Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
015-250-044
rI OWNER AND SUBDIVIDER: I c FLORAL ARRANGEMENT, INC. -. - i P.O. BOX 617 - - CHICO. CA 95927 ENGINEER: . GILBERT ENGINEERING GRAPHIC SCALE 70 DECLARATION DRIVE, SUITE 101 CHICO, CA 95973 _ (530) 899-9503 .t WESLEY E. -GILBERT, R.C.E. 31689 - " (1 IN tlaur ' 1 Lm0 = 20 :.ft. . ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N0: 1� 015-250-044 LAND USE: PRESENT: VACANT -• ..+_ ". 3 i . _r I• • - -(i 1 1 1 k.l q� FUTURE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL �_ 1 • i I b ZONING: s I tl g I a I, - EXISTING: RI LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL • I _. i',' l PROPOSED: RI LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL b GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: '• EXISTING:LDR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - / QM ' 0011 ( PROPOSED: LOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL pQa I }. 1QN I PQN / P ' v ABUTTER'S'RIGHTS TO THE ; 001 ql ` an OF cH1,, I 111 l I 1, 1, SANITARYT��SEWER• : CITY OF CHICO/CSA 23 �" I S 89D739' W I�71, STORM DRAIN: CITY OF CHICO .. /°'r 4 WATER: CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY _ _ I_ _ S 89'06_38_W _ _ _175.10' _ _ POWER: PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 81 TELECOMMUNICATIONS: SBC GAS PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC. 1 I` CABLE TV: COMCAST i ;J �• •�� C� `�� / I 6t SUBDIVISION NOTES: -5_ I 6 1) SUBDIVISION INFORMATION: 5,4784q. N:' / 5,480 sq. fL 5.566 sq. fL I I TOTAL ACRES = 1.25 ACRES (GROSS) 10 ? I , I • NUMBER OF LOTS = 6 I UNITS PER ACRE 4.8 I I I ' / AVERAGE LOT SIZE 5.575 SI' •` e _ - 14 2) GRADING WILL CONSIST OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF �� ROADWAYS AND OF BUILDINGS PADS TO AVOID ^' ---�T --� -----------------� ,�I PONDING OF STORM WATER ON ADJACENT ` ' PROPERTIES, FINAL GRADING OF THE SITE WILL. •' GENERALLY MAINTAIN THE EXISTING GRADES °^ I - - at' I a1' I ea'_ lo AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE SUBDIVISION SITE 3) THE EXISTING TREES WILL,BE REMOVED 4) STORM WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY MITIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED THROUGH THE USE OF A STORM WATER INTERCEPTOR AND ONSITE DETENTION WILL BE PROVIDED BY OVERSIZED STORM WATER DRAIN PIPE(S) IN LAWTON DRIVE. THE FLOWS FROM THE SITE WILL BE METERED BY AN APPROPRIATELY SIZED PIPE FROM' A PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET ON LAWTON DRIVE TO THE EXISTING DRAIN INLET ON FLORAL AVENUE. 5) NO BUILDINGS, WELLS OR SEPTIC TANKS EXIST ON THE PROJECT SITE ` 6) SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY A MAIN EXTENSION FROM THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE IN FLORAL AVENUE. REQUESTED DESIGN CRITERIA MODIFICATIONS: 1) ALLOW RESIDENTIAL LOT DEPTHS OF LESS .THAN 80'. _ 2) ALLOW LESS THAN STANDARD STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTHS 3) ALLOW LESS THAN STANDARD WIDTH PARKWAY STRIPS. THIS TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP WAS PREPARED BYME R Uf DER MY DI CT BY: •Id& DATE. WES E GILBERT R.C.E. 31689 , EXPIRES: 12/31/08 e"epap°"'�q 44 f " ' LOCATION MAP ' NTS LEGEND: --- SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY UNE PROPOSED LOT UNE PROPOSED CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET ° GF -al PROPOSED STORM WATER INTERCEPTOR - — CENTERLINE - - - - - - EASEMENT P.S.E. PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT P.U.E. PUBLIC UTIUTY EASEMENT ---- EXISTING LOT LINE - - ' EXISTING CENTERUNE EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR — — EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT > A EXISTING STREET LIGHT, TO REMAIN r X21 a EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET, TO REMAIN - - ® EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE .. '� EXISTING POWER POLE, TO REMAIN EXISTING POWER POLE WITH GUY WARE. TO REMAIN EXISTING EUCALYPTUS TREE, TO BE REMOVED ' - i leN EXISTING WALNUT TREE, TO BE REMOVED •------:::::. EXISTING CURB. GUTTER AND SIDEWALK EXISTING FENCE _ pd EXISTING WATER VALVE, TO REMAIN EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT FLORAL 'ARRANGEMENT VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISIONS 03-25 (A PUBLIC STREET SUBDIVISION),, FOR I I , LORAL ARRANGEMENT, INC. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 12 OF THE FIFTEENTH SUBDIVISION OF THE JOHN BIDWELL RANCHO, BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 48, BUTTE. COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS CITY OF CHICO. COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA GILBERT ENGINEERING 70 DECLARATION DRIVE. SUITE 101 - CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 (530) 899 - 9503 JANUARY 25, 2005 - - SHEET 1 OF 2 r A Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division Airport Land Use Commission March 16, 2005, ALUC Meeting �i AGENDA ITEM — H.4 f' TO: Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: Stephen Betts, Senior Planner DATE: March 16, 2005 ITEM: ALUC File No. A 05-16 - Floral Arrangement Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map S 03-25, APN 015-250-044 (was 048-300-044): A consistency review for the proposed Floral Arrangement Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map that would divide a 1.25 -acre parcel into six single-family residential lots. The project.site is located on the west side of Floral Avenue, approximately 600 feet north of East Avenue, Northeast Chico area. SUMMARY: Staff recommends that ALUC find the project consistent with the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport. Consistency is used upon the recently - approved amendment to Section 2.4.4 of the 2000 Butte County Airpo Land Use Compatibility Plan and upon anticipated approval of the City of Chico infill development map at the March 16 meeting. BACKGROUND: • The property is 1.25 acres in size and is undeveloped. • The property is within the incorporated limits of the City of Chico. The project site is designated Low Density Residential on the City of Chico General Plan Diagram and is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential). • Existing land uses within 500 feet of the project site include a church, plant nursery, professional office uses, and residential subdivisions at a density of approximately 6 units per acre. sosdo 4 a. c" g e Qck • Six (6) parcels are proposed, rangjng in size frim 5 478 to 5 75 sn�,arfP r. Proposed uses are single family dwellings. No open space on the project site is proposed. • The height of the tallest object on the project site is anticipated to be approximately 35 feet above ground level, which equates to approximately 254 feet above mean sea level. • The project site lies under the extended centerline of Runway 31R/13L of the Chico Municipal Airport, at a distance of 2.05 miles southeast of this runway. ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-i.6 (Floral Arrangement Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map) ■ March 16, 2005 ■ Page 1 of 6 ■ gyp/• The project site lies within Airport Compatibility Zone B2 (Extended Approach/Departure Zone). �r • The project site is within the 55 dB CNEL noise contour as shown on Exhibits 4D (Noise Impacts — Future Average Fire Season Day) and 4F (Noise Impacts — Expanded Forecast) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Exhibit 4G (Noise Impacts — Peak Fire Attack Day) shows that the project site is within the 60 dB CNEL noise contour. �(/• The proposed subdivision map qualifies as infill development pursuant to Section 15332 of �C the California Environmental Quality Act. Amendment to Policy 2.4.4 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan • At the February 16, 2005, ALUC meeting the Commission approved an amendment to Section 2.4.4 (Special Conditions) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. The amendment allows infill development that would otherwise be inconsistent with the B2 Airport Consistency Zone. Section 2.4.4 now allows infill development on parcels that are 5 acres or less in size. If the proposed infill development meets the infill development requirements of Section 15332 (In - Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act the infill development density may be equal to, but no greater than, the density that exists on the most densely developed property that is located within 500 feet of the perimeter of the parcel. The City of Chico previously provided a map to the ALUC that showed those parcels eligible for infill development in the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone south of the Chico Municipal Airport, but the ALUC has not formally adopted that infill development map. Formal adoption by ALUC of the City of Chico's proposed infill development map is expected to occur at the March 16, 2005, ALUC meeting. (Note: Adoption of that map will occur prior to the hearing on this project). The infill development map shows the project parcel. ANALYSIS: • This project is a major land use action as defined by Policy 1.5.3 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). • The primary compatibility criteria for the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone are shown on the following table: Compatibility Zone Criteria Maximum Densities Req'd Other Development Zone Open Prohibited Uses Conditions Residential Land (du/ac)' Children's schools, Minimum NLR of 25 dB < 0.2 (average day care center, in residences, airspace B2 (Extended parcel size > 5.0 libraries, hospitals, review for objects >70 Approach/Departure — acres) 0 20% nursing homes, feet tall, deed notice Zone) highly noise- required sensitive uses, hazards to fli ht m Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-16 (Floral Arrangement . Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map) ■ March 16, 2005 ■ Page 2 of 6 ■ 1 Extract from Table 2A of the 2000 ALUCP • The project would result in six residential parcels on 1.25 acres, which is a density of 4.8 dwelling units per acre (with an average parcel size of 0.21 acres). This density is n'�� of consistent with the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone, which requires a minimum parcel size of 5 acres or larger (0.2 dwelling units or less per acre). • The project site meetsthe criteria for infill development of Section 2.4.4(a)(3) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan because it is 5 acres or less in size, qualifies as infill development pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act, and the density of the project would be less than the highest existing residential developments within 500 feet 65T -the project site,. which is approximately Duni s per acre. • Section 4.1.3 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan states that the maximum noise level for residential uses in the vicinity of an airpor. is 55 dB CNEL, except for the area south of the Chico Municipal Airport, where a 60 dB CNEL noise maximum is acceptable. Pursuant to Section 4.1.5(a) of the 2000 Butte Co--mty Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, staff recommends that all dwellings on the project site be designed and constructed to achieve a maximum interior noise level of 45 dB CNEL. