Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout015-070-007 (2)ON DESIGN, ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 829 De La Vina Street, Suite 200, Santa Barbara, CA_ 93101 Mailing Address:. P.O. Box 489, Santa Barbara, CA 93102 PH: (805) 564-3354 FAX: (805) 962-3904. Facsimile Cover Sheet Date:. June 18, 2007 Project: Addition to Senior Facility To: Mark Michelena ❑ urgent. Company: ,Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ❑ for your review Phone: (530) 538-7376 ❑ reply ASAP ' Fax: (530) 538-7601 ❑ please comment From: Noah Greer, Project Manager Phone: (805) 896-7896 Regarding: 966 Kovak Court Proposed Expansion of Existing Senior Facili-.y APN: 015-070-007, A06-04 cc: Number of Pages including this cover sheet: 2 Comments: Hi Mark, I'm working with the owner of a property in Chico to expand the existing senior facility on her property at 966 Kovak Court. ALUC reviewed an earlier proposal at this site on October 1.5, 2003. Following the ALUC's initial review of the project, the scope of work has been significantly reduced. The ALUC's original conditions (attached) state that "4. The existing Use Pernit for the Assisted Living Facility (APN: 015-070-007) shall encompass only proposed parcel 4 and not expand to proposed parcels 1, 2and 3." The project no Ionger involves a lot split and will only include the addition of two to four independent senior units on the grounds of the existing facility (see the attached conceptual site plan). My question is this: Would there be a concern with the additional two to four units on the existing site? KACommen:iaACountry HousemanningTax IDA LUC -New project.doe Jun 12 07 bG:04p • • p.2 Butte County Department of Development Services OTT TIM S\rLLi iCS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR o� �; �o 0 ; C --� 7 County Ce Apr Drive Oroville, CA 95965 o (530) 538-7611 Telephone (530) 538-77 15 Facsimile �DUN�y ADI1•IINISTR•ATION t BUILDING * PLANNING January 23. 2006 z Lynette D( renzo Bidwell Srtlior Care Services, 966.Kovak Court Chico, CA 95973 Re: A064 4, AP: 015-070-007 Dear Ms. l )orenzo:, _ On Octobe 15, 2003, the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) found the referenced project to be consistent subject to I ie following conditions: 1. Pr wide a deed notice for the existing parcel notifying purchasers of the proximity of the airport and thy: potential for possible noise--Tclated impacts in an ALUC-approved disclosure notice. . 2. Airspace review by the.Airport Land Use Commission. required for objects greater than 70 feet tall .3. A' I dwellings shall be designed and constructed to achieve a maximum interior noise level of 45 dB C 4EL or below_ 4. Pr.or to the issuance of building permits, record an Avigation Easement granting the right of continued use of the airspace above the proposed parcels by the Chico Municipal Airport, and ac cnowledging any and all existing or potential airport operational impacts. �. TI a existing Use Permit for the Assisted Living Facility (APN 015-070-007 shall encompass only, pr )posed parcel 4 and riot expand to proposed parcels 1, 2 and 3. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact of this office at 538-, between 8:00 8-m. and 4:00 F .m„ Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn R.iclardson Commi§si rn Clerk cc: .N )Ith Star Engineering C ty of Chico K:%IettcrsM. rge Ietters�SCHEDULE.dot Butte County Department of Development Services �uT TF TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR O O O O 7 County Center Drive O O Oroville, CA 95965 O O (530) 538-7601 Telephone O—• -�` (530) 538-7785 Facsimile Q'� c UN.y ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * PLANNING January 23, 2006 . Lynette Dorenzo. Bidwell Senior -Care Services, 966 Kovak Court Chico, CA 95973 Re: A06-04, ' AP: 015-070-007 Dear Ms. Dorenzo: On October 15, 2003, the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) found the referenced project to be consistent . subject to the following conditions: 1. Provide a deed.notice for the existing parcel notifying purchasers of the pr•)ximity of the airport and the potential for possible noise -related impacts in an ALUC-approved disclosure notice. 2. Airspace review by the Airport Land Use Commission required for object; greater than. 70 feet tall. 3. All dwellings shall be designed and'constructed to achieve a maximum inlerior noise level of 45 dB CNEL or below. 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits, record an Avigation Easement gxanting the right of continued use of the airspace above the proposed parcels by the Chico Municipal Airport, and acknowledging any and all existing or potential airport operational impac-s. 5. The existing Use Permit for the Assisted Living Facility (APN 015-070-C-07) shall encompass only proposed. parcel 4 and not expand to proposed parcels 1, 2 and 3. