Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
043-280-002
Butte County Deparanent of Development Services Administration - AR 7 County Center Drive Ciroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone ALUC Application ' File:A 03-01 APN:043;=280 002&' 043-280-013 Applicant: Donn.,_Marshaii Date:'April221., 2003 '605 Marshall Court Chlco`CA 9597-3 Deposit Date: December 26:,2002 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING Deposit $300.00 Receipt: '20933;: Check #3435 .:. N V 0 1 C E A 03.01 Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice, the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program. There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program, and are not reflected on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed, you will receive a FINAL INVOICE. following charges have been applied to the processing of your application: Professional Planner Clerical The costs exceeded the deposited or paid amount by: $ ,280.25= 146;5O! TOTAL $ . 426 75 $126.75. Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees; deposits; billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to amount equal to 25% of the original deposit, no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore a balai equal to the amount of the initial deposit, or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event the applicant d not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application, the application will be denied. Make checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address. Should you have any questions, please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Biller: GS AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE BY $ 126.75 May 5, 2003 K:\FISCAL ADMIN\BILLING LETTERS�A 03-01 Inv. Marshall 042103.xls R J. 5/15/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 10:36 AM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 1 Selection Criteria Applicant (hand sel Include: A 03-01 Nickname A 03-01 ( Marshall " Full Name Donn Marshall Address 605 Marshall Court Chico CA 95973 ' Phone 1 Phone 2 Phone 3 Phone 4 ` In Ref To AP #043-280-002 & 043-280-013 Fees Arrg. By billing value on each slip Expense Arrg. By billing value on each slip Tax Profile Exempt Last bill r. Last charge 4/21/2003 Last payment 5/12/2003 Amount $126.75 Date Employee Rate Hours Amount ' ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 1/7/2003 Craig S. 59.00 2.50 147.50 41902 P Processing REPORT 1/7/2003 Diana S. 34.00 1.00 34.00 42304 Mapping Labels 1/8/2003 Craig S. "59.00 2.00 118.00 41931 P Processing REPORT/APPLICATION 1/9/2003 Dolores Horn 45.00 1.25 56.25 42067 C Clerical 1/10/2003 Dolores Horn 45.00 0.50 22.50 42068 C Clerical 1/17/2003 Craig S. 59.00 0.25 14.75 ' 42128 203 Site visit ` 1/21/2003 Dolores Horn 45.00 0.50 22.50 42303 Clerical/Input r ey 5/15/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 10:36 AM Pre -bill Worksheet A 03-01:Donn Marshall (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 4/21/2003 Cheryl S. 45.00 0.25 11.25 42984 Administrative Billing/administrative tasks not related to actual processing of application TOTAL Billable Fees 8.25 Total of billable expense slips Calculation of Fees and Costs Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable time slips Total of Fees (Time Charges) Total of Costs (Expense Charges) Total new charges Accounts Receivables DatellD Type Description 1/9/2003 PAY Payment, Receipt 20933. Check No. 3435 2246 5/12/2003 PAY Payment 2382 Receipt #21161. Check No. 3512 Total Accounts Receivable New Balance Current Unapplied Total New Balance Page 2 Total Billable $426.75 $0.00 Amount Total $426.75 ($300.00) ($126.75) $426.75 ($426.75) $426.75 $0.00 $426.75 ($426.75) $0.00 Kim: I am requesting a Transfer of Funds on the following, as these amounts were deposited into the wrong Fund Accounts. On May 12, 2003, a "Planning Division" deposit was made: ATR#63607, Receipt #21160, in the amount of $60.50. This amount was deposited into the 0010 General Funds Account Fund Code 0010 Dept. Code 440001 Acct. Code 4210900 Cash Code 101001 This amount should be deposited into the D.O.T. ALUC PLANNING Account Fund Code 0010 Dept. Code 440001 Acct. Code 4617241 Cash Code 101001 On May 12, 2003, a "Planning Division" deposit was made: ATR#63607, Receipt #21161, in the amount of $126.75. ' This amount was deposited into the 0010 General Funds Account Fund Code 0010 Dept. Code 440001 Acct. Code 4210900 Cash Code 101001 This amount should be deposited into the D.O.T. ALUC PLANNING Account Fund Code 0010 Dept. Code 440001 Acct. Code 4617241 Cash Code 101001 Thank you, Diane Diane Lewellen dlewellena,buttecounty.net (530) 538-6869 4 • COUNTY OF BUTTE • cc: AUDITOR - CONTROLLER ACCOUNTING TRANSACTION JOURNAL 5/16/2003 TRANSACTION CODE: A-APPROP EXP. B-APPROP REV R -REVENUE X -EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT TITLE FUND # or BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJECT TASK NUMBER T/C AMOUNT DEBIT CREDIT Development Services Planning Applications Planning Applications Planning - ALUC App Fees 440001 440001 440001 4210900 4210900 4617241 GL GL GL 60.50 126.75 T 187.25 DESCRIPTION: TRF ATR's for Dev Srvcs To transfer ATR #63607 to proper revenue codes per e-mail from Diane Lewellen, Dated May 16, 2003.. A B GL 187.251 187.25 page 1 of 1 - 5/16/2003 Prepared by: J. DODGE APPROVED BY: Fi. 1800 fi i i t' RECEWED FROM •1 40- yyo od'6 i= COUNTY OF BURrTE AUD&TORRES CERITO CA g E A.D TREASURER'S € ECEIPT OROVIL�E, CA PLANNINO BAG 0 3M AT -R mo 63667 DATE fill PJ2003 FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH DESCR1PTIOIN TITLE CODE' CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: 542 RECEIPTS: 21451-21181 PL.At4N9N,G APPL FEES I QENL 0040 440MI 424289W 4040 1 PE21ecL Number Amount of Fee t #041-130-18;17,19 & 041-190-31,35 $700 M bdou UP 03-19 #048-230:032 Gydl& Mellboc chrAG2=02 $5150. `W3-2l3Q-Q0ZQ13 C filar& ,ali A03-01 $128.75 LAND DEVELOPMENT GEL . 0010' 44COU 4641700 1011.4 450.E Project Number Amount of Fee 1-43fD-18,17,99 & Q44-4�tQ-39,35 X450 f bddU RSP 03=49 F-WRO6,#MENTAL. HLTH GEWL 0010 54MM 4614901 1c90r&4 r . Pmjec$ Number Amount of Fee 0041-130-98.17,19 & 041 -49th -34,35 X485 M ballou UP 03-4g ...,.FZ -PLNG APPL. FES FIRE PROTECT 010 4917240 10101 43-03 Pwiect Rum6ea Amount of Fee. .#041-130-1$.4 7,19 & 041-190-35 ,35 $43 M bayou UP 03-19 MODINGE CLERKS F@L ING FE GENL. 0010 4TOO'uD1 4612319 101009 (M) Project Number Amount of Fee _-- M bailou UP 03.19 DOCL94EF TIC45PY SALES GEHL OO10 4=301 4711910 1010DI, 2.35 APPRWED € Y: /f 1)�N--C� TOTAL -4474-.W. RECEIVED BY: Bv,: / or�re6t�[�r aIden M6c o2 1 ) �.�� (ov TOTAL. A8780-0 F APPROVED BY. RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER By. � By: white=treasurer pink --auditor .5 2 �5 canary --depositor golden rode ri o2 • COUNTY OF BUTTE: AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROYILLE, CA ATR NO 63607 E RECEIVED FROM PLANNING EI,AG 0 328 DATE SH 2120 93 FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: 542 RECEIPTS: 21151-211161 E PLANNING APPL FETES t GE:NL 0010 440001 421 101001 Project Number Amount of Fee #049-430-18;17,99 & 041-190.31,35 $700 M ballon UP 03-19 #048-230-032 Gyri!& Method chr A02-02 $60.50 #043-280.002;013 D Marshall A03-01 , $.126.75 I LAND DEVELOPMENT GE:NL 0010 440W4 4611700 101001 150.E Project Number Amount of Fee #049-93(1-18;17,99 & 044-990-31,35 $950 K ballou UP 03-19 i--WRONMENTAL HLTH GE NL 0010 54MM' 4614901 101001 185.00 Project Number Amount of Fee #041-130-98,17,99 & (3417i90-31,35 $985 ' M ballou UP 03-49 . ...... FIR&PLNG APPL FETE: FIRE PROTECT 0100 4617240 1101001 43.0 ' Project Number Amount of Fee #041-930-9$,47,19 8041-490-31,35 $43 M ballou UP 03-19 NODINOE CLERKS FILING FE GE:NL 0010 4700x01 4612518 10101 36.00 ($M) Project Number Amount of Fee . #041=130=iti,R7;1i3-&il41=190=31,33 X39 M ballou UP 03-19 . DOCUME:NTICOPY SALES GE:NL 0010 440M1 4711610 101001 2.35 1 ) �.�� (ov TOTAL. A8780-0 F APPROVED BY. RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER By. � By: white=treasurer pink --auditor .5 2 �5 canary --depositor golden rode ri o2 J `9 ,n -d r% 1�0ON 333 Ca � ,► , O 0 t'`o _ - i n i � V m s V , _ r6— � t' y a O� e �tl I.o 1 f 4 � a 1 NN i j t7C� i In kn Q 1. 0 0 a o ou o _ _ RECEIPT .; 21161 OFFICIAL RECEIPT +� .COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE.OF CALIFORNIA 1 -r OFFICE OF PLANNING - ISSUED BY `r, 6-�/1� _ ..-Uvv --94'a Y:S' 14-Q II - RECEIPT NOTAL PUBLIC _ -(PLANNING +' PUBLIC ;." t ENV.