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: No environmental documentation has been completed for this project by ALUC staff. The City of Chico staff will complete an environmental initial study and make 'a determination per the California Environmental Quality Act as part of their processing of the vesting tentative . subdivision map. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission find ALUC File No. A 05-16 (Floral Arrangement, Inc.) consistent with the infill development policy of Section 2.4.4 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Exhibits: A: Findings B: List of References C: Project Location and Compatibility Zones Map D: Site Plan kAplanning\aluc\reports\floral arrangement\floral arrangement a 05- agenda report.doc ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-16 (Floral Arrangement Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map) ■ March 16, 2005 ■ Page 3 of 6 ■ • Countywide Policies. `/ Chapter 2 - ri ► The Compatibility Plan must be adopted by reference (additionally, the project review procedure must be described in a separate instru- ment presented to and approved by the ALUC); and/or { No. The general plan must indicate that all major land use actions,'as, ' i listed in Policy 1.5.3 w otherwise agreed to by the ALUC, shall be referred to the Commission for review in accordance with the policies of Section 2.3. (3) The status of ALUC review of major land use actions depends upon which of 'r , t the preceding options the local agency selects f.'Dr making its general plan consistent with the Compatibility Plan. This status: in turn, affects whether a 'E local agency would be required to utilize the override process in the event of a disagreement with the ALUC's action. • ' . ► If either of the first two options under Sub-pclicy (2) is selected, then R• 1 referral of major land use actions to the ALUC is voluntary. In this case, ' t the Commission's review is advisory and the local agency would not w { need to utilize the override process if it elecfs to approve a project i 4• " without incorporating the Commission's comments. ;� ► If the third option is chosen, submittal of-majDr land use actions for ALUC review is mandatory and override procedures would'apply. .'2.4. S ecial Conditions (a) .,Infill- Where development not in conformance with this Compatibility Plan already exists within Compatibility Zones B2 and C, infi I deve opmen o similar 1 ' land'uses may be allowed to occur even if such land uses are to be prohibited ' elsewhere in those zones, under the circumstances described below. Infill., development within all other zones must be in conformance with this Compatibility Plan. (1) One-time determination of eligibility: To -avoid the ripple effect of infill development on some parcels permitting additional parcels subsequently • - to qualify for infill, the ALUC's intent is that parcels eligible for infill be ,r determined just once. Thus, in order for the ALUC to consider proposed ? development under these infill criteria, the entity paving land use authority (Butte County or affected cities) must first identify,the qualifying locations in its general plan or other planning document approved by the'ALUC. ` - This action may take place independently, in'corjunction with the process ` + of amending a general plan for consistency with the ALUC plan, or may be submitted by the local a ency for consideration by the ALUC at the -time of adoption of th Compatibility Plan In any case, the burderi for -demonstrating that a proposed development qualifies as infill rests with ; f;( the project proponent and/or affected land use jurisdiction. ' - L . (2) Criteria for eligibility: To qualify for infill development, a parcel shall meet all of the following criteria except as provided below: ► The parcel size is no larger than 20 acres. A = ' j ► The site is at least 65% bounded (disregarding roads) by existing'uses similar to, or more intensive than, those propos-ad. This requirement' does not apply to residential developments that qualify as infill projects as defined in Section 15332 (In -Fill Dev=lopment Projects) of . . - the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. * % The site is within the perimeter of the area defined by the surrounding; already developed, incompatible uses. 2-17 j!L-- Countywide Policies / Chapter 2 ... ^. ► The site has not previouslybeen set aside as open land in accordance c with Policy 4:2.5 unless replacement open land is provided within the same compatibility zone. (3) Allowable density/intensity of development: The maximum density and/or ' intensity of development of an approved infill site shall not exceed that described below. Further. increases in the density, intensity, and/or other incompatible design -or, usage characteristics (e.g., through use permits, density transfers, addition of second units on the same parcel, height . ` variances, or other strategy) are prohibited. ` For residential development: r� ► If the size of a parcel is 5 acres or less and the development proposed 4 for that parcel qualifies as an infill development project as defined in . . 1' Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, then the development'density +` may be equal to, but shall be no greater than, the density that exists on the most densely developed property that is located within 500 r feet of the perimeter of the parcel. ► If the size of a parcel is greater than 5 acres but not greater than 10 acres, or if the parcel is 5 acres or less in size but the development.' proposed does not qualify as an infill development project as defined in Section 15332 (In-Fill'Development Projects) of,the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, then the development' density . - shall be no greater than.the overall density represented by all existing, lots which lie fully or partially within a distance of 300 feet from the boundary of the parcel to be divided. •3 7 `rr ► If the size of the parcel is greater than 10 acres (but no larger than 20 acres), then the development density shall be no greater than double ` the density permitted in accordance with the Primary Compatibility ` Criteria (Table 2A). For nonresidential development: `Yl , 75 ' ► If the size of the parcel proposed for development is 10 acres or less, the usage intensity (the number of people per acre) of the proposed use shall be no greater than the average intensity of all existing uses " which lie fully or partially within a distance of 300 feet from the boundary of the proposed development. ► If the size of the parcel proposed for development is greater than 10 acres (but no larger than 20 acres), the proposed use shall not have N an intensity (the number of people per acre) more than 50% above the intensity permitted in accordance with the Primary Compatibility Criteria (Table 2A). [For,example, whereas an average intensity of 50 people per acre is normally permitted in Zone B2, the infill policy would, F allow a total of 75 people per acre (50 people/acre x 150% = 75 people/acre.] (b) Nonconforming Uses —Uses not in conformance with this Compatibility Plan ' may only be expanded as follows: ' (1 J Nonconforming residential uses may be expanded in building size pro= ; vided that the expansion does not result in more dwelling units than currently exist on the parcel. r Butte County Department of Development Services r Planning Division Airport Land Use Commission March 16, 2005, ALUC Meeting AGENDA ITEM — H.4 TO: Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: I Stephen Betts, Senior Planner DATE: March 16, 2005 ITEM: ALUC File No. A 05-16 - Floral Arrangement VestinZ, Tentative Subdivision Map S 03-25, APN 015-250-044 (was 048-300-044): A consistency review for { the proposed Floral Arrangement Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map that would divide a 1.25 -acre parcel into six single-family residential lots. The project site is located on the west side of Floral Avenue, approximately 600 feet north of East Avenue, Northeast Chico area. SUMMARY: Staff recommends that ALUC find the project consistent with the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport. Consistency is based upon the recently - approved amendment to Section 2.4.4 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan and upon anticipated approval of the City of Chico infill development map at the March 16 meeting. BACKGROUND: • The property is .1.25 acres in size and is undeveloped. • The property is within the incorporated limits of the City of Chico. The project site is designated Low Density Residential on the City of Chico, General Plan Diagram and is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential). • Existing land uses within 500 feet of the project site include a church, plant nursery, professional office uses, and residential subdivisions at a density of approximately 6 units per acre. • Six (6) parcels are proposed, ranging in size from 5,478 to 5,775 squFxe feet. Proposed uses are single family dwellings. No open space on the project site is proposed. • The height of the tallest object on the project site is anticipated to be approximately 35 feet above ground level, which equates to approximately 254 feet above mean sea level. • The project site lies under the extended centerline of Runway 31R/13L of the Chico Municipal Airport, at a distance of 2.05 miles southeast of this runway ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-16 (Floral Arrangement Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map) ■ March 16, 2005 ■ Page 1 of 6 ■ Y, • The project site lies within Airport Compatibility Zone B2 (Extended Approach/Departure' Zone). The project site is within the 55 dB CNEL noise contour as shown on Exhibits 4D (Noise Impacts — Future Average Fire Season Day) and 4F (Noise Impacts — Expanded Forecast) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Exhibit 4G (Noise Impacts — Peak Fire Attack Day) shows that the project site is within the 60 dB CNEL noise contour. • The