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact of this office at 538-, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Commission Clerk cc: North Star Engineering City of Chico . K:\letters\merge letters\SCHEDULE.dot Butte County Department of Development'Services Planning Division Airport Land Use Commission January 18, 2006, ALUC Meeting AGENDA ITEM — TO: Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: Mark Michelena, Senior Planner DATE: January 19, 2006 ITEM: ALUC File No A 06-04 — Lynette Dorenzo, APN 015-070-007: A consistency review for a proposed addition of three multi -family dwellings (3 Triplexes), one -each to be placed on three newly created parcels. The fourth parcel will include the existing Assisted Living Facility. The property is within the Extended Approach/Departure Zone `B2" of the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport. The project site is located at the end of Kovak Court; approximately 450 feet east of Cohasset Road, in the City of Chico. SUMMARY: Staff recommends that ALUC find the project consistent with the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport. "BACKGROUND: • The property is approximately 1.75 acres in size and is developed with a 7,300 squarefoot care facility., • The property is within the I incorporated limits of the City of Chico. The project site is. designated Low Density Residential on the City of Chico General Plan Diagram and is zoned R-2 (Medium Density Residential). • Existing land uses within 500 feet of the project site include professional offices, fire station, ,church, multi -family and single family residential dwellings. • A four lot parcel map is proposed. Three of the parcels are .proposed for triplexes and the fourth parcel includes the existing Assisted Living Facility. The project density/intensity would be approximately: Parcel 1-12.0 du/ac (3du/0.25ac) Parcel 2 — 9.7 du/ac (3du/0.31ac) Parcel 3 =12.0 du/ac (3du/0.25ac) Butte County Airport Land Use Commission . ALUC File No. A 06-04 Dorenzo . January 18, 2006. Page 1 of 9 . Parcel 4 (Existing Care Facility) — 22 people/ac (20 people/0.94 acres) • The tallest object would be 60 feet above ground. ANALYSIS: • This project is 'a'major land use action, five or more dwelling units, as defined by Policy 1.5.3 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). • The project site lies within Airport Compatibility Zone `B2" (Extended Approach/Departure Zone). • The primary compatibility criteria for the `B2" Airport Compatibility Gone are shown on the following table: Compatibility Zone Criteria Maximum Densities/Intensities Zone Open Prohibited Uses ° Other Development Other Uses (people/ac) Land Conditions Residential Single with du/ac l Avgb Acre' Bonus8 Children's Minimum NLR* of 25 schools, day care dB in residences B2 < 0.2 center, libraries, (including mobile (Extended — (average hospitals, nursing homes) and buildings Approach/ Parcel size 50 100 130 20% homes, highly with noise sensitive Departure > 5.0 acres) noise -sensitive issues, airspace Zone) uses, hazards to review for objects>70 flight feet tall, deed notice required Extract from Table 2A of the 2000 ALUCP *NLR - Noise Level Reduction Note 1. Residential development should not contain more than the indicated number of dwelling units (both primary and secondary) per gross acre. With clustering, some parcels may be much smaller than the others as long as the maximum overall density criterion is not exceeded. Clustering of units is encouraged in Compatibility Zones B2 and C — see Policy 4.2.6 for limitations. 4. The uses listed here are ones which are explicitly prohibited regardless of whether they meet the intensity criteria, unless such prohibition is precluded by applicable state statutes. In addition to these explicitly prohibited uses, other uses will normally not be permitted in the respect compatibility zones because they no not meet the usage intensity criteria., 5. Airport proximity and the potential for aircraft overflights should be disclo-3ed as part of all real estate transactions involving property within any of the airport influence area zones. Easement dedication and deed notice requirements apply only to new development. 6. The total number of people permitted on a project site at any given time, except rare special events, must not exceed the indicated usage intensity times the gross acreage of the site. Rare special events are ones (such as an air show at an airport) for which a facility is not designated and normally not used and or which extra safety precautions can be taken as appropriate. . Butte County Airport Land Use Commission . ALUC File No. A C6-04 Dorenzo . . January 18; 2006 . Page 2 of 9 . c 9. Hazards to flight include physical (e.g., tall objects), visual, and electronic farms of interference with the safety of aircraft operations. Land use development which may cause the attraction of birds to increase is also prohibited. See the supporting compatibility policies on airspace protection (Policies 4.32 and 4.3.6) for