The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About039-550-095Butte. County Department, of Development Services 4 Planning Division Airport Land Use Commission . July 20, 2005 Meeting AGENDA ITEM — TO: Honorable, Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: Mark Michelena, Associate Planner DATE: July 20, 2005 ITEM: 2004/2005 Ranchaero Airport CLUP Update. ' Background The following is a summary of the Ranchaero Airport annual review conducted for 2004/2005. Land Use Review'and Evaluation • The following tasks were completed in an effort to evaluate land use compatibility with the Ranchaero Airport: A. No new development permits have been applied for or issued for the Ranchaero Airport (APN 0397550-095) from January 2004 to June 2005. ` B. Reviewed the City of Chico and County of Butte for Tentative Parcel/Subdivision Maps applications and only one application was submitted from January 2004 through June 2005 that was within the Ranchaero Airport compatibility zones. 1. Shastan Homes (APN 042-640-020 and 042-640-021) Tentative Subdivision Map for 57 lots on two parcels totaling 14.9 acres in the B-2 Compatibility Zone. The project was found inconsistent with the B-2 Compatibility Zone by the Airport Land Use Commission on May 18, 2005. The applicant is in the process of annexing the parcels into the City of.Chico and will be moving the project forward with the City. i Butte County Department of Development Services iAirport Land Use Commission i iRanchaero, Airport 2004/2005 Updates Page loft Recommendation' Staff recommends that the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission move to adopt the . following:. A. Find that the Ranchaero Airport has not submitted any applications for development at the airport. B. Further find that only one discretionary application (Shastan TSM) was submitted to the County of Butte within the Ranchaero Airport Compatibility Zones from January 2004 to June 2005, presented to ALUC and found to be inconsistent. Attachment: .A. 'Shastan Homes project site location ' K:\Planning\ALUC\CLUP\2004-2005 update\Ranchaero Airport 2005\Motion to approve Ranchaero CLUP.doc R .. , dry , • ' iButte County Department of Development Services iAirport Land Use Commission i ' iRanchaero Airport 2004/2005 Updates ' Page 2of 2 { Attachment A Shastan Homes Project Site Location ' 1 1 ` S L.72 , B.2 Nr..rav-..se.gi FILE #: A 04-12 AP #: 039-550-095 APPLICANT: ADDRESS: OWNER: REPRESENTATIVE: ADDRESS: PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET t, i T Ranchero Inc. 2599 Oak Park Avenue, Chico, CA 95926 ph. 342-5242 Same. PROJECT DESCRIPTION / LOCATION: Ranchaero Airport update review of changes to the airport and surrounding development. A three phase presentation. The property is located at the end of Oak Park Avenue, 1608 Oak Park Avenue, Chico. DESIGNATION: A-2 (General) zoning 1. Application submitted: 1/6/04 Amount: N/A Receipt # Photocopy of deposit check received 2. Comments (sent to / received from): 3. Staff Report (date / prepared by): ❑ Staff Report in file 4. Published: (date / specify where) ❑ Hearing Notice, if published 5. ALUC Commission Hearing(s): Agenda s; Action taken: ❑ Found to be Consistent 0 Found to be Inconsistent Notes/Special Conditions: r 6.. ❑ Minutes CLOSED FILES: ❑ Billed out $ date 0 Received Check Amount: $ Receipt # ❑Check box if County-initiated—"Exempt from fees" 0 Sent them Refund ' or s K:\Planning\ALUC\BILLINGS\PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET.doc I i t 01 ITEMS WITHOUT PUBLIC HEARING • � �� `. �' �:� a ~tat• -� �.,. .'•c l•t �,, • n.i -, <�i ri: ' - .. .. J. CLUP• Review and Update Mr. •Michelenagave a brief _`summary of the project. .. Commissioner Harp said the Commission had started a discussion regarding the B-2 zone in this area and he was not•sure,the discussion -was concluded.. He asked if the'Commission concluded whether the B-2 zones were appropriate for this airport.at this time or whether the Commission wants to make changes. + Y* • r. '` Commissioner Grierson said he thought this was put on the "to do" list. Commissioner Harp said if we approve this report by staff are we approving the B-2 zone as is at this time, or are we leaving it open to be discussed later. r 'Chairman Wallrich-said under "CLUP'aimendments" it states "Look at the boundaries of the -B-2 zone—'-' -, +R' around the Chico Airport." Commissioner Sherman said all they were doing at this point is looking at_approvals'inade between the 2000 -2003 -and -making "a-determinationtwhether:the actions that have'been-approve&by.the"City. and County are consistent with the CLUP. Mr. Baker said this is correct. ' Chairman Wallrich asked staff to add the Ranchaero Airport to `the "things to do" "ori the B-2 along with the Chico Airport. Commissioner Hennigan said that he noticed the property on the corner of one and three-quarter acres 77 is also for sale. He said the three parcels•are a logical commercial development area, and questioned y why the County would allow someone to build houses on commercial property. w, ' It was moved by Commissioner Sherman,=seconded by Commissioner Harp; and unanimously carried ` G.` to adopt the following, changing the word "hanger" to "hangar": • 1. That the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission finds that the land uses as approved and executed within,the Airport Compatibility Zones surrounding the Ranchaero Airport between 2000 and 2003 are consistent with the Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility''.. s .. Plan. 2.,'-- --Further find that the Ranchaero Airport has added two additional hangar spaces, by removing" one hanger. and replacing it with a larger hangar, and added an above ground fuel tank consistent with the Butte County. Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan: r� 3.: Further find that Butte County and the City c f Chico land use entitlements granted from 2000 to 2003, within the Ranchaero Compatibility+Zonea,-have been consistent with the Butte ,. County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.. sem• .T ,. ✓ ��• �.r Chairman Wallrich asked staff, to prepare letters`'for the Board of Supervisors and the Chico City ■ Airport'Land:Use.Commission;■:MinutesTof.•Meeting'of=March"-Y7 -2004- M-'Page�6.