proposed subdivision map qualifies as infill development pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act. Amendment to Policy 2.4.4 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan • At the February 16, 2005, ALUC meeting the Commission approved an amendment to Section 2.4.4 (Special Conditions) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. The amendment allows infill development that would otherwise be inconsistent with the B2 Airport Consistency Zone. • Section 2.4.4 now allows infill development on parcels that are 5 acres or less in size. If the proposed infill development meets the infill development requirements of Section 15332 (In - Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act the infill development density may be equal to, but no greater than, the density that exists on the most densely developed property that is located within 500 feet of the perimeter of the parcel. The City of Chico previously provided a map to the ALUC that showed those parcels eligible for infill development in the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone south of the Chico Municipal Airport, but the ALUC has not formally adopted that infill development map. Formal adoption by ALUC of the City of Chico's proposed infill development map is expected to occur at the March 16, 2005, ALUC meeting. (Note: Adoption of that map will occur prior to the hearing on this project). The infill development map shows the project parcel. ANALYSIS: • This project is a major land use action as defined by Policy 1.5.3 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). • The primary compatibility criteria for the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone are shown on the following table: Compatibility Zone Criteria Maximum Densities Req'd Other Development Zone Open Prohibited Uses Conditions Residential Land du/ac ' Children's schools, Minimum NLR of 25 dB < 0.2 (average day care center, in residences, airspace B2 (Extended parcel size > 5.0 libraries, hospitals, review for objects >70 Approach/Departure — acres) a 20% nursing homes, feet tall, deed notice Zone) highly noise- required sensitive uses, hazards to flight ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-16 (Floral Arrangement Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map) ■ March 16, 2005 ■ Page 2 of 6 ■ Extract from Table 2A of the 2000 ALUCP • The project would result in six residential parcels on 1.25 acres, which is a density of 4.8 dwelling units per, acre (with an average parcel size of 0.21 acre3). This density is not consistent with the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone, which requires a.minimum parcel size of 5 acres or larger (0.2 dwelling units or less per acre). • The project site meets the criteria for infill development of Section 2.4.4(a)(3) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan because it is a acres or less in size, qualifies as infill development pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act, and the density of the project would be less than the highest density of the existing residential developments within 500 feet of the project site, which is approximately 6 units.per acre. • Section 4.1.3 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibflity Plan states that the maximum noise level for residential uses in the vicinity of an airport =s 55 dB CNEL, except for the area south of the Chico Municipal Airport, where a 60 dB CNEL noise maximum is acceptable. Pursuant to Section 4.1.5(a) of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, staff recommends that all dwellings on the project site be designed and constructed to achieve a maximum interior noise level of 45 dB CN -EI - ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: No environmental documentation has been completed for this project by ALUC staff. The City of Chico staff will complete an environmental initial study and make a determination per the California Environmental Quality Act as part of their processing of the vesting tentative subdivision map. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission fmd ALUC File No. A 05-16 (Floral Arrangement, Inc.) consistent with the infill development pol=cy of Section 2.4.4 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Exhibits: A: Findings B: List of References C: Project Location and Compatibility Zones Map D: Site Plan kAplanning\aluc\reports\floral arrangement\floral arrangement a 05- agenda report.doc ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-16 (F --oral Arrangement Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map) ■ March 16, 2005 ■ Page 3 of 6 ■ EXHIBIT A BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR ALUC FILE NO. 05-16, FLORAL ARRANGEMENT VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP S 03-25, APN 015-250-044 (was 048-300- 0 The Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) has prepared the following findings based on data contained in the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP), as well as site specific information submitted by the applicant and ALUC staff. The following findings have been prepared at the direction of the ALUC and are for the consideration of the Lead Agency (City of Chico) when making a decision on the project. SECTION 1: ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS A. No environmental documentation has been completed for this project by ALUC staff. The City of Chico staff will complete an environm-,ntal initial study and make a determination per the California Environmental Quality Act as part of their processing of the vesting tentative subdivision map. SECTION 2: CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT A. The proposal for the Floral Arrangement Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map that would divide a 1.25 -acre parcel into six single-family residential lots, is consistent with the infill development criteria of Section 2.4.4(a)(31 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. SECTION 3: PROJECT FINDINGS: A. The project site meets the criteria for infill development of Section 2.4.4(a)(3) because: 1. The project site is 5 acres or less in size 2. The Tentative Subdivision Map project qualifies as infill development pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act 3. The density of the project, at approximately 4.6 units: per acre, would be less than the density of the highest existing residential development within 500 feet of the project site, which is approximately 6 units per acre. 4. The project site is shown on the City of Chico's infill. development map, as approved by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission on March 16, 2005 B. No structures on the project site would extend into protected airspace. C. All dwellings on the project are required to be designed and constructed to have a maximum interior noise level of 45 dB CNEL or less in order to prevent significant aircraft -related noise impacts. ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-16 (Floral Arrangement Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map) ■ March 16, 2005 ■ Page 4 of 6 ■ SECTION 4: PROJECT CONDITIONS: 1. Provide a deed notice for the sale of all resulting lots notifying purchasers of the proximity of the airport and the potential for possible noise -related impacts in an ALUC-approved disclosure notice. 2. Airspace review by the Airport Land Use Commission required for objects greater than 70 feet tall. 3. All dwellings shall be designed and constructed to achieve a maximum interior noise level of 45 dB- CNEL or below. ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-16 (Floral Arrangement Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map) ■ March 16, 2005 ■ Page 5 of 6 ■ EXHIBIT B List of References Data supporting the ALUC's findings have been generated from studies and reports prepared by recognized professionals and agencies with expertise in Airport Land Use Planning and land use compatibility. These include, but are not limited to: Butte County 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ ALUC File No. A 05-16 (Floral Arrangement Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map) ■ March 16, 2005 ■ Page 6 of 6 ■ Hearing Date: March 16, 2005 Existing Zoning: R-1 (City of Chico) Page 1 of 1 Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:24 AM To: 'SASPlanning@sbcglobal.net' Subject: ALUC agenda report for Floral Arrangement TSM - ALUC File # A 05-16 Steve, 'Attached for your review is the ALUC agenda report for the Floral Arrangement TSM project. Thanks -S- Stephen Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Desk (530) 538-7153 Fax (530) 538-7785 3/2/2005 06 + BUTTE COUNTY ` - FEB 2 4 2005 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Sumerville, City of Chico Planning Division FROM: Neil Sullivan, Butte County Environmental Health RE: Floral Arrangement VTSM (S 03-25) DATE: I February 23, 2005 This Department has reviewed the tentative map for the above referenced subdivision. We understand that the City of Chico will provide sewer service and that public water will serve the subdivision. Also, our files indicate that a formerly existing septic tank, at 2581 Floral Ave (DBA: Champion Christian School), was properly destroyed to this Department's satisfaction on 05-05-98. Any other unknown and existing tanks will need to be dest_.oyed per Butte County Code regulations. On that basis, we approve of the tentative map of the subdivision w_th no conditions. If you have any questions, please contact me at 891-2727. Sincerely, Nei. �........ R.E.H.S. II Butte County Environmental Health NS /land/citysubmaps/floralarrangement 0 Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division Airport Land Use Commission TO: FROM: DATE: ITEM: February 18, 2004 Meeting AGENDA ITEM —E.2 Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission Carl Durling, Associate Planner February 11, 2004 ALUC File No. A04-11 (Champion Christian School — Floral Arrangement), APN 048-300-044: A consistency review for the proposed Floral Arrangement Tentative Subdivision Map, which would divide a 1.25 a. -,re parcel into 9 single- family residential lots. The project site is located on -he west side of floral Avenue, north of East Avenue about 600 feet, and at the intersection with Ravenshoe Way, southeast of the Chico Municipal Airport in the B2 - Compatibility zone. SUMMARY: Staff recommends that ALUC find the project inconsistent with the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport. BACKGROUND: • The project is comprised of a single parcel which is currently undeveloped.. • The property is within the City limits of the .City of Chico and is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential) and has .a General Plan Land Use Designation of Low Density Residential. • The project is considered a major land use action as defined by Policy 1.5.3 of the Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). • The proposed subdivision map would create 9 single-family residentizl lots with a density of approximately 7.20 dwelling units per acre. • Parcel sizes range from 2,767 square net feet to 4,550 square net fest. Majority of parcels will average 3,800 square feet; the overall gross average (includes street) is 6,050 square feet. • The project site is located approximately 2.80 mile_ s southeast of runway 12/30 centerline of the Chico Municipal Airport. AF Butte County Department of Development Services AF Airport Land Use Commission i Floral Arrangement A04-11 -- Page lof 5 • The project site is within Airport Compatibility Zone B2 (Traffic Pattern). ANALYSIS: • This project is a major land use action as defined by Policy 1.5.3 of the 2000 Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). • The primary compatibility criteria for the B2 Compatibility Zone i:. shown on the following table: Zone Residential Density Other Uses Req'd Prohibited Uses Other Development du/ac people/ac) Open Land Conditions o Minimum NLR of 1 dwelling Children's schools, 20db in residences. B2 unit per 5 Within Parcel exempt day care centers o Deed notice required. Limits because of size prohibited acres o Maximum height of 70 feet. r,xrraciea rrom iaoie zA or the ZUVV ALU UF, page 1-14 • The residential density of the project,is inconsistent with Airport Compatibility Zone B2 because the density is not less than or equal to parcel size of 0.2 dwelling units per acre (1 dwelling unit per 5 acres). • Section 2.4.4 of the 2000 ALUCP discusses the use of infill where p:-oposed development is not in conformance with the ALUCP. A parcel may be considered for infill development if it meets all of the following criteria: 1. The parcel is no larger than 20 acres. (Yes) 2. The site is not bounded by at least 65% by existing uses similar to. or more intrusive than the proposed project. (No) 3. The proposed. project would not extend the perimeter of the area defined, by the surrounding, already developed, incompatible uses. (Yes) 4. Further increases in the density, intensity, and/or other incompatible design or usage characteristics (e.g. through use permits, density transfers, addition of second units on the same parcel, height variances, or other strategy) are prohibited. 5. The area to be developed cannot previously been set aside as open space in accordance with Policy 4.2.5 unless replacement open land is provided within .he same compatibility zone. AF Butte County Department of Development Services RAirport Land Use Commission i Floral Arrangement A04-11 -- Page 2of 5 6. For residential development: • If the parcel size proposed to be developed is 10 acres or less the development density shall be no greater than the overall density represented by all existing lots which lie fully or partially within a distance of 300 feet from the boundary of the parcel to be divided. The development density for the area is 2.61 dwelling units per acre. The project density is 7.2 dwelling units per acre. Residential Density for Project Area and Vicinity Density (D.U./A>✓.) Project 7.2 300 -Foot Vicinity 2.61 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: No environmental documentation has been completed for this project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission find ALUC File No. A04-11 (Champion Christian School) inconsistent with the 2000 Airport --and Use Compatibility Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport. Exhibits: A: Findings B: List of References C: Project Location and Compatibility Zones D: Location Map E: Site Plan K:\Planning\ALUC\ALUC ApplicationsTloral Arrangements, IncTloral Arrangement A04-11 Agenda Report.Aoc EXHIBIT A T N Butte County Department of Development Services AF Airport Land Use Commission's Floral Arrangement A04-11 --Page 3of 5 BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR: ALUC File No. A04-11: Champion Christian School — (Floral Arrangement). APN 048-300-044 The Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) has prepared the following, findings based on data contained in the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for the Chico Municipal Airport, as well as site specific information submitted by the applicant a -rid ALUC staff. The following findings have been prepared at the direction of the ALUC and are for the consideration of the Lead Agency (Butte County) when making a decision on the project. SECTION 1: ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS A. I No environmental documentation was submitted at the time of project review. SECTION 2: CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT A. - The proposed Floral Arrangement Tentative Subdivis=on . Map, which would divide a 1.25 acre parcel into 9 single-family residential lots, is inconsistent with Compatibility Zone B2 as found in the 2000 Airport Lane. Use Compatibility Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport. SECTION 3: PROJECT FINDINGS: A. The project site is located in Airport Compatibility Zones B2 as listed in the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport. B., The residential density of 7.2 dwelling units per acre for the project is inconsistent with Airport Compatibility Zone B2 as the density is greater than 0.2 dwelling units per acre. 1. SECTION 4: PROJECT CONDITIONS: 1. Provide a deed notice for the sale of all resulting lots notifying purchasers of the proximity of the airport and the potential for possible noise related impacts in an ALUC-approved disclosure notice. 2. Minimum Noise Level Reduction (N -LR) of 20 dB . in residences (including Mobile Homes. 3. Airspace review required for objects greater than 70 feet tall. AF Butte County Department of Development Services NAirport Land Us:? Commission i Floral Arrangement A04-11 --Page 4of 5 EXHIBIT B List of References k Data supporting the ALUC's findings have been generated from studies and reports prepared by recognized professionals and agencies with expertise in Airport Land Use Planning and land use compatibility. These include, but are not limited to: Butte County 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan AF Butte County Department of Development Services /Airport Land Use Commission i : Floral Arrangement A04-11 -- Page 5of 5 Mr. Michelena said the pond would be dry 80-90% of the year. He said the pond would be for peak runoff. The hearing was opened to the public. No one was present to speak. The hearing was closed. It was moved by Commissioner Sherman, seconded by Commissioner Grierson, and unanimously carried to find ALUC File No. A 04-14 (Dave Snow) consistent with the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Oroville Municipal Airport. 2. ALUC File No. A04-11 (Champion Christian School — Floral Arrangement), APN 048-300-044: A consistency review for the proposed Floral Arrangement Tentative Subdivision Map, which would divide a 1.25 acre pa_cel into 9 single-family residential lots. The project site is located on the west side of Floral Avenue, north of East Avenue about 600 feet, and at the intersection with Ra-enshoe Way, southeast of the Chico Municipal Airport in the B2 Compatibility zone. Mr. Michelena gave a brief summary of the project. He submitted a corrected report. He said that staff is recommending the Commission find this request inconsistent with Lae 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport. The hearing was opened to the public. Tony Symmes asked if there was a way the Commission could make the finding that this property is infill land. He said this property is true infill land and, therefore, the finding can be made that the property is compatible with the Airport Land Use Plan. Mr. Michelena pointed out that the last page of the report shows the exist --ng area and surrounding parcels. He noted one house with a nursery to the south. Mr. Symmes said the bigger lot further south has a couple of houses that is being converted to commercial use. Mr. Michelena said he looked at the compatibility map from the CLUP and his property is in the B-2 zone bordering the C Zone. Bob Summerville, City of Chico, said he was there to answer questions. He said the City is processing a Categorical Exemption for this project. Vice Chairman Harp asked how the area was developing. 0 Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of Meeting of February 18, 2004 0 Page 1 ■ ip Mr. Summerville said the whole area is designated Low Density Residential. He said this project is consistent with the area. He said the revised map given to the Commission comes in at 6.4 gross dwelling units to the acre, which exceeds the LDR designation of 6 units. Commissioner Grierson asked if this property was in the lower right-hand corner of the Compatibility map in the B-2 zone. Mr. Michelena said that is correct. Vice Chairman Harp said this area is an old ranchette area of Chico and is now being developed at a higher density. He said across the street from this property is development similar to what the applicant is asking and this seems to be the proper development for the area. Mr. Baker said the property was reviewed from the standpoint of looking at the CLUP. He said the Property is in the B-2 area, on the centerline of the runway. He said that the property is on the extreme edge of the B-2 area, but based on the criteria in the CLUP the project is not consistent. Commissioner Hennigan said the City of Chico adopted plans to protect the airport, and then approve subdivisions in conflict with their adopted plans. Commissioner Sherman said that there is always a boundary line somewhere and there are usually nonconforming uses within that boundary. She said part of the adoption of the CLUP is to prevent expansion of the nonconforming uses. Mr. Symmes said if the Commission votes against this project, the land will be unusable. . Commissioner Hennigan said the land can be used for many things, i.e.; the current use, any number of commercial uses, etc. Mr. Symmes said the current use is gravel and one tree. He said it would be better to put the" land to use with homes. He said the property could be used for affordable housing and could be considered infill. Commissioner Sherman asked how the line was drawn for the B-2 zoning. Commissioner Grierson explained how they used clearly defined features