details. • The project site is approximately 775 feet west of the extended centerline of Runway 31R/13L of the Chico Municipal Airport, and a distance of 1.2 miles southwest this runway. • Section 4.1.3 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan states that the maximum noise level for residential uses in the vicinity of an airport is. 55 dB CNEL, except for the area south of the Chico Municipal Airport, where a 60 dB CNEL noise maximum is acceptable. • The project site is within the 55 dB CNEL noise contour as shown on Exhibit 4E (Noise Impacts — Future Average Fire Season Day) and Exhibit 4F (Noise Impacts — Expanded Forecast) and is within the 60 dB CNEL noise contour as shown on Exhibit 4G (Noise Impacts — Peak Fire Attack Day) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. • Pursuant to Section 4.1.5(a) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, staff recommends that all dwellings on the project site be designed and constructed to achieve a maximum interior noise level of 45 dB CNEL. • The proposed single-family subdivision qualifies as infill development pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act. • The project site meets the criteria for infill development of Section ZAA(a)(3) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan based on the following: • The parcel is 5 acres or less in size (1.75 acres); • Qualifies as infill development pursuant to Section 153--•2 of the California Environmental Quality Act; and • The density of the Parcels 1, 2 and 3 are 12.0, 9.7 and 12.0 respectively, which is less than the highest density within 500 feet of the project site (a multi -family development [6 units] on a 0.49 acre parcel [12.2 du/ac], locaa_ed west of the project site [APN 015-070-005]). • Parcel 4 includes the existing Assisted Living Facility. The facility hZs at most 16 residents and 4 staff members at any given time. The `B2" zone allows Lp to 50 per acre for nonresidential uses. Parcel 4 is approximately 0.94 acres. The maximum intensity proposed would be 22 people (20 people/0.94 acres). Parcel 4 would be consistent. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: No environmental documentation has been completed for this project by ALUC staff. The City of Chico staff will make a determination per the California Environmental Quality Act as part of their processing of the apartment complex expansion. It is expected that a Class 32 categorical exemption for in -fill development (Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines) will be the environmental determination for the new apartments. . Butte County Airport Land Use Commission . ALUC File No. A 06-04 Dorenzo . . January 18, 2006 . Page 3 of 9 . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission find ALUC File No. A 06-04 (Dorenzo Parcel Map, Parcels 1, 2 and 3 - triplex development) consistent with the infill development policy Section 2.4.4 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility?Ian and Parcel 4 consistent with the Extended Approach/Departure Zone `B2". . Exhibits: A: Findings B: List of References C: Project Location and Compatibility Zone Map D: Adopted City of Chico Airport Infill Map — Chico Municipal Airport E: Site Plan kAplanning\aluc\aluc applications\2005 files\06-04 dorenzo\dorenzo agenda report a06-04.doc ' d 4 r s . Butte County Airport Land Use Commission . ALUC File No. A 06-04 Dorenzo M. . January 18, 2006 . Page 4 of 9 . 3 � R EXHIBIT A BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION . CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR ALUC File No. A 06-04 — Lynette Dorenzo, ` APN 015-070-007: t The Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) has prepared the following findings based on data contained in•the 2000 Butte County AirportLand Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP), as well as site specific information submitted by the applicant and ALUC staff. ' The following findings have been prepared at the direction of- the ALUC and are .for the consideration of the Lead Agency (City of Chico) when making a decision on the project.: SECTION 1: ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS A. No environmental documentation has been completed for this project by ALUC staff. The City of Chico staff will make a determination per the California Environmental ,Quality Act as part of their processing of the apartment complex expansion. SECTION 2: CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT A. The proposal for the Lynette Dorenzo Parcel Map will divide a 1.75 acre parcel into four parcels. Three of the parcels will'have a triplex. The fourth parcel will - t ' have the existing assisted living care facility which will resLlt in densities of 12.0, 9.7 and 12.0 dwelling units per.acre on Parcels 1, 2 and 3 respectively, which is consistent with the infill development criteria of Section 2.4.4(a)(3) of *the 2000 F Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. ' B. j�: The Assisted Living Facility is an existing use and will meet the required intensity use on average of 50 people per acre. The proposed parcel size is approximately . • 0.94 acres with a total of 20 people on site. The average intensity "average would be 22 people/acre (20 people/0.94 acres). SECTION'3:' PROJECT FINDINGS: A..' The project site meets the criteria for infill development of Section 2.4.4(a)(3) because: 1. ' The project site is,5 acres or less in size .