■` 1. CLUP Review and Update Mr. Michelena gave a brief overview stating that this is the second hearing for review of the Ranchaero Airport. He made a power point presentation with a hard copy to the Commission. He said there was a question at the last meeting on whether the parcel to the south could be split or have a second dwelling. He said all parcels that fall in the B-2 protection runway area are all less than 20 acres. He said the zoning is A-10. He said the County does allow agricultural worker housing in the A zones. He said the A zones do not allow second dwellings. Vice Chairman Harp asked where the Pinkert property was located. Mr. Michelena said on the northwest portion of the map. He said it was a 3 -lot split. He said the project was shown on the last map as TPM 03-11. Vice Chairman Harp asked if the B-2 line is a line the Commission wants to keep and he questioned if the line was appropriately drawn. Mr. Michelena said that Floral Arrangement would not have met the density of the C zone either. Mr. Baker explained that the B-2 and C zone lines were developed as a result of the accident scatter overlay maps. Commissioner Grierson said he lives in area B-2 to the north. He said that probably 70% of the aircraft at Ranchaero confine themselves to the unofficial traffic pattern remaining south of the creek. He said, however, there is still about 30% of the aircraft that take off out of Chico and fly into the Ranchaero Airport. He said the aircraft flying over the B-2 area are flying approximately 300 feet above the ground.. He said there is not a lot of traffic along Oak Way near the C zone. He said the Commission may want to consider increasing the size of the C zone by taking the B-2 area and moving it closer to West Sacramento. Mr. Baker said they could explore the impacts. He said they could look at the zoning lines. Mr. Michelena said there are lots that are inconsistent with the zone now. He asked if the Commission would like to see these lots to help evaluate if the line should be moved. Commissioner Hennigan said he does not want to grandfather anything in because it would not deter people from future uses in the area. He said what is there now may be incompatible, but they want what is there to remain clearly incompatible. Commissioner Sherman said the Commission might want to look at the infill criteria rather than moving the zoning line. Commissioner Grierson said the Commission does need to have a discussion on infill properties and surrounding parcels. Commissioner Hennigan said the City of Chico has not brought their General Plan into conformity with the CLUP. He said there is an area on the City of Chico's General Plan that is not zoned commercial, but has commercial uses. He said a Master Plan was adopted by the Chico City Counsel and was well done. He said Commissioner Grierson was to be congratulated. = ■ Ai ort Land Use Commission. �- Minutes of Meetin of February 18 2004, �_ Pa e-5 �_ - — g� i�.. r _ - - -g . -'_ - -- � . / - i: :' - ,.- 1 • • t . Y ` «fir: - S w ,_ 1. CLUP Review and -Update . Mark.Michelena gave a brief summary of,the project -and he presented a power point presentation. He passed out a hard copy of the power point presentation. He noted that two new hanger spaces have been added. He said growth in the area will be discussed at the next meeting.. Commissioner Hennigan said that pilots avoid the housing area. �Y Mr. Michelena said there are not a lot of noise complaints of flights over the houses. He said he has no, correspondence of any noise complaints. - Mr. Hennigan said that realtors have told people, that the planes will not fly over their houses. He said this is not true. Mr. Michelena said he talked to Gary Griggs,, airport owner, and was told there have not been a lot of complaints. ' • F'' , Commissioner Grierson said there could be a potential problem with the house shown on Photo 7, off the end of the runway, if the owner wants to split the property and add another house. He asked if staff thought putting another dwelling in the runwayprotection zone would be possible based on our ' current. standards. - Mr. Michelena said staff would need to look into this. ,a; F Mr. Baker also said the project would come before.ALUC to build another dwelling and the Planning' Commission would have to look at the project very carefully.' - Commissioner Grierson questioned if procedurally there was something that the Commission should' ,n- be addressing. He said he wondered how this would comply with -Part 77. He asked if there -was something the Commission should be doing to prevent a house from being built right next door to the - existing dwelling that would have'its' own 10 -acre parcel. I Chairman Wallrich asked if the Commission should include a comment making the point that upon • the completion of this review, as far as an open item, that this parcel should be identified in the file. .r t .t Commissioner Baldridge suggested the parcel be identified under existing incompatible uses. , Mi.- Baker said this parcel is dealt with in terms' of the policies of the B=1 zone. He said the property ' -is.identified in the CLUP as a potential problem spot.. ^ ' Commissioner Sherman asked if a request for a parcel split would come to ALUC for review. i • Mr. Baker said that the project would be a major land use change and with it being off the end of the . runway, it would warrant coming to ALUC for review. He quoted from Section 235 of the CLUP, A Item c, it states"Local jurisdiction concludes that further.review is warranted." He said as a Planning Department if a project off the end of a runway comes in, he would conclude that the project needs to `# .'come before ALUC. S' Commissioner Sherman noted that it would not automatically come before ALUC: j;- , . , '�.■.Airport-Land.Use,Commissiorri '1linutes�of.MeetingofJarivary'21;;2004■�Page:3k■ Mr. Baker said if this was a 10 -acre parcel that was 90% to the runway, somewhere mid section out, and a two -lot split; it may not warrant coming to ALUC for review; but something off the end of the runway clearly would warrant coming before -ALUC. _ Commissioner Hennigan said that on the contrary since Butte County has not brought its General Plan into compliance with the CLUP, all land use actions, are_ required to come before the Commission. r ' Mr. Baker read Section. 