when the map was made, such as the 500 kilowatt lines on the east, creek beds, roadways, etc. Commissioner Sherman asked how large the church property was and the maximum capacity of the assembly hall. Mr. Michelena said he believed the school property was a little over 4 acres and less than 6 acres. He said he did not determine the number of students in the school. Mr. Symmes said that Floral Arrangement Inc. bought the property from the Champion Christian School. - ■ Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of Meeting of February 18, 2004 0 Page 3 ■ r, Commissioner Rosene asked what instrument approaches would go over this site. Commissioner Grierson said the VOR, 3-1 right, GPS approach and a circle the land approach. Commissioner Rosene asked if a circle the land approach was 300 feet. Commissioner Grierson said that approach was approximately 700 feet. Mr. Michelena noted that if the Commission found a way to find this project consistent, there are three suggested conditions. Commissioner Grierson said if the Commission finds this project consistent, they would have to make the findings to find this compatible. Commissioner Rosene asked if the property was conveyed to Floral Arrangements from the school or the church. Mr. Symmes said the school and church are one in the same owner. Commissioner Hennigan said the property is between the 55 and 60 CNEL contour on a normal day for noise, between 60 and 65 CNEL on a peak fire day. He said the parcel is inside the accident scatter for departures to the south. He said this project was clearly not compatible with the Plan. He. said in order to approve this project; they would have to amend the plan. Commissioner Sherman agreed. The hearing was closed. It was moved by Commissioner Sherman, seconded by Commissioner Hennigan, and unanimously carried to find ALUC File No A 04-11 (Floral Arrangements) inconsistent with the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport. The Commission asked staff to list on the "To Do" list for them to look at the boundaries of the B-2 zone when amending the CLUP. F. ITEMS WITHOUT PUBLIC HEARING 1. CLUP Review and Update Mr. Michelena gave a brief overview stating that this is the second hea:mg for review of the Ranchaero Airport. He made a power point presentation with a hard copy to the Commission. He said there was a question at the last meeting on whether the parcel to the south could be split or have a second dwelling. He said all parcels that.fall in the B-2 protection runway area are all less than 20 acres. He, said the zoning is A-10. He said the County does allow agricultura- worker housing in the A zones. He said the A zones do not allow second dwellings. , ■ Airport Land Use Commission 0 Minutes of Meeting of February 18, 2004 0 Page 4 ■ ILBERT 70 DECLARATION DRIVE, SUITE 101 CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973 NGINEERING FAX (899-9503 9649 January 27, 2005 City of Chico Community Development Department Planning Division P. O. Box 3420 Chico, California 95927 Attn: Bob Summerville Subject: Floral. Arrangement Tentative Subdivision Map (S 03-25) Dear Bob: The following items are attached for processing the above referenced tentative subdivision map through ALUC: 0 Completed and signed Butte County ALUC Application for Consistency Findings • Twenty-four (24) copies of map showing scaled relationship between the project and the airport • Twenty-four (24) copies of the reduced tentative subdivision map • Check No. made out to Butte County in the amount of $1,531.00 for application fees 'Thank you for your assistance. , Sincerely, Gilbert Engineering \ 4 Wesley . Gilbert, Principal Attachments Cc:.Tony Synirries JAN' 2 7 2005 CIT" OF CHICO PLAINUNG DIVISION floral0.doc ` 1286.01 CIVIL ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING • PROJECT DEVELOPMENT FILE NO: A' 0 S— / APPLICANT: OWNER: SA REPRESENTATIVE: PR POSED RE UES' 0 "DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET AP# lS— S' — y CJ-3o0-oyy f to be filled out by person taking in application)' FINAL REOUEST: (to be filled out by nroiect nlanner) SIZE: LOCATION: �'Tpt �1�L. i iy'10'R.h (� 5t- SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT # .3 EXISTING ZONING: C_ GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LJ4 ASSIGNED PLANNER: �(, l 1 PLANNER's INITIALS 1 Date Application Received Date Pro'ect Assigned ?i ko 5 IDR Date 30 Day Complete Tentative Hearing Date K:PIanningTormsTead In Sheet.doc COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST County Offices and Cities: Chief Administrative Officer X Develop. Services Director X Environmental Health X Assessor Sheriff _ BCAG X LAFCo _ Air Quality Mgmt. Biggs _ Gridley _ Oroville _ Paradise Information Systems Dept. —Animal Control X County Counsel . Irrigation District: _ Butte Water —Biggs/W. Gridley Water _ South Feather Water & Power Agency _ Paradise Irrigation Table Mountain Irrigation _ Thermalito Irrigation District Domestic Water _ Butte Water District _California Water Service Co. OWID _ Thermalito IrrigationDistrict Sewer _ Butte Water District _ Themalito Irrigation Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) _ L.O.A. PUD Fire Protection X California Department of Forestry _ EI Medio Fire Protection District Recreation Districts Chico Area Recreation _ Durham Area Recreation Paradise Recreation & Park Richvale Recreation & Parks Utilities _ PG&E _ Chambers Cable TV Viacom Cable TV State Agencies _ CalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept. of Water Resources _ Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter) _ Dept of Parks and Rec. _ CA Reg. Water Quality Control Board _ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program _ Department of Conservation _ Office of Mining Reclamation Dept.Social Services, Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies _ US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management - Army Corps of Engineers _ National Marine Fisheries Service Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. Lime Saddle Dist _ Community Association _ Drainage _ Butte Env.l Council _ Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society _ Butte Co. Mining Committee _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. _ Butte Creek Watershed Conservancy _Mosquito Abatement District. X Public Works Director X Building Manager _ ALUC _ Butte Co. Farm Bureau _ Chico Chico Airport Commission X Agricultural Commission _ Durham Irrigation _ Richvale Irrigation Other _ Del Oro Water Co. Other _ Sterling City Sewer Main Feather River Rec. & Park SBC. _ Dept. of Fish and Game Highway Patrol _ Office of Governmental & Env. Relations US Fish & Wildlife Service School Districts K:\Planning\Forms\DISTR.wpd 34 ' 8M 2 t� ' ,• .H i .Taxer M 40 o = � '��.,\ ( I ✓ �`�•• • hP MUNI 1,'MrAL• 'AIR OR••,� ;, '� ,'. ' '• ALE - =2000 , SM 201 ant • ., ... U (� .psi•• �:;,; •,� ,: rw aua ae•a asameeei• 0 4N• . ......... : : EA TOM lao ROA opt Y •.iii • `Yi..•+.,•. u�•��/�� ti�; .. • U / AVE i. rj .:., •. km Ttal.er 4, • • ••.••.••� • r _ �•b �♦ ; �.• Park r•, ;-rte ;, �. Z • ♦9- �i• a•;•;.• ;•`.•.: Pah •..••.w SUMDMSION + r r i•°t.7 ♦ • •�♦f•� ` ,. i �, :NrMuN3S•^ �� vNi�-:. �-+2 Z •• - %r'. ' • Of w I • fi� r• .' ••tura i►• �Y-a Z •� • • . "'• �' '4 - �.' � t •a. Vie• . ?.... '•: • • • ` °•° �� . ��� ' s t1 � �%• -- -- �'• w t � .• ews wv��elan ir.�ue 0 ' . •.. • : • !�f -.• '�, '� • a+ srl:r • • !�'' Y ori ��•( EASY. • '•... 'ni lSr ate •!. .♦�,'! �t B3 4 a' I i 1.,� t►° •moor e. • e'� �Jf .jam• •• �.• ♦ � .. •r•• �:'; � •� �••.� i • J .rt•••n�!'-A�.,�. •••�.. • •• ,:♦ ••• �, iiia ••a^t�.•ss _'� ! ••f1H • ,''N - w-a:Y' } �l • .. 3' �•..•. ' •'r•.. •••�•♦•p•A••♦i• �• foa a': •�• • •' .•: •'•�ya�.r srii ♦CHICO • 6 t• _. -:'• •. ti •• � i T i �• ei •"°IY �i;. ••• � ii�s'�s- .••� i.• � � -- � r - � � _. � n � c `1A(��•' r ' � of s i�� a�•��g i°�^. •� � :1 �i � �ih•�,�s•r • ... .� c. -- .' — .S� er1•�•k :..ham-y:a'�' ...._ . i 2! x•. � ... o_ � •_• •.� • ,� 'r -.. , r�:.� �i!"� .. _ ., �`� 2205 ,7___ - - - - { ....rt�"�!•aa _ .. .� . '�' ''s OWNER AND SUBDIVIDER: FLORAL ARRANGEMENT, INC. P.O. BOX 617 CHICO. CA 95927 ENGINEER: GILBERT ENGINEERING 70 DECLARATION DRIVE, SUITE 101 ' CHICO, CA 95973 (530) 899-9503 . WESLEY E. GILBERT. R.C.E. 31689 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N0: 015-250-044 LAND USE: PRESENT: VACANT FUTURE: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: EXISTING: R1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ' PROPOSED: Rt LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING: LDR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED: LDR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - UTILITIES: SANITARY SEWER: CITY OF CHICO/CSA 23 STORM DRAIN: CITY OF CHICO WATER: CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY POWER: PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS: SBC GAS: PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CABLE TV: COMCAST SUBDIVISION NOTES: 1) SUBDIVISION INFORMATION: TOTAL ACRES - 1.25 ACRES (GROSS) NUMBER OF LOTS - 6 UNITS PER ACRE - 4.8 AVERAGE LOT'SIZE: 5,575 SF 2) GRADING WILL CONSIST OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROADWAYS AND OF BUILDINGS PADS. TO AVOID' n PONDING OF STORM WATER ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES, FINAL GRADING OF THE SITE WILL GENERALLY MAINTAIN THE EXISTING GRADES AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE SUBDIVISION SITE 3) THE EXISTING TREES WILL BE REMOVED °R 5,478 sq L r n --- �! I et' 4) STORM WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY MITIGATION op,9 I WILL BE PROVIDED THROUGH THE USE OF A STORM WATER INTERCEPTOR AND ONSITE DETENTION WILL syr BE PROVIDED BY OVERSIZED STORM WATER DRAIN PIPE(S) SITE WILL BE MIDRIVE. TEREDBY AN APPROPRIATELYTME S•Q� SIZED PIPE FROM' A PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET ON LAWTON DRIVE TO THE EXISTING DRAIN INLET ON FLORAL AVENUE. 5) NO BUILDINGS, WELLS OR SEPTIC TANKS EXIST ON THE PROJECT SITE. ' 6) SANITARY SEWER 'SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY A MAIN EXTENSION FROM THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE IN FLORAL AVENUE. REQUESTED DESIGN CRITERIA MODIFICATIONS: 1) ALLOW RESIDENTIAL LOT DEPTHS OF,LESS THAN 80'. 2) ALLOW LESS THAN STANDARD STREET, RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTHS. 3) ALLOW LESS THAN STANDARD WIDTH PARKWAY STRIPS. THIS TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP WAS PREPARED BY MERUDER MY DI CTI BY: GATE: I SOS WE E. GILBERT R.C.E. 31689 ' EXPIRES: 12/31/06 �,�poieS•+r n^par cob `9 b �•m EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET, TO REMAIN PROPOSED CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK ip PQ PROPOSED STORM GRAIN INLET I d ! I '® EXISTING POWER POLE WITH GUY WIRE, TO REMAIN 3' P.U.E. PROPOSED STORM WATER INTERCEPTOR (6 ( ( EXISTING WALNUT TREE, TO BE REMOVED . GRAPHIC SCALE CENTERLINE !