° 2. The subdivision project qualifies as infill development pursuant to the , :L California Environmental Quality Act ` 3. The projects .residential parcels densities (12.0, 9 -7 -and 12.0 units per, acre), would be less than the density of the highest existing residential development within 500 feet of the project site, which is 12.2 .units per acre. r .Butte County Airport Land Use Commission . ALUC File No. A 06-04 Dorenzo . January 18, 2006. Page 5 of 9 4. The project site is shown on the City of Chico's inf_ll development map, as approved by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission on March 16, 2005. B. The projects nonresidential parcels intensity (22 people/ac) is consistent with the Extended Approach/Departure Zone "B2" (50 people/acre). C. No structures on the project site would extend into protected airspace. D. All new dwellings on the project are required to be design -.d and constructed, to have a maximum interior noise level of 45 dB CNEL or less in order to prevent significant aircraft -related noise impacts. SECTION 4: PROJECT CONDITIONS: 1. Provide a deed notice for the existing parcel notifying purchasers of the proximity of the airport and the potential for possible noise -related =mpacts in an ALUC- approved disclosure notice. 2. Airspace review by the Airport Land Use Commission requ_red for objects greater than 70 feet tall. 3. All dwellings shall be designed and constructed to achieve a maximum interior noise level of 45 dB CNEL or below. 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits, record an Avigation Easement granting the right of continued use of the airspace above the proposed parcels by the Chico Municipal Airport, and acknowledging any and all existing -or potential airport operational impacts. . Butte County Airport Land Use Commission . ALUC File No. A- 06-04 Dorenzo . . January 18, 2006. Page 6 of 9 . EXHIBIT C Proiect Location and Compatibility Zone Map .r . Butte County Airport Land Use Commission . ALUC File No. A 06-04 Dorenzo . January 18, 2006. Page 8 of 9 . 9I'im "DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: 04- (9 ` AP# (9/,T=. o %!> Oo `7 APPLICANT: 4--Gi/144F17`F D OWNER: Lv�� REPRESENTATIVE: IVe�7�i�G��2�%Lc3S� PROPOSED REQUEST: (to be filled out by person taking in application) FINAL REQUEST: (to be filled out by project planner) n }} .(,. . (c v f A,4, 1/(]. Kctl- PP,. b,�'D!4_ 1-1 inAl,l9./o � A C 4 vi I rn r -,,%l Ora,,(, Q SIZE: l 7 s LOCATION:, XaV4-jt cam,, y• J5QE A -#Sr o.-- e if g-s•Sp- r 6-r /07ce--) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT # EXISTING ONING: o cfcO ��X/ GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: fT' ASSIGNED PLANNER: /' ► /'I /L-�1 PLANNER'S INITIALS¢j���=1 Date Application Received ILIOV Date Proiect Assigned II IOS IDR Date �- 30 Day Complete PikBUE 1911Zat►OV NOUN Tentative Hearin Date ZQflS -48VEL iPMENT K:\Planninfforms\Lead In Sheet.doc SERVICES MUM Sim 01111110- min Lin !LIN m m! BUTTE END OF KOVAK COURT COUNTY NOV -12 2005 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Mrtheftir Civil Engineers..Surveyors Chico, California .p- 20 Declaralion -3 Chto, (:V:for111" 959., F -ox: (5,30) 893-211, Wla-b Site: =1= =0 Job Number sari LOCATION MAP 10-12-2005 st" -1 of 24 0'— 5.0 5g NEW ,TRIF LEX_. . x 2.800',SF ON 9,927 SF LOT x I €ft80J i 1 4j,9O'SF Nrw T LEX CANDSCA E I SF ON ' 27:5 3.0's 8S3 SF LOT I - ' IM ,� 7 2 SF 5s70 N CAPE 40.0, -350 24.3' I' °.1 S 0 Yil:1n4 Y a,. ?' I:, .//GARAGE k 1/ 600 SO F� ' / / �`. ,n s xi ME i I 11 X i I C) EXISTING CARE FACILITY 7300- / �V " 11 p SQ FT' BUILDING ON ON. A,41,410 SO FT LOT Fil m ` AND 17,570 SF LANDSCAPE/ +' 11V 11 ,,.E g. I� II' I F� . i't +• \ `� %®'/- ' o t / . tN W I I' E. TRIPLEX / + ! I 2.800 SF ON 1 i j t I 10.960' SF LOT 14 4:768 SF LANDSCAPE � Y KOV,AK �Ck)URT, (PRIVATE)F1 �R2°•.0'' j .� ( I' .0 c, �•,�' + r COUNVY 1 n 2 2005 r DEVELOPI6�EPd'� Civil Engineers..Surveyors Chico,California,LYNEITE DORENZO; SITE PLAN `'r` `m'b"r` , 2 W6 KOVAK COURT ,NEW APART AI§ Tft u Tiro, CaI f0rl',;6' ?5Y. � ,i f G 15301893 ' c� ax 8,3;2 BU 1 1 , .Ci i1 Job Mmtber 8C81e" � Date:' 10-12-'2005 IAPN#048-400-007 842 1� Yet . SheM 1101t *� -,_f % !i. ' FAR NORTH REGIONAL CENTER 2.05 ACRES �" 20 ACRES 68 SFH 3.4 'HOUSES/ACRE r �o SHEPARD LAW OFFICE _,2.20 ACRES- PROPOSED PROPOSED � 0.31 ACRES-7-3 UNITS _ 9.25 ACRES-3 UNITS, '9*7'UNITS/ACRE 12.0 UNITS/ACRE. _ J Nt ti it 0.34• ACRES I to PROPOSED '0.25 ACRES-3 UNITS A 4SITING ASSISTED-LIVING . 