153 of the CLUP which states "Until such time as the Commission finds that the local agency's General Plan' or Specific Plan is consistent with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, where two of the local agencies has overruled the Commission's determination of inconsistency, State law requires the local agency to refer all actions, regulations; and permits involving land, within the influence area to, the Commission for review." State Aeronautics Act Section 21676.5 (a) "Only actions which the 'ALUC elects not to review are exempt from this policy." He said Commission policy is that only major land use actions listed in Policy 153 shall be submitted for review. Commissioner Hennigan asked when the policy was made. He said the County has not brought their General Plan into compliance with the CLUP. - Mr. Baker said that the CLUP states that if the matter is not consistent, at that point staff will bring only the items that the Commission has asked for under Policy 153 which is action affecting land r uses in the Airport influence area, with'a list of things including buildings off of airport, non- „. - avigation issues within Compatibility Zone A, etc. He said he has forced projects in just because he has gone back and referred to Section 235 where a jurisdiction concludes that further review is warranted. He said he has always erred on the part of being more conservative rather than not, and has brought items before ALUC rather than let the project pass without review. , Commissioner Hennigan read Section 152 (a) which estates that "Until such time as 1); the Y Commission finds that a local agency's General Plan or Specific Plan is consistent with.the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan or 2) the local agency has overruled the Commission's determination of inconsistency, the State Law requires that local agency to refer ALL actions, regulations, and permits` ,r involving land use with an airport influence area to the Commission for review." He said it further states that "only those actions which the ALUC- elects not to review are exempt from this policy.',' `- Mr. -Baker said the next sentence states that "only a major land use action listed in Policy 153 shall be r • submitted for review." Commissioner Harp agreed if the project is not a major land use, it does not come to ALUC. y Mr. Baker said he tells applicants if it appears that the status is questionable, he will bring the item •. 'before ALUC. He said he also will tell applicants a project,is not consistent and if not brought into ". consistency, the project will be brought to ALUC for review. He said on the Steedmanproject all } °•may buildings were existing and Mr. Steedman was just splitting the parcel to put the homes on their own . parcels, so it did not come before ALUC. Commissioner Grierson asked about the Pinkertproject.that came to ALUC approximately 8 months 'k ff ago ; • , Mr. Baker said the Pinkert project had the potential of new vacant lots that could have been built on so it came to ALUC for review. Commissioner Harp said staff was not following the rules. Mr. Baker said that they were and again read the list of criteria for major land uses to be sent to ALUC for review listed under Policy 152. Commissioner Harp felt if a project was not consistent with the CLUP, the project should come to ALUC for review. Mr. Baker said on the Steedman project there were no new dwellings and he did not feel it had to come to ALUC even though it was not consistent. Chairman Wallridge explained that in the past the Commission used to be notified of projects like this one. Mr. Baker said he would, in the future, inform the Commission of projects that could be of concern. He explained what Mr. Michelena will be doing for the next meeting. Commissioner Harp said the Pinkert application needs to be put on the list of "Things to do." He said they need the Pinkert project as part of the discussion on the Ranchaero Airport. Commissioner Sherman said it would also be nice to know how large the parcel at the end of the runway is and what the zoning is. Mr. Michelena said he would get the information and according to the CLUP map the parcel did not look very big. Commissioner Grierson said in the past there has been some discussion on turning the Ranchaero Airport into a residential flying community. He said a former Commissioner, Nina Lambert, had some property around where #4 is on the aerial photo, and had talked about the ability of developing that property. He said on photo #6 he seems to remember that there was a move that was blocked either by ALUC or Gary Griggs to prevent residential development in that area. Mr. Baker said staff is consistent in applying the Agricultural Element for residential development. He discussed the buffer for development. Commissioner Grierson said there is an issue with the height of the trees in the runway protection zones. He said an airport was shut down in Siskyou County due to a dispute between the Airport and the neighbors who refused to cut down the height on their trees. He said the whole Ranchaero area is trees and he admitted that he did not know how high almond trees get. He asked if this was something the Commission should be looking at down the road -as an adjustment to the CLUP as far as height limits of trees. He said Parts 77 can handle, but Parts 77 is a federal action which is to be used for planning purposes for development. He said what the Commission needs at the local level is the ability to address the neighbor's inability to be a good neighbor. Commissioner Baldridge said the tree issue is on the north and south sides of the airport. He questioned who pays to cut the tops off the trees where they are on private land. He said on the south Airport Land Use � .. ': _ -a side is a large old oak tree that CalTrans is' concerned about. He wondered if the oak is considered an ` historical tree: He said there is also a tree issue on the east `side of the runway, the almond trees are. too tall and there needs to be about three rows of trees iiemoved. He noted that'there are some Sycamore's on the north side by the creek that are on private land -and asked who pays to cut the trees , y • down. rCommissioner Hennigan said that at one time Butte County had an ordinance addressing this issue and the ordinance was lost. He said past staff was going to come up with a new ordinance regarding w "the height of trees and never did. - Mr. Baker said'he would research the matter of an ordinance. - Commissioner Grierson said the Ranchaero Airport is a unique situation because it is surrounded by trees and there is a non-standard, traffic pattern which is voluntary. He said Part 77 does,not care T about non-standard patterns. ' Chairman Wallrich said to put the County Ordinance and Pinkert project under proposed'CLUP amendments on the "Things to do" file. ` ;Commissioner Harp said he: did not like 'the outcome 'of the rule .to decide density and the ' Commission might want to discuss changing the rule. fiMr. -Baker discussed the measurement used to decide density. Commissioner Harp said the measurement was probably ok, but he wants to, look at it one more time. ';Chairman Wallrich asked that this item be e put on the list of possible changes to the CLUP. He also asked that the list be sent in the packet. Mr. Michelena said he will be looking at the CLUP's compatibility zones for new development. rHe asked if they wanted him to look at this as a typical traffic pattern that wouldbe required or allowed. t. s, Commissioner Grierson said when 'ALUC did the CLUP they discussed ,how to configure traffic patterns.' He said what. he believes was'adopted was that they would show two ways for handling north bound activity for the Airport, one with the left turn and the other is where they would literally go straight out: yet ." • •, ."" .' ,• �• .. Commissioner Hennigan said that'there was -a discussion where several people advocated that they should bow to the enviable and remove the restrictive zoning to the north of the runway, but the • ,• 'Commission concluded that it needs to be 'clear that .incompatible land uses already exist there and .