical facilities with tion and cable cable ing location set by FAA crite- within Building Compatibility Zone Appli- Compatibility Zone ria, Restriction Line cable ► Assemblages of people ► :Objects exceeding FAR Part 77 height limits ► Aboveground bulk stor- age of hazardous materi- als ► Hazards to flight' 81 Approach/Departure <0.1 Zone (minimum and parcel size Sideline Zone 2-10.0 acres) 82 Extended !02 Approach/Departure (average Zone parcel size >_ 5.0 acres) 25 50 Not 30% Appli- cable 50 100 130 20% C Traffic Pattern (1) s02 100 300 390 10% (average parcel size z 5:0 acres) or u ► Children's schools, t0 day care centers," libraries Hospitals, nursing homes ► Highly noise -sensitive uses (e.g. outdoor the- aters) ► Aboveground bulk stor- age of hazardous materi- als " ateri-als" Hazards to flight9 ► Children's schools,t0 day care centers," libraries ► Hospitals, nursing homes ► Highly noise -sensitive uses (e.g, outdoor the- aters) ► Hazards to flight9 ► Children's schools,t0 day care centers," libraries ► Hospitals, nursing homes Hazards to.flight9 ► Locate :lructures maximum distancefrom extended runway ;enterline ► Minimus NLR of 25 dB in. residences and buildings with noise -sensitive uses 13 ► Airspace: review required for objects >35 feet tall j4 ► Avigation easement dedica- tion ► Minimum NLA of 20 dB in residences (including mo- bile horr;es) and buildings with not -pe -sensitive uses 13 ► Airspace: review required for objects >70 feet tall ► Deed ndce required ► Deed nctice required ► Airspac®: review required for objects > 100 feet tall Table 2A. .Primary Compatibility Criteria Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-10 (Tuscan Village Subdivision Map ■ February 16, 2005 ■ Page 9 of 9 ■ (2) X4.0 (average parcel size s0.2 acres) D Other No 'No. No ► Hazards to flight' ► Airspace review required Airport:.Environs Limit Limit Reg1 for objects > 100 feet tall ' Height Review Same as Underlying Not Same as Underlying ' ► Airspaces review required Overlay Compatibility Zone Appli- Compatibility Zone for objects >35 feet tall 12 cable ► Avigatio3i easement dedica- tion regmired Table 2A. .Primary Compatibility Criteria Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-10 (Tuscan Village Subdivision Map ■ February 16, 2005 ■ Page 9 of 9 ■ v • • Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Friday,'February 04, 2005 8:40 AM To: 'SASPlanning@sbcglobal.net' Subject: Revised Agenda Report - Tuscan Village Steve, Oops! I noticed that I made a mistake in the Tuscan Village ALUC report that I sent to you earlier. I said that the project site was within the 60 dB CNEL noise contour, but that is wrong; the project site is outside of the 55 dB CNEL noise contour (I used a previous report and didn't change that paragraph). I also adJed a finding stating that the project was outside the 55 dB CNEL noise contour. Thanks again. -s- Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk (530) 538-7153 Fax (530) 538-7785 2/4/2005 • • Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:09 AM To: 'SASPlanning@sbcglobal.net' Subject: ALUC Review - Agenda Report for Tuscan Village Steve, Attached for your review is the agenda report for the Tuscan Village ALUC project. This project seems to be pretty straight forward, although we are recommending that conceptal development plans for future commercial development on the site undergo ALUC review. The residential portion of the project is