12.0,'UNITS/ACRE. INTERWEST AND GOLD STEPWEB 4 ACRES A 3.12 ACRES N C si.-E AAMG, EXISTI 0 0.49 ACRES :I El 4.02 ACRES-8 SFH'29 Yj 0.49 AC'RES-6 -UNITS 2'0 HOUSES/ACRE 12.2 UNITS/ACRE, 0.49 ACRES-t6-UNITS 12:2 UNITS/ACRE iVt 0:49 ACRES NITS -6_U 2 12 2. 4' Q�?Z 0N`iTS/ACkE 1-" - ----­------- r-7) 0:44,ACRES 1 SFA LIVING) (OFFICE *BUILDING - PRE GE (ASSISTED 0 .49 jA�qhS-265JUNITS A 12.2 UNITS-/ACRE - ATAL MEDICAL DIE �,34FH/ACRE 2.62 ACRES 1 .32 ACRES 2.53/,ACRES / I .57 ACRES-6-UNITS "CENTURY TOO CJO P-\ /* 070 ACRES GRE 10. jUNITSIk /-N 7 51 �4 f 411 EN, \_j N 500' LINE FROM DEVELOPMENT 2 2005 PROPERTY O--- — — EVE fopmw L -- --- --- --- --- --- -- SERVICES ,-J' l DeWwwd Fw PAVWM Dde BY I a w 20 Declaration Drive LYNETTE DORENZO AREA COMPLIANCE Dmwn8p. lvwthSftrl Chico, California 95973 966 KOVAK COURT NEW APARTMENTS Appro-d Civil Engineers..Surveyors Phone: (530) 893-1600 Fax: (530) 893-2113 CHCO, CALFORNIA Job Number r -w Scale NA Sheet i of i Dde >22•« Chico, California Web Site: www.northstareng.com 842 I Hom Vert 0 NorthStar ENGINEERING Civil Engineers. Planners. Surveyors TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FROM: Mark Michelena Ross Simmons COMPANY: DATE: Butte County- Planning Division 10/31/05 10:20 AM ADDRESS: JOB NUMBER: 7 County Center Drive 95965 8412 PROJECT: TRANSMITTING THE FOLLOWING: Dorenzo - Appartment Project ALUC application, fees, maps ❑ URGENT FOR REVIEW ❑ PLEASE COMMENT El PLEASE REPLY D PLEASE RECYCLE Q FOR APPROVAL ❑ FOR CHECKING ❑ FOR YOUR FILES ❑✓ 4S REQUESTED NOTES / COMMENTS Mark, Attached is the ALUC application, fees $1,531, and 20 copies of the site and vicinity maps. This will be this projects 2nd attempt at passing ALUC, back in 2004 it was denied because ALUC had no definition for "Infill" at the time. Since the the City of Chico has identified infill parcels, hers is infill parcel #7 on the attached map. Her proposed density is below the rest of Kovak court's densities thus qaulifing the project per the attacehd highlighted sections of the ALUC policy 2.4.4 Specail Conditions. Please process, if you have any questions or need clarification give me a call at 0893-1600. Greg Redeker at the City is also avaliable to answer questions 879-6810. Sincerely RossSimmons NorthStar Engineering *' * PLEASE COPY TO YOUR FILES _ ...... ...._......._..... .. ........ ...... ......... - 20 DECLARATION DRIVE CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 530-893-1600 FAX -893-2113 Im � Thursday,' November om.0000. ����enKServices P ' CounterDDS Planning �O$0.00��Chris| ������J r�'�� ' | ------ Payment Date 11/2/28005 |Public Works $Ol0 ' | ' i | ` ' Receipt Number 440429'Environmental Health | $Ol0* ' ' ' `"z"'L''="eCDF (Fire Department) | $0l0 ! Applicant :Same| NOD NOE �Ol0 ' . . | � | | / ------Aunt Minnie _- —__---- --- ' $0l0Application Number 06-04 �$1, 500 or $2,000| | -or In Reference ToPlanning --- ��-------'---- Review EIR $010 ! Parcel Number i015-070-007 ' | | | ALUC (Airport Land Use) lNon Sufficie Funds ($2 Cell Tower ' -— '- Public Sales | $0.00 | 0 Sk COUNTY OF BU OFFICIAL RECEIPT .440429 I^0Aq OFFICE OR DEPARTMENT ISSUING RECEIPT Received from L. �dt/_,=_. j7" '0 - Z_ Z 20 <Z The Sum. of �� 1h�c..�fl�l0 F�ccr • For �• I . Received: Received By Ci�•r Zt�e G y CASH [_j Title i CHECK W4'5y By t DAVCO BUSINESS FORMS • (530) 743-8511 Forth 84702 LYNETTE DORENZCI MONEY MARKET PH -'530-891 8026`. 14126'HEREFORD DR CHICO CA 99973 - - 52441: w" M/yr �� z x 90.3504/1211 �� IWVN I�L�k7�illa� S3/ r co _ t NTIES 1-800 922-8742 ■w,��f` L 1 ° ZZ 233 q. 066529.447 ` d PROJECT'SUMMARY- SHE f FILE #: �A 06-04 AP #: 015-070-007 APPLICANT:, Lynette Dorenzo ADDRESS: - 966 Kovak Court Chico, CA 95973 OWNER: Same REPRESENTATIVE:,, NorthStar Engineering , ADDRESS: 20 Declaration Drive, Chico, CA 95973 PROJECT DESCRIPTION / LOCATION: Lynette Dorenzo ,consistency review for the 2000 CLUP for the Chico Municipal Airport for three tri-plexes .to be added to the existing Assisted Living Facility. The parcel is located in the B2 Compatibility } } Zone, on Kovak Court, 450 feet east of Cohasset Road, in the City of. Chico. (MM) DESIGNATION: . 1. , AnDlication submitted: November 2, 2005 Amount: $1,531.00 Receipt # 440429` Photocopy of deposit check received 2. Comments (sent to / received from): s , 3. Staff Report (date / prepared by): ❑ Staff Report in file 4. Published: (date / specify where), ❑ Hearing Notice, if published , 5. A,LVC Commission Hearing(s): Agenda Action taken: ❑ Found to be Consistent ❑ Found to be Inconsistent. Notes/Special Conditions: b. ❑ Minutes , CLOSED FILES: ❑ Billed out $ date ❑ Received Check + Amount: $ Receipt # -, ❑ Sent them Refund or ❑ Check box if County-initiated—"Exempt from fees" K:\Planning\ALUC\BILLINGS\PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET.doc Check Number / Cash :524 «TotalReceived` ," $1;53100, , Total.Fees k $1,531.00 j Fish/Game $0.00 ALUC $1,531.00 (Airport Land Use)• _ $0.00 Non Sufficient Funds ($25.00 Fee) Cell Tower $0_.00 ($2500.00) z (,,Develo ment Services M Thursday, November 2005 r 'f, ,. p +� ,t . c Y ;, . �. s G S! Ver `1 0 PLA6V IN DIVI ®N rte 4` 4 r s Counter '-- • ---• :Chris j + DDS Planning (General Fund) r T - $0.00 Person �` . , } r `" Payment Date y11/2/2005 '. Public Works $0.00 - m• �. +� (Land Development) • i -' . N' Receipt Number 440429 Environmental Health • $0.00 11 Received From Dorenzo, Lynette CDF (Fire Department) $0.00 NOD / NOE .