• we need to influence the future. He • said if you remove the -restrictions then somefurther' development could take -place that.is i_ricompatible and we want to continue the zones that represent !x • the•aeronautical reality. Mr. Michelena discussed clustering. , He said the Ranchaero Airport has a C zone which gives you the _ option, of C-1 or C-2: zoning,, which allows you to do' a higher density of 5 acre lots. He discussed open space requirements. Commissioner Grierson explained that at the Chico Airport which is the only place where they will {' a , ■ Airport+Larid Use:Commission-■-M* inutes'of Meeting of January 2l; 2004 ger6 ■ find the C-1 and C-2, they identified'areas where the aircraft were"aflying at low- altitudes, high power settings, where controllability of the aircraft could be subject to, challenge if there is an engine.' malfunction, etc., and those correspond with certain sections of the traffic pattern: He said while they. are in a cruse flight as in a down runway they were, able to sustain a higher development level. Mr. Michelena said one of the biggest concerns is how to save open'space. Commissioner ,Grierson said the talks on open space in the past discussions have been ,for two +' purposes, one is a sound barrier and the other, is for an emergency crash. environment. - ' ' �BL�TT¢TOUNTXsAI ORT LAND USE CONI IISaSION ' ALuc. E ,C Indentification No. r 4 7 COUNTY:CENTER-DRIVE, OROVILLE,-.CA 959.65 { x;r<KAPPLICATION FOR CONSISTENCY FINDINGS PROJECTTROPONENT (TO BE'COMPLETED BY APPLICANT) Date of Application _1/6/04 Property Owner _Gary Grigg, Ranchaero«Airport " Phone • Number. '342-5242 Mailing Address: 2599 Oak Park Avenue Chico CA 95926 - Agent (if any) ti 7 Phone Number lo Mailing Address: ht PROJECTZOCATION `(TO_BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT) Attach an'accu"r`ately scaled map showing the relationship o the,project site;to'the airport boundary and runways Street • � . Address ' G UOS' CSA K PAP -IL _Ay E7 oe C H4 co 'Assessor's Parcel. No. 03 q ' SSD " ��5 Parcel Size a 3 • l '7 � L Subdivision Name: Zoning g' �^ r PROJECT -DESCRIPTION ( BE COMPLETED BYE APPLICANT •,fit ..'. s 'fi'. ' y If applicable; attachra detailed site plan,showing ground elevations, the location of structures;" open spaces, .,an water bodies, and the height o :structures and'trees; include additional project description data as'needed Existing Land Use F • _ (describe) 1 R ft rLT � Pal ,* Proposed Land Use (describe)- For describe) For Residential Uses: Number of Parcels or Units on Site (including secondary units) For Other Land Uses: Hours of Use: i y Maximum number of people on site: Indicate the method used to determine this number (i.e. Church membership, number of parking spaces; etc.) Height Data: Height above Ground of Tallest Object (including antennas & trees) ft. Highest Elevation (above sea level) of Any Object or Terrain on Site eft. - Flight Hazards: Does the project involve any characteristics which could create Electrical ' interference, confusing lights, glare, smoke, or other Electrical or visual hazards - „ to aircraft flight? a ❑ Yes, lPgo 4 Does the project have the potential for attracting birds? ❑ Yes XNo -If yes to either, explain below: IF 1 ,y1r�•• ` , r REFERRING AGENCY*( ~COMPLETED°BY AGENCA_ AFF) Date Received ,.., Type of project: Agency Name El General Plan Amendment ❑. Zoning Amend,Variance,Rezone F - ` El Subdivision.'Approval Staff Contact [1, Use Permit + f� Public Facility Phone Number 0. Other. Agency's Project No. • .., •` � f . ,.' ' t'+ .. ' . ''t . '^jT 'IN'fir', - . Signature Dater M (Applicant or Agent) K:\Planning\ALUC\FORMS\APPFORM.WPD ^' _ .1,•6'41. r u eCounh April 1, 2004 Butte County Board of Supervisors: L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH A N D BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 Enclosed for your review is an action that was approved as presented on March 17, 2004, by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for the Ranchaero' Airport. This type of periodic review is required on all county airports, under the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) and the regulations governing this Commission by the State of California. It is purpose and desire of the ALUC that all public airports within Butte County remain viable to its citizens and the business community, which rely on these facilities for a variety of services. This review was completed by Mr. Mark Michelena, Associate Planner under the supervision of Mr. Joe Baker, Planning Manager for Butte County. The Commission found this review to be complete and very comprehensive as it relates to the Airport and the surrounding area. We thank both of these gentlemen for a job well done! As indicated, the Commission found that land uses approved within the Airport Compatibility Zones surrounding the Airport, between the adoption of the CLUP in December 2000 and the present are consistent with the provisions of said document. We appreciate the ongoing support and cooperation of the County of Butte and City of Chico departments that work closely with the Commission to assure that its responsibilities are completed in an accurate and timely manner. Chairman, Butte County Airport Land Use Commission Cc: Director Development Services Paul McIntosh, Administration ' •i 1. That the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission finds that the'land uses as approved and executed within the Airport Compatibility Zones surrounding the Ranchaero Airport between 2000 and 2003 are consistent with the Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. 