consistant with the C2 compatibility zone. This needs to be reviewed ASAP if we are to make this month's ALUC meeting. Thanks. &I Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk (530) 538-7153 Fax (530) 538-7785 2/4/2005 Betts, Steve From: Ed Palmeri [EPALMERI@ci.chico.ca.us] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 12:08 PM To: Betts, Steve J^ Cc: Ed Palmeri Subject: Re: ALUC review of the Tuscan Village GPA/Rezone/TSM project The applicant is requesting a general plan and zone change only for t7ae commercial property. At this time.they have no proposed plans for the commercial portion of the project. The zoning for the commercial portion of the site will be C.1 -PD (Neighborhood Commercial -Planned Development overlay zone). Any future development on the site would require further review by the Planning Commission and approval of a planned development permit. On January 24, 2005, the City of Chico is getting a new phone system My new phone number will be,(530) 879-6809. The main phone number for Planning will be (530) 879-6800. Please make a note of this for your records. Thanks >>> "Betts, Steve" <SBetts@buttecounty.net> 1/19/2005 4:00:28 PM >>> Ed, I I was assigned this project several weeks ago. I have not had a chance to do much with it, but I am hoping to have the report finished in time to make the F-ebruary 16th Airport Land Use Commission meeting. The project appears to be consistent with the C-2 compatibility zone, but I think I need a little more information about the future commercial uses. What would be the exact zoning for the 2.01 acres and what is the estimated number of people who would be in that area at any one time? I need this information to determine if the project would be -consistent with the B-2 zone (average of 50 people per acre, with no more than 100 people on a single acre). Thanks for your help. , Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk (530) 538-7153 Fax (530) 538-7785 Betts, Steve Page 1 of 1 From: Betts, Steve Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 4:00 PM To: 'Ed Palmeri' Subject: ALUC review of the Tuscan Village GPA/Rezone/TSM project Ed, I was assigned this project several weeks ago. I have not had a chance to do much with it, but I am hoping to have the report finished in time to make the February 16th Airport Land Use Commission meeting. The project appears to be consistent with the C-2 compatibility zone, but I think I need a little more information about the future commercial uses. What would be the exact zoning for the 2.01 acres and what is the estimated number of people who would be in that area at any one time? I need this information to determine if the project would be consistent with the B-2 zone (average of 50 people per acre, with no more than 100 people on a single acre). Thanks for your help. Steve Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk (530) 538-7153 Fax (530) 538-7785 1/19/2005 i t, • A f, BUTTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COUNTY �^ PLANNING DEC 2 9 2nO4 411 Main Street CITYorCHICO " P.O. Box 3420 IDEVELOPAIENT SERVICES wC.1872 Chico, CA 95927 (530) 895-4851 Fax (530) 895-4726 December 21, 2004 http://vvww.ci.chico.ca.us Butte County Airport Land Use Commission Attn: Steve Betts 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 RE: Request for ALUC Review - City of Chico Application: Tuscan Village General Plan Amendment/Rezone 