� 19 EXISTING CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK .. 4 ( IN PRET) EASEMENT � < \ D4 EXISTING WATER VALVE, TO REMAIN 1 L—h c 20 2 PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT 5,480 sq.H. I 1 1 $� PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT I , • !t EXISTING LOT LINE I I ----- EXISTING CENTERLINE RAVENSHOE SPAY —:to✓- EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR i FLORAL ARRANGEMENT, INC. - ! g; EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT I I RECORDS 1Acr I I +I - STATE OF CAUFORNIA g GILBERT ENGINEERING - i - - CHICO, CALIFORNIA. 95973 - ["ABUTT'ER'S JANUARY 25, 2005 SHEET 1 OF 2 • - - i RIGHTS TO THE CITY OF CHICO s esrofi_3a_w ' L k— 6 S 8907'39' W j '718.38'• n _ _ _»s.t0' _ _7ohe_ -- °R 5,478 sq L r n --- �! I et' 4) STORM WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY MITIGATION op,9 I WILL BE PROVIDED THROUGH THE USE OF A STORM WATER INTERCEPTOR AND ONSITE DETENTION WILL syr BE PROVIDED BY OVERSIZED STORM WATER DRAIN PIPE(S) SITE WILL BE MIDRIVE. TEREDBY AN APPROPRIATELYTME S•Q� SIZED PIPE FROM' A PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET ON LAWTON DRIVE TO THE EXISTING DRAIN INLET ON FLORAL AVENUE. 5) NO BUILDINGS, WELLS OR SEPTIC TANKS EXIST ON THE PROJECT SITE. ' 6) SANITARY SEWER 'SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY A MAIN EXTENSION FROM THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE IN FLORAL AVENUE. REQUESTED DESIGN CRITERIA MODIFICATIONS: 1) ALLOW RESIDENTIAL LOT DEPTHS OF,LESS THAN 80'. 2) ALLOW LESS THAN STANDARD STREET, RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTHS. 3) ALLOW LESS THAN STANDARD WIDTH PARKWAY STRIPS. THIS TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP WAS PREPARED BY MERUDER MY DI CTI BY: GATE: I SOS WE E. GILBERT R.C.E. 31689 ' EXPIRES: 12/31/06 �,�poieS•+r n^par cob `9 b "LAy--t'd 4&5' ROW 299, wI , G I 83' 83' 67* s--- --L---- =—�— ----- r to P.S.E. ,YP. i 3 I z 5,577 sq. 'k. _ I Y 5,574 sq.. N. I H ._ r5,775 sq. k. I" 253.88' ' N 89ro6'38' E i 301.89% 1 f � ABUTTER'S RIGHTS TO THE CITY OF CHICO ov I& PQM I d 0 k 4 LOCATION MAP of NTS R� LEGEND: -- SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY UNE ' PROPOSED LOT UNE - I �•m EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET, TO REMAIN PROPOSED CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK ip PQ PROPOSED STORM GRAIN INLET I d ! I '® EXISTING POWER POLE WITH GUY WIRE, TO REMAIN 3' P.U.E. PROPOSED STORM WATER INTERCEPTOR (6 ( ( EXISTING WALNUT TREE, TO BE REMOVED . T g E i CENTERLINE !� 19 EXISTING CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK .. 4 - - - - - - EASEMENT � < \ D4 EXISTING WATER VALVE, TO REMAIN P.S.E. PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT 5,480 sq.H. 5.S666 sq. N. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT I , Ie� i � EXISTING LOT LINE I FLORAL ARRANGEMENT VESTING ----- EXISTING CENTERLINE RAVENSHOE SPAY —:to✓- EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR i FLORAL ARRANGEMENT, INC. - I6 ! I n I I EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT I I RECORDS � - STATE OF CAUFORNIA _. - _ - - - - - GILBERT ENGINEERING - i "LAy--t'd 4&5' ROW 299, wI , G I 83' 83' 67* s--- --L---- =—�— ----- r to P.S.E. ,YP. i 3 I z 5,577 sq. 'k. _ I Y 5,574 sq.. N. I H ._ r5,775 sq. k. I" 253.88' ' N 89ro6'38' E i 301.89% 1 f � ABUTTER'S RIGHTS TO THE CITY OF CHICO ov I& PQM I d 0 k 4 LOCATION MAP of NTS R� LEGEND: -- SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY UNE ' PROPOSED LOT UNE - I �•m EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET, TO REMAIN PROPOSED CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK ip PQ PROPOSED STORM GRAIN INLET I d ! I '® EXISTING POWER POLE WITH GUY WIRE, TO REMAIN i� , i6 ( !n PROPOSED STORM WATER INTERCEPTOR (6 ( ( EXISTING WALNUT TREE, TO BE REMOVED . T g E i CENTERLINE !� 19 EXISTING CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK .. 4 - - - - - - EASEMENT � < \ D4 EXISTING WATER VALVE, TO REMAIN P.S.E. PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT �o \---__--' Ie� i � EXISTING LOT LINE y 'I FLORAL ARRANGEMENT VESTING ----- EXISTING CENTERLINE RAVENSHOE SPAY —:to✓- EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR i FLORAL ARRANGEMENT, INC. - I6 ! I n I I EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT - EXISTING STREET LIGHT, TO REMAIN - - �•m EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET, TO REMAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ip ra EXISTING POWER POLE, TO REMAIN /.i �� - '® EXISTING POWER POLE WITH GUY WIRE, TO REMAIN i� , i6 ( !n EXISTING EUCALYPTUS TREE, TO BE REMOVED n (6 ( ( EXISTING WALNUT TREE, TO BE REMOVED . T g E i 16 ! I EXISTING CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK .. 4 EXISTING FENCE 16 ! 0�0 D4 EXISTING WATER VALVE, TO REMAIN j g - X6'0 itX EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT t s i .— Ie� i � • y 'I FLORAL ARRANGEMENT VESTING !oo • TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION S 03-25 (A PUBLIC STREET SUBDIVISION) FOR i FLORAL ARRANGEMENT, INC. - I6 ! I n I I BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 12 OF THE FIFTEENTH SUBDIVISION OF THE JOHN BIDWELL RANCHO, BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 48, BUTTE. COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS CITY OF CHICO, COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CAUFORNIA - - GILBERT ENGINEERING - 70 DECLARATION DRIVE, SUITE 101 - - CHICO, CALIFORNIA. 95973 (530) 899 — 9503 • ' JANUARY 25, 2005 SHEET 1 OF 2 4 ;Tuesday,'February0S 2005,4F F t �t 4 'All Counter Lana _ .Person -Lana Payment Date ' 2%7/2005 Receipt Number X419427 pme,nNi t�S66es - • �s ,��. s'9 o z " KING DIVISION;= ver off{ DDS Planning $0.00 (General Fund) Public Works $0.00 (Land Development) EnvironmentaL.Health $0.00 CDF (Fire Department) $0.00 NOD / NOE ' $0.00 (Recording Fee)iL �� T Aunt Minnie _ $0.00 $1, 500 or $2,000 - Planning, Review / EIR _ $0.00 Received From .. ;Mariposa Vista, In—c. Applicant. {; Floral Arrangement, Inc. Application Number . A05-16 or In Reference To, Parcel Number ' : 015-250-044 Check Number /Cash, Funds ($25.00 Fee) , Cell Tower .- $0.00 ' 1($2506.00) To,alaFe�=�.�w $1,531.'00 r 9€t ,�..4.a. Fish/Game $0.00 ALUC $1,531.00 (Airport Laiid $0.00 ; Non Sufficient Funds ($25.00 Fee) , Cell Tower .- $0.00 ' 1($2506.00) Public Sales / Copies Olhar ?,.r M -- $0.00 $0.00 E COUNTY OF BUTTE OFFICIAL RECEIPT 41942.7 OFFICE -OR _gfEPARTMEffr. ISSUING RECEIPT -7 20 Received fromL—�l 1. Ile Sum of For Received: CASH CHECK DAVC0 BUSINESS FORMS • (530) 7438511 Form 75702 ......... . ............. ... ....... . . .. ....... ....... 9 COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE:' AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROVILLE, CA ATR NO 01954 RECEIVEDFROM PLANNING BAG: 330 DATE 21812005 FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE: AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE:: 218 RECEIPTS: 419413-419436 PLANNING ADPL FEES, GENL 0010 440MI 42109M 101001 50.00 Project Number Amount of Fee AM038-220-013 ROLLEi 3H HIX-UP $50.00 DOCUMENTICOPY SALES GENL W10 440001 4719910 101001 29.60 ff n���Rrqject,Number PLANNING GENL 0310 44 1 46172.41 101001 1,331.00 tAmount of Fee gAP�:01-2-2wIIVC4FL14L Af2I�t11Gii�TjAC? 16 ,9,',339. 1� FOR 217 TOTAL $ 11610.60 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER By: By: r �! white --treasurer pink --auditor canary --depositor golden rod ---file % r � f [MK K � ...`"-� - v ! a.. ' � y'•. 1• fi •wi. � + " � • � • • r � • r•6.�.•' •r+.• .r •r c a 1 r � 1 .f 3 1�ii� . •"-i ' :.•a�'� � �ti �. i I ♦ :�••:•.. ►i: �• i+, � so Su S•yyy �� f .: � .3 ��+ - . • 4 s '. �.t � s � r •°'r r r •rlt • + r.�. • • �r r �, AvL•i�� ,'• • • .. , �•' I. .... .. ... • �. r �?;,r 1 a t -_,.qn 'tier'+• nr' • r•.r•. •11} •.• P ♦. c i •'•r••t•� i i•••r::II •• • '�y a n ,p 4-.:-a--�I : A . i' �►l l'�.. C �:::� •"••71rru,...�. - 'f3 't' �`l �!•r•� •1r1R� r: •r f i fie., k + i. .�'- •. . • �.. .., .•,.," Cdr.. � .►'�'"• � '., +s�"^� .1 ;�s �;,,� '' o-• �►r_ •.�, �.`-r.�ilis. •• 4"; � ••• .'.�.i ''s • ��M r•r . �V' " 3 �: : • •. �• IM�� s .s, 7 • ,�.-r�''.st• }r -Mai- foe aie - � e • � • � j "�, � �;� � a i. � { , � :; �1•tv.IQ�W � a.� ••' r s� 1, 5 'rti �� 1 +:. f `� - � • • 1•%•. 17 i'.... ? ••KQ Q• n R.,�•••••• • u",•�r t!J �r7.;e�asa� ` �+ • • r••• r •••• •• •4 M1 .. • 1'r i• r • i ,1•H•rr.r•, � _ Y� (�. s+"�.�JFd rr.r•�• � i••• r�f�• • .. ... ••• "��: +b • f'iir• t y • 'a��ei JJ�1II 1.� .+ •ir �.�r • � Ecr ''•r - _ �� Avg Idn f�4,. .0~ 'fir •NO .� n; ': :r`•,''• •;:.: ... j »e:♦. xa� �. LLJ r Mai W-3 r ` - '°e,80t �scca•sa sassSa�a=BI _ �,.,,. .,..�;, ...=...:1 ... - Y i !.f It ,F ♦ y / R r.Ot • '`a•0 air. id INnw Ab td .••' �i ti y �: o l H ' V£ 1, :� • • r Y f. • r• t cJ��i �••` 1 •Q: F' • �.. -••ria•-°� • �� '° ��°. { ti' +� .• Ssd• - J sem. h''f e � # !♦ � � � • f,.. °. �05� • i :f�►if. �• A •k? �a�d_ J?�,. i A : re7.� (�T Imo• ••q. - • •••1• • ♦"' 4. ��. ♦ • • i °••• ° i j•°• ° �°•° • `� _ v ,1•• '•i". _ •. x. ,rY.t�c..�1 •. .16 _t;.� p✓l �..l.. � ...- f`�Ik!J ,. ^l� J.. ,:C°•��• i i��� M,°w•. �°�• •� �' A Jy •lr ••N• • • • °• �,� ry ki� �' ..� ••-�n•1► fh :: µ ,.. �« -r•r p s - i r'f'- °W r �•�•• �. 1 1 •► .• • �fi••iis. °° i p �•y .!,:x Tom° �p►°�• .. i. A � ;:r. iv .• rr� •N�P1N....., A h k � r �°'•• � •y.' • i°°°. �. r•I � �.y, K •• ti't•••.•AiiS: ;•r.j .•�.. i� � � � + • �fp• • D a� af.�'£�1�° •ori • �, uts`Iaid,Titl► ;+'-w;: Sri .:-�:� .ted .x ..;;:�1 Z K y 3. ►'i. . i � ��• �' • • i' � �`Jf`Y � �+•.,, .'i >�°�� Z�ly }ice ••.°°t a'.jta. �_ „x_ �••• �• �� EOZ t •• �/ i •r.r a �•' '�:�xtv.pfi�yE x ���r� `` t � "��,• •° °�•► •' `••� i { ^'•. .•tt...'+• t L .. '••�..K���Q� d: C ��f•.. • _ i/JN. �}Y � i°• �°i �° i•'°° • •1 '•.'',.. +v�rf. Yiiii t y 1 .ate li{It7: �+ °.► ��•i • ��•�°'° ♦ i •.. •.• ; i ... .� �' i •• i i i• ' , '. �� ...� y . � • ° err• � r:' '�,, r X. zzi 4 •• R vv4ff NOl tr oz • •.�'' y^:,�,•,Y.•' .I,.•"� !fit' :1 . r ,o,, aid• iv I N n w. 00 a !moi ' • VE AD . �• 7 i sy w•r •� s IV ; •: TL 'ILA 7-j Al, 7711 qL r Op VIA. jr, 2s vse-1 *.N v Nacrd NFd .......... go .�QS - --------- D.A w7!1 '•' � i �•„ :et�L71LJLLO1ID Sw ` .V,: • y .s�• �tl`yiq���- 1 • .•• . �• ••• •w •/ to .,!, ........... ib .......... ............. it f ............ —.w—o 10awe ............ Oa ... .... ...... .............. • 104, ar7v iv 40 a I V.. V DIN h \W . . ........ ..... 7'5OZy. `♦,.1 nfr .. ••.r • •1. 1•i g�4i F►•. � , •• ! Q4 "�I: • t+r •...� �•• ♦ •_. � ::..rte C • s n}•. �[ 41 Id ,f a ��_' � � v' =>�•d.'r . . v �frw y _. I � ♦ is • • • � �--+� � • ,I i�I° .'. • i^' « .'•• Q �.• :.. .... M, • • •,' t•'r+�� r••n •�_ ►. i - • •� 5 •�y ♦ ) .. ! • 1.• u IV ^� • • . ♦ Nr��j am �^ . . H ; -• ar^•• a • ` a . [ = 1. _� _ - .,1 • r�1iv �J�t t" £�i♦ _ �:`�y O �ki°�nv •f •. Ste•' S `�1 n t• /� ��� '�-� '.:��� �L Aomit .•_ ... �+� r.-_.-_ sw ti� �: �JR1t(ty(J"r'j •fir �� t�\V ♦r �..� •�: • -;4,0 t�^.• t-RUL IAIMM ori ra . y / �r .�� rw� s���•,••� .• .+ �Yf Tj' . •.. • , � ..� � � _ . •' a i •_' � t••• :mow• •••wl r ••f41• 3 �' • d• .."• iri *.. i •' EOL Ylo • •.` f. .. .•, ••. V F jy'3 .sr.•I•• .• y• �1.. . •.fie• ,' V • -j' • � • i••r �• •'�•s Y ••� i•r a� 1 OZZ v r •e• ,���'• .... Vol If.3 101 • `y"���'•��usssssss a•s•swaa:� 5 4, Linz— OZtoe we1 .000 -S 0 8IV, ivy iNn • ' r: IH 1 r•� � � � • 1 �• �� v Z W � 1 :.. .. ���^.�•.5 »� • '^ gOt `-IV!t -go '�HSVd' P it A � oy �� -, s �e - +�N?.'�p�N _ • ''i �, � �'' p � .. � • •• . "moo®•„e s r` - -elf fl ti�i.oa r., so. •'• �+ SCJ.• e• • 3el 4W*,A 9'c�.. aJ tti � �e a" 0 • n "'�Av .. Sri • � : t _ n ' � ��'�� + �� . ° S • � - • r' �,. .Goa .. � �, 4 � .ea�.ot � t.a� ,. .y s �� ae�e� t •�� I4ai�c. '1A ,Rf� } '�� •�\� • `��e a� ............v�. • /� ) y J• i29tR1" d ®�y�•C*s •.W.•, f� Jit ;-.: r�� 1 •��a �• � • AIS N/d/i • • • •.�~ '�lr/\ �. t� -�9a�o •�"• ►y�'•ys"a 'f" j' a � f�0� A �wMn�1yy •^ xCla a Zed •ti•'r-=�'•Yi {:_ ••�',�P' ®C ,a•�®may �y Q)SgyA ��� .. �•�:. • : 7 o P ,� �s • sad as *aa• "� '' y® .� •fie ... � eee o � 4ee b DZ ••,{!�—,�_ �, ��ssacsass a:saseps..� • ♦'� �9r2 e �M ami: i+�.s•.a � .r•.�� i t �' M t' cot `. '� ��ia�� � 4 p ,gyp •- • �� loz we <' �_,00 a'Iv ,% '40 aib'.. IVVi. INfIW o • ', �. -Vt;. vj t. Ilk i AV v •Aii, to At ... .... G1a4 la•• AV. •.• *,I 34 I ZAV Nldn NAI 9 A, -*W IW Xe .• OZZ N— a vQ& owl M0.1 va oo� n" ............. io ib goe ............. .'.7 . ........... ---------- oa ........ .. .............. At 7 ................. .. . . ...... Dd C) 40 jL LL tJ 'A 34 1 i E ,Towel 18 ""' ♦�p MUNI AL qI �`R• . ,O `•. ,' • ALE ='200U 't • • f Vis• -------- '-- ------ ---- —BM 201-- -- • / { i� p:. '•.• It i sass ���,..,. . t•sa•. assn essaaaei s•--6 LZ lb �.• -; .... ., rte.' '� `''• �i;.. J jE ATOM R AQ .•••... -,.. ♦ .. _ BDY vt Ni • •i i� "� •` • �• off.•• O' `i • i • .. '}•J: o • • %y O ft :' „•> •..• pis. • i • TtBil t �t ••�.• •.�,: •�••, i•, ti ; •r'-'�INF.'. D. Pa' .......1 r -� ..� r•••• •• ,� •w .. • • •• • • • 9 e SQg)IjpjgjOrj''. •• � ,,, ♦•.e�, is � � r� �•�• �' • v tj° •� � .•� ,�':. ,, tf �•*•e • � • �w!•:• rr� Y ^- 4 ..- {f� L. � f��.,ly. � 1�� �AC.�911Mt4►'• � 3 '�� fir' s '•-.. - ', ••. � 46A .. AVE��•�T' • '; 4 o iia! !@3 .,r • • i; ,u• • �. Y.+ •�.•.v � � /• 41 r i• • •r•' . �.; •• .' � .�. • z ' • ' L • F; Q • ^"'Th.. �tR� `, F� �� r •i i p �! �•r••!•••1••!••••,•••iY� .•••. a .: � ,� idol 1,..� i • �a .i•�' J ~ � 1 ._=1 �• wr.iir•r i �! •.rria • ' • •,• • • ••:r• •Vn'ltlo • i• ••fir �4'° �i � i . • �' Oki::lk b'e�� i i••r �:.•. ; �i•�• iii . '� �.� �•. ..'i i. I ...��. �'�1 ,- :,t 1•F' /� ti� � r. t._..•. _._... ....: ,.a<'a ..,� ....a'✓"`� s205 _..,7";•}.�z.'6"�+cS:. _ .._ . . '� _.:6J 40L� �' • 'mss: "� � •'F• •♦•� •• •:•: ��♦c rr ,S,• a I . s«• •r f •a• . ,� � N.f �•.. • • •�• t �♦. • \•�••. •r r1+• iia • • i �•x• ••�r ' wHtlYd` e�� i a � '•• !'�T•�ej/'�• .., yc nsa.• •a•rr••.r••."•r: t ,.. - Y•-.,.-_-'� ' -` 1 ' � ? p../l 111:, `-.r••. r; �.w• L• •• � • • • : r • • • •' : �r f � } • .w ;�` i " -, � .. ..:.N .� ••• • •. �• <:,{1♦A!1• rii` E ,••/ :^ • i T••♦.� '•.1'�p.�r0 tF 1 ♦Itkn ukr01'i3Av Sri • ..n,. ^� _ I(i ' , • �� r•'• ami woq -, 'a,.,.; t �%�..:.� `•�•..HOLSISIQHfIS � . v. �.^• ,- z 60+: Xe, a..•,•. ' r •� i r.. l •t• ••.• . ...........`��"�a ._� w••s y : f• !• ,tt 3 `• iii:• • : �•�• �• • � i ag 14a i� ...S. -l!, • a • i 1' . `'- •••. •� M. ts,r`►y .v.r� qtr♦•�rr•�•• � �i •• �: .i +t ,.%� � ..r,.r 7dtf •� ,• •:.r �i i i••t�r� `,',�r i i•• ~ mol V3 AG a .. •• • 'y •� �'•rr�•i irk �•r•. r •*�•• � '. •. • � .. y.+.• ��,v.::eOiaiaaccsss sassRs�Rey - .. .... •• •�` 00 .. 'ao ailb'.. Idy, NnA. Oa PI ,iNAj , • '�—_—'" � � �, r ��` � � :,;° • �E� '�;-�-' �•.•�,�(eQ)•�-_�� ,fit Pq' —.�__ �.•-� - _art;." .a-.._- ---7 Pk «_«3 -- �,t•• es�n ��.t• a-ce'a' A01— Ir 44 >, I I E i \ s S �t, 0. a s' • A ` d • • NPN ti"Po O a •R u ro 3Av . , • � - Sv3 • .r i � •'. - � Z - -----" fid' . iAwt r v Z •s ��•� ' 1 o• s ------------ •='':" ♦• .. AQLIllIILLQiL7 ^ ` �Jt t'n rJ- • •' f� \ \ �+ �'A b•f!®'�` &•�.d♦ .i/ ' EOZ11 o ' .Y., .I AY' NI /1 • Y (� • A\...U�u�o �D 9� i � • `.a � tri 0• •♦J� ��i � �.l .. �' 11r, "u,SJi1/ 'hwyh l ", • • .' 4� p j�.•�1 Aa P••• � s. � �,� �. � ••< � �•ou ��♦ ass° e• °O o OT p A2tc� 7� •+y°•80isissasas sszasRs�e• e -. •� .7;A u M •� I • i�q_�� i .+!� �'. fe IM we IN �..,. • ' �♦. • / ..`. .. o ., ... • • ~2iA N I FJr. l b I N I •. { Ob W I•. ' f' ��� �:t /2 � rte•,90 '` � �`'•`•r > • �-•r• �s�% i.• f � a �g<fi. •. • •':� ', ;� iiir s!�. � •-�^ I.�ii �••ii�•�:i ••r r fi r.v.� , �,1 " � • •.••. ♦moi qY •.•• •q"�'•• -.bit ' .•• i• • • i• • • T V^ jt•.••• •,•'•.•• i+ •.' • �:.. ••i••• • �r •� } +, �. i`L" a dmf_• - _t-_ ! �•. .�....�!� ° r1�-• V✓1F1✓. A.•.. �/[ai� 1� ''•.'r .t .ii •�••-.ZK:q..•n•.,• y'�n• .� ��•��1 .. , •.••4 1 �...J..ltv�fh '• � •►• •• rc •iiiiit. �•�i� Si' �- •••i 4 '�ti'a �� i•V '`�r�•i e•V_ ly � .1 ` _•r f •..•u..• aa .yam' 4 •. • r••• 1 1 i� s� 1 °^•• ''• • � �.:i1 � ; ti is ..r'�,Q�.pr : � 4�H. -.v S,. r *'�• •r f � _ •y p 7Q Y: •�• A / •'' ►• _ .• w••* •:'ii.`BBBYYiittWWpp'' `I ♦ • •. • �• £gl •��•�' ;^�'J' H'.L.c•X•.••r!� � • , v{; � ; *3 •c iiaµ � a J 7. :0, • � �� r^ p •iii usM�d3ity •:. •^ :T^S•':, - Sr13 %:n 1� •^ s _. e I .� .`ry, • 'Y ..,�11 x i i �' . •• - � z • a - d ♦ r ..� � • I i+':�, ,i= S '�' ..ii..•.t�y i'�w � . t- - a' •rn ' •;+ r •`s'Y i-.lrr.�' �3 �tI •s Y� a ""Z' . ' •wiii:i � t $ �;1_ x y, �� ' •.'•�i �" • • ~ �/ = i.. _ ...f �• ff! 1 y.�' •.A�!!•y:`'°;'! . �3 t•;t'. •ry, •, ��'�'• `j4,s • :+rt r C 0. i..• `+ '��ytMn{Prw}Q els.sR.> •rs\i y •• • •.A. bo ty... %' 1 `l� ' • �•.NO��Q� PSE' •.�s1 • • • • i""•:^tz • r Y/Jia�r�,�`��� s. ��+ •�•••. • ' . i•• • •1 Wd EOZ We t : ».'.• 3AV 'NI /1 ♦ Y i`. • �,, '•s 6 +� �i �•� , ;.L . •y - � � K:$. .^� '�i, � rya•®�i' ,• • � i•�r�'�•�•�.. "�•�•. � • ,, �"• . a.. , V v':e • art rt . O• •••'• . °i it :�••••••`L A'•W-bbb • a �. i 'tib .••••: i• ." . dil MOA W3 ••• i "i� ozuv *• • ' . ♦ �, ••: try A� asaca cas ssss.q'..:a '• j• .. ••' • ��'• ,i a� ,•: ; toz we '' "'� %- :,�✓�^ fru=•*-;,�ozr b �.- ,•-' ,000 _ `• ..tt� t t T ot. ..8. Q, aib'•• IV iNnw t ` �°:y� � � � \ `•: ,� oo � 'moi'•' � �:_ - � . 'a' w y .-� •;` t .. .;... icy •:: . ......:.... � R• .: i•t � - M � r _ 1}... 4�Z .,- -.. r e.- •eef.••°, rp _ r" •�. r ,� -..� Q.7IHa✓J Lam. e•. +� S' ♦, ,:.-•. �•.�r.•• •. t • O• .• R e .•...-• . r ti �• ' KT' A _ , ..• •••♦•• o •iiieii. •�i •t ••• • �• •i4f•Gw-• . ,S � H .t of •'..s iy r ' c � • ;, �,�tt • i ;t"'..0=. ';r•• w• _ •r, i 1. � , • ; p..�.._ .rs.{ ,� �7RK[.��� y .. ::�• til e j t� - •• • r•°.�•� ra 3AV Ng to .6 +• :err - .•+ b Gr : i .• , . :• 7 ' e • • to O • :::. .. • ., ��. � �:�.....' . Cep _. - ��r �� • ••.ii :•i .'•'�•�.•• �• '- Ote XCIR ....., .. * . ••• : •• :• ••'�• Mfr'. i �•'• ••••••' OYOd opt MOA V 14 of .. , W ... ; let • ' H IN `�� �' ice' rf �f ..... .. .�� �� ;� • ; � •. -f �� + E'>! /2 t } + �' t wt i M " • • ♦ • ••. • a � mow• • w • o • tt. tL Y .i�•••��•�•� •� � � � r � '� aft .��•j •. ♦y�+. u � � - S • •• • • • �• • • � ' � C ' '�• � » . � F-..�F�,•'• .. • r • mit I l � N • t� 1 �l fl x+ • � • i •!•• ios 1 �•� �•• 1 -'•- 1. t '5. �.. ♦._.••.l • 'Y -i•re ♦ ♦ .••1 •�•"A +�.}' t •< �, gn,L�q,a } .. - .1is ti� • •• ,• "••i•iis• s• 10- 6 .•'• s �...,*y 4••► M►• f t t ,•� t p ••-I •• • -,i f � ¢ �y • fa•s.. •.� -"�"`�a♦ = 4 ;, taa-• • 1 • } • s•..� - a�C. '� "�• h - f •:.• �.; �••�r<� . � . • •• :: •"`� �� • r-•' � ' �ti r. + •- q} �� '1`�, ice. ♦gin ,. • �• + ESL : •,•. �A•^. ^�• A`-� • ' :•, • asp •r=.'.'^'.�•.'_': Si+i'i.�M �.,'4•c'. `.'f.-s. % • s1, r.•:� w +!�1��''••'_ •+� �� :.� •,'•j` yt,.a.. ..�•p Z • '�• J •fi jt{' •a•r••r tt ti-L �.;` t }, tri M1 �•6 ••��•• C • t - ••• j '�:1 !f!•��� _ diw•�.L A.. '�' i ! 3 p -.•� r �•'•:L'1♦ �• ♦ i• ••^� I �-., �.:. •'t...xorsretaans � T 'i3, ..... �g .-y':":• I � •• u.• s,r.� a r9. •. O'+t ��• iii �w i•�•• i ♦1 JCd J •' 1• ,_. ... ?•iii S ��-+:� JajIB)j +` .t •• •i. •.:••i i •••w• . ' O si EOt hie F o ; � - r' '• i • • )I t:.. •. _ sTAV •N! A 3��• L'•�~ 3� ti;�: '�'••° �rr•.+•�•��• � i � • `i »V.�•»•r •'r _ •••• �••• • a• •X, "ads r ••��'� •"t.: �•••�1i::• t. ..f••' �•• O• ; .• . • err• ••. • � • "�•f� • so .. a-'•. ./ !1 i •• 9�-•i••i .•o• i �i•., sem. Oez •, • ..• •! ••t••a•• .Ala fl `'• i �... .... �•�.• f ••.•••.• Otr - MOA W3 f t:. ✓aoz • ';, „•„�•�raaca asa asst sps•!w� It 10a we ��..._.'_.... n.. L.. '0z ; ht. it. D 00 " ''21•A i) t b'. • l d I N R w O I �/• +o� W ,6, r � � 7J/).gyp !i,•t� 00 PI /�1' •,•�; ;i,,• it 45: -wild H v's op A A J-. 0 6 Z Ind .L .NTM Eoz v Nidn ozz dzi OVO& 061 MOA V3 ........... goe ........... .......................... ................. ---------- 7 loz we rZ I N � \W + v P- . . ............ t- - .-Ny.�� ~'••• •,.� r � ' *`•1t • •dam:-. �� ••I�••� /'-•►. •moi �� �� ;� r {� �. ��•io �ti�••�i�. i• / :` l sjr.'r 1 k - �• '� ' . + - . aQ a��s� {{ (�r,lI.11 r,J:, �••. •. s# • •• '• . +7�` • )•� i••• i i •••• • ..•.•. • •J S f {+ �L i' 1 r_'� ;� -nrP � V. -' ..u•••• r • s' • -='1•.•�•v • :•. '. �• rte., • ����r+••;•y •. ';..s L „� T+ •'"OEM tk _ 4�Y -tet:• •„t•.' �••t� '.��,'� :.•• • 1 1'.;'i • j j„... J •i,+iil �f O.. t4 � �� 1 •: t •;/ �• �� � �� r • �� .:��-r ^,�• � � `_+ • •' ` a-. a.,� .�' ! .,•li'M�P�••+n • 'q t . � � ., ' �o . • ; Vii/► • e•••r •N '1 j •11! w•F•�kt • . +; ��--� : SY3�`i• n� ^ • t ��' , ♦r� j • • p` � SAY Z • -. ti - � w r., •• jNsl � . • • ' o�,t:`y •tom ;• �'''�•F.r 3'�. ` '� :�' �� � � � �'••. i ii ♦ '►,'�Aittt.pE��p t •-r� '` a i ^u k • ti ��• R1• � ••r''d�r •• '�• ��': ;1• '' Lt' •'.`,.t � ,w S.. . •r � • �' Ja'}• ts•••t.� . � •f•i ' '• i • r _ r jJ • t y ^ • • -.,Q • .� . a ,.f.- . _ j • !!��'' � •'ft .; •• "tt P ;�` � ,....% ~ i ..lIOISIAIQHflS -� '``: �.�... •e L3 •^ ;r 6+ �'�': ; : ;� �.•.� .� lie _ • •.• • .: .• • .. • ._ ... I `0•*1• -t �.•{"`�.- • s. 't!� 1Jr�l Bl� .• • , � i• � �i i• �' 1-4 •ws .« ia,�J O EOQ.' 1•t8 • u i �% • '�,.�•� : � � . ••a• • •i ... •� c••.: .'.a;; • -. ;ri r -` .� �r • •• •r a � '�•�i• � • •••• •mss r ' �•• r:' .:•:: • ,...ice • • r !