2. Further find that the Ranchaero Airport has added two additional hangar spaces, by removing one hanger and replacing it with a larger hanger, and added an above ground fuel tank consistent with the Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. 3. Further find that Butte County and the City of Chico land use entitlements granted from 2000 to 2003, within the Ranchaero Compatibility Zones, have been consistent with the Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. r KAPIanning\ALUC\CLUP\2003-2004 update\Ranchaero 2003\Motion to approve Ranchaero.doc y To 4 } tri C' S . couftt� IAN D OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY "'`" °�•.:..,x.r.. PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 April 1, 2004 City of Chico, City Manager P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 To the City Manager and staff - Enclosed for your review is an action that was approved as presented on March 17, 2004, by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for the Ranchaero Airport. This type of periodic review is required on all county airports, under the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) and the regulations governing this Commission by the State of California. It is purpose and desire of the ALUC that all public airports within Butte County remain viable to its citizens and the business community, which rely on these facilities for a variety of services. This review was completed by Mr. Mark Michelena, Associate Planner under the supervision of Mr. Joe Baker, Planning Manager for Butte County. The Commission found this review to be complete and very comprehensive as it relates to the Airport and the surrounding area. We thank both of these gentlemen for a job well done! As indicated, the Commission found that land uses approved within the Airport Compatibility Zones surrounding the Airport, between the adoption of the CLUP in December 2000 and the present are consistent with the provisions of said document. We appreciate the ongoing support and cooperation of the County of Butte and City of Chico departments that work closely with the Commission to assure that its responsibilities are • completed in an accurate and timely manner. Sincerely, ' r :-'Donald R. Wallrich Chairman, Butte County Airport Land Use Commission CC. Director of Development Services Paul McIntosh, Administration 1. That the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission finds that the land uses as approved and executed within the Airport Compatibility Zones surrounding the Ranchaero Airport between 2000 and 2003 are consistent with the Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. 2. Further find that the Ranchaero Airport has added two additional hangar spaces, by removing one hanger and replacing it with a larger hanger, and added an above ground fuel tank consistent with the Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. 3. Further find that Butte County and the City of Chico land use entitlements granted from 2000 to 2003, within the Ranchaero Compatibility Zones, have been consistent with the Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.. KAPlanning\ALUC\CLUP\2003-2004 update\Ranchaero 2003\Motion to approve Ranchaero.doc Butte County Department. of Deve jopment Services r Planning Division M • ort ;Air r P Land Use Commission March 17, 2004 Meeting AGENDA ITEM — F.1 TO: Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: Mark Michelena, Associate Planner DATE: March 8, 2004 ' ITEM: Motion to Find the Land Uses Established In 2003 to Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan farBhe Ranh p lance With the . ' o Airport. e Background On February 18, 2004, the Commission instructed Staff to adopt the finding of consistency of the land uses created in 2003 return with language for a motion to Airport with the Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan CL surrounding the Ranchaero • ( �� ' Recommendation Staff recommends that the Butte t , _ County Airport Land Use Commfollowing: ission . , move to adopt the 1 • That the Butte Count Ai ' Y rPort Land Use Commission finds that the land uses as approved and executed within the Airport Compatibility Zones surro Ranchaero Airport between 2000 and 2003 are consistit unding the stent w Land'Use Compatibility Planh the Butte County Airport 2. Further find that the Ranchaero Airport has added two y - removing one hanger and replacing it with a larger hanger stand added an ional hanger spaces, by - fuel tank consistent with the Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibilit above ground 3. Further find that Butte County and the City of Chico land use Y Plan. 4 2000 to 2003, within the Ranchaero Compatibility Zones entitlements granted from Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility plan , have been consistent with the p KA"annin9\ALUC\CLUP\2003-2004 update%nchaero 2003\Motion to approve Ranchaero.doc AV Butte County Department of Development Services iAirport Land Use Commi ssion m Memo ` Page 1 of 1 . n c Y 0 �l i .� �� - 'r .t Butte County Tentative Parcel Maps 2000 Thru 2003 �. _ �,.� ,.Fs[��.'t{ii•.:.�.., ..': �?S" llliii PW��1'.JA11> law'" 1 IIS' ' �� `. '� �' 7�P � �� ' �� Y� f' I 'v ti' �� /j,Ov v® � \e'0 `,�\ `fir♦ �'�. �� :rl��o•" �k � �� ti F,.,' 111•! jjr�. � �'��. _, . d $•' � ♦ � r . i O. � ✓i o ��: •043-690-069 � . . ParcelsQ .NAf:. Approved •• • '• VX 1 t•j,• TPIVI 03 -20 -� f 004-490-020 ��, loop - 1 Z'i�•� Parcels , f��J,•/*1 - of �. Approved , 1�i illl fll lli i • �sii w:: ��: lig t ; - _ MMMMM MEW,IH .j��a� w. ■_�_ ;� rAWK�Aw Compatibility Zone D �1-tt' Affm �r�i—�/ 4 e�gggg r —may �■g� butte. County. Tentative ParcLl ,Map$ 2000' Thru:'20 13 1 ; u?' r � •,r 5 �, n,�' w t'f Sim. �yzc City of Chico Tentative Parcel Maps 2000 Thru 2003 BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 FAX (530) 538-7785 MEMORANDUM TO: ALUC Members and Interested Agencies & Entities FROM: Mark Michelena, Associate Planner, Development Services DATE: February 11, 2004 . SUBJECT: CLUP update, Ranchaero Airport The following is a summary of the review of the Ranchaero Airport consistency review conducted during the first quarter of 2004. 1. Land Use Review and Evaluation • The following. ,tasks were accomplished in the effort to evaluate land use compatibility with the Ranchaero Airport: A. Reviewed City and County building permits for new single family dwellings issued between January 2000 and December 2003. • B. Reviewed City and County parcel maps approved for the same period and were found consistent with the CLUP. 2. Issues Raised During Initial Review Presentation o • Open space use adjacent to the Ranchaero Airport and appropriate open space standards. • Incompatible land uses and infill sites. • Evaluate .additional alternatives that would facilitate increases in density in the appropriate Airport Influence Zones surrounding Ranchaero Airport. 