04-05, Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Planned Development Permit S/PDP 04-08 (Schuster and Scott) With this letter, the City of Chico Planning Division is forwarding a Butte County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) application for consistency findings for the above -referenced project. Enclosed is the completed ALUC application and a check for $1,531.00. Also, enclosed for your review is .a location map, copies of the subdivision map, and 24 copies of maps showing the relationship of the project site to the airport boundary and runways. The residential portion of the site is identified on the Chico Municipal Airport Compatibility Map as within -w-he boundaries of Zone C2 and the commercial portion is identified as within the boundaries of Zcne B2. The project consists of a General Plan Amendment to amend a land use designation from Mixed Use Neighborhood Core, Medium Density Residential, Open Space and Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential (4.01 to 14 dwelling.units per gross acre), a rezone from PMU (Planned Mixed Use) to R2 -PD (Medium Density Residential -Planned Development overlF7y zone), tentative subdivision map to create 99 mixed-use residential lots, including single-family residential and multi -family residential lots for a total of 200 residential units on approximately 16.69 acres. In addition 2.01 acres, located at the southwest intersection of Bumap Avenue.and Eaton Road will be developed with commercial uses ata future date. The project site is located or. the south side of Eaton Road, between Bumap and Morseman Avenues. The property is identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 007-190-022. Your assistance in processing this application is greatly appreciated. Please feel free to call me at (530) 895-4795 if you have any questions. 9dPa 'ely, meri Associate Planner . ATTACHMENTS cc: GPA/RZ 04-05 and S/PDP 04-08 File =:1 JAN 0 4 200E BUTTE COUNi'1 FLANKING DIVISION. OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA gam& Made From Recycled Paper •r "DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: rT 05 - /•U AP# Eb 7- 02 2- APPLICANT: APPLICANT: koTr ©D-/ .OWNER: REPRESENTATIVE: a PROPOSED REQUEST: (to be filled out by person taking in application) 4jF ST: (to be filled out by project planner) U st_ "m i s s i o vt Co t t o o4 i6e v S S4J(0&Vj "oh S SIN t vt 4 f ce S Q 'v\1 c' ed`c' tmo-�- too Z.dl K&,(1 cLk urk S w oowek toe am +WC 6j e- SIZE:'(-t31G 2,0 ,%,--/LfS LOCATION: 0 -4At- Ga-A-�\ S Opts 04 Eq w� E040vt qJ �n I�t.i: we S' o� �r�Q Avtv►� C o . SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT # 3 EXISTING ZONING: ,1 - _ GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ASSIGNED PLANNER:�Jt- PLANNER's INITIALS Date Application Received JAW Date Prosect Assigned i 1 C,106- IDR Date RECEEVED 30 Day Complete �— JAN 0 Luuo* Preset Hearing Date BUTTE COUNIF r!.ANNi' 4G DIVISION OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA KAP1anning\Forms\Lead In Sheet.doc ea COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST County Offices and Cities: Chief Administrative Officer X Develop. Services Director X Public Works Director X Environmental Health X Assesor X Building Manager Sheriff _ BCAG AL.UC X LAFCo _ Air Quality Mgmt. _ BL.tte Co. Farm Bureau _ Biggs _ Gridley _ Chico _ Oroville _ Paradise _ Chico Airport Commission Information Systems Dept. _ Animal Control X Agricultural Commission X