�'I" .. }FIRE ,' ' NOE/NOD` ''-07HEa f" tt�.K -APPLICANT DATE NO. RECEIVED. WORKS LAFCO SALES ' HEAITH F/G FEE - RECEIVED FROM RECEIPT .; 21161 OFFICIAL RECEIPT +� .COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE.OF CALIFORNIA 1 -r OFFICE OF PLANNING - ISSUED BY r 0- k'N C , i RECEIPT 21161 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE IF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING i ' ISSUED BY JLA W ~ -75 RECEIPT 21161 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE IF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING i ' ISSUED BY JLA W ~ -75 04-3 DATE RECEIPT NO. TOTAL RECEIVED PUBLIC WORKS LAFCO PLANNING PUBLIC SALES ENV.' ' HEALTH FIRE NOEMOD F/G FEE OTHER APPLICANT ,I RECEIVED FROM RECEIPT 21161 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE IF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING i ' ISSUED BY JLA W ~ I Applicant: Deposit Date: Receipt: ALl7C Application .. `r� File. -;Alb © Q 6, AQ. 1J C.0 mm oi\.1Stjr1 APN 1043-2so-o02 if s' r T4-3-56-613 y f -•fl ` Butte County Department ofDeveloprnent Services Donn MarshalF �; Administration AR y " �uT - 7 County Center Drive , . ..._" o 00., t Oroville, CA y95965 �;` '' ° o tY (530) 538.7601 Telephone #. ` o T o :December 26.''2002 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING Deposit •, _ Applicant: Deposit Date: Receipt: ALl7C Application .. `r� File. -;Alb © Q 6, AQ. 1J C.0 mm oi\.1Stjr1 APN 1043-2so-o02 if s' r T4-3-56-613 y f -•fl ` J Donn MarshalF �; Dr,r� ate Apnl21: 2003 y , �.�� � i '- Chlco,CA 95973 ''� � • ',� :December 26.''2002 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING Deposit •, _ $300.00' 20933. Check #3435' INVOICE A03.01 Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice, the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program. There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program, and are not reflected o this Invoice. Charges entered after this invoice.date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time ell charges are entered and billed; you will receive a FINAL INVOICE. The following charges have been applied to the processing of your application: Professional Planner $ * 280 25 Clerical 1'46 50 ,s TOTAL ., 426 75 The costs exceeded the deposited or paid amount by: �•, ,:. .' $126.75;'. Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees; deposits; billing procedures. County code requires:when the initlal deposited funds'are depleted to a amount equal to 25% of the original deposit, no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits.sufflcientfunds to restore a balan equal to the amount of the initial deposit, or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services.' In the event the applicant doe not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application, the application will be denied. Make checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address: • . ` Should you have any questions, please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE BY. $ -126.75 May 5, 2003 aL K:IFISCAL Aww%s1LLING LETTERSW 03-07 Inv:Marshall 04210.3.xis . t . A i Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services Administration - AR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone ALUC Application Applicant: Donn Marshall 605 Marshall Court Chico, CA 95973. Deposit Date: December 26, 2002 Receipt: 20933. 'Check #3435 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING Deposit File: A 03-01 APN: 043-280-002 & 043-280-013 Date: April 21, 2003 $300.00 INVOICE A03.01 Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice, the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program. There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program, and are not reflected on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed, you will receive a FINAL INVOICE. The following charges have been applied to the processing of your application: Professional Planner $' 280.25 Clerical 14&50' TOTAL $ 426.75 costs exceeded the deposited or paid amount by: $126.75 Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees; deposits; billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to an amount equal to 25% of the original deposit, no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore a balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit, or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event the applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application, the application will be denied. Make checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address. Should you have any questions, please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. AMOUNT DUE'AND PAYABLE BY . $ 126.75 Biller: cs ---]May 5.2003 K:\FISCAL ADMINOLLING LETTERSW 03-01 Inv. Marshall 042103.xls Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services Administration - AR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538.7601 Telephone ;ALUC: Application : Applicant: :Donn:Marshall .605: Marshall Court Chico, -CA 95973 0 Deposit Date: December 26. 2002 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING Deposit Receipt: 20933: Check.#3436.: File: A 03=0.1 ' APN::043=280-002 & 043-280-013 Date: fApril2l;;2003 .: $300.00 INVOICE A03.01 1 Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice, the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program. There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program, and are not reflected on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed, you will receive a FINAL INVOICE. following charges have been applied to the processing of your application: Professional Planner $ 28U5. Clerical1'46:50' TOTAL $. 426.75' costs exceeded the deposited or paid amount by: $126:75 tte County Code 3.44 Hourly fees; deposits; billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to an count equal to 25% of the original deposit, no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore a balance ual to the amount of the initial deposit, or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event the applicant does, t provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application, the application will be denied. ike checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address. ould you have any questions, please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE BY $ 126.75 May 5, 2003 K:\FISCAL ADMINOLLING LETTERSW 03-01 Inv. Marshall 042103.xis 4/21/2003 Butte County Department of Development` Senbces 1:20 PM - Pre -bill Worksheets `-_ . '� f ' Page 1 i Selection Criteria. ' Applicant (hand sel Include: A 03-01 Nickname A 03-01 Marshall Full Name Donn Marshall_ ' Address 605 Marshall Court t Chico CA 95973 f� - Phone 1 ' Phone 2 Phone 3 I Phone 4 In Ref To AP'#043-280-002 & 043-280-013 Fees Arrg. By billing value on each slip 7 Z �S Expense Arrg. By billing value on each slip . Tax Profile Exempt Last bill Last charge 4/21/2003 Last payment " 1/9/2003° Amount , $300.00 "Date. Employee Rate Hours Amount Total " ID f, Task } Markup %' DNB Time DNB Amt,._, •1/7/2003 Craig S. 59.00' 2.50 L 47.50 Billable = •i 41902 P ' . Processing i i REPORT 1/7/2003 Diana S 34.00 1.00 34 00�`' Billable A 42304 Mapping j " Labels ` ,; f ,x,• 1/8/2003 Craig S.� 59.00 2.00 {'1'18"00J Billable 41931 P 1...-� �. Processing r Y ' REPORT/APPLICATION 1/9/2003 Dolores Horri 45.00 1.25 ' 56:25 ,Billable 42067 C" Clerical 1/10/2003 Dolores !Horn ` 45.00. 0.50 22 50_ Billable t 42068 C Clerical 1/17/2003 Craig S. _ + ;, , •,, _59.00 ,0.25 14.75 Billable 42128 203 Site visit } 1/21/2003 Dolores Horn 45.00 0.50 22.50 Billable , 42303 Clerical/Input - 41 • .�j \t }j •yam 4/21/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 1:20 PM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 2 A 03-01:Donn Marshall (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB -Amt 4/21/2003 Cheryl S. 45.00 0.25 X11.25 Billable 42984 Administrative Billing/administrative tasks not related to actual processing of application TOTAL Billable Fees 825 %42675 Total of billable expense slips Calculation of Fees and Costs Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable time slips Total of Fees (Time Charges) Total of Costs (Expense Charges) Total new charges Accounts Receivables DatellD Type Description 1/9/2003 PAY Payment, Receipt 20933. Check No. 3435 2246 Total Accounts Receivable New Balance Current Unapplied Total New Balance $0.00 Amount Total $426.75 $426.75 $0.00 $426.75 ($300.00) ($300.00) $426.75 ($300.00) $126.75 4A, January 21, 2003 .Donn Marshall 605 Marshall Court Chico, CA 95973 uto t Count LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-6571 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net/dds/ RE: Application, File No. A03-01 — Orchard Commons APN# 043-280-002 and 043-280-013 Dear Mr. Marshall: At its Friday, January 17, 2003 meeting, the Airport Land Use Commission made the motion to find the referenced project consistent with the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan as documented in -the enclosed staff report. Should you need additional information, please contact me at (530) 538-7604. Sincerely, Dolores Horn Secretary I dh K:\Planning\ALUC\ALUC Applic Billing Letters\Sent Letters - 2003\A03-01 Orchard Commons Consistency W.doc Enc. cc: Patrick Murphy, City of Chico 1 .. + h Alit) ALUC Balance Sheet - Year 2003 - Page 1 P=Pa ment b ApplicanVR=Refund to Applicant Receipt/ Begin. Check Balance No..' Amount . Paym't/ Billed. Refund Balance ALUC• File APN No. Applicant/Agents 1:<.....::�.