3. Airport Land Uses • Ranchaero Airport land uses and plan are consistent with the CLUP. • Ranchaero Airport has added one new hanger and an above ground fuel tank. K:\P1anning\ALUC\CLUP\2003-2004 Update\Ranchaero Airport 2003\MEMO 18Feb04 mtg.FRM _ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission :l r -c ,�� ._ i'{Yr 3�1,��+. r`ci:t r!I ..:" � !.'tea af!y'�5��er�� .. �t-.'r4 �'4�, r4-., �:&F5:"•IAk 5('nF: r }[ - � 7' CIA N!pco r� �ly�e Z r3AGI[�yvt,P y L) r ri Rill „ `rK+ �k� ��•y t�t+Ya�� lei ,FBF-��"F� ref r��y�i '�' S ��us7SSV a ” tha t 41ir1 fs�l -� a yrs ��y 2h�il� i ti 3pI . 5� IN 1 l t�,'Sa .}� �•,�3f ..�j��t,�'iVnr u�dY'3";1+F - - - � - . O - .�'' va { ?O}�i��iuct r.;t � rJii4�.•J'�ii$ �.i'�t��.L{�y.: - �. - - t � :�F`;�;?� x'�� ,fir'• �`r••; � - -150 y44�-t It � • 'dl`��t, y��}I ��c+ �,�j k'4{"t�j�j•�a•l itis U 'F S ��3 re]--,•�Yb`.4t'��§�,�',.M: '1^ ria ' f t�V ;: � k . 3�3G:c�yt�,):>lis.,;` �.�,r...�1ipt��'i..-.s 'i'�Em•:l�set.if z � '� � tY l � � � '�� rj t a•`hr i � � [ a* r � �- w' • 4 t4° 1 � "'fir 1'<�T-�� 'xi{�{�•�) � - Y as n AV gg NIT c G � Z NA xv a py'�- ,.k ! ` ,y, '� C'T ' 4 !R � � L' hiY } ,,SR�"'� },✓f' ....,'I.C��,� ��. ' J J' Y � 1 ! ,i � � .. i �r .�Z1� ' 1 � G�S#�`,,Itzr,`+��. '• "'Y2 ,'� E 10 �± x� r c.t S 5� 1� t 9Sri yy t 4 JP < v i C. - co �Uyr i city �a� i�trl O C x. '3' phyx 1(Lj�t ' �!� `3J„� `s'"r i, �p Ij •z•'. � - � s t �v-�� f sr �L,4�1r'�T}��"'} air ggg •�+rPaY�•�� x-C:11q�lJ7; •�' � 1. '1 � ' "'- :UYA �1 �'F;� _ heti -�.' rn.-�1yi Pryl f. !•ire � s�� i r f � 1 � Z i ;, � i % s + �J -ta �y * _. i / �� e �„},Tr J 7. i SF_7^ �4n t' �ft •�"F e'l :��•-r� x � �,wv` �� =y ' r _ r�C.i . %'� 5. J 5 R` r•-'+ 'l t ( 5'�>!� --e ' -..� 6 E � i)yr r� f 5' �r r f1 '� :d'J�.+. �'det "�'T ��' ' f% _ It tv u t .J�i71eY s�7��u M,ad is ��N�� s ��rr�=y�pYrr��it�•'3`ns�iS� "t t §�, v��iT.��Yr � >s to : A.r �''- } r ar -Rr i l � � e4 n t •� �'` r s � �eY 't5"� 4 .F Y�i>.r: � �,�,y ^"'•• :•w i` . SY tiv�[„ r�. J .f�'; n 1 � Y �o-l_ + �y LL �� yv k�N }� . ..�3,..� Jar f, ^o- S Yr.• -v,r 'Yb`ri' y .�"ark 'es,7Y"° r 15J"p� -aw" tt t S 3 RF r lY 7` t aw a JF g;vj�+^'6c ��¢p, }�j•;ti�j�?y�,h1�rv.,� d. �'' a I �t� Jx �4f t'S��i.� ,f '� , E VAN 7d �d ��3� _ CZ O �v<.F i �:. � � 4• ` .r ; S�"~'�+ � 4r[ xu -cap p 'sal �r4,' �,��'i' _ Vi '�° 7w7 - k[ y h4�rxZ t - V fih'^” h JVD 9Y7'l]j ` V P ,�'$..;yr .0 • 1" :� 1,5it``iE «. - yr 4;' +1 � t �'r,. - 4 �� i"' �w-J7 sP �7�ir ! /-� • - C rnJ'�'t' m _ �l - 1. � v 4 rtt }f��ri•R- _� by J ) zz. N � s '�`Y yY v94C,�>�� • �1�16U�[ �(�rt .%y.,Y+P, >•a,.?arJ... .� z.� y b��yy77��.a � �. !4 s . � ,l1tGF ztii`,, `rt ,' ,'°""•'F b IkB,kyXrr,.^P-�r>�'4[�c +��S�HI' '}L C4{� „a + /••�+ ` r,. " `114 h 'l ��t.y t4, it'x6�*ri.n� R iV rye+: �T.791A Fv" -,.I;t 4 +y tr .vrk'Nr,?r'�k ..., f M1Q O� � �•" Js }',.e� K x �,� i �hut..��r y,2i 16�Ue;}� yy ' . ,u s � 4 1��5 'kX Yy �' Y' , y...>r.r! a'sa .<' .::`=`h9..v.:.:.� M",t5a,.%.. '' .�.1�..ub..4iT+.:i•-..3 ...I Y...�.<la. �..Yta/ - Y Zr. 511 w N-08'496: 2 0 I �101 N W� 0 0 Background Data: Chico Municipal Airport / Chapter 4 AIRPORT LOCATION AND NEARBY TOPOGRAPHY > Location Northwestern Butte County ► 5 miles north of central Chico > Topography • Situated at 238 -foot elevation on western edge of Sacramento Valley • Generally flat terrain in immediate vicinity, gently ris- ing toward east; Sierra foothills begin 5 miles east EXISTING AIRPORT AREA LAND USES 1 General Character • Airport situated on northern edge of expanding Chico urban area ► Increasing residential development north and west Industrial on east edge of airport; open land beyond > Runway Approaches ► North (Rwy 13L): Rural residential 1.0 to 1.5 mile north of runway; agricultural land beyond • South (Rwy 31 R): Chico urban area 1.0 mile south > Traffic Patterns ► West (Rwy 13R-31 L): Mostly undeveloped within 1.0 mile of runway; rural/suburban residential on edges • East (Rwy 13L-31 R): Undeveloped grazing lands PLANNED AIRPORT AREA LAND USES > County of Butte • Industrial uses planned adjacent to east and west sides of airport ► Extensive agricultural residential development (1-40 acre parcels) inside 2.0 miles east [General Plan] • Expansive suburban residential uses (1 -acre min. parcels planned inside 2.0 miles west; higher den- sity core area 1.0 mile west [North Chico Specific Plan] > City of Chico • Similar to county planning on west, but with residen- tial density up to 2.0 dwelling units per acre ► Industrial uses along east edge of airport with open space lands beyond ► Urban residential and office uses on remaining un- developed land beyond south airport boundary AIRPORT ENVIRONS LAND USE JURISDICTIONS > County of Butte ► Areas to the north, east, and west of airport in coun- ty jurisdiction > City of Chico ► Airport lies within northern extension of city limits ► Sphere of influence mostly follows city limits near airport, but entire environs with city's planning area STATUS OF COMMUNITY PLANS > Butte County General Plan ► Land Use element adopted 1979; Noise and Safety elements adopted 1977 • "Chico Area Land Use Plan" map updated Septem- ber 1991 > North Chico Specific Plan • Adopted by County Board of Supervisors, March 1995 ► Addresses 5.6 -square -mile area extending west • from Chico Municipal Airport to State Route 99 > City of Chico General Plan Adopted November 1994 ESTABLISHED COMPATIBILITY MEASURES > Butte County General Plan ► Circulation Element includes policy to "ensure that land uses in the vicinity of public airports are com- patible with respective airport land use plans" • Noise Element has policy to "discourage noise -sen- sitive activities near airports" > North Chico Specific Plan ► Avigation easements "required for all lands" in area ► New construction to incorporate noise attenuation ► "Enhanced disclosure measures" to be implement- ed alerting home buyers and renters to proximity of airport ► "Overflight zone" signs to be installed in area > City of Chico General Plan ► Policies include to "safeguard ... Airport and its envi- rons from intrusion by uses that could limit expan- sion of air services to meet future aviation needs" ► Also, city policy to "prevent development in the Air- port environs that will pose hazards to aviation..." ► FAR Part 150 Program to be adoptedfimplemented ► Airport Environs Overlay Zoning to be adopted con- sistent with an updated Airport Environs Plan ► Notice of aircraft overflight to