County Counsel Irrigation District: Butte Water —Biggs/W. Gridley Water Durham Irrigation _ _ OWID _ Paradise Irrigation _ _ Fichvale Irrigation Table Mountain Irrigation _ Thermalito Irrigation _ Other Domestic Water _ Butte Water District _California Water Service Co. _ Del Oro Water Co. OWID _Thermalito IrrigationDistrict Other Sewer _ Butte Water District _ Themalito Irrigation _ sterling City Sewer Main Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) _ L.O.A. PUD Fire Protection X California Department of Forestry _ EI Medio Fire Protection District Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Durham Area Recreation _ Feather River Rec. & Park Paradise Recreation & Park Richvale Recreation & Parks Utilities PG&E North - Chico _ Chambers Cable TV _ Pacific Bell PG&E South- Oroville Viacom Cable TV State Agencies _ CalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept. of Water Resources _ Dept. of Fish and Game _ Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter) _ Dept of Parks and Rec. _ Highway Patrol _ Central Reg. Water Quality Cont. _ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program _ Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations _ Department of Conservation _ Off. of Mining Reclamation Dept.Social Services, Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies _ US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management _ US Fish & Wildlife Service Army Corps of Engineers _ National Marine. Fisheries Sservice Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. _ Lime Saddle Dist _ Community Association School Districts _ Drainage _ Butte Env.l Council _ Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society _ Butte Co. Mining Committee _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. _ Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancy Mosq. Abatement. Oroville/Butte Co K:\Planning\Forms\DISTR.wpd S/PDP 04-08 (Tuscan Village) Located at Eaton Road between Moreseman and 0 goo Feer a Bumap Avenues; APN 007-190-022-000 N GIS PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE #: A 05-10 J AP #: 007-190-022 APPLICANT: ADDRESS: OWNER: REPRESENTATIVE: ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / Don Scott and Steve Shuster 4011 Spyglass Road, Chico, CA 95973 Same None None LOCATION: Don Scott/Steve Schuster, Butte County Airport Land Use Commission consistency review of the Tuscan Village Subdivision Vesting Tentative Map, to divide a 19 -acre parcel into 99 mixed use parcels (ranging in size from 3,500 to 12,562 square feet) and a 2.01 acre parcel for commercial development. A total of 200 residential units would be on the site. The property is zoned S -R (Suburban Residential) and is located on the south side of East Eaton Road and on the west side of Burnap Avenue, Chico. (SB) DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential 1. ADDlication submitted: "1/4/05 Amount: $1,531.00 Receipt # 419041 ; Photocopy of deposit check received 2. Comments (sent to / recEived from): .3. Staff Report (date / prepared by): ❑ Staff Report in file 4. Published: (date / specify where) ❑ Hearing Notice, if published 5. AffC Commission Hearing(s): Agenda Action taken: ❑ Found to be Consistent ❑ Found to be Inconsistent Notes/Special Conditions: s 6. ❑ Minutes CLOSED FILES: ; ❑ Billed out $ date ❑ Received Check Amount: $ Receipt it ❑ Sent them Refund or ❑ Check box if County-initiated—"Exempt from