* $0.00 - Applicant _ • 'Same ', ; (Recording Fee) _ Application Number A 06 t ' Aunt Minnie $1, 500 or $2,000 j .$0.00 or In Reference To.— --- -- — Planning Re=1EIR$0.00 _ _ — Parcel Number a 1015-070-007 _ 1' _ Check Number / Cash :524 «TotalReceived` ," $1;53100, , Total.Fees k $1,531.00 j Fish/Game $0.00 ALUC $1,531.00 (Airport Land Use)• _ $0.00 Non Sufficient Funds ($25.00 Fee) Cell Tower $0_.00 ($2500.00) Public Sales /Copies $0.00 Other: - , - ^ - $O.QQ ._ COUNTY OF BUTTE 440429 OFFICIAL RECEIPT OFFICE OR DEPARTMENT ISSUING RECEIPT A,bV' 20 <Sr Received from The Sum of 2'-/F #A For L o 6 Received: CASH ❑ CHECK DAVCO BUSINESS FORMS • (530) 743.8511 Form Received By���� Title By 0 • l TO . �a � $ EAS WMIII} � �! i • s P 3m. r.��_._�'�`c _ ,��T� �_�-,_ �'�_ r i i a .ate•.. �.�•�' .-_- "-- �_�.3�-•a� �_.s-r•�i__ �'��"-�_c `e � �-; � '�+'a� r3 � m���'� � 5s E ° n�` ��� j��c�� � �1 ��'�€.—•--T'• �2—�"'� - : ....�.. __.- r>.:�:L..:.� �"� - X".� =- -_ - ' - ':��[•�c �.:.-. _ �' :moi: _ ':_:::..., -.:.;...._-..^.�.�.-... �:- �'...__-•_�_- 'St:::>.•==..CC_.Y_-�':�„--tom _ _ _:^21h�J-�-`-��Y_���''��- __ �5�--,.-,. . .._. _. a+,,:^>^.:::: :...::]:•Y.'::: ..._..�y.__ �_%.=C--._64_x- _!••�'s�i-..-.� � _'rr - '�'^:'? .--�':. ^-.i,S_.:r_ _' - _��5:�--�- -�mi'r - �-"3•.�:. _ -�-- _ � ,=.-aa_x. _-'�:�'��•-fix:: :'_'.-�'-� *cc - _ •v -.•-i::,'=_ .::x_ ^c.: ti,--�� _ _ _ ' .:'•c•r �_`:- _ :. it �. Date of Application 10-4-2005 i Property Owner, Lynette Dorenzo Phone Number (530) 342-7002 t , Mailing Address `. Bidwell Senior Care Services ' C/O Lynette Dorenzo , 966 Kovak Court - Chico CA 95973 Agent (if any) . • NorthStar Engineering (Ross Simmons) Phone Number (530) 893=1600 1 -s" Mailing Address, NorthStar Engineering , - . { 20 Declaration Drive , Chico. CA 95973' .......:.... : Fi _ ::.5^_� - Wit^• _ - _ _ - _ - - - ..ai-. -- - �_-..4-.. :. ee: _ _ � _ •ze:^•-- --^ �• ��-Aro- _� - _ - - __ _ so Street Address -Bidwell Senior Care Services 966 Kovak Court s ' Chico CA 95973 Assessor=s Parcel No. 015-070`007 Parcel Size 1.75 Acres = ` Subdivision Name . N/A Zoning Lot Number N/A CIassification Prezoned 22 COt Nre, NOV 2 2005 DEVELi)PM)y1NT 1 SERVICjE6 Oct 05 05 041:57p PO -ROM. DR -0 NW T -Eff VZ Teva io AddP 9: P gr;. �- M1 . A ;49"-fAW Existing Land Use (describe) Currently the property has a single assisted living care facility on it with the approximately I acre remaining undevelopedprimarily open grassland while the areas around . The undeveloped land is L the care facili!y are intensely landscaped with flowers and trees. The existing building and garage is two-story (approx 30' tall). There is at least one large oak tree on site that will be Preserved (height approximated at 601. The neighborhood is mixed use between residential and commercial. Proposed Land Use (describe) The existing Assisted Living facility is to remain while the undeveloped land is to contain 3 triplexes to be used as apartment buildings, all one story construction. (see the attached plans for more detail), For Residential Uses: Nuifiber of Parcels or Units on Site (including secondary units) 4 parcels created from I For Other Land Uses:. Hours of Use: Assisted Living Facility is 24 hours Maximum number of people on site: 29 people max with (4) four in each triplex and the rest in the care facility. Indicate the method Z used to determine this number (i.e. Church membership, number of pzrking spaces, etc.) Current care facility numbers and space indicate the total occupancy. Height Data: Height above Ground of Tallest Object (including antennas & trees) 613 ft. Highest Elevation (above sea level) of Any Object or Terrain on Site -257 ft. X' F Flight Hazards: Does the project involve any characteristics which could create Electrical interference, confusing lights, glare, smoke, or other Electrical or visual hazards to aircraft flight? 0 Yes allo Does the project have the potential for attracting birds? 0 Yes [3No If yes to either, explain below: N/A p. 3. Oct 05 05 04:57p p•4 _ - .... Date Received � 11 or Type of project: Agency Name n -� �' ❑ General Plan Amendment _ ❑ -Zoning'Amendrnent or Variance/ Rezone ❑ Subdivision Approval Staff Contact Cr -2-4 Ae kev- ❑ Use Permit ❑Public Facility Phone Number 10 Other . ��/o Agency=s Project No. Signature Date /0- o r' (Applicant or Agent) - _: �'- --::�...r_ .bra•-"-�" --'- ^s-� �rams.�—r>.