be recorded as condi- tion for development or subdivision near airport ► Single-family residential normally acceptable up to 60 dB CNEL > Other Chico City Policies ► Airport height limit zoning adopted (needs updating) Source: Data Compiled by Shutt Moen Associates (January 2000) Exhibit 41 Airport Environs Information Chico Municipal Airport 4-10 0 Background Data: Oroville Municipal Airport / Chapter 5 AIRPORT LOCATION AND NEARBY TOPOGRAPHY > Location ► Southern Butte County 3 miles west of central Oroville - > Topography • Situated at 200± foot elevation in gently rolling hills along eastern edge of Sacramento Valley ► Rising terrain (elevations above 1,000 ft. MSL) 5± miles northeast ► Thermalito Afterbay (part of state water system) im- mediately southwest of airport _ EXISTING AIRPORT AREA LAND USES > General Character ► Sparsely populated except to northeast ► Golf course in western quadrant of airport > Runway Approaches • Northwest (Rwy 12): Open pasture; widespread resi- dential ► Northeast (Rwy 19): Mostly undeveloped, open pas- ture within 1 mi. of rwy end; suburban residential areas beyond • Southwest (Rwy 1): Thermalito Afterbay • Southeast (Rwy 30): Oroville Wildlife Refuge > Traffic Patterns • Edge of Thermalito residential areas along left downwind for Rwy 12 and left base for Rwy 19 • Minimal development elsewhere PLANNED AIRPORT AREA LAND USES > County of Butte • Additional low-density residential (up to 5 dwelling units per acre) planned in Thermalito community • Continued agricultural residential (5- or 10 -acre min- imum lot size) uses to west of airport • Other areas set aside for open space and/or recre- ational uses > City of Oroville • Additional light industrial development planned for south and west sides of airport property and on pri- vate lands to north and northeast • Medium -density residential indicated along north and east edges of north -side industrial area and ad- jacent to golf course west of airport ► Other planned uses same as county AIRPORT ENVIRONS LAND USE JURISDICTIONS > County of Butte ► Most of surrounding area in unincorporated county jurisdiction, except north and northeast of airport > City of Oroville ► Airport property and inner portion of northeast ap- proach within city limits ► City sphere of influence covers entire airport envi- rons; no near-term annexation planned > State of California • Dept. of Water Resources controls State Water Proj- ect facilities including Thermalito Forebay and Afterbay • Dept. of Fish and Game governs Oroville Wildlife Refuge STATUS OF COMMUNITY PLANS > Butte County General Plan ► Land Use element adopted 1979; Noise and Safety elements adopted 1977 > City of Oroville General Plan ► Adopted October 1995 • Establishes land use designations for lands within city sphere of influence, including airport vicinity ► Includes airport compatibility policies in Circulation Element ESTABLISHED COMPATIBILITY MEASURES > Butte County Butte General Plan ► Circulation Element includes policy to "ensure that land uses in the vicinity of public airports are com- patible with respective airport land use plans" ► Noise Element has policy to "discourage noise -sen- sitive activities near airports" ► No airport -related height limit zoning adopted > City of Oroville General Plan ► Limit residential densities to 6 units per gross acre within overflight zone as defined in 1985 ALUC plan ► Prohibit schools and other uses resulting in "large concentrations" of people in overflight zone (policy discusses, but does not set, criteria for "large con- centrations" of people ► Restrict development within 55 dB C14EL contour ► Require avigation easement dedication as condition for subdivision approval within overflight zone • No airport -related height limit zoning adopted Source: Data Compiled by Shutt Moen Associates (January 2000) Exhibit 5G Airport Environs Information Oroville Municipal Airport 5-8 0 Background Data: Paradise I Is OWN ME �P I U PAR-COMPAT Source: Shutt Moen Associates (January 2000) /Chapter 6 ' - LEGEND Aircraft Departure Accident Risk Intensity Contours O(Shown for Takeoffs to the South) �1 Aircraft Approach Accident Risk Intensity Contours t (Shown for Landings from the South) * See AppendiK C for discussion FT 3,000' 0 FEET 6,OOV N 1 ° = 3,009 Exhibit 6F Accident Risk Intensity Paradise Skypark Airport 6-7 Background Data: Paradise Skypark Airport / Chapter 6 AIRPORT LOCATION AND NEARBY TOPOGRAPHY > Location ► Central Butte County ► 3 miles south of central Paradise > Topography • Airport situated at 1,300 feet elevation on ridge above eastern edge of Sacramento Valley • Slightly higher terrain along ridge to north; lower elevations elsewhere ► Higher mountains 5± miles north and east EXISTING AIRPORT AREA LAND USES > General Character ► Scrub on steeply sloping ridges and valleys ► Sparsely populated except toward north > Runway Approaches ► North (Rwy 17): widely scattered dwellings along ridge ► South (Rwy 35): steep slope; grazing land below > Traffic Pattern ► Steep terrain; sparsely populated grazing land PLANNED AIRPORT AREA LAND USES > County of Butte • Forest residential zoning in all directions within a mile of airport ► Minimum parcel sizes vary from 5 acres northeast of airport to 20 acres northwest and 40 acres on south and east > Town of Paradise • Airport and adjacent area in city sphere of influence designated for open space/agricultural uses ► Nearest areas.in city limits planned for agricultural residential uses (minimum 1 -acre parcels) with light industrial development along Hwy 191 AIRPORT ENVIRONS LAND USE JURISDICTIONS > County of Butte ► Airport and immediate environs in unincorporated Butte County jurisdiction > Town of Paradise ► City limits under 1 mile north of airport ► Airport within city sphere of influence STATUS OF COMMUNITY PLANS > Butte County General Plan ► Land Use element adopted 1979; Noise and Safety elements adopted 1977 > Town of Paradise General Plai Adopted 1994, amended 1998 ESTABLISHED COMPATIBILITY MEASURES > County of Butte General Plan ► Circulation Element includes policy to "ensure that land uses in the vicinity of public airports are com- patible with respective airport land use plans" ► Also, private airstrips are to "be controlled to ensure that they are outside flight paths t and from existing airports and that they do not provide a hazard or annoyance to neighboring areas" ► Noise Element has policy to "discourage noise -sen- sitive activities near airports" ► No airport -related height limit zoning adopted > Town of Paradise General Plan ► Policies allow only low -intensity industrial and other