fees" K:\Planning\ALUC\BILLINGS\PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET.doe . : u LOCATION: Don Scott/Steve Schuster, Butte County Airport Land Use Commission consistency review of the Tuscan Village Subdivision Vesting Tentative Map, to divide a 19 -acre parcel into 99 mixed use parcels (ranging in size from 3,500 to 12,562 square feet) and a 2.01 acre parcel for commercial development. A total of 200 residential units would be on the site. The property is zoned S -R (Suburban Residential) and is located on the south side of East Eaton Road and on the west side of Burnap Avenue, Chico. (SB) DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential 1. ADDlication submitted: "1/4/05 Amount: $1,531.00 Receipt # 419041 ; Photocopy of deposit check received 2. Comments (sent to / recEived from): .3. Staff Report (date / prepared by): ❑ Staff Report in file 4. Published: (date / specify where) ❑ Hearing Notice, if published 5. AffC Commission Hearing(s): Agenda Action taken: ❑ Found to be Consistent ❑ Found to be Inconsistent Notes/Special Conditions: s 6. ❑ Minutes CLOSED FILES: ; ❑ Billed out $ date ❑ Received Check Amount: $ Receipt it ❑ Sent them Refund or ❑ Check box if County-initiated—"Exempt from fees" K:\Planning\ALUC\BILLINGS\PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET.doe Tuesday, January 04, 2005- Development Services PLANNING DIVISION Ver. 1.0 Counter $0.00 (General Fund) I Person Chris Public Works Payment Date 1/4/2005 $0.00 419041 Receipt Number CDF (Fire De Scott, Don; Schuster, Steve' Received From $0.00 Same Applicant Aunt Minnie A 05-10 Application Number or In Reference To Planning Review EIR $0.00 ... . ..... ..... .07-190-022 Parcel Number Check # Check Number Cash Total'Received $1,53_1_.00 Total Fees $1,531...00 DDS Planning $0.00 (General Fund) $1,531.00 $0.00 Non Sufficient Funds ($25.00 Fee) Public Works $0.00 (Land Development) $0.00 Environmental $0.00 CDF (Fire De $0.00 NOD / NOE $0.00 (Recording Fee) Aunt Minnie $0.00 $1, 500 or $2,000 Planning Review EIR $0.00 ... . ..... ..... Fish/Game $0.00 ALUC (Airport Land Use) $1,531.00 $0.00 Non Sufficient Funds ($25.00 Fee) 1Cell Tower ($2500.00) $0.00 Public Sales7C5opies $0.00 Other: $0.00 E 0 COUNTY OF BUTTE 419 0 41 OFFICIAL RECEIPT �OFFI OR DIPARTMENT ISSUING RECEIPT 'i� �' 20 Received from `.� .. ' j9-14 p , s The Sum of �� l�.`rtsA�li � ���1� fGt=���.l�fr�a For A ' ' 0 � n A4, Received: Received By - CASH ❑ Title"- �- CHECK®' . By DAVCO BUSINESS FORMS • (530) 743-8511 Form 75702 \ • E TOTAL 3,077.00 APPROVED .BY: RECEIVED By: AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER By write=treaau'rer pink=auditar canary=depositor golden rod=fiile C COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICAIEARID TREASURER'S RECEIPT . . aROV1LLE, CA ATR NO • 80964 RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BAG: 316 DATE fil�fZ�4B5 FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE -CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE:: 115 RECEIPTS:, _419=-919041 .O._T_.ALUC,PiANNiNe' GENL 0010 440MI 4617241 101001 3,052.00 Proje@t Number Amount of Fee APN:01M1M28TOM PROVOST.COI'IST'.A -Q9.,. _ - �_ __ . ,, 'APT�:00T-190- 22 D SCOMS HUSTE!d A10540 1,°131.4#0 DOC G®PYISALES' ENL 0010 44 11 4711910 101w1 15.00 TOTAL 3,077.00 APPROVED .BY: RECEIVED By: AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER By write=treaau'rer pink=auditar canary=depositor golden rod=fiile C II COUNTY OF BUTTE 419 0 41 „Y PT OFFICIAL RECEI Received from _ The Sum of D�t Received: CASH CHECK ING RECEIPT Received Byr`s'-- Title 2�:• y ? By ... • • COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICArtt AND TREASURER'S RECENT OROVILLE, C4 ATR NO 80964. RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BAG:. 