-�-__... _'^fi: -=_ K:\Planning\ALUCTORMSIAPPFORM. WPD ALUC Policy 2.4.4 Special Conditions (a) Infill — Where development not in conformance with this Compatibility Plan already exists within Compatibility Zones 62 and C, anal infill development of similar land uses may be allowed to occur even if such land uses are to be prohibited elsewhere in the those zones, under the circumstances described below. Infill development within all :other zones must be in conformance with this Compatibility Plan. This. except,^^ applies only within Compatibility Zones 132 and G. (1) One-time determination of eligibility: To avoid the ripple effect of infill development on some parcels permitting additional parcels subsequently to qualify for infill, the ALUC's intent is that parcels eligible for infill be determined just once. Thus, in order for the ALUC to consider proposed development under these infill criteria, the entity having land use authority (Butte County or affected cities) must first identify the qualifying locations in its general plan or other adopted planning document approved by the ALUC. This action may take place independently, in conjunction with the process of amending a general plan for consistency with the ALUC plan, or may be submitted by the local agency for consideraticn by the ALUC at the time of adoption of the Compatibility Plan. In eithef gny case, the burden for demonstrating that a proposed development qualifies as infill rests with the project proponent and/or affected land use jurisdiction. (2) Criteria for eligibili To qualify for infill development, a parcel shall meet all of the following criteria except as provided below: ➢ The parcel size is no larger than 20 acres ➢ The site is at least 65% bounded (disregarding roads) by existing uses similar to, or more intensive than, those proposed. This requirement does not aDDly to residential dev?loDments that qualify as infill projects as defined in Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Proiects) of the California Environmental Qualitv Act Guidelines ➢ The site is within the perimeter of the area defined by the surrounding, already developed, incompatible uses. BUTT COUINry ➢ F= eF the density, intensity, and!E)F c-ther NOV 0 2. 200 ., thMugh use DEVELO.PNiE11TT , addition of seGORd units on the same RRVICES ,Z f, (relocated, see below) - ➢ The F site has not previously have been set aside as open land in accordance with Policy 4.2.5 unless replacement open land is provided within the same ' compatibility zone. ' (3) Allowable density/intensity of development: The maximum density and/or intensity of development of an approved infill site shall not exceed that described below. Further increases in the density, intensity, and/or other incompatible design or usage characteristics (e.g., through use permits, density transfers, addition, of second units on the same parcel, height variances, or other strategy) are prohibited. For residential development: ➢ If the size of a parcel is 5 acres or less and the development proposed foe that°parcel Qualifies as an infill devel5riment ' project as d`efinedTmSection 15332'(In -NIL 616 Proiects) of'the California Environmental Quality F;ctGuidelines, thenthe develo:ament density may:.be.equal'to b�Ltsialhbe no `". ;greaterAhan-the density that exists on the�most dansely =developed property that•is•Iocated�witliih; 004feet cf:the perimeter of -the parcel: Y u • ➢ If the size of a parcel pFeposed fOF division is greater than 5 acres but not greater than 10 acres, or if the parcel is 5 acres'or less in size but the development proposed does not qualify as an infill development proiect as defined in Section 15332 (in -Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, then the development density shall be no ' greater than the overall density represented by all existing lots which lie fully or partially within a distance of 300 flet from the boundary of the parcel to be divided. _ ➢ If the size of the parcel is greater than 10 acres (but no larger than 20 acres), then the development ' y>- density shall be no greater than double the density permitted in • • accordance with the Primary Compatibility Criteria (Table 2A).• ' For nonresidential development: ` ➢ If the size of the parcel proposed for development is 10 acres or less, the usage intensity (the number of people pe- acre) of the proposed use shall be no greater than the averagE intensity of 4. a - j all existing uses Which lie fully or partially within a distance of 300 feet from the boundary of the proposed development. ➢ If the size of the parcel proposed for development is greater than 10 acres (but no larger than 20 acres), the proposed use shall not have an intensity(the number of people per acre) more than 50% above the intensity permitted in accordance with the Primary Compatibility Criteria (Table 2A). [For example, whereas an average intensity of 50 people per acre is normally permitted in Zone B2, the infill policy would allow a total of 75 people per acre (50 people/acre x 150% = 75 people/acre.] IVAKOGT-fi-IT-6 am A TIMM HE &©� ��, '.