�..::.:.......::::::.�:::::::::::::::::.:•:::.,,:::. 20933 , : �.: A03-01 - 043 280 002 - and 043 280 013 ORCHARD COMMONS 4 r 1$ :::::.:k,,k:::::• $ 3435 300.00 >< '``..'` "' ' 300.00 "'�"�"""` Owner: Donn Marshall" $0.00 605 Marshall Ct., $0.00 Chico, 95973 Ph. 893-3090 $0.00 Contact: Patrick Mur by $0.00 City of Chico $0.00 P.O. Box 3420, Chico, 959: $0.00 Total Due Ph. 895-4983 ........... - $0.00 $0.00 .$0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Due ................................ .............. :,: ...: .0.00 -03 0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 '0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 ...:..,:...., .. w....:.., ................. . :. A03-04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 .................:: A03-05 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ' A03-06. 1 i $0.00 :$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.001 TOTAL $ 460.00 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER By. By: F:• white=treasurer pink --auditor. canary --depositor golden ros=file { COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROViLLE, CA ATR NO 6020. RECEIVED FROM PLANNING, BAG # 330 DATE 11912003 FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: 1-9 RECEIPTS: 2 v PLANNING APDL FEES GENL . 0010 44001 421Q= 101091 150-00 D.O.T.-ALUC PLANNING. GENL. 0010 440001 4697241 101101 300.00 Project Number Amount of Fee #043-280-002,013 D Marshall A 03-01 $300 TOTAL $ 460.00 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER By. By: F:• white=treasurer pink --auditor. canary --depositor golden ros=file { N 4.r• �`y� r Ys.E� { , � U� s January 9,2003 Mr. Donn Marshall 605 Marshall Court Chico, CA 95973 �:. ffutte Count RE: ALUC Application, File No. A03-01 APN 043-280-002 and 043-280-013 Dear Mr. Marshall: L A N D O F N AT U RA L W EA L T H A N D BEAUTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE ^ OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-6571 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net/dds/ The application for Parcel numbers referenced above has been received. Enclosed is a copy of Receipt No. 20933 and check #3435 totaling $300.00. Enclosed please find your copy of the Agenda for the upcoming Butte County Airport Land. Use Commission (ALUC) Meeting scheduled for January 9, 2003. This meeting will take place at 9:00 a.m. in the Supervisors' Chambers located at 25 County Center Drive, Oroville. Also, enclosed is your copy of the staff report ALUC File No. A03-01, APNs 043-280-002 and 043- 280-013 to be discussed at this meeting under Agenda Item F. 2. If you have additional questions, please contact me at (530) 538-7604. Sincerely, Dolores Horn Secretary I W Enclosure cc: Mr. Patrick Murphy, City of Chico � - '. t RECEIPT 20933 ' o.• :OFFICIAL RECEIPT 'COUNTY, OF BUTTE ` STATE OF CALIFORNIA ' OFFICE OF PLANNING ISS BY ^ _ ` _ 4' - - •. y i, _ � ', , �t Sr.t F . _ . A ,_ r4 - r. • T M� �i ��'���,r� +, — i s t '• A '+ _. �+ f � _ . .+r .' '� �-s...• „ � .t:�,- � s.ai:�=�..���J'i+.•,a...�;,.'.� +.:i. y.•.���.;yi ` �.�k�.•+'i: • � z�t:� s- ,;�-..,.yam* d'•+_ ' J i - '`+ •-_ Y ' `.�� .. . .. � -•-+. S !� � �.. _ RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC LAFCO PLANNING. PUBLIC ENV. - FIRE NOE/ F/G FEE FEE OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM t DATE NO. RECEIVED WORKS SALES HEALTH t RECEIPT 20933 ' o.• :OFFICIAL RECEIPT 'COUNTY, OF BUTTE ` STATE OF CALIFORNIA ' OFFICE OF PLANNING ISS BY ^ _ ` _ 4' - - •. y i, _ � ', , �t Sr.t F . _ . A ,_ r4 - r. • T M� �i ��'���,r� +, — i s t '• A '+ _. �+ f � _ . .+r .' '� �-s...• „ � .t:�,- � s.ai:�=�..���J'i+.•,a...�;,.'.� +.:i. y.•.���.;yi ` �.�k�.•+'i: • � z�t:� s- ,;�-..,.yam* d'•+_ ' J i - '`+ •-_ Y ' `.�� .. . .. � -•-+. S !� � �.. _ a _ y PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET* MiE th A03-01 r AT #: 043-280-002 and 043-280-013 APPLICANT: Donn Marshall, 605 Marshall Court, Chico, CA 95973 Ph. 893-3090 ADDRESS: OWNER: REPRESENTATIVE: ADDRESS. PROJECT DESCRIPTION / LOCATION: DESIGNATION: 20 Independence Drive, Chico, CA 95973 Same. Patrick Murphy, Senior Planner, City of Chico, Ph. (530)1895-4983. P.O. Box 3420, Chico, CA 95927 1320 and 1340 W. Sacramento Avenue, located on the north side of W. Sacramento Avenue between Gateway Lane and Victorian Park Drive. , I. A�cation submitted: 12/26/02 Amount: $300.00 Receipt # 20933 Photocopy of deposit check received 2. Comments (sent to / received from): 3. Staff/Report (date / prepared by): Staff Report in file ` 4. Published: (date / specify where) : ❑ Hearing Notice, if published 5. AJXC Commission Hearing(s): 1/17/03 Agenda Action taken: k Found to be Consistent Found to be Inconsistent Notes/Special Conditions: 03 6 l 6. Minutes CLOSED FILES: 0 Billed out date Received Check Amount: $ Receipt # 0 Sent them Refund or Check box if County-initiated—"Exempt from fees" d K:\Planning\ALUC\BILLINGS\PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET.doc BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION Minutes of January 17, 2003 A. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE B. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Wallrich; Vice Chair Harp; Commissioners Greenwood and Grierson (Commissioner Baldridge joined the meeting in session); Alternate Commissioners Hennigan, Papadakis, and Rothe. Absent: Commissioner Rosene; Alternate Commissioners Roberson and Sherwood. Others Present: Fred Gerst Barbara Hennigan Joe Baker, Principal Planner Craig Sanders, Senior Planner Dolores Horn, Secretary I C. APPOINTMENTS 1. WELCOME NEW COMMISSIONER Chair Wallrich welcomed former Alternate Commissioner Greenwood as Commissioner, appointed by the City Selection Committee for a term to expire the first meeting in May, 2003. D. APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT MINUTES FOR THE DECEMBER 18, 2002 MEETING Vice Chair Harp requested a correction on page ,5, line 9 to change "...include a definition, the criteria, and how the Cities and County would meet"the requirements." to "...include a definition and the criteria used to evaluate the open space requirements." It was moved by Vice Chair Harp, seconded by Commissioner Grierson, and unanimously carried to adopt the minutes of the December 18, 2002 as corrected. E. ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA A motion was made by Vice Chair Harp, seconded by Commissioner Grierson, and unanimously carried to accept the Agenda. F. BUSINESS ITEMS ITEMS WITH PUBLIC HEARING 1. ALUC File No. A02-12 Butte County Department of Development Services, APN 007-240-078: A consistency review for a proposed General Plan Amendment from Commercial to Public and a Rezone from C-2 (General Commercial) to PQ (Public/Quasi-Public) on 1.62 acres located at the northeast corner of Hicks Lane and Eaton Avenue, Chico. The property is proposed to be developed with a County Fire Station. Mr. Craig Sanders presented the staff report. He added that this request was to facilitate the relocation of Fire Station #42 currently located at Frontier Circle and Cohasset to the northeast corner of Hicks Lane and Eaton Avenue in Chico. Mr. Sanders concluded his comments by recommending that the Commission find the project consistent with the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan with no special conditions and based on the following findings: SECTION 1: ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS A. No environmental documentation was submitted at the time of project review. SECTION 2: CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT A. The proposal to amend the General Plan from Commercial to Public and a Rezone from C-2 (General Commercial) to PQ (Public/Quasi-Public) on 1.62 acres is compatible with the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport SECTION 3: PROJECT FINDINGS: A. The project site is located in Airport Compatibility Zone "C-2" as listed in the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for the Chico Municipal Airport. B. The resulting intensity of use will be approximately 3 people per acre which is consistent with the recommended allowable intensity of 100 people per acre for Compatibility Zone "C." SECTION 4: PROJECT CONDITIONS: 1. The proposed PQ zoning allows uses that would not be compatible with airport operations, specifically a children's school, library, or hospital. A method for preventing these . uses from being established in the future should be incorporated into approval for this project. ■ Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of Meeting of January 17, 2003 ■ Page 2 ■ a It was requested that on page 3 of Exhibit A that -the name "Agasy Inc." should be changed to "Butte County." Alternate Commissioner Dilley asked Mr. Sanders -about Exhibit A, Section 4, Project Condition Rezoning for clarification on the wording that stated, "The proposed PQ zoning allows uses that would not be compatible with airport operations, specifically a children's school, library, or hospital. A method for preventing these uses from being established in the future should be incorporated into approval for this project." He also asked what if anything would ALUC have to decide at this meeting regarding the method. Mr. Sanders replied that the normal method is that the Planning Department would do some type of conditional zoning stating the certain range of uses that would not be allowed should the fire department move away such as children schools, libraries, or hospitals. Mr. Sanders stated this project condition would move forward to the Planning Department and would be considered by the Planning Commission. Chair Wallrich opened the hearing to public comments. There being no comments, the hearing was closed. A motion was made by Vice Chair Harp, seconded by Alternate Commissioner Dilley and passed unanimously to find ALUC Application A02-012 (Butte County Department of Development Services) consistent with the 2000 Airport Land use Compatibility Plan based on the staff report as presented. 