3 6 DATE 91 2 0 tJND FUND . DEPT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TTLE CODE .CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: 115 RECEIPTS: 419033-419849 10,0.T.-AL66 PLANNING. GENL 0010 44MO1 4617241 101001 3,OM.00 Project Amount of Fee APN:018-010-028 TOM PROVOST CL74ST .j 5-09 ?� PN: 7 -190 -OM O SCOTTIS SCHUSTER A 05-40 ' Y$1,Ti31.4,K1 DOC COPYISALES' CENL 0010 440C11 4711910 101001 13.00 TOTAL 3,077.00 APPROVED _ RECEIVED BY.. AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER By: G " �C__. ' ='tea.... F7• �... white-taeasurer pink=auditcr canary=depositor golden rvd=fiile r/C-J irj. � '... - y, . """:�., � '_'."""� .•�-.��,sfi."�'`.fi'..�b., ..._. f. � ..`w`...-w'a:."`�"•".�.....-. w.—r-�. �-n. ..tc.,,,�,.� � ,Tuesday,January' 04;'200 i� riDevelo mentServrces":. PLANNING DIVISION - a _ Counter Person :Chris Payment Date 1/4/2005 Receipt Number 419041 i Received From Scott, Don; Schuster, Steve: ALUC'$1,531.00 'Same Applicant '. $0.00 CDF (Fire Department) $0.00 Application Number: A 05-10 or In Reference To . Aunt Minnie $0.00 $1, 500 or $2,000 Planning Review / EIR . $0.00 Parcel Number 07-190-022 t Check Number /Gash 'Check # }}Total Received; , $1 "531.00 i ` Totah Fees LL,§'531.00,T DDS Planning (General Fund) $0.00 ALUC'$1,531.00 Public Works i $0.00 (Land Development) Envirnnmpntal $0.00 (Airport Land �Use) • $0.00 CDF (Fire Department) $0.00 NOD / NOE (Recording. Fee); $0.00 Aunt Minnie $0.00 $1, 500 or $2,000 Planning Review / EIR . $0.00 Fish/Game $0.00 ALUC'$1,531.00 (Airport Land �Use) • $0.00 Non Sufficient Funds :; -($25.00 Fee) Tower $0.00 1Cell ($2500.00) Public Sales'/ Copies $0.00 Other: z: $0.00; • • Received from The Sum of_t Received: CASH E] - CHECK COUNTY OF BUTTE !OFFICIAL RECEIPT r -, ,r �'� Received By C1t Title" . By DAVCO BUSINESS FORMS • (530) 743-8511 Form 75702 419041 � 0 • 4 t ,,v a ram �APPL,I�CA�TION 4�a�:viu:#a�+c N = x®$RT µ A "S ' ®M ISSIOO�N G A=Q , � � ��� { • r •Indeniificat on'No. ERS D VES VtI®R E � ��65X�� $ yyt MR, �"t.�i„y-��0ggg„, d ) -� 11t 'P •.tl 9 uur �. + + • • F"i 1 ' _.r•4"'�i !71i ` �*.. 1 _.TM �,. �� A ”©� -�o , �'�4� ' i ' � .t 1 �a�`�:iv ii '� « ' t 1'�yp'' 'Aye. 5r;.,yy + B• / / r ., -erv�r;;h' jto.� �... �4 „'YMY �;,.5ROJE c' TuPRO:PONE�T�T� 4T�0-BE�C.OMPLETED B' APAPI AN9T' ��. ri.,w'�'yn:. , .:rt 1 - ...'Ni. .. 't,�;atP,.2.. .8..'.:vi4�}Qk:.W..k: Sesit?ahi.F.'�.c �StP;'��`a•xv,YE!-i•:t--�cniYls>22?],:1!..-!3c::.`(_Sy.AFF..'"wi��.x".'�a:4!4ah+`�x'�SsRF,v'�r.'."�'�atSc'�dvabdl:ltis`we»!n: ,i¢ .; y .. R.. -y;... .�•.� ..� •�.!�,IN� 5.�. :rap�..n5 _•1'�i�,.3Y-+Vdr?'s. v Date of Application "7 Property Owner, .,, (� Phone,' , i Number c�`q�/'�'!.�! t M-ailmg�'Addre'ss ►}-Cc�►vST - - a r 1 {f! � � - �i ; �4i.fie x�...� _ } J ,•�k ' _ -.M_! • i - Agerit,(if Phone Number an Y) Y. • Mailing Address ',' Y• _ s ..1�h`in .°�.+r•�^,r a4 v.x�e+.wr mow.. _.,<a +w. :P«:,'vvr,y'#�°a.'.'S•''«hv�w" �.«"aG ;:>,-r.;qu+".I'.n414'r31Exa;s.4A3Ns."'.'f4a W$�49;sfiNJklx--'a5'°4. x 'y ..