`'�i �`,��■ �:�� -,�..� .�.:.. 0 %��111111111I1/�►�1�����i Oii'o��� '••. I - AM e ��,��1,� �� �� ��`� Iiiii�'�11/. d�� -� , ■• X111111111111.: HIM arport ', �� � � :.: /11 III, �II�■ _- 1���� �,,�IIUIIIiiI—a�►�1��!K■`1�M�!l.�1111 'one ,n ts Moll's t Property Vditional sls N Study Area among—we IPP Number F.ble oil IIIII M Boundaries _, 111!/1 ������� , � �®�� ����� ���� ��:� _ , 771 Infill Parcel List for the Chico Municipal Airport Map Area APN Acreage Zoning Maximum allowed density GP assumed or proposed project density Proposed project name/ notes 1 007-250-074 0.98 R1 dna Second unit 1 007-250-075 0.98 R1 dna Second unit 1 007-250-078 1.16 R1 dna Second unit 1 007-250-079 1.04 R1 dna Second unit 1 007-250-081 1.00 R1 dna Second unit 1 007-250-082 0.91 R1 dna Second unit 1 007-250-085 0.63 R1 dna Second unit 1 007-250-086 0.66 R1 dna Second unit 1 007-250-087 0.69 R1 dna Second unit 2 007-150-032 0.90 R1 5.40 3.42 2 007-150-029 1.14 R1 6.84 4.33 2 007-150-028 0.46 R1 2.76 1.75 2 007-150-027 0.46 RI 2.76 1.75 2 007-150-024. 0.50 R1 3.00 1.90 3 007-150-081 0.41 R2 5.74 3.28 3 007-150-045 0.63 R2 8.82 5.04 i 3 007-150-053 2.42 R2. 33.88 19.3.6 3 007-150-017 2.95 R2 41.30 23.60 3. 007-150-012 0.92 R2 12.88 7.36 4 007-150-108 2.28 R2 dna 8.00 2/3 developed 5 007-570-002 0.21 R2 dna 3.00 .Platt triplexes 5 007-570-003 0.27 R2 dna 3.00 Platt triplexes 5 007-570-008 1.23 R2 dna 15.00 Platt triplexes S:\gcr\ALUC\final parcel list.wpd Attachment 1, Page 1 of 4 15 Map. APN_ Acreage Zoning Maximum GP assumed' Proposed Area j allowed or proposed project name/, g . _ density project notes ` n density 5 007-570-012 0.52 R2 7.28 .4.16 - - 6y 007-170-020 0.35 R2 4.90 2.80 6 • 007-170-044 0.54 R2 E 7.56 4.32 6 _ 007-170-060 + 1.25 R3 27.50 21.25 6' 007-290-031. 1.39 R3 dna 10.00 1/2 developed - . gone to DRC ''110.00F'3/4 veloped'- .015070 0 �."�1:75r --.R2-..- .dna `7�- o DRC,Y° 8 ` 015-120-032• 0.67 OR dna -1.00 veloped 8 . 015-120-031 1.55 R1 dna 2.00 1/2 developed 8 015-120-034 - 2.22 OR/R1 13.32 8.44 8.' .015-120-033 2.22 OR/R1 - 13.32 8.44- 8 015-120-037 0.50 OR 11.00 :dna could be offices` 9 { 007-290-040. 1.93 R2 dna dna 2/3 developed ' with church 9 - 007-290-024 0.87 R2 12.18 4.00. 1/2 developed t 10 007-560-009' " 0.51 R1 3.06- 1.94 owner interested + in developing 10. 007-560-010 0.71, R1 4.26 2.70 10 0077560-011 1.49 R1 8.94 5.66 10•. 007=560=012 " 1-.89 R2 26.46 15.12 . 10 007-560-013 1.59 R2 22.26 12.72. = ` 10, 007-120.053 1.29. R2 18.06 10.32 11 • ' 007=0727001 " various . R1 dna 15 second, one second unit' through -01.5 units ' per lot 11 ' .007-073-001 - various R1 dna 15 second one second unit through -015 units per lot.' S:\gcr\ALUC\final parcel list.wpdAttachment 1, Page 2of 4 Map APN Acreage Zoning Maximum GP assumed Proposed Area allowed or proposed project name/ density project notes density 12 015-220-029 1.44 OR/R1 8.64 5.47 a portion could be offices - gone to DRC 12 015-220-033 0.68 R1 4.08 2.58 12 015-220-034 0.63 R1 3.78 2.39 12 015-150-022. 0.58 OR 12.76 dna under -developed site 13 015-220-028 2.06 OR/R1 12.36 7.83 auto dealership - large vacant area 13 015-230-034 2.00 CC dna dna parking for auto dealership 13 015-230-024 1.07 CC dna dna existing business w/ add'l potential 13 015-230-025 1.04 CC dna dna existing business w/ add'l potential 13 015-230-026 1.04. CC dna dna existing business w/ add'l potential 14 015-120-042 0.30 R1 1.8 1.14 14 015-120-049 0.39 R1 dna second unit 14 015-140-024 0.41 R1 dna second unit 14 015-140-025 0.41 R1 dna second unit 14 015-160-031 1.08 R1 dna 3.00 1/2 developed 15 015-160-026, 0.46 R1 2.76 1.75 second unit or -027,-028 two -lot split for each parcel 15 015-160-029 0.46 R1 dna 2.00 .Hughes PM 15 015-150-073 0.52 R1 dna second unit 15 015-150-074 0.32 R1 dna second unit S:\gcr\ALUC\final parcel list.wpd Attachment 1, Page 3 of.4 Map APN Acreage Zoning Maximum GP assumed Proposed Area allowed or proposed project name/ density project notes density 16 015-220-022. 0.43 RI 2.58 1.63 16 015-220-023 1.60 RI 9.60 6.08 16 015-220-035 0.58 R1 3.48 2.20 17 015-240-013, various R1 dna second unit potential for.4 -015,-016, second units -017 18 015-200-055 3.06 R1 6.00 3.80 1.00 acre developable 18 015-200-056 0.39 R1 dna second unit 18 015-200-049 1.20 R1 4.80 3.04 .80 acre developable 18 015-200-057 1.86 R1 8.40 5.32 1.40 acres developable 18 015-200-058 0.59 R1 dna second unit 18 015-200-052 1.20 RI 4.80 3.04 .80 acre developable 18 015-200-053 1.20 R1 3.60 2.28 .60 acre developable 19 015-250-049 4.31 OR/R1 7.50 4.75 church - 1.25 acres developable 19 015-250-044 1.25 R1 dna 8.00 Floral Arrangement Subd. 19 015-250-043 1.25 R1 7.50 4.75 Redevelopment potential 19 015-250-050 0.86' OR dna offices Stometta offices 19 015-250-051 0.91 OR dna offices Stornetta offices 20 007-170-07,1/. 4.20 R3 92.40 76.00 Bumap Gardens 007-170-072 S:\gcr\ALUC\fmal parcel list.wpd Atta-2hment 1, Page 4 of 4