�' • i• • i•• ♦ ti t8/ y '�' a•c s sags.+. 77 .: oe _ ,00 -a7v iv INnW Ab Dd CIQ .� '" tier � • • •' f k7` '1%'f^,,. •� , •• • � �. e+�.�r,a••,s a ,� t � s'• i ti � r.••ur• ac -a _ ' Y ♦ '' • i• � EgJ • • • .• P. '�+'' li �s•taC�AtcG •s i S� � • �� p, ♦ •'�wtt11[n�, 2t�. "t :. s. �� � ,� +1!*n uep°�w st+3 • ,.•. rn � ± r lfj ' +r • •► .�P '• o �1 ..+.. � yo 'i 1 .. -�. s,� _ � ` _•t, .•gyp • +•a C •• ...yam s i. -- t ••++1 .,v' •:!Jnttt•i°l'ai2 .,,•.'-"�•• r`•t.N. `f • �� ��1• A� QBiIS • ` ;.. ••., t9 L i `a+ '• • i �!•a i ••• : •1 . ...; '•. iia• S ' ilied a 17..•�J• . 9,•: s'i •Y ••• i� ••l ' '•1'� �. .. ''.t• ,^, .., ••�� • •�•'• � i � �••• �•�•�•+� vA til+••• •a�] NOl V ♦ B�sisacscsa :ssaa,sslat rA OZ .,000 , � 'a.o bIb ld INilw got lop •cava" --� �— _ _..., . -, .� '- ,•• Ej;JIH�� <'iY , • . •,r. • ,, . �.: •+'' .ih '�� 1 � '� •• • y • • .!••• ,. , -� trip` �� I.l ` ', •• ••�► p env •. sr3: ..."r •' s H.Y • , � KJ- • . • ` •.S,• J 'l. � •.i'I�ID1014011D � �►J• �i0 .• �+ • .'. r � i� i • 2 d Irl. < . • . v Nr n • •� � •r lb �, •f/'�•{..� � .• -..... ♦ ..., .,,«.►., •XQ9 ♦. ...•• cul :�' 14 O Z ,.r_:_• ..;,. �........ .....�.. ter � �wi�ie�N1L�+w•' � s•i•ArDi2 %• M .. Y ��,.. -- [Oi r ------------ --------------- oz ---------- ---oz ------------ • oo-,�� - ods �•__ *� '� �. '!do Hiv IV �3 n \w Ilkor a ,anol 1 N ' z W tle E M H'Vd d� OV *%0, YOX- ........... ............ ...... 4tp ........... Poz.ssaaaass zassscot 4 07 I . ............. -- - ----------- T we ................ le. 00OZ7— '00 yid'., �l v I N n \4 10 J 40 14 R. ........... .�,. •y.. .1'• i • moi'•_• . ",� i j • • •`. '. � "• - � � - { �. � • 504 ` •i.#`dl+�' a "_•• � `: i• � .. 'fQ7.\ a 1 7�■, � r•, r •, \ vq.JP O• ¢ s /� ••w -'•"'► •ia a \••r wN+Pi( i •••a ••!" ^,/ A � � ••, _ �t �. a�i • a • • s. s 1+ �A7 - -� s� r � 'f7 w "ii��••• e " S�/ ilas�r • " f" • �• NKsfar� •i = \ • ;.}ir J •Y w J})Ir" H. ' ,� •ym. .tai-< •eri �, yy its s �•� ,� ,t � �k ur�ro''� •n► , . Sv3 • n,: nt ' !sIt- ° s ii + * �+11� 'e•\ t I '• ► iI • t - •i �c�y .y f'"•�'�i, sisi E y R r � t� • •�■�a ,•Y.+H v'Iifl1Ut �J)[ ,•v �r�"3' d•■�t� •.. ;O r•," ' +r :'• ! � •�..� Qg� � ••"...• a ill-. L`F� ��+, ••�%•••••M••• • •1 • iia, .qi�G ,•m►•' 4 - (�- �lfd •r � � i e• •,• ••• ... '-• "� Mem: 4i. r • y. •". • •i.: •_ •,:•r 10 • '1. -�, ,TAV NId/1 • • Y r • \!�� r � �Wia i � •" .. 1 .•.• • + - •• •:� ��. :a•m"s .':,i,• � i`r".gym•' i �; • t ••. � ••�� � �.+ • • t• O'• ; "[ • m .fir• ■ i ra • �p ��• • m • �*• �• * ••• • •« Oo'Ctl NOlY • i ,. ' , ..G"-r�•�•••A--•-O•�Z•ssmramss ►:wswss:Q/ .• .. �• {4I_•'.v\1i. �' `Y-i•• • � +� m t .ems ••t ••' _ O. ` Qli .. toe we ; t• • Z 1 • oopwnw 81V v • O ee / /� -+ '•p W •F i otp 1.4 '1 ,.+•- u ' i '0 4 , � • 1 1. ri V ` t: i• �• \ J �t 34 v 111 � ) } � �•---- i M 2 t� ` `• Tower b 40 • t� ' s �' - MO N1 AL -AIR ALE �GyO 00, +:'•••,..•:.mac'. i BM 201' 20 .. .. M .... •.� j.�}r•� • . •` i.tgass•m es•.eeees•'�•":� .,.2ZB�p�� +° •:~ "'',•�1 �• l83 208it EATON R 0 M•.•H•• . 5 • •� • \. •� 1- Ib • . moi, .�• •', _ - :ij\__•'' •: _.\.• Sr -7• '•i S •• i• � • :° i• • • F Y Q •� ... ori �•�•• • :••••.• •. . ! •• �4! .• • • • �,• �M �3� ;.i efr'_ '..N': .. awe '� •°••: • •'• `� [railer .ark� : , V '�. . � „ •RAL, -10 •%fie • .• '!+. ��lJ �• f' AN•; iNP�Aanlncr' .�•.•'.. _ ..+s 1" y �,� "�:�� ; t `'��••' '� _s �x - 2'� v s! WCC .'vim ii �� • AVS y; . O ,: • 'l\ • r f% r ►• >'M _� , fj ' FSP •►. ° a ;•`e• •Jd3 ,4''� ► •• t it �' �ri•• �i•s•r.� : _ s e"ti, +���•,� •••" ••.•� i �'' • r tae .r �µ� rri • r • • i •. �, ••.• �V141CV , r•••r*•�• •�*�•a�'r :••• 'l �� ♦i. •�•• 1 •iIj •:•••• • �. H�'t1 �� ,4.1p�{�1. 1''S 1':•: i ' = ''.•� "' :'�'�•' ' ..t. ` --...:}li � !' : �iit�:::• �I�a X205 'n^ •'___._..._�. k. . ,._: �• at <. -e• elm ..� � - � l� - �� . "Y,_ y �� � •.• •• �_s.-... -�•� � ,•�• S ,A�� �'� '�� L • Y ! .301 • , , .. X\Vv�. win �j• fl :�,� ♦¢F� `i `��a '- — ti � 1 � � •:tea a , Vo tot Aag 1 � ''•8Q Q4{!$ ei. +vamr �� �n�\ �V di� • ro� b l ®y�•1 • • •ti � „• �' ? � � _ S .b _ -a Sd:,�CIY rove �®��o � a� • e • tic ` � a ap,• " a? pF..• .`� • •' 7 , - •1 .1 :•1/ NI h � • � Y 1` �. ��:�� ���• iia., r•���� a ve r ' �• �" •••• ' a '.. � ••�' ! � 9 7+•7�c•CT°acr.re•>� rya• �: � ,••�+ • • •�. ?dab or®• �� �.• , a � � " � �"� m a•o�'e os�y roc., . �°:� •� 1 A' OSA ��•roV '+•f• �/.�^ i \ ' Q tel 44 (���++��,,��� .M �'�,••8�eiaacaoss: zr:sa,sas� - �. loa we aiV.., id itinW ' 061Q. ti yavoi ' H "'iii•... � 1 /i f�� '� ": Y• � .:.��.:_�._. • ..i ". �' J/ �"-��,'-' \� ` „ � �"�� � @p��; • � fes, r/.�• .� � �• � . g---.. - � ,.y -._ _ .,c _--� .•- W i 9t '.P' T• .l ♦ � + a }- n� A t � �• , `�'. i'a,f arm*�'«� ao•+ � -• _ �' �„ �. �, � � • Y•.;� !�•• •� a. ,r £�/•••�As��'}�1`''' © • R a u ""BAY . SY3 ,� � �� - -- - - A� � •, al _ '% zz • d;.. �•� ... ....KO��Q� ^�' - - \� + ®'L Y;•4• www i��3• �A cot wo IT— • r a a .. �_ .1 •—� •. •.ire, �• �� •}�� :e• ww ��,a` + ,w`•��} • -Pwi• }• .• s - .BUY •e � 3� 'ifs wf• Pf• � • � �� f� � eti �U ��.�a3f'i tU 'A. •� °.•yam /�+ .•H.. ••., 1 �,,., � ` :::: �� _ .... •... a r' a 1 Hol v o oiuv e<w✓A� Let f ■+,,._ - . ♦ ,�,iC'��'�-.��samasss zssssMw�sl. ., we ...5�••9 <�- �a '•.� ; ems•.` .'., •.• -•� Jz..- ,•- t an �'• f � � � � � I Y� .l 1..1ttt��� o m (� �/ � ,tel ``•.i. -,, � rV,. (py9y ~ .� M• .. BOL --mm r- 1,i :..... .. 46*4 Sri �; M • �, nv nrr pu ��. a<• s, s;.. r !,' ` c� 02up O .. ' . • ,�'�T,•'.'•�B�•r�sacawss .awe«��:� —�;• 2 • or- ioa we- - - 1 j R# z ` INnw ` t OlIp bit ♦ t � e ' .� VE \O .`moi\.� -'..- ' �J 1'-• ��• �/ .y ,. '�� /� p `�, ` f , atr+K:. _ K - - _�soz a Q-� +� t �n F F t • i`•.� • P 0�''4 s Y ' wt- s • op ZC .. ff ,. 72 ?�. .r a ,d�®� • ,�� r, t ��id--`' t � i• � ,. � • ! 4 � �'' �; ♦ . � c t as <. *� AW 7 0 • Aa 11 • �� •� �' •� C,�� - f� - .�"•� • • • ^; c���� ,fit ♦ '•t •.•• a � � ��• �•,� � v1 e� �� t �• • � � "3,•..,d : _ _ y,�,�\� �', • - • � �\rid �•` •Ep��s CC l.�S:j �E ; 1 � •'° f0• ��� •' � x { � �� `� ;v.. ��:s� •r � ♦ \e• r `a.R� �;s •`� . �► a ,•� f •� r --� N P�sl 10 Kin _ ♦ < + -« _. ; �. - •� �. � ��. - ..,•-awa• � � ♦ 1, vot 77 • • � .•.., • '/ � ..... '� • ° +.. ll JD7�14fllLl � � ri .. ,• • • Z •-•• � � �J¢� \� � •�' �� ��; ter• ,. � . i .>., f ��•• 3 1 • R • ttt F ..: • •� • Ary � • �, �pt• Rr• • M ♦• yl ' d . • ON! i i.=!� ° , J� �;?,' ti. ! O, ?' o a,F`a • R��, � t� twp•• 1 ��wr E�a.♦ "\ �•' •.• O rod o WO. Y r . • Co • ••,•. ' ° '�eoz reg '••t ' r y�/r,; �� �R�aaas Rss ssss �saa..r a• `L _ _ \' �•� +✓'`r,`'�:� Iii c .. • ,. r • oz coz we a /. ," ' • 000 =� ; ,�! � • ... \� E 6 \W � � r'— / �� �/'' • � ae � W .w.":tea ♦ � •. J' 06 W avol fW ,-. ,,� ��; � �._f �� �,�• , i eye `� `tet r i.a o z �+�•-.�.J/r� a ... -411 /• ROJECT SUMMARY SHEEO FILE #: A 05-16 AP #: 015-250-044 (prior 048-300-044) APPLICANT: Floral Arrangement, Inc. ADDRESS: P.O. Box 617, Chico, CA 95927 OWNER: Same REPRESENTATIVE: N/A ADDRESS: N/A PROJECT DESCRIPTION / LOCATION: Floral Arrangement Inc., Butte County Airport Land Use Commission consistency review of the Floral Arrangement Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, City of Chico. The property is located on the west side of Floral Avenue, north of East Avenue, opposite Ravenshoe Way, Chico. (SB) DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential 1. A lication submitted: 2/7/05 Amount: $1,531.00 Receipt # 419427 n Photocopy of deposit check received 2. Comments (sent to / received from): 3. Staff Report (date / prepared by): ❑ Staff Report in file 4. Published: (date / specify where) ❑ Hearing Notice, if published 5. C Commission Hearing(s): nAgenda Action taken: ❑ Found to be Consistent ❑ Found to be Inconsistent Notes/Special Conditions: 6. ❑ Minutes CLOSED FILES: ❑ Billed out $ date ❑ Received Check Amount: $ Receipt # ❑ Sent them Refund or ❑ Check box if County-initiated—"Exempt from fees" K:\Planning\ALUC\BILLMGS\PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET.doc •Monday" Febr6ry 07, 2005. Development Services e PLANNING DIVISION-., 'Ver. 1:0 -1 �Check Ntiffiber /,Cash 115 R6C6iie Al Public SabEis'/ Copies $0.00 Other: $0.00 $0.00 ALuc $0.00 (Airport Land'U-s-e .Non'Sufficient z $0.00 unds-"r 25.00 Cell -Tower. $0.00 1($1500 00)'-' Public SabEis'/ Copies $0.00 Other: $0.00 I ti } f i. ry z . PROJECTPROPONENT'(TO BE COMPLETED`'BY APPLICANTS Date of Application January 27, 2005 Property Owner Floral Arrangement, Inc. Mailing Address: PO Box 617 Phone Number 530-894-6099 Chico, CA 95927 Agent (if any) Mailing Address: Phone Number PROJECT: LOCATION 4 (�TO BE CGMPLETED BY APPLICANT : Attach'an accurately scaled ma '=:showing ihe.relationsha ; of the ro ect site to.the aar ort'bou.zdary and runwa s. Street Address West side of Floral Avenue, north of East Avenue, opposite Ravenshoe Way Assessor's Parcel No. 015-250-044 #urA QW-900-OW Subdivision Name: Floral Arrangement Subdivision Zoning: R-1 Parcel Size 1.25 acres± BUTTE COUNTY FEB 0 12005 DEVELO I% NT SERVICES PROJECT DESCRIPTIO` b COMPLETED BY APPI'I T)' v� .• ,k '^. 3 �hfa L;-. ,` a r' ', z s`,•�+.�i't�i�` �'?" . �. � a .+a. ,x �^'�'F y Rz. .. +� ,. � *s � ., if applicable„ attacdetdaled site plan showing group' &elevations, th "e location of structures, open spaces, and water bodies; and the he'iglit of structures• and trees jnclude additional pro 'ect,descri tion data :as needed .f Existing Land Use (describe) Vacant Proposed Land Use - (describe) Single-family residential subdivision creating 6 lots and public street with urban improvements. For Residential Uses: Number of Parcels or Units on Site (including secondary units) 6 Lots For Other Land Uses:' Hours of Use: N/A Maximum number of people on site: 15 y Indicate the method used to determine this number (i.e. Church membership, number of parking spaces, etc.) 2.5 persons per lot' r •' Height Data: Height above Ground of Tallest Object (including antennas & trees) 35f ft. "a Highest Elevation (above sea level) of Any Object or Terrain on Site 254 ft. . {. Flight Hazards: Does the project involve any characteristics which could create Electrical interference, confusing lights, glare, smoke, or other Electrical or visual hazards to aircraft flight? 0 Yes ® No A s Does the project have the potential for attracting birds? 0 Yes ® No If yes to either, explain,below: 4 } r r } r REFERRING AGENCY ( B3 QMP;LETED BY AG'E Date Received / - 2 -7 -05' Type of project: Agency Name ❑ General Plan Amendment /�LF�„�.✓/i,/Gi a.✓r Sion/ ❑ Zoning Ameld,Variance,Rezone Subdivision Approval Staff Contact ❑ Use Permit ❑ Public Facility Phone Number 0 -7 9 - 4 v o -7 ❑ Other Agency's Project No. V'Es�„-jc, re;iZ47tVAC �I Signature licant K:\Planning\ALUC\FORMS\APPFORM.WPD Date ✓Z7 0&