� �:. rry l x�MX P"R�OJE yT0L'OO C�ATIsONTO BEC®MPLE tEflD BYaAPPLICAbNT) + a ��- �� •��,„�.aY ... r - s•.g„+4 �I � tl�4' - n 3' i - " - . ,,.a � y�� �r q y ER - s � �C } .,��e�i, � �� Ce, fn �} M^, .per 1. MI is ��h a:T:i+'3t1+.._=f'�:�l. i."i� �1�.`. ': t•%.. .,crt�R. i 1�.T "t N..' `A+ttach„2�4raccurately,5scaled mcs,sho�wzng threla'tzonshz; 1n41 �.4yR •^•. .•.fit i},.- .-F 'ff�..:w•, vlp:•rp"' othepro��ectszte toYthe�azrpo�rtboundaryand r�unyways. Street }. R. M� 4 .♦ h k 4 Address _ %iV_C�,f �; +- - , p -i No C� Parcel Size Assessor's Parcel --- 'y v . .M- Subdivision Name: l�C,D►` :1r (' ,; EC,N�c` Zoning: ., 6UTTE ,. .. K. CpOUNT E �d�,;� �}liliS101d � Of7OV��G C�j�� ,06AV S "i+i'VI4JE(�'t �f i i"M.. + ;T _. �F r �.. .. c d rh { _. - t al t mxtt4 '; u. •� i,. t �' }. t f }•G`.,;d.y�.r l� +d rin tvi� r.,; '! y*, �'•! PROJECT DESCRIPTION (TQBE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT y�x k �,�;}o, � ?�,k Tis a d rRd r.;•r.ra ,t,: �: Y•" ..t 5�1 �n,.i, FGr, s�." )+ 3'k �l �.xr.,�', N G, a fi�< a sig -.a., +j 3..•..' �_' r t "s"F ..`tr.; h. u - +.H"�=."^ R .k A,:i • SS r''� x'k . t • i '7A'1t°' :c•�`.:..1y "••" r_ 5'.�r`s^.`•.Ca *'`:W. 4. 9 �{t.. �::� be }�1 1f Y, e31'" £ �u,r,"- i tS �i a ,ix, t .+` ' .'. x Vi e. iRt,p.... '1,. .: e,- 5 �.�.•, `2,;;u s f t}' 9" ars'.i>-`4i'r7+6 1 •ro+./a''&AL r .�. � � F*l.Y',Y 2f•er�i�l'S,I�`>;. LS.... >w. eS �.., �ye�' 1 7 -;; •.,at� .... � �,i� �,:,xa ,.�„ 1 ..�� s ���" � ;e� �i,. x ��,,;5 "•�'�r"f �"th.cus.�,Js!..:•� w�crak;�,� •�ayx�3' •.�'�f.�e�,xt•�'t�.t� .:�.. cable,rattach a detaried site �7lanahowzng round elevations; th,e!location o structures, ;open's aces, a t:r•`f. Y.�. Fs. ... .�r....rA3n a•c.I Fe.N"+ : ? ,�.r.t.,"+r »,3.:!Stdam,—;•:,"•� water;,bodies <and:•the,;height'o aEructu stand trees ncludetadditional+projectudescrtptionEdataasneeded_f} , Existing Land Use (describe) Proposed Land Use { (describe)►rr%Arm 9ArMlrirtfL' � For Residential Uses: Number of Parcels or Units on Site (including secondary units) For Other Land Uses: Hours c -f Use: Maximum -number of people cn site: Indicaie the method used to determine this number (i.e. Church membership, number of parking spaces, etc.) .` • - . ,.. . I ' ltd ' Height Data: -Height above Ground of Tallest Object'(iincluding antennas & trees) ft' Highest Elevation (above sea level) of Any Object or Terrain on Site Flight Hazards: Does the pro'ect involve any characteristics:which could create Electrical interference, confusing lights, glare, smoke, or other Electrical orvisualhazards =' _ f to aircraft flight? Oyes lVo Does the �project have the potential for attracting birds? 0 Yes.No If yes to either, explain below: ~ _ RECEIVED �lJni .n z, 2ee4� OU I It UUUNI l PLANNING DIVISION ORQVII IF rnl 1CQ0K11A REFERRIN.G4AGENC�4�TOfBECOIVIPLETEDIrBY ." i v... s.z?W:z.x�y ;, ;'jx k.; •4. .� s .�o;,.JL+ir,t.:.14�' >.�:.,,•+.�1.3'? :°3.•r,.t ZR",.rtc.YKYar.+1' ..��C't � A�'�fln�s Date Received Type of project: ; Agency Name- ❑ General Plan Amendment El Zoning -Amend,Variance,Rezone Subdivision Approval, -.4 . Staff Contact = - ❑ Use Permit ' ❑ Public Facility Phone Number ❑ Other t• Agency's, Pro' Project No. J . � f `�^,i ' ,, .. � ' • • ' ,+ . � t, ., u. �'• _'+ `�. r . tel, t• i - 4, Signature' Date (Applicant Or A ent) w 'T _: le:. :rs°tu tai• .i��•.,�3'+�`; 4S�+s�, XY _ - '�•�+�'" v�i'ri�7F; _, Z �: �£ 'L�,w «_ �.°�tlf:�- ..: .,'•t#��. _ K:\Planning\AL.UC\FORMS\APPFORM.kVPD a •'ter � r • JAN t0j>. [UiJS BUTTE COUN t `HrRA NI?JG DIVISION . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA ' ., , • .