2. ALUC File No. A03-01 Marshall and Conrov — Orchard Commons TSM. APN 043-280-002 & 013: A consistency review'for a proposed Tentative Subdivision Map to divide a 5.88 acre parcel into 28 single family residential parcels. The property is located on the north side of West Sacramento Avenue approximately 1,950 feet west of Nord Avenue, Chico. Mr. Craig Sanders presented the staff report. He added that the project is located within incorporated limits of the City of Chico and the City is currently processing it. Mr. Sanders also stated that the site is located within the Airport Compatibility Zone "D" for the Ranchaero Airport. He also stated that Compatibility Zone "D" has no restrictions with respect to what density but prohibits land uses that represent hazards to flight, for example tall objects. Mr. Sanders added that single-family residential homes would not create any of these identified hazards to flight. Mr. Sanders concluded his comments by recommending that the Commission find the project consistent with the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan subject to the findings on Exhibit A, and based on the following findings: ■ Airport Land Use Commission 0 Minutes of Meeting of January 17, 2003 0 Page 3 ■ SECTION 1: ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS A. No environmental documentation was submitted at the time of project review. SECTION 2: CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT A. The proposed tentative Subdivision Map dividing a 5.88 acre parcel into 28 single family dwelling lots is consistent with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Ranchaero Airport and is consistent with airport operations SECTION 3: PROJECT FINDINGS: A. The project is in the "D" Airport Compatibility Zone as listed in the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for the Ranchaero Airport. B. The proposed project will allow for 28 single family dwellings to be constructed at a resulting average gross density of 4.76 lots per acre. This density is consistent with Primary Compatibility Criteria listed in Table 2A of the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the "D" Airport Compatibility Zone. Chair Walhich opened the hearing to public comments. There being no comments, the hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner ' Grieison, seconded by Commissioner Greenwood, and unanimously passed to approve ALUC Application A03-01 (Marshall and Conroy -Orchard Commons) consistent with the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan based on the staff report. ITEMS WITHOUT PUBLIC HEARING 3. Disclosure Document Mr. Sanders stated that he had determined that from the November 2001 meeting minutes ALUC unanimously adopted the Disclosure Document. Mr. Sanders provided a copy of this six-page document to the Commission members to review. Chair Wallrich stated that from the meeting minutes of December 2002 there were additional changes requested by Commissioner Rosene. He added that it was unclear on what this meant since it had been previously stated the document was adopted in 2001. w 0 Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of Meeting of January 17, 2003 ■ Page 4 ■ Commissioner Grierson and Barbara Hennigan recalled that the Disclosure Document was indeed adopted but Commissioner Rosene wished to rewrite the document to make the wording more user-friendly for the non -aviation person. Craig Sanders added that currently it is not being distributed to realtors and stated that now would be a good time to make updates. Mr. Sanders asked the Commission if the Disclosure Document and Deed Notice should continue to remain as two separate documents or do they now serve the same function. He also asked if the Disclosure Document should be recorded. The Commission briefly discussed this issue and concluded that the documents should remain as two separate documents. It was determined that the Disclosure Document does not require recordation but that the Deed Notice does. Chair Wallrich asked the Commission what action it would like to take on this item and reiterated the need to finalize it quickly so that it is ready for immediate distribution. Commissioner Greenwood requested that Table 2-A from the CLUP be included with the Disclosure Document. He added that it would be a good reference document for individuals to use versus researching the matter on their own. Commissioner Grierson requested that it be reflected in the meeting minutes that the modification and adoption of the Disclosure Document should not, in anyway, be construed as a change to the CLUP. Mr. Sanders stated that he would like to research the affect of the new state legislation with respect to the Disclosure Document. He added that he did not know if ALUC could compel individuals to use this document over a one -paragraph disclosure statement that the legislation requires. Bob Hennigan stated that it was ALUC's intent at the start of the process to provide the real estate community a document to help them meet the statutory requirement at that time instead of having to extract the information from the CLUP document on their own. He' added that ALUC could not require them to use the document but added that they have a legal obligation to disclose the information. Chair Wallrich summarized the discussion by stating that it would be necessary to check with Commissioner Rosene for his input on this matter. He added that Mr. Sanders would research the new legislation to ensure the Disclosure Document is in compliance and also add Table 2-A per Commissioner Greenwood's recommendation. Chair Wallrich also requested that this item be moved to the February ALUC meeting to have it formally approved and ready for immediate distribution. 0 Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of Meeting of January 17, 2003 0 Page 5 ■ 4. CLUP Document Amendments Chair Wallrich stated that there were no amendments for the year of 2002 but there would be an opportunity to do so in the year 2003. Mr. Sanders stated that he spoke with Kim Seidler, Planning Director from the City of Chico and he would welcome the opportunity to speak with ALUC at the February meeting regarding their General Plan. The Commission also discussed the Town of Paradise and the County. It was agreed that a letter should be sent to both agencies to request a Compatibility Update regarding the status of bringing their General Plan into compliance with the CLUP. Mr. Sanders concurred and stated that he would send a memo to the Town of Paradise and Butte County for an update on this matter: Mr. Sanders stated that the Town of Paradise had some issues to address with ALUC and how they would adopt a policy to take these issues into account. Mr. Sanders added that there are concerns regarding potential hazards to flight and ALUC would want to ensure they address these in either their zoning or General Plan. Chair Wallrich requested that Mr. Seidler from the City of Chico be placed on the agenda for the February meeting. 