uses compatible with "FAA regulations" and ALUC plan adjacent to airport ► Single-family residential and other noise -sensitive uses not permitted within 55 -dB Ld" contour (shown on land use constraints diagram); multi -family resi- dential permitted within 55 -dB Ld" contour subject to acoustical analysis ► ALUC plan for Skypark adopted by reference; all zoning, subdivision, and general plan amendments within airport influence area to be submitted to ALUC for review and approval (Safety Element) • No airport -related height limit zoning adopted Source: Data Compiled by Shutt Moen Associates (January 2000) Exhibit 6G Airport Environs Information Paradise Skypark Airport t Background Data: Ranchaero Airport / Chapter 7 AIRPORT LOCATION AND NEARBY TOPOGRAPHY > Location ► Northwest Butte County ► 2 miles west of central Chico > Topography ► Situated at 173 feet elevation near western edge of Sacramento Valley • Surrounding terrain is flat with no significantly higher elevations within nearly 10 miles EXISTING AIRPORT AREA LAND USES > General Character ► Orchards immediately around airport ► Residential neighborhoods of Chico within 0.2 mile north and northeast > Runway Approaches • North (Rwy 15): orchard 250 feet from runway end; residential subdivision 1,000 feet ► South (Rwy 33): orchard 250 feet from runway end; house 800 feet south > Traffic Pattern Orchards PLANNED AIRPORT AREA LAND USES > County of Butte ► Airport and lands west, south, and southeast lie out- side "greenline" established by County General Plan; "greenline" policy intended to protect agricultural uses beyond line and support urban development on Chico city side ► Lands outside "greenline" designated in General Plan as orchard and field crop land, consistent with existing uses; designation requires minimum 20 - acre parcels (5 acres with conditional use permit) ► Existing residential area inside "greenline" north and northeast of airport designated low density (up to 6 dwelling units per gross acre) > City of Chico ► Urban development area boundary on city General Plan Diagram map coincides with county "greenline" in airport vicinity • Area to north and northeast designated for very -low - and low-density residential (up to 7 dwelling units per gross acre) AIRPORT ENVIRONS LAND USE JURISDICTIONS. > County of Butte ► Airport and immediate environs in county jurisdiction > City of Chico ► 1999 city limits within 1.0 miles north and east ► Residential area north of airport in city sphere of influence ► Airport and all surrounding lands in city's planning area boundary STATUS OF COMMUNITY PLANS > Butte County General Plan. ► Land Use element adopted 1979; Noise and Safety elements adopted 1977 > City of Chico General Plan ► Adopted Novemberl994 ESTABLISHED COMPATIBILITY MEASURES > Butte County General Plan • Circulation Element includes policy to "ensure that land uses in the vicinity of public airports are com- patible with respective airport land use plans" ► Also, private airstrips are to "be controlled to ensure that they are outside flight paths to and from existing airports and that they do not provide a hazard or annoyance to neighboring areas" ► Noise Element has policy to "discourage noise -sen- sitive activities near airports" • No airport -related height limit zoning adopted > City of Chico General Plan • No specific policy reference to Ranchaero Airport • Single-family residential normally acceptable up to 60 dB CNEL > Other Chico City Policies ► Airport height limit zoning does not apply to Ranchaero Source: Data Compiled by Shutt Moen Associates (January 2000) Exhibit 7G Airport Environs Information Ranchaero Airport 7-8 • "DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: �i 04/" /A AP#55"- O JS APPLICANT: OWNER:__ �NCEf�� /NC REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSED REQUEST: (to be filled out by person taking in application) 7v -rVr-4t2po rq- AWO StiA,1U UNN,%r- 46VEIL41mamr A TffAag PhWjff- FINAL REQUEST: (to be filled out by project planner) SIZE: LOCATION: _A�E T I+c-- END or cAtL- pAs-r- A ULr-vuE 1(oOiN OPe PAjw r (19AAX3, GL�.LD SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT # 4— EXISTING ZONING: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ASSIGNED P .ANNER• MT.Tt M C M �• 1. 1 Is PLANNERS INITIALS COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST County Offices and Cities: Chief Administrative Officer X Develop. Services Director X Environmental Health X Assesor Sheriff _ BCAG X LAFCo _ Air Quality Mgmt. _ Biggs _ Gridley _ Oroville _ Paradise Information Systems Dept. —Animal Control X County Counsel Irrigation District: _ Butte Water —Biggs/W. Gridley Water _ OWID _ Paradise Irrigation Table Mountain Irrigation _ Thermalito Irrigation Domestic Water _ Butte Water District _California Water Service Co. _ OWID Thermalito Irrigation District Sewer _ Butte Water District _ Themalito Irrigation Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) _ L.O.A. PUD Fire Protection X California Department of Forestry _ EI Medio Fire Protection District Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Durham Area Recreation Paradise Recreation & Park Richvale Recreation & Parks Utilities _ PG&E North - Chico _ Chambers Cable TV PG&E South - Oroville Viacom Cable TV State Agencies _ CalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept. of Water Resources _ Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter) _ Dept of Parks and Rec. _ Central Reg. Water Quality Cont. _ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program _ Department of Conservation _ Off. of Mining Reclamation Dept.Social Services, Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies _ US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management Army Corps of Engineers _ National Marine Fisheries Sservice Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. Lime Saddle Dist _ Community Association _ Drainage _ Butte Env.l Council Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society _ _ Butte Co. Mining Committee _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. _ Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancy _Mosq. Abatement. Oroville/Butte Co X Public Works Director _ Building Manager _ ALUC _ Butte Co. Farm Bureau _ Chico Chico Airport Commission X Agricultural Commission _ Durham Irrigation _ Richvale Irrigation Other _ Del Oro Water Co. Other Sterling City Sewer Main Feather River Rec. & Park _ Pacific Bell _ Dept. of Fish and Game _ Highway Patrol Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations US Fish & Wildlife Service School Districts K:\Planning\Forms\DISTR.wr