5. Discussion of Open Space Areas Around Chico and Oroville Airports Mr. Sanders stated that after the discussion of open space at the last meeting, he had prepared two additional maps for the Oroville and City of Chico airports. He also referred to a one-page report distributed to the Commission members on his findings. Mr. Sanders stated that he plotted all of the previously identified vacant land and land owned by the state, county, cities, and federal government. He also stated that he plotted additional properties around the Chico Airport that he had knowledge of as being open space designations or land planned to remain undeveloped. Mr. Sanders stated his results also showed that the open space requirements had been met within the public lands surrounding the Oroville Airport. He also added that the State has done an excellent job of buying up those lands and providing the required open space that is called for in the CLUP. Mr. Sanders also stated that the ten percent requirement in Zone C has more than been met. Mr. Sanders stated that much of land within the B1 Zone of the Chico Airport is currently owned by the City and does not necessarily mean it will remain open or that it is totally open now. He added that the acreage figure on his report might not be exact: 0 Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of Meeting of January 17, 2003 0 Page 6 ■ Mr. Sanders stated that C Zone has no significant public land; he added that there is only about 98 acres. He added that the ten percent open space requirement would have to be met and it could not be done solely on current public ownership. (There was a brief discussion from the audience regarding the how to best define open space.) Mr. Joe Baker responded that a definition of open space is very difficult. He added that from his previous work experience he had seen various definitions of open space. Mr. Baker stated that perhaps there is a need to define tighter classes of open space. Chair Wallrich stated that depending on whether or not ALUC reviews land uses or not, depending on when the .various governments' come into compliance, it could quickly be out of compliance. Mr. Sanders replied that he had a different view on this matter. He stated that as long as the County keeps the same land use designation/zoning they would meet that requirement. Mr. Sanders added that only when General Pan amendments or rezone requests come forward for review to ALUC would there be a potential problem. Mr. Sanders directed the Commission's attention to his handout from the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook (January 2002) explaining the characteristics of open land. The Commission briefly discussed the need to address the definition and purpose of open space. Chair Walhich suggested appointing a sub -committee to work on this issue. He requested that this remain an open item and agendized. for the February ALUC meeting. Chair Wallrich proposed that this committee might be comprised of interested members from the public and ALUC. Alternate Commissioner Dilley, responded that he would like to participate in this project. 6. Verizon Wireless Tower Chair Wallrich stated that a letter was received from Kim Seidler with a response to the tower lighting issue recommending ALUC bring this issue before the Chico City Council for reconsideration. Commissioner Baldridge stated that another letter had been drafted to the Chico City Council to place Verizon Wireless on their agenda for the next meeting to help work towards resolving this issue. ■ Airport Land Use Commission 0 Minutes of Meeting of January 17, 2003 ■ Page 7 ■ Commissioner Grierson requested that condition number three be deleted from the letter stating, "The amendment would apply to new towers or tower extensions within the Highway 99 Corridor only, and reviewable on a case by case basis." Commissioner Grierson expressed that the wording may be too limiting. Chair Wallrich requested that this issue of when lighting is required on towers remain on the agenda for the next meeting. Commissioner Grierson requested that Tony Baptiste, Community Development Director, from the City of Chico be added to the distribution list. Commissioner Grierson suggested that the word "emergency" should be removed from the subject line so that it would read, "Safety concerns for air operations." He added it would be less confusing to the non -aviation person. 7. Stevens Property Lawsuit Mr. Sanders stated that there is no additional information at this time. Chair Walhich requested that it remain as an open item. F. ' MONTHLY STATUS REPORT None. G. COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS Chair Wallrich stated that this item would be discussed further at next month's meeting. He discussed with the Commission on how to best recruit applicants to fill Nina Lambert's vacancy. Mr. Sanders stated that he could not find any information in the ALUC Bylaws that stipulated how the Commission would have to appoint its At -large Member. He added that it would be the Commission's decision on how fill this vacancy by advertising in the newspaper and allow for a 30 -day recruitment process. Chair Wallrich asked if ALUC had a requirement to advertise in the newspaper. Mr. Sanders responded that it not a requirement but added that there may be some interest in the general public for those that would like to serve. Chair Wallrich responded that there are two alternate ALUC commissioners interested in the position. ■ Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of Meeting of January 17, 2003 0 Page 8 ■ Commissioner Grierson replied that advertising would be a good idea in order to maintain a pool of viable candidates. Mr. Sanders responded that an ad would be placed in the newspapers as soon as possible. Mr. Sanders added that a decision could be made to fill Nina Lambert's vacant position at the March meeting since February would be too` soon. H. ALUC ADMINISTRATIVE LOG Mr: Sanders stated that a project named "Hayes" would be available for ALUC review at the February meeting. He added that this is one of the large projects left in the North Chico Specific Plan, and he is waiting for the ALUC application to be submitted next week. I. CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS Chair Walhich noted that the Deed Notice had been sent out for Agasy, Inc. and that this notification process is in place. . J. PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA None. K. OTHER BUSINESS Commissioner Grierson mentioned that Shutt Moen Associates, the vendor previously hired to work on the CLUP, had been acquired by the Mead & Hunt consulting firm. He added that the name would remain along with staff members and location. Commissioner Grierson added that he had received the Governor's proposed budget; it showed Caltrans' Division of Aeronautics with a 1.7 million -dollar reduction from this year. He added that this reduction will significantly affect their ability to give loans to small airports for construction projects and local management assistance; it would adversely affect them but they would remain in existence. Commissioner Grierson announced that he now reports to Craig Sanders. Mr. Sanders has accepted the position of City of Chico Airport Commissioner replacing Steve Lucas. L. CLOSED SESSION None. M. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, Chair Wallrich adjourned the meeting at 10:34 a.m. ■ Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of Meeting of January 17, 2003 0 Page 9 ■ Minutes prepared by Dolores Horn, Secretary I. ■ Airport Land Use Commission 0 Minutes of Meeting of January 17, 2003 ■ Page 10 ■ BUTTE CONY AIRPORT LAND COMMISSION ■ 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 ■ (530) 538-7604 FAX (530) 538-7785 ■ REGULAR MEETING OF THE COMMISSION Location: Butte County Administration Building, Supervisors' Chambers 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California Date/Time: Friday, January 17, 2003 — 9:00 a.m. AGENDA ALL ITEMS ARE OPEN FOR PUBLIC COMMENT A. Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call. C. D. E. F Appointments. 1. Welcome new Commissioner Approval of the draft minutes for the December 18, 2002 meeting. Acceptance of the Agenda (Commission members or staff may request additions, deletions, or changes in the Agenda order.) Business Items: ITEM WITH PUBLIC HEARING 1. ALUC File No. A02-12 Butte County Department of Develonment Services. APN 007-240- 078: A consistency review for a proposed General Plan Amendment from Commercial to Public and a Rezone from C-2 (General Commercial) to PQ (Public/Quasi-Public) on 1.62 acres located at the northeast corner of Hicks Lane and Eaton Avenue, Chico. The property is proposed to be developed with a County Fire Station. 2. ALUC File No. A03-01 Marshall and Conrov — Orchard Commons TSM. APN 043-280-002 & 013: A consistency review for a proposed Tentative Subdivision Map to divide a 5.88 acre parcel into 28 single family residential parcels. The property is located on the north side of West Sacramento Avenue approximately 1,950 feet west of Nord Avenue, Chico. • Airport Land Use Commission • Agenda • Page 1 "i ITEMS WITHOUT PUBLIC HEARING 3. Disclosure Document . 4. CLUP Document Amendments 5. Discussion of Open Space Areas Around Chico and Oroville Airports 6. Verizon Wireless Tower Lighting 7. Stevens Property Lawsuit G. Monthly Status Report. H. Committee Appointments. I. ALUC Administrative Log. J. Correspondence and Commission Announcements. K. Public Comment on Items Not Already on the Agenda — (Presentations will be limited to five minutes. The Airport Land Use Commission is prohibited by state law from taking action on any item presented if it is not listed on the agenda.) L. Other Business. M. Closed Session. N. Adjournment. Any disabled person needing special accommodation to participate in the Commission proceeding is requested to contact Dolores Horn, Secretary 1, at (530) 538-7604 prior to the meeting and arrangements will be made to accommodate you. *Copies of the agenda and documents relative to an agenda item may be obtained from the Clerk of the Commission at cost of 50.25 for the first page and $0.06 for each additional page. RULES APPLYING TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Members of the public wishing to address the Commission upon any subject within the jurisdiction of Butte AL UC may do so upon receiving recognition from the Chair at the appropriate time. 2. Comment on items not on the agenda should be made at the time indicated for "Public Comment" on the agenda. The Commission may not act on any matter so raised and will have to put off action until a meeting at which the matter can be put on the agenda. 3. Comment on specific agenda items may be made during the discussion of that agenda item, upon recognition by the Chair. 4. After receiving recognition, please approach the podium and state your name and address at the microphone before making your presentation, so that the Clerk may take down this information. 5. All documents to be presented to the Commission shall be given to the Clerk of the Commission (original and seven copies) prior to Call of Order of meeting. Such documents shall be distributed to the Commission and made available for public inspection. This Agenda was mailed to those requesting notice and posted 72 hours in advance of the meeting, at the following locations: Butte County Administration Building, front entrance and glass case. • Airport Land Use Commission • Agenda • Page 2 • T -,AGENDA ITEM - F.2. TO: Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: Craig Sanders ALUC Staff - DATE: January 8, 2002 ITEM: ALUC File No. A03-01 Marshall and Conrov — Orchard Commons TSM. APN 043-280-002 & 013: A consistency review for a proposed Tentative Subdivision Map to divide a 5.88 acre parcel into 28 single family residential parcels. The property is located on the north side of West Sacramento Avenue approximately 1,950 feet west of Nord Avenue, Chico. FOR: Airport Land Use Commission Meeting on January 17, 2003 SUMMARY: Staff recommends that ALUC find the project consistent with the 2000 Use Compatibility Plan for the Ranchaero Airport. BACKGROUND: The property is within the incorporated limits of the City of Chico. The current General Plan Land Use designation is Low Density Residential and the zoning is R-1 (Single Family Residential). The site is currently developed with a single family residence, barn, and a walnut orchard. Surrounding land uses include an apartment complex to the north, a single family residential subdivision to the. west, a single family residence to the east with a pending application for apartments and a single family residential subdivision to the south. ANALYSIS: The project involves dividing a 5.88 acre parcel into 28 single-family residential lots with a resulting gross density of 4.76 dwelling units per acre. Proposed lots will range between 4,548 square feet to 11,979 square feet. This project is being reviewed pursuant to section 1.5.2 (a) of the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) as a "major land use action" by a local agency that has not brought its General Plan into conformity with the ALUCP. ` According to the 2000 ALUCP for the subject property is located within the Area of Influence for i the Ranchaero Airport and is within Compatibility Zone "D". The site is approximately 3,200 feet r northeasterly of the north end of the Ranchaero Airport runway. Compatibility Zone D has no restrictions with respect to residential density and only precludes uses that represent "hazards to r i8utte County /Airport Land Use Commission i ' 1 flight" such.as tall objects, electronic forms of interference, etc. The development of the property with single family residences would not create any of these hazards to flight. Environmental Documentation: No' environmental documentation has been completed for this project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission find ALUC File No. A03-01 (Marshall and Conroy — Orchard Commons) would be consistent with the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Ranchaero Airport. Exhibits: A: Findings B: List of References C: Project Location illustrated on the Ranchaero Airport Compatibility Map D.Orchard Commons Tentative Subdivision Map KAALUC\MEETINGS\2003\03-01 \orchardreport.doc iButte County HAirport Land Use Commission i 7k _ 2 1 ., EXHIBIT A BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR: ALUC File No. A03-01: Marshall and Conrov APN 043-280-002 and 013 The Airport Land Use Commission has prepared the following findings based on data contained in the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for the Chico Municipal Airport, as well as site specific information submitted by the applicant and the ALUC staff. The following findings have been prepared at the direction of the ALUC and are for the consideration of the Lead Agency (City of Chico) when making a decision on the project. ; SECTION 1: ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS A. No environmental documentation was submitted at the time of project review. ' SECTION 2: CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT A. The proposed tentative Subdivision Map dividing a 5.88 acre parcel into 28 single family dwelling lots is consistent with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Ranchaero Airport and is consistent with airport operations SECTION 3: PROJECT FINDINGS: , A. The project is in the "D" Airport Compatibility Zone as listed in the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for the Ranchaero Airport. B. The proposed project will allow for 28 single family dwellings to be constructed at a resulting average gross density of 4.76 lots per acre. This density is consistent with Primary Compatibility Criteria listed in Table 2A of the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the "D" Airport Compatibility Zone. s 1 - i8utte County iAirport Land Use Commission s 3 EXHIBIT B List of References Data supporting the ALUC's findings have been generated from studies and reports prepared by recognized professionals and agencies with expertise in Airport Land Use Planning and land use compatibility. These include, but are not limited to: Butte County 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan R. Dixon Speak Associates - Prepared Butte County Airport Facilities Plan. Caltrans Division of Aeronautics -1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. Hodges and Shutt - Prepared accident scatter data presented in Chapter 8 of the 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Transportation Studies (1993) - Prepared accident scatter data presented in Figure 9E on page 9-13 of the 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. ,w { 6 y f i •" Y { s8utte County ArAirport Land Use Commission s �' 4 tY MAKE IRM AND SUE :.o,.•<< y IToEN�µOEARN BWOIOVED xTg Is3FRIRT TREE AND SUE ' 6 4. PPO.ECT SAWYOR JAPES HERRLCK LS 6616 — — — — — — tr 'w1 IL13 .,t 44 vo WAUA)T TREE AND SUE ss7 10.1 aa.s acwr" /4P2 `,•,. E]851MNC TREE TO BE RE1101EiED .o -R _ �- e UM .DGSUNIC STPDC TANK TO BE ABAND04M I � � x[10' ?pp'-• IR ' t i J �/. .ti it � • ® TM Y " O PROPOSED PUBLIC STREET, '1 � . .. y4- =T 10. }TOR11 DRAINAGE ON-SLiE aUANTIIY AND OUIWTY YITIGATIGN — SCALE . 1' = 50' .. ® — — 11. MANAGE REMOO'N TO BE Ad6EVFD ON --SITE +e 1 ,. . - t �F, ' 4 •~; _ — 'f - —1� — — LEGEND'S , 12.447 .¢R F"' aza .a.s sw -440 FA931EMT CK IMt6e 090 AM alfa -. ... , sK as -taw 15-02S WIL � j SA25 q R 4623 aa"•L aiS! «t+ . -) �' = r -" att AREAS �'°' RA V&) LANE SEC17Ml m - PROPOSED DROP NIST • 1 l ~ ' j - w- - ' �'a-"• r : ux 3NUMBER ' RANGrL OF RESIDENTIAL IDT AREAS - 4.548 SF to 12.447 SF Q NOT 10 SCALE r ' 57 .aw ASSESSORS PARCEL- NIAIBETt _ . '.,i,` o4 �r =' w . •' +'r^':.k W L�,IRCf.NCY SD OUTFALL TO CONNECT TO COUNTY ; •- " 7 - SAC STORY MANAGE EASEL EXT �,; �` T t "' a '�•.: ®�� pg� i �. - + �x:♦ 'M 4Z- ,. AS:E PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMEM.0 • , , 17 4205 e% ---- UNDTRCROUND ® a ETOSI°iG SS YANBIOF " , PROPOSED SO YANHOIE ' P 1. WATER QUANTITY MITIGATIOI NTN PRETREATMENT to ` ~ W , — — — —' — gQSTNG WALK FROM EAST AND MIST ® Z Q9' 1 LOTS 1-4 MILL HAVE AN ALLEY FOR DRIVEWAY ACCESS N DIE REAR 2 ,2'• _ PINE TREE AND SIZE _ a , • - 4 •.� OF THE PROPERTY MANTNNED BY COVDLAMM COND NDInONS AFESTRICTIGES (CCAW4} j'G• qq 1 v 27 . y < - B.S' 4.6' • t • . ts'Q tY OAK TREE AND SIZE r .. TREE AND SUE 042-062-04 u eS �, 16 '"' 4� a WR �! 1}yn�� I 4402 tgfL .If ., e ,. �� tY MAKE IRM AND SUE :.o,.•<< y IToEN�µOEARN BWOIOVED xTg Is3FRIRT TREE AND SUE ' 6 4. PPO.ECT SAWYOR JAPES HERRLCK LS 6616 — — — — — — tr 'w1 IL13 .,t 44 vo WAUA)T TREE AND SUE ss7 10.1 aa.s acwr" /4P2 `,•,. E]851MNC TREE TO BE RE1101EiED .o -R _ �- e UM .DGSUNIC STPDC TANK TO BE ABAND04M I � � x[10' ?pp'-• ata r O PROPOSED PUBLIC STREET, 0. CABLE TW AT&T CABLE DUMI REMAIN 1 OF THE JOHN BIDWELL RANCHO' 10. }TOR11 DRAINAGE ON-SLiE aUANTIIY AND OUIWTY YITIGATIGN — D PROPOSED SMW WATER RETDNTWN FACIM. LOT A ® — — 11. MANAGE REMOO'N TO BE Ad6EVFD ON --SITE +e 1 i I CITY OF CHICO j \\\\ ABUTTER'S RIGHTS TO BE RFIIINOUISEIFD 1 I , 4,964 ; I 15-02S WIL � j SA25 q R 4623 aa"•L aiS! 13 OEVOOPElt YARSHAl1/CONROY 1161 E 9th ST CNOOa CA ti59T8 att AREAS 14. DOSRNO WRIS AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS TO 6E ABANDONED 'r b VIA PERMIT FROM BUTTE COUNTY ERVYtONMFNTAL NEALTN j 16. APN 043-250-002 t 013 TOTAL AREA;- 5.88 ACS OF PROPOSED LOTS - 28 RESIDENTIAL �'a-"• 10. GRADING: ALL LOTS MRL BE GRADED TO DRAW TOWARDS THE 3NUMBER ' RANGrL OF RESIDENTIAL IDT AREAS - 4.548 SF to 12.447 SF Q r,, 57 .aw AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOT SITE 8,267 SF +/- W L�,IRCf.NCY SD OUTFALL TO CONNECT TO COUNTY , j • PROPOSED DETV5ITY -4.78 LATS/ACRE - WEST SACRAMENTO W R.Br s DE�/CN CR/7ER/A MOD/FICA AGNS .% aqeL ---- UNDTRCROUND — - Q 0.13 ' 1. WATER QUANTITY MITIGATIOI NTN PRETREATMENT 2. HEST SACRAMENTO AVENUE - REQUEST CONTIGUOUS SIDEWAIK 70 MATCH gQSTNG WALK FROM EAST AND MIST ® Z Q9' 1 LOTS 1-4 MILL HAVE AN ALLEY FOR DRIVEWAY ACCESS N DIE REAR 2 Q 11 A-4 OF THE PROPERTY MANTNNED BY COVDLAMM COND NDInONS AFESTRICTIGES (CCAW4} p < NOTES ------ N _.e Aw . its 8,°14 ' 414 1. ZCAONG R-1 2. GENERAL PLANE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - Ot2-962-057 I& 19 11, 20 A �aR 1 4.548 .qR• x ovu I a1o.�.y surra man m t4iarAl4m.. 4at0 m LOCA AON MAP WEST SACRAMENTO SECAON' NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCA, 30.0, nct alo' a \ e� _► :e I C 1tr1CY/ m 4DOWa � 21 j 22 $+j a66D pR 23 ; I Y' ats CA YMAN COURT SECA'ON , t tt,aas p.R I u,-4' 1 `rte j ata .ar.. • S LAND USE: O VACW12 SINGLE N%W1ORg1ARD :.o,.•<< y IToEN�µOEARN BWOIOVED 26 i Tt(orm&- ' 6 4. PPO.ECT SAWYOR JAPES HERRLCK LS 6616 — — — — — — tr 'w1 IL13 .,t 44 And Planned Development " ss7 10.1 aa.s acwr" /4P2 `,•,. .o -R _ �- - j 0.13 .a.. ad I � � x[10' ?pp'-• ata r 24 0. CABLE TW AT&T CABLE DUMI REMAIN 1 OF THE JOHN BIDWELL RANCHO' 10. }TOR11 DRAINAGE ON-SLiE aUANTIIY AND OUIWTY YITIGATIGN — — — — --j 02-670 0.'13 er — — 11. MANAGE REMOO'N TO BE Ad6EVFD ON --SITE SN. T00T-OO60Q45 i I CITY OF CHICO j I& 19 11, 20 A �aR 1 4.548 .qR• x ovu I a1o.�.y surra man m t4iarAl4m.. 4at0 m LOCA AON MAP WEST SACRAMENTO SECAON' NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCA, 30.0, nct alo' a \ e� _► :e I C 1tr1CY/ m 4DOWa � 21 j 22 $+j a66D pR 23 ; I Y' ats CA YMAN COURT SECA'ON , t tt,aas p.R I u,-4' 1 `rte j ata .ar.. • S LAND USE: O VACW12 SINGLE N%W1ORg1ARD :.o,.•<< y IToEN�µOEARN BWOIOVED PROPOSED - RESIDELIlIAL% Tt(orm&- ' 6 4. PPO.ECT SAWYOR JAPES HERRLCK LS 6616 — — — — — — tr 'w1 0. SEWAGE- 07Y OF CIYCO (SS APPLICATION /1864 And Planned Development " ss7 10.1 aa.s acwr" 0. WATETC CNgOLttOA WATER sERA1cE `,•,. `� _ �- - j �'� Z P.G.h E .. 042-G62 I � � x[10' ?pp'-• a TP.E7'HOIIE: PACIFIC BDL � ; 1 tQ W>o� ar mrrf ' rrr a+m;s c Ka.o A, w w LOU s-.io.uw ra a 0. CABLE TW AT&T CABLE DUMI REMAIN 1 OF THE JOHN BIDWELL RANCHO' 10. }TOR11 DRAINAGE ON-SLiE aUANTIIY AND OUIWTY YITIGATIGN — — — — --j 02-670 — — 11. MANAGE REMOO'N TO BE Ad6EVFD ON --SITE SN. T00T-OO60Q45 i I CITY OF CHICO j AS APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUMIG WONG 12. OMIHER: MMSHM41C OM M 1161 E 9th ST: GOOQ, CA 65926 1 I '°'2 ; 3 ( at i. FOR ; I 15-02S WIL � j SA25 q R 4623 aa"•L aiS! 13 OEVOOPElt YARSHAl1/CONROY 1161 E 9th ST CNOOa CA ti59T8 oorgp 10613 1913 00.. ; I 14. DOSRNO WRIS AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS TO 6E ABANDONED ,e VIA PERMIT FROM BUTTE COUNTY ERVYtONMFNTAL NEALTN j 16. APN 043-250-002 t 013 10. GRADING: ALL LOTS MRL BE GRADED TO DRAW TOWARDS THE 61TERIOR STREETS SEE LOT 10. (TVP.) --- _ - - -- _ 17. STANDARD EROSION CONTROL YEASIRFS (°YP'.) M01 BE USED N COMPLIANCE • L�,IRCf.NCY SD OUTFALL TO CONNECT TO COUNTY NTN THE CITY OF O4CO AND THE WATER QUALITY CONW40L BOARD . �•------ WEST SACRAMENTO NOT TO SCALE 1�" PRINT ,,,,; V " I DEC 20 02 Tt(orm&- g til' Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map And Planned Development " ' S 02-14 do PD 02-09 . `,•,. `� i I ORCHARD COMMONS - .6575 aR .I j '° °°" I BEING A PORTION OF M I • LOT 54 OF THE `SECOND SUBDIVISION 1 OF THE JOHN BIDWELL RANCHO' SHOWN IN BOOK 5 OF MAPS. „ I AT PAGE 27 i I CITY OF CHICO j 4 I BUTTE COUNTY CAU at i. FOR MARSHALL AND CON 0t C2O.1�A O ' n& NOrthS W CIVIL • PLANKM 20 DIIARADON DRIVE • CKM C900"A 893-1600 Fu (s70) 893-7113 cG14CCI AVENUE - AP -N- 043-nO-002 A4 013 'JULY 2002 Joe Na 7487 CITYorCHICO 11 C.1872 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING 411 Main Street P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 (530) 895=4851 FAX (530) 895-4726 ATSS 459-4851 December 20, 2002 Attn: Development Services Director Butte County Planning Division VIA COURIER RE: ' Orchard Commons Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 02-14 & Planned Development Permit 02-09 (Marshall/Coriroy), located on the north side of W. Sacramento Avenue. Subdivision Account No.: 863-000/71477-4710 Enclosed is a vesting tentative subdivision map of the above -referenced subdivision, as well as a project description. Please review this map and forward to the City of Chico your recommendations regarding facilities, easements, permit requirements, comments and/or recommendations under your organization's jurisdiction. Please return your comments and/or one (1) annotated copy of the vesting tentative map within fifteen (15) days to: City of Chico Community Development Department; Planning Division Patrick Murphy P. O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927-3420 Response to this map application will allow the City to incorporate your recommendations into the final environmental analysis, conditions of approval for the tentative map, final map and/or improvement plans for the subdivision. Please include your name, agency and telephone number with all responses. If you have any general questions related to the project or process or wish to discuss the map in further detail, please call me at (530) 8954752, at your convenience. If you have specific questions related to engineering, please contact Development Engineering at (530) 8954983. Sincerely, Patrick Murphy Senior Planner cc: CDD ADPW McKinley Subdivision File (original letter) Enclosure(s) T/F (2 weeks) S:\Pmisubdivisions\S 02-14 (Orchard Commons)\Map Distrib. Ltr.wpd s it DEC 2 6 2002 SUITE COUNTY l PLAIMING DIVISION 03 &9 Made From Recycled Paper Staff Report S 02-14/PDP 02-09 Prepared By: Patrick Murphy, Senior Planner , CITYOFCHICo General Information INC. 1872 i Applicant: ' North Star Engineering, 20 Independence Drive, Chico, CA 95973 Property Owner.^ Marshall/Conroy, 1367 East Avenue, Chico CA 95926 Action Requested: Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map & Planned Development Permit ; for a 28 -lot residential subdivision. Location: 1320 & 1340 W. Sacramento Avenue, located on the north side of.W. Sacramento Avenue between and Gateway Lane and Victorian Park Drive. Assessor's Parcel No.: 043-280-002 & 013 Parcel Size: 5.88 acres t Project Density: The gross project density is 4.8 units per acre. Lot Sizes: The proposed 28 single-family lots range in size from 4,548 square feet (s.f.) to 11,979 s.f., with an average lot size of 6,253 s.f. . Existing Zoning: RI (Low Density Residential) Existing Land Use: Walnut orchard with a single-family residence. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Surrounding Land Uses: N Apartment Complex S W. Sacramento Avenue and residential subdivisions E •Single-family residence (w/pending application for apartments) W, Single-family residential subdivision Environmental Review: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration ORCHARD COMMONS SUBDIVISION&.PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (S 02-14 & PDP 02-09) . Project Description This application involves a vesting tentative subdivision map and planned development permit (PDP) to divide. a 5.88 acre parcel into 28 single-family residential lots, at a density of 4.8 units per acre. Proposed lots range in size from 4,548 square feet (s.f.) to 11,979, s.f. with an average lot size of 6,253 s.f.. The existing residence and barn on the site would be demolished. As part of the PDP, the applicant is requesting a variation to the City's 40% site coverage requirements to allow up to 50% site coverage on the residential lots. The applicant is also requesting modifications to City subdivision design criteria and improvement standards to allow non - separated sidewalks along the site's W. Sacramento Avenue frontage, allow storm water runoff to be retained and disposed of on site, and to allow a private alley to be maintained through a road maintenance agreement. Access for the proposed subdivision would be via a new public road (33 feet wide with a 56 foot wide right-of-way) off W. Sacramento Avenue, which would end in a cul-de-sac at the northern end of the site. Fifteen of the 28 lots would have access off this proposed access road (Raven Lane). A shorter roadway (Cayman Court), which would also end in a cul-de-sac, would extend off Raven Lane to the eastern end of the site. Nine of the 28 lots would have access off this roadway. Four lots (Lots 1-4) at the front of the property would face onto W. Sacramento Avenue. Access to these four lots would be via a private alley located at the rear of the lots. This alley would have access off Raven Lane. i A portion of the proposed access road for the subdivision (Raven Lane) will cross the, easternmost property line of the neighboring parcel located to the west. An agreement has been entered into between the neighbor and the project applicant to allow an ingress/egress easement across a portion of the neighboring property for the main access road. Environmental Setting The 5.88 acre site is developed with a single-family residence and barn, while the remainder of the site is a walnut orchard. In addition to walnut trees, the site contains a handful of maple, oak, and pine trees.. The project site is level and does not contain any wetlands or special species habitat due to historical use as an orchard. Surrounding uses include W. Sacramento Avenue and single-family residential subdivisions to the south, single-family residential subdivisions to the west, a single-family residence and apartment complexes to the east, and an apartment complex to the north. A separate parcel, which contains a single-family residence, is also located adjacent to the proposed access point for the subdivision along W. Sacramento Avenue. Drainage Issues The proposed drainage plan prepared by the applicant's engineer calls for retaining surface water runoff via an underground storm water retention facility located between the main roadway and proposed Lots 1 and 8 (identified as Parcel A on the subdivision map). This underground retention facility would be sized to accommodate a 10 -year storm and would be landscaped with 91' low shrubs, ground cover and/or grass to serve as an landscaped entryway for the development. The applicant's engineer is working with the Butte County Public Works Department to allow .any flows in excess of the 10 -year storm to be accepted into the Sacramento Avenue drainage system via an emergency outfall. Should the County determine that this is not a viable approach, an alternative drainage system will be developed which will retain all of the storm runoff on the project site to meet adopted City standards. It is anticipated that this alternative drainage system would require a modification to the design of the subdivision in the areas of proposed Parcels 1 and 8. Under this alternative design, Parcel A which is currently being set aside as the underground retention facility would be eliminated from the project map and the area of this parcel would be reverted back.to proposed Parcels 1 and 8. Parcel 8 would then become an above -ground retention pond which would be 'sized to accommodate storm water runoff based upon a 100 -year storm. Such a pond would be required to be constructed and maintained in accordance with adopted City -standards. When the pond is not wet, it could also serve as a small grassy park or play area for residents of the subdivision which would be maintained through a maintenance district. Should it be determined that the alternative drainage pond is necessary for the project, the applicant would be required. to submit an application for map modification to the City which depicts the location of the on-site retention basin. This modification to the plan be acted upon by either the Map Advisory Committee or -the Planning Commission. ... .. ... ...:.:..,....:.:. :::..:.::...:.::.:...... ....... . .. ................,.. .........:. .........v..vn .. .v. ........,,n .... ...., .. .. :.:..,. ;. ;.....'•:ii, x: v . 4i x{,:}:•:i+}riiiv :4'.:. .F•:4'•}:r 'i'ti`v:.:.w.\..>...r rr:}4ti?'v'•C•4•i}ij}:•�:i'?:i<•il� .......v r........... .. ....,.... h., .,........ ..... Fi ...........n...x......... ...., .....v. ,..::..ti•.........:..:. ::•.\ .... rv.: ..: .. { r :.\�.. ... %!.. r .:�\.......... : ..,x: t.,:\•..: rx..... 4 , .,....n � ........... .:: �.. n..4.. n. •: \•.:... r. r.......: ?..::, �:.vw :v.... rr •v: •.n..... .v.v v.A.v:n. .. n: ............ r. . } .... . n4i..:.. r. fr....x \\:, 4..........{........vr. fi..,..n.\..nr .. ,. .....v , \.n........,. \...,.,.......n...r . ..\...,. r.......�. r. n... ., .. r...................::4}:•i>:t4}}:t•}}}}}:•}:•i:4i:•}}}}}}}}i}:�: :....; ... vr....t.. }:?..\.{...::... ; .. .; .. v. , ? , . .: . •� C\ f6Y�y}:4': v\„ .rH /J•}}};r.}}•}��::}:•}:???{4i:?•}}?}}}}}}}ii}}:4}i:•i}:?•}}}i}}}}}}}} `•M}•:r::.}:�,};?v>:i;'n,'•i'4:??.�:•Y'?rrry•4�:.}`!::: n}v::::::::.v: ;w::::.v.v......... w::::: . x+C,:w..... w<<n Ativ•i.\�L+}:$:?•}}}:?}?i}}}}i:4}}i}:•}:?4}}}:•iiii:`viiJii}'Fii.}: n Date of Application 3 G V •r • IO Property Owner �`• V\� t ■ • a— �J` " - Y�(�: �� Phone , `� • " _ Number Mailing Address Agent if an PhoneNumbei Mailing Address :::�.j�,f� •� •. . �.:...... :................... .....................:::::::::::::::::................................................:....:..:::::::::::::::::::.........................:...::::::::::::::::::::::.:......... ...............:::::::..:.................................................... :.................... ::: :::; : ;:;:.:;•>:::::ii;i ::::: :i:i;r;:i:::;>;R::;::::::>:::i':i:.::::::::':::::::.}>:.}:4}:.}»:.}:;•}:.}}:.}}}?:4:•>}:.}:.:<.::.: ...::..... .... <:;::::' % `i ::i5'% ::::''''::::: '<;:?::: •r:: ' '::::: ;:?t•}:.}:.>::.:.:.::.}»:.........:•}:•>:•}:•}:•>;{.? ::':;;:;:;>::.}}:.}»:.}:.:.:.}:.>::.:?:.>:.:>:.?:.}:.}::.>:::::: n•::::: ''<: 22::<:>::}::i::::i::: :;i'} :::::::::::j:{<:; :;::::::2:': 20}<i'::::t :::::•}::y:'4}: }: }::;4>:.}::::}:..}?:.»:::}'>::>::}:'::::.}':.}:y:•::•: i:.}:4>}:;.};•:.}:::t:::::+:::>" may.,., ,..• ��.!:F:LiTf71: Street Address Assessor's Parcel No. �0 `i'3 - 2�0 ` coo 2 t o A `3 " Parcel Size 5e 60 CLC • ` Subdivision Name 0 CA a L�n r►tio n S j - , _ Zoning `�,�� Lot Number 5 Classification FBF V ... .. ..... ...... .... . ... ....\::?... ... ... . 9) MY Will ..N "Olt Existing Land Use S 1\ Y\ --Z J., V- f (describe) Proposed Land Use -LLIR k o k- gAndp -�ayy-m vi "n'Q )A Azt V C S 6 A .(describe) For'Residential Uses Number of Parcels or Units on Site (including secondary units) For Other Land Uses Hours of Use Number of Maximum Number People on Site..-. Method of Calculation Height Data Height above Ground of Tallest Object (including antennas & trees) Highest Elevation (ab6ve sea level) of Any Object or, Terrain on Site -q 17-s Flight Hazards Does the project involve any characteristics which could create 0 Yes XNo Electrical interference, confusing fights, glare, smoke, or Other )Electrical or visual hazards to aircraft flight? Does the project have the potential for attracting birds? 0 Yes KNo If yes to either, describe 3 11 ..........•+ �•\`is4:•i+:{;i::w:::•ii:4:•.}:v:?i:v:'::: [rr[11 •; �il.•:F• ' :,':•• i •. �'� ti:iy; {v:•: .. ...: ... \,,, .... ii.+v:'�i�}i:^:^:�:Oi'^:•i'•i:{:{4v ,•: is i:L:•i:v.......,v�: nv: n:.; \.....: ............. . ..: vv::::.v::::::...., ......... ........................::::::: :v::.......:::.v::........ A}, t,: .•jam]: .. + t? ...... :..........: 4.v..., ::•:iiY^:•i:^:^:•iiii;:i;i:i;:?i::ii�:iii'�iiiijii:^ii:??iii:%3i:{•i:hi:�ii::iijY�':•?:?•?iiiiif' �' ...t....,w::ti•::•: is ':•! 'OM1? ;• 4, ::tiv : ¢n .: t �i v { J}ti;:}:;:;$is;:;:;:}?:i;:;:i:::ii:4:i:;:ii:4i?:ilii iii�iii:4ii}i;�:::i:<•? �..,, +"i Fh F .��....: . .�: .. v' • :.�: :........ :.. t ....:.tt......... t .t . ,.;...............:........................ ' :.v;.'::.y�i$}>:v?:•ji:6:v ,:�.. :.::•:................:::,;�i::i:•::vittt•:::: '•:{: 4:•iii:iii:{4iiiiii'r �iiiiiiiii'ii.i ^: iiiiiiiiii}:;iiiiii:t%i f::..........,:•::::::.v>::•:::.,::{o-::•i:•i:ii;....... .... Date Received 1 e a 3 _ Type of project f et♦� t. S.. .� . Agency Name ❑ General Plan Amendment ❑ Zoning Amendment or ;' ' ' • • a ` 4 ` . Variance t. ' Ile, Staff Contact. _ NG��' - • , �� Subdivision Approval Phone Number ., .0 Use Permit Agency's Project No. ' , " , { '` ,' _ • - . t 0 Public Facility + s • z H ' ❑ Other , • Signature D ate. �,� (Applicant or Age: is'. 4�~ n • � .. ' G{ '. � .11Y'. /.i8n•:2v}2iT!irF.'+nn': ' + Ilk f`.3 � `i•� � • � • .! • . . .r �+ +irk •, 1 •r, . A +;.., a - J - 1• •� � [-� •, i�F._` i a � ' s • ,.. `: .y Y , 